Author Topic: Cubs in '18  (Read 75759 times)

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17060
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1500 on: January 22, 2018, 11:24:17 pm »
His velocity is as good or better than ever, for what it's worth.

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17060
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1501 on: January 22, 2018, 11:25:57 pm »
My spidey senses are tingling.  The Gimenez thing doesn't feel like a coincidence.

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17060
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1502 on: January 22, 2018, 11:31:32 pm »
Chicago Tribune


@chicagotribune
 4m4 minutes ago
More
A person with direct knowledge of the discussions says the Cubs are having active talks with free-agent pitcher Yu Darvish http://trib.in/2Dz4N8s

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1503 on: January 22, 2018, 11:41:18 pm »
Well then.

Better than Cobb or Arrieta.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17380
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1504 on: January 22, 2018, 11:44:13 pm »
7 years is what I’ve seen quoted for TJS. Some last longer, some shorter. If you are talking about a 5 year deal that would but him at 7 years. The velocity and stuff being back is the big thing for him.

JR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13681
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1505 on: January 23, 2018, 12:06:05 pm »
This has to be some good news . . .

Quote
Yu Darvish - S - Dodgers

Mike Berardino of the St. Paul Pioneer Press was told by a club official who has been in contact with the Twins front office that it's doubtful the team will be able to sign Yu Darvish.

Darvish's market appears to finally be heating up, which could take the Twins out of the running. "They aren’t giving him $150 million," the club official told Berardino. It's probably a stretch to expect Darvish to receive a $150 million deal, but the bidding could still go higher than what the Twins have in mind. It was reported Monday that the Cubs are having "active talks" with Darvish, but teams like the Brewers, Dodgers, Yankees, and Rangers are also in the mix here. The Twins have an obvious need for a starter, but they might have to pivot to a second-tier name like Alex Cobb or Lance Lynn.

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25895
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1506 on: January 23, 2018, 06:54:48 pm »
I’m only posting this because the offseason is so brutally slow, so take it with several thousand grains of salt...but apparently, a Brewerfan.net poster who apparently had the Lucroy trade early a couple years ago (among other smaller deals) says the Cubs have Darvish.

http://forum.brewerfan.net/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=36301&start=160

I’m very skeptical, but it’s something. Seems like if some random forum poster knows something, Rosenthal or someone should break it soon.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17380
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1507 on: January 23, 2018, 07:04:41 pm »
I will say Darvish has been pretty active on twitter when rumors pop up to either confirm or deny them, but he’s been radio silent on this.

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17060
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1508 on: January 23, 2018, 07:07:19 pm »
I'm all about the Fox Mulder thing on this but...  Why would the Brewers be the first to know Darvish was signing with the Cubs?

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17060
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1509 on: January 23, 2018, 07:09:48 pm »
If it takes 5/125, I'm there - reluctantly.  That's probably the cutoff for me.  No 6th unless it's a club option with a small buyout or an almost impossible vest.

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25895
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1510 on: January 23, 2018, 07:15:07 pm »
I'm all about the Fox Mulder thing on this but...  Why would the Brewers be the first to know Darvish was signing with the Cubs?

There was a Darvish/Brewers rumor yesterday, so I guess that’s the connection.

It’s probably nothing.

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17060
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1511 on: January 23, 2018, 07:20:54 pm »
There was a Darvish/Brewers rumor yesterday, so I guess that’s the connection.

It’s probably nothing.

I get that, but I still don't see why they (and thus someone connected to them) would know before anybody connected to the Cubs.

If I were a poser trying to sound like an insider, saying "Darvish to the Cubs" is a decent bet.  Seems like the most likely place where he'd end up.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17380
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1512 on: January 23, 2018, 07:23:47 pm »
Mooney just published a story speculative Darvish to the Cubs piece on the Athletic that has no real info in it.

I could see Darvish’s agent telling the Brewers we have x from the Cubs, do you want to beat it or he’s going there.

davep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15895
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1513 on: January 23, 2018, 07:27:49 pm »
I can't imagine why someone connected to the Brewers would know who Darvish was going to sign with (other than the Brewers, perhaps).

But it isn't unusual for the Cubs Front Office to keep pretty strong radio silence on large deals.  I never heard any rumors about the Fowler signing before it was announced, nor had I heard anything about getting Russell from Oakland.  Most accurate Cubs rumors seem to come from the prospective free agent or from the potential trading partner, rather than from a Cub source.

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25895
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #1514 on: January 23, 2018, 07:28:16 pm »
Yeah, but he obviously seems to have fooled that forum in the past...so he seems to be smart enough to say something like “Darvish and Cubs have momentum” instead of “Darvish to Cubs” if he wants to keep the scam going. Still gets credit with the first statement while leaving an out.

Just playing devil’s advocate, you’re probably right.