Bleacher Bums Forum

General Category => Archives => Topic started by: Dave23 on February 16, 2011, 11:53:06 am


Title: On the Farm 2/16/11 - 5/9/13
Post by: Dave23 on February 16, 2011, 11:53:06 am
Discuss the future stars of the Chicago Cubs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 17, 2011, 08:59:37 am
International signings list:

http://www.northsidebaseball.com/~nsbb/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=61285&view=previous (http://www.northsidebaseball.com/%7Ensbb/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=61285&view=previous)
Title: Darvill, Geiger Give Cubs More Options At Third
Post by: JR on February 18, 2011, 10:29:19 am
CHICAGO—After getting spoiled by 14 seasons of Ron Santo and replacing him with Bill Madlock, who won two batting titles in three years, the Cubs endured a long drought at third base. They went through 17 regulars at the hot corner in the next 26 seasons, and watched hyped prospects such as Tony Woods, Gary Scott, Pedro Castellano, Kevin Orie and David Kelton fall by the wayside.

Chicago solved the problem by liberating Aramis Ramirez from the Pirates in July 2003. Ramirez has hit 213 homers with the Cubs and is still their starting third baseman eight years later.

Whenever Ramirez departs, Chicago will have no shortage of internal options to replace him. They include Marquez Smith, Josh Vitters and D.J. LeMahieu. Beyond those players are two sleepers who have yet to reach full-season ball: Wes Darvill and Dustin Geiger.

Darvill has hit just .225/.314/.241 in two pro seasons, but his numbers belie his potential. He didn't turn 19 until after the 2010 season and he has yet to full out his 6-foot-3, 175-pound frame.

Cubs scouting director Tim Wilken said Darvill reminded him of a raw version of Reid Brignac when Darvill signed for $142,200 as a fifth-round pick out of a Canadian secondary school in 2009. He has plenty of bat speed and controls the strike zone, so he should hit for power and average once he adds strength, which he began doing in Chicago's offseason conditioning program. He also has the athleticism and arm strength to be an above-average defender at third base.

"He won't come quickly. He's four years away," Wilken said. "But wait until you see what he can become."

The Cubs drafted Geiger in the 24th round out of a Florida high school last June, signing him away from a Central Florida scholarship for $150,000. He spent his pro debut in Rookie-level Arizona League, where he batted .244/.312/.358. He's already 6-foot-2 and 190 pounds, and Wilken envisions him adding another 25 pounds of muscle.

"He's going to be very big and he'll carry the weight easy," Wilken said. "He plays a very good third base and we really like the bat quite a bit. He's a confident kid."
Cubbyhole

• Righthander Jeff Samardzija has yet to justify the Cubs' $10 million decision to buy him away from the NFL in 2007,  but because he's out of options, he'll likely make the Opening Day roster. He'll get a chance to compete for a spot at the back of the Cubs' rotation, but he's a more likely fit in the bullpen.

• The Cubs own a top-10 pick for just the third time in the last 10 drafts, choosing ninth. Chicago drafted outfielder Ryan Harvey sixth overall in 2003, and he's now trying to make it as a pitcher after signing with the Red Sox as a minor league free agent in December.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 02, 2011, 04:11:22 pm
Chicago Cubs

Top signing: RHP Jin-Young Kim, South Korea, $850,000

July 2 eligible six-figure signings: SS Carlos Penalver (Venezuela), 3B Jeimer Candelario (Dominican Republic), OF Jeffrey Baez (Venezuela), SS Francisco Sanchez (Dominican Republic), LHP Angel Mejias (Venezuela), C Alberto Mineo (Italy), RHP Alexander Santana (Dominican Republic), SS Antonio Gonzalez (Dominican Republic) Other six-figure signings: RHP Gilberto Abreu (Dominican Republic)

While some teams are still trying to figure out how to build a presence in the Dominican Republic, the Cubs have been aggressive in the Pacific Rim while continuing to grow their presence in Latin America. The club's ownership has been active traveling to Latin America, adding international staff last year and working on plans to build a new Dominican academy.

The Cubs long have been leaders in South Korea, dating back to signing first baseman Hee Seop Choi for $1.2 million in 1999. Their top more recent signees have been shortstop Hak-Ju Lee ( $725,000 in 2008) and righthander Dae-Eun Rhee ($525,000, 2007). They went back to South Korea to make their top international signing of 2010, signing righthander Jin-Young Kim last February for $850,000, the largest Pacific Rim amateur bonus of 2010. After signing, Kim completed his senior year at Duck Soo High, then went to Australia to work out with Cubs staff over the summer before coming to Arizona in the fall for instructional league.

Kim, 18, is 6-foot, 185 pounds and stands out with his feel for pitching and control of a solid four-pitch mix. Kim's arm works well and he has good body control, which enables him to repeat his mechanics and throw strikes well for his age. He commands his fastball well to both sides of the plate, sitting at 87-89 mph with some sink and touching 91. He throws two breaking balls, a curveball with late downer action and a solid slider that he made strides with last year. He also shows advanced feel for a changeup. Kim will likely begin his career in the Rookie-level Arizona League or the short-season Northwest League, though he's advanced enough that he could reach low Class A Peoria by the end of the season.

In Latin America, the Cubs' top signing was Carlos Penalver, a Venezuelan shortstop from Maracay who signed for $550,000. A 16-year-old righthanded hitter, Penalver has an athletic 6-foot, 170-pound frame with good hands, body control and footwork. He's an above-average runner with good instincts and should stick at shortstop. Penalver's medium frame doesn't project for power, but he has good bat speed and the ability to control the barrel with a line-drive stroke.

In October the Cubs added third baseman Jeimer Candelario for $500,000. Candelario, 17, was born in the United States but moved to the Dominican Republic. A thickly-built 6-foot, 185 pounds, Candelario is a switch-hitter who stands out with his potential to hit for average and power. Candelario has some movement in his setup but he generates power with good present strength—particularly in his hands—bat speed and advanced feel at the plate. Candelario is a below-average runner and his defense is behind his bat, but he does have a strong arm at third.

Former Yankees international scouting director Carlos Rios trained both third baseman Gabriel Cenas (who signed for $700,000 with the Blue Jays) and Jeffrey Baez, whose $350,000 from the Cubs was the second-most last year for a Venezuelan outfielder. Baez, 17, is a 6-foot, 170-pound righthanded hitter with athleticism, speed and a long-levered, projectable body. He's a plus-plus runner who could slow down as he fills out, but he has the present speed to play center field, good body control and an average arm. Baez's bat is still coming along but he has projectable power.

The Cubs also signed Francisco Sanchez (previously reported as Daniel, his middle name) for $350,000 on July 2. A 17-year-old Dominican shortstop, Sanchez is a 6-foot-2, 170-pound righthanded hitter with a high-waisted frame and offensive upside. Sanchez has strong hands and an easy, loose swing with power. A fringe-average runner, Sanchez might have to move off shortstop but has the above-average arm to handle a move to third.

Venezuelan lefthander Angel Mejias, a slender 6-foot-3, 180 pounds, signed with the Cubs in November. Mejias, 17, has shown poise on the mound evident from his experience representing Venezuelan youth national teams, including when he was teammates with Athletics third baseman Renato Nunez and Rangers shortstop Rougned Odor at the World Youth Championship in Taiwan in 2009. Mejias was also Venezuela's youngest player at the 18U Junior World Championship in July in Thunder Bay, Canada, where he gave up nine runs (three earned) in 9 1/3 innings with 11 strikeouts and eight walks in appearances against Taiwan and Italy. Mejias has good arm speed and sits in the mid-to-high 80s with some sink to his fastball, topping out at 90 mph. He's shown some feel for an inconsistent curveball with good bite and rotation, though he's had mixed results in the international tournaments in which he's participated.

Alexander Santana, a 17-year-old Dominican righthander, signed with the Cubs in September. At 6-foot-2, 180 pounds, Santana has a large, projectable frame. His arm works well and he gets good extension out front on his 87-91 mph fastball with above-average sink and a good curveball for his age.

Dominican shortstop Antonio Gonzalez, a 5-foot-10, 165-pound switch-hitter, signed with the Cubs in December. Gonzalez doesn't have flashy tools but he has good baseball instincts and is solid in the field. He has good hands, quick feet and should stick at either shortstop or second base. Gonzalez will never be a power hitter but he has a decent bat and a contact-oriented stroke.

Europe's top prospect last year was Alberto Mineo, a 16-year-old Italian catcher who signed with the Cubs in August for $225,000. Cubs scout Bill Holmberg is the pitching coach of the Italian national team and runs the European Academy in Italy where Mineo trained. Mineo played for the Italian team at the 18U Junior World Championship in Thunder Bay, Canada in July, though he finished the tournament 2-for-20 with four walks and nine strikeouts. A lefthanded hitter, Mineo is 5-foot-11, 165 pounds and stands out for his catch-and-throw skills. His strong hands and forearms help his receiving and he has good defensive instincts. Mineo doesn't project as a power hitter and he's still ironing out his mechanics at the plate, but he has the makings of solid, flat swing. Mineo enrolled in an accelerated high school program and is expected to stay in Italy to work out at the European Academy before coming to the United States, likely in 2012.

Prior to July 2, the Cubs signed 6-foot-2, 180-pound righthander Gilberto Abreu out of the Dominican Republic in March. At 17, Abreu has good arm action and an 87-91 mph fastball that could be a plus pitch once he fills out his projectable body. He's still learning to throw strikes, though, after recording twice as many walks (28) as strikeouts (14) in 27 innings last year in the Dominican Summer League.

The Cubs closed the book on a busy international year in December when they signed a pair of Cuban defectors: outfielder Rubi Silva ($1 million) and catcher Yaniel Cabeza ($500,000). Silva, a 21-year-old righthanded hitter, has the above-average speed to play center field, enough arm to handle right field and the versatility to possibly handle a conversion to second base, which wasn't happening for him on a Cuban junior national team with Jose Iglesias and Adeiny Hechavarria manning the middle infield. Silva, who hit .276/.305/.428 in 283 at-bats for La Habana in Cuba's Serie Nacional in 2008-09, is an aggressive hitter with a line-drive swing and gap power. Cabeza, 21, draws widespread praise from scouts for his defense. He's a very good catch-and-throw guy with athleticism behind the plate and a plus arm. Scouts have also praised his game-calling skills and take-charge leadership style. Cabeza hit .195 in 82 at-bats in 2008-09 for La Habana and his bat will have to catch up to his defense. He's an aggressive hitter but he shows solid bat control and situational hitting acumen.

Silva and Cabeza gave the Cubs three Cuban signings in 2010, as the Cubs had signed righthander Juan Serrano in March for $250,000. Serrano, who turns 22 on March 3, had a 5.48 ERA in 64 innings in the Northwest League last summer, showing good control of fringy stuff. At 5-foot-10, 220 pounds, Serrano sits in the high-80s with solid movement and touches 91, mixing in a curve and a changeup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 17, 2011, 02:39:30 pm
This guy made Baseball America's list of Top 20 Dominican and Venezuelean Summer League prospects.

Gioskar Amaya, ss, Cubs
 
Age: 18. B-T: R-R. Ht.: 5-11. Wt.: 175. Signed: Dominican Republic, 2009. 

The Cubs field two teams in the DSL, and one of them finished with the league's best record last year. The Cubs brought a handful of promising young players from their DSL club to instructional league last fall, including Willson Contreras, an offensive-oriented third baseman, and righthanders Starlin Peralta and Amaury Paulino, both of whom can hit 93 mph. The Cubs had a talented middle infield in the DSL with Amaya and Marco Hernandez splitting time at shortstop at second base. While Hernandez has an athletic frame and good bat speed, Amaya also has good tools and more advanced feel for the game. Amaya is a good hitter who can take his stroke to game situations because he controls the strike zone well. He has a strong lower half, makes a lot of contact and creates some loft in his swing with gap power. Amaya isn't a premium quick-twitch athlete, but he runs well and has a high baseball IQ, showing good hands, solid feet and a solid arm in the field
.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 19, 2011, 08:34:55 am
craig - Mar 17, 2011 2:31 pm (#2530 of 2557) Reply

For my own sake, in case I want to re-find these later...

Reb66 - Mar 16, 2011 10:18 am (#1347 of 1352) FWIW and to the extent that Bruce Levine accurately passes on what the Cubs brass tells him, Levine said in a chat early in spring training that "CJ Lemahieu is someone they feel wil be a major league 2b in the next few years."

craig - Mar 16, 2011 10:20 am (#1348 of 1352) Thanks, reb. That's pretty good, and encouraging.

Dave, I'm not sure how much I've assumed versus what I've actually gotten from comments. And how much of my assumption is based on iffy info. If the Cubs think he can stick, they've got a LOT more invested and depending on him that anybody else, and they are likely to have watched and thought about it a lot more than AZ Phil or some scout who BA talked to who'd only watched him for a couple of games and had no reason to watch him with particular interest.

But I know that Az Phil has a couple of times mentioned that Lem doesn't look very good at 2B, especially on the pivot. Phil thought he'd need to move to 3rd and looked better there.

I thought that at Daytona DJ didn't play 3rd early because Vitters was there, but that a lot of his 3B play came after the Vitters promotion.

Here's a BA quote from January:

"

Jake (MD): What did scouts have to say about LeMahieu's season? 

Jim Callis: Mixed reports. Everyone agrees that he can hit, and he's the best pure hitter in the system. But while ***the Cubs think he has a chance to play second base*** and make some adjustments to hit 15 homers per year, ***scouts outside the organization don't think he has the quickness to play second*** or the power for third."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 30, 2011, 03:48:31 pm
http://www.northsidebaseball.com/~nsbb/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=61285&view=previous (http://www.northsidebaseball.com/%7Ensbb/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=61285&view=previous)

Cubs 2009 Asian Signings


Korea:

Na Kyung-min (OF): $725,000

****-Yeop Kim (OF): $550,000

Kim Jin-Yeong (RHP): $1.2 million



Taiwan:

Yao-Lin Wang: (RHP): $260,000

Chen Pin-chie: (2B): $300,000

Wang Tsu-an: (RHP): $300,000+

2011 International Signings
 
Mark Malave, C  ($1M+)
 
Ricardo Marcano, 3B
 
Enrique Acosta, SS ($1M+)

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on March 30, 2011, 07:14:08 pm
censored-Yeop Kim (OF): $550,000

What the censored is that?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 30, 2011, 07:51:19 pm
LOL!  That guy's name is Do-ng without the hyphen. 

So we've got a censoreding censor on here?  I don't know what the censored that is.  censored. 

And what if this mother censoreder Do-ng makes the majors?  Are we not going to be able to censoreding talk about this censoreding ****? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 30, 2011, 07:53:43 pm
Wow, we won't even be able to understand any of Jigs' posts if the censor stays on.

How will we find out how long Do-ng's schlo-ng is if Jigs won't be able to get past the censors?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: AZSteve on March 30, 2011, 08:02:47 pm
Not that I have to used explicit language, but c'mon where's the harm in f**k,sh*t, etc.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 30, 2011, 08:10:45 pm
How will we find out how long Do-ng's schlo-ng is if Jigs won't be able to get past the censors?

May not have to worry.

jiggs says he is not making the move.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 30, 2011, 09:22:55 pm
screw that
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on March 31, 2011, 12:17:32 am
Censorship sips through a straw.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 01, 2011, 12:24:51 pm
Man, how cool would it be to see a future lineup with Pujols, Fukudome and Đong?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 11, 2011, 09:12:30 am
Top Prospect Watch
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 11, 2011, 05:01:47 pm
What about Brett Jackson?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 11, 2011, 05:13:12 pm
What about Brett Jackson?

Here's my source.  They mention Jackson but don't say why he is not on that list.
 
http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/04/cubsminors41111.php#more (http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/04/cubsminors41111.php#more)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 14, 2011, 10:51:56 am
Just posting to get something in here, so that I have a reference post.  I'm trying to figure out how to get straight to new posts or how to know if there are new posts worth checking. 

Jackson has a rather amazing number of singles per balls in play thus far.  He's put the ball in play 15 times thus far (22 AB, 1 HR and 6 K leaves 15 BIP). He's 10/15 on his balls in play, with 8 of those being singles.  When you're hot, you're hot.   :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on April 15, 2011, 01:45:58 pm
Where are the boxscores?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 15, 2011, 03:22:09 pm
Iowa opener

(http://iowa.cubs.milb.com/images/2010/05/10/Lge3eFMd.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 15, 2011, 06:46:52 pm
Iowa, Peoria, and Tennessee all called.  Daytona the only  game in town, and Wallach off to another bad start. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 15, 2011, 06:48:32 pm
The rain in Des Moines may change to snow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 16, 2011, 12:19:26 am
No minor league report from Chris27 (Daytona wasn't rained out and lost to Lakeland 4-3). 
 
At WorldCrossing he pretty much only appeared in On the Farm and Other Sports.  Is there a chance the Createaforum link was never posted in either of those topics?  He is not listed as a member here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on April 16, 2011, 07:12:20 am
I am pretty sure it was posted there as I only read the "On the Farm" and occasionally "Today's Game."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on April 16, 2011, 11:56:10 pm
We need some boxscores
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 17, 2011, 12:02:59 am
It sure looks like Chris is our first MIA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2011, 12:32:24 am
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/minorleagues/affiliates/index.jsp?c_id=chc

Flaherty with two HR's and four hits in the doubleheader, playing SS one game and LF the next, boosting his OPS to 1.188.  Vitters hit a 3-run HR, he's at 1.141 OPS after playing in 8 games.  He and Flaherty have each made one error thus far, none for Lemahieu.  DJ took his first walk of the season.  Tennessee's offense thus far has been incredible.  Cabrera gave up 3 runs in 6 innings. 

JR's guy Eberling got hammered at Daytona but Rosscup gave up no earned runs in 4 innings, although his peripherals were boring (5 hit, 1 K).  He was the lefty in the Garza trade. 

Junior Lake made 3 more errors tonight, and has 6 in 9 games thus far.  Tennessee as a team has 8 errors total. 

Ha had a couple of hits and Cerda had three, including a HR. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 17, 2011, 10:32:59 am
4/17 Minor League report (http://muskat.mlblogs.com/2011/04/17/417-minor-league-report/)
 
 Bryan LaHair had three hits to help Iowa beat Memphis, 4-3, on Saturday. Bobby Scales extended his hit streak to eight games, and is batting .394 in that stretch. Esmailin Caridad notched the save.
 
* Ryan Flaherty hit two home runs and Josh Vitters and Jim Adduci each added one to help Tennessee beat Montgomery 11-7 in the first game of a doubleheader. Alberto Cabrera picked up the win, giving up three runs (two earned) on seven hits over six innings. Flaherty hit a solo homer in the second and a three-run shot in the fourth.
 
In the second game, Ty Wright hit a solo homer to help the Smokies complete a sweep with a 3-1 victory. Brett Jackson extended his hitting streak to nine games and is batting .467 in that stretch. David Cales picked up the save.
 
* Matt Cerda had three hits, including his first homer of the year, and two RBIs but it wasn’t enough as Daytona lost 9-6 to Lakeland. Michael Brenley had three hits. Brent Ebinger took the loss, giving up seven runs on eight hits over three innings.
 
* Peoria’s game against Wisconsin was postponed because of rain and the game will be made up at O’Brien Field since the Chiefs do not return to Wisconsin this half. The two teams play a doubleheader Sunday. Cam Greathouse and Graham Hicks are slated to start.
 
– Carrie Muskat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2011, 05:47:20 pm
Silva: 2-3, 2B, 2 RBI, K

Hatley: 2-0-0-0-1-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_17_peoafx_wisafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Vitters: 1-4, 2 E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_17_monaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Carpenter: 2-1-1-1-2-3, HR, WP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_17_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on April 17, 2011, 07:29:36 pm
27!!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2011, 07:38:17 pm
Didn't know if this was the new destination or not. Feels like a small group, but then it felt like that the last few months on WC.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2011, 07:38:33 pm
Whitenack: 6-3-1-0-1-3, 12-2 GO/FO


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_17_dbcafa_clrafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2011, 08:01:05 pm
Whitenack, woo hoo.  He got a couple of DP's to help him out.  Interesting to see him succeeding in different ways.  Last time 12 K's, this time no K's into the 5th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on April 18, 2011, 01:42:20 am
Don't know what to think with all these amazing starts by hitters...seems like for so long i'd get my hopes up on this guy or that guy and always be disappointed once the season started...only hope they can keep it up(guess i should add within reason so jes doesn't give me a lecture on why it would be impossible for them to keep up at this pace.)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2011, 04:09:36 am
Peoria's 2nd game:


Hicks: 6-4-0-0-0-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_17_peoafx_wisafx_2&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 18, 2011, 07:00:21 am
Nice to see a good outing from Hicks. 

It will be interesting to eventually see more scouting on whitenack.  He's obviously cooking for the moment, although flashing and sustaining are different things.  But his fastball is obviously A-ball effective. 

Fastball effectiveness is a function of velocity, location, and movement.  Clearly his location must be good (1 walk in three starts) and his movement must good (GO/AO).  I wonder if those are so good that he's doing it with average velocity (maybe 88-91 mostly?)  Or if his velocity is pretty good, average or better?  Average or plus velocity combined with plus sink and plus location would make for a very promising fastball, even if it's not 97 mph. 

The lefties haven't been too hot thus far.  Hicks effective, but not sure what he's got for stuff.  Greathouse, Kirk not too hot.  Ebenger or whatever his name is terrible.  Raley and Rusin have been poor.  Obviously Antigua horrific.  It's too bad, I'd been hopeful that the volume of mixed-talent lefties would result in a couple of them stepping up and being significant.  Hopefully that will still happen.  Rosscup has been about the best. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 18, 2011, 08:43:58 am
Very extensive and wide ranging Down On The Farm report
 
http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/04/cubsminors41811.php#more (http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/04/cubsminors41811.php#more)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 18, 2011, 09:47:26 am
For many of the players it may be their only chance to play on a big-league field, but they'll get it June 29. That's when the Peoria Chiefs, the Cubs' affiliate in the Class A Midwest League, play the Wisconsin Timber Rattlers, the Brewers' Midwest League club, in what's being billed as the Border Battle at Miller Park in Milwaukee. Minor-league teams have played there before, the Timber Rattlers four times.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2011, 03:53:50 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_18_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 18, 2011, 05:22:53 pm
ArizonaPhil

of the five Dominican hurlers who threw today, W. Cruz really stood out. He has some nasty stuff.

Craig - there is your left handed pitcher to root for.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2011, 09:14:18 pm
Cerda: 3-4, 2B, RBI, E

Ha: 3-run HR


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_18_dbcafa_clrafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2011, 09:36:52 pm
Flaherty: 3-run HR, BB, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_18_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 18, 2011, 09:48:03 pm
Flaherty not only showing some of the power that had been predicted for him, but he is also making contact and hitting for average.

He has even been playing a few games at shortstop.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 18, 2011, 09:53:31 pm
A little versatility never hurt.

Good to see Flaherty off to a nice start.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2011, 10:03:52 pm
Simpson: 4-6-4-2-2-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_18_peoafx_qcsafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on April 19, 2011, 09:24:21 am
I saw Alberto Cabrera pitch a few nights ago.

He throws very hard [97-98] but he throws a very straight and hittable fastball.

You would think someone with his velocity would have more strikeouts but Montgomery didnt seem to have any trouble making contact.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 19, 2011, 11:37:57 am
Disappointing to see simpson so ineffective and hittable in his last two games, after his nice debut.  As a surprise pick who looked impressive for some games, but other scouts didn't seem to see as much, it makes me worry a little.  (Please chime in now with comments about  patience and not drawing conclusions based on a couple of outings, I get that....)

Last summer I was really excited about last summer's draft picks.  A lot of the mid/late round overslot picks looked really interesting, and there was reason to hope that Szczur, Simpson, Golden, and Wells would all turn out to be value guys based on money and Wilken's evaluations, etc.. 

I have to admit the early returns this month haven't been so encouraging.  Simpson's been ineffective.  Gibbs has a nice OBP for an almost-24-year-old in A-, but after he hit an empty .200 or whatever last year in Boise, I'm not very optimistic that he'll ever be more than a Koyie-type backup.  Ackerman was awful last summer, apparently looked as bad in fall instrux, and hasn't been any better in his first game or two in camp/XST.  Golden re AzPhil is fat, attitudy, and in the couple of box scores I've seen has seemed to be about 1-12 with 4 K's or something.  If Simpson doesn't work out, the top end of the draft could look pretty ugly. 

Greathouse, who looked so interesting last summer, has started badly at Peoria.  Kurcz at daytona. 

Reed was a guy who got some good attention.  I've read no sign of him from Az Phil.  He's not there every day, so he may have just missed him.  But he's been there a lot of days.  Hope he's not hurt or have something wrong.  I'll be relieved if/when I see his name in a Phil-report box score. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 19, 2011, 11:39:38 am
i  "I saw Alberto Cabrera pitch a few nights ago.  He throws very hard [97-98] but he throws a very straight and hittable fastball.  You would think someone with his velocity would have more strikeouts but Montgomery didnt seem to have any trouble making contact."

thanks much for the report, jiggs.  The velocity is encouraging, the "straight" not so much, obviously. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 19, 2011, 11:49:38 am
ArizonaPhil

of the five Dominican hurlers who threw today, W. Cruz really stood out. He has some nasty stuff.

Craig - there is your left handed pitcher to root for.

That's great to read, Dave.  I'd wondered about him, and had him on my list along with the other Dominican League starters. 

Cruz is 20, lists at 6'2".  He was impressive last summer in that he had a 1.52 ERA.  He had some "nasty stuff" splits:  59K/52IP/25H.  In the bigs, maybe if a guy has an unusual BABIP there is some randomness, but I suspect in the DSL it might not be all fluke when guys are averaging less than 1/2 a hit per inning. 

Cruz also may be a wildman, or else a fast riser.  Two summers ago, he had a 6.1 ERA with 43BB/31K/38 IP.  Add in 7 HBP and 11 WP, that's 61 wild-things in 38 IP.  Wow! 

He was still very wild last year, although by comparison it was better:   52IP/32BB/6HBP/5WP.  So 43 wild things per 52 IP, it's progress. 


Gaub seems to have recovered some of his 2009 stuff.  He's got 15 K in 8.1 IP.  That's pretty hard to hit.  6 walks in 8.1 isn't so hot, of course.. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 19, 2011, 11:58:39 am
Iowa is rained out again.  There will be a doubleheader Wednesday afternoon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 19, 2011, 12:26:14 pm
Simpson is going to go down as one of the most puzzling and preposterous draft picks in Cubs history.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 19, 2011, 12:34:59 pm
Just like Colvin
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 19, 2011, 12:47:14 pm
Worse!  At least Colvin got a sniff of the big leagues, and fooled some people into thinking he could be a regular.  Simpson may never get past the FSL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 19, 2011, 12:56:52 pm
Man, I wish I could be such a good judge of baseball talent to know, with such certainty, what kind of careers Colvin and Simpson are going to have at this stage of their development (or earlier), not to mention Vitters.


If I were that good, I could probably make a career out of being a baseball scout or other talent evaluator.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 19, 2011, 12:57:10 pm
I'm sure Simpson's still dealing with the worst case of mono ever to befall on a human being.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 19, 2011, 01:15:11 pm
Well craig, you did say hold back on the patience and it's early kind of stuff, but that is all true.  We're only talking about roughly around 10-11 games for each of our minor league teams so far. 

I'm not terribly encouraged by a lot of the starts we've seen either, but there's still plenty of time and hope for a lot of these guys to redeem themselves.  We saw Simpson flash some good stuff in his first start, and we might find out that these last two starts are just simply nothing to be worried about.  Kurcz had a strong spring and might rekindle some of that soon.  Sczcur has been dealing with leg injuries.  Perhaps Golden gets a wakeup call by being demoted so quickly.

I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on April 19, 2011, 01:46:42 pm
The sky is falling you do know
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on April 19, 2011, 02:02:14 pm
I'm sure Simpson's still dealing with the worst case of mono ever to befall on a human being.

I had mono when i was about 25....I had no energy for 6 months and it was over a year before i finally returned to my pre-mono energy levels....it was not fun.  Its just one of those things you struggle thru until its no more.  If he's still feeling the after effects, the days he doesn't have his best stuff, it'll prollly be a lil tougher to battle thru, but I wouldn't hold any struggles this year against him and still have high hopes for him....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 19, 2011, 02:10:13 pm
Simpson needs to go shoplift some shirts, then he'd get some love.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on April 19, 2011, 03:42:42 pm
All this talk of Simpson, I'm trying to remember that HS lefty they picked a couple years ago from Utah.  What was his name?  That was an awful pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 19, 2011, 03:48:16 pm
Mark Pawelek
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 19, 2011, 04:02:12 pm
Remember Ben Christiansen?  Bobby Browlee? 

Stockstill had some great drafts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2011, 04:25:53 pm
Brownlie was a fine gamble pick at 21. He just suffered arm problems and was never the same pitcher he was as a Freshmen. The Cubs also drafted Luke Hagerty and Chadd Blasko in the sandwich round that year and both looked great before suffering injuries. Likewise Justin Jones in the 2nd round.

Not much you can do about that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on April 19, 2011, 04:58:06 pm
Ah, Pawelek.  It was on the end of my tongue.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on April 19, 2011, 04:59:09 pm
Is he even in baseball now.  I just tried searching his name on MiLB and got nothing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 19, 2011, 05:01:37 pm
Hope he hasn't spent his signing bonus and has to stoop to shoplifting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 19, 2011, 06:30:18 pm
A lot of shoplifting cracks today.  Was someone caught shoplifting recently?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 19, 2011, 07:11:58 pm
Dolis taken out of the game in the third inning because of a sore back.  As far as I can tell, he had given up no runs to that point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2011, 07:46:20 pm
BenBadler‎: Not clear why yet, but Cubs RHP Rafael Dolis left with some type of injury. Didn't appear to be in any pain, throwing 96
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2011, 09:03:19 pm
Ha: 4-5, HR, RBI, CS, PO


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_19_dbcafa_clrafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Chiefs rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 19, 2011, 09:31:26 pm
Ha: 4-5, HR, RBI, CS, PO


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_19_dbcafa_clrafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
..

Dumb Q:  The box score listed Ha as getting picked off and gotten thrown out stealing twice.  So at first I was thinking he'd gotten himself out on the bases on all three of his singles. But after getting picked off he ran for second and got thrown out there, thus the pickoff and one of the CS was on the same play.  On the other CS, Bour whiffed on the same pitch.  Maybe it was a pure steal and he just got nabbed.  But may have been more a hit-and-run type deal. 

I hadn't even realized he'd hit a HR yesterday.  Two HR's two weeks into the season isn't bad.  Would sure be great if he grew into some productive HR power. 

Earlier I'd suggested that some of the summer 2010 draftees havent started well in their first two weeks. 

But overall I'd consider the early start having far more delightful starts than disappointing starts.  Every year guys I hope for disappoint, that's just the nature of the weedout process and it's stunning if it doesn't happen. 

But I think the number of nice starts has more than outweighed the number of poor starts.  Vitters, Jackson, Flaherty, Ha, Silva, Whitenack, Dolis, much more happy stuff than disappointing, IMO.  Granted, I'm probably a "half-full" optimist.  But I'm thrilled. 

I admit it does seem different, though.  Usually we're thin on players and have a volume of pitchers to watch.  It may be that the pool of pitchers isn't as deep or as good as I'd thought.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2011, 10:06:10 pm
Jackson: 0-1, 2 BB, K, HBP, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_19_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 19, 2011, 11:37:56 pm
Brownlie, Hagerty, Blasko, Jones...Wood, Prior...what could have been?

Today, many organizations are CAREFULLY studying film and reviewing mechanics BEFORE drafting at-risk guys (e.g. guys who have a history of arm problems and/or "red flag" mechanical issues such as raising the pitching arm elbow above the plane of the throwing shoulder during the delivery).    Also, an increasing number of organizations have their draftees take 3D biomechanical testing of their throwing motions after the draft process to uncover - and fix - mechanical issues as quickly as possible.

There is NO question but that biomechanical analysis enables frame-by-frame analysis of the pitching motion that the naked eye simply cannot detect.  However, there are still differences of opinion about what constitutes how much risk and what to do to mitigate the risk.

I don't think the Cubs have ever been on the cutting edge of analysis of much of anything though I'll certainly continue to hope that will change someday.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 20, 2011, 04:55:09 pm
Iowa and Peoria both get their doubleheaders in. 

Peoria sweeps, 4-0 and 1-0.   Kirk and Beeler five shutout innings each.  Kirk had the fly-ball thing going well, 3GO/8FO.  Interesting that both pitchers were effective in their first outings (neither allowed an earned run in their first games), both struggled their last start (Kirk gave up a couple HR's in his first inning), now both effective again. 

I don't think the minor league guys go to camp nearly as early as the big-leaguers do.  IIRC, they don't really start until well into March.  It may be that some of the guys weren't very stretched out.  Or, big-leaguers often talk about "dead arm" period a couple of weeks in.  It's possible that the minor leaguers sometimes experience that too, but perhaps it's during April?  I imagine it could also be that you throw carefully in camp, but then you let it rip a little more in your opening start, plus you're going deeper, and then suddenly for start two your arm isn't quite what it was or what it will be.  Just a hypothesis.  Obviously didn't apply to Senior Whitenack. 

Iowa splits, 3-1 (Bibbens with 9 K's), and losing 3-0.   Carpenter with a shutout inning, but a couple of walks. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 20, 2011, 05:01:46 pm
I'll be interested to see how 2011 Carpenter plays out, in relief.  As a starter he wasn't always consistent, and he didn't have great control, but my understanding is that he tended to be a 2-seamer guy who tried to throw heavy contact to a lot of groundouts.  My recall is that he was somewhat groundout-oriented, and last year he was 100K/48BB/5HR/120IP at Tennessee.  Not an overwhelming K-guy, not a horrifically bad walker, and rather favorable anti-HR. 

His early profile at Iowa is different:  11K/6BB/1HR/8IP.  A lot more K's and BB's than before.  And my early impression is that he's gotten a lot of his non-K outs in the air. 

So I'm partly wondering whether he's changing from a pitch-to-contact heavy-2-seam-Guy to a pitch-for-K's high-velocity 4-seam guy with more breaking balls.  Maybe more air balls, and perhaps eventually more HR's.  More K's.  More walks.  More mph, too, which might attract internet attention, maybe some pro-scouting attention too. 

Of course, as JR would say, 8 innings isn't much.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2011, 05:14:21 pm
Iowa  DH:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_20_albaaa_iowaaa_2&t=g_box&did=milb


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_20_albaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2011, 05:16:27 pm
Peoria DH:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_04_20_peoafx_qcsafx_1


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_04_20_peoafx_qcsafx_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2011, 09:01:20 pm
Ha: 2-5, 2B, RBI

Burgess: 1-2, HR, 2 RBI, 2 BB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_20_lakafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2011, 09:08:16 pm
Jackson: 3-4, 2B, 3B, HR, 3 RBI, BB, K



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_20_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 20, 2011, 09:10:49 pm
Jackson: 3-4, 2B, 3B, HR, 3 RBI, BB, K



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_20_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Ok it's time to trade Marlon Byrd
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 20, 2011, 09:14:11 pm
In addition to his .419 BA, Jackson already has 12 BB.  He looks like the real deal.  At some point fairly soon, you start to think about moving somebody and giving him a chance to get his feet wet this season since the Cubs won't be contending.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 20, 2011, 09:22:59 pm
Or, you start to think about moving somebody because he is probably one of the top 3 major league outfielders in the organization and he'll help the Cubs contend this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 20, 2011, 09:39:41 pm
What Brjones said
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 20, 2011, 09:59:04 pm
I'd switch to wine or beer from the hard stuff, Boys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 20, 2011, 10:24:59 pm
Send Tyler Colvin down and promote Brett Jackson.

Then bench Marlon Byrd and let Jackson play for a couple weeks.

OR

DL Carlos Pena, play Colvin at first and bench Byrd, playing Jackson every day until Pena gets his wrist healthy enough to not totally stink up the joint.

After that, demote Colvin or trade Byrd or both.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 20, 2011, 11:06:46 pm
Monster game for Jackson, nice to see some XB power showing.  First HR for Lemahieu. 

Beliveau now at 14K/1BB on the early season.  I know, it's early.  But I'm not sure he's ever gone 8 innings with only one walk before at any stretch.  If he could sustain that, he won't be staying too much longer in A-ball. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2011, 12:24:03 am
Trey McNutt returns tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 21, 2011, 08:50:20 am
That's good, Chris.  I wonder if Rhee will be back soon, too, and if he'll be significantly better this year than last. 

Jackson has quite the amazing line thus far.  .516 BABIP thus far.  Obviously he's not going to sustain that, but he's fairly consistently carried a high BABIP.  I think that's part of the theory, of a guy who is very selective and takes a lot of pitches that he can't handle.  I'd think taking a lot of pitches and putting yourself into a lot of 2-strike counts would probably be bad for BABIP.  Despite his incredible stats thus far, his K-rate is basically as it's usually been.  10K/43 AB, that's not dramatically reduced.  Although relative to his PA, it's pretty fair.  And his walk-rate is higher than ever. 

I know some of the nsbb guys are mad that he's leading off, a waste of his power being the idea, I think, and wanting him to perhaps be groomed to become a high level #3 hitter.  But I have to admit that the prospect of a really productive leadoff guy would be fun.  That wouldn't have to be just OBP; power at leadoff is real value.  And in a sense getting a leadoff who hits with some power and gets on base, that in a sense might enable the GM to try to get more power elsewhere.  For example, if Jackson evolves into a 15-HR guy as a leadoff OBP machine, the GM is unlikely to put a 6-HR guy at the #3 spot.  But if Jackson gets used in the #3 spot, the GM will be perfectly willing to have a 6-HR guy at leadoff.  Probably if he's batting 3rd, he'd probably orient his approach a little bit more towards the power game and less the OBP game, so maybe he'd hit more HR batting 3rd than if he's eventually a career leadoff guy.  But given that the patience/OBP stuff is really his most special attribute, more so than his HR power at present, I think it makes fair sense to keep him in a position where he maximizes his best skill.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 21, 2011, 08:58:39 am
It's great that the Cubs went after Jackson when they did...and that they valued a disciplined, patient hitter for their #1 selection.   Progress.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 21, 2011, 10:05:03 am
I don't remember what the reaction was here when the Cubs drafted Jackson.  Was it as unenthusiastic as when they drafted Vitters or Colvin?  Or was there more love for that pick?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 21, 2011, 10:25:32 am
I know some of the nsbb guys are mad that he's leading off, a waste of his power being the idea, I think, and wanting him to perhaps be groomed to become a high level #3 hitter.     

I think Jackson's a fine prospect, but there's hardly any guarantee he's going to be that level of an impact player where he's a legit #3 hitter in the majors.  He may be nothing more than another Fukudome for instance, and of course, there's always the possibility that he'll be completely baffled by major league pitching and not make it at all.

Whomever these guys at NSBB are need to take a chill pill.  If anything, leading him off means he gets more at bats than anyone on the team, and that can't be anything but good for a top prospect.  Just because they're leading him off in the minors doesn't mean they don't want him to hit 25-30 homers a year down the road.  And I'd agree with you craig, if he turns out to be a 15 HR power tops player, he's not a waste at the top of the order.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 21, 2011, 10:32:28 am
"I think Jackson's a fine prospect, but there's hardly any guarantee he's going to be that level of an impact player where he's a legit #3 hitter in the majors.  He may be nothing more than another Fukudome for instance, and of course, there's always the possibility that he'll be completely baffled by major league pitching and not make it at all"

JR - Can't you say that about EVERY prospect still in the minors?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 21, 2011, 10:42:30 am
Tom, my perceptions are colored by my own views, so I might be way off.  But I think with Jackson the response was much milder.  For a couple of reasons. 

First, he was picked in the 30's instead of at 3 or in the low teens.  So expectations for perfection were moderated.  Second, being picked in the 30's, posters didn't have their hearts set on other players.  Who knew who was better?  NObody is both perfect and high-ceiling in the 30's.   Different with Vitters/Wieters.  Third, Jackson's name had been on the radar, so he didn't seem like a surprise pick or a reach, and he'd been projected higher than that earlier during the spring.  It was understood that his ceiling was pretty high.   

That said, there were naturally a lot of doubts, since he'd been such a K-king in college, and hadn't actually been that productive for long in college.  For me personally, I thought a guy who'd K'd so much seemed a pretty unsafe pick.  One thing that helped is that he signed quickly, quoted well (in contrast to Vitters who came across so poorly), produced really well during his draft summer, and got reviews suggesting that he was really a big-league CFer defensively, and wouldn't need to hit with LF power.  So his fast production worked against having much extended complaint, and muted concerns about his game pretty quickly. 

In the case of Vitters, I think there were a couple of posters who were big Wieters believers both before and after.  When Wieters started blazing and Vitters didn't, that inflamed the complaints.  But I honestly think that for many of us/most of us, at the immediate time of the pick Vitters got mostly favorable reactions.  We'd had enough pitchers who got hurt, and players where hitting was not their best tool and they were taken more for defense or speed (Corey) or batting-practice power (Harvey.)  So for posters like JR and myself, I think we were pretty optimistic about Vitters as a guy whose first tool was hitting and might become a high-average pure-hitting middle-of-the-order power bat.  I think it was mostly later, after he wasn't really hitting that well, or fielding well, and he was was such a flagrantly anti-walk hacker, that the whipping grew.  But I don't think it was very widespread during his draft summer. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: sam hannam on April 21, 2011, 10:44:14 am
Peoria Chiefs pitcher Hayden Simpson.

http://www.pjstar.com/sports/x1410202717/Chief-hurler-has-something-to-build-on
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on April 21, 2011, 11:06:21 am
For me, the Jackson pick was fine.  Like Craig said it was in the 30s so I didn't have any high expectations because the Cubs were terrible at drafting long shots.  But what else are you getting in that position?  The only thing I was worried about was his k'ing, but to his credit he also walked a lot.  So I thought it was a pretty good risk.

On Vitter/Wieters, I was a big Wieters fan.  I think you know more what you are getting from a big time college program than a HS player.  Plus Wieters was a switch hitting catcher with power and patience.  What was not to like?  Seemed like a logical pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 21, 2011, 11:25:28 am
I have to admit, I don't think I remember anyone liking the Jackson pick.  Everyone at the time was scared of the high strikeout totals he had at Cal and thought Wilken was making another "old school" scouting pick. 

I don't think it was so much that anyone had someone better in mind than Jackson for that pick.  I think everyone saw those high K totals he had in college and automatically thought for sure he wouldn't be able to handle professional pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 21, 2011, 11:44:13 am
Thanks for the recollections, guys.  I honestly didn't remember, and I guess memories vary.  That's not surprising.


As is pretty much always the case, we'll have to wait to see how all these guys (Jackson, Vitters, Colvin, Simpson) turn out - as well as how their competition turns out.


After a very disappointing year in 2010, Wieters is off to a better start this year, as far as power, at least, and he's certainly young enough (24) that he can still live up to the lofty expectations that many had for him. Wieters is three years older than Vitters, so Vitters has a while before he can be fairly compared to Wieters, as far as major league readiness.   Vitters is off to a very encouraging start this year - he may well figure things out at least as soon as Wieters, in terms of age.  But of course, he may still be a bust.


I think it's perfectly natural that people disagree about the likelihood of various prospects succeeding.  What I don't quite understanding is the ****-sure certainty that some people have about guys the Cubs pick being busts - before they have a chance to prove themselves.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 21, 2011, 11:53:09 am
Weren't we told by some genius this spring that Wieters was officially a bust?  Well, he has 3 HR, 11 RBI and a 57% CS% so far this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 21, 2011, 11:59:33 am
regarding jackson's discipline (someone mentioned his selection was a sign of an evolving draft perspective favoring patience) jackson k'd a TON in college, and while he drew some walks, they were not nearly enough to balance out the k's. if anything, jackson strikes me as a quintessential wilken pick: up the middle, athletic, toolsy guy. jackson was not selected because of his performance, but because of his projection. wilken was pretty adamant that jackson's k's were going to come down, and it's that kind of evaluation (toolsy guy with projection) that led to his selection. many industry talking heads were quite concerned about his k profile.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 21, 2011, 12:57:04 pm
Didn't one of the ESPN guys gush over Jackson as the best hitter in the draft?  For some reason I thought it was Harold Reynolds.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 21, 2011, 12:59:42 pm
I believe I correctly predicted the Brett Jackson pick and I disliked it.

My reasons for disliking it were that he didn't have great numbers at Cal for a college hitter with a metal bat and he swung and missed quite a lot.

After the draft, I saw a lot of video on Jackson and I liked what I saw.  His swing was pretty similar to Will Clark's and I thought it probably had some potential for power down the road.

Also, once Jackson signed and started playing in the minors, he produced pretty good numbers.

So, I became a believer and I think he's going to be a good Major Leaguer.

I still have no faith in Josh Vitters.  As I've often said, I just don't like when a hitter has recurring hand/wrist injuries.  Plus, his defense is suspect.  His hack away approach hasn't really improved and the Cubs have shown no track record of success handling hitters with these issues.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 21, 2011, 01:02:13 pm
Josh Vitters reminds me too much of David Kelton
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 21, 2011, 03:39:41 pm
I'm on the Vitters bandwagon for the moment.  I reserve the right to jump off whenever I want.  And I have to admit that with prospects, I'm very what-have-you-done lately.  That sounds fickle, but I think it makes a lot of sense since prospects can change pretty quickly. 

What I do know is that Vitters has a widely regarded excellent swing, a very pretty swing.  And when he's swinging right and approaching things right, he's an excellent contact hitter.  And I know that he's got real power potential. 

I also know that for the moment, he's 21 years old and he's opened this season with 43 AB small sample in which he's hitting .326, OBP'ing at .383, slugging, and OPS'ing at .964.  Those are some really good numbers for a 21-year-old in AA.  And he's got a 3BB/3K line. 

In common with Kelton is that they are 3B with pretty swings and some power potential.  Kelton really had only one noteworthy season, also at AA and also at age 21, where he hit .312 with a .927 OPS, not much worse than Vitters is doing.  And Kelton sustained that for 224 AB rather than the tiny 43AB sample of Vitters. 

But, we KNOW that Kelton could never reproduce that, and until he proves otherwise I hope/believe that Vitters can. 

Second, even in that flukishly good 2-month season that Kelton had, he was still whiffing 25% of his AB, unlike Vitters who's currently at 7%.  So I think the red flag that Kelton had trouble hitting the ball, breaking balls in particular, was evident.  Whereas there is no such red flag for Vitters. 

I didn't rank Vitters super high this winter, maybe 7th or so on my list, after he hit .223 in AA last summer.  And I know he's always been a hot-and-cold guy who hasn't fallen into his first big slump this year, and I know he will sooner or later.  But I'm pretty optimistic that he's got the talents to be a good average/power hitter.  And as short as this April has been, I'm pretty fired up about what he's done during these two weeks and it's clearly elevated my hopes for him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 21, 2011, 03:52:48 pm
Vitters has a pretty steady track record of stinking it up at every level and then impressing when he repeats it, so this should come as no surprise to anyone.

In truth, his numbers are good for a 21 year-old at AA.  So I suppose there's still hope - though I won't believe until he shows he can consistently draw a few walks.  I'm also not convinced he can stick at 3B, and he doesn't figure to produce enough offense to be of value as a 1B.  At least with Jackson his glove has never been in question, and he's always showed a lot of patience.  The Cubs have never seemed to value guys like that much, which is why Jackson is exciting and I hated to see Hak dealt.  Vitters, to me, is a one-trick pony - he doesn't figure to be a positive in any way except with his bat.  He's not a base stealer, his defense is going to be average at the very best, and he's not going to be an OBP guy.  That's a razor-thin margin for error.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2011, 04:35:47 pm
On the subject of Jackson leading off...

"I'm really learning to love leading off," said Jackson, who usually batted second after being promoted to Double-A midway through last season. "I like making things happen, and with the way this team can knock the ball around, anytime you get on base there is a good chance you'll be able to come around and score."

Batting first with the Smokies is also good training for what might eventually be Jackson's role once he reaches the Major Leagues.

"There is no true leadoff hitter in Chicago right now, so this could benefit my future with the Cubs," Jackson said. "I'm really enjoying batting first. Hopefully, the experience will pay off now and later.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110418&content_id=17943004&vkey=news_milb&fext=.jsp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 21, 2011, 04:53:14 pm
Vitters ... numbers are good for a 21 year-old at AA.  So I suppose there's still hope - though I won't believe until he shows he can consistently draw a few walks.  .....  Vitters, to me, is a one-trick pony - he doesn't figure to be a positive in any way except with his bat.  He's not a base stealer, his defense is going to be average at the very best, and he's not going to be an OBP guy.  That's a razor-thin margin for error.

That's a two-trick pony in my book.  Average and power.  And those are the two most important tricks a baseball position-playing pony can have. 


I also think that when a guy has the contact gift to the tune of 3 K's/43 AB, the margin may not be as razor thin. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 21, 2011, 05:05:25 pm
John Gaub is quietly off to a fairly decent start for Iowa.     15 Ks in 8.1 innings but a few too many walks (6)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=453304
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 21, 2011, 07:54:33 pm
ArizonaPhil on the EXT Cubs

While the Cubs pitchers allowed only three hits, they did walk nine (three scored), hit a batter, and threw two wild pitches. Also, the Angels stole seven bases (no CS), and the Cubs infield defense was not exactly air-tight, committing three throwing errors

No wonder he likes to go to those games.  The quality there is obviously the same as the big league club.

By the way - the "throw and catch" catcher Cabaza threw out zero runners in 5 tries.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 21, 2011, 07:56:08 pm
I keep getting excited about the great start Jackson and some of the others have had until I remember that Luis Montanez in hitting over 400 in Iowa

By the way, in his first start of the season, Jay Jackson has allowed no runs in three innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 21, 2011, 08:01:05 pm
Let's cut through all the nonsense and get to the bottom line.

Tim Wilken is an absolute joke and very possibly the worst scouting director in MLB.

The Cubs minor league talent is the worst in MLB.  Its top-end talent is a collection of future bench players and middle relievers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2011, 08:47:50 pm
Jackson: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI, K

McNutt: 4-8-3-2-1-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_21_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Burgess: 2-4, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_21_lakafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 21, 2011, 09:03:39 pm
Jackson is out of his mind right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2011, 09:29:37 pm
Jackson: 5-2-2-2-1-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_21_albaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2011, 09:40:03 pm
Peoria game completed early.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_21_belafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2011, 10:43:03 pm
BA's Ben Badler watching the Smokies tonight:

Brett Jackson just dropped the barrel on a fastball low and away, crushed a HR oppo to left field
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 21, 2011, 10:59:10 pm
Nice.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 21, 2011, 11:39:40 pm
Let him try his luck at Iowa, at least.  Nothing to prove at AA after already excelling there last season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 22, 2011, 12:14:20 am
I'm not sure that Iowa is much tougher than the Southern League.  The Cubs seem to have decent success just bringing players up from Tennessee
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 22, 2011, 12:54:24 am
Yeah, the Cubs seem to like to stashing AAAA guys at Iowa for the most part and prefer to use AA as the prospect garden.

But since Jackson seems to just be throttling AA right now, maybe they should promote him in May and give him a look against some more experienced pitchers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 22, 2011, 02:43:06 am
That's my thinking.  It's become the norm for teams to keep their top prospects at AA and populate AAA with AAAA guys, but Jackson is kind of different in that he's already torched AA and has nothing to prove there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 22, 2011, 08:08:27 am
That's my thinking.  It's become the norm for teams to keep their top prospects at AA and populate AAA with AAAA guys, but Jackson is kind of different in that he's already torched AA and has nothing to prove there.

I don't think I agree, really.  He's torched AA for two weeks this April, and it's only in the last few days with much XBH power. 

Last year, he hit .276 with an .831 OPS at AA, with much of that damage during his first hot splash there.  After his first five games, I think his OPS was sub-.800. Perfectly excellent developmentally for a young 21-year-old going through his first July-August as a full-season guy and with some tired legs toward the end, I'm not criticizing at all.  Just that it wasn't really "torching" by any stretch. 

this is.  I've got no problem with a promotion, but neither would I have any problem with letting him sustain this for a while.  It may be that he's just too good and will remain sustainably too good for AA.  But it wouldn't bother me if he stayed there and showed that he could sustain it for a while. 

I'm assuming Jackson is for real, and that this isn't a Chad Meyers/Felix Pie/Matt Murton/Jake Fox kind of thing.  But if he's for real, staying there and sustaining won't hurt him any. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 22, 2011, 09:33:02 am
That's my thinking.  It's become the norm for teams to keep their top prospects at AA and populate AAA with AAAA guys, but Jackson is kind of different in that he's already torched AA and has nothing to prove there.

I disagree a little bit with what a lot of you guys are saying about the jump from Double-A to Triple-A.  While there might be more "prospects" in Double-A, I think it's important to remember that a lot of players considered "prospects" there like the Dwayne Bacon's and Jaisen Randolph's of the world just aren't very good players.  Players like Bobby Scales, Brad Snyder, and Bryan LaHair may not be "prospects" anymore, but they're certainly better players than most on the Smokies roster or in the Southern League.

The quality of play from Double-A to Triple-A is a pretty significant one I think.  There are a lot more players in Triple-A who are either experienced major league players or are major league caliber but haven't had a full chance to show it.  It's a significant jump facing 28 to 32 year old players who know what they're doing as opposed to leagues where David Kelton or Richard Lewis can look like world beaters or where you are facing teams that are still devoting lots of playing time to "prospects" like Jaisen Randolph, Jeff Goldbach, or Jason Smith. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 22, 2011, 10:04:26 am
Those are good points, JR.  All the AAA guys were good AA guys once. 

Certainly AA has more big talents, guys who will eventually outmatch AAA and move on to successful big-league careers.  You don't often go through an AAA rotation with Dolis, Cabrera, and McNutt all throwing 95 or better.  AAA journeymen have some limits and are there for a reason, so certainly the best of AA are more talented than AAA people.  But the overall quality of AA isn't as good.  There are a lot of AA guys who will never be good enough to become AAA journeymen. 

One change I think is that Tennessee now seems to be a pretty strong hitters park.  Back in the WTenn days when they had the bad CF background, the difference in hitter-friendliness of AA and PCL seemed enormous.  If a guy could hit for WTenn, I'd figure he'd usually hit in AAA.   But there were tons of pitchers with good numbers in Pringles who got badly exposed in PCL.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 22, 2011, 12:43:10 pm
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2011/2611613.html (http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2011/2611613.html)

No. 6    BRETT JACKSON

On Ha:  "Cubs CF Jae-Hoon Ha has caught scouts' eyes in the Florida State League with eye-popping numbers to start the season. He is hitting .403/.406/.645 through 14 games with a pair of home runs. He has not drawn a walk yet and is only 2-for-7 on stolen base attempts, but manager Buddy Bailey is pleased with the 20-year old's aggressive approach. "He's got one gait and it's always aggressive," Bailey said. "To me, it's the perfect thing for a young player. Players learn when they're aggressive.""



Interesting comment.  In terms of baserunning and base-stealing, I think the comment may have a lot of merit. 


In terms of hitting, I'd think pitch selection and plate discipline would kind of require some practice taking some bad or borderline pitches.  But, I'm just a fan and not a trained professional baseball teacher like Bailey and the other guys selected and hired by Hendry and Fleita. 


It may perhaps provide some context for the routinely low-walk low-IsoD profile for so many prospects coming out of Daytona (Barney, Lemahieu, Vitters, now Ha...)  Clearly they weren't pushed to take too many pitches or pad their OBP with walks at Daytona.  Perhaps their low walk rates won't mean they don't have the physical capacity, and that if at some late point in their career/development they are persuaded that taking more pitches and more walks is very important and beneficial (to their careers and to their team and to winning...), perhaps some of them have more capacity that we expect? 


My feeling has always been that for high-K guys who don't have the gift of contact, trying to walk more and take more pitches might never be realistic (Corey, Harvey, Dopirak....)  But for the many pure-contact guys that we've had lately (Barney, Vitters, Lemahieu, Ha, Szczur, Silva...), I still have the notion that they might eventually have the capacity to take more walks as major leaguers than they did in A-ball. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 22, 2011, 12:55:01 pm
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2011/2611613.html (http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2011/2611613.html)
But, I'm just a fan and not a trained professional baseball teacher like Bailey and the other guys selected and hired by Hendry and Fleita.

Awesome.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 22, 2011, 01:19:14 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vg5gPnUdbc8
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 22, 2011, 01:23:26 pm
Hey, look, JR found a clip from when SNL was funny.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on April 22, 2011, 02:06:05 pm
Phil Hartman was the best.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 22, 2011, 02:16:19 pm
Yeah, but which of those SNL guys is in our farm system?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 22, 2011, 03:08:54 pm
Like many above, I have no strong feelings either way.  At Iowa, Jackson would see quite a few more experienced pitchers who would show him better breaking pitches and perhaps better command.  On the other hand, since many teams keep their better prospects in AA, at Iowa he might face fewer overpowering, promising pitchers.  What you gain with one, you lose with the other.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 22, 2011, 04:54:30 pm
 Daytona Lineup 4/22

Lake SS
Cerda DH
Ha CF
Bour 1B
Burgess RF
Brenly C
Opitz 3B
Macias LF
Watkins 2B
RHP Whitenack (2-0, 1.06)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2011, 04:56:34 pm
Chiefs rained out yet again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 22, 2011, 06:39:05 pm
Two innings in for Daytona, 1-0.  Whitenack fans the first four Lakeland Flying Tigers, before the fifth guy manages a popout.  Sixth guy K's.  The breaking ball must be breaking tonight.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 22, 2011, 07:24:28 pm
Bad news on Whitenack.  Through 5 full innings, he has only struck out 7.

Perfect game so far, though
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 22, 2011, 07:29:21 pm
Burgess already has 6 HR, I see.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2011, 08:40:38 pm
Whitenack: 6-2-1-1-0-7

Batista: 1-1-0-0-0-1, SV , ( 4 Svs, 5-1/3 IP, 1 H, 1 BB, 7 K )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_22_dbcafa_lakafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2011, 09:07:23 pm
Vitters: 0-4, [1 for last 14]


Jackson DNP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_22_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2011, 09:33:00 pm
Iowa game over early due to rain:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_22_albaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2011, 01:52:36 am
Kevin Goldstein responding on Twitter:

Tall, downhill FB w/sink; true plus curve. Prospect, but not huge RT @Carl9730: @Kevin_Goldstein What do you know about Robert Whitenack?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2011, 10:12:24 am
Thanks, chris.  That's a fairly cautious, muted report.  Prospect but not huge, perhaps about as low as you can go for a guy who's started like this.  Probably reflects his limited fastball.  Or, maybe Goldstein isn't totally up on him yet. 

The interesting thing is that he calls it a "true plus curve"; AzPhil called it a killer "splitter"; Dave's scouting friend called it "knuckle curve". 

Whatever it is is whatever it is, but it sounds like when it's working it's a plus pitch. 

But it seems pretty likely, as was true last year, that if his breaking ball isn't clicking and if he's not locating really well, that probably his stuff will look pedestrian.  like anybody, it's a function of control and stuff, and his control will probably need to continue to be well above average. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 23, 2011, 11:21:40 am
I know this is a minor quibble, but it's something that I think shows the lack of creativity in the Cubs organization.

But why isn't Luis Montanez or Marquez Smith playing any first base?  Right now Darwin Barney is more or less the platoon partner for Carlos Pena.  Playing first base ought to be an easy transition for either one of them, and since it'd give them a chance to get to the big leagues more quickly, either would probably jump at the chance to try first base if anyone bothered to ask. 

The Cubs just don't think outside the box enough on things like that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 23, 2011, 11:44:48 am
I remember a Cubs pitching prospect who won a lot of games in the minor leagues but was downgraded by scouts and observers because his stuff wasn't exceptional.  So nobody complained when he was traded to the Marlins for Juan Pierre.

I wonder what ever happened to the guy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 23, 2011, 11:45:44 am
What are all y'alls take on Rafael Dolis?  He never seems to get talked about here, but he's starting to get lots of buzz in the mainstream press - "97 MPH heat, devastating slider", etc.  But his overall minor-league stats are hardly impressive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 23, 2011, 01:01:11 pm
Right now Darwin Barney is more or less the platoon partner for Carlos Pena. 

I think you meant Jeff Baker, right?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2011, 01:27:26 pm
Tom, I think he means Barney. 

Versus LHP, Baker is going to start either way, the question is who's the second guy.  Pena, starting versus LHP?  Or Barney, starting vs LHP?  Or Lou Montanez or somebody else from Iowa? 

I agree with JR that there ought to be somebody with more bat versus LHP than either Pena or Barney, and that it would make sense to give Montanez some time at 1B. 

Heh, who knows, if Rebel Ridling keeps hitting at AA for another two months, perhaps he could get that opportunity. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 23, 2011, 01:32:10 pm
I think you meant Jeff Baker, right?

No I meant Barney. 

Baker is always an automatic start against LHP.  The choice lately has been whether to keep Pena or Barney in the lineup against lefties, and Quade lately has been choosing to keep Barney. 

The Cubs need to think of a way to do better than that.  Pena really doesn't need to face lefties, but keeping Barney in the lineup on those days is not the most optimal way to go about it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 23, 2011, 01:32:51 pm
So, seriously, the suggestion is that against lefties Montanez should be in the lineup instead of Barney?  Maybe Barney will tank at some point, but he certainly has not yet, and I find it hard to imagine Montanez would be doing better than Barney is at this point.


But, hey, the grass is always greener, so I'm probably wrong.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 23, 2011, 01:34:57 pm
Or what craig said.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 23, 2011, 01:47:57 pm
I really don't understand why Barney continues to get such little respect.  He may well tank, but he certainly hasn't yet.  Why would anybody want to replace him in the lineup with someone else (much less Montanez) right now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 23, 2011, 01:52:34 pm
I suspect there are two factors at play.  First, many posters are so vested in the thought that the Cubs farm system sucks that it is difficult to believe that a particular product of that system might be good.  And second, when Barney effectively plays first base, he does not have the power potential that we would usually wish for from that position.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 23, 2011, 01:54:53 pm
Who's arguing that Barney should be benched now?  I think the point - a good one - is that he's likely to revert to a sub-.700 OPS guy based on his career so far.  Low walks, no power is a bad combination and he's likely to find his level sooner or later.  He's certainly a major-league player and who knows, maybe he'll shock and be a perennial .300 hitter.  If he doesn't hit .300, though, he's likely to be a net minus offensively based on his other numbers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 23, 2011, 01:58:07 pm
Darwin Barney = Sam Fuld?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2011, 02:10:03 pm
I agree with Tom, that posters do tend to doubt that a guy on a hot streak will stay hot forever.  Which makes sense.  Barney has been a long-standing no-walk no-power singles hitter in the minors.  So when he has a big-league month at .333, it's natural and logical to anticipate that he'll likely revert to or below his minor league average. 

It's probably kind of old-fashioned and traditional, but I think a lot of us still envision 1B as being a position where good teams normally have a hitter with some power and OPS and all those kinds of shallow things. 

Hendry has instead taken a creative and innovative approach in which it's a defensive position.  Pena is hitting .180 with one double on the season; and versus LHP he's replaced with no-walks-no-power singles Barney. 

I agree with deeg that it's doubtful that Barney will end up hitting .330 or winning the batting title, although I hope he does.  But I also agree withTom that it's not exactly all that likely that some journeyman like Louis Montanez would hit any better than Barney, even if Montanez could play 1B. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 23, 2011, 02:15:00 pm
I agree with deeg that it's doubtful that Barney will end up hitting .330 or winning the batting title, although I hope he does.  But it's not exactly all that likely that some journeyman like Louis Montanez would hit any better than Barney, even if he could play 1B. 


Obviously, no one has suggested Barney will end up hitting .330 - that's just a straw man.


But as craig says, it's not like putting Montanez at 1B and Baker at 2b, instead of having Baker (who has show pretty good power against lefties I seem to recall) at 1B and Barney at 2B would be an improvement.  It would almost certainly weaken the defense on the right side though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2011, 02:56:31 pm
I agree with your point, Tom.  If you're going to replace Barney with somebody else at 1B versus LHP, you'll weaken your 2B defense with Baker, and it may be that if it's some inexperienced 1B (such as somebody like Louis Montanez would be), you'll possibly weaken 1B relative to having Baker there.  Those "weakenings" might be modest, so if you had a 1B you liked as a hitter with some punch and some OBP potential, that might be worth it.  Perhaps that could be true with either Montanez or Marques Smith.  But it's certainly also possible that they wouldn't add anything offensively, and might hit worse than Barney does, while weakening two positions defensively. 

I do think that Hendry might have been wise to sign a RH non-roster AAAA 1B for Iowa.  It shouldn't be totally shocking that an aging injury-prone lefty who hit sub-.200 last year might struggle versus LHP.  And it was anticipated from the start that Baker would play 2B versus LHP, even had DeWitt won the LH platoon job. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2011, 03:42:56 pm
Hicks getting shut out 1-0 in the 4th.  But he's 7K/1BB through 4, allowed a HR in the first. 

Game one:  6walks/0K
Game two:  0 walks/4 K
Today:  1 walk/7 K (thus far)

Would be fun if he's getting somethng figured out and will turn out to be interesting for us. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2011, 05:02:50 pm
Peoria DH:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_23_belafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Szczur: 1-4 , (6 for last 32)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_23_belafx_peoafx_2&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2011, 05:09:22 pm
Szczur's hit was a bunt in the last inning, and he scored the winning run. 

Alcantara got 3 singles in the DH, and has his average up to .289.  He'll be 19 all year, and by some accounts has some flashy SS tools (quick, range, big arm).  His early 9K/3BB/45AB split are unimpressive but not red-flag bad either. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2011, 07:52:44 pm
Lake: 4-5, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, 2 SB , (10 for last 20; still 0 walks)

Struck: 5-1/3 -4-2-2-2-7

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_23_dbcafa_dunafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Vitters: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_04_23_tenaax_jaxaax_1




Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2011, 10:09:42 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_23_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2011, 11:14:18 pm
Nice to see struck with a really good outing.  He had a 7K/0BB/2hit game entering the 6th, obviously his longest outing.  And then the reliever allowed one of his runners in. 

Would be fun if Hicks had improved his control and his breaking ball so that he could merit interest.  We'll see. 

Micah Gibbs is hitting over .300 with excellent K/BB.  He appears to have sub-Barney power.  Given how old he is, that he didn't hit in Boise, didn't make daytona, and started off slow the first few games, I kind of lost track of him.  Plus, being a catcher who's down in the order, and being a catcher who only starts half the games, he's easy to forget. 

He's got some funny stuff for the moment.  How often does a guy have an OBP that's 100 points higher than his slugging?  His OBP is .475, he's slugging .375, he's hitting .344.  (One double thus far.)  As a big-time LSU/SEC guy who's almost 24, you'd think he should have learned to become most of what he can be. 

But there can be some big-league opportunity for a switch-hitting good-chemist catcher, if his OBP can be good enough, even if he has no power. 

Odd that a guy who weighs so much should be so powerless, though. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 24, 2011, 08:10:11 am
I don't want to go all Scotti and respond line by line to some of the Barney/Montanez discussion, but a few random thoughts I had as I was reading everyone's posts on the subject.

1.  I wasn't just talking about Montanez, and I'm really not just talking about Marquez Smith either.  When you have a guy like Jeff Baker who can play an adequate 2B and hit like Chase Utley against LHP, it's a waste to keep a low .700 OPS hitter in the lineup when there are plenty of right handed first basemen out there who can hammer lefties.  You're really losing a lot of offensive potential against lefties when you don't take advantage of Baker's ability to play second base adequately, and I don't think Barney's glove makes up for that.

Trying to see if Montanez or Smith could handle first is at least a way to find out if you can find a power hitting right handed first baseman internally.  If it doesn't work, I think Hendry should be at least on the lookout for one.   

2.  Do I actually believe someone like Montanez could be a better hitter against LHP than Barney?  I don't have a lot of evidence to back it up, but yeah I do.  Montanez had a .986 OPS in his last full minor league season, and he has a 1.157 OPS this year.  Call it a gut feeling, but Montanez probably has figured things out as a minor league hitter.  And even with all of the lousy early minor league seasons Montanez had, his career .784 minor league OPS is better than Barney's career .708 minor league OPS. 

And I think it's also quite likely Marquez Smith would be better.   He's always been a more productive hitter than Barney in the minors (.839 OPS to .708).

3.  I don't think we'd be losing nearly as much defense as you'd think.  After all, Baker isn't exactly a longtime first baseman himself. 

All the metrics indicate Baker is at least an adequate defensive second baseman.  We do lose something defensively with him at second, but his .920 OPS vs. LHP more than makes up for it.

And I doubt the difference between an relatively inexperienced Baker at 1B and someone like Montanez with a month of Iowa 1B or a guy moving over from third base like Marquez Smith is a very big defensive difference.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 24, 2011, 08:32:05 am
You may well be right, JR. 

I think the point holds that whether it's Smith or MOntanez or somebody else, that there should be SOMEBODY with more hitting potential available than a career .708. 

I suspect that there were some 25-30-year-old AAAA RH 1B/LF types who were rolling around this winter who could field 1B as well as Baker, with more power/OPS potential than .708.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 24, 2011, 09:13:29 am
One other thing, I'm not even saying play them at first and call them up from Iowa in a week.  Give them some time there so maybe a month or two from now, it's an option you can consider if you do want to add a right handed 1B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 24, 2011, 09:49:17 am
I think it's fine to make whatever preparations they can in case Barney becomes unacceptable.  In the meantime, he's been one of the few bright spots for the Cubs and should continue to play regularly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on April 24, 2011, 02:39:24 pm
I really do think it's pretty cool to see Sam Fuld doing what he's doing.

I never believed in him and even though he was a tremendous CFer he couldnt hit much at all.

Most of the people at Smokies Park thought he was great though.

As far as Brett Jackson goes I know I liked the pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 24, 2011, 02:54:07 pm
Kurcz: 7-5-1-1-3-9

Ha: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, assist;  still walkless for the season



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_24_dbcafa_dunafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Peoria idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 24, 2011, 04:00:24 pm
In addition to his .419 BA, Jackson already has 12 BB.  He looks like the real deal.  At some point fairly soon, you start to think about moving somebody and giving him a chance to get his feet wet this season since the Cubs won't be contending.

Yea.... that was what I was saying in December.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 24, 2011, 04:38:46 pm
Gaub: 1 IP, 3 K , (18 K in 9 1/3 IP)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_24_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 24, 2011, 05:21:17 pm
Flaherty: 2-4, HR, RBI, K

Vitters: 0-2, E





http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_24_tenaax_jaxaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on April 24, 2011, 07:20:56 pm
The sons of two former Chicago Cubs will be drafted highly in this June MLB draft Shawon Dunston Jr and Dwight Smith Jr. It will be interesting to see if the Cubs show interest in either young man. Both are OFers and bat left-handed. Dunston is committed to Vanderbilt if he doesn't sign this year and Smith has committed to Georgia Tech.

I just happened to stumble across some info on these two youngsters this weekend, a SS who is committed to an SEC school was asked who were the top players he's played with and he mention Dunston and Smith.

http://yankees.scout.com/2/1046336.html

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/high-school/2010/08/wrigley-recap/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 24, 2011, 07:29:29 pm
Shawon Dunston is about the classiest player I've met in pro sports.  Glad to see his son's having success.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 24, 2011, 07:51:10 pm
Totally agree on Dunston.

He looks like he could still play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 24, 2011, 09:06:52 pm
I would love for the Cubs to get Shawon JR.  His father was always one of my favorites, both for his actions on the field and off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 24, 2011, 09:25:07 pm
I always liked Dunston myself, even if he was enormously frustrating at times.  He seemed to love the game and brought great enthusiasm with him to the ballpark everyday.

That said, with today's fans, at least the ones on forums such as this one, he'd be anything but a favorite, given his complete lack of plate discipline and the fact that he never had an OBA above .320 as a Cub, with it falling below .300 some years.  And he typified the talented SS who would make great plays to be followed by awful throwing errors (or near errors saved by Mark Grace) on what should have been easy ones.

Fans (Cub fans anyway) are much tougher on players today than in those days.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 24, 2011, 10:20:45 pm
Shawon Dunston had great enthusiasm but never saw a slider in the dirt he didn't swing at.

If Dunston were playing today, he would deserve every bit of criticism he would get for his poor pitch recognition, booting of routine grounders and base running blunders.

Just because a dude has a nice smile it doesn't make him immune from legitimate criticisms.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 24, 2011, 10:33:15 pm
I loved the way he played the game. He always gave 100% despite being on mostly bad teams.  And he always played with joy and respect for the game. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 24, 2011, 10:49:45 pm
Kurtz actually pitched 4, not 7 innings.  Still, his best appearance thus far. 

Daytona has had some really good relief.  Roderick pitched 5th-7th, and he's been good. Lorick, I think in the DLee trade?, has been good.  Batista gave up his first runs today.  Latham has been good.  Not sure which if any have big-league potential, but for those that don't you can't much tell from their results thus far. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 25, 2011, 12:13:47 am
Steve Stone always thought Shawon Dunston had the arm to be a pitcher.  I wonder if anybody ever gave that serious consideration.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2011, 01:47:34 am
Dunston was so raw in his throws from short, I can only imagine how hard it would've been to turn him into a legitimate pitcher. Plus, not sure he had the proper temperament to be a pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 25, 2011, 06:15:45 am
Dunston was a classic case of being rushed to the bigs too early.  He should have been left in the minors until he figured out the strike zone.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 25, 2011, 06:31:14 am
Most of those jokes about Dunston as a pitcher came from the fact that he was #1 draft pick in '82 while Doc Gooden was #5.  The joke was that when the Cubs scouts were asked why Dunston was chosen ahead of Gooden, it was because Dunston had the better arm.   I thought I heard once that they were cousins as well, but can't find any confirmation of that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 25, 2011, 08:16:12 am
Interesting comp for Brett Jackson in the BA hot sheet chat but one that sounds pretty reasonable to me except a few more walks for Jackson.

DrewBoke (IL): Best case scenario for Brett Jackson, ..... a healthy Grady Sizemore?

Matthew Eddy: I really Cubs Double-A CF Brett Jackson's well rounded game, but I think a Sizemore-in-his-prime comp is a bridge too far. I'm tempted to say that Jackson could be a Curtis Granderson type as a lefty hitter who's athleticism and defensive range might be a bit undersold. Granderson had similar over-the-fence power at Jackson's age. Oh, and the strikeouts are always going to be part of the package.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 25, 2011, 09:19:13 am
Jackson has been hot offensively. 

Perhaps a reminder of why I shouldn't conclude too much from a 15-game stretch is that he's just one of five Smokies in the top-15 OPS in the Southern League.  In order, the five are: 

3  Rebel Ridling
4  Jackson
7  Flaherty
10  Adduci
15  Steve Clevenger. 

Obviously at 22 Jackson is in a different place than the other four, each of whom is 24 (Flaherty, Ridling) or older (Clevenger turned 25 this month and Adduci will hit 26 next month).  But it's a reminder that since other players who are probably not big-league capable or ready can produce similarly, Jackson's stretch isn't on it's own sufficient to prove that he's ready to be a productive big-league regular. 

I'm somewhat interested in Clevenger's hitting.  As a catcher who bats low in the order and sits a lot (the Cubs give their minor league catchers a lot of off days), it's easy for me to skim over him in the boxes and in my mind.   
*This is his 4th years at Tenn, and he hit .290 and .317 the previous two seasons, so his .292 average thus far is fairly modest and not at all anomolous. 
*But his .563 slugging is non-standard.  He's got 3 HR already; until last year 3 was his season max, and last year he jumped from 1 HR in 2009 to 5 HR in 2010. 
*7 of 14 hits XBH.  In 2009, he had 21 XBH all year (89 hits, 307 AB). 
*Slugging:  2009 .378 (0.088 IsoP); 2010 .461 (.144 IsoP); thus far in 2011 .563 (.271 IsoP). 

Clearly based on his history his early slugging is very flukish, at least the magnitude of it.  But I admit I'm interested to watch whether there might be something real to it.  If he went from .088 IsoP to .144 last year, perhaps he's ready to add another 40 points or so?  Maybe he's ready to push toward an 8-10 HR guy rather than the 1-3 guy he was prior to last summer?  If he hit .290, with a .180 IsoP, and with his typical IsoD around 50 or better, perhaps you'd have a .290/.345/.470/.815 AA catcher.  At 25, and with no rocket arm, that's not going to be a major trade piece. 

But it might be a pretty good backup catcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 25, 2011, 10:39:45 am
I always thought he should be a SS/closer, just like some are in college.

Whether or not he would have been able to get the ball over the plate is another question.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 25, 2011, 11:32:04 am
Granderson is a fine player, but a .269 career hitter.  I think there's a good chance Jackson will hit for a better average than that.  Granderson has a .341 career OBP, which I also think Jackson could surpass.

Jackson might never be the player Granderson is, too - very possible. But I think it's not an especially good comparison.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 25, 2011, 12:55:20 pm
Dunston never gave it serious consideration.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 25, 2011, 12:56:44 pm
Kirk Gibson is another name that's been mentioned as a possible comparison for Brett Jackson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 25, 2011, 01:03:43 pm
Gibson was overrated, but I'd take that.

I still think Jackson has a chance to be better than a .270 hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 25, 2011, 01:06:43 pm
Cubs' McNutt Flashes Power Arm In DL Return

By Ben Badler
April 25, 2011

 
ZEBULON, N.C.—Making his first start since coming off the disabled list, Cubs righthander Trey McNutt touched the mid-90s in an abbreviated return to the mound on Thursday for Double-A Tennessee.

McNutt, who left his first start in the third inning due to a blister on his right middle finger, said the blister didn't bother him Thursday. But the Cubs still limited him four innings at Carolina, where he allowed three runs (two earned) on eight hits with one walk and three strikeouts.

"I thought he had good stuff," Tennessee manager Brian Harper said. "I think he was a little rusty from missing that time. It was really only his second start because he missed a start, but overall I thought he threw some good fastballs and competed well and also threw some good breaking balls."

McNutt, 21, left some pitches up in the zone but he threw 45 of his 65 pitches for strikes, working off a mix of four- and two-seam fastballs from 90-95 mph. He used the four-seamer to go in on lefthanded hitters or away from righties, while running what at times was a lively two-seamer in on the hands of righthanded batters.

"I felt good getting my movement back today," said McNutt, the Cubs' top pitching prospect. "I wasn't going in there trying to blow it by guys. I was just trying to keep the ball low and make them hit it. That's what I'm trying to teach myself now, just to keep the ball low and don't worry about the velocity as much as the location."

Some scouts who have seen McNutt say he throws a low-80s power breaking ball with movement between a slider and a curveball. McNutt clarified that misconception, saying he has a curveball and a slider that are two distinct pitches, both ranging from around 80-85 mph. The pitches are difficult to distinguish at times because McNutt's curveball breaks down like a curve but also has the tilt and late bite of a slider.

While neither one is a wipeout pitch, McNutt got swings and misses at both. He said he chooses which breaking ball to use based on the one he thinks each hitter will have the most trouble handling.

"Everything feeds off the command of his fastball," Harper said. "When he gets his fastball over, then guys will chase the breaking ball, so it all feeds off the command of his fastball."

The final hitter McNutt faced was Fred Lewis, down on a rehab assignment with the Reds. McNutt got ahead 0-1 as Lewis watched a 94 mph fastball go by for strike one. Lewis fouled off a pair of 85 mph curves and another 94 mph fastball to hang in at 0-2.

"He's a good hitter," McNutt said. "I knew I couldn't make a mistake against him, so I was trying to stay away, away, and then I came in and just threw him a get-me-over curveball and he just kind of fouled it off. I threw him another one, he fouled it off."

Then McNutt came back with a pitch he barely used all night—an 85 mph changeup with solid sink that Lewis swung through for strike three.

"I knew he was looking something hard in, and then I just went away with that changeup and got him out front," McNutt said. "It was a good set-up to that hitter because I knew I really had to pitch to him because he's a good hitter."

McNutt only threw around six changeups on Thursday, and until that point it was a fairly nondescript offering. Many scouts have said McNutt's changeup is the piece of his arsenal that grades out the lowest, but McNutt's confidence in the pitch has grown significantly from a year ago.

"My changeup's one of my better pitches, actually," McNutt said. "If they took a pitch away from me, I'd rather it be my slider or my curve. I don't want it to be my changeup because I can throw a mid-90s fastball and then pull the string on them, come in there about 85, 86. That's a hard pitch to sit on.

"Just last year when I was in the Florida State League, I started learning how to throw one. That's when I really had to learn how to throw one, and that's what I did. I learned how to throw it and now it's my favorite pitch to throw."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 25, 2011, 01:43:34 pm
Thanks, JR. That's some nice detail, and it's also interesting to read what McNutt himself thinks about what he does and why/when he does it. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 25, 2011, 02:12:36 pm
Has Whitenack been called up to AA?  I read that on the Cubs farm report.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on April 25, 2011, 03:00:25 pm
McNutt only threw around six changeups on Thursday, and until that point it was a fairly nondescript offering. Many scouts have said McNutt's changeup is the piece of his arsenal that grades out the lowest, but McNutt's confidence in the pitch has grown significantly from a year ago.

"My changeup's one of my better pitches, actually," McNutt said. "If they took a pitch away from me, I'd rather it be my slider or my curve. I don't want it to be my changeup because I can throw a mid-90s fastball and then pull the string on them, come in there about 85, 86. That's a hard pitch to sit on.

"Just last year when I was in the Florida State League, I started learning how to throw one. That's when I really had to learn how to throw one, and that's what I did. I learned how to throw it and now it's my favorite pitch to throw."


I can't say enough how much I love this part of that article...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 25, 2011, 03:21:56 pm
Has Whitenack been called up to AA?  I read that on the Cubs farm report.

Very interesting..  My guess is that he would have made AA out of camp based on camp merit.  I assume that would mean one of the lefties would go out of the rotation. 

On McNutt, I also really liked liked the bit about the change. If he only just picked it up well into last summer, that would suggest that he's still in the improvement mode. 


I also like the multiple pitches, context dependent.  4-seamer and biting 2-seamer.  A curve that acts a little different from the slider.  On a given day I'm sure it varies what's working best, but if he's got five different pitches in his arsenal, that should provide a variety of mix-it-up stuff.  And even if they aren't all killer put-away pitches, a lot of the not-quite-the-same pitches I'd think would be good for contact outs. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 25, 2011, 03:37:31 pm
Whitenack promotion was listed in the comments so I don't know how reliable the source is.  They said he will start Wed.  We'll see I guess.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2011, 03:39:58 pm
I can't find any confirmation of Whitenack being promoted, and the Cubs rarely if ever promote any prospects this early in the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 25, 2011, 03:52:42 pm
Like I said, it was a comment not in the article itself which is why I asked.  We'll see.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 25, 2011, 07:27:18 pm
ArizonaPhil

Angel Guzman threw an 11-pitch 1-2-3 5th inning (6-3, P-5, 2-3) in relief of Davis, as the right-hander continues his rehab from 2010 shoulder surgery.






Mixing a 91 MPH fastball with a slow curve, a change-up, and a wipe-out hard slider, Matt Loosen (Cubs 2010 23rd round draft pick out of U. of Jacksonville) followed-up his eight-strikeout performance (over 2.2 IP) versus the EXST Rockies last week with four more strikeouts in two innings of work (40 pitches) today. The 22-year old 6'2 right-hander did struggle a bit with his control, however, throwing only 53% strikes and walking two.



The Cubs took the lead in the top of the 1st inning, as Marco Hernandez clubbed a two-run home run (his second EXST HR) over the RF fence, driving-in Jose Valdez who had reached base on a one-out opposite-field line-drive single to left. Hernandez has some pop when he hits left-handed, but is a "slap hitter" when batting from the right side. (A natural lefty swinger, Hernandez learned to switch-hit at AZ Instructs last fall).



Cubs 2010 #2 draft pick Reggie Golden clubbed a solo HR over the LF fence to lead-off the top of the 2nd, and the Cubs took a 4-0 lead after Dong-Yub Kim drew a walk, was moved up to 2nd base on a Doug Davis sac-bunt, and scored on a Wes Darvill line-drive RBI single to CF.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 25, 2011, 07:35:30 pm
"****-Yub Kim"

Freakin Asians giving their kids dirty names...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2011, 09:26:54 pm
Simpson: 4-5-2-2-1-3, HR

Szczur: 2-4, RBI, 2 BB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_25_peoafx_cliafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Vitters: 0-4, 3 K, ( 2 for last 24 )

Jackson: 0-4, BB, K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_25_tenaax_jaxaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 25, 2011, 09:36:13 pm
Is West Tenn running into better pitchers or are they just cooling off as a team?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2011, 10:21:16 pm
Yep, Montanez is definitely this year's Ross Gload/Rossevelt Brown:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_25_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 26, 2011, 05:24:02 am
We don't have a draft topic yet, so I'll put this blurb from BA's first draft projection here. This is Jim Callis making the pick.


While Chicago looks set at shortstop for a while with Starlin Castro, they have a gaping hole at second base. I'm taking Francisco Lindor here, with the idea that he nudges Castro over to second base in a few years. If not Lindor, the Cubs probably would opt for a righthander such as Dylan Bundy (Owasso, Okla., HS), Taylor Jungmann (Texas) or Matt Barnes (Connecticut).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 26, 2011, 05:31:19 am
And if you're wondering, here's a bit on the 3 of the players he mentions:

http://www.baseballrumormill.com/players/francisco-lindor/

http://www.baseballrumormill.com/players/taylor-jungmann/


http://www.baseballrumormill.com/players/matt-barnes/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 26, 2011, 06:10:25 am
I'm always in favor of taking best player available with the first pick but all things being equal I hope they go with pitching.  It seems like the system is woefully short of good arms.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 26, 2011, 06:29:36 am
Montanez probably needs to play some 1B just so he can replace Pena.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 26, 2011, 08:54:19 am
Prospect Report: Double-A Tennessee

Jackson stands out among Cubs prospects

By Ben Badler
April 26, 2011
 (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/email.gif)E-mail (?subject=Baseball America: Prospect%20Report%3A%20Double-A%20Tennessee&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseballamerica.com%2Fonline%2Fprospects%2Fprospect-bulletin%2F2011%2F2611626.html) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/print.gif)Print (http://bbf.createaforum.com/javascript:window.print())

ZEBULON, N.C.—The best offense in the Southern League is in Tennessee, where the Cubs' Double-A affiliate leads the league in nearly every major offensive category.

One of the keys to the Smokies' offense is Brett Jackson (http://www.baseballamerica.com/statistics/players/cards/64448), who in a recent five-game series at Carolina showed why he is the best prospect in the organization.

A first-round pick out of California in 2009, Jackson displayed a wide-ranging set of skills against the Mudcats. Jackson, 22, has good bat speed, shows aptitude for getting on base and drives the ball with authority across the diamond for line drives and home-run power. He's a good athlete who runs well, got good reads off the bat in center field and showed a strong arm.

At the plate, Jackson's success starts from his approach. Though he is prone to strikeouts, Jackson does a good job of recognizes balls and strikes and doesn't often expand his strike zone. That's one reason why he's tied for third in the Southern League with 13 walks, reached base at least once in his first 15 games and is off to a .350/.467/.633 start in 75 trips to the plate.

"I'm an aggressive hitter, but I take pride in my eye at the plate," said Jackson, who is 6-foot-2, 210 pounds. "I like getting on base, I like being a baserunner for a lineup with a lot of big guns, so that's given me the opportunity to score a lot of runs and be on base for some guys who can really swing the bat in our lineup. I do my best to get on base and sometimes I take my chances driving the ball and sometimes it finds some holes."

After primarily hitting third as a college sophomore, Jackson served as Cal's leadoff hitter his junior year and remains in that role for the Smokies. With his on-base skills it's a spot that suits him well.

"He has a good idea of the strike zone," Tennessee manager Brian Harper said. "He very rarely swings at bad pitches. He sees a lot of pitches, he can draw a walk. Brett's one of those kids, whatever role you put him in, he'll adjust to it and try to get better at it. You could put him in the three-hole just as easy as the one-hole, and he'll adjust to it. He has the intensity and the desire to do well."

Jackson has a good eye, speed (he ran out a ground ball to first base in 4.09 seconds) and lefthanded power to all fields. He fell a single short of the cycle on Wednesday, when he hit a first-pitch triple in the third inning and came back swinging in his next at-bat by taking a fastball over the right-center field fence on the first pitch he saw. The next night, Jackson went deep again, dropping the barrel on a fastball down on the outer half that he drove to the opposite for a home run.

Some scouts who saw Jackson in college worried that he wouldn't make enough contact in pro ball, but that hasn't slowed him yet. It is a valid concern, though, as Jackson will swing and miss a fair amount and has 14 whiffs this year. In his second trip to the plate last Tuesday, Jackson saw three pitches: A curveball in the dirt he swung at and missed, a fastball on the inside corner he swung through and another curveball he whiffed at for strike three.

With a stroke described in his 2009 draft report as using "an inward-turning, hand-pumping, leg-kicking, load-up-and-let-it-fly-swing," Jackson's swing has been evolving since he signed, with what Jackson refers to as a series of trial and error to find what works best for him.

"I can't even remember what I was thinking when I was in college," Jackson said. "I was trying to hit the ball hard, I'll tell you that much. There's certainly little things that I've focused on in my swing, but those are my own, and you try to make it a muscle memory thing so you can focus on the pitcher, focus on the ball and focus on the situation. That's the challenge of baseball, and I love it every day."

Vitters Waiting For Right Approach
When the Cubs made Josh Vitters (http://www.baseballamerica.com/statistics/players/cards/40461) the third overall pick out of high school in the 2007 draft, scouts saw great bat speed, outstanding feel for the barrel and an easy righthanded swing. Those ingredients are all still there for Vitters, 21, as he's shows a short swing and hands that can get to the ball in a hurry.

While it is a nice swing to have, one of scouts' criticisms of his game has been that he swings too often. In three full seasons between 2008-10, Vitters drew just 46 walks in 276 games, and he returned to Tennessee this year after hitting .223/.292/.383 in 63 games with the Smokies a year ago.

"It's just something that can always be improved on, I think," Vitters said. "Getting good pitches to hit is really one of the keys to hitting. You're just looking for something to handle and drive and drive in runs."

"It's just something that still is maturing," he added. "This year I'm starting to realize I don't have to hit a pitch just because it's a strike, especially early in the count. I'm just trying to look for a pitch I can drive, not just make contact with."

Vitters' ability to put the bat to the ball isn't in question. Off to a .246/.303/.475 start, Vitters has just six strikeouts in 66 trips to the plate—the lowest strikeout rate in the Southern League—yet his OBP has suffered as he's drawn just three walks.

"I feel that my hand-eye coordination, it's great, but it works against me sometimes," Vitters said. "I'll swing at pitches a little out of the zone and I'll make contact with it. It's definitely something I'm trying to work on, just finding an ideal pitch to hit early in the count and something I can really drive instead of just a pitch to make contact with."

His approach is still a work in progress. Against Carolina, Vitters had several at-bats that lasted just three or fewer pitches, including a string of three straight trips to the plate on Friday in which he dug himself into an 0-2 hole. A below-average runner at 6-foot-2, 200 pounds, Vitters will also have to bring along his defense, as some scouts who have seen him this year have questioned his ability to stick at the position, though he does have a strong arm.

"Josh is young and he's maturing a lot," Harper said. "I've been real impressed with his two-strike approach—he's hardly struck out at all this year. He's got as quick a bat as anybody. He can hit a fastball as good as anybody, and he's done a good job on offspeed pitches too. Josh is really maturing into a good hitter."

Flaherty A Man Of Many Gloves
At a park where it's 400 feet to center field with a wall nearly 25 feet high, it's rare to see anyone hit a home run to the middle of the park in Carolina, even in batting practice.

Ryan Flaherty (http://www.baseballamerica.com/statistics/players/cards/32206) hit just 10 home runs last year playing mostly in high Class A Daytona, but he accomplished the feat on Monday, crushing a fastball over the center field wall. With runners on first and second in the sixth inning, Flaherty whiffed at a curveball to start the at-bat, then worked his way to that 3-1 pitch by laying off a pair of breaking balls and a fastball outside the strike zone.

"I had a pretty good idea that he was probably going to try to throw something low and away and try to get me to roll over, but I stayed underneath it and stayed through it," Flaherty said. "I was fortunate enough that I got it up in the air and into center field. I had two thoughts to do there, which was to either try to pull the ball, but I was thinking he was going to throw away, so I tried to stay through the middle of the field."

For Flaherty, 24, that ability to use the middle of the field is one of the keys to his hitting. A high-waisted 6-foot-3, 220 pounds, Flaherty has a quick lefthanded bat and packs surprising power into his frame.

"He's a very good hitter," Harper said. "He's got tremendous power. Power that plays in the big leagues is power through the middle of the field, and he has that. He hit an opposite field home run the other day. Pull power in the minor leagues doesn't translate to the big leagues. Big league power is power through the middle of the field, and Ryan has shown that at times this year.

"If you look at the guys who hit a lot of home runs in the big leagues, it's guys who use the whole field. Guys who just pull home runs are not really power hitters. Ryan has shown that he can hit the ball out to left-center, straight away center, and that power translates to the big leagues."

Against Carolina, he expanded his strike zone on occasion but showed the ability to work deep counts, something he's done even before the Cubs made him a supplemental first-round pick out of Vanderbilt in 2008. Facing lefthander Travis Webb in the fourth inning on Friday, Flaherty worked his way to a 3-2 count, then went with a fastball on the outer half and took it the opposite way for a fly ball down the left field line that landed for a double.

"I don't like to think of myself as trying to be a home run hitter, but so far this year I've hit a couple early," Flaherty said. "I'm more just trying to stay in the middle of the field, not worrying about trying to hit home runs to the pull side. If I stay in the middle of the field, I have the confidence that I can get it out to that part of the field, so when I start getting in trouble I know it's when I start trying to pull the ball out of the yard. I'd rather stay in the middle with line drives, and if I try to do that, those balls will go out."

Flaherty is off to a hot start at the plate, hitting .328/.386/.623 in 18 games. One question scouts have about Flaherty, though, is where he'll play. A shortstop in college, Flaherty has played second base, third base, left field, right field and a bit of shortstop for the Smokies. He's a below-average runner and isn't a standout at any position, so he could become an offensive-oriented utilityman in the majors.

"The footwork's different at every position," Flaherty said. "When you're turning the double play at second base, that's completely different than even shortstop turning a double play. But once you get the basics of it, the best you can do is take a lot of ground balls in batting practice or fly balls if it's left field or right field. In the infield, it's just reps at every position. The more you play there, the more things happen that maybe hadn't happened before and you just try to learn from it and just keep getting better at each position because mostly the footwork's different at each position."

In his first full season with low Class A Peoria in 2009, Flaherty played mostly second base and shortstop, though he did get in 19 games at third base. Last year, Flaherty spent most of his time at third base, with some time at second as well.

"It was hard when I first started playing third because I wasn't used to fielding a ground ball like that," Flaherty said. "I was used to playing shortstop, playing second and you have time. The hardest thing at those positions is the double play, but at third base you've really got stay low and you've got to really pay attention to the ball because it's on you so fast, whereas at shortstop you have more time to react. You have to move more. At third you don't have to move as much, but that ball's going to come at you, and it's usually hit pretty hard. From that regard, the biggest adjustment playing third was trying to stay lower. You have to watch the ball the whole way because it's going to get on you quick."

Sometimes Harper will give Flaherty a heads up the day before to let him know what position he'll be playing the next day. Other times, it's only a few hours notice. Flaherty, though, said he enjoys the spontaneity of it and the challenge of playing so many positions. So where does Flaherty feel the most comfortable?

"For a while when I first started doing it, it was obviously shortstop because I played there the longest," Flaherty said. "Now I'm finally starting to feel that it doesn't matter where I'm playing—second, short, third, left, right, even at first—I feel as comfortable at each position, one from another, which is my ultimate goal, to be able to play every position and not have one I'm better or one stronger or weaker at."

Dominican Arms Boast Power Stuff
Dominican righthanders Rafael Dolis (http://www.baseballamerica.com/statistics/players/cards/84196) and Alberto Cabrera (http://www.baseballamerica.com/statistics/players/cards/84026), the Cubs' Nos. 7 and 9 prospects, threw against Carolina, though Dolis had to leave his start last Tuesday in the third inning when he tweaked his back after slipping on one of his pitches. It wasn't a serious injury, though, and Dolis returned to the mound yesterday.

In 2 1/3 innings at Carolina, Dolis (6-foot-4, 215 pounds) struck out three and didn't allow a hit or a run, though he did walk three batters. The 23-year-old ranged from 91-96 mph with his fastball, though he regularly sat in the higher end of that range from 94-96. A former shortstop, Dolis pitched true to his scouting report, throwing in the mid-90s but struggling to repeat his delivery and throw strikes as he became prone to overthrowing. Dolis also mixed in an inconsistent curveball, a mid-70s offering early in the count as a get-over pitch and a high-70s breaker he used once he got to two strikes.

On Friday, the 22-year-old Cabrera (6-foot-4, 210 pounds) pitched through a cool drizzle and allowed four runs in six innings, surrendering six hits and one walk while striking out five. Cabrera, whose younger brother Mauricio signed with the Braves for $400,000 last year on July 2, showed a power fastball that sat at 90-94 mph and touched 95.

Cabrera also threw an 81-86 mph slider that was solid at times but tended to get slurvy as well as an occasional 84-87 mph changeup. Cabrera leaned heavily on his slider toward the end of his outing, using the pitch almost exclusively against a handful of righthanded-hitting Mudcats who have had difficulties handling breaking stuff this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 26, 2011, 09:13:19 am
Thanks for the great report, JR.   Interesting comment about all-field power "translating" to the big leagues (vs just "pull power").   
The player reports were mostly glowing, but seemed generally objective...much to work on for our AA guys, not surprisingly...making the case for more seasoning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on April 26, 2011, 11:02:18 am
"It's just something that still is maturing," he added. "This year I'm starting to realize I don't have to hit a pitch just because it's a strike, especially early in the count. I'm just trying to look for a pitch I can drive, not just make contact with."

My question: Why the hell is he just now learning this?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on April 26, 2011, 11:03:43 am
Re: the Iowa/Memphis game...I can't believe they got that game in.

Also, if Brad Snyder played half his games in Autozone Park, he'd put up monster numbers. He always hits well here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 26, 2011, 06:52:44 pm
Jackson: 6-2/3 -4-1-1-1-1 ; 3-3, 2 2B


Gaub's good start comes to a crashing halt.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_26_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on April 26, 2011, 08:29:39 pm
I actually like the fact that someone can post a long article without having to break it up into 4 pieces.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 26, 2011, 08:52:08 pm
McNutt: 5-7-1-1-1-4


Flaherty: 3-5, 2B, 2 K




http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_26_tenaax_jaxaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb



Kirk: 6-4-1-1-0-6

Alcantara: 2-5, 2B, 4 RBI , ( 6-game hit-streak, 11-22, 10 RBI )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_26_peoafx_cliafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 26, 2011, 09:48:39 pm
Wow, surprised to see Jackson pitching that deep.  I'm not sure he lasted that long any game last year. 

Nice to see Kirk doing well.   I admit I'm pretty cautions with lefties in A-ball, though. 

Alcantara is starting to look awfully interesting. 

And gibbs has been going crazy, he even hit a double today.  His OBP is up to .520.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2011, 12:44:51 am
Trey McNutt

(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4076/4947701666_42ea5d25b1.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2011, 06:43:43 am
Hak-Ju Lee was a triple shy of the cycle last night; had 4 hits, a walk and a steal.

He's hit in all 9 games since returning from illness. He's currently at .447 with a 1.286 OPS.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 27, 2011, 06:45:11 am
Dunston was a classic case of being rushed to the bigs too early.  He should have been left in the minors until he figured out the strike zone.

If so, he might well still be there.

We have had this discussion before.  Many players are simply incapable of displaying "plate discipline."  Dunston certainly appeared to be such a player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 27, 2011, 07:26:46 am
Two nsbb posts on Jackson's game:

Quote
I just got back from the Iowa game. I caught the first 4 innings. Jay Jackson looked pretty good. Mostly fastball/slider. Some of those sliders could've been changeups i guess. Fast ball was between 84-89, I didn't notice it touch 90 once. His offspead pitch was 78/79. I would say the gun was possibly slow but some guy named Lance Lynn for the Redbirds hit 90 a couple of times. He had only given up 1 hit when i left but that Redbirds line-up is pretty awful. Freddy Bynum is hitting clean-up for god's sake.

Another guy added: 

Quote
I heard second hand from a friend in Memphis that the radio commentators said Jackson was throwing 91-93 mph throughout his outing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 27, 2011, 08:57:02 am
Jackson was also 3-3 with a double.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 27, 2011, 11:18:39 am
Hak-Ju Lee was a triple shy of the cycle last night; had 4 hits, a walk and a steal.

He's hit in all 9 games since returning from illness. He's currently at .447 with a 1.286 OPS.



Just STFU, dammit.  This deal is going to be the gift that keeps on taking.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 27, 2011, 11:18:57 am
S T F U is censored???
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 27, 2011, 11:50:51 am
What's the point of having a user control that let's you ignore the censor when you can't ignore the censor?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 27, 2011, 12:34:00 pm
That's about the only thing I'm not liking about this place so far.  The censor on here is pretty **** ridiculous.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 27, 2011, 01:31:45 pm
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_04_27_tenaax_jaxaax_1

Apparently Whitenack did indeed get promoted to Tennessee, since he's pitching this afternoon.  One-hit shutout through the first five innings as I write.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 27, 2011, 01:45:58 pm
Whitenack is looking like a real find.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 27, 2011, 01:48:32 pm
They are skipping Russell's next start and moving Whitenack up to the bigs in 10 days after two AA starts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 27, 2011, 01:49:34 pm
I doubt he could do any worse than Russell.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2011, 03:44:46 pm
Whitenack: 6-3-0-0-0-3, 9-2 GO/FO


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_27_tenaax_jaxaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 27, 2011, 04:02:37 pm
I doubt he could do any worse than Russell.

Heh, not much doubt there.  James Russell has allowed 17 HR in 62 big-league innings. 

Astonishing.  I've worried about guys like Garza and Lilly and Jay Jackson because they are too HR-prone.  But Russell is absolutely out of this world. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 27, 2011, 04:09:14 pm
I'm happy for Whitenack, but I think a reality check is in order.  He's still basically a high-80s fastball guy, isn't he?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on April 27, 2011, 04:19:12 pm
I'm happy for Whitenack, but I think a reality check is in order.  He's still basically a high-80s fastball guy, isn't he?

I don't know how reliable it is, but I found this report on Whitenack:

Now the Cubs may be molding yet another unsung prospect into a power arm worthy of a look. Robert Whitenack went 24 rounds ahead of McNutt in 2009, but was equally unheralded until last week. That was when he fanned 12 batters in a High-A game, walking none and allowing just one hit over six innings. He followed that up with six more innings against the same team (the Clearwater Threshers, a well-stocked Phillies affiliate) Sunday, in which he whiffed three, walked one and allowed only one unearned run.

Since he was drafted, Whitenack, 22, has ticked his fastball from the low-90s to 94-95, and all of his pitches have good downward plane from a long-levered delivery.


http://matthewtrueblood.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/chicago-cubs-minor-leagues-watch-chris-archer-trey-mcnutt-robert-whitenack/ (http://matthewtrueblood.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/chicago-cubs-minor-leagues-watch-chris-archer-trey-mcnutt-robert-whitenack/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 27, 2011, 04:21:58 pm
Heh, not much doubt there.  James Russell has allowed 17 HR in 62 big-league innings. 

I have never understood why James Russell's spot on the Cubs has been so secure the last couple of years.  His minor league numbers have mostly been bad, and he's been a batting practice pitcher in the big leagues since the second half of last year.  Yet he keeps getting chances and is almost always on the short list of guys to fill in the rotation every time there's an injury there. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2011, 04:33:47 pm
Baseball Prospectus blurb on Whitenack from a couple weeks ago:

six-foot-five righty has solid velocity and plenty of deception.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 27, 2011, 05:15:02 pm
Whitenack will be up by mid-May.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 27, 2011, 05:17:20 pm
I have never understood why James Russell's spot on the Cubs has been so secure the last couple of years.  His minor league numbers have mostly been bad, and he's been a batting practice pitcher in the big leagues since the second half of last year.  Yet he keeps getting chances and is almost always on the short list of guys to fill in the rotation every time there's an injury there. 

This smells of old boy loyalties.  Nepotism.  Anything but solid baseball skill evaluation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 27, 2011, 06:13:25 pm
Casey Coleman is now scheduled to pitch Sunday in Arizona (when James Russell's spot at  in the rotation would next come up).  We'll see who pitches Monday night in LA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 27, 2011, 06:19:50 pm
They are skipping Russell's next start and moving Whitenack up to the bigs in 10 days after two AA starts.

I repeat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 27, 2011, 06:53:34 pm
Would it really be all that bad if they called up McNutt for a few starts until Wells is ready?  What's the worst he could do?  A run an inning like Russell is currently doing? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 27, 2011, 07:55:49 pm
There's no logic in using James Russell as a starter.

There never has been.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2011, 08:28:18 pm
Hak-Ju Lee 2-4 today. Sitting at .452



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2011, 09:22:48 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2B, BB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_04_27_peoafx_cliafx_1

Iowa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2011, 09:45:59 pm
Ha: 2-5, RBI, SB, BB, (Assist: threw out go-ahead runner at the plate in 9th)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_27_tbyafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 27, 2011, 09:59:20 pm
Ha is putting up some great numbers.

With the moderate power, speed, solid discipline and good defense he's showing, I wonder if his ceiling might be something of a Shin Soo Choo. I'll take that any day of the week - I love me some Choo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on April 27, 2011, 10:20:54 pm
That was Ha's first BB of the season.  81 ABs to get it. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 27, 2011, 10:24:38 pm
Pitchers are finally learning to pitch around Ha.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 27, 2011, 11:35:09 pm
Bah! I thought I remembered seeing all kinds of BB's from him in the lines posted here. Oh well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 28, 2011, 09:18:30 am
Bah?  Is that a spanish swear word?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 28, 2011, 09:45:34 am
Guyer is hitting around .350 in AAA 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 28, 2011, 12:03:55 pm
I don't know how reliable it is, but I found this report on Whitenack:

...Since he was drafted, Whitenack, 22, has ticked his fastball from the low-90s to 94-95, and all of his pitches have good downward plane from a long-levered delivery.

http://matthewtrueblood.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/chicago-cubs-minor-leagues-watch-chris-archer-trey-mcnutt-robert-whitenack/ (http://matthewtrueblood.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/chicago-cubs-minor-leagues-watch-chris-archer-trey-mcnutt-robert-whitenack/)
Baseball Prospectus blurb on Whitenack from a couple weeks ago:

six-foot-five righty has solid velocity and plenty of deception.


Thanks for the scouting info, Tom and Chris.  Like Deeg, I haven't gotten much detail on Whitenack, so the question of whether he's 88 or 95 is pretty significant.  If he's solid/95, that's pretty encouraging.  And of course would help to explain how he's managed his astonishing 0.5 WHIP and his 28K/1BB/14H/0HR splits thus far. 

