Author Topic: Cubs in '20  (Read 49506 times)

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25895
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #705 on: November 10, 2019, 09:42:44 pm »
The free agent catcher market looks pretty terrible to me. Grandal is very good. But the next best catcher on the market is...d'Arnaud? Castro? Chirinos? It's Grandal as the only starter and a lot of pretty good back-ups.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/08/2019-20-mlb-free-agents.html

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #706 on: November 10, 2019, 09:50:48 pm »
Damn I wouldnt trade Contreras.

He should be our Yadier Molina.

brjones

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25895
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #707 on: November 10, 2019, 09:51:02 pm »
On the other hand, catching is pretty bad around MLB right now. Maybe a free agent market with a top five catcher and several guys you don't mind starting in 80 games is a strong market.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17381
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #708 on: November 10, 2019, 10:25:22 pm »
I think it is a strong market to get a back up. Getting Willson for $4.5 would be a steal vs what Grandal will get. Through in that Amaya could be ready in a year.

Deeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17060
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #709 on: November 10, 2019, 11:48:29 pm »
If the catcher free market is loaded, why would a team trade to get Contreras instead of signing a free agent?

$$$$$

Plus, most of those options are more relevant to us as complements to Caratini rather than premium frontline catchers.  The only one who probably fits that description is Grandal, and Contreras will be a lot cheaper (and younger) over the next three years.

DelMarFan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #710 on: November 11, 2019, 10:51:25 am »
Quote
Schwarber and Hoerner for Merrifield?  Just say no.

https://www.cubsinsider.com/2019/11/09/cubs-trade-rumors-whit-merrifield-will-be-priority-match-exists-involving-infielder-and-outfielder/

Does that guy actually know more than any of us?  Since it's the offseason, I'll ask:  where does he stand in terms of being a "real journalist?"

Playtwo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8821
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #711 on: November 11, 2019, 11:01:30 am »
His journalistic credentials are probably similar to mine.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17381
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #712 on: November 11, 2019, 11:12:46 am »
Altman runs the blog and has done some work with the Pelicans, but that was clearly speculation riffing off of Gonzales. 

Bennett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7414
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #713 on: November 11, 2019, 11:25:28 am »
From Around Baseball on Friday

Quote from: Bennett
The above betting lines were copied from a CubsInsider tweet.  If you go to the link that follows, what you see is quite a bit different. I'm about ready to stop looking at what CubsInsider has to say about anything.

Reb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5186
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #714 on: November 11, 2019, 04:20:10 pm »
I kinda get it why somebody would speculate about Hoerner as trade bait but, in the real world, don’t expect Theo to do that—-even in a Merrifield deal, a guy that Cubs seem to covet.

With the core getting near free agency, makes little sense to deal a near-ready guy who projects as a solid regular. It’s robbing Peter to pay Paul. I don’t see it happening.

Also not keen about trading Contreras UNLESS Theo doesn’t really believe his recent Contreras comments. Suppose it’s possible that Cubs don’t really rate him that highly and figure good time to move him now. But, Theo said Contreras is a potential MVP caliber guy. Considering how few catchers have actually won a MVP, beats me why Cubs would trade a guy like that with three years of control and who seems to love playing for Cubs.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17381
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #715 on: November 11, 2019, 04:37:54 pm »
1.) You are going to have to give up something to get something.  Willson could likely bring back an amount similar to what Bryant will.
2.) He's easier to replace than Bryant.  Caratini offense is legit and he's a better framer than Willson.  Sign a defensive catcher to be the back up and the Cubs will free up some money this year.  Amaya has Willson's offensive potential and is supposed be an excellent defensive catcher as well.  He'll be at AA this year and could be ready for next year.
3.) Caratini makes a ton more contact than Willson.  He was at 78.8% and doesn't have weakness with high fastball or breaking balls.  He diversifies the offense.
4.) The Rays need a catcher and right handed power and have a ton of major league ready arms that the Cubs need. 
Agree Agree x 2 View List

craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13186
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #716 on: November 11, 2019, 04:49:41 pm »
...Also not keen about trading Contreras UNLESS Theo doesn’t really believe his recent Contreras comments. ... beats me why Cubs would trade a guy like that with three years of control and who seems to love playing for Cubs.

https://theathletic.com/1363480/2019/11/10/why-trading-willson-contreras-could-help-the-cubs-extend-their-contention-window/

The Athletic article which suggests Contreras trade might make sense. 

