Bleacher Bums Forum

General Category => Archives => Topic started by: Dave23 on April 12, 2011, 10:31:51 am


Title: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on April 12, 2011, 10:31:51 am
discuss the beloved
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AZSteve on April 12, 2011, 03:52:00 pm
Sure hope Cutler's knee is healed
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on April 13, 2011, 06:19:26 am
Nice...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on April 13, 2011, 08:33:28 pm
Cutlers knee is going to be fine.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wizard61 on April 13, 2011, 08:58:22 pm
Sure, but for how long?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on April 13, 2011, 09:05:48 pm
His knee will have no ill effects from that injury.  Now if our O line continues to suck and another big fat guy lands on it he may not be as lucky next time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on April 13, 2011, 09:50:58 pm
For the love of God let Tice draft somebody to stick in front of him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on April 14, 2011, 07:59:47 am
And let him get someone in the first 3 rounds, not only in the seventh or UFA...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on April 16, 2011, 02:00:16 pm
http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/news/story?id=6328599&utm_source=bleacherreport.com&utm_medium=referral

McMahon talking about the way the Bears handled Cutlers injury..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on April 17, 2011, 01:36:46 am

 WE are at the mercy of angelo and God knows where that may lead.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 17, 2011, 08:44:39 pm
Which is why certain of us wanted him out of here along with Lovie
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on April 18, 2011, 01:03:14 am

 Didnt and wont happen as far as we got last year.

 We jumped back into it bigtime with those guys at the control panels.

 So now at 29 do you trade up to get a great OL (rare) or trade out of the first completly to snag a DT later? (common)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 18, 2011, 05:37:39 am
Trading down is all he knows how to do and he cant even do it as good as Jerry Jones.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on April 18, 2011, 08:58:14 am
This mock has us trading our first and third with KC to pick up Costonzo.

http://www.gbnreport.com/2011projection.html
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 18, 2011, 09:51:22 am
Spending our 3rd to trade up 8 spots and draft Costanzo would be a big mistake.  How did that last OT from Boston College work out for us again?

You notice in that same mock that Carimi lasts till 31.  Why not stay at 29, take Carimi and keep our 3rd rounder?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 18, 2011, 11:43:48 am
Angelo has never traded up that I know of.  To me it would be a shock to see that happen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on April 18, 2011, 11:54:44 am
Didn't he trade up a couple spots to get Grossman?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 18, 2011, 11:57:19 am
Indeed he did trade up into the 1st round to get Grossman...  who on every other team's board was no more than a mid-2nd round value.

Smooth move.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on April 18, 2011, 12:05:06 pm
I think he traded down from #4 with NYJ to get #14 and #22.
He took Haynes at 14 and Gross at 22.

I think he has traded up in later rounds, I think Justin Gage.
I think in the early rounds he feels like it costs too much and I usually agree.

If giving up a 3rd rounder this year will let us protect Cutler's blind side then pay the man.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on April 18, 2011, 12:47:18 pm
Rex took them to the Super Bowl - don't forget
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 18, 2011, 12:48:50 pm
The way I see it, if we're giving up our 3rd to move up a few spots for a LT, we're taking the position that our OL is only one player away...  and that that player is a LT.  Clearly that is not the case with our OL.  Not to mention that there is hardly a consensus opinion that Costanza will step in from Day One as a team's starting LT and in fact there are plenty of opinions out there to the contrary.

Seems to me taking best available OT with our 1st round pick and then using our 3rd round pick on an interior OL is the more sensible solution.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 18, 2011, 01:32:30 pm
I think he traded down from #4 with NYJ to get #14 and #22.
He took Haynes at 14 and Gross at 22.


Yup thats the way I remember it
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on April 18, 2011, 01:39:45 pm
What a waste of a number 4 that was..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on April 18, 2011, 01:49:22 pm
And the guy that NYJ got @ #4 was a bust too right?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 18, 2011, 06:24:21 pm
What a waste of a number 4 that was..

Angelo has had 1st-round picks in the top 5 (Cedric Ben$on), mid-round (Haynes, Chris Williams, Grossman) and the bottom (Greg Olsen, Marc Colombo).  Out of all those, only Olsen has come close to returning value and even he is taking his sweet time. 

No matter where you put Angelo in the 1st round he is pretty much inept which I'm sure is a big reason the McCaskey's green-lighted the Cutler trade.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on April 18, 2011, 07:45:04 pm
Nice Board.  Glad to read some Bear's talk!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on April 18, 2011, 09:53:33 pm

Seems to me taking best available OT with our 1st round pick and then using our 3rd round pick on an interior OL is the more sensible solution.

 Yeah...convince angelo to go OT-DT-OG in the first three.

 If by some outside chance that happens...what to do with the bottom 3?

 WR? DB? ??? Toubs gotta get his two cents in there somwhere.

 I wonder if Toub still has the same kind of muscle with Marinelli,Tice, and Martz on board?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on April 19, 2011, 06:43:00 am
If Angelo goes OT,DT,OG in the first three, he could go OT,DT,OG in the last 3 just to hedge his bets :-)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 19, 2011, 08:21:56 am
Angelo will take a LB in those bottom 3 rounds somewhere. Bet on it. If for no other reason than STs. And probably a CB or S too, for the same reason.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on April 19, 2011, 11:53:04 am
Angelo will take a LB in those bottom 3 rounds somewhere. Bet on it. If for no other reason than STs. And probably a CB or S too, for the same reason.

True...he grabs a LB nearly every draft it seems.  This might be a year to start looking for a guy for the middle.  This is Urlacher's 10th or 11th year coming up, right?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 19, 2011, 12:51:50 pm
Yep. Urlacher played the best in 2010 that he has for several seasons but I think any more than about 1 more year like that has to be considered borrowed time at this point in his career.

I know we need to get #54's replacement in the pipeline but I would really rather pass on that this year and focus on our more pressing needs in the trenches...  then maybe come back in the 2012 draft and spend our 2nd rounder on a MLB or even our 1st if there's a true stud out there to be had.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on April 19, 2011, 01:15:16 pm
I agree that w need to start thinking about Urlacher's replacement. He's got some miles on those bones..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 19, 2011, 01:19:25 pm
Me too but I dont feel this is the year to draft one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on April 19, 2011, 05:06:09 pm
Bears to open vs. Falcons, visit Packers on Christmas

Brad Biggs/Tribune reporter

4:57 p.m. CDT, April 19, 2011


In a year in which the Chicago Bears are scheduled to travel to London for their first-ever regular season game in Europe, the team has four consecutive games vs. AFC West opponents and closes with division rivals Green Bay and Minnesota.

The NFL will release the 2011 schedule at 6 p.m. but an advanced look at the schedule provided to the Tribune shows they open the season at Soldier Field Sept. 11 against the Atlanta Falcons in a matchup of division champions from last season. It marks only the fourth time in 12 years the Bears will open at home.

They will then travel to New Orleans in Week 2 and return home to host the Super Bowl champion Green Bay Packers in Week 3. Former Bears linebacker and defensive coordinator Ron Rivera will bring in his Carolina Panthers for a visit in Week 4.

The Bears then play at Detroit on Monday, Oct. 10 on ESPN’s “Monday Night Football,” the first prime time appearance for the Lions since Week 3 of the 2001 season. That game is followed by another prime time appearance for the Bears as they will host Minnesota on Oct. 16 in NBC’s national broadcast. That gives the team a home game before the Oct. 23 game vs. the Tampa Bay Buccaneers at London’s Wembley Stadium.

Following the trip to England, the Bears are off on the weekend of Oct. 30. The Bears play the Eagles on “Monday Night Football” on Nov. 7. Then, they host the Lions Nov. 13 before a string of four straight games vs. the AFC – vs. San Diego, at Oakland, vs. Kansas City and at Denver in Week 14 in quarterback Jay Cutler’s first regular season game there since the trade.

The Bears host Seattle in Week 15 and close out at Green Bay on NBC in prime time on Dec. 25 and at Minnesota Jan. 1.

The NFL’s current labor dispute leaves football hanging in the balance. The league announced if an agreement is not reached by Aug. 1 the game in London will be moved to Tampa and the Bucs’ Raymond James Stadium.

Week 1 ATLANTA

Week 2 at New Orleans

Week 3 GREEN BAY

Week 4 CAROLINA

Week 5 at Detroit

Week 6 MINNESOTA

Week 7 vs. Tampa Bay at London

Week 8 OFF

Week 9 at Philadelphia

Week 10 Detroit

Week 11 SAN DIEGO

Week 12 at Oakland

Week 13 KANSAS CITY

Week 14 at Denver

Week 15 SEATTLE

Week 16 at Green Bay

Week 17 at Minnesota
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on April 19, 2011, 06:20:34 pm
unless they move that London game it looks like no games in person for me this year
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on April 19, 2011, 07:02:53 pm
Love that schedule.  If the TV stations follow the usual pattern I should be able to see 14 of 16 games.  If so, bye, bye Sunday Ticket this season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on April 19, 2011, 07:35:45 pm
The Bears will be visiting Wisconsin on another significant date on the calendar.

The official schedule has been released, and it consists on Week 16 of the Packers hosting the Bears on Christmas Night.

The 8:20 p.m. ET game will be the only contest played on Sunday, December 25.

This sucks for the Bears.  Playing in December in GB at night is especially bad for a traveling team.  Leaving home on Christmas Day is just an added problem.  Why do scheduler's do this?

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on April 19, 2011, 08:06:52 pm
wow, the 1st 3 weeks are brutal, but not much better after that really.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pistol on April 19, 2011, 09:27:22 pm
That schedule is too light on road games in the Southeast.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on April 20, 2011, 07:27:46 am
Looks tough. Agree that the first 3 weeks are no walk in the park..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on April 20, 2011, 07:28:28 am
Aren't I the sh*t, I'm a junior member..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on April 20, 2011, 08:11:29 am
Better to start the season with some tough teams on the schedule...

Nice to have the bye week mid-season
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 20, 2011, 08:40:13 am
I think this is actually the friendliest schedule we've had in a few years.

The bye week is extremely well timed, and even though those first 3 games are a mutha, 3 of our first 4 are at home which will allow the Bears to get their feet under them in Soldiers (literally), and assuming they play well and win, build up a lot of positive vibe with the home crowd early in the season.  I like the fact that we are playing 3 quality teams right out of the chute... By the end of that 3rd game we should have a very clear read on if these 2011 Bears have the talent and brains to repeat in the playoffs or if it was all just smoke and mirrors last year as many want to clain.

Obviously the league bias for the Packers shows in us again having to go up to Lambeau late in the season, but other than that it looks like a pretty fair hand.  It's kind of weird having all four of the AFC West games lined up in one stretch but I don't see those being particularly tough matchups although the Raiders could surprise some people this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 20, 2011, 10:21:44 am
Pompeii is ****ing about the Bears having 5 preseason games...  I say, bring 'em on.

Lovie's teams are never prepared for the regular season so if a 5th preseason game forces them to do the work they don't do in training camp, then so much the better.

Our offense, especially, needs as much preseason work against live opponents as it can get.

Likewise, if the threat of being 0-3 after the first three regular season games doesn't get our boys motivated in training camp, then there's really no hope.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on April 20, 2011, 10:35:34 am
the other thing about 5 preseason games is we get to start a week earlier which means the players and coaches have an extra week to work on things that other teams don't get.

I was thinking a few minutes ago.
If there were no cap and each NFL team had to operate on their own...
Would Chicago spend more or less money on players?
Dallas, Wash and likely NYG would spend more I am sure.
What about Chicago though.
At one time I would have thought they would have spent less but not sure now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on April 20, 2011, 10:41:14 am
The first 5 of the last 7 games  look winnable, but Bears always seem to suck traveling West, so it's worriesome.  If they dig themselves a big hole in the 1st 3 weeks, it looks like they'd have a chance to dig out of it there 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 20, 2011, 10:51:29 am
The one thing that stinks about that opening schedule is that not only are they 3 very good teams, but they are all NFC teams.

Certainly we can recover from an 0-3 start...  but losing to the Falcons, Saints and Packers would severely hurt our playoff chances because the only way we are likely to make the playoffs this year is as a wildcard... and not having the head-to-head advantage against any of those teams could be devastating in a tiebreaking scenario.

I also see we have 4 night games.  That's not so great.

Cutler's return to Denver on Dec. 11 should be fun...  assuming he's not on IR by then.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on April 20, 2011, 11:15:17 am
There won't be an agreement in place between the owners and the players soon enough to allow for 5 preseason games. I'll be surprised to see 2.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on April 20, 2011, 10:02:12 pm
Pompeii is ****ing about the Bears having 5 preseason games...  I say, bring 'em on.


 I have no idea what you meant to say...BLEEP BOT took over.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 21, 2011, 08:32:12 am
The word was witch with a b.

Also, incredibly, this site hashes out the word "****" (rhymes with "ramble" and starts with g, people go to Vegas to do it).  Seriously... are the Mormons running this site or something? Weird.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wizard61 on April 21, 2011, 09:40:57 am
b-itch? g-amble? f-uck? p-issant?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on April 21, 2011, 09:54:39 am
Too bad a mod or someone cant put in a list of acceptable words. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wizard61 on April 21, 2011, 10:00:30 am
just type a dash after the first letter. it will be okay.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 21, 2011, 10:17:32 am
And yet, "suck" and "hell" make the cut.

OK, whatever. I can adapt. I'm liking the format otherwise.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on April 21, 2011, 10:50:08 am
That's me, I think it $ucks as$ that we can't type whatever. But, I'm cool with the place otherwise
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on April 21, 2011, 12:39:05 pm
Ditto. The sockcuckers!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on April 22, 2011, 02:50:17 am
The word was witch with a b.

Also, incredibly, this site hashes out the word "****" (rhymes with "ramble" and starts with g, people go to Vegas to do it).  Seriously... are the Mormons running this site or something? Weird.

 Man thats really going over the edge.

 Put JBN and Sailorgirl in charge.

 This is getting beyond stupid and even W61 has to admit it.

 Show us a list of BANNED words...we'll take it from there.

 You cant type gaamble?

 Jesus Christ...c'mon already!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on April 22, 2011, 12:22:04 pm
Quote
[
Jesus Christ
Now, that should be banned!  That's true profanity in the context used.

Vulgarity is tolerable; profanity uis not.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on April 22, 2011, 12:29:20 pm
Quote
...“Look, fans don’t buy tickets to see Virginia or Brian McCaskey,” Gould told the Chicago Tribune. “They pay to watch Brian Urlacher, Drew Brees and all the great players. This lockout is all because of the owners’ greed. I’m sorry if that sounds cold, but it is the truth.”...


True, Robby, but they don't come to see just you guys, either.  If you are not satisfied with  a multi-million dollar salary the fans will go and and see some other guys play the game who are willing.

The players have the same big-head problems that the owners do.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on April 22, 2011, 08:41:19 pm
Now, that should be banned!  That's true profanity in the context used.

Vulgarity is tolerable; profanity uis not.


 Luckily nobody elected you to be the moderator of good taste.

 As your views are unique upon yourself and not applicable to anyone else.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on April 23, 2011, 11:07:47 am
I like to read your posts, jj, but I feel that many people woudl be offended by that particular  verbiage.

Why use God's name in your complaint?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on April 26, 2011, 10:36:01 am
Report: Kristin Cavallari Gets Engaged to Jay Cutler
4 CommentsBy PopEater Staff  Posted Apr 26th 2011 04:45AM
2215194
Reality Star Kristin Cavallari is reportedly engaged to Chicago Bears quaterback Jay Cutler.

PEOPLE is reporting that the couple were on a vacation in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, when Cutler surprised Cavallari by proposing to her over the weekend.

A source is quoted saying, "He surprised her with a quick trip to Cabo to ask her to marry him."

In a recent interview, Cavallari revealed that things were going well between the couple and she mentioned she was in love with the Chicago Bears quarterback.

Cavallari, 24, and Cutler, 27, have been dating since last fall.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 26, 2011, 10:38:12 am
Well, either marriage is gonna help Jay Cutler pull his sh-it together and finally be the QB he has the talent to be...  or he'll get totally p-whipped and be worthless to the Bears (or anybody else).

Should be interesting to see.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on April 26, 2011, 11:00:53 am
(just for Sportster)   ;)

Oh sure...he's healthy enough to get engaged but can't play in the NFC championship game....quitter
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on April 26, 2011, 11:28:03 am
Good for Jay.  I wouldnt mind hookin up with Kristin...;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on April 26, 2011, 11:31:29 am
Congrats to both of them!  One word to J:  Pre-nup!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 26, 2011, 11:39:08 am
Good for Jay.  I wouldnt mind hookin up with Kristin...;)

No doubt. But if he wasn't a zillionaire NFL QB she wouldn't give a guy like him the time of day.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on April 26, 2011, 11:59:46 am
Wait, what? Hot Women are attracted to guys with money??

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 26, 2011, 12:01:44 pm
"Definitely" on the pre-nup thing.  He's making just a wee bit more money than she is... at this point in their careers, anyway.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on April 26, 2011, 01:56:54 pm
Bearhit- yeah fraid so. The amount your hot corresponds to the size of your bank account (s). Not the size of  anything else. Sad, but true.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on April 26, 2011, 02:31:34 pm
Well, either marriage is gonna help Jay Cutler pull his sh-it together and finally be the QB he has the talent to be...  or he'll get totally p-whipped and be worthless to the Bears (or anybody else).

Should be interesting to see.

Oh brother.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on April 26, 2011, 02:36:48 pm

 Just head that Robbie Gould went to Halas Hall and they told him you can walk around and have lunch but you cant use the weight room.

 Legal angles in case he gets hurt. Of course he could always slip and fall... :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 26, 2011, 02:39:06 pm
At least they let Gould in.  He was the one that ripped the McCaskeys in the Chicago papers a few days ago.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 26, 2011, 04:06:50 pm
Article in today's Tribune about Webb:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/cbsports-bears-excited-about-webbs-progress-20110426,0,4796585.story

I know there is a lot of (warranted) skepticism here about Webb, but I'm really pulling for the kid hard. He seems to have some skills, he definitely has the size, and after all the whiffs we've had on OL draft picks in the Angelo era it would be very satisfying to have one of them finally, actually work out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 26, 2011, 04:16:45 pm
Interesting to see articles on PFT about players on teams such as the Giants and Dolphins pro-actively attempting to conduct preseason business as usual as much as possible (and to the extent their respective employers will allow).

Kind of sad (but not surprising) to see that kind of player leadership initiative and dedication apparently lacking on the Bears. Robbie Gould is the only player who has been reported at Halas Hall.  The Dolphins' QB is throwing to WRs and their O-Linemen are running drills. Our QB is getting engaged and our O-Linemen are going to banquets.  Different priorities, I guess.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on April 26, 2011, 04:17:37 pm
Article in today's Tribune about Webb:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/cbsports-bears-excited-about-webbs-progress-20110426,0,4796585.story

I know there is a lot of (warranted) skepticism here about Webb, but I'm really pulling for the kid hard. He seems to have some skills, he definitely has the size, and after all the whiffs we've had on OL draft picks in the Angelo era it would be very satisfying to have one of them finally, actually work out.

 Webb and Hermen Johnson for as long as they are on the team after the draft.

 I'd like to see them both make it with Tice coaching them.

 With the draft and FA (when it comes) who knows?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on April 26, 2011, 04:58:22 pm
Gould is there to score points against the NFL not to play football.  He is a union rep and has gone on record ripping the NFL and the owners.  I lost some respect for him because of it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 26, 2011, 05:15:32 pm
Technically there is no longer a players' union so Robbie isn't technically a union rep, is he?

That being said... the last player rep the Bears had was Hunter Hillenmayer...  and we saw what happened to him.

Don't be surprised if our 6th round draft pick winds up being a kicker. Just sayin'
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on April 26, 2011, 05:43:16 pm
They are a union.  They are just pretending they aren't so they get all of the leverage then they will bargain collectively again but act like they aren't.  When a deal is struck the union will be back.  It is a sham and a farce and I can't believe the judge continues to look past this fact.

If they do not become a union again then football is ruined.  No draft, no salary cap or floor.  32 seperate entities and no rules about how to get players. 

They could actually paint themselves into such a corner that they won't be allowed to unionize again.  If that happens they will have killed the golden goose.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on April 28, 2011, 10:54:22 pm
Looks like it will be Webb at LT and Camini at RT.  At least when TC starts.  I am not sold on Webb as some are but the coaches seem to love him.

Williams will stay inside but he has been a major dissapintment.  Unless he can become an all pro center.  Yes the Bears ahve been talking about moving Williams to center...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on April 28, 2011, 10:59:15 pm
Webb can't be any worse than Chris Williams, Omigawd, St. Claire, Bernard Robertson...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 28, 2011, 11:03:07 pm
We'll see if Webb can handle LT. Personally I doubt it
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on April 28, 2011, 11:06:08 pm
That is my concern as well.  My guess is they are rolling the dice that either Webb or Carimi can handle LT. 

Either way we got two big nasty SOB's at OT. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 28, 2011, 11:07:52 pm
Now they need to fix the middle cause those two monsters in Detoilet will have Cutler down every time
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on April 28, 2011, 11:09:57 pm
Still a good chance to get at least one starter on the O-line in the draft and there is always free agency. 

But yeah Suh and Fairley next to each other is going to be a nightmare.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 28, 2011, 11:12:01 pm
Fairly and Suh will collapse the middle with ease as it was last year
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on April 29, 2011, 05:42:09 am
and we won't be the only line that sees that collapse.  On paper, that Lions line looks tremendous, and I have no doubt they will be tough on the field as well
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on April 29, 2011, 05:44:11 am
Frank "two whiffs" Omiyale, your table is ready on the bench.

Two whiffs/game.  Just complete "lookout" blocks per game.  I've seen enough of that story to know the ending.  Cutler in a pile on the ground...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on April 29, 2011, 12:36:29 pm
Isn't one of the knocks on Wiliams that he has short arms? Not sure that translates well to moving to center.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 29, 2011, 01:03:23 pm
I am pretty confident that either Omiyale or Chris Williams will not be on the Bears roster when the 2011 season kicks off. Assuming it does.  It just comes down to which of those two failures Angelo is more willing to acknowledge.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on April 29, 2011, 01:35:00 pm
Omiyale is kind of pricy but he can fill in at either OT and do ok.
I still question though if Carimi can't play LT at least as good as Webb. I'd be tempted to leave Webb at RT and take our lumps at LT with Carimi.

Webb and Johnson at RG and RT would be some serious beef though. I hope Johnson has been spending as much time as he can with Tice. It would be nice to see a motivated 350lb OL with some skill on our line for once.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 29, 2011, 01:48:25 pm
Webb and Carimi at OT, Chris Williams and Herman Johnson at OG and the midget Kreutz at C wouldn't suck totally.

Replace Chris Williams' with a legit OG via FA (Carl Nicks?) and it gets even better.  Then next year, take the best C available in the draft to replace Kreutz and we're set for the next few years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on April 29, 2011, 02:18:36 pm
I know he didn't do well when given an opportunity but I thought our coaches were high on Edwin Williams at one point.
It would be interesting if Asiata or Louis or both could start at one of our interior positions. You could then keep some guys like Williams (LG,LT) and Garza (LG,C,RG)  around who can play many positions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on April 29, 2011, 02:18:54 pm
Yeah, I kind of DONT want Chris Williams at OG.  Would much prefer someone much better, even if it is one of the other back ups.  Just saying.  Backup swing tackle, maybe.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 29, 2011, 02:23:52 pm
We're gonna put Asiata, Louis, and/or Edwin Williams up against the Suh/Fairley tandem?

Ummm, no thank you very much.

Not that Garza and Kreutz are likely to fare any better.

Nav's point is well taken though about guys playing multiple positions.  Omiyale has played LT, RT and LG (although only LT with any degree of competency), Chris Williams same deal, Garza has played both OG spots, some scouts think Carimi could move inside and you also have Herman Johnson who most view as an OG even though he has a RT's massive frame.

Chris Williams and Omiyale are both essentially backup swing OTs and a roster can really only support one of those.  That's why I'm thinking we see one of them sent packing in the next few months.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on April 29, 2011, 02:28:09 pm
Lets just hope Tice can sort them all out and put them in their best positions...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 29, 2011, 02:43:05 pm
If they get a FA OG they might be decent if Johnson comes along with major improvement
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 29, 2011, 02:57:26 pm
Yeah... ideally we'd see that entire interior 3 blown up (Williams, Kreutz and Garza) and start over with big, strong, mean young guys.  Doubt it happens though.  Kreutz, if re-signed, will be the starting C and I'm certain the RG spot will remain Garza's to lose. Williams may be the only one out of the 3 that gets upgraded for 2011 unless one of the younger guys on the roster steps up big time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 29, 2011, 03:06:54 pm
I wonder if Asiata or Louis can play center
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 29, 2011, 03:10:51 pm
I wonder if Asiata or Louis can play center

Louis, maybe.  Asiata, I wouldn't count on since he's just now learning how to play OG with only 4 or 5 years of football under his belt in total as I recall.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on April 29, 2011, 03:22:08 pm
Well that Edwin Williams cant. Maybe we will see something from Louis this year. I sure hope so. He was supposed to be some diamond in the rough when we drafted him
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on April 29, 2011, 03:36:47 pm
Well that Edwin Williams cant. Maybe we will see something from Louis this year. I sure hope so. He was supposed to be some diamond in the rough when we drafted him

Same was supposed to be true of Asiata too.

IIRC both Edwin Williams and Lance Louis were in the starting lineup for that shi-bacle against the Giants that almost ended Cutler's career.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on May 01, 2011, 12:58:43 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0501-haugh-bears-chicago--20110430,0,4529786.column

My opinion of Robbie Gould is on a downward spiral.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 01, 2011, 01:06:29 pm
After the clusterflock with the Ravens I don't see how anyone can defend the McCaskeys.

They're not the ones who directly embarrassed the Bears franchise with the draft day trade fiasco, but they keep employing the guy who did.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on May 01, 2011, 01:15:51 pm
I'm not defending the McCaskeys but you don't personally attack an 88 year old woman by name who is not actively involved in running the team.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 01, 2011, 01:24:13 pm
Gould is an idiot period!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on May 02, 2011, 12:52:13 pm
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/Dave-Duerson-study-brain-damage-at-time-of-suicide-050211

Duerson did have brain damage
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 02, 2011, 01:16:55 pm
Apparently multiple concussions (even mild ones) have been linked to severe depression
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on May 03, 2011, 08:45:58 pm
Gould is one of the best kickers in the NFL.  He is the player rep.  It is his job to say crap in the paper.  When the fur starts to fly, I want him out there kicking from 48 to win the game...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 03, 2011, 09:21:44 pm
Good kicker but an idiot!  I will root for him to make every kick as a Bear.  After that he is on his own. 

You don't take shots at elderly women.  Especially when they are the owners of the company you work for.  It is stupid and idiotic. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on May 03, 2011, 10:05:09 pm
and especially when they are not actively involved in running the team.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wizard61 on May 03, 2011, 10:09:20 pm
This concussion thing will totally change the NFL within 3 years. If there is no salary cap, though, I won't be watching.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 04, 2011, 08:38:00 am
Yeah you really get the feeling that last year was the last year of NFL football as we've all grown up knowing it...  on any of a number of levels.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 04, 2011, 09:06:43 am
All because of GREED
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 04, 2011, 09:19:40 am
I would blame it more on envy.  Envy drives most of today's societal actions. 

Look at politics as a prime example: tax the hell out of wealthy people because I envy them.

You are happy with your salary until you find out your co-worker is making more money than you.
 
It is the primary motivating factor for most all of union activities. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on May 04, 2011, 09:26:02 am
dang Packrat, that kind of goes with the wise saying "the love of money is the root of all evil", I think you could also lump power/greed in there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 04, 2011, 09:38:58 am
Absolutely.

Ask any lawyer.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 05, 2011, 01:21:38 pm
Good grief:

With the addition of Gabe Camiri, the Bears have their bookend tackles for the next decade. I like the "we need to get bigger" philosophy for the O line. So, any truth to the rumors of Chris Williams playing center? I think Olin Kreutz is overrated at this point of his career; and too small. David, Oak Brook

I don't see any chance of Chris Williams starting at center this year. If the Bears did want to give Williams a new position, they would need an offseason to acclimate him. They don't have an offseason this year thanks to the labor problems. So I think their options with Williams are limited. It's possible the Bears will have Williams learn to play the position eventually and consider him as a potential successor to Kreutz, but it's not something that is going to happen soon. If this team gets its way, Kreutz is going to be snapping the ball in 2011.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 05, 2011, 01:28:35 pm
Good grief:

With the addition of Gabe Camiri, the Bears have their bookend tackles for the next decade. I like the "we need to get bigger" philosophy for the O line. So, any truth to the rumors of Chris Williams playing center? I think Olin Kreutz is overrated at this point of his career; and too small. David, Oak Brook

I don't see any chance of Chris Williams starting at center this year. If the Bears did want to give Williams a new position, they would need an offseason to acclimate him. They don't have an offseason this year thanks to the labor problems. So I think their options with Williams are limited. It's possible the Bears will have Williams learn to play the position eventually and consider him as a potential successor to Kreutz, but it's not something that is going to happen soon. If this team gets its way, Kreutz is going to be snapping the ball in 2011.

Nah, just give him a pink slip and show him to the unemployment line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 05, 2011, 03:48:26 pm
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/05/cowboys-tackle-colombo-has-500000-roster-bonus-coming/

Man oh man...  I hope Angelo doesn't decide to bring this guy back on the cheap.

All indications are that his days of productive play are effectively done.  Cowboys fans can't wait to see him leave.

As for Chris Williams, I've said it before and I'll say it again.  The drafting of Gabe Carimi effectively means the end of either Chris Williams' or Frank Omiyale's career as a Bear. With Webb and Carimi the de facto 2011 starters and presumably a real OG replacing Williams, we now have two backup swing OTs.  We only need one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 05, 2011, 04:12:13 pm
I haven't heard anything about the Bears looking at Colombo to sign.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 05, 2011, 04:41:38 pm
He is just saying that Columbo is done in Dallas and that since Angelo falls in love with his picks he might invite him back. Of course you havent heard any rumors yet
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 05, 2011, 04:53:37 pm
Not to mention, Colombo's the fuc-ker that rewarded us drafting him by leg-whipping Tommie Harris and effectively ending his career and costing us millions that we paid Tommie for nothing on top of what we paid Colombo for virtually no production either.

Maybe he'll get another chance someplace else but no way should it be in Chicago.

That being said I seriously doubt it will happen. We're at least one player long on OTs already.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 06, 2011, 07:31:15 pm
Strange comment by Hanie from Bleacher Report???:

Chicago Bears: Caleb Hanie
Jamie Squire/Getty Images Jay Cutler is the Bears quarterback, even if Cardinals defensive tackle Darnell Dockett tweeted, “If I'm on chicago team jay cutler has to wait till me and the team shower get dressed and leave before he comes in the locker room! #FACT."

Hanie became a household name in last year’s NFC championship game, but it’s a small house. But in almost leading the Bears to victory in that game, Hanie showed he has the skills and potential to be a starting quarterback (or at the least, a very good backup), and that is a very precious commodity.

The Bears also just drafted another developmental quarterback in Nathan Enderle, giving more reason to see if Hanie could net them some profit on their initial investment.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 06, 2011, 08:52:17 pm

 Well here the fuuck we go again...OL in DISORDER...at least until game 5.

 Carimi-C.Williams-Kreutz-Johnson-Webb

 Theres the young OL all of us have been after...outside of Kreutz.

 Can any outside of Kreutz be rotated to see what they do best?

 Sure. Why in the fuuck not?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 06, 2011, 09:49:57 pm
Kruetz is not even a Bear anymore.  They will ahve to re-sign him once the labot dispute is over to get him back. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 07, 2011, 12:14:07 am
I don't know that Omiyale is going anywhere.  In fact, one potential O-line could have Carimi playing guard and Omiyale staying at LT.  Even if we go with a Webb/Carimi combo Omiyale can play 4 spots on the O-line as a backup.

As for Chris Williams, he's probably the 4th tackle which means he better beat somebody out at guard.  He'll have plenty of competition with Louis, Johnson, Garza and Williams and whoever the Bears eventually sign.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 07, 2011, 03:35:37 am
Supposedly Garza can also play center, not that I am anxious to find that out first hand. I still look for an undrafted OL FA signing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 07, 2011, 09:52:50 am
Garza at C would be a 1-season stopgap at best.  He is just about as used-up as Kreutz is. And I don't see this year's FA market exactly dripping with young talented centers.

We really should have picked up Kreutz' replacement in this year's draft. That 3rd round pick we spent on the project FS would have been the perfect opportunity... but since that didn't happen we'll have to either a) re-sign him and hope he's no less effective than he was last year (which was still marginal), or b) let him go and count on somebody in-house as a 1-year stopgap and then make C a top priority in next year's draft as he will need to be a guy that can start from Day One.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 07, 2011, 10:09:03 am
Garza at C would be a 1-season stopgap at best.  He is just about as used-up as Kreutz is. And I don't see this year's FA market exactly dripping with young talented centers.

We really should have picked up Kreutz' replacement in this year's draft. That 3rd round pick we spent on the project FS would have been the perfect opportunity... but since that didn't happen we'll have to either a) re-sign him and hope he's no less effective than he was last year (which was still marginal), or b) let him go and count on somebody in-house as a 1-year stopgap and then make C a top priority in next year's draft as he will need to be a guy that can start from Day One.

You are  probably right, But, OTOH, I didnt think they could even find an OT past the 5th round last year and came up with Webb in round 7. It seems that the Bears feel that finding as well as paying offensive lineman should be quite an easy task and that our great coaching staff can just mold them. So, whether we fans feel confident that a decent center can be found, I firmly believe the Bears feel that they either already have one on the roster or that anybody can do the job. And wasnt Hilgenberg a defensive guy converted to center or was that Bortz who was a defensive player? The Bears have never had a high regard for offensive lineman.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 08, 2011, 07:33:11 am
Pretty sure that was Bortz, Hilgenberg was always a center.  Also, don't forget Big Cat a few years later
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 08, 2011, 06:51:09 pm
There's a couple FA centers that didn't get drafted, one of which is Jake Kilpatrick of TCU.

Rich Gosselin came up with this list of the highest-rated players at each position on his board who were not drafted:

QB Pat Devlin, Delaware

HB Derrick Locke, Kentucky

FB Henry Hynoski, Pitt

WR Dane Sanzenbacher, Ohio State

TE Schuylar Oordt, Northern Iowa

T  Willie Smith, East Carolina

G  Ray Dominguez, Arkansas (Gosselin thinks he's the best of the undrafteds).

C  Kris O’Dowd, Southern Cal

DE Ugo Chinasa, Oklahoma State

DT Ian Williams, Notre Dame

OLB Jeremiah Hunter, Iowa

MLB Nick Bellore, Central Michigan

CB Niles Brinkley, Wisconsin

S  DeAndre McDaniel, Clemson

K Adi Kunalic, Nebraska

P  Chas Henry, Florida
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on May 08, 2011, 10:46:57 pm
The centers for Oregon State (Linnenkohl?) and Oregon are both worth a look
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 08, 2011, 11:04:43 pm
No rookie center is going to be able to do the job especially with out a training camp.  They have to re-sign Kruetz and get someone on the roster this year to learn.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 08, 2011, 11:49:21 pm
I don't think Jay Hilgenberg was drafted.  And I also don't think he started his first year either. 

With all the unsigned FAs on the team and only 5 rookies a couple rookie FAs might make the team this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 09, 2011, 12:16:22 am

 Jake Kilpatrick TCU won the Rimington Award as the nations best Center in 2010.

 How come he wasnt drafted?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 09, 2011, 08:27:14 am
The centers for Oregon State (Linnenkohl?) and Oregon are both worth a look

See thats what I am saying. Somebody will materialize that was undrafted. I am sure Tice is on the road checking guys out as we speak.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 09, 2011, 08:32:13 am
Interesting question on Kirkpatrick (TCU C) as I recall his name being linked to the Bears in at least a couple of mock drafts.

Near as I can figure, this was not considered a terribly strong draft for centers, and it may be that there just weren't that many teams considering that position as a need for this year.  When they looked at need vs. value they figured they were better off sticking with what they had and spending their draft picks elsewhere.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 09, 2011, 08:34:00 am
The C from USC was highly rated a couple of years ago but his medical record is a mile long.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 09, 2011, 09:35:25 am
Word was that Kirkpatrick was small at 6-1 7/8 300 (he's bigger than Kreutz) and had short arms.

He'll be invited to somebody's camp.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 09, 2011, 09:53:32 am
Short arms don't bother Angelo (see Chris Williams).

Would be very surprised if Kirkpatrick, Linnenkohl or the like don't get a look by the Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 09, 2011, 10:53:46 am
Short arms don't bother Angelo (see Chris Williams).

Would be very surprised if Kirkpatrick, Linnenkohl or the like don't get a look by the Bears.

Same here, very surprised
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on May 09, 2011, 11:45:14 am
I expect they want to get bigger and they also want guys who can play more than one position.
An OL that is 6'2 with short arms you can't play much more than C, TE or FB
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 09, 2011, 12:23:48 pm
I expect they want to get bigger and they also want guys who can play more than one position.

This is exactly why we're kind of an an odd position with Kreutz. He is clearly below the median in terms of quality for a starting NFL C. On the other hand, if we re-sign him, we are pretty much forced to start him because it's pointless to reserve a roster spot for a backup C who can't play any other position.

We either have to re-sign Kreutz, start him, and hope that with better OGs beside him he doesn't regress any more...  or we have to let him go, plug in someone new and hope for the best.  There really is no third option as far as he's concerned. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 09, 2011, 01:53:59 pm
I expect they want to get bigger and they also want guys who can play more than one position.
An OL that is 6'2 with short arms you can't play much more than C, TE or FB

That would be ideal, somebody like Pouncey who could play OG and C.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on May 09, 2011, 07:03:19 pm
Rex also took you to the bottom.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on May 09, 2011, 10:14:43 pm
I still believe Rex's problem had more to do with our line than his brain. I think if he got behind a decent line with a running game he could make teams pay. As much as I dislike Wash, I would like to see him do well. All that being said, he isn't Jay Cutler.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 09, 2011, 10:22:29 pm
Any QB can succeed with a great o-line and awesome offensive weapons.  Cutler its three times the QB Grossman can ever be.   He has a better height, athleticism and arm strength.

Give Rex the protection and the receivers with a running game and he could be an ok QB.  Give Cutler the same things and he can be a great one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wizard61 on May 09, 2011, 11:10:44 pm
Rex had some fantastic games. He has to be one of the most hit-or-miss QBs in history.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 10, 2011, 08:40:20 am
Rex and Jay Cutler have a lot of the same tendencies, particularly the maddening inconsistency and especially the W-T-F throws that kill your team at the worst times.

The difference being, Cutler has enough athleticism to counterbalance a lot of his terrible plays with great ones (as we saw in several games last year), whereas Rex simply did not.  Much like Cade McNown, Rex Grossman is a great college QB who is too short, weak-armed and fragile to have any business being in the NFL.  The tools just aren't there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 10, 2011, 09:21:45 am
If Rex would get "pumped" up like Drew Brees - he might overcome some of those shortcomings
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 10, 2011, 10:30:02 am
Fumbles also became a huge bugaboo for Grossman in Chicago...  especially in the latter part of his time here.

Some of those obviously were caused by protection breakdowns but I remember several plays where the ball came out of his hand and there was no contact from a defender at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 10, 2011, 10:31:12 am
Those were all Kreutz' fault
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 10, 2011, 10:32:02 am
The fumbles that happened outside the pocket weren't Kreutz' fault.  Or were you joking?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 10, 2011, 10:45:28 am
Yeah - but Kreutz' big butt caused a few of those...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 10, 2011, 12:16:41 pm
I don't think it's the size of Olin's azz so much as how low it is to the ground. At 6-feet tall (if even), by the time he gets into his stance his butt's literally about a foot off the ground.  I'm surprised Cutler hasn't pulled a hammy getting down that far.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on May 10, 2011, 12:48:46 pm
Some were Kreutz's fault and there were definitely some WTF fumbles. If the D got to him, you always held your breath to see if the ball was out.  I don't think his hands were big enough to hang on to the thing with any contact.  Definitely a lot more Bad Rex at the end. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest118 on May 10, 2011, 01:13:49 pm
Everybody can bah Kruetz....but wait till he is gone. Yes, the kill have  dimished - but he i till a nasty MFer on the field.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 10, 2011, 01:25:33 pm
From all I've heard, Carimi will bring every bit as much "nasty" as Kreutz does/did...  with a he-ll of a lot more size to back it up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on May 10, 2011, 06:01:49 pm
I don't think Rex's arm strength was ever an issue.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 10, 2011, 07:45:06 pm
Agreed.  Weak armed is totally incorrect!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 10, 2011, 08:29:50 pm
He had an arm he just was not accurate and was not tall enough to see over his linemen.  Plus combined with his small hands he fumbled a lot. 

He could still be a succesful QB in this league if everything goes right for him. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 10, 2011, 10:02:02 pm
He needs to wear high-riser shoes to make him taller ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 11, 2011, 01:09:38 am
 Rex's problem was he wasnt Drew Brees.

 In fact in the near future Drew Brees problem is he is Drew Brees, height wise.

 You also saw what we did to the shorty DOG KILLER...height wise.

 The OL in the NFL is catching up to the height of Brady's, Rothliesburger's ...Etc.

 The taller the QB the taller the line.

 Robert Gallery would have been dismissed as a freak only a few years ago as a guard.

 Too tall.

 Now thats everyday stuff.

 Carimi is 6'7"

 Herman Johnson is 6'8"

 Webb is 6'8"

 Chris Williams is 6'6"...the runt outside of Kreutz.

 Now it comes down to a question of mobility...

 granted you have assembled the LARGEST OL ever seen by DAA BEARRSSE...

 in fact this may well be the largest OL in NFL history... :P

 but can these mothers BLOCK and PUSH THE LINE for RB holes?

 We wont know until we get there.

 I like to think that the reason we passed on another OL with the third pick,

 was because TICE had his guy signed already with Johnson.

 He did make Webb.

 Keep your fingers and balls crossed Hunnybears... ;D

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 11, 2011, 01:39:34 am

 And now we have to QUESTION THE LOGIC of having big body LT & RT's,

 who weigh in at 300lbs.+ going up against 270/290 Lb. DE's.

 DE's at that weight are going to be FASTER off the mark.

 So have LT and RT's equal the DE's weight.

 Any excess pounds just slows the LT and RT's down.

 The only place you need a widebody at is at CENTER...to stop Raji.

 And two heavy Guards to make the push along with the Center for running plays.

 At this point in time Webb is coming in at 330 lbs., at RT he is blocking swift 280 lb. DE's.

 Thats an extra 50 lbs. to move around...he's gonna lose.

 If we play him inside at guard then the 330 lbs. makes sense to be a pusher.

 Thats where TICE has to decide who goes where.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 11, 2011, 06:25:43 am
Yah, I'd concur that Rex's problem was never his arm strength.  It seemed like he lost his confidence, the fans piled on, the fumbles piled up, and it was adios.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 11, 2011, 09:01:45 am
Not arm strength so much - but total fitness...

He never appeared to be in top condition - I think that might have helped his mobility issues
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 11, 2011, 09:14:36 am
According to this article, Carimi is going to get 1st shot at LT with Webb staying on the right side:

http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post/_/id/4670496/bears-mailbag-how-about-mankins

Many scouting reports doubt Carimi has the feet to play LT at the NFL level...  and that is arguably the biggest reason he fell in the draft behind guys like Tyron Smith, Costanzo, and Solder. Hopefully they're wrong.

Of course, you still have the issue of Chris Williams at LG.  That's where you sign that mountain of a man from the Saints (Nicks?) in FA, put him next to Carimi and suddenly you have a left side of the OL with a whole lot of size and bad intentions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 11, 2011, 12:53:29 pm
Hmmmmm! Well I look at it a bit differently. Carimi is a great run blocker. We run mostly right. So, it behoves us to put Carimi at RT. Now you put a decent OG next to him one that is a good run blocker as well as decent pass blocker and you have a great running game which makes the run fakes much better and thus your passing game is much better too because the defense has to honor the run It also makes your mediocre receivers look much better.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 11, 2011, 01:04:49 pm
I agree, I'm not 100% on board with the plan to put Carimi at LT for just that reason...  are we going to be wasting one of the best parts of his game (his run blocking) and especially when Webb is supposed to have the better feet?

The only thing I can think of is maybe they feel Carimi has the edge in experience based on facing some of the best Division 1 pass rushers in the country the last 4 years vs. Webb's college career at Backwater U.

And, since Tice is one of the few Bears position coaches I trust...  actually, the only one...  if his gut tells him Carimi's worth a look at LT I'll go with that too.  I'm sure Tice will be quick to see if it's not working out, and make adjustments.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 11, 2011, 01:48:47 pm
As long as Carimi/Webb are in their best positions,  I dont really care which side they play on. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 11, 2011, 01:55:44 pm
As long as Carimi/Webb are in their best positions,  I dont really care which side they play on.

Yup. If the 7th rounder is our best LT and the 1st rounder is our best RT, so be it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on May 11, 2011, 02:10:08 pm
I'm just happy that we have options for Tice to work with. It wasn't that long ago that we were wringing our hands and praying that Angelo would draft some OL help. We may not be there yet but we're moving in the right direction.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 11, 2011, 03:13:33 pm
You know Angelo and Tice have penciled in Carimi at LT before he was even drafted.

And he'll get every opportunity in camp to win the job.   The question is can Carimi keep the job once the regular season begins.

If he stumbles look for Omiyale to take his place.  Another option might be Webb, provided they give him some reps there in TC and PS.

Another less appealing option would be to bump Carimi inside to guard if he falters at LT.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 11, 2011, 03:17:44 pm
I have to think that Carimi vs. Peppers in training camp could be worth the price of admission... if they are both motivated (and allowed) to go all-out against each other.

I really don't see Carimi collapsing under the pressure of being repeatedly schooled by Peppers (as supposedly happened to Chris Williams, thereby "ruining" him at LT). Carimi is infinitely stronger than Williams, physically and psychologically.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 11, 2011, 03:23:12 pm
Carimi is going to be the LT.  He played it in college and glad he's being inserted there.  Needs to protect Cutler's blind side!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 11, 2011, 03:50:38 pm
Please stop the LT to LG experiments already.  Just saying. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 11, 2011, 03:59:32 pm
The guy who wrote about Carimi being penciled in as the Bears LT made a good point about the level of pass-rushing competition Carimi has faced in college.  Adrian Clayborn and Ryan Kerrigan being just two of them.

He also noted that Carimi spent many practices going against J.J. Watt, who I happen to think will not come close to fulfilling his hype in the NFL but was still without a doubt a quality DE at the college level.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 11, 2011, 04:04:33 pm
And Chris Williams faced the best of the SEC for years while at Vanderbilt.

We won't know until Carimi faces real NFL competition...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 11, 2011, 04:18:06 pm
And Chris Williams faced the best of the SEC for years while at Vanderbilt.

Excellent point.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wizard61 on May 11, 2011, 04:20:42 pm
Which kinda points out the difficulty in drafting -- we cann tell about just one high profile player, it comes down to try & see.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 11, 2011, 06:55:44 pm
Against a 4-3 defense you genrally put your best OL. at LT and the defense puts their best DE against him as RDE.

With a 3-4 defense they try to get to the QB by making mismatches wherever the OL is weakest.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 11, 2011, 09:25:20 pm
The question is can Carimi keep the job once the regular season begins.

I think the bigger question is do the Bears actually believe Webb isnt ready for LT in the NFL beings he is a 7th round pick and Carimi is a 1st round pick. Thats how I see this situation developing.  But if they do put Carimi at LT they darn sure better not put him out there on an island without a defensively solid LG. They need Mankins or Nicks or somebody capable.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 11, 2011, 10:59:10 pm
If Cutler is getting consistently abused, it won't matter what round the beaten tackled was drafted in - he'll get benched or as in Chris Williams' case, end up at a new position.

But as I've said before, early on, I think the Bears will give Carimi every chance to succeed at LT.  They'll try to minimize the critical situations where he's out there on an island, much like they did with Webb, in the early part of 2010.

But as the season progresses, if Carimi is going to constantly need help from Manu/Olsen, the LG, or Forte on passing downs, more than say 25% of the time then they might have to put Omiyale at  LT.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on May 12, 2011, 07:31:27 am
O line will be critical this season. Cutler can't take another beating like last year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 12, 2011, 08:21:20 am
More news on Cutler's engagement this offseason than on his knee rehab.

So I hope that means the knee is fine.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 13, 2011, 07:13:14 am
Yeah that knee seems to be forgotten while all the stuff about the GF is more important.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 13, 2011, 09:12:44 am
Just hope he doesnt mess up the knee WITH the girlfriend.  Lets be careful out there Jay. ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 13, 2011, 09:28:58 am
She looks like she likes being on top.  I think he's OK.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 13, 2011, 10:33:11 am
She looks like she likes being on top.  I think he's OK.

Hmmmm! Experience talking there?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 13, 2011, 10:44:15 am
Or wishful thinking?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 13, 2011, 12:48:53 pm
Reverse Cowgirl actually - and she's a screamer
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 13, 2011, 01:05:59 pm
Stop, you guys are putting thoughts in my head.  ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on May 14, 2011, 12:48:49 pm
I just read the article on Lance Briggs on chicagobears.com.  It says that he was voted 92 best player in the league by his peer.  It mentioned he was only 1 of 6 Bears to be voted to 6 straight ProBowls.  I was thinking about Briggs and his place in Bears history.  To this point does he warrant Bears HOF and having his jersey retired?  What more would he have to accomplish?  Is he sniffing overall HOF?  What more does he need to do to be considered? 

Personally I think he is underrated and has been his entire career.  I use the example of the season Urlacher was injured and Briggs was the defense.  I think he is one of those rare individuals that can be the leader or the role player and do both extemely well.

I don't keep up with the kind of stats you need for HOF.  However give Briggs 2 or 3 solid years like he has had and I would like he would be considered.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 14, 2011, 01:05:31 pm
Urlacher would have to get in first.  Right or wrong that is just the way it is.  I think BRiggs and Urlacher both would need a few more productive years and a super bowl win would help also.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 14, 2011, 02:37:54 pm
The trouble with retiring player numbers is that the Bears already have so many retired numbers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 14, 2011, 04:01:09 pm
I doubt either has their number retired.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 14, 2011, 05:06:18 pm
I can understand memorializing the number WITH the name on a flag or something - but "retiring" the number forever is silly
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 15, 2011, 07:44:33 am
Really?

Guard:
It is possible the Bears will bring in a free agent here, but don't be surprised if they don't. The fallout from the selection of Carimi means Chris Williams probably will stay at guard. So both starters from last year, Williams and Roberto Garza, are returning.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 15, 2011, 03:36:35 pm
Although it wasnt mentioned specifically as a guard, it was brought out that they likely would add to the OL during FA whenever that is permitted.

Since Carimi is a tackle its assumed that the FA probably would be a guard but you never should assume anything with the Bears. And nobody is assuming that the OLman is necessarily a veteran FA. Could also be an undrafted type FA.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 16, 2011, 05:45:35 am
I don't put a lot of stock into speculation on what the Bears will do.  No one saw the Bears coming last year when FA started, and they have always been pretty guarded about who they covet, leaving it to the writers to specualate needs vs availability.  Pompei is also the person who floated the idea that moving Williams to center was a possibility - Chris that is.

We'll see...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 16, 2011, 09:08:48 am
Really?

Guard:
It is possible the Bears will bring in a free agent here, but don't be surprised if they don't. The fallout from the selection of Carimi means Chris Williams probably will stay at guard. So both starters from last year, Williams and Roberto Garza, are returning.

That would be very bad.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 16, 2011, 09:51:12 am
Chris Williams at center?

Can't say that I've ever seen a 6-6 center.  Most of your DTs and NTs are shorter squattier types and I'd think you'd want a lineman that could get underneath them.

Matt Birk...I think he's 6-6...its just not very common to have a taller guy in there, plus I doubt Williams has any experience at any level at the position.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 16, 2011, 11:03:05 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/16/jay-cutler-bears-are-locked-and-loaded-for-upcoming-workouts/

Good. That offense needs as much work as they can get.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 16, 2011, 04:32:36 pm
Especially with the 2 WR's you can't stand. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 16, 2011, 04:47:46 pm
You need a bigger hammer than that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 16, 2011, 04:52:16 pm
Chris Williams at center?

Can't say that I've ever seen a 6-6 center.  Most of your DTs and NTs are shorter squattier types and I'd think you'd want a lineman that could get underneath them.

Matt Birk...I think he's 6-6...its just not very common to have a taller guy in there, plus I doubt Williams has any experience at any level at the position.

It's pretty clear that the coaches are under directive from Bears brass to salvage Chris Williams' career by any means necessary.  He and Omiyale were both colossal (and very expensive) personnel blunders by Angelo yet the Bears seem unwilling to cut bait on either of them.

Maybe one of them can be a serviceable backup swing OT but you only need one of those... so whichever of the two can't win that battle needs to go away and open up a roster spot for a better player.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 16, 2011, 05:04:55 pm
Omiyale doesn't get much credit here.

He comes over from Carolina after playing ONE game at LT.  They put him at LG and he flops.  After some time on the bench he gets his job back and is serviceable the remainder of the season.

Next season, they play him at RT throughout the PS.  2nd game of the season, Williams gets hurt and Omiyale finishes the game and the season as our LT.

Is he an upper echelon LT in the NFL?  Nope.  Is he a better LT than Carimi, Webb, or Chris Williams?

Maybe, maybe, and hell yes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 17, 2011, 05:57:12 am
Well as you know, I am not the most critical of our Bear's players or the organization.  But I think Omiyale misses too many assignments completely.  Two is too many when they are blindside blow-ups of Cutler.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 17, 2011, 09:20:22 am
I don't disagree. 

But the Bears trusted Omiyale by leaving him out on island far more than Webb and Omiyale was often matched up against the opponent's best rusher.

I think Omiyale makes a great swing tackle and might even be in the mix at guard.  But unless Webb can take a huge step up this season or Carimi can silence his critics that he doesn't have the feet to play LT - Omiyale could return to LT.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 17, 2011, 09:39:40 am
As I recall, Omiyale looked worse in his stint at OG than Chris Williams did at that position. Quite a bit worse, in fact. I don't think a switch back to OG is in his future anywhere. Not to mention we have guys like Edwin Williams, Asiata, Lance Louis and Herman Johnson who I have to assume will all be given the chance to win a starting role on the interior OL and especially if we don't bring in a FA OG.

Omiyale's best chance to stick as a Bear is to either continue improving at LT (holding off Webb and Carimi) or worst case, backing those two young guys up as our swing T.  And if the best Carimi can do his rookie season is be our swing backup, that would have to be considered a serious disappointment for all the hype he's coming in with.

I still have to seriously question if keeping both Omiyale and Chris Williams on this team for the 2011 season is the absolute best use of roster space, or if it's more just a question of Angelo saving face. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 17, 2011, 10:54:00 am
Omiyale was horrid at LG in 2009.  But after being benched for a few games he came back and was steady.

I am not suggesting that Omiyale return to guard, but if he is the swing tackle he should be given a chance to compete at guard.   Regardless, he makes the team because of his ability to play LT or RT and if he can plays some guard that's a bonus.

Chris Williams needs to win a starting guard spot.  I guess we could keep him as a backup if he doesn't start since he doesn't cost us that much (still on rookie contract).  But I would not want him as the swing tackle - he can't play LT.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 17, 2011, 11:09:34 am
I would agree, at this point I think Chris Williams is at greater risk to lose his spot on the team than Omiyale. They have tried Williams at 3 OL spots and he has failed at both T positions was nothing better than a stopgap at LG with a lot of other young interior O-Linemen waiting in the wings and potentially a FA signing as well.  As to his contract, well yes he is still on his rookie contract but that's a rookie contract for an OT taken in the Top 15 so it's not exactly chump change.

Carimi needs to pan out big time cause so far Angelo is 0-for-2 on 1st round OTs during his Bears tenure.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 17, 2011, 11:12:10 am
Wow Dallas is in a VERY generous mood when he says Omiyale " is serviceable" at LG.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 17, 2011, 12:12:24 pm
http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/05/16/pressure-reveals/

Check out this article with stats on pressure.  Cutler was under the most pressure of any QB in the league last year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 17, 2011, 12:36:05 pm
http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/05/16/pressure-reveals/

Check out this article with stats on pressure.  Cutler was under the most pressure of any QB in the league last year.

A bottom-5 OL, average (at best) WRs, inconsistent run game and an OC who didn't adapt till nearly half the season was gone can all be blamed equally for that stat.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 17, 2011, 01:00:46 pm
Cutler was under the most pressure of any QB in the league last year.


And still managed to make it to the NFCC
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on May 17, 2011, 03:43:38 pm
Martz's QB's are always up there in sacks, and probably "pressure" as well.  Even with hall of .famers on the line in St. Louis, Warner was running for his life when he wasn't winning the SB....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 17, 2011, 04:53:09 pm
Can't blame it all on Martz and the O-line. 

In the 2nd half of the NFCC game Hanie continuously dumped it off to Forte when no one was open downfield.   He kept drives alive that led to 2 scores and was in position at the end for a 3rd.

I know that Cutler is going to make some throws most other QBs can't but you'd like to see him dump it off more when there's nothing there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 17, 2011, 05:22:43 pm
Hanie wasn't acting alone there - Martz and Lovie were involved no doubt - Cutler was lucky to be alive in week 17 - It was a good experience for Hanie and the offense - hopefully it will benefit them someday in the (new) NFL?

Arena league?

Greedy bastages!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on May 17, 2011, 05:29:37 pm
I'm saying that Cutler and the line, whatever their individual contributions to the "pressure" and sacks are going to look worse in the Martz offense.  Jay getting hit more than any other QB is on Martz, the line, and himself.  He would get hit less, everything esle being equal, in a more conventional offense.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 17, 2011, 05:53:01 pm
Rodgers was getting KILLED for awhile (was that 2009?) - he got better - his line got better - his coaches got better...

"What doesn't kill ya makes ya stronger"
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 17, 2011, 07:06:27 pm
Cutler was under the most pressure of any QB in the league last year.


And still managed to make it to the NFCC


All other factors aside, bottom line is that he produced.  The Bears played every bit as well against GB as  Pitt did.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 17, 2011, 07:42:24 pm
The Bears actually played better.  In fact if Cutler didn't get hurt the Bears would have won that game.  If Rodgers instead of Cutler got hurt it would have been a blow out by the Bears.

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 18, 2011, 05:43:48 am
I think anyone with eyes could see the pressure Cutler was under a good portion of the year.  He took a brutal beating and I think most of it was the scheme early on, combined with the dial a player selection at the oline during the first half of the season.  Against the average teams of the league, we fared well later but when the good defenses came in the pressure was still there.  But it was better (grizz readjusts his rosey glasses)  :)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 18, 2011, 06:17:20 am
Glad to see the Griz wake up from his hibernation.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 18, 2011, 08:24:35 am
The Bears actually played better.  In fact if Cutler didn't get hurt the Bears would have won that game.  If Rodgers instead of Cutler got hurt it would have been a blow out by the Bears.

 

I don't know about that.  Cutler was off that day even before he got hurt. Missed at least one easy throw to Hester early that would have been a big gain if not a TD. IMO it just wasn't gonna be his day regardless.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 18, 2011, 11:49:25 am
The Packers are always tough on D at the beginning of games.  It takes awhile to figure out what they are doing.  By the time Martz had it figured out Cutler was already out of the game.  The Bears had some success on offense with Hanie in the second half.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 18, 2011, 02:50:59 pm
The Packers are always tough on D at the beginning of games.  It takes awhile to figure out what they are doing. 

Seriously though, that game was the 3rd time in the season we had played them...  and the 2nd time in 3 weeks. Notwithstanding that Dom Capers is the best DC in the game, the element of surprise when it came to the Packers D should have been slim to none.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 18, 2011, 03:08:22 pm
I still think Cutler was hurt very early in that game.  He just wasnt putting it together.  Even if he could have come back, I doubt he would have done much. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 18, 2011, 04:13:28 pm
I still think Cutler was hurt very early in that game.  He just wasnt putting it together.  Even if he could have come back, I doubt he would have done much.

I can't remember, did he take a shot to the head early in that NFCC game? I remember at one point wondering if he had because he just wasn't sharp at all.  Especially after he had ripped up the Seahawks D just the week before.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 18, 2011, 04:42:03 pm
Cutler just stunk period in that game.  I don't buy the "he was hurt earlier" excuse.  His passes were off period.  He missed Knox on a pass that would've been a TD late in the first half and missed Hester TWICE for possible big gains or TD's.

Martz play calling was horrendous as well in that game.  Some guru.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on May 18, 2011, 05:29:31 pm
Kreutz said Cutler was hurt early as his knee was wobbling back and forth in the huddle.
I think he had it pegged as late first or early second quarter.

I would have liked to have seen them try a heavy duty knee brace.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 18, 2011, 06:30:01 pm
The Packers were bringing pressure and the Bears O-line had no answer for the first half.  They got things figures out in the second half. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 18, 2011, 06:42:53 pm
In the second half Woodson was out of the game.  Most people don't realize just what a factor he is  in Capers' system.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 18, 2011, 07:32:39 pm
By Arin Karimian, USA TODAY
 22
Comments

 
2
Recommend Bears linebacker Brian Urlacher is confident, if anything.

Last week, while participating in an NFL "Fuel Up To Play 60" event at a New Mexico elementary school, Urlacher didn't shy away from sharing his thoughts on the Bears' prospects for 2011.

"I think we're the best team in our conference," Urlacher told the Albuquerque Journal. "I know we're not the Super Bowl champs like the Green Bay Packers.

"We want to be the best in our conference and to be there, we've got to go through Green Bay."

The Bears finished 11-5 in 2010 and won the NFC North ahead of the Packers, before losing to Green Bay 21-14 in the NFC Championship Game. Still, with the NFL in a lockout and free agency frozen, it's unclear where Urlacher's optimism is coming from.

Chicago had only five picks in April's draft and addressed its offensive and defensive lines with its first two picks before selecting a quarterback -- a position that wasn't a glaring need -- in the fifth round.

See photos of: Green Bay Packers, Chicago
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 19, 2011, 05:49:41 am
In the second half Woodson was out of the game.  Most people don't realize just what a factor he is  in Capers' system.

Packy - That is a good point.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 19, 2011, 05:50:35 am
Glad to see the Griz wake up from his hibernation.

Yawn...  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on May 19, 2011, 07:19:47 am
Hibernation my as$, he's been on a long drunk..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 19, 2011, 07:52:26 am
Ooops!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 19, 2011, 08:07:44 am
Urlacher's delusional. After the draft the Lions had this year, the Bears may not even be the 2nd best team in the division, much less the best.

It's totally OK to believe you're the best team in your conference...  but when there are two games in a 3-week span that clearly proved otherwise, going on record to say so just makes you look foolish.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 19, 2011, 11:14:17 am
Any given Sunday...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on May 19, 2011, 11:34:29 am
Jay Cutler led workout.  That's great news!!
 
http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/news/story?id=6563969&campaign=rss&source=NFLHeadlines (http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/news/story?id=6563969&campaign=rss&source=NFLHeadlines)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 19, 2011, 06:20:31 pm
 Have TICE and MARTZ ever worked together before? I dont know.

 But Tice drafted Webb...signed Herman Johnson...drafted Carimi.

 These guys arent tree stumps...theyre trees.

 This is a monster OL in the NFL.

 Look at what Tice likes to have on the OL...if given a chance...his babys...

 Monsters.

 All of you knew that Webb was going to be cut in pre-season last year...

 cannon fodder in training camp and a wasted draft pick.

 And that motherfuuucking kokk suuucking Webb was a starter...

 thats Tice man, pure Tice.

 You fuucking give me Carimi in the lineup...

 theres no where we cant go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 19, 2011, 07:35:53 pm
I really doubt Webb was a Tice pick. IMHO he was an Angelo pick
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 19, 2011, 07:36:50 pm
No Tice wanted him.  He likes giants on the O-line and that is where we are heading towards.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 19, 2011, 07:57:20 pm
Urlacher's delusional. After the draft the Lions had this year, the Bears may not even be the 2nd best team in the division, much less the best.

It's totally OK to believe you're the best team in your conference...  but when there are two games in a 3-week span that clearly proved otherwise, going on record to say so just makes you look foolish.

Dude I knew you'd be complaining about something with Urly or Angelo.  You claim the Bears aren't even the 3rd best team in the NFC North based on players drafted that hasn't even played an NFL game yet.  Like some have said here countless times the draft is a crap shoot.  You can't say that the Lions are better than the Bears in your mind because of the past draft.

The Bears have a better offense, special teams, and defense than the Lions as far as I'm concerned and Urly was right about that. 

Guess now if Cutler fails this season it's because he's getting married or something.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 19, 2011, 08:07:06 pm

 If Tice had a perfect day with what is at hand it would look like this :


 Carimi-C.Williams-Kreutz-Johnson-Webb
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on May 20, 2011, 06:52:55 am
and for the umpteenth thousandth time there would be no running lanes up the middle and the other teams' DE's would be having a field day because of pressure up the middle on Cutler...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 20, 2011, 08:40:23 am
"Guess now if Cutler fails this season it's because he's getting married or something." 

Well with all the banging he is going to be doing, his blood sugar could be running low. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 20, 2011, 10:18:26 am
Can't blame him for that - hope his eyes don't go all "Aaron Rodgers" and stay that way
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on May 20, 2011, 01:06:17 pm
If Cutler fails this year the biggest culprit will be the OL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 20, 2011, 05:44:32 pm
and for the umpteenth thousandth time there would be no running lanes up the middle and the other teams' DE's would be having a field day because of pressure up the middle on Cutler...

 Do you see this as being a Kreutz thing? The best we can hope is E.Williams at C.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 20, 2011, 07:38:52 pm
There is no doubt in my mind that the Bears will be a tough opponent this season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 20, 2011, 07:40:56 pm
Has anyone noticed how old the Pitt defensive secondary has become"  They may be OK this season but unless they add some really good younger players in the black and gold they are in trouble in the future.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 21, 2011, 06:33:49 am
I laugh how the Lions are now the sexy pick to challenge the Packers.  I think we can all agree that the Vikings are going to have to reload, and the Lions given their young and promising talent should rise.  But to leap over the Bears without the benefit of lacing up the shoes, nice...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on May 21, 2011, 07:29:37 am
Do you see this as being a Kreutz thing? The best we can hope is E.Williams at C.

Yes, Kreutz has been on the downside of his career for the last five seasons or so... there have not been enough running lanes up the middle, and there has been nowhere for the Bears QB's to step up to avoid the ouside pass rush.

OK was a fine player an eternity ago in NFL parlance.  Last year he was supposedly healthy and got pushed around all over the place by younger, bigger, faster, stronger opponents.  At one time he was an excellent pass blocke,r but that skill has eroded.  He was never all that good at run blocking and now he is horrible at it. 

What I have been reading indicates he may be finished in Chicago, I hope it's true.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 21, 2011, 09:56:29 am
By making the Lions the new darling of the NFCN, that is just the kind of disprespect that usually fuels the Bears quite nicely.  Lets see...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 22, 2011, 02:38:42 pm
Yes, Kreutz has been on the downside of his career for the last five seasons or so... there have not been enough running lanes up the middle, and there has been nowhere for the Bears QB's to step up to avoid the ouside pass rush.

OK was a fine player an eternity ago in NFL parlance.  Last year he was supposedly healthy and got pushed around all over the place by younger, bigger, faster, stronger opponents.  At one time he was an excellent pass blocke,r but that skill has eroded.  He was never all that good at run blocking and now he is horrible at it. 

What I have been reading indicates he may be finished in Chicago, I hope it's true.

 I'll go crazy if you go crazy with me Stelz...

 Carimi-C.Williams-E.Williams-H.Johnson-Webb

 Thats the YOUNGEST OL in the NFL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 22, 2011, 03:22:41 pm

 Take from the stock at hand...protect the FRANCHISE.

CARIMI LT 6'7" 314 lbs Rookie

C.WILLIAMS G 6'6" 315 lbs 4 years

E.WILLIAMS C 6'3" 313 lbs 2 years

H. JOHNSON G 6'8" 360 lbs 2 years

WEBB RT 6'8" 335 lbs 2 years

No one says any of this is chiseled in stone.

Find out what works best where.

Keep the LITTLE GUYS on the left side for starters to see if they can protect the blind side.

Did anyone want YOUNGBLOODS on the OL? You got it.

Dont know where we got Edwin Williams from...Tice?

But Tice got Webb? Johnson and Carimi.

Now the problem may be Cutler is too short to pass over them.

I love that kind of problem!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 22, 2011, 04:49:44 pm
Dont know where we got Edwin Williams from...Tice?

No Angelo picked him up off the Redskin practice squad.. He was brutal
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 22, 2011, 06:25:25 pm
Police: Garrett Wolfe arrested

Michael C. Wright/ESPNChicago.com

May 22, 2011, 2:33 PM ET


Police arrested former Chicago Bears running back Garrett Wolfe in Florida early Sunday morning, charging him with retail theft, disorderly conduct, assaulting a police officer and resisting arrest, according to information released by the Miami-Dade police.

A former third-round pick and four-year veteran who has spent his entire NFL career with the Bears, Wolfe played a significant role the past two years on special teams. But the club opted against offering him a restricted free-agent tender this offseason, which means he'll become an unrestricted free agent once the NFL lockout comes to an end.

In addition, Wolfe likely will be subject to league discipline under its personal conduct policy if found guilty of the charges.

A former star at Holy Cross and Northern Illinois, Wolfe played all 16 games in 2010, carrying the ball four times for eight yards. Wolfe finished his Bears career with 72 career rushes for 282 yards and a touchdown, in addition to six kickoff returns for 125 yards.

Wolfe tied Brian Iwuh for second on the team last season in special-teams tackles (18).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on May 22, 2011, 07:02:29 pm
Funny I was quite a few posts behind since I was out of country last week.

On the Oline debate.  I too feel that we should at least try E. Williams at C. for a few games to see what effect it has on Oline.  If he doesn't work out, put Kruetz back in with the idea that new C needs to be drafted high next year.  E. Williams gets his walking papers after the season.  It is a win-win; either he pans out or you have the same guy finishing up the season that you would have had, plus you don't waste a roster spot on E. Williams.  No brainer to me.

As far as line projections.  I like Carimi at RT.  No one debates he is a great run blocker.  We run right.  I put the fat boy at ROG and run right all day long.  They say Webb has great feet but mediocre strength seems like a LT to me.

My line:  LT-Webb  LOG-FA pick up Carl Nicks (NOT Williams)  C-E. Williams  ROG-H. Johnson  RT-Carimi

Omiyale would be swing tackle, Asiata and Garza would battle it out for  back up OG spot, Kruetz would be back up C- just in case, L.Louis would be TE to take Manulua spot as blocking TE.  Remember Louis was TE in college.  C. Williams would be cut, to help afford Nicks salary.  This would leave vetern pro bowler next to Webb  and E. Williams to help.  I think Carimi would be above average RT in his first year.  H. Johnson is wild card.  But worse case scenari you go with Garza.  This line would be great!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 22, 2011, 07:07:17 pm
For the first time in a long time I trust our O-line coach to find the best guys at the right positions on the o-line.  I also suspect Ticve will become our OC should MArtz leave after this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 23, 2011, 07:50:36 am
I'm guessing Garrett Wolfe realized he's never again going to pull a six-figure salary and decided to stock up for the future.

Seriously, what's with these Angelo 3rd round picks?  Okwo, Dvoracek, Marcus Harrison, Gilbert, Iglesias, now this guy...  sheez.

Very very little long-term value coming out of those 3rd round picks throughout the years. Hard to build a good and deep roster if you don't hit on those guys more than once every 4 or 5 years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 23, 2011, 08:06:22 am
That kinda makes you wonder just what we can expect out of this years #3 pick. Thst was another shot in the dark.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 23, 2011, 08:37:05 am
Dumb sh-it...  tried to skip out on a bar tab.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/23/garrett-wolfes-misadventures-began-with-refusal-to-pay-a-bar-bill/

Tryin to get NFL "star" treatment and it didn't work out...  LOL. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 23, 2011, 09:07:01 am
What a gas. Looks like he may see some jail time
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on May 23, 2011, 12:51:54 pm
Dumb sh-it...  tried to skip out on a bar tab.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/23/garrett-wolfes-misadventures-began-with-refusal-to-pay-a-bar-bill/ (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/23/garrett-wolfes-misadventures-began-with-refusal-to-pay-a-bar-bill/)

Tryin to get NFL "star" treatment and it didn't work out...  LOL.

Must have downed a couple of glasses of stupid while he was there.  Hope he save his money, he may need it for lawyers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 23, 2011, 01:00:11 pm
My line:  LT-Webb  LOG-FA pick up Carl Nicks (NOT Williams)  C-E. Williams  ROG-H. Johnson  RT-Carimi

Omiyale would be swing tackle, Asiata and Garza would battle it out for  back up OG spot, Kruetz would be back up C- just in case, L.Louis would be TE to take Manulua spot as blocking TE.  Remember Louis was TE in college.  C. Williams would be cut, to help afford Nicks salary.  This would leave vetern pro bowler next to Webb  and E. Williams to help.  I think Carimi would be above average RT in his first year.  H. Johnson is wild card.  But worse case scenari you go with Garza.  This line would be great!

This is the most sensible approach to our 2011 OL that I've seen yet.  Keeping Kreutz around just as a backup is a bit questionable -- and I'm not convinced Edwin Williams is the long-term answer at C either -- but assuming Herman Johnson can play into his size the rest of that group is solid and huge.

The trick will be convincing Angelo to write off yet another of his OL draft picks (C. Williams) as a loss.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 23, 2011, 01:23:30 pm
Well then maybe we keep Chris Williams as swing takle and launch Omiyale. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 23, 2011, 01:57:51 pm
Well then maybe we keep Chris Williams as swing takle and launch Omiyale.

That's what I've been saying for awhile now. With the addition of Carimi, it's time for one of those other two to go. It's just a matter of whether Angelo wants to admit defeat in the draft, or FA.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on May 23, 2011, 02:24:44 pm
the problem is that as bad as Omiyale is, he plays RT and LT better than Williams or at least of what we have seen Williams play.

I have confidence Tice will put the best 5 on the field but I expect 2 of those 3 will be Chris Williams, Kreutz and Garza.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 23, 2011, 02:46:51 pm
Ok, I pick Kreutz and Garza. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 23, 2011, 03:06:05 pm
Carimi at LT is the best choice for the offensive line.  Keep Webb where he was last season and let's get this show on the road.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 23, 2011, 03:34:08 pm
RG remains Garza's job to lose. I think most of us here would love to see Herman Johnson come into camp and blow everyone else away at that position... but if the coaches have any hesitation about him after the end of the preseason, I expect it's Garza back there again for one more go-around.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 23, 2011, 03:36:13 pm
Despite many of the experts stating that Carimi's best position is RT - I think Tice and company will give him a serious shot at LT.  The problem is in doing that is that if he fails then Webb won't be getting the needed reps he would need to play the same spot.

And at this rate they won't get a lot of time to see where Carimi's best position is. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 23, 2011, 03:39:12 pm
That's the problem with the Bears O-line right now - we're hoping our young FA castoffs like Herman Johnson, Asiata, and Edwin Williams come through.  I'd put Lance Louis in that category too even though he was a draft pick.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 23, 2011, 04:03:10 pm
Lance Louis is practically an FA (6th round pick IIRC).  With his past expreience at TE and virtually the same body type, Louis seems to me like a lock-and-load replacement for Manumaleuna...  but with these coaches, who knows?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on May 23, 2011, 11:36:22 pm
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/Chicago-Bears-JT-Thomas-takes-disabled-teen-wheelchair-to-dance-052311?GT1=39002

A nice story in contrast to the Garrett Wolfe's of the NFL
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 24, 2011, 07:00:49 am
Offseason is important and we are seeing just how much with our oline.  I think things tend to get overthought, I am leaning toward the idea of installing Carimi at LT and leaving Webb alone at RT.  Take the remaining bunch and let then decide who plays at the interior.

I think we can all agree, we are in better shape having Tice on board.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 24, 2011, 08:44:51 am
The NFL Rookie Symposium has been cancelled, the first high-profile event to fall victim to the work stoppage. Tribune reports today that the Bears' first OTA (scheduled for June 3) is also likely off the table and I'm sure we'll see many similar cancellations of other teams OTAs across the league.

As the offseason/preseason becomes more and more compressed, a premium will be placed on coaches that can get their players up to speed quickly. I like our odds with Tice in this scenario, especially if we can somehow still bring in an upgrade at LG via FA.

The prospects of our air game (i.e., Martz, Cutler, Olsen and our WRs) I am not nearly as optimistic about. True we have continuity with all the players returning, however, our air game finished the season badly out-of-sync, and our inability to get yards and points through the air was the single biggest factor in the last two losses to the Packers.  Those guys need as much work together possible, but will be getting less.  Martz, hopefully, has been updating his offense out of the 1990s mindset we saw last year but unfortunately those modifications will take time and reps to implement... which are slipping away the longer this drags on.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on May 24, 2011, 08:59:18 am
I hope the game scheduled in Europe is the next thing taken off the table
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 24, 2011, 09:27:02 am
I hope the game scheduled in Europe is the next thing taken off the table

Agreed. That wouldn't upset me at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 24, 2011, 09:38:07 am
I hope the game scheduled in Europe is the next thing taken off the table

That would really make me happy
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on May 24, 2011, 10:44:25 am
Class act.  Keep him just for that. You know, I've been whining about all the arrests, I bet there's alot of this that goes unoticed because the kids just do it because it's right. I need to be more positive.     Or more drunk, I'm not sure which.  I'll have a beer and think about it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 24, 2011, 12:22:42 pm
Agreed, total class by the rookie LB.

This is still a football team and he ultimately has to earn his keep on the field. But if it comes down to a final roster spot between him and someone else of equivalent skill, I hope this works in his favor. I'm pullin for the kid, definitely.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 24, 2011, 04:43:51 pm
Agreed, total class by the rookie LB.

This is still a football team and he ultimately has to earn his keep on the field. But if it comes down to a final roster spot between him and someone else of equivalent skill, I hope this works in his favor. I'm pullin for the kid, definitely.
Class act.  Keep him just for that. You know, I've been whining about all the arrests, I bet there's alot of this that goes unoticed because the kids just do it because it's right. I need to be more positive.     Or more drunk, I'm not sure which.  I'll have a beer and think about it.

 Kind people off the field has to translate into not nice people on the field.

 If he can do that...keep him.

 Think Dick Butkus
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 24, 2011, 05:16:27 pm
I'm guessing Wolfe got the celebrity ovation in the bar...

And he said ""The drinks are on ME"

When I said that... (many years ago) everyone knew it was a joke...

But a $1500 bar tab?

Good thing nobody ever took me seriously - in a bar...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 25, 2011, 07:56:22 am
Wolfe is going to wind up dropping a lot of cash on lawyers -- not to mention restitution and potential fines, court costs, etc. that will be levied against him if charges are upheld.

Bad move, especially considering his days of drawing an NFL paycheck are probably gone for good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 25, 2011, 09:10:31 am
Probably would have been cheaper just to pay the bar tab and be done with it in the first place
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 25, 2011, 09:34:22 am
So many of these pro athletes think they should never have to pay for anything when they're out on the town.

I doubt Garrett Wolfe would get his bar tab comp'd in a Chicago bar, much less South Florida.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 25, 2011, 09:49:47 am
Sweet. Here's a Bear that gets it:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/25/matt-forte-follows-walter-paytons-lead-in-off-season-training/

I hope he has a monster year behind an improved OL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AZSteve on May 25, 2011, 09:50:16 am
tired of the "I'm entitled" mindset of athletes in general.. why well paid athletes don't pay like everybody still a mystery to me...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 25, 2011, 11:18:29 am
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on May 25, 2011, 9:25 AM EDT
 
APAll first round picks get noticed, but Bears tackle Gabe Carimi looks destined to get extra attention in Chicago because of his upbringing.

After all, he is the “Bear Jew.”

Carimi’s nickname comes from the movie Inglourious Basterds, but it’s not the first nickname he had because of his faith.  In college, where he once fasted before a game against Purdue because of Yom Kippur, he was called the “Jewish Hammer.”

The Chicago Jewish community is fired up with Carimi’s arrival in town.  He has been written about plenty by Jewish organizations and was featured in a kickoff parade of the Great Jewish Family Festival on Sunday.  The locals think he’ll be the best Jewish player since Sid Luckman.   (O.J. Simpson? Not a Jew.)

“It shows that Jews are not just scrawny little people,” Dovid Weingrow, 11, told the Chicago Tribune. “Jews can go far [in sports].”

I’m proof that Jews can still be scrawny little people and not go far in sports.  (Although Florio would say I don’t count since I haven’t been to temple in my life.)

Carimi, on the other hand, embraces his faith.

“I find it extremely easy to balance my religion and my job,” Carimi said.

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 25, 2011, 01:26:27 pm
If the price was right...?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/25/torry-holt-wants-to-keep-playing/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 25, 2011, 02:32:28 pm
You really wonder if he has enough gas left in the tank. Might be a nice assistant coach
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 25, 2011, 03:18:48 pm
If the price was right...?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/25/torry-holt-wants-to-keep-playing/
You really wonder if he has enough gas left in the tank. Might be a nice assistant coach

 Wonder if he can take Wolfe's spot on ST's.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 25, 2011, 03:39:22 pm
You really wonder if he has enough gas left in the tank. Might be a nice assistant coach

Yeah...  I understand he could just as easily turn out to be another Orlando Pace situation.

But the reality is that our WRs have stalled on assimilating the Martz' offense, and we need some way (or someone) to help them step it up.  It may be that we need more talent at the position, or it may be the talent we have just needs a little more time.  Either way, at the end of last year, when it counted most, our air game wasn't working. Bringing in the WR who arguably had more success in Mad Mike's system than any other in history certainly couldn't hurt...  whether that be as an active on-field contributor or in more of a player-coach role. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on May 25, 2011, 03:43:59 pm
Just because he HAD success doesnt mean he still could.  That is the question. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 25, 2011, 03:49:49 pm
Yeah...  I understand he could just as easily turn out to be another Orlando Pace situation.

But the reality is that our WRs have stalled on assimilating the Martz' offense, and we need some way (or someone) to help them step it up.  It may be that we need more talent at the position, or it may be the talent we have just needs a little more time.  Either way, at the end of last year, when it counted most, our air game wasn't working. Bringing in the WR who arguably had more success in Mad Mike's system than any other in history certainly couldn't hurt...  whether that be as an active on-field contributor or in more of a player-coach role.

Yap you bring up some good points as an asst. WR coach.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 25, 2011, 04:20:10 pm
....but as player/coach he couldnt hurt. Could always be inactive. I think the Canadian may need adjusting the most because he hasnt played in the short field as a pro. Provided the price is right
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 25, 2011, 04:24:47 pm
Oh hell no to Torry Holt. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 25, 2011, 04:26:35 pm
Might just make your boy Martz look like a genius. Now you wouldnt want that would you?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on May 26, 2011, 05:11:08 am
I can't believe Holt has anything left.  While we are at it, Golden Richards is available again...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 26, 2011, 06:36:22 am
Griz is bad today.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 26, 2011, 10:38:10 am
From PFT, Best young players ready to start:

1. Caleb Hanie, QB, Chicago Bears
Doug Pensinger/Getty Images Come on, guys. Stop laughing, already.

Caleb Hanie's only been in the league since 2008, and sparingly gets time on the field, except if it's the NFC Championship, in which he gets to throw 20 times.

Seriously, though: Hanie's the definition of a steal. I hate to hype up a quarterback when he has had only one good game, but considering the circumstances, I'm not so sure you don't make a big deal out of his emergency performance when both Todd Collins and Jay Cutler (now you can laugh) went down in the NFC Championship game.

Let's look at the circumstances, and the response: First, Jay Cutler was struggling terribly against the Packers all game long, despite having a solid playoff run up to that point. Then, he gets hurt (um, "hurt") and Todd Collins comes in, and, within a couple of plays, is also hurt.

Enter Caleb Hanie, which signifies Cutler can no longer enter the game. Against the Green Bay Packers. In the game prior to the Super Bowl. While his team is down a pair of touchdowns against a defense that's been dominant at worst.

The response? Hanie came out scary-confident, and he was somehow able to turn jitters (they were there; look at the tape again) into two touchdown passes and constant evasion of the aggressive Green Bay defense.

He's a restricted free agent, and the Bears aren't in position to ask of the team who makes first offer, a draft pick.

Like I said, I hate to base the upside of any one player by a single game, but considering the circumstances, teams need to see it. Seriously.

Question to ponder: In the long run and with 20/20 hindsight, would the bears jave been better off to have not traded for Cutler and, instead, used the draft choices to stengthen other positons?

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 26, 2011, 10:43:23 am
Backup QB is always the most popular guy in town...

(unless his name is Todd Collins0
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on May 26, 2011, 11:06:30 am
I can't believe Holt has anything left.  While we are at it, Golden Richards is available again...

You sure he isn't dead?   ;D

What's Lance Alworth doing??
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 26, 2011, 11:20:52 am
Not to disparage Hanie (who has gotten a raw deal from Martz), but I think a lot of people are forgetting that in that game where Hanie "rallied" the Bears against the Packers, Charles Woodson was on the sideline the 2nd half.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on May 26, 2011, 01:51:08 pm

How many reps did you think Hanie got with the first team going into the NFCC game? 

Factor that in with that the Packers were up by 2 TDs and did not even have to play the run and Hanie's performance was quite impressive.  Even with the the pick to Raji and ONE of the 3 Packer pro bowl DBs being out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 26, 2011, 03:14:20 pm
Not to disparage Hanie (who has gotten a raw deal from Martz), but I think a lot of people are forgetting that in that game where Hanie "rallied" the Bears against the Packers, Charles Woodson was on the sideline the 2nd half.

And?  Woodson isn't the entire Packer defense.  Give Hanie his credit.  He did a hell of a job coming into the biggest game of his life.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 26, 2011, 04:39:44 pm
And?  Woodson isn't the entire Packer defense.  Give Hanie his credit.  He did a hell of a job coming into the biggest game of his life.

No argument there. As I think we can all agree, we'd have been a lot better off leaving Todd Collins in retirement and going with Hanie as our #2 from the get-go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 26, 2011, 06:55:40 pm
Hanie did a good job and I would testify to my belief of that.  There were a couple of other factors to consider, though.  Starting CB Sam Shields also missed part of the second half and, psychologically, the Packers' motivation sagged when the Bears went to their third string QB.  The lack of sharpness was apparent on a couple of plays. 

Bottom line: I think Haney may eventually be a better QB than Cutler.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 26, 2011, 11:11:28 pm
Hanie did a good job and I would testify to my belief of that.  There were a couple of other factors to consider, though.  Starting CB Sam Shields also missed part of the second half and, psychologically, the Packers' motivation sagged when the Bears went to their third string QB.  The lack of sharpness was apparent on a couple of plays. 

Bottom line: I think Haney may eventually be a better QB than Cutler.

I loved Mr. Haney.  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on May 27, 2011, 09:18:22 am
Mr. Haney from Green Acres:  LOL.  He almost always succeeded in unloading junk on Oliver Douglass at inflated prices despite his past shady dealings with them. He often took a piece of junk and called it by some outlandish name, suggesting that it has some use that it clearly does not and that it's in some way valuable.

Hmmm....sounds like Jerry Angelo to me!!   ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 27, 2011, 09:51:17 am
Mr. Haney from Green Acres:  LOL.  He almost always succeeded in unloading junk on Oliver Douglass at inflated prices despite his past shady dealings with them. He often took a piece of junk and called it by some outlandish name, suggesting that it has some use that it clearly does not and that it's in some way valuable.

Hmmm....sounds like Jerry Angelo to me!!   ;D

Your memory is sharp
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 27, 2011, 09:58:12 am
Mr. Haney from Green Acres:  LOL.  He almost always succeeded in unloading junk on Oliver Douglass at inflated prices despite his past shady dealings with them. He often took a piece of junk and called it by some outlandish name, suggesting that it has some use that it clearly does not and that it's in some way valuable.

Hmmm....sounds like Jerry Angelo to me!!   ;D

That's a great analogy... except that Angelo is usually receiving the junk at inflated prices, not unloading it. The rest of it though is spot-on. Well played! 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 27, 2011, 09:59:25 am
Speaking of Mr. Haney brings back fond memories of that lovable scoundel.  That was a good show.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 27, 2011, 10:58:54 am
Speaking of Mr. Haney brings back fond memories of that lovable scoundel.  That was a good show.

It was a good show
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on May 27, 2011, 01:12:43 pm
When I was in college there was a popular local band called Mr. Haney.

Always thought that was a great name for a band.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on May 28, 2011, 09:20:07 am
I played guitar in a jam band called "Mr. Spacely" (George Jetson's boss.)

Loved that name.

Green Acres as awesome, it didn't worry about being relevant, or cool, it was just funny!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 28, 2011, 10:09:27 am
Arnold was better than some of today's comedy characters.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on May 28, 2011, 06:04:39 pm
what is bad is we can still watch most of those shows on cable and we don't. Most people want to watch something with more sex, violence and swearing.

I do find myself watching the Waltons or Andy Griffith a good bit, or little house on the prarie.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on May 28, 2011, 08:52:49 pm
I like the old westerns. I loved Gunsmoke and Bonanza and Rawhide.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 29, 2011, 01:14:01 am

 Adam Sandler is totally beyond me...in the catagory of Pauly Shore and Rosie O'Donnell.

 I guess theres funny there...but...

 However Norm McDonald is great!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 29, 2011, 03:49:45 pm
Many old TV shows are still great to watch - except old comedy shows - not so much.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 29, 2011, 06:34:59 pm
Seriously you didn't find "Happy Gilmore" or "The Water Boy" funny?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 29, 2011, 06:44:46 pm
I was referring to the Jack Benny, Red Skelton and others of that era.  At the time I thought they were hilarious but now I don't.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 29, 2011, 06:55:13 pm
I was talking about JJ and Adam Sandler.  Who I find to be pretty damn funny.  Not in every single one of his movies but he has a few that are just damn funny.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on May 30, 2011, 10:04:17 am
One scene in Happy Gilmore was funny(the Bob Barker fight)...the rest of his movies...not so much.  And I don't get Will Farrell at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 30, 2011, 10:10:56 am
IMHO the most talented actor, in any sort of situatiom, is Carroll O'Connor.  He can, single-handedly carry a show, whether serious or comedy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on May 30, 2011, 03:48:59 pm
Comedy is subjective.  Some of the new stuff I find hysterical and some is just some sick $hit.  Others may look at it exactly the opposite. 

I liked Adam Sandler, but his movies used to be cutting edge and now they are fairly predictable.  Same with Will Ferrell, Mike Myers, and so on.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on May 30, 2011, 05:04:56 pm
Chicago Bears to do list

Joshua Lobdell.com


While it looks like the Chicago Bears did a pretty decent job in the 2011 NFL draft, and used a first round pick for the first time in what feels like forever, the Bears could still use a couple of things. They still need a big play receiver, more help along the offensive line, and depending on who we talk to a better option at backup QB. They did of course draft Idaho QB Nathan Enderle, but I would like to see a veteran backing up Jay Cutler, who I do not put a lot of faith in to begin with.

On paper this team looks pretty good, and they made a somewhat surprising run to the NFC championship last season. However, they do not have the receivers that fit Offensive Coordinator Mike Martz’s system. Sure Johnny Knox and Devin Hester have big play ability but they perform poorly against press coverage. This team still needs a wide out that can open up the field for Cutler.

Despite using the 29th overall pick on OT Gabe Carimi I still see a lot of holes in the Bears offensive line. Olin Kreutz will be 34 and may leave in free agency. The best bet to replace him would be Roberto Garza but he is inexperienced. Edwin Williams is also a possibility but he did not play well at Guard last year. This team could one, if not two, interior O linemen once free agency starts.

On top of that I see holes in the Bears LB corps. When the season ended they only had three under contract for 2011 and even with the addition of JT Thomas via the draft depth is a big concern here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 30, 2011, 07:22:13 pm
I was talking about JJ and Adam Sandler.  Who I find to be pretty damn funny.  Not in every single one of his movies but he has a few that are just damn funny.

 I just dont get the Adam Sandler humor Duck.

 I may have dropped a gene pool here or there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 30, 2011, 09:14:03 pm
BearFan has it correct they each have some great movies then a lot that suck for the most part but a few funny parts.  Also the SNL formula movies get a bit old after awhile. 

For me every one should see "Happy Gilmore", "Talladega Nights",  and "Tommy Boy".  If you don't like any of them you have no sense of humor or you have a very different sense of humor then me.

Then there is always, "Spinal Tap" (not for everyone but if you ever played in a rock band you will get a lot of the jokes), Monty Python And The Holy Grail" (maybe the best stupid movie ever), and even "Wayne's World" (warning not for everyone the older crowd will certainly not get it at all) which was surprisingly a very funny movie for being based off of a SNL skit.

   

   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 30, 2011, 09:39:42 pm

 Spinal Tap

 Waynes World

 Monty Python

 I got it! I got the fuuckin humor...

 Adam Sandler after SNL...Pauly Shore...Rosie O'Donnell...

 this shiit just escaped me.

 Biodome and Juryduty were funny?

 Herpes is funny.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on May 30, 2011, 10:28:35 pm
Pauly shore is not someone I would say is funny.

Adam Sandler is funny as is Will Ferrell.  Rosie O'Donell is a fat ugly cow who is most definately not funny.



 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 30, 2011, 11:27:48 pm
Pauly shore is not someone I would say is funny.

Adam Sandler is funny as is Will Ferrell.  Rosie O'Donell is a fat ugly cow who is most definately not funny.

 Will Ferrell is funny.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 30, 2011, 11:38:32 pm

 Best version I could find of MORE COWBELL !

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKV3iCOlOMw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKV3iCOlOMw)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on May 30, 2011, 11:45:15 pm

 I GOTTA FEVER...THE ONLY PRESCRIPTION IS...MORE COWBELL!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on May 31, 2011, 07:06:33 am
I like Sandler. Will Ferrell is just stupid to me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on May 31, 2011, 07:48:40 am
I enjoyed most everything Eddie Murphy has been involved with - even as the DONKEY voice in Shrek...

Impressive how young he was when he burst on to the scene from SNL
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on May 31, 2011, 10:51:06 am
Don't throw rocks at me but the funniest single performance  that I have I have ever watched is Victor Borge and his piano recital.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on June 01, 2011, 10:03:49 am
The NFL channel has a vote by NFL players on the best 100 players for 2011.


They told early on there are 4 Bears on the list.

The only one in the bottom  60 was Briggs.

Supposedly the other three will be Cutler, Peppers and Urlacher.

All three in the top 60 is quite a statement from the other players.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on June 01, 2011, 10:12:33 am
That vote has no credibility after seeing 14 WRs rated ahead of Jennings.  Apparently the players are no better judges than fans and less so than NFL commentators.

I never read the ratings but decided to follow this poll because it involved voting by the players.  Unfortunately, I don't think that it means much either.  With no football activity at all things are really slow.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on June 01, 2011, 12:44:15 pm
c'mon- The Dick Van Dyke show had its moments. People STILL watch the Lucille Ball show (btw google her pics when she was a hoofer, ab so lute ly drop dead gorgeous). Was credited with setting up the shot angles and sets that are still used.  Milton Berle, Ernie Kovacks, remember, censorship was tighter, had to read between the lines more. Bob Hope's deadpan stare at the camera, if you were of age you got it, if you weren't you didn't. Again, different world.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 01, 2011, 02:33:16 pm
Don't throw rocks at me but the funniest single performance  that I have I have ever watched is Victor Borge and his piano recital.

 Packy I heard that stuff on the radio years later...FUNNY!
 There was a dude that used to do piano and political comments while singing...
dont know who he was.
 Used to catch that on radio years later.

c'mon- The Dick Van Dyke show had its moments. People STILL watch the Lucille Ball show (btw google her pics when she was a hoofer, ab so lute ly drop dead gorgeous). Was credited with setting up the shot angles and sets that are still used.  Milton Berle, Ernie Kovacks, remember, censorship was tighter, had to read between the lines more. Bob Hope's deadpan stare at the camera, if you were of age you got it, if you weren't you didn't. Again, different world.

It wasnt Lucy but Ricky who invented the 3 angle camera shot for television.

 He just took from the movies and applied it to TV.

 It was a first because back then if you went from movies to TV (the enemy) you were blackballed in Hollywood.

 Lucy and Red Skelton just had their contracts cut from the movie studios...

 they met with BUSTER KEATON who told them you are clowns...

 not in the insult...but the physical humor...

 and maybe they should check out the new thing called television.

 Another thing that Ricky did was FILM the episode...

 and get it to all the timezones so it went on at the same time nationwide.

 The result was "I Love Lucy."

 Before that television was pretty much live.

 Ernie Kovacks was making marijuana jokes that only his writers and the "beats" got...

 but it went out to a national audience.

 And right over their heads. Nyuk!



Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 01, 2011, 02:40:51 pm
 
Quote
Ernie Kovacks was making **** jokes  that only his writers and the "beats" got...

 but it went out to a national audience.

 And right over their heads. Nyuk!

 What did you think I typed there in red that had to be censored?

 Hint : You smoke it and its not tobacco.

 its a learning process...but it breaks up the thought process.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 01, 2011, 02:44:47 pm

 At some point we have to make a list of words that this board rejects.

 So we dont type them or know how to get around typing them.

 The word?

 M-a-r-j-o-j-a-u-n-a
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 01, 2011, 05:52:03 pm
Can Mike Tice Help Pave the Way for More Success on the Bears' Offense?

Bryan Dietzler (Bears Featured Columnist)

June 1, 2011


The Chicago Bears took on a brand new offensive scheme last season when they hired offensive coordinator Mike Martz to help a consistently stagnant offense gain some steam.  The team hoped that Martz could mold quarterback Jay Cutler into an all-star and bring along their wide receivers to the point that their unit could be competitive.

But the one glaring issue that concerned Bears fans the most entering the previous season was the team's offensive line. The team had done virtually nothing to improve the line since 2008 when they took offensive tackle (and now guard) Chris Williams—a pick that just has not panned out for them the way they planned.

They also picked up J’Marcus Webb, and although he has played well, he did not play well enough to keep quarterback Jay Cutler safe enough last season. Just like the rest of the offensive line.

Things could have been much worse had the Bears not had someone like assistant coach Mike Tice to understand the dynamics of the offensive line. Tice has a lot of experience working with offenses and offensive lines and his knowledge was definitely vital to the Bears throughout their problems on the offensive line last season.

The Bears gave Tice a new weapon in the draft this year when they took Wisconsin offensive tackle Gabe Carimi in the first round.  Guidance from Tice will certainly prepare Carimi for his career with the Bears.  Also, Tice may help create the right combination for the Bear’s offensive line and turn it into what we hope will be a solid unit.

Despite its injuries and ineffectiveness throughout much of last season, the offensive line functioned thanks to Tice.  For example, he lobbied for the Bears to run the ball more, thus allowing his offensive line to develop greater cohesion and feel much more comfortable playing together.

This kind of experience will put the Bears' offense and offensive line in much better shape in the coming season. Things should also be better for the Bears due to Tice's experience and the addition of Carimi.  Hopefully Tice is able to work his magic and prepare the offensive line for an important season.

So yes, thanks to his experience, Tice can indeed help this team find greater success next season on offense. The Bears will certainly need that experience if they are going to have success next season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on June 01, 2011, 06:23:54 pm
Buddy Hackett...

'Nuff said.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 01, 2011, 08:09:07 pm
Funniest stand up was Richard Pryor, Geroge Carlin, Eddie Murphy (Raw).

After them believe it or not Andrew Dice Clay had an HBO special that was funnier then ****.  Everyone in the room watching it was crying from laughter.  Sam Kinneson also very funny.

But I thought we were talking comedians in movies. 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 01, 2011, 08:56:50 pm
Funniest stand up was Richard Pryor, Geroge Carlin, Eddie Murphy (Raw).

After them believe it or not Andrew Dice Clay had an HBO special that was funnier then ****.  Everyone in the room watching it was crying from laughter.  Sam Kinneson also very funny.

But I thought we were talking comedians in movies.

 Duck,

 I remember this line from Dice Clay: About "I Dream Of Jeanie" ...

 "The guy keeps pushing this biitch away...I would be like : Hey Jeanie, make your tongue six feet long and lick my BALLS from across the room." Ow!

 Fuucking fell on the floor! LMAO!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 01, 2011, 09:04:38 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0q4o58pKwA
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 01, 2011, 09:12:06 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWzI_Wn0ZwM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWzI_Wn0ZwM)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 01, 2011, 09:18:42 pm
Great Sam Kinison clip JJ!  "You know what this sand.  You know what it's going to be in 100 years?  SAND!!!"  Good stuff.

JJ, That was the one I was talking about.  I think it was called, "The Diceman Cometh" or soemthing like that.  I think it was shown on New Years Eve the first time and I was at my future mother in laws with my future wife.  Both me, my wife and the inlaws were in tears it was so damn funny.  Totally rude and crude but belly laughing funny.



Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 01, 2011, 09:29:33 pm
JJ post the diceman one on "hogging".  "I got twinkies, I got Ho,ho's..."  He likes to **** fat chicks cause they try harder.  LOL!

The one you posted was an earlier one and he was stumbling a lot at the beginning.  The HBO one he had the routine nailed.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: JeffH on June 01, 2011, 11:00:59 pm
There was a dude that used to do piano and political comments while singing...
dont know who he was.

Tom Lehrer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Lehrer
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 02, 2011, 12:34:56 am
Tom Lehrer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Lehrer

 That looks like the guy...thanx JeffH!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on June 02, 2011, 08:19:00 am
Those were great, thanks Jackie.  I was thinking about the SK routine the other day "Why doesn't the cameraman give him a sandwich"

LMFAO
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on June 02, 2011, 09:40:16 am
JJ- My sources said it was lucy. Ricky was way to busy chasing and catching every skirt that came his way. Pryor was and still is Hysterical with his skits. They all had a bite to them, and made you remember. Grew up in Peoria btw.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on June 02, 2011, 11:34:37 am
The conversation has drifted to the modern comedians.  I get very uncomfortable with their language and subject matter.  I'll take Bob Hope and Jack Benny style.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on June 02, 2011, 11:45:04 am
Collinsworth to Coach son's HS Football team...read his interesting comment about NFL season ... “But what the heck, the NFL will probably miss at least half of their season anyway..." 

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/31/collinsworth-preps-for-lockout-by-taking-high-school-coaching-job/related/ (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/31/collinsworth-preps-for-lockout-by-taking-high-school-coaching-job/related/)

If that happens it will SU(K!!!   >:(
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 02, 2011, 11:50:07 am
Actually the NFL and the NFLPA met with out the lawyers Tuesday night, yesterday and today.  So at least they are finally negotiating again.

Oh and yes Richard Pryor was from Peoria but so was Sam Kinison.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on June 02, 2011, 11:56:19 am
That's a good sign!  ;D

I love a good comic.  Saw a guy at The Improv last month that had my wife and I in tears from laughing so hard.  Darned if I can remember his name, though..having a pre-Senior brain fart.

Sam Kinison, Eddie Murphy, The Diceman, Robin Williams, Steve Martin, Richard Pryor, Chris Rock all make me laugh that way. 

After awhile, Dice can wear you out with the vulgarity. 

He sure dropped off the radar though....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on June 02, 2011, 11:57:47 am
Cool, "fart" isn't censored!  Yet!  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on June 02, 2011, 12:29:48 pm
Steven Wright ...I prefer a comic that doesn't scream at me
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 02, 2011, 02:58:58 pm
Bears' Martz thinking big with Bennett

Brad Biggs/Tribune reporter


It’s not surprising that Mike Martz is plotting a bigger role for Earl Bennett.

The Chicago Bears offensive coordinator has to find something to do with his time during the NFL’s lockout, and reviewing 2010 while looking ahead to the coming season is a big part of it. Martz announced in a story on the Bears' team-controlled website that Bennett will be more involved in the offense moving forward.

Martz didn’t get much of a look at Bennett, a third-round pick from 2008, until last season started. Bennett had arthroscopic knee surgery that sidelined him for the majority of the offseason program and then a hamstring injury wiped out much of his summer.

When the sure-handed target got on the field, he produced. Bennett finished second among wide receivers with 46 receptions for 561 yards. That’s five less catches than Johnny Knox made, but consider Knox was on the field for 371 more offensive snaps.

“We didn’t throw it to him enough,” Martz said on the website. “That will be remedied. He will figure in a much larger role than he did last year. He came to us late. He was injured. I wasn’t really sure where he was with all the stuff. But he established himself as a guy who needs to get a lot more balls than he did.

“He’s extremely reliable. I know Jay (Cutler) feels comfortable with him in the slot doing some of those things. But he should be able to play outside for us as well.”

The Bears need more production from their wideouts, period. In the 10 previous offenses directed by Martz, the No. 1 wide receiver averaged 88.7 receptions for 1,256 yards. Combine Knox and Bennett and you get 97 receptions for 1,521 yards. You get the picture. What plans the team has for the position in free agency remain unknown. Heck, the NFL hasn’t disclosed the parameters for free agency so no one is certain what the pool of players will look like at this point.

There stands a good chance the biggest contributions will have to be made by those already on the team’s roster. That’s where carving out more playing time for Bennett comes into play. He started 15 games in 2009 and it could be that he’ll take playing time away from Devin Hester in 2011. Hester was on the field for 66 percent of the offensive snaps last season. Bennett was in on 49.3 percent of the action.

Martz referenced having Bennett play inside and outside and that’s something that has been missing --  a player with the skill set to handle both roles. That’s what many of the true No. 1 receivers in the NFL can do. Whether or not Bennett is cut out for a star role remains to be seen, but certainly he’s capable of bigger and better things than he was allowed to display this past season.

He had one 100-yard game like Knox. Bennett also had two touchdowns in the Nov. 28 victory over the Philadelphia Eagles. They complement each other well, so it won’t be surprising if they’re the starters moving forward. There would still be plenty of opportunities to involve Hester, and the Bears need to be mindful of ways to get him the ball in the open field and keep him involved with the change in rules likely to make it more challenging for special teams returns, at least on kickoffs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 02, 2011, 06:34:44 pm
I like Wright as well.  The Diceman was a one trick pony.  He had the one show that was funny as hell but couldn't follow up on it.  It is hard to stay on the edge as a comic doing that kind of humor. 

Why do you think Eddie Murphy had crap movie after crap movie until he finally gave in and went to Disney to make mediocre movies.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on June 02, 2011, 08:53:44 pm
Steven Wright:  "I put spot remover on my dog.....and he disappeared"

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 02, 2011, 09:15:00 pm
Emo Phillips, "My mom always told me anytime you ride the bus there is always one wierdo on it.  I have never seen him..."

Or something like that.  I only seen it once and it **** me up.

He is full of them:

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/e/emo_philips.html
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on June 03, 2011, 07:22:29 am
I listen to XM comedy on my way to work - young and old - great stuff...

RawDog is uncensored - for us younger kids - LaughUSA is milder for Packer backers
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on June 03, 2011, 10:05:32 am
Steven Wright ...I prefer a comic that doesn't scream at me

Agreed.  Too often in comedy, as in music, volume is used to compensate for lack of talent and/or creativity.

Smart and subtle works for me every time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on June 03, 2011, 10:06:12 am
BH - My son is addicted to those old comedy shows on XM, too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 03, 2011, 01:16:03 pm
Lighten up, age is just a number

Tillman takes exception to words as he ignores Father Time


http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0603-pompei-tillman-bears-chic20110602,0,5139105.column


Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 03, 2011, 09:33:56 pm
JJ- My sources said it was lucy. Ricky was way to busy chasing and catching every skirt that came his way. Pryor was and still is Hysterical with his skits. They all had a bite to them, and made you remember. Grew up in Peoria btw.

 Nope...it was Ricky. Pryor is in a class by himself...first man to set himself on fire using crack.

 And he told you about it before it was called crack.

 
The conversation has drifted to the modern comedians.  I get very uncomfortable with their language and subject matter.  I'll take Bob Hope and Jack Benny style.

 Trust me Packy if Hope and Benny could have gotten away with it...they would have!
 
 Heres the tweener : Lenny Bruce

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSfk6nKSCcI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSfk6nKSCcI)

 

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 03, 2011, 09:56:54 pm
That's a good sign!  ;D

I love a good comic.  Saw a guy at The Improv last month that had my wife and I in tears from laughing so hard.  Darned if I can remember his name, though..having a pre-Senior brain fart.

Sam Kinison, Eddie Murphy, The Diceman, Robin Williams, Steve Martin, Richard Pryor, Chris Rock all make me laugh that way. 

After awhile, Dice can wear you out with the vulgarity. 

He sure dropped off the radar though....

 DIce was as stated a one trick pony...but it was funny as hell!

 
Steven Wright ...I prefer a comic that doesn't scream at me

 I like to go ice skating...on the other side of the ice.

 Hey does anybody remember "The Far Side" comic strip?

 Hey Packy if you want to post cartoons...post those!

 Anybody remember the "Bloom County" comic strip?

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFHNR9y3Rwk&feature=fvsr (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFHNR9y3Rwk&feature=fvsr)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 03, 2011, 10:19:58 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VmtNntThPo (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VmtNntThPo)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on June 04, 2011, 12:06:32 pm
That Clay video was funnier than hell!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 05, 2011, 09:02:49 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/05/dungy-visiting-chicago-bears-staff-getting-an-education/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 06, 2011, 10:14:45 pm
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/05/dungy-visiting-chicago-bears-staff-getting-an-education/

 Hmmmm...we already have 4 HEAD COACHES...but I could see making room for Dungy!

 Whats Dungy's history? I know he played but what position?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on June 06, 2011, 10:15:35 pm
He was a DB
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 06, 2011, 11:02:25 pm
He was a DB

 Jon Hoke is our DB coach...anybody see an upgrade if we brought Dungy aboard?

 That is if he wanted to... ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on June 08, 2011, 08:59:39 am
I've never been sold on Hoke. His development of our CBs has been marginal at best and his work with our safeties has been terrible. Last year was the first season in years that our safety play didn't flat-out su-ck.  That's been a huge issue for this team and even more so given that Lovie's defensive scheme demands strong DB play.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on June 08, 2011, 10:41:46 am
NFL Network last night did a small thing on Paea. Him and "Big" Toe are working out together.  Toena was a nice spot player last year, and Paea is one strong Mfer.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on June 08, 2011, 01:24:11 pm
Hopefully Paea is the steal of the draft for us, but really I hope Carimi is the steal, because we desperately need an upgrade at OT more than DT. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 08, 2011, 02:38:36 pm
Hopefully Paea is the steal of the draft for us, but really I hope Carimi is the steal, because we desperately need an upgrade at OT more than DT. 

I expect him to make an immediate impact.  I watched him play at Wisconsin and loved his play at LT.  He's what we need.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on June 08, 2011, 02:53:37 pm
If he could generate some push up the middle, then Peppers and Izzy suddenly become a lot more formidable, which would take some pressure off the DB's.  FCOL, Nathan Vasher looked good when the Bears had a pass rush...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 08, 2011, 06:10:06 pm
If he could generate some push up the middle, then Peppers and Izzy suddenly become a lot more formidable, which would take some pressure off the DB's.  FCOL, Nathan Vasher looked good when the Bears had a pass rush...

 True dat about Vasher. I'm wondering what the hell Tice is up to...he keeps stockpiling gorillas.

 The guys brought in under Tice's watch are monsters. Both drafted and FA.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on June 09, 2011, 07:08:09 am
I guess he figures if they can't block at least there is more of them to get in the way.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 11, 2011, 05:13:58 pm
I guess he figures if they can't block at least there is more of them to get in the way.

 Seems that way. I'd like to see what Tice does with that package he's assembled.

 Those are some big motherfuuckers...BUT...do they have talent?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on June 12, 2011, 01:43:05 pm
we've been asking for big nasties up front. They are getting big, let's hope they are nasty blockers too!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 12, 2011, 08:25:46 pm

 What Tice has done since he's been here is :

 Carimi

 H. Johnson

 Webb?

 E. Williams?

 Thats 2 out of 4 that can be traced to Tice.

 And lets remember how we came out of the bye last season.

 That was all Tice. I'm not on this guys bandwagon by a longshot.

 Give me an upcoming season to see what he has built.

 But it looks good if there is any talent to be involved there.

 Tice could be on to somthing...it is the biggest line ever made...  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on June 13, 2011, 06:08:42 am
Thats wonderful Jackie but lets not put the praises too high just yet. Carimi is a rookie. Webb still has a lot to prove yet and Big Herman was let go by the Rams. He hasnt even suited up for us yet either. Yeah, things look promising on paper but I am not too excited yet. Championships arent won on paper.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on June 13, 2011, 11:14:03 am
The Bears players seem a bit chippy (or is it chirpy ?  :)) this off-season. Now Lance Briggs steps up to the plate and says they are a championship caliber team.

I'm glad to see the confidence, but usually with the Bears history this usually turns out to be hubris (1985 season exempted). I hope the "Pieces are in Place" and they can back up their talk in the offseason.

The reality as of now is that the Packers have another SB trophy and the Bears have exactly ONE.  Time to put up or shut up indeed.....

Player strike or not, Lovie's legacy is dependent on this season.....

(BTW being at "newbie" again after all the time on the other board feels strange :D)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on June 13, 2011, 12:50:59 pm
Yeah the Bears seem to play best when they are playing the disrespect card.  I dont think the boasting we are the best card is going to work out so well. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 13, 2011, 04:37:23 pm
Good grief.  Players showing confidence in their team is a good thing and seeing some of you complain about is unreal.  What do you want them to do, say they stink?

That wouldn't make you guys happy either I'm sure.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on June 14, 2011, 10:40:30 am
Complain ? No. I like it, but the reality is that this team tends to crap its pants when the time to get to (or play in) the big dance, 85 notwithstanding.

Besides, its the offseason. Not much news (especially since the strike). We've gotta have something to complain about other than a wretched economy and a liar/nincompoop/evil genius (take your choice) as POTUS....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on June 14, 2011, 11:13:08 am
Keep that fuc-king, godd-amn, depressing political bullsh-it outta here!!!  :D

Why Cutler Was Better than Forte on Third Downs (http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/grizzly-detail/Bizarro-Bears-Cutler-and-Forte-on-Third-Downs-123764764.html)

Ready for a bizarre assessment of the Bears 2010 season? Jay Cutler was a much better back than Matt Forte in third-down situations.  Jay Cutler was the best rushing quarterback in the league in third-down situations in 2010 (http://www.footballoutsiders.com/extra-points/2011/higher-education-best-and-worst-third-down-backs). Laugh if you'd like, but it's true. Cutler rushed for 121 yards in 12 carries on third-down and was successful 75 percent of the time. Seriously, stop laughing. Cutler is surprisingly mobile, and when plays would break down a large defensive lineman was bearing down, Cutler could still pull a first-down out.

Kool-aid warning....

Andy Fantuz impressing Bears (http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/news/story?id=6658257&campaign=rss&source=NFLHeadlines)

With so much attention given to which veteran wide receiver the Chicago Bears should target once the NFL lockout ends and free agency begins, one new receiver already under contract is working to establish a rapport with his new teammates.  Former CFL standout Andy Fantuz, who signed a reserve/futures contract with the Bears on Feb. 4, 2011, participated last week in the Bears unofficial offseason workouts led by quarterback Jay Cutler, according to an NFL source.  Fantuz, who caught 276 passes for 4,136 yards and 23 touchdowns the last five seasons with the Saskatchewan Roughriders, drew considerable praise from a few players in attendance at the workouts. Granted, Cutler and fellow quarterback Caleb Hanie are throwing passes without any defenders present, but Fantuz was said to display impressive athletic ability and good hands while running routes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 14, 2011, 04:56:31 pm
Complain ? No. I like it, but the reality is that this team tends to crap its pants when the time to get to (or play in) the big dance, 85 notwithstanding.

But they only went to the big dance once since the 85 season.  So being down on a player for showing confidence in probably the best team the city has had in a long time  this season just doesn't make sense to me I guess.

With bad coaching  hires (Jauron, Wanstedt), QB issues, and injuries during that span set the team back in so many ways.  I see things looking up for the Bears this season.

Quote
Besides, its the offseason. Not much news (especially since the strike).

The reason for the lack of news of course is the labor dispute.  We can only hope for the best.  I suggest you start getting into baseball for now until then.  So complaining about Urly and Briggs being confident about this upcoming season should make you feel good instead of complaining.

Quote
We've gotta have something to complain about other than a wretched economy and a liar/nincompoop/evil genius (take your choice) as POTUS....

What does George Bush have to do with this topic?  Sheeesh!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 14, 2011, 05:49:28 pm

 The Tice Line...I dont know what the fuuck is going on there...

 but if Tice can build that O-Line he's obviously building...

 this could lead to some serious shiiit.

 Protection for Cutler {at last}...

 blocking lanes for RB's?

 Waaaaait a mintute here...

 what do you mean DAA BEARRSSE can be a team that takes it all?

 Lets just back up a minute and feel sorry for ourselves...OR...

 LETS KICK SOME GODDAMMMN MOTHER FUUUUUCKING ASSS!!!

 WE owe G.B.,...why?

 Not because they won over us when it counted...

 because they punked our QB.

 You get one chance to do that...now its our turn to do that to them.

 Or they are better then we are.

 Thats never going to happen in the history of DAA BEARRSSE.

 It's not.

 This isnt business...it's personal.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on June 15, 2011, 08:35:56 am
Nice to see that article on Fantuz yesterday, and here's some good news on Cutler as well:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/15/teammates-say-cutler-looks-great/

Re Paea...  he's smallish, but bull strong.  With him and Toeiana paired up we've at least got a pair of DTs that we know will give 110% every down -- which hasn't been the case on the interior DL for quite awhile.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 16, 2011, 03:45:20 am
Nice to see that article on Fantuz yesterday, and here's some good news on Cutler as well:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/15/teammates-say-cutler-looks-great/

Re Paea...  he's smallish, but bull strong.  With him and Toeiana paired up we've at least got a pair of DTs that we know will give 110% every down -- which hasn't been the case on the interior DL for quite awhile.

 Yeah if theres ever an NFL again...there will be,the moneys too big.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on June 16, 2011, 07:13:58 am
Jackie,

Nice to see you have found your way around the bad-word filters.

:  )
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 16, 2011, 03:40:26 pm
Jackie,

Nice to see you have found your way around the bad-word filters.

:  )

 Define "bad word" Stelz you irrepressible zany you!

 Bad words are a state of mind...not reality.

 Words are words.

 I still say that TICE is building an OFFENSIVE LINE with what could be termed "losers"

 by any other teams standards.

 Except...these guys havent played for Tice...yet.

 Anybody remember Cedric Bensen?  Bust = Chicago ... Hero = Cinncy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 16, 2011, 03:43:09 pm
Source: Andy Fantuz impressing Bears

Jeff Dickerson/ESPNChicago.com


CHICAGO -- With so much attention given to which veteran wide receiver the Chicago Bears should target once the NFL lockout ends and free agency begins, one new receiver already under contract is working to establish a rapport with his new teammates.

Former CFL standout Andy Fantuz, who signed a reserve/futures contract with the Bears on Feb. 4, 2011, participated last week in the Bears unofficial offseason workouts led by quarterback Jay Cutler, according to an NFL source.

Fantuz, who caught 276 passes for 4,136 yards and 23 touchdowns the last five seasons with the Saskatchewan Roughriders, drew considerable praise from a few players in attendance at the workouts. Granted, Cutler and fellow quarterback Caleb Hanie are throwing passes without any defenders present, but Fantuz was said to display impressive athletic ability and good hands while running routes.

The 6-foot-4, 220-pound Fantuz hauled in 87 passes for 1,380 yards and six touchdowns in 2010.

With the departure of Devin Aromashodu, who failed to receive a restricted free agent tender from the Bears, and the unrestricted free agent status of veteran Rashied Davis, the team will likely have an opening for at least one new wideout to challenge for playing time in 2011. While the Bears certainly won't rule out using free agency to further address that need, Fantuz should be given a legitimate opportunity to win a roster spot when/if training camp opens next month.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 16, 2011, 03:47:01 pm
Could Santana Moss Be a Good Fit?


When the lockout ends, the Bears will have to squeeze months worth of free agency work into weeks, as they have to sign 26 players just to get up to training camp numbers. According to the Chicago Tribune's Brad Biggs, a deal between the owners and players in the coming weeks could mean an insane July for Bears staff:

Consider right now the Bears have only two-thirds of the players they will take to training camp on their 80-man roster. Yes, that includes the draft picks from April that are not under contract. It also includes the players like wide receiver Andy Fantuz and punter Richmond McGee, who signed reserve/futures contracts that are binding but do not take effect until the first day of the new league year.

Wide receiver is the position that the Bears are expected to address in free agency. Plaxico Burress, Mike Sims-Walker, Terrell Owens and even Randy Moss have been discussed as possible Bears, but there is a free agent receiver who would logically fit in with the Bears and Mike Martz's offensive scheme: veteran Redskin wideout Santana Moss.

As Washington's top receiver, Moss had 1,115 yards over 93 catches in 2010. He's 12th among active receivers in yardage, and his height and speed fit in well with Martz's favorite types of receiver. In his career playing for the Jets and Redskins, he's had four different head coaches, meaning four different schemes. Learning Martz's won't be as difficult for him as it would be for a young, untested wideout. He has even contributed on kick and punt returns, and if the Bears don't re-sign Danieal Manning, Devin Hester could use the help.

But it's not all rosy, as Moss doesn't want to leave Washington. That means he'll command a high price, and last season, the Bears have committed a boatload of cash to Julius Peppers and (sigh) Chester Taylor.

When free agency does start, the Bears will have to move quickly, but it makes sense for the team to spend the shortened off-season going after Moss.

Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/grizzly-detail/Could-Santana-Moss-Be-a-Good-Fit-123489734.html?utm_source=bleacherreport.com&utm_medium=referral#ixzz1PTSFS9Wy
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 16, 2011, 04:09:10 pm

 I wonder if Plaxx could fit in ?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on June 17, 2011, 05:59:25 am
No to Moss, yes to Sid Rice
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on June 17, 2011, 11:17:45 am
Green: Crown their ass:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYKIcnj1MJY&feature=player_embedded#at=29
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 17, 2011, 05:14:44 pm
No to Moss, yes to Sid Rice

 Wow when you start to add up veteren FA WR's the list is pretty big.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on June 18, 2011, 08:38:54 am
I am zany...

No offense at all, I'm just glad you are still you here.  My brain doesn't even register that you have placed four "k's" in "motherfukkkker"  A shame you have to add this extra effort, but it is worth it, to me anyway
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on June 18, 2011, 11:39:36 am
I'd give Plaxico a shot. I never thought what he did was that big of a deal. I look for Cutler to come back strong, we need to make sure he has an adequate line and some targets to throw the ball to.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on June 18, 2011, 11:51:17 am
If we can get better push up the middle on D, we could easily move into a top 5 D. D needs some work. O needs serious work..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 19, 2011, 12:16:13 am
I am zany...

No offense at all, I'm just glad you are still you here.  My brain doesn't even register that you have placed four "k's" in "motherfukkkker"  A shame you have to add this extra effort, but it is worth it, to me anyway

 It's the way the system works Stelz...we all deal with it in our own ways.

 
I'd give Plaxico a shot. I never thought what he did was that big of a deal. I look for Cutler to come back strong, we need to make sure he has an adequate line and some targets to throw the ball to.

 There looks like a knee deep situation at FA WR...Plaxx being one of them...and yeah what he did to himself was his own business.

 The word is Plaxx hasnt gone thru 2 seasons of NFL football...so in effect he's 2 seasons younger.

 OK...I could buy into that line of B.S. from his agent...shiiit....bring him into camp for a looksee.

 
If we can get better push up the middle on D, we could easily move into a top 5 D. D needs some work. O needs serious work..

 Hopefully Paea gives us that push...Paea has to be a direct response to Raji.

 If G.B. can push us around...we better push back.

 As far as the OFFENSE goes...why is TICE collecting the biggest O-Line in NFL hstory?

 I hope he knows what he's doing. BIG does not equate to TALENT.

 I'd like to see what he's doing playout on the field.  :)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on June 19, 2011, 05:52:05 pm
As far as the OFFENSE goes...why is TICE collecting the biggest O-Line in NFL hstory?

 I hope he knows what he's doing. BIG does not equate to TALENT.


I agree. There is a reason why big Herman didnt make it in St Louis. There is a reason Edwin Williams didnt make it in Washington. There is a reason why Webb lasted till the 7th round.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 19, 2011, 08:00:40 pm
Tice built one hell of an O-line in Minny while he was there.  They have gotten worse since he left.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 20, 2011, 12:52:30 am
As far as the OFFENSE goes...why is TICE collecting the biggest O-Line in NFL hstory?

 I hope he knows what he's doing. BIG does not equate to TALENT.


I agree. There is a reason why big Herman didnt make it in St Louis. There is a reason Edwin Williams didnt make it in Washington. There is a reason why Webb lasted till the 7th round.

 On the other hand Webb started...when I thot his ass was going to be cut in pre-season.

 Thats what made me start to back-up about what Tice is doing.

 Coming out of the bye week we went on a roll...the OL was one of THE main reasons for that.

 Tice got them to gel in only 2 weeks.

 So if Tice wants monsters from whatever source...I'm willing to give him the benifit of the doubt.

 He's proved what he can do with a ragtag mess... he seems to have gotten what he wants...

 I'm waiting to see what he has up his sleeve with what he now has.  :o

 
Tice built one hell of an O-line in Minny while he was there.  They have gotten worse since he left.

 Exactley. And we have gotten better...I'm not buying into anything until I see onfield play.

 That we could be even better.   ???   :P
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on June 20, 2011, 11:19:18 am
No way to Plaxico.

Notwithstanding his legal past, he is a lazy fuk who has coasted on his size for most of his career and is notorious for missing or being chronically late to team activities.

The whole gun incident was representative of his overall lack of discipline, bad judgment and entitlement mentality that are just part of his character.   

Plus he's like 34 or something by now.  Some desperate team will overpay him and put up with his bulls-hit but it shouldn't be us.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 20, 2011, 12:06:05 pm
I say give him a shot (no pun intended).  A one year deal and that'll be the tall target that folks here crave.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on June 20, 2011, 02:39:54 pm
Could this be that FA O-Lineman the Bears are supposedly going to add yet?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/20/doubt-emerges-as-waters-future-in-kansas-city/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on June 20, 2011, 06:08:24 pm
Sounds like somebody Angelo would target, ie somebody who could be had cheaply.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on June 20, 2011, 07:03:32 pm
Posted by Mike Florio on June 20, 2011, 5:15 PM EDT
 
Getty Images
Earlier today, MDS posted an item based on recent comments from Hall of Fame running back Thurman Thomas.  Apart from remarks regarding the possibility that Falcons running back Michael Turner won’t be able to continue to absorb a pounding without help, Thomas suggested that he would have had a much better NFL career if he had played for the Cowboys, like Emmitt Smith, or the Lions, like Barry Sanders.
 
“I talk to Emmitt and Barry Sanders a lot too,” Thomas said.  “I said you know what, you guys have about two or three thousand yards more than I do, but come December I was playing in ice.  I was playing in snow.  If I was playing in Dallas or inside like Barry I’d probably would have another 3,000 yards.  I could have been the all-time leading rusher if I didn’t play on ice, sleet and snow.”  (As MDS noted, Thomas was more than two or three thousand behind Smith’s all-time career high-water mark.)
 
There’s a name that Thomas didn’t mention — and he arguably was the best of them all.
 
As Larry Mayer of ChicagoBears.com told us via e-mail, “Walter Payton didn’t exactly compile his 16,726 career yards in the tropics!”
 
Then there’s the quality of the blocking that the elite tailbacks enjoyed.  Mayer points out that, in the first 10 years of Payton’s career, none of his offensive linemen made it to the Pro Bowl.  In contrast, six different Cowboys offensive linemen made it to Hawaii during Smith’s first 10 seasons, qualifying for a combined 22 Pro Bowls.  And in Thomas’  first 10 seasons with the Bills, five different offensive linemen were voted to a combined 11 Pro Bowls.
 
That’s not to take anything away from Thomas, Smith, and/or Sanders.  But if we’re going to start considering the numbers the all-time greats could have generated under different circumstances, it’s fair to consider the fact that Payton played in the elements, and he didn’t have a lot of help for most of his years in the league.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on June 21, 2011, 12:32:55 pm
Payton played mostly on teams with no other effective offensive weapons.

The QB's were guys like Gary huff, Mike Phipps, Vince Evans, Bob Avellini.

Other teams had only to stop Payton, which makes his records the more remarkable.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 21, 2011, 01:09:49 pm

 The greatness about some RB's is they dont need the rest of the team.

 They ARE the team.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on June 21, 2011, 07:06:18 pm
Michelle snubbed by South African President:

http://weaselzippers.us/2011/06/21/michelle-obama-snubbed-by-south-african-president-jacob-zuma/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on June 22, 2011, 05:58:26 am
Payton was the most complete running back to EVER where the uniform.  If he had the top gear like Dorsett or Dickerson, he would have been unstoppable.

He ran, he stiff armed, he contorted, he blocked - ferociously, he caught passes, he threw passes.  And when you score you flip it to the ref or one of your lineman.  I don't know that there will ever be another like him.  I was just blessed to be alive to see him through his entire career.

Favorite run of all time is still the one against the Chiefs.  Breaks about 7 tackles only to be brought down by the laces a yard from the end zone.  Pretty sure that was the game we won on a last second hail mary from Avellini to Greg Latta.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on June 22, 2011, 08:14:50 am
Yeah between Sweetness and Michael Jordan, Chicago has been blessed with two guys who are the best who ever lived at their respective positions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on June 22, 2011, 04:40:00 pm
I watched that Chiefs game. That guy was a class act top to bottom. I have only one football jersey. His. I still feel the game killed him before his time. He never got over 205 lbs. 205!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on June 22, 2011, 08:33:35 pm
Walter Payton is my all-time favorite sports hero.  I was at Soldier Field in 1977 when he set the single-game rushing record of 275 yards in 1977.  I thought it was odd that he was sitting on the bench by himself during the game.  As it turns out, he had 101 degree fever and the flu.  He had 40 rushes that day for a 6.8 ypc average.  Oh, and it was raining.  I missed Jordan's run in Chicago but was privileged to watch the best ever for his entire career.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 22, 2011, 11:45:27 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBk9YaTBo10 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBk9YaTBo10)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on June 23, 2011, 09:05:30 am
He was a Bear but he was a great footbal player.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 23, 2011, 11:47:18 am
Urlacher rips Soldier Field turf, London game, Dhani Jones’ bow tie
Posted by Michael David Smith on June 23, 2011, 12:32 PM EDT
 Getty ImagesBears linebacker Brian Urlacher had plenty to say in a radio interview Thursday morning, talking about the sorry state of the sod at Soldier Field, explaining why he doesn’t want to play in London this season and firing back at criticisms leveled by Dhani Jones.

Asked on ESPN 1000 in Chicago about Bears president Ted Phillips saying the grass at Soldier Field gives the Bears a home-field advantage, Urlacher said that’s not true, and in reality the grass at Soldier Field is “a disaster.”

“The weather I think is the biggest advantage we have against teams that don’t play in our weather,” Urlacher said, via Kevin Seifert of ESPN.com. “But we’re a fast defense. You put us on that FieldTurf eight home games a year? We’re going to be really fast. You put [Julius] Peppers on that turf? [Devin] Hester, with all those cuts on turf? [Johnny] Knox? All those guys. We’re going to be a little better, I think. Faster.”

The turf at Wembley Stadium in London likely won’t be in top condition for the October 23 Bears-Buccaneers game, but that’s not why Urlacher is unhappy about going there. Urlacher just seems to think it’s dumb for the NFL to play across the pond.

“No, I’m not excited to go to London,” Urlacher said. “I don’t understand why they do that. . . . I am not excited to go to London, I will say that.”

And as for the comments from Bengals linebacker Dhani Jones that Urlacher isn’t one of the 10 best linebackers in the NFL, Urlacher decided to rip Jones’ style of dress.

“I think we were drafted in the same class, right? Is he a 2000 guy? I haven’t heard anything about him since then,” Urlacher said. “I saw him on a TV show with a bow-tie on though. So I know him better for how the way he dresses than what he does on a football field. Guys are going to talk. I’ve definitely had a lot worse things said publicly from guys, so I can live with it.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on June 23, 2011, 01:07:37 pm
Thanks Jackie. Made my day.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on June 23, 2011, 03:10:31 pm
In case you don't know, Dhani Jones was a guest on the NFL Channel last week.

The other guys had asked him to rate his top 10 active linebackers.

They ripped him because he left off urlacher and put himself seventh.

The other ex player commentators totally discredited Jones for that move.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on June 23, 2011, 04:21:27 pm
The other ex player commentators totally discredited Jones for that move.

Glad somebody did
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 23, 2011, 09:36:31 pm
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82073ac2/article/why-the-bears-can-repeat-as-nfc-north-champions?module=HP_cp2
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 24, 2011, 12:27:31 am
Urlacher rips Soldier Field turf, London game, Dhani Jones’ bow tie
Posted by Michael David Smith on June 23, 2011, 12:32 PM EDT
 Getty ImagesBears linebacker Brian Urlacher had plenty to say in a radio interview Thursday morning, talking about the sorry state of the sod at Soldier Field, explaining why he doesn’t want to play in London this season and firing back at criticisms leveled by Dhani Jones.

Asked on ESPN 1000 in Chicago about Bears president Ted Phillips saying the grass at Soldier Field gives the Bears a home-field advantage, Urlacher said that’s not true, and in reality the grass at Soldier Field is “a disaster.”

“The weather I think is the biggest advantage we have against teams that don’t play in our weather,” Urlacher said, via Kevin Seifert of ESPN.com. “But we’re a fast defense. You put us on that FieldTurf eight home games a year? We’re going to be really fast. You put [Julius] Peppers on that turf? [Devin] Hester, with all those cuts on turf? [Johnny] Knox? All those guys. We’re going to be a little better, I think. Faster.”

The turf at Wembley Stadium in London likely won’t be in top condition for the October 23 Bears-Buccaneers game, but that’s not why Urlacher is unhappy about going there. Urlacher just seems to think it’s dumb for the NFL to play across the pond.

“No, I’m not excited to go to London,” Urlacher said. “I don’t understand why they do that. . . . I am not excited to go to London, I will say that.”

And as for the comments from Bengals linebacker Dhani Jones that Urlacher isn’t one of the 10 best linebackers in the NFL, Urlacher decided to rip Jones’ style of dress.

“I think we were drafted in the same class, right? Is he a 2000 guy? I haven’t heard anything about him since then,” Urlacher said. “I saw him on a TV show with a bow-tie on though. So I know him better for how the way he dresses than what he does on a football field. Guys are going to talk. I’ve definitely had a lot worse things said publicly from guys, so I can live with it.”

 What does Green Bay use?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on June 24, 2011, 10:55:01 am
Non Union Labor ? :D

Seriously, the guys who manage the GB turf are head and shoulders above the clowns the Park District uses. Not only do they win the friggen SB, but their turf is better to boot. A shame indeed.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on June 24, 2011, 10:56:11 am
Does GB have a hybrid grass/turf combo?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on June 24, 2011, 11:13:19 am
Do they hold any other events at lamblow during football season? The biggest problem with the Soldier Field turf is the wear and tear from high school and college games, concerts, and other bs that forces them to resod in the middle of winter when the grass can't take root.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on June 24, 2011, 12:02:19 pm
Green Bay has a grass synthetic mixture.  I imagine the field gets used for other things besides Packers football but nothing like the abuse Soldier Field takes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on June 24, 2011, 07:11:57 pm
What does Green Bay use?


Painstaking care by the ground crew.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on June 25, 2011, 06:15:42 am
They use a combination of artificial turf and grass, from what I heard last year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on June 25, 2011, 10:06:05 am
We use dirt. Someone forgot to tell 'em there's supposed to be grass mixed in with the dirt. I'm glad to see Urlacher speaking out about this, huge problem..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 26, 2011, 03:31:56 pm
We use dirt. Someone forgot to tell 'em there's supposed to be grass mixed in with the dirt. I'm glad to see Urlacher speaking out about this, huge problem..

 If we had a grass-hybrid field to play on...wonder if Cutler would have gotten hurt in the playoffs?

 I read about this some years back...L.E.D. GRASS...looks like grass and behaves like grass right?

 Except the stuff is really light emitting diodes...meaning the ends of the "grass" can LIGHT UP...

 so you are at the game... and the whole damn field sez... DRINK COKE!

 The ultimate in advertising.  :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 26, 2011, 05:27:00 pm

 Coach Lovie Smith and his staff are using this unusual offseason to gain a better understanding of their team, their opponents and the NFL. They have undertaken projects they never would have had time for in a typical offseason.

Smith calls it "football enrichment."

"We would like to have the players out here, but it's not like we don't have anything to do," he said. "I can't say I'm getting bored. It's the opposite. There is learning every day. It has been awesome."

In the absence of players, the staff has been coaching each other in daily clinics. Sometimes offensive coaches mix with defensive coaches to share strategies, but usually coaches stay on their side of the ball.

For instance, offensive coordinator Mike Martz will show how he teaches quarterbacks to throw. Defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli will conduct a pass-rushing seminar. And so it goes down the line.

On Monday, former Buccaneers and Colts coach Tony Dungy, whom Smith and Marinelli assisted in Tampa, will visit Halas Hall to share some ideas.

"We're just going to talk football for a day," Smith said. "There aren't a whole lot of us still in our system who believe in it the way we do. We're pumped up about him coming."

Extensive self-scouting has been a part of the offseason. Coaches have gone over every decision they made last year, critiquing how everything was done and searching for ways to improve.

Smith and his staff also have spent extra time planning for their early-season opponents. Last week, they simulated the week before the opener against the Falcons, going over what they would do each day.

Bears coaches also have examined thoroughly their NFC North opponents, especially their closest NFL neighbor.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 28, 2011, 12:07:06 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_N1OjGhIFc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_N1OjGhIFc)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on June 28, 2011, 11:22:48 am
I loved that one. The mix of rage and wanting to just start screaming epithets about the Bears coupled with what was left of his restraint is one for the ages.  I think the last I saw of him he was coaching Omaha.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on June 29, 2011, 01:46:36 pm
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports that the Bears are determined to reel in a big wide receiver and he "wouldn't completely dismiss the possibility" of Chad Ochocinco landing in Chicago this summer. Ochocinco counts as a big receiver in comparison to the Bears' collection of small, quicker receivers.
 

Other possibilities are tantalizing because they could weaken one of their division rivals.  They could lure away the Vikings' Sidney Rice with a big free agent contract offer or loot the Packers roster by signing physical receiver James Jones.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on June 29, 2011, 04:30:48 pm
Chad Johnson would be fine by me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on June 29, 2011, 05:16:55 pm
Tell me why that should surprise me?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on June 29, 2011, 05:28:54 pm

 We'll just have to come to the conclusion that posts are going to be dropped on this board.

 Which they are. Thats living in the modern age...or the ice age.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on June 30, 2011, 10:58:05 am
If the Bears get anyone it will probably be TJ Housemanzadeh- it fits Angelo's MO- he's cheap and he can say he addressed the situation without dissing the current WR on the team. Will it work out ? I kind of doubt it- Ive never been a TJ fan- when was hungry he was good, but his head has outgrown his ability.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on June 30, 2011, 02:10:49 pm
speaking of dropping posts, I know I posted a little while ago that I would like Sidney Rice.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on July 01, 2011, 04:51:24 am
I like fried rice
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 01, 2011, 01:45:44 pm
Haha, so do I.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 01, 2011, 02:48:29 pm

 The list of F.A. WR's is still pretty impressive.

 Anyone for T.O.?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 01, 2011, 02:53:12 pm
damaged goods.

Martz likes smurfs that can run routes and catch.  I hear Lance Moore's name bandied about.

Cullen Jenkins (http://packersnews.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20110618/PKR01/110618032/Analysis-Who-ll-stay-leave-free-agency-?odyssey=tab|topnews|img|FRONTPAGE) anyone?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 01, 2011, 02:59:52 pm
damaged goods.

Martz likes smurfs that can run routes and catch.  I hear Lance Moore's name bandied about.

Cullen Jenkins (http://packersnews.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20110618/PKR01/110618032/Analysis-Who-ll-stay-leave-free-agency-?odyssey=tab|topnews|img|FRONTPAGE) anyone?

 Lance Moore? Dont know what he'd do that we dont already have.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 01, 2011, 03:55:45 pm
TO is contemplating retirement since he needs surgery on his ACL I think it was.  He won't be playing this year anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 01, 2011, 05:06:15 pm
Cutler helping Enderle learn Bears' system
By Jeff Dickerson

CHICAGO -- Life is difficult for every quarterback attempting to learn the Mike Martz offense.
 
Now imagine being a rookie fifth-round draft choice out of the University of Idaho without the luxury of voluntary offseason workouts, OTAs or minicamps.
 
Welcome to Nate Enderle's world.

As ESPNChicago.com previously reported, the Bears rookie quarterback began participating in the team's unofficial offensive workouts this week, the first step towards trying to pick up some of the offense before the Bears officially begin training camp once the NFL lockout ends.
 
"I knew it was really important for me to start throwing the routes they were going to have me throw, and start to get the basics of the offensive down ... the terminology, the formations and motions, things like that," Enderle told ESPNChicago.com Thursday evening. "That way I can come into camp with a moderate amount of knowledge about what we run."
 
For most rookies, getting to know the veterans is just as important as getting to know the system. Enderle describes his initial meetings with Bears starting quarterback Jay Cutler as extremely positive. Cutler, according to Enderle, has gone out of his way to try and ease the rookie's transition to the NFL.
 
"[Jay Cutler] was one of the first guys who texted me and told me that they were throwing," Enderle said. "He was very helpful. He said I could stay with him if I didn't have a place to stay. Everything he's done has been very helpful to me.
 
"They've all been really helpful. You never know what to expect when you join a new team, but the guys are great and helping me as much as they can. They try to teach me things in the short time we have. I felt good [throwing]. It's the same routes the team had me throwing on Pro Day and at the NFL Combine, so I was a little more adjusted to the types of throws they are going to ask me to make."
 
Perhaps Enderle's only regret is that he wasn't able to join the workouts sooner -- Cutler and fellow quarterback Caleb Hanie began throwing to the skill position players in May. A minor mix-up caused the quarterback to arrive on the scene in late June, but he did keep busy on the University of Idaho campus in the months following the draft.
 
"I got a heads up they were [holding workouts] but I didn't know it was a continual thing," Enderle explained. "I thought they were doing it one week, and that week I couldn't get down there. So I never attempted again, but once I found out they were still doing it, I got my ticket and got here as soon as I could.
 
"[Before that] I'd head into the Idaho weight room and work out then find somebody there to throw with. We had a few other guys on the team that were trying to play professional football, so whenever they were in town, I'd round them up and throw with them. Basically, I tried to do what I had done the few couple weeks of summer while I was playing for Idaho because I never went home in the summer, I'd just stay up there and do my own thing for a few weeks before conditioning started."
 
Whether or not Enderle's participation in the workouts causes him to perform better in training camp is unknown. After all, the Bears are conducting these sessions without defenders being present. But it can't hurt, that's for sure, especially since the entire 2011 NFL draft class is operating at a disadvantage because of the lockout.
 
"Whatever help I can get I'm going to take it," Enderle said. "If there is a chance it's going to make me more successful, I'm going to try that. It's a tough step to take the NFL, and you need to be prepared, because I have less preparation time. Everybody else has more experience than I have, they had rookie camps, OTAs, all that stuff to get the offense installed in your head. I just have training camp. But that's just one thing everybody that got drafted this year is going to have to work through."
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 02, 2011, 06:06:18 am
JJ, I agree.  I would love to get a tall red zone target like Fried Rice.  Jay probably misses those fun times of tossing a jump ball to Marshall and knowing it's six.  But you can't deny that Martz has influence over offensive personnel decisions (LeFevour, Todd fuucking Collins, Enderle, Fat Manu, sitting Dez Clark and Aroma, etc).  I was just going by what the Madman prefers (Moore, James Jones, anyone under 5'10" who can run).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 02, 2011, 09:50:45 am
TO?  TO who?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 02, 2011, 10:03:34 am
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6707492

Terrell Owens has a torn ACL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 02, 2011, 10:05:42 am
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/Vote-for-the-greatest-Bear-070111

I voted for Walter Payton.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 02, 2011, 03:33:21 pm
JJ, I agree.  I would love to get a tall red zone target like Fried Rice.  Jay probably misses those fun times of tossing a jump ball to Marshall and knowing it's six.  But you can't deny that Martz has influence over offensive personnel decisions (LeFevour, Todd fuucking Collins, Enderle, Fat Manu, sitting Dez Clark and Aroma, etc).  I was just going by what the Madman prefers (Moore, James Jones, anyone under 5'10" who can run).

 The deal is any FA can come into camp at WR...lets bring as many in as we can do.

 These guys wouldnt be over the hill in many cases.

 Martz would have to go with at least one grade A F.A. to give Cutler some breathing room.

 This may be the plan all along as the draft produced nothing at WR.

 We didnt draft a D.E., we hired one...the results were instantanious. Peppers.

 Suddenly...we were the next best team after G.B. in the NFC.

 Theres so many F.A. WR's on the market that at least ONE of them has to fit in.

 Fuuuck...even Martz has to see that. Even he knows you gotta feed Cutler.  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 03, 2011, 06:28:11 am
One fact posted on that poll was that Payton missed 12 games in his career?  What did I watch, I only recall on game, unless they are counting games he didn't start in his rookie year.  Anyone else have a read on that?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 03, 2011, 09:02:57 am
I just do not see them paying a lot of money for a WR.  They'll probably get a mid level veteran and hope that Knox and Bennett step up and cling to that maddening perennial blind faith that the pass pro improves.  Maybe they spend more money on a Jenkins or another DT FA (http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_18382191) whether or not they sign Adams.  Stocking up on DL is their MO.

A really ballsy and unlikely move is to drop a pot of gold on Asomugha or Johnathan Joseph (http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22475988/30371742).

I bet there are plenty of under the table ready made deals just ready to be signed once the starting bell sounds.  With Cutler and Peppers the last couple years, it would be fun to see the Bears splash FA headlines once again.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 03, 2011, 11:34:09 am
Griz, I was always under the impression he only missed one game.  He wanted to play but the coaches made him sit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 03, 2011, 05:50:14 pm
I just do not see them paying a lot of money for a WR.  They'll probably get a mid level veteran and hope that Knox and Bennett step up and cling to that maddening perennial blind faith that the pass pro improves.  Maybe they spend more money on a Jenkins or another DT FA (http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_18382191) whether or not they sign Adams.  Stocking up on DL is their MO.

A really ballsy and unlikely move is to drop a pot of gold on Asomugha  or Johnathan Joseph (http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22475988/30371742).

I bet there are plenty of under the table ready made deals just ready to be signed once the starting bell sounds.  With Cutler and Peppers the last couple years, it would be fun to see the Bears splash FA headlines once again.

 If we brought Asomugha into the mix the knock on him would be he doesnt fit our "system."

 Hey you know what...fuuuuck the system...if it was so goddamn good you wouldnt be watching G.B. in the Superbowl.

 Asomugha is a shutdown artist...you think he gives a fuuuck about a "system?"  Hire him.

 Probably out of our reach tho coinwise...hes not coming cheap.

 But man would he look good in Navy and Orange!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on July 04, 2011, 02:41:04 pm
The post about the 12 games is wrong.  Payton missed one game, and that game said he could have played.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 04, 2011, 05:29:25 pm
The post about the 12 games is wrong.  Payton missed one game, and that game said he could have played.

 He had the flu or some damn thing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 04, 2011, 07:33:03 pm
It was his rookie year I think and the coaches held him out.

When he had the flu and a high fever he had an unbelieveable game.  Ran all over the opponent.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 07, 2011, 11:49:50 am
Frankly, the vid is pi$$ poor at times.  But it compiles all the returns with original play by play and no music...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwXHdPTFfZ4&playnext=1&list=PL3BAA41A1834C3F68
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on July 07, 2011, 12:17:13 pm
Thanks VJ, that was fun to watch!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on July 07, 2011, 01:35:25 pm
Makes you wonder how the new kickoff rules will change things.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 07, 2011, 03:59:04 pm
Makes you wonder how the new kickoff rules will change things.....

 Great one about Hester VJ!

 And B4E does bring up some interesting points about rules changes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on July 08, 2011, 11:58:14 am
Yes, the "Hester" rules may slow down Devin quite a bit.  Still, the dude ran back a field goal!!!  Who does that stuff?  Maybe he can overcome it.  This will be what, his 6th year...too bad we wasted a couple on the WR experiment!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on July 08, 2011, 12:34:23 pm
That Hester video is fantastic. I couldn't even count the number of times the word unbelievable came from the announcers mouths. I think my favourite was when the announcers are discussing the possibility of an onsides kick and Joe Theisman says "I'd kick it deep"...LOL
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 06:12:43 pm
Hester was truly unique in his ability to run back Kicks.  The Bears have made a lot of mistakes over the years, but the worst one was to let him split his time between WR and KR.  There has never been anyone like him, and there almost certainly never will be.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on July 08, 2011, 06:45:37 pm
What suprises me is the number of those that he returned when the Bears were trailing to give them a spark to win.  I would say, without rewatching and counting, that 70% of those the Bears were losing when he did his thing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on July 08, 2011, 07:33:22 pm
Devin Hester.  You. Are. Ridiculous!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on July 09, 2011, 09:33:03 am
I guess they are meeting again next week?  They are like Washington pols, taking it down to the wire. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 09, 2011, 04:22:25 pm
Hester was truly unique in his ability to run back Kicks.  The Bears have made a lot of mistakes over the years, but the worst one was to let him split his time between WR and KR.  There has never been anyone like him, and there almost certainly never will be.

 Yep. He had his prioritys and DAA BEARRSSE caved in on the contract that he would be a WR.

 When what we really needed was a real WR.

 Hesters good at being a WR...but he is not great...and we need a great one.

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: JBN on July 12, 2011, 06:21:46 pm
Word on the Street: Plaxico Burress heading to Chicago?  

http://www.csnchicago.com/pages/word_on_the_street?awid=4707445825083608565
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 12, 2011, 07:12:26 pm
Burress would help immediately but we still need o-line help.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on July 12, 2011, 10:20:41 pm
As a Super Bowl Green Bay packer fan I would hope Burress goes to the bear. Your the last state in the union which doesn't have a concealed carry law and an open carry might reduce the chances he shots himself.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 12, 2011, 10:39:09 pm
Pretty sure he can't carry or own a gun now period.  Plus he did a great speech at the rookie symposiuom telling them about his mistakes and how not to make them.  I think he has got his **** wired now and will be awesome for the next team that gets him whoever that team may be.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 13, 2011, 06:33:54 am
I find that article unbelievable for a couple of reasons. The main one is that there can be no conversation between players and management.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 13, 2011, 08:16:21 am
I find that article unbelievable for a couple of reasons. The main one is that there can be no conversation between players and management.

Heh, it's like college recruiting violations.  Everyone does it.  It's arbitrary and rare as to who gets caught.  The agents and management are talking a ton for sure. 

IMO, there really isn't a huge market for Plax because of the time off and the in season physical adjustment he would have to endure.  He did have injury issues even when he played well with the Giants.  FWIW, Plax did put the Bears in his top 3.  But I suspect he would put any local team in his top 3 depending on who is interviewing him at the time.  The Trib (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-hester-wants-bears-to-sign-santana-moss-20110712,0,5447028.story) and the Suntimes (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/6485119-606/bears-arent-keen-on-plaxico-burress.html) are for all intents and purposes ruling it out.

The line is waaaaay more important to me.  I'd rather see them sign an decent option vet who can play inside because the jury is still out on Williams and the ACL less Garza ain't gettin' any younger.  They will start Webb (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/6482990-606/bears-ot-jmarcus-webb-will-likely-be-protecting-jay-cutlers-blind-side.html) at left and Carimi at right and go from there.  I would be somewhat surprised if Kruetz doesn't come back.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 13, 2011, 11:21:48 am
Plaxico is a tool and a cancer.  He'd last about 2 days with Martz.

No thanks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 13, 2011, 11:50:51 am
I am so ready for some football news.  Lets finish the CBA already!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 13, 2011, 12:24:59 pm
Heh, it's like college recruiting violations.  Everyone does it.  It's arbitrary and rare as to who gets caught.  The agents and management are talking a ton for sure. 

IMO, there really isn't a huge market for Plax because of the time off and the in season physical adjustment he would have to endure.  He did have injury issues even when he played well with the Giants.  FWIW, Plax did put the Bears in his top 3.  But I suspect he would put any local team in his top 3 depending on who is interviewing him at the time.  The Trib (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-hester-wants-bears-to-sign-santana-moss-20110712,0,5447028.story) and the Suntimes (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/6485119-606/bears-arent-keen-on-plaxico-burress.html) are for all intents and purposes ruling it out.

The line is waaaaay more important to me.  I'd rather see them sign an decent option vet who can play inside because the jury is still out on Williams and the ACL less Garza ain't gettin' any younger.  They will start Webb (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/6482990-606/bears-ot-jmarcus-webb-will-likely-be-protecting-jay-cutlers-blind-side.html) at left and Carimi at right and go from there.  I would be somewhat surprised if Kruetz doesn't come back.

Yeah, I put no faith the Bears will go after Plaxico. And I agree about getting a OG/C . Thats what we need. Besides we may already have a big receiver. The Canadian kid sounds pretty good. Its hard to come back after being off for 2 years. I am not sure Plaxico can.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 13, 2011, 03:13:14 pm
Plexico is the big WR that you and others have been screaming about all off season. 

If the Bears sign him I would have no probs with that signing at all!  Hell get Santana Moss in here too!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 13, 2011, 03:59:53 pm
Plaxico is a tool and a cancer.  He'd last about 2 days with Martz.

No thanks.

You're something else.  You say Plax is a tool & cancer and you don't want him but you can't stand Knox and Hester either.  Last I checked neither has been in trouble but yet you don't want them on the team either! 

What kind of player do you want? 

Sometimes you have to roll the dice on a player like Plaxico who wasn't a problem on the Giants team.  I haven't heard a player on the Giants complained about him as a teammate.  His problem was obviously off the field with him shooting himself in a night club. 

You claim Martz can't work with him?  He's the guru!  He's getting what he wanted and that's a big target for his QB! 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 13, 2011, 04:12:05 pm

 Oh shiiiit lets calm the fuuuuck down ..

 this isnt about a goddamn piiiiising contest at to whose right or wrong...

 we've all been proven right or wrong in the past.

 Lets think together. Whats best for DAA BEARRSSE?

 G.B. fans are laffing at us on this board.

 THAT...you cannot accept!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 13, 2011, 04:37:58 pm
Plexico is the big WR that you and others have been screaming about all off season. 

If the Bears sign him I would have no probs with that signing at all!  Hell get Santana Moss in here too!

I doubt you'd have a problem with Charles Manson either if he could play football.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 13, 2011, 05:03:26 pm
I doubt you'd have a problem with Charles Manson either if he could play football.

  The problem with Charles Manson is he was fuuucked up at a slot and was worth shiiiiit at flanker.

 Which has nothing to do with the conversation.

 I dont know where this is coming down at WR...

 first of all we dont even have a TEAM that exists...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 13, 2011, 06:32:36 pm
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/Martz-Bears-could-be-ready-quickly-for-Hall-game-54471904
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 13, 2011, 06:35:32 pm
Burress killed the Pack in the NY/GB NFC championship game.  I believe that he had 11 catches against Al Harris.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 13, 2011, 09:50:12 pm

 The deal is you could have 20'000 F.A. WR's in training camp...

 but it comes down to a looksee.

 Whats best for Cutler?

 We wont know until we go thru em.

 I hope we get every F.A. WR in camp.   ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 14, 2011, 03:27:00 pm
Yeah that damn Burress is a cancer all right.....

http://web.yesnetwork.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110613&content_id=20448762&oid=35007&vkey=9
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on July 14, 2011, 04:02:08 pm
I would think that from a career-reestablishment perspective, Plax would be on his very best behavior, trying his hardest.  And he was pretty damned good before he shot himself in the leg.

:  )

A recent example of this is Michael Vick, he did his time and came out a better human, teammate and quarterback...

I wouldn't gripe at all if they signed Burress.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 14, 2011, 04:35:48 pm
Besides what does the Bears have to lose?  Sign him on the cheap for a year.  If he doesn't produce or gets himself in trouble then you can simply let him walk and move on in another direction.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 14, 2011, 07:05:01 pm
First of all its not up to any of us here on the board as to whether the Bears need or dont think they need another WR let alone Burress. If the Bears think they need him and sign him then I will support him as a Bear. Do I think they will sign him? I really doubt it. If Dungy goes to Angelo or to our OC and puts in a good word for Plaxico then maybe something might happen, who knows. I still wonder how much he has left after being 33 and missing 2 years of football.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 14, 2011, 07:20:31 pm
Burress' effect will be appreciated by a team if they make the play-offs.  He should be in full stride by then and definitely is a big game player.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 14, 2011, 08:27:02 pm
I would have no problem with them signing Burress.  Cutler needs a big guy that can go up and get the ball.  It is part of Cutlers game he does not have here.

That said I will not be mad if they don't get Burress.  I would like one big receiver for him with talent.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 14, 2011, 08:58:28 pm
The Bears already have the big Canadian signed to a futures contract.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 14, 2011, 09:05:47 pm
Yeah I am hoping he works out but that is kind of a long shot. 

Don't get me wrong I would much rather the Bears spend their considerable cap space on O-line help first and for most in free agency.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: JBN on July 14, 2011, 10:45:59 pm
I doubt you'd have a problem with Charles Manson either if he could play football

I doubt you'd have a problem with Charles Manson either if he could take Adam Dunn's place on the White Sox.

If they can sign him, I say sign him. They aren't out anything.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 15, 2011, 06:58:30 am
I doubt you'd have a problem with Charles Manson either if he could play football

I doubt you'd have a problem with Charles Manson either if he could take Adam Dunn's place on the White Sox.

If they can sign him, I say sign him. They aren't out anything.

You bet I'd have a problem with Manson. The problem I have with Dunn is KW. He needs to go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 15, 2011, 07:11:59 am
Yeah I am hoping he works out but that is kind of a long shot. 

Don't get me wrong I would much rather the Bears spend their considerable cap space on O-line help first and for most in free agency.

Hey, the Bears play a lot of long shots. The guy was quite successful up north. They may actually believe he is all they need. He is supposed to replace Aroma.

We all hope he works out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 15, 2011, 09:18:54 am
I don't see Burress being a fit in Martz system...  irregardless of whether he actually has cleaned up his act or it's just a front.

Big slow WRs with limited intelligence and discipline aren't the guys Martz' scheme is designed for.

There's also the very basic question of what two years in jail, followed by the lockout, has done to his physical condition.  Simply put, is he even physically capable of playing football at the NFL level anymore?

OTOH pretty much everything Martz tried with his young, "prototype" style WRs last year failed miserably.  So maybe radical change is in order.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on July 15, 2011, 09:55:36 am
The man has a hole in his leg.  That said, if he is a fast as he was, sign him up. The time off didn't seem to hurt Vick. Urlacher was off a year and the press spoke of how it extended his career. Why can't the same be said of Buress? Prison changes people, though personally I can't see what he did warrenting 18 mos in Prison.  Sign the man up. If he's no good cut him. Its not like the Bears haven't done that before.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 15, 2011, 01:15:05 pm

I doubt you'd have a problem with Charles Manson either if he could take Adam Dunn's place on the White Sox.


LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 15, 2011, 02:14:04 pm
Hell throw in Alex  Rios too in that mix!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 15, 2011, 02:46:23 pm
I see you are a wonderful White Sox fan. I see you know all the players names. I dont know any White Sox player named Jose Rios. ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 15, 2011, 03:20:29 pm
PFT is saying they have almost all of the CBA items finished up.  Ready for some football talk already...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 15, 2011, 03:21:53 pm
We've been talking football the last few days!  I'll be going to the game in Nashville as soon as the tickets go on sale.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 15, 2011, 05:18:13 pm
ESPN is saying there are still some minor rules to iron out and camps could open by July 25th
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 16, 2011, 07:49:51 am
Yapper how can the Pats continue to franchise and restrict the movement of Mankins? He isnt a 4 yr man and according to the Pats web site he is a 7 yr pro.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 16, 2011, 08:03:34 am
That's great news! 

Phil - Are you talking about going to the exhibition game when the Bears arrive?  Asuuming they arrive and all.  I might attend also, kind of up in the air right now, but if the price is right, I may just go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 16, 2011, 10:24:58 am
No surprise here...

Source: NFL lockout likely to cancel Bears-Rams Hall of Fame game (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/6533665-606/source-nfl-lockout-likely-to-cancel-bears-rams-hall-of-fame-game.html)

The Bears remain hopeful they will play plenty of football this season, just not as much as scheduled.  Despite optimism that the NFL lockout that has dragged on for four months might be over soon, the labor impasse claimed its first game. Two sources said Friday that the Hall of Fame Game on Aug. 7 in Canton, Ohio, between the Bears and St. Louis Rams has been cancelled. A source outside the Bears said the teams were informed by the league, and a team source said word was out among key figures in the organization.  A new labor deal could be ratified at the NFL owners meeting July 21 in Atlanta. The Players Association, which decertified in March, would reform for a vote, and the deal could be completed. But with a couple days designated for signing draft picks and adding undrafted free agents — and a couple more days for standard free agency — it is unlikely teams would report to training camp before July 27 or 28, the source said.  The Bears have about 50 players under contract and will have to fill massive holes. The agreement might allow teams to jump from 80 to 90 players in training camps.

Mike Martz doesn't believe Bears need a big receiver (http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2011/07/mike_martz_doesnt_believe_bears_need_big_receiver.html)

Mike Martz told the Associated Press that "size doesn't make any difference" in his offense.

"It makes absolutely no difference," the Bears offensive coordinator told the Associated Press. "With Matt [Forte] as a runner and our ability to run the ball, we get a lot of one-on-one coverage, and you have to have receivers that can beat corners one on one. And generally, the guys that can change direction and run fast - those are the kinds of guys that you're looking for.  If he's a big guy that can do all that, that's a rare find. A lot of times, those guys are more 5-10 guys."

Martz said he would also like to get the ball more to Devin Hester and that emphasis wouldn't adversely affect the receiver's contributions on special teams.

"We don't want to do anything to diminish that," Martz said.

As for the offensive line, Martz said he assumes center Olin Kreutz will re-sign and that rookie Gabe Carimi can fit in quick. He admitted to the Associated Press that the offensive line was "the biggest issue." But he said Roberto Garza helped the unit run the ball better.

DT Brandon Mebane makes sense for Bears (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/28376/dt-brandon-mebane-makes-sense-for-bears)

Over on FoxSports.com, former Baltimore Ravens coach Brian Billick recently posted a list of the top 10 presumed free-agent defensive linemen (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/Top-NFL-free-agent-defensive-linemen-071211). It's worth noting that four of the top five played in the NFC North last season.  But I'm less interested in where Ray Edwards, Cullen Jenkins, Tommie Harris and Cliff Avril will play in 2011 than in who might be joining one of our teams. (All indications, by the way, are that Avril will be a restricted free agent and thus will return to the Lions.)  Billick's ninth-ranked defensive lineman almost certainly is of some interest to the Chicago Bears, who are expected to be $37 million below the salary cap when free agency opens. I'm not in the business of indiscriminately throwing names against the wall just to foster free-agent discussion, but I think you'll agree that there are more than a few reasons to tie the Bears to defensive tackle Brandon Mebane, who played the first four years of his career with the Seattle Seahawks.

FOX Sports Top free agents: Offensive linemen (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/Billick-Top-NFL-free-agents-offensive-lineman-071211)

4. Logan Mankins: G, New England
In his shortened 2010 season, Mankins re-energized the New England running game with two unknown ball carriers: BenJarvus Green-Ellis and Danny Woodhead. That combination led to a rushing attack that produced 123-yards per game, good for ninth in the league.

Potential landing spots: Chicago, Miami, New England

Mankins is obviously unhappy with his contract situation in New England, but for the second year in a row, the Patriots have placed the franchise tag on him. With the current rules in place, Chicago would have to give up two first-round picks to acquire Mankins, and I think that's a little rich for the Bears, especially after drafting Gabe Carimi in the first round. Miami is also a possibility for Mankins, but like the Bears, two first-round picks is too rich and they were pleased with landing draft pick Mike Pouncey.