Obviously the reliability of the 94-95 stuff is iffy.  But that doesn't mean that much, most guys who work at 89-92 will have touched 94-95 on occasion.  So it may both be true that he's touched 94-95 and true that he's mostly around 90 if you actually watch the guy, I don't know.  And a nicely located 89-92 sinker is obviously a much better pitch than a straight 92-95 4-seamer. 

The "deception" comment is interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 28, 2011, 12:59:12 pm
Szczur has gotten 7 hits and 3 walks over his last three games. 

He's reached 1B twenty times thus far by walk or single, but thus far has attempted only one stolen base.  Either his leg still isn't close to 100%, or else stealing bases just isn't something he's interested in or qualified for at this stage of his career. 

Yesterday was only the second day since the 18th that Ruby silva has played.  4 K's yesterday, 14K/2BB overall looks pretty bad.  I'd kind of hoped that a guy who'd played in Cuba's highest league would find A- pitching pretty easy, and when he started fast I was pretty pumped.  We'll see how he shakes out as he settles back in and finds his equilibrium.  I imagine some of this Peoria weather might be a bit of an adjustment, too.  Despite his alleged great speed as his best tool, he has only 2 SB and 2 CS.  So if he doesn't steal, and has a bad K/BB ratio, I think he's going to eventually need to hit quite a few HR's to make things work offensively. 

Dallas Beeler has allowed an earned run in only one of his three appearances.  For a very late draft pick, I'd have to say his start is very encouraging.  Although I don't really know much about what he's got, other than than he's big and the Cubs supposedly liked his arm, low 90's kind of guy I assume with potential for more. 

I wonder what the deal was with him last night, he pitched three perfect innings and got taken out.  Rain delay?  Injury?  That's just all the piggy-back plan allowed, for some reason?  He'd pitched five in his previous outings and four in his opener, so facing 9 batters couldn't have exhausted his pitch count unless there are some issues we don't know about.  I'm kind of looking forward to hearing what kind of stuff he has. 

Rhee's little blister must be not so little, I don't think.  He's been out for 19 days.  I'm kind of wondering because JR's guy Ebinger has been even worse than you'd expect for a late-drafted almost 23-year-old Lambuth man.  So with Whitenack moved up, I'd like to see Ebinger replaced in Daytona's rotation.  Rhee could be a guy, or maybe Beeler or Kirk or Lopez moved up from Peoria. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 28, 2011, 01:22:48 pm
Bruce Miles talks to Oneri Fleita about Rob Whitenack and other minor leaguers

http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/5574
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 28, 2011, 03:52:23 pm
Good to see the manager benching Lake for loafing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 28, 2011, 03:59:54 pm
That was Ha's first BB of the season.  81 ABs to get it. 

It's amazing Brett Jackson ever learned how to take a walk playing in this organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 28, 2011, 04:29:11 pm
Quote from: Bruce Miles' blog
Also at Tennessee last night, Brett Jackson (.324) was 1-for-4 with an outfield assist. Josh Vitters (.258) was 1-for-4. Both Jackson and Vitters have cooled of late. "They've had a lot of line-drive outs," Fleita said. "But both are having good at-bats. There are times when Vitters is too patient at the plate."

Surely that "Vitters is too patient at the plate" comment is a typo and should actually be about Jackson.  I can't imagine anyone would ever classify Vitters that way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 28, 2011, 04:43:00 pm
Yeah, I thought that comment was pretty ludicrous, if he actually meant it for Vitters.  Also glad to hear that dopey Lake got benched for slacking. 

The info on Whitenack being stronger and 91-94 sure is interesting, and helps to explain why  a very hittable strike thrower is now turned into a guy where guys can hardly get the ball out of the infield. 

I read that Ha has thrown out 6 baserunners already this month.  That's pretty amazing.  Several at the plate.  I don't know how to calculate, but gunning a guy at the plate is and taking away a run while creating is out is kind of like the flip of hitting a solo HR, and gunning guys at 2nd or 3rd is like the value of getting a double or triple. 

Kind of fun.  Maybe I'm premature, but I'd have to say that Ha and whitenack have clearly jumped into my top 10.  Lake has fallen well out, as have Raley and Golden who'd sneaked into my top 10 after the Garza trade gutted my list. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2011, 05:00:28 pm
BA has some piece up about the Cubs not wanting to rush their young arms. It's only available to subscribers though...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2011, 05:02:45 pm
Kevin Goldstein must not have gotten Fleita's memo on Whitenack:


Whitenack entered the year with very little fanfare, but he's generating attention after striking out 25 while walking just one in four Florida State League starts and then delivering six shutout innings in his Double-A debut yesterday. An eighth-round pick in 2009 who had an ERA near five for Low-A Peoria last year, Whitenack's doesn't throw especially hard, but his average-velocity fastball plays up due to the downhill plane created by his 6-foot-5 frame as well as the heavy sink he gets on the pitch, while he's always he a good slow curveball to go with it. His ceiling is as a back-end starter, but that's a massive improvement from where he was heading into the year as little more than an organizational arm.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on April 28, 2011, 05:06:26 pm
Here's the BA piece (by Phil Rogers--so don't get excited):

CHICAGO—Midway through spring training, the Cubs seemed set for starting pitching. But a chain reaction triggered by Randy Wells and Andrew Cashner winning the last two spots in the big league rotation left general manager Jim Hendry searching for starters in April.

The Cubs found themselves short-handed when Wells (strained forearm) and Cashner (strained rotator cuff) went on the disabled list after making one start apiece. They signed 37-year-old Ramon Ortiz and 35-year-old Doug Davis to minor league contracts in the aftermath of those events. "We're doing what you should do—accumulating some guys down in the system," Hendry said.

Hendry hopes that Ortiz and Davis can join Casey Coleman in giving Mike Quade enough starting pitching depth so that he can avoid shifting Jeff Samardzija and Chris Carpenter from bullpen roles and damaging the development of Trey McNutt, Rafael Dolis and Alberto Cabrera, who opened the season with Double-A Tennessee.

"We've got some very good prospects at Double-A we don't want to rush along," Hendry said.

McNutt created buzz in 2010, and Hendry has mentioned both McNutt and Cabrera as guys who could help the Cubs in the second half of this season. Dolis, whom Hendry did not specifically mention in that reference, is advancing in lockstep with Cabrera.

Both Dolis and Cabrera are powerfully built righthanders from the Dominican Republic. They were signed by signed by Jose Serra, whose list of recent credits is topped by Starlin Castro, and have advanced slowly through the farm system.

Dolis, signed as a 16-year-old in 2004, has became a highly regarded prospect since missing 2008 after Tommy John surgery. Originally signed as a shortstop, he showcased a fastball that touched 101 mph in instructional league after the 2009 season, and last year split time between high Class A Daytona and Tennessee. He had a 1.80 ERA after his first two starts in 2011, striking out 10 in 10 innings.

Cabrera, signed in 2005, battled shoulder and elbow injuries in 2008 and 2009, when he was assigned to low Class A Peoria, but followed Dolis in making the jump from Daytona to Tennessee last season. He pitches in the mid-90s, and like Dolis, continues working to improve his secondary pitches and his command. He had a 4.50 ERA in his first two starts of 2011, striking out 10 in 10 innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2011, 08:18:26 pm
Thanks Reb.

On another note, H-J Lee had two more hits, a walk, a steal and an RBI tonite.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2011, 09:15:38 pm
Jackson: 1-4, 2B, 2 SB, BB, 3 K, E

Vitters: 0-4, E

Cabrera: 5-7-5-2-2-7


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_28_cmcaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Ha: 2-4, RBI, 2 SB, K

Rhoderick: 1-2/3 -0-0-0-0-3 , ( 14-1/3 IP, 7 H, 19 K )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_28_tbyafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Carpenter: 2-2-1-1-1-1, 2 HB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_28_iowaaa_omaaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_28_peoafx_belafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2011, 06:18:06 pm
Two former Cubs make this week's Hot Sheet.

One current Cub makes the Not-So-Hot list.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2011/2611661.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2011, 09:09:00 pm
Rosscup: 6-2-1-1-4-8


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_29_tbyafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Alcantara: 2-4, E, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_29_peoafx_belafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2011, 09:41:33 pm
Flaherty: 2-5, HR, 2 RBI, K

Vitters: 1-4, 2B, BB, 2 E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_29_cmcaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2011, 09:47:31 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_04_29_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 29, 2011, 11:27:54 pm
Clevenger and Flaherty, the beat goes on.  I wonder how unacceptable Flaherty's defense would be at 2B?   He's got one error overall.  Range may be awful, but at least he's not messing up what he can reach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 30, 2011, 08:40:25 am
Clevenger would make a great replacement for Hill.  I am told that the pitchers love to pitch to him.  And now he is even hitting with a little power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on April 30, 2011, 10:17:41 am
That describes a pretty good chunk of the population though Dave
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 30, 2011, 12:48:09 pm
Give Koyie some love.  He has more homers than Pena.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2011, 01:12:40 pm
Ouch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 30, 2011, 02:21:10 pm
Give Koyie some love.  He has more homers than Pena.
Can Koyie play 1B?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 30, 2011, 05:16:09 pm
Simpson: 4-2/3 -7-4-4-1-5, 2 HR

Gibbs: 2-5, HR, 3 RBI, BB

Szczur: 2-5, 2B, SB, BB, K






http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_30_peoafx_belafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 30, 2011, 08:33:08 pm

Flaherty: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB, 2 K, E

Dolis (relief): 2-1-4-0-4-1, 2 WP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_30_cmcaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb



Struck: 5-5-2-2-2-6

Ha: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, BB, K, CS

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_30_dunafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 30, 2011, 11:33:58 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_04_30_iowaaa_omaaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on May 01, 2011, 07:15:21 am
I'm pleasantly surprised by Ha's power so far.  Hopefully he can keep it up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 01, 2011, 07:59:15 am
The scouts have always projected that he would grow into power.

Sooner or later, they had to be right.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 01, 2011, 10:17:02 am
Thomas Diamond is not the answer. Era over 8 at Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 01, 2011, 12:17:49 pm
Was at the daytona game last night. Ha crushed that HR and really showed a good eye on his walk. He made a couple of nice running catches in CF as well. The kid looks good. Not sure the speed gun was working...never saw Struck throw harder than 79.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 01, 2011, 12:24:44 pm
79?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 01, 2011, 12:25:53 pm
Yeah...I think the gun was malfunctioning. The highest I saw from any pitcher on either side was 83
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2011, 04:24:14 pm
McNutt: 6-4-2-2-1-4

Jackson: 0-4, K, (6 for last 39)

Vitters: 0-4, (4 for last 32)




http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_01_cmcaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2011, 05:16:20 pm
Kirk: 5-2/3 -3-2-2-2-7


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_01_peoafx_burafx_1


Jackson: 4-1/3 -5-4-4-3-3

Gaub: 1-1-0-0-0-2 , ( 11-1/3 IP, 24 K )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_01_iowaaa_omaaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 01, 2011, 05:18:24 pm
The scouts have always projected that he would grow into power.

Sooner or later, they had to be right.

The scouts that BA talked to this winter did not at all project Ha to grow into power. 

"He's more of a....15-homer-max type of guy than a slugger," wrote Jim Callis this winter.   

We'll see.  I don't expect that scouts were spending all their time on a slender low-profile Korean outfielder who started last year in short-season.  So I'm not sure the scouts gave all that much thought to Ha's power potential, or that BA spend all that much time consulting dozens of scouts about Ha, who wasn't close to their top-20 in the Midwest league last year.  Plus, as I always say, HR is as much about hitting the ball square as being physically strong.  And when guys get physically stronger, they can sometimes adjust their stroke a bit to lift/loft the ball better for HR's, a stroke that might not be smart when you're too weak to hit HR's anyway. 

So I'm hopeful that with Keysbear seeing a crushed HR, and with 4 HR's already, and with Ha having a great gift for contact and hitting the ball square, I'm hopeful that he'll end up being a 30-HR max guy who's routinely 20+ than 15 max. 

But it's certainly not that he's been projected all along to be a HR slugger. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 01, 2011, 05:25:16 pm
A lot of pitchers with good starts today if not necessarily good finishes.  Kurcz with his best outing, 5 shutout innings.  McNutt five or six shutout before giving something up in the 7th.  Kirk really good for four before getting whacked in the 5th and 6th.  Jackson four good innings before getting crushed in the 5th. 

Interesting that Rhoderick, drafted last summer, got bumped up already to AA.  Rhoderick has 23K in 16 IP, including 4 in his 2-inning AA debut.  I wonder if they're semi-serious about him?  Or just a guy who youpush assuming he's not importnat enough to mind if he gets bashed and is useful roster fill? 

Anyway, if he's good in AA, it will be fun to keep an eye on him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2011, 06:16:45 pm
Daytona GM 1:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_01_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2011, 06:57:23 pm
First draft projection from David Rawnsley:


Quote
9. CHICAGO CUBS

Josh Bell, of, Dallas Jesuit HS

It’s a given that veteran Cubs scouting director Tim Wilken will go off the board for a player he likes, in any round. He did it frequently with success in Toronto and pulled the surprise of the first round last year by taking diminutive, but hard-throwing righthander Hayden Simpson from an NCAA Division II school. The Cubs might have gone for a smooth-fielding shortstop like Lindor in this spot, if not for the fact that the Cubs best big-league player is 21-year-old shortstop Starlin Castro. Bell might remind Wilken of one of his Blue Jays surprise first-rounders, Vernon Wells, who was also a Dallas-area high-school outfielder when Toronto picked him fifth overall in 1997.




http://www.perfectgame.org/Articles/View.aspx?article=5563
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2011, 07:06:29 pm
Trying to figure out who Wilken might take in the first round is wasted effort.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 01, 2011, 07:10:33 pm
Trying to figure out who Wilken might take in the first round is wasted effort.
Kind of like watching the 2011 Cubs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2011, 08:39:31 pm
Rhee returns: 2-2-/3 -2-1-0-1-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_01_dunafa_dbcafa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2011, 01:35:30 am
Dolis in relief is apparently a new role as ordered by Cubs brass. Seems like another poor decision.

Also, McNutt left Sunday's game with another blister issue.

Lastly, the Daytona Beach Journal confirms that Rhee's injury was indeed a blister problem.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 02, 2011, 08:55:48 am
Some of this is new, some is not

News and Notes
 The Iowa Cubs released RHP Jake Muyco. Right Handed pitcher Robert Whitenack was assigned to Tennessee from the Daytona Cubs. The Tennessee Smokies released LHP Luke Sommer.


Tennessee placed RHP David Cales on the 7-Day disabled list. Right Handed pitcher Kevin Rhoderick was assigned to Tennessee from Daytona Cubs. RHP Eduardo Figueroa and RHP Juan Serrano were assigned to the Daytona Cubs from the Peoria Chiefs.

The Daytona Cubs activated OF Nelson Perez and RHP Dae-Eun Rhee from the 7-Day disabled list. Daytona placed C Mario Mercedes on the 7-Day disabled list. Peoria Chiefs activated RHP Marcus Hatley from the 7-Day disabled list. LHP Casey Harman was assigned to the Peoria Chiefs from Cubs Extended Spring Training. Catcher Chad Noble was assigned to AZL Cubs from Peoria Chiefs.

Matt Szczur, a former wide receiver at Villanova, was not drafted in this week's NFL Draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2011, 04:09:45 pm
Vitters: 2-4, 2B, HR, 2 RBI

Whitenack: 5-7-4-4-2-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_02_cmcaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 02, 2011, 04:11:49 pm
Vitters must have been on a real nosedive before today.  Didn't realize he was now only hitting .241.
 
At least he's now learned he doesn't have to swing at every strike they throw him, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2011, 04:20:22 pm
Quote
At least he's now learned he doesn't have to swing at every strike they throw him, though.

Considering he has 1 walk over his last 50 at-bats, I'm starting to doubt that report.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 02, 2011, 06:23:25 pm
Maybe that means he's taking pitches down the middle and swinging at pitches off the plate, only to ground weakly to shortstop.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2011, 09:09:19 pm

Daytona:


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_02_dunafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


I'm assuming Coello is not a call-up option.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_02_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2011, 09:45:30 pm
Don't say the parent club doesn't teach its affiliates anything.

Peoria loses in the 9th when a runner scores from 2nd on a flyout as the return throw hits the runner tagging up.


Szczur: 1-3, 3 SB,  2 BB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_02_peoafx_burafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 02, 2011, 09:48:56 pm
Was Szczur stealing against Cubs pitching?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 02, 2011, 09:57:56 pm
ArizonaPhil

Reggie Golden blasted a 400-ft+ three-run home run over the left-centerfield fence and Dong-Yub Kim **** at two-run shot over the LF fence to lead the EXST Cubs to a 9-3 victory over the EXST Diamondbacks this morning at Fitch Park Field #2 in Mesa.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 02, 2011, 10:01:20 pm
The current box shows Szczur as actually 0-3. 

I'm glad to see him stealing a little bit.  For a guy who was scouted primarily for his speed, it's seemed odd that he didn't steal in college, he didn't steal in short season, and he stole one base in his first 15 games this year. 

He'd be a lot more interesting if he was a prolific volume base-stealer, and his singles really did routinely turn into doubles, rather than twice a month. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 03, 2011, 10:54:44 am
Logan Watkins has had a really wretched start to the season.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=543894
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 03, 2011, 02:02:05 pm
The problem is that he's a better defensive 2B than Cerda.  So Watkins plays 2B, while Cerda (whose OBP and slugging are each higher than Watkins OPS...)  plays 3b.  Even though Cerda doesn't appear to be very good defensively at 3B, and is unlikely to ever hit with the power a big-league 3B normally is expected to show. 

It may be that Cerda would be too lousy defensively to ever play big-league 2B, but the Peoria announcer didn't think so, and sometimes guys are better at 2nd than 3rd for whatever reasons. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2011, 05:54:02 pm
Carpenter: 2-2-0-0-2-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_03_rreaaa_iowaaa_1


Su-Min Jung returns: 4-2-0-0-3-0, HB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_03_peoafx_burafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2011, 09:08:00 pm
Wallach: 6-4-1-1-2-9

Crawford: 4-5, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_03_dbcafa_tbyafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2011, 10:09:56 pm
Jackson: 1-4, BB, 3 K, Assist , ( 6 for last  39 with 15 K's )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_03_tenaax_mobaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 04, 2011, 05:20:34 pm
Jackson: 0-1, 3 BB, K, SB, E



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_04_tenaax_mobaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 04, 2011, 06:31:46 pm
CarrieMuskat 
Class A Daytona's Jae-Hoon Ha hit a 2-run HR in the 1st inning off Carlos Silva Wednesday. Silva is pitching for Tampa
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 04, 2011, 07:11:34 pm
Ha is tied for 5th in the FSL in HR's.  Two of the four guys ahead of him are Bour and Burgess.  He's in the top 15-20 in the FSL in both batting average and OPS. 

Rosscup is pitching for Daytona, and he'll probably get hammered next inning.  But what do we know about him, scouting-wise?  I don't recall getting much info when we traded for him.  At the time, of course, he was a late-round 22 year-old coming off of short-season ball.  Now he's a 22-year-old doing fine in FSL. 

He had good 41K/9BB/44IP ratio last year, and 27/6/40 the year before.  Good control, although it seems any lefty who can throw any kind of junk curveball and throw the ball over 83 mph can do that in short season. 

The real reason I'm interested, of course, is because he's never allowed a pro HR. 

Greathouse is off to a good start tonight too, 5K/0BB through 3.  He was top-30 on my ranking list, I think, so I'm hopeful he's getting locked in. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 04, 2011, 08:14:33 pm
Ceasar with two more hits today.  It is a concern to me that he only had 5 doubles, with no triples or homers at this point.  On the other hand, he has another stolen base today, and six for the season.  But most impressive to me is that he has 11 walks and only 9 strike outs to this point.  If he continues to develop, I can live with the lack of power, and there are still those who say that the power will come eventually.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 04, 2011, 08:47:57 pm
Greathouse: 7-1-0-0-3-8


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_04_cliafx_peoafx_1

Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_04_rreaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 04, 2011, 08:58:14 pm
Ha: 2-4, Hr, 4 RBI, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_04_dbcafa_tbyafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 05, 2011, 10:00:43 am
Draft Day memories . . .
 
Brett Jackson, of, Cubs.
1st round (31st), 2009, California

"I remember everything about the day I was drafted. It was a wonderfully perfect and terrible day all in itself, all wound up into one day. I spent it with my family, and the first round was a stressful time. It got down to 31, and I had a few teams that told me they were going to draft me and they didn't. I was obviously disappointed the Giants didn't draft me being my hometown team. I thought it was a longshot that they would, but there's still disappointment there. It got down to 31 and I was sitting in a small office room with my dad in our house. My family was down the hallway because, let's be honest, moms can stress you out. But I wanted to be alone with my dad. We were down in the office and 31 was up and it was the Cubs. I hadn't gotten a call from my agent, hadn't gotten a call from anyone. I always figured that whenever someone got drafted they knew they got drafted before it happened. There were about 15 seconds on the clock, no one had called and my agent had told me he'd call me when he knew what was going on. I wasn't even looking at the TV when my name was called. I had to do a double-take and look back at the TV. It was an outpour of emotion. My family came running down the hallway, and it was an exciting night. We had I think five or six Cal players drafted that day, so it was an exciting day for me college friends and I, Jeff Kobernus and Blake Smith, Dylan Thomason, a few guys, they came over to my house and we had a little grill in the back. It was a good relief and an exciting day for me. I couldn't be more proud to have been drafted by the Cubs. If there was a team that wasn't going to be the Giants, I'm glad it was Chicago. I was so proud to be able to join the tradition of the Cubs with a history so deep. That will be a day I'll never forget."
 
Trey McNutt, rhp, Cubs
32nd round, 2009, Shelton State (Ala.) CC

"I watched it the first two days. The Pirates called me in the eighth or ninth round and said they wanted to take me. They said, 'How much to sign you?' I was like, '$100,000.' They said that's fair, we'll be in touch, and then I never heard again from them that first day. Then I listened to it the second day and I didn't get a phone call, so I was like, 'Well, I guess I'm not getting drafted this year.' So after that day I just went signed up to start taking my summer classes and everything. I was working on a golf course that summer to make some money and then playing summer league ball on the weekend. But then that third day I was working on the golf course and I got a call from my mom and she said I'd been drafted. I was excited. It was the 32nd round, so I was like, oh crap, I'm not going to get any money, they haven't seen me pitch. They saw me out in Grand Junction in the College World Series and I was throwing 91-94 there. They wanted to see me pitch in that summer league I was playing in and they came and watched me a couple times, really liked me a lot. Pretty good money, $115,000 as a 32nd-rounder is a pretty good deal. So I just I took it, I left the golf course that day, went home, saw my family, got congratulations and everything. It was a big deal for me, I've always wanted to get to pro ball, get drafted, have that experience. It was a good time for me and they signed me two weeks later after they saw me pitch a couple times in a couple games. Went to Arizona, that's where my journey started and I'm still chasing a dream."

 
Josh Vitters, 3b, Cubs
1st round (3rd), 2007, Cypress (Calif.) HS

"I was just honored to be invited to the draft in the first place because it was the first ever televised draft. I think it was only me and a couple other guys, actually, Phillippe Aumont and Ross Detwiler. So it was awesome. It was just like basically a dream come true to be drafted into pro ball. It's always been a dream to be drafted out of high school, so it was exactly what I wanted and it was an amazing experience. My mom and my dad were there, my sister was too. My brother was in the middle of his season because he played at Fresno State so he couldn't attend, but we had a really good time. It was really surreal being on stage with my jersey up just being like you imagined how it would be. It was just an amazing experience. We went out to a nice dinner at a seafood restaurants right at the Orlando area. I had a little draft party after the fact when I got back home to California with some close friends and family, my high school coaches, a few other people came. It was a great time."



 
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/draft-dish/2011/2611673.html (http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/draft-dish/2011/2611673.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on May 05, 2011, 11:09:10 am
Cool stuff, thanks for posting that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 05, 2011, 12:10:43 pm
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_05_dbcafa_tbyafa_1

If Doug Davis was 20, we'd be all excited. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 05, 2011, 12:26:26 pm
Yawn...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 05, 2011, 12:42:20 pm
Quote from: Josh Vitters
"We went out to a nice dinner at a seafood restaurants right at the Orlando area."

Yeah, that's great.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 05, 2011, 02:08:27 pm
Lefties John Gaub and Scott Maine each pitched a scoreless inning to complete the victory last night.  Gaub struck out one in a perfect eighth and has now fanned 25 batters in 12.2 innings of work.  He leads all PCL relievers with a 17.76 strikeouts per nine innings ratio and is part of a group of nine pitchers tied for second in the league with nine holds.  Randy Flores of Tucson leads the league with five.  Maine finished the ninth to earn his third save against the Express and his fifth of the season.  Maine ranks third in the league in saves.  Jose Ceda of New Orleans is first with eight.  Maine has not allowed a run in 9.2 innings over his last seven appearances.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 05, 2011, 02:58:48 pm
Wasn't Jose Ceda once Cubs property?  If so, who did we get for him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 05, 2011, 03:00:46 pm
Wasn't Jose Ceda once Cubs property?  If so, who did we get for him?

Kevin Gregg
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on May 05, 2011, 03:57:26 pm
He leads all PCL relievers with a 17.76 strikeouts per nine innings ratio and is part of a group of nine pitchers tied for second in the league with nine holds.  Randy Flores of Tucson leads the league with five. 

Nice math...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 05, 2011, 06:26:46 pm
Wellemeyer got a start for Iowa. Yeah, Im excited too.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_05_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: weatherguy on May 05, 2011, 07:00:14 pm
Nice game for Lake. His BB/SO ratio needs a bit of work, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 05, 2011, 08:22:51 pm
ArizonaPhil


The Cubs 2009 Minor League Player of the Year after hitting 303/405/505 with a league-leading 43 doubles at Peoria, Burke had a dismal year at Daytona in 2010, hitting just 212/279/328 with 131 K. He came into Minor League Camp vying for a spot on the AA Tennessee Smokies roster, but after being sent back to Daytona toward the end of March, he agreed to make the move to pitcher.



And Burke looked VERY sharp today, striking out the first Rockies batter he faced (swinging), and then easily retiring the next two hitters on a fly out to LF and a 4-3 ground out.

My immediate impression of Burke as a pitcher is that with his breaking ball being as good as it is, he should at the very least have a future as a lefty relief specialist. But he also has a quality fastball (he was throwing in the mid-90’s in bullpen sessions last month), and so if he can develop the stamina and endurance needed to throw 100 pitches in a game, he could possibly be a rotation starter. He just turned 23 last month, so he still has time on his side.

Burke was a two-way player (OF/LHP) in HS, and while the Padres drafted him as an outfielder (he was traded to the Cubs in 2007 in the Michael Barrett deal), some scouts had him rated higher as a pitcher. So it’s not too surprising that he looks like he knows what he’s doing out on the mound. Also, he had what was considered the #1 OF arm in the Cubs organization prior to making the move back to pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 05, 2011, 10:14:51 pm
Jackson: 2-4, 2 2B, BB, RBI

LeMahieu: 3-5, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_05_tenaax_mobaax_1


Jackson drew a 2-out bases loaded walk in the 9th off a LHP to cut the lead to 1.

LeMahieu followed by lining a single to right after being down 0-2 to give Tenn the lead.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 05, 2011, 10:16:14 pm
Simpson: 4-2/3 -4-0-0-2-1 , 9-2 GO/FO


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_05_cliafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 06, 2011, 07:11:11 am
1/3 of Lemahieu's hits have been XBH.  Not powerful, but not necessarily bad for a 22-year-old who's still getting used to being stronger than he was. And not bad for a guy who gets quite a few hits.  10K/7BB, walks are low as always, but interesting. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 06, 2011, 07:19:43 am
Seven walks would be good for 5th on the major league team, ahead of Byrd (5), Castro (4), Barney (4), and Soriano (3).  He'd fit right in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 06, 2011, 08:32:39 am
7 walks for every 10 K's is not bad, and is pretty good if combined with even just a league average BA.  Obviously a small sample size, but that is a good ratio.  This year in the AL overall (using the AL to eliminate the distortion coming from pitchers hitting in the NL) the ratio for all hitters is roughly 1 walk for every 2 Ks, and last year for the full season in the AL it was not even that good -- 7367   walks to 15214 Ks, or .482 walks for every K.  .7 walks for every K is a good deal better.




Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 06, 2011, 08:35:46 am
He leads all PCL relievers with a 17.76 strikeouts per nine innings ratio and is part of a group of nine pitchers tied for second in the league with nine holds.

It would be even better math if he brings down his walk rate. Nine walks in 12 innings pitched is not good. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 06, 2011, 09:02:26 am
Seven walks would be good for 5th on the major league team, ahead of Byrd (5), Castro (4), Barney (4), and Soriano (3).  He'd fit right in.

I still wonder how Brett Jackson learned how to take a walk playing in this organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 06, 2011, 09:14:59 am
Theriot initially tried to work for walks.  Soto gets his share of walks.  Fontenot did.  Choi did.  Murton did.

That's about all I can think of in the last ten years who came up spending any time at all in the Cub system and having walks as any meaningful part of their offensive profile.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 06, 2011, 11:37:37 am
If HBP counts, the Cubs had a player who had that 100% of the time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 06, 2011, 04:50:56 pm
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_06_cliafx_peoafx_1

Kirk excellent again.  I wonder if he's got any potential, or this is just a Doug Davis/Phil Norton/brian McNichol/Micah Bowie/Joey Nation/Jon Cannon lefty picking on A-ball hitters? 

Little Caesar must have his leg feeling better, or else he's gotten some tips on how to steal.  A walk, two more singles, and two more SB today.  If your game is speed, it would be fun to have somebody who actually stole well and often.  Six SB in four games?  Lee got 32 last summer, and has 6 in 17 games this spring.  But I'm not sure I remember a 6-SB-in-4 games stretch since Dwayne Bacon.  And he probably never got on enough to steal that many. 

Silva started hot and I was pretty fired up, but he's really been struggling.  His OBP might fall below .300 tomorrow, and over his last ten games he's got 10 K's and a .382 OPS.  Not good.  I like to see the Cubs trying, but if he won't walk, can't steal, has no power, and plays outfield, that's not a good recipe if you're a K-king besides.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 06, 2011, 06:22:03 pm
Dave, thanks much for the Az Phil info, and the Burke report.  Man, it's a shame a guy with an arm like that wasted five years whiffing.  Imagine if we'd moved him to pitcher a couple of years ago. 

Hard to imagine going for more than a relief job when you've starting at age 23.  But a good arm with a good breaking ball for a lefty is great. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 06, 2011, 08:52:03 pm
Struck: 6-3-0-0-3-7

Rhee pitched well for 2 innings, then fell apart in the 9th.

Ha: 1-3, 2B, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_06_dbcafa_breafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 06, 2011, 09:37:44 pm
Jackson: 1-3, HR, RBI, BB

Vitters: 2-4

Rhoderick: 2-1-0-0-0-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_06_tenaax_mobaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 06, 2011, 10:35:45 pm
Jackson: 4-1/3 -8-5-5-3-2

Carpenter: 2-4-4-3-1-0, WP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_06_nozaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 06, 2011, 10:46:59 pm
Rhoderick.  I hadn't been very interested, but he's worth keeping an eye on now.  I'd wondered why he was promoted, whether it was just a short-term promotion for some reason. 

Struck is off to a solid start, too.  Had one bad game. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 06, 2011, 11:00:49 pm
Rhoderick is a guy who apparently has always had a big arm for the most part but not the best attitude.  I thought he was a fairly interesting guy when we drafted him anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 07, 2011, 02:16:31 pm
Rob Whitenack pitches tonight for the Smokies.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2011, 09:46:34 pm

Coello: 8-4-0-0-0-7

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_07_nozaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_07_kccafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2011, 09:49:43 pm
Whitenack: 6-1-1-1-3-3 , 12-1 GO/FO

Jackson: 1-4, BB, SB

LeMahieu: 2-4, SF, 3 RBI



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_07_tenaax_mobaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2011, 10:02:26 pm
Ha: 2-6, GS, 5 RBI, 2 K

Lake: 1-3, 2B, SF, 2 RBI, 2 BB ( first walks of the year )



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_07_dbcafa_breafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 07, 2011, 10:44:45 pm
Box score said Kurcz pitched relief.  I wonder who'll replace him, if that's correct?  They've already lost Whitenack. 

Maine at Iowa has been hot.  5 K's in his two innings. 

Justin Bour has been plugging along. I know he might not run any better than Mark Grace or Soto, but what other problems are prohibitive?  He's a big dude, he walks often and doesn't K a lot. 

My assumption is that he probably runs and plays 1B defense kind of like you'd expect for a 250-pound 25th round draft pick, and that "athlete" isn't what comes to mind when you watch him.  He hit for good average last year, but 12 HR at Peoria wasn't enough to live on.  But now he's got 7 in 29 FSL games, that's pretty good.  If he was able to sustain that volume/frequency of HR's, and something close to his 7HR/17K rate, I think he might be a guy whose power might make him interesting.  He's 22, so it's not like he's old or been repeating a bunch.  And he's LH, which might help. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 07, 2011, 10:45:58 pm
Anybody know what happened to Dallas Beeler.  Came out after three perfect innings in his last appearance, about 11 days ago or so.  I'm interested if he's healthy. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2011, 11:15:44 pm
Quote
Anybody know what happened to Dallas Beeler.

On the DL with an oblique injury.

Hicks is also out with a forearm issue.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 07, 2011, 11:55:05 pm
Thanks, Chris. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 08, 2011, 12:15:45 am
Whitenack threw only 84 pitches in six innings.  Are they just being extra cautious with him or is there some other reason?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on May 08, 2011, 07:26:46 am
Swapping Maine for Russell would sure make a lot of sense at this point.  Of course that means there is no way it happens.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 08, 2011, 08:29:13 am
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb

Maine has not been the master of consistency over his career, or over this early season.  But his seasonal numbers are good.  Over his last eight appearances he hasn't allowed a run.  And over his last 4 games, 6.1 innings, he's 10K/2BB/0hits. 

Not sure how often he's on his game, but it would seem that when he is, he's pretty good. 

Even were they to stick with Russell all year, Grabow's contract is expiring.  So there is a clear opportunity for an effective lefty reliever coming up this summer or next spring.  So I guess I'm not that concerned about when Maine gets called up.  I think the issue is simply for him to show he can sustain effectiveness.  I might almost just as soon let him stay at Iowa for a while and show that he can extend success there before disrupting him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 08, 2011, 09:25:21 am
What kind of foolish idea is that?  Leaving a guy in the minors to develop so he might be much more valuable later instead of bringing him up right now to add marginal improvement to a losing season?  Makes no sense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 08, 2011, 11:48:36 am
Remember the days when Jes was maintaining that it was better to bring up a kid to the majors, because he could learn more there than he could at AAA?

Ah, to be young again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 08, 2011, 01:10:34 pm
Dave, I have always said it depends on the player, what his developmental needs are and what his psychological makeup is.

Some need the time in the minors.  Many others don't.  In seasons like this, for teams like the 2011 Cubs who are not going anywhere, the question should be what will be best for the particular player's development, not what is best for the W/L record of a team which is at best mediocre, or which, as Hendry and Ricketts have said, has "being competitive" as its goal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 08, 2011, 04:48:26 pm
Perez: 2-5, HR, RBI, 3 K , ( 32 K in 78 AB )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_08_nozaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=


Daytona and Tennessee off.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 08, 2011, 07:34:50 pm
Jung: 6-1/3 -7-1-1-0-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_08_kccafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 08, 2011, 10:06:30 pm
With Jung, has he had arm issues?  Or does he have some contract which allows him to go to school in Korea or something?  It seems he's missed time every year.  Year one, he left early; homesick, or quitting, or school, or something.  Then last year he quit early, and I assumed/understood that to be sore shoulder.  Now he's starting late, so again I'm assuming slow comeback with the bad shoulder. 

Is that right?  Or not even very close? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 08, 2011, 10:22:07 pm
Jung is a headcase.  That guy Freud is too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 08, 2011, 10:39:31 pm
Jose Ceda in AAA for Marlins:

9 Sv's, 0.60 ERA, 15 IP, 9 H, 5 BB, 18 K
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 09, 2011, 01:13:42 pm
Doug Davis has been promoted to Iowa and will start Tuesday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 09, 2011, 01:54:03 pm
Ramon Ortiz may have pitched himself out of the running in Iowa today

Iowa Cubs
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Ortiz, Ra (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=150009) 6.013742403.89

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 09, 2011, 02:01:27 pm
That's better than a James Russell start.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 09, 2011, 04:29:51 pm
Just moving the discussion of the next 2-4 years over here, what can we realistically hope for in our 2012 or 2013 lineups?  I know Baseball America does their 4 years into the future lineups, but those are usually relying on a lot of prospects working out who usually don't.  And I'll probably be doing the same here, but if you're going to evaluate whether to keep Hendry based on how well we're set up for the future, we probably ought to look at that at least a little bit.

If we're looking at our offense, perhaps here's a view of what we might be seeing in 2012 and 2013 if things go relatively well with our farm.

C   Geovany Soto
1B  Albert Pujols/Prince Fielder  (You almost have to figure Hendry to go hard after one of the premeire first basemen this offseason.  Josh Vitters is probably our best near term hope for 1B, and that's starting to look like it won't happen.)
2B  Darwin Barney
SS  Starlin Castro
3B  D.J. LeMahieu/Ryan Flaherty/Marquez Smith from the farm or an external acquisition  (At this point, I'm ruling out Vitters.  He has an .860 fielding percentage at 3B this season, and he's not hitting.  Really the Cubs should go ahead and make the transition to 1B for him now and give his mind one less thing to think about.)
LF  Alfonso Soriano or external acquisition
CF  Brett Jackson
RF  Tyler Colvin

That's probably considering some relatively good luck from the farm that LeMahieu/Flaherty and Colvin become solid major league regulars and that Barney continues to look like he can have a Jeff Keppinger/Mark Grudzielanek type career.  However, we may also be looking at a real scenario where 1B, 3B, LF, RF, and maybe even 2B will have to be filled by outside players.  If the rosey farm projections hold up, though, a comparable MLB lineup might look like this . . .

C  Geovany Soto (We know what he is by now where we probably don't need a comp for him.)
1B  Albert Pujols/Prince Fielder
2B  Mark Grudzielanek
SS  Derek Jeter or Ryne Sandberg at SS (if things go unbelievably well) or Edgar Renteria
3B  Joe Randa/Mark DeRosa
LF  Alfonso Soriano or other unremarkable veteran slugger
CF  Curtis Granderson (high end) or Mark Kotsay (medium end)
RF  Jacques Jones

Is that a 95-100 win lineup there?  I'm not sure that's exactly the 1927 Yankees there, but that could win you some NL Central titles when the pitching is good.

And the pitching might be good . . .

SP  Matt Garza
SP  Andrew Cashner
SP  Trey McNutt  (That might have the potential to be a good top of the rotation if no one gets hurt . . . but that's a huge if.)
SP  Carlos Zambrano (or someone from the Alberto Cabrera, Jay Jackson, Chris Rusin collection if his arm gives out)
SP  Randy Wells

RP  Carlos Marmol
RP  Sean Marshall
RP  Marcos Mateo
RP  Chris Carpenter
RP  Scott Maine
RP  Rafael Dolis
RP  Jeff Samardzija
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 09, 2011, 04:31:49 pm
No way Colvin is an everyday player - for us or anyone else.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 09, 2011, 05:10:01 pm
I don't know if I see the Cubs being able to carry Soriano past this year.  Despite leading the league in homers, he's no better than an average offensive outfielder because his OBP is in the .270s.  And his defense is as bad as anyone in the league at this point.  He has no range anymore...he always looks like he's running through quicksand.  The Cubs may have to eat 80% of his contract, but they're going to have to find a way to dump him on an AL team this offseason (or before).

Hopefully they'll be able to do better than at least one of Barney and Colvin too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 09, 2011, 05:18:05 pm
Add Rob Whitenack to the pitching mix.  And Jae Hoon Ha to the outfield.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 09, 2011, 05:31:19 pm
Carpenter: 2-1-1-1-2-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_09_nozaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Greathouse: 6 IP, 0 R

Szczur: 2-4, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_09_kccafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 09, 2011, 05:49:14 pm
I'm starting to like Szczur as a stolen base threat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 09, 2011, 05:53:41 pm
Greathouse, 3 hits in his last two starts 13 innings. 

Szczur 8 SB in 7 games. 

I like the prospect of a guy who really steals, and who can both hit for average and take walks. Will be interesting to watch, but I'm liking the .400-OPB version who's stealing regularly.  A lot of guys can steal selectively, in certain matchups.  But don't really have the safety margin to just steal whenever they get on base, even if the pitcher is expecting it and even if the pitcher has a decent move or the catcher a decent arm.  So far so good. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 09, 2011, 05:57:22 pm
Daytona Cub RF Nelson Perez is the Florida State League player of the week

http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=CF&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=521656
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 09, 2011, 06:07:26 pm
In the discussion of front office personnel to keep, I want the entire place swept clean -- everyone must go.

I see no one in the current group that is irreplaceable.

One would think that executives from teams in smaller markets (Rays, Marlins, Rockies, Twins, etc.) would jump at a chance to work for the Cubs.

However, it remains to be seen if the Ricketts have the courage to make a bold move like that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 09, 2011, 06:37:58 pm
The Cubs desperately need to pop a dominant, middle-of-the-order hitter out of the farm system.  Lance Berkman in his prime.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 09, 2011, 06:50:09 pm
In the discussion of front office personnel to keep, I want the entire place swept clean -- everyone must go.

I see no one in the current group that is irreplaceable.

One would think that executives from teams in smaller markets (Rays, Marlins, Rockies, Twins, etc.) would jump at a chance to work for the Cubs.

However, it remains to be seen if the Ricketts have the courage to make a bold move like that.

Early evidence seems to be that Ricketts intends to run the club as a small-market team.  I'm not sure why any of those execs would expect to notice much difference if they went to Chicago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 09, 2011, 08:47:14 pm
LeMahieu: 3-5, 2B,  2 K, CS

Jackson 1-5, 3B, 3 RBI, 2 K

Cabrera: 6-5-2-2-3-3



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_09_hunaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 09, 2011, 09:47:44 pm
Daytona:


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_09_breafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 09, 2011, 10:34:04 pm
Justin Bour has 8HR/16BB/17K.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 09, 2011, 10:45:11 pm
Justin Bour and Jon Lieber separated at birth?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 10, 2011, 07:42:44 am
Bour is a lottery ticket.  Might as well push him to AA and see what happens.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 10, 2011, 11:40:08 am
Guys are always getting hot and cold (Flaherty, Jackson, Vitters, Cerda...)

I'd just as soon let Bour stay put, and ride things out for a while.  Power in FSL almost seems more meaningful than in Tennessee where everybody hits HR's.  And my recall is that while Daytona has a short LF corner, it's fairly deep in right.  So if he can produce a lot of HR in FSL, maybe that would mean something. 

But I guess a lot of Daytona guys hit a fair number of HR's.  I checked for fun and memories:  Dubois hit 20, Brendan Harris 13, Nic Jackson 19, Ryan Gripp 5, Harvey hit 20, Dopirak 16.  David Kelton hit 18 (at age 20), Choi 15 (in 93 games, he added 10 more at WTenn, at age 21).  Hey, maybe the Daytona HR king was really Ron Walker, he hit 24 at age 22!   

Looks like a fairly lengthy lists of guys who hit some daytona HR's and never turned into anything.  And all of those names were, at the time, much more highly regarded prospects than Bour. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 10, 2011, 11:59:10 am
Question:  For the McGwire/Sammy/Bonds era, big-league HR's were way up, juiced players or balls or both.  So comparing HR output now to 10 years ago doesn't work, it's a new era.

Is that likewise true for minors, or not at all?  Do the Bour/Ha HR's mean more because they don't have the juiced ball that Kelton, Jackson, and Ron Walker were hitting?   Or not really?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 10, 2011, 12:50:38 pm
Well, they didn't have steroid testing in the minors back then, either, did they?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on May 10, 2011, 01:45:35 pm
I'd still like to see Szczur hit a few more XBH's before I get too excited...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 10, 2011, 02:25:00 pm
Looking back on my post yesterday about our lineup over the next couple of years, I probably didn't get the point or question out there that I wanted to get across.

I think if the farm is a big part of the argument for why Hendry deserves to stay, like Rosenthal and a lot of Hendry defenders in the media say, it needs to make a big impact in 2012 or 2013.  We haven't had big expectations the last couple of years on the major league level, and pretty much for good reason.  As fans, though, I think it's fair to expect a real World Series contender in the very near future and not teams like this year where "if everything goes right, maybe we'll have a chance" type of team.  For one thing, by time 2012 or 2013 rolls around, we will have given Hendry a pretty nice 3-4 year grace period to get things turned around.  Secondly, Tim Wilken and our new scouting team have been in place since 2006.  2012 and 2013 are definitely years we should expect to start seeing a lot of what they're doing bearing some major fruit and start seeing the farm system being a real driving force of having a World Series contender. 

I probably got a little too caught up in posting those future lineups yesterday where I didn't really make the point I wanted to make, but just looking at our potential 2012-13 lineups, are we really looking at real World Series contenders the next couple of years?  I think it's an open question, and while I certainly wouldn't rule it out and actually think things could work out quite well, I'm not sure I'm really happy that it's even an open question one way or the other.  A lot is going to have to work out just right to be really good the next couple of years, and Hendry or whoever the new GM is has some big time major decisions to make this offseason.   
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 10, 2011, 02:30:47 pm
One thing is for sure is that Hendry should not be spearheading another 5 year rebuilding plan.  He shouldn't be given until Szczur, Simpson, Silva, and the 2010 international guys arrive until he finally gets things right, since it's still going to be a long time before we see any real impact from those guys (if they ever make a real impact). 
 
In some ways, from 2009 onward has been his chance to rebuild.  He's now had more or less three "free" years from 2009-11 to weed out a lot of the big contracts he handed out to get the 2007-08 teams into contention.  He's now had three free years to reorganize the farm under Wilken and to boost up our Latin American scouting.   
 
We may not have had high expectations recently, but I think it's fair to demand them here pretty soon.  Even if you sympathize with what Ken Rosenthal wrote yesterday, Hendry's leash still needs to be short even if he's given another year or two.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 10, 2011, 03:40:39 pm
Vitters with a total of 6 Ks in 108 ABs.  That's pretty amazing---works out to 33 Ks in 600 ABs.  Who does that anymore?

Somehow, he's hitting .241.  That's hard to do with so few Ks.  Well, BABIP:  .224.  There's the answer, I think.

So, pretty likely that Vitters is hitting in hard luck.   If Vitters' BABIP was .295, he would be batting .306 and his peripherals would be looking okay at this point.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 10, 2011, 03:48:45 pm
Gaub with 26 Ks in 13.2 IP at Iowa.  That's Marmol territory, no?

11 hits in those 13.2 IP. Not bad. Walks too high, but I wonder if Gaub is back on the verge of something useful.

And, with Maine doing pretty well, there could be some help on the way for the bullpen.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 10, 2011, 04:01:04 pm
Vitters with a total of 6 Ks in 108 ABs.  That's pretty amazing---works out to 33 Ks in 600 ABs.  Who does that anymore?

Somehow, he's hitting .241.  That's hard to do with so few Ks.  Well, BABIP:  .224.  There's the answer, I think.

So, pretty likely that Vitters is hitting in hard luck.   If Vitters' BABIP was .295, he would be batting .306 and his peripherals would be looking okay at this point.

I don't buy the hard luck argument, Reb.  Vitters has only 5 BB in those 108 ABs.  What that tells me is that he's still swinging at a bunch of bad pitches - he's just putting a lot of pitcher's pitches in play early in the count and not hitting them with authority.  Sure it holds his Ks down - but it also holds his BABIP down because he isn't waiting for something he can drive.

Vitters is a bust - accept it and move on.  If there was a taker for he or Colvin this offseason that would have given anything of value, Hendry is a fool not to have jumped at it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 10, 2011, 04:13:36 pm
I think at the very least, the Cubs need to go ahead and admit Vitters isn't the answer at 3B and get him moved over to LF or 1B.  It may even help his offense, since that will give him less to think about, and whatever gives a guy like Vitters less to think about is probably for the best.

It'd be a lot better if we can see if LeMahieu or Flaherty can be an anti-awful option at 3B if we decide to let Ramirez walk after this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 10, 2011, 04:23:01 pm
I don't see Vitters as a bust at this point.  The guy is at AA at age 21 and will be 21 almost the entire minor league season. 

6 Ks in 108 ABs is pretty remarkable.  He is age-advanced for his level.  His Ks are way down compared to his career.  Small sample size for sure at the early May point, but that jumps out at me, as does the extremely low BABIP in relation to the low Ks, which probably explains much of the low BA.

I am way more concerned with Vitters' errors and defense than with the traditional offensive numbers.  I'm not sure what his value will be as a 1B, especially if Cubs go hard after Fielder/Pujols this off-season.  He needs to develop as a 3B.

Can't see writing off a guy as a bust at age 21.  Your college first-round draft picks next month are 21. Way too early.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 10, 2011, 05:43:03 pm
As fans, though, I think it's fair to expect a real World Series contender in the very near future and not teams like this year where "if everything goes right, maybe we'll have a chance" type of team.

Why?

Look at what is on the major league roster, and what is in the minor league pipeline.

Not likely to have a World Series contender out of that.  And as long as fans have the "expectation" of it happening within a year or two, short-sighted, high risk moves will be made which actually reduce the chance of making it.

It would be nice to see a full rebuild, with ownership making clear that there was simply no chance of much of anything for the first two years, but hopefully sustained strength as a team beyond that.

I think at the very least, the Cubs need to go ahead and admit Vitters isn't the answer at 3B and get him moved over to LF or 1B.  It may even help his offense, since that will give him less to think about, and whatever gives a guy like Vitters less to think about is probably for the best.

It might just as likely to the opposite, as Vitters would have to learn how to play a new position.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 10, 2011, 06:42:22 pm
Jackson: 0-3, SB, 2 BB, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_10_hunaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 10, 2011, 06:46:09 pm
And as long as fans have the "expectation" of it happening within a year or two, short-sighted, high risk moves will be made which actually reduce the chance of making it.

If this is true, the entire baseball operations leadership should be fired instantly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 10, 2011, 07:25:13 pm
Right field in Daytona is 325 down the right field line, 385 in right-center and 400 to straight away center. More often than not when I've been there the wind has been blowing in from Right field off the water.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 10, 2011, 07:32:05 pm
Hayden Simpson left tonight's game after 1 inning. No reason given yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 10, 2011, 07:37:44 pm
Not good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 10, 2011, 08:19:20 pm
Ha: 2-4, 2B


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_10_dbcafa_jupafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 10, 2011, 08:50:52 pm
I actually like Hendry and am torn on that decision.  He is just such a good guy, I really pull for him to succeed, but eventually there needs to be results.  It does seem like the Cubs are finally doing a better job of developing a few hitters, but the pitching depth doesn't seem what it used to be.  However, I'll take that balance, as long as a balance makes it to the Majors.  I do not feel like we can win it all with what we have in the minors in the next few years, but i do think with 50 million to spend and what we have in the minors, we may have a shot, especially if we have a few starting pitchers such as Cashner and McNutt work out, and Wells continues to improve...that cheap pitching staff will let him concentrate on hitting.  And, i still think the bullpen can be a strength if the starting pitching is a strength, but, then again, not many teams have good middle relief anyway.

As long as Vitters keeps improving every year in some aspects, I don't see how you can write him off.  Obviously, he can put the bat on the ball, and he's only 21 for the whole year and in AA.  Give him some time.  I'm sure folks will question my sanity, but i actually still have high hopes for him.  If he can keep up something close to that K rate, i think he makes it to the show because of his natural hitting attributes.  His D, however, is another matter altogether but i'll take a Ryan Braun if he gets his bat straight.  They can find somewhere to play him.  I bet after a year in lf, he couldn't do any worse than Soriano.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 10, 2011, 10:21:38 pm
Still no word on Simpson.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_10_burafx_peoafx_1

Even Doug Davis couldn't  save the I-Cubs:


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_10_iowaaa_cspaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 10, 2011, 10:45:54 pm
I bet after a year in lf, he couldn't do any worse than Soriano.

I would happily take that bet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 10, 2011, 11:02:39 pm
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_10_dbcafa_jupafa_1 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_10_dbcafa_jupafa_1)

Big Bour 3/4 with another HR.  Finally bumps his average up over .300 and his OPS over 1.000.

Hak Lee is one of only two players in the FSL with a higher OPS.  Obviously Lee K's more than Bour and walks a lot less, but Lee's .493 BABIP is a lot higher than Bour's. 


I went back to see what the draft notes back when Bour was picked: 
Bour shows the ability to hit for average and power. He's a strapping 6-foot-4, 250 pounds and has drawn physical comparisons to Brett Wallace. Power will be his calling card, though he has the tools to be a good defensive first baseman.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 10, 2011, 11:15:34 pm
I would happily take that bet.

Lol. That statement was made with more the fact in mind of how horrid Soriano is than how good I think Vitters would be after a year. Not exactly a bet I would be comfortable to make either way.  Just figure of speech.  I woulda bet with the folks who kept swearing the bulls were get swept tho.  Came close to offering when bulls were down 0-1 just to see if those people really believed that stuff but figured it'd come off azzholey.   Lol
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 10, 2011, 11:26:05 pm
Simpson reportedly topped out at 87 prior to being removed after 22 pitches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 10, 2011, 11:36:32 pm
W. Castillo removed early in the Iowa game--perhaps right after the Soto injury?

Guessing that he's on the way to Chicago, pending evaluation of the Soto injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 11, 2011, 01:43:21 am
Hayden Simpson departed after working just one inning because of a tight shoulder.

“That’s all we know about it right now,” said Simpson, the Cubs first-round draft pick last June. “The shoulder was just tight, maybe I slept on it wrong. There’s no pain. All we know is that it was tight today. We’ll see how it feels (Wednesday).”

Simpson walked one and allowed two hits, but escaped the inning after throwing 22 pitches, 11 for strikes. He did not seem to have his typical low to mid 90s velocity.

“I saw it a little bit in the bullpen when he threw a few less pitches than usual,” catcher Micah Gibbs said. “When we talked before the game he asked to mix in more off-speed since his arm wasn’t up to par.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 11, 2011, 09:40:48 am
If this is true, the entire baseball operations leadership should be fired instantly.

But aren't you on record as advocating that everyone be fired regardless?  I mean, this is the worst franchise in the history of professional sports, isn't it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 11, 2011, 09:48:11 am
As long as Vitters keeps improving every year in some aspects, I don't see how you can write him off.  Obviously, he can put the bat on the ball, and he's only 21 for the whole year and in AA....  His D, however, is another matter altogether but i'll take a Ryan Braun if he gets his bat straight.  They can find somewhere to play him.

So what was Braun doing at age 21?

He posted a combined .352/1.025 (BA/OPS) in his first year as a pro in a season split between rookie and high A ball.  If Vitters can match those figures this year in AA, I think everyone here would be happy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 11, 2011, 09:51:02 am

I went back to see what the draft notes back when Bour was picked: 
Bour shows the ability to hit for average and power. He's a strapping 6-foot-4, 250 pounds and has drawn physical comparisons to Brett Wallace. Power will be his calling card, though he has the tools to be a good defensive first baseman.


Would be nice to see him emerge as a true prospect this season
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 11, 2011, 12:17:35 pm
jes, I didn't quite get the Bour evaluation at the time.  BA scouted that he could hit for average and power and projected to play good 1B.  They ranked him as the 7th best prospect in Virginia. 

If he was that good, why did he last till round 25?  Two thoughts:
1.  Scouts didn't really share BA's favorable evaluation. 

2.  Signability reasons?  Teams evaluated him as being a 5th-10th round type talent, but thought he'd only sign for 2nd or 3rd round money.  I never did hear how much the Cubs paid him, whether it was standard $100-150 type overslot, comparable to a 6th-7th round slot guy, or whether they maybe went a little higher. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 11, 2011, 12:18:26 pm
Jackson leaves the game in the first inning after getting picked off of 2B.  I wonder if injury or ejection? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 11, 2011, 12:46:22 pm
I'd also guess that teams just don't put a lot of emphasis on drafting defensively limited players from smaller schools.  It seems like the Cubs always seem to find some good slugging minor league corner guys in the later rounds of the draft, like Ricky Freeman (19th), Jason Dubois (14th), Micah Hoffpauir (13th), Rebel Ridling (25th), and Blake Lalli (undrafted). Bryan LaHair was a 39th round pick for the Mariners.  Jerry Sands, who has become one of the Dodgers top prospects, was a 25th round pick from a small school.

I'm sure most teams just view big sluggers who play corner positions from non-BCS schools as being a dime a dozen and draft them accordingly.

Maybe with a guy like Bour, we got lucky and found our own Jerry Sands.  If I had to guess, though, Bour is probably more on his way to a Dubois/Hoffpauir/LaHair career.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 11, 2011, 12:56:53 pm
Oh yeah, Mark Grace was a 24th rounder too. 

I just imagine if you're a 1B/LF guy that isn't playing in a power conference or another power school like Rice or Cal State Fullerton, you're pretty much not going to be a big priority for scouts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2011, 01:58:49 pm
Wasn't Grace injured at the time he was drafted?  It seems to me that he did not play at all that first year, due to injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 11, 2011, 03:30:35 pm
It might be that guys that play corner positions and have non-athletic bodies are devalued by scouts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 11, 2011, 06:41:28 pm
Flaherty: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_11_hunaax_tenaax_1


Not a good day for Struck or Rhee:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_11_dbcafa_jupafa_1


Iowa PPn'd
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 11, 2011, 09:35:01 pm
Kirk: 6-4-1-1-0-1

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_11_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 11, 2011, 09:53:58 pm
Man, I spend too much time online.

I read that as Iowa PWNED.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 11, 2011, 10:37:37 pm
Jes,

Didn't think Braun made his way to high A till his 22 year old season and his 21 year old season was spent between rookie league and low a.  May be misreading myself, but here's the link. 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=braun-001rya   

i do think Vitters would put up some impressive numbers in rookie or low a this year if i'm reading that right, however.

Also, I'm not saying I think Vitters will turn into Braun, i was merely using him as an example of a guy with a big stick who really doesn't have a position at which he excels, but you find a spot in the field for him irregardless.

The thing that excites me most about Vitters is his k rate combined with his supposed sweet swing.  Have the Cubs ever had a power prospect who didn't k 30% of his at bats in the minors?  i honestly can't think of any right off hand.  Either way, i'm hoping in the next couple of seasons he can learn which strikes he needs to swing out and which he doesn't and have the ability to employ that learning.  And, if he can do that, i'd expect his walk rate to improve too.  I think this may have been said about him already, but i don't see much middle ground for him...he's either gonna be an all star or a flame out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 12, 2011, 12:26:29 am
From Bruce Miles:

Talked to Oneri Fleita. He said there is nothing seriously wrong with pitcher Hayden Simpson, last year’s No. 1 draft choice. Simpson came out of last night’s start for Peoria with shoulder tightness. The Peoria Journal Star’s Kevin Capie tweeted today that Simpson was taking pitchers fielding practice today. Oneri said it appears Simpson may have slept on the shoulder wrong. If anything, he’ll miss one start.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 12, 2011, 12:30:00 am
Knoxville News-Sentinel:

lead-off hitter Brett Jackson hurt a finger on his left hand on a steal in the opening inning. Jackson left for Chicago to see a hand specialist and will miss at least the next two games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2011, 01:07:45 am
A day after pitching just one one inning, Chiefs pitcher Hayden Simpson participated in pre-game workouts. Chiefs manager Casey Kopitzke said: “All indications are that he’s fine and will be all right. The doctor said there’s nothing that stands out so we’ll go from there.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 12, 2011, 07:03:33 am
Thanks for the injury research, guys.  Hopefully both will be fine.  I admit the "slept on it wrong" explanation combined with "nothing stands out" doesn't seem totally reassuring. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2011, 08:22:50 am
Jes,

Didn't think Braun made his way to high A till his 22 year old season and his 21 year old season was spent between rookie league and low a.  May be misreading myself, but here's the link. 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=braun-001rya   

Ray, Braun was born November 17, 1983, meaning he turned 20 on November 17, 2003, meaning he turned 21 on November 17, 2004, and was 21 the entire season of 2005.... which his first season in the minors, which he spent in Rookie ball and low A ball, and produced the stats I referenced.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 12, 2011, 08:51:24 am
jes,

i was just going by what what baseball reference said his age during each time period he was at those levels was, so you may want to let them know they were wrong.  If i was wrong, i was going by what i thought was a reputable source said, I thought i checked it twice to make sure i wasn't misreading but maybe i mis-read anyway...who knows....i honestly don't have the care to argue over it either way....unless you were computing it in jes years, and even then i really don't have the wherewithal to want to argue.  I just think Vitters has a chance to be a solid hitter...that is all.  I brought up Braun cuz he's an above average bat with no position he excells or is even good at, just the kind of guy you find a spot for....there really was no more to my thinking than that....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 12, 2011, 09:46:45 am
Ray, you are correct and jes recognized that in his recent post.  Earlier he'd thought Braun had played high-A at age 21, but you were correct that it was low-A, and he didn't reach the FSL till his 2nd year at age 22. 

I think the point holds, that if Vitters hits enough (Braun analogy), you can find a place for him defensively even if he stinks (Braun analogy) wherever you put him. 

The "if" is obviously the hitting well.  Braun had a .948 OPS throughout his minor league career; he always produced a lot.  Vitters has a .748 OPS throughout his minor league career.  Basically he's never produced much. 

Who knows what Vitters will be, he's young enough so that nobody can know his future. 

But just being a low-K guy doesn't necessarily get you far, without power, OBP, speed, defense, or at least something to go with it. 

reb correctly notes that Vitters BABIP is low.  He's always been a low BABIP guy, relative to minor league BABIP averages (which are higher than the major-league BABIP average).  We had this same discussion when his K-rate, BABIP, and production were also low in the AFL, which was again a small sample size.  His BABIP thus far is really low, so it will come up; but we probably shouldn't expect it to be minor-league average, nor to be well-above-minor-league-average as is typical for most top prospects. 

As a slow bad-ball outer, Vitters will probably always be something of a low BABIP guy. 
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 12, 2011, 11:56:04 am
Regardless of age, a high first round draft choice should have accomplished more in the minors than Vitters has so far.  I'm for writing him off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 12, 2011, 12:01:13 pm
That seems fair.  Go ahead and write him off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 12, 2011, 12:48:44 pm
Steve Clevenger moves up to Iowa to take Welington Castillo's roster spot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 12, 2011, 12:55:52 pm
Craig- I'm not sure that Vitters' year-by-year BABIP clearly shows that he necessarily projects as a low BABIP guy.  True, that has happened at the AA level but not so much before that.

Major Legue BABIP is around .297-298.  Higher in the minors by about 5% and maybe more in the low minors?  Not sure, but perhaps .315-325 or so?

Vitters was .377 BABIP in 2008, .296 in 2009, and .341 at Daytona in 2010.  He plummeted to .241 BABIP at AA in 2010 and is. 224 at AA so far this season.

So, he is really, really low at AA in two partial seasons--2010 and so far this season, but seems like he is pretty close to average before that. 

I am not saying that the low BABIP at AA is entirely a matter of luck, but I'm guessing that there is a luck factor and that his overall numbers will get better as the luck evens out.  We'll see as to what extent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 12, 2011, 01:06:04 pm
Regardless of age, a high first round draft choice should have accomplished more in the minors than Vitters has so far.  I'm for writing him off.

Compared to Mike Moustakas--same draft--Vitters is not even close.  But, Vitters is almost a full year younger than Moustakas and the latter didn't really put up big numbers until age 21--same age as Vitters is NOW.  So, let's see how this season plays out.  I have no idea if the guy will emerge or not, but I think the writer-offers are a bit premature.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 12, 2011, 01:15:14 pm
Full-season minor-league BABIP is around .310.  No significant trend from A-AA-AAA, the only notable outlier is the California League.  I think Vitters is a career .297 or so?   It may be just a fluke at AA this year, AFL last fall, and AA last summer. 

I haven't checked this, but my impression is that good prospects routinely BABIP well above the minor-league average.  For Murton or Pie or Jackson or Clevenger to sustainably BABIP at .340 or better in the minors isn't at all rare. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 12, 2011, 01:30:26 pm
Thanks Craig for the BABIP details.  It makes sense that a top prospect should outperform the league BABIP average.  I'm not sure that .297 compared to .310 is statistically significant, but if he should be above league average, the disparity is greater. What is statistically significant is the AA BABIP--not sure what to make of that.

As discussed a lot, a guy who is putting the ball in play on pitches he should be taking is consistent with the notion that such a hitter will be below-average on BABIP.  If that's where his profile stays, he's not going to make it. 

On the other hand, he's able to do that, in part, because of exceptional hand-eye coordination and, at age 21 at AA level, it's not out of the question that such a player can learn something going forward.  If Vitters gets hot in the near future, I suspect the doubters might take a second look.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 12, 2011, 01:50:17 pm
I'd be more confident in Vitters' ability to learn and adapt if he hadn't come off in every interview as dumb as a stump.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 12, 2011, 01:56:33 pm
I'm not writing off Vitters, although it's still tough to be excited about him now.  Anybody that strikes out as infrequently as he does and has flashed power potential is always someone to keep an eye on.

I think the Cubs should write him off as a third baseman, though.  It's just not going to happen there, and if we believe Barney is going to be the answer the next couple of years at second, it'd probably be good to get LeMaheiu moved over there and playing third regularly.
 
The Cubs should groom Vitters as a Soriano replacement.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 12, 2011, 02:55:09 pm
I agree with JR.  Vitters has a gift for contact as a hitter, and he has some power possibility.  So he could click something in offensively someday. 

But it's hard to imagine him ever clicking in as a big-league defensive 3B. 

May as well get him off of 3B so that Lemahieu and Flaherty can get the work they need there.  And get Vitters the work that he'll need for 1B or LF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 12, 2011, 03:16:49 pm
I can see the argument for moving Vitters to LF or 1B, but I'm not sure why that would be helpful for his offense.  He has been a 3B as a HS player and isn't learning a new position that might be a distraction from his offense.  Indeed, he's playing some 1B now.  You move him when he's hurting the club defensively more at 3B than he would be at another position, such as Braun's move to LF.

I suppose this is primarily a scouting assessment for those who have seen him.  If he just doesn't have the tools and focus to play 3B,  then you move him.  Evidently, Cubs haven't reached that point yet.  Vitters has a .905 career fielding % at 3B.  Aramis Ramirez had a .900 career fielding % at 3B during his minor league career and improved to the point of adequacy at the position.  I don't see the rush to move Vitters at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 12, 2011, 03:37:34 pm
I think the rush might be to give him some value as a utility player because people don't think he's ever going to be a starter.

I could be wrong about that, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 12, 2011, 05:29:45 pm
The Smokies have placed Brett Jackson on the DL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 12, 2011, 05:33:57 pm
And to replace Jackson and Steve Clevenger:

The Tennessee Smokies, Double-A minor league affiliate of the Chicago Cubs, have added C Luis Flores and OF Nelson Perez to the active roster in advance of the team's Thursday evening game with the Huntsville Stars.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 12, 2011, 07:01:37 pm
Ray, you are correct and jes recognized that in his recent post.  Earlier he'd thought Braun had played high-A at age 21, but you were correct that it was low-A, and he didn't reach the FSL till his 2nd year at age 22. 

I think the point holds, that if Vitters hits enough (Braun analogy), you can find a place for him defensively even if he stinks (Braun analogy) wherever you put him. 

The "if" is obviously the hitting well.  Braun had a .948 OPS throughout his minor league career; he always produced a lot.  Vitters has a .748 OPS throughout his minor league career.  Basically he's never produced much. 

Who knows what Vitters will be, he's young enough so that nobody can know his future. 

But just being a low-K guy doesn't necessarily get you far, without power, OBP, speed, defense, or at least something to go with it. 

reb correctly notes that Vitters BABIP is low.  He's always been a low BABIP guy, relative to minor league BABIP averages (which are higher than the major-league BABIP average).  We had this same discussion when his K-rate, BABIP, and production were also low in the AFL, which was again a small sample size.  His BABIP thus far is really low, so it will come up; but we probably shouldn't expect it to be minor-league average, nor to be well-above-minor-league-average as is typical for most top prospects. 

As a slow bad-ball outer, Vitters will probably always be something of a low BABIP guy. 
 

My bad then....i had been up bout 30 hrs at that point between work and other unavoidable happenings and my reading comprehension wasn't what it should have been
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2011, 09:04:44 pm
Whitenack: 6 IP, 3 R, 12-2 GO/FO

Flaherty: 3-4, 2 2B, 4 RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_12_hunaax_tenaax_1


Jackson: 5-9-6-6-3-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_12_iowaaa_cspaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Daytona:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_12_dbcafa_jupafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2011, 09:15:57 pm
Ray, Craig is right that I made a mistake in my first post in saying Braun split the year between rookie and high A when it was actually rookie and low A.  Though I corrected it in my 2nd post, I honestly did not even notice in the second post that I had made the error in the first one.

I simply like to actually put real figures to comparisons, not to make anyone look bad in the comparison they made (at least not generally), but simply because it makes sense to look at what we in fact think are meaningful comparisons to see if they are.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2011, 09:33:13 pm
Beeler returns: 3-3-0-0-0-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_12_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 12, 2011, 10:06:00 pm
Bruce Levine says that B. Jackson's hand issue is a "bruised left pinkie."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2011, 10:37:24 pm
Bryan LeHair destroying the PCL again:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_12_iowaaa_cspaaa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 13, 2011, 12:09:24 am
Iowa second game

Bobby Scales 5-5, John Gaub had a bad inning

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t451&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_12_iowaaa_cspaaa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 13, 2011, 11:07:27 am
Brett Jackson will be out for a week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 13, 2011, 11:38:34 am
Because of signability issues, Keith Law's latest mock draft has this guy falling to the Cubs at the #9 overall pick.  Just speculation of course, but this would be an intteresting pick.

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/diamondbacks/articles/2011/05/11/20110511arizona-diamondbacks-bubba-starling-mlb-draft-prospect.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 13, 2011, 12:50:24 pm
*waiting for deeg to weigh in*
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 13, 2011, 12:58:05 pm
Strike, two reasons why that will never happen:

1. Ricketts will want whoever is most signable and cheap for the slot.
2. Given that at least one other team will have heard of Bubba without the help of Google, Wilken would never consider him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 13, 2011, 01:08:10 pm
3.  There's somebody most teams have ranked outside of their Top 100 that Wilken wants to shock the world with.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 13, 2011, 01:52:36 pm
Thanks, Deeg, you made my day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 13, 2011, 01:57:32 pm
The scouting report sounds much like Ryan Harvey, apart from the football-based price inflation. 

Would be exciting to get a position player with serious power, though.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on May 13, 2011, 02:12:37 pm
Word is he won't fall past KC. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 13, 2011, 02:14:46 pm
Personally, I don't like right-handed hitters coming out of high school as high first round picks.

It just seems that those guys flame out regularly but that might just be my perception or just the Cubs luck.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 13, 2011, 07:00:27 pm
Trey McNutt removed after 2 innings tonight.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 13, 2011, 07:05:05 pm
Trey McNutt removed after 2 innings tonight.


Important news:

According to Mick Gillispie of Smokies Radio , Trey McNutt's last name is pronounced "MacNutt"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 13, 2011, 07:09:06 pm
Trey McNutt removed after 2 innings tonight.


Could this be related to the Doug Davis start Saturday?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 13, 2011, 07:19:14 pm
Jim Hendry probably traded McNutt for Carlos Beltran.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 13, 2011, 10:10:36 pm
Lemahieu: 3-4, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_13_hunaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Kurcz back in the rotation: 4-1/3 -3-0-0-2-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_13_dbcafa_jupafa_1


Szczur has temporarily left the Chiefs to graduate from Villanova:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_13_peoafx_kccafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 13, 2011, 10:26:09 pm
Coello: 5-11-12-12-2-7, 5 HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_13_iowaaa_cspaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 13, 2011, 11:22:13 pm
Seems like the Cuello to the rotation isn't working out quite like the Cubs were hoping.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 14, 2011, 02:38:27 am
I'm for drafting whoever Wilken is high on...his track record is as good as anyone's.  I hated the Simpson pick as soon as i heard it simply because i wanted someone who, as a fan, would excite me.  Basically, i wanted a name that i knew, who i had read scouting reports on, and who i dreamed would be there when the cubs picked, because they were some can't miss prospect.  And, i will freely admit that is wrong of me.  The job of a scouting director is to find guys who have a chance at being contributing major league players, not to make picks that excite the fans.  I know Wilken was high on Lincecum...I'm hoping maybe he looks at Simpson and saw another fast track Lincecum.  But, really, who knows what he sees?  I do know mono has set him back severely tho.

To me, he is one of the better, if not the best, scouting directors the Cubs have ever had.  He is not afraid to take the guy who he believes has the best chance at succeeding rather than the guy baseball america conditions us to believe he should take.  Successful leaders do not succumb to group think and with his track record, i trust him over baseball america.  He may flame out as a cubs scouting director despite what he did in toronto, but i'd still rather him make the pick he believes is the right pick, over a pick he's less likely to get flack for if the prospect fails because everyone had him rated so high.  That's just not what successful leaders do. 

Just be thankful we don't have Stockstill anymore.  lol
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 14, 2011, 07:04:58 am
The job of a scouting director is to find guys who have a chance at being contributing major league players, not to make picks that excite the fans....   Successful leaders do not succumb to group think and with his track record, i trust him over baseball america.

Utter sacrilege.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 14, 2011, 03:25:22 pm
...The job of a scouting director is to find guys who have a chance at being contributing major league players, not to make picks that excite the fans.  .....

I agree with your post as a whole, Ray, absolutely.  But that phrase "contributing" struck me as a low bar. 


You can probably win 70 or 80 games a year with contributing players.  But somehow sometimes you need to get some special players.    Pujols is more than just a "contributing" player.  Lincecum and Cain were more than just "contributors" for the Giants. 


Hendry and Fleita often brag about the productive farm system, and it has generated contributing major leaguers.  But while Theriot, Barney, Mike Wuertz, and Samardzija are contributing major leaguers, but you need some studs.  To date that's been a problem.  At some point, if the Cubs are going to win it all, I think they are going to need to produce some special stars.  Not just #2 and #8 hitters and #4 starters, but we're going to need some high-quality middle-of-the-order hitters and rotation ace(s). 


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 14, 2011, 04:51:42 pm
Well said, craig.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 14, 2011, 05:26:55 pm
Another mock draft with Cubs taking Bubba Starling.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/mock-draft/2011/2611735.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 14, 2011, 05:30:46 pm
Starling is going to be a huge bust.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 14, 2011, 05:36:20 pm
This draft is supposed to be loaded. It'd be nice if the Cubs got something out of it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 14, 2011, 06:28:10 pm
I love the way the players union will apparently be allowed to negotiate away the rights of folks who are not only not members of the union, but will no be members of the union when the results of the negotiation are imposed on them, and won't at that time even be allowed to join the union.  Cool.


http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AoyXz4Cmc0sf3ulPbTVz7aoRvLYF?slug=jp-passan_mlb_amateur_draft_slotting_bonuses_051311

Sides dig in for battle over slotting in amateur draft

By Jeff Passan, Yahoo! Sports
May 14, 12:28 am EDT

With the relationship genial as ever between Major League Baseball and the players’ union, it stands to reason they’ll figure out how to bridge their philosophical differences on an amateur draft overhaul that includes pre-determined bonuses for each pick.

After surveying a cross-section of executives, agents and representatives of MLB and the union, one thing is certain: It’s not going to be that easy.

On one end is Rob Manfred, MLB’s chief labor negotiator and an advocate of the so-called slotting system that assigns a fixed dollar value to every draft pick. While MLB desires an international draft, sources said its implementation remains extremely unlikely for the next collective-bargaining agreement, which will replace the one that expires Dec. 11.

More From Jeff Passan
Agent puts kibosh on Royals locking up Hosmer May 12, 2011
Dumb luck brought Britton his out pitch May 12, 2011


Stephen Strasburg got a $15.1 million bonus from the Nationals, part of a trend that sees big money lavished upon unproven players.
(AP)
The slot issue, however, is one MLB will not concede without a fight.

“It continues to be an important component of the overall reform of amateur talent acquisition we want to achieve,” Manfred said.

On the other end are the agents that help advise the MLB Players Association’s brain trust, and the mere idea of a slotting system this week evoked laughter, anger and outright dismissal among them.

“There is no way,” one agent said, “there will be a slotting system.”

“Never,” another agent said. “Never, ever will happen.”

Somewhere in the middle sit the players, the MLBPA’s truest voices and, in all likelihood, the ultimate arbiters of the draft slotting debate. Former union chief Don Fehr called this a “wedge issue” for good reason. While the Washington Nationals gave Stephen Strasburg(notes) $15.1 million and Bryce Harper(notes) $9.9 million as the No. 1 overall picks, veterans went unsigned or fetched less than anticipated. It sent a bad message: Big money, previously the domain of union members on 40-man rosters, instead was going to unproven kids.

At the same time, the union is certain its players will overlook the big dollar values at the top for the empirical fear: Any sort of a cap on salaries, even for amateur players, opens the Pandora’s box for MLB to suggest one in other facets of the game.

True or not, it’s the union’s party line, and it’s not changing.

MLB implemented an amateur draft in 1965 to curtail the exorbitant bonuses going to amateur players and stifled the market for the next 25 years until agent Scott Boras helped Brien Taylor negotiate a $1.55 million bonus as the No. 1 pick in 1991. The thaw in bonuses continued for the next 20 years, even as the commissioner’s office instituted recommended – but unenforceable – slots, to which only foolish franchises adhered.

The increase in bonuses has scared teams away from the best available player and allowed superior talent to slip because of signability concerns, a problem for a draft supposedly designed to distribute talent evenly. It’s also something agents do not believe slotting would solve.

“Slotting will never work because the men who are trained to evaluate this game – it handcuffs them,” Boras said. “It also does not recognize the revenue increases that change annually in the game. It also does not recognize the potential for a decline in revenue. The fact that there’s flexibility for the experts to manage this – that’s the best thing that can happen.”

The benefits of a slotting system for MLB aren’t terribly compelling. For a sport that in recent years has lost some of its best athletes to football, the lure of large bonuses keeps some players from jumping. Bubba Starling and Archie Bradley, two projected first-round picks this year, signed with Nebraska and Oklahoma, respectively, to play quarterback, and will command higher-than-recommended bonuses to keep them off campus and on the diamond. For top-end talent, teams usually don’t balk.

They spend around $200 million on the draft every year, and between 40 and 45 percent of that goes to picks in the first two rounds. Even if MLB wants to depress the market by $50 million, it’s scant savings, not even $2 million a team, surely not enough to offset what they’ll have to give up to get a slotting concession. There are no guarantees, either, that the money saved via the draft would go to major leaguers. The union’s aversion, though always money-oriented, is more about why MLB would push so hard for something with such little tangible value.

Nevertheless, it could have an effect on the draft, which starts June 6. Some scouts believe their teams plan to spend big this year, throwing big dollars at high school players in late rounds with hopes of swaying them from college commitments. If indeed slotting comes into effect for the next collective-bargaining agreement, industrious owners willing to take a risk could ration some of 2012’s budget to 2011.

At the same time, one AL general manager believes that’s backward thinking.

“We have the leverage,” he said. “If a high school player doesn’t want to sign for a million dollars in the first round, the chances of him getting more than that, coupled with the opportunity cost, coupled with the time-value of money – all those things factored in, it’s not close.”

Another point: With same-slot compensation – if a team can’t sign a pick in the first three rounds, it receives that same pick, one spot later, the next year (i.e. Arizona didn’t sign Barrett Loux, the sixth overall selection last season, and it is picking seventh this year in addition to its regular pick) – teams that don’t sign early picks could do so next year at a discounted rate.

Meanwhile, the negotiating goes on behind closed doors, with the union weighing what, exactly, it would need to justify a concession on slotting. Is an increase in the number of arbitration-eligible players enough? Larger major league rosters? Anything?

“I’ve always felt like the union cares less about [slotting] than they do anything else,” the GM said.

“No. Freaking. Way,” another agent said, sure to emphasize and enunciate each word.

The chasm isn’t surprising. The early stages of collective bargaining tend to perpetuate extreme positions and muscle flexing. Only this is an issue with little compromise available.

Just like in most games of slots, there may be no winners.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 14, 2011, 09:14:50 pm
Vitters: 0-3 ,  No K's over his last 57 AB's. No Ex-Base hits over his last 35 AB's.


Beliveau: 2-0-0-0-0-5 , (5 IP, 1 H, 10 K's in AA)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_14_tenaax_cngaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_14_peoafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Daytona:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_14_ftmafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 14, 2011, 09:45:01 pm
Vitters: 0-3 ,  No K's over his last 57 AB's. No Ex-Base hits over his last 35 AB's.

I was going to joke that that guy had turned into Matty Alou, but Alou hit more more power than that, and a much better average.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 14, 2011, 11:14:25 pm
I agree with your post as a whole, Ray, absolutely.  But that phrase "contributing" struck me as a low bar. 


You can probably win 70 or 80 games a year with contributing players.  But somehow sometimes you need to get some special players.    Pujols is more than just a "contributing" player.  Lincecum and Cain were more than just "contributors" for the Giants. 


Hendry and Fleita often brag about the productive farm system, and it has generated contributing major leaguers.  But while Theriot, Barney, Mike Wuertz, and Samardzija are contributing major leaguers, but you need some studs.  To date that's been a problem.  At some point, if the Cubs are going to win it all, I think they are going to need to produce some special stars.  Not just #2 and #8 hitters and #4 starters, but we're going to need some high-quality middle-of-the-order hitters and rotation ace(s). 




I agree with you.  Its just so hard to find those special players, almost like winning the lottery.  I think you just have to consistently get contributing players, and hope some of those turn into those special guys.  Take some boom or busts, like Reggie Golden and hope for the best...although i don't think the boom wilken had in mind was the sound Golden makes when he walks from showing up so out of shape(wow, thats a bad joke but i'm gonna leave it anyway).  Plus, if you get cheap contributing players, u can buy the special guy on the market.

And I understand its all semantics, but when i think of contributing players, i think of guys who have the ability contribute to a winner, and not guys that contribute to mediocrity...sorry bout that, i should have specified better what i meant.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2011, 12:04:26 am
Carpenter: 2/3 -1-4-4-3-1


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_14_iowaaa_renaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 15, 2011, 11:50:37 am
Was at Daytona last night. I really wonder where Junior Lake's head is at. He's on second with no outs. The batter hits a lazy fly ball to medium center. Lake goes about 1/4 way to third. He sees the ball caught and casually starts back to second not paying any attention to the center fielder who agressively throws to second and Lake is nearly thrown out. He got an earful in the dugout... but WTF? He seems to do this kind of thing with regularity.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2011, 12:16:29 pm
He's practically Cub-ready then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 15, 2011, 01:06:12 pm
The second time that happens, the guy needs to get some very serious time on the pines.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 15, 2011, 01:54:24 pm
ESPN

With the Cubs lacking speed off the bench, one possible option to replace Colvin on the roster is outfielder Tony Campana, who is batting .339 with two triples and seven steals for the Iowa Cubs. Campana, 24, has been with the Cubs organization since 2008 when he was drafted in the 13th round of the First-Year Player Draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 15, 2011, 03:25:57 pm
That's what the Cubs need...another guy who doesn't walk much and hits for no power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2011, 04:13:35 pm
Simpson: 3-1/3 -4-5-3-3-2, HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_15_peoafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2011, 04:15:02 pm
Lemahieu: 2-4, 2B, 3B, 2 RBI, BB ; (19 for last 40)

Vitters: 2-5, HR, 2 RBI, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_15_tenaax_cngaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 15, 2011, 07:09:58 pm
That's what the Cubs need...another guy who doesn't walk much and hits for no power.

But this would be a FAST one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2011, 07:20:56 pm
Ha: 2-3, RBI, BB, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_15_ftmafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_15_iowaaa_renaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 15, 2011, 09:29:48 pm
LeMahieu doing some serious hitting down in Tennessee, including slugging .500.  And Bour, who ArizonaPhil described as a guy that looks like a power hitter and hits like a singles hitter, now has 10 home runs in the hard to hit Florida league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 15, 2011, 09:53:07 pm
If they keep it up, it would be nice to see both of them get some real playing time with a late season call-up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 15, 2011, 09:57:27 pm
Bour could easily have 11. He crushed one last night that was only foul by a couple feet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 15, 2011, 10:40:26 pm
Keys, what else can you share about some of the Daytona guys?  How about Bour, does he look like he can play 1B?  Or does he look like he'd be terrible? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 15, 2011, 10:40:43 pm
Rosscup allowed his first pro HR today. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 15, 2011, 11:06:47 pm
I haven't seen Bour as anything but DH yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 16, 2011, 12:23:33 am
Rubi Silva promoted to Daytona.

Ryan Cuneo and Kyung-Min Na take his place in Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 01:28:06 am
That is a surprise that Silva is going to Daytona.  He hasn't been doing badly, but he has hardly been tearing up the Midwest league, and he isn't particularly young for that league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on May 16, 2011, 01:30:01 am
Note to self:  Not that Silva.  Relax.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 16, 2011, 03:14:20 am
it's funny how his name can gives such an automatic gag reflex...it does to me, too; the weird thing is, is i can't think of a past cub, many who were worse(Estes comes to mind) and for longer periods of time that would do that to me.  Of course, it could also be there weren't any Estes's in the system after he left either.  I wouldn't think anything of seeing a Bradley or Perez in the system either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 16, 2011, 09:58:26 am
From somebody named Kevin Goldstein

Cubs are moving 20-year-old Korean outfielder Jae-Hoon Ha to Double-A.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 16, 2011, 10:08:34 am
Yes...it's true. It's on the Daytona Cubs website
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2011, 11:39:49 am
Ha turns 21 in late October.  In 160 PA he has a line of .311/.344/   .867   with 18 Ks and 18 extra-base hits, 6 HR, which is in line with what he did last year in Peoria, though he is hitting HR more often (7 in 309 PA last year; 6 in 160 PA this year).  He also already has 7 OF assists this season.

Has anyone here actually seen him play?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 11:50:51 am
I saw him play when Peoria played Beloit last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2011, 11:54:55 am
Anything you can tell us about him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 16, 2011, 12:13:38 pm
I saw a few PAs on TV from Ha in Spring Training and he got a couple hits, was caught stealing once.

I didn't see enough to form any opinions about him, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 16, 2011, 12:15:22 pm
I've seen him a number of times at Daytona. He seems to have a good eye and doesn't chase bad pitches. When I've seen him he has batted 3rd in front of Bohr which gives him some good pitches to hit. The 2 homes runs I've seen were clearly out and not wind aided or just barely out. The kid seems to have some power. I have seen him make some good running catches in CF and covers a lot of ground. Seemed a bit slow getting into his throws but very accurate from what I have witnessed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 16, 2011, 12:54:12 pm
Thanks, keys, for your observations on Ha.  Sounds like a very, very interesting prospect. 

I'm kind of questioning whether he has the pure speed to be a high-level big-league CF?  He's too slow to steal, so I'm guessing he's not a burner in center either.  But sometimes a quick jump and a long-strider in center can have excellent range, even without base-stealing quickness/acceleration. Still, I think he may be a guy who's a good minor-league CFer, but ends up in RF (or LF) in the majors. 

This promotion is linked.  Jackson gets injured in AA, so for yesterday Na was actually jumped up to AA just to provide a CF body.  But with Jackson out, Ha goes up to AA, Silva goes up to A+, and Na goes to A-. 

Jackson got injured 5 days ago, and was placed on the 7-day DL, I think somebody said he'd be out for a week.  I suspect that these other CF shuffles suggest that the Cubs expect Jackson to miss more than a week..... 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 16, 2011, 01:00:18 pm
Craig - I agree the Ha promotion is part of some larger plan.  What I'm wondering is if it involves Tyler Colvin.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 16, 2011, 01:53:24 pm
Cactus, that's some larger plan than I'd envisioned.  My understanding is that not only is Jackson injured at AA, that their other CF, Jim Adduci, is also DL'd.  So with both of them DL'd, I figured they just bumped everybody else up a level (Ha --> AA, Silva --> A+, Na --> A-).

But, you could be right.  Somebody suggested CF Campana going up to Chicago to replace RF Colvin.  If so, then perhaps even after he gets from DL Jackson could go up to Iowa to replace Campana. 

Personally, I don't support that, yet, given how Jackson got hot but hasn't sustained that, and isn't doing that great in AA.  (29th in the league in batting average, tie for 19th in HR's, 7th in OPS, K-rate is higher than either of past two years, 30K/4HR ratio is not that hot either.)  So if/when Jackson gets healthy, I'd rather send him back to AA and see how he rides the ups and downs for a while longer there. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 16, 2011, 01:57:20 pm
Cactus, that's some larger plan than I'd envisioned.   
Tyler Colvin is in Cincinnati taking BP so if anything is going to happen, it is not imminent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2011, 02:08:51 pm
I'm kind of questioning whether he has the pure speed to be a high-level big-league CF?  He's too slow to steal, so I'm guessing he's not a burner in center either.  But sometimes a quick jump and a long-strider in center can have excellent range, even without base-stealing quickness/acceleration. Still, I think he may be a guy who's a good minor-league CFer, but ends up in RF (or LF) in the majors.

He has enough speed to have been willing to try to steal at least 13 times this year in 35 games, and also 13 time last year in 77 games, so that is encouraging.  Joe Dimaggio never had more than 7 attempts in a season in the majors, and Curt Flood averaged only about 12 attempts a year, and both of them were pretty good CFers, so the lack of steals, for an organization which has not done much to push that, may not mean much,
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 02:41:58 pm
Jes - I only saw him in three games, so the information will be quite incomplete.  He was a catcher in high school in Korea, and the Cubs tried him there in his first year, but we were told that he didn't do well there, and was moved to the outfield.  He seems to have some power, hitting a long home run to right center, and I didn't see him swing at too many bad pitches.  He has a very strong, accurate arm, making a throw from medium deep right field to the third baseman on the fly, coming into third base waist high on the fly.  He is not a speed burner, but seems to have the speed to be a more than adequate CF.  I would compare his speed to that of Byrd, or perhaps that of Colvin.

The report I got from a scout was that he would probably have power for 20 - 25 home runs per year, with quite good contact.  He strongly advocated that the Cubs try him at third base, but it doesn't seem that the Cubs are considering that, although he did take ground balls there during practice last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2011, 03:35:10 pm
Not quite complete is worlds better than what most of us had.  My info on the guy went no further than his stat page.

Thanks for the report.

He sounds like the kind of guy it could be very nice to have on a team as a regular for several years, even if never reaching star status.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 04:42:32 pm
To me, Ha represents the improvement in the Cubs system over the past years.  They are not long on star-quality prospects, but are very deep in Barney-like prospects that are needed on every good team.  Ha, Flaherty, Bour, LeMahieu, Clevenger and others provide an inventory of prospects that can contribute for years to come.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 16, 2011, 07:20:52 pm
If Ha does really does have the attributes that comprise a good third baseman, would not trying him there suggest a confidence in Vitters?  I can't see any reason they wouldn't want to, unless the cubs brass doesn't share the same opinion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 07:44:18 pm
I think it is more likely that the Cubs just don't agree with the scout I mentioned.  Or perhaps they want a RF prospect with a strong arm.  Or, as you say, they might think that it is easier to find room for an extra outfielder than it is for an extra third baseman.

In addition to Vitters, they also have Marquez and Flaherty at relatively high levels in their system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 16, 2011, 08:16:30 pm
Yeah...and I know Ha wouldn't help next year if Ramirez is gone, but i don't want to go through another 100 third basemen before we find a long term replacement like last time if he is.  Hopefully one of those 3 turns into an above average regular.  Would love for one to turn into one of those special guys but probably too much to ask for.

Going off your scout friends comments and your own opinions, which of those guys do you believe has the best chance to be an above average contributor at 3b?  not highest ceiling, just to actually contribute.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 08:32:42 pm
I haven't seen Flaherty play third, nor have I talked about his defense to anyone, but if he can play an acceptable defense, I suspect Flaherty would be the most likely to play there on a regular basis.  From what I have heard, Vitters is likely to be a first baseman, and I have not heard much positive about marquez.

The Cubs have a couple of very raw kids in the low minors, Geiger and Darvil, that ArizonaPhil is reasonably high on, but they are years and years away at best.

If Lake can ever get his head together, he may well be the most likely to be there in two years or so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 16, 2011, 08:37:27 pm
I always loved the scouting connection you had and hated when he retired...i do wish we could have a second prospect related thread that was just for scouting information because when you want to go back and look for what some publication or scout thought or said about someone, it is near impossible to find it here.  You could still post the information in both spots, of course, but only allow the comments about the information here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2011, 08:59:09 pm
I always loved the scouting connection you had and hated when he retired...i do wish we could have a second prospect related thread that was just for scouting information because when you want to go back and look for what some publication or scout thought or said about someone, it is near impossible to find it here.  You could still post the information in both spots, of course, but only allow the comments about the information here.

Good idea.

I think another good idea would be for Dave to find another friend who is still scouting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 09:00:54 pm
In my entire life I have only had two friends, and I had to pay one of them.

Finding a new friend isn't all that likely.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2011, 09:02:08 pm
Yea, I knew that suggestion would never fly....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 09:02:25 pm
Ray - Email me at dpol@mail.com
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 16, 2011, 09:11:58 pm
Could use a draft topic. And not just for this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 16, 2011, 09:14:14 pm
Ha: 2-4, 2B

Vitters: 1-4, 2 K, E, PO


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_16_tenaax_cngaax_1


Daytona:


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_16_ftmafa_dbcafa_1


Chiefs off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 16, 2011, 09:58:33 pm
email sent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 16, 2011, 10:10:28 pm
In my entire life I have only had two friends, and I had to pay one of them.

Finding a new friend isn't all that likely.

You paid that other guy?  Hey, when do I get mine?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 11:00:03 pm
"Friend" is the operative word here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 16, 2011, 11:00:29 pm
Curt, I think DaveP owes you a trip to Morton's.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 16, 2011, 11:12:43 pm
Yeah...and I know Ha wouldn't help next year if Ramirez is gone, but i don't want to go through another 100 third basemen before we find a long term replacement like last time if he is.  Hopefully one of those 3 turns into an above average regular.  Would love for one to turn into one of those special guys but probably too much to ask for.

Going off your scout friends comments and your own opinions, which of those guys do you believe has the best chance to be an above average contributor at 3b?  not highest ceiling, just to actually contribute.

My 3B rankings of the guys mentioned and not mentioned:
1.  Lemahieu
2.  Flaherty
3.  Vitters  (his defense seems prohibitively bad, and it's not like he's actually done much hitting yet either.) 
4.  Lake.  No head, no brains, doesn't try, can't catch, can't throw straight, can't hit the ball very often, can't get on base, and little effective power.  Almost no chance that he's going to solve 3B.  But his chances, remote as they are, are better than Smith's. 
5.  Smith

I think Lemahieu and Flaherty are well ahead of the other three on my list because both can catch the ball (when they can reach it), and both can throw straight.  They aren't dazzlers, but they aren't error factories either.  Defensively, they might have limited ceilings, but both have the ability to probably play 3B well enough to contribute.  And both have some hitting. 

I think Lemahieu is definitely on the top of my list for 3B.  He doesn't have the highest ceiling, but he can hit, he can catch groundballs that he can reach, and he can throw straight.  He may not hit the most HR's or have the greatest 3B range or walk as much as you'd like.  But he's a pure hitter, he's always hit for average, and he's been a consistently low errors guy. 

He seems so far ahead of Vitters both defensively and as a hitter, and the age gap is only one year, so it's not like he's years ahead. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 16, 2011, 11:17:04 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_16_iowaaa_renaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 16, 2011, 11:24:44 pm
4.  Lake.  No head, no brains, doesn't try, can't catch, can't throw straight, can't hit the ball very often, can't get on base, and little effective power.

Sounds more like a backup catcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2011, 11:25:49 pm
Craig - I also have LeMahieu ahead of Flaherty, but I haven't given up on him as a second baseman.  If I had my way, I would move towards a Barney/LeMahieu double play combo, with Castro playing in center field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 16, 2011, 11:55:22 pm
The following was posted on Bruce Miles' blog by someone who summarized BA guys talking about Vitters, Flaherty, and others .  I didn't hear the report, so can't vouch for the summary below.  But, FWIW, here it is:

Baseball America show on MLB radio on XM talks Cubs

John Manuel and JJ Cooper now have a 1 hour radio show on Sunday nights at 7 pm EST. Last night talked some about the Cubs. Caller asked about Cubs prospects other than McNutt and Jackson.

They talked about Vitters quite a bit. Compared him to Moustakas in that the great hand eye coordination is working against him. Said he will have to learn NOT to swing at pitchers pitches (pitches on or just off the corners) to be a regular major leaguer. Said that the Cubs have to be concerned, but he is still young and sometimes the light will switch on rather quickly. So far, he has now shown the aptitude.

After that, they talked alot about Ryan Flaherty. They (John Manuel and JJ Cooper) said they think Flaherty is the Cubs 3rd baseman of the future. Talked about his excellent left handed power, and his versatility.

One thought LaMahieu might be a very good utility player, one talked about what an excellent hit tool he has and that he seems to be getting better at 2nd base defensively. Not enough power for 3rd base, but could be a very good major league 2ndbaseman.

They were both in agreement that Micah Gibbs could be a good backup catcher in the major leagues, on the level of a Ryan Hannigan (of the Reds). Talked about that there is good value in that, but that is disappointing for a 2nd round pick. You never know though. I think they once thought the same of Soto.

They were both EXTREMELY high on Matt Szczur. Said he is a little behind due to the 2 sport thing, but they love his athleticism and there has been very quick improvement and development in his game. They said average to slightly above average major league power (translates into 15 - 20 HRs, with maybe a few seasons in the 20s), but a very good hit tool and one of the fastest players in the game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 17, 2011, 12:10:40 am
I would bet Flaherty will be the opening day 3B for the Cubs in 2012.  That would fit with Ricketts' strategy of managing the Cubs like a small-market team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 17, 2011, 12:44:43 am
My 3B rankings of the guys mentioned and not mentioned:
1.  Lemahieu
2.  Flaherty
3.  Vitters  (his defense seems prohibitively bad, and it's not like he's actually done much hitting yet either.) 
4.  Lake.  No head, no brains, doesn't try, can't catch, can't throw straight, can't hit the ball very often, can't get on base, and little effective power.  Almost no chance that he's going to solve 3B.  But his chances, remote as they are, are better than Smith's. 
5.  Smith

I think Lemahieu and Flaherty are well ahead of the other three on my list because both can catch the ball (when they can reach it), and both can throw straight.  They aren't dazzlers, but they aren't error factories either.  Defensively, they might have limited ceilings, but both have the ability to probably play 3B well enough to contribute.  And both have some hitting. 

I think Lemahieu is definitely on the top of my list for 3B.  He doesn't have the highest ceiling, but he can hit, he can catch groundballs that he can reach, and he can throw straight.  He may not hit the most HR's or have the greatest 3B range or walk as much as you'd like.  But he's a pure hitter, he's always hit for average, and he's been a consistently low errors guy. 

He seems so far ahead of Vitters both defensively and as a hitter, and the age gap is only one year, so it's not like he's years ahead. 



I would love for Lemahieu to be make it to the show one day...I've been a big fan of his since his days at lsu.  He was one heck of a hitter, and i was thrilled when the Cubs drafted him.  I'd prefer he make it as a second baseman tho, because i think he'd have a better chance of being a plus position player there.  I see him eventually having some pop, but not enough to make him a plus at third base.

Speaking of another LSU guy, I was shocked at how much trouble Gibbs had at adjusting to minor league pitching.  He hit .322 as a freshman at lsu and .345 during sec competition.  Hit .388 his junior draft year and .432 in sec competition and then couldn't hit his weight in low a.  Glad to see he is doing better this year, but did anyone ever hear what his problem was in Boise and i just missed it?

I knew the Cubs were rumored to be a landing spot for Jared Mitchell, but was thrilled that he was gone before they picked...that was a guy i was not very high on.  Lots of physical talent but I just couldn't see him being able to hit for enough average as he climbed the minor league ladder to amount to anything.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 17, 2011, 12:44:49 am
Probably as good a move as any at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2011, 01:12:44 am
Szczur's going to hit 15-20 homers? Okay.....

And this meme of Vitters' issue being that he's too good a hitter to produce is annoying. Darn it, he just hits those pitches on the corner too much and they all happen to result in outs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 17, 2011, 02:06:10 am
From all the reports I've seen, Vitters comes across poorly in his dealings with the press and speaking with fans. But is he just uncomfortable with public speaking, or is he dumb as sackful of hammers?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on May 17, 2011, 07:19:18 am
I don't understand why some think we are going to become a small market team.  We have so much money tied up in losers that it might be the best thing to do is let them come off the books first.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 17, 2011, 08:36:52 am
I had forgotten this

Tyler Colvin was promoted from Double-A Tennessee in 2009 and has not played at the Triple-A level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2011, 02:14:27 pm
Silva: 2-4, HR, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_17_ftmafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2011, 04:53:17 pm
Jackson: 3-8-7-7-3-1, 2 HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_17_iowaaa_renaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2011, 05:59:36 pm
Remember when there was some optimism over the Cubs starting pitching prospects?

Now Archer is gone, Cashner is having reoccurring shoulder problems, Ryu has not come back well from elbow surgery, Carpenter is struggling as a reliever and Jay Jackson has regressed. You could throw in Simpson's slow start and one game shoulder issue too.

And you wonder why the organization seems destined for failure.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 17, 2011, 07:12:02 pm
ArizonaPhil

Recently signed 27-year old Cuban defector INF Rafael Valdes made his U. S. debut at Fitch Park today, playing shortstop and hitting 4th. Valdes made one error, booting a hard hit grounder in the 4th, but he also handled several other chances smoothly, including a couple of nifty turns on two key DP grounders. The lanky 6’2 165 right-handed hitting Valdes went 1-5 at the plate, reaching base on an infield hit in his first AB, then flying out to CF (once to the warning track) in his next three PA, before popping out weakly to the 1st baseman in his final AB. Given his age and experience (he played in international tournaments with Team Cuba and several seasons for Pinar Del Rio in the Cuban National Series, hitting 310/386/543 in his final season before defecting in 2009), I would think Valdes will likely be moved up to a full-season team once Extended Spring Training has concluded.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 17, 2011, 07:15:31 pm
at one time, I actually thought jay jackson might have a chance to be a pretty good pitcher in the bigs...guess he proved me wrong....i  hate when people try to prove me wrong.  :-)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 17, 2011, 07:17:50 pm
You will get used to it like Curt has.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 17, 2011, 07:21:12 pm
Randy Wells doing well so far

Peoria Chiefs
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Wells, R (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t443&t=p_pbp&pid=448694) 3.03000100.00
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 17, 2011, 07:42:06 pm
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Wells, R (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t443&t=p_pbp&pid=448694) 3.26310102.45
Kirk (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t443&t=p_pbp&pid=571853) 0.10000001.78
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2011, 08:46:22 pm
Kirk: 5-1/3 -1-0-0-0-3


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_17_qcsafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 17, 2011, 09:00:57 pm
Kirk is a guy i ,for some reason, instantly liked the moment we drafted him...just one of those hunch things....he was one of the few guys i actually asked about on the other board though no one had much scouting info on him.  I hope someone eventually does come across a recent scouting report on him as i would love to see it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2011, 09:05:04 pm
Whitenack: 7-3-0-0-2-5 , 11-2 GO/FO

LeMahieu: 3-5, 2B, 2 K

Vitters: 3-5, 2B, K



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_17_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 17, 2011, 09:25:54 pm
Keith Law's mock draft . . .

Chicago Cubs

Bubba Starling, CF, Gardner-Edgerton HS, (Gardner, Kan.)

This is still a dream scenario for the Cubs, who I've also heard are connected to Archie Bradley and George Springer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2011, 09:34:14 pm
Archie Bradley wants $20 M according to BA. I'm just guessing that leaves the Cubs out.


Somehow, Springer sounds about right for the Cubs though. If not George, then Jerry.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 17, 2011, 09:56:01 pm
Hell, hire Jerry Springer as the new GM.  Couldn't be any worse.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2011, 09:58:16 pm
Tonight's train wreck would've fit in on his show. All that was missing was the hermaphrodite cousin lovin'.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 17, 2011, 09:59:54 pm
Wasn't that what the whole Pujols/Hendry hug was about?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 17, 2011, 10:24:26 pm
Archie Bradley wants $20 M according to BA. I'm just guessing that leaves the Cubs out.


Somehow, Springer sounds about right for the Cubs though. If not George, then Jerry.

It took me a minute to get that joke.

I was about to go on the hunt for scouting reports on some dude with the last name Jerry.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 18, 2011, 08:41:36 am
Kirk is a guy i ,for some reason, instantly liked the moment we drafted him...just one of those hunch things....he was one of the few guys i actually asked about on the other board though no one had much scouting info on him.  I hope someone eventually does come across a recent scouting report on him as i would love to see it.

Really nothing I could find that was recent.... BUT....
Austin Kirk --  http://rivals.yahoo.com/highschool/baseball/recruiting/player-Austin-Kirk-60400  A 2009 page for him, but without any scouting report.

http://paramountbaseball.net/game/lgreports/news/html/players/player_27900.html  -- no narrative scouting report, but a graphic report, and an EXTREMELY strange stat page which presents what appear to be supposed 2013 stats  (it is still 2011.... right?  I mean, I haven't lost a couple of years... have I?)  According to the graphic scouting report,

Overall   Vs Left   Vs Right   Potential
Stuff   5   5   5   5
Movement   5   5   5   6
Control   4   4   4   4
Pitch Ratings
Pitch   Current   Potential
Fastball   6   6
Curveball   4   5
Changeup   5   5
       
       
Other Pitching Ratings
Velocity   92-94 Mph
Stamina   7
Suggested Role   Starter
Groundball Percentage   51 %
Hold Runners   9
Defense   4
Run/Bunt Ratings
Running Speed:   1
Stealing Ability:   1
Baserunning Inst.:   2
Sacrifice Bunt:   7
Bunt for Hit:   2
    
Personality Ratings
Leader Ability:   Very Low
Loyalty:   High
Desire f. Win:   High
Greed:   High
Intelligence:   Normal
Work Ethic:   Low


from his bio section at http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=571853    Kirk went 9-1 with a 0.45 ERA in 11 games as a high school senior, striking out 111 batters in 61 2/3 innings to lead Owasso to its 11th state championship in 13 years.

http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?topic_id=4961152&content_id=4736861   -- video of him from high school.

http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/06/10/cubs-draft-three-on-the-first-day/   -- a Draft day report --   Round 3 — Austin Kirk, LHP, Owasso High School (Okla.): Kirk had a stellar senior season for Owasso, which has ranked among the nation’s most consistent baseball programs. In early May, he threw his second no-hitter of the season, striking out 13 of 17 batters in a regional game over Jenks. Kirk went 9-1 with an 0.45 ERA on the mound and batted .408 with 50 RBIs. He worked through the winter with former Ram Cory Patton, who plays in the Blue Jays’ organization, on improving his offense. He also worked with Dallas Trahern, another former Ram who is playing in the Minor Leagues.

