Author Topic: 2018 Chicago Bears  (Read 27988 times)

WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15232
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #60 on: February 07, 2018, 09:17:24 pm »
And McDaniels backed out? And thats not unusual? We havent seen anything that unusual since the McGinnis fiasco. I guess then its to each his own opinion.

chifaninva

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7026
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #61 on: February 08, 2018, 05:05:28 am »
I'm guessing McDaniels is sniffing retirement of Belichick and the possibility of him take over the Patriots..

Dave23

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12757
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #62 on: February 08, 2018, 09:20:59 am »
Bingo...

dallasbear

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6747
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #63 on: February 08, 2018, 09:24:38 am »

...and maybe a little bit of a financial incentive might have been thrown in.

46

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3262
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #64 on: February 08, 2018, 10:23:26 am »
We have McGinnis here on the radio for the Titans and I listened to his side of the story when he said he was head coach of the Chicago Bears for 10 minutes.  Pencil neck, the ace Hahvad grad blurted it all over Chicago the he was the new head coach. It was news to him since they never signed a contract, never had Mickey tell him he was the coach. He got a lowball contract shoved under his nose after all this, got pissed and took a hike.  He's fun to listen to, wish he could have been the head coach.  Didn't happen.  Whatever good 'ole Joshy did, then end result was 2 coaches in Indy who don't know who there boss is going to be, and going forward a healthy distrust for playoff assitant coaches looking for head coaching jobs. Guy's a real piece of work. I don't have a lot of love for Irsay, but they got jobbed by a greasy weasel.  Good luck in N.E. with him as head coach after Bill bails.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Jackiejokeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5304
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #65 on: February 08, 2018, 06:48:23 pm »
That’s fantastic news, Urlacher was a great player.  If Tommy Harris and Mike Brown had not been injured the Bears would have won that Super Bowl and Urlacher’s legacy would be even better....


 No it wouldn't ... we had Grossman at QB.

Grizzlybear34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #66 on: February 09, 2018, 04:58:17 am »
Grossman was enough, with a completely intact defense.

Bears4Ever

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1451
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #67 on: February 09, 2018, 08:40:28 am »
Would've been a different outcome at the SB if Mike Brown were healthy and the Bears ran T Jones more often in the 2nd half....

WshflThinking

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15232
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #68 on: February 09, 2018, 10:36:58 am »
I found this very interesting from Brad Biggs in the Trib:

Free agency/draft priority: Very high. The Bears need help when it comes to wide receiver, cornerback and pass rusher with the offensive line in the mix somewhere near the top. But the wide receivers need to be completely overhauled and that is a process that will have to start in free agency. White has a guaranteed contract and will be in the mix but the Bears have to treat him like an added bonus if he’s able to stay healthy and contribute. At some point in the offseason, the club will surely announce it is declining the fifth-year option for his contract in 2019. Meredith’s future was bright coming off a breakout performance in 2016 and he’ll be in the mix once he’s fully healthy and ready to go. But the Bears are going to require a mixture of experienced additions in free agency and at least one solid draft pick in the room. They’ve got to give Trubisky some real targets to get the ball to, players that can get open, make contested catches and challenge in the red zone. The wide receivers combined for four touchdowns on the season. The Bears’ biggest problem on offense is an inability to score. They’ve got to find players that can get in the end zone and create explosive plays. The top two potential free agents are likely to be locked up by their current teams. Indications are the Rams will retain Sammy Watkins and the Jaguars aren’t likely to allow Allen Robinson to leave. That could leave Jarvis Landry of Miami as the top target if he isn’t re-signed by the Dolphins. Landry is a highly productive and competitive force but he’s pretty much strictly a slot receiver. Do the Bears want to write a huge check for a slot receiver? That’s a question general manager Ryan Pace will have to answer. After that, there are a lot of less appealing options and none of them profile as anything close to a No. 1. Sure, there have been really successful offenses that operate without a No. 1 receiver but it makes it a little more difficult. The draft isn’t stocked with a lot of options that look like elite prospects in terms of guys that would be worthy of the No. 8 pick, but there will be plenty of guys to sort through when you talk about Round 2 and later rounds. It’s going to come down to finding the right players that fit what coach Matt Nagy wants to do.

