Sure, maybe it will be Hudson at $1.5 and Wilson $1.2, who knows until the deals come out. But agree, Hudson probably floor is $1 and presumably Wilson higher.
The market economics on Wilson may speak to his particular market: what will it take to sign *him*. But it does NOT apply to anybody else's market. There were plenty of other prospects, good prospects, who would likely have been willing to sign for $1.5 or less, and who didn't have the Vandy factor.
But, of all the guys out there, the Cubs decided that Wilson even with his Vandy-bargaining-power was still the better value/gamble/investment. Again, they may we way wrong. But if they saw him as on-par with three other guys, they may as well pick the guy without Vandy-inflation. Suggests that in their valuation, rightly or wrongly, he really was BPA. Very surprising.