Did you memorize his name? Good. Because even if he’s awesome, you won’t see him again for at least three years.



http://www.mlbbonusbaby.com/2010/02/24/2010-draft-preview-chicago-cubs/  ---  3. Austin Kirk, LHP, Owasso HS (OK), #109 Overall: Kirk was a fairly finished product as a prep arm, showing a mature, durable body with average or slightly above-average stuff. He was expected to go somewhere in the late third round to fifth round, making this a solid pick. Following players selected: Josh Spence, Jonathan Meyer, A.J. Morris. Signing bonus: $320,000.   This site also has some decent analysis of the last few Cub drafts overall.... and the budgets available for them

http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextra/article.aspx?articleID=20090507_229_B1_Owasso149312&allcom=1  -- a rather generic news report on the second of Kirk's no-hitters in high school.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=kirk--001aus

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2009/06/cubsminors61109.php  Austin Kirk - LHP 6'1", 205 lbs, 19 yrs old, bats left, throws left: This kid played for a high school baseball powerhouse in Oklahoma that has produced several professional players. He posted a record of 9-1 0.45 ERA with 21 walks versus 111 K's in 62 IP. What I like about this is it does not appear the kid was abused, because he was on a good team (unlike Kerry Wood, who was the bread and butter of his team in the playoffs). Has overpowering fastball (at least on high school terms) that was clocked at 95 MPH in state semi-finals, as well as a sharp breaking ball and solid change-up. This might be a difficult sign, as he's already signed a letter of intent with the University of Oklahoma. An important note ... is he's also a good hitter too, hitting .400+ with 5 HR this year when he wasn't pitching. So, he has several things going for him ... a very polished arm, playing for a baseball powerhouse in high school, not having his arm abused, AND apparently he's a really good kid with a solid head on his shoulders. There was a 70 year old that kind of adopted the team as his own, and was a huge fan of Kirk's...It's almost like a Babe Ruth story. The guy was on his deathbed still rooting for the team, and recently passed away, and Kirk had given him his old jersey, a signed ball, and their state championship medal. When he was buried, the guy had on Kirk's jersey, the ball, and medal. It was a very heartwarming story, and I hope we can sign a kid of that type of ability AND character.

From Jim Callis last month --http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2011/2611609.html  DrewBoke (IL): What's the scouting report on Austin Kirk? He looks like he has great stuff with poor inconsistency.

Jim Callis: I haven't talked to anyone about him this year, but in the past he's had a high-80s fastball with a promising curveball. If he can command that curve, he'll be tough in the Midwest League.


And much more for anyone who subscribes to InsideTheIvey.com  http://search.scout.com/a.z?s=260&p=4&c=1&search=1&type=3&sskey=Austin+Kirk&sssiteid=260  Includes a couple of interviews with him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 18, 2011, 08:50:17 am
thanks...i believe craig posted a little bit of info last time from some scout but no where that extensive, may have been from arizona phil...suppose i could have just googled tho(edited-hope that didn't come off smart assy cuz i figure that what you did  lol).   I did think the personality ratings were interesting, never heard of that site.  I think i might have to check out those for more prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 18, 2011, 10:11:14 am
Thanks, jes.  I think that 2013 Paramount thing is some simulation game thing.  So it's basically fantasy.  It lists him at 23, so it's pretending it's 2013, it has made up stats for 2011 and 2012 (it lists him pitching relief with a 4.86 ERA at Daytona in 2011), and has him getting ejected and suspended in a brawl in 2012.  So don't take their "92-94 velocity" or any of their stuff seriously. 

I haven't gotten a lot of info on Kirk.  The  Callis thing, "in the past he's had a high-80s fastball with a promising curveball", that seems to be the take I've seen.  But, motivated maturing younger kids can get faster, and he's still only 20. 

I think there's a fairly different take on good curveball/high-80's versus good-curveball/low-90's/good control.  If we were getting told that he's really routinely throws 91-94 with sinking movement and control, then of course he looks like a really serious prospect.  If he's mostly 87-89, maybe he's Phil Norton. 

Last year my take was that he was inconsistent and I didn't think he had an exceptional fastball.  He had some big-K really jazzy days, which I assumed meant his curve was clicking, and other days when he struggled, which I assumed meant his curveball wasn't clicking and hitters were able to get some hits off of hangers and/or off of an unexceptional fastball. 

But this year, wow, 1.56 ERA with a 0.72 WHIP.  My assumption is that his curveball has been clicking and few A- hitters can handle good lefty curveballs.  But I'm guessing his fastball has also been doing fine, because nobody throws curveballs all the time.  You get a lot more outs with curveballs when hitters respect the fastball.  I'm sure we'll get some newer-version scouting sooner or later, given how well he's been pitching.  Last year he started in Mesa, and pitched in Boise.  Unless a guy has pretty standout numbers (he didn't) or standout stuff, I don't think BA gets a lot of scouts talking about guys like that.  So whatever Callis has been told, it wouldn't surprise me if it was based on one or two scouts telling him something based on one or two games last July.  Might not be very current info at all. 

But if a guy sustains a 1.5 ERA for very long, people will get more interested and talk about him more. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 18, 2011, 10:59:53 am
high loyalty and high greed personality traits would seem to be at odds with one another...unless you assume loyalty to be toward his teammates, but then if he has a high loyalty toward his team mates, i wouldn't think his leadership skills would not be rated as very low, maybe average or even low, but not very low.  I dunno...a lot of that seems to contradict other things.

actually after thinking on it, then coming back, and thinking on it some more, i can finally paint a picture of his life....he's a guy who likes to go out and party with his teammates rather than practice, but when his turn to pitch comes, he's a gamer.  And he wants to make as much money as he can so he can be loyal to his team mates and treat them to said partying
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 18, 2011, 02:15:58 pm
Heh heh.  Before I realized that it was totally fictional and made up, at first I was wondering about that too?  High greed?  Low leadership?  High loyalty?  92-94 velocity?  Where are they getting this stuff from for some low-profile 20-year-old kid who's just breaking into full-season ball? 

But your explanation ties the character together very nicely!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 18, 2011, 03:46:56 pm
BA chat:

Navin (Pasadena, CA): Lindor and Starling seem like the most popular choices for the Cubs. If they are gone at 9, who do the Cubs consider?

Jim Callis: One of the college pitchers. They drafted Sonny Gray out of high school. They have some interest in Alex Meyer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 18, 2011, 04:41:13 pm
Ha: 2-5, 2 RBI, K, CS , (2-run single to put Tenn up in the 9th)

Flaherty: 2-4, 2B, BB, K, CS

McNutt: 3-4-1-1-0-1


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_18_tenaax_cngaax_1


Iowa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 18, 2011, 06:58:52 pm
Wow, I was just checking out Ryan Flaherty's numbers and noticed that he's played LF (16 games), 2B (14) and SS (12) with just a couple games (or less) at 1B, 3B and RF.

I wish they would get him some more playing time at third base because the Cubs might have to use him there beginning next season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 18, 2011, 08:23:07 pm
Kurcz: 5 IP, 0 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_18_dbcafa_pbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 18, 2011, 08:41:19 pm
Strike, I hadn't realized Flaherty had done so little 3B, either.  I wonder if he doesn't have the quickness for it?  Or what the thinking is?  I can't really imagine that big-league SS is going to be a place where he plays any more than Mark Bellhorn. 

It's nice that he's bounced back.  I was a little worried that he had his hot start, and then he chilled and I wondered if it would stop.  But now over his last ten games he's been sustaining his .900+ OPS.  It sure would be nice if he could keep that up and be a valid big-leaguer.  I've got the hope that whatever his limits are physically, that he might not be such a dope and might not make many dumbhead mistakes. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 18, 2011, 08:50:26 pm
Strike, I hadn't realized Flaherty had done so little 3B, either.  I wonder if he doesn't have the quickness for it?  Or what the thinking is?  I can't really imagine that big-league SS is going to be a place where he plays any more than Mark Bellhorn. 

It's nice that he's bounced back.  I was a little worried that he had his hot start, and then he chilled and I wondered if it would stop.  But now over his last ten games he's been sustaining his .900+ OPS.  It sure would be nice if he could keep that up and be a valid big-leaguer.  I've got the hope that whatever his limits are physically, that he might not be such a dope and might not make many dumbhead mistakes. 



Unfortunately, he's a Cub.  It's pre-ordained.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 18, 2011, 08:57:04 pm
Don't be silly.  Craig is not a calvinist.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 18, 2011, 09:06:26 pm
Kurcz: 5 IP, 0 R

After a lousy start, Kurcz has allowed no runs in his last 16 innings, and 1 in his last 20.  Not too bad for a 20-year-old in A+. 

Dallas Beeler with another good outing, 4K/1 single/4 innings.  He's got a sub-1 ERA, not a ton of K's but not bad, few walks, and most importantly zero HR's to date.  And despite being a former surgery guy, he's still not that old, will turn 22 in June.  Very few innings thus far, so premature.  But low walks, no HR's, decent K's, and very GB-oriented.  At 6'5", he's a big guy who'd have the size/frame to throw hard.  I believe Az Phil had suggested that he was throwing in the low 90's last fall at Instrux.  So it would seem that his velocity is just fine.  Serious prospect in my book. 

Lopez, different story.  He's been lousy. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 18, 2011, 09:42:15 pm
Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_18_qcsafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2011, 12:22:19 pm
Hicks missed some time earlier this month with some injury, Chris or anybody do you know what it was?  Arm, or oblique, or the popular blister, or what? 

Hicks pitching today, 6K/0BB through four.  He's been very inconsistent in his profile thus far, but it's early.  Game one was game one; then the game before he was disabled, I wonder whether he had something wrong during that game?  Then his comeback appearance no K's.  But I'm hoping that when he's stretched out and kind of settled in, that the kind of results he's got today and had in games 2 and 3 can become more the norm than the exception. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2011, 12:25:00 pm
Szczur now hasn't played for 9 days.  I thought I'd read something about going to Villanova for graduation, but that doesn't seem like a 9-day event.  Anybody know what's up with him? 

I'd assumed it was the violence of football before that gave him some injury risks, and that was a reason to go baseball.  But if he missed most of the football season, was baseball hurt for much of this spring and couldn't run, and now again is hurt, I'm worrying a little that he's another injury-prone guy. 

Hope it's nothing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 19, 2011, 01:16:57 pm
I wonder if Szczur had to return for finals and graduation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 19, 2011, 01:26:55 pm
Bob Brenly went to Palm Beach this morning to see the Daytona Cubs in the first of a day/night doubleheader.  His son must be catching the evening game as he didn't play this morning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2011, 01:37:05 pm
I wonder if Szczur had to return for finals and graduation.

INteresting.  Graduation I could see.  But if he's been with Peoria all spring, and in camp in March already, and possibly training for the NFL combine in January until the Cubs signed him, I wouldn't have guessed he was actually taking live classes this semester that required live attendance at live finals.  But, maybe so.  Maybe he's been taking fully on-line classes that for some reason require live attendance for finals.  Or maybe he's been taking some classes that weren't fully on-line, but have hybrid teaching or he watches recorded lectures.  Sometimes those a guy can take regular tests on-line or proctored, but require the student to show up live for finals.  That would be a kind of cool explanation for his absence. 

Or maybe his leg is injured....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 19, 2011, 01:46:09 pm
Well, according to the Villanova website, the commencement ceremony was Sunday, so you would think Szczur would be back with the team by now unless the club gave him some extra personal time, which I doubt they would.

Curious.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 19, 2011, 01:49:31 pm
Bour went 5 for 5 this morning, with 2 doubles.  And Evan Crawford, who is supposed to be faster than Campana, is hitting 341.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 19, 2011, 01:52:54 pm
The Chiefs have their third 11 a.m. home start of the season to close out the three-game series with the Quad Cities River Bandits. It’s a lazy start to the day as neither team took on-field batting practice.

At least with the early start the Chiefs can get to erasing Wednesday’s loss a lot quicker. Said Chiefs manager Casey Kopitzke: “I’m happy with coming back and not sitting on a tough loss all day.”

Matt Szczur is day-to-day. He missed the weekend series at Kane County for his college graduation and is “not feeling right” according to Kopitzke.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2011, 01:55:55 pm
Bour 5-5, 3 singles and two doubles, gets his average up to .318.  Still can't get the OPS over 1.000, though.  I'd be curious to see what his hit chart might look like.  Looking at today's game recount, for example, the doubles were to center and the opposite way, as were two of the three singles.  He must be pretty disciplined about using the whole field, and I'd guess a big guy like that probably has pitchers try to keep it away quite often. 

His career K-rate has been modest for a big guy all along, but this year it's under 16%.  Guys who slug without K'ing much, those guys can be pretty valuable contributors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on May 19, 2011, 01:59:45 pm
I wouldn't go so far as to say Lopez has been lousy but i would say he has been a little bit less than what we all had hoped to have seen from him thus far
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2011, 02:33:20 pm
5HR/19K/15W/38innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on May 19, 2011, 03:15:13 pm
Matt Szczur is day-to-day. He missed the weekend series at Kane County for his college graduation and is “not feeling right” according to Kopitzke.

Hangover...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 19, 2011, 05:44:05 pm
May 19, 2011

DES MOINES, IA - Right handed pitcher Blake Parker has been called up to Triple-A Iowa today. In a corresponding move, The Chicago Cubs have announced right handed pitcher Chris Carpenter has been reassigned to Double-A Tennessee.

This will be Parker's fourth tour of duty at the triple-A level. Parker has spent time with the Iowa Cubs in each of the past three seasons. In 82 career games with Iowa, Parker has a 3-7 record with a 3.92 ERA in 103.1 innings pitched. His 24 saves with the I-Cubs rank 6th on the club's all-time list. In 16 games with Tennessee this season, Parker was 1-2 with a 4.13 ERA in 24.0 innings.

Carpenter will rejoin the Smokies, where he spent most of the 2010 season. Last year he was 8-6 with a 3.16 ERA in 23 games as a starting pitcher. This season with the Iowa Cubs, Carpenter was 2-1 with a 6.41 ERA. He has walked 17 and struck out 20 in 13 games (19.2 innings) working out of the bullpen.

Parker is expected to join the Cubs in Des Moines tonight as they begin a four-game series against the Tucson Padres.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 19, 2011, 06:22:25 pm
I wonder if the Cubs are considering moving Carpenter back to the rotation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 19, 2011, 06:42:33 pm
Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_19_qcsafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Daytona:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_19_dbcafa_pbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 19, 2011, 09:27:19 pm
Flaherty, LeMahieu, Vitters: 8-13, 2 2B, HR, 7 RBI

Beliveau: 2/3 IP, 2 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_19_mobaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Colvin: 0-4, RBI, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_19_tucaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 19, 2011, 10:23:36 pm
The failure to sell high on Tyler Colvin might become one of the biggest blunders of the Hendry era.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 20, 2011, 01:33:47 am
But when they need a closer, the Chiefs do have a hard-throwing option in Marcus Hatley, who picked up his second save of the season on Thursday.

“He throws harder than anybody on the team. He goes right at hitters and gets ahead in the count,” catcher Micah Gibbs said. “Then he has one of the best breaking balls in low-A that I’ve seen. Whenever he gets ahead of batters it’s tough to come back on him.”

Hatley, a right-hander who throws in the low to mid 90s, also adds a bit of a veteran presence to the pitching staff....

Hatley had Tommy John surgery in August of 2009 after pitching in 30 games, with 16 starts, for the Chiefs.

He returned to the Chiefs last August to pitch in seven games, after pitching in two games each at short-season Boise and rookie league Mesa.

“I was a little nervous to come back because I wasn’t sure how my arm was,” Hatley said. “You never know until you get back into a game.”

Hatley started those games as a way to control his pitch count. This year he’s been pitching exclusively out of the pen in the ninth inning. Only two of his 11 appearances have been longer than one inning.

But because of Peoria’s piggyback rotation — three of five days in the rotation the Chiefs use a scheduled reliever to throw as many as five innings — Hatley has just four save chances. Plus, eight wins have been by four or more runs.

Hatley says there’s not much difference in how he approaches his outings based on if it’s a save situation or not.

“I try not to. I just try to get ahead of guys and put them away,” Hatley said. “I just have to stay on top of myself and get outs.”

....

“It’s nice having that kind of velocity at the end of the game, but there’s some things he still needs to learn,” Peoria pitching coach Jeff Fassero said. “He gets a little over-amped trying to throw the ball. If he gets it figured out I think he’ll be good.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 20, 2011, 10:02:17 am
I'm fickle, so with Flaherty, Vitters, and Bour coming off good days, I'm feeling hopeful.  The Cubs have some depth/flexibility/competition at positions.

SS:  Castro, Barney
2B:  Barney, Lemahieu, Flaherty (L)
3B:  Vitters, Lemahieu (Flaherty might be able to switch there too, although he's played only one game at 3B this year)
1B:  Vitters, Bour (L)
CF/OF:  Jackson (L), Ha, Szczur, Flaherty, Colvin
C:  Soto, Clevenger, Castillo, Gibbs (S)

Listed differently: Barney, Lemahieu, Flaherty, Vitters, Bour, Ha, Jackson, and Szczur provide eight prospects that, along with Castro, could be flexibly rearranged (in a lot of different ways) to address the six non-Castro positions. 

In a perfect world, those eight guys would effectively cover all six of those spots, and provide good hitting.  That's probably wishing for too much, and guessing which will and won't work out, that's not so easy.  But I don't think it would be absurd to hope that four spots might get covered with varying degrees of adequacy. 

1.  It's not all projection to imagine Barney being excellent defensively and not being overmatched. 

2.  Lemahieu seems a pretty safe bet to make it.  What position, how good he'll end up I'm not sure.  But he's 22, hitting .350+, and he's been a consistent .300 hitter.  So it's a safe projection that he'll hit for average in the majors.  Whether the power will be enough or the average be high enough to be an asset regular is a question, but he's pretty safe to be at least decent.

3.  Ha seems another very safe prospect.  A pure natural contact hitter, it's pretty safe to project that he'll hit for average too.  And with his excellent defense/throwing, he'll be a defensive asset in a corner even if he doesn't stay in center.  How much power he'll end up with and how well he'll hit is never certain, but again he seems pretty safe to be at least decent.

The others aren't as safe, IMO.
4.  Jackson has holes and the K's/average problem, so there are risks.  But his tools are well regarded, a lot of scouts like him, so it's not a huge reach to imagine him being a servicable big-league regular OFer. Perhaps someday an asset regular, if he can show enough power and keep his average floatable. 

5.  Flaherty hasn't been consistent.  But I think he's a critical hinge guy.  IF he really could hit well and hit with power, that would provide an important LH bat.  His defense isn't great anywhere, but he seems a very reliable, low-error guy.  2b?  3B?  Lf?  1b?  If he worked out as a hitter, Flaherty/Lemahieu/Castro and perhaps even Vitters might provide capable coverage of 2B/3B. 

6.  Szczur.  I admit I'm awfully interested.  A long way to go.  But obviously I'm a believer in pure contact hitters.  So I think that for a low-A guy, he's a relatively low-risk prospect in terms of future average.  The base-stealing speed could be really fun.  And that kind of speed could be pretty useful defensively if he ends up in LF rather than center.  But it's also feasible to envision a super rangy OF with Szczur in center, Jackson in left, and Ha in right, for example. 

7.  Vitters.  Both the hacker, the low OBP, the defense, the limited HR output, and the head issues make him a shaky prospect.  But he's got a gift for contact hitting and some potential for at least some HR power.  There's still a chance...

8.  Bour.  Ultra-low-profile prospect.  His defense, athleticism, and ability to handle more advance pitching are totally unknown to me.  But as a huge guy with power who can also handle the bat and take walks, he's in a different place from Dubois and Brandon Sing and Harvey and Dopirak.  If he continues to hit HR without K'ing, he stays on my watch list.  We've never actually hit on one of these types of guys, but having a middle-of-the-order slugger changes a franchise. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 20, 2011, 10:17:07 am
Other randoms:
1.  My list above shows guys who could be players and fill spots.  As JR has noted, though, there is a serious lack of star power.  Several of these guys might work out to be capable major leaguers.  But they might also become the kind of collection that wins 75 games, not the kinds of guys who are the best players on a 95-win team. 

2.  We've had our share of failed prospects, but to some degree I think that many of these guys are safer because so many are contact hitters.  Corey, Kelton, Choi, Harvey, Pie, so many of our top star-power high-ceiling prospects were K-oriented guys with contact problems, had problems with breaking balls.  As we've seen, projecting a K-guy to figure out breaking balls is a risky bet.  But so many of our current prospects are NOT K-guys with breaking-ball problems.  Easier to see them translating their existing games up.  Even if most haven't shown the current HR power or walk rates that we'd like.  I think it's somewhat safer to project some modest growth in  HR output than major reduction in K-contract problems. 

3.  Vitters is a huge exception.  And I'm not sure what Lemahieu would score on a wonderlic.   And maybe when I'll see them I'll change my mind.  But it seems to me that many of the current prospects seem like both reasonably smart and reasonably hard-working high-effort guys.  Flaherty seems pretty intelligent (Vandy, dad is a coach...); Jackson is very smart and seems a high energy player; Szczur is supposed to be a really gung ho involved player; Ha seems to have "it"; Barney of course is very alert and smart.  No idea on Bour, Vitters of course seems like a space cadet, and I'm not sure whether Lemahieu is much of an energy guy.  But it's my hope that a bunch of these guys will seem more alert, energized, and smart than has often been the Cub scene in recent years.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 20, 2011, 11:09:41 am
Thanks for your thoughts, Craig.   Useful fodder for thought.


Obviously, as you indicated, one never knows how prospects are going to turn out.  But your comments are, as usual, thoughtful and, in this case, somewhat encouraging.


As to the HR power issue, Wilken (along with other baseball people, I believe) has observed that power is something that certain players can and are likely to develop over time.  Sandberg is an obvious Cub example.  The other consideration is that there just aren't that many true HR hitters these days, with the steroids era over (or at least somewhat abated).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 20, 2011, 11:30:22 am
...As to the HR power issue, Wilken (along with other baseball people, I believe) has observed that power is something that certain players can and are likely to develop over time.  ....The other consideration is that there just aren't that many true HR hitters these days, with the steroids era over (or at least somewhat abated).

Yes, I totally agree.  We tend to dismiss most of our hitting prospects as "low ceiling" because they don't project to hit 30 HR's.  But in the current era, few guys do.  Which is why I think we may undervalue some of our prospects, I think.  (Lemahieu may not need to hit 20 HR's to be an asset bat even at 3b.  Szczur might be a value in *LF* even if he never hits 15 HR's ...)

And since power does develop, it seems much safer to start with a pure contact hitter than with a BP-power guy who struggles to make game contact.  More likely that the contact hitter will develop some power than that the K-guy will learn to hit. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 20, 2011, 11:42:49 am
Szczur hasn't hit a homer in over 200 professional at-bats. And he's almost 22; not a HS kid. He doesn't hit many doubles either.

Right now his numbers look eerily like Juan Pierre's, minus the triples.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 20, 2011, 11:47:51 am
i like that the Cubs brass seem to be heading toward more pure hitters hoping they develop power, rather than taking super athletic power hitters hoping they learn how to hit the ball.  Wilken's influence?  Someone who can hit for average, even if he lacks power, might still can be a useful cheap piece at the major league level, allowing them to allocate financial assets elsewhere, whereas, a guy who can hit the ball a mile in bp but can't put the bat on the ball in a game is useless at the major league level.  And, as Craig said, you never know when those pure hitters might develop power.  For some reason, i'm having visions of Kansas City offensively.  As much as I used to get excited over the super athletic, tools guys, i'm glad they're now going this route.

I've always enjoyed your posts, craig.  There are a couple of guys here whose opinions i've grown to respect greatly over the last decade, and you are one of them, because it seemed whatever you posted, it so thoroughly echoed my own thoughts.  I was glad you moved.  I'm trying to recall tho, have you ever actually debated anyone?  lol
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 20, 2011, 11:54:07 am
Craig is a chemistry professor.

There is no crying in baseball.

There is no debating in chemistry.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 20, 2011, 11:54:55 am
(Lemahieu may not need to hit 20 HR's to be an asset bat even at 3b.)

I don't think so either.  Alex Rodriguez is second in the majors in 3B OPS at just .833, and there are only 5 major league third basemen with OPS's over .800. 

.280-.300 and 15 HR's a year from someone like LeMahieu at 3B would be more than respectable I think. 

When I think of LeMahieu, I'm starting to think of someone like Joe Randa.  Relatively decent K's, decent power, pretty good average.  I think a lot of teams would be happy with Joe Randa in his prime playing 3B for them right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 20, 2011, 12:01:46 pm
I think that's part of the reason why I want us to quit fooling around with Vitters at 3B and start playing LeMahieu (or Flaherty) there regularly. 

We have a couple of guys who have the potential to put up respectable, albeit not great, numbers at 3B in the majors with LeMahieu and Flaherty, and 3B is going to be a need position for us soon it looks like.  Those guys need to start getting regular experience there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 20, 2011, 12:19:03 pm
Yes, Szczur's the least HR-projectible (other than Barney, of course.)  But I think Lemahieu, Vitters, and Jackson, it's more plausible that their HR output will look less limiting at age 28 than it does now. 

And I admit I still have some power hopes for Szczur.  200 AB is not that many, and I think he's new enough to be focusing on just getting settled in before drastically reworking his swing.  So perhaps down the road, a guy who has contact skill to start with can adapt his swing somewhat, or perhaps situationally, and get a little bit better in the power department.   

Quote
Right now his numbers look eerily like Juan Pierre's, minus the triples.

There is one major difference in Szczur's early numbers:  he walks, and that changes his OBP. 


Juan Pierre as a .330-OBP guy isn't an asset.  But I think the .361, .374, .378 OBP guy that Pierre was during three Marlins years **was** an asset. 


If Szczur walks enough to consistently OBP at .360+, I don't think that would be so eerie.     


I think that a .380-OBP base-stealing leadoff man could be a real asset in today's scoring-challenged game.  And that such a player combined with exceptional defensive range might perhaps be an asset even if used in left field rather than center. 


Obviously lots of wishing and dreaming.  But I admit I don't ever remember having a leadoff guy who both was an OBP-machine and who actually had meaningful base-stealing speed, and was a defensive asset at his position. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 20, 2011, 12:42:50 pm
3.  Vitters is a huge exception.  And I'm not sure what Lemahieu would score on a wonderlic.   And maybe when I'll see them I'll change my mind.  But it seems to me that many of the current prospects seem like both reasonably smart and reasonably hard-working high-effort guys.  Flaherty seems pretty intelligent (Vandy, dad is a coach...); Jackson is very smart and seems a high energy player; Szczur is supposed to be a really gung ho involved player; Ha seems to have "it"; Barney of course is very alert and smart.  No idea on Bour, Vitters of course seems like a space cadet, and I'm not sure whether Lemahieu is much of an energy guy.  But it's my hope that a bunch of these guys will seem more alert, energized, and smart than has often been the Cub scene in recent years.   

Some of the rocks in my driveway are more alert, energized and smart than some of our overpaid veterans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 20, 2011, 12:44:09 pm
Sporadic good leadoff guys here and there, I suppose.

In '84, as late as August 8, Dernier had a .400 OBP (and was batting .323).  He fell out of the top 10 in BA near Labor Day.  Ended up at .356 OBP, but a lot of the drop was when Cubs were already in command of the division.  He stole 45 and was subperb in CF.  I guess kind of a fluke year, but a really nice year. 

Lofton too a bunch of years later, for a time.  It would be nice to have a young guy on the Cubs who could do that for a bunch of seasons.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 20, 2011, 02:03:26 pm
I guess the conventional wisdom these days is that small ball, speed and defense are what should be emphasized.  The Cubs haven't exactly excelled in those qualities since I've been a fan, but I really do like that kind of baseball.  It would be a welcome change if some of those prospects turn out to be skilled defensively, get on base a lot, run well and be fundamentally sound.  Barney seems like  that kind of player, and I've really become fond of him.  I hope he is able to maintain his approach and performance over the long haul.





Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 20, 2011, 02:41:52 pm
Ron, I agree re Barney (and his approach) being really fun to watch! 

Let's do hope he can sustain anything close to what he's done and that we have more guys like him coming down the road a bit!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 20, 2011, 02:56:49 pm
I guess the conventional wisdom these days is that small ball, speed and defense are what should be emphasized.  The Cubs haven't exactly excelled in those qualities since I've been a fan, but I really do like that kind of baseball.  It would be a welcome change if some of those prospects turn out to be skilled defensively, get on base a lot, run well and be fundamentally sound.  Barney seems like  that kind of player, and I've really become fond of him.  I hope he is able to maintain his approach and performance over the long haul.

It's fun to watch well played baseball, and exciting defensive plays and stolen bases are fun to watch, etc.. 

But the HR is still a most efficient way to score runs, and remains a huge part of offense.  A double is still a way more efficient way to get to 2b than bunting, having the next batter take pitches and get in a hole, and then occasionally actually steal 2B while sometimes getting thrown out. 

A good team is able to defend and hit with some power and play alert and sometimes have some good baserunners besides.  The Cubs have too often lacked a multi-function lineup.  Too many guys who might be good at something but were bad at some things.  I'd certainly like to see much more balance. 

So not everybody has to hit 20+ HR's to be valuable overall.  But you better get a decent fraction of your regulars who hit with some power. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 20, 2011, 03:17:09 pm
I agree, Craig.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 20, 2011, 05:19:35 pm
No better example that Reed Johnson's 2-run homer Wednesday night.  Cubs give up the lead and then, with two outs top of the next inning, a single and Reed's homer---boom, tie game.  That turned the whole game around in a blink.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 20, 2011, 05:36:12 pm
I think Barney has played better than anyone could've expected and his defense at 2nd is, maybe, gold glove caliber. However, he has no power, almost never walks, and doesn't steal bases. What's made him helpful is an extremely high and almost certainly unsustainable batting average. I don't know if a Jose Lind type player will work, even with offensive production down everywhere.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 20, 2011, 05:41:49 pm
Barney will seldom be an All Star or a .300 hitter or whatever, but if he can hit .260+ and provide solid defense, he can eliminate one of the eight starting spots allowing a decent GM to fill with two or three stars other places.  It's the decent GM part that's going to be tough.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 20, 2011, 05:44:44 pm
Curt, if he hits .260, he's going to be more useless offensively than Theriot and will have to hit 8th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 20, 2011, 05:47:05 pm
Gosh, when I posted I could have sworn I put a + sign after that.  But even then I disagree.  Teams have guys hitting at the Mendoza line and winning championships.  And if it's that bad and we have that many better hitters and he moves to 8th, that means we're getting decent...I'm not holding my breath.

All I'm saying is that not being a black hole so that the GM can concentrate on other spots is a big contribution.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 20, 2011, 05:50:09 pm
I agree with Chris...anything less than .290 from Barney, and he's pretty useless with the bat. 

I think it was JR who suggested Mark Grudzielanek as a comparable player a couple weeks ago.  Grudzielanek's minor league numbers (.279/.328/.380) weren't far off from Barney's (.286/.334/.374).  In fact, the OPSes were identical with very minor differences in OBP and SLG.  If Barney can have Grudzielanek's career, his defense is good enough that he's pretty valuable until he gets expensive. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 20, 2011, 06:16:52 pm
And you're not going to get a .290 hitter at every position.  You're in la-la land.  Morons like you would have traded Bill Mazeroski and Nellie Fox.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 20, 2011, 06:19:48 pm
Before my position gets distorted further, I don't know if Barney is going to be a big leaguer for two months or twenty years.  I'm just saying that's he's playing enough smart ball, doing a decent job defensively, and hitting enough that we don't have to go trading the farm for an All Star.  Fill the other holes.  There are lots of them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 20, 2011, 06:25:56 pm
I don't need a .290 hitter at every position.  I just need players who don't walk or hit for power to hit .290. 

I think I mostly agree with you...it would be nice if we could stick Barney at 2B for 3-4 years and spend the money somewhere else.  I just think we have a different definition of what "not being a black hole" is when it comes to Barney. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 20, 2011, 06:28:38 pm
Don't agree with me.  I'm trying to get someone to put me on Ignore!  Damb.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 20, 2011, 06:53:28 pm
Who said that?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 20, 2011, 07:19:24 pm
Matthew Spencer has a pair of two-run homers his first two times up for the Smokies.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 20, 2011, 07:56:25 pm
After hitting two two-run homers, Matthew Spencer was hit by a pitch his next time up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 20, 2011, 08:31:03 pm
Following Spencer's HBP, Smokies Manager Brian Harper was ejected by HP umpire Sean Barber.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 20, 2011, 08:40:46 pm
Iowa Cubs
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Ortiz, Ra (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=150009) 5.09651814.34
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 20, 2011, 09:06:36 pm
Spencer - RBI single in the seventh.  6-5 Smokies after eight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 20, 2011, 09:12:06 pm
And you're not going to get a .290 hitter at every position.  You're in la-la land.  Morons like you would have traded Bill Mazeroski and Nellie Fox.

Nice point about Mazeroski and Fox.  There are, I'm sure, lots of other examples of extremely valuable middle infielders who never hit for a high average, walked a lot or hit with power.

Count me as a Barney fan.  We'll see how well he does over the long haul, but I really like him a lot as a player.  Obviously you don't want only guys like him, but guys like him can be terribly important role players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 20, 2011, 09:47:14 pm
Actually, Ron, I was seeing if I could get br or Chris to put me on Ignore, hence my "morons."  I are a failure.

Seriously, I think you build a team.   Until we can get a few stars to build around, it's nice that one or two positions are adequately covered.  Hopefully, Barney is one of those reliable patches.

I just hope he doesn't hit .271 or .261 these first couple years, we'll trade him for sure.  No decent 2B would have those averages.  Unless, of course, his name was Sandberg.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on May 20, 2011, 10:26:28 pm
It would be nice to see McNutt go on a hot streak and get called up mid-season.  He couldn't do any worse than crap the Cubs are throwing out there in the 4 and 5 spots now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 20, 2011, 10:54:08 pm
Barney plays solid defense, runs the bases well and hustles. He appears to have some knowledge of the strike zone. I doubt that he'll ever hit HR's in double digits, go to an All-Star game or make a third of what we're paying Soriano. But he's clearly been one of the Cubs' best players so far this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 20, 2011, 11:13:20 pm
I agree with Chris and br, nobody came close to saying everybody has to hit .290 to be useful.  But when you have almost zero IsoD and IsoP, you better have a pretty high average.  When Barney's hitting .325 or whatever this year, his OBP of .340 is more than satisfactory.  But if he's hitting .270 with a .290 OBP and singles only, he'll be a big liability offensively. 

The .290 guideline that br suggested (I think) is pretty much what I was thinking too.  Anything below .280 and he's going to be a pretty big liability offensively. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 20, 2011, 11:47:03 pm
Flaherty: 2-3, BB, 2 E

Vitters: 0-4, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_20_mobaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Clevenger: 4-5, 2B, HR, 3 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_20_tucaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Hatley: 1-1-0-0-0-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_20_cliafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Struck: 5-3-1-0-1-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_20_dbcafa_pbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 21, 2011, 12:48:17 am
Count me as a fan of Darwin Barney's play so far this season.

Also, count me as someone that thinks he needs to hit for a high average to be a starter for the Cubs.  If he falls below a line of .280/.300/.325 his spot in the lineup should go to a platoon of Blake DeWitt and Jeff Baker because numbers like that are unacceptable no matter how good his defense is.

I'm really rooting for Barney to keep up the good work and for him to hit lots more doubles.  You can see in his approach that he's trying to get more extra base hits mixed in with all the singles.  The double he had tonight that bounced into the stands was 100% by design.  He's trying to hit those soft liners down the right field line into the corner for doubles and/or triples.

He's a player that has accepted his limitations.   He knows he's never going to hit 20 homers.  If he could manage somewhere between 20-30 doubles, I think that would be good for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 21, 2011, 06:06:11 am
I agree with Chris and br, nobody came close to saying everybody has to hit .290 to be useful.  But when you have almost zero IsoD and IsoP, you better have a pretty high average.  When Barney's hitting .325 or whatever this year, his OBP of .340 is more than satisfactory.  But if he's hitting .270 with a .290 OBP and singles only, he'll be a big liability offensively. 

The .290 guideline that br suggested (I think) is pretty much what I was thinking too.  Anything below .280 and he's going to be a pretty big liability offensively. 

This is exactly why I thought that Curt's reference to Mazerowski and Fox was so relevant.

Mazerowski had a career OBP of .299, and he was never much over .300.   His career OPS was .688! Fox did much better, with a career .344 OBP, but his OPS was a measley .710.  That didn't keep either from being very valuable players on their teams.  Mazerowski was an All-Star 7 times, Fox was 12 times.  Fox was MVP one year.

Another well known 2B, Bobby Richardson, had a career .299 OBP,  and .633 OPS.  He was an All-Star seven times.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 21, 2011, 07:28:20 am
This is exactly why I thought that Curt's reference to Mazerowski and Fox was so relevant.

Mazerowski had a career OBP of .299, and he was never much over .300.   His career OPS was .688! Fox did much better, with a career .344 OBP, but his OPS was a measley .710.  That didn't keep either from being very valuable players on their teams.  Mazerowski was an All-Star 7 times, Fox was 12 times.  Fox was MVP one year.

Another well known 2B, Bobby Richardson, had a career .299 OBP,  and .633 OPS.  He was an All-Star seven times.

The whole point was and still is, having players who aren't black holes, allows you to spend more on other spots.  You can't win championships with 9 Mazeroski's.  But unless you're the 70's Cincy Reds, you can't have a great or emerging star at every spot.  It doesn't happen that often. 

Barney is one of those players...if he maintains close to current play...that looks much better playing next to a Pujols than a Pena.  Try wrapping your brain around that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 21, 2011, 07:55:53 am
I think that baseball "smarts" is a quality that is poorly represented in stats but is extremely valuable.  A player with limited offensive ability-  but who consistently makes good decisions on the bases, gets down sac bunts, hits to the right side when appropriate, gets runners home from 3B and less than two outs- can still be an asset.  Particularly if he's a solid defensive player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 21, 2011, 11:33:31 am
Clevenger has had no problem with his promotion to AAA.  His HR yesterday matches his career high with 5. 

Kind of this year's version of Chirinos, although Clevenger isn't quite as old as Chirinos was.  And being a LH bat helps Clevenger's shot at being a 2nd catcher.  Clevenger has always been a good contact hitter (.311 career hitter, that's pretty good), and has been a consistent solid OBP (.371 OBP career) and low-K guy (11% career.)  I suspect those contact/OBP skills would translate up reasonably safely.  (I'm not saying he'd hit .300 BA/.370 OBP, but that he's not going to hit .240BA/.270OBP over time.) 

I wish the club was a little more buzzed about his defense. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 21, 2011, 12:13:11 pm
There was a substantial difference in the kind of baseball it took to win when Mazerowski and Fox were playing.  The mound was substantially higher at that time, and as a result, scoring was substantially less.  If you could score 3 runs in a game, you had a decent chance to win.  So defense became a major part of the game.  The Orioles could live with a Mark Belanger 210 BA bacause he kept scoring in check.  They got good value from Paul Blair because of his defense.

Defense is still important, but no ML team could live with either player as a regular today.  If a player isn't good offensively, he isn't going to be used much on a good team, with the rare exceptions of the teams that are so good offensively that they can afford the luxury of such a player.

Mazerowski, who some consider to be the best defensive second baseman in history, would be considered a second rate player on the few teams that would play him regularly.

The same thing goes for speed.  Maury Wills, the first really prolific base stealer in modern times, would have a hard time making most teams with his 661 lifetime OPS. 

Speed and defense have been relegated to assets secondary to a player with high slugging/OPS.  Defense and speed made a good hitter like Sandberg a great player.  But it can't make a bad hitter like Dwayne Bacon good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 21, 2011, 12:20:45 pm
I certainly agree that the game has changed and that defensive, Punch and Judy players are not as valued now as they were in those days.  To a point.


  I also think that middle infielders who are really good defensively and do other little things well, even without particularly high OBP or OPS are too often undervalued.  But I think that may be changing, somewhat, with defense and speed being more highly valued than they were a few years ago.


I don't necessarily agree that Mazerowski and Fox would not be regulars today.  Would Ozzie Smith be a regular (.666 career OPS)?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 21, 2011, 12:21:59 pm
The whole point was and still is, having players who aren't black holes, allows you to spend more on other spots.  You can't win championships with 9 Mazeroski's.  But unless you're the 70's Cincy Reds, you can't have a great or emerging star at every spot.  It doesn't happen that often. 

Barney is one of those players...if he maintains close to current play...that looks much better playing next to a Pujols than a Pena.  Try wrapping your brain around that.

I think this point is well taken.  We aren't going to have a great or emerging star at every spot.  If Barney could consistently play gold-glovish defense, support a .320+ OBP, and play smart, it frees the GM to focus attention an dollars and trade chips elsewhere.  There is considerable value in that.  He can perhaps be a capable complementary player. 

I completely agree that a capable support player looks a lot nicer when he's supporting stars.  Bobby Richardson had Maris, Mantle, Bill Skowron, Elston Howard, Yogi Berra around him.  When you've got plenty of HR's elsewhere, it's fine to have a no-power small-ball guy.  Barney has Byrd and Soriano. 

Which I guess brings me back to points that reb and JR have articulated, the need to have some stars in the middle of the order. 

Ron, you mentioned OPS for Fox and Maz. I'd think that for a defender like Barney, if he can keep his OPS above .700, I think that's fine, safe, and excellent.  If he settles as a .725 OPS guy, nobody will push to replace him.  And he's probably fairly safe in the .680-.720 OPS range.  But if puts in an extended stretch or a season as a .650 guy, that will be different. 

I think the points that Chris, br, and I share are that unless he adds walks or some power, his OBP and OPS are vulnerable.  His currrent iso's (IsoD .025 and IsoP .083) sum to .108.  With a .318 BA, that gives a terrific .745 OPS and .343 OBP.  Nice.  But with a .280 batting average those iso's would give a .668 OPS, and a .265 average with his current isos give a .638 OPS. 

That's kind of why I think either he'll need to improve his iso's, or else he'll need to hit .290 or at least .280 to remain a solid guy.  If his OPS is equilibrating at .670 or below, I just think fans will and management will need to look around for an upgrade. 

I think it's entirely feasible that he WILL be able to consistently hit in the .290 range, or better. He doesn't K, he hit .299 at Iowa last year, and he hit .317 for Tennessee the year before, and he's a little stronger now.  So I'm optimistic that the level of offense he's providing is not that flukish. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 21, 2011, 12:32:28 pm
It's perfectly appropriate to worry a bit over whether Barney will continue hit well enough to be valuable as a regular 2B.  We would all prefer a Ryne Sandberg there, to be sure.


I think what Curt and I have both been emphasizing is that so long as he plays anywhere near the range he's been in, he's a very valuable player.  In my view, anyway, he'd need to regress a fair amount to dip down to the point of not being acceptable.


And I totally agree that there need to be some "star" type players around which the team is built.  The fact that the Cubs haven't developed any (besides pitchers) during the entire Hendry era is a legitimate criticism, I think.  It remains to be seen whether Wilkin will have made a difference in that area.  Castro certainly has the potential to be a star.  Whether any of the other youngsters do or not, I have no idea.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 21, 2011, 12:41:45 pm
Second base is one of the least-worrisome positions on the team at the moment, yet we're are talking about Barney. I'm far more concerned about 1B, 3B, LF, CF, RF and C than our middle infielders. Yes, Barney needs to keep hitting and Castro needs to polish his defense. We're probably going to say goodbye (and in my case, good riddance) to ARam, Fuku, Pena and Byrd on the last day of the regular season, although I wouldn't mind re-signing Fukudome for a more reasonable salary. Soriano will be back unless ownership decides to bite the bullet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 21, 2011, 01:17:24 pm
Second base is one of the least-worrisome positions on the team at the moment, yet we're are talking about Barney. I'm far more concerned about 1B, 3B, LF, CF, RF and C than our middle infielders. Yes, Barney needs to keep hitting and Castro needs to polish his defense. We're probably going to say goodbye (and in my case, good riddance) to ARam, Fuku, Pena and Byrd on the last day of the regular season, although I wouldn't mind re-signing Fukudome for a more reasonable salary. Soriano will be back unless ownership decides to bite the bullet.

This is the second reference recently to Byrd being gone after this year. I'm pretty sure his contract is through 2012 though.  Is there an assumption that the Cubs will trade him to make room for someone else?  Assuming Brett Jackson is ready to be a regular by next year, there is already one outfield spot opening up with Fukudome's presumed departure.  Unless Colvin makes a huge turnaround this year, I doubt Byrd will be going anywhere next year.

I too hope that Ramirez is not brought back, although I have no idea who they'll put at 3B if he doesn't come back. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 21, 2011, 01:24:53 pm
Ozzie Smith hit 258. 211,230, 222, 243 and 257 in his first 6 years in the league.  He would have been released well before his BA soared to 276.

It's just a different ball game.  I agree with those who are saying that things are starting to swing the other way.  Defense and speed are going to play a larger part in the future for most teams.  As in all things, it will take the Cubs and their fans a little bit longer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 21, 2011, 01:27:30 pm
Ozzie Smith hit 258. 211,230, 222, 243 and 257 in his first 6 years in the league.  He would have been released well before his BA soared to 276.

It's just a different ball game.  I agree with those who are saying that things are starting to swing the other way.  Defense and speed are going to play a larger part in the future for most teams.  As in all things, it will take the Cubs and their fans a little bit longer.
The Cub organization will figure it out right about the time when the next home run era begins.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 21, 2011, 01:38:35 pm
Cubsin, I took it that we were all talking about Barney because he's the 1/24th of the team that ain't downright depressing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on May 21, 2011, 02:00:31 pm
I went to the Smokies game last night.

Josh Vitters really isnt worth a dime.

Im just being honest.

That's why Im not crunk about ever taking a high school kid in the first round.

Vitters was supposed to be damn near a cant miss prospect.

I saw Chris Carpenter hitting 97-98-99 regularly.

He's gonna be a real good reliever and that's where I'd leave him.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 21, 2011, 02:05:09 pm
Heh heh.  Yes, Barney is under discussion because he *might* be a long-term regular.   

There is no such possibility for Aram, Soriano, or Pena.  But certainly we have had plenty of discussions whether Vitters might capably replace Aram or Pena, or Bour, or Lemahieu, or Flaherty. 

Ron, I agree with your point on Byrd.  He's under a guaranteed contract for next year, so he's got a good chance to be back.  And he's hitting .308, so it's hardly like he's having a bad year.  Another case of a support player who's doing what he's supposed to do and what he's paid to do.  If he was batting 2nd or 7th with some stars hitting 3rd-6th, who'd be fussing about Byrd?  It's not his fault that he's a high-average hitter with a good OBP who's been stuck batting 3rd because the organization hasn't been able to come up with power hitters who belong there. 

And while Jackson might be given a job next year, and hopefully will improve and respond well and work out and next year will be a rebuilding year anyway, I think it's premature to assume that Jackson is prepared to be a good regular major leaguer right now, or next April. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 21, 2011, 02:11:52 pm
There is no such possibility for Aram, Soriano, or Pena.  But certainly we have had plenty of discussions whether Vitters might capably replace Aram or Pena, or Bour, or Lemahieu, or Flaherty. 

I'm pretty sure Vitters could capably replace Bour. Otherwise, I'm not so sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 21, 2011, 03:00:19 pm
Thanks for the Josh Vitters and Chris Carpenter reports, Jiggs.

As far as Marlon Byrd goes, maybe some team will lose their center fielder and trade for him.

That will free up even more 2012 money.

(cue Deeg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 21, 2011, 06:49:49 pm
Lake has two stolen bases today, bringing him up to 16.  His BA is now over 300.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 21, 2011, 07:49:39 pm
I went to the Smokies game last night.   Josh Vitters really isnt worth a dime.
...
I saw Chris Carpenter hitting 97-98-99 regularly.  He's gonna be a real good reliever and that's where I'd leave him.

Thanks for input, jigs. 

Q's, if you can share any thoughts:

1.  How Flaherty has mostly split his time this spring between left, 2B, and SS.  Does he look like he could play 2b, really?  And any SS at all?  Or does he look too big and slow and rangeless, and the middle infield stuff is just what they do in the minors, but he's got no chance to play 2B in the majors?  Also, any thoughts on how he might look at 3B, defensively?    I guess if you had any thoughts on how he projects as a major-league hitter, that would be great to hear, too. 

2.  How about Lemahieu, any observations on how awful or OK he looks at 2B or 3B?  I'd love to have him make it at 2B, given his bat. 

3.  On Carpenter, it's fun that he can throw 98 or whatever.  But it seems like while he's really fast, he's really wild (20 walks in 21 innings), but he's still really hittable (21 hits in 21 innings).  2.0 WHIP.  Why can't he get anybody out if he's so fast?  Just high straight whackable fastball s, or what? 

4.  More defense:  Marwin Gonzalez, is he big-league defensively?  Barney caliber?  Or not that good. 
Is Ridling a pokey unathletic slug?  Or is he fine at 1B?  Do you think he has any chance to be a major leaguer?
Ditto for Spencer.  Would he be like a Soriano defensively?  Or might he be OK defensively, and if he hit enough he might be a major leaguer? 

Thanks. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 21, 2011, 08:11:45 pm
Lemahieu: 2-5, 3B, RBI

Flaherty: 2-4, 2B, 3 RBI, BB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_21_mobaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 21, 2011, 08:20:20 pm
Lemahieu: 2-5, 3B, RBI

Flaherty: 2-4, 2B, 3 RBI, BB, K

If both of those dudes can handle third base defensively, I wonder if the Cubs would consider platooning them next season.

No, Jes, that's not a "rebuilding" post.

Considering the offensive production around the Majors at third this season (or lack thereof) a Flaherty/LeMahieu platoon might give the Cubs an anti-awful cheap #8 hitter combination in 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 21, 2011, 08:28:43 pm
Rhee: 4-1/3 IP, 0 R


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_21_dbcafa_pbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 21, 2011, 08:56:23 pm
Belivieu has 9 walks in 26 innings.  34K/26IP/9W/1HR, that works.  He's always been the super-K guy, and he's always been hard to hit, but his walk rates have been kinda scary.  But those seem to be incrementally getting more manageable. 

I think if he can stay pretty effective and under control at AA this year, that he'll deserve some consideration for the big-league team next year in the post-Grabow era. 

I know it will shock you, but my guess is that he might actually be better than James Russell right now. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 21, 2011, 10:22:38 pm
Simpson: 4-2/3 -3-3-3-3-5, HR, 2 WP

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_21_cliafx_peoafx_1

Clevenger: 2-2, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_21_tucaaa_iowaaa_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 22, 2011, 10:46:35 am
Any word on Sczur?  How come he hasn't been playing?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 22, 2011, 11:17:28 am
Szczur suggests on his Twitter account that he has the flu.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 22, 2011, 12:24:49 pm
If Byrd is DL'd 10 days on the concussion list, they ought to bring up Montanez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2011, 01:11:39 pm
  1B Bryan LaHair was 2-for-3 with a double, an RBI, and scored a run last night.  LaHair has hit safely in four straight games and 10 of his last 11.  He has scored a run in nine of his last 11 games and recorded an RBI in seven of 11.  During this stretch, he is batting .477 (21-for-44) with five doubles, six home runs, 15 runs scored, and 15 RBI.  He ranks fifth in the league with a .373 batting average.


LaHair is not in the Iowa lineup this afternoon (behind Randy Wells).  Scott Moore is at first.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2011, 01:27:38 pm
 Randy Wells gave up a2-run HR to Anthony Rizzo in the top of 1st. Wells gave up 2 hits, no walks and threw 15 pitches, 12 for strikes in 1st.


It won't be long before the Padres call up Rizzo.  He has been most of the Tucson offense so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 22, 2011, 01:31:19 pm
Randy Wells gave up a 2-run HR to Anthony Rizzo in the top of 1st.

Sounds like Wells is ready.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2011, 02:19:32 pm
After doing well in the second and third, Randy Wells had a rough fourth inning

PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Wells, R (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=448694) 4.067633113.50
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2011, 04:32:45 pm
Iowa Cubs
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Wells, R (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=448694) (L, 0-1)4.067633113.50
Diamond, T (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=435080) 4.04553209.57
Stevens (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=459999) 1.034421011.32
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 22, 2011, 04:46:33 pm
That Diamond guy had the best ERA, bring 'm up!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 22, 2011, 05:27:12 pm
LeMahieu is now leading SL in batting average and Flaherty leading league in RBIs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 22, 2011, 06:49:41 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2 RBI, BB, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_22_cliafx_peoafx_1


Colvin: 3-5, 2B, 3B, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_22_tucaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 22, 2011, 06:51:28 pm
Lemahieu: 3-4, RBI

Flaherty: 1-3, HR, 3 RBI, BB, K

Whitenack: 5 IP, 2 R, 1st HR Allowed

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_22_mobaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 22, 2011, 06:59:48 pm
Good to see Szczur back in the lineup and stealing another base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 22, 2011, 07:46:10 pm
LeMahieu is now leading SL in batting average and Flaherty leading league in RBIs.

Flaherty is 2nd in league in HR's. Not sure I can recall a decent prospect with 10 HR's in May.  Choi had 15 in Daytona by late July, back in 1990, and Dopirak had a bunch in Peoria.  But the system has been so devoid of HR hitters, I just can't remember having two normally developing prospects like Flaherty and Bour each with 10 HR in May. 

Who am I forgetting?  Do we need to go back to Joe Carter era? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2011, 07:49:39 pm
Flaherty is 2nd in league in HR's. Not sure I can recall a decent prospect with 10 HR's in May.  Choi had 15 in Daytona by late July, back in 1990, and Dopirak had a bunch in Peoria.  But the system has been so devoid of HR hitters, I just can't remember having two normally developing prospects like Flaherty and Bour each with 10 HR in May. 

Who am I forgetting?  Do we need to go back to Joe Carter era? 
Micah Hoffpauir?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 22, 2011, 07:58:01 pm
Lake: 3-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_22_sluafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 22, 2011, 08:07:45 pm
Micah Hoffpauir?

Yeah, HOffpauir and Jake Fox!  Thanks for reminding me, brings back the memories.  But they were kind of older guys.  Hoff was 26 when he first hit 22 HR in 117 games. 

Jake Fox was a HR bomber for a while, but he was in his 4th year in high minors and 26 when he had his 17HR in 40 games ofr Iowa, that was incredible. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 22, 2011, 09:42:10 pm
Corey - have you seen Rhoderick?  I am a little surprised to see him at AA in May of his first professional year.  Can you tell us what kind of stuff he has?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 22, 2011, 10:27:33 pm
A live report on Belliveau would be fun to hear, too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 23, 2011, 08:12:23 am
I don't think it was noted anywhere, but Thomas Diamond was outrighted off the 40 man roster during the recent roster shakeups.

Chicago Cubs

Recalled: LHP Scott Maine, C Welington Castillo
Added to 40-man roster: LHP Doug Davis, OF Tony Campana
Removed from 40-man: RHP Thomas Diamond (outrighted to Triple-A)
Optioned to Triple-A: RHP Justin Berg, RHP Marcos Mateo, OF Tyler Colvin
Placed on 7-day DL: RHP Kyle Smit, OF Jim Adduci, OF D.J. Fitzgerald, OF Brett Jackson
Reinstated from DL: RHP Dallas Beeler, RHP Kyle Smit, LHP Graham Hicks, C Mario Mercedes
Placed on temporarily inactive list: OF Matt Szczur
Reinstated from inactive list: OF Matt Szczur
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 23, 2011, 08:01:23 pm
Szczur now hasn't played for 9 days.  I thought I'd read something about going to Villanova for graduation, but that doesn't seem like a 9-day event.

Depends on how good the graduation parties are....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 23, 2011, 09:02:08 pm
Kurcz: 4-2-1-1-1-5

Bour: 3-4, HR, 2 RBI, SB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_23_sluafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Szczur: 3-5, SB

Hatley: 1-0-0-0-0-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_23_cliafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


McNutt: 5-5-4-3-1-4

Lemahieu: 2-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_23_mobaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 23, 2011, 09:45:04 pm
Steal, Szczur!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 23, 2011, 09:52:15 pm
One thing about McNutt is he's not pitching a lot of innings.  He's not even averaging 4 innings a start so far, and he's only gone 6 IP in just one start this year.  He also only pitched 116 innings last year.

I don't know if they're taking it easy on him for injury considerations or what, but like with Cashner, I'm starting to wonder if we're viewing him as a 200 IP workhorse down the road.  It's kind of hard seeing him easily making that transition with the way he's been handled.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 23, 2011, 09:55:41 pm
He's been hurt, and I think they've been building up his pitch count incrementally. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 23, 2011, 11:02:31 pm
Gaub: 1-1/2 -1-0-0-0-3 , (34 K's in 18-1/3 IP)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_23_lvgaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 24, 2011, 07:11:16 am
Bour temporarily slips into the 1.001 OPS level for an aB or two.  He's near the top in many areas in the FSL:

3rd in doubles
2nd in HR
1st in XBH
2nd in slugging
1st in total bases
2nd in OPS
9th in batting average
11th in OBP

Time will tell.  But for me looking at the leader board shows that while he's excellent at everything relative to his league, he's not dominant.  There are several others who are in that vicinity too.  So it's not like he's Albert Pujols or Barry Bonds relative to his league. 

It is interesting that of the other slugging XBH/HR/OPS leaders, his K-volume is lower.  There are only four guys slugging over .530 (Bour is at .610), and he's at 29 K's, the other three are all in the 40-K zone.  So that combination of slugging and reasonable contact is potentially a rather magic combo. 

Aram prime always impressed me in that regard, and of course Manny Ramirez, with the ability to make such good contact and K so little while hitting so many HR's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 24, 2011, 08:37:49 am
BleacherNation


AA Tennessee pitcher Robert Whitenack and kid-who-plays-all-over Ryan Flaherty were the players of the week in the Southern League. Whitenack, not a top prospect entering the season, is said to have added a few MPH on his fastball this year as well as a crispness to his off-speed stuff, and is tearing up AA after an early promotion from High A. He should definitely be on your prospect radar now. Flaherty is playing all over the diamond (which is both a credit and a demerit), and leads the Southern League in RBI and is second in homers. He was a supplemental first round pick for the Cubs in 2008, and turns 25 this year. You can expect to see him with the big club if not in the second half of this year, then next year for sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 24, 2011, 08:57:01 am
Szczur is now tie for 2nd in batting average in the MIdwest League.  (The leader is riding an amazing BABIP and will not sustain.)  Szczur has missed a lot of games, of course, so his average could probably drop pretty quickly with a couple of 0-4 games, but for the moment being #2 in a 15-team league is pretty good.  He's not young, but at 21 he's not exactly old for league either.  (The leader is a 23-year undrafted guy). 

Szczur is 4th in OBP.  The three in front of him are all a couple of years older, and one has a 34% K-rate. 

Szczur is tied for 9th in SB.  I like his 12 SB.  But Billy Hamilton, a 20-year-old 2nd round pick SS by Cinci, has 37 SB after 41 games.  He's amazing, because he's got 37 SB with a .197 batting average.  Between walk and single, he's reached 1st base 41 times, and has stolen 37 bases.  Wow. 

I'd say that Szczur is putting up the most powerless average I've ever seen.  It's pretty amazing to have 39 hits, and only five extra bases.  34 singles, 5 doubles, zero triples.  You'd think just by luck there would be a groundball down the line or a looper that he could leg into a double. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 24, 2011, 09:58:27 am
Tonight's matchup between the I-Cubs and 51s will feature our Sam Fuld Jersey Shirt Giveaway! The first 1,500 fans through the gates will receive the Jersey Shirt honoring fan-favorite and I-Cub legend Sam Fuld.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: albqcubs on May 24, 2011, 10:09:14 am
I've been following the Cubs minor league system for almost twenty years.  I don't ever remember the depth of production we are seeing across the system.  We may not have the dominant superstar, but we seem to have a plethora of interesting prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 24, 2011, 11:00:53 am
Bruce Miles:

As I tweeted yesterday from Boston, farm director Oneri Fleita tells me Brett Jackson is in Arizona rehabbing his left-hand injury and getting at-bats in a controlled situation. He should be ready to rejoin Class AA Tennessee later this week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 24, 2011, 11:43:59 am
The failure to sell high on Tyler Colvin might become one of the biggest blunders of the Hendry era.

After 21 PA at Iowa, Colvin now has the following line:  .350/.381/.750/1.131.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 24, 2011, 12:12:53 pm
Bour 5-5, 3 singles and two doubles, gets his average up to .318.  Still can't get the OPS over 1.000, though.  I'd be curious to see what his hit chart might look like.  Looking at today's game recount, for example, the doubles were to center and the opposite way, as were two of the three singles.  He must be pretty disciplined about using the whole field, and I'd guess a big guy like that probably has pitchers try to keep it away quite often.   His career K-rate has been modest for a big guy all along, but this year it's under 16%.  Guys who slug without K'ing much, those guys can be pretty valuable contributors.

His OPS is now 1.001.  It would be great to see him promoted to AA and do well enough there to earn a September call-up.  He turns 23 next week, and now has 11 HR, one less than he had all of last year when he still had a quite respectable .291/.375/.436/.811 at Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 24, 2011, 12:25:17 pm
Does anyone know anything about Justin Bour's defense at 1B?  He sure looks interesting offensively.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 24, 2011, 01:27:24 pm
Bour with three more hits and another HR in this morning's game.  Again to center field.  A dead pull hitter he most certainly is not. 

Lake also with 3 hits and a HR, and a couple more K's.  He's going to K plenty, so I think the ability to hit a justifying number of HR's is crucial if he's going to be useful.  That's 3 HR's within the week for Lake, and his 4th this month.  He hit 9 last year.  I'd like to see him get into the 15+ range this summer. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 24, 2011, 01:29:11 pm
"I'd say that Szczur is putting up the most powerless average I've ever seen.  It's pretty amazing to have 39 hits, and only five extra bases.  34 singles, 5 doubles, zero triples.  You'd think just by luck there would be a groundball down the line or a looper that he could leg into a double. "

Last year that was the rap on LeMahieu, with one extra base hit in every 5.6 times at bat.  This year he has improved to one in every 3.7 at bats.  I assume that Ceasar will improve as well, but in the two games I saw last year, he seems to have a line drive swing, and I expect that he will never be a substantial home run hitter.  On the other hand, with a line drive swing, the doubles and triples should improve.  Last year he had 35 hits, and 11 were for extra bases.

In addition, he does not seem to be afraid to take a walk, having ten last year and 14 this year (with only 11 strike outs).

I have no idea how serious a prospect he is at this point, but If he can hit over three hundred and OBA near 400 with a lot of stolen bases and good defense in CF, ge certainly won't hurt whatever team he pays on.

If

If

If
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 24, 2011, 01:37:08 pm
Last year that was the rap on LeMahieu, with one extra base hit in every 5.6 times at bat.  This year he has improved to one in every 3.7 at bats.  I assume that Ceasar will improve as well, but in the two games I saw last year, he seems to have a line drive swing, and I expect that he will never be a substantial home run hitter.  On the other hand, with a line drive swing, the doubles and triples should improve.  Last year he had 35 hits, and 11 were for extra bases.

In addition, he does not seem to be afraid to take a walk, having ten last year and 14 this year (with only 11 strike outs).

I have no idea how serious a prospect he is at this point, but If he can hit over three hundred and OBA near 400 with a lot of stolen bases and good defense in CF, ge certainly won't hurt whatever team he pays on.

Good post, Dave.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 24, 2011, 01:38:02 pm
His OPS is now 1.001.  It would be great to see him promoted to AA and do well enough there to earn a September call-up.  He turns 23 next week, and now has 11 HR, one less than he had all of last year when he still had a quite respectable .291/.375/.436/.811 at Peoria.

It would be fun to have him be succeeding in the majors right away.  But I prefer a more methodical promotion rate for hitting prospects, at least during a rebuilding mode. 

If he stays really productive this year, mostly at Daytona with a few weeks in AA at the end; and then verifies with another really productive year next year starting at AA, then you might trust that he's a guy to factor into your building plans. 

jes, you're a strong advocate of a committed rebuilding program.  I think one of the worst rebuilding mistakes is to bring guys up too soon. 
*First, it's harder to know who's sustainably good and who to stick with. 

*Second, I suspect that the learning environment often really is better in the minors.   Coaches are there for the express purpose of working with developing young players. Players have more time to think about baseball and improving themselves.  The less pressured environment may be better for learning how to ride the ups and downs. The farm is for training, not Wrigley and a big-league manager who gets paid to win games. 

*Third, using big-league seasons for training purposes squanders bargain years and accelerates free agency.  If Bour is going to work out, and if we're building for 2015-2020, it might help if we could afford to keep him through those years. 

*Fourth, I think it's better for getting a good start with the fans if you're prepared to play competently once called up. 

*5th, for Cub prospects it's seemed like many who took their time transitioned smoothly.  Theriot, Soto, Barney, McGehee, Colvin last year, they were relatively prepared when they came up. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 24, 2011, 01:41:23 pm
Craig - this is not college.  Please restrict your post to no more than three points.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 24, 2011, 01:42:14 pm
And remember.  No four syllable words.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on May 24, 2011, 02:01:57 pm
I hope he turns out well for us, but Szczur is going to have to put together some XBH's to amount to anything.  Unreal that he hasn't gotten any more than he has thus far
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 24, 2011, 02:28:32 pm
He gets on base, takes walks, and steals bases.  He's a leadoff hitter.  What's not to like?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 24, 2011, 02:31:24 pm
Ceasar has relatively little experience in baseball, and the Cubs have probably tinkered with if not totally renovated his swing.  It takes quite a while for someone to become comfortable with a new baseball swing, just as any golfer knows how long it takes to become comfortable with a new golf swing.

Next year, we can get a more reasonable assessment of exactly how good a prospect Ceasar is.  Until then, the secondary numbers, such as BAPIP and walk/strikeout ratiio probably tell us more about him than his isoP. 

By the way, I don't know what isoP means.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 24, 2011, 03:21:27 pm
I agree with Clark and Dave.  I think that if Szczur goes through the season hitting .310+ with an OBP of .375+ and with a terrific stolen base record (both volume and percentage), I will consider that a very successful season for a 1st year player and a 5th round draft pick. 


Whether that's possible living on singles, I wonder.  But I'll be delighted with that to start with, and hope more doubles come along later.   

To some degree, I think management gets ripped no matter what they do in terms of draft spending.  Superslot guys, you typically have to overspend relative to their talent to sign them.  But if management doesn't draft and pay for some superslot, they're ripped as dumb and cheap.  And then if they do, they get ripped for overpaying and that the player is a failure relative to his dollars. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 24, 2011, 03:29:37 pm
Craig - it is bad enough that you use big words.  Please do not let logic enter into the conversation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 24, 2011, 04:51:18 pm
Daytona played this afternoon.  Three hits and a homer for Bour.  Three hits and a homer for Lake, along with another stolen base, his 18th.

I have heard very few comments about Lake this past month, even though he has had quite a good year so far, at least at the plate and on the bases.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 24, 2011, 05:13:25 pm
Bour with three more hits and another HR in this morning's game.  Again to center field.  A dead pull hitter he most certainly is not. 

Lake also with 3 hits and a HR, and a couple more K's.  He's going to K plenty, so I think the ability to hit a justifying number of HR's is crucial if he's going to be useful.  That's 3 HR's within the week for Lake, and his 4th this month.  He hit 9 last year.  I'd like to see him get into the 15+ range this summer. 
:) :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 24, 2011, 05:40:59 pm
As hot as Lake has been, he still has 6 walks and 46 K's this year.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_24_sluafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 24, 2011, 08:27:05 pm
Ha with a home run today, as well as Flaherty with his 11th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 24, 2011, 08:33:53 pm
I have to say that it's really awesome to me the kind of power numbers Flaherty is putting up.  That was always the knock on him at Vanderbilt - he never showed much power at all until he sold out for it his junior year. 

He pretty much seems to be the classic Wilken position player pick . . . up the middle player with power potential who hasn't fully realized it yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 24, 2011, 09:22:26 pm
Ha: 2-5, HR, RBI, K

Flaherty: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_24_msbaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_24_lvgaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 24, 2011, 10:19:36 pm
Szczur sits:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_24_wisafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 24, 2011, 10:49:27 pm
jes, you're a strong advocate of a committed rebuilding program.  I think one of the worst rebuilding mistakes is to bring guys up too soon. 

*First, it's harder to know who's sustainably good and who to stick with. 

*Second, I suspect that the learning environment often really is better in the minors.   Coaches are there for the express purpose of working with developing young players. Players have more time to think about baseball and improving themselves.  The less pressured environment may be better for learning how to ride the ups and downs. The farm is for training, not Wrigley and a big-league manager who gets paid to win games. 

*Third, using big-league seasons for training purposes squanders bargain years and accelerates free agency.  If Bour is going to work out, and if we're building for 2015-2020, it might help if we could afford to keep him through those years. 

*Fourth, I think it's better for getting a good start with the fans if you're prepared to play competently once called up. 

*5th, for Cub prospects it's seemed like many who took their time transitioned smoothly.  Theriot, Soto, Barney, McGehee, Colvin last year, they were relatively prepared when they came up.

It depends on the player, and largely on the player's psychological makeup, a point I have made many times.  I am not advocating bringing every prospect up to Wrigley to play as soon as they sign after the draft.  I merely believe that it would make a great deal of sense to commit to a rebuilding plan where the manager in the majors is NOT playing in order to win as many games as possible that season, but is trying to develop players to build the kind of talent depth which will provide a basis for extended success for the team for several years.

For many players the approach I have urged would make no difference at all in when they reach the majors.  For many others it would have them brought up earlier, and would have the team commit to playing them when they were brought up instead of parking them on the bench for extended periods or "working them in."

While I agree that it may be difficult to know in advance who is going to be "sustainably good," it is much easier to tell who has enough promise to be worth looking at for a sustained period when there is no pressure to win right then because the team makes a commitment to rebuilding an has decided not to worry about the W/L record for a couple of years.  As to players having more time to think about baseball and improving when they are in the minors.... I just don't get that one.  The clock has 24 hours in the day in the majors and the minors.  The accommodations and travel schedules and access to the fields and the facilities are better in the majors and the number of coaches are greater in the majors.  I simply do not even understand how you can seriously make that claim.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 24, 2011, 11:09:24 pm
I have to say that it's really awesome to me the kind of power numbers Flaherty is putting up.  That was always the knock on him at Vanderbilt - he never showed much power at all until he sold out for it his junior year. 

He pretty much seems to be the classic Wilken position player pick . . . up the middle player with power potential who hasn't fully realized it yet.

Yes, it's pretty neat if he can even remotely keep this up.  OPS over 1.000 now.

1.  It's sure a lot easier to hit .300 when you're hitting HR's.  11 of his 51 hits are HR.  Turn those hits into flyouts and he's hitting .240. 

2.  It's sure a lot easier to both hit well and to hit HR's when you've got the strength to hit them without compromising.  I think a lot of guys sell out their swing trying to hit with more power. 

I recall Az Phil commenting on how really big Flaherty had gotten.  Not sure when that was, maybe last fall?  At that time he seemed to think Flaherty had grown into an immobile LF/1B/DH.  I wonder how true that really is, but perhaps he has grown into a lot more strength.  But in a picture or two, he doesn't look that overgrown.  I'd be curious to get a report from a Smokies observer on how big he really is, and how mobile or immobile he is defensively when he's playing 2B. 

Anyway, it's sure been a nice story.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 25, 2011, 12:12:31 am
...I merely believe that it would make a great deal of sense to commit to a rebuilding plan where the manager in the majors is NOT playing in order to win ... but is trying to develop players ....

For many players the approach I have urged ... would have them brought up earlier, and would have the team commit to playing them when they were brought up ...."

...it is much easier to tell who has enough promise to be worth looking at for a sustained period when there is no pressure to win ....  As to players having more time to think about baseball and improving when they are in the minors.... I just don't get that one.  The clock has 24 hours in the day in the majors and the minors.  The accommodations and travel schedules and access to the fields and the facilities are better in the majors and the number of coaches are greater in the majors.  I simply do not even understand how you can seriously make that claim.

We agree on two main things:  we need to develop some good players, and it's not great for prospects to sit a whole lot. 

I'm not sold yet that the big-league roster should be turned into a minor league team.  Or that the best way to develop the prospects is to call them up early and play them a lot before they're actually developed enough to play a lot on merit.  We've got six minor league teams for developing, I don't understand why it's so important to use the Cubs as a 7th, or how that will better their development.   

You did not address the financial disadvantage of burning several cheap years for development. 

My angle would be that if you let them develop in the minors, then they'd be ready to be both given and to earn heavy playing time when they came up, as has been true for Castro, Barney, Colvin last year, Randy Wells when he came up, Soto, etc.. 

Your point on how there are as many hours in a big-league day and more coaches is true.  Perhaps the Cubs would be as good or better a developmental team than at Tennessee or Daytona.  But I'm not sure.  There is a difference in pressure.  You want pressure taken off, but the majors is inherently more pressure-filled.  And being unready and failing provides inherent pressure  as well.  2nd, there are more distracting night clubs and groupie girls in Chicago for a big-league Cub with a big-league salary than I think there  are in Peoria or DesMoines or Fargo.   Third, long bus rides may be a better place for coach-talk than on the fancier planes.  Fourth, the game-day commute in Chicago takes longer than in Peoria.  But the main things are the focus on learning and development, and the pressure difference. 


But of course I might be wrong on that.  Perhaps playing in the national league with the big-league club is a much better developmental situation, if only the manager was directed by Hendry to treat the team as a developmental club, and if managers were hired based on their developmental capabilities.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 25, 2011, 09:46:48 am
Outfielder Ty Wright will be moving from Tennessee to Iowa today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 25, 2011, 11:51:36 am
We've talked about this before, but I'm skeptical that "rushing" a position player hurts his long-term development.   Pitchers are different, I think.

When hitters struggle, it's often because pitchers are exploiting a hole or the hitter just can't handle a certain kind of pitch or combination of pitches.  For a talented hitter, that exposure may not really happen until the big leagues level.  Either you fix it or you don't or you fix it to some extent or don't to some extent.  I don't think it's a confidence thing all tlhat much.  It's adjusting and learning on the job.  Of course, make-up is important for any position, but hitters all slump here and there and they know that.

I think a pticher can sometimes, maybe irrevocably, lose confidence if they are rushed and have trouble getting big league hitters out.  Maybe they alter something, become afraid to challenge hitters, do something with their delivery they shouldn't, try to do too much or what have you.  Maybe they get hurt trying to do something they shouln't.  Lot of things that don't help in the long term.

Think of the times you have seen a big leaguer look kind of scared or at least not confident----for me anyway, it's usually a pitcher.

Corey Patterson always gets mentioned as a rush job.  but, I don't think that his arrival date in the majors had any long-term impact on his career.  He had holes he never fixed, the plate discipline issues we all know, etc.  He could have spent 10 years in the minors and they'd still be there when he came up. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 25, 2011, 12:37:40 pm
I think that rushing a player can be more devistating to a position player than to a pitcher.  All the top prospects have the skill to play in the big leagues, and most of them have the ability to adjust.  But the mental aspect is much greater for a hitter than for a pitcher.  When a player is doing well, he thinks he can hit anyone, and often can.  When he is in a slump, he thinks he can hit no one, and often can't.

Some prospects will not be bother in the slightest to come to the majors before he is ready.  But a great many lose so much confidence that the slightest slump can turn into a disaster.  The majors is the last place you want your player to be concentrating on the fundamentals of hitting.  Most good hitters say that the last thing they should be doing while hitting is thinking about it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 25, 2011, 12:59:42 pm
good points, reb. I totally agree on Corey.  And I agree that pitchers and hitters are very different.  You make an interesting point about how a rushed, overmatched pitcher may respond in a counterproductive way. 

I'm often actually much more comfortable advancing a pitcher very rapidly.  If he's locating good stuff, trying to throw it more consistently isn't much different in A- than in AA.  So my view is that a pitcher can advance very rapidly without ill effect, in many cases.  Pitchers can change and improve much more abruptly than hitters, and thus change/improve their qualifications for pitching effectively at a much higher level.  I'm not that concerned with advancing pitchers perhaps too quickly in the minors, but I do think it can impede development when pitchers get called to the majors too quickly.  First, they are often moved to relief and pitch/practice less.  Second, power-pitcher prospects sometimes use little more than two pitches (if that) in big-league relief.  To succeed in big-league rotation they'll usually need a 3rd or 4th pitch, and in the minors they'd keep working on those.  But in short big-league relief, they may not.

With hitters, your point looks sensible, that rushing exposes weaknesses and prompts adjustments.  I fully agree that rushing exposes weaknesses. 

But I'm unconvinced that rushing benefits development, or that they need to be rushed to realize they have any weaknesses to improve upon.  Hitters are seeing plenty of fast and moving pitches in A and AA, and are already failing most AB's there.  If a guy has problems with inside heat, or outside breaking ball, or pitch recognition, or going the opposite way, those problems are already exposed to the hitter and to coaches who are watching him every day, even if he's still at Daytona.  He probably knows what he needs to improve upon to become better. 

We fans might not know, but the hitter usually does.  For example, maybe if promoted it will be exposed that Bour can't really handle heat; or inside LH pitching; or good breaking balls.  Maybe his current numbers are built on hitting mistakes, RH pitchers, and not-that-fast stuff.  If so, he may never get that "fixed", and those career-killing problems might be exposed if promoted.  But I suspect he already knows the guys and the pitches that are hard on him, and he's already probably making what adjustments he can.  I suspect that his development will not be compromised by letting him sit in Daytona for months longer. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 25, 2011, 01:26:05 pm
Craig- The issues about moving a pitcher up a level to a higher level of the minors is a bit different than moving that guy up to the majors, as you note.  I don't think a player or pitcher generally is benefited by being "rushed" to the majors. The concern is whether there is an ulitmate downside in the long-term by being rushed. 

I don't think there is any way to quantify whether it's worse to rush a pitcher or a hitter to the majors--so Dave's argument to the contrary is probably just as valid as mine--but I worry more about a pitcher.  Overall, I tend to think that the argument about rushing either is overstated.  If a player does not perform when he's called up, it doesn't help the club and it doesn't help the player.  But, in most cases, the player is what he is and will have the career that he would have had anyway--no matter the timing of reaching the majors.

The frustration is watching a guy "learning on the job" at the major league level.  But, you can say that about even Castro. He's making some mistakes that he won't make down the road.  In the meantime, however, he's better than any of the organization's alternatives at SS and he's probably going to be better in 2012 because he's in the majors in 2011 than if he was at Iowa in 2011. 

Put another way, I'd be less concerned long-term about bringing up B. Jackson tomorrow than bringing up McNutt tomorrow, even aside from McNutt's semi-rehab now.  I'd worry more that getting knocked around in the majors is worse for McNutt's development than Jackson having a tough time would be for his development. 

Of course, assuming short-term failure, whatever happens later has more to do with the guy's make-up and skills than what position he playes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 25, 2011, 02:43:10 pm
Reb is right.  There is absolutely no way to quantify the results, or prove either side.  It is quite possible to point out failures and successes, but there is no way to prove that the failures would have been successes, or even that the successes would have been even more successful if handled differently.

The only rational way to deal with it is to just take my word for it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on May 25, 2011, 04:06:36 pm
Thanks for input, jigs. 

Q's, if you can share any thoughts:

1.  How Flaherty has mostly split his time this spring between left, 2B, and SS.  Does he look like he could play 2b, really?  And any SS at all?  Or does he look too big and slow and rangeless, and the middle infield stuff is just what they do in the minors, but he's got no chance to play 2B in the majors?  Also, any thoughts on how he might look at 3B, defensively?    I guess if you had any thoughts on how he projects as a major-league hitter, that would be great to hear, too. 

2.  How about Lemahieu, any observations on how awful or OK he looks at 2B or 3B?  I'd love to have him make it at 2B, given his bat. 

3.  On Carpenter, it's fun that he can throw 98 or whatever.  But it seems like while he's really fast, he's really wild (20 walks in 21 innings), but he's still really hittable (21 hits in 21 innings).  2.0 WHIP.  Why can't he get anybody out if he's so fast?  Just high straight whackable fastball s, or what? 

4.  More defense:  Marwin Gonzalez, is he big-league defensively?  Barney caliber?  Or not that good. 
Is Ridling a pokey unathletic slug?  Or is he fine at 1B?  Do you think he has any chance to be a major leaguer?
Ditto for Spencer.  Would he be like a Soriano defensively?  Or might he be OK defensively, and if he hit enough he might be a major leaguer? 

Thanks. 



1]Ryan Flaherty is by no means a SS.

He's no more of a SS than Aramis Ramirez is.

He'd be fine at 2nd or 3rd though.

As far as what he may do offensively all I know is he's very lanky and looks to me like he could bulk up quite a bit if he wanted to.

2]As far as Lemahieu goes Ive never seen him look bad or umcomfortable at all in the field but I dont get to go to anywhere near as many games as I used to so he could very well be awful.

I havent seen any signs of it though.

3]Regarding Carpenter he cant get his breaking stuff over so they sit on the fastball and rip it and he's very easily rattled.

Ive seen enough of him I have a pretty good grasp of what's going on with him.

4]Marwin Gonzalez isnt Darwin Barney but I think he's fine at SS.

Rebel Ridling is fat and unathletic.

He has hit a little but he's never gonna win a gold glove.

His bat might get him to the majors though.

I wont lie to you all that Im not a Matt Spencer fan.

He swings as hard as he can so if he gets lucky and hits it it'll go far and he couldnt hit a breaking ball if a little leaguer threw it to him.

He'd also make Alfonso Soriano look like Willie Mays in the OF.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on May 25, 2011, 04:09:07 pm
Corey - have you seen Rhoderick?  I am a little surprised to see him at AA in May of his first professional year.  Can you tell us what kind of stuff he has?

I have seen him once but I really didnt pay a ton of attention.

Ill let you all know everything I can tell you the next time I see him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 25, 2011, 04:20:14 pm
Thanks, Corey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 25, 2011, 04:47:05 pm
Thanks much, jigs.  That's really helpful.  Nice to hear that Flaherty is lanky and if anything looks like he could still add more.  (I don't think it's out of the question that he'd end up in LF, or perhaps 1B.  In which case getting bigger/stronger might be worth it.) 

Also encouraging that Flaherty looks fine at 2B/3B, and that Lemahieu looks comfortable.  Neither of them make many errors, for whatever that's worth. 

Heh, sorry to hear the bad report on Spencer.  He's up near the top of the league in HR's, slugging, and OPS, so I'd wondered whether he might not have a shot. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 25, 2011, 04:47:53 pm
Jigs, if you happen to get to a game where Beliveau pitches, would be fun to get a report on him too, just like with Rhoderick. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 25, 2011, 04:54:05 pm
Video from yesterday's Smokies game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bnO2dUfvNw&NR=1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bnO2dUfvNw&NR=1)

Is that Jiggs on the dugout or is it him near the end?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 25, 2011, 04:58:45 pm
My mistake - that is from May 13, not May 24
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 25, 2011, 05:27:51 pm
OF Ty Wright returns to the I-Cubs today.  Wright began the season with Iowa and batted .278 with a home run and three RBI in six games before getting re-assigned to double-A Tennessee on April 15.  He played in just three games for the Smokies before spraining his ankle sliding into second base and landing on the disabled list.  He spent time at the Cubs' complex in Mesa, AZ rehabbing the injury.  Wright was a mid-season All-Star at Tennessee last season before coming up and batting .240 with a homer and 16 RBI in 58 games with Iowa to finish the season.

This choice is a little curious since Wright is  coming off the Smokies DL
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 25, 2011, 05:36:43 pm
Does anyone know anything about Justin Bour's defense at 1B?  He sure looks interesting offensively.

He's made an awful lot of errors for a firstbaseman -- 15 errors in 118 games last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 25, 2011, 06:01:16 pm
Another double by Ceasar.  The man is an extra base machine.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 25, 2011, 07:19:02 pm
Iowa is up 1-0 on a homer by DH Bryan LaHair.  Their game has a better chance of being played.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 25, 2011, 08:51:56 pm
Struck: 6-7-0-0-0-8

Silva: 2-3, 2B, HR, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_25_sluafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb



Peoria's DH gets suspended.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 25, 2011, 09:09:54 pm
Lemahieu: 2-5, 2 2B, SB, K

Vitters: 2-5, 2B, RBI, K, E

Carpenter gets through 2 innings with 2 hits allowed on just 13 pitches.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_25_msbaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 25, 2011, 09:23:31 pm
Gaub: 1-0-0-0-1-3 , ( 22 K's last 11 IP )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_25_lvgaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 25, 2011, 10:20:31 pm
C'mon, Cubs, just move Vitters off third base already.

He can't handle it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 25, 2011, 10:30:07 pm
Vitters' error tonight came while playing 1st.

I'd say his playing time between the positions has been about 60/40.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 25, 2011, 10:31:06 pm
Oh, I didn't know that.

Thanks, Chris.

C'mon, Cubs, when are you gonna dump Vitters?

He sucks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 25, 2011, 11:27:17 pm
Man, Lemahieu has been pretty amazing with the batting average.  Nice to see a couple of doubles from him, and one from Szczur even if that one won't count. 

Cactus, thanks for that interesting little Smokies youtube.  Man those kids tend to be slender down there.  Whitenack really is a stick.  And if Lemahieu has added 20 pounds of muscle, I'd sure like to see how slender he was before doing so. 

Jiggs made reference to Ridling being "fat", and he may be, or not be as fat-free as most pro athletes.  But just in the passing Youtube clip he didn't impress me as being obviously fat. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 26, 2011, 01:26:24 am
Gaub: 1-0-0-0-1-3 , ( 22 K's last 11 IP )

If Gaub didn't have 14 walks in 19.1 innings, he'd already be in Chicago. 

His stats are strange looking.  He's either really on or way off.  One question I have is why he has appeared in only 17 of Iowa's 46 games and has yet to pitch two days in a row..

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=453304 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=453304)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2011, 01:59:37 am
Marcus Hatley promoted to Daytona. He had 21 K's in 15-1/3 IP and a .170 BAA at Peoria.

Ryan Searle will move up to AA. He had a 1.59 ERA and a .180 BAA in Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on May 26, 2011, 07:05:42 am
Luis Flores is on quite a roll right now (small sample size but he has 4 HRs in 17 ABs at Tennessee).  I am guessing that he isn't much of a prospect given that he gets promoted each year and has never hit or played much.

I did a little research and was surprised that he was a 7th rounder and has never had 200 ABs in a season.  Unless he has been injured quite a bit it is odd that he has never been given much of an opportunity to play despite being a pretty early draft pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 26, 2011, 07:57:43 am
In 201 plate appearances Justin Bour has 12 HR (tying his career high), 14 doubles,  20 walks (10% of his trips to the plate and right about his career avg), 31 K's) and a hitting line of .335/.398/.626/1.024.

I would look at moving the guy up to Tennessee soon, and continue to hope that if he does well after a mid-season promotion it might bring a September call-up and real playing time to get a better idea of how he fits into future plans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 26, 2011, 08:05:02 am
Luis Flores is on quite a roll right now (small sample size but he has 4 HRs in 17 ABs at Tennessee).  I am guessing that he isn't much of a prospect given that he gets promoted each year and has never hit or played much.

I did a little research and was surprised that he was a 7th rounder and has never had 200 ABs in a season.  Unless he has been injured quite a bit it is odd that he has never been given much of an opportunity to play despite being a pretty early draft pick.


Thanks for the heads up on that.  I hadn't been paying much attention to Flores at all.

Flores has been suspended by the Cubs a couple of times for rules violations too, so that's also hurt his progress.  I guess he must have some potential the Cubs see because they keep hanging on to him in spite of the suspensions and lack of production up to this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 26, 2011, 09:03:07 am
24-year-old Flores had a .197 batting average entering this season, with 7 HR in three seasons.  Funny how even a bad hitter can lock in for a week once in a while. 

I think he's supposed to have quite excellent defensive tools. 

You never know.  As jhawk mentioned, he still has only 511 AB in his career, so who knows whether he's ever been both healthy and settled in anywhere to play to whatever his talents may actually be.  For small samples, we often look to BABIP to account for flukes.  Flores has been only a .230 BABIP guy.  If his career numbers had a .300 BABIP, he'd have a career .260 average, which wouldn't look so bad for a good-defense catcher with a little power and a decent BB/K profile.  But for most of his career, he just hasn't hit. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 26, 2011, 09:04:05 am
jes, thanks for the note on Bour's errors.  15 errors last year for a 1B, that is indeed poor.  He's got 4 this season, in 40-some games at 1B. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 26, 2011, 01:44:39 pm
More on Bour....

He also is tied for 5th in the league in BA, is 2nd in HR (one behind the leader), tied for 9th in OBP, and is 2nd in both slugging and OPS (5 points behind the leader in slugging and 7 points in OPS) and turns 23 next week.  He also has 4 steals in the minors and has only been caught once, so despite his size, he might move a bit better than a turtle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 26, 2011, 02:49:11 pm
Tennessee's game has been postponed so Geo's rehab is delayed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 26, 2011, 05:28:47 pm
Clevenger with a couple more singles today as Iowa loses (again). Peoria, Daytona, and Tenn seem to win all the time, and Iowa hardly ever.  I wonder what the W-L records actually are? 

Clevenger is now hitting .383 on the year, .447 at Iowa.  And with a walk today, he's got a 5walk/2K ratio in 38 AB at Iowa.  On the spring, he's 14walks/12K/128 AB. 

Seasonal OBP is .441. 


Rhee is listed for Daytona tonight, so it looks like after all he's in the rotation.  He wasn't in the first week (although he may have been a piggy-backer, I don't know).  And then he immediately went on the long-term blister DL.  But now he'll get his second straigh start tonight. I'll be curious to see how he settles out.  It's been three years since surgery, so while his control might have a ways to go, and he may be getting past other injuries, whatever surgery recovery should be recovered by now.   


Peoria is playing, Greathouse picking up the game the started yesterday.  So Szczur will get credit for his rare double yesterday.  And I'm sure little LePage, who hit his 2nd HR, will want that on his official stats, too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 26, 2011, 07:05:49 pm
RHP Marcus Hatley moves from Peoria to Daytona apparently to take Buchter's roster spot

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t450&t=p_pbp&pid=502281
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2011, 07:43:59 pm
Peoria GM 1:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_25_wisafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_26_lvgaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 26, 2011, 08:25:09 pm
As Craig (I think) said above, Peoria, Daytona and Tennessee are all dominating, while Iowa is doing poorly.

What makes it even more interesting is that the three doing so well are doing so with just about nothing but prospects, while the team with a lot of AAAA veterans is doing badly.  That is just about the opposite of our past history.

By the way, isn't it about time to release Hill and bring up Clevenger.  We have been told that the pitchers like to pitch to him, and he certainly can't hit much worse than Hill.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 26, 2011, 08:27:29 pm
By the way, isn't it about time to release Hill and bring up Clevenger.  We have been told that the pitchers like to pitch to him, and he certainly can't hit much worse than Hill.

Obviously, you know very little about the dynamics of baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 26, 2011, 08:31:01 pm
I thought that only applied to grizzled relievers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 26, 2011, 08:34:14 pm
I thought that only applied to grizzled relievers.

Actually, it applies to dopey GMs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2011, 08:49:59 pm
Rhee: 5-5-2-2-1-10 , 2 HR

Bour: HR, 2 RBI, 2 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_26_braafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2011, 09:14:30 pm
Simpson: 5-2-1-0-1-7

Szczur: 1-3, 2B, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_26_wisafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 26, 2011, 09:32:03 pm
Hey, what gives with Szczur?

No walks and no steals?

Bum!

Nice to see Simpson with a good start for a change.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2011, 09:35:03 pm
Szczur doesn't really walk all that much.

I get the feeling he's a hyper hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 26, 2011, 09:55:53 pm
Last year Ceasar walked about 10% of the time.  This year it is a little higher.

By Cub standards, that beats out Berry Bonds.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on May 26, 2011, 10:01:58 pm
Great start for Simpson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 26, 2011, 10:02:19 pm
I consider a 1 BB to 8 AB ratio like Szczur has to be plenty adequate. 

My benchmark for being an average walker is 1 BB per 10 AB.  If you're doing better than that, I think that's pretty solid.  If you're below that, like most Cub prospects, you're a walkaphobe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 26, 2011, 10:04:33 pm
14 walks in 114 AB seems like a pretty healthy walk rate to me. 

Now that he's mr. doubles, maybe the stealing will slow down, heh heh. 

Weird to have Rhee with a big K-burst.  That would be fun if he got back on the map. 

Likewise with Simpson.  An NSBB guy was at the last Simpson game, and wasn't too impressed.  Another guy said his brother was sitting behind Fleita at the game, so he could see his radar gun, and Simpson was mostly in the 87-88 range or something like that. 

Hopefully these guys are just getting things straightened out, and Simpson will be throwing hard enough soon enough. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2011, 10:06:29 pm
Szczur's on pace for 72 walks per 600 AB's.

Yes, for a Cubs player, that's phenomenal. For a 22-year-old college guy in Low-A Ball, it doesn't strike me as more than average.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 26, 2011, 10:10:32 pm
The average BB to AB ratio in MLB this season is 9.6% or slightly worse than 1 BB per 10 AB.  Szczur has a BB to AB ratio of 12.2%.

He may not be taking walks like Barry Bonds or Brett Jackson, but like craig said, that's a healthy amount, especially for someone who isn't putting much fear into pitchers with his power numbers.

Hey, if he ever does grow into some power like some people hope and pitchers start fearing that, he may turn out to be a truly plus walker.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 26, 2011, 10:52:15 pm
I hope Bour isn't starting to sell out too much for the HR's.  He's clicked being a good hitter who hit and made contact and sometimes hit the ball out.  But he's K'd more the last couple of games.  If he starts swinging to hit HR's all the time, I think that could end up counterproductive. 

but, that's also part of what playing for a while in the minor leagues is for, to learn when to back off and stay disciplined. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on May 26, 2011, 11:59:20 pm
"I'd hate to think where we'd be without Koyie Hill."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 27, 2011, 08:07:24 am
The Ryan Harvey conversion to pitcher didn't last long.
 
Ryan Harvey (http://www.rotoworld.com/player/mlb/1285/ryan-harvey) - R - Red Sox (http://www.rotoworld.com/teams/clubhouse/mlb/bos/red-sox)     
 
Red Sox released RHP Ryan Harvey.
 
Harvey, who was signed to a minor league deal last December, had been at extended spring training as he worked on his conversion from outfielder to reliever. Evidently the Sox weren't too impressed with what they saw and have decided to abandon the experiment.
 
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 08:27:07 am
I consider a 1 BB to 8 AB ratio like Szczur has to be plenty adequate. 

My benchmark for being an average walker is 1 BB per 10 AB.  If you're doing better than that, I think that's pretty solid.  If you're below that, like most Cub prospects, you're a walkaphobe.

The average walk rate for the Daytona Cubs this year is 9.1% (153 times in 1665 ABs, with the Daytona Cubs 6th out of 12 in team walks).  For the entire Florida State League it is 9.37%, a tick higher.  For Iowa the walk rate is 9.41%, while the PCL overall is at 9.75, again a tick higher than the Cub farm team (which is next to last of the 16 PCL teams in team walks). 

The AA Tennessee Smokies are next to last in their league in walks and have a walk rate of 9.06%, while the league overall has a walk rate of 10.27%.  The A-Ball Peoria Chiefs are next to last in walks among the 16 teams, with a walk rate of 7.29% compared to a league rate of 10.28%.

Without looking for any 2011 stats for the short season Boise Hawks, the 2010 team finished last in the league in walks, walks behind the nest worst (174 to 242) for a team walk rate of 6.77, compared to the league average of 10.08%.

The Cubs major league team is last in the league in walks with 127  (league avg is 152), and have a walk rate of 7.62%, compared to the league average of 9.59%.

(I generally look at walk rates per plate appearance, but for the purpose of comparing one team to another or to the league, so long as apples and apples are used, it makes no difference, and JR's reference was BB per AB.)

So the impression of the Cubs not doing as well as the rest of the league appears clearly valid, and, judging from a look at the farm teams, it also is clearly valid throughout the entire Cub system, whether a result of instruction or player selection, it would appear the Cubs could benefit from having the entire organization read Ted Williams' book on hitting, and by having Hendry begin driving a greater emphasis on walks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 27, 2011, 08:47:39 am
(I generally look at walk rates per plate appearance, but for the purpose of comparing one team to another or to the league, so long as apples and apples are used, it makes no difference, and JR's reference was BB per AB.)

You're right that it'd be more appropriate to use PA's, but it's just easier to eyeball it if someone has a 1:10 ratio of walks to AB. 

The 1:10 ratio isn't exactly accurate either, but like you pointed out, since league averages are generally in the 9.5% to 10% range, it's just an easy way to judge if a player has a 10% walk ratio to AB's.

In MLB last year, the average BB to PA ratio was 8.5%.  That's not nearly as easy to eyeball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 27, 2011, 08:50:22 am
The key to walks is to be able to be reasonably successful in two strike counts.  If you're an almost sure out with two strikes, it puts pressure on you to hack at anything close in one strike counts.  That makes it very difficult to draw walks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 27, 2011, 08:55:19 am
I don't have time to look at the numbers, but my impression is that the Cubs are taught to swing early in the count.  If this is true, then they would not only be below average in walks, but also below average in strike outs.  Does any one know if this it true, either at the major league or minor league level?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 09:15:18 am
You're right that it'd be more appropriate to use PA's, but it's just easier to eyeball it if someone has a 1:10 ratio of walks to AB. 

I'm not suggesting that it is more appropriate, but just the way that I generally look at it, and that is largely a result of playing the tabletop baseball game Big League Manager 40 years ago, where the first thing you checked was whether the guy walked (or was HBP) and then whether he got a hit, and then if no hit whether he K'd and if he didn't K, then what other kind of out he made.  Simply caused me to look at walks in relation to total plate appearance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 09:36:36 am
I don't have time to look at the numbers, but my impression is that the Cubs are taught to swing early in the count.  If this is true, then they would not only be below average in walks, but also below average in strike outs.  Does any one know if this it true, either at the major league or minor league level?

Having little more than time.....  it appears you are right.  The Cubs as a team are 14th in the league in K's by their hitters -- league avg is 364 in 33 games.  The Cubs have played 33 games and have 331 Ks', with both teams behind them having played fewer games (and being close enough they could catch the Cubs with another game or two).  In the minors, Peoria and Boise have the fewest K's in the league, and by wide margins.   The Smokies are have only one more K than the team with the fewest, Daytona is 6th of 12 in K's and Iowa is clearly contrary to the franchise trend,  having more Ks for their hitters than all but one team in the league and having the highest K rate in the league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 27, 2011, 10:02:50 am
That is a key, Play.  I always thought that was the key to why Corey and Harvey and guys like that never really had much of a chance to walk much.  Corey tried at times, but his pitch recognition and contact skills were so poor that getting into more 2-strike counts negated whatever advantage there might have been in being more patient and taking more walks. 

But that's also why I've always thought that guys who were gifted contact hitters COULD potentially take more walks....  IF they were persuaded that it was worth it.  Barney, Vitters, Lemahieu, Ha have that potential. Lake, different story.  (Of course, maybe I just think those guys are skilled contact guys based on few K's.  But maybe if they did take pitches, they'd be K'ing as much as Jackson and my perception as contact guys would change.)   

Walks are an inherently useful thing.  But it's certainly possible that if Clevenger or Lemahieu decided to try to walk more, they'd lose as much or more in batting average than they gained in IsoD.  The fact that they're hitting .360+ suggests that they aren't fishing and outing themselves on a lot of bad balls.  I suspect their pitch recognition and plate discipline is actually pretty good.  It's just that their contact hitting is so good that their AB's rarely get to the walk/K stage.  Usually they get a decent hittable strike before that and the AB gets resolved by hitting the ball. 

But with Vitters having such a low average, and hitting with so little power despite his alleged physical strength and bat speed, that suggests to me that his pitch recognition and plate discipline isn't so good.  D.J. may be swinging only at decent hittable strikes, but Vitters seems to be swinging and outing himself on a lot of pitches that aren't so decent or hittable. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 27, 2011, 10:44:20 am
From the stats, Barney hits pretty well with two strikes on him.  It's puzzling that he isn't able to work the count better and get more walks.  Soriano on the other hand is absolutely terrible with two strikes, so he almost has to go up there ready to hack at the first decent pitch.  Suprisingly, Fuku is pretty lousy in two strike counts (except 3-2).  Perhaps Fuku is too patient?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 27, 2011, 10:52:10 am
From the stats, Barney hits pretty well with two strikes on him.  It's puzzling that he isn't able to work the count better and get more walks. 

I think there's a very simple explanation for it.  Pitchers aren't afraid to go after him because he doesn't have much extra base power.  Their attitude is a guy like Barney should hit his way on, and fortunately he's been doing a lot of that.

You don't see a lot of singles hitters who are truly plus walkers.  Even when a guy like Theriot is able to show some above average walking tendencies for a while, pitchers adjust by throwing him more strikes and his adjustment to that is he has to swing more. 

That's part of the reason why you really can't have high expectations for Szczur to walk 80 times in a season as long as he remains a singles hitter.  Pitchers are absolutely going to make it a point not to walk a guy who steals bases like he does and can't hurt them with extra base hits. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 27, 2011, 10:59:08 am
That makes sense, JR.  Of course, it's a concession to pitch to a hitter in a way that dramatically reduces the likelihood of issuing a walk.  You can't use your best stuff/location as regularly.  As long as pitchers take that approach with Barney, perhaps it's not so improbable that he will be able to maintain an excellent BA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 27, 2011, 11:16:58 am
The Iowa Cubs have extended their PDC through 2016.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 27, 2011, 11:46:33 am
That makes sense, JR.  Of course, it's a concession to pitch to a hitter in a way that dramatically reduces the likelihood of issuing a walk.  You can't use your best stuff/location as regularly.  As long as pitchers take that approach with Barney, perhaps it's not so improbable that he will be able to maintain an excellent BA.

That's a great point.  Vintage Sammy might have an easier time taking walks because pitchers are pitching around him.  But singles Barney/Lemahieu/Szczur/Clevenger might get fatter pitches to hit more often. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 27, 2011, 12:24:19 pm
 Brett Jackson will resume playing for Class AA Tennessee Monday after rehabbing his hand injury in Arizona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 27, 2011, 12:52:26 pm
Bruce Miles talks to Oneri Fleita

I asked Oneri what the radar-gun readings were on Simpson.“I took the guns out of the ballpark,” he answered. "I can care less. For him, I took them out. For him and a couple of other guys, I’ve taken the guns out, because I don’t care. I want to know you’re throwing strikes, you’re getting guys out and you’re creating groundballs when you pitch. After that, I haven’t seen a gun get anybody out.”


http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/5774 (http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/5774)
 
  There's a LOT more including that   Jae-Hoon Ha will be staying in Tennessee after Brett Jackson returns.
 
 Comments on Vitters, Colvin, and McNutt
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 27, 2011, 01:00:17 pm
I thought I'd take a look at the greatest leadoff hitter the Cubs have had since I've been a fan, Kenny Lofton, to see if I could find any points of comparison with a guy like Szczur (BTW what a shame it is that three months of Kenny Lofton is the greatest period of leadoff hitting in my 21 years of Cub fandom.).  I wanted to see if perhaps Lofton was a guy who grew into walking more as he grew into the 10-15 home run power he had for most of his career.

Well the first thing is that, no he didn't grow into walking significantly more as he hit for more power.  Actually as it turns out, Lofton's walk rate was in line with what Szczur is already doing.  Lofton had a career walk rate of 11.1% in the minors, 10.2% for his total major league career, and 12.4% during his prime major league years of 1992-1999.  Szczur, as we have already pointed out, is walking 11.8% of the time. 

Actually, Lofton is probably a good guy to reference as a best case scenario for Szczur.  Lofton was also an inexperienced baseball player when he was drafted by the Astros.  He was playing college basketball for Arizona and didn't even play college baseball until his junior year.  The Astros took it even easier on Lofton than we are with Szczur, holding him back in short season ball through age 22 before moving him on to a full season league at 23.  Power wise, their developments compare well, with Szczur having 18 career extra base hits in 220 AB compared to Lofton's 15 extra base hits in his first 389 career minor league AB.

Basically we just need to hope Szczur can develop some of Lofton's later pop while retaining first rate speed.  If he does that and keeps his walk and K rates where they are, we might really have something.

Lofton minor league stats:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=lofton001ken (http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=lofton001ken)

Lofton major league stats:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/l/loftoke01.shtml (http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/l/loftoke01.shtml)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 27, 2011, 01:02:55 pm
Bruce Miles talks to Oneri Fleita

I asked Oneri what the radar-gun readings were on Simpson.“I took the guns out of the ballpark,” he answered. "I can care less. For him, I took them out. For him and a couple of other guys, I’ve taken the guns out, because I don’t care. I want to know you’re throwing strikes, you’re getting guys out and you’re creating groundballs when you pitch. After that, I haven’t seen a gun get anybody out.

Ha!  You really don't have to do much reading between the lines to figure out what that means.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 27, 2011, 01:20:51 pm
Will get a chance to see Bohr twice this weekend. Hopefully I'll get to see him at 1st. All the previous games I've gone to he has been the DH. Fleita is right about one thing...he's a big kid.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 01:24:26 pm
Shouldn't we wait for jiggy to weigh in on that?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 27, 2011, 01:53:54 pm
Ha!  You really don't have to do much reading between the lines to figure out what that means.

I was going to say the same thing.

Man, what a ringing endorsement that is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 27, 2011, 02:40:35 pm
It seems to me that Fleita quote looks a bit different when you read it in the full context of what he had to say about Simpson and his development.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 27, 2011, 02:41:05 pm
I agree with Fleita on de-emphasizing Simpson's velocity. While he's recovered from his bout with mono, he's had a very long layoff and wasn't able to work out last winter. It wouldn't help either Simpson or the Cubs if he hurt his arm trying to get back to his college velo this season. If he gets comfortable with professional baseball and learns to pitch without his best stuff, we can worry about his velo in 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 02:57:28 pm
Barney.... (has) clearly been one of the Cubs' best players so far this season.

Ans Sleepy was the tallest of the Seven Dwarves...  Talk about damning someone with faint praise....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 27, 2011, 03:18:28 pm
RHP Alberto Cabrera will be promoted from AA Tennessee to AAA Iowa on Sunday

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t553&t=p_pbp&pid=501227
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 03:26:49 pm
If (Barney) falls below a line of .280/.300/.325 his spot in the lineup should go to a platoon of Blake DeWitt and Jeff Baker because numbers like that are unacceptable no matter how good his defense is.

.260/299/.367 was the career line of Bill Mazerowski and it got him to the HOF, during a period when offense in the NL was little different from what it is now.   (In 1966, when Maz was 28, about mid-point in his career, the league average was 4.1 runs a game per team.  Today it is 4.1 runs a game.)

