Author Topic: 2017 Chicago Bears  (Read 14677 times)

WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7992
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #15 on: February 14, 2017, 04:03:00 pm »
Prediction: The Texans go all in on Romo. Osweiler signs a one-year deal with the Bears, reuniting with John Fox.

That would be strange.

Dave23

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7333
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #16 on: February 14, 2017, 08:57:34 pm »
I like it better than many other options. Osweiler played pretty well under Fox, and it's only a 1 year deal...might catch lightning in a bottle...

WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7992
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #17 on: February 14, 2017, 10:44:58 pm »
I watched the Texan playoff game and he didn't look all that bad. I cant see the deal flying. Are the Texans going to buy out Osweiler's contract, or is his deal a series of one year deals? I don't see their way out of his contract. It sounds like somebody's wet dream.

boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #18 on: February 15, 2017, 12:43:43 pm »
Eric Kush was brought in as depth last year when the Bears lost center Hroniss Grasu to a torn ACL.

They must have liked what they saw, since they’re keeping Kush around.

The team announced they had signed the journeyman offensive lineman to a two-year deal.

Kush may be best known for his “Man of a Thousand Tank Tops” persona on Hard Knocks, and has had previous stints with the Chiefs, Buccaneers, Panthers, and Texans.

Kush started four games for the Bears last year, so he figures to be a valuable reserve in case their line isn’t ravaged by injuries again.

Jackiejokeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5179
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2017, 09:49:10 pm »



 Boogie I edited your post :


 
Eric Kush was brought in as depth last year when the Bears lost center Hroniss Grasu to a torn ACL.

Kush started four games for the Bears last year, so he figures to be a valuable reserve in case their line isn’t ravaged by injuries again.


 Boogie ,


 Where the fuuck is Rusty Jones or someone like him when we need him ?

WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7992
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #20 on: February 17, 2017, 07:45:31 am »
He is pushing up daiseys

boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #21 on: February 17, 2017, 08:37:39 am »
We sorely need SOMEONE who can get our players in shape and healthy. 

WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7992
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #22 on: February 17, 2017, 12:20:54 pm »
In the 4th section of the article there is no mention of Connor Shaw.. Is it because of his broken leg status? As for he is a FA argument Hoyer, Shaw and Barkley are all FAs. Just curious.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-bears-quarterback-search-ryan-pace-spt-0219-20170218-story.html#nt=oft02a-1gp2

boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #23 on: February 17, 2017, 01:00:25 pm »
They are keeping quiet on Shaw so noone else scoops him up.  lol

WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7992
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #24 on: February 17, 2017, 01:42:18 pm »
I would definitely agree with that. Mum is the word. "Silence is golden." I think that is what the word is.

boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #25 on: February 17, 2017, 01:59:26 pm »
Then again it isnt like we have a track record of having good qbs, so who would look at the Bears in any capacity?

Dave23

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7333
2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #26 on: February 17, 2017, 02:05:44 pm »
Any interest in Nick Foles? He's still young, and was really, really good his 1st season, and was good in a limited role last season.

WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7992
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #27 on: February 17, 2017, 02:43:50 pm »
I am not the one to comment on that. That would have to be Fox and or Pace. I didn't think Bradford was going to be what he did in Minny. I would think it would depend on whether he fits the system he is put in.

boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #28 on: February 17, 2017, 03:08:24 pm »
Here is our next QB, maybe:

https://youtu.be/8XWJ9wGuGuc

WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7992
Re: 2017 Chicago Bears
« Reply #29 on: February 17, 2017, 04:00:05 pm »
He looks scared