6. Davin Joseph: G, Tampa Bay
Joseph was well on his way to his best year as a pro in 2010, but he fractured his foot after starting the first 11 games of the season. Joseph is a superior run blocker with better than average pass protection skills, and will be a sought-after interior lineman.

Potential landing spots: Chicago, Miami, Tampa Bay

Chicago will look to improve its offensive line with anyone that hits the open market, but the Bears showed steady improvement last year and after drafting Gabe Carimi, they don’t have to overpay for a specific position. Miami had the 21st-ranked rushing attack last season, and they may be interested in adding another interior lineman to go along with draft pick, Mike Pouncey. Tampa Bay still makes the most sense as a young team ready to make the final steps to becoming an annual playoff contender, and I believe Joseph will want to be a part of that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 16, 2011, 11:03:04 am
2 WRs that intrigue me the most -- Braylon Edwards and Randy Moss.  Braylon is only 28 and that one monster season with Cleveland shows the potential he has with the size and speed combination.  The gigantic obstacle?  Catch and hold onto the goddamn ball and he can still be a star.  Randy?  For whatever reason, at 34 I think he still got the skills and can ball...When...He...Wants...To.  I remember just before NE traded him how he just schooled Revis island.

I suppose the safest option is Santonio.  The guy who fits Madmike's scheme the most would be Santana Moss.

Any chance Haynesworth gets cut?  ;D 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 16, 2011, 03:38:35 pm
I'd be fine with either Sanatana or Santonio.  Kind of starting to get excited about free agency!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 16, 2011, 06:35:17 pm
Re: Martz' commemt  om WR size: Big WRs make better blockers for running plays and supporting the RAC of the passing game.  No doubt about that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 16, 2011, 06:49:35 pm
I hope we get one of those 2 OGs. I'd love Mankins. The rumor I heard that supposedly held up agreement to a new CBA was owners insistance of having the right of first refusal to players who were FAs, I suppose which includes Mankins.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 16, 2011, 08:10:55 pm
 I'm wondering at this point in time...havent we already built the OL?

 The big guys are all signed. Mankins is going to command top dollar.

 Davin Joseph is a player that would improve the team... BUT...

 why do we have all of those other guys that got drafted and are signed like Herman Johnson?

 Theres X amount of money...

 the OL DID need help...did we get what we wanted via the draft and F.A. so far?

 I dont know. Training camp would sure clear up things.

 TICE took a bunch of chumps and formed them into somthing which stood the test...

 except against our freinds in G.B.

 We need help at OL...but do we already HAVE the help at OL and not even know it yet?

 Because they have never played as a unit? We dont know. So when it comes to Mankins...etc...F.A.,

 thats a pretty high price to pay when what we have has never played together,

 before we even get Mankins.

 I like to think that TICE has seen what came of what he built ... and wants to improve on it.

 That he may just have ... everything that he already needs.  ???

 IF...thats a big IF...Deeeeetroit or G.B. are in a bidding war for Asomugha... we better be in on that.  :D

 You dont want this guy loose in the NFC NORTH...unless its in Navy and Orange.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 16, 2011, 09:07:49 pm
JJ, the interior still needs help. Martz even admits it. He said that when Garza came back they were able to run the ball better. Big Herman Johnson hasnt proved squat. I'd rather have a proven run blocker such as Mankins for the left side than depend on Herman to beat somebody out for LG.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 16, 2011, 09:21:54 pm
JJ, the interior still needs help. Martz even admits it. He said that when Garza came back they were able to run the ball better. Big Herman Johnson hasnt proved squat. I'd rather have a proven run blocker such as Mankins for the left side than depend on Herman to beat somebody out for LG.

 My problem is I havent seen this OL unit on the same field of play yet that TICE has built...

 if we can get Mankins its a no brainer.

 But if we cant ... what do we already have?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 16, 2011, 09:58:29 pm
JJ, I'd rather not have to trust Tice to develop Herman Johnson come training camp and deal with his faults till he does develop sufficiently. You do realize that we havent had any OTAs or contact between coaches and players since March. I dont believe Herman Johnson even logged a minutes time last year. I think he was solely a PS player. With all the OG problems we had and he couldnt get on the field doesnt bode well for having to depend on him to start. We need some road graders for that interior line both to run the ball as well as pass protect. Give me a vet OG please and may he be top notch quality. We need to protect Cutler, not put him on life support. You saw what happened in the NFC championship game, you know that line needs an overhaul. Carimi is just the tip of the iceberg not the final piece to the puzzle
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 17, 2011, 11:05:17 am
TICE took a bunch of chumps and formed them into somthing which stood the test...

I would say they barely survived more than anything.  If we are willing drop big money on either Mankins or Asom, I would actually rather pick Mankins...assuming we solidify our DT with or without Adams.  If Asom backed up Detroit's line, obviously that would suck.  IMO, it is more important for this team to protect the QB 1st, open up running lanes 2nd.  As bad as the Giants game was, the Jets game was damn fun to watch.  Cutler was able to 5/7 step drop, surveyed the scene and let it rip because of the great protection.  Furthermore, that game also proved that even with star corners that the Jets had, they were burned because they could not pressure Cutler.  The Bears need to pressure the QB especially up the middle.  If that happens, Peanut and company can be adequate for this defense.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 17, 2011, 11:33:20 am
For sure playing the Pack, need to put Rodgers on his ass. Can't let him get comfy..


IN regards to Burress, I say bring him on. What do we have to lose?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 17, 2011, 12:57:14 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-exbears-rb-cedric-benson-arrested-in-texas-20110717,0,177588.story

The guy just doesn't learn..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 17, 2011, 03:13:55 pm
You just dont mess with Texas. They will fix his wagon good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on July 17, 2011, 06:11:07 pm
Piece of work, no doubt about it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 17, 2011, 08:28:14 pm
From Pro Football Talk:

Logan Mankins could hold up settlement by demanding free agency

Posted by Mike Florio on July 17, 2011, 3:17 PM EDT

As the Brady antitrust action chugs toward conclusion, Ron Borges of the Boston Herald points out that, to the extent the settlement of the lawsuit depends on the approval of the men whose names appear on it, Patriots guard Logan Mankins could demand that he not be subject to the franchise tag in exchange for dropping the case.

Borges points to a dynamic we’ve mentioned several times — the fact that the plaintiffs in the Reggie White antitrust lawsuit received a lifetime exemption from the franchise tag as part of the 1993 settlement.

But that case was about securing free-agency rights, not about countering the league’s lockout leverage.  Before Saturday, when word emerged for the first time that the NFLPA* wants to restrict the franchise tag to only one year per player, there had been no suggestion that today’s players were disputing any aspect of the pre-2010 free agency rules.

Last time around, the NFLPA decertified after a failed strike, and after months of litigation ultimately secured a verdict that resulted in a settlement providing real free agency.  This time, the NFLPA shut down when backed against the wall via the threat of a lockout, and real negotiations toward a new labor deal began less than three months after the case was filed.

It arguably would represent the height of selfishness, then, for Mankins or any other named plaintiff to dig in his heels and request a cookie, especially since Mankins was at best an absentee litigant, participating in (as far as can tell via Google) none of the grueling and time-consuming talks that have placed the parties on the precipice of an agreement in principle.

Borges’ column seems to be sufficiently informed to suggest that someone close to the talks fed him with the idea, and with the notion that Mankins perhaps would accept in lieu of free agency the money he would have made if he hadn’t held out for a large chunk of the 2010 season.

And so the pink champagne remains on ice.  Hopefully, we won’t eventually have to hit someone upside the head with the bottle.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 17, 2011, 08:31:12 pm
Personally I hope that Mankins holds out for Free Agency. He doesnt want to be a Patriot. He has made that clear and no NFL team will trade for him or sign him if they lose 2 1sts doing so.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 18, 2011, 04:22:46 pm
Is Bears' offensive line set? (http://www.chicagotribune.com/site/newspaper/sports/ct-spt-0717-offensive-line-bears-chic20110716,0,5407012.story)

A fair number of experienced interior linemen will be on the market. Both Falcons guards, Justin Blalock and Harvey Dahl are unrestricted and Atlanta also must try to re-sign right tackle Tyson Clabo. One of the three could get away. The Ravens' Marshal Yanda is considered a strong player but getting teammate Chris Chester might be more realistic. While Chester might not be as big and skilled as Yanda, he has experience playing center and that would be a plus for a club that hasn't had a true backup there for a decade.  The Packers' Daryn Colledge also will be on the market and can play multiple positions. The Cowboys' Kyle Kosier is another option.  Count on the Bears finding a good number of undrafted college free agents, a pool with which Tice has had success in the past. Adding some young players to a mix that includes Lance Louis, Edwin Williams, Levi Horn, Johan Asiata and Herman Johnson would provide options. Then, the Bears would hope a couple of them can catch on quickly.


Bears Free Agency: What You Need to Know
(http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/grizzly-detail/Impending-Free-Agency-What-You-Need-to-Know-125757473.html)

-- According to the Sports Business Journal, the league will allow teams and agents three days to study the new collective bargaining agreement, then three days for teams to sign undrafted free agents and players who were the team last season before full free agency starts. That means that the Bears will already have a good idea of what their needs are, because they'll know if Olin Kreutz, Danieal Manning, Anthony Adams and other key free agents are on the team.

-- The Bears aren't going to sign Plaxico Burress. I want it. You want it. He wants it. But that doesn't mean that Jerry Angelo and Lovie Smith want it.  In fact, don't expect the Bears to go after a big-name wide receiver. The Bears don't have a true No. 1 receiver, but they made it to the NFC Championship without one in the first year under a new, complicated offense. They may pick up someone for depth, but it's not going to be the guy who helped you win your fantasy league.

-- The lines are what matter. Re-signing Adams and Kreutz is crucial, but keeping an eye out on the market will be important, too.

-- The extended off-season gave the Bears staff extra time to study available players. In the past, free agency started March 1. Even in years that the Bears didn't make the playoffs, the team barely had two months to prepare for free agency, and it was always before the draft. With the odd timing that the lockout created, the Bears know their needs and who is available better than they ever have. It's hard to do, but trust the experience of Jerry Angelo when free agency does begin. HAHAHA, I needed a good chuckle!

Scout's take: Moss vs. Burress (http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post/_/id/4670712/scouts-take-moss-vs-burress)

On Moss: “Dynamic receiver with good speed and quickness. Although he is up in age, he’s still a legitimate vertical threat with the burst to blow the top off coverage. He has a knack for producing explosive plays (plays of 20-plus yards) due to his speed and quickness. Moss is also a polished route runner with the ability to separate on short- and intermediate routes. He is at his best when used on "in-breaking" routes such as digs or crossers because he is able to run away from coverage."

On why Moss fits: “Moss is a route runner with the speed and quickness Martz prefers. His game is ideally suited to run the precise timing routes of the system, and his run-after-catch skills will result in big plays for the Bears. When you look at the success Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce enjoyed in that system, it’s easy to predict big numbers for Moss as a player for Martz.”

On Burress: “Big, physical receiver with excellent ball skills. He’s at his best with ball in the air. Burress utilizes his superior size and athleticism to "post up" smaller defenders. His exceptional length gives the quarterback a bigger target to pinpoint. He runs well for his size, but is not a considered a burner. He lacks the burst to outrun defenders on vertical routes. His big plays are often the result of jump balls down the field or smaller throws converted into big gains after he’s broken tackles in the open field. As a route runner, he is not fluid or polished in and out of his breaks due to his size. He relies on size and strength to gain separation rather than his quickness. Given his two-year absence from the game, it is very likely that he will struggle getting free from coverage.”

On why Burress doesn’t fit: “Martz has never featured a big receiver in his system because he has a preference for route runners. Most big receivers aren't able to get in and out of their breaks quickly, and that can throw off the timing of the passing game. While Burress would give the Bears a big, red zone target, he would struggle with some of the timing routes of the system. He’d seem like a misfit in that offense.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 18, 2011, 04:34:40 pm
some kool-aid on Carimi

Carimi left his mark at Wisconsin (http://www.chicagotribune.com/site/newspaper/sports/ct-spt-0717-bears-gabe-carimi-chicago20110716,0,3645570.story)

The look in Gabe Carimi's eyes told Bret Bielema all he needed to know.  As the Wisconsin coach leaned back in his office chair last week, he recalled the message Carimi, the Bears' first-round draft pick, emphatically relayed before last season's game with Iowa.

"I won't repeat the verbiage he used, but Gabe left no doubt in my mind that when in doubt, run behind him,'' Bielema said. "We did that on two drives that were instrumental in winning that game. We ran the same play to the left, I believe, six times in a row, and finally went in for a touchdown.  Gabe took control.''

Bielema has no doubt the mammoth offensive tackle will have just as much of an impact with the Bears once he gets used to the system — no matter which side of line he ends up playing.

"I think you see him playing wherever he's needed,'' Bielema said. "Gabe's the ultimate team player. I think he took a certain amount of pride in ultimate team player. I think he took a certain amount of pride in being the left tackle at the University of Wisconsin. The only two left tackles that have played that position for me have won the Outland Trophy.''

The other was Joe Thomas, who the Browns made the third-overall pick in 2007 NFL draft. Thomas has been to the Pro Bowl after each of his seasons.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 18, 2011, 05:15:48 pm
I'm surprised no one is talking about signing WR jones.

By Mark J. Miller

The word is that when the NFL's new collective bargaining agreement is finally settled teams will have 72 hours to re-sign their own free agents before everybody else gets a chance to make offers, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports.

The paper reports that there is only a 20 percent chance that Green Bay Packers wide receiver James Jones(notes) will be getting one of those offers and be back with the Pack when next season gets underway.

Last season, Jones had 50 receptions for 679 yards and five touchdowns, "but is prone to maddening drops," the paper reports, pointing out that he let "potential touchdown grabs slip through his fingers against" the Miami Dolphins, New York Jets, New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles and Pittsburgh Steelers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 18, 2011, 05:17:16 pm
I'm surprised no one is talking about signing WR Jones in Chi.

By Mark J. Miller

The word is that when the NFL's new collective bargaining agreement is finally settled teams will have 72 hours to re-sign their own free agents before everybody else gets a chance to make offers, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports.

The paper reports that there is only a 20 percent chance that Green Bay Packers wide receiver James Jones(notes) will be getting one of those offers and be back with the Pack when next season gets underway.

Last season, Jones had 50 receptions for 679 yards and five touchdowns, "but is prone to maddening drops," the paper reports, pointing out that he let "potential touchdown grabs slip through his fingers against" the Miami Dolphins, New York Jets, New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles and Pittsburgh Steelers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on July 19, 2011, 10:05:38 am
Jimmy Mac still living the dolce Vita I see.....I thought he was married?
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/NFL-league-players-lawyers-meet-in-new-york-071811
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on July 19, 2011, 10:32:35 am
Former NFL quarterback Jim McMahon is being treated at a hospital after the limousine he was riding in crashed through a fence south of Reno.


 
FOX Fantasy Football
Create your FOX Fantasy Football league today for free. Live scoring, mock drafts, customizable league and more.
The Nevada Highway Patrol says the accident happened around 2 p.m. Monday on U.S. 395 in Pleasant Valley.

Trooper Mike Edgell says the limo was heading north when it left the four-lane highway, crashed through a fence and into a pasture.

Edgell says McMahon, his traveling companion, Lori Navon, and the limo driver were taken to Renown Regional Medical Center. He described their injuries as ''non-incapacitating.''


Sounds to me like the driver was too busy looking at the rear-view mirror while the passengers were engaging in the world's oldest profession...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 19, 2011, 01:14:20 pm
JJ, I'd rather not have to trust Tice to develop Herman Johnson come training camp and deal with his faults till he does develop sufficiently. You do realize that we havent had any OTAs or contact between coaches and players since March. I dont believe Herman Johnson even logged a minutes time last year. I think he was solely a PS player. With all the OG problems we had and he couldnt get on the field doesnt bode well for having to depend on him to start. We need some road graders for that interior line both to run the ball as well as pass protect. Give me a vet OG please and may he be top notch quality. We need to protect Cutler, not put him on life support. You saw what happened in the NFC championship game, you know that line needs an overhaul. Carimi is just the tip of the iceberg not the final piece to the puzzle

 Trouble is I saw Webb as a bone that Angelo thru to Tice to be cut...instead...he started.

 Thats what I'm HOPING Tice can get out of H.Johnson, Tice must have seen somthing in him.  ::)

 All I'm saying is if we dont get Mankins or Claybo...etc. ,that Tice has a backup plan in place

 that he saw potential in. Agreed that Carimi is the tip of the iceberg, whats under the water is what Tice

 signed and has yet to develop to his standards... I hope.  :o

 
I would say they barely survived more than anything.  If we are willing drop big money on either Mankins or Asom, I would actually rather pick Mankins...assuming we solidify our DT with or without Adams.  If Asom backed up Detroit's line, obviously that would suck.  IMO, it is more important for this team to protect the QB 1st, open up running lanes 2nd.  As bad as the Giants game was, the Jets game was damn fun to watch.  Cutler was able to 5/7 step drop, surveyed the scene and let it rip because of the great protection.  Furthermore, that game also proved that even with star corners that the Jets had, they were burned because they could not pressure Cutler.  The Bears need to pressure the QB especially up the middle.  If that happens, Peanut and company can be adequate for this defense.

 We did draft Paea for just such a mission, must be the game plan I'm thinking Halas Hall wants.

 What is the worry is that Deeeetroit and Packers are talking Asomugha...that cannot happen.

 If it means the checkbook has to comeout then so be it. I hope he signs out of the NFC North.  ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 19, 2011, 01:36:00 pm
I would say they barely survived more than anything.  If we are willing drop big money on either Mankins or Asom, I would actually rather pick Mankins...assuming we solidify our DT with or without Adams.  If Asom backed up Detroit's line, obviously that would suck.  IMO, it is more important for this team to protect the QB 1st, open up running lanes 2nd.  As bad as the Giants game was, the Jets game was damn fun to watch.  Cutler was able to 5/7 step drop, surveyed the scene and let it rip because of the great protection.  Furthermore, that game also proved that even with star corners that the Jets had, they were burned because they could not pressure Cutler.   The Bears need to pressure the QB especially up the middle.  If that happens, Peanut and company can be adequate for this defense.

 Good quote in RED...Tice took chumps and made them an Offensive Line.

 That was more then barely surviving... that was chumps in the NFC Championship.

 Tice did that with junk ... imagine Carimi on board ...

 imagine if he can get out of H.Johnson what he got out of Webb.  ;D

 It's a wait and see.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 19, 2011, 03:57:21 pm
I'm torn as to whether I'd like the HOF Game to go on as scheduled or not.

On the one hand, from a health / long-term point of view, for the Bears to have to play one less preseason game could defnitely be considered a good thing...  especially since we already have to make a grueling cross-Atlantic trip for that regular season game in London.

On the other hand, the Bears need as much work under live fire conditions as they can get -- especially the offense. And, having a game just two weeks away would definitely take the urgency level of an abbreviated training camp up quite a few notches from Lovie's usual casual vibe.

Other thoughts? 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 19, 2011, 04:36:01 pm
The starters would only play a series or two and the scrubs comes in.

Don't have a problem with the HOF game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 19, 2011, 04:59:23 pm

 WE need all the PRESS that we can get ... we are in G.B.'s shadow ...and that sucks.  :'(
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 19, 2011, 06:30:06 pm
There is zero chance that the packers will try to sign Asomugha, jj.

There is plenty of time for the players to get "football ready". The players who had their own training camps wasted their time and energy, IMHO
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 19, 2011, 06:37:20 pm
QB's throwing to receivers is never a waste of time.  It builds chemistry and team work.  They learn tendency's and the QB and WR can communicate to each other on such and such route if the defender is here go there and that type of thing.

The Packers blew it by not bothering with it.  It shows me they are like a fat bloated tick and are content to sit on their laurels because they are a young team with a Super Bowl ring.  We shall see how it works out for them this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 19, 2011, 06:41:10 pm
I expect that the GB QB/WRs have had penty of time together to be in sync.  Too much playing time can cause boredom to set in.  There should be plenty of enthusiasm next week.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 19, 2011, 06:59:24 pm
We will see but I have a suspicion that a young team that is full of themselves and no offseason will not be very good this year.  They have the talent but the drive and passion?  I am not so sure.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 19, 2011, 09:45:46 pm
On the other hand, the Bears need as much work under live fire conditions as they can get -- especially the offense. And, having a game just two weeks away would definitely take the urgency level of an abbreviated training camp up quite a few notches from Lovie's usual casual vibe.

Other thoughts? 

Yeah, hamstring-gate 2004. 

At least we are into year 2 of Mad Mike as OC.  Assuming some offensive balance is emphasized, continuity will be an asset this upcoming season.  The Tampa 2 defensive system is set.  But there will potentially be a lot of new faces that may be in contention for starting jobs depending on what happens with FAs in house and league wide.  Obviously they would need to get up to speed quickly.  The OL needed a TON of reps in OTAs and other informal supervised workouts under Tice.  That will be missed for sure.

Irregardless, the odds are pretty stacked against prolonging the great fortune the Bears enjoyed injury wise last year.  The vets ain't getting any younger.  Either the extra time off helped the recovery process from last season.  Or the sudden headfirst dive into training camp may create the abnormal spike in injuries that fans have feared.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 19, 2011, 09:53:17 pm
I suspect the vets will be fine or better off then they normally would be.  It will be the younger guys who do not know how to prepare for a season on their own who will end up being more likely to be injured imo.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 20, 2011, 01:24:39 pm
imagine if he can get out of H.Johnson what he got out of Webb.

JJ, I guess then that means you are willing to give Tice say 5 or 6 games like last year to get something out of Big Herman? See I am not willing to gam-ble from the beginning. I want to start the season with a veteran line set to kick butt. I dont want a repeat of last year
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 20, 2011, 01:34:04 pm
Guys like Herman Johnson are the ones that really got shafted by this lockout. He could really have used those OTAs to get up to speed on Tice's blocking schemes and the Martz offense in general.   

Plus you've got to figure guys as big as he is have a hell of a time staying in shape under the best of circumstances...  but left to their own devices during a prolonged offseason?  Wouldn't surprise me in the least if Big Herm was tipping the scales at over 4 bills right now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 20, 2011, 02:52:00 pm
Guys like Herman Johnson are the ones that really got shafted by this lockout. He could really have used those OTAs to get up to speed on Tice's blocking schemes and the Martz offense in general.   

Plus you've got to figure guys as big as he is have a hell of a time staying in shape under the best of circumstances...  but left to their own devices during a prolonged offseason?  Wouldn't surprise me in the least if Big Herm was tipping the scales at over 4 bills right now.

Exactly. No OTAs, no training or contact by the coaches. Laying up and taking life easy, drinking like a fish. Yup, I can see it all.

Ya year that JJ?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 20, 2011, 03:24:36 pm
imagine if he can get out of H.Johnson what he got out of Webb.

JJ, I guess then that means you are willing to give Tice say 5 or 6 games like last year to get something out of Big Herman? See I am not willing to gam-ble from the beginning. I want to start the season with a veteran line set to kick butt. I dont want a repeat of last year

 Agreed.

 
Guys like Herman Johnson are the ones that really got shafted by this lockout. He could really have used those OTAs to get up to speed on Tice's blocking schemes and the Martz offense in general.   

Plus you've got to figure guys as big as he is have a hell of a time staying in shape under the best of circumstances...  but left to their own devices during a prolonged offseason?  Wouldn't surprise me in the least if Big Herm was tipping the scales at over 4 bills right now.

 I cant speculate because I along with you dont know whats going on.

 
Exactly. No OTAs, no training or contact by the coaches. Laying up and taking life easy, drinking like a fish. Yup, I can see it all.

Ya year that JJ?

 I hear it but I havent seen a training camp.

 I know as much about this as you do.

 Which between virtually all of us as fans of every team is ... nothing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 20, 2011, 03:32:33 pm

 The way I'm hearing is once this SHIIIIIT is settled...its gonna be a bloodbath of checkbooks.

 Totally insane and somthing the likes of which we will never see again.

 Sam Bradford has to be one happy motherfuuucker.  :D He is the last.  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 20, 2011, 03:38:03 pm
JJ, there is nothing going on, there are no OTAs. There has been no contact football since January. How is big Herman going to get better between January and July? And lest you forget he didnt log any time last year on the Oline. He was strictly on the practice squad as I remember it.

Why would you assume there is something going on?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 20, 2011, 03:49:50 pm
I cant speak for youze guys here but I have been on pins and needles anxiously awaiting on some kind of settlement on this new CBA. Every day I think there is going to be agreement. Like the players reps are there in Washington to ratify any agreement and the owners are supposed to be at a meeting in Atlanta tomorrow.

So lets get it over with. Lets play football.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 20, 2011, 04:02:06 pm
JJ, there is nothing going on, there are no OTAs. There has been no contact football since January. How is big Herman going to get better between January and July? And lest you forget he didnt log any time last year on the Oline. He was strictly on the practice squad as I remember it.

Why would you assume there is something going on?

 Because WEBB was a throw a way 7th round pick ... he sucked ... and should have been cut ...

 except ... TICE made him a STARTER ... and then ... the NFC Championship.

 On the very Offensive Line that anybody has to admit ... IMPROVED.

 Thats what I'm hoping Tice sees in who he signed ... H.Johnson ... or anybody else.

 Tice can work magic with garbage ... I say lets give this thing a chance to play out.

 Does anybody remember CEDRIC BENSEN ? Guy was a total bust on DAA BEAARRSSE.

 We cut him and he never played in football again ... last I heard he was in some Mexican semi-pro team.

 You believe me dont you? Why would you doubt what I said about talent?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 20, 2011, 04:11:47 pm
Benson has been a star RB for the Bengals
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 20, 2011, 05:03:28 pm
The way I'm hearing is once this SHIIIIIT is settled...its gonna be a bloodbath of checkbooks.

 Totally insane and somthing the likes of which we will never see again.


JJ, I am waiting for this Brady anti-trust suit to be settled. I am watching to see whether Mankins gets free agency. As for the free agent signings I sure hope the Bears go after Mankins. We need that dude badly.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on July 20, 2011, 05:29:53 pm
Supposedly everything was settled yesterday with the players to vote to ratify today and the owners tomorrow.

Now I hear Demaurice Smith  says he is uncomfortable with some details and may not present it to the players yet.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 20, 2011, 05:50:22 pm
It was proposed to the players but not the entire thing they claim it was to much to digest in one day. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 20, 2011, 06:55:53 pm
I am very anxious to see the start of drafting previously undrafted college players.  That can be very importaant.  GB got two starters from the undrafted player pool last season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 21, 2011, 07:29:09 am
As for the free agent signings I sure hope the Bears go after Mankins. We need that dude badly.

Last I saw, and unless the new CBA radically alters the compensation rules for FA signings, Mankins would cost us 2 first round draft picks. Mankins is a great player at a position of great need, but that's too much to give up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on July 21, 2011, 10:15:03 am
I think given Cutler's beatings last year I'm the Bears and given Angleo's drafting skills, two is just fine.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 21, 2011, 10:28:44 am
Article about 16 veteran defensive players who could be cut loose:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/21/16-defenders-who-could-be-cut-before-the-season/

Of particular interest:

Okoye, DT, Titans - The small, quick DT that LoviNelli love. Was badly overdrafted as a Top 10 pick but is still a good player with upside (and only 24). If we hadn't drafted Paea this kid could be a solid pick-up but now I think he would kind of be redundant unless we don't resign Anthony Adams for whatever reason.

Brian Dawkins, S, Broncos - Are his best days behind him? Definitely. Could we use his attitude and veteran leadership in the D-Backfield? Even more so.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 21, 2011, 11:55:59 am
Last I saw, and unless the new CBA radically alters the compensation rules for FA signings, Mankins would cost us 2 first round draft picks. Mankins is a great player at a position of great need, but that's too much to give up.

I have to agree 2 is too much, normally I would agree. OTOH the overwhelming need makes me think maybe we need to rethink that position. The thing about Mankins is if the players win the Brady case and they receive free agent status as a plum then he wouldnt cost the Bears the 2 #1s, which is why I have been trying to find news about the court case.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 21, 2011, 01:55:41 pm
imagine if he can get out of H.Johnson what he got out of Webb.

JJ, I guess then that means you are willing to give Tice say 5 or 6 games like last year to get something out of Big Herman? See I am not willing to gam-ble from the beginning. I want to start the season with a veteran line set to kick butt. I dont want a repeat of last year

I think the very best possible hope for the Bears is to have a repeat of last year.  Get into the playoffs and hope to get lucky.

The Packers are clearly a better team than the Bears.  We can hop for injuries to level the playing field a bit, but I can't look at our players, compared to theirs, and have a reasonable hope that we have the better team.  And one more big guy on the line won't turn the tables.  It would improve us, but not by the quantum leap that we would need.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 21, 2011, 02:18:06 pm
Success for the Bears in 2012 is going to be all about the passing game.

If we can't throw the ball much better this year than we did last year -- and do it consistently -- we certainly can't hope to have a better season than last year and it may be far worse.

The onus is squarely on Martz, Cutler, Olsen and our WRs to step up and make it happen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 21, 2011, 03:45:12 pm
I think the very best possible hope for the Bears is to have a repeat of last year.  Get into the playoffs and hope to get lucky.

The Packers are clearly a better team than the Bears.  We can hop for injuries to level the playing field a bit, but I can't look at our players, compared to theirs, and have a reasonable hope that we have the better team.  And one more big guy on the line won't turn the tables.  It would improve us, but not by the quantum leap that we would need.

Well we shall just beg to differ because I believe where we can make the biggest improvement is on the OLine. We won the division kinda by default last year. That wont happen this year without major improvement. The best way to be succesful in 2011 is ro have a kick butt Oline
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 21, 2011, 04:03:21 pm
I agree that an improvement on the OL would be very useful, although I think we could also get great value out of imporvement on the DL.  However, I don't that bringing a single player, no matter how good that player, is going to raise our talent level high enough to equal that of the Packers.

I hope we improve the OL.  I hope we improve the DL.  I just think we are also going to have substantial luck in order to compete, over the entire season, with the Packer.

A season ending injury to Rogers would be a great start.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 21, 2011, 04:29:22 pm
All well and good regarding the OL and DL...  and improvements, presumably, have been made on both units via April's draft...  but the single biggest reason our season ended the way it did was because we could not complete passes against the Packers' D.

The guy throwing the ball, the guys catching the ball and the guy calling the plays are all the same as they were last year...  that's why I said they're the ones who have to step it up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on July 21, 2011, 04:40:16 pm
Giving the guy throwing the ball some protection should improve all those things
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 21, 2011, 04:59:06 pm
The Packers are not all that.  They are a young talented team but they are not light years ahead of any team in the NFL.  Plus they are completely full of themselves and are quite content with their Super Bowl win.  I see complacency setting in.

They did not bother to get together for one player practice.  Not one.  They said they were good to go and that it was a waste of time.

Young team, big heads, complacent, no offseason, no contact with the coaches...

I am thinking they may not even make the play offs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 21, 2011, 05:13:09 pm
Living in Wisconsin, I would love that.

But barring major injuries, they will do so.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 21, 2011, 06:58:02 pm
I think that you hit it, dave.  The Bears need another season with no major injuries.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 21, 2011, 07:02:04 pm
Posted by Michael David Smith on July 21, 2011, 7:23 PM EDT
 
AP
The NFL has canceled the Hall of Fame Game, as the annual preseason opener has become the biggest casualty to date of the lockout.
 
“We are unfortunately going to have to cancel the Hall of Fame Game this year,” NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said at the owners’ meeting in Atlanta. “The time is just too short and we feel that it’s important for all 32 teams to be operating with the same number of preseason games and also starting camp at the same date or near the same date.”
 
The Hall of Fame Game was supposed to take place on August 7, with the Bears meeting the Rams in Canton, Ohio.
 
Goodell noted that the Pro Football Hall of Fame induction ceremony will take place as scheduled.
 
“Of course, the ceremonies will go on,” Goodell said.
 
But not the game that was supposed to go with it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on July 21, 2011, 07:20:55 pm
The Packersare Super Bowl Champions and still young and have several quality veterans back from injury...it see what????
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 21, 2011, 08:17:17 pm
Giving the guy throwing the ball some protection should improve all those things

Amen! Thats where I am coming from, just like improving the pass rush improves the secondary too
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 21, 2011, 08:49:17 pm
There is no doubt that pass protection will improve all those things.

But in and of themselves, they are not enough to bring us up to a par with the Packers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 21, 2011, 09:06:25 pm
There is no doubt that pass protection will improve all those things.

But in and of themselves, they are not enough to bring us up to a par with the Packers.

You are aware that Phill 23 accused me of being a Packer fan for saying the Packers were a better team than the Bears after the NFC Championship game arent you? And he is always lurking. But I disagree with your opinion that were the Bears to improve both their offensive and defensive lines that they arent as good as the Packers. I think they will matchup just fine provided they improve both lines (more than they already have to date).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 21, 2011, 09:15:19 pm
If the Bears improve the O-line they will be fine.  IMO they have already improved the D-line by cutting Harris and adding Paea.

I suspect the Bears will win the division again after that who knows.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 21, 2011, 09:17:24 pm
Phil can accuse me of anything he wishes.  I still will express my opinion.

The Bears are a good team.  Much better than average.  Not not among the top 3 or 4 in the NFL.  If you add one offensive lineman and one defensive lineman, they will still not be one of the top 3 or 4 teams in the NFL.  Much closer, but not at the top.

Doesn't mean they can't win it.  But they will need a lot of luck to do so.  Either good luck for them or bad luck for the others.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 22, 2011, 06:29:45 am
Good to be talking a little Bears and Packers after a long while.  Each game played last year between the two teams was close and could have gone either way.  I agree with Pekin, I don't see the huge gulf between these two teams.  It is hard to say which teams are the top 3 or 4 in my opinion.  All teams on paper are a little easier to rank based on past performance, but who's to say who will get nicked like Polomaleau, or Brady blows out his ACL, or one team has a run of injuries along its offensive line?  When does Ray Lewis meet Father Time and see his skills diminish before our eyes.

Each season is a marathon, the best team in games 1 - 4 is replace by the best team in games 5 - 8, and the beat goes on.  The Packers were the best team in games 15 and beyond, we played them twice, lost twice, and were in position to have won twice.  Maybe that is where luck comes in...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 22, 2011, 07:39:41 am
The Bears are a good team.  Much better than average.  Not not among the top 3 or 4 in the NFL.  If you add one offensive lineman and one defensive lineman, they will still not be one of the top 3 or 4 teams in the NFL.  Much closer, but not at the top.

Agreed 100%. I believe we are still a go-to WR away from being a legitimate SuperBowl contender.  And possibly an OC and O-Lineman away as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 22, 2011, 07:44:14 am
As for the HOF game, IMO, no great loss.

It would be insanity to put the Rams and Bears on the field with this little prep time and expect anything close to a quality product even my preseason standards.

I do feel bad for the city of Canton though. They are gonna lose a sh*tload of revenue from this decision.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 22, 2011, 08:23:44 am
I am not sure this deal is a finished product. The owners voted on the issues they had and basically said here is your CBA take it or leave it. Nothing was done about the Brady case or other litigation.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 22, 2011, 08:52:26 am
The veteran players that hate sweating through training camp have got to love the way this is playing out.

OTOH the players that want to get better, actually win some games and have a chance of surviving the whole season without major injury, have to be hoping this thing gets done ASAP.  And this year's rookies are totally getting the shaft.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on July 22, 2011, 09:11:26 am
I prefer the owners suffer at least one lost season - see how agreeable they are in 2012...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on July 22, 2011, 09:17:56 am
Bring on the replacement players
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 22, 2011, 09:20:48 am
If I had my way, none of the owners and none of the players would see a dime of income from football this year.

I would gladly give up a season of NFL football to see that happen, and it would be a small penalty indeed for everything they've put the fans through and all the income they've already cost everyone who depends on a full NFL season to feed their families.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 22, 2011, 09:35:02 am
To my knowledge nothing was done about the ability of teams to franchise players (continually)  which is a restriction of free agency. This is the crux of the Brady case, which affects Mankins and Jackson.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on July 22, 2011, 10:31:31 am
How could God allow the Cahboys to not play football on his day off?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 22, 2011, 10:33:56 am
How could God allow the Cahboys to not play football on his day off?

Maybe He wants us doing other things on Sundays than watching football all day.  Just a thought... from someone who is guilty as charged.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 22, 2011, 10:42:29 am
Maybe He wants us doing other things on Sundays than watching football all day.  Just a thought... from someone who is guilty as charged.

Very likely. Ding, Ding, Ding!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 22, 2011, 11:36:46 am
I am disappointed in the comments of a few players who critcize the owners for "tricking them'.  What?  They had De Maurice Smith and his staff there to look out for their interests.  Are they saying that that staff is incompetent and was tricked?

Fortunately, I believe that most of the players will not buy that manure and over 50% will vote for the contract.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 22, 2011, 11:38:27 am
Bring on the replacement players

Agree!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 22, 2011, 12:00:58 pm
I am not interested in seeing replacement players.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on July 22, 2011, 12:45:12 pm
Keanu Reeves may be available
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 22, 2011, 02:29:19 pm
So we are going Hollywood huh?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on July 22, 2011, 02:39:53 pm
Jimmy McGinty: Falco, it's nasty out there.
Shane Falco: That's why girls don't play the game, coach.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 22, 2011, 03:48:17 pm
Dont forget Adam Sandler.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 22, 2011, 04:02:30 pm
Jamie Foxx drops back while Al Pacino prowls the sidelines.  Throws it to the corner of the endzone to Cuba Gooding Jr...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 22, 2011, 04:28:24 pm

 Lets not forget that the days of SAM BRADFORD and JE'MARCUS RUSSELL appear to be over.

 At least it seems to be a major push in negotiations ... we dont know yet.

 The big paydays hated by veteran players and owners alike,

 may be a thing of the past when it comes to first round draftees.

 So suddenly ... 2 first rounders for Mankins could be in the realm of possibility ... on the other hand,

 why trade two first rounders for Mankins if you see somthing better in the pipeline,

 for two years in a row that would make Mankins look average?

 And could be gotten for alot cheaper in the future?

 It looks like ...

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWtIvoub6XU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWtIvoub6XU)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 22, 2011, 04:34:48 pm
Steve Smith (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-harris-makes-pitch-for-panthers-smith-20110722,0,2449489.story) for a third anyone?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 22, 2011, 04:37:51 pm
I'd do it!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 22, 2011, 04:51:59 pm
Steve Smith (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-harris-makes-pitch-for-panthers-smith-20110722,0,2449489.story) for a third anyone?

 Lets bring ALL as many WR's into camp as we can and let Cutler see what he needs.

 Theres only about 10 thousand F.A. WR's floating around.

 Anyone remember when he killed us? He burned Peanut in a one on one.

 Thats good enough for me ... if he still has the skills. IF.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on July 22, 2011, 05:31:40 pm
I'd like to thank the bears GM for drafting another good against the run DB, because everyone knows stopping the run without cover skills is a winning idea.

Thanks Jerry....from a Packer Fan.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 22, 2011, 05:52:44 pm
I'd like to thank the bears GM for drafting another good against the run DB, because everyone knows stopping the run without cover skills is a winning idea.

Thanks Jerry....from a Packer Fan.

 We'll get you.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 22, 2011, 09:11:49 pm
(http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w37/Grizzlybear34/Otto.jpg)

Who likes mittens?

RIP  ACL...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on July 22, 2011, 10:05:02 pm
A good day with the guy and they're deer skin mittens....sheesh.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 23, 2011, 04:03:02 pm


Phil - Are you talking about going to the exhibition game when the Bears arrive?  Asuuming they arrive and all.  I might attend also, kind of up in the air right now, but if the price is right, I may just go.

Yep, that's the game I'm talking about.  Me and the family are planning on going IF the season starts.    Looking forward to it!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 23, 2011, 09:14:51 pm
Definitely looks brighter for football according to ESPN
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 24, 2011, 02:13:22 am
Deer Mittens are still mittens.  No grown man should ever where mittens unless the temperature is 40 below.

Plus you have a huggy on your beer.  Is it cold or not?  If it is cold enough to wear mittens then I am thinking you don't need the beer huggy.  Am I wrong?

Your choices in apparell mesh with your political ideals.  Nothing makes sense.
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 24, 2011, 06:06:04 am
I don't think I've ever walked into a store thinking, "where are the mittens?... they've got to be around here, maybe on an end cap?"  also real hard to make a good snowball with mittens, but good for smoothing the ol' igloo.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 24, 2011, 09:04:22 am
Deerskin should be fairly warm especially if they are lined, good for those cold Green Bay games at Lamblow
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 24, 2011, 09:41:29 am
I don't think I've ever walked into a store thinking, "where are the mittens?... they've got to be around here, maybe on an end cap?"  also real hard to make a good snowball with mittens, but good for smoothing the ol' igloo.

Why would anybody living in Texas or wherever you happen to live need mittens? But up north you need protection against frostbite
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 24, 2011, 11:11:55 am
I agree, if it's cold enough for the mittens, what's up with the hugger?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on July 24, 2011, 01:13:04 pm
Deer Mittens are still mittens.  No grown man should ever where mittens unless the temperature is 40 below.

Plus you have a huggy on your beer.  Is it cold or not?  If it is cold enough to wear mittens then I am thinking you don't need the beer huggy.  Am I wrong?





Hey, cut Otto some slack. At least he didn't have strings attached to keep from losing them

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 24, 2011, 01:26:50 pm



Hey, cut Otto some slack. At least he didn't have strings attached to keep from losing them
 

 I remember those little elastic clips our mothers would put on our gloves from the first grade!

 The minute you got on the school bus out of eyesight of mom you took them off and lost them.

 But you came home with the gloves.  ;D

 I think most moms figured : hey you know what ... thats all we wanted.

 At least my mom didnt dress me up like a "tic about to pop" from "A Christmas Story".  :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 24, 2011, 01:44:04 pm
 Does anybody remember jumping thru ice puddles while waiting for the school bus?

 Your shoes got wet and you found out what COLD was? You only did that once.

 You sat in class the whole day waiting for your shoes and socks to dry out.

 You got home and the OL MAN said : WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO YOUR SHOES??

 Your shoes were now bent into all sorts of dried out states.

 So you told him how you slipped and fell into the ditch while waiting for the bus.

 You knew you could only play that one off him ONE TIME.  ::)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on July 24, 2011, 10:41:15 pm
Still hard to believe AC's gone....too young...way too young.

Looks like Cutler cut off his girlfriend,Cavalari,practically at the altar. Still don't like the guy....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 25, 2011, 05:57:19 am
I'm in Tennessee, not Texas...  Just givin' Otto a hard time, but still wouldn't own mittens.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 25, 2011, 07:04:19 am
Lets get off the mitten crap and talk football. Again, its looking like the union is going to ratify this CBA. Expect movement today and possibly players report soon. Free Agency will be upon us quickly
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 25, 2011, 07:07:54 am
waiting for the school bus?


School bus?, Hell, I had to walk to school. Ah yes, how I remember those nice Illinois Winter morning's, Blah! My sox got wet alright, it was due to the snow coming over the top of my boots..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 25, 2011, 08:32:52 am
Analysis: It’s all on the line now for Bears (http://www.nwherald.com/2011/07/24/analysis-its-all-on-the-line-now-for-bears/aj1i8gi/)

This year, Angelo should open his wallet to improve the Bears’ offensive line.  By now, Bears fans might know the dreadful statistics from 2010 by heart. The Bears allowed 56 sacks last season for the worst mark in the NFL.  Bears quarterback Jay Cutler absorbed 52 of those sacks, including nine in Week 4 against the New York Giants. He sustained a concussion in that game and sat out the following week.  By comparison, division rivals Green Bay (38 sacks allowed), Minnesota (36 sacks allowed) and Detroit (27 sacks allowed) each did a far better job of protecting their quarterbacks.  The lack of protection caused the Bears to curtail their game plan on offense.  Offensive coordinator Mike Martz called for fewer passes and more runs, but the team’s conservative approach also faltered as the Bears finished No. 30 out of 32 teams in total offense.  Most of the Bears’ offensive line is set to return, but that shouldn’t prevent Angelo from searching for upgrades. The Bears reportedly are about $37 million below next season’s projected salary cap of $120 million, which should give them room for at least a couple of big-money moves.  Here is a temperature check on some offensive linemen the Bears could pursue.

HOT
Olin Kreutz, C, Chicago
After a long lockout, Kreutz is a must sign. He should have two or three good seasons left in him, and a rookie lineman such as Gabe Carimi could learn valuable lessons from the fiery veteran.

Davin Joseph, G, Tampa Bay
Joseph, 27, is exactly the type of run blocker who could deliver big gains and big games for Matt Forte. Regardless of Cutler’s arm strength, the Bears will sputter without a reliable ground game.

MILD
Tyson Clabo, T, Atlanta
Clabo is one of the meanest, most effective tackles on the market. He could start on the left or right side for the Bears, but they would have to compete against many other teams to sign him.

Harvey Dahl, G, Atlanta
Dahl, 30, will be one of the most coveted guards on the free agent market and likely will require a bigger contract than Joseph. Although Dahl might be expensive, he’s also a safe bet to produce.

Marshal Yanda, G, Baltimore
Yanda, who will not turn 27 years old until September, also could draw interest from several suitors. Could the Bears lure the 6-foot-3, 315 pound Iowa native back to the Midwest with the right offer?

Daryn Colledge, G, Green Bay
Colledge, 29, could serve as a versatile veteran in case teammates such as Kreutz or Roberto Garza go down. Besides, having a player who knows Green Bay’s playbook wouldn’t hurt.

COOL
Carl Nicks, G, New Orleans
Nicks likely will return to the Saints, who extended a tender offer to him before the lockout. Yet his name should be included on any list of top free agent offensive linemen.

Ryan Harris, T, Denver
Harris was teammates with Cutler in 2007 and 2008. He could play tackle for the right price, but some reports have indicated ex-Broncos coach Mike Shanahan might want him on the Redskins.

Kyle Kosier, G, Dallas
The Cowboys are over the salary cap, which could make a starter such as Kosier available. Similarly, Cowboys tackle Doug Free (an NIU alum) could command big money on the open market.

Current depth chart (http://www.chicagotribune.com/site/newspaper/sports/ct-spt-0724-depth-chart-pompei-bears-20110724,0,7082179.htmlstory)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on July 25, 2011, 09:42:43 am
pretty simple- Bears have the money, sign whoever the phuck will get a SB win for Chicago. End of conversation.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 25, 2011, 11:23:23 am
Woot!  Lock out is over!

Teams can start signing their own free agents and draft picks tomorrow and it looks like Friday free agency will begin.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on July 25, 2011, 11:29:23 am
After what Robbie Gould said about Virginia McCaskey during the negotiations I sure would like to be a fly on the wall the next time they see each other although I doubt that Virginia goes to Halas Hall much.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 25, 2011, 11:47:44 am
Anybody hear anything about the franchise tag crap? Is Mankins free to sign with anybody without having to pay 2 1sts?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 25, 2011, 12:47:18 pm
From the Boston Herald (http://news.bostonherald.com/sports/football/patriots/view.bg?articleid=1353926)

Mankins was hoping to gain his freedom from the tag along with unfettered free agency as part of the settlement with the nine other plaintiffs in the Brady v. NFL case, but that didn’t happen.  As for what transpires from here, it’s hard to tell. The Pats have to be prepared for Mankins to hold out throughout training camp. Technically, he doesn’t have to sign the franchise tag until 26 days after the new CBA is ratified. The Pats also have to be ready in case he opts to sit the whole year.

Sources: Bears interested in Brad Smith (http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/6799869/chicago-bears-interested-brad-smith-new-york-jets)

The Chicago Bears won't be major players in free agency when it comes to the top-tier receivers on the market, but sources say the team has a legitimate interest in New York Jets receiver Brad Smith.  A fourth-round pick in 2006 and former quarterback at Missouri, Smith caught just four passes last season for 44 yards with no touchdowns, and rushed for 299 yards on 38 attempts. Those numbers might not immediately resonate, but it's likely the Bears are drawn to Smith's 6-foot-2, 212-pound frame, versatility and the fact he represents an explosive value option who could take some of the attention off playmakers such as Devin Hester and Matt Forte.  Throughout his five-year career, Smith has contributed at several positions on offense and in the return game. In addition to catching 64 passes over his career, he's averaged 7.8 yards per carry (98 attempts) and completed four-of-seven passes for 51 yards and a touchdown.  As a return man, Smith has averaged 26.6 yards on 74 kickoff returns.

Source: Bears, Olin Kreutz to talk (http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/6799749/chicago-bears-plan-talk-olin-kreutz-camp-asap)

Step 1 in bringing the Chicago Bears' offensive line to respectability will kick off with the team beginning serious negotiations with free agent center Olin Kreutz on a new contract as soon as the new CBA is ratified, according to an NFL source.  Because lockout rules prevented contact between teams and the players, the Bears presumably hadn't engaged in any talks with Kreutz.  In the past, Kreutz declined more lucrative offers to remain with the Bears and has stated a desire to return in 2011. At the same time, Kreutz is seeking a respectable market value offer that might allow him to retire with the club, according to sources.  It's expected that teams won't receive an exclusive period from the league to sign their own free agents. That means the Bears must work quickly strike a deal with Kreutz, who is sure to have other suitors, in part because of the market conditions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 25, 2011, 01:43:26 pm
Mankins was hoping to gain his freedom from the tag along with unfettered free agency as part of the settlement with the nine other plaintiffs in the Brady v. NFL case, but that didn’t happen.  As for what transpires from here, it’s hard to tell. The Pats have to be prepared for Mankins to hold out throughout training camp. Technically, he doesn’t have to sign the franchise tag until 26 days after the new CBA is ratified. The Pats also have to be ready in case he opts to sit the whole year.

That sucks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 25, 2011, 04:12:23 pm
Also missing off that Bears FA wish list is Anthony Adams.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 25, 2011, 04:15:43 pm
The lockout is over The doors open tomorrow. Tomorrow the Bears can sign their draft picks, sign undrafted FAs, negotiate with ALL FAs, theirs and everybody elses. Camp opens Friday in Bourbonais. Lets go Bears.

Are you ready for some football?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 25, 2011, 05:46:52 pm
Brad Maynard he no more. Bears tell him bye bye
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 25, 2011, 06:49:46 pm
Are you ready for some football?

Yes!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 26, 2011, 07:19:53 am
Maynard was decent, problem was, he always had problems when we played the bigger games..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 08:29:40 am
Maynard was last in the league in punting average. Time for a change
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 08:57:12 am
Just keep in mind that Maynard was Robbie Gould's holder for many seasons.

There will definitely be an adjustment period in that respect. Especially with the greatly shortened preseason, FG attempts at least in the early season could be a bit adventerous. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 09:01:11 am
Bears land wave of undrafted free agents
     
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune staff reporter
 
1:36 a.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

In the fast-paced post-lockout era, the NFL changed the rules on the fly for NFL clubs late Monday afternoon.

Originally, teams were not supposed to contact draft picks and undrafted free agents until 9 a.m. Tuesday to begin negotiations. But the league -- likely knowing the wild tampering that would take place anyway -- gave clubs the green light to begin negotiations with those players while restricting them from signing contracts until the original time.

ESPN (tv network) That set off a wave of business around the league as teams looked to get as much work out of the way as possible in advance of the 9 a.m. Tuesday starting time for negotiating deals with veteran free agents. The Bears were not left out in the cold and look to have secured at least 10 players to this point on a list that could easily reach 20 as the Bears look to reach the 90-man roster limit.

According to a variety of sources, the Bears have reached agreements with defensive backs Winston Venable (Boise State), Anthony Walters (Delaware) and Mike Holmes (Syracuse), center J.C. Brignone (Mississippi State), guard Ricky Henry (Nebraska) and defensive tackle Corbin Bryant (Northwestern).

ESPN Chicago reports the Bears also have reached terms with center Alex Linnenkohl (Oregon State), tight end Andre Smith (Virginia Tech), safety Dom DeCicco (Pitt) and linebacker Mario Addison (Troy).

The players cannot officially sign contracts until 9 a.m. By then, the Bears should be off and running in veteran free agency. They can negotiate but will be prevented from signing veteran free agents until 5 p.m. Friday, the eve of the team's first practice at Olivet Nazarene University in Bourbonnais, Ill.

Check back for more undrafted free agents throughout the day.

bmbiggs@tribune.com Twitter @BradBiggs
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 09:04:30 am
Wasnt that Oregon State center high on our list right after the draft?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 09:15:40 am
Bears make cornerback a priority in signing of undrafted free agents
   
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
9:00 a.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

The list of undrafted free agents the Chicago Bears are compiling continues to grow as the team has knocked out nearly all of that work in preparation for the negotiation period with veteran free agents that began at 9 a.m.

While the Bears didn’t draft a cornerback in April, they have made the position a priority with undrafted free agents and two talented corners are on their way to Halas Hall on Tuesday to sign contracts. Baylor’s Antareis Bryan and Northwest Missouri State’s Ryan Jones have made verbal agreements, according to sources.

Both players are ones the Bears showed significant pre-draft interest in. Jones came to Halas Hall on a pre-draft visit and area scout Teddy Monago was at his pro day and at the Missouri pro day which Jones attended. Bryan was tracked carefully by area scout Chris Ballard and coach Lovie Smith called him during the draft to make sure he knew the team wanted to add him to the mix.

Bryan, on his way to the airport in Texas, said the Cover Two experience he gained in college made it an easy choice for him.

“I think this is an opportunity that fits me well,” Bryan said. “Every man’s dream is to be drafted and I am viewing this as a stepping stone.”

Bryan has good size at 6-1, 195 pounds, and he has been clocked in the 40-yard dash in sub 4.4 time. With a 40-inch vertical jump, he has all the athletic skill you would look for in a cornerback. A hamstring injury during his senior season and a broken ankle as a junior impacted his draft status. Bryan’s agent Albert Elias fielded calls from four teams interested in signing Bryan still this morning, but they chose the Bears with the belief Bryan can win a job on special teams and work his way into the depth chart at cornerback.

Jones also has good size at 5-11, 198 pounds, and he ran a 4.46 40-yard dash at the Missouri pro day. He was on many snub lists right after the draft and agent Greg Linton said they chose the Bears from nine offers. It wasn’t based on money – teams have a pool of $75,000 from which to pay undrafted players signing bonuses – but opportunity.

“They were always there throughout the entire process,” Linton said. “They showed the most interest from Day 1.”

Here is an unofficial list of other players who will sign with the Bears as undrafted free agents:

WR Jimmy Young, TCU

DB Winston Venable, Boise State

DB Anthony Walters, Delaware

DB/KR Mike Holmes, Syracuse

C J.C. Brignone, Mississippi State

G Ricky Henry, Nebraska

DT Corbin Bryant, Northwestern

C Alex Linnenkohl, Oregon State

TE Andre Smith, Virginia Tech

S Dom DeCicco, Pitt

LB Mario Addison, Troy

bmbiggs@tribune.com

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 09:37:26 am
Time for Bears to protect Jay Cutler’s blind side

NEIL HAYES ON THE BEARS July 25, 2011 11:00PM

Jerry Angelo acknowledged that the offensive line was the team’s biggest question mark entering last season.

Guess what? The same is true now that the lockout is over and the Bears are packing for training camp. That’s why center Olin Kreutz and defensive tackle Anthony Adams shouldn’t be the first people the Bears’ general manager calls when teams are allowed to contact free agents today.

As important as it is to re-sign them, the top priority is filling the hole at left tackle. The top three free agents available at the position are Matt Light, Jammal Brown or Doug Free.

The plan is for J’Marcus Webb to start camp at left tackle, with rookie Gabe Carimi at right tackle.

Since Carimi played left tackle at Wisconsin and Webb started 12 games at right tackle as a rookie last season, keeping them in the spots they played last year also makes sense. But many believe Webb would be more able to matchup against elite pass rushers on the left side because he’s more athletic.

Chris Williams and Frank Omiyale are expected to compete at left guard, with the loser likely becoming the backup at both tackle spots.

What that means is, one season after leading the league with 56 sacks allowed, the Bears are betting on a rookie and a second-year player drafted in the seventh round.

It’s difficult enough for a rookie to win a starting job in camp during a normal year, but it will be that much harder for Carimi without the benefit of minicamps and organized team activities. Webb might have benefitted the most from spending the offseason with offensive line coach Mike Tice as he makes the transition to the left side.

As if counting on two players to play positions they have never played before in the NFL isn’t reason enough for an upgrade, consider this: Tice doesn’t know what kind of shape any of the aforementioned left tackle candidates will be in when they report to camp. No one is accusing them of loafing this offseason, but it’s a concern until proven otherwise.

Light would be the ideal candidate. He has protected Tom Brady’s blind side for a decade and could do the same for Jay Cutler while Webb and Carimi compete at right tackle. The Patriots likely will part with the three-time Pro Bowl player after using a first-round pick on Colorado tackle Nate Solder. Known for his leadership, Light, 33, would be perfect to help Kreutz lead the line while serving as a mentor for the two young tackles of the future.

Brown, who played with the Redskins last year, has had injury issues in recent years, but he’s a two-time Pro Bowl selection with experience on the left side. The Cowboys are expected to make re-signing Free a priority. If not, the former Northern Illinois standout is another worthy candidate.

If the Bears can’t land Light, Brown or Free, free agents such as the Broncos’ Ryan Harris and the 49ers’ Barry Simms would provide more depth than the Bears have.

The Bears will play solid defense and special teams. The key to the season is improving an offense that finished 30th in yards and 21st in points last season. Upgrading the offensive line is the best way to improve the unit, and left tackle is the most important position on the line.

Toss in that NFC North foes are loaded with quality defensive linemen, and Angelo can’t afford to ignore the position in free agency for a second consecutive year. Amen
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 09:43:10 am
BEARS
FREE AGENTS

DT Anthony Adams: Solid player and locker-room favorite who wants to return to the Bears.

S Josh Bullocks: Didn’t challenge for starting spot in 2010.

TE Desmond Clark: No reason to come back after being inactive for all but five games.

QB Todd Collins: After last ­season, expect him to retire.

WR Rashied Davis: A standout special-teams player who proved he can help out on offense.

DB Corey Graham: Special-teams ace wants to contribute on “D.”

LB Brian Iwuh: Solid special-teamer and backup linebacker.

C Olin Kreutz: Unquestioned leader is aging but best ­available option.

DB Danieal Manning: Turned down offer from Bears and will test the market.

P Brad Maynard: Has been told the Bears don’t plan to re-sign him.

LB Nick Roach: Bears would like to have him back, but he wants chance to start.

LB Pisa Tinoisamoa: Has been strong-side presence when healthy.

LB Rod Wilson: Might get chance to win job in training camp.

RB Garrett Wolfe: Doubtful he will return after failing to find a niche on offense.

Hopefully Adams and Kreutz will be back
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 10:22:38 am
Boy...  lots of chatter and activity around the Bears DL  (Babin, some UDFA they picked up from Northwestern, etc.)...  and zilch on the OL.

No surprise there.  Business as usual at Halas Hall.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 10:33:44 am
Its early yet. I expect a good FA vet for the line, but they havent done badly so far, adressing CB and DB and two centers
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 11:03:48 am
This will make me very unhappy. Grrrrr!

Bears to play Bucs in London
ASSOCIATED PRESS July 26, 2011 9:59AM

Reprints ShareUpdated: July 26, 2011 10:00AM



LONDON — With the lockout over, the NFL will return to London for a fifth straight year.

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers will play the Chicago Bears at Wembley Stadium on Oct. 23 in the fifth regular-season game in the British capital.

The game was in question because of the lockout. The two sides announced a 10-year labor deal Monday to end the dispute.

The Bucs will be in London for the second time in three years, having lost to the New England Patriots at Wembley in 2009. The Bears beat the Dallas Cowboys in a 1986 preseason game at the old Wembley Stadium.

Copyright 2011 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 11:18:02 am
This will make me very unhappy. Grrrrr!

Bears to play Bucs in London
ASSOCIATED PRESS July 26, 2011 9:59AM

Reprints ShareUpdated: July 26, 2011 10:00AM



LONDON — With the lockout over, the NFL will return to London for a fifth straight year.

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers will play the Chicago Bears at Wembley Stadium on Oct. 23 in the fifth regular-season game in the British capital.

The game was in question because of the lockout. The two sides announced a 10-year labor deal Monday to end the dispute.

The Bucs will be in London for the second time in three years, having lost to the New England Patriots at Wembley in 2009. The Bears beat the Dallas Cowboys in a 1986 preseason game at the old Wembley Stadium.

Copyright 2011 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Looks like a loss to me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 12:04:43 pm
Big Leonard Davis (OG) is looking for a new home...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/26/latest-cuts-leonard-davis-gerald-hayes-rich-seubert/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 12:07:26 pm
Free-agent center Kreutz draws interest from other NFL teams
   
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
10:58 a.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

Getting Olin Kreutz back in the fold will not be a slam dunk for the Chicago Bears.

When they chose not to pursue the veteran center for a contract extension before the lockout, they put themselves in a situation to potentially lose him without having a player to replace him on the roster.

According to a source with knowledge of the situation, Kreutz has four teams “legitimately interested” in him, a list that includes the Bears. The team is expected to discuss his status Tuesday. But talking about it and reaching terms on a contract are different things. The last time Kreutz was unrestricted in 2002, he nearly signed with the Miami Dolphins.

Kreutz has made it clear his first choice is to remain a Bear for the entirety of his career. He’s fiercely loyal but he’s also very prideful and isn’t going to accept a sub-par offer for an organization he has been a part of since he was a third-round draft pick in 1998.

The Bears created extra work for themselves in a chaotic free-agent period like no other by not taking care of the Kreutz situation six months ago. If they don’t re-sign him, they have to find someone to play the position, and getting a center up to speed in Mike Martz’s offense would be no small task.

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 12:17:32 pm
Woo Hoo!  ;D ;D ;D

Ohio State's Sanzenbacher accepts less to join Bears, play in Martz system
     
By Dan Pompei
 
Tribune reporter
 
10:35 a.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

The Chicago Bears landed one of the prizes of the undrafted free agent class Tuesday morning when Ohio State receiver Dane Sanzenbacher agreed to terms with the team.

Sanzenbacher was one of the most pursued undrafted free agents.  His agent Joe Flanagan said Sanzenbacher had been sought by 25 of the 32 NFL teams, and he received phone calls from team owners and quarterbacks offering sales pitches to his client.

Flanagan said Sanzenbacher turned down a $20,000 signing bonus from one team and accepted much less from the Bears because he thought they offered a good opportunity to make the team and he considered himself a good fit for Mike Martz’ offense.

“He envisioned himself a Bear,” Flanagan said.

Sanzenbacher’s stock may have been helped by Jon Gruden, who mentioned Sanzenbacher repeatedly while watching tape with Ohio State quarterback Terrelle Pryor in the ESPN special QB Camp with Terrelle Pryor.

Gruden called Sanzenbacher “reliable,” “tough,” and “a football player.”  He also wondered how Sanzenbacher did not get drafted.

At 5-11, 182, Sanzenbacher is not exceptionally big, and he ran a 4.56 40 yard dash, so he’s not exceptionally fast. But he was voted a team captain and team MVP and was first team all Big Ten.

He started 27 games at Ohio State.
Copyright © 2011, Chicago Tribune
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 12:26:06 pm
Look! An undersized linebacker.  ;D ;D ;D

Bears pursuing free-agent linebacker Durant
   
By Vaughn McClure
 
Tribune reporter
 
10:27 a.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

With the Chicago Bears allowed to reach out to other teams' free agents Tuesday morning, it appears the team is prepared to start looking at other options at strong-side linebacker.
 
According to a source, the Bears already have reached out about unrestricted free agent Justin Durant from the Jaguars and the signing of Durant "could happen." The Bears are looking for another option alongside Brian Urlacher and Lance Briggs, with Nick Roach an unrestricted free agent set to test the market and Pisa Tinoisamoa, also a free agent, coming off major knee surgery. Tinoisamoa would be limited in training camp if re-signed by the Bears.
 
Durant has been high on the Detroit Lions' radar, too, so it will be interesting to see if this becomes a battle of NFC North teams.
 
The 6-foot-1-inch, 240-pound Durant started 10 games last season with the Jaguars and had 55 tackles.

Durant missed some time last season with ankle and groin injuries but had been an effective player for the Jaguars in four seasons.

"I felt like when I was in there that I was important to the defense, and I was contributing a lot," Durant told the Florida Times-Union. "I had a couple injuries, a couple setbacks. They were nagging all year."

The Bears can negotiate with other team's free agents Tuesday but those players can't sign until Friday. If Durant were to sign, he couldn't join the team for practice until the new league year starts, Aug. 4.

vxmcclure@tribune.com
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 12:26:31 pm
Another midget WR?  Really?

OK, whatever. Might as well bring in as many bodies as we can. Maybe if he's really good on teams he can replace Rasheed Davis.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 12:28:16 pm
Free-agent center Kreutz draws interest from other NFL teams
   
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
10:58 a.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

Getting Olin Kreutz back in the fold will not be a slam dunk for the Chicago Bears.

When they chose not to pursue the veteran center for a contract extension before the lockout, they put themselves in a situation to potentially lose him without having a player to replace him on the roster.

According to a source with knowledge of the situation, Kreutz has four teams “legitimately interested” in him, a list that includes the Bears. The team is expected to discuss his status Tuesday. But talking about it and reaching terms on a contract are different things. The last time Kreutz was unrestricted in 2002, he nearly signed with the Miami Dolphins.

Kreutz has made it clear his first choice is to remain a Bear for the entirety of his career. He’s fiercely loyal but he’s also very prideful and isn’t going to accept a sub-par offer for an organization he has been a part of since he was a third-round draft pick in 1998.

The Bears created extra work for themselves in a chaotic free-agent period like no other by not taking care of the Kreutz situation six months ago. If they don’t re-sign him, they have to find someone to play the position, and getting a center up to speed in Mike Martz’s offense would be no small task.

bmbiggs@tribune.com

This is bad news. We may wind up overpaying to keep a guy who's well past his prime, simply because we have no viable replacements in the pipeline. 

This is what happens when you have an imbecile managing the roster.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 12:35:36 pm
Another midget WR?  Really?

OK, whatever. Might as well bring in as many bodies as we can. Maybe if he's really good on teams he can replace Rasheed Davis.

I'd be interested in Malcom Floyd. Sanzanbacher sounds like a posession receiver
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 01:02:36 pm
If we put big Leonard Davis at one OG and big Herman Johnson at the other OG we could probably get by with a sub-300 lb C.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 01:20:17 pm
Looks like the Giants are pretty much blowing up their OL and starting over.  Earlier today they cut OG Rich Seubert and now this:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/26/source-giants-plan-to-cut-shaun-ohara/

O'Hara wouldn't be a bad contingency plan in case the bidding for Kreutz gets out of hand.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 26, 2011, 02:11:15 pm
Wait, are these all football stories, Pinch me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on July 26, 2011, 02:15:20 pm
Like the Oregon State center signing.

OSU and oregon produce pretty good OL and the coaches have NFl experiance.

Linnenkohl has been going against Paea in practice and some  pretty good linemen during their season.

I suspect he needs a season in the weight room and will compete next year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 02:26:46 pm
Linnenkohl was ranked in most scouting reports as the 4th to 6th best C and a mid- to late-round pick. So there appears to be some value there. The question is whether his exceptional intelligence and intangibles can make up for very marginal size and strength (6'2 and barely 300 lbs) against the best DTs in the game, several of whom happen to be in our own division.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on July 26, 2011, 02:33:43 pm
Quote
This is bad news. We may wind up overpaying to keep a guy who's well past his prime, simply because we have no viable replacements in the pipeline. 

This is what happens when you have an imbecile managing the roster.


My thoughts exactly....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 26, 2011, 02:39:28 pm
 I cant wait for Friday ... it's going to get insane like you never saw in your life.  ;D

 I hope sombody is going to record all of this.

 You wont see it again for Ten Years After ...

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFpfureaCVs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFpfureaCVs)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 26, 2011, 02:40:34 pm

 I'm goin home ... FOOTBALL IS BACK !
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 03:22:00 pm
I don't follow the NFL draft very much, but I have one question that perhaps someone could answer.

Each team has 7? choices in the draft.  It would seem to me that any undrafted free agent would be, in the eyes of the Bears, worse than the person they drafted in the last round.  If that were so, why would we be more excited about signing "X", if we didn't even think that "X" was worth drafting in the first place?

I can understand signing a number of UDCs, in the hope that one or two would be good enough to help.  But for any particular UDC, the likelihood of having a better chance of helping the team would be somewhat lower than the guy they drafted last.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on July 26, 2011, 03:36:10 pm
This will make me very unhappy. Grrrrr!

Bears to play Bucs in London
ASSOCIATED PRESS July 26, 2011 9:59AM




































Reprints ShareUpdated: July 26, 2011 10:00AM



LONDON — With the lockout over, the NFL will return to London for a fifth straight year.

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers will play the Chicago Bears at Wembley Stadium on Oct. 23 in the fifth regular-season game in the British capital.

The game was in question because of the lockout. The two sides announced a 10-year labor deal Monday to end the dispute.

The Bucs will be in London for the second time in three years, having lost to the New England Patriots at Wembley in 2009. The Bears beat the Dallas Cowboys in a 1986 preseason game at the old Wembley Stadium.

Copyright 2011 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Oh well...guess I saved myself the cost of tickets
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 26, 2011, 04:25:25 pm
I don't follow the NFL draft very much, but I have one question that perhaps someone could answer.

Each team has 7? choices in the draft.  It would seem to me that any undrafted free agent would be, in the eyes of the Bears, worse than the person they drafted in the last round.  If that were so, why would we be more excited about signing "X", if we didn't even think that "X" was worth drafting in the first place?

I can understand signing a number of UDCs, in the hope that one or two would be good enough to help.  But for any particular UDC, the likelihood of having a better chance of helping the team would be somewhat lower than the guy they drafted last.

 Actually all teams are hoping to NOT draft players that they have an interest in to hope they fall off the radar and can then get them to sign for alot less.

 Sometimes it works ... sometimes it doesnt.

 NFL football is not only subterfuge on the field but off the field.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 04:35:14 pm
I would call it strategy, rather than subterfuge.  And I suppose it is neither good nor bad in and of itself, but is conditional upon it's success or failure.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on July 26, 2011, 04:36:22 pm
Dave P

let's say the Bears like 12 players the last 3 rounds.

They can only draft 3.

Therefore if any of the remaining 9 go undrafted wouldn't they be looking to sign those guys?

After the first 150 college players or so it becomes very difficult to rank the remining players.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 04:39:06 pm
Dave - I understand why the Bears would sign non-drafted free agents.  My question is, why would we, as fans, be more excited about a NDFA than we are about the last draft choice?  It seems by definition that guys that are not drafted by ANYONE are probably not as good as those that were drafted.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 04:50:52 pm
Pompei: Bears may strike gold with undrafted free-agent lode
     
 By Dan Pompei
 
Tribune reporter
 
2:34 p.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

In recent years the Chicago Bears have not found many silver dollars in the undrafted free agent trash bins.  But a more aggressive approach this year might change their luck, as they have agreed to terms with a number of promising prospects.

They may have even found an eventual successor to Olin Kreutz.

Oregon State center Alex Linnenkohl isn’t going to be ready to start this year. But if Mike Tice can develop Linnenkohl and the Bears can retain Kreutz for at least another year, the Bears won’t have to replace Kreutz with a veteran when Kreutz decides to move on.

The Bears were fortunate Linnenkohl was available. In my pre-draft rankings, based on surveying NFL scouts, Linnenkohl was the fifth best center in the country.  One front office man rated Linnenkohl as a fifth round prospect. Seven centers were drafted in April.

The knock on him is that, at 6-4, 304, Linnenkohl lacked ideal bulk and strength. But there are a lot of centers about his size starting in the NFL.

Linnenkohl has excellent instincts and was all academic Pac 10 three times, which means he should be a fairly quick study.  Scouts say he was coached well and uses good technique.  He was a three year starter at Oregon State and is considered slightly better than average athletically.

If Linnenkohl ends up being a find for the Bears, it won’t be the first time they have hit on an undrafted center. Jay Hilgenberg joined the team as an undrafted center in 1981 and subsequently played in seven Pro Bowls.

It isn’t unusual for teams to find centers after the draft.  Among other centers who were not drafted are hall of famer Jim Langer, Jim Otto, Jeff Saturday and Shaun O’Hara.

Another player the Bears acquired Tuesday who should have an excellent chance of sticking is Ohio State wide receiver Dane Sanzenbacher. His agent Joe Flanagan said he was pursued by 25 of the 32 NFL teams, and ESPN analyst Jon Gruden has talked about him as if Sanzenbacher were Jerry Rice.

Sanzenbacher and Mike Martz appear to be an excellent match.  Sanzenbacher isn’t the most physically gifted receiver, which explains why he was passed over on draft weekend. But he runs outstanding routes and has a knack for getting open and making plays.

He was very productive in college, and is highly effective in the slot.      Sanzenbacher helped his stock with a good week at the Senior Bowl.

Another Big Ten product who could have been drafted late is Northwestern defensive tackle Corbin Bryant.  At 6-3, 297, Bryant was considered too small for a lot of teams, but his size won’t be a detriment in Rod Marinelli’s defense.

Bryant, who graduated from Morgan Park High School, has the kind of quickness and athleticism that could enable him to make it with the Bears. Scouts say he needs to learn to play with more strength.

Before the draft, two front-office men ranked Pittsburgh’s Dom DeCiccio as a sixth round pick.  He slipped through the draft cracks because he was considered a safety/linebacker “tweener.”

At 6-3, 232, DeCeccio played strong safety at Pitt. The Bears likely will give him a shot at linebacker.

DeCeccio was a productive college player.  He was limited as an athlete at the safety position, but should be plenty athletic to play linebacker. Scouts say he is competitive and smart, and he plays the ball well.

The Bears picked up one of the better blocking tight ends in the draft in 6-4, 270 pound Andre Smith of Virginia Tech.  The presence of Smith could give the Bears the flexibility to part ways with veteran Desmond Clark.

Prior to the draft, two scouts said Smith would have been worthy of a sixth round pick.

It also would not have been surprising to see cornerback Ryan Jones drafted.  The Northwest Missouri State product has the size, speed and tools to play in the NFL.  He’s a little unrefined and will need to brush up his technique with Bears secondary coach Jon Hoke.

Here is the list of the 19 undrafted free agents signed by the Bears:

The Chicago Bears agreed to terms with the following 19 undrafted rookie free agents today:

Kyle Adams, TE, Purdue

Tressor Baptiste,  LB, Texas A&M

JC Brignone,  C, Mississippi State

Antareis Bryan, CB, Baylor

Corbin Bryant,  DT, Northwestern

Travis Cobb,  WR,  Arizona

Josh Davis,  T, Georgia

Ricky Henry,  G, Nebraska

Mike Holmes,  CB, Syracuse

Robert Hughes, RB, Notre Dame

Ryan Jones, CB, NW Missouri State

Alex Linnenkohl,  C, Oregon State

Jordan Miller, DT, Southern

Deron Minor,  LB, McNeese State

Sean Murnane,  DT, Central Michigan

Andre Smith, TE, Virginia Tech

Winston Venable,  S,  Boise State

Anthony Walters,  S, Delaware

Jimmy Young , WR, TCU

dpompei@tribune.com

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 26, 2011, 04:56:02 pm
Dave - I understand why the Bears would sign non-drafted free agents.  My question is, why would we, as fans, be more excited about a NDFA than we are about the last draft choice?  It seems by definition that guys that are not drafted by ANYONE are probably not as good as those that were drafted.

The reason that Bears fans in particular get excited over UDFAs is that we know Angelo is good for at least two or three wasted picks per draft...  and so if we can get some UDFAs that appear to actually have a shot at making the team, then those players represent at least the POTENTIAL to mitigate some of the negative impact of Angelo's draft miscalculations.

UDFAs are the ultimate hedge against bad drafting, especially in the mid- to lower rounds.  Teams like the Patriots and the Packers have elevated UDFA evaluation to a fine art and have that much stronger of a roster to show for it. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 26, 2011, 04:58:17 pm
I would call it strategy, rather than subterfuge.  And I suppose it is neither good nor bad in and of itself, but is conditional upon it's success or failure.

 I already said that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 26, 2011, 04:58:32 pm
I don't get excited over UDFA's. 

They're undrafted for a reason.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 05:01:57 pm
I don't get excited over UDFA's. 

They're undrafted for a reason.

That's all I was saying.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 26, 2011, 05:04:27 pm
I don't get excited over UDFA's. 

They're undrafted for a reason.

 Phil23 and DaveP agree ... expect a solar flare ... the world is coming to an end in the next 8 minutes.  ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 05:25:23 pm
I agree with Phil when he is right.  I disagree with Phil when he is wrong.

If Oddo is ever right, I would agree with him.

But you are right.  A solar flare is more likely than Oddo ever being right.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 26, 2011, 05:27:01 pm
I agree with Phil when he is right.  I disagree with Phil when he is wrong.

Hey when am I ever wrong? 

Besides what you think may be "wrong" is only YOUR opinion.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 05:30:12 pm
True, until we present facts to support our opinions, as opposed to presenting OTHER people's opinions to prove our own.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 26, 2011, 05:34:27 pm
That goes for you too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 26, 2011, 05:42:38 pm
Roy Williams will be released by the Cows.

I wouldn't mind having him here for a try.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 26, 2011, 05:45:22 pm
And the Cows are cutting Marion Barber too!

I'd definitely sign him!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 26, 2011, 06:11:05 pm
And the Cows are cutting Marion Barber too!

I'd definitely sign him!!!
Roy Williams will be released by the Cows.

I wouldn't mind having him here for a try.

 I dont know what it is about those two guys ... but if the cowboys dont want them ...

 Williams was a head case going back to deeeeeeetroit. Famous for dropped balls at dallas.

 Barber is never on the field long enuff to see what he has. He gets tweeked too often.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 06:29:53 pm
Roy Williams will be released by the Cows.

I wouldn't mind having him here for a try.

McNabb was in Hallas Hall today. Could he sign with the Bears to be backup QB?

Would you go for him Phill?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 26, 2011, 06:42:18 pm
McNabb was in Hallas Hall today. Could he sign with the Bears to be backup QB?

Would you go for him Phill?

 Not speaking for Phil ... BUT ... WHO almost won us a trip to the SUPERBOWL ?

 It wasnt McNabb ... and it wasnt Cutler.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 26, 2011, 06:46:18 pm
McNabb is not coming here and I don't want him.  We have Cutler.

Hanie is a nice back up and should of been ahead of Collins period but lets not get ahead of ourselves jj.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 26, 2011, 06:59:51 pm
McNabb is not coming here and I don't want him.  We have Cutler.

Hanie is a nice back up and should of been ahead of Collins period but lets not get ahead of ourselves jj.

 Actually we wernt ahead of ourselves but behind ourselves when it came to the QB depth chart last year.

 It cost us $2 000 000 for Collins and probably a trip to the SUPERBOWL ... BUT ...

 thats a discussion for another time and another place.  :)  ;)  :D  ;D  >:(  :(  :o  8)  ???  ::)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 07:06:01 pm
Not speaking for Phil ... BUT ... WHO almost won us a trip to the SUPERBOWL ?

 It wasnt McNabb ... and it wasnt Cutler.

Well the Bears have about 35 Mill to spend. This year there is a cap floor meaning there is a minimum the owners can spend. The Bears are going to have to spend some money. The money spent today was chicken feed. Its like they signed 2 centers to minimum FA contracts. They need to go after somebody and pay them well, hopefully some offensive linemen, a backup QB, a DT and a big WR. Otherwise they wont meet that cap minimum. McNabb wouldnt surprise me one bit
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 26, 2011, 07:24:49 pm
Signing McNabb is a pipe dream.  He does not want to be a back up.  He is going to the Vikings more then likely.

Plus I do not want him.  We paid two first round picks and signed Cutler to a big contract he is our QB.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 26, 2011, 07:30:16 pm
Peke who do you expect to spend 30 Mill on? Just saying to be saying. NFL mandates they spend it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 26, 2011, 07:36:51 pm
It would be much better spent on a top notch OT and OG.  Also re-signing Kruetz and Anthony Adams.  Extending Fortes contract. 

If McNabb wanted to come here for the vet minimum and sit on the bench and shut up....  LOL just kidding.

I believe McNabb still wants to be a starter or he would have played nice in Washington.  He will more then likely end up a Viking.  I it is only my opinion but I am pretty sure I am right on this one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 26, 2011, 07:37:20 pm
Oh and don't be surprised if the Bears pick up a DT or DE either.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 26, 2011, 07:40:34 pm
Still skeptical, but...

Free agent Plaxico Burress drawing interest from Texans, Bears and Rams
(http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2011/07/free_agent_plaxico_burress_dra.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_term=%23nyg)

Source: Bears want Roach as backup (http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post/_/id/4670821/source-bears-want-roach-as-backup)

FA rumors from Moon Mullin (http://www.csnchicago.com/07/26/11/View-from-the-Moon-The-latest-free-agenc/landing_moon_v3.html?blockID=543764&feedID=3769)

Sour grapes from Maynard...

Rare animosity toward Bears' Dave Toub (http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/42024/rare-animosity-toward-bears-dave-toub)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 26, 2011, 08:01:31 pm
Roy Williams -- Good talent, 10 cent brain.  That fumble during the turkey game was hilarious.

Marion the Barbarian -- He would be an upgrade over Taylor.  He may get off the injury snide and is more suitable in a backup/committee role.  Good goal line option, but isn't that what Unga is for?

McNabb -- Not a chance.  We should have gotten a Bulger for a decent price or a proven vet last year.  But the coaches and/or Cutler don't want any chance of a QB controversy to start brewing no way no how.  It's dumb, but that's how Halas Hall thinks about the backup QB position.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on July 26, 2011, 08:16:08 pm
Mankins is going to sign his franchise tag tender...wonder what it would take to deal with NE?  2 number ones is out of the question but they have been known to deal.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 26, 2011, 09:17:45 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-ohio-states-sanzenbacher-accepts-less-to-join-bears-play-in-martz-system-20110726,0,5648125.story

Tom Waddle, Brian Baschnagel, Keith Ortego, and Steve Schubert... these guys with heart never work out... sigh
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 26, 2011, 09:20:26 pm
Looks like a loss to me.

Looks like it is game on...   :D

Nice to be back again
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 07:20:03 am
Bears have sights on Durant
Could be starting strong-side linebacker — if Lions don't sign him
     
By Vaughn McClure, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
10:45 p.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

As of late Tuesday evening, the Bears had yet to agree to terms with free-agent linebacker Justin Durant. But a source close to the player believes the Bears remain in the picture.

According to the source, the Bears inquired about Durant, last with the Jaguars, Tuesday morning. The Bears are looking for stability at the starting strong-side linebacker spot next to middle linebacker Brian Urlacher and weak-side linebacker Lance Briggs.

Durant has been high on the Lions' radar, too.

The 6-foot-1, 240-pound Durant started 42 games in four seasons with the Jaguars and has 230 career tackles. He missed some time last season with ankle and groin injuries but had been an effective player.

Camp Halas? Bears Chairman George McCaskey said Tuesday the team is pleased with training camp at Olivet Nazarene in Bourbonnais.

Asked whether the organization had considered bringing camp back to Halas Hall because of the NFL lockout. McCaskey acknowledged the topic had come up.

"That has been discussed from time to time,'' McCaskey said. "That's a decision for (President Ted Phillips, general manager Jerry Angelo and coach Lovie Smith).

"We're excited to be getting back to Bourbonnais, especially in this situation because we think it will help regroup the team because they haven't had OTAs (organized team activities), they haven't had voluntary workouts. So in terms of building camaraderie, it's better from a facilities standpoint. We think, actually, with the shortened time frame that going to Bourbonnais is the better course of action.''

The Bears are scheduled to report to Bourbonnais on Friday with the first practice scheduled for 3 p.m. Saturday.

Extra points: Ex-Bear Devin Aromashodu agreed to terms on a one-year contract with the Vikings. … Defensive end Israel Idonije said he has no issues with the Bears pursuing a free agent defensive end such as Jason Babin. Idonije also said he wants to remain at defensive end, at 270 pounds, rather than bulk up and switch to defensive tackle again. … Some Bears veterans are headed to Bourbonnais for physical exams. … The Bears' first padded practice at training camp is 7 p.m. Monday.

vxmcclure@tribune.com

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 07:30:33 am
Bears working quickly on Kreutz and Roach
Along with overtures to their own, they are surveying free-agent landscape and players expected to be cut
     
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
8:00 p.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

The Bears started moving fast and furiously on the 2011 season Tuesday morning but at the end of the day the only thing they had announced was the addition of 26 undrafted college free agents.

The Panthers reeled in their own defensive end Charles Johnson, getting him to agree to a $76 million contract with reportedly $32 million guaranteed so they didn't lose another pass rusher the same way Julius Peppers exited.

But for the most part it was a lot of phone calls and a little bit of action leaguewide as team executives and agents alike got a feel for the new system. The Bears began the day with coach Lovie Smith, defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli and linebackers coach Bob Babich having breakfast with free agent Nick Roach at Halas Hall. They expressed a strong desire for him to return, and the starting strong side position is vacant.

The club had negotiations with the representative of center Olin Kreutz, and the Bears surely took note of players being informed they will be released elsewhere such as Cowboys wide receiver Roy Williams and Packers linebacker Nick Barnett. The Bears also have discussed the possibility of Jaguars linebacker Justin Durant. It's also believed the Bears checked in on the situation of special teams ace Corey Graham.

Williams hasn't performed well the last three seasons for the Cowboys, but he's extremely close with Bears wide receivers coach Darryl Drake, who coached him at Texas. Also, Williams had his most productive year as a pro for the Lions playing under Mike Martz. Maybe the Bears will explore Williams as a bargain buy, but players cannot officially be released until Thursday.

Santana Moss won't be coming the Bears' way. He's staying with the Redskins with a $15 million, three-year deal. Interestingly, an agent may have been using the Bears as a ghost bidder with at least two prominent wide receivers in negotiations elsewhere. One of the top available offensive linemen also was locked up as the Ravens hung on to guard/tackle Marshal Yanda.

It's possible thick action won't pick up until later in the week. Veteran free agents cannot sign contracts until 5 p.m. Friday and they are prevented from participating in training camp practices until Aug. 4, the first day of the new league year and nine days before the Bears' exhibition opener against the Bills at Soldier Field.

So, agents will look at the fact teams truly cannot show a player the money until Friday — and the later start date in camp for the free agents — and shop around for the best deal.

It's not like the opening of free agency was for the Bears in March of 2010 when the club committed $55 million guaranteed in less than six hours. There are a lot of players out there and more soon could be added to the discard pile.

Like every team, the Bears played out possible scenarios months ago in preparation for this. Now, they're measuring twice, as general manager Jerry Angelo said. Agents involved said deals could come together quickly. That should be the case soon.

Tribune reporter Dan Pompei.

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 27, 2011, 07:39:14 am
Tom Waddle, Brian Baschnagel, Keith Ortego, and Steve Schubert... these guys with heart never work out... sigh

I had no complaints with Waddle.  He would get sandwiched, creamed, decapitated and still catch and hold on to the ball.  I even have a dusty VHS of him outrunning Sanders to the endzone against ATL. 

I don't blame Izzy wanting to stay put weight wise.  He's been on the yo yo diet for a while.  But I don't necessarily see anything wrong with sneaking him up the middle on 3rd and longs every now and then.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 07:46:08 am
Bears sign 26 rookie free agents
Of group, center Linnenkohl and receiver Sanzenbacher have best chances to stick
     
By Dan Pompei, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
July 27, 2011

Here's a look at the 26 rookie free agents the Bears signed Tuesday.

Kris Adams, 6-3, 194, Texas-El Paso, WR. He has good speed (4.43 40-yard dash) to go along with size and he averaged 22.8 yards per catch last season. Roster chance: Slim.

Kyle Adams, 6-5, 257, Purdue, TE. Rhodes scholar candidate has enough ability to do all aspects of the job, but doesn't stand out in one area. Roster chance: Long shot.

Mario Addison, 6-3, 245, Troy, DE. He is a linebacker-defensive end "tweener" with good speed who could fit in the Bears' upfield scheme. Roster chance: Slim.

Tanner Antle, 6-3, 232, Tulsa, LB. Two selling points: good size and he went to coach Lovie Smith's alma mater. Roster chance: Long shot.

Tressor Baptiste, 6-0, 232, Texas A & M Kingsville, LB. Played against a lower level of competition and does not have great speed, but he made plays. Roster chance: Long shot.

J.C. Brignone, 6-1, 309, Mississippi State, C. He helped himself at the East-West Shrine game, but not enough to get drafted. Roster chance: Long shot.

Antareis Bryan, 6-1, 190, Baylor, CB. He has size and speed, as well as experience playing Cover 2, but he hasn't stayed healthy. Roster chance: Slim.

Corbin Bryant, 6-3, 297, Northwestern, DT. This local product has some of the traits the Bears look for, but might not be consistent enough. Roster chance: Slim.

Travis Cobb, 5-11, 175, Arizona, WR. This speedster's ticket onto the roster could be as a kick returner. He ran a 4.37 40-yard dash at his pro day. Roster chance: Slim.

Josh Davis, 6-7, 313, Georgia, OT. This is a Mike Tice kind of player with excellent size and positional versatility. Roster chance: Fair.

Dom DeCicco, 6-3, 232, Pittsburgh, OLB. A former safety, DeCicco might find a niche on special teams. Roster chance: Slim.

Ricky Henry, 6-3, 308, Nebraska, G. A tough two-year starter, Henry is considered an overachiever who lacks top athleticism. Roster chance: Long shot.

Mike Holmes, 5-10, 186, Syracuse, CB. He is a solid tackler who also can return punts. Roster chance: Long shot.

Robert Hughes, 5-11, 226, Notre Dame, RB. This Hubbard High School grad doesn't have the speed for tailback, but he could compete at fullback. Roster chance: Slim.

Ryan Jones, 5-11, 198, Northwest Missouri State, CB. He has the body and ability to play in the NFL but needs to come on strong. Roster chance: Fair.

Spencer Lanning, 5-11, 195, South Carolina, P. This former walk-on also was a kicker in college. Roster chance: Long shot.

Alex Linnenkohl, 6-2, 304, Oregon State, C. His talent and production suggest he should have been drafted, and the Bears need a young center. Roster chance: Good.

Jordan Miller, 6-1, 298, Southern, DT. He had a decent pro day and some production in college. Roster chance: Long shot.

Deron Minor, 6-0, 230, McNeese State, LB. Undersized linebacker plays strong, as his 26 reps of 225 pounds in the bench press would suggest. Roster chance: Long shot.

Sean Murnane, 6-1, 291, Central Michigan, DT. This is a local product from Carmel High School. He is smaller than ideal, but the Bears like Central Michigan players. Roster chance: Long shot.

Dane Sanzenbacher, 5-11, 182, Ohio State, WR. He was good enough to merit a Combine invite, but he was much more impressive on the football field than at the Combine. Roster chance: Decent.

Andre Smith, 6-4, 270, Virginia Tech, TE. If the Bears keep four tight ends, this big blocker has a shot at being No. 4. Roster chance: Fair.

Winston Venable, 5-11, 212, Boise State, S. He played some linebacker in college but likely is a safety in the pros. Roster chance: Long shot.

Trevor Vittatoe, 6-2, 218, Texas-El Paso, QB. An ankle injury hurt his draft chances, but he is UTEP's all-time leading passer. He will need Nathan Enderle to bomb or an injury. Roster chance: Long shot.

Anthony Walters, 6-0, 204, Delaware, S. This high school QB has the speed and athleticism to play at the NFL level. Roster chance: Slim.

Jimmy Young, 6-0, 204, Texas Christian, WR. He isn't a burner and was TCU's third leading receiver, but Young showed enough to merit a Combine invitation. Roster chance: Slim.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 27, 2011, 07:56:40 am
Was Roy Williams with the Lions when Martz was there?  If so...  maybe.... IF the price was right.  Otherwise, NFW.

Barber, I'd at least take a look at.  Total beast of a runner when healthy.

McNabb is going to the Vikings. It's all but a done deal.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 27, 2011, 08:00:32 am
BTW if we sign Jason Babin to big money and then move Izzy back to DT (AGAIN), I will be seriously pissed.

Not to mention that would make Corey Wootten pretty much a wasted pick.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 08:54:57 am
What they need is another stud DT to go along with Paea or whatever his name is. They need to create more pressure on the inside so the defense cant double the outside.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 09:01:45 am
Bears working quickly on Kreutz and Roach
Along with overtures to their own, they are surveying free-agent landscape and players expected to be cut
     
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
8:00 p.m. CDT, July 26, 2011

The Bears started moving fast and furiously on the 2011 season Tuesday morning but at the end of the day the only thing they had announced was the addition of 26 undrafted college free agents.

The Panthers reeled in their own defensive end Charles Johnson, getting him to agree to a $76 million contract with reportedly $32 million guaranteed so they didn't lose another pass rusher the same way Julius Peppers exited.

But for the most part it was a lot of phone calls and a little bit of action leaguewide as team executives and agents alike got a feel for the new system. The Bears began the day with coach Lovie Smith, defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli and linebackers coach Bob Babich having breakfast with free agent Nick Roach at Halas Hall. They expressed a strong desire for him to return, and the starting strong side position is vacant.

The club had negotiations with the representative of center Olin Kreutz, and the Bears surely took note of players being informed they will be released elsewhere such as Cowboys wide receiver Roy Williams and Packers linebacker Nick Barnett. The Bears also have discussed the possibility of Jaguars linebacker Justin Durant. It's also believed the Bears checked in on the situation of special teams ace Corey Graham.

Williams hasn't performed well the last three seasons for the Cowboys, but he's extremely close with Bears wide receivers coach Darryl Drake, who coached him at Texas. Also, Williams had his most productive year as a pro for the Lions playing under Mike Martz. Maybe the Bears will explore Williams as a bargain buy, but players cannot officially be released until Thursday.

Santana Moss won't be coming the Bears' way. He's staying with the Redskins with a $15 million, three-year deal. Interestingly, an agent may have been using the Bears as a ghost bidder with at least two prominent wide receivers in negotiations elsewhere. One of the top available offensive linemen also was locked up as the Ravens hung on to guard/tackle Marshal Yanda.

It's possible thick action won't pick up until later in the week. Veteran free agents cannot sign contracts until 5 p.m. Friday and they are prevented from participating in training camp practices until Aug. 4, the first day of the new league year and nine days before the Bears' exhibition opener against the Bills at Soldier Field.

So, agents will look at the fact teams truly cannot show a player the money until Friday — and the later start date in camp for the free agents — and shop around for the best deal.

It's not like the opening of free agency was for the Bears in March of 2010 when the club committed $55 million guaranteed in less than six hours. There are a lot of players out there and more soon could be added to the discard pile.

Like every team, the Bears played out possible scenarios months ago in preparation for this. Now, they're measuring twice, as general manager Jerry Angelo said. Agents involved said deals could come together quickly. That should be the case soon.

Tribune reporter Dan Pompei.

bmbiggs@tribune.com

But no word on Adams. Strange huh? They darn sure need somebody to line up next to the rookie
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 27, 2011, 09:12:14 am
Maybe they're waiting to re-up Adams until they can check out some DTs that have been let go by other teams.

Angelo and Ruskell may feel they can get better value by signing somebody else's reject than by extending Adams. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 27, 2011, 09:20:13 am
While the sunshine boys look at other DT options, wouldn't it be a b!tch if the queens swoop him up (http://thevikingage.com/2011/07/25/vikings-interested-in-bears-dt-anthony-adams/) before they decide to fall back on AA.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 27, 2011, 09:25:16 am
Market for Adams Growing (http://chi.scout.com/2/1086920.html) (7/16/2011)

There will be a few big-name tackles, and the group will be bolstered by Kris Jenkins, who has been released by the New York Jets, and Jamal Williams, cut by the Broncos, and the likely availability of Washington’s Albert Haynesworth via trade.  Teams that deploy in a 3-4 might want to chase San Francisco’s Aubrayo Franklin.  But there will also be a very nice group of what in some years might be adjudged a “middle level” pool of tackles, but which this season figures to draw plenty of attention.  At or near the top of that group probably will be Anthony Adams of the Chicago Bears, an unrestricted free agent. Bears officials have noted that re-upping Adams will be a priority for them, and the eight-year veteran recently indicated that his preference is to remain in Chicago, if practicable.  But the Bears got Adams for the relative bargain price of $4.3 million for four years in 2007, and the veteran inside defender, who made a base salary of $900,000 in 2010, probably won’t come this time at anything close to that modest price. Adams, 31, started all 16 games in 2010 - only the second time in eight seasons he has started 16 games - and he proved to be a productive performer, with 37 tackles and two sacks.  Adams can play at both of the inside spots in a 4-3 front, although he isn’t quite as effective on the nose, and he is going to be in surprisingly solid demand.  There are several other solid tackles available for a change in free agency - Remi Ayodele (New Orleans), Barry Cofield (New York Giants), Derek Landri (Carolina), Brandon Mebane (Seattle) and Daniel Muir (Indianapolis), among them - but Adams might get more play than than any of them if he doesn’t re-sign with the Bears before testing the market.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 09:43:56 am
Interesting to see that the Williams boys will have to serve their 4 game suspensions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 09:51:16 am
If they screw around too long they will lose Adams.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 27, 2011, 09:54:49 am
I believe Ruskell has a connection to Brandon Mebane from the Seattle days.  In fact Mebane may have been a Ruskell draft pick.

I wonder if the plan is to let Adams walk and go after Mebane...  who is a bit more stout than Adams (6'1, 311) and quite a bit younger?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 10:12:05 am
There is some logic to that. Sounds like a plan.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 27, 2011, 10:13:38 am
Besides Forte, Gregg Olsens contract can be extended if we need to spend some cash.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 10:13:49 am
Draft picks Enderle, Thomas agree to terms with Bears
     
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
9:20 a.m. CDT, July 27, 2011

The Chicago Bears are off to a quick start with their draft picks Wednesday morning. Two of them have been brought into the fold, as fifth-round pick Nathan Enderle and sixth-round pick J.T. Thomas have deals in place.

Both players received four-year contracts, per the club’s policy, and that leaves three rookies to sign before Saturday’s first practice at 3 p.m.

Given Cliff Stein’s efficiency getting draft picks signed, sealed and delivered, chances would seem to be decent that all will be accounted for when the team takes the field at Olivet Nazarene University in Bourbonnais, Ill.

Enderle receives a signing bonus of nearly $170,000 with a total value of almost $2.2 million. The deal was negotiated by Joe Linta, who represented former Bears quarterback Jim Miller.

Thomas signed his deal first this morning, as reported earlier. His contract was negotiated by Michael Giorgio and John Massaroni.

Obviously, getting first-round draft Gabe Carimi to camp on time is essential if the club has plans to allow him to compete for a starting job in Week 1.

The Bears’ year one rookie pool allocation is $3,276,825 million.

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers became the first team to agree to a contract with a 2011 draft pick, carving out a deal for linebacker Mason Foster, a third-round draft pick. The Bucs then got the first first-round pick to sign this morning with defensive lineman Adrian Clayborn.

bmbiggs@tribune.com


Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 10:17:16 am
Besides Forte, Gregg Olsens contract can be extended if we need to spend some cash.

You know, that seems to be what the Bears are doing. Ya just know they need to spend some money according to the rules.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 27, 2011, 10:37:00 am
A front four of Peppers, Mebane, Paea and Izzy wouldn't stink...  and would get us within at least shouting distance of our division rivals in terms of DL talent.

Re the rookie contracts, I have no worries those will get done timely. In dramatic contrast to the rest of the clowns at Halas Hall, Stein is actually one of the best in the league at what he does.  And I don't see Carimi being a problem as he was drafted a fair bit lower than many expected and therefore doesn't have a lot of leverage.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 11:09:54 am
I am still concerned about the OLine situation at LG particularly. We desperately need an upgrade. I see we picked up an OG as an undrafted FA

Josh Davis, 6-7, 313, Georgia, OT. This is a Mike Tice kind of player with excellent size and positional versatility. Roster chance: Fair.

Ya catch that JJ. I know ya did.

Well it say OT but he may not be athletic enough to make it outside, but watch Tice work on him, maybe move him inside.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 27, 2011, 11:49:58 am
As far as I'm concerned, the more big bodies we've got in the mix for this abbreviated training camp, the better.

Lance Louis, Edwin Williams and Josh Asiata did not inspire confidence in their opportunities last season, and Herman Johnson is a complete X factor.

BTW if anyone can find a scouting report on Josh Davis, please post.  Google's not turning up much...  this kid must be pretty far under the radar.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 27, 2011, 11:56:28 am
IMHO if they intend to go for a championship they have to improve both the Oline and the DLine. They are contenders if they do.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 27, 2011, 12:14:33 pm
This is all I could muster on Davis (http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=77209&draftyear=2011&genpos=).  Projected 7th to UDFA.  Underwhelming.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 27, 2011, 12:41:42 pm
I stumbled onto a Falcons forum of all places.  The posts seems to have good info although I cannot pinpoint the original source.

Josh Davis (http://falcfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=15239)

ALEX LINNENKOHL (http://falcfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=14765) +1 (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/778847-power-ranking-the-top-50-undrafted-free-agents#/articles/778847-power-ranking-the-top-50-undrafted-free-agents/page/13)

J.C. BRIGNONE (http://falcfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=15253)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 27, 2011, 12:47:21 pm
Ricky Henry (http://ajc.stats.com/nfldraft/players.asp?id=167780) +1 (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/778847-power-ranking-the-top-50-undrafted-free-agents#/articles/778847-power-ranking-the-top-50-undrafted-free-agents/page/14)

In his second season with Nebraska after transferring from North Dakota State College of Science, Henry earned a spot on the All-Big 12 first team in 2010, for helping to pave the way for the nation's ninth-ranked rushing offense. The Cornhuskers averaged nearly 250 yards on the ground, started 9-1 and won the Big 12 North. Henry's pass-blocking ability isn't nearly as NFL-ready, which will likely hurt him on draft day and may drop him into free agency. Henry is on the lower end of the spectrum in terms of size and athleticism for a professional lineman, but some NFL teams still may be interested in the supremely physical presence he brings to the field. Henry is known for his punishing blocks and a mean streak so vicious that he has sometimes struggled to control it, even against teammates in practice. That's the type of attribute that is difficult to teach in an offensive lineman, and a coach who feels he can improve Henry's technique and footwork and harness his intense physicality may encourage his team to take a chance in the later rounds.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 27, 2011, 02:05:51 pm
" Henry is known for his punishing blocks and a mean streak so vicious that he has sometimes struggled to control it, even against teammates in practice.

Just the kind of nasty streak we need on our OL for quite some time.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 27, 2011, 02:39:13 pm
I am still concerned about the OLine situation at LG particularly. We desperately need an upgrade. I see we picked up an OG as an undrafted FA

Josh Davis, 6-7, 313, Georgia, OT. This is a Mike Tice kind of player with excellent size and positional versatility. Roster chance: Fair.

Ya catch that JJ. I know ya did.

Well it say OT but he may not be athletic enough to make it outside, but watch Tice work on him, maybe move him inside.

 I did.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 27, 2011, 02:58:57 pm
" Henry is known for his punishing blocks and a mean streak so vicious that he has sometimes struggled to control it, even against teammates in practice.

Just the kind of nasty streak we need on our OL for quite some time.

U of Nebraska has a long legacy of turning out O-Lineman who play with an intensity bordering on the psychotic.  Which for an O-Lineman is great as long as it can be harnessed.  And as long as it's not simply roid rage.  I see Henry as an extreme longshot to make even the practice squad, but it can't hurt our DL to go up against some guys with that kind of motor.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 27, 2011, 03:03:09 pm
The thing I don't get is why we're bringing in these undersized Centers that only have a chance in a zone blocking scheme.

Last I checked Mike Tice is anything but a zone blocking guy. Doesn't seem like we're bringing in the right players for the system here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on July 27, 2011, 04:23:37 pm
Hilgenburg was a phenomenal smallish center that was undrafted. If one or more of these stick,I'll be happy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 27, 2011, 04:32:01 pm
Hilgenburg was a phenomenal smallish center that was undrafted. If one or more of these stick,I'll be happy.

 Sporty the problem is ... none of us know what the hell Tice is up to.

 He took junk and made it into somthing.

 Thats what IM HOPING the Herman Johnson thing is about.

 Friday should be stone freakin nuts. Everything could go out the window.  :o
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 27, 2011, 04:53:08 pm
Maybe Tice figures if he gets as big as possible at T and G that he can get by with a smaller center. Whether that C be Kreutz or someone else.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 27, 2011, 06:32:29 pm
Maybe Tice figures if he gets as big as possible at T and G that he can get by with a smaller center. Whether that C be Kreutz or someone else.

 No shiiiit ... I've been wondering about that too. Tice does have the largest line at OL ... minus Center.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 27, 2011, 06:36:31 pm
Centers are almost always the smallest guy on the line (and the smartest). 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on July 27, 2011, 07:21:19 pm
I remember watching Hilgy. He was so quick,he'd bump his guy and then instantly be on the MLB. He moved so fast....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 27, 2011, 10:07:27 pm
Bears contact Colon; busy behind scenes (http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post/_/id/4670855/bears-contact-colon-busy-behind-scenes)

The Bears have made contact with Steelers tackle Willie Colon about the possibility of making a deal, according to an NFL source. But it's believed that Colon is actually more of a contingency plan for if the Bears are unable to land Saints tackle Jermon Bushrod.  Interestingly, though, the availability of Colon and Bushrod could potentially be determined by what happens in Atlanta with the Falcons trying to sign free-agent tackle Tyson Claybo, and guards Justin Blaylock and Harvey Dahl. The Bears expressed interest in Claybo prior to the NFL draft, but obviously drafted Gabe Carimi in the first round.  Still, the team is interested in beefing up the offensive line because of the inexperience of Carimi and second-year man J'Marcus Webb, not to mention concern about the duo not being able to participate in a team-supervised offseason conditioning program. It's also worth keeping in mind that offensive line coach Mike Tice prefers to work with tackle types who can kick inside to guard.  So in addition to what's going on with the potential moves in free agency with offensive linemen, the team is also trying to re-sign some of their own players such as center Olin Kreutz, and defensive tackle Anthony Adams, while pondering the idea of bringing in a free-agent receiver such as Brad Smith (the coaching staff is on board, according to sources, but the front office isn't yet sold on Smith).

Jason Babin to Eagles heating up, Bears cooling off
 (http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2011/07/jason_babin_to_eagles_heating_.html)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 28, 2011, 01:21:10 am
Greg Olsen is the Rodney Daingerfield of the Bears I tell ya.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 07:57:25 am
Bears biding time on free agents
They're watching market develop, looking for bargains from plentiful supply
     
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
July 28, 2011
The Bears haven't made a splash around the NFL two days into the new season, but don't think they're not active at the pool.

The club that set the market with the biggest contract in free agency a year ago for Julius Peppers, and the one that made a blockbuster trade for Jay Cutler in 2009, still is positioned to make multiple free agent additions.

The Bears are choosing to monitor the action and let the market settle to where the oversized crop of available players present attractive opportunities. Theirs isn't the only front office waiting for the right time to make moves.

Unrestricted free agents can't practice until Aug. 4 because of league rules, and contracts can't be signed officially until 5 p.m. Friday. Multiple agents believe many teams are waiting until Friday to make offers because they don't want their contract parameters shopped around. It will be a situation where teams say it's their first, best and final offer.

Fans clamoring for deals should relax. General manager Jerry Angelo still can acquire a wide receiver, an offensive lineman, a defensive lineman, a linebacker and more.

Some big deals have been completed. Wide receiver Santonio Holmes got $10 million per year from the Jets. Another day of significant deals could spur more movement.

The Bears don't seem to be involved in the pursuit of defensive end Jason Babin anymore.

They continue to express interest in re-signing cornerback/special teams ace Corey Graham, but he has multiple suitors. When Bears Pro Bowl special teamer Brendon Ayanbadejo aggressively shopped himself in 2008, the Bears pulled out of the bidding. That's not to say that will happen with the highly valued Graham.

Activity is warming for punter Steve Weatherford, and the Bears need to replace Brad Maynard.

With other teams shaking up their rosters, the landscape will become a little clearer Thursday afternoon when clubs officially can release players. That will swell the marketplace, and many linemen will be seeking jobs. (Hooray)

The Bears did sign two of their five draft picks Wednesday as quarterback Nathan Enderle (fifth round) and linebacker J.T. Thomas (sixth round) got four-year deals. Enderle's base value is at $2.209 million, including a $168,860 signing bonus. Thomas' contract is worth $2.133 million with a $92,520 signing bonus.

All of the draft picks are believed to be at Olivet Nazarene in Bourbonnais already. But if they don't have contracts done by Friday morning — when camp officially begins — they will have to leave. The Bears will practice for the first time at 2:30 p.m. Saturday followed by a noon workout Sunday. The first practice in pads is at 7 p.m. Monday.

By then, the team ought to have some veterans ready to plug into some of the holes on the roster.

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 08:02:45 am
Agent says Bears offering Olsen in trade
In mass email to NFL GMs, later pulled, Rosenhaus solicits 'reasonable' proposals for tight end
     
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
12:10 a.m. CDT, July 28, 2011
The Bears had a deal in place to trade Greg Olsen during the second round of the 2010 draft that didn't materialize when the Patriots drafted their own tight end.

Now, two nights before the beginning of training camp, the team may be considering trading Olsen again.

His agent Drew Rosenhaus sent a mass email to the league's general managers and personnel people at 7:56 p.m. Wednesday night announcing the Bears were making Olsen available for trade. The email went to scores of people, including Bears general manager Jerry Angelo and contract negotiator Cliff Stein.

"The Bears have granted me permission to seek a trade for Greg Olsen," Rosenhaus wrote. "Please let me know if interested. Sounds like the Bears will be very reasonable on the compensation in return for Greg."

But 11 minutes later, Rosenhaus sent another mass email to the same recipients, including Angelo and Stein, asking them to ignore his previous message.

"Please disregard my previous email regarding Greg Olsen," the one-sentence email said.

What does it mean? Clearly Rosenhaus had permission to shop Olsen or believed he had permission to shop him. One personnel executive who received the email speculated the Bears saw how fast and wide the message was sent and asked Rosenhaus to pull back.

Questions surrounded how Olsen would fit in the offense last season as coordinator Mike Martz has a history of not utilizing tight ends in the passing game. Olsen went to the front office and shared those concerns. There were rumors he would be traded before the draft and the deal with the Patriots nearly happened, according to a Bears source, before they selected Rob Gronkowski 42nd overall.

Olsen had 41 receptions for 404 yards last season and five scores, tying him for the most touchdown receptions on the team. The Bears have two other veteran tight ends on the roster in Brandon Manumaleuna and Kellen Davis.

Olsen, the club's first-round draft pick in 2007, is entering the final year of his rookie contract and will be looking for an extension or an opportunity to play elsewhere.

He was very professional about the situation last season and has developed into a leader in the locker room while being a durable performer on the field. He said the trade talk did not get to him.

"You mean the story that was made up?" Olsen told the Tribune before the start of last season. "It doesn't bother me because I know there is no truth behind it. But it does bother me that people take the liberty to just make up stories for their own personal benefit.

"There was no substance behind it. If there was, tell us. It's easy to say an unnamed source. That could be anybody."

His agent's fingerprints are on the story now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 08:13:33 am
I dont believe Olsen fits the mold of a TE that Martz wants. I doubt his value is high. You might get a 5th or 6th round pick for him. His value is greater to the Bears than to the rest of the league. OTOH, I expect Rosenhaus is trying to talk contract extension meggabucks and the Bears arent biting. Ho Hum, I'll go back to sleep now. This UDFA TE they picked up seems more of what Martz is looking for and thats a blocking TE. Nobody else on the roster does that well, not Olsen, nor Kellen Davis.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 08:21:22 am
There is an old saying, "You snooze, you lose" Lets hope the Bears arent snoozing. Now I understand about not overpaying and setting your price and holding firm, but you have to identify who and what you want and definitely go get it even at more than what you might want to pay. I believe the chance for a Super Bowl ring is at stake with the right moves.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 08:36:09 am
Bears get former Jaguars punter Podlesh to replace Maynard
     
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
8:12 a.m. CDT, July 28, 2011
It’s not the wide receiver or offensive lineman that fans have been clamoring for since the NFL swung back into busines, but the Chicago Bears have filled a definite need.

The club has agreed to terms with punter Adam Podlesh on a five-year contract, according to Adam Schefter of ESPN. He will replace veteran Brad Maynard, whose contract expired after a 10-season run with the organization. Richmond McGee also will compete for the job in training camp.

Podlesh, who will turn 28 next month, averaged 43.8 yards per punt with the Jacksonville Jaguars last season. He had 26 of his punts (45.6 percent) land inside the 20-yard line and was a Pro Bowl alternate. In four seasons with the Jaguars, the Maryland product averaged 42.6 yards.

Podlesh was diagnosed with a rare form of cancer -- Acinic Cell Carcinoma -- in 2009. But he beat it and hasn’t missed any time playing.

The Bears discussed former Illinois punter Steve Weatheford but never talked money with his representatives.

Elsewhere, although the Bears had interest in defensive end Jason Babin at the outset of free agency, that cooled and he reportedly has agreed to terms with the Philadelphia Eagles.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 08:41:20 am
This seems to be a good move.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 08:47:33 am
I guess that if Olsen gets traded (which I don't think will happen), the starting TE job becomes Kellen Davis' job to lose.

Even if he does get traded I have a feeling Angelo's gonna get taken to the woodshed on the deal.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 08:52:11 am
Bears have method to their slowness in free-agent game
 
NEIL HAYES ON THE BEARS July 27, 2011 10:38PM

Those who expected Jerry Angelo to be juggling rookie signings with free-agent recruiting after the lockout might be surprised to know the Bears’ general manager is taking a cool and calculated approach to this bizarre bazaar.

Fans who waited 132 days during the lockout for Angelo to follow up last year’s free-agent windfall will have to wait at least another day — or perhaps two. While Sidney Rice was agreeing to a deal with the Seattle Seahawks, Santonio Holmes was re-upping with the New York Jets and the Washington Redskins were loading up on receivers, Angelo signed two late-round draft picks while sticking his toes in the free-agent waters he dove head first into last year, and not without reason.

Signed rookies can report to training camp immediately and begin digesting playbooks. Free agents can’t begin working out with their new team until Aug. 4, which is one reason to prioritize the youngsters. Because teams can’t officially consummate veteran free-agent deals until Friday afternoon, general managers are wary of making their best offers too early for fear agents will shop them to other teams.

Another reason for the Bears slower-than-expected pace might have to do with players they covet receiving more interest from other teams than expected.

Re-signing veteran center Olin Kreutz is a priority, but Kreutz might be wise to weigh his options. He could be on the San Francisco 49ers’ radar after their free-agent center, David Baas, agreed to terms with the New York Giants. Several other Bears free agents might take the same approach, including defensive tackle Anthony Adams, defensive back and special-teams standout Corey Graham and receiver/special-teamer Rashied Davis.

Because players don’t get to be free agents often, they don’t want to rush it.

The Bears also have expressed interest in Pro Bowl defensive end Jason Babin, although their level of interest is likely tied to how much it will take to sign him. It seems more likely that Babin will end up with the Philadelphia Eagles, for whom he played in 2009. He was with the Tennessee Titans last season, when he racked up 121/2 sacks, 71/2 more than his previous high.

His defensive line coach with the Titans was Jim Washburn, who has been hired by the Eagles. During an appearance on “Pro Football Talk Live” on Wednesday, Babin spoke of his fondness for his former and perhaps future position coach.

While the receiver pool is drying up with Santana Moss, Jabar Gaffney, Donte Stallworth, Brandon Stokley and Steve Breaston reportedly off the market, former Missouri quarterback Brad Smith could end up with the Bears as a kick returner, receiver, Wildcat quarterback and all-around chess piece for offensive coordinator Mike Martz.

Another option will present itself when the Dallas Cowboys release receiver Roy Williams. The eight-year veteran enjoyed a career year with Martz when both were with the Detroit Loins in 2006. Bears defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli was the Lions’ head coach at the time. If those aren’t obvious enough connections, Bears receivers coach Darryl Drake recruited Williams to Texas and once called him one of the brightest players he had been around.

Williams never made the expected impact after the Cowboys acquired him from the Lions for three draft picks in 2009. However, at 6-4, 210 pounds, he’s the big receiver Jay Cutler hasn’t had since he left Brandon Marshall in Denver. Given Williams’ success with Martz and Drake, he might be worth the risk when Angelo decides to join the fray.

Contributing: Sean Jensen
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 08:54:10 am
Bears have method to their slowness in free-agent game
 
NEIL HAYES ON THE BEARS July 27, 2011 10:38PM

the Bears’ general manager is taking a cool and calculated approach to this bizarre bazaar. 

Translation:  He's been golfing during the entire lockout and hasn't gotten his lazy azz back up to speed yet.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 08:55:50 am
Translation:  He's been golfing during the entire lockout and hasn't gotten his lazy azz back up to speed yet.

Seems right to me although he did get a punter
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 28, 2011, 08:57:13 am
Olsen is a decent blocker and a decent receiver with good speed.
He doesn't light defenses up like we all expected him to.
I guess the bears figure he'll want more money next year than they will be willing to pay him and want to try to get something from him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 08:58:03 am

Another option will present itself when the Dallas Cowboys release receiver Roy Williams. The eight-year veteran enjoyed a career year with Martz when both were with the Detroit Loins in 2006. Bears defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli was the Lions’ head coach at the time. If those aren’t obvious enough connections, Bears receivers coach Darryl Drake recruited Williams to Texas and once called him one of the brightest players he had been around.

Williams never made the expected impact after the Cowboys acquired him from the Lions for three draft picks in 2009. However, at 6-4, 210 pounds, he’s the big receiver Jay Cutler hasn’t had since he left Brandon Marshall in Denver. Given Williams’ success with Martz and Drake, he might be worth the risk when Angelo decides to join the fray. 

I'm starting to think that if the price is right, this could happen.  Roy Williams is a complete moron (at least off the field), and he considers himself a way better player than he actually is... but when you look at the information presented above you have to think the boys in Halas Hall might pull the trigger.  Especially if Williams is willing to work dirt cheap.  Having him back in the NFC North and motivated to beat up on the Lions twice a year might not be the worst thing...  the question is, will Martz be willing to keep two big WRs on the roster cause if not then either Williams or Fantuz would be redundant.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 09:01:58 am
I guess that if Olsen gets traded (which I don't think will happen), the starting TE job becomes Kellen Davis' job to lose.

Even if he does get traded I have a feeling Angelo's gonna get taken to the woodshed on the deal.

Correct, because Olsen isnt valued as highly around the league. Angelo would end up giving Olsen away for virtually nothing.

And Kellen Davis hasnt proved he is capable of starting in the NFL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 09:07:13 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/28/bears-bag-a-punter/

2 million a year for a punter?  Seriously?  That guy better be world-class.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 09:08:10 am
I kind of expect the Roy Williams deal too although Malcom Floyd might be better. I am dying to see Fantuz play. I am pulling for him to make it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 09:15:40 am
I would take Floyd over Roy Dub as well.  I like Sims-Walker, James Jones, and Steve Smith (Carolina via trade). 

But dammit, I just can't shake off a possibly motivated Moss.  I still think he's worth a look.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 28, 2011, 09:23:10 am
hmm, wonder would Steve Smith for Olsen be a good trade?
They have a good OL and a decent receiving TE can be a young QB's best friend.
I think Smith would really open things up for us. We might have the smallest WR core in the league but we would also have one of the most explosive.

if you had Smith, Knox and Hester all on the field at the same time, someone is going to get free if the line can hold their blocks for more than 2 secs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 09:28:18 am
hmm, wonder would Steve Smith for Olsen be a good trade?
They have a good OL and a decent receiving TE can be a young QB's best friend.
I think Smith would really open things up for us. We might have the smallest WR core in the league but we would also have one of the most explosive.

if you had Smith, Knox and Hester all on the field at the same time, someone is going to get free if the line can hold their blocks for more than 2 secs.

But thats been the problem unless they go out and get a couple of vet interior lineman.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 09:30:07 am
hmm, wonder would Steve Smith for Olsen be a good trade?
They have a good OL and a decent receiving TE can be a young QB's best friend.
I think Smith would really open things up for us. We might have the smallest WR core in the league but we would also have one of the most explosive.

Interesting idea...  probably not happening though.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/28/report-carolina-wont-trade-steve-smith/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 09:34:43 am
I would take Floyd over Roy Dub as well. 

On talent, youth and upside, no question. But the deal is that Roy Williams has not only has worked in Martz' system before, but had a fair degree of success in it (2006 stats = 82 catches, 1,310 yards, 7 TDs).  Especially in this shortened offseason, when people have to get up to speed on things in a hurry, that's an advantage in Williams' favor that can't be discounted.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest118 on July 28, 2011, 09:35:39 am
I have no problem with signing that punter. He seem top notch. Maynard never seemed to have a strong enough leg. You have a reall good D and good punter/pecial teams - you will win a lot of games.

No thank you to Roy Williams. he has only one good season in 7 seasons. The lasst 2 have been way sub-par. get me Steve Smith for a 3rd rounder!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 09:39:39 am
We're gonna need a top-notch punter if our offense doesn't improve a lot, that's for sure.

Re Roy Williams, I think the biggest question on him isn't ability, but motivation.  Clearly the price the Cowboys paid to get him from the Lions went to his head and he started thinking he was all that when in reality he was no better than the 3rd best WR on that Cowboys team. At this point in his career the respect factor for him around the league is very low, as are expectations.  Does he have the character to use that as motivation and get things turned around with his next team?  And, is he willing to accept #3 WR money in exchange for that shot at redemption?

Also, if we're looking for more big bodies to add to the OL mix, Max Starks from the Steelers is available.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 10:15:11 am
I understand that. I suppose Martz has been querried. If Martz has given his approval then I'd expect something to happen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 10:51:32 am
Starks is coming off neck surgery and gained a bit.  Buyer beware I guess.  When a competent front office lets a starter go, they normally do it for a good reason.  But having him (6'8" 345 + 20 or 30 this offseason), Big Leonard (6'6" 365), or Big Herman (6'7" 360) on the line would certainly tip the scales.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 10:54:16 am
Where there is smoke, there is usually fire

Chicago Bears NFL sources confirm Bears are shopping Olsen

By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
10:14 a.m. CDT, July 28, 2011
Drew Rosenhaus did not jump the gun: Chicago Bears tight end Greg Olson is very much in play, according to NFL personnel sources.

The timing may seem curious, but trading was not permitted until the league opened the doors for business Tuesday morning. The Bears must have made the determination during the four-month lockout that they can improve their offense by moving in a different direction.

As the Tribune reported Thursday, Rosenhaus sent an email Wednesday night to all 32 teams, including the Bears, announcing that he had permission to seek a trade.

“The Bears have granted me permission to seek a trade for Greg Olsen,” Rosenhaus wrote in the email the Tribune received from an NFL personnel source. “Please let me know if interested. Sounds like the Bears will be very reasonable on the compensation in return for Greg.”

Eleven minutes later, Rosenhaus sent another mass email to the same recipients, including Angelo and Stein, asking them to ignore his previous message.

“Please disregard my previous email regarding Greg Olsen,” the one-sentence email said.

However, a separate NFL source called this morning and said the word is the Bears are still working to trade Olsen whether they’re enlisting the help of Rosenhaus or not.

It’s a situation that could become awkward on Friday morning when training camp officially begins. The Bears would not want Olsen to become injured in practices – which begin Saturday at 2:30 p.m. – if they are intent on dealing him.

Rosenhaus would clearly invite a trade – and maybe Olsen would too – because any team making a move to get him would likely want to sign him to a contract extension as he is entering the final year of his rookie deal. So, the club trading for Olsen would want to have parameters for a new contract in place before executing the trade. That is why the Bears would have to give Rosenhaus permission to negotiate with teams, in order to get that contract hammered out.

It could very well be that Rosenhaus still has permission to negotiate a contract, but maybe he’s been told by the Bears to do it without flying a banner overhead of the whole operation.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 10:59:12 am
The window of getting anything for Olsen has closed since the Pats passed on him last year.  Checkbox Clusterfk Angie has reared his ugly head once again.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 11:00:28 am
Or is it Ruskel flexing his muscles?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 11:07:47 am
Use those muscles and get Mebane...

or Asomugha ("climbed aboard the dream weaver train")

Can't wait to see what transpires tomorrow.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 11:19:10 am
Casey Rabach cut by the Skins.

That makes at least two veteran fallbacks at C (Rabach and Shaun O'Hara) in case a deal with Kreutz doesn't work out. Albeit, at 33-34 years old for both of those guys I wouldn't want to do more than a 2-year deal with either of them.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 11:26:25 am
This may open the door for that UDFA from Ohio State:

http://discussions.chicagotribune.com/20/chinews/chi-bears-lose-receiver-rashied-davis-to-lions-20110728/10
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 28, 2011, 11:38:39 am
Well we wont have Rashied to pile on any more.  Good ridence. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 11:41:43 am
It certainly looks like the protected status of Bears' special teamers has been lifted.

Maynard gone, Rasheed gone...  Garrett Wolfe and Corey Graham soon to follow, I suspect.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on July 28, 2011, 11:51:32 am
A buddy of mine (who is admittedly a huge Ohio State fan) just told me that Sanzenbacher is the next Wes Welker.

I'd take that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 12:08:36 pm
49ers in the mix for Kreutz:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/28/49ers-trying-to-take-olin-kreutz-from-bears/

Is this the year Angelo and Ruskell let all the "sentimental favorites" walk away virtually without a fight?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 12:08:50 pm
Bears could look to add WR if they move Olsen
     
 The Bears are showing interest in Chargers receiver Malcolm Floyd. (Colorado Springs Gazette)

By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
10:40 a.m. CDT, July 28, 2011
With the Chicago Bears seeking to trade Greg Olsen, the offense could have a significantly different look this season without the veteran tight end.

Typically, the tight end has been used more as a pass blocker in Mike Martz offenses, not a pass receiver. Replacing Olsen could be another wide receiver. Yes, we’re getting ahead of ourselves here because the Bears haven’t moved Olsen, but there are several prominent wide receivers that could be available.

Malcolm Floyd is a 6-5, 225-pound target who can run. The San Diego Chargers would like him back because they don’t have much opposite Vincent Jackson and Jackson could depart after this season. Floyd might be a nice fit in Minnesota where the Vikings lost Sidney Rice. He should also come a little more modestly priced than Rice, but a bidding war could escalate his contract numbers quickly.

According to a league source, the Bears have made contact regarding Floyd. That doesn't mean they've talked money, though.

Roy Williams is expected to be released by the Dallas Cowboys later Thursday when the NFL’s waiver wire will crank up for the first time this year. Bears wide receivers coach Darryl Drake coached him at Texas and the two have a close relationship, similar to how Drake remains in touch with Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Hines Ward. Williams had his finest season as a pro playing under Martz for the Detroit Lions. After flopping in Dallas, he could also come at a cheaper price as he’ll need to prove himself again to fetch top dollar.

Braylon Edwards is on his way out of New York after the Jets committed $10 million annually to Santonio Holmes. He’s another bigger target that could fit into the mix.

No one is saying Olsen is definitely going anywhere, but the email the Tribune obtained Wednesday night quoted agent Drew Rosenhaus as saying the Bears “will be very reasonable on the compensation in return for Greg” suggests it won’t take a lot for him to be packaged and sent away.

There are choices out there if the Bears want to replace the tight end with a bigger receiver. Despite all the hand wringing by fans the last two days, plenty of options remain available.

bmbiggs@tribune.com

Twitter @BradBiggs

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 12:12:10 pm
Interesting article, and I had been thinking the same thing.

If you do want to keep two big WRs in Martz' scheme (Fantuz + Floyd or Roy Williams or whomever), the best (and really only) way to make that work on our roster would be to downsize one of our pass-catching TEs.

I haven't seen enough of Malcolm Floyd to know if he would be an upgrade over Olsen in our offense, but it's an interesting idea anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 28, 2011, 12:13:25 pm
I kind of hope we dont lose Kruetz. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 12:13:49 pm
Bears sign Matt Spaeth TE

I watched him in college.  Solid pass catcher.  Probably more of a blocking TE with Pitt.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 12:17:46 pm
Bears sign Matt Spaeth TE

I watched him in college.  Solid pass catcher.  Probably more of a blocking TE with Pitt.

Thats the type of TE that Martz likes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 28, 2011, 12:22:05 pm
I think Martz wants the guy that can go toe to toe with a DE and then occasionally slip out and catch something for 5yards and rumble for a few more.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 12:23:25 pm
Bears exploring Cowboys DT Stephen Bowen (http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2011/07/bears_exploring_cowboys_dt_ste.html)

The Bears are interested in defensive lineman Stephen Bowen, a largely unknown -- and undrafted -- player from the Dallas Cowboys.  But multiple league sources say Bowen could "surprise" the general public with his eventual contract.  That's because Bowen is a young player who is versatile and could just be reaching his prime.  According to his bio on NFL.com, Bowen is 6 foot 5, 305 pounds, and he has started 11 of 32 games in the last two seasons. But he's been productive, with 4 1/2 sacks and one forced fumble.  Why all the interest?  He's athletic enough to play in either the 3-4 or 4-3 scheme, and he's heralded for his work ethic.  It sounds like Bowen would prefer to stay where he's at. But, the Cowboys are one of the clubs with the least salary cap space, while the Bears have among the most.

"I know Dallas wants me and I'd love to be back," Bowen told ESPN Dallas. "I don't know what's happening and hopefully I'll be back."
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 12:26:35 pm
So, we need OL, WR and CB and we're sniffing around backup TEs and [even more] D-Linemen?

Yeah that makes all kinds of sense   ::)

Spaeth is one big mofo, I know that.  Kinda like that Angulo kid we had in here last year that didn't stick. Maybe that means Malamaleuna's fat old worthless azz is headed out the door. I hope so, anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 12:29:23 pm
I think Martz wants the guy that can go toe to toe with a DE and then occasionally slip out and catch something for 5yards and rumble for a few more.

Yup, definitely match up against the DE
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 12:35:06 pm
Bowen just signed with the Skins.

I think at this point it's pretty clear what's going on in Halas Hall.  Angelo and Ruskell aren't targeting players, they're targeting price points.

It's a pure auction mentality. I.e., they have decided, we will spend up to XX dollars on this position.  Once the bidding on a particular player passes a certain point, we pull out and turn our attention to the next guy lower on the list.

Or a more cynical way to put it is, we are sitting on our hands till all that's left are the guys no one else wants. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 12:35:38 pm
Anthony Adams may have overpriced himself and Bowen might be a replacement. Remember Tommy Harris is gone. We have the rookie Paea penciled in to replace him. You need some kind of veteran leadership along that front other than Peppers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 12:37:15 pm
Great, we got fantasy football auction players in the front office.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 12:52:08 pm
Looks like we will have a major turnover on ST. These new UDFAs will have to step up
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 28, 2011, 12:54:19 pm
Bowen is a 3-4 end...effective with the Cowboys but just a part time player.  You think he wants to play 4-3 DT or 4-3 end?  Not a big loss.

Bears weakest part of their game was their pass offense.  Run offense wasn't great but improved when Martz committed more to giving Forte the ball.  So now we're supposedly  getting rid of one of our few pass receiving threats in Olsen?   Maybe they've seen something in Kellen Davis who had one catch during the regular season.

We'll need a big (literally) FA signing at WR to compensate for adding more predictability to our offense with the loss of Olsen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 12:55:50 pm
If you think about it, it's the exact opposite approach to last year when there was one prize (Peppers) on the list and we were going to spend as much as it took to get him.

Apparently this year Angelo and Ruskell feel we are fine on impact players and that the team is better served by adding multiple role players at good value.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 12:56:54 pm
Looks like we will have a major turnover on ST. These new UDFAs will have to step up

Yup...  as will rookie draft picks like Conte and J.T. Thomas who are very unlikely to crack the starting lineup but could make significant contributions on Teams out of the gate.

Toub will have to coach up to his reputation once again.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 01:33:08 pm
If the Bears have a plan at C that doesn't involve Kreutz, they have done a very good job disguising it.

Edwin Williams is not the answer...  nor, IMO, is moving Garza over. And the UDFA centers we signed are a couple of years away, at least.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 01:59:56 pm
Bowen is a 3-4 end...effective with the Cowboys but just a part time player.  You think he wants to play 4-3 DT or 4-3 end?  Not a big loss.

Bears weakest part of their game was their pass offense.  Run offense wasn't great but improved when Martz committed more to giving Forte the ball.  So now we're supposedly  getting rid of one of our few pass receiving threats in Olsen?   Maybe they've seen something in Kellen Davis who had one catch during the regular season.

We'll need a big (literally) FA signing at WR to compensate for adding more predictability to our offense with the loss of Olsen.

The weakest part pf their offense was the line couldnt protect. The weakest part of their defense was their DLine. They need to upgrade both. They need to either sign Adams or his replacement. They already replaced Harris. Their defensive backfield will be much better if they can get more pressure up the middle.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 02:37:12 pm
Best news of the day...  Manumaleuna is shipping out.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-report-bears-acquire-former-steelers-te-spaeth-20110728,0,497000.story

Along with Archuleta and Orlando Pace, that makes Angeblow 0-for-3 on worthless ex-Rams pickups.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 02:59:35 pm
The Bears are really going to suck in 2 and 3 TE sets. Unless Kellen Davis drasticly improves his game or that UDFA TE Andre Smith proves better than expected the Bears could be in trouble. Looking at the makeup of the roster the Beats are getting a whole lot younger.

Wasnt Lance Louis also a TE in college? Could be we see some of that too
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 03:02:58 pm
I don't think we'll be seeing a lot of 2 and 3 TE sets.

If Martz ran his system in its purest form there would only be 1 TE on the field most of the time and he'd be blocking.  Spaeth fits that role perfectly because at 6'7 270 he's essentially an underweight 3rd OT. 

Lance Louis, physically, is a virtual clone of a young Manumaleuna and it could be he inherits Manu's H-back position if he doesn't show any more promise as an OG than he did last year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 03:26:41 pm
Is it just me or are there still quite a few current Bears whose fates have to be determined by the end of today?

Kreutz, Anthony Adams, Daniele Manning, Garrett Wolfe, Corey Graham and Nick Roach are all coming to mind and I'm sure I'm forgetting a couple.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 03:42:45 pm
I think now that we are seeing all this roster change maybe we need to re-review that UDFA list again. The TE has just increased his chances of sticking when I never thought he had a chance. The OSU WR looks like he has a real ticket to a roster spot.. Maybe the center from Oregon State makes it too. A player we havent mentioned is the RB Unga. Have we parted with Chester Taylor yet? If they go after an OG I would imagine that Chris Williams could be in trouble making the roster.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 03:47:01 pm
Starting a rookie, UDFA at C in the most protection-dependent offensive scheme in the league...  with an abbreviated preseason, no less?

I haven't been a big fan of Kreutz in recent years, but if that's the plan at Halas Hall that would just be insanity.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 03:52:00 pm
It looks like we have cut a lot of salary when we were already over 30 Mill under the cap
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 03:56:21 pm
It looks like we have cut a lot of salary when we were already over 30 Mill under the cap

Makes me wonder if we are going to make a late push for a couple of pretty expensive guys...  or one stupendously expensive guy.

I have no idea who those players would be though.  There are some OGs out there who would definitely improve our OL from Day One, but none that I can see commanding outrageous coin in a bidding war.  Same deal with the WRs.

We may also be positioning ourselves to give Matt Forte a whopper of an extension, which would be more than well earned.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 03:59:17 pm
Arent those 2 Atlanta OGs both FAs? They would be nice
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 04:07:36 pm
Scratch this guy from somebodys want list.

Ex-Jet Brad Smith gets 4-year, $15 million deal with Bills
     
 3:26 p.m. CDT, July 28, 2011
BUFFALO, N.Y. — Brad Smith's coming to Buffalo, and the wildcat can't be far behind after the multitalented offensive player agreed to a four-year contract worth about $15 million with the Bills.

Smith's agent Mark Bartelstein confirmed his client's agreement and the terms of the contract Thursday.

Smith's versatility as a receiver, rusher and ability to take snaps out of the quarterback spot in wildcat formations complements Bills coach Chan Gailey's wide-open offensive philosophy. A four-year NFL player, Smith also has vast special teams experience as a punt-returner and on coverage units.

In an e-mail to The Associated Press, Smith, a former New York Jet, wrote that he's very glad to be joining the Bills and is excited for the opportunity to play for Gailey.

ESPN.com first reported Smith's deal with the Bills.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 04:27:10 pm
Marc Colombo has been cut by the Cowboys.

He played so poorly last year that the Cowboys cut him rather than take a $2.4 million cap hit which is peanuts for an OT.  He has absolutely nothing left in the tank...  but just watch Jerry Angelo bring him back.  He was Angie's first, 1st round pick as personnel chief of the Bears and I could easily see him giving Colombo another chance... especially if he comes cheap.

If we're gonna go after an ex Cowboys OL then Leonard Davis would be the far smarter (and safer) option.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 28, 2011, 04:31:15 pm
Doubt SERIOUSLY Angelo will bring him back.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 28, 2011, 04:51:08 pm
And glad that bum Manumaleuna has been cut.  What a waste.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 28, 2011, 04:56:57 pm
Scratch this guy from somebodys want list.

Ex-Jet Brad Smith gets 4-year, $15 million deal with Bills

That's not a bad pickup for the Bills. He's a better QB than anyone they had backing up Fitzgerald last year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 28, 2011, 05:56:09 pm
Bears trade Greg Olsen to Panthers

 Posted by Michael David Smith on July 28, 2011, 6:11 PM EDT
 
Getty Images
Last night agent Drew Rosenhaus e-mailed the entire league to say the Chicago Bears are willing to trade tight end Greg Olsen. Today the Bears have, indeed, traded Olsen — to the Carolina Panthers.
 
Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune reports that the Bears traded Olsen to the Panthers for a player and a draft pick. There’s no word on who the player is or what the draft pick is, although Biggs notes that the player is not Steve Smith. (Sorry, Bears fans.)
 
It’s expected that the Panthers will also work out a new contract with Olsen, who is entering the final year of his rookie contract with the Bears.
 
For the Bears, the deal means the team is radically overhauling the tight end position: It comes on the same day they cut tight end Brandon Manumaleuna and signed tight end Matt Spaeth.
 
For the Panthers, the deal shows once again that they’re willing to be extremely aggressive about spending money to improve right now. And Cam Newton just got a good pass-catching tight end.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 06:01:50 pm
Sure wish I knew what the Bears got for Olsen
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 06:07:28 pm
Bears pursuing former Cowboys WR Williams
     
By Vaughn McClure
 
Tribune reporter
 
5:27 p.m. CDT, July 28, 2011
The Chicago Bears have officially started their pursuit of receiver Roy Williams, according to a league source with knowledge of the Bears' thinking.

Williams was released by the Cowboys Thursday afternoon. He previously flourished in Mike Martz’s system while teamed with Martz in Detroit. Martz also has strong ties to Bears receivers coach Darryl Drake, who coached Williams as Texas.

The Bears have been looking for a big receiver to complement their group of speedy targets, and the need for such a receiver just became greater with tight end Greg Olsen being traded to Carolina.

Williams had his best season in 2006 under Martz when he caught 82 passes for 1,310 yards and seven touchdowns for the Lions. The 29-year-old Williams made the Pro Bowl that season.

The 6-foot-3-inch, 215-pound Williams is entering his eighth NFL season. He caught 37 passes for 530 yards and five touchdowns last season with Dallas.

vxmcclure@tribune.com

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 28, 2011, 06:19:34 pm
I don't see Williams as an upgrade from Olsen personally.  But if he takes Oslen's place on the roster and we got a decent draft pick and a decent player then I guess it is a win for the Bears.

I am confused why there has been no announcement as to the player or the draft pick the Bears are getting.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 28, 2011, 06:28:14 pm
Posted by Michael David Smith on July 28, 2011, 6:11 PM EDT
 
Getty Images
Last night agent Drew Rosenhaus e-mailed the entire league to say the Chicago Bears are willing to trade tight end Greg Olsen. Today the Bears have, indeed, traded Olsen — to the Carolina Panthers.
 
Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune reports that the Bears traded Olsen to the Panthers for a player and a draft pick. There’s no word on who the player is or what the draft pick is, although Biggs notes that the player is not Steve Smith. (Sorry, Bears fans.)
 
It’s expected that the Panthers will also work out a new contract with Olsen, who is entering the final year of his rookie contract with the Bears.
 
For the Bears, the deal means the team is radically overhauling the tight end position: It comes on the same day they cut tight end Brandon Manumaleuna and signed tight end Matt Spaeth.
 
For the Panthers, the deal shows once again that they’re willing to be extremely aggressive about spending money to improve right now. And Cam Newton just got a good pass-catching tight end.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 28, 2011, 07:50:07 pm
Bears got a third round pick for Olsen, no players.  Not bad.  This was the last year in Olsens contract and the Bears were not going to pony up the money for him anyway so Angello finally gets something for a player instead of just releasing them.

If the Bears sign a big playmaking WR like Malcom Floyd then I am totally cool with this.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 28, 2011, 07:54:57 pm
Well now that Olsen is gone that must mean the Guru must be planning on running more 3 WR sets.

How many years Martz has left on his contract?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on July 28, 2011, 08:24:46 pm
I liked Olsen but it was really frustrating to see a guy his size go down so easily after the catch.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 08:27:39 pm
A 3rd for Olsen is better than I thought he was worth.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pistol on July 28, 2011, 08:48:23 pm
I don't understand dealing Olson.  Martz might not think highly of the tight end position but Olson was the bestplayer this team had at one of its weakest positions. Martz needs to adjust to the talent he has. If he's such a genius, he can find a way to draw a TE pattern.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 28, 2011, 08:48:52 pm
This is Martz last year on his contract.

I also was disgusted at how Olsen never punished tacklers and went down easily when a DB much smaller then him threw a arm out and hit his leg.  He has been a the biggest wussy when it came to being tackled.  He would fall down when a fly ran into his thigh.  Plus he fumbled WAY too much.

That said he was a decent TE for the Bears and they better have a plan for replacing him.  The Bears need a threat in the red zone.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 28, 2011, 08:55:23 pm
This is Martz last year on his contract.

I also was disgusted at how Olsen never punished tacklers and went down easily when a DB much smaller then him threw a arm out and hit his leg.  He has been a the biggest wussy when it came to being tackled.  He would fall down when a fly ran into his thigh.  Plus he fumbled WAY too much.

That said he was a decent TE for the Bears and they better have a plan for replacing him.  The Bears need a threat in the red zone.

Absolutely, somebody with a big body that can go up for the ball and come down holding onto the ball.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 09:43:40 pm
A 3rd is about all you can ask for.  Olsen's obvious faults aside, he was a playmaker and a target that Cutler trusted during the course of season especially in the red zone.  I'm tired of coaches forcing a rigid scheme on a team and getting $hitty system players like Fat Manu rather than modifying the scheme to maximize the talent that is already on the roster.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on July 28, 2011, 09:53:14 pm
point. which dumbfuck bears coach would come hell or highwater run x amount of offensive plays to see what the other teams d would do?  usually ended up 5 three and  outs and the bears down 14-0 by the half. These **** aren't God. Think of a LT in one of these "systems".
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 10:01:13 pm
Forte wants new deal from Bears — now (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0729-matt-forte-bears-chicago-20110729,0,5765691.story)

Bears running back Matt Forte told the Tribune last week that holding out never helps anyone involved. But he didn't rule out making such a move to nudge the Bears for an extension.  Forte now is strongly considering boycotting training camp when the Bears are to report Friday in Bourbonnais, according to a league source.  Forte said last week he wanted to secure a contract extension before camp, but the timing for that was disrupted with the flurry of free-agent signings and transactions after the NFL lockout. He is due a base salary of $550,000 in the final year of his rookie contract, and he isn't even the highest-paid running back on the team. Backup Chester Taylor is set to make $1.25 million this season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 10:41:52 pm
I'd rather have Roy over MSW

Source: Bears, Mike Sims-Walker talking (http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/6814403/chicago-bears-interested-mike-sims-walker-source-says)

Jaguars free-agent receiver Mike Sims-Walker expressed interest recently in joining the Bears.  According to an NFL source close to Sims-Walker, the Bears are interested too and the sides are in contact.  A five-year veteran, Sims-Walker (6-2, 214 pounds), caught 122 passes for 1,647 yards and 14 touchdown in three seasons with the Jaguars. Sims-Walker missed the first two years of his career because of knee injuries.  The Jaguars drafted Sims-Walker in the third round in 2007, and the receiver showed tremendous promise as a rookie. But lingering knee issues from college sidelined him.  It's unknown whether Sims-Walker's contract expectations are a potential roadblock to the sides striking a deal.  In part because of his injury history, Sims-Walker seeks a one-year deal that would allow him a chance to produce a strong 2011 showing -- if he remains healthy -- before returning to the market to cash in, the source said.

Olsen's trade a bizarre 'business' deal (http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/columns/story?columnist=greenberg_jon&id=6814587)

...I have to think Olsen would have benefitted this offense in 2011. This stinks of the unnecessary talent-for-philosophy sacrifices that plagued the Bears after the Super Bowl.

".... I did everything that I was asked," Olsen told "Chicago's Gamenight" on ESPN 1000. "Playing fullback and pass protection and blocking. That was kind of the wrap going in. I proved all that wrong and showed that I could play every down and did everything I was asked to do. At the end of the day, it just wasn't really a fit. And that's fine. Everyone has their ways of doing things and I have no hard feelings towards it at all and I'm just happy and satisfied that I have the opportunity to go plays somewhere where I feel like I have a better opportunity."

The Bears' offense was dreadful for much of the season, so it's tough to gauge anyone by statistics. With no mini-camps or organized team activities, it seems a little bizarre to make this move and a lot of people are scratching their heads.

Last spring, Martz, mindful of his reputation, said this about Olsen's role: "If there's a [good] player who can't fit a system, then something's wrong & with the system, don't you think? We will give everybody an opportunity to find who they are and how they'll contribute. Everybody will get that opportunity, and Greg will too."

Martz was muzzled in his first season, and wasn't allowed to speak after games, when he might let some heavy criticism slip. Before the NFC championship, he had this to say about Olsen:

"We've asked all our tight ends to take turns at that position of fullback so that takes away from the down-the-field type of thing we'd like Greg to do at times, too," Martz said. "But he's done so many great things for us that allow us to do those things. Unselfishly, he's been willing to do that so we can run the ball so much better. He leads in there. He's at the point of attack as a tight end. We put him out there as a wide receiver. & It's fun to have that kind of talent and intelligence and unselfishness to be able to utilize him in so many different ways like I've never done before."

It's fun, sure, but as we know, this is a business. So it goes.  As Olsen wrapped up with ESPN 1000 Thursday night, the hosts brought up that the Bears and Panthers play this season.

"I think week four," Olsen said.

Consider it circled.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 28, 2011, 10:46:02 pm
Another starting guard cut

Chiefs release long-time OG Waters (http://www.profootballweekly.com/2011/07/28/chiefs-release-long-time-og-waters)

Kinda odd, compared to years past, that the Bears have only had 2 draft picks signed while others are seemingly getting their draft classes/top picks wrapped up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 02:10:24 am

I also was disgusted at how Olsen never punished tacklers and went down easily when a DB much smaller then him threw a arm out and hit his leg.  He has been a the biggest wussy when it came to being tackled.  He would fall down when a fly ran into his thigh.  Plus he fumbled WAY too much.

Unbelievable comment.

Olsen lost 3 fumbles in his 4 year career with the Bears...2 of which were in that one Carolina game a couple years back.
The guy was basically ignored as a receiver in genius Martz' offense but no wideout had more TDs than Olsen last season and Olsen out performed every WR on our roster in the playoffs.

Olsen was a committed blocker and caused matchup problems with defenses.  He may not have been a guy that ran through defenders but more importantly he had speed to run by them.  I heard the same bullshit about Matt Forte being a soft runner too.

But hey, enjoy that new TE we got from the Pittsburgh, I'm sure you all can cream in your jeans as he runs over a linebacker for a 5 yard gain, while defenses commit their safeties to double cover our wide receivers.

This team was so close to going to the Super Bowl and we give up a receiving threat for a draft choice next year? 

Let's hope Kellen Davis can take up the slack.  Despite his size he does have decent receiving skills...oh I forgot, Martz is our OC which means he'll be asked to block DEs one on one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on July 29, 2011, 02:26:53 am
And no mention is made of the fact that Olsen is another first round draft pick no longer playing for the Bears.  Stellar job Angelo!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 29, 2011, 05:59:43 am
Bears expected to sign WR Roy Williams
(http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2011/07/bears_expected_to_sign_wr_roy_williams.html)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 29, 2011, 06:07:57 am
From the Daily Herald (http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20110728/sports/707289630/)

The departure of Olsen leaves offensive lineman Chris Williams as the only first-round pick on the roster and under contract in 10 years of drafts by general manager Jerry Angelo. And Williams might not even be a starter this year.  This year’s first-round pick, Wisconsin offensive tackle Gabe Carimi, had not agreed to terms as of Thursday night.  The former Angelo first-round picks who have washed out as Bears include: offensive tackle Marc Colombo (2002), defensive lineman Michael Haynes and quarterback Rex Grossman (2003), defensive tackle Tommie Harris (2004) and running back Cedric Benson (2005).  The Bears did not have first-round picks in 2006, ’09 or ’10.

If they lose Graham, you can close the book on the entire 2007 draft.  Pathetic!

1 31 (31) Greg Olsen TE Miami (FL)
2 30 (62) Daniel Bazuin DE Central Michigan
3 29 (93) Garrett Wolfe RB Northern Illinois
3 30 (94) Michael Okwo OLB Stanford
4 31 (130) Josh Beekman G Boston College
5 30 (167) Kevin Payne S Louisiana-Monroe
5 31 (168) Corey Graham CB New Hampshire
7 11 (221) Trumaine McBride CB Mississippi
7 31 (241) Aaron Brant T Iowa State
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 07:06:29 am
A 3rd for Olsen is better than I thought he was worth.

I think we made out OK, too. Tony Gonzales only brought a 2nd and he's a future HOFer.

Bottom line is, the boys in Halas Hall didn't want to pay Olsen big money if he wasn't going to fit into the current OC's plans.

I just hope that after Martz exits next year and a[nother] new offensive system is installed that we're not wishing we had Olsen back.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 07:13:47 am
"Olsen was a committed blocker"   Looks like Dallas was drinking the koolaide when he wrote this.  How many blocks have you seen Olsen whiff on?  I have seen more than enough.  And the next time he runs over or thru a tackle will be his first.  Goes down way to easy on contact.  He is fast and fairly good catching the ball, but still a pu=ssy and I am glad to see him go.  Some paper wrote that he and Cutler had fantastic Chemistry in River North, and less than that at Soldier Field.  Agree.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 07:15:48 am
PFT reporting Bears have signed Roy Williams.

We'll see how this goes.  He had a Pro Bowl year with the Lions while Martz was there, but he was a total embarrassment in Big D. Chicago is not the place where players usually turn their careers around (and especially WRs), but if there's ever time to hope for an exception to that rule, it's now.

Re Daneial Manning, I think he was the victim of his own slow development. When you draft a guy in the 2nd round you expect him to be starting and making significant contributions well before the end of his rookie contract.  Manning really only appeared to be finding his way for the first time, last season.  If we had been getting the production we saw from him last year a couple years sooner, I think the Halas Hall crew would have been a lot more willing to put big money on the table to keep him around.

Now we have GOT to go out and get Brian Waters. And extend Matt Forte. Getting Carimi signed wouldn't be a bad idea either. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 07:29:45 am
I think we will miss Mannings kick returns more than his saftey play. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 07:33:36 am
If its true that the Bears signed Roy Williams then a big red "X" goes right on Mike Martz's chest, because if he fails or he just doesnt improve much, you can put the blame right there and on Daryl Drake too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 07:39:18 am
I think we will miss Mannings kick returns more than his saftey play.

I wonder if Hester goes back to doing double duty on both punt and kick returns ... especially now with Williams in the fold as the de facto #1 WR?

Lots of people laughing at the Bears for the decisions of the last two days...  especially re Olsen and Williams. No question this is now 100% Mike Martz' offense, with the skill players of his choosing.  If the offense fails again this year it's totally on him and he should bear the consequences.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 07:43:08 am
BBAO: Bears' big WR is Roy Williams
July, 29, 2011 Jul 297:32AM ETEmail Print Comments58 By Kevin SeifertWe're Black and Blue All Over:

I guess we can't be surprised that between the hours of 11 p.m. ET and 7 a.m. ET, we had another significant free-agent agreement here in the NFC North. ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Chicago Bears will sign free-agent receiver Roy Williams, who was recently released by the Dallas Cowboys.

Free agents can officially sign their contracts with teams starting at 6 p.m. ET Friday. They'll be able to report to training camp and attend classroom sessions and meetings but can't be on the practice field until Aug. 4.

Williams is a rare combination: A big receiver who gets the seal of approval from offensive coordinator Mike Martz, who typically prefers smaller-sized receivers. Williams played two seasons under Martz when both were with the Detroit Lions, and they were the two most productive years of Williams' career.

We'll have to see where he is mentally and physically four years later but, Bears fans, after years of discussion, your team finally has a big receiver.

I'll have more a bit later Friday morning.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 07:46:07 am
I don't know what Roy Williams' head was like in Detroit but he was quite the diva in Dallas.

If Martz and Lovie can't manage his attitude I see a major blow-up between him and Cutler within the first 3 games.

What I can't understand is that he got knocked in Dallas for bad route running, too many drops and being soft over the middle. Things that Martz usually doesn't tolerate (just ask Devin Aromashadu).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 07:48:28 am
All I have to say about Roy Williams is he better not be like he was in Dallas because he had a very good QB in Dallas to get him the ball.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 29, 2011, 07:52:03 am
Why not give Williams a try. He's 6'3, gives Cutler a big target. The guy is 29, should have a couple years left..

I'm divided on the Olsen trade, I like the guy, but I also agree with boogie, he was soft..

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 07:52:25 am
Interesting thing about Williams is that he has never had more than 8 TDs in a season and that includes his Pro Bowl year when he had over 1,300 yards but only 7 TDs.

So, Bears fans thinking this guy is gonna be our red zone savior may want to lower their expecations.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 07:54:14 am
Now we have GOT to go out and get Brian Waters. And extend Matt Forte. Getting Carimi signed wouldn't be a bad idea either.

We need that OG, definitely. And Please cut Chris Williams too. We need Carimi and a happy Forte too
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 29, 2011, 07:54:31 am
he had 8 TD's in DET with Kitna throwing him the ball, I don't remember how good their line was.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 29, 2011, 07:55:26 am
on the Olsen trade, I like it. I doubt Olsen was coming back, either the money or Martz I think he would have chosen greener pastures and we got something for him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 07:57:12 am
Very interested to see the contract terms for Williams.

After that disaster in Dallas, anything over a couple mil a year is too much.  He's a guy that definitely has a lot to prove and his compensation should reflect that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 08:03:11 am
Very interested to see the contract terms for Williams.

After that disaster in Dallas, anything over a couple mil a year is too much.  He's a guy that definitely has a lot to prove and his compensation should reflect that.

His contract should definitely be based on production
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 08:06:05 am
on the Olsen trade, I like it. I doubt Olsen was coming back, either the money or Martz I think he would have chosen greener pastures and we got something for him.

Good take. I agree, I dont believe he was coming back either and that threat might have been brought up during his meeting last year when Martz was hired.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 08:25:28 am
So our only unsigned pick is Carimi. Come on Cliff Stein, get it in gear and get him in to camp.  ;) 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 08:29:00 am
Three things need to happen within the next 48 hours:

1) Get Carimi signed.

2) Open up the checkbook and sign the best FA OG out there.  Brian Waters would be my pick even though he's pretty old.

3) Get Forte extended so he doesn't hold out or come into camp with a bad attitude.  This is more important than getting Kreutz signed, IMO.

Stretch goal:  Get a good veteran DT in here as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 08:41:38 am
Interesting comment that we offered Willie Colon $32mil but he stayed with the Steelers for $29mil.  Hmmm.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 29, 2011, 08:49:16 am
May have been more money up front..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 09:00:38 am
Interesting comment that we offered Willie Colon $32mil but he stayed with the Steelers for $29mil.  Hmmm.

I have heard rumors that some big-name players have turned the Bears down this week.  I'm sure they will never let that news leak out of Halas Hall but that wouldn't surprise me one bit. The Bears have a great tradition, good facilities (not counting Soldier Field) and one of the best fan bases anywhere... but Lovie and the front office are a joke and that's known throughout the league.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 29, 2011, 09:12:18 am
but Lovie and the front office are a joke and that's known throughout the league.
I know Angelo makes some stupid draft picks sometimes but I think most players really like playing for Lovie. I mean we have been able to get most FA's that we target. we have also done a pretty good job of keeping our own core players together.

I expect Colon played the bears to get a better contract at home kind of like Kreutz did (and will likely do again).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 09:20:45 am
Should be very intersting to see what happens with Kruetz and the 9ers. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 09:30:53 am
Couple of interesting things pulled from various rumor / chat boards:

1) Speculation that in addition to Roy Williams the Bears may be targeting one more big WR...  names frequently floated are Braylon Edwards (yuk) or Mike Sims-Walker (meh).  This would create quite a logjam at big WR with Fantuz already in the mix as well.

2) Rumblings that the Bears may be trying to work a deal for Antonio "OctoDad" Cromartie.

Sorry to say, no chatter about an impending FA OG signing or any resolution to the Kreutz situation.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 29, 2011, 09:38:10 am
he had 8 TD's in DET with Kitna throwing him the ball, I don't remember how good their line was.

Their line was atrocious.  Martz was never reigned in at Detroit.  Therefore, they continued to constantly chuck and duck whether they were down 21 or up 10 with 3 minutes left in the 4th.  Plenty of stats were had between Kitna and Roy during those days.

It wouldn't surprise me if some big names dismissed some offers from Halas.  OTOH, the media is so desperate for nuggets, just so much as a phone conversation from a "league source" will be posted ASAP.  My guess is 1) they were low balled and felt that the Bears were not serious and were just gauging the market and 2) if the Bears truly wanted someone, they will go all out and get him at any cost and as quickly as possible (i.e. Peppers) because everyone in the league will know to the point that another team may sneak up to raise the price even more for that player.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 09:40:57 am
I dont believe Conte is signed as well as Carimi. I cant believe with only 5 to sign and we still cant get 2 signed before camp opens.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 29, 2011, 09:41:36 am
Bears sign another ex Cowgirl WR Sam Hurd.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 29, 2011, 09:42:50 am
Conte and Paea are signed.  Carimi is the only one left.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 09:45:38 am
I didnt see anything of Conte signing. Paea I did. I think I posted that
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on July 29, 2011, 09:53:31 am
Bears sign another ex Cowgirl WR Sam Hurd.

I still think we should consider Plaxico for our redzone guy
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 09:54:51 am
"Olsen was a committed blocker"   Looks like Dallas was drinking the koolaide when he wrote this.  How many blocks have you seen Olsen whiff on?  I have seen more than enough.  And the next time he runs over or thru a tackle will be his first.  Goes down way to easy on contact.  He is fast and fairly good catching the ball, but still a pu=ssy and I am glad to see him go.  Some paper wrote that he and Cutler had fantastic Chemistry in River North, and less than that at Soldier Field.  Agree.

Olsen's a ****?  Nice...

Did you like those catches Olsen made in the first GB game last year, especially that one near the goal line?  How about the big reception against the Cowboys?  And in the playoff game against the Seahawks?  Olsen the few times his number was called came up with a lot of critical 3rd down catches last year.

Olsen came into the league as a receiving TE and struggled as a blocker with the Bears.  But last year with Martz emphasis on blocking from the TE position Olsen committed himself to blocking and ended up being a very capable blocker responsible for springing Forte on a lot of big runs.  Now he won't be mistaken for the most of the big clumsy oofs the Bears have put out at the position for most of the last 30 years, but he got the job done.

Unfortunately, for Olsen he got stuck with an offensive coordinator who was inflexible and unable to incorporate Olsen's strengths into his offense.   Kind of like he did with Aromashodu.

And BTW, do you think Vernon Davis, Tony Gonzalez, and Antonio Gates etc  are known for their blocking?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 10:00:23 am
Sam Hurd signs with the Chicago Bears
July, 29, 2011 Jul 299:47AM CTEmail Print Comments1 By Calvin WatkinsSAN ANTONIO -- Wide receiver Sam Hurd has agreed to terms on a contact to play for the Chicago Bears.

The Cowboys signed Hurd as an undrafted free agent in 2006 from Northern Illinois.

Hurd, a San Antonio native, always had a goal of being a receiver, but he made his mark with the Cowboys on special teams.

A special teams captain last year, Hurd finished second on the team with 21 tackles. In 2009, Hurd led the Cowboys with 19 special teams tackles.

"I'm excited about this, no hard feelings towards Dallas," Hurd told ESPNDallas. "It's a job and it had nothing to do with the Cowboys. I would love to play for the Cowboys but I've always loved the city of Chicago and what the Bears stood for."

Hurd brings speed and experience to the Bears receiving corps. When Hurd signed with the Cowboys he was tutored on how to run routes, catch passes and be a professional from Terrell Owens and Terry Glenn. In later years he learned how to get better from Roy Williams.

Still, Hurd couldn't surpass, Patrick Crayton and eventually Miles Austin on the depth chart. Last season when the Cowboys drafted Dez Bryant, it was the writing on the wall for several players including Crayton, who was eventually traded to San Diego. Hurd asked for a trade as well, but it didn't happen. Kevin Ogletree's emergence also complicated things for Hurd, who couldn't get enough playing time on offense.

The Cowboys did make Hurd an offer to stay, but the Bears made a commitment to make him a wide receiver.

"I hear great things about Chicago," Hurd said. "I know Lovie is a great mind and I hear great things about Mike Martz. I'm excited and my mind and heart is open and I get a chance to play receiver. That's all I can ask for. If the other guy is better than me, hey, I'm all about team and I'm happy for that guy. But if I can compete for a spot I will do that."
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on July 29, 2011, 10:01:10 am
Very disapointed in the Olsen trade.

This really detracts from the passing game.

We now have an even more very average receiving corps.  (pronounced "core" Barack)

Maybe they will target Zack Miller from the Raiders or the older Todd heap released by the Ravens.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 10:03:08 am
So Sam Hurd is basically a ST ACE!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 10:16:03 am

Yes, Sam Hurd will basically take the spot of Rashied Davis as the Trib points out.  He's bigger than Rashied though not as quick.

As for Roy Williams, if anyone here thinks he's going to be our #1 receiver I think they are mistaken.  He's got nice size and speed but is very inconsistent and he drops way too many balls.  He was having a pretty good season last year early on but then the Cowboys started emphasizing Dez Bryant more and Williams disappeared.

I think what I like best is that Cutler will now have a big guy that can go after some of his throws rather than just watch the other team make a play on a ball that's not perfectly thrown.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 29, 2011, 10:22:44 am
Guaranteed contract could be hold up for Bears, Carimi (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-guaranteed-contract-could-be-hold-up-for-bears-carimi-20110729,0,1675062.story)

In a typical year we see the contracts completed for the players near the bottom of the first round before the highest players get deals done.  For the most part, it’s going in reverse order this year and there could be one potential hangup for the Chicago Bears getting a deal done for their first rounder Gabe Carimi. That’s because teams at the bottom of the round near where the Bears are at No. 29 are battling right now with agents about fully guaranteeing these four-year contracts.  The revamped system to pay the first-round draft picks has put a huge cash hit on the draft picks with the promise of a quicker path to free agency for them. According to a league source, there is a big fight at the bottom of the round right now because teams are trying to not fully guarantee all of the contracts. That’s got the agents hacked off, and the NFL is hopeful that contracts will not be fully guaranteed through the entire round to avoid pay for first-round picks escalating like it did in the past decade.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 10:26:26 am
Hurd should be a definite upgrade over Rasheed.  I know he's got some serious wheels...  maybe he steps into the KR void created by the loss of Manning. 

As a WR, he brings enough skills to put some pressure on Johnny Knox which may not be a bad thing as it appeared last year at times that Knox was giving less than maximum effort.

As for Roy Williams, he's an odd bird.  A big, well-built guy who nevertheless is soft over the middle, and one of those guys who will make a circus catch on one play (I still remember the one he snagged against the Bears when he was a Lion), and then drop the next one that hits him right in the hands.  I hope he can get his career back on track with the Bears but I agree with Dallasbear in thinking we would do well to keep our expectations low.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 10:31:06 am
Maybe they will target Zack Miller from the Raiders or the older Todd heap released by the Ravens.