Maz had a career OPS+ of 84.  Barney right now has an OPS+ of 96, on a raw OPS of .730.  The StrikeZone slashline would produce a raw OPS of .625 (just below where Blake DeWitt now is), which right now would be an OPS+ of roughly 66, which even though that would clearly be anemic, would STILL leave Barney with a major fielding edge over DeWitt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 03:28:14 pm
.... And from reading on, it appears several others made that exact point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 27, 2011, 04:21:56 pm
More minor league roster moves

LHP J.R. Mathes has been released. He is the I-Cubs career win leader (42). RHP Marco Carrillo goes  Iowa from Tennessee

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t553&t=p_pbp&pid=456150
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 27, 2011, 05:06:22 pm
Thanks for the Fleita link, some interesting stuff there.  Comments on Bour being in better shape and looking better defensively, that's interesting. I can't remember many Cub prospects who were real big.  Mostly projection bodies more than really big and strong early on.

http://www.northsidebaseball.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59266 (http://www.northsidebaseball.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59266)  NSBB link from Simpson's previous start.  A poster who was at the game thought that simpson looked unimpressive, and thought that Jokisch looked faster and more dominant.  (Jokish was scouted with a mid/upper 80's fastball last draft.  Maybe he's gotten faster, that might be nice.)  Another poster said his cousin had been at the game, sat behind Fleita, and said that Fleita's gun had Simpson at 86 and 87. 

Maybe the poster was just lying.  Or maybe Fleita just decided to quit with the gun after his previous low-velocity start, so the "no radar gun" is a brand new simpson policy?  Or perhaps Fleita still guns, but doesn't tell and doesn't let the other pitchers do radar readings and pass them along?  (I think usually another rotation pitcher does charting and radar gun on days when they aren't scheduled.)   Or maybe Fleita was simply lying? 

I think the point may be fair that Simpson's velocity this spring may not be representative of what it will be in future, and that it isn't that problematic that he's not too fast now.  But the reality is probably that his velocity is down, otherwise they wouldn't be worried about having guns or having him try to overthrow to recover his missing velocity. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 27, 2011, 05:14:30 pm
JR, I think that Lofton is an ideal model for Szczur to aspire to.  Lofton really was a ping guy early on.  During his rookie year at age 25, and his IsoP was only like .080 during his first two seasons.  It wasn't until his 3rd year, when he was 27, that he got more than 5 HR's. 

Obviously he was an incredible player, so Szczur has little chance of  being so great.  Over his 5-year prime his worst batting average was .311, he OBP'd over .400 in three of those years, and over a 5-year stretch in Cleveland he was an incredible base stealer.  Huge volume (395 steals attempted in only 5 years), fabulous success ratio (over 82%).  When teams know you're stealing and you still succeed at high efficiency and volume, that creates runs. 

I can only imagine how fun that would be if Szczur turned into a guy like that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 27, 2011, 05:16:55 pm
Cabrera move is very surprising.  But McNutt still hasn't gotten going, Whitenack has really just gotten up to AA, Dolis got moved to pen, and Rusin and Raley haven't been too hot.  I wonder what the motive is, and who'll replace him.  Maybe just a roster filler like Chen. 

Or maybe it's part of a whole chain.  For example, Kirk moves up from peoria, bumps Struck up to Tenn, bumps Cabrera up to Iowa?  Maybe Loosen up from Arizona?  If there really are any linked promotions at lower levels, I guess we'll find out soon enough. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 05:24:01 pm
The career leader in wins..... how can they show the guy so little respect?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 27, 2011, 05:48:04 pm
Nasty weather here...will be surprised if Daytona gets the game in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 27, 2011, 06:32:16 pm
  Cubs' Hayden Simpson Out To Bust Myths In Debut

 By Ben Diggle
 May 27, 2011
 (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/email.gif)E-mail (?subject=Baseball%20America:%20Cubs%27%20Hayden%20Simpson%20Out%20To%20Bust%20Myths%20In%20Debut&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseballamerica.com%2Fonline%2Fminors%2Fclassification-reports%2Flow-class-a%2F2011%2F2611825.html) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/print.gif)Print
 
 PEORIA, ILL.—Hayden Simpson would like to clear up some myths regarding his background.
 
 "I don't know where all these different stories came from," said Simpson, a righthander the Cubs selected 16th overall in the 2010 draft who is in the midst of his first professional season with Peoria. "It's like it was printed once, and once that happened it became fact for everybody else to use."
 
 Myth No. 1: Coming out of Magnolia (Ark.) High, he was lightly recruited and his only option to continue his career was at hometown Southern Arkansas, an NCAA Division II program where his neighbor, Allen Gum, was head coach.
 
 "I had a lot of Big 12 schools on me and some SEC schools, too," Simpson said. "Arkansas wanted me to wait until spring to sign. I didn't want to wait until spring because I didn't want the recruiters always coming around during our season and disrupting our team, because we had a chance to be really good."
 
 As for Gum, he wasn't right next door.
 
 "We lived in the same neighborhood," Simpson said. "He came over and spent about two hours talking with me and what struck me was how much he cared about his players and his program. That's rare in college because some coaches, when you don't produce, just forget about you and move on to the next guy."
 
 Gum took in Simpson's two years at quarterback for the Magnolia High football team and liked what he saw.
 
 "I saw a winner and a field general," said Gum, now the head coach at Central Arkansas. "Even if he had been throwing 80 mph, he was going to win games because he was so competitive."
 
 The Perfect Match
 
 Indeed. Simpson went on to post a career record of 35-2, 2.39 with 323 strikeouts. He credits former SAU pitching coach Wes Johnson, who is now on Gum's staff at Central Arkansas, for helping him develop.
 
 "When coach Johnson came, that flipped the script," Simpson said. "He's such a charismatic guy and you want to work for him.
 
 "But, even better, he wants to work for you. He's the reason I am where I am today, and I tell him that every time I talk to him."
 
 Gum had high praise for Johnson's work with Simpson as well.
 
 "There's two things Wes Johnson does better than just about anybody else: increase a pitcher's velocity and help get pitchers ready mentally for the long college season," Gum said. "That's why he and Hayden were like two peas in a pod.
 
 "Wes tailors his programs to the individual and Hayden followed his to the letter."
 
 Myth No. 2: The Cubs shocked everyone by taking him so high. Most other teams had him rated him toward rounds 8-10.
 
 "Everything we had heard from the scouts that we had talked to was Rounds 2-3," Simpson said. "And the first round was never out of the question.
 
 "We knew the Cubs were a first-round possibility and we later found out that the Tampa Bay Rays and Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim were thinking about taking me there, too."
 
 If it weren't enough to have so many draft pundits questioning his lofty draft status, there was bad news looming.
 
 "About a month before our season ended, I got really sick for two-to-three weeks," Simpson said. "It seemed like a really bad cold or flu bug. I would go to class and I couldn't sit through it. I'd get cold sweats, my neck would ache, my back would ache."
 
 Those symptoms make his performance during the NCAA Division II playoffs even more impressive. In a regional semifinal, Cubs scouts watched his fastball hit 94-97 mph and he showed a biting, 80 mph slider and a 76 mph curveball.
 
 Recovery Time
 
 Following the draft, Simpson was flown up to Chicago to be introduced to the media and throw a bullpen at Wrigley Field.
 
 "I'd been feeling better, but after I threw my 'pen and signed my contract, I went out to sit in the stands and watch the game," said Simpson, who signed a below-slot deal for $1.06 million—about $500,000 below what MLB recommended. "After about two or three innings in the stands, I started to feel sick again.
 
 "I was so sick that I left the park and then had to leave a dinner later that night with team executives."
 
 Simpson returned home after meeting with the Cubs doctors, who said they would monitor him for mononucleosis. Once home, his symptoms continued to worsen.
 
 "It got so bad that I had to sleep in the bathtub because I was vomiting so much and because I was sick of sweating through the sheets every night," Simpson said.
 
 Doctors eventually diagnosed him with mononucleosis, but that didn't help Simpson.
 
 "For three months, I was just spent, I had no energy and couldn't even eat solid food," Simpson said. "I could barely eat yogurt."
 
 Not until Thanksgiving was Simpson eventually cleared to resume full baseball activities.
 
 "By that time, I'd missed everything, even instructs," Simpson said. "But that might have been the best thing for me after I threw so many innings during the college season."
 
 Simpson finally resumed his routine this spring. And although he hasn't flashed the same velocity with Peoria, Simpson's coaches and teammates are still raving about him.
 
 "He's got a great work ethic," Chiefs catcher Micah Gibbs said. "And that's the first thing you need to be a frontline starter in the big leagues.
 
 "Plus, he's got pitchability. He's got four plus pitches that he can throw for a strike at any time."
 
 Simpson was 1-1, 4.05 in 40 innings for the Chiefs and was splitting his starts with lefthander Eric Jokisch, an 11th-round selection who started 6-0, 2.44.
 
 "Hayden has done everything we've asked him to and followed our plan," Chiefs manager Casey Kopitzke said. "Hayden's fun to watch because he's got a fire that burns inside of him."

  Ben Diggle is a freelance writer based in Peoria 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 27, 2011, 06:39:32 pm
Very interesting story.  I wouldn't wish that on anybody.  Thanks, JR
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 27, 2011, 06:54:24 pm
Geovany Soto was 0-3 with a strikeout in his Tennessee rehab game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 27, 2011, 07:34:22 pm
Mazerowski would never have made the HOF if he hadn't hit arguably the greatest homer of all-time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on May 27, 2011, 07:43:01 pm
Thanks for the Fleita link, some interesting stuff there.  Comments on Bour being in better shape and looking better defensively, that's interesting. I can't remember many Cub prospects who were real big.  Mostly projection bodies more than really big and strong early on.

http://www.northsidebaseball.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59266 (http://www.northsidebaseball.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59266)  NSBB link from Simpson's previous start.  A poster who was at the game thought that simpson looked unimpressive, and thought that Jokisch looked faster and more dominant.  (Jokish was scouted with a mid/upper 80's fastball last draft.  Maybe he's gotten faster, that might be nice.)  Another poster said his cousin had been at the game, sat behind Fleita, and said that Fleita's gun had Simpson at 86 and 87. 

Maybe the poster was just lying.  Or maybe Fleita just decided to quit with the gun after his previous low-velocity start, so the "no radar gun" is a brand new simpson policy?  Or perhaps Fleita still guns, but doesn't tell and doesn't let the other pitchers do radar readings and pass them along?  (I think usually another rotation pitcher does charting and radar gun on days when they aren't scheduled.)   Or maybe Fleita was simply lying? 

I think the point may be fair that Simpson's velocity this spring may not be representative of what it will be in future, and that it isn't that problematic that he's not too fast now.  But the reality is probably that his velocity is down, otherwise they wouldn't be worried about having guns or having him try to overthrow to recover his missing velocity. 

Ive seen Oneri Fleita a 100 times and talked to him almost every time and Ive NEVER seen him use a radar gun.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 08:26:13 pm
  Cubs' Hayden Simpson Out To Bust Myths In Debut

 
 Myth No. 2: The Cubs shocked everyone by taking him so high. Most other teams had him rated him toward rounds 8-10.
 
 "Everything we had heard from the scouts that we had talked to was Rounds 2-3," Simpson said. "And the first round was never out of the question.
 
 "We knew the Cubs were a first-round possibility and we later found out that the Tampa Bay Rays and Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim were thinking about taking me there, too."

Obvious lies.  Everyone knows he wouldn't have been drafted for at least the first 10 rounds and that the Cubs only drafted him to save money and take a pick no one had expected.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 08:28:48 pm
Mazerowski would never have made the HOF if he hadn't hit arguably the greatest homer of all-time.

While that may be true, the WS homerun did not help help make it to the All Star game 7 times.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 27, 2011, 09:02:24 pm
Whitenack with a 1-hit shutout in the 3rd, removed from the game after a groundout to the second baseman, according to the game recount. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 09:30:12 pm
There was a substantial difference in the kind of baseball it took to win when Mazerowski and Fox were playing.  The mound was substantially higher at that time, and as a result, scoring was substantially less.  If you could score 3 runs in a game, you had a decent chance to win.  So defense became a major part of the game.  The Orioles could live with a Mark Belanger 210 BA bacause he kept scoring in check.  They got good value from Paul Blair because of his defense.

Defense is still important, but no ML team could live with either player as a regular today.  If a player isn't good offensively, he isn't going to be used much on a good team, with the rare exceptions of the teams that are so good offensively that they can afford the luxury of such a player.

Mazerowski, who some consider to be the best defensive second baseman in history, would be considered a second rate player on the few teams that would play him regularly.

Without disputing how Mazerowski might be viewed today, the league average of runs per game for each team in 1965 in the NL was 4.1.  That is what it is in the NL right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 09:55:11 pm
And while Jackson might be given a job next year, and hopefully will improve and respond well and work out and next year will be a rebuilding year anyway....

While rebuilding would be nice next year, it really should have begun THIS year, and I would have begun it at the end of 2006.  Unfortunately lots of folks will look at next year not as a season for rebuilding, but a season when, because some FA contracts come of the books, the team should saddle itself with another wave of them....  Exhibit A:

As far as Marlon Byrd goes, maybe some team will lose their center fielder and trade for him.  That will free up even more 2012 money.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2011, 10:02:21 pm
If both of those dudes can handle third base defensively, I wonder if the Cubs would consider platooning them next season.  No, Jes, that's not a "rebuilding" post.   Considering the offensive production around the Majors at third this season (or lack thereof) a Flaherty/LeMahieu platoon might give the Cubs an anti-awful cheap #8 hitter combination in 2012.

While I would be happy to see such a platoon, thinking that you are going to replace your cleanup hitter (even if a very poor version of a cleanup hitter this season) with a platoon like that without it being a real rebuilding season (or making a very foolish major move in the FA market) is simply not realistic.

Now, speaking of very foolish FA moves, Pujols has not only not improved his OPS in the last two weeks, it has fallen another 43 points, down to .737.

Even if that is where he ends up for the season, some team is going to cough up mega-bucs for the guy, and may end up crippling their team for years.  I am hoping it is not the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 27, 2011, 10:21:16 pm
Whitenack reportedly bent over and called for help from the dugout before leaving.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_27_msbaax_tenaax_2

Lake: 2-5, 3B, HR, 5 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_27_braafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Kirk: 6-4-2-2-0-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_27_peoafx_cedafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 27, 2011, 10:22:26 pm
Flaherty: 2B, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_27_msbaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_27_iowaaa_rreaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 27, 2011, 10:36:29 pm
Luis Flores with yet another home run tonight, and his batting average is up to .550.

Did Flores go visit some of Barry Bonds' doctors this offseason?  Perhaps he's a fluke, but that guy is on one serious tear right now. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 28, 2011, 12:08:02 am
I thought I'd take a look at the greatest leadoff hitter the Cubs have had since I've been a fan, Kenny Lofton, to see if I could find any points of comparison with a guy like Szczur (BTW what a shame it is that three months of Kenny Lofton is the greatest period of leadoff hitting in my 21 years of Cub fandom.).

21 years?  Curt has underwear older than that.  In fact, I think he was wearing them today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 28, 2011, 12:13:50 am
Okay, Dave, now you have to put your comments AFTER the final
Quote
.

And, yes, I do have underwear older than that.

Thanks for the chauffering today, Dave.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 28, 2011, 12:14:44 am
Whitenack looked to be in some serious pain around the elbow area when he left tonights game, Cabrera is on his way to Iowa as we speak....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 28, 2011, 12:22:54 am
Okay, Dave, now you have to put your comments AFTER the final
Quote
.

And, yes, I do have underwear older than that.

Thanks for the chauffering today, Dave.

Like this?

And you're welcome.  But your not as good looking as Badger.

Or Boris.

Or Phylis Diller.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 28, 2011, 12:25:33 am
Something's still not right there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 28, 2011, 12:25:52 am
Like this?

And you're welcome.  But your not as good looking as Badger.

Or Boris.

Or Phylis Diller.

It should look like this.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 28, 2011, 12:26:38 am
Something's still not right there.

I knew I shouldn't have tried to follow Curt's directions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 28, 2011, 12:26:56 am
Got it that time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 28, 2011, 12:27:50 am
2.5 hour delay on Amtrak.  Broke a hose.  We got into Springfield an hour late.  I told the conductor, for a 2.5 hour delay to be only an hour late is pretty impressive.  He really flew.  He corrected me, "she"  She really flew.  Funny, never considered a woman engineer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 28, 2011, 08:27:09 am
Whitenack looked to be in some serious pain around the elbow area when he left tonights game, Cabrera is on his way to Iowa as we speak....

Thanks for sharing that info, unfavorable as it may be.  And welcome to the board. 

By the way, if you were at the games last night and if you're at liberty to share, can you share any observations on Beliveau, the lefty who pitched the last inning of game 2?    He's been a very effective strikeout lefty throughout his several years in the system, and I've thought might be interesting as a lefty reliever for the Cubs someday.  But I don't think I've heard a report from somebody who actually saw him pitch.  He's always been a high-walks guy, but this year that's been way better.  (35K/10 walks/28 innings between daytona and Tennessee). 

Questions:
1.  Does he look notably fast, or slow, or did his velocity look fairly unexceptional, not so great that it stood out but not so slow that it's a problem either?  If there was a stadium gun, how did he show on that, if you recall, compared to other guys who pitched?

2.  Does he look like he has some excellent breaking pitch?  (My assumption has been that since he was not a high draft pick, that he's getting the K's more on a good breaking ball than on an overpowering fastball.)

3.  Does he look big, small, or what?  He lists at 6'1", 190", but those listings are often inflated for short guys or obsolete for guys who may have grown since they were signed. 

4.  Any observation on his delivery?  For example, a funky deceptive delivery that might explain why his fastball is more effective than I'd expect based on mph alone? 

5.  Related to 4, but any observation on his arm angle?  Ordinary, or some lower stuff that might be tough on lefties? 

If you have any observations or thoughts, and are at liberty to share them, we'd all appreciate that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 28, 2011, 08:36:39 am
I am usually at 3-4 Smokies games per series so not a problem.....He looks good everytime he pitches, nice explosion out of the hand and I think that is the key for his success.....He does have a nice breaking ball but is a little guy, he definitely looks small than 190 to me. Didn't really notice the radar that is out in leftfield but he pitched well.....

I do have to say in addition Jae Hoon Ha is one of the fastest cats that I have ever seen and we had Campana all year last year. Also I believe Soto is staying to play the entire game tonight unless something changes this afternoon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 28, 2011, 10:59:20 am
I do have to say in addition Jae Hoon Ha is one of the fastest cats that I have ever seen and we had Campana all year last year.

Thanks cwells.  That's really interesting, given that: 
a) he's been a low-volume and terrible base stealer (6 for 14 this year, 9 for 13 last year, 5 for 10 at Boise),
b) that the Cubs tried him at catcher first,
c) the Baseball America type stuff hasn't talked up his speed,

I hadn't appreciated that he was that fast.  So you think he might be fast enough to stay in center field?  I think I'd been going under the assumption that he played center field well in the minors, but that in the majors where the standards are so high and when he might get a little bigger and lose a half step, that he would really project as a RF.  But if he's really got excellent speed, and the great arm, and good outfielding instincts, maybe he really can be an asset defensively as a big-league CFer?   

If you go to so many games, let me ask a couple more questions:
1.  Flaherty, where do you think he might play defensively in the majors?  OK but a little big/slow for 2b, or just fine, or even quite good?  In the outfield, does he look like he's got enough range?  He's hardly played 3B; from what you've seen do you think he'd have enough arm for 3B? 

2.  Lemahieu:  can you comment on his defense at 2B and 3B?  Same kind of questions, I guess. 
a)  Does he have a 3B arm? 
b)  We've gotten comments that he's been uncomfortable in past turning the DP at second.  What do you think? 
c)  Do you think he has the range/quickness/flexibility to play a good 2B?  Or do you think staying at 2B might be a problem? 

3.  Ridling is having a really nice season. How is he defensively at 1B, and do you think he has a major league bat, power, and glove? 

4.  Clevenger's been promoted, but that guy has hit and hit and hit.  Obviously he's a little guy who won't be a power hitter, but as a contact hitter his bat looks really good for a big-league future.  But how about his defense?  What do you think? 

5.  Last small Q:  Rhoderick.  Another smaller guy like Beliveau, I assume?  His numbers (1.59 ERA, 33K/28IP/1HR/14H) look interesting, and he's got a strong groundball stat thus far.  But his walks have been poor (15 on the season in only 28 innings, two last night, five in his last two outings.)  With all those K's and few hits, is he pretty fast and have a good breaking ball?  Or is it mostly his breaking ball that's killing minor league hitters?  And does he look too wild?  Or does his stuff look quite good, both velo and breaking pitch, so that IF he can harness his control he might be a good major league setup reliever?  I don't think we've really heard any observations on him as a pro. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 28, 2011, 11:41:54 am
I'm surprised Flaherty hasn't played more at 3B, since it's very possible he'd be a candidate for the starting job with the big club next year.  In fact, he's spent much of the year in the OF, which puzzles me and might indicate that the Cubs have already decided he's a utility guy.  Certainly they don't have a track record of valuing patience at the plate, and that's one of his strengths.  If it's an issue of not wanting to cost Lemahieu time at 3B, why not promote Flaherty to Iowa?

Lemahieu, OTOH, fits the classic Cub "empty calorie" profile - not much power and no walks - so it's no wonder they value him more.  He is two years younger, of course, and may just learn to take a few walks and develop a bit more power.  In my experience they don't usually learn patience - if they're this bad at 23, they're probably always going to be hackers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 28, 2011, 12:05:22 pm
Speaking of walks and hackers changing, it's interesting that hacking Ha has walked in four of his last five games. 

Not sure exactly when he moved to leadoff, but he hasn't been leading off for real long.  I'm guessing that after he was moved to leadoff, that either he was told or he decided for himself that a leadoff guy should focus more on getting on base and less on hitting HR's, and thus he's decided to take more pitches and accept walks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on May 28, 2011, 12:13:06 pm
That really sucks about Whitenack.

I havent seen him pitch but was planning to real soon and was starting to get excited about him.

Hope he's OK.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 28, 2011, 12:14:38 pm
I think that Tennessee has had him at leadoff pretty much right from the start.  I don't think he hit there at Daytona very much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 28, 2011, 01:28:56 pm
Thanks cwells.  That's really interesting, given that: 
a) he's been a low-volume and terrible base stealer (6 for 14 this year, 9 for 13 last year, 5 for 10 at Boise),
b) that the Cubs tried him at catcher first,
c) the Baseball America type stuff hasn't talked up his speed,

I hadn't appreciated that he was that fast.  So you think he might be fast enough to stay in center field?  I think I'd been going under the assumption that he played center field well in the minors, but that in the majors where the standards are so high and when he might get a little bigger and lose a half step, that he would really project as a RF.  But if he's really got excellent speed, and the great arm, and good outfielding instincts, maybe he really can be an asset defensively as a big-league CFer?   

If you go to so many games, let me ask a couple more questions:
1.  Flaherty, where do you think he might play defensively in the majors?  OK but a little big/slow for 2b, or just fine, or even quite good?  In the outfield, does he look like he's got enough range?  He's hardly played 3B; from what you've seen do you think he'd have enough arm for 3B? 

2.  Lemahieu:  can you comment on his defense at 2B and 3B?  Same kind of questions, I guess. 
a)  Does he have a 3B arm? 
b)  We've gotten comments that he's been uncomfortable in past turning the DP at second.  What do you think? 
c)  Do you think he has the range/quickness/flexibility to play a good 2B?  Or do you think staying at 2B might be a problem? 

3.  Ridling is having a really nice season. How is he defensively at 1B, and do you think he has a major league bat, power, and glove? 

4.  Clevenger's been promoted, but that guy has hit and hit and hit.  Obviously he's a little guy who won't be a power hitter, but as a contact hitter his bat looks really good for a big-league future.  But how about his defense?  What do you think? 

5.  Last small Q:  Rhoderick.  Another smaller guy like Beliveau, I assume?  His numbers (1.59 ERA, 33K/28IP/1HR/14H) look interesting, and he's got a strong groundball stat thus far.  But his walks have been poor (15 on the season in only 28 innings, two last night, five in his last two outings.)  With all those K's and few hits, is he pretty fast and have a good breaking ball?  Or is it mostly his breaking ball that's killing minor league hitters?  And does he look too wild?  Or does his stuff look quite good, both velo and breaking pitch, so that IF he can harness his control he might be a good major league setup reliever?  I don't think we've really heard any observations on him as a pro.

Ryan has played mostly 2nd and short here and was the starting SS last night and showed nice range and in my opinion a + arm, I'm really glad they sent him back down last year and let him get his confidence back as it has done wonders for him this year in both the field and at the dish...He is easily the best hitter on the team right now. I believe he is gonna project as a utility player, while not favoring well for some it should speed him to the majors.

D.J. certainly looks more comfortable at 3rd than he does playing 2nd and seems to even hit better when playing 3rd. His arm is good and he has decent range, nothing spectacular but will occasionally get to the distant hit balls. I'd play him at 3rd all the time but again thats JMO.

Ridling is huge and slow. They played him in left field last night and absolutely blew my mind. He is a big strong kid with alot of pop and when he hits the baseball solid you know it. Speed is not a factor with him hopefully because he doesn't have any but he is a monster. He makes some nice picks and plays at 1st tho, so defensively he is very solid. Saying that, Vitters has been playing quite a bit at 1st lately and looks much better there than at 3rd. That is all I'm gonna say about that..

Clevenger has always been around here and seems like a good quality team guy. Very knowledgeable and will make a good coach somewhere one of these days.

Kevin pitched well last night and is effectively wild...Not tons of heat, kind of a Maddux style thrower more than a pitcher.....


I'll be heading out tonight to watch McNutt, and hoping he goes longer than 2-3 innings like has in his last couple of starts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 28, 2011, 03:03:45 pm
Thanks for the comments and reports, cwells52.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 28, 2011, 03:42:52 pm
I'm surprised Flaherty hasn't played more at 3B, since it's very possible he'd be a candidate for the starting job with the big club next year.  In fact, he's spent much of the year in the OF, which puzzles me and might indicate that the Cubs have already decided he's a utility guy.

It may also indicates that at least part of Cub management is clueless....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 28, 2011, 03:44:02 pm
DeRosa was a utility guy, and yet was rather valuable to the team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 28, 2011, 04:01:29 pm
Nice debut for Hatley at Daytona, K'd 3 of 4 batters. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 28, 2011, 04:05:06 pm
thanks, cwells, very helpful. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 28, 2011, 04:06:53 pm
Craig Dominican League Dominicans Dominican Summer League DSL Signing Bonuses DSL Cubs1 cubs1 Cubs 1  (heh I'm trying to put in some key words so I can find this later. 


Note:  See JR's post #3 to get BA reports on these specific players. 


The following is taken from nsbb:   http://www.northsidebaseball.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59304
-----------------------
Looking at the DSL Rosters, here's where the 6-figure bonus players are:

DSL Cubs 1:

2B Carlos Penalvar - $550,000 bonus, DOB: 5/17/94
3B Jeimer Candelario - $500,000 bonus, DOB: 11/24/93
OF Jeffrey Baez - $350,000 bonus, DOB: 10/30/93
SS Francisco Sanchez - $350,000 bonus, DOB: 12/17/93
LHP Angel Mejias - DOB: 10/30/93
RHP Alexander Santana - DOB: 10/23/93
SS Antonio Gonzalez - DOB: 1/27/94

DSL Cubs 2:

RHP Gilberto Abreu - 8/8/93

As an aside, some of the DSL Cubs 1 and 2 rosters are inaccurate and still have last year's players, like Gioskar Amaya, Starling Peralta, Willengton Cruz, Amaury Paulino, Marco Hernandez and Willson Contreras who are all at Fitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 28, 2011, 05:04:46 pm
DeRosa was a utility guy, and yet was rather valuable to the team.

He certainly was, but an opening the Cubs are likely to have next year which is more significant that a utility player is thirdbaseman, a position where Flaherty has so far fielded two chances this year.  Considering the multi-million dollar decision the Cubs will need to make on ARam's option (which to me would seem a pretty simple decision), it might make sense to look to see who within the organization might be a decent candidate to fill that role in 2012.

Flaherty has played 75 games at 3B so far in the minors, but it would seem to make sense to give him more work since his fielding percentage there so far has been only .904.  And even if the Cubs have written him off entirely at 3B as a starter, if his role really is going to be utility, it would seem to make sense to get him some games at 3B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 28, 2011, 05:55:25 pm
So, who do we want in the draft?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 28, 2011, 06:11:09 pm
3B Jeimer Candelario -- I am rooting for this kid simply because that name is bada$$.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 28, 2011, 06:13:03 pm
So, who do we want in the draft?

I honestly don't know much about the draft this year.  I expect to read up on it this week so that I can be disappointed in the first round pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 28, 2011, 06:39:58 pm
When is the draft?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 28, 2011, 06:49:55 pm
I wanna say the draft is a week from Tuesday but I'm not totally sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 28, 2011, 06:51:18 pm
Nope, it's a week from Monday at 7pm EDT.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 28, 2011, 07:03:59 pm
Piece on Justin Bour:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/baseball-insider/post/from-the-farm-george-mason-graduate-justin-bour-is-crushing-florida-state-league-pitching/2011/05/27/AG1EGjCH_blog.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 28, 2011, 07:56:48 pm
DeRosa was a utility guy, and yet was rather valuable to the team.

DeRosa was an everyday player when he was with the Cubs - he just had the ability to fill in wherever he was needed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 28, 2011, 08:03:53 pm
Interesting article on Bour, but for those of us impressed by his numbers, the most enlightening part may be this:

The D-Cubs play at Jackie Robinson Ballpark, the only stadium in the league that doesn’t house a major league team for spring training. Therefore, the franchise is run more like a traditional minor league club and the dimensions are more friendly (315 and 325 feet down the lines, 400 feet to center field).

The 6-foot-4, 250-pound Bour has hit 11 of his 13 homers at home....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 28, 2011, 08:34:26 pm
McNutt: 7-3-0-0-2-2

Carpenter: 2-2-3-3-1-0, HR, (L)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_28_msbaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_28_iowaaa_rreaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 28, 2011, 08:41:29 pm
Colvin is only hitting .244 in Iowa.

Not good.  But at least he is getting regular playing time to work things out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 28, 2011, 09:11:31 pm
DeRosa was an everyday player when he was with the Cubs - he just had the ability to fill in wherever he was needed.

Perhaps that is what they have in mind with Flaherty.  Also, who knows what we will do this winter.  If we train Flaherty for third and then sign a third baseman, Flaherty is stuck in the minors.  If he can play several positions, like DeRosa, they can find a spot for him where he is needed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 28, 2011, 09:54:17 pm
And if Flaherty doesn't get more time at 3B this season, then it would be foolish to put him at 3B in the majors next season, regardless how well he hits the rest of this season, even if the team were going with the kind of complete rebuilding approach I would like to see.

The only sensible reasons I can see with them not playing him at 3B is that they have concluded there is simply no way he could ever play 3B in the majors, even in a utility role, that he is simply too abominably bad there, or that while they do believe he might one day play there right now they are more concerned that he continue to develop his hitting and that when he plays 3B it is tough enough for him that it hurts his hitting.... and that second possibility doesn't make much sense considering the way they are bouncing him around over the rest of the field.  Which again gets back to not making much sense to give him playing time at 3B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 28, 2011, 10:21:11 pm
Szczur: 4-5, 2 2B, RBI, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_28_peoafx_cedafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Crawford: 3-4, 2B, RBI, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_28_braafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 28, 2011, 10:46:41 pm
Two doubles and a stolen base for Szczur.

That's a nice day's work.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 28, 2011, 11:28:49 pm
A nice outing tonight for McNutt who was in a pitchers duel against Paul Clemens for MS......Flaherty started at 2nd and was moved to RF in the 7th when Harper when sub happy trying to get a run pushed across. McNutt was consistently in the low 90s and his breaking ball was working well, he did walk a couple but nothing outrageous. Not sure who was calling the pitches whether it was Soto or Mason, but they continually called fastball for Carpenter and one of the Braves finally caught up with it and that was the ballgame. Ridling was once again in right field and Spencer who is noticably slimmed down was the starting CF and made several nice diving grabs and actually covered alot of ground. Hoon-Ha was used as a pinch runner and was picked off after falling asleep on first, a bad mistake that cost the Smokies in the 7th after starting off with a solid base hit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 28, 2011, 11:40:22 pm
From that Bour article (hope he makes the Cubs, because his name is perfect to discribe this "team" ... aka Bour-ing):

"The 6-foot-4, 250-pound Bour has hit 11 of his 13 homers at home, but his road numbers are solid, too, at .299 with a .349 on-base percentage and .474 slugging percentage. Nine of his 14 doubles have come on the road."

Those road numbers are likely a more accurate picture of Bour, I would think.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 28, 2011, 11:46:26 pm
Quick update on the guys dealt for Garza:

Chirnos is stinking up AAA.  Guyer is doing the exact opposite, w/ around 8 HRs and an OBP of over .400.  Archer is currently getting destroyed in AA, with a WHIP over 1.8 and an ERA around 6.  Lee ... well .. its best not to know what he's doing because it will make you sad.

Still want to know?  He has an OBP over .450 in over 150ABs.  His OPS is .980.  Yikes.  If it makes you feel any better, he has stolen 14 but been caught 7.  If it makes you feel worse, don't forget, he was possibly going to push Castro to second because he's such a great defender.  Also, he's a 1990 birth date, and doing this in High A.

Go Cubs! 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 29, 2011, 12:00:31 am
Lee was my #1 prospect before he was traded, because rangy SS's who run and hit well are far more likely to succeed than any pitching prospect. I didn't like the trade when it was made, and I still don't.

Garza's had rotten luck so far, but this team isn't going anywhere this year or next (and beyond), even if he becomes a dominant #1. He'll be a free agent before the Cubs are legitimate contenders. He'll probably be long since retired by then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 29, 2011, 12:08:56 am
I've been paying little attention to the Cubs, so in reading some stuff I've come across a few notes that I don't recall reading here:

From NSBB:

Sickels:
**Chicago Cubs outfield prospect Matt Szczur is on a tear for Low-A Peoria, hitting .405 in his last 10 games, stealing seven bases in that stretch. Overall, he's hitting .336/.407/.395 with 12 steals in 13 attempts, with a 14/11 BB/K in 119 at-bats. Drafted in the fifth round last year from Villanova, Szczur is an excellent athlete with blazing speed. This helps him on the bases obviously, and he's also a very strong defensive outfielder. He has a feel for the strike zone and makes contact; about the only flaw is a lack of home run power, though he's shown considerable pop in batting practice and scouts think more homers could come eventually. His name would be worth 26 points in Scrabble.

From Baseball america:
• The Cubs paid $1 million to sign Cuban center fielder Rubi Silva in December, and he's come as advertised: an athletic guy who can put the bat to the ball with gap power and a free-swinging approach. Silva homered and hit a double in a 2-for-3 day yesterday for high Class A Daytona, bringing his season line to .280/.296/.415 in 39 games between Daytona and low Class A Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 29, 2011, 12:12:40 am
Bottom line, that trade felt like desperation.  It's a deal you make when you're the Red Sox or Yankees ... when you can legitimately compete for the World Series.  It's not a trade you make when you are a mediocre team whose main problem isn't starting pitching.  Replacing Gozelanny with Garza hasn't made the Cubs better than even the Pirates.  If Lee continues to play well, the Cubs could have been set at 2B and SS for a decade with plus players.

Let's play the What if game further, because the What Now game sucks:  Image a top of the order in 4 years of Lee/Szcur/Castro.  That could have been something ... and when you're a poor team ... you have to hold on to your Ace cards and hope. 

Maybe the Rays will give the Cubs back Lee next year in exchange for Garza?  You have to hope you get some decent guys in return when that trade comes down, and it had better happen b/c if he walks and you get picks ... THAT'S just what the Cubs need. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 29, 2011, 10:27:47 am
John Gaub (2-1) was perfect over the final two innings last night and was credited with the win.  Gaub struck out Brad Nelson to end the game, keeping his streak intact of at least one strikeout in all 18 of his appearances.  He has fanned 38 batters in 21.1 innings and leads all PCL relievers with a 16.03 strikeouts per nine innings ratio.

I'd still be curious to learn why Gaub is used less than what would seem to be a normal amount.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 29, 2011, 10:38:16 am
Like I said, you could taken the other kids out of that deal and I wouldn't have given them Lee for Garza straight up.  Of all the Hendry disasters, that one may end up being the one with legs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 29, 2011, 01:29:37 pm
On Bour hitting 11 of his 13 homers at home, I'm not sure that's as big of a deal as it sounds.

Here are minor league park factors from 2007-2010.  Daytona has a 1.15 park factor for home runs, which means home run totals are enhanced by 15% there.

http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/oracle/discussion/2010_minor_league_park_multipliers/ (http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/oracle/discussion/2010_minor_league_park_multipliers/)

So basically if Bour is being helped by his home park by 15%, basically it means he loses 1 or 2 homers?  It still means he's having a heck of a season regardless.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on May 29, 2011, 01:38:58 pm
Was at the Daytona game last night and finally got to see Bohr at 1st. He had been the DH in all the previous games I was at. He didn't really have any chances in the field with the exception of a routine pop up. He did dig a bad throw from Lake out of the dirt. Somebody questioned his speed awhile back and I got to see that first hand. He runs pretty well for a big guy. His double in the seventh drove in the tying and had there not been two outs he probably would have settled for a single. The ball was hit on a line between the center and right fielders and he managed to leg out a double and put himself in scoring position. He nearly had another hit and rbi in the first inning. he hit a solid grounder up the middle but a hit and run was called and it led the ss right to the bag and he was able to field it. His fly out in the 4th was hit right on the button and was a hard line drive hit right at the center fielder.  Speaking of speed Cerda showed some last night as well. The winning run scored in the bottom of the ninth when Cerda grounded to the pitcher who proceeded to throw it into right field. Cerda made it all the way around to third without a play. He scored on a sac fly but he really was moving getting around to third base. With all that said, Lake really needs to grow up. He got called out on a 3rd strike early in the game and was jawing with the umpire. He paid the price as every close pitch went against him the rest of the game. Going again tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 29, 2011, 02:28:05 pm
Key - If you see him, can you give a report on Silva?  How is he defensively.  And is he as much of a hacker as his stats seem to indicate?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 29, 2011, 02:53:05 pm
Ceasar with a home run today.  With power like that, how can you keep him down on the farm?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2011, 04:13:42 pm
Cabrera not good in his AAA debut.

Clevenger: 3-5, HR, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_29_iowaaa_rreaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb



Smokies off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 29, 2011, 04:18:52 pm
Only the Cubs would keep Steve Clevenger at AAA with Koyie Hill on the major league roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2011, 05:03:07 pm
Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_29_peoafx_cedafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2011, 05:15:27 pm
BA's latest mock draft has the Cubs taking HS pitcher Archie Bradley. I find this absurd considering Bradley's reported asking price.

Perfect Game:

Quote
9. Chicago Cubs - Derek Starling

The Cubs reportedly have set their sights on Starling and Lindor. Lindor isn't expected to make it past the top five to seven picks, but Starling could inject some much-needed athleticism and star power into their system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 29, 2011, 05:21:35 pm
There was an article in the Nebraska newspapers this morning that the quarterback situation at Nebraska is separating the men from the boys and that if Starling passes on the draft he is in the qb running for the Huskers.  Just sayin'.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 29, 2011, 05:27:37 pm
BA's latest mock draft has the Cubs taking HS pitcher Archie Bradley. I find this absurd considering Bradley's reported asking price.

So what is the asking price?  And how good is Bradley?  I haven't heard of him, but don't follow draft prospects very closely so not hearing of him doesn't mean much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on May 29, 2011, 06:24:29 pm
I'll be shocked if Starling ever plays QB for the Huskers.  If he was playing defense for Pelini I could maybe see it, but it isn't a crackerjack offensive staff down there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 29, 2011, 06:27:05 pm
I wonder what buff will be thinking if the Cubs draft Starling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on May 29, 2011, 06:27:14 pm
Bradley is asking for around $20 million.  He's a Sooner QB commit with a high 90's fastball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 29, 2011, 06:52:11 pm
Gibbs BA has come back down to earth at Peoria, currently at 284.  But one interesting stat.  He is walking about 20% of the time.  With 3 today, he has 24 walks and 20 strike outs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 29, 2011, 08:46:27 pm
Rumor going around that the Cubs have called DJ up....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 29, 2011, 08:53:04 pm
http://www.northsidebaseball.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=59311
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 29, 2011, 09:16:07 pm
LeMahieu is obviously hitting well, but he's definitely not a finished product yet.  I'm not sure why you'd bring him up at this point ahead of someone like Bobby Scales, other than for Hendry to show the world how great his farm system is. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2011, 09:25:30 pm
Ole friend Donnie Veal mowing down the D-Cubs:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_29_braafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 29, 2011, 09:42:39 pm
Baker to the dl and LeMahieu up....Congrats to him   8)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 29, 2011, 09:56:51 pm
If he is going to be up here, I hope they actually play him.  And with Barney doing well, I'm not sure how much playing time he will get.

I would have thought that Flaherty would have been a more sensible call up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 29, 2011, 11:06:34 pm
Why would you call up DJ ahead of Flaherty?  Do the Cubs really hate walks that much?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 29, 2011, 11:16:01 pm
They're replacing Baker, so they want to do it with a RH bat. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 30, 2011, 12:26:06 am
LeMahieu story

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0530-bits-cubs-pirates-chicago20110529,0,4776975.story (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0530-bits-cubs-pirates-chicago20110529,0,4776975.story)

He's not on the 40-man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 30, 2011, 01:26:05 am
One possibility is moving Marlon Byrd to the 60-day DL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 30, 2011, 01:54:44 am
Bradley is asking for around $20 million.  He's a Sooner QB commit with a high 90's fastball.

I'm retired and have no worthwhile athletic skills, but I could ask for $200 million. If Bradley was really worth $20 million, he'd be the consensus top pick of the draft, and would be long gone before the Cubs got a chance to draft him.

If the Cubs did draft him and he didn't sign, they'd have another high draft choice in 2012.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 30, 2011, 01:57:39 am
They're replacing Baker, so they want to do it with a RH bat. 

What, we'd be too left-handed if we recalled Flaherty? Didn't we waste millions on Fuku, Bradley and Pena because we were too right-handed?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 30, 2011, 03:55:29 am
Robert Whitenack has a strained elbow. Nick Struck is going to Tenn to take his place for the time being.

Jae Hoon Ha will go back to Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 30, 2011, 07:51:15 am
Interesting, I thought they wanted to keep Jae with TN even when Jackson comes back which is supposed to be today from what Vitters was telling me Saturday....I know he has struggled but that would give us around 6 outfielders
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on May 30, 2011, 08:42:47 am
JR since you asked I would love for the cubs to draft Starling as I think he would be stupid to pass up say 5 million dollars to play football at nebraska.  I doubt he is around when the cubs pick as rumors here are there is absolutly no way he gets past Kansas City.  He is already a local legend in the Kansas City area.  No way the Royals pass on that PR bonanza especially now that there is so much hope in the fan base with all the young guys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 30, 2011, 09:00:22 am
After doing next to nothing for Daytona, C Luis Floris has gone crazy for Tennessee (so far)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=&sid=t553&t=p_pbp&pid=457745
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 30, 2011, 09:01:42 am
Okay, buff, turn in your "I Luv Big Red" badge and your Cornhuskers Forever membership card.  I'm turning you in!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 30, 2011, 09:08:22 am
After doing next to nothing for Daytona, C Luis Floris has gone crazy for Tennessee (so far)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=&sid=t553&t=p_pbp&pid=457745

He has hit well but I'd like to see what would happen as more of an everyday player....He doesn't play all that much with Lalli doing the majority of the catching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 30, 2011, 09:17:20 am
Memorial Day.  Thanks for those of you who have served.  DaveP, I know you did, so thanks for that. 

Interesting with DJ called up. Very surprising.  I guess four things could go in his favor:
*1.  He's going to stay on the 40-man, and will be able to conveniently yo-yoed (sp?) as circumstances change.  With Scales, I imagine it's a hassle to roster him, then to need to waive and deroster the next time a new callup is required. 
*2  Like Baker, he's a 2B/3B guy.  As has been mentioned, Flaherty hasn't been playing any 3B this year.  Perhaps he's not played 3rd at Tenn because he's not equipped.  Or perhaps he's simply not played 3rd because they've chosen to split the 3B action between Vitters and DJ. But even if his long-term tools are OK for 3B, I don't imagine they want him in the majors to play a position that he hasn't practiced. 
*3  He's been a pure contact hitter consistently, and pure contact hitters have the easiest time continuing to make contact after a promotion.  Nobody declines less following a promotion than a contact hitter.  Flaherty with more contact challenges might have more trouble initially sustaining following a promotion.

*4  To some degree, I think this may actually be very important and good for Flaherty to NOT be promoted.He's older and has less time to waste.  He's having a breakout season, but I think there remain questions of how real he is, whether he can sustain, and what might be expected from him.  If called up, he might sit for a month and go 4/17 and nobody will know if it means anything, and then he might return rusty and not perform as well, and end the season with unexceptional AA numbers.  Then what will we know or be able to conclude?  Plus he's played hardly any 3B, and he's still played only a trace amount of LF/RF.  But by leaving him in AA, if he can sustain most of his early success, if he hits .300 with 24 HR and a .950 OPS, I think we might be more sure that his bat and his power are real.  And I think that if DJ is gone, they might give Samson his SS games and instead give Flaherty some 3B action (which might be good), and/or more LF/RF action (which might also be very good.) 

If Flaherty's bat was for real, a good average/OBP guy with HR power could be really valuable not only in 2B/3B, but in OF.  Post Fuku, wouldn't we like a good-hitting LH RF with power?  There would be a place for that.  With broken down Sori in left, if we had a good-hitting LH LF with power, he could get a lot of action and could enable Quade to DL or rest weak-legged Soriano more. 

So I guess I think not disrupting Flaherty's opportunity to play utility positions is really good, and I think not disrupting Flaherty's opportunity to  complete a full season of batting excellence is really desirable. 

Where with Lemahieu, I think we already kind of know what we're dealing with, a gifted contact hitter who plays 2b or 3B, with uncertain defensive quality. So if he misses a month, it doesn't make that much difference, and he'll probably return and resume being a good-contact hitter pretty quickly. 

he sits for a month in Wrigley and goes 3/15, then comes back and takes a couple of weeks to regain his equilibrium at Tenn, and ends up with AA numbers that aren't nearly as good as those he's posted thus far, what will we conclude?  That these 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 30, 2011, 09:20:02 am
wells, interesting deal with Ha going back down. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 30, 2011, 10:24:54 am
keysbear, thanks much for the Bour comments and observations.  That's encouraging and I'm surprised that you thought he ran pretty well (for a big guy), that he was whacking the ball even if on what looked like a single-hit game in the box score, and that he dug a bad throw from Lake.  That sounded fairly favorable. 

On Bour and park factor:  as JR notes, certainly Daytona has a modest HR factor.  I think those were helpful notes, JR, that a 115% factor might change one or two HR's, but not 11 of them.  And who knows, he might have crushed several that would be big-park HR's but went two feet foul.  (I think keysbear mentioned such a blast in an April game?)  The other reason that I doubt that Daytona dimensions are heavily responsible is that he's not a dead-pull hitter by any means.  Since I've gotten more interested in his HR output, I've checked the box scores, and his HR's seem to be distributed, but many list in the boxes as center, left center, right center.  I don't believe the center field and alleys in Daytona are short. 

Also, in his article Bour referred to the "smaller" park, but my sense was that he wasn't so much talking about the field/HR dimensions, so much as the stands.  The spring-training facilities are 'larger' in that they have more seats for spring-training fans.  But while Daytona's dimensions are a little small, I think when he talked about the niceness of a smaller park, I think he was talking about a smaller more intimate crowd feel than the actual field dimensions. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 30, 2011, 10:52:19 am
On Bour and park factor:  as JR notes, certainly Daytona has a modest HR factor.  I think those were helpful notes, JR, that a 115% factor might change one or two HR's, but not 11 of them.  And who knows, he might have crushed several that would be big-park HR's but went two feet foul.  (I think keysbear mentioned such a blast in an April game?)  The other reason that I doubt that Daytona dimensions are heavily responsible is that he's not a dead-pull hitter by any means.  Since I've gotten more interested in his HR output, I've checked the box scores, and his HR's seem to be distributed, but many list in the boxes as center, left center, right center.  I don't believe the center field and alleys in Daytona are short. 

The number of foul ball "HR" really makes no difference, since the foul lines are in the same place in every park, but SOMETHING would seem to be responsible for the 11-2 home/away HR difference, and while small sample size can be a factor, that is the kind of dramatic difference, with the number of home HR so out of line with his career #s (while the road HR are in line with career #s) that it is likely something else is at play.  The most obvious possibility would be those short fences down the lines.  The 115% HR effect that JR mentioned addresses norms, and not the effect on specific individuals.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 30, 2011, 11:01:28 am
wells, interesting deal with Ha going back down.

Possibly, the entire deal with getting picked off as a pinch runner on Saturday seemed to a bad setting point for him around here. You could tell the managers/coaches were really turned off with it...He completely fell asleep on first and possibly cost them the game. His BA has plummeted the last week and he has been stuggling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 30, 2011, 11:27:51 am
Craig - Thanks for your thoughts on the Lemahieu call-up.  I appreciate the way you tend to try to think through the possible reasons for such decisions, rather than give in to tempting knee-jerk reactions.   

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 30, 2011, 11:48:37 am
Rivals:

Quote
9. Chicago Cubs
The Pick: Taylor Guerrieri, RHP, North Augusta (S.C.) Spring Valley
The Buzz: Guerrieri has been on a steady climb up rankings boards since he was flirting with triple digits on the radar gun - and the Cubs like the power pitcher. He is currently committed to South Carolina so a signing bonus in the $2 million range is not out of the question.
Last Mock: Jed Bradley, LHP, Georgia Tech


http://highschool.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1220421
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 30, 2011, 11:52:44 am
So, the Cubs have been linked to Starling, Lindor, Guerrieri, Bundy, Gray, and both Bradleys.

Who else?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 30, 2011, 11:58:00 am
They didn't say that Whitenack was placed on the DL.  Perhaps they are hoping that he will only miss a start or two, and called up Struck for a few days.  In which case, I suppose they have to make room for him.

In addition, Ha was having a great year at Daytona.  At Tennessee, not so much.  It might be better for his progression if he gets to dominate his competition for a while.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 30, 2011, 12:00:35 pm
I agree that you don't want to bring up Flaherty just to sit him on the bench.  But that also goes for LaMehieu.  It is never a good idea to bring up one of your best prospects unless you are ready to play him close to full time.  LaMehieu can be hurt by ML rust also.

That is why you have marginal vets like Scales or LeHair in Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 30, 2011, 12:25:55 pm
I just noticed that Clevenger has been added back to our roster here in TN? What's that all about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 30, 2011, 12:40:49 pm
Just got my daily text update from the Smokies......

Jackson is back from the DL and they have added Clevenger, Junior Lake and Nick Struck as reported to the roster....Whitenack went to the DL and as reported HA back to Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brs2 on May 30, 2011, 12:41:48 pm
Meh...

Taylor Guerrieri, rhp
Spring Valley HS, Columbia, S.C.
Guerrieri will be one of the toughest calls for clubs in the first round. He has one of the draft's best arms, and among preps he ranks behind only Oklahomans Dylan Bundy and Archie Bradley in pure stuff. Guerrieri has a pitcher's body at 6-foot-3, 195 pounds with long arms, coat-hanger shoulders and present strength. Getting his "man strength," to use the scouting term, has allowed him to maintain his delivery better, and his stuff has improved as a result. At his best, Guerrieri's fastball touches 98 mph and sits in the 93-96 range. He throws his curveball with power as well at 80-83 mph. He flashes a changeup and a cutter in side sessions but rarely uses them in games. Like most high school pitchers, his velocity can vary from start to start, but he still sits 91-93 on his off days. His athleticism and strength allow him to repeat his delivery well, though his command is a question. A South Carolina signee, Guerrieri could go in the first 10 picks if teams are sold on his makeup, but many are not. He's on his second high school thanks to off-field incidents at North Augusta (S.C.) High, and scouts continue to research his decision-making.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 30, 2011, 12:56:55 pm
Brett Jackson Activated, Whitenack placed on DL;Lake & Struck Promoted to AA;Ha sent to D-Cubs;Clevenger to AA
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 30, 2011, 01:19:59 pm
So, instead of promoting Clevenger to the majors, they demote him to AA.

And promote Lake to AA while Bour stays at A+.

This is one dumb organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 30, 2011, 01:26:53 pm
I wouldn't promote Bour at this time, but I don't understand moving Clevenger back to AA. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 30, 2011, 01:28:00 pm
I wouldn't promote Bour at this time, but I don't understand moving Clevenger back to AA. 
Has to be related to Welington Castillo returning to Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 30, 2011, 01:33:26 pm
I suppose.  Based upon past history, he probably has a better chance for promotion to the ML from Tennessee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 30, 2011, 02:53:05 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_30_iowaaa_rreaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Daytona idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 30, 2011, 04:13:33 pm
Pitching for Peoria this afternoon, Greathouse struck out 6 in 2.2 innings, while shutting out the opposition on one hit.  However, he also walked 6.

Ceasar, the extra base machine, hit a double.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: sam hannam on May 30, 2011, 04:35:00 pm
Szczur also has another home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 30, 2011, 04:42:22 pm
How can he do that with no power?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 30, 2011, 05:20:48 pm
So if Ha is a airhead baserunner, maybe he fits right into the organization?  If Lake is moving up to Tenn, that might support the notion the possibility that Flaherty will shift from SS to 3B, now that Lemahieu isn't plugging up 3B. 

Szczur's BABIP is .363, high but not exceptional for a speedy contact hitter, who probably pads his BA with some bunts and infield hits, and as a contact hitter probably does hit a good amount of line drives.  So I don't imagine his BA is greatly fluky based on fluky-high BABIP. 

Hak Lee's BABIP is .426.  I love Lee, I wish we had him, and I think as a speedy good-hitting toolsy-defender who's only 20 and projectible he's a terrific prospect.  But I do think that his stats this spring are not so different from before, other than an astonishing BABIP which I doubt he'll sustain.  If you take his stats, but convert his BABIP to Szczur's .363, which as I said is quite high and probably also somewhat unsustainable, then Lee would be .305 batting average.  And his OPS would be in low .800's rather than .928.  An .820-OPS .305BA Lee is still a great prospect, of course.  But other than his BABIP being unbelievably higher than last year, his 18% K-rate and his scant XBH hit rate (13 XBH in 57 hits) plus his modest SB efficiency (14 for 21), suggests that he profiles very similarly to what he was last year. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on May 30, 2011, 05:28:53 pm
I would think they will slide Vitters into 3rd, Lake to short with Gonzalez and keep Flaherty at 2nd....JMO
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 30, 2011, 06:24:38 pm
They might.  But my guess is that they will continue to rotate most guys around to two spot. Will be interesting to watch how the do it.  I'd actually thought the DJ promotion would help to alleviate the glut and the multi-postion bopping.  But now having simply replaced him with Lake, I suspect it will continue and they want to work it that way. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 30, 2011, 07:47:06 pm
I just don't get why they don't use Ryan Flaherty at third base in AA.

They use him at shortstop, so it's not as if they think he doesn't have the arm or the range for third.

It's just weird that they don't use him over there.  I know they have Josh Vitters (*yawn*) and he split time with DJ LeMahieu, but Flaherty is potentially more of a classic third base power bat and he doesn't seem like a butcher from his defensive numbers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 30, 2011, 08:11:22 pm
So if Ha is a airhead baserunner, maybe he fits right into the organization? 


I must have missed a post.  When did we decide that HA was an airhead baserunner?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 30, 2011, 08:23:03 pm
Possibly, the entire deal with getting picked off as a pinch runner on Saturday seemed to a bad setting point for him around here. You could tell the managers/coaches were really turned off with it...He completely fell asleep on first and possibly cost them the game. His BA has plummeted the last week and he has been stuggling.

Dave, this was the post about the Ha baserunning. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 30, 2011, 08:35:23 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_30_peoafx_cedafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 30, 2011, 08:54:05 pm
If the Cubs promoted Jackson, Szczur, and Ha tomorrow, would that outfield be better than what we have now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 30, 2011, 09:17:32 pm
If the Cubs promoted Jackson, Szczur, and Ha tomorrow, would that outfield be better than what we have now?

What an easy question!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 30, 2011, 09:25:15 pm

Jackson: 0-4, 3 K

Vitters: 0-4, K, 2 E (3B)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_30_tenaax_hunaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 30, 2011, 09:42:33 pm
The Cubs need to give up on Vitters as a 3B.  That's never gong to happen.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 30, 2011, 10:05:45 pm
I hope Jackson has a good couple of weeks and gets called up soon - the opportunity is surely there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 31, 2011, 08:11:43 am
A-ball is not filled with power.  Szczur is now 7th in the 15-team Midwest League in OPS.  A league with that many players has only like 8 guys slugging .500 or better.  Of the 6 OPS guys ahead of him, one is a 20-year-old LF, there's another 21-year-old who's a couple weeks younger than Szczur, and the other four are all 22 -25. 

With power so limited in the Midwest League, not only is Szczur near the top in BA (3rd), OBP (4th), OPS (7th), and SB (10th), but his modest .460 slugging is actually 18th in the league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 31, 2011, 09:39:27 am
And you were writing him off as a banjo hitter....

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 31, 2011, 10:48:11 am
Draft is next Monday.  I know that everybody wants the "best available player" but I'm curious if anybody has any particular preference in terms of profile/position or the like.

Seveal mocks have Cubs taking Starling, who seems like a classic boom/bust type of prospect.  I guess it might be hard to resist him if he's stll on the board.  Most similar college player seems to be Springer, another multi-tool guy but reports say he may have a hole in his swing.

Then, there's the HS shortstop, Lindor, who everybody says will stay at SS.  Well, there's your Hak-Ju Lee replacaement if you're so inclined.  Another HS SS, Baez, supposedly will have to move to 3B but has the better bat.  I guess we could use a 3B bat, even with LeMahieu, Flaherty, Vitters, Lake, et al. 

Maybe the most likely pick is one of the many power pitchers at the top of the board, although reports seem to say that Wilken would prefer a position player this year.  Who knows with Wilken.  I just hope he drafts somebody that somebody has heard of at #9.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 31, 2011, 11:02:33 am
DO NOT WANT Starling.

Take one of the pitchers, please.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brs2 on May 31, 2011, 11:16:33 am
I suspect (but hope it's not) Sonny Gray. Cubs have a history with him, and he is undersized and not tabbed to be picked until later in the first round. I'd prefer Bundy or Bradley; don't want someone like Guerreri who has suddenly become hot and has more questions.  Otherwise, I'd prefer one of the other college arms. Starling would be exciting, but I have limited faith in the Cubs ability to develop high school hitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2011, 11:36:23 am
Bigger question:

Are we going to do all draft coverage in this topic? I'm assuming so since no new thread has been created.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 31, 2011, 01:06:40 pm
Adding a new  thread would be REALLY desirable
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 31, 2011, 02:15:05 pm
I could go for a dedicated draft thread.

I'm very much against Starling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 31, 2011, 02:27:36 pm
Before ruling out Starling, just remember that probably 80% of us didn't want any part of Brett Jackson and his strikeouts when we drafted him either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 31, 2011, 02:39:45 pm
DO NOT WANT Starling.

Take one of the pitchers, please.

I don't agree. 

We could sure use a really good pitcher, but as we know from experience good-armed pitching talent doesn't stay healthy for long. 

I'd rather get a middle-of-order hitter who, if he works, you can build a lineup around for a decade.  Not sure that Starling is that guy, what do I know.  But if there is reason to think that he can hit real pitching and won't have holes, I'd be very interested. 


Is there evidence that he's a K-guy?  I think with Harvey he'd already flashed some major K-holes before getting picked.  And I also think Jackson is a different story, since he'd been a consistent K-king through college, so he was pretty much a proven whiffer.  Is Starling a proven whiffer like that?  If so, of course stay far away. 

I know we've missed on lots of picks of all kinds.  But from very brief reading, he doesn't seem nearly as dumb and lazy as Vitters, or as dumb as Harvey.  I'm not saying that being a highly motivated hard worker/competitor enables a guy to hit pro pitching.  But being the opposite sure does hurt. 

Whatever we get, it will be somebody with a chance to be very good.  If it's a pitcher, hopefully it will be the freak who stays healthy. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 31, 2011, 03:05:24 pm
Doubtful that there's any way to know whether Starling has plate discipline or not based on numbers. 

The college version of Starling is George Springer.  He has 30 walks and 18 HBP {!!} in 219 ABs.  Got to like a guy who is not afraid to get hit. 36 of his 79 hits are for x-bases, including 12 homers.  31/38 in steal attempts.  Good OFer with good arm.  Springer started the season as a sure top 10 pick, got off to a poor start, and has rebounded.  Most mocks now have going in the second ten.

There was a report a few days ago that Cubs had a bunch of their scouts looking at Springer.  Not sure what that means, but if Wilken is focusing on a position player, he could be the guy. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on May 31, 2011, 03:11:56 pm
Starling will not be there to draft.  I'm telling you he doesn't go past KC at 4.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 31, 2011, 03:17:29 pm
Keith Law has been pretty certain that Kansas City will only be looking at college pitchers with their pick.  That's just one opinion, of course...but he seems to think Starling to KC is very doubtful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 31, 2011, 03:43:53 pm
Keith Law's latest mock . . .

Chicago Cubs

Bubba Starling, CF, Gardner-Edgerton HS, (Gardner, Kan.)

They've also been tied to George Springer, Javier Baez and Archie Bradley, although the latter seems unlikely with the Cubs saying they're focusing on hitters. They sent a small army in to see Springer at the Big East tournament.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 31, 2011, 04:04:56 pm
Starling is 6'5".  The list of successful major league hitters that tall is not a long one.

He's got Jeff Francoeur written all over him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on May 31, 2011, 04:14:14 pm
We're sure to get him, then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on May 31, 2011, 04:17:08 pm
Count me as one of the few on the board that would be happy to see the Cubs draft Bubba Starling.  The guy is an elite athlete and baseball player.  He can throw in the low 90s, can run with the wind, hit the ball a country mile and hit for contact.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 31, 2011, 04:19:20 pm
George Springer is interesting to me as a college hitter.

Starling just reminds me too much of Ryan Harvey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 31, 2011, 04:27:58 pm
As a projection, a Starling comp would be Jason Heyward--who is 6' 5" and athletic out of HS.  Of course, that would be optimistic.   :-\

I like a high-ceiling pick but I understand getting spooked by the Ryan Harvey-could-be-Dale Murphy-history.  Of course, most any pick is a bit of a crapshoot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 31, 2011, 04:35:42 pm
Law addressed a comment about the Starling/Harvey comparison in the comments section of his latest mock draft:

No comparison. Harvey was all bat, really all slug. Starling can run, throw, field, and control the zone a little.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 31, 2011, 04:37:23 pm
Starling can run, throw, field, and control the zone a little.

Unfortunately, as Craig likes to point out, none of that matters if you can't hit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 31, 2011, 05:14:47 pm
In addition to slugging potential, Harvey had a very strong arm and good speed.  I doubt if he was as fast as Starling is, but he had plus speed.

And a very long swing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 31, 2011, 05:33:19 pm
Augie Ojeda is back with the Iowa Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 31, 2011, 05:38:43 pm
SS Raphael Valdes is now with Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 31, 2011, 06:04:04 pm
Who in the world is ss Raphael Valdes?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 31, 2011, 06:09:06 pm
Recently signed Cuban defector.  He's been at Fitch Park for the past two weeks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 31, 2011, 06:10:51 pm
Starling can run, throw, field, and control the zone a little.

None of which matters if he can't hit.  :) 

Jeff, that's a good point that a lot of the tall guys are K-machines and can't hit.  Maybe he's different, I have no idea, but the scouts better have awfully good indication that he is. 

Every year there are a bunch of guys who are tall and fast and strong and athletic who go and play linebacker and tight end and safety in hundreds of colleges, and who are big guards or small forwards on hundreds of college basketball teams.  But not many can hit pro pitching.  There better be much better scouting reasons than fast/strong/can throw hard.  I assume there are, otherwise I don't think he'd get as much buzz. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 31, 2011, 06:32:36 pm
Springer sounds like a really bad bet.  Maybe he's flipped things, but reb mentioned that he started badly this season, and he actually was a top-ten coming in.  How could that possibly be?  I looked at his baseball cube stats, and he was a K-king with holes galore even in college.  He whiffed like 27% in the bbcube stats which I assume were fresh/soph years!  Can you imagine what will happen in the pros?  Yykstra Dykstra.  I admit I don't really get it.  reb said he was a top-ten guy entering the spring; how could that have been with a 27% K rate coming into the year? 

Yikes.  If that's the est of the position prospects, then I guess I'll change my mind, and happily take a pitcher and hope magically he stays healthy.  Some do. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 31, 2011, 06:41:36 pm
Daytona pitcher Dae-Eun Rhee hasn't allowed a hit through four innings against the Charlotte Stone Crabs.

Rafael Valdes is 0-1.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 31, 2011, 06:52:23 pm
None of which matters if he can't hit.  :) 

Jeff, that's a good point that a lot of the tall guys are K-machines and can't hit.  Maybe he's different, I have no idea, but the scouts better have awfully good indication that he is. 

Every year there are a bunch of guys who are tall and fast and strong and athletic who go and play linebacker and tight end and safety in hundreds of colleges, and who are big guards or small forwards on hundreds of college basketball teams.  But not many can hit pro pitching.

We are looking at a very small sample size precisely because so many of the relatively few athletes who are that big end up attracted to basketball or football.  Even if they are not attracted there at the pro level or in college, they will often be attracted there much earlier, ending up with divided attention that prevents them from amounting to much in any sport.

But you do not need to look that hard to find position players 6-5 or better who have hit well in the majors.  Dave Winfield was 6-6.  Frank Howard was 6-7.  Cal Ripkin was 6-4.  Lots of good hitters are 6-4.

I am not saying the Cubs should draft the guy, but merely that they should not pass on him simply because he is 6-5.

Most draft picks never amount to anything.  If we are looking at a relatively small handful of those who were 6-5 who failed, we might want to consider the fact that we are looking at a very small sample size.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2011, 06:53:00 pm
Simpson got 2 outs tonight. Walked 3, threw two wild pitches, surrendered a homer. 37 pitches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 31, 2011, 07:03:29 pm
Daytona pitcher Dae-Eun Rhee hasn't allowed a hit through four innings against the Charlotte Stone Crabs.

I wonder if Rhee is starting to find his stuff again.  This will be two dominant outings in a row for him if he keeps things going tonight.

That will certainly be a positive development for the system if Rhee returns to being a stud prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 31, 2011, 07:04:40 pm
Soto's opinion of McNutt per CBS:
Cubs SP prospect Trey McNutt was caught by catcher Geovany Soto while he was on a rehab assignment on Saturday and he said nothing but good things about the pitcher. “He was throwing the ball really good, hitting his spots really good,” Soto said to ESPN.com. “I have a feeling he’s pretty close, he’s gonna be [in the big leagues] soon.” McNutt is 1-2 this season in eight starts with a 2.34 ERA in the process.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 31, 2011, 07:06:02 pm
Of course, after catching Russell, Coleman, Davis, and Lopez, I suppose Soto would be impressed with McNutt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 31, 2011, 07:12:09 pm
Simpson got 2 outs tonight. Walked 3, threw two wild pitches, surrendered a homer. 37 pitches.

That's just great.  When can we start being worried about this guy?

Of course, after catching Russell, Coleman, Davis, and Lopez, I suppose Soto would be impressed with McNutt.

That's a good point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 31, 2011, 07:13:07 pm
I wonder if Rhee is starting to find his stuff again.  This will be two dominant outings in a row for him if he keeps things going tonight.

That will certainly be a positive development for the system if Rhee returns to being a stud prospect.
Sorry, JR

Player    IP    H    R    ER    BB    SO    HR    ERA
Rhee    4.2    4    4    4    1    3    0    3.49
Ebinger    0.1    2    1    1    0    0    0    6.03
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 31, 2011, 07:13:33 pm
Way to go, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2011, 07:28:13 pm
Don't blame JR. It's the Cubs. Failure is inevitable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 31, 2011, 07:29:59 pm
No, it's all JR's fault.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 31, 2011, 07:47:07 pm
One of these days, I'll learn to keep my mouth shut.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 31, 2011, 08:14:37 pm
Simpson got 2 outs tonight. Walked 3, threw two wild pitches, surrendered a homer. 37 pitches.

But did his arm hurt afterward?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on May 31, 2011, 08:52:19 pm
That's just great.  When can we start being worried about this guy?

When he was drafted?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2011, 08:59:29 pm
H-J Lee w/ a 3B and RBI against his old org:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_31_dbcafa_chaafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Szczur: 0-5, K

Suarez: 3-0-0-0-1-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_05_31_peoafx_lanafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2011, 09:19:17 pm
Struck:6-5-1-1-2-4

Jackson: 0-3, BB, 2 K

Lake: 0-4, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_31_tenaax_hunaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2011, 10:07:45 pm
When did we get Augie Ojeda back?

Coleman: 5-2/3 -3-2-2-5-6 ; 2-3, 2B, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_05_31_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 01, 2011, 04:45:52 am
Ojeda was back during this seasons spring training.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 01, 2011, 05:59:58 am
So when is it OK to add Josh Vitters name to the pantheon of players like Harvey and Dopirak?  Do I have to wait until next season?  2 more seasons?  One thing is for certain, he won't be on any top 10 prospect lists this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 01, 2011, 06:13:53 am
So when is it OK to add Josh Vitters name to the pantheon of players like Harvey and Dopirak?  Do I have to wait until next season?  2 more seasons?  One thing is for certain, he won't be on any top 10 prospect lists this season.

I'm convinced we need a move to first with him....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 01, 2011, 06:31:03 am
Something I just noticed:  Dolis is primarily relieving now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 01, 2011, 06:35:20 am
Is Jeffrey Beliveau just a left handed specialist?  Even so ... his numbers are ridiculous for a guy I don't hear anyone talk about.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=542924
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 01, 2011, 07:30:40 am
Is Jeffrey Beliveau just a left handed specialist?  Even so ... his numbers are ridiculous for a guy I don't hear anyone talk about.

And not just this year.  He's 24 all season,  and in AA, so he is not exactly young, but he has put up good numbers at every level, and great numbers the last two years.  167 career hits allowed in 225 innings, with 302 K's, 113 walks, only 12 HR, an ERA of 2.80 and a WHIP of 1.244.

Has anyone actually seen him pitch or seen a scouting report on the guy?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 01, 2011, 08:56:51 am
 Veteran INF Augie Ojeda joins the I-Cubs today for the first time since the 2006 season.  Ojeda re-signed with the Cubs on January 26, 2011 marking his third stint with the organization.  He began the season in Mesa where he was battling back spasms.  In three seasons with Iowa, Ojeda has hit .256 in 301 games with 138 runs scored and 91 RBI.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 01, 2011, 10:05:33 am
Nice AA debut for Struck. 

Kind of funny that with Whitenack injured, and presumably Simpson and Cashner having arm problems, it seems perhaps our next best rotation prospects are all rounds 30-and-up (McNutt, Struck, and Beeler.) 


Seems like most of the earlier-round pitchers get arm injuries.  (Cashner, I expect that Simpson who had a tight shoulder earlier may have more than simply mono-recovery at play, Whitenack, Shafer, Bristow, Jay Jackson...) 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 01, 2011, 11:02:01 am
Daytona is 39-13, in first place by 6 games, with the best record in the league. 

Daytona not only has the best record in the FSL, but they have the best record in the entire minor leagues.

Here's an article on Justin Bour that mentions that.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110531&content_id=19815964&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2011, 11:49:05 am
I took Vitters off my top prospects list a couple of seasons ago.

When he is no longer with the organization, that is the time to rank him with others who failed and left.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 01, 2011, 02:13:53 pm
Josh Harrison, the little high-average contact hitting 2b that we gave in the Grudz deal to Pittsburgh, has gotten called up.  He got a couple of hits in his Pirates debut.  He was hitting .321 in AAA, after hitting .300 in AA last year.  He hasn't hit below .300 in any summer thus far.  Nice pick in the 6th round. 

Russ Cansler is hitting .313 with a .962 OPS and .434 OBP in the not-so-hitting-friendly International League.  He had a .938 OPS last year at Tennessee too, so I think it's no fluke.  I suspect the notion that he's a DH defensively isn't a fluke either, but that's a different story. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 01, 2011, 06:17:54 pm
Another Bour piece:

All except two of Bour's 13 homers -- one behind league-leader Brad Glenn of Dunedin -- have come at Daytona's Jackie Robinson Ballpark, where the wind has blown out a little more than normal so far this season.

The Cubs have clubbed 46 homers -- by far the most for any team -- over their first 51 games.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110531&content_id=19815964&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 01, 2011, 06:37:16 pm
The Cubs have placd RH Justin Berg on the disabled list, as of May 29, with a right elbow strain.  Berg has had two stints with Chicago this season and has no record and a 3.75 ERA in 12 innings with the Cubs.  In seven games with Iowa, he is 2-0 with a 2.25 ERA and one save in eight innings of work.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 01, 2011, 10:05:22 pm
Bour: 2-4, HR, RBI, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_01_dbcafa_chaafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Kirk: 5-1-1-1-4-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_01_peoafx_lanafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Vitters: 2-3, RBI ; left game in the 5th

Jackson: 0-5, K, 2 for last 21

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_01_tenaax_hunaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 01, 2011, 10:12:06 pm
There's a road home run for Bour.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 01, 2011, 10:16:43 pm
Jackson: 7 IP, R

Mateo: 0-3-4-4-2-0, 2 HR


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_01_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 01, 2011, 10:17:53 pm
I don't understand how Mateo can be so awful with the stuff he has. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 01, 2011, 10:22:52 pm
That makes two of us, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2011, 10:30:03 pm
Has anyone noticed that the more players that Iowa sends up to the Cubs, the more games that Iowa wins.

We should ship everyone back, and bring up the ones still there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 02, 2011, 12:41:31 pm
AZPhil says ex-3B now RHP convert Charles Thomas is throwing 98 mph in extended spring training. 

Of course, having a 98 mph fastball hasn't helped Marcos Mateo that much, but that's still pretty interesting information.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 02, 2011, 12:50:36 pm
Keith Law chat:

Quote
Gene (Iowa)
How does one pronounce "Szczur"?

Klaw  (1:29 PM)
"Pierre."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 02, 2011, 12:52:41 pm
Ha!  Well Law has definitely been the most bearish on Szczur's power prospects for sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 02, 2011, 01:09:45 pm
Well, Keith Law is never wrong.

He thought Esmailin Caridad was going to be a very successful Major League setup reliever and that prediction was spot-on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 02, 2011, 01:11:39 pm
Here is something I didn't know. 

ArizonaPhil talking about Ceasar.

"As you know, because the Cubs signed him to a new contract this past March that involved releasing him from his previous contract, he is eligible for selection in next December's Rule 5 Draft. So he is a lock to get added to the Cubs 40-man roster post-2011."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on June 02, 2011, 02:01:58 pm
I would be very pleased if Sczur has the career of Juan Pierre.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 02, 2011, 02:07:16 pm
Well eventually the Cub farm system needs to produce stars, and when you sign a guy for $1.5 million, you really need some of those guys to start becoming stars instead of an anti-awful guy like Pierre.

On the face of it, yeah any pick that turns out to be a useful major leaguer is a successful pick.  Eventually, though, we need someone from the group of players we think have high ceilings, like Brett Jackson or Matt Szczur, to fulfill their high ceilings and be all-star caliber players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 02, 2011, 04:25:42 pm
Of course, having a 98 mph fastball hasn't helped Marcos Mateo that much, but that's still pretty interesting information.

A 98 mph fastball will not assure success.

But it is a decent place to start.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 02, 2011, 06:40:33 pm
The Chicago Cubs designated right handed pitchers Jeff Stevens and Robert Coello for assignment last week. Today, both have cleared through waivers and remain in the Cubs' organization. Stevens will rejoin the Iowa Cubs active roster. Coello has been reassigned to Double-A Tennessee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 02, 2011, 06:47:30 pm
Five Daytona Cubs make FSL All-Star team

Justin Bour leads the FSL in almost every offensive category.

Junior Lake  leads the FSL in stolen bases (19), and has four more than any other player. Lake has used the "delayed steal" to his advantage this season, as 15 of his 19 have been delayed.

Evan Crawford leads the FSL in hitting.

Frank Batista was tested as the Cubs closer by Manager Buddy Bailey, and has cemented himself in that role with his success. Batista saved each of his first 13 chances successfully, and the only blown save he has on the season, came in the eighth innings when he allowed an inherited runner to score.

Aaron Kurcz is the youngest of the Cubs' All-Stars. At 20 years old, Kurcz has pitched tremendously in his first season as starter in professional baseball for the Cubs.

The rest of the article if that wasn't enough

http://daytona.cubs.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110602&content_id=19938114&vkey=news_t450&fext=.jsp&sid=t450
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: sam hannam on June 02, 2011, 08:06:07 pm
Szczur with another HR tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 02, 2011, 08:07:18 pm
From NSBB:

McNutt taken out after 2 innings (47 pitches). No word on why.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 02, 2011, 08:16:19 pm
For the love of Goc.

That's two in what, a week?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2011, 08:44:45 pm
Antigua promoted to Daytona, perhaps taking Struck's spot: 3-1-0-0-0-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_02_dbcafa_chaafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 02, 2011, 08:59:41 pm
Did anybody hear what Vitters injury is?  He got pulled mid-game yesterday, not playing today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 02, 2011, 09:00:24 pm
Are we sure he didn't just wander off and get into some creepy dude's van?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 02, 2011, 09:09:56 pm
I'm not a huge minor league follower, so maybe I don't know what I'm talking about...but how much longer can they leave Bour at Daytona?  He seems to be too good for the level.  Let's see what he can do at AA.  If the big decision this offseason is whether or not to sign Pujols/Fielder, it makes sense to challenge the guy who might be the best first base prospect in the organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2011, 09:10:31 pm
Szczur: 4-6, HR, RBI, SB

6 Chiefs with at least 3 hits.

Beeler: 5-1/3 -5-2-1-1-6


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_02_peoafx_lanafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 02, 2011, 09:14:36 pm
I'm not a huge minor league follower, so maybe I don't know what I'm talking about...but how much longer can they leave Bour at Daytona?  He seems to be too good for the level.  Let's see what he can do at AA.  If the big decision this offseason is whether or not to sign Pujols/Fielder, it makes sense to challenge the guy who might be the best first base prospect in the organization.

I agree with this.  He just turned 23, so it's time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 02, 2011, 09:31:46 pm
Szczur: 4-6, HR, RBI, SB


He's not looking bad for "no power."  OPS of .826, slugging .435, 13 SB in 14 attempts, and 31 runs in 35 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2011, 09:48:34 pm
Jackson: 1-4, BB, CS

Beliveau: 2-1-0-0-0-3 , 21-27 strikes (78%)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_02_tenaax_hunaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on June 02, 2011, 10:11:53 pm
Well eventually the Cub farm system needs to produce stars, and when you sign a guy for $1.5 million, you really need some of those guys to start becoming stars instead of an anti-awful guy like Pierre.

On the face of it, yeah any pick that turns out to be a useful major leaguer is a successful pick.  Eventually, though, we need someone from the group of players we think have high ceilings, like Brett Jackson or Matt Szczur, to fulfill their high ceilings and be all-star caliber players.

Good points.  I just think Pierre has been a significant cut above anti-awful for much of his career.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2011, 10:36:53 pm
The Iowa pitching staff is far worse than the parent club's. Think about that.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_02_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 03, 2011, 04:44:01 am
The Iowa pitching staff is far worse than the parent club's. Think about that.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_02_iowaaa_nasaaa_1

The Cubs pitching staff pretty much is the Iowa Cubs pitching staff.  Right now, the current Iowa (Iowa) Cubs are worse than the current Iowa (Chicago) Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Tom Hudson on June 03, 2011, 05:16:15 am
Szczur: 4-6, HR, RBI, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_02_peoafx_lanafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Seems like I remember someone(s) concluding shortly after his (second) signing that Szczur was never going to amount to anything.  He still might not, but he's off to a pretty damn good start I'd say.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on June 03, 2011, 06:28:16 am
Did anybody hear what Vitters injury is?  He got pulled mid-game yesterday, not playing today.

I would guess it is once again the "Pink Taco" disease.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 03, 2011, 07:06:01 am
On NSBB, there's a rumor that Robert Whitenack has posted on his Facebook page that he will be undergoing Tommy John surgery.

That sucks, if true.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 03, 2011, 07:58:58 am
Yeah that does suck.  He was definitely having a breakout year. 

You just never know with pitchers. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 03, 2011, 08:20:06 am
Quote from: JR on June 02, 2011, 02:07:16 pm
Quote
Well eventually the Cub farm system needs to produce stars, and when you sign a guy for $1.5 million, you really need some of those guys to start becoming stars instead of an anti-awful guy like Pierre.

On the face of it, yeah any pick that turns out to be a useful major leaguer is a successful pick.  Eventually, though, we need someone from the group of players we think have high ceilings, like Brett Jackson or Matt Szczur, to fulfill their high ceilings and be all-star caliber players
.

Good points.  I just think Pierre has been a significant cut above anti-awful for much of his career.


Agree that we need some A players.  I think with a superslot of course you overpay to get.  So $1.5 might be nearer to a $1 or a $0.8 guy in slot. 


I think "comps" are always of questionable merit.  No two guys are ever exactly the same, and sometimes minor differences can result in big differences. 


At his best, Pierre was a good player.  (The .370+ OBP guy was.) 


Szczur has hit 3 HR in his last 25 AB.  Pierre hit a total of 1 in 1500 minor league AB's, and has hit 14 in 6400 big-league AB's.  His career high has been 3, in a career with six seasons with over 650 AB. 


That potential HR difference is nontrivial.  If Pierre had been hitting 10 HR's a year during his good years,  an extra 10 HR could 15 points in BA, 15 points in OBP, 60 points in slugging, and 75 to OPS.  10 HR would make a significant shift from the PIerre end towards the Lofton direction.


And then there is a question of defense.  We know that Szczur has not been reported to have a strong arm, but my understanding is that while it isn't Glanville, neither is it the Juan Pierre rubber band.  Sickels had a note that Szczur is good defensively.  (I'm not sure if that's true, and if it is it's significant, because to date it's seemed like the only real account on his defense is that he's fast and athletic, but that doesn't always add up to good defense.  Pierre was fast but wasn't that great really in center.  If Szczur was somewhat better defensively, that would also slide him a step in the lofton direction.   


And then there is the walk/IsoD thing. 


No two guys are the same.  He won't be lofton.  He won't be Pierre.  But if those are the boundaries, I'm just hoping that his power, defense, and IsoD all move him to some degree or other to the good side of Pierre and towards the lofton direction. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 03, 2011, 09:09:09 am
There are two other factors about Szczur which need to be remembered, and the two are likely closely related:

1) He is 16-1 in steals so far in the minors, in 61 games, and 14-1 this year in 36 games, so he is not only impressively good overall in SB, he appears to be getting better.

2) He has scored 58 runs so far in the minors in those 61 games, this season at 34 runs for 36 games.  That is close to a run a game.

Those are very impressive figures.  In fact they are so impressive that they almost certainly are the result of small sample size, but the fact that he appears to becoming increasingly aggressive in stealing would seem less likely to be.

Also nice to see his W/K rate -- 25/29 overall, and 15/13 this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 03, 2011, 10:20:13 am
Is there any team in baseball that has a better staff with their AAA team than that of the majors?  There may well be several with a AAA staff with better potential, but that is a different thing.

Besides, they are forgetting about Ramon Ortiz.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 03, 2011, 11:22:06 am
http://www.northsidebaseball.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59340


Quote
Bruce Miles   
 Post subject: Re: Whitenack. TJSPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:06 am

Whitenack will have Tommy John surgery next Tuesday. They brought him to Chicago for an MRI and got the news last night. McNutt was involved in a collision last night. Not sure of the nature of the injury but he tried to pitch through it before coming out of the game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 03, 2011, 11:27:40 am
McNutt was involved in a collision last night. Not sure of the nature of the injury but he tried to pitch through it before coming out of the game.

Good goc, how stupid can this organization be?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 03, 2011, 11:48:46 am
McNutt was involved in a collision last night. Not sure of the nature of the injury but he tried to pitch through it before coming out of the game.

Good goc, how stupid can this organization be?
That's a tough one, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2011, 12:05:50 pm
Yet another pitching prospect down. Might be time to give it up at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on June 03, 2011, 02:02:21 pm
does beliveau need to get bumped up now to AAA with a looksee in Sept with the big club?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 03, 2011, 02:09:01 pm
Sucks to hear about Whitenack but that is why you need multiple top tier guys.  You know you are going to lose a significant portion to injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 03, 2011, 02:31:02 pm
I just wonder how the hell Dusty Baker got to him!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 03, 2011, 02:49:17 pm
2B David Macias goes from Daytona down to Peoria.  Must be related to another roster move as his stats are good.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=2B&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=543478
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 03, 2011, 03:17:43 pm
Trey McNutt has bruised ribs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 03, 2011, 03:24:29 pm
2B David Macias goes from Daytona down to Peoria.  Must be related to another roster move as his stats are good.

Macias is strictly an organizational guy.  Basically he'll get moved around any time one of the other minor league teams needs to fill a utility spot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 03, 2011, 03:39:35 pm
I had braised ribs for dinner the other night - delicious.  McNutt's a lucky guy - great BBQ in Tennessee. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on June 03, 2011, 03:43:14 pm
On a more serious note, it's good to hear McNutt's injury is to his ribs and not his arm.  Hopefully they will keep him out until he heals completely.

Totally bummed about Whitenack.  He sounded like he was on track for a September callup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 03, 2011, 03:44:16 pm
I had braised ribs for dinner the other night - delicious.  McNutt's a lucky guy - great BBQ in Tennessee.
McNutts are tasty as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 03, 2011, 03:52:40 pm
Please take that to Under the Bleachers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 03, 2011, 05:40:31 pm
Peoria Chief All-Stars

Pierre LePage
Greg Rohan
Matt Szczur
Micah Gibbs
Richard Jones
Austin Kirk!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 03, 2011, 05:43:07 pm
Over the past five games, Iowa's bullpen has given up 22 runs (20 earned) and walked 12 in 15.0 innings pitched.  Relievers are 0-2 with a 12.00 ERA in those games.  The 'pen has also blown one save and converted two.  Twice, relievers have entered the game and given up runs without recording an out (Marcos Mateo, 3H, 4ER and Blake Parker, 3H, 3ER).  On the season, Iowa relievers have issued 115 walks in 187.2 innings pitched, compared to 113 free passes given by Cubs starting pitchers in 272.1 innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 03, 2011, 08:02:59 pm
Alberto Cabrera is another in a long line of Cub prospects who throws hard but has no idea where he's throwing it and when he does throw a strike, it goes a long way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 03, 2011, 08:06:51 pm
I just don't get how the Cubs can have so many of those guys and never seem to find a way to get them to throw the ball over the plate with any sort of regularity.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 03, 2011, 08:21:24 pm
Poor scouting and poor coaching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2011, 08:38:26 pm
Bour: 0-3, 2 K

Hak-Ju Lee: 2-4, SB, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_03_dbcafa_chaafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Hicks: 5-6-1-1-1-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_03_peoafx_swmafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 03, 2011, 09:00:32 pm
LOL!  Iowa just hit into a triple play.  First time I've seen that at a pro game.

Great night for both Cub teams.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 03, 2011, 09:03:03 pm
The Sounds announcer just said that was the first triple play he's witnessed in 30 years of broadcasting.  Only the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 03, 2011, 09:10:40 pm
Does anybody know how serious Rosscup's injury is?  He hasn't pitched since the 15th, so it's been about 3 weeks.  I guess I should have know he was injured back when he pitched that day, since he gave up a HR, the only one of his pro career.  That probably doesn't happen if he's healthy. 

Ebenger has really been awful. 

Cub pitching is pretty thin down their in Daytona.  Tonight was Wallach's turn but Ebenger instead.  So I assume that Wallach as well as Rosscup are injured.  Whitenack promoted and injured, and Kurcz moved up, four of Daytona's original starters are now gone. 

Vitters played today, so that's good news. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 03, 2011, 09:30:35 pm
Dallas Beeler was promoted from Peoria to TN....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2011, 09:34:04 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_03_iowaaa_nasaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2011, 09:41:58 pm
Jackson: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_03_tenaax_hunaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2011, 09:42:29 pm
Quote
Vitters played today, so that's good news.

I can never tell when Craig's serious anymore.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 03, 2011, 09:44:42 pm
Chris, you're the tracker on everything. 

Do you know whatever happened to Rosscup, and if he's a surgery guy or what? 

Wells, thanks for note on Beeler.  That's pretty astonishing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 03, 2011, 10:02:51 pm
An ERA of 2.08 and a WHIP of .981 for Beeler in 34.2 innings.

If he keeps things up in Tenn, that would be pretty impressive.   He turns 23 next week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 03, 2011, 10:05:46 pm
McNutt was involved in a collision last night. Not sure of the nature of the injury but he tried to pitch through it before coming out of the game.

Good goc, how stupid can this organization be?

Things have changed a great deal in the game over the years.

In 1967 Bob Gibson took a Clemente line drive off his leg and it BROKE his leg.  Gibson got up off the ground and pitched to the next batter.  It was part of the stuff of Gibson's legend.

Today fans would attack the organization for allowing him to try it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2011, 10:12:06 pm
Quote
Do you know whatever happened to Rosscup, and if he's a surgery guy or what? 

Can't find a thing on his current situation and I don't know if he's had surgery. He missed the first couple of months last year presumably with an injury, but I can't find anything specific on that either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 04, 2011, 12:11:19 am
Dallas Beeler was promoted from Peoria to TN....

Dang, that is quite a promotion for a guy that has only pitched about 50 innings in pro ball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 04, 2011, 01:50:15 am
Was today the first time all four farm teams lost?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 04, 2011, 12:42:51 pm
Nice thing that Trey McNutt and the Smokies are involved in.....

http://cgi.ebay.com/Chicago-Cubs-AA-Tennessee-Smokies-Fan-Experience-/160594624140?pt=US_Baseball_Fan_Shop&hash=item25642f7e8c&clk_rvr_id=237604967930&afsrc=1#ht_526wt_1139
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 04, 2011, 01:19:44 pm
That's cool.  What's the date.  I couldn't find it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 04, 2011, 01:34:54 pm
'Winning bidder can select any Tennessee Smokies home game in June.'
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 04, 2011, 01:48:39 pm
Wanna go, P2?  I'll pick you up in Louisville.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 04, 2011, 02:06:41 pm
Nice thought, Curt, but if I want to see minor league baseball I'll make the trip to Chicago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 04, 2011, 02:12:51 pm
LOL

Okay, Dave23...you interested?
JR?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2011, 02:14:53 pm
JR won't go unless you throw in a sack of White Castle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 04, 2011, 02:25:23 pm
Well, I can't invite DaveP cuz it's already over 3 bucks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 04, 2011, 02:46:54 pm
Craig, Rosscup is scheduled to pitch for Daytona tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 04, 2011, 04:15:21 pm
The corresponding move with Beeler being promoted is MnNutt to the DL....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2011, 08:20:36 pm
Flaherty: 3-4, HR, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_04_jacaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 04, 2011, 08:27:20 pm
Josh Vitters with another error, his 14th.

This one came at third on a throw, according to the box score.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 04, 2011, 08:29:08 pm
Theres a shock.....I didn't go tonight but will go tomorrow night and watch.

They had a 5 game lead at one point and it is now down to 1 game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2011, 08:49:30 pm
Rosscup: 3-3-2-2-0-3, 2 HR

Ha: 0-3, BB, K , (4-20 since returning to Daytona)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_04_breafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 04, 2011, 08:52:30 pm
MLB's worst farm system.  MLB's worst major league team.

Why does Jim Hendry still have a job?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 04, 2011, 08:54:05 pm
His classic good looks?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2011, 09:22:08 pm
Peoria:


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_04_peoafx_swmafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 05, 2011, 02:24:45 am
LeHair is having one of those Micah Hoffpauir type season.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_04_omaaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on June 05, 2011, 09:25:43 am
Was at Daytona...Rosscup was pitching batting practice in the first 2 innings. Gave up 2 homeruns and 2 others that barely went foul. I think he's ready to be called up. Silva started in left...not much with the bat and mixed reviews for his defense. He made a nice diving catch in the 1st...dropped a foul pop in the 6th. Lots of jawing about balls and strikes from both teams. Home plate ump was very inconsistant.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 05, 2011, 10:52:03 am
Sounds like the home plate ump is ready to get called up, too!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 05, 2011, 12:08:43 pm
Headed out to the Smokies game this evening to watch Struck pitch....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 05, 2011, 02:10:04 pm
Wells - let us know what you think of Nelson Perez.  When I saw him at Peoria, he was swinging at everything within 5 feet of the plate.  But he had a good combination of power, arm and speed.

He is still striking out about one third of the time, but he has raised his BA drastically.  Has he gained any ball and strike judgement?

I still think he should be a pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 05, 2011, 02:48:18 pm
Casey Coleman's no-hit bid ends with no outs in 6th. Had retired 15 straight. I-Cubs lead Omaha 8-0
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 05, 2011, 03:59:43 pm
Simpson: 4-2/3 -3-3-2-1-4 , HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_05_peoafx_swmafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Coleman: 6-1-2-1-2-7

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_05_omaaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 05, 2011, 04:12:05 pm
1B Greg Rohan has a 17 game hit streak for Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 05, 2011, 06:28:40 pm
Clevenger has slumped down to almost .300 for Tennessee.  Iowa seemed easier for him!  Ha has dived below .300 at Daytona. 

Jackson, who seems to be the universal consensus #1 prospect, is now down in the .250's for Tennessee. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 05, 2011, 07:39:02 pm
Jackson: 1-4, RBI, BB

Struck: 6-7-3-3-1-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_05_jacaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Rhee: 6-3-3-3-1-5, 2 HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_05_dbcafa_breafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Santo4HofF on June 05, 2011, 07:39:56 pm
Maybe some of our top prospects are tanking their season or getting hurt so that they won't get called up to the big club and have to be associated with the most pathetic team in baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 05, 2011, 07:59:19 pm
Maybe some of our top prospects are tanking their season or getting hurt so that they won't get called up to the big club and have to be associated with the most pathetic team in baseball.

Don't be absurd.  Cub prospects aren't that smart.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 05, 2011, 08:34:47 pm
I haven't gotten to see Nelson play a whole lot during the home games but he has impressed me what little bit I have seen.....He is great defensively with a strong arm. Struck pitched well tonight after getting out of a major jam with bases loaded in the first inning after that settling down and throwing the ball well...Jeff Beliveau was very impressive again tonight topping out at 90 but it just explodes out of his hand is on the hitters before they know it. Dolis also pitched well tonight topping out at 94 then coming right back with an 80 mph change that had the batter falling down. Jackson has not been impressive since returning from his injury but did get the walk off game winning hit tonight to plate Clevenger who led off the 9th with a gapper double. Chris Carpenter once again gave up a two run lead on a massive shot that went completely out of the park around a 400ft shot to career minor league Joe Dunigan. A nice win for the Smokies tho.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2011, 09:24:43 pm
Jackson: 0-4, RBI, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_06_jacaax_tenaax_1


Bour: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB, 2 K, E

Ha: 2-5, HR, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_06_breafa_dbcafa_1


Peoria off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 06, 2011, 09:30:32 pm
Jackson is down to .257.

Awesome season for everyone in this organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 06, 2011, 09:36:16 pm
So the Cubs get no luck in the draft this year (ie none of the top guys slide to them), their top pitching prospects get hurt, their top offensive prospect is batting below .260, they trade their best infield prospect for a pitcher who had a stint on the DL and has been statistically good, but hasn't provided anything dominate (ERA above 4, WHIP at 1.42).  Their sort of trade-able guys -- Soto, Byrd -- have been injured.  The payroll is one of the highest and your record is one of the lowest.  And the only real plus to the year is a second baseman who will be lucky to become Mark Grudzelanek. 

And of course, its JUST June 6th. 

Here's all you need to know about this year:  Doug Davis is starting again tomorrow.

@#$3.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2011, 09:46:22 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_06_omaaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 06, 2011, 10:41:29 pm
Jay Jackson, not long ago viewed as one of the top prospects in the org, has 17 K in 40.1 innings. 

Something isn't right with him. 

Junior Lake has more errors than hits since his promotion. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 07, 2011, 02:24:58 pm
Angel Guzman has moved from extended spring training to Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 07, 2011, 02:36:52 pm
Help is on the way!

He could last up to two innings!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 07, 2011, 02:45:59 pm
Banjo-hitting Ceasar now has 3 HR for the season, all in his last 7 games.  He continues his run scoring at a remarkable rate -- 36 runs in 38 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 07, 2011, 07:23:28 pm
Sometimes Dominican Summer League box scores are fun to look at.  They've mostly been getting rained out, and as usual the DSL1 team (the better team) got rained out again.

But DSL2 team did play and won, 8-5. 
*6'3" LH-hitting RFer Delbis Arcila, who turned 18 a few weeks ago and was interesting as a 17-year-old rookie last year,  played for the first time this season and took a couple of walks to go with a double and triple.  OPS 2.500 or something like that. 
*3B Candelario, who bats 3rd and plays every day, and was signed for $500K, took 4 walks to go with a single.  In 6 games, he has 10 walks and 2 K's, not the usual DSL profile.  6'1" switch hitter with a strong arm, 17. 
*1B Jeff Peunte had 5 K's in 5 AB.  Second year in DSL, not looking good. 
*Switch-hitting 2B John Ortega made his pro debut, going 3-4.  He just turned 17 a couple of weeks ago.  Young. 
*SS Carlos Penalvar, who turned 17 a couple weeks ago and signed for $550, got his first pro K.  But he's hitting .316 thus far with 6BB/1K. 
*Big 6'3" Pedro Araujo K'd 6 in 4 innings in his second pro appearance.  He'll turn 18 in July. 

Kind of fun to see some of the dollar guys or the younger guys doing well. 

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_07_dmerok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 07, 2011, 07:25:37 pm
dallas Beeler making his AA debut tonight.  Has scattered 4 singles over the first four shutout innings.  Only 50 pitches, he's a strike-thrower.  Will be interesting to find whether he's basically a low-90's fastballer, or if he's got some breaking ball in progress that might be interesting. 

Flaherty 2-2 with a triple in the early going. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 07, 2011, 08:07:52 pm
And more importantly.....Josh Vitters with an RBI single  ;D
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 07, 2011, 08:23:22 pm
Beeler is now to 6 shutout innings....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 07, 2011, 09:00:18 pm
Beeler: 6-7-0-0-0-4

Jackson: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, K, HBP

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_07_jacaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 07, 2011, 09:11:37 pm
Twelve members of the 2011 Tennessee Smokies roster were named Tuesday by the Southern League of Professional Baseball Clubs to the 2011 Southern League All-Star Game. Position players Steve Clevenger, Ryan Flaherty, Marwin Gonzalez, Brett Jackson, Blake Lalli, DJ LeMahieu, Rebel Ridling and Matt Spencer will join teammates Marco Carrillo, Rafael Dolis, Trey McNutt and Rob Whitenack on the North Division roster at Pringles Park in Jackson, Tenn. for the June 21 game.


Carrillo and LeMahieu, who have both been promoted to Triple-A Iowa and MLB Chicago Cubs, respectively, were named to the All-Star team, but will not participate, due to the fact they were promoted after the ballots went out

The 12 members of the 2011 class makes Smokies history for most All-Star selections, surpassing the 2010 class of eight.

Players selected for the Southern League All-Star teams are selected by a vote of Southern League field managers, radio broadcasters, general managers and print media. The South Division roster will be announced tomorrow, June 8th. Starting lineups for the North and South Divisions will be released on June 9th and 10th respectively.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 07, 2011, 09:50:52 pm
Kirk: 7-4-1-1-1-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_07_wmiafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 07, 2011, 11:27:21 pm
5 hits, 7 walks and 5 runs off the Iowa pen:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_07_omaaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 07, 2011, 11:35:15 pm
Kirk is having a pretty nice season, and is having a wonderfully low BABIP against, I think. 

Three cautions:
1.  I think HR's could be a concern.  4 HR's in 64 Midwest innings is kind of high red/flag. 
2.  Linked with that, kind of fly-ball oriented.  0.6 GO/AO ratio is pretty low. 

My caution on both of those is that in A-, a lefty can throw fastballs for strikes, guys can drive them, but not often are they driven out.  That enables them to justify a lot of fastball strikes, which establishes a lot of pitcher friendly counts.  But sometimes that Micah Bowies in the majors. (They kill my fastball; I'll nibble; I'm always behind; that curve that I was K'ing minor leaguers with they just take and I get further down in the count.)

3.  He has not seemed well suited to lefty relief.  It seems he often starts bad in the first inning or two, then settles in and grooves for a while.  That's fine if you're a starter, but if you make the league as a lefty reliever, as is the role for most LHP in the majors and might eventually be for Kirk, that doesn't work out so well. 
4.  When a guy takes a while to get loosened up and grooved in, I sometimes wonder if he's got some latent arm issues that will later emerge as problematic. 

I'm thrilled he seems to so consistently end up with excellent results, pretty consistent and the stuff of a 1.96 ERA at this point is really good.  I'm just not sure he's really quite a 1.96-ERA super prospect.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 08, 2011, 09:28:53 am
Kirk should be the next prospect to go down with injury I presume.  It seems the system is doomed in that regard this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 08, 2011, 12:35:28 pm
Other than Whitenack, has anyone else significant gone down with a season ending injury in the minors?  McNutt has had blisters, and Jackson a broken finger, but I haven't kept track of others.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 08, 2011, 04:36:10 pm
Well, it's probable Jay Jackson has something wrong, and while you did say "minors" I would think Cashner being out this long, and his issue being a shoulder, would amount to a huge problem.

Cashner, Whitenack, and McNutt are the best pitching prospects:  none of them has had a healthy year (the blisters are an issue, but don't forget McNutt has/had a rib injury, after a collision).  That's just icing on this @#$3 cake that is the 2011 Cubs season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 08, 2011, 04:38:58 pm
Is there anyone in the minors that's all that exciting right now?  You could argue Szczur, I guess.  Hopefully he won't amount to Bobby Hill.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 08, 2011, 05:02:51 pm
Ha!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 08, 2011, 06:47:27 pm
Is there anyone in the minors that's all that exciting right now?  You could argue Szczur, I guess.  Hopefully he won't amount to Bobby Hill.

It would be nice if they would promote Justin Bour to AA so we could start figuring out if this guy is just the new version of Hoffpauir/LaHair or possibly something real.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 08, 2011, 07:20:02 pm
LeMehieu has had an exciting year.  Ha has done very well.  Ceasar has far exceeded my expectations.  Kirk is having an excellent year.  Even Nelson Perez has done far beyond what I had hoped for.  And Lake is having a very good year, as well as Gibbs, who is a defense first catcher who is hitting over three hundred with a very high OBA.  Even Rhee seems to be coming back rather strongly the last few games.

The only one with bleak outlooks are Cashner and Whitnack, and Whitnack wasn't on very many radar scopes before the year began.

The three teams that contain our prospects (Peoria, Daytona, and Tennessee) are dominating their leagues.  I consider the entire minor league system to be very exciting this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2011, 07:26:45 pm
I consider the entire minor league system to be very exciting this year.

Wow, you're easy to impress.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 08, 2011, 07:52:12 pm
From Muscat  http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110608&content_id=20204384&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc

[i}CINCINNATI -- Brett Jackson, the Cubs' No. 1 pick in the 2009 First-Year Player Draft, appears to be on the fast track to the big leagues.

Jackson is one of the top prospects in the Cubs' system. He is batting .259 in 41 games at Double-A Tennessee this season, although he had to miss time because of a finger injury. He was on the disabled list from May 12-29, and in nine games since returning from the DL, he's 5-for-35.[/i]

Since when did that kind of performance get a person on the "fast track" to the majors?

The headline for the article said "Vitters also eying callup."  This despite batting .274 in 53 games with five homers, 12 doubles and 28 RBIs.

Talk about drinking the Koolaid....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2011, 08:38:08 pm
Daytona gets 1-hit:


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_08_lakafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2011, 10:23:04 pm
Szczur: 4-5, 4 RBI, CS


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_08_wmiafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Smokies:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_08_jacaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 09, 2011, 07:52:42 am
Has anyone here seen Szczur play this year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 09, 2011, 02:30:01 pm
Tidbit from Dallas Beeler's recent AA start:


Throwing what he estimated to be between 90 and 95 percent two-seam fastballs, the 21-year-old right-hander struck out four without walking a batter.

...

He said he has taken to same approach to Tennessee that he used to be successful in Peoria.

"Just keep the ball down and throw a lot of strikes," Beeler said. "The pitching coach in Peoria, Jeff Fassero, said if you get in trouble, miss down. Just be really aggressive in the strike zone. That's what I come into games thinking."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 09, 2011, 02:49:48 pm
Beeler thinks about what he's going to do before he pitches? I wonder what washed-up, overpriced and undermotivated veteran we'll trade him for.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 09, 2011, 02:59:52 pm
Beeler thinks about what he's going to do before he pitches? I wonder what washed-up, overpriced and undermotivated veteran we'll trade him for.
I'm sure our instructional staff will be able to break him of that habit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 09, 2011, 07:01:18 pm
Iowa lineup vs Round Rock

PlayerPosABRH2B3BHRRBIBBSOAVG
            Johnson, Re (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=CF&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=407862)     CF000000000.000
            Baker, Je (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=2B&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=425557)     2B000000000.000
            LaHair (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=LF&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=445933)     LF000000000.363
            Castillo (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=DH&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=456078)     DH000000000.275
            Moore, S (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=1B&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=445599)     1B000000000.268
            Smith, M (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=3B&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=456673)     3B000000000.275
            Ojeda (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=SS&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=324432)     SS000000000.385
            Robinson, Ch (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=C&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=460101)     C000000000.259
            Perez, F (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=RF&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=445010)     RF000000000.211
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 09, 2011, 07:04:27 pm
That lineup might be better than the one we have in Philadelphia tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 09, 2011, 07:12:39 pm
F Perez -- I totally agree.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 09, 2011, 09:21:09 pm
Flaherty: 3-4, 2 2B, RBI, BB

Vitters: 2-4, 2B, HR, SF, 2 RBI, E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_09_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 09, 2011, 09:42:14 pm
Rosscup: 3-2/3 -2-0-0-1-6


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_09_lakafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Iowa suspended in the 4th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 09, 2011, 09:54:21 pm
Greathouse: 5-1-3-2-6-3 , 3 HB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_09_wmiafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 09, 2011, 10:01:34 pm
An extremely small sample size, but Casey Harmon, with 20 strike outs and only one walk is starting to get my attention.  He certainly is not young for the league, and I would like to see him sent up to Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 09, 2011, 11:49:05 pm
I wouldn't be surprised with anything they do with Harmon.  This is his first year in pros, and full season.  I think they've sometimes tended to keep first-year guys at the same level for most of the summer.  It's also his first time pitching relief.  So he's got a lot of new stuff to deal with.  He's certainly pitched well, though.  He's looking like he might be another of the lefty reliever prospects.  If they move him up, that would be interesting.  If they don't, it's fine to stick at Peoria till August.  Next year when he's 23, he could start at Daytona and if he continues to be effective in relief he could still be in AA at age 23, that's still pretty reasonable rate. 

