Author Topic: Cubs in '20  (Read 49635 times)

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17383
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #345 on: October 16, 2019, 10:47:43 pm »
They had the longest and most positive write ups.
Lorretta and Venable were briefly mentioned.
Kapler has more written about digging for info on the Dodgers and a job besides manager if he isn’t hired by another team.
What seemed remotely positive about Girardi’s chances in that piece?  He basically said he’s old and won’t mesh with Theo or the team.
Ross was mentioned as being groomed for for the job and Espada was called as a rising star and his negative was spun as a positive.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2019, 07:58:33 am by CUBluejays »

CurtOne

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27376
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #346 on: October 16, 2019, 11:20:07 pm »
Girardi has resigned his position with MLB-tv and expects a managing job somewhere.

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17063
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #347 on: October 17, 2019, 12:24:57 am »
I'd bet on the Mets but I wouldn't totally write us off there.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17383
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #348 on: October 17, 2019, 08:29:56 am »
Mets or Phillies for Girardi.

Girardi just doesn’t fit with the other candidates that the Cubs are interviewing or wanted too. It is like in football recruiting, if a kid lists SEC schools and Notre Dame he isn’t going to Notre Dame. My hunch is that Girardi was interviewed  to dig for info on how the Yankees do things and to keep Kaplan from blasting the Cubs for not interviewing him.

My opinion is that it will be Ross, unless Espada knocked their socks off in the interview.
Agree Agree x 2 View List

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17383
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #349 on: October 17, 2019, 10:53:29 am »
Cubs reorganized player development


Craig Breslow was named Director of Pitching from Director of Strategic Initiatives.

Justin Stone was named Director of Hitting

Jaron Madison was moved from Director of Player Development to a Special Assistant role and that will be more of a scouting role.

Jeremy Farrell was moved from minor league coordinator to Assistant Director of Player Development

Matt Dorey moves from Director of Amateur scouting to Senior Director of Player Development

Bobby Basham was name Director of Player Development.  He was Director of Special Projects/Assistant Director of Player Development

Cubs are looking for a Biomechanics analyst as well to loop into the Hitting/Pitching development and they still need somebody for Director of Amateur Scouting to run the draft/IFA.

Eno Sarris
@enosarris
Justin Stone has worked with Mike Tauchman among others, Craig Breslow is a great director of pitching imo. Here’s the news.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2019, 11:02:52 am by CUBluejays »
Informative Informative x 1 View List

CurtOne

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27376
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #350 on: October 17, 2019, 10:57:44 am »
Peter Principle

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17383
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #351 on: October 17, 2019, 11:26:02 am »
Peter Principle

People are calling it just a reshuffling of deck chairs, but I'm not so sure.

Stone/Breslow/Basham seem to me more analytic/tech orientated with Dorey filling the more traditional scouting perspective in PD.  To me it seems that the Cubs are moving out guys that may not have embraced all the tech advances, but that they still value their scouting ability in McLoud and Madison.  It seems like the Cubs made huge strides in their pitching development and hopefully Stone can spur the same in hitting.  The ASD hire is likely coming from outside and I think that will be even more telling.  Is it going to be a scout or somebody that blends everything.

Ron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8446
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #352 on: October 17, 2019, 12:16:25 pm »
Reading tea leaves is an interesting and challenging process.  I admit that I am no good at it.

craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13194
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #353 on: October 17, 2019, 12:56:21 pm »
Thanks for info on organizational changes, Blue.  That's a lot of repositioning; seems like they've been repositioning a lot of guys almost every year.  Not sure what to make of that.  I can't remember, but it seems like they've got a new scouting director almost every year.  One year McLeod, one year Dorey, one year Madison.  Very little continuity, it seems.  No idea why.  Guys excelling and getting promoted?  Guys failing and getting replaced?  Who knows.  Also unclear how many of the shuffles are meant for the welfare of the Cubs, versus personnel development in the front office?  A guy aspiring to become a GM may want to experience all kinds of different front-office roles, so maybe you bop guys around to diversify their experience? 

Blue, I'd like to think that smart guys ought to be able to learn new things.  *IF* Theo and Hoyer are hypothetically smart, and have hypothetically been able to attract smart guys, shouldn't those  smart guys be able to appreciate the value of tech advances, and train themselves up to optimally utilize every tool available?  If they aren't smart enough to do that, maybe Theo and his people just aren't smart enough to keep up? 

craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13194
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #354 on: October 17, 2019, 01:13:23 pm »
Another "not keeping up?" question....  The Cubs and Cubs-reporters seem really fired up about their pitch lab and it's value.  So, "if" the pitch lab is so valuable, why do they only have that in Arizona, where a limited fraction of pitchers have access?  Might it not be appropriate to have one in Chicago, where big-league Cubs could more easily visit it, and Hottovy?  Where Midwest-League Cub pitchers could more easily visit?  Maybe Southern-League and Midwest-League guys, too? 