Nope. Martz doesn't need nor want a pass catching TE.  The closest thing we have to that now is Kellen Davis. Whatever other TEs make it onto the roster behind him are there for blocking and STs only.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 29, 2011, 10:36:59 am
I hope he can get his career back on track with the Bears but I agree with Dallasbear in thinking we would do well to keep our expectations low.

Agreed.  I want to know what the damn contract terms are!

Martz reportedly gets his man in mercurial Williams (http://www.csnchicago.com/07/29/11/Martz-reportedly-gets-his-man-in-mercuri/landing_insider_john_moon_mullin.html?blockID=544546&feedID=626)

If there is one concern it is that Williams has played 16 games just once in his career, in 2006 when he went to the Pro Bowl after catching a career-best 82 passes for 1,310 yards (best in the NFC), seven TDs and an average of 16 yards per catch. But he fell off to an injury-plagued 2008 in which he started just four games, played in five and finished with 17 passes caught. He then was dealt to the Cowboys.  But he failed to establish himself as the No. 1 receiver with Tony Romo, with 38 catches in 2009 and 37 last season, but with five TD catches in 2010 and seven in 2009. That was not sufficient for Jerry Jones, however, and Williams was informed earlier this week that he would be released.  Williams is regarded as a classic underachiever, with a curious reputation for not working hard but believing that he actually was, according to a source familiar with his play.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 10:37:28 am
Bears ink deals with two draft picks; only Carimi unsigned
     
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune staff reporter
 
7:53 a.m. CDT, July 29, 2011
And then there was one.

The Chicago Bears signed defensive tackle Stephen Paea to a four-year contract late Thursday night and Friday morning they announced safety Chris Conte has also come to terms on a four-year deal meaning first-round draft pick Gabe Carimi is the only remaining unsigned pick.

Paea, a second rounder from Oregon State, is expected to compete for a spot in the rotation immediately. Conte, the club's third-round pick from Cal, will work behind Major Wright at free safety and should vie for a role on special teams.

Although camp officially opens Friday at Olivet Nazarene University in Bourbonnais, Ill., the first practice isn't until 2:30 p.m. Saturday. As long as Carimi is signed, sealed and in a helmet by then, he will not have missed anything.

First-round draft picks continue to get deals done around the league, so there isn't expected to be a holdup. It should be another active and busy day.

bmbiggs@tribune.com

Twitter @BradBiggs
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 10:43:53 am
Hurd should be a definite upgrade over Rasheed.  I know he's got some serious wheels...  maybe he steps into the KR void created by the loss of Manning. 

As a WR, he brings enough skills to put some pressure on Johnny Knox which may not be a bad thing as it appeared last year at times that Knox was giving less than maximum effort.


Sam Hurd is strictly a possession receiver and was never used by the Cowboys as a return guy...punts or kick offs.  Think 5th WR who dresses on Sunday but rarely plays on offense - special teamer.  Maybe even a bit of downgrade to RAshied since Rashied could come in now and then and return kicks.

I'm really concerned with our STs this season.  Corey Graham was a stud...Garrett Wolfe, Rashied Davis, Brian Iwuh, and Rod Wilson - all big contributors all gone.   And if Kellen Davis starts at TE he leaves STs too.

 Who replaces these guys?  I think we've really taken for granted this team's ability to cover kicks and punts...but there I go drinking more Kool Aid.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 10:49:40 am
I mentioned earlier that it looks like these UDFAs will have to step up and make this club.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 10:53:32 am
Sam Hurd is strictly a possession receiver and was never used by the Cowboys as a return guy...punts or kick offs.  Think 5th WR who dresses on Sunday but rarely plays on offense - special teamer.  Maybe even a bit of downgrade to RAshied since Rashied could come in now and then and return kicks.

I'm really concerned with our STs this season.  Corey Graham was a stud...Garrett Wolfe, Rashied Davis, Brian Iwuh, and Rod Wilson - all big contributors all gone.   And if Kellen Davis starts at TE he leaves STs too.

 Who replaces these guys?  I think we've really taken for granted this team's ability to cover kicks and punts...but there I go drinking more Kool Aid.

No question the pressure is on Toub again to put together some competitive ST units out of a lot of new parts. The heavy investment in our new big-legged punter may have been made knowing that coverage could be an issue at least in the early going.  And/or to hedge bets against the continued snails-pace development of our offense.

Have the departures of either Wolfe or Graham been officially announced?  I hope Graham in particular doesn't wind up on another team in the division...  he has the goods to play CB in the NFL and I don't know why Lovie could never see that. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 11:07:56 am
My biggest concern at this point... still...  is the OL.

Carimi's not signed, the Kreutz situation is still in limbo and there appears to be no urgency in picking up a veteran FA OG even though several good ones are there for the taking.

The result being that on the eve of training camp, we are arguably in worse shape at OL this year than we were the same point last season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest118 on July 29, 2011, 11:13:24 am
WTF do you let Olsen go....I a year "were need to address the TE postion".
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 11:17:06 am
WTF do you let Olsen go....I a year "were need to address the TE postion".

We all need to hope Kellen Davis can continue developing into his considerable potential. If that happens, we may still have the TE we need even if/when Martz departs after this year.  If not, then we're back to square one and that probably means our 2nd round pick in 2012 going for a TE.

Meanwhile, I'm hoping for an epic fail by the Panthers this year to push that 3rd round pick up as high as possible. With those QBs they have I think the chances of that are pretty good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 11:22:47 am
STs is a concern but O-line is easily the biggest concern:

Webb at LT is huge?  He played it in college but not the pros.  Carimi at RT is another unknown.  Thankfully, we have Omiyale who can competently replace either.

OG is a pile of unknowns.  Aside from Garza there just a bunch of young inexperienced guys:  Louis, Chris Williams, Edwin Williams, Johan Asiata,  Herman Johnson and whoever else they can find off the street.

And of course Kreutz' situation.

Other concerns:  starting SLB, pass rusher either at DT or DE, TE and possibly LCB and backup safety
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 11:26:15 am
STs is a concern but O-line is easily the biggest concern:

Webb at LT is huge?  He played it in college but not the pros.  Carimi at RT is another unknown.  Thankfully, we have Omiyale who can competently replace either.

OG is a pile of unknowns.  Aside from Garza there just a bunch of young inexperienced guys:  Louis, Chris Williams, Edwin Williams, Johan Asiata,  Herman Johnson and whoever else they can find off the street.

And of course Kreutz' situation.

Other concerns:  starting SLB, pass rusher either at DT or DE, TE and possibly LCB and backup safety

Yup...  sure doesn't feel like Angelo and the boys have been as productive with their time as a lot of other teams have been this week.

They've brought in a lot of UDFA camp fodder, but they've also punched plenty of holes in the roster... and, other than WR and a couple of ST players, haven't done much to improve it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on July 29, 2011, 11:38:45 am
They signed Williams according to Tri
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on July 29, 2011, 11:40:06 am
The fact that the terms of the Roy Williams deal have been so tightly guarded makes me think we overpaid.  Giving franchise WR money to a guy in as little demand as he was, would bring Halas Hall in for a torrent of ridicule well beyond what they've already sustained this week.

If Jerry & Company had gotten a steal they'd be broadcasting it from the rooftops.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 29, 2011, 12:16:54 pm
Losing Olsen and getting Williams is probably a wash.  At least we got a third round pick for Oslen.

You guys **** when we let players walk for nothing then **** when Angello gets a third for Oslen in his last year of his contract.  Which way do you want it?

Olsen was never anything special.  He was an ok receiver and a so so blocker and he never broke a single tackle or punished anyone who tackled him.  He played so soft you are better off with a receiver then him on the field.  He had 5 TD's last year that is pretty average for a starting TE in this league.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 29, 2011, 12:21:46 pm
I'm satisfied with the Olsen trade.
I expect we are in play for a few of the bigger names and those guys are waiting until tonight to make a decision.
I'm expecting an above average OL, maybe not a top tier guy but an upgrade.
I would also be surprised if we don't land another DL and DB to throw into the mix.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 29, 2011, 02:01:32 pm
Carimi is in the fold

According to Jensen (http://twitter.com/#!/skjensen/status/97009151812698113), Anthony Adams has resigned for 2 years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 29, 2011, 02:42:55 pm
FWIW, it's been reported that Roach and Forte are in camp today.

Another UDFA tackle Mike Lamphear (http://www.goleathernecks.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=50026&SPID=4963&DB_OEM_ID=12000&ATCLID=205214191) for a tryout.  I hope his weight (http://www.goleathernecks.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=12000&ATCLID=788544) is a typo.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on July 29, 2011, 02:45:47 pm
I don't understand dealing Olson.  Martz might not think highly of the tight end position but Olson was the bestplayer this team had at one of its weakest positions. Martz needs to adjust to the talent he has. If he's such a genius, he can find a way to draw a TE pattern.

Agree with you and Dallasbear about Olsen.  He made some clutch catches all while he was here and was a valuable part of the offense.  BUT NO the Guru didn't like him nor did he like Aromashadu.  Nice going Martz.

And Dallas said something else that I agree with (finally) and that was Olsen wasn't a fumbler.  He's gone now and let's see how Martz turns this offense into a juggernaut with Roy Williams as the lead receiver.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 29, 2011, 03:04:29 pm
FWIW, it's been reported that Roach and Forte are in camp today.

Another UDFA tackle Mike Lamphear (http://www.goleathernecks.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=50026&SPID=4963&DB_OEM_ID=12000&ATCLID=205214191) for a tryout.  I hope his weight (http://www.goleathernecks.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=12000&ATCLID=788544) is a typo.

looks like a TE to me!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 03:08:33 pm
I think I read that they promised Hurd he could play WR, so I dont think he is going to be happy relegated to ST only. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 03:13:14 pm
Ok with Adams and Carimi signed, Forte in camp and Roach around, all that is missing is Kruetz, a FA OG, some DBs and LBs for special teams.  Feels good to have football back. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 29, 2011, 03:16:40 pm
They are going to miss Manning on special teams.  If we had never had Hester, we would be worshiping Manning's ability to return kicks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 03:18:25 pm
Two good articles today in the Trib talking about Olsen.  Pompeii quotes an opposing personnel director that called Olsen a top 10 TE talent in the league and said '"We had a hard time matching up with him.   You always have to account for him, and when they play two tight ends and extend him, you don't know if you should play nickel or base. He could compromise your defense."

And Haugh painted the other picture of a talented guy who would never be fully utilized in Martz offense but would want to be compensated as that top 10 talent.

That part of the argument I can understand.   And getting a high 3rd rounder isn't so bad considering Martz would under utilize him again.

But what I can't understand the soft label many of you have attributed to Olsen.   Bring back Keith Jennings.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 29, 2011, 03:25:28 pm
dallas, to be a 6'4, 250lb TE, he went down too easy after the catch from guys much smaller than him. I think that was his biggest knock.
He was a matchup issue that we never took full advantage of but he went down too easy.
He was also usually sure handed.
While not any dominate blocker he was willing to stick his head in there and got a lot better in that department.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 03:27:32 pm
I think I read that they promised Hurd he could play WR, so I dont think he is going to be happy relegated to ST only.

I doubt any Bear coach promised Hurd anything but the chance to compete for a WR job.  He's not better than Knox, Bennet, Williams, or Hester.  But there could be situations during the season where he might come in and be asked to make some plays - he is tall. 

But right now I see him as an insurance police and a special teamer.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 03:33:55 pm
dallas, to be a 6'4, 250lb TE, he went down too easy after the catch from guys much smaller than him. I think that was his biggest knock.
He was a matchup issue that we never took full advantage of but he went down too easy.
He was also usually sure handed.
While not any dominate blocker he was willing to stick his head in there and got a lot better in that department.

Maybe so, but think of the times he was able to outrun/outmaneuver defenders and gain yardage BEFORE contact.    Not to mention the number of times he could catch a ball over the top of the defender.

You guys are taking a minor fault and magnifying it beyond reason. We know Forte can't run inside, Cutler throws too many picks, Knox doesn't fight for balls, Hester disappears, our offensive line....I don't have enough space in this box to list all their faults.   

If your point is that Olsen wasn't the perfect TE.  Agreed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 03:37:27 pm
They are going to miss Manning on special teams.  If we had never had Hester, we would be worshiping Manning's ability to return kicks.

Manning returned kicks like his hair was on fire.  But with the new KO rules and the fact that we have Hester and Knox to return kicks he was deemed expendable.

If he was a better defender than he could have stuck, but we drafted Major Wright to replace him.  Manning had all the tools but just didn't have the instincts of a FS which is why they had to play him closer to the LOS and out of position as a SS.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 03:47:31 pm
Here you go Dallas, just for you:

Still, Hurd couldn't surpass, Patrick Crayton and eventually Miles Austin on the depth chart. Last season when the Cowboys drafted Dez Bryant, it was the writing on the wall for several players including Crayton, who was eventually traded to San Diego. Hurd asked for a trade as well, but it didn't happen. Kevin Ogletree's emergence also complicated things for Hurd, who couldn't get enough playing time on offense.
 
The Cowboys did make Hurd an offer to stay, but the Bears made a commitment to make him a wide receiver.
 


I think that last sentence means they told him he could play WR.  And lets not forget all the passes that hit G-reg Olsen on the hands that he dropped.  The romanticizing of Olsen makes me wonder who he lived next door to. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 29, 2011, 03:48:33 pm
Nav - I agree with Dallas.  Olson had flaws, the worst of which was that he didn't break some tackles that others might have broken.

But you have to look at the entire package.  Olsen was a unique talent at tight end as a receiver.  He had moves to get himself open, speed to outrun many defenders, and hands to catch most balls.  I would rather have a guy that catches the ball 25 yards townfield and then gets tackled than a guy that breaks a tackle 10 yards downfield and is tackled 15 yards downfield.  And as stated above, he made it extremely difficult to defend against him.  If you assign a cover guy to him, you leave yourself more vulnerable to the run, and if you put in a linebacker-type against him, you leave yourself open to the long pass.

Olsen was not the perfect tight end.  But unless Davis really comes on this year, he was by far the best we had, and one of the better in the league.

If the system was not going to make proper use of him, then blame the system, not the player.  Even in the current system, the underutilized Olsen was a major asset, especially with a subpar receiving corps that we generally had.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 03:55:26 pm
Here you go Dallas, just for you:

Still, Hurd couldn't surpass, Patrick Crayton and eventually Miles Austin on the depth chart. Last season when the Cowboys drafted Dez Bryant, it was the writing on the wall for several players including Crayton, who was eventually traded to San Diego. Hurd asked for a trade as well, but it didn't happen. Kevin Ogletree's emergence also complicated things for Hurd, who couldn't get enough playing time on offense.
 
The Cowboys did make Hurd an offer to stay, but the Bears made a commitment to make him a wide receiver.

I think that last sentence means they told him he could play WR.  And lets not forget all the passes that hit G-reg Olsen on the hands that he dropped.  The romanticizing of Olsen makes me wonder who he lived next door to.

Wow!  I guess Hurd is going to be starting for us then.  It will be Roy Williams and Hurd who will put both  Bennett and Knox on the bench.

I said Hurd will get opportunities to play WR just as Davis did last year....but sparingly.   Even more so if we have any kind of injuries at the position.

Have you ever seen this guy play?  I have.  He's a decent talent but I just don't think he's an NFL starter.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 03:59:17 pm
Sorry, I never said anything about starting, way to jump to a conclusion.  All I said was they told him he could play WR. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 04:08:31 pm

Play WR..as opposed to telling him he could play long snapper?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on July 29, 2011, 04:12:42 pm
Olsen was healthy for every game too, wasn't he?

Remember how Martz' receivers in St. Loo hit the ground immediately after catching a ball?

I hope Olsen breaks out in NC - Bears' loss on that trade
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 04:25:26 pm
You know Dallas you are an intelligent guy.  How about as opposed to playing just ST.  I know it sucks when you make a mistake, I make them all the time. I just dont keep going on and on about them.   ;) 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 04:34:21 pm

boogie,

Corey Graham is a UFA.  I guarentee there are going to be teams (maybe even the Bears) that will sit down with him and his agent in his living room and tell him that they want him to play cornerback. 

But in their mind they are thinking...special team gunner.

We lost Aromashodu and Roy Williams takes his spot as I think Hurd takes Rashied Davis' roster spot.

Just don't think Hurd is going to make a big impact on offense - I'd love to be wrong seeing how he's an ex-Huskie like myself.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 04:45:05 pm
looks like a TE to me!

He definitely looks like TE material
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 29, 2011, 04:47:22 pm
Glad Carimi and Adams are signed. Now lets get Graham and Kreutz signed
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on July 29, 2011, 04:50:10 pm
Gotta believe Kreutz would take a home-town discount - especially if SF is the alternative
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 04:56:12 pm

Corey Wooten to get some competition:  http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-looking-to-bring-in-former-6thround-pick-gholston-20110729,0,1381747.story

This guy is more Alex Brown size than Idonijie/Peppers but I think it would be worth it giving him at least a shot.  We sure could use another pass rusher regardless of position.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 05:11:23 pm
boogie,

Corey Graham is a UFA.  I guarentee there are going to be teams (maybe even the Bears) that will sit down with him and his agent in his living room and tell him that they want him to play cornerback. 

But in their mind they are thinking...special team gunner.

We lost Aromashodu and Roy Williams takes his spot as I think Hurd takes Rashied Davis' roster spot.

Just don't think Hurd is going to make a big impact on offense - I'd love to be wrong seeing how he's an ex-Huskie like myself.


Well as one ex-Huskie to another, I knew there was something I liked about you.  ;) 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 29, 2011, 05:16:01 pm
Can they please sign a FA OG or OT please?  We have to get some more help on the o-line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 29, 2011, 05:32:01 pm
Every special teams player has an official position listed in the depth charts.  A great many very seldom actually play in that position over the course of the season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on July 29, 2011, 05:48:38 pm
Maybe this is why they traded Olsen...

Quote
Jermichael Finley, TE
Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images
This was the most painful player to write about.

The potential for Jermichael Finley is absolutely stunning, but that potential will be somewhere else in 2012.

If—and this is a huge if right now—Finley can stay healthy for an entire season, he will absolutely separate himself as the best tight end in football. It won't be easy to let Finley go, but the amount of money he will want will be too much for Green Bay.

Remember that Green Bay drafted two tight ends back in April, and D.J. Williams has all the tools to be a special player.

Finley would have certainly driven up the cost of TE's in next years FA class.  Might as well just go out and sign Finley if that were the case.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on July 29, 2011, 07:15:46 pm
nice to talk football again. Bears haven't exactly set the world on fire on signings, is what the Bears have really that good?  Vernon from the Jets? really?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 29, 2011, 07:24:28 pm
Keep in mind, Dallas is still upset over Walt Harris..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 29, 2011, 08:39:36 pm
I just think most folks figure that Olsen wouldn't be back next year, they might as well get something for him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 29, 2011, 08:51:03 pm
I want at least one if not two Free agent signings for the O-line.  I am getting piisssed they have done nothing there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 29, 2011, 08:54:29 pm
Vernon Gholston is a Chicago Bear

 Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on July 29, 2011, 7:42 PM EDT
 

The Bears’ somewhat wacky start to the offseason continues.
 
Vernon Gholston will join Roy Williams in the windy city after signing a one-year contract, the team announced Friday.
 
We’re having a little fun here, but it’s a fine gamble.  If anyone can coax production out of a pass rusher, it’s Bears defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli.
 
Gholston likely signed for the league minimum salary or close to it.  There’s no guarantee he will even make the roster.
 
Chicago also announced they reached agreement with their first-round pick, tackle Gabe Carimi.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 29, 2011, 09:30:40 pm
Keep in mind, Dallas is still upset over Walt Harris..

Don't get me going on Walt Harris.  Do you know that SOB is still floating around the league?  I think he was on the Ravens for part of the year in 2010.

Harris was much maligned as a Bear.  Left Chicago and actually made a couple pro bowls.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 29, 2011, 09:39:14 pm
I really do not understand the love for Greg Olsen.  He was not a bad guy or TE he just was not good.  He was average.  We got a third round pick for an average TE who was in the last year of his contract.  The Panthers are paying him 24 million dollars over 4 years.  That is 6 million dollars a year.  He is NOT worth  6 million dollars a year let alone 6 million dollars a year and a third round pick.

The Bears finally got value out of a guy in a trade. 

Olsen was not  a good blocker and did not break tackles or punish defenders.  He had decent hands.  He was nuetralized when DC's found out he could be defended with a DB.  He still went down easy.

So why not use a big WR that will be faster then Olsen and will have better hands and moves then Olsen.  You lose nothing but you gain speed, moves and hands.  Plus you have another WR on the field instead of a TE that can't block any better then the big WR.

This is what Martz said last year in not so many words. 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 29, 2011, 10:32:44 pm
http://www.chicagobears.com/news/NewsStory.asp?story_id=8001

It has not been talked alot here how we have brought Roach, Hanie, and Anthony Adams back into the fold.  Those are guys who have been here and need to stay here.

If we extend Forte and get a couple guys on the O-line yet in free agency I will be a happy camper.  If we do not sign anyone for the O-line I will not be happy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 29, 2011, 11:10:52 pm
Really we got Vernon Gholston?  Seems not right to me.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on July 30, 2011, 01:02:18 am
Flozell Adams, anyone?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on July 30, 2011, 02:06:19 am
Everyone's getting love except the Oline...again. We need talent there in a huge way.

Ditching Olsen is ok by me. A 3rd is probably about right. He was more a specialized TE. More a reciever than anything,and upgrading the reciever position negates what Olsen brought to the table so it's a wash at worst and a definate upgrade at best. But where's the Oline love?....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on July 30, 2011, 07:13:03 am
I am looking forward to see what Marinelli does with Gholston.  If he can turn him around, that would be a steal, of course he is only signed to a 1 year deal from what I read.  If he produces we might lose him.

On Olsen, I have to say he was underutilized by our system last year.  I agree that if he was in Indy or New England, you would be talking Pro Bowl every year - teams that utilize the TE position.  I guess a 3rd rounder is the best we could do, considering we would just use him the same way this year and then he would walk anyway.

I don't know about Roy Williams.  Was decent in Detroit, and got dealt and disappeared.  I just think if he was all that he would have gotten the ball.  I would have rather gotten Braylon Edwards, he's still out there so you never know. 

As much as we dog all of our players, I think we need Kreutz back asap.  For a center with a minimal injury history, he is still young enough and may have 3 or 4 more decent years.  Sign him to a 2 year contract, pick up another FA guard and let's go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 07:29:36 am
Griz, It looks like we will have to re-sign Kruetz at this point because the cupboard is bare behind him.  They don't seem to be in any hurry to sign his replacement so they HAVe to have him back.  We need a guard at the very least.  I would prefer a guard and a tackle personally.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on July 30, 2011, 07:42:24 am
Olsen flashed talent but really never was huge for us besides a game or two.  I will take the third rounder especially with the deal he got from Panthers.

Man I am absolutely amazed we have gotten NO Oline help yet.  Makes you wonder what the F Angelo watchs on the weekends.  Please, please get some protection for Jay Cutler.  Roy Williams pickup won't matter if Jay doesn't get at least another second to stand up straight on game day. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 08:14:42 am
hiber, Why is it that all the fans can see what is plain as day yet Angelo feels we are fine with what we have each year?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 30, 2011, 08:18:55 am
I really do not understand the love for Greg Olsen.  He was not a bad guy or TE he just was not good.  He was average.  We got a third round pick for an average TE who was in the last year of his contract.  The Panthers are paying him 24 million dollars over 4 years.  That is 6 million dollars a year.  He is NOT worth  6 million dollars a year let alone 6 million dollars a year and a third round pick.

The Bears finally got value out of a guy in a trade. 

Olsen was not  a good blocker and did not break tackles or punish defenders.  He had decent hands.  He was nuetralized when DC's found out he could be defended with a DB.  He still went down easy.

So why not use a big WR that will be faster then Olsen and will have better hands and moves then Olsen.  You lose nothing but you gain speed, moves and hands.  Plus you have another WR on the field instead of a TE that can't block any better then the big WR.

This is what Martz said last year in not so many words.

Other than maybe Forte in the 2nd half, no individual on this offense looked all that great last year. A horrendous offensive line can do that along with Martz playcalling.  You see a lot of inconsistent performances by your skill players when you have an offense ranked 30th in the NFL.

Olsen was a decent blocker and as good as Desmond Clark.  Certainly not a liability.  Our running game wouldn't have clicked if Olsen wasn't a capable blocker.  In fact, if you watched the games you'd see Olsen throwing blocks on numerous Forte runs to the outside.  He really improved that part of the game as the season went along. 

Can't wait to see Roy Williams, Hester, or Knox line up on a DE...I mean, they are probably as good as Olsen blocking, right?

The comment about him getting neutralized with a DB amazes me.  Don't you think that should have opened up our wide receivers?   It really didn't - Martz offense just couldn't really take advantage of teams having to account for Olsen on the field.

Couple our poor offensive line and Martz often questionable playcalling where he often times had Olsen stay in to pass block and its no wonder Olsen looked like an average TE.  Martz neutralized Olsen more than any defense.

I do agree that with Martz at the helm we really have no use for a talented receiving TE.  We should just eliminate the position altogether.  Just go with 6 offensive lineman when we run...and 4 WRs when we pass.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 30, 2011, 08:29:57 am

On Olsen, I have to say he was underutilized by our system last year.  I agree that if he was in Indy or New England, you would be talking Pro Bowl every year - teams that utilize the TE position.  I guess a 3rd rounder is the best we could do, considering we would just use him the same way this year and then he would walk anyway.


Right to the point - good post.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 08:35:22 am
You didn't answer the question.  Do you think Olsen is worth 6 million a year and a high third round draft pick?

Olsen was an average at best blocker and never got to be as good at it as Dez Clark and Clark was never awesome.

If Williams is a willing blocker he will be at least as good as Olsen was as a blocker.  He is big enough.

Hester and Knox are smurfs and will never be good for anything but getting in the way of the defender.

Our problem is the O-line.  Losing Olsen is not going to hurt the O-line at all. 

They talked all day long about Olsen creating mismatches but it never happened on the field.  DB's could keep up with him and tackle him easily.  Show me one time he punished a DB trying to tackle him or ran one over and kept going.  I will give you he was faster then most LBers but so are WR's.

I honestly don't know what he brought to the table you love so much that a big WR can't bring just as well or better.  Now maybe Wiliams isn't that guy but there are certainly big WR's available that can do the job.

I respect your football opinions Dallas and I do not think Olsen sucked I just don't think he was anything special.  Perhaps he just seemed better to you because the Bears have been so bad at the position for so long. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 08:46:15 am
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/783992-greg-olsen-trade-to-panthers-hardly-a-reason-for-angelo-bashing

I think this article sums up my thoughts pretty well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on July 30, 2011, 09:16:12 am
Quote
Perhaps he just seemed better to you because the Bears have been so bad at the position for so long.

I think this may be the reason people just don't like the trade.  He was a first round pick and the best we have had at that position in a long long time.  It was a sore spot for so long and now the scab might have been ripped off...

I like Olsen.  I like the trade.  I wish him pro bowls in the future.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 30, 2011, 09:17:26 am
Even though you really never ask me the question about whether Olsen is worth the contract I believe I did answer the question and so did Griz. 

There is no receiver in our offense last year worth that kind of money.   Even if we radically improve our O-line Martz offense will never feature the TE.

Roy Williams can probably block a 190 lb DB, but lets line him up against a 280 lb defensive lineman with his hand down one on one and ask him to pass block.   No offense coordinator in the league would make a wideout do that...very few OC would make a TE do that as often as Martz did.

Look at Pompei's recent article.  You'll see a picture of Olsen catching a TD over the top of a Phily DB.  Offhand I recall the 1st GB game when Cutler gets hits on a key 3rd down play and throws a jump ball to Olsen.  Later on Olsen makes a sliding catch at the goaline for a TD.   

I'll take his athleticism to make those kind of catches and live with his inability to break tackles.  He also had good hands and he showed up every week...pretty durable (62 out of 64 games).

Did you see him outrun the Cowboy secondary in Dallas...did the same against the Seahawks in the playoff game?  Did you whine about his inability to break tackles on those plays?

And I thought his blocking was adequate.  I mean, how many NFL TEs are asked to consistently pass block?

For the most part Bear TEs in the past 30 years or so have been one dimensional aside from maybe Emory Moorehead and Dez Clark.  If you can get a TE who can capably block and can outrun LBs on pass paterns forcing the OC to put a DB on him it can really help to open up your offense.

Bears just couldn't take advantage of his skill base.  Poor offensive line, no #1 WR, and now Martz playcalling - there is just no way Olsen could ever flourish and earn that kind of money here unless those things changed.

We still don't have a true #1 WR, offensive line personnel hasn't changed radically, and Martz is still here and now we just lost our athletic TE.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 30, 2011, 09:24:53 am
Trib says Carimi will start his 1st practice at LT.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on July 30, 2011, 09:25:44 am
I don't think Williams will be asked to block a DE too much, that will be for Kellen Davis and the new Spaeth guy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 30, 2011, 09:27:00 am
If we had an OC not named Martz, Olsen would be our starting TE this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 30, 2011, 09:30:45 am
Bingo.  No way do you relegate Carimi to RT until you see what he can do at his old college position, LT.  I don't know why folks assumed he would just go there.

I really like the J'Marcus Webb story from last year, but to just pencil him in at LT is crazy especially when he struggled so much at RT, at least early on.

Now maybe they decide to let Carimi learn the game at RT and Webb or Omiyale plays LT, but if you draft a guy in the first round from such a good program as Wisconson you'd be foolish not to at least see what he can do at LT.

Of course we won't have an idea of what he can do until the preseason...but this is a good start.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 30, 2011, 09:32:56 am
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/783992-greg-olsen-trade-to-panthers-hardly-a-reason-for-angelo-bashing

I think this article sums up my thoughts pretty well.

That article is so flawed...I just don't have enough time to rip it.  Maybe later.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 30, 2011, 09:41:31 am
Bears undergo special teams makeover  (http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post/_/id/4670928/bears-undergo-special-teams-makeover)

"It's very tough [losing Davis and Manning]," Toub said Friday. "There is going to be a lot of new bodies out there. The toughest thing is, I don't even know these guys. I can't even put a face with a name. So I got to get to know what kind of style they are. We got to get to know these guys, we need to do it every practice until we get it down."

But it's not all doom and gloom for Toub. The Bears remain actively committed to bringing back Graham, which is certainly a possibility, even though teams have expressed interest in the free agent special teams ace. The Bears also struck early in free agency to ink punter Adam Podlesh and wide receiver Sam Hurd, who according to Toub, were both identified by the team as priority signings.

"[Podlesh] was always our No. 1 guy," Toub said. "He was always our No. 1 guy. He's the guy we targeted early way back. We were so happy to get him. As soon as we were able to call him, we tried to recruit him just like we were in college again. He fits us. He's very athletic, he runs a 4.4 [40 yard dash], he's got a great hands, he's a directional punter. He's a young [Brad] Maynard is what he is. He's reaching his prime right now. Again, we're very happy and pleased to have him in the mix."

Gee, I've always wanted a punter who can run a 4.4...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on July 30, 2011, 09:54:48 am
Quote
Gee, I've always wanted a punter who can run a 4.4...

Well, they do have to be quick enough to run out of the way of the loose returner before they get bowled over...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 10:07:07 am
I would rather have Malcom Floyd rather than Braylon Edwards.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on July 30, 2011, 10:59:57 am
Well, they do have to be quick enough to run out of the way of the loose returner before they get bowled over...

LOL.

Just for a moment that reminded me of Abe Gibron and the "Polish Prince".
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on July 30, 2011, 11:18:36 am
like Olse or not, he made some plays and I don't see how you are wise to subtract from the 30th ranked offense.

Taking one bullet out of the gun doesn't give you more firepower.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 30, 2011, 12:04:38 pm
Olsen was not a good blocker, compared to other tight ends.  But he was a very good blocker compared to wide receivers, even the big ones.  Williams may be able to exceed Olsen's receiving talents, but he can not come close to replacing his blocking talents.  He can not replace Olsen it two-tight end alignments.

It may be that the Bears think that Davis is ready to replace Olsen, and if that it true, the deal makes sense.  If not, it was foolish, unless you are ready to write off this season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 12:22:40 pm
So now trading Olsen is the same as writing off the season?  Seriously?

Kellen Davis is every bit the TE Olsen is and performed just as well when given the chance.  In fact each of the Bears TE's made plays in the passing game when given the chance.

If Olsen is so good I guess the Bears offense will now be dead last and the Panthers offense will be top ten now that they have him...

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 12:24:30 pm
Corey Graham has re-signed with the Bears.  It is a one year contract.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 12:32:49 pm
Good for both sides. I thought the Bears underused Graham. If he doesnt like how he is used this year he can walk
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 12:38:31 pm
I found this interesting:

Per-team spending minimum doesn’t apply until 2013

Posted by Mike Florio on July 30, 2011, 1:57 AM EDT

One of the highlights of the labor deal, from the perspective of the players, comes from the requirement that each team must spend at least 89 percent of the salary cap in cash on an annual basis.  “We cannot have teams like KC spend only 67% of the cap like they did in 2009,” Saints quarterback Drew Brees wrote in an e-mail to his teammates.  “It doesn’t matter how high the cap is if they are only going to spend that much.  So with a minimum in place, it requires all teams to be at or above that minimum.  More money in players pockets.”

The players got what they wanted.  But it doesn’t apply until 2013.

Yes, for 2011 and 2012 no minimum cash spending requirement applies on a per-team basis.  We were first alerted to this reality on Thursday morning, during a weekly segment with Steve Davis and Ed Norris of 105.7 the Fan in Baltimore.  Davis said that Ravens president Dick Cass had explained the situation in a recent on-air interview, and Davis forwarded the audio to us later in the day.

The summary of the final deal that we obtained on Monday confirms that, indeed, the “minimum team cash spend” applies on a four-year basis from 2013 through 2016, and from 2017 through 2020.  No minimum per-team expenditure applies for 2011 and 2012.

Still, on a league-wide basis, the labor deal requires the NFL to spend 99 percent of the salary cap in cash in 2011 and 2012.

So what happens if too many teams spend so little that the league isn’t able to average 99 percent of the cap in actual cash spent?  NFL general counsel Jeff Pash, via NFL spokesman Greg Aiello, explained Friday night that the league would be required to pay the difference to the players.

That said, the league doesn’t believe that it will be a problem, even if teams like the Bucs and Bengals and Chiefs decide to spend as little as possible over the next two years.  Based on the money spent to date, the league thinks that the average expenditure of $119 million per team easily will be met.

Remember, it’s not cap space but cash spent.  So when a team like the Panthers gives defensive end Charles Johnson a $30 million signing bonus on a six-year deal, only $5 million counts against the cap — but $30 million counts against the league’s total spending requirement of $3.8 billion.

The more relevant point, for the next two years, is that teams like the Bucs, Bengals, and Chiefs can choose to stay as far below the salary cap as they want.


More money in the McCaskets pocket
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 30, 2011, 01:40:57 pm
Trading Olsen is not the same thing as writing off the season, but downgrading your capabilities when you are trying to be competitive certainly doesn't help.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 30, 2011, 02:44:49 pm
Pekin made the comment about Williams being big enough and equal to Olsen in blocking ability.  I don't believe he was serious about Williams replacing Olsen and was just trying to mock Olsen's abilities.  Williams may be a good blocker but will not be asked to lineup as a TE.

The key to this trade is Kellen Davis.  He came into the league as a pass receiver with blocking deficiencies.  This is often the case with a lot of receiving TEs where they aren't asked in college to do the dirty work.  But Davis has a bit has the size and if motivated could develop into a solid blocker. 

He has shown, primarily in preseason games, that he can catch the ball on the run.  I just hope Martz prefers him to Spaeth.   

Yeah, the same Martz that chose Todd Collins over Hanie in the NFC championship game.                                                               
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 30, 2011, 03:03:03 pm
Kreutz still hasn't signed and now Garza is filling in at center.

And I just read that the Herman Johnson experiment is over - he was waived.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 30, 2011, 03:18:59 pm

 Herman Johnson was a Tice pickup.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 04:19:49 pm
He probably balooned to 4 baloons
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 04:26:01 pm
Williams is not a TE nor will he ever line up as a TE.  If they don't use a TE or two TE's they can use more WR's and spread the defense out more.  This works just as well as having a TE or two TE's and often times better. 

I don't think the loss of Olsen is that big of a deal especially the amount of money he was going to command, that it was his last year and we got a third round pick.  Apparently some of you disagree.

Which is fine no need to go on and on about it and beat a dead horse.  Very soon thee will be lots of other things to discuss.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 30, 2011, 04:28:49 pm
Sounds like Harrison spent too much time on the sofa with the Dorito bags as well.

OK, he's at 327 and they want him at 316.  Should take about a week or so.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 04:47:40 pm
4 reasons the Bears could be a player for DT Amobi Okoye?

BY SEAN JENSEN sjensen@suntimes.com July 29, 2011 12:00PM

The Houston Texans are actively shopping defensive tackle Amobi Okoye, the 10th overall pick in the 2007 NFL Draft.


If they can’t find a trade partner, then the Texans are expected to waive him.


His production has been a disappointment, with only 11 sacks in four seasons.


Not what you expect from a player picked so high.


So why should the Bears be interested?


Well, Okoye was heralded for his athleticism coming out of Louisville. He’s flashed that during his career, as well.


Second, the Bears have Rod Marinelli, widely considered one -- if not the best -- defensive line coach in the league. Marinelli also relishes a chance to work with young players with athleticism.


Third, Okoye’s price tag is reasonable. He enters the final year of his rookie contract, scheduled to make $2.95 million.


Fourth, he’s 24. As in 24 YEARS OLD. And he’s not turning 25 until next June.


The Bears have parted ways with former Pro Bowl defensive tackle Tommie Harris. Not that I’m comparing the two players. But, Okoye is extremely athletic for a 315-pound man.


Within the division, I’ll bet you Minnesota Vikings defensive line coach Karl Dunbar would also be intrigued. In my years of covering, Dunbar also welcomed a chance to work with young players with potential.


Why are the Texans dumping him? Well, in addition to production, Okoye is also not considered an ideal fit in Wade Phillips’ new 3-4 scheme.

Sounds like a one year experiment, if it happens. Then again I doubt Jensen knows what he is talking about.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 30, 2011, 04:50:54 pm
He was waived today.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 30, 2011, 04:58:32 pm
Bears offensive line* revealed (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/29185/bears-offensive-line-revealed)

For months, we've been discussing the Chicago Bears' offensive line* with a presumed asterisk. All five of their starting positions were pending post-lockout moves. We wouldn't know their first-team lineup, it seemed, until the start of training camp.  Even now, however, it's impossible to know if what the Bears trotted out during their opening practice Saturday in any way resembles their intentions for Week 1 of the regular season. For the record, here is what the used during the early portion of team drills:

Left tackle: Frank Omiyale
Left guard: Chris Williams
Center: Roberto Garza
Right guard: Lance Louis
Right tackle: J'Marcus Webb

Here's what I think we can glean from that grouping:

•The Bears aren't eager to move Webb to left tackle, as some have discussed this offseason. If they were, it stands to reason he would have opened training camp there even if the rest of the group is in flux.

•For similar reasons, it appears the Bears want Williams to be their left guard first and foremost. The could conceivably work him at left tackle or even a center, but if they wanted him to play either of those positions on Sept. 11, you would think they would have started him there right away.

•Garza is at center because Olin Kreutz remains unsigned. The Bears would much prefer to play Garza at right guard, but in the short-term it couldn't hurt them to get Garza some work as an emergency center. The real question is if he would be their answer if Kreutz pulls a surprise and signs elsewhere.

Where does this leave rookie Gabe Carimi? For the moment, it's no surprise that he wasn't working with the first team in his first NFL practice. But he will get his work at left tackle, as Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune notes, and at some point this summer he should overtake Omiyale. In that scenario, Omiyale could ultimately serve as an expensive but experienced backup at both guard and tackle positions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 30, 2011, 05:09:55 pm
He was waived today.

 Worth a look ?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 05:26:37 pm
Worth a look ?

Lazy
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on July 30, 2011, 05:42:23 pm
Lazy

 Camp fodder?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 05:44:21 pm
Bears offensive line* revealed (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/29185/bears-offensive-line-revealed)

For months, we've been discussing the Chicago Bears' offensive line* with a presumed asterisk. All five of their starting positions were pending post-lockout moves. We wouldn't know their first-team lineup, it seemed, until the start of training camp.  Even now, however, it's impossible to know if what the Bears trotted out during their opening practice Saturday in any way resembles their intentions for Week 1 of the regular season. For the record, here is what the used during the early portion of team drills:

Left tackle: Frank Omiyale
Left guard: Chris Williams
Center: Roberto Garza
Right guard: Lance Louis
Right tackle: J'Marcus Webb

Here's what I think we can glean from that grouping:

•The Bears aren't eager to move Webb to left tackle, as some have discussed this offseason. If they were, it stands to reason he would have opened training camp there even if the rest of the group is in flux.

•For similar reasons, it appears the Bears want Williams to be their left guard first and foremost. The could conceivably work him at left tackle or even a center, but if they wanted him to play either of those positions on Sept. 11, you would think they would have started him there right away.

•Garza is at center because Olin Kreutz remains unsigned. The Bears would much prefer to play Garza at right guard, but in the short-term it couldn't hurt them to get Garza some work as an emergency center. The real question is if he would be their answer if Kreutz pulls a surprise and signs elsewhere.

Where does this leave rookie Gabe Carimi? For the moment, it's no surprise that he wasn't working with the first team in his first NFL practice. But he will get his work at left tackle, as Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune notes, and at some point this summer he should overtake Omiyale. In that scenario, Omiyale could ultimately serve as an expensive but experienced backup at both guard and tackle positions.

That line couldnt stop a fly. Thats worse than last year in a much improved division
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 05:49:24 pm
I agree that is one pathetic line and better not be the line we start with in the season opener or we are going to finish behind the Vikings.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 05:52:11 pm
I agree that is one pathetic line and better not be the line we start with in the season opener or we are going to finish behind the Vikings.

Maybe even 0-16.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 06:08:45 pm
My guess is it is the typical let's make Carimi earn his spot Lovie deal. 

I am still hoping like hell they sign Kruetz and a couple more guys for the O-line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 06:38:50 pm
He was waived today.

I just saw that. I think the Bears just could bite. If he is a FA then he wont cost almost 3 Mill
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 06:42:30 pm
No Kreutz at Bears practice, but several mishandled snaps
     
By Dan Pompei, Tribune reporter
 
6:12 p.m. CDT, July 30, 2011

BOURBONNAIS -- Conspicuous by his absence from the Bears' first practice of the year was center Olin Kreutz.

Several mishandled exchanges between the center and quarterback were a not-so subtle reminder that Kreutz has yet to agree to terms with the only team he has played for in the NFL.

In Kreutz's place with the first string was Roberto Garza, who moved over from right guard. Garza was replaced by Lance Louis.

Most of the exchange problems came when left guard Chris Williams stepped in with the second team.

Normally, Edwin Williams would have been taking those reps, but he can't practice until Thursday because he just signed his contract as an exclusive rights free agent. 

"You don't have your starting center, so you move the next guy in and figure out who you can develop for depth," Bears offensive line coach Mike Tice said.

In fairness to Williams, he hasn't had any offseason exposure to center, which he has not played previously.

"I was going to use Chris at center some in the offseason to see if that could be real after Olin retired," Tice said. "We didn't have the ability to do that."

As for Kreutz, Tice said, "He brings a lot of leadership. He's one of the key leaders on our team. We have other leaders who will have to step up until he comes back or whatever."

dpompei@tribune.com

Edwin Williams hasnt played center? Thats bunk
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 30, 2011, 06:48:13 pm
""I was going to use Chris at center some in the offseason to see if that could be real after Olin retired," Tice said. "We didn't have the ability to do that."

What is Tice thinking?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 06:59:17 pm
IMHO that would be a bad experiment, but I suppose Angelo hopes to get some value out of Williams and not be a wasted 1st round pick
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 07:02:01 pm
My guess is it is the typical let's make Carimi earn his spot Lovie deal. 

I am still hoping like hell they sign Kruetz and a couple more guys for the O-line.

This team will go nowhere unless they do
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on July 30, 2011, 07:26:04 pm
KFFL is reporting Cory Graham signed 1 year deal with Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on July 30, 2011, 07:50:31 pm
Does not  look like Olin will be back.

http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/6819555/olin-kreutz-chicago-bears-deal-not-likely-happen-agent-says
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on July 30, 2011, 07:50:45 pm
OK, lets panic after one practice.



Carl Nicks was still available this morning as was another good guard.    Jerry?  Jerry?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 07:51:06 pm
Bears sign DT Okoye to one-year deal
     
By Vaughn McClure, Tribune reporter
 
7:22 p.m. CDT, July 30, 2011
BOURBONNAIS -- The Bears are set to give another former first-round pick a chance to prove his worth.

A day after signing former first-rounders Roy Williams and Vernon Gholston, multiple sources told the Tribune the Bears have agreed to terms with defensive tackle Amobi Okoye, the 10th overall pick in the 2007 draft. Okoye will get a one-year contract.

Okoye was released by the Houston Texans.

One has to wonder if the pending addition of Okoye could be a bad sign for defensive tackle Marcus Harrison, who reported to camp 11 pounds overweight and was held out of Saturday's first practice.

The Bears were expected to secure defensive line help at the start of free agency. Re-signing nose tackle Anthony Adams to a two-year, $4.5 million deal ($1.5 million signing bonus) got the ball rolling. Then the Bears brought in Gholston at defensive end after his three, sack-less seasons with the Jets.

Although the Bears are counting on the play of Henry Melton, Matt Toeaina, rookie Stephen Paea, and Adams inside, Okoye is another low-cost, low-risk option. He is certainly familiar with Bears defensive backs coach Jon Hoke, who used to have the same role in Houston. And he's good friends with Bears defensive end and fellow Nigerian Israel Idonije.

The 6-foot-2, 315-pound Okoye started 16 games last season and had 27 tackles and three sacks.

vxmcclure@tribune.com

Why should we be surprised
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 07:53:27 pm
OK, lets panic after one practice.



Carl Nicks was still available this morning as was another good guard.    Jerry?  Jerry?

One of the Atlanta guards signed but so far I havent seen the other one signed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 07:56:54 pm
Does not  look like Olin will be back.

http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/6819555/olin-kreutz-chicago-bears-deal-not-likely-happen-agent-says

Negotiating ploy by Bartlestein to up the ante?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 08:00:12 pm
The remaining lineman wouldnt even make a 2 bit line elsewhere.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on July 30, 2011, 08:04:20 pm
I was thinking the same thing about Kreutz,

Not sure why he would have much value to anyone else.


Love this Okoye signing.

Hopefully Marinelli can turn one or both of these new guys around.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on July 30, 2011, 08:08:53 pm
from Footballs Future draft site in 2007

Okoye may be the ideal nose tackle. He is built low to the ground, and stays low, making it hard for defenders to get under his pads. Combined with his bulk and his strength, and he is immovable on the interior. He is powerful at the point of attack and can push lineman around and clog running lanes on the inside. Okoye’s ability to succeed despite his age is a testament to his intensity. He will not be outworked on the field.

He is an excellent run stopper, but Okoye does not project as much of a playmaker at the next level. He can get penetration but lacks the ability to finish plays off. He has had a lot of success at a young age, but he may need more time to mature before he becomes a factor in the NFL.

Amobi Okoye is a special player. He has had a lot of success in college, and his entire career will be played as a teenager. His upside at the next level is tremendous. He could be an excellent nose tackle in a few years. Okoye’s rise during the season has continued throughout the post season. He may have surpassed Alan Branch as the top tackle in the draft, and is a potential Top 10 pick
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 08:25:08 pm
Bears add Marion Barber, likely lose Olin Kreutz

 Posted by Michael David Smith on July 30, 2011, 9:10 PM EDT
 
AP
The Chicago Bears have picked up another free agent, but they’re likely to lose one of their own.
 
Running back Marion Barber, formerly of the Cowboys, has signed a two-year deal with the Bears, Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune is reporting. Barber was released by the Cowboys this week after six seasons in Dallas. He’s coming off a 2010 season in which he had a career-low 374 rushing yards and a career-low 3.3 yards a carry.
 
PFT has learned that Barber’s deal with the Bears is a two-year, $5 million contract.
 
But while the Bears add Barber, they may be losing veteran center Olin Kreutz. Kreutz’s agent, Mark Bartlestein, said it’s not looking good for his client to remain in Chicago.
 
“He’s always wanted to make a deal with the Bears. But right now, it doesn’t look like it’s going to happen,” Bartlestein told ESPN.com.
 
Those quotes could be designed to spur the Bears to up their offer. But they also may be an indication that the Bears are going to have to find a new center because they’re about to lose the one who has started the last 134 games.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 08:30:29 pm
Whatever the Okoye deal is it is only for one year. Not a bad deal considering what else is on the roster
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 08:37:24 pm
I have no problem with the FA moves except the fact we have done nothing for the O-line!  COME ON!!!

Our O-line sucks and we have added no veteran free agents and let our center go because he wants a three year deal and the Berars are offering a one year deal.  I would be fine with this if we had ONE capable center on our team.

Angello's blind spot for the O-line is freaking killing this team!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 08:44:58 pm
3 year deal for Kreutz? I wouldnt do that. However we are between a rock and a hard place.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 08:46:59 pm
I think I might be wrong when I said earlier that one of the OGs of the Falcons signed. I believe it was Clabo the tackle I saw that signed. Dahl and Blalock are the two OGs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on July 30, 2011, 08:59:11 pm
Whenever an agent says that his guy "always wanted to sign with the Bears, but it looks like he can't", it usually means that they are close, but want more money.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 30, 2011, 09:02:12 pm
Let's hope so or they split the difference and do a two year deal.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 09:04:01 pm
I dont believe he has two good solid years left but its sure better than 3.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 30, 2011, 09:16:50 pm
Williams must prove himself again
New Bears receiver will get chance to redeem himself
     
 
Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
8:37 p.m. CDT, July 30, 2011
BOURBONNAIS — Darryl Drake first met Roy Williams when he was a junior at Odessa Permian, the school on which the novel and movie "Friday Night Lights" is based.

The thing the Bears wide receivers coach, then an assistant at Texas, remembers most was Williams' transcript. All A's and B's recounted Drake, who beamed like a proud father when talking about his newest pupil.

So it comes as no surprise that a smart guy like that would seek out the quarterback for a meeting as soon as possible. Williams ate at a table with Jay Cutler during lunch Saturday, working to forge what he hopes will be a mutually beneficial relationship.

"I am new to this team and the leader of the football team is the quarterback," Williams said. "So for me to talk to the quarterback and get to know him, that's good for our football team and myself. A lot of quarterbacks don't like the receivers."

Does Williams have first-hand experience with a bad quarterback relationship? Maybe with the Cowboys?

"Oh no," he replied coyly. "That never has happened."

All of his answers in response to questions about three poor seasons with the Cowboys came with short answers.

Why didn't it work there?

"I don't know," he said.

Does he need to figure out why to succeed here?

"No," he said.

Does he have something to prove?

"No," he said.

The fact is Williams signed a prove-it deal with the Bears, a one-year contract with a base salary of less than $2 million. There are salary incentives, but the short-term contract is designed for the 29-year-old to prove his value and get back to the bargaining table.

The Bears have a low-risk gamble that a former first-round pick and Pro Bowl performer for the Lions can click for them as the offense makes a transition to greater emphasis on the wide receivers.

"I can't say what happened in Dallas, I don't know," Drake said. "All I know is the relationship I have with him and the relationship he has with coach (Mike) Martz. His motivation alone. … I really do think he wants to prove he can play."

Williams always said the right things when he was with the Cowboys and for the most part reports always indicated he did the right things. It just didn't work and the draft bounty Jerry Jones paid made it the anti-Herschel Walker trade for the Cowboys.

He had become the third receiver for the Cowboys and drops were a problem. According to ESPN, Williams dropped 8.2 percent of passes targeted for him over the last three seasons, the highest of any receiver targeted 200 or more times.

"He may have had some at some inopportune times but every receiver has them," Drake said. "That's not a concern. The concern is him making the plays he's given the opportunity to make consistently.

"Roy is one of those guys who feeds on success. If he's getting it, he's fine. If he's not, then he needs some counseling. And most receivers that have any kind of ability are like that. The great ones are like that."

Because Williams was a free agent he has to sit out until Thursday's practice, but he likes his chances of rebounding in a big way. He knows the system and he didn't forget Martz's golden rule.

"If I am where I am supposed to be when I am supposed to be there and don't fool the quarterback, I have a good chance," Williams said. "I don't fool the quarterback."

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on July 30, 2011, 11:00:49 pm
Interesting about Marion Barber.  If I was Chester Taylor I might be getting a little nervous. 

And I was really big on Okoye.  Cant wait to see what he brings to the party. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 31, 2011, 05:35:43 am
Chester Taylor better have a great camp. We overpaid for him last year. The turk will be a calling.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on July 31, 2011, 05:56:17 am
I really really really like the Marion Barber signing.  We have needed a short yardage third down back for forever.  Forte has been adequate in short down situations...but Barber is a beast.  His biggest problem is staying healthy.  In Chicago all he needs is 10-12 carries a game. 

Pekin I am totally with you...still cannot believe the Oline has not been addressed.  Bring back Kruetz will not be enough IMO.  We need a quality starter at G as well as center.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 31, 2011, 06:44:54 am
I agree. That line currently flat out sucks. At leaast they got rid of one pretender so far
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on July 31, 2011, 07:41:11 am
Kreutz isn't the Kreutz of past years, but without him, this Oline is going to be rough.......

Jer has ignored the oline for too long (and appears to have been the only one who did not see this coming). His scrambling in the last 2 years (Williams and now Carimi) may be too little to late to stop the flood of defenders pounding Cutler.....

"I am Jerry Angelo, destroyer of NFL Franchises ! Look upon me and despair !"
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: jojopuppyfish on July 31, 2011, 07:52:34 am
It took forever to find where your forum moved too.
I like the Marion Barber signing alot.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 31, 2011, 08:02:14 am
Welcome aboard jojo.

Barber and Spaeth are giving me Gopher flashbacks.  I believe he can be effective and stay healthy on a committee type role.

The master of first round busts can't help himself from getting other people's first round busts.  Typical, but low risk with potential on the DL.

Where are the offensive lineman?  The Kreutz talks preventing you from looking around in the market?  That's bull$hit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 31, 2011, 08:12:47 am
The fact is Williams signed a prove-it deal with the Bears, a one-year contract with a base salary of less than $2 million. There are salary incentives, but the short-term contract is designed for the 29-year-old to prove his value and get back to the bargaining table.  The Bears have a low-risk **** that a former first-round pick and Pro Bowl performer for the Lions can click for them as the offense makes a transition to greater emphasis on the wide receivers.

Annoys me that "g amble" is censored.  That's a low risk contract right der.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 31, 2011, 08:24:26 am
I find this hard to believe.  According to Trib (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-07-30/sports/ct-spt-0731-olin-kreutz-bears-chicago20110731_1_bears-roberto-garza-tim-ruskell), the Bears are offering Kreutz $4 million for one year.  He wants $4.5.  And neither side is budging.

I was under the impression that the cause of the impasse was only the number of the years (2 vs. 3) more so than the money, especially a measly 500K.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 31, 2011, 08:53:41 am
It makes no sense to finally get a franchise QB but then to put a line in front of him that couldn't hold a bunch a girl scouts back..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 31, 2011, 09:04:23 am
Rich Gosselin listed the top 44 undrafted free agent signings this season - Bears had 4 of them:

Sanzenbacher WR Ohio State
Linnenkohl C Oregon State
Davis G Georgia
Smith TE Virginia Tech
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 31, 2011, 10:12:41 am
http://www.chicagobears.com/multimedia/multimediapopup.asp?mm_file_id=2401&play_clip=Y&rn=2

Basicly Tice says Edwin Williams is going to be the #1 center if Kruetz does not re-sign.  Garza will stay at RG.  Chris Williams is going to get a few reps each day at center.

Edwin Williams can not practice until Thursday.  What I take from this is Kruetz can't either.  So if they are going to sign him I expect it to happen before Thursday.  Same with any other free agents.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 31, 2011, 11:03:43 am
Rookie watch

First-round pick Gabe Carimi played with the second unit at left tackle Saturday. Like all the newcomers, he’ll have a tougher chance to make an impact because of the lockout.

‘‘Obviously you’d want more time to be in there,’’ Carimi said. ‘‘But I believe in my abilities to pick up plays and be able to make a difference right away.’’
 
With recently signed linebacker Nick Roach unable to play until Thursday, rookie J.T. Thomas, the sixth-round pick from West Virginia, practiced with the first team.

Class clown

Defensive tackle Anthony Adams broke up a defensive meeting Saturday with an impression of coach Lovie Smith:

‘‘I think they thought he was in [the room],’’ Adams said. ‘‘He comes in after everyone else, so I did an impersonation of him and everybody turned around.

Adams’ impression?

‘‘First off, guys, we gotta beat Green Bay,’’ he said in his ‘‘Lovie’’ voice. ‘‘I started the meeting off like that and guys were turning around. Then the noticed it was me and started laughing.’’
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 31, 2011, 11:19:38 am
Basicly Tice says Edwin Williams is going to be the #1 center if Kruetz does not re-sign.



See, they have a plan after all. Wonder if they have a stretcher reserved specifically for Cutler..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 31, 2011, 02:12:10 pm
Carimi should be given a shot at LT.  If Omiyale wins out then move him to RT against Webb and if he can't unseat him then move him to guard.

He's too good of talent to sit on our bench...(at least I hope he is).

Some will think that evaluating Carimi will be tough to do with the shortened offseason, but those OTAs are meaningless for judging o-lineman.  The first trust tests come when the pre-season games begin.  That's where Chris Williams was exposed at LT...but still somehow won the job.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 31, 2011, 03:14:22 pm
Our new GM Tim Ruskell signs his 1st pick center Chris Spencer (http://www.chicitysports.com/2011/07/31/source-bears-sign-seahawks-center-chris-spencer-olin-kreutz-to-not-return/).  Now all Angie ought to do is respond in kind and bring back his 1st pick Colombo  ::).  Bye bye Olin.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 31, 2011, 03:19:28 pm
When I heard the Bears and Kreutz were only 500K apart I about crashed the car. Man split the difference and get him in a uniform. Stupid.

And where is the rest of the OLine?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on July 31, 2011, 03:24:27 pm
Carimi should be given a shot at LT.  If Omiyale wins out then move him to RT against Webb and if he can't unseat him then move him to guard.


Agree!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 31, 2011, 03:36:24 pm
Looking through some Seattle blurbs/blogs on Chris Spencer...

Word out of Seattle is that free-agent O-linemen Sean Locklear and Chris Spencer have, in effect, been told to look elsewhere.  Spencer, a former first-round draft pick who has had as many downs as ups as the team's starting center, has been replaced by third-year pro Max Unger, who suffered a season-ending toe injury in Week One last season as the starting right guard.  Spencer is an interesting case. Some will remember his constant injuries and his overblown struggles with line calls and hail the departure of one of Tim Ruskell's first-round "busts". Others will cite his steady improvement in 2007 and see just another hole being opened on the line.  Part of the equation is who's replacing them.  The center position will be manned by Max Unger, who spent all last year on injured reserve and spent his rookie year getting blasted backward into his own running back several times a game.  I was glad Chris Spencer got re-signed in 2010 and hoped it would happen again in 2011, because while he wasn't the world-beater everyone wanted Robbie Tobeck's successor to be, he wasn't a hole on the line either. Even decent players can serve a purpose.

From the Seattle News Tribune

OL Chris Spencer Age: 29
The skinny: Perhaps Seattle’s most consistent linemen last season, Spencer started all 16 games in anchoring the middle of the offensive line. The former first round pick started 70 games for Seattle, but has been dinged up and hasn’t always lived up to expectations. The Seahawks appear to be ready to turn the page, with general manager John Schneider saying 2009 second-round draft choice Max Unger’s ideal position is center.

Stay or go? Spencer was Alex Gibbs’ choice to play center, and Cable is a Gibbs’ disciple. But I think Spencer may be ready to move on.

From espn.com mailbag

Don from Scotland thinks the Seahawks should consider re-signing center Chris Spencer. He points to Marshawn Lynch's run as evidence, noting that Spencer threw key blocks.
 
Mike Sando: That was a sensational run in many regards, but not representative of the Seahawks' performance in the running game last season. It didn't validate anything. I'll agree to the extent that I think Spencer has been pretty solid a lot of the time. I also think the Seahawks need a new identity up front with new personalities and new leadership.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 31, 2011, 03:42:33 pm
The good?  Ummmm maybe, Alex Gibbs "liked" him I suppose and Gibbs was one of the best in the biz as OL coach...before he suddenly quit before last season even started.

The bad?  Even though Seattle had ample cap space, they settled on replacing Spencer with a guard who was IR'd last year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 31, 2011, 03:48:42 pm
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-fantasy/09000d5d81c4da38/Saints-defense-fumble-recovery?r_src=ramp

When was the last time you saw Olin Kruetz do this in short yardage?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 31, 2011, 03:52:32 pm
He blew the DT up and pushed him 3 yards downfield.

Kruetz was a hell of a player and will be missed. However the Bears offered him 4 million and he turned it down.  That was a very fair offer for a guy on his last legs.

I am on board with this signing.  Now get us guard and I will be happy.  Get us a tackle also and I will be bouncing off the walls.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 31, 2011, 04:06:45 pm
I wouldn't mind an upgrade or legit depth at CB either...  Is it too much to ask for Cromartie?  Ok don't answer that.

Bears could be in mix for Super Bowl nemesis Hayden (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-could-be-in-mix-for-super-bowl-nemesis-hayden-20110731,0,779552.story)

By Vaughn McClure
 
Tribune Reporter
 
12:27 p.m. CDT, July 31, 2011

Chicago Bears fan are familiar with Kelvin Hayden: The veteran cornerback picked off a Rex Grossman pass in Super Bowl XLI and returned it 56 yards for a game-changing touchdown.  Yes, he took it to the house. Now, could Hayden be headed home?  The Indianapolis Colts released the former Hubbard and Illinois standout, meaning the 28-year-old Hayden is on the open market.  A handful of teams already have expressed interest.  Don’t be surprised if the Bears join the mix.  Before Hayden signed a five-year, $43 million deal with the Colts in February of 2009, a source confirmed he was the top free-agent target on the Bears’ wish list. The Colts and Bears run virtually the same defensive scheme, so it was a natural fit.  Hayden was a starter for the Colts the last four seasons. He ended up on injured reserve this past season with a neck injury. A source close to Hayden said the player recently passed a physical.  With Charles Tillman’s injury history, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see the Bears look into available options, with Hayden topping the list.  Tillman and Tim Jennings lined up as the starters during the first day of training camp with Zack Bowman and Joshua Moore behind. Corey Graham re-signed with the team and can return to practice Thursday. The Bears, however, never have given Graham a serious chance to play defense.  The 6-foot, 195-pound Hayden has nine career interceptions and has returned three for touchdowns.  For the Bears, it might be just a matter of how much money they are willing to invest in Hayden.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pistol on July 31, 2011, 04:09:54 pm
Barber is a step up from Taylor. But I can't say we have improved anywhere else on the offensive side of the ball. We got Williams but lost Olsen. Spencer for Kruetz is a wash and with a short camp, replacing your center will be even more difficult.

Its probably sad that I am more excited about some of the undrafted kids than anyone else we brought in.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 31, 2011, 04:22:03 pm
Spencer? OMG. Oh well. We better hope one of the UDFLs is able to handle the job.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 31, 2011, 04:24:12 pm
I want a guard and a good one yet in free agency.  I do love our undrafted free agent signings.  I am hoping one or two actually become good starters for us.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 31, 2011, 04:46:27 pm
Bears could be in mix for Super Bowl nemesis Hayden
     
By Vaughn McClure
 
Tribune Reporter
 
12:27 p.m. CDT, July 31, 2011
Chicago Bears fan are familiar with Kelvin Hayden: The veteran cornerback picked off a Rex Grossman pass in Super Bowl XLI and returned it 56 yards for a game-changing touchdown.

Yes, he took it to the house. Now, could Hayden be headed home?

The Indianapolis Colts released the former Hubbard and Illinois standout, meaning the 28-year-old Hayden is on the open market.  A handful of teams already have expressed interest.

Don’t be surprised if the Bears join the mix.

Before Hayden signed a five-year, $43 million deal with the Colts in February of 2009, a source confirmed he was the top free-agent target on the Bears’ wish list. The Colts and Bears run virtually the same defensive scheme, so it was a natural fit.

Hayden was a starter for the Colts the last four seasons. He ended up on injured reserve this past season with a neck injury. A source close to Hayden said the player recently passed a physical.

With Charles Tillman’s injury history, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see the Bears look into available options, with Hayden topping the list.

Tillman and Tim Jennings lined up as the starters during the first day of training camp with Zack Bowman and Joshua Moore behind. Corey Graham re-signed with the team and can return to practice Thursday. The Bears, however, never have given Graham a serious chance to play defense.

The 6-foot, 195-pound Hayden has nine career interceptions and has returned three for touchdowns.

For the Bears, it might be just a matter of how much money they are willing to invest in Hayden.

vxmcclure@tribune.com

Fine! But where are the improvements on the OLine?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 31, 2011, 04:47:06 pm
Spencer has more bulk and may provide more up the middle push than Kreutz - but can he pull like Kreutz on the sweeps?   Kreutz had all those starts and his leadership will be missed but we could have done a lot worse than getting an experienced center from a playoff team.

Kreutz was good at dropping back in pass protecting and feeling the pass pressure but I won't miss those funky snaps of his that drew all those 5 yard penalties.

I don't know what FA lineman are available.  But right now I'd think we're set at tackle but we need another guard otherwise its going to be Chris Williams and Roberto Garza again.  I don't know that Lance Louis can push either and I don't think Edwin Williams and Johan Asiata are serious options either.

Did we save any money in signing Spencer over Kreutz?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 31, 2011, 04:48:20 pm
And I really felt that with an improved DL push up the middle I could live with our Defensive secondary.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 31, 2011, 04:55:35 pm

You can never have enough good DBs.  I was really impressed by Tim Jennings last year.  Total lunch pale guy but got somewhat exposed by Jennings late in the year.  Bowman has the size and speed that Jennings lacks but Jennings has the intensity and is a better tackler.  Could be a good battle in camp. 

Throw Hayden in the mix with a youngster I liked in PS last year, Joshua Moore (who is most likely the fastest DB on the team now) and Corey Graham and nickel DJ Moore and you have superior depth as well as a bunch of special teamers.

Subtract Daniel Manning and Bullocks and add Conti and Hayden.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on July 31, 2011, 05:02:20 pm
Updated OL FA list (http://www.kffl.com/static/nfl/features/freeagents/fa.php?option=OL&y=2011)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 31, 2011, 05:07:09 pm
Dallas I agree.  Kruetz was still great at pulling.  I think we will miss his line calls the most as that is not supposed to be a strong suit of Spencers.

It also allows Cutler to become the true leader of the offense.  Maybe that is overblown but I think the QB nees to be the leader.  With Kruetz around everyone knew Kruetz was the leader of the offense. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on July 31, 2011, 05:15:46 pm
Spencer has played a lot of guard as well.  Perhaps the Bears are just sending a message to Kruetz?

Would we all be happy if Kruetz came back at center and Spencer played LG, Garza RG and let the tackle situation work itself out with the best two winning the job? 

I personally want one more O-line FA brought in for guard.  But if they can still get Kruetz back into the fold and Spencer can play guard maybe that works as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 31, 2011, 05:45:25 pm
I see Blaylock and Dahl have re-signed with Atlanta
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on July 31, 2011, 05:47:02 pm
I really hate to see anybody brought in here that Ruskell has had a hand in. That just has bust written all over it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on July 31, 2011, 06:37:41 pm
Don't know Spencer.  But 20 lbs heavier and 5 years young with 70 starts....sounds like an upgrade to me.  I love what Kruetz has done with the Bears, but anyone that was watching the last two season knows his game is starting to show holes.

This being said signing Kruetz and sliding Spencer to G works for me.  Adds quality backup C and upgrade to Williams at G.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on July 31, 2011, 06:50:12 pm
+1.  Sign Olin & the Bears are a hell of alot better off.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on July 31, 2011, 07:09:01 pm
Kruetz is definitely gone....

"The Bears on Sunday agreed to terms with former Seattle Seahawks center Chris Spencer and announced that veteran center Olin Kreutz’s tenure with the team is over."

http://www.chicagobears.com/news/NewsStory.asp?story_id=8008
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on July 31, 2011, 08:12:29 pm
Hopefully the botched snaps will be a thing of the past...

Spencer was a beast at Ole Miss! Hotty Toddy!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 31, 2011, 10:05:55 pm
More good news....

The Bears have agreed to terms with LB Brian Iwuh on a one-year contract.

Last season, Iwuh tied for second on the Bears with 18 special teams tackles in 16 games. He also tallied 16 defensive tackles, one sack and two forced fumbles. He started against the Seahawks in Week 6 for an injured Lance Briggs and lead the team with 12 tackles.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on July 31, 2011, 10:16:27 pm

I don't know that Kreutz has another offer with another team - the Trib article makes it sound like he might retire.  You need to read the entire thing but after reading this blurb:

Kreutz was eager to get to training camp, but the Bears didn't come to him with an offer — one year, $3 million — until Thursday. That was quickly rejected and Kreutz introduced comparables for veterans Matt Birk and Jeff Saturday, who average between $4 million and $4.5 million annually. Kreutz wanted to be in that vicinity. He wanted to sign that day. Heck, $4 million right then and there probably would have done it.

In the meantime, agent Mark Bartelstein told the Tribune coach Lovie Smith ensured him Friday the team would not be signing another center. When Kreutz finally heard from the team again Saturday, it was take-it-or-leave it. Kreutz left it.


Now maybe Angelo was a jerk in the way he presented the deal but why didn't Kreutz  just take the deal?  The coaches and the players were behind Kreutz.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 01, 2011, 12:12:13 am
Lots of one or two year contracts now.  This is due to the fact they are guaranteed.  I suspect there will be tons of one year contracts from now on.  I am not sue that is a good thing.  I prefer having the same players on a team for a bit. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 05:47:28 am
I prefer multiyear contracts as well, but you cant get locked into long term bad contracts. Players deteriorate and injuries happen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on August 01, 2011, 06:13:13 am
Boy coverage of the Bears seems really weak this year by the Chicago papers.  What has happened to Suntimes??  Their coverage blows, used to be good.  The Trib has been somewhat better but not great.


I think the media's reaction to Kreutz not coming back is funny.  They are blaming the Bears for being cheap.  I am not so sure that is the case.  Even Kreutz said he did think it was the money...it was a vibe...like they did not want him back.

Here is the reasoning in my opinion.  Bears know that he is not starter for them this year and they don't want to occupy a OL backup spot for a guy who is not in the future plans.  They want to develop some young talent.  NFL is cut throat league.  Bears usually get critized for being slow, cheap or stupid.  Personally this is a shrewed move with one eye on the future.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 01, 2011, 06:19:45 am
I imagine with Kreutz it is more a respect thing than anything. He feels like the bears disrespected him by underpaying him.
If they had offered him a 1yr 6M deal with 2M of that being some bonus for playing the pro bowl he likely would have signed that second because to his peers he signed for 6M, in the papers it says he signed for 6M.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on August 01, 2011, 06:57:42 am
Please tell me that it's true and Kreutz is really gone!  Maybe Cutler will be able to step up into the pocket this year.  Maybe "one yard up the middle" won't seem like a mile..

Good riddance, four million dollars, how ridiculous!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 07:10:59 am
Yes, this Kreutz thing is perplexing, but we all knew he was on his last leg. None of us knew if he would be good. So somebody believes they wanted to get younger, well thats when you dont expect to win crap. The Bears are talking like you have the talent to make the Superbowl. They beefed up the defensive line. You dont make the Superbowl with a center that cant pass protect or block or makes bad snaps. You dont fool around like that. If its Angelo's opinion that he has the Oline talent to make the Superbowl, he is flat out of his mind. You have to have the time to throw the ball. Cutler maybe a big boy but his life is in jeopardy with this collection of bums in front of him, Tice or no Tice
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 01, 2011, 07:19:10 am
Kreutz was old, time for a change..

And, I won't miss those damn false starts..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 07:59:32 am
Kreutz was old, time for a change..

And, I won't miss those damn false starts..

It was time for a change, but not with the crap they have for an OLine. They should have invested in some OLine talent before parting with Kreutz
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on August 01, 2011, 08:26:04 am
What happened to all the 49er interest in Kreutz?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 01, 2011, 08:28:40 am
Brad Biggs mentioned on the Score that Lance Louis is a player to look at and that it wouldn't be farfetched to see him win the RG job and keep Garza at center.  We'll see.

Also Jerry in that dumbass voice of his during his presser said, and I'm paraphrasing of course, that "you guys" (media) are so into identifying the problem, give me some names, give me some solutions, I'm into the solutions business.

Yeah, I got one solution and it's got a pink slip with your name on it. 

Then after your ass is out the door, get Tice and Ruskie into a room, look at the FA OL list, and sign 2 or 3 bodies into camp and see what ya got.

I'm not angry about the Kreutz situation.  But my goodness, has there ever been a GM this blatently incompetent and negligent in building a respectable competent NFL-worthy offensive line that is so key to the success of a franchise QB you gave up a whole galaxy for and is required for a successful NFL caliber offense no matter what damn system is being used. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 01, 2011, 08:33:39 am
I liked Olin.  I wish he was still on the Bears.

But he wanted more than he was worth.  He was offered a reasonable contract.  He turned it down.

So long.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 09:15:00 am
My quick takes on the weekend's activities:

- Corey Graham:  Glad he's back.  STs need some continuity and retaining him was huge.

- Marion Barber:  A beast of a runner when healthy but I'm wondering if his best days aren't behind him.  In which case the contract we gave him was too rich. Also wondering where that leaves Unga, the heir apparent power back who has yet to play a down for us.

- Vernon Gholston:  Surprised there was so little discussion of this one.  Outrageous measurables but miserable production in the pros. The guy was one of the biggest busts of all time with the Jets...  hopefully we aren't repeating the Gaines Adams mistake although this one at least didn't cost us a draft pick.

- Okoye:  Probably the best pickup of the weekend in terms of talent and production combined. He's only 24 and would appear to be a great fit for LoviNelli's scheme. He and Paea give us a potent young tandem at the 3-technique and we should see dramatically improved play from that position this year.

- Chris Spencer:  Has been pretty widely reviled in Seattle as a "bad" Ruskell 1st round pick, but does have size and some ability.  I would say in him we are getting a C that's considerably better than Kreutz the last few years but not as good as Kreutz was in his prime.  Biggest issue with this kid will be how fast he can pick up the line calls in Martz' scheme on a shortened preseason.

- Herman Johnson:  Sorry to see him go without even getting a shot but I'm guessing his conditioning was not up to par this offseason and the Halas Hall boys decided they didn't want to babysit him on his work ethic.

One thing that really stands out in our FA acquisitions is how many former #1 draft picks are represented in that group.  There are a lot of underachievers in that group, but there is also a lot of talent to be tapped if our coaches can find the combination. The other thing that stands out is that we really haven't improved our OL (especially OG) much at all.  Especially if the coaches aren't willing to get Carimi into the first five from the get-go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 09:19:55 am
I thought Kreutz was better than most give him credit here.   Yes he was undersized and that hurt the Bears' short yardage game but he had the legs  to generate enough speed to lead a sweep.   He did his best pass blocking when he was helping a guard or feeling where the pressure was coming and peeling off his guy to help out.  He wasn't that great one on one though.

So there were flaws in his game and the Bears were able to replace him with someone younger, bigger and cheaper and it remains to be seen if Spencer was better.  I do doubt Spencer will ever be the leader Kreutz was or be able to bring that attitude and toughness. 

Kreutz
Year Team G GS  Pen Yds False Start Holding Sacks Allwd Yds
2010 Chi  16 16    6   55      1              4        1.00      9.00

Spencer
2010 Sea 16 16   5    35       3             2        2.75      17.75

Lovie and Tice were in Kreutz' corner so I don't know why he cared about getting a bad 'vibe' from Angelo - if someone offers you a $4M contract I think they kind of want you. 

I am not going to 'Olsen' on Angelo on this deal.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 09:41:27 am
All I can say is that line is going to be a sieve. I seriously doubt Angelo intends to get any OLmen to bolster that line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 09:48:47 am
My quick takes on the weekend's activities:

- Corey Graham:  Glad he's back.  STs need some continuity and retaining him was huge.

- Marion Barber:  A beast of a runner when healthy but I'm wondering if his best days aren't behind him.  In which case the contract we gave him was too rich. Also wondering where that leaves Unga, the heir apparent power back who has yet to play a down for us.

- Vernon Gholston:  Surprised there was so little discussion of this one.  Outrageous measurables but miserable production in the pros. The guy was one of the biggest busts of all time with the Jets...  hopefully we aren't repeating the Gaines Adams mistake although this one at least didn't cost us a draft pick.

- Okoye:  Probably the best pickup of the weekend in terms of talent and production combined. He's only 24 and would appear to be a great fit for LoviNelli's scheme. He and Paea give us a potent young tandem at the 3-technique and we should see dramatically improved play from that position this year.

- Chris Spencer:  Has been pretty widely reviled in Seattle as a "bad" Ruskell 1st round pick, but does have size and some ability.  I would say in him we are getting a C that's considerably better than Kreutz the last few years but not as good as Kreutz was in his prime.  Biggest issue with this kid will be how fast he can pick up the line calls in Martz' scheme on a shortened preseason.

- Herman Johnson:  Sorry to see him go without even getting a shot but I'm guessing his conditioning was not up to par this offseason and the Halas Hall boys decided they didn't want to babysit him on his work ethic.

One thing that really stands out in our FA acquisitions is how many former #1 draft picks are represented in that group.  There are a lot of underachievers in that group, but there is also a lot of talent to be tapped if our coaches can find the combination. The other thing that stands out is that we really haven't improved our OL (especially OG) much at all.  Especially if the coaches aren't willing to get Carimi into the first five from the get-go.

 Corey Graham:  Agreed.  (Bears told him he could play CB so he signed with us!) ;)

- Marion Barber:  Yes, his best days are behind him.  Cowboys line was not good last year but was better than ours.   You never know with these skill guys when they've lost a step.  But he will bring it every play and has the hands to catch the ball too.   Do the Bears go with just one veteran between Barber and Chester Taylor?  When we had Wolfe we dressed 2 HBs and the 3rd played special teams.  What about Khalil Bell and of course Unga?

- Vernon Gholston:  Gholston was a 4-3 end at OSU.  Did the Jets play him at 3-4 DE and 3-4 LB?  He's not like our three 6-6 plus DEs we have today but more like our old 260lbs DEs from 2 years back (Brown, Ogunleye, Mark Anderson).  Definitely worth a shot.

- Okoye:  I like this offseason pickup the most.  With all these teams going 3-4 some of the 4-3 DTs just don't have a place.  He's not much older than a rookie but has 4 years experience.  DT is now our deepest position on the team with him,  Paea, Melton, Matt Toeaina, Adams and Marcus Harrison.  I just hope he has some pass rush ability.

- Chris Spencer:  Agreed.

- Herman Johnson:  You'd at least liked to have seen him in pads.






Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 10:18:17 am
I would really like to see us add a legit, big as-a-house starting OG yet.  Someone like Carl Nicks or even Leonard Davis.  Especially now with the Herman Johnson experiment over before it started, we still are very old (Garza), small (Lance Louis), or just plain not-good (Edwin and Chris Williams, Asiata) at that position.  I foresee lots of up-the-middle pass rushing and blitzing against the current interior 3.

We have thrown a lot more bodies at our DL than I would have expected this offseason...  and paid correspondingly less attention to the OL than I think any of us would have hoped...  but such is SOP at Halas Hall.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 10:32:12 am
Re Gholston, I'm pretty sure the expectation is that he will not be an every down player.

He may only be on the field for 15-18 snaps a game but if he can bring sacks and strong pressure in those limited appearances it's a worthwhile pickup, IMO.  He clearly was way overdrafted, but now that another team has absorbed that mistake maybe we can get some value out of him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 10:45:05 am
I would really like to see us add a legit, big as-a-house starting OG yet.  Someone like Carl Nicks or even Leonard Davis.  Especially now with the Herman Johnson experiment over before it started, we still are very old (Garza), small (Lance Louis), or just plain not-good (Edwin and Chris Williams, Asiata) at that position.  I foresee lots of up-the-middle pass rushing and blitzing against the current interior 3.

We have thrown a lot more bodies at our DL than I would have expected this offseason...  and paid correspondingly less attention to the OL than I think any of us would have hoped...  but such is SOP at Halas Hall.

Size helps but you also have to have someone mobile enough to pull especially with Tice's offense, but I know what you mean.   VJ's FA list showed that Carl Nicks is a RFA.  And Leonard Davis along with Columbo got much the blame for Dallas offensive line woes.  And Columbo's problem were injury related - Davis just lost it.  Don't we have enough of the Cowboys exiles?

The Bears needed to go after a guard like they went after Peppers last offseason...striking quickly. 

I also would have targetted Sidney Rice...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 10:56:06 am
IF (big if) Gholston makes the team, assuming he can beat out Wooten,  then he'd also have to beat out Idonijie and Peppers to be anything more than a part time player.

BUT, if there's an injury he's got to be able to start and play most of the game.  I don't think the Bears would sign a guy that can't play the run and is only a pure pass rusher (unless of course they could keep 4 DEs:  Wooten AND Gholston).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 11:04:23 am
Is Brian Waters still available?

He's getting old but could be a good 1 or 2 year stopgap for us much as Ruben Brown was (before the last year, when he was worthless to us).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 11:08:20 am
Re Gholston, I think it's very possible the Bears keep 4 DEs:  Peppers, Gholston, Wootton, and Izzy. I can't see the Bears giving up on Wootton after only a season, especially after that knockout sack on Favre that was arguably the defensive play of the season for the Bears last year.

And then at DT our top 4 are Adams, Toeiana, Paea and Okoye.  A SIGNIFICANT upgrade from what we've had in years past, especially on the inside.

8 DL is a lot to carry on a roster but in the LoviNelli scheme if you can't rotate fresh, quality D-Linemen for 4 quarters a game your defense is toast.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 11:18:48 am
Has anybody seen contract numbers for either Roy Williams or Chris Spencer?

I hope we're not overpaying either of them...  especially if their salaries are coming at the expense of rewarding Forte and/or getting a high-caliber OG.  Just cause those guys were 1st rounders doesn't mean they deserve a king's ransom.  Not to mention I highly doubt either of them was on very many team's short lists to acquire so we should have been able to get them at below market value.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 12:28:43 pm
Lots of one or two year contracts now.  This is due to the fact they are guaranteed.  I suspect there will be tons of one year contracts from now on.  I am not sue that is a good thing.  I prefer having the same players on a team for a bit.

I disagree.  This will put the onus on players to earn their keep sooner than later, rather than eating up a roster spot (and cap space) for 3+ years while they "develop". 

Plus, if you take on a guy and it's clear very early on that he was a mistake (not enough skills, bad attitude, injury prone, whatever), it makes it easier to cut your losses. If stiffs like Omiyale and Chris Williams had been on 2-year deals we could be showing them the door right now instead of trying to salvage their ridiculously high salaries by shoehorning them in wherever we think they might fit.

The flip side being that yeah, from a fan identification perspective, roster stability is pretty much a thing of the past.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 01, 2011, 12:48:25 pm
Re Gholston, I think it's very possible the Bears keep 4 DEs:  Peppers, Gholston, Wootton, and Izzy. I can't see the Bears giving up on Wootton after only a season, especially after that knockout sack on Favre that was arguably the defensive play of the season for the Bears last year.

And then at DT our top 4 are Adams, Toeiana, Paea and Okoye.  A SIGNIFICANT upgrade from what we've had in years past, especially on the inside.

8 DL is a lot to carry on a roster but in the LoviNelli scheme if you can't rotate fresh, quality D-Linemen for 4 quarters a game your defense is toast.

Looks like Marcus Harrison is going to be out of a job, unless someone gets hurt. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 12:50:58 pm
I think Marcus Harrison has already been cut.  Yet another 3rd round BUST for the Jer and the 3rd FAIL at the same position with the same pick (Dusty Dvoracek and Jarron Gilbert also having been 3rd rounders).

And actually in my initial DL rundown I forgot about Henry Melton so that's potentially 9 D-Linemen active on game day.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 12:51:43 pm
Re Gholston, I think it's very possible the Bears keep 4 DEs:  Peppers, Gholston, Wootton, and Izzy. I can't see the Bears giving up on Wootton after only a season, especially after that knockout sack on Favre that was arguably the defensive play of the season for the Bears last year.

And then at DT our top 4 are Adams, Toeiana, Paea and Okoye.  A SIGNIFICANT upgrade from what we've had in years past, especially on the inside.

8 DL is a lot to carry on a roster but in the LoviNelli scheme if you can't rotate fresh, quality D-Linemen for 4 quarters a game your defense is toast.

Yeah, Wooten had that ONE sack, but he's got to show more in the preseason.  Last year he beat out the pool jumper...this year he might have to beat out Gholston.  I like going with 4 DEs

No way would I leave out Melton out of the top 4 DTs.  In fact, I rate him numero uno.  Melton, Paea, Okoye, and Adams appear to be locks.   Toeaina could stay if the go with 3 DEs (Melton has played DE for depth).   I am not that down on Harrison but given his start this year it doesn't look good for him
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 01, 2011, 12:54:30 pm
Yap, Roy signed for 1 year, 2 mil and Spencer 2 year, 6 mil.  As far as I know, Waters is available and no teams have been talking to him yet.

The Bears needed to go after a guard like they went after Peppers last offseason...striking quickly. 

And they had the money to get a Dahl or a Joseph or an Asomugha/Joseph/Cromartie.  Someone posted an article stating that the minimum floor for spending under the cap wouldn't take effect until 2013.  Jerry and Lovie aren't on the hot seat anymore.  There's no urgency to stand at anybodys doorstep with a pen in hand like last year.  Take bat crazy Jerry Jones.  He makes dumbass moves but IIRC the cowgirls were over the cap, unloaded some salary (which the Bears happily swooped in on) and made a play for some big FAs like Asomugha.  Again, there's no urgency in the Bears camp after blowing a golden opportunity last year and that's what really gets me pi$$ed.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 12:55:09 pm
I would hate to see Toeiana lose out in the numbers game.  IMO he brings at least as much to the table today (if not more) than Adams, and at his age he still has room to improve. 

Anthony Adams is a decent player but I did not consider him a priority signing. To keep Adams at big money and potentially lose an equivalent, younger guy like Toeiana who still has 5 or 6 years left in the tank would be pennywise and pound foolish.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 01:00:02 pm
Yap, Roy signed for 1 year, 2 mil and Spencer 2 year, 6 mil.

Assuming both of those guys have decent seasons, those are numbers I can live with. 

Marion Barber at 2 yrs for 5 mil seems like a bit more of an overpay given his declining skills and the people we already have on the roster to do the same thing.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 01:05:26 pm
I'm starting to resign myself to the fact that a top-flight OG is not coming into the fold.  We have a lot of bodies at OG but no players... but apparently Angelo & Co. are OK with that.

Whatever money and bandwidth is left is pretty much going to have to the 1,000-lb gorilla in the room, which is the Matt Forte extension. That deal has got to get done, and soon .  Without Forte this offense will be worse than awful and Cutler will be on IR before October.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 01:09:41 pm
yapper

I agree with you about Toeiana over Adams.  Toeiana is 5 years younger and has more pass rush ability, but the coaching staff really likes Adams (started 16 games in 2010).  It will be interesting to see where Paea and Okoye fit in - are they going to be 4-3 NT tackle types or can they put pressure on the QB.

I know we'll have great depth but you'd like to see Melton, Okoye, or Paea really dominate.  Or all 3!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 01:17:07 pm
The way I see it, Melton and Okoye are the pure 3-Techniques (Tommie Harris' old position), while Adams and Toeiana are the NTs (or whatever the non 3-Tech is called in that scheme).  Paea, is a bit athletically challenged to play the 3T but is also quite small for a NT so it will be interesting to see where he establishes himself or if he is more of a situational player who swings between both DT positions depending on the scenario and who else is on the field.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 01:39:43 pm
I'm not really sure about Toeaina (6-2 308).  When Harris was benched last season Toeaina took his spot (10 starts in 2010).  So he might be considered a 3 technique too.

It might be that Adams and Marcus Harrison are the only NT types.  Not sure about Paea - his is small compared to the rest at 6-1 303.

Okoye had 44 tackles for Houston last year...that's more than any DT on our team.  That tells me he might be more of a NT and he has pretty good size at 6-2 315.  He also had 3 sacks.

It probably doesn't matter as we'll be rotating 4 or 5 of them in throughout a game anyway.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on August 01, 2011, 02:03:39 pm
Don't forget Paea is one of the strongest players ever coming out of college.  He played the nose in college and probably can fill that role some during a game if asked to.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 01, 2011, 03:43:45 pm
Agreed, Paea is freak strong and at 6'1 should be able to win the leverage battle, especially against some of the taller Cs and OGs in the league. He's also a former rugby player so that tells you he's tough as nails and has a high pain threshold.

It would be great fun to see him giving the shake-off to guys half a foot taller and 50 lbs heavier and getting in QBs faces on a regular basis.

If nothing else, our interior OL should be forced to step-up their game going against young and hungry studs like Paea, Okoye and Melton in practice. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 05:27:56 pm
Herman Johnson:  You'd at least liked to have seen him in pads.

I dont believe he was ever off the practice squad.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 01, 2011, 06:20:57 pm
So as it sits the Bears offensive line using a Martz offense is good to go.  Against those two young monsters playing for the Lions. Or GB again. Or Philly. Somebody needs to call the Jer and tell him the 8mm film he's using broke. He's seeing the same plays over and over again from when those guys were good. Like in High school. How many sacks did Cutler take?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 06:24:25 pm
It seems that Angelo believes Kreutz was the problem on the OLine. Kreuts wasnt the problem it was Angelo not investing on the development of an OLine. This year is going to really show who is right and who is wrong. Can a line be built with castoffs and low round draft picks? Or will the lack of talent show to the point that the record prevents them from the playoffs? Defensively we seem primed for brilliance, offensively we dont look good to me.  What happens if Cuttler goes down with a season ending injury? Who gets the blame? Tice for not developing the trash he has been given to work with? Or does the blame fall where it belongs on the shoulders of Angelo?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 01, 2011, 06:28:51 pm
I agree that the OL was as bad as the DL last year.  And I agree that the DL was favored in the off season activity.  But I don't like to split my efforts between two problems.  I don't care which side he tried to improve, as long as he concentrated on one of the other, but not both.

Next season, he can move on to the Offensive Line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 01, 2011, 06:38:41 pm
Seriously why not improve both?

I love the additions to the D-line but our O-line sux azz!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 01, 2011, 06:56:30 pm
Kreutz was offered 3 million.  Then he was offered 4 million.  I don't think that the front office thought he had lost it, but I think they decided they didn't have time to dance with him.  No one will pay him 4 million other than us, and he turned it down.  If that wasn't a consideration to what he had done for us in the past, nothing is.

The front office and coaching staff wanted him at their price, higher than anyone else would pay.  This falls on Kreutz, he overplayed his hand and lost.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 01, 2011, 07:15:26 pm
If there's one thing that's glaringly obvious about all this,it's that the Bears No. 1 main priority is the DL. Everything else is a distant 2nd,3rd,etc. If there's another thing that's glaringly obvious,it's that most fans will say the OL should have been the No.1 priority,THEN the DL,etc etc. I don't know how this will all play out,but I think it's gonna be ugly for Cutler behind center for quite a few games.....again.

    On Kreutz, he at best was going to be a one year, last shot wonder anyway so losing him hurts but not as bad as I think some are thinking it will be. With the lack of practice time and the lack of jelling together, it's gonna be Keystone Kops for awhile. Hopefully they'll get it together much quicker than it took last years group.

   As for Barber, he's on the downleg of his career. Probably a very similar situation to what we thought of Taylor coming in last season. WOW! Great! Oh boy! And then....hmmm....so THAT'S why Dallas let him go,ehh? I pray it is nothing even CLOSE to what happened with Manumalelooney.....he went from good to lower than dirt in one year....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 01, 2011, 07:54:13 pm
It took forever to find where your forum moved too.
I like the Marion Barber signing alot.

 Hi JoJo !
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 08:18:40 pm
If Barber has anything left Chester Taylor is a goner
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 01, 2011, 08:27:39 pm
Taylor was an unusual choice last year.  He was quite good, for a small man, at goal line plunges.  But he was not as good as a larger back would be.  I think the Bears had him because they wanted a replacement for Forte if he declined in production.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 01, 2011, 08:28:26 pm
http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/grizzly-detail/RAW__Olin_Kruetz_s_Exit_Interview_Chicago-126553263.html

After watching this video I think Kruetz was ready to retire he just wanted a push.  I don't think he wanted to be the one to "quit" on his teammates.  This way is easier for him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 01, 2011, 09:05:32 pm
Bears still have $24 million in salary cap space (http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2011/08/bears_still_have_24_million_in.html)

By Sean Jensen on August 1, 2011 5:57 PM

After a flurry of veteran transactions -- including the trade of Greg Olsen, the release of Brandon Manumaleuna and the addition of players such as Roy Williams, Marion Barber, Amobi Okoye, Chris Spencer and Vernon Gholston -- the Bears are still $24 million under the salary cap of $120 million, according to two league sources.  Entering free agency, the Bears were among the top five teams in the league, in terms of space, with $34 million.  Despite the volume of players, the Bears handed out mostly modest, short-term deals.  They also kept their own, signing starters like Anthony Adams and Nick Roach, and adding other key role players like punter Adam Podlesh, tight end Matt Spaeth and receiver Sam Hurd.  Although they have plenty of space, the Bears can use up much of it with an expected extension of running back Matt Forte soon and other extensions for players later in the season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 01, 2011, 09:21:19 pm
I don't get into the twitter stuff and I don't have an account.  But it is can get a little addicting to get real time updates (http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23Bears) and some pix re:  practice...

Briggs picks off a pass from Cutler...Oh snap, Lance Briggs limps off after a collision with some WR named Jones...oh Lance is okay...Sanzenbacher playing with the ones making nice catches...Tim Jennings drops a pick...blah blah blah...

Bears sign former saints DT Anthony Hargrove (http://www.examiner.com/new-orleans-saints-in-new-orleans/espn-reports-the-saints-dt-anthony-hargrove-signs-with-chicago-bears)

The New Orleans Saints have reportedly lost one of their defensive tackles and one of the most heart-warming stories to ever step out onto a football field. ESPN is reporting that free agent DT Anthony Hargrove has signed with the Chicago Bears, ending his time in the BIg Easy.  Hargrove's story is one of great triumph as he was once in drug rehab, dealt with many hard times, and was thought that he would never play in the NFL again. Yet he came back stronger than ever and won a Super Bowl ring with the New Orleans Saints of 2009.  No details are known at this time regarding Hargrove's deal with the Bears, but more is to come as it it revealed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 09:47:52 pm
Oh fantastic! Another DT. Hey how about an OG or OT? Like how many DTs do we need on the roster?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 01, 2011, 09:56:24 pm
For the love of God, doesn't anyone in the front office realize there are TWO front lines on a football team that have to be good?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 10:01:01 pm
Before I add my own WTF post.  I looked up Hargrove, he's 28 and he's a backup DE not DT.  He's only 6-3 272 so somebody mistyped his position.

Had one sack last year - no starts with the Saints in 2010.  5 sacks in the Saints SB 2009 season.

He's competition for Corey Wooten and Vernon Gholstein. 





Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 10:19:18 pm
Before I add my own WTF post.  I looked up Hargrove, he's 28 and he's a backup DE not DT.  He's only 6-3 272 so somebody mistyped his position.

Had one sack last year - no starts with the Saints in 2010.  5 sacks in the Saints SB 2009 season.

He's competition for Corey Wooten and Vernon Gholstein.

Well if we judge by the numbers he isnt much competition.

We still need an OG at a minimum. I'd like to move Lance Lewis to TE
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 10:28:46 pm
Well if we judge by the numbers he isnt much competition.

We still need an OG at a minimum. I'd like to move Lance Lewis to TE

Wooten had one sack all season and Gholston had none - Hargrove is perfect competition.  Good signing - let's see what he can do.

Lance Louis at TE?  We can't afford to lose any more guards.  After Johnson was cut and now Garza is playing center.  Louis just might win the RG job. 

And I don't even know how well he can catch - oh wait....Martz doesn't care about that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 01, 2011, 10:38:38 pm
I personally think our D-line is going to be awesome this year.

It is the O-line I am worried about.  Angello just has a blind spot for it.  If they realize how important the D-line is how can they not see how important the O-line is?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 01, 2011, 10:44:03 pm
Wooten had one sack all season and Gholston had none - Hargrove is perfect competition.  Good signing - let's see what he can do.

Lance Louis at TE?  We can't afford to lose any more guards.  After Johnson was cut and now Garza is playing center.  Louis just might win the RG job. 

And I don't even know how well he can catch - oh wait....Martz doesn't care about that.

Louis was a TE in college
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 01, 2011, 11:00:09 pm
D-line will be deep, but we still need another pass rusher.  We knew Peppers would be good and Idonijie surprised but who else is there?  Maybe Melton...Paea....Okoye???

Here's Pat Kirwan's top 40 available FAs:

1. Zach Miller, Raiders, TE (should be first signed)
2. Ahmad Bradshaw, Giants, RB (Re-signed with New York)
3. Braylon Edwards, Jets, WR
4. Kevin Boss, Giants, TE
5. Roman Harper, Saints, S (Re-signed with New Orleans)
6. Aubrayo Franklin, 49ers, NT
7. Carlos Rogers, Redskins, CB
8. Dashon Goldson, 49ers, S
9. Shaun Ellis, Jets, DE
10. Jason Snelling, Falcons, RB
11. Le'Ron McClain, Ravens, FB
12. Cadillac Williams, Bucs, RB
13. Manny Lawson, 49ers, OLB
14. Derrick Mason, Ravens, WR
15. Shaun O'Hara, Giants, C
16. Leonard Davis, Cowboys, G
17. Brian Waters, Chiefs, G
18. Marc Bulger, Ravens, QB
19. Brodney Pool, Jets, S
20. Tully Banta-Cain, Patriots, OLB
21. Madison Hedgecock, Giants, FB
22. Ronnie Brown, Dolphins, RB
23. Matt Roth, Browns, OLB/DE
24. Max Starks, Steelers, OT
25. Brady Poppinga, Packers, OLB
26. Ty Warren, Patriots, DE
27. Lofa Tatupu, Seahawks, MLB
28. Malcom Floyd, Chargers, WR
29. Olin Kreutz, Bears, C
30. Donte Whitner, Bills, S
31. Terrell Owens, Bengals, WR
32. Charlie Johnson, Colts, OT (Signed with Minnesota)
33. Ben Leber, Vikings, LB
34. Pat Williams, Vikings, NT
35. Steve Smith, Giants, WR
36. Stylez G. White, Bucs, DE
37. Bo Scaife, Titans, TE
38. Rocky McIntosh, Redskins, LB
39. Dhani Jones, Bengals, MLB
40. Gerald Sensabaugh, Cowboys, S
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on August 01, 2011, 11:42:06 pm
wHAT????
Dhani Jones, the self proclaimed 7th best linebacker is number 49???
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 02, 2011, 01:12:23 am
Anyone wanna help rent a plane to fly over practice with 'What about the Offensive Line?!?' on a huge banner? lol....it's almost comical if it weren't so pathetic....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 05:25:57 am
My bad.

Hold off the Hargrove parade.  There was no official signing as of today.

WHAT ABOUT THE OFFENSIVE LINE!?!?!?!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 07:50:21 am
Its slowly coming to me that they have pencilled in Chris Williams at LOG and they arent going to budge. They are bound and determined to find a place for him because they refuse to admitt a mistake was made in drafting him, despite other good options available in free agency.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 07:53:41 am
My bad.

Hold off the Hargrove parade.  There was no official signing as of today.

WHAT ABOUT THE OFFENSIVE LINE!?!?!?!

Thank God. Seriously, we have put more than enough time and money into the DL. A 2nd round draft pick and two young, big-name FAs should be enough shiny new toys to make even Marinelli happy.  Now, how about some help for the OL and especially OG please?

Meanwhile the top OGs on our roster according to camp reports are Chris Williams, Lance Louis, Roberto Garza and possible a conversion project with Chris Spencer.  Really?  Blecchh. 

Cutler has got to be crapping his pants. New WRs, no Olsen, new C, shi-tty OGs and both OTs playing out of position (Webb left, Carimi right).

I hope Tice knows what the hell he's doing cause right now it looks like another half season (at least) of experimenting with OL combinations and it doesn't look like Angie is gonna open the checkbook for any more legit players at those positions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 07:55:31 am
Yup and despite being 24 Mill under the cap
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 02, 2011, 08:15:02 am
I guess it is obvious that Angelo is bargain shopping and there were a lot of bargains out there.
My biggest problem with all the 1 year deals is that if some of these guys really turn it on we won't be able to keep them.

Maybe the plan is to see how they do and then offer an extension later this year.
I do like the pickups of Gholston and the DT Okoye (sp?)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 08:23:19 am
My biggest problem with all the 1 year deals is that if some of these guys really turn it on we won't be able to keep them.

Well if you assume this is Angelo's last season with the Bears, it makes perfect sense.  If all these acquisitions fail and they have to blow up half the roster next offseason, it's not his problem.  If they all do great and want big contracts to stick around, that's somebody else's problem, too.  Angelo has approached this entire offseason like a man with nothing to lose...  I just wish that go-for-broke mentality would extend to the OL.

Also, WTH is taking so long with the Forte deal?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 08:41:11 am
It does appear to be Angie's swansong. But why not sign an OG and at least go for a ring before you leave? Which brings me back to my point about not admitting failure on Chris Williams
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 08:56:06 am
Carl Nicks, albeit an RFA, resigned with NO.  Waters, Seubert, and others (http://www.kffl.com/static/nfl/features/freeagents/fa.php?option=OL&y=2011) are still available.  We are currently 24 mil under the cap.

I am also resigned to the fact that Angie is staying put and putting the onus on Tice to play the kids and desperately keep Williams off the bench.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on August 02, 2011, 09:14:32 am
This has got to be happening because Tice believes they are better off molding what they have in camp rather than bringing in new players.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 09:20:34 am
I can offer no excuse for the play of Chris Williams at LT last season.  But he's playing LG now, a position he was thrown into after he recovered from his injury suffered in the Dallas game, and had to learn on the job.   He's always been a tackle far as I know.

Tice is talking up Louis, saying that if Spencer wins the center job, Garza gets his RG spot back and Louis competes with Williams on the left side.

With all these changes and with 2 new players at the OT spots, I think we should let Caleb Hanie start the first PS game...



Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 09:26:30 am
With all these changes and with 2 new players at the OT spots, I think we should let Caleb Hanie start the first PS game...

Agreed. Cutler needs reps with the WRs...  but he needs his health far more.

As for the OL depth chart, it looks like Omiyale will drop to 2nd string as the [very overpaid] backup swing OT...  although possibly winning back the starting spot at LT if J'Marcus struggles a lot there early on.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 09:33:13 am
Carl Nicks, albeit an RFA, resigned with NO.  Waters, Seubert, and others (http://www.kffl.com/static/nfl/features/freeagents/fa.php?option=OL&y=2011) are still available.  We are currently 24 mil under the cap.

I am also resigned to the fact that Angie is staying put and putting the onus on Tice to play the kids and desperately keep Williams off the bench.

So it seems we are stuck with Louis, Asiata and  C. Williams to fight for a job at LG and maybe E Williams although he could be backup center. Then there is the UDFA out of Georgia who is sort of an unknown wild card.

Thats not awe inspiring to say the least
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 09:40:13 am
So it seems we are stuck with Louis, Asiata and  C. Williams to fight for a job at LG and maybe E Williams although he could be backup center. Then there is the UDFA out of Georgia who is sort of an unknown wild card.

Thats not awe inspiring to say the least

Like I said before, except for drafting Carimi and the Kruetz / Spencer swapout, the effort and resources expended to significantly improve this OL has been nil. With all the new people learning new positions I think BEST-case scenario would be for the OL to pick up where it left off last season. Improvement over last year out the gate simply isn't going to happen and regression (at least in the early going) is very likely.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 02, 2011, 09:55:03 am
Saw some pics of Carimi from practice wtih pads.  He looks the part.  Thing strong legs, just what I want to see on OT.  Not spindly legs like Chris Williams. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 10:01:37 am
Saw some pics of Carimi from practice wtih pads.  He looks the part.  Thing strong legs, just what I want to see on OT.  Not spindly legs like Chris Williams.

Lot of players look the part in training camp...let's see what he can do when has to hit opponents. 

Chris Williams got exposed last season cuz he couldn't move those spindly legs quickly enough and didn't have the reach to consistently get his hands on the DEs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 10:03:11 am
I have no problem in overypaying Omiyale as the swing tackle...beats having Kevn Shaffer.  Assuming Webb and Carimi can nail down the positions you can bring in a younger (read cheaper) swing tackle next season, but not just yet.

As for Omiyale, I think he needs to play some guard too.  Why not throw him into the guard mess...mix too?  He played it in 2009.

I think the UDFA out of Georgia is being played at tackle.  Josh Davis?

For this team to succeed early on given our O-line situation, Martz is going to have to tweek the offense and not expose Cutler to hsi pass heavy playcalling as he did in the early part of last year (and inexplicably in the finale at Green Bay).

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 10:21:57 am
For this team to succeed early on given our O-line situation, Martz is going to have to tweek the offense and not expose Cutler to hsi pass heavy playcalling as he did in the early part of last year (and inexplicably in the finale at Green Bay).

And it's Lovie's responsibility as head coach to rein the bastard in when he goes into mad Mike mode.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 10:25:16 am
Maybe we ought to lock up Angelo in a dark room and play this on an endless loop...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkPS8Az5IV8
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 10:29:45 am
You could show him that clip for a week on end and he still wouldn't care. He has the strategic thinking capability of a gnat.

Angelo's the type of guy that would spend $200G on a brand new Ferrari and then leave it parked outside year-round, put low-grade gas in the tank and never do any maintenance on it... and then wonder why after 2 years it looks like crap and won't start.

That's exactly how he's treated Cutler the whole time he's been here. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 10:47:16 am
Thing is the Bears dipped their feet into the cold water by reportedly offering (http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11209/1163623-100.stm) Colon $32 million almost a week ago.  A tackle.  A position they drafted for in the first round and now they seem to be fairly content going with Webb/Carimi.

My question is...why did they stop there?

I understand they want to play the kids, who were mostly 7th rounders or UDFAs, to see if they can play and develop some continuity which is way more important than on the DL.  But they don't have to wait for a jailbreak in the 1st and 2nd preseason game and hurry Cutler to the sideline like last year and THEN sign who's left on the street.  Why not get the street help now before the injuries and self evalution induced need start to spring up around the league and guys like Waters get swooped up.

It's mindboggling.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 11:25:57 am

At 6-3 315 I bet they may have projected Colon as a guard.   May be why he re-signed with Pittsburgh.

The thing I noticed about the FA guards is that a lot of them signed with their old teams.  We really don't know how many Angelo went after.

I think we'll be OK at guard, especially if Spencer can move Garza back to RG, I'm more concerned about both tackle positions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 11:39:42 am

It was hard to look at that Giant game replay.

Manu gave up 2 sacks.
Omiyale was in on 3 sacks.
Shaffer in limited play was in on 2 1/2.
Olsen had 1.
Kreutz and Louis shared one.
One coverage sack.

Most, not all the pressure, came from the outside.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 11:46:58 am
It was hard to look at that Giant game replay.

Manu gave up 2 sacks.
Omiyale was in on 3 sacks.
Shaffer in limited play was in on 2 1/2.
Olsen had 1.
Kreutz and Louis shared one.
One coverage sack.

Well, by my math, the participants in 6 of those sacks are no longer on the team. So that's something anyway, I guess.

I'm starting to wonder why Brian Waters is still on the market. Is there something physically wrong with him besides getting up there in years? Does he want too much money?  This is a 5-time Pro Bowler, 2-Time All Pro and 2009 NFL Man of the Year player we're talking about.  Those guys don't grow on trees and it seems to me he'd be a slam-dunk as a 1- or 2-year "bridge option" (a la Ruben Brown) till our younger OGs are ready to step in. It doesn't surprise me that the Bears aren't showing interest but I'm surprised no one else seems to be, either.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 12:04:04 pm
Lot of players look the part in training camp...let's see what he can do when has to hit opponents. 

Chris Williams got exposed last season cuz he couldn't move those spindly legs quickly enough and didn't have the reach to consistently get his hands on the DEs.

Plus he has short arms and they can get underneath himn and get leverage on him
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 12:11:53 pm
It was hard to look at that Giant game replay.

Manu gave up 2 sacks.
Omiyale was in on 3 sacks.
Shaffer in limited play was in on 2 1/2.
Olsen had 1.
Kreutz and Louis shared one.
One coverage sack.

Most, not all the pressure, came from the outside.

So why wasnt Omiyale cut too? And why wasnt Chris Williams listed?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 12:23:34 pm
Plus he has short arms and they can get underneath himn and get leverage on him

The prototype OG body type is short (6'3, maybe 6'4 tops) and squatty with a huge azz and long arms. Chris Williams is exactly the opposite of that. 

How Angelo determined this guy was ever an NFL caliber OT...  or hell, OL of any kind... is beyond me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 12:31:29 pm
So why wasnt Omiyale cut too? And why wasnt Chris Williams listed?

Omiyale has been benched while the 2 youngsters prove themselves at tackle.  He's the insurance policy.

Don't think Williams played that game - was probably still recovering from his injury.   Omiyale was at LT, Garza was moved to LG, Lance Louis started at RG then got injured and Edwin Williams replaced him later on, and Shaffer started at RT and J'Marcus Webb replaced him during the game.

Though many don't want to admit it Garza is probably the best o-lineman right now on the team.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 12:33:47 pm

I kind of forgot about him (like the Bears did last year), but it looks like Des Clark may be coming back.  I'll take him over Spaeth as a starter, but I'd like to see Kellen Davis win the job.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 12:37:46 pm
Omiyale has been benched while the 2 youngsters prove themselves at tackle.  He's the insurance policy.

Don't think Williams played that game - was probably still recovering from his injury.   Omiyale was at LT, Garza was moved to LG, Lance Louis started at RG then got injured and Edwin Williams replaced him later on, and Shaffer started at RT and J'Marcus Webb replaced him during the game.

Yup... the whole right side of our OL in particular was just brutal that game. Both Louis and Ed Williams got their azzes handed to them play after play, and Shaffer was a turnstile. IIRC didn't one of the Giants DEs get 2.5 or 3 sacks that game and then afterward it was revealed that guy was playing on two bad legs.  Worst single game performance by an OL I have seen in my life.  Ever, at any level.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 12:40:39 pm
I kind of forgot about him (like the Bears did last year), but it looks like Des Clark may be coming back.

In an offseason full of questionable moves, that one would be downright stupid.  They had no use for him last year, how has anything changed?

Agreed, it's Kellen Davis' time. He's done solid work on teams and shown some nice flashes in limited reps at TE.  And he is just a beast of a target at 6'7, 262 (still remembering how he knocked that Seahawks DB out of the game that tried to go low on him).

Some clips to fire up the Kellen love...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpe4IxDrNpE&feature=related
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 12:47:33 pm
No need to post the vid here, but I just finished watching the Raiders/Bears preseason clips from last year...the one where that Wimbley kid had 4 sacks in the first half.  Who did he line up against for most of his sacks?  Chris Williams.  Him being tall, having short arms, and slow feet was on full display that game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 12:54:16 pm
Yup I remember tracking that Raiders game and thinking, it's gonna be a LO_O_O_NG season with this OL.

Doesn't matter that it was "just preseason"...  it was clear that Chris Williams was in over his head against a good (not great) NFL DE.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 12:56:59 pm
In an offseason full of questionable moves, that one would be downright stupid.  They had no use for him last year, how has anything changed?

Agreed, it's Kellen Davis' time. He's done solid work on teams and shown some nice flashes in limited reps at TE.  And he is just a beast of a target at 6'7, 262 (still remembering how he knocked that Seahawks DB out of the game that tried to go low on him).


For one thing we had 4 TEs last year, now we only have two.  If he can still play why not?  Most likely they'll give the 3rd TE spot to one of the UDFA rookies - they still need more special teams bodies.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on August 02, 2011, 01:07:00 pm
Hey!  Nice new house you guys have here!  Love what you've done to the place.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 01:15:48 pm
For one thing we had 4 TEs last year, now we only have two.  If he can still play why not?  Most likely they'll give the 3rd TE spot to one of the UDFA rookies - they still need more special teams bodies.

Right, so Kellen Davis and Matt Spaeth and an UDFA = 3 TEs. 

Still not seeing where there's room for Dez.  If they think bringing in a 2nd pass catching TE is necessary to "push" Kellen, then I think they are insulting and underestimating Kellen...  the kid is ready for prime time if the coaches will finally just grow a pair and give him the keys.

Unless they're seeing Dez as the replacement for Manu who wasn't technically a TE although listed as one.  He's a whole different player than Manu, though...  albeit a better one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 01:24:23 pm
August 1 Practice Observations

By Sean Jensen on August 1, 2011 10:30 PM|

It was a muggy night here at ONU, under the lights. Several of the players complained coming off the field, including second-round pick Stephen Paea.

THE HIGHS
 * The best play I saw tonight was by Jimmy Young, a 6 foot 1, undrafted rookie receiver out of TCU. He looked over one shoulder then the other and still made the catch. Very high degree of difficulty, and he didn't bobble it at all.

* Undrafted rookie receiver Dane Sanzenbacher out of Ohio State also made a handful of catches, looking very solid out there. He also took advantage of Roy Williams and Sam Hurd not being able to practice until Thursday, running with the starters when Johnny Knox had to get worked on briefly on the sideline.

* Nickel corner D.J. Moore picked off a pass from quarterback Matt Gutierrez. Moore made the catch look routine, which makes him such an exciting player, as he showcased often last year.

* Running back Matt Forte, who is cut up like a rock, showed his explosiveness down the left sideline. It wasn't full contact, but he definitely seemed to surprise safety Major WRight with his speed.

* Receiver Devin Hester hauled in a 50-plus yard touchdown. He made it look easy.

THE LOWS
 * Cornerback Tim Jennings had a forgettable evening, giving up a handful of plays in a one-on-one drill. Jennings was also beaten on Hester's 50-yard touchdown. And he also dropped a pick.

* The equipment staff might want to fit rookie offensive tackle Gabe Carimi with some new cleats. He slipped several times during two-on-two blocking drills. Or maybe it's because Israel Idonije and Corey Wootton just overwhelmed him.

* Left guard Chris Williams, who is currently running with the starters, ended up on the ground on consecutive plays during two-on-twos.

* It was a bit frustrating, since so many key players can't practice until Thursday, due to the new CBA rules. So fans -- and reporters -- who showed up didn't get to check out receiver Roy Williams jump over defenders, Adam Podlesh drop a punt inside the five, or how Chris Spencer looks snapping the ball.

* Punter Spencer Lanning looked solid, and I erred in saying he was Podlesh on a Twitter posting.

Game ball goes to... the young kid. Dane Sanzenbacher. I'm sure he'll cry when we give him the award.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 01:28:42 pm
August 1 Practice Observations

By Sean Jensen on August 1, 2011 10:30 PM|

It was a muggy night here at ONU, under the lights. Several of the players complained coming off the field, including second-round pick Stephen Paea.

THE HIGHS
 * The best play I saw tonight was by Jimmy Young, a 6 foot 1, undrafted rookie receiver out of TCU. He looked over one shoulder then the other and still made the catch. Very high degree of difficulty, and he didn't bobble it at all.

* Undrafted rookie receiver Dane Sanzenbacher out of Ohio State also made a handful of catches, looking very solid out there. He also took advantage of Roy Williams and Sam Hurd not being able to practice until Thursday, running with the starters when Johnny Knox had to get worked on briefly on the sideline.

* Nickel corner D.J. Moore picked off a pass from quarterback Matt Gutierrez. Moore made the catch look routine, which makes him such an exciting player, as he showcased often last year.

* Running back Matt Forte, who is cut up like a rock, showed his explosiveness down the left sideline. It wasn't full contact, but he definitely seemed to surprise safety Major WRight with his speed.

* Receiver Devin Hester hauled in a 50-plus yard touchdown. He made it look easy.

THE LOWS
 * Cornerback Tim Jennings had a forgettable evening, giving up a handful of plays in a one-on-one drill. Jennings was also beaten on Hester's 50-yard touchdown. And he also dropped a pick.

* The equipment staff might want to fit rookie offensive tackle Gabe Carimi with some new cleats. He slipped several times during two-on-two blocking drills. Or maybe it's because Israel Idonije and Corey Wootton just overwhelmed him.

* Left guard Chris Williams, who is currently running with the starters, ended up on the ground on consecutive plays during two-on-twos.

* It was a bit frustrating, since so many key players can't practice until Thursday, due to the new CBA rules. So fans -- and reporters -- who showed up didn't get to check out receiver Roy Williams jump over defenders, Adam Podlesh drop a punt inside the five, or how Chris Spencer looks snapping the ball.

* Punter Spencer Lanning looked solid, and I erred in saying he was Podlesh on a Twitter posting.

Game ball goes to... the young kid. Dane Sanzenbacher. I'm sure he'll cry when we give him the award.

So basically our skill players and CB look great and our OL looks like shi-t.

The more things change, the more they stay the same I guess.

Re Major Wright...  I was never a big fan of Daniele Manning but I have some real questions as to whether Wright is ready to start just yet.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 02:05:39 pm
Right, so Kellen Davis and Matt Spaeth and an UDFA = 3 TEs. 

Still not seeing where there's room for Dez.  If they think bringing in a 2nd pass catching TE is necessary to "push" Kellen, then I think they are insulting and underestimating Kellen...  the kid is ready for prime time if the coaches will finally just grow a pair and give him the keys.

Unless they're seeing Dez as the replacement for Manu who wasn't technically a TE although listed as one.  He's a whole different player than Manu, though...  albeit a better one.

Last year we had 4 TEs for whatever reason.  This year we have 2.  Even if we only have 3 there could be room for Clark if the team wants an experienced backup who can both block and catch.  As I said before if one of the UDFAs shows potential and can play STs then you don't bring Clark back.

The only threat I see for Kellen is Spaeth not Clark - Martz like those block first TEs and Kellen is not one of those.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 02:09:55 pm
Last year we had 4 TEs and no fullbacks...so why do we have 2 fullbacks in camp? 

If I'm Will Ta'ufo'oull or Eddie Williams I'm wondering if my agent knows what he's doing.


Also will be interesting if the Bears try to stash the rookie QB on the PS - we all know what happened last year.  With 15 defensive tackles we're going to have to cut back somewhere.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 02, 2011, 02:14:31 pm
Frank Omiyale was horrid at G and barely passable at RT.  He only did "decent" at LT.  Counting on him for multiple positions doesnt seem like a very good idea to me.  And if Chris Williams is head and shoulders better this year, I wouldnt mind seeing him cut. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 02:27:35 pm

Omiyale played some of the worst guard I've ever seen the first part of 2009.  A new position for him.  But when he came back after riding the bench a few games he was...OK.

And right now if someone is OK at his position he has an excellent chance of starting for the Bears.  Or in other words who sucks the least starts the most.

And I wouldn't cut Omiyale just yet.  We know what he can do at LT.   We have no idea what Webb can do at LT nor Carimi at RT.  (I wonder if Webb looks as good as Carimi in shorts...)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 02:38:59 pm
I wouldnt cut Omiyale either. We do need a backup or swing tackle
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 02:40:37 pm
As much as I rag on Martz, it was nice to see him say on record in a diplomatic way that we could use some OL depth.  Whether that restarts the FA wheels in the genius bar remains to be seen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 02:59:49 pm
I wouldnt cut Omiyale either. We do need a backup or swing tackle

IIRC Lovie's SOP is to dress only 7 OL on game day.  Never more than 8.  So if the season started today those 7 would be:

- Webb  (LT)
- Carimi  (RT)
- Chris Williams  (starting LG or backup OG)
- Spencer  (C or RG)
- Garza  (RG or C)
- Omiyale (swing backup OT)
- Louis (starting LG or backup OG)

Then you have Edwin Williams and Josh Asiata who saw very limited game action last year, as well as Levi Horn and one or two other guys from last year's PS (I would presume anyway)... and then the UDFAs.  Not a whole lot of veteran "go-to" talent among the whole bunch, to be sure. In fact if one of the young guys were to send Garza to the bench we would have one of the youngest starting 5's in the entire league.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 04:10:33 pm
My wish is we could get a starting LG and cut Williams, but I really doubt C Williams will get cut as long as Angelo is GM. I just dont like this line even if Webb is improved. Especially with the studs the Lions have.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 04:39:33 pm
Kind of interesting going through the roster on Chicagobears.com.  There have been some changes from last year in the "listed" weights of some players.  I'm going off memory on all these from last year but I think I'm pretty close.

Gabe Carimi - 316, I believe this is significantly lighter than he played in college.

Jay Cutler - 220, this is at least 10 lbs lighter than last year and may be an even bigger difference as he looked heavier than his listed 230 at times last year.

Kellen Davis - 267, this is 5 lbs heavier than last year

Israel Idonije - 275, up 5 from last year

Lance Louis - 320, a MAJOR jump from last year when I recall him listed at around 305; hopefully this is muscle weight

Henry Melton - 295, another big weight gain from either 275 or maybe even 265 last year

Amobi Okoye - 292, much lower than his listed weight was with the Texans

Matt Spaeth - 260, 10 lbs lighter than his listed weight with the Steelers

J'Marcus Webb - 333, this is different from last year by a few lbs but I can't remember which way



Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 02, 2011, 04:56:20 pm
Please please please pass on Bryant McKinney....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 04:58:24 pm
Please please please pass on Bryant McKinney....

My thoughts exactly.  McKinnie supposedly weighed-in to Vikings camp at over 400 lbs.  I know he and Tice have history but hopefully that won't factor into this decision or it will be Orlando Pace 2.0 without question. 

He's a lazy tub with very questionable character whose best days are well behind him. Pass.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 05:11:33 pm
Assuming yahoo has older data - here are the old weights and (current weights):

Cutler, Jay  QB 6-3 233 (220)
Davis, Kellen  TE 6-7 262 (267)
Idonije, Israel  LDE 6-6 270 (275)
Louis, Lance  ROG 6-3 305  (320)
Melton, Henry  RDT 6-3 265 (295)
Spaeth, Matt  TE 6-7 270 (260)
Okoye, Amobi  LDE 6-2 292  (I had seen him listed at 315 - he's the new Tommie Harris - got the same #91)
Webb, J'Marcus  ROT 6-7 310 (333)


 
 


Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 05:12:07 pm
BOURBONNAIS, Ill. (AP)—The Chicago Bears and free agent tight end Desmond Clark(notes) have agree to a one-year contract.

Seldom used last season, Clark ranks ninth in team history with 242 catches, 20th in yards receiving with 2,639 and has 18 touchdown catches since joining the Bears in 2003.

He also played for Denver and Miami, and has 323 catches for 3,591 yards with 27 TDs in 12 seasons.

The Bears have made some changes at tight end, trading Greg Olsen(notes) to Carolina and signing Matt Spaeth(notes) from Pittsburgh.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 02, 2011, 05:23:41 pm
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=nfp-20110802_have_the_bears_made_the_right_moves_in_free_agency

Pretty good article on free agency.  Written by Greg Gabriel so he knows the Bears pretty well.  Last year he sounded like he had some sour grapes but he either got over it or has decided he just likes these moves.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 05:24:36 pm
Assuming yahoo has older data - here are the old weights and (current weights):

Cutler, Jay  QB 6-3 233 (220)
Davis, Kellen  TE 6-7 262 (267)
Idonije, Israel  LDE 6-6 270 (275)
Louis, Lance  ROG 6-3 305  (320)
Melton, Henry  RDT 6-3 265 (295)
Spaeth, Matt  TE 6-7 270 (260)
Okoye, Amobi  LDE 6-2 292  (I had seen him listed at 315 - he's the new Tommie Harris - got the same #91)
Webb, J'Marcus  ROT 6-7 310 (333)

Thanks, Dallas.  There was an article in the Trib a couple days ago about how the Bears were committed to getting bigger this season, and by and large it would appear that's what's happening.  The obvious exception of course being Cutler who struck me as a little puffy last year although that extra padding may have preserved his career with all the abuse he took.  220 OTOH is lean and mean and if that's a true weight it would seem to indicate a serious offseason conditioning effort by #6 which can only help him this year.

As for Carimi, I think he played in the 320s in college but his 316 roster weight is actually almost identical to the 314 he weighed at the combine.  Also, FWIW, at the combine his hands were measured at 10 3/8 inches.  Folks, those are some meathooks...  if you don't believe me get a ruler and see for yourself. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 05:27:02 pm
I don't put much stock in Greg Gabriel's evaluations.  His work with the Bears left much to be desired and we have a lot of wasted draft picks to show for it. 

Not to mention, if he were so good at it, he'd be doing it for an actual NFL team right now instead of just writing about it.

It's an interesting read, though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 05:39:09 pm
Frankly I'm surprised Dez Clark agreed to come back after the way Martz totally marginalized him last year.

OTOH there must not have been anyone else interested in his services... and with the economy the way it is, if you can pull down a few hundred grand for one more year that's not something you're wise to pass up.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 02, 2011, 05:39:48 pm
I was kind of suprised that Gabriel had such a favorable view of the Bears' moves.  As Pekin said, he wasn't shy about slamming the Bears' moves in the past.

As for the Eagles, they just signed Ronnie Brown.  It's like they're building a FFL of FAs over there in Philly.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 02, 2011, 05:42:07 pm
I was kind of suprised that Gabriel had such a favorable view of the Bears' moves.  As Pekin said, he wasn't shy about slamming the Bears' moves in the past.

What I got from the article -- and in fact he says as much at the front of the piece-- is that Gabriel appreciated the value the Bears got in F.A...  i.e., former 1st round draft picks and/or solid contributors for just a couple mil a year each...  more than being enthralled with the talent of the players per se.

So in that respect, he is still thinking exactly like a Bear front office guy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 02, 2011, 05:46:35 pm
He correctly pointed out the Bears are getting guys who fit their system on offense and defense.  These same players may not have been as good in systems they did not fit it.

http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post/_/id/4671032/bears-likely-to-bring-in-ol-help

Looks like the Bears are going to go with Webb at LT and Carimi at RT or vice versa if the current set up does n ot work out.  Everything else is up in the air and they are still looking for a vet guard.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 07:23:36 pm
So we might have an acquisition by the end of the week? Cant come soon enough. Maybe Martz has had a chat with Uncle Jerry. To me clearly the weak link on the line is Chris Williams. He needs to take up golfing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 02, 2011, 08:07:18 pm
Probably isn't one guy that is pushing this....more likely it's become a resounding,pounding,drum beat that is getting louder by the day 'WE NEED OFFENSIVE LINEMEN!'....and from the media,the fans,players,little ol' lady down the block....louder and louder....cannot be ignored any longer.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 02, 2011, 08:14:40 pm
I agree.  I got from Angello's interviews he was done.  But they are still beating the bushes.  Sadly there is not a lot out there because they sat on their thumbs so long.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 09:25:12 pm
From the Trib

*Speaking of the offensive line, both Chris Williams and rookie Gabe Carimi each had their struggles going against Henry Melton. Carimi saw Melton blow by him during 2-on-2 pass-protection drills, while Williams ended up on the ground against Melton in full-team drills. Carimi also got beaten badly by Israel Idonije numerous times.

It's early  :P
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 02, 2011, 09:45:48 pm
Source: Bears eye Lofa Tatupu (http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/6828697/source-mutual-interest-chicago-bears-lofa-tatupu)

There is a mutual interest between the Chicago Bears and free agent linebacker Lofa Tatupu, according to a league source.  Tatupu, who was released by the Seattle Seahawks over the weekend, has visited the Oakland Raiders and has a meeting planned with the Washington Redskins.  Tatupu has a strong Bears connection. Assistant general manager Tim Ruskell drafted Tatupu out of USC in 2005 when Ruskell was the general manager of the Seahawks. It's uncertain where Tatupu, who was a middle linebacker during his six-year career with the Seahawks, would potentially fit with the Bears, who have Brian Urlacher firmly entrenched in the position.  Tatupu met with coach Pete Carroll on Saturday night and asked for his release after the Seahawks asked him to take a pay cut, ESPN sources said. Tatupu was then cut by Seattle on Sunday morning.  Tatupu, 28, is a three-time Pro Bowler and played a major role in taking the Seahawks to their only Super Bowl appearance during his rookie season in 2005.  But he struggled with injuries the past few seasons and has seen a decline in production. He missed most of 2009 after tearing a pectoral muscle. Last season he played in all 16 games, but his 88 tackles were the lowest of his career in a full season, and he needed surgery on both knees in the offseason. Tatupu's prime was his first few seasons when he recorded more than 100 tackles and went to the Pro Bowl each year between 2005-07.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 02, 2011, 10:01:51 pm
We need a starting strong side linebacker
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 03, 2011, 12:25:59 am
I think we're fine with Nick Roach at SLB and I bet Tatupu is looking for a starting MLB job right now.

Assuming Pisa doesn't return and I'm pretty sure Rod Wilson is gone we'll need a couple backups.  Brian Iwuh returns and rookie JT Smith will be given the best shot at the 5th LB spot. 

So it looks like all we need to find is a backup MLB/SLB type - we have quite a few FA possibilities:

62    Antle, Tanner            LB     6'3"    232    //                 0    Tulsa
64    Baptiste, Tressor    LB    6'0"    232    //                    0    Texas A&M - Kingsville
58    DeCicco, Dom            LB    6'3"    230    9/11/1988    0    Pittsburgh
59    Johnson, Chris    LB    6'2"    230    12/10/1986    1    South Dakota State
60    Minor, Deron            LB    6'0"    230    8/11/1988    0    McNeese State
96    Trahan, Patrick    LB    6'2"    234    11/7/1986    1    Mississippi

If none of these guys work out there should be a few guys available after the final cuts.  One requirement will be that they will have to be able to play STs.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 03, 2011, 06:47:48 am
The Pittsburg kid loks the best of the lot. The rest of the lot look like ST projects. I am not sold on Roach either for a starter
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 08:00:46 am
http://www.chicagotribune.com/site/newspaper/sports/ct-spt-0803-bears-side--20110803,0,3561864.story

Story about our WRs bulking up in the offseason.

This is good news. Our WRs got abused by bigger, stronger DBs last year and it looks like they took it to heart.  Combine that with a previous article about the Bears wanting to get bigger overall (and some success toward that goal based on roster comparisons from this year to last), and it would at least appear that some lessons were learned from last year's matchups with bigger, better conditioned teams like the Giants, Jets, Patriots and Packers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 08:02:28 am
The Pittsburg kid loks the best of the lot. The rest of the lot look like ST projects. I am not sold on Roach either for a starter

Not sure how much Tatupu has left in the tank. Plus didn't we spend on a draft pick on a LB for that purpose?

That being said, for the right price Tatupu might be a decent 1-year bridge at SLB similar to Tinoisamoa, until the rookie can develop a bit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 03, 2011, 08:29:00 am
Doesnt the SSLB have cover responsibilities? I dont believe MLBs are adept at covering TEs and backs, which doesnt make me much interested in Tatupu. And yes we did draft a LB late in the draft. If I recall his name is Wilson and he was from West Virginia.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 03, 2011, 09:11:04 am

Tatupu would provide great insurance for Urlacher but can he play outside?

My bad, the rookie's name is JT Thomas (not JT Smith). 

SLB is probably one of the least important positions on the Bears' defense - he gets subbed out in passing situations by DJ Moore.  Smith was talking up the performance of JT Thomas the other day.

If Iwuh and JT Thomas look like they can cover all 3 LB spots - I'd go with a younger LB.  Plus, I don't have a list, but I'd bet there are quite a few OLBs getting released around the league with all the teams converting to 3-4s.  Didn't the Packers release Chillar and Poppinga?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 09:28:02 am
Agreed with Dallas...  Tatupu is a good... borderline great player... when healthy.

The question is, is the position he plays a position of dire enough need that it warrants not only the salary, but a roster spot that may otherwise go to a promising younger player?  Also, virtually by defintion, all backup LBs on the Bears play special teams...  not sure Tatupu would be too excited about pulling that duty.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 03, 2011, 09:37:43 am
Right. As I said I dont believe Tatupu plays outside and with health concerns I wouldnt bank on any cover skills. I would rather see them go with a younger player who has the speed to cover ST.

Thomas is the kid from WV. Its Thomas, not Wilson. I look for him to stick.

What they need is more OLmen not middle linebackers
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 09:51:31 am
What they need is more OLmen not middle linebackers

Yup. Early reports out of training camp regarding our O-Linemen are NOT good.  Backups like Melton and Wootton are schooling them on a daily basis. Even Carimi is struggling.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 03, 2011, 10:28:50 am
The Oline always takes longer to gel in training camp.  Not worried after just a few days.  Now after the third regular season game, it might be another story.  ;) 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 10:42:31 am
The Oline always takes longer to gel in training camp.  Not worried after just a few days.  Now after the third regular season game, it might be another story.  ;)

I would buy that, except for the fact that our O-Linemen are getting schooled in 2-on-2 drills.  In other words it has nothing to do with 5 guys gelling, it's our O-Linemen getting whipped mano a mano by our D-Linemen...  who in their own right are decent but nowhere near the caliber of the Packers and Lions DLs we'll come against. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 03, 2011, 10:49:44 am
Yup. Early reports out of training camp regarding our O-Linemen are NOT good.  Backups like Melton and Wootton are schooling them on a daily basis. Even Carimi is struggling.

I haven't heard anything bad yet about Webb - and that's the guy I'm most concerned with right now.  Carimi hasn't hit anybody since his last bowl game - and those were college players.  Not too worried about him...yet.  He's got the size and strength...we'll find out if he's quick on his feet. 

Until I see Paea and Okoye, I consider Melton our best pass rushing DT right now.  But if he's beating any of our guards on a daily basis, there's a problem.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 03, 2011, 10:57:54 am
Yup. Early reports out of training camp regarding our O-Linemen are NOT good.  Backups like Melton and Wootton are schooling them on a daily basis. Even Carimi is struggling.

And thats a pity when backup DE and DTs beat your starting Olinemen
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 11:05:52 am
One thing about Melton is, he looked pretty darn good last year at a ridiculously light weight (listed at 265).

This year he's listed at 295... same as Tommie Harris played at.  If Melton kept the quickness and explosiveness we saw last year, and added 30 lbs of strength and bulk in the offseason, it doesn't surprise me that he's looking good in the early going -- especially against our OL, but even that notwithstanding maybe he is poised for a breakout season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 03, 2011, 11:14:40 am

I don't think he played at 265...that's about the size of Alex Brown and Melton looked stockier.  I haven't seen him this year but if he's really at 295 he should be fine.  Can't wait to see our all our active DTs this year:  Paea, Okoye, Melton and Toeaina too.   

We need  a better pass rush - Peppers and Idonijie need help.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 03, 2011, 11:38:31 am
We need  a better pass rush - Peppers and Idonijie need help.

I think we can all agree on that. A better pass rush makes your corners and safetys that much better, especially against a guy like Rogers. The less time he has to pick apart your defense the better off we are whether we sack him or not.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 03, 2011, 11:45:43 am
Weight is important when playing the DL.  But don't underestimate sheer talent.

Is anyone old enough to remember Allen Paige.  He played the bulk of his career at 295, one of the heaviest lineman of his day.  Then he came to the Bears towards the end of his career, and lost so much weight that he got down to 225.  He played for the Bears at defensive tackle, and actually did a decent job.  Not as good as when he was younger and weighed 295, but much better than you would have dreamed that a player at that weight could play.

All I am saying is that if Melton can play decently at 265, he is likely to play even better at 295, even though he is bound to lose a little agility and speed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 12:02:09 pm
We need  a better pass rush - Peppers and Idonijie need help.

I think we can all agree on that. A better pass rush makes your corners and safetys that much better, especially against a guy like Rogers. The less time he has to pick apart your defense the better off we are whether we sack him or not.

And clearly, that's what Lovie and Marinelli are counting on, seeing that we have really done nothing to upgrade our D-Backfield talent and arguably have even dropped off a bit with a green and injury prone Major Wright replacing Manning at S. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 12:20:29 pm
Story from today's Trib about the TE situation.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-olsens-exit-opens-door-for-bears-te-davis-20110803,0,4189089.story

Nothing in here that will make the Greg Olsen fans feel much better...  but it does give some insights into Martz' thinking and he is clearly very high on Kellen Davis.

Also interesting... no mention of Dez Clark even though he was signed yesterday.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 03, 2011, 12:44:53 pm
Alan Page gave the Bears a few really good years.  From what I remember Page wanted to lose a bunch of weight and the Vikings were totally against it and let him go.  He had to be the skinniest DT ever but he got the job done - especially as a pass rusher.  I'm not sure he ever got up to 295 (that's pretty heavy for any player in the late 70s) but I do recall him be in that 225 range.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 03, 2011, 12:51:43 pm

Martz said:
“So, you get a tight end that’s 270 pounds with a big old wingspan … now what that does, you don’t have to double team the edge to get outside. It allows you a freedom in the running game that you would normally not have. Instead of running away from him, you can run at him and expect him to win without getting help from the tackle. So it just really allows you to be a lot more multiple in your runs and creative with the running back.”

But you had a 300lb TE that played almost every down last year...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 12:52:04 pm
I'm not sure he ever got up to 295 (that's pretty heavy for any player in the late 70s) but I do recall him be in that 225 range.

I was thinking the same thing.  I can still remember the first time I saw a guy listed at 300 lbs on an NFL roster...  it was some no-name OT for the San Diego Chargers and that was a long time ago, probably 1979 or 1980.  Anything over 290 was practically unheard of at that time, even among the biggest linemen in the league.

Or to put another perspective on it, consider the dimensions of 2 of our TEs... Kellen Davis is 6'7, 267 and Matt Spaeth is 6'7, 260... and realize that's the same height and within a few pounds of one of our SuperBowl XX starting OTs (Keith Van Horne), and BIGGER than than the other OT (Jimbo Covert). 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 12:53:31 pm
So it just really allows you to be a lot more multiple in your runs

What the eff does this mean?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 03, 2011, 01:31:24 pm
I think it means that it disguises what a play looks like to the defense.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 03, 2011, 01:37:18 pm
At the time, Paige was the heaviest player in the NFL.  I have a football card that listed him at 287, but also remember his getting up to 295 one year.  Monday night announcers were amazed that someone could be so agile at that weight.

But the point was that he was good when he was heavy, and he was still good when he was light.  Weight is not the only standard to use.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 02:09:28 pm
295 to 225 is a ridiculous weight swing. To think that a player could be effective at both of those weights -- at the same position, no less --  is a strong testimonial indeed to some exceptional athleticism.

I thought Izzy was doing something special going from 295 down to 265 but, 70 lbs?!  Wow.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 03, 2011, 02:48:45 pm
I don't think the weight loss was all in one year.  We are comparing his top playing weight to his lowest playing weight, and there may have been several years of reductions before Minnesota decided to get rid of him.

But yes, it does show that athleticism is not totally dependent upon weight.  To get back to the original point, if Melton was fast an agile at 265, he might still be fast an agile at 295, although probably not QUITE as fast and agile.  Time will tell.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 03, 2011, 02:59:03 pm
Hey!  Nice new house you guys have here!  Love what you've done to the place.

 Welcome home AG!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 03, 2011, 03:15:41 pm
Tommie Harris signed with the Colts (yawn).  Any news of the Bears getting some people for the "other" line? Maybe not calling the offensive line we can trick the Jer into getting somebody. The Jer isn't the coldest icecube in the tray don't ya know. All the other gms in the league do. Combined with his west coast "little buddy" I'm sure the Bears are in for some stellar years. Simply boffo.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 03, 2011, 04:47:00 pm
Tommie Harris signed with the Colts (yawn).  Any news of the Bears getting some people for the "other" line? Maybe not calling the offensive line we can trick the Jer into getting somebody. The Jer isn't the coldest icecube in the tray don't ya know. All the other gms in the league do. Combined with his west coast "little buddy" I'm sure the Bears are in for some stellar years. Simply boffo.

 LOL! I'd like to hope our guys have a decent track into F.A. and other things.

 THE MYSTERY OFFENSIVE LINE is going to be good for **** and giggles !

 How we came out of the BYE WEEK last year ... we got our asses handed to us before that.

 Came back from the bye and WON 5 straight ... thats the thing about Tice ...

 he's got the fuuuuckin horsepower to get things done.

 I was big on Herman Johnson and Kreutz ... but they are gone. Tice must have seen somthing negative.

 This is going to be a short camp and Tice may have to make snap judgements.

 Nobody likes that but this may be the way things play out.

 Besides we can always rehire who we let go.

 I'm wondering if Big Herman came into camp like the OL that Minnie cut ...

 a blob that needs to be made into shape.  :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 05:08:25 pm
Yeah, Big Herman Johnson...

Two chances on teams with bottom-5 OLs...  and couldn't make it off the practice squad of either one.

Something's not right with the kid.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 03, 2011, 05:32:49 pm
Yeah, Big Herman Johnson...

Two chances on teams with bottom-5 OLs...  and couldn't make it off the practice squad of either one.

Something's not right with the kid.

 What will always get to me is Tice signed him and saw somthing in him.

 And may be there in the future.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 03, 2011, 05:48:58 pm
What will always get to me is Tice signed him and saw somthing in him.

 And may be there in the future.

Yeah you never know.  Maybe Big Herm was weighing 4 bills and Tice told him, "look we've got to let you go cause you're in no shape to practice... but if you can get down to X pounds by X date we'll see what we can do."  The last thing the Bears want is some big guy dying on them from the heat like what happened with Korey Stringer so if Herm was badly out of shape they may have not wanted to take the chance.  But who knows if they may not have left the door open at least a crack. I guess as long as no other team takes him there's a chance he could be back.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 03, 2011, 07:07:17 pm
Ha ha. I doubt they even left it open a crack.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 03, 2011, 07:34:15 pm

 With this abbreviated training camp we cut the wheat from the chaff day one.

 Now its going to be interesting who is cut and who comes back.

 At this point in time ... we dont know what the hell is going on.

 I dont like what I'm hearing about carimi and melton ...

 but thats just the opening of training camp.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 03, 2011, 10:50:42 pm
Yeah you never know.  Maybe Big Herm was weighing 4 bills and Tice told him, "look we've got to let you go cause you're in no shape to practice... but if you can get down to X pounds by X date we'll see what we can do."  The last thing the Bears want is some big guy dying on them from the heat like what happened with Korey Stringer so if Herm was badly out of shape they may have not wanted to take the chance.  But who knows if they may not have left the door open at least a crack. I guess as long as no other team takes him there's a chance he could be back.

I felt the same way about Aromashodu and then Olsen.  Herman's gone now.   My advice...just let it go.

Herman Johnson...we hardly knew ye.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 03, 2011, 10:54:12 pm

Now if Melton can only play as good as he looks and as good as everybody says he can be.  Double digit sacks?  Now that would be something.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0804-bears-melton--20110804,0,1405997.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wizard61 on August 03, 2011, 11:15:11 pm
The 6'4", 278-pound Page gradually pared down his weight to 225 through a rigorous running routine. Vikings coach Bud Grant, however, believed Page's weight loss hurt his performance.

Grant placed him on waivers after the sixth game of the 1978 season. The Bears contacted him within hours of his release. Although he joined Chicago in midseason, he led all Bear defenders with 11-and-a-half sacks.

He played three more seasons with the Bears before calling it quits in 1981. In 1988, the Canton native returned home for induction into the Hall of Fame.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 03, 2011, 11:27:25 pm
I felt the same way about Aromashodu and then Olsen.  Herman's gone now.   My advice...just let it go.

Herman Johnson...we hardly knew ye.

 Tice and nobody else signed Herman ... if he showed up out of shape this could be a wake up call to get into shape on his own dime.

 Either you want to play or you dont.

 This whole offense under Martz is getting a change over. I dont know whats where.

 One thing to be discussed is TE. Martz signed and cut Manu ... so hes pretty quick on the trigger like ...

 that coach at N.E.  Belushi or whatever.

 Kellen Davis had to be the upside that Martz saw or Olsen wouldnt be gone.

 Desmond Clark must fit the scheme as an all time blocker and somtime receiver.

 Which brings us to Roy Williams ... best times ever with Martz at Deeeeeeeeetroit.

 Can Roy block? That has to factor in. If you look at Williams he's designed more as a TE then WR.

 Has Martz found the key ingrediant that Olsen lacked?

 We seem to have found some bull nose north south Fullbacks ...

 which should make room for when Forte isnt on the goal line.

 You wouldnt sign Barber if Taylor is going to be around.

 Okoye backs up Paea or the other way around. Who gets hurt first.

 As usual we go out of our way to sign every DEFENSE player on the planet.

 The issue being addressed in a round about way is OL ...

 we like to hope that Jerry has a trick up his sleeve.

 But if youve been a fan of this team for more then a few years ...

 you know thats the last thing on anybodys mind at Halas Hall other then a token effort.

 If this team built an OL the way it goes out of its gourd to build a DL ... who could stop us?

 I think the word is called BALANCE ... this much here ... and equally that much there.

 BUT ... we went to the NFC PLAYOFFS last season ... with junk as an OL .... and it showed.

 You would like to think ... that this has to be ... in any way shape or form ... better.

 With what we have now ... we shall see.
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 04, 2011, 06:29:11 am
That was something when the Bears signed Page.  I thought he was as low as 218, I don't know why that is in my head, but it is in there...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 04, 2011, 06:45:28 am
Thats a glowing article on Melton. So he went from 255 to 275 and now to 295. No wonder why he blew by Carimi. Being strong and quick sure helps. He just might make the starting lineup. We need somebody to blow up offenses and get to the QB. Looks like he has the speed and quickness that Tommy Harris had when he was a rookie.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 04, 2011, 07:35:17 am
Crash course on life in NFL has Bears' Enderle ready to crash

By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
10:31 p.m. CDT, August 3, 2011

BOURBONNAIS — Nathan Enderle was so wiped out after practice Monday night that he told his Twitter followers he has "never wanted to sleep in a dorm room bed so badly."

The Bears rookie quarterback, a fifth-round draft pick from Idaho, is taking a crash course in Mike Martz's offense, trying to pick up where Dan LeFevour didn't do so well a year ago. The Bears want to develop young passers in the system, and when LeFevour was let go at final cuts, it signaled a breakdown in the system.

With Enderle, the Bears have a 6-foot-4, 240-pound quarterback who is more the prototype you think of in a Martz offense. But like all the other rookies, he's way behind by virtue of the NFL lockout.

Enderle got together with fullback Eddie Williams, a college teammate, a couple of times in the summer to learn a little about the offense. He showed up once to throw with wide receivers and starter Jay Cutler.

"But there was really nothing to prepare you for this," he said. "I think it's going well. The coaching staff has been helping out, the players have been helping out. They push you to learn it as quickly as possible. It's been hectic, but I have been enjoying it.

"It's an all-day thing and it's my job now. You get tired. I was ready to go to bed (Monday night)."

Enderle doesn't have any far-reaching goals in mind. He just wants to learn the system as quickly as he can.

"If I learn all I can and I execute that, I'll be fine," he said.

Reason for return: Special teams ace Corey Graham hoped to find a team in free agency that would allow him to compete for a starting job on defense. Former Bears defensive backs coach Steve Wilks, now with the Chargers, called him minutes into the start of free agency. Other teams expressed interest. But the compressed schedule created by the lockout made him think twice about making a switch right now, a primary factor that led to him returning with a one-year contract that will put him back on the free-agent market in March when he's only 26.

"To be truthful, I didn't think I was coming back," Graham said. "The lockout definitely changed things. Things were rushed. It wasn't the same as normal free agency. To be a free agent in March, you have a long time to learn the system. The way it was, I was going to have to sit out until (Thursday), and you're basically going in during the middle of training camp and you pretty much can't learn a defense in two weeks and have an opportunity to play. I figured this would be the best situation. I didn't want to try something drastic at the last minute."

Extra points: The Bears are expected to practice in full pads at 7 p.m. Thursday. … Tight end Draylen Ross was waived after veteran Desmond Clark returned. … Don't expect the Bears to be involved for linebacker Lofa Tatupu in free agency unless he strikes out on a richer contract elsewhere. … Running back Harvey Unga was excused from camp earlier this week because his wife is giving birth to a child.

bmbiggs@tribune.com

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 04, 2011, 07:39:36 am
I didnt realize that Enderle was such a big boy. He is bigger than Cuttler. Wow!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 04, 2011, 07:43:45 am
I take it that as long as he doesn't Todd Collins some passes all over the field or Jonathan Quinns himself in his pants this preseason that he's all but the number 3.  No more of this practice squad "oh gosh darn we lost another one" strategery.

OTOH, a lot of scouting reports I've read or heard designate him as another WTF pick.  So it will be interesting to see what he does in games.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 04, 2011, 08:28:00 am
Enderle is definitely a W-T-F pick in my book.  Especially if this is Martz' last season here which is a strong possibility and a virtual lock if the offense fails again this year.  He's got size but beyond that I don't see him bringing much to the table long term.

Re Melton vs. Carimi...  I'm really hoping that's more a result of Melton being ready for a breakout season as opposed to Carimi being less than advertised.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 04, 2011, 09:04:39 am
Tonight...  in pads, with everyone participating for the first time...  is the first practice of the preseason that really counts.

I'm interested to hear what happens.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 04, 2011, 09:56:18 am
Thats a glowing article on Melton. So he went from 255 to 275 and now to 295. No wonder why he blew by Carimi. Being strong and quick sure helps. He just might make the starting lineup. We need somebody to blow up offenses and get to the QB. Looks like he has the speed and quickness that Tommy Harris had when he was a rookie.

This is Melton's 3rd year, but he was stashed on IR his rookie year.  So he's only had one year in the NFL AND more importantly only one year at DT.  In college he ended up playing DE after coming in as a running back. 

Melton still has to prove he can be effective at 295 but even if he loses a bit of speed he'll still be one of the fastest DTs in football.  And he's only been a part time player but then again with the depth we have at DT he won't be asked to play every down. 

Even if he doesn't start that means Paea or Okoye beat him out...and that might not be such a bad thing.

Here's what I'd like to see on 3rd and long:

DE Peppers  DE Gholston  DT Idonjie  DT Melton

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 04, 2011, 09:59:32 am
Enderle is definitely a W-T-F pick in my book.  Especially if this is Martz' last season here which is a strong possibility and a virtual lock if the offense fails again this year.  He's got size but beyond that I don't see him bringing much to the table long term.

Re Melton vs. Carimi...  I'm really hoping that's more a result of Melton being ready for a breakout season as opposed to Carimi being less than advertised.

Any QB taken in the late rounds is a WTF pick.  One of Enderlie's 'issues' as I recall was his foot speed and as for as big as he is doesn't really have a cannon.  I'm thinking Orton?

This is the first week of camp, right.  I'd reserve judgement on Carimi until we see him in the first PS game.  I don't trust the writers and I trust comments from the Bears' coaches even less.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 04, 2011, 05:46:39 pm
Rex Ryan revisits Vernon Gholston failure (http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/39162/rex-ryan-revisits-vernon-gholston-failure) (4/8/2011)

When Rex Ryan took over as New York Jets head coach, his general attitude toward pass-rusher Vernon Gholston was bullish.  Ryan thought if he couldn't develop Gholston, then nobody could.  After three NFL seasons and two under Ryan, the Jets released Gholston in March. The sixth overall draft choice in 2008 never got it. He started five games, was a healthy scratch three times and recorded zero.  At the NFL owners meeting in New Orleans a couple weeks ago, I had a chance to speak to Ryan for the first time since the Jets cut Gholston.  Ryan was little defensive about not being able to mold Gholston into an effective player.  Ryan claimed circumstances got in the way. Gholston went from 4-3 defensive end at Ohio State to 3-4 outside linebacker with the Jets under previous head coach Eric Mangini to 3-4 defensive end last year under Ryan.  The Jets also added Trevor Pryce during the season, an acquisition Ryan said hurt Gholston's snap count.
 
"I think Vernon improved," Ryan said. "Last year, I thought he gained strides. Unfortunately, I never knew this when we picked up Trevor and he played well for us, but that took a little away from Vernon. We had Shaun Ellis, so it was kind of hard to get [Gholston] more reps.  But the guy is an excellent teammate. He did what was asked and he got better."

Even so, the Jets dumped him. Ryan spent a lot of time talking up Gholston to reporters and expressing optimism he would become a productive defender. Given that, I asked Ryan if he failed when it came to Gholston.

"Well, then I failed as far as the numbers go," Ryan said. "But I thought he got better, though. We'll see what happens to him. He's not done playing.  I think I've had a long list of guys I've developed in my coaching career. Some guys develop faster than others. But I'll put how I coach up against anybody in this league when it comes to defense and technique."

(http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2011/0301/nfl_u_gholston_ps_200.jpg)

Those pipes remind me of ol' Alonzo.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 04, 2011, 10:24:31 pm
Alonzo "I've got one move-the Bullrush" Spellman....ahh yess,remember him well.....not pleasantly so....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 04, 2011, 10:35:10 pm
Actually I always remembered him going outside and being pushed waaaayy out of the play every time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 04, 2011, 11:19:55 pm
He was versatile - he had 2 moves.

When he took his meds he was a very good DT with the Cowboys.

He and John Thierry were huge first round DE disappointments - can't blame Angelo for those picks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 05, 2011, 06:21:01 am
He was versatile - he had 2 moves.

When he took his meds he was a very good DT with the Cowboys.

He and John Thierry were huge first round DE disappointments - can't blame Angelo for those picks.

Bush?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 05, 2011, 07:57:31 am

Aug. 4 practice observatiions

By Mark Potash on August 4, 2011 10:16 PM

A beautiful night for football attracted a nice crowd that included Rev. Jesse Jackson -- standing behind the fence with the rest of the fans --  at Bears training came at Olivet Nazarene University on Thursday.

With the NFL players ratifying the new 10-year collective bargaining agreement, the 2011 NFL season officially began, and free agents signed since the lockout ended were finally able to participate in practice.

The crowd seemed to be looking for Roy Williams to put on a show. But the first pass to him in the 7-on-7 drill, from Jay Cutler, was broken up by Tim Jennings. Cutler seemed to miss Williams again -- a pass so far off the mark it might have been intended for Earl Bennett. But Cutler and Williams finally connected on a short buttonhook route in the flat against Jennings.

In the ''team'' drill, Caleb Hanie tried to hit Williams downfield, but Charles Tillman broke it up. Williams seems to be drawing everybody's attention even in training camp drills. Must be a player.

Williams seemed to be getting more reps than Johnny Knox, but probably because the Bears are as anxious as everybody else to try to develop a passing combo Bears fans have only been able to dream about since Cade McNown-to-Marcus Robinson in 1999. Or maybe Ed Brown-to-Harlon Hill in the mid-1950s is more like it.

For what it's worth, Dane Sanzenbacher also seemed to be taking reps from Knox the last time the Bears practiced in pads at night on Monday. Sanzenbacher, by the way, still got his share of reps with the first unit. He had a bad drop on a pass from Cutler over the middle in the team drill. But Hanie went right to him on the next play and the rookie from Ohio State made the play. The kid's going to get every chance to make it.

Hanie, the No. 2 quarterback, was rusty looked pretty good for not having played since the NFC Championship game. His first pass, in the 7-on-7 drill, was a perfectly threaded ball down the seam to tight end Desmond Clark.

Roberto Garza looks like he's getting the hang of it playing center. His battle with newcomer Chris Spencer might be interesting to watch -- especially if Lance Louis continues to look improved at right guard.

Matt Forte continues to look strong running the ball -- or as strong as a running back can look running against his teammates in training camp.

Sam Hurd is ticketed for special teams, but he made a couple of nice catches in tight spots, including one reaching grab along the sideline against Zack Bowman in 7-on-7.

Cutler completed his first six passes in the ''team'' drill, including one on a nifty catch by Knox along the right sideline. But on the next play, Cutler was intercepted by Craig Steltz on a ball that was deflected by Hurd.

Marion Barber looked fresh and strong and seemed to set the tone in the 9-on-7 running drill. When he carried the ball, you could hear his pads thumping. But he fumbled on one carry, with Bowman recovering.

Rookie wide receiver Kris Adams beat Joshua Moore down the left sideline for what probably would have been a 46-yard touchdown pass from Hanie in real life. Adams beat Bowman for another completion on the next play.

But the highlight of the night was a thread-the-needle pass over the middle from Cutler to Devin Hester between Jennings and Major Wright for a 40-yard gain if not a touchdown. Only 38 more days until the Bears face the Falcons on Sept. 11 at Soldier Field.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 05, 2011, 07:59:28 am
Practice report: New arrival Barber sets tone

By Michael C. Wright
 
BOURBONNAIS, Ill. -- Ratification of the new collective bargaining agreement allowed Chicago’s group of unrestricted free agent acquisitions to finally join their teammates Thursday night on the practice fields at Olivet Nazarene University.
 
Here’s a look at how the new additions performed during the session.:

Roy Williams: Williams worked with the first team through the majority of practice alongside Devin Hester. Williams ran crisp routes, displayed soft hands, and appeared to be faster than most expected. Williams slipped a couple of times early in practice. But in one-on-one drills Williams caught a slant route over Charles Tillman in one of the more physical matchups of the drill.

Williams also dropped a pass in 7-on-7 drills, but appeared to play better as the workout progressed.
 
Toward the end of practice, Williams tweaked a calf muscle, but it didn’t appear to be serious.
 
“I’m just getting old,” Williams joked.
 
Interestingly, though, Williams and Johnny Knox play the same position. Williams took the majority of the first-team reps throughout the practice, while Knox spent some time with the second group. Bears coach Lovie Smith said not to read too much into different lineups on the field at training camp, but the Williams-Knox situation is worth keeping an eye on.

Marion Barber: A fresh-legged Barber lived up to the “Marion the Barbarian” moniker during 9-on-7 drills, and even Smith said the running back “set the tone” with his physical play. During individual running back plays, Barber drew loud crowd reaction by a display of brute strength when he nearly toppled over a blocking sled during a step-and-punch drill.

Barber followed that by arguably the most exciting play of practice. On an off-tackle handoff, Barber barreled into a crowd, broke out, and clubbed Winston Venable out of the way before spinning the ball on the ground at the end of the run. The run prompted cheers from the crowd, as safety Chris Harris jokingly crawled on his knee towards Marion after the run. Smith, meanwhile, giddily ran back toward the huddle laughing at the end of the play.
 It wasn’t all positive for Barber, however. Darting through the secondary on a run up the middle, Barber had the ball poked loose by a safety with the defense recovering.

Sam Hurd: Made a couple of acrobatic catches during the individual period, but also did pushups on occasion after dropping a couple of passes. Hurd received some reps with the starters during 7 on 7 and team drills. Lined up against Tim Jennings during 1 on 1s, Hurd watched a couple of balls thrown fairly high sail through his hands. During team drills, another high pass slipped through his hands with Craig Steltz coming up with the interception. Like Williams, Hurd seemed to improve as the practice progressed.
 
Chris Spencer: Received most of his action during the early 9-on-7 period, and displayed the athleticism he’s been touted for. Spencer’s propensity for nastiness had been scrutinized prior to his arrival, but the center looked tenacious on a few running plays during inside drills. Offensive-line coach Mike Tice said the plan was to gradually ease in Spencer, who spent Thursday night working with the second team.

Vernon Gholston: Gholston’s first night drew praise from Smith, who raved about the defensive end’s quickness. Gholston chased down Kahlil Bell on an outside run during 9-on-7 drills, and stopped the running back for a loss. But Barber ruined Gholston’s good play by smashing into the defensive end and knocking him back, before the running back broke through a pile of would-be tacklers. During one-on-ones between the offensive and defensive linemen, Gholston seemed to get the best of tackle Frank Omiyale throughout the drill.

Amobi Okoye: No surprises from Okoye, who similar to Gholston, put his quickness on display while working with both the starters and second team. Bears guard/center Roberto Garza struggled some plays to contain Okoye, who constantly seemed to get decent penetration during individual matchups between the offensive and defensive lines.

Matt Spaeth: Spaeth caught a pass later in practice during team drills, but obviously, that’s not why the Bears signed him. The team acquired him to block, and that’s exactly what he did on a running play during team drills. The tight end pancaked rookie Chris Conte, knocking the safety flat on his back.

Adam Podlesh: The new punter actually spent time covering kickoffs on the scout team as the Bears worked on their kickoff returns. The team didn’t spend time punting, so Podlesh didn’t get a chance to showcase his punting leg.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 05, 2011, 08:09:01 am
Williams seemed to be getting more reps than Johnny Knox, but probably because the Bears are as anxious as everybody else to try to develop a passing combo Bears fans have only been able to dream about since Cade McNown-to-Marcus Robinson in 1999. Or maybe Ed Brown-to-Harlon Hill in the mid-1950s is more like it.

IIRC, Miller was able to take advantage of MRobs skills more than McVerb.  I can live with a Miller to Booker type connection with Cut and Roy.  If they click like that, then I think Knox and Bennett and even on occasion Hester can take advantage and open up the offense even more...as long as they can block of course.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 05, 2011, 09:16:45 am
It will be interesting to see how long they let Garza play C.  Garza is getting some work there and Lance Louis is benefiting from working with the first team at RG.

But at some point Spencer needs to go to C and Garza back to RG.  Not so much that either needs the reps at their familiar positions but they guys next to them need to build familiarity.

And if Louis is so good of a guard move him to the left side and see what he can do against Chris Williams.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 05, 2011, 10:07:22 am
It sounds like the athleticism of our DL has really been putting our OL to the test.

That's not a bad thing. I really believe one of the reasons our OL looked bad there for a couple years (besides lack of talent) is that they weren't going up against very talented guys in practice.  That appears to have changed now.

Re Williams v. Knox, if Williams supplants Knox as a WR I'm totally fine with that cause we're gonna need a good KR with Danieal Manning gone.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 05, 2011, 10:25:36 am

Re Williams v. Knox, if Williams supplants Knox as a WR I'm totally fine with that cause we're gonna need a good KR with Danieal Manning gone.

I'm not.  Knox needs to be on the field WITH Roy Williams.  Someone needs to learn the flanker spot.  And Bennett needs to be the 3rd receiver.  Bring in Hester to give a break to the other 3 and to play in 4 WR sets and return kicks and punts.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 05, 2011, 11:16:27 am
I've always seen Bennett as the prototypical flanker.  Despite having neither exceptional size nor speed, he is by far our most "natural", polished and dependable WR -- and I include Roy Williams in that group -- and the closest to Isaac Bruce / Torry Holt combo that Martz had in his glory days with the Rams.  As such I feel Bennett's talents would be wasted as the #3.

That being said, in Martz' scheme there is certainly room for 3 or even 4 WRs to be on the field a good amount of the time so I don't think Knox is gonna be totally left out in the cold as a WR.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 05, 2011, 11:39:22 am
I agree with your assessment on Bennett but the Bears offense desparately needs the speed factor in the lineup and that mean Knox plays most of the snaps as well as Roy Williams.   With Olsen out of the lineup defenses would not feel threatened deep having to cover an offense with Spaeth/Davis and Bennett.  Safeties creep up - running game gets stymied.

Flanker,split-end, wide receiver, X, Y, Z...whatever you call them Martz needs to make adjustments to accommodate his talent.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 05, 2011, 12:18:10 pm
What's going on with that Unga kid anyway?

Tribute says he's missing the third straight practice cause his wife's having a baby.

I mean, I'm all for family but jeez, he missed all of last year on IR and still no time on the practice field this year.  Chester Taylor back in camp and Marion Barber looking really good when at we'll be rostering, at most, 3 RBs. 

Starting to wonder if Unga is just one of those guys that wasn't meant to be.  I know he only cost a 7th round draft pick but he hasn't shown anybody a thing and time is getting short.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 05, 2011, 12:45:36 pm
PFT reporting that Olin Kreutz has signed a 1-year deal with the Saints.

And all I can say to that is, it must be nice to have the luxury of carrying a backup C on your roster who can't play any other position. If they are counting on him being their starter they're in for a hurtin' although their OGs are good enough they just may be able to pull it off.

I'm guessing O's role with the Saints will essentially be that of a player-coach and that his actual time on the field will be minimal.