The key, of course, is to remain effective.  A lot of these lefties find A-ball so much easier than AA. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 10, 2011, 06:26:35 am
Vitters is now on an 8 game hitting streak and is hitting around 500 in that stretch......He's raised his average to .278 from the low .200s and is looking good at the plate. He did commit his 15th error tho another throwing error.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 10, 2011, 09:30:01 am
Nice to see Vitters heat up for a bit.  Often as hitters get better, they are able to learn hot to extend their hot streaks and to make their lows shallower and shorter.  But he's always been a kind of hot and cold guy.  Who isn't, I guess. 

His OPS is up to .756.  Not good, but not bad with him still not turned 22 till late this season. 

Pretty bad for a DH, though. 

We know he's horrible at 3B, and that he's played some 1B.  I wonder if he's any good there, or if he's bad there too? 

Question:  for him to hit well enough and field well enough to play 1B is  possible but unlikely.  I know he's slow but he has a good arm.  I wonder if they would look at him for LF at some point?  Or is too slow, and he can't judge fly balls, and his mental ability to stay awake and pay attention in the outfield is too lacking?  I guess I'm thinking that if he played some LF/RF, that there might come a time when he'd be more useful as a bench player, or have an easier time getting into the lineup perhaps as an anti-awful. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 10, 2011, 09:54:28 am
Love it when optimism for a first rounder start s to be that he might make it as a bench player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 10, 2011, 10:03:06 am
I'm still on the Vitters bandwagon (if such a thing exists).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 10, 2011, 10:04:15 am
The games I have seen play at 1st he has looked really good making some nice digs and a few stretches to get the runner on a bang bang play......I've been for the move to first since I seen him play his first game. Atleast this way he can't sail one into the first base stands.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 10, 2011, 10:06:39 am
The Vitters Bandwagon

(http://images.google.com/url?source=imgres&ct=img&q=http://www.bicyclestricyclesblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Radio-Flyer-wagons.jpg&sa=X&ei=fjLyTfKKDcS5tgfokN2rAw&ved=0CAQQ8wc4EQ&usg=AFQjCNGhLCg5hQrBvtKcfutDOMrgsCrArA)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 10, 2011, 10:26:51 am
At least this way he can't sail one into the first base stands.

Are you daring him to?  If he actually makes the conversion and sticks around, I am certain he will at some point show that he still can, even while playing firstbase.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 10, 2011, 11:41:27 am
Only player in TN Smokies history to make you watch batting/fielding practice if your sitting on the first base  ;D
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 10, 2011, 12:11:20 pm
Love it when optimism for a first rounder start s to be that he might make it as a bench player.
Haven't you often pointed out that most first round choices never even make it as a bench player?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 10, 2011, 12:23:49 pm
Cute.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 10, 2011, 12:34:17 pm
Haven't you often pointed out that most first round choices never even make it as a bench player?

In the 2001 draft, counting supplemental picks, there were 44 first round picks.  Ten years later, 18 of them still do not have a single day in the majors.  Another four still have not played 30 games in the majors.  That is right at half, and several of the others did not amount to being decent bench players.

In the 2000 draft, counting supplemental picks,  16 of the 40 still have not seen a single game in the majors, including five of the first ten.  Of the remainder of the 40, Luis Montanez (the Cubs 1st pick and #3 overall) has so far had a better major league career than 7 of them.

In the 1999 draft, 51 picks, 28 of them never seeing a single day in the majors, including 3 of the first 6.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 10, 2011, 12:34:18 pm
Short term goals should be defined and reachable.  Long term goals should be defined and reachable.  Short term goals should lead to the completion of long term goals.

There is nothing wrong with a goal of "being competitive in 2011", as long as it does not conflict with the goal of "winning" in 2015."

And it doesn't.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 10, 2011, 12:41:08 pm
You are less likely to reach your goal if you lose the team in the meantime.

Your simplistic view assumes that everyone has only one goal.  In the real world, this is impossible without unacceptable sacrifices in other goals.

Having no financial stake, you have little interest in the financial health of the owners.  The Ricketts family probably feels differently.  And to expect them to act differently is rather silly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 10, 2011, 12:45:00 pm
The games I have seen play at 1st he has looked really good making some nice digs and a few stretches to get the runner on a bang bang play......I've been for the move to first since I seen him play his first game. Atleast this way he can't sail one into the first base stands.

Thanks, cwells, that's encouraging.  1B defense is very important, so if he's got the aptitude, that makes a lot of sense. 

1B isn't real patient with so-so hitters, of course.  And sometimes 1B gets occupied by a really good hitter.  So I still think it would make a lot of sense for Vitters to see what he could do in the outfield.  Might be difficult, I suppose, if he wouldn't be able to throw half-way straight, and if as I expect he's pretty much been infield all his life.  But if he ends up hitting enough that he's worth playing, it would open possibilities if he could play LF or RF and be better than awful defensively. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 10, 2011, 12:47:23 pm
BA's Hot Sheet Helium Watch:

Quote
Jeimer Candelario, 3b, Cubs. July 2 is right around the corner, which means Baseball America's reports on the top international prospects will start next week. Meanwhile the summer leagues in Venezuela and the Dominican Republic are underway, with the majority of last year's international signings making their debuts in those leagues. One of the early standouts has been Cubs third baseman Jeimer Candelario, a $500,000 signing out of the Dominican Republic last summer (although he was born in New York) who has come better than advertised. Candelario, 17, earned praise from scouts for his potential to hit for average and power from both sides of the plate. Even better, his approach at the plate is quite mature for his age, as he's already drawn 12 walks in 34 plate appearances. Sure, it's early, but he's off to a .364/.588/.455 start and leading the DSL in OBP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 10, 2011, 01:14:52 pm
Who does Flaherty have to blow to get a shot with the big club?  He's at .313 -394-587-981, and he's almost 25 years old.  Have they soured on him because he takes a few walks?

HA!  Take that, auto-censor!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 10, 2011, 01:16:29 pm
You have to figure Flaherty at least has to get a promotion to Iowa in the not too distant future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 10, 2011, 01:17:31 pm
How is it not too early to call LeMahieu and re-call a .100 hitting Colvin, but not Flaherty?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 10, 2011, 01:17:35 pm
BA's Hot Sheet Helium Watch:Jeimer Candelario, 3b, Cubs. July 2 is right around the corner, which means Baseball America's reports on the top international prospects will start next week. Meanwhile the summer leagues in Venezuela and the Dominican Republic are underway, with the majority of last year's international signings making their debuts in those leagues. One of the early standouts has been Cubs third baseman Jeimer Candelario, a $500,000 signing out of the Dominican Republic last summer (although he was born in New York) who has come better than advertised. Candelario, 17, earned praise from scouts for his potential to hit for average and power from both sides of the plate. Even better, his approach at the plate is quite mature for his age, as he's already drawn 12 walks in 34 plate appearances. Sure, it's early, but he's off to a .364/.588/.455 start and leading the DSL in OBP.


Is it too early to call him up?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 10, 2011, 01:24:05 pm
OF Brandon May now with Peoria after recovering from Valley Fever.

http://www.pjstar.com/sports/chiefs/x41283525/May-full-of-smiles-in-return-to-team
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 10, 2011, 01:49:08 pm
OF Brandon May now with Peoria after recovering from Valley Fever.

http://www.pjstar.com/sports/chiefs/x41283525/May-full-of-smiles-in-return-to-team
Correction - Brandon May is a 1B
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on June 10, 2011, 01:50:45 pm
Any relation to Derrick?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 10, 2011, 02:11:36 pm
Having no financial stake, you have little interest in the financial health of the owners.  The Ricketts family probably feels differently.  And to expect them to act differently is rather silly.

I don't believe I have ever indicated that I expect Cub ownership to take the approach I would like, but that also doesn't make me like it any less, or believe it would be the best approach to take.

As to the financial health of the team, the Tigers were 81-81 in 2000.  A "competitive" team, and it drew 2,438,617 fans. .  The next few years the team stopped being competitive, and in 2003, while rebuilding, they lost 119 games and saw attendance drop to 1,368,245.  The team payroll went from something around $51M in 2000 to about $37M in 2003.   Three years later, 2006, when they were in the WS, they drew 2,595,937, and in 2007, with a 2nd place finish and a record of 88-74 attendance climbed to 3,047,133.  All of those years were in the same park, and to me it indicates that while attendance will decline during a full rebuild, so will payroll, and attendance will return when the team finishes its rebuilding and begins winning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 10, 2011, 04:28:26 pm
Perhaps the Ricketts realized they couldn't drastically reduce payroll in 2011 with Sori, ARam, Fuku, Demp, Z, Byrd and Grabow already signed to long-term contracts without experiencing freefalling attendance. So they approved (or ordered) short-term investments in Pena and Garza in an effort to "remain competitive" in 2011. Perhaps their plan is to start a complete rebuild in 2012. But I'm not betting on it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 10, 2011, 05:12:37 pm
Only one game for Iowa tonight.  The completion of last night's suspended game will be tomorrow night followed by a nine inning game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 10, 2011, 05:14:42 pm
Angel Guzman pitches for Peoria tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 10, 2011, 05:20:44 pm
Angel Guzman goes on the DL tomorrow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 10, 2011, 07:07:27 pm
Reed Johnson is DHing for Iowa tonight.  Jeff Baker is at first.  Ramon Ortiz pitches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 10, 2011, 07:38:43 pm
Guzman retires the side in order in the first.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 10, 2011, 07:42:37 pm
So wait...are they going to try to stretch Guzman out as a starter?  Or are they just starting him to make sure he gets work?  Seems like a very, very bad idea to try to have him work more than an inning at a time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 10, 2011, 07:49:01 pm
I think they often start rehab guys so they know exactly when they're going to pitch and can plan and warmup on a controlled timeline. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 10, 2011, 07:54:22 pm
Guzman retired three batters in the second inning, striking out 2.  He was then taken out of the game, presumably on pitch count.

Or maybe his arm fell off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 10, 2011, 08:48:51 pm
Perhaps the Ricketts realized they couldn't drastically reduce payroll in 2011 with Sori, ARam, Fuku, Demp, Z, Byrd and Grabow already signed to long-term contracts without experiencing freefalling attendance. So they approved (or ordered) short-term investments in Pena and Garza in an effort to "remain competitive" in 2011. Perhaps their plan is to start a complete rebuild in 2012.

Perhaps.  The problem is that while fans will return to watch a strong team, the long the team is in the crapper, the harder it is to get them back, and all this season did was delay by one year the first year that they could possibly be a strong team.  A full rebuild needs to write of two seasons, two years when the team really should pay no attention to W/L record, and will consequently generally be pretty terrible.  Adding a 2011-type season onto the front of that will mean it will take a little longer to sell out again once the team actually becomes a player in a pennant race again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 10, 2011, 09:27:32 pm
Smokies game completed in 5 due to rain.


Struck: 5-4-0-0-0-6 , 2-2, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_10_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Rhee: 4-2/3 -8-5-5-3-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_10_dbcafa_lakafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 10, 2011, 09:45:03 pm
Perhaps.  The problem is that while fans will return to watch a strong team, the long the team is in the crapper, the harder it is to get them back, and all this season did was delay by one year the first year that they could possibly be a strong team.  A full rebuild needs to write of two seasons, two years when the team really should pay no attention to W/L record, and will consequently generally be pretty terrible.  Adding a 2011-type season onto the front of that will mean it will take a little longer to sell out again once the team actually becomes a player in a pennant race again.

You know what else a "full rebuild" needs?  A top flight player procurement and development organization.  Doing what you've been proposing when you have a well below average system would be a waste of time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 10, 2011, 09:47:00 pm
Szczur: 1-5, 3 K

Suarez: 1-2/3 -1-0-0-0-3 ; ( 9-2/3 IP, 2 BB, 13 K )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_10_souafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 10, 2011, 10:12:44 pm
You know what else a "full rebuild" needs?  A top flight player procurement and development organization.  Doing what you've been proposing when you have a well below average system would be a waste of time.

Not really.  Stock enough prospects and some will develop.  The problem with the approach most seem to want the team to pursue is that it requires nearly perfect judgement.  We have often discussed here how one player or another might be a LIAB move, or how some collection of players might constitute a LIAB approach with an entire team.  The approach most seem to support requires LIAB judgement and moves on any number of players and trades and signings.  That is one of the reasons I would like to see a full rebuild.  You stock the system with prospects and enough of them should develop that you do not need perfect execution or judgement or scouting or talent evaluation or projection.  Just focus on stocking with prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 10, 2011, 10:49:59 pm
I thought Struck's jump to AA seemed premature, because i hadn't thought he'd done that well in A+.  But he's handled that jump rather smoothly.  He's only 21, and will remain only 21 all season.  I wonder how good his stuff really is?  On the year he's got 19 walks and 2 HR in 63 innings.  That works out pretty well.  And 53K/19BB/63IP is pretty decent. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 10, 2011, 10:59:52 pm
I agree with Jeff that the procurement-development system needs to work better than it has.  Perhaps it's ready to kick in, I always hope so. 

Spend enough and you can buy some contender years, Hendry proved that in 07-08.  But the system had led to a bad and awful team in 05-06, so it was totally a function of money to try to upgrade.  The system wasn't producing enough.  Nor did it during 07-08, so now that we're again depending more on what the system can deliver, it's dreadful. 

It's certainly not as if having given Ronny Cedeno, Matt Murton, Eric Patterson, Sean Gallagher, Rich Hill, Micah Hoffpauir, Felix Pie, and Donnie Veal years of playing time would have "rebuilt" anything.  The system simply hasn't produced players to build with.  And it's not like we had a stack of high-value trade chips to acquire from elsewhere what we can't produce ourselves.  Trading DLee might have gotten an extra B prospect or two, but Hendry really hasn't had high-value trade-chips to shop.  So even if he'd gone and stuck with "total rebuild" from 06 on, I don't think he'd have really been able to augment the poor stock of home grown guys to build anything with. 

To build, you've got to produce your own good young talent.  FleiHendry haven't been up to that thus far.  Hopefully this week's draft will help to change that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 10, 2011, 11:11:57 pm
Mateo still stinking it up:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_10_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2011, 04:21:47 am
Candelario drew 3 more walks yesterday. We're never going to learn if he can hit if he never swings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 11, 2011, 08:31:25 am
Trading DLee might have gotten an extra B prospect or two, but Hendry really hasn't had high-value trade-chips to shop. 

Trading vets for prospects (and I suspect Lee would have brought more than a couple of B level prospects, but that is a different issue) is only part of it.  Letting vets go and taking the draft picks is another big part of it.  Take a look at the first and second round draft picks the Braves had under Schuerholz.  One reason they had the steady flow of talent thru their system is that they got far more early picks than most teams, and they got them because Schuerholz let players go via FA to get the picks, and signed relatively few FA in moves where he lost picks.  Both parts of that equation are important, and it is an equation the Cubs have seemed absolutely incapable of understanding.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 11, 2011, 12:01:11 pm
A good example of that was the Rays this year.  They had 3 first round choices and SEVEN supplemental choices this year.  In fact, they had so many that they have already announced that they will sign NO superslot prospects this year because their budget can not afford it.

The biggest complaint I have against Hendry has been his refusal to offer arbitration to veterans that are leaving.  In a very few cases, arbitration would be a bad idea, but in most cases, a one year deal is not the worst thing that can happen, and the extra draft choice is the best thing.  At least last year they traded Lee and got a little bit.  But I think if we had offered arbitration to him, he might have refused, and brought in a good draft pick.  At the worst, we would have Lee at first instead of May, at probably the same price and production.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 11, 2011, 12:49:25 pm
Yes. 


I've several times wished Hendry would be more willing to offer arb. 


It works best, though, under two circumstances which have rarely never applied to Hendry's system.


1.  When you've got a good procurement-development system.  When you've got a volume of young talent rising, you can replace a good vet with a rising player.  In NFL, that's how Green Bay is set up.  And that's how Schuerholz had it with Atlanta.  It's harder to let good FA's walk when you're going to replace DLee with Brandon Sing, or Aram with Matt Craig.  Not sure who would have been in line to replace Zambrano when he was approaching FA; Donnie Veal or somebody like that? 


2.  Age also factors.  If you procure-and-develop your own good young players, you might have some guys who become FA's while they are young and desirable.  But Corey Patterson and Ryan Theriot never reached a place where they were going to be desirable FA's who would net you picks.  When you can't produce much talent of your own, and you depend on FA to get guys, then they'll be pretty old and in decline when they become 2nd-time FA's for you.  When Lilly and DLee were aproaching FA's last year, we knew they weren't going to net anything.  Nomar and Todd Walker, you don't get picks for guys like that.  FA's who are both GOOD and YOUNG are desirable, like many of the Tampa guys.   Lilly, Dempster, Aram when he reaches, Soriano, nope.   FA's like Nomar, Todd Walker, Alfonseca, Moises Alou, nope. 


If we had let Aram and DLee go the first time they approached FA, they'd have both been signed.  LIkewise Dempster would have been signed. 


Absolutely if we let Marshall and Marmol go the first chance we get, they'll get signed. 


But when your procurement-development system just doesn't procure and develop, on the rare occasion when you come up with somebody who's half-way decent and less than 34, it's probably hard to let them go. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 11, 2011, 01:56:59 pm
Yes. 


I've several times wished Hendry would be more willing to offer arb. 


It works best, though, under two circumstances which have rarely never applied to Hendry's system.


1.  When you've got a good procurement-development system.  When you've got a volume of young talent rising, you can replace a good vet with a rising player.  In NFL, that's how Green Bay is set up.  And that's how Schuerholz had it with Atlanta.  It's harder to let good FA's walk when you're going to replace DLee with Brandon Sing, or Aram with Matt Craig.  Not sure who would have been in line to replace Zambrano when he was approaching FA; Donnie Veal or somebody like that? 


True, but I was talking about those who the Cubs have decided NOT to sign.  Lee was an example, as well as Lilly.  Of course, the most striking was Andre Dawson under the precious administration, but there were others, and we will soon be faced with the same situation with Dempster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 11, 2011, 02:55:54 pm
Craig, getting more high round draft picks is essential to having a good "procurement-development system."  It is not a matter of offering arb only after you have a good "procurement-development system," but one of offering arb in order to develop it, and to have multiple high draft picks so the team need not gamble so much with the picks it does have.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 11, 2011, 03:43:29 pm
Something that I have wondered about for years, but have never heard anyone address, or even mention the issue.

For years, perhaps even for decades, the powerhouse of the world little league series has been Taiwan.  But very few Taiwanese players ever surface in the big leagues other than as fringe players.  Has anyone ever heard an explanation for that?  I know there have been some good ones, but I don't think there have been more than a handful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on June 11, 2011, 04:11:17 pm
I always thought it was because they all end up about 5' and weigh 110 lbs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 11, 2011, 05:07:10 pm
Quote
Craig, getting more high round draft picks is essential to having a good "procurement-development system."  It is not a matter of offering arb only after you have a good "procurement-development system," but one of offering arb in order to develop it


I love draft picks and prospects, so I'd love to have more picks.  So I've often wished Hendry was more daring in terms of offering arb. 


But I don't agree that it's essential to get comp picks in order to procure players that can be developed.  If you don't have extra picks but you want to value procurement, you can overslot and superslot (as Ricketts seems eager to do this year), and you can invest internationally (as Ricketts seemed eager to do last year.)  It's not like NFL or NBA. 


Most comp picks are sandwich picks, basically 2nd round guys even though it's classified as 1st round.  There are relatively few late in the first round, and of course none in the first 15.  The Cubs have had an awful lot of mid-high first round picks during Hendry's domain.  Obviously Jackson was late, and Cashner was only in the late teens.  Brownlie was in the 20's.  But we've had a lot of relatively high ones:
Baez 9
Simpson 13?
Jackson way late, 32?
Cashner around 18 or so?
Vitters 4
Colvin 14
Harvey 6?
Pawelek around 22 maybe?
Brownlie around 22 maybe?
Prior 2
Wood 4
Corey 3
Christensen around 8 or so? 
Montanez 3?
Garland maybe 8? 
Noel around 12? 


Given how mostly bad the Cubs have been during Hendry's 15 years, he and his hired brains have not lacked for 1st round opportunities. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 11, 2011, 05:34:28 pm
I always thought it was because they all end up about 5' and weigh 110 lbs

I think the Cubs have a Taiwanese pitcher that stands about 6' 6".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 11, 2011, 06:41:14 pm
 RH Ty'Relle Harris joins the I-Cubs from Tennessee.  Harris is 1-0 with a 2.10 ERA in 17 games with the Smokies.  He was one of three minor league pitchers the Cubs acquired from Atlanta for 1B Derek Lee last August.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 11, 2011, 07:53:17 pm
Simpson getting whacked again.

Richard Jones now has 10 HR in 48 games for Peoria.  That guy has some real power.  Probably his only  quality.


Tennessee has not one, not two, but eight doubles tonight.  That's not something the big Cubs have often had.  Clevenger, Spencer, and Vitters back-to-back-to-back in the lineup each with a pair.  Vitters is gotten up to .290, and his OPS I think is now up in the .770's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 11, 2011, 08:11:28 pm
RHP Tzu-An Wang, who received a $300K bonus from Taiwan in 2009, has been released.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/06/minor-league-transactions-june-1-7/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 11, 2011, 08:20:56 pm
RH Ty'Relle Harris joins the I-Cubs from Tennessee.  Harris is 1-0 with a 2.10 ERA in 17 games with the Smokies.  He was one of three minor league pitchers the Cubs acquired from Atlanta for 1B Derek Lee last August.

27 walks in 34-1/3 IP.  Bring him up!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2011, 08:22:24 pm
Vitters: 3-4, 2 2B

Jackson: 1-4, 2 K , ( 6 for last 39 w/ 13 K )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_11_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Cabrera not excelling in the PCL

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_09_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 11, 2011, 08:24:33 pm
RHP Tzu-An Wang, who received a $300K bonus from Taiwan in 2009, has been released.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/06/minor-league-transactions-june-1-7/

Well, as long as his bonus was from Taiwan and not us, who cares?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 11, 2011, 08:31:35 pm
Vitters now to a 10 game hit streak as well....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2011, 08:43:09 pm
Candelario: 2-3, HR, 2 RBI, 2 BB, 3 E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_11_drgrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2011, 09:04:46 pm
Ha: 3-4, 2B, RBI, BB

Bour: 2-4, HR, SF, 3 RBI, 2 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_11_clrafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 11, 2011, 09:06:14 pm
Vitters now to a 10 game hit streak as well....

Vitters is now hitting about 290 for the season, and about .400 for his last 10 games, but he has had enough trouble adjusting to new leagues after promotion that it might be a good idea to leave him where he is even if he hits .400 for the rest of the year.  If he does that, it would still allow for a September callup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2011, 10:06:52 pm
Szczur: 2-5, HR, 2 RBI, CS

Simpson: 4-7-5-5-2-1 , WP, BK

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_11_souafx_peoafx_1


Iowa GM 2:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_11_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 11, 2011, 10:09:12 pm
They should have just left Simpson at EXT for the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 12, 2011, 01:14:48 am
Something that I have wondered about for years, but have never heard anyone address, or even mention the issue.

For years, perhaps even for decades, the powerhouse of the world little league series has been Taiwan.  But very few Taiwanese players ever surface in the big leagues other than as fringe players.  Has anyone ever heard an explanation for that?  I know there have been some good ones, but I don't think there have been more than a handful.

Taiwan hasn't won a LLWS in years - I think there's a pretty broad consensus that they took advantage of some lax rules in terms of the pool of players they could draw from, as well as slipped some overage kids through when it was easier to get away with that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 12, 2011, 01:45:04 am
thanks, Deeg.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 12, 2011, 10:06:45 am
Szczur for the season: .337/.394/.462/.856, 4 HR, and 40 runs in 43 games at Peoria.  14/4 in steals.

If he continues with this for a couple more weeks, wouldn't it make sense to promote him at least to Daytona in mid-season?  Assuming he did well at Daytona, it would make Tennessee the default assignment for 2012, and possibly even Peoria in 2012.  If he started in Tennessee in 2012 and did well, a mid-season promotion to Iowa would be perfectly reasonable, and possibly even to Chicago.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 12, 2011, 10:46:39 am
Dave, what Deeg says is true, but in addition, often Asian athletes don't improve as much as they age.  They are much better and more mature at a younger age, body-wise.  I had Asian players for both basketball and baseball, and they were very good, making the Varsity as freshmen...but then they just didn't get a whole lot better.  By the time they were seniors, they were still on the Varsity, but unlike their teammates, they just hadn't gotten a whole lot better and were bypassed.

That's what I think of with Choi and why I really admire Ichiro.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 12, 2011, 11:33:31 am
3B Jeimer Candelario is on a tear in the DSL.

10-27 plus 17 walks = an OBP of .614

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=3B&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=600869
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 12, 2011, 11:57:40 am
His OBA is higher than his slugging average.  He sounds like Fukudome.

Isn't the B team less advanced than the A team.  I wonder when they will promote him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 12, 2011, 01:14:24 pm
Alfonso Soriano is batting third and playing left for Iowa today.  Welington Castillo is the DH.  That's where I thought they'd put Alfie.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2011, 03:51:19 pm
Kirk: 6-4-0-0-0-7


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_12_souafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2011, 03:54:40 pm
Jeff Beliveau pulled off a pretty amazing feat today:

Fanned the side in the 6th on 9 pitches, then fanned the first two in the 7th on 6 pitches. 15 straight strikes, 5 K's. The next batter flied out on the first pitch.


Jackson: 2-4, RBI, BB, K, PO

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_12_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2011, 03:57:32 pm
Castillo: 2-3, HR, RBI, BB

Jackson: 6-9-5-5-0-6, 2 HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_12_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 12, 2011, 05:17:59 pm
That must be Jackson's first two-hit game in a month or so. 

Thanks for note on Bellivieu's strike-throwing.  16 pitches, 16 K's, pretty amazing.  Over his last ten outings, 12.1 innings, 15K/1BB/4hits, no runs.  On the year, he's not 45K/10walks/34.4 innings, with a 0.55 or so ERA.  And only one HR. 

He's always been a K-machine, but this control business is weird.  Beeler got whacked around later but I think he threw all strikes in his first inning at least. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 12, 2011, 05:22:48 pm
Beliveau continues to put up outstanding numbers, and never seems to climb on anyone's prospect list.  I assume that it is because he is a soft-tossing lefty that does not have the "stuff" to excel in the majors.  But I don't remember any scouting report on him that would explain so many people putting him on "ignore".

Does anyone know what he throws?  He certainly doesn't seem to have the typical control problems that so many Cub prospects and major leaguers have.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 12, 2011, 05:31:44 pm
dave, cwells52 discussed Bellivieu recently.  Said he's a little guy but that the ball jumps out of his hand pretty nicely. 

Until this spring, he's had very bad walk-problems.  He played some SS in college, I believe. 

Seems like a guy who has just kept getting better and better.  Obviously people don't often get as excited about intermediate lefty relief pitchers as they do about starters.  I suspect that's why he doesn't get as much discussion.  But a good reliever helps a lot, and most really good teams have a handful of them. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 12, 2011, 05:32:28 pm
wallach back off DL for Daytona today. 

I'm not much of a Castillo guy, since guys who K so much tend to get dominated in the majors.  He's got 40K in 140 AB or so this spring, although that's after getting hot lately.  It was even worse earlier.  But, if you hit enough HR''s, that's OK.  6HR/31K at Iowa, if he could sustain that kind of K-rate in the majors he'd have a career.  His walk rate in past has typically been abysmal, too, but this year it's OK.  He's 24, it's too bad he wasn't able to start healthy and get in a full season at Iowa to see where he can equilibrate at this point in his development.  Might be a 4A catcher, or an OK backup.  I doubt he's hitting enough to have any major trade value.  Probably something like a Colvin offensively, lots of holes in his swing and if he's not keeping his average up with HR's, his offense will be pretty poor.  But, who knows. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 12, 2011, 05:33:56 pm
Has anybody ever seen or gotten any velocity reports on Kirk?  Often when a guy emerges and pitches really good, it turns out that his fastball is better than it was.  I think I'm still wondering whether he's basically an 80's guy, or whether he's gotten back to the low-90's that they talked about from when he was drafted. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2011, 05:47:05 pm
I posted something on the old WC board last year that I found on Beliveau. It said he was 92-93 with his FB. I believe he's always had a nasty slider.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 12, 2011, 06:25:24 pm
....Jeff Beliveau was very impressive again tonight topping out at 90 but it just explodes out of his hand is on the hitters before they know it. Dolis also pitched well tonight topping out at 94 then coming right back with an 80 mph change that had the batter falling down. ...

cwells posted than on June 5. 

He had a Belliveau post earlier, probably in May, as well. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 12, 2011, 06:30:56 pm
.....He looks good everytime he pitches, nice explosion out of the hand and I think that is the key for his success.....He does have a nice breaking ball but is a little guy, he definitely looks small than 190 to me. Didn't really notice the radar that is out in leftfield but he pitched well.....


May 28 quote from cwells. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2011, 07:32:00 pm
Cerda: 3-4, 2B, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_12_clrafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 12, 2011, 11:23:20 pm
An nsbb poster said he watched AA, said Belivieu was 90-93 today on the gun.  Thought the box score was wrong about the 16 straight strikes, though.  Said Smit was 95, and said Beeler looked very good, was 90-93 with good movement but not advanced breaking ball. 

He said that Marwin was smooth and will play in the majors. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 13, 2011, 09:59:07 am
Vitters:

.289/.327/.453/.780

.292 BABIP
Title: Flaherty
Post by: ticohans on June 13, 2011, 10:11:25 am
So what kind of ceiling does Flaherty have? I'm wondering if Casey Blake might be a good comp. Solid stats across the board, some defensive flexibility despite a larger frame. With the state of the 3b position at the major league level, I would be quite pleased with Blake level production from Flaherty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 13, 2011, 12:04:29 pm
More and more, Brett Jackson is becoming Tyler Colvin II.  At least this version can take a walk, I guess.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 13, 2011, 12:22:13 pm
More and more, Brett Jackson is becoming Tyler Colvin II.  At least this version can take a walk, I guess.

I think you're underestimating the value of the second half of your statement.  Tyler Colvin has a .319 OBP at the minor league level.  Brett Jackson is at .399.  That's the difference between someone who is barely playable at an offensive position in the majors and someone who could be in the top 10 or so in OBP in the league. 

If Brett Jackson can continue walking and hit .260 at the major league level, he'll be a very productive player.  Tyler Colvin would have to hit .300 to be as productive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 13, 2011, 12:28:26 pm
More and more, Brett Jackson is becoming Tyler Colvin II.  At least this version can take a walk, I guess.

Colvin        OBP                OPS
2006            313               796
2007            324               812
2008            312               736
2009            332               812
2011            283               783

Jackson
2009           418              1,170
2010           395                 888
2011           385                 850

Colvin average OPS           787.8
Jackson average OPS         969.3

The similarity is amazing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 13, 2011, 01:09:51 pm
If you extrapolate Jackson's numbers, he becomes Colvin in about 2019.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 13, 2011, 03:51:15 pm
With Lake at SS and Watkins at 2B, it was all 3B for Cerda early.  But the Lake promotion has enabled him to play 2B.  His splits are now 39 games at 3B, 19 at 2B.  He's got 7 errors total; not sure how that ranks, but I seem to recall about 3 of them coming within his first week at 3B this April. 

Obviously he's a dinky guy at 5'9" with no power, of his 71 hits only 15 are for extra bases, IsoP of only .074.  But he's hitting .309 with a .412 OBP, and he's only 20 years old.  Not sure what advantage getting older will have for him, since by account he's been a workout guy for some time and it's not like he's going to physically mature into HR hits. 

He's a pretty high BABIP guy, pretty hard to sustain .300 when you're K'ing as much as he does (20%).  But might not be that hard to sustain .360+ OBP when you walk as much as he does, and being so short have such a small strike zone. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 13, 2011, 06:24:32 pm
Jackson is batting .259, with 41K's in 147 ABs.  Sorry, that's not impressive.  His walks are supporting him a lot, but right now he's a slightly improved version of Colvin.  This is not exciting when he's your supposed best position prospect.

If you are so excited about his prospects, I would also expect you to want to re-sign Fukudome because he is way better than Jackson is right now, with a BA around .300 and an OBP over .400.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 13, 2011, 06:27:39 pm
80 points of OBP is in no shape or form "slightly improved". 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 13, 2011, 07:03:11 pm
"right now he's a slightly improved version of Colvin."

Right now is a small sample compared to his career numbers. Right now is also post injury from which he may not be completely recovered.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 13, 2011, 07:05:23 pm
"I would also expect you to want to re-sign Fukudome because he is way better than Jackson is right now, with a BA around .300 and an OBP over .400."

Ignoring cost, as your assertion does, I would love to have Fukudome on the team. He's a fantastic player. The reason Fukudome may not be resigned has little to do with his performance this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 13, 2011, 07:19:44 pm
Jackson is batting .259, with 41K's in 147 ABs.  Sorry, that's not impressive.  His walks are supporting him a lot, but right now he's a slightly improved version of Colvin.  This is not exciting when he's your supposed best position prospect.

I have never been a strong Jackson fan, mainly because of his high strike out rate.  But as you say, he is having a poor year this year.  And that POOR year is better in terms of OPS than Colvin's BEST year.

If you want to say that Jackson is not a good prospect, fine.  Justify that.  But to compare him to Colvin seems so unfounded as to be rather silly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 13, 2011, 07:39:50 pm
Obviously he's a dinky guy at 5'9" with no power....  But might not be that hard to sustain .360+ OBP when you walk as much as he does, and being so short have such a small strike zone.

Willie Mays, at 5'10", was a whopping one inch taller, and did have a little bit of power in a couple of seasons.  Hack Wilson was 5'6".  I am not saying anyone should expect Lake to hit for power, but his height is likely not the reason he will not, if he does not.

As to "such a small strike zone, how much difference, by percentage, would there be between the strike zone of a player 5'9" and 6'?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 13, 2011, 07:42:22 pm
Jackson is batting .259, with 41K's in 147 ABs.  Sorry, that's not impressive.  His walks are supporting him a lot, but right now he's a slightly improved version of Colvin.

180 OPS points, and a year younger than Colvin to produce that OPS difference.

How large a difference is needed before it is no longer a slight improvement?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 13, 2011, 07:44:35 pm
80 points of OBP is in no shape or form "slightly improved". 

Actually 180 points.... if Dave's figures are right.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 13, 2011, 07:58:14 pm
Two more "slight improvements" that Brett Jackson gives you over Tyler Colvin is stolen bases and excellent defense in center field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 13, 2011, 08:05:16 pm
I think Jackson leads the Cubs minor league outfielders in errors?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 13, 2011, 08:15:30 pm
Jackson has 4 errors this year.  Don't know about the other Cub outfielders.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 13, 2011, 08:50:40 pm
If you are so excited about his prospects, I would also expect you to want to re-sign Fukudome because he is way better than Jackson is right now, with a BA around .300 and an OBP over .400.

After Castro and Soto, Fukudome is the position player I'd most want the Cubs to bring back next year (assuming he'd sign for $5 million or so).  Pena and Ramirez should walk, Byrd should be traded for something decent, Soriano should be dumped, and Barney should head to the bench where he belongs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 13, 2011, 09:03:38 pm
Jeffrey Baez: 4-5, 2 2B, 2 RBI, SB, E

Daniel Sanchez: 1-3, 2B, RBI, BB, K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_13_dparok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 13, 2011, 09:11:01 pm
Jackson: 1-2, SF, RBI, 2 BB, K, CS


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_13_tenaax_cmcaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Kurcz: 3-3-0-0-1-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_13_clrafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb



Chiefs idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 13, 2011, 09:27:50 pm
Castillo: 3-4, 2B, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_13_iowaaa_omaaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 13, 2011, 09:28:38 pm
Dolis seems to be doing fairly well since being moved into relief
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 13, 2011, 09:30:33 pm
Jeffrey Baez and Daniel Sanchez were both $350K signings last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 13, 2011, 09:32:26 pm
Dolis has a good ERA but his peripherals are nothing to write home about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 13, 2011, 09:34:03 pm
Quite a few guys on both DR teams are taking a lot of walks.

I assume that is due to bad opponent pitching, rather than to plate discipline.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 13, 2011, 11:47:29 pm
Candelario: 2-5, 2 RBI, 2 K

Penalver: 2-3, 2B, 3 RBI, 2 BB, SB, CS


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_13_dchrok_dyarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2011, 01:25:45 am
Candelario: 2-4, RBI

Penalver: 0-0, 2 BB, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_13_dyarok_dchrok_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 14, 2011, 07:49:08 am
Quite a few guys on both DR teams are taking a lot of walks.   I assume that is due to bad opponent pitching, rather than to plate discipline.

While it might be that, it might also indicate a change in emphasis.  Walk totals seem to be up for both Cubs DSL teams.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 14, 2011, 09:53:20 am
It probably does have more to do with bad opponent pitching.

DSL pitchers average 4.5 walks per 9 IP.

Even in the Arizona rookie league, pitchers there only average 3.1 walks per 9 IP.  Northwest League average is 3.43 BB's.  Florida State League average is 3.25 BB's.  Southern League average is 3.5 BB's.

There are a lot of wild pitchers our Dominican hitters are facing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 14, 2011, 10:24:10 am

It probably does have more to do with bad opponent pitching.  DSL pitchers average 4.5 walks per 9 IP.

But in isolation, the is somewhat meaningless.  To put it in context we also need to know if that number is up from prior years, and more than my casual glance at the Cub DSL walk figures from this year compared to last year and 2009 (they SEEMED to be higher this year, but I didn't take the time to meaningfully check, largely because the source I saw did not include team totals).

If the DSL pitchers also averaged 4.5 walks per game last year and in 2009, and the Cub DSL walk figures are appreciably up, that would still seem to indicate that the Cubs may be encouraging them to be more selective, perhaps something which would be easier to impress on them in nice clubhouse/classroom facilities in those nice facilities the Cubs have reportedly built down there.  If the DSL pitchers have become more wild, then any increased walk totals may not mean much.  We need some more context.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 14, 2011, 12:09:34 pm
The five dollar guys in DSL:
1.  3b Candelerio:  .389, 17BB/6K/36 AB.  (He went 9 AB without a walk yesterday, may have gotten the Cubs "be aggressive" memo?)
2.  SS/2B Penalver:  .297, 12BB/5K/37 AB.
3.  SS Gonzalez:  .279, 11BB/12K/43 AB.

So on the DSL2 team, the 3 17-year-olds have a combined 40 walks in 116 AB. 

4.  CF Jeff Baez: .333, 8BB/10K/45AB
5.  SS Francisco Sanchez:  .262, 7BB/16K/42AB, 5 of 11 hits for extras (including 2 HR)

Overall a VERY nice start for the dollar guys.  In past I don't recall BA providing lists of the 6-figure guys, so maybe we've had a bunch before but we as fans just didn't know who to focus on.  But there have been some other times when we did know a dollar guy or two, and they were lousy.  In any event, few have walked like these guy have, that's for sure. 

Of the three dollar pitchers, the news isn't quite as perfect.  The lefty Mejias hasn't pitched yet, so I assume something is wrong.  Abreau was actually signed before last summer's DSL, and he pitched really wild then.  He's been less wild so far, but still pretty wild.  But Alex Santana has been a workhorse and has only 4 walks in 19 innings with a 1.4 ERA.  When a 17-year-old gets some money, he's got some arm projection.  If a guy with a good arm throws strikes, I get very hopeful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 14, 2011, 12:20:39 pm
jes, you did make a good point about the Cubs improving a lot relative to the rest of the DSL in drawing walks.  Believe it or not, the DSL Cubs #1 and #2 teams are 1st and 2nd in the league in BB/AB ratio.  (Shocking!)  This has indeed been a vast improvement for the Cubs DSL teams in recent years.
 
DSL Cubs #1

2011:  24.93%  (1st, Avg: 13.54%)
2010:  13.84%  (9th, Avg: 12.58%)
2009:  12.29%  (19th, Avg: 12.41%)
2008:  10.34%  (34th, Avg:  12.89%)

DSL Cubs #2

2011:  21.62%  (2nd, Avg: 13.54%)
2010:  10.15%  (28th, Avg:  12.58%)
2009:  10.98%  (28th, Avg:  12.41%)
2008:  13.68%  (14th, Avg:  12.89%)

Perhaps there might be some improved instruction going on with the new investments we've made down there.  Perhaps too, though, it's just a function of plain having better talent on the teams.  Both DSL teams have players with 6-figure bonuses on them, which I don't think has been the case for our DSL teams in a long time. 

By the way, the DSL league average in BB/9 IP hasn't changed that much over the years.  It's still around 4.2-4.5 walks per 9 IP, so pitchers in that league are a lot wilder than in normal minor leagues.  Also the average BB/AB rates for teams in the league has been over 12% each year, which is well above the 10% rate we've calculated for most teams in pro ball.

Still, seeing both Cub teams with walk rates over 20% in the Dominican is pretty amazing, even with the general wildness there is in the league.

Here are league averages the last few years for BB/9IP the last few years in the DSL:

2010:  4.19
2009:  4.21
2008:  4.34
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 14, 2011, 12:26:56 pm
By my calcs, Castro and Lake were 9% and 7% in DSL, for what it's worth.  (Using BB/AB rather than BB/PA).  The five dollar 17-year-olds thus far are a combined 27%. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 14, 2011, 12:33:30 pm
And one other thing is teams have only played 13-14 games apiece so far this year, so we're talking about a small sample size. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 14, 2011, 05:59:40 pm
Daytona infielder Matt Cerda and catcher Mike Brenly have been added to the FSL North All-Star team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 14, 2011, 06:07:39 pm
ArizonaPhil

I mentioned in a comment on a previous thread yesterday, Paul Hoilman (2011 19th round draft pick out of East Tennessee State) hit a 450+ ft HR over the CF Green Monster off Jin Young Kim in a "live" BP session at Field Park Field #2 yesterday morning.

Hoilman was the Home Run Derby champ at the 2010 College World Series, and finished tied for third in HR in NCAA Div-1 this season. I am going to go WAY out on a limb and predict that Hoilman will lead the Northwest League in HR. He is a beast.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 14, 2011, 06:11:00 pm
ArizonaPhil

Boise should have a pretty good team.

A starting rotation/piggyback group consisting of Liria-Wang-Wells-Reed-Kim-Cruz-Rosario are all quality arms, ex-OF Kyler Burke and ex-3B Charles Thomas have made tremendous strides in their conversions to pitcher, Pin-Chieh Chen really started to play well at Extended Spring Training once he was moved from 2B to CF and he could be a dynamite lead-off hitter, Yaniel Cabezas was unofficial EXST Cubs MVP (he led the team in RBI and handled himself very well behind the plate), and the quintet of Klafczynski-Hoilman-Fitzgerald-Golden-Contreras should be a powerful force in the middle of the Hawks order (DJ Fitz struggled big time at Peoria, but he should feast on the lesser pitching he'll see at Boise).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 14, 2011, 06:13:03 pm
Chris Carpenter has been called up by the Cubs....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 14, 2011, 08:05:42 pm
Perhaps there might be some improved instruction going on with the new investments we've made down there.

I was quite serious in my comment that perhaps the improve facility allows for improved instruction not just on the mechanics of the game, but in understanding things like the value of a walk and the importance of looking for a pitch that can be hit with authority.  That might simply be better absorbed in an air conditioned almost classroom type setting than out on the field in 95 degree temperatures.  Or perhaps the better facilities will (have?) also help in attracting better prospects, who will have better plate discipline.

And, yes, it is a small sample size, but the difference in the walk rates is large enough that even this early it appears to be significant and real.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on June 14, 2011, 08:51:06 pm
interesting move bringing up carpenter instead of some of the others. he needs more time in the minors if you ask me but who knows what will happen. LIAB has happened many times before!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 14, 2011, 08:58:21 pm
The five dollar 17-year-olds thus far are a combined 27%. 

We've always made the assumption that the DSL Cubs #1 team was more talented than DSL Cubs #2.  However, Cubs #2 has 3 of the 5 money position players, including the two guys with the highest bonuses in Penalver and Candelario.  Both teams may have a fairly even talent distribution.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2011, 09:00:59 pm
Candelario: 1-5, 2 K

Penalver: 1-5, SB, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_14_dchrok_dgirok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 14, 2011, 09:04:53 pm
Man, has Candelario gone downhill recently.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2011, 09:47:42 pm
Rosscup: 5-3-0-0-1-9


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_14_dbcafa_breafa_1


Tenn off
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 14, 2011, 09:53:53 pm
Rosscup has been pretty good this year.  I wish we could get a scouting report on him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 14, 2011, 09:55:52 pm
No problem.  He throws left handed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 14, 2011, 09:58:25 pm
Dave, that scouting report puts you on par with the vast majority of the scouts employed by the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2011, 10:29:38 pm
Cabrera: 6-10-5-5-1-6, 2 HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_14_iowaaa_omaaaa_1

Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_14_wisafx_peoafx_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 14, 2011, 10:31:22 pm
If you want details, you should specify.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on June 14, 2011, 10:40:39 pm
Soriano 0-6 in his last rehab game.  I'm sure the I-Cubs will have trouble replacing him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 14, 2011, 10:42:29 pm
Has anyone noticed that Iowa has done worse since several of their players are not on the Cubs, and they have had several Cub major leaguers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 01:27:37 am
Je Baez: 2-4, SB, K, Assist  (home)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_14_drorok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2011, 09:05:18 am
The Peoria Chiefs have come up with a promotion that is lacking in substance.

Intentionally so.

The Cubs’ Midwest League affiliate will hold a Le-
Bron James 2011 NBA Championship Replica Ring Giveaway for fans at the game Thursday.


In that the rings are nonexistent, the Chiefs are going for intangibles rather than anything tangible.

“We’re  going to put up a table in the front that says, ‘LeBron James’ Trophy Case,’ ’’ Chiefs media manager Nathan Baliva told Quick Hits on Tuesday. ‘‘We’ll have a little spot where the ring will be, a spot where the Finals MVP would be and then pretend like we’re David Stern the first night of the next season when he gives out the rings. When our fans come in, we’ll say, ‘Here you go. Here’s your replica ring.’ And we’ll be handing them nothing.”

Will rings come in nonexistent boxes, as well? ‘‘They will.’’

Quick Hits would be glad to run a photo of the nonexistent rings, but none exist.

The Chiefs also had hoped to take the fourth inning off to pay tribute to James taking the fourth quarter of every Finals game off.

‘‘If LeBron doesn’t need to show up in the fourth, maybe we won’t either,’’ Chiefs president Rocky Vonachen said.

‘‘We got rejected on that one unfortunately,’’ Baliva said. ‘‘I was told we got a laugh.’’
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2011, 02:47:56 pm
Thomas Diamond has been released.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2011, 03:06:30 pm
The Boise Hawks roster includes Kyler Burke listed as a pitcher.

http://www.ktvb.com/sports/Cubs-release-2011-Boise-Hawks-roster--123790239.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2011, 03:12:07 pm
Ty'Relle Harris has gone from Iowa back down to Tennessee.  Probably related to Tyler Colvin returning to Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 03:23:07 pm
Thanks for the link, Cactus.

Very interesting to see Ben Wells make his debut in that league rather than rookie ball.

About 8 intriguing players starting there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2011, 04:02:44 pm
 John Gaub continues to puzzle me.  It seems obvious that his walk rate is hurting his chances of being called up (and that has improved lately) but I'm now wondering if there also isn't something about his arm that is causing a lot of caution.  He hasn't pitched since Saturday and that is pretty routine for how he has been handled.

 W/ L   ERA    G GS   CG   SHO   SV    IP    H    R   ER   HR   BB   SO      
 2/1    3.67   25   0     0     0      1   27.0  20   11   11    4    19    43   
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 15, 2011, 04:17:38 pm
Golden, Darvill, Kim, Thomas, Wells, Reed.

Who are the other two, Chris?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 15, 2011, 04:21:47 pm
Any more signings reported?  The Cards just signed 27 picks yesterday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 04:23:26 pm
Who are the other two, Chris?


I'd add Cruz and the Cuban catcher Cabeza plus Hoilman though we probably won't be able to tell much from his stats at that level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 15, 2011, 04:27:26 pm
Golden appeared to struggle really badly at Mesa, according to ArizonaPhil.  I'm surprised they're bumping him to Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 15, 2011, 04:29:19 pm
According to ArizonaPhil, Cabeza was far and away the most valuable player in extended spring training.  He didn't go into any details, or give any stats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 15, 2011, 05:21:14 pm
I think this is the most interesting Boise roster in many years.  Not sure if it was Boise or Eugene or whatever, but wasn't there a rotation that had:  Angel Guzman, Dontrelle Willis, Aaron Krawiek, Todd Wellemeyer, and John Leicester?  All but Krawiec became major leaguers, Guzman became a stud prospect, Dontrelle became an actual stud performer, and as a high draft pick with a much touted arm Krawiec was perhaps viewed as the best of the bunch going into that season?  And then were Sisco and Ryu together there too, with Sergio Mitre or Nolasco or both?  Anyway, I suspect this is the most interesting since those glory days. 

Ben Wells, Willengton Cruz, Luis Liria, Jin-Yeong Kim, Austin Reed that's a good batch of starter/piggy-back prospects. 

Million-dollar Kim might be the 4th or 5th most interesting of the five, who knows. 

Kyler Burke and Charles Thomas are very good-armed conversion guys, I'm very interested in both. 

Rosario, Sanchez, Wang, Fitzgerald, it's not impossible that one or more of them might actually very good arms, too. 

I expect that Chen will be a very productive leadoff guy in CF.  I'm very interested. 

Golden has been horrific in Mesa, and may be on the Harvey/Mallory type hitting track (without their defense), but sometimes in box score games guys get a fresh start and things start to click.  So while I expect him to be shockingly bad for Boise, it wouldn't shock me if he actually turned out to be OK either. 

I'm cautiously optimistic about Cabezas.  Sometimes Phil likes a guy down there, and he gets to box-score games and he hits .205.  We'll see. 

I'm hopeful that Contreras will hit pretty well.   I'm kind of nervous that Darvill will be not so good, but he could change my mind. 

I expect that Hoilman and Klafczynski could be really good relative to the league, even if they don't end up that good in higher leagues. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 06:13:55 pm
Anyone else having a lot of problems lately getting on  Minorleaguebaseball.com?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2011, 06:35:58 pm
Anyone else having a lot of problems lately getting on  Minorleaguebaseball.com?
Yesterday, but not today.

Angel Guzman is done after two innings again

       
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Guzman, A (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t443&t=p_pbp&pid=425768) 2.02111002.25
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2011, 06:40:50 pm
Brad Snyder cleared waivers and has been assigned to Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 06:56:22 pm
Huh. I'm having all kinds of problems for about the third day in a row. Takes forever to get on the site, then can't get leagues or boxscores to show.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 07:00:04 pm
Jeffrey Baez moved to the 3rd spot in the order: 0-8, 3 K, SB in a DH

Sanchez:  1-3, BB, K
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 15, 2011, 07:12:08 pm
Craig, the primary starters for the 2002 Boise Hawks were Sisco (14 starts), Nolasco (15), Ryu (10), Luke Hagerty (10) and Carlos Vasquez (15). Rich Hill started five games, and Justin Jones one. Mitre wasn't at Boise in 2002.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 07:31:56 pm
Craig's thinking of the Guzman, Mitre, Nolasco, Willis group of 2000.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 07:32:28 pm
Peoria GM 1:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t443&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_15_wisafx_peoafx_1


Tenn rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 07:59:19 pm
Daytona completed early.

Rhee: 5-9-5-4-1-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_15_breafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 09:03:51 pm
Candelario: 2-5, 2 RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_15_dmerok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2011, 10:00:05 pm
Szczur: 1-2, 3B, BB

Greathouse: 53 BB in 57-2/3 IP overall

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t443&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_15_wisafx_peoafx_2

Grand slam, 3 BB's for Scales

Gaub: 1-1-1-1-0-1, HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_15_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 15, 2011, 11:15:02 pm
Any more signings reported?  The Cards just signed 27 picks yesterday.

Seriously?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 15, 2011, 11:42:24 pm
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseball/professional/article_b2be4a5d-999f-51f8-a345-6beda678081a.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2011, 01:31:08 am
Quote
Limited by a hamstring injury, Golden played just four games in rookie ball last year. He hit .333, but struck out seven times in 15 at-bats.

This year, he has worked on developing a better approach at the plate, more consistency in his swing and taking better routes on fly balls in the outfield.

“This year, I’ve learned more than twice as much as I had in my whole life,” Golden said. “I’m starting to feel myself when I do bad, when I do wrong. In high school, I really didn’t have an approach.”


http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/06/16/1690851/hawks-raw-prospect-seeks-return.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 16, 2011, 02:14:53 am
Reading the Reggie Golden quotes, somehow the phrase "dumb as a sackful of hammers" comes to mind.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 16, 2011, 09:10:49 am
This may be a little more complete than what was posted yesterday

Short Season-A - Boise Hawks (0-0)
 The Boise Hawks will begin their season on Friday, June 17 at Eugene. The Hawks have their home opener Wednesday, June 22 against Tri-City.


Here is the opening roster for Boise:


PITCHERS
 Kyler Burke
 Willengton Cruz
 Dustin Fitzgerald
 Jin-Young Kim
 Luis Liria
 Hector Mayora
 Austin Reed
 Santo Rodriguez
 Jose Rosario
 Yilver Sanchez
 Bryce Shafer
 Charles Thomas
 Yao-Lin Wang
 Ben Wells


CATCHERS
 Yaniel Cabezas
 Carlos Romero


INFIELDERS
 Vismeldy Bieneme
 Wilson Contreras
 Wes Darvill
 Dustin Harrington
 Paul Hoilman
 Brad Zapenas


OUTFIELDERS 
 Pin-Chieh Chen
 D. J. Fitzgerald
 Reggie Golden
 Ben Klafczynski


DISABLED LIST 
 Jose Guevara, C 
 Tarlandus Mitchell, P
 Jesus Morelli, OF
 Eric Rice, P 
 Jose Valdez, OF
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 16, 2011, 09:11:31 am
Rookie - AZL Cubs (0-0)
 The Arizona League begins play in Monday, June 20, as the Cubs face the Giants.
Here is the opening roster for the AZL Cubs:
PITCHERS
 Hunter Ackerman
 Rafael Diplan
 PJ Francescon
 Ramon Garcia
 Ryan Hartman
 Alvido Jimenez
 Pete Levitt
 Casey Lucchese
 Sheldon McDonald
 Jon Nagel
 Amaury Paulino
 Felix Pena
 Starling Peralta
 James Pugliese
 Colin Richardson
 Jean Sandoval
 Brian Smith
 Luis Villalba
 Joe Zeller
CATCHERS
 Johan DeJesus
 Brian Inoa
 Alberto Mineo
INFIELDERS
 Gioskar Amaya
 Travis Garcia
 Dustin Geiger
 Gregori Gonzalez
 Marco Hernandez
 Max Kwan
 Kenny Socorro
OUTFIELDERS
 Eduardo Gonzalez
 Dong-Yub Kim
 Blair Springfield
 Oliver Zapata
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 16, 2011, 09:13:33 am
Quote
****-Yub Kim

I'm curious to know what the missing name is, and would like to know why it was censored.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 16, 2011, 09:14:16 am
Quote from: Cactus
****-Yub Kim = D o n g-Yub Kim
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 16, 2011, 10:06:07 am
Hunter Ackerman pitching in Mesa is not a good sign.  He appeared to be quite a bit of a reach in Round 4 last year.  I don't know if there are injuries involved, but otherwise, if he's not good enough to make it to Boise at this point, that pick is still looking like a reach.  That might be a pick Wilken wishes he had back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 16, 2011, 11:48:11 am
I'm curious to know what the missing name is, and would like to know why it was censored.

The name is Do ng Yub Kim
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 16, 2011, 01:07:39 pm
Don ger, do you know where Grandpa's automobile is?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on June 16, 2011, 01:52:25 pm
Don g (clap clap).  Don g (clap clap).  Grandpas talking to you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 16, 2011, 01:59:02 pm
The name is Do ng Yub Kim

It translates into English: Dick Nixon
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 16, 2011, 02:19:44 pm
Smokies win the opener of a DH on a walkoff homer in the bottom of the eighth by Rebel Riding.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 16, 2011, 02:25:52 pm
Is that our poster?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2011, 04:17:52 pm
Smokies Gm 1:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t553&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_16_cngaax_tenaax_1


Nick Struck was terrific through five. Tennessee made 3 errors in the 6th to contribute to a collapse, one of them by Vitters who had just come into the game at 1st.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t553&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_16_cngaax_tenaax_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 16, 2011, 05:03:32 pm
Maybe those Smokies are ready for the majors!  Three errors, a HBP, and a wild pitch.  And the 3rd out finally came when one of the other guys got thrown out stealing.  Minor league baseball, you've gotta love it. 

Chattanooga Top of the 6th
Defensive Substitution: Josh Vitters replaces first baseman Steve Clevenger, batting 5th, playing first base.
Corey Smith reaches on throwing error by third baseman Junior Lake.
Kyle Russell singles on a line drive to right fielder Ryan Flaherty. Corey Smith to 3rd.
Scott Van Slyke hit by pitch. Kyle Russell to 2nd.
Jaime Pedroza reaches on force attempt, fielding error by first baseman Josh Vitters. Corey Smith scores. Kyle Russell to 3rd. Scott Van Slyke to 2nd.
Matt Wallach out on a sacrifice fly to right fielder Ryan Flaherty. Kyle Russell scores. Scott Van Slyke to 3rd.
Ivan Ochoa doubles (10) on a fly ball to right fielder Ryan Flaherty. Scott Van Slyke scores. Jaime Pedroza to 3rd.
Pitcher Change: Kyle Smit replaces Nicholas Struck, batting 4th.
Defensive Substitution: Nelson Perez replaces pitcher Nicholas Struck, batting 9th, playing left field.
Offensive Substitution: Pinch hitter Brian Cavazos-Galvez replaces Wilkin De La Rosa.
With Brian Cavazos-Galvez batting, wild pitch by Kyle Smit, Jaime Pedroza scores. Ivan Ochoa to 3rd.
Brian Cavazos-Galvez out on a sacrifice fly to right fielder Ryan Flaherty. Ivan Ochoa scores.
Alfredo Silverio reaches on fielding error by shortstop Marwin Gonzalez.
With Brad Coon batting, Alfredo Silverio caught stealing 2nd base, catcher Luis Flores to shortstop Marwin Gonzalez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 16, 2011, 07:18:08 pm
Don ger, do you know where Grandpa's automobile is?

You don't spell it, son, you eat it!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 16, 2011, 07:19:16 pm
They are not major league ready because they still win....They wrapped up the first half title with the win in the opening game...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 16, 2011, 08:26:13 pm
Lake, big lake!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2011, 09:24:54 pm
Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_16_wisafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Daytona:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_16_dbcafa_breafa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2011, 09:48:27 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_16_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2011, 11:04:38 pm
New Boise Hawks manager Mark Johnson mentioned some players to watch yesterday on IST as the season opener approaches tomorrow night in Eugene. The first is Reggie Golden, the Cubs’ second round draft pick last year out of Wetumpka, AL. Johnson says Golden has all the tools. “He’s just green—he’s a high school kid,” said Johnson. “He just needs to play. He’ll figure it out, and when he does, it’ll be fun to watch.” Johnson is also high on Wes Darvill, the Canadian infielder who played for the Hawks last season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2011, 01:16:18 am
Ben Wells to get the ball in Boise's opener.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2011, 01:19:22 am
Quote
DAYTONA BEACH -- Bethune-Cookman first baseman/designated hitter Ryan Durrence, who was not selected in the Major League Baseball Draft earlier this month, signed a free-agent deal with the Chicago Cubs on Thursday.

"I'm really excited for this opportunity," he said.

Durrence, a three-year starter at B-CU who leaves as one of the school's league leaders in doubles and home runs, headed to Arizona to check out the Cubs' spring training facility before going to Boise, Idaho.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2011, 03:31:47 am
Article on Kyler Burke's conversion to pitcher:

Rosario said Burke throws a 90- to 93-mph four-seam fastball, above average overhand curveball and is working on a changeup.

“For a left-hander that can have a nice, fluid delivery, that can give you 90 to 93 (mph fastball) and can create quality breaking balls, he can give you hope,” Rosario said. “We’re excited about him.


http://www.idahopress.com/sports/a-new-beginning-for-burke-in-boise/article_5d3f0e7a-98b0-11e0-a5ce-001cc4c002e0.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 17, 2011, 07:45:44 am
If that pitching thing doesn't work out, he can always convert to the outfield or something.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 17, 2011, 08:11:44 am
The Cubs have signed another Cuban defector, LHP Frank Del Valle.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/06/minor-league-transactions-june-8-14/ (http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/06/minor-league-transactions-june-8-14/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on June 17, 2011, 10:47:14 am
Maybe Kyler Burke can lead the league in hypothetical strikeouts this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 17, 2011, 10:53:34 am
Ouch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 17, 2011, 02:23:50 pm
ArizonaPhil

In addition, the Cubs have signed their fifth Cuban defector since December, adding LHP Frank del Valle to the organization. Del Valle pitched for the Cuban Junior National team about five years ago, and he joins catcher Yaniel Cabezas (Boise), OF Mayke Reyes (DSL Cubs #1), OF Rubi Silva (Daytona), and INF Rafael Valdes (Daytona) as the newest Cuban-Cubs. And the player considered to be the first Cuban defector (ex-DET OF Barbaro Garbey) is the hitting coach at Daytona. (Maybe it's time to bring back those 1990's Cubs road jerseys that Harry Caray thought displayed "Cuba" on the front).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 17, 2011, 02:29:12 pm
I wonder if there is a strategy in place to sign a bunch of Cuban players, even if many of them aren't very good, to try to make the Cubs the "default" destination for Cuban defectors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2011, 02:32:08 pm
Frankie Valle?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 17, 2011, 02:40:57 pm
If I read ArizonaPhil right, Lake is subject to the rule 4 draft this winter, and he does not expect him to be added to the 40 man roster.

Unusual to give up on a kid with that much talent, regardless of flaws.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 17, 2011, 02:49:40 pm
It's pretty hard to imagine Lake sticking on a major league team all season, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 17, 2011, 02:51:02 pm
If I read ArizonaPhil right, Lake is subject to the rule 4 draft this winter, and he does not expect him to be added to the 40 man roster.

Unusual to give up on a kid with that much talent, regardless of flaws.

Rule 5.  The Rule 4 draft is the June amateur ("first year player") draft.

There's essentially zero chance that Lake would be selected.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 17, 2011, 02:59:59 pm
I wonder if there is a strategy in place to sign a bunch of Cuban players, even if many of them aren't very good, to try to make the Cubs the "default" destination for Cuban defectors.

If they're going to do that, they should bring back the script "Cuba/Cubs" road jerseys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 17, 2011, 04:23:05 pm
I wonder if there is a strategy in place to sign a bunch of Cuban players, even if many of them aren't very good, to try to make the Cubs the "default" destination for Cuban defectors.

INtersting thought.  I think del Valle is a prospect, not like Smelly Borges at Peoria or the 27-year-old Daytona roster filler they signed recently.  Whether he's a $200K prospect or a $500K prospect, who knows. 

CaliforniaRaisin of nsbb had this Quote:
Quote
del Valle, 5-foot-10 and 165 pounds and born September 16, 1989, is a former member of the Cuban National Team. As a 15-16 year-old, he set the national season strikeout record and pitched a no-hitter. del Valle pitched in the 2006 “AAA" World Junior Baseball Championship and in the PanAmerican and pre-World Cup (IBAF AAA) competitions for 18-and-under players in 2007.


The following funny translation bit suggests that del Valle is a prospect, and has a picture. 
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.listindiario.com%2Fel-deporte%2F2011%2F3%2F17%2F181307%2FYankees-Cubs-y-Cardenales-invitan-4-prospectos-cubanos&act=url (http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.listindiario.com%2Fel-deporte%2F2011%2F3%2F17%2F181307%2FYankees-Cubs-y-Cardenales-invitan-4-prospectos-cubanos&act=url)


I have my doubts about the 5'10" 165 pounds bit.  That info may be somewhat dated or obsolete?  del Valle is the left guy in the following image of the Cuban prospects, and he looks taller and bulkier than any of them.  If he's 5'10" 165, they are a bunch of dinky guys.  My guess is that at present he's a lot heavier than 165, and probably taller, for whatever that is or isn't worth. 
http://images3.listindiario.com/image/article/263/460x390/0/581FD689-C0C1-4926-A487-97431E9532DB.jpeg (http://images3.listindiario.com/image/article/263/460x390/0/581FD689-C0C1-4926-A487-97431E9532DB.jpeg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 17, 2011, 04:30:19 pm
Jeff, one other note, I think it was after the 2009 season that Hendry/Fleita/Wilken added a Latin scout to the international scouting staff, somebody who was supposedly a fairly experienced big-name guy in the Latin scouting world.  Not to replace Serra in DR, but I recall reading that Cuba was going to fall under his domain, and I believe also Puerto Rico.  (I don't recall what else.)  So if they did invest in a high-profile scout with Cuba as a target, it would seem they are trying to be a presence there, and/or at least will give him some dollars to sign guys at least early in his Cubs career there. 

I assume adding him is a factor in why we spent a 6th round pick on Neftali Rosario, the stocky supposedly good-arm-good-pop-times catcher with power who's from Puerto Rico.  I suspect he was also a factor last year in spending a wasted $6 pick on Ivan DeJesus, the Puerto Rican outfielder who didn't sign. 

I think engaging with the Cuban talent is a good plan, since after years of it seeming to be so hard, now it seems that guys are getting out pretty easily. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 17, 2011, 06:13:43 pm
I wonder if there is a strategy in place to sign a bunch of Cuban players, even if many of them aren't very good, to try to make the Cubs the "default" destination for Cuban defectors.

I was wondering the same thing.... are ANY of these guys worth a flip?

Cuba is going to have to truly change leadership before long, and that will likely be used as an excuse for both nations to reconsider relations between the countries, something which would likely fairly quickly completely open Cuba up for MLB.  If the Cubs are in fact the default team for top Cuban talent at that time, it could end up being something of a coup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on June 17, 2011, 08:51:37 pm
I wonder if there is a strategy in place to sign a bunch of Cuban players, even if many of them aren't very good, to try to make the Cubs the "default" destination for Cuban defectors.

What makes you think that there has to be an ulterior motive in the Cubs signing players who aren't very good?  This isn't the JeffH that I know . . .
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 17, 2011, 09:03:27 pm
I must have missed something.  How did we come to the conclusion that many of them aren't very good.  Other than Smaily, they all seem to be reasonably well thought of.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2011, 09:25:13 pm
Jackson: 2-3, BB

Vitters: 2-4, HR, RBI, PO

Rhoderick: 2-2-0-0-0-4



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_17_cngaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Sanchez: 0-5, 3 K

Baez: 2-5, 2 RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_17_ddirok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 17, 2011, 09:29:16 pm
Hoilman begins his professional career with a walk.  Not a good way to earn a promotion in the Cubs system.

Cabeza begins his professional career with a double over the head of the outfielder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 17, 2011, 09:34:29 pm
Wells begins his career by retiring the side in order,, including a strikeout.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2011, 09:45:20 pm
Simpson: 4-2/3 -4-3-2-3-2, HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_17_peoafx_qcsafx_1


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 17, 2011, 10:03:57 pm
Boise Hawks take 4 straight walks.  All four are in danger of being released.

Especially Hoilman, who has walked twice.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 17, 2011, 10:08:59 pm
Now that Boise is playing, why don't the Cubs send Simpson down there where he belongs?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 17, 2011, 10:22:31 pm
I gotta tell you, I'm still not a Josh Vitters fan.

It's clear he can't field well enough to stick at third base and I don't think he'll hit enough to play first base or left field every day.

I'd like to see the Cubs trade him because I think that he has some value to someone.

I think he'll probably play in the Majors somewhere, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 17, 2011, 10:31:16 pm
According to the Boise announcer, Ben Wells has a fastball that cruises at 92 - 93 and tops out at 95.  But he has been using it as a set up pitch for his split finger, which is his strike out pitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 17, 2011, 10:36:06 pm
According to the Boise announcer, Ben Wells has a fastball that cruises at 92 - 93 and tops out at 95.  But he has been using it as a set up pitch for his split finger, which is his strike out pitch.

Very interesting. That sounds pretty promising, Dave.  He was a very young draftee, even for HS.  He'll still be only 18 all summer long. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 17, 2011, 10:42:16 pm
According to the Boise announcer, Ben Wells has a fastball that cruises at 92 - 93 and tops out at 95.  But he has been using it as a set up pitch for his split finger, which is his strike out pitch.

It sounds like he's pretty advanced as far as his approach but an 18 year-old throwing a splitter that often could be something to keep an eye on.

Some people believe that pitch leads to arm trouble.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 17, 2011, 10:44:05 pm
How likely is it that a Cub pitching prospect would have arm trouble?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2011, 11:05:32 pm
Colvin: 4-5, Cycle, 2 RBI

Castillo: 2-4, 2 HR, SF, 6 RBI

Jackson: 4 IP, 9 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_17_iowaaa_albaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 17, 2011, 11:08:48 pm
I gotta tell you, I'm still not a Josh Vitters fan.

It's clear he can't field well enough to stick at third base and I don't think he'll hit enough to play first base or left field every day.

I'd like to see the Cubs trade him because I think that he has some value to someone.  I think he'll probably play in the Majors somewhere, though.

You may be right, and it's hard to be a big fan.  But I think there might be two flaws in your thinking. 

1.  If he can't play 3rd for us and can't hit enough for 1B or LF for us, why would he be able to hit enough to play 1B or LF for somebody else, well enough to have meaningful trade value? 

2.  I'm not sure the thinking that he won't hit enough to play 1b or LF is valid.  Right now he's at .288 with a .787 OPS and 7 HR in AA. 

*Right now, only 5 teams in MLB have a LF OPS higher than .787! 
*14 teams have a 1B OPS higher than .787. 

Of course big-league pitchers are better than AA.  So he may not be able to match that in the majors.  But it's certainly fair that at 21, he might improve more sharply than will the remaining two levels of promotion.  We'll see.  The key will of course be playing half-way adequate defense somewhere, and hitting HR's. 

Right now he's got a 19K/7HR ratio.  When you have a HR/K ratio like that and hit >.250 when you do NOT put the ball into play, then any kind of ordinary BABIP will ensure a high average.  High average plus reasonable HR's and you're going to hit OK. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2011, 11:48:59 pm

Penalver: 2-3, 2 2B, RBI, BB, CS, E

Candelario: 1-3, 2B, SF, RBI, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_17_dchrok_dphrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 17, 2011, 11:58:24 pm
You may be right, and it's hard to be a big fan.  But I think there might be two flaws in your thinking. 

1.  If he can't play 3rd for us and can't hit enough for 1B or LF for us, why would he be able to hit enough to play 1B or LF for somebody else, well enough to have meaningful trade value? 

2.  I'm not sure the thinking that he won't hit enough to play 1b or LF is valid.  Right now he's at .288 with a .787 OPS and 7 HR in AA. 

*Right now, only 5 teams in MLB have a LF OPS higher than .787! 
*14 teams have a 1B OPS higher than .787. 

Of course big-league pitchers are better than AA.  So he may not be able to match that in the majors.  But it's certainly fair that at 21, he might improve more sharply than will the remaining two levels of promotion.  We'll see.  The key will of course be playing half-way adequate defense somewhere, and hitting HR's. 

Right now he's got a 19K/7HR ratio.  When you have a HR/K ratio like that and hit >.250 when you do NOT put the ball into play, then any kind of ordinary BABIP will ensure a high average.  High average plus reasonable HR's and you're going to hit OK. 

Well, A) I'm not a GM of any MLB team, so the Cubs don't have to trade Josh Vitters to me.  All they have to do is find one team that likes him well enough to give up something of value for him.

 Like I said, I'm sure that there is a place for Vitters somewhere.  He's clearly got some physical tools that scouts like a lot -- a quick bat, some moderate power (and debatable power potential), contact ability and fairly good low-K skills.  There are plenty of scouts that salivate over players like that, despite when those tools come on a guy that doesn't walk or has defensive limitations.

The Diamondbacks have decided they want guys that put the bat on the baseball.  Maybe the Cubs could explore something with Arizona.

I was simply "thinking out loud" because I don't see a future for Vitters with the Cubs.

If the insanity of Tom Rickets is to be believed and he's planning on keeping Jim Hendry, the Cubs will certainly attempt to (*Jes alert*) "compete" again in 2012.  That means they'll sign or trade for a first baseman (two big names are available), starting pitcher and at least one other hitter.

Vitters would probably be a chip in one of those moves.

2.) Major League pitchers are far better than AA pitchers and guys that swing at everything, don't walk and aren't named Vlad Guerrero don't typically have a whole lot of success right away.  Plus, the Cubs already have someone stinking up left field for the next few years.

I really wish Vitters was a better player but I think his ceiling is probably someone that is "just a guy."

I think he'll ultimately end up having a career along the lines of a Jeff King or a Brian Hunter or Kevin Young -- a useful guy that might have a really good year here or there but usually isn't anything special.

And someone like that isn't what you expect from a third pick, regardless of their recent lack of success going back to Troy Glaus.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 18, 2011, 12:03:41 am
True.  I got the feeling that most of his pitches were fastballs, but announcers, especially minor league announcers, are not very specific in their calling of the games.

I was quite surprised that they let him go 5 innings.  Not because he was getting into trouble, but because the Cubs don't usually let their young pitchers rack up large pitch counts.

By the way, the Boise team seems to be grooming themselves for the Cubs.  Gave up a lot of walks.  Swung early on many pitch counts.  When they did get 5 walks in a row, it was on about 18 balls in a row.  I got the feeling that even Shawon Dunston wouldn't have swung at them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 18, 2011, 12:45:04 am
Wells: 5-5-2-2-2-4 , 7-2 GO/FO

Golden: 1-3, RBI, BB, 2 K

Cabeza: 1-3, 2B, RBI, BB, K, E, PB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_17_boiasx_eugasx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 18, 2011, 09:13:00 am
Quote from: Chris27

 Colvin: 4-5, Cycle, 2 RBI

A scoring change took away his single.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 18, 2011, 09:22:40 am
Wow.  Even away from the parent club, the guys are coming to life.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 18, 2011, 11:24:25 am
I was simply "thinking out loud" because I don't see a future for Vitters with the Cubs....  I really wish Vitters was a better player but I think his ceiling is probably someone that is "just a guy."

While that may be right, that he ends up being no more than "just a guy," or perhaps nothing more than "just a guy who never even made the majors," it is important to remember that he is only 21.

I wonder what the attitude toward Vitters would be if the Cubs had drafted him last year, after two years in a junior college program, had signed him late in the summer and started him this season with the Smokies and his line was .288/.324/.462/.787 with 7 HR after 225 plate appearances as a 21 year old.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 18, 2011, 11:51:48 am
Have you not familiar with the posters on this board?

They would merely be complaining that he only has a AAAA bat, and he is going to get injured soon anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 18, 2011, 11:54:21 am
Have you not familiar with the posters on this board?

They would merely be complaining that he only has a AAAA bat, and he is going to get injured soon anyway.

Translator needed.  Aisle 3.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 18, 2011, 12:05:17 pm
Are you not familiar with the posters on this board?

They would merely be complaining that he only has a AAAA bat, and he is going to get injured soon anyway.

Amazing what the spell check doesn't catch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 18, 2011, 12:18:45 pm
Oh, I see.  It was in Dutch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 18, 2011, 12:20:52 pm
I should have known better than to use the Holy Language.

Only Craig understands it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 18, 2011, 12:24:11 pm
Craig understands kobal and Martian too, so what?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 18, 2011, 12:42:25 pm
Smokies pitcher Ty'relle Harris hit by drunk driver and is in serious condition.  Injuries are not life-threatening.

http://gamutnews.com/20110617/28710/video-smokies-pitcher-and-former-vol-tyrelle-harris-hit-by-car.html (http://gamutnews.com/20110617/28710/video-smokies-pitcher-and-former-vol-tyrelle-harris-hit-by-car.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 18, 2011, 01:47:58 pm
Damb Hendry.  When he traded for him, he should have known that a drunk driver would hit him.

Fire Hendry.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 18, 2011, 02:32:49 pm
Gonna try to head out and watch Beeler start for the Smokies tonight but lots of rain and storms have already happened and more are expected....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 18, 2011, 03:01:59 pm
...I'm sure that there is a place for Vitters somewhere. .... I don't see a future for Vitters with the Cubs....  If the insanity of Tom Rickets is to be believed.., the Cubs will certainly attempt to .."compete" again in 2012.  That means they'll sign or trade for a first baseman.... guys that swing at everything, don't walk and aren't named Vlad Guerrero don't typically have a whole lot of success right away.    Plus, the Cubs already have someone stinking up left field for the next few years.

Those are good points.  Even if there's a chance that Vitters will end up reasonably useful, he's not going to help right away.  It's pretty unlikely that he's going to help the Cubs win over the next several years.  I'm playing the role of Vitters apologist, but I think he's definitely a long-term futures guy, not a guy who's close to helping much anytime soon.  If you want significant help soon, Vitters isn't the guy. 

He might hit 25 HR's a year someday, but it's going to be soon.  He might play an almost sub-average LF someday, but it's not going to be soon.  (Which is why I wish they'd get him out there.)  So I think he's a several-years-out projection guy.  If that's too long to wait, then trading would make sense. 

....
I really wish Vitters was a better player but I think his ceiling is probably someone that is "just a guy."  I think he'll ultimately end up having a career along the lines of a Jeff King or a Brian Hunter or Kevin Young -- a useful guy that might have a really good year here or there but usually isn't anything special.  And someone like that isn't what you expect from a third pick, regardless of their recent lack of success going back to Troy Glaus.

I understand, and whatever the history may be with #3 picks, when you pick that high you think the chance should be there to get a very good player. 

But I don't think deciding what to do with Vitters should be influenced by where he was drafted or what we hoped for when he was drafted. 

We don't know how he'll progress.  But it seems to me that when a guy is 21, is OPSing at .787, and has a HR/K of 7/19, then he's got a chance to improve enough so that he might be able to OPS like that at the major-league level.  And he's got a chance to OPS at significantly better clip than that at the big-league level. 

A .780-.850 OPS guy might seem like "just a guy".  But given that there are only 14 teams that produce above .785 at 1B, and only 5 teams that produce above .785 in LF, I think we may be undervaluing a .785-type hitter, or undervaluing "just a guy". 

If he can become a .785 big-leaguer, that may not be as special as we hoped for, but it could be an asset bat. 

Certainly I don't know that he'll be able to OPS at .785 in the majors, or even close.  But neither do we know yet that he won't be able to OPS significantly better than that.  I think at this point, that there is at least a possibility that he could eventually end up better than a .785 guy.  That possibility is significant, I think, and I think it's possible that he could settle out significantly above .785.  It's not uncommon for HR production to improve beyond age 21.  So I'm still cautiously hopeful that he might blossom into a 25-HR hitter eventually.  And given his contact gift, I think if he could be hitting 25 HR's he'd be up near .300 for batting average, since those HR's would be hits. 

A .280-25HR guy who's a butcher defensively and takes no walks might not be the "special" that we hoped for at draft.  But I think it probably makes the best sense to just hold on, and hope he blossoms into a .300-30 HR. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 18, 2011, 03:02:52 pm
Gonna try to head out and watch Beeler start for the Smokies tonight but lots of rain and storms have already happened and more are expected....

Hope the weather holds for you, cwells, and I look forward to a good report!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 18, 2011, 03:29:25 pm
Hope the weather holds for you, cwells, and I look forward to a good report!

Seconded.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 18, 2011, 04:52:07 pm
I think they might get the game in, but I decided to set this one out with the forecast being so iffy and the moron Myron Noodleman who I can't stand being there tonight ;D.....Will head out tomorrow to watch Robert Coello pitch tomorrow afternoon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 18, 2011, 04:52:42 pm
C'mon, cwells, take one for the team, man!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 18, 2011, 04:58:02 pm
I would rather risk being hit by lightning at the same moment a tornado whisks me away than watch Robert Coello pitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 18, 2011, 05:02:27 pm
Between Iowa and Chicago this year, Tyler Colvin has twenty-five hits.  Sixteen of them have gone for extra bases.  That's 64%.  Insanity.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on June 18, 2011, 05:06:28 pm
C'mon, cwells, take one for the team, man!

I already am....I'm watching the game on Fox ha
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 18, 2011, 05:42:28 pm
Justin Bour won the Florida State League HR Derby, according to a poster at NSBB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 18, 2011, 09:17:48 pm
Szczur: 1-4, HR, RBI

Kirk: 5 IP, 6 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_18_peoafx_qcsafx_1



Beeler: 6-8-4-4-0-8, 2 HR

Jackson: 1-4, 3 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_18_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 18, 2011, 09:19:16 pm
FSL all-star game:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_18_fswafa_fseafa_1

Surprisingly, the Cubs pitchers were the only ones from the North to give up runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 18, 2011, 09:56:32 pm
Boise announcer says that Hoilman is a rather good fielding first baseman.  Boise manager has had him working out at third base, but does not intend to use him there in a game at any time soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 18, 2011, 10:32:09 pm
It would sure be nice to hear of a rash of signings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 18, 2011, 11:42:27 pm
I think that is a herd of signings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 18, 2011, 11:43:08 pm
P2 must be missing, so I will take his place.

Heard of signings?  Of course I have heard of signings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 18, 2011, 11:43:41 pm
The only chance of having an intelligent conversation here, is to take both sides.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2011, 12:15:03 am
Golden: 2-4, RBI, BB, K, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_18_boiasx_eugasx_1


Castillo: 3-5, 2B, HR, 4 RBI, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_18_iowaaa_albaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2011, 03:31:44 am
Quote
Matt Szczur, Peoria outfielder

Life has presented Matt Szczur with a multitude of choices.

A fifth-round selection of the Chicago Cubs in the 2010 draft, Szczur had to choose whether to pursue a career in professional baseball or football.

But before opting for either, he chose to help save the life of a 15-month old child.

Szczur missed a month of his final season of baseball at Villanova to donate bone marrow to a young girl who was battling leukemia.

"There isn't a day that goes by that I don't think about her and hope that she is doing well," said Szczur, who has never met the young child or even been told where she was from. "To help in that situation was the easiest choice I've ever had to make. Missing a couple of weeks of baseball to help save a life, it was a no brainer."

Szczur had signed up to be a bone marrow donor along with several teammates on the football team at Villanova, where coach Andy Talley has encouraged his student-athletes to participate in the Be the Match program for more than two decades.

There was a 1-in-80,000 chance that Szczur would be picked as a match for someone in need of bone marrow, and he was informed that he was a match for a youngster in need while Villanova was in the midst of its run to the 2009 NCAA Football Championship Subdivision national title.

Szczur, a wide receiver who also saw action as a running back, quarterback and return man as a junior on that team, went on to rush for 159 yards and record 270 all-purpose yards in the national championship game.

He took a long list of medications in the week leading up to a 3-hour operation where blood was taken from one arm, stem cells were filtered and the blood was returned to his other arm.

Szczur received twice-daily injections from one arm to the other for five days to replenish his white-blood cell count through his own stem cells.

Within a month, Szczur returned to the baseball field for Villanova and after batting .443 as a junior, the Cubs offered him a chance to play professionally. He saw action last summer for three Cubs affiliates, playing six games in Peoria before returning to Villanova for his final year of football.

The 2009 Colonial Athletic Association offensive and special teams player of the year was invited to play in the Senior Bowl before a meeting with Cubs general manager Jim Hendry convinced him to stay with baseball and forego any NFL dreams.

"It was the right call," said Szczur, now hitting .325 for the Chiefs. "Every day I look forward to coming to work, and making the all-star team, it tells me that I'm making progress. My objective as a professional is to be the best I can be, and this tells me that while I have a lot of work to do, I am taking steps in the right direction."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 19, 2011, 05:08:37 am
Get rid of him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 19, 2011, 07:33:46 am
 
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Bibens-Dirkx (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=502212) (L, 3-4)1.0 911111208.24
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 19, 2011, 07:45:35 am
Nice pitching for Yang and Thomas yesterday, encouraging.  He's supposed to have monster velocity at times, but I've assumed he'd be really wild, probably inconsistent, and probably very straight.  So a perfect 3K/0walks debut looks encouraging. 

Wang is 20, gave up quite a few hits last year, but was 2.12 at Mesa with 19K/6BB in small-sample 17 innings.  I seem to recall him being somewhat inconsistent; some nice lines, one or two poor ones.  I seem to recall Az Phil saying that he has a good arm, although I'm sure it's nothing great, and he's not very tall or long-levered.  But interesting start for him. 

Anyway, two nice starts in a row from two potentially promising pitchers in Wells and Wang, fun to start with.  I wonder who'll be next. 

Nice to see Golden and Darvill each with hits and walks, and Chen.

Three nice pitching starts in the three DSL victories.  Santana has been interesting, he's effective every time, but zero K's yesterday, he's had only one start where he had good K's.  I'm wondering/hoping he might be something along the Zambrano/Guzman trajectory (obviously not that good, but...).  A guy who has a good arm, but at the beginning it's mostly fastball.  And during a bunch of years of development he'll try to work up the breaking ball.  But starting with a good fastball that you can throw for strikes, that's a pretty good place to start. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 19, 2011, 12:01:19 pm
Ceasar has been projected to have some power, but so have several other prospects that ultimately never showed it.  But with 5 home runs in the first half of the season, at least he is showing more power than the Bacons and Campanas we have had in the past.  Perhaps a little more will come as he progresses.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 19, 2011, 12:05:08 pm
"The Beast" Hoilman is having quite a start.  In nine plate appearances, he has 4 walks, 3 strike outs, one fly out and one sacrifice fly.

How does that project over a 600 at bat season?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 19, 2011, 03:35:34 pm
That's 120 RBI, and more than 400 walks.... but to get 600 ABs when he is walking more than 40% of the time, it would have to be a long season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 19, 2011, 04:59:21 pm
I said at bats, but I meant plate appearances.  Should come out the same.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 19, 2011, 05:01:39 pm
Yeah, fly balls and sacrifice flies, they'll come out the same, too.  Sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2011, 05:41:06 pm
Szczur: 2-4, SB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_19_peoafx_qcsafx_1


Kim: 4-4-4-3-3-0

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_19_boiasx_eugasx_1



Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2011, 07:26:27 pm
Jackson: 2-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, K

Flaherty: 3-5, HR, RBI, 2 K

Dolis: (BS) , 2/3 -5-5-5-0-0, HR


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_19_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 19, 2011, 07:39:31 pm
I'm glad they aren't promoting Flaherty.  It's clear that he needs more time in AA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2011, 10:34:54 pm
LeHair's OPS closing in on 1,200.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_06_19_iowaaa_albaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 19, 2011, 10:54:23 pm
I'm glad they aren't promoting Flaherty.  It's clear that he needs more time in AA.

Flaherty is three years older than Vitters, and it appears you think Flaherty has a future, or would have a nice future if the Cubs promoted him, and two days ago you said you though Vitters would never be anything more than "just a guy."  Flaherty does have an OPS of about .950, compared to Vitters' OPS of about .790 (before today's game for both of them).  But when Flaherty was the same age as Vitters, he was putting up an .880 OPS in Boise.  I'm pretty confident that Vitters would do better than that at Boise right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 20, 2011, 01:31:50 pm
Castillo is sitting for 2nd straight day.  Is he hurt?  would be an unfortunate time for him, since he was so red-hot. 

He's only been in 29 games for Iowa, but is hitting .333 with 9 HR's and OPS over 1.000. I think if he could sustain a 9 HR/29 game pace, he'd start a lot of big-league games....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Pistol on June 20, 2011, 01:37:54 pm
I think if he could sustain a 9 HR/29 game pace, he'd start a lot of big-league games....

I think if he could sustain that, he'd be starting a lot of All-Star games...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 20, 2011, 01:43:31 pm
Castillo is sitting for 2nd straight day.  Is he hurt?  would be an unfortunate time for him, since he was so red-hot. 

He's only been in 29 games for Iowa, but is hitting .333 with 9 HR's and OPS over 1.000. I think if he could sustain a 9 HR/29 game pace, he'd start a lot of big-league games....

Des Moines Register:

Welington Castillo, who has a 15-game hitting streak, had the night off. The teams finish their four-game series today at noon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 20, 2011, 02:51:11 pm
A prospect I liked at one time (JR, you can confirm, yes?), Alberto Albuquerque, has 40 K's in 24 innings for Detroit.  He just turned 25. 

He was the prospect we traded for Jeff Baker. 

Josh Harrison, the infielder included in the Gorzellany trade, has cooled off and is now hitting only .286 for Pittsburgh, and a rather empty .286.  (2 doubles, 1 walk, and 3 K's in 51 AB, for a .627 OPS). 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 20, 2011, 02:55:51 pm
It's Alberto Alburqueque, a little different from the city in New Mexico.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 20, 2011, 06:42:22 pm
Angel Guzman goes from Peoria to Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2011, 07:18:10 pm
I can not get into milb.com in any form or fashion. I've tried everything.

It can't just be me....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 20, 2011, 07:21:03 pm
I can not get into milb.com in any form or fashion. I've tried everything.

It can't just be me....
I-Cubs lost to the Isotopes 4-3.

Story
http://iowa.cubs.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110620&content_id=20770740&vkey=news_t451&fext=.jsp&sid=t451 (http://iowa.cubs.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110620&content_id=20770740&vkey=news_t451&fext=.jsp&sid=t451)

Box
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t451&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_20_iowaaa_albaaa_1 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t451&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_20_iowaaa_albaaa_1)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 20, 2011, 07:40:00 pm
I can not get into milb.com in any form or fashion. I've tried everything.

It can't just be me....

I'm not having any trouble navigating milb.com at all.

Have you contacted tech support?

Maybe they've soured on your posting of box scores over the years and are hip to your game, mister.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2011, 08:21:34 pm
I don't get it. This has been going on for a week. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 20, 2011, 08:41:38 pm
Chris, try dumping all your cookies.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2011, 08:44:46 pm
You think dumping all of them would work?

A short time ago I deleted the one to MiLB.com and then went there again to no avail.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on June 20, 2011, 08:48:08 pm
What's happening when you go to the site?  What browser are you using?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 20, 2011, 09:08:45 pm
I don't know, Chris, but often if I reboot or dump cookies things work.  I have the problem with eBay now and then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 20, 2011, 09:19:44 pm
And by eBay, he means p0rn sites.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2011, 09:35:10 pm
mO, I'm using Firefox, and all I get is a white screen. Completely blank.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2011, 09:40:26 pm
Rosscup: 3-3-1-1-4-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t450&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_20_dbcafa_lakafa_1


Smokies and Chiefs off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 20, 2011, 09:42:26 pm
mO, I'm using Firefox, and all I get is a white screen. Completely blank.

You might want to check your AdBlock settings to see if you accidentally blocked milb.com cookies.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on June 20, 2011, 09:56:22 pm
27, do you get the same thing if you go to mlb.com?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 20, 2011, 09:58:37 pm
Do you have a hammer to wham it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 20, 2011, 10:25:40 pm
Don't tell him that.  What if he uses the wrong hammer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2011, 10:48:38 pm
Strikezone, doesn't seem that Adblock is a factor.

mO, I'm not having any problem getting on the Majors' site.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2011, 11:51:01 pm
Penalver: 3-4, 2B, 2 RBI, 2 BB, E

Candelario: 1-6, 3 RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_20_dchrok_drgrok_1


Geiger: 2-5, 2B, 3B, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_20_giarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2011, 12:04:56 am
Hoilman finally got a hit, and naturally, it was a home run.  That brings his BA to almost .090.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2011, 12:05:58 am
Cruz: 4-4-1-1-0-7

Golden: 2-4, 3B, K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t480&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_20_boiasx_eugasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 21, 2011, 06:42:26 am
Wilken's been talking up Wes Darvill really ever since we've drafted him, but yet in his third pro season, he's still hitting 9th for Boise. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 21, 2011, 07:25:28 am
Darvill, Golden, Chen, and Contreras are the four teenagers in the regular lineup thus far.  I noted that too, the manager had mentioned Darvill and Golden as the two most interesting players to watch out for, but they are the 8-9 guys in the lineup.  Darvill and Golden are within maybe a month in age? 

Heh, we sometimes think that it's big-league managers who have the affinity for vets.  But that is often well established as minor-league managers.  Not sure it matters much. 

Nice debut for Pugliese.  4 K's in two perfect innings. 

Nice to see Wellington Cruz with a good start.  He's 20 already.  But his improvement last year was sharp, went from 6.10 eRA to 1.90, went from 43BB/31K to 32BB/59K.  Hard to hit last year (25 hits in 52 innings).  Az Phil had noted that his stuff stood out from the other Latin arms in an early appearance.  So we'll see how the control holds up over the summer.  But nice to see one favorable high K/BB game. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2011, 11:51:51 am
ArizonaPhil

The pitching highlight for the AZL Cubs was probably Cubs 2011 18th round draft pick James Pugliese (Mercer CC), who was making his pro debut. And the 18 year old 6'3 Pugliese had an eye-popping intro to pro ball, too, throwing two innings (30 pitches - 20 strikes), and allowing no runs, hits, or walks, while striking out four. Pugliese throws with a max effort overhand style similar to Diamondbacks rookie RHP Josh Collmenter, pumping his fastball up into the 92-93 MPH range, with an OK breaking ball to complement it.

3B Garrett Buechele (SF 2011 14th round draft pick - U. of Oklahoma and the son of ex-Cub 3B Steve Buechele) made his pro debut for the AZL Giants, getting two hits, including a double.

I wondered if he was Steve Buechele's son.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 21, 2011, 01:59:16 pm
Now that we are approaching the midway point of the season, or are past it in some cases, who are the prospects we would like to see promoted?

The two I can think of right now are Justin Bour and Ryan Flaherty.

Maybe the Cubs are waiting for Darwin Barney's return from the DL and DJ LeMahieu's return to AA before promoting Flaherty but what is the reason for leaving Bour in Daytona?

Is it the overwhelming depth the organization has at first base?  Could it be that Josh Vitters is going to play first base only from here on out at AA?

If the latter is the case, do they use the DH in the Southern League so they could at least split the ABs?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2011, 02:14:34 pm
I suspect that Bour has not been promoted yet because this is the first really successful season for him, and they would rather he establish himself as a dominant player in his current league for most of the season. 

I'm not sure where we would want Flaherty to be promoted to.  He is holding his own in AA, but he is hardly tearing it up.  I certainly would not want him promoted to the ML until at least September, and there seems little reason to promote him to Iowa.  The Cubs, along with many other teams, usually use AA as the jumping off point for prospects.

I am sorry that they promoted Silva too soon.  In my opinion, he should have played most of the season in Peoria.

I admit that I am biased by my belief that it is better to promote position players too slowly than it is to promote them too quickly.  And especially it is a bad idea to bring high prospect up to the ML just to play a couple of times a week.

The only move I would recommend would be to release Hill and bring up Clevenger.  But it will never happen this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 21, 2011, 02:15:35 pm

Maybe the Cubs are waiting for Darwin Barney's return from the DL and DJ LeMahieu's return to AA before promoting Flaherty but what is the reason for leaving Bour in Daytona?


When LeMahieu was called up, the story was that LeMahieu was about to be promoted to AAA (see link below), so I assume that he'll go to AAA when Barney comes off the DL.  As to Bour, he's been slumpi ng lately.  Not sure about promoting him soon. 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0531-cubs-brite--20110530,0,2231576.story?track=rss
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 21, 2011, 02:16:11 pm
If he can continue to cut down on his excessive walk total, I'd like to see John Gaub get a shot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 21, 2011, 02:45:22 pm
I'm not sure where we would want Flaherty to be promoted to.  He is holding his own in AA, but he is hardly tearing it up.

Flaherty is hitting .306/.381/.568/.948 at AA in what is generally regarded as a pitchers' league.

I disagree with the characterization that "he is hardly tearing it up."

I'd say he is doing a damn good job of tearing it up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 21, 2011, 03:15:19 pm
Clevenger, yes, obviously.  And, for God's sake, bring Jeff Beliveau up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 21, 2011, 03:16:36 pm
Flaherty is 3rd in the Southern League in OPS and RBIs and 4th in slugging % and homers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 21, 2011, 03:17:19 pm
Yes, we should have a few more underperformers like Ryan Flaherty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2011, 03:41:14 pm
Yes, we should have a few more underperformers like Ryan Flaherty.

At no time did I say that Flaherty was underperforming.  But his numbers in AA are about what I would expect from a decent prospect.  Hardly "tearing it up".

LeMehieu, with a 358 average perhaps could be said to be tearing it up.  But his BA is more than 100 points lower in the ML, and he is spending a lot of time on the bench.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 21, 2011, 03:49:22 pm
I'm not sure where we would want Flaherty to be promoted to.  He is holding his own in AA, but he is hardly tearing it up.  I certainly would not want him promoted to the ML until at least September, and there seems little reason to promote him to Iowa.  The Cubs, along with many other teams, usually use AA as the jumping off point for prospects.

Not to dispute the idea that players can come directly from AA to the majors, but Flaherty has an OPS of roughly .950, 3rd in the league, and one of the two ahead of him is 28.  http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=l_bat&lid=111  The league average OPS is .737.  Flaherty has been a utility player in AA.

What would he have to do to be "tearing it up"?  League leader? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 21, 2011, 03:50:55 pm
Promote Szcuzr.  That would put him on a path for a September 2012 callup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 21, 2011, 05:29:49 pm
I'm glad that they didn't promote Bour.  When he was hot and was hitting .330 with a bunch of HR's and a low K rate, he was riding a high.  He's cooled off considerably.  Hitters have their ups and downs, and it's obvious now that he was riding a high, and now he's come down from that.  It's not that the pitchers are better or have adapted or anything like that, FSL pitchers the last few weeks probably aren't way better or smarter than they were three weeks ago.  it's just the natural ebb and flow that comes with hitting, and we see now that it's just about Bour losing his groove. 

But if we'd promoted him to AA, and then he performed the way he has recently at Daytona, we'd have been tempted to say, "Oh, it's the higher level.  He dominated A+, but he's a .220 (June) or .165 (last ten games) hitter in AA.  He's overmatched by AA pitching, it shows he's just an A-ball guy."  By letting him ride the ups and downs at Daytona, we see that it's just about Bour.

Which may mean he's not much of a prospect.  Or it may simply be that he's quite a good prospect, but like all power guys he has his swings.  And he needs to learn to lock into the good longer and stronger, and be able to figure out how to dig out of the downs quicker and before they get too deep. 

Some of the same with Flaherty.  He's hit 1 HR in his last 10 games, with a .316 OBP.  He was hot, now he's not so hot.  That's just the life of a hitter. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2011, 05:59:56 pm
I agree with everything you say, Craig, other than one thing.  The pitchers are not better or smarter than they were a few weeks ago, but I suspect that they are pitching Bour differently now, due to scouting reports that found a current weakness.  The minors (and the majors, if promoted too soon) are full of adjustments by the pitchers that require re-adjustments by the hitters.  If someone has trouble hitting high, inside pitches, the word spreads quickly, and he sees a lot more high inside pitches.  And will continue to see them until he proves he can hit them, at which time they look for other weaknesses.

I agree that there are highs and lows in every season for every batter.  But these lows often can be brought on or extended by pitchers that probe for and find weaknesses.  That is why I think it is best for a position player to excel in a particular league for most, if not all of a season, before being promoted to another level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2011, 06:00:46 pm
Thomas Diamond is no longer in the organization. He was signed by the Twins today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 21, 2011, 06:49:10 pm
That adjustment thing may well be true, Dave, and perhaps that's the reason for the swings.  But I think to a large degree is may also simply be the hitter himself.  A basketball shooter is hot one night, not the next.  Sometimes it's different defense, but often it's simply the shooter.  (At least that's how it is for me.  I can be shooting at the gym one night and be making everything, and everything is in balance.  I can be shooting at the same basket in the same gym a week later with nobody defending me at all, I'm just shooting around, and now I'm not making many at all and I'm not in sync.) 

Soriano has some hot spells, he has some cold spells.  It's not like after five years in the majors scouts hadn't ID'd his weaknesses. 

Hitters often talk about the ball looking really big and everything seeming slow when they're in the zone.  So I think there's just a totally hitter-based hot-and-cold, off-and-on randomness. 

But certainly there can be pitcher-induces factors, too.

Sometimes I suspect minor league hitters often knock themselves out of a groove.  I'm hot, I'm hitting the ball on the nose and seeing it well, everything is so in balance and going so well that I hit a couple of balls so on the nose and with such timing and balance that they go over the wall.  Suddenly I think hitting HR's isn't so hard, I should do that more often, and instead of flowing naturally out of my true stroke, I start swinging for HR's and suddenly my stroke isn't so balanced anymore.  I wouldn't be surprised at all if this happened to Bour to some degree. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2011, 07:16:33 pm
ArizonaPhil

Willengton Cruz throws a fastball in the low 90's but with lots of movement, and a sharp-breaking slurve(?). He has really nasty stuff. I can see him being an MLB LOOGY at the very least, but he also has the stamina to be a starter as he moves up through the system.

BTW, W. Cruz is a lanky kid, tall & thin, with loose arms, and he is what I would call a bit "effectively wild." I wouldn't want to hit against him, and I hit RH.

Starling Peralta also throws his fastball in the low 90's, but he has the potential to gain MPH as he matures (as does W. Cruz). He also has a promising breaking ball and change-up. He would project as a starter. Peralta's problem last night was that he actually threw too many strikes. He didn't really try and work the hitters like he will once he gains more experience.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 21, 2011, 07:18:19 pm
Nice, Dave, that sounds very encouraging.  Two to watch for sure. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2011, 08:06:09 pm
Rhee today went 6 innings, giving up 6 hits, no earned runs, walking and striking out 2.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 21, 2011, 08:06:57 pm
Rhee is a non-prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2011, 08:12:10 pm
I had no idea.  When did you make that declaration?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on June 21, 2011, 08:16:09 pm
 Reply #1416 on: Today at 08:06:57
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2011, 08:28:46 pm
Candelario: 2-5 , ( 1 BB last 37 AB's // 17 BB's first 27 AB's )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_21_dyarok_dchrok_1


Sanchez: 0-3, BB, 3 K, E  ; ( 5-34, 16 K's last 10 games )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_21_dcurok_dparok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2011, 08:37:51 pm
Daytona pen blew the game for Rhee:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_21_lakafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 21, 2011, 10:06:38 pm
Good to see the Cubs remove the base on balls from Candelario's offense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2011, 10:07:47 pm
Caridad has had an awful season:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_21_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1


MWL all-star game:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_21_mdeafx_mdwafx_1


I'd like to know how Archer made the SL all-star team:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_21_sosaax_sonaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2011, 12:20:24 am
Hoilman: 2-3, HR, 4 RBI, 2 BB


Burke: 1-2/3 -2-2-2-3-1 , WP

Thomas: 1-2/3 -0-0-0-4-2, HB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_21_boiasx_eugasx_1


Zapata: 0-1, 4 BB, 2 SB

Ackerman: 3-3-3-3-3-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_21_cubrok_athrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2011, 03:44:30 am
Boise highlights:

http://www.kboi2.com/sports/124335694.html?tab=video
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2011, 11:45:01 am
Dang.  Hoilman got a hit yesterday that wasn't a home run.  I was wondering what the Cubs would do with a guy that led the league in HRs and hit below 100.

Probably move him to the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2011, 05:29:05 pm
According to ArizonaPhil, last year the Cubs were negotiating with Kevin Rhoderick, and he rejected their last offer, telling them he would return to college.

On the last day, he called them and asked if their offer was still on the table.  It was so late, they almost were not able to get the contract done before the end of the day.

And now he is in Tennessee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2011, 08:39:20 pm
Ha: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, E

Bour: 2-3, 2B, 3 RBI, BB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_22_lakafa_dbcafa_1


Peoria and Tennessee off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2011, 09:08:41 pm
Hoilman has another lousy single today.  Some power hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2011, 09:12:29 pm
Wells has gone four innings with two hits and no runs.  No walks and 2 strike outs.  Announcer says he has thrown his fastballs and splitters for nothing but strikes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2011, 09:35:54 pm
Wells hit a wall in the fifth.  A hit, two walks, and he hit his pitch count.  Leaves after giving up one run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2011, 09:52:09 pm
Hoilman hits a two run double to right.  What the heck is a dead pull hitter hitting the ball to right?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2011, 10:54:54 pm
Hoilman: 2-3, 2B, 2 RBI, BB

Golden: 1-4, 2 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_22_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2011, 11:40:50 pm
Iowa GM 1:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_22_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1


Colvin: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_22_mrbaaa_iowaaa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 12:12:48 am
Brian Smith's pro debut went well for a while:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_22_diarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 01:31:36 am
Cam Greathouse demoted to Boise.

Kyung-Min Na also joins the Hawks as DJ Fitzgerald is released.

Vismeldy Bieneme to Mesa to rehab a ligament injury in his finger.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 01:36:09 am
Article on D-Cubs hitting coach Barbaro Garbey and his relationship with the Cuban prospects:

http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2011/06/21/defector-mentors-cuban-d-cubs.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 23, 2011, 12:30:07 pm
Interesting.  The Garbey factor might better explain why Silva got promoted so quickly even though he couldn't hit in Peoria.  He can't hit at Daytona either. I don't think the ability to hit fastballs, breaking balls, and to lay off of junk is a function of language or culture. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 23, 2011, 12:32:50 pm
That explains why they moved Silva to Daytona before he was ready.  I would still rather he was in Peoria.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 23, 2011, 01:06:27 pm
It seems that the goal is to put a player where he is most likely to learn and develop.  If that means pairing him with a coach in a league where the competition might over-match the player for a while, but the player is still most likely to learn and develop in that high level league, then he should be in the higher level league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 23, 2011, 02:29:26 pm
It seems that the goal is to put a player where he is most likely to learn and develop.

That is certainly the goal.  The Cubs just picked a terrible way to attempt to reach that goal, in my opinion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 23, 2011, 03:05:52 pm
It seems that the goal is to put a player where he is most likely to learn and develop.  If that means pairing him with a coach in a league where the competition might over-match the player for a while, but the player is still most likely to learn and develop in that high level league, then he should be in the higher level league.
But you can't trade all of your prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 23, 2011, 03:17:38 pm
lol
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 23, 2011, 04:53:35 pm
Matt Szczur has made the Futures game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 23, 2011, 05:07:03 pm
Any other Cubs?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 23, 2011, 05:36:42 pm
But you can't trade all of your prospects.

Good line.

Dave, if the guy is completely over-matched AND lacks the personality to deal with the kind of failure resulting from that, you are right.  But there are three factors at play: 1) The guy's psychological makeup; 2) His performance ability (he may actually already be able to perform there and his problems before the promotion may have been as much a result of depression and isolation as being over-matched); 3) The Cubs may actually be making a real effort to set themselves up as the team to sign with once Cuban players are able to freely come to the U.S. (something which should happen shortly when there is a real leadership change there).

But if the Cubs simply wanted to pair the prospect with the coach, perhaps they should have kept that in mind in assigning the coach, assigning the coach to the appropriate level for the prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 23, 2011, 06:05:52 pm
Any other Cubs?