I don't know how it works.  But it seems like for all the benefits they talk about, those have tended to apply to offseason stuff; to new pickups (Wieck comes over, spends a week in the pitch lab, and then starts to apply); to D-caliber prospects (Effross, etc..), etc..  Might it not be helpful to have one in Chicago?  If Edwards is in a slump, give him a one-week break to fool around in the pitch lab?  If Q's curve isn't working, what if you sent him over to pitch lab to try to figure out why?  Might The Professor like to do a between-starts throwing session in there, to do some experimenting? 

I guess I'm just thinking that having an on-site pitch lab where big-league players could do some maintenance checkups, or could get some quantification on some things they're playing with or wondering about, might that not be helpful?  I'm just thinking that whatever value it has, being able to visit a couple of times in February is one thing; but I assume finesse mechanical factors probably tend to drift over the ensuing 7 months.  So being able to pop in more conveniently to a Chicago-based lab and do some maintenance measurements might be helpful? 

Not sure how hard and competitively you need to throw for it to be useful?  Maybe Hendricks doing a between-starts throwing session doesn't help, because he's not throwing as seriously as in a real game?  And Lester can pump it up to 89-91 with game-day adrenaline; but the data in a pitch lab when he's at 83-84 might not be that valuable?  Beats me. 

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17383
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #355 on: October 17, 2019, 01:19:50 pm »
Dorey was been the director of Amateur Scouting since 2014 and Madison has been the Director of Player Development since 2014.  The amount of freedom Dorey had under McLeod is an open question.

The player development heads have always seemed to have scouting background and that seems to be changing with this reshuffling and it isn't clear how the Director of Player Development is going to interact with Stone and Breslow. 

Appreciating and understanding and implementing are two different things.  I can still kick some butt in a general and organic chemistry class, but if you through me into a physical chemistry class it would be a struggle bus.  2 years ago this stuff was like general chemistry and now it is physical chemistry and moving fast into advanced physics.  It just requires a different skill set than what it used too.  I think the Cubs have made a huge gain in the pitching area and are just starting in the hitting arena, but they are playing catch up.  They have to catch and surpass the Astros, Yankees and Dodgers. 

Ron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8446
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #356 on: October 17, 2019, 01:46:38 pm »
Blue, I'd like to think that smart guys ought to be able to learn new things.  *IF* Theo and Hoyer are hypothetically smart, and have hypothetically been able to attract smart guys, shouldn't those  smart guys be able to appreciate the value of tech advances, and train themselves up to optimally utilize every tool available?  If they aren't smart enough to do that, maybe Theo and his people just aren't smart enough to keep up? 

This is certainly a new perspective. I don't recall anyone previously suggesting that Theo and those he has brought into the organization are not "smart enough."   As an aside, I just saw a tweet about one of these guys.

Paul Sullivan
@PWSullivan
Cubs' Director of Pitching, former pitcher Craig Breslow, has a 2000 degree from Yale in molecular biophysics and biochemistry.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17383
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #357 on: October 17, 2019, 02:41:59 pm »
David Kaplan
@thekapman
Houston source tells me Astros coach Joe Espada had a sensational interview w/Cubs front office. “He gave Theo + Jed a lot to think about. They really liked him + came away exceptionally impressed. Was it enough to overcome David Ross’s relationship w/Theo and Jed? We’ll see.”
Like Like x 1 View List

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17383
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #358 on: October 17, 2019, 02:46:17 pm »
Another "not keeping up?" question....  The Cubs and Cubs-reporters seem really fired up about their pitch lab and it's value.  So, "if" the pitch lab is so valuable, why do they only have that in Arizona, where a limited fraction of pitchers have access?  Might it not be appropriate to have one in Chicago, where big-league Cubs could more easily visit it, and Hottovy?  Where Midwest-League Cub pitchers could more easily visit?  Maybe Southern-League and Midwest-League guys, too? 

I'm not 100% certain what is in the pitch lab, but the equipment is likely to be at the major league level.  I think the value of having it in Arizona having a place where guys can go and apply in low leverage situations.  I bet the slom-mo camera's, trackman etc are all available at each minor league team and traveling with the Cubs.

Ron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8446
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #359 on: October 17, 2019, 03:29:24 pm »
I'm not 100% certain what is in the pitch lab, but the equipment is likely to be at the major league level.  I think the value of having it in Arizona having a place where guys can go and apply in low leverage situations.  I bet the slom-mo camera's, trackman etc are all available at each minor league team and traveling with the Cubs.

Assuming the pitch lab integrates actual pitching, which I believe it does, being able to pitch outside year round is presumably an advantage.