I'm also guessing he signed for considerably less than the $4 mil we had put on the table.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 05, 2011, 12:48:17 pm
I'm not.  Knox needs to be on the field WITH Roy Williams.  Someone needs to learn the flanker spot.  And Bennett needs to be the 3rd receiver.  Bring in Hester to give a break to the other 3 and to play in 4 WR sets and return kicks and punts.

Man I TOTALLY agree with you on this.  Don't know why yapper hates Knox so much.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 05, 2011, 02:15:22 pm
In the end, he turned down more money from two other teams, including the Bears, to join the Saints. As the 34-year-old said, it wasn't about the money. The difference in base salaries can be mitigated too if Kreutz triggers bonuses in the deal.

Kreutz will replace veteran Jonathan Goodwin, who departed to the San Francisco 49ers in free agency. The Bears offered Kreutz $4 million to play this season, but the ultimatum he received from Angelo soured negotiations and he left.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 05, 2011, 02:59:55 pm
I heard Kreutz signed for $2 mil, plus incentives.  Which I'm sure is still far less than we had offered.

Olin never was the brightest bulb on the tree.

I've got no ill will toward the guy but I hope our young DTs just abuse his azz to no end when we play the Saints.  And I hope the Saints call a LOT of shotgun plays that game...    ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 05, 2011, 03:30:52 pm
The Saints do play a lot of shotgun.  I guess they did not realize his weakness with that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 05, 2011, 03:33:31 pm
(http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/282538_10150272840294452_115897014451_7226187_5768233_n.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 05, 2011, 03:35:26 pm
(http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/251476_10150272840224452_115897014451_7226183_526438_n.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 05, 2011, 04:13:22 pm
Cool pics.

Looks like Carimi's got quite a tan going.  I thought it was the Fridge there at first, LOL.

Who was the last Bears OL to wear 72?  I'm thinking Stan Thomas but I could be wrong.

If Barber stays healthy and runs with bad intentions, he could be the steal of FA...  not just for the Bears, but anyone.  Our short yardage woes would be a thing of the past...  assuming of course Martz is smart enough to use him. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 05, 2011, 04:22:02 pm
Both  those guys look real good in Blue and Orange.  Real good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 05, 2011, 04:28:23 pm
All I know is it's gonna be really nice to see a Bears OL on the field that looks like they belong in the NFL and not on a Div II college roster. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 05, 2011, 06:15:52 pm
Suntimes reports that Friday night's practice at Soldier is cancelled (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/6904876-606/bears-family-night-canceled.html) due to

:::drum roll:::





"poor field conditions."  Unfuuckingbelievable.

McCaskey defends Soldier Field turf (http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/6828400/chicago-bears-president-george-mccaskey-said-keep-soldier-field-natural-grass-surface-safety-issue)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 05, 2011, 06:50:30 pm
My guess is the Bears want artificial turf but part of the soldier field deal with Daley was to leave it as is to keep union employees working on the field the city destroys.  So they allow the players to **** about it while management tows the line for Daley.  Just a hunch.

Remember the Bears had artificial turf and Dikta got the ownership to do away with it.  Back the it was a good move due to the terrible tachnology of artifical turf then.  The new stuff is awesome.  The Bears need what the Packers have but one generation better imo.

It would save the city and the Bears money.  Occams Razor sugest the only obvious conclusion is that the mayor needs the union votes and the union wants things as they are.  This is how Chicago politics works.

Why else would it not be done by now?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 05, 2011, 08:13:15 pm
My hope is that with all the myriad players brought in on the Dline side that they'll get the right combination together. I mean goodnight! How many people are fighting for a few spots?? This should be happening on the Oline side!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 05, 2011, 08:41:25 pm
I 100% agree sporty.  I love what they did on the D-line.  I am pissed they did not do the same for the O-line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 05, 2011, 09:51:35 pm

A bit different situation with d-line vs. o-line.  Bears 4-3 tackles are not a good fit for a 3-4 team.  4-3 defensive ends are not as athletic as most 3-4 OLBs and not quite as big as the 3-4 end.  Might have explained the ability to draft Paea and sign Okoye.

But every team can use a good O-lineman pretty much regardless of size.

Now Angelo did add a rookie and a FA to the O-line.  Garza should be steady at RG.  Webb is a HUGE question mark though and Chris Williams could be the weakest link.  And they expect Spaeth to be an upgrade to Manu - so that counts as half an offensive lineman.

We'll get an idea if Angelo did enough after the preseason game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 05, 2011, 10:05:43 pm
Well we have a new Mayor and I am sure he might not approve of the black eye the Park District is getting. Maybe there is hope something will change
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 06, 2011, 06:43:21 am
Yapper - Stan Thomas wore number 60.  I can't recall a Bear wearing 72 other than Perry.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 06, 2011, 06:44:29 am
My guess is the Bears want artificial turf but part of the soldier field deal with Daley was to leave it as is to keep union employees working on the field the city destroys.  So they allow the players to **** about it while management tows the line for Daley.  Just a hunch.

Remember the Bears had artificial turf and Dikta got the ownership to do away with it.  Back the it was a good move due to the terrible tachnology of artifical turf then.  The new stuff is awesome.  The Bears need what the Packers have but one generation better imo.

It would save the city and the Bears money.  Occams Razor sugest the only obvious conclusion is that the mayor needs the union votes and the union wants things as they are.  This is how Chicago politics works.

Why else would it not be done by now?

Pekin - I have never heard it explained like that.  That would make total sense in my opinion, why else does the sodded field remain?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 06, 2011, 08:04:55 am
The Bears and players have long favored natural grass over artificial turf and for some reason the Bears have straddled the fence by saying that they need to do some investigation into switching from grass to artificial and nothing ever comes of it. While there maybe some validity to claim that its in the Bears/Park District contract that the surface be natural grass with union laborers, that I dont know, but we have a new mayor and he is changing some things so maybe the Bears need to approach the Mayor quietly and legislate a change if they want to switch to the new artificial turf. In the end something has to change and the surface needs to improve. If the Bears ever wanted out of their Soldiers Field lease, they sure as heck have a legitimate way to break the lease. If I am not mistaken the seating capacity is the smallest in the league.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 06, 2011, 10:23:07 am
Odd that this issue has come up in summer - its usually a winter thing.

No problems with grass at Wrigley...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 06, 2011, 10:59:50 am
The explanation is that the parks crew did not water it enough in this heat and that is why it is in poor condition.  That to me is inexcusable.

These are supoosed to be professionals.  Everyone knows when it is hot and there has not been much rain you have to water the damn grass.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 06, 2011, 11:00:32 am
If they are this inept it is no wonder they are always re-sodding in December when the grass can't take root.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 06, 2011, 11:25:02 am
One thing that's good, Collins is gone. After last season, I would've thought we would've gone full bore fixing the o line. That's been a bit of a disappointment. Not too worried about Carimi, give the guy some time. I'm ready for some football..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 06, 2011, 11:30:50 am
When I visited the family down around the Rockford area a month ago, I was taken aback at how brown and dry everyone's lawn was.  It seemed like Illinois was having a serious drought or something.  How in the bloody he!! do you fail to water the field of a supposed NFL stadium before a scheduled football event?  Union or not, jobs should be lost for BS like that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 06, 2011, 11:36:10 am
Fat ass Harrison is back on the field attempting to delay his inevitable status as yet another cut Angelo draft pick.  It's a crowded field at DT.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 06, 2011, 02:53:16 pm
Crowded is right...they could line up a DL from endzone to endzone!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 06, 2011, 03:01:18 pm
I don't know what Harrison's problem has been - he has the talent not so sure of the desire.  Barring injury I just don't see how he makes the team.

If you haven't seen this you might want to take a look.  It's our d-line going up against the o-line in a pass rush drill - guess which side looked better?

http://www.chicagobears.com/multimedia/multimediapopup.asp?mm_file_id=2423&play_clip=Y&rn=8
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 06, 2011, 03:42:23 pm
That Oline sucks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 06, 2011, 03:57:57 pm
Disgusted Urlacher lobbies for FieldTurf

"We're a fast team. We play fast on FieldTurf."


Vaughn McClure/Tribune reporter
August 6, 2011/1:11 p.m. CDT


Bears linebacker Brian Urlacher voiced his displeasure with the Soldier Field playing surface a day after unsafe field conditions caused the team's Family Fest practice to be canceled.

"It's a joke," Urlacher said. "I don't understand (why) they can't have the field ready. It sucks for the fans because I'm sure it was a pain in the butt to get down there with the all traffic and everything. I think coach (Lovie Smith) did the right thing in not letting us practice on that stuff."

Tim LeFevour, general manager of Soldier Field, took responsibility for the playing surface being unsafe for the Bears' Family Fest practice Friday night, but LeFevour assured the field would be ready for next Saturday’s preseason opener against Buffalo.

"Over the last few weeks, we've had some extreme heat conditions,'' LeFevour explained Friday. "It was a miscalculation on our ground crew's part. They did not get enough water on the field. Some of the seams opened up. It's not an issue or concern with next week's game. We know it can be corrected. But in the best interest of the team tonight, it was the right move to send them back to Bourbonnais to practice.''

The Bears practiced until 10:30 p.m.after returning to Bourbonnais from Chicago.

The field has been an issue for quite some time and has raised the question on whether the Bears should install FieldTurf.

"I don't understand why we don't have FieldTurf yet," Urlacher said. "We're a fast team. We play fast on FieldTurf.

The injury issues (with FieldTurf) aren't as bad as they used to be."

Urlacher said he is hopeful next weekend's game is not called off due to field issues. LeFevour promised Soldier Field would be ready.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 06, 2011, 04:22:44 pm
I wonder whether its possible that some team needs a DT such as Harrison and might give us an OG for him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 06, 2011, 07:12:39 pm
The best hope we have for getting a decent backup guard is to hope a team that has great depth lets someone go on cut day.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on August 06, 2011, 07:47:52 pm
I wonder how long it would take to install that field turf stuff?  I wonder if it could be done in the four weeks the Bears play in Europe and then on a bye week then on the road when they come back?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 06, 2011, 08:47:19 pm
It would take several years just to get the City Council to vote on it.  And that doesn't include time to gather together the necessary bribes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 06, 2011, 09:01:50 pm
Why cant we get the combo turf/real grass.  Seems like the perfect solution for everyone.  Well except the guys who sell the sod that we replace twice a year....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 07, 2011, 12:45:16 am
The third-year Bears receiver never imagined losing his starting job, not after leading the Bears with 960 receiving yards last season. Yet when Roy Williams finally joined the Bears for practice Thursday night, Knox watched as Williams and Devin Hester lined up as the starters.


Williams and Hester could be among the league leaders in dropped passes next season.

"
The Bears are confident the 6-foot-3, 215-pound Williams can be the reliable big target based on his success in offensive coordinator Mike Martz's system in Detroit. Knox plays the same "X" receiver position as Williams.

"You don't bring a Roy Williams in here to sit on the bench," receivers coach Darryl Drake said.


I can't believe he said that..so I guess Angelo is buying groceries AND cooking the meals..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 07, 2011, 06:51:07 am
Wow, I can't believe they just hand him the job after his production the last 2 years.  Not that Knox is an all pro, but I think having competition is the best way to sort that out.  It's a long season, I am sure Knox will be on the field plenty and 4 receiver sets withKnox, Williams, Hester, and Bennett will be interesting to watch.  We are definitely stronger at the position with Williams.  I'd like to see more creativity used with Knox and Hester due to their after the catch ability.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 07, 2011, 07:32:33 am
If Roy Williams starts dropping passes and Knox hangs on to whatever is thrown his way, Know will be getting the playing time.  Williams is not immune from getting into Martz' dog house. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 07, 2011, 09:35:31 am
Sat., Aug. 6 practice observations
By Mark Potash on August 6, 2011 5:35 PM

The Bears' mid-afternoon practice was as spirited as it could be on a steamy day in Bourbonnais Saturday -- exactly a week from their preseason lidlifter against the Buffalo Bills next Saturday at Soldier Field -- playing conditions pending, of course.

WR Johnny Knox did not practice because of a lower-back issue. He's day-to-day, but sounded as if being held out was just a precaution at this point.
Rookie LB J.T. Thomas (lower leg) and second-year LB Chris Johnson also did not practice.

Maybe it was just coincidence, but without Martz, the defense seemed to make more plays in practice Saturday. Charles Tillman had three pass breakups, including a good play against Devin Hester over the middle in 7-on-7. Lance Briggs also had a pass breakup, thwarting a Jay Cutler-to-Earl Bennett connection.

Hester still made the play of the day, beating Tim Jennings for a touchdown on a pass from Cutler to the upper-right corner of the end zone. It was a great route by Hester and a perfect-touch throw by Cutler more than a mistake by Jennings on the play.

Sam Hurd looks like he's going to make a serious run at a receiver spot. He made a reaching grab on a slant from Caleb Hanie for a touchdown in 7-on-7.

The Bears are working hard on their running game, especially with utilizing TEs Kellen Davis and Matt Spaeth. It looks like a work-in-progress, but they're going against a pretty good run defense, which has the edge in practice.

Anthony Adams, all 6-0 of him, leaped in the air to solidly bat down a Cutler pass.

Two plays later, Cutler threaded the needle to hit Kellen Davis over the middle for a big gain.

Rookie safety Anthony Walters made a nice play to break up a pass for 6-3 WR Kris Adams on a pass from Hanie.

Roy Williams made only one catch -- on the first play of 7-on-7 -- but wasn't target very often, if at all, after that.

For what it's worth, of all the Bears defensive linemen, I'm noticing Corey Wootton the most. He's very aggressive and going all out on every play. I'll bet he looks good on film, too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 07, 2011, 07:25:48 pm
Is it just coincidence that Knox loses his starting job to Williams one day and cant practice because of a back issue the next?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on August 07, 2011, 07:44:52 pm
I think if you read between the lines of what has been said over the past two years, Knox has a tendence to break off routes.  This has led to interceptions.  Cutler has never thrown him under the bus, but I know for a fact that Knox broke the route 2 years ago at Atlanta game on final drive.  Media and everyone blamed Cutler for interception.  Funny thing was their was no WR around, QB's just don't throw to unoccupied areas.  WR's are suppose to follow a path...when they break that the QB can look stupid even when it is not their fault.

I think Martz and Williams recently emphasized that Williams strenght "is being were the QB expects you to be".  Saying things like he doesn't like to fool the QB by breaking routes.  I think the coaches told him that was a problem with some of the current WR's; that's why he emphasized it in interviews.  Martz recently did the same thing in interview. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 08, 2011, 07:12:16 am
Here is an eye catcher :o :o :o :o

Tice sets Bears' starting five O-line, unless they 'falter'

By Brad Biggs, Tribune reporter
 
10:07 p.m. CDT, August 7, 2011
BOURBONNAIS -- There aren’t snaps on the ground like there were the first day of training camp.

The run blocking has been solid since pads went on last Monday.

Mike Tice has seen enough, to this point, to declare his starting five on the offensive line, something that would seem to make it challenging for newcomer Chris Spencer to crack the lineup. Tice said that unless one of his five starters “falters” what he has now is the line the team will use in five weeks when the regular season opens Sept. 11 against the Atlanta Falcons at Soldier Field.

That means Roberto Garza will remain at center with Chris Williams at left guard and Lance Louis at right guard. J’Marcus Webb is the left tackle with rookie first-round pick Gabe Carimi set at right tackle. Tice already calls Carimi an “elite run blocker.”

This doesn’t mean Spencer, who signed a $6 million, two-year contract, will be riding the bench. But it does speak to how Tice feels about the job the starting five has done to this point, particularly the play of Louis, who started the first four games a year ago.

“I’ve got, I think right now, the five best guys on the field and we’re going to stay that way until something proves me I’m wrong,” Tice said.

Asked several times to clarify the situation, Tice repeated himself.

“I have five guys in there starting,” he said. “Unless they falter, that's who's opening the season against Atlanta."

So, nothing is set in stone but it appears the Bears want to move toward a decision sooner rather than later. Clearly, Garza has done a solid job at center. The Bears made five lineup changes on the line in the first eight games last season. Settling on one early would be a considerable help based on how the team felt the unit played when it settled in.

One primary reason not to rule Spencer out at center? Moving Garza to right guard could allow him to work alongside the inexperienced Carimi. The Bears felt Garza did a nice job alongside Webb last season and might want to have a veteran influence next to the right tackle.

But for now, the five are set.

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 08, 2011, 07:41:13 am
Wasnt Louis's play last year a part of the OL problem last year? ::)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 08, 2011, 07:45:10 am
Corey Wootton shines at Bears camp

BY Mark Potash mpotash@suntimes.com

August 8, 2011 2:10AM



BOURBONNAIS, Ill. — Corey Wootton made an ­impact in his rookie season that reverberated throughout the NFL. It was his hit and sack of Brett Favre in December that put an end to Favre’s career.

‘‘I hear about that a lot — especially in Chicago,’’ Wootton said. ‘‘But that’s not the only thing I want to be ­remembered for.’’

Wootton played in six games as a rookie. But even after a week of training-camp practices that can fool anybody about anything, it looks like he’s determined to make a bigger impact in 2011 as the third defensive end behind Julius Peppers and Israel Idonije.

The 6-6, 270-pounder from Northwestern is hard to miss in practices, using his size, speed and aggressiveness to challenge any lineman.

Defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli has noticed.


‘‘I like what Wootton has done in camp,’’ Marinelli said. ‘‘He looks quick [and] fast. . . . He’s smart. He’s got great tempo. He’s trimmed down.’’

Mark Potash
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 08, 2011, 10:33:37 am
Gotta love the kool-aid that's being made this time of the year. Let's see if the Cutler sack-o-meter is going down after a couple of games, or up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on August 08, 2011, 10:45:52 am
The oline is going to be "interesting" to say the least this season.....

Ruskell got Spencer, gave him a lotta dough, and he can't start ? Jeez.....

"I am Jerry Angelo (along with Tim Ruskell), destroyer of NFL frachises ! Look upon me and despair !"

Here's hoping the benching is just a motivational thing.......
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on August 08, 2011, 11:12:11 am
The oline is going to be "interesting" to say the least this season.....

Ruskell got Spencer, gave him a lotta dough, and he can't start ? Jeez.....

"I am Jerry Angelo (along with Tim Ruskell), destroyer of NFL frachises ! Look upon me and despair !"

Here's hoping the benching is just a motivational thing.......

Angelost and The Ruskinator...the Dynemic Duo!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 08, 2011, 11:39:11 am
Um, if the playbook is as big as I read, Spencer probably doesnt know everything yet, and you want him to start?  Cutler will get killed even faster.  Give him a chance to get up to speed, and we can see what he can do.  Not deflecting blame from Angie or Ruskell, just saying lets not jump off any ledges just yet. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 08, 2011, 11:58:25 am
I think if you read between the lines of what has been said over the past two years, Knox has a tendence to break off routes.  This has led to interceptions.  Cutler has never thrown him under the bus, but I know for a fact that Knox broke the route 2 years ago at Atlanta game on final drive.  Media and everyone blamed Cutler for interception.  Funny thing was their was no WR around, QB's just don't throw to unoccupied areas.  WR's are suppose to follow a path...when they break that the QB can look stupid even when it is not their fault.

I think Martz and Williams recently emphasized that Williams strenght "is being were the QB expects you to be".  Saying things like he doesn't like to fool the QB by breaking routes.  I think the coaches told him that was a problem with some of the current WR's; that's why he emphasized it in interviews.  Martz recently did the same thing in interview. 


I don't buy this one second.  What has Williams proven so far to make me feel he's better than Knox?  Williams has been in decline the last 3 seasons while Knox is blooming and only going to get better.

Nice going Martz.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 08, 2011, 12:01:13 pm
Admittedly the playbook is huge but the way Tice was talking the line might be set, although I have difficulty believing that after last year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest118 on August 08, 2011, 12:02:16 pm
They said Knox doesn't run good routess - still. + Knox can't be physical with the corners. I like Knox WAY better than Williams.

We will see - Williams drops a ton of passes. You have to wonder why he didn't make it with the Cowboys? He isn't going to have it any easier here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest118 on August 08, 2011, 12:04:55 pm
I am NOT an Angelo fan...but...

He got us to the Super Bowl once and the NFC title game last year. That's a lomore than the couple guys before him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 08, 2011, 12:41:24 pm
With a better Oline we could have won thw Superbowl last year. If what you strive for isnt the Superbowl then why even play?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on August 08, 2011, 01:30:20 pm
Not sure what to think about Williams. Was inTexas last week and one of my co-workers from Dallas was telling me that the perception of Williams in Dallas was that the playbook was complicated and he was slow to catch on. If true that does not bode will given the Martz playbook unless he learned a lot of it in Detroit and remembers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 08, 2011, 03:59:53 pm
Knox seemed to me to catch balls thrown his way, so now Martz doesn't like the way he catches the ball? If Williams runs perfect routes, blows by everybody, and drops the phucking ball, he's still the starter? Because of the way he runs a route and drops the ball?  Aren't we missing the point here? CATCH THE PHUCKING BALLl?!??
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on August 08, 2011, 04:34:59 pm
Tice is setting the lineup after a few days in camp sending a message to the other guys to beat out the "starters"

The starters are challenged to hold their jobs, which they may not be able to do.

I see this as just a challenge to his players rather than proclaiming starters.

As for Williams and Knox, there are enough plays to go around for both.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 08, 2011, 04:35:28 pm
Knox had 960 receiving yards last season but he doesn't run 'perfect" routes?

Seems like he's doing SOMETHING right with him almost having a 1000 yard receiving season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on August 08, 2011, 06:03:38 pm
Don't get me wrong...I like what Knox brings with speed and I am not necessarly a Williams fan (although hoping to become one).  I just think from what I have read that they are saying someone is not running routes the right way.  I think from watching the games it is Knox.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on August 08, 2011, 06:09:20 pm
Your boy Roy's website:

http://chicagofootballtalk.com/

He has Youtube video breaking down Chris Spencer...ouch...not feeling real great about that pick up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 08, 2011, 06:14:08 pm
http://www.suntimes.com/6935046-417/bears-plan-for-devin-hester-to-play-bigger-offensive-role-this-season.html

Drake said Knox and Roy Williams will battle for the split-end position. He said Knox has “got to improve,” without providing anything specific.
 
But Knox led all NFL receivers in one dubious ­statistic: most interceptions on passes intended for him (11).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on August 08, 2011, 07:40:07 pm
Knox stops on routes blocked by defenders.

You know it, I know it, and the American people know it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 08, 2011, 09:13:09 pm

 The WR placements sound like the OL of last year.

 Split end .. slot ... flanker. Plus Martz multiples beyond three.

 Here we go again ... put this guy there ...whats the result ... put that guy there ... whats the result?

 Seems like the usual feeling out of what player does best at one point in time before they also find out he's good at another position also.

 Lets see a game played ... for real. Things should settle into place after that. BULLSHIIIIT!

 Its going to keep evolving as it did with the OL last season ... whatever it takes to win ...

 is the bottem line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 08, 2011, 09:56:51 pm
Tice didn't say that the current OL would start the season.  He merely said that the current OL would start the first exhibition game.  Like most coaches, he doesn't like a starter to lose his job in practice.  I suspect that if anyone on the OL does poorly in the first exhibition game, he will be in dire danger of losing his job long before the season starts.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 08, 2011, 10:10:10 pm
Tice didn't say that the current OL would start the season.  He merely said that the current OL would start the first exhibition game.  Like most coaches, he doesn't like a starter to lose his job in practice.  I suspect that if anyone on the OL does poorly in the first exhibition game, he will be in dire danger of losing his job long before the season starts.

 Agreed DaveP, the whole OFFENSE will be in a state of flux going into the first few games,

 this becomes more of the Martz plan and cutting past coaches plans.

 Roy Williams is the Martz signature coming into play. He got numbers out of him at Deeeeetroit.

 Sam Hurd and Barber are two that he saw that should intrigue also ... lets hope he's right.

 Thats alotta Cowboys that the Cowboys didnt want anymore. We had the money to be Philly.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 08, 2011, 10:11:11 pm
Tice didn't say that the current OL would start the season.  He merely said that the current OL would start the first exhibition game.  Like most coaches, he doesn't like a starter to lose his job in practice.  I suspect that if anyone on the OL does poorly in the first exhibition game, he will be in dire danger of losing his job long before the season starts.

What he said was this:Tice said that unless one of his five starters “falters” what he has now is the line the team will use in five weeks when the regular season opens Sept. 11 against the Atlanta Falcons at Soldier Field. And how long do the starters play in the preseason? One series, maybe a quarter? And how badly do they really have to play in order to lose their job? It took a couple of games into the season before the line imploded last year. Personally I hope it does implode before the season begins. I'd rather not wait till the games count before we see improvement.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 08, 2011, 10:18:24 pm
What do you think the odds are that the five that start the first exhibition game will also start the season?  I would say about one in ten.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 08, 2011, 10:25:05 pm
What he said was this:Tice said that unless one of his five starters “falters” what he has now is the line the team will use in five weeks when the regular season opens Sept. 11 against the Atlanta Falcons at Soldier Field. And how long do the starters play in the preseason? One series, maybe a quarter? And how badly do they really have to play in order to lose their job? It took a couple of games into the season before the line imploded last year. Personally I hope it does implode before the season begins. I'd rather not wait till the games count before we see improvement.

 At the same time last year with the rotations nothing jelled until after the bye week when we went on to win five straight.

 We are in a state of transition at OL as we are every year ... would we all want to see an OL line that is rock steady day one?

 You know we would ... but the OL has been a backburner issue with angelo forever ...

 the fact that he even acknowledged it exists is nothing short of a miracle.

 Tice isnt the problem ... the OL isnt the problem ... the problem is ... insert name here :

 _______________________________________________________
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 08, 2011, 10:27:04 pm
What do you think the odds are that the five that start the first exhibition game will also start the season?  I would say about one in ten.

 No way I'm taking odds on this one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 08, 2011, 10:29:40 pm

 BTW ... we have generated enough posts to get advertising.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 08, 2011, 10:32:26 pm
Is that good?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 08, 2011, 10:36:49 pm
What do you think the odds are that the five that start the first exhibition game will also start the season?  I would say about one in ten.

Depends on how much the "starters" play and how hard the opposition plays during the exibition games. My guess is likely pretty good, probably better than 50-50.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 08, 2011, 10:41:39 pm
Is that good?

 It sure is. First Dave23 gets some coin ... and if enough coin is generated after that the censorship

 of words gets removed. It wont be a generic board anymore but OUR board. So keep posting!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 08, 2011, 10:44:38 pm
You know we would ... but the OL has been a backburner issue with angelo forever ...

 the fact that he even acknowledged it exists is nothing short of a miracle.


Doesnt that scare you? It should.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 08, 2011, 10:48:00 pm
Depends on how much the "starters" play and how hard the opposition plays during the exibition games. My guess is likely pretty good, probably better than 50-50.

 Shiiiit we dont even know who the starters are going forward ... only games played will tell.

 One things for sure ... we have to be better then we were last season.  :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 08, 2011, 11:18:22 pm
Maybe defensively, but that Oline will prevent drastic improvement offensively.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 08, 2011, 11:29:16 pm
Maybe defensively, but that Oline will prevent drastic improvement offensively.

 Dont know ... never seen this OL as it evolves ... play ... yet.

 I had us at 6-10 last year. We were one game away from a Superbowl when the dust settled.

 I'll believe what I see as the facts unfold ... I'm not about to project shiiiit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 12:02:10 am
Before their off week the OL gave up 4.5 sacks per game.

After their off week, the OL gave up 2.6 sacks per game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 09, 2011, 12:18:47 am
The reason Tice is 'setting' the Oline this early is because last season it wasn't set and he probably took a ton of criticism for it. They were trying to find a setup that gelled together and it took forever. So he knows who he has for the most part now unlike last year. Do I think it's a good thing? That he knows them,yea...that he's set the line so quickly? Probably not...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 09, 2011, 06:02:33 am
I am NOT an Angelo fan...but...

He got us to the Super Bowl once and the NFC title game last year. That's a lomore than the couple guys before him.

Couldn't have said it better.  It's like some of you think Angelo is deliberately trying to sabotage the team every year.  Thank God, the players try to cover for his ineptness...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 09, 2011, 07:02:40 am
Agree. Now, if we could get Angelo to let someone else make our selection in the  first round of the draft, we'd be set..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 09, 2011, 08:00:59 am
Before their off week the OL gave up 4.5 sacks per game.

After their off week, the OL gave up 2.6 sacks per game.

And by that you are saying that 2.6 is acceptable to you? It shouldnt, by me or by the Bears
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 09, 2011, 08:21:02 am
I''l take 2.6 over 4.5 any day of the week. But yes, one sack is too many..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 09, 2011, 09:03:17 am
still not sure how well we pass blocked the last half of the season, we were running the ball a good bit more.
If I am playing  Martz, I pin my ears back and rush the passer. He lives by the pass and doesn't want to run. Running is boring to him.

You might get burned by a few screens and draws but much of the time you would be making Cutler run for his life.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 11:46:44 am
And by that you are saying that 2.6 is acceptable to you? It shouldnt, by me or by the Bears

No.  I am saying that the Oline showed substantial improvement as time went on.  It is not unreasonable to think that that improvement will continue into this season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 09, 2011, 12:49:56 pm
No.  I am saying that the Oline showed substantial improvement as time went on.  It is not unreasonable to think that that improvement will continue into this season.

So that means that the Oline will pick up where it left off last year and improve? And what guarantees do we have of that? Zero!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 12:53:34 pm
What guarantee do you have that you will be alive on opening day.

As far as I know, there are no guarantees of anything in this world.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on August 09, 2011, 01:02:17 pm
Death and taxes ! :D


"The only true guarentee in this world is that tommorrow will not be today."- my grandpa
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 01:08:41 pm
Death and taxes ! :D

And government programs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 09, 2011, 01:45:58 pm
What guarantee do you have that you will be alive on opening day.

As far as I know, there are no guarantees of anything in this world.

Davep, I thought you said when someone can't guarantee anything they're lying!  :)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 09, 2011, 03:00:07 pm
What guarantee do you have that you will be alive on opening day.

As far as I know, there are no guarantees of anything in this world.

Oh Jesus Christ!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 03:10:30 pm
Davep, I thought you said when someone can't guarantee anything they're lying!  :)

You don't read very well, Phil.  I said that when Obama could not guarantee that social security checks would go out on time, HE was lying.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 09, 2011, 03:17:29 pm
Only quoted what you said.   Keep your chin up though since you can't "guarantee" anything which means you're lying!!!! 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 04:07:13 pm
Word games, Phil.  Try to read context sometime.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 09, 2011, 04:49:12 pm
LOL!!!  You're a piece of work.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 09, 2011, 04:50:12 pm
But I do agree with your assessment of how the offensive line performed late in the year.

The line did well in the playoffs and if not for Cutler and Martz the Bears would've been in the Super Bowl.  I don't blame the line at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 09, 2011, 06:12:09 pm
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Can-the-Bears-offensive-line-be-a-strength-in-2011.html

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 09, 2011, 09:53:58 pm
Nice article. It sure exudes hope. I hope it turns out accurate.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 09, 2011, 10:07:46 pm
watch, our OL will gel and be a strength and the D will implode.
I don't expect it but it wouldn't surprise me either.
If our OL gels we could be the greatest show on the dead brown grass!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 09, 2011, 10:31:43 pm
Again Greg Gabriel is a former employee of the Bears.  However he was fired and was very bitter in his articles last year.

So either he actually sees something or is trying to get his job back in the case Angello goes and Ruskell needs help. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 09, 2011, 11:06:13 pm
I wouldnt trust Ruskell any farther than I could throw him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on August 09, 2011, 11:12:23 pm
Wish the Chicago media would give some real information like in the Gabriel article.

Nice to see Louis and Webb have bulked up and Williams showing better technique.

Bigger guards is something our running game has lacked in past years.

I'm less concerned about Webb at LT after reading this.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 09, 2011, 11:24:34 pm
The weakest link on the OLine I thought was Chris Williams. Seems he has learned to use his size and athleticism better. He and Omiyale looked lost. That article gave me some hope. Watched CSN Chicago and they had Carimi on and he said his biggest adjustment was moving to the right side and he is improving. It helps going up against Izzy and Peppers in practice.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 10, 2011, 07:14:57 am
Interesting vid on Spencer.  But keep in mind that he showed highlights from that one playoff game.  I'm sure if you had time to kill you could compile a whole host of "lowlights" of last season not only from Kruetz, but from the whole cast of characters that Tice has annointed as his starting 5..."unless someone falters" of course.

My second biggest concern on this team next to the OL are the DBs, particularly the CBs.  I'm not hearing good things about Jennings so far.  At least one beat reporter has said that Bowman doesn't seem ready to grab the starting gig by the horns.  Pretty disappointing considering he's a bigger better athlete than Jennings and that he was tough enough to try to shed the injury prone label by grabbing an INT with busted bicep.  I hear good things about D.J. Moore at nickel.  Josh Moore (Mr. 2 reps of 225lb) has really worked hard to get stronger.  Will Graham get an opportunity or will he be biding time at specials for one more year?  Unless his physical was subpar or if he's still feeling the effects of his neck injury, I am going to be disappointed if they let Hayden get away.  They need depth there IMO.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 10, 2011, 07:22:46 am
I am excited about the DL, especially the young DTs and Wooten.  Hopefully the pressure at the edge and up the middle against Rodgers, Brees, and others will help keep the pressure off the CBs.

Gholston has been a ghost so far and him and Harrison will probably be one of the first cuts unless they do something against Buffalo.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 10, 2011, 07:33:36 am
strap the pads on, let's go! I'm ready!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 10, 2011, 07:56:12 am
I am definitely happy with our new DL. I am hoping that with the new additions giving us more pressure up the middle we wont have to need better DBs. TG we wont have to put up with dismal Tommy Harris. That has to be an improvement right there
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 10, 2011, 08:38:20 am
Bears don't waste time getting offensive line set
Garza takes over for Kreutz at center
     
 
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
7:27 p.m. CDT, August 8, 2011
BOURBONNAIS — The starters might not be in the game for long Saturday night, but as far as first tests go for Roberto Garza, the Bills' Kyle Williams will be a good one.

Bears offensive line coach Mike Tice effectively named Garza the replacement for captain and six-time Pro Bowl center Olin Kreutz on Sunday night. It was a surprising development from the standpoint there was no need for the Bears to set their line this early in camp.

But after changing the lineup five times through the first eight games last season, the team saw the unit gel in the second half when things settled. By making a decision early, there's more time for the unit to grow.

If all goes as planned, Garza will open the season at his third position in as many years. He was at left guard to open 2010 and has started 73 of the last 80 regular-season games at right guard.

Garza will go against Williams, who was selected as an alternate to the last two Pro Bowls, in his first extended exposure to center since starting the 2001 season finale as a rookie for the Falcons. Garza was the center for the second start of Michael Vick's career. That's how long ago it was.

"I'm going to get nervous and it's going to be fun," Garza said. "I don't know about comfortable, but I am getting better every day. It's a work in progress."

The exchange with quarterback Jay Cutler has been clean in practice.

"That's the hard part you forget when you play guard," Garza said. "Jay has been working with me. It's early in training camp and we've still got a long way to go because that starts off the whole play. You have to get the ball up in his hands and get rolling because you've got a guy on top of you."

The early announcement of the line, nearly five weeks before the Sept. 11 opener against the Falcons, signals four clear points:

1. Right guard Lance Louis has made considerable progress from a year ago when he won the job coming out of training camp. In the event a shakeup does happen, don't rule out Louis competing with former first-round draft pick Chris Williams for the left guard job.

2. Newly signed center Chris Spencer is a ways off from being schooled in the offense and comfortable with the calls to lead the huddle and direct the offense at the line of scrimmage. Based on his contract, you'd expect Spencer to figure in the mix at some point, but the offense isn't waiting around.

3. There are high expectations for rookie first-round draft pick Gabe Carimi, who looks the part on the side that's new to him — right tackle. If Tice was concerned about Carimi needing help, he'd probably find a way to get Garza next to him at right guard. The feeling was Garza was a settling influence on J'Marcus Webb last season.

4. While uncertainty surrounded the line at this time a year ago, there's a quiet confidence building. The belief is the revamped line — Williams is the only starter who finished in the spot he's in now — will surprise people.

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on August 10, 2011, 08:59:28 am
We'l l just have to see if the moves "RuskAngelo" have done pan out....

I think we will be suprised....

Just saw a stat that by age, the Bears are like the 4th oldest D in the league (but on the plus side the oldest listed D's were also some of the best in the league last year)....

Its now or never for RuskAngelo.......
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 10, 2011, 10:13:32 am
Angelo happy with the way Bears coming together
GM likes mesh of new players and players already on board
   
Dan Pompei
 
On the NFL
 
9:26 p.m. CDT, August 8, 2011
BOURBONNAIS — Just because the Bears didn't add an offensive line version of Julius Peppers does not mean their offseason plan was foiled.

In fact, the plan worked out very much how general manager Jerry Angelo hoped it would. Part of that plan was adding several veterans, and part of that plan included leaving room for young Bears to grow.

"We are happy with how it worked out," Angelo said Monday in his dorm room office on the campus of Olivet Nazarene. "I felt like we upgraded our football team. These players still have to come in, fit in and make their way. Based on what we've seen now, it's been a good mesh with these new players and the players we already had."

Angelo explained the team approached free agency thinking it could field a solid starting lineup with even if the Bears added no one. Included in that nucleus were a number of former draft picks the team is counting on to play bigger roles.

Given that there were many more available free agents than usual, the Bears tried to be open to what the market presented them.

"We weren't going to shut the door on anything, but if we could get good players at good values, that was appealing," he said. "It wasn't like we were out there looking for only blue light specials. We weren't saving up for a rainy day."

In fact, Angelo said the team's cash budget for players is consistent with what it has been in past years. And the Bears still have both cash and salary cap space to keep dealing.

"We're still looking, and there are some very good players out there," Angelo said. "It's an unprecedented time. But at this point, it's about getting a guy in a rotation, better depth. We're not going to find somebody who is going to come in here and push the top down. That's not going to happen. You're trying to make the middle or bottom better at this point."

In particular, the team is still looking at cornerbacks, linebackers who can contribute on special teams and defensive ends. The Bears brought in former Colts cornerback Kelvin Hayden for a visit and medical exam Monday.

The team's hope is that some good players currently on rosters will still be released, as recent additions Roy Williams, Marion Barber and Amobi Okoye were.

"There are eight new head coaches, and a few coordinator changes, so there will be some fallout there," Angelo said. "When you look at the wire, there will be some players who are square pegs in round holes who will be good fits for us."

The Bears were interested in some of the defensive ends who have signed with other teams but chose to spend their money elsewhere.

"It's a supply and demand business, and those guys have value," Angelo said. "It came down to allocation of funds. We felt we needed to look at other areas. We have Corey Wootton, and hopefully he's going to take a step."

Some of what the Bears did, or didn't do, can be traced to their commitment to player development. After talking with a few free-agent offensive linemen, the Bears chose to stand pat, other than signing Chris Spencer as a replacement for Olin Kreutz.

"We have a good history of picking up free agents at the position, and there is nothing wrong with that," Angelo said, pointing to Roberto Garza, John Tait, Ruben Brown and Fred Miller. "But we want to bring along young guys.

"Mike Tice has a great track record of developing young players. He is a great evaluator, a great teacher and developer of players. We want to take advantage of his expertise and that's why we want to start bringing these young guys along. Just because they are unknown doesn't mean they won't be good players. At some point the player has to start from the bottom and work his way up."

From the looks of it now, the Bears will be starting three blockers with very little experience, as rookie Gabe Carimi, second-year man J'Marcus Webb and third-year man Lance Louis all are running with the first team.

"We made our bed," Angelo said. "We have to make it work. You can't have stars at every position. It doesn't work that way."

The Bears are saving some of their cap space and cash for Matt Forte's contract extension. Angelo said the team has yet to begin negotiating with Forte, but the plan is to start soon.

In a normal year, either Forte would have been extended by now, or talks would have been tabled. NFL teams were not allowed to negotiate contracts during the lockout.

As for Forte's unrest and talk about sitting out exhibition games, which have been obvious in his public statements, Angelo said, "We've had a real good track record about extensions. I've told Matt to focus on being the best he can be and doing his job. We'll do the same."

It's all part of the Bears' plan.

dpompei@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 10, 2011, 10:37:59 am
Player safety reason for Bears' preference to natural grass
McCaskey pledges team will take a more hands-on role in supervising Soldier Field's turf
     
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
7:53 p.m. CDT, August 8, 2011
BOURBONNAIS — George McCaskey attended the Fire-Manchester United soccer match July 23 at Soldier Field, so he knows the fresh sod put down last month can look good.

But the Bears chairman of the board was mystified the playing surface was deemed unsafe for the team's scheduled practice and Family Fest at the stadium Friday, a stunning fumble by the Chicago Park District that has only refueled the debate of an artificial surface versus the grass that's typically in poor shape come November.

McCaskey, who visited the stadium Sunday to inspect repair of the turf that buckled at seams because the Park District failed to properly water the sod, is confident it will be in excellent condition for Saturday's exhibition opener against the Bills.

Rain over the weekend "helped tremendously," and the field now appears to be in playable condition, said Luca Serra, a spokesman for SMG, the Philadelphia-based company hired to run the stadium.

"It will be in playing condition for Saturday's game," Park District spokeswoman Jessica Maxey-Faulkner said.

The turn of events hasn't changed McCaskey's mind about what is best for the organization.

"Our primary concern is player safety," McCaskey said. "We want to prolong careers. We want our guys to be available on a week-to-week basis. The evaluation is ongoing. Every year we take a look at it. Our considered opinion is that right now the best surface for our team, primarily considering player safety, is a natural grass field."

Although SMG's top manager at Soldier Field quickly declared himself responsible for letting the sod dry too long before Friday's festivities, Serra said the sod had a higher clay content than they've seen before. That caused it to develop cracks that could have tripped up and injured the players, he said.

The sod came from Central Sod Farms of Marengo, and SMG is evaluating whether it makes sense to look for another company that might be able to provide a product that can better withstand the lakefront's weather extremes, Serra added.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel asked the Park District to find a way to make sure there's not a repeat of last Friday's sod incident, a spokeswoman said, but he doesn't want the solution to increase costs covered by the taxpayers.

Players are split on what type of surface they would prefer. Brian Urlacher has clamored for FieldTurf, but many players are happier playing on grass. If the field was better maintained, it wouldn't be a hot-button topic.

The park district would tear up the field to install an artificial surface faster than former Mayor Richard Daley ripped up runways at Meigs Field. But the Bears have the right to choose the surface, even though the Park District foots the bill. An artificial surface would be far more cost-effective.

McCaskey pledged the team would take a more hands-on role in supervising the facility, calling for a "collaborative effort." Asked if the Park District violated the team's lease, he joked that he's a recovering attorney.

"At this point, we're not concerned about the legalities," McCaskey said. "We're concerned about making sure we have the best possible playing surface for our players."

Tribune reporter Hal Dardick contributed to this story.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on August 10, 2011, 07:44:55 pm
‘’Johnny’s very, very talented. He’s very young and he’s still learning how to play,’’ Martz said. ‘’Guys like Johnny just need to learn to be consistent. Consistency in his play, and that’s with players at every position but particularly at that ‘X’ position. He certainly has the ability. He just is still learning to play, adjust and do the things we ask him to do.’’

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/6993915-606/martz-lauds-kellen-davis-says-offense-ready-for-quantum-leap.html
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 10, 2011, 07:51:06 pm
 Be nice if we could scrimmage N.E. instead of Buffalo every year. Oh well.

 Seeing Garza at center when signing Chris Spencer is like ...

 Whoa what a minute here man ... we signed him and dont want to see him broken in pre - season.

 We'll park his ass.

 The OL may be the most exciting thing about OUR BEARRSSE in pre - season along with the secondary.

 AS usual the OL is an ongoing experiment but this time it has under meanings ...

 who can do the best to see WR's get open?

 It is afterall a TEAM effort. Martz and Tice have to share responsibilitys here.

 And yes I hate to say it ... but it IS all about G.B.  >:(

 This isnt about knocking off the Cardinals ...

 this is about knocking off the Superbowl Champions.

 We have to get it done. Dont expect any help from Deeeetroit or Minny.

 This BEARS SHIP sails with us alone on the high seas.  :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 10, 2011, 08:42:32 pm
‘’Johnny’s very, very talented. He’s very young and he’s still learning how to play,’’ Martz said. ‘’Guys like Johnny just need to learn to be consistent. Consistency in his play, and that’s with players at every position but particularly at that ‘X’ position. He certainly has the ability. He just is still learning to play, adjust and do the things we ask him to do.’’

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/6993915-606/martz-lauds-kellen-davis-says-offense-ready-for-quantum-leap.html

Martz is losing it.  Williams BETTER be the real deal or good bye Martz.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 10, 2011, 08:47:59 pm
Martz is losing it.  Williams BETTER be the real deal or good bye Martz.

 Ehhh ... One game away from a Superbowl.

 I'd try to have more confidence.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 11, 2011, 05:39:50 am
If the O doesn't do well, it most likely will be the end of Martz no matter. I doubt Lovie would be far behind.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 11, 2011, 08:14:57 am
Is Marrz losing it? Could be. They better get Knox's head on straight. He has too much talent to sit in favor of Roy Williams. Roy Williams is no Mr. Perfect.


Martz says Knox not ready for starting job
Bears offensive coordinator urges wide receiver to work to earn playing time

By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
12:21 a.m. CDT, August 11, 2011
BOURBONNAIS — Johnny Knox is confident when the preseason ends he will be back in the starting lineup for the Bears, but offensive coordinator Mike Martz says the speedster isn't ready.

The demotion of Knox behind newcomer Roy Williams creates an interesting situation. By no means does it remove Knox — who played on 88.2 percent of the snaps in 2010 — from the offense entirely. But it dramatically reduces his role at wide receiver.

If he can't displace Williams for the Sept. 11 opener against the Falcons, there's a better than fair chance he will push for a new home, according to a source.

This is a guy, after all, who thought he would be talking contract extension before the end of the season and now has to surpass a competitor coming off three mediocre seasons with the Cowboys.

"He just has to get better. He has to play better," Martz told the Tribune on Wednesday. "That's all. It's just like when Johnny came in, Earl (Bennett) was the starter. We pushed Earl aside for Johnny because of the speed. We kind of gave that job to Johnny. That wasn't really earned. And once you get in this league, you should earn.

"He just was not ready, not because he can't do it or he's not talented. The preparation, the consistency that's required … he does a lot of good things, but they have to be good all the time. That's what Roy is.

"You just don't get there in a year. Not at the 'X' (primary) receiver. That's the position. Not only does he have to prepare better. Just with everything, he has to be a perfectionist. And young players feel like it's given to them, when it's not. So he's learning that, just like everybody else."

Perhaps it's no coincidence NFL Network analyst Marshall Faulk criticized Knox shortly after last season, making you wonder if he was talking to his former coach with the Rams.

Maybe the Bears are trying to light a fire under Knox. That would be a best-case scenario for him, because to hear Martz tell it, the fifth-round pick from 2009 was thrust into a role because the team had no one else.

General manager Jerry Angelo told Knox at the start of camp he was expecting big things from him. Knox had 960 receiving yards last season, 40 shy of becoming the team's first receiver since Marty Booker in 2002 to have 1,000.

Knox, who got stronger in his upper body, has been slowed by a minor back injury but is back in the mix.

He was the big-play target for quarterback Jay Cutler last season when he averaged 18.8 yards per catch, fifth in the NFL. One-third of his catches went for 20 yards or more and you have to wonder if Williams, who played well for Martz on the Lions, can be that threat downfield.

"He made some really good plays, and he's going to be a heck of a player in the league," Martz said of Knox. "But there's a process that he has to go through yet."

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pistol on August 11, 2011, 08:59:39 pm
I like seeing the positive reports on our o-line but I'm still a little skeptical. I hope it works out as it will be a long seasoon without better o_line play. But usually when you have a handful of crap cards, you can shuffle them around anyway you want but they'll still be crap cards...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 11, 2011, 09:02:32 pm
Bears' Knox says he's not seeking trade

By Vaughn McClure
 
Tribune reporter
 
1:18 p.m. CDT, August 11, 2011
BOURBONNAIS -- Chicago Bears receiver Johnny Knox, who was demoted in favor of newcomer Roy Williams, said Thursday he has no plans to seek a trade.

"I’m a Bear, and I want to stay a Bear for life," Knox said.

Knox wasn’t surprised about such speculation after Williams replaced him as the "X" receiver in offensive coordinator Mike Martz’s scheme. He admitted being frustrated by the decision but vowed to work hard to regain his starting role.

"I could see where people were coming from, but it was basically people trying to stir something up," Knox said of the trade talk.

Last season, Knox led the Bears with 960 receiving yards and tied for the team lead with five touchdown receptions while averaging 18.8 yards per catch.

Both Martz and receivers coach Darryl Drake said Knox needs to work on his overall game in order to regain his job. But Drake also noted that even if Knox doesn't start, he'll still be an integral part of the offense.

Drake later berated reporters in response to the Tribune's report about Knox possibly seeking a trade if he were demoted.

"Johnny Knox never said one word (about a trade)," Drake said. "Nothing ever came out of his mouth. Johnny Knox texted me this morning wondering where this (bleep) comes from. I'm going to tell you right now, if you guys keep making this stuff up and bringing this stuff up, you're going to deal with me. That ain't going to be real nice. That ain't going to be real positive.

"Johnny Knox is trying to do everything he needs to do. He don't need all this. He's trying to be the best he can possibly be. If Johnny Knox would have said that, fine, he'd have to deal with it. But when he doesn't, I'm going to have to get involved with it. It's as simple as that."

vxmcclure@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 11, 2011, 09:16:48 pm
I liked this article by one of my all time favorite Bears

Butkus tackles Soldier Field turf, HGH testing
     
By Fred Mitchell
 
Tribune reporter
 
4:26 p.m. CDT, August 11, 2011
Dick Butkus is renowned for being one of the most violent and aggressive players in NFL history. Yet the former Bears Hall of Fame middle linebacker is a prominent advocate for health and safety on and off the football field.

Butkus weighed in on a variety of provocative topics Thursday during an interview with the Tribune, including the new NFL game-day random tests for illegal supplements, the balky turf issues at Soldier Field and the recent death of fellow NFL star and acting colleague Bubba Smith.

As a first-round draft pick out of Illinois, Butkus began his pro career in 1965, when the Bears played at Wrigley Field. Then came the move to Soldier Field.

“In 1971 we moved in there and they had AstroTurf down there, which was like playing on concrete,” Butkus said via phone from Los Angeles. “It wasn’t as advanced as it is today.”

Butkus remains incredulous about the ongoing problems with the Soldier Field natural grass, which caused last Friday night’s practice to be cancelled.

“I don’t know if it is the moisture or what, but why don’t they get that guy (George Toma) from Kansas City, and get someone in there and grow grass the right way,” said Butkus.  “I was talking to somebody at the Hall of Fame (in Canton, Ohio last weekend) and he said he was on the field (last Friday) and he couldn’t believe how bad it was.

“To me, you’re a pro. You should be able to play on a parking lot or in a prairie somewhere. But of course nowadays everybody has to have it picture-perfect. And I just don’t understand why either the (Chicago) Park District or the Bears can’t seem to find someone who knows how to grow grass. Geez … I think it’s ridiculous. At this stage of time, that a stadium has trouble with turf … come on now. What’s with that?

“I liked (playing on) the grass. It gives a little bit and I think it’s much safer. Over the course of time and the pounding … if you have an injury, it just seems like AstroTurf just compounds it all the more. That’s just my personal experience with it. We played in Houston (at the AstroDome) and that was like playing on concrete. I thought it was great, but I was healthy then. But as soon as I had knee problems, it was torture.”

Butkus was in Los Angeles with EAS Sports Nutrition to talk about safe, clean sports supplements and the EAS 100 percent certification. His organization, “I Play Clean,” has partnered with EAS Sports Nutrition to raise awareness among athletes.

Regarding the NFL’s recent decision to randomly test players throughout the season, Butkus said: “I think it’s good. Steroids …  I guess they are able to mix them now. HGH, there is so much more that we have found out about it and that it causes cancer. And there are some who speculate that it actually lowers your strength instead of raising your strength. So I think it is a good move by the NFL. I think they are doing these guys a favor by helping them out with their health. We are trying to nip that in the bud with high schoolers.”

Butkus and Smith were pioneers when it came to athletes appearing in beer commercials on television. Smith died Aug. 3 in Los Angeles at the age of 66.

“We had 14 years with Miller (Lite Beer) and another three or four working on some (TV) series work. We got to know each other and spend a lot of time together,” Butkus said. “When you work on a series, you are with someone for a long time. I’ve got to tell you, I was shocked about (Smith’s death).  Just a week or so before, someone brought up his name about something we had done. But we had so much fun doing those Miller spots. That led to me actually coming out here (to Hollywood) and getting into acting a little bit.”

Butkus said he was planning to attend Smith’s funeral Thursday afternoon.

“We had some scripts that we worked on that were that close to getting made (into movies or TV series). We had a good run at it,” said Butkus, who appeared with Smith in the TV series “Blue Thunder.”

“We were able to be on a number of series and we had a good thing going. We worked very well together. I knew of him playing-wise, but never had that much contact until the commercials brought us together. We both were not afraid to be the fall guy and let the other guy have the punch line. It didn’t bother us at all. I just thought he had the looks and I could react off of that.”

fmitchell@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 11, 2011, 11:57:36 pm

 The one I heard about Butkus was when Mean Joe Green came off of a play and spit on Butkus.

 Butkus didnt react ... thats when observers knew Butkus' days were over.

 Can anyone verify this?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 12, 2011, 07:19:52 am
NFL network will show the Buffalo/CHI game on Sunday at  6:00 CT/7:00 ET (http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/networkschedule?selectedDate=08/14/2011&field=selectedDate).

And in case you do a double take on the mustache roaming the Buffalo sidelines, yes that is Wanny (http://www.buffalobills.com/team/coaches/index.html) the new inside LB coach for the Bills.  Apparently they feel the need to employ 2 coaches for their LBs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on August 12, 2011, 08:56:52 am
Another year and my stupid cable company still doesn't have NFL network.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 12, 2011, 09:01:59 am
Soldier Field grass has been unstable for long time
Bears need to switch to consistent surface to bolster style of play
   
Matt Bowen
 
Scouting the Bears
 
11:19 p.m. CDT, August 11, 2011
Three pairs of cleats. A speed bottom, a baseball style cleat and the old school seven-studs. That's what I packed in my bag for trips to Soldier Field to play the Bears during my NFL career.

Take the first bus to the stadium, get out early for warmups and test the field. When you play in Chicago — at any point during the season — the grass is suspect.

Even in September, players slip and clumps of grass erupt from the field when you come out of your breaks. In late November, early December? The worst surface you will find in the NFL.

And I always went with the seven-studs (complete with 5/8 inch screw-ins) just to give me a chance to stay on my feet.

If there is one-thing players will tell you in this league, it is it all comes down to footwork. You have to trust your ability to plant and drive as a defender, run through your cuts as a wide receiver and step into your throws as a quarterback.

However, when doubt creeps into your mind before kickoff, and you have to adjust the way you play because of the grass, it doesn't meet NFL standards.

Bears linebacker Brian Urlacher has been vocal with his opinions of Soldier Field and if you are listening from his perspective, it points directly at the makeup of this football team.

Lovie Smith is a Cover-2 coach. A defense that relies on speed, change of direction and players that drive downhill to the football. Read the quarterback and pursue to the football.

Move over to the offense and Mike Martz. The route schemes the Bears run are specific to depth, speed and the ability of players such as Devin Hester to get in and out of their cuts. When a receiver slips, or is even slow coming back to the ball, the entire play is a wash for quarterback Jay Cutler.

Would FieldTurf improve the product we see on the field in Chicago? Without a doubt.

FieldTurf isn't the best alternative to natural grass. I will admit that. You will experience more soreness in your hips and knees on Monday mornings because we are still talking about artificial turf.

But the grass the Bears are playing on doesn't rival most suburban Chicago high school fields on Friday nights. That's a problem.

And for all of the talk "on player safety," I've seen plenty of guys go down with bad injuries when the grass came up from under their feet.

The solution? Make the change to FieldTurf, rip up the grass before it is dead at mid-season, and put the Bears in the best position to win.

After playing at Glenbard West and Iowa, Matt Bowen spent seven seasons in the NFL as a strong safety with the Rams, Packers, Redskins and Bills, including playing for Lovie Smith and Mike Martz in St. Louis. When he's not writing for the Tribune, you can find his work at nationalfootballpost.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on August 12, 2011, 10:23:54 am


“I don’t know if it is the moisture or what, but why don’t they get that guy (George Toma) from Kansas City, and get someone in there and grow grass the right way,” said Butkus.  “I was talking to somebody at the Hall of Fame (in Canton, Ohio last weekend) and he said he was on the field (last Friday) and he couldn’t believe how bad it was.

Maybe he doesn't belong to a union.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 12, 2011, 11:26:35 am
Ok, what the heck has happened to Yapper?  Havent seen him in a while....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AZSteve on August 12, 2011, 12:23:11 pm
JJ heard the same story about Green/Butkus years ago then last year sometime I was watching either ESPN or NFL network and I think it was a program about football's toughest,meanest,etc.,etc., and whoever was doing the commentary (an ex-Steeler I believe) related the same story.That's all I can remember...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 12, 2011, 12:26:35 pm
Ehhh ... One game away from a Superbowl.

 I'd try to have more confidence.

Uh, what does that have to do with the WR position this year?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 12, 2011, 12:43:19 pm
Chris Conte confident despite crash course with Bears

BY MARK POTASH mpotash@suntimes.com August 10, 2011 10:48PM

BOURBONNAIS, Ill. — Destiny brought the Bears to FieldTurf on Wednesday night.

A power failure knocked out the lights about 75 minutes into practice at Olivet Nazarene University. After waiting 40 minutes for ComEd to solve the problem, they took buses and golf carts to nearby Bradley-Bourbonnais High School, where they concluded practice on the school’s pristine FieldTurf surface.

‘‘It’s nice,’’ quarterback Jay Cutler said. ‘‘It’s something we could get used to.’’

Bears coach Lovie Smith didn’t seem to mind — the interruption or the FieldTurf.

‘‘Every once in a while things like this happen,’’ Smith said. ‘‘But the players came over, got a chance to work on FieldTurf. It was a good, lively practice. We got better tonight. That’s what we wanted to do.’’

It was the third time in the last six days that the Bears’ practice routine was altered. Last Friday, they moved from Soldier Field to Olivet Nazarene because of poor field conditions. On Monday, practice was cut short because of a storm.

‘‘It’s not all bad,’’ Smith said. ‘‘You want to put guys in different situations. As I said earlier, we’re going to London. We’ll have to get out of the routine. But eventually it’s good to go through that and then to see that we got a normal-sized field and we’re able to get the same work that we would have gotten in over there.’’

Zero-sum game

It was a great night for the second-team defense, which had five interceptions — two by safety Craig Steltz and one each by rookie safeties Anthony Walters and Winston Venable and cornerback Corey Graham. Another rookie safety, third-round draft pick Chris Conte, dropped a sure pick off a deflection.

But it wasn’t such a great night for backup quarterback Caleb Hanie, who threw all five interceptions.

‘‘Great night for the Bears — that’s the only way you can look at it,’’ Smith said. ‘‘We do have a good defense. But offensively, we have to protect the ball.’’

Hurd hurt

Wide receiver Sam Hurd, who has been making an impact in an attempt to be more than a special-teams player, suffered an ankle injury at Bradley-Bourbonnais but was back on his feet after getting it iced.

‘‘He should be good to go,’’ Smith said.

Defensive tackle Anthony Adams, who had a boot on his left leg, missed a third day of practice with a calf injury. He wasn’t concerned it would keep him out for long.

Initial depth chart

There were no big surprises when the Bears ­released their first ‘‘unofficial’’ depth chart. At wide receiver, Roy Williams is ahead of Johnny Knox, and Devin Hester is ahead of Earl Bennett.

‘‘Guys like Johnny just need to learn to be consistent,’’ offensive coordinator Mike Martz said. ‘‘He certainly has the ability. He just is still learning to play, adjust and do the things we ask him to do.”

Right tackle Gabe Carimi is the only rookie starter. Four rookies are second-team: free safety Conte (behind Major Wright), right tackle Josh Davis (behind Carimi), strong-side linebacker J.T. Thomas (behind Nick Roach) and middle linebacker Dom DeCicco (behind Brian Urlacher). Davis and DeCicco are undrafted.

Dane update

Wide receiver Dane Sanzenbacher, an undrafted rookie from Ohio State who has been taking first-team reps in practice, is No. 3 behind Williams and Knox. But he’s also pushing Bennett for playing time in the slot.

“We’re very pleased with his progress,’’ Martz said. ‘‘With the things we continue to add, he’s [made] very few mistakes. He’s got a chance.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 12, 2011, 12:55:28 pm
Bears providing more protection for Jay Cutler
 
BY SEAN JENSEN sjensen@suntimes.com August 10, 2011 10:48PM

BOURBONNAIS, Ill. — Bears quarterback Jay Cutler didn’t finish the 2010 season, leaving the NFC Championship Game with a Grade II tear of the medial collateral ligament in his left knee early in the third quarter.

But it’s a wonder he lasted that long.

Cutler was sacked or knocked down 79 times, tops in the league according to Pro Football Focus, and he can’t be expected to endure that much duress again in 2011.

“It takes its toll on guys,” Bears offensive coordinator Mike Martz said. “I’ve seen that before with quarterbacks.”

Like a movie on a loop.

In 11 seasons in which he either has been the offensive coordinator or head coach, a Martz-led offense has ranked in the top 10 for most quarterback knockdowns nine times, according to STATS. Cutler, though, has the distinction of being Martz’s only quarterback to lead the league in that category.

“On the offensive line, your job is to protect the quarterback,” Bears center Roberto Garza said. “We have to get better at that, we have to get better at running the football, we have to get better at everything.”

The Bears still are installing basics of Martz’s offense, but there are indications that they will do more to protect Cutler this year.

The Bears’ offense finished 30th in the league in yards last season, but the unit was markedly better late in the year, except against the Green Bay Packers.

With changes to the offensive line, Martz said the focus was solely on winning.

“We had to play ‘Star Wars’ last year,” Martz said. “Then kind of mirrors and smoke and stuff. But once we got squared off on the offensive line, then we got to playing football again.”

The Bears averaged nearly 38 points in their last three victories, against the Seattle Seahawks, New York Jets and Minnesota Vikings, and Martz expects to build on that momentum.

“We feel like we should be able to continue to improve from where we left off and make a quantum leap in some other areas,” Martz said. “With the number of receivers we have and the quality there, I would think we’d be much better there.”

While they’ve been dogged for not doing enough, the Bears believe they’ve upgraded their pass protection with first-round draft pick Gabe Carimi and free-agent tight end Matt Spaeth. And while starting tight end Kellen ­Davis isn’t new, he’ll be an upgrade as a blocker over Greg Olsen.

“That’s going to help,” ­Martz said of the tweaks. “We’ve also got another runner, so we can take some of that pressure off of [Cutler].”

That runner is Marion Barber, who has a reputation for churning out tough yards.

The Bears also added veteran center Chris Spencer, who still could find his way into the starting lineup if one of the other interior linemen falters. Left guard Chris Williams has looked the shakiest, but he has been holding his ground better.

Recently, Bears offensive line coach Mike Tice got snappy when asked about his unit’s view on curbing the league-high 52 sacks Cutler endured last season.

“When we looked at the whole season and we evaluated who belonged to what hits and what sacks, they weren’t 100 percent to the line,” Tice said. “That’s all I’m going to say.”

With his voluminous playbook, Martz has number of plays to ease Cutler’s burden. But the most obvious will be the use of Spaeth and Davis in two-tight-end formations. The Bears are confident that both are more reliable blockers than Olsen and Brandon Manumaleuna, yet they also are effective receivers.

One of the more effective plays in training camp has been a “hot route” to Davis, a play in which, with the threat of a heavy pass rush, Cutler drops back quickly and darts the ball to the tight end in stride, barely off the line of scrimmage.

“Kellen has stepped to the forefront and established himself not just as a blocker, but also a pretty dynamic receiver in practice,” Martz said. “There are some things coming out of this that you get pretty excited about.”

As for Cutler, he said his command of the offense is “night and day.”

“I feel more comfortable with the reads and where I’m going with the ball,” he said. “It’s just a matter of getting the offense line worked out and giving me and the receivers time.”

Later, though, he concluded the thought by adding of the offensive line, “Those guys, I think, they might surprise some people.”

He certainly is counting on it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 12, 2011, 04:23:29 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-obama-hosts-packers-lobbies-for-rodgers-trade-to-bears-20110812,0,3983656.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 12, 2011, 04:33:56 pm
What an idiot!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Fearless Freep on August 12, 2011, 09:23:03 pm
While at the CFL game last night between the Montreal Alouettes and the Edmonton Eskimos, they made a reference on the (mini) Jumbotron to an exhibition game played in Montreal in 1961 between the Bears and the Alouettes (= french for Lark, the bird).  Never knew. I went today and found a website with history of the games as well as other CFL-NFL exhibitions games.

Chicago Bears 34  (http://www.mmbolding.com/BSR/CFL-NFL_Chicago_Bears_vs_Montreal_Alouettes_1961.htm)
- (http://www.mmbolding.com/BSR/CFL-NFL_Chicago_Bears_vs_Montreal_Alouettes_1961.htm)Montreal Alouettes 16 Aug.5, 1961 (http://www.mmbolding.com/BSR/CFL-NFL_Chicago_Bears_vs_Montreal_Alouettes_1961.htm)

CFL VS NFL (http://www.mmbolding.com/BSR/Candian_Football_League_vs_National_Football_League.htm)
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 12, 2011, 09:49:46 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DED9xeyPri8&feature=player_embedded

Gruden giving our guy Sanzenbacher some love.  Also pissing off the QB he is interviewing in the process.  The sound is real low so turn everything up to hear it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 12, 2011, 11:49:32 pm
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1189171/index.htm

A nice read about Cutler.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on August 13, 2011, 04:47:56 am
anyone have a link for a live online broadcast of the game tonight?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 13, 2011, 05:56:28 am
I just plan on watching the game Sunday night when it is rebroadcasted on NFL Network at 6CT.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on August 13, 2011, 06:44:26 pm
Wow.  I didn't know channelsurfing.net was seized by the government.  They arrested the owner too.

Guess I gotta find an alternate like justin.tv
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 06:46:09 pm
I will see the game but if it is like last year it will not be in HD.  Oh the humanity!

I will have to see wait and see it in HD on the NFL replay.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on August 13, 2011, 07:01:17 pm
http://www.vodkasports.tv/Buffalo+Bills++Chicago+Bears-832.htm

If anyone wants to watch it is just now starting
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 07:18:27 pm
Lance Louis still sucks.  Cutler sacked by his guy. This O-line looks just as bad as last years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 07:34:12 pm
Hanie gives up two sacks in a row.   The O-line was not great but he has to get rid of the ball quicker.

I am not panicking yet but the O-line has to improve.  The Bears tend to work on stuff in preseason instead of putting their guys in the best situation.

So far the only Lineman that has really sucked is Lance Louis.  If he can't get his act together they will have to move Garza to RG and hope Spencer can get it done at center.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 07:45:01 pm
Those of you not watching this game are going LOVE seeing Barber run in a Bears uniform!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 07:47:46 pm
Barber gets them there.  Hanie runs it in from the 5 yard line. 

7-3 Bears.  The Bears line needs work on pass protection but they were blowing guys up run blocking that drive.  Barber was often 5-8 yards down field before being touched.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on August 13, 2011, 08:07:35 pm
Was that Hanie in there for the second series?

This stream is very choppy and I didn't notice who the QB was.  Just assumed Cutler would get the first two series.

Anyway 6 plays and 3 sacks for the offense wasn't it?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 08:09:32 pm
Cutler played one series.  I think it spooked the coaches when he got sacked.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 08:12:30 pm
Lance Luois gave up the sack on Cutler.  However Cutler was running for his life on a few also.

The two right in a row on Hanie were more coverage sacks.  He had sufficient time but held onto the ball to long.  The line needs to get better at pasas blocking period.  It is the first pre-season game so I am not going to panic.  If they look like this in game three I will hit the panic button.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 08:15:57 pm
Barber doing a hell of a job in pass protection.  I am liking that pick up more by the minute.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Eastcoastfan on August 13, 2011, 08:17:19 pm
Erik Kramer heaping praise on the Bears offense.  Is he watching the same game I am?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 08:32:42 pm
The line did a very good job run blocking.  They still suck at pass blocking.  Hanie did not play very well.  Cutler made some plays but did not have a lot of time.  All in all nothing to freak out about yet.

The first pre-season game the defense is always way ahead of the offense.  Even more so this year with no off-season and the Bears shuffling their O-line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 08:34:05 pm
The Bears line was blowing up the Bills D-line when Barber was in there.  That is most definately something to build on.  The starters for both teams were still in the game at that point.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 08:48:20 pm
If you thought the first team O-line sucked you should see the second team. Uggg.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 13, 2011, 08:52:37 pm

 Keep the updates coming ! I wonder if this game is on NFL.com? Lemme check.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 09:03:27 pm
It is 7-3 Bears 4 minutes in the 3rd.  Mostly scrubs in for both teams now.

The Bears D and special teams looked real good the offense was good running the ball but terrible protecting the passer.  Very few flags in the first half tons of flags now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 09:08:07 pm
So far the Bears have suffered injuries to Bennet, Wooton, Marcus Harrison and Bowman.  I am not sure how serious any of them are. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 13, 2011, 10:02:24 pm
Bears beat Bills 10-3

Fred Mitchell/Tribune reporter
August 13, 2011,  9:51 p.m. CDT


Robbie Gould added a 45-yard field goal with 5:52 left in the fourth period to increase the Bears' lead to 10-3. Gould missed a 33-yard field goal try with 1:41 left.

A crowd of 46,073 attended Saturday night's game.

The Bears maintained their 7-3 lead after three quarters. A pass by rookie quarterback Nathan Enderle was intercepted at the Buffalo 5-yard line late in the third quarter to thwart a Bears drive.

Bears coach Lovie Smith explained why he stuck with his starting offensive line throughout the first half.

"We wanted to play the offensive line the entire half just to get them some work playing together," he said.

"We were able to get that done. I liked the stuff we did on the scoring drive…Caleb Hanie's run… we did a lot of good things, running and passing. Marion Barber, great job running the football. We're pleased but we've got a long way to go."

Cutler said his brief stint was beneficial.

"It felt good. Obviously the lockout was long. For us to get out here and go against a different team, it was good for everybody," he said.

"You can take a lot, especially those second-team guys and guys who haven't had a lot of experience. It was also good for the line to go out there and see some different fronts and go against some different guys. We have to go back and look at the film and see what we did good, see what we did bad and learn from it."

While the new NFL kickoff rule says teams will now kick off from their own 35-yard line instead of the 30, the Bears' Robbie Gould opened the game by kicking from the 30. His kickoff sailed to the 3, where Buffalo's Marcus Easley returned it to the 27.

On the kickoff, Bears defensive end Corey Wooton suffered a knee injury and was ruled out for the rest of the game. Bears defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli has high expectations for Wooton this season in his second year out of Northwestern.

Buffalo took a 3-0 lead with 2 minutes left in the first period when Rian Lindell connected on a 44-yard field goal at the end of a drive.

Johnny Knox returned the ensuing kickoff 70 yards to the Bills' 29. With Caleb Hanie taking over at quarterback for starter Jay Cutler, the Bears' offense sputtered. He was sacked twice, moving the line of scrimmage back to the 37. On fourth down, Adam Podlesh pooched a 22-yard punt to the Bills' 15 as the first period ended.

Cutler completed his only pass attempt for zero yards. He was sacked once for six yards.

The Bears took a 7-3 lead at 8:07 of the second period when Hanie ran 4 yards for a TD. Gould booted the extra point at the end of the 9-play, 52-yard drive.

Bears defensive lineman Marcus Harrison had to be attended by medical personnel late in the second period before being listed as questionable for the remainder of the game with a shoulder injury.

At the half, the Bears had 14 yards passing and 78 total yards. Gould missed a 56-yard field goal attempt wide right in the final seconds of the half. Buffalo had 104 total yards: 48 passing and 56 rushing.

Bears defensive lineman Amobi Okoye had two sacks in the first half, matching the pair by the Bills' Shawne Merriman.

"It felt good. A little different not being in a Detroit Lions uniform on the other side, but it feels like home. It feels good," he said.

Before the game, the Bears announced that defensive tackle Anthony Adams, who is expected to miss a couple weeks with a left calf muscle injury, and linebackers J.T. Thomas (hip) and Chris Johnson (leg) would not be available for the game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 13, 2011, 10:05:13 pm
Final 10-3 Bears. Finally got to see Harvey Unga. He is a load for sure. Levi Horn is a big dude. Bell looked good running and catching the ball in the 2nd half. Bears looked very vanilla. 1st team Oline played the entire 1st half.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 13, 2011, 10:11:50 pm
They played the entire first half and never did get better at pass blocking.  They sure as hell can run block though!

Barber was running well and picking up his blocking assignments.  Taylor did not do much but perhaps will show something next game.

The Bears D line is going to be flat out nasty!  They have a lot of good players and a lot of depth there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 13, 2011, 10:14:18 pm
They played the entire first half and never did get better at pass blocking.  They sure as hell can run block though!

Barber was running well and picking up his blocking assignments.  Taylor did not do much but perhaps will show something next game.

The Bears D line is going to be flat out nasty!  They have a lot of good players and a lot of depth there.

I thought so too and making cuts will be difficult.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 13, 2011, 10:15:35 pm
Forte's cameo appearance doesn't last long

Running back in for 3 snaps before calling it a night


Vaughn McClure/Chicago Tribune
August 13, 2011, 9:40 p.m. CDT


At least Matt Forte got his cleats dirty.

The Bears running back, who is seeking a five-year contract extension, considered not playing in Saturday's exhibition against the Bills because of the injury risk on the often-shoddy Soldier Field surface. But Forte suited up and played a total of three snaps before exiting. His only real action involved catching a shovel pass from Jay Cutler for no gain.

Forte considered not reporting to training camp without a new contract. Bears general manager Jerry Angelo assured the running back a new deal would come in time, so Forte deciding against holding out.

Forte is scheduled to make a base salary of $550,000 this season. With the arrival of Marion Barber at $2.5 million, it only increased the urgency to get Forte's deal done.

Power game:  Speaking of Barber, the veteran running back displayed the type of power running that had fans applauding his every move in Bourbonnais.

Barber had seven carries for a game-high 45 yards in the first half of Saturday's game. His runs included a 12-yard burst during which he slapped away a couple of defenders.

The Bears, who struggled on third-and-1 and goal-line situations last season, are counting on him to be their short-yardage back.

Barber also was held by a Bills defender at the end of the first half, drawing a penalty that kept a drive alive and allowed Robbie Gould to attempt a 56-yard field goal. Gould missed.

Tough start:  Defensive end Corey Wootton, one of the players the Bears were counting on in the defensive rotation, injured his knee playing special teams on the opening kickoff. It's unclear how Wootton suffered the injury, but it knocked him out for the remainder of the game.

Wootton, a second-year player from Northwestern, drew praise from defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli for reporting to camp in tremendous shape.

Wootton earned recognition during his rookie season for sacking Brett Favre and knocking Favre out of the game.

Extra points:  Cornerback Zack Bowman exited the game in the third quarter with a head injury. ...

Defensive tackle Amobi Okoye, signed by the Bears after being released by the Texans, had two first-half sacks wearing Tommie Harris' old No. 91. …

Fellow newcomer Vernon Gholston forced a fumble on a kickoff that was recovered by Craig Steltz, but the play was nullified by a Bears penalty. …

Nose tackle Anthony Adams, who injured his calf, did not play Saturday and is expected to be sidelined another week. Linebackers J.T. Thomas and Chris Johnson also did not play. …

Defensive tackle Marcus Harrison banged his shoulder after a collision with Gholston. …

Adam Podlesh's first punt as a Bear went 42 yards.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 13, 2011, 10:24:51 pm
They played the entire first half and never did get better at pass blocking.  They sure as hell can run block though!

Barber was running well and picking up his blocking assignments.  Taylor did not do much but perhaps will show something next game.

The Bears D line is going to be flat out nasty!  They have a lot of good players and a lot of depth there.

 
I thought so too and making cuts will be difficult.

 
Forte's cameo appearance doesn't last long

Running back in for 3 snaps before calling it a night


Vaughn McClure/Chicago Tribune
August 13, 2011, 9:40 p.m. CDT


At least Matt Forte got his cleats dirty.

The Bears running back, who is seeking a five-year contract extension, considered not playing in Saturday's exhibition against the Bills because of the injury risk on the often-shoddy Soldier Field surface. But Forte suited up and played a total of three snaps before exiting. His only real action involved catching a shovel pass from Jay Cutler for no gain.

Forte considered not reporting to training camp without a new contract. Bears general manager Jerry Angelo assured the running back a new deal would come in time, so Forte deciding against holding out.

Forte is scheduled to make a base salary of $550,000 this season. With the arrival of Marion Barber at $2.5 million, it only increased the urgency to get Forte's deal done.

Power game:  Speaking of Barber, the veteran running back displayed the type of power running that had fans applauding his every move in Bourbonnais.

Barber had seven carries for a game-high 45 yards in the first half of Saturday's game. His runs included a 12-yard burst during which he slapped away a couple of defenders.

The Bears, who struggled on third-and-1 and goal-line situations last season, are counting on him to be their short-yardage back.

Barber also was held by a Bills defender at the end of the first half, drawing a penalty that kept a drive alive and allowed Robbie Gould to attempt a 56-yard field goal. Gould missed.

Tough start:  Defensive end Corey Wootton, one of the players the Bears were counting on in the defensive rotation, injured his knee playing special teams on the opening kickoff. It's unclear how Wootton suffered the injury, but it knocked him out for the remainder of the game.

Wootton, a second-year player from Northwestern, drew praise from defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli for reporting to camp in tremendous shape.

Wootton earned recognition during his rookie season for sacking Brett Favre and knocking Favre out of the game.

Extra points:  Cornerback Zack Bowman exited the game in the third quarter with a head injury. ...

Defensive tackle Amobi Okoye, signed by the Bears after being released by the Texans, had two first-half sacks wearing Tommie Harris' old No. 91. …

Fellow newcomer Vernon Gholston forced a fumble on a kickoff that was recovered by Craig Steltz, but the play was nullified by a Bears penalty. …

Nose tackle Anthony Adams, who injured his calf, did not play Saturday and is expected to be sidelined another week. Linebackers J.T. Thomas and Chris Johnson also did not play. …

Defensive tackle Marcus Harrison banged his shoulder after a collision with Gholston. …

Adam Podlesh's first punt as a Bear went 42 yards.

 Thank you GENTLEMEN !

 Just what I needed to hear ... BRING ON THE PACK! We owe them bastards.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 13, 2011, 10:30:07 pm
Bears' offense fails to impress in 10-3 victory
Line falters but defense looks fine in exhibition opener
   
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
10:13 p.m. CDT, August 13, 2011
It took the Bears just more than a week of training camp to name the starting offensive line.

We will see if one exhibition game is all it takes to send the coaching staff back to the drawing board.

There probably will not be a knee-jerk reaction after Saturday's 10-3 victory over the Bills at Soldier Field. To be clear, it wasn't a nine-sack, one-half meltdown like the trip to the Meadowlands last October. But it's apparent more work is needed as the line resembled the leaky unit that allowed an NFL-high 56 sacks a season ago.

The Bears return for one more week of training camp at Olivet Nazarene with practice resuming Monday, and there are eight days before they visit the Giants on Aug. 22. Maybe plans won't be re-drawn immediately, but it can't come as a complete surprise the unit struggled from the outset, allowing three sacks in the first two offensive possessions and four in a half of action.

"It was good for the line to see some different fronts and go against some different guys," quarterback Jay Cutler said. "We have to go back and look at the film and see what we did good, see what we did bad and learn from it."

The Bears knew they had to make significant improvement but the only additions were the selection of Gabe Carimi, a first-round draft pick, and the signing of Chris Spencer, at this point a well-paid backup interior lineman. The club made a hard run at the Steelers' Willie Colon but couldn't land him. Offensive line coach Mike Tice didn't have an offseason to work with the unit and left guard Chris Williams is the only player in the same position he ended last season.

New left tackle J'Marcus Webb, moved over from right tackle, was overwhelmed by Shawne Merriman, allowing one sack and a pressure that created a sack for Marcell Dareus on a play in which Webb was called for holding. Merriman, attempting to return to the form he had with the Chargers as one of the league's elite pass rushers, finished with two sacks.

On the first five combined dropbacks for Cutler, who played only one series, and backup Caleb Hanie, there were three sacks, and Cutler was flushed out of the pocket on a scramble. The starting line settled down, playing the entire first half as offensive coordinator Mike Martz said the team would seek rhythm. But the Bears had only 78 total yards at halftime and when they got rolling with help from some hard running by new back Marion Barber, the Bills starters were on the sideline. A fourth sack came just before halftime.

"I liked the stuff we did on the scoring drive," coach Lovie Smith said. "We're pleased but we have a long way to go."

Cutler played only six snaps, completing a screen pass to running back Matt Forte and handing off once to Devin Hester and twice to Chester Taylor. Forte did not have a rushing attempt, perhaps a compromise for a player concerned about his health during ongoing contract negotiations.

Barber looks like a fine addition as he carried seven times for 45 yards, going up the middle for 12 yards on a draw and making it around the left end for an 11-yard gain. Run blocking wasn't an issue for the line, and the Bears went ahead 7-3 early in the second quarter on Hanie's 4-yard run.

On defense, newcomer Amobi Okoye made an immediate impact with two sacks and fellow tackle Henry Melton made some plays early. Second-year safety Major Wright was also quite active. The Bears could be significantly better on the interior of the line this season now that they've moved past the Tommie Harris era.

"We need to get better," middle linebacker Brian Urlacher said. "That's all there is to it. We're a defensive team and we'll get better every week.

"After a long layoff it's fun to get back out there and play football again."

Third running back Kahlil Bell also ran hard with a 27-yard run in the fourth quarter, helping set up a 45-yard field goal by Robbie Gould with 5:52 remaining. Bell finished with 73 yards on 13 carries. Gould tacked on a 34-yard field goal.

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 14, 2011, 12:32:06 am
Damn, I really hope Wootton is okay.  According to the Suntimes (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/7057734-606/demoted-knox-makes-big-impact.html), he "was walking under his own power after the game."

Good to hear some positives on Melton and Okoye (against 2nd string, but still). 

If Barbarian still has any gas left and stays healthy, he will definitely be fun to watch.

I'll reserve judgement on the OL until game 3 as well.  Merriman would look pretty good in a Bears uniform though.  Said the same thing about Wimbley last year.  Coincidence?  Nah.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 14, 2011, 02:07:05 am
Damn, I really hope Wootton is okay.  According to the Suntimes (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/7057734-606/demoted-knox-makes-big-impact.html), he "was walking under his own power after the game."

Good to hear some positives on Melton and Okoye (against 2nd string, but still). 

If Barbarian still has any gas left and stays healthy, he will definitely be fun to watch.

I'll reserve judgement on the OL until game 3 as well.  Merriman would look pretty good in a Bears uniform though.  Said the same thing about Wimbley last year.  Coincidence?  Nah.

 At least this years crop got their cherries busted ... finally ... the next game should tell loads.

 Or sell loads if they are deadbeats.  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 14, 2011, 07:23:26 am
For those of you guys who are going to watch the replay on NFL Network take a good look at the sod chunks all over the field. At one point when we were going to attempt a FG, I even saw Mannely throwing a piece of sod out of the way so Gould could attempt the FG. It just goes to show you how rotten that field is. They need to get the Sod Father in there to fix it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on August 14, 2011, 08:37:23 am
I spent $20 and got the "preseason pass" from NFL.com.  My computer's video card has HDMI, out to my TV, anyway the quality was A+, full screen HD, never messed up.  All the games are on demand.  Totally worth it to me.

The regular season is $40, but those games arent available till the next day.  I might still get it and watch the games not available here locally in Indianapolis on monday.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on August 14, 2011, 09:04:01 am
Well I had a thought after reading about last nights game.  Taylor is officially out IMO.  Marion is adding a new dimension to the team and Bell is showing that he belongs.  Bell is a hell of a lot cheaper and plays ST.

Bears need to get active in looking for a 6th or 7th rounder for Taylor.  Hell even a backup G or CB.  Let's not wait till end of preseason where he will be cut.  He doesn't play ST and would anyone in their right mind choose him of Marion Barber as backup?  Let's also not forget he is older.  Time to see if we can move him for something...anything!

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 14, 2011, 09:17:24 am
Same with our excess DL talent. It seems more prudent to get something of value for a player rather than just cutting him and getting nothing in return.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 14, 2011, 09:33:35 am
O-line needs a lot of work
Revamped unit could be a glaring weakness well into the season
   
Dan Pompei
 
On the NFL
 
11:31 p.m. CDT, August 13, 2011

The sky was an impressive blend of colors and clouds over Soldier Field on Saturday night.

Unfortunately, Jay Cutler and Caleb Hanie spent too much time looking at it.

The Bears' new and purportedly improved offensive line played together for the entire first half.

Cutler was sacked once in three dropbacks, Hanie three times in 11 drops, including on his first two pass attempts.

Of course, pass protection was an issue for the Bears. It was an issue last year, a big issue, and the team hasn't had anywhere near enough time to improve.

The line has two new starters in Gabe Carimi and Lance Louis. Carimi, the team's first-round draft pick, not only was playing in his first NFL game, he was attending his first NFL game.

If you count old starters in new spots, the line has four new starters. Roberto Garza moves from right guard to center. J'Marcus Webb moves from right tackle to left.

The only starter in the same position he was in last year was Chris Williams, and the left guard may have been the least effective player on the line a year ago.

And there is no guarantee the line won't endure another shakeup before the season starts. Newly acquired Chris Spencer gets harder to ignore every time a Bears quarterback gets bruised.

Webb had some difficulty with a revived Shawne Merriman. He could have been speaking for all five starters when he said, "I have to get better and so does everyone else."

Louis acknowledged he has a lot of work to do, and admitted to making a couple of key mistakes. One of them resulted in a sack by Bills rookie Marcel Dareus.

"I was trying to put my head into it," he said. "It was bad technique. He swimmed me."

Garza not only is playing a new position, he also is responsible for calling out the fronts and protection adjustments at the line. That had been Olin Kreutz' job for the last 13 years.

What the Bears line needs at this point isn't Kreutz (that ship has sailed) or Willie Colon (they swung and missed at the Steelers lineman), or Bryant McKinnie (he's still out there but not a viable option).

What the Bears line needs is time.

The players need reps. They need tape sessions with coach Mike Tice. They need technique work on the side. They need to become more familiar with the protections. Each player needs to get a better feel for the player or players lined up next to him.

The issue is whether there is enough time. The Bears have four weeks, three exhibition games and about 16 practices to get their line in shape. That's it.

Because of the lockout, the Bears, and every other team, lost maybe 1,500 practice snaps. For a young, developing line, that's a major loss.

In the season opener Sept. 11, that line will be challenged by the Falcons' fine defensive end combination of John Abraham and Ray Edwards, who combined for 21 sacks last year.


Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 14, 2011, 09:44:48 am
The Bears game will be aired on NFLN at 6 PM tonight.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 14, 2011, 09:54:56 am
At least grass held firm in Bears opener

That's about all there is to glean from night at Soldier Field other than offensive line has long way to go


David Haugh/Chicago Tribune
August 14, 2011  3:52 a.m. CDT


Of all the people who proved something to Chicago during the Bears' 10-3 exhibition victory over the Bills, the man with the most at stake Saturday night never picked up a helmet.

His name is Tim LeFevour, the Soldier Field general manager who would have made Carlos Zambrano popular by comparison if the playing surface had embarrassed the Bears again. Just eight days after unsafe conditions forced the team to cancel a public practice for fans, it didn't. A serviceable field was the game's biggest star.

LeFevour, under pressure since Mayor Rahm Emanuel called out stadium management, responded with the Park District and the Bears producing a professional plot of grass the NFL's second-largest market deserves. The grass glistened and footing held.

Until everybody wises up and decides to install FieldTurf, city officials have an obligation to do their best with the natural grass the Bears organization prefers. For a night, they fulfilled it.

"I'm looking forward to November, December to see how it really is,'' said Bears receiver Roy Williams, who would be the only one. "But today it wasn't bad."

It looked better than that, in midseason form.

The same cannot be said for the Bears offensive line.

Or maybe it can. And that's the problem that continues to quell optimism.

Days before the first exhibition snap, offensive line coach Mike Tice anointed his five regular-season starters unless somebody falters. What if everybody falters?

Jay Cutler stuck around one series before presumably leaving to buy better insurance it appears he will need. On the Bears' first five quarterback drops, the line gave up three sacks and Cutler was forced to scramble for a 10-yard gain. I swear I didn't cut and paste that from a 2010 column.

"Too much pressure on the quarterback,'' coach Lovie Smith acknowledged. "We have to tighten that up a bit.''

It was only one half of one game, and remember few line coaches do more with less than Tice. A horrendous line didn't prevent the Bears from winning the division and playing in the NFC championship game.

Still, we expected to see more evidence the Bears had addressed their biggest weakness. Instead we saw evidence that suggested Cutler was a victim of assault and battery. This was no way to prove you won't miss Olin Kreutz.

The only other intriguing offensive development came courtesy of new running back Marion Barber. Barber ran with power and purpose. His seven carries for 45 yards provided Jerry Angelo just what he was looking for — on the field and perhaps in negotiations with Matt Forte.

For weeks, Forte has lobbied for a new contract that could turn into a major distraction if talks linger. It was annoying enough for Forte to threaten to sit out Saturday night without a deal — he played three snaps — but it threatens to get worse considering how far apart the sides seem. The offense needs Forte badly for Mike Martz's scheme to work best. But no urgency yet exists.

Before the game, Angelo told WBBM-AM 780: "We're eventually going to go to Matt and his representatives about a contract extension.''

Eventually?

The Bears do a nice job of locking up core players but their success doing so with Forte depends on how unrealistic his demands might be. It can't hurt Angelo's position to see good things from the guy he signed to back up Forte.

Angelo also saw good things from his defensive line, notably explosive tackles Henry Melton and Amobi Okoye. They stood out on a defense that gave the Bears something they have not experienced much this training camp: business as usual.

Besides the canceled practice at Soldier Field, the Bears shortened another workout in Bourbonnais because of lightning. The oddest occurrence came during special-teams drills Wednesday night at Olivet Nazarene when a Com Ed outage made it necessary to move to a nearby high school. Com Ed is having a tougher time producing consistent power this summer than Adam Dunn.

Angelo might say the football gods were playing dirty pool with his team.

But really it's too early to overreact to anything, even a familiarly porous offensive line that gave up nine sacks. On a night football finally made a welcome return to Chicago after months of waiting, the field held up. No starters got hurt. And nobody retired.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 14, 2011, 10:59:09 am
At least grass held firm in Bears opener

Well that maybe someones opinion but I dont believe it. If that were true then hows come players were throwing pieces of sod away to kick a FG? But maybe the writer of that article is a sod expert.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 14, 2011, 03:37:20 pm
I'm starting to wonder about Tice as well as Martz now. 

I mean Angelo drafted a LEFT TACKLE in Carimi (still love the pick) but Tice moved him to RIGHT TACKLE?

And then move the RIGHT TACKLE who play was steadily improving last season in J'marcus Webb and Tice moved him to LEFT TACKLE?

Then Angelo botched signing Kreutz but signed his replacement in Spencer but Tice has him on the depth chart as a SECOND STRINGER???

And the OLINE looked awful last night from what I've been reading too.   Tice has to be held accountable for the O-line this season for sure.

And as for Martz and our 30th ranked offense not looking good at all with regards to the passing game.  Got rid of Olsen and demoting our best WR in favor of a WR that hasn't done squat the last 2 seasons.   Nice going Martz.

I always liked the Barber signing and glad Angelo signed him.   I"d keep Taylor and let Bell walk myself.  Bell hasn't done anything since that big run about a couple seasons ago.  Especially if Forte decides to hold out if he doesn't get his contract demands met we'll at least have Taylor.

Just my opinions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: JeffH on August 14, 2011, 06:33:40 pm
The worst offensive line in NFL history.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 14, 2011, 07:05:47 pm
Jeff is an equal opportunity jerk.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: JeffH on August 14, 2011, 07:14:11 pm
Name one that was worse.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 14, 2011, 07:41:10 pm
Otto?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: JeffH on August 14, 2011, 08:01:28 pm
lol
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on August 14, 2011, 08:11:06 pm
Tice did pretty well last year with the crap he was provided. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now. I'm sure he wanted to see  what he had under game situations and will adjust accordingly. He didn't have the benefit of a lot of time with the new guys
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 14, 2011, 09:04:38 pm
While I wasn't super focused, I liked the play of Spencer and his athletism.  I think Louis ends up being the odd man out, they just won't hand the spot to Spencer...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 14, 2011, 09:06:05 pm
I mean, not like he is Logan Manklins!

Switching gears, wow what a beautiful night in middle Tennessee!  Took a jeep ride with my new wheels, sweet.  Like riding on rails
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 14, 2011, 09:22:00 pm
Wootton out at least 4 weeks (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-sources-bears-de-wootton-out-4-weeks-with-meniscus-damage-in-knee-20110814,0,816372.story) and will have arthroscopic knee surgery on Tuesday.  No ACL damage.  Gholston just got handed a golden opportunity to take advantage of if he's any good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 14, 2011, 09:42:07 pm
That sucks but he should be good to go for the regular season.  At least it was not worse.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 14, 2011, 11:02:02 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0815-pompei-film--20110815,0,6762783.column
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 15, 2011, 06:42:10 am
I hope Wooten doesn't end up being our next Dvorcek.  All the talent, none of the health...  Hard to blame the coaches for having him on special teams, Idonje was there for years before he got his opportunity.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on August 15, 2011, 07:10:00 am
Name one that was worse.


The 1986 Philadelphia Eagles, quarterbacked by Randall Cunningham, own the National Football League sack record with 104. Arizona (1997) is second with 78. Houston (2002) is third with 76.

I think Cunningham only got 72 of the 104...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on August 15, 2011, 07:19:16 am
The Bears were worst last year (56) but not the worst ever (104).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 07:21:01 am
We don't want to jump to conclusions after one half of play, but if the trends continue, we'll be wondering if the Bears don't have the wrong guy on the left side. J'Marcus Webb struggled at left tackle, giving up a sack and being flagged for a holding penalty that was declined.

Yup. I would agree. And if the assertions about Edwin Williams are true I'd be interested in seeing what he has as a starter at either center or OG. Somehow Lance Louis hasnt progressed sufficiently
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 07:24:08 am
The Bears were worst last year (56) but not the worst ever (104).

So we should be happy with 56? So getting sacked 56 times is acceptable? I dont think so.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 07:33:08 am
I liked what Spencer was doing as Center.  Of course he was going against the 2's and 3's.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 07:35:46 am
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0815-bears-okoye--20110815,0,1524506.story

If Okoye and Gholston can pressure the starters into becoming a better productive unit I will be happy. So far it seems like guys like Harrison and Toeiana are not looking like keepers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 07:38:30 am
Somebody needs to track down Yapper. He is missed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 15, 2011, 07:43:27 am
Don't think he said it was acceptable. He was pointing out they weren't the worst in history. I think we all agree, are O line needs work..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 07:49:13 am
I think our opening day line will be Spencer at center, Garza RG, Williams LG.  As good as Carimi looked and how Webb struggled I could see them possibly switching them two.  If they do they need to do it sooner rather then later.  Same with Spencer and moving Garza to RT where he has excelled.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 15, 2011, 07:50:21 am
Any changes to the line should be done right away, they need as much playing time at their respective position as possible..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 07:50:56 am
Pressure on Bears' offensive line to limit pressure on QB
Allowing 9 sacks in exhibition opener proves there's plenty of work to do
     
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
5:59 p.m. CDT, August 14, 2011
No one expected a masterpiece in the first game for the new-look Bears offensive line.

How could they? Needing to retool the unit, the Bears added a late first-round draft pick in Gabe Carimi and subtracted a captain and 13-year veteran in Olin Kreutz. Line coach Mike Tice reshuffled the rest of the pieces, and while the results Saturday night at Soldier Field against the Bills weren't good, they at least represented progress.

The problem for the Bears after the 10-3 victory is they'll be stuck all week on the number nine — the Bills' sack total. It's the same number the line allowed in the first half against the Giants last October, when Jay Cutler was lost to a concussion. The Bears return to New Meadowlands Stadium, where they set a dubious NFL record, to face the Giants in their next exhibition game Aug. 22.

"Too much pressure on the quarterback," coach Lovie Smith said. "We need to tighten that up."

Left tackle J'Marcus Webb needs to look a lot better, and he will be facing Jason Pierre-Paul, who had two sacks Saturday night against Panthers Pro Bowl left tackle Jordan Gross, and possibly an angry Osi Umenyiora, who has not received the contract he demanded.

Webb was responsible for at least two sacks in a half of action against the Bills and was dominated early by Shawne Merriman, who had two sacks and forced a third in nine snaps.

"Maybe I didn't match his intensity," Webb said. "They came out as if we were in the regular season, and obviously I didn't. I've got to get a little bit better."

That's a scary admission, but Webb fielded questions honestly afterward, knowing he can't look like that the next time out.

Evaluating the offensive line in preseason is tricky. There wasn't any chip blocking or tight end help that you'll see during the regular season. The Bears, of course, are better off with running back Matt Forte out in a short pattern than throwing a shoulder into a pass rusher.

Depending on how the coaches break down the tape, at least one-third of the sacks were the result of the quarterback holding the ball too long or receivers failing to break open. You can't always pile it on the line, but when it's the group that allowed a league-high 56 sacks last season, it's the first place everyone points. For all the knocks, the offense rushed for 164 yards, averaging 4.7 per carry.

Young right guard Lance Louis also looked a little overwhelmed, and that was coming off two solid weeks of training camp. He's a physical performer who fell flat on his face at times.

"My technique was all over the place," Louis said. "And I just feel real bad about the way I performed. I can't afford to do that."

The best news was Roberto Garza looked experienced at center and Carimi was poised at right tackle. They should have confidence moving forward.

"I thought I played pretty well," Carimi said. "I had solid technique, and I'll just keep on trying. I've got to get better every day."

The Bears could sub out Louis if they move Garza back to his familiar right guard spot and insert newcomer Chris Spencer, who played well in the second half, at center. They're unlikely to have a quick trigger, but that's a definite option.

There isn't much of a fall-back plan at left tackle. Presumably the club has learned from experience about yo-yoing players around, and that should discourage them from moving Carimi. If other teams thought Carimi was a left tackle, he wouldn't have lasted until No. 29 in the draft.

The solution is Webb has to come ready to play.

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 07:57:36 am
I think our opening day line will be Spencer at center, Garza RG, Williams LG.  As good as Carimi looked and how Webb struggled I could see them possibly switching them two.  If they do they need to do it sooner rather then later.  Same with Spencer and moving Garza to RT where he has excelled.

Pekin, I also liked the way Spencer pulled on that one play. Now were they to insert Spencer at RG that might have a positive effect because a pulling guard is a good thing to have and experience next to Carimi at RT might solidify that line

Pekin since you are now an Administrator I will put the job on your capable shoulders to get a hold of Yapper and find out whats happened to him. TYVM in advance
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 08:04:31 am
Wshful just click on his name get his e-mail address and e-mail him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 15, 2011, 08:06:27 am
I watched a little bit of the end of the replay last night.
I liked watching Unga move the pile. Overall we ran the ball pretty well. With some game planning our line might be ok if they can keep running the ball.
I saw some quicks on 93, I think that is Harrison. I didn't see him make any plays but he got off the ball quick at times.
Paea seemed to be playing in the mud or something. Maybe it is too fast for him but I would think our D would be pretty simple for a DT most of the time, shoot this gap and hit the guy with the ball.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 08:07:00 am
Wshful just click on his name get his e-mail address and e-mail him.

I certainly could do that, however dont you think thats an Administrators job? If you ask me to I will do that
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 08:11:08 am
I watched a little bit of the end of the replay last night.
I liked watching Unga move the pile. Overall we ran the ball pretty well. With some game planning our line might be ok if they can keep running the ball.
I saw some quicks on 93, I think that is Harrison. I didn't see him make any plays but he got off the ball quick at times.
Paea seemed to be playing in the mud or something. Maybe it is too fast for him but I would think our D would be pretty simple for a DT most of the time, shoot this gap and hit the guy with the ball.

OTOH I watched the replay of the first half because thats where the game was won or lost and thats where the starters played for both teams. Besides, I was awake for the live action in the 2nd half of the game
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 08:11:56 am
I don't know that it is anyone's job.  If you are concerned about him you should e-mail him. 

He may be busy or lost internet connection or found a new board to post on.  I personally don't assume the worst when someone stops posting.

   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 08:13:37 am
Nav, with 90 guys on the roster they are duplicating numbers out of neccesity. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 08:15:54 am
I don't know that it is anyone's job.  If you are concerned about him you should e-mail him. 

He may be busy or lost internet connection or found a new board to post on.  I personally don't assume the worst when someone stops posting.

   

Hmmm. Very well
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 08:27:18 am
Well when I clicked his e-mail address didnt pop up but supposedly I did send him a message. I thought Administrators had all of our e-mail addresses
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 15, 2011, 08:50:38 am
Well I liked what I saw Spencer do, just hope he learns the playbook asap.  And I cant believe I am saying this, but Kahlil Bell looked good.  If I was Chester Taylor I would be putting my house up for sale right now.  It sucks that Wooten got hurt on the first play of the game, I was looking forward to seeing what he can do. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 15, 2011, 08:51:51 am
yeah, I know 70 was on O and D but I don't think we would have two guys with the same number on D.
Also I think with being over weight Harrison is down low on the depth chart so that would put him playing in the 4th Q when I was watching.

I don't understand guys. I mean I think Harrison has the talent to be pushing for a starting job. If I am him, I work my butt off in the offseason so that I am ready for the season to start and I am impressing the coaches to get playing time. these guys are handed a freaking dream and they don't take advantage. I mean it isn't like he was a high 1st rounder that should feel entitled to play, he was a mid rounder that hasn't sniffed the starting lineup that could be cut in 2 weeks. They freaking drafted a guy in April that could take your job, get in shape.

I think Taylor is the odd man out unless we have an injury.
Forte, Barber, Bell, Unga are plenty of guys who look like they can carry the load.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 08:58:03 am
Well when I clicked his e-mail address didnt pop up but supposedly I did send him a message. I thought Administrators had all of our e-mail addresses

Go to Members at the top of the page then choose "Search for Members" and type in "yapper".  Search, then you can e-mail him from there unless he has specifically marked his profile so that people can't e-mail him.  Which if that is the case we should respect his privacy.

Yes I can see his e-mail address but I don't know if that is an administrator thing or everyone can see it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 09:01:23 am
Also it has only been a week and a half since he posted he may be on vacation.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 09:11:09 am
Go to Members at the top of the page then choose "Search for Members" and type in "yapper".  Search, then you can e-mail him from there unless he has specifically marked his profile so that people can't e-mail him.  Which if that is the case we should respect his privacy.

Yes I can see his e-mail address but I don't know if that is an administrator thing or everyone can see it.

Well I wasnt able to see his e-mail address, but supposedly I did send him a message.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 09:13:10 am
Bears’ offensive line fails to impress in 10-3 win over Bills
BY SEAN JENSEN sejensen@suntimes.com August 13, 2011 6:56PM

Updated: August 14, 2011 12:44AM



The Bears’ starters only made a cursory appearance in the preseason opener Saturday at Soldier Field, but the initial impression against the Buffalo Bills wasn’t overwhelmingly positive.

Bears quarterbacks were sacked nine times, and the starting offense mustered only 10 yards — when Jay Cutler was flushed out of the pocket and scrambled for a first down.

The Bears, however, pulled off a feat that eluded them last year: They won a preseason game.

They beat Buffalo 10-3, but their most beleaguered unit didn’t do anything to deflect the negative attention.

“Too much pressure on the quarterback,” coach Lovie Smith said. “We have to tighten that up a little bit.”

Offensive line coach Mike Tice will need more than an ordinary screwdriver to fix his group.

Cutler and backup Caleb Hanie were sacked four times, although the starting offensive line wasn’t entirely to blame for all of them.

“I don’t know what the issues were on a couple of sacks,” Hanie said, “whether it’s QB timing or whatever.”

But extensive knowledge of football intricacies wasn’t needed to realize the offense’s sixth play was a mess. On third-and-six from the Bears’ 35, left tackle J’Marcus Webb was knocked backward by Bills linebacker Shawne Merriman while right guard Lance Louis was smoked by rookie defensive tackle Marcell Dareus.

Dareus won the footrace to Cutler, and Webb was flagged for holding Merriman.

“I just had my head down, and he did a simple club move, and he made the sack,” Louis said. “It was all me.”

A tight end at San Diego State, Louis started the first four games last year before he was slowed by a knee injury and eventually replaced in the starting lineup. Enamored with Louis’ athleticism, the Bears are hopeful he can establish himself this season, and he appeared to have a strong start to training camp.

But Louis admitted Saturday was a setback.

“Honestly, I’ve got a lot of work to do,” he said. “My technique was all over the place, and I just feel real bad about the way I performed.”

Asked about the opportunity before him, Louis said, “I’m grateful, but I have to perform better and show them that I belong.

“I can’t afford to have this type of a game. I’m not a first-round pick. I’m not guaranteed anything.”

Tice said last week that his starting five is set, but it’s still unclear whether Roberto Garza is the team’s best bet at center — especially with Chris Spencer behind him — and if an available veteran might be needed to shore up the line.

For his part, Cutler emphatically backed his line.

“They were good,” he said. “They will be fine. There are some bright spots out there.”

Despite the victory, the Bears trailed 3-0 when most of the starters on offense and defense left the field after three series.

The Bears rallying to win shouldn’t come as a surprise; the Bills were 4-12 last season, so depth is definitely not a strength.

And the defending NFC North champion Bears showed off some of the players who accepted lesser deals to join them, most notably running back Marion Barber and defensive tackle Amobi Okoye.

Barber had 45 yards on seven carries, keying the game’s only touchdown drive early in the second quarter, and Okoye had both of the Bears’ sacks.

Another of the team’s ballyhooed free agents, receiver Roy Williams, only played in one series and didn’t have a pass thrown his way.

“It felt good,” Williams said of his Bears debut. “A little different not being in a Detroit Lions uniform on the other side, but it feels like home.”

The Bears play next Monday, Aug. 22, at the New Meadowlands against the New York Giants. Until then, after a day off, the Bears will return to Olivet Nazarene University in Bourbonnais on Monday to complete their final week of training camp.

There will be plenty to work on.

“We need to get better,” Bears linebacker Brian Urlacher said. “That’s all there is to it.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 09:19:45 am
http://www.csnchicago.com/08/14/11/Moon-Changes-in-order-for-the-O-line-/landing_moon_v3.html?blockID=548962&feedID=626

Looks like Mullin is thinking along the same lines I am.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 10:01:39 am
If someone “falters,” as Louis and Webb did to greater or lesser degrees Saturday, the result is dropping out of the top five, not necessarily being “beaten out” by a replacement.

Well whatever you want to call it, changes have to be made.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 15, 2011, 12:04:51 pm
did they get better as the half went on? I can see those guys hosing it up the first 10 snaps or so but then maybe settling in.
It's not like Merriman is a slouch either. He'll beat good LT's who have been in systems for a long time when healthy. I think he is healthy and hungry now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 12:19:55 pm
They gave up nine sacks the entire game. I think 5 were while the starting O-line was in.  They gave up three sacks in the first two possessions.  Two of them back to back.

Hanie was holding onto the ball to long but the O-line was still getting beat. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 15, 2011, 12:21:34 pm
Tice has to be held accountable this year if the line goes to crap worse than last season.  Carimi was a great LT at  Wisconsin and a very important position that need an upgrade.  That's why he was drafted for his ability to protect Cutler's blind side but he's moved to J'Marcus Webb's spot where he was starting to play well and Webb was moved to LT.

This is on Tice period.  I wouldn't play Cutler but a couple of series next Monday night so he won't be on the IR.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 15, 2011, 01:06:07 pm

First things first...

Jackie said: 
 The one I heard about Butkus was when Mean Joe Green came off of a play and spit on Butkus.

 Butkus didnt react ... thats when observers knew Butkus' days were over.

 Can anyone verify this?


I don't know when and if this really happened but I do I recall someone saying that when Butkus was asked why he didn't respond to Joe Greene,  Butkus said something like he was too busy making all-pro. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 15, 2011, 01:16:07 pm

Saw some of the game on the vodka network...thanks to wmljohn.

I was probably the biggest J'Marcus Webb cheerleader last year, but I was wondering why so many here and in the media weren't concerned when he was named the starting LT after a few days in camp.  I'm not saying he can't do it.  But the Bears better have a backup plan in place by the 3rd PS game...and I think his name is Frank Omiyale.

Like some of you I wondered why Carimi, who played LT last season in college, wasn't given first crack at the job.  I guess Tice saw that he wasn't ready and figured that Webb was the best guy for the job...this year.

Lance Louis didn't have a very good game and he might have just one more game before the Bears shuffle the deck with Spencer and Garza.  Louis is big and athletic enough he just needs more work on his technique...same as Webb.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 15, 2011, 01:26:55 pm

I was not that happy about the signing of Chester Taylor last season.  He was 31 and his ypc average had been trending downard.  But even though he didn't have a great season statistically last year I thought he really helped the Bears.

But right now I don't see how he beats out Barber who is bigger and 4 years younger.  And after Saturday's performance Khalil Bell is on his way to making the team.  He should take Garrett Wolfe's 3rd HB spot and will have contribute on STs.  The 4th HB spot, which Bell had last year,  should go to Unga which means he won't suit up for many games.

Of course this is assuming we don't carry ANY FBs.  We still have 2 on the roster and they're playing a lot in the PS.  We didn't have any on the roster last year.  So I don't know what Martz is up to.  2 or 3 QBs?  3 or 4 TEs?  3 or 4 HBs?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 15, 2011, 01:51:56 pm
Yapper is back...  I was on vacation without Internet access last week.  But I appreciate the concern.

Missed the game too.

Great to hear about Barber and the D-Line (other than the Wootten injury of course). 

Very disappointed to hear about the OL but I can't say I'm too surprised.  Lance Louis did not look good in a starting role last year and I have a feeling we're going to very much regret not adding a legit starting OG via FA sooner than later.

How did our WRs and Kellen Davis look?  Based on the score I'm gonna guess our air game is still in mothballs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 02:17:52 pm
Yapper next time you go on vacation can you let Wshful know ahead of time?   ;D

Our air game was pretty bad mostly due to the line sucking and the QB's not getting rid of the ball.  Knox had a nice first down catch on a slant from Hanie but that was pretty much the highlight.

Kris Adams had some nice grabs from the 3rd string QB Enderle.  The O-line did awesome run blocking.  Spencer was making his block then getting to the next guy.  I can't remember the last time I saw Kruetz do that.

If it was me Spencer would be C, Garza back to RG and Louis to the bench.  I would give Webb one more shot at LT and if he does not get it done I would switch him and Carimi.  Believe it or not Williams and Carimi looked like our best two linemen out there.  Garza wasn't bad at center I just think we need to get the best 5 on the field and that means sending Louis to the bench.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 15, 2011, 02:26:59 pm
As far as Carimi is concerned, someone gave the most reasonable answer a number of posts ago.  If the scouts thought he could play left tackle in the pros, he would have been drafted much earlier in the first round.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 15, 2011, 02:41:55 pm
As far as Carimi is concerned, someone gave the most reasonable answer a number of posts ago.  If the scouts thought he could play left tackle in the pros, he would have been drafted much earlier in the first round.

And what did those same scouts think about J'Marcus Webb's chances at playing LT in the pros?

I really really want to believe Tice knows what he's doing, but after putting Chris Williams out there at LT after a dreadful preseason last year...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 15, 2011, 02:42:54 pm
I think Tice should move in to Spencers house to spoon feed him the play book until he knows it inside out.  We need him at C so Garza can slide back to G.  I see no need to see Lance Louis again.  Lets see how he does next week, but just saying....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 15, 2011, 02:54:50 pm
Kris Sanzeb...(looking up spelling)...acher and Kris Adams could make a case for the Bears keeping a 6th WR.  Sanzenbacher didn't have a big game Saturday but his change of direction quickness was evident in a move he made where he was interfered with.  And Kris Adams is 6-3 and looks like a beanpole out there but he showed some nice hands and had 2 or 3 grabs.  I wonder what his 40 time is?

I still think our 5 WRs our set with RoyW, Knox, Hester, Bennett and Hurd (who BTW forced the fumble that never was on the kickoff).  Both those young guys appear to be good bets to make the practice squad and just might force the Bears into considering 6 WRs.

Did I miss the Andy Fantuz sighting?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 15, 2011, 02:58:33 pm
Does Enderle look like he's got what it takes for the NFL... even if just as a career backup?

He's got NFL QB size but from what I hear his arm doesn't match up to his frame, and his mobilty is below average.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 15, 2011, 03:05:08 pm
I think Tice should move in to Spencers house to spoon feed him the play book until he knows it inside out.  We need him at C so Garza can slide back to G.  I see no need to see Lance Louis again.  Lets see how he does next week, but just saying....

Lance Louis deserves another long look and will get it going up against the Giants at the site of last year's massacre.

Physically Louis has everything you're looking for at guard...size (320) and speed (sub 4.8 40).   If he can show some improvement and quit getting his QB frequently knocked down he might be a keeper.

We know Garza can play RG and we know Spencer can play center.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 15, 2011, 03:11:24 pm
if I remember right Carimi is already really good at run blocking( I think I read "almost elite" in one article), already ahead of Webb but they don't think he would ever be a great LT. Webb apparently has the size and athletic ability to be a LT but isn't quite there yet.

I might would wait another game but I think if I were to change things, leave Carimi at RT and put Omiyale at LT and let Webb learn for another year.
at G, decide soon if Louis can do it else do something with Garza, Spencer and Edwin Williams.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 15, 2011, 03:17:02 pm
Carimi did just fine pass blocking as did Williams.  Louis and
Webb were the two getting owned.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 03:24:18 pm
And we also know Spencer can play OG. As I posted above somewhere Edwin Williams also had a good game pancaking guys. He is another guard/center.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 15, 2011, 03:30:29 pm
Carimi did just fine pass blocking as did Williams.  Louis and
Webb were the two getting owned.

Just FWIW, Louis was a 6th round draft pick and Webb was a 7th.  Maybe you get what you pay for after all... even on the OL?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 15, 2011, 03:32:38 pm
Yapper next time you go on vacation can you let Wshful know ahead of time?

Yeah, that'd be a good idea.  ;D  Must be nice to afford a vacation  :'( 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 15, 2011, 08:25:09 pm
Tried to post a link and failed. Says the Bears kicked off from the 30, not the 35 until called and told to stop.  Kinda nice to see the old and beloved Bear giving the nfl suits the finger.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 16, 2011, 12:30:19 am
Tried to post a link and failed. Says the Bears kicked off from the 30, not the 35 until called and told to stop.  Kinda nice to see the old and beloved Bear giving the nfl suits the finger.

 BEARRSSE did.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 16, 2011, 12:42:57 am
Tried to post a link and failed. Says the Bears kicked off from the 30, not the 35 until called and told to stop.  Kinda nice to see the old and beloved Bear giving the nfl suits the finger.

Oh they deserve the finger, but the good little Bears did behave and ask first...

Bears' Toub defends decision to kick off from 30-yard line (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-toub-defends-decision-to-kick-off-from-30yard-line-20110815,0,4615807.story)

Before the game, the referee and officiating crew told the Bears it was OK, and the team also informed Bills coach Chan Gailey, who had no issue with it.

“We talked to the NFL beforehand during the offseason and they said it was going to be OK. So that’s why we did it,” Toub explained Monday at training camp.  “I guess it came down from New York. They got word that we can’t kick from the 30 and then we just went back to the 35 after that. We thought we could do it. We thought we were clear with it. We told the officials ahead of time that is what we were going to do. They were fine with it. That’s why we kicked from the 30. We were just trying to evaluate our kickoff team. You don’t get any evaluation when you kick touchbacks. That’s what preseason is for -- it’s about evaluation and finding who can cover kicks. That’s all we were trying to do.”

The new rule is vague in that it doesn’t specify the ball has to be kicked off from the 35. A five-yard penalty, of course, would move a club back to the 30.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 16, 2011, 12:54:49 am
Bears may have interest in waived Bills LB Maybin (http://www.chicagotribune.com/site/newspaper/sports/ct-spt-0816-bears-bits--20110816,0,800171.story)

The Bears could be in the market for yet another reclamation project.  According to multiple sources, the team has had discussions about Aaron Maybin, who was waived by the Bills on Monday. All indications are the 11th pick of the 2009 draft wants to play for defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli.  The Bears and 30 other teams have until 3 p.m. Tuesday to consider placing a claim for Maybin. His contract for the next three years is affordable. He's owed $757,500 this season and $3.36 million through 2013. The question is whether anyone believes he'll produce if he's moved to defensive end from outside linebacker, where he lacked instincts.  Mario Addison, an undrafted free agent out of Troy, has impressed coaches and earned second-team reps Monday. The Bears also have seen some good things from former Jet Vernon Gholston. They want to see more.  Like Gholston, the 23-year-old Maybin has yet to register an NFL sack (27 games) despite entering the league with great expectations out of Penn State. If the Bears take a chance on him, they'd want him to bulk up immediately. He reported to Bills camp at 228 pounds.  The waiver system is currently based on last year's standings, meaning the Bears select 29th in the event they're involved and multiple teams place a claim for him. As late as they are in the process, if the Bears are interested it might make more sense for them to see if he clears waivers to then negotiate a short-term contract like they did with Gholston.

Heady stuff: Cornerback Zack Bowman said he didn't suffer a concussion when he laid a big hit on Bills receiver Paul Hubbard, but he was held out of Monday's practice and that is what the team classified his injury as.

"I don't know what it was," Bowman said. "I'll tell you this, it was bang-bang. I just laid on the ground for a second, got stable. Everything checked out good. So I should be ready to go."

Bowman admitted he was "out of it" for about 15 seconds. He may be out of practice a few days. Wide receiver Earl Bennett also sat out after an awkward landing on his head trying to catch a pass, but it was announced he did not have a concussion.

Does Enderle look like he's got what it takes for the NFL... even if just as a career backup?

He's got NFL QB size but from what I hear his arm doesn't match up to his frame, and his mobilty is below average.

Apparently the coaching staff thinks so.  They gave him all the second team reps yesterday (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-hanie-upset-after-yielding-secondteam-reps-to-enderle-20110815,0,145502.story) ahead of Hanie.

"After you play a game, your reps change a little bit based on what you’ve done,’’ Smith said. "We got Nathan Enderle a couple more reps today with the 2s. He did some good things in the game. He hadn’t really gotten a lot of reps in practice right now...He did a few things (Saturday). We want to see what he can do when he gets a few more reps in practice.  Caleb didn’t play as well as I thought he did initially. Again, first preseason game. All the guys will get better.’’
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 16, 2011, 01:03:47 am
After shaky exhibition opener, Bears' Webb picks up intensity in practice (http://www.chicagotribune.com/site/newspaper/sports/ct-spt-0816-bears-webb--20110816,0,6248843.story)

Whatever fire line coach Mike Tice lit under Webb after the game — and the guess here is it was a multi-alarm blaze — it worked Monday afternoon. Webb was as intense as he has ever been in practice, walling off Peppers in one-on-one pass-rushing drills.

"I can't wait to see the film," Tice said. "I know for a fact that was his best one-on-ones. He's a hell of a talent. He just needs to realize that just because you're gifted, it's not going to be easy."

Webb and the offensive linemen ran sprints after practice, something they don't do very often.

"I took it upon myself to practice with more of a purpose and practice with more intensity," he said.

Webb probably regrets saying after Saturday's game that he didn't match the intensity of Merriman, the former Pro Bowl star who has been derailed for three seasons by injuries.

"I played for a long time and I don't know that I ever had that (intensity) problem," Tice said. "I have a problem with that from a personal standpoint — a player that's saying he didn't have the intensity level. I mean, after sitting around for five months you should have plenty of intensity built up inside you.  He's got to understand we put a world of weight on his shoulders. He needs to step up and play better and he needs to grow up quicker. He's out on the island with our philosophy this year, hoping that we don't keep backs in and chip. He needs to buck up."

-----------------------------------

My guess is Webb is one more poor preseason game away from going to plan B (Carimi or Omigawd).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 16, 2011, 01:08:42 am
I think our opening day line will be Spencer at center, Garza RG, Williams LG.  As good as Carimi looked and how Webb struggled I could see them possibly switching them two.  If they do they need to do it sooner rather then later.  Same with Spencer and moving Garza to RT where he has excelled.

 Thats the REAL starting lineup. You dont draft Carimi and sign Spencer to hold water buckets.

 LT Carimi 6'7" 316 lbs.

 LG Williams 6'6" 320 lbs.

 C Spencer 6'3" 309 lbs.

 RG Garza 6'2" 310 lbs.

 RT Webb  6'8" 333 lbs. 

 Anybody see any problems ...other than the fact Garza is too short ...nyuk!

 I think the Redskins used to call a line like this : HAWGS.

 We need a name for our line too ... how about POLAR BEAR ?

 The polar bear is the largest terrestrial carnivore, being more than twice as big as the Siberian tiger.

 Adult males weigh 350–680 kg (770–1500 lbs) and measure 2.4–3 m (7.9–9.8 ft) in length.

 Adult females are roughly half the size of males and normally weigh 150–249 kg (330–550 lb),

 measuring 1.8–2.4 metres (5.9–7.9 ft) in length.

 When pregnant, however, they can weigh as much as 499 kg (1,100 lb). Sign em!
 
 The largest polar bear on record, reportedly weighing 1,002 kg (2,210 lb), was a male shot at

 Kotzebue Sound in northwestern Alaska in 1960.

 The shoulder height of the polar bear is 130–160 cm (51–63 in).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 16, 2011, 01:26:36 am
Despite salary cap space, Angelo insists Bears have plan for success (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/7070082-606/despite-salary-cap-space-angelo-insists-bears-have-plan-for-success.html)

So despite having $30 million in salary-cap space, the Bears weren’t among the more active and aggressive teams at the start of free agency last month. They didn’t want to overspend in a buyer’s market.

‘‘Whatever we do, we want to do it with a plan,’’ Angelo told the Sun-Times recently. ‘‘It’s not that we just frivolously go out and collect talent. Everyone we brought in here, we have a plan for. .  .  . And it’s not like we have a $20 bill burning a hole in our pocket to spend.’’

Angelo still has about $19 million in cap space, although the Bears aren’t obligated to spend all of that to bump up against the 2011 salary cap of $120 million.  The Bears intended to have less money left. They came up short in their pursuit of offensive tackle Willie Colon from the Pittsburgh Steelers, but Angelo insisted the Bears are pleased with the offensive linemen they have on their roster. He did hedge just a bit, though.

Asked whether the Bears are done addressing that unit, Angelo said, ‘‘We would revisit it if we don’t like what we see.’’

While he didn’t deny being interested in Colon, Angelo also made it clear the Bears weren’t desperate to land him. The only player in recent memory the Bears locked in on was defensive end Julius Peppers, whom they made the highest-paid defensive end in the league last year.

‘‘What you want to do is create options,’’ Angelo said. ‘‘You don’t want to get yourself pigeonholed and, if it doesn’t work, the bottom falls out. If you don’t get Package A, it doesn’t mean Package B won’t be a good package.’’

So other than signing Chris Spencer to a two-year, $6 million contact, the Bears haven’t pursued any offensive linemen, even though a number of credible ones are still available.  Bryant McKinnie, Nick Kaczur, Mario Henderson, Max Starks, Flozell Adams, Mark Tauscher and Langston Walker are among the tackles available, and free-agent guards Leonard Davis, Brian Waters, Vince Manuwai, Shawn Andrews and Reggie Wells are still out there.  Angelo said the Bears wouldn’t close the door on signing another veteran on the offensive line, but he indicated they want to give some of their younger players a chance.

‘‘At some point, you have to let these young guys develop,’’ Angelo said. ‘‘You bring in [a veteran], and he takes reps away from Lance Louis. So you know what? This young guy is on the shelf again. At some point, you have to believe in his traits, and then you have to let it play itself out.  You can’t just continue to grab Band-Aids because the guys you have are unknown.’’

Bears’ Mike Tice expects offensive line to see ‘big jump’ vs. Giants (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/7090155-606/bears-mike-tice-expects-offensive-line-to-see-big-jump-vs.-giants)

‘‘We had a handful of guys that played good, and I think those guys are evident,’’ Tice said. ‘‘We had a couple of guys that were on the cusp of playing winning football but didn’t. Then we had some guys that didn’t play well.  Not to call anyone out, [but] I think everybody knows who those guys are. It was pretty evident. They’re young. They need to improve this week. Normally from the first preseason game to the second, guys make a big jump. We’re looking for that big jump. I thought they bounced back today at practice and practiced well.  We don’t want to play musical lines, and we don’t want to hit a panic button because the [sack] numbers are what they are.  We can make [up] a lot of numbers. We can say that we gave up nine sacks. We could look at the ones that the line is accountable for and see if it’s possible to correct those things, and I really believe that we can.  So we’re going to work diligently on correcting those things this week and hopefully bounce back and have a great week of practice and carry more of those good practices over into the game [Monday against the New York Giants].’’

Louis at right guard didn’t play well after excelling in practice, but he doesn’t deserve to be flogged for his performance just yet, Tice said. Carimi was inconsistent and made rookie mistakes in his first NFL game, but he played better in the game than he had been playing in practice and will stay at right tackle.

''I think it's important to stay the course right now,'' Tice said, ''and stay positive, continue to teach and continue to have them accept teaching and hard coaching, and push themselves farther than they think they can go, and see if we can improve in a big jump this week, and see if we carry it over to Monday night.  I'm more encouraged than I was at this point last year, when we were playing musical lines.  I felt we ran the ball pretty good, which we didn't do [well] at any point last preseason. So at least we can come out of it with that positive spin on it.  You don't like the [sack] numbers. The numbers are there. But when you look at the tape and say, 'How many [sacks] did we account for?' We can clean up the ones that we're accountable for. I really believe that.''

Tice acknowledged that right guard Lance Louis was guilty of struggling after having played well in practice, but with an explanation.

''Maybe part of his weakness [that was exposed against the Bills] is he went against a guy who was drafted [No. 3] in the draft,'' Tice said, referring to Bills rookie defensive end Marcel Dareus. ''I mean the guy was drafted there for a reason. So anytime that you try to be overly aggressive with a guy and try to head-butt him and kill him, knock him off his feet and get yourself spread out, you're going to get beat.  That's what happened to Lance on the two occasions. He got himself overextended. He's the guy that's been practicing extremely well. He was the guy I was a little bit surprised at. As well as he's been practicing, he gave up a couple of big plays, bad plays. I think he'll have a great week of practice and bounce back and play better this week.''

Carimi, the rookie from Wisconsin who started at right tackle after having played left tackle in college, was inconsistent, but better in the game than he had been in practice. He's staying at right tackle, Tice said.

''If he's going to be the player that he can ultimately be, I think he can be a great right tackle,'' Tice said. ''Gabe was just the opposite [of Louis and Webb].  Gabe has had some bad sets in [practice].  Gabe went out and his best sets of camp were in the game.  He's a warrior and he's a player. The lights came on and he stepped up to the occasion.  Yeah, he had a couple of dumb mental errors, but he's a rookie.  Plays sound the same sometimes in the heat of the battle.  But I thought he played well for his first time out of there.  If he can continue to improve, we're really going to have a good one there."

Tice didn't profess to have any magic solution, but he was open to suggestions.

''I think everyone can sit here, all of us, and 100 percent identify what the problems are right now,'' Tice said. ''I'm acceptable to emails and suggestions if anybody has any other than, 'Work hard and get better.'  Fortunately the guys that didn't play up to par or how they've been practicing are young guys. Young guys can get better in leaps and bounds where as veteran guys tend to - at this stage of their career - make the same mistakes, and it's hard to fix those mistakes because they're entrenched in their ways.  What a great challenge, and what a great team to play against this week; a team that totally embarrassed us last year. So we should have a chip on our shoulder going into that game.''
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 16, 2011, 02:25:23 am
Like Gholston, the 23-year-old Maybin has yet to register an NFL sack (27 games) despite entering the league with great expectations out of Penn State. If the Bears take a chance on him, they'd want him to bulk up immediately. He reported to Bills camp at 228 pounds.

Can this guy just add 25 or 30 lbs in a few weeks?  He's a small 4-3 OLB right now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 16, 2011, 03:37:14 am
Bears may have interest in waived Bills LB Maybin (http://www.chicagotribune.com/site/newspaper/sports/ct-spt-0816-bears-bits--20110816,0,800171.story)

The Bears could be in the market for yet another reclamation project.  According to multiple sources, the team has had discussions about Aaron Maybin, who was waived by the Bills on Monday. All indications are the 11th pick of the 2009 draft wants to play for defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli.  The Bears and 30 other teams have until 3 p.m. Tuesday to consider placing a claim for Maybin. His contract for the next three years is affordable. He's owed $757,500 this season and $3.36 million through 2013.

 The Bears also have seen some good things from former Jet Vernon Gholston. They want to see more. 

 Like Gholston, the 23-year-old Maybin has yet to register an NFL sack (27 games) despite entering the league with great expectations out of Penn State.


 Didnt we just give up NINE SACKS to Buffalo ? And we want to hire yet more defensive players? WTF!?!?

 There comes a point when our head aint screwed on right anymore.  :D

 If the ship is sinking ... why are we making sure theres plenty of food in the ships storage bins?  ???
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 16, 2011, 06:19:14 am
Yapper next time you go on vacation can you let Wshful know ahead of time?   ;D

LOL!

If it was me Spencer would be C, Garza back to RG and Louis to the bench.  I would give Webb one more shot at LT and if he does not get it done I would switch him and Carimi.  Believe it or not Williams and Carimi looked like our best two linemen out there.  Garza wasn't bad at center I just think we need to get the best 5 on the field and that means sending Louis to the bench.

Couldn't agree more.  Webb settled in just fine last year at right tackle, and Spencer wasn't signed to be a back-up.  Let's see how this settles out with the Giants.  Couldn't be a bigger test.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 16, 2011, 07:18:52 am
I saw that. The Bears had it cleared with the League. They had approval and the Jerks from the League called during the game and told them to stop.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 16, 2011, 07:45:28 am
F*** Maybin. He'll never be anything in this league.

The guy we should be looking at is Stinchcomb from the Saints who got cut yesterday.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 16, 2011, 07:57:42 am
So other than signing Chris Spencer to a two-year, $6 million contact, the Bears haven’t pursued any offensive linemen, even though a number of credible ones are still available.  Bryant McKinnie, Nick Kaczur, Mario Henderson, Max Starks, Flozell Adams, Mark Tauscher and Langston Walker are among the tackles available, and free-agent guards Leonard Davis, Brian Waters, Vince Manuwai, Shawn Andrews and Reggie Wells are still out there.  Angelo said the Bears wouldn’t close the door on signing another veteran on the offensive line, but he indicated they want to give some of their younger players a chance.

‘‘At some point, you have to let these young guys develop,’’ Angelo said. ‘‘You bring in [a veteran], and he takes reps away from Lance Louis. So you know what? This young guy is on the shelf again. At some point, you have to believe in his traits, and then you have to let it play itself out.  You can’t just continue to grab Band-Aids because the guys you have are unknown.’’


If a guy deserves to be on the shelf so be it. Jesus God you cant just keep allowing sack after sack so some crumb bum gets reps. You need somebody to come in and solitify that line and stop the sacks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 16, 2011, 08:00:46 am
JJ, the Kodiak is pretty much the same size as the Polar bear and has a better ring to it.

Another thought, any thoughts on our new punter? I didn't even think about Maynard being gone.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 16, 2011, 08:01:35 am
Bears' Hanie upset after yielding second-team reps to Enderle
     
By Vaughn McClure
 
Tribune reporter
 
5:40 p.m. CDT, August 15, 2011
BOURBONNAIS -- Chicago Bears backup quarterback Caleb Hanie walked off the practice field Monday visibly upset and declined to talk to reporters.

His frustration no doubt stemmed from surrendering his second-team practice reps to rookie Nathan Enderle during the 2 1/2-hour session. In fact, Hanie didn’t get any reps at all during 7-on-7 and full-team drills.

Lovie Smith explained the decision after practice.

"After you play a game, your reps change a little bit based on what you’ve done,’’ Smith said. "We got Nathan Enderle a couple more reps today with the 2s. He did some good things in the game. He hadn’t really gotten a lot of reps in practice right now.’’

Enderle was asked when he knew he'd get more reps.

"When coach (Mike) Martz yelled out my name,'' he said.

In Saturday’s 10-3 exhibition win over Buffalo, Hanie completed 3 of 7 passes for 32 yards and was sacked three times after taking over for Jay Cutler. He did score on a 4-yard touchdown run. His passer rating was 56.8. Enderle complete 7 of 10 passes for 110 yards with an interception. He was sacked five times.

"As I said earlier, Nathan hasn’t gotten hardly any reps in practice,’’ Smith said. "He did a few things (Saturday). We want to see what he can do when he gets a few more reps in practice.

"Caleb didn’t play as well as I thought he did initially. Again, first preseason game. All the guys will get better.’’

In other news, Zack Bowman, Earl Bennett, Anthony Adams and J.T. Thomas all sat out practice, while Smith confirmed Corey Wootton is set to miss a month after a knee scope scheduled for Tuesday.

vxmcclure@tribune.com

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 16, 2011, 08:03:02 am
Enderle looked solid. The problem I see with him is his internal clock isn't there yet. He eyes down the reciever. On one play, he literally stood there and stared down the reciever and when he did attempt to throw,it was knocked down. He needs that clock inside that says 'this guy isn't open,next option'. Instead he stands there eyeing the guy down till he's open. And his footwork during that sucked as well. Flat footed,immobile. A target waiting to be buried by a aggressive DE. It seemed to me that alot of the problems with the sacks this game was unopen recievers, or possibly the QB determined to go one route and not checking down fast enough. Too much holding the ball. They need the 'reciever 1 covered, rec 2 covered, 3 same, run lanes open? no...toss it away.'
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 16, 2011, 08:08:51 am
Khalil Bell played very well and ran aggressively. He is seriously pushing for a spot on the roster.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 16, 2011, 08:18:41 am
I saw it posted that the #3 back has to be a ST guy as well. So Bell is setting himself up to be the #3 RB and Chester Taylor doesnt play ST. So Barber replaces Taylor who doesnt play ST which Bell does. That also pushes Unga to the taxi squad I would guess.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 16, 2011, 09:06:21 am
I saw it posted that the #3 back has to be a ST guy as well. So Bell is setting himself up to be the #3 RB and Chester Taylor doesnt play ST. So Barber replaces Taylor who doesnt play ST which Bell does. That also pushes Unga to the taxi squad I would guess.

I would be OK with that outcome. In the perfect world we wouldn't have had to pick up Barber at all cause Unga would have established himself as our power back by now. But with what Barber has showed, we have the luxury of giving Unga more time to grow into the role assuming of course he doesn't get plucked off the PS by another team. Kudos to Angelo & Co. for being pro-active in the RB department as compared to a couple years ago when we had Forte and NOBODY of quality behind him.  Taylor appears to be the odd man out especially at the money he's making.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 16, 2011, 09:16:42 am
http://www.nwherald.com/2011/08/16/o-line-gets-2nd-chance/a3zo0sh/

Sounds like the O-line gets one more shot then they are going to make changes if need be.  I also read in a different article that Spencer got "one" rep at center with the ones.  So I am guessing that was a threat to Louis to get his shiitt together or be replaced.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 16, 2011, 02:06:36 pm

Bears kept FOUR HBs last season so there could be room for Unga on the 53 man roster.  Question is are they going to keep any fullbacks?  If they keep one or two then they will have to go with 3 HBs and/or 3 TEs.

Its way too early to determine if Unga is a keeper but if he keeps playing like he did Saturday he will get snatched off the PS.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 16, 2011, 02:19:35 pm
Tice has praised Louis for great practices but puzzled over his sloppy game. On the other hand, Tice credited Carimi for a good game after the rookie struggled at times during his first two weeks of practice.



Basically, practice isn't always a good indicator of performance in a game.   I guess Chris Williams last preseason had great practices.

I think everyone needs to just relax and let Webb and Louis go after it Monday.  Webb has exactly one start at LT in his pro career and that was last week.  Louis had 4 starts last year and one last weekend at RG.  You can't expect these guys to just step in and play consistently... especially a LT.    Neither were considered blue chip players coming out of college so they will need some time.

Unfortunately, Tice has to balance their need to get more experience with the need of the team to protect Jay Cutler's life.   He's got about 3 more weeks.

What I'd like to see next week is for the Bears to give Spencer a series or two at center with 1s.  And while your at it why not let Carimi get some time at LT too.

If Carimi graded well at RT whose to say he can't play LT...in a real game...not practice.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 16, 2011, 02:21:33 pm
Yeah but (Unga) did that against 3rd and 4th stringers. While impressive carrying 4 guys on his back for 5 yards on one play, its the level of competition that makes me skeptical of his ability to contribute against starters. He also didnt gain any brownie points by missing most of the week due to the birth of his baby. He gives me the impression he is a slacker.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 16, 2011, 02:23:31 pm
Bears kept FOUR HBs last season so there could be room for Unga on the 53 man roster. 

True, however one of the "HBs" was really not a RB at all but a special teamer (Garrett Wolfe) labeled as a RB. I'm not sure Wolfe took a single snap with the offense in a game situation last year.

Unga can really beef-up his chances of sticking on the 53-man roster by 1) playing lights out on STs and 2) not missing any more practice or game time due to injuries, new baby or whatever.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 16, 2011, 02:31:05 pm
I think everyone needs to just relax and let Webb and Louis go after it Monday.  Webb has exactly one start at LT in his pro career and that was last week.  Louis had 4 starts last year and one last weekend at RG.  You can't expect these guys to just step in and play consistently... especially a LT.    Neither were considered blue chip players coming out of college so they will need some time.

Which hits exactly on the point. Notice that Carimi did just fine his first time out. Could it possibly be that when you spend high draft picks on consensus "blue-chip" guys who have played dozens of games against top college competetion, you get guys who require a significantly shorter ramp-up time than bottom-round guys playing at the Division I-a level or lower (Louis and Webb)?   

Of course the counter argument to that is Chris Williams, also a high 1st round pick who also played many college games against top competition and who after 3 or 4 seasons still hasn't established himself as anything better than a barely passable interior OL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 16, 2011, 02:59:52 pm
Which hits exactly on the point. Notice that Carimi did just fine his first time out. Could it possibly be that when you spend high draft picks on consensus "blue-chip" guys who have played dozens of games against top college competetion, you get guys who require a significantly shorter ramp-up time than bottom-round guys playing at the Division I-a level or lower (Louis and Webb)?   

Of course the counter argument to that is Chris Williams, also a high 1st round pick who also played many college games against top competition and who after 3 or 4 seasons still hasn't established himself as anything better than a barely passable interior OL.

Good point. The reason is that Angelo doesnt want to spend high draft picks on OLmen. And he stonewalls going after a veteran FA because it would take reps away from his pet players that he wants the jobs to go to.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 16, 2011, 03:05:28 pm
Good point. The reason is that Angelo doesnt want to spend high draft picks on OLmen. And he stonewalls going after a veteran FA because it would take reps away from his pet players that he wants the jobs to go to.

Yup.  He is willing to see his QB's career prematurely ended -- for whom he gave up THREE HIGH DRAFT PICKS and a starting QB -- in exchange for the chance to look like good on the outside chance his 6th and 7th round OL picks pan out. 

Talk about penny wise and pound foolish. Angelo's thought process is f**ked up beyond belief and his heir apparent Ruskell is no better.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 16, 2011, 03:21:58 pm
Exactly correct which is why if I were Cuttler I would be terrified and I would be angry that my GM didnt value my protection any more than what he does. How then does that make Angelo look if his QB goes down with a serious injury because the line cant protect?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 16, 2011, 03:27:59 pm
Exactly correct which is why if I were Cuttler I would be terrified and I would be angry that my GM didnt value my protection any more than what he does. How then does that make Angelo look if his QB goes down with a serious injury because the line cant protect?

Well, it would make Angelo look entirely like the dumba-ss that everyone outside of Halas Hall knows he is... but that doesn't make any difference cause it's still his job as long as he wants it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 16, 2011, 03:28:40 pm
True, however one of the "HBs" was really not a RB at all but a special teamer (Garrett Wolfe) labeled as a RB. I'm not sure Wolfe took a single snap with the offense in a game situation last year.

Unga can really beef-up his chances of sticking on the 53-man roster by 1) playing lights out on STs and 2) not missing any more practice or game time due to injuries, new baby or whatever.

Khalil Bell was the #4 last year.  Rarely dressed if ever and really wasn't counted on on special teams.  That's the roster spot Unga would take.  Putting Unga there makes him an insurance policy in case of injury and keeps him on the roster for next year so he can challenge Barber.   Bell, on the other hand, takes Wolfe's spot, which requires full time STs play and is only an insurance policy at HB on game day.

I'd bet that Forte and Taylor ran 99% of the HB plays.  Wolfe might have had some mopup duty somewhere along the line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 16, 2011, 03:29:13 pm
I think that Spencer will start the season as the first string center, barring injury.  But it takes time to learn a new, complicated system, and Tice probably feels that there is no reason to put him in a situation right now where he is almost certain to fail.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 16, 2011, 04:03:20 pm
I see that our former 2nd round pick Tank Johnson got cut by the Bengals.

Wonder if he winds up getting a 2nd look here since we seem to be interested in any D-Lineman willing to make a trip to Halas Hall right now...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 16, 2011, 05:04:09 pm
I see that our former 2nd round pick Tank Johnson got cut by the Bengals.

Wonder if he winds up getting a 2nd look here since we seem to be interested in any D-Lineman willing to make a trip to Halas Hall right now...

Hadn't your heard?  Bears will be running a 7-2-2 with 5 DTs, 2 DEs, Urlacher, Briggs, Tillman and Wright.

Unlike our offense with Martz, defense will fit the scheme to the personnel.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 16, 2011, 05:09:37 pm
Hadn't your heard?  Bears will be running a 7-2-2 with 5 DTs, 2 DEs, Urlacher, Briggs, Tillman and Wright.

Ya know... that just could work...  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 16, 2011, 05:15:59 pm
That would be real interesting to watch wouldn't it? I'd hope they'd get to the QB pretty darned quickly that way....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 16, 2011, 05:30:24 pm
Better get to him in 1 second or there would be lots of 80 yard TD's. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 17, 2011, 07:51:03 am
Dallas, what's the "vodka network"?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 08:12:15 am
Ground game is where it's at for Bears
Forte, Barber could be effective 1-2 punch
     
 One NFL scout thinks Bears running back Marion Barber will have a big impact this season. Nuccio DiNuzzo/Tribune photo
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
11:10 p.m. CDT, August 16, 2011
BOURBONNAIS — The most hyped free-agent acquisition in training camp has been Roy Williams, but one scout at the first exhibition suggested Marion Barber will have a bigger impact for the Bears this year.

He wasn't taking a swipe at the wide receiver as much as he was noting the fit Barber can be. If his 45-yard effort against the Bills was reflective of how effective he will be, the Bears could have a better 1-2 combination than when Thomas Jones and Cedric Benson shared the backfield.

The key will be for offensive coordinator Mike Martz to pick up where he left off last season. It took some lumps in the first seven games and a come-to-Jesus meeting during the off week for the Bears to figure out what worked and what playbook pages needed to be shredded.

In the final nine games, the offense had more pass attempts than rushes just twice — both losses. Matt Forte took off, finishing with a career-high 1,069 yards. In six of the first seven games, he had 14 carries or less, making you wonder what could have been had the Bears been committed to the ground from the start.

"There is no telling," Forte said.

Coach Lovie Smith hasn't talked about getting off the bus running recently, but that might be the best plan of action. A series of factors add up before you evaluate last season.

The offensive line is clearly better run blocking now than it was at this point a year ago. Mike Tice said in that aspect the new lineup is a half-year ahead of last year's unit. The Bears rushed for 164 yards against the Bills while allowing nine sacks.

The personnel additions and subtractions look to fit a power running game better. Barber and new 6-foot-7, 260-pound tight end Matt Spaeth fit the mold. You can debate Greg Olsen's willingness to block all you want, he wasn't a plus in the run game. Now, 6-7, 267-pound Kellen Davis will have a bigger role.

"It enables you to do a lot of things," tight ends coach Mike DeBord said. "They're so big, they can get on the defensive ends to get outside and they're big where you can run the ball inside. It really enables you to run the ball both ways. We wanted to get a little bit better inside at the point of attack."

How's it all going to work? Pass protection for Jay Cutler must improve. There's no way around it. But if you examine what moves the front office has made, there are more than enough clues to determine the plan now, at least, is for a bigger emphasis on the ground game. Wide receivers will factor more in the passing game with Olsen gone, but the ground game is where it's at.

"That was our identity at the end and that is when we started playing well, when we were running the football," center Roberto Garza said. "Matt and Marion are great runners and with the big tight ends that we have and the line we'll be able to run the football. Obviously, we have to protect Jay as well."

Forte remains confident it will mesh for him and he noted the strength of his position as a whole.

"We can really do a lot of different things in the run game and I think they excel at run blocking because, you know, Chicago Bears football is running the ball," he said. "Being able to pound a defense the entire game takes a lot out of the defense and helps out the passing game as well.

"Coach Martz was just getting here and trying to get everything under his belt at the start of last season. Really, he was just trying to evaluate the talent and how we react to in-game situations. He knew we had a really good quarterback and some receivers. As far as the running game, I don't think he was as confident as we got in it later on in the season."

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 08:15:17 am
Wow! The mad scientist running the ball and using the run to set up the pass? Heresy! But I do agree that we have a line that run blocks very well. Very interesting read.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 08:23:29 am
It's a hell of a lot easier for a DC to scheme against an outdated air scheme like Martz' than it is to scheme against 5 (or 6 or 7) huge blockers and a RB running with bad intentions.

Martz will either adapt his offense to a more ground oriented attack, or our offense will fail again and he'll be out of here after this season.

It seems like kind of a waste to have a QB of Cutler's ability handing the ball off 30 times a game but that may be the only strategy that keeps him healthy until we can get a real OC in here next year who knows how to use his throwing skills better.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 08:25:30 am
Sounds like another project

Addison opens eyes in opener
Undrafted defensive end will get chance with Wootton sidelined
   
By Vaughn McClure, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
August 17, 2011
BOURBONNAIS — When coach Lovie Smith mentioned players earning more practice reps based on their performances in last Saturday's exhibition, most figured the Bears coach was referring to quarterback Nathan Enderle.

Another rookie, however, opened Smith's eyes during the Bears' 10-3 victory over the Bills. Undrafted free-agent Mario Addison, a defensive end from Troy — the same school that produced pass-rush specialist DeMarcus Ware and Osi Umenyiora — found himself running with the second-team defense Monday.

With second-year player Corey Wootton expected to be sidelined a month following arthroscopic knee surgery, Addison has the opportunity to make an even stronger impression.

"I have a chance to step up and fill some shoes,'' Addison said. "It's a chance for me to just play all out.''

Addison's route to the NFL didn't go exactly as planned. The former high school quarterback and running back played linebacker in junior college before excelling as a defensive end. Some projected him as a fifth-round pick until he broke his left hand during Troy's third game at Alabama-Birmingham in Addison's hometown.

"I didn't let that hold me down,'' he said. "The rest of the games, except for the last three, I played with a club. It was a kind of rough, but I still ending the season with 10 1/2 sacks. And I missed a good five or six sacks because I had the club and couldn't grip.''

The 6-foot-3, 252-pound Addison came to grips with the reality of going undrafted and patiently waited for the right opportunity. He leaned on the advice of Ware, who led the NFL with 15 1/2 sacks last season.

"He told me to use my speed,'' Addison said. "Basically he just told me to use my hands and my speed and it would take me a long way.''

Being tutored under defensive line specialist Rod Marinelli could take Addison to another level. As an undrafted free agent, he had choices but said picking the Bears was a no-brainer because of the defensive coordinator.

"It's all about Coach Marinelli,'' Addison said. "He told me one thing that I like. I love playing with my hand in the ground, but other teams wanted me to play 3-4 (outside linebacker). He was like, 'Mario, I don't (care) how much you weigh. If you can rush, you're a rush man. If you can rush, I can clean everything else up.'

"Coach Marinelli made me feel really good about myself.''

And the Bears seem to feel pretty good about Addison's upside moving forward.

vxmcclure@tribune.com

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 08:27:14 am
At 6'3 and 252 thats small for a DE, but then the Bears like guys like that. Wooten has better size.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 08:37:50 am
Bears' Garza a candidate to return to guard if Louis falters
     
By Brad Biggs
 
Tribune reporter
 
8:15 a.m. CDT, August 16, 2011
BOURBONNAIS -- For one snap, the Chicago Bears got a look at one possible alignment for the interior of the offensive line in practice Monday.

During the pass-rushing drills with the defensive line, Chris Spencer moved to center, kicking Roberto Garza over the right guard. It was just one snap -- and Garza handled all of the reps with the first team during team drills -- but it’s a possible formation for the future.

Spencer was signed to a $6 million, two-year contract within hours of negotiations with Olin Kreutz breaking down. But Garza did all of the work with the starters at center during the week in which Spencer couldn’t practice.

The wild card for Spencer is Lance Louis, the third-year guard from San Diego State. He has been having as good of a training camp as any lineman but missed some plays in the preseason opener against the Buffalo Bills. Most of the heat has been on left tackle J’Marcus Webb, but Louis also is in a position where he needs to transfer what he does on the practice fields at Olivet Nazarene University onto the field during a game.

Louis is a nasty brawler with the kind of size the Bears are looking for at 6-3, 320 pounds. He’s in a more critical week than Webb because there are veteran options on the roster if Louis falters. The Bears are less likely to return to Frank Omiyale at left tackle than they are to mix things up inside because Spencer is an experienced pro and former first-round draft pick, and Edwin Williams has also been having a strong camp on the other side backing up Chris Williams at left guard.

Edwin Williams, 6-3, 315, made three starts at right guard during the middle of last season before being sidelined with a back injury and losing the job to the return of Garza.


Based on the way practice went, it’s clear there won’t be any changes in the starting lineup for Monday’s second preseason game at New Meadowlands Stadium against the New York Giants. Typically, starters play into the second quarter. Maybe the Bears will play the starting offensive line the entire first half as they did against the Bills

“I’m more encouraged than I was at this point last year when we were playing musical lines,” line coach Mike Tice said after practice. “We had a handful of guys that played good and I think those guys are evident. We had a couple guys that were on the cusp of playing winning football but didn’t. And then we had some guys that didn’t play well. Again, not to call anyone out. I think everybody knows who those guys are. It was pretty evident. They’re young.”

That, of course, is a reference to Webb and Louis, who the Bears are hoping can be core players moving forward. Tice has a track record for developing late-rounds picks in his career, and general manager Jerry Angelo cited the need to develop young linemen earlier in camp when he was asked about adding veterans to the mix. There simply aren’t attractive options out there right now. NFL teams don’t cut performing linemen in training camp. The Bears made a high-priced bid to sign Willie Colon with the idea of installing him at right guard, but he re-signed with the Pittsburgh Steelers for less money.

“(The young players) need to improve this week and normally from the first preseason game to the second, guys make a big jump and we’re looking for that big jump,” Tice said. “I thought they bounced back today and practiced well. We don’t want to play musical lines right now and we don’t want to hit a panic button because the numbers are what they are. We can make a lot of the numbers. We can say we gave up nine sacks and then we can look at the ones that the line is accountable for and see if it’s possible to correct those things, and I really believe that we can.

“We’re going to work diligently on correcting those things this week and hopefully bounce back and have a great week of practice and carry more of those good practices over to the game. We have one player in particular who has had a great camp and then didn’t carry that over to the game. He needs to carry that over to the game. If we can do that, we’ll get better. We need to get better. In four weeks, we need to be playing winning football across the board, not a handful of guys.”

bmbiggs@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pistol on August 17, 2011, 08:44:35 am
Does anyone have a list of players eligible for the Supplemental draft?

I've seen articles about OT Mike Adams from Ohio St possibly entering it but hadn't seen anything recent. Picking up a beast like Adams would make me feel a lot better about this season and years to come...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 08:55:19 am
Just do it Jerry

Chester Taylor to the Texans might make sense for Bears
BY SEAN JENSEN

August 16, 2011 12:04PM

With a glut of running backs, would the Bears consider trading Chester Taylor to the Houston Texans?

When I heard the Houston Texans lost another running back to injury, I immediately thought of Chester Taylor.


That’s because I remember that Taylor makes his offseason home in Houston.


There’s been a lot of focus on the Bears running back depth chart. Matt Forte is clearly No. 1, but Taylor is not so clearly the backup anymore. The Bears signed Marion Barber to a two-year contract, and he’s definitely looked impressive in training camp, and he had 45 rushing yards on seven carries Saturday night.


In addition, Kahlil Bell played well, and he is something the other three are not: he’s a core member of the special teams.


With Derrick Ward leaving Monday’s game against the New York Jets, it’s fair to wonder if the Texans are looking for running back help. Pro Bowl running back Arian Foster is hurt, along with Ben Tate and Steve Slaton.


Currently, the Texans two healthy backs are Chris Ogbonnaya and Javarris Williams. Ogbonnaya had 17 carries for 37 yards, including a touchdown, and he also caught six passes for 67 yards and one touchdown.


Taylor is due to make $1.25 million this season, and the Bears surely would have to consider taking a late-round draft pick for him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 09:00:35 am
What would we get for Chester Taylor?  A 7th? Maybe a 6th at best?

Still better than nothing though.

More likely the Texans (or some other team) just wait till we cut him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 09:15:34 am
Mike Martz: Bears didn’t draft Nathan Enderle to be No. 3 QB

SEAN JENSEN ON THE BEARS May 4, 2011 10:04PM

Updated: August 6, 2011 12:20AM



Last Friday, when the lockout was temporarily lifted, Bears offensive coordinator Mike Martz reached out and arranged a meeting with his two quarterbacks.

He exchanged voice mails with Jay Cutler and Caleb Hanie, and they planned to meet at Halas Hall.

“But then it changed overnight,” Martz said on Tuesday. “I’m sure they’re as disappointed as we are.”

On Saturday, though, the Bears’ quarterback room got a little more crowded after they selected Nathan Enderle out of Idaho in the fifth round. Matt Gutierrez, who played at Idaho State before signing as an undrafted free agent with the New England Patriots, also is on the Bears’ roster.

“We didn’t draft [Enderle] to be the third quarterback,” Martz said. “If that was the case, then there was no reason to draft a quarterback.

“You have to be good at that position to win, and one just isn’t enough. We feel really good about Caleb, but what if Nate is better? Who knows? I don’t know that he is or isn’t.”

Ultimately, Martz is excited about that competition and many others. Although the offense finished the 2010 season ranked 30th, the Bears played markedly better in the second half of the season and flashed a multidimensional attack.

To that end, Martz — like several others in the organization — couldn’t believe that Wisconsin offensive tackle Gabe Carimi was available toward the end of the first round.

“[Carimi] has too many pluses,” Martz said. “It’s hard to find a nick on him.”

In an interview with the Chicago Sun-Times, Martz alluded to a future beyond 2011, even though his contract expires after the upcoming season.

So what are his plans?

Feelings about the future

The Sun-Times reported last week that Martz turned down a contract extension from the Bears, but he downplayed any hard feelings toward the organization.

“I have a representative in Bob LaMonte who’s the best at what he does,” Martz said. “I just do whatever he tells me to.

“He doesn’t tell me how to coach, and I don’t tell him how to negotiate. But he knows how badly I want to be here, and I would like an extension. I don’t worry about it. I’m sure it’ll work out.”

Asked why he was so confident, Martz gushed about the 2010 season.

“It was as much fun as I’ve had in coaching in many years, and the reason why is Lovie [Smith] makes it fun,” said Martz, who was out of football in 2009 and coached with the Detroit Lions and San Francisco 49ers before that. “He’s a terrific head coach. He provides great leadership, and he lets you do your job.”


Martz also has enjoyed working with quarterbacks coach Shane Day and all the offensive players.

And Martz acknowledged that he welcomes a chance to develop young quarterbacks, which is why he’s encouraged by what he has seen from Enderle. Player personnel director Tim Ruskell had scouted him when he was with the Seattle Seahawks, and he recommended that Day and Martz take a look.

“He was very, very impressive,” Martz said. “I thought if we had a chance to take one in that area — middle to later rounds — this is a guy I’d want to see in person.”

So Martz personally visited only one rookie quarterback.

“If you’re going to travel to Moscow, Idaho,” Martz said, “you got to have a feeling that there’s pretty good support for him in the building.”

Enderle’s statistics weren’t overwhelming, but Martz noted how many weapons the Vandals lost heading into his senior season. So instead of just dwelling on completion percentage, Martz looked at how Enderle recognized what a defense was trying to do and how he reacted.

“You have to sort through the garbage,’’ Martz said. ‘‘They were overmatched in a lot of games. When you look at those tapes, he may or may not have good numbers. But you have to take some of that with a grain of salt.

“The thing that was impressive, against those [top] teams, he stood in there and tried to make a play. He played as if he belonged there, regardless of what’s around him.”

Cutler knows no ceiling

But for all the potential he sees in Enderle and Hanie, Martz knows Cutler is going to be key to the Bears’ offense in 2011.

Martz knew before they worked together that Cutler was a tough player. But he marveled at the abuse he endured and how he bounced back.

“He’s resilient,’’ Martz said. ‘‘He’s going to pop back up [after a hit]. And he really adjusts very well in games.”

Asked if he has abandoned a passing philosophy that — with Kurt Warner and Marc Bulger — emphasized throwing to spots and timing-based routes, Martz said, “We never left that. That’s what the system is.”

But Martz said the way defenses approached his offense forced them to deviate from that.

“That’s probably the best way to put it,” Martz said.

“But [Cutler] has no problem with that at all. It’s not something he can’t do. But we leaned on the running game.”

Martz said it’s unfair to compare the Bears’ offense to the one he engineered in St. Louis, which was consistently among the league’s best.

“We were on a fast track, indoors, and we had a litany of receivers,” Martz said. “One gets injured, and we’d trot another one out there.

“[The Bears’ receivers are] good, but we’re not as deep.”

As he always has done, Martz heaped praise on Cutler.

“Jay is very special,” Martz said. “He hasn’t even touched on what he can be yet. I know he feels good about where he is as a player, but I’m not even sure he knows how good he could be.

“To me, he could be the very best in the league right now. Absolutely. We just have to get him there.

‘‘There are some things we need to clean up. But he’s on his way.”

Part of that, Martz said, is to continue to get a handle on the personnel around him.

“We’re learning a lot about our guys,” he said, “and what we can do and can’t do.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 09:23:04 am
How good can Amobi Okoye be for the Bears?
BY SEAN JENSEN sjensen@suntimes.com August 15, 2011 11:48AM

August 15, 2011 1:42PM



Amobi Okoye looked like a top-10 player in the Bears’ first pre-season game on Saturday night.


The former Houston Texans first-round pick had both of the Bears sacks, and he also had several other pressures.


But remember this: Okoye was facing backups of the Buffalo Bills, a club that went 4-12 last season.


That’s not to dismiss his performance; Okoye should produce like that.


But he’s used to facing very good players, since he has 58 NFL starts under his belt.


How good can Okoye be?


It’s hard to say at this point, since he’s also stood out at Bears training camp. But, again, he’s generally not facing the starting offensive linemen.


But this is a start, and he’s fired up about being a Bear and working with defensive line coach/ defensive coordinator Rod Marinelli.


“I can’t wait until the regular season gets here,” he said. “Being a Bear felt good. Real good.”


Okoye talked about the “trial” of having the Texans tell him that they were shopping him before eventually releasing him altogether.



“It was a trial period for me, but that’s the thing about football,” he said. “Football is like no other sport. When you get knocked down, you have to get back up.


“That’s what you have to do, and that’s why I love the game.”


Okoye, 24, couldn’t be happier to work with Marinelli.


“Man, Rod is a great, great coach. There’s a lot of things I’ve already gathered from him, through the two weeks that I’ve been here,” he said. “I’m glad I have this opportunity.”


But the defense still doesn’t feel natural to him.


“I haven’t even got it down all the way. I was in a system for four years,” he said of the Texans. “I still have old habits with the old system. I would say I’m only probably halfway through, as far as the mentality you have to have to be in this system. I can’t wait until I get it all down.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 09:25:17 am
What would we get for Chester Taylor?  A 7th? Maybe a 6th at best?

Still better than nothing though.

More likely the Texans (or some other team) just wait till we cut him.

Thats what I would say, a 6th or 7th which isnt as bad as just cutting the guy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on August 17, 2011, 09:31:05 am
All the Texans need to do is throw in a bag of chips and six-pack would be a win-win trade for both teams..... :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 09:37:33 am
NFL delays supplemental draftEmail Print Comments466 ESPN.com news services

Adam Schefter
NEW YORK -- The NFL supplemental draft originally scheduled for Wednesday has been postponed.

NFL spokesman Michael Signora confirmed Tuesday that the draft will not be held as planned and that teams have been told a new date has not yet been set.


Signora did not say whether former Ohio State quarterback Terrelle Pryor would be available for selection.


Pryor was seeking a meeting with commissioner Roger Goodell to make a case for being declared eligible, sources told ESPN senior NFL analyst Chris Mortensen on Sunday. Goodell was reviewing the facts of Pryor's case.


The rules that govern eligibility for the supplemental draft state simply, "To be eligible for a supplemental draft, a player's petition for special eligibility must be approved by the League office and his name promulgated to clubs."


Mortensen reported on Monday that the lawyer representing Pryor's petition for draft eligibility said Pryor told the NCAA in May about additional violations he committed while playing for the Buckeyes.


David Cornwell, Pryor's attorney, told Mortensen that Pryor admitted his mentor, Ted Sarniak, gave him and his mother cash and helped with car payments.


After a 2008 NCAA investigation into Pryor's recruitment, Sarniak, a family friend, was told he could no longer give Pryor money or gifts. Cornwell said he believes the violation makes Pryor eligible for the NFL's supplemental draft, since it would have affected Pryor's 2011 eligibility.


Ohio State is still under NCAA investigation, and Sarniak's payments have not been addressed publicly.


ESPN was unable to reach an Ohio State spokesman for comment.


When he announced his departure from Ohio State, Pryor already had been suspended by the school and the NCAA for the first five games of what would have been his senior season this fall for accepting improper benefits, such as cash and discounted tattoos.


The scandal led to coach Jim Tressel's forced resignation May 30. Tressel acknowledged knowing his players were taking improper benefits but covered it up for more than nine months before Ohio State officials discovered the violations.


Pryor is Ohio State's all-time leading rusher among quarterbacks, with 2,164 yards. He also threw 57 touchdown passes, tying a school record.


The eligible players so far are former Georgia running back Caleb King, former Northern Illinois safety Tracy Wilson, former Western Carolina cornerback Torez Jones, former Lindenwood University defensive end Keenan Mace, and former North Carolina defensive end Michael McAdoo.

Information from ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter, ESPN senior NFL analyst Chris Mortensen and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 09:54:34 am
Maybe we can trade Taylor to the Texans for Danieal Manning, LOL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 10:06:12 am
That would be a gas.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 17, 2011, 10:06:47 am
“We didn’t draft [Enderle] to be the third quarterback,” Martz said. “If that was the case, then there was no reason to draft a quarterback.

“You have to be good at that position to win, and one just isn’t enough. We feel really good about Caleb, but what if Nate is better? Who knows? I don’t know that he is or isn’t.”


This coming from a guy who thought the Bears had a better chance of winning in the NFC championship game with Todd Collins over Caleb Hanie. 

No way in hell Hanie signs with the Bears next year...not while Martz is here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 17, 2011, 10:10:31 am
"high-priced bid to sign Willie Colon with the idea of installing him at right guard"   

Isnt Colon a T?  Probably why he didnt sign with the Bears for more $.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 10:14:06 am
I don’t know that he is or isn’t

How long would it take to see that? 5 minutes?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 10:18:13 am
This coming from a guy who thought the Bears had a better chance of winning in the NFC championship game with Todd Collins over Caleb Hanie. 

