Author Topic: Cubs in '12  (Read 167439 times)

CurtOne

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27369
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10875 on: January 08, 2013, 07:15:16 pm »
I still see a hole at third.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17380
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10876 on: January 08, 2013, 07:53:10 pm »
The twitter rumor was Wood, Lake to O's; Hardy to Det; Porcello to Cubs

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25895
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10877 on: January 08, 2013, 08:06:03 pm »
Didn't the Tigers refuse to include Castellanos in a deal for Garza a year ago?  Can't imagine they'd give him up for anything the Cubs would be willing to offer now.

I think we're probably just going to have to accept that Stewart/Valbuena will cover third base this year and hope for the best.  There are no major league third baseman available.  There are still rumors that the Indians would trade Asdrubal Cabrera for the right return if they want to slide a shortstop over to third...but it sounds like they'd have to be blown away.  Texas doesn't seem likely to trade Olt for anything but a major hitter.  The Indians don't really have any options other than Chisenhall at third themselves, the Padres don't seem to be in a hurry to trade Gyorko, and the Tigers don't seem to have a big enough need anywhere to trade Castellanos (and he probably isn't ready anyway).  Unless the Porcello/Hardy 3-way deal would include Peralta coming to the Cubs, I don't think there's an improvement out there.

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10878 on: January 08, 2013, 09:07:12 pm »
Im gonna be real with you all when I say I dont want to get rid of Junior Lake yet. We've had high hopes for him for a while now and he's close to contributing. We're a rebuilding team anyway sorely lacking for position players and Rick Porcello aint nothing special.


Jes Beard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10880 on: January 10, 2013, 05:48:25 am »
http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2013/01/brett-jacksons-strikeout-rate-reaches-historic-level/


And while the article emphasizes Jackson's high K rate, it didn't both to try to address the issue of improvement in K rates.  Dave Duncan, the one player the article mentioned who had a higher K higher than Jackson in 100 or more AB, did that in his rookie season, improved considerably over his career.  By age 26 Duncan's K's had fallen to a rate of 68 in 403 AB, or 16.8%, and over the course of his entire career his K rate was 23.4%.

No one has really even begun to contend that Jackson can succeed in the majors if he continues striking out at his current rate.  The real question is whether he can bring it down and if so by how much.

Duncan -- the player the article mentioned because he was the only one with a K rate higher than Jackson -- did not have anything close to Jackson's eye at the plate, walking well less than half as many times as he K'd over his entire major league career, and yet he reduced his K's dramatically.

Is there anyone who doubts whether Jackson could succeed in the majors if he cut his K rate as much as Duncan did, getting it down into the 17-24% range?

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25895
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10881 on: January 10, 2013, 10:38:33 am »
Keith Law's list of the top 25 major leaguers under 25 includes two Cubs: Castro at #8 (behind Trout, Harper, Heyward, Stanton, Strasburg, Kershaw, and Machado) and Rizzo at #18.

Quote
8. Starlin Castro
AVG .283   OBP .323   OPS .753   HR 14   SB 25   WAR 3.4
Current: Castro's bat speed and hand-eye coordination have produced very impressive results for a player who has yet to turn 23, walks about twice a month and is only an average runner. Castro's total of 529 hits through his age-22 season ranks 20th all-time, and he's played fewer games than any player ahead of him except Ted Williams (563 hits in nine fewer games). He's also improved himself to the point where he's playable at shortstop and might be forced off the position by another player, rather than forcing himself off of it through poor play.

Future: If Castro barely improves from here, he's still a valuable big leaguer because he can handle short and is likely to hit at least .300 with plenty of doubles power. I think he'll grow into 20-homer power in time, and while his walk rates are pretty low, he's not hopeless at the plate, giving me some reason to think he could add 15-20 walks a year in time.


18. Anthony Rizzo

AVG .285   OBP .342   OPS .805   HR 15   SB 3   WAR 2.2
Current: The Cubs acquired Rizzo for hard-throwing, constantly-injured Andrew Cashner before the 2012 season, and they helped Rizzo shorten his swing to allow him to make more contact, especially against lefties. The changes largely worked: Rizzo cut his strikeout rate dramatically versus his 2011 tenure with the Padres, even making more contact against southpaws.

He's a terrific defensive first baseman and has earned high marks for his makeup from all three of the organizations that have employed him.

Future: A full season for Rizzo in 2013 should see him hit close to 25 homers with an average in the high .200s along with that great defense at first. He's only moderately patient, although that might improve as he becomes more of a power threat. The biggest question is whether he can avoid becoming a platoon player: He raked against lefties in Triple-A last year but had just a .599 OPS against them in the majors, albeit with a .221 BABIP. Given his age and the speed with which he has made adjustments, I like his odds of figuring out southpaws.

JR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13681
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10882 on: January 10, 2013, 02:43:57 pm »
Quote
Carrie Muskat ‏@CarrieMuskat

#Cubs sign Luis Valbuena to $930,000 contract, avoid arbitration. Invite Brent Lillibridge, Darnell McDonald, Brian Bogusevic to ST

davep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15895
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10883 on: January 10, 2013, 02:46:56 pm »
The Cubs seem to be higher on Valbuena than most of us.  Almost a million dollars a year isn't bad for someone picked up off the waiver wire.

Dave23

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12749
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10884 on: January 10, 2013, 03:11:10 pm »
I like Valbuena quite a bit. Loved his glove...

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25895
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10885 on: January 10, 2013, 03:13:02 pm »
I still irrationally like Valbuena.  He seems to do everything well except hit for average.  Just hit .260-.270, and he's an under-the-radar productive supersub like Jose Hernandez was from about 1997-2002.

JR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13681
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10886 on: January 10, 2013, 03:23:41 pm »
I'm not sure that salary reflects any particularly high thinking.  He was arb eligible, so that usually means a bump to around 7 figures or close to it even if you're a utility guy like Valbuena.

Theo's thinking of him is probably about the same as most around here.  At worst he's a good backup defensive infielder with a little bit of offensive upside.

StrikeZone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10887 on: January 11, 2013, 07:11:15 am »
Valbuena is better than Ian Stewart.

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10888 on: January 11, 2013, 07:17:21 am »
That aint saying much. He's [Valbuena] nothing but a bench player at most on a good team.

davep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15895
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10889 on: January 11, 2013, 11:58:20 am »
Spring Training invitee report

Astros instrucional league report

A surprising power arm closed out the game for the Astros, righty Dayan Diaz. The 23-year-old Colombian got ground balls and strikeouts in Lo-A Lexington this season but minor league relievers old for the level have a steep developmental hill to climb. Diaz threw an explosive two-seam fastball with plus life that sat 94-96 and hit 97, backing it up with an 82 mph curveball that he only threw once, but was easily above average and showed plus potential with sharp depth and 11-to-5 tilt.

Diaz is listed at 5’10, 156 pounds and didn’t look much bigger than that. He also has a longer arc to his arm action with a slight stab and a high effort delivery with some herky-jerky in it. Diaz generates the life with his three-quarters slot and takes and angle toward the right-handed batter’s box that, along with the run on his heater, helps give righties fits. While there are clear prospect downsides with age, effort in the delivery and the vagaries of projecting relievers, Diaz showed me late inning upside and is a guy to watch in 2013.