Author Topic: Cubs in '18  (Read 75837 times)

craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13194
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #690 on: December 08, 2017, 04:11:22 pm »
Amazing how much this hurts, even though I always knew we were an extreme longshot.  Otani is such a freak at this cost it's almost impossible to gauge his surplus value.

I really don't know where the Cubs go after this.  Cobb makes little sense to me after signing Chatwood, and the other FA options apart from Darvish are pretty unappealing.  I know next winter is a much better FA class to say the least, but can you really afford to throw away a year of your window when windows close so fast modern baseball?

Heh heh, that's kind of how I felt, too.  Never thought we had much chance, but then some of the morning buzz was getting hopes up; and with him the hopes for years of greatness were just limitless.   O well, back to reality, as is the usual way in life!  :)

I don't see the "Cobb makes little sense" bit, though.  Why not, and what does Chatwood have to do with that?  With Chatwood in hand, Cobb to me actually seems like as good or better a fit than ever.  Certainly can budget-fit both.  Cobb's not too old, age fits.  Obviously Cobb's very limited velocity-wise, but there's potental to pitch significantly better future than he has past, if he could recover feel and touch on his weird ball.  If you got the good versions of both of those guys, you could have a very good, contender-ish rotation, and either could pitch their way into playoff rotation.  Cobb makes excellent sense, in my always-hopeful, always-optimistic view.   I don't think a rotation with Hendricks, Quintana, Lester, Cobb, and Chatwood would be necessarily too weak to have WS-aspirations, if things broke right.  (Obviously you'd need to have some hitters hit....)   
Agree Agree x 1 View List

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17383
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #691 on: December 08, 2017, 04:42:03 pm »
People are underrating Quintana, Hendricks and Lester here too. 

ticohans

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5140
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #692 on: December 08, 2017, 04:45:08 pm »
I'd be all for a Cobb signing.

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17063
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #693 on: December 08, 2017, 04:46:17 pm »
Craig, I just don't see the sense in spending 100-million plus on two guys are basically #4-5 starters (though Chatwood has the upside to be more).  Cobb isn't all that appealing to me, TBH - he's a two-pitch pitcher who's never thrown 200 innings, and he's going to cost probably 5 years at 70 million-plus.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17383
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #694 on: December 08, 2017, 05:06:29 pm »
Cobb was tied for 36 in fWAR with Jake Arrieta. If that is your definition of a 4/5th starter....

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17063
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #695 on: December 08, 2017, 05:20:06 pm »
Mediocre stuff, mediocre peripherals, mediocre health.  Mediocre pitcher.

davep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15895
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #696 on: December 08, 2017, 07:46:16 pm »
Buster Olney on ESPN 1000 in Chicago just now (supposedly):

“Multiple GM’s around the league feel the Cubs feel EXTREMELY confident about their chances about getting Ohtani after their presentation”

I believe we received the same reports about Tanaka after the interview with him.

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #697 on: December 08, 2017, 07:50:16 pm »
Ill admit that once I realized Otani was basically gonna sign for free I was all for him but now that we didnt Ill let it be known that I dont think he's gonna be a two way player.

He'll be an elite pitcher that can hit ala Madison Bumgardner but what good will that do in the AL?

And we all know the injury history of Japanese pitchers.

davep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15895
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #698 on: December 08, 2017, 07:52:51 pm »
I think that Cobb is the very best we can hope for.  I doubt very seriously that the Cubs will seriously consider coming up with the money for Darvish or Arrieta. 

Possibly Lynn, if you think he is better than Cobb.

JeffH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6191
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #699 on: December 08, 2017, 08:04:19 pm »
I don't think this is how it's going to play out, but I'd rather fill out the rotation with some ham-n-eggers and load up the bullpen - Morrow, Reed, and a third.
Like Like x 1 View List

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17063
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #700 on: December 08, 2017, 08:09:02 pm »
I think I would, too.  Sign a 5th starter with high risk but some upside, spend real money on real relievers and load up next winter then there's a glut in the SP market.

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25899
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #701 on: December 09, 2017, 12:27:40 pm »
I wonder if the Yankees are out on Alex Cobb now that they have Stanton.  Are they close enough to the luxury tax that they're going to have to go cheaper to fill out the rotation?

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17063
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #702 on: December 09, 2017, 08:55:12 pm »
FWIW, Levine says the Cubs are pushing hard to sign Cobb before Monday.

Not that nuts for that move, not so much because Cobb isn't an OK pitcher but because that means $100 million+ dumped on two back-end rotation guys without doing anything to fix a badly broken bullpen losing its only reliable member, and five SP with multi-year commitments going into the best FA year for SP in baseball history.  You'd basically be adding two starters who, unless they exceed expectations, really aren't guys you'd look forward to starting in a postseason game.

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25899
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #703 on: December 09, 2017, 09:14:40 pm »
Ha, I'd like a Cobb signing...I guess we're on opposite sides of all pitchers this offseason.  Ideally, he'd have a history of eating more innings. But when healthy (and he seemed to be fully back from TJ by the end of the year), he's been a consistent 2.5-3 win pitcher.  If he pitches 175ish innings again next year, he's exactly how I wanted the Cubs to fill out the back of the rotation.

If they do settle the rotation before the meetings really start, I wonder (and maybe this is just wishful thinking) if that makes them more likely to go hard after Yelich. As good as the free agent market is for relievers, I don't think they're going to use any of their top trade depth for the bullpen.  So they'd be in a position to be aggressive with the Marlins.

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17063
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #704 on: December 09, 2017, 09:24:33 pm »
Ha, I'd like a Cobb signing...I guess we're on opposite sides of all pitchers this offseason.  Ideally, he'd have a history of eating more innings. But when healthy (and he seemed to be fully back from TJ by the end of the year), he's been a consistent 2.5-3 win pitcher.  If he pitches 175ish innings again next year, he's exactly how I wanted the Cubs to fill out the back of the rotation.


Chatwood and Cobb is problematical for a number of reasons, another one of which is that both have below-average track records when it comes to staying healthy.  If you somehow got 30 starts from each of them, this looks like a rotation that could get you to the postseason pretty well.  But it's not an intimidating playoff rotation by any stretch - it just lacks the shutdown power guys that dominate in October and November.  Maybe Lester can be that guy again, maybe he can't.  I don't see that out of the others. 


The biggest issue is that the bullpen was a disaster in October, and it's going to require a massive overhaul that hasn't even begun yet.  Is there enough money left to sign all the guys necessary to rebuild it?