No way in hell Hanie signs with the Bears next year...not while Martz is here.

I don't think Martz is gonna be here next year.  Just a gut feeling.

As for Hanie, he may be one of those kids doomed to a Kyle Orton type career. He'll either be a career backup or, if he ever does get a chance to start, it will be on a team that's desperate and he'll be constantly looking over his shoulder as they try to upgrade him.  He's good enough to win a starting spot somewhere (or at the minimum, compete for it)... but I'm not sure he'll be able to keep it long-term.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 10:19:30 am
"high-priced bid to sign Willie Colon with the idea of installing him at right guard"   

Isnt Colon a T?  Probably why he didnt sign with the Bears for more $.

Yes Colon is a tackle. I wondered if anybody would catch that. And install him at RG and not tackle.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 17, 2011, 10:32:10 am
"high-priced bid to sign Willie Colon with the idea of installing him at right guard"   

Isnt Colon a T?  Probably why he didnt sign with the Bears for more $.

True.  Also may have wanted to return to the team that drafted him.  Plus its the Steelers who have a very good chance of going back to the Super Bowl in 2011.

Its not always about the money for some NFL players...though most of the time it is.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on August 17, 2011, 11:11:41 am
Flozell is still available...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 12:14:39 pm
Flozell is still available...

I just dont see them going after him. I think thats another guy on his last leg
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 12:21:09 pm
I think Flozell would give us about as much as Orlando Pace did the year he was here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 01:42:28 pm
Yup and dummy here couldnt remember Pace's name
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 17, 2011, 01:49:43 pm
http://hqplayer.nbcsports.com/Player.html?PID=44

PFTalk interviews Mullen about the Bears.  The most interesting thing I got from it was Mullen says the Bears have offered Forte a larger contract then Jamaal Charles got and Forte turned it down because he wants more.  He says if Forte does not come to his senses the Bears can simply let him play out his contract then put the franchise tag on him next year.  He says the franchise tag will cost them less then what they would pay him if Forte accepted the contract offer they gave him.

Bears hold all the cards he says.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 01:59:03 pm
Matt Forte is possibly my favorite Bear and I really want him to get paid, but at the same time he'd best not overplay his hand.

He is a very good RB but not one I would put in the "elite" class. If the Bears have offered him a better contract than Jamaal Charles that seems more than fair... especially now that it appears we have a decent run-blocking OL to put in front of him. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 02:03:37 pm
Thats a shame.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 17, 2011, 02:04:56 pm
Charles signed for five-years, $32.5 million deal with $13 million guaranteed (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5909051). 

DeAngelo Williams signed a five-year contract worth $43 million with $21 million guaranteed (http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2011/7/27/2297822/deangelo-williams-contract-carolina-panthers-free-agency).

Those are measuring sticks in the negotiations.  Mullen is absolutely right.  The Bears do hold all the cards.  Tough deal for a class act like Forte.  But any running back, including Chris Johnson, hold little leverage in contract extensions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 02:09:26 pm
I like Forte too. I was so happy the Bears drafted him. I had seen him in the Senior Bowl and thought he was a quality back, but not elite. Somebody sure is giving him bad advice
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 17, 2011, 02:18:05 pm
And the Bears handed Benson $17 million guaranteed (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2145521).  I'm pretty sure somebody reminded Jerry.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 02:18:20 pm
Forte's agent is probably holding out for DeAngelo Williams' deal.  I'm not sure Forte is quite in DeAngelo's league and in any event DeAngelo got overpaid so they might as well give up on that idea right now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 17, 2011, 02:24:18 pm
The DeAngelo deal really fuucked up the market.  CJ is looking for a 5 year $58 mil with maybe mid $20 guaranteed. 

I still have a feeling that a deal will get struck.  Forte just seems a little smarter and forward thinking than some other players in the league.  We'll see.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 02:38:51 pm
It's not like Forte would be missing a lot by not playing much this preseason. He's familiar with the offense and by all accounts he's in excellent condition so there's really no reason to put a lot of mileage on him until the games count.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 17, 2011, 03:35:31 pm

Payton rarely got any carries in the preseason...Forte doesn't need many either.

I am not at all into Fantasy Football but I watched  a segment on NFLN where they ranked players at different positions.  Forte didn't even show up in the top 10 list for HBs.  The only Bear to show up in a top list was the defense/STs and it was 5th. 

I'd take Forte over DeAngelo Williams though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 04:00:18 pm
DeAngelo Williams is a better pure runner than Forte -- by quite a bit.

But Forte is the better-rounded player in terms of hurting a D via ground or air. 

Kinda surprised Forte gets so little love from the fantasy "experts". It must be the fact that he's not very good on the goal line and in the fantasy leagues TD production is everything.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 17, 2011, 04:01:48 pm
That and the Bears offense is not very good which means fewer opportunity's to score.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 04:02:43 pm
That and the Bears offense is not very good which means fewer opportunity's to score.

Excellent point.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 04:22:45 pm
The DeAngelo deal really fuucked up the market.  CJ is looking for a 5 year $58 mil with maybe mid $20 guaranteed. 

I still have a feeling that a deal will get struck.  Forte just seems a little smarter and forward thinking than some other players in the league.  We'll see.

I sure hope so, but if one cant get done and Forte is stupid enough to sit the season out, I think our RB situation is in good hands with Barber and Co.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 17, 2011, 04:29:23 pm
I wouldn't bank too heavily on Barber. If we can keep his carries down he'll be a great change of pace back for us but I don't think he has enough tread left on the tires to be the bell cow. 

As for Kahlil Bell, he had a nice outing against the Bills but he's got to play like that consistently, when the games count.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 17, 2011, 09:34:50 pm
http://www.csnchicago.com/08/17/11/Mullin-Reasons-why-Bears-will-win-NFC-No/landing_insider_mullin_loud3r.html?blockID=550196&feedID=626

I agree with this article.  In fact I felt this way before I read it.  Of course the O-line has to improve to make it happen though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 17, 2011, 10:15:10 pm
I havent seen or heard a blurb about Fantuz. Nada, zip, zero.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 17, 2011, 10:17:03 pm
The 46 is guzzling that koolaid too. Why not? The Bears got bigger up front, (with hopefully no drop in speed), got a killer o lineman and a seemingly healthy Marion Barber who when healthy is an absolute monster running back.  I'm good to go in the new digs, got the dish back and got the nfl ticket for free.  Its time.  Still debating about the Titian-Bear preseason game, I assume that attendance will be up because of the way Tn played and Cutler's Nashville ties, but have no desire to sit and Broil waiting for the sun to go down. Also, just closed on the home, really haven't got the cash. I think I'll just sit in Spring Hill and hope for no Bear injuries.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 17, 2011, 10:25:26 pm
From what I read Fantuz is not standing out.  It looks like Dane Sanzenbacher is stealing the show among the no name receivers.  Cutler says he could be a mini-Wes Welker for the Bears.  If any of them make the team it will be him.

We know they will keep: Roy Williams, Devin Hester, Edgar Bennett, Johnny Knox, Sam Hurd, which leaves only one spot.  I think Sanzenbacher has the lead for that last WR job right now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 18, 2011, 01:04:27 am
“We didn’t draft [Enderle] to be the third quarterback,” Martz said. “If that was the case, then there was no reason to draft a quarterback.

“You have to be good at that position to win, and one just isn’t enough. We feel really good about Caleb, but what if Nate is better? Who knows? I don’t know that he is or isn’t.”


This coming from a guy who thought the Bears had a better chance of winning in the NFC championship game with Todd Collins over Caleb Hanie. 

No way in hell Hanie signs with the Bears next year...not while Martz is here.

AMEN!!!!!

He didn't like Olsen, doesn't like Knox, and now he's trying to run Hanie outta here for some strange reason!   Martz is a fool!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 18, 2011, 05:58:29 am
I will give Hanie a chance he didn't get with Martz and the Bears last year.  But just like the Packers aren't likely to cut ties with Rodgers to go with Flynn, let's not give Hanie a pass.  Flynn almost beat the Patriots, but I think given some time and some film, defenses would play him better. 

Hanie needs to show that he is the number 2 now.  He needs to go out and perform in the preseason.  He had a nice half of football in an emergency session, and almost pulled out the win.  I am pulling for him, but he needs to prove it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 18, 2011, 06:58:57 am
Not drinking the Koolaid just yet. Recievers are still a work in progress,the Oline is still a work in progress,the Dline still is a work in progress. And our Division is strong. The Vikings appear to be the weakest link. Detroit could make the playoffs this season and Green Bay's gonna be in it. But as usual alot of things need to go right for the Bears to be in it and one of the biggest factors will be health. We've got older guys, KEY older guys on Defense that if one or two go down (Urlacher! ) we're screwed. We're a bit more resilient at QB and RB and on the Dline, but LB's, Secondary especially and reciever are areas we aren't exactly real deep at.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 08:19:33 am
With Fantuz not distinguishing himself and Olsen gone, the signing of Roy Williams as a hedge at the big WR spot is looking like a smart move. If Roy and Cutler can develop some chemistry that will advance this offense by quite a ways.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 18, 2011, 09:24:49 am
Who was that tall, skinny UDFA rookie who was grabbing all the passes in the second half?  It was like he was catching them and Sanzenbacher wasnt getting thrown to at all. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 18, 2011, 09:28:34 am
Kris Adams.  It looked like Enderle was focused on him every play.  But he was getting open and making the catch.  He is probably a practice squad candidate.

We can't stash Sanzenbacher there unless they think he can't play.  Way too many other teams were interested and he will be snatched up immediately.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 18, 2011, 09:31:30 am
likely Sanch ws running with the 2's and Adams with the 3's so Enderle had a little comfort with him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 09:44:16 am
Kris Adams - 6'3 195 out of Texas-El Paso.

Could use another 10-15 lbs but you're right, an ideal PS candidate.

Speaking of WRs, I asked my brother in Mpls how two of the Bears castoffs (Aromashadu and Iglesias) were faring with the Vikings this preseason. He said he thinks Aromashadu has about a 50-50 chance to make the team, while Iglesias has been getting hardly any training camp reps and will likely be an early cut.   

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 18, 2011, 09:46:40 am
Adams, that was it.  He just looked skinny as a rail.  But he was catching the ball.  Cant argue with that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on August 18, 2011, 09:56:26 am
He did a great job for the Steelers last year, from everything I've read. They want him back, but at a lower cap number than what he wants from them.

Only thing is...he's known for being more of a run blocker than a pass blocker...which doesn't do a lot for us...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 18, 2011, 10:18:41 am
Dave, are you talking about Spaeth?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 18, 2011, 10:19:49 am
With Fantuz not distinguishing himself and Olsen gone, the signing of Roy Williams as a hedge at the big WR spot is looking like a smart move. If Roy and Cutler can develop some chemistry that will advance this offense by quite a ways.

Agreed, but all the chemistry will do no good unless the OLine can give Cutler enough time to get the ball to him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 10:22:26 am
Dave, are you talking about Spaeth?

Or Flozell Adams?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 18, 2011, 10:24:05 am
Its hard to develop a passing game without enough protection.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on August 18, 2011, 10:24:55 am
I was talking about Flozell...I replied to the earlier posts without noticing that there were 2 more pages of posts afterwards...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 18, 2011, 10:25:36 am
He has to be talking about Spaeth because Flozell Adams was a Cowboy, right?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 10:36:36 am
Flozell played the bulk of a [very solid] career for the Cowboys, but IIRC they let him go and he played for the Steelers last year.

According to Angelo in this article, the Bears are going with the O-Linemen currently on the roster...  no plans to go after a veteran FA. 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-angelo-addresses-bears-offensive-approach-martzs-motivational-methods-fortes-contract-20110818,0,2258450.story

God help Jay Cutler.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 18, 2011, 10:39:05 am
Bears had 5 WRs last year:  Knox, Hester, Bennett, Aroma, and Davis.  Aroma and Davis are gone and we've added RoyW and Hurd.  If the Bears stick with 5 WRs then Sanzenbacher is out.  Too early to tell if the Bears will consider adding a 6th opening to accomodate Sanzebacher or Kris Adams.  Another less likely option would be one of the guys taking Hurd's spot.

I don't see any relationship between the signing of Roy Williams and the release of Greg Olsen.  It's comical to see posts touting Roy William's size and blocking ability to compensate for the loss of Olsen.  Bears needed to get bigger at WR regardless of what's going on at TE. 

We probably had two of the quickest/fastest least physical WRs last year in Hester and Knox and the Packers just took them entirely out of their game....twice.  Roy Williams and possibly Hurd MAY bring another element to our smallish wideouts....SIZE.   

And why are the Bears talking about Knox having to compete with Roy Williams?  Why isn't Roy Williams starting WITH Johnny Knox.  Right now it looks to me that Williams and Hester are the starters.  Unbelievable.  I love Hester as a punt returner and he's pretty good returning kicks too, but he has not shown to be a reliable consistent wide receiver.

Start Knox with Williams.  One lines up on the LOS and one lines up a foot behind the LOS - what's the big difference?  And don't say that Hester is a more physical blocker or better over the middle than Knox - he's not.

Put your two best WRs on the field at the same time.  Would the Cowboys bench Dez Bryant because he plays the same position as Miles Austin? 

In fact, I'd bring in Bennett before I'd bring in Hester.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 10:41:50 am
I think it's highly debatable that Knox is one of our two best WRs.

If you're going to apply that criteria than our two starters should be Roy Williams and Earl Bennett even though that gives us precious little downfield capability.  Hester is no more than the 4th best WR and should be used very sparingly on offense but deployed on every possible return opportunity. Knox should be our #3 but with that being said we should be running a lot of 3 WR sets in order to keep the D from cheating everything up towards the LOS. 

If Williams, Bennett and Knox are on the field for an appreciable amount of the offensive snaps...  and Cutler gets protection...  I don't see how our offense can go too far wrong assuming Martz calls a sensible balance between run and pass.  By getting rid of Olsen, Martz also got rid of the "obligation" (real or perceived) to target his TEs in the passing game so there should be plenty of balls to go around to those three. With Hester inserted very occasionally in 4 WR sets just to make the opposing DC nervous. 

Good point on Sanzebecher or Kris Adams needing to bump off Hurd to win a roster spot and that's going to come down 100% to what they do on STs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 18, 2011, 10:43:21 am
Flozell Adams played RT for the Steelers last year after playing many years at LT for the Cowboys.

We have a RT...actually we might have 2 or 3 capable RTs.  It's LT that is the concern.  BTW Flozell is 35 maybe 36 years old.

Assuming Carimi can hold down RT the key to the Bears O-line successs is Webb at LT.  They have some options at C/RG with Spencer, Garza and Louis.  Although I'm still not sold on Chris Williams at LG - he appears to be holding down the fort.

Monday night will be interesting. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 18, 2011, 10:54:17 am
I think it's highly debatable that Knox is one of our two best WRs.

If you're going to apply that criteria than our two starters should be Roy Williams and Earl Bennett even though that gives us precious little downfield capability.  Hester is no more than the 4th best WR and should be used very sparingly on offense but deployed on every possible return opportunity. Knox should be our #3 but with that being said we should be running a lot of 3 WR sets in order to keep the D from cheating everything up towards the LOS.

Good point on Sanzebecher or Kris Adams needing to bump off Hurd to win a roster spot and that's going to come down 100% to what they do on STs.

I think its highly debatable that Roy Williams is one of our two best WRs.  He was the 4th or 5th option in the Cowboys pass offfense last year.

Knox is raw and has flaws but he has only 2 years in the league and has potential to get better.  It would be a waste to see him spending too much time on the bench.  We'll need his speed to put more pressure on a defense especially with our TEs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 18, 2011, 10:56:31 am
Monday night will be interesting.

It sure seems that way. A repeat of the debacle in the Medowlands will shake the house down.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 18, 2011, 10:59:38 am
I think its highly debatable that Roy Williams is one of our two best WRs.

I agree especially since he hasnt even cought the ball in a game yet for the Bears. And if the OLine doesnt improve he might not do anything but be a decoy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 18, 2011, 11:02:37 am
Actually I read an article where the coaches said after reviewing film last year they felt Hester and Bennet were their most consistent receivers.  Which means Knox is the guy they felt needed upgraded.  Also I saw a stat where there where more interceptions from passes thrown to Knox then any other receiver in the NFL and by a large margin.

Knox while fast simply was not where he was supposed to be way to often.  They feel Williams knows the system and has had success in it before.  Plus he is a big receiver.

Hopefully Knox works at it and gets better.  It sounds like so far that is what he plans to do.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 11:07:36 am
Actually I read an article where the coaches said after reviewing film last year they felt Hester and Bennet were their most consistent receivers.  Which means Knox is the guy they felt needed upgraded.  Also I saw a stat where there where more interceptions from passes thrown to Knox then any other receiver in the NFL and by a large margin.

Knox while fast simply was not where he was supposed to be way to often.  They feel Williams knows the system and has had success in it before.  Plus he is a big receiver.

Hopefully Knox works at it and gets better.  It sounds like so far that is what he plans to do.

Reportedly Knox showed up to camp in terrific shape, and with 15 lbs more muscle than he carried last year. So yeah, that's a good start.

Our WRs coach is below average, so who knows if Knox will ever reach his full potential. But it certainly sounds like Knox is doing his part anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 18, 2011, 11:17:20 am
Reportedly Knox showed up to camp in terrific shape, and with 15 lbs more muscle than he carried last year. So yeah, that's a good start.

Our WRs coach is below average, so who knows if Knox will ever reach his full potential. But it certainly sounds like Knox is doing his part anyway.

Come on Yapper, the mighty Darryl Drake?????
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 18, 2011, 11:20:52 am
Actually I read an article where the coaches said after reviewing film last year they felt Hester and Bennet were their most consistent receivers.  Which means Knox is the guy they felt needed upgraded.  Also I saw a stat where there where more interceptions from passes thrown to Knox then any other receiver in the NFL and by a large margin.

Knox while fast simply was not where he was supposed to be way to often.  They feel Williams knows the system and has had success in it before.  Plus he is a big receiver.

Hopefully Knox works at it and gets better.  It sounds like so far that is what he plans to do.

Bears felt that Knox was their #1 option last year and fed alot of their pass offense through him.  He probably led the team in passes directed to him and was tied with team lead with Forte with most catches at 51.

Now some of those picks were a result of Knox not completing his routes or not being able to outfight the defender for a jump ball, but a good number of those picks were due to Cutler forcing a ball into a tight spot (and not just checking down to Forte) or his line pressurring Cutler into a bad throw.

Is Knox a legit #1 receiver.  Nope.   He's probably a #2.  That's why I am advocating playing him  WITH Roy Williams not being replaced by Roy Williams.

Knox, despite his flaws was one of the league leaders in yards per catch at around 19 yards.   Nobody else on the Bears was even close (Hester and Bennet were near 12).  Roy averaged about 14.  Also he and Olsen led the team with 5 TDs.  Olsen's gone and now we want to bench Knox.

As for Hester, he absolutely disappeared in some games.  And for someone who only caught 40 balls he was in the NFLs top 25 list for most drops.

If Knox can't start with Williams I'd prefer Bennett over Hester.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 11:41:48 am
As for Hester, he absolutely disappeared in some games.  And for someone who only caught 40 balls he was in the NFLs top 25 list for most drops.

I was especially disappointed in what Hester did (or more accurately, didn't) do in the NFC Championship game.  Granted he didn't get a lot of help from Cutler but there were plays he had a chance to make -- that could have materially turned the outcome of the game -- and he didn't get it done.  Definitely not what a supposed "#1" WR is supposed to bring to the table.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 18, 2011, 11:46:06 am

Bears didn't have a #1 WR last year and they still don't.

Should have went after Sidney Rice...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 11:47:49 am
Sidney Rice and Roy Williams (the Detroit version, not the Dallas version), are essentially the same player.

With Tavares Jackson slinging the ball in Seattle I don't see Sidney Rice putting up huge numbers up there this year.  The Seachickens will be murder to defend in the red zone, though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 18, 2011, 12:17:48 pm
In a system like ours, the quarterback has to KNOW that the WR will be in the exact spot he is throwing to.  The ball is often thrown beforeor as the receiver makes his cut.  If the receiver cuts his route short, the quarterback is just tossing to ball to the nearest DB, which happened a lot last year.  Looks like Cutler's fault, but isn't.

The rap on Knox is that he cuts his routes short.  That is something that all the speed in the world will not make up for.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 18, 2011, 01:01:22 pm

I stated that Knox was at fault for some of the picks...but don't absolve Cutler or the offensive line of guilt.

Last year was Knox' second in the league and first under Martz' system.  I'll cut him some slack.

A good coach can correct his route running.  But you can't coach speed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 01:09:27 pm
I would like to think Knox is still acclimating to the speed and physicality of the NFL game.  It's quite a transition from outrunning every CB in sight at Abilene Christian to having a future HOF CB (Charles Woodson) draped all over you.  We saw Danieal Manning (also from Abilene Christian) struggle similarly although Knox arguably has developed far faster than Manning.

This is a pivotal year for Knox...  his 3rd in the league (which is when a lot of players tend to break out), and his 2nd in the same system.  I think this is the year he either takes it to the next level or pretty much plateaus at where he is now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on August 18, 2011, 01:19:45 pm
I think Knox is fired up, with the feeling that Roy Williams was brought in to replace him has upped his game accordingly....

Roy better up his game as well, or he'll find himself on the bench and Knox in his place....

When was the last time we've seen this much supposed "angst" in preseason and training camp under the Angelo/Lovie regime ?

This may be a good thing for the Bears this season.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 01:50:37 pm
When was the last time we've seen this much supposed "angst" in preseason and training camp under the Angelo/Lovie regime ?

Hopefully it means Angelo and Lovie are feeling the pressure as well.  The last few years it certainly appeared they could not have cared less.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 18, 2011, 01:58:58 pm
I was especially disappointed in what Hester did (or more accurately, didn't) do in the NFC Championship game.  Granted he didn't get a lot of help from Cutler but there were plays he had a chance to make -- that could have materially turned the outcome of the game -- and he didn't get it done.  Definitely not what a supposed "#1" WR is supposed to bring to the table.

If I recall Cutler OVERTHREW Hester on a couple of passes that could've either resulted in big gains or TD's in the NFC Championship game.  But of course you're blaming Hester for it.

Not surprised. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 18, 2011, 02:04:46 pm
Hopefully it means Angelo and Lovie are feeling the pressure as well.  The last few years it certainly appeared they could not have cared less.

Why should they?  The Bears played in the NFC championship game last year. " The plan" is working.  They just need to take the next step.

The number one receiver admits  he's not quite in shape yet (http://www.csnchicago.com/08/18/11/Williams-among-Bears-offensive-problems/landing_moon_v3.html?blockID=550554&feedID=3769).  Johnny Knox was the leading receiver last year, gained 15 lbs of muscle after working hard in the offseason...and he gets benched.  The starting left tackle admits he didn't match the intensity of the opponent during the game.  Shoot, the sky is the limit with this offense!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 02:09:22 pm
The starting left tackle admits he didn't match the intensity of the opponent during the game. 

And that right there is why J'Marcus Webb...  who had enough athletic ability to get recruited by the University of Texas...  wound up playing at Backwater U.

If J'Marcus had Gabe Carimi's intangibles, he would have been a 1st round draft pick from the U. of Texas and possibly a Pro Bowler in his rookie season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on August 18, 2011, 02:17:07 pm
So we should be happy with 56? So getting sacked 56 times is acceptable? I dont think so.

WOW.  WTF?  Way to read too much into posts and put words into other peoples mouthes.

I was just pointing out the abusurdity of the statement that last years line was the worst in NFL history.

Nothing more.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 18, 2011, 02:26:11 pm
And that right there is why J'Marcus Webb...  who had enough athletic ability to get recruited by the University of Texas...  wound up playing at Backwater U.

If J'Marcus had Gabe Carimi's intangibles, he would have been a 1st round draft pick from the U. of Texas and possibly a Pro Bowler in his rookie season.

He had acedemic problems and transferred to a junior college and then went on to Backwater U.  (W. Texas A&M).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 18, 2011, 02:27:49 pm
I would like to think Knox is still acclimating to the speed and physicality of the NFL game.  It's quite a transition from outrunning every CB in sight at Abilene Christian to having a future HOF CB (Charles Woodson) draped all over you.  We saw Danieal Manning (also from Abilene Christian) struggle similarly although Knox arguably has developed far faster than Manning.

This is a pivotal year for Knox...  his 3rd in the league (which is when a lot of players tend to break out), and his 2nd in the same system.  I think this is the year he either takes it to the next level or pretty much plateaus at where he is now.

Well if he isnt on the field much he isnt just going to level off. Like Dallas says he is the 2nd leading receiver and you are going to sit him unless the feared Roy Williams is hurt or winded? I'd say anybody stupid enough to sit him is asking for a dropoff in pass receptions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 02:41:06 pm
Like I said before, the trio of Williams, Bennett and Knox appears on paper at least to give Cutler the full complement of targets he needs for any given play.       

- Williams the big rangy security blanket and red zone threat

- Bennett the savvy intermediate guy

- And Knox the deep threat

I wouldn't be surprised if they are all on the field for at least 70% of all the offensive snaps.  3 WR "core" sets are not that radical in today's NFL and especially in a Martz system.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 18, 2011, 02:44:27 pm
Hester caught 40 balls last year as the 3rd receiver, Johnny will get time as well.
If he takes advantage he might get even more opportunities.

Knox lining up against a NB is likely a good thing for us.
they will want to roll safety help over top of Hester.
Do they use the other safety to help the CB cover Williams or Knox?

It should also really open the field for Forte to catch some passes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 18, 2011, 02:45:52 pm
I have no problems with that lineup.  But it appears to me that Hester is part of the equation and Knox is not.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 18, 2011, 02:50:13 pm
I suspect Knox is still going to get quite a bit of playing time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 18, 2011, 02:54:23 pm
yeah, based on what the staff is saying I would go Williams,Knox, Hester.
If Hester is gassed from a return I would put Bennett in Hester's spot.
If it is third and reasonable I might put Bennett in Knox's slot spot.

Martz can move the guys around that are the most comfortable with the O. I expect Bennett has it down by now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 03:06:29 pm
If there's a catch we absolutely have to have, and it's a choice between Bennett on the field or Hester, I want Bennett on the field 11 times out of 10.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 18, 2011, 03:08:04 pm
I agree.  Bennett is our best receiver period.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 18, 2011, 04:35:10 pm
Well, at least he's admitting it:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/18/roy-williams-says-hes-not-in-shape/

Still, you'd like to see the veteran FA pickups setting a better example.  Knox came into camp cut, buff and hungry. Williams, apparently, not so much.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 18, 2011, 05:19:33 pm
I wasn't at all thrilled to see Williams added to the team. My thinking is he'll be a one year flop and they'll find someone to replace him next season. They need to keep Sanzenbacher. 21 other teams were interested in the kid. That should def say something. We need a reliable guy who can go out and get the 4/5/6 yard balls to keep the chains moving.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wizard61 on August 18, 2011, 06:42:55 pm
Yeah, running up hillsdid nothing for that Payton guy. What an idiot. Well, intellect is not what a WR needs. But then, being smart enough to show up in shape would have helped.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 18, 2011, 08:50:58 pm
The thing that bugs me is that Williams and Knox play the same position. So unless they move Knox to a different position and he learns that position then Knox and Williams wont be on the field together and Knox wont be getting the reps.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on August 18, 2011, 10:38:25 pm
Webb = Turn style at the L.

You guys pay for that?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 19, 2011, 12:13:27 am

Who besides Matthews do our tackles have to be worried about?  We can double him.  Who's going to replace Cullen Jenkins?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 19, 2011, 12:14:19 am
Matthews will be suspended the first time they test him for HGH. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 19, 2011, 05:00:00 am
Thursday Aug. 18 practice observations

By Sean Jensen on August 18, 2011 9:43 PM

In a refreshing change, on a beautiful night, the Bears offense had a strong evening.

Bears quarterbacks Jay Cutler and Caleb Hanie routinely threw the ball to their own offensive teammates, and the offensive lines blocked well enough to allow the running backs to consistently get past the line of scrimmage.

But some of that success has to be taken with a grain of salt: defensive starters like Lance Briggs (knee bruise), Brian Urlacher (general soreness) and defensive tackle Anthony Adams (calf) didn't practice Thursday.

Here are some highs and lows:

THE HIGHS
* Caleb Hanie was definitely in a groove, making the short and long throws. He hooked up with undrafted rookie Kris Adams on several long passes down the left sideline.

* Undrafted rookie defensive end Mario Addison seemed to take advantage of his reps with the first- and second-strong defense. He got past starting left tackle J'Marcus Webb a couple of times, although none appeared to be for a sack.

* Receiver Johnny Knox continues to look explosive, both as a kickoff returner and a receiver. While he got a few snaps with the starters, Knox is still mostly with the twos -- something that makes Hanie very happy.

* Tight end Kellen Davis had a strong night, most notably towering high in the end zone for a touchdown from Jay Cutler.

THE LOWS
* Second-year cornerback Josh Moore had a rough night, giving up several explosive passes. He bit hard on a double move by Adams for a long touchdown.

* Receiver Roy Williams made several solid catches. But he juggled and eventually dropped a well-placed pass from Cutler in the middle of the field.

* As the Bears stagger to the end of training camp, the injury list is starting to get longer. Zack Bowman (concussion), Chester Taylor (sore knee), Devin Hester (soreness) and Desmond Clark (unknown).

PRACTICE BALLS GOES TO... Caleb Hanie. The Bears backup quarterback has been getting served humble pie from a coach and a certain diminutive columnist from my newspaper. But Hanie had what appeared to be his strongest practice yet on Thursday night, not throwing any interceptions and tossing several touchdown bombs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 19, 2011, 06:01:36 am
I wasn't at all thrilled to see Williams added to the team. My thinking is he'll be a one year flop and they'll find someone to replace him next season. They need to keep Sanzenbacher. 21 other teams were interested in the kid. That should def say something. We need a reliable guy who can go out and get the 4/5/6 yard balls to keep the chains moving.

Sporty - I am with you on wanting to see Sanzenbacher make it if he has the goods and note other teams interest as well.  How does this guy not get drafted this past April, if so many teams were at his door the day after.  Can't believe someone didn't take him in over 200 picks? Strange...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 07:54:44 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/19/harvey-unga-leaves-bears-for-personal-reasons/

WTF is up with this guy? I'm about ready to say we cut his azz. Clearly there is something that is taking his focus away from football during the most important weeks of his career. In that case let's quit wasting a roster spot (and practice reps) and give them to some kid who's ready to give it 100%.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 19, 2011, 08:26:01 am
I just saw that and was about to post it. Obviously his mind isnt on football. I wonder if its related to that female who just gave birth to his kid. Kinda reminds me of an old joke.

Male teacher in a classroom told all his female students in the front row to cross their legs and so they abide. Teachers says good , now all the doors to hell are closed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 19, 2011, 08:31:04 am
Matthews will be suspended the first time they test him for HGH.

That wouldnt be a shock to me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 08:35:51 am
I say we set our 3 RB rotation at Forte, Barber and Bell and be done with it.

Taylor and Bell are vying for the 3rd RB position (who also has to be ST ace) so the advantage there clearly goes to Bell  (along with being younger and much cheaper).

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 19, 2011, 08:45:01 am
Bears have another RB in camp too, the kid from ND. Maybe he gets a look
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 19, 2011, 09:44:48 am
I say we set our 3 RB rotation at Forte, Barber and Bell and be done with it.

Taylor and Bell are vying for the 3rd RB position (who also has to be ST ace) so the advantage there clearly goes to Bell  (along with being younger and much cheaper).

I'll agree we appear set with our first 3 in the RB rotation, but we haven't played the 2 PS game.  Not ready to dismiss Unga just yet cuz he may have had to take care of some business with his new family.  Priorities.

I keep asking...nobody keeps answering.  What are the Bears going to be doing with the fullback position?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 19, 2011, 09:54:16 am
Will the Bears keep a fullback? (http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post/_/id/4671357/will-the-bears-keep-a-fullback)

When Mike Martz arrived in Chicago last offseason, the Bears moved away from keeping a traditional fullback on the 53-man roster, and instead broke camp with four tight ends. With three preseason games left on the schedule, it's unclear if the team plans to go the same route this fall.  After adding muscle during the offseason, Eddie Williams has had a solid training camp.  If the Bears opt to carry a fourth tight end, the leading candidate for the fullback/H Back role could be undrafted rookie free agent Kyle Adams. The Purdue product is expected to receive significant playing time Monday night versus the New York Giants, both on offense and special teams.  If Martz decides to tweak his philosophy and tab a fullback, Eddie Williams and Will Ta'ufo'ou are the options currently on the training camp roster.  Both Williams and Ta'ufo'ou seem to be enjoying productive camps, and each player brings a little something different to the table.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 19, 2011, 10:06:59 am
Lance Briggs won't play vs. Giants (http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/6875851/chicago-bears-hold-lance-briggs-practice-new-york-giants-game")

Chicago Bears coach Lovie Smith announced after Thursday night's workout that the team plans to hold out linebacker Lance Briggs from Friday's practice, as well as the club's preseason matchup Monday night against the New York Giants.

"We're still getting over a couple of injuries. Lance Briggs has a knee bruise and won't practice tomorrow. We won't play him in the game, but hopefully before long we'll get him out there," Smith said. "We'll just let him rest that knee a little bit."

An eight-year veteran, Briggs sat out of the Thursday practice wearing a compression sleeve on his left leg. The team also held out receiver Devin Hester, cornerback Zack Bowman (concussion), linebacker Brian Urlacher, tight end Desmond Clark and defensive tackle Anthony Adams (calf), along with running back Chester Taylor (knee).

"We have a couple of guys (nursing minor injuries and soreness)," Smith said. "Right at this point in training camp, a lot of times you have these types of injuries popping up. But we don't think it's anything serious."

Smith didn't elaborate on any of the injuries or give a timeline for the return of the players missing Thursday night's session. Bowman has already been declared out for Monday night's game, and it's expected that Adams will miss as well.  Hester, Urlacher and Clark are expected to play.

In other injury news, right guard Lance Louis returned to practice and the starting lineup on Thursday, after missing the Wednesday session because of dehydration.

"Just dehydrated, man, just throwing up," Louis explained. "I had to get my fluids in me because I hadn't eaten much that whole day. I was throwing up. So to keep me safe, they just yanked me."
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 19, 2011, 10:12:39 am
Dom DeCicco has chance to stick at LB (http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/bears/post/_/id/4671317/dom-decicco-has-chance-to-stick-at-lb)

Undrafted rookie free agent Dom DeCicco could be in the mix for the sixth linebacker spot on the Chicago Bears final 53-man roster.  The Bears generally break camp with six linebackers, but right now only four or five positions are secure: Brian Urlacher, Lance Briggs, Nick Roach, Brian Iwuh and probably rookie sixth-round draft choice J.T. Thomas. Thomas, however, has been sidelined with a few injuries in the opening weeks of training camp.  The club continues to keep tabs on Pisa Tinoisamoa, but the veteran is still recovering from offseason knee surgery and is doubtful to be 100 percent by the start of the regular season.  If the club opts to fill the void at linebacker in-house, then DeCicco has three more preseason games to further impress the coaching staff.
 
"Of course we want to see a little more of J.T. Thomas, but Dom DeCicco has done a good job at the middle linebacker spot filling in," Bears head coach Lovie Smith said.  "He played well on special teams (against Buffalo)," Smith said. "We had a few guys play well on special teams, but he was one of them."
 
DeCicco, who played safety for much of his career at Pittsburgh, did transition to linebacker in the second half of the 2010 season. He made a pre-visit to Chicago and caught the eye of Bears linebackers coach Bob Babich, who happens to be a native of Pennsylvania and a former Pitt assistant coach.  DeCicco was the Bears’ second-leading tackler in the preseason opener versus the Buffalo Bills with four stops.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 10:13:15 am
No problem with me if they sit out a bunch of veterans vs. the Giants.  At least on the Defensive side, where the starting lineup is pretty much set and they're as solid as they're gonna be this season.

The Offense, OTOH needs a lot of work and that includes the 1st stringers. Would really like to see Chris Spencer get some extended time at C one of these preseason games since I really don't think Garza playing out of position is our best option there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 19, 2011, 10:50:50 am
shot in the dark here concerning the Giants game...

If Louis sucks, then you'll see Spencer and Garza go to C and RG respectively.

If Webb sucks, then you may actually see Omigawd at LT.  I don't think they want to put Carmini at LT for whatever reason only the coaches know.  I'm not sure if they are ready for the bookend switch yet.

I've heard good things about Williams at LG and hopefully that will continue.

Keep the line out there for at least a half like v. Buffalo and perhaps even into some of the 3rd for reps sake even against their 2s or 3s.  They don't need Jay out long IMO.  Save him for game 3.

Biggs says that Knox is starting to get some reps with the 1s now.  Roy isn't doing himself any favors by admitting he needed to get in shape and some of the alligator arms and a bobble drop he displayed last night.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 11:00:43 am
The first person who needs to get yanked if the OL falters Monday night, is Cutler.

I think Webb is going to have to horribly, terribly screw things up at LT before he gets pulled for Omiyale. Tice has a lot of pride and work invested in J'Marcus Webb and pulling him would essentially amount to benching him since Webb is not OG material and Carimi has the other OT spot locked down.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 19, 2011, 11:25:58 am

If J'Marcus Webb continues to struggle BUT shows improvement they can nurse him along through the season much as they did last season.  They do this by putting a TE over on his side or lining up a back to help with a double team.   But if he's getting totally whipped in game 2 and into game 3...it will be Omiyale time.  He has to at least show that the Bears can occassionally trust him.

If they have to help out Webb then they cannot have another weak link like Louis in there.  So I think Louis won't get as much time to prove himself as Webb will.

As for Carimi, I think the Bears feel that he just isn't ready for LT.  Happens alot.  I think Jonathon Ogden started out as a rookie either at RT perhaps even was a guard.

LT obviously is the key spot on the line but I'd say RT is a close second.  IF Webb can do the job there the Bears' offense will be in good shape (HUGE IF).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 11:31:45 am
I have a feeling Webb will be able to hold his own against bigger, old-school 4-3 DEs.

It's the 6'3, 250-lb quick types (like Merriman) who will give him problems.  And since the 3-4 is pretty much taking over the league he's gonna be facing off against a lot of that type of player, I think.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 19, 2011, 11:41:30 am

Unfortunately, he's probably not getting that type of guy to practice against other than Gholston.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 11:44:41 am
Yup, and that Mario Addison kid, who reportedly was schooling Webb in practice yesterday.

Not good when an UDFA rookie from Troy is taking your starting LT to the woodshed.  Not good at all. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 11:47:41 am
Haven't heard a peep about last year's training camp darling, Josh Asiata.

I have to think his time with the team may be short as we're not going to carry more than 7-8 OL on the active roster (Webb, the two Williams, Garza, Spencer, Omiyale, Carimi and possibly Levi Horn) and I believe his PS eligibility is about gone.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on August 19, 2011, 11:52:25 am
Didn't see last week's game, but I won't judge Webb based on getting beat by Merriman.

When healthy Merriman gives any LT fits.

This weeks game will be a better measure of Webb.

I expect the OL to improve greatly over the course of the PS with Tice.  The question is whether it will be enough.

As for Carimi, most scouts had him as an NFl RT even though he played LT in college.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 19, 2011, 12:00:18 pm
Haven't heard a peep about last year's training camp darling, Josh Asiata.

I have to think his time with the team may be short as we're not going to carry more than 7-8 OL on the active roster (Webb, the two Williams, Garza, Spencer, Omiyale, Carimi and possibly Levi Horn) and I believe his PS eligibility is about gone.

Last season Asiata got exposed in the preseason...when the pads went on.  He looked worse than Louis last week.  He was a nice story but he's gone.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 19, 2011, 12:05:27 pm
As for Carimi, most scouts had him as an NFl RT even though he played LT in college.   

Last season most scouts had Webb flipping burgers even though he played LT in college.

You never really know until you get a guy in a game time situation.  I'd still like to see Carimi get some reps at LT...maybe in PS game 4.

You never know when he might have to play there.  Of course we still have Chris Williams...if we're really desparate.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 12:18:52 pm
Merriman hasn't been relevant for, like 3 years.  To see a burnout like him have such an easy time of it against Webb was disconcerting, to say the least.

Now, if Merriman tears it up again this next exhibition game maybe I'll revise my thinking.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 12:35:35 pm
Man am I glad we didn't draft this assclown:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/19/report-jonathan-baldwin-hurts-wrist-in-locker-room-fight/

Pioli down there in KC must be losing his mojo.  This kid had red flags all over him coming out of college. Doesn't surprise me at all that this happened.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 19, 2011, 01:20:24 pm
Haven't heard a peep about last year's training camp darling, Josh Asiata.

I have to think his time with the team may be short as we're not going to carry more than 7-8 OL on the active roster (Webb, the two Williams, Garza, Spencer, Omiyale, Carimi and possibly Levi Horn) and I believe his PS eligibility is about gone.

Speaking of Horn, he is one big dude. From what I saw of him he looked good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 01:32:05 pm
Have they been working Horn at OT or OG or both?

He's prototypical OT size (6'7, 315) but it seems like our greater need for depth is on the interior, so I'm curious where they project him fitting in to the picture.  I seem to remember Tice saying something last year about him being "nasty" (in a good way) but needing a lot of development.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 19, 2011, 01:37:19 pm
I dont remember where he played, but it was on the right side. Might have been RT
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 01:50:31 pm
Even if Chris Williams is officially all-in as an OG going forward, we still have three lead-pipe locks at OT:  Webb, Carimi and Omiyale.

The Bears are traditionally extremely stingy on the number of active roster spots they allocate to OL. So for Horn to make the roster as essentially a one-position player (backup RT), he is going to really have to show the coaches something this preseason. His odds would improve a greatly if he showed some ability to play inside as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 19, 2011, 03:01:53 pm
Man am I glad we didn't draft this assclown:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/19/report-jonathan-baldwin-hurts-wrist-in-locker-room-fight/

Pioli down there in KC must be losing his mojo.  This kid had red flags all over him coming out of college. Doesn't surprise me at all that this happened.

When are people going to learn not to mess with Thomas Jones? 
Wright reports that Baldwin will likely miss the rest of the preseason after injuring his wrist during a locker room scuffle with teammate Thomas Jones. Baldwin’s work ethic has reportedly been an issue.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 03:19:17 pm
Man do I wish we still had Thomas Jones.

That dude is straight-up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 19, 2011, 03:24:53 pm
I like Forte and Barber better.  Plus Jones is getting up there in age.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 03:35:59 pm
Yeah but Thomas Jones > Chester Taylor.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 19, 2011, 03:45:26 pm
Unless someone gets injured I am guessing Taylor gets cut or traded.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 19, 2011, 04:02:53 pm
Unless someone gets injured I am guessing Taylor gets cut or traded.

The only way I see Taylor sticking is if Unga keeps missing time and the Bears decide to cut bait on him or kick him to the PS.

Even then the Bears would still be carrying 4 RBs assuming Bell makes the cut as well.  It doesn't feel like Taylor has any kind of edge at all over Bell at this point.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 19, 2011, 04:03:06 pm
Bears’ O-line looking for redemption on road against Giants
By SEAN JENSEN sjensen@suntimes.com August 17, 2011 9:48PM

BOURBONNAIS, Ill. — Given the abbreviated offseason, the Bears weren’t going to allow any knee-jerk reactions with their offensive line based on the preseason opener.

They were clearly alarmed that the Buffalo Bills racked up nine sacks, but coaches and general manager Jerry Angelo couldn’t be wholly surprised since four of the starting linemen are lining up at a different position than last season.

But the patience might run out with another poor performance Monday night against the New York Giants.

“We’re looking for a big improvement from guys that had some bad plays in the game,’’
offensive line coach Mike Tice said. ‘‘Looking to see them make some strides in areas where they were weak.’’

If not, though, the Bears could make some changes.

And perhaps add a veteran.

There are a handful of quality linemen still available, and a shuffled lineup — with a new veteran — could have nearly three weeks to jell before the regular season opener Sept. 11 at Soldier Field against the Atlanta Falcons.

Yet the organization is hopeful that the current five can take a collective step forward and encourage them not to call on what Angelo described to the Sun-Times last week as a “Band-Aid.’’

There couldn’t be a greater test than Monday’s game.

The Bears return to the New Meadowlands, where quarterback Jay Cutler was sacked an NFL-record nine times in the first half of a loss last Oct. 3.

‘‘We should still be embarrassed by that, so now you have a chance to go in there and play better and redeem yourself to some extent,” Tice said, noting that it is a preseason game.

The young tackles, J’Marcus Webb and rookie Gabe Carimi, will have to adjust to a hostile environment on a Monday night against a fearsome defensive line. In addition, right guard Lance Louis has to rebound after a shaky game against the Bills.

On Wednesday, though, the Bears were able to field a different lineup, one that included Chris Spencer at center and Roberto Garza at right guard instead of Louis.

The latter fell ill during practice Wednesday, allowing the coaches to get a look at that group.

‘‘It’s nice to take a look,’’ Tice said, ‘‘without turning it into a saga.’’

Louis wasn’t available after practice, and Webb declined comment.

But the starters don’t have room to falter, especially with Spencer — and perhaps a veteran free agent — hungry to take a spot. For his part, Spencer had a strong game against the Bills, and he appreciated the chance to run with the starters.

‘‘It was good, just getting ­comfortable with the guys, and knowing what they’re doing and letting them hear my voice and my calls,’’ Spencer said.

He added that he has worked on better using his hands and feet, and his command of the offense is in place.

As for his goal, he’s still aiming for a starting spot.

‘‘If that’s not your goal, then you shouldn’t be in this league,’’ ­Spencer said. ‘‘That’s always the goal. I have to continue to work hard and keep my head up.’’
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 19, 2011, 11:31:09 pm
WOW I see nothing good about this: During Friday's practice, starting left tackle J'Marcus Webb was carted off as the heat apparently overwhelmed him. Frank Omiyale stepped in at left tackle with the first unit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 20, 2011, 12:58:13 am

 Next up ... NYG! We owe them.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 20, 2011, 05:52:29 am
OMG Omiayale!  Cutler, look out!

This is Louis's chance this Monday.  If he performs, he lives to battle another week and a chance to earn the job.  If he stubs his toe again, it will be time to shuffle the deck.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 07:53:14 am
It will be interesting to see how long they play the 1st unit OLine Monday
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 20, 2011, 09:04:34 am
Everything I have read suggests the O-line will play the entire first half.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 09:23:15 am
They certainly need to
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 09:40:21 am
Williams on solid footing at left guard
Bears like progress he's making in shift from tackle
 
By Brad Biggs, Chicago Tribune reporter
 
August 20, 2011
BOURBONNAIS — The joke, Mike Tice said, is that he doesn't have one project on the offensive line this year, he has five.

He's not kidding when you consider all of the movement and that the only player staying put — at least right now — is left guard Chris Williams, who was moved there on the fly during the middle of last season.

Much has been made about the newcomers and the position changes. But amid all that, Williams put together a training camp without much fanfare that has the Bears excited about the future of the 2008 first-round draft pick.

Williams was a stopgap measure when he was plugged in at left guard during Week 6 last season after only two days of practice there. He was supposed to be the left tackle of the future when he was drafted 14th overall, and now he has made as many NFL starts at left guard (11) as he has at right tackle with only seven at left tackle. If the 25-year-old can find a home at left guard, it will solve one of the team's issues.

"I don't think (my play) was good enough last season," Williams said. "I was real inconsistent. Just trying to work hard now."

Williams didn't complain about being bumped from left tackle, and he has attacked a checklist Tice gave him when camp opened. His to-do list was topped with improving his footwork. When he went to punch defensive linemen last season, he occasionally would lift a foot up, opening an alley to the backfield.

"We're seeing what kind of player Chris can be now that he has had a training camp at guard," Tice said. "He's playing with confidence."

It's not an easy transition from playing on an island at tackle to being in a compact space where the action is right on top of you. But Williams hasn't used that as an excuse. He throws out clichés and seemingly always works his way back to needing to work hard to produce more consistency.

"It's all football, but switching to guard was a pretty quick turnaround," he said.

Now with Williams getting a training camp at his new position, the Bears could start to get a return on their investment.

bmbiggs@tribune.com

Twitter @BradBiggs



Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 10:21:19 am
Undrafted Kyle Adams’ versatility not lost on Lovie Smith
BY SEAN JENSEN sjensen@suntimes.com August 19, 2011 7:52PM

BOURBONNAIS, Ill. — Without offseason workouts and minicamps, Bears coach Lovie Smith struggled early on to get a read on his 90-man roster, especially the 25-plus undrafted rookies.

But former Purdue tight end Kyle Adams didn’t waste any time making an impression at the start of training camp.

“It was fairly quick,” Smith said. “Then every day, more and more.”

Adams is slated to participate in all four phases of the special teams Monday night against the New York Giants, and he’s also been given some snaps at fullback. That’s a strong indication of the team’s interest in him, since it’s not a given that a pure fullback will make the final 53-man roster.

“We talk about the more you can do,” Smith said. “It’s not just lip [service] with us. In all those areas we look for, he can do, and he’s done well.”

So how does Adams feel about his chance to shine Monday at the New Meadowlands?

“I’m stoked,” he said. “That’s just an incredible opportunity.

“First and foremost, I’ve been blessed,” he added. “It’s a great organization, and they’ve given everyone a shot.

“I just try to keep my head down, work hard, and let God take care of the rest.”

Although he grew up in Austin, Texas, where he played at football powerhouse Westlake High, Adams’ parents were athletes at Purdue, where he initially was behind New York Jets tight end Dustin Keller on the depth chart.

But he stood out his junior and senior seasons, being named a co-captain and steadily improving his production.

While he wasn’t drafted, Adams signed with Chicago-based agency BTI Sports Advisors, which fielded calls from a number of teams.

But agent Brad Leshnock said the Bears were the top choice.

“They have a coaching staff and a scouting staff that clearly demonstrated to me and Kyle that they had a plan for him,” said Leshnock, who also represents Bears undrafted rookie receiver Dane Sanzenbacher. “They knew [Adams] as a player, and how they were going to use him.

“When you’re an undrafted guy, that’s huge.”

Adams (6-4, 255 pounds) considers himself a well-rounded tight end, but he did need to brush up on his special-teams play, since seniors don’t traditionally do that at Purdue.

He’s proud that he received his team’s “Pit Bull Award” for exemplifying “tenacity and intense play.”

Webb leaves practice

On one of the hotter days of training camp, with temperatures in the 90s, Bears starting left tackle J’Marcus Webb had to be carted off due to the heat.

Smith indicated it was a precautionary move, and Webb is expected to start against the Giants. Veteran Frank Omiyale filled in for Webb.

“It felt good being with the older guys, and just letting them know I’m here for them,” Omiyale said. “I may have to step in and not cause any mishaps, so it did feel good.”

On Friday, though, the Bears offensive line appeared to struggle, especially during the 2-on-1 blocking session. Webb was soundly beaten on consecutive plays by defensive end Julius Peppers, while several linemates also had some issues.


In brief

Linebacker Brian Urlacher and receiver Devin Hester practiced Friday, while tight end Desmond Clark, linebacker Lance Briggs, defensive tackle Anthony Adams and cornerback Zack Bowman did not.

◆ Defensive end Corey Wootton, who had a scope on his right knee Tuesday, hopes to be able to return in about four weeks.

◆ Receiver Roy Williams has been in Bourbonnais for all of training camp, but he’s still a little shaky on a few things.

“I can’t even pronounce this city,” he said. “But it’s a great city. Is it a city or a town? Village? Oh yea, Village of Bradley, I saw that sign.

“Yea, I’ll miss it,” he said, ­pretending to sniffle.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 20, 2011, 10:27:54 am
Lots of guys are soundly beaten on consecutive plays by Peppers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 11:35:42 am
Yeah, because he is such a great player. So that means we have nothing to worry about. Webb will be just fwine. Ummmm, it sure doesnt  build any confidence in me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 20, 2011, 11:53:16 am
Based on this last week of practice it appears that Webb and Lance Louis are behind the curve on conditioning.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-omiyale-gives-ol-new-look-while-subbing-for-webb-20110819,0,4218597.story

That may be a big part of why they looked so bad against the Bills.

To which I say, they had better get in shape, and fast, or their starting spots are in jeopardy.

If Olin Kreutz was such a great leader then why wasn't he riding our young O-Linemen to keep themselves in shape during the lockout?  I know the coaches weren't allowed to talk to the players but as far as I know the players could talk (and work) with each other as much as they wanted.  I know it can't be fun to be running in the summer heat when you're 320-330 lbs but c'mon, that's their job.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 20, 2011, 12:08:30 pm
I have very little confidence in Webb or Louis.   Kind of funny the two guys who looks the worst both end up having heat related issues.  So they did not keep in shape during the off season with out someone riding their asss.  That has always been the knock on Webb.  Tons of potential but lazy and unmotivated.

My point was Peppers is going to make a lot of guys look bad.  That was also the same practice that Webb was pulled due to heat exhaustion.  If Webb and Louis continue to look bad this next game my guess is they will be riding the bench game 3 in the pre-season and the coaches will not look back.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 12:19:38 pm
My point was Peppers is going to make a lot of guys look bad.  That was also the same practice that Webb was pulled due to heat exhaustion.  If Webb and Louis continue to look bad this next game my guess is they will be riding the bench game 3 in the pre-season and the coaches will not look back.

My reply to that would be a call to Angelo to go and get some vets in here. When I look at the talent on this team I can see Superbowl potential. Why jeopardize that as well as the health of your star QB just to save face? Hey suck it up and do the right thing. There are players still out there that could help us
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 20, 2011, 12:20:34 pm
If Webb doesn't grow up and find a way to keep a fire lit under his own azz, I predict a career for him much like Bryant McKinnie...  although probably not as successful as McKinnie was at his peak.  The two seem to have a lot of similarities both physically and psychologically.

Not to make excuses for Webb, but he clearly was a man among boys during college at Backwater U.  Now that he has to go against equally talented athletes who do this for a living, he's finding it tough sledding. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 20, 2011, 12:25:06 pm
My reply to that would be a call to Angelo to go and get some vets in here. When I look at the talent on this team I can see Superbowl potential. Why jeopardize that as well as the health of your star QB just to save face? Hey suck it up and do the right thing. There are players still out there that could help us

I am not an apologist for Angelo by any means...  but they do have a bit of a dilemma here in that by letting Kreutz walk, sticking with Webb, Chris Williams and Lance Louis, drafting Carimi and signing Spencer they have clearly committed to getting younger on the OL.  I really think one of their top priorities this year is to assemble a starting OL that can take the field with the same 5 guys for the next 4-5 years (except for Garza, of course). Bringing in older  FAs to play LT and RG along with Garza at C may be the smarter move this year but it really doesn't solve the problem longer term and we'll just keep spinning our wheels year after year.

That being said, if Louis continues to come up short I expect to see either Spencer at C and Garza back at RG, or Garza at C and Edwin Williams at RG no later than the 3rd PS game.  At least this year we're playing the OL shell game in preseason and not 5 or 6 games into the regular season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 20, 2011, 12:38:21 pm
Angelo was a dumb ass for not signing some vet O-line help when he had the chance.  All that is left now is guys who have nothing left in the tank or aren't even as good as the guys we have.  He screwed the pooch on the O-line yet again. 

Heck he could have drafted a guard in the draft as well but didn't.  Too busy drafting and signing vets and undrafted free agenst for the defense.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 20, 2011, 12:42:06 pm
Heck he could have drafted a guard in the draft as well but didn't. 

This is my biggest gripe. We were arguably in even worse shape at OG than we were at OT -- especially if Garza was being considered a contingency at C -- yet Angelo did nothing about the interior OL in the draft.

Nobody can convince me that our 3rd round pick (Conte) could not have netted us a rookie OG that at the very least could have been in the mix to start at either of the OG spots this year. And, although we didn't know at the time we would pick up Okoye, the selection of Paea in the 2nd round rather than an OG may ultimately come under scrutiny.

Unfortunately the addition of Tim Ruskell to our staff gives no comfort as the Seahawks OLs he assembled have been among the league's worst for years.

The OL, Tice, Angelo and Ruskell will all be under the magnifying glass Monday night, and with very good reason.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 12:57:59 pm
Angelo was a dumb ass for not signing some vet O-line help when he had the chance.  All that is left now is guys who have nothing left in the tank or aren't even as good as the guys we have.  He screwed the pooch on the O-line yet again. 

Heck he could have drafted a guard in the draft as well but didn't.  Too busy drafting and signing vets and undrafted free agenst for the defense.

He clearly was a dumbass. He gives the impression that he is trying to impress everybody by drafting 6th & 7th round draft picks and force feeding them to the wolves so he can point how knowledgeable in selecting OLine talent. Well he needs to suck up his pride and do the right thing. Superbowl quality talent doesnt happen every year and blowing a Superbowl chance to save your pride is a waste. Every owner and GM should have the goal of making it to the Superbowl
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 20, 2011, 01:02:01 pm
I'm not convinced we have a SuperBowl caliber offense.  In fact, when it comes to the air game in particular I am quite sure we do not.

But I agree with WishfulThinking's point in principle.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 20, 2011, 01:05:11 pm
We would if the O-line was even NFL average.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 01:10:44 pm
We would if the O-line was even NFL average.

Exactly! I think the defense more than makes up for a weak offense.  That I will give Angelo credit for. Gholston and Okoye give me hope we have the defense fixed. I also like what he did by bringing in Barber.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 20, 2011, 01:12:09 pm
Gholston hasn't shown anything.

Okoye looks like a young stud though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 01:16:30 pm
But we had no depth on the DL and there were times last year that the defense got tired late in games and we failed to hold. That shouldnt happen this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 20, 2011, 01:17:01 pm
Gholston showed something to me.  He was disruptive and was getting pressure he just did not register a sack. 

I am not saying he even makes the team because we have so much talent on the D-line but I would not be surprised if he did and contributed this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 01:18:06 pm
I even see signs we could shut teams out this year with a stifling defense
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 01:22:39 pm
I even see signs we could shut teams out this year with a stifling defense

OTOH, with a poor offensive line Cuttler wont stand a chance to make the offense respectable.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 01:31:54 pm
Julius Peppers: Sky is the limit for Bears’ defensive line
BY SEAN JENSEN sjensen@suntimes.com August 18, 2011 4:00PM

Julius Peppers played on some special defensive lines with the Carolina Panthers. But he really likes the potential of his unit with the 2011 Bears.


“I think it could be a great one,” he said. “If everybody continues to work and learn like we have been doing, I think the skies the limit for this group because we have so much depth and so many guys that can play.”


While the Bears did lose Pro Bowl defensive tackle Tommie Harris, the club is confident in the players they retained and are prepared to step into the spotlight. They re-signed veteran Anthony Adams, but they expect Henry Melton to make a name for himself, and they also are optimistic that Matt Toeaina will also become a force. In addition, they’ve been encouraged by the potential of rookie Stephen Paea and free-agents Amobi Okoye and Vernon Gholston, as well as undrafted rookies like Mario Addison.


And, of course, there’s Peppers and Israel Idonije, who each had eight sacks apiece in 2010.


“I see a lot of guys that can play, that fill our system,” Peppers said. “We have explosive and quick guys, that’s what we try and have up front. We’re not necessarily big guys, heavy guys, so I see all the guys that we have fit into the system.”


On paper, the Bears defensive line does look good. But, it is hurt by the loss of Corey Wootton for a few more weeks, after a scope on his right knee Tuesday. With the depth, though, the Bears can probably ease him back and hope he returns to his training camp shape by October.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 20, 2011, 01:34:19 pm
I think what Wshfl is saying is that the Bears, if they stay healthy, have a potentially Super Bowl caliber defense that could allow them to "Baltimore/Tampa Bay" their way offensively to the SB if the o-line was average. 

Right, it does not look like the OL is average.  The Bears do not have a learning curve luxury schedule wise like they did last year to find the right combination.  Therefore, the hooks on Webb and Louis will be swift depending on how much they suck on Monday.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 20, 2011, 01:40:40 pm
I think what Wshfl is saying is that the Bears, if they stay healthy, have a potentially Super Bowl caliber defense that could allow them to "Baltimore/Tampa Bay" their way offensively to the SB if the o-line was average. 

Right, it does not look like the OL is average.  The Bears do not have a learning curve luxury schedule wise like they did last year to find the right combination.  Therefore, the hooks on Webb and Louis will be swift depending on how much they suck on Monday.

Exactly my feelings. And as for Webb and Louis I would hope the hooks are swift. I just dont feel we can hinder the potential of this team by taking a wait and see attitude on fixing that OLine
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 20, 2011, 01:41:15 pm
Why not stick Carimi at LT and simply put Webb back at RT.  Sounds like they want Webb to fail.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 20, 2011, 04:04:02 pm
I think it is more because they think that Carimi can be an outstanding right tackle, and only a somewhat better than average left tackle.  If most scouts around the league thought Carimi has the makings of a great left tackle, he would never have lasted until the Bears made their pick.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 20, 2011, 04:27:16 pm
'On Paper' means nothing. They gotta play when it matters. We could have a gifted line or we could have a line with a bunch of average guys being swapped around (other than Peppers). I don't see any shutouts. We've got a killer schedule. I think at the best we go 10-6 and at worst it's 6-10. Detroit is better, Minny has McNabb, and GB will be there. Then it gets ridiculous with Atlanta, at New Orleans, at Philly, it isn't pretty....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 20, 2011, 06:03:32 pm

You guys are whipping yourself into quite the frenzy here today over the O-line.  Relax.  Watch the game Monday night.

And I'd take it easy on the youngsters with the heat related issues.  Figure those guys are going up against players like Peppers and Okoye - so they are probably getting quite a workout and probably not getting rotated out as much as the d-lineman.

Plus it finally gives a reason for Tice to try Omiyale and Spencer with the first teamers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 20, 2011, 06:08:34 pm

As for the Carimi/Webb LT thing, the Bears must have seen early in camp that Carimi just didn't have the quick feet to excel at LT.  It's a tough position to fill.  You need a guy with size, weight, long arms, balance and quickness. 

I'd still like to see them put Carimi in there for a series or two at LT.  But those darn scouts said he can't play LT so I guess they can's do that, even in a PS game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 20, 2011, 06:18:40 pm
I think the thing with Carimi is you don't want to overwhelm him. He is a rookie trying to learn a new position, don't give him too much by moving him around.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: JeffH on August 20, 2011, 07:10:47 pm
Saints-Texans underway.

No matter how horrible the Bears are, at least they're not as bad as the Texans.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 20, 2011, 07:27:09 pm
 AWWWW BULLSHIIIIIT**** !!!

 LETS PLAY THE GODDAMMED NEW YORK GIANTS !!


 And FUUUUCK everything else!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 20, 2011, 07:55:08 pm
The Texans look pretty good.  Kruetz looked good for the most part but did get owned a few times.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 20, 2011, 07:58:02 pm

 Got the Raiduhs - Frisco game.

 Akers just got 3.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: JeffH on August 20, 2011, 08:06:39 pm
The Texans look pretty good.

Don't be fooled.  The Texans are the Cubs of the NFL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 21, 2011, 01:34:07 am
I think it is more because they think that Carimi can be an outstanding right tackle, and only a somewhat better than average left tackle.  If most scouts around the league thought Carimi has the makings of a great left tackle, he would never have lasted until the Bears made their pick.

If that's the case then Angelo dropped the ball again with a first round pick.  Carimi was drafted to play LT and if he can't play that position then this falls squarely on Angelo.  I personally believe it's Tice that's botching things up with the shape of the Oline.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 21, 2011, 01:41:20 am
Carimi is a prototypical RT for the NFL.  If we put him there and leave him there I believe he will be a pro-bowler multiple times in his career.

That said I think he could also be a damn good LT.  I know he believes he can be.

Lets watch the second pre-season game and then discuss the O-line.  I am positive the coaches will be making changes after the Monday night game if they feel the guys in there are not getting it done.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 21, 2011, 01:42:14 am
I wasn't aware that Carimi was drafted to play LT.  Did Angelo say that at the time?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 21, 2011, 01:43:09 am
Also for whatever it is worth and if Martz remains the OC of the Bears or we keep his system you need not one but two guys with LT skills.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 21, 2011, 07:35:57 am
I think if Webb is shaky at LT we move him back to RT, where he actually started to play fairly well last year.  If Carmimi thinks he is LT, let him prove it.  I would welcome that kind of attitude, instead of Chris Williams sheepishness. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 21, 2011, 08:06:59 am
put the best 5 guys on the line and let'em play.
I think Carimi may already be a better RT than Webb was last year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 21, 2011, 08:35:16 am
put the best 5 guys on the line and let'em play.
I think Carimi may already be a better RT than Webb was last year.

I would agree especially since Webb is a 7th round pick and Carimi is a 1st round pick. Like night and day difference.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 21, 2011, 12:13:15 pm
As Bears break camp, optimism high
But while there are many positives, potential problems raise doubts
 
By Brad Biggs
 
5:47 p.m. CDT, August 20, 2011
BOURBONNAIS — Optimism hasn't run this high in Bears training camp since 2007 when the team was coming off its Super Bowl appearance.

There are enough parallels between then and now — and in each instance coach Lovie Smith received a contract extension during the offseason.

The difference this time around is the team hasn't been complacent following a successful season. After a division title and a trip to the NFC championship game, the Bears made significant personnel changes, something that wasn't done after that Super Bowl season.

The Bears brought 21 starters from that team back with the idea it was entering a period of sustained success. From there they stumbled all the way to a win-or-else campaign in 2010. Some fresh talent, a full year into Mike Martz's offense and a talented defense has the Bears thinking big.

Here are five things we learned and five we still need to find out after a 23-day stay at Olivet Nazarene, the club's 10th training camp at the school:


What we know
1. Re-tooling an offensive line takes time. Without an offseason to drill techniques line coach Mike Tice wants to make second nature, the line remains a work in progress. Change could be on the way. Even if the Bears improved here, it's not going to be the smoothest transition.

2. The defense is stacked up front. General manager Jerry Angelo always has believed in collecting linemen, and the Bears have a bevy of talent at defensive tackle. They have three talented nose tackles in Anthony Adams, Matt Toeaina and Stephen Paea. Henry Melton could bust out at three-technique with Amobi Okoye also there.

3. This is a self-motivated bunch because with few exceptions the team showed up for camp in excellent condition, erasing any fears the lockout would affect a veteran group. Quarterback Jay Cutler is in the best shape he has been in as a professional.

4. The new kickoff rule is going to hurt the Bears. Yes, Johnny Knox had a 70-yard return in the exhibition opener, but the increased touchbacks and deeper kicks are going to put more pressure on the offense to produce sustained scoring drives. They had 10 touchdown drives of 70 or more yards in 2010.

5. Reports of the demise of Marion Barber are premature. The running back appears to have at least another strong season in him if tough running in camp and the first exhibition is an indication. He has the power and burst to bring another dimension to the scheme.


What's unknown
1. Can the linebackers hold up? Lance Briggs will not play Monday night with a bruised knee, and Brian Urlacher missed some time at the end of camp. The fourth linebacker is Brian Iwuh and after that the Bears face the prospect of playing a rookie. If a veteran addition is made at any position, this is the spot.

2. What is the plan for Knox? It wasn't until camp ended that he got some selective reps with the starters. After a 960-yard season, he's in a lesser role that hasn't been defined. The Bears need newcomer Roy Williams to succeed for this move not to look like a personnel fumble.

3. The defense is thin at linebacker and there isn't a lot of cover in the secondary, either. A competition between Tim Jennings and Zack Bowman for the left cornerback job never materialized, and Major Wright is unproven at free safety as the last line of defense.

4. If Matt Forte's contract situation remains unresolved, will that affect his play? Based on the last three weeks, it's evident the issue is weighing on him. Forte can't set a hard deadline because he doesn't have leverage like Cardinals wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald, who has a clause in his contract that prevents the team from putting a franchise tag on him next year.

5. It's impossible to figure out why there has been a spin attempt to suggest that now-departed veteran center Olin Kreutz was holding back the development of younger linemen. Developing linemen became more difficult when he left.

bmbiggs@tribune.com

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 21, 2011, 04:28:41 pm
I wasn't aware that Carimi was drafted to play LT.  Did Angelo say that at the time?

Uh, Carimi played LT for 4 years at Wisconsin.  Does Angelo have to say what he was drafted for after that?  Left tackle is the MOST important position on the oline and that's what Carimi was drafted for.  Webb already had right tackle sewn up until Tice decided to tinker with that position.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 21, 2011, 04:54:56 pm
I dont believe I ever heard Angelo say he drafted Carimi to be the heir apparent at LT.  Like I've heard it said. If scouts and GMs thought Carimi was good enough to play LT in the NFL he would have gone a lot higher in the draft.  Thats not to say Carimi cant play LT just that they dont think he is athletic enough to play the position at the NFL level.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 21, 2011, 05:05:11 pm
Everyone felt Carimi would be a very good RT a few thought he could play LT.  It will sort itself out and I have no problem with it if they decide to leave him at RT for this year and then make a decision for next year fairly early.  A lot of LT's start at RT their first year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 21, 2011, 05:05:48 pm
Also in Martz system you really need two tackles with LT skills.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 21, 2011, 09:38:15 pm
Uh, Carimi played LT for 4 years at Wisconsin.  Does Angelo have to say what he was drafted for after that?  Left tackle is the MOST important position on the oline and that's what Carimi was drafted for.  Webb already had right tackle sewn up until Tice decided to tinker with that position.

Yes, he does.  It appears that from the gitgo, the Bears saw Carimi as a right tackle.  Scouts told every other team that.  That is why he wasn't a top 5 pick.  Very good right tackles go near pick number 30.  Very good left tackles go much earlier.  Which side he played in college doesn't tell the entire story.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 21, 2011, 10:04:43 pm
So if he played LT all 4 years at Wisconsin how can anybody say he can play RT better?

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 21, 2011, 11:39:15 pm

 It should be remembered that WEBB was a throwaway draft pick in the seventh round.

 If you draft Carimi to be a RG/RT etc. or whatever,

 when he spent his whole life at being a LT then do whatever the fuuuck makes yer dick hard.

 We signed Chris Spencer because of his kickof return skills now that the kickoff line has been moved to the 35 yard line.

 Oh sure he could play Center once in a while ...

 but goddammn is he fast at returning a ball ! He'll compliment Hester.  ;D

 Has Halas Hall ever been checked for Radon Gas Symptoms?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 22, 2011, 07:05:25 am
So if he played LT all 4 years at Wisconsin how can anybody say he can play RT better?

How can it be that you know more than the scouts around the league?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 22, 2011, 07:51:10 am
Phill, he might have been the best option they had to play LT at Wisconsin who knows.
It is reported he is a better run blocker than pass blocker and more likely to be a dominant RT than LT.
I expect he could eventually be serviceable at LT but I can agree that putting him on the RT to better utilize his talent and athletic ability makes more sense.

Assuming Louis gets demoted, If we end up with Webb,Williams,Spencer,Garza,Carimi, you only have one reallly weak spot on the line that you have to compensate for and that is Webb, the rest of the guys should be able to hold their own.
If Carimi is overmatched at LT and Webb is at RT(I imagine he got a lot of help last year), you have to help both of your tackles.

Only having one question mark makes me feel better, we can keep a TE over there, have the RB chip or something to help Webb out over there as needed.

It could end up though that while Webb is more athletic that Carimi still ends up being a better LT.
Kind of like Danielle Manning was more athletic but Mike Brown was a better FS(when healthy).

I think the coaches feel that if Webb ever gets it that he can be the LT that we put over there and forget about him for a long time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 22, 2011, 08:18:25 am
I wasn't aware that Carimi was drafted to play LT.  Did Angelo say that at the time?

The consensus among scouts prior to the draft was that Carimi does not have the skill set to be an NFL LT.  Every scouting report I read on the guy (and I read a lot) said his future would be at RT.  So far anyway, at least, it appears Tice concurs with those opinions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 22, 2011, 08:34:03 am

Didn't those same scouts say Chris Williams was a top 20 draft pick at LT?  How many said he'd be better off at LG?

What counts is how you do in game time situations...draft position...scouting reports...practices...don't really mean all that much when you're in a game.

Webb might not settle into the LT job until midway through the season.  If Cutler doesn't get killed by then and the Bears are in line for a playoff spot  then it was the right move.  Could be rough sledding for a few weeks or so...hopefully Martz adjusts his playcalling.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 22, 2011, 08:41:57 am
If Webb fails at LT, I would expect to see Omiyale back there before they flip Carimi to the other side.

The coaches seem that committed to keeping Carimi at RT...  or to NOT playing him at LT... whichever way you want to look at it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on August 22, 2011, 10:42:14 am
BEAR ATTACKS WISCONSIN CHILD

(http://www.frontiernet.net/~packers12/be1.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on August 22, 2011, 11:19:49 am
heh
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on August 22, 2011, 12:29:09 pm
BEAR ATTACKS WISCONSIN CHILD

(http://www.frontiernet.net/%7Epackers12/be1.jpg)

Love it!   ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on August 22, 2011, 07:01:05 pm
The rivalry starts early.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: JeffH on August 22, 2011, 07:08:13 pm
Is there any truth to the rumor that Jerry Angelo has reached out to Jim Hendry to see if he'd be interested in destr...uh, joining the Bears?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 22, 2011, 09:35:40 pm
NFL network will show Bears/Titans game next Sunday Noon CT/1ET (http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/networkschedule?selectedDate=08/28/2011&field=selectedDate).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 22, 2011, 09:37:02 pm
He's just what the Bears already have, a GM that only spends money on worthless players
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on August 22, 2011, 09:58:51 pm
Like Rios?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 22, 2011, 10:06:03 pm
NFL network will show Bears/Titans game next Sunday Noon CT/1ET (http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/networkschedule?selectedDate=08/28/2011&field=selectedDate).

I won't be watching. Tonight's disaster was quite enough for awhile.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 22, 2011, 10:21:24 pm
We finally score in the red zone. Woo Hoo.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on August 23, 2011, 09:12:53 am
For the 1st 2 series (at least on defense), they looked good. When they dialed everything back, the Giants started moving the ball.....

Our vaunted "depth" on the dline just took a credibility hit.

On offense, at least Cutler didn't have his brains beat out. Roy Williams looks like crap- Plaxico would've been better :D

Special teams sucked, but since it looked like folks were shuffled around and they were experimenting a bit. Consider it a failure and move on....

The other punter Langton has good hang time on his kicks, but needs to understand the speed of the game a little more (although having an unblocked man charging you will kind of mess your concentration up)....


Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 23, 2011, 09:29:34 am
That first punt by Podlesh didn't impress me at all.  We were deep in our own territory and needed a booming kick to get us out of trouble and IIRC their guy got the ball at like their 40 or something.

The way our offense looks we're gonna be punting a lot so that needs to get fixed ASAP.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 23, 2011, 12:21:30 pm
This was very interesting reading, however they had it divided into 3 sections so I figured it was too long to post here. Please read it.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-biggs-10-thoughts-on-the-bears-loss-to-giants-20110823,0,1793785,full.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 23, 2011, 12:33:16 pm
For the 1st 2 series (at least on defense), they looked good. When they dialed everything back, the Giants started moving the ball.....

Our vaunted "depth" on the dline just took a credibility hit.

On offense, at least Cutler didn't have his brains beat out. Roy Williams looks like crap- Plaxico would've been better :D

Special teams sucked, but since it looked like folks were shuffled around and they were experimenting a bit. Consider it a failure and move on....

The other punter Langton has good hang time on his kicks, but needs to understand the speed of the game a little more (although having an unblocked man charging you will kind of mess your concentration up)....

Good points.

Everyone other than Peppers was applying pressure, particularly  Melton and Toeaina.   Don't know why Bears didn't sub in Okoye with the starters.

Gholston didn't do much.  And the rookie Addison looked to be most active of a pretty inactive bunch.

I heard the same gripes against the special teams last August.  The only difference this year is that new kickoff rule could definitely hurt our field position more that most teams in comparison to last year.

As for punters, maybe we should sign the loser of the Giants punter battle?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 23, 2011, 12:52:39 pm
The only difference this year is that new kickoff rule could definitely hurt our field position more that most teams in comparison to last year.

I knew that rule change was going to screw the Bears but I didn't realize how badly till last night. It seemed like our O was playing on a long field the whole game.

We clearly are not going to have the field position advantage we had in years past... which means we will have to be able to sustain long drives this year in order to stay in games scoring wise... and with our hands-of-stone WRs that could prove to be quite a trick.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 23, 2011, 06:02:25 pm
When's the first roster cutdown?  Any projections on who may be making an early exit and who might stick around longer?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on August 23, 2011, 06:40:20 pm
From PFT:

Chicago Bears: Chester Taylor
Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images
A member of the Chicago Bears 2010 free-agent acquisitions along with game-changer Julius Peppers, running back Chester Taylor may be on the outside looking in when the team trims it's roster to 53 players.

Marion Barber is definitely an upgrade between the tackles and is a viable option as Matt Forte's primary backup.

Taylor underwhelmed in 2010 after the Bears paid him $7 million, and they really like what they've seen out of Khalil Bell as the team's scat back and as a special teamer.

I don't see how Chester Taylor is a Chicago Bear in a few weeks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 23, 2011, 06:53:55 pm
It was shake rattle and roll time on the east coast.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 23, 2011, 06:57:07 pm
I think they have to cut down to 80 by Tues.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 24, 2011, 08:05:44 am
I would suspect the axe will fall pretty hard on the WRs and DBs in particular for that first roster cutdown.

There are a lot of rookies in those two groups that didn't get much playing time Monday night and/or didn't show much in the time they were in. 

We also seem to have a lot of camp bodies at LB right now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on August 24, 2011, 08:18:51 am
From the Trib

As Kevin Seifert pointed out in his NFC North blog on ESPN.com, since 2008, Williams has dropped a higher percentage of passes than any player in the league targeted as least 200 times. He had 19 drops in 231 passes thrown his way, 8.2 percent.  He also had the third-lowest catch percentage in the league over the last three seasons. Williams caught 48.1 percent of the passes thrown to him (111 of 231), which put him ahead of only Braylon Edwards (46.6) and Bryant Johnson (47.3).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 24, 2011, 08:21:55 am
If Roy Williams and Devin Hester don't pick up their games considerably, our passing offense is going to struggle mightily this year.

You can fix a lot of things with a WR but you can't fix hands or focus and those appear to be pretty big problems with at least two of our top WRs right now.  Specifically with Roy Williams, Cutler -- like any good QB -- will simply stop throwing to him if he feels he can't be trusted. At which point we are basically playing 10 against 11 whenever Williams is in the game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 24, 2011, 08:48:03 am

Roy Williams will get better...much better than what we've seen.  But folks need to understand he's not a legit #1...not even close.  But he is tall.

Bears got a good cheap deal in signing Williams - should have went after a legit playmaker like Sidney Rice.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 24, 2011, 09:07:47 am
I think Martz will keep Williams on a short leash. If he doesn't perform I expect we would see Knox in there in a hurry.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 24, 2011, 09:24:16 am
It would be kind of funny if they cut Roy Williams (and Vernon Gholston) just to set an example for any other Bears vets that might feel like dogging it the rest of the preseason.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 24, 2011, 09:31:31 am
I think Martz will keep Williams on a short leash. If he doesn't perform I expect we would see Knox in there in a hurry.

Earl Bennett is the guy that needs to be in there. He's the only one Cutler can count on right now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Eastcoastfan on August 24, 2011, 09:57:54 am
Very frustrated that the Bears are still sitting lots of cap $ and let legit playmaker receivers go elsewhere.  I mean, you have a Martz offense and Cutler as your QB!  Agree with Dallasbear.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 24, 2011, 10:31:28 am
I'm starting to wonder if Martz has lost it.

His offense last year looked outdated and ill-equipped to handle good NFL defenses (especially 3-4 D's with big physical DBs), and his talent decisions (both in acquisitions and utilization) have been questionable to put it kindly.  Given the high hopes that came with him after the Ron Turner years, Martz has failed to live up to his hype by quite a lot. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 24, 2011, 10:57:40 am

The mad scientist toned it down in the 2nd half (although he did have a relapse in the regular season finale at GB). 

I just can't see how an OC can't take advantage of players like Aroma (who Cutler took a liking too), Olsen and now possibly Knox.

Assuming our O-line has improved (not saying much), who are the playmakers on this offense besides Forte?  Just about every offense in the league has at least 2.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 24, 2011, 11:01:41 am
Assuming our O-line has improved (not saying much), who are the playmakers on this offense besides Forte?  Just about every offense in the league has at least 2.

I was wondering the exact same thing early in the Monday night game watching Williams and Hester drop passes and trip over their own shoelaces.

We have a big-play QB but it takes a few more pieces than that.  This year's offense may wind up looking very Turner-esque if our skill position talent doesn't step up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 24, 2011, 11:04:16 am
to really shine, Martz needs a good OL, something he didn't have last year.
Until he gets one we won't see the full potential.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 24, 2011, 11:11:33 am
Roy Williams will get better...much better than what we've seen. 

What makes you so sure of that? He didnt get any better in Dallas did he? To me, what you see is what you get.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 24, 2011, 11:17:42 am
I remember a ridiculous catch Roy Williams made against us when he was still with the Lions (might have been his rookie season).

I want that Roy Williams to come back and the sooner the better. 

Unfortunately, that Roy Williams was a couple of big contracts ago. If a guy's not self-motivated to play up to his ability, there's not a lot you can do.  This is his last shot at redemption, with one of the few remaining coaches in the league that still believes in him and a QB that is far and away more gifted than anyone else he's played with.  I hope he realizes the opportunity he has and takes advantage.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 24, 2011, 01:40:14 pm
The mad scientist toned it down in the 2nd half (although he did have a relapse in the regular season finale at GB). 

I just can't see how an OC can't take advantage of players like Aroma (who Cutler took a liking too), Olsen and now possibly Knox.


Something must be wrong because I'm agreeing regularly with DALLASBEAR???   I feel the same way about those players that Martz has jettisoned out and with him possibly not back next season means we'll have to once again re-tool the offense.

Roy Williams hasn't impressed anyone YET and Martz obviously not going to utilize the TE position offensively like last season may mean the offense will be the same as last year's version.   I had hoped he at least would utilize the shot gun for Cutler.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 24, 2011, 01:40:49 pm
to really shine, Martz needs a good OL, something he didn't have last year.


That goes for ANY offensive coordinator.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 24, 2011, 01:44:53 pm
I had hoped he at least would utilize the shot gun for Cutler.

Definitely. Especially now that we don't have to worry about "Wild Thing" Kreutz spraying snaps all over the field.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 24, 2011, 03:11:55 pm
Williams is a talker,not a player. He drops a ball and makes a 'first down' motion with his arm. Someone forgot to tell him he needs the BALL. Don't like him, never have. There were better options and he should not be on this team.

Merrill Hoge made a comment I thought was very relevant about the Bears Oline issues. Bears keep too many blockers in, TE's, rb's which limits the offenses ability to make plays due to fewer recievers because the Offensive Line isn't doing its job. So instead of grabbing huge blocking TE's maybe we should have acquired competant NFL level linemen to do it.

This entire fricking mess could have been averted had Angie understood the importance of having top quality draft picks on the line and at reciever....it's very frustrating that he cannot seem to get that....over and over and over
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 24, 2011, 03:22:42 pm
This entire fricking mess could have been averted had Angie understood the importance of having top quality draft picks on the line and at reciever....it's very frustrating that he cannot seem to get that....over and over and over

Totally agree.  There are 5 positions on the OL so simple math dictates you had better be drafting at least one O-Lineman virtually every damm year.  And not with bottom of the barrell picks, either (5th round and lower).

The problem of course as I've noted many times, is that Angelo's heir apparent (Ruskell) shares the same philosophy and as a result the Seahawks OL has been among the worst in the league for years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 24, 2011, 04:55:56 pm
He has half of it right but cannot figure out there's two sides to a coin. He's trying like a madman to get a top flight Defensive Line, but is almost totally ignoring the equal importance of the Offensive Line, thinking he can get away with one or two picks every five years there that are any good and just plug Moe Larry and Curly in and it'll run great.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 24, 2011, 05:28:58 pm
Bears tell Roy Williams he may lose starting job

 Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on August 24, 2011, 5:58 PM EDT
 
Getty Images
It turns out that media and fans aren’t the only ones in Chicago starting to grumble about Roy Williams.
 
Bears receiver coach Darryl Drake sent a loud message to Williams on Wednesday.
 
“[He's not where he needs to be, and he knows that," Drake said via the Chicago Sun-Times. "He and I have talked about that. And the good thing about it is, you got Johnny Knox who is fighting and working hard.
 
"And believe you and me, [Williams] also understands that Johnny is there, and Johnny is hungry, and Johnny wants his spot back. And if things don’t start changing, then Johnny is going to be in there. Heard it straight from the horse’s mouth.”
 
Those are fighting words.  Knox by all accounts has enjoyed a strong camp.  Talent rises in the NFL, and it’s hard to imagine Knox staying out of the starting lineup throughout the season.
 
Heck, it sounds like Knox could be there by Week One the way Williams is going.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 24, 2011, 06:14:30 pm
'Knox! You're on the second team! You need to PICK it up! You're YOUNG, inexperienced and need alot of work! We've got ROY that is a experienced pro and produces!'......one week passes.....'Williams! You're on second team! You need to PICK it up! We've got Knox and he's ready, able and willing to step right in and fill your shoes!.......Knox?......is Knox still on the team?

Are these guys done showing how retarded a staff can be yet?....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 24, 2011, 06:33:03 pm
They were trying to light a fire under Knox and it seemed to have worked.  Now they are doing the same to Williams.  Competition is good but one has to wonder why it takes such prodding from the coaches to get these guys to give their best effort.

They should not have named either the starter and simply said you rotate with the ones until one of you wins the job.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 24, 2011, 10:52:55 pm
Gag. I Just saw the replay of Roy "the #1 Bear receiver" getting the  ball taken from him in front of the entire world on
Thanksgiving. Tough guy. Real tough.  Comes through big time when it really counts.  I own cheap suitcases that refuse to fold like that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 25, 2011, 07:32:57 am
They were trying to light a fire under Knox and it seemed to have worked.  Now they are doing the same to Williams.  Competition is good but one has to wonder why it takes such prodding from the coaches to get these guys to give their best effort.

They should not have named either the starter and simply said you rotate with the ones until one of you wins the job.

That certainly would have accomplished the same thing, but maybe the coaches felt like we did that guys would come in motivated and ready to play and they didnt need to resort to extra motivation.  While I agree that such tactics are old fashioned, I give the coaches credit for doing their jobs and not just burying somebody on the depth chart.

I still believe that Williams wasnt motivated enough in Dallas. IMHO this is his last chance to resurect his career. He better shape up or get cut. Maybe he is moping about the lesser money he took to come here, but he is going to have to perform or sit. We need performers here not potential malcontents
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 25, 2011, 08:20:22 am
Just read fox sports "20 most important guys playing in the nfl". Guess one of the teams that had zeeero? Go ahead, guess. I'll give you a hint: it starts with "shuh" ends in "oh" and has a "kag" in the middle.  Unbelievable.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 25, 2011, 08:26:40 am
Just read fox sports "20 most important guys playing in the nfl". Guess one of the teams that had zeeero? Go ahead, guess. I'll give you a hint: it starts with "shuh" ends in "oh" and has a "kag" in the middle.  Unbelievable.

Bears get no respect.  But then, they haven't done a lot to earn it either.

Going half-azzed against the Packers the final game of the regular season last year -- and then failing to beat them in the NFC Championship game -- put a huge hit on the credibility of  Lovie and the entire organization.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 25, 2011, 08:37:04 am

Doesn't surprise me in the least considering there are about 15 QBs better rated than Cutler and about 10 HBs ranked ahead of Forte.  And that's not even taking into account wide receivers, pass rushing DEs, and CBs that are better than Cutler/Forte/Peppers.

There really isn't a whole lot of individual talent on this team but they play well together and play hard and the weaker offense gets baled out by the top defense and special teams play.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 25, 2011, 08:38:39 am
Bears get no respect.  But then, they haven't done a lot to earn it either.

Going half-azzed against the Packers the final game of the regular season last year -- and then failing to beat them in the NFC Championship game -- put a huge hit on the credibility of  Lovie and the entire organization.

I don't think the Eagles, Falcons and Steelers see it that way.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 25, 2011, 09:18:40 am
There really isn't a whole lot of individual talent on this team but they play well together and play hard and the weaker offense gets baled out by the top defense and special teams play.

The problem is that when you stick with this same formula year after year year after...  as the Bears rigidly have under Lovie...  it becomes very easy for opposing teams to figure out how to beat you.  In the case of the Bears, the way you beat them is to contain their returners, render their offense ineffective (easily done), force their D to play a lot of snaps and then take advantage of their fatigue in the 2nd half. 

What this team really needs to do to get to the next level is to get the offense to a place where other teams have to fear it. Even if the D and STs aren't as strong as in years past, a legitimate NFL offense that can win time-of-possession and put up 25-35 points a game would result in a more consistently competitive team, IMHO.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 25, 2011, 09:27:29 am

Offhand I can only rember a couple offensive teams that fit that bill.  The '85 Bears...they really had a good offense.  And that mid 90s Kramer led Bears offense with Jeff Graham and Curtis Conway.   Anyone else recall any potent Bears offense in the last decade or three?

Bears have some of the pieces in place on offense right now and if that line can get their act together the WR play should improve.  But you really need a go to guy at WR.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 25, 2011, 09:48:28 am
Red zone offense in particular has just killed the Bears for years. I can't remember a year in recent history when I had any confidence the Bears could consistently seal the deal once they got inside the 20.  If it's not the lack of a short-yardage runner it's drops, and if it's not drops it's sacks, and if it's not sacks it's penalities, and if it's not penalties it's turnovers.

It's to the point where I figure either the coaches don't recognize it's a problem, or they don't care (because of course our D is so dependable), or they're incapable of fixing it. 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 25, 2011, 11:14:17 am
Cutler's receivers not the problem
Deep corps, including rookie Sanzenbacher, can excel ... if the suspect offensive line gives the QB time
 
David Haugh's In the Wake of the News
 
9:54 p.m. CDT, August 24, 2011

If you couldn't pick Bears rookie wide receiver Dane Sanzenbacher out of a roomful of Chicago busboys, let alone pronounce his name correctly, you're not alone.

One day last week at training camp, a Bears public relations assistant escorted fellow rookie Chris Conte to a radio appearance under the impression it was the unassuming, undrafted wide receiver from Ohio State. Conte was confused, the PR guy embarrassed and Sanzenbacher as cool as ever.

"Don't worry," Sanzenbacher deadpanned to the staffer. "We all look alike."

Jay Cutler not only knows who Sanzenbacher is but sounds interested in trying to find him more.

Cutler was the one who invited Sanzenbacher to appear alongside him on WSCR-AM's "Bears All Access,'' after Caleb Hanie canceled. And a week after calling Sanzenbacher a "mini-Wes Welker,'' on the show, Cutler complimented the wide receiver making the preseason impact Roy Williams was supposed to make.

"He's impressive,'' Cutler said Wednesday about Sanzenbacher. "Once we started putting a lot of stuff in, you could tell he was swimming a little bit. Now, I think once we really get all of the details to him he's going to be fine. He's going to be a guy I think we're going to use a lot, hopefully.''

When Cutler targeted Sanzenbacher twice in the two-minute drill Monday night against the Giants, it illustrated the growing confidence the Bears have in the quick, crafty 5-foot-11, 180-pounder whose immediate grasp of the offense shows. When it doesn't show, Cutler lets him know the way a veteran quarterback should — a telling sign that Sanzenbacher's development matters more than most rookies whose signing bonus was $5,000.

"Jay's been great,'' Sanzenbacher said. "Obviously he probably gets frustrated sometimes with me but really takes the time to go over the little things and echo what Coach (Mike) Martz says.''

The unexpected emergence of Sanzenbacher doesn't make Williams' diva act any more tolerable or Johnny Knox's mystery demotion any less curious. But it bodes well for a wide receiving corps likely to go the committee route again that Cutler already has such faith in the fifth or sixth member.

Stop waiting for Williams to lay claim to the mythical role of No. 1 wide receiver. Williams still talks like a Pro Bowl threat, as Wednesday's exercise in delusion indicated, but has yet to back it up with evidence. Maybe he will, maybe he won't. The Bears knew the risk involved.

In the NFL, the value of a player's contract sets expectations more than any hyperbolic offensive coordinator. So keep in mind Williams' one-year, $1.5 million prove-it contract more than Martz's silly prediction he would catch 80 passes. That's 55-reception money. Will he catch more passes than Sanzenbacher?

Williams can be a red-zone threat and occasional downfield option opposite Devin Hester, the receiver enjoying the best preseason. He likely won't replace Earl Bennett as the go-to guy on third downs. He cannot become a locker-room distraction.

We can debate whether Jerry Angelo should have filled some of the Bears' ample space under the salary cap by pursuing another proven receiver for Cutler. But no question Angelo erred in not investing more heavily in a veteran for the offensive line after the Bears struck out chasing Steelers tackle Willie Colon. Protect the quarterback and Cutler will make receivers one through five maximize their value.

Receiver-by-committee always has been the Bears way, and seeing what Cutler did Monday night when not under pressure makes that design understandable. The concern isn't Williams or Knox or the guys running patterns. The great unknown for the Bears remains the guys protecting a quarterback who looks poised to return to elite status if given adequate time to throw. This is Cutler's team now and his time.

"The Giants game was a huge confidence booster for not only the offensive line, but me in their ability to protect me and us to do some of the stuff we want to do, seven-step drops and get rid of the ball quick and spread it out some,'' Cutler said.

It can be risky in Chicago commenting on a public figure's weight. The other day at a River North restaurant, singer LeAnn Rimes expressed disgust after a patron referenced her skinny frame, reports say. So it was a relief when I asked Cutler if he ever had been leaner entering a season and he politely confirmed the obvious.

"I have not been this lean,'' Cutler said. "I could tell the difference in my footwork and my ability to get up in the pocket. I don't really get as tired as much throughout camp because I'm not carrying the weight.''

A welcome surprise like Sanzenbacher helps make Cutler's burden lighter too.

dhaugh@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 25, 2011, 11:20:41 am
The only thing gonna turn this team around and into a true champion is getting rid of Angie asap and finding a GM that can draft talent....he cannot....just check my post in 'todays game' for the miserable evidence....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 25, 2011, 11:54:48 am
It can be risky in Chicago commenting on a public figure's weight. The other day at a River North restaurant, singer LeAnn Rimes expressed disgust after a patron referenced her skinny frame, reports say. So it was a relief when I asked Cutler if he ever had been leaner entering a season and he politely confirmed the obvious.

"I have not been this lean,'' Cutler said. "I could tell the difference in my footwork and my ability to get up in the pocket. I don't really get as tired as much throughout camp because I'm not carrying the weight.''

I was wondering about this when I saw Cutler listed at 220 on the this year's roster (he was 233 last year). Then it was confirmed when I saw him in the 4th quarter sideline interview on Monday night.  He looks great...  the "neck roll" and jowls are completely gone.  You have to prop the guy...  by all accounts and appearances he has done everything possible on his end to get to the next level this season.  Which makes it even more crucial that his supporting cast gets their s*t together too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 25, 2011, 12:15:16 pm
Last year they came within a game of the Super Bowl.  Not too long before that, they were IN the Super bowl.

How many teams and coaches have done more to win respect"?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 25, 2011, 12:38:30 pm
they seem to win a lot of games they shouldn't by what appears to be luck.
They also lose a bunch of games that you would think they have in the bag.

I think when we start winning the games we should and then maybe get a few of the ones we shouldn't then we'll get some respect.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 25, 2011, 12:38:36 pm
I think a lot of the reason the Bears struggle for respect is because of Lovie Smith and Jerry Angelo.

These are two guys that are incredibly average at jobs they are being paid a lot of money to do, yet in their dealings with the media and the public they are aloof at best and condescending at worst.  They have attitudes like they're the smartest, most accomplished HC and GM in the league when the product on the field proves they are very far from it.

Incompetence and arrogance isn't a very appealing combination to a lot of people.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 25, 2011, 12:41:52 pm
they seem to win a lot of games they shouldn't by what appears to be luck.
They also lose a bunch of games that you would think they have in the bag.

I think when we start winning the games we should and then maybe get a few of the ones we shouldn't then we'll get some respect.

That's a good point and another thing I would add to that is, we almost never dominate a game from beginning to end, and we hardly ever blow a team out. So many of our wins are either fluky / luck things where we don't play well enough to win but somehow manage to pull it out at the end, or games where we get up big in the 1st half and then let the other team back in and have to scratch and claw just to protect the win.  We don't have a killer instinct, we're not very exciting to watch on either offense or defense, our coaches and players often seem to lack focus and urgency, and we don't "finish" games well at all.

Think back to that Pats game last year where they came out and just took it to us from the opening kickoff and never let up. I could count on one hand the number of games we did that to an opponent during Lovie's whole tenure.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 25, 2011, 01:14:04 pm
We can debate whether Jerry Angelo should have filled some of the Bears' ample space under the salary cap by pursuing another proven receiver for Cutler. But no question Angelo erred in not investing more heavily in a veteran for the offensive line after the Bears struck out chasing Steelers tackle Willie Colon. Protect the quarterback and Cutler will make receivers one through five maximize their value.

I couldnt let this fly without comment either. Cutler will make this team better if only he had the Oline, but Angelo doesnt want to spend rhe cash or the high draft picks necesary to make this team top notch. With time to throw Cutler can carve up a defense.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 25, 2011, 01:33:37 pm
I agree our OL is still under-talented, but Monday night's offensive fail was totally on the WRs.

Cutler had adequate time, but Roy Williams couldn't buy a catch, and Hester played like he was trying on a new pair of feet.

Just because our OL has been historically bad doesn't mean our WRs deserve a free pass. They played worse Monday night than the OL did.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 25, 2011, 02:08:30 pm
The receivers did play worse.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: ben on August 25, 2011, 11:48:27 pm
Jeez, guys, lighten up a bit.

Lovie may not be good with the press and he's clearly no Belicheck, but his team's play fast and hard, and he handles himself with class and always keeps his cool on the sidelines, which probably helps his players keep their cool...most importantly, his W/L percentage and playoff record is WAY better than the decade-plus between he and Ditka.   

Just think back to the days of Wanny and Jauron the next time Lovie starts driving you nuts!

As for ripping Hester, he just toasted their CB for 37 yards on the one play and always draws double coverage because of what he can do!   He tripped on Roy Williams' foot on the play near the goal...whose fault was that? (I don't know)   Hester is certainly a better KR than WR and he isn't a #1 WR; but it's also true that he hasn't been a WR for very long...whatever, i'm sure as hell glad he's on OUR sideline!   

I've probably seen too many guys like Rickie Watts and Wendell Davis and Rashied Davis line up at WR for us over the years!





Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 26, 2011, 12:22:53 am
Great post Ben.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 26, 2011, 09:03:58 am

It was a great post, but I don't agree with all of it.

I have often discussed the cigar store Indian complaints against Lovie.  My main issue with Lovie is his relationship with Angelo.  Somehow the talent Angelo is acquiring is not getting developed by Lovie.  But that may not be Lovie's fault.

As a coach, Lovie pretty much delegates on offense but you can see his influence on defense.  I liked how he had that come to Jesus meeting with Martz during the middle of the season that pretty much saved the season for the Bears.

There will always be people who complain about the head coach.   Ditka was attacked often, especially towards the end of his Bears' career.

As for Hester.  Yes he is talented.  Yes the defense has to focus on him.  Yes he is maddenly inconsistent.  We saw it Monday night on several plays.

The papers say he's improved in the offseason.  I hope they're right but I'd like to see it with my own eyes. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 09:24:09 am
My main issue with Lovie is his relationship with Angelo.  Somehow the talent Angelo is acquiring is not getting developed by Lovie.

Or, is Angelo drafting players who simply aren't good enough?  The number of Angelo draftees who aren't even in the league after only 4-5 years (as Sportster identified) would lend credence to that argument.

The reality is that neither our personnel staff nor our coaches (except Tice and Toub) are really that good at what they do, and would have already been replaced on a team with competent, pro-active ownership (which the Bears also lack).

As for the assertion that Lovie's teams play "fast and hard", we'll have to agree to disagree on that.  The Bears I see more often than not, do not match the game speed or intensity of their opponent and they make a maddening number of mental errors (penalities, blown coverages, wrong routes, drops, etc.) reflecting either a lack of focus or basic football intelligence.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 26, 2011, 10:07:25 am

How can you praise Toub and Tice and leave out Marinellli?  In his first year as DC for the Bears he led them to a top 5 finiish.  I go back and forth with Tice.  If he can turn around our offensive line this season I'll be in his court.  In fact, I might be lobbying him to be our next OC.
 
Bears play hard - I"ve rarely questioned their intensity, especially on defense.  I think your are too critical of the players with your comments about mistakes  - they're biggest problem is that they are just not as talented as some of the top teams in the league, especially on offense.


Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on August 26, 2011, 10:14:17 am
How can you praise Toub and Tice and leave out Marinellli?

Agree again!  The jury is still out on the o-line but Tice gets praises?  Let's see how the season goes before giving him that undying love.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 26, 2011, 10:26:45 am
Tice's guys seem to improve in most cases(Louis,Webb,Williams), that is more than we can say for some of the other OL coaches we have had in some time.

Our last good line (Tait,?,Kreutz,Brown,Miller) were mostly FAs. We've not developed many OL the past several years.
I'd love to get to where a lot of good teams do and pick up guys in the 3-5 rounds every year and they are solid starters in 2 years. That makes for a good cheap OL. I might be wrong but if Webb,Williams and Carimi keep getting better our tackles and LG at least might be set for the next 5+ years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 10:33:14 am
Bears play hard - I"ve rarely questioned their intensity, especially on defense.  I think your are too critical of the players with your comments about mistakes  - they're biggest problem is that they are just not as talented as some of the top teams in the league, especially on offense.

The big beef I have with our D is that they tend to collapse in the 2nd half.  Yes, they play with intensity in the 1st quarter but how often is that same intensity lacking come crunch time in the 2nd half.  We've seen so many games where we let the other team make up a sizable deficit in the 2nd half and either make the game a much closer win than it could have been, or steal the win from us outright.

OTOH, our inept offense may have a lot to do with that for making the D play too many snaps.

I would just like to see all three units of this team show up to play ... for 4 quarters ... than we have seen in the past.  I think that alone would go a long ways toward earning the Bears more respect.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 26, 2011, 10:36:05 am
Its just cheap JA's way to build a line so he doesnt have to pay a guy. "Hey look what I did with a 7th round pick and a 6th round pick. You dont need 1st rounders at every position. If you did you'd have to pay them too much or they'd leave. This way they stay, greatful they have a job and work for cheap money. I like that"
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 26, 2011, 10:43:01 am
if we could build a line with late 1st or 2nd rounders, you could build a cheap line that would be solid.
We haven't been able to build a line with the 5th+ rounders we have been collecting over the years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 26, 2011, 10:50:41 am
At this point for all my whining I must say the Bears have a better line than the Eggles.  Vick was pretty much used as a punching bag from what I saw.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 11:05:26 am
if we could build a line with late 1st or 2nd rounders, you could build a cheap line that would be solid.
We haven't been able to build a line with the 5th+ rounders we have been collecting over the years.

Unless I'm forgetting someone, we really haven't had a single decent O-Lineman in recent history who was drafted any lower than the 3rd round (Kreutz).

Upper to mid -1st round for a LT, mid-1st to mid-2nd for a RT and rounds 2 and 3 for interior OL seems to be where you hit the delta of quality and price more often than not.

Not that there haven't been plenty of high-round busts and a few low-round success stories throughout the league, but as a general rule it certainly does seem like you get what you pay for on OL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 11:47:03 am
Chico getting a rude wake-up call in Carolina:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/26/ron-rivera-very-concerned-about-panthers-defense/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on August 26, 2011, 11:47:46 am
When Hatley was here he drafted an O-lineman in the 3rd round every single year.  Back then our Line was not great but it was a heck of a lot better then it has been recently.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 26, 2011, 12:32:58 pm
Lovie is a mediocre coach who has a decent staff around him. Taub is probably the best at what he does. Marinelli is one of the top Dline coaches in the league. Tice...well the poor guy is trying to get a Volkwagen Bug to run like a Lamborghini. They are not and have not given the guy much to work with. The biggest problem is Angie. Change him,draft right,you've got yourself a team....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 12:41:54 pm
Here is how I would personally rank Lovie's staff  (in order from most to least capable):

Toub (ST)
Tice (OL)
Marinelli (DL/DC)
DeFord (TE)
Martz (OC)
Spencer (RB)
Babich (LB)
Hoke (DB)
Drake (WR)

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 26, 2011, 12:48:11 pm
I think Babich is pretty good.
I mean having Urlacher and Briggs helps but when he has had other guys step up they seem to fill in well usually.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 01:03:18 pm
Yeah...  as I think about it more...  Babich is probably better at his job than Martz has been at his.

Babich was horrific in his stint as DC so that may have clouded my thinking.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 01:04:36 pm
Stepping away briefly to bigger matters...

All the best to any of you who are out on the East Coast right now.  Sounds like it could be a challenging weekend and I hope you all come out of it OK. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 26, 2011, 01:14:42 pm
Yeah it sure looks like a nasty one with new england getting the brunt
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 01:22:52 pm
It seems to me like major metro areas like NYC could be catching a small break in the fact that the brunt of the storm will hit over the weekend vs. a business day (when potentially millions of people would be concentrated in the business districts).  But maybe that doesn't make that much difference.

I see where NYC mass transit will be shutting down at noon tomorrow so it's gonna be a logistical nightmare no matter what.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on August 26, 2011, 01:27:55 pm
Irene will likely lose strength when she hits land...

But these things are so unpredictable.

The media has succeeded in creating a panic - all the water and batteries are wiped out.

We've had alot of rain already this month = that is the danger if this one hangs around for awhile
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 26, 2011, 01:37:00 pm
The media has wore this storm out, and it hasn't even hit. Looks like I'll be right on the fringe, little rain, little wind..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 01:37:55 pm
The media has succeeded in creating a panic - all the water and batteries are wiped out.

Yes and I'm sure gas prices are going up right on schedule, too.  They have been here this week, anyway.  Or maybe they're just getting a jump on the Labor Day gouge.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 26, 2011, 01:38:26 pm
I just pulled a packy, got the ticket for $204.00 and nfl to go for free. Shouldn't have doubted the old buzzard...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 26, 2011, 02:12:39 pm
Well the good news is they are replacing the field at Soldier Field.  The bad news is they are replacing it with more grass.  And it is only August.  Sigh...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 02:16:37 pm
Some sod company must have a sweetheart deal with the Parks District.

That's the only reason I can see that Soldier Field didn't go to FieldTurf years ago.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on August 26, 2011, 03:01:29 pm
City of Chicago politics for sure. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 26, 2011, 03:18:13 pm
Some sod company must have a sweetheart deal with the Parks District.

That's the only reason I can see that Soldier Field didn't go to FieldTurf years ago.

There is a different twist to it this time. It isnt the sod company the Park District has been using. And some professor from Pa. is to consult. The guy does this for 10 other stadiums so hopefully at least some of the problems will get corrected
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 03:29:49 pm
There is a different twist to it this time. It isnt the sod company the Park District has been using. And some professor from Pa. is to consult. The guy does this for 10 other stadiums so hopefully at least some of the problems will get corrected

This would be a great issue for the new McCaskey in charge (George?) to insert himself into and demand that the Solider Field playing surface be brought up to NFL standard in time for the first regular season home game.  A lot of Bears fans (myself included) believe nothing has changed with a new McCaskey in charge...  effecting a substantial and lasting improvement to Soldier Field would go a long way toward refuting that assumption. Not to mention adding value to the franchise and reducing the risk of injury to our players.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 26, 2011, 03:39:40 pm
It's beyond me how you field one of the most popular teams in football, and put 'em on a sh!t field like they've been doing. They were shamed into doing something. Don't forget, other teams have to come and play on that sh!t, could've been pressure put on by the league..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 03:57:18 pm
It's beyond me how you field one of the most popular teams in football, and put 'em on a sh!t field like they've been doing.

On top of which, you build an entire team (offense, defense and STs) based on speed and then put them for 8 games a year on a playing surface that completely negates that advantage.  That's the thing I really don't get. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 26, 2011, 03:58:56 pm
Everything I have read says the bears decide what the turf is made of.
Everything I've read also says for now the bears want grass because studies show it is safer and gives them a homefield advantage.

unsure the studies include soldier field though :-)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 04:09:46 pm
Everything I have read says the bears decide what the turf is made of.
Everything I've read also says for now the bears want grass because studies show it is safer and gives them a homefield advantage.

unsure the studies include soldier field though :-)

All I know is that when the face of your franchise (Brian Urlacher) goes public multiple times saying he hates his home field, that might be something you'd want to take seriously and do something about.

But I'm not a gazillionaire with an Ivy League education so what do I know? 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 26, 2011, 04:55:44 pm
Here is the article in its entirety for those of you out of town

Soldier Field to install new field for Bears' home opener

5:59 p.m. CDT, August 25, 2011

Soldier Field officials say they're working with the Bears to make sure a new field is installed in time for the team's Sept. 11 home opener against the Atlanta Falcons.

The Bears canceled a practice earlier this month because the field's turf was deemed unsafe for players. On Thursday, officials with Soldier Field said they're working with a vendor preferred by the team and an agronomist to install a new natural grass field.

The field will be installed over Labor Day weekend. Officials say it "will best suit the team and will ensure the players' comfort."

The Park District says stadium management has been working with Penn State professor Dr. Andrew McNitt since March and will continue through the season. He consults with 10 other NFL stadiums.

In addition to Dr. McNitt, Soldier Field has asked Ed Margan, the NFL's Super Bowl groundskeeper, to lend his expertise to the re-sod that is to take place prior to the regular season. 

"While we are comfortable with our existing vendor, we respect the Chicago Bears' wishes," said Tim LeFevour, Soldier Field's General Manager, said in a press release. "Keeping in mind the upcoming High School Kick Off and Chicago Football Classic games that are scheduled for the next two weeks, the best outcome would be to work with the Bears on their choice of vendor while also giving these young players the chance to live out a dream of playing on a professional field."

The field is owned and maintained by the Chicago Park District. The Bears have a lease to play there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 26, 2011, 04:58:28 pm
On Thursday, officials with Soldier Field said they're working with a vendor preferred by the team

Translation:  A vendor that kicked a bunch of $$ back to the McCaskeys...

Bottom line is, we won't know if this in actual improvement till sometime after first frost. Soldier Field has traditionally been passable (if barely) till about mid-October and then things start to go downhill and from Thanksgiving on it's virtually unplayable.  We'll see if it's any better this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on August 27, 2011, 04:44:03 am
 MEANWHILE BACK AT THE RANCH ...

 DEFENSE!
 

 DEFENSE!!
 

 DEFENSE!!!

 When these people at Halas Hall finally figure out theres TWO sides to the ball ...

 yer gonna shiiiit****.  ;)

 I admire Aaron Rodgers because he is a great Defensive Tackle ... and we need more !!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on August 27, 2011, 07:26:30 am
Packy - thanks for that picture, it is now my background.

Also, time for me to call DTV and see what is up.  CFinVA - Is this your first time owning the ticket??  What number did you call?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 27, 2011, 09:40:52 am
Wednesday they are upgrading my Dish to HD. Be nice to see Bears football in HD
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 27, 2011, 09:59:42 am
CFinVA - Is this your first time owning the ticket??  What number did you call?

Nope, I've had the ticket for years. I called the number on my bill, told 'em I wanted to cancel the ticket. They then hooked me  up with the "ticket cancel person". I was prepared to cancel it if it came down to it. I told him it was too high and I was broke. He started by giving me the ticket to go and knock 5 bucks a month off, I pretty much scoffed at that one. He then offered 10 bucks a month off, I still wasn't take the bait. He finally offered to take off 20 bucks a month and the ticket to go, I took it. If I wouldn't have called, it was going to cost me close to $400, fukk that...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: ailen laguda on August 27, 2011, 10:54:16 am
I really love Chicago Bears.. Hope to see them again in their next great game...


_________________________
Watch Chicago Bears' games in your PC: www.NFLTVGAMES.COM (http://www.NFLTVGAMES.COM)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 27, 2011, 02:52:49 pm

spammer!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on August 29, 2011, 07:07:45 am
Bears backup tight end Desmond Clark indicated the knee injury he suffered in Saturday's preseason game against Tennessee wasn't as bad as it appeared to be, posting on Twitter that he's confident he will return soon according to the Chicago Tribune.

Clark left the field on a cart in the fourth quarter after taking a brutal hit to the left knee from Titans safety Anthony Smith while trying to make a catch. On Sunday, he posted on Twitter, "Took quite a shot out there but feeling confident I'll be ok and back on the field soon."

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 29, 2011, 07:24:42 am
That's good news! I hope he's right..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on August 29, 2011, 07:34:55 am
that's great!  It looked bad
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 29, 2011, 07:39:59 am
Looked like season ending hit to me, maybe career ending when it happened if you consider his age
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 29, 2011, 11:35:07 am
Chester Taylor heading out:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-release-rb-chester-taylor-20110829,0,5799182.story?page=1

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on August 29, 2011, 11:38:51 am
Guess that means the Barber injury is not serious
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 29, 2011, 11:43:08 am
Can you believe they paid him 7 mil last season. No wonder Forte wants a new contract..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 29, 2011, 11:57:18 am
when Taylor was playing well, he is the type of back we need, kind of like Forte.
Can block well, run well and catch passes out of the backfield well.
He was insurance in case Forte didn't recover from his sophomore slump.

He was just already burned out it seems.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 29, 2011, 12:16:13 pm
I figured Taylor was a goner. No surprise
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 29, 2011, 12:23:21 pm
Soooo, can we assume Roy is next in the flooded launch tube, with the outer door open? The firing solution being anywhere away from the Bears?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 29, 2011, 12:28:13 pm
Agreed that if we're dumping Taylor now, they must not consider Barber's injury from the other night to be serious.

It also occurs to me this could be the reason why Martz hasn't opened up the playbook yet.  He doesn't want guys like Taylor possibly signing with other teams and leaking those plays to their new employer.

The other RB on the bubble is Unga... did he play against the Titans?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on August 29, 2011, 12:35:08 pm
I don't think that Roy will be cut.  They still dream of his returning to his early stardom.

And they don't have anyone else.  Besides Bennett, they have no one that can play the disciplined game that is necessary in their system.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 29, 2011, 12:48:14 pm
Gholston was cut too.

His work ethic has always been in question and I would suspect Marinelli had seen enough.

Hard to feel too sorry for the guy though...  he made enough from his rookie contract with the Jets that if he has the financial sense God gave a fly, he's set for life.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 29, 2011, 01:18:20 pm
Is this guy better than Spencer?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/29/cowboys-cut-andre-gurode/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 29, 2011, 01:44:56 pm
Last I heard Unga is still out on personal business.  With Taylor now gone he might have had a chance.

Andre Gurode is probably better than both our centers but at 32 I'm not sure he'd be a good fit for the Bears considering who we have now.  Gurode was asked to take a pay cut and declined.  He has been pretty much been beaten out by a rookie FA, who is now injured.  Gurode could have been the starter but as soon as the rook came back he'd be benched and Cowboys didn't want to pay him starter money.

Too bad about Gholston.  With his departure I think the d-line is set...almost.  I think they believe Wooten will be back early in the season, maybe even game 1.   There temporary insurance policy at DE is either Henry Melton or surprise...Marcus Harrison.   I think there is a good chance he makes the roster.  That would mean 6 DTs:  Melton, Toeaina, Adams, Okoye, Paea, and Harrison.

I didn't see enough good things out of Addison - I think he's headed to the PS.  Reed showed some burt too.

As for Roy Williams, he's not getting cut.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 29, 2011, 02:04:36 pm
Marcus Harrison has done everything but asked outright to be cut from this team.  He is out of shape every year coming in to camp, and rarely does much of anything on game day.  He might make the roster (again), but I would have to think that is only to spare Angelo the humiliation of having three 3rd-round picks at the same position ALL wash out (Dvoracek and Gilbert being the other 2).  Only a Lovie Smith team would allocate six roster spots to DT, but stranger things have happened.

Dallas, thanks for the info on Gurode.  At 32 that's older than if we had just kept Kreutz. I didn't know Gurode had that much mileage on him. Probably better to hold on to [the much younger] Spencer and see what Tice can do with him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on August 29, 2011, 03:13:21 pm
Whatever happened to that other Dallas receiver we signed?  He was about 5th on their depth chart but when I was talking with some co-workers from Dallas they said he had shown some flashes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 29, 2011, 03:16:44 pm
Whatever happened to that other Dallas receiver we signed?  He was about 5th on their depth chart but when I was talking with some co-workers from Dallas they said he had shown some flashes.

Sam Hurd.  I think he's been hurt or something.

Meanwhile, now the Tribune is reporting Chester Taylor may not have been cut after all. I swear, this Halas Hall crew can't find its azz with both hands.

Re Unga, we need to shiit or get off the pot.  Who knows what's going on there but my guess would be potentially serious health issues with either his new baby or the mom (possibly even post-partum depression). In any event teams don't grant healthy players this much time off from training camp for just any little thing.  Isn't there some kind of roster status you can assign a guy that you want to protect on the roster but is not participating with the team for reasons other than medical?  "Reserve / Non Injury" or something like that, IIRC.  His situation is bizarre to say the least but there appears to a potentially solid football player there if he can ever get focused on football. We've already pi$$ed his whole preseason down the leg but it would be nice if we could hang on to him without exposing him on the practice squad.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 29, 2011, 03:20:38 pm
Not surprised about Gholston either. There were rumors that the Bears might be interested in a DE should the right one get cut by a team trying to get down to 45.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 29, 2011, 03:41:19 pm

The final cut is 53.  45 is the number of actives on game day.

I think I've got my 53 man roster figured out - most of you should be able to fill in the names:

QB(3)
HB(3)
FB(2)
TE(3)
T(3)
G(3)
C(2)
WR(6)

DE(3)
DT(6)
MLB(2)
OLB(4)
CB(6)
S(4)

STs(3)

My bubble guys are QB Enderlie, DT Marcus Harrison and MLB DeCiccio.  If Enderlie stinks it up Thursday then they might be able to stash him on the PS.   Levi Horn is the odd man out...I think they might try to save him (to replace Omiyale next year).  I have to leave Unga out for now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 29, 2011, 03:51:50 pm
I hope we can find a way to keep Levi Horn.  I know they would have to keep 4 OTs in that event but I think Tice is very high on him and I don't see any way he lasts on the PS again this year after some solid showings this preseason. 

2 FBs really feels like one too many (especially in the Martz offense), and that may be where we could make room for Horn.  I'm thinking he makes the 53 but won't always dress on game day.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 29, 2011, 04:14:47 pm

TE/FB positions still up in the air.  Kyle Adams makes the team either as the 3rd or 4th TE or 2nd FB.  May depend on Clark's status and whether they decide to keep any of the other legit FBs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 29, 2011, 05:04:16 pm
I just dont see any FB making it eventhough Eddie Williams has had a good training camp. The Bears like this kid from Purdue, because although he was a TE in college he can do lots of other things. They line him up as an H back which is what Maleuna (sp) was.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on August 29, 2011, 05:48:02 pm
More confusion at Halas,surprise surprise...You're not in our plans but you're still on the team....huh? WTH is wrong with this moron staff? Take delivery of more stupid pills?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on August 29, 2011, 08:03:49 pm
I personally think Lovie told C. Taylor your gone.  He tells Angelo...who says **** that's leverage for Forte...we need to keep him around to help with negotiations.  Maybe...I don't know.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 30, 2011, 06:37:34 am
Forte knows that Taylor is no insurance.
Now Marion Barber might be a different story. I'm glad we picked him up.
I think Tashard Choice might e available. He might be a good pick up too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 30, 2011, 08:30:54 am
I think what happened with Chester Taylor was, somebody told the front office that Barber's injury wasn't serious so the front office decided to drop the axe on Taylor, then they looked at Barber more closely and realized his injury is more serious.

Taylor's not in competition with Forte, he's in competition with Barber.  If there's a question on the severity of Barber's injury then it's smart to keep Taylor around a little longer and I think that's what's going on.

Which still doesn't mean all of Halas Hall isn't a clusterf-uck, because it clearly is. And considering our personnel staff and medical team are all largely incompetent and incapable of working together, not a surprise at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on August 30, 2011, 09:32:18 am

Or....

maybe with the 4th PS game coming up Thursday they knew they weren't going to use Forte.   Barber's banged up and probably won't play.  Maybe they want Chester to eat up some carries and showcase him to the league in case somebody loses a HB and needs a vet for a 7th round pick?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 30, 2011, 10:11:04 am
Maybe they want Chester to eat up some carries and showcase him to the league in case somebody loses a HB and needs a vet for a 7th round pick?

Could be...  although, I was thinking that's what they were doing in the 2nd game already when he got a lot of reps with the 1's, ahead of Barber.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 31, 2011, 07:35:53 am
How do you misunderstand being cut? Lovie says he didn't tell him he was cut.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 31, 2011, 07:36:34 am
I see Brown is interested in coming back to the Bears..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 31, 2011, 08:39:39 am
I see Brown is interested in coming back to the Bears..

No thanks. That was a rare case where we actually got rid of a guy at the right time rather than hanging on to him too long.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on August 31, 2011, 09:30:18 am
He'd be nothing more than insurance..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 31, 2011, 09:47:33 am
We needed him last year, but not now we dont.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on August 31, 2011, 09:51:56 am
If Wooten would be out an extended period of time then he might be good insurance.
He isn't going to beat many Tackles anymore but he isn't likely to get burned either.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on August 31, 2011, 10:06:42 am
uh - Taylors gone right?  Hope so, because here in Tn they announced they signed him.  I adore rooting for a team that's owned and operated by class a buffoons.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on August 31, 2011, 10:17:26 am
I havent heard he is gone. He practiced with the Bears yesterday. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 31, 2011, 10:19:34 am
uh - Taylors gone right?  Hope so, because here in Tn they announced they signed him.  I adore rooting for a team that's owned and operated by class a buffoons.

The Bears are definitely right down there in the Bengals / Raiders / Bills tier of front office ineptitude.  When the freakin Lions have things more together in their organization than the Bears do, something is really wrong.

Not impressed with the "leadership" I've seen from the new McCaskey at all.  But then did anybody really expect anything to change?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on August 31, 2011, 11:40:13 am
But at least we didn't wind up with this guy:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/31/seahawks-may-bench-first-round-pick-carpenter/

Truth be told, I was ecstatic when this pick for the Seahawks was announced.  I figured they'd jump on Carimi and when they chose this guy instead I knew our odds of getting Carimi had just improved a lot.

KC deserves a Christmas card for passing on Carimi as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 02, 2011, 09:07:21 am
This is not something we need right now

Briggs, agent formally ask Bears for trade
Agent asks Bears front office for permission to seek trade for LB
 
By Vaughn McClure, Tribune reporter
 
6:00 a.m. CDT, September 2, 2011
Agent Drew Rosenhaus has filed a formal request to seek a trade on behalf of Lance Briggs, the Bears linebacker told the Tribune.

"The Bears made their decision, now I have to make mine," Briggs said. "It's just how the business works. It's not going to take away from what I do on the field. I'm 100 percent a Bear, until I'm not a Bear anymore."

The six-time Pro Bowl selection recently approached the Bears about a raise, but upper management has not budged. Rosenhaus made the trade request via an email to contract negotiator Cliff Stein.

The Bears had no comment on the issue Thursday, and their stance on the trade request remains unclear. They are about $19.3million below this season's salary cap.

If they were to grant him permission to seek a trade, Briggs and his agent could approach other teams to see if something could be worked out.

Briggs has three years left on his contract and is scheduled to make $3.9 million this season (including bonuses), $4 million in 2012 and $6.5 million in 2013. He signed a six-year, $36 million deal in 2008 after first testing the free-agent market, and the maximum value of the first three years was $21.6 million.

Briggs wants the Bears to restructure his contract in a manner that would increase his salary this season, possibly by flip-flopping the $3.9 million with the $6.5 million in the final year.

Briggs approached the Bears after watching younger, less proven linebackers around the league sign lucrative deals.

In comparison with a pair of top veteran 4-3 outside linebackers -- the Broncos' D.J. Williams and the Jaguars' Daryl Smith -- Briggs, 30, has a point. Williams has a base salary of $4.9million this season with three years left on his deal, while Smith's base is $4.2million with two years remaining. Both players are 29, and neither has been selected to a Pro Bowl.

General manager Jerry Angelo declined to discuss Briggs' request when first approached about the matter Saturday. Briggs was willing to wait until after the season before seeking a trade but changed his mind after meeting with Angelo on Sunday.

"I understand and respect their decision," Briggs said.

Coach Lovie Smith addressed Briggs' contract status earlier this week.

"If a guy has something that he needs to do, then he can deal with it off the field," Smith said. "As far as how I see him, I just see him coming to work every day, like he has done. Lance Briggs has to get ready for the football season, which he has done.

"Who doesn't want a new contract? All of us would want a new contract. But still, you go to work every day and do your job, and that's what he's doing. I have no complaints about him."

Briggs isn't the first veteran linebacker to approach the team about a raise. Brian Urlacher was given a one-year extension three years ago, when he was 30, that included $18million in new money. However, Urlacher was considered a special circumstance as the face of the franchise and continues to perform at a high level.

Briggs has performed at a high level also, leading the team in tackles two of the last three seasons. He is one of four linebackers to be selected to six consecutive Pro Bowls in franchise history, joining Dick Butkus, Bill George and Mike Singletary.

When Briggs had contract issues in 2007, he went public and vowed never to play for the Bears again before signing a one-year, $7.2 million franchise tender. The Bears and 49ers apparently discussed a trade that season. Subsequently, the 49ers were found guilty of tampering with Briggs through Rosenhaus and were penalized with the loss of their fifth-round draft pick and had to swap their third-round spot with the Bears.

The last time Rosenhaus approached the Bears seeking a trade, it resulted in tight end Greg Olsen being shipped to the Panthers for a third-round pick.

Briggs, who is recovering from a knee bruise, said the injury and his contract status are unrelated. He did not play in Thursday night's exhibition finale but vowed to be ready for the regular season.

vxmcclure@tribune.com
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 02, 2011, 09:14:49 am
Angelo should tell Rosenhaus to go for it but that any offer lower than a 2nd round pick in 2012 will be rejected out of hand.

I very highly doubt any team will pony that up for Briggs so that should effectively put an end to that nonsense.

We are going to have to totally rebuild the LB unit in the next 2-3 years and it would stink to lose Briggs before then but LBs are among the easier positions on a team to replace, and definitely a position where you can cut costs vs. rush DEs or cover CBs.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 02, 2011, 09:31:04 am
Bears escape the game with no serious injuries

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0902-bears-browns-chicago--20110902,0,3772120.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 02, 2011, 10:04:52 am
I'm not sure Robert Hughes escapes if we try to stash him on the practice squad. Dude is 5'11, 235 and runs with bad intentions.

OTOH what do we do with Unga (did he play last night)?

I wonder if we could keep 4 RBs on the 53 (Forte, Barber, Bell and Hughes), and put Unga on the Reserve / Non-Football Injury list based on whatever personal issues have been keeping him out of action this preseason.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 02, 2011, 10:24:31 am
I love those big guys that can run.
People were giving Major Wright a hard time for missing a tackle on Brandon Jacobs, He runs over a lot of guys.

I was watching one game the other night(Bears/Titans?), I forget which team but I think the guys name was Harper. He was putting a licking on folks and had good agility. He hurdled over one guy who was trying to tackle him low for a big game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BillSharp on September 02, 2011, 10:36:20 am
Unga put on some reserved/retired list. Seems he just left the team.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 02, 2011, 11:04:46 am
I'm not sure Robert Hughes escapes if we try to stash him on the practice squad. Dude is 5'11, 235 and runs with bad intentions.

OTOH what do we do with Unga (did he play last night)?

I wonder if we could keep 4 RBs on the 53 (Forte, Barber, Bell and Hughes), and put Unga on the Reserve / Non-Football Injury list based on whatever personal issues have been keeping him out of action this preseason.

Haven't seen last night's game.  HB situation depends on health of Barber and Bell.  If both are OK they could make room for a 4th HB (like last year) but could come at the cost of a FB or TE.

My guess is that Hughes goes on PS but again I didn't catch the game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 02, 2011, 11:18:17 am
In regards to the Briggs issue, it's totally ridiculous. So ya give more money this year, what happens next year when there's another Lb'er making more money? Another contract? He's a good backer, but somewhere along the line, you have to put yur foot down. This is a big year for all these guys to prove some consistency, something they haven't done in the past. Last year the D was decent, the year before they sucked. I'm sick of the whole ME attitude..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 02, 2011, 11:59:21 am
Unga put on some reserved/retired list. Seems he just left the team.

That's just wack. I know it was only a 7th round pick but damn, didn't Angelo do any research on this guy at all?  The kid appears to have pro skills but clearly the mentality isn't there.  Or he saw what a cluster the Bears organiziation is and decided he'd had enough already.

Now next year watch him sign with the Patriots and go to the Pro Bowl.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 02, 2011, 12:12:22 pm
If he does it would be with Bears compensation as he is Bear property until released I believe
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 02, 2011, 12:15:49 pm
Fantuz and Asiata among latest cuts:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-laptad-out-as-bears-begin-final-cutdown-process-20110902,0,5859398.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on September 02, 2011, 12:38:06 pm
Nice scouting report on the true go-to receiver (http://mattwaldmanrsp.com/2011/07/31/the-why-of-bears-wr-earl-bennett/) for the Bears.  And I don't think Cutler would argue.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 02, 2011, 12:50:55 pm
Great article, VJ.  Nice to see a Bears player gettin some love from an objective 3rd party observer.  That doesn't happen very often it seems.

One thing that watching those clips really does is re-inforce how awful our pass protection was last year.  That front 5 couldn't stop anyone. There's someone in Cutler's face on almost every one of those highlight throws, and/or he's throwing on the run.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 02, 2011, 01:10:45 pm
Also please don't forget the amount of money. Millions of dollars.  Millions.  Give him a raise, take the amount of the raise and donate it to somewhere. Think that will happen? Neither do I. Owners and players have at least one thing in common: greed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on September 02, 2011, 01:53:02 pm
Guys the requestl has been made, the task is hard, but the heavy lifting needs to be done...Let call the arms be loud and clear!

Free Lance Briggs! New England needs another veteran!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 02, 2011, 03:11:57 pm
We need Briggs worse than New England.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 02, 2011, 03:18:15 pm
New England could use a lot of water pumps about now.  And some Electricity.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on September 02, 2011, 03:35:51 pm
"Also take note of Bennett’s skill at adjusting to the football thrown high and behind him and he still quickly ducks under the oncoming defender after the catch. This is starter-caliber awareness of the zone and the open field. It’s a perfect example of a player who may not have great speed, but he processes information quickly and appears as if he playing one step ahead of his opposition. I’ll take that over track speed eight days a week."


Amen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 02, 2011, 03:49:06 pm
"Also take note of Bennett’s skill at adjusting to the football thrown high and behind him and he still quickly ducks under the oncoming defender after the catch. This is starter-caliber awareness of the zone and the open field. It’s a perfect example of a player who may not have great speed, but he processes information quickly and appears as if he playing one step ahead of his opposition. I’ll take that over track speed eight days a week."


Amen.

Yeah I was watching that play and thinking, if that were Roy Williams, best case would be he'd have whiffed on the catch altogether and worst case he would have tipped it to a DB for the INT.   Roy's "alligator arms" are so well known he might as well have an endorsement deal with LaCoste.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 02, 2011, 04:23:35 pm
Bears need to find a spot on the roster for Hughes. It's not often you find a back with his size and capabilities. We could use a big bruiser to get the hard yards...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 02, 2011, 04:26:01 pm
Bears need to find a spot on the roster for Hughes. It's not often you find a back with his size and capabilities. We could use a big bruiser to get the hard yards...

Especially now that Unga has apparently flaked.  Hughes clearly is the type of player we were trying to add by drafting Unga so I hope the kid gets a shot. He seems like the kind of player that could really make you regret letting him go down the line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 02, 2011, 04:44:10 pm
Somebody will call in their mark and grab Hughes. All he needs is the OLine, which he never had at ND.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 02, 2011, 08:12:08 pm
No surprises among first wave of cuts

 

By: Larry Mayer | Last Updated: 9/2/2011 12:05 PM

 

 

 


The Bears waived 14 players Friday, including guard Johan Asiata, fullback Eddie Williams, wide receivers Andy Fantuz and Onrea Jones, and linebacker Chris Johnson.
 
The group also included nine undrafted rookies: Linebackers Tressor Baptiste and Deron Minor, cornerbacks Antareis Bryan and Ryan Jones, tackle Josh Davis, punter Spencer Lanning, defensive end Jake Laptad, center Alex Linnenkohl, and receiver Jimmy Young.
 
The only player waived Friday who has played in a regular-season game for the Bears is Asiata, who appeared in the first two contests last year.
 
The Bears still must cut 13 more players by 5 p.m. Saturday to reach the NFL’s 53-man roster limit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 02, 2011, 08:13:00 pm
Briggs' agent requests a trade

 

By: Larry Mayer | Last Updated: 9/2/2011 3:21 PM

 

 

 


The Chicago Tribune is reporting that agent Drew Rosenhaus has filed a formal request to seek a trade on behalf of Lance Briggs.
 
The Bears linebacker has three years remaining on the six-year, $36 million deal he signed in 2008. The contract reportedly paid Briggs $21.6 million over the first three years.
 
“The Bears made their decision, now I have to make mine,” Briggs told the Tribune, referring to the team’s decision not to renegotiate the deal. “It’s just how the business works. It’s not going to take away from what I do on the field. I’m 100 percent a Bear, until I’m not a Bear anymore.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 03, 2011, 08:45:26 am
I’m 100 percent a Bear, until I’m not a Bear anymore.

Right Lance - your contract that you signed says you are a Bear for 3 more years - shut up and play!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 03, 2011, 10:51:57 am

Chester Taylor and Marcus Harrison cut.

These were the only two announced.  This gives them both a headstart on catching with other teams, I guess.

Harrison's release should pave the way for one of the DEs Addison or Reed or possibly another player at another position such as HB (Hughes) or the OT Levi Horn or one of the rook safeties.

Whatever happens after 5pm isn't set in stone.  Bears might be able to sign other team's PS castoffs to their 53 man roster. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 03, 2011, 10:55:05 am
It kind of seems like they really were yanking Chester Taylors chain.  First he is going to be cut, then not, then they want him to play the last game, now he is cut.  Doesnt look good for the organization.  I am sure they were just trying to trade him and get something, but it just seems like they were  yanking his chain.  Of course for $7 million last year, I guess they could do that.  ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 03, 2011, 12:17:26 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0903-pompei-bears-chicago--20110904,0,6529219.column

Pretty much sees it the way most of us here do as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 03, 2011, 12:33:10 pm
Report: Bears’ offer to Forte is $15 million guaranteed

 Posted by Michael David Smith on September 1, 2011, 6:55 AM EDT
 
AP
As of a couple weeks ago, the Bears and running back Matt Forte were thinking dramatically different numbers in negotiations for a contract extension. We don’t know exactly what Forte’s numbers are, but the Bears are reportedly offering $15 million guaranteed.
 
That number comes from Michael C. Wright of ESPN.com, who writes that a $15 million guarantee is in the neighborhood of what the Bears are asking Forte to sign up for.
 
There’s no word on the length of the deal or the total value, so it’s tough to gauge how that offer compares to other recent contracts for running backs. Frank Gore got $13.5 million guaranteed for a three-year deal with the 49ers. Ahmad Bradshaw got $9 million guaranteed for a four-year deal with the Giants. DeAngelo Williams got $21 million guaranteed for a five-year deal with the Panthers.
 
Forte obviously isn’t going to get DeAngelo Williams money, but the Bears have apparently offered him more than Frank Gore and Ahmad Bradshaw money. So far, Forte hasn’t accepted that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 03, 2011, 01:53:04 pm

At 6-1 248 Reed is NOT anywhere near the size of a 4-3 end - he's a 3-4 linebacker, maybe a 4-3 SLB.   I'd bet a 3-4 team would definitely claim him if he's cut.

Could he be a Rosevelt Colvin type player for the Bears...play SLB and put his hand down on 3rd down?

Somehow I think Addison would last on our PS.

There you go...convert Hughes to FB and Reed to SLB.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 03, 2011, 02:06:49 pm

Check that,  Hughes can play FB on the PS:

Also cut today: Former Notre Dame and Hubbard running back Robert Hughes, wide receiver Kris Adams, tight end Andre Smith, safety Anthony Walters, defensive tackle Jordan Miller and guard Ricky Henry.

The Bears must clear 10 more roster spots to reach the 53-man limit by the 5 p.m. deadline.


Safety Venable, Reed, Addison, Horn, Will T., LBs Trahan and DeCiccio and QB Enderlie still alive.  I think Kyle Adams and Sanzenbacher are locks.  Not so sure of TE Des Clark though.

And could the Bears roll the dice and stash Enderlie on the PS?

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 03, 2011, 03:31:21 pm
They tried that last year with a QB and it didnt work
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 03, 2011, 05:04:19 pm
JT Thomas has been put on injured reserve.  Yet another Angelo draft pick red shirted.

Also the Bengals have released Lefevor.

We should be hearing the final roster soon since the deadline has been reached.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 03, 2011, 05:15:16 pm
If they moaned and whined so much about losing Lefevor last year it woulldnt surprise me if they picked him back up
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 03, 2011, 05:16:05 pm
They cut Clark too
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on September 03, 2011, 05:19:35 pm
Final 53 (http://www.chicagobears.com/news/NewsStory.asp?story_id=8116)
 
Quarterbacks (3): Jay Cutler, Nathan Enderle, Caleb Hanie
 
Running backs (3): Marion Barber, Kahlil Bell, Matt Forte
 
Fullbacks (1): Will Ta’ufo’ou
 
Wide receivers (6): Earl Bennett, Devin Hester, Sam Hurd, Johnny Knox, Dane Sanzenbacher, Roy Williams
 
Tight ends (3): Kyle Adams, Kellen Davis, Matt Spaeth
 
Offensive linemen 8  Gabe Carimi, Roberto Garza, Lance Louis, Frank Omiyale, Chris Spencer, J’Marcus Webb, Chris Williams, Edwin Williams
 
Defensive linemen (10): Anthony Adams, Mario Addison, Israel Idonije, Henry Melton, Amobi Okoye, Stephen Paea, Julius Peppers, Nick Reed, Matt Toeaina, Corey Wootton
 
Linebackers (5): Lance Briggs, Dom DeCicco, Brian Iwuh, Nick Roach, Brian Urlacher
 
Cornerbacks (6): Zackary Bowman, Corey Graham, Tim Jennings, D.J. Moore, Joshua Moore, Charles Tillman
 
Safeties (5): Chris Conte, Chris Harris, Craig Steltz, Winston Venable, Major Wright
 
Specialists (3): Robbie Gould, Patrick Mannelly, Adam Podlesh
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 03, 2011, 05:23:31 pm
You beat me to it.  I was going to include this blurb also:

The Bears can establish an eight-man practice squad on Sunday and also can claim players who’ve been waived by other NFL teams. In past seasons, the Bears have typically stocked their practice squad primarily with players they released a day earlier during final cuts.

I have to say I like the roster.  That D-line is going to bring the pain this year.

I am ready for a fun year.  GO BEARS!!!


 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 03, 2011, 05:30:49 pm
5 DT's and 5 DE's.  Every single one of them I think deserves to be there except perhaps Paea but as a 2nd round pick you knew he was going to make the team.  I am kind of suprised they didn't IR him though.

It will be interesting to see if this is the team or if they are going to sign someone another team has cut.  Personally unless there is someone they feel is better at Safety, O-line or Corner I feel they should stick with what they have.

I would have taken the chance and put Enderle on the practice squad he has shown nothing that makes me think he can play this year.  Losing Lefevor last year probably made them gun shy on that though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on September 03, 2011, 05:32:58 pm
Cleveland game will be shown tomorrow 6CT/7ET (http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/networkschedule?selectedMonth=September&field=selectedDate&selectedDate=09%2F04%2F2011) on NFL network.

What's the word on DeCicco and Venable.  Did these dudes impress during the game or are they just players that Toub really really likes?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 03, 2011, 05:33:50 pm
I like the roster too. Kyle Adams is the TE from Purdue who was used as an H-back right?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 03, 2011, 05:53:28 pm
Wshful you are correct about Kyle Adams.

DeCicco is a safety they are converting to LB.  I think he is meant to be Urlachers replacement down the line.  This year he should be a pretty good special teams player.  He is pretty fast and big for a safety.  However he will need to bulk up to play MLB.  He has looked decent at LBer against back ups but not great.  He is still learning the position.  He is a heck of an athlete though.

Venable has made some plays but was mostly not noticed while I watched the pre-season games.  As a safety that is a good thing.

I love our RB's and D-line.  The O-line is most definately going to be better then last year.  They have been awesome run blocking and have gotten better each weak pass blocking.  Still concerned they will get owned when teams start mixing up the blitzes on them.

I think our secondary is a bit weak but the pass rush should help them out a lot.  If not big receivers are going to own them.

I can not wait for the season to start. 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 03, 2011, 06:11:01 pm
I heard this on the SCORE that Atlanta our first opponent come Sunday in a preseason game either #3 or #4 I am not sure which threw 43 times in the 1st half alone. I think thats kind of scary.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on September 03, 2011, 06:22:37 pm
Matt Ryan was slinging it in game 3.  Wasn't terribly effective against the Steelers however.

They are emphasizing the pass this year for sure after getting embarrassed by the Puke. 

Their O-line is solid but the starting center will be out for the season opener.  The Bears D-line will have their work cut out for them.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 03, 2011, 06:38:33 pm
They really screwed Taylor around. Great staff. Letting Hughes go was foolish,IMO.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 03, 2011, 06:40:55 pm
Well our vaulted pass rush better find 2nd gear against that line and get to Ryan because we will have a lot of trouble if Ryan has a lot of time to throw.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 03, 2011, 06:42:50 pm
There is a chance Hughes makes the practice squad. He didnt have a stellar career at ND went undrafted too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 03, 2011, 07:30:45 pm

Actually, the guy I thought might stick was Levi Horn.  He looked solid at RT the games I watched.

I have no opinion of Venable.  I'll catch the game on NFN tomorrow but safety play is difficult to evaluate on the screen.

Hughes ran a 4.8 40 - I think he might be safe on the PS.

5 DEs is quite a bit.  I'm thinking Wooten could be rested early on to let Addison and Reed battle it out with the loser getting cut.  Bears could then sign their 6th LB...unless Reed can play SLB.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 03, 2011, 08:33:33 pm
I was thinking we are usually heavier at LB than that. It doesn't leave much depth or many for ST.
I guess Reed is light enough of DE to play ST.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BillSharp on September 04, 2011, 04:45:11 am
Venable played well on special teams, that's how he made the team.

DeCicco played a lot & did well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 04, 2011, 06:51:44 am
Was thinking the same thing about Lefevre the QB we cut.  I know I didn't spell that right, but whatever.  The Bears can now decide between Lefevre and Enderle. 

I read that Sanzenbacher won't have a role on special teams, but will have to contribute as a specialist on the offense.  I am liking the possibility of him and Bennett on 3rd and 5, maybe sprinkly in either Hester or Knox for a deep threat to open it up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 04, 2011, 07:02:07 am
What to do about Briggs?  I realize that he is very talented, but he is also benefitted by playing the playmaker position of the scheme.  If we had a solid option to replace him, I guess now is the time to get value but I hate the thought of changing this now before game one.  Would much rather be having this headache heading into the offseason.  Briggs sees his clock ticking no doubt.  The Seattle linebacker would be anoption, not sure what he has left and why is no one picking up, that is a concern.

Regarding Forte, I applaud how he has handled his situation.  Doesn't have the talent of Chris Johnson down here in Nashville, but diesn't have the nickel brain either.  I think in the long term, Forte will have the longer career as he is better put together size wise.  This is someone I want us to lock up.  I have heard the comparisons to Marshall Faulk, but I think that is only because this is Martz offense.  The player I would like to see him become is Marcus Allen.  More of a strider, with a decent burst for a tall guy, a little shifty and a heck of a receiver.  Pay this guy, lock him up.  They have to be close to his number now, it is being reported $15 million signing bonus which is more than Gore but less than De Williams - stupid Panthers poisoned the market.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 04, 2011, 09:32:14 am
You do nothing with Briggs.  You tell him play or sit out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on September 04, 2011, 10:48:12 am
Bears sign Meriweather to one year deal.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 04, 2011, 10:55:32 am
Bears sign Brandon Meriweather

 Posted by Michael David Smith on September 4, 2011, 11:37 AM EDT
 
AP
It didn’t take Brandon Meriweather long to find a new team.
 
Less than 24 hours after the Patriots released Meriweather, he has signed with the Bears.
 
The Bears announced that they’ve signed the safety to a one-year contract. No word yet on how much he’ll be paid.
 
Meriweather played in all 16 games for the Patriots last year, starting 13, and he’s been chosen to the Pro Bowl each of the last two seasons.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 04, 2011, 10:56:07 am
Good signing.  I wonder who gets cut to make room or do they put Conte or Stelz on IR?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 04, 2011, 10:57:30 am
Bears land safety Meriweather

 

By: Larry Mayer | Last Updated: 9/4/2011 10:29 AM

 

 

 


The Bears on Sunday agreed to terms with Pro Bowl safety Brandon Meriweather on a one-year contract, one day after he was released by the New England Patriots.
 
Meriweather spent his first four NFL seasons with the Patriots after being selected by New England in the first round of the 2007 draft (24th overall) out of the University of Miami.
 






Brandon Meriweather
 
The 27-year-old played in all 64 regular-season games with 40 starts, recording 261 tackles and 12 interceptions, and was named to the Pro Bowl each of the past two seasons.
 
Both of the Bears’ second-string safeties exited Thursday night’s preseason finale with injuries; Craig Steltz hurt his hip and rookie third-round pick Chris Conte sustained a concussion.
 
Meriweather becomes the sixth player on the Bears roster who was drafted in the first round by another NFL team, joining Jay Cutler (Broncos), Julius Peppers (Panthers), Roy Williams (Lions), Chris Spencer (Seahawks) and Amobi Okoye (Texans).
 
The Bears do not have to make a corresponding roster move to make room for Meriweather until he officially signs his contract.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on September 04, 2011, 10:59:51 am
Wonder why his stock dropped in NE- they aren't known (lately) to give up on someone unless there are issues.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on September 04, 2011, 11:16:47 am
Brandon Meriweather...WOW!!

I was catching up on a couple of days posts and saw the roster.  I thought it looked good with the exception of thinking S looked weak (like usually).  Then saw we sign Meriweather.  Former 1st round draft pick who had started 64 games and 2 probowls...what has he done wrong lately???

He had a shooting incidence down in Apopka, FL a while ago, but supposely was trying to break up a fight. 

I am thinking we might have something special this year.  This guy MIGHT just be the final piece on our defense.

Another thought could Lance Briggs pick an absolute worse time to throw a ****-fit for the team.  Come on Lance put on your big boy pants and play out the season then try to work something out with a trade/new deal.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on September 04, 2011, 11:34:52 am
From the Boston Herald (http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/football/patriots/view.bg?articleid=1363405&srvc=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bostonherald%2Fsports%2Ffootball%2Fpatriots+%28N.E.+Patriots+-+Patriots+%26+NFL+-+BostonHerald.com%29)

During a busy day whittling their roster to the maximum of 53 players, the Patriots cut projected starting safety Brandon Meriweather. It was their biggest surprise, even as Meriweather’s tenuous standing with the team was not one.  A two-time Pro Bowler and 2007 first-rounder who collected 12 interceptions during his four seasons, Meriweather drew the ire of the coaches for his freelancing ways and drew the ire of the NFL for his head-hunting ways. The team, which has been scouring the NFL for safety help, tried to trade Meriweather yesterday before finally releasing him.

--------------------------

Belicheck doesn't take sh!t from anybody including pro-bowlers and is not afraid to let go of talent that don't fit his culture.  Maybe he thought that Meriweather was more focused on his rap career instead of his football career.  Low risk high reward.  A young hungry pro bowl player who is going to want to prove the Pats wrong and play for a long term deal.  I don't think this will be a defensive version of Moss.  I don't see any downside to this deal at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 04, 2011, 12:03:55 pm
Evidently Western Union still works and Mr. Meriweather would love to visit the musieums on a regular basis :).  Nothing wrong with a man with a bad attitude in the Bears secondary.  Nothing at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 04, 2011, 01:49:06 pm

What I read was that Merriweather wasn't disciplined within the Pat defense.  I think he had 5 picks in 2010 but might have blown  a few coverages too. 

In the Bears most of the time the safeties are not given the freedom to freelance.

One safety has to go.  I think I heard that Conti apparently should recover from the concussion.  Hadn't heard anything about Stelz.  Obviously if Stelz has a serious injury he's the guy that gets IRd.

If not, then it may have to be Venable to the PS.  I read up on him and it sounds like he's a headhunter and potential STs ace.  But scouting reports had him as a LB/SS tweener with limited ability in pass coverage.   You might be able to play him in special defenses where you need such a player but I'm not sure he has potential to start.

If you put him on the PS he might stick but there is also a good chance that one of the 31 other teams signs him as their 53rd player for STs only.

As for Merriweather, we might go back to a 3 man rotation like we had last year with Manning, which might please some who aren't quite sure Major Wright is ready.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 04, 2011, 03:16:28 pm
Roster Cutdowns - First of all, 10 D-linemen on the 53 is ridiculous. Addison, Reed or both could have been cut and resigned to the PS with no risk of loss.  Conversely we are super thin at LB with only 5 guys and the 2 backups not terribly good players at that. We could have given Addison or Reed's spot to a LB and been much better off but Marinelli is always gonna be at the top of the pecking order when it comes to the defensive roster, clearly. The only way I see this making sense is if Reed is gonna be some sort of hybrid LB/DL. On offense, I'm glad Kyle Adams survived but wondering why we kept a FB on top of that. Unless Ta'o'fu is just a lead-blocking / short yardage demon, kinda seems like a wasted spot a la Jason McKie. Five undrafted rookies making the 53 doesn't speak very highly of the players Angelo has been drafting but then that's pretty common knowledge already.

PS Signings - Glad we got Levi Horn back. Wish we would have made room for Hughes as I am ready to count Unga as a lost cause. I am incredulous we gave one of our PS spots to a DT when we have 10 D-Lineman on the 53 already. Kris Adams was a good save.

Merriweather - Meh. Usually when you get cut from the Pats in the prime of your career it's for a good reason... but it's also no surprise that Angelo thinks he's smarter than Belichick. This also tells me that the coaches thought Major Wright sucked as bad this preseason as I thought he did.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 04, 2011, 03:52:58 pm
Wow.  A bit negative don't you think?

The cover two depends heavily on the D-line.  No pressure from the D-line and the whole defensive concept can not work.  The only guy who does not really deserve to be on the roster is Paea.  However no way does he make it to the practice squad and they are going to give him at least a year to learn the pro game.  I really thought he would be put on IR.

Addison might have made it to the PS but I would put it at 50/50.  No way would Reed have made it and I am not even sure if he is illegable.  Reed is obviously going to be playing special teams and may be a third down pass rush specialist.  Addison will be on special teams as well.

We are thin at LBer.  However if the talent is not there why waste a roster spot.  I also think they may either sign someone if a LBer they like gets cut or they bring back what's his name from last year if he ever gets healthy.  We can not afford injuries at the LBer spot that is for sure.

Meriweather is a very talented safety.  The problem has been lack of effort in practice and free lancing.  Both are correctable.  If he does not come around he will be cut.  It is a one year deal.  Low risk, high reward.  I see no reason to not like this signing.  We need a ball hawking safety and that is what he is.  He will give up the big play occasionally due to gambling.  I prefer that over the guys we have had who gave up the big play while hardly ever making one.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 04, 2011, 04:17:36 pm
Chicago Bears practice squad:

WR Kris Adams, G Ricky Henry, T Levi Horn, DT Jordan Miller, TE Andre Smith, LB Patrick Trahan and S Anthony Walters.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 04, 2011, 04:21:06 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_258867&v=XwsESN-fSYk&feature=iv
 
A video to get everyone pumped for the season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 04, 2011, 05:44:13 pm
I am glad Andre Smith made it on the practice squad.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 04, 2011, 06:57:26 pm
I see they signed Armando Allen off the TB practice squad
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 04, 2011, 09:59:36 pm
Wow reading lots of not good stuff about Merriweather.  Dont know how fast he can pick up the system or contribute.  Maybe insurance for Major Wright, who has not really inspired confidence this offseason.  I like the idea of him, but Belicheck doesnt give up on guys who can play.  And Angelo aint the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree.  We shall see. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 04, 2011, 10:59:59 pm
Bears needed a healthy safety from somewhere.  He's a least as good as Steltz isn't he?  BB isn't Mr. football God.  Maybe he screwed up.  It's been known to happen
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 05, 2011, 12:38:16 am
10 D-linemen on the 53 is ridiculous.

Totally agree, Yapp. We have definate needs elsewhere. Cannot be getting ridiculous in one spot and forget the rest...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 05, 2011, 12:41:51 am

 OFFENSIVE LINE ? WE DONT NEED NO STINKIN OFFENSIVE LINE !  ::)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on September 05, 2011, 07:08:40 am
Time for predict the season game.  We need to set up new thread.  But to get the interest up.  Here is my bold prediction for season.

Falcons  W

@ Saints W

PACKERS L

Panthers  W

@ Lions  L

Vikings W

@ Bucs (London)  W

@ Eagles L

Lions W

Chargers W

@ Raiders W

Cheifs  W

@ Broncos  W

Seahawks  W

@ Packers  L

@ Vikings  W


12-4.  Definitely headed to playoffs.  I thought about giving Detriot 2 victories over us but found that thought highly unlikely.  Definitely think the back end of the schedule is easier than the front end.  Also week 1 will obviously be a tough game.  I think our oline dominants the run game and the dline sacks Matt Ryan at least 4 times.


Chicago 27  Atlanta 16
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 05, 2011, 11:34:54 am
16-14 Bears
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 05, 2011, 01:50:18 pm
17-10 Bears
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 05, 2011, 04:01:50 pm
27-24 Bears
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 05, 2011, 04:03:28 pm
I'm glad to see the excitement here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 05, 2011, 04:04:59 pm
Didnt practice for the Falcons begin today? And Sunday cant come soon enough. I'm pumped
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on September 05, 2011, 06:30:17 pm
Great posts, everyone.  Loved the video.

Bears 31
Falcons 27
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 05, 2011, 07:12:33 pm
I see no way the Falcons score 27 points against the Bears defense.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 05, 2011, 08:17:16 pm
20-17 Bears.

@ Saints L

PACKERS W

Panthers  W

@ Lions  L

Vikings W

@ Bucs (London)  W

@ Eagles L

Lions W

Chargers L

@ Raiders W

Cheifs  W

@ Broncos  L

Seahawks  W

@ Packers  L

@ Vikings  W


10-6 for the season for me....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 05, 2011, 08:25:56 pm
I see no way the Falcons score 27 points against the Bears defense.

I dont know about that. I would hope they dont but its possible if Ryan slings that ball all over the field. IMHO unless that pass rush was just vanilla during the preseason and we actually will blitz him then I could see them only scoring 24 which is what I predicted, but that is kinda iffy. I dont trust our secondary without a blitz package.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 05, 2011, 08:34:08 pm
The Bears have been playing vanilla.  They always play basic defense in the pre-season which is why they usually lose. 

When the Bears start blitzing along with the pressure they get just from the basic fornt four I think we will all be very happy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 05, 2011, 08:34:57 pm
Oh and 10-6 seems about right to me also.  If the Bears are 3-0 or 2-1 after the first three I may raise that bar though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 05, 2011, 09:20:10 pm
I really,really,really hope Roy Williams has been holding back. A killer big WR would be enormous for the Bear, coupled with (hopefully) a good O line. Everybody in the NFL is in first place right now, I hope Chicago can stay there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on September 05, 2011, 09:28:53 pm
10 and 6 is rather optimistic with the schedule they face.  9 and 7 is probably the most we can expect, unless some of their competition has serious injuries, while the Bears remain largely intact.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 05, 2011, 09:43:35 pm
I think you under estimate this team Dave.  You may very well end up being right but I see the potential for this team to be way better then last years.  Will the record show it?  Maybe not.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on September 05, 2011, 10:36:09 pm
I'm psyched!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on September 05, 2011, 11:35:40 pm
I think the team is better than last year.  But I think the schedule is much harder than last year.  Just about everything depends upon their DL and OL, and it is too early to tell how good they will be.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 06, 2011, 08:23:50 am
I hope Merriweather picks up the Bear defense quickly. Nice article

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0906-bears-side--20110906,0,2746670.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 06, 2011, 08:34:47 am
I see no way the Falcons score 27 points against the Bears defense.

I see no way the Bears score 17 against the Falcons Defense.

Feels like a lot of people are underestimating the Falcons here. Just to remind everyone, they were the #1 NFC seed in the playoffs last year, and won a strong division.  The fact that the eventual SB champs spanked them in the playoffs in no way diminishes the fact that this is a very good football team which has lost very few pieces from last year and arguably upgraded the ones they did  (e.g., Julio Jones > Michael Jenkins).

I think Bears drop the opener 23-13, followed by a much better showing the following week against the Saints.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 06, 2011, 08:37:32 am
Wow Yapper. I gotta think they can score at least 3 TDs
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 06, 2011, 08:39:19 am
Wow Yapper. I gotta think they can score at least 3 TDs

Gotta have an air game to do that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 06, 2011, 08:39:40 am
Another nice Meriweather article. He's saying all the right things.

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/7489097-606/safety-bet-brandon-meriweather-might-be-bears-best-****.html

Creataforum has aced the word g-a-m-b-l-e. I cant think of a better way to post this. Sorry. I just found it out and tried to fix it, but its hopeless unless Pekin can fix it
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 06, 2011, 08:41:05 am
Merriweather could be the missing link on this D if he can keep his mind right and will conform to the defensive system.  His physical abilities are considerable and he's only 27.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 06, 2011, 08:44:22 am
Gotta have an air game to do that.

True, but somehow I think the defense might put up 1 TD and Robbie is good for a couple of FGs. I believe we can pressure Ryan sufficiently provided we blitz.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 06, 2011, 08:45:47 am
Ryan will kill us if we blitz.

Front 4 pressure is the key, and presumably the reason we have 10 D-Linemen on the 53-man roster.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 06, 2011, 08:59:59 am
I am not convinced we can contain Ryan solely on front 4 pressure.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 06, 2011, 10:58:14 am
Not sure if this is a good or a bad thing.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/06/matt-forte-bears-cut-off-contract-talks/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 06, 2011, 11:23:19 am
What, Cutler's choice of headgear?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 06, 2011, 12:02:07 pm
What, Cutler's choice of headgear?

Yeah that's a pretty brutal picture I have to admit.

OTOH if Cutler comes out this year and throws 40 TDs to 18 INTs, he can practice in a tutu and ballet slippers for all I care.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 06, 2011, 01:49:50 pm

First concern for this game is protecting Cutler (especially with our young bookend tackles).   Last season John Abraham had 13 sacks and the Falcons swiped Ron Edwards (and his 8 sacks) from the Vikings.   That's about it for the Falcons pass rush though Jason Babineaux is pretty solid at DT.

2nd concern is getting to Ryan.  He was sacked only 23 times last year.  Sam Baker their LT will give up a few but their RT Clabo was a pro bowler.  I wish we had drafted Justin Blalock their RG,  but the Falcons our starting a LG and a C (due to injury) that have zero NFL starts.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 06, 2011, 01:54:51 pm
Do the Falcons play a 3-4 D?  If so we are in trouble.

Martz and his offense had no answer last year for 3-4 defenses and especially when those defenses included big, physical CBs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 06, 2011, 03:19:36 pm
I think I was being a bit too optimistic in my predictions. We're more likely to go 8-8. Lions are much improved and we've got a horrible schedule early on. We could start 0-3 very easily....and Atlanta could light us up quick.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 06, 2011, 03:38:45 pm
If Julio Jones is as billed to go along with Roddy White they're going to be lighting up a lot of teams
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 06, 2011, 03:56:37 pm
Yeah I think the Falcons are gonna give us a cold slap of reality on Sunday.  0-1

Then I think the Sunday after that, we'll wake up and put on a much better performance against the Saints, pulling out the win on the road. 1-1

Packers will continue owning us at Soldier Field, making us 0-2 for the season at home and the faithful very nervous. 1-2

Then we'll beat the Panthers (easily) and Lions (barely), taking us to 3-2 before our Sunday night game with the Vikes. 

That's how I see our first few games anyway. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 06, 2011, 04:55:55 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-going-without-fullback-after-waiving-taufoou-20110906,0,6170875.story

Interesting. I was wondering if there was ultimately going to be room on the roster for a guy who plays nothing but FB.

Looks like they may be opening a roster spot for a 6th LB...  assuming they can find one worth the spot... and that Kyle Adams will see the field sooner than later.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 06, 2011, 05:34:35 pm
Hmmm I thought they got rid of Joshua Moore to make room for Merriweather.  Wonder what this is for?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 06, 2011, 05:57:11 pm
I hadnt heard how they were going to juggle the roster to sign Meriweather. I was aware they had a FA safety on the PS who I was expecting them to cut
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 06, 2011, 06:53:12 pm

 KEY MATCHUP : Can Meriweather safety blitz? Dont know anything about the guy.

 Peppers on DE ... Paea DT ... up the middle ... Meriweather S on Safety blitz ...

 we could get somwhere with this. Just dont know.  ???
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: panthermark on September 06, 2011, 07:55:25 pm
We NEED a real FB.  A RB, an H-back and 3WR's don't work in the redzone.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 06, 2011, 08:00:41 pm
I dont believe a FB is needed if you have a big back such as Barber
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 06, 2011, 08:51:56 pm

Bears now have no FBs, 3 TEs and 3 HBs.  What about this new commitment to the running game?

A LB would appear to be a logical pick who knows?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 06, 2011, 08:53:49 pm
Kyle Adams is going to be the fullback, H-back, TE dude.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 06, 2011, 09:00:47 pm
there is also Spaeth. Imagine a 275lb FB :-)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 06, 2011, 09:59:29 pm

Spaeth is 6-6.

Last year the Bears were one of the worst short yardage teams and probably one of the few teams without a true FB.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 06, 2011, 10:10:39 pm
I think the team is better than last year. 

I don't know about that.  On offense they lose their best receiver in Olsen and also lost Kreutz who was the rock for the o-line.  They signed Roy Rogers, oops I meant Roy Williams to be their feature WR and he hasn't shown anything.  Just a matter of time before Knox wins back his starting position.

Now J'Marcus Webb is the starting LT can he handle the position? 

With Olsen gone we have question marks at TE.  Hell will Martz even utilize the TE's!!!

Then again Martz hasn't been sparkling.  He did a poor job in the last GB game of the regular season and in the playoffs against them.   He'll probably call that end around a few times Sunday for a yard gain.

So I honestly can't say the team is "better" than last year's bunch on offense especially with so many question marks.  The positives I see is at RB with Forte and Barber.  But now Barber is hurt so that means Forte will have to handle the bulk of the load come Sunday.

So I can't say the team is better.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on September 06, 2011, 10:55:23 pm
There are a lot of question marks on this team, which prevents them from being one of the elite teams in the league.

But there DL is going to be a lot better than last year, and it is very unlikely that they OL will be nearly as bad as they were in the first half of last year protecting the passer.  And they look quite good blocking for the run.

I hated to see Kreutz and Olson go, but neither of them were impact players last year, and were not likely to be so this year, in the Bear's scheme of things.  It is true that Williams hasn't shown anything, but it looks like Bennett is coming into his own this season, and Cutler loves to throw to him.

I think that if they had faced a schedule like this last year, they would have been a .500 team at best.  This year, I expect them to be a little over .500.

Time will tell.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 06, 2011, 11:55:58 pm
The Bears are like a box of chocolates...you just never know what your gonna get.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 07, 2011, 06:17:41 am
There are a lot of question marks on this team, which prevents them from being one of the elite teams in the league.

But there DL is going to be a lot better than last year, and it is very unlikely that they OL will be nearly as bad as they were in the first half of last year protecting the passer.  And they look quite good blocking for the run.

I hated to see Kreutz and Olson go, but neither of them were impact players last year, and were not likely to be so this year, in the Bear's scheme of things.  It is true that Williams hasn't shown anything, but it looks like Bennett is coming into his own this season, and Cutler loves to throw to him.