That doesnt look very promising. And Biggs wasnt very upbeat over White either with good reason. INOW the receiving corp is a mess with little to hope for.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5724
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #69 on: February 09, 2018, 10:52:25 am »
So Landry is a slot WR, isnt that where Wright did so well last year?  I agree dont break the bank to add to the strongest WR position we have, no matter how weak the group was. 

dallasbear

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6747
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #70 on: February 09, 2018, 11:02:00 am »
No revelations here.  Nobody has been upbeat about White...and we have to be guarded about Meridith too.  ACLs for speed guys are difficult to recover fully from.  I agree WR is a mess....just like CB...and OLB.  Draft can only plug so many holes unless you get lucky. 


Landry:
Good:  he's only 25, he caught 112 balls, he scored 9 TDs, we don't have a slot WR on the roster (Kendall Wright is a FA - 59/614 1 TD)

Bad:  he's not a speed WR - strictly a shifty/quick slot guy.  expensive






boogie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5724
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #71 on: February 09, 2018, 11:02:46 am »
By all accounts, this is Chicago Bears GM Ryan Pace’s biggest off-season yet, as he heads into his fourth year with a less-than-stellar 14-34 record.

On the day the Bears fired former head coach John Fox, team president Ted Phillips announced a two-year extension for Pace that would put him under contract until after the 2021 season. Many questioned the extension at the time, and rightfully so, but it’s clear the move was done to make the head coaching job more attractive for potential suitors, giving both Pace and the new head coach the same 2021 contract timeline.

Just a week after the team parted ways with Fox, they hired former Kansas City Chiefs offensive coordinator Matt Nagy and went to work on their coaching staff.

While it’s always impossible to judge a head coaching hire before games are played, the value of hiring Nagy quickly and the timing of the Chiefs loss in the opening week of the playoffs can’t be overlooked.

Nagy moved fast on his coaching staff, quickly wrapping up all three coordinator positions, the most important of which was retaining defensive coordinator Vic Fangio.

With the coaching staff intact, the Bears will look to get their ducks in a row before the start of free agency on March 14th. Many roster decisions still need to be made.

Before the team heads into the free-agent market, expect a bevy of cuts and/or restructured contracts. According to the NFLPA, the Bears are expected to carry more than $7.6 million in cap space from 2017. The club currently has $143.995 million accounted for with their top 51 contracts. With those numbers in mind, and the 2018 NFL salary cap expected to be in the league of $178 million, the Bears would walk into the off-season with roughly $41.6 million in cap space.

Without cuts, the Bears cap figure (give or take a few million) will rank within the top 10 of all NFL teams but with some expected cuts factored in, they could see close to a $40 million jump in cap space before the start of free agency. That's said, it’s important to remember that multiple teams will have just as much, if not more cap space moving into the acquisition period.

Likely Cut Candidates: ($39.745 million in savings)

QB Mike Glennon, $11.5 million
OLB Pernell McPhee, $7.075 million
WR Markus Wheaton, $5 million
OLB Willie Young, $4.5 million
CB Marcus Cooper, $4.5 million
S Quintin Demps, $3.67 million
LB Jerrell Freeman, $3.5 million
Other Possibilities: ($19.26 million)

OG Josh Sitton, $8 million
TE Dion Sims, $5.66 million
OT Bobby Massie, $5.6 million
As seen above, the Bears have many ways to create cap flexibility and will be able to position themselves well financially as they look toward March.

Pending Free Agents

Once roster decisions are made on players currently under contract, Pace will turn to his own pending free agents. That starts at the cornerback position.

-CB Kyle Fuller

Fuller is the team’s highest priority moving into the off-season and someone they simply can’t afford to lose. With the return of Fangio, the chances of Fuller returning are likely higher than they were at season's end.

The soon-to-be 26-year-old has had an up-and-down career since being selected 14th overall in the 2013 draft but he broke out in 2017 under Fangio, finishing second in the NFL in pass breakups (22). There's certainly a level of unpredictability in terms of his production but there’s also no guarantee that Fuller will re-sign without a lucrative contract.

On the open market, Fuller is likely to land a four-to-five year deal with an annual value around $11-to-$13 million. The Bears can afford that price tag but may not be overly comfortable with it. If that's the case, the franchise tag becomes a realistic option.

