Author Topic: 2017 Chicago Bears  (Read 24468 times)

guest118

  • Guest
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1395 on: December 08, 2017, 11:07:18 am »
I don't know if anyone else posted this but:

John Fox total wins in 3 seasons = 12

Marc Trestman in 2 seasons = 13

Why hasn't Fox left the team.....because he has already quit and it showed Sunday. Sad.

dallasbear

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6744
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1396 on: December 08, 2017, 11:31:08 am »

Agreed about the overuse of Hicks - he's not the same player he was in the first half.  He's their only legit d-lineman that can generate pressure on the pass.  And Bears were real reluctant to play Ballard and Robertson-Harris early on.  And now they are only starting to play John Jenkins.

And if you caught otto's comment about Abe Gibron's family celebration is that Fox is approaching Gibron's worst winning percentage as a Bear coach.

I said it at the beginning of the season this team has the ability to play with anybody...but would be in serious trouble if there were injuries as their is very little depth.   We lost 3 of our top 4 WRs at the beginning of the season with Meridith, White and Wheaton all going out.   Pass rush was decent even after losing Willie Young with Floyd and McPhee. 

chifaninva

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7023
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1397 on: December 08, 2017, 04:42:22 pm »
And if you caught otto's comment about Abe Gibron's family celebration is that Fox is approaching Gibron's worst winning percentage as a Bear coach.

I wondered..

otto105

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11744
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1398 on: December 08, 2017, 06:10:57 pm »
Speaking of holiday traditions and celebrations, Johnny Morris and his family will be popping that 50th bottle of champagne.


boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5724


boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5724

dallasbear

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6744
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1402 on: December 13, 2017, 10:25:00 am »

Yeah, interesting but not totally believable.  If I'm the GM, how do I let the head coach influence a draft pick taken in the 4th round?  Or any draft pick for that matter?

I'm sure there's influence from the head coach on the draft just as there is influence from the GM to play certain people, but bottom line if I'm the GM I'm drafting who I want based on information from player personnel department and scouts.

chifaninva

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7023
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1403 on: December 13, 2017, 11:25:21 am »
I think it could easily have happened that way. I could hope the gm is considering the coach's wish list an needs. After all, the coach is the one that has to make the pieces of the puzzle fit.

The bears can't get rid of Fox fast enough for me. I wasn't all that excited when they hired him. I understood the hire, but didn't care all that much for it..

davebear

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5554
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1404 on: December 13, 2017, 06:57:54 pm »
So now this week we find out about past attepts to get quarterbacks.  How does this Erik Lambert know this when the top beat writers didn't.
I would think Prescott in the fourth round would be expected as a backup not a big threat to Cutler.

dallasbear

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6744
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1405 on: December 14, 2017, 11:26:23 am »

Tribune/Campbell

Fuller has had a solid year, improving his availability and the frequency with which he has broken up passes. But let’s not get carried away with Pro Bowl chatter. He was in coverage on the decisive touchdown pass in the devastating home loss to the Packers and on a touchdown in the home loss to the Vikings, to name two critical negative plays.

I agree that Fuller is not a pro-bowler, but to call out a couple TDs he gave up during the year is unfair.  The NFL game is about passing and any NFL CB is going to give up TDs during a season.  As for Fuller, I don't think he's given up much more than those 2 this year and he's had a very solid season.

Anyway, the lack of interceptions may actually help the Bears in re-signing Fuller next  year.



WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15225
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1406 on: December 14, 2017, 12:46:04 pm »
Might indeed lower the price, if he really wants to come back. But at least he is trying to show his best whether its for the Bears or some other team. But unlike other years, there will be more players in this years player pool at CB, thus lowering the price. But if you dont want to draft inexperience and prefer a vet I'd rather have someone who knows the system as opposed to someone from another system. And that would depend on what the Bears do with their coaching staff. So who knows the end result as things stand now.

Sportster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8342
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1407 on: December 14, 2017, 11:13:10 pm »
Not at all unfair. Just showing the pluses and minuses, good and bad. You want a consistent cover corner. Fuller has not been consistent, really at all, but there are no other options presently so he stays.....

dallasbear

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6744
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1408 on: December 15, 2017, 12:11:01 pm »

Bears were without their 3 top pass rushing OLBs last week and Fuller had to face AJ Green - how did that go?   According to PFF Fuller had the second highest CB ranking in the NFL last week.

Neither Amukamora or Fuller have been excelling in the turnover department - though each have had tipped balls that led to picks.  Not saying Fuller's elite or shutdown - he is very solid, but for you to call his play inconsistent this season tells me that you aren't watching the games. 

He'll get some tough matchups tomorrow going against Stafford and Detroit's aerial circus in the dome.  Hopefully we'll get some more consistent pass rush with McPhee returning.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5724
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #1409 on: December 15, 2017, 06:36:44 pm »
Um if you are counting on McPhee to generate consistent pass rush, whooo boy.  Good luck with that.  Just saying.
Agree Agree x 1 View List