I think that if they had faced a schedule like this last year, they would have been a .500 team at best.  This year, I expect them to be a little over .500.

Time will tell.

I think you are spot on.  I think our defense, especially the line is going to be strong as long as we avoid key injuries.  I think Merriweather is a smart pick=up and solidifies the safety position.  But the defensive line is going to be tough and rotating in 4 tackles and keeping them fresh will be a huge advantage.  If Wooten returns and shows no ill effects from his knee injury, the ends will also be a strength.

The toughest one to see leave was Olsen, and Davis for all of his flashes has to put together a solid season.  He was invisible in the preseason.  Every one was ready to ship off Kreutz, until we were faced with shipping off Kreutz.  He was smart. tough, and the face of the offensive line.  He was also offered a very fair contract which he refused.  Regarding leadership, how many teams out there centers are considered the captain of the offense?  It is Cutler's time to lead or fail, this will utlimately be his opportunity to step up or continue to hear the Jeff George whispers.  I think so far he has responded, showing up in the best shape of his career.  With Kreutz out of the locker room and a young offense, this is Cutler's team to lead.

Also, consider me from Missouri - Roy, shut your mouth and show me.  Otherwise, take a seat.  I have seen the David Terrell, Muhsin Muhammad show on tv and I know how the story ends.  I just hope this isn't a rerun of those shows...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 07, 2011, 07:44:29 am
Wow! How do I add to whats been said but go Bears. We seem on paper to be stronger, at least defensively. Offensively there is the Olsen and Kreutz issues. I definitely see where Roy Williams could be a bust, but the rest of the WR corps is almost the same so I dont fear a letdown. Other than Williams the other addition is Sanzenbacher. I dont believe our WR corps could be any worse than last year. Our run game should be much improved. The line blocking should be much better with Manu gone. The big questionmark like last year is can the OLine pass block and protect Cutler and give him the time to get the ball where its supposed to go. This could be a very fun year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 07, 2011, 07:49:10 am
If Kreutz would've come back for another year, I would've been fine with that. But the guy is truly at the end of his career, and I won't miss those false starts..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 07, 2011, 08:02:22 am
If Kreutz would've come back for another year, I would've been fine with that. But the guy is truly at the end of his career, and I won't miss those false starts..

Not to mention, even in the preseason already it was clear we were getting much better push up the middle on running plays.

Also, assuming our new C can handle shotgun snaps, it opens up that option for us. Kreutz was high-risk in that department, but Cutler seems like the kind of QB who could make hay from the 'gun.

Kreutz has has to be viewed as addition by subtraction, IMHO. Especially for the coin he was demanding.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 07, 2011, 08:23:51 am
Griz you here the nfl forcasts on the local? Frank Wychek has the Packers winning " a layup".  ****.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 07, 2011, 08:56:30 am
Bears now have no FBs, 3 TEs and 3 HBs.  What about this new commitment to the running game?

A LB would appear to be a logical pick who knows?

We need a 6th LB, no question. Urlacher and/or Briggs are to an age they could go down at anytime and then we're really screwed. Also I'm sure Toub is lobbying for a 6th LB as that would presumably shore up the STs.

Re the RB/FB situation...  can anyone enlighten me on the implications of Unga's roster designation. I believe it is called "Reserve/Left Team". Is he required now to be inactive for some length of time or can we bring him on to the 53 at any time provided we make room by cutting someone else?  I'm not real comfortable going into another season without a true big back on our roster.  Barber runs big but we are already seeing the durability issues that pushed him out of Dallas.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 07, 2011, 08:58:16 am
It is Cutler's time to lead or fail, this will utlimately be his opportunity to step up or continue to hear the Jeff George whispers.  I think so far he has responded, showing up in the best shape of his career. 

I totally agree. Cutler took it upon himself to get in shape, fix his footwork and he also showed leadership in pulling the troops together for workouts during the lockout.  He's done all he can do.  Now the supporting cast needs to step up, and Martz needs to give him an offensive framework that will actually allow him to succeed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 07, 2011, 09:39:11 am
I think the D really needs some contribution from the secondary.  With the push up front, if we can start getting INTs from S and CB, we could really be scary good.  But when we get to 3rd and 15, and then give up an easy 18 yard pass, I just pull out some more hair, and curse, and try not to spill my beer. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 07, 2011, 10:01:44 am
Ha! I know the feeling
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 07, 2011, 10:26:09 am
I think the D really needs some contribution from the secondary.  With the push up front, if we can start getting INTs from S and CB, we could really be scary good.  But when we get to 3rd and 15, and then give up an easy 18 yard pass, I just pull out some more hair, and curse, and try not to spill my beer.

Yup...  in the glory days of the Lovie D back in St. Louis, his defenses were known for making offenses suffer in long-yardage situations and specifically, for getting turnovers. The last few years though, 3rd-and-long has been easy picking for opposing offenses and the big-play capability on the defensive side of the ball has gone largely missing except for an occasional strip here and there.  If the additions of Peppers, Okoye and now Merriwether can bring some of that "fear factor" back to our D, I'm all for it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on September 07, 2011, 10:31:24 am
If the defensive line can dominate, the corner backs and safeties will look like all stars.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on September 07, 2011, 10:32:18 am
Martz runs one of the more difficult offenses in the league and last year was the first in his system.

You would have to think after a year and a second camp there will be significant improvement.

Cutler is not the leader type so I don't expect him to be much of one.

That's where the loss of kreutz hurts the most.  In a critical game with the croud roaring in a visiting stadium, the playoffs on the line and it's third and 9, I want Kreutz in the huddle and making the line calls.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 07, 2011, 10:42:06 am
I think the D is gonna have to carry the O, for the first few games at least. The air game just doesn't look like it's in sync yet, and it's not gonna get any easier as the weather gets colder.  Hopefully Marinelli's boys are up to it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 07, 2011, 10:46:14 am
I think our passing O will look better if Bennett is on the field every play.
I don't really care where you put him just get him on the field.
I might would give Williams a chance in the games but I would let Bennett be my bread and butter guy.
He just gets open and catches the ball.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 07, 2011, 11:11:50 am
Yep, that's about how I see it too.

Hester can catch the ball most of the time but can't always get open due to his small size and inexperience as a WR.

Roy Williams is the exact opposite -- a big target who seems to get open pretty easily but is completely unreliable as far as making the actual catch.

Knox is the X factor. Decent skills and seems willing to work at it, but I'm not ready to count on him in the clutch just yet. It feels like Martz is struggling to find ways to use him most effectively.

Bennett is the most complete package at WR that we can currently put on the field.  He, along with Forte, are the skill players who will really dictate how successful this offense can be, and they both need to be on the field for as many snaps as possible, IMO.  If/when one or both of them are out of the mix I think our O is going to have real matchup problems, at least against the better defenses in the league.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 07, 2011, 11:14:36 am
Yeah third and long is as good as it gets for Aaron Rodgers.  He probably takes a sack on first and second down, just to get that.  LOL
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 07, 2011, 06:18:34 pm

 At least we go up against Atlanta who is going to call us out for who we are.

 Either we win or lose and the adjustments have to be made pronto.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 07, 2011, 07:04:54 pm
This is interesting reading:

But what really matters is catching the ball, and if there’s another comparison between Muhammad and Williams, it’s that Chicago is where loud, self-satisfied receivers go to drop the ball.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/rosenblog/chi-big-mouth-little-production-williams-just-doesnt-get-it-20110825,0,5096962.column
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 07, 2011, 07:15:43 pm
Griz you here the nfl forcasts on the local? Frank Wychek has the Packers winning " a layup".  ****s.

Hey 46 - Didn't hear that, but I switch back and forth between them and 104.5 on my commute.  Whoever is not talking NFL, get's switched!  What is the name of the sidekick with Wychek.  They were talking about beach soccer and they kind of lost me...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 07, 2011, 07:32:46 pm
Ahh-damn, you got me on that one. Should know, but don't.  You sound like me on my commute. Do you know which station if any have Mike and Mike? I wish somehow  I could get some Chicago sports radio, but that ain't gonna happen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 08, 2011, 12:16:57 am
What I'm hoping for is that that whosit probowl AFC safety we got that is known as a hellacious hitter can light up some of the recievers in our Division good...ya know, let em know he's back there? Like, 'Hi! Here's your jockstrap! I'll be back here waiting for the next time you try coming my way. Nice to meet ya!' .....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 08, 2011, 06:45:37 am
Ahh-damn, you got me on that one. Should know, but don't.  You sound like me on my commute. Do you know which station if any have Mike and Mike? I wish somehow  I could get some Chicago sports radio, but that ain't gonna happen.

I know Dan Patrick is on 104.5 at 10am, but I haven't heard Mike and Mike.  And, you will be surprised once the winter is here, I get 670 the Score from Chicago in the Altima as clear as a bell.  It doesn't come in during the summer, but the cooler temps bring it in.  Morning and evening commutes, not so sure how it comes in during the day.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 08, 2011, 07:08:38 am
Check out XM-Sirius - if you are on the road a lot... they have several sports channels
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 08, 2011, 08:06:38 am
What I'm hoping for is that that whosit probowl AFC safety we got that is known as a hellacious hitter can light up some of the recievers in our Division good...ya know, let em know he's back there? Like, 'Hi! Here's your jockstrap! I'll be back here waiting for the next time you try coming my way. Nice to meet ya!' .....

That would be awesome...  but at this point I'd settle for a S that can cover, tackle and stay healthy. We haven't had many of those around these parts lately. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 08, 2011, 08:55:39 am
Holy crap, check out that salary:

The contract the Bears signed Meriweather to makes it very clear they’re planning on using him in a prominent role -- quickly. Meriweather signed a one-year contract on Monday and he received a $1 million signing bonus with a base salary of $2.25 million.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 08, 2011, 09:08:45 am
Let's hope he earns it.  I've a feeling at least one recent pickup won't be.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 08, 2011, 09:11:05 am
You dont pay players that kind of money to sit on the bench or not make plays
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 08, 2011, 09:13:18 am
Hard for me to see why you need to pay a guy almost double what he was making from the team that cut him.

Someone in the Bears organization must have wanted him really bad.

Meanwhile the Forte deal negotiations get put on the shelf.  Whatever. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on September 08, 2011, 09:18:28 am
RuskAnegelo and Smith are feeling the heat... they know that they do not want to follow up last year with a bad one. This has led to some decision making that could backfire. Or not. We'll have to see how it all plays off....

Lets get to watching some FOOOTTTBAAAWWWL !
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 08, 2011, 09:23:48 am
Season begins tonight right? Bears on Sunday. Go Bears
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AZSteve on September 08, 2011, 09:26:49 am
Just curious...posted some time back if there will be a pick 'em forum...is that going to happen?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 08, 2011, 09:27:21 am
Here's how I would rank the "big name" FA acquisitions from this offseason and preseason.

1) Okoye. Hands down our best DL pickup of the year (FA or draft), and a flat-out steal if he can return the caliber of play at the 3-Technique to pre-injury Tommie Harris levels.

2) Merriwether.  Based strictly on potential at this point since he hasn't played a down in a Bears uni. Hopefully he is much more than Adam Archuleta with dreads.

3) Barber. Would be ranked #2 if he hadn't gotten hurt again already.

4) Roy Williams.  Hasn't improved our air game and arguably, has made it worse. If we had one more WR on the roster that was even as good as Earl Bennett, RoyBoy may not have even made the 53.

5) Gholston. A total washout.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 08, 2011, 10:29:51 am
Don't forget the new FB

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-sign-fullback-clutts-to-practice-squad-20110907,0,4739755.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 08, 2011, 10:38:52 am
Don't forget the new FB

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-sign-fullback-clutts-to-practice-squad-20110907,0,4739755.story

Interesting...  so it's not that Martz didn't want a FB...  he just wanted a different one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 08, 2011, 11:35:51 am
I doubt Clutts will be on the roster long. I also dont believe Martz had a thing to do about Tofu or Clutts. I see according to the article he was a college DE which is right up Angelo's wheelhouse. Angelo collects defensive talent, not offensive talent.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 08, 2011, 11:41:59 am
I doubt Clutts will be on the roster long. I also dont believe Martz had a thing to do about Tofu or Clutts. I see according to the article he was a college DE which is right up Angelo's wheelhouse. Angelo collects defensive talent, not offensive talent.

I was thinking the exact same thing.  They are probably going to let Marinelli try him at DE, sheesh.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 08, 2011, 11:50:42 am
I was thinking the exact same thing.  They are probably going to let Marinelli try him at DE, sheesh.

Thats my guess too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 08, 2011, 11:57:01 am
I was thinking the exact same thing.  They are probably going to let Marinelli try him at DE, sheesh.

Yeah,  cause 10 D-Linemen isn't enough already...   ::)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 08, 2011, 01:01:48 pm
Thats why you draft a DT in the 3rd round every year. Never have enough of them
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 08, 2011, 01:38:26 pm
Like Kudzu.  Keep expanding on the roster and no matter what, you can't get rid of them.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BillSharp on September 08, 2011, 04:08:25 pm
Hope Clutts works out, we've had nothing but small FBs for a while. Having a 6'2 260 lb FB is at least a step in the right direction!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 08, 2011, 04:39:00 pm
Hope Clutts works out, we've had nothing but small FBs for a while. Having a 6'2 260 lb FB is at least a step in the right direction!!!

Jason McKie wasn't that small (250-ish as I recall) but he played more like 190.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 08, 2011, 04:52:17 pm
I hope he does too.  You can't help but like a story like that. That's a lotta miles and perserverance.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 08, 2011, 11:47:44 pm

 We been putting this on the backburner for so long it may come to bite us in the a#ss.

 OFFENSIVE LINE has been a throwaway issue ...

 but now GREEN BAY and DEEEETROIT may have come on ....

 do we have the OFFENSIVE LINE to stand up?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 10, 2011, 09:51:50 am
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8220cd83/article/bears-curious-offseason-raises-questions-about-2011-outlook

Wow lots of hate here for the Bears from the "journalists" yet when letting fans vote the game is at even.  Not even a slight edge to the Falcons.

I hope the Bears come out and kick some azz the first few weeks and shut up the haters.  Some of the points Lacanfora (whatever his same is) were making did not even make sense.  He says the Bears failed to sign Kruetz over a few hundred thousand dollars.  Hello he was offered 4 million he wanted 4.5 million, hey genius that is 500,000 difference not a couple hundred difference.  He signed with the Saints for only 2 million.  I am not sure what Kruetz problem was.  I thank him for a lot of good years with the Bears but it was time to move on.

Plus so far he is not missed at all that I can tell.  The running game is way better with out him and the passing blocking is better this time of the year then it was last year.

Briggs is being an idiot who cares that he asked to be traded.  He is not going to hold out and the Bears will not trade him.  So it really is a non-issue.  Forte was offered a very fair contract and he turned it down.  That is Fortes right to gamble that he won't get hurt and can get payed more after thios season.  Don't blame the Bears for his greed.

It seems to me a lot of Bears players think they are better then what they are.  Also I believe Briggs and Forte have the same agent Rosenhaus and he is playing the PR game while trying to get his players over paid.





Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 10, 2011, 10:34:34 am
I thought this guy got cut and I really didnt like his safety play but apparently he is going to be a ST ace. His name is Winston Venable #49

‘‘But there are going to be [mistakes(on ST)]. We just didn’t spend enough time with these guys to help develop them during the [offseason practices that were canceled by the lockout] — that makes a big difference.’’

With his reckless abandon, the 5-11, 210-pound Venable is a prime candidate to emerge as an impact special-teams player. He already has the mentality for it — he just likes to hit anything that moves. Venable won the ‘‘Hammer Award’’ at Boise State. In 2009, he destroyed an Idaho kicker on a teammate’s 100-yard kickoff return. Last year, he was suspended for a half-game by the WAC for a helmet-to-helmet hit on Oregon State’s James Rodgers, who was blocking on a quarterback scramble. Rodgers suffered a concussion.

And if you have the ball, he’s just as dangerous. In the Bears’ preseason game Sept. 1 against the Cleveland Browns, Venable was penalized for unnecessary roughness for a helmet-to-helmet hit on wide receiver Demetrius Williams. Venable was fined $20,000 by the NFL for the hit — he hopes to have it reduced upon appeal (the NFL rookie salary is $357,000). But for Venable, it’s a price worth paying.

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/7566708-606/rookie-safety-winston-venable-a-perfect-fit-on-bears-special-teams.html

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 10, 2011, 01:32:46 pm
Make no mistake, this is gonna be one helluva tough game for the Bears to win. Falcons have some potent weapons and a very good QB. The plus for the Bears is it's on their turf....I still have a hard time seeing the Bears win this one....hope I'm wrong....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 10, 2011, 01:54:20 pm
That was not a helmet to helmet hit.  It was a clean hit.  The flag and fine was for hitting a "defenseless player" which used to be called "playing football".
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 10, 2011, 02:29:19 pm
Thing about this Lovie led team is lack of any consistency. They'll go 13-3 and end up in the Super Bowl one year, and the next totally flop, then the NEXT go 11-5 and in the NFC Championship game and then.....it's UP and down, UP and down....so since last season was UP...what's THIS one gonna be?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 10, 2011, 02:57:12 pm
The Lovie Smith era:

2004 5-11
2005 11-6
2006 14-4
2007 7-9
2008 9-7
2009 7-9
2010 12-6
2011 ?-?

Are they going to build on last year like they did from 2005 to 2006?  Or are they going to take a nose dive?

My guess is as long as they do not suffer key injuries it will be a very good season.  It seems the Bears always do well the years the experts say they will stink and then stink the years the experts say they will be good.  Well almost all the experts think the Bears will stinnk this year.  To me this team looks superior to last years team.  I guess we will get a better idea after tomorrow's game how this season may go.  But win or loss one game does not make the season. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 10, 2011, 03:20:45 pm
I guess we will get a better idea after tomorrow's game how this season may go.  But win or loss one game does not make the season.

Thats my feeling too, but then again last year it was the OLine and it improved and the record got better. Just hard to get a handle on the season by one game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 10, 2011, 03:31:42 pm
Talking the talk.  Let's hope he walks the walk.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/chi/report#notes_quotes

Scroll to the bottom for the Roy boy quote please.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 10, 2011, 10:14:39 pm
EXPERTS?

You and I have just as much chance of predicting NFL games - injuries... and depth... Bears are a good team
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 11, 2011, 06:57:02 am
I think the Bears are a "good team". The serious question is are they an elite team? Are they at the same level as the Pack, Aints, Pats and Iggles? INOW they may be good but not good enough.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 11, 2011, 07:51:05 am
Ya gotta look at what they bring to the table. The Oline isn't a strength and should be. The recieving corp is weak to below average. The Secondary is about that,too. Maybe Merriweather can help change that I hope and pray. The LB corp is a definate strength. The Dline is above average. The QB is above average. The running game is average but with Barber added should improve. Now you compare that to the Pack, they're better at almost every position except LB and RB. We desperately needed help on the Oline and reciever and both areas got little true attention. Roy is NOT the answer, we all know this. And Carimi is one pick that should have been more. Sanzen should help but it's not a definate upgrade. Both areas needed much more than they got. If I see the Bears improved, it's a slight improvement where it COULD have been alot better....and really,should have....no excuses ANGIE.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 11, 2011, 09:52:20 am
I wouldn't call the Pack an ELITE team - weren't they the 6th seed in the playoffs last year?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 11, 2011, 11:17:09 am
May have been the 6th seed, but they were the SB champs..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 11, 2011, 11:53:38 am
I wouldn't call the Pack an ELITE team - weren't they the 6th seed in the playoffs last year?

They looked elite Thursday night to me. With Peyton Manning out of the mix Aaron Rogers is clearly the best QB in the NFL... if he wasn't last year already.

And, they pummelled a Falcons team in the playoffs last year that is likely to give us as much as we can handle today.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 11, 2011, 03:31:01 pm
Looking for a good crow recipe.

I am glad Angelo doesn't suck worse, or we would be in a world of hurt.  Just sayin'...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 11, 2011, 03:40:09 pm
Grizz,one game a season does not make. The Dline showed up today. Cutler showed up. Both as I said are above average. The LB, same as I said, a definate strength and that showed today. Forte had good success with the pass game. Running was average as I said also. This was a solid win. No I'm not back tracking at all on what I said. Maybe the Bears take a step forward this season from where they've been. I hope so. And please don't even start with Angelow......good night...his drafts have been horrendous. The FA acquisitions have been solid though. That's kept him with the Bears, really. Mark Anderson had a good season with the Bears too but he's no longer on the team. I'm hoping Reed is a keeper for more than a season. Hope he performs the rest of the way. But again, one game isn't a season.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 11, 2011, 03:46:10 pm
Reed has been making those plays every game in the pre-season.  I was worried he would dissapear once the games started counting and he was facing a better O-line.  He just makes plays.  I would like to see more of him on obvious passing downs.  He is a bit undersized so he could be a liability against the run.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 11, 2011, 03:47:19 pm
Every team in our division has won excpet the Vikings who are still playing.  It is a long season but it was a great way to start it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 11, 2011, 03:48:48 pm
I'm glad for the win. I hope we get to see 15 more this year
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 11, 2011, 07:07:56 pm
Yep, good game. Barring injury, I think we'll be fine..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 11, 2011, 07:12:37 pm
Sporty - That post wasn't directed at you but every detractor on this board that rails on the team's deficiencies.  Our receivers are average at best.  Our QB is middle of the pack.  The defense is aging.  But I give a lot of credit to the talent assembled and the coaching that coaches it.  Not an all star at ever position like the Eagles, but a TEAM.  One game does not a season make.

But, one game following a season where we ended up at the NFC championship and are getting absolutely no respect does. 

What does Angelo and Smith have to do to get respect?  The Lions are picked over the Bears.  So be it.  The Bears just beat the team with the best record in the NFC from last year.  Not a fluke.  Soundly - beat -  them.  There will be posters that will pick this win apart, just watch.  Cutler missed Davis for the easy TD.  Worse, Cutler threw an interception for a TD.  We were lucky to escape with the win.  Thank God the game is only 60 minutes and not 120, we surely would have been drilled and exposed.

Regarding the drafts, the same thing is being said in New England.  Go look at their message boards.  They are hammering Bellichick for his drafts, all those picks and nothing to show for it.  Brady hasn't won a Superbowl in 7 years - it isn't easy. 

I am just saying that we crush our team with criticism, the media doesn't even rate them a playoff team.  And at the end of the year, IF we are in the playoffs - we will be disrespected again saying "they had no injuries" or "they got all of the bounces" or "Cutler is not a leader, look at his body language".  When is it good enough?  I am tired of reading it.  Angelo and Smith deserve better...

Rant over brothers, GO BEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 11, 2011, 07:29:45 pm
Preach on brother!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 11, 2011, 09:32:00 pm
I think its a WIP. Even Lovie said they had things they need to work on.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 11, 2011, 09:40:02 pm
Of course they have things to work on.  It is the first game of the season and there was no off season.  The entire team should improve as the season goes on.

If I have one big concern it is that the Falcons did not really blitz much that I noticed.  They were getting enough pressure with their front four because they have a very good D-line.  How will this O-line fare against the blitzes the Saints will be bringing?

The Saints were getting to Rodgers with blitzes then stopped blitzing after getting burned a few times.  I am not sure if this O-line can handle blitzes or if Cutler will make good quick decisions to make them back off the blitz.  I guess we find out next week!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 12, 2011, 06:22:21 am
It'll be a tough game in their dome.  If we pull out the win, you are looking at the top 2 seeds in the NFC playing in week 3.

The Saints will be a tough game, I'd love to see another defensive performance like we had yesterday.  Pierre Thomas always gives us a tough game, and now they also have his clone in Ingram.  And I am not so sure making the Saints one dimensional is a good thing with Brees back there.  But if that same defensive line shows up next Sunday, we will be a force to be reckoned with.

The NFC North just beat the top 3 teams in the NFC South.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 12, 2011, 07:35:30 am
Yep, I don't see the Saint's as an easy one either.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on September 12, 2011, 07:59:11 am
Saints have a much better OL
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 12, 2011, 08:03:35 am
how about their D? That is what I am worried about.
Our D when healthy can hold their own against most any O.

I noticed Tillman defended the slant pretty well yesterday and broke up a few of those. That is what usually beats us. I didn't think to see if our DB's were playing the WR closer than they have in the past.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 12, 2011, 08:29:40 am
Of course they have things to work on.  It is the first game of the season and there was no off season.  The entire team should improve as the season goes on.

If I have one big concern it is that the Falcons did not really blitz much that I noticed.  They were getting enough pressure with their front four because they have a very good D-line.  How will this O-line fare against the blitzes the Saints will be bringing?

The Saints were getting to Rodgers with blitzes then stopped blitzing after getting burned a few times.  I am not sure if this O-line can handle blitzes or if Cutler will make good quick decisions to make them back off the blitz.  I guess we find out next week!

Exactly. It was the first game of the season. And we would hope they improve as the season goes on.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 12, 2011, 08:52:15 am
I would trade a loss to the Saints next week for a win over the Pack the following.  Although starting out 3-0 would just kill my voice.  After all the screaming yesterday I can hardly talk.  ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 12, 2011, 09:46:15 am
I'd like to beat the Saints next week and keep our momentum up for the Pack.
The Pack played almost flawless against a pretty good NO team.
Maybe we can learn some things from that film.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 12, 2011, 09:48:49 am
just wonder how good our DL will be when we get Wooton back. He was coming along quite nicely.
Melton and Okoye did good yesterday.
I wonder if we would rotate 4 ends and keep them fresher.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 12, 2011, 11:03:33 am
If I have one big concern it is that the Falcons did not really blitz much that I noticed.  They were getting enough pressure with their front four because they have a very good D-line.  How will this O-line fare against the blitzes the Saints will be bringing?

Related to that... the Falcons play a 4-3 front with DBs who don't play real tight and physical.  That's the type of D the Martz system is designed to beat.  The real acid test for how much our offense has really improved will be when we face the 3-4 D with big physical CBs that gave us fits last season.  That's the way NFL defenses are trending so if we can do well against that set-up then we can really acknowledge some significant improvement by Martz & Co.  Until then, I think cautious optimism is warranted.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 12, 2011, 01:48:14 pm
I certainly am in favor of cautious optimism too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 12, 2011, 04:36:29 pm
If Forte keeps putting up games like he did yesterday I have to think it's gonna force Angelo's hand to get a contract extension done sooner than later. 160 yards of total offense is a hell of a lot to lose.

It almost feels like there's a game of chicken going on right now...  Forte and his agent gambling he's gonna have an All-Pro season, while Angelo is holding off in the hopes Forte gets hurt and can be cut (and replaced with someone cheaper) or if he is extended, at a much cheaper rate.

It will be very interesting to see how this plays out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 12, 2011, 04:52:51 pm
The Bears already offered him a very fair contract and Forte turned it down.  Forte wants to be payed like a top 3 RB.  Why would the Bears agree to that?

They can pay him 400,000 this year then put the franchise tag on him next year.  If he wants his rookie contract torn up a year early he has to give a little on his end.  I do hope they find a middle ground and get it done but lets not blame this all on the Bears front office.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 12, 2011, 04:56:32 pm
The Bears already offered him a very fair contract and Forte turned it down.  Forte wants to be payed like a top 3 RB.  Why would the Bears agree to that?

They can pay him 400,000 this year then put the franchise tag on him next year.  If he wants his rookie contract torn up a year early he has to give a little on his end.  I do hope they find a middle ground and get it done but lets not blame this all on the Bears front office.

I'm not blaming either side, really. It's just interesting to see how much both sides are willing to gam-ble to "win" on this because right now the stakes are pretty high on either side of the table. 

Obviously Forte's agent wanted to wait and see what CJ and AP got paid (even though Forte is clearly not in that caliber), but now having turned down the initial Bears offer Forte has a lot more to lose should he happen to get hurt.

OTOH, in Forte's defense, you look at his rookie contract and you can't deny the Bears have been getting the steal of the century at RB. When you look at the millions and millions of dollars Angelo has paid out to stiffs like Pace, Omiyale, Archuleta, Chris Williams, and even the last ill-advised extensions to Tommie Harris and Olin Kreutz, I can completely understand why Forte is just a bit peeved. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 12, 2011, 05:44:56 pm
I'm not blaming either side, really. It's just interesting to see how much both sides are willing to gam-ble to "win" on this because right now the stakes are pretty high on either side of the table. 

Obviously Forte's agent wanted to wait and see what CJ and AP got paid (even though Forte is clearly not in that caliber), but now having turned down the initial Bears offer Forte has a lot more to lose should he happen to get hurt.

OTOH, in Forte's defense, you look at his rookie contract and you can't deny the Bears have been getting the steal of the century at RB. When you look at the millions and millions of dollars Angelo has paid out to stiffs like Pace, Omiyale, Archuleta, Chris Williams, and even the last ill-advised extensions to Tommie Harris and Olin Kreutz, I can completely understand why Forte is just a bit peeved.

 You forgot the $2'000'000.00 paid to the QB for one year no longer on this team.

 Whos name escapes me at the moment.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on September 12, 2011, 06:11:07 pm
Claude Fallins...no

Blob Bawlins.....Hmmmmm, that's not it....Any help?

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on September 12, 2011, 10:09:44 pm
Claude Fallins...no

Blob Bawlins.....Hmmmmm, that's not it....Any help?

Fraud Rollins?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on September 12, 2011, 10:58:04 pm
If we can't handle the Saints, it wouldn't look very good for us against the Packers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 12, 2011, 11:03:25 pm
I suspect both will be close competitive games.  If we split the next two I will be very happy.  If we win both I will be thrilled!

I think our defense will play well against both but those offenses will get their yards and will score a few times.  It really comes down to the Bears offense being able to score more then 17 points against those defenses.



Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on September 12, 2011, 11:45:15 pm
Neither of them have great defenses.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on September 13, 2011, 04:52:21 am
Plod Maulins?  Nawwwwww....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 13, 2011, 06:48:46 am
Steelers lose Willie Colon to a torn triceps muscle.  Wasn't that the guy we tried to sign in the offseason?  Sometimes the best signing are the ones you never make, thank you Antwan Randle-El for Devin Hester and Willie Colon for ??? - pay Matt Forte.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 13, 2011, 08:17:47 am
Yup, thats the guy that turned us down to return to the Steelers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 13, 2011, 08:40:38 am
Yeah but who says Wille Colon would have torn his triceps if we had signed him? 

Anyway... Lots of key players went down with season ending injuries this last weekend.  Glad we avoided that.

One of the biggest things that contributed to the Falcons win was that our D got turnovers. If we can steal the ball 2 or 3 times against both the Saints and the Packers our odds of winning go up a great deal, assuming our offense doesn't regress.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 13, 2011, 08:48:46 am
Yep - because Matty Ice had some good numbers if you take away the turnovers
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 13, 2011, 08:55:57 am
I know that name! uh,uh, Rod Tollins! No, wait,wait.....that was the "star" in one of the uh, early 70's "art films"  from the Beta max. Never mind.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 13, 2011, 09:34:02 am
you guys mean Cod Tollins.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 13, 2011, 09:42:18 am
You guys mean Henry Rollins?

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=rollins+band+music+video+liar&mid=37437E212E3F27C7914137437E212E3F27C79141&view=detail&FORM=VIRE1
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on September 13, 2011, 10:17:34 am
One of the best music videos ever...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 13, 2011, 11:59:03 am
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/Man-charged-with-****-at-home-of-Chicago-Bears-safety-Brandon-Meriweather-091311

Well now we know why Meriweather was let go in New England...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 13, 2011, 12:03:23 pm
This is a very different situation though than, say, the Tank Johnson thing. The incident allegedly happened in Merriwether's house, but it has already been established he was nowhere around. 

It definitely raises questions about the type of company he keeps ...  but you could raise the same question about half the players in the NFL these days (and about 90% of the NFL players hailing from Merriwether's particular alma mater).

This incident actually doesn't concern me that much as I see no way any of this sticks to him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 13, 2011, 12:09:20 pm
Oh I agree.  But I am pretty sure this is why New England dropped him.  They probably gave him a warning after the gun incident (which by the way he owned the gun legally and he was cleared of all charges) and this was the final straw.

I hope he has a great year for the Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 13, 2011, 12:23:55 pm
Oh I agree.  But I am pretty sure this is why New England dropped him.  They probably gave him a warning after the gun incident (which by the way he owned the gun legally and he was cleared of all charges) and this was the final straw. 

Agreed. New England sets the bar higher than any other team in the league when it comes to conduct off the field. If you're playing for Belichick and there's even a hint of shady business in your personal life, you're outta there and he doesn't care how many Pro Bowls you've gone to. 

I'm actually amazed Randy Moss was able to last there as long as he did.  And I'm curious to see if Haynesworth makes it to the bye week, much less the full season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 13, 2011, 01:40:00 pm

Looking at the Saints game this weekend Bears catch a huge break with Colston out due the shoulder injury.  Plus DE Will Smith is still serving that 2 game suspension.

Still looks like it could turn into a track meet.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 13, 2011, 01:43:06 pm
Colston being out is huge.

It will also be a relief not to have to worry about Reggie Bush anymore. But Pierre Thomas and Mark Ingram are a solid 1-2 RB tandem that have the potential to wear down our D if they're out there for too many snaps.

I hope it doesn't turn into a track meet but if it does I'm more confident we can keep up this year than I was in years past.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 13, 2011, 01:46:35 pm
Darren Sproles is a huge upgrade over Reggie Bush.  I am concerned about Sproles.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 13, 2011, 01:51:07 pm
Re the Saints DL, as well as Will Smith being out, they lost Anthony Hargrove to FA. So that's two pretty effective players missing. It would be nice if J'Marcus Webb can draw a little lower-caliber opponent this Sunday so he can really start getting his feet under him at LT and build up some confidence.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 13, 2011, 02:21:33 pm
Pierre Thomas usually gives us a trouble and Ingram is no slouch, but I can't recall very many recent games where the opponent's run game contributed significantly to a Bears loss. 

The Saints will probably start Meecham and Devery Henderson, both decent receivers.  But they might be decent because defenses in the past focused on Colston.

The guy we need to watch out for though, is Darren Sproles.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 13, 2011, 02:37:36 pm
Merriwether knocking Sproles out of the game early would justify his pick-up in and of itself.

I would even trade a 15-yarder for that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 13, 2011, 03:01:55 pm
Sproles will kill us unless we have a stopper
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 13, 2011, 03:11:00 pm
Hopefully our DTs can abuse Kreutz, which should pay dividends against both the run and the pass.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 13, 2011, 03:14:02 pm
Mmmmmmm- He'll know the D line calls. It could get ugly from that standpoint.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 13, 2011, 04:02:38 pm
Mmmmmmm- He'll know the D line calls. It could get ugly from that standpoint.

I wouldn't doubt but that Marinelli has changed-up the terminology for the DL calls... if only for this game.  And/or possibly has installed some new wrinkles since Kreutz departed.

But even if Kreutz knows the calls, he and his linemates still have to be able to block them, which based on the Packers game was a real problem for them.

I appreciate all Kreutz gave to this team but I hope our young DTs just vaporize him on Sunday.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 13, 2011, 05:12:04 pm

 Hmmmm ... I think I am going to have a mixed drink called a TOM COLLINS ...

 while wondering where to get the money to pay FORTE ...  ???

 


 The earliest recipes for the Tom Collins include the following:


•Juice of half a lemon and half a lime
•One ounce (about .02 liters) of gin
•Powdered sugar
•Oil of orange

The drink is mixed together, topped off with soda water, and served in a tall glass, usually with a couple of cubes of ice. Garnishes can include orange slices, cherries, or pineapples. The advent of a Collins mixer often means people shortcut juicing limes and lemons and instead simply combine gin and Collins mixer together. However, those who enjoy the drink tend to prefer the more naturally derived and original form.

 ENJOY !! He's not on the TEAM anymore.  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on September 13, 2011, 05:25:39 pm
Sproles had slowed down quite a bit last year, which is why the Chargers let him go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 13, 2011, 05:39:52 pm
Apparently you did not watch the Saints/Packers game.  The dude was making plays every where.

The Saints picked him up as the replacement for Bush and he has filled them shoes very well.  He returns punts/kicks, lines up in the backfield and as a WR.  The Saints know how to use the guys skills and he is making the most of it.  Well at least against the Packers he did.  Hopefully the Bears shut him down.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 13, 2011, 05:49:33 pm

 After WEEK ONE ...

 DEFENSE RANK :

 CHICAGO BEARS 22

 NEW ORLEANS SAINTS 25

 BTW ... Seattle is #2

 15 more games to go ...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on September 13, 2011, 05:50:45 pm
I have always admired Spoles' talent.  He really hurt GB thursday.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 13, 2011, 06:21:06 pm

 OK so some words are underlinded with DOTS .... which when you click on to that word are advertisements.

 Nothing wrong with that ... gotta keep the board moving.

 The more the merrier!  :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 13, 2011, 06:26:23 pm

 Like to see these words underlined with DOTS :

 GOD

 LOVE

 COCCCKSUCKINGMOTHERFUUUUCKINGSONOFABIITCH
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 14, 2011, 04:35:03 am
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chi-urlacher-leaves-to-attend-to-mother-20110913,0,2064886.story

Hope all is OK. Hate to see a distraction..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 14, 2011, 04:37:26 am
Damn, we're a 7 point dog?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 14, 2011, 05:20:18 am
If you count the 3 point automatic home field advantage, we were 6.5 point dogs against the Falcons.  Losing Urlacher for the game would be huge.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 08:25:11 am
That line may go up a few more points if we're gonna be minus #54 on Sunday.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 14, 2011, 08:28:25 am
I expect unless it looks like she is gonna die that day that he'll be there come game time.
I think she lives on the Tx/La border so it might not be that far from where she is.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 08:45:09 am
I expect unless it looks like she is gonna die that day that he'll be there come game time.
I think she lives on the Tx/La border so it might not be that far from where she is.

Good point.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on September 14, 2011, 08:59:11 am
Bears are the only team not to give a defensive TD this weekend..... :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 14, 2011, 09:03:01 am
Article said he was headed to AZ - is she in a hospital out there or something?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 09:07:17 am
I suspect unless his Mom actually passes away we'll know very little about what's actually going on.

As we've seen previously with guys like Peanut and Unga, the Bears are extremely protective of their players personal lives -- especially when it comes to family matters -- and they traditionally release little to no information on that kind of thing.  The Bears are required by league rules (I believe) to disclose if Urlacher will not be playing on Sunday, but that's about all they're required to disclose and I doubt we'll know much more than that at least until the situation resolves one way or another.

It just sucks this had to happen to Brian now after coming off his best game in years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 09:09:08 am
Bears are the only team not to give a defensive TD this weekend..... :D

Yeah and that's what makes that #22 ranking of our D kind of misleading.  We gave up a ton of yards, but they didn't translate to points. 

I don't think anyone who watched the Falcons game would say we only have the 22nd best D in the league.  And I'm pretty sure the Seahawks would have gladly dropped down a few notches in the D rankings in exchange for the win.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 14, 2011, 09:16:39 am
It was great to see him playing at such a high level against the Falcons. If he were to play with his mind elsewhere that wouldnt be good either. Lets see how it plays out once more details come out. We definitely need Urlacker mentally strong come Sunday
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 09:18:31 am
Yeah, I'm not sure when they announce NFC Players of the Week but Urlacher has to be in strong contention for that honor on the defensive side.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 14, 2011, 09:21:37 am
Well, if urlacher is out it would be the perfect time for Briggs to prove that he's worth the money he's demanding. Can Lance take over a game? We'll see.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 09:43:38 am
Well, if urlacher is out it would be the perfect time for Briggs to prove that he's worth the money he's demanding. Can Lance take over a game? We'll see.

It would also make us look pretty silly for only carrying 5 LBs on the roster.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 09:57:18 am
Gotta love this guy...

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/7645690-606/bears-spotlight-tyler-clutts-in-right-place-at-right-time.html

Supposedly he was in the hotel weight room the morning of the game on Sunday, working out. And it's already clear from last Sunday he is 10 times the football player of anyone else we've had at FB for years.

We've had a lot of wine-and-cheese guys on our offense the last few years...  Clutts brings back some of the old-school vibe we've desparately missed and I love it. He's one of those guys that's never gonna make millions but does all the dirty work that makes the whole offense better and pushes everyone around him to match his intensity, just by example. Hope he can stay healthy and have a long, productive career with us.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 14, 2011, 10:09:40 am
But the poor guys name....Clutts....sheesh........hope he isn't asked to catch any balls,lol...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 14, 2011, 10:26:19 am
at least Harris isn't complaining about his pay

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0914-chris-harris--bears-chicago--20110914,0,4323733.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 10:45:32 am
But the poor guys name....Clutts....sheesh........hope he isn't asked to catch any balls,lol...

I'll take a player with his name any day over 250-lbs-of-worthless Jason McKie or 300-lbs-of-wasted-oxygen Manamaleuna.

Plus, you gotta figure a guy gets pretty tough after living 26 years with a name like that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 14, 2011, 10:47:49 am
Glad you added the 'tough, Yapp, LOL!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 11:18:00 am
Take this for what it's worth, but here's a comment someone posted to the Tribune article about Urlacher's situation.  Timestamped 10:47 AM Central Time today.

So sorry for Brian and his family in this time of a great loss in the death of his mother she was a great person and true friend to all that meet her our hearts and prays go out to the family in this time of a great loss Lovington sends you big hug and lots of love for you and your family she will be missed greatly

The Tribune article is not reporting a death and has not been updated since 12:50 this morning, so there's no way of knowing whether this comment is legit or just sick speculation by a troll...  but if Urlacher's mom has indeed passed I would expect he will not be making the game this Sunday.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 14, 2011, 11:51:27 am

I read something elsewhere that stated she passed away yesterday...from another fan...unsubstantiated. 

IF she did pass away (and that's a big IF) funeral could be on Saturday.   It would be a personal decision if Urlacher felt like he wanted to play Sunday.  I'm sure he could walk on the field minutes before game time with minimal preparation and be fine.  Again it would be up to him.

Otherwise rookie DiCiccio starts.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 12:20:05 pm
I read something elsewhere that stated she passed away yesterday...from another fan...unsubstantiated. 

IF she did pass away (and that's a big IF) funeral could be on Saturday.   It would be a personal decision if Urlacher felt like he wanted to play Sunday.  I'm sure he could walk on the field minutes before game time with minimal preparation and be fine.  Again it would be up to him.

I'm thinking back to when Brett Favre's dad died and he came out the next game and had one of the best games of his career.  If Urlacher is of that mentality...  and if he were to play just a day after laying his mom to rest...  he could be a holy terror on Sunday.

I hate to get too far ahead of things not knowing what's actually going on, but I think it's highly unlikely they would expedite a funeral just so he could play on Sunday.  I also believe Urlacher realizes the importance of this game which means that if he feels he would be a liability out there he'll opt out and we as fans need to respect that.

The bigger issue is that if there is a funeral this weekend that will impact not just Urlacher but other Bears teammates and coaches who presumably would join him for that.  So not only may Urlacher be out of the mix for the game, but prep time for the entire defensive unit could be reduced, which is really not what you want when going up against Brees and that offense.
 
That all being said, Lovie is a players coach first and foremost, and if doing right by #54 means we lose to the Saints, he's 100% OK with that and Bears fans will have to be, too.  I know a lot of people (myself included) frequently dog Lovie about his apparent lack of interest in winning but in this case priorities should be pretty clear.   

And if somehow the Bears could pull off a win in New Orleans without Urlacher (which I give about a 1-in-5 chance of happening), that would set a tremendously positive tone for this team at this point in the season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 12:46:07 pm
FWIW the Tribune updated the story about an hour ago, but all they did was add a paragraph about Urlacher winning NFC D Player of the Week.  No new information about his mom although the last paragraph about her is written in past tense if that means anything.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chi-urlacher-leaves-to-attend-to-mother-20110913,0,2064886.story

It may very well be that she has passed but the papers are withholding that information until all the family members can be notified.  And/or they are under a gag order from Halas Hall.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 14, 2011, 01:05:55 pm
from being active in my church and on the cemetery committee, it seems like they usually like to wrap these things up in 3-4 days. In some rare circumstances (lots of families out of town, autopsies etc)  they might go 5-7 but most are complete in about 4 days.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 01:13:24 pm
At the risk of being cynical... if I'm Lovie Smith then I want to keep Urlacher's status for Sunday a secret as long as possible.

Make the Saints OC draw up not one gameplan, but two. One with 54 and one without.

The league is extremely strict about making teams declare their players' availability in the case of injuries...  but whether the same rules apply for non-medical matters I'm not sure. 

I would suspect there are a lot of fantasy junkies (and bookies) who are following this story with extreme interest. If Urlacher's out then the Saints offense could have a monster day.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 14, 2011, 01:19:37 pm

the rumors are true...she's passed:  http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2011/09/brian_urlachers_mother_unexpec.html
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 01:29:13 pm
Wow...  prayers out to Url.

If she passed on Monday that probably means a Friday funeral unless there are extenuating circumstances.

Lovie's week just got a lot more challenging...  supporting Brian while also keeping the rest of the team focused on a tough road game.

I really wish now that we were playing an AFC team this week... 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 01:36:33 pm
Tribune story that just broke:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-urlacher-mourns-passing-of-mother-20110914,0,3889143.story

51 years old...  Wow.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 14, 2011, 02:00:52 pm
It sure seems like the off-field distractions are coming fast and furious for the Bears already this season.

Unga, Url's mom, the Merriweather thing, Briggs and Forte contracts, etc. I hope this isn't one of those seasons where it's just going to be one crisis after another cause this year's Bears team appears to have more talent than they've had in quite awhile and I'd hate to see off-field stuff keep them from getting as far as they can go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 14, 2011, 07:11:58 pm
That's too bad. Brian needs to take care of family business. If it means a loss, so be it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 14, 2011, 07:23:58 pm
On ABC 7 sports they said if Urlacker doesnt play Briggs moves into the middle and Iwuh replaces Briggs, with De Chicco subbing for Briggs if he needs a break.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 15, 2011, 04:32:40 am
If that's the case, there's Briggs chance to shine..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 15, 2011, 08:03:18 am
Just read on the tribune that Roach will man the middle with Iwuh playing SLB.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 15, 2011, 08:14:21 am
We're DOA if Url doesn't play....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 15, 2011, 08:30:06 am
Just read on the tribune that Roach will man the middle with Iwuh playing SLB.

Maybe thats what they said. Sorry. I must not have heard it right.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 08:37:31 am
Remember how awful our D was that year Urlacher was out with the injury?  Look out. Brees will throw crossing routes and slants over the middle on us all day.

We're gonna need 30 points to even be in the game. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 15, 2011, 09:27:05 am
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Urlacher-leaves-Bears-to-be-with-family-after-mo?urn=nfl-wp7110

I don't know how accurate this is but it claims that Urlacher is expected to play
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 09:34:41 am
I do know this much...  whether Urlacher's next game is Sunday vs. the Saints or next week against the Pack, I expect him to have a career day.  And the rest of the Bears D as well.

In that respect, maybe 54 should just chill until we play the Pack...    ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 15, 2011, 09:57:15 am
I believe Urlacker will play Sunday againt the Aints.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 15, 2011, 10:07:04 am

I've been in Urlacher's situation myself (losing a parent, not playing in the NFL).  The fact that she died earlier in the week I would think that you can mourn only so much.  Now I know everyone is different and in Urlacher's situation the parent didn't appear to be in poor health and the death was unexpected - which makes it harder to deal with.

But there is no way I see Urlacher continue to mourn knowing his teammates are out there playing football.  I'd think playing football would be therapeutic for his own well being.

But if he decides to sit out this weekend's game, no one should question his decision.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 15, 2011, 10:32:48 am
Crazy they called it "Natural causes" and she was only 51... Is a stroke considered natural?

Neighbor had a serious stroke when she was about 45 - apparently somewhat common for women in that age group
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 15, 2011, 11:09:46 am
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-urlacher-back-with-bears-after-death-of-mother-20110915,0,6327425.story

Deepest condolences to the family. 51 is too young. Raising 3 and working 3 jobs at once takes its toll.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 11:12:32 am
If you read up on his mom's life, it was a pretty tough one.  She was married with three kids before she got out of her teens, got divorced at 25 and at one point was working 3 jobs to raise her family as a single mom (admirable to say the least, but also extremely hard on a person's physical and emotional well-being). It could be that all of that wound up taking its toll.

That all being said, it could very well be that Urlacher is ready to play by Sunday as a form of release. I play in a band on weekends and it so happened my mom passed away on a day we had a gig...  she passed in the morning and the gig was that night and I went ahead and played it because #1 I had committed to it and #2 I needed it.  So if logistics allow him to play I could very easily see him doing it.  And I could see him playing very well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 15, 2011, 11:23:30 am
My Mom worked 3 jobs when I was growing up - Doesn't everyone?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 15, 2011, 11:24:22 am
The Score is reporting Urlacher's at Halas today. Guess the funeral is Saturday. I'm betting he's gonna play but def understand if he doesn't.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 15, 2011, 11:24:57 am
I also remember wanting to get back to a normal routine after a death in the family
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 15, 2011, 11:27:08 am
A guy at work this year lost his wife and was back to work the next week acting totally normal.....not sure I could do that.....it was a totally sudden unexpected death. A expected one is a different animal,you're somewhat prepared for...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on September 15, 2011, 11:38:02 am
Crazy they called it "Natural causes" and she was only 51... Is a stroke considered natural?

Neighbor had a serious stroke when she was about 45 - apparently somewhat common for women in that age group

Anything that isn't suicide, murder or accidental is considered "natural cause"
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 11:46:13 am
I'm sure Urlacher has been communicating closely with Halas Hall and the coaches throughout the past few days and that they have been working together to minimize disruption to this week's game preps as much as possible. There's only so much you can do ahead of a funeral and then you let others take over. Urlacher has probably gotten to that point and so he's back for final game preps with the team today and will fly down to New Orleans with the team whenever they leave. 

Given the relative proximity between New Orleans and where the funeral will be held, the Bears are probably just factoring that into their itinerary, and I would expect the players will be given Saturday off so that as many as want to can be at the funeral with Brian. It would surprise me a great deal if a large contingent of Bears (former and current) were not in attendance at that funeral and especially the D. The team may even charter some sort of shuttle for that to simplify logistics.   

Seems like the least the team could do, especially for its defensive captain.

As for impact on the game, I'm hoping that emotion and motivation can outweigh whatever practice time has been lost.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 15, 2011, 12:29:22 pm
A replay of the Walter Payton game would be nice
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 12:31:46 pm
I wonder if Olin Kreutz shows up at the funeral?

That wouldn't be awkward...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 15, 2011, 12:40:37 pm
Why would it be awkward?  I think these guys can seperate on the field and off.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 15, 2011, 12:44:01 pm
yeah, if someone I worked with every day for 10 years had their mother pass away I think it would be a good thing for them to show up at the funeral even if we worked for competitors now.

That being said, NO might not let Kreutz off to go given the circumstances.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 12:45:40 pm
Why would it be awkward?  I think these guys can seperate on the field and off.

Under normal circumstances it wouldn't be so awkward...  it's just the fact we're playing the Saints this very weekend, is all. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 12:46:55 pm
That being said, NO might not let Kreutz off to go given the circumstances.

I was wondering about that too.  I bet that unless they prohibit Kreutz from going, he'll be there.  Heck even if they say no he may still go   ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 15, 2011, 12:51:15 pm
I wouldn't attend the funeral unless I personally knew the deceased - funerals generally SUCK!

Those processions they have in New Orleans are pretty cool though
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 12:57:04 pm
Yes they are, but the funeral won't be in New Orleans.

Lost in all of this is a matchup I'm really interested to see...  our young, smallish DTs against the two mammoth veteran OGs of the Saints.

Jahri Evans is 6'4 318, a 6-year vet who is one of the best in the game. Opposite him is Carl Nicks, a beast of a man at 6'5, 343 that more than a few teams had on their FA wish list.  This will be a whole nother tier of players that our DTs are facing compared to the OGs on the Falcons. If our DTs' quickness can't counter their size and strength it could be a long hard day. 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 15, 2011, 01:10:09 pm

Not sure where the funeral will be.  If it is in Mt. Pleasant that's 2 hours east of Dallas and around 7 or 8 hour drive to New Orleans.  I don't think they will be renting a bus to shuttle players to the game from there.

Maybe the funerral is back in New Mexico - I hadn't heard where it was going to be.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 01:16:18 pm
Not sure where the funeral will be.  If it is in Mt. Pleasant that's 2 hours east of Dallas and around 7 or 8 hour drive to New Orleans.  I don't think they will be renting a bus to shuttle players to the game from there.

I was thinking they could charter a plane for the players. It would be expensive, but if there's one Bear the McCaskeys would open the checkbook for under these circumstances it would be #54.

The other option I suppose is that they defer the funeral until Monday (when the players would be off anyway), have the team spend Sunday night in Dallas and fly out of there on Monday.  That's a long time to keep the family waiting for closure, though. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 15, 2011, 01:19:00 pm
Lost in all of this is a matchup I'm really interested to see...  our young, smallish DTs against the two mammoth veteran OGs of the Saints.

Jahri Evans is 6'4 318, a 6-year vet who is one of the best in the game. Opposite him is Carl Nicks, a beast of a man at 6'5, 343 that more than a few teams had on their FA wish list.  This will be a whole nother tier of players that our DTs are facing compared to the OGs on the Falcons. If our DTs' quickness can't counter their size and strength it could be a long hard day.

Both guards Evans and Nicks were named to the NFC pro bowl team last year.  Their LT is no slouch either...Bushrod.  I don't know their RT, Zach Strief.  Looks like a journeyman type who has only 8 career starts over his 6 years in the league.  And then they got this old dude at center.

I think our DBs will have to work harder this week.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 01:24:37 pm
Both guards Evans and Nicks were named to the NFC pro bowl team last year.  Their LT is no slouch either...Bushrod.  I don't know their RT, Zach Strief.  Looks like a journeyman type who has only 8 career starts over his 6 years in the league.  And then they got this old dude at center.

Bushrod is solid, but I could see us starting with Izzy over him in the hopes he can hold his own so Peppers can wreak havoc against Streif.  It looked like Izzy was drawing some double teams against the Falcons which no doubt opened things up for Peppers and even guys like Melton and Okoye. OTOH if Izzy can't it done from the blindside we may have to flip the two.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 01:41:31 pm
Both guards Evans and Nicks were named to the NFC pro bowl team last year. 

Which makes it very understandable why Kreutz would sign with the Saints, even for much less money. Olin is at the stage where he needs a lot of help from his OGs.  Help that the Bears OGs simply did not have the size or talent to provide. Evans and Nicks are better players by far than any OG tandem the Bears have had since early in Olin's career and I'm sure that factor weighed huge in his decision to finish his playing days down there.

The goal-line fail against the Packers was epic but let's not be deceived...  the Saints interior OL will make us work for everything we get. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 15, 2011, 03:55:02 pm

I would bet that the Saints just happened to be the best team/offer on the table after things went south with his hand with the Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 15, 2011, 03:59:12 pm
Injury report on the Saints (via Chicago Tribune):

Cornerback Tracy Porter was added to the injury report with a calf injury. He did not practice Thursday after feeling tightness in the calf in the morning, according to the New Orleans Times-Picayune.
 
Receiver Lance Moore (groin) practiced on a limited basis for the second straight day. Safety Roman Harper (ankle) returned to practice on a limited basis after being held out on Wednesday.

Receiver Marques Colston (collarbone), kicker Garrett Hartley (hip) and defensive tackle Tom Johnson (calf) missed Thursday's practice. Defensive tackle Shaun Rogers was excused from practice for a family matter, the Times-Picayune reported.


Bottom line, if two of the Saints' starting DBs are gimpy, we can hopefully make some hay in the air game considering all our WRs except RoyBoy are at full strength.  Assuming we can pass protect, of course.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 15, 2011, 04:12:23 pm
Bottom line, if two of the Saints' starting DBs are gimpy, we can hopefully make some hay in the air game considering all our WRs except RoyBoy are at full strength.  Assuming we can pass protect, of course.

I buy that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 15, 2011, 06:32:10 pm
Apparently the Bears are telling media that Urlacker will play Sunday
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 15, 2011, 06:37:16 pm
I feel better about our chances of beating the Aints with Urlacker than our chances without him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 15, 2011, 08:33:16 pm
Bushrod is solid, but I could see us starting with Izzy over him in the hopes he can hold his own so Peppers can wreak havoc against Streif.  It looked like Izzy was drawing some double teams against the Falcons which no doubt opened things up for Peppers and even guys like Melton and Okoye. OTOH if Izzy can't it done from the blindside we may have to flip the two.

 PAEA

 
Both guards Evans and Nicks were named to the NFC pro bowl team last year.  Their LT is no slouch either...Bushrod.  I don't know their RT, Zach Strief.  Looks like a journeyman type who has only 8 career starts over his 6 years in the league.  And then they got this old dude at center.

I think our DBs will have to work harder this week.

 PAEA ... not to be confused with Paypal ... unless a sack occurs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 15, 2011, 09:43:39 pm
Paea was inactive last week and should be inactive this week
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 15, 2011, 09:45:37 pm
Paea was inactive last week and should be inactive this week

 Why?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 16, 2011, 02:14:53 am
Because he is not up to speed in the pro game.  He is our worst D-linemen.  Of course he is inactive.  He has been a terible dissapointment.

He may be player for us next year but we won't see him much this year unless someone gets hurt. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 16, 2011, 02:19:30 am
Because he is not up to speed in the pro game.  He is our worst D-linemen.  Of course he is inactive.  He has been a terible dissapointment.

He may be player for us next year but we won't see him much this year unless someone gets hurt.

 Why has he been a terrible dissapointment?  Get me up to speed on this.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 16, 2011, 02:22:44 am
He just hasn't been getting it done.  I think he got the job done in college with his awesome strength.  In the NFL that is not enough.  He needs to learn technique.  He needs moves and counter moves.  He can't just overpower the O-line at this level because they are just as strong or stronger then him.

I think he will come on later in the year and might be a force next year.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 16, 2011, 03:15:25 am
He just hasn't been getting it done.  I think he got the job done in college with his awesome strength.  In the NFL that is not enough.  He needs to learn technique.  He needs moves and counter moves.  He can't just overpower the O-line at this level because they are just as strong or stronger then him.

I think he will come on later in the year and might be a force next year.

 If you drop a second rounder on a defense guy ... you would like to see results right now.

 Havent we been thru this wait until next year shiiit with too many players we draft?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 16, 2011, 08:17:52 am
Paea is extremely strong for his size and he plays with a high motor...  but he doesn't have a lot of mass (6'1, 300).  He's a tweener... not athletic enough to stand out as a 3-Technique, but not big enough to occupy a lot of space as a NT.  He's not a good fit for every scheme, nor is he NFL-ready at this point, which explains why he was still available toward the bottom of the 2nd round.

At this point he's basically Chris Zorich 2.0.  Which doesn't mean he was a wasted pick (yet, anyway)...  it just means it may take him awhile.

Like other people it bugs me to no end when 2nd rounders can't come in and play right away but thank goodness Melton is developing at breakneck pace and Okoye looks to be one of the best FA signings of the year by any team.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 16, 2011, 08:25:34 am
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0916-urlacher-bears-chicago--20110916,0,1571368.story

Glad to see the Bears making a good showing at the funeral..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 16, 2011, 08:27:28 am
I'm surprised there aren't more players going to the funeral. Especially from the defense.

But maybe that's the way Urlacher and his family wanted it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 16, 2011, 09:04:58 am
LOL...  beat last year's #1 seed and watch the media love come pouring in:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/15/beware-the-bears/

I'd rather be under the radar. Lovie's teams usually respond pretty well with a chip on their shoulder...  but not so much after they've had some success and positive publicity. This is the type of press that usually results in a crap-it-down-the-leg game the next week and everybody jumping in and saying "told ya so".

OTOH it does feel like there's something noticeably different -- in a good way -- about this year's edition of the Bears and if they can go on the road and beat the Saints after all the garbage that's gone down this week, that would appear to be proving-out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 16, 2011, 09:16:54 am
If you drop a second rounder on a defense guy ... you would like to see results right now.

 Havent we been thru this wait until next year shiiit with too many players we draft?


Angelo has had a track record of using high draft picks on players not ready to play. The kid needs to play but practicing with the team is a good thing. I believe it  will help him get on the field quicker.

The kid was injured in the senior bowl or some bowl game and hasnt recovered sufficiently. I believe its his ankle. So he lost some quickness and mobility.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 16, 2011, 09:23:02 am
I'm surprised there aren't more players going to the funeral. Especially from the defense.

But maybe that's the way Urlacher and his family wanted it.

I'm guessing it was agreed to send one player as a representative and Briggs ws the obvious choice. Probably will be a lot of former teammates there as well. Don't want to turn it into a circus.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 16, 2011, 09:25:32 am
Anthony Adams isn't going to be around forever.  And Paea is much the same type of player as Adams.

So I suspect the plan is to bring Paea along slowly this year and then plug him in for Adams next year or the year after that at the latest. 

OTOH I do have to agree with Wishful...  you look at Angelo going 0-for-3 on DTs taken in the 3rd round (Dvoracek, Gilbert, Harrison) and you have to wonder if the outcome with Paea will wind up being any different.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 16, 2011, 09:59:04 am
 
I have no issues with Paea...yet.  Going into the draft, and remember the draft was way back in April, they had released starter Tommie Harris.  They had Melton, who had shown flashes in the 2010 season, but hadn't started a game...ever.  They had Toeaina and Adams, both solid effort guys and Harrison, a not so solid effort guy.

That's it.

The Bears defense thrives on production of the UT - now looking at those 4 guys would you be encouraged going into a season with that lineup?

Okoye came aboard much much later in the year and could be a great pick up.

As for Paea, he's having difficulty cracking the lineup made up of a very deep and experienced group of DTs.  It's a long season - we might see him before too long.

And before anyone is going to label him a wasted draft pick.  Didn't some of you guys say the same thing about Earl Bennett when he pretty much sat out his rookie year? 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 16, 2011, 10:56:04 am
Anthony Adams isn't going to be around forever.  And Paea is much the same type of player as Adams.

So I suspect the plan is to bring Paea along slowly this year and then plug him in for Adams next year or the year after that at the latest. 

OTOH I do have to agree with Wishful...  you look at Angelo going 0-for-3 on DTs taken in the 3rd round (Dvoracek, Gilbert, Harrison) and you have to wonder if the outcome with Paea will wind up being any different.

You are also leaving out Dan Buzuin, but he wasnt a DT, but he was a 2nd round pick on the DL like Paea is.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 16, 2011, 10:59:15 am
Yup, and Bauzuin, Dvoracek and Harrison are all out of the league.  Last I heard Gilbert was hanging on by his fingernails on somebody's PS but I've got to think his eligibility is about used up.

So these are guys that by and large, not only weren't good enough to make the Bears' roster, they weren't good enough to make anybody's roster.

For 2nd and 3rd round draft picks those are pretty huge errors in judgment.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 16, 2011, 11:04:39 am
Disagree on Dvoracek. He playd pretty well until he got hurt. I don't count guys that fail because of injuries as flops unless it's a pre-existing injury that you knew about when you made the choice to draft and they never fully recovered.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 16, 2011, 11:07:21 am
Disagree on Dvoracek. He playd pretty well until he got hurt. I don't count guys that fail because of injuries as flops unless it's a pre-existing injury that you knew about when you made the choice to draft and they never fully recovered.

I agree.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 16, 2011, 11:08:03 am
Disagree on Dvoracek. He playd pretty well until he got hurt. I don't count guys that fail because of injuries as flops unless it's a pre-existing injury that you knew about when you made the choice to draft and they never fully recovered.

Didn't Dvoracek have a pretty long medical history when we took him?  I thought that's why he fell to the 3rd in the first place.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on September 16, 2011, 11:13:49 am
Most rookie first round draft picks don't start their first season.

Late second round picks shouldn't have high expectations their first year either.

I was hoping for some plays out of Paea this year too, but may have to wait.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 16, 2011, 11:19:52 am
Yap...I believe he did but was fully recovered before injuring himself again so I  don't consider that a flop. Now, if he had never recovered from his prior injuries and just never was able to get it done then I would agree to calling that a flop or blown draft pick
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 16, 2011, 02:05:06 pm
But its still banking on a guy with bad knees. 3rd round or even 4th is not where you take risk players
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 16, 2011, 02:06:11 pm
Didn't Dvoracek have a pretty long medical history when we took him?  I thought that's why he fell to the 3rd in the first place.

Dvoracek's red flag was he busted somebody's jaw in a barroom fight and may have got tossed from the school.

Tommie Harris had a medical history going into his draft but the Bears never saw the effects of those injuries during his career.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 16, 2011, 02:22:36 pm
Dvoracek's red flag was he busted somebody's jaw in a barroom fight and may have got tossed from the school.

Tommie Harris had a medical history going into his draft but the Bears never saw the effects of those injuries during his career.

Well that depends on if the leg injuries that effectively ended his career 3-4 years ago, were just aggravations of those he sustained in college (which would have been common knowledge at the time he was drafted), or if they were new injuries altogether. 

If the former case was true, you could argue that the Bears essentially gam-bled (and lost) on a player who had a greater than average chance of having a shortened career -- which is exactly how it played out as he is only 28 and will likely never play a down of pro ball again.  OTOH if the latter case is true then the Bears simply ran into some bad luck which has been nothing new for them over the years. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 16, 2011, 04:05:18 pm
IMHO it was the former case
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 16, 2011, 05:04:44 pm

I don't know.  In his first 4 years he missed 4 games.  All those came in 2006 after that serious injury in the Viking game that knocked him out for the rest of the season including the playoff run to the Super Bowl.  He appeared to recover from that and in 2007 had arguably his best year playing in all 16 games and recording 8 sacks. 

That might have been the season when he suffered the leg whip by Columbo that pretty much began the downard spiral of Tommie Harris.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 16, 2011, 08:54:30 pm
Columbo stung us twice.  That blows...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 18, 2011, 03:24:48 pm
We need to start a FIRE ANGELO petition!!! His azz is the problem with this team!! NO help at Oline, NO help at wideout! Hester is NOT a top flight wideout you dumb (*&^#*&^%$!~! Neither is Roy Williams!! We needed the last three seasons to draft high at Olineman and wideout and we did NEITHER! Instead we've got a failed string of DL picks! FIRE ANGELO NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on September 18, 2011, 03:47:29 pm
This is the team Angeloviartz built with $30mil in cap space left.  No excuses.  They failed.  And now the lack of depth will also be exposed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 18, 2011, 04:03:00 pm
I am all for firing Angelo.  The Bears have been bad at the WR, O-line and Safety position for a very long time.  He has a blind spot for those positions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 18, 2011, 04:16:45 pm

 ONE aaaaand ONE

 14 more to go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 18, 2011, 04:42:55 pm
One and One with the Oline looking as bad as it ever has....with the Pack coming in,yet....how ya think that'll pan out?

Not good.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 18, 2011, 04:49:49 pm
If this team comes out with the same Oline that finished this "game" today, against the Packers next weekend, well....it could be one of the worst home losses and embarrassments we've ever seen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 18, 2011, 04:56:11 pm
I see people are waking up here. Angelo is the problem. This team is built for a SB win and the OLine isnt even good college material.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 18, 2011, 05:57:56 pm
Did anyone see the size of that Florida State Oline last night?  Huge
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 18, 2011, 10:21:34 pm

 NOW I get it ! "OFFENSIVE" Linemen ! The joke was right there in front of me the whole time!  :D  ;)  ::)

 Cutler must have shiiit when he found out his OL elected him to be the :

 HUMAN BOWLING PIN for the game.  :-\
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 08:22:57 am
If Martz and Tice don't get a bunch of things fixed in a big hurry, we will have a top 15 draft pick next April.

I would strongly suggest that pick be spent on either a legitimate NFL LT or a #1 WR cause until we get those pieces this offense is going nowhere.  J'Marcus Webb is hands-down the worst starting LT in the league and Cutler has NO receiving options of any size to count on except Forte.

It's also time to start putting out feelers for a new OC.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 19, 2011, 09:26:24 am
So if and when Carimi comes back do we see if he can play LT and move Webb back to RT?   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 09:31:26 am
So if and when Carimi comes back do we see if he can play LT and move Webb back to RT?

I wouldn't want to try that until and unless Carimi is back to 100%.

Webb has been godawful but I really don't think you want to put a rookie in at LT who's not 100% and especially when many scouts have questioned his capabilities to play that position in the NFL to begin with.

At this point I would even say try Levi Horn at RT until Carimi can go again. Or, bench Webb and move Omiyale over to LT and play Horn on the right side.  It looks like Webb is being overwhelmed by the speed of the game and until his brain can catch up to his physical ability he doesn't belong on the field... either at L or RT.

Clearly with Louis and Carimi out of the mix for however long of time, it will be on Tice to play the OL shell game again and try to come up with some combination that works.  The 5 who were out there most of the game yesterday weren't getting it done at all.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 19, 2011, 09:36:50 am
I might put Omiyale at LT and Carimi at RT and Webb as the swing if Webb looks so bad at LT.

I expect though that we are going to ride Webb at LT as long as he is healthy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 09:46:17 am
Right now Webb is looking about as "good" as Orlando Pace did that year he was with us.

He's just not costing us near as much money to suck.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 19, 2011, 09:48:46 am
I usually wouldn't mind living with some growing pains of Webb at LT except I think we only have about 1-2 years left of the Urlacher/Peppers window. We need a trip to the dance now.

Forte might decide to walk after this year carrying the load and not getting much help on the OL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 09:56:19 am
I usually wouldn't mind living with some growing pains of Webb at LT except I think we only have about 1-2 years left of the Urlacher/Peppers window. We need a trip to the dance now.

The rate things are going we only have 1-2 years left on the Cutler window as well.

I can't help but think that if at least some of those draft picks that became Olsen, Bauzuin, Dvoracek, Harrison and Gilbert had instead gone to the OL, we wouldn't be having this discussion right now. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 09:59:48 am
If anyone is interested, after 2 games with the Panthers Greg Olsen has 5 catches for 112 yards, 0 TDs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 19, 2011, 10:01:39 am
I am all for whatever keeps Frank OMG off the field.  Webb was passable at RT last year.  This just so su-cks.  I was super upset yesterday, and none too happy today. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 19, 2011, 10:12:42 am
Wow, did I see a differant game than some of you.  I thought Webb had a really solid game.  He did have one motion penalty and might have not made the right decision when blocking inside when he should have picked up a blitzer on the outside.  He consistently left alone on the Saints RDE and held his own.

I'm not saying our O-line can't be upgraded.  But, these guys are asked to pass block for 50 freakin plays yesterday and run block about what 10?   And in Martz offense he wants the QB to sit back there and weight 5 or 6 seconds for the WRs to come open.  Not a great combination playing on a fast surface in a hostile dome.

Folks, the Saints couldn't get to Cutler with 4.  That's why they often blitzed 2 or 3 guys...consistently.   The problem was the Bears had no ability to consistently beat the blitz other than the short pass to Forte.   Quick slant to a WR...pass to the TE?   Didn't see any much of that.

The problem is not with Webb, Carimi or even OMiyale.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 10:14:38 am
At least two or three times I saw Webb crash-block inside (basically doubling a DL), while an outside guy ran free. And he had a couple penalties at least.

We'll have to agree to disagree on the assessment of the OL play yesterday.  I thought Webb and Omiyale looked awful, and even Carimi was having some troubles before he got hurt.  I suspect though that Tice will come out and say they played just fine.

But in fairness, this assumption of Martz that Kellen Davis can block DEs 1 on 1 is just wrong and has cost us dearly in both games so far.  Just cause K is as big as an OT doesn't mean he can play like one.  Since we're not throwing to him at all we might as well play a 3rd OT out there. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 19, 2011, 10:21:45 am

Maybe Webb was supposed to block inside based on the call from Garza/Cutler?  I see a lot of NFL QBs go up to the line and point out blitzers...does Cutler?   I don't know.  I thought it was mentioned one time that Chris Williams was supposed to pull out and get the outside blitzer and was late.

I can't assign blame on the mental mistakes cuz I don't know the calls.  But when I see Webb out there one on one on a DE and he's keeping him off Cutler about I don't know...50 out of 50 times I think he's doing OK for a guy playing his 2nd season in the NFL and 2nd game as a LT. 

My point is the mental part of the game can be corrected, especially if the guy has the physical tools to pass block.

As I said before, I like our 3 OTs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 10:36:24 am
It also seems asinine not to have provision for audibles, at least in obvious blitzing situations as the Bears are most assuredly going to be facing the rest of the year.

By all accounts (and contrary to public perception), Cutler has a lot of football smarts. If he can see the blitz coming and call an audible to counter it, how much more successful could we be? It seems to me like Martz' offense is wasting not only Cutler's physical abilities, but his brain as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on September 19, 2011, 10:47:28 am
I noticed last night when Philadelphia was getting blitzed like crazy they were keeping 7 blockers in and completing passes to wide outs.

Martz yesterday kept the empty backfield and cutler got creamed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 11:07:17 am
The thing with running an empty backfield offense against blitzes is, your WRs had better get open, and damn quick. Ours didn't, and we all saw the results.

If there's any question that Earl Bennett is the leader of the WR corps, there shouldn't be after yesterday.  Our WRs played like lost little girls after he got knocked out.  Sanzenbacher was the least bad of the bunch but even he had a critical drop and you could tell the noise and the physicality of the Saints D had gotten into his head by the 2nd half.  He'll be a good Tom Waddle type NFL player but he's gonna need some games to get there. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 19, 2011, 11:14:52 am

I don't disagree, though the Bears WRs had a nice game last week without much from Bennett.  No doubt this game was a game where they could have used him, especially with the Saints blitzing so heavily.

There were a couple plays where we got downfield shots from the camera.   One play it appears that Culter throw an intermediate pass down the middle of the field right to Roman Harper, who dropped it.  But on the replay you see Knox run his pattern turn around and just stop looking back at Cutler.   If he continues his route he might have caught it.   It looked like Cutler forced that throw but maybe not.

One another play Hester and Sanzenbacher run a criss cros in the middle of the field.  Sanzenbacher gets caught up in traffic but Hester breaks free to Cutler's right.  Hester slows down to look at Cutler and the ball hits in front of Hester about 5 yards. 
Why did he stop?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 19, 2011, 11:37:16 am
Time for a phone call to Randy Moss?  At this point, what's to lose?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 19, 2011, 11:41:25 am
That would add insult to injury
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 19, 2011, 11:48:55 am

Let's see what Roy Williams can do against the Pack.

We need someone to step up from our WR corp, because this weekend we'll see the same sort of schemes except it will be executed from a more talented bunch.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: VJ on September 19, 2011, 12:40:43 pm
Remember when the Puke traded up ahead of the Bears to pick up Morgan Burnett?  Burnett had seven tackles, a sack, a forced fumble and an interception during Sunday's win over the Panthers. He was slated to be Green Bay's starting safety last season before a knee injury knocked him out for the season. The Packers believe in him and he's showing why.

It's hard enough for an offense to operate without any blocking.  It's damn near impossible to do it without WRs who cannot separate.  Get well soon Bennett.

Agree about not being able to audible out of a blitz.  That concept is about as archaic as this offense. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 19, 2011, 12:54:48 pm
Let's see what Roy Williams can do against the Pack.

We need someone to step up from our WR corp, because this weekend we'll see the same sort of schemes except it will be executed from a more talented bunch.

I have no desire to see just one catch for 10 yards by Roy Williams against the Pack.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 01:02:50 pm
There were a couple plays where we got downfield shots from the camera.   One play it appears that Culter throw an intermediate pass down the middle of the field right to Roman Harper, who dropped it.  But on the replay you see Knox run his pattern turn around and just stop looking back at Cutler.   If he continues his route he might have caught it.   It looked like Cutler forced that throw but maybe not.

One another play Hester and Sanzenbacher run a criss cros in the middle of the field.  Sanzenbacher gets caught up in traffic but Hester breaks free to Cutler's right.  Hester slows down to look at Cutler and the ball hits in front of Hester about 5 yards. 
Why did he stop?


I know why.  I really think that knockout blow to Bennett got inside the rest of our WRs heads and they were playing timid after that.

None of them seemed real anxious to go over the middle for the rest of the game. Lots of alligator arms and "give up" routes out there yesterday.  Roman Harper not only took Bennett out of the game physically, he psyched the rest of our WRs out for the rest of the game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 19, 2011, 01:07:10 pm

That had to be the case with Sanzenbacher on his drop...easy catch.


So whats up with the injuries?  I figure Bennett and Wright should be back...along with Chris Harris, Roy Williams and Barber.  Louis probably not and I don't think they'll rush back Carimi though he said he's OK.

We'll need all those guys this weekend.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 01:08:52 pm
Wow, I really don't want to face the Packers with a starting right side OL of Spencer and OMG.

But that could well be what happens.

Webb, Williams, Garza, Spencer, Omiyale....  < gulp >.

If the Packers can somehow shut down Forte as well as our WRs we have no chance. It will be an epic blowout.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 02:32:49 pm
Not looking good for a return to the playoffs.

3rd in the division after only 2 games, down in the tiebreaker to the Saints, a Lions team that appears to have improved beyond even their fans' wildest dreams and the Packers with no apparent weaknesses.

Oh yeah and two starters down on an OL that was a work in progress to begin with.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 19, 2011, 02:44:24 pm
Everyone is making good observations. Yep, too many pass plays, too much empty backfield which is completely baffling given the amount of blitzing they were doing, yep couple players are not pro bowl caliber players or even close, yes the TE was blowing it big time, yes we need better wideouts, I mean it was like a clusterF of what NOT to do on heavy blitzing yesterday. 7 step drops?? Whaaaa???? Martz...get off the drugs,man....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 19, 2011, 02:45:47 pm
I'm not on the Lions bandwagon jussst yet. I'll bet they get pounded by the two teams we just played, especially the Saints. We shall see...we've had the leagues toughest schedule starting out...it gets easier in a couple weeks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 02:47:17 pm
I'm also not sure I'm digging the whole deal of Martz being in the press box vs. on field level.

Sure seems like he didn't have a clue what was going on yesterday even though he could presumably see the field better from the box. Two offensive timeouts in the first quarter?  Seriously?  That's just bush league.  Almost seemed like he knew his gameplan was gonna p**s Cutler off so he sat up in the box so he wouldn't have to deal with him.

Get out of the box and back down on the field, talk to your QB face to face, and get a handle on what's going on, man.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 02:48:18 pm
I'm not on the Lions bandwagon jussst yet. I'll bet they get pounded by the two teams we just played, especially the Saints. We shall see...we've had the leagues toughest schedule starting out...it gets easier in a couple weeks.

What I can't figure out is how on earth that Saints team ever lost to Seattle in the playoffs.

The Saints gave up 41 in that playoff loss and 42 to the Packers in Game 1 this season.  83 points in their last two games. And we could only get 13 against them.  Pathetic.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davep on September 19, 2011, 03:14:37 pm
I think the Bears have a better chance to beat Green Bay than they did the Saints.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 03:31:50 pm
I think the Bears have a better chance to beat Green Bay than they did the Saints.

We'll see.  I guarantee that McCarthy and Capers were not pleased with how close those last two games against us were, and have been working on ways to beat us much more convincingly.  Not to mention that when we last played the Pack they were down starters to injuries while we were as healthy as we had been all year.  This year those positions are exactly reversed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 19, 2011, 03:44:32 pm
If Martz and Tice don't get a bunch of things fixed in a big hurry, we will have a top 15 draft pick next April.

Totally agree.  And maybe HIGHER than a top 15 pick!

Quote
I would strongly suggest that pick be spent on either a legitimate NFL LT or a #1 WR cause until we get those pieces this offense is going nowhere. 

They did but draft a LT but Tice stuck him at RIGHT TACKLE!  That's on Tice alone.  Then they drafted a LT a couple years ago in Chris Williams that hasn't panned out.  So they did draft on the line but, oh well.  As for a #1 WR,  that's why they signed RWilliams for, isn't it?

Quote
J'Marcus Webb is hands-down the worst starting LT in the league and Cutler has NO receiving options of any size to count on except Forte.

Well he was totally improving at RIGHT TACKLE last season but was moved to the most important position on the offensive line where he obviously has no experience at that spot.  As for the comment about the receivers, well it's hard for them to do anything when the offensive line stinks and can't protect the franchise QB to give him time to throw it to them.  It starts up front period.

Quote
It's also time to start putting out feelers for a new OC.

Totally agree!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 19, 2011, 03:45:58 pm
So if and when Carimi comes back do we see if he can play LT and move Webb back to RT?   

I've been preaching that ever since training camp.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 04:08:28 pm
We'll see.  I guarantee that McCarthy and Capers were not pleased with how close those last two games against us were, and have been working on ways to beat us much more convincingly.  Not to mention that when we last played the Pack they were down starters to injuries while we were as healthy as we had been all year.  This year those positions are exactly reversed.

I'm gonna partially retract this statement cause after I posted it, news came out that the Packers have lost Nick Collins for the year with a neck injury.

So that evens the field a bit, but not by much as they still have Morgan Burnett, the 2nd year guy, who had a huge game yesterday.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 19, 2011, 04:53:06 pm
Capers is going to put together so many complicated blitz packages Cutler wont have a clue where it is coming from. After he gets hit /knocked down 10 or 15 times he will get jittery and shell shocked and be owned by the Pack D.  Sad, so sad. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 19, 2011, 05:03:35 pm
You want the good news or the bad news:

Carimi suffered a knee sprain, according to Smith, but an NFL source said the player has a knee subluxation (a partial dislocation), an injury he suffered previously at Wisconsin.

The good news is that there is no ligament damage. The bad news is Carimi likely will miss the next two games vs. the Green Bay Packers and Carolina Panthers. He left the stadium Sunday night wearing a brace, and said he was confident he would be OK


Good he might only miss 2 weeks.  Bad he had this injury before in College????  Dont remember hearing about that before. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 19, 2011, 05:11:37 pm
Yeah Carimi was dinged up a bit in college.  Nothing major.  Could be a part of why he fell as far as he did though.

Anymore it's almost impossible to find a kid coming out of college who doesn't have at least a couple things on their medical record. Especially a lineman and particularly someone who played as many games as he did.

Just hope this doesn't turn into a Colombo or Tommie Harris thing.  Based on past history I have very little confidence in our medical and training staffs, especially where leg injuries are concerned.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 19, 2011, 05:36:04 pm
Unless they come from Illinois.  All the O-linemen there wear knee braces on both legs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on September 19, 2011, 05:48:23 pm
An experienced Omiyale may be better against the pack at picking up the blitz than Carimi.

Not a huge compliment for Omi. though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 19, 2011, 07:07:47 pm
Lovie on play-calling imbalance: 'We'll clean it up'


http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-lovie-on-playcalling-imbalance-well-clean-it-up-20110919,0,7742636.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 19, 2011, 08:58:59 pm
"We'll clean it up" bs.....yea whatever. How many times did this happen LAST season and has it been 'cleaned up'?? This is just so frustrating dealing with this team....they've needed WR's and OL and they go out and load up on safeties and DLmen and whosits and whatsits and players we don't need and they play a good game and then go out and call the next game like it's their first and spout the same rhetorical CRAP afterwards like they did last season and the crap keeps rolling down the hill. Three years ago,we had problems with the Oline and recievers,two years ago we had problems with the WR and OL, one year ago, ditto...THIS season, guess what. It's time for a change, folks....it's time!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 20, 2011, 12:37:54 am

 Cutler piiised and G.B. at home. This is it.  >:(
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 20, 2011, 08:10:33 am
Cutler piiised and G.B. at home. This is it.  >:(

What, when Cutler gets carted off on a stretcher?  ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 20, 2011, 08:37:29 am
What I want to know is why Lovie didn't "clean up" the playcalling DURING THE GAME.

There's this thing called "halftime adjustments".  The good coaches do it.  It's part of the job description, especially at the NFL level.

That's why I just have to laugh at all these ignoramuses who still defend Lovie as a good coach.  He is just about the worst for in-game management and adjustments of any coach I've ever seen.  It's like when the ball is kicked off he takes the next 3 and a half hours off.  Maybe he's a decent coach in practice and preparation (debatable), but during the game he's worthless.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 20, 2011, 08:42:57 am
Cutler piiised and G.B. at home. This is it.  >:(

So are you saying that a pi-ssed Cutler will have a great game...  or that he's gonna suck?

With him it could go either way and you won't know which way until after they kick it off.  That NFC-C game last year, even before the Packers started pounding on him he was "off".  You could just tell it was gonna be one of those "bad Jay" games. Hopefully this isn't one of those cause we're gonna need everyone hitting on all cylinders to even keep it close.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 20, 2011, 08:52:26 am
Another factor is who or what is he angry about? Sometimes thats a good thing and sometimes it leads to wrecklessness which leads to destruction. We dont need that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 20, 2011, 08:56:54 am
Best thing that could happen Sunday is that the Packers win the flip, take the ball and our D forces a 3-and-out or better still, gets a turnover.

Worst thing that could happen is we win the flip, take the ball and go 3-and-out or worse, turn it over.

I have a feeling this is gonna be one of those games where we'll know by the end of the 1st quarter whether we have a prayer of winning or not.  By the end of the first 15 minutes we'll either be close and playing well, or the game will already be out of hand.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 20, 2011, 09:37:51 am
In the offseason I was critical of the decision to just give the LT job to Webb without letting Carimi get a shot.  But after watching a couple games I see that Webb can handle LT and maybe next year they can revisit the decision again and swap the players if need be.  Lots of LTs get their feet wet their rookie season on the right side.  If Carimi was a Jimbo Covert, which he is not, you could just hand him the LT job.

Bears/Packers game...anything can happen.  I'll give you a game plan.  Get Bennett, Barber and Roy Williams healthy.  Let Forte and Barber run the ball.  Get that FB involved in the offense - Klutts can catch the ball out of the back field and get the TEs involved in the passing game and not simply as blockers.

And the throw the ball deep...really deep once in a while...Bears haven't done that all season.  The Saints sent 2 WRs at our safety Sunday and got a TD - you telling me that we can't do the same with speedsters Hester and Knox?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 20, 2011, 09:55:22 am
And the throw the ball deep...really deep once in a while...Bears haven't done that all season.  The Saints sent 2 WRs at our safety Sunday and got a TD - you telling me that we can't do the same with speedsters Hester and Knox?

Not without protection we can't.

I like the rest of your gameplan though. The biggest piece of it being, of course, for guys like RoyBoy and Barber to man-up and play.  I totally realize the difference between "hurting" and "injured".  The guys who are truly injured (Carimi) get a pass but this is the freakin Packers at home and going down 2 games in the division if we lose so it's all hands on deck as far as I'm concerned. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 20, 2011, 10:47:11 am

If you can establish some assemblance of a running game then you can get pass protection with play action so you can try a deep ball or two during the course of a game.

The bomb should be part of any game plan, just as screens and draws are.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 20, 2011, 10:58:33 am
Sounds like it should be a decent day at Soldier's on Sunday.  Forecast from NOAA Website:

Sunday: A slight chance of showers. Partly sunny, with a high near 66.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 20, 2011, 12:33:39 pm
I thought this was fishy when I was watching it in real time...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/20/fox-sports-admits-they-fabricated-newspaper-headlines/

I mean, wow.  That's a serious lack of professionalism by Fox.  They've always had a definite anti-Bears bias but this takes it to new depths.

You watch, they won't even have the stones to have Buck make an apology on the air next week during the Packers game.  Buck hates the Bears, it was probably his idea in the first place.

If I were in the Bears front office, or with either of the Chicago papers -- or if I were Cutler's attorney -- I'd be looking at legal options right now.  That's defamation of character if I ever saw it. 

The judgment against Fox should include sizable punitive damages as well as the following:

- A $1 million donation from Fox to Jay Cutler's diabetes foundation

- A public admission of guilt and apologies to the Bears, the Chicago media and Jay Cutler, by the head of Fox Sports, aired live and nationwide prior to kickoff of football coverage the first Sunday after the judgment is announced. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 20, 2011, 12:51:27 pm

I mean, wow.  That's a serious lack of professionalism by Fox.  They've always had a definite anti-Bears bias but this takes it to new depths.

You watch, they won't even have the stones to have Buck make an apology on the air next week during the Packers game.  Buck hates the Bears, it was probably his idea in the first place.



Just part of the reason I hate Joe Buck.  I wouldnt be surprised if he typed those fake headlines out himself.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 20, 2011, 01:25:22 pm
Best thing that could happen Sunday is that the Packers win the flip, take the ball and our D forces a 3-and-out or better still, gets a turnover.

Worst thing that could happen is we win the flip, take the ball and go 3-and-out or worse, turn it over.

I have a feeling this is gonna be one of those games where we'll know by the end of the 1st quarter whether we have a prayer of winning or not.  By the end of the first 15 minutes we'll either be close and playing well, or the game will already be out of hand.

Here I thought you were going to say the best thing that could happen Sunday was the Packers run up 60 pts on the Bears. Maybe then we get rid of clown central  in the front office
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on September 20, 2011, 02:25:41 pm
Very early in the game Buck took time to say with all the punishment Cutler went through last year without complaining there is no wany he lacked courage.

Johnston agreed.  Didn't see the part with the headlines.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 20, 2011, 03:06:29 pm
I was mistaken, Joe Buck wasn't calling the game (Game 1) that they led off with those fake headlines.  That was the Albert guy and Daryl Johnston. 

Buck and Aikman called the Saints game, and unfortunately, are calling Sundays game agianst the Pack as well.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 20, 2011, 03:26:50 pm

I was a bit surprised that Daryl Johnston would have participated in the fake headline thing.  Was he just told to say that or did they go over that in a pre-production meeting before the game? He's got too much integrity to stoop that low.

But Buck and Aikman went out of there way to support Cutler.

To me the whole thing was a non-story from the beginning.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 20, 2011, 04:12:16 pm
I was watching the Saints game in a sports bar and they didn't have the sound on so I don't know what was said about Cutler during that game.  I did notice that very much like in the NFC-C game, the cameras conveniently cut to an apparent blow-up between Cutler and a Bears coach (which was replayed at least two more times throughout the game), and then again to a shot showing Cutler standing on the sidelines a couple dozen yards removed from the rest of the team.  You don't need audio to know what story they were trying to tell there.

But to make up headlines calling a player's character into question...  and then attribute them to the hometown press...  that's serious business.  Everyone knows NFL TV coverage is more about theater, drama and ratings than actual facts, but this was way over the line. Lawsuits (and big settlements) are warranted and I hope will be forthcoming.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 20, 2011, 04:51:51 pm

Aikman (and Buck) backed Cutler.  Aikman's been there - done that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 20, 2011, 05:14:08 pm
When Cutler was standing by himself that far down the sideline he was doing it to watch the game and to stay out of the defensive players way.  Aikman said he did the same thing.  Also in the late game Rivers was seen doing the same thing.

The reason Cutler was yelling at the QB coach is because the plays were coming in so damn late.  I was pissed too!  He was getting the play with like ten seconds to call it in the huddle, get to the line and snap the ball.  He had to waste two time outs due to the play call coming in late.  Other times he barely got the snap off and what is worse when you do that it gives the defense an advantage cause they know the ball will be snapped right before the time runs out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 20, 2011, 05:38:40 pm
As if Lovie didn't have enough sideline gaffes

Steve Rosenbloom/chicagotribune.com
9:06 a.m. CDT, September 20, 2011


And now we come to Lovie Smith’s newest sideline brain cramp:

The Bears coach was too lame to remove either Jay Cutler or Mike Martz from Sunday’s pantsing in New Orleans.

I thought Smith had learned.

I thought wrong.

On Monday, Smith said he never thought about pulling Cutler in the final minutes of the “Slaughter in the Superdome.’’

Nobody on the Bears’ line could block. Nobody on the Bears’ line looked as if they even understood the concept. Nobody ordered running plays. All of this came on Smith’s watch, so I’d say he could be charged with being an accessory.

Smith said by way of excuse Monday that you learn things when you’re in tough situations and you need to go through them together and blah, blah, blah. While some of that sentiment is true, it’s also a year late.

Smith obviously didn’t learn from last season’s “Massacre in the Meadowlands.’’

You remember that: The Giants sacked Cutler a record nine times in the first half and finished him off with a concussion because Smith’s offensive coordinator was flying over the cuckoo’s nest.

Some of it was on the players. When you have eight guys and they can’t block four rushers, that’s on the dorks in uniform. But most of the time, Martz was putting his players in a position to fail, the worst charge against a coach.

And now we come to the second half in New Orleans. It wasn’t as back as the Meadowland, but with the six sacks and a game total of 16 quarterback hits, it looked like the Saints found out Cutler had just signed his organ donor card.

You’d hope the head coach could protect his quarterback better than his blockers and offensive coordinator did. Guess not.

We’re talking about a quarterback with concussion issues, remember. So, it takes less of a hit to turn Cutler’s brain into minestrone. And here was Smith, continuing to send Cutler into the huddle under these curcimstances, a loss of a game a given, a loss of all mental faculties apparently the goal.

If a coach is going to play the stupid card, then at least stop the guy from dropping back. No more passes. Handoffs only, got it? I realize it looks like a team is giving up, same as pulling the starting quarterback. But, tough. I’d rather give up a game where the players and offensive coaches appear to have no clue than give up the life of the starter at the most important position on the team. Hel-LO!

Smith, however, did not tell Cutler to sit and did not tell Martz to stop his nonsense.

But hey, at least Smith needed less than a day to realize a 52-11 pass-run distribution was lunacy. He didn’t use the word lunacy, but he indicated Monday he had spoken to Martz about achieving a pass-run balance that is somewhat less ridiculous.

Of course, a balanced offense still won’t work if you can’t block it.

We already know the Bears can’t block the craziness that Martz called Sunday. We do know they faked a balanced offense after the bye last season, winning five in a row and six or seven.

They lost two games to the Packers, both of which had Martz’s OD’ing on his vision of an offense with a 4-1 pass-run ratio that the Bears couldn’t execute, still can’t execute, and won’t be able to execute as long as management refuses to improve the line and receivers.

Still, say this for Smith: He didn’t wait almost a month like last year to call Martz into the principal’s office. A smart coach might actually do something during the game while watching it from the sidelines, but I suppose any form of action by the coach before Halloween would represent progress. Perhaps he learned a little something.

And I believe we know why Martz hasn’t received a contract extension.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on September 20, 2011, 05:54:10 pm
This has been Lovie's MO all-along IMHO.  He and his staff are incapable of making in-game adjustments.  In-game, it's always "work the plan, work the plan, work the plan."   And after the game it's always "hey guys, we're gonna re-work the plan." 
 
If a bird crapped on his head, he would be all like "Hmmm, I better not walk under any more birds".  And then he'd just keep on strolling on down the road with bird crap dripping down his skull.  Clueless.
 
Funny though, we'll all forgive him if Da Beloved beat the hell out of the Pack next week!!
 
 
 
 
 
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on September 20, 2011, 05:59:05 pm
There would be huge media meltdown if Cutler was taken out of the game early.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on September 20, 2011, 07:03:19 pm
NEVER bet on a Chi-GB game, no matter who has done what earlier.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 21, 2011, 07:55:55 am
The reason Cutler was yelling at the QB coach is because the plays were coming in so damn late.  I was ****ed too!  He was getting the play with like ten seconds to call it in the huddle, get to the line and snap the ball.  He had to waste two time outs due to the play call coming in late. 

I remember this happening a lot last year (timeouts being wasted by the offense for no reason than that they didn't have their sh*t together on the call).  Usually when it happened you knew we were in for a rough game offensively.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 21, 2011, 08:24:23 am
I dunno about anyone else but I can't help but feel we would be getting a lot more out of the talent on this team if a guy like Bill Cowher or Jeff Fischer were at the helm.  No question we have less talent than most of the teams we will face at positions such as OL, WR and S... but Lovie & Co. don't put the guys we do have in positions to succeed and that's the first job of a coaching staff, seems to me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on September 21, 2011, 08:59:03 am
Take the Pack minus the 4.5 to the bank.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 21, 2011, 09:01:20 am
Not gonna happen. Bears have never done it, won't start now. Either one of those two would fire EVERYBODY on staff and start over. The new McCaskey so far seems a copy of them all. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Hey! That could be a line for a song! Who do I call about that?
Who?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 21, 2011, 05:25:30 pm
Bears' Cutler unsure he can last at this rate


http://espn.go.com/chicago/nfl/story/_/id/7000616/chicago-bears-quarterback-jay-cutler-unsure-survive-season-getting-hit-rate
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 21, 2011, 06:15:35 pm
New Sod Installed At Soldier Field — Again


http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2011/09/21/new-sod-installed-at-soldier-field-again/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 21, 2011, 06:22:04 pm
Coaches intend to protect Cutler

 

Posted: 9/21/2011 5:45:00 PM

Jay Cutler conceded Wednesday that he doesn’t know whether he would make it through the entire season if he continues to get hit like he did during last Sunday’s loss to the New Orleans Saints.
 
The quarterback’s coaches don’t intend to find out.
 
“If you throw the ball that much, you’re going to lose him, so you can’t do that and we won’t,” offensive coordinator Mike Martz said Wednesday after practice. “We want to be balanced.
 
“Anytime he throws the ball I get nervous. You get close to someone like this, you worry about him. They’re like your own kids. But he’s one of probably the most tough—physically tough, mentally tough—people I’ve ever been around. He’s incredibly tough, so from that part of it I don’t worry about it.”
 
Offensive line coach Mike Tice told reporters that he empathizes with Cutler and vowed that the Bears would improve their pass protection.
 
“I don’t know if you know this, but I played quarterback at Maryland,” Tice said. “I’ve been hit that hard before. It doesn’t feel real good.
 
“As blockers across the board—there’s a lot of blame to be shared around and we certainly have ours in our room—we don’t want to see him get hit like that. When you’re playing football, the guy next to you and the guy with the ball in his hand, you don’t ever want anyone to hit him because that’s like letting someone hit your brother and you don’t ever want your brother to get touched.
 
“So that should [tick] you off and if it doesn’t [tick] you off, then we have the wrong guys. My point right now is I don’t think we have the wrong guys. I think we have the right guys and we’ll get it fixed.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 21, 2011, 06:22:29 pm
Omiyale set to replace Carimi

 

Posted: 9/21/2011 5:31:00 PM

Bears offensive line coach Mike Tice said Wednesday that rookie right tackle Gabe Carimi suffered a “serious injury” last Sunday in New Orleans and will miss “an extended period of time.”
 
The first-round draft pick was replaced by Frank Omiyale late in the first half after hurting his right knee while pass blocking. It’s similar to an injury that Carimi sustained during his college career at Wisconsin.
 
“Gabe had a serious injury,” Tice said. “He’s had it before. Hopefully it’s not going to be forever, but it’s going to be an extended period of time. It’s unfortunate because he was really playing good football for us and now you’ve got to replace him. So you replace him and make sure that you can still do some things that you want to do offensively. He’s an elite player, so you lost an elite player. That’s never a good thing.”
 
Tice said that Omiyale will start at right tackle Sunday against the Packers and that Lance Louis will return to the starting lineup when he recovers from the ankle injury that he suffered in the season opener versus the Falcons. Louis did not play in New Orleans and was limited in practice Wednesday.
 
Asked by a reporter if he would consider moving Louis to right tackle, Tice said: “You guys have been around me a year. You know I’ll consider anything. I actually lost 12 pounds and I’m trying my pads on tomorrow. I don’t know if I’ve got anything in me but the National Anthem, but I’m certainly going to give it a whirl.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 21, 2011, 06:22:48 pm
Injuries won't alter game plan

 

Posted: 9/21/2011 3:35:00 PM

Although injuries continue to hamper the Bears offense, there are no plans to limit the playbook Sunday when the Green Bay Packers visit Soldier Field.
 
“We’re going to do what we do,” quarterback Jay Cutler said Wednesday. “It’s not like we’re out there busting plays or forgetting stuff. We’re just missing one little thing offensively. Like I said last year, this takes 11 guys and if we have one miscue, the whole thing’s going to go up in smoke. I don’t think we’re going to dial anything back.”
 
Receiver Earl Bennett (chest) and tackle Gabe Carimi (knee) did not practice Wednesday. Running back Marion Barber (calf), guard Lance Louis (ankle) and receiver Roy Williams (groin) were limited. Although it’s unclear how many players will miss Sunday’s game, it will be business as usual on offense. View injury report
 
“Did we change coordinators? If we didn’t change coordinators, we’ve got the same offense, so we’re ready to play,” Williams said. “Whoever has to step up and play, that’s what they’re going to have to do.”
 
The Bears are also dealing with injuries at safety, with Major Wright (head/neck) sitting out practice Wednesday and Chris Harris (hamstring) participating on a limited basis.
 
For the Packers, linebacker Frank Zombo (shoulder) is out; and linebacker Clay Matthews (quadriceps) and cornerback Charles Woodson (foot) did not practice.
 
Tackle Chad Clifton (knee), cornerbacks Davon House (ankle) and Tramon Williams (shoulder), defensive end Ryan Pickett (foot), and linebacker Vic So’oto (back) were limited; and tight end Jermichael Finley (ankle) and running back Alex Green (Achilles) worked out without restrictions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 21, 2011, 06:37:28 pm
SING it with me!!  'Delusionaaaaaal, Delusionaaaaaal, they are soo Delusionaaaaal!!' (http://www.oocities.org/soho/studios/2098/notes.gif)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on September 21, 2011, 07:37:31 pm
Packers' Rodgers says Urlacher is his 'favorite' competitor

 
e-mail
print
By Bob Wolfley of the Journal Sentinel

Sept. 20, 2011 |(15) Comments
 
Quarterback Aaron Rodgers was asked during a radio interview on Tuesday about playing against Bears middle linebacker Brian Urlacher, whose Bears will play the Packers on Sunday.
 
Rodgers made his remarks during his weekly Tuesday  visit with WAUK-AM (540) in Milwaukee.

"It's a lot of fun," Rodgers said. "It really is. He's my favorite player to play against, and a guy I really respect. I respect the way he plays. He plays a clean game. Not a dirty player. Not a reckless out-of-control player. I think he really appreciates the game and respects the game and has played it well for a long time.
 
"My heart goes out to him, losing his mom," Rodgers said. "Can't imagine what that would be like. So I look forward to giving him my best when I see him on Sunday and then trying to beat him. There are a lot of dummy calls that go on. There is such a familiarity with the individual calls that we both use a number of dummy words out there, mixed in with some words that actually mean something. It's a chess match. But it's exciting to play against Brian to try to beat him at the mental game."
 
Rodgers also said what many players, including the Bears, have said about the turf at Soldier Field - it is the worst he has encountered.
 
"The turf is the worst, yes," Rodgers said. "It's longer than at any other stadium. I'm glad we are again down there early, like we were last year. Late in the year it gets real bad."
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 22, 2011, 05:16:31 am

 Forget about the past

 Autumn Chicago Soldiers

 BEARS  PACKERS

 Future

 Playoffs
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 22, 2011, 08:08:54 am
Good god how much must it cost each time they re-sod Soldier Field?  They could have paid for FieldTurf many times over by now.

This stubbornness about the playing surface is not only foolish from a player injury perspective, it's financially irresponsible.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 22, 2011, 08:38:35 am
Good god how much must it cost each time they re-sod Soldier Field?  They could have paid for FieldTurf many times over by now.

This stubbornness about the playing surface is not only foolish from a player injury perspective, it's financially irresponsible.

Yeah, unless you own a sod farm.   Just saying.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 22, 2011, 09:31:42 am
Coaches intend to protect Cutler

 

Posted: 9/21/2011 5:45:00 PM

Jay Cutler conceded Wednesday that he doesn’t know whether he would make it through the entire season if he continues to get hit like he did during last Sunday’s loss to the New Orleans Saints.
 
The quarterback’s coaches don’t intend to find out.
 
“If you throw the ball that much, you’re going to lose him, so you can’t do that and we won’t,” offensive coordinator Mike Martz said Wednesday after practice. “We want to be balanced.
 
“Anytime he throws the ball I get nervous. You get close to someone like this, you worry about him. They’re like your own kids. But he’s one of probably the most tough—physically tough, mentally tough—people I’ve ever been around. He’s incredibly tough, so from that part of it I don’t worry about it.”
 
Offensive line coach Mike Tice told reporters that he empathizes with Cutler and vowed that the Bears would improve their pass protection.
 
“I don’t know if you know this, but I played quarterback at Maryland,” Tice said. “I’ve been hit that hard before. It doesn’t feel real good.
 
“As blockers across the board—there’s a lot of blame to be shared around and we certainly have ours in our room—we don’t want to see him get hit like that. When you’re playing football, the guy next to you and the guy with the ball in his hand, you don’t ever want anyone to hit him because that’s like letting someone hit your brother and you don’t ever want your brother to get touched.
 
“So that should [tick] you off and if it doesn’t [tick] you off, then we have the wrong guys. My point right now is I don’t think we have the wrong guys. I think we have the right guys and we’ll get it fixed.”

Like Dad always said, "Talk is cheap, its action that counts." We shall see what they do to protect Cutler. Needless to say I am not as optimistic as Dallas that the  problems will get fixed with the current personnel.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 22, 2011, 11:23:36 am
If they don't back up the talk with action, we'll all get to see what it's like to have a franchise QB on IR for the majority of a season.

And we can start thinking about a Top 10 draft pick.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 22, 2011, 11:44:52 am
If they don't back up the talk with action, we'll all get to see what it's like to have a franchise QB on IR for the majority of a season.

And we can start thinking about a Top 10 draft pick.

Oh no, some people actually believe Mr Haney is a legit NFL QB who just doesnt get a chance to play.  ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 22, 2011, 12:27:52 pm
If Cutler and Urlacher both get hurt can we just start up the 2012 Draft thread?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 22, 2011, 12:49:47 pm
If Cutler and Urlacher both get hurt can we just start up the 2012 Draft thread?

You can add Forte to that list too.  Without him this offense would be lucky to net 100 yards a game. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 22, 2011, 12:57:52 pm
You can add Forte to that list too.  Without him this offense would be lucky to net 100 yards a game.

I think Marion Barber could fill in for Forte, if he can stay healthy, but yeah, you probably could add Forte to that list.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 22, 2011, 01:12:50 pm
Barber can't help us if he's never healthy enough to play.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 22, 2011, 01:13:57 pm
Like Dad always said, "Talk is cheap, its action that counts." We shall see what they do to protect Cutler. Needless to say I am not as optimistic as Dallas that the  problems will get fixed with the current personnel.

Looks like Earl Bennett is out, hopefully they can get Roy back Sunday.  Sanzenbacher lost points with me with that drop, but he gets another shot this weekend with Earl out.  And Sam Hurd can't do any worse then our guys have done against the Packer's DBs in the past.  He's got some size - use it. Packers'  Nick Collins is a huge loss for them but they got Peprah ready to step in - he was the starter last year.

Bears have a FB this year, time to use him.  Let him lead block for Forte to open up the run and on pass plays keep both Forte and Klutts in to pass block.  If the Packers don't blitz you can release Forte and Klutts appears to have decent hands for a guy that goes 260lbs to catch a ball or two.

As for the TE, have him help out the tackle not REPLACE the tackle on pass blocks - even a chip can slow a rusher down some.  And oh yeah, you can throw to Kellen Davis, he's a pretty good receiver and he's got speed to go downfield too.

Packers will be loading up against the run Sunday with 8 in the box and there will be both run and pass blitzes.  Bears have to mix it up, don't give up on Forte and give them a dose of Barber for 10 runs or so.  Run some short pass plays and don't just send Cutler back there waiting for those 20 yard passes to develop. 

And how about a deep ball...we've got the speed at WR.

Defensively, we got to get Chris Harris back at safety.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 22, 2011, 02:19:56 pm
Kellen Davis is the only pass catching threat that's big enough for Cutler to have a chance of seeing against the intense pressure that is sure to be in his face all day.  Also IIRC Kellen knocked a DB out of the game in our playoff win against the Seahawks last year. If he can take one of the Packers' DBs out of the equation in the same way it would help our odds immensely.

But we've got to throw to him for that to have a chance of happening. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 22, 2011, 02:55:14 pm
I've been hoping to catch a replay of the game on NFLN all week but haven't seen it playing yet.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 22, 2011, 02:58:34 pm
I've been hoping to catch a replay of the game on NFLN all week but haven't seen it playing yet.

Don't waste your time... the Bears were terrible.  Think last year's Giants game only without the concussion.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 22, 2011, 03:18:45 pm
Saints’ Harper: NFL admits error on Cutler hard-hit call

ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 22, 2011 1:08PM


Saints strong safety Roman Harper says the NFL has notified the team that game officials were wrong to throw a flag for Harper’s hard hit on Chicago quarterback Jay Cutler.

The flag flew moments after the quarterback threw an incomplete pass in the first half of New Orleans’ 30-13 victory over the Bears last Sunday. The call on third-and-6 extended what turned out to be Chicago’s lone touchdown drive of the game.

“When I saw the flag. I couldn’t believe it. Cutler went to begging for it and they gave it to him,” Harper said. “The bad thing is they got points off of it.”

Harper credited Saints coaches for telling him to forget about the flag and remain aggressive. The Saints continued to blitz relentlessly and wound up sacking Cutler six times, with Harper getting two sacks and a forced fumble.

“Pretty much as soon as the play was over, I think coach (Sean) Payton called timeout and really got after the ref,” Harper said. “The coaches were like, ‘Keep playing. Don’t worry about it. That was a (bad) call. Just keep balling and don’t worry about that.’”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 22, 2011, 03:32:28 pm
I'm betting that's why they never reviewed that Sproles non-TD even though by league rule all scoring plays are supposed to be reviewed.

That was the make-up call.  Or in this case, non-call.

Personally I think the Harper hit on Bennett was more worthy of a flag than the Cutler hit.  But whatever. More power to the Saints if they've got a Safety that can bring it like that, cause we certainly don't.

Officiating in that game was just fuc-ked up all the way around.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 22, 2011, 04:21:10 pm
Nice draft pick, Ruskell:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/22/aaron-curry-is-headed-to-the-bench/

So glad we can look forward to his genius filling the void after Angelo moves on...   :(

And guess who just became the #1 target on the Bears 2012 FA list?  It'll be seeya Briggs and hello Curry.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 22, 2011, 04:39:25 pm
Personally I think the Harper hit on Bennett was more worthy of a flag than the Cutler hit.  But whatever. More power to the Saints if they've got a Safety that can bring it like that, cause we certainly don't.

We might, but we haven't blitzed a safety this year that I can recall, just DJ Moore.  Last year they'd occassionally send Manning, but I can't recall Wright or Harris being sent.  And I can't every recall Tillman or Jennings blitzing.   Maybe they'll blitz Merriweather.

But as Aikman stated Sunday,  they Bears don't try to fool you with their defense, they just line up and hope you make a mistake along the way.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 22, 2011, 04:43:02 pm
But as Aikman stated Sunday,  they Bears don't try to fool you with their defense, they just line up and hope you make a mistake along the way.

And that's what has me nervous about this season.  We have a lot of teams on our schedule whose offenses don't make a lot of mistakes.  Especially in the first half of the year.

At some point your defense has to be able to force the issue if needed, whether that be through successful blitzing, good tight pass coverage, a key INT or whatever.  We saw that kind of game-changing defensive play against the Falcons but not against the Saints so it's hard to know how much we'll be able to rely on our D this year. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 23, 2011, 02:45:29 am

 Anybody know what our OL is going to look like up to the last minute of the game?
 
 Who gets shifted where?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 23, 2011, 07:49:13 am
teams that have a really good Oline with a QB that can get the ball out quickly is a nightmare for us.
The Saints are the ideal team to beat our cover 2 D.
That being said, if our O didn't poop the bed we would have made a game of it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 23, 2011, 08:23:24 am
teams that have a really good Oline with a QB that can get the ball out quickly is a nightmare for us.

This would describe the Packers as well as the Saints.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 23, 2011, 09:08:15 am

Except the Packers have a pro bowl WR and TE.

Offensively the Packers have just too many weapons and a machne at QB. 

Defensively, so far this season the Packers seem a bit off kilter.  They are getting sacks, but they are giving up huge amounts of yardage through the air.

Bears will need to win the TO battle to pull this one out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 23, 2011, 09:23:10 am
Bears will need to win the TO battle to pull this one out.

That was a huge difference between the Falcons win and the Saints loss that no one seems to be talking about.

The Falcons were playing us close until Urlacher picked off that Matt Ryan pass. And then of course the fumble returned for a TD.  But against the Saints?  Nada.  No turnovers, and a big-time deficit in time of possession.

I'm not saying that if our D had gotten a couple of turnovers we would have won the Saints game...  but we sure would have had a lot better chance.  Unless and until our O gets it together consistently, our D is going to have to be much more than just a "maintenance" defense if we're gonna prevail against some of these better teams early in the season. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on September 23, 2011, 10:22:01 am
They got a fumble recovery against the Saints - but then Cutler took the offense the wrong way running for his life...

I think Aikman said - "The only Bear unhappy about that turnover is Cutler"
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 23, 2011, 10:52:59 pm

 If i'm on DAA BEARRSSE defense ... I HATE DAA BEARRSSE OL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 24, 2011, 05:56:54 am
Interesting note from the trib today...

Extra points: Receiver Roy Williams (groin), running back Marion Barber (calf), guard Lance Louis (ankle) all practiced Friday and are questionable for Sunday. Barber could make his Bears debut, but there's some doubt about his status. … For the Packers, Clay Matthews (quad) and Charles Woodson (foot) are probable despite being sidelined in practice most of the week. … The Bears have spoken with Fox Sports regarding the network's coverage of the team. "(The) focus is on Green Bay now," Bears spokesman Scott Hagel said.

I was sick of Aikman critcizing Cutler at every turn, if you pay attention he is measured like no one else...

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on September 24, 2011, 10:18:09 am
So what is worse Joe Buck hating on the Bears or Joe Buck slurping on Rodgers.  I may just turn the volume all the way down.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 24, 2011, 10:29:13 am
Saints’ Harper: NFL admits error on Cutler hard-hit call

ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 22, 2011 1:08PM


Saints strong safety Roman Harper says the NFL has notified the team that game officials were wrong to throw a flag for Harper’s hard hit on Chicago quarterback Jay Cutler.

The flag flew moments after the quarterback threw an incomplete pass in the first half of New Orleans’ 30-13 victory over the Bears last Sunday. The call on third-and-6 extended what turned out to be Chicago’s lone touchdown drive of the game.

“When I saw the flag. I couldn’t believe it. Cutler went to begging for it and they gave it to him,” Harper said. “The bad thing is they got points off of it.”

Harper credited Saints coaches for telling him to forget about the flag and remain aggressive. The Saints continued to blitz relentlessly and wound up sacking Cutler six times, with Harper getting two sacks and a forced fumble.

“Pretty much as soon as the play was over, I think coach (Sean) Payton called timeout and really got after the ref,” Harper said. “The coaches were like, ‘Keep playing. Don’t worry about it. That was a (bad) call. Just keep balling and don’t worry about that.’”

Had no bearing, we lost. Those calls happen all the time. I thought it was questionable, but it's not like we haven't been on the wrong end of a call like that in the past..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 24, 2011, 10:35:05 am
I think the whole O stunk last week. I agree with Phil, not sure what game Dallas was watching, but Cutler was under pressure most of the game. Few more games like this past week and we'll be watching Hanie under center. Anyone still want to question Cutlers toughness? What the hell was Lovie thinking at the end of the game by leaving Cutler in, he had already took a severe beating..

Although, if he pulls Cut, does everyone start the "pouting" or "toughness" bullshit again..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 24, 2011, 10:56:13 am
No, it'd be Haney supporters saying how well he did against the Pack in the NFC championship game. ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 24, 2011, 12:01:26 pm
If we can keep Cutler upright, and get a few knocks on Rodgers, I think we have a good chance..

WE really can't have us being 1 and 2 with the pack being 3 and 0. And to have another loss to an nfc team, not to mention within our own division..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on September 24, 2011, 12:41:46 pm
It will be the third time this year the Pack will have beat the bears this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 24, 2011, 02:33:06 pm
Or not..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 24, 2011, 02:35:29 pm
This year Otto narrated "Honey Badger Don't Care" this year while wearing his mittens this year...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 24, 2011, 03:12:46 pm
I think the whole O stunk last week. I agree with Phil, not sure what game Dallas was watching, but Cutler was under pressure most of the game. Few more games like this past week and we'll be watching Hanie under center. Anyone still want to question Cutlers toughness? What the hell was Lovie thinking at the end of the game by leaving Cutler in, he had already took a severe beating..

Although, if he pulls Cut, does everyone start the "pouting" or "toughness" bull**** again..

Yes, he was under pressure no one disputes that (the previous week too).   I was disputing how the majority of the blame was being placed on the offensive line. 

I thought they got too much of the blame, blame that should have been shared by our WRs not getting open, our blitz protection, backup O-lineman filling in for starters,  our TE/HB blocking, Martz' schemes, our run/pass ratio in playcalling, and Cutler himself.

Guess you guys missed all that huh? 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 24, 2011, 06:29:26 pm
Nope, read my first line.. "The whole O stunk last week". I do agree, our receivers were awful. Knox wants the starting job, first you have to play like you deserve it..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on September 24, 2011, 07:14:06 pm
My game breakdown for Sunday.

QB - Clear Packer edge with Rodgers.
WR - Packers, not one Chicago WR would start for Pack.
RB - Even, forte is a WR threat more than a run one.
OL - Packers, big.
Offensive Scheme - Packers

DB - Packers, even missing Collins
LB - Packers, youth over age
DL - Packers, they will do more damage.

Coach - Packers.

Prediction - Pack 27-9.
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 24, 2011, 07:22:29 pm
What? Not 127-9?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 24, 2011, 07:25:28 pm
Nice glasses Homer... and that is an insult to Homer Simpson

They are deer skin mittens though...(http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w37/Grizzlybear34/Otto.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 24, 2011, 07:27:34 pm
and those also appear to be earmuffs, if I am not mistaken.  Ear "freakin'" muffs and mittens.  If it wasn't for the stubble, I'd say you are 6...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 24, 2011, 07:29:14 pm
I know.  They are "munk skin" muffs.  As in chipmunk.  Who dresses you?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 24, 2011, 08:44:54 pm
My game breakdown for Sunday.

QB - Clear Packer edge with Rodgers.
WR - Packers, not one Chicago WR would start for Pack.
RB - Even, forte is a WR threat more than a run one.
OL - Packers, big.
Offensive Scheme - Packers

DB - Packers, even missing Collins
LB - Packers, youth over age
DL - Packers, they will do more damage.

Coach - Packers.

Prediction - Pack 27-9.

Let's keep it real. 

No HB for the Pack could start for the Bears.  Forte was able to run on the Pack last season and hopefully Martz mixes some in tomorrow.  Packers will be loading up to stop him.

As for DL, I can't even name a Packer d-lineman other than Raji.   We run different schemes but I'd rate the Bears dlineman over the Pack with Peppers, Melton and Idonijie, and our depth.   I'd rate the LBing about even, Matthews is the best linebacker out there but Urlacher and Briggs are better than anything else GB has.  Again different schemes.

As for the score...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 25, 2011, 12:48:24 am
Let me help you.............. 28-23 Bears
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 25, 2011, 01:50:53 am

 BEARS 17

 G.B. 12
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 25, 2011, 05:11:36 am
Suprisingly to me, about a 50/50 split at the trib picking this game.  We need at least 2 turnovers and establish Forte.  Bears 24 -16
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on September 25, 2011, 11:10:32 pm
I think that I had a pretty good read on the score of the game. The Packers are just a better team right now.  
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 26, 2011, 12:07:16 am
This is a Jerry Angelo caused wasted year.....I would put it almost solely on his back....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 26, 2011, 06:24:12 am
Agreed Sporty
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 26, 2011, 08:15:16 am
The difference in both talent and coaching between the Bears and the top-tier teams was painfully obvious yesterday.

If I were the McCaskeys I would be offering a blank check to Ted Thompson to come down to Chicago and fix this mess.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest118 on September 26, 2011, 08:23:05 am
Has Mike Martz been fired yet? how do you go another game with this guy??? Seriously pathetic.

9 rushes?

And throwing to guys like Hester, Know, Williams who can't hang out to easy passes.

9 rushes????
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on September 26, 2011, 08:31:16 am
Ya could not run the ball. The bear line was not going to win the LOS over the Packers defense front. Begging martz to call more rushes is just giving plays away. Besides, forte is becoming a third down back. Meaning he is better suited to catching the ball out of the backfield instead of power running it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 26, 2011, 09:09:56 am
Ya could not run the ball. The bear line was not going to win the LOS over the Packers defense front. Begging martz to call more rushes is just giving plays away. Besides, forte is becoming a third down back. Meaning he is better suited to catching the ball out of the backfield instead of power running it.

Part of that I agree with. What I disagree with is that with a GM committed to putting a decent OLine out there Forte could be an excellent back, but that commitment isnt happening as long as Angelo is in charge.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 26, 2011, 09:31:24 am
Ya could not run the ball. The bear line was not going to win the LOS over the Packers defense front. Begging martz to call more rushes is just giving plays away. Besides, forte is becoming a third down back. Meaning he is better suited to catching the ball out of the backfield instead of power running it.

Have to agree with Wshful.  Forte was getting hit behind the line and often times had no chance.

He's not a power back by any means but he's big enough to play all 3 downs.  Ryan Grant got most of his yards when there were holes you could drive a truck through, but when he was one on one with a LB he was stopped dead in his tracks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 27, 2011, 12:26:43 pm
Nice glasses Homer... and that is an insult to Homer Simpson

They are deer skin mittens though...(http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w37/Grizzlybear34/Otto.jpg)

What a pair of.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 27, 2011, 12:27:54 pm
Do you think Jay Cutler wishes he had stayed in Denver?


http://www.suntimes.com/sports/7894232-419/do-you-think-jay-cutler-wishes-he-had-stayed-in-denver.html
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 27, 2011, 12:53:54 pm
Good article there from the Sun Times.

It includes this statement, which sums things up better than any of the several million other words that have already been written on the topic.

"Cutler isn’t failing the Bears. The Bears are failing Cutler."

Amen. That's telling it like it is and props to the Sun Times writer for finally coming out and saying what a lot of others have realized but won't say out loud.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on September 28, 2011, 05:55:13 am
He doesn't have anyone to block for him and he doesn't have anyone to throw to.  This is not Jay's fault.  About time it starts getting said in the press.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on September 28, 2011, 09:40:08 am

Cutler was equally at fault Sunday.  It was like the offensive line, receivers and Cutler were taking turns f***ing up.

The only guy that had a solid game was Forte and you wouldn't know it from his rushing stats.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 28, 2011, 09:47:29 am
Yeah it's pretty bad when the best thing you can say about your best offensive player was that he was the only one who didn't screw anything up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 28, 2011, 10:41:42 am
 How can Forte screw up with an 8 inch rushing avg.against Packers? This is on Martz.

 Stop playing Raiduhs vertical ball ... you dont have the talent nor have you tried to get it.

 You are what you drafted and signed in FA. Angelo you are 1-2.

 Two losses to the Pack in our house. Lovie seems like a spectator.

 The Roy Williams influence is shining thru ... now all WR's drop balls.

 Forte running against Caro ... should be the getgo from handoff one.

 Pound it ... maybe even Barber gets to play ... pound it.

 Caro is ranked 17th in defense ... lets send that to 32.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 28, 2011, 11:17:30 am
Barber and RoyBoy both need to step it up yesterday.  Between injuries and bad play they have both been worthless so far this season.

Both of those signings are making Angelo look very foolish right about now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 28, 2011, 11:32:17 am
Barber and RoyBoy both need to step it up yesterday.  Between injuries and bad play they have both been worthless so far this season.

Both of those signings are making Angelo look very foolish right about now.

 You noticed?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 28, 2011, 03:03:40 pm

 Who the fuuuuck????

 CHICAGO BEARS!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 28, 2011, 07:13:18 pm
Part of Cutlers problem is, he's gun shy, but who wouldn't be?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 28, 2011, 08:16:59 pm
Part of Cutlers problem is, he's gun shy, but who wouldn't be?

This one is so long drawn out it could never fit on one post.

 Where do we begin?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 29, 2011, 12:48:30 pm
If we can't get Cowher next year, I'd settle for this guy too:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/29/jeff-fisher-paying-close-attention-to-nfl-this-year/

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 29, 2011, 01:04:52 pm
I thought Lovie was signed through next year. I dont believe this is Lovie's last season, although I could be wrong. The McCaskets arent going to ace Lovie and pay him to sit at home next year
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on September 29, 2011, 01:29:32 pm
Bill Cowher is not coming out of retirement to coach the bears. First, you don't pay enough, secondly pigs don't fly. Now if you're thinking of Fisher you may have a possiblity...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 29, 2011, 02:45:47 pm
Lovie received a 2 yr contract extension this past February
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on September 29, 2011, 03:14:59 pm
I think it put all the coaches and Angelo on the same time frame as Philips.
Unsure about Ruskell.
I think the way the ownership/executive structure is, they are ok with status quo for now.
I don't think anyone is leaving unless they want to (except maybe Martz) unless we do less than .500 and we won't be less than .500 unless we have some injuries to key players (Forte, Cutler, Peppers, Urlacher, Briggs).

I expect  while they want to get back to a superbowl, as long as we are sniffing the playoffs they aren't going to make any major changes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 29, 2011, 03:35:07 pm
Ted Phillips has been an unmitigated disaster even though he has flown largely under the radar in the blame game.

If we go into the bye week at 1-6 (which is not impossible), Bears fans will be standing outside Halas Hall with pitchforks and torches.  Or at least they should be.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 29, 2011, 05:35:08 pm
Ted Phillips has been an unmitigated disaster even though he has flown largely under the radar in the blame game.

If we go into the bye week at 1-6 (which is not impossible), Bears fans will be standing outside Halas Hall with pitchforks and torches.  Or at least they should be.

You'd like to hope it'd be that way but the McCaskets dont work that way. They arent paying money for 2 coachees or 2 GMs. It would shock me if there was any change made during the season
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on September 29, 2011, 05:50:02 pm
You'd like to hope it'd be that way but the McCaskets dont work that way. They arent paying money for 2 coachees or 2 GMs. It would shock me if there was any change made during the season

 The McCaskys arent going to change anything ... they are looking at 11-5 with a chance to do it again 3 games into the season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on September 29, 2011, 07:47:06 pm
I like Fischer. He's about the right mentality for what this team needs and seems his Titans were always competitive,always in the mix.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 29, 2011, 08:35:51 pm
So do I like Fisher. But the bottom line is that Lovie was just re-upped for 2 years. The McCaskets arent going to pay Lovie for the remainder of his cotract and hire Fisher or anybody else.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 29, 2011, 09:54:23 pm
If this is posted elsewhere, sorry. I didn't know if this was the right thread.  Some points valid, some not IMO.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Bears-Hall-of-Famer-Hampton-refuses-White-House-?urn=nfl-wp8216
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on September 30, 2011, 06:18:51 am
To hear sports talk in Nashville, Fisher is not the Messiah.  He is not missed in any fashion.  Felt he was stubborn to a fault, behind the times with the offense, sounds alot like someone I hear about here...   Careful what you wish for.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 30, 2011, 08:14:34 am
I've always liked Danimal.  That dude is straight-up old school, through and through.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 30, 2011, 10:53:15 am
If we can't get Cowher next year, I'd settle for this guy too:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/29/jeff-fisher-paying-close-attention-to-nfl-this-year/



Oh hell no!!!  Why would anyone want him?  Lovie has done more than Fisher with his team but we want a downgrade at HC?  Come on.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 30, 2011, 11:05:55 am
"not a fan of the guy in the White House."


LOLOL!!! Hampton will tell ya like it is..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on September 30, 2011, 11:13:25 am
He doesn't have to be a fan of anyone in the White House but to snub being honored along with the 85 Chicago Bears is stupid on his part.  Keep your personal issues to yourself and join YOUR TEAM in being honored, an honored way long overdue, and not make this about you.

I'm sure there are MANY players that didn't like the past president but went to the White House anyway because their TEAM is being honored.  Dan is wrong in this case.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 30, 2011, 11:37:52 am
So why were the 85 Bears were never invited to the White House the first time?

Was that just not done back then or was it an intentional snub?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on September 30, 2011, 11:52:59 am
The space shuttle blew up so it was cancelled.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 30, 2011, 12:16:14 pm
Oh yeah.  Thanks Pekin.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 30, 2011, 12:22:19 pm
Hampton is NOT wrong. Do you think it's a coincidence that they are being invited now when Obama's poll numbers are tanking? Obama had nearly 3 years to invite them but didn't. Too busy? He sure didn't miss doing his NCAA basketball brackets show though. I don't blame Hampton for not wanting to be a prop in one of Obama's photo ops.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 30, 2011, 12:52:56 pm
One of the great lines from band of brothers "you salute the rank, not the person". He should go. Its the President of the United States of America.  Honor the office of the president. Salute the rank. If Jimmy Carter had invited me I'd have broken my neck to get there.  And I've said more than enough about my opinion of Jimmy Carter.  Go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 30, 2011, 01:01:45 pm
Hampton's a man with strong beliefs, he owes no one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 30, 2011, 01:05:35 pm
His wife is hot too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 30, 2011, 01:46:38 pm
I commend Hampton for his convictions. And why not invite the wives and kids too? Supposedly they were not invited. I think Hamp was justified for standing up for his convictions. One less player? No biggie. The best player cant make it. Walter has passed on.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on September 30, 2011, 02:13:50 pm
I'd be very surprised if the Fridge made it either.

Last I heard he's not in a good way.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on September 30, 2011, 02:26:53 pm
The whole thing just seems silly. Why didn't Bush or Clinton do it a long time ago and why now in the middle of the football season when former players like Rivera or Frazier are coaching their teams and can't make it even if they wanted to?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 30, 2011, 02:56:16 pm
Cause Obumma probably wont get that chance next year
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 30, 2011, 03:46:50 pm
Of course its a politcal stunt. So what. You get in the oval office, and get all that cool white house swag we paid for.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 30, 2011, 04:14:26 pm
I'm fine with Obama doing this. Heck, he's a Chicago sports fan. I don't really see it as a "political move". What exactly does he gain from it? Maybe the "I'm just another sports fan kinda guy" thing, but I don't see that winning an election..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on September 30, 2011, 04:16:12 pm
There is only one, and will always be only one coach.  Bless you Ditka. I can see you've mellowed a bit, but only just.

 http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/mike-ditka-wants-to-spit-on-author-of-walter-payton-biography-093011
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on September 30, 2011, 04:17:50 pm
Chifan its definitely political. Absolutely
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on September 30, 2011, 04:18:24 pm
Yep, go Ditka!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 01, 2011, 12:30:40 am
Of course its a politcal stunt. So what. You get in the oval office, and get all that cool white house swag we paid for.

Maybe I'm missing something but how is this "political"?  President Obama is giving probably the greatest team in NFL history the recognition they richly deserve and it's a "politcal stunt"?  I'm not following the logic here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 01, 2011, 02:13:05 am

 HEY ... FUUUUUUCK IT!

 Carolina @ SOLDIERS

 Look what Jacksonville did to Caro during a rain game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on October 01, 2011, 09:48:46 am
[[/quote]
There is only one, and will always be only one coach.  Bless you Ditka. I can see you've mellowed a bit, but only just.

 http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/mike-ditka-wants-to-spit-on-author-of-walter-payton-biography-093011

He would spit, right after he throws his gum at him.  Love it
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 01, 2011, 11:37:34 am
Phill - All those "visits" by all presidents are political stunts. Photo ops.  Fodder for the press corps. There is no reason for what is probably the person who, when it really comes right down to it, runs the planet, to see anyone.  Something for the polls.  I'd still go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 01, 2011, 04:06:00 pm
Photo ops and "fodder" for the press corps does nothing politically for the President.   Like I said for what I see he's doing something that should've been done period for the 1985 Bears so I don't see how that's going to help the President politically.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 01, 2011, 04:27:05 pm
Its going to make him look bad by not inviting the wives and kids rio which has been done in the past
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 01, 2011, 04:58:11 pm
Who is paying for all of the travel expenses? 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 01, 2011, 08:51:24 pm
Probably the taxpayers although I could be wrong. The airlines need a little stimulus money
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 03, 2011, 11:29:23 pm

 CAROLINA @ BEARS

 WE WIN!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on October 04, 2011, 11:29:30 am
Maybe I'm missing something but how is this "political"?  President Obama is giving probably the greatest team in NFL history the recognition they richly deserve and it's a "politcal stunt"?  I'm not following the logic here.

I hope that rebel McMahon wears a Bush tee shirt.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on October 04, 2011, 11:41:20 am
I hope mcnahon wears those geeky glasses so no one has to see his buggy eyes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 04, 2011, 12:27:12 pm
I hope that rebel McMahon wears a Bush tee shirt.

Guess you don't recall YOUR team gave a Packers jersey to YOUR PRESIDENT at the White House.  Hell the whole team shook hands with him.  Do you still love the Packers?  :)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 04, 2011, 04:35:04 pm
Dan Hampton declines WH invite

ESPNChicago.com
October 4, 2011, 3:37 PM ET


Former Chicago Bears great and Pro Football Hall of Famer Dan Hampton will not accompany the Bears' Super Bowl XX championship team to the White House on Friday, and not all of his former teammates agree with that decision.

The team wasn't honored after winning the Super Bowl on Jan. 26, 1986, because the space shuttle Challenger exploded two days later, killing everyone on board.

"Family can't go, I don't want to go, that's it," Hampton texted to ESPNChicago.com's Melissa Isaacson on Monday.

But Hampton, appearing on WSCR 670 in Chicago recently, said there was more to his decision.

"It's my own personal choice," Hampton said. "I don't choose to go. No family, no kids. Honey's going to the White House, and you tell your kids and your wife, 'Oh, I'm sorry. You're not invited.'

"Secondly, I'm not a fan of the guy in the White House. And third, it was 25 years ago. Let it go."

Hampton's friend and former teammate Steve McMichael did not agree with the decision.

"They said, 'Are you going?' Because there are a couple of my teammates that aren't going to make the trip," McMichael told ESPNChicago.com's Jeff Dickerson. "But let me tell you something, I don't care who the president is. I don't care what's going on in the government, if I'm against a war or what. If you are somebody that the White House wants to honor, and you're a citizen of this country, it behooves you to show up and look at it like an honor and a privilege.

"I told them I'm going to have bells on."

McMichael wondered whether he may have played a role in President Barack Obama -- who's from Chicago -- making the decision to honor the '85 Bears.

"This wouldn't happen unless it was a president from Chicago who's a Chicago Bears fan," McMichael said. "I brought this up to some of his aides last year. They were around town at some of the charity events I did, and I brought this up to them: 'You know it's going to be the 25th anniversary of our Super Bowl team. We didn't get to go because the space shuttle blew up. Mention it to him.'

"I wonder if that's what turned the wheel."
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 04, 2011, 04:50:18 pm
Wait, I think the Bears just wasted another timeout

Steve Rosenbloom/chicagotribune.com
9:05 a.m. CDT, October 4, 2011


I think I know why the Chicago Bears blow so many timeouts on offense:

Jay Cutler has to get the play from the guy on the sideline, but first, the guy on the sideline has to get it from Mike Martz in the booth, but before that, Martz has to get it from Mike Tice.

The game plan against Carolina on Sunday sure seemed like a Tice production. Run here, run there, run Matt Forte everywhere. Looked a lot like last season after the bye when Martz seemingly was ordered to stop being Martz.

Either that, or Martz had a spasm of lucidity: Let your most productive player produce.

Cutler should be the Bears’ most productive player, of course. They’re paying him like it. They paid for him like it. This is a quarterback’s league. But he’s all dressed up with no place to throw.

Until the Bears get an offensive line that pass-blocks reliably and until someone tells them what an actual receiver looks like, Cutler will be Rex Grossman or Kyle Orton or dead.

It’s an embarrassment from Ted Phillips on down to Jerry Angelo to Lovie Smith to Martz. Spend all that on a quarterback and then utterly and completely fail to get people to protect or play catch with him, all of which is made worse by a crazy coordinator who regularly refuses to put his players in a position to succeed. Which means the head coach has failed for the same reason. Which means the general manager has failed. Which means . . .

Which means Forte is the answer for now. And that raises another question: If Forte is the Bears’ most productive player and it was finally recognized and he was used as such, then why is Martz still around?

He doesn’t like running plays. It’s like doing homework or taking cough medicine. That game plan isn’t what he does or likes. That creates the likelihood that he will revert to his I’m-so-tricky-watch-this-pass-play DNA, and he’ll do it at the worst time just because that’s who he is.

On the off-chance that Martz was calling his own plays Sunday, he should’ve been sent to his room without dessert for that quarterback draw on the first drive.

It was third-and-goal from the Panthers’ 4, Forte had run crazy to get the Bears down there, and he called Cutler’s number. Not Forte’s. Not play-action. Not even Marion Barber, who was brought in for those kinds of battering runs.

No, Martz called the most-sacked-quarterback on a designed run on a 14-yard field. Why Martz wasn’t fired before the next commercial, I have no idea. I mean, does this guy have a bonus clause for quarterback hits?

And what was with the pass plays late in the game when sane people would try to run out the clock?

The Bears were up 27-23 with less than four minutes to go, Forte had just run for 20 yards and again for 4, and then Martz called two pass plays. The Bears had a quarterback playing like Bad Rex, they needed to run the clock to escape with a lucky win, and the interim offensive coordinator called two pass plays. Did the Panthers look like a team you had to trick?

And now the Bears get one of the two remaining unbeaten teams in the NFL. They’ve already lost to one of those teams, the Packers, and now they get the Lions, who are 4-0 because Matthew Stafford hasn’t suffered his annual season-ending injury.

The Lions mounted a record comeback from another 20-point-plus deficit, getting two touchdowns from Calvin Johnson and two on interception returns. Good reasons right there not to throw the ball and not to let Detroit on the field to throw it, either.

What’s more, when you include the 113 rushing yards the Cowboys picked up, the Bears have all the reasons they need to stick the ball in Forte’s gut behind a fullback lead again to stabilize an unstable offense.

But say this for the Bears: They aren’t leaving any timeouts on the field.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on October 04, 2011, 06:38:07 pm
Guess you don't recall YOUR team gave a Packers jersey to YOUR PRESIDENT at the White House.  Hell the whole team shook hands with him.  Do you still love the Packers?  :)

I have no idea what your point is here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 04, 2011, 06:52:04 pm
Well don't know what point you were trying to make either.

That makes us even.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 04, 2011, 07:30:10 pm
http://www.chicagobears.com/multimedia/multimediapopup.asp?mm_file_id=2592&play_clip=Y&rn=18

Culter miked up for the last game.  He sure doesn't seem as disinterested in the game as the media makes him out to be.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on October 04, 2011, 09:15:28 pm
Ya sure, but one has to find out which game that is.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 04, 2011, 09:31:13 pm
It was last week against the Panthers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on October 05, 2011, 06:11:16 am
I think McMahon wearing a Bush t-shirt to the White House would be akin to McMahon wearing a Bears jersey when the Packers won?  If I recall correctly...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on October 05, 2011, 06:58:11 pm
Correct, Griz.  You got the point that Phill missed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 05, 2011, 07:21:38 pm

 Do we get the one-two at Deeeetroit with Barber?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 05, 2011, 11:23:21 pm

 Actually Deeeetroit doesnt have jack shiiit against us ...

 you could never have Motown without CHICAGO BLUES.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUFCZHWK89k (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUFCZHWK89k)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on October 07, 2011, 10:36:45 pm
Dont recall seeing any evidence of this at all:

Bears defensive end Corey Wootton, who played his first game of the season last week following preseason knee surgery, was held out of Thursday's practice with a hand injury.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on October 08, 2011, 08:03:18 am
For whatever reason,this happens alot with Lovie's crew. No report of injuries and then all of a sudden someone pops up on the injury list and is out the next week. We look at the game,the guy looks fine,played fine...then he's gone the next week.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 10, 2011, 08:04:26 am
And now we see why Wootton fell as far down the draft board as he did. Dude can't stay healthy for jack.

He's looking like a lost cause.  If not for that knockout hit on Favre last season (which was a huge play to be sure), his net contribution to the team so far in his career would be zero. Hard to call a 4th round draft pick a bust but I've gotta be wondering at this point if that pick couldn't have been better spent elsewhere.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on October 10, 2011, 08:37:52 am
Quote
http://www.chicagobears.com/multimedia/multimediapopup.asp?mm_file_id=2592&play_clip=Y&rn=18

Culter miked up for the last game.  He sure doesn't seem as disinterested in the game as the media makes him out to be.

Hopefully Cutler is not predicting his future in the end of that clip when he is telling Hane, "You took a litte break there big guy.  We'll use you later on."

oops...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 10, 2011, 08:42:29 am
I'm going to book a flight to stonehenge. I'm sure somewhere amongst the ruins is the reason for this:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-free-agent-wr-tweets-hes-headed-to-bears-20111009,0,4087922.story
The only pro photo the trib could post is the clown not catching the ball?  Hell, the Bears ALREADY have WR's that can do that.  Don't the Bears need WR's NOW? Instead they dredge up this off the IR? IR?!!!  Has someone check the air quality at Halas? Water? It's gotta be something.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on October 10, 2011, 09:03:40 am
Can never have enough under 6 foot average speed receivers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on October 10, 2011, 09:53:48 am
How can I get a job on the Fines comittee?

What a JOKE

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-1010-bears-brite--20111010,0,5545166.story

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 10, 2011, 10:35:56 am
The Bears are talking big that they need a win tonight. Where was this sense of urgency before? With the Pack at 5-0 I dont visualize any way the Bears catch GB. I seriously believe if the Bears believe they are SB contenders and an NFL NFC elite team they better begin playing like one. And that starts tonight. You cant even get a wild card with the Lions undefeated too
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 10, 2011, 10:56:07 am
The Bears looked like an NFL elite team the first weekend of the season against the Falcons.

Since then, they don't look like they can even go .500 this year.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 10, 2011, 11:48:20 am

Heard the same thing last year.  Still early. 

Offense doesn't have the depth to cover for Bennett and Carimi while they're out.  And they need to work Roy Williams more into the offense.

Defensively, safeties making way too many mistakes.  Defensive line needs to step up the play.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on October 10, 2011, 12:01:45 pm
GO BEARS.

BEAT THE LIONS!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 10, 2011, 12:08:49 pm
The bottom line for the Bears is that too many people are screwing up too often, every game.  That applies to both players and coaches.

That's pretty typical of the Bears under the entire Angelo/Lovie tenure, though.

What's different this year from last is we have had injuries to multiple key players, early in the season... and thanks to Angelo's terrible drafting, we have zero depth at every position except DL and that's really starting to be exposed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on October 10, 2011, 02:35:39 pm
Just for the record, I picked the bears to be 7-9 and in third place in the Central.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 10, 2011, 03:56:15 pm

Oh goodee.  Let me jot that down.

Or does anybody really give a damn?

I thought not.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on October 10, 2011, 05:07:19 pm
What I would like to see starting in tonights game and hopefully the rest of the year...is more Marion Barber.  I am not saying Forte is the MAN because he is...but the physical punishing run style of Barber is much needed in the Bears offense.  If you can crash threw a broken OLine for 3-4 yards on 1st or 2nd down it really helps a bad offense out.

I personal believe a hard running Barber makes it easier for the WR as well.  When you have a bowling ball type back breaking tackles, the S and CB's are always spying the run looking to help out on second level tackling.  That split second of spying gives a big advantage to a WR. 

I really, really hope they work some Marion in early at least to try and soften up the Detroit D a little.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 10, 2011, 05:30:35 pm
No doubt, it's time for both of our big-name Cowboy acquisitions (Roy and Barber) to start earning their keep.

If they don't start doing what we brought them in here to do -- consistently and real damn soon -- it's not gonna matter cause we'll be three games back in the division and our season will effectively be over.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 10, 2011, 07:17:15 pm
what he said
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 12, 2011, 01:14:10 pm
You know what I've noticed just recently?

The names "Matt Millen" and "Jerry Angelo" are showing up next to each other more and more in the media.

That's funny...  and sad at the same time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on October 12, 2011, 02:00:18 pm
We won't finish bad enough for Matt Kalil, but could we possibly suck enough to get Riley Reiff?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 12, 2011, 02:38:10 pm
Those names are not familiar...  guess it's time to start watching some college ball. 

 :-\
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 12, 2011, 02:59:07 pm
Toeneia (sp?) out. sprained knee.  the desent continues up to maximum velocity.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 12, 2011, 03:31:56 pm
Toeaina...  arguably our best interior D-Lineman and most certainly the best against the run.

Looks like it's shaping up for a monster game for Adrian Peterson.  He and Jared Allen are all the Vikings might need to beat us even if the rest of their team doesn't show up.

We had better pray for a monsoon Sunday night cause I think a slow and muddy Soldier Field is the only way we have a chance as dinged-up as we are right now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on October 12, 2011, 04:59:23 pm
Kalil is LT for USC, protecting Barkley...he's projected top 5

Reiff is Iowa's LT...he's a top 10-15 guy
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on October 12, 2011, 05:15:29 pm
Draft either. We need a real LT. 3 OL is what we need this next draft,top 3 picks,then a reciever and a safety or LB. We've gone far too long not getting good quality help on that line. Time for that to change!! We could root out a quality FA reciever too. Is it that hard to figure this **** out? I'm no friggin GM and have more brains than Angelo....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 12, 2011, 05:36:26 pm
Bears need help at: OL, Safety, WR, LB, DE, DT, CB and well let's just say it would be easier to say what they don't need.

A QB and a RB.  Well they may need a RB if Angelo is too fucccking stupid to pay Forte.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 12, 2011, 08:06:06 pm
Atta boy Peke
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 13, 2011, 02:05:06 am

 Under the circumstances ... this is the best I can do.

 LT Carimi

 LG OPEN

 C Spencer

 RG Garza

 RT Webb
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 13, 2011, 02:10:07 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAPgDs30eq8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAPgDs30eq8)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 13, 2011, 02:32:04 am

 So whats the deal? We have to go to London and jam with Fleetwood Mac?

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzeO7oP9QgU&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzeO7oP9QgU&feature=related)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on October 13, 2011, 08:12:24 am
Was thinking this morning with Toeiana out, there is absolutely no reason to NOT see what our 2nd round pick Paea can do.  Just hope he doesnt blow like he did in preseason. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 13, 2011, 09:26:02 am
Wootton and Toeiana out, possibly Peppers...

I guess keeping 10 D-Linemen now isn't as insane as it seemed at the time but I seriously question whether some of these guys are good enough to step it up.

Okoye and Melton looked great against the Falcons but have pretty much disappeared since.  Anthony Adams has shown no indication he was worth re-signing.  That's about it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 13, 2011, 10:14:01 am
Say hello to Angelo's successor...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/13/no-tim-ruskell-first-round-picks-remain-in-seattle/

 :-[
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 13, 2011, 10:33:14 am
Bears have played arguably the top 3 teams in the league the last 4 weeks (Saints, Packers and Lions).  And the 4th team they played in that time span (the Panthers) gave the Packers and Saints everything they could handle.

Bears need to get Carimi and Bennett back ASAP.   Omiyale should be able to hold on another week with a home game this Sunday - he has been exposed on turf in hostile domes.  If he fails again this weekend I think the Bears might seriously have to look at bringing up Levi Horn.

Defensively, Chris Harris had a dreadful game, reminiscent of what he looked like in preseason last year.   Safety position has killed us this year and if it continues Bears may have to look at Conte in the mix.   We are seeing why the Pack leaped over us to get to Morgan Burnett - Major Wright is struggling.

Looking forward to seeing what Paea can bring.  DTs have been pretty invisible most of the year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on October 13, 2011, 10:36:14 am
Bears QB Cutler calls for change
 
By ANDREW SELIGMAN
AP Sports Writer
2:15 p.m. CDT, October 12, 2011

LAKE FOREST, Ill.— Jay Cutler is calling for change.

The Chicago Bears' quarterback said it is getting more difficult to maintain faith in the system with the offense struggling and the hits on him piling up along with the losses. Cutler was running for cover again in Monday's 24-13 loss at Detroit, and he sounds like a man who might be running out of patience.

He said "yeah" when asked Wednesday if it was tough to stay confident in the offense run by coordinator Mike Martz.

"It's like anything," Cutler added. "When it's not going well, that's the time when people start giving you a hard time and people start lacking in belief. But through the hard times we have to believe more and we've got to really work on it and make it happen."

What's happening so far isn't good.

The Bears have issues on both sides of the ball, and at 2-3, they're in danger of falling out of contention in the NFC North after winning the division last year. They already trail Detroit and Green Bay -- the league's last unbeaten teams -- by three games, and they figure to have their hands full with Minnesota on Sunday.

Cutler has been sacked 18 times this season, tied with Sam Bradford and Tarvaris Jackson for the most in the NFL. With Vikings' stars Jared Allen and Brian Robison staring at an offensive line that ranks 30th, it could be a long night for Chicago's quarterback if no adjustments are made.

One change he'd like to see? Less time with the ball in his hands. Cutler said the Bears must find ways for him to get rid of it quicker and cut back on the hits he's taking.

"(I'm) just believing in the system, knowing that Mike is going to come up with some game plans to get rid of the ball quicker and help out the offensive line and get us back on track," Cutler said.

Did Martz tell him he would?

"I said I'm hoping," Cutler said. "I'd like to see that happen."

That will be up to Martz. Or maybe coach Lovie Smith.

Martz has been in the spotlight ever since he was hired as the Bears' offensive coordinator before last season. To many, the architect of the Greatest Show on Turf was an odd fit, given Smith's preference to run.

At times, it seems that Martz is trying to force his system on a team that might not be best suited for it, particularly given the ongoing issues with the blocking. That was the perception last season, when the Bears struggled early on before committing more to the run and turning around their season, and a similar pattern has unfolded this year.

Some weeks, the running game has been an afterthought while Cutler is getting hammered. Other times, the pass protection is good enough, but the run blocking isn't.

They've had trouble getting the plays called in time, too, forcing them to burn timeouts.

Against Detroit, Cutler was under siege again.

He threw for 249 yards while completing 28 of 38 passes and got sacked three times but was dodging the defense all night. He would have gone down more had he not made some plays on the run, but Cutler said moving the pocket really isn't an option in this system. Rollouts simply aren't part of the package.

"Believe it or not, we're trying to put our guys in a position to succeed every play," Smith said.

The nine false starts at a raucous Ford Field certainly didn't help, and for the second straight game, starting right tackle Frank Omiyale got lifted.

"The fact that we're doing it to ourselves is something that we've talked about," center Roberto Garza said. "Unfortunately, we're not carrying what we're doing on the practice field to the game."

Cutler insists he's confident the line will bounce back.

"We have to get it right," he said. "And we've got to help them. That's part of it. We can't just expect everything to be OK and those guys just strap it up this week and be perfectly good. We've got to do our part and I've got to do my part and Mike Martz has to do his part and get rid of the ball and helping those guys out and protection and chipping and doing everything you have to do to avoid sacks and avoid pressure."

Notes: GM Jerry Angelo told the team's website that discipline -- not age -- is to blame for the defense's struggles. That group ranks 29th overall and continues to give up big plays. "We're giving up way too many big plays, and those big plays are coming because of poor fundamental thinking and/or execution of basic techniques," Angelo said. "That's where the real frustration comes in. I don't look at it as we're too old. We're too experienced to be making those mistakes."
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 13, 2011, 10:47:45 am
Omiyale should be able to hold on another week with a home game this Sunday - he has been exposed on turf in hostile domes. 

OMG has been benched twice in the 2nd half of consecutive games for bad play. To me that's grounds for permanent removal from the starting lineup unless our health situation makes that absolutely impossible. I read somewhere that OMG has been benched for Sunday night and that Lance Louis will start at RT which presumably means Spencer will play RG and also sets up what should be a very entertaining matchup between a RT and and a LDE (Brian Robison) with mile wide mean streaks.

As for Cutler, I'm glad to see him coming out and saying what needs to be said.  Cutler's man-sized effort Monday night has finally earned him some long overdue respect and it's great to see him finally getting a reasonable sympathetic audience.  Sharp criticism of Angelo, Martz and Lovie has also been WAY overdue and to Cutler I say "give em hell" and same for the national media.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 13, 2011, 10:58:14 am
No way should Omiyale get on the field ever again.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 13, 2011, 11:00:42 am
If you really want to get sick, dig up the salary numbers and find out how much money we've paid Omiyale in exchange for the some of the worst OL play I have seen in 35 years of watching pro football.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on October 13, 2011, 11:25:40 am
bad thing, this isn't the first time the pr-ick has su-cked a$$!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on October 13, 2011, 11:42:04 am
Frank OMGawdImAWFUL is another Q Mitchell- held onto for no other reason that the "braintrust" didn't get any real NFL Oline talent in to remove him. Like Ditka said in pre-season a few years ago live "the Kid can't play". The same applies to this stiff....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 13, 2011, 12:04:30 pm
The thing I can't get past with Omiyale is, he was touted as being this amazing athlete at the OL position, yet his reflexes and footwork are some of the worst I've ever seen. A good speed rushing DE has a step on him before he's even out of his stance more often than not.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on October 13, 2011, 12:39:00 pm
It's really inexcusable that he's still playing. He has shown time and time and time AND time again that he does NOT belong on a NFL playing field. ANYONE on the ps has got to be better than him. They sure as heck fire can't be worse!! A young guy with any talent at all should show this guy the door easily....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 13, 2011, 12:41:44 pm
Fear not fellow Bear fans, according to the trib, our esteemed HC is "hinting" at "lineup changes".  Better do a hell of alot more than hint.  That ol play monday night could have been performed by dead guys. Really. Just lay'em down. That's what happended anyway. If you move forward call a timeout and get a crew to move'im up. Didn't happen much more than three times a half on monday, that wouldn't change.  Look at the advantages.  No false starts, right? There dead. they ain't gonna move. They can't move out of the dl's way like I saw some monday night, and the guy might trip over them. And, and ( a big seller to the owners) they don't get paid. There dead. I'm for it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on October 13, 2011, 12:47:50 pm
Got a point,46....a dead guy would have at least been in the way of Suh on that 1 yard run whereas the live ones moved out of his way.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on October 13, 2011, 12:52:39 pm
Rosenthal’s take: This is Jared Allen’s chance to let America know about his incredible season. Forget breaking the single-season sack record by the end of the year. Allen could break it during this game.

Rosenthal’s pick: Vikings 24, Bears 21.


Sad, but could happen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 13, 2011, 01:04:50 pm
Based on the utter ineptitude put on display by both the Bears O and D a few nights ago, I am very comfortable predicting a Vikings win Sunday night.

Our OL will, again, get nothing done against another top-tier DL. I think it is entirely possible that at least one of the Vikings DEs has a 3-sack game on his own.

Our defense, with the safeties a total disaster and down our two best D-Linemen (Peppers and Toeiana), will get gashed wide open by Adrian Peterson.

Vikings 27, Bears 13 in a game that's close at halftime but the Vikings own in the 2nd half.  Scoring even 20 points is a pipe dream for our offense, and our D is no longer able to cover for that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 13, 2011, 01:06:06 pm
20-16 Bears
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 13, 2011, 01:50:28 pm

Even with Allen, Williams and Robison the Bears O-line should be able to hold their own at home as long as the Bears DEFENSE keeps us in the game.   Bears O-line really gets in trouble in obvious passing situations especially when they get behind in the score.

If the defense can keep McNabb and Petersen in check, Bears offense can become more balanced and keep the dogs off Cutler.   One of the few bright spots of late is the Bears' run blocking - they'll get a good test against a Minnesota defense that has always been tough to run on.

As for the O-line, not sure what Lovie will do.  I think he'll give Omiyale another shot at RT and keep Louis at his best position inside.   I thought Louis did a pretty decent job against Sue last weekend.   The 4th and 1 failure was not Louis' fault.

Omiyale played the LT spot for most of last year and was never this inconsistent.   Unfortunately, they just don't have a lot of options right now with Carimi out.  At this point they might as well let Carimi (and Bennett) sit out against the Bucs too and get 3 weeks off.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 13, 2011, 02:01:21 pm
they need to stop all the penalties.
Starting off on 1st and 15 etc doesn't help us any.
Honestly holding isn't too bad of a penalty if Cutler is about to get creamed.

1st and 20 after a holding penalty is better than 2nd and 20 after a sack.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 13, 2011, 02:13:43 pm

Good point...assuming of course you are within arms reach of the defender.

I can't remember but do the Bears ever line up their tackles in that standing/squatting stance with one leg back like so many teams do?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 13, 2011, 02:18:14 pm
Hmmmmm..............

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-to-bench-safeties-harris-meriweather-20111013,0,1217010.story

well...ok I guess.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 13, 2011, 02:28:41 pm
At this point they might as well let Carimi (and Bennett) sit out against the Bucs too and get 3 weeks off.

And if we're 2-5 at that point, we might as well IR both of them cause the season's over at that point for us anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 13, 2011, 02:31:07 pm
Hmmmmm..............

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-to-bench-safeties-harris-meriweather-20111013,0,1217010.story

well...ok I guess.


This story should infuriate all of us.  ALL those draft picks we've spent on safeties and we still don't even have one of them (much less a pair) that we can put on the field with any confidence they'll do their jobs. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 13, 2011, 04:18:22 pm

I guess Lovie felt like he had to do SOMETHING...you know send a message to the D.

Chris Harris was dreadful Monday night but he had been out for 3 weeks and had only played in one game before that.   Yes, he was at fault for the Megatron TD but Tillman looked like he missed the jam and let the receiver run full speed down the field.  I don't think he deserved to benched for having ONE bad game.

As for Conte, I'd like to see more of him.  Not sure that I'd throw him in the starting lineup just yet.   But he does have more speed than the others...maybe he might be able to touch the ball.  Something our safeties haven't done much at all this season.

Actually, I'll think we'll see all 4 safeties throughout the evening.  But right now its Conte and Wright.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 13, 2011, 04:34:11 pm
I'm just thinking of Mike Brown in his prime right now.

Sigh...  seems so long ago.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on October 13, 2011, 05:06:19 pm
HAD to mention Brownie,didn't ya Yapp.......
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 13, 2011, 06:05:54 pm

 The pisser is ... this is the pisser.  Here we go again :

 
Where did the 1985 BEARS OL come from?

1983 : DRAFT

MARK BORTZ

TOM THAYER

JIMBO COVERT ...  thats ... 3 in a draft.

KEITH VAN HORNE was drafted #1 in 1981

JAY HILGENBERG was undrafted in 1981

 Sombody at HALLAS HALL should take note of the ... the ... the ... PAST!

 It fuuuucking worked. Really, nothings changed since then.

 Same old game.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on October 14, 2011, 06:44:18 am
Brandon Lloyd is on the block...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 14, 2011, 08:12:52 am
Do this deal, Angelo you dipsh-it.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/13/broncos-puts-brandon-lloyd-on-the-trading-block/

It should have been done already.

Another article is saying the Broncos are asking for only a 3rd round pick and may go as low as a 5th. Seriously Jerry, what's the holdup?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 14, 2011, 08:24:38 am
you mean we should trade a draft pick for a guy we cut because he couldn't stay healthy?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 14, 2011, 08:36:45 am
I know we had Lloyd before and he didn't work out, but he would be a miles better WR than any of the stiffs we currently have on the roster.

But I'm sure Angelo and Lovie "like the guys we've got". 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 14, 2011, 09:48:13 am

Brandon Lloyd was productive with the Bears as he was with the Broncos.  I think the coaches questioned his eagerness to get back on the field after an injury. 

Didn't he play for Turner at Illinois too?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on October 14, 2011, 10:44:18 am
I liked Mike Brown, but...  He was always hurt, and the one vivid memory I have of him is the playoff game the Eagles kicked our ass. I can still picture Brown coming off the field dazed and confused and his helmet cocked to the side...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 14, 2011, 11:02:32 am
I've always felt like it was a tragedy that Mike Brown didn't have Danieal Manning's body.

That would have been a player to be reckoned with.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 14, 2011, 03:41:46 pm
I dont care if Lloyd didnt cost us a UFA I still dont want the guy. He bad!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on October 15, 2011, 09:11:10 am
The '83 draft was a once and never again draft- the NFL could choose from the former USFL players as well as the college kids at the time. There will never be a draft like that one again......
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on October 17, 2011, 08:32:39 am
27-13 Vikings?

Really?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on October 17, 2011, 10:10:00 am
Had to been otters prediction right?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 17, 2011, 10:11:11 am
I thought it was Yapper's prediction.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on October 17, 2011, 10:14:51 am
Based on the utter ineptitude put on display by both the Bears O and D a few nights ago, I am very comfortable predicting a Vikings win Sunday night.

Our OL will, again, get nothing done against another top-tier DL. I think it is entirely possible that at least one of the Vikings DEs has a 3-sack game on his own.

Our defense, with the safeties a total disaster and down our two best D-Linemen (Peppers and Toeiana), will get gashed wide open by Adrian Peterson.

Vikings 27, Bears 13 in a game that's close at halftime but the Vikings own in the 2nd half.  Scoring even 20 points is a pipe dream for our offense, and our D is no longer able to cover for that.

Ok.  It was yapper's prophetic post.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on October 17, 2011, 11:16:35 am
For next Sunday.

Packers 34
Vikings 13

Tampa Bay 27
bears 16
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 17, 2011, 11:27:49 am
Bears telling Chris Harris to go look for a trade. Talk about writing on the wall.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 17, 2011, 01:41:11 pm
I'd rather see Merriwether go, Harris was good last year and in game one.
I expect last game he just wasn't healthy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on October 17, 2011, 01:52:49 pm
Cutler looked like a different person near the end of the game.  Good protection and his good play showed a guy with real emotion and a happy spirit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 17, 2011, 03:36:06 pm

From what I've read Harris ask the Bears for permission to seek a trade and Bears are obliging.

Some are saying that the Bears are making a knee-jerk reaction but I think Harris is too.  Harris is not 100% and was messing up on plays against the Lions that we didn't see him mess up on in 2010. 

Bears are letting Harris heal up and at the same time letting the 2 youngsters get some reps.

Harris can help the Bears THIS season and everyone just needs to relax. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 17, 2011, 03:45:42 pm
The trade deadline is tomorrow.  I doubt he gets traded but it is his last year on his contract so maybe. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on October 17, 2011, 05:22:04 pm
I agree with Dallas, everyone just needs to take deep breaths.  We probably will need him some point this season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 17, 2011, 08:30:57 pm
keep Harris and dump Merri-bum.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on October 18, 2011, 04:30:51 am
They have both sucked this season.

Article I read, Harris wanted to retire a Bear, Bears not interested..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 18, 2011, 07:37:58 am
maybe Harris requested the trade and out of respect they told him to go shop.
He was pretty good last year but hasn't really played well but one game this year.
I expect he won't get an offer.
I would want to hang on to him this year at least because after Wright and Conte we have nothing and we don't really know that much about Wright or Conte.

I think we can end the Merriwether experiment. He is a headhunter with no discipline, we can't have that in our D.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 18, 2011, 11:08:26 am
What GM in his right mind would offer us ANYTHING for Chris Harris?

OTOH, who woulda thought Carson Palmer was still worth a 1st round pick and possibly two?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 18, 2011, 11:26:00 am
I think they would be better off offering a 3rd or 4th for Orton.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 18, 2011, 11:39:26 am
maybe Harris requested the trade and out of respect they told him to go shop.
He was pretty good last year but hasn't really played well but one game this year.
I expect he won't get an offer.
I would want to hang on to him this year at least because after Wright and Conte we have nothing and we don't really know that much about Wright or Conte.

I think we can end the Merriwether experiment. He is a headhunter with no discipline, we can't have that in our D.


Somehow I have a feeling we'll be drafting yet another safety next April...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 18, 2011, 12:39:10 pm
Not very high if Wright and Conte look like the starting safeties of the future as they get more and more experience.  Time will tell on that one though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 18, 2011, 04:12:37 pm

He was pretty good last year but hasn't really played well but one game this year.

He has only played two games this year.  He started the opener against the Falcons and I don't recall any complaints.

He sat out the next 3 games and played horribly against the Lions.  So after one bad game where he probably came back to early from a hammy he's trash?

The guy needs to stop tweeting, get healthy, and wait for his next opportunity.  We have 10 more games and its not like Conte and Wright have brought back memories of Fencik and Duerson.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 18, 2011, 04:21:47 pm
Not very high if Wright and Conte look like the starting safeties of the future as they get more and more experience.  Time will tell on that one though.

A team needs at least one solid backup at S, plus two decent starters.  Right now I'm not even sure we have the two decent starters, much less a good backup. That's why I said we may be drafting another S.

