Author Topic: Cubs Draft 2017  (Read 10514 times)

JeffH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6185
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #270 on: July 03, 2017, 10:47:25 pm »
11th and 12th rounders both got $25K overslots.

No, they didn't.

craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13184
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #271 on: July 03, 2017, 11:11:28 pm »
They got $125K each.   

In recent years wasn't $100K the normal 3rd-day level beyond which you need to pull from your first-ten-rounds money? 

Has that gone up in recent contract, and if so how much?  Or was the word "slot" not appropriate for the former $100K plateau? 

JeffH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6185
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #272 on: July 03, 2017, 11:13:29 pm »
Yes, the limit has been increased to $125,000 from $100,000.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17377
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #273 on: July 03, 2017, 11:20:31 pm »
Alex Lange‏Verified account @Lange_17  Jul 2
More
 Goodbyes... 👎🏻🙅🏻‍♂️😤

It will be interesting to see if Vines or Karp sign.  I'm guessing the Varquez without a college commit is going to sign.

craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13184
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #274 on: July 04, 2017, 08:16:48 am »
Yes, the limit has been increased to $125,000 from $100,000.

Thanks.  Interesting to see the distribution of $125 and $100 guys, (6 shown of those know/reported in the teens); one $50K JC guy; and then six guys $1-10.


Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #276 on: July 06, 2017, 07:25:20 pm »
Signing deadline is 5:00 EST Friday.

Callis seems confident Cubs will sign the three unsigned guys in first 10 rounds. For me, seems curious that Lange had his physical on Monday and yet to agree (publicly) to terms 72 hours later.

Rays evidently will not be signing a sandwich round pick. These days, that's a pretty high pick not to sign.

http://m.mlb.com/news/article/240669238/draft-signings-update/


JeffH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6185
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #278 on: July 06, 2017, 09:14:50 pm »
Don't jump to conclusions, Craig.

Dave23

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12746
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #279 on: July 06, 2017, 09:15:56 pm »
Oregon State is going to be a monster again next season with Rasmussen returning...

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17377
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #280 on: July 07, 2017, 11:20:51 am »
Robert Murray is reporting issues came up with Lange's physical, maybe there will be money for Meredith after all.

chgojhawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1001
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #281 on: July 07, 2017, 11:32:51 am »
It's going to be a long 5 1/2 hours hitting the re-fresh button.

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #282 on: July 07, 2017, 11:34:25 am »
It doesn't mean enough to me to give the effort.

craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13184
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #283 on: July 07, 2017, 12:03:37 pm »
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/instagraphs/daily-prospect-notes-76/



Quote
The new CBA states that the MLB Scouting Bureau invites the top-50 pitchers (evaluations theirs) in a given draft to take a voluntary MRI. If a prospect declines, teams no longer need to offer 40% of slot to receive a comp pick if the a doctor finds something wrong with the post-draft medical.



This was written in context of Rasmussen.
*Rather than sign him for even 40%, and get the other 60% plus the overage to spend on 3rd-day picks, Rays aren't offering 40%
*So that they'll get the pick back next year. 
*But any deals that were contingent on the overage and/or underslot will be compromised. 


Of interest for Cubs/Lange, I'd think. 
*Did he take the voluntary MRI originally, and pass that? 
*If he passed that but isn't passing the Cubs physical, is that a function of a more thorough exam?  Or has his arm deteriorated since?  Maybe his heroic World Series work didn't help him? 
*If he did not take the MRI, would the Cubs prefer to sign him, and Estrada, and perhaps have some extra spending money, or might they like Rays prefer to get an equivalent pick next year? 
*Do they care enough about Estrada that losing him would matter? 
*How low could the Cubs reduce before Lange might go back to LSU? 
*Clue mentioned that the Cubs have revised their scouting rubric, with less focus on clean delivery and less penalty for the ugly mechanics that guy like Lange has.  Wonder if they'll revise their valuation rubric again?  :)

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17377
Re: Cubs Draft 2017
« Reply #284 on: July 07, 2017, 12:51:30 pm »
Perfect mechanics can still lead to TJS.  I believe most remfocus is being paid to abuse as young kids, before they even enter college.

My guess is that a deal gets done unless it is something to deal with his shoulder. If they can get enough to sign somebody else great, but the 30/31 pick is still going to be a lottery ticket next year.