Bleacher Bums Forum

Hasnt Sharma been telling us nothing is all that wrong with bryant for a while now?

I'm not sure what you mean by that. I would hope no one here would suggest that Sharma is deterred from honest, genuinely analytical analysis by either naivete, rose colored glasses or subterfuge. 

I think it's baseball.   

Actually I would agree if it was one or maybe two players, but when the whole team looks like crap...

I wonder if to some degree it isn't modern baseball and Cubs player selection? 
1.  I think high-end guys like Almora, Bryant, Russell, they'd all gotten lots of good coaching prior to joining the Cubs?  Maybe there isn't as much additional intellectual information to learn for guys like that as your average guy their age might have had decades ago in the pre-saber and pre-internet era? Maybe they had nothing left to learn by the time they came up? 
2.  Same for nutrition and stuff, for physical maturation?  Almora had some, yes, but Bryant, Schwarber, Russell, are they any more physically mature and ready than when they were rookies?  Over baseball history that maybe isn't routinely true for young-20's guys.  But maybe there was nothing left to develop physically by the time they came up?
3.  The Cubs have put a priority on smart, motivated, thinking players with their top-8 draft picks.  Again, maybe they were so naturally smart and inquisitive and motivated that they'd kind of already gained whatever head knowledge they could gain by the time they came up?  Maybe smart guys like them don't leave as much left to learn by the time they are rookies? 

Saber history I believe indicates that young hitters tend to get better and improve their power production after their rookie year.  I'm wondering whether for Bryant/Schwarber/Russell/Almora/Happ types, they were already at their physical, mental, and psychological/confidence ceilings when they came up and started fast?  And have had nowhere to go but ideally plateau or else decline subsequently? 

None of those guys have seemed to adjust in any significant positive way. 

Bryant was pretty freaking fantastic from the get go. ...

Yeah, that was my point.  He was fantastic from the start.  Easier to go down then to go up. 

If your hitting is already pretty much optimized when you come up, or by your 2nd year, you lack margin for further improvement?

Yeah, that was my point.  He was fantastic from the start.  Easier to go down then to go up. 

If your hitting is already pretty much optimized when you come up, or by your 2nd year, you lack margin for further improvement?

Whereas opposing pitchers possibly hadn't optimized their approach to Happ, Russell, and Schwarber during their rookie years?     

Bryant has continued to improve though.  His rookie year he had a 30.6% K% and it dropped to 19.6% his third year.

Russell has had injuries that have sapped his offense the past 2 years.  And Schwarber tied for the 63rd best wRC+ in baseball last.  He was a really good hitter last year.  I think he gets caught up in people thinking he was going to be in the Bryant/Rizzo class on offense which would have been a tippy top outcome for him.  Happ and Almora are really the only guys from a pure development stand point that haven't developed.

Len  "Always good to see Starlin Castro".  His photo included news that he is in his 10th MLB season.  Time flies I guess

Bote singles in 2, Baez to third.  3-0.

Miami pitcher grew up in Aviston, Cardinal stronghold.