Our S situation reminds me a lot of the OL...  no bonafide great players but just some players who suck less than others and you never know from game to game who those guys are gonna be.  Also, very little depth and an alarmingly high rate of mental mistakes so far into the season.  It feels like Rod Hoke is doing much the same thing Tice is doing...  moving pieces in and out trying to find some combination that works, and then praying if we do find a good starting tandem, that they both stay healthy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on October 18, 2011, 04:25:18 pm
I don't mind drafting another safety as long as it's not in the first round and Angelo and Ruskie his reliable sidekick buddy aren't the ones drafting....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 18, 2011, 04:26:32 pm
Barring some sort of package deal to trade up, we'll have two 3rd rounders in 2012...  ours, and the one we got for Olsen.

I could easily see one of those going for a S.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on October 18, 2011, 04:27:17 pm
Bears need to do what the Cubs did in stealing that guy from the Red Sox that built them up and go get Ted Thompson from Green Bay,pay him whatever he asks and put him in charge of draft day.......
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 18, 2011, 04:36:18 pm
Agreed, Ted Thompson is the best personnel guy working in the NFL today and it's not even close.

Even more impressively, compared to a guy like Mayhew with the Lions, Thompson has been doing it with draft picks that are in the middle to the bottom of each round for the last several years. And with guys who weren't even drafted at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 18, 2011, 04:43:10 pm
can you even go after a guy like Ted Thompson who is under contract without violating some rules?
I know it is ok to ask permission if there is some kind of promotion involved.
GB wouldn't let us even interview him like TB did for Marinelli a few years ago.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 18, 2011, 04:57:36 pm
I don't know about the league rules, but the Ted Thompson thing is a pipe dream for any number of reasons.

#1, the McCaskeys would never front the money it would take to get him, and would never be able to swallow their pride enough to hire a GM away from a division rival.

#2, Thompson would never agree to work under Ted Phillips, and Phillips isn't going anywhere.

#3, Thompson has a legit chance to collect 2 or 3 more Superbowl rings with the Packers in the next several years (barring a catastrophic concussion to Rodgers or something like that)...  which would cement his reputation as one of the NFL front office greats right up there with Bobby Beathard and the guys that put those Steelers, Cowboys and Niners dynasties together.  Unless he's one of those guys that thrives on taking on rebuilding challenges I don't see any reason he'd leave the gig he's got in GB right now, for any amount of coin.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on October 18, 2011, 08:21:20 pm
The Packers just hit on one guy after another and after awhile it's not luck any more.  They absolutely know what they are doing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 18, 2011, 11:12:28 pm

 "In the 2009 offseason, Ted Thompson continued to uphold his philosophy to build through the draft, selecting DT B.J. Raji with the 9th overall pick. and then trading up to select OLB Clay Matthews with the 26th overall pick."

 If only anybody at Halas Hall had this philosophy to build an OL.  :P  ::)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 19, 2011, 08:01:02 am
I'm just glad their D isn't playing great so far. They are playing good enough but not as well as last year.

I think the 3-4 is easier to find playmakers for that D if you have the right guy calling the plays.
On O, Rogers makes a big difference. Their OL is pretty beat up right now.

If their OL gets healthy and their D picks it up they will be even tougher to beat.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 19, 2011, 08:14:22 am
The obvious question about the Bears is, are they as good as the team that thrashed the Vikings, or as bad as the team that shat the bed against the Lions? And the obvious answer is, neither. Which makes it virtually impossible at this point to guess with any confidence whether we finish 5-11, 10-6, or somewhere in between.

IMO, our deficiencies in talent/depth, our erratic coaching, the games we've already lost and the games still on the schedule cap this team at about 10 wins so the questions are whether we can attain that, and if 10-6 would be enough for the last wildcard spot especially since we have already spotted games to the Lions and Saints that could come back to haunt us in a tiebreaker.

Personally I don't see a playoff team in this years squad but with the Packers being the only team in the NFC without an apparent glaring weakness, who knows?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on October 19, 2011, 12:07:17 pm
Packers D:

Pro-bowler Safety Nick Collins out for the season

Mike Neal (Cullen Jenkins replacement) out nearly all season so far

Sam Shields missed games - has a cast on hand..

Zombo out

Walden missed time

Seems to be a different line-up every game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 19, 2011, 12:12:38 pm
if we call a similar game plan on the O side the rest of the season we'll do much better.
Getting Carimi and Bennett back will make us better too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 19, 2011, 01:45:02 pm
I'm having a hard time believing Bennett is missing so many games.

Have to wonder if that Roman Harper hit broke some ribs or something.  Obviously it was quite a bit more serious of an injury than the Bears front office let on at the time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 19, 2011, 08:20:47 pm
Why arent we hearing more about the injury and when we can expect him back?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 20, 2011, 09:16:49 am

I really don't know what advantage Lovie expects in being so secretive about the specifics on an injury.

Injury report is listing Bennett as fully participating in practice - looks to me like he should be playing this weekend.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 20, 2011, 09:27:00 am
you don't think they would hold Bennett out to try to get him more reps with Roy do you?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 20, 2011, 09:33:31 am
My guess is they are hoping they dont need him and can give him an extra week to recuperate with the bye week next week. But I think going into the bye at 4-3 instead of 3-4 is important enough to get Bennett out there if they can. Tape him up.  Whatever!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 20, 2011, 09:40:18 am
Bennett must have been seriously tattooed on that Harper hit. He's been MIA for a month. I hope there wasn't internal damage.

Either that or they have some other reason for not wanting him on the field.

If in fact they are milking the situation in order to get RoyBoy more reps then that's B.S. and Lovie needs to be called on it. Bennett is our best WR and needs to be on the field if, and as soon as, he's physically able.

Depending on Hester's injury status they may need to play Bennett in London just to have enough WRs to put on the field. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 20, 2011, 09:45:31 am
Dan Pompeii puts the mother of all hatchet jobs on Jay Cutler in today's Tribune.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-1020-pompei-bears-chicago--20111020,0,1295522.column

Be warned, this article is the most disgusting piece of trash I've ever seen.  If I were Jay Cutler I would never grant an interview to Pompeii or answer one of his questions in a press conference again.  Ever.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 20, 2011, 09:57:37 am

I think Roy Williams and Knox play the same position in this offense.  Hester plays another and Bennet and Sanzenbacher play a 3rd spot, the slot.

Never understood why they can't be more interchangeable.  Why can't Williams play more with Knox, etc?  I understand the slot is nearer the LOS and has more routes over the middle.  But what is the difference between the split end and the flanker other than 1 yard closer to the LOS?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 20, 2011, 10:01:07 am
I'll take it with a grain of salt. Some of what he says has merit. If that happened to me I'd just shut my mouth and ignore it. Sometimes you have to be bigger than criticism.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 20, 2011, 10:02:11 am
And maybe the players can enjoy snacks and juice after the game and then at the end of the season all the players can get little plastic trophies with blue ribbons.

With Kreutz gone somebody has to kick some azz...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 20, 2011, 10:31:46 am
With Kreutz gone somebody has to kick some azz...

Agreed. Looks to me like Cutler is stepping up and showing leadership, and is now getting knocked in the media for doing exactly what they were ripping him for (supposedly) not doing last year.  Absurd.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 20, 2011, 10:55:03 am
Wow...  could health issues arise again to derail the Lions' dream season?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/20/jahvid-best-misses-practice-amid-talk-he-could-sit-out-season/

The Lions have plenty of weapons on offense so they could absorb the loss of Best better than a lot of teams could.  Still, it would be a big blow.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 20, 2011, 12:14:44 pm
as long as they have Stafford and Calvin Johnson on O they can compete.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on October 20, 2011, 12:27:24 pm
They tried to get Ronnie Brown from the Eagles but the trade was voided
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 20, 2011, 01:31:14 pm
I'm glad the Lions didn't get Ronnie Brown.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on October 20, 2011, 03:10:10 pm
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/10/20/trade-voided-for-lions-harrison-after-doctors-found-brain-tumor/?test=latestnews

This is why the Ronnie Brown trade was voided
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 20, 2011, 03:25:17 pm
Sad for Harrison. Might have just saved his life.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 20, 2011, 03:26:57 pm
Yeah I saw that.  Two potentially season ending injuries at RB to the Lions this week.  That's big.

Speaking of Detroit, based on this updated map it looks like Fox's broadcast plans have changed dramatically for Sunday's games.

http://www.the506.com/temp11.html

Just a couple days ago this map showed much of the county getting Bears / Bucs as the early game but now it looks like Detroit / Atlanta will be the predominant matchup with the London game going only to the two teams' home markets and some of the Southwest.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 20, 2011, 08:19:16 pm
on NFLN there is a "A football life - Walter Payton" show is on if anyone is interested.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on October 21, 2011, 05:50:28 am
A different perspective on the Cutler/Martz exchange...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-1021-bowen-bears-chicago--20111021,0,7797393.column

When I read Pompei's article, nothing of it rang true to me.  This is football on Sundays, not everday life in the workplace.  I appreciate Bowen setting the record straight from a player's perspective.  Sure am sorry if Pompei got his feelings hurt or took offense to such strong language...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 21, 2011, 06:39:47 am
I think Pompei is way off base. I think Bowen is right. Pompei has never played the game
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on October 21, 2011, 07:46:01 am
Doesn't nearly every good QB give "the look" yell, say some thing to players who screw up?

Pompei is either stupid or  trying to sell papers with trash journalism.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 21, 2011, 07:57:07 am
Pompei is either stupid or  trying to sell papers with trash journalism.

Both.

He's just another little pin-dick weasel sportswriter without a conscience or a clue.

I know we've all been frustrated by #6 at some point in his Bears career, but given what he's got to work with he has played dam well this season and the constant fault-finding with him has gotten way beyond old already.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 21, 2011, 11:21:25 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/21/olin-kreutz-leaves-saints/



The decision to not re-sign him is looking better and better.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 21, 2011, 12:43:07 pm
Always was a bit of an odd duck.  They have a way of behaving .....oddly.  BTW, and not being sarcastic, how many bad snaps this year? Any?  Garza seems to be doing ok.  Good for him. I'll always remember that block he made springing Forte for a TD down in Indy, when the Bears were designated cannon fodder for the opening of Indy's new stadium.  Didn't go to script as Ortin and the Bears won. Betcha you can get tickets real cheap now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 21, 2011, 01:18:42 pm
Kreutz retired today.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 21, 2011, 01:40:17 pm
This seems like one of those deals where the class thing all-around would be to sign him back to the Bears on a 1-day deal so he could retire a Bear.  But maybe too many bridges have been burned for that to happen.

I hope Kreutz does OK and has a solid support system to keep him from going off the rails.  He seems like one of those guys that could have a hard time adjusting to being out of the league. 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 21, 2011, 01:51:37 pm
he might be good to get an OL coaching gig.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on October 22, 2011, 07:01:16 am
Hold up this is all the play the Kruetz retirement thing gets on this board.

First off vindication for us that have been saying he was washed up.  I personally have felt that way for 2 years.  Many others here acted like Bears not resigning him for 4.5 million a year was a terrible mistake.  Ha!

Second Olin Kruetz retired as he was about to ride pine.  A player like Kruetz just does retire mid season.  The saints allowed him to save face by calling it a retirement.

Third Olin was a great Bear for many years (just not the last 2) and deserves to be brought back for a day and retire a Bear no matter how bad the bridge was burned.

Kruetz was undersized when he entered league and was downright small as DT's get bigger and strong.  Get player, leader and Bear.  However he was in obvious decline for years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 22, 2011, 08:36:10 am
Just thinkng if the Bear has resigned him, not moved on, what that line would look like about now. Worse than it is.  I'm the first to **** about the moves of JA and Phillips, but they did the right thing there. Good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 22, 2011, 05:05:40 pm

Hiber

I haven't read much about Kreutz retiring - just heard it on the radio.  Was he in fact benched?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 22, 2011, 05:49:29 pm

 "I think Roy Williams and Knox play the same position in this offense.  Hester plays another and Bennet and Sanzenbacher play a 3rd spot, the slot.

Never understood why they can't be more interchangeable.  Why can't Williams play more with Knox, etc?  I understand the slot is nearer the LOS and has more routes over the middle.  But what is the difference between the split end and the flanker other than 1 yard closer to the LOS?"

 I think the difference kicks in if the QB is left or right handed.

 A right handed QB wants to go to the split.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 22, 2011, 05:50:56 pm
Kreutz retired today.

 Thats a surprise ... first I heard of it.

 http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/New-Orleans-Saints-Olin-Kreutz-leaves-team-102111/?ocid=ansfox11
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 12:11:26 pm
Why did they decline that penalty?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 12:19:33 pm
Forte is the man!

7-0 Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 12:21:12 pm
What is impressive about that drive is the Bucs are playing the run 100%.  Forte has 59 rushing yards already and a TD in two drives.

Good job by the O-line getting a body on a body but most of it is Forte making one or two guys miss.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 12:35:09 pm
**** you Roy Williams and Marion Barber!

If the Bears lose this game it is their fault!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 12:35:56 pm
Conte!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 23, 2011, 12:36:00 pm
catch the ball!!!!  fck!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 12:36:55 pm
FFFUUUCK!!!!

I guess 2 is better then 7 though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 12:47:28 pm
Defense holds.  Bears starting inside their own 5. 

Need to get something going on O here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 01:07:45 pm
TD Williams!

14-2 Bears!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 23, 2011, 01:08:01 pm
14-2. Roy boy is rapidly turning into mr. Williams sir for me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 01:32:33 pm
14-5 Bears at the half. 

Bucs get the ball first.  The D needs to play a little better then that last drive.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 01:48:49 pm
Hell of a play by Peppers to bring that back down for a loss.  I thought he had the corner but Peppers was faster then the RB.  Nice!

That guy earns every penny.

Now pay Forte.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 23, 2011, 01:52:40 pm
(Ahem). Mr williams, nice catch.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 23, 2011, 01:54:46 pm
The bear chewing them up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 01:55:21 pm
Ok Barber and Williams are absolved.

Ominus dominus!

GO BEARS!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 01:56:13 pm
Why does it take 5 games into the season each year to run this offense? 

They run this offense the Bears would have at least two more wins.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 02:06:26 pm
Why refuse a 10 yard penalty?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 02:14:25 pm
I knew Gould was going to miss as soon as I saw him messing with his cross necklace.  He never does that and was obviously thinking about the record. 

DUMB ASSSS!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 02:45:42 pm
Bears better get their **** together on offense.  They are killing us right now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 02:49:25 pm
If the Bears lose this game after dominating I am going to be pissed!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 23, 2011, 02:55:56 pm
its all gone to hell.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 02:56:51 pm
21-18 Bears.

Bears lose this if they do not pull their head out of their ass!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 23, 2011, 03:17:25 pm
thank god for small favors.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 23, 2011, 03:18:56 pm
Whew!

DJ Moore gets the game ball.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on October 23, 2011, 03:42:11 pm
We should've had about 35 points. We fell apart in the 4th quarter..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Eastcoastfan on October 23, 2011, 07:37:11 pm
The play calling in the second half was beyond belief.  Three straight passes on first and goal as you are trying to run down the clock?  After your QB has thrown two picks?  Seriously, what is Martz's deal?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on October 24, 2011, 05:59:30 am
Yeah we have Marion B. to run the rock and take the punishment when we have the lead and trying to run down the clock.  Martz is overrated IMO.  I thought he did some nice things in Detroit, but his time as passed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 24, 2011, 08:25:47 am
Is it just me or does our D play a lot better when they see we're pounding the rock on the ground than when we're trying to throw the ball all over the field?  The difference in our D between the 1st half and the 2nd was too noticeable to be ignored.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on October 24, 2011, 09:15:05 am
Whew!

DJ Moore gets the game ball.



Good play but I was screaming at the TV for him to just go down. Didn't like him carrying it like a loaf of bread as he went out of bounds.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on October 24, 2011, 09:16:43 am
Yeah we have Marion B. to run the rock and take the punishment when we have the lead and trying to run down the clock.  Martz is overrated IMO.  I thought he did some nice things in Detroit, but his time as passed.

Why wasn't he in there on the safety play? We can't run it out of the end zone? Garza got owned on that play...shades of Olin Kreutz
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 24, 2011, 09:23:50 am
Garza got owned on the 3rd-and-1 run late in the game that got stuffed, as well. He has done pretty well for a career OG asked to play out of position but there is definite room for improvement and he's getting old.

I think the next stage in the evolution of our OL definitely has to be upgrading the C position, whether that be by moving Spencer over to his natural position or drafting an actual C next year, or both.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 24, 2011, 09:47:18 am
Need to draft a stud OG too. I saw Williams get owned too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 24, 2011, 09:50:53 am
I have a feeling Williams is going to be our starting LG for a good long time.  Lovie and Angelo have so much invested in him that if he even does a passable job the rest of this season, he'll stick.

Which means C and RG are going to be the focus of the interior upgrades.

I would like to see how this line would jell with Spencer at C, Lance Louis at his natural RG position and Carimi 100% healthy at RT. Unfortunately we may not see that combination till next year unless Garza gets injured (possible) or benched (extremely unlikely).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on October 24, 2011, 10:29:43 am
Since Spencer wasn't a very good center in Seattle I don't see him as becoming a good one with the Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 24, 2011, 10:46:13 am
I have actually been pleasantly surprised by Spencer and Lance Louis' play on the right side of our line especially since they are both playing out of position and are undersized for those roles (especially Louis at RT). What I think will ultimately happen next year is either Spencer will win the starting C job, or he'll fight Louis for the RG spot and the loser of that battle will stick as a swing backup.

The effort we make (or don't make) this offseason towards drafting or otherwise acquiring a C will tell us a lot about where they see Spencer ultimately fitting in.  In any event, the experience being gained at G and T by Spencer and Louis, respectively, can only benefit us longer term from a depth perspective if nothing else.  I for one am extremely thankful Louis has been up to the task at RT cause we would be in deep shi-t if we had not had an alternative to Omiyale at RT. 

As for OMG, he has turned out to be a[nother] very expensive and embarrassing Angelo mistake and he should be cut the day our season ends if not sooner.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 24, 2011, 11:04:23 am
Just looking at NFL.com and among the top 20 ranked passers, there are only three with completion percentages under 60%. Jay Cutler is one of them.

We need to get that fixed, and that falls on Martz and our WRs just as much as Cutler if not more so.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on October 24, 2011, 11:22:41 am
Hester and Roy Williams had some drops yesterday
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 24, 2011, 11:25:15 am
Plus Martz' offensive scheme is high risk high reward which doesn't lend itself to a high completion percentage.

In a more traditional offense I think Cutler could be up there in the mid-60s for completions pretty easily.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 24, 2011, 12:15:58 pm
Yes to all the above. I was shocked at how much better the line played yanking one guy, ONE, out. Its like a damn has been sealed. Saw where Martz is getting panned in the Trib for playcalling. Good. Hopefully he's taking his lead from Tice.  This is getting spooky though.  If the Bear had kept Olin and Manning, they'd be without......Olin and Manning. I still can't figure out what happened the 4th qtr.  Jet lag? dunno. Someone said they were glad the game wasn't longer, probably was right.  Its like the air went out of the balloon.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 24, 2011, 12:32:38 pm
I still can't figure out what happened the 4th qtr.  Jet lag? dunno. Someone said they were glad the game wasn't longer, probably was right.  Its like the air went out of the balloon.

I think what happened in the 2nd half was Martz went off-script and started getting pass happy and our D got pissed and let off the gas a bit. Plus possibly some late onset jet lag.

In the first half our D was playing lights out and we just happened to be pounding the rock on the ground as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 24, 2011, 01:12:36 pm
It almost seemed like we were in some kind of prevent defense in the 4th quarter. We couldnt get to the QB and he had all day to find his receivers, which he did. We ended up darn near losing that game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 24, 2011, 01:22:42 pm
It almost seemed like we were in some kind of prevent defense in the 4th quarter. We couldnt get to the QB and he had all day to find his receivers, which he did. We ended up darn near losing that game.

Totally agree on the prevent D. There were plays in the 4th quarter where it looked like we weren't rushing more than 3 guys and none of them were getting close.

I've said this before, but wins like yesterday are why Lovie and the Bears don't get a lot of respect in some quarters. Based on the first half we should have won going away but it wound up coming right down to the last possession again.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 24, 2011, 01:34:36 pm
you get more respect when you win 62-7 than when you almost lose in the 4th.
Sometimes I wonder if when we get a lead if Martz tries some stuff to see how it works in a game, to put stuff on film for other teams or something like that. I can see him playing games like that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 24, 2011, 01:50:00 pm
Saints are a weird team this year.  They make the Bears look worse than they actually are, they annihilate a bad (but not that bad) Colts team...  but they also lose to the Bucs and barely survive the Panthers.  Tough to figure those guys out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 24, 2011, 05:09:56 pm
The Bears were blitzing in the first half.  After they got the lead they stopped blitzing. 

The safeties are playing 20 yards down field  first and second half and with no pressure there are huge holes in the zones.  Lots of time for a Pro QB and open holes in the zone mean easy scoring drives.

I will never undersatand why Lovie stops calling defenses that are working.  Make them show you they can beat them before changing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on October 24, 2011, 07:34:42 pm
The Pack let the Vikes come back also.  There would have been some mighty hand wringing going on here had that happened to us.  Which it did.  Which there has been.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on October 25, 2011, 07:49:54 am
The Bears were blitzing in the first half.  After they got the lead they stopped blitzing. 

The safeties are playing 20 yards down field  first and second half and with no pressure there are huge holes in the zones.  Lots of time for a Pro QB and open holes in the zone mean easy scoring drives.

I will never undersatand why Lovie stops calling defenses that are working.  Make them show you they can beat them before changing.

Yeah that has been the thing about Lovie all along.  Doesnt go for the jugular.  When you have them down, keep kicking them dummy, dont let them come back and make it close.  Sheesh.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on October 25, 2011, 08:19:46 am
Sportsmanship is an ideal concept
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on October 25, 2011, 08:25:50 am
I can see not hanging 60 on an opponent but I don't see a problem with winning by 30.
We can give up 3 TD's easy.
Also, once you call off the dogs, it is hard to turn them back on.

I would try to destroy every team, I think the confidence of beating a team well helps you going forward so you don't question or second guess yourself. I also think that if you are soundly beating teams, it gets other teams to think about it. "Man those Bears beat Minny and TB by 30 pts, they are going to be tough". It think I would rather an opponent be thinking like that instead of "man, those bears almost lost to TB and almost lost to Minny, we can beat these guys!"
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 25, 2011, 09:03:48 am
Nav, I agree with every word you said.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on October 25, 2011, 09:49:08 am
Gentleman's game...

I like it...

Kinda like how Urlacher and Briggs make some awesome tackles - but very seldom make helmet-to-helmet hits like other headhunters on other teams...

Lovie wants this team to be respected - not feared...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on October 25, 2011, 09:54:26 am
Heheheh. I just posted something of the same thing over in the other thread (about no killer instinct on this team). Great minds think alike :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on October 25, 2011, 10:02:33 am
In youth football - we want our kids to hit the other kids really hard... but we don't want them to get injured...

I enjoy watching hard fought close games better than blowouts.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 25, 2011, 10:29:19 am
Can't really complain about the Bears defense Sunday.  They basically gave up 2 TDs and a FG.  Unfortunately the 2 TDs were in the 4th quarter.

I never understood why people think that just because you have a lead in the 4th quarter that the game is automatically over.  In fact, the Bears having a 2 TD lead forces the other team into passing mode which our defense really isn't designed to stop.   

Freeman was only sacked 8 times in 6 games coming into the game.  He's big and tall, mobile and will not flinch when delivering a throw.   Bears only had the one sack but pressured Freeman into a lot of throwaways, dumps and picks.  Can't complain about the defense getting 4 picks - offense should have put up 30 something points.

Bears style of defense is to play somewhat passive with the 4 DBs and let the underneath guys go for the picks.  This year our linebackers Urlacher and Briggs along with DJ Moore have all our interceptions with the lone exception being Conte's big pick Sunday. 

Conte had a nice game and Chris Harris again had an uneven game.  But our DTs showed up.  We just need a 3rd DE to step up.  The Bucs attempted a pass over 50 times!

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 25, 2011, 10:55:49 am
We just need a 3rd DE to step up.

Nick Reed was getting a lot of play vs. the Bucs I noticed.

Does anyone know the latest on Wootton?  I'm starting to wonder if he's even gonna be a factor this year...

I'm also kind of surprised we haven't seen them at least trying Melton on the outside on certain downs.  I know that had been mentioned some in the past.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on October 25, 2011, 06:39:50 pm
The Pack let the Vikes come back also.  There would have been some mighty hand wringing going on here had that happened to us.  Which it did.  Which there has been.

The Pack needs a better pass rush or there will be problems in the future playing good teams.  Neal must get healthy.  Talkeaways have saved them a couple of games.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on October 26, 2011, 09:59:44 am
If the Bears don't get the takeaways (or some special team plays) they generally lose. I guess the same can be said for most teams :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: ISF on October 26, 2011, 10:48:42 am
Peter King answers my question first in his mailbag column this week:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/peter_king/10/25/Texans/index.html?sct=nfl_t11_a0

Was nice to see him admit he should have had the Bears in his rankings.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 26, 2011, 11:21:08 am
Interesting article in the Trib today raises the question of whether Carimi's return to the lineup might displace Chris Williams.

The thought process being, Spencer is doing pretty well at RG so rather than bench him for Louis, let him stay where he is and start Louis at LG.

Like I said, I don't think Chris Williams is going anywhere, but if the goal is to get your 5 best O-Linemen on the field it's something that would have to be considered, I think.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 26, 2011, 11:43:22 am
You know, as I look at the Eagles, I wonder if we might not want to just stick with our going OL lineup for one more game... even if Carimi is cleared to play.

Lance Louis is exceptionally small to be playing RT at 6'3, 320...  however, the Eagles roll with a small, quick DL (no DEs over 270 lbs).  So it seems to me against that opponent, a guy with Louis' quickness and tenacity on the edge might be just the ticket.  Whereas a much bigger (and possibly not quite 100%) Carimi could struggle against those guys especially if he's still getting his legs back under him.

Just a thought.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 26, 2011, 12:56:12 pm

If Carimi is ready to play - he starts.  No question.  Louis has done an admirable job playing LT but he was struggling a bit late against the Bucs in pass protection. 

As for the guard position Chris Williams has been solid for a month and should keep his job at LG and Lance Louis replaces Spencer.

Perhaps we should be asking is Spencer better than Garza?  Maybe next year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 26, 2011, 12:58:47 pm
Perhaps we should be asking is Spencer better than Garza?  Maybe next year.

I agree, and I think that's where things are ultimately heading.

(L to R)  Webb - Williams - Spencer - Louis - Carimi

I doubt it happens this year though unless Garza gets hurt or just completely collapses at C for some other reason.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 26, 2011, 01:36:06 pm
Lance Briggs was named NFC Defensive Player of the Week for his performance Sunday against the Bucs.

So that's Briggs and Urlacher with that honor so far this year on D, Hester one week for STs and IIRC, Forte one week on offense.

4 NFC POW awards in 7 weeks. That's not bad.

The Bears may not have as many top-shelf players as the league's truly "elite" teams...  but the good players we do have are playing up to their abilities and that's good to see.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on October 26, 2011, 05:13:13 pm
Don't forget Spencer has a broken hand.  If Carimi comes back Spencer goes to the bench at least until he is heals up I am guessing.  It is not easy playing football with a cast on your hand.  So that makes how well he has been playing even better.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 27, 2011, 03:35:41 am
 Anyone want to give any credit to Clutts yet? I love that name.  ;D

 We could rename him Clutch Cargo.

 He looks like ol Clutch.  :D ;)

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11F3RRcPbFg&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11F3RRcPbFg&feature=related)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on October 27, 2011, 04:28:41 am
Yeah that has been the thing about Lovie all along.  Doesnt go for the jugular.  When you have them down, keep kicking them dummy, dont let them come back and make it close.  Sheesh.


Fox said Lovie was part of the "polite police". If he knocked someone down, he'd help 'em up and tell 'em he didn't mean it..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 27, 2011, 08:10:51 am
I've heard that one of the biggest reasons the McCaskey's love Lovie so much is that they know he will never do anything to embarrass them.

Apparently the McCaskey's aren't embarrassed by boneheaded in-game decisions and stubborn non-adjustments that lose us games we could have won.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 27, 2011, 08:32:06 am
No, they're not. Neither one ruduces the revenue stream to the untold thousands of McCaskey's leeching of the team, nor raise eyebrows with the McCaskey's "friends".
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on October 27, 2011, 01:13:24 pm
Chris Harris has been released.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 27, 2011, 04:18:47 pm
#46 booted for a cut seventh round draft pick from the mighty rams. I betcha TO is glad the offer from Chicago was from the Rush, not the Bear.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-sign-lb-williams-off-waivers-from-rams-20111027,0,7036941.story

Honest to God, What?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on October 27, 2011, 11:49:26 pm
Bears probably lead the league in acquisitions and forfeitures....lets pick up X and drop Y then pickup Z and drop X then pickup A and drop Z and then...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 28, 2011, 12:32:50 am
 You will all have to forgive me but I am kind of on a Doug Plank jag right now ...

 In 2001, Plank began his coaching career as a defensive coordinator in the Arena Football League for 3 seasons under former Dallas QB Danny White.

 In those 3 seasons, the Arizona Rattlers played in 3 consecutive Arenabowls.

 In 2004, Plank was hired by Arthur Blank to be head coach of the Georgia Force, an Arena Football team he owned in addition to the Atlanta Falcons.

 Plank was named the AFL's Coach of the Year in 2005 and 2007 as he led Georgia to the playoffs each year and ArenaBowl XIX in his first year at the helm in 2005.

 In Plank's first four years as an AFL head coach, he won more games in that period than any other coach in the history of the Arena League.

 In 2008, he was a seasonal assistant on the Atlanta Falcons staff.

 The Falcons played in the first round of the NFL playoffs.

 In 2009 he served as the assistant defensive backfield coach for the New York Jets under head coach Rex Ryan, the son of Plank's former defensive coordinator, Buddy Ryan.

 The 2009 Jets defense led the NFL in fewest total yards allowed, fewest points allowed, and fewest TD passes allowed.    
 
 The Jets played in the AFC championship game versus the Colts.

 In 2010, Plank became a football program assistant at Ohio State.

 The Buckeyes earned a share of the Big 10 title with an 11-1 record and beat Arkansas in the Sugar Bowl.

 ______________________________________________________________________________________

 I can think of alot of HC's to replace who we have ... OR ... who could compliment them.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on October 28, 2011, 06:10:03 am
JJ- Good observations on Plank.  I never followed him that much to know his success as a coach, post Bears...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 28, 2011, 03:33:16 pm
Harris picked up by the Lions. Excellent. Just excellent.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on October 28, 2011, 07:51:51 pm
And we still have a game left with the Lions
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on October 29, 2011, 07:18:45 am
If he plays against us, like he did against the Lions - I like our chances.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on October 29, 2011, 07:28:40 am
And if you really want to wring your hands over our safety position which was solid last year, Manning is the one we should have kept.  I know he is hurt now but if Harris really ran out of gas, letting Manning go was the move you should be most upset with.  Funny how our trash always looks better...

I like what I have seen of Conte so far and am on the fence with Wright so far.  But Wright has a chance to improve so we shall see.  Harris had declined and he was a tweetin' fool, Lovie just said if you aren't starting, and your're declining, I really don't need a person around chirping about his own situation.  To his credit, and the only credit I'll give him - what have you heard out of Merriweather since his benching?  And I bet when he does get back on the field he plays more the way Lovie wants him to, versus the way he started out.  Sitting on the bench has a humbling effect.  Pro Bowl safety with Patriots, released, picked up by Bears and starts, then is benched.  Diminished skills or a career lesson?  We can only hope that he gets the message because I think he still has some football left in him.  Wright has proven fragile so far, it would be nice to have a veteran option behind him should he go down again.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 29, 2011, 08:26:48 am
Its not the play of the player, its the background he brings. How players are Really hurting, pissed off, broke, etc. all that is unrecorded and unspoken, but known. NFL is like any other business, a giant gossip mill that can have tidbits to be used.  Betcha Olin down south had a field day with that.  From reading the Bears do nothing out of the ordinary compared to other NFL teams, so I doubt Detroit getting the playbook has all that impact.  Finding out if certain player has problems to be corrected to get better or back to where they were- that can and will be used.  46 got dumped, period.  How many Bears in the past lasted how many years through the season fat and happy? Bears seem to simply ignore certain positions.  Safety comes to mind.  How many decades before it was decided to get a real quarterback?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 31, 2011, 10:39:40 am
Bears' game vs. Lions moved back to 3:15 p.m.


The Chicago Bears' game Nov. 13 against the Detroit Lions at Soldier Field has been moved back to a 3:15 p.m. CT start, the team announced Monday.

The game, originally scheduled for noon, was moved back to accommodate Fox Sports, which will televise the game as part of its doubleheader package.

The Bears' first game against the Lions was a prime-time Monday night showcase Oct. 10 in Detroit, with the Lions winning 24-13.

The Bears will wear their alternate orange jerseys for the game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 31, 2011, 10:56:23 am
That Lions rematch at Soldiers is shaping up to be huge. I can see why Fox would want to increase coverage of that one.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 31, 2011, 11:22:17 am
Will the Bears ever have another 12:00 kickoff time in Chicago? Night games, odd days, out of country, away games, heavens sakes!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on October 31, 2011, 12:37:12 pm
I'm sure the Seattle game time is safe.  :)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on October 31, 2011, 02:55:18 pm
And if you really want to wring your hands over our safety position which was solid last year, Manning is the one we should have kept.  I know he is hurt now but if Harris really ran out of gas, letting Manning go was the move you should be most upset with.  Funny how our trash always looks better...

Bears thought they were set with Harris coming off a fine season and the rookie Wright showing some potential.  Manning never had the instincts to play FS so he was the odd man out without a contract.  The thing about Manning was his speed let the Bears line him up on a WR one-on-one on certain formations and he could catch up with opponents that broke away from the pack.  But he never was a ball hawk and was thought expendable because they had 2 other guys to return kicks.


I like what I have seen of Conte so far and am on the fence with Wright so far.  But Wright has a chance to improve so we shall see.  Harris had declined and he was a tweetin' fool, Lovie just said if you aren't starting, and your're declining, I really don't need a person around chirping about his own situation.  To his credit, and the only credit I'll give him - what have you heard out of Merriweather since his benching?  And I bet when he does get back on the field he plays more the way Lovie wants him to, versus the way he started out.  Sitting on the bench has a humbling effect.  Pro Bowl safety with Patriots, released, picked up by Bears and starts, then is benched.  Diminished skills or a career lesson?  We can only hope that he gets the message because I think he still has some football left in him.  Wright has proven fragile so far, it would be nice to have a veteran option behind him should he go down again.

Good points Grizz.  I'm sure Harris public complaining didn't sit well with the coaches or Angelo. 

As for Meriweather, some here have already written him off, but I'm not sure why - too early.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on October 31, 2011, 03:28:24 pm
The safety position for the Chicago Bears has pretty much been a non-stop clusterfark ever since Mike Brown hit the skids.

I can't think of any team that has invested more draft picks and more FA dollars into one area of the team and wound up with so little to show for it.

The bad play of our safeties for years on end is a flat-out embarrassment with blame to be equally shared by Angelo, Lovie and DB coach Rod Hoke.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 31, 2011, 09:01:53 pm
The trib is reporting that Erik Kramer's 18 year old son has died.  Unbelievabley awful.  Rumors of booze. Kid was a hs qb. Good lord.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on October 31, 2011, 09:02:07 pm
The trib is reporting that Erik Kramer's 18 year old son has died.  Unbelievabley awful.  Rumors of booze. Kid was a hs qb. Good lord.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on October 31, 2011, 11:35:44 pm

 The reason that I brought up Doug Plank is Merriwether fits Plank's style.

 If the NFL wil allow him to play with the new rules.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 01, 2011, 09:15:16 am

Plank never had Merriweather's ball skills.  Plank didn't care about interceptions he'd rather get in a good hit.

Gary Fencik said he considered changing his #45 - he said it was too close to #46 and folks would get the 2 confused.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 01, 2011, 09:39:04 am
I haven't seen a lot of ball skills out of Merriwether.  In fact I haven't seen a lot of anything except from him except bad judgment on the field.

So far anyway Merriwether looks to be another expensive Angelo vanity signing that has returned practically nothing in terms of real benefits on the field.  $3 mil is a hell of a lot to pay any safety, much less a backup.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 01, 2011, 01:19:59 pm
much less a backup that is getting out played by a rookie!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 01, 2011, 04:13:12 pm
Anyone think this guy is worth a look?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/01/browns-bounce-brian-robiskie/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 01, 2011, 06:35:20 pm
Not if Holmgren gave up on him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 02, 2011, 10:38:06 am
Forte playing for teammates, self amid stalled contract talksBy Marc Sessler NFL.com

Published: Nov. 2, 2011 at 09:05 a.m. Matt Forte keeps playing, but the Bears aren't paying.

The team, sitting roughly $18 million below the salary cap, remains reluctant to complete a long-term extension for the running back who turns 26 in December, instead planning to slap him with their franchise tag after the season, according to the Chicago Tribune.

While the franchise designation would pay Forte roughly $7.7 million for 2012, it leaves him in limbo once again for 2013. Not ideal career planning for a premier NFL back.

Forte's comments to ESPN Chicago on Tuesday suggest a man who's peeked behind the curtain at the game's underbelly.

"I learned that it really is a business and that they really don't care about your personal life or anything like that," Forte said. "It's the National Football League and these organizations are in a business. That's the bad part about it.

"I know I'm loyal to my teammates -- and my team are my guys -- but it doesn't seem like the organization is to me. But that doesn't keep me from going out on the field and putting my best out there."

Bears fans are saying, "Pay the man," but we have to wonder if the Bears' front office is semi-freaked by the grim scenario in Tennessee, where the Titans handed a massive contract to Chris Johnson, only to see him vanish off the map.

Different story here. Forte's the league's sixth-leading rusher and has repeatedly rescued the team in games this season. Apparently, that's not enough in Chicago.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 02, 2011, 10:46:38 am
we have to wonder if the Bears' front office is semi-freaked by the grim scenario in Tennessee, where the Titans handed a massive contract to Chris Johnson, only to see him vanish off the map.

If that's the case then that is just chickensh-it thinking in Halas Hall.

Forte has given the Bears several years of prime rib play for a Spam price tag. Even if Forte never has another season as good as this one, he still deserves a huge payday as back-pay for all the production he has given (and continues to give) the Bears for peanuts.

My personal belief is that Angelo and Ruskell are holding up the deal in hopes Forte gets hurt this season which would decrease his leverage.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 02, 2011, 01:14:32 pm
they paid Urlacher they need to pay Forte.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 02, 2011, 01:31:03 pm
And Urlacher was already getting a nice sized paycheck before they re-upped him.

Forte has played his entire career for the NFL equivalent of minimum wage.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 02, 2011, 02:40:53 pm
Forte got a 4yr deal worth almost $4M so he has made  a little but he should make more than that in 1yr. I agree Urlacher got paid while already getting a decent contract. They need to do the right thing, I don't care about the business.

Those borderline guys that produce at a high level but create noise, those are the guys that you use the tag on.
Guys like Forte, you pay them, send a message to all the guys in the league. If he gets some kind of season ending injury, you live with it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 02, 2011, 02:52:48 pm
Well we all pretty much know this is no surprise. This organization,except for a few cases, is pretty ignorant about how they do things.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 02, 2011, 06:52:39 pm
Forte is definitely a class act.  He is the old school type of NFL player.  Hats off to him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on November 03, 2011, 08:59:47 am
I fear this is more a Ruskell thing than anything else- he's the heir apparent to the incompetent Angelo. One of the 1st things a new boss does is establish his boundaries- and Ruskell is probably trying to say "You will deal on my terms". Unfortunately, Ruskell appears as incompetent as Angelo ever was, so this power play is going to ensure that the Bears screw up a good thing they have going with Forte.

Just speculation, but I've seen it done in business over and over and over again when a new boss comes in to replace the old boss.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 03, 2011, 09:09:07 am
One of the 1st things a new boss does is establish his boundaries- and Ruskell is probably trying to say "You will deal on my terms".

Yeah that approach worked out real well for him with the Hutchinson thing in Seattle, didn't it?  He let a perennial Pro Bowl O-Lineman walk and the whole OL imploded not too long afterwards followed by the rest of the Seahawks team.  They're still trying to recover.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 03, 2011, 11:48:05 am

I think this is a Phillips decision.  He's got a number he wants Angelo/Ruskell to negotiate with.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 03, 2011, 12:06:03 pm
from a strictly business standpoint it makes sense.
Let him play this year.
Franchise him next year.
Negotiate when you can on your terms.
If you get a team friendly deal you sign him.
If not you franchise him again the following year.
If Forte has a career ending injury the bears are out 8M.

The only way Forte "wins" is to take the tag for 2 yrs and then hit FA as a 28yo RB. By that time it is likley is isn't what he used to be.
The Bears have all the cards.
The only way Forte gets out of it early is to get injured or act injured so they don't throw the tag on him, let him sign a 1yr deal with another team to prove himself  healthy and then hit FA. All that is risky and he still is 27 when he might get his big payday.
Forte should have taken the deal earlier this year and be set for life.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 03, 2011, 12:50:41 pm
Well if Forte gets jacked by the Bears then all he has to do is wait till after he retires...  write a kiss-and-tell book about all the inner workings at Halas Hall...  make his millions off the book sales and blow the lid off this farce of a "pro football organization" in the process.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 03, 2011, 06:52:31 pm
What surprised me is that the new NFL/NFLA contract requires that each team meet a minimum payroll level.  I don't believe that the Bears are there, yet.  A new contract for Forte woulld make him happy and help reach the new conract payroll level.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 03, 2011, 07:07:59 pm
The Bears will spend the money before the season is over with.  They will extend some players.  Wether it is Forte or not depends on his expectations.

They offered him a very fair contract before the season and he turned it down.

He wanted a HUGE contract and to have the last year of this contract torn up.  You don't get both.  If he continues to produce and does not get hurt he will get paid a HUGE salary.  At worst he make 8 to 9 million next year if they tag him.

I understand why Forte keeps bitching about his pay.  However he has to realize he was offered a decent contract and turned it down.  The Bears have no reason to give him a HUGE contract.  They offered him more per year then he will make with the franchise tag on him.

He has never played as well as he has this year.  Perhaps tagging him each year is the way to keep him performing the way he is.  Perhaps he needs that new contract as his carrot?     
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on November 03, 2011, 08:51:45 pm
When's the last time the Bears paid somebody and it worked out?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 03, 2011, 10:31:30 pm
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh............ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm............er......................I'll get back to you on that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 04, 2011, 05:52:16 am
Urlacher is one, Briggs, Cutler got re-upped.  While Hester hasn't blossomed into a #1 the team hoped he would be, I still think he is a dangerous weapon and earning his new contract.

I would pay Forte, I think they will cool off and get something done in the offseason.  But when you see Chris Johnson in Tennessee, you see why they are stepping carefully.  Forte is powerfully built and more likely to take some punishment, though he really doesn't take big hits.  CJ looks like he is not making the decisions running the ball that he used to.  Just following his blockers to a space and then going down.  No more of those dynamic cutbacks that made him great, not making anyone miss.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 04, 2011, 05:54:41 am
I think Briggs, Tillman and Urlacher have been worth their money.
Jay is worth the money, we would be cellar dwellers again with the likes of Orton and I like Orton.
I'm not sold on Peppers but don't get to watch enough games. At what he is making I'm expecting Jared Allen.

I wonder if they could have written Forte's contract maybe with less guaranteed but more incentives (pro bowl, yard escalators, etc) if  they could have gotten him on board already.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 04, 2011, 07:22:48 am
The thing with Peppers is he always has to be accounted for in the opponents game plan. Doesn't mean he will always play up to his potential but he does make plays and frequently. How many sacks is he up to now?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on November 04, 2011, 08:04:10 am
If I'm the Bears, I play the Forte thing the same way. I like Forte, but I agree with Pekin, he was offered a fair contract and turned it down. Forte's playing good ball right now, more consistent than in the past (so it seems). So, the worst thing that can happen is he'll make 8 mil next season? My fukking heart bleeds for him..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 04, 2011, 09:56:56 am
Grizz I think has the right idea.  CJ down here has simply laid down for whatever reason after getting the contract.  Got sat last week for a while. Note to Bears management:  Matt Forte is not Chris Johnson. Just because they are at the same position doesn't mean they will react the same way.
Yes, he was offered a goodly sum. Should have taken it, IMO, but didn't.  Pay the man anyway. Offer some more, not a lot more, and go on.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 04, 2011, 10:18:03 am

I really don't know the details of the contract that was offered by the Bears or the contract that was being seeked by Forte's agent.    Not sure if it would make a difference if I did know.

This is the part of football I really have no interest in.  Unfortunately this is a big part of determining the makeup of the roster.  Its already been the main reason we traded Olsen.  And the Bears have a bunch of players with expiring contracts in the next year or two that will want to get paid.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 04, 2011, 10:51:34 am
The Bears will spend the money before the season is over with.  They will extend some players.  Wether it is Forte or not depends on his expectations.

They offered him a very fair contract before the season and he turned it down.

He wanted a HUGE contract and to have the last year of this contract torn up.  You don't get both.  If he continues to produce and does not get hurt he will get paid a HUGE salary.  At worst he make 8 to 9 million next year if they tag him.

I understand why Forte keeps ****ing about his pay.  However he has to realize he was offered a decent contract and turned it down.  The Bears have no reason to give him a HUGE contract.  They offered him more per year then he will make with the franchise tag on him.

He has never played as well as he has this year.  Perhaps tagging him each year is the way to keep him performing the way he is.  Perhaps he needs that new contract as his carrot?     

Oops.  I wasn't aware of that.  This changes my view quite a bit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on November 04, 2011, 01:17:57 pm
I don't like extending players before their contract is out.  Guys always play lights out in their contract years, like Forte is doing now, and you miss that by extending early.  Let them play out their contracts and then pay them fair market if you want to keep them.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on November 04, 2011, 11:47:06 pm

 Whatever it comes out to would we deny that he has earned the money?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 07, 2011, 08:05:48 am
Smart move by the Lions...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/07/agents-leonard-davis-is-joining-the-lions/

Why we never gave this guy a look is beyond me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 07, 2011, 08:08:35 am
Offensive Lineman....not on Angielows radar.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 07, 2011, 10:23:36 am

Leonard Davis is big...but old.  There was a reason the Cowboys cut him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 08, 2011, 08:48:03 am
I guess this means we won't be drafting a C next year...

Garza re-signed for 2 more years.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/08/bears-pay-the-man-but-its-not-forte/

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 08, 2011, 09:09:21 am
Urlacher is playing up to his contract this year too, after a couple seasons when I was really questioning it.

And Briggs has had a very good season as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 08, 2011, 09:12:24 am
Briggs is simply a STAR. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 08, 2011, 09:23:08 am
I was sure Briggs was gonna get flagged last night that time he shoved Vick out of bounds.

We got a little help from the stripes several times last night but we were overdue so I'll take it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 08, 2011, 09:56:09 am
If I were to get on a Beagles board today, I'd bet it's nothing but 'THOSE REFS SCREWED US!!'.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on November 08, 2011, 10:18:53 am
Bears have the tie breaker against Atlanta, Tampa and Philly.

If the beat Detroit they're both 6-3.     Detroit plays Packers twice    We're in decent wild card shape
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 08, 2011, 10:29:43 am

Game at a time.   Keep healthy.  Make it into the playoffs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 08, 2011, 10:52:32 am
If I were to get on a Beagles board today, I'd bet it's nothing but 'THOSE REFS SCREWED US!!'.

Maybe...  after they finish bitching about their soft, multimillion dollar CBs and their DL.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 08, 2011, 12:05:20 pm
Exactly....both were exceptionally soft. Their corners played with about as much intensity as Daisy May at a picnic. And their D line disappeared more times than Houdini!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on November 08, 2011, 12:19:35 pm
Before we get too full of ourselves let's not forget that they lost 2 starters in the secondary early on. Samual came back but the injury clearly slowed him down.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 08, 2011, 12:26:12 pm
I remember us gettting a pretty nice high-low shot on Vick late in the game, after pretty much a total lack of pass rush for most of the 2nd half.

I think it was Peppers and Izzy that got him.  Anyway it took him awhile to get up and I have to wonder if the effects of that didn't linger for the rest of the game when some of his throws were pretty badly off.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 08, 2011, 12:29:14 pm
Yea,saw that. Watching with the wife and was like 'OOoooh that one had to hurt!! He was bent backwards. Replay was nasty looking.' and yea it was Izzy on his back/legs and Pepp in front....ugly hit....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 08, 2011, 12:31:09 pm
Where that really paid off was that 4th-down throw late in the game where he threw to Maclin, who had plenty of room to run but the pass was high and when Maclin came down with it he fell...  a yard short and our guy tagged him down.

If Vick hits Maclin in stride on that throw, who knows?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 08, 2011, 03:08:37 pm
I'm liking our chances against detroit.
I have a couple of concerns
Peppers and Hester's health
they are coming off a bye and we are coming off a short week.

This is a different team than it was 4 weeks ago.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 08, 2011, 03:20:36 pm
Well after a year and a half, the Bears O finally seems to have established some consistency, an identity and some principles for success. Those being:

1)  Major touches (ground and air) for Forte.

2)  Shotgun, rollouts and play-action for Cutler

3)  Barber on short yardage and goal line situations

4)  Physical, intense and athletic play by the OL, especially against undersized DLs

5)  TEs heavily involved in both pass protection and run blocking

IMO, now is not the time to change anything.  That means:

1) Carimi stays on the bench

2) The end-arounds, bubble screens and other gadget plays stay tucked away in the back of the playbook

3)  Ditto for the deep dropback plays

4) We throw to Bennett as much as possible, to Knox/Hester when they're open, and to Roy Williams only when necessary

All this being said, the first Lions game was lost not by our O, but by our D.  They're the ones who really have to step up in Sunday's rematch.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 08, 2011, 06:15:25 pm
1) Carimi stays on the bench

Part of me wants to see Carimi back in the lineup, but part of me says if it ain't broke don't fix it.   And another part of me says maybe Lance Louis should be playing LT.

2) The end-arounds, bubble screens and other gadget plays stay tucked away in the back of the playbook

Maybe they should try that wildcat play that Stanford used where they pitch it back to the QB on an end around and he throws it downfield.  I never understood the wildcat formation.

3)  Ditto for the deep dropback plays

There were quite a few of those last night - if you can protect it then they need to be kept in the playbook.  I like how Martz/Tice were very creative in their pass blocking schemes.


4) We throw to Bennett as much as possible, to Knox/Hester when they're open, and to Roy Williams only when necessary

Roy had 3 catches last night.  Knox had one plus a big PI penalty.  And Hester had a catch, I guess, more like a lateral.


Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 08, 2011, 06:32:39 pm
I am thinking Carimi to LT and leave Louis where he is. 

Oh and Garza signed a new two year contract.  I am guessing that means he is the new center for good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 08, 2011, 06:39:43 pm
Urlacher is playing up to his contract this year too, after a couple seasons when I was really questioning it.

And Briggs has had a very good season as well.

Urlacher is playing very well, IMHO.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on November 09, 2011, 01:24:36 am
The Bears could run the table the rest of the season.

They have the AFC West coming up along with Seattle, Minny, and GB.  I say they'll beat Detroit Sunday so it's possible they could go into the playoffs on a hot streak.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 09, 2011, 03:59:02 am

...and earn them the top wildcard spot and a playoff visit to either NY Giants or the Saints.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 09, 2011, 07:31:16 am
IMHO they arent beating the Pack in Lamblow. That would be a monumental upset, so I doubt they run the table. It looks like they have a good shot at a wild card berth if they can win the rest of their games other than the Pack. They could even end up having a better record than the east champ or the west champ.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 09, 2011, 07:49:47 am
Where that really paid off was that 4th-down throw late in the game where he threw to Maclin, who had plenty of room to run but the pass was high and when Maclin came down with it he fell...  a yard short and our guy tagged him down.

If Vick hits Maclin in stride on that throw, who knows?

I was afraid of that play. Never understood why the pass was so high that he had to jump up for it with no defensive player immediately around him. My memory is vague and I dont remember how the DLine was applying pressure. I do understand why he lost his balance going up for the catch because it seemed behind him
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 09, 2011, 08:09:49 am
And another part of me says maybe Lance Louis should be playing LT.

This won't happen. Tice is in love with Webb and now that Webb isn't getting embarrassed on a weekly basis I think he's a lock at LT for the foreseeable future.

The only way I see Louis and Carimi existing in the same lineup is with Louis at OGs. Chris Williams is another coaches pet (and has been doing better) and Spencer has played extremely well on the other side so I'm not sure that's gonna happen either.

As far as running the table...  nope.  That 2nd Packers game is a loss and I have a feeling we'll drop at least one of those "winnable" games coming up in the next few weeks (AFC West and/or the Seahawks).  Remember this is  a Bears team that last season biffed back-to-back games, at home, that should have been layups (Seattle and Washington). No reason to think that couldn't happen again.

That all being said...  we've set ourselves up nicely for a Wildcard run by having tiebreakers over the Falcons and Bucs. Gotta take care of business against the Lions first and then go from there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on November 09, 2011, 08:27:26 am
IMHO they arent beating the Pack in Lamblow. That would be a monumental upset, so I doubt they run the table. It looks like they have a good shot at a wild card berth if they can win the rest of their games other than the Pack. They could even end up having a better record than the east champ or the west champ.

I think if the Pack are still unbeaten it puts an awful lot of additional pressure on them making them ripe for an upset. The closer they get to the unbeaten season the bigger the monkey on their back.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 09, 2011, 08:37:24 am
There's also the chance the Pack could pull what the Colts did a few years back if they've got everything locked up playoff wise.  I.e., rest a bunch of starters and if that means a loss so be it.

I'm not sure how the good folks in Green Bay would feel about taking that approach against the Bears in the last game of the regular season, however.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 09, 2011, 08:41:17 am
amazing that bears will need 11-5 for a wc. When did the nfc north become so good? that gb game is winnable. I'm still a glass half empty guy though. just my nature.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 09, 2011, 08:59:32 am
As much as it would suck to be a 10-win team that misses the playoffs, it's not like it hasn't happened before. That first loss to the Lions almost counts as two losses in that regard.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 09, 2011, 11:16:45 am
The remaining 3 games that I fear most are Chicago and two at Detroit.  I'm not kidding!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 09, 2011, 11:36:43 am
The interesting thing about the Bears is that, when everything is clicking, they are almost ideally set-up to win games the old fashioned way.

1) Strong ground game

2) A mobile QB with good pocket presence and a quick release

3) Effective short to medium range passing game that can keep the chains moving and occasionally break one for big yards-after-catch

4) A defense that occasionally gives up a big scoring play but is physical, relatively fast, plays with discipline and can force the occasional turnover

5) Special teams that can turn the field and also present a scoring threat

Now, the question is, can a "balanced" team like the Bears still succeed in today's NFL?  Or has the balance of power shifted to teams that are overwhelmingly powerful on one side of the ball (Packers / Patriots on offense, or Ravens / Steelers on defense)?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 09, 2011, 07:26:18 pm
The ability of Chi and Det defense to bring pressure with 4 men, especially up then middle is the main rub that I see for a Chi/GB matchup or a Det/GB matchup.  GB must score a lot to cover up this year's pass defense.

The Pack needs for Neal to return to action and remain healthy on defense.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on November 09, 2011, 08:35:25 pm
I dont know if it is by design or just self preservation, but Cutler seems like he is moving around/rolling out a lot more than before.  Good for him. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 09, 2011, 08:46:30 pm
I just watched the NFLN replay.  Forte was awesome except for the two fumbles. 

Cutler was unreal.  The guy was making play after play.  He would of made more but Hester, Williams and Sanzenbacher all left a lot of yards on the field.

I sure hope Peppers and Hester can be close to 100% because we will need them both.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 10, 2011, 07:04:19 am
That one scramble by Cutler was unreal.....goes around in circles and piles up three Eagles on top of themselves trying to catch him,then tosses a completion.....crazy stuff....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 10, 2011, 07:49:25 am
I have a feeling it will be a long time before Forte fumbles again.  At least I sure hope so.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 10, 2011, 10:28:13 am
I think if the Pack are still unbeaten it puts an awful lot of additional pressure on them making them ripe for an upset. The closer they get to the unbeaten season the bigger the monkey on their back.

And it could come down to that game as a must win game for the Bears to make the playoffs too. And even if the Pack rest certain key players, I still think they beat the Bears in Lamblow
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 10, 2011, 01:54:28 pm

The Pack needs for Neal to return to action and remain healthy on defense.

Packrat

You front 7 is very average and the defense is getting bailed out by the turnovers from your DBs.  I told you before the season that you'd miss Jenkins but you seem really high on this Neal kid.   I guess he must have really looked good in preseason games - cuz he certainly hasn't played much in real games.

Aaron Rodgers is playing at such a high level that it may not make a difference.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 10, 2011, 02:13:49 pm
[b]I just watched the NFLN replay.  Forte was awesome except for the two fumbles. 

Both were aberrations.  The first one he had just completed a difficult catch and was in the process of putting it away when it got poked out.  And the 2nd one he was airborn trying to leap over a bunch of bodies.  The stat of 347 touches without a fumble is amazing.

Cutler was unreal.  The guy was making play after play.  He would of made more but Hester, Williams and Sanzenbacher all left a lot of yards on the field.

Watching Cutler frustrates the hell out of me.   He makes these great throws off balance using all arm and then he'll have a bunch of time in the pocket and still make an off balance throw  when he doesn't have to be off balance and miss the receiver.  It happens too much.

I don't blame Hester or Williams for those long incompletions - they were open and Cutler was short.  Sanzenbacher drops way too many catches for a guy who is small and slow.  I think he had 5 coming into the game.

I sure hope Peppers and Hester can be close to 100% because we will need them both.

Hester's contributions are uneven so we can probably make do without him for a week, not so Peppers.  When are we going to see Corey Wooten?  Nick Reid has been pretty quiet since the Atlanta game - time for a change.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 10, 2011, 02:21:58 pm
Watching Cutler frustrates the hell out of me.   He makes these great throws off balance using all arm and then he'll have a bunch of time in the pocket and still make an off balance throw  when he doesn't have to be off balance and miss the receiver.  It happens too much.

Agreed, and no question that sub-60% accuracy won't feed the bulldog in today's NFL.  But in his defense I think he's still skittish.  He has been physically abused at a historic rate since the first game he wore a Bears uni. It takes more than a couple weeks in a row of competent pass protection for a QB to recover from that, and some never do (see Marc Bulger).

I believe 100% that the frequency with which Cutler throws with good fundamentals will be directly proportional to how often he gets a clean pocket, whether that be through better blocking, playcalling (rollouts, play action), or whatever. Let's give him a couple more weeks of a strong run game and solid protection and see if his fundamentals (and accuracy) come around.  I'm very sure they will. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 10, 2011, 04:49:42 pm
The long throw to Williams hit him in the numbers.  You can't throw it any better then that.  The Sanzenbacher one went through his hands and legs.

Cutler did have a few inaccurate throws that were not going to be easy to catch however that one to Williams certainly was not one of them.  Every QB has a few throws that aren't on target.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 10, 2011, 05:55:47 pm
Tice gives line C+ midterm grade

 

Posted: 11/10/2011 5:18:00 PM

Asked to grade the Bears offensive line at the midpoint of the season, position coach Mike Tice gave the unit a C+.
 
“I think that’s fair,” Tice said Thursday. “We’ve had really good moments, some of which have gone unnoticed. We’ve had some really bad moments, most of which have been noticed, and we’re coming off a string of a couple solid games. But we have to get better because there are some things in that game [Monday night in Philadelphia] that irked me that we have to clean up.”
 
Starting the same five linemen the last three games, the Bears have averaged 31 points and 381.3 total yards while yielding only three sacks in wins over the Vikings, Buccaneers and Eagles. Against Philadelphia, the Bears did not allow a sack while rushing for 164 yards and a touchdown.
 
“Offensive lines have to play together because there’s so much communication involved,” Tice said. “We’ve had a few weeks where the guys are playing together and they know each other a little bit more and they know what they’re seeing. When they’re seeing it all the same way, they’re going to get better.”
 
While Tice is pleased with the line’s progress, he knows the unit isn’t close to reaching its potential.
 
“You have to have a vision of where guys can get to," Tice said. "Fortunately for me I’ve been doing it for 30 years in the league and I’ve seen good players, so I think I know what good players look like. Sometimes we don’t want to believe that and we want to have players play good right now. But the problem is they can’t play good right now; they have to develop.
 
“The kids have been working really hard. They’ve bought into coaching. They’ve bought into hard coaching. They’re willing to take criticism and make corrections. They work extremely hard in practice, so the residual of all that is improvement, and that’s what they’re doing; they’re getting better.
 
“They have certainly not arrived and you always have that fear as a coach that after a good game and you [reporters] are all kissing their butts right now that they start thinking they’re good. Well, they’re not good. They had a solid game, [but] they’ve got a long way to go because I could sit here right now and give you 10 things that each player did poorly in the game and have to get better at.”
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 10, 2011, 08:00:49 pm
The Pack needs for Neal to return to action and remain healthy on defense.

Packrat

You front 7 is very average and the defense is getting bailed out by the turnovers from your DBs.  I told you before the season that you'd miss Jenkins but you seem really high on this Neal kid.   I guess he must have really looked good in preseason games - cuz he certainly hasn't played much in real games.

Aaron Rodgers is playing at such a high level that it may not make a difference.

Neal has not played because of injuries.  The Pack decided to go with Neal nstead of paying the 30 year old Jenkins big money.

Neal's injury has hurt but who knew that would happen?  What if Jenkins had been the one injured instead of Neal?

The loss of pro-bowler Nick Collins has hurt more than anyone would have guessed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 11, 2011, 01:53:05 am

I can understand not giving a 30 year old DE a new contract and giving his job to a generally unproven younger player.  The salary cap forces teams to make these decisions.  I just stated that Jenkins would be missed - just like he was last year in games he was out.

And I see Clay Matthews has only 3 sacks half way through the season and your leading sacker is a MLB. 

Another factor contributing to your defense's problems  could be that your offense is putting up so many points so quickly that your opponents are abandoning the run earlier and passing more frequently.  May also explain all the picks your DBs are getting.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 11, 2011, 06:15:29 am
I heard discussed that Cutler's sub 60% completion percentage is ranked 24th in the league.  But the Bears lead the league (yay, we win!) in drops.  If Cutler's receivers only dropped the league average of passes, his ranking in now 10th.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 11, 2011, 07:40:35 am
I heard discussed that Cutler's sub 60% completion percentage is ranked 24th in the league.  But the Bears lead the league (yay, we win!) in drops.  If Cutler's receivers only dropped the league average of passes, his ranking in now 10th.

Good point. RoyBoy and Sanz being the chief offenders this year. but it seems like every year for the past few years our WRs as a group have been up toward the top of the list in drops relative to other teams.

Which tells me that either we've been keeping a lot of WRs on our roster who really don't belong on an NFL team, or our WR coach isn't doing his job.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 11, 2011, 08:32:48 am
....or it could be the type of throw Cutler delivers. Some QBs are more difficult to catch than others, although I havent seen those rifle throws from Cutler. He seems to throw a very catchable ball.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 11, 2011, 09:17:55 am

I told you when we lost Olsen and signed Williams that our team would be one of the league leaders in dropped passes, especially if Hester continued to start along with Kellen Davis.  In fact,  Hester was among the league leaders in drops from last year yet the Bears actually weren't that bad overral as a team.

This year we haven't had Bennett in the lineup much and his replacement, Sanzenbacher has been dropping almost a pass a game. 

I think the Bears wide receivers have underachieved this first half and expect much better play from now on especially with Bennett back and Cutler now seems to be looking Roy William's way more and more.   And Knox has been way too quiet.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 11, 2011, 09:42:11 am
Unless Knox really picks it up from here on out, it wouldn't surprise me to see him get moved at the end of this season.

It looks like he's maxed out as a WR (if not even regressed a bit), and with the new kickoff rule his value as a returner is much less than previously.

Right now Johnny Knox doesn't appear to be a real favorite of either Martz or Cutler and for a Bears WR that's a bad place to be.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 11, 2011, 10:48:55 am
Gabe's gonna finish his rookie season on IR, just watch.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chi-bears-carimi-will-have-knee-surgery-20111111,0,5017451.story

The difference being, as opposed to Chris Williams and Marc Colombo, this time we can actually afford to redshirt him and let him heal right.

It just makes you wonder if he's gonna be one of those guys that plays great when he's healthy but can only ever give you 4 or 5 games a season and will be out of the league before he's 30.

Just pray that Lance Louis stays healthy, otherwise we're back to OMG at RT and we all know what that means.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 11, 2011, 11:19:15 am
If we do IR Carimi then we should bring up Levi Horn from the PS.

We already know what we have in Omiyale and it ain't enough.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 11, 2011, 12:43:08 pm
Even making him inactive would be reason enough to activate Horn wouldnt it? Is Horn just on the practice squad and requiring someone to be deactivated or cut?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 11, 2011, 01:43:57 pm
At this point somone has to take that job away form Mr. Louis. No gimmes for the rook.  I've never been a great judge of whats good/great play in the lines, but even I can see Cutler is standing up alot more than he has, and most of Forte's monster runs have been......to the right. That job is his. Period.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 11, 2011, 02:00:04 pm
I agree, Lance Louis has earned a starter's spot.

Whether that means he stays at RT or he goes back inside eventually remains to be seen but he is clearly one of the 5 best O-Linemen on this team and that would be the case even if Carimi were 100%.

I have a feeling that if Carimi doesn't rebound damn quick from this surgery, he is going to be IR'd... in which case Louis has the RT spot to himself for the rest of this year, at least.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 11, 2011, 02:14:15 pm
I don't want to take anything away from Louis.  His job after being thrown in at RT has been amazing.  He's got great feet and you can see him get knocked off balance and recover quickly.  And I haven't seen that mean streak since Columbo was playing tackle for the Bears.  So far Louis' short arms haven't really been a hindrance because he's so quick.

BUT, a lot of the credit that's been given to our Oline recently should go to Martz/Tice's formations.  We really didn't leave our tackles alone on an island a lot Monday.  A few times they were left one and one and did the job, but more times than not they had help from one or 2 TEs and/or Forte/Klutts.

I know we are all wondering whether Louis is better than Carimi.  But we also have to ask is Louis better than Spencer at RG.  I'm not seeing a bunch of holes up the middle - just a lot of yardage around the ends with guards pulling.

Once Carimi is healthy we'll have, as the papers recently stated, a good problem on the o-line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 11, 2011, 02:28:44 pm
Louis at RG and Carimi at RT give us a whole lot of big, young and nasty on the right side.  I'm liking those prospects a lot. Just not sure anymore if that will be a reality this year.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 11, 2011, 03:48:36 pm
I can understand not giving a 30 year old DE a new contract and giving his job to a generally unproven younger player.  The salary cap forces teams to make these decisions.  I just stated that Jenkins would be missed - just like he was last year in games he was out.

And I see Clay Matthews has only 3 sacks half way through the season and your leading sacker is a MLB. 

Another factor contributing to your defense's problems  could be that your offense is putting up so many points so quickly that your opponents are abandoning the run earlier and passing more frequently.  May also explain all the picks your DBs are getting.

I agree 100% with the points that you make.  I would add one other point, though: last year when Jenkins was out with an injury Neal was also out of the line-up with an injury.  It's my hope that when Neal is in the line-up he can correct the loss of Jenkins.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on November 11, 2011, 05:01:00 pm

 Would you trade a fourth rounder for BRANDON MARSHALL?

 Knowing the Cutler to Marshall connection at Denver and all.  8)  ???
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 11, 2011, 05:36:21 pm
Yes, but that cant happen during the rest of the season. Trading deadline has passed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on November 11, 2011, 06:13:50 pm
Yes, but that cant happen during the rest of the season. Trading deadline has passed.

 What about next year?

 Would an Earl Bennett and Brandon Marshall look more feasible then anything having to do with Roy Williams?

 Yes or No?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 11, 2011, 07:16:03 pm
The Brandon Marshall that played in Denver would be sweet next year. The Brandon Marshall playing in Miami wouldnt. And Yes I would invest a 4th on him in Aprils draft and send Elroy packing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 11, 2011, 07:29:01 pm
Brandon Marshall has put up some decent numbers a few games even with the terrible Miami offense. 

I don;t know that we need Marshall but we do need a big WR that can actually catch the ball.  Roy Williams and his drops are pissing me the **** off!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on November 11, 2011, 07:50:15 pm

 Lets look at who Cutler has really had success with ... 2 WR's.

 One is on the team from Vanderbilt and the other is a sometime performer with Miami.

 The only reason he is a sometime performer with Miami is Cutler is not there to throw him the ball.

 The beauty of a Bennett/Marshall tandom is that it makes you salvitate.  :D

 You know where this could lead to ...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 11, 2011, 09:04:05 pm
yes,yes i do. you wearing a drool cup.  Stop drooling.  Bears need to win Sunday.  need to keep all healthy too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on November 12, 2011, 10:51:40 am
William's is big and can get the separation, but he just needs to hang on to the ball.

I will be big time surprised if we lose this weekend.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on November 12, 2011, 10:56:04 am
The Lions being a dome team has it made the rest of the way, with the exception of finishing up in Green Bay. Although, you're then playing a team that's made the playoffs for some weeks by then and will most likely be resting guys. I doubt Green Bay rest's anyone for our game..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on November 12, 2011, 08:16:46 pm
I wouldn't be suprised by us losing this game.  We are coming off a short week, while Detriot has had a bye week (I believe that is correct).  We have been getting lots of media love which is usually when we faulter.  If this were a road game I would definitely give us an L.  Since its at Soldier Field I believe we have a shot at the win.  I would expect a really pumped up crowd.

Hopefully the same Bears that showed up Monday night, show up again this weekend.  We have been Jeckel and Hyde under Lovie's reign.  Here's to hoping we remain consistant.

BTW...I think we still have shot at playoffs if we lose this game...just need more to go our way down the line.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 13, 2011, 02:23:32 am
Defensively, with Best out Bears will make someone not named Calvin Johnson beat them.  Tillman will be assigned to him.

Offensively, the Lions are kind of like the Eagles.  Good pass rushers but not very good run defense.  Expect to see similar schemes Sunday again.   And look for Knox DEEP!

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on November 13, 2011, 02:25:09 am
yes,yes i do. you wearing a drool cup.  Stop drooling.  Bears need to win Sunday.  need to keep all healthy too.

 You think I'm wrong concerning the future?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 13, 2011, 06:20:58 am
I really don't see this as a close game, and I guess that is my navy and orange colored glasses.  I think we get up on the Lions early and put a real butt whoopin' on them.

I think we will establish the run and Cutler will be on fire.  We win this game by 2 scores, and no, not 2 field goals...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 13, 2011, 11:07:49 am
jj seriously?  No. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 13, 2011, 11:24:32 am
It is forecast to be extremely windy in Chicago today (gust up to 45 mph), which will make any pass over about 15 yards an adventure as well as kicking and punting.

To the extent that the Lions are an indoor team that is currently having issues with their run game, has a gimpy PK and a new punter, that has to work in our favor I think.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 13, 2011, 12:10:11 pm
One would hope so.

Also Hester is playing today.  He has flu like symptons and will only be returning kicks and punts.  No WR duty.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 13, 2011, 01:55:39 pm
I hope Hester responds to the flu like Michael Jordan did...

The extremely windy conditions could set Hester up for some big plays if he's healthy enough to take advantage.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 13, 2011, 07:16:40 pm
The only thing missing from this butt whooping was a blow up block to Fairley or Suh.  I hope Fairey is reading this... you are a major wuss.  Late hit, drive the QB into the turf.  Charles Martin is smiling down on you.  But Jay gets up.  Collect your paycheck and go away now...

Did I say this would not be a close game?  Not saying, don't want to pat myself on the back... just saying.  The Lions had this coming and so be it.  And tomorrow, who wants to bet that Peter King has the Lions 7 and the Bears 8?  Pack, feel the breath?  Getting hotter!  coming for you....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on November 13, 2011, 11:39:21 pm
I said it wasn't going to be a close game as well.  Wish they would've hung 50 on those losers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 14, 2011, 06:26:02 am
What is this team?  Talent?  Coaching?  Chemistry?

To criticize Smith and gang, means Angelo has stocked the cabinet well.  To criticize Angelo means that Smith and gang are outstanding coaches, coaching a pile of refuse into a consistent winner?

Interesting...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 14, 2011, 06:28:02 am
Looking ahead, I really want to see Cutler light up the Chargers and Rivers.  Their jawing when Cutler was with the Broncos has been shown quite a bit in the past.  I don't think there is a lot of love lost there, going back to their SEC days.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 14, 2011, 06:49:11 am
Rivers is from the ACC but I would love to see us pound them.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 14, 2011, 08:08:39 am
Wish they would've hung 50 on those losers.

Totally agree.  And BTW it's time to put a bounty on Suh. First OL to take out his knees for the season (or longer) gets a $500K bonus and any fines or suspensions paid.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on November 14, 2011, 09:55:37 am
Fairly too
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 14, 2011, 10:00:36 am
Yup.  If the refs aren't going to keep those goons in check then it's up to the players to do it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 14, 2011, 10:02:22 am
I think you can chalk up Fairley's play as a rookie mistake.  He hasn't played much this season and may not be familiar with the rules.

As for Suh, he is just one violent dude.  I give Spencer a bunch of credit for lining up against him the entire game.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 14, 2011, 10:08:34 am
I don't give Fairley a pass.  That was total BS.  Hitting him would of been fine, but he drove him into the ground on his throwing shoulder and drove his helmet into Cutlers chin.

It was no accident.  Their dooshbag coach teaches them to try and take out the other teams players.

Remember when Haynesworth was a Titan and stepped on some guys face?  Schwartz was his coach.

This guy is todays version of Forrest Gregg. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 14, 2011, 10:12:04 am
As for Suh, he is just one violent dude.  I give Spencer a bunch of credit for lining up against him the entire game.

I wouldn't be surprised if Chris Williams' wrist injury happened against Suh. Not saying Suh intentionally broke his wrist but he supposedly is the strongest D-Lineman to come into the league since Reggie White and with Williams being somewhat injury prone already it could have gone down that way.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 14, 2011, 12:38:24 pm
I think Paea had the bench rep record.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 14, 2011, 01:00:33 pm
The Tribune says Chris Williams hurt his wrist trying to break his fall on a play. So it wasn't really a contact injury at all.

And he's officially been IR'd.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-line-must-regroup-after-williams-placed-on-ir-20111114,0,7931006.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 14, 2011, 01:18:36 pm
What is this team?  Talent?  Coaching?  Chemistry?

To criticize Smith and gang, means Angelo has stocked the cabinet well.  To criticize Angelo means that Smith and gang are outstanding coaches, coaching a pile of refuse into a consistent winner?

Interesting...

Very good post.  I have wondered the same thing.  After the improvement over this season I am inclined to say both Angelo and Lovies' staff are looking good, watching the big team improvement.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 14, 2011, 02:01:14 pm
I think the biggest beef most folks have with Angelo is he blew a lot of early round picks on guys who couldn't play, didn't fit or had an injury history.

He also seems to ignore glaring holes or weak spots for an extended period of time and stockpile guys at other positions.
I understand taking value but sometimes it appears that holes that are obvious to us aren't so obvious to JA.

He is better than average at finding guys in the later rounds and JAG FA's that can come in and fill roles well.

He has had to pay a premium for a number of FA's since he has been here because the guys he picks either aren't that good or aren't coached that well.


As for the coaches, they seem to be like 3 games behind or something at times. It should have taken Martz exactly 1 quarter of football to resort to last season's playcalling  instead of 3 games once he realized these stiffs that Tice has thrown together aren't in pro-bowl form yet.

It took us how many years to decide to let our DB's jam WR and jump the slant?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 14, 2011, 02:23:32 pm
There has been an inordinate amount of ego and stubbornness in the Bears coaching ranks and front office.

Anytime you put three former HCs under another HC you can expect that.  Angelo, also, is extraordinarily stubborn, has a gigantic ego and is none too great at talent evaluation besides.

Arrogance and ignorance is a deadly combination and we've seen that too often in Halas Hall during the Lovie regime. 

That all being said...  right now it appears that at last, the coaches are working with each other instead of each trying to drive home their own agendas.  Tice and Martz are collaborating on gameplans that have a fighting chance to succeed with the talent on hand.  Lovie and Marinelli are showing more flexibility with the defensive scheme and personnel deployments (CBs in man coverage, Peppers rushing from the inside, etc).  Etc.  As a result, the coaches are reasonably in sync with each other and mroe importantly, with the players... so things are working.  Anytime an NFL team can string together 4 wins in a row then props are in order regardless of who those wins came against, because that's not easily done.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 14, 2011, 02:29:34 pm
PFT is reporting that the Bears have cut Nick Reed and signed DE Chauncey Davis.

That surprises me and is rather disappointing as I really liked Reed's motor.  Who the eff is Chauncey Davis?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 14, 2011, 03:23:46 pm

Doesn't surprise me as Reed has been getting overpowered ever since the first game of the season.   He's just too small to play a 4-3 end.  And  #96 (Addison?) didn't impress me much yesterday but its too early. 

What I want to know is where the heck is Corey Wooten?  Bears need him to get on the field.

Yesterday, I saw Melton and Okoye playing DE giving Idonijie and Peppers much needed breaks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 14, 2011, 03:29:02 pm
I saw Wootton in some of the sideline shots during the game yesterday. Hard to miss...  he was the only guy not in pads who was as tall as Peppers!

But yeah I'm wondering what's up with him.  I mean it's getting to the point where we've either gotta play him pretty soon or just acknowldege his season is lost and put him on IR. Right now he's just wasting a roster spot that could/should be going to the OL.

As far as Chancey Davis... according to NFL.com he's a 28-year-old vet from Florida State who played his whole career up till now with the Falcons. In 6 seasons with the Falcons he had 10 sacks, 5 passes defended and 2 INTs of which he returned one for a TD. He also recovered a fumble for another TD.  He has not missed a game in his career although he has only been a sporadic starter.  At 6'2, 271 he's basically a plus-sized LB vs. a true DE, but he clearly has some playmaking ability and he comes from a franchise that has notched a lot of wins during his time there.  Marinelli must have taken a fancy to him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 14, 2011, 04:08:25 pm

He's big enough plus he's got a lot of NFL experience ...and right now look to be our 3rd option at DE ahead of Addison and Wooten. 

Looks like he was a late cut before the season started.

Any announcement on the Chris Williams roster spot ?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 14, 2011, 04:13:34 pm
I wouldn't be surprised if the signing of Chauncey Davis means Wootton goes on IR.

Right now Peppers and Izzy are the only DEs with enough bulk to stand up against the run and Marinelli really needs 3.

Plus, if Davis has some outside rush skills that could allow us to see more of Peppers inside, where he was very effective yesterday...  although with his knee already gimpy I would be very selective about exposing him to too much action inside where things get very nasty.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 14, 2011, 04:29:19 pm
I noticed Peppers is still wearing a brace.  He is wearing it under his uniform so it is not real noticeable but if you look you can see it.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 14, 2011, 04:41:11 pm
That's what sucks about basically having to win-out to have a chance at the playoffs.

We really can't afford to rest Peppers for a game or two but on the other hand, if we do get to the playoffs, when we really need him will he have anything left?

A couple more blowout victories like yesterday where we could rest him for at least the final quarter, would be a huge blessing in that regard. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 14, 2011, 04:52:13 pm
CHARGERS
@ Raiders
CHIEFS
@ Broncos
SEAHAWKS
@ Packers
@ Vikings

I only see the Bears losing 2 maybe 3 times the rest of the regular season.  That puts them at 10-6 or 11-5.  That will get them a wildcard spot.  What would be sweet is if the Packers start losing games beginning tonight.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on November 14, 2011, 05:13:26 pm
Should only lose to the Packers, and the Raiders can surprise at times.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 14, 2011, 05:17:52 pm
Watch the Bears get Tebowed.  It would figure. Charger/Bears?  I wouldn't say Rivers and Cutler hate each other per se.........but its close.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 14, 2011, 05:24:56 pm

We have to win ONE game...the game next week.

And I doubt the Bears have given up on the division crown just yet...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 14, 2011, 05:45:17 pm
The Chiefs have been playing pretty well at times but just read they lost Cassel for the year so they are done.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 14, 2011, 05:47:37 pm
Raiders, Packers and Chargers are probably the three most dangerous teams.

We should beat the Chargers at home.  The Raiders game will be tough.  It is on the road and that place can get crazy.  The Bears have not shown they can handle the loud stadiums yet.

Unless something terrible happens with injuries the Bears will at the very least be a wildcard team IMO.  Once you are in anything can happen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on November 14, 2011, 06:04:31 pm
1.  Chargers have a slew of injuries, unless some return.  they are playing poorly and have lost 4 in a row.
     The formula is to stop Vincent jackson and Antonio Gates. 
2.  Raiders have multiple personality.  They have been horrible against the run.
     But they have good backs and fast receivers.
3.  Denver, please no......that would be a horrible loss.
4.  KC has played well 3-4 games but really isn't very good.

We SHOULD win the next 4.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 14, 2011, 06:51:06 pm
Chicago - The Chicago Bears and Detroit Lions engaged in a fistfight Sunday afternoon that would make the legions of former Black and Blue Division players proud.

But as even the knockout-seeking Dick Butkus would concede, it doesn't mean much to brawl all afternoon and go home a loser on the scoreboard.

The Bears did not forget that Sunday afternoon at Soldier Field and after going toe-to-toe with the Lions in a contest that threatened to break out into a hockey game, Chicago tossed Detroit, 37-13.

The victory was yet another sign of the Bears' revival following a 2-3 start. Their fourth straight victory tied them with the Lions for second place in the NFC North at 6-3 and at least put them in sight of the 8-0 Green Bay Packers with momentum on their side.

"I think when you win four games in a row, I guess you could say that." Bears coach Lovie Smith said. "We're feeling pretty good about the progress we've made as much as anything. As you can see, there's a lot of room for improvement still."

The loss was Detroit's first on the road and first in the division. It was shocking given their blowout victory at Denver two weeks ago and the layoff they had coming into this game because of the bye week.

If there were a script the Bears would write for victory, this game would have followed it as well as any.

The defense forced six turnovers, including a pair of interceptions returned for touchdowns. Punt returner Devin Hester expanded his all-time lead for combined kick return touchdowns with his 17th, an 82-yard punt return that extended the Bears' lead to 20-0 just a little less than a minute into the second quarter.

Finally, the Bears offense didn't turn the ball over, held the Lions to two sacks and limited their offensive penalties to a holding that was declined.

"We count on special teams contributing," Smith said. "Defensively, it's not good football unless we take the ball away. Of course, offense, once we get it, we know what we need to do."

The Lions, with no running game to speak of without injured Jahvid Best, went to the air often. They not only were battling the Bears but a 22 mph wind that whipped around Soldier Field like it meant business.

Lions quarterback Matthew Stafford threw the ball 63 times, completing 33 for 329 yards and one touchdown. His downfall was four interceptions that led to 14 Bears points and made it impossible for the Lions to come back in the second half.

Stafford revealed after the game that he had suffered a fractured right index finger in the Denver game two weeks ago, but insisted it was the wind that caused him to misfire.

"We just put ourselves in a tough spot," Stafford said. "We had to come back in the second half and throw the ball, try to get back in the game.

"The wind was throwing the ball around. They had a tough time throwing it; we had a tough time throwing it. It's just part of it."

Bears quarterback Jay Cutler completed just 9 of 19 passes for 123 yards and no touchdowns, but he was hardly needed.

The defense caused fumbles on Detroit's first two possessions, leading to a 30-yard touchdown drive and 37-yard field goal drive. Hester set up another field goal with a 29-yard punt return and then broke off his 82-yarder to give the Bears their commanding 20-point lead.

On the Lions' first two possessions of the second half, the Bears' defense scored, first on safety Major Wright's 24-yard interception return and then on Charles Tillman's 44-yard interception return.

"Every guy was out there hungry and having fun," cornerback Tim Jennings said. "We had a (bead) on the ball and the quarterback. The defensive line got after it. We took advantage of every gift we had out there."

With the Bears ahead, 34-6, the only item of interest was a skirmish that occurred after Stafford grabbed Bears cornerback D.J. Moore around the helmet and threw him on the ground following one of his interceptions. Moore went after Stafford, and scores of players flooded onto the field.

Moore was ejected, but it's likely the Lions will incur a number of fines for their conduct. Rookie Nick Fairley's slam of Cutler and linebacker Lance Briggs' blast on Lions receiver Calvin Johnson will be up for review also.

"I don't think anyone's really going to mess with our defense a lot," Cutler said. "We've got some heavy hitters over there."

The one downside for the Bears was that guard Chris Williams injured his wrist and had surgery on it Sunday night. He will be lost for several weeks at least.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 15, 2011, 08:09:22 am
Of those 4 AFC West teams I see the road game against the Raiders giving us the most matchup problems.

They have gobs of speed at WR, a punishing RB in Michael Bush, a huge and relatively good OL that includes the best O-Lineman of this year's rookie class (Wiesniewski), and a veteran QB in Carson Palmer who can still make the throws and will be much more comfortable in the offense by the time we play them. 

Their DL is pretty decent stout too with Seymour on the inside and Kam Wimberly coming off the edge.  And they are one of the few teams with the speed in the D-Backfield to hang with our deep tandem of Knox and Hester.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 15, 2011, 11:05:14 am

A few weeks ago folks were talking about how horrible the Bears were after losing to some of the elite NFL teams in the league and now we're looking at games we don't play for another month and talking playoffs. 

Playoffs?  Playoffs?

Hopefully the Bears are focusing on San Diego.

Enjoy the journey.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 15, 2011, 11:10:06 am
I do have to say it's a lot more fun to be discussing playoff scenarios than the 2012 draft at this point in the season.

I will be very surprised if we don't drop one of those AFC West games.  Winning them all would have us on an 8-game win streak and I can't remember the last time that happened with a Lovie Smith team (if ever).

The loss of Chris Williams puts the pressure right back where it's been too often the last few years...  on the OL.  That unit more than any other will determine how this next stretch of games plays out, IMO.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 15, 2011, 11:43:15 am

Agreed.  Chris Williams was doing a pretty good job pass blocking and pulling on sweeps.  Not so great drive blocking.  I don't know what to expect from Edwin Williams but it could take some time for Webb and him to develop that much needed chemistry.

I'm still holding out hope that Carimi can get back into the lineup in a couple weeks.

Have the Bears announced who they are moving up from the PS yet?  If not, they are probably looking over the league's PSs and street free agents.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 15, 2011, 11:50:22 am
In the Lions game it seemed like our interior 3 were having a lot of problems. There was a lot of heat coming up the middle on Cutler, and on running plays it seemed like someone (either DL or LB) was always getting through and stuffing the runner for little or no gain.  The holes Forte was getting against the Eagles just weren't there on Sunday.

Now a couple of things, obviously Suh and Fairley are one of the top -- if not the top -- DT tandem in the league, and more than half the game was played with Edwin Williams at LG who as far as I know hasn't taken a live snap all season. With Edwin getting a week of prep with the 1's and San Diego having a not-great (but not awful) DL, I look for our inside 3 to have a better outing this Sunday.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 15, 2011, 11:55:03 am
As for roster moves, right now there are three OL on the Bears PS:

Levi Horn, 6'7 315, T (though I believe has also played OG)

Reggie Stephens, 6'2 325 G

Ricky Henry, 6'4 310 G

But none of them have been moved up as far as I know.

OMG seems to be a waste of a roster spot right now.  I would feel better with Horn as our backup swing T than I would with OMG, to be honest.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 15, 2011, 12:22:19 pm
The Raiders like to run the ball and throw it vertically. Our D usually does well against teams that aren't patient to chip away at us.
If we can keep McFadden from running all over us I like our chances.

SD hasn't been playing their best lately, Rivers seems rattled or something.

the Packers are our biggest test but if their D keeps giving up huge games I like our chances.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on November 15, 2011, 12:29:55 pm
Aaron Wilson of Profootball.scout.com reports the Chicago Bears are trying out offensive lineman Mansfield Wrotto today, according to a league source. Wrotto, 27 tried out for the Dallas Cowboys and the New York Giants last month.

The 6-foot-3, 327-pounder is a former Seahawks fourth-round draft pick from Georgia Tech.

He played for the Buffalo Bills last season.



Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 15, 2011, 02:27:13 pm
Obviously there's a Ruskell connection with Wrotto being an ex-Seahawk, but he may be worth a look.  The OL is about the only unit on the Bills that didn't suck last year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 15, 2011, 03:34:07 pm
Still..........there's gotta be a reason no one kept him. If the kids are good enough for the Bear practice squad, doesn't one of them deserve a shot?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 15, 2011, 03:44:30 pm
If the kids are good enough for the Bear practice squad, doesn't one of them deserve a shot?

Yeah I'm wondering that too. It may be that Tice wants a veteran at this point in the season and with the playoffs [literally] on the line.

I also find it curious that we're looking so intently at interior OL.  Wrotto is an OG as are two of the three OL on our PS.

Given that we have no idea when Carimi will be available again, that one of our starting OTs is a G playing out of position and that Omiyale is flat-out awful at OT, I would think that position would warrant at least as close a look as the interior spots. 

As much as I never thought I'd say it...  right now the guy we can least afford to lose on our entire OL is Webb.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 15, 2011, 04:26:42 pm
As the Offensive line goes,so goes the rest of this season. We can't afford to lose bodies there, like Williams. Hopefully Carimi can come back,go to right guard, and Spencer can move to LG. But we need desperately to keep them healthy and working together. That has been the key to the Bears resurgence so far this year....Tice is working OT to get this unit playing together solidly. I'd give him a definate A for effort!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 15, 2011, 05:09:44 pm
Hopefully Carimi can come back,go to right guard, and Spencer can move to LG.

If they really think Carimi is the future at RT and he's close to 100% they move him to RT.  They've got time now not to rush him back as long as everyone else stays healthy.

The next question is does Louis go to RG or LG.  Maybe they move him to LG just to minimize change somewhat otherwise when Carimi comes back 3 players move.

But right now we got to hope Edwin Williams can hold the fort.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 16, 2011, 07:58:49 am
I was saying way back in the offseason we needed to sign this guy... 

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/16/waters-has-been-a-find-for-patriots/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on November 16, 2011, 08:05:28 am
The Green Bay Packers aren't "your biggest test"...They are better than your bears.

Three wins this year against the bears already.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 16, 2011, 08:49:26 am

But the Bears very well may be the Packers' biggest test...it's a long NFL season - things can change.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 16, 2011, 08:58:42 am
Yes Otto but 2 of those were on last seasons schedule, not this years schedule
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 16, 2011, 10:06:38 am
Still no new OL on our roster.

The fact that we are beating the bushes for a veteran OG tells me the coaches have absolutely no plans for OMG to get back on the field again.  How many million did Angelo pay that stiff again?    ::)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 16, 2011, 10:27:50 am

The reason we are beating the bushes for an O-lineman is because Omiyale is the ONLY healthy backup lineman on the team right now.   Omiyale has had a rough season no doubt, especially when he's had to play domes (at Detroit and at New Orleans).    He was decent against Green Bay in his start but I think he struggled against the Panthers.

It's hard to defend him but I think he is an adequate backup that could play 4 out of the 5 positions on the line.   Recall the bulk of his playing time was before Martz/Tice decided to adjust the blocking schemse to help the tackles out.

Bears know what they have on the PS - they've been seeing it since this summer.   Problem is there are a few teams looking for O-lineman right now too - slim pickings.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 16, 2011, 10:37:45 am
I would say OMG is at best a servicable short term back-up at TWO OL positions... not 4.

IIRC he held his own at LT last year. And we could probably plug him in at RG if absolutely necessary.  But at LG last year he was the worst O-Lineman I have ever seen, and at RT this year he was so abysmal that we moved an undersized Lance Louis out of position to stop the bleeding. 

The bottom line is that we are on the razor's edge right now regarding OL.  If either Webb or Louis go down before Carimi is back 100% we can probably kiss the playoffs goodbye cause our offense won't be doing anything.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 16, 2011, 10:54:52 am
Hester named NFC ST Player of the Week.

2nd time this season IIRC.  Looks to be a shoe-in for the Pro Bowl unless things really go south the rest of the way.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 16, 2011, 12:15:41 pm
LOL...  the Lions punter that kicked to Hester is already gone. 

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/16/another-week-another-lions-punter-ben-graham/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 16, 2011, 01:56:11 pm

Lions should fire their ST's coach - they didn't kick it out of bounds until the 4th punt.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 16, 2011, 02:17:28 pm
The thing about that Hester TD on Sunday that nobody's mentioning is that he had actually muffed the punt, then picked it up, collected himself and it was off to the races.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Eastcoastfan on November 16, 2011, 02:33:26 pm
And we was one step away from two others, even with the flu and a bad ankle.  Incredible!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 16, 2011, 02:52:04 pm
And we was one step away from two others, even with the flu and a bad ankle.  Incredible!

Yup...  I was flashing back hard to that Michael Jordan "flu game" when I saw Hester cross the goal line Sunday.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 16, 2011, 03:49:14 pm
Otts...what happened to the last team to go undefeated in the regular season, the Patsies?? Hmm?? Better watch what you hope for.....


What did the unblemished 16-0 regular season mean?

What did the NFL-record 589 points scored mean?

What did the NFL-record 50 touchdown passes thrown by Tom Brady mean?

What does it all mean if the job isn't completed?

This is something the Patriots had months and months to ponder after their gut-wrenching 17-14 loss to the Giants in Super Bowl XLII



Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on November 16, 2011, 09:47:49 pm
I thought the Hester return for about 40 yards that was called back by penalty was actually better than the TD return.

On the TD he used speed to run around the coverage.  On the other return he ran right through the coverage and was past the defenders before  they could react.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 17, 2011, 05:57:55 am
Sporty - Agreed...  Long season, the last win counts the most.  The Packers sure look sparkly and pretty now.  Temps are getting ready to drop and a running game and defense are going to be important. 

But to the Packers credit, they are the best team out there right now.  But it's November...

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on November 17, 2011, 02:55:16 pm
I hope that the Packers have resolved their defensive comminications and they play as they did at the end of last season and as they did against Minn on Monday.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on November 18, 2011, 07:01:11 am
Nickel cornerback D.J. Moore is expected to miss the game, according to multiple league sources, after he suffered a sprained ankle at the end of Wednesday's practice.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 18, 2011, 08:33:41 am
That sucks about Moore.

I wonder if that makes Corey Graham our nickelback then?

And whatever happened to that other DB named Moore...  who also is really small.  Is he still on the team?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 18, 2011, 09:22:53 am

Corey Graham filled in late last Sunday when DJ Moore was tossed.  But the papers mentioned that they might move Tim Jennings to nickel and let Graham or Zach Bowman play corner.

Since Bears rarely play dime (they like to keep Briggs and Urlacher on the field) this might be a good opportunity to see what Graham and Bowman can do.

Joshua Moore was one of the team's late cuts going into the season - he really didn't fit the mold of the Bears corners.   More of a cover corner that was fast but small.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 18, 2011, 09:36:24 am
Joshua Moore was one of the team's late cuts going into the season - he really didn't fit the mold of the Bears corners.   More of a cover corner that was fast but small.

In other words, yet another Angelo "value" pick that turned out being worthless.  Nice.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 18, 2011, 01:21:45 pm
Not a surprise, but... sh-it:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/18/bears-gabe-carimi-done-for-season/

This is the Columbo fiasco all over again. Even when Angelo drafts the right guy (which Carimi was) it doesn't turn out.  And yet more incompetence from the Bears medical staff who clearly mis-diagnosed the original injury and then dragged their azzes on surgery until it came to this.

Only thing we can hope is that Carimi comes back bigger, stronger and meaner than ever next year and is ready to rock and roll.  And since we've IR'd him then I say we just open the knee up and fix EVERYTHING that needs fixed so we don't go through this again next year.  And do it ASAP... If it gets to February or March and then they do surgery and he misses OTAs I will be beyond pis-sed.

Meanwhile, Levi Horn gets his shot on the active roster and thank goodness he showed something in preseason though hopefully we don't have to use him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 18, 2011, 01:43:12 pm
Looks like Suh has joined the NFL's "protected" class.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/18/fairley-fined-15000-for-roughing-cutler-suh-briggs-peppers-not-fined/

But at least Briggs didn't get nailed. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 18, 2011, 01:46:24 pm
Not good news, but with each week he was out it was appearing more likely.

So Levi Horn moves up from the PS.  Technically, he's taking Chris Williams roster spot.  There's now a new spot open with Carimi going on IR, if I'm not mistaken.

It sounds like the Bears will sign Jordan Black Monday.  Hope so.  A co-worker of mine has known his family for quite some time.  He's from the Dallas area.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 18, 2011, 01:49:37 pm
Is Jordan Black a G or a T?  Bears looked at 2 or 3 OGs this past week but IIRC Black is a T.

Since Lance Louis could slide back inside if needed, it would make sense to load up on OTs, I think.  Anything to keep OMG from getting on the field again. 

Also I read where Ricky Henry has been promoted from the PS so between him and Horn that would fill the spots left by Chris Williams and Carimi.  But I would suspect that if they have Jordan Black in their sights then one of those two guys may be active just for Sunday's game and then give way to Black next week.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 18, 2011, 03:35:18 pm

Black is a 31 year old tackle whose been around the league a bit - he did start 9 games for the Jags last year.

If he's signed Monday then one of the PSers would be sent back - not a done deal.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 18, 2011, 03:41:27 pm
Black sounds like he would be this year's Kevin Shaffer... which isn't a bad thing at all and especially if he can play LT passably because right now we are in serious trouble if we lose Webb.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on November 19, 2011, 12:18:30 am
 Kickin ass and taking names ... fuuuuckin BEARS.

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 19, 2011, 08:44:48 am
Knox is going to play a key role down the stretch before its all said and done.  He's been getting more PT over Williams the past couple of weeks.  Just hasn't shown with more catches.  But as teams continue to scheme to take away Forte (and eventually Bennett), getting the ball downfield to Knox needs to be a priority. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 19, 2011, 09:23:11 am

I've been saying the same thing for a few weeks now and it just hasn't happened.  I don't know what the issue is.  Are teams jamming him off the line?  Or are his patterns off?  Or does Cutler not trust him to make a catch if there is anybody near him?

And we haven't much luck with our TEs either.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 20, 2011, 09:15:10 pm
Every report is saying broken thumb on throwing hand and surgery.  Cutler will miss the rest of the regular season.  Best hope is he is back for playoffs if the Bears even make them now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on November 20, 2011, 09:20:07 pm
Cutler broken thumb on throwing hand.  There goes the season...

It was going good there for awhile.  This was cutler's best game in awhile.

Crap
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 20, 2011, 09:25:34 pm
Well time for Hanie to step up.  I think he can win us enough games to get us in.  I am not sure we can win in the play offs with him though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 20, 2011, 09:27:36 pm
Bears luck.  This **** never happens to the Packers.  Rodgers and his luck just keeps rolling along.  Must of sold his soul to the devil or something.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on November 20, 2011, 09:37:26 pm
It's what I was thinking.  Favre never missed a game ever.  Has Rodgers?

DAAAAMN
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 20, 2011, 09:42:03 pm
http://www.chicagobears.com/multimedia/multimediapopup.asp?mm_file_id=2716&play_clip=Y&rn=6

This post game interview does not look like a guy who has to have surgery on his thumb and is done for the season.  Just saying.

Is someone possibly jumping the gun here?  Nothign has been mentioned officially from the Bears this is all tweets and ****.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 20, 2011, 10:35:15 pm
Hanie's been on the team for 4 years now.  He's stepped in during the most pressure packed circumstances one can imagine.  He knows the system.  The offense certainly will not be as good without Cutler, but it will take everyone else stepping up.  I'm not going to play the "whoa is me.....season is over" card just yet.  7-3 puts them in great position with a favorable schedule down the stretch.  Let's see what happens. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 20, 2011, 10:44:53 pm
Like I said Hanie can get us into the playoffs.  I doubt he can win in them.

I am still not sure this deal is for real.  It has been reported here and there but nothing official at all.  The Bears site just reported Knox was sick and threw up before the game and that Mannelley is hurt and Clutts replaced him.  No word about Cutler at all.  Not even a mention of him being injured.

I am going to hold out hope Cutlers thumb got banged up and someone blew it out of proportion and then the story grew out of control.  Perhaps the Bears aren't denying it because if the Raiders think Jay is not playing they will game plan differently.

Let's hope so anyway.  If Cutlers thumb is all messed up let's hope he can heal up quickly and Hanie can get us enough wins to get us in and Cutler can then take it from there.




Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Chris27 on November 20, 2011, 11:35:52 pm
John Clayton's even reporting it on ESPN and speculating on people like Marc Bulger as a replacement.

I can't imagine them getting into the playoffs with Hanie.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 21, 2011, 12:50:27 am
Saw the game in person. No one there knew he broke anything. He played well the rest of the game. I don't understand this. But they're reporting it all over the place. So yep.....cursed. And of course nothing like this every happens to the Packers. Just us when we get rolling finally.....we're done. Truthfully,there's just no way Hanie gets us anywhere. We all know that whether we're willing to admit it or not.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on November 21, 2011, 01:24:01 am
I feel ya Sportster.  It's going to be an uphill climb for the Bears now.  Hanie hasn't thrown a pass this season and to expect him to keep the offensive machine going will be disappointed.  The offense has averaged at least 31 plus a game the last 5 games.  Praying for the best for the team.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 21, 2011, 06:34:32 am
With Hanie, the Bears should end up 11-5, or 10-6.  Oakland could be a win, Seattle and Minny could be losses.  A win at Oakland this weekend about cinches the playoffs for us.

at Oakland  L

KC  W

at Denver  W

Seattle  W

at GB  L

at Minny  W
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 21, 2011, 06:36:08 am
One thing on the Hanie issue also is that he is mobile, similar to Cutler.  That is probably where the comparisons end.  I can't even remember who that rock is we had back there last year.  Oh yeah, Collins.  Hanie can not be worse...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 21, 2011, 09:07:37 am
Lovie Smith confirmed the thumb's fractured this morning, but didn't say whether he's having surgery or not.  Just said he is seeing specialists.  I think they are going to explore if he can play with this injury before deciding on surgery.  Either way, I feel a lot better about the backup situation than I have in years past.  Hanie has been waiting 4 years for this opportunity.  Let's see what the kid's got before writing off the season. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 21, 2011, 09:10:41 am
With Hanie being a free agent after this year, I think this will probably gaurantee that he's gone after the season.  If he performs well and leads the Bears into the playoffs, then I'm fairly certain he will seek a team with a worse QB situation where he'll have a chance to compete to be the starter.  And if he craps the bed, then the Bears probably are going to go in a different direction for next year's backup.  So Hanie is playing for his NFL future over the next 6 games. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on November 21, 2011, 09:35:51 am
If he can't play his role as a backup - he shouldn't be taking up a spot on the roster - Good Luck Mr. Hanie
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on November 21, 2011, 11:03:21 am
With Hanie, the Bears should end up 11-5, or 10-6.  Oakland could be a win, Seattle and Minny could be losses.  A win at Oakland this weekend about cinches the playoffs for us.

at Oakland  L

KC  W

at Denver  W

Seattle  W

at GB  L

at Minny  W

Can't knock your confidence in the team man!  I'm just not feeling that way until I see what Hanie brings to the table.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 21, 2011, 11:32:53 am
IF our run game, STs and defense (especially pass D) play up to capabilities...  and IF we sustain no more serious injuries, especially on the OL... I think 10-6 with Hanie is still do-able and possibly even 11-5.

I have serious doubts about this Sunday's game in Oakland, and expecting to upset the Pack at Lambeau without Cutler borders on lunacy. But the other 4 games are winnable.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 21, 2011, 12:04:15 pm
Well, it looks like a crappy Monday continues.  It was just announced that Patrick Mannely ruptured his ACL and is done for the season.  This is more significant than it appears as he's been the most consistent long-snapper in the business for 13 years.  Now we have to worry about this on all punts and FG's going forward.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 21, 2011, 12:07:30 pm
Listening to Lovie's press conf. now.  He confirms that Cutler will have surgery.  Doesn't go into details but says "the plan is to get Jay back later this season".
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 21, 2011, 12:07:56 pm
Mannelly is getting to the age where you have to wonder if this is the end of the line for him. To put in all the work in rehab knowing you've got maybe a season or two left in the tank anyway... 

It's a huge loss no question -- and one that I hope doesn't wind up costing us a win -- but assuming Clutts can get it done as the LS, this opens up a roster spot.  I would strongly suggest we fill that spot with an O-Lineman so that Frank Omiyale doesn't have to see extended time on the field this season. 

One thing that really sucks about the Cutler injury is, now he'll miss the Denver game.  I was really looking forward to that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 21, 2011, 12:12:52 pm
Lovie again says definitively "Jay will be back this year".
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on November 21, 2011, 12:14:07 pm
Before the end of the season or playoffs (if they make it) or both.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 21, 2011, 12:16:36 pm
3-3 over the last 6 games is the goal.  10-6 should get them into the playoffs.  The Cowboys and Giants play each other twice.  Giants still have to play the Packers.  Hard to imagine the team that loses that division doing much better than 9-7.  Lions still have the Packers twice and at the Saints.  NFC West is irrelevant as far as the Bears are concerned, and the Falcons are 6-4, still have to play at the Saints, and will lose the tie-breaker to the Bears. 

Hard to see 10-6 not getting them into the playoffs.  Just 3 more wins and hopefully Cutler comes back as Lovie has now definitely said will happen at least 5 times during this press conference. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 21, 2011, 12:20:33 pm
Lovie also said the Bears will definitely pursue another Quarterback to back up Hanie. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on November 21, 2011, 12:22:19 pm
6 to 8 weeks from the sources I've been seeing.  That's when the playoffs begins. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 21, 2011, 12:36:12 pm
Yeah, and Gabe Carimi was only supposed to be out 4 weeks. So consider the source.  If there's a way to mismanage this situation to ensure Cutler comes back much less the player than he was before, be assured the Bears medical staff will find it.  See also Marc Colombo, Mike Brown, Marcus Robinson, Curtis Enis, Dusty Dvoracek, Tommie Harris, etc. etc.

I'm figuring the only way we see Cutler on the field again this season is if we make the playoffs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on November 21, 2011, 12:43:33 pm
I am not counting on Denver to be a slam dunk win for the Bears.  It is in Denver, and my guy Tebow, just wills teams to win. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 21, 2011, 12:45:25 pm
I like what Tebow's about too, but trust me...  if we can keep him in long yardage situations so he has to throw more than about 20 times, we win going away.

Good runners don't give our D problems...  good passers, that's another story.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 21, 2011, 01:32:15 pm
I agree Yapper.  I look at Tebow play and just keep thinking that he is going to play right to the strengths of the Bears defense.  Hard to imagine him running over Urlacher, Peppers, Briggs and company.  I see a lot of 3rd and longs which will make for a Bears shellacking if that's the case.  Who knows though.  I thought the same thing about the Jets defense. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 21, 2011, 01:39:27 pm
Lovie could be stating that Cutler will be returning THIS season to keep the team morale up.   

Nobody knows.



I'd be more worried about the Broncos defense than Tebow.   In fact, I'm more worried about a lot of things more than Tim Tebow.

Bears have just faced Rivers, after facing guys like Brees, Rodgers, Vick, Stafford, and Ryan....I like the Tebow story and all, but get real.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Chris27 on November 21, 2011, 01:59:39 pm
Teams are going to stack the line against Forte so Hanie's going to have to make plays. Consider me unconvinced that he's capable of that.

To me, the Bears will need defensive turnovers and continued great returns to win games. And the inability of the D-line to do much of anything yesterday against a couple of 3rd! string linemen doesn't instill confidence.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 21, 2011, 02:00:56 pm
Broncos D is definitely worthy of attention.

Dumervil and Von Miller are small quick pass rushers that can really bring the heat and could give our OTs some big trouble.

As for the QB thing... Hanie does not have the arm of Cutler (few do), nor is he as mobile.  But he has enough arm, he is competitive, and he is mobile enough, IF Martz will design and call plays that play to his strengths. Hanie is probably a better QB than 6 to 8 teams' starters at this point and that's encouraging.  The question is whether his supporting cast (Forte, OL and WRs) can take it up another level to make his job easier.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 21, 2011, 04:13:48 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-to-sign-long-snapper-laptad-20111121,0,6576334.story

All I can say is, this kid had better be good.  Clutts did just fine against the Chargers, and would have saved us a roster spot we could have used for OL depth. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 21, 2011, 04:27:54 pm
WSCR had a bone and joint specialist on earlier today who shared Lovie's optimism about Cutler's return this season.  Said by all accounts his break seemed fairly routine.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 21, 2011, 04:30:16 pm
Cutler has done a visibly better job taking care of himself this season so I've got to hope that pays off in a speedy recovery.

Based on past history, though, my confidence in the Bears medical staff is very low.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 21, 2011, 04:43:25 pm
Hanie can make some plays.  He is no Cutler but I would argue he is actually more mobile then Cutler and will run more.  He will not win games for us but he won't be Collins bad.

I am worried about him throwing lots of interceptions though.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 21, 2011, 04:55:40 pm
We have got to find ways to make defenses pay for stacking the box and blitzing...  cause make no mistake, Hanie will see a lot of that.

Everyone has seen by now that Jay Cutler is a rare talent. Hanie's physical skills are good, but nowhere near Cutler's.  And he has virtually no game experience. So a lot of the plays Cutler has been pulling out of the fire this year simply aren't gonna get made by Hanie, and we need to adjust our expectations (and our gameplans) accordingly.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 21, 2011, 05:08:54 pm
We had a Corey Wooten sighting this weekend.   Looks like he only has to battle FA Chauncey Davis for playing time as the Bears cut Mario Addison.  Addison looked really bad getting faked out on a play action pass.   Often times undrafted rookie FAs don't get too many opportunities to prove themselves in the NFL.

So now we got a roster spot open for a veteran FA QB...will Martz be going down to Mississippi this week?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 21, 2011, 05:29:15 pm
I think Matt Forte will be very busy this Sunday.  And not just running the ball.  I think Hanie will need to look for Forte as a receiver, at least early on.  After the first quarter, depending on how the Bears are handling the pass rush, we'll see Martz open things up.

I don't think they dumb down the offense much for Hanie.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 21, 2011, 05:47:08 pm
I'd like to see Barber and Forte in the backfield at the same time a few snaps here and there.
Split Forte out wide and see how the D responds.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: wmljohn on November 21, 2011, 06:04:02 pm
Too bad Hanie is a FA after the season.  If he comes in and wins some games and looks half way decent in doing so we could have had some trade bait.  It seems every time a contender has to use a back up and he does well they get paid off with a trade.  Either the starter and keep the back up or trade the back up and keep the starter....

Bears get shhiit....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 21, 2011, 06:47:20 pm
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Who-is-Caleb-Hanie.html

Pretty good article.  I love this guys insight into Bears players since he used to be a part of the Bears organization.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 21, 2011, 07:13:29 pm
Having sucessfully empted the contents of my stomach at the initial thought, and having servived a 15 minute dryheave session, you gotta know that good ole' Brett woud love,love a chance. Play the Vikes, the Pack, I hear that tractor racing to the Hattesburg airport even as I post.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 21, 2011, 07:16:09 pm
Excellent article. Time for Hanie to show who he is.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BillSharp on November 21, 2011, 07:49:21 pm
At the end of pre-season I posted that the Bears should keep Laptad stashed on the practice squad this year - long snappers are valuable.

Always have liked Hanie. He'll show rust against the Raiders, but should improve each week. Hanie needs to run more than Cutler did.

When Martz picked Collins to be the back-up going into the playoffs last year - that's when I realized Martz was nuts.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 21, 2011, 08:25:52 pm
Hanie will run.  When he gets confused and is not sure what to do he will take off.  That is what inexperienced QB's with wheels do.

It will give defenses fits.  He has an NFL caliber arm and can make all the throws.  He can not make the "pull it out of your ass magic, I can't believe he just threaded that needle" throws that Cutler can.  However few QB's can.

He just needs to keep the mistakes to a minimum and the Bears will make it to the playoffs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 21, 2011, 10:22:10 pm
Thankfully we've got a manageable section of our schedule to deal with here. But the Chargers were no slouches and I expect the same from the Raiduhs, Horsies, et al. No game is going to be a cake walk. I like Hanie. I think he CAN win us a game or two....hopefully three. But we cannot get too crazy here. He is definately not even close to Cutler. Cutler's been making so many ridiculous plays to keep drives alive, it's impossible to ask Hanie for the same when he just isn't capable of it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on November 21, 2011, 11:24:27 pm
Thankfully we've got a manageable section of our schedule to deal with here. But the Chargers were no slouches and I expect the same from the Raiduhs, Horsies, et al. No game is going to be a cake walk. I like Hanie. I think he CAN win us a game or two....hopefully three. But we cannot get too crazy here. He is definately not even close to Cutler. Cutler's been making so many ridiculous plays to keep drives alive, it's impossible to ask Hanie for the same when he just isn't capable of it.

 I know who almost got us to a SuperBowl after Cutler went down.

 Dont forget in the past Orton got us to the playoffs with 10 wins as a rookie.

 Grossman came back for CARO in the playoffs. WE LOST.

 If Hanie shows he's got it ... we better let him play on thru.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pistol on November 22, 2011, 01:22:59 am
3-3 will get Da Bears into the playoffs. If the Bears go 3-3, Atl would have to go 5-1 to top us and the Giants would have to go 4-2 to tie and I don't see that happening with their schedule.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BillSharp on November 22, 2011, 03:05:36 am
Hanie doesn't have the glaring flaw.

Enderle is COMPLETELY immobile - bad draft pick.

Collins had no arm strength, along with being old, badly innacurate & immobile.

Most of our back up QBs in the last 20 yrs. have had weak arms.

Hanie can run & has decent arm strength. Too bad he has no experience.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on November 22, 2011, 04:38:33 am
I bet McNabb is waiting anxiously for a phone call
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 22, 2011, 06:41:57 am
Isnt McNabb still on the Vikes roster?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on November 22, 2011, 07:22:47 am
Maybe 3rd string by now
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 22, 2011, 08:53:15 am
That National Football Post article is really good.  Obviously Gabriel is gonna spin Hanie to the positive since Hanie is part of his resume with the Bears, but it's interesting to hear what the thought process was in signing him.

The thing that gives me some confidence is that Martz has already been migrating his offense away from the deep-drop stuff and into a system that gets the QB out of the pocket...  where Cutler is at his best and it sounds like, so is Hanie.  So it's not like we're gonna have to re-tool the whole offense to work with Hanie's skill set.  What we've got for an offense now is kind of this hybrid between the classic Martz scheme and a WCO (complete with fullback!), and it sounds like that's exactly the system in which Hanie has the best chance to succeed.
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 22, 2011, 09:00:24 am

Hanie can run & has decent arm strength. Too bad he has no experience.

He got some experience when Cutler had the concussion last season and in the championship game when Cutler had the MCL.  And now he's going to get a lot more experience with Cutler's latest injury.

I think he's got enough experience these last couple seasons.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 22, 2011, 09:50:48 am
Seriously, I'd rather have our season in the hands of Caleb Hanie than a guy like Tyler Palko.  That guy is brutal.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on November 22, 2011, 09:52:34 am
And he gets a full week to prepare
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 22, 2011, 02:15:03 pm
I dont think it'd be enough if he had 2 weeks to prepare
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 22, 2011, 03:52:41 pm
The Broncos let Kyle Orton go today.

It shouldn't take him long to find a new home.  Arizona, Houston or KC seem the most likely landing spots.

OTOH...  how sweet would it be to have fleeced the Broncos for Cutler, picked up Knox with the pick we got from them...  and get Orton back for basically free in the bargain?

The deal is that we really need to commit to Hanie, while Orton is going to want to go to a team where he can start. So that's gonna put and end to that conversation, I'm thinking.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 22, 2011, 04:08:18 pm
I'd pick up Orton in a NY second
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 22, 2011, 04:15:55 pm
OK, but where does that leave us IF (big if) Cutler comes back yet this season?

At that point Orton is the de facto #3 QB and a very highly paid one at that.  Orton has had enough of holding a clipboard and he'll want a chance to start...  which I just don't see him getting with Hanie in the mix here.  Not to mention, he is not terribly mobile and the way the Martz offense has evolved I see that being a big liability.

To be honest though I really don't think we'll even have a shot at him.  The waiver process goes in order "worst to first" which puts us towards the end of the line for his services at this point.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 22, 2011, 04:28:02 pm
There's also a very real chance Orton could be claimed by the Redskins...  who already have Rex Grossman.

How wierd would that be?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 22, 2011, 04:39:36 pm
Read down at the bottom.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-cutler-to-have-thumb-surgery-wednesday-in-vail-20111122,0,5467361.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 22, 2011, 04:45:42 pm
Orton's knowledge of the Denver defense could come in VERY handy when we play them in a couple weeks.

Just sayin.

Already I'm hearing rumors that Orton's agent was putting the wheels for this in motion as soon as Cutler's injury hit the news.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 22, 2011, 05:52:52 pm
Hope the Chiefs don't pick him up.  I'd much rather face whoever that clown was last night than Orton in 2 weeks.  Plus Orton will be very familar going against Lovie's defense from practicing against it all those years. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 22, 2011, 05:56:42 pm
Cutler will be having surgery in Vail, CO.....uh.......I bet Kobe has some great recommendations for hotels to stay there the night before having surgery. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on November 23, 2011, 12:38:39 am

 The minute I mention Orton in post # 2791 ...  ???
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 23, 2011, 02:28:20 am
I know it's silly to speculate,but think about it....we'd be pretty darned set at QB for awhile with Cutler, Orton and Hanie, all capable QB's and in that order, just right.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on November 23, 2011, 04:54:03 am
Sign Orton for the rest of the year..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on November 23, 2011, 05:40:35 am
The beauty of the Orton situation is that we can wait since our waiver claim is 30, and after us the 49ers and Packers. Would it be worth $2.5 mill for the Pack to claim him and block us?  I think not.

If KC doesn't claim him, we can sign him for the vet minimum, and the Broncos pick up the balance of his $2.5 mill.  If he is there, we should sign him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on November 23, 2011, 07:01:08 am
heh

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Anthony-Adams-leaves-a-special-message-for-sick-;_ylt=AoljB2Cq.4.N2jHkSJn6GF9DubYF?urn=nfl-wp12315

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 23, 2011, 08:05:01 am
A person on another board brought up another very good point.  Based on his time with the Bronocs Orton has a LOT of knowledge of not only the Denver D, but two other teams still on our schedule (Raiders and Chiefs).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 23, 2011, 08:50:28 am
To be honest, I'm not really following Orton's logic in wanting to return to Chicago.

If his intention is to be a starter on a playoff team this year...  well, a lot of things are going to have to happen.

 - First, Hanie would have to either get hurt, or play so badly he is benched.

 - Second, Orton would have to assimilate the Martz offense quickly enough to win Martz' confidence as the next man up for Hanie (over Enderle, who has had half a season in the system).

 - Third, Cutler's recovery would have to take longer than anticipated because the minute he's pronounced good to go, he's back at #1... regardless of whether Hanie or Orton has been starting up till then. 

 - And fourth, the Bears would have to make the playoffs.

Unless ALL FOUR of those conditions play out, Orton coming back to Chicago doesn't make a lot of sense for him. Especially when he could have gone to another (albeit worse) team, won the starting job for the remainder of this season and in doing so, position himself for a longer-term deal with that team (or another one), at starter's money. 

The much more likely scenario if he comes to Chicago is that he backs up Hanie, who gives way to Cutler late in the year, and at that point the best Orton can hope for is to unseat Hanie as our #2 for 2012. Which seems like settling for a lot less PT (and money) than what Orton could be getting elsewhere.   
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 23, 2011, 09:08:57 am
ESPN Chicago is reporting that the Bears have put in the wavier claim for Kyle.  Now we wait and see.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 23, 2011, 09:27:06 am
The only teams behind us in the pecking order are the Niners and the Packers.  But if none of the other teams puts in a claim before 4 PM today, he's ours.

At least that's how I understand it.

There is always a risk of disrupting chemistry when you bring in a veteran QB who was a starter, to be your backup.  And then add to it Orton's prior history with the Bears.  But this is a rather unique situation...  a team in the thick of playoff contention, who has lost their franchise QB possibly for the duration and whose backup is a young player with a lot of potential but very little experience  (in direct contrast to Houston, whose backup QB has enough experience but just isn't very good).  The fact that Lovie said in his Monday presser that we would still be looking to add a veteran QB...  and then the next day Orton becomes available... has to be seen as a lot more than just a happy accident.

This doesn't feel like a situation that could blow up in our face but I have to think it would nonetheless require some very skillful lockerroom diplomacy by Lovie and his staff. Cutler, Hanie and Orton would comprise one of the best -- if not the best -- QB trios in the league but it could also very easily turn into a "three's a crowd" scenario.  Clear communication and expectation management on the part of the coaches will be critical if this deal actually happens. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 23, 2011, 10:39:17 am
PFT just posted a quick rundown of the waiver process...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/23/orton-will-be-awarded-on-waivers-at-400-p-m-et/

So by 3:15 Chicago time we should know if Orton is a Bear again, and we will also know which other teams (if any) made a claim on him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 23, 2011, 10:57:37 am
To be honest, I'm not really following Orton's logic in wanting to return to Chicago.

If his intention is to be a starter on a playoff team this year...  well, a lot of things are going to have to happen.

 - First, Hanie would have to either get hurt, or play so badly he is benched.


Hanie has never started an NFL game...and is now being asked to start 5 or 6 in a row.   Orton probably likes his chances of playing.

 - Second, Orton would have to assimilate the Martz offense quickly enough to win Martz' confidence as the next man up for Hanie (over Enderle, who has had half a season in the system).

Unless Hanie gets hurt or is utterly useless Orton should get a couple three weeks to pickup the offense.  Enough or a veteran QB who has played in several systems - I dunno?

 - Third, Cutler's recovery would have to take longer than anticipated because the minute he's pronounced good to go, he's back at #1... regardless of whether Hanie or Orton has been starting up till then.

And if you've been reading the papers the chances of that happening are 50% at best.  Most say the Bears' timetable for Cutler's return is too aggressive based on the injury suffered.

  - And fourth, the Bears would have to make the playoffs.

The Bears are 30th in the waiver process right now - that pretty much tells you what their chances are for making the playoffs.

Orton is playing for a job next year - his familiarity with Chicago and the questionable situation of Hanie and Cutler are ideal for him.

Unfortunately, I hear rumblings that KC is going to snag Orton.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 23, 2011, 11:04:03 am
Unfortunately, I hear rumblings that KC is going to snag Orton.

That would stink.  Not only to lose out on Orton, but KC with Orton would be a lot tougher draw for the Bears than KC with Palko.

It makes all the sense in the world though for KC.  They still have a chance (albeit slim) to get into the playoffs but Palko is not going to get them there. 

It also makes sense for Orton... a lot more sense long-term than going to Chicago, actually... because Cassell has not met expectations and especially for the money he's making.  If Orton goes to KC and plays well I think he'd have a legitimate shot at booting Cassell and getting a long-term starter's contract down there. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 23, 2011, 03:19:13 pm
It's the Chiefs.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/23/chiefs-claim-kyle-orton-off-waivers/

I hope we beat them 50-0.

And the Bears are back to square one as far as insurance behind Hanie.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 23, 2011, 03:47:39 pm
Apparently the Cowboys had also put in a claim, and they're ahead of us too.

That actually would have been even more infuriating because the Cowboys clearly did it just to keep him away from us, whereas the Chiefs have a legitimate need at the position.

Interesting (or not) that the Colts did not put in a claim.  It's almost like they're trying to lose or something...   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 23, 2011, 04:42:54 pm

Actually, the Cowboys current backup QB John Kitna is having back issues.  He didn't dress for their last game and I'm not sure he'll be ready tomorrow.  Most likely they were looking to cut Kitna with an injury settlement and sign Orton as #2.  #3 is a 3rd year QB Stephen McGee.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 23, 2011, 04:46:17 pm
Kitna...  LOL...  what is that guy, 40 by now?

Of course we had Todd Collins last year so not much we can say there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 23, 2011, 04:54:26 pm

I think the Bears may have been planning for Mannelly's retirement after the season anyway:

It’s a decision the Bears made after Laptad spent two weeks snapping to special teams coordinator Dave Toub before practice last month. The Bears used Laptad as a long snapper in the preseason finale against the Cleveland Browns on Sept. 1 and wanted to see where he was in his development during the season. So, the coach took Laptad out before practice every day. When Mannelly suffered a torn ACL in his left knee last Sunday, the decision to go with the unproven long snapper with a handful of experienced options on the street was made.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on November 23, 2011, 08:12:11 pm
This guy Toub appears to be a wise man...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on November 23, 2011, 08:56:05 pm
I still can't get over how awesome Clutts did long snapping.  That was way better then the time Dez Clark had to do it.  That was a disaster.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 23, 2011, 09:22:47 pm

Clutts, originally was a DE, like Laptad.   I wonder if we can now use Laptad to give Peppers a break...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on November 28, 2011, 11:27:02 am
Chiefs played a very tough game against the Steelers last night.  Probably would have won had they started Orten. 

Not sure what to think of next week.  Last night may have been their big last stand for the season and they may be pretty emotionally flat against the Bears next week.  However, having Orten may give them a bigger boost.  Their defense sure looked tough last night. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 28, 2011, 11:47:33 am
IMO the biggest concerns for the Chiefs game are:

1) Orton starting for them and playing well.

2) Our demonstrated inability to run the ball against 3-4 defenses (Packers, Chargers).

3) Our D letting down after spending way too much time on the field in Oakland?

If those three things happen then we're in bad shape no matter how Hanie plays.  OTOH if we can manage those three things than all Hanie has to do is play passably (i.e., not give the game away in the 1st quarter again).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 29, 2011, 07:59:23 am
Late in the season I know but this guy would be worth putting a waiver claim on...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/29/chiefs-cut-jared-gaither/

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on November 29, 2011, 09:04:01 am

Probably has more long term potential than Omiyale and more experience than Horn.  I'd bet he gets claimed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 29, 2011, 09:29:59 am
Same rules as with Orton.  Maybe having lost on Sunday we've moved up the pecking order a few spots but I still expect Gaither to be claimed by a team well ahead of us.  We're not the only ones hurting for OL help right now by a long shot.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 29, 2011, 01:04:16 pm
Getting brutal to be a Bear, or ex Bear as the case may be:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-waive-specialteams-ace-iwuh-20111129,0,2654535.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 29, 2011, 04:22:25 pm
Hmmm....

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/29/mike-martz-rumored-to-have-interest-in-arizona-state-job/

Much as continuity is to be valued...  the thought of a system better tailored to Cutler... combined with a legit #1 WR...  and our young OL back at full strength in 2012...  is appealing to say the least. 

Mike Tice would be the obvious in-house replacement at OC as he has gradually been morphing the offense into more of his style anyway...  but would we need to bring on a dedicated OL coach to keep him from being spread too thin? 

Another thing to consider...  Norv Turner is very likely going to be looking for employment after this year.  Horrible HC, but OK as an OC.  He certainly knows what Cutler can (and can't) do. And maybe he'd bring Vincent Jackson with him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 29, 2011, 04:55:33 pm
I dunno, that last name "Turner"... ahhhhhh....mmmmm, I duuno.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on November 29, 2011, 06:10:26 pm
We won't miss the Martz - Mrs Doubtfire...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on November 29, 2011, 11:04:03 pm
So with all the success GB's coaches have had,why no interest in them? I think it's BS that our coaches get jumped on immediately with ANY success and yet theirs can go years with nothing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 30, 2011, 08:11:00 am
Someone also brought up the name of Jeremy Bates, who was Cutler's QB coach in Denver and the OC at Seattle.

But IIRC he turned us down before we hired Martz so I don't know that the results would be any different if we asked him again.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on November 30, 2011, 08:19:09 am
Sportster, I doubt GB lets us interview any of their coaches.
Teams don't have to allow folks to interview for other jobs if they are under contract.
Lovie has allowed it for promotions but I think someone wanted to interview Tice and he said no and made him an asst head coach or something.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 30, 2011, 08:29:16 am
I think it's interesting that in the comments to the Tribune article about Martz going to ASU, the sentiments run about 10 to 1 to the side of "good riddance".

Granted you always need to be careful what you wish for, but I think most Bears fans realize we have the makings a darn good offense.

- An elite QB (yes Cutler is whether people want to admit that or not)
- A Pro Bowl dual threat RB in Forte and a solid #2 in Barber
- An OL that is still a work in progress but is coming together and could be a Top 15 unit with the addition of one great interior player
- A terrific possession-plus WR (Bennett) and a legitimate (though inconsistent) deep threat in Johnny Knox

The obvious gaping holes being a #1 WR...  and possibly a seam-busting TE.  But the majority of pieces are in place. 

With that in mind, the inconsistent play of our offense (and downright failure in critical games like the last 3 Packers matchups and the Saints game this year) has to be largely hung on the OC.  It seems like for most of his tenure here, Martz has had to be begged, bribed and threatened to do the right thing by our personnel.  He has also struggled mightily when faced with 3-4 defenses and/or big, physical DB play. With a #1 WR and a veteran OC that knows how to use our personnel's strengths and protect their weaknesses, we can be a Top 10 offense in this league.  Not Packers, Saints or Patriots good, but competitive.  Upgrading Martz gets us half the way there.


Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on November 30, 2011, 01:59:07 pm
I will not be sorry to see Martz go, the quicker the better
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on November 30, 2011, 02:14:27 pm
Would love to see the Bears get someone to run the Green Bay offense.  In a sense it's like the Bears defense.  A limited number of plays, just very well executed....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 30, 2011, 05:00:02 pm
A limited number of plays, just very well executed....

Having ridiculous talent and depth at QB and WR doesn't hurt either.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: stelz on November 30, 2011, 05:29:04 pm
Not to mention their continuityon O, having run the same system since before dirt.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on November 30, 2011, 05:58:03 pm

 Just a bit perplexed ... did Martz help get us to 11-5 last year?

 In both situations where I guess Martz sucuuks ... isnt that without Cutler?

 After one start with Hanie he doesnt know what he's doing?

 Who would replace Martz?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 30, 2011, 07:10:36 pm
PFT is reporting that Broncos' stud D rookie Von Miller has undergone thumb surgery and may miss this Sunday's game against the Vikings.

Considering we have the Broncos a week from Sunday, gotta hope those issues linger another week.  Hanie and Forte will have a much easier time of it if Miller isn't in the backfield every second play.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 30, 2011, 07:16:02 pm
After one start with Hanie he doesnt know what he's doing?

Actually there are three consecutive losses to the Packers that say Martz doesn't know what he's doing.  All of which our D played well enough for us to win but the O didn't carry their weight. As well as a blowout loss to the Saints earlier this year where our O looked outclassed and unprepared. And the fact that Cutler has aged about 5 seasons in less than two because of all the punishment he's taken. 

In his very limited contact with the Chicago media, his coaching from the booth instead of on the field, etc., it seems clear that Martz is distancing himself from the Bears players and organization, who he seems to regard at a level somewhere between apathy and contempt. I believe Martz wants to be done with the Bears, and that the feeling is mutual. The ASU situation would present an easy out with all sides saving face.

Who would replace Martz?

Mike Tice, Jeremy Bates, Norv Turner are three names that I've put out there just on my own.  Angelo, Ruskell and Phillips are definitely going to scare off some of the big-name OCs but I've got to think the chance to work with Cutler and Forte would be a pretty big plum for some decent offensive minds even if our WR and TE positions are a bit lacking.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 30, 2011, 07:42:02 pm
So much for getting Jared Gaither off waivers.  He's a Charger now.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/30/chargers-shut-down-marcus-mcneill-claim-jared-gaither/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on November 30, 2011, 08:05:54 pm
Sooo.....Martz has to leave then? For the new Yob? When? Tice I think would be just swell.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on November 30, 2011, 08:14:28 pm
I expect that Martz will finish out the season regardless... and then leave, regardless.  He declined a contract extension earlier this year (so he won't be staying any longer), and the McCaskeys won't buy him out (so he won't be leaving any sooner).

Whether he winds up at ASU or rides back into the sunset (or TV), his run with the Bears is coming to an end.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 09:05:12 am
Geez Martz, really?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/30/martz-blames-players-for-execution-issues/

Yes, that play was not executed well.  In particular, whoever was supposed to block Aaron Curry failed miserably, and Hanie should have thrown the ball away instead of trying to force the completion.

Which still doesn't mean it wasn't a terrible call...  an overly complicated play with a low probability of success, when we were having good success on the ground...  and all at a critical point in the game. For Martz not to man-up and own his share of the blame on that is chickensh*t, plain and simple.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 01, 2011, 10:16:04 am
He's done that in the past - saying stuff like "Maybe I gave them too much to handle with my supergenious playcalling..."
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 10:21:12 am
Interesting how Jay Cutler is now starting to call Martz out in the media.  He wouldn't have been that bold last year and I think that indicates two things:

1) Cutler has assumed leadership of this team (or at least the offense) and is no longer hesitant to stand up for his teammates and demanding that our coaches start putting them in a better position to succeed.

2) Martz will not be the Bears OC next year under any circumstances; Cutler knows this and will be increasingly vocal in his criticism of Martz from here on out with no fear of reprisal. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 01, 2011, 10:50:22 am
My guess is Martz is gone next year and they promote Tice to OC. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 11:09:09 am
So if Tice goes to OC, who becomes our OL coach?

Russ Grimm is one of the big names that comes to mind, but the Cardinals haven't exactly been known for stellar OL play, so maybe not.

I wonder if we could reunite Carimi with his OL coach from the U of Wisconsin?  The Badgers always have killer OLs and have been sending a lot of O-Linemen to the pros lately. 

Whoever we'd take, that would be a very critical hire.  The OL has been coming together but there is still a lot of work to be done and I would hate to see them regress.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 01, 2011, 11:10:59 am
Aside from last week's game with an inexperienced QB I think Martz' playcalling has been sound, especially when you consider the injuries on the O-line and the Bears most consistent WR being injured.

He does have these lapses where he goes pass happy, like the beginning of both 2010 and 2011 seasons and the Packer finale last season.

Offense is now 16th in the league...6th in points.   Interceptions were also way down from last year too (aside from last Sunday).

My issue with Martz, aside from his lapses of going pass crazy,  is he seems to like the intermediate throw too much...the 15 to 20 yarder....and doesn't often throw short and let the receiver run after the catch.  Also rarely throws the deep ball.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 11:12:15 am
And also, what happened to the screen passes?

I remember earlier in the season, we had a game or two where Forte was just killing defenses on the screen.  Then Martz put those plays back in mothballs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 01, 2011, 11:41:01 am

Forte went nowhere with a couple screens against the Raiders.  Teams are waiting on it - just like they are ready for our student body right sweeps.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on December 01, 2011, 11:44:42 am
Got to thinking Cutler's recovery may take longer than shorter in that 3-10 week window he described.  A lot will depend a lot on how well controlled his blood sugar is.  In diabetics, uncontrolled blood sugar can cause slower healing of wounds, which require a rich supply of oxygenated blood.  The excess sugar can interfere with the oxygenation and cause the wound to heal slower.  Hopefully he is all over monitoring his sugars.  My wife is diabetic and she has to watch hers like a hawk to control side effects.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 12:05:52 pm
BearFan, good points.

The fact that Cutler chose his own indepedent surgeon to do the procedure (vs. the one the Bears have on retainer), tells me he is treating this injury as if his career depended on it.  Which realistically, it does.  So I can't imagine him doing (or not doing) anything that would jeopardize a 100% recovery.

I noticed in the press yesterday him very wisely making no public commitment as to when he'd be back. And honestly, I would rather have him back at 100% next season than to rush back this year and do something that permanently screws up his ability to throw.  Even if it means we play Hanie to the end of the season, lose one too many games and miss the playoffs.

That opinion may put me in the minority but I really think this requires a long-term view.  With two young O-Lineman coming back healthy next year (presumably), a true #1 WR added in the offseason (hopefully) and a new OC (almost certainly), there is a chance for this offense to make some real noise next year.  I would hate to go into that situation with questions at QB because we botched the handling of Cutler's injury these next few weeks.   

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 01, 2011, 12:34:03 pm
I was thinking the same thing about Cutler picking a surgeon NOT affiliated with the Bears.  Excellent choice Jay.  Getting back with the ex, maybe yes, maybe no.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 12:52:50 pm
Getting back with the ex, maybe yes, maybe no.

Kristin is hot enough but Cutler was a lot better football player when he wasn't banging her.

Guess we'll have to wait awhile to find out though, now. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on December 01, 2011, 01:19:44 pm
Will McNabb be our next option for QB depth?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on December 01, 2011, 01:33:05 pm
I sure hope so!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 01:42:36 pm
Wow...  Based on what I saw with the Vikings I'm not sure he's physically capable of throwing a pass beyond 15 yards with any accuracy at all anymore.

But...  hometown boy...  lots of playoff experience in cold weather... and he would be highly motivated to make a return trip to the playoffs in what is very likely his last NFL season.   

I'm pretty sure he won't last past the Cowboys in the waiver process.  But if he does he would be a clear improvement over McCown if for no other reason than he has actually taken NFL snaps under live fire this season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 02:05:12 pm
McNabb has been a West Coast Offense QB for his entire career and as such, is just about the worst possible fit for Martz' offense. If we bounce McCown (who has played for Martz) and bring in McNabb, it would almost certainly be over the objections of Mad Mike. 

OTOH...  there has always been a very strong base of support for McNabb among Bears fans, and it has been widely speculated throughout McNabb's career that the Bears were always who he had wanted to play for in his heart of hearts.

Having him end his NFL career as a Bear (and possibly facing the Vikings in the season finale) would certainly be a compelling storyline...  but I hope that any decision that's made on him is based on a realistic assessment of his current football skills and not hometown sentimentalism.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 03:07:10 pm
Think this might have had something to do with those 2nd-half Vikings collapses early in the season?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/01/mcnabb-reportedly-out-of-shape-in-minnesota/

Anyone with eyes could see that McNabb was at least 20 lbs overweight in those Vikings games, and that his throwing got markedly worse as the games wore on.  He simply could not finish, and the rest of the team followed suit.

I'm not quite saying he's the Albert Haynesworth of QBs but it's something to keep in mind.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 01, 2011, 03:08:02 pm
I never understood all the flak the guy got.  Seem always to leave it all on the field, why are people bagging on him?  He got booed when he was drafted for God's sake! Did he **** everone off he worked with/for?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 03:10:49 pm
I always thought the guy got a bad rap too.  I thought it was disgraceful how he was treated in Philly while we Chicago fans endured the likes of Cade McClown and Shame Matthews.

That all being said...  there gets a point in every player's career where as much as you may pull for the guy, he can't play anymore. His body is simply used up.  Most NFL observers whose opinions I put in any stock in... as well as my own eyes... say McNabb has reached that point.

The other thing is that whoever is granted the claim will assume McNabb's contract... which, IIRC, is substantial. Assuming the Bears have any designs on McNabb, I suspect they will not put in a claim and see if he will clears waivers. In which case he becomes a free agent and and that point they would approach him with a contract that may not be for much more than the veteran minimum, pro-rated out to the end of the season as I can't see any way he would figure into our plans any further out than that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 01, 2011, 05:10:41 pm
The Dolphins have waived Sage Rosenfels.

I expect that if the Cowboys had any thoughts on picking up McNabb, they will now put in a claim for Rosenfels instead.  The Texans supposedly have already said they don't want McNabb.  Which probably means McNabb now clears waivers and after that, who knows?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on December 01, 2011, 05:19:05 pm
Who are the Texans going to sign? They can't go into the weekend with one QB...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on December 01, 2011, 05:23:15 pm
Never mind...I see they signed Jake Delhomme today...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 01, 2011, 05:43:54 pm

 One loss by Hanie at Oakland and you are all ready to bail?

 Do you think Hanie is going to win at home against K.C.?

 Whens the last time DAA BEARRSSE had a QB who rushed for 50 yards in a game?
 
 Hanie did against Da Raiduhs.

 Jesus ... you would have cut Payton Manning after his first season ... and Troy Aikman.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AmazinGrace on December 01, 2011, 07:37:27 pm
All I know about McNabb is it sure was nice seeing his mom get pissed off and leave early while the Bears were pounding him earlier this year.  It got pretty old hearing the same stories every time McNabb would come to Chicago and beat the Bears about how his mom cooked dinner for the entire Eagles team.  Screw that.  Nice to see her boy come home and get his ass kicked for once. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 01, 2011, 09:05:59 pm
I would rather roll with Hanie.

Now if McNabb wants to play for the vet minimum and sit on the bench and shut up I would be all for it!   ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 01, 2011, 10:25:14 pm
rumblings on espn the bear might have interest.  lets hope hanie goes gang busters and stays healthy so its a moot point. on another note,watched philly totally implode, have zero sympathy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 02, 2011, 05:32:10 am
If Cowboys are interested in Rosenfels, and the Texans claim is now after ours... we will be seeing McNabb.  Hope not many of you rushed out for those McCown jerseys...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 02, 2011, 07:21:47 am
McNabb was done 2 seasons ago - he should work on his golf game
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on December 02, 2011, 07:49:37 am
I think they are considering McNabb as the #3 to replace McCown.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 08:26:07 am
Exactly. Nobody who knows the situation is expecting McNabb to replace Hanie in the starting lineup.  He would be signed for the same reason we would have signed Orton (or did sign McCown):  a veteran backup in the worst-case scenario of Hanie getting hurt or playing bad beyond belief.

Reportedly Josh McCown has looked godawful in practice this week so don't be surprised at all if the Bears make a play for McNabb... especially if he clears waivers and could be had for a bargain basement price.   By all indications Martz and the Bears are headed for a mutual parting of the ways so I really don't think his preferences on personnel are going to hold much water from this point out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 02, 2011, 10:13:16 am
I believe Martz is a dead man walking. I doubt he has any influence left with Angieblow.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 10:15:08 am
Agreed.  I wouldn't be surprised at all if the boys in Halas Hall are already working on a short list of OC candidates for 2012.  They may even be enlisting Cutler in the discussions (or at least they would if they were smart).  This would be Cutler's 3rd OC in 4 years so the least they could do is at least attempt to find someone that's a good fit with his personality and skill set. So far they've gone 0-for-2 on that count. 

That's assuming they don't just stay in-house and promote Tice, of course.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on December 02, 2011, 10:27:28 am
So someone else got the Ariz. State job that Martz was reportedly interested in.

Is the Chicago media finding out Martz will be gone after this year/ or is this all rumor?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 10:30:11 am
I think they're going primarily off the fact that Martz was offered a contract extension earlier this year and turned it down.

Besides the ASU thing, there was another rumor being floated that Martz might be offered either the OC or HC job with Jacksonville.  I can't see anyone in their right mind offering Martz another NFL HC gig but the Jags have made a lot of questionable decisions the last few years so who knows.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on December 02, 2011, 10:40:05 am
So someone else got the Ariz. State job that Martz was reportedly interested in.

Is the Chicago media finding out Martz will be gone after this year/ or is this all rumor?

Talk here is that Martz could be the new HC in Jacksonville. Apparently the businessman trying to buy the team was a former St. Louis Rams season ticket holder during the Martz years and thinks very highly of him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 10:54:19 am
If Martz thinks the Bears don't have the players to run his offense, wait till he gets a load of that Jaguars roster.  Gabbert is completely incapable of running that scheme, and outside of Maurice Jones-Drew their skill-position talent is terrible. 

The Jags would need a minimum 2 years of aggressive roster re-building to even approach the talent level the Bears are at now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 02, 2011, 11:34:06 am
I'd sign McNabb in a second to backup Hanie..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 11:36:33 am
No reports of any claims yet.

Sage Rosenfels is also out on the market and I wouldn't be surprised if he gets picked up before McNabb.  Donovan's stock has fallen that far.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on December 02, 2011, 11:50:46 am
One guy who I would love to have as an OC, that is IF he's fired after the season's end, is Andy Reid.  I think he can come in and work with Cutler and the offense will be better than the Guru's offense.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 11:51:52 am
Potential good news for the Bears:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/02/kevin-smith-practices-lions-short-two-starters-in-secondary/

So the Lions could be going into New Orleans without Suh and two of their four starting DBs.

If Brees and the Saints are firing on all cylinders, it shouldn't even be close.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 11:53:53 am
Andy Reid...  there's one I hadn't thought of.

He's been a HC for a long time...  not sure he'd be on board with the demotion.  OTOH after all the heat he's taken in Philly this year, maybe a lower profile gig is exactly what he'd be up for.

Personnel wise, other than the QB there wouldn't be a lot of adjustment.  McCoy = Forte, Maclin = Bennett, DeSean Jackson = Johnny Knox, etc.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 02, 2011, 11:58:51 am
Doubt he needs HC money either. It could work.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on December 02, 2011, 12:02:40 pm
If Reid is canned I expect he will quickly be courted by some team as their HC.  He may demand a say-so in the personnel area, also.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 12:14:47 pm
The thing that would make Reid a good fit as the Bears OC is that, like the Bears, the Eagles have gone for quite a few years with no true stud #1 WR and a subpar OL.  In fact I would argue that those positions on the Eagles, currently, are no better than the Bears and may in fact be worse.  Yet Reid for years managed to get decent offensive production even without all the pieces in place.

Give him Cutler, a decent, healthy young OL and a #1 WR and I'm pretty sure we'd all be quite pleased with the results.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 02, 2011, 12:53:08 pm
Plus, it wouldn't hurt to get him and his family out of Philly. Nice upscale burb, media not quite so rabid. Peace and quiet as it were.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 01:06:44 pm
Whoever we get for our next OC, it is absolutely critical that it's someone who's a good fit with Cutler and can build an offense around his abilities and his intelligence.

Cutler is the most physically gifted QB to ever put on a Bears uniform and we have wasted 3 prime years of his career by saddling him with incompetent / inflexible OCs.  IMO, this next OC is the last chance we have to get it right.  If we botch that one, #6 is very likely to walk at the end of his contract and I wouldn't blame him one bit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 02, 2011, 01:09:16 pm
Reid sounds good to me..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 01:13:30 pm
As can be seen by Martz, Tice and Marinelli, there is precedent on the Bears for assimilating former HCs and making it work reasonably well.

If that were to continue to hold true then either Andy Reid or Norv Turner would be within the realm of possibility as our next OC.

I still think the right of first refusal will go to Mike Tice though. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 01:25:17 pm
It sounds like both Rosenfels and McNabb may clear waivers.

That's an interesting set of options for the Bears. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 02, 2011, 01:54:15 pm
I'm sure Sage is good, but for God's sake, at least as a courtesy to the state of Illinois , sign Mcnabb. He grew up rooting for the Bears didn't he? It's like Toronto never making a run at Gretsky, where he was from.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 01:59:34 pm
Except that this isn't about sentiment...  giving a hometown favorite a last chance at redemption before he rides into the sunset.

This is about which QB gives us even a prayer of staying in playoff contention in the event that Hanie goes down or can't get it done for some other reason.  McNabb is 20 lbs overweight, can barely run anymore and is even less effective throwing than he is running.  Think Tim Tebow, except fat and slow. Which may still make him better than Josh McCown but I'm not sure better than Rosenfels.

Personally I would be shocked if the Cowboys don't pick up Rosenfels.  Unless they're waiting for him to clear waivers and will go after him then.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 02:17:53 pm
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/02/bears-give-earl-bennett-four-year-18-million-extension/

$9 mil guaranteed and worth every penny. This offense took a big step backwards while he was out earlier this season.

There are teams in the league that would have bid his price far higher in FA so I'm glad we got this done now.  $4.5 mil a year for a reliable, possession-plus WR is fair money and should still leave plenty under the cap to get the true #1 we need for Cutler and our next OC.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 02, 2011, 02:22:22 pm
Now lets see Hanie target him as much at Cutler did.  How many balls went his way last Sunday? 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on December 02, 2011, 02:26:09 pm
I wonder what that will do for Forte's attitude.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 02:29:33 pm
Here's the deal...  I want Forte to get paid as much as anyone else. 

And he will...  but unfortunately (for him) it will be via the franchise tag.  The boys in Halas Hall have very obviously decided that's the way it's gonna go down and then at some point next season they will come back to the table with a longer-term offer.  We can only hope that by that point they haven't so alienated Forte that he tells them to stick their long-term offer no matter how sweet it may be...  which is an entirely likely scenario.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 02:34:01 pm
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/02/bears-not-expected-to-claim-mcnabb/

Still leaves the option of Rosenfels.  Who is nothing special but I find it very hard to believe he couldn't bring us more than we've got with McCown, aka Todd Collins 2.0. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 03:24:26 pm
Scratch the previous post.

Vikings claimed Rosenfels.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 02, 2011, 03:25:21 pm
And Suh has a 2 game suspension.  I think he got off kind of easy there.  Haynseworth got 5 games. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 02, 2011, 03:29:34 pm
A big NO TANX to McNabb!! That guy as Yapp said is slow, fat, aging and showing it big time! Saw a couple Vikes games and he has seriously lost a step. It's retirement time for him. He was constantly missing throws, throwing them short and skipping them to the recievers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 03:39:58 pm
If McCown has to play our season is over. But the same could be said of McNabb, in all likelihood, and there has been no indication that the folks at Halas Hall want to make yet another roster move at the #2/3 QB position on the very slim chance it might work out.

The reason Donovan asked for his release from the Vikings is cause they had just demoted him to the #3 QB. When you're behind Joe Webb on the depth chart of a 2-9 team, it's winter in Minnesota and you've got plenty of cash in the bank, there's not a lot of reason to stick around.  That being said, I suspect McNabb is at least a bit surprised that not even the Bears put in a claim.

Let's all be praying Hanie gets in the groove this Sunday and stays healthy for the duration.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 02, 2011, 04:15:20 pm
I wonder if McNabb signs a one-day contract with the Eagles and retires?

Of course the way things have gone in Philly this year they'd probably eff that up too.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 02, 2011, 06:01:25 pm
Hanie has more potential than Donovan - Let the kid take his lumps
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on December 02, 2011, 06:59:47 pm
McNabb is better than what we have currently at backup for Hanie.  Bears making a big mistake not getting him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 02, 2011, 10:24:08 pm

Just because no team put a claim on McNabb doesn't mean he won't sign somewhere.  They just don't have to assume the remainder of his Viking salary and can negotiate a new deal.

His numbers weren't that bad for 2011.  60% completeion...4 TDs..2 picks...83 rating.

Not asking if he's a better option than Hanie...but is he better option than McCown.

Worth bringing in for a tryout...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 02, 2011, 10:26:43 pm
 Who's Enderle ? Oh, that QB we drafted in the fifth round.

 Who knows more about the Martz system then McCown & McNabb combined.

 Lets see ... the name of the HC who started a rookie QB named Orton was ...

 Lovie Smith ??

 If Hanie (god forbid) should somhow get dinged ... then Enderle,

 welcome to the big leagues !

 You will follow in the footsteps of a fellow rookie QB who left DAA BEARRSSE with a ...

 Winning Record !  :D

 Enderle, has shall we say ... a unique fullback build ... 6' 1" 241 lbs. Tim Tebow anyone ?

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 02, 2011, 10:44:35 pm
I agree Enderle should know more, but he is stiff as a board, very imobile.  He may not make the roster next year if Martz gets launched.  Just saying.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 02, 2011, 11:10:42 pm
I agree Enderle should know more, but he is stiff as a board, very imobile.  He may not make the roster next year if Martz gets launched.  Just saying.

 I havent seen him play a down yet ... and hopefully ... I never will.

 Carry the clipboard for Hanie & Cutler ... mmmmmmmmmm !  ;D

 BUT ... he is there and to ignore him if he gets pushed into the game ... I just hope he does well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 03, 2011, 06:45:33 am
Yaps - I don't doubt that McCown is gawdawful as you put it, and any chance of him seeing the field and the Bears winning in the playoffs are mutually exclusive.  BUT, where did you hear/read how he is doing in practice?  Do you make some of this stuff up, or do you have a connection somewhere?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 03, 2011, 06:56:01 am
We will not sign Reid.  Even if he is available and openly campaigning for the job and washing Angelo's truck.  Here's why.  Lovie.  Lovie will not put a threat to his job, on the sidelines with him.  See Singletary, Rivera, etc for reference.  I guess I don't blame him, but that is how he operates.  How many times as he seen his team swoon, the media and fans start circling him like vultures, and then he pulls the season out of the tank. 

I have gone from a lukewarm Lovie guy, to someone that is pretty strong in his corner.  He is maddening, stubborn, horrible on sideline challenges and a terrible clock manager.  He's also a winner.  He just wins, more games than not.  His players will die for him, lay it on the line for him.  He holds them accountable.  You're not performing, you sit, next up.

But he won't allow a perceived threat on the sideline, so it is really not worth fantasizing over.  I do like the idea of Tice.  Offensive line coach, was pursued to be the Titan's OC.  He will bring a toughness to the offense, and I don't think he would pull a WTF play out of the playbook every few weeks.  He knows the personnel, and it would be easier to find an offensive line coach that follows his blueprint for the offensive line.  Keep the blocking scheme, find a coach that stresses the details like he does, and run his offense. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 03, 2011, 11:20:25 am
I don't see Lovie as an elite coach, but if you look around the league, he's probably as good as any one else right now. Jim Harbaugh is still new, but I would have to say he is the front runner for coach of the year.

If it was up to me, McNabb would be signed first chance we got. Not to take Hanie's place, but to take McCown's place. Our primary goal right now is to make the playoffs, see what happens after that..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 03, 2011, 02:45:51 pm
It's hard to 'dislike' a coach like Lovie when he keeps getting your team into the playoffs. This year we're pretty close and we would be in easily had Cutler not gone down. You look at some of the other teams out there underperforming, like Eagles and Cowboys, Chargers and it's hard to say our coach sucks or doesn't fit or whatever. He gets the team to the playoffs and even beyond.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 03, 2011, 03:09:34 pm
I am fine with Lovie sticking around.  Odds are when he is let go the next coach will be worse.  He is easily one of the top 15 if not top 10 HC in the league right now.

He also helps bring in free agents due to him being liked by the players.  He is tough but fair which is what you look for in a HC.  We as Bears fans can and have done much worse.

That said I want a Super Bowl win damn it!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 03, 2011, 09:15:45 pm

but...but...but...Lovie doesn't show emotion on the sidelines...we need someone with more emotion like that guy from Detroit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 04, 2011, 01:08:19 am
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-1204-haugh-bears-chicago--20111204,0,6102651.column

A good article on Cutlers surgery.  Apparently he went to a different doctor then the Bears wanted him to.  I don't blame him after seeing the Bears track record with season and career ending injuries.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 04, 2011, 06:03:22 am
When Cutler comes out and starts spinning the ball in the playoffs, all will be forgotten.  Screw the "people around Halas Hall" who didn't like that he went to another surgeon.  It's his career and livelihood on the line, let him make his own choice.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 04, 2011, 07:57:51 am
"Spinning" is right...man,he throws a tight spiral! I mean it's like a friggin dart! If you've ever tried to throw a football with a perfect spiral on it, it ain't easy. He does it time and again...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 04, 2011, 10:27:10 am
Best move Cutler has made all season, avoiding the Bears medical staff.  ;)  Now I just hope Kristen doesnt set back his recovery. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 04, 2011, 11:46:39 am
Do you make some of this stuff up, or do you have a connection somewhere?

The info about how bad McCown looked in practice came from either a Tribune article or a blog.  Something to the effect of, from the way he threw it's easy to see why McCown was teaching high school biology two weeks ago.

I don't have a connection, nor do I make stuff up.  I pass on what I've seen reported but it's up to y'all to decide if the sources are legit or not.   ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 04, 2011, 11:51:33 am
Cutler was absolutely right to go out of house for his surgery.

Colombo, Tommie Harris, Mike Brown...  etc.  The Bears track record of managing potentially career altering injuries to key players is not good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 05, 2011, 01:36:56 pm
Theoretical question...

IF Hanie doesn't pull his head out...  and IF we go 0-for the rest of the season (that would be 7-9)... missing the playoffs...  and IF while all this is happening Lovie and Angelo don't do anything to upgrade the QB position even when Donavan McNabb is sitting by his phone...  In essence, saying, "we're not sure this will help the situation so we're not even going to try."  That sure feels to me like negligence. Which in most organizations would be considered grounds for termination.

OTOH, as I said yesterday...  7-9 with a better draft pick and easier schedule may be the only way to turn this season into something positive long-term.  9-7, just missing the playoffs and drafting in the low 20s doesn't really help anyone.  So maybe standing pat is the way to go although it is almost certainly gonna be painful to watch the next few weeks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 05, 2011, 05:24:46 pm

A better draft spot buys you what?  Remember who runs the draft.

As for the easier schedule, the only time to determine if you had an easy schedule is after you played it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 06, 2011, 11:58:23 am
Assuming Martz walks at the end of this season...  I will be very interested to hear what some of his current players on the Bears have to say about him.  Cutler has already taken some swipes at him and he certainly isn't alone. I sense real frustration with Martz by some of the offensive players on this team (and defensive players as well), and it could be pretty entertaining at the point where they can speak their minds without risk of reprisal.

Any of you who said at the outset that Mike Martz was a bad fit for this team... step forward and accept your props.   

Meanwhile, Lovie is in full spin mode:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/lovie-smith-reports-of-mike-martzs-departure-are-made-up/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 06, 2011, 04:45:52 pm
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/jeff-garcia-claims-kellen-clemens-job/

Amazing to see the difference between a well run franchise and the Bears when both are faced with the loss of their franchise QB. 

The Texans continue to pro-actively manage their QB situation to try and improve it, while the Bears in contrast continue to do nothing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 06, 2011, 05:08:35 pm
Oops...  Carimi's former OL-mate busted for PEDs:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/seahawks-john-moffitt-suspended-for-performance-enhancing-drugs/

I hope Carimi's keeping his nose clean while he rehabs...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 07, 2011, 08:22:09 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/forte-says-hell-play-when-hes-100-percent/

I'm gettting a bad feeling it's gonna go down something like this:

Forte will sit out the rest of the year, Angelo will say he's milking it, an already tense situation between the parties will deterioriate and not only will Forte not get offered an extension, we won't franchise him either. At which point the Packers or Lions will scoop him up as a free agent for huge money. 

Then to replace Forte, Angelo will spend our 1st round draft pick on a RB, who will be a bust.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 07, 2011, 08:43:21 am
I still think he should have accepted the offer they put in front of him - or his agent
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 07, 2011, 09:12:33 am
Forte will be franchised.  He should of taken the contract he was offered.

It was a stupid move on his part.  I don't feel sorry for him.  He will make a **** load of money next year and still possibly get a huge contract.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 07, 2011, 09:16:40 am
That all being said, it is absolutely appropriate for Forte not to play again this year.  Without Cutler we're not making the playoffs so what's the point?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 07, 2011, 09:21:31 am
I would sit my 4 weeks (all the regular season) and come back if the Bears make the playoffs which likely doesnt happen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 07, 2011, 10:04:35 am
The Bears really need to handle Forte right from here on out.  The perception is already that Angelo & Co. have jerked him around on his contract for way too long and now if they lean on him to come back before his ready, and/or try to lowball him with a "damaged goods" extension...  well that just won't look good at all.

Matt Forte is one of the most respected players in the league, not only by his teammates but by competitors and the average NFL fan-in-the-street.  I don't know how many times I've read or heard comments like, "I'm not even a Bears fan, but I like Forte."  If the Bears botch things with him we might as well forget about landing Vincent Jackson or any other quality FAs cause they're gonna just tell the boys in Halas Hall to go sh*t in their hat. Players talk with each other about these things.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 07, 2011, 10:30:43 am
When he is healthy he should play period.  If he doesn't he is quitting on the team and he can go elsewhere I don't care what the record is. 

As long as the knee is not healthy he should sit.  No reason to risk his career and if he is not close to 100% he would not be helping the team anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on December 07, 2011, 10:35:45 am
Bears offered Forte $15 million guaranteed, more than the recent contracts of Frank Gore and Ahmad Bradshaw.  he turned it down.

It's not like the team low balled him or didn't try to sign him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 07, 2011, 10:54:17 am
There's an article in the Tribune today that says Forte took some sort of injection that's supposed to speed the healing.

So it sounds like he's holding up his end of the deal.  Not that I would expect anything different from him.

I think what would bring the best resolution for both parties would be for Angelo & Co. to incrementally improve the offer from the one they brought to the table earlier this year.  Add $3-4 million to the total and increase the guarantee by $2 mil.  Which would put to rest any charges of post-injury "lowballing" and also show appreciation for the outstanding season Forte delivered up till now.  And then Forte should take that offer without hesitation.  That's what I would really like to see happen and seriously, it's not like either party would lose face in that scenario.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 07, 2011, 11:03:39 am
When he is healthy he should play period.

I have a slightly different take.  I think he should play only when he is fully healed BUT ONLY if the Bears are still in playoff contention.

And by fully healed I mean 100%...   not 90 or even 95%.

Say he is declared 100% for the Packers game...  but in the meantime we have lost to Denver and the Seahawks, eliminating us from the playoffs. Is there any point whatsoever in putting two games of wear and tear on his body that mean nothing in the big picture?  And especially considering those will both be physically grueling games (Packers at Lambeau and Vikings on the carpet in Minny). To me that would simply be foolish. 

I want to see Forte back in action as much as anyone...  but don't rush him back before he's ready, and don't play him if the games don't mean anything by then.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 07, 2011, 11:07:18 am
Keep upping the offer until He and his greedy agent are satisfied?

That's not a good way to do business...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 07, 2011, 11:19:23 am
The Bears made forte a decent offer, they can't bow to every player and their agent. He's having his best year that I can remember. Contact year, coincidence? I'd say not..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 07, 2011, 11:57:38 am
Keep upping the offer until He and his greedy agent are satisfied?

That's not a good way to do business...


Losing a guy who accounts for nearly 40% of your total offense is also not a good way to do business.

What really sucks for Forte is that Chris Johnson got paid a bajillion dollars this past offseason, then came out and for most of this year has done absolutely nothing.

CJ's contract was excessive even in light of his past production, and then for him to come out and be a stiff this year...  it's going to make it virtually impossible for any other RB to get anywhere close to that kind of coin for a long time.

Not to mention that with the NFL rule changes, situational substitution etc., the "franchise RB" as many of us understood growing up, is pretty much going away.  I have heard multiple people say recently that there is really no reason for a team to spend a 1st round draft pick on a RB anymore.  As the perceived value of the RB position goes down, the guys who play that position are gonna find they have less and less leverage in financial dealings.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 07, 2011, 11:58:48 am
I think I read somewhere that he has 997 yards so far this year.  It would be nice for him to come back and get 4 yards, and then sit down.  Although 1000 yards isnt quite what it used to be. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 07, 2011, 11:59:38 am
997 rushing (4.9 avg).  And 490 receiving.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 07, 2011, 12:05:25 pm
QB is where it's at, not the RB. I like Forte, but I'd be seriously pissed if it was Cutler that they weren't dealing with. Also, give me better receivers and watch Forte's numbers (receiving) go down. I'm big on being able to pound the ball, and that starts up front..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 07, 2011, 01:11:24 pm
I want to see Forte back in action as much as anyone...  but don't rush him back before he's ready, and don't play him if the games don't mean anything by then.

Thats my feelings. Why try to come back if the games are meaningless. Contract issues or no contract issues. Just make sure you are 100% And no I wouldnt feel bad if a normal injury time is 4-8 weeks and Forte stayed out the rest of the season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 07, 2011, 01:28:07 pm

I'm hoping he's back for the Seattle game...but if Hanie can show more consistentcy we won't need him against the Seahawks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 07, 2011, 03:10:47 pm
 Hey Martz, EXPLAIN THIS :

 Hanie at Oakland :

 249 yds. 2 TD's 3 INT's 3 sacks
 
 Hanie at home :

 133 yds. 0 TD's 3 Int's 7 sacks
 
 So you just HAD to pull the 7 step drop out of the playbook that had gotten Cutler killed.

 You just couldnt lay off that with a new cherry could you?

 BTW ... BEARS DEFENSE ... you thought this game was a GIMME when it was a TRAP game.

 Stelz had 8 tackles, Peanut had 7 .................................... Urlacher had 2.

 The whole DL had 16. One more then 2 guys in the secondary.

 BEARS DL and LB corp took the day off because they KNEW they were going to win.

 Think again motherfuuuckers when you dont show up to play.  >:(
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 07, 2011, 03:19:31 pm
Jackie, I am not giving the D a pass, but they did only give up 10 pts.  Under "normal" circumstances that would mean a win.  Just saying.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 07, 2011, 03:32:51 pm
I thought the defense played about as well as they could given the ridiculous amount of time our non-offense put them on the field.

There was a stretch in the first half there where the DL and especially Peppers was just blowing up everything in sight.

