As much as Wrigley is going to become commercialized after the renovations, I'm really wondering if we would have just been better off building a new park.
Is Wrigley really going to have the same charm that it had with Jumbotrons, LED scoreboards, and Budweiser ads on the clock and scoreboard? Is commercialed up Wrigley really preferable to having a new cash cow ballpark and just keeping the memories of pristine Wrigley?
I remember an article someone (Rob Neyer?) wrote about Tiger Stadium when it was falling apart and these preservation groups were trying to keep it up, even after it had been years since the Tigers had moved to their new park. Sometimes you just need to let an old park go and let it have a dignified end. Tiger Stadium definitely wasn't getting a dignified end while all these preservation groups and the city of Detroit were trying to figure out what to do with it.
I'm starting to wonder if Wrigley is really getting a dignified end if all we're going to do is prop up its usefulness by having all these new ads, displays, and the like. In some ways, all these renovations feel like putting someone on life support when the right thing to do is just to let them go. It might be better if we just had a new ballpark that's designed to be a real cash cow money maker and let Wrigley have a dignified end.