Nope, he's the only one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 23, 2011, 06:05:54 pm
ROSTER MOVES:  The Cubs placed RH Austin Bibens-Dirkx on the bereavement list today.  His grandfather passed away last week and he returned home today to be with his family in Oregon for the services. RH Robert Coello returns to the I-Cubs today from double-A Tennessee. Coello began the season in the I-Cubs' rotation and was 3-5 with a 7.82 ERA in nine starts before getting designated for assignment on May 29. When he cleared waivers on June 2, he was reassigned to Tennessee.  In four starts with the Smokies, he was 1-2 with a 3.00 ERA.  Reliever Esmailin Caridad was reassigned to Tennessee today.  He is 3-2 with an 8.27 ERA and four saves in 26 appearances for the I-Cubs.  He allowed seven runs in two-thirds of an inning and got the loss in game one of this series against the Redbirds.  RH Justin Berg was activated from the disabled list today after pitching a simulated game on Tuesday.  Berg has been on the DL since May 29 with a sore right elbow.  Berg has had two stints with Chicago this year and had no record and a 3.75 ERA in eight appearances.  With Iowa this season, he is 2-0 with a 2.25 ERA and one save in seven games.  He is available out of the bullpen tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 06:06:55 pm
Any other Cubs?

Hak-Ju Lee
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on June 23, 2011, 07:17:45 pm
Ouch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 08:22:46 pm
Trey McNutt faced five batters tonight, walked 4 of them, got none of them out. 26 pitches, 8 strikes.

I've come to the conclusion that the Cubs don't have one good pitching prospect in the organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 23, 2011, 08:28:09 pm
Trey McNutt faced five batter tonight, walked 4 of them, got none of them out. 26 pitches, 8 strikes.

I've come to the conclusion that the Cubs don't have one good pitching prospect in the organization.

Ben Wells.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 08:38:58 pm
We're pinning our hopes on an 18-year-old, 7th-round pick?

Given time, I'm sure he'll look like crap eventually.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 08:51:54 pm
Bour: 0-3, BB, 2 K , ( 7 for last 37 )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_23_dbcafa_clrafa_1


Peoria off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 08:55:01 pm
Penalver: 3-4, SB, K

Candelario: 2-4, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_23_dchrok_dmerok_1


Batista: 1-4, HR, RBI, 3 K, E

Sanchez: 0-3, RBI, 2 K, 2 E , ( 4-37, 16 K last 11 games )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_23_drdrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 23, 2011, 09:29:36 pm
Trey McNutt faced five batters tonight, walked 4 of them, got none of them out. 26 pitches, 8 strikes.

I've come to the conclusion that the Cubs don't have one good pitching prospect in the organization.

Was this his first start following his rib injury?

If so, it could just be a really, really bad case of rust.

/brightside
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 10:01:56 pm
Colvin: 3-4, HR, 4 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_23_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1


Jackson: 1-3, BB, 2 K, CS

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_23_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 11:22:28 pm
Greathouse picks up where he left off in Peoria: 2/3 -1-2-2-3-0, HR, WP


Hoilman: 0-1, 3 BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_23_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2011, 11:55:14 pm
Mesa puts up 18....

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_23_cubrok_royrok_1



Hernandez: 3-5, 2 RBI, BB

Geiger: 2-4, 2B, 4 RBI

Hartman: 4-3-0-0-1-3



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 24, 2011, 12:27:02 am
We're pinning our hopes on an 18-year-old, 7th-round pick?

Given time, I'm sure he'll look like crap eventually.

And in Boise no less.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 24, 2011, 09:23:33 am
Quote from: Smokies radio

Birmingham would tack on two more runs later in the ballgame as Josh Phegley would hit a solo homer off of LHP Jeff Beliveau. In the bottom of the eighth inning Phegley would come in and score on a sacrifice fly by Greg Paiml off of none other than Matt Spencer. Spencer came in to pitch the ninth inning for the Smokies due to a lack of fresh pitching arms in Tennessee’s bullpen.
Actually, Spencer pitched the eighth as Birmingham did not bat in the ninth.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 24, 2011, 09:36:18 am
This was the Smokies first game after three days off for their All-Star break.  Strange that they would run out of pitching.

PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
McNutt (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=571939) (L, 1-3)0.0 1224003.19
Searle (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=545989) 3.0 4332503.60
Smit (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=502361) 2.0 2002306.16
Beliveau (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=542924) 2.0 2110211.21
Spencer (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=460671) 1.0 1112109.00
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 24, 2011, 04:51:03 pm
Interesting.  The Garbey factor might better explain why Silva got promoted so quickly even though he couldn't hit in Peoria.  He can't hit at Daytona either. I don't think the ability to hit fastballs, breaking balls, and to lay off of junk is a function of language or culture. 
Silva was sent back to Peoria today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on June 24, 2011, 04:52:15 pm
Good to see Tyler Colvin start hitting even though it's in Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 24, 2011, 04:58:00 pm
Good to see Tyler Colvin start hitting even though it's in Boise.

He's in Iowa, Jiggy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 24, 2011, 05:08:56 pm
Boise - Iowa - Welders don't know no damb geography.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on June 24, 2011, 05:28:35 pm
Idaho, Iowa...what's the damb difference?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 24, 2011, 06:53:12 pm
Idaho, Iowa...what's the damb difference?

The mountains in  Iowa are quite a bit lower.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 24, 2011, 07:04:31 pm
br is our #1 anti-Colvin poster and was quite concerned that Colvin couldn't continue being productive, primarily because he wasn't going to be able to slug .500+ because his home run rate was supposedly unsustainable.

Well, we all know that Colvin performed poorly and was returned to the minors.  Ironically, he has hit for a ton of power, but the rest of his game has collapsed.

Maybe he does have a skill set that would make him a top-20 HR hitter in MLB.  I hope Hendry and the rest of the front office dopes don't write him off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 24, 2011, 08:38:34 pm
Agreed Jeff.  I liked what I saw last year from him.  He isn't the first to struggle in year two.  Hopefully he can pull it together in time for Hendry to unload the veterans and give him a couple of months worth of  AB's.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2011, 09:09:56 pm
Kirk: 5-6-4-4-3-5, 2 HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_24_kccafx_peoafx_1

Daytona:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_24_dbcafa_clrafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 24, 2011, 09:33:13 pm
Hey, Chris, did you get your problem with milb.com worked out?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on June 24, 2011, 10:03:55 pm
Boise?

What was I thinking?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 24, 2011, 10:05:02 pm
You are only asking a question that at one time or another, we have all asked.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2011, 10:12:59 pm
Hey, Chris, did you get your problem with milb.com worked out?

Well, it's working again for the time being. I didn't do anything different though.

Which reminds me: thanks to those who offered advice on how to fix it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2011, 10:41:10 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 4 K

Vitters left after getting hit by a pitch.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_24_tenaax_biraax_1


Castillo: HR, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_24_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2011, 10:42:22 pm
In fact, Vitters was hit in the head:

http://photos.al.com/birmingham-news/2011/06/tennessee_barons_16.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2011, 11:04:45 pm

Hoilman: 3-4, 2 2B, 3 RBI, BB, K

Kim: 3-2/3 -5-0-0-1-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_24_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 24, 2011, 11:32:18 pm
Boise is the capital of Iowa.  40 miles south of Iowa Falls.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 24, 2011, 11:42:55 pm
Another lousy single by Hoilman.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 25, 2011, 11:40:20 am
Austin Reed and Kim flip-flopped, Kim started their first piggy-back, Reed this one.  Reed had a no-hitter going into the 4th before falling apart and allowing 6 runs, although Kim came in with two outs and 4 in and allowed a single and double to let in the 5th and 6th runs that got counted to Reed. 

IIRC, Reed was OK for a couple of innings in his first appearance too, but then fell apart in his final inning.  You'd think after a couple of months in Arizona that he should be stretched out enough to last four innings, but who knows.   As a real wild guy, I'm sure he racks up pretty high pitch/inning numbers, so who knows. 

19-year old Darvill got his OBP up to .429. 

Dave's guy Hoilman is up to .348, with a .556 OBP and a 1.295 OPS.  Fun with tiny sample sizes and the crazy numbers that aren't sustainable.  Fairly rare to have guys who have 9K's in 23AB hitting .300.  But while obviously it's high, it may not be all that crazy, given HR hits. 

His 9K/2HR ratio really isn't that bad, and of course when it's 9K/2HR/12 walks, it's beautiful. 

I usually figure that if a guy can have a K/HR ratio that's less than 5:1, you're going to have a pretty respectable batting average.  The real batting average is in between the BABIP and the batting average on AB's that are NOT in play, K's and HR's.  (BANIP?)  If the batting average on K's/HR's is not too far below .200, or is actually above .200, then the not-in-play AB's won't be so BA-bad.  The composite average, which factors both BABIP and BANIP,  won't be that terribly much lower than the BABIP. 

Hoilman's line is funny though:
23 AB total.
6-for-12 on balls in play.
2 HR's.
9K's.
12 walks.

Alex Santana went six innings for DSL1.  He's got a 1.20 ERA after 30 innings, and a WHIP below 0.9, 17 years old.  He's also got a flukishly low BABIP.  Only 21 hits allowed in 30 innings, with only 13 K's.  So that's like a .200 BABIP, that's not going to last.  But I think sometimes in DSL/Rookie type ball, a low BABIP may be more than just luck and may reflect pretty good stuff that weak hitters can touch but can't hit out of the infield. 
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=600970 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=600970)

Delbis Arcila, who will still be 18 when next season begins (April birthday), hit his 4th DSL HR within the last week.  Strikes out a fair amount (12K/67AB), but .582 slugging/.987 OPS.  I think he projects as a possibly good hitter, but probably a LF/1B type, not fast.  6'3" LH. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 25, 2011, 12:14:50 pm
But I think sometimes in DSL/Rookie type ball, a low BABIP may be more than just luck and may reflect pretty good stuff that weak hitters can touch but can't hit out of the infield.

Not to dispute the point, but why would you seem to believe that is the case in DSL/Rookie type ball, but not in the majors?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 25, 2011, 12:24:54 pm
Because statistically it's been demonstrated that while HITTERS have wide varience in BABIP, that *big-league* pitchers have very little sustainable varience in BABIP.  Good big-league pitchers and bad big-league pitchers, their BABIP-against doesn't vary much at all, and even when somebody has a year that lies outlies the normal range, their is no evidence that it is sustainable or consistent from year to year. 

K's made, walks allowed, HR's allowed, those are the three main variables for big-league pitcher.  But statistically BABIP against is not.  Obviously BA-against varies, but that is because if you allow extra HR it raises, and if you have more K's it reduces. 

That hitters have BABIP varience is because different hitters have very different styles and approaches.  But different NL pitchers are facing basically the same distribution of opposing hitters.  A hitter might always be a contact-stroke or a pull-for-the-fences stroke, but a pitcher faces all kinds. 

But in the lower and lowest minors, maybe it's the same.   But I'm guessing that perhaps there are types of fastballs that feeble DSL hitters can touch but can't drive, and thus result in lower BABIP.  But in the majors, there is no statistical indication that fastball guys or sinkerballers or guys with good fastball movement actually have lower BABIP-against. 


A fair chance that it's actually comparably true in the minors too, I think, and that Santana has just gotten lucky. Minor league infielders are much worse than in majors, so perhaps a lot of grounders turn into minor-league hits because minor-league infielders don't have the range or arms to handle non-easy ground balls and choppers etc? Plus often minor league hitters aren't as big and slow, so might be able to beat out more infield squibs and the like. 


In Santana's case, I don't expect it's "luck" that he isnt walking anybody, and isn't allowing any HR's, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2011, 10:12:51 pm
Daytona:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_25_dbcafa_clrafa_1

Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_25_albaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 25, 2011, 11:45:22 pm
Hoilman's 0 - 3 brought his batting average down to 308, but he also took 2 walks, to move his W/SO to 14/9.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2011, 11:55:52 pm
Golden: 1-4, 3B, BB, 2 K

Darvill: 3-3, 2B, RBI, BB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_25_spoasx_boiasx_1


Peralta: 4-3-0-0-0-6

Amaya: 2-4, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_25_clerok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 26, 2011, 12:04:05 am
De Valle starts his American career by retiring all six batters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2011, 12:06:13 am
Szczur: 0-5, 2 K , ( 4-25, 0 BB, last 6 games )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_25_kccafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2011, 12:26:45 am
Candelario: 2-2, SF, 2 RBI, BB

Arcila: 1-1, 3B, 4 RBI, 3 BB

Penalver: 2-4, 2B

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_25_dphrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2011, 12:36:26 am

Nelson Perez forced to pitch in the 14th; didn't work out too well.

Struck: 6-7-1-0-3-5

Beliveau: 2-0-0-0-0-2 , ( 32 K / 4 BB in 24-1/3 IP )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_25_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2011, 04:39:51 am
This is awfully close to the inverted "W" for Ben Wells, no?

(http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/idahopress.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/9/e5/9e5028d8-9fbb-11e0-aa97-001cc4c03286/4e06ce62798db.image.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 26, 2011, 07:49:59 am
Wells looks like a big guy, who could get fat, but for now at least it doesn't appear he's really worrisome fat. 

Szczur has indeed been icy.  I wonder if the HR deal hasn't necessarily helped him?  Seems to some degree since he's gone for the HR's, his walks and stolen bases have both slowed down. 

Larry Suarez has an 18-4 K/BB ratio for Peoria, and has done the minor-league trick of turning a couple of errors into a batch of not-responsible unearned runs. 

Nice to see DelValle pitching already, and doing well. I was disappointed to see his official listing as only 5'11", in the photo I'd thought he might be a taller, more hulking power pitcher prospect.  O well. 

And to see Peralta doing really well.  13K/1BB/8 innings looks nice, for a tall, projectible 20-year-old who had low walks in his DSL time. 

I'd been hoping that Cruz might be emerging as a really good prospect, but his second game not so good as his first. 

Wes Darvill's 3-3 bumps his average to .333, and his OBP to .500.  The fun of small samples.  It is interesting that 3 of his first 8 hits have been for extra bases.  Last year in 194 AB he had only 4 XBH all summer, and only 1 XBH in 130 AB as a first-year pro.  So 5 XBH in 324 pro AB entering this year.  He'll be 19 all season long, so maybe he is growing into at least token power, and may project to grow into real-prospect-caliber power eventually?  May as well hope, eh? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 26, 2011, 08:47:23 am
Szczur: 0-5, 2 K , ( 4-25, 0 BB, last 6 games )

Obviously time for a promotion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 26, 2011, 09:44:48 am
Esmailin Caridad and Jeff Stevens are now in Tennessee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 26, 2011, 10:00:17 am
Any corresponding promotions to Iowa?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 26, 2011, 10:07:49 am
 DES MOINES, IA - Iowa Cubs infielder Marquez Smith has been placed on the disabled list today due to left hand soreness.  In a corresponding move, infielder Marwin Gonzalez has been promoted to Iowa from Double-A Tennessee.


Smith fouled off a ball during Iowa's game Friday night against Memphis and was removed during the at-bat after being examined by the team trainer.  X-rays have been taken and the team is awaiting the official results.  Smith was hitting .283 with 15 doubles, six home runs, and 31 RBI in 66 games with Iowa this season.


Gonzalez, a switch-hitting 22 year old, is in his sixth professional season and will join the I-Cubs for the first time in his career.  In 64 games with the Tennessee Smokies this season, he hit .301 with a team-leading 18 doubles, two home runs, and 20 RBI.  Playing in the Venezuelan Winter League last year he finished among the top five in the league in runs, hits, RBI, batting average, and OBP.  Gonzalez is expected to join the Cubs and be available for today's game against the Albuquerque Isotopes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 26, 2011, 01:23:18 pm
This is awfully close to the inverted "W" for Ben Wells, no?

Any reason that's not called an "M?"

I've just been curious about that for the longest time.

Does anybody know?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 26, 2011, 01:31:57 pm
Probably just because "inverted W" makes it sound more official and credible as an actual cause of an injury.

Has there been any actual evidence that the inverted W is bad?  Or is it all just anecdotal evidence based on a relatively large number of big name pitchers getting hurt when using these mechanics?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 26, 2011, 02:55:45 pm
good question.  I think there is some reason to think it's a problem.  But when failure examples include Smoltz and Wainright, I'm not sure if it's that problematic if it takes 2000 innings and 160 big-league victories before it causes trouble, as with Smoltz.  Smoltz has over 3,400 big-league innings; he may not be nolan ryan, but injury prone he wasn't, and I htink we'd all be thrilled if Ben Wells has a career like Smoltz. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 26, 2011, 05:20:52 pm
A lot of people smoke and never get lung cancer.  None the less, smoking is dangerous.

It may be that an inverted W is dangerous also, even though not everyone that does it suffers injuries.  But as far as I know, there has never been a study of what percentage of pitchers with that particular mechanic actually do get injured.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2011, 05:36:48 pm
Beeler: 5-11-6-5-0-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_26_tenaax_biraax_1


Simpson: 5-2/3 -10-4-1-1-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_26_kccafx_peoafx_1

Castillo: 1-2, HR, RBI, 2 BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_26_albaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2011, 08:27:43 pm
Bour: 0-4, 2 K , ( OPS vs LHP = .435 )

Rhee: 6-7-4-4-0-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_26_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 26, 2011, 08:29:02 pm
It may be that an inverted W is dangerous also, even though not everyone that does it suffers injuries.  But as far as I know, there has never been a study of what percentage of pitchers with that particular mechanic actually do get injured.

We are talking about baseball here.

Why actually study things to reach informed decisions?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2011, 08:32:45 pm
An extensive look at Hayden Simpson's issue with mono and problems to start the season:

http://www.csnchicago.com/06/25/11/Cubs-Simpson-looking-to-round-back-into-/landing_onthefarm.html?blockID=537492&feedID=619
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2011, 10:51:52 pm
Hoilman: 2-4, 2B, K

Burke: 2-4-1-1-0-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_26_spoasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2011, 11:49:29 pm
Geiger: 3-4, 2B, RBI, BB, K

Hernandez: 2-6, 2 RBI, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_26_cubrok_dodrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on June 27, 2011, 09:58:03 am
A lot of people smoke and never get lung cancer.  None the less, smoking is dangerous.

It may be that an inverted W is dangerous also, even though not everyone that does it suffers injuries.  But as far as I know, there has never been a study of what percentage of pitchers with that particular mechanic actually do get injured.

Sounds like we need all the deep pockets here like davep and Craig(you can't tell me those chemistry professors don't make a ton of money) to donate a few million each to commission a study on the percentage of these guys that get injured compared to other techniques.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 27, 2011, 10:23:03 am
An extensive look at Hayden Simpson's issue with mono and problems to start the season:

http://www.csnchicago.com/06/25/11/Cubs-Simpson-looking-to-round-back-into-/landing_onthefarm.html?blockID=537492&feedID=619

Thanks for the link, Chris.  I'd say this pretty well explains his struggles this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 27, 2011, 01:56:30 pm
Casey Harman and his WHIP of 0.67  moves from Peoria to Daytona

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t450&t=p_pbp&pid=594848 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t450&t=p_pbp&pid=594848)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 27, 2011, 02:07:07 pm
Soft tosser...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 27, 2011, 02:26:20 pm
A little more on Harman

http://oursportscentral.com/services/releases/?id=4234594
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 27, 2011, 02:36:48 pm
My notes have him with an 86 - 89 mph cut fastball and a decent curve and good change up, with excellent control.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on June 27, 2011, 03:34:43 pm
Per the radio broadcast, Bobby Scales is now a Ham Fighter...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 27, 2011, 03:46:26 pm
Good for Scales.

He'll probably make some real money of there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 27, 2011, 04:07:47 pm
First five hitters in Iowa's lineup tonight:

Byrd
Barney
Colvin
LaHair
Castillo
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2011, 06:28:44 pm
Vitters w/ PH Sac Fly in the 13th to win it.

Jackson: 0-5,   22-108 ( .204) since end of April


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_27_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 27, 2011, 09:17:34 pm
Colvin with a double and another home run so far today.  Send down Montenez, bring up Colvin, and continue to play him somewhere even when Byrd comes back.  Bench Soriano if necessary.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2011, 09:27:49 pm
You want to call up Colvin already? He's not been much more than average since being sent down.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2011, 09:29:37 pm
Ha: 0-4, K ,   34-152 (.224) since May 1


Hatley: 1-0-0-0-0-2, SV

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_27_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 27, 2011, 09:34:49 pm
Montanez is doing okay, sorta flying under the radar.  I'd like to keep him  a little longer and see if we found a late bloomer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 27, 2011, 09:38:23 pm
Montanez is doing OK?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 27, 2011, 09:44:58 pm
Well, he's out-hitting his career .580 OPS by .002...so that's something, I guess.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2011, 09:46:32 pm
The problem is it's the PCL. Koyie Hill would probably OPS .950 there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 27, 2011, 09:50:06 pm
The problem is it's the PCL. Koyie Hill would probably OPS .950 there.
Sounds like we owe it to Iowa to send Hill there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 27, 2011, 09:51:42 pm
Agree with P2.  Why are we denying those poor Iowans the pleasure of Hill?  Those in Baja Minnesota have nothing.  Nothing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2011, 10:36:58 pm
Szczur: 3-6, 2B, RBI

Suarez: 1-1/3 -1-0-0-1-4 , (22 K's in 13-2/3 IP)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_27_peoafx_wisafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2011, 11:26:27 pm
Wells: 4-7-4-4-1-4, HB, HR

Golden: 2-4, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_27_spoasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2011, 12:00:06 am
Geiger: 2-4, HR, RBI

Zapata: 2-4, 2B

First two to try stealing against Rafael Lopez fail.



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_27_angrok_cubrok_1


Gaub: 4-1-0-0-2-7

Maine: 3-1-0-0-2-7 , 13 K's last 6 IP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_27_albaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2011, 03:08:13 am
Piece on Cam Greathouse:

http://www.idahopress.com/sports/great-expectations-for-hawks-greathouse/article_18ca299e-a154-11e0-a642-001cc4c03286.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on June 28, 2011, 07:24:12 am
After an awful start, Logan Watkins has been hot lately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 28, 2011, 07:52:30 am
The Cubs are sure taking their time signing anybody.  They have basically signed the college seniors and little else.  I thought Ricketts said they were going to spend more on the draft?  If so they better hurry the hell up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 28, 2011, 08:07:49 am
The Cubs are sure taking their time signing anybody.  They have basically signed the college seniors and little else.  I thought Ricketts said they were going to spend more on the draft?  If so they better hurry the hell up.

No.  The actual reports were that he gave directions to draft without regard to signability or what the guy was likely to demand.  From that folks inferred that Ricketts intended to open up the purse strings and allow a lot of heavily overslot signings, but I haven't seen any reports that he actually said he was going to spend heavily or was going to permit a lot of overslot signings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2011, 08:14:57 am
Oneri Fleita was in Boise last week and mentioned the fact that the Cubs were behind in signings, basically saying it was no big deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 28, 2011, 08:17:57 am
Colvin with a double and another home run so far today.  Send down Montenez, bring up Colvin, and continue to play him somewhere even when Byrd comes back.  Bench Soriano if necessary.

If it were simply a matter of giving Colvin playing time in the majors, with a sensible expectation that it would help him develop, I would be all for that.

But Colvin has been terrible this year in the majors, and he has only been in Iowa for 25 games.  While he has been doing very well lately (.350 BA and OPS of 1.024), overall in those 25 games he is still at .295 with an OPS of .906... and an OBP of just 11 points better than his BA, only 3 walks in 105 AB, and in his recent hot streak, he has an OBP lower than his BA, indicating he still is not willing to take a walk, and that simply is not likely to fly in the majors.

Let his have at least a full month of sustained dominance in the minors, while also encouraging him to take a few walks so he can show he is capable of doing both, before calling him back up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 28, 2011, 08:20:09 am
I thought Reggie Golden was expected to be a power guy?

So far in 51 combined AB between Boise and Arizona, no HR.  Is my memory wrong about his scouting reports?

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=RF&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=592342
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 28, 2011, 09:38:43 am
Pyrite
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 28, 2011, 09:51:15 am
No.  The actual reports were that he gave directions to draft without regard to signability or what the guy was likely to demand.  From that folks inferred that Ricketts intended to open up the purse strings and allow a lot of heavily overslot signings, but I haven't seen any reports that he actually said he was going to spend heavily or was going to permit a lot of overslot signings.

http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/10/09/tom-ricketts-confirms-payroll-drop-but-says-money-will-shift-to-player-development-and-scouting/


http://www.bleachernation.com/2011/06/16/mostly-tom-ricketts-comments-and-other-bullets/

I didn't infer anything.  Ricketts said out of his own mouth that they will be spending more on the draft.  So far they have signed none of their top 17 picks.  Not one.  That is a concern considering the cut off is in August which was the point of my post.  Of course you don't really look for the point of someone's post, you look for a reason to tell them they are wrong.  In this case you are wrong so eat it. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2011, 10:18:17 am
Fleita said signing some of the high schoolers was proving difficult.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 28, 2011, 10:49:47 am
You want to call up Colvin already? He's not been much more than average since being sent down.

I think Colvin should stay in Iowa until his confidence is completely back.  There's no sense having him yo yo between Iowa and Chicago every time he has a good week or two in Iowa.  Give him a good month or two to get his head on straight before bringing him back up for good, which is what we should have done the last time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 28, 2011, 11:25:11 am
The Cubs are sure taking their time signing anybody.  They have basically signed the college seniors and little else.  I thought Ricketts said they were going to spend more on the draft?  If so they better hurry the hell up.

The Cubs took a lot of high schoolers, and that has to slow the process down considerably, especially when their agents know the Cubs are willing to spend superslot on high schoolers to get them signed whether they deserve it or not, like Chris Huseby or Logan Watkins. 

I did a random search of about 12 teams, and I only noticed four high schoolers who have been signed among those teams' top 10 picks.  It's not like a lot of other teams are getting their high schoolers signed quickly either. 

We'll see how it goes.  The Cubs only have two traditional college picks in their Top 10 with Tony Zych and Taylor Dugas.  The rest of their Top 10 picks have pretty considerable leverage (7 high schoolers and one draft eligible sophomore), and considering we are relatively free spending in the draft, I'm sure they're going to use their leverage to get every last penny they can get.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 28, 2011, 11:50:26 am
The Cubs took a lot of high schoolers, and that has to slow the process down considerably, especially when their agents know the Cubs are willing to spend superslot on high schoolers to get them signed.

The snot nosed little brat is right.  Signing overslot high school free agents is a slow process, and most do not sign until about August.

whether they deserve it or not, like Chris Huseby or Logan Watkins. 


As usual he screws up his assessment with a silly comment.  High school players (and for that matter, all free agents) are paid a signing bonus based on their potential, and whether or not they fulfill that potential (the vast majority DO NOT), they still deserved their bonuses.  Husby was well on the track of fulfilling that potential before he became injured, the common ending to a prospect's potential.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 28, 2011, 02:20:00 pm
As usual he screws up his assessment with a silly comment.  High school players (and for that matter, all free agents) are paid a signing bonus based on their potential, and whether or not they fulfill that potential (the vast majority DO NOT), they still deserved their bonuses.  Husby was well on the track of fulfilling that potential before he became injured, the common ending to a prospect's potential.

I don't think there were many people who felt Huseby had $1.3 million potential or Watkins had $500K potential when they were signed, though.  Both of those signing bonuses were thought of as being very excessive for their perceived talent even when they were drafted. 

And I'm not saying that's especially bad policy for us to be handing out signing bonuses like that, but the agents for all of these high school players have to be looking at that and thinking the Cubs will eventually pay whatever they want if they wait it out long enough.  A guy like Trevor Gretzky, for example, who I really don't think was even considered a Top 10 round talent by most teams, probably has to think he could possibly get 3rd round money if he waits it out long enough because that's what the Cubs usually do to get a high school player they like signed. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 28, 2011, 02:24:21 pm
I was not familiar with any baseball people that thought the signings were excessive.  There were, of course, some people on this board that made such assessments, but were there any that were not made out of anything but ignorance?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 28, 2011, 02:26:36 pm
Well here's definitely one for Watkins.

Watkins hit .476 as a senior at Goddard and generated some predraft buzz, but not nearly enough to indicate that a team would spend $500,000.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2008/07/shockers-infield-takes-a-double-hit/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 28, 2011, 02:27:26 pm
One.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 28, 2011, 03:31:10 pm
http://www.bleachernation.com/2010/10/09/tom-ricketts-confirms-payroll-drop-but-says-money-will-shift-to-player-development-and-scouting/

http://www.bleachernation.com/2011/06/16/mostly-tom-ricketts-comments-and-other-bullets/

I didn't infer anything.  Ricketts said out of his own mouth that they will be spending more on the draft.  So far they have signed none of their top 17 picks.  Not one.  That is a concern considering the cut off is in August which was the point of my post.

Those links certainly report that, but the first one, written by "Ace," does not indicate the writer was actually present when Ricketts said anything and appears to be "Ace" is putting together a collection of quotes of Ricketts from other sources, and then including his impression.  Nowhere in the "quotes" does Ricketts say that he is "going to spend more on the draft."  In fact, the first bullett-point from "Ace," which is the only one really addressing the question of whether Ricketts is "going to spend some more on the draft," states as follows:

In his press conference yesterday (which would have been June 15th0, Tom Ricketts reiterated his commitment to spending more on draft picks and international signings, which, particularly given the “tough sign” nature of many of the Cubs’ draft picks this year, is very encouraging to hear.

Nowhere in there is Ricketts quoted as saying the Cubs will spend more on the draft, but instead we get the impression of "Ace" as to what Ricketts said at a press conference "Ace" would appear not to have attended, since he offers no direct quotes of Ricketts, except when he is quoting others who are quoting Ricketts.... and in none of those quotes does Ricketts say the Cubs will spend more on the draft.

The second link, also by the renowned sports reporter known as "Ace," appears to be based entirely on Ricketts 'October 8, 2010, letter to season ticket holders, sent the day before "Ace's" internet exclusive column.... and nowhere in it does "Ace" quote Ricketts as saying the that the Cubs will spend more on the draft.

So, in summary, not to p*ss you off, but it does appear that you inferred Ricketts intended to spend more on the draft.  Or perhaps you did not infer it, and simply saw it elsewhere, because I don't think it was in either of those two links.

If I misread either of them, and it would not be a first, please simply direct me to the language that I missed.

Now, please don't misunderstand me.  I share your concern about the Cubs not having signed many folks yet.  I have commented several times, both this year and before, that I think it is important to get meaningful prospects signed and into the program to start getting the instruction the team wants.  And I commented earlier that it was somewhat concerning that the Cards had signed so many more of their picks than the Cubs, and that it is even more troubling that Ricketts is quoted as telling Hendry to draft without regard to signability concerns and then apparently either not cough up the money to sign folks or to allow Hendry to dick around and drag out signings.

I think we are on the same page here.... but so far I have not seen any quote from Ricketts saying the Cubs were in fact going to spend more on the 2011 draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 28, 2011, 03:58:40 pm
Well, they certainly won't spend more money if they don't sign any of their top 17 picks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 28, 2011, 04:04:58 pm
I wouldn't be surprised if they sign one or two of them yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on June 28, 2011, 08:17:22 pm
Brett Jackson's year is really disappointing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 28, 2011, 08:40:21 pm
Does anyone have Jackson's numbers pre-injury vs. post-injury?  Hand injuries are killers for hitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2011, 09:37:59 pm



McNutt: 3-6-4-4-3-0

Jackson: 1-5, 2B, 3 K, Assist

Flaherty: 3-4, HR, 5 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_28_cmcaax_tenaax_1


Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_28_albaaa_iowaaa_1


Ha: 1-4, 3 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_28_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2011, 10:00:46 pm
Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_28_peoafx_wisafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2011, 10:03:44 pm
Je Baez: 3-5, 3 SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_28_dcurok_dorrok_1


Penalver: 3-6, 2 RBI, K

Candelario: 3-3, 2B, RBI

Arcila: 2-3, 2B, 2 RBI, SB, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_28_drgrok_dchrok_1




Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 28, 2011, 10:50:35 pm
Flaherty is really having a terrific season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 28, 2011, 11:04:38 pm
Flaherty is really having a terrific season.

Don't tell that to the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 28, 2011, 11:13:41 pm
I thought Reggie Golden was expected to be a power guy?

So far in 51 combined AB between Boise and Arizona, no HR.  Is my memory wrong about his scouting reports?

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=RF&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=592342

Another home run by Golden today.  Man, that guy has a lot of power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 28, 2011, 11:14:44 pm
Geiger is really hot.  His 2nd day in a row with a HR, he's slugging up near 1.000. 

Mesa is trying to use a lefties-only starting rotation.  Not sure when they last tried a RH starter, but it's been I think at least four staight lefties, DelValle with another 3 shutout innings today, his second start in four days.  Pugliese 3 more shutout innings.  Wang a good start. 

Wilson Contreras is 3-3, he just turned 19 last month, so I'm pretty interested in him.  Golden with his first pro homer tonight, he's whiffed 1/3 of his AB, but i thought he'd struggle much worse than he has thus far, encouraging. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2011, 11:23:33 pm
May need a Geiger counter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 28, 2011, 11:26:31 pm
May need a Geiger counter.

Definitely.

And Shawon-o-meter, Jr.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 28, 2011, 11:28:34 pm
Del Valle has only one walk in 5 innings.  Not very Cublike.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 28, 2011, 11:47:54 pm


McNutt: 3-6-4-4-3-0

In his three starts in June, McNutt has 0 K's and 8 BB's.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2011, 11:50:38 pm
Amaya: 3-4, 2B, 3 RBI, BB

Zapata: 2-4, BB, SB

Geiger: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_28_cubrok_diarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 12:12:48 am
Hoilman: 0-4, 3 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_28_boiasx_triasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 03:17:33 am
Catcher Luis Flores returned to the Smokies on Tuesday after a short stint with the High-A Daytona Cubs. Flores is joined by infielder David Macias, who will make his first appearance in Class AA. The moves correspond to the promotion of shortstop Marwin Gonzalez to Class AAA Iowa on Sunday and the suspension of infielder Matt Camp. Camp was suspended indefinitely by the Chicago Cubs for undisclosed reasons.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 29, 2011, 08:57:56 am
For those who are troubled by the fact that the Cubs have not signed many of their draft picks, much less their top ones ... here's Bruce Miles on that subject.

Read nothing into it (http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/5931#comment-123809)Another poster posted that these take time. It's true. I suspect the Cubs will have a lot of overslots this year. They will sign most, if not all, of their earlier picks. They really have to. Ricketts already is on record as saying they're putting more into scouting and development. But you won't see signing action pick up until July and August.
Posted by Bruce on Wed, 06/29/2011 - 08:48
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2011, 10:18:27 am
Not signing these kids until near the signing deadline close to writes off a year of their development.  They may be playing somewhere right now and until signing, but it will not be with the instruction the Cubs want for them, and often will be with little if any instruction at all.

But then, when you have a dominant franchise that has just been kicking-a** for the last 100+ season, I suppose writing off one season of a prospect's development, and perhaps delaying arrival in the majors by another year really doesn't matter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on June 29, 2011, 10:39:38 am
Not signing these kids until near the signing deadline close to writes off a year of their development.  They may be playing somewhere right now and until signing, but it will not be with the instruction the Cubs want for them, and often will be with little if any instruction at all.

But then, when you have a dominant franchise that has just been kicking-a** for the last 100+ season, I suppose writing off one season of a prospect's development, and perhaps delaying arrival in the majors by another year really doesn't matter.

I agree with you that it sucks year after year these high school kids lose a year of development time, but the question becomes how much of a premium would you pay to get them in the system and an extra half year of development time?  An extra 30-50% of what you could get them for August 15th?  if it was 10% or so, it would be worth it to me if i was writing the checks, but the bonuses these guys want a lot of times are so out of whack with what they end up getting, I'm not really sure what they can do.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2011, 11:13:21 am
We don't know how much of a premium it would take.  Or if it would take any premium at all.  All that we know is:

1) That Ricketts told Hendry and Wilkens not to worry about the money and to draft the best prospects available;

2) That the Cubs under Hendry seem to have a track record of taking more signings late into the process than many other teams;

3) That the Cubs have not done a good job of developing prospects under Hendry or under anyone in at least 50 years;

4) That the Cubs drafted a lot of guys who were reasonably projected to have signability concerns;

5) That the Cubs have not signed any of them;

6) That some prospects in recent years (since Hendry was GM) have indicated that the Cubs did not even contact them to offer a contract in the first few weeks after the draft, or seemed to drag their feet after the first contact.

I mentioned before the draft that for some of the signability picks it would make sense (in order to get them into the fold and into uniform and instruction quickly) to make reasonable/generous offers immediately, based not only on the evaluation of the prospect but on indications before the draft as to what it would require to sign the guy, and to make clear with the offer that it would GO DOWN for each day or week of delay and that after a given period it would simply be withdrawn and (for those draft picks where the rules allow it) the Cubs would simply take an additional draft pick for 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 11:18:32 am
Not signing these kids until near the signing deadline close to writes off a year of their development.

It only "writes off" about 2 months tops, and it's not unusual that draftees don't sign until near the deadline. This was even more the case years ago before they moved the signing deadline well up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2011, 11:42:51 am
We don't know how much of a premium it would take.  Or if it would take any premium at all.  All that we know is:

2) That the Cubs under Hendry seem to have a track record of taking more signings late into the process than many other teams;


Is that accurate?  I have never seen statistics, but I have never noticed a difference between the Cubs speed in signing overslot prospects and that of the other Clubs.
We don't know how much of a premium it would take.  Or if it would take any premium at all.  All that we know is:

6) That some prospects in recent years (since Hendry was GM) have indicated that the Cubs did not even contact them to offer a contract in the first few weeks after the draft, or seemed to drag their feet after the first contact.


It has been my understanding that many, if not all clubs, including the Red Sox and Rays, draft players in order to follow them in summer ball before making the decision to sign them.  This allows intensive scouting of players that could not be followed intensively before the draft.  In other words, most clubs wait until late July and August before beginning negotiations with some of their overslot players.

The Cubs, on the other hand, have often been criticized for drafting players that are easy and quick signs, rather than the overslot guys.  The last two years especially, they have been criticized for drafting so many 4th year college players, the implication being that they were easy signs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on June 29, 2011, 12:00:58 pm
I've never noticed the cubs really taking longer than other teams either.   On the other side of the coin, about Aug 15th every year, my lsu fighting tigers lose a plethora of prospects to the draft...all the high ceiling kids almost always wait till late to squeeze out every penny they can.  Both sides use the deadline to get the best deal they possibly can.

Jes, you said you weren't sure it would take any premium at all to sign these kids earlier, do you really believe that or were you just providing the other side of the coin argument?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2011, 12:06:03 pm
Does that sound like something Jes would do?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 29, 2011, 12:11:36 pm
Thanks Ron. 

I don't get this totally, though.  It's not surprising that many guys are late.  Yes, we know that some are going to be overslots and take longer. 

The surprise, I think, is that they've signed only one player, Pugliese, other than the 22 year olds. 

It's not like every non-senior is a major superslot.  I don't think Tiny Dugas, or Zeke DeVoss.  Or Garrett Schlecht or Taylor Scott, for that matter.  And I don't really think there is any reason to expect Baez to command overslot. 

It is true that Selig has obstructed approval of major superslots, and has held those back till August to prevent them from redefining slot.  But at least in past, the standard HS/JC overslot/slot has been approved routinely.  The kind of $120-200K 6th-10th round slot deal that absolutely every JC/HS kid gets offered at minimum whether he's round 10, 20, or 43. You know, $100-150 in cash, plus college room-and-board covered if you end up wanting it.   Fitzgerald, Kurcz, Richardson, Reed, Greathouse, all signed by mid-June last year and were approved pretty much immediately. 

It may be, of course, that a handful of kids have already agreed to such deals, and they are sitting on somebody's desk in Selig's office waiting to get approved while mlb is dealing with Dodgers stuff or something, who knows.  Or maybe Selig has decided to obstruct even those kinds of routine non-superslot overslots. 

Or maybe as JR says, every one of those kids figures he can geet $250 or $300 from the Cubs if they only stall, and don't want to jump the gun and accept $125 like McNutt did if by waiting they can get more. 


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 29, 2011, 01:01:38 pm
That's one of my pet peeves. McNutt gets flak for signing for $125 instead of $275, but if he gets to the big leagues sooner, he'll get a good return on his investment. Even an extra month added to his MLB career at his final salary might be worth $2 million or more.

If I were a prospect and had confidence in my own abilites, I'd take the first reasonable offer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2011, 01:44:32 pm
ArizonaPhil

21-year old Cuban defector LHP Frank Del Valle was masterful, allowing just one-hit (a harmless single) and a walk over his three innings (42 pitches - 26 strikes). He struck out only two, but that's a bit misleading because he got a lot of swings & misses early in the count (and broken bats when D'backs hitters did make contact) with his plus-fastball and filthy slider.


Like many Cuban players who have defected, Del Valle is polished and has obviously been well-coached. He is an excellent fielder, and he also has a really neat pick-off move (he picked two runners off 1st base tonight, but one of them got a reprieve when Del Valle was called for a balk). He was a member of the Cuban Junior National Team as a teenager, so he must have been given a lot of time and attention from the Cuban coaches over the years, and it shows. I doubt that Del Valle will remain in Mesa very long, and so it will be up to him to prove that he is more than just spit & polish once he hits the higher levels (Peoria or Daytona or wherever).


Del Valle is only 5'11, but his upper body is well-built. He looks like he has spent some serious time in the weight room.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2011, 01:46:49 pm
More

18-year old RHP James Pugliese (Cubs 2011 18th round draft pick out of Mercer CC in New Jersey) made his third pro appearance, "piggybacking" with Del Valle and throwing three more shutout innings (40 pitches - 26 strikes). He did allow three singles and a walk, but he also struck out two and induced one inning-ending double play, and none of the runners got past second base. After tonight's outing, Pugliese is tied for the AZL league lead in ERA and is third in WHIP. As I have mentioned before, Pugliese throws with a max-effort over-the-top overhand delivery much like that of Arizona Diamondbacks rookie RHP Josh Collmenter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2011, 01:47:22 pm
And

Cubs 2011 32nd round draft pick RHP Pete Levitt (Mt. Olive College) relieved Hartman and did throw strikes (33 pitches - 25 strikes), working the final 2.1 IP to pick-up his first professional save. At 6'5 250+ Levitt looks more like an offensive tackle than a pitcher, but he works fast, throws strikes, and gets outs when he needs to get them. But he is really a load. When I say he's 6'5 250+ it's probably more like 6'5 270. He reminds me of Bobby Jenks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on June 29, 2011, 01:48:20 pm
wondering if anyone has a good scouting report on this Jeffrey Baez kid down with one of the DSL teams. looks interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2011, 01:50:38 pm
Wasn't he one of the high bonus signings?  Can anyone repost that list?  All I remember is Silva and Cabaza.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 29, 2011, 03:17:37 pm
PCL All-Stars -  July 13 vs IL at Salt Lake City

1B Bryan LaHair
RP John Gaub
C Welington Castillo
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 29, 2011, 03:47:18 pm
Jacey: the very first page of this thread has the list about DSL and Asian signings. Not listed there, but for me the 2 most interesting things about Baez, are that his middle name is Nazareth, and his home town in Venezuela is "El Tigre".

From the 3rd-ever post in On The Farm on this version of BBF:

and Jeffrey Baez, whose $350,000 from the Cubs was the second-most last year for a Venezuelan outfielder. Baez, 17, is a 6-foot, 170-pound righthanded hitter with athleticism, speed and a long-levered, projectable body. He's a plus-plus runner who could slow down as he fills out, but he has the present speed to play center field, good body control and an average arm. Baez's bat is still coming along but he has projectable power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 29, 2011, 04:39:52 pm
ArizonaPhil

21-year old Cuban defector LHP Frank Del Valle was masterful, allowing just one-hit (a harmless single) and a walk over his three innings (42 pitches - 26 strikes). He struck out only two, but that's a bit misleading because he got a lot of swings & misses early in the count (and broken bats when D'backs hitters did make contact) with his plus-fastball and filthy slider.

.....
Del Valle is only 5'11, but his upper body is well-built. He looks like he has spent some serious time in the weight room.


Thanks, Dave.  Nice to get some scouting info on him.  I'm still curious about what we paid to sign him.  Would be fun if he'd be the first of our Cuban investments to be remotely successful.  Serrano hasn't been very interesting, and of course Siva and Cabeza don't seem to have any hitting aptitude.  Would be fun if Del Vallle was good. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2011, 05:31:45 pm
Not signing these kids until near the signing deadline close to writes off a year of their development.

It only "writes off" about 2 months tops

The draft was what, June 6th?  The signing deadline is August 15th at midnight.

Sign a guy by June 10th and you have him in Boise for the remainder of the season, and can meaningfully place him in 2012, moving most to Peoria, but perhaps some to Daytona and once in a very rare while perhaps even to Jackson.

But if he doesn't sign early enough to get in real playing time at Boise, he starts in Boise in 2012, and that leaves his development an entire season behind the curve.

When you say it is only "2 months tops," you are ignoring the fact that the minor league season ends at the end of August, and the Boise season is only about 70 games long.  Miss "only 2 months tops" of a 70 game season and you have missed the season.

Look at Vitters.  In 2007 he singed at the deadline, August 15th.  He then had 7 games in the Arizona instructional league after he signed and 7 more in Boise.  And then his season was over, and in 2008, he started back in Boise and played there nearly the entire season (61 games) before his promotion for 4 games in Peoria.

Imagine if he had spent the 2007 season at Boise and then started in 2008 in Peoria, and had continued with the same path of progress he has had.... and was a year younger at each stop.  Would even his doubters be doubting if he had performed as he has so far while a year younger at each stop?

Sorry, but missing only "2 months tops" is very serious when the two months are the two months when short season rookie ball is playing.  We aren't talking about missing October and November.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2011, 05:37:25 pm
Is that accurate?  I have never seen statistics, but I have never noticed a difference between the Cubs speed in signing overslot prospects and that of the other Clubs.

It is very accurate that the Cubs under Hendry seem to have a track record of taking more signings late into the process than many other teams[/].  Whether my impression is accurate or not, I don't know.  That's why I used "seem."  I am not claiming it is the case.  I am merely saying that it "seems" that way.


The Cubs... have often been criticized
for drafting players that are easy and quick signs, rather than the overslot guys.  The last two years especially, they have been criticized for drafting so many 4th year college players, the implication being that they were easy signs.

Not something I have criticized.

Sounds like one of those JR criticisms to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2011, 07:19:47 pm
That's one of my pet peeves. McNutt gets flak for signing for $125 instead of $275, but if he gets to the big leagues sooner, he'll get a good return on his investment. Even an extra month added to his MLB career at his final salary might be worth $2 million or more.  If I were a prospect and had confidence in my own abilites, I'd take the first reasonable offer.

Sounds very much like I have been arguing for a few years now.

And if Selig is the source of delay, the Cubs need to start making some noise about it and try to come to some interim agreement with prospects who have agreed to unapproved contracts to the guys get into the system for instruction and evaluation, even if not formally signed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2011, 07:20:30 pm
Jes, you said you weren't sure it would take any premium at all to sign these kids earlier, do you really believe that or were you just providing the other side of the coin argument?

What I wrote was, "We don't know how much of a premium it would take.  Or if it would take any premium at all."

We might assume it to be the case, and for some it may well be the case.  But we do not know.

I have also said the Cubs should on the first day after the guy is drafted present reasonable/generous offers and then make clear that the offers have a given shelf-life, with the offer declining by a set amount each day to week or every five days of delay, and to make clear that the reason for this is that the Cubs want to get the guy into the system, getting professional instruction and weight-training and diet instruction, coaching and experience against other minor leaguers, all intended to give each prospect the best chance possible of making it to the major leagues as quickly as possible.  And to make clear that while certainly they could talk around the edges of the offer, that the offer was what the Cubs felt was reasonable and that if he didn't want to take it, then the Cubs, for whatever rounds it was possible, would simply take the extra draft pick next season, and that for the lower rounds they would simply encourage him to start making other plans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 08:16:14 pm
Sign a guy by June 10th and you have him in Boise for the remainder of the season, and can meaningfully place him in 2012, moving most to Peoria, but perhaps some to Daytona and once in a very rare while perhaps even to Jackson.

Those latter scenarios rarely happen, for one. For another, the players who start the seasons following their draft years in full-season leagues are usually college players who are ready for it. They don't need two months of rookie ball. Hayden Simpson, for example. Missed everything last year, pitching in Peoria.


Look at Vitters.

Vitters was a premium 1st round pick. They normally don't sign until close to the deadline, so I don't know why you use him as an example. Plus, Vitters was 17. It's highly questionable whether he would've started in a full-season league the following year regardless of when he signed.


Sorry, but missing only "2 months tops" is very serious when the two months are the two months when short season rookie ball is playing.

Very serious? No it isn't.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 08:58:57 pm

Jackson: 0-4, K ,  ( 7-40, 15 K's last 11 games )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_29_cmcaax_tenaax_1


Je Baez: 3-4, 2B, 3 SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_29_dparok_dcurok_1


Bour: 0-4, K, 2 E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_29_dbcafa_tbyafa_1


Iowa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 29, 2011, 09:01:39 pm
Jackson: 0-4, K ,  ( 7-40, 15 K's last 11 games )

Are Flaherty and LeMahieu the top two prospects in the organization?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2011, 09:32:16 pm
Sign a guy by June 10th and you have him in Boise for the remainder of the season, and can meaningfully place him in 2012, moving most to Peoria, but perhaps some to Daytona and once in a very rare while perhaps even to Jackson.

Those latter scenarios rarely happen, for one. For another, the players who start the seasons following their draft years in full-season leagues are usually college players who are ready for it. They don't need two months of rookie ball. Hayden Simpson, for example. Missed everything last year, pitching in Peoria.

The latter scenarios were jumps to Daytona or Jackson, which I pointed out were "very rare," but making it to Peoria a year earlier would not be rare at all for a prospect doing reasonably well after an early signing, and for HS prospects they are not often going to be ready to start in full season ball.


Vitters was a premium 1st round pick. They normally don't sign until close to the deadline, so I don't know why you use him as an example. Plus, Vitters was 17. It's highly questionable whether he would've started in a full-season league the following year regardless of when he signed.

The reason I used him as an example is because he illustrates the point.  In his case an early signing would likely have him in Iowa right now, and a realistic option for the Cubs at 1B or 3B in 2012, something which could easily save the Cubs $5-10M in 2012 by avoiding a perceived need to re-sign a Pena or ARam or some other high priced vet for 2012.

You apparently do not see that as being very serious.  Let's just say we define the word "serious" differently.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 29, 2011, 09:33:01 pm
Nah, Jackson is still it. Hand injuries are rough.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2011, 09:44:06 pm
The Cubs should shut Jackson down for a month to let his hand heal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 09:46:45 pm
and for HS prospects they are not often going to be ready to start in full season ball.

That's right, which is why it's not a big deal. Very few Bryce Harpers or Manny Machados.


In his case an early signing would likely have him in Iowa right now

I don't know how you can assert that. With his performance to this point, he's lucky he's in AA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 09:52:45 pm
I haven't heard anything suggesting Brett Jackson is having problems hitting because of the injury he suffered in May.

It should be noted that in his 12 games prior to the injury, Jackson was 7 for 37 (.189).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 09:54:29 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2B

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_29_peoafx_wisafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2011, 10:16:43 pm
None the less, hand injuries are extremely long in healing.  They should just set him down for a while.

We were told that lee was totally healed.  We were told that Ramirez was totally healed.  Their performances told us they weren't.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 10:23:15 pm
We were told that lee was totally healed.  We were told that Ramirez was totally healed.

Lee as in Derrick Lee?

If that's who you mean, I don't get your point. Lee's homers went down from a career high but he was healthy and wasn't going to sit for two years to wait for the extra power to return.


Just to be specific, Jackson's injury was to his pinkie. And he did miss two weeks. It's not like he continued playing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 29, 2011, 10:26:07 pm
Just off the top of my head, I would probably rank the top hitters on the farm as:

1. Ryan Flaherty
2. Matt Szczur
3. DJ LeMahieu
4. Josh Vitters
5. Brett Jackson
6. Jae-Hoon Ha

ETA: You know, I should probably flip LeMahieu and Vitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 10:39:28 pm
If that list is anything close to accurate, we're in deep ****.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 29, 2011, 10:52:47 pm
A Jackson-Szczur-Ha outfield might work out well.  After the bad outfield play we've seen these past few years, it would be a treat to have an outfield of three guys that could play really good defense, have usable offensive speed, and post an OPS in the high 700s.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2011, 10:54:40 pm
and post an OPS in the high 700s.

Ha's OPS the last two months in A-Ball is roughly .620
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 29, 2011, 10:59:09 pm
and post an OPS in the high 700s.

Ha's OPS the last two months in A-Ball is roughly .620

Well, he's 20 years old, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 29, 2011, 11:21:54 pm
Just off the top of my head, I would probably rank the top hitters on the farm as:

1. Ryan Flaherty
2. Matt Szczur
3. DJ LeMahieu
4. Josh Vitters
5. Brett Jackson
6. Jae-Hoon Ha

ETA: You know, I should probably flip LeMahieu and Vitters.

Guess we're F U C K E D then...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 29, 2011, 11:22:31 pm
Red-hot Reggie Golden with two more singles and a walk tonight, at the moment he's over .300. 

He's gone through 7 innings without a single K, and might only have one more AB.  If he can avoid a strikeout, it will break an 8-game strikeout streak, and will be the second time in his pro career where he's appeared in a game without striking out. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2011, 12:07:31 am
Golden: 3-3, 2B, BB, SB, Assist

Kim: 1-2-2-2-3-1

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_29_boiasx_triasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 30, 2011, 07:09:49 am
Golden's BABIP is up to .467. Obviously he's been super lucky, but getting his K-rate down to only slightly over 30% is better than I had realistically hoped for.  When you've K'd all your life like Brett Jackson, you know it won't go away.  But for teenagers like Golden or Geiger, with small sample sizes, I'm always hopeful that they can dramatically reduce their K's with larger samples or with improvement.  (Geiger this summer versus last, totally different K profile.) 

Regardless, after how awful Golden had been in the Az Phil box scores I'd seen, I figured he'd be this decade's version of Mike Mallory.  So I'm pleasantly surprised and encouraged that he's not totally overmatched.  Would be really fun if he just left the K's behind, showed some real power, and emerged as a true genuine legit hitter. 

Too much to hope for, I think...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2011, 07:40:49 am
and for HS prospects they are not often going to be ready to start in full season ball.

That's right, which is why it's not a big deal. Very few Bryce Harpers or Manny Machados.

Which is why it is important to get them signed quickly.  Sign them quickly after the draft and have them spend the summer in Boise, which would then allow those progressing normally to move to Peoria the next season, and those who truly rip up the league and also look good the following spring to be promoted even beyond that.  But if they do not sign quickly, even if they are as highly regarded as Vitters was, that means that the summer after they were drafted, they are going to spend it in short-season rookie ball.  It slows their development by a year.  And, yes, to me that is serious.


In his case an early signing would likely have him in Iowa right now

I don't know how you can assert that. With his performance to this point, he's lucky he's in AA.

Vitters has progressed well at every level, not once needing to be held back to repeat once he has had more than 200 AB at the level.  He is now hitting .279 with an OPS of .757.  The league BA is .263 and the league OPS is .737, and you believe that "with his performance to this point, he's lucky" to be there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2011, 09:50:13 am
Sign them quickly after the draft and have them spend the summer in Boise, which would then allow those progressing normally to move to Peoria the next season,

As I already mentioned, HS players rarely begin their first season in a full season league. And if they do, it's because they are special enough to handle it and probably don't need the time in short season anyway.

Vitters' development has been slowed by his inability to produce offensively and his proclivity to make errors. I hope you don't think two months in Mesa would've changed that. Considering all the time he's missed with injuries, the fact that he's in his second stint in Tennessee is amazing in itself.


not once needing to be held back to repeat once he has had more than 200 AB at the level.

Just because the Cubs promoted him doesn't mean he should've been promoted. That isn't proof of success.


Now how I ended up getting into a silly discussion about Vitters when the topic was the timing of draftees signing, I'll never know.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 30, 2011, 10:06:29 am
Sign them quickly after the draft and have them spend the summer in Boise, which would then allow those progressing normally to move to Peoria the next season,

As I already mentioned, HS players rarely begin their first season in a full season league. And if they do, it's because they are special enough to handle it and probably don't need the time in short season anyway.

Vitters' development has been slowed by his inability to produce offensively and his proclivity to make errors. I hope you don't think two months in Mesa would've changed that. Considering all the time he's missed with injuries, the fact that he's in his second stint in Tennessee is amazing in itself.


not once needing to be held back to repeat once he has had more than 200 AB at the level.

Just because the Cubs promoted him doesn't mean he should've been promoted. That isn't proof of success.


Now how I ended up getting into a silly discussion about Vitters when the topic was the timing of draftees signing, I'll never know.
You sunk to the challenge.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2011, 10:19:38 am
Like a stone.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2011, 11:00:33 am
Sign them quickly after the draft and have them spend the summer in Boise, which would then allow those progressing normally to move to Peoria the next season,

As I already mentioned, HS players rarely begin their first season in a full season league. And if they do, it's because they are special enough to handle it and probably don't need the time in short season anyway.

Which is the reason it is important that they sign quickly.

Take virtually any HS prospect, and he is going to start in short season rookie ball.  If he signs near the deadline he will have so little time there that the summer after signing will be spent in short season rookie ball, and most will spend the entire season there.  If he instead signs quickly and spends that summer in short season rookie ball, any prospect developing normally will be in full season A ball, either low A or high A the next season.  That speeds development by a full season, all because of those 2 months.


Just because the Cubs promoted him (Vitters) doesn't mean he should've been promoted. That isn't proof of success.

Success is your word.  I did not use it. 

I merely pointed out that Vitters has progressed from one level to the next at a reasonable rate.  I did not say he did so early or late based on his age.  I was referring to the rate of progress.  If the rate of progress for a HS draft pick begins the year after being drafted because of too little or no time in short season ball the season of the draft, that does not appear to effect the RATE of progress, but certainly does appear to effect the timetable for reaching the majors, quite easily delaying it for a full season.  (I do want to correct myself where I earlier wrote that Vitters had not repeated any level where he had as many as 200 ABs.  That was wrong.  He had 206 ABs last year in AA ball.)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 30, 2011, 11:40:42 am
We were told that lee was totally healed.  We were told that Ramirez was totally healed.

Lee as in Derrick Lee?

If that's who you mean, I don't get your point. Lee's homers went down from a career high but he was healthy and wasn't going to sit for two years to wait for the extra power to return.


Just to be specific, Jackson's injury was to his pinkie. And he did miss two weeks. It's not like he continued playing.

My point was that it took Lee two years to recover from his injury.  If they had sat him longer after the injury, perhaps he could have been back after the first season.

Jackson's injury was to his finger.  Ramirez's injury was to his thumb.  It is tough to swing a bat when your hand is injured, and it is hard to heal when you are constantly putting stress on it.

Sitting Jackson for a while might not help.  Playing him right now certainly doesn't help.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2011, 12:13:21 pm
Sitting Jackson for a while might not help.  Playing him right now certainly doesn't help.

Sounds remarkably like the position someone was taking regarding Wells.

Seemed you didn't think that idea made sense then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 30, 2011, 01:23:14 pm
The difference is that I don't see any reason to think that Wells is injured.  I do think that Jackson is having hand problems.

Perhaps I should say that it SEEMS to me that Wells performance is not due to injury, while it SEEMS to me that Jackson's performance is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 30, 2011, 01:36:02 pm
The difference is that I don't see any reason to think that Wells is injured.

Pretty much everything about Wells could be interpreted as hiding an injury.  In addition to the fact that he has already been on the DL once this year (and he admitted he hid that injury for at least his last couple of spring training starts/first regular season start), his velocity is way down on every pitch he throws.  And he's not missing bats at all over his last 5 starts, indicating his stuff isn't sharp.  The walk rate and home run rate are also heading completely in the wrong direction.

I would be shocked if Wells makes it through the rest of this season without another trip to the DL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 30, 2011, 04:02:33 pm
I think there is every reason to think that Wells doesn't have the arm that he used to have. 

"injury" is an unclear term to me.  Following the injury Wells had, it may be that he is "healthy" and uninjured now, but that the healed arm simply does not and will never have the same freedom of movment and extension that his arm had before the injury.  He might not be "hurt", but he might have a healthy 88 mph fastball now when he had a healthy 92 fastball before.  In which case it's iffy whether time or disabled list will get back what was before. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2011, 05:08:11 pm
The difference is that I don't see any reason to think that Wells is injured.  I do think that Jackson is having hand problems.  Perhaps I should say that it SEEMS to me that Wells performance is not due to injury, while it SEEMS to me that Jackson's performance is.

What do you think it would be for Wells?

He's decided not to try hard any more?

Hangovers?

Mechanics are completely off, though no one can identify what he is doing wrong?

Thick air?

Slow radar guns that speed back up when other pitchers are on the mound?

Tipping his pitches while also holding back on them to lose some velocity?

I understand a pitcher losing a bit from one year to the next simply as a result of the natural process of aging, but Wells is 28.  Injury sounds like the most likely problem to me, which is why your sage advice seems so applicable:

"Sitting Jackson (or Wells)  for a while might not help.  Playing him right now certainly doesn't help.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 30, 2011, 05:19:50 pm
There's a difference between "still injured" and "not yet back to full strength, but unlikely to incur further injury." Any player coming back from a serious injury is likely to be less than 100% for a while. If Wells and his doctors think he's able to pitch, he should be pitching, not rusting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 30, 2011, 07:25:44 pm
Struck is looking and performing more like Ricky Nolasco every day.  Has good success, but gets no respect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2011, 08:40:48 pm
Cubsin, I don't know the answer to this, but wasn't Wells velocity down even before his injury?  And how long does it take to get back to "100%" from whatever his injury was?  He has been been back from more than a month, and effective in only one of five starts.  If he is NOT back from his injury and needs to work himself back into shape to where he is close enough to 100% to be effective, shouldn't he be doing that with rehab starts in the minors?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2011, 09:10:29 pm
Jackson: 2-3, BB

Vitters: 0-4, 2 K , ( 6 for last 29 )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_30_cmcaax_tenaax_1


Szczur: 0-4, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_30_peoafx_burafx_1


Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 30, 2011, 09:32:52 pm
Jes, I don't know how Wells fared this spring, and he was injured in his first start. He might have had a longer rehab if the Cubs weren't so desperate for starting pitching, but he is apparently well enough to pitch. Even at less than 100%, he's a better pitcher than Davis or Lopez.                                 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2011, 09:49:36 pm
  Even at less than 100%, he's a better pitcher than Davis or Lopez.

Perfectly sound reason to start him... if the Cubs had a chance of going anywhere and running him out there when he is ineffective does not cause him to alter his mechanics and injure himself or does not aggravate a physical problem which is causing him to be ineffective or no other team in baseball would consider how crappy he has been pitching if the Cubs later would try to trade him.

The Cubs are going NOWHERE in 2011.

Any decision made for the purpose of marginally improving the team this season which has a prospect of hurting the team in the long run in any way meaningfully increased than the risk which exists any time a game is played and a player runs the risk of injury, is a foolish risk.

Davis and Lopez are bums.  But they are bums who can consume innings without the risk of injury to anyone of value... since neither of them have any value.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2011, 10:18:58 pm
Maine's good run is over. He gave up a go-ahead grand slam in the 9th tonight.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_30_nozaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 30, 2011, 10:27:24 pm
MLB's second worst team.  MLB's worst farm system.  The MLB GM with the highest level of job security.

What's wrong with this picture?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 30, 2011, 10:51:48 pm
Jes, if Wells is ineffective, he has no trade value at all. He *** may (or may not) *** become a better pitcher in the future by learning how to record outs without his best stuff. If he's just resting for the balance of this season, he'll learn nothing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2011, 11:18:46 pm
Peralta: 5-3-1-1-1-5

Zapata: 2-4, 3B, RBI

Hernandez: 3-4, 2B, RBI, SB, CS, K

Amaya: 2-3, RBI, E, PO

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_30_royrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2011, 12:11:54 am
Cruz: 3-2/3 -3-3-1-0-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_06_30_boiasx_triasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 01, 2011, 02:31:02 am
Jes, if Wells is ineffective, he has no trade value at all.

Which is why I would shut him down to allow him to heal, or send him to the minors for an exetended rehab assignment.

He *** may (or may not) *** become a better pitcher in the future by learning how to record outs without his best stuff.

He also may (or may not) become a better pitcher in the future if he is given time for his body to fully recover from any problem it may be suffering.

If he's just resting for the balance of this season, he'll learn nothing.

True enough, but since learning something would not at all be the goal, the fact that he would not learn anything would not be a concern.

Assuming there is a physical component to his current difficulties, shutting him down would also significantly reduce the chance the problem would become worse.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 01, 2011, 02:14:08 pm
The patriotic holiday cap idea has spread to all the minor league teams.  Here's what the Smokies will wear on July 4.

(http://tennessee.smokies.milb.com/images/2011/06/30/wJHGn3R7.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 01, 2011, 02:16:21 pm
The stars in the "T" make it patriotic?  Why not put red and white stripes on the hat.

And a picture of George Washington.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 01, 2011, 02:44:46 pm
BA report on international signings:

With the international signing period opening at midnight, the market for this year's July 2 class is beginning to fall into place.

How the top players are lining up and where they might be headed are becoming clearer. All signs point to a market elevated from last year's in Latin America, with records likely to fall in the coming days.

Here is a preview of what to expect for all 30 teams once the international signing period begins.

HIGH ROLLERS

These teams should have the biggest international budgets this year. The High Rollers section is more crowded than usual this year, with 10 teams that have a good chance at handing out at least one seven-figure bonus.

Chicago Cubs: We'll have to wait a decade to know how well each team did with its 2010 international signings, but the early returns for the Cubs have been outstanding. Dominican third baseman Jeimer Candelario is playing like an MVP candidate in the Dominican Summer League, Venezuelan shortstop Carlos Penalver has an OBP over .400 in the DSL and Venezuelan outfielder Jeffrey Baez is among the DSL leaders in hits, stolen bases and runs. This year the Cubs' target appears to be Marck Malave, a switch-hitting catcher from Venezuela, and they'll likely be active for other Latin and Pacific Rim players as usual. They have also been linked to Dominican catcher Eric Otanez, and with two DSL teams and a Rookie-level Arizona club, they would have the roster space to pull it off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 01, 2011, 02:49:31 pm
Will they have matching skirts?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2011, 09:25:40 pm
Jackson: 2-4, HR, RBI, BB, K

Beeler: 7-6-3-3-1-2 , 2 HR

Beliveau: 2-0-0-0-0-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_cmcaax_tenaax_1



Bour: HR, 2 RBI

Antigua: 2-2-1-1-0-2 ,  ( 22 K / 4 BB in 17-1/3 IP in Daytona )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_dbcafa_tbyafa_1



Rhee: 7-2-0-0-1-6 (CG)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_dbcafa_tbyafa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2011, 09:25:52 pm
Je Baez: 1-2, 2 BB, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_dcurok_drdrok_1


Candelario: 2-4, 2B, RBI, BB, E

Penalver: 1-3, RBI, 2 BB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_dmerok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2011, 09:31:05 pm


Colvin: 2-4, 2B


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_nozaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 01, 2011, 09:37:01 pm
Dallas Beeler is an extreme strike-thrower.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 01, 2011, 10:14:53 pm
Dallas Beeler is an extreme strike-thrower.

may have just been umps...the other starting pitcher, MucCulloch had a better strike percentage than Beeler did.  71.6% to 60.9%. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 01, 2011, 10:24:29 pm
may have just been umps...the other starting pitcher, MucCulloch had a better strike percentage than Beeler did.  71.6% to 60.9%. 

Look at his overall stats for the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2011, 10:31:19 pm
Simpson: 1-2/3 -6-6-6-2-0

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_peoafx_burafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 01, 2011, 10:33:30 pm
Can we call Simpson another Cub first round bust yet?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 01, 2011, 10:38:06 pm
Look at his overall stats for the season.

Yeah, i see what you mean...it isn't often you see a guy with a chance to give up more homeruns than walks...i'm guessing he's a crafty lefty that throws with the right hand. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 01, 2011, 10:40:22 pm
Simpson: 1-2/3 -6-6-6-2-0

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_peoafx_burafx_1

*sigh*
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 01, 2011, 10:46:34 pm
Only the Cubs would have guys like Jeff Beliveau and Kevin Rhoderick in the minors pitching like they are and yet continue to employ John Grabow and Rodrigo Lopez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 01, 2011, 11:46:33 pm
Boise is winning in the 9th.  Reggie Golden has gone his 3rd straight game without a K, and has walked not once, not twice, not thrice, but four times. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 01, 2011, 11:48:30 pm
Boise is winning in the 9th.  Reggie Golden has gone his 3rd straight game without a K, and has walked not once, not twice, not thrice, but four times. 

He'll never get promoted.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 02, 2011, 12:14:41 am
Angel Guzman and Casey Harman are both continuing to do well after moving from Peoria to Daytona

PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Guzman, A (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=425768) 2.0 1000201.59
Antigua (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=506694) (W, 2-0)2.0 2110202.60
Hatley (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=502281) (H, 4)1.0 0002101.76
Harman (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=594848) (S, 1)2.0 1001400.00
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2011, 01:06:54 am
Lopez: 3-3, HR, 3 RBI, BB

Golden: 0-1, RBI, 4 BB

Burke: 3-3-3-3-1-6 , 2 WP

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_boiasx_yakasx_1

Amaya: 2-4, RBI, 2 BB, K

Hernandez: 2-6, 2B, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_01_athrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 02, 2011, 01:17:51 am
A pitcher against Boise was named Hamrick.  The name is familiar.  Did the Cubs once have a lefty named Hamrick?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2011, 03:48:06 am
BA put Vitters on its Not-So-Hot list with the common sidenote that he's basically too good to be any good at the plate.


Quote
Josh Vitters, 3b, Cubs: Last week was a synopsis of Vitters' struggles at the plate. He put balls in play, striking out twice, but only a lone single dropped in for a hit. His 1-for-3 effort sank Vitters' numbers to .274/.310/.435, still hovering above the Southern League average, but much more is expected of the 2007 third overall pick. Vitters' great hand-eye coordination can cause problems for him, as he makes plenty of contact, but sometimes on pitches that he was better off letting go.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 02, 2011, 07:19:08 am
Luis Liria has pitched quite well for Boise.  16K/1BB, I like strike-throwers.  He's 21. 

Hunter Ackerman with another decent game.  15K/8H/11.2 innings.  He K'd the side in the first yesterday.  And I think all non-K outs were groundouts.  Still seems to be somewhat inconsistent, lots of walks and seems that he has a struggle inning here or there.  Could be a guy with good stuff and a good arm who is still too raw and inconsistent, but who might increase his control/command/consistency and end up pretty good. 

May also just be a guy whose arm is blah, and who's living off his lefty curveball against rookie leaguers.  Doesn't take much of a lefty curve to get low-minors hitters out.  But the curve is the hardest pitch in the game to control, so perhaps it's the innings when the curve isn't working when he's walking and getting touched up. 

Kind of fun to have so many teenage hitters doing well in the short-season leagues.  Chen, Darvill, Golden, and Contreras are all doing well, I think maybe all of them have OBP's in the .400's.  Although Chen, the would-be leadoff guy, seems the hackiest of the  bunch.  But as always, it's about projection.  Contreras and Darvill have shown very little power, so sooner or later they'll need to if they are actually going to succeed. 

Interestingly at Mesa several of the 18-year-old Dominicans who were good last year are good again.  Zapata, Amaya, and Hernandez are all hitting/OBP'ing at a high rate, and all are 18.  Again, who knows for projection.  As a 5'9" outfielder without blazing speed, not sure how well Zapata projects.  Amaya isn't big and may not project power, either. Hernandez seems a low-walk guy, and not sure if he projects power, although he's at least 6'1", so might have the size.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 02, 2011, 11:19:05 am
I'm amazed at Golden's improvement...after hearing how atrocious he was this spring I had pretty much written him off.  But, after such improvement in so short a period of time, I can't help but wonder if in a two years he may be one of the cubs top prospects.  Raw talent is one thing, but the ability to employ it is a complete other, and, to have improved so quickly, he might have that ability.  I still worry about his laziness, however, as it has been the downfall to many a prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 02, 2011, 11:45:22 am
Interesting perspective on international signings from BA . . .

Finding a consensus on how to rank the top players in Latin America based on talent alone is a challenge.

While there is typically agreement among scouts about the pool of players from which first-round picks will come in any given draft, the variance of opinions on 15- and 16-year-olds in Latin America is considerable. One team's $1 million player can be a $90,000 guy for another club.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 02, 2011, 11:47:52 am
Mark Malave is projected to have the 8th highest signing bonus, and Eric Otanez is projected to have the 36th highest bonus.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 02, 2011, 12:05:40 pm
Interesting perspective on international signings from BA . . .

Finding a consensus on how to rank the top players in Latin America based on talent alone is a challenge.

While there is typically agreement among scouts about the pool of players from which first-round picks will come in any given draft, the variance of opinions on 15- and 16-year-olds in Latin America is considerable. One team's $1 million player can be a $90,000 guy for another club.
Fortunately, we have the Cubs' crack management staff to ensure that smart decisions are made.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 02, 2011, 12:13:14 pm
The Rangers signed Nomar Mazara to a Dominican record $5 million bonus.  BA only had him projected as the 10th highest signing bonus.  In their scouting report on Mazara, BA wrote, "Mazara has been the source of the most outrageous rumors regarding what teams have offered him . . ."

Maybe those rumors weren't so outrageous after all!  I guess this is just another example of how crazy things can get out there and that there are a lot of divergent opinions on how good a Latin player is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2011, 01:44:41 pm
We have a signing:

Quote
The Cubs have signed Dominican shortstop Enrique Acosta for $1.1 million.

Acosta, 16, is a 6-foot-1, 180-pound righthanded hitter who is considered to have one of the top bats this year in Latin America, though he'll likely move off the position, either to a corner outfield spot or possibly third base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2011, 01:46:20 pm
There's supposedly a more complete scouting report on Acosta for paid subscribers if one of them would be so kind......
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 02, 2011, 01:52:20 pm
We have a signing:


It's like draft day all over again....Hoping for a top pitcher or two

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2011/07/cubs-sign-top-dominican-ss-prospect-enrique-acosta/

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 02, 2011, 02:04:26 pm
BA projected Acosta to have the 9th highest international signing bonus.

9.    LUIS ENRIQUE ACOSTA, SS

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

B-T: R-R Ht.: 6-1 Wt.: 180

Acosta, who is represented by Rob Plummer, has one of the best bats in the Dominican Republic. Acosta, 16, has a short load and gets his hands started easily with a clean, efficient swing and good bat speed. He has a good approach to hitting for his age and uses the whole field. Some scouts say his swing is shorter than Ronald Guzman's and Elier Hernandez's and that he has more power as well. He gets good extension and the ball jumps off his bat. He could have more pop once he learns to incorporate his lower half into his swing. He does have a tendency to open his hips early, leaving him susceptible to breaking balls. Acosta's speed, range, hands, arm and accuracy will force a position switch. Some scouts think Acosta has an outside chance to handle third base, though many believe he's a corner outfielder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 02, 2011, 02:06:36 pm
We have a signing:

$1.1M for a 16 year old Dominican player would seem to be a relatively significant signing, hopefully meaning there is some real talent there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 02, 2011, 02:32:05 pm
$1.1M for a 16 year old Dominican player would seem to be a relatively significant signing, hopefully meaning there is some real talent there.

Didn't someone post some approximations for what a dollar amount signing in the Dominican equates to as for a round in the draft?  Anyone recall what it is?  I think i recall dollar value being a round or two lower that what a drafted prospect would get.

My hope is they take at least a non trivial portion of that 50 million coming off the books this off season and spend it in the next few weeks.  Wish they would sign about 10 worthwhile million dollar guys.  Seems like it would be more economical in the long run than blowing it on a couple of replaceable free agents.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2011, 04:03:52 pm
Texas is nabbing many of the big names. They just got the biggest prize Ronald Guzman.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2011, 09:51:19 pm


Jackson: 3-4, 2B,  RBI, 2 BB

Vitters: 3-6, 3 RBI, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_02_cmcaax_tenaax_1


Ha: 3-5, 2 2B, 2 RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_02_dbcafa_dunafa_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_02_peoafx_burafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 02, 2011, 10:06:05 pm
Jackson busts out of it just as Byrd comes back.  Sigh.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 02, 2011, 10:06:29 pm
Except for Castro, Barney, and Campana, trade or release all of the position players and bring up the farmhands - Colvin, Jackson, Szczur, Ha, Flaherty, Vitters, LeMahieu, Bour, Clevenger, and Castillo.

Couldn't be any worse than what we have now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 02, 2011, 10:49:03 pm
Jackson hit .187 in May and .217 in June.  I don't think he should spend a lot of time worrying about what's happening in Wrigley Field.  I think he's got enough to do worrying about his own game.  Hopefully he can get things going and sustain some hitting for a while. 

He's riding his longest hitting streak since April, with a 3-game hitting streak.  He didn't have back-to-back two-hit games in either of those two months, I don't think.  NOw he's had three straight.  Hopefully he's ready to get things going again.  And obviously he's always been very hot-and-cold streaky, but I think all of us are hoping that his extended slump may be more a reflection of playing hurt than that it's the type of slump he'll go through every year.  We'll see. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 02, 2011, 10:51:52 pm
Ben Wells getting clobbered again at Boise. 

But Brian Smith with 5 no-hit innings in his start for Mesa.  He hasn't himself allowed any earned runs in his three starts.  But in his first start he tired and allowed two singled in the 4th before getting pulled, and having a reliever allow them both in. 

Obviously any lefty who can throw 85 and get a curve over can dominate at that level, and I've heard nothing about his stuff.  But I'll be interested to hear something about whether he's got any velocity or projection. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2011, 11:00:28 pm
Lemahieu: 3-5, 2 RBI

Colvin: 3-5, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_02_nozaaa_iowaaa_1


Sanchez: 1-3, 1st pro HR, 2 RBI, BB, K, E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_02_dcurok_dtwrok_1


Candelario: 2-4, BB, E, 2 CS

Arcila: 2-4, 2B, RBI, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_02_dblrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2011, 11:41:54 pm
Geiger: 3-4, 2 2B, RBI

Hernandez: 2-4, RBI, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_02_cubrok_rngrok_1

Hoilman: 0-4, 4 K, E

Wells: 4-6-5-4-1-1, 3 WP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_02_boiasx_yakasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 03, 2011, 10:15:16 am
This was evidently from yesterday or Friday, so who knows?

http://twitter.com/#!/CarlosValmore/status/87230376656896000 (http://twitter.com/#!/CarlosValmore/status/87230376656896000)

Translation: Marck Malave signed for 7 digits by the Cubs, highlighting his offensive potential, because he can hit for power with both hands.

---------
BA had him as their #8 guy on their list of projecting signing bonuses.  A lot of big-dollar signings were reported, so the fact that his wasn't makes it sound iffy whether this is really correct.  Blocky switch-hitting catcher.  From BA's report, he's got a really strong throwing arm.  But the rest of their report was kind of what he isn't:  slow, not projectible, raw defensively other than throwing, iffy whether he's quick/agile enough to catch, questionable bat speed, not as good LH as RH. 

But if he's got a premium arm, and is very strong, I'm not always sure about the "bat speed" stuff.  It sounds great when guys are said to have it, but Corey and Kelton and Pie it didn't seem to always help much.  Maybe not being scouted as having good bat speed doesn't mean everything. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 03, 2011, 10:29:50 am
This was evidently from yesterday or Friday, so who knows?

http://twitter.com/#!/CarlosValmore/status/87230376656896000 (http://twitter.com/#!/CarlosValmore/status/87230376656896000)

Translation: Marck Malave signed for 7 digits by the Cubs, highlighting his offensive potential, because he can hit for power with both hands.

---------
BA had him as their #8 guy on their list of projecting signing bonuses.  A lot of big-dollar signings were reported, so the fact that his wasn't makes it sound iffy whether this is really correct.  Blocky switch-hitting catcher.  From BA's report, he's got a really strong throwing arm.  But the rest of their report was kind of what he isn't:  slow, not projectible, raw defensively other than throwing, iffy whether he's quick/agile enough to catch, questionable bat speed, not as good LH as RH. 

But if he's got a premium arm, and is very strong, I'm not always sure about the "bat speed" stuff.  It sounds great when guys are said to have it, but Corey and Kelton and Pie it didn't seem to always help much.  Maybe not being scouted as having good bat speed doesn't mean everything. 


I googled his name and found references of him signing on a couple other message boards but nothing confirmable from any sort of news outlet.  He sounds less than impressive, however.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 03, 2011, 10:43:27 am
He sounds less than impressive, however.

Fit right in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 10:45:09 am
Malave is typical of the problems with signing some DR prospects.  He was taken under the control of an "agent" in the DR and was trained specifically in the tools that scouts look for,  ie arm strength, bat speed, etc, but was not allowed to compete in the top leagues down there.  Thus he is not trained in the fundamentals of baseball, and there is no way for scouts to evaluate his ability to actually play the game.

As someone said above, there are a lot of prospects, many of them Cub prospects that had great bat speed, great power, etc, but failed.

This is not to say that we should never sign such prospects.  I would rather have a prospect who MIGHT make it than a prospect that CAN NOT make it.  It just means that a prospect like that has to be signed with a great many more "unknowns" as far as scouting is concerned, than prospects that have been seen in live games with live pitching.

Anyway, If we got him, I am glad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2011, 10:56:59 am
According to this guy, Malave had an agreement to sign with Toronto and they were waiting to confirm it.

http://twitter.com/#!/iGranadillo/status/87018233437241345
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 03, 2011, 11:48:43 am
Malave is typical of the problems with signing some DR prospects.  He was taken under the control of an "agent" in the DR and was trained specifically in the tools that scouts look for,  ie arm strength, bat speed, etc, but was not allowed to compete in the top leagues down there.  Thus he is not trained in the fundamentals of baseball, and there is no way for scouts to evaluate his ability to actually play the game.

As someone said above, there are a lot of prospects, many of them Cub prospects that had great bat speed, great power, etc, but failed.

This is not to say that we should never sign such prospects.  I would rather have a prospect who MIGHT make it than a prospect that CAN NOT make it.  It just means that a prospect like that has to be signed with a great many more "unknowns" as far as scouting is concerned, than prospects that have been seen in live games with live pitching.

Anyway, If we got him, I am glad.

I've read that was how it was with a lot of guys down there...do any of the prospects that the agents take under their wings compete in a league setting, or is that strictly how it is?  Bad that i mean training for tools, and no game experience against competition.

According to this guy, Malave had an agreement to sign with Toronto and they were waiting to confirm it.

http://twitter.com/#!/iGranadillo/status/87018233437241345

that sucks...i saw on the toronto board on realgm when i googled earlier they had signed a couple and had shown interest in him, but the guy on that board said that the Cubs had signed Malave.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2011, 11:58:58 am
but the guy on that board said that the Cubs had signed Malave.

There is confusion over this, perhaps because the sources so far all need to be translated from Spanish. I'm waiting for Ben Badler to confirm one way or another. He's been reporting all the signings for BA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 03, 2011, 12:04:04 pm
After reading this, I'd have to say the Rangers are nuts for giving Mazara 5 million.

The Rangers have signed Dominican outfielder Nomar Mazara. Terms were not immediately available, but ESPN's Enrique Rojas reports that the bonus is expected to be around $5 million, which would be a new record for an international amateur, surpassing the $4.25 million the Athletics spent on Michael Ynoa in 2008.

Mazara, who is 6-foot-3, 185 pounds, is a 16-year-old lefty with the best raw power in Latin America. A $5 million price tag was rumored throughout the industry leading up to July 2, leaving many international scouting directors stunned that any team would pay that price. ESPN also reported that the Rangers will likely sign Dominican righthander Pedro Payano, who like Mazara is also represented by Ivan Noboa, for a bonus of $500,000-$600,000.

Here is part of Baseball America's scouting report on Mazara from yesterday:

"He may have the most raw power in Latin America, with batting practice shots that leave scouts in awe. He employs a big leg kick and generates good weight transfer in BP with excellent loft and backspin. He has a projectable body with lanky limbs on a large, strong frame. The only thing that can match Mazara's epic power are his equally epic ability to rack up strikeouts.

Mazara, who is represented by Ivan Noboa, doesn't play in any of the major leagues that have popped up in the Dominican Republic and has been showcased judiciously. Several scouts have said Mazara showed up at workouts, took BP then left without facing live pitching. Those who have been seen him in games say his hit tool is nowhere near as advanced as his power. He has a massive leg kick that works for him in BP when he's in a rhythm, but it can be difficult for him to maintain his balance and timing. He's a corner outfielder with an average arm, but any team that signs him will be banking on his bat."

The Rangers today also spent $3.5 million on another lefthanded 16-year-old Dominican outfielder, Ronald Guzman, widely considered one of the top hitters in Latin America.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 03, 2011, 12:06:34 pm
Although the Rangers are taking the approach i wish the cubs would take in investing a lot of money in latin america.  It's the same as free draft picks if you invest your money a little more judiciously.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 03, 2011, 01:24:55 pm
According to this guy, Malave had an agreement to sign with Toronto and they were waiting to confirm it.

http://twitter.com/#!/iGranadillo/status/87018233437241345

Bummer, that's too bad.  I thought the shot at a rocket-armed switch-hitting power source who was rated as possibly among the top ten Latin prospects was really exciting.  A sure winner, of course not, no sure things.  But the more good prospects, the better.  I'm disappointed to miss out. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 01:30:36 pm
Ray - not all DR prospects are controlled by these agents.  But some of the most promising are.

According to the article I read, there are top pitching prospects down there that american scouts have never seen pitch against a live batter.  The same goes for position prospects that have never been seen in the field, or against a live pitcher.  Mulave seems to be one of these.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 01:33:50 pm
My boy Hoilman is learning that that power and the willingness to take walks are not enough for immediate stardom.  Although his OBA is well over 400, his BA is closer to 230, and his strikeouts are substantial.  With all his tools, if he doesn't learn to make contact with breaking pitches, he isn't going to go far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 03, 2011, 01:41:57 pm
Been going over the signings on Baseball America, and one thing i've noticed, is why aren't the more successful clubs spending big money in Latin America?  There are no Yankees, Red Sox, Rays or Phillies, tho the Braves did sign a couple of high dollar outfielders, and i do realize the Rays don't really have the money after all the comp picks in the draft.  So far the teams that have signed high dollar deals according to Baseball America are the Cubs, KC, Detroit, St. Louis, Atlanta, Minnesota, Mets, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, San Diego and Houston.  It seems its been more the smaller market teams signing the high dollar Latin bonus babies.  Where are the Yankees and Red Sox?

 Nomar Mazara, OF, Dominican Republic – Signed with Texas, reportedly for a record-breaking bonus around $5 million

• Ronald Guzman, OF, Dominican Republic – Texas, $3.5 million

• Elier Hernandez, OF, Dominican Republic – Kansas City, $3.05 million

• Enrique Acosta, SS, Dominican Republic – Chicago Cubs, $1.1 million

• Dorssys Paulino, SS, Dominican Republic – Cleveland, $1.1 million

• Jose Ruiz, C, Venezuela – San Diego, $1.1 million
• Harold Ramirez, OF, Colombia – Pittsburgh, $1.05 million
 
• Jose Garcia, C, Venezuela – New York Mets, bonus unconfirmed, reportedly sandwich-round type money
 
• Adelin Santa, 3B, Dominican Republic – Detroit, $750,000
 
• Miguel Gonzalez, RHP, Dominican Republic – Minnesota, $650,000
 
• Dewin Perez, LHP, Colombia – St. Louis, $450,000
 
• Iosif Bernal, OF, Panama – Atlanta, $230,000
 
• Arturo Michelena, SS, Veneuela – Houston, $220,000
 
• Jose Godoy, C, Venezuela – St. Louis, $200,000
 
• Francisco Miguel, OF, Dominican Republic – Cleveland, $200,000
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 03:00:35 pm
Ray - I believe that both the Yankees and the Red Sox have been players in the Latino market in past years.  I suspect that their absence so far this year is just a matter of the law of averages.

Also, I believe that they have generally concentrated on the best prospects and have not bothered with the lesser ones.  (I am not certain of this).  It may have been that they were just out bid on the few they considered worth signing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 03:01:31 pm
Does anyone have any idea how much Castro signed for with the Cubs, and whether or not he was considered one of the top prospects of his signing year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2011, 03:03:20 pm
Quote
Does anyone have any idea how much Castro signed for with the Cubs, and whether or not he was considered one of the top prospects of his signing year?

$60K

And no, he wasn't considered an elite prospect. Just a good one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 03:05:45 pm
Damb.  The Cubs must be the smartest organization in baseball.  Obviously Jeff has been wrong.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: fredr on July 03, 2011, 03:12:30 pm
Evan Crawford @ Daytona has been pretty consistant all year, any info on him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 03:31:59 pm
Extremely fast (Campana-like fast).  Little power (Campana-like power).  Better fielder than Campana.  Poorer contact than Campana, at least until this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 03, 2011, 04:30:06 pm
Bruce Miles:

The Cubs have sent pitcher Hayden Simpson, their No. 1 pick from last year, from Class A Peoria back to Mesa. Simpson has had a rough go of it this year, and they felt sending him out every five days to take his lumps in the Midwest League was unfair. So they’ll let him regroup in Mesa. His stuff has been short, and I’m told he looks out of gas as he came into this season weakened from a bad case of mono last fall.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 03, 2011, 04:35:59 pm
Bruce Miles:

The Cubs have sent pitcher Hayden Simpson, their No. 1 pick from last year, from Class A Peoria back to Mesa. Simpson has had a rough go of it this year, and they felt sending him out every five days to take his lumps in the Midwest League was unfair. So they’ll let him regroup in Mesa. His stuff has been short, and I’m told he looks out of gas as he came into this season weakened from a bad case of mono last fall.

I think at this point, thats prolly best thing they can do...I feared an arm injury was on the horizan and his mechanics getting out of whack from his compensating for lack of strength.  6 months of mono means he probably didn't feel better till close to spring training which means he didn't have a ton of time to recover after getting healthy.  Let him spend the summer getting his strength and stamina back and let him start fresh next year, or in winter ball and find out what he can do...it was obvious Peoria wasn't working.  He needed a change for the sake of change.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2011, 07:11:59 pm
Ha: 3-5, 2 RBI, K, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_03_dbcafa_dunafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 03, 2011, 07:48:56 pm
Been going over the signings on Baseball America, and one thing i've noticed, is why aren't the more successful clubs spending big money in Latin America?  There are no Yankees, Red Sox, Rays or Phillies, tho the Braves did sign a couple of high dollar outfielders, and i do realize the Rays don't really have the money after all the comp picks in the draft.  So far the teams that have signed high dollar deals according to Baseball America are the Cubs, KC, Detroit, St. Louis, Atlanta, Minnesota, Mets, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, San Diego and Houston.  It seems its been more the smaller market teams signing the high dollar Latin bonus babies.  Where are the Yankees and Red Sox?

Necessity is the mother of invention.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 03, 2011, 08:03:00 pm
Necessity is the mother of invention.

But money is the end all be all....or at least where those prospects are concerned.  Guess when you can sign any free agent you want, why worry bout spending more than you have to developing them.  They may have done some studies and realized you don't get much return on the high dollar guys.  Or maybe they led the way in signing high dollar guys and came to the same realization.  I'm curious if there are any studies out there by young enterprising sportswriters on how the to ten prospects fair from year to year.  And, yeah, I realize i'm just talking out my rear.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 03, 2011, 08:04:39 pm
Necessity is the mother of invention.

That is one adage which is quite obviously not true.  I offer the Chicago Cubs as Exhibit A.  Case closed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 03, 2011, 08:05:25 pm
But money is the end all be all....or at least where those prospects are concerned.  Guess when you can sign any free agent you want, why worry bout spending more than you have to developing them.  They may have done some studies and realized you don't get much return on the high dollar guys.

Generally meaningful innovation does come from those who are not dominating the scene.  The expression that necessity is the mother of invention is strongly rooted in truth.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 03, 2011, 08:15:34 pm
Generally meaningful innovation does come from those who are not dominating the scene.  The expression that necessity is the mother of invention is strongly rooted in truth.

JeffH argued with ya on that....i agree with you that is a true statement...I was just wondering why the big name clubs weren't outbidding the smaller clubs earlier, when, if they consider the prospects worthwhile, they would have no trouble..  I've actually been googling success rates of high dollar latin american signings last few minutes but haven't found anything.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 03, 2011, 08:20:35 pm
I can't even find a list of latin american baseball signings by a certain year, such as 2003, or 2005...i could figure up my own success rate.  I'm just curious about this now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 08:44:20 pm
Both the Yankees and the Red Sox have developed a lot of young talent over the years.  And it has come both from the draft and from overseas signings.  A big difference is that both of them also had enough cash to get the top players as free agents and also trade for expensive players.  Even the Cubs could have signed a few more players with another 70 million dollars in their payroll.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 03, 2011, 09:55:20 pm
Dave, an added 70M still would not have put them in the territory of the Yankee payroll.  The Cubs would have needed to double their payroll for that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 10:00:11 pm
I was referring to the smallest payroll, that of the Red Sox, which I believe is a little under 200 million, about 70 million lower than the Cubs.

If I had referred to the higher of the two payrolls, some lousy nit-picker like CurtOne would have pointed out that I was skewing the figures just in order to support my position.

Who would I be able to blame if Curtone were not on the board.  I suppose there is always the snot nosed brat, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 03, 2011, 10:14:36 pm
Del Valle throws another three inning hitless stint, walkiin 2 and striking out 8.

In his treee starts, he has gone 8 innings, giving up 1 hit.  eleven strike outs and three walks.

I suspect he will be heading to Peoria before too long.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2011, 10:22:00 pm

Flaherty: 3-6, 2 2B, 2 RBI, K

Vitters: 2-5, 2B, 2 K

McNutt: 4-1/3 -10-5-5-1-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_03_cmcaax_tenaax_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_03_cliafx_peoafx_1


Jackson: 8-1/3 IP, 1 R

Lemahieu: 2-3, SF, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_03_nozaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 03, 2011, 10:43:35 pm
McNutt has been horrible this month.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 03, 2011, 10:45:54 pm
Wasn't he hurt a few weeks ago?  Hurt more than we thought?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 03, 2011, 10:46:14 pm
McNutt has been horrible this month.

He'll be joining Whitenack soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 03, 2011, 11:14:56 pm
http://www.baseball-fever.com/archive/index.php/t-101808.html (http://www.baseball-fever.com/archive/index.php/t-101808.html)

Go way to the bottom, claims the Cubs *did* sign the switch-hitting catcher Malava, for $1.5.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2011, 11:50:26 pm
Golden: 0-4, 3 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_03_boiasx_yakasx_1

Zapata left after the 1st inning.

Hernandez: 3-4, 2 2B, RBI

Amaya: 2-5, 3B

Geiger: 2-4, RBI, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_03_cubrok_brrrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 04, 2011, 12:17:42 am
Down On The Farm's 

Mid-season Organizational All-Star Team

Left Field
Bryan LaHair (Iowa)
Honorable Mention: Evan Crawford (Daytona)

Centerfield
Matt Szczur (Peoria)
Honorable Metion: Brett Jackson (Tennessee)

Right Field
Jae-Hoon Ha (Daytona/Tennessee)
Honorable Mention: Matt Spencer (Tennessee)

Third Base
Greg Rohan (Peoria)
Honorable Mention: Ryan Flaherty (Tennessee)

Shortstop
Marwin Gonzalez (Tennessee/Iowa)
Honorable Mention: Junior Lake (Daytona/Tennessee)

Second Base
D.J. LeMahieu (Tennessee/Chicago/Iowa)
Honorable Mention: Matt Cerda (Daytona)

First Base
Justin Bour (Daytona)
Honorable Mention: Rebel Ridling (Tennessee)

Catcher
Steve Clevenger (Tennessee/Iowa)
Honorable Mention: Welington Castillo (Iowa/Chicago)

Right-Handed Pitcher
Nick Struck (Daytona/Tennessee)
Honorable Mention: Marco Carrillo (Tennessee/Iowa)

Left-Handed Pitcher
Austin Kirk (Peoria)
Honorable Mention: Eric Jokisch (Peoria)

Closer
Frank Batista (Daytona)
Honorable Mention: Rafael Dolis (Tennessee)


http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/07/cubsminors70411.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Chicagocubsonlinecom+%28ChicagoCubsOnline.com%29&utm_content=Twitter
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 04, 2011, 07:04:58 am
http://www.baseball-fever.com/archive/index.php/t-101808.html (http://www.baseball-fever.com/archive/index.php/t-101808.html)

Go way to the bottom, claims the Cubs *did* sign the switch-hitting catcher Malava, for $1.5.   

I'm surprised Malava got so much after reading his scouting report.  I had thought he would come in under Acosta because his ceiling seemed lower, yet he seems to be one of the higher bonused guys.  I'm guessing the scouting report doesn't do him justice or the Cubs just saw him on his good days.  Either way, whether they succeed or fail, I'm happy for any signings over the week that shows Ricketts wasn't just talking out of his rear about building up the farm.  You have to move in that directions before you can reap any benefits.   I'd like to see the cubs win a world series while my pa is still alive to enjoy it with me, so they need to get going.

Does anyone know what the biggest bonus the Cubs have ever paid to a latin guy is?  Seems like the bigger dollar foreign guys have been from the far east.  Know Choi was 1.2m and Ryu was 1.6m but i'm struggling to recall any million dollar latin guys.  I realize they've always went for quantity over quality there, but there seems like there has to be some big dollar flameouts I can't recall.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brs2 on July 04, 2011, 07:10:40 am
Most I remember was for Larry Suarez at $850K. Alfredo Francisco was around half a million, which I think was the largest Latin American signing bonus at the time. I had such high hopes at the time.... 16 year olds are such a c r a p shot; I think I prefer the quantity over quality approach now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 04, 2011, 08:26:20 am
Most I remember was for Larry Suarez at $850K. Alfredo Francisco was around half a million, which I think was the largest Latin American signing bonus at the time. I had such high hopes at the time.... 16 year olds are such a c r a p shot; I think I prefer the quantity over quality approach now.


I do too for the most part.  I think it's best option because, with all the agent's influence, you really don't know what you're getting.  If they actually played in competitive leagues, i'd prefer the other way because a star is worth at least 2 or 3 average players in my book.  Those guys can be replaced with relative ease whereas a star can not.  However, I still would like to see the Cubs get a few million plus guys every year.

The one thing that kept sticking out to me as i went through past lists of the more coveted latin american guys is how low a percentage of them actually made it big.  Nevertheless, It's nice to have some guys you know have the necessary tools for success at the major league level to root for as they wind their way through the Cubs non-development system.

Also, It's nice to see Ricketts followed through on saying he was gonna commit more money to latin america....very nice to see actually.

I actually remember y'all talking about Alfredo Fransisco on here and someone posting something from Arizona Phil when he came to arizona instructs...to be such a well thought of prospect, that guy went absolutely no where.  He has to be one of the more horrible signings among high dollar prospects in the last decade.  I don't think that guy ever got out of A ball. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 04, 2011, 09:01:53 am
Some BA quotes.  Not sure how far in advance the following was written:


Quote
Baseball America wrote:
The two top-paid catchers in Latin America this year are expected to be a pair of Venezuelans: Jose Ruiz and Marck Malave. Ruiz, who has been tied to the Padres, has a projectable 6-foot-2, 180-pound frame, is an advanced defensive catcher and has shown projectable raw power. There is debate among scouts about his bat, but most scouts have said his hitting will need time to catch up to his defense. Malave's thicker frame doesn't have as much projection as Ruiz's, but he is a switch-hitting catcher with a strong arm. Malave had been linked to the Reds for much of the spring, but international sources more recently have connected the Cubs to Malave.


The following last week:
Quote
From Ben Badler's team-by-team preview for July 2nd:
Baseball America (http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/prospects/international-affairs/2011/2612029.html) wrote:
HIGH ROLLERSThese teams should have the biggest international budgets this year. The High Rollers section is more crowded than usual this year, with 10 teams that have a good chance at handing out at least one seven-figure bonus.Chicago Cubs: We'll have to wait a decade to know how well each team did with its 2010 international signings, but the early returns for the Cubs have been outstanding. Dominican third baseman Jeimer Candelario is playing like an MVP candidate in the Dominican Summer League, Venezuelan shortstop Carlos Penalver has an OBP over .400 in the DSL and Venezuelan outfielder Jeffrey Baez is among the DSL leaders in hits, stolen bases and runs. This year the Cubs' target appears to be Marck Malave, a switch-hitting catcher from Venezuela, and they'll likely be active for other Latin and Pacific Rim players as usual. They have also been linked to Dominican catcher Eric Otanez, and with two DSL teams and a Rookie-level Arizona club, they would have the roster space to pull it off.BA also has a list of the top 40 prospects by expected signing bonus. Here are the Cubs' targets from that link:
Baseball America (http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/prospects/international-affairs/2011/2612022.html) wrote:
8.   MARCK MALAVE, CVENEZUELAB-T: B-R Ht.: 6-1 Wt.: 200Malave drew widespread notice in October 2008, when he was the youngest player on Venezuela's 14-and-under-team as a 13-year-old along at the COPABE Pan American championship, where he was teammates with righthander Victor Sanchez and 2010 signings Adonys Cardona (Blue Jays) and Rougned Odor (Rangers). Malave batted .467 (7-for-15) with a homer, two doubles and a walk in the tournament, spending time as a catcher and an infielder. Now 16, Malave trains with Ciro Barrios as a full-time catcher.Malave's arm might be his best tool. He has a short arm stroke and delivers plus throws consistently with great carry. Scouts who like Malave see him as a catcher who can hit from both sides of the plate, but not everyone is sold on his bat. He's a better hitter from the right side, with questions about his bat speed from both sides of the plate, as the ball jumps off his bat due to his strength rather than his bat speed. He'll have to make mechanical adjustments in pro ball. Malave is strong, but his thick, boxy body raises questions about his projection and isn't the athletic frame that many scouts look for in young catchers. His below-average speed wouldn't an issue as a catcher, but his lack of athleticism and experience are evident in his receiving, so he's not a lock to stick behind the plate. Malave was connected to the Reds, who have signed a slew of Barrios' players, but now most international sources believe Malave will end up with the Cubs.

[/size][/color][/font]
[/size][/color]

[/color]
[/color][/size][/color][/size][/size][/color][/size][/color][/size][/font]
Quote

Quote:
9. LUIS ENRIQUE ACOSTA, SSDOMINICAN REPUBLICB-T: R-R Ht.: 6-1 Wt.: 180Acosta, who is represented by Rob Plummer, has one of the best bats in the Dominican Republic. Acosta, 16, has a short load and gets his hands started easily with a clean, efficient swing and good bat speed. He has a good approach to hitting for his age and uses the whole field. Some scouts say his swing is shorter than Ronald Guzman's and Elier Hernandez's and that he has more power as well. He gets good extension and the ball jumps off his bat. He could have more pop once he learns to incorporate his lower half into his swing. He does have a tendency to open his hips early, leaving him susceptible to breaking balls. Acosta's speed, range, hands, arm and accuracy will force a position switch. Some scouts think Acosta has an outside chance to handle third base, though many believe he's a corner outfielder.
Quote:
The scouting consensus is that 6-foot-1, 180-pound Enrique Acosta will have to move off shortstop, but the 16-year-old has one of the more promising bats in the Dominican Republic. Scouts are split on what they like the most about Acosta's offensive game. Some say he has a clean swing with a good approach, while others are drawn more to the way the ball jumps off his bat. He has a quick swing and uses the whole field. His defense needs refinement. He might be able to handle third base, but most scouts see him as a corner outfielder.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 04, 2011, 09:08:57 am
How many successful homegrown OFers have the Cubs produced over the last decade?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 04, 2011, 09:17:10 am
I think all of the above comments tough on the way scouting reports get written and the uncertainties that come with 16-year-olds. 

Malava hasn't been catching forever.  Will he be mobile enough and improve enough behind the plate to actually block and catch Marmol sliders?  Who knows?  He's got a 16-year-old's swing that might need some adjustments when he's facing Marmol-type sliders and Roy Halladay-caliber pitching.  Not surprising.  I think they always write these things up to have some of both sides:  what's attractive and why he's likely to appeal enough to get a top-ten bonus.  But also why he might eventually fail.  So that if he does fail, they can later note that there were concerns about his defense, or his bat speed, or his hitting mechanics.  But if the guy is already big and "boxy" enough so that he doesn't need to be projected, and if he already has present power in which the ball "jumps off his bat", maybe it's not hard to see him hitting the HR's that drive OPS.  And if he's got this awesome shut-down throwing arm, that's certainly a skill that isn't easily taught. 

Heh heh, if BA's sources had him #8, and the Cubs valued him to the tune of $1.5, it's fun to hope that they all know what they're talking about, and that the notable plusses will play out and the uncertainties will be resolved in time or else be modest limitations. 

On the other guy, there are questions as well.  Reference to "outside chance" to play 3B, and "most scouts see him as a corner OF", so who knows?  If that's the case, then it's a given that he's going to need to hit and hit for power.  Hopefully he will. 

The other guy, 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 04, 2011, 09:20:59 am
Acosta actually reminds me a lot of Baez(edit-actually after rereading over Baez, think i may have been wrong there).  Of course, i've just read scouting reports and seen neither play, so they could be totally different.  I still wonder a little bit about Malava, but, for the most part, I'm happy with the type of prospects the Cubs seem to be targeting this year.

Great scouting info Craig.  Thanks.  Do you have a subscription to baseball america?  I was actually debating on offering to get one if the board wanted to created a BA topics section for pertinent articles to be copies and pasted.  Then when mine ran out after 6 months or a year or whatever time frame people would agree on, someone else could get one then it could just rotate.  Would sorta be the same as everyone going in together for one after however many years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 04, 2011, 11:20:53 am
ray, I had the same feeling, that Acosta generally profiles somewhat like Baez:  value is a potentially excellent pure bat with bat speed and possible power.  Present SS who won't stay there, is possible for 3B, and may end up in corner OF. 

Baez's defense seemed to profile more favorably:  some think he can stick at SS, whereas that doesn't seem to be true for Acosta.  For Baez 3B seems conservative, and 2B seems possible, whereas for Acosta even 3B sounds like it's possible but unlikely. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 04, 2011, 12:10:46 pm
This following questions are things i should know, but this stuff i usually skimmed over looking for prospect news when the board talked about it. 

1.  Isn't there a cap on how many internationals/latin american guys clubs can get visas for in a one year time period?

2.  Do the latin guys generally play in the dsl league until their 18ish birthday?  I know they can sign them at 16 with July 2nd resetting the calender year, but what age are they legally able to bring a guy over at?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2011, 12:48:24 pm
If you include Cuba in Latin American signings, Silva got one million to sign with the Cubs.  But if I remember right, he was the first Latino the Cubs gave a million dollars to.  this year they already added two more.

In Korea, there were Choi and Ryu.  I don't think that Lee got a million.  I think the recent pitcher, Kim, might have gotten a million.

Of course, the biggest overseas signing of them all was that of Fukudome.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 04, 2011, 01:08:54 pm
Of course, the biggest overseas signing of them all was that of Fukudome.

