« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 230   Go Down

Author Topic: 2011 Chicago Bears  (Read 35623 times)

guest77

  • Guest
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #45 on: April 20, 2011, 10:41:14 am »
The first 5 of the last 7 games  look winnable, but Bears always seem to suck traveling West, so it's worriesome.  If they dig themselves a big hole in the 1st 3 weeks, it looks like they'd have a chance to dig out of it there 
Logged

yapper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8299
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #46 on: April 20, 2011, 10:51:29 am »
The one thing that stinks about that opening schedule is that not only are they 3 very good teams, but they are all NFC teams.

Certainly we can recover from an 0-3 start...  but losing to the Falcons, Saints and Packers would severely hurt our playoff chances because the only way we are likely to make the playoffs this year is as a wildcard... and not having the head-to-head advantage against any of those teams could be devastating in a tiebreaking scenario.

I also see we have 4 night games.  That's not so great.

Cutler's return to Denver on Dec. 11 should be fun...  assuming he's not on IR by then.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2011, 10:58:03 am by yapper »
Logged

Keysbear

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2218
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #47 on: April 20, 2011, 11:15:17 am »
There won't be an agreement in place between the owners and the players soon enough to allow for 5 preseason games. I'll be surprised to see 2.
Logged

Jackiejokeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5304
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #48 on: April 20, 2011, 10:02:12 pm »
Quote from: yapper on April 20, 2011, 10:21:44 am
Pompeii is ****ing about the Bears having 5 preseason games...  I say, bring 'em on.


 I have no idea what you meant to say...BLEEP BOT took over.
Logged

yapper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8299
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #49 on: April 21, 2011, 08:32:12 am »
The word was witch with a b.

Also, incredibly, this site hashes out the word "****" (rhymes with "ramble" and starts with g, people go to Vegas to do it).  Seriously... are the Mormons running this site or something? Weird.
Logged

wizard61

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Location: So Cal
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #50 on: April 21, 2011, 09:40:57 am »
b-itch? g-amble? f-uck? p-issant?
Logged

boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5724
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #51 on: April 21, 2011, 09:54:39 am »
Too bad a mod or someone cant put in a list of acceptable words. 
Logged

wizard61

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Location: So Cal
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #52 on: April 21, 2011, 10:00:30 am »
just type a dash after the first letter. it will be okay.
Logged

yapper

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8299
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #53 on: April 21, 2011, 10:17:32 am »
And yet, "suck" and "hell" make the cut.

OK, whatever. I can adapt. I'm liking the format otherwise.
Logged

chifaninva

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7027
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #54 on: April 21, 2011, 10:50:08 am »
That's me, I think it $ucks as$ that we can't type whatever. But, I'm cool with the place otherwise
Logged

46

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3262
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #55 on: April 21, 2011, 12:39:05 pm »
Ditto. The sockcuckers!
Logged

Jackiejokeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5304
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #56 on: April 22, 2011, 02:50:17 am »
Quote from: yapper on April 21, 2011, 08:32:12 am
The word was witch with a b.

Also, incredibly, this site hashes out the word "****" (rhymes with "ramble" and starts with g, people go to Vegas to do it).  Seriously... are the Mormons running this site or something? Weird.

 Man thats really going over the edge.

 Put JBN and Sailorgirl in charge.

 This is getting beyond stupid and even W61 has to admit it.

 Show us a list of BANNED words...we'll take it from there.

 You cant type gaamble?

 Jesus Christ...c'mon already!
Logged

packrat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7901
  • Location: Minonk , IL
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #57 on: April 22, 2011, 12:22:04 pm »
Quote
[
Jesus Christ
Now, that should be banned!  That's true profanity in the context used.

Vulgarity is tolerable; profanity uis not.
Logged

packrat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7901
  • Location: Minonk , IL
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #58 on: April 22, 2011, 12:29:20 pm »
Quote
...“Look, fans don’t buy tickets to see Virginia or Brian McCaskey,” Gould told the Chicago Tribune. “They pay to watch Brian Urlacher, Drew Brees and all the great players. This lockout is all because of the owners’ greed. I’m sorry if that sounds cold, but it is the truth.”...


True, Robby, but they don't come to see just you guys, either.  If you are not satisfied with  a multi-million dollar salary the fans will go and and see some other guys play the game who are willing.

The players have the same big-head problems that the owners do.
Logged

Jackiejokeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5304
Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
« Reply #59 on: April 22, 2011, 08:41:19 pm »
Quote from: packrat on April 22, 2011, 12:22:04 pm
Now, that should be banned!  That's true profanity in the context used.

Vulgarity is tolerable; profanity uis not.


 Luckily nobody elected you to be the moderator of good taste.

 As your views are unique upon yourself and not applicable to anyone else.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 230   Go Up
« previous next »