-CB Prince Amukamara

Amukamara is ranked second on the list simply due to his age and limited upside, as he profiles more as a No. 2 corner. Still, he’s a key piece to the defense moving forward, even if only on a short-term basis, while they groom a younger player with more upside to take over in the near future.

A starting combination of Fuller and Amukamara won't be elite but the duo could provide a steady presence on the edges of Fangio's defense, particularly if the front seven continues to develop as pass rushers.

Amukamara has stated he wants to remain in Chicago and feels the team is building some “special”, which could make him a lot easier to lock down on a two-to-three year deal around $7 million annually with a low guarantee, which would allow them to draft his eventual replacement.

-P Patrick O’Donnell

Punter is an important piece to lock up before the free agent period starts, as the team doesn’t currently have a specialist under contract for the 2018 season. While O’Donnell hasn't consistently a top-end punter in the league, he’s a former draft pick that has improved each year.

The Bears are a team that should be looking for continuity heading into Year 4 of a rebuild and locking up their punter to a multi-year deal around $2.5-3 million per year seems like a no-brainer to me.

-WR Kendall Wright

Wright’s current situation is a little strange considering his two-time offensive coordinator in Dowell Loggains is gone and Nagy’s offense is based more on speed than anything else, something like Wright lacks at this point in his career.

With that in mind, Wright led the team in receptions, receiving yards and reliability during a rocky 2017 season and that should at least be worth a short-term deal on low-risk money in the $1-2 million range.

Other Pending Free Agents

LB Christian Jones, K Cairo Santos, CB Sherrick McManis and DL Mitch Unrein.

The Bears will also have a group of restricted free agents that should play key roles in 2018. These players aren’t currently under contract but are under team control if the club chooses to tender them.

WR Cameron Meredith
CB Bryce Callahan
LS Patrick Scales
LB John Timu
Meredith and Callahan are both players that Pace could look to lock up on a cheaper long-term deals, instead of extending tenders that would only keep them under contract through 2018.

What To Expect In the Coming Weeks

Judging by recent years, Pace and Co. will start the trimming process in the last week or two in February, which will carry into the beginning of March.

Fuller is the only player on the roster worth the franchise tag, which has to be administered between Feb. 20-March 6. Pace may make some back-end acquisitions but the majority of the roster work will come in the way of cuts. A few dates to keep in mind in regard to cuts.

February 10th- March 9th

During this period, the Bears will have a choice to make on their option with 32-year-old veteran Josh Sitton. If they opt to exercise the $8.57 million option, they can cut him at any point into the new league year but most NFL teams give veterans the respect of cutting them early and letting them latch on with another team as soon as possible.

March 16th

This is a big day for multiple players because, if kept after this point, there’s a strong chance they’ll have roster spots for the 2018 season.

TE Dion Sims: $4 million of his $6 millon bases salary would be guaranteed.
QB Mike Glennon: $2.5 million roster bonus.
CB Markus Cooper: $2 million base salary becomes guaranteed.
RT Bobby Massie: $1 million roster bonus.
March 18th

S Quintin Demps: $500,000 roster bonus.
Expect a busy free-agent period for the Bear, ideally with a long-term outlook of players that will not help in 2018 but serve as multi-year pieces that will create continuity, while also cutting down on the 30 percent roster turnover that is likely in 2018.

Sportster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8351
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #72 on: February 09, 2018, 10:56:19 pm »
Get what they can in FA on the CB/DL side if anything is available, which will leave draft slots open for wideouts. This is tough....Bears need talent and they can get top talent at 8, but they also need picks which trading that pick could bring. Which direction should they go.... if they can't get good picks in the early rounds out of a trade down, the decision is easier to make. Stick with 8. But if they get compelling trades for picks in the earlier rounds, I think they have to make that trade.....

chifaninva

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7026
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #73 on: February 10, 2018, 07:45:24 am »
I think it all comes down to who's available at number 8. One thing, Pace has shown that he'll go after a player if that's who he wants (as in buy up)..

navigator

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2862
Re: 2018 Chicago Bears
« Reply #74 on: February 10, 2018, 09:48:45 am »
I've come to believe if you are picking in the top 10 and someone other teams have to plan around, you have to take them. It may be a DL,. DB, a WR,. Lb or even a RB. They just don't come along that often. If the guy available at your pick isn't one of those guys, then consider moving back and picking up more guys.