And also, of course, when you look at Fukudome and Castro, the amount of the signing bonus is not necessarily a great indication of the quality of the player/prospect.  About the only thing it clearly indicates is how willing the team is to part with its money.  Willingness to part with money, particularly when it is repeated often enough, will frequently return some excellent talent, but is not a strong indication with any given signing that someone is going to amount to much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 04, 2011, 01:15:55 pm
Blue Jays have given the top confirmed bonus among the infielders this year at 1.3 million to Dawel Lugo.  He is yet another guy listed at shortstop that can not play the position.  Most expect him to play 3b.  I'm not sure any domican shortstop can actually play the position...at least this year
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 04, 2011, 01:21:36 pm
RHP Nick Struck has reportedly been promoted to Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 04, 2011, 01:23:40 pm
Struck stats

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t553&t=p_pbp&pid=572177
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2011, 01:24:22 pm
And when you look at Pujols and Harvey, you see that the position in the draft is not necessarily a great indication of quality.  But I would rather have 20 first round picks, than 20 14th round picks, just as I would rather have twenty players that were deemed by the scouts to be worth a million dollars each, than I would have 20 players that were deemed by the same scouts to be worth 70 thousand dollars each.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 04, 2011, 02:58:57 pm
I would rather have twenty players that were deemed by the scouts to be worth a million dollars each, than I would have 20 players that were deemed by the same scouts to be worth 70 thousand dollars each.

Deemed by scouts from which franchise?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2011, 03:28:59 pm
"20 players that were deemed by the same scouts"

It would have to be the same frranchaise, since I specified the evaluation was by the "same scouts"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 04, 2011, 05:28:06 pm
I think you missed my point, Dave.

Think about it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 04, 2011, 05:40:21 pm
If a Chicago Cubs scout were to write a report on an amateur player with a recommendation of "pass", heaven and earth should be moved to sign that player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 04, 2011, 06:11:59 pm
Larry Suarez moves from Peoria to Daytona

Team   League   W   L   ERA   G   GS   CG   SHO   SV   IP   H   R   ER   HR   BB   SO   GO/AO   AVG
PEO   MID   0   0   0.00   10   0   0   0   1   16.0   13   5   0   1   5   23   1.25   .210
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 04, 2011, 06:16:04 pm
Sorry about that alignment - my computer is still not right

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t450&t=p_pbp&pid=521650
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 04, 2011, 06:29:27 pm
Larry Suarez moves from Peoria to Daytona

Team   League   W   L   ERA   G   GS   CG   SHO   SV   IP   H   R   ER   HR   BB   SO   GO/AO   AVG
PEO   MID   0   0   0.00   10   0   0   0   1   16.0   13   5   0   1   5   23   1.25   .210

Is there a quick link to a scouting report for him?  Was curious because i figured he had to have halfway decent stuff to get the bonus he got.  Googled his name and all i really found were statistics...as bad as his numbers have been, at least there was a progression of a rising strikeout rate and lowering walk rate from year to year for the most part.  BABIP has also lowered each of last few years from insanely high to about average this year so sort of makes me hopeful he may turn into a solid reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2011, 07:27:52 pm
Kirk with a no hitter through 6 innings.  2 walks and 6 strike outs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2011, 08:04:42 pm
Kirk with a no hitter through 7.  2 walks and 9 strike outs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2011, 08:17:56 pm
Kirk with a no hitter through 8.  2 walks, 10 strike outs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 04, 2011, 08:29:09 pm
Kirk completes the no-no. 101 pitches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 04, 2011, 08:32:23 pm
Kirk: 9-0-0-0-2-10

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_04_cliafx_peoafx_1


Suarez: 1-2-2-2-0-0, HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_04_tbyafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 04, 2011, 08:34:37 pm
Marcus Hatley was promoted to AA taking Struck's place.

According to the Peoria Journal Star, Hayden Simpson reportedly topped out in the mid-80's during his final start for the Chiefs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 04, 2011, 08:47:30 pm
Kirk completes the no-no. 101 pitches.

Did Scotty beam him up?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 04, 2011, 09:28:27 pm
Kirk completes the no-no. 101 pitches.

No-hitters are always nice.

He has a 2.60 ERA, and before tonight's game the league was only hitting .204 against him.  After 15 starts and more than 90 innings, might be a decent time to promote him for the rest of the season.  http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=571853

Kirk turned 21 just more than a month ago, and, in looking at his stats you see that the year he was drafted, 2009, he apparently signed late enough that he only got 8 innings in the Arizona instructional league and then 5 innings in Boise... giving little enough look at him that he started 2010 back in Boise, spending most of the season there until a late promotion to Peoria and just 12+ innings there before the end of the season.

That meant that this year he started back in Peoria.

If he had been signed earlier, sent to Boise early enough to get a real look at him there in 2009 and to get some real experience there that year, he might well already be in Daytona or with the Smokies.

Not that slow signings really make any difference or anything, because, after all, we're only talking about a little more than two months.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2011, 10:22:20 pm
It is also possible that if they had signed him right away, he might have played most of the 2009 season at Arizona, tore up his rotator cuff, and never pitched again.  Delaying the signing could be the best thing that happened to both Kirk and the Cubs.

Possible.

Or-----

He could have looked so good last season that the Rays would have insisted that the Cubs include him in the trade for Garza, instead of Archer.

Possible.

It may be too small a sample size to really prove one way or another,
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 04, 2011, 10:49:35 pm
One player is almost always too small a sample size to "prove" much of anything.

The USE of one player, however, can illustrate a point.  And for that Kirk does the job pretty well.  So does Vitters.  Of course, common sense would also illustrate the point that aside from the absolute top prospects, most are going to start in Boise, or in the Arizona Instructional League, and they are going to start there whether they sign the day after the draft or the last day for signing.  The big difference is that if they sign quickly and spend a month or more in Boise, and do well,  it makes it relatively easy for the Cubs to feel comfortable in assigning him to Peoria or Daytona the first full season after the draft, but if he signs late and is at Boise for less than two weeks, it makes it very unlikely he will be anyplace other than Boise to start that first full season after the draft.

That means that signing a player close to the deadline may only mean a "bit more than two months" on the calendar, but it can and often will mean a full season of development.

Again.  Kirk is not offered to "prove" anything, but to instead illustrate it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 04, 2011, 11:05:23 pm
While it's always preferable to sign your draftees right away, it's not always cost-effective. A more generous first offer often won't get the deal done, but it will insure that the final price is higher than it otherwise would have been. When real-world budgets are involved, this strategy would probably result in fewer signings.

That extra guy or two who doesn't sign with the Cubs will almost surely make it the Hall of Fame. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2011, 11:07:58 pm
No one disputes that it is better to sign a prospect early, rather than late, all things being equal.

But all things are not equal.  I suspect if it were your money going to the prospect, you would try to get the best deal for your team and for yourself.  If not, it wouldn't be your money very long.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 04, 2011, 11:17:12 pm
Kirk doesn't illustrate anything. Claiming he could've started this season in Daytona or AA if he had signed a whole month earlier is pure conjecture.

He was 19 at the beginning of last season, and it wouldn't be a surprise if the Cubs didn't want him throwing 130 innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 04, 2011, 11:25:37 pm
Lemahieu: 2-4, 2B, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_04_iowaaa_orhaaa_1

Jackson: 0-3, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_04_tenaax_monaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 04, 2011, 11:38:45 pm
Marck Malave -- Switch-hitting catcher with good power potential?

I'm on board.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2011, 12:03:24 am
Hoilman: GW-ing HR bottom of 10th ; 1-2, HR, RBI, 2 BB, E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_04_yakasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 05, 2011, 01:31:04 am
Man, that Hoilman is good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 05, 2011, 06:56:25 am
It's been a pretty disappointing year for performances on the farm, but it's great to see guys like Kirk and Struck step up this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 05, 2011, 07:07:22 am
Kirk.... was 19 at the beginning of last season, and it wouldn't be a surprise if the Cubs didn't want him throwing 130 innings.

A very important point.

Now, let me ask three questions.

1) Is there some number of innings less that 130 which might have been more desirable than 130?

2) Once a player is signed, does the team which signed him control the number of innings he pitches?

3) If a player is not YET signed, and trying to keep in shape in independent leagues, or simply playing pickup games, does the team which drafted him control the number in innings he pitches?


While it's always preferable to sign your draftees right away, it's not always cost-effective. A more generous first offer often won't get the deal done, but it will insure that the final price is higher than it otherwise would have been.

Not necessarily.  The approach I have suggested is to make a reasonable/generous offer immediately, and to let the draftee know that after an initial time interval to review and consider the contract, and to perhaps discuss some provisions around the edges, the offer will decline by a stated amount after each additional stated period, that the team will NOT raise the offer after the initial period allowed to review and consider the contract and that the team is perfectly willing to let him re-enter the draft the next year.  Establish that as your clear procedure, well-known to prospects, and you are not going to have final contract prices higher than an initial reasonable/generous offer.  How would this work?  You offer a kid $750K, and let him know that after one week that offer falls to $725K, and $700K after two weeks, etc.  Or have the offer drop $2K a day, or some similar approach.  To make clear the team meant it, the team would likely need to allow at least a couple of reasonably well-followed prospects to remain unsigned, but drafting a few more overslots than the team ever really intended to sign would allow that pretty simply without really losing anything in a draft.


No one disputes that it is better to sign a prospect early, rather than late, all things being equal.

Not quite true.  Chris, even if no one else (and I believe there has been, though my memory sips thru a straw), has argued that it makes no difference.... which is not quite the same as "better... all things being equal."


But all things are not equal.  I suspect if it were your money going to the prospect, you would try to get the best deal for your team and for yourself.

And quickly getting the prospect in uniform, taking team instruction, and under team control, is part of getting the best deal for the team.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2011, 08:09:33 am
Jes, why do you assume missing a month or two in rookie ball right after the draft somehow stunts the growth of a prospect?

Even those who sign late get instructional league coaching. And as I said before, if they show they're ready next spring, they'll get into a full season league anyway, save for the young pitchers the club don't want to extend too much their first year.

Take Shelby Miller, one of the best pitching prospects around. He signed late, pitched all of 3 innings, but got 24 starts in his first full year and now is in AA.

Take your example of Kirk. Even assuming he pitches in full-season last year, he probably isn't any higher than Daytona right now. Is he hurt by being in Peoria rather than Daytona right now? It's not a race to make it to the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 05, 2011, 08:51:08 am
Jes, why do you assume missing a month or two in rookie ball right after the draft somehow stunts the growth of a prospect?    ....Take Shelby Miller, one of the best pitching prospects around. He signed late, pitched all of 3 innings, but got 24 starts in his first full year and now is in AA.

And, as you point out, Shelby Miller is "one of the best pitching prospects around."

Mark Prior and Steve Strasburg never sniffed short season rookie league baseball.  No team would need to send them there to get a good handle on whether they could handle that level of play.  Those guys are on different levels entirely, but even with them, if they sign late, they likely are delaying by close to a season the time when they arrive in the majors.

It's not a race to make it to the majors.

Actually, it is.  A player is generally only able to perform at a major league level to a certain age (which certainly varies from player to player, but all within a broad range), and he generally (catchers might be an exception) is not going to extend that age by sitting out one season.

Getting players ready to produce more quickly at an effective major league level one season earlier would represent a considerable advantage to a franchise, just as doing it one season later would represent a considerable disadvantage.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2011, 09:09:47 am
Quote
And, as you point out, Shelby Miller is "one of the best pitching prospects around."

Which goes to my point. Players who are ready for full season the next year will prove it in spring training and be put there.

Prior and Strasburg were special, but there were also college pitchers. Many college pitchers start their first year in full season even if they sign late.

Quote
Actually, it is.  A player is generally only able to perform at a major league level to a certain age (which certainly varies from player to player, but all within a broad range), and he generally (catchers might be an exception) is not going to extend that age by sitting out one season.

Now you're just being silly. Not playing two months in rookie ball---common amongst high picks--is not going to shorten a player's career.

You didn't answer my question re: Kirk. Is he suffering for pitching in Peoria rather than Daytona right now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 05, 2011, 09:45:46 am
Kirk no-hitter story from the Peoria paper

http://www.pjstar.com/sports/chiefs/x1722639758/Chiefs-Kirk-pitches-no-hitter
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 05, 2011, 09:56:20 am
Which goes to my point. Players who are ready for full season the next year will prove it in spring training and be put there.

It will take much more in spring training to "prove" being ready for full season ball than it would if the player approached league average in rookie ball for two months immediately after signing.  Perform at league average in rookie ball for two months after signing and the next season will be in low A, or, with an outstanding spring in high A.   Miss rookie ball entirely, and the assignment will be to rookie ball the first full season after the draft unless the spring training performance truly stands out.

Not playing two months in rookie ball---common amongst high picks--is not going to shorten a player's career.

If it removes a season from the front end of a player's career, yes, it has shortened the career.  Losing a season from the front end of a career does not translate into adding a productive season on the back end.


You didn't answer my question re: Kirk. Is he suffering for pitching in Peoria rather than Daytona right now?

Yes.  He probably is.

He is now doing well enough in Peoria that a mid-season promotion is likely to come soon.  If he were performing as well in Daytona as he is in Peoria, then the mid-season promotion would be to AA, which would easily put him in the running for the major league staff in 2012.  As it is, assuming he continues to progress well, his major league arrival would be 2013.

Time after time we have discussed here the importance of repetition, the importance for most players of getting in a certain amount of minor league experience to be ready for the majors, the importance of actually learning the game, as well as developing pitch recognition for hitters and repeatable mechanics for pitchers.

Losing the two months right after the draft means effectively losing that season of development.

Would it necessarily mean Kirk reaches the majors more quickly?  Of course not.  He may never reach the majors at all.  We are talking about probabilities, and losing that season of development certainly matters regarding the age when a prospect is most probable to reach the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2011, 11:05:20 am
Quote
It will take much more in spring training to "prove" being ready for full season ball than it would if the player approached league average in rookie ball for two months immediately after signing.

All the prospects who do otherwise disagree with you.

Quote
If it removes a season from the front end of a player's career, yes, it has shortened the career.

Where is the proof that it removes a season from the front of a player's career?

Quote
If he were performing as well in Daytona as he is in Peoria, then the mid-season promotion would be to AA, which would easily put him in the running for the major league staff in 2012.

A mid-season promotion to AA this year would easily put Kirk on track to be in the majors next year? Okay. You're really pushing the limits to make supposed probabilities more like certainties.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 05, 2011, 11:22:46 am
Has anyone seen anything official on the Malave signing?  All i've been able to find it on is message boards.  Baseball America doesn't even list it on their list of signings.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/july-4-international-signings-roundup/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 05, 2011, 11:25:39 am
Making a take it or leave it offer, no matter how reasonable you feel it is, will sometimes work on college players with few options (which is why most of them sign quickly), but is not likely to work well on most high school prospects who have the option of going to college and getting much higher draft spot in two years.

And, it would blow the hell out of your budget.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 05, 2011, 12:20:10 pm
Making a take it or leave it offer, no matter how reasonable you feel it is, will sometimes work on college players with few options (which is why most of them sign quickly), but is not likely to work well on most high school prospects who have the option of going to college and getting much higher draft spot in two years.

And, it would blow the hell out of your budget.

Exactly, I still don't understand why have this argument, because it just isn't as simple as offering the guy the money it takes to get them signed on august 15th.   The Cubs would have to offer them a lot more to get them in now because the agents and players are holding out for more money.

And even if you meet every guys asking price this year and get them all in early.  Not only have you spent an extra 3-10 million bucks, or maybe more, who knows?  But next year, agents are going to ask for more than the Cubs draft choices got this year, because it is their job to get as much as they can for their client and they know the Cubs will pay it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 05, 2011, 12:21:28 pm
Exactly, I still don't understand why have this argument...

Ray, have you met jes?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 05, 2011, 12:26:43 pm
Notes:
1.  Lemahieu has played exclusively 3B since going down to Iowa.  I suspect the 3B/2B split at Tenn was due to Vitters.  And the all-3B usage now if due to Aram and Barney. 

2.  Thanks for Kirk article.  Emphasizes spotting/locating fastball, but that yesterday the curve was good and in his previous poor games it wasn't.  We knew he was a location/curveball guy, of course.  But no real hints there about how good his fastball really is. 

3.  Darvill has tied his career high with 4 XBH. 

4.  Charles "Lee Smith" Thomas has a nice 0.00 ERA, but has walked 8 in 6.2 innings.  Actually, his first outing was perfect. So in his last four appearances, he's got a groovy 8 walks-3 hits-4.2 innings line.  His ability to load them but strand them seems pretty good thus far. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 05, 2011, 12:31:49 pm
Exactly, I still don't understand why have this argument...

Ray, have you met jes?

haha  yeah, and i do agree with him it would be advantageous to get them in as soon as possible, but its just not feasible without draft slotting.

Either way, there is still arizona instructs in the fall where they'll get things to work on there and over the winter.  Plus with the arms, a lot were ridden hard during their respective seasons, and could probably use a break.  I find myself repeating arguments others have made, but only because i agree with them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 05, 2011, 01:00:15 pm
Has anyone seen anything official on the Malave signing?  All i've been able to find it on is message boards.  Baseball America doesn't even list it on their list of signings.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/july-4-international-signings-roundup/

I haven't seen anything official either.  I would like to. 

That said, the Red Sox guy seemed to have some confident sources.  And I think the Cubs have not tended to publicize these kinds of signings.  In past I don't recall the Cubs announcing Suarez or Contreras, and there being some uncertainty both about whether they really had and about how much they'd actually paid. 

So I'm hoping/assuming that they probably really did sign him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 05, 2011, 01:02:14 pm
And, it would blow the hell out of your budget.

Walk me thru that, because I do not understand it at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2011, 01:10:02 pm
Quote
And I think the Cubs have not tended to publicize these kinds of signings. 

I don't believe any of the teams are announcing these signings. They want the paperwork all taken care of before it's official. It's been BA or some foreign sources that've been announcing them
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 05, 2011, 01:56:43 pm
Walk me thru that, because I do not understand it at all.

you do not think it would cost a good bit extra to get all these players in early?  That would imply every team in major league baseball lets a great deal of their draft picks go to the deadline before signing them for no reason whatsoever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 05, 2011, 02:25:08 pm
Having been in the negotiating business most of my adult life, it seems rather obvious to me, but I will try it.

The job of the agent is to get the most money possible for his client (and himself).  The job of the team is to pay the least amount possible, in order to free up money for other signings (not even the Yankees have an unlimited budget.

Suppose the agent feels that there is a good chance that he can get two million dollars, but feels that he will go as low as 1.5 million if he has to.  And the team feels that there is a good chance that they can get the player to sign for 1 million, but would pay as high as 1.5 million if they have to.  If they offer 1.5 million up front, the agent will hold out until the end in order to see if he can get additional money.  If the agent asks 1.5 million up front, the team will hold out until the end to see if they can buy for less.  Not only good negotiation technique, but also human nature.

In your scenario, if the team immediately offers 1.5 million, take it or leave it, the agent will not believe the ultimatum, and will not immediately accept.  And when he finally comes down to the 1.5 offer, the team will have already taken it off the table, or will lose all credibility.  So the team will lose several signable prospects.

But free enterprise is at play here.  When you buy the Cubs, you can use any negotiation technique you want.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 05, 2011, 04:44:58 pm
saw this on baseball america while keeping a vigil for new latin signings.  Off work for 2 weeks so have nothing better to do with my days.  lol

It is lists for the 10 youngest players in each league...I am pasting only the lists that include Cub players.  Not sure how much it interests anyone, but I thought i t was interesting so here it is.  Was surprised that Starlin came in at number 2 in the national league.  It is possible that i missed someone, but do not think i did.

National League

1    Jordan Lyles    Houston Astros    10/19/90    MLB
2    Starlin Castro    Chicago Cubs    03/24/90    MLB
3    Brad Hand    Florida Marlins    03/20/90    MLB
4    Mike Stanton    Florida Marlins    11/08/89    MLB
5    Ruben Tejada    New York Mets    10/27/89    MLB
6    Freddie Freeman    Atlanta Braves    09/12/89    MLB
7    Jason Heyward    Atlanta Braves    08/09/89    MLB
8    Anthony Rizzo    San Diego Padres    08/08/89    MLB
9    Madison Bumgarner    San Francisco Giants    08/01/89    MLB
10    Rubby De La Rosa    Los Angeles Dodgers    03/04/89    MLB

Pacific Coast League

1    Brett Lawrie    Las Vegas 51s    01/18/90    AAA
2    Hector Sanchez    Fresno Grizzlies    11/17/89    AAA
3    Matt Dominguez    New Orleans Zephyrs    08/28/89    AAA
4    Mike Montgomery    Omaha Storm Chasers    07/01/89    AAA
5    Neil Ramirez    Round Rock Express    05/25/89    AAA
6    Maikel Cleto    Memphis Redbirds    05/01/89    AAA
7    Pedro Hernandez    Tucson Padres    04/12/89    AAA
8    Alexi Amarista    Salt Lake Bees    04/06/89    AAA
9    Marwin Gonzalez    Iowa Cubs    03/14/89    AAA
10    Alberto Cabrera    Iowa Cubs    10/25/88    AAA

Northwest League

1    Rougned Odor    Spokane Indians    02/03/94    SS
2    Jorge Alfaro    Spokane Indians    06/11/93    SS
3    David Perez    Spokane Indians    12/20/92    SS
4    Victor Payano    Spokane Indians    10/17/92    SS
5    Hanser Alberto    Spokane Indians    10/17/92    SS
6    Ben Wells    Boise Hawks    09/10/92    SS
7    Richard Alvarez    Spokane Indians    08/14/92    SS
8    Chuckie Jones    Salem-Keizer Volcanoes    07/28/92    SS
9    Vicente Campos    Everett AquaSox    07/27/92    SS
10    Johnny Barbato    Eugene Emeralds    07/11/92    SS

And the link for any interested....
http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/whos-the-youngest-in-each-league-midseason-edition/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 05, 2011, 04:54:02 pm
work?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 05, 2011, 05:05:09 pm
Wow, Alberta Cabrera has some of the worst whip's and era's for a prospect i've ever seen to be so aggressively promoted...Also has an unimpressive k/9 to go with his equally unimpressive w/9...my only question concerning the aggressive promotion schedule is why?  It makes no sense, but, i figure if anyone knows, it would be someone here.  Or perhaps someone in the cubs front office, but since i shan't be asking them any time soon, i pose the question to the Bleacher Bums.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 05, 2011, 05:07:33 pm
work?

yeah, going from having near 60 hrs/week of my time accounted for to none is more of a struggle than i believed it to be.  I don't see how people do it.

edit---yeah, that was said with a touch of sarcasm, but i have been bored out of my mind.  hehe
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 05, 2011, 05:18:19 pm
Can I borrow twenty dollars?

I don't know anybody else that actually works.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 05, 2011, 05:22:01 pm
sure...i'm gonna have to send it to you through my nigerian accounts though, and with exchange rates you might have to put some up first, but everything will be returned to you, plus the extra you asked for.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 05, 2011, 06:33:43 pm
I've emailed you my bank account number and my PIN.  I'm sure you can handle things from there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 05, 2011, 06:37:25 pm
Can I borrow twenty dollars?

I don't know anybody else that actually works.

I thought you said you were going to put your wife to work now that you are retired.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 05, 2011, 06:43:55 pm
I've emailed you my bank account number and my PIN.  I'm sure you can handle things from there.

I could have if there had actually been any money in your account...sorry, without the proper fees, you'll be getting no 20 bucks from me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 05, 2011, 06:47:50 pm
I could have if there had actually been any money in your account...sorry, without the proper fees, you'll be getting no 20 bucks from me.

She didn't approve of that plan. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 05, 2011, 06:54:12 pm
Another great outing for Angel Guzman.  Pretty soon they might even let him go three innings.
 
Player           IP  H  R  ER  BB  SO  HR  ERA
Guzman, A  2.0  0   0  0     0     2    0  1.17
Harman       0.0  0   0  0     0     0    0  0.00
 
It will be interesting to see what Casey Harman does.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 05, 2011, 08:11:08 pm
....it just isn't as simple as offering the guy the money it takes to get them signed on august 15th.   The Cubs would have to offer them a lot more to get them in now because the agents and players are holding out for more money.  And even if you meet every guys asking price this year and get them all in early.  Not only have you spent an extra 3-10 million bucks, or maybe more, who knows?  But next year, agents are going to ask for more than the Cubs draft choices got this year, because it is their job to get as much as they can for their client and they know the Cubs will pay it.

It is not a matter of "meeting the draftee's price" any more than it is a matter of the draftee meeting the team's price.  The approach I have suggested would not have a team spending an extra $3-10M.  It would have offers made, with the offer declining the longer the draft pick waited.  If the guy wanted to wait another year for the chance to sign, he could, knowing injury could end his prospect status, that there would me no assurance he would do better the next year, and that meanwhile it would all take him at least another year to begin his pro career, or to get a nice boost to his wallet.

there is still arizona instructs in the fall where they'll get things to work on there and over the winter.  Plus with the arms, a lot were ridden hard during their respective seasons, and could probably use a break.

Instructional leagues are just that.  It is not seriously competitive play, and for good prospects they are not likely to be matched against other players at the same level.  I will agree that for some pitching prospects, the delay may well be desirable, because it is easy to put too many innings on a young arm in one season and to cause serious injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2011, 09:50:27 pm
Szczur: 3-4, BB

Peralta: 5-2-1-1-1-6



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_05_cliafx_peoafx_1



It will be interesting to see what Casey Harman does.


You might not want to read the boxscore.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_05_tbyafa_dbcafa_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 05, 2011, 09:55:19 pm
Harman's performance was a mixed result.  He did very good against 6 opponents, and very bad against 10 other opponents.

After all, he didn't allow every of the 10 opponents that got on base against him.  Only 7 scored.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2011, 10:05:02 pm
Jackson: 2-3, 2 HR, 2 RBI, 2 BB

Vitters relegated to the 8th spot in the order.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_05_tenaax_monaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2011, 10:19:49 pm
Marwin Gonzalez loves the PCL: 3-5, 2B, 3B

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_05_iowaaa_orhaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 05, 2011, 10:22:02 pm
Gonzalez has a higher slugging percentage than Vitters, and is right in about the same slugging percentage area as Jackson.  Slightly over 1/3 of his hits have been for XB, so he's not quite Theriot/Barney. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2011, 03:16:58 am
Hoilman: 3-5, 2B, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_05_yakasx_boiasx_1


Mesa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_05_cubrok_angrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2011, 05:44:24 am
Piece on Boise Hawk Luis Lira:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/07/06/1716602/liria-learning-on-the-mound.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2011, 05:47:03 am
Esmailin Caridad and Rafael Dolis to the DL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 06, 2011, 08:27:16 am
It is not a matter of "meeting the draftee's price" any more than it is a matter of the draftee meeting the team's price.  The approach I have suggested would not have a team spending an extra $3-10M.  It would have offers made, with the offer declining the longer the draft pick waited.  If the guy wanted to wait another year for the chance to sign, he could, knowing injury could end his prospect status, that there would me no assurance he would do better the next year, and that meanwhile it would all take him at least another year to begin his pro career, or to get a nice boost to his wallet.

Instructional leagues are just that.  It is not seriously competitive play, and for good prospects they are not likely to be matched against other players at the same level.  I will agree that for some pitching prospects, the delay may well be desirable, because it is easy to put too many innings on a young arm in one season and to cause serious injury.

Your idea is good in theory, but most likely we would be signing very few of our draft picks, and would get permission to redraft none of them.

What percentage of our top ten non college senior draft picks do you think we would be able to sign using your method?  I guess usually we get about 90% now?  I'd be surprised if we even got 50% doing that and i'm thinking much less.  You are right there is the chance of injury returning to college, or going to college for the high school guys, but young guys always think that stuff will never happen to them, so i'm not sure thats the deterrent you think it is.

I'll agree that competitive play is better than instructs for most, but for young guys new to the system, perhaps instructs is more important so they can work on their swings, and fundamentals, and that is why organizations have fall instructs rather than fall competitive games.  It seems one would be as easy to arrange as the other in some form or capacity.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 06, 2011, 09:04:44 am
A not all that positive report on Justin Bour

http://www.thefriendlyblogfines.com/2011/07/cubs-prospect-report-justin-bour.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 06, 2011, 09:33:11 am
Your idea is good in theory, but most likely we would be signing very few of our draft picks, and would get permission to redraft none of them.

For the truly top draft picks, if they don't sign, I believe you get a comp pick in the next draft.  As to permission to redraft, there are always plenty of new prospects out there in later drafts.  Not getting permission to redraft the same guy would not be a meaningful hit.

But you are right that all I have suggested is an idea which is an untried theory.  The only way you find out if theories work is to test them.

Something tells me that the current Cub approach has been "tested" long enough to be considered a failure and to warrant some change.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 06, 2011, 09:38:42 am
The only thing not positive was pointing out that he utterly s*cks against LH pitching.

The one area for concern seems to be Bour’s ability against lefties. While most left-handed sluggers do tend to struggle against lefties, Bour has had an incredibly rough time this year, sitting at about a .500 OPS for the year against them.

Sounds like a platoon firstbaseman/DH/PH.  Still could have good value, though a .500 OPS against LH pitching would pretty clearly limit him to platoon use.  It would be interesting to know the sample size in that, and to know whether he has never hit LH pitching or if this is strictly a factor of sample size.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 06, 2011, 09:44:29 am
Cubs agree with Mark Malave and Ricardo Marcano

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/cubs-agree-to-terms-with-mark-malave-ricardo-marcano/ (http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/cubs-agree-to-terms-with-mark-malave-ricardo-marcano/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 06, 2011, 09:46:21 am
Bruce Miles talks with Oneri Fleita

http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20110705/sports/707059774/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 06, 2011, 10:12:41 am
30. RICARDO MARCANO, 3B VENEZUELA

B-T: L-R. Ht.: 6-2 Wt.: 180
 
Marcano's name popped up more as international scouting directors have said he has one of the better lefthanded swings on the market. He played well at a showcase in Venezuela run by Major League Baseball in April, and some scouts believe he has the potential to hit for average and power. His body and swing remind some in Venezuela of Victor Martinez. Whether he remains in the infield remains to be seen. An average runner, Marcano will need work on defense, as his hands and feet aren't ideal for third base. His arm also isn't strong, though it could improve. Some scouts have looked at his body and thought about him behind the plate, though he could also end up in left field.
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 06, 2011, 11:27:40 am
For the truly top draft picks, if they don't sign, I believe you get a comp pick in the next draft.  As to permission to redraft, there are always plenty of new prospects out there in later drafts.  Not getting permission to redraft the same guy would not be a meaningful hit.

But you are right that all I have suggested is an idea which is an untried theory.  The only way you find out if theories work is to test them.

Something tells me that the current Cub approach has been "tested" long enough to be considered a failure and to warrant some change.

You are correct, if you do not sign any of you top 3 picks, you get an extra pick the next year.  However, the rest you just lose.  If you do not sign your "make up" pick the following year, you lose it as well.

I present a scenario.  August 14th arrives and you have yet to sign any of your top ten picks because they're doing what prospects do, they're holding out for the best deal they can possibly get.  You would honestly not up their offer?  You would rather lost basically an entire draft than have your picks start the next year? 

I understand your going to say you have given them an ultimatum, and some would have taken it.  That may be true for college seniors with no options, but considering the draft has not traditionally worked that way, i doubt very seriously many agents are going to take you seriously or advise their clients who have options to take that first offer and sign.

Would you just not sign any of your top ten picks in that given draft year to prove you are serious?  I do agree the next year you may get 2 or 3 to take your first offer and they would get their career started a year earlier, but it seems like your giving up an awful lot for very little reward.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 06, 2011, 01:02:27 pm
Cubs agree with Mark Malave and Ricardo Marcano

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/cubs-agree-to-terms-with-mark-malave-ricardo-marcano/ (http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/cubs-agree-to-terms-with-mark-malave-ricardo-marcano/)

Quote
30. RICARDO MARCANO, 3B VENEZUELA

B-T: L-R. Ht.: 6-2 Wt.: 180
 
Marcano's name popped up more as international scouting directors have said he has one of the better lefthanded swings on the market. He played well at a showcase in Venezuela run by Major League Baseball in April, and some scouts believe he has the potential to hit for average and power. His body and swing remind some in Venezuela of Victor Martinez. Whether he remains in the infield remains to be seen. An average runner, Marcano will need work on defense, as his hands and feet aren't ideal for third base. His arm also isn't strong, though it could improve. Some scouts have looked at his body and thought about him behind the plate, though he could also end up in left field.


Wow, great to see Malava officially confirmed, and even more fantastic to see another potential plus hitter signed.  Ricketts really meant it about the procurement commitment.  People have had a lot of complaints about him, but I've got to say he might be getting it right on the most important choice of all and the choice where he's equipped to decide. 


He's not equipped to scout, or make GM decisions, but he is equipped to decide whether it's more strategic to spend extra millions on procurement or on a veteran big-league player.  He may be a dope or all the bad things that deeg and JBN complain about.  But if the money being funneled into procurement leads to some good major league players, that decision might override everything else. 


If that's how he's thinking, though, I've got to admire the patience.  Because it's going to be a whole lot of years before these 16-year-old Latin kids or 18-year-old HS draftees are going to start winning big-league games, much less championships.  So that's some pretty admirable long-term planning/building, in my view.  We could go through a couple of managers and GM's and Ricketts could go through a whole lot of net and radio mocking before that pays off, but I think it might be the best way to eventually become good and more than jes's "just competitive", given where we're starting from. 


Anyway, exciting, and should be fun to watch. 


I also continue to be encouraged about the pursuit of some potential middle-of-the-order hitters.  I know Ron and PlayTwo have talked about the value of an alert defensive player like Barney, and fairly so.  But while a winning lineup can have a variety of players with different types of offense, it's really hard to make it without some middle-of-the-order guys around which the supporting players can orbit.  Having two such, Lee and Aram, kept the Cubs in the mix for a bunch of years.  But we've really got to line some up.  It's fun to have some names who were at least drafted/signed with that possibility in mind. 
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 06, 2011, 01:13:32 pm

Wow, great to see Malava officially confirmed, and even more fantastic to see another potential plus hitter signed.  Ricketts really meant it about the procurement commitment.  People have had a lot of complaints about him, but I've got to say he might be getting it right on the most important choice of all and the choice where he's equipped to decide. 


He's not equipped to scout, or make GM decisions, but he is equipped to decide whether it's more strategic to spend extra millions on procurement or on a veteran big-league player.  He may be a dope or all the bad things that deeg and JBN complain about.  But if the money being funneled into procurement leads to some good major league players, that decision might override everything else. 


If that's how he's thinking, though, I've got to admire the patience.  Because it's going to be a whole lot of years before these 16-year-old Latin kids or 18-year-old HS draftees are going to start winning big-league games, much less championships.  So that's some pretty admirable long-term planning/building, in my view.  We could go through a couple of managers and GM's and Ricketts could go through a whole lot of net and radio mocking before that pays off, but I think it might be the best way to eventually become good and more than jes's "just competitive", given where we're starting from. 


Anyway, exciting, and should be fun to watch. 


I also continue to be encouraged about the pursuit of some potential middle-of-the-order hitters.  I know Ron and PlayTwo have talked about the value of an alert defensive player like Barney, and fairly so.  But while a winning lineup can have a variety of players with different types of offense, it's really hard to make it without some middle-of-the-order guys around which the supporting players can orbit.  Having two such, Lee and Aram, kept the Cubs in the mix for a bunch of years.  But we've really got to line some up.  It's fun to have some names who were at least drafted/signed with that possibility in mind.
I totally agree with your points, craig.  Just a clarification of what I like about Barney.  I admire a player that understands the strategy of baseball, a thinking man's player.  Someone who makes it a point to consider the specifics of a situation and acts accordingly, putting the team first.  And someone who  is focused and therefore makes the routine plays in the field.  I believe that these qualities, not all of which are quantifiable, have been undervalued by the Cubs' "braintrust" over the years.  I would simply like to see these qualities given their due consideration along with OBP, OPS, etc.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 06, 2011, 01:15:29 pm
I just hope he doesn't stop with player procurement, and pays more attention to player development as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 06, 2011, 01:32:15 pm
Player development has been horrible for the past 50 years, especially for position players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2011, 01:48:12 pm
Dave Caplan:

Quote
Other baseball execs are also paying attention to the Cubs willingness to upgrade their farm system both in players and in facilities with one current executive stunned that he saw Tom Ricketts on multiple trips to the Dominican Republic. Another executive put it this way: "The Ricketts family is sure putting their money where their mouth is. They said that they want to build a tremendous farm system and this is the right way to go about doing it. There are a lot of very envious organizations that wish they had the level of commitment that the Cubs do," a former GM who is now a major league scout told me.

The Cubs are quietly going about their negotiations with their draft picks and I hear that they could have at least one of their Top 5 draft picks signed this week. In fact, third round pick Zeke DeVoss, an outfielder from Miami was at Wrigley Field on Sunday taking batting practice before the series finale with the White Sox and could ink his deal shortly. Top choice Javier Baez is also expected to sign fairly soon while 2nd round choice Daniel Vogelbach may take a while. He is weighing a commitment that he made to play baseball at the University of Florida and it will take a very substantial offer to convince him to pass up college.


http://www.csnchicago.com/07/06/11/Kaplan-Cubs-agree-to-deals-with-intl-pro/kapman_article.html?blockID=539516&feedID=619
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 06, 2011, 01:50:03 pm

Wow, great to see Malava officially confirmed, and even more fantastic to see another potential plus hitter signed.  Ricketts really meant it about the procurement commitment.  People have had a lot of complaints about him, but I've got to say he might be getting it right on the most important choice of all and the choice where he's equipped to decide. 


He's not equipped to scout, or make GM decisions, but he is equipped to decide whether it's more strategic to spend extra millions on procurement or on a veteran big-league player.  He may be a dope or all the bad things that deeg and JBN complain about.  But if the money being funneled into procurement leads to some good major league players, that decision might override everything else. 


If that's how he's thinking, though, I've got to admire the patience.  Because it's going to be a whole lot of years before these 16-year-old Latin kids or 18-year-old HS draftees are going to start winning big-league games, much less championships.  So that's some pretty admirable long-term planning/building, in my view.  We could go through a couple of managers and GM's and Ricketts could go through a whole lot of net and radio mocking before that pays off, but I think it might be the best way to eventually become good and more than jes's "just competitive", given where we're starting from. 


Anyway, exciting, and should be fun to watch. 


I also continue to be encouraged about the pursuit of some potential middle-of-the-order hitters.  I know Ron and PlayTwo have talked about the value of an alert defensive player like Barney, and fairly so.  But while a winning lineup can have a variety of players with different types of offense, it's really hard to make it without some middle-of-the-order guys around which the supporting players can orbit.  Having two such, Lee and Aram, kept the Cubs in the mix for a bunch of years.  But we've really got to line some up.  It's fun to have some names who were at least drafted/signed with that possibility in mind. 
 

Best part is there are still high dollar talented guys out there waiting to be signed.....It's probably to much to hope that we get more than what we've already signed, considering it's already more than we've gotten in the past combined, but i'm hoping he isn't done yet. 

The Latin signings may be a small gesture, but to me its a big deal i'm hoping it's a sign of things to come.  And, hopefully it means he's serious about signing Dillon Maples and the others that were taken of his ilk I initially gave little chance of getting signed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 06, 2011, 02:11:27 pm
Eric Otanez, who the Cubs were reported to be involved with, signed with Tampa Bay.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/rays-sign-dominican-catcher-eric-otanez/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 06, 2011, 02:24:54 pm
I present a scenario.  August 14th arrives and you have yet to sign any of your top ten picks because they're doing what prospects do, they're holding out for the best deal they can possibly get.  You would honestly not up their offer?  You would rather lost basically an entire draft than have your picks start the next year?

Yes.  As I have said, the approach the Cubs have been using certainly has not been working, and for the first three picks, you would get comp picks the next year, so your scenario would only be losing picks in rounds 4-10.

If I were GM, I would also sit down after that and seriously re-evaluate the offers made, because it would seem that at least a few of them were not high enough, and I would keep that in mind the next year.  If I were the owner, I would sit down and re-evaluate the GM, who had apparently done a poor enough job of scouting the players and evaluating what it would take to sign them.   But, yes, I would stick to it.  After the first year, draft picks the second year would understand that the approach was serious and you likely would end up signing roughly the same percentage of picks as the Cubs now end up signing.


I understand your going to say you have given them an ultimatum, and some would have taken it.  That may be true for college seniors with no options, but considering the draft has not traditionally worked that way, i doubt very seriously many agents are going to take you seriously or advise their clients who have options to take that first offer and sign.

They would certainly take it seriously the second year.


Would you just not sign any of your top ten picks in that given draft year to prove you are serious?

Already addressed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 06, 2011, 02:26:43 pm
Why do you say the approach the Cubs are taking is not working?  It is essentially the same approach as every other team.  It must be working for someone.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2011, 02:34:14 pm
Rhee: 5-6-6-5-4-6

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_06_tbyafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 06, 2011, 02:56:00 pm
Vogelbach is weighing his commitment, eh?

Wonder if that pun was intended?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 06, 2011, 03:16:59 pm
Yes.  As I have said, the approach the Cubs have been using certainly has not been working, and for the first three picks, you would get comp picks the next year, so your scenario would only be losing picks in rounds 4-10.

If I were GM, I would also sit down after that and seriously re-evaluate the offers made, because it would seem that at least a few of them were not high enough, and I would keep that in mind the next year.  If I were the owner, I would sit down and re-evaluate the GM, who had apparently done a poor enough job of scouting the players and evaluating what it would take to sign them.   But, yes, I would stick to it.  After the first year, draft picks the second year would understand that the approach was serious and you likely would end up signing roughly the same percentage of picks as the Cubs now end up signing.


They would certainly take it seriously the second year.


Already addressed.

You only get those comp picks one time.  If you do not sign him the second year, you lose the pick.  So, those picks do still count toward the ten.

There is on way to make your system work, and i think you touched on it a little when you said it is the gm's job to talk to the potential draftee's about their asking price, and that is to overdraft guys.  A guy destined for the second round would be happy to take first round money and sign quickly.  Hayden Simpson would be an example of a guy like this.  If you want your gm to determine the best guy who would sign for a certain amount of money, overdrafting is basically what you would be doing.  Guys aren't going to come off their price pre draft because they are giving up leverage.  Personally, i would rather have the superior talent you have to haggle with until the signing deadline and meet somewhere in the middle.

Plus, (and this is speculation by me, but it is what i would do) i would imagine most guys would artificially inflate their price to the cubs because they would rather be taken by a team that would come closer to meeting their asking price.  Either way, the truly elite talent would never make it into the cubs organization, and that is the point of having a minor league organization...to develop quality talent.

There are a lot of smart guys in baseball.  If this system worked, it's hard to believe someone would not be employing it by now.  I also doubt it hasn't been tried before either.  There are very few ideas that haven't already been thought of and tried in some form or fashion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 06, 2011, 04:00:02 pm
(Ricketts is) not equipped to scout, or make GM decisions, but he is equipped to decide whether it's more strategic to spend extra millions on procurement or on a veteran big-league player.  He may be a dope or all the bad things that deeg and JBN complain about.  But if the money being funneled into procurement leads to some good major league players, that decision might override everything else.

It does appear he may be doing as he said he would, and if so, that will be great.

Your comment on what he is not equipped to do is right, but if the team takes that approach, and develops a broad and deep pool of young talent as a result, then you no longer need to rely on "brilliant" GM decisions or a great deal of luck.  You will have expanded the window of opportunity enough, and in a manner that should keep that window open long enough, that even the hapless Cubs should be able to stumble thru to sustained success.


Someone who makes it a point to consider the specifics of a situation and acts accordingly, putting the team first.  And someone who  is focused and therefore makes the routine plays in the field.

While it is nice for a player to have "baseball smarts," it is also important for coaches to take every opportunity to keep the players focused.

True enough that when a pitcher is struggling and hasn't gotten the ball over the plate for the last 10 pitches and has walked the bases full that it is incredibly stupid for a hitter, particularly one without much power, to swing at the first pitch, even if it is right down the pipe.

And we can all grouse about that and complain that the guy is an idiot... but what of the coaches or the manager who did not remind the player of this right before he went to the plate, or even as he left the dugout.

Coaches and managers bear a great deal of responsibility for any failure of players or an entire team to keep its head in the game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2011, 09:22:11 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 3 K

Beeler: 7 IP, 3 R


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_06_tenaax_monaax_1

Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_06_belafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2011, 10:06:28 pm
Struck AAA debut: 5-1/3 -6-2-2-4-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_06_iowaaa_orhaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 06, 2011, 11:29:23 pm
After going hitless yesterday in his debut, Easterling singled in his first AB tonight. 

And got picked off. 

He singled on his second AB as well.  The box score isn't clear to me whether he got picked off or thrown out stealing this time.   

The stuff that Cubs are made of. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2011, 11:34:38 pm
Golden: 3-5, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_06_yakasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 06, 2011, 11:41:59 pm
Simpson totally overmatched at Mesa. 
Colin Richardson had an ERA of 12+ with a WHIP around 3 at Mesa, so he gets promoted to Boise and picks up the win with two good innings. 

Hunter Ackerman 6K/0BB/2H in 4.2, he's is not overmatched at Mesa.  He's been very good.  8/2 GO/AO, weakens his stats (had been 5.33 coming in).  But he did give up a solo HR.  He's been a pleasant surprise this month. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2011, 11:51:35 pm
Simpson: 2-1/3 -5-5-2-0 , WP, Balk , ( 10 BB - 5 K last 5 outings )

Easterling: 3-3, BB, 2 CS

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_06_cubrok_giarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2011, 12:28:17 am
Candelario: 2-6, 2B, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_06_dchrok_dbrrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 07, 2011, 07:49:18 am
I had athletes with mono.  They ought to send Simpson home and let him try again next spring.  Seriously.  It's very debilitating and takes a lot of time to recover thoroughly.  By trying to work through it they are destroying what's left of his confidence.  JMO
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 07, 2011, 08:31:21 am
Cubs related questions from the Baseball America chat this morning.

    Norman (San Jose): at midseason, have any players moved up significantly in your top 100 prospects?

Jim Callis: I took a wait-and-see attitude on Cardinals righthander Carlos Martinez on my personal Top 100 coming into the season, but I'm not waiting any longer. He, Brad Peacock (Nationals) and Taijuan Walker (Mariners) are the pitchers who have jumped the most in my estimation. I also was trying to be conservative on Cubs outfielder Matt Szczur, and I've got him No. 44 on my personal Top 50 right now. Also buying into Padres third baseman Jedd Gyorko.


    Navin (Pasadena, CA): With Brett Jackson scuffling at AA, would you rate Szczur or Baez (when he signs) as the Cubs top prospect? Thank you!

Jim Callis: Jackson was off to a very good start before he got hurt. I'd still give him the nod over Szczur, but it's close. I'd go Jackson, Szczur, Baez for now.


    Nils (Stamford): Hi Jim, Austin Kirk's no hitter this week seemed to put his already good season on the radar. Is he this good or are we looking at more a case of smoke and mirrors?

Jim Callis: Nice accomplishment, but I still see him more as a reliever in the majors. He's 21, which isn't young for low A, he's not very projectable at 6-foot-1 and 200 pounds, and his stuff is fringy to average. He's lefthanded and throws strikes, which


    Tom (Chicago): The Cubs have yet to sign any of their top 15 draft picks. What are your thoughts? Are they signing them to overslot bonuses which is holding up the announcements?

Jim Callis: I don't think it means anything--they'll sign their share of their top picks. Rumors are that Zeke DeVoss (third round) is on the verge of signing. None of the early first-rounder has signed yet, so don't worry about Javier Baez, and second-rounder Dan Vogelbach was seeking $1.65 million. Fourth-rounder Tony Zych fell further than expected, so he'll probably be over-slot too.


I thought this was a relevant question with all the signing prospect early talk.

    raymond (New York): Hi Jim, thanks for the chat. why does MLB give teams hassles if they want to sign draftees above slot in June or July, but on 8/15 (Yanks, Red Sox,Pirates) it is okay to agree to absurd bonuses ? how does that keep bonuses down ? thanks for your reply


Jim Callis: You read my mind . . . just wrote a column on this. It's OK for the Rangers to drop $8.5 million on two Dominican outfielders (which I have no problem with), but teams have to wait two-plus months to pay their draftees. It's stupid and short-sighted. Delaying signings doesn't keep bonuses down, either, because everyone has a pretty good idea of what guys are going to sign for.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 07, 2011, 09:18:06 am
Jim Callis: . . . just wrote a column on this. It's OK for the Rangers to drop $8.5 million on two Dominican outfielders (which I have no problem with), but teams have to wait two-plus months to pay their draftees. It's stupid and short-sighted. Delaying signings doesn't keep bonuses down, either, because everyone has a pretty good idea of what guys are going to sign for.

If getting draftees signed and in the folder quickly instead of waiting "two-plus month to pay their draftees" makes no difference, I wonder why Callis would say it is "stupid and short-sighted."

Oh, that's right, it wasn't Callis who said the delay makes no difference.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 07, 2011, 09:21:35 am
Austin Kirk no-hitter highlights (preceded and followed by ads)  4:25

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?content_id=16655789&sid=t443 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?content_id=16655789&sid=t443)

The light conditions were terrible for the hitters.

He gets the obligatory shaving cream pie
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 07, 2011, 09:26:20 am
If getting draftees signed and in the folder quickly instead of waiting "two-plus month to pay their draftees" makes no difference, I wonder why Callis would say it is "stupid and short-sighted."

Oh, that's right, it wasn't Callis who said the delay makes no difference.

Are you talking bout me with that?  I've said I agree with you that the sooner the better as far as getting them in...i'm just not sure how you do it without paying them more money.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 07, 2011, 10:03:49 am
Are you talking bout me with that?

Not at all.

I agree with you that the sooner the better as far as getting them in...i'm just not sure how you do it without paying them more money.

To the extent that it takes more money, it takes more money.  More money, however, does not necessarily mean any significant amount more.

I have not suggested that the team take the offer it now initially makes and make that the offer from which it will not go up, but will only go down as the summer progresses.  I have suggested that the team make a "reasonable/generous" offer, pretty much the offer it believes the player is in fact worth, and for which he will sign, and which the team likely would expect to end up paying anyway if it engaged in the typical negotiation process.... with the difference being that the team would not be raising that offer, though it might negotiate around the edges (such as money for college or the like), and with the offer FALLING by previously announced amounts as the summer progresses.

Those concerned about this approach costing more and cause problems with the team possibly spending more than it had budgeted (Dave expressed the concern, though he did not respond to my request that he explain it) don't seem to remember that the team can at any point withdraw any and all offers, or unilaterally cut them.

If the team budgets $10M and makes offers which total $13M, as the picks accepting the offers start exhausting the available $10M, the remaining offers can be withdrawn or reduced.  This really is not a problem.  In fact it might even be an effective added incentive to get draftees to sign -- let them know what the total budget it, what the total offers are, and that when the budget is exhausted ALL remaining offers will be withdrawn, and that as the budget gets close to exhausted the remaining offers will be re-evaluated and reduced.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2011, 10:24:52 am
Quote
They ought to send Simpson home and let him try again next spring.

He's already had his career shortened a year by Jes' estimates. You send him home for the year, he might as well become a baker.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 07, 2011, 11:58:42 am
He brought up a point that I knew, but had forgotten about.  MLB has to approve signings of draft choices, and seldom approves substantial overslot signings until the last week or so.  With the Cubs drafting several that are definitely going to be overslot if they sign, like Vogelbach and several others, they may have little choice in the matter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 07, 2011, 01:09:09 pm
jes, I think that your concept of deciding what a player is worth, offering, and having it take-it-or-leave-it makes a lot of sense.  And the notion of reducing the offer if the guy dawdles, that would be an incentive to decide quickly and cut to the action.  For whatever reason, it's just so contrary to how teams, players, and agents operate that the novelty of the concept might lead to problems, such as Ray suggested, that you'd need to sacrifice a year or more of draft picks to teach players/advisors the lesson.  That cost might be too steep for me. 

I wonder how psychology works on these situations.  The day after they are drafted, it seems every kid is excited about it and is fired up to go pro if the money is right.  To some degree I'd think that if the Cubs called right away, and gave a good offer, and pushed for an early decision, perhaps they'd actually get a lot.  I could imagine that not calling for a week or two, and then letting things drag out for two months, might perhaps dampen a kid's enthusiasm to sign.  Or maybe the reverse is true.  A guy is kind of on track to go to U of X, and says he'd rather go to school than get the money.  But then there's a $150 or $350 or $850 offer waiting for two months, and maybe every day that passes tests the resolve to decline all those dollars.  So maybe that money eats at the kids and by July and August, they're ready to take what they wouldn't in June? 

Two other points:
1.  I don't think the extra month or two of play makes **that** much difference.  Sure I'd certainly prefer that guys get started right away, no question, and in the case of some players it can benefit them.  Sure it would be nice.  But if a guy has big-league ability, I don't think signing on June 28th versus August 10th really changes whether or not he'll end up being a productive Cub.  A number or players who are qualified jump right up.  Rhoderic signed at deadline, and he started right up at Daytona.  Raley signed late, but he went straight to Daytona also.  Rusin too, maybe?  Kirk's stuff wasn't that great and he wasn't really qualified for Peoria last spring.  Struck signed at deadline, but he started right out at Peoria the following spring, and 1.5 seasons later he's in AAA.  in the Kirk case, I don't think it was a question of when he signed, but how strong his arm was and how good/ready he was.  He struggled in XST last year, from Az Phil's reports, and simply wasn't ready for full-season early. 

2.  I do think Wilken likes to draft-and-follow with a fair number of selections.  Would like to see how a guy performs in summer league to help evaluate how much he's worth.  So I think often the decision about "what he's worth" is clearer later in the summer.  In the spring, they are tracking hundreds or even thousands of prospects, and thus have to divide their time.  In the summer they can really focus on the guys they've picked and watch them repeatedly.   

3.  I don't think it's a rush for guys to get up.  If they are so successful that the only thing that eventually stops their career is age, that means they'll be successful big-leaguers for many years and will end up rich and comfy.  If I need to sign fast because I worry that I'll start to age and slow down at 34 and I need to get in as much as I can before then, then I'm going to have a great career.  Whether I start at 23 or 24, I'll still have a long and productive big-league career. If their arrival gets delayed by a month or two, or even a full season, I don't think it impacts how good they'll be once they're up.  And since Hendry's arrival as the farm boss 15 years ago, which of the players his team has signed has remained desirable beyond the six club-controlled years?  zambrano, Wood, and now Marmol and Marshall.  That's it, in 15 years.  Getting old before they had a chance to get the most out of their talent has NOT been even remotely a limiting factor.  My lack of priority on rushing guys up is probably consistent with why it's not urgent or helpful to rush existing young prospects up.  Let them develop thoroughly and patiently, and bring them up when they're ready to actually play well.  If you can get six good club-controlled years before free agency hits, and you still want them then, count your blessings. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 07, 2011, 01:45:26 pm
LHP Chris Rusin promoted from Tennessee to Iowa

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=543734 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=543734)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 07, 2011, 02:37:22 pm
LHP Chris Rusin promoted from Tennessee to Iowa

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=543734 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=543734)
Great.  Now they're playing Rusin roulette.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 07, 2011, 02:48:49 pm
Great.  Now they're playing Rusin roulette.

Booooooo!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 07, 2011, 03:09:12 pm
How about:  fools Rusin?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 07, 2011, 03:20:00 pm
Craig - another point to consider is that most good draftees have agents, and no matter how excited the kid is, he is almost always going to follow the recommendations of his agent.  Otherwise, why have an agent.

A few years ago one of the kids signed early, even though his agent had a reputation for delaying signing until the last minute.  I don't remember the kids name.  But when the agent was asked why he signed so early, he replied that the prospect told him that he wanted to sign immediately and get his career started.  The agent carried out his wishes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 07, 2011, 03:27:07 pm
jes, I think that your concept of deciding what a player is worth, offering, and having it take-it-or-leave-it makes a lot of sense.  And the notion of reducing the offer if the guy dawdles, that would be an incentive to decide quickly and cut to the action.  For whatever reason, it's just so contrary to how teams, players, and agents operate that the novelty of the concept might lead to problems, such as Ray suggested, that you'd need to sacrifice a year or more of draft picks to teach players/advisors the lesson.  That cost might be too steep for me. 

If the first year you use this approach you drafted largely college players from the 4th round on, and after the 3rd round you only drafted HS players who you believed would not pose signing problems, and you made it a point to draft HS players only in the first three rounds, any of those first three picks you lost you would get comp picks for the next year, and any who signed, most likely after seeing the offer fall, would likely enough be willing to share their experience sufficiently that you would not even come close to needing to ever sacrifice a year of draft picks.


I don't think the extra month or two of play makes **that** much difference.  Sure I'd certainly prefer that guys get started right away, no question, and in the case of some players it can benefit them.  Sure it would be nice.  But if a guy has big-league ability, I don't think signing on June 28th versus August 10th really changes whether or not he'll end up being a productive Cub.  A number or players who are qualified jump right up.  Rhoderic signed at deadline, and he started right up at Daytona.  Raley signed late, but he went straight to Daytona also.  Rusin too, maybe?  Kirk's stuff wasn't that great and he wasn't really qualified for Peoria last spring.  Struck signed at deadline, but he started right out at Peoria the following spring, and 1.5 seasons later he's in AAA.  in the Kirk case, I don't think it was a question of when he signed, but how strong his arm was and how good/ready he was.  He struggled in XST last year, from Az Phil's reports, and simply wasn't ready for full-season early.


How much is "**that**" much?  It will in the case of several players delay their meaningful entry into the system and their evaluation by one summer, which in many cases will cut a year off the front end of their career.  Will it do that for everyone?  No.  And in the case of some they would still be at Boise the summer after the draft even if they signed on day one.  But if they sign on the last day, it delays the time when their evaluation as a pro can begin.

I do think Wilken likes to draft-and-follow with a fair number of selections.

Players who are true draft and follows would be exceptions.


I don't think it's a rush for guys to get up.  If they are so successful that the only thing that eventually stops their career is age, that means they'll be successful big-leaguers for many years and will end up rich and comfy.  If I need to sign fast because I worry that I'll start to age and slow down at 34 and I need to get in as much as I can before then, then I'm going to have a great career.  Whether I start at 23 or 24, I'll still have a long and productive big-league career. If their arrival gets delayed by a month or two, or even a full season, I don't think it impacts how good they'll be once they're up.  And since Hendry's arrival as the farm boss 15 years ago, which of the players his team has signed has remained desirable beyond the six club-controlled years?  zambrano, Wood, and now Marmol and Marshall.  That's it, in 15 years.  Getting old before they had a chance to get the most out of their talent has NOT been even remotely a limiting factor.  My lack of priority on rushing guys up is probably consistent with why it's not urgent or helpful to rush existing young prospects up.  Let them develop thoroughly and patiently, and bring them up when they're ready to actually play well.  If you can get six good club-controlled years before free agency hits, and you still want them then, count your blessings. 

Not a rush for whom?

Certainly the players want to get up as quickly as possible, not just because that is their goal, but because they then start earning big league money and have fewer bus trips.

It would also seem important for a team to have prospects reach the majors quickly.  Suggesting otherwise just strains credulity.  But I have not suggested "rushing" prospects.  That is your word choice.  Not mine.  I have said that giving up a year of development and evaluation, and delaying the most important part of development and evaluation (live competition against players at the same level), is a mistake.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 07, 2011, 03:29:03 pm
Does anyone know if the Latin American signings can play this year either in the DR or in Mesa, or do they have to wait until the fall or next year?

I know that 16 year olds can not play, but what about those older?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 07, 2011, 03:58:54 pm
jes, I think that your concept of deciding what a player is worth, offering, and having it take-it-or-leave-it makes a lot of sense.  And the notion of reducing the offer if the guy dawdles, that would be an incentive to decide quickly and cut to the action.  For whatever reason, it's just so contrary to how teams, players, and agents operate that the novelty of the concept might lead to problems

The problem is that a fixed take it or leave it approach is not a negotiation.   Given that even draftees are not potted plants and engage agents to represent them, it is reasonable to expect that there will be some kind of good faith negotiation.  Also, in other contexts, there's nothing novel about that approach.  In the labor context, it goes back many decades. In endeavors that require bargaining to be in good faith, that approach will get you a court order to bargain.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 07, 2011, 04:00:07 pm
Reb nails it...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 07, 2011, 04:03:49 pm
Reb, I don't believe that the draftees are members of the MLBPA or that the labor law rules you allude to apply.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 07, 2011, 04:14:44 pm
I think I said "in other contexts."   But, even in this context--in which draftees are not in the bargaining group--a non-negotiation is not an acceptable practice in the business.  On the other hand, it's always possible that you we could see a fixed slotting bonus system for the draft that is the product of bargaining between the players union and MLB.  The draft is not totally unrelated to the interests of the players union.  That's why they negotiate draft choice compensation for free agents and the like.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: sam hannam on July 07, 2011, 04:22:04 pm
Zambrano to rehab in Peoria tomorrow night.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/news ... p&sid=t443
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 07, 2011, 04:23:47 pm
Oh, JBN will be in heaven.

Hey, Carlos, that guy behind the dugout yelling at you?  We know him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2011, 04:25:31 pm
They have a lot in common actually. They both think Marmol sucks, for instance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 07, 2011, 04:44:24 pm
They have a lot in common actually. They both think Marmol sucks, for instance.

But I doubt JBN has gone through anger management counseling.  Might be a good idea though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 07, 2011, 04:54:17 pm
reb, I'm not in law or negotiation business.  Are you saying that if you make a good-faith offer that is at or above the slot, and in almost all of the Cub selections this year would be a good-faith overslot or superslot offer, that this could get you a court complaint that you aren't "bargaining"? 

So if I judge that the guy is worth up to $350K, and I draft him in the 6th round where his "slot" value is $175, if I offer him $175K in June and then "bargain" my way up to $350K in August, it's legal "bargaining"?  But if I just offered the same $350K superslot in June that was going to be my max offer in August anyway, that would be bad-faith and could get a court order to bargain? 

Very interesting.  I'm not sure I understand the logic there.  (But there are many laws whose logic I don't understand...) 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 07, 2011, 05:02:02 pm
It's not collective bargaining.  So, there are no real legal restraints over any negotiating tactic--in the draft context.

In collective bargaining, it's very likely going to be deemed illegal if one side comes in with one offer and refuses to negotiate anything else thereafter beyond the original offer.  Take it or leave it. Generally speaking, it's supposed to be a give and take of sorts--in the labor context.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: BearHit on July 07, 2011, 05:04:33 pm
Yeah - like Adam Sandler in the movie Anger Management
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 07, 2011, 05:34:44 pm
Craig, while labor law was not the focus of my practice, and while I no longer HAVE a practice, I am pretty sure Reb is mistaken.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 07, 2011, 05:39:38 pm
RHP Enyelberth Pena, of the Cubs Dominican summer league team, tested positive for nandrolone, an anabolic steroid, and has been given a 50-game suspension
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 07, 2011, 05:45:45 pm
I don't think refusing to bargain could get you into court.  As Jes said, Labor laws do not apply here.  Although the draft is a result of labor negotiations with the player's unions, the negotiation with any draft choice is no more controlled by labor law than bargaining with an individual player.  If we offer Pujols 15 million per year and refuse to raise our offer, he can hardly sue us.  If, as happened years ago, all teams get together and agree to offer Pujols no more than 15 million, THEN he would have a case.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2011, 08:46:06 pm
Jeffrey Baez & Xavier Bautista moved up to the DSL 2 team.

Baez: 1-2, 2B, 2 BB, 2 SB

Bautista: 1-3, HR, 3 RBI, BB, 2 K

Candelario: 3-4, HR, 3 RBI, BB, K, E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_07_dyarok_dchrok_1



Sanchez: 1-4, HR, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_07_dcurok_dparok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 07, 2011, 08:52:51 pm
Is it possible to promote someone from the DR league to Mesa in the middle of the season, ie Candelaria) or are there some visa restrictions that prevent it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 07, 2011, 08:55:57 pm
Is it possible to promote someone from the DR league to Mesa in the middle of the season, ie Candelaria) or are there some visa restrictions that prevent it.

I was curious about the visa subject myself the 2nd or 3rd and posed a similar question above them but no one answered.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 07, 2011, 08:58:43 pm
I missed the promotion, but Del Valle is pitching for Peoria tonight.  so far, 3 innings with 4 runs, 2 of them earned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2011, 09:01:07 pm
Candelario's only 17. I doubt the Cubs would send him to Mesa this year even if it were possible, no matter how well he does.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 07, 2011, 09:04:50 pm
Richard Jones was one of the first great power-little contact players in recent drafts.  He has shown decent improvement each year, and just hit his 15th home run in Peoria.  He is slugging over 300 and has a batting average over 290.  Still striking out at about 25% rate, but has bumped up his walks a little bit.

From what I have heard, he is at first base because he is less bad there than in the outfield or as a catcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2011, 09:43:01 pm
Jackson: 3-4, K, PO

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_07_tenaax_monaax_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2011, 10:39:50 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_07_iowaaa_nozaaa_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_07_belafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2011, 11:25:10 pm
Golden: 1-2, 2 BB, SB

Hoilman: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, BB, K

Wells: 5-1-1-1-2-3,  9-2 GO/FO


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_07_giarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2011, 12:09:27 am
Hernandez: 2-4, K, 2 E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_07_giarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brs2 on July 08, 2011, 07:25:40 am
DaveP, it's not my area of the law, and usually refusing to bargain would not get you into court. But I suspect a team which holds exclusive rights to negotiate with a player (for instance, as a result of the mlb draft) would be vulnerable to a claim based e.g. on whether it negotiates in "good faith".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2011, 10:14:21 am
BA out with a  mid-season top 50 prospect list.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/midseason-top-50-prospects-list/

Somehow, Szczur made it at 48.

Jackson is listed at 32.

Hak-Ju Lee is 22nd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 08, 2011, 10:37:31 am
BA out with a  mid-season top 50 prospect list.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/midseason-top-50-prospects-list/

Somehow, Szczur made it at 48.

Jackson is listed at 32.

Hak-Ju Lee is 22nd.

Callis had him even higher than that at 44 on his personal list and said he was trying to be conservative.   I can't help but wonder where he would place him if he wasn't trying to be conservative because that is higher than i figured he would have come in on their list.  Posted the following yesterday from baseball america chat. 

Cubs related questions from the Baseball America chat this morning.

    Norman (San Jose): at midseason, have any players moved up significantly in your top 100 prospects?

Jim Callis: I took a wait-and-see attitude on Cardinals righthander Carlos Martinez on my personal Top 100 coming into the season, but I'm not waiting any longer. He, Brad Pea**** (Nationals) and Taijuan Walker (Mariners) are the pitchers who have jumped the most in my estimation. I also was trying to be conservative on Cubs outfielder Matt Szczur, and I've got him No. 44 on my personal Top 50 right now. Also buying into Padres third baseman Jedd Gyorko.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2011, 10:44:56 am
Quote
Callis had him even higher than that at 44 on his personal list and said he was trying to be conservative.

Oh I figured it was Callis' doing that had him that high. He tends to be on the optimistic side when it comes to the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 08, 2011, 11:22:35 am
Oh I figured it was Callis' doing that had him that high. He tends to be on the optimistic side when it comes to the Cubs.

One thing i like about Szczur is he definitely strikes me as the leader type the cubs have been missing once/if he gets to the big's, lives up to the hype and matures.  Perhaps Flaherty is that type too?  You know he has to be intelligent coming from Vandy.

The problem is I'm not sure how many others strike me as that type.  Not really sure Colvin does.  Vitters definitely doesn't.  Jackson is another laid back Californian, so not sure he is that type either, but from what i've seen he is much more so than Vitters and maybe has potential in that area.  He definitely plays hard.  Maybe an Edmonds type?  Don't see Baez as that type.  Vogelbach maybe has potential?  I like him.  Lemahieu was more of a quiet leader on lsu's squad, but not sure he is talented enough for it to matter.

Haven't read/heard enough of McNutt to really say.  I could see Simpson being a leader if/when he gets over the after effects of the mono and remembers how to throw a 95 mph fastball.

Leadership was one reason i had hoped the Cubs would take Mikie Mahtook in the draft.  That guy oozes leadership to go along with being uber talented.  Still can't believe he fell that far, but the Rays lucked up getting him at 31.

I hope Castro grows into it, but not sure he has the personality type.  Of course, he is still very young.  The future leadership of the Cubs concerns me.  Are there any guys in the minors i'm missing that possess a strong leadership quality and enough talent where people will listen?  Or, am i passing judgement on all these guys while they're still really young and you really don't know how it will bloom in them until they are veterans?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 08, 2011, 11:48:09 am
Leadership is something that can be brought into a team from the outside.  It would be nice to have players like Szcuzr provide from the farm, and I hope that he does, but older vets on the decline, who no longer perform at levels that demand high salaries, but have been around long enough to feel comfortable in asserting themselves in the clubhouse and who are respected by teammates are usually available.

Decades ago players like that were often named player-managers.  While I doubt that any team is likely to do that in the near future, I wonder why teams do not use player-COACHES.  Designate one area of the game, whether baserunning or infield play or outfield play or even hitting, and have one of the players also serve as the team coach in that area.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 12:03:32 pm
If your very good players are also very good leaders, you really have something.

If your very bad players are very good leaders, you have nothing.

Let's start with talent and ability, and hope for the rest.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 12:07:53 pm
bs2 - I can understand that if you gave a lowball offer and stuck with it, but we were talking about overslot offers.  How can anyone say that you are not bargaining in good faith if you gave an initial offer that was over the going rate.

I admit that I am probably prejudiced in the matter, since I do not understand the concept of bargaining in "good faith" in the first place.  If I give a union, for instance, my best offer up front and refuse to increase it, how can I not be bargaining in good faith.  Forcing someone to inch higher or lower on their offer merely causes them to lower their first offer in the first place.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 08, 2011, 12:41:28 pm
If your very good players are also very good leaders, you really have something.

If your very bad players are very good leaders, you have nothing.

Let's start with talent and ability, and hope for the rest.

Yeah, that's why i hope Szczur becomes an all star out of the Cubs system if anyone does. I could be wrong, but out of all the prospects, I see him as having the best traits of leadership. 

Leadership is something that can be brought into a team from the outside.  It would be nice to have players like Szcuzr provide from the farm, and I hope that he does, but older vets on the decline, who no longer perform at levels that demand high salaries, but have been around long enough to feel comfortable in asserting themselves in the clubhouse and who are respected by teammates are usually available.

I agree with that for the most part, but usually the guys declining aren't going to be around for a long time; and, the best leaders are going to have been with the team for a few years.  Or at least i would think so, as I've never played baseball at the major league level.  I guess there are exceptions, such as if you are a really huge star like pujols(who i would be scared to sign btw so don't think i'm advocating him).  Even then, it would take some adjustment time.

Of course, that could be where a guy like Garza comes in if he remains with the team long term, a young established veteran to begin building around. In a year or 2, he may be, along with castro, just about the longest tenured non bull-pen cubs on the team.  And Soriano, unfortunately, but no chance he turns into a leader.  You'd think Soto would still be around but the Cubs don't seem thrilled with him because he lacks any sort of leadership qualities and you really need that in a catcher.   I think the amount of turnover the Cubs are about to experience over the next two years is going to be astounding.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 08, 2011, 12:47:28 pm
1.  Agree with Dave, if an initial offer is slot, overslot, or superslot, I don't understand how "bad faith" can be claimed.  If you do as jes has suggested and make a serious good-faith best offer right out of the chute, that seems like much better faith than starting with an unworthy offer just so that you can later move up to the good offer. 

2.  Hard to guess "leadership".  Brains has something to do with it, but simply being intelligent hardly equals leading.  I think Aram is a rather intelligent individual, but that doesn't give him a leaders personality. 

Quote
Jackson is another laid back Californian......


Not sure about that.  My sense is that he's a pretty fiery player, or at least at times.  He's gotten thrown out several times for arguing calls, so I'm not sure "laid back" applies.  Of course, Bradley got thrown out too at times, while sleepwalking many others.  But I think Jackson might have the intensity.  he's certainly intelligent enough and articulate enough where he could perhaps be a good leader.   


Quote
Lemahieu was more of a quiet leader...



From hearing him at the convention, he's got no chance.  He really had a hard time speaking, and what he said was slow, mumbly, repetitive, and boring.  I'm very optimistic about him as a player, and I have no reason to question whether his work habits, game effort, or game alertness are problematic.  But I just don't think he talks well enough to be much of a leader.   (Chris Carpenter was excellent, and Barney was terrific.) 


I don't think brining in leaders from outside is ideal. Sure, if it's DLee who's going to be around for 7 years.  But I think it's best to have guys who have been around for a while and will be around for a while.  Such that the other players have seen that they walk the talk, and such that they build up trust and an understanding of the player personalities that takes time. 


Some guys are leaders by power of personality.  But I'm not sure that Milton Bradley or Soriano or Aram are necessarily going to be "led" that much by Koyie Hill, who they probably don't respect as a player.  As Byrd noted, when you come in from outside, you don't want to look pushy, and you don't know guys respond to things, so it takes some time.  And if you're bringing fringe guys like Koyie and Reed Johnson to be leaders, but everybody understands they are on year-to-year status, that doesn't really establish a culture. 


Aaron Rodgers is smart, articulate, has been with the Green Bay Packers for many (5 or 6?) years, he knows the players, he wants to be a leader, he's respected as a smart player, and he's respected as a really disciplined player and a really hard worker.  Donald Driver is smart, a good talker, a good player, and a hard worker.  Those kinds of guys make excellent leaders and role models.  A young receiver will listen if Driver has something to say, any player on the Packers will listen if Rodgers has something to say or suggest or to tell him that he needs to change.  I'm not sure it works quite the same if you bring in Koyie or Doug Davis or a veteran bench player and expect them to become good leaders. 



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2011, 01:10:28 pm
Brett Jackson #3 on BA's newest Hot Sheet.

Austin Kirk gets a mention and Hayden Simpson as well though you might just want to skip that.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2011/2612048.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 08, 2011, 01:28:01 pm
BA forgot to make the obligatory reference to Simpson's mono.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 08, 2011, 01:28:19 pm

Not sure about that.  My sense is that he's a pretty fiery player, or at least at times.  He's gotten thrown out several times for arguing calls, so I'm not sure "laid back" applies.  Of course, Bradley got thrown out too at times, while sleepwalking many others.  But I think Jackson might have the intensity.  he's certainly intelligent enough and articulate enough where he could perhaps be a good leader.   


Yeah, and i knew he played all out, and why i sorta compared him to edmonds(shudders), though i'm not sure if that's a proper comparison or if there isn't a better one.  I do hope his personality is similar to his playing style, and is not the typical laid back laissez-faire California personality.  If it is similar, and he and Szczur both became at least slightly above average starting players which i think is entirely possible if not probable, i'd feel a lot better about the Cubs future leadership.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 08, 2011, 02:34:25 pm
Peoria vs Cedar Rapids tonight.  Big Z doesn't get to hit.


8    Szczur
9    Silva 
5    Rohan
3    Jones
2    Gibbs
6    Soto,
DH May
7    Giansanti
4    Alcantara

1    Zambrano
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 02:39:48 pm
I think it was Zambrano who was an extremely popular figure with his team mates on his last rehab assignment.  I took the whole team out to dinner in him, every day he was there.

Having known many minor leaguers personally, I can vouch for how popular this would make him.  A big break from the McDonalds and Burger Kings that make up their normal cuisine.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 02:42:58 pm
As far as leaders are concerned, the two that get the highest marks from me among those that came through the system are Soto and Barney.

It is much harder to tell leadership in pitchers, but I suspect that if he is able to perform adequately on the field, Samardzija will also qualify.  It is hard to be looked at as a leader if you do poorly on the field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 08, 2011, 02:43:35 pm
Brett Jackson #3 on BA's newest Hot Sheet.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2011/2612048.html (http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2011/2612048.html)

I know Jackson had a rough stretch before and especially after his injury, but he sure seems back on track this week:  .440/.548/.840 (11-for-25), 4 R, 1 2B, 3 HR, 5 RBIs, 6 BB, 8 SO, 1-for-1 SB.

And in spite of cooling off for a while, he's still having a very good season.  His BA isn't great (.273), and he does strike out a lot, but everything else looks good to me.  In 227 AB, 10 HR, 32 RBI, .388 OBP, .476 SLG, .864 OPS, with 42 BB to go with his 70 Ks.  Although he has 13 SB, he has been thrown out 6 times, which is not so good.

If he can continue to hit well, I hope there'll be a trade that opens a spot for him in Chicago very soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 08, 2011, 02:54:40 pm
If he can continue to hit well, I hope there'll be a trade that opens a spot for him in Chicago very soon.

More likely, he'll take the field in another uniform, as Hendry trades him for next year's Matt Garza.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2011, 03:02:25 pm
Doesn't every major leaguer who rehabs in the minors buy dinner for the team? Wood and Prior have done it on their umpteen rehab assignments.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 03:05:37 pm
I'm sure that Zambrano was not the only one.  But he was the only one that I remember hearing about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 08, 2011, 03:07:16 pm
bs2 - I can understand that if you gave a lowball offer and stuck with it, but we were talking about overslot offers.  How can anyone say that you are not bargaining in good faith if you gave an initial offer that was over the going rate.

I admit that I am probably prejudiced in the matter, since I do not understand the concept of bargaining in "good faith" in the first place.  If I give a union, for instance, my best offer up front and refuse to increase it, how can I not be bargaining in good faith.  Forcing someone to inch higher or lower on their offer merely causes them to lower their first offer in the first place.

As I said before, as to drafted players in the draft context, that's not collective-bargaining and there are no legal constraints against whatever tactic a club wants to take.   Still, as to high draft choices, I don't think a take it or leave it approach is acceptable as a practical matter.  You have agents lurking, the players union interested in collateral draft related matters (compensation, etc) and the like.  As to low draft choices, it probably happens all the time.  You're worth $75,000, take it or leave it, and we don't care that much if you don't sign.

To those who are interested, in the labor relations context, it's different.  The take it or leave it approach was a big deal decades ago as a bargaining tactic by General Electric--the tactic was known as "Boulwarism."  That tactic was found to be an unfair labor practice and illegal by the 2nd Circuit court of appeals, who noted that "the Company, having created a view of the bargaining process that admitted of no compromise, was trapped by its own creation. It could no longer seek peace without total victory, for it had by its own words and actions branded any compromise a defeat."  Thereafter, the tactic died as a form of bad faith bargaining.  Again, that's in the collective bargaining context.

A drafted player negotiating with a team is not collective bargaining so, in concept, a club can take that kind of approach if it wants to.  But, if you want to get your key draft choices signed, it's totally impractical.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 08, 2011, 03:14:56 pm
Doesn't every major leaguer who rehabs in the minors buy dinner for the team? Wood and Prior have done it on their umpteen rehab assignments.
Yes, it is part of that unwritten rule book that Bob Brenly often talks about but I don't think it applies to "minimum salary" type players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 08, 2011, 03:19:05 pm
Fernando Perez has been released.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 08, 2011, 03:19:46 pm
Fernando Perez has been released.
The Cubs got him in the Garza deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 08, 2011, 03:26:24 pm
As far as leaders are concerned, the two that get the highest marks from me among those that came through the system are Soto and Barney.

It is much harder to tell leadership in pitchers, but I suspect that if he is able to perform adequately on the field, Samardzija will also qualify.  It is hard to be looked at as a leader if you do poorly on the field.


You think Soto is a good leader?  I had listed him as not exactly a leader when i was rambling above so I'm wondering if i pegged him wrong.  Between work, and wgn curtailing games over the years, i don't get to watch near the games i used to, so can't base my opinion on seeing him play day in and day out.  But, after the marijuana incident, and his constant weight battles, i would not have figured he had the mental fortitude to be a leader.  Just asking to clarify, and to make sure i understand you correctly, because it would be great if you told me i was wrong.  That would make me more likely to want to keep him since it would be one less hole to fill and we already have enough of them.  Not that my opinion matters in what the Cubs do, but you know what I mean.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 08, 2011, 03:27:33 pm
Fernando Perez was on the 40-man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 08, 2011, 03:35:02 pm
If you're looking for a team leader---another argument for going after Pujols this off-season.   

For a few weeks, I think I actually leaned toward Fielder over Pujols (as a free agent) but now I thinki that is just flat wrong.   Don't expect it to happen, but it's Pujols for me, if he actually goes on the market and Ricketts is willing to get in the game.

Regarding 1B, Jayson Stark said in his ESPN chat today that Carlos Pena might be one of the main attractive trade deadline targets, with several teams interested in him---and virtually no chance that Aramis will be traded. 

Trade Pena for good prospects.  Sign Pujols.   I'm with the program.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 08, 2011, 03:40:43 pm
If Pujols and Fielder get close to what they're asking for, the correct answer for the Cubs is "neither".  Fielder at 7-8 years is at least 2-3 years too long.  And Pujols is presumably still looking for a record-setting contract, which is always a bad idea for a guy on the wrong side of 30.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 08, 2011, 03:44:55 pm
Iowa is down to four outfielders:  Tyler Colvin, Lou Montanez, Brad Snyder, and Ty Wright so there just about has to be some sort of deal or promotion in the works.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 08, 2011, 03:51:53 pm
I think it is a mistake to apply some kind of general rule to Pujols.  This guy is a pantheon future HOFer and is a different animal than other outstanding players.  I think he is more like T. Williams, Bonds, Aaron and a rare few more here and there who will be great for a long time and very, very good even at or near 40.  I don't mean a 10-year contract or something silly like that, but we're not talking Alfonso Soriano here.

In Pujols case, it's more about money and whether he really would consider leaving St. Louis than it is about performance, as far as I'm concerned.  Nobody is totally risk free, but this is a good way to spend your money.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 08, 2011, 03:56:44 pm
Everything points to Pujols looking to get an ARod-like contract, though...so it may fall into that silly 10 year category.  That's too much for anyone.  I mean, ARod's contract already looks awful 3 years later, and he signed it about the same age Pujols will be this offseason.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 08, 2011, 04:00:44 pm
Iowa is down to four outfielders:  Tyler Colvin, Lou Montanez, Brad Snyder, and Ty Wright so there just about has to be some sort of deal or promotion in the works.

No it doesn't.  Triple-A rosters usually only carry three backup position players.  Not surprising at all that Iowa is only carrying 4 outfielders.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 08, 2011, 04:08:34 pm
I read somewhere earlier that TB may be interested in bringing Pena back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 08, 2011, 04:18:31 pm
I think it is a mistake to apply some kind of general rule to Pujols.  This guy is a pantheon future HOFer and is a different animal than other outstanding players.  I think he is more like T. Williams, Bonds, Aaron and a rare few more here and there who will be great for a long time and very, very good even at or near 40.  I don't mean a 10-year contract or something silly like that, but we're not talking Alfonso Soriano here.

In Pujols case, it's more about money and whether he really would consider leaving St. Louis than it is about performance, as far as I'm concerned.  Nobody is totally risk free, but this is a good way to spend your money.

He really is the ultimate risk-reward.  If he plays like he is capable of playing for the duration of the contract, then he is worth it to a big market team(as long as it isn't too record-setting) like the Cubs that has the budget to surround him with talent.  A plus, plus, plus guy in the line up like that just makes everyone else so much better and i would love to see a prime pujols in the line up.  I think for a certain kind of player, he might be more likely to sign here too than he would otherwise if he was hitting beside pujols so there or other advantages than the obvious.

I understand even great players have down years, but i can't get past worrying that this year is the beginning of some sort of descent, and if the Cubs signed him, they'd be screwed for the next 8 years.  Sometimes the best deals are the ones not made, but successful people/teams/whatever are successful a lot of times because they took that risk that everyone else was either too wary or not in a position to take and relied on a little luck to compliment the diligent work that led them to reach that decision. 

If their study of him leads them to believe his bat hasn't slowed down and he will be able maintain it into the foreseeable future, that his body will hold up(boy were off there on Soriano), and that this year was an abnormality and not the start of a descent, then i don't mind them going for it.  However, it will not bother me in the least if they decide not to pursue him either. 

I think one benefit he would give some other teams, but might not give the cubs as much is apparel sales.  They already sale so much, would he really make that much of a difference in the over all numbers?  I know a winning team would, but i mean him alone, if he had no influence on the win-loss record.  That could affect some teams offers to him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 08, 2011, 04:24:28 pm
I wonder how much Pujols or Fielder want to go the 29th place team and with limited prospect for major improvement.  I suppose if you're a great player, you figure that you alone will transform a 29th place team to 15th at least, so maybe it would make sense to them.  But with a currently woeful farm situation, a bad rotation, and no young pitching in sight, I struggle to think that Pujols in his 30's should want to be part of a rebuilding program. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 08, 2011, 04:29:05 pm
I agree with that for the most part, but usually the guys declining aren't going to be around for a long time;

Good point, and one of the reasons I would like to see a return to player-coaches, which would have them remain around longer.  One reason I believe that doesn't happen to the degree that it once did is that many of the players you might want to do it with, and who once would have been eager to do so, now have playing careers paying them so much money that they are not very interested in working for what will for them be the relatively low pay of a coach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 04:33:47 pm
Reb - would you be willing to give Pujols a 10 year contract at 30 million per year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 08, 2011, 04:52:48 pm
The Cubs got him in the Garza deal.

Great.  Now we have absolutely nothing to show for that deal!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 08, 2011, 04:55:58 pm
I would give Pujols 10/300.  It would kill any chance of the Cubs going to the World Series, but with these owners and management, ain't going to happen anyhow.  So I would do because it would absolutely kill Cardinal fans.  They would commit suicide and go into mourning on a scale that would dwarf our feelings re: Brock.  It would f'ing kill them.  And if we can't win a WS, at least those of us who live in Cardinal territory could laugh our a$$3$ off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 04:57:44 pm
But Rubberfin would be mad at you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 08, 2011, 05:08:00 pm
Reb - would you be willing to give Pujols a 10 year contract at 30 million per year?

Dave- If you rread my post, you'll see that I answered that question.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 08, 2011, 05:27:22 pm
Yeah, Dave, rread his post, ddumba$$.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 05:32:31 pm
Dave- If you rread my post, you'll see that I answered that question.

Not exactly.  You said that you didn't think he would get a 10 year contract.  My question was, if, in spite of your belief, he held out for 10 years at 30 million, would you sign him or let him pass?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 08, 2011, 05:44:09 pm
I woudn't even discuss a 10-year contract with Castro, so it should be obvious that I'd have no interest in one for Pujols or Fielder. Although ten years at $5 million a year for any of those players would work for me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 08, 2011, 06:33:27 pm
Found this in a BA chat from today.  Questions concerning cubs prospects and a couple in the Garza trade.

    Jose (New York): Hey, which top Cubs OF do you like more: Szczur or Jackson


J.J. Cooper: I'll say Jackson for now. But Szczur has more upside. Jackson's just much more of a safer bet, and in this case the difference is enough that I'll take the safer bet.

I'm not sure i agree that Jackson is the safer bet because of the strikeouts.  I realize Szczur is at a lower level and Jackson has shown more power so far, but his career strikeout percentage is less than half that of Jackson if my math skills haven't failed me, and that's after splitting time between baseball and football in college. Szczur has hit for a lil more power as the year went on after starting the year out as basically a zero in that department.  Jackson's slugging percentage is .476(ops 864)(slugging by month April(537) May(378) June(349) July(840) for the year and Szczur's is .431(ops .796)(slugging by month-april(394) may(487) june(456) July(250(ouch)).  Didn't they tinker with Szczur's swing?  Adjusting to that could be the reason he started out so bad in the power department and gotten better as year when on, although his doubles have remained consistent from month to month.  Unfortunately, his July has been atrocious.

Not sure why i made an impossible to read paragraph when all i am trying to ask is who is the safer prospect?  Know people debate who is a better prospect or who has a higher ceiling out of so and so and yada yada quite a bit, but people debate the safer prospect quite a bit less.  So, which of the 2 is more likely to be a 5 year solid starter in the big's, irregardless of ceiling?  I personally think it's Szczur but not by a wide margin and could be persuaded to the Jackson camp.  Curious what the split would be, and believe i'm i the minority.

yet another Szczur question

    Matt Szczur (Low A ????): Why am I here? I'm 22

J.J. Cooper: Context is everything. Scouts love Szczur's tools and his approach. He missed a lot of time in college because of football, so he's understandably behind the average 22-year-old. But whenever you ask a scout who's a player on the rise, Szczur's name is one of the first to come up.


And a question on Simpson...with the answer giving reason for consideration that it could make Simpson a better pitcher in the long run.  Of course, while i give his answer credence, Simpson would have to actually succeed with pitching with that mid 80's fastball at some level before i think it could apply to Simpson.

    Joe R. (Newport News, VA): Just thinking about Hayden Simpson makes me, a Cub fan, irate. Shouldn't the Cubs just admit they blundered and release him now, just to get him out of their (and my) system?

J.J. Cooper: Why release him? The money is invested now, give him time to prove that the stuff is still in his arm. He had a bad case of mono last year, so there's plenty of reasons to be patient and see if he can get back to full strength. A veteran pitching coach told me he'd love to wave a wand and make all of his pitchers spend a season trying to pitch with a mid 80s fastball so they'd learn how to pitch, then wave the wand to give them their fastball back. They'd be polished pitchers then with a plus fastball. There's always a chance that Simpson is one of the few pitchers that will get that chance.

and a couple of questions on guys lost in the Garza trade...first Archer

    Dr. John (New Orleans): Is Chris Archer even a Top 100 prospect anymore after plummeting out of the Top 50?

J.J. Cooper: Yes. It's a step back, but he hasn't fallen off a cliff.

And now Hak-Ju Lee, with a guy wondering if he is living off his hot start with his ranking.

    Tony (Frederick, MD): After a hot start, Hak-ju Lee's bat has cooled down. Now, the offensive performance fits what was expected (average/OBP guy with minimal power), but considering the poor SB rate and the fact that his defense still needs clean up work, his ranking seemed awfully high, and in all honesty, seems somewhat based upon his hot start. Is a speedy, minimal power guy who needs clean up work defensively really deserving of a position that high?

J.J. Cooper: The defense is cleaning up. Still some more work to go, but scouts project him to be a plus defender. And it's really hard to find big league shortstops. If you're a catcher, shortstop or third baseman, you're in high demand and the list somewhat reflects that.

Way long post, so sorry if misquoted or mistyped anything.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 08, 2011, 07:08:53 pm
From hearing him at the convention, he's got no chance.  He really had a hard time speaking, and what he said was slow, mumbly, repetitive, and boring.  I'm very optimistic about him as a player, and I have no reason to question whether his work habits, game effort, or game alertness are problematic.  But I just don't think he talks well enough to be much of a leader.   (Chris Carpenter was excellent, and Barney was terrific.) 

Public speaking to a large group of strangers is not a skill everyone has, and while it may be an important skill for political leadership, it is not important for having a leadership role on a team, where the entire audience would be team-mates, and generally the speaking would be to just one or two players at a time, and where the leadership which is often most important is by example.

I don't think brining in leaders from outside is ideal.

Lots of things are not "ideal," but it still often works well.


As Byrd noted, when you come in from outside, you don't want to look pushy, and you don't know guys respond to things, so it takes some time.

When Frank Robinson arrived in Baltimore in 1966, I think it took him about 15 minutes to establish himself as THE leader on a team which still had Brooks Robinson on it.  It didn't take Reggie Jackson long in NY either.


And if you're bringing fringe guys like Koyie and Reed Johnson to be leaders, but everybody understands they are on year-to-year status, that doesn't really establish a culture. 

Actually, it would if the vets were guys like them and the rest of the team were still figuring out their way.  It will not if you have much of the rest of the team high-salaried vets who are either under-performing (Soriano) or who do not seem to put out maximum effort (ARam).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 08, 2011, 07:19:07 pm

You think Soto is a good leader?  I had listed him as not exactly a leader when i was rambling above so I'm wondering if i pegged him wrong.  Between work, and wgn curtailing games over the years, i don't get to watch near the games i used to, so can't base my opinion on seeing him play day in and day out.  But, after the **** incident, and his constant weight battles, i would not have figured he had the mental fortitude to be a leader.  Just asking to clarify, and to make sure i understand you correctly, because it would be great if you told me i was wrong.  That would make me more likely to want to keep him since it would be one less hole to fill and we already have enough of them.  Not that my opinion matters in what the Cubs do, but you know what I mean.

When Soto initially came up to stay, he SEEMED to have great leadership potential.  Very take charge, doing a great job of keeping teammates on defense with their head in the game and helping position them, and in helping pitchers stay or get focused, with no reluctance to head out to the mound to argue with Zambrano or anyone else.

Now?  I don't see it any more.  It seems to have faded more each season, which may be a factor of the entire clubhouse atmosphere on the team and the overall lack of visible effort from team stars.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 08, 2011, 07:39:43 pm
I read somewhere earlier that TB may be interested in bringing Pena back.

Archer, Guyer, Fuld, Lee and Chirinos and they've got a deal.

If they had been interested earlier today, the Cubs could even have thrown in Fernando Perez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 08, 2011, 07:45:17 pm
When Soto initially came up to stay, he SEEMED to have great leadership potential.  Very take charge, doing a great job of keeping teammates on defense with their head in the game and helping position them, and in helping pitchers stay or get focused, with no reluctance to head out to the mound to argue with Zambrano or anyone else.

Now?  I don't see it any more.  It seems to have faded more each season, which may be a factor of the entire clubhouse atmosphere on the team and the overall lack of visible effort from team stars.

I just realize they starred "mary jane" but i'm assuming everyone knew what i meant there.

That is sort of my assessment as well.  I suppose that could point to Soto as guy, who, when he has strong leadership to look up to, will keep his head on straight and play the game right.  On the flip side of that, when he doesn't have someone demanding his respect and to stay on his toes, he becomes out of shape and loses his head.  Or, it is maybe that when the team is constantly losing, he loses that adrenaline pump and becomes disinterested, and no matter who it is in the clubhouse demanding every one bust their butt, it will not make a hill of beans.  I think it's probably the former rather than the latter because he showed up to spring training fat and out of shape the year after the cubs made the playoffs if i remember correctly.  That off-season, there was plenty to look forward toward and a realistic goal to work one's butt off to attain.

I guess someone could call playing .450 baseball a realistic goal, too, but that's not something i would want to admit to if i was a player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 08, 2011, 08:42:57 pm
I wonder how much Pujols or Fielder want to go the 29th place team and with limited prospect for major improvement.  I suppose if you're a great player, you figure that you alone will transform a 29th place team to 15th at least, so maybe it would make sense to them.  But with a currently woeful farm situation, a bad rotation, and no young pitching in sight, I struggle to think that Pujols in his 30's should want to be part of a rebuilding program.

Those who rip the Cubs for the Soriano contract would be well advised to remember this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2011, 09:16:17 pm
Kurcz: 1-2/3 - 0-0-0-1-4 ,  ( 18 K's / 4 BB in 11-2/3 IP out of the pen)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_08_chaafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2011, 09:40:29 pm
Jackson: 6-7-2-2-3-8

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_08_iowaaa_nozaaa_1

Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_08_belafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 08, 2011, 09:50:29 pm
Jackson: 6-7-2-2-3-8


I know Jackson has fallen far the last few years and he has always had attitude issues, but is there any point at all in holding out reasonable hope he may one day be a contributing player?  I was sure at one time that he was going to be a middle of the rotation starter, and I held a sliver of hope that he might be something more.  Now, he probably has a better chance of switching positions and becoming a future hall of fame 5 tool centerfielder than making the majors for more than an emergency spot start as a pitcher.  I keep waiting on some injury report and there has just never been one.  He puzzles me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 10:22:26 pm
You beat me to it.  I wouldn't rule out the possiblilty of Jackson becoming a middle reliever, but before too long they should look at moving him to the outfield.  Several scouts felt he had better potential as a hitter than as a pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2011, 11:32:55 pm
Easterling is off to a pretty good start in Mesa.  Dub Kim, on the other hand, is really struggling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2011, 11:50:16 pm
Golden: 0-2, RBI, 2 BB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_08_eveasx_boiasx_1


Zapata: 2-4, 2B, RBI, K

Pichardo: 3-0-0-0-1-4 , ( 28 K's in 17 IP in the DSL )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_08_brrrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2011, 12:33:16 am
Tennessee suspended after midnight in a tie game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 09, 2011, 12:43:00 am
Not exactly.  You said that you didn't think he would get a 10 year contract.  My question was, if, in spite of your belief, he held out for 10 years at 30 million, would you sign him or let him pass?

Actually, I didn't say anything about would he would get. But, I used the word "silly" in reference to giving him a 10-year contract., so you should be able to figure out what I think about that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 06:44:36 am
Only if we forget all of the other silly things you supported....

So, in spite of your belief, if he held out for 10 years at 30 million, would you sign him or let him pass?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 07:59:37 am
Golden: 0-2, RBI, 2 BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_08_eveasx_boiasx_1

Lot of difference between Golden's first ten and last ten games and I hope it's real improvement rather than just small sample size.  The strike outs are what give me some measure of hope. 
               
               ba        ab        h         2b     3b      hr      rbi      bb       k        obp       .slg       ops       babip
first 10-   .278      36       10        1       2       0        3        6       12       .381      .417     .798       .417
last 10-   .333      33        11        2       0       1        5       10       6       .488       .485     .973       .385

One thing i did notice is he has a very fluky babip, which his mesa numbers last year also support.  There, he had 7 k's along with 5 hits in 15 at bats for an astounding .625 babip in an ultra small sample size.  As for the K reduction and abnormally high babip?  Perhaps he kills fastballs but has trouble with breaking stuff, but in his last ten games or so he is beginning to learn how to either recognize and lay off it or hit it?   I understand the babip isn't sustainable, but I hope it means when he makes contact he at least squares up on the ball can drive it.  I don't think a ground ball stroke would give him those numbers without blazing speed.  I figured up the first ten game numbers myself, so forgive me if I made i mistake.

I also think if his learning curve continues as it has this year, he might be a real prospect and worthy of that second round choice.  After all of Arizona Phil's horrendous reports, i'm just glad to see what looks like progress in a guy who clearly has the tools to be a plus player.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 08:02:39 am
The line for the first 10 games is not exactly horrible.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 08:36:36 am
The line for the first 10 games is not exactly horrible.

I agree it isn't, but the strike out rate was and the really high babip was the only thing that made it appear decent.  And, I'm not sure that his babip is sustainable at higher levels to the degree his is sitting at, and maybe not at that level. However, I do hope it is an indicator that he might always be above average in that area and has a nice line drive stroke.  It is also nice that he is willing to take a walk.

I mainly did that layout to show how much he has improved this year.  From striking out in 47% of his at bats last year, to Arizona Phil talking about how terrible he was in spring, to a 33% k rate his first ten games, to a 18% k rate his last ten.  It is small sample sizes, so it remains to be seen whether he can come close to maintaining it.  I just think guys with above average tools who can learn things and quickly apply it are the guys that have a chance to be special.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 08:44:47 am
6 walks in 36 ABs also helped.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 09, 2011, 08:51:44 am
Golden has one HR, not two. 

He's been a pleasant surprise.  I figured he'd be a Harvey/Mallory type K-king, and a prime risk to be an utter bust, based on how overmatched he was in XST.  So he's been a really delightful surprise, and the reduction in his K-rate recently has been very encouraging. 

Way too soon to know.  Maybe he's really gifted, he's settling in and figuring things out, and he's not going to be that bad of a whiffer, he's going to always be a great walker, and in time he'll blossom into a productive HR hitter. 

HR's is obviously pivotal.  What is acceptable in terms of K's depends on how many HR's and walks you take to counterbalance.  HR's can justify a lot of K's and some extra HR's can float BA and OPS.  He seemed to scout as a power guy, so my hope is that in eventual time he'll be a true HR hitter.     

Often K-guys go in and out.  There have been brief periods where Brett Jackson wouldn't K as much, and I'd think that perhaps he was turning a corner on that problem and was improve from awful to merely bad.  But one awful week per month is enough to keep the overall rate bad.  We'll see how that goes with Golden. 

But I'm thrilled with how it's gone for him thus far, other than the limited power the rest has all been way better than I would have considered realistic to wish for if you'd asked me a month ago. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 08:56:46 am
6 walks in 36 ABs also helped.

oh yeah, which is a walk rate i would be happy with in just about any prospect, but even that he improved over the last ten games, with 10 in 33 at bats.  And, besides his strike out rate, I wasn't trying to say he had a lousy first ten games so i hope your not taking it that way, I was just trying to show how much he had improved across the board and from what Arizona Phil observed in spring training.  Of course, numbers can only tell you so much, and he still might look lost out there, but I hope not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 09, 2011, 09:14:46 am
Angel Mejias made his debut yesterday, two perfect innings. 

He was one of the 6-figure signings from last year that BA reported.  Candeleri and Baez and Penalver and Santana have all started very well, Sanchez hasn't, but Mejias is the one had not played yet.  They didn't list his specific bonus, so probably it was somewhere below $350. 

With all the others playing a bunch, and him being a pitcher, I'd suspected injury.  So the fact that he pitched, not just for one but for two innings, and was perfect is very nice. 

Listed as a slender 6'3" lefty who'd touched up to 90, obviously the reports being from when he was 16 or younger,he's 17 now. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 10:02:37 am
Golden has one HR, not two. 

He's been a pleasant surprise.  I figured he'd be a Harvey/Mallory type K-king, and a prime risk to be an utter bust, based on how overmatched he was in XST.  So he's been a really delightful surprise, and the reduction in his K-rate recently has been very encouraging. 

Way too soon to know.  Maybe he's really gifted, he's settling in and figuring things out, and he's not going to be that bad of a whiffer, he's going to always be a great walker, and in time he'll blossom into a productive HR hitter. 

HR's is obviously pivotal.  What is acceptable in terms of K's depends on how many HR's and walks you take to counterbalance.  HR's can justify a lot of K's and some extra HR's can float BA and OPS.  He seemed to scout as a power guy, so my hope is that in eventual time he'll be a true HR hitter.     

Often K-guys go in and out.  There have been brief periods where Brett Jackson wouldn't K as much, and I'd think that perhaps he was turning a corner on that problem and was improve from awful to merely bad.  But one awful week per month is enough to keep the overall rate bad.  We'll see how that goes with Golden. 

But I'm thrilled with how it's gone for him thus far, other than the limited power the rest has all been way better than I would have considered realistic to wish for if you'd asked me a month ago. 

oops, yeah, you're right...slugging and ops are still correct though because i just copied them from his page.  Was the first ten games i had to figure up.

And you express things a lot more eloquently than i do(guess they stress those writing classes a lot more for chemistry guys than engineering guys  lol), but everything you typed is pretty close to what i have thought. 

When he was scouted, he was described as very raw, so he is a guy that growing pains were to be expected from.  But showing up fat and out shape was not a good thing and I couldn't help but question his work ethic.  Generally a lazy guy is going to stay a lazy guy, and an overweight guy at a young age is always going to have weight problems, but hopefully it was just youthful mistakes and as he matures, he puts those problems behind him.  As long as he stays away from the lazy habits, I expect him to be a big, strong guy and think the homeruns will eventually come.  The thing i like is it looks as if he might learn how to be a plus hitter in the meantime, especially if his babip strength isn't a fluke and he is always above average in that area.  18% k rate(that could still improve) + home runs that should come + high babip + high walk rate = a very, very good middle of the order hitter.  Hopefully the next 30+ at bats are more like the last ten games than the first and maybe a little better as he gets more comfortable.

Odds are he never amounts to anything, but his rapid improvement gives me hope that he has an above average ability to learn and apply baseball skills and that he will be able to get the most out of all those raw, natural tools.  After all, we are way past due for one of those cursed second round picks to actually do something.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 09, 2011, 11:19:22 am
Agree on all points.  (As is usually true, I think we analyze things very similarly.) 

With K-rates, I often kind of use 20% as a cutoff.  If a guy is under 20% K's, and hits some HR's, his average will be fine. 

If he's more in the 25% K-rate area, he's going to need a lot of HR's (and/or walks) to keep his BA/OBP good. 

If a guy is K'ing near 20% but doesn't get HR hits, his batting average will be problematic. 

If a guy is below 15% K-rate, and especially if he's down towards 10%, he can hit for solid average even without many HR's.  That's the Barney/Pierre/Lemahieu batting average model.   

Obviously we are all more sophisticated than just looking at batting average.  And obviously how much IsoP and IsoD is added determines whether a guy with a certain batting average is valuable or not.  But I think batting average, old-fashioned as it may be, is still really useful and central, that's the basis.  It's the primary source of OBP, and every hit counts toward both OBP and slugging.  Low-BA guys have a hard time lasting as asset regulars.  (Pena is an unusual case.) 

I also think that K-rate means more in the minors than the majors.  If a big-leaguer K's but has enough IsoD/IsoP to give a net useful OPS, no problem.   But in the minors, I think a high K-rate can be a scouting red-flag that the guy has some problems.  Big-league scouting and big-league pitchers have a way of attacking and exposing a hitter's problems to a heightened degree.  In general I've always thought that contact hitters have much less difficulty with promotion, but guys who K a lot and who have significant contact problems at one level, always are more at risk that even a single promotion level will hieghten and expose those problems. 

Hopefully Brett Jackson will get past my issues:  I'm hoping that whatever problems he has, that they don't get intensified in the majors, and that he'll end up hitting enough HR's so that his batting average can float, and so that he'll have enough IsoP as well as IsoD to make him very valuable without need for the kinds of averages that are expected from other players.  Likewise I'm hoping that golden really is getting settled in, that he doesn't have any unfixable problems that will get increasingly exposed with time and promotion, and that his IsoD and IsoP will both be so excellent that they will more than outweigh his K's even if his K-rate is kind of high. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 09, 2011, 12:44:53 pm
Lot of difference between Golden's first ten and last ten games and I hope it's real improvement rather than just small sample size.  The strike outs are what give me some measure of hope. 
               
               ba        ab        h         2b     3b      hr      rbi      bb       k        obp       .slg       ops       babip
first 10-   .278      36       10        1       2       0        3        6       12       .381      .417     .798       .417
last 10-   .333      33        11        2       0       2        5       10       6       .488       .485     .973      ..440

One thing i did notice is he has a very fluky babip, which his mesa numbers last year also support.  There, he had 7 k's along with 5 hits in 15 at bats for an astounding .625 babip in an ultra small sample size.  As for the K reduction and abnormally high babip?  Perhaps he kills fastballs but has trouble with breaking stuff, but in his last ten games or so he is beginning to learn how to either recognize and lay off it or hit it?   I understand the babip isn't sustainable, but I hope it means when he makes contact he at least squares up on the ball can drive it.  I don't think a ground ball stroke would give him those numbers without blazing speed.  I figured up the first ten game numbers myself, so forgive me if I made i mistake.

I also think if his learning curve continues as it has this year, he might be a real prospect and worthy of that second round choice.  After all of Arizona Phil's horrendous reports, i'm just glad to see what looks like progress in a guy who clearly has the tools to be a plus player.



That second BABIP is not calculated correctly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 09, 2011, 12:47:06 pm
The Futures game will be on ESPN2 Sunday at 5:00 P.M. Chicago time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 12:53:46 pm
Obviously we are all more sophisticated than just looking at batting average.

Speak fer yerself, college boy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 12:54:46 pm
That second BABIP is not calculated correctly.

Yeah, should be .423 i believe.  Craig noticed I had erroneously put 2 homeruns for him and should be 1.  Guess I should have went back and edited it, but will do so now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 09, 2011, 01:01:23 pm
Yeah, should be .423 i believe.  Craig noticed I had erroneously put 2 homeruns for him and should be 1.  Guess I should have went back and edited it, but will do so now.

