Interesting.
1. Had hoped Smyly might be one of the surprise get-some-value guys next year, whether in bullpen, or maybe even in rotation.
2. Will be interesting if the "trade" actually returns any talent value, or if it's basically a salary dump, with some token non-prospect coming in return?
3. If the Cubs were to get to the World Series, would they be able to set any records for the older rotation in baseball history? They are REALLY getting old, older, and oldest. Memory is shallow, but I can't ever remember a Cubs rotation that was even close to this old-old-old.
4. Given Hamels age, and that I think his stuff is generally in decline, I'm kinda glad the Cubs just took the big-dollar one-year deal, rather than extending and committing more long-term money. (I'm lazy baseball reference guy, but he's coming off 3.78 and 4.20 ERA's, with FIP's of 4.49 and 4.62. One of the other FIP's is probably better and more favorable, but the numbers aren't that hot, and at age 35 he's not likely to get a lot faster or better.....)
5. I wonder how this worked with Texas? Had they let him go, Texas would have got socked with $6M bill. So, I wonder whether Cubs told them "We're not going to pay $7 for Smyly and $20 for Hamels. So, would you like to pay $6 for Hamels? Or would you rather pay $7 and get Smyly?"