2nd half the D definitely tailed off but again, look at the reps they were logging.  And they still managed to hold the Chiefs to only 3 points the entire 2nd half.

My biggest beef with the D is that they biffed two or three opportunities to collect turnovers that could have turned the game. Peanut dropped an INT and there was a fumble by Bowe that he recovered even though two Bears defenders were right there. In that respect we were really missing Major Wright and D.J. Moore, who are the two best ballhawks we have.

But truthfully, if you need 3 turnovers from your D to beat a 4-7 team in your own house...  your D is not the problem.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 07, 2011, 03:55:07 pm
Excerpt from Tribune article today about Cutler's status:

Cutler, who suffered the broken thumb Nov. 20 against the San Diego Chargers, confirmed that he had a sterilized football placed in his right hand during the procedure with Dr. Randy Viola in Vail, Colo., to ensure that he would be able to maintain a proper grip.

"My biggest concern with it was -- because we were going to pin it and we were going to screw it -- and my concern and Dr. Viola's concern was that even if I got some stiffness I'd still be able to grip the ball normally," Cutler said. "So during the surgery he brought in a sterilized football and put my hand on it after he screwed everything in and made sure my grip was where I liked it, and I would have some freedom and flexibility. He's on top of his game. I didn't go out there for nothing."


Boldface added for emphasis and this is EXACTLY why Cutler made the right call going out-of-house for treatment.  I doubt if those quacks on the Bears staff would have even thought to do this.  What he's saying without saying, is that he wasn't willing to entrust his livelihood to the Bears' medical staff and based on past history I wouldn't have either. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 07, 2011, 05:03:02 pm
Now he needs to go sit in one of those oxygen therapy tank deals that supposedly helps heal much faster.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on December 07, 2011, 05:05:35 pm
I see that Major Suckage has moved to Chicago.

Nice
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 08, 2011, 05:01:55 am
Deerskin...

(http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w37/Grizzlybear34/Otto.jpg)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 08, 2011, 08:07:41 am
Why did you force me to see that this time of the morning?  God...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BillSharp on December 08, 2011, 08:10:18 am
funny, he doesn't look like he has had any major head injuries.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on December 08, 2011, 08:42:38 am
Actually my take on Cutler going outside to get operated on is a little different. I think it shows a kind of dark side to Bears management and not a keen sense of long-term thought by Cutler.

Don't get me wrong, I love the guy- he is putting his team before his own well-being by even trying to come back as early as possible. He's the best QB I've seen in a Bears Uni in my lifetime (Jimmy Mac was above average- but couldn't stay healthy and had that monster D on his side).

Standing back from the situation and trying to look objectively at it (problematic at best :D), it may not be the wisest decision long-term (financially) and is fraught with risks. But he is a gambler. If that helocopter TD he had in his 1st year here did not endear Cutler to some fans, this act should.

I think the team staff has to play it conservative- they have plan to expect lawsuits and litigation. Now that Jay has gone outside, if something goes wrong, they can always blame Jay for going "outside" their care in court, and I would bet the liability would be lessened if he chose to sue if he comes back and is (god forbid) hurt worse.

Dark side of business, but Cutler is taking the gamble- here's hoping it pays off for all involved.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 08, 2011, 08:47:19 am
Cutler's a smart dude, regardless of what some people want to think.

You don't get into Vanderbilt being an idiot... even if you can spin the football.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 08, 2011, 08:58:44 am
Has anyone else noticed that the offensive players we've brought in here who played for Martz on other teams have pretty much been dreadful?

Orlando Pace, Manumaleauna, Roy Williams, McCown...   

The best case scenario of course is for Martz to leave after this year along with his former players that are currently littering our roster...  but even if he should stay on (God forbid), we need to quit giving bad players a spot on this team just cause they know Martz and his system.  Eff the system, can the guy play?  That should be the only criteria.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on December 08, 2011, 10:19:09 am
A real good OC would match the players he has to the system. But Martz is stubborn (and arrogant). His way is the only way. Reminds me of an article published back in the 70's someone posted of the reason the Bears went without a QB for so long in the late 60s-70s- the system was more important than the QB. Old is new again.... again :D

I'll see if I can find it...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 08, 2011, 10:26:10 am
In the Tribune today Pompeii said that Norv Turner and Mike Martz basically run the same offense and I was like, whaat?

If that's the case then maybe Norv isn't the guy for us but I really don't think their systems are similar at all.  Yeah they both like to pass a lot but Norv uses the TE and the FB a lot more than Martz ever does.  Also you look at the Chargers WRs the last few years and they're all big (6'2 or taller, Vincent Jackson is 6'5)...  nothing at all like our cast of smurfs or the 5'10 to 6' guys that Martz rolled with in St. Louis.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 08, 2011, 07:40:34 pm

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Zi0xiIiUBw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Zi0xiIiUBw)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 08, 2011, 07:48:17 pm
Norv and Martz both run variations of the Air Coryell system.  However Norv's sure looks a lot like a WC offense to me.  While Martz is probably closer to the original Coryell system. 

Plus I know he allows audibles while Martz does not.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on December 08, 2011, 08:49:38 pm
Why did you force me to see that this time of the morning?  God...

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL FOR DAYS!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 09, 2011, 08:45:22 am
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-1209-brite-bears-chicago--20111209,0,382634.story

Article on how Matt Forte is using Tommie Harris' hyperbaric chamber to try and speed his recovery.

Gotta prop Forte on being aggressive with his recovery but I hope he had that chamber exorcised or cleansed or something before his uses it. It didn't really help Tommie at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on December 09, 2011, 09:34:00 am
Cutty come back ! LOL !   ;D

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 11, 2011, 01:20:34 pm
Hub and Hamp were talking about a report by Jason La Canfora about the possibility of Angelo retiring at the end of the season depending on how the Bears finish the season.  As for me it cant come soon enough.

Also heard Mike Francessa talking to Phill Simms today. Simms finally sees that the offense is flawed without Cuttler and he now sees the OLine problems and the receiving corp being below average and Cutler being what makes the Bears offense go
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 11, 2011, 07:10:32 pm
Cutty come back is about right....0 for without him....season's gone....SUCKS....had top wildcard seed all but wrapped up,until hell let loose and now we're cooked....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 11, 2011, 08:17:11 pm
No Cutty, don't come back.

Season's over, there's no point now after we sh-it the bed in front of your ex-team.

Take all the time you need to get healthy, and we'll see you in the OTAs next spring.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 11, 2011, 10:02:36 pm
Seasons over. Get your rest Cutty
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 12, 2011, 08:01:57 am
Yup...  heal the thumb, bang Kristin silly the next few months and come back in April ready to ball...  with a new OC (please) and a real WR (please please).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 12, 2011, 09:19:49 am
So much work to do this offseason:

- New coaching (OC at minimum as I know Lovie is staying regardless).

- #1 WR - Duh.  RoyBoy is brutal.

- Substantially better starting players at both OG positions and probably OT as well - pass protection up the middle has been non-existent the last few games, and Webb and Louis are taking turns sucking on the outside.

- A 3rd DE that can produce and stay healthy - time's about up on Wootton and as Peppers gets older this will only increase in importance

- Another big CB that can help Peanut out when we go to man coverage - I was hoping Bowman would be this guy but it's not looking that way

- Much better 2nd-team players at the QB, RB, WR and OL positions - Hanie couldn't make a UFL roster. Barber does some good things but may have punched his ticket out of town these last two games. We have no depth to speak of at WR, much less starters outside of Bennett. Lack of OL depth is self-explanatory and has been on display the last three seasons.

If we do all that, we might...  MIGHT...  be able to stay far enough ahead of the Lions to grab a wildcard spot next year.  If not, then we're looking at no playoffs and a solid 3rd place finish in the division.  Cause the Lions aren't going away.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 12, 2011, 09:23:49 am
I would say an OT is a must.  You figure Carimi when he gets back will either play RT or LT.  Wouldnt mind seeing what he can do at LT if we can find a huge mauler to play RT.  Lance Louise looked a little gun shy yesterday. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on December 12, 2011, 09:36:46 am
If the prevent last night was Marinelli's call, then his stupid old azz can go as well...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 12, 2011, 09:47:29 am
I think what's happened with Lance Louis is that there are now enough games of him on tape at RT that opposing DL coaches are figuring out how to beat him.

The other thing is that he's 6'3 playing a position where normal height is 3 to 5 inches taller. That's a lot of wingspan to give up.  I love the guy's tenacity and fire but I think he's hit the point where his physical limitations (as an OT) are catching up to him and he may struggle right through the end of the season.

Which doesn't mean he sucks per se and we have to get rid of him...  it means we need to get a real RT in place for 2012 (whether that be a healthy Carimi or someone else) so he can move back inside.

Where I think we need to go with the OL for 2012 is something like this:

LT - Someone better than Webb (Carimi or otherwise)
LG - Someone better than Williams... a rookie, FA or possibly Louis
C - Spencer
RG - Louis, or rookie or FA
RT - Carimi (or rookie / FA if Carimi goes to the left side)

As for the others:

- Chris Williams is not starting material but should be kept as our top sub as he can play OG or OT 
- Garza is fading fast here in the late season and he may be a guy we keep as a backup C/G but his days as a starter appear to be over once this season ends
- Edwin Williams hasn't shown me much and I certainly think for the 7th or 8th O-Lineman we can do better; maybe he goes away and Levi Horn inherits this spot on the roster 
- Omiyale, obviously, is a cut
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 12, 2011, 10:00:29 am
All of the above being said...  realistically I expect our 2012 front 5 to line up like this:

LT Webb
LG Williams
C Spencer
RG Louis
RT Carimi

With Garza as the #6, Levi Horn as the 7 and maybe a token draft pick (3rd round or below) as the 8th.

Tice is not going to want to rebuild the OL yet again, he values continuity, and even if he wanted to upgrade 2 or 3 postions Angelo is very unlikely to bring in the new OL talent to do that...  so while my previous post outlines the scenario that would be best for this team, what's above is what I see actually happening.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 12, 2011, 10:59:01 am
The liklihood we see Angieblow spend another #1 on another OT is like hoping for 100 dollar bills to begin falling out of trees

However, that jason La Canfora report of Angelo retiring cant be discounted with the bad personnel we have put on the field since the Forte and Cutler injuries. It definitely shows the ineptitude of our GM. Just pray that Ruskell doesnt inherit the job, because I dont see any improvement in the team under his tutelidge, just more of the incompetence of Angelo
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 12, 2011, 11:00:05 am
I predict that the Hope & Change platform will be in full effect for the Bears brass in 2012.

They will HOPE Cutler and Forte stay healthy next season and they will CHANGE very little of anything.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 12, 2011, 11:02:44 am
The liklihood we see Angieblow spend another #1 on another OT is like hoping for 100 dollar bills to begin falling out of trees

Actually this year I would rather see our #1 used on a big WR that can make plays in the clutch and that opposing DCs actually have to plan around.  Watching balls clang off RoyBoy and Knox's mitts has become more than I can take.  This draft is full of big (6'3 225 or bigger) WRs with a good size/speed package, and if we finish 7-9 (very possible) we should be able to land one of the better ones.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 12, 2011, 11:14:03 am

First of all, Garza was just awarded a new contract.  So you figure he's liked and the favorite at center.  I think Chris Williams has to be the favorite to return to LG.  Lance Louis goes back to RG.  Carimi and Webb are your tackles.  Spencer provides depth at the interior spots.   Use our high 3rd rounder to draft another lineman to take Omiyale's roster spot. 

We've got other needs for our top 2 picks.

The line was playing well when Cutler was at QB.  Nothing wrong with their run blocking yesterday.   Recently Louis has been exposed but a good number of recent sacks can be put on Hanie.  He just does not react well to the rush like Cutler did.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 12, 2011, 11:17:37 am
Personally I'd rather the Bears go after a proven WR such as Vincent Jackson than try to get any talent out of the draft. The current talent evaluators have failed to accomplish a thing
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 12, 2011, 11:27:21 am

I'd prefer Jackson over a rookie WR too, but do you think the Chargers just let Jackson walk?  There's always the franchise tag if they can't work out a deal.

Regardless, our WR talent has to be among the worst in the league.  Cutler was making them look mediocre.  We need an upgrade either via draft or free agency...or BOTH.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 12, 2011, 11:44:31 am
Garza did pretty well at C the first half of the season but it seems like he's been getting blown up more lately. 

Dallas and I have divergent views on this but I believe that Spencer will be our starting C in 2012. Spencer is easily the more physically capable of the two, but he has essentially been playing with one arm (a big liability if you're a C), and more importantly, Garza has the benefit of an extra year in the offense.  So Garza inherited the C position this year because of the line call responsibilties, and Spencer has played RG (not his natural position) because of the need to move Louis outside.

Given the offseason to get healthy and become familiar with the line calls, I believe Spencer will win the starting C job hands down next year in camp PROVIDED he is given a fair shot to compete for it.  In which case Garza would battle Lance Louis to get his old RG spot back, or he would move to the bench as a valuable backup who is capable of subbing at either G or C.

It seems safe to assume that with everything else in place -- i.e., a healthy Cutler and Forte, a true #1 WR and a legitimate OC -- then a starting front 5 of Webb, Williams, Garza/Spencer, Louis and Carimi can probably get the job done.  They won't be an elite unit, but they'll be acceptable. It's if and when all those other pieces aren't in place that I wonder whether those 5 are good enough...  and that's where I think a 2nd round OL pick next April would be well worth the investment as a hedge if nothing else. 

I also put the odds of Carimi and/or Chris Williams ever lasting a complete season as slim to none, so there's that to consider as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 12, 2011, 01:09:02 pm
Garza or Spencer at C - I don't care.  I just know that the Bears have always said that Garza grades out well.

If a top notch LT drops into our laps in round 1 I would not be opposed to drafting him.  I like J'Marcus Webb but you could see what an elite LT is capable of in Ryan Clady yesterday.  He really did a fine job on Peppers even if he held him half a dozen times.  But they rarely call that anymore unless its just an absolute blatant take down.

Speaking of which.  Late in the game, the Bears had the Broncos deep near their goal line.  Teblow goes back to pass and Toeaina rushed hard and overpowers the guard.  The guard is falling backward and pulls Toeaina down with him - essentially a tackle.  No call.   Teblow rolls left and completes a pass to get the Broncos rolling.

Again, there is so much holding in the NFL - they could call it on every play.  You see it every week.  Defenders locked into position unable to even move sideways - just frozen in place.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 12, 2011, 01:17:03 pm
Yup.  In fact I remember seeing on one of the replays, Peppers had two guys on him and BOTH of them had grips on him that would have been called holding back in the day.   When you're not only being double-teamed, but double HELD...  well...  what can you do?

I remember being so pi**ed that we let Tebow get out of the end zone and complete that big pass.  But I hadn't seen the takedown on Toeaina.  If that had been flagged in the end zone, that's a safety and we get 2 points, the ball and almost certainly close-out the game in regulation.

No disrespect to Tebow (or even more so the Bronco's D)...  but the Broncs got the benefit of a LOT of home cookin yesterday.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 12, 2011, 01:20:37 pm

Idonijie did hit Tebow low and deserved the flag but Briggs hit Tebow in his chest with a forearm and Tebow takes a fall and gets the call.  I didn't see any helmet/helmet contact.

Total BS.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: otto105 on December 12, 2011, 01:58:25 pm
Forte is going to walk...the bears draft a RB first round.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 12, 2011, 02:07:46 pm
Forte is going to walk...the bears draft a RB first round.

Not that the Bears would never create a hole just to fill it...  in fact there is a pretty strong history of that in this organization...  but I really don't see either of those things happening. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 12, 2011, 03:37:00 pm
C'mon guys. "Were going with what we've got". OK?  No need to change anything.  Until the revenue stream is affected.  Then, oddly enough, all hell breaks loose. I'm sure Virginia still has the headhunter on speed dial of her rotary phone.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on December 12, 2011, 06:36:52 pm
I never dreamed that Carimi would miss this many games.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 13, 2011, 06:25:14 am

 The history of this OL speaks for itself.

 2 first round draft picks out to lunch.

 Will Carimi & C. Williams be starting ?

 Keith Van Horne these fuuuckers are not ... and it shows.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 13, 2011, 08:11:13 am
I never dreamed that Carimi would miss this many games.

He's a Jerry Angelo 1st round draft pick.  Those guys always take at least a couple of years before they're doing much of anything for the Bears...  sometimes longer...  sometimes never.

But, Carimi's not the only O-Lineman drafted high last year whose season has ended early.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 13, 2011, 08:37:45 am
So I'm looking at the playoff scenarios and it looks like the only way we get in over the Lions is if we win 2 of our last 3 games and the Lions lose out.

#1, two of the Lions' last 3 games are against the Raiders and the Chargers...  I can't see any way they don't win at least one of those games and they'll probably win them both.  #2, we would have to beat the Seahawks and the Vikings (a loss to the Pack is a given), and I'm calling our game against the Seahawks as a loss for the Bears since the Bears are really no better than the Rams at this point. 

And that's not even counting all the other things that would have to happen to the Falcons, Giants and/or Cowboys in the interim. 

So yeah, our season is pretty much over.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 13, 2011, 10:19:20 am
Agree - Bears have no reason to be anywjere but home on the couch for the playoffs - this just wasn't their year
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 13, 2011, 10:33:22 am
Losing to a decent Raiders team with Caleb Hanie starting his first game ever...  that one I can swallow.

But these last two losses have been simply inexcusable.  With the blame starting at Ted Phillips and going right on down.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 13, 2011, 11:03:09 am
I agree.  The Chiefs and Bronco losses are almost to much to bear for me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 13, 2011, 11:38:15 am
There are times when I really,really wish I could get close to a member of upper Bear management (it really doesn't matter which one) stick my fingers down my throat and vomit all over their front.  Then I realize the message would probably not be understood. (sigh).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 13, 2011, 03:40:12 pm
Thing is, with the right couple moves by someone who knows what the heck they're doing, we could match up with anybody. Body or two on the Oline, a good wideout, a real backup QB...even just those moves would have made a world of difference right about now.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 13, 2011, 03:58:29 pm
Assuming Cutler, Forte, Williams and Carimi all come back 100% I think we have almost all the pieces a competent OC (read: not Mike Martz) would need to assemble a fairly potent offense. 

What's lacking first and foremost, is a stud #1 WR.  This needs to be, with no dispute, the #1 priority as far as a player acquisition this offseason. Our entire offense is being handcuffed by the lack of a WR that can draw double teams and break games open with impact plays. 

It would also be nice to have 1 better body to plug in somewhere on the OL, and possibly a seam-busting TE (although we may have that guy in the rookie that's now on IR).

And yeah, a quality backup QB.  That's huge as we have all seen by now.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 14, 2011, 12:48:01 am
 Sombody has to pay for Denver ...

 and if DAA BEARRSSE have their shiiit wired ...

 it sure in the hell is going to be Seattle and Tarvaris Jackson.

 I actually feel sorry for Jackson.  :(
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 14, 2011, 11:09:04 am
Give me a top flight left tackle, a number 1 receiver and a legit NFL QB for backup. The O would be fine. The D? Another story, they worry me. Reality will soon set in, the core of our D will soon be over the hill..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 14, 2011, 11:35:06 am
I really hope Peppers doesn't go down before the end of this season.

Because our D without Peppers would be just as bad as our O without Cutler and that would give AngiRuskell all the ammo they need to reach for a 2nd or 3rd round DE with our 1st round pick.  That Coples guy is a stud but nobody after him is that special and I'd rather wait till the 2nd round and take my chances on the best DE that remains rather than taking a guy a round too early just cause Lovie and Marinelli were in a panic. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 14, 2011, 04:30:48 pm
JJ, got that 30-30 ready for the draft? The SECOND Angielow opens his friggin mouth to pick another LB or safety in the first pick, nail his butt! Got it? K......
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 14, 2011, 05:04:10 pm
JJ, got that 30-30 ready for the draft? The SECOND Angielow opens his friggin mouth to pick another LB or safety in the first pick, nail his butt!

Well since you mentioned it...

I've seen one mock draft that has us taking an OLB from North Carolina with our 1st round pick (Brown)...  and another that has us taking a SS from Bama (Barron).  An undersized DE from South Carolina (Melvin Ingram) has also been mentioned.

Just sayin.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 14, 2011, 10:23:30 pm
Give me a top flight left tackle, a number 1 receiver and a legit NFL QB for backup. The O would be fine. The D? Another story, they worry me. Reality will soon set in, the core of our D will soon be over the hill..

 It seems so incredibley obvious that it will be ignored at Halas Hall.

JJ, got that 30-30 ready for the draft? The SECOND Angielow opens his friggin mouth to pick another LB or safety in the first pick, nail his butt! Got it? K......

Why waste good ammo?

 1. WR or LT

 2. LT or WR

 3. From there on out, whatever.

 Sign a Legit backup QB.

 So far we've drafted 2 LT's recently ... neither which plays at the position.  ???

 We also signed a Center who doesnt play Center.

 The answer? Draft a RG to play LT. Then draft a LG to play Center.

 THATS the Halas Hall way !

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 15, 2011, 02:21:57 am
Give me a top flight left tackle, a number 1 receiver and a legit NFL QB for backup. The O would be fine. The D? Another story, they worry me. Reality will soon set in, the core of our D will soon be over the hill..

Webb has been OK at LT this year.  Still got to cut down on the penalties but he hasn't had any games where he's imploded.  Having said that though if somehow an elite LT, like a Clady or an Okung, fell to us with our pick in the first round you take him.  Not likely though.

Next year, we'll have 4 picks in the first 100.  I wouldn't mind getting a DE at #1, a WR at #2, and a CB and O-lineman in round 3.  I'd target a veteran FA WR too as we might have 2 WR roster spots open to replace Roy Williams and Sanzenbacher.

Rounds 4 thru 7 you target LB (we also have the 6th rounder JT Thomas returning from IR),  a couple more  DBs, and maybe another QB.

We have a bunch of our own entering free agency.  I'd like to see Okoye back and Steltz possibly.   Corey Graham will draw interest around the league now that he has 3 picks to go with his super ST play.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 15, 2011, 08:05:13 am
I'm not sure how anyone can expect us to get a premier WR by waiting till the 2nd round. 

It would take a hell of an OC to turn a 2nd round WR into a stud contributor his rookie season. I mean yeah this draft is unusually deep with bigger, 4.5 type WRs but waiting till the mid-2nd round for that guy feels really risky to me.  You need a baseline level of talent to work with and more often than not those guys are found in the 1st round.

Not to mention the DE we draft would be the 3rd guy in the rotation.  Spending a mid-1st round pick for a part-time player doesn't make sense.  I think the smarter move would be to take our WR in the 1st and the DE in the 2nd instead of vice versa.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 15, 2011, 09:10:58 am

Based on the talent available you could flip flop the positions.  But if you look at the really good pass rushing DEs, not 3-4 OLBs, there's not that many in the league.  And I'd bet a good percentage of those were drafted in the first round.

Just about every team in the NFL has a quality WR, some of have 2.   One team I know has none.

Plus assuming you have a healthy Cutler who can by himself upgrade your talent level, it may knock the WR need to the 2nd round. 

And Idonijie and Peppers are both over 30 and that position is key to Lovie's defensive schemes.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 15, 2011, 09:28:04 am
From the research I've been doing, the DE pool this class is basically a two horse race.

Coples from UNC, and Ingram from South Carolina.

Coples is a Julius Peppers type (right down to the school and wearing #90).  At 6'6', 285 and 4.75 all the physical tools are there to dominate. There are some motor questions with him but he is the consensus top-rated DE and if he has a great workout he could easily be a Top 10 pick...  out of our reach.

Ingram is a tweener type (6'2, 275) with only average speed (4.8-ish) who has had one good year (this past one). He's a guy that plays better than his measurables (due largely to good technique), but you have to wonder it his lack of size will cause him problems at the next level and if that's a concern then I question his value as a 1st rounder.  The numbers he put up this season (9 sacks against top SEC competition) are certainly not to be dismissed but I look at this guy and I have John Thierry flashbacks, i.e., a guy who impressed in college but just can't translate to the NFL game.  Here's a scouting report if anyone wants to draw their own conclusions.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/college_player_scouting_report.html&player=35346
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 15, 2011, 09:53:08 am

Recall John Thierry went to an obscure school...I'm thinking Alcorn St.

DEs along with WRs are a total crapshoot in round 1 - probably comparable to selecting a QB.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on December 15, 2011, 10:57:47 am
Doesn't look so good for Hurd...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on December 15, 2011, 11:06:07 am
Nice knowing ya, Sammy...

 http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/12/former-dallas-cowboy-sam-hurd.html
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: UK on December 15, 2011, 12:59:17 pm
That's going to have serious effects throughout the NFL, rumors are saying that he supplied **** and marijuana to over 10+ other NFL athletes (who also likely intended to distribute).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Eastcoastfan on December 15, 2011, 01:02:15 pm
Boy, the Dallas contingent has really been a breath of fresh air for the Bears this year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 15, 2011, 01:24:44 pm
The new Joliet Jake.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Eastcoastfan on December 15, 2011, 01:36:08 pm
This is a quote from Roy Williams in a Sun Times article by Sean Jensen today:

It’s a moral victory, yet one that speaks to the character of the players the Bears have assembled.

“This is the best team I’ve been on,” said receiver Roy Williams, who is playing for his third franchise in his eighth NFL season. “Each year, the makeup is different. But this team is the best I’ve been on, period. You’ve got unselfish guys and guys who are accountable.

“Even if the guy didn’t mess up, he still blames himself.”

I am looking for RW to plead guilty to the indictment naming Hurd.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 15, 2011, 01:48:13 pm
The Bears are rapidly becoming this years version of the Vick Falcons. Minus an owner who cares about more than profits, of course.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 15, 2011, 04:13:10 pm
To RW: please stop talking and get off my team!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 15, 2011, 05:02:57 pm
Sounds like lots of other players will be going down.  Feds have a list of NFL players Hurd sold to and it is in the double digits.  Let's hope none of them are Bears Players.  Or at least not good Bears players.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: UK on December 15, 2011, 05:17:44 pm
I can only imagine what type of intimidation he'll be facing with the Mexican cartels?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 15, 2011, 06:26:41 pm
They will kill him while he is in prison if he rats on them.  Or they will kill his family. 

He was stupid to get involved with them.  He is a damn millionaire and still wanted more.  DUMBAZZ!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on December 15, 2011, 07:06:09 pm
Her's a guy the Bears should be after:

Written by

Rob Demovsky
Filed Under



Rookie receiver Tori Gurley turned down an offer earlier this week to sign with the Minnesota Vikings to instead stay on the Packers’ practice squad.
 
The Vikings offered him a spot on their active roster.
 
Gurley, who has been on the practice squad all season, said the Packers offered him a raise.
 
“If you look statistically, their season is going to be over in three weeks,” Gurley said of the Vikings. “We’re already locked to have a playoff spot.”
 
Gurley, an undrafted free agent from South Carolina, said he has had other calls this season from teams who have expressed an interest in signing him to their active roster but has turned them down.
 
“I’m learning from some of the best receivers in the game right now,” Gurley said. “The way our offense is clicking, the grass isn’t going to be greener on the other side. So just learning and taking it one day at a time, my opportunity is going to come.”
 
The Packers chose not to add a receiver to the 53-man roster this week even after Greg Jennings sustained a knee injury against the Raiders last Sunday. Jennings will most likely miss the remainder of the regular season but is expected to return for the playoffs.
 
However, there could be an opportunity for Gurley with the Packers next season, considering veteran receiver Donald Driver, at age 36, might be nearing the end of his career.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 16, 2011, 01:20:34 am
Stay and get a ring or leave and go to some scrub team...gee,tough choice...NOT....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 16, 2011, 04:33:27 am
I didn't know they could turn down offers like that... he probably gets a raise every time another team calls
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on December 16, 2011, 07:40:23 am
do they get a ring if they are on the practice squad? I would doubt it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 16, 2011, 07:55:07 am
Funny how the year came crashing down with 3 losses that we all thought would be 3 wins..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 16, 2011, 08:00:14 am
Looks like somebody didn't do his due diligence on Sam Hurd and now the Bears if not the entire league will be under the spotlight.

This is Angelo's biggest ****kup yet and it seems to me he has two choices:  resign, or be fired. If the McCaskeys won't fire for years of gross incompetence in personnel matters, they certainly need to offer someone up for this PR fiasco and Angelo is the obvious choice.

As embarrassing as this is for a Bears franchise that is already a league laughingstock, the silver lining to all this may be that real changes are finally made at the higher levels of the organization.  The McCaskeys may forgive screwups like this but I'm not so sure the league office will...  especially if these charges have legs and start casting a wide net.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 16, 2011, 08:07:54 am
Are you saying Angelo knew about this and signed him anyway?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 16, 2011, 08:13:27 am
Are you saying Angelo knew about this and signed him anyway?

Well, there are two possible scenarios.

1) Angelo didn't know about this part of Hurd's life.  From what I've read, these things were already circulating around Hurd while he was still with the Cowboys.  It should not have taken a lot of effort to uncover what was going on.

2) Angelo knew Hurd was mixed up in this stuff and signed him anyway. 

The first one is a fail in due diligence, the second is a fail in judgment.  Either way it's grounds for Angelo's dismissal the way I see it, and I can't believe the Bears front office seems to be getting a free pass on this whole thing.  Maybe harboring felons on your team isn't such a big deal with people anymore. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 16, 2011, 08:18:07 am
You give Angelo too much credit
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 16, 2011, 09:24:33 am
Wonder if Barber is one of the clients - might explain some erratic behavior
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 16, 2011, 09:31:26 am
Well, there are two possible scenarios.

1) Angelo didn't know about this part of Hurd's life.  From what I've read, these things were already circulating around Hurd while he was still with the Cowboys.  It should not have taken a lot of effort to uncover what was going on.


Never heard any such thing down here in Dallas.  Cowboys wanted Hurd back but the Bears told him he'd get a chance to play WR so he signed with the Bears - probably for more money too.

2) Angelo knew Hurd was mixed up in this stuff and signed him anyway.


After what happened with Tank Johnson and Cedric Benson, I'd bet the Bears checked Hurd out and didn't find any red flags before signing him .  Do you think the Feds asked Angelo if they could bug Hurd's helmet?   

The first one is a fail in due diligence, the second is a fail in judgment.  Either way it's grounds for Angelo's dismissal the way I see it, and I can't believe the Bears front office seems to be getting a free pass on this whole thing.  Maybe harboring felons on your team isn't such a big deal with people anymore

There's enough evidence to provide grounds for Angelo's dismissal - this ain't one of them.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 16, 2011, 09:38:21 am
I would be a lot more inclined to believe Roy Williams was a client of Hurd's, than Barber.

It would go a long way toward explaining the schizoid nature of his performances as well as the off-the-wall things he's said to the media over the years. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 16, 2011, 09:59:45 am
No way is Angelo held accountable for Hurd's actions..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 16, 2011, 10:05:08 am
No way is Angelo held accountable for Hurd's actions..

Are you saying he shouldn't be held accountable?  Or that he should, but won't be?

I guess if it turns out that half the Bears roster is made up of drug addicts that would go a long way to explaining a lot of things the past few years.

My point is that a lot of people (including some on this board) have felt for quite some time that there are things significantly wrong in Halas Hall, that Lovie has been covering over a lot of stuff and that it's high time to start peeling the skin back and seeing what's underneath -- ugly as it may be. If the Hurd incident isn't evidence on its own that a lot of things need fixed, it at least provides the pretext for putting the Bears management under a microscope, which is years if not decades overdue.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on December 16, 2011, 10:54:26 am
In related news, Roy Williams is being indicted for not taking "performance enhancing drugs" the last few seasons.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 16, 2011, 11:07:23 am
There's enough evidence to provide grounds for Angelo's dismissal - this ain't one of them.

Agreed. His stupid personnel moves alone are enough to get him fired. IMHO Angelo is too stupid to have known Hurd was a drug dealer.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 16, 2011, 11:10:27 am
In related news, Roy Williams is being indicted for not taking "performance enhancing drugs" the last few seasons.....

If I were to drug test right now in light of this action by the Feds would be to test Roy Williams. He'd be my #1 likely candidate.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 16, 2011, 12:59:57 pm
Telander editorial.  I think the one thing you really don't do is embarass the owners.  The Jer my get tossed under the bus if it gets worse.

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/9468870-419/bears-shouldve-been-more-careful-before-signing-sam-hurd.html
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 16, 2011, 01:36:33 pm
This will be really interesting if the Bears organization starts getting called-out nationwide because of this.

We all know that any of the McCaskeys would sooner undergo a root canal without anesthetic than dismiss anyone in the front office.  On the other hand this has the potential to bring a whole new level of embarrassment to the franchise name beyond how they play on the field.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 16, 2011, 01:42:39 pm
They have to be praying for a win this weekend so they can say the playoffs are still an option, although in reality no chance.  But at least they can deflect attention away.  It will be interesting to see how special teams does sunday. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on December 16, 2011, 02:05:19 pm
would seem that we would have heard about Hurd's issues

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-1216-haugh-hurd-bears-chicago--20111216,0,1022866.column
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 16, 2011, 02:23:14 pm

Poor article by Haugh.  How would the deluded Bears teammates to know that Hurd was dealing?  What does a drug dealer look like - Scarface?

And how would Angelo and the Bears know that Hurd was stopped by the cops - was that public information?  The papers certainly didn't know about it did they?

The NFL has about 2000 players - there's bound to be a small percentage that have performed or are performing some sort of illegal or immoral acts.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on December 16, 2011, 02:29:13 pm
What's with the jab at Cutler about "snubbing a respected medical team"?  Going to a doctor of your choice to perform surgery is hardly a negative...or at least it shouldn't be.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 16, 2011, 02:50:32 pm
And if the Bears' medical team is "respected"...  I beg to differ.

As do Tommie Harris, Marc Colombo, Curtis Enis, Mike Brown, etc.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 16, 2011, 05:50:44 pm
To me, the Hurd thing is a non issue. I would rather focus on the fact that we don't have a backup qb of NFL caliber, or that we continue to trot Hester out making believe he's a quality nfl receiver, mainly 'cause we have none..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 16, 2011, 07:17:38 pm
espn reported Hurd's been cut. whatever money he has will disappear like a snowball in a furnace. uh, GAR ON TEED Bear money. Blah. What a group. nfl version of dunder mifflin.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 16, 2011, 08:03:14 pm
Quote
Funny how the year came crashing down with 3 losses that we all thought would be 3 wins

I'd laugh if I weren't already crying....being at the game where he got injured and the season at the time we thought was looking fantastic SUCKS! Leaves nothing but a terrible taste in my mouth for the offseason....I don't give two rats backsides about any draft this or that. Figures I'd get to see the game that ruined our season......
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 16, 2011, 10:31:19 pm
Yep, I like the rest of you guys, thinking about the playoffs. Heck, I even dreamed of Green Bay stumbling and the game on Christmas meaning something. Boy did I have to wake up!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 17, 2011, 07:26:33 am
Angelo may very well lose his job this year or retire.  I doubt he is fired unless another report surfaces that he was aware and ignored it.  I think everyone can be critical in foresight and hindsight of some of his moves.  One thing I highly doubt is that he covered this up in any fashion.  He has always been a stand up guy, like him as a GM or not.

I'd like to see the article that was circulating regarding Hurd's dealings being known for some time while with the Cowboys, prior to signing with the Bears.  I can't seem to find it.  Some people seem to have sources that none of us have access to...

What I have read on multiple sites was that Hurd was stopped with $88K and a marijuana plant in his car two days before signing.  Homeland Security obviously didn't share that info with the Bears, but if they did... off with all of their heads.  But maybe that will come out in the coming weeks and months, that would be epic and damaging on the Bear's organization and the NFL.  My gut tells me we will not hear that the Bears knew about this.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 17, 2011, 07:28:51 am
Apparently can't type "maryjane" on this forum  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 17, 2011, 08:55:12 am
The evil weed..... reefer madness.  I guess a drug dealer looks like, well Sam Hurd. The front office is looking like rotting ice in the spring. A couple of more revelations and everybody had better duck.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 17, 2011, 10:19:23 am
WTF?  Go see Cutlers doctor for sure not the Bears quacks:

Rookie Gabe Carimi is still on track to return during the 2012 season. But as he heals, Carimi might need one more surgery, according to a league source. The exact nature of the procedure, however, isn’t known.
 
Carimi had an assortment of knee injuries at Wisconsin, and he dislocated his kneecap in the second quarter of the second game of the season in New Orleans. He tried to return during the Bears’ bye week, but he had a setback and underwent arthroscopic surgery Nov. 11 to clean up debris in a knee. Carimi was put on injured reserve Nov. 18.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 17, 2011, 11:02:42 am
I'm sick of hearing about Tebow. I mean c'mon!!! I give him the one long bomb that should've gone for a TD. MOst of the rest of his throws were wobbly at best and off the mark. If we were at full strength, Tebow would be an after thought..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 17, 2011, 11:27:43 am
I just can't get over how unprepared this team is in regard to the backup QB position. Wouldn't they have learned a lesson from last season? And you have to wonder, is it the player, or is it this coaching staff? And how about WR? Fukking Johnny Knox wouldn't know the correct route to run if it fell on his head. How many of Cutlers Int's happened when throwing to Knox? Let's quit with the trick plays in the backfield with Hester. And one of the best FA pickups we got, doesn't understand the fundamentals of football (I still think he's a good hard playing football player that I'd want on my football team every time). If Angelo goes, he needs to take Lovie with him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 17, 2011, 10:50:38 pm
I'm sick of hearing about Tebow. I mean c'mon!!! I give him the one long bomb that should've gone for a TD. MOst of the rest of his throws were wobbly at best and off the mark. If we were at full strength, Tebow would be an after thought..

 Chifan we won that game for 58 minutes, I just knew we were going to win.

 BUT THEN CAME TEJUS ... and the Lord sayth : "Let there be a prevent Defense!"

 And it was made so.  :P
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 18, 2011, 01:13:05 am
Don't forget 'and let the running back known as Barber screw up twice and ruineth and chances the Bear team hath'......
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on December 18, 2011, 10:54:11 am
It was over when Cutler broke his thumb, but the mistakes of the past few weeks (and the ex-Cowboy **** ups in particular) have just made it even worse than it should've been....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 18, 2011, 11:14:03 am
All they had to do was win 3 games out of 6.  They dropped three in a row when two should have been as easy a win as youi can get in the NFL. 

Now they need to win three in a row (yeah right) and one is against undefeated Green Bay in their house.  That was going to be tough with Cutler and Forte.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 18, 2011, 11:15:30 am
Face it the Chicago bears have **** the bed!!!

I will watch todays game but I know it is a loss before it starts.  Heck even if they scrape out an ugly win what difference does it make?  There will be no playoffs for the Bears this year.  Even if the stars aligned and they got in due to other teams messing up they would lose the first game in embarrassing fashion.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Eastcoastfan on December 18, 2011, 02:58:32 pm
They can't bring Angelo back after this, can they?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 18, 2011, 03:22:30 pm
Um, they lost 4 in a row.  And McCown doesnt look any better than Hanie.  I really like the forfiet the next two game idea. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 18, 2011, 03:42:38 pm
I just want to remind everyone of the names of the 3 QBs who ended our playoff drive:

- Tyler Palko

- Tim Tebow

- Tavares Jackson

Say what you want about Hanie and our offense -- and they have been deplorable -- but when your team supposedly has a championship caliber defense and those three QBs beat you...  it's not just the offense's fault. 

STs have also tanked badly the last few weeks.

These last few weeks have been an epic fail by every person in the Bears organization from the McCaskeys right on down.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 18, 2011, 03:46:05 pm
the 46 in a flash of drunken insight notes that the letter ''t'' starts the qb's first names.  i think the bears are clean from here on out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 18, 2011, 04:29:00 pm
Yeah, our championship defense gave up how many points today?  Granted the Offense didnt help, but just saying.  We got way out coached in the second half, hands down. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 18, 2011, 04:36:39 pm
That first possession of the 3rd quarter by Seattle was flat-out disastrous by our D and pretty much set the tone for the whole 2nd half.

You let the other team go down the field uncontested for a score to start the 2nd half, and you're pretty much gonna be in a dogfight the rest of the game no matter what the halftime score was.

Our D has some stretches were they play pretty decent but they have not been "championship caliber" since we had Urlacher, Tommie Harris and Mike Brown all in their prime.  On a game-in and game-out basis, this Bears D is barely a top-half unit. When they're really on they're probably the 7th or 8th best defense in the league and when they're off they're down there in the mid-20s if not lower.  They've ridden on their rep for quite awhile already and it cracks me up that the media still buys into it as much as they do.  Just cause you've got an all-world DE, a couple very good LBs and 1 decent (sometimes) CB, that doesn't count for much.  The D still has to excel as a unit and that doesn't happen often enough with today's Bears to consider it a top-tier unit by any stretch.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 18, 2011, 07:17:28 pm
The Bears got out coached.  Flat out that is what happened.  Sure the players have to make the plays and all that but some times the coaches do not put the players in the best position to make the plays.

Carroll and his staff adjusted both their defense and offense at the half.  From that point on they owned the Bears.



 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 18, 2011, 07:41:19 pm
Did anybody notice that only 3 or 4 were rushing the QB and sacking Hanie? And we dont need to remake the Oline?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 18, 2011, 08:32:12 pm
On a different note.

I hope Knox has a succesful surgery.  He is having a surgery to stabalize vertabrae in his back.  That hit was wicked and I wish him all the best.

It looked like nothing in real time but the replay showed just how badly his spine was bent back and twisted.  I am more worried about him being able to do everything day to day with out pain more then I am about wether he can play football again.  I hope he makes a full recovery.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 19, 2011, 05:07:02 am
I agree! Looked bad, your body wasn't meant to bend like that..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 19, 2011, 08:22:44 am
I hope Knox can come back.  But whether he can or not, a franchise caliber WR still remains this team's #1 need.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 19, 2011, 08:24:56 am
He should be done for the season. Another one bites the dust.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 19, 2011, 08:33:17 am
These last two games are looking brutal.

No QB.  No deep threats at WR. And an OL that is getting worse by the game.

I put the over-under for points scored by our offense the rest of this season at about 11.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 19, 2011, 09:06:14 am
Even with a deep threat at WR, we have no QB to throw him the ball..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 19, 2011, 09:07:25 am
It's going to be a slaughter this weekend.. Of course there is one  thing, GB's line is hurting..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 19, 2011, 09:29:16 am
Generally, when a team drops the last 6 games of the season...  essentially giving away a playoff spot in the process...  somebody loses their job because of it.  Either the HC, or the GM.  In a really well-run organization that is truly committed to winning, both are let go.

Unfortunately I doubt that this late season debacle will bring serious consequences to either Lovie or Angelo.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 19, 2011, 09:32:52 am
I think Angelo will retire...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on December 19, 2011, 09:38:06 am
Martz is the scapegoat to cover the Bears' Front office asses......

He was going to leave anyway (thankfully refused his contract extension).....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on December 19, 2011, 10:22:53 am
I would really like to know if Lovie is just being a good soldier by saying he felt comfortable with Hanie and McCown or if he really believed it. I'm betting that Angelo told him that this is what you've got...deal with it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 19, 2011, 10:48:10 am
I blame 'em both. No way do I give Lovie a pass. And I agree, my bet is Martz won't be back..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 19, 2011, 11:02:07 am
I hope everyone will be back, and this is why. Bring everyone back, let 'em make one last run. If there's no success, fire everyone and start the rebuilding. I hate to see guys like Urlacher and Briggs have to start over, and I don't see either of them being around much longer. Lovie's going nowhere, not right now anyway.

I personally am ready for a change, but I don't want one just for the sake of changing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 19, 2011, 11:26:27 am
Anybody notice how Tim Ryan kept pointing out in the second half how every time the went to the Cover-2 SEA made plays.  Lovie/Marinelli dont learn/adapt and Pete Carroll does. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on December 19, 2011, 11:42:39 am
I am ready for change.  We have the first QB in my lifetime other than Jim McMahon capable of running a modern passing offense and lighting it up! I don't want to waste one more year of Jay Cutler's career in the hope that next year, AngeloRuskelLovie can figure it out.  Nothing makes me think that after 8- and 10 years between The Jer and Lovely that the light will go on.  They won't figure out SCOUTING,DRAFTING and DEVELOPING back-up players.  They won't figure out GETTING THE PLAY IN, IN-GAME ADJUSTMENTS and CLOCK-MANAGEMENT, they won't suddenly devise INNOVATIVE and CONTEMPORARY schemes to go after another teams weaknesses.  They just won't ...  and it is time for Bears ownership to realize it.  Green Bay is about to win their 2nd SB in 2 seasons and they are among the youngest teams in the league.  We are not in their class anymore and Lovie said that beating Green Bay is job #1.  We, will have lost 4 straight to the cheese heads ... no end in sight fellas, no end to it in sight. 
 
George ... it's time to put your stamp on this team and begin anew. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 19, 2011, 11:57:11 am
I hope everyone will be back, and this is why. Bring everyone back, let 'em make one last run.

I disagree.  Absolute bare minimum Martz has got to go, and Angelo too.

Martz for not designing a scheme to protect and utilize Cutler, and Angelo for not putting solid players around him at WR and on the OL.

Those two clowns have squandered two prime years of our franchise QB's career. I don't want them around to waste a third.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on December 19, 2011, 12:25:42 pm
Merril Hoge called them out on it on NFL matchup too...

Said Bears and Vikings BOTH went to cover-2 in the final quarter against the TEBOWS - and LOST

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 19, 2011, 01:12:07 pm
Seems any more like any team that plays the Cover-2 is asking to lose.

Every scheme becomes beatable at some point...  the Cover-2 is definitely in that category.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 19, 2011, 01:34:35 pm
I'm sick of this D, not the players, the scheme!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 19, 2011, 02:31:43 pm
Well I am not really looking forward to Ruskell taking Angelos place.  Can we add him to the list of people to get canned? 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 19, 2011, 02:35:41 pm
Yeah Ruskell is as inept as Angelo.  Possibly worse.  To this day he is known to Seattle fans as "Timmy NoSkill".
 
I try not to even think about that cause it's just too depressing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 19, 2011, 05:05:36 pm
If you do not like the cover two then Lovie has to go. 

I hate the scheme because every single QB in the league can destroy it.  With the talent the Bears have on D they should be a top 10 defense.  They are terrible.

I am ready for Lovie to go. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 19, 2011, 06:38:57 pm
Some of the announcers talk about how great our D is, we're not even in the top half..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 19, 2011, 06:40:52 pm
I put the over-under for points scored by our offense the rest of this season at about 11.

Right, a defensive safety and 3 Gould FGs. And maybe net even 3 of them. Yuck
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 19, 2011, 06:43:19 pm
Even with a deep threat at WR, we have no QB to throw him the ball..

Well maybe Hanie could provided the OLine could block to protect him long enough and the WRs could get any separation, which they cant
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 19, 2011, 06:45:43 pm
I think Angelo will retire...

We can only hope and pray and that he takes his butt buddy with him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 19, 2011, 07:01:42 pm
I don't disagree about the O line, but Hanie hasn't helped. Through all of this, it's become obvious how good Cutler is, he's masked alot..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 20, 2011, 01:11:16 am

What is really frustrating about our defense at times is the opponent's wide open receivers.   When Jackson wasn't under pressure he was able to complete easy passes because our defenders play off the receiver so much.   And Seattle appeared to be getting the ball out quickly too.

I can't tell how much we played cover 2 Sunday - maybe we played more because we had Conte out, but Jackson threw it away when pressured and gave up just the one sack and was able to hang in there enough times to complete 60% of his passes with no INTs.

I understand the cover 2 can be effective at times, but its frustrating watching our safeties play like scarecrows rarely given the opportunity to make a play on the ball.

Watching our offense, the other team's DBs frequently are glued to our receivers.  Rarely any separation.  And that was OK when you had a guy like Cutler who was aggressive and had the arm to back it up.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 20, 2011, 01:20:43 am
This is a team that has given up on its coach. Just no way we go from winning all those games to flopping terribly against lowball competition. Three losses in a row to teams we should easily beat. Well,four really. Seattle ain't crap either. Raiders were the toughest of em. But of the four teams, we should have come out 3-1. They've given up on Lovie and his staff. Lovie's gotta go and take everyone with....it's Cowa time!! Bring him in, give him the keys to the kingdom and watch this thing turn around right now!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 20, 2011, 08:18:40 am
We really really need to get rid of Darryl Drake the WR coach.  Especially before we draft/aquire a #1 WR. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 20, 2011, 08:19:03 am
This is a team that has given up on its coach.

Thank you for saying that.  I've been thinking the same thing the last few weeks and no one seems to want to say the Bears have quit but I mean... come on.  The way this team has played since Cutler went down says it all.  They're heads just haven't been in the games and even units that were formerly rock solid (Special Teams) have tailed off big time.

It just seems like a lot of our players really need a big shake-up.  Especially the veterans and specifically the defensive core guys like Urlacher, Briggs and Peanut.  They need someone to take the helm with some new ideas, some energy, and a commitment to putting them in the best positions to succeed which Lovie and his staff have routinely been terrible at.   

With those three guys and Peppers, there is talent here to re-make this D into a really good unit still...  possibly even on the level of say, the 49ers.  But the window on all of those guys is closing age-wise and I'm afraid if we stay with the same ol same ol then we've probably seen the best of what they can do, individually and as a unit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 20, 2011, 08:38:23 am
You know what? I am very doubtful they have given up on their coach. I find that hard to believe. They knew they had a chance for the playoffs and imploded. I think there was pressure after Jay went down and they just tried to do too much that they made mistakes they wouldnt ordinarily make. Or they felt their chances of making the playoffs were nill after Jay went down and let down. I dont think the coaching angle entered into it. But maybe the lack of getting a high caliber backup when Jay went down did have an effect on the players. Maybe that caused the letdown.

Its crystal clear to me that changes need to be made. Angelo and Ruskell need to go. Knowing the McCaskets wont pay for 2 coaches at the same time, I dont expect the Wooden Indian to be canned or for him to quit, although I believe we absolutely need a new coaching staff. We really need to clean house.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on December 20, 2011, 08:43:32 am
But maybe the lack of getting a high caliber backup when Jay went down did have an effect on the players. Maybe that caused the letdown.




ding, ding, ding....we have a winner. Thank you Jerry Angelo
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 20, 2011, 08:48:23 am
Which is why Angelo's personnel failures have finally shown themselves to the point that a GM change is clearly needed. Now we have been saying the same thing for years, but nothing has happened.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 20, 2011, 08:50:06 am
F**k...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-1220-bears-carimi--20111220,0,5557730.story

It's Marc Colombo all over again.

Carimi seems like a good kid and a decent player when healthy.  It's too bad he's probably destined to be one of those guys that can make it through 5 or 6 games a season and then has to hang it up altogether after 3-4 years. 

We might want to draft another RT this year just to hedge our bets.

The other question is, why wasn't this done 2 months ago already?  He'd be that much farther along in his recovery by now.  More mismanagement and bungling by the Bears' crack (make that, quack) medical staff.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on December 20, 2011, 10:00:04 am
Its a symbiotic relationship- GM and coach and coach and players. When one **** up, the other can sometimes cover and make up for the screw up. When BOTH keep screwing up however.... you have the Bears.....

Of course the players like Lovie. Who wouldn't ? He treats them like adults, cover's their butts when they fail (that symbiotic relationship thing). That is a positive, until it becomes neccessary ALL THE TIME.

Could they do worse if they cleaned house ? Yes.

Are they any better than an average to above average team if they stand pat ?  No.

The only way to break the cycle is to clean house.

It won't happen though, and at least Urlacher/Briggs/Peppers/Tillman may get at least 1 more shot at the brass ring needing EVERYTHING to go right for it to happen (see 2006)....

The clock is as 11:59 for this defense and the clock is staring to chime.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 20, 2011, 10:13:48 am
Urlacher, Briggs, Peppers and the rest of the long-timers on the Bears need to realize that while it may be very "comfortable" and pleasant to play for Lovie Smith...  they are not going to win a ring with him.  I suspect that at least some of them have probably already figured that out.

The thing is, as good as the Packers are (and as good as the Lions are becoming) I'm not sure any HC could come in here and have this team ready to compete for another NFC North title in anything less than 3 years.  There are simply not enough quality football players on the current roster, not to mention the need for a total culture change which takes a couple of seasons under the best of circumstances.   

We also need to really put the training, conditioning and medical staffs of the Bears under the microscope when reviewing this season. The number of player games lost to injuries this season has been ridiculous and virtually no position on the team has been spared.  Some of that may just be bad luck but certainly not all of it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 20, 2011, 10:19:17 am
Gentlemen...  meet AngiRuskell's big WR acquisition for 2012:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/20/braylon-edwards-was-a-healthy-scratch-monday/

You heard it here first.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 20, 2011, 11:39:40 am
Maybe cheap? HMMM, I dont know. I would certainly hope for better unless he is a Roy Williams replacement.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 20, 2011, 11:43:28 am
Braylon will be brought in (on the cheap) to replace Roy Williams in 2012, and the results will be exactly the same. 

They are essentially the same player at this point in their careers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 20, 2011, 12:15:01 pm
No doubt Edwards would come cheaper than Vincent Jackson, but thats who I would go after. Daammnn the money! We are so far below the cap all us board members could take wheel barrows full of money home
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on December 20, 2011, 06:48:07 pm
This is a team that has given up on its coach.

I disagree.  After J-Cut was injured the team came to play.  Only problem is Angelo put his eggs in Hanie's basket and that doomed the team.  They could've beaten the Raiders and SHOULD'VE beaten the Chiefs and Broncos if not for bad and inexperienced play from Hanie.

Now I would agree they gave up last Sunday but I don't believe they quit on Lovie the last few games I mentioned. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 20, 2011, 09:08:21 pm
The guy really was awful. Bears rode that train right over the cliff. I think someone already posted to the effect "would Mcnabb really have been THAT bad?  Clearly someone in Bears management/family simply didn't want the guy around. Why, I don't know.  Doesn't matter one way or the other now. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 21, 2011, 01:21:24 pm
McCown to start.  He cant be any worse than Hanie, right???  Then again I am thinking draft pick so so be it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 21, 2011, 01:52:43 pm
Notes from Fuktardia. The Jer is "dissapointed". "we imploded in some cases". Ah thats it. The fatal old "implosion".  Fraud.  All praise for the Martz "system".  Cale's replacement has been in the "system"!  All will be well!  Josh will defeat the hated Packers! mmmmmmmmmm......no.  The few plays I saw him in, he looked like a stick man with a helmet. Someone posted the team's laid down on Lovie.  Probably. I would too if I thought we were viewed by the rest of the nfl as the Washington Generals.  Does the buffoonery continue with George?  If all that goon is interested in is the golf scores, for sure.  Don't rock the boat George, don't mess with the money.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 21, 2011, 05:24:35 pm
So...  is it terrible to hope we lose in epic fashion Sunday night?

I mean...  if it takes a 56-3 beatdown on primetime national TV to jolt the McCaskeys into taking the necessary steps this offseason...  then I say bring it on.

As for me...  I'll be mixing a stiff drink, settling in with the wife and watching a Christmas movie or two that night.  3 1/2 hours of Christmas Day is way too valuable to waste watching Josh McClown in what promises to be a train wreck of historic proportions.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 21, 2011, 06:50:08 pm
I'l probably watch. I cant say I wont  change the channel if the Packers begin to roll.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 21, 2011, 06:52:11 pm
I'll watch and I will root for the Bears to win.  If they lay down like they did last week I will eventually change the channel when it gets out of hand.

I am also rooting for a big HUGE wicked hit on Rodgers.  That will keep me watching until it gets so far out of hand that Rodgers is pulled. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 21, 2011, 10:17:47 pm
Just can't do it....saw enough blowout losses to those suckers. Can't do it...can't put myself through that crap again. Let em sink...and with them, HOPEFULLY Angielow with. If it's a epic blowout, someone's gotta go and that would be a good thing for next season. Addition by subtraction...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on December 21, 2011, 10:33:23 pm
The defense is ranked #10 in points per game allowed.

The offense was pretty good until Cutler got hurt.

Do you really thinks it's possible they will clean house because the Packers blow them out?

I doubt it could happen.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 21, 2011, 11:04:39 pm
I want Angelo gone....I and probably most Bears fans would be happy with that move alone. Some would argue Martz, too....I'd probably agree with this.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on December 22, 2011, 05:13:36 am

 The GM, the coaching staff,whos coming along?

 Look at Houston.

 Despite injurys they are making strides.

 Thats where we should be.

 They can plug in anything and keep going forward.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 22, 2011, 06:07:00 am
Mainly the QB position. We could get by at RB postion til Forte got back, but Hanie just absolutely killed us..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 22, 2011, 08:03:32 am
Angelo and Martz have to go.

Angelo's many failures are self evident and have only been magnified by our late season meltdown.

Martz and Cutler have somehow managed to co-exist but it is clearly not a good fit and one that has had to be forced every step of the way.

Cutler deserves to work with an OC that will mold the offense to his skills.  And allow him to audible at the line.  The number of timeouts we've had to burn just cause Martz called the wrong play for the D that was presented is ridicuous.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on December 22, 2011, 08:54:30 am
If a GM is hired from outside the organization they will hire their own new coaching staff. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 22, 2011, 09:00:34 am
The new GM is already in house.  The Jers little me.  complete with bozo shoes, makeup, and clown nose. One less thing for the McCaskeys to worry about, and, the money keeps coming in.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 22, 2011, 09:34:15 am
The new GM is already in house.  The Jers little me.  complete with bozo shoes, makeup, and clown nose. One less thing for the McCaskeys to worry about, and, the money keeps coming in.

You are probably correct, but that thought makes me vomit
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 22, 2011, 10:14:57 am
Look at Houston.

 Despite injurys they are making strides.


Same deal with the Chiefs.

Lost their QB, lost their starting RB, lost their best DB and I think a couple other decent players IIRC ...  but hung in there, upset the Pack are are still in the hunt.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 22, 2011, 10:19:20 am
You are probably correct, but that thought makes me vomit.

Yup.  Look at how bad the Seahawks have been the last few years and that's exactly where we're headed if the succession from Angelo to NoSkill goes as planned.

A boring, non-explosive offense, bottom-5 OL, a weak, old and undersized defense...  that's what the Seahawks were when NoSkill finally got the boot. Of course the Bears are well down that path already so there may not be that much farther to fall.

I really think that next year will determine the next 3 to 5 years of this franchise if not longer.  If we can find some playmakers on both sides of the ball, upgrade our depth big-time, keep our good players healthy and somehow inject some brains and balls into our coaching staff, we can be right back in the playoff hunt next year.  OTOH if those things don't happen then I think it's gonna be the beginning of the end and this team could get really bad in a hurry and be that way for a long time. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on December 22, 2011, 11:16:04 am
Until ratings of defenses give significant value to takeaways I regard them as an unreliable gage.  GB defense has a lowly rated defense.

KC ran up a lot of yardage against GB but after 4 trips inside the GB 5 yard line they got 12 points.  Finally, on the fifth trip they got a TD.  Guess the GB D was just getting tired out after the offense kept handing the ball over after all those 3 and outs.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 22, 2011, 11:26:37 am
I also tend to disregard defensive rankings that are based on points allowed because they don't factor out points scored by the other team on offensive turnovers, or points scored on STs.  Neither of which the D has any control over at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 22, 2011, 12:26:49 pm
The OL has looked mediocre to awful since Cutler and Forte went down. That being said, I actually don't think the unit is that far away.

OT - Webb and Lance Louis got us by with Cutler but have taken turns failing badly since. We need consistently better play at both T positions regardless of the QB.  Webb doesn't have the feet to get it done against speed rushers on the blindside.  I'm not sure Carimi does either but if simply flipping them would solve the problem, so much the better.  Otherwise it looks like we'll need a LT via draft or FA and Webb takes OMG's spot as the swing backup.

OG - Pretty decent batch of bodies here ASSUMING C. Williams comes back healthy and Lance Louis moves back inside. I see Edwin Williams and Roberto Garza as our backups at OG for 2012.  The exception being if the OG from Stanford were available, who is the consensus best OG to come out in several years and would be our best interior O-Lineman from Day One.

C - As I've stated before, I believe Chris Spencer will be given the chance to compete for his natural position (C) next year, and that he will beat out Garza (who will remain as a valuable backup at both the C and G positions and a mentor to the younger guys).

The other thing that IMO is necessary to get this unit to a consistently passable level is an OC that works with Tice (instead of against him), and who understands what our OL can and can't do and plans to those strengths.  There are clearly some talent deficiencies on the OL (especially minus C. Williams and Carimi), but those weaknesses have been exposed all the more by Martz' bad scheme.

Bottom line being, if Mike Adams (2nd ranked OT) and/or David DeCastro (top ranked OG) fell to our draft position I think we would have to give them serious consideration...  but if the 1st or 2nd best WR, DE or CB were also there, we could maybe give those positions priority.  So much depends on the health of C. Williams and Carimi -- along with not knowing who our OC will be next year -- that it's extremely hard at this point to know how close we are (or aren't) with regard to OL personnel. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on December 22, 2011, 01:02:25 pm
I'm wondering if part of the problem with the O-line after Cutler went down is the lack of experience from the QB position. Cutler recognized defenses and could point out where the rush was likely to come from. Hanie didn't have the experience to do that. Our O-line is still pretty young and inexperienced except for Garza.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 22, 2011, 01:20:03 pm
Keys, that's a good point.  And even Garza is "inexperienced" in the fact that he is a career OG playing C this year for the first time by necessity.  It may be that between he and Cutler they could get the protection schemes right most of the time.  But when Garza had to tackle the line calls alone it wasn't gonna happen because of his lack of experience at the position.  Also we have seen that Hanie's pocket presence is abysmal and a QB that can't manuever in the pocket is going to compromise your OL no matter how good of horses you have up front.

This much we've learned about Cutler.  Not only is he tough as nails, he has a pretty damn good mind for the game of football.  The fact that that component of his skill set has been taken out of the equation by Martz' "no audible" system I find particularly nauseating... and I hope will be rectified by our new OC.  How many points have we left on the field the last 2 years because Cutler couldn't change things up at the line?  How many turnovers could have been avoided by checking out of plays that were doomed to fail?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on December 22, 2011, 06:41:58 pm
Vince Lombardi contended that an interception was worth 40 yards.  For each interception subtact 40 yards from the defensive team's yield.

Also you can subtract 40 yards from an offense's yield for each interception yielded.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 23, 2011, 06:35:07 am
Looks like the bloom is starting to fall of the Texan's rose.  Tough defense and a running game can't mask the QB position...

And in other news, Barkley states he will return to USC and the Colts are playing their way out of the Luck sweepstakes...  Talk about a horrible win
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 23, 2011, 08:33:21 am
Didnt they just get only their first win of the season? I think they are still in control of the worst record
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on December 23, 2011, 09:12:27 am

Colts, Vikes and Rams all have 2 wins.  Not sure who has the advantage with strength of schedule but the Colts do play in a weaker division.  Also Rams and Vikes recently spent #1s on QB.

Have any of you guys seen Baylor's Robert Griffin play?  If not make sure you catch the Alamo Bowl game on Dec 29 and tell me what you think.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on December 23, 2011, 10:41:29 am
But Rams and Vikes would probably trade the pick so that doesn't help Indy
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 23, 2011, 10:45:39 am
Indy needs a lot of help, not just QB. This draft will be really loaded with gamechangers.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 23, 2011, 11:16:08 am
Peyton Manning Masked a lot on that team. I always thought Dungy was OK, not some great coach that some like to make him out to be.









Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on December 23, 2011, 11:27:45 am
we have a host of issues right now.
With Hanie in, teams aren't afraid of him so they stack the box more than they did.
We can't run or pass.
If they stacked the box too much against Cutler he could make them pay.
I expect Williams being out is affecting Webb a good bit as well.

If I am playing the bears, I stack the box and blitz most of the LBers.
Having a 7 man rush will fill up most holes and put Hanie on the run. He hasn't shown he can beat the blitz so you keep blitzing him.
I would do the same thing to McCown until he made you pay.

With the draft, that first pick has to be BPA with some regard to need.
We need everything except QB and possibly RB right now. Even our other solid players are getting old enough we need to get guys in here that will be ready to fill their shoes. Everything is open.

The second and 3rd picks can be more for need but that #1 must be BPA or trade down.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 23, 2011, 11:43:34 am
Peyton Manning Masked a lot on that team. I always thought Dungy was OK, not some great coach that some like to make him out to be.

Absolutely he did and this current HC isnt near the coach Dungy was
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: hibernationsuxs on December 24, 2011, 07:16:45 am
Dallas,

I have watch RBG III play.  It was a game early in this season.  He was flat out awesome!  I remember thinking this kid is going to win heisman this year....no kidding.

I personally believe he has got the "it", that little something that Qb's need to be successful.  His leadership and competitiveness is what sticks out the most to me.  I think his mechanics need a little work, but I do believe he will play and play well (given the right situation) at the next level.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on December 24, 2011, 07:50:43 am
. … In the holiday spirit, Cutler presented his offensive linemen with watches. Caleb Hanie bought them high-end luggage.
Wonder does Hanie wish they would pack their bags? :-)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-1224-bits-bears-chicago--20111224,0,2348721.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on December 26, 2011, 06:38:59 pm
http://www.csnchicago.com/blog/bears-talk/post/There-shouldnt-be-any-doubt-Angelo-stays?blockID=619208&feedID=661

So reading this article it sounds like the Bears are going to be making some big free agent acquisitions.  That is good because Angelo can't draft worth a damn. 

I would say in free agency get a true #1 proven WR for Cutler.  A big fast guy who can catch the ball!  Rookie WR's usually take a few years to develop and the Bears do not have that kind of time.

I would also like a OT, CB and back up QB.

I have no problem with McCown coming back but they need someone else also.  They can't let a Cutler injury implode a season again.  I know no team has two starter quality QB's but you have to have a guy who can move the chains and not be a turn over machine so you can win a few games until your QB gets healthy.



 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on December 26, 2011, 07:02:38 pm
Perfect....2 more years of mediocrity.  2 more years of looking up at the Puke and Loins in the division.  Inexcusable to be 20+ million under the cap and with no depth.  **** this franchise! 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 27, 2011, 08:00:17 am
I'm callling BS on that whole Mullin article, especially the following statements in bold:

Angelo holds McCaskey in high regard, and McCaskey has quietly changed the culture within the Bears, with numerous examples of little things that have made impressions on Angelo and others top to bottom in the organization.
 
McCaskey has moved his office next to Angelo’s and takes an active “chairman” role without being a meddler. Where Michael once served as his own de facto GM, critiquing film on Mondays with Wannstedt, George does none of that but has made clear “mission statements” about the importance of winning, something that was given lip service in times past. No one is taking them as that now.


Really?  George is any different?  Really?  I haven't seen an iota's worth of "culture change", in fact things are more dysfunctional since Cutler went down than I've seen this team in years. 

Angelo may indeed be staying, but the rest of this article is an obvious puff piece / shill job for the new McCaskey and to be honest, reading it really p**ssed me off. It's a propoganda piece that insults the intelligence of Bears fans who have seen the past few weeks that this is a team going nowhere on or off the field and is much closer to collapsing into a 3-13 or 4-12 dung heap than returning to the playoffs. 

As for the "big moves" in FA... my money is on Braylon Edwards (Roy Williams 2.0) as our "#1" WR (as opposed to big money young studs like Vincent Jackson or Marques Colston)...  maybe a 2nd rate veteran OT who we will overpay (a la Omiyale), and probably a CB or S whose best days are behind him.  Our draft, I believe, will be heavily skewed towards the D even though playmakers on the offense are badly lacking and we don't know if Johnny Knox will ever wear a Bears uni again.  Martz will be fired (i.e., "not renewed"), but the Bears will replace him with a hack from the college ranks rather than opening up the checkbook for an OC who can legitimately counter today's top defenses.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 27, 2011, 08:08:41 am
http://www.csnchicago.com/blog/bears-talk/post/There-shouldnt-be-any-doubt-Angelo-stays?blockID=619208&feedID=661

So reading this article it sounds like the Bears are going to be making some big free agent acquisitions.  That is good because Angelo can't draft worth a damn. 

I would say in free agency get a true #1 proven WR for Cutler.  A big fast guy who can catch the ball!  Rookie WR's usually take a few years to develop and the Bears do not have that kind of time.

I would also like a OT, CB and back up QB.

I have no problem with McCown coming back but they need someone else also.  They can't let a Cutler injury implode a season again.  I know no team has two starter quality QB's but you have to have a guy who can move the chains and not be a turn over machine so you can win a few games until your QB gets healthy.



 

Well they have the cap space for all the pieces and all Bear fans know Angelo cant draft nor can Ruskell.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 27, 2011, 09:59:05 am
I have a really bad feeling this guy is gonna be a Bear in 2012...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/27/49ers-waive-braylon-edwards/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 27, 2011, 11:01:28 am
You've been saying that and I gotta hope you are wrong, but past experiences with Angelo going after former bust 1st round picks leads me to believe you could be right. Is Curtis Enis still waiting for a Bears call?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 27, 2011, 11:09:35 am
Braylon Edwards is the prototypical Angelo pickup.

A former high draft pick who has underperformed for most of his career, now coming off an injury plagued season where he could not even get on the field for a 49ers team desperate for playmakers at the WR position.  In other words, a "big name" guy who at 28 is well on the downside of his career and coming off an injury, ergo, has zero leverage at the bargaining table.

Character issues?  Yup, loads of em.  Bad hands?  You betcha.  Past his prime?  Definitely.  But hey, none of that kept us away from RoyBoy did it?

Angelo will sign Braylon on the cheap and try to sell him to Bears fans as an upgrade even though at this stage in his career he's no better than RoyBoy and Bears fans know it.  Hell I wouldn't be surprised if they put in a waiver claim on him this year yet; the only question in my mind is how badly we'll overpay for him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 27, 2011, 11:48:04 am
I heard one of the culture changes George has made at Hallas Hall is that now everyone needs to use a paper clip TWO times before tossing it in the garbage.  He has cut Bears paper clip expenses in half.  Now that is what you call REAL change.  ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 27, 2011, 01:25:31 pm
Hell I wouldn't be surprised if they put in a waiver claim on him this year yet; the only question in my mind is how badly we'll overpay for him.

That would not be a shock to me. I thought if they were going to go after him during the off season, why not put n a claim now
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 27, 2011, 02:40:07 pm
Good...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-put-cutler-forte-on-seasonending-ir-list-20111227,0,1558205.story

Preseason 2012 starts for the Bears now.

Bring up a couple kids from the practice squad, play a bunch of youngsters against the Vikings and see if we've got any young talent at all that's worth bringing back to camp next year.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 27, 2011, 03:37:27 pm
The Bears promoted defensive tackle Jordan Miller from the practice squad to the 53-man roster and signed guard Mansfield Wrotto to the active roster. Miller joined the Bears as an undrafted free agent out of Southern University and has spent the season on the practice squad. Wrotto was a fourth-round pick of the Seattle Seahawks in the 2007 draft.

Uh oh. Good grief. Another Ruskell pick
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on December 28, 2011, 06:44:51 am
Bears Pro-Bowlers:


LB Lance Briggs
RB Matt Forte
ST Corey Graham
CB Charles Tillman
LB Brian Urlacher
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 28, 2011, 08:01:21 am
No Julius Peppers?  Wow.

The late season collapse by the Bears (including a couple of really bad showings by our D) probably didn't help his case much but didn't he have double digit sacks this year?

Mind boggling to me that Tillman made it and Peppers didn't.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 28, 2011, 08:06:27 am
I imagine games like last week make a difference. Make shift O line, and our D (Peppers) can't even dirty his jersey a little bit?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 28, 2011, 08:09:09 am
Yeah, that and the fact that the 3 NFC DEs who did go all have a lot more sacks than Peppers and that's still the stat that matters most.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on December 28, 2011, 09:21:16 am
Pro bowl has always been a popularity contest- it also helps when your timing is good (great play at the middle of the season gets you noticed as well).

Its never been a real measure of a player's worth to his team.....

Now some meatball fans out in the Net will be saying just how brimming with talent this team is and the Jer is a good GM.....

That said, congrats to them and here's hoping that they play and play well in the probowl.......
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 28, 2011, 09:32:02 am
Now some meatball fans out in the Net will be saying just how brimming with talent this team is and the Jer is a good GM.....

I highly doubt any fans are that stupid but if they are I would simply point them to the New Orleans Saints, who not only have three Offensive Linemen alone on the Pro Bowl roster, but have both of their OGs STARTING in the Pro Bowl.  Now there's a team with serious talent.
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 28, 2011, 09:32:43 am
At first I was shocked about Peppers.  Then I started to think about it.  He does seem to disappear for stretches at a time.  Like the whole GB game.  Just saying.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 28, 2011, 09:49:27 am
You could argue that Peppers got snubbed because our D was too inconsistent down the stretch, but then how do you explain Urlacher, Briggs and Tillman still all getting voted in?

I really don't think Peppers has been 100% healthy for quite some time. In fact he may be considerably less than 100%.

It wouldn't surprise me a bit if he sees very little action on Sunday and then has some work done on his knees in the offseason.

Even if Peppers had been chosen for the Pro Bowl I highly doubt he would have played.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on December 28, 2011, 10:40:54 am
I said earlier in the season that Tillman deserved to be n the Pro-Bowl.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on December 28, 2011, 10:43:49 am
Urlacher made his 8th Pro Bowl appearance?  I bet Chris27 is ecstatic!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 28, 2011, 10:51:40 am
Everybody is getting long in the tooth on that side of the ball.  Peppers knees are shot for the year and need rest. The secondary....well.  The sight of a bear defender flailing madly and yet another packer wr trotting into the endzone says all that needs to be said. Just starting to recover from some sort of bug brought to us compliments of the father-in-law. spent xmas with him in the VA ER up in Nashville.  They left, started getting sick that night. Hell of a way to loose weight. This team is nothing but false fronts. past the starters nothing but naia players. I don't blame the players. If somebody gave me chance I'd go too.  In a supremely conservitive industry the Bears front office moves with the pace of a glacier. And now the same garbage about next year again. How many here would have stayed with Hanie after two games? How many in the Nfl? I'm over 60 and I've got better mechanics than that guy. This teams drafts people (knowingly!) who have injuries. Are undersize. Slow. Problematic. They don't perform due diligence. It's as though all those McCaskeys want to skip past the yucky stuff and get on with the business of stuffing more money in the bank.
To be under the cap (diliberate) and say its "ok" is a flatout lie.  Its not ok. Time to change. long past time to change. Starting with the owners.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on December 28, 2011, 11:05:15 am
Someone on another Website made what I thought was a very astute observation yesterday.

He said that the Bears late-season collapse on D shouldn't be any surprise given the age of most of our core defensive players...  i.e., on the other side of the 30.  And especially when they have had to play as many reps as have been required by our utterly inept offense since Cutler went down. 

If you buy into that theory (which I do), then you can say that four things at minimum need to happen for our D to be competitive next year and beyond:

1) We MUST get a legitimate 3rd DE in the rotation who we can plug-in for Peppers or Izzy a few series a game without the whole DL going to crap. This needs to be a guy who is at least as good as Idonije but ideally, better, and who gives us no drop-off in either pass or run defense.  Many of us hoped Wootton would be that guy but it doesn't look like that's gonna happen so add his name to the long list of Angelo busts and it's back to the well again. 

2) We MUST find a big, fast CB to complement Tillman at the #2 and eventually, replace him as the #1.  The big WRs that predominate in this league are eating our D-Backfield alive. Opposing QBs have simply been able to throw at will against guys like Jennings and Bowman so those guys need to give way to someone who is good enough to meet that challenge.

The challenge in addressing these first two points is that this year's draft class is not especially deep in either three-down DEs or big physical CBs. Drafting for need at one of these positions vs. Best Player Available may not be the way to go and if Angelo is making the pick you can be assured it will be the wrong guy.  At least one if not both of these positions may be where Angelo needs to open up the checkbook and try to pull some good FAs while reserving the top draft picks for offensive help.

3) We MUST rework/revise our defensive scheme to somehow reduce the physical demands on our older players while at the same time masking some of the deficiencies of our younger guys.  Okoye, DJ Moore, maybe Paea and possibly Conte look like players with a good future here... but the rest of the young guys have not shown much promise at all and LB in particular looks like a position that could get really bad, really fast once Urlacher and Briggs start to slip. 

4) We MUST become much more effective on offense, both in time of possession and scoring points.  The days of winning games with only 13 or 17 points are gone and are not coming back...  at least not with our current defensive scheme and players.  Victory in the NFL today is all about scoring points on demand and keeping the other team's hands off the ball.  This will require significant upgrades at the WR and OT positions, as well as a new OC with a system that is in step with the times a la the Packers, Saints, etc.   The big 3 bugaboos of the Martz offensive scheme -- INTs, terrible red zone performance and the inability to convert 3rd downs -- have cost us many games the last two seasons and must be remedied.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 28, 2011, 02:30:42 pm
Oh no, please say it aint so:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-roy-williams-wants-to-return-i-feel-like-i-made-play-20111228,0,1982063.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 28, 2011, 10:20:08 pm
We dont need guy who cant hang onto balls. But then again if all the rest of the WRs drop balls he isnt any worse than any other WR. Personally I hope he's gone.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 29, 2011, 06:21:13 am
Someone on another Website made what I thought was a very astute observation yesterday.

He said that the Bears late-season collapse on D shouldn't be any surprise given the age of most of our core defensive players...  i.e., on the other side of the 30.  And especially when they have had to play as many reps as have been required by our utterly inept offense since Cutler went down. 

If you buy into that theory (which I do), then you can say that four things at minimum need to happen for our D to be competitive next year and beyond:

1) We MUST get a legitimate 3rd DE in the rotation who we can plug-in for Peppers or Izzy a few series a game without the whole DL going to crap. This needs to be a guy who is at least as good as Idonije but ideally, better, and who gives us no drop-off in either pass or run defense.  Many of us hoped Wootton would be that guy but it doesn't look like that's gonna happen so add his name to the long list of Angelo busts and it's back to the well again. 

2) We MUST find a big, fast CB to complement Tillman at the #2 and eventually, replace him as the #1.  The big WRs that predominate in this league are eating our D-Backfield alive. Opposing QBs have simply been able to throw at will against guys like Jennings and Bowman so those guys need to give way to someone who is good enough to meet that challenge.

The challenge in addressing these first two points is that this year's draft class is not especially deep in either three-down DEs or big physical CBs. Drafting for need at one of these positions vs. Best Player Available may not be the way to go and if Angelo is making the pick you can be assured it will be the wrong guy.  At least one if not both of these positions may be where Angelo needs to open up the checkbook and try to pull some good FAs while reserving the top draft picks for offensive help.

3) We MUST rework/revise our defensive scheme to somehow reduce the physical demands on our older players while at the same time masking some of the deficiencies of our younger guys.  Okoye, DJ Moore, maybe Paea and possibly Conte look like players with a good future here... but the rest of the young guys have not shown much promise at all and LB in particular looks like a position that could get really bad, really fast once Urlacher and Briggs start to slip. 

4) We MUST become much more effective on offense, both in time of possession and scoring points.  The days of winning games with only 13 or 17 points are gone and are not coming back...  at least not with our current defensive scheme and players.  Victory in the NFL today is all about scoring points on demand and keeping the other team's hands off the ball.  This will require significant upgrades at the WR and OT positions, as well as a new OC with a system that is in step with the times a la the Packers, Saints, etc.   The big 3 bugaboos of the Martz offensive scheme -- INTs, terrible red zone performance and the inability to convert 3rd downs -- have cost us many games the last two seasons and must be remedied.

Yapper - Excellent post, though I think your last point is not as strong as we were scoring when Cutler was in the line-up.  I still will say that you are going to see a drop off after Rodgers, or Brees, Brady, etc go down.  In our case, we went from mid ceiling to "through the floor" with our back-up QB plan.  I think your first two points are spot on, and I think point 3 is a good one, but we have begger fish to fry before worrying about who replaces Urlacher and Briggs.  CB, DE, WR, another QB, and offensive line.

I think what happened to our defense was very well put by Pompei.  When we got to the 2nd half of the last two games, our depth was exposed.  The defense is nicked and I wouldn't be surprised if they lost their spirit watching the offense flounder for 4 weeks.  Consecutive demoralizing losses to KC and Denver took their toll as much emotionally as in the loss column.  Turn those to wins and we are looking at a meaningful game again on Sunday, and the prospect of Cutler and Forte returning to the line-up.  And maybe the defense keeps the last two games a lot closer than what we saw
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 29, 2011, 06:24:52 am
Speaking of Forte, where is the national outcry over his MCL injury similar to Cutler?  MJD can just rot down their in Jacksonville, seems awful quiet about someone else in his position...

I don't think Forte should play (exhibit 1 Adrian Peterson at 80% with high ankle sprain) total knee now blown up.  Just funny how the media who hated Cutler couldn't wait to pile on when he stood on the sideline...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 29, 2011, 11:20:01 am
Different scenario. Cutler went out during a championship game, seemingly for no reason. I was p!ssed myself. A lot of apologies took place after the injury was revealed. Last year, I liked Cutler. Now, I think he's fukking great!! One tough dude! I like his attitude, fukk the media, and the rest of the fans in the NFL. I don't care what they think about Cutler, I'm glad as he!! he's on our team..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 29, 2011, 11:31:45 am
I'd bring Roy Williams back, unless we can find a true replacement. He's big and strong and gets separation, his problem (as we all know) is hanging onto the ball.

Everyone is down on Barber, not me. Yep, one dumb m'fukker, but he can pound the ball. And I sure as he!! wouldn't let Bell get away. I don't think he could handle the load of being a feature back, but the kid sure has stepped in and done a great job. I give Bell credit, kid showed he could run the ball (with some quickness), block, and catch.

I've never been much on Lovie (or Angelo for that fact). But I think it makes little sense to cut everyone lose at this point. Give 'em this next season, better make it good, or it's adios..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on December 29, 2011, 12:15:37 pm
Who's the scat back wearing #25 last Sunday?  I'd like to see him stick on the roster next season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Fearless Freep on December 29, 2011, 04:18:46 pm
Armando Allen. rookie from Notre Dame:

2010 Stats (http://www.cfbstats.com/2010/player/513/1010443/rushing/split.html)

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 29, 2011, 05:31:14 pm
Was wondering who that was. He looked pretty darned good! We've got a very strong stable of RB's. Forte is pro bowl level, Barber is good when he uses his head, Bell has looked fantastic and now Allen? We've got to have some of the best RB depth in the league. We're set there for the foreseeable future. Now we need a viable backup for Cutler bad and much help at wideout. If we only had a doggoned GM with a brain,this wouldn't be so hard to make into a strong unit-ya know? I mean good golly Marie! Get us a top wideout in the draft, get one via FA, get a OL same way-draft and FA. Find a backup for Cut and crap...we're there,dude. But we all know who is running the show and he's a brainless twit! Nothing could be more frustrating than to see the needs,know how to plug them...and then watch the guy with the keys drive the whole frigging thing into the lake.... sucks royal....!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on December 30, 2011, 06:01:52 am
I'd bring Roy Williams back, unless we can find a true replacement. He's big and strong and gets separation, his problem (as we all know) is hanging onto the ball.

Everyone is down on Barber, not me. Yep, one dumb m'fukker, but he can pound the ball. And I sure as he!! wouldn't let Bell get away. I don't think he could handle the load of being a feature back, but the kid sure has stepped in and done a great job. I give Bell credit, kid showed he could run the ball (with some quickness), block, and catch.

I've never been much on Lovie (or Angelo for that fact). But I think it makes little sense to cut everyone lose at this point. Give 'em this next season, better make it good, or it's adios..

I'd bring back Williams at the league minimum, if we had no other better option this offseason.  I have a feeling like you the Bears will bring back everyone in the front office, and make a huge push in FA, so I rate Williams chances at about 20% to return.  I think he has a work ethic issue.  Coming to camp out of shape does not tell me he is someone who loves football, unlike Knox who came back in the best shape of his career to start. 

I'd also bring back Barber.  He made a couple of huge blunders, but I think over tyhe course of the season he fumbled once.  Just the worst possible time to fumble ever.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on December 30, 2011, 11:05:43 am
Williams can leave but Barber is okay with me.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 30, 2011, 11:40:03 am
If they cut Williams (which they very well may), I hope they bring in another big target (with better hands). I guess I'm hopeful a miracle would happen and he would start hanging onto the ball.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 30, 2011, 01:24:41 pm
"I'd bring Roy Williams back, unless we can find a true replacement. He's big and strong and gets separation, his problem (as we all know) is hanging onto the ball."

Being big and strong and getting separation doesnt mean squat if you DONT HANG ON TO THE BALL.  It just means an incompletion and loss of down.  I would much prefer small and weak and hangs on to the ball. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on December 30, 2011, 03:23:51 pm
I'd bring Roy Williams back NOT! If hell freezes over,sure....otherwise,be gone!!! Time for some talent at wideout,not retreads, not clods with bricks for hands,not kick returners....real,live,true NFL caliber wideouts.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: AZSteve on December 30, 2011, 03:36:13 pm
Well if the "Brain Trust" in the front office as well as Martz isn't sent packing I would not be surprised that  slugs like Williams will be back >:(
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on December 30, 2011, 05:42:24 pm
Hopefully Knox will be back? If not, then we're really thin at wr. Whoever comes in, will need to learn the Martz system, new QB. I still think bring 'em all back and let the chips fall where they may. D is getting old, I can't see us starting over this next season. Hopefully we can add some much needed help at WR, O line, backup QB, D backfield, some depth for the D line. This team was looking decent before Cutler went down, the obvious missing link was Hanie.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on December 30, 2011, 05:44:03 pm
Roy stays. Why? Cause Martz stays.  The system lads, the system. Gotta fit it, have to been in it.  Martz said so before taking off on his walk across lake Michigan.
Looking at some beachfront for his system temple north of new buffalo.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on December 30, 2011, 07:38:49 pm
I'd rather see Martz about 300 miles east of New Buffalo
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on December 30, 2011, 11:09:19 pm
Yeah Roy Williams knows the system, but he cant catch the ball.  What good is that, seriously?  I would take the rookie from 2 or 3 years ago that broke all of Jerry Rices records that knew how to catch the ball over Roy.  Just saying.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: panthermark on January 02, 2012, 01:51:49 pm
Such promise....only to end up 8-8.

Will Knox ever suit up again?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 02, 2012, 02:25:46 pm
They say prognosis is good but with an injury like that who knows if he sustains another hit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on January 02, 2012, 02:52:31 pm
http://www.chicagobears.com/news/NewsStory.asp?story_id=8535

Urlacher will not need surgery.  Whew!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 02, 2012, 04:48:09 pm
This part of the story is a bit unnerving though...

"Urlacher’s exam and diagnosis were done by team doctors Gordon Nuber and Michael Corcoran."

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 02, 2012, 05:50:25 pm
Second opinion for sure.  Call Cutler, #54, he'll hook you right up!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on January 02, 2012, 06:14:14 pm
Anyone else worried that training camp will start and Urlacher will have pain and swelling in his knee.  He will have it scoped to clean it up and miss all of trianing camp then the first game it still won't be right and he will have major surgery on it and be placed on IR.

Isn't that how the Bears doctors operate with all of our players?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on January 02, 2012, 07:17:31 pm
This part of the story is a bit unnerving though...

"Urlacher’s exam and diagnosis were done by team doctors Gordon Nuber and Michael Corcoran."



That's why I didn't bother to respond..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on January 02, 2012, 08:20:44 pm
I wonder if Stanford's offensive coordinator would be a good fit for us to replace Martz?

Anyone know anything about the guy?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 02, 2012, 08:43:58 pm
Yeah, Pep Hamilton, former Bears QB coach
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on January 02, 2012, 11:37:52 pm
After Flynn's performance for GB you'd think that their QB coach (Clements)  could get ANY offensive coordinator job in the league.  Why stay at GB and be a QB coach?

I waffle on Roy Williams.  Part of me likes his size and experience and would like to give him another year with Cutler.  The other part of me sees a receiver who constantly double clutches and doesn't make an effort to go get the ball.

Bears started Hester and Williams to open the season.  Even if Williams comes back neither of those 2 should be the starters.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 06:26:05 am
You're thinking exactly what I am, Dallas. How the hell does GB keep their coaching staff intact? I mean they won the SB and not one of em is gone? We sniff the SB and our staff is gone! Capers, no job offer. Who IS their offensive coach anyway? And how is he still there?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 08:37:24 am
Tom Clements, I believe, former ND QB years ago
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 09:30:19 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/03/angelo-out-in-chicago/

Happy New Year!

Now the big question is if his toady Ruskell will also get the boot.  If he inherits the job we're not much better off than before.  But at least it's a start.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 09:41:43 am
Oh happy day. PTL

The Bears sent out an internal email Tuesday morning announcing that Angelo, who had a contract through 2013, is no longer with the organization. The decision came two days after the Bears finished 8-8, the fourth time in five seasons the franchise has not reached the playoffs.

The club has yet to announce a move and until chairman of the board George McCaskey has been heard from, speculation will be that the removal of Angelo might just be the first in a series of moves. When business ended Monday, it appeared only the fate of offensive coordinator Mike Martz was in serious doubt. Now, everyone’s future is in question as a new general manager could bring with him a new coach.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-jerry-angelo-out-as-bears-gm-20120103,0,3365211.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 09:42:35 am
I think the Polians would do very nicely and the moving expenses from Indy would be minimal...   ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 09:43:00 am
Come on George be the man. Need to clean house. Its time
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 09:48:48 am
I would not be surprised at all if that Packers/Lions game on Sunday sealed the deal.

To have fallen that far behind not one, but two teams in our division...  especially on the offensive side of the ball...  is beyond excuse.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 03, 2012, 09:56:15 am
That simply shocked my socks off.  Astounding. Go George! Go!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 10:01:14 am
This is astounding. Like a miracle happening. We can only hope we get a real GM and he brings in a new coach. I know I will be glued to the radio and TV all day
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 10:04:44 am
Lets hope that George doesnt resort to past practice at Lake Forest and doesnt penny pinch. So Angie is gone but a penny pinching move would be to promote Ruskell. The whole band of thieves needs to go
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 10:06:09 am
I can't believe there haven't been like 200 posts on here about this already. This is (potentially) the biggest positive news for Bears fans in at least a decade.

The first thing our new GM needs to do is send Matt Forte a handwritten note of apology on behalf of his predecessor, then take him and his agent to dinner at the most expensive joint in town and get a long-term deal done.

The second thing he needs to do is call a meeting of all Chicago Bears scouting staff and tell them they have three positions to focus on for the next four months:  OL, WR and CB.  Make it very clear that continued failure to adequately staff these critical positions is simply not an option. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on January 03, 2012, 10:06:51 am
He also better not tie the new GMs hands by saying the new GM must keep Lovie. That should be up to the new GM to decide (and he will live or die with that decision)....

BTW I wonder if Jer was greated by the tune "Dixie" on his cell phone when he picked it up :D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 10:08:16 am
Lets hope that George doesnt resort to past practice at Lake Forest and doesnt penny pinch. So Angie is gone but a penny pinching move would be to promote Ruskell.

Exactly.  While I have seen nothing announced on the fate of Ruskell, that's the whole key.  If he is promoted to Angelo's position, that probably means Angelo is the extent of the housecleaning and all the coaches (except possibly Martz) are safe as well.

OTOH, if Ruskell is not promoted (or even moreso, fired as well)...  well, then, that would indicate all options are on the table up to and including HC.

If we are bringing in a GM from the outside then I really hope there is no "keep Lovie" condition.  That could keep away any number of highly qualified candidates.  If the new GM really believes Lovie is the best HC for this team going forward that's fine, I guess, but don't make that decision for him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 10:10:36 am
 HAPPY NEW YEAR TO US!!!!!!!!

Beside myself with joy, WOOOOOOOOT! BYE BYE JERRY!!!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 10:11:38 am
The Chicago media needs to get on this like white on rice.

The first thing we all want and need to know is if Ruskell is part of the picture moving forward or not.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 10:17:03 am
The Bears announced a 4 p.m. press conference and in it they said team president Ted Phillips fired Angelo, eliminating speculation whether or not he retired.

Boy I dont want to miss that
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 10:22:48 am
I can't see Ruskell staying. I would think if Ruskell was taking over it would have been an announcement that Angelo had retired rather than announce he was fired. Anything with the stench of Angelo on it must go.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 10:23:06 am
In that same release they said Lovie Smith would be retained as HC.

Translation = we're getting Ruskell or somebody else's sloppy seconds as our new GM cause no one top-tier will want to be forced into working with Lovie.

What really needs to happen is George goes up to Green Bay and hands Ted Thompson a blank check.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 10:25:41 am
Wasn't Polian friends with the McCaskeys? Dunno...could just be last nights Brats talkin' to me....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 10:26:35 am
What happened to the previous guy up in Green Bay? Whats he doing? He was pretty good too. Wolfe?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 10:28:29 am
I'm guessing that Lovie was "retained" because it will be the decision of the new GM on who the HC is. "Retained"is a relative term.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 03, 2012, 10:29:13 am
yeah, there's a "at this time" attached to that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 10:31:57 am
I'm guessing that Lovie was "retained" because it will be the decision of the new GM on who the HC is. "Retained"is a relative term.

You need to get on that Keys. No slip ups
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Dave23 on January 03, 2012, 10:32:22 am
Jeff Fisher will get a job in the next few weeks...might as well be for the Bears...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 10:36:29 am
Really doubt Fisher would want to come back to Chicago knowing first-hand how the McCaskeys roll.  And also with our best defensive players on their downsides and not a lot of talent in the pipeline behind them thanks to Angelo.

OTOH, he has gone on record saying he wants to come to a team with a good QB in place.  So far he's set up interviews with the Rams (where that may or may not be true) and the Dolphins (where it most certainly is not).
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 10:39:56 am
This is just GREAT news for this teams future. They'd be hard pressed to find a worse GM than what we had....let's hope they don't try :'(
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 10:41:19 am
I don't know...Fisher saw with Ditka how the city would embrace him if he wins. Chicago is still a Bears town. He would be King of the Hill.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 03, 2012, 10:44:26 am
I can see the gentleman thing to do after you fire the GM is leave everyone else alone and let the new GM make those decisions.
I don't think I want Ruskell.
I'll hold my thoughts on Lovie, Marinelli and Martz until I see who the other options are.

Is Bill Polian really any better than Angelo?
I mean who has he drafted...Manning was a slam dunk.
Freeney was a gamble, who else do they have, Reggie Wayne.
Anyone else? I think their receivers are better than ours but then again is that just Manning making them look good?
They only won 2 games this year.
If Josh McCown had started for us this season we would have won at least 3-4.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 10:45:57 am
On another not-so-good side note, Taub is interviewing for the Dolphins HC spot....
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0103-bears-bits--20120103,0,7474456.story (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/ct-spt-0103-bears-bits--20120103,0,7474456.story)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 10:47:33 am
Polian is an ace at identifying OL talent...  an area where Angelo quite possibly was one of the worst of all time.

Stiffs like Metcalf, OMG, Edwin Williams and J'Marcus Webb wouldn't have made the practice squad for the Colts.  Chris Williams would not have been drafted higher than the 2nd round by the Colts, if even drafted at all.

The Colts have not sent a lot of O-Linemen to the Pro Bowl but they have always had an OL with no weak links that makes very few errors and works extremely well together as a unit.  I can't remember the last time you could say that about the Bears OL.  A lot of Manning's HOF career can be attributed to outstanding protection he enjoyed most of his career.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on January 03, 2012, 10:52:09 am
I can't believe this!!!  Yes, Virginia, your team does have a pulse!!! 
 
I want a GM involved in building the New England/Pittsburgh/Green Bay/New Orleans systems.  Top-tier systems that can recognize and develop talent.  This team deserves nothing less than that. 
 
I don't know who that guy is, but I hope he has that kind of pedigree. 
 
 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 10:53:39 am
Time for the Bears to make headlines like the Cubs did with Theo.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 10:54:49 am
Agreed...it's time for some CHANGE and good change at that....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Eastcoastfan on January 03, 2012, 10:55:43 am
I am mildly surprised that the Bears have email.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 10:57:46 am
I want a GM involved in building the New England/Pittsburgh/Green Bay/New Orleans systems.  Top-tier systems that can recognize and develop talent.  This team deserves nothing less than that.

After all we are talking about one of the founding NFL franchises. This city deserves the best
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 10:58:24 am
I was just ranting last week about how the Bears are 20 years behind the times, not only in the front office but in the schemes and players that we've been seeing on the field.

Finally, it looks like somebody in authority at Halas Hall is seeing the same thing.  This is now a league where if you can't score 30 points a game on demand, you're not in contention.  And where trying to win with a dominant D is just p*ssing into the wind.  Our D is getting old and the Tampa 2 has been irrelevant for the last decade so this is the perfect time to re-invent the Bears as an offensively oriented team and start rebuilding around the true franchise QB we finally have in place. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 11:01:03 am
That depends on if they retain Ruskell. I wouldnt hold my breath till Ruskell is history too
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 11:01:25 am
I wonder if Papa Bear did a Christmas Carol thing and visited George to tell him to get his act together? Can you imagine the ghosts of Bears past present and future?  LOL
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 11:03:30 am
That depends on if they retain Ruskell. I wouldnt hold my breath till Ruskell is history too

I'm with you there 100%, as is anyone who has watched the Seahawks struggle to rebuild from the absolute disaster he left in Seattle.  OTOH, I believe Angelo brought in Ruskell so hopefully it will be a clean sweep.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 11:05:25 am
Can you imagine the ghosts of Bears past present and future?  LOL

Ditka, Bill George, Dan Hampton, Butkus, Doug Atkins...   yeah, those guys would definitely convince me!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 11:29:12 am
Si! Muy peligroso.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 11:30:56 am
Make sure ya'all vote today

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-poll-120103,0,2030712,post.poll
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 11:32:52 am
Oh and clean house is winning by a wide margin.  Remember you have to continue the Chicago legacy. Vote early and vote often ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 03, 2012, 11:43:43 am
I have a few dead relatives, I'll try voting for them as well :-)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 11:52:52 am
cool
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 12:00:44 pm
I think Yapper is onto something. Somebody else is singing the same line about Polian.

This was a move I never expected, a move I was told after urging the Bears chairman George McCaskey back in October to "find your football Theo,'' would not happen. This was the right move at the right time, necessary change for a front office that had become stagnant in the way it evaluated players and responded to crises on the roster and off the field. This was a move precipitated by failed drafts and clumsy management.

This was progress by a big-market team finally acting like one, and boy has it been a while since that was the prevailing opinion about something that happened at Halas Hall.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-haugh-bears-0103,0,1008249.column
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 12:02:18 pm
All I know is, if my name is J'Marcus Webb, Frank Omiyale, Brandon Merriwether, Anthony Adams, Marion Barber, Corey Wootton, Zack Bowman, Tim Jennings... or if I'm any WR not named Earl Bennett...  I am very nervous today.

Would also not be surprised to see the new GM entertain trade offers for Hester...  at least if the GM is hired from outside.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 12:10:20 pm
The only concern I have about bringing in the Polians is how the Colts collapsed when Manning went down.

It looks like the Colts had just as big of a blind spot about backup QB as the Bears did.  OTOH, if the plan all along was to tank the season to get Luck to replace Manning, well then the plan was executed to perfection.   

Also, it has been said that Lovie would be "comfortable" with the Polians.  I'm not sure a "comfortable" Lovie Smith is what this team needs at all.  Once the injuries to Cutler and Forte provided a built-in excuse for not making the playoffs, the entire team lost its focus and those games that dropped us from 7-3 to 7-8 were an epic embarrassment to Bear fans nationwide with offense, defense and STs all taking turns looking awful.  If they're not going to replace Lovie outright then the new GM has to at least put plenty of heat on him to produce in 2012.

Personally I think I'd rather steal the guy (McKenzie) from the Packers. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 03, 2012, 12:25:26 pm
This is all window dressing if the job goes to butt buddy. I'm in wait and see mode.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 12:35:49 pm
This is all window dressing if the job goes to butt buddy. I'm in wait and see mode.

Me too. If Ruskell isnt jettisoned too then the problem continues, only worse. I wont get too giddy till I see what happens next.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 12:38:51 pm
I see the Queens named former Bear Rick Spielman as their new GM
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 12:46:39 pm
Yeah, it will be interesting to see what the Vikings do with that #3 overall draft pick.

If the Rams take Blackmon at 2, Kalil will be the Vikings' guy and he will start Day One.  That guy they had at LT this year is terrible and just about got Ponder killed.

But if the Rams take Kalil, I'm not sure Blackmon to the Vikes is a shoe-in. WR being one of the few positions they're actually not terrible at.  If a team coveting Blackmon, RG3 or someone else at that #3 spot offered the Vikings a kings ransom, I think the Vikings would have to at least consider trading down because they are a lot more than just one player away from getting back into the mix. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 03, 2012, 01:02:53 pm
Jeff Fisher will get a job in the next few weeks...might as well be for the Bears...

I'd rather keep Lovie than hire Fisher.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 01:06:48 pm
I'm not sure Fisher is the guy for the Bears.

But I'm not sure Lovie is, anymore, either.

The whole team fell apart after Cutler went down.  Even our STs were screwing things up.  And while lack of talented depth is certainly a part of that equation there is also plenty of blame to lay on the coaching.  For example who decided to keep playing Hanie when it was very clear by midway through the KC game that he was totally out of his league?

And BTW when you're an NFL HC, your team makes the playoffs one time in 5 years and you lose 4 times in one calendar year to the same division rival...  it's time to step aside and see what somebody else can do. 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 01:07:07 pm
My God, anybody but Lovie. He needs to go
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: shasson on January 03, 2012, 01:17:00 pm
Martz resigns:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-mike-martz-out-as-bears-offensive-coordinator-20120103,0,4029196.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on January 03, 2012, 01:18:31 pm
Rollin... rollin... rollin...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 03, 2012, 01:18:38 pm
Philosophical differences?  With Lovie?   I don't buy it.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on January 03, 2012, 01:19:51 pm
With himself
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 01:29:06 pm
Somewhere, Jay Cutler is grinning from ear to ear.

Assuming Lovie stays on as HC, it will be very interesting to see this whole OC thing plays out.  Is Lovie gonna be allowed to pick another one of his cronies, is the new GM going to bring in someone from the outside, or will Tice inherit the job? 

It doesn't look like Norv Turner will be fired in San Diego after all so that takes one prime candidate out of contention.

The two biggest hindrances to this team's success (Angelo and Martz) have been removed.  At the bare minimum (and assuming Ruskell is not named GM), addition by subtraction has occurred.  This 4 o'clock presser in Chicago should be extremely interesting.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 03, 2012, 01:38:24 pm
Tice hasn't done a good job with our o-line so I don't want him calling plays on offense.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 01:41:54 pm
Do you think the suits in Halas Hall finally realized that maybe Cutler is a pretty damn good QB?

Do you think they finally get it that it might be in the team's best interests to put some talent around him and pair him with an OC he can mesh with?

Good god I hope so.  We've only wasted three years in the career of the best QB this town has ever had.  Can we finally put him in a position to succeed before all his best years are used up, please?

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 03, 2012, 01:43:48 pm
Jeremy Bates is being mentioned as OC since he and J-Cut had chemistry while in Denver.

Might be worth a look.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 01:48:14 pm
I would be 100% on board with Bates.  He turned down the Bears before we hired Martz though so unless the reasons for his initial rejection have changed (Angelo?), the outcome would probably be the same again.  And, Bates alone won't get it done...  recall that the year he and Cutler worked magic in Denver, they had a Top 5 OL along with a happy and extremely productive Brandon Marshall...  neither of which we are anywhere close to with the current Bears roster. 

Tribune article also floated Brian Billick's name.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on January 03, 2012, 01:49:57 pm
In 2004 he [Bates] was promoted to assistant quarterbacks coach for the Buccaneers, working closely with Head Coach Jon Gruden and Quarterbacks Coach John Shoop.


There ya go - bring in Gruden for HC and Bates for OC...

Pass on Mr. Shoop...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 01:52:46 pm
How about Bates for OC, and hire the Packers' QB coach away from Green Bay to do the same job here?  Seems as if Green Bay's backup QBs can play a little. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 03, 2012, 01:53:39 pm
This is all window dressing if the job goes to butt buddy. I'm in wait and see mode.

Agree totally.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 01:59:59 pm
Not sure I want Gruden here but in a silver lining mode at least MNF would become watchable again. He is awful on there.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 03, 2012, 02:07:25 pm
So the real question is who replaces Martz, and how long will the learning curve be on O?  Of course some solid talent infusion will help for sure.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 02:14:14 pm
So Martz resigned after his contract had expired?  Big of him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 02:32:54 pm
Tice hasn't done a good job with our o-line so I don't want him calling plays on offense.

WHAT?  With the pure crap he's had to work with? He's done remarkably well under the circumstances.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 03, 2012, 02:39:57 pm
Ding! I'm sure he's off on another across the water excursion for the temple of the system.  Pompous jerk. IIRC, nobody wanted to be OC under Lovie because Lovie was reeeeaaalll close to getting axed.  That, hasn't seemed to change.  Tough sell to anybody good at taking what the Bears have and making it go. Hell , anybody can say they are and OC, all they have to do is sell  one, maybe two people. Not so sure leaving the coach is a good idea for anybody.  Down here in TN they cleaned pretty good.  Fisher was pretty burned out, lost at least half the room, and the owner. I'd pass on him in any respect for the Bears. They gotta get away from the nepotisim and cronyism. Give who ever is the best qualified the job. If I never see another ex Buc or Ram coach/ player it'll be too soon.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 02:43:54 pm
You mean you don't want Rahim Morris?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 02:58:35 pm
You can ding Tice for playing J'Marcus Webb at LT but what were his options?

- Maybe he could have kept Webb at RT and started Carimi at LT but Carimi had his hands full just playing RT as a rookie, and then was lost for the year with injury so that wasn't an option.

- Frank Omiyale?  Umm, no.

- Chris Williams?  Then you've got a hole at LG which would have been filled by Edwin Williams -- who is terrible -- and then Williams got hurt too so that wasn't an option after that point anyway?

- Lance Louis?  Played OK at RT (with the exception of one terrible game), but totally unsuited at 6'3 to be a blindside protector.

- Levi Horn?

Give Tice a legitimate NFL LT (rookie or FA I don't much care as long as he can play). Switch Garza and Spencer back to their natural positions (G and C respectively). Get a healthy Carimi and Chris Williams back into the lineup and put them all in a more forgiving offensive scheme and we'll have the level of OL play we need.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 04:20:38 pm
Phillips at presser making it sound like Lovie is a lock to stay and the new GM is gonna have to live with that.

Not good.  Lovie's "respect factor" around the league is wildly overinflated by the homer media and this de facto "Lovie clause" will take some very good GM candidates out of contention.

As I expected and feared, this "shakeup" looks like it will be much more smoke than fire.  Look for Lovie to have full input into the OC selection process (and Cutler little or none), and another one of his cronies to be brought in as Martz replacement with a different (though similarly uncompetitive) scheme. 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 03, 2012, 04:33:10 pm
Did someone ask George about the field conditions at the stadium?   Just curious.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 04:35:02 pm
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/03/bears-ted-phillips-we-need-to-close-the-talent-gap-in-the-nfc-north/

Ummm.... duhrrr.... d'ya THINK?   ::)

The Packers BACKUP QB threw for 6 TDs on Sunday.  Stafford threw for 5 TDs and over 500 yards and Calvin Johnson had way over 200 yds of that himself.  86 points between those two teams and meanwhile our offense could only score 10 points against a 3-win team with our QB getting sacked 7 times in the process?

Yeah I think it's pretty clear the Bears are behind the curve everywhere on the roster (and on the sidelines)...  and WAYYYY behind on offense.  And anyone who thinks a fully healthy Bears team could have beat the Pack in the playoffs is smoking crack.  Nobody's D is stopping that Packers offense from here on out.

We need a GM, an OC and some OL and WR talent that can come in here and start putting a sh*tload of points on the board from Game 1 cause even if we still had a Top 10 D -- which we don't -- that's not gonna get it done anymore. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 03, 2012, 04:52:07 pm
Actually, a case could be made for the stupid field ruining the whole season. Knox slipped, int made, Cutler busted thumb.  I hope whoever is raking millions off the park district kickbacks is enjoying it.  Do they even live in Chicago? Illinois?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 04:57:10 pm
So if I interpret the presser correctly:

- Lovie is staying and the GM will have no say about that.

- Lovie (not the GM) will be picking Martz' replacement at OC.  Which probably means lots of running and 20 points a game (best case scenario) at a time when our D is getting old and the Packers, Lions and Saints can put up 40 on pretty much whoever they want.

I can't think of a single GM worth his salt who would sign on for that gig.  Looks like we're in for sloppy seconds (again), folks.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 05:18:46 pm
I'd be onboard for Billick at GM...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 05:22:42 pm
The speculation in the Trib was Billick as OC...  not GM.

Also, Todd Haley is floating around out there.  Past history with the Bears, etc., hasn't gotten even a sniff at another HC gig so might accept an OC job on the cheap. 

Personally I think he would be a disastrous hire.  In the first two games this season the Chiefs were outscored 89-10. Their offense was boring as hell and couldn't score points...  and that was even before Casell and Jamaal Charles went down.  Not to mention that he and Cutler would be oil and water.  But he has all the earmarks of a McCaskey / Phillips hire so I'm just saying, brace yourselves. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 05:58:53 pm
Lovie staying takes a bit of the luster off an otherwise great day. Angelo was responsible for the lack of talent and depth at critical positions as well as miserable drafting. Martz was responsible for the stupid play calling and 7 step drops that nearly got Cutler killed on a weekly basis. Those issues can now be fixed. What is not fixed is the poor clock management, foolish challenges and stupid timeouts. Those fall squarely on Lovie. He should be gone too but I'm still thrilled with what has gone down so far.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 06:01:51 pm
Yea but with Lovie for him it's got to be like having a hand grenade tossed at your feet......it blows up Angie and Martz jumped on it. Lovie is untouched but he's got to be shakin' in his boots so hopefully that'll give him AMPLE motivation for next season!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on January 03, 2012, 06:06:49 pm
He also better not tie the new GMs hands by saying the new GM must keep Lovie. That should be up to the new GM to decide (and he will live or die with that decision)....

BTW I wonder if Jer was greated by the tune "Dixie" on his cell phone when he picked it up :D

THAT... is funny!  ;D
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 03, 2012, 06:10:13 pm
Well at least the Bears are going to be in Nashville & Dallas for the regular season 2012.  Wish they were coming to St. Louis but it's all good.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 03, 2012, 06:30:12 pm
I heard him say this:

"Phillips said Ruskell would direct the Bears' scouting operations on an interim basis during the search for a new general manager."

Lets just hope the new GM is picked toot sweet, doesnt let Ruskell get his stench on this draft, and shows him the door.  Fingers crossed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BillSharp on January 03, 2012, 07:30:30 pm
I was listening to the radio after the Packers game & a NFL magazine writer was being interviewed. He said OLinemen are given ratings for pass protection & run blocking. None of the Bears OLinemen rate well as pass blockers & Webb & Louis rate the worst - both at the bottom of OTs in the NFL, with Louis even worse than Webb. After the 7 sacks the Vikes put on the Bears I'd hate to see the rakings.

He also said Edwin Williams wasn't as bad as we think he is.

I'm fine with moving Louis back to G & letting him battle with Spencer/Garza at RG & having Chris & Edwin Williams at LG.

We REALLY need to draft another OT - with Louis back at RG & Omygodawful cut we only have Carimi & Webb at OT. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on January 03, 2012, 07:37:10 pm
Wow, just saw the news. Hire a new GM and make him work with the old coach...LOL!! Oh Brother!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 10:25:02 pm
The precondition of having to work with Lovie will cause all quality GM candidates to opt out.

The only way this team was going to get dramaticallly better was with a change of culture (i.e., new HC), and that's not going to happen.  Essentially the new GM will report to Lovie instead of vice versa.

So maybe next year we go 9-7 instead of 8-8... and still miss the playoffs.  Oh well...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 10:38:47 pm
Phillips said that Lovie was the Bears coach in 2012 (when his contract runs out). After that the new GM can hire his own coach. At least thats what I got out of the news conference
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 10:43:25 pm
This team utterly collapsed after Cutler went down.

That is, IMO, 50% on the personnel chief (Angelo) and 50% on Lovie.  Really, it took 4 losses to realize Hanie couldn't play?  Really? Really? 

Which is enough for me to consider launching Lovie justified.

Unfortunately the bean counters in Halas Hall don't see it that way and because of that we will get a GM who wastes the 2012 draft overdrafting a bunch of Tampa 2 "scheme" defenders because of it. When what we really need is an OL to keep Cutler upright and WRs for him to throw to.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 10:57:40 pm
Hub Arkush nails it here. Good article and he's dead on....

http://beta.local.yahoo.com/news-arkush-nothing-surprising-angelo-dismissal?woeid=23795http://beta.local.yahoo.com/news-arkush-nothing-surprising-angelo-dismissal?woeid=2379574
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 03, 2012, 11:05:28 pm
Another good article about Polian. Would not mind one bit if he were the choice...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-haugh-bears-0103,0,1008249.column (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-haugh-bears-0103,0,1008249.column)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 11:07:11 pm
While Hub believes this was a George move at the presser both George and Sweatie Teddy both said this was a Ted Phillips move. I am not saying I agree but both said it that it was Phillips decision to fire Angelo and that he took it to George who OK'd it.  George said the whole family was in favor of the decision.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 11:11:04 pm
One of my concerns about hiring Polian is that he's damn near 70 years old.

The Bears have shown themselves to be at least 20 years behind the times in all matters of importance.  We need some younger, progressive thinking at Halas Hall.  Lovie is 50-ish but acts like 70 with his delusional thinking that his "Tampa 2" can stop "on-demand" offenses like the Packers, Patriots and Saints.  Martz was 60-ish but his scheme was at least 15 years out of date.  No audibles at the line? 7 step drops? Are you fu**king kidding me? 

Let's get someone in here already with their finger on the pulse of today's NFL.  "Old school" is one thing but hopelessly out of touch is quite another and I've seen more than enough of that the last few years.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 11:13:01 pm
They also said Lovie and the new GM would hire the new OC. And George said it would be Phillips who chooses the next GM and that he would lend assistance to Ted if needed. I got the impression from the presser that this is Teddy's team. Now thats scary
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 11:13:48 pm
I got the impression from the presser that this is Lovie's team.

Which is equally scary.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 11:18:27 pm
Lovie is going to have to win next year because if he doesnt he will be gone. They specifically said and repeated it several times that Lovie is only coach in 2012. After the end of the season the new GM can choose the new HC.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 11:20:34 pm
Right, but the fact that the new GM will still have to live with Lovie for the 2012 season will still cause some of the best GM candidates to turn the gig down.

Why would any self-respecting GM subject himself to the whims of a coach whose philosophies and values have been out of date for at least 10 years?  And whose team flat-out gave up on winnable games just cause their starting QB and RB went down with injuries?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 03, 2012, 11:25:38 pm
I understand that. They repeatedly said that the only restriction a new GM would have is that Lovie would be the coach in 2012. IMHO they are setting up for Lovie to fail
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 03, 2012, 11:29:55 pm
I get that, but unfortunately, by saddling the new GM with Lovie -- if even for a year -- we may be keeping a very good GM candidate from taking the gig.

The only way I see a decent GM candidate taking this gig is if 1) Lovie is stripped from all input in the 2012 draft process, and 2) Lovie has no input into the hiriing of the next OC.  As far as I can tell, Lovie will have much input into both so that reduces the appeal of the Bears GM position by many orders of magnitude.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 03, 2012, 11:38:11 pm
I get that, but unfortunately, by saddling the new GM with Lovie -- if even for a year -- we may be keeping a very good GM candidate from taking the gig.

The only way I see a decent GM candidate taking this gig is if 1) Lovie is stripped from all input in the 2012 draft process, and 2) Lovie has no input into the hiriing of the next OC.  As far as I can tell, Lovie will have much input into both so that reduces the appeal of the Bears GM position by many orders of magnitude.



GM positions are in a limited quantity. I can't see any good candidate turning down the job over only one year with Lovie. If Lovie was on an extended contract and he had to live with him over a long period then ok, but one year? No, I don't see that being a dealbreaker for any interested candidate.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on January 04, 2012, 05:03:17 am
Keeping Lovie on for one year is "dead man walking". They should sh!t can Lovie and start new..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on January 04, 2012, 05:05:19 am
This reminds me of when Angelo was hired, he was saddled with Jauron. Then Jauron won that next season so they were forced to give him a new contract, only to watch the team implode after that.. Makes very little sense..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on January 04, 2012, 06:16:54 am
Lots of Cowboy fans at work crying about poser Rob Ryan - while Wade Philips has the #1 Defense in Houston this season...

Lovie can groom his successor  - but if he brings in a better OC than Ron Turner or Mike Martz - he might not look so lost on the sidelines

Losing Toub will hurt though - make him Lovie's successor
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 04, 2012, 06:40:39 am
I expect that Lovie is the type of HC that would work well with a lot of GM's.
He isn't going to throw anyone under the bus.
He isn't going to rant and rave and be a distraction.
When we can keep the time of possession somewhat even our D does pretty well.
It is when the O can't stay on the field that the D gets whipped late in the game.

If I am the new GM and if I have any reservations about Lovie, I just draft to help the O as much as possible and see how things go this year. I think the only positions on our D that are much different than a lot of D's is we like bigger corners that maybe aren't as fast.
We usually like smaller/quicker DL but Peppers and Izzy break that mold.
Guys like Briggs and Urlacher could play on any team.
I think an ideal safety for our team would work for most teams as well.

If I were GM I would spend some FA $ and draft picks on O so we can score 40 pts a game.
If a defensive guy was at our spot that was ranked much higher than an O player, I would take him unless he was an undersized DL or cover 2 CB.
I would then see how this season plays out.
If Lovie is on the hot seat(as he should be), it is going to be hard to find a good OC to come in here unless he has HC aspirations.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 04, 2012, 06:49:38 am
Yea I don't see Lovie still being here a negative in the sense that we couldn't get a top notch GM because of it. The GM knows that more than likely at some point he'll be shopping for a new HC in his tenure anyway. It's just the way it is anymore. Very few HC's stay for very long. Heck he could come in and pick TWO HC's in his tenure...hopefully not but just saying...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 07:58:49 am
Keeping Lovie on for one year is "dead man walking". They should sh!t can Lovie and start new..

This reminds me of when Angelo was hired, he was saddled with Jauron. Then Jauron won that next season so they were forced to give him a new contract, only to watch the team implode after that.. Makes very little sense..


Couldn't agree more with all of this. It's that same old "leapfrog" sh*t going on between the GM, the HC and the OC that has been going on in this organization for years and has kept the team from making any real sustainable long-term progress.

All three of those guys need to be on the same page, and for as long as I've been watching the Bears, it never seems like they are.

Also, if the GM is forced to draft a bunch more Tampa 2 defensive players again this year because of Lovie, and then Lovie and Marinelli are launched next year anyway, we're just gonna be stuck with that many more players that are probably going to be ill suited for the next defensive scheme and which we won't be able to trade (or will have to dump at fire sale prices) because so few teams are rolling with that scheme anymore. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 08:08:25 am
If a defensive guy was at our spot that was ranked much higher than an O player, I would take him unless he was an undersized DL or cover 2 CB.

Keep an eye on Melvin Ingram from South Carolina in the 1st round.  He is a very undersized DE (6'2, 275) who nevertheless has a lot of natural pass rushing ability and has done well against top-notch (SEC) competition.

A third DE is no higher than 3rd on our list of needs (after LT and WR)... and it would grind my gears a bit to spend such a high draft pick on a spot player...  but if the new GM feels Ingram is the best value at 19 then he could very well be our pick and I'm sure he's a kid that Lovie and Marinelli would be completely on board with. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: rjzebra on January 04, 2012, 08:27:08 am
You guys are beating this thing to death.  It should be simple to solve.......and it is.  A first year business major would tell you the RIGHT SOLUTION is to fire everone from George on down and bring in a real football person.....NOW!
Ted Phillips can't manage a one car funeral.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 08:37:44 am
Well hey, at least we don't have those pesky playoffs to worry about so the boys at Halas Hall should be able to get right on finding that new GM and OC, right?   :-\

I suspect it will play out much like other Bears hirings...  we won't hear much for awhile except that a few big names were contacted and turned us down.  Then there will be another relatively long stretch of silence  (while George and Phillips scrounge the bargain bin), followed by announcements of the hirings of guys none of us have ever heard of before.

Norv Turner has survived for another year in San Diego so any of us who were hoping he'd be the new OC and bring Vincent Jackson with him can put that dream to rest.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 08:47:02 am
I expect that Lovie is the type of HC that would work well with a lot of GM's.
He isn't going to throw anyone under the bus.
He isn't going to rant and rave and be a distraction.


This may all be true...  however, there is nothing a good GM hates more than having good players (which he selected) underperforming on the field because of bad coaching.  Lovie and his assistants do not do well at putting their players in the best position to succeed and that's going to be a deterrent to at least some of the top-shelf GM candidates I would think.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 04, 2012, 09:10:16 am
Is it just me, or does anyone else think Ted has a really big head? I mean, BIG? Frickin huge.  Plus, I can tell you from bitter experence, any bean counter running a company that they didn't start will ALWAYS screw it up. Why? because everything is translated into financial short term impact.  They're accountants, they can't think any other way. Ted needs to quit or get fired and go to a swiss clinic to get his head shrunk.  A little bit. Remember, he was Mikey's boy, the man who can't even  arrange plants properly outside his office.  The man who got capped by ma.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on January 04, 2012, 09:11:25 am
When we can keep the time of possession somewhat even our D does pretty well.
It is when the O can't stay on the field that the D gets whipped late in the game.


Can't agree, I've seen too many O's march right down the field no matter what point in the game it is. I think basically, Cutler masked a lot of problems on both sides of the ball..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 09:30:03 am
The only time our D looks really good is when three things happen:

- We have a steady, consistent pass rush

- We're facing a young and/or inaccurate QB who makes several critical mistakes that we are able to capitalize on

- Our offense dominates (i.e., 2 to 1 or close to it) time of possession

Unfortunately there are only 2 or 3 games a year anymore where all three of those things happen, and they are happening less and less as OCs have picked up all the tricks to countering the Tampa 2 defense.  An accurate, veteran QB with decent protection can absolutely annihilate our D as we've seen Rogers, Brees, Stafford and Brady do over the past 2 years. 

Our D has also become increasingly ineffective over the years at stopping teams on 3rd down and especially 3rd and long. These are fundamental deficiencies in both scheme/coaching and talent, which if left unaddressed will cost us more and more games down the road until and unless we get our offense to the point where we can score 30-40 points a game on demand. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on January 04, 2012, 09:30:16 am
Why would you hamstring a new GM like this by demanding he keep a lame duck coach ? Typical Bears- one step forward and 2 steps back........

Fire Phillips NOW :D

At least the Bears are up-front with their incompetence (unlike, say San Diego :D).....

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 04, 2012, 09:50:52 am
I agree that the ideal situation would be let the new GM start with a clean skate but I don't think one year of Lovie is going to run off candidates. GM jobs are in short supply. I am warming to the idea of Polian but I know he is near 70 years old. Any good info on his son who would surely be a part of the package?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 04, 2012, 09:53:20 am
You guys are beating this thing to death.  It should be simple to solve.......and it is.  A first year business major would tell you the RIGHT SOLUTION is to fire everone from George on down and bring in a real football person.....NOW!
Ted Phillips can't manage a one car funeral.

Hey I've been saying to can the whole mess. But ya know its really tough to manage a one car funeral
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 10:19:29 am
Any good info on his son who would surely be a part of the package?

I haven't heard anything good about his son.  In fact a lot of Colts fans lay the blame for this season's collapse on him.  Supposedly he was in charge of ensuring depth for the Colts and as we saw this season, at that he failed spectacularly.

The more I think about bringing in the Polians, the less I like the idea.  And especially if it means we'd also be taking on the Colts OC, who was exposed as thoroughly incapable of fielding a competitive offense without Manning on the field.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 04, 2012, 10:33:06 am
I found this interesting out of the Trib talking about Lovie hiring a new OC:

The challenge for Smith is to make the right hire because if the Bears don't have success, he'll have trouble sticking around to make a fifth selection. Do the Bears believe he will get it right this time?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 04, 2012, 10:40:00 am
I don't know, when I look back at the past games, no one really scores a lot if we stay balanced and don't throw a lot of picks.
the first 5 games our Ol was atrocious, except for NO, our D kept us in those games.
Once the OL kind of solidified we won the next 5 games only once giving up over 20 pts.

Cutler and Forte go out and the rest is history.
Even in the last 5 games our D did well except against GB (who hangs 35 pts on everyone) where we threw 2 picks  and SEA where Hanie threw 4 picks.

If we get the O up to par, I expect our D will be fine, less damage to keep the same than to change it now.
We need some OL help and a #1 WR.
Let's sign Vincent Jackson in FA and an OL and draft one high as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 04, 2012, 11:17:07 am

 Go to the Trib Bear page, the photo of George is priceless.  I have to get back to work.  Honestly, I don't think a whole hell of a lot has changed.  Virginia still keeps people because she likes them, not because they're any good. super.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 04, 2012, 11:31:33 am
Polian has built super bowl teams. His son evidently has alot to learn but bring in both and put the elder in charge of drafting and we'll see significant change in one season....I'd be willing to bet on it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 11:41:43 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/04/reggie-mckenzie-expected-to-interview-with-raiders/

Why are we not going after this guy hammer and tongs?

Unless he has already make it known he doesn't want to work with Lovie.  But he'd be inheriting an incumbent HC in Oakland too.

I really think we need a younger, yet experienced guy in here vs. the Polian duo where Senior is out-of-touch old and Junior has a lot of on-the-job learning to do. 

A guy like McKenzie is probably worth a 3-win improvement his first season at the helm if everyone else will just get out of his way.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 04, 2012, 11:48:50 am
Polian has built super bowl teams.

How many did he build?  I only know of the one in 2007.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 04, 2012, 11:50:56 am
Another cog falls off the Packs machine....
Does the guy have any GM experience????
My thinking is we need help now, we cannot afford to let some underlying moving up take his time 'getting it'. We've got older players whose playing gap is closing quick so we need help now, not three years from now. Another reason to get a experienced GM in place soon....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 04, 2012, 11:54:05 am
Polian built the four time SB Bills team, the Colts who appeared twice, the Panthers who made it to the NFC Championship game the second season of his career with them. He's got a pretty doggone good resume...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 11:54:19 am
My thinking is we need help now, we cannot afford to let some underlying moving up take his time 'getting it'. We've got older players whose playing gap is closing quick so we need help now, not three years from now. Another reason to get a experienced GM in place soon....

That's what makes McKenzie so attractive, IMO.  He's got experience (and clearly has delivered results for the Packers), yet he's young enough that he knows the score and knows what kind of player it takes to compete in today's NFL...  something that Angelo and Lovie never really seemed to have a handle on.

Plus I mean, seriously...  to enrich the Bears at the expense of the Packers?  How much better could it get?  If Lovie wants to have any chance of beating the Pack next year he's gonna need inside information and McKenzie would have plenty of that.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 04, 2012, 11:57:17 am
Is he the GM of the Pack??? I thought Thompson controlled their player acquistions?? Isn't he the GM??
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 12:01:22 pm
According to Wikipedia, McKenzie's current title is Director of Football Operations.  So presumably he's the #2 to Thompson and a GM gig would be a step up the ladder for him.

He is 48 years old and has been with the Packers' front office since 1994. 

BTW in case anyone is confused (as I was before I Wiki'd him), this is NOT the Reggie McKenzie who played OG for the Bills during the O.J. era.  This Reggie McKenzie also played in the NFL but it was as a LB and his career was not nearly as long or illustrious as the other Reggie McKenzie.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 04, 2012, 12:11:27 pm
Whoever we get at GM, it has to be better than Angelo drafting and acquiring people.  Unless Ruskell gets the job, shudder...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 12:27:15 pm
If I'm reading between the lines correctly, Ruskell is out of the picture for the GM position.  Thank God.

In fact, the way I'm seeing things, he's basically being allowed to hang on to give oversight to the scouting dept. (not an encouraging thought) until the new GM comes in, at which time I expect he will be terminated as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 04, 2012, 12:48:45 pm
Thats the impression I got too, but thats contingent on the Bears presumption tha they can get the candidate they like to accept a job with a lame duck coach in Lovie. Now if they cant get that GM they might not have a choice but to give the job to Ruskell. Right now its too soon to say one way or the other.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 01:01:49 pm
I've been researching this McKenzie guy a little more and unfortunately I don't think we've got a snowball's chance at getting him.

He played LB for the Raiders for four seasons back in the 80s. He supposedly he wants the GM job out there very much, and it appears the feeling is mutual.  He would be going out of conference (vs. to a division rival), which would make things much more palatable on the Green Bay side. The Raiders have a wealth of quality young talent on both sides of the ball -- more than the Bears for sure -- so the new GM will simply need to do a few upgrades as opposed to a complete roster blow-up.  Etc. etc.

Ron Wolf (remember him?) is playing some sort of intermediary role to make it happen in Oakland as well.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 04, 2012, 01:20:57 pm
I don't want to wait until Green Bay's season is over to talk to anyone anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 01:38:35 pm
Hmmm...

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d825b106a/article/fisher-has-eyes-for-bears-but-rams-still-most-likely-spot
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 04, 2012, 01:42:55 pm
This is classic:

“Tim Ruskell has to go, too. When you talk about evaluations or opinions from people around the league, Tim Ruskell makes Jerry Angelo look like Vince Lombardi,” Arkush said. “He was brought here because he’s one of Jerry Angelo’s best friends. To me, it would be absolutely stunning if he survived it.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 04, 2012, 01:45:42 pm
That's why I liked what Hub had to say. I've had issues with the guy in the past being milktoast but in that piece he laid it out in truth...I like that....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 01:53:45 pm
All you have to know about Ruskell you can see by looking at the Seahawks.  From a SuperBowl team to drafting in the Top 3, in just a few short years. 

You literally have to try to wreck a team that badly, that fast.

Two full seasons since Ruskell was bounced and they're just now getting back to the point where they're competitive and they are still missing many pieces -- a QB, most of the OL, a playmaking WR and a D-Backfield, for starters. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 05:57:06 pm
Thoughts on this guy?

http://discussions.chicagotribune.com/20/chinews/chi-former-broncos-gm-sundquist-interests-bears-20120104/10

I'm not real up on how the Broncos were during his time there (even though they're the AFC late game practically every damn Sunday in my market).

I have some concerns that he is considered a better administrator than a talent evaluator.  On the other hand, if he recognizes that and is willing and able to hire a top-notch personnel guy to fill in that piece of his skill set...  maybe it could work.  And we could certainly use someone with administrative skills in Halas Hall. 

As I recall, those early to mid 2000 Broncos teams had pretty decent players (especially on offense), although the defense during Cutler's last season there was a complete disaster.

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 06:04:56 pm
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/04/report-vincent-jackson-unlikely-to-get-franchise-tag/

I fear that if this guy hits the open market, bidding will quickly get out of control.

OTOH, he's the kind of stud we haven't had at the WR position in... well...  forever.  He would be the best WR by miles that Cutler has played with since he and Brandon Marshall were lighting it up in Denver, and would immediately bring us up to parity against the big, physical DBs of the Packers and Lions. 

If we're not willing to open the checkbook for him then we had better be prepared to draft a big WR high because he is far and away the best WR likely to be available in FA this offseason. If we sign any other WR than him we're just wasting our time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 04, 2012, 06:41:08 pm
How tall is Vincent Jackson?  I keep thinking he is average size or below, ala Steve Smith, only really good. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 06:43:18 pm
Vincent Jackson is 6'5, 240 with 4.4 speed.  He's a freak.

You might be thinking of Deshaun Jackson, who's a midget.  Smaller than Knox.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 04, 2012, 06:50:52 pm
Vincent Jackson is 6'5, 240 with 4.4 speed.  He's a freak.

You might be thinking of Deshaun Jackson, who's a midget.  Smaller than Knox.


Yep, that is who I was thinking of.  Thanks.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 04, 2012, 07:15:26 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-exbears-wide-receiver-hurd-indicted-by-federal-grand-jury-20120104,0,848095.story

Another thing on our new GM's to-do list needs to be getting ahold of Hurd's client list.

We need to know if anyone else on our roster is mixed up in this sh*t.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 04, 2012, 07:18:21 pm
Have never heard that Vincent Jackson has 4.4 speed before. Really?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on January 04, 2012, 08:12:54 pm
He will be franchised if he doesn't get a new contract.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on January 04, 2012, 10:16:55 pm

I dunno, the article leads me to believe he will be let go.  Competition could be steep but there's no question he could help the Bears receiving corpses...I mean corps.   Other negative is he'll soon be 29.

Another FA to keep any eye on is Laurent Robinson.  I know, not another Dallas Cowboy.  He's not a #1 but he's a good #2 or #3.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Pekin on January 04, 2012, 10:23:59 pm
Years ago I read an article that showed over whelming evidence that WR's hit their mark at 28.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on January 04, 2012, 10:37:47 pm
Ok Dallas, for whatever Kevin Acee knows.    But then he also said it was %100 certain Norv Turner would be fired if the Chargers don't make the playoffs.

The GM doesn't like Jackson and doesn't want to pay him $13 Million.   but their offense is DOA without him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on January 04, 2012, 11:26:58 pm

Who really knows what the Chargers will do.  But if he does come available can you think of an NFL team that could use his talents more than Chicago?

We can only hope.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Sportster on January 05, 2012, 12:01:26 am
Reciever corpses,LOL
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: guest77 on January 05, 2012, 05:13:48 am
Not sold on VJax...he was maddeningly inconsistent all season.  Plus he was nicked up with injuries.  It is no surprise SD would let him go IMHO. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on January 05, 2012, 06:32:07 am
too much ego for baggage
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 08:32:48 am
I really don't think it makes sense to bring in a second tier FA like Laurent Robinson.  Bennett is rock solid.

What we need is a bona fide #1, and a 3 (unless the plan is to keep playing Hester at WR which at this point in his career is not a good idea, IMO).  Sanzenbacher is a nice feel-good story but I just didn't see enough out of him in the clutch to think he won't be on the bubble once the new GM and OC really start watching the film. 
 
The X factor in all of this of course is Johnny Knox.  If the new OC considers him (or a player like him) essential, then whether he can come back 100% or not could have a huge impact.  The guy out there whose game most resembles Johnny Knox -- and could also possibly be available in FA -- is DeShaun Jackson.  But I really don't want him at all. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on January 05, 2012, 08:47:07 am
I haven't really seen much for problems with Jackson.

He held out last year until the last few games.  he never did get a contract.
He didn't complain or trash the team in the media that I have seen.
he had 3-4 DUI's that put him on the outs with the GM.

There are games he doesn't get open, but that's probably true of any player.

I would have a hard time naming 5 WR's that are better.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 05, 2012, 08:52:22 am
I think I read VJackson had 3 out of the last 4 years with over 1000 yards.  And we had how many????
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 08:58:20 am
DeShaun Jackson is worthless over the middle and at 5'10 175 probably does not have a lot of years left in him.

What he does give you in spades, is return capability.  Which again, if Knox is done for good, we would need to replace.

I just don't have a lot of confidence in Lovie being able to keep some of these "questionable character" guys in line. Not to mention the McCaskeys are still stinging big-time from the whole Sam Hurd fiasco so I imagine character will be an even bigger thing than ever when we're checking out FAs going forward.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 09:15:58 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/05/cutler-was-in-favor-of-martzs-firing/

If Cutler's input had something to do with Martz not being kept on, then I would hope they will also solicit his input on who the next OC should be.

This is two OCs now that the Bears brass have forced on Cutler and neither have been a good fit... and we have wasted three years of his career because of it.  Your QB and OC simply have to be on the same page or nothing good gets done.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on January 05, 2012, 09:45:42 am
Martz didn't hold the position long in Detroit or SF either
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on January 05, 2012, 09:46:56 am
I really don't think it makes sense to bring in a second tier FA like Laurent Robinson.  Bennett is rock solid.

You mean like rock solid that he never misses a game?

Hurd is gone.  Knox is coming off a major injury.  Roy Williams most likely won't be back.  Hester is not a starter.  Sanzenbacher is small and slow - not a good combination of assets to play WR in the NFL.

And you thiink we don't have room for a 2nd tier receiver - one that scored 11 TDs last season?   

Shoot we have room for a couple guys like him as well as for a #1.   
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 05, 2012, 09:57:15 am
I really don't think it makes sense to bring in a second tier FA like Laurent Robinson.  Bennett is rock solid.
If we can't a #1 in FA, I'd likely stick with what we have, shore up the OL and see how the draft unfolds around WR.
I think Bennet, Hester and Knox can handle #2 and #3.

I doubt the next OC does many 4WR sets but I would imagine that having a VJ, Bennett, Hester and Knox on the field at the same time might be tough to defend. MIA will be rebuilding with a new HC, maybe you send a pick to them for Marshall or something.
When Jay had time this year he did well.
If we can shore up our OL, we'll be pretty good.
if we shore up the OL and get a #1 WR we could compete.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 10:09:42 am
If we can't a #1 in FA, I'd likely stick with what we have

Really?  Roy Williams?  Really?  This is a very deep draft class for big WRs with "enough" (not world class) speed.  Even if we wait till the 2nd round our odds are good at finding a kid that will immediately be the best WR among this sorry crew or at worst, 2nd to Bennett but bigger. 

Seriously, if Angelo were still in charge I was fully expecting to see our "big WR moves" in the offseason consist of replacing RoyBoy with Braylon Edwards, and maybe signing DeShaun Jackson.  But I would hope our new GM will set his sights significantly higher.

As for Hester, I think his days as a WR are over.  Or at least I hope they are.  The more reps he runs at WR, the worse he gets as a returner and that's not a tradeoff that works in our favor.

Bottom line, I expect to see significant churn in the Bears WR corps this offseason... at least as much as on OL if not even more.  NFL experts have been asking for 3 years why the Bears won't get Cutler some weapons and I think George M. is finally taking notice.  There's not just a talent issue per se but there is also a good possibility we will see a significantly different scheme under the new OC and frankly, a lot of the WRs we currently have may not be a good fit.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 10:36:26 am
Tribune article is reporting that Jerry Angelo is the reason Jeremy Bates turned down the Bears OC offer the first time.

I suspected as much at the time, and would not be surprised if he scared off other good OC candidates at the time as well.

So all those people saying that OCs were passing on the Bears because of Cutler can suck it.  Cutler was never the problem, it was Angelo all along. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on January 05, 2012, 11:17:57 am

Either from the draft or free agency or both we need at least 2 more likely 3 more NEW WRs in 2012.  Hurd is gone.  Roy Williams most likely will be and Sanzenbacher is iffy.  Hester should only be a 4th or 5th option.

Knox and Bennett are the only guys I have confidence in and Knox is questionable right now.

Next question - TE.  Some are saying with Martz gone that we need to find a receiving TE in the offseason.   What do you think?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 11:22:56 am
Alshon Jeffrey WR from South Carolina has declared for the draft.

6'4, 230, size and skills for days, has produced against NFL caliber DBs in the SEC...  but, needs to work on his technique and just generally grow up a bit (was ejected from his bowl game against Nebraska but not before getting 148 yards).  He will be the next WR taken after Blackmon and will not fall out of Top 10 unless he has a terrible combine and/or really botches his interviews.  If he winds up in Carolina w/Cam Newton... watch out.

Physically, he is the best WR prospect to come out since Calvin Johnson although Brandon Marshall may be a more appropriate comparison at least till he matures a bit. Bottom line, we've got no chance at him at 19, but he may push another quality player (an OT or maybe even Michael Floyd) down to us.

 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 05, 2012, 12:05:43 pm
And lets not forget Angelo wont be running the draft.  Dare I say it if someone REALLY good was there, we MIGHT trade up for them???  Just saying.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 12:10:07 pm
If we could package a player with a pick to trade up, I might be OK with that.  Depending on who the player is, of course.

OTOH if we're giving up multiple draft picks to move up a few slots...  I don't know.  We've got a lot of holes to fill as always, and if we hire a GM that actually knows his stuff I'd kind of like him to have the full complement of picks to work with.

The one benefit we do have is the additional 3rd round pick from the Panthers (for Greg Olsen), which is high in the round. That could turn out to be a very valuable bargaining chip, if not to move up in the 1st round, then possibly in the 2nd.

OTOH, if the new OC feels he needs a better receiving TE on the roster then that high 3rd round pick could very well be used on that player, in which case we've really gained nothing.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 05, 2012, 12:25:55 pm
And lets not forget Angelo wont be running the draft.  Dare I say it if someone REALLY good was there, we MIGHT trade up for them???  Just saying.

Trading UP in the draft???  Now we're talking!!!
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 05, 2012, 12:26:53 pm
I would sign DeShaun Jackson in a New York minute!  Especially if Knox has to retire due to his back injury.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 12:35:22 pm
DeShaun and Knox are very similar players, so in that respect signing him to replace would make sense.

The question though is whether the new GM and OC will consider a player with that skill set essential for the Bears going forward.

Now DeShaun is saying he would "accept" being tagged by the Eagles but I kind of think he's gone past the point of no return in Philly and the Eagles are going to let him walk. 

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on January 05, 2012, 12:36:20 pm
Didn't Angelo try a trade up last year...but he forgot to call the Ravens to, you know, actually trade up.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 12:38:23 pm
I'm glad that trade-up with the Ravens didn't happen.

It likely would have cost us our 3rd round pick, who turned out to be Conte, who actually looks like he could turn into a decent defender for us.

And we still wound up getting the guy we wanted anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 05, 2012, 12:38:48 pm
That's one of the reasons he's fired?

Personally it worked out because he got Carimi anyway.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 05, 2012, 12:39:22 pm
I think it was something about he called the Ravens to entertain a trade up (for Carimi) but didn't finalize with the league office.
Seems like the Ravens missed their turn or something and were ticked.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 05, 2012, 12:39:58 pm
I think Bates went to SEA because Carroll was there and I think they worked together at USC.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 05, 2012, 12:45:25 pm
The Jer was always a little light in the details area, - like making sure the boxes were checked, confirming agreements to make the transaction leagally binding, little stuff like that.  Stuff that gets you and me fired.  The jer would have to take a class and pass it to move up to what I call the "inept" range.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on January 05, 2012, 12:48:09 pm

Obviously Bears are better of not completing that trade up, but didn't he trade up to get Paea? 

Can anyone recall any other trade ups by Angelo in his decade here?  Trade downs - many.  Trade ups - nope.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 01:05:15 pm
I think Bates went to SEA because Carroll was there and I think they worked together at USC.

I would be interested to know why Bates only lasted one season in Seattle.

I do remember, two years ago, that game at Soldiers that we should have never lost to the Seahawks, but did.  That was Bates' year as Seattle's OC and his gameplan and playcalling against us that day were flawless.  Our D had no idea what was coming next.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 05, 2012, 02:02:00 pm
they fired Bates to hire Tom Cable.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6034016

Now Cable's focus is improving an offensive line that was a major problem for Bates to deal with all season.

Bates was let go after Seattle's offense finished the regular season ranked 28th in the league. The Seahawks finally displayed some offensive punch in their 41-36 playoff upset of New Orleans, but reverted to the same struggling unit last Sunday in their season-ending 35-24 loss at Chicago.

Bates was one of the coaches Carroll hand-picked to come along from Southern California and help in his return to the NFL. In 2008, Bates served as quarterbacks coach in Denver when Jay Cutler was a Pro Bowl selection and threw for more than 4,500 yards. Bates went to USC as Carroll's offensive coordinator for one season.

But Seattle's offense was a season-long struggle. It started in training camp when offensive line coach Alex Gibbs abruptly retired just days before the season opener. A lack of continuity was a common theme for Seattle's offensive line, which went through 10 different incarnations during the season.

It all led to a general inability to run, which was the biggest flaw. The Seahawks averaged just 89 yards per game rushing, 31st in the league, and barely avoided being the worst running team in franchise history. Bates was also criticized for some of his calls in the passing game, despite putting together an excellent game plan in the Seahawks' upset of New Orleans where quarterback Matt Hasselbeck threw for a playoff career-high four touchdowns.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 02:04:05 pm
Bates failed in Seattle because that team had very little talent, especially on the offensive side of the ball.  Which was the result of one Tim Ruskell.

Ironic, isn't it?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 02:29:01 pm
Apparently the Bears have requested permission to interview Ozzie Newsome's right-hand man in Baltimore for the GM gig.

After the whole draft thing last April that can't be awkward at all...   

Still there is no denying the talent the Ravens have assembled...  and of all the teams out that most fit Lovie's vision of what an NFL team should be, no team matches that template better than the Ravens.   

The problem is, the Ravens represent the old guard while the teams that are setting the standard for the next decade (Saints, Packers, Patriots etc.) are being built around the entire opposite philsophy.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 05, 2012, 02:56:10 pm
Thanks for correcting Ozzie Newsome's name.   :)

And that's the guy they should target and hope he comes here.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 05, 2012, 03:03:46 pm
You got the wrong great lake. Ozzie is a Brownie.  Tough to get him to move anywhere.  That Bronco guy doesn't look half bad.  Drafted Cutler.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 03:04:22 pm
To the extent De Costa was responsible for putting that D together, you have to say "hats off".

OTOH, the Ravens offense... not so much.  Ray Rice is really good and a couple of their O-Linemen aren't bad but otherwise...  blah.

Now, if De Costa could get our D up to the Ravens level and we could hire an OC to install a Packers / Saints style offense...  THEN we may have something.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 03:18:23 pm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-ask-permission-to-speak-to-ravens-decosta-20120105,0,7471342.story

Article says this guy has declined other offers before...  which means he's not desperate, which is a good thing.

I would have to think if he's that picky he would balk at the "keep Lovie" condition.  OTOH it is already a known fact that the new Bears GM will inherit Lovie so if he agrees to interview you'd have to assume he's OK with that.

The thing about the Ravens is that very very few of their draft picks are outright busts, especially the guys they take in the top 3 rounds where you absolutely can't afford to whiff. Even if some of their picks don't perform to expectations, they're still good enough to provide quality depth.  Which tells you that #1, the Ravens front office knows how to evaluate talent per se and #2), they're good at matching players with their system.

Ozzie Newsome has been one of the most competent and respected GMs in the league for many years (i.e., the anti-Angelo), so anyone who has grown up under his tutelage is that much ahead of the game as far as I'm concerned.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 03:46:01 pm
Ravens Draft picks, Top 3 by year for the last 5 years and their current status:

2011

1) Jimmy Smith, CB - 2nd string
2) Torrey Smith, WR - starter
3) Jah Reid, OT - 2nd string

2010

1) Sergio Kindle, DE - 2nd string
2) Terence Cody, NT - starter
3) Ed Dickson, TE - starter

2009

1) Micheal Oher, OT - starter
2) Paul Kruger, DE - 2nd string
3) Lardarius Webb, CB - starter

2008

1) Joe Flacco, QB - starter
2) Ray Rice, RB - starter
3) Tavares Gooden, LB - not on team

2007

1) Ben Grubbs, OG - starter
2) Yamon Figurs, WR/KR - not on team
3) Marshall Yanda, OG - starter

15 picks, 13 of which are still on the team and 9 of which are starters.  That about says it all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 05, 2012, 03:52:25 pm
yea, but can any of them jump out of a swimming pool?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 05, 2012, 04:01:23 pm
Keys... LOL.

A couple of things jump out at me when analyzing that Ravens list.

First, over the last 5 years  they have given virtually every position its due and they have addressed both sides of the ball. The offense isn't continually being short-changed in favor of the defense or vice versa.

Second, every second year (2007, 2009 and 2011) they spent at least one of their top 3 picks on an O-Lineman.  They don't go years at a time without drafting OL at all, nor do they relegate OL to the 6th and 7th rounds as we have done. They spend quality picks on players they expect to contribute early in their careers (as opposed to garbage picks on "projects"), and by and large that's exactly how it's worked out. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on January 05, 2012, 08:31:09 pm
Is he the GM of the Pack??? I thought Thompson controlled their player acquistions?? Isn't he the GM??

You are correct, Sportie.  Thompson was given carte blanche on hiring HC.  He stuck with Sherman for one year and, then, changed to McCarthy.  His second choice was the NO HC.  Not a bad eye for HC material.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 05, 2012, 08:36:32 pm
This is from Pompei and the Trib and points to the problem I aluded to earlier:

Considering the Bears are prioritizing hiring a general manager who can work with Smith and who understands his philosophy, Ruskell makes some sense. The perception is he was an extension of Angelo, but people who have worked with both will tell you Ruskell's management style is different.

Promoting Ruskell would enable the Bears to keep the general manager and head coach on the same timetable. If Phillips is dissatisfied after next season, he can start from scratch with both jobs and hire a general manager who can bring in his own head coach.


From what I gather from what Phillips said that talent evaluation and drafting of talent were what they lacked as well as vision, that means Ruskell wont be considered. However,I want to hammer home the point that it depends on the Bears finding what the are looking for outside the organization.

And another point, will the Ravens give the Bears permission to interview their guy? After the Angelo draft fiasco I sort of doubt that. I could see them granting the Rams permission but not the Bears, but we shall see how that plays out.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on January 05, 2012, 09:29:51 pm
Sometimes its in the contract the team has to allow the man to leave for a job promotion.

Ravens may have no choice.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 05, 2012, 10:19:20 pm
What I am saying is that the Bears need permission to interview the guy and while the Ravens might grant many teams permission to interview him they could deny the Bears.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 05, 2012, 10:25:01 pm
But the guy who fubared that is longer a bear. might help.  See where NE needs a new oc . Great.  Bears w' Lovie, or Pats with Bilicheck. Hmmmmm. Which would you choose?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on January 06, 2012, 07:41:24 am
Two points I have read online. 

One, this is a clear promotion which means the Ravens can not prevent him from interviewing.  The 2nd one is that if the Ravens grant permission to one team, they can not say no to another.

It is still being discussed today on WSCR, so I am not really sure what is going on  Some are making the first point and others have said the other, and these are well entrenched NFL followers, like Brad Biggs and Pompei who wrote this in the trib today;

"By league rules, the Ravens cannot deny the Bears permission to interview DeCosta because the Bears would be offering him a clear promotion with complete personnel control. But the Ravens can delay the Bears from talking with him because they are in the playoffs."

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Grizzlybear34 on January 06, 2012, 08:06:29 am
Go get DeCosta, and then what about Brian Billick for OC?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 08:34:45 am
Go get DeCosta, and then what about Brian Billick for OC?

Works for me.  The only thing is, Billick has been out of the league for a long time.  Longer in fact than Martz was before he joined us, IIRC.

I would be concerned that with Billick, we're just trading one outdated offensive philosophy for another.

Also I'm not sure how Billick feels about Cutler and that will be of paramount importance with any OC we consider.

As for GM...  well, the difference between De Costa and Ruskell is like the difference between Mila Kunis and Roseanne Barr.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 08:40:34 am
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/raiders-will-hire-reggie-mckenzie/

Scratch one GM candidate.

Can't blame him though.  Nice weather, easy division, a roster full of good and mostly young talent.  Pretty much everything the Bears can't offer.

A Trib article this morning also says the Bears are looking at John Dorsey, who has been in charge of drafting for the Packers for the last several years.  Based on his drafting track record and the fact that his loss would hurt a division rival, I think that would be a very sound hire if we can't get one of the bigger names...  or even if we can.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 10:00:32 am
I'm not usually one for making rash decisions, but the fact of the matter is that the best candidates for both GM and OC, will go fast.

Get De Costa in here for an interview ASAP.  Hook him up with the best of everything Chicago has to offer and don't let him leave before he signs a contract.

Once he's on board then get moving on an OC and get Forte signed to a long-term deal so that distraction is out of the way. We have a new offensive system to install and time's a-wasting. Every day we wait is one less day the players have to get their heads into the new offense... not to mention the sooner we know what system will be in place, the more efficiently our scouting staff can work on prepping for the draft. 

We've seen time and time again the Bears drag their azzes on candidates until they're left with the ones nobody else wants...  or unqualified people from in-house are promoted by default.  If George is really intent on doing things differently, the whole hiring process needs to be much more aggressive and pro-active this time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 06, 2012, 10:02:58 am
Dorsey does sound like a good choice, whoever is buying groceries for the Pack sounds like a good choice to me.
I think Billick likes his broadcasting gig, I know there is work involved but I expect it is like semi-retirement for a coach.

Honestly I can't imagine any GM/Coach not liking Cutler. I think it is clear McDaniels is a fruitcake.
He can run, make all the throws and usually makes good decisions.
In the past he has forced some throws but I think sometimes he feels like he has to win the game.
Even when he is getting pounded he gets back up and never throws anyone under the bus publicly.
He may have weird facial expressions and might give the OC/QB coach an ear full from time to time but I think that is expected.

As far as his agreeing with Martz leaving, I can see at least 5 reasons he was on board with this.
1. he was getting killed
2. he had to burn timeouts because the plays came in so late
3. he was getting killed
4. he couldn't audible out of a bad play call.
5. he was getting killed.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 06, 2012, 10:15:48 am
....and he was getting killed. LOL
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: BearHit on January 06, 2012, 10:18:06 am
Get De Costa in here for an interview ASAP.  Hook him up with the best of everything Chicago has to offer and don't let him leave before he signs a contract.

Once he's on board then get moving on an OC and get Forte signed to a long-term deal so that distraction is out of the way. We have a new offensive system to install and time's a-wasting. Every day we wait is one less day the players have to get their heads into the new offense... not to mention the sooner we know what system will be in place, the more efficiently our scouting staff can work on prepping for the draft. 



Why do I feel certain this type of urgency does not exist at Halas Hall?
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 10:19:33 am
George M. scored a huge payload of goodwill from the fans by firing Angelo.

By the end of the press conference that afternoon, fan optimism had greatly waned, primarily because of the news that Lovie's future would be off-limits to the new GM.  The HC affecting who is hired as GM?  That's just ass-backwards and yet, so typical of SOP at Halas Hall.

Now we're hearing that the Bears have "interest" in some candidates, yet not a single interview to my knowledge has been scheduled. If George wants to keep any optimism and buzz going he will have the hiring process of a fast track.  Bears fans are extremely smart and they know that the longer things drag out, the better the chance we will wind up with Ruskell as GM and Tice as the OC.  Which would pretty much squander all the capital the Angelo and Martz departures had brought George built up in terms of fan excitement. 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 10:32:04 am
Here's what I've put together about the interview protocol for NFL coaches and executives:

- A team must request (and be granted) permission from the candidate's current employer to interview the candidate.

- If the current employer grants permission to one team, they must grant permission to any other team(s) as well; i.e., the current team cannot attempt to influence the candidate's destination by granting interviews to some teams and not others.

Now what I don't know is, if the current employer can dictate the order in which teams interview.  Or if it's the candidate's decision, or if it's first come first serve.  In the case of De Costa, for example...  purportedly the Bears, Colts and Rams all want to talk to him.  But if the Ravens wanted to jack the Bears (as payback for last year's draft fiasco, for example), it may be possible that they could put the Bears last in line to interview which could potentially mean De Costa taking the gig with the Colts or the Rams before we even had the chance to make our pitch.

Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 10:34:22 am
Todd Haley sighting...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/haley-may-return-to-arizona/
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 06, 2012, 10:46:14 am
Well duh. Bout time. Good for him.  One less thing to worry about.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-source-bears-will-interview-tice-for-offensive-coordinator-job-20120106,0,5911250.story
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 06, 2012, 10:50:29 am
I would hope that DeCosta would talk to whomever he is most interested in first and what order he interviewed would be determined by him and not the Ravens.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on January 06, 2012, 10:56:51 am
Our O line has been horrible. So what do we do? Look to promote the O line coach. I would have a bit of a problem with that. I don't blame all of the problems on Tice, but fact is fact, the O line stunk and he was in charge of that mess..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 10:58:58 am
Interview? According to the Trib story, Tice already got the gig.

My bigger problem with Tice is that he's never been an OC before. 

Plus the fact that now we'll have to hire his replacement, and good OL coaches are hard to find.

Sure feels like a case of McCaskey and Phillips making the easiest choice as opposed to the best one.  OTOH, if the Bears fail again in 2012 then Lovie and Tice will both be canned and maybe that's the thinking behind it.

The other thing is...  shouldn't our new GM have been hired first, and then had input into the OC hiring?

Again we've done things ass-backwards and we probably just lost a few more potential good GM candidates by putting the cart before the horse.

For some reason this seems like a lot less of a good idea than it did a few weeks ago...
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: chifaninva on January 06, 2012, 11:08:16 am
Yep, looks like Tice is the OC. I'm sure that part of the problem is, who the hell is going to come in with a "dead man walking" as the head coach..
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 11:10:07 am
I guess that at minimum, making Tice the OC and knowing that both he and Lovie are tied to the same fate should ensure they're on the same page.

I hope Cutler is on-board with this or it's another wasted year coming up. 

At least now with Angelo out of the way we'll find out what Tice really thinks about some of the players on this offense.

I will be following our OL Coach search with great interest.  As I recall, we also canned our QB coach and while it would be a backward move, that might still be a place we could fit Jeremy Bates into the program.  Give him some sort of Assistant OC/ QB coach title and let him focus on the passing game where Tice might be a little underequipped.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 06, 2012, 11:15:54 am
At least you know who will be running the offense.....Jay Cutler. Thank goodness.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 11:20:47 am
So basically the new Bears GM will have no input into the coaching staff.  He will have authority in player matters only and honestly, he will be deferring to Lovie even on that.

In other words, the exact same position that guys like Dorsey and DeCosta already hold with their current teams.

Since the Bears GM position is at best a lateral move for all the best candidates, it looks like it could be Ruskell as GM after all.  He's the only one that would accept such a limited role and in fact he would be grateful for it.   Blecchh.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 11:35:29 am
PFT says De Costa is staying in Baltimore.

Given his very young age (40), the situation he's in there and the teams that were interested in him, I don't blame him.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 06, 2012, 11:37:16 am
yea, but can any of them jump out of a swimming pool?

Funniest thing I have read all day.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: dallasbear on January 06, 2012, 11:38:29 am
The Bears hired Angelo with a coaching staff already in place so a new GM would be given the same power to get rid of the coaches if he felt they weren't performing.

 As for the player matters I don't think Angelo deferred to Lovie on the draft or FA signings, though he may have accepted his input.  The new guy should have the same power.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 06, 2012, 11:43:04 am
Yep, looks like Tice is the OC. I'm sure that part of the problem is, who the hell is going to come in with a "dead man walking" as the head coach..

Man ain't that the truth.  Totally agree with this assessment.  Now we all know who's going to be the GM, don't we?

Yapper's fave RUSKELL!!! 
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 11:56:03 am
If this team has any sense (very debatable), they will hire Jeremy Bates before the week is out, and he will come in with the title of Assistant OC / QBs Coach with the responsibility of developing the passing half of the playbook and advising Tice in-game.  Under this scenario Cutler would be given unprecedented latitude to call / change plays at the line until and unless he shows he can't do it. 

And then they will open the checkbook and bring in the best OL coach money can buy so that Tice doesn't have to be keeping one eye on that unit all season.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 06, 2012, 12:09:28 pm
Too funny:

shorttracknews says:Jan 6, 2012 12:40 PM

As a Chicago fan I have to say the Bears are a bigger joke today then they were a month ago….if that’s even possible. When you get rid of a GM it’s time to clean house fully. They don’t bring back Martz yet keep Lovie knowing full well any new GM (any good GM at least) will want his own people in place. With what he had to work with, Tice has done a good job making changes the last 2 years with the O-Line after horrible starts (and losing a couple starters to injury this year) but OC??? Really??? All they need to do now is promote Tim Ruskell to GM and the Titanic is ready to set sail
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: WshflThinking on January 06, 2012, 12:19:29 pm
I cant believe DeCosta was the only candidate on their list for GM. Oh and Bates isnt coming in here to be assistant OC and work under Tice. I dont buy that. It sure wouldnt surprise me if Ruskell gets the GM job. Typical Bears incompetence.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 06, 2012, 12:26:07 pm
I wouldn't mind Bates as the QB coach. It mentions Tice as OC and they want a QB coach/passing game coordinator. It sounds like a good fit with a QB that he knows
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 06, 2012, 12:50:10 pm
Well at least with Tice we know we'll have an OC that's actually down there on the field mixing it up with the players, as opposed to that egghead Martz totally isolated from reality up there in his stupid booth. It also hopefully means the end of stupid silly gadget plays 5 yards away from the opponent's goal line.

Martz' aloof - and dare I say effeminate - persona translated over to our entire offense, with very bad results. It's very easy to see why a competitive, impulsive and instinctive guy like Cutler would not have meshed with Martz and I suspect Cutler has signed-on for this move being very grateful that Tice is much more aligned with his personality (and that he's not learning his third all-new system in 4 years).  I do expect to see some very interesting sideline conversations from time to time between Cutler and Tice but I also expect them to be more or less on the same page a lot more of the time.  I also expect the offense will play with much more focus and intensity knowing who they have to answer to on the sidelines if the screw up.

The OL coach hire now becomes critical so that we don't lose all the ground Tice has busted his azz to gain with that unit. I suspect Tice has already provided a short list of who he'd like to see brought in to interview.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Bears4Ever on January 06, 2012, 01:42:15 pm
That was the only way they'd get an OC who could be out after next year.

It still boggles that Bears ownership expects to find a good GM who wants to be hamstrung by someone else's HC and staff....

If this devolves like it probably will, it should be Phillips on the firing line next.....
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Keysbear on January 06, 2012, 01:46:53 pm
when...another 5 years?  The wheels move very slowly at Halas Hall
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 06, 2012, 01:47:15 pm
The only hope is that a GM will see he can get rid of everyone after next year.  And that that wont scare someone away from the gig.  But definitely not the ideal situation.  The Bears are cursed I tell ya.  ;)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: boogie on January 06, 2012, 01:48:40 pm
Phillips is doing the interviews and hiring right?  I can just see him waiting to book airfare way in the future to get the cheapest flights possible for candidates.  In the mean time, anyone who MIGHT be good will be gone.  Cant say I blame DeCosta for turning us down.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Phill23 on January 06, 2012, 02:41:39 pm
DeCosta  simply said he didn't want to leave the  Ravens and signed an extension.  Whomever tried to talk to him about leaving were obviously wasting their time.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: navigator on January 06, 2012, 04:00:25 pm
they just helped him get a raise :-)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: Jackiejokeman on January 06, 2012, 11:39:12 pm

 It's all out the door until we get a GM.

 Who's doing the shooting ... who's doing the SHOOTING??

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_NUMLTK-5w (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_NUMLTK-5w)
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: 46 on January 07, 2012, 08:26:49 am
Fantastic movie. Lost  oscar to "shakespere in love".  No politics in hollywood.  At all.   I really think Tice will be a good move.  He's good (I think, look @ what he had to work with), already there, and is alot more practical than the system guru.  Strikes me as the type if a guy does stuff that works that's not in the books. next week it'll be in the books, screw the systyem.  The upper management on the other hand, are once again displaying what's really wrong in Chicago.  Buffoons.  No interviews scheduled for the GM. More and more looking like its a ploy to play out before butt boy gets the job.
Virginia really needs to get some football people that know what the hell is going on. Even down here in Nasville the sports shows say and this is a quote " the Bears don't pay". Sound familiar?  Most the money is going right into the family coffers. They'll lowball a goof again, espcially now that they have to sped up to the cap or a portion thereof. Someone come up with a plan to get the team away from Chicago's version of Monte Python's flying circus.  I want to start rooting for some winning laundry.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: davebear on January 07, 2012, 11:37:19 am
It'setty early with some candidates on playoff teams
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: yapper on January 07, 2012, 02:24:18 pm
From Tribune article:

"As quarterbacks coach, Tice would prefer to add Dirk Koetter, the Jaguars' offensive coordinator and quarterbacks coach this season."

Hmmm...  that gives me some concern.  The Jaguars this season had one of the worst offenses I have ever seen.  And this guy was their QBs coach too?  I mean, look at Blaine Gabbart.  He was simply brutal.  If the Jags didn't have MJD there would have been games they didn't score a single point.

I think Cutler deserves better.  A lot better.  Bates is the guy if the Bears have any interest in maximizing Cutler's talents at all.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on January 07, 2012, 02:41:29 pm
Once again, I believe that the McCaskys are going at the hiring of a GM ass-end to.
Title: Re: 2011 Chicago Bears
Post by: packrat on January 07, 2012, 02:45:50 pm
Wolf knew that he wanted Sherman to remain as HC when Wolf was gone.  Wolf knew that in order to hire a good GM he would have to give him full authority on hiring a new HC.  In order to resolve that he made Sherman GM/HC  - an equally  egregious error.

You can't hire a good GM and tell him who his coaching staff will be.