If one HR instead of two is the only difference, it's .385.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2011, 01:27:28 pm
What surprised me most, in light of ArizonaPhil's comments about how fat he was, is the 4 stolen bases (0 caught stealing) in 20 games, along with 2 triples.  I envisioned another Harry Chiti, or at least a Sosa on the base paths.  From another source, I was told that Golden was certainly stocky, but was much more muscular than fat.

I have also been told that he is fairly good at pitch recognition, but still not very good at hitting breaking pitches, even in the strike zone, unless they are at least waist high.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 09, 2011, 01:32:39 pm
...not very good at hitting breaking pitches, even in the strike zone, unless they are at least waist high.

Few are.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 01:50:55 pm
If one HR instead of two is the only difference, it's .385.

You are right...i just realized what I was doing....one of those red dot errors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 09, 2011, 01:54:25 pm
 Matt Szczur goes from Peoria to Daytona after the Futures game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 02:17:10 pm
Very encouraging. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 09, 2011, 02:23:16 pm
I have also been told that he is fairly good at pitch recognition, but still not very good at hitting breaking pitches, even in the strike zone, unless they are at least waist high.

Neither can any of the major league Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 09, 2011, 02:26:59 pm
Another move

Lefty Brent Ebinger will be bumped up to AA Tennessee from Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 02:33:10 pm
Matt Szczur goes from Peoria to Daytona after the Futures game.

I'm glad the Cubs had enough faith in him to promote him, but I'm curious to see how he handles it.  After splitting time between football and baseball in college, and this being his first full year playing only baseball, I had thought they might not challenge him too much this year and leave him at one level.  With baseball such a repetition based sport, if he does have a new swing this year, I hope he has gotten comfortable with it.  Moving up a level and being challenged for someone who's swing isn't second nature could lead to some second guessing and bad habits instead of just trusting in his swing and learning to adjust.  I realize swing alterations happen all the time, but generally those players have much more experience to fall back on or they are new to the system spending time in Mesa, or such.  Of course, I could just be over-analyzing. In fact, I think I probably am. 

Concerning his swing, I remember posters on here saying he had a very odd swing, and it would probably need a good bit of alteration.  Did that happen, or is he still using his college swing?  I'd love to know.  If he doesn't have a new swing, then challenge away.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 03:02:27 pm
Concerning his swing, I remember posters on here saying he had a very odd swing, and it would probably need a good bit of alteration.

My memory is that folks also used to comment somewhat on the swings of Clemente and Musial, though success finally wore down the doubters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 03:35:55 pm
My memory is that folks also used to comment somewhat on the swings of Clemente and Musial, though success finally wore down the doubters.

My memory doesn't go that for back.  lol

I just remember some people saying it would be very hard for him to have any power at all with his swing, and there may have been a Baseball America guy saying the same thing.  Considering he had no homers last year, started out the year as a singles machine(no homers in april) and has added power(granted not a ton, with 2 in may and 3 in june) as the year progressed, I had assumed that his swing must have undergone the alteration it needed to add power.  I have no idea if it actually has, however.

Also, when I was saying I thought they might go conservatively with him, I was just talking about this year.  I would have considered a late season promotion along the conservative track as well.

He does seem to have the personality to not let temporary failure get to him, so I'm sure that factored into the decision.  Plus, he seems to be an excellent athlete with great coordination, the kind of guy that can adopt to change quickly. 

As a fan, I'm glad they promoted him because I want to see how he does at a higher level. 

I actually almost deleted the message you replied to as soon as i posted it because all it is is basically conjecture.  For all I know, two or three months could be plenty of time to have a new swing replace the one you've been using for years and to become second nature at the minor league level.  The only thing i know for sure is old habits are hard to break.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2011, 03:59:14 pm
"I actually almost deleted the message you replied to as soon as i posted it because all it is is basically conjecture."

If by conjecture, you mean giving wild ass opinions based upon nothing but ignorance and arrogance, we would have an empty board if everyone followed that standard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 04:07:30 pm
Dave beat me to it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 09, 2011, 04:08:00 pm
"I actually almost deleted the message you replied to as soon as i posted it because all it is is basically conjecture."

If by conjecture, you mean giving wild ass opinions based upon nothing but ignorance and arrogance, we would have an empty board if everyone followed that standard.

Not sure.  You'd be gone, sure of that.  Just not sure of how many others.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 04:43:57 pm
"I actually almost deleted the message you replied to as soon as i posted it because all it is is basically conjecture."

If by conjecture, you mean giving wild ass opinions based upon nothing but ignorance and arrogance, we would have an empty board if everyone followed that standard.

lmao, yeah, even after I put that, i realized just about 90% of the posts here(basically everything but the box scores) is conjecture of some kind and wondered who would bring that up and how; I just didn't think it would be so painfully and truthfully done   hehe...my post, however, was conjecture based on more conjecture.  There has to be a line somewhere and basing conjecture on conjecture might just be it for me.  I think i'll strive to stick to one level of it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2011, 05:14:02 pm
I hate it when Jes is right.

But he must be if he agrees with me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 09, 2011, 05:25:29 pm
Two more pitchers added to the Tennessee roster

RHP Oswaldo Martinez from Daytona
RHP Ramon Garcia from AZL
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2011, 05:57:48 pm
Ramon Garcia is a 20-year-old up from Mesa, presumably for emergency duty. He got the loss in today's completion of last night's suspended affair.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_08_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 09, 2011, 06:13:37 pm
I'm not thrilled with the Szczur promotion.  He's been struggling some lately, IMO.  Yes, he's hit some HR's, so he's not been totally power-deficient.  But I don't think he's Mr. Power yet.  Early on I was thrilled when he went on a stolen base binge, but he hasn't been stealing at all for the last 6 weeks, and when he's tried he's been bad.  He was walking at a pretty decent rate early, more recently he's settled into a typical cub sub-average walk rate. 

Maybe he needs a new challenge.  But if he produces like he has recently, he could look pretty poor at Daytona. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 06:27:29 pm
I'm not thrilled with the Szczur promotion.  He's been struggling some lately, IMO.  Yes, he's hit some HR's, so he's not been totally power-deficient.  But I don't think he's Mr. Power yet.  Early on I was thrilled when he went on a stolen base binge, but he hasn't been stealing at all for the last 6 weeks, and when he's tried he's been bad.  He was walking at a pretty decent rate early, more recently he's settled into a typical cub sub-average walk rate. 

Maybe he needs a new challenge.  But if he produces like he has recently, he could look pretty poor at Daytona. 


For his last 10 games -- .270/.325/.297/.622; 37 AB, 2 BB, 5K.  My guess is that the Cubs are looking at the entire season to date, and keeping in mind that while a .270 BA is not great, it is also not falling off the face of the earth, and 5K in 37 AB doesn't indicate a problem.  http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t443&t=p_pbp&pid=519333
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on July 09, 2011, 06:28:44 pm
Two more pitchers added to the Tennessee roster

RHP Oswaldo Martinez from Daytona
RHP Ramon Garcia from AZL

Actually it was Brent Ebinger and Garcia being promoted and Martinez went back to Daytona.....Haven't had time to go to any games in the past couple of weeks but am going to try and sneak out for tomorrows game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 09, 2011, 06:33:50 pm
Thanks
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2011, 06:34:56 pm
Pretty hefty promotion for a 20 year old with rather unimpressive stats.  Does anyone have a scouting report on him?

I agree that it is likely to be a very short stay in Tennessee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 06:41:04 pm
I'm not thrilled with the Szczur promotion.  He's been struggling some lately, IMO.  Yes, he's hit some HR's, so he's not been totally power-deficient.  But I don't think he's Mr. Power yet.  Early on I was thrilled when he went on a stolen base binge, but he hasn't been stealing at all for the last 6 weeks, and when he's tried he's been bad.  He was walking at a pretty decent rate early, more recently he's settled into a typical cub sub-average walk rate. 

Maybe he needs a new challenge.  But if he produces like he has recently, he could look pretty poor at Daytona. 

Yeah i actually started to bring up my concern about his July slump myself after that last post i made about him and his promotion, but I figured I had worn the Szczur topic out so decided against it.  His line for July is as follows.

ab        r        h         2b/3b/hr         rbi        bb       k        sb/cs        ba/slg          oba         ops
29        5       8          all are 0         1           2        3         1/1        .276             .344         .620

He has 0 extra base hits for the month of July...it isn't often I get to combine batting average and slugging percentage on a stat chart because they are the same, so I happily jumped at the opportunity. 

This definitely seems like the wrong time for a promotion.  I would much rather it had come when he was hitting the ball with at least some measure of authority.  And as far as his batting average is concerned, .276 isn't bad, but he has yet to hit under .300 for any month this year, so in the context of his monthly averages, it definitely isn't good.

If he has trouble after his call up, is it just a continuation of this slump, or is it because he is having trouble adjusting to pitching at the next level?  That is the worst thing about these sort of call up.

I've noticed the Cubs have done this to a more than a few players in the past, and i've never understood their rationale for it.  Surely, they must have some reasoning for it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 09, 2011, 06:52:39 pm
I've noticed the Cubs have done this to a more than a few players in the past, and i've never understood their rationale for it.  Surely, they must have some reasoning for it?

LOL
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2011, 06:55:22 pm
I have noticed it with Vitters in the past.  He started off slowly, went into a streak.  slumped again, and then was promoted.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 07:01:19 pm
Yeah i actually started to bring up my concern about his July slump myself after that last post i made about him and his promotion, but I figured I had worn the Szczur topic out so decided against it.

Ray, first you are concerned about posts which are little more than conjecture, and not about posting after a topic worn out....  You keep that up and you are never going to fit in....

Keep in mind that Szcuzr is being promoted after the break and the Futures game.  I suspect the Cubs feel he has progressed enough overall to handle the promotion, and that the effect of any "slump" will be countered by the break.

Whether that proves right or not is a different story.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 08:17:14 pm
edit---I feel sorry for whoever read this before i edited it...wrote it too fast and I couldn't even understand what i was saying when i got back on computer.  Some of it even looked like it was written in latin.

Ray, first you are concerned about posts which are little more than conjecture, and not about posting after a topic worn out....  You keep that up and you are never going to fit in....

Keep in mind that Szcuzr is being promoted after the break and the Futures game.  I suspect the Cubs feel he has progressed enough overall to handle the promotion, and that the effect of any "slump" will be countered by the break.

Whether that proves right or not is a different story.

That's a good point.  I've seen some of you carry on a debate for a year.  On some of them, I've gotten the feeling I was the only one still reading...well, besides the debaters. 

A little background on the wearing out thing-----When i decide I want to learn about something or some topic interests me, I just have a habit of going well beyond what people normally would discussing it, etc.  As you might guess, at some point, normal attention-spanned people who are engaged in conversation reach some threshold of time spent on a subject and get burned out, not wanting to hear another word about whatever the topic is.  As a result,  since not everyone is as fanatical discussing/debating topics and learning things as I am, I try to be respectful and remember to stop short of that burning out point.  That includes not continuing even if I have another addendum i think is interesting or relevant, like the July slump.  If something interests me, I can read or talk about it forever. 

That is true about the upcoming break.  I doubt Szczur is used to playing as much baseball as he has played this year either and the break will do him good.  Even last year was cut short because he had to worry bout being back for school and football.  It also gives him a little time to get settled into a new city, making for a natural point to be promoted.

.
I have noticed it with Vitters in the past.  He started off slowly, went into a streak.  slumped again, and then was promoted.

It could be only him, I just thought I remembered reading on here more than a couple times where people were wondering why someone was being promoted when they were in some sort of slump.  And, it would seem like, if the posters here catch some of them, there are probably many more they don't catch.  Of course, the times i remember could have just been every time Vitters was promoted, since it seems like 9 weeks out of 10 he is slumping. I do think it's happened with Jackson, too, but i'm not 100% sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2011, 09:25:46 pm
Jose Ceda having a dominant year as the Marlins' Triple-A closer:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_09_iowaaa_nozaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2011, 09:44:31 pm
Craig - the Peoria has Kirk going 6.1 innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 09, 2011, 09:50:49 pm
Heh, the box had Kirk going 9, but then they reduced it to 6.1.  Makes a lot more sense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2011, 10:00:27 pm
Kirk: 6-1/3 -7-2-1-1-5


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_09_peoafx_cedafx_1


Vitters: 2-3, HR, RBI, BB

Jackson: 0-4, BB, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_09_cngaax_tenaax_1


Daytona:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_09_chaafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 09, 2011, 10:02:01 pm
On some of them, I've gotten the feeling I was the only one still reading...well, besides the debaters.

You probably were.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2011, 10:29:19 pm
If you had closely read the posts, you would know that the debaters weren't really reading either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 09, 2011, 10:39:27 pm
Who are these master debaters?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 10:42:45 pm
You probably were.

I just figured eventually one of 'em(my money was always on scotty) was going to pull out all his hair and go mad.  I wanted to be able to say i was there for the whole thing.  That way i could get that coveted interview with espn/foxnews/cnn/nbc/oprah where I could tell the infamous story behind the story.

Oprah was actually the goal because i figured she could have hooked me up with some killer seats for a few Cubs games.  My theory is Al Gore invented the internet for that express reason, so that Oprah could eventually give me free tickets to Cubs game.  The man is truely all knowing and all seeing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 09, 2011, 11:30:18 pm
If you had closely read the posts, you would know that the debaters weren't really reading either.

That I believe.  I must admit, however, I mainly read all of it because I was curious who would eventually give up first and why.  My foremost theory was it would be the first that left the conscious world behind and existed only in body, but i guess I was wrong.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2011, 11:47:19 pm
Were you here for the great Scotti - Reb debate of 2001?  Or were you at least here in 2006, when it ended?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2011, 11:55:57 pm
Kim: 4-7-1-1-1-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_09_eveasx_boiasx_1


Sanchez: 1-4, SF, RBI, 3 K ,  ( 43 K in 116 AB's )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_09_dcurok_drdrok_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 12:48:38 am
Justin Bour hasn't walked in over 40 at-bats, and his OPS the past 6 weeks is roughly .640
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 10, 2011, 04:46:21 am
Time for a promotion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 10, 2011, 08:59:53 am
John Gaub back to his old tricks with four walks in two innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 10, 2011, 10:47:26 am
Were you here for the great Scotti - Reb debate of 2001?  Or were you at least here in 2006, when it ended?

I actually remember when scotti transferred from lurker to poster when he posted his top 30 prospects along with his notes.  I think it was craig that was the first to welcome him to the board and to post more often.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on July 10, 2011, 11:56:47 am
Sczur is one of the mainstays of the system and is on the fast track to Wrigley.  It's time to find out if he can handle high A.  If so, look for him at Wrigley in September 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 11:58:39 am
I don't think Daytona will determine how quickly Szczur makes it to the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 10, 2011, 11:58:55 am
I actually remember when scotti transferred from lurker to poster when he posted his top 30 prospects along with his notes.  I think it was craig that was the first to welcome him to the board and to post more often.

You mean all this time we were blaming Curt when it was really Craig's fault?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 10, 2011, 12:27:58 pm
You mean all this time we were blaming Curt when it was really Craig's fault?

I believe so...or am i misremembering?  I believe craig was wooed by his detailed prospect notes on that first post, as he added his top 30 to everyone elses.  I believe among those notes were a few that were new to the board even if most were just what he had learned here.  It has been a long time though, so not going to say i'm 100% sure i'm right in that it was craig.  I do remember for sure him starting out the post saying he was a longtime lurker.

But, yes, i do believe craig can be blamed for being the first to ask scotty to transfer from lurker to poster.  Thus, he is at fault for the great scotty-reb debates that singlehandedly began the downfall of worldcrossing.  The resulting high bandwidth consumption as the world tuned in to see who would finally emerge victorious was just too much for the floundering forum to overcome.  RIP worldcrossing, thou fell at craig's hands.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 10, 2011, 12:29:16 pm
Matt Szczur talks about the Futures game

http://atmlb.com/pkd4Wd (http://atmlb.com/pkd4Wd)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 10, 2011, 12:29:18 pm
My recollection is that Scotti was not his original username.

Dave, did you get an email from me?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 10, 2011, 12:35:16 pm
My recollection is that Scotti was not his original username.

Dave, did you get an email from me?

Really?  Maybe i'm wrong then...you've gotten me to wondering now.  Main reason I remember that post though is because i debated on posting my own top 30 at the time but decided against it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 10, 2011, 01:42:14 pm

But, yes, i do believe craig can be blamed for being the first to ask scotty to transfer from lurker to poster.  Thus, he is at fault for the great scotty-reb debates that singlehandedly began the downfall of worldcrossing.  The resulting high bandwidth consumption as the world tuned in to see who would finally emerge victorious was just too much for the floundering forum to overcome.  RIP worldcrossing, thou fell at craig's hands.

And people think he is harmless just because he is from North Dakota.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 10, 2011, 01:49:04 pm
I don't think Daytona will determine how quickly Szczur makes it to the majors.

The comment was that if Szczur does well in Daytona the rest of this year, he will probably make it to the majors by September of 2012.  If he does do well in Daytona the rest of this year, they he would almost certainly start next year at least in Tennessee, and if handles a mid-season promotion well this year, that could bode well for handling mid-season promotions in general, such as from Tennessee to Iowa next year.

He may not make it to the majors by September of 2012, but doing well in Daytona (at least well enough for a promotion at the start of next year) would be pretty important to that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 01:57:25 pm
Doing well in Daytona won't have any impact on what he will do at the more difficult levels. If he were being promoted to Tennessee and excelled, that comment would be more valid, imo.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 10, 2011, 01:58:51 pm
I think it was Zambrano who was an extremely popular figure with his team mates on his last rehab assignment.  I took the whole team out to dinner in him, every day he was there.

Having known many minor leaguers personally, I can vouch for how popular this would make him.  A big break from the McDonalds and Burger Kings that make up their normal cuisine.

They eat a lot better than that.They have food catered to them every day and they also have all the food they could ever want in the locker rooms at all times.

They do eat much better when the big leaguers are there but they aint doing without that's for sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 10, 2011, 02:04:45 pm
Doing well in Daytona won't have any impact on what he will do at the more difficult levels. If he were being promoted to Tennessee and excelled, that comment would be more valid, imo.


Doing well in Daytona is essential to him REACHING the more difficult levels.

If he can't hit more than .230 in Daytona, he will never reach those levels.  And if he does not do well in Daytona the rest of this season, he likely would start 2012 back there, and the prospect for him reaching Wrigley by September of 2012 would be seriously reduced.

Hard to understand any argument otherwise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 10, 2011, 02:08:49 pm
Doing well in Daytona may not have any impact on what he will do at more difficult levels, but doing bad enough at Daytona that he has to start there again next season will very likely delay his progress.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 02:14:00 pm
Quote
Doing well in Daytona is essential to him REACHING the more difficult levels.

Besides that not being what Clark originally asserted, it's not even true. Ask Josh Vitters among others.

You are, again, moving goal posts just to argue.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 10, 2011, 02:14:18 pm
There's a full half of July left when Szcur starts at Daytona, and all of August.  And I don't recall, but even though Daytona is horrible now, I assume they might have been a first-half playoff team, based on the great start thanks to the early Bour/Whitenack/Rosscup/Ha brilliance, so they might get some September playoff action too.  So if he jumps right in successfully there, and does well the whole time, that's a pretty large chunk of the minor-league season left at Daytona.  IF Szczur is ready to be quite good relative to FSL, success there could certainly justify the expectancy of opening next year at Tennessee, and if he rolls there right from the start, he might indeed be plausibly positioned for Wrigley in August or September of 2012. 

Byrd could be on an expiring contract, so he could be a guy you'd be looking to do be a guy you'd look to trade next July, with Szczur a possibility to replace him. 

But, that's all assuming the Szczur is good enough to fast-track advance like that.  The no-walk-no-steals Szczur we've seen for the last 6 weeks might not merit all that, unless he either hits for a lot more power or a lot more average than he's shown recently.  If Szcur doesn't walk, doesn't steal, and doens't power, I'm not sure he's going to hit for enough average to be stepping up all that quickly to the majors. 

Or at least to successful life in the majors.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 02:18:04 pm
Quote
but doing bad enough at Daytona that he has to start there again next season will very likely delay his progress.

Dave, doing poorly at any level can theoretically delay one's progress. But the comment I responded to was that if Szczur did well at Dayonta we'd see him with the Cubs in a little over a year, and I don't think one leads to the other at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 10, 2011, 02:50:04 pm
Dave, doing poorly at any level can theoretically delay one's progress. But the comment I responded to was that if Szczur did well at Dayonta we'd see him with the Cubs in a little over a year, and I don't think one leads to the other at all.

Perhaps that was the comment you responded to, but in your response, what you wrote, which does not come close to ringing true.  Your initial response was I don't think Daytona will determine how quickly Szczur makes it to the majors.

As to Vitters, he repeated Daytona because he did poorly his first half season there.  When he repeated, he was hitting .291 with an OPS of .795 when he was promoted.  Those are not bad numbers for someone still younger than most of his competition.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 10, 2011, 02:51:34 pm
Besides that not being what Clark originally asserted, it's not even true. Ask Josh Vitters among others.

You are, again, moving goal posts just to argue.

Not at all.  I was responding to what YOU had posted.  You posted "Doing well in Daytona won't have any impact on what he will do at the more difficult levels. If he were being promoted to Tennessee and excelled, that comment would be more valid, imo."

To that I responded by writing, "Doing well in Daytona is essential to him REACHING the more difficult levels."

This was not "moving goal posts," but responding to what you had posted right before me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 03:01:17 pm
Perhaps that was the comment you responded to, but in your response, what you wrote, which does not come close to ringing true.

What?


Those are not bad numbers for someone still younger than most of his competition.

If you say so.  Of course, not quite sure how "not bad numbers for someone still younger than most of his competition" in a second stint in the league equals succeeding enough to be promoted, but then you can parse anything.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 10, 2011, 03:04:09 pm
Peralta starting out well for Peoria.   


Cabrera has reduced his ERA to 7.00 with five shutout innings with Iowa today. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 03:11:54 pm
For the record, Josh Vitters was awful in his first stint in Daytona and improved to incredibly mediocre his second time through.

That second stint included an empty .291 average and a walk rate of one every 13.75 at-bats, plus no reported improvement on defense. His K rate went up 75% as well. That performance, over a whole 110 AB's, was apparently enough to get him promoted to AA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 04:00:55 pm
Iowa:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_10_iowaaa_nozaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 05:35:58 pm
Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_10_peoafx_cedafx_1


Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on July 10, 2011, 06:00:38 pm
Bubba Starling is in Lincoln to up the ante with the Royals.  Word on my husker boards is Starling wants 8 million to sign and so fafr the Royals have come in at 6.2 million.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 10, 2011, 06:14:34 pm
They will sign him.  He is a home state hero, and will fill enough seats to pay for his bonus.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 06:15:04 pm
Futures Game observation:


How the hell did Tampa's Matt Moore last until the 8th round?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on July 10, 2011, 06:20:19 pm
Matt Szcur will be interviewed in the next half inning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 10, 2011, 06:21:20 pm
All they will ask him is about the bone marrow transplant.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on July 10, 2011, 06:32:49 pm
Yep
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 07:16:09 pm
Didn't see much of Szczur at the plate but he sure runs hard and fast. Kind of a bigger, thicker Campana. And he showed good range in center on a line out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 10, 2011, 08:00:31 pm
When I saw Ceasar last year with Peoria, he went after long fly balls like a wide receiver, catching the ball over his shoulder like a receiver, rather than turning around to catch the ball facing the infield.  Reminded me a little bit of Edm0nds in that respect.

Didn't see him come in for any balls, which was the staple of Edm0nds.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 08:08:40 pm
Edmonds always played incredibly shallow.

Szczur pretty much played his catch today as you describe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2011, 08:09:33 pm
Beliveau: 1-3-3-3-0-1 , 3 HR

Vitters: 0-2, 2 BB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_10_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on July 10, 2011, 09:11:16 pm
Back from an extremely warm evening at Smokies Park and I have not been more disappointed in along time as I am now.....Basically what I saw was the most heartless effort from a bunch of kids that couldn't care less what happens to the team as long as they are performing and those kids didn't perform either. Brett Jackson is a lazy premadonna, he can't hit now and it seems to be in his head as his average is surging towards the mendoza line and his attitude seems to be going with it....Vitters hit a couple of balls on the screws only to be right at someone and finally managed to play a game at 3rd and not commit an error....On a positive note Ryan Searle made a heck of a start sans a few walks with 5+ innings of 1 hit ball with I think 9ks....Beliveau was completely rocked giving up back to back to back hrs with 2 of them being moonshots....Also Mariano Duncan got into a verbal altercation with Chattanooga's manger and ejected and then threatened to beat the living crap out of an umpire inviting him to meet him in the parking lot after the game...It was very eventful and yet another disappointing loss....I'm heading back out tomorrow night, and hopefully they can win atleast one game in ther series.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 10, 2011, 09:17:10 pm
Wow.  Was Jiggs there, too?  Like to hear his report.  Anyone else there?  JR?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on July 10, 2011, 09:30:09 pm
Not sure what the deal was tonight...Searle was pitching very well topping out at 91 I believe at one point and was exhausted during the 6th from the 95+ degree heat and they just left him in too long, he walked the bags full at that time leading 3-0 with 2 outs. They brought in Kevin Rhoderick who immediately got a fly out to leave the bags full, then he had a rough inning giving up 2 hits and 2 runs leaving with the bases full and 1 out...Beliveau came in and first pitch induced a fly ball for an out and Chattanooga scored a run on that. Then worked a K to get out of that inning. That's when he self imploded giving up big flys to Scott Van Slyke, Travis Denker and Ivan Ochoa....Jackson went 0-4 with a walk and run scored....Other news and notes lots of movement of the guys that were just called up all being sent back to where they came from and Dolis coming back off the DL....Matt Spencer has slimmed way down and looks like a ballplayer now rather than a middle linebacker and has gained some speed. Another note, Steve Clevenger is becoming the leader of this team and will make a hell of a coach/manager when he chooses to do so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 10, 2011, 09:56:42 pm
Random stats about Tennessee guys...  (anything in parenthesis is ops)

Josh Vitters hits much better with men on base.  In 150 ab's with the bases empty, he's hitting .227(.646).  In 119 ab's with runners on, he's at .346(.899) and with men in scoring position, he's hitting a robust .368(.969) in 76 ab's.  I know there is some debate about whether or not clutch factor in baseball is real, but, if it is real, Vitters at least has a chance to have it.  Hopefully, he finishes out strong in that department.

One other Vitters stat may foretell his doom at wrigley.  Thankfully, it's a really small sample size and means nothing.  In 48 at bats during day games, he is only hitting .229.  The thing about his day stat line that caught my eye is he only has 2 strikeouts, giving him a nice low 4.2% strikeout rate.  Between 2 k's and 2 hr's, he has a seriously low babip of .205.  I'm guessing all those times he was hitting with men in scoring position must have been at night.

To be a right-handed hitter, Jae-Hoon Ha has a fairly large lefty/righty split going the wrong way.  He's batting .221(.613) vs lefties and .295(.780) against righties.  He does have an excellent to passable K rate either way.  11.4% against righties and 19.1% against lefties.  I'm curious how often hitters have reverse splits like that to such a large extent.

Ryan Flaherty is another guy that might possess the clutch factor, if it exists.  Bases empty-.279, runners on-.324, scoring position-.365.  As with Vitters, hope it holds up.

One thing that was evident as I made my way through all the guys that were actual “prospects” was how much nicer the strikeout rates looked than they did 4, 5 or 10 years ago of the guys that were considered the “prospects”.  I was pleasantly surprised by quite a few of their strikeout totals.

Next two don't really mean anything but put them anyway....actually not sure if any of it does, but....

Steve Clevenger has one of the bigger home and away splits.  .357(.898) at home and .248(.751) away.  A 109 point swing is a lot.  Not as big a swing but against righties, he hit .314(.880) and against lefties he batted .246(.652).  I put all of that to say I bet he hammers right-handed pitching at home.

If Junior Lake could learn to hit on the road, he would be having a pretty decent start at Tennessee.  While he is hitting .210(.588) overall, he is hitting .273(.770) at home and .156(.428) on the road.  New league and only 17 games both home and away so that ought to even out in time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 10, 2011, 11:03:57 pm
Wellington Cruz with 5 more shutout innings.  He's been pretty good.  Pugilese allows his first run and first off outing. 

Easterling is 3-3 at the moment, and after going 0-3 in his debut, he's 9-14 since.  Nice to see a hot start.  I wonder how they'll promote him.  Go to Boise, and play left?  Go to Boise, and bump Chen up to Peoria?  Or given his age, just jump him straight to Peoria, and leave Chen at Boise?  That's what I'd do.  With Szczur gone, Peoria has no outfielders (Silva and ??? ?), so he could find a spot there. 


Mesa's lineup is kind of good.  Of the first six guys, all are over .300 and Durrence at .321 and Zapata .347(.431 OBP) are the only ones below .375.  I did find it interesting that Zapata had been playing center and leading off, and hitting well, walking a ton, and stealing.  But he got bumped out of both center and leadoff when Easterling came along.  Perhaps reflects their relative values in the Cubs minds.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 10, 2011, 11:27:02 pm
Cruz did give up a run, but a good outing none the less.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2011, 12:35:13 am
Amaya: 3-5, 2B, RBI

Hernandez: 3-3, SF, 2 RBI, BB, SB

Geiger: 3-5, 2B, 4 RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_10_pdrrok_cubrok_1


Hoilman: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, 2 K

Cruz: 5-3-1-1-2-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_10_eveasx_boiasx_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2011, 01:25:17 am
Ben Badler's observation from the Futures Game:


Matt Szczur now in CF. Guy looks like he could deadlift a school bus if he wanted to
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 11, 2011, 09:03:29 am
Ive only been to 5 Smokies games all year.

Im just way too busy to go these days.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 11, 2011, 10:35:01 am
Is "school bus" Hendry's new nickname?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 11, 2011, 11:08:38 am
Is "school bus" Hendry's new nickname?

"Short bus" would be more appropriate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on July 11, 2011, 01:34:38 pm
Current heat index in Sevierville, TN 103.....Sounds like a fun evening for Smokies baseball huh?  :o
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on July 11, 2011, 01:41:12 pm
Flying to Columbus SC tonight.  I dont even want to know what the temp will be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 11, 2011, 01:52:43 pm
It's currently 58 degrees here in San Francisco.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 11, 2011, 01:54:50 pm
What was it when I was there in January?  About 52?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2011, 02:19:29 pm
Mark Twain's famous line was that the coldest winter he had ever spent anywhere was a summer in San Francisco.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 11, 2011, 02:44:39 pm
What was it when I was there in January?  About 52?
High temperatures in San Francisco in January are typically in the low to mid 50s, Curt.  That's about what it was when you were here IIRC.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 11, 2011, 02:45:51 pm
Mark Twain's famous line was that the coldest winter he had ever spent anywhere was a summer in San Francisco.
I live 20 minutes south of SF where the high temperature is typically 20 degrees warmer during the summer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2011, 02:49:35 pm
Gibbs: 1-4, K ,  .212 (30-141) 2 extra-base hits since May 1

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_11_peoafx_cedafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 11, 2011, 03:02:44 pm
It was cool, but a lot better than the 17 degrees back here.  With snow.

I remember driving up to Santa Rosa and having to flip on the air for a bit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 11, 2011, 04:24:41 pm
Holiman has a 45% K rate and a .998 OPS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 11, 2011, 04:54:05 pm
He's got some really funny numbers. 

The funny thing is, you can afford a 45% K rate when you've got 5HR/24BB/33K's, the HR/walks more than justifies the K's. 

Heh, if you take the 38 AB when he didn't hit the ball into play, he's still hitting .131, and his OPS on non-walk-not-in-play AB's isn't too bad at .657. 

If only it seemed that his HR and walk rate was likely to be as sustainable as his K-rate against better pitching.....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2011, 05:35:13 pm
If only it seemed that his HR and walk rate was likely to be as sustainable as his K-rate against better pitching.....

Serious question.  Which do low level hitting prospects more often see improve as they advance thru the minors, their HR rate or their K rate?

It seems that a lot of hitting prospects see both their K rates and their HR rates improve as they progress, even as they are facing "better pitching."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2011, 05:37:08 pm
A site for tracking the race for the top draft pick:  http://www.obstructedview.net/view-user-profile.html?user=80

And I love the graphic there for the Cubs.   (http://www.obstructedview.net/components/com_comprofiler/plugin/templates/default/images/avatar/nophoto_n.png)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2011, 05:42:26 pm
It is hard to take Hoilman as a serious prospect.  But he does have some serious talents.  Prodigious power.  An OBA at .450.  These are not to be sneezed at.

However, he has struck out in 33 % of the times he has come to the plate, (his high walk rate makes the normal computation based upon at bats misleading), and it is hard to see that going up rather than down as he progresses on to leagues with better pitching.

But who knows?  Look at the progress made this year by Richard Jones, probably the closest thing to Hoilman as far as power is concerned in our system.  He struck out 33 % of the time with a 260 or so BA in his first year, and this year now has a BA over 300 while reducing his strike out rate to about 25 %.  And he doesn't have the extremely high walk rate that Hoilman has.

Even so, Jones probably gets less notice on this board than any other Cub prospect ever has with numbers like that.  And I suspect Hoilman will get (and deserve) little respect until he has put up respectable numbers at Daytona or higher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2011, 06:26:48 pm
Rhee: 7-4-2-2-2-7 , (CG)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_11_chaafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2011, 06:32:41 pm
What started out as a disaster of a season for Watkins is turning out to be almost acceptable.

I wonder how someone ends up with more triples than doubles?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2011, 06:33:35 pm
By hitting more triples than doubles, dumbass.

Trying to help Curt out.  He isn't as young as he used to be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 11, 2011, 06:37:19 pm
Serious question.  Which do low level hitting prospects more often see improve as they advance thru the minors, their HR rate or their K rate?

It seems that a lot of hitting prospects see both their K rates and their HR rates improve as they progress, even as they are facing "better pitching."

Definitely the HR rate.  Although many start out as not-fully-matured guys, rather than as a 22-year-old monster like HOilman.  And it's easier to improve on a low HR-rate than on Hoilman's current 34HR/500AB rate.  Hard to improve on a monster HR rate like that. 

My sense is that K-rate doesn't often reduce appreciably. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 11, 2011, 06:43:00 pm
Watkins has had a weird season.  he went 3-3 today, and is now up to .283, with an OBP in the .370's as a SS.  Not sure how good his SS defense is, but he's 21 in high A with a .370-something OBP, maybe he's got a chance to become a big-league player, utility or otherwise. 

Some freaky numbers, though.  Hit .198 in April and May, 148 AB. 

In June and July, he's .414, 99 AB. 

His BABIP in June/July is a robust .462. 

Hard to hit .283 with 56K/1HR in only 247 AB.  Those 56K/1HR ratios tend to be kind of stats-depressing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2011, 07:10:04 pm
But if he could reverse those numbers, it would be rather exhilarating.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 11, 2011, 08:50:29 pm
By hitting more triples than doubles, dumbass.

Trying to help Curt out.  He isn't as young as he used to be.
??????
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2011, 09:09:10 pm
It is hard to take Hoilman as a serious prospect.  But he does have some serious talents.  Prodigious power.  An OBA at .450.  These are not to be sneezed at.

However, he has struck out in 33 % of the times he has come to the plate, (his high walk rate makes the normal computation based upon at bats misleading), and it is hard to see that going up rather than down as he progresses on to leagues with better pitching.


(M)any start out as not-fully-matured guys, rather than as a 22-year-old monster like HOilman.  And it's easier to improve on a low HR-rate than on Hoilman's current 34HR/500AB rate.  Hard to improve on a monster HR rate like that. 

My sense is that K-rate doesn't often reduce appreciably.

And that may be a problem for him.  I had thought the guy might have been a high school pick.  Obviously not, and his K rate was about the same in college as now.  As a senior: .313 BA, .724 slugging, .440 OBP, 214 AB, 22 HR, 44 W, 72 K.  A K roughly a third of his ABs, and a HR about every 9 and a half trips to the plate.  http://www.etsubucs.com/uploads/statFiles/baseball/2011/teamcume.htm
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2011, 09:23:03 pm
If I understand right, he won the college home run derby this spring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2011, 09:55:23 pm
Smokies:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_11_cngaax_tenaax_1



Daytona GM 2:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_11_chaafa_dbcafa_2


Iowa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on July 11, 2011, 10:57:38 pm
Lots of movement going to be taking place tomorrow within the organization.....Brett Jackson and Ryan Flaherty are both called up to AAA Iowa and Ty Wright and Jae Hoon Ha will be joining TN.....The Smokies are off tomorrow and are coming off a much needed win off a nice effort from Dallas Beeler....More on the game tomorrow, headed to bed  now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2011, 11:09:39 pm
Strange that they are moving Wright back to Tenn.  He is hitting over 310 in Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2011, 12:48:34 am
Simpson: 2-4-3-3-3-2

Hernandez: 2-4, 3B, RBI

Geiger: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_11_cubrok_giarok_1


Hoilman: 0-3, BB, 3 K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_11_eveasx_boiasx_1


The DSL 2 team throws a combined no-hitter.

Candelario: 0-3, 2 BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_11_dchrok_dwarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on July 12, 2011, 06:35:38 am
Now that I got a little sleep after getting in late last night I will hit up my recap and notes from last nights Smokies game....I will start off again by congratulating Flaherty and Jackson on their promotions, Jackson didn't seem much different but you could certainly tell Flaherty was pumped up beyond belief and he was walking out with his stuff. Heck he didn't even give me any grief for the first time ever wearing my Tennessee Vols baseball shirt, he's always picked at me when I wore it since he went to Vandy. On to the good, Dallas Beeler threw a heck of a game last night. He pitched 6 innings giving up 8 hits, only walking 1 but only had 2 strikeouts....He also worked out of several jams and topped out at 91 and had a nice breaking ball working as well. Marcus Hatley picked up the win last night pitching 2 no hit innings with his only baserunner being on a HBP on his first pitch of the game. Hitting wise Vitters went 2-5 but once again hit a couple right on the money only to be right at someone and made a couple of outstanding defensive gems over at 3rd tonight which was a very welcome change from previous nights. Nelson Perez had another solid game going 2-2 with a 2 run HR and drawing 2 walks, he also had an outfield assist on a double play gunning out a straying baserunner at 1st from rf. On to the bad.......Rafael Dolis......Rafael has stuggled mightily the past couple of weeks especially last night, he topped out at 95 but gosh knows where it was going. He was brought in for the save during the 9th but never recorded an out. He gave up 2 hits, 2 runs and walked 3 drawing the game back to a one run game. He threw 20 pitches with only 8 of them going for strikes.....Not sure what is wrong with him but he needs to find some consistency.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 12, 2011, 09:29:48 am
Thanks for update. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 12, 2011, 10:13:49 am
Kyler Burke has had 2 decent outings in a row: over those 2 outings, 8 IP, 3H, 1 ER, 1 BB, 2 K. 

Arizona SS Marco Hernandez has been really good so far (albeit in only 17 games): .391/.496/.507/.943.  Listed at 6' 170 lbs, lefty bat. Born 9/92.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 12, 2011, 12:03:03 pm
It's nice to have a prospect that gets out to a good start in pro ball.

If Easterling can hold his batting average where it is as he moves through the system, while adding 30 - 40 HRs per year, he could have a decent ML career, even if he doesn't improve his walk rate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on July 12, 2011, 02:46:32 pm
If Easterling is only going to hit 30-40 HRs per year I think he needs to improve his batting average from where it currently stands if he is to have a successful career.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 12, 2011, 02:52:21 pm
Can't we just go ahead and give him 30-40 pretend home runs right now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 12, 2011, 02:52:22 pm
How about if he pitches on his days off?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on July 12, 2011, 03:11:03 pm
Depends on his pitching stats.  If he is ONLY going to have 40 or so saves per year, 20 wins and an ERA below 1.50 would be acceptable
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 12, 2011, 03:13:28 pm
Can't we just go ahead and give him 30-40 pretend home runs right now?

Scotti could.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 12, 2011, 03:57:56 pm
The worst thing about the All Star Game, possibly the most boring sporting event of the year, is that they even shut down minor league games, just in case someone wants to listen to something of more significance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on July 12, 2011, 04:18:28 pm
All the all star games are bad but at least the other 3 major sports don't pretend the game is bigger than what it is
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2011, 10:02:13 pm
Penalver: 1-3, HR, RBI, BB, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_12_dphrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 12, 2011, 10:23:32 pm
Jae-Hoon Ha's Tools Impressing Cubs

 By Phil Rogers
 June 27, 2011
 (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/email.gif)E-mail (?subject=Baseball%20America:%20Jae-Hoon%20Ha%27s%20Tools%20Impressing%20Cubs&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseballamerica.com%2Fonline%2Fmajors%2Forganization-reports%2Fchicago-cubs%2F2011%2F2612000.html) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/print.gif)Print
 
 CHICAGO—The Cubs never had any doubt about the boldness of Jae-Hoon Ha. As a highly regarded catcher, he turned down a chance to be a star in his native Korea to chase success in North America, signing with the Cubs in 2008 as he was finishing high school.
 
 "It takes some guts to leave your country," Cubs scouting director Oneri Fleita said. "For him to do what he's done, walk away (from family and friends), that takes some guts."
 
 Moving from catcher to the outfield, as Ha did after his first trip to instructional league, counted as a minor adjustment. He's far more accurate with his throws from the outfield than he had been on ones from behind the plate, which is one of the reasons why he's become one of the most upwardly mobile players in the organization.
 
 The biggest is that, in the words of Fleita, is that "all he's done is hit."
 
 Blessed with the bat speed to handle good fastballs, the 20-year-old Ha was hitting .296/.332/.473 with eight homers and 41 RBIs in 260 at-bats between high Class A Daytona and Double-A Tennessee, where he played for two weeks in late May while 2009 first-round pick Brett Jackson was sidelined. He hit .317/.334/.468 with seven homers at low Class A Peoria a year ago.
 
 Inexperience is the only weakness in his arsenal.
 
 "There are times now he's going to run until he's out, times he's going to swing at the rosin bag," Fleita said. "We'd like to see a little more (plate) discipline. But you can teach a guy to hone in."
 
 You can't teach a guy to make laser throws from the outfield. Ha, who moves between center field and right, piles up outfield assists: eight in the first two months of this season against only two errors.
 
 Fleita said the 6-foot-1, 185-pound Ha is considered a 70 runner on the 20-80 scale, but he has not yet become a skilled basestealer. He was caught 10 times in his first 16 tries this season.
 
 His English, however, has progressed nicely, and Fleita said teammates enjoy his outgoing nature.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 12, 2011, 10:24:02 pm
Cubs Midseason Report

 By Phil Rogers
 July 12, 2011
 (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/email.gif)E-mail (?subject=Baseball%20America:%20Cubs%20Midseason%20Report&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseballamerica.com%2Fonline%2Fmajors%2Forganization-reports%2Fchicago-cubs%2F2011%2F2612056.html) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/print.gif)Print
 
 Best Player: Former Villanova football star Matt Szczur has done nothing to make the Cubs regret giving him a $1.5 million bonus to forego the NFL draft, where he had been highly anticipated as a return man and Reggie Bush-style offensive force. Szczur, 22, is delivering in his first full season as a baseball player. He was hitting .318/.372/.441 with five home runs and 17 stolen bases at low Class A Peoria.
 
 Given that he was signed with an eye on filling the void for a homegrown leadoff man, his most impressive stat might be 54 runs in 63 games. He's a strong defensive center fielder, turning in errorless work in the first half of the season, and has enough arm to make right field a long-term possibility. His intangibles are off the chart, not that the Cubs aren't happy with the totals that can be measured.
 
 Biggest Leap Forward: An undersized prospect from Cincinnati, center fielder Tony Campana hit and ran his way to the top rung of the Cubs system, then got an unexpected opportunity to play center field when Marlon Byrd was injured. He was immediately ranked as one of the fastest runners in the majors and held his own at the plate, batting .274/.312/.301 in 73 at-bats. He had started the season hitting .342 in 30 games with Triple-A Iowa. His bat will determine if he's ever more than an extra outfielder and pinch-runner. The one downside to his big league stay was that he didn't use his small strike zone to work walks, with just four in 38 games.
 
 Biggest Disappointment: After a strong spring training in which general manager Jim Hendry mentioned righthanders Alberto Cabrera and Trey McNutt as guys who could help in the big leagues this season, the 22-year-old Cabrera lost both velocity and sharpness on his breaking pitches. Cabrera got hammered first with Double-A Tennessee and then with Triple-A Iowa. He had a 6.50 ERA through 89 innings, and at Iowa was allowing more than two baserunners per inning.

  Cubbyhole

 • Lefthanded-hitting Steve Clevenger has joined Welington Castillo in giving the Cubs two catchers under consideration for a big league promotion. Clevenger had combined to hit .332 with seven homers in 62 games between Double-A and Triple-A.   • D.J. LeMahieu, a second-round pick in 2009 from LSU, was hitting .358/.386/.492 at Double-A when he was summoned to Chicago as a fill-in for the sidelined Darwin Barney. The Cubs aren't sure if he projects more as a second baseman or third baseman but manager Mike Quade sees him as "somebody you can count on."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 12, 2011, 10:33:10 pm
Lefthanded-hitting Steve Clevenger has joined Welington Castillo in giving the Cubs two catchers under consideration for a big league promotion.

Bullshit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 12, 2011, 10:49:20 pm
I would love to see Clevenger replace Hill right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2011, 10:57:31 pm
Interesting that Szczur gets mentioned as a possible rightfielder. I've been wondering how that Jackson-Szczur thing was going to play out. I know offense is way down, but he'll still have to show more power than he has to play that position.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 12, 2011, 11:00:23 pm
If Tony Campana is the prospect who has taken the biggest step forward this year, that probably says all that needs to be said on what kind of year it's been on the farm.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 12, 2011, 11:54:49 pm
• Lefthanded-hitting Steve Clevenger has joined Welington Castillo in giving the Cubs two catchers under consideration for a big league promotion.

I call shenanigans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 13, 2011, 07:33:03 pm
The AAA All-Star Game will be on MLB Network tonight at 9pm EDT.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 13, 2011, 07:43:12 pm
Oh, cool.  Another all star game!  Who won last night's?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 13, 2011, 07:45:24 pm
I don't know but I don't think anyone turned down an invitation to tonight's.

ETA: Unless they're in the Majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 13, 2011, 08:42:03 pm
Another less than steller outing for Guzman in Daytona.  1.2 innings, 4 hits, 2 runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 13, 2011, 08:43:41 pm
Another excellent outing by Del Valle.  4 innings, 3 hits, no runs, no walks, 5 strike outs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on July 13, 2011, 08:45:08 pm
Former Cub Russ Canzler blasted a 3 run HR for the International team in the All Star game already....Another one they give up on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2011, 08:55:23 pm
Szczur: 1-3, BB

Antigua: 4-2/3 -6-2-0-1-6 , ( 33 K's / 8 BB in 29-1/3 IP at Daytona )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_13_dbcafa_ftmafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2011, 10:28:54 pm


Tenn:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_13_tenaax_msbaax_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_13_lcoafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2011, 11:40:44 pm
DSL team 2 completely dominated by Batman:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_13_dchrok_dmlrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 13, 2011, 11:46:06 pm
Typical game for Hoilman.  Two walks.  Two strikeouts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2011, 12:16:27 am
Wells: 5-6-2-2-1-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_13_boiasx_vanasx_1


Amaya/Hernandez/Geiger: 1-14, 8 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_13_rngrok_cubrok_1


Morel: 4-1/3 -0-0-0-3-6 , ( 26 IP, 14 H, 28 K )  17 yrs old

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_13_dwsrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2011, 03:38:08 am
Piece on Evan Crawford:

http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2011/07/14/daytona-cubs-bat-speed-catching-up-to-his-legs.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2011, 03:43:53 am
Luis Lira promoted to Peoria.

*

Del Valle, a 21-year-old Cuban defector making his second Chiefs start, pitched four scoreless innings. His fastball speed was clocked as high as 92 mph.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 14, 2011, 04:52:22 pm
ArizonaPhil


DeVoss was the DH in his first professional game, hitting 7th in the order. He struck out (swinging) in his 1st and 3rd ABs, grounded out to short in his 2nd AB, and flied out to the warning track in RF in his 4th AB, before crushing his game-winning walk-off double off the RF fence in the 10th. DeVoss displayed more power and loft in his swing (at least hitting LH) than I had thought he would show.


Meanwhile, Cubs 2011 27th round draft pick Taiwan Easterling (Florida State) lined a single with two outs in the bottom of the 9th to extend his hitting streak to six games (he is now hitting 500/517/714 through his first seven pro games covering 29 PA). The 22-year old FSU Seminole also made a slick diving catch in CF for the first out in the top of the 3rd, and threw out a runner trying to advance from 2nd base to 3rd base on a pick-off attempt overthrow to end the top of the 3rd.


Easterling is clearly more advanced than might have been expected, considering he did not play baseball his first two years at Florida State. But he was named "Mr. Baseball" in Mississippi in his senior year at Oak Grove HS and played on several post-season HS All-Star teams and in showcase games, and was selected by the Florida Marlins in the 6th round of the 2007 June Draft, before deciding to enroll at FSU. So it's not like he's just now learning how to play baseball.


Easterling received a reported $200K signing bonus (about equivalent to "4th round money"), which can be spread over five years since he is a two-sport player (he is also a WR on the Seminole football team). It is unclear at this time whether Easteling will return for his senior season at FSU to play football (and if he does, he would be a 5th year redshirt senior).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 14, 2011, 09:18:07 pm
DeVoss played OF in college.  But he's playing 2B in his non-DH debut tonight. 

That's fun.  We've got a fair number of defensive CFers.  So if he can be an OBP guy, it might be fun if he worked out at 2B instead of just OF. 

Easterling and Geiger not playing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 14, 2011, 09:44:04 pm
DeVoss with a single in his first at bat, and then a stolen base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2011, 09:51:39 pm
Szczur: 0-6, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_14_dbcafa_ftmafa_1

Jackson: 1-5, 2B, 2 K

Struck: 4-2/3 IP, 7 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_14_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2011, 10:00:49 pm
Kirk: 4-10-6-6-1-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_14_lcoafx_peoafx_1


Dolis: 1-4-3-3-0-0 , ( 27 Runs Allowed, 1.17 WHIP as reliever) --Another good Cubs decision--

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_14_tenaax_msbaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 14, 2011, 10:11:50 pm
Luis Flores with two more homers tonight. 

He might be a fluke, but it's amazing a catcher hitting the way he has isn't playing everyday . . . especially in Double-A.  I'm not sure why Oneri isn't demanding the Smokies manager to find a regular spot in the lineup for him somehow.  Make him the regular 1B or DH on days Clevenger is catching or something.  We really ought to find out what we have in this guy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2011, 10:46:56 pm
Candelario: 1-2, 2 BB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_14_dblrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2011, 11:52:46 pm
Zapata: 2-4, HR, RBI, BB, SB

Hernandez: 1-4, 2B, RBI, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_14_cubrok_pdrrok_1

Golden: 0-3, BB, 2 K , ( 4 for last 23 ; 0 EBH's last 32 AB's )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_14_boiasx_vanasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 15, 2011, 07:37:26 am
Zapata: 2-4, HR, RBI, BB, SB

Hernandez: 1-4, 2B, RBI, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_14_cubrok_pdrrok_1

Golden: 0-3, BB, 2 K , ( 4 for last 23 ; 0 EBH's last 32 AB's )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_14_boiasx_vanasx_1

The good thing about Golden is, in his last 10 games, he still has only 7 strikeouts in 36 at bats.  In his 4 for 23 spell, he has 6.  For a guy I had assumed would be a K king and was drafted based on tools and not skills, I have no problem with that during a cold spell.  It remains to be seen whether he can keep it up, but a guy has to first do something before he can keep it up.

Guys like him the Cubs draft always have K problems.  It just seems odd that one might not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 15, 2011, 11:47:29 am
I'm not sure why Oneri isn't demanding the Smokies manager to find a regular spot in the lineup for him somehow.

I'm not sure why Oneri still has his job.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 15, 2011, 12:23:04 pm
I'm not sure why Oneri's mother named him Oneri.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 15, 2011, 12:26:38 pm
Because she didn't know how to spell dumba$$.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 15, 2011, 12:29:46 pm
Is that with one $, or two?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 15, 2011, 12:43:43 pm
Two.  And an exclamation point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 15, 2011, 01:20:22 pm
I don't know what an exclamation point is!!!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 15, 2011, 02:06:20 pm
The season has been saved!

The Cubs have signed Dave Bush to a minor-league deal.  He'll report to Iowa over the weekend.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 15, 2011, 02:12:56 pm
Bush is 2-10 lifetime against the Cubs. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 15, 2011, 02:19:58 pm
Bush is a weapon of mass destruction.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 15, 2011, 02:22:44 pm
The Cubs have signed Dave Bush to a minor-league deal.  He'll report to Iowa over the weekend.

How many more retreads can we sign this year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 15, 2011, 02:24:29 pm
7
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 15, 2011, 02:42:19 pm
Has it occurred to anyone that with all the teams needing catchers this year, nobody has asked about Hill?

And if they asked about Hill, and we didn't trade him for whatever was offered, it's another reason to fire Hendry?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 15, 2011, 03:04:40 pm
If they didn't ask about Hill, it is because he stinks.

If they did ask, and we didn't trade for what was offered, wouldn't that indicate that the offer was players that stink as bad or worse than Hill?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 15, 2011, 03:12:07 pm
There ARE no players that stink as bad or worse.  And even if some existed, clear the way for our kids to come up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 15, 2011, 03:58:07 pm
I agree that we should clear the way for a kid to come up.  But if all they are offering (and neither of us have the slightest idea of who or what may have been offered), are equally worthless vets, we should probably just release Hill, rather than release the guy we get for him.

By the way, I would rather have Clevenger brought up, than Castillo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2011, 06:42:17 pm
Hoilman: 1-5, HR, 2 RBI, 3 K

Golden: 1-5, 2 K

Kim: 1-2/3 -4-5-5-1-2, HR, WP , (Easily been the most disappointing of the Low-A prospects)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_15_boiasx_vanasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2011, 09:06:00 pm
Szczur: 2-5, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_15_dbcafa_ftmafa_1

Candelario: 0-2, RBI, 3 BB, K

Penalver: 2-5, 2B, RBI, SB, 2 K

Perez: 6-4-2-2-0-10 , ( Just turned 18 )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_15_dchrok_dyarok_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2011, 09:49:49 pm
Jackson: 2-5, 2B, 3B, SB, 2 K

Flaherty: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, 2 K

Jackson: 7-6-1-1-2-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_15_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2011, 11:16:30 pm
Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_15_lcoafx_peoafx_1


Sanchez: 0-3, 2 BB, 2 K, CS, E , ( 17 E's in 36 GM's )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_15_dparok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2011, 11:30:29 pm
Ha: 3-5, 2B, RBI, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_15_tenaax_msbaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 16, 2011, 09:01:47 am
Quote
A Cubs minor league pitcher, Yomar Morel, has tested positive for steroids and has been banned for 50 games. Morel is a 17 year old who was putting up great numbers in the Dominican Summer League, so it’s sad for two reasons. Morel is the fifth DSL Cub to be suspended for PEDs. I know that the PED culture in the Dominican Republic is different than it is here in the States (in the last five years, anyway), but that seems like an issue.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 16, 2011, 09:37:05 am
"seems"?

That's about like the Cubs'  100+ year streak "seems" to be an issue.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 16, 2011, 12:43:35 pm
The problem doesn't seem to be restricted to the Cubs.  I have heard that a good many are already on steroids before they sign.  I wonder if there is a law in the DR that prevents testing before signing a player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 16, 2011, 01:43:38 pm
The Peoria Chiefs have put Pierre LePage on the DL with back tightness.  Taking his place is Taiwan Easterling, the 2011 27th round pick from FSU.  He had been at Mesa.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 16, 2011, 01:44:06 pm
Peoria puts Pierre LePage on the DL (back tightness) and OF Taiwan Easterling, the 27th round pick from FSU, moves up from Mesa to take his place.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 16, 2011, 02:16:10 pm
Peoria puts Pierre LePage on the DL (back tightness) and OF Taiwan Easterling, the 27th round pick from FSU, moves up from Mesa to take his place.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 16, 2011, 02:16:46 pm
I had to post that because Cactus is such a lazy bum he never does.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 16, 2011, 02:19:01 pm
My mother repeats herself like that, but she is almost as old as Curt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 16, 2011, 02:23:38 pm
repeat what?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 16, 2011, 02:35:06 pm
Could someone please tell me where Taiwan Easterling is playing these days?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 16, 2011, 02:40:51 pm
Somebody said Peoria, but who knows.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 16, 2011, 06:24:49 pm
Austin Bibens-Dirkx goes from Iowa to Tennessee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 16, 2011, 06:35:14 pm
There has been more movement in the farm system this year than I remember in the past.  Some of it is probably because so many pitchers were called up, but that doesn't seem to explain all of it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2011, 07:32:21 pm
Penalver: 2-5, 2B, SB

Candelario: 2-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_16_dchrok_dgirok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 16, 2011, 07:34:37 pm
There has been more movement in the farm system this year than I remember in the past.  Some of it is probably because so many pitchers were called up, but that doesn't seem to explain all of it.

Desperation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2011, 08:16:39 pm
Bour: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_16_dbcafa_ftmafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on July 16, 2011, 08:48:10 pm
Whenever I see the name Austin Bibens-Dirkx, I think of Meredith Baxter Birney.  I hope that he is better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 16, 2011, 08:51:11 pm
Keith Law has Hak Lee as the #7 prospect in all of baseball in his mid-year list (http://www.faketeams.com/2011/7/15/2277118/keith-laws-updated-top-50-prospect-list).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 16, 2011, 09:26:32 pm
Easterling celebrates his promotion with his first professional home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 16, 2011, 10:01:36 pm
Easterling celebrates his promotion with his first professional home run.

He might not need 30 imaginary home runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2011, 10:06:49 pm
Jackson: 2-3, 2B, RBI, 2 BB, K

Flaherty: 2-3, 2B, SF, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_16_orhaaa_iowaaa_1


Smokies:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_16_tenaax_msbaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2011, 10:36:57 pm
Easterling: 2-6, HR, 2 RBI, BB, 3 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_16_ftwafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2011, 12:19:36 am
Hawks' game ends after a storm:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_16_boiasx_vanasx_1

Amaya: 2-4, 2 K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_16_cubrok_athrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2011, 08:31:52 am
The signing of DeVoss may be prompting a positional domino.  Amaya is hitting .377 and was playing 2B (4 errors there), Geiger hitting .366 with power at 3B (3 errors).  With DeVoss at 2B, that pushed Amaya off to 3B; and Amaya at 3B pushed Geiger over to 1B. 

We'll see, that was one game.  But IIRC neither Geiger nor Amaya played on Thursday and Friday was an off day.  So I'm kind of thinking it might be for serious, and that they were given a couple of days to practice the new positions before starting over at them? 

Lesser prospects should and do move for the better, so they presume $0.5K DeVoss is the better and the others move accordingly.  I also think that often managers like to win, and don't always have big-league careers foremost in mind.  And it's iffy whether Geiger was going to make it defensively at 3B, and I'm sure the same goes for Amaya at 2B.   

But to some degree it might be unfortunate, since Geiger's bat is much more likely to be an asset at 3B than at 1st.  And while Amaya might be a nice hitting 2B, he's unlikely to have the 3B power you'd like to see.  So somewhat unfortunate.  And if it's a reflection that both guys don't look promising at their original 2B and 3B positions, , that's disappointing too because it lowers their value as prospects if their defense is looking discouraging.  But, we'll see. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 17, 2011, 08:52:15 am
I'm sort of curious how Devoss does at 2B considering he was a CF in college.  Not exactly an easy switch.  If he can play error free ball, I would have to think that speaks something of his potential defensively there.

I think the saddest thing when looking at Iowa's stats is, of the guys who have pitched more than 1 game, there are 3 guys with an era under 4 and 2 guys with an whip under 1.35. I mean...just...wow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2011, 09:39:34 am
nsbb suggests that with DeVoss at 2b and Amaya going to 3rd, that Geiger is moving up to peoria and Rohan to Daytona. 

Maybe somebody mentioned, but with Easterling in CF last night, that Ruby Silva played 2B.  I know back when Silva was signed and was thought to perhaps be a prospect, it was mentioned that he'd played some 2B in Cuba but was mostly blocked there, but that it was blocking rather than necessarily aptitude which kept him off 2B. 

Not that it matters much where a bust plays.  Silva can't hit, walk, run, or power (.291 OBP as 22-year-old in low A, 58K/11BB, 3SB/4CS).  So his offense seems like the kind of thing that would be bad for a non-drafted free agent.  So whether he auto-outs at 2B or in CF, who cares.  But as a bonus baby, still somewhat interesting. 


It's probably hopelessly unrealistic, but I think he still might have a long-shot chance to perhaps blossom into a Jose Macias.  That's probably unrealistically optimistic, but I'd think that could be Silva's best case.  Macias player for 7 years as a 5-position 2B/3B/OF guy, with a .298 OBP, a pretty consistent .665 OPS, and his only years over .700 being a .707 and a .723 OPS.  So Silva might aspire to something like that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 17, 2011, 10:57:15 am
Cruel.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on July 17, 2011, 11:01:34 am
You've been on that one from the beginning, Deeg.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 17, 2011, 11:03:00 am
It breaks my heart, East.  Hendry should be fired for that trade - even if he already hadn't done enough to be fired.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on July 17, 2011, 11:05:53 am
If he becomes a star, it will be excruciating to watch unless Garza takes a big step forward and the Cubs get good soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 17, 2011, 11:59:13 am
But where would we be without Garza?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 17, 2011, 11:59:46 am
Clearly you two do not understand the dynamics of baseball or buffet surfing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 17, 2011, 01:05:52 pm
Garza has taken a big step forward.  He has pitched like an ace.  At Fangraphs, FIP and xFIP say Garza's ERA should be 2.92 and 2.96, respectively.  He has just had ridiculously bad luck/terrible support from his defense, bullpen, and offense. 

2011's Matt Garza is a building block player.  Other than Starlin Castro, Garza is the most important player at any level of the organization, and it's not even close.  It will suck if Lee becomes a star.  But right now, Lee is far enough away from the majors and Garza is good enough that it's not even clear the Cubs lost this trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 17, 2011, 01:21:05 pm
I hope you are right about Garza, br.


I do agree that Lee is not yet a sure thing (no prospect is), but I'm pretty nervous about the ultimate outcome of that trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 01:34:41 pm
I was very disappointed at the time the trade was made, just as I was extremely disappointed when the Cubs traded Joe Carter for Rick Sutcliffe.

Sutcliffe was everything that the Cubs wanted him to be and more, but I still would rather have had Carter than Sutcliffe for the rest of their careers.

You almost always have to give up something in order to get something, and the farther off into the future the payoff is, the more you have to pay for near term help.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 17, 2011, 01:38:35 pm
And that is why teams tend to overpay for immediate help, and why teams which are going nowhere (such as the Cubs) should trade players with current value in order to get back players with future value.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 01:40:35 pm
True, if you don't have to sell tickets next year in order to pay debts that keep you from losing your team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2011, 01:41:25 pm
And with Soriano, Alf, Fuku, Grabow, Pena all available in trade, teams are most certainly lining up guys with Joe Carter and Lee type talent in hopes of acquiring them. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 17, 2011, 01:44:08 pm
Garza has taken a big step forward.  He has pitched like an ace.  At Fangraphs, FIP and xFIP say Garza's ERA should be 2.92 and 2.96, respectively.  He has just had ridiculously bad luck/terrible support from his defense, bullpen, and offense.

So you believe the Cubs could trade him and get in return for him what you should expect for an ace in his prime and likely to be pitching at ace levels for the next three years?

I don't, and even if I did, the first two of those next three years are sure to be loser seasons for the Cubs.  Move him to a team which can benefit from those "ace seasons" (which to me are about as real as the hypothetical HR's Scotti gave to Colvin's minor league stats) and which will give the Cubs back a couple of top prospects who will be hitting their prime when the Cubs might actually have a chance of winning.

Then everyone will be happy.

Except for the team that gets Garza when they realize that "Fangraphs" does a poor job of identifying true ace pitchers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 02:04:10 pm
Nope.  I was talking about the complaints about the Garza trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 17, 2011, 02:45:43 pm
Sorry, Dave, but comparing a trade that involved a team in the thick of a pennant race: Sutcliffe and Carter: to the trade for Garza, on a team that Koufax, Mays, and Ruth in their prime probably couldn't have helped, makes the ridiculist.

We traded the future for making the present stink a little less.  Brilliant.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 17, 2011, 03:03:08 pm
The Garza trade would have made more sense if what the Cubs received amounted to more than simply Matt Garza.

The Cubs traded a fifth outfielder (Sam Fuld), a fringe catching prospect (Robinson Chirinos), a decent outfield prospect (Brandon Guyer),  the Cubs top pitching prospect at the time (Chris Archer) and probably their best middle infield prospect (Hak-Ju Lee).

Jim Hendry just surrendered too much for one pitcher that isn't a difference maker.

They've already released the bum of an outfielder they got back and they have a 23 year-old at A+ wasting everybody's time.

Hendry overestimated the impact that Garza would have and overestimated the depth of his roster and overestimated the depth of his farm system.

If the Cubs got back better pieces in addition to Garza, I don't think people would have as much trouble with the move but the Cubs whiffed on every player in the trade and it's frustrating to see Lee with an OPS over 1.000 while the Cubs are a billion games out of first place, which is exactly where they would be with or without Matt Garza.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 17, 2011, 03:09:06 pm
{i]a team that Koufax, Mays, and Ruth in their prime probably couldn't have helped, makes the ridiculist.[/i]

Now, that is an exaggeration.  If all three of those, in their primes, were added to the current Cub team, it would help.

Probably get us all the way to being-competitive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 17, 2011, 03:23:03 pm
If you could trade all of them, plus ARam, Z and Dempster for another Darwin Barney and not pay a cent of their salries, you'd save several megabucks. Cut ticket prices, retool the front office and coaching staff, and spend a good part of the money on player procurement and development, and you're well on the way to a successful rebuilding program.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 03:47:20 pm
Garza is just entering the prime of his career, and barring injury, should be there for quite a few years to come.  I didn't like the trade, (and still don't) but I can understand it.  If you assume that the Cubs can not compete in the next 5 years or so, then no trade will either hurt or help.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2011, 04:09:14 pm
Jackson: 0-3, BB, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_17_orhaaa_iowaaa_1


Lopez: 1-6-5-5-0-1

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_17_ftwafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 17, 2011, 04:30:45 pm
Garza is just entering the prime of his career, and barring injury, should be there for quite a few years to come.  I didn't like the trade, (and still don't) but I can understand it.  If you assume that the Cubs can not compete in the next 5 years or so, then no trade will either hurt or help.

You assume a longer shelf life for Garza than I do.

True dominant aces may have a 5-6 year shelf life.  Most do not, and I don't see Garza as being an ace to begin with.

He's a nice pitcher, and a team could easily win a championship if they had five guys like him in the rotation.  But he is not what I would consider an ace, let alone a truly dominant one.  I suspect he will be about as good as he is now for about three years, and they start to show some serious decline related to age and wear.  And since I see the Cubs as having no chance for the next two years, and very little in the third, I see keeping Garza about like trying to save an ice cream cone for desert outdoors during a barbeque when the temperature is 95% and you have no refrigeration.  He simply is not going to be around when you want him, and he is offering us little of value now.  It was a foolish trade.  And I said so then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 05:06:12 pm
I see no reason that Garza's expected career should be any shorter than that of Lee or Halliday, who are 5 or 6 years older than Garza and still producing reasonably well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 05:10:59 pm
Ceasar stole home in the first inning today.  It was not part of a double steal, which is quite unusual.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 17, 2011, 05:22:12 pm
once you cross the Rubicon...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 17, 2011, 05:30:22 pm
I see no reason that Garza's expected career should be any shorter than that of Lee or Halliday, who are 5 or 6 years older than Garza and still producing reasonably well.

I do.

Lee and Halliday are true dominant aces.

I don't think anyone would seriously equate Garza with either of them.... unless they relied primarily on Fangraphs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2011, 05:33:35 pm
No offense, but if this convo continues, I hope it does so in the Cubs '11 topic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2011, 05:35:31 pm
Cruz: 5-2/3 -4-1-1-0-8

Golden: 0-2, BB , ( 6-32, no EBH's last 10 GMs )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_17_boiasx_vanasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 06:37:55 pm
Guzman with another 2 innings today.

I think he has been the starting pitcher in every appearance this year.  I wonder if there is a reason why they don't bring him in in later innings, where a normal reliever usually enters the game.  I can't believe that they envision him as a starter in the future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2011, 06:58:03 pm
I don't think Guzman is close to a ML return. Thus, they are probably more concerned with getting him innings in relatively pressure-free situations, and there's no better way to do that that in inning #1.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2011, 07:00:40 pm
Logan Watkins continues his blazing BABIP stretch, he's up to .294, OBP at .380 or better now, stole a couple bases today, and he's keeping his BABIP up around .500 for the last couple of months.  He's even reduced his K-rate some this month, 7 K's in 57 AB, which is pretty hot for a guy who's K-rate is over 22% on the season.   I tell myself it's just a lucky BABIP thing, because guys who miss so much that they K 20% of the time and have 60K/1HR ratios can't sustain a good batting average.  But I try to hope that he's 21 and he's still going to improve some.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2011, 07:01:18 pm
Cruz, really nice to see.

Dave, I think they routinely have the short, controlled-inning rehab guys start.  They did that with Hatley and other more obscure rehab guys as well. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2011, 07:09:04 pm
Something always bad whenever McNutt occasionally pitches a little bit.  He actually danced through two shutout innings with a couple of walks, but then rained out. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2011, 07:15:46 pm
Rhee: 5-7-2-1-1-5


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_17_dbcafa_braafa_1


Tenn suspended.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 17, 2011, 07:21:52 pm
Guzman with another 2 innings today.

I think he has been the starting pitcher in every appearance this year.  I wonder if there is a reason why they don't bring him in in later innings, where a normal reliever usually enters the game.  I can't believe that they envision him as a starter in the future.

If his appearance is scheduled for a given day, what difference does it make to have him start the game or come in in the later innings?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on July 17, 2011, 07:40:33 pm
Someone on Bruce Miles' blog asked Bruce to ask Oneri Fleita about the following the next time he sees him.  Here are the walk rates for each team in the Cubs organization:

Here's how the Cubs go by league:

Iowa: 16th of 16 (but they are #1 strikeouts!)
Tennessee: 10th out of 10 (they are 9th in strikeouts)
Daytona: 8th out of 12 (they are also 8th in strikeouts)
Peoria: 15th out of 16 (they are 16th in strikeouts)
Boise: A short season bright spot! - 2nd out of 8 in walks (5th in strikeouts)
AZL: 13th out of 13 in walks (11th in strikeouts)

Fascinating, if this is true!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on July 17, 2011, 07:41:10 pm
P.S.  The Cubs themselves are 30th out of 30.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 08:07:06 pm
If his appearance is scheduled for a given day, what difference does it make to have him start the game or come in in the later innings?

If it doesn't matter, why doesn't he start some and relieve some?  I never said it was wrong.  I just thought it was strange.  Craig indicated that it is rather standard procedure, but I had not noticed it in the past.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 17, 2011, 09:00:12 pm
Iowa is last in walks.... but only 3rd in strikeouts.
Right on Tennessee and Daytona.  Most likely the difference on Iowa was simply the result of the day the stats were looked at.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 17, 2011, 09:04:40 pm
"Walks are for chumps." - Oneri Fleita
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 17, 2011, 10:30:44 pm
Guzman with another 2 innings today.

I think he has been the starting pitcher in every appearance this year.  I wonder if there is a reason why they don't bring him in in later innings, where a normal reliever usually enters the game.  I can't believe that they envision him as a starter in the future.

My opinion is that they probably want him to go thru a specific warmup routine and the best way to be sure of that is to have him start.

They also can be certain that he comes in with no one on base and in zero-pressure, zero-leverage situations and know which hitters he is going to face.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 17, 2011, 10:38:37 pm
nsbb suggests that with DeVoss at 2b and Amaya going to 3rd, that Geiger is moving up to peoria and Rohan to Daytona. 

I can't imagine Geiger would be promoted to Peoria.  If they thought he was that advanced at this point, he would have already started out at Boise.

Also, remember that DeVoss probably won't be sticking with Mesa for much more than a week.  Almost all the high round round college guys at least play a week in Mesa before moving to Boise.  Once he gets that promotion, perhaps Geiger goes back to 3B.

I have to admit, though, it will be pretty disappointing if they're already ticketing Geiger for 1B this early in his career.  I imagine that isn't the case, though.  Wilken spoke pretty highly of Geiger as a potential third baseman coming into the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 11:04:29 pm
Simpson with 4 scoreless innings today.  That brings his ERA way down to 8.74
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 17, 2011, 11:09:03 pm
Simpson with 4 scoreless innings today.  That brings his ERA way down to 8.74

Time to sell high.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2011, 11:36:24 pm

Amaya: 1-3, SB, BB, E

Zapata: 1-3, RBI, BB, SB

Simpson: 4-3-0-0-1-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_17_cubrok_mrnrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2011, 11:36:55 pm
Quote
Peoria, IL- The Peoria Chiefs and Chicago Cubs have announced that All-Star third baseman Greg Rohan has been promoted to High-A Daytona while RHP Matt Loosen returns from Double-A Tennessee. The Chiefs also add third baseman Dustin Geiger from Mesa of the Arizona Rookie League to get to a full 25-man roster for the first time since June 26.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2011, 11:45:52 pm
I can't imagine Geiger would be promoted to Peoria.  If they thought he was that advanced at this point, he would have already started out at Boise.

It's hard to argue with logic like that.

Except that Geiger has been promoted to Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 17, 2011, 11:51:40 pm
It's hard to argue with logic like that.

Except that Geiger has been promoted to Peoria.

That doesn't prove anything except that JR lacks imagination.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2011, 03:02:57 am
That doesn't prove anything except that JR lacks imagination.

Lol, yeah apparently not. 

I guess count that up as another weird Oneri promotion.  Hopefully it works out.  It'd be pretty exciting to see a 19 year old player put up some strong numbers in Low-A.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2011, 07:30:28 am
JR, they may have started him in Mesa because they felt he would get better initial instruction or evaluation for something in particular there than in Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2011, 07:50:09 am
Geiger is 3B, Wilson Contreras is 3B, both are young, Contreras was paid considerably more to sign so may have been viewed as as good or better a prospect.  By AzPhil's accounts, in XST Contreras was typically batting 3rd and hitting rather well; Geiger was typically batting 7th-9th and not hitting well.  By Phil's accounts, it was during the last two weeks or so of XST that Geiger finally hit a couple of HR's and had some multi-hit games.  But I think Contreras may have kind of had a longer tenure in which he was viewed as the better prospect, so when short season started, I think it made sense to give Contreras the Boise nod and keep Geiger at Mesa where he could get AB. 

During the month since, obviously Geiger has outperformed Contreras, and has perhaps for the moment jumped past Contreras on the organizational ladder.  To have merely promoted him to Boise would have recreated a two guys for one spot deal, just as would have keeping him at Mesa.   

He's cooled off recently, so we'll see how he does at Peoria.  0-for-last-9 with 5 K's.  Seems a typical Fleita case where a guy gets hot, gets noticed, and gets promoted a couple weeks later when he's no longer hot and on the crest, and is perhaps now in the trough. Hopefully he'll adjust well and be equal to Peoria. 

In his small sample last summer Geiger was reasonably patient walk-oriented.  This summer Fleita's got him straightened out and he's more aggressive, with the more traditional 3 walks/75 AB that characterizes the prospects Fleita likes best. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2011, 08:15:04 am
I'm curious.

There are a number of people who believe Hendry does at least some things well, and even a few who believe he should be kept as GM.

There are a lot of people who believe Wilken is an excellent scouting director and should be kept, even if draft his picks have not yet started producing impact players at the major league level for the Cubs.

And there are several of us who believe that whether Quade is any good with his in game strategy or not, such decisions just don't make much difference, particularly not for a team like the Cubs now have, and that keeping him or firing him doesn't matter much.

Is there ANYONE, other than Hendry, who thinks Flieta does a good job?  Is there ANY reason to think he does a good job?  Is there ANYONE, other than Hendry, who does not believe he should be replaced, and that replacing him with any beer vendor would have a good chance for improvement?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2011, 10:23:07 am
It's such a difficult and competitive business.  I think Fleita has tons of good qualities, really a lot.  And I wouldn't be surprised if wouldn't give a really strong, impressive interview and I'd see so many of the good qualities that he'd be near the top of my list. 

But some shortcomings.  Not much room for ANY real Achiles-heal flaws in baseball management.  I've liked him, I respect him, I certainly have wanted him to succeed, and I appreciate a lot about him. 

But he's got to go. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2011, 11:43:54 am
Craig I wouldn't disagree with a word of that.

But whatever his good qualities are, he seems a poor fit for the position he holds.

I am not suggesting that he be taken out back and shot, but he certainly should be replaced.

Perhaps he could take the job of the beer vendor I would replace him with....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 12:04:29 pm
I think the major problem with the Cubs system now is the same one that has been the problem since the Tribune took them over.  (Phil Wrigley was so terrible, that initially the purchase by the Tribune cause the new ownership to look pretty good).

The problem I have been complaining about since I spent enough time watching the minor league system is their philosophy that hitters should be aggressive.  The philosophy has been so pervasive that prospects were taught to be aggressive even when the situation calls for patience and selectivity.  Since the days of Ernie Banks, the organization realized that the draw of "a day in the sunshine" at Wrigley Field, with the possibility of a few home runs by Sauer, Banks, Kingman, Dawson or Sosa will draw enough fans to make the Franchaise a paying proposition.  The typical Wrigley Field attendee does not come to see defense, speed, or to a certain degree, even victories.  They come to see sluggers.  Thus, the prospects learn, often by actions rather than words, that the way to make it is to HIT.  Hitters with power are not tinkered with, even as far as their obvious flaws are concerned, because they don't want to cut down on their "natural aggressiveness".

We even see it on this board, which consists of much more sophisticated people than the average bleacherite.  High OBA is a good thing, but high OBA due to lots of walks is an "empty" OBA, and not to be taken seriously.  Barney is criticized because he walks so seldom that his OBA is too low, but Fukudome, who walks enough to have a very high OBA, is considered to be a weak link on the team.

A couple of years ago, it appeared that the minor league system, at least, was starting to stess pitch selectivity and taking walks when the situation demands it.  As far as I know, Fleita was implementing the policy with reasonable effectiveness.  But this year, they have returned to their old habits, and just about every minor league team in the system is near the bottom in walks taken, as is the major league team.

Some on this board believe that pitch selectivity is a skill that can not be taught.  That may be true, although I personally do not agree, but one thing IS certain.  Even if a prospect that does not have the ability is unable to learn it, a prospect that DOES have the ability is quite easily able to ignore it.  In other words, it might not be possible to teach someone to be selective, it is certainly possible to teach some NOT to be selective, if he is given to believe that hitting anything within reach is the way to prove that you deserve promotion.

Is Fleita at fault?  Probably.  But the source of the problem come from the overall philosophy of the organization, and that flows right from the top. 

Under the Tribune, the goal of the organization was to make a reasonable profit in good years and in bad ones.  And they were extremely successful at it.  Relying not on the "atmosphere" to bring in the fans, but upon the success on the field, is a risky proposition.  It means high profits in good years, and perhaps losses in the bad ones (and there will be times when the team on the field is a bad one, even under the best of managements).

I believe that the Cubs, under Ricketts, is moving in the right direction by increasing their scouting staff and providing them with money to sign prospects both at home and abroad.  But in my opinion, unless they change their development and performance philosophy, they can not be a dominant organization for any length of time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 18, 2011, 02:14:57 pm
I guess I would be more persuaded by Dave's argument about plate discipline and player development, if Cubs were actually developing position players in the first place. 

Most of the guys with place discipline issues are players who Cubs either trade for or sign as free agents.   Those are the guy actually getting the ABs at the major league level, not so much farm-produced players who don't walk.

As to the present bunch, Soto has a career isolated discipline of near .100.  Not a problem there. I wish Castro was representative of the Cubs farm system development. He doesn't walk but he's an anomaly in this system---a multi-tool guy who can play, so doubtful he says much about the organizational philosophy.  Barney-doesn't walk.  Let's see how long he's a regular.

Cubs don't walk, that's true.  In the last nine seasons (2003-2011), Cubs have been 14, 15, or 16th in walks seven times out of nine.  The notable exception was 2008 when Cubs were #1 in walks---thanks to guys like Edmonds, DeRosa, a big walk total year from Theriot (a Cubs developed player) and Soto, among others.

Before that (1998-2002), Cubs were above average in walks four out of five years (#5 or #6 in NL), mainly thanks to Sammy and Grace and one other guy who had a good walk year.  Sometimes it only takes two or three guys to be okay in walks.  They pump up the team total.

So, it seems to me that Cubs problem in player development is......player development.  I'll worry about plate discipline development when we actually develop players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 02:45:48 pm
My point, Reb, was that they can not develop players that succeed in the majors because it takes plate discipline to succeed in the majors.

They are promoted through the system due to their "natural aggressiveness", and then fail when they reach the majors for the same reason.

 Pie, Patterson, and others are examples of this.  Because the Cubs dreamed of them smashing home runs into the bleachers, to the delight of adoring fans, they were promoted through the system far before they were ready, and in spite of flaws that were easy for ML pitchers to take advantage of.  Some succeeded in spite of the organizational philosophy (Grace, Sandberg and a few others), but most really professional hitters had to be brought in from the outside.

Since I live outside the Chicago viewing area, many of the games I watch on "extra innings" are those with the other team's broadcasters.  For years, I have been hearing the same comments from just about every team.  Don't throw strikes to Cub hitters.  They swing anyway.

I have talked to quite a few scouts from other organizations over the years, and received the same comments.  As a group, the Cubs are the worst hitters (as opposedd to sluggers) in either league.

Until the philosophy changes, the results are not going to change.  It is not the only thing, but it is a necessary thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 03:46:56 pm


Loosen: 5-4-0-0-0-7 , ( 20 IP, 3 BB, 22 K's in Peoria )

Geiger: 1-4, 2B

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_18_ftwafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 03:55:01 pm
Del Valle got killed in that game.  I believe that is his first really bad outing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2011, 03:58:39 pm
unless they change their development and performance philosophy, they can not be a dominant organization for any length of time.

This is the one point I disagree on.  It is possible to be a dominant organization for an extended period of time without plate discipline.  It is simply harder to do and less likely, but it can be done.  It is, however, enough harder and enough less likely that it is quite foolish to try.

My point, Reb, was that they can not develop players that succeed in the majors because it takes plate discipline to succeed in the majors.

Again, not impossible, but unlikely enough that it is foolish for a team not to press for plate discipline.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 18, 2011, 05:12:08 pm
Dave- The walk totals speak for themselves.  As we have both noted, Cubs do very poorly relative to the NL in walks most seasons.  We are on the same page there.

My point is that it's mostly the acquired players who are getting the non-walk ABs, not players coming up within the farm system.  Maybe that adds up to a "philosophy" but it's more on the major league level as a practical matter, as Cubs simply are not developing position players.

I don't entirely agree that it takes plate discipline to suceed in the majors.  Without good plate discipline, you will be likely be a lesser offensive player than you would otherwise be with plate discipline, but you can still be a force. 

Also, I do not define plate discipline as exactly the same as drawing walks.  From my perspective, Tony Gwynn was a guy with good plate discipline notwithstanding the low walks because he had the discipline to attack pitches that he could handle.  There are always some really good low-walk hitters around and I would not call all of them undisciplined.  After all, offense is mostly about hitting.

I don't think that Corey Patterson's career sunk to a utility OFer level because of plate discipline.  He sunk because he could never handle the pitch on the outside part of the plate, i.e., he had a big hole, and also because he lacked the ability to adjust to how pitchers worked him and to adjust to failure generally--a bit of a makeup issue.  Had he been able to adjust and fix the hole a bit, I think Patterson would have been a solid regular--but a regular somewhat diminished by his low walks.

Castro doesn't walk a whole lot more than Patterson (when you take out the intentional walks) but Castro doesn't seem to have a hole anywhere and he seems like he has much better personal makeup than Patterson.  Likely Castro will be an impact player but he would be better if he could add the walks on top of the rest of the package.  I don't expect to see that--his issue will be adding home run power and I do expect to see that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2011, 05:31:19 pm
How many walks would Soriano get if he could lay off the low and outside pitch.  It's like a bad joke, a repeated nightmare.  As soon as he gets two strikes, you know the next one will be in the dirt outside and he'll flail at it.  If he could control that, how many more hitable pitches would he get along with the walks?  Who knows.  Dunston was the same way.  Drove me nuts.  Soriano mashes enough mistakes to keep himself in the lineup.  Barely.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 05:36:33 pm
I think Soriano's problem is he swings at too many pitches regardless of where they're located. And he tends to swing through them. Same problem Patterson had.

Dunston had more of a short, line-drive swing and was able to make more contact despite his lack of patience.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 05:42:48 pm
Reb - walks, or the lack of them, are just a symptom.  The devil is in the phrase (natural aggressiveness).  Cub hitters in the minors are taught to swing at the first pitch they think they can reach, rather than to wait for a pitch they can handle.  The result is they often make outs on bad pitches rather than take a walk or swing at pitches that will result in more consistant contact.

Brenly talks about it all the time.  Early in the count you don't swing on the balls low and outside, even if you think you can reach them.  Wait until they throw one down the middle, or wait until you walk, or wait until you have no choice but to swing with two strikes.  Most hitters do poorly with perfectly placed fastballs and sliders.  Most hitters do well with mistakes down the middle.  The Cubs are not taught that it is better to take a low outside strike one than it is to swing at the pitch.  Cub hitters are taught to avoid two strike situations at all cost, and the costs are substantial.

The Cubs are not only near the bottom in walks.  They are usually near the bottom in pitches taken per at bat.  This results in low production, and just as bad, results in opposing pitchers pitching far into the game.  We often see the damage done when our starters only go 5 or 6 innings.  We never try to take advantage of it ourselves.

I'm not going to go any further in the discussion.  When it comes to opinion, each of us has to decide for ourselves.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 18, 2011, 05:49:52 pm
Cub hitters in the minors are taught to swing at the first pitch they think they can reach, rather than to wait for a pitch they can handle. 

At this point, I can readily believe that there are serious problems in the coaching of Cub minor leaguers, but I cannot imagine they are being taught to "swing at the first pitch they think they can reach."  I suspect you are exaggerating.  That goes way beyond being an aggressive hitter. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2011, 05:56:37 pm
I don't think that Corey Patterson's career sunk to a utility OFer level because of plate discipline.  He sunk because he could never handle the pitch on the outside part of the plate, i.e., he had a big hole....


Eh.....

It wasn't that he couldn't handle the pitch on the outside part of the plate, but that he seemed unable to tell when a pitch would be IN the strike zone on the outside part of the plate.... or two feet outside.

He swung at both of them, and because pitchers noticed that, they tended to throw them more often two feet outside and let Patterson wave at the ball as it went by.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2011, 06:00:51 pm
Chris, that's kind of like saying what a friend of mine told me about my golf game, "Curt, I see your problem.  You're standing too close to the ball after you hit it."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 06:24:04 pm
At this point, I can readily believe that there are serious problems in the coaching of Cub minor leaguers, but I cannot imagine they are being taught to "swing at the first pitch they think they can reach."  I suspect you are exaggerating.  That goes way beyond being an aggressive hitter. 

They are taught to be extremely aggressive.  That is how they end up interpreting it.  It is bad to strike out.  It is good to hit the ball.  The rest follows.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2011, 06:35:05 pm
reb, I think the fact that the cubs are basically bottom of the league in walks from the Cubs to AAA to AA to A+ to A- to Rookie league suggests something endemic here. 

Your point is true that the characteristically low walk-levels at the big-league level reflect what outside pickups do, not what farm-developed players do, because in 15 years Fleita/Hendry haven't been able to develop our own players. 

I suspect that the don't-walk valuation is shared throughout the Hendry/Fleita braintrust.  They don't value walks at any level, majors or minors.  They don't value, procure or develop walk-taking patience in the minors, and they don't value or procure walk-taking players at the major league level.

The fact is obvious:  they've failed at developing players over their 15 year run.  The why is necessarily a matter of speculation rather than proof. 

Dave's hypothesis seems quite reasonable:  they don't value or encourage walk-talking type of patience in the  minors, instead they prefer "aggressiveness".  That's perhaps a strong contributing factor to why the prospects they have loved the best have tended to fail (Corey, Kelton, Pie, Harvey, Dopirak...) 

I also completely agree with one of Dave's points:  while it's true that certain players don't have the natural tools to be able to both hit and walk, (you can't just "develop" eveerybody into having walk-taking patience while still being able to hit...), it's almost certainly true that certain players who do have the tools to profitably do so can have walk-taking type patience devalued and allowed to go undeveloped and/or under-utilized.   It's my hypothesis that players like Barney, Lemahieu, Castro, Ha, Vitters are the types of guys who could develop a much more walk-patient approach without killing their hitting.  And that if they did, it could help not only their OBP and situational hitting, but perhaps also help their slugging.  As Dave has articulated by being more selective for more mashable balls. 

One other thought:  if your development system is a failure, whether because of the failure to value walk-taking patience of for other reasons, when you fail to develop our own guys you have to go outside. And when you go outside, you either have to pay massive prices, or else you end up needing to accept imperfect players.  Given that Hendry and the chief advisors that he hires don't value walk-taking patience, it stands to reason that they will be more willing to pursue players short on walk-taking patience than is true for most GM's.  It's literally "moneyball" logical, if the presumption is that other GM's worry too much about walks, and undervalue players who walk little.  Being logical, of course, doesn't necessarily succeed if the premise from which logical conclusions follow is faulty. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 07:10:53 pm
I think these kids arrive in the organization with a tendency one way or another, and those are hard to change. For instance, if the Cubs are telling their hitters to swing at everything, people like Geovany Soto, Paul Hoilman and Jeimer Candelario aren't listening.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 07:14:02 pm
Another example:

It's assumed that Darwin Barney rarely walks because pitchers fear him so little they tend to throw him everything in the strike zone. But take 17-year-old Oliver Zapata in Mesa. He's smaller than Barney and has shown little power to this point yet has a 21% walk rate. Almost no-one else in Mesa walks, but Zapata does. Why?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2011, 07:19:29 pm
They like his tortilla chips?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 08:04:40 pm
but I cannot imagine they are being taught to "swing at the first pitch they think they can reach."

If you mean that they are not told that in those exact words, I feel certain you are right.  But if you have had any experience teaching or coaching, you know that how you act, and what activity you reward has as much, or usually more effect on the kids that words do.  When they see the hackers promoted, they learn that the way to succeed is to be a hacker.  If they see great defensive and fundamental players passed over, they learn that defense and fundamentals are not important, as long as you hit enough.

A common saying among the Cubs kids is "you can't walk to the majors".  That is certainly true, but it doesn't encourage good behavior.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 08:09:50 pm
Almost all the prospects in the Cubs org are hackers by definition. If you don't promote them, then almost no-one gets promoted.

And, really, how many teenagers are profoundly patient at the plate? The percentage of them is probably in the single digits.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 08:41:26 pm
It's hard to tell in the DL or in Mesa, but looking at the higher levels, based upon walks/strikeouts

Boise

Chen, Darvil, Golden, Hoilman and Lopez do not appear to be hackers.

Peoria

Ceasar, Rohan, Gibbs, Bureul, LePage and Cuneo do not appear to be hackers.

Daytona

Watkins, Bour and Cerda do not appear to be hackers.

Tennessee

Flaherty, Clevenger, Jackson and Lalli do not appear to be hackers.

Iowa

LeHair and Scales (who is no longer there) do not seem to be hackers.

Time will tell how the non-hackers will be promoted.  The two that have been fairly high in the organization for a while are Clevenger and LeHair, neither of whom seem to be considered to be top prospects.

It is interesting to me that the three position players that the Rays took from the Cubs were all players with a respectable amount of walks, compared to strikeouts.  It seems that they didn't particularly ask for hackers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2011, 08:57:08 pm
when you fail to develop our own guys you have to go outside. And when you go outside, you either have to pay massive prices, or else you end up needing to accept imperfect players.

You had me in complete agreement up to those two sentences.

I strongly disagree with you here.

It is by no means an either/or proposition.

The Cubs have proven time and again that you can both pay massive FA salaries and also accept an imperfect player in the process.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2011, 08:58:27 pm
Almost no-one else in Mesa walks, but Zapata does. Why?

Because Flieta hasn't had enough time with him yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 09:00:15 pm
Perhaps we need a definition for what constitutes a hacker. Bour, for instance, has just a 10% walk rate, and I'd guess some of those are intentional.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 09:04:49 pm
Szczur's walk rate is 7%. If he ain't a hacker, I don't know what he is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 09:11:40 pm
he also doesn't strike out a lot.  To me, a hacker is someone who swings and misses at a lot of bad pitches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 09:32:41 pm
We have different definitions then.

To me, a hacker is someone who rarely takes pitches or walks.


Hoilman looks to be about as patient as anyone in the sport yet K's at a preposterous rate. Soto can be frustratingly patient yet also K's a lot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on July 18, 2011, 09:34:39 pm
this Jones kid in Peoria is mashing it right now....is he any type of prospect? DH material?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 09:39:08 pm
jacey,

I wouldn't put much stock into what Jones is doing this season. He's 23-1/2 and repeating low-A ball. Perhaps he's improved, but I wouldn't get too excited until he does something in AA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 09:44:01 pm
Completed Tenn game:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_17_tenaax_msbaax_1


Bour: 2-4, HR, RBI, K

Antigua gets a start: 5-4-3-3-2-3, 2 HR

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_18_dbcafa_braafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 09:52:48 pm
Jones has substantial power, but up until now has has considerable trouble making enough contact to have a decent BA.  This is a nice year for him, but I wouldn't consider him a good prospect until I see him do it at Daytona or higher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2011, 09:54:22 pm
Quote
Sam Fuld on fangraphs wrote:
Isuppose it depends on who your manager is, and who your front office is. I came up in the Cubs system, and they’re probably not as involved in the statistics side of the game as some other organizations. It still is important to me to get on base, even though (laughs) there were some guys who, all they cared about was my average.

Keri: Were they telling you, “be aggressive, be aggressive, swing, swing, swing?”

Fuld: Yeah, I definitely got a lot of that sort of instruction. It’s frustrating, but it’s reality. You have to please your boss before anybody else. That’s one of the things I’m actually looking forward to in going to the Rays, is maybe a little more advanced thinking when it comes to the numbers of baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2011, 09:59:14 pm
Pretty ugly indictment of the system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 09:59:58 pm
Fuld's walk rate as a Cub: 16%

Fuld's walk rate as a Ray: 8%

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 10:02:18 pm
Chris, I understand your definition, but I don't think it is very useful in many respects.

To me, an hacker is someone that swings at bad pitches.  Soriano is a hacker, and I think he fits both your and my definitions.  But watching others on the team, I would not consider Barney a hacker, even though he strikes out much more than he walks.  On the other hand, I DO consider Castro a hacker because he very often swings at pitches well out of the zone.

Some hitters can be hackers and still be very successful.  Yogi Berra and Vladimir Guerrero come to mind.  But most can not, and young players should certainly not be ENCOURAGED by the system to be one unless there success is immediate and obvious.

It is much more difficult to assign that label to prospects that you have not seen.  For that reason, I use the ratio of walks to strikeouts as a proxy, saying "appears" because the stats do not lend themselves to a better analysis.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 10:30:12 pm
Dave, if one can only detect a hacker by sight, then you can't list players at all. It's just a blind guess at that point, even if you use the word "appears". And I certainly wouldn't call someone with a 30% walk rate a hacker regardless of whether I've seen him hit.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 10:30:40 pm
DeVoss has one walk and was hit by pitches twice so far.  And has stolen 4 bases.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 18, 2011, 10:32:03 pm
A hacker is a hitter who swings regularly at pitches outside of the strike zone, thereby K'ing, making poor contact, and failing to walk or get into advantageous counts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 10:32:31 pm
To me, a hacker is someone who swings and misses at a lot of bad pitches.

What if you swing through a lot of strikes? Patterson did that. Jose Canseco, Soto on the Cubs, etc. Most of your high K guys will swing and miss at pitches both in and out of the zone. They can still be patient hitters, however.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 10:43:32 pm
Smokies GM 2:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_18_tenaax_msbaax_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 10:43:44 pm
Someone forgot to tell Yomar Morel he's suspended: 5-5-4-3-2-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_18_drdrok_dcurok_1

Candelario left in the 3rd inning:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_18_dchrok_dmerok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 18, 2011, 10:45:24 pm
To me, a hacker is someone who swings and misses at a lot of bad pitches.

What if you swing through a lot of strikes? Patterson did that.

When major league pitchers realized that Patterson could not handle pitches in the zone away, it was Paterson's turn to adjust to that---and he never could.  If you watch him even now with the Jays, same story.  He is exploited in the zone a lot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 18, 2011, 10:48:21 pm
I'd call Patterson a poor hitter more than a hacker.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 10:50:45 pm
I'd call him both. Though he's not a horrendous hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 10:52:31 pm
Patterson also swung and missed a great many pitches outside the zone.  You can be a hacker and also have a hole in your swing.  I don't consider Soto a hacker.  He is one of the most patient hitters on the team, other than Fukudome.  That is why strike outs alone can not define a hacker.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 10:57:41 pm
I don't consider Soto to be a hacker either. In fact, I'd bet he's near the league lead in pitches seen per AB.

I don't believe strikeouts can tell you whether someone is a hacker at all. But then we have to use one definition for hacker.

Dunston swung at everything but his strikeouts were quite low after his first year or two. Some guys can put the bat on the ball even when swinging at garbage; some have trouble with pitches down the middle.

That's why I'm more apt to look at pitches taken (visual) and walks drawn (statistical).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2011, 10:58:41 pm
Jackson: 0-4, BB, 2 K , ( 20 AB's , 9 K's in Iowa )

Carpenter: 2-0-2-1-2-1 , 2 WP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_18_nasaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 18, 2011, 11:03:40 pm
they don't value or encourage walk-talking type of patience in the  minors, instead they prefer "aggressiveness".  That's perhaps a strong contributing factor to why the prospects they have loved the best have tended to fail (Corey, Kelton, Pie, Harvey, Dopirak...) 

Every single one of these guys played in other organizations after the Cubs----and flopped to one extent or the other.

If the argument is that they were traumatized forever by the Cubs farm system aggressiveness fever, that strikes me as a dubious proposition.  They flopped not because of anything the Cubs did to them in their development but because they could not hit.

As to Cubs farm teams not walking this season, it's one season.  Show me some data over a bunch of seasons and I'll be interested in that.

As to Fuld's comments, a traded player who perceives he didn't get a fair shake is not always the best source about things. Fuld is a smart guy but hard to know where he's coming from. In any case, I doubt that a minor league player is going to have much knowledge about how the organization is using statistics.  No clue how he would know that. one way or the other. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 11:20:02 pm
It is the opinion of more than one baseball person I have talked to that the failure of Patterson and Pie specifically WAS because of the way they were handled by the Cubs.  I don't dispute, however, that opinions are generally impossible to prove one way or the other.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2011, 11:21:36 pm
DeVoss with his fifth stolen base of the game.  It will be interesting to see if he continues to steal as he progresses through the system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 18, 2011, 11:21:58 pm
Patterson also swung and missed a great many pitches outside the zone.  You can be a hacker and also have a hole in your swing.  I don't consider Soto a hacker.  He is one of the most patient hitters on the team, other than Fukudome.  That is why strike outs alone can not define a hacker.

Soto swings and misses at a lot of pitches outside the zone.  Soto does that because he does not identify the breaking ball well and misses those pitches, sometimes by a comically large margin.  I think he misses pitches by a wider margin than anybody on the club other than Soriano.  But, not a hacker, I agree.

It's hard to define a hacker.  Generally, I think a hacker is a hitter who is not much interested in working the count.  See the ball--hit the ball.  On the other hand, I mentioned Gwynn before and I wouldn't really call him a hacker.  Perhaps the greatest two-strike hitter of the last 50 years, he was disciplined and aggressive at the same time.

Barney is a hitter who tries to work the count.  By that definition, he's not a hacker.  If you look at his walk rate, he looks like a hacker statistically.  Watch Barney with two strikes. He is protecting the plate like mad--very old school--but he swings at a ton of pitches outside the zone with two strikes, with some success too. But, he would draw more walks if he took some of those pitches. It's frustrating to watch at times.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2011, 12:18:17 am
Golden: 0-4, 3 K

Wells: 5 IP, 2 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_18_boiasx_spoasx_1


Zapata: 1-4, RBI, SB, BB

Amaya: 2-4, K, CS


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_18_dodrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2011, 12:21:57 am
On the other hand, I mentioned Gwynn before and I wouldn't really call him a hacker.

We talked about Gwynn before. He seemed to be one of the few guys in history who could put just about any pitch into play. Hard to blame a guy like that for rarely walking. I'd say he's an outlier.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 19, 2011, 12:41:23 am
Another example:

It's assumed that Darwin Barney rarely walks because pitchers fear him so little they tend to throw him everything in the strike zone. But take 17-year-old Oliver Zapata in Mesa. He's smaller than Barney and has shown little power to this point yet has a 21% walk rate. Almost no-one else in Mesa walks, but Zapata does. Why?

I'm only guessing but I would hypothesize that Zapata has an advanced approach and is particularly good at pitch recognition for his age.  Add to that the typical wildness that he's likely facing and that might explain such an exceptional walk rate.

Hopefully, he maintains that at higher levels.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2011, 12:49:30 am
I'm only guessing but I would hypothesize that Zapata has an advanced approach and is particularly good at pitch recognition for his age.


Probably so which was part of my point; that even by 17 hitters usually have particular skills and tendencies at the plate, and they rarely seem to change.

Brett Jackson was patient in college and he's been patient since being drafted.

DJ Lemahieu rarely walked in college and that trend has continued.

I don't think it's that easy for teams to reverse the tendencies of their hitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2011, 04:32:12 am
Devoss' 5 steals the most by a player in a NWL game in 30 years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 19, 2011, 08:02:44 am
Quote
Sam Fuld on fangraphs wrote:
Isuppose it depends on who your manager is, and who your front office is. I came up in the Cubs system, and they’re probably not as involved in the statistics side of the game as some other organizations. It still is important to me to get on base, even though (laughs) there were some guys who, all they cared about was my average.

Keri: Were they telling you, “be aggressive, be aggressive, swing, swing, swing?”

Fuld: Yeah, I definitely got a lot of that sort of instruction. It’s frustrating, but it’s reality. You have to please your boss before anybody else. That’s one of the things I’m actually looking forward to in going to the Rays, is maybe a little more advanced thinking when it comes to the numbers of baseball.

Not very surprising there.

Where did you find that craig?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 19, 2011, 08:15:02 am
I know I'm late to the "hacker" definition debate, but to me a hacker is one who swings at pitches that most would regard as poor pitches to hit, regardless of his success rate.  Clemente and Vlad are good examples of guys who could hit anything.  "Disciplined hitter" is one who rarely misses a pitch in his zone or a pitcher's mistake.  Gwynn and Brett and Yastrzemski as examples.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 19, 2011, 11:35:03 am
I agree that the best stat to indicate a hacker is the number of pitches seen per plate appearance.  But I haven't seen a good place to get that stat for minor leaguers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 19, 2011, 01:30:48 pm
Does anyone have a list of the totally home grown players from the Cub organization who have made it to the MLs over the past 20 years, and how the number and impact of such players compares with home grown players from other ML organizations?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 19, 2011, 01:51:22 pm
This discussion has gone in all kinds of directions.  I think there are basically four different corners:
*The Cub farm system has done a good job with drafting and development.  The outcome has been and projects to be excellent.  There is no need to change anything at the procurement/development level.  (OK, nobody has really articulated that standpoint since Scotti left, but that is the one everything-is-going-well-and-will-only-get-better take that Scotti, Hendry, and Fleita advertise.) 

*The Cub farm system has been disappointing, but it's just bad luck, it's nobody's fault. Corey just happened to fail; Wood and Prior just happened to get hurt.   If those three had worked out better, the farm system production would be legendary and we'd be on the back end of a golden-age of Cubdom. 

*It's been bad and it's development (Fleita's) fault.  Wilken is drafting fine, but it's a development problem.  Dave's view that the development people are doing a poor job with the hitters follows this focus.

*It's been bad and it's procurement (Wilken's) fault.  Chris's view is that guys start with tendencies and keep them, so if all of our farm teams are last in their leagues in walks, it's because with a few exceptions Wilken drafts guys with anti-walk tendencies, and you can't expect Fleita to change them.  Wilken, Stockstill, and Hendry draft hitters like Golden, Vitters, Jackson, Corey, Harvey, Dopirak.  You can't expect Fleita to turn them into hitters if they just don't really have the ability.  Wilken and his predecessors drafted hitters both bad and impatient; development can't be blamed when they remain bad and impatient. 

*Jeff's corner:  don't try to excuse development or draft, replace them all. 


reb and Chris have reasoned that most hitters don't change.  Guys are already what they are by the time they join the farm.  Dave has suggested that some players could make some productive adjustment, but they aren't encouraged in the patience direction by the Cubs, and are perhaps instead encouraged in the non-patient be-aggressive mode. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 19, 2011, 01:55:13 pm
I agree with the second point to the extent that if Wood and Prior hadn't been injured, but instead had careers consistant with their early years, we would still be singing the praises of McPhail and Hendry.  The Cubs have often been successful with not only the drafting, but also the development of pitching.  It is position players where their shortfallings become obvious.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 19, 2011, 02:10:13 pm
The Cubs have often been successful with not only the drafting, but also the development of pitching. 

The Cubs haven't been very successful at developing starting pitchers in a while either, though.  In terms of starting pitchers since Carlos Zambrano came up, we've had one season of Rich Hill and looking like two seasons of Randy Wells, and that's it. 

When a farm has to resort to the likes of Rodrigo Lopez, Doug Davis, and Ramon Ortiz to fill in for injured starting pitchers and can't produce competent replacements on its own, your farm system isn't currently doing a very good job of developing starting pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 19, 2011, 02:44:45 pm
Quote
It's been bad and it's development (Fleita's) fault.  Wilken is drafting fine, but it's a development problem. 

It's now Year 6 of Tim Wilken, and right now the only quality major leaguers on the roster Wilken has drafted are Darwin Barney and James Russell.  (Maybe the Rays don't do the Matt Garza trade without Brandon Guyer, who was the only Wilken guy in that trade, but more than likely that trade didn't quite totally hinge on Guyer being involved.) 

I'm not sure how much of that blame should go to Fleita for Wilken's drafts not producing more for the Cubs than they have so far, although I think there is plenty.  With as much value most teams place on drawing walks in this age, it's pretty bad when important picks like Tyler Colvin and Josh Vitters are allowed to get away with such pitiful walk rates.  Watching guys like Colvin and Samardzija in the big leagues, I think it's obvious both of those guys have some really good raw talent, but the development for both of them probably was botched.  Samardzija's handling in the minors in particular left a lot to be desired. 

But is it totally Fleita's fault that Wilken has given him a dumb as bricks #3 overall pick like Vitters, a wild injury prone $1.5 million lottery ticket like Chris Huseby, first round overdrafts like