I'm not sure the article gives a super compelling reason to trade Contreras.  Basically the logic builds on several things:
1.  Process of elimination.  Theo said he wants to trade somebody and shake things up.  But Schwarber and Bryant won't bring much, and you don't want to trade Rizzo or Baez.  So, that leaves Contreras. 
2.  Contreras has much more trade value than the other four.  Because he's got 3 years of control instead of only two, and because of supply and demand for catchers. 
3.  Sharma likes Caratini, and thinks that offensively he'd not be that large a dropoff from Contreras.  Plus he's a different batting profile from Contreras and the other three non-Rizzos.   

I think your scouting question cuts to the heart of the issue, though.  Contreras has been a chronically awful framer; do Theo and Ross think he's really improved, and that he'll be only modestly bad in that his worst aspect?  Or is all the MVP-candidate, improved-framer stuff just salesmanship?  Who knows? 

I think Ross has to be a factor here.  He's a huge believer in the little things of catching, and is very detailed and stuff.  So perhaps he's not a fan of the Contreras profile?  If Ross is daily frustrated with Contreras, maybe they figure now is the time while he's still got 3 years. 

But yeah, the whole question just kind of puzzles me.  Theo talks up what he's going to do to improve the team, shake things up, etc..  But you've only got 5 guys, and I'm not sure it actually makes sense to trade ANY of them. 

I think it's entirely possible that once we get to spring training, the changes are on the margins, not at the core.  No major FA signings; no major trades of any of our five guys; just some changes on the edge.  Which, personally, I think might be the wisest and OK.  (Other than the keep-Q decision, which of course I don't like and think is a waste of discretionary budget.)

Reb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5186
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #717 on: November 11, 2019, 05:09:53 pm »
1.) You are going to have to give up something to get something.  Willson could likely bring back an amount similar to what Bryant will.
2.) He's easier to replace than Bryant.  Caratini offense is legit and he's a better framer than Willson.  Sign a defensive catcher to be the back up and the Cubs will free up some money this year.  Amaya has Willson's offensive potential and is supposed be an excellent defensive catcher as well.  He'll be at AA this year and could be ready for next year.
3.) Caratini makes a ton more contact than Willson.  He was at 78.8% and doesn't have weakness with high fastball or breaking balls.  He diversifies the offense.
4.) The Rays need a catcher and right handed power and have a ton of major league ready arms that the Cubs need.

Yeah, I know that Bleacher Nation just ran a piece headlining Contreras and the Rays.

This is what Theo said about Contreras after this season:

“Shame on us if we can't continue his development at the big league level, because this is like the most tooled-out, athletic catcher who has a huge heart and cares and wants his pitcher to succeed as well...the best version of Willson Contreras is an MVP candidate, a difference making catcher.”

If Rays want a catcher, trade them Victor Caratini. Baseball Trade Values site rates Caratini as having almost as much trade value as Contreras—seems that you agree as you point out above all the Caratini pluses. I don’t buy that but perhaps Rays agree with you and Baseball Trade Values.

I’m more in the Contreras corner as in Theo’s comments above, assuming he means what he said.

Reb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5186
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #718 on: November 11, 2019, 05:27:52 pm »

..I think Ross has to be a factor here.  He's a huge believer in the little things of catching, and is very detailed and stuff.  So perhaps he's not a fan of the Contreras profile?  If Ross is daily frustrated with Contreras, maybe they figure now is the time while he's still got 3 years.  But yeah, the whole question just kind of puzzles me.  Theo talks up what he's going to do to improve the team, shake things up, etc..  But you've only got 5 guys, and I'm not sure it actually makes sense to trade ANY of them...


Think that's a very good point. Ross obviously knows catching and he figures to have a lot to say about a catcher trade.

Cubs have Contreras and Caratini and perhaps that’s a luxury—given other club needs—and one has to go. Would be interesting to know how Ross rates these guys and what his recommendation to the brass will be.

CUBluejays

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17381
Re: Cubs in '20
« Reply #719 on: November 11, 2019, 06:01:46 pm »
Caratini doesn’t really fit the Rays need for right handed power. Keeping both Contreras and Baez makes it much harder to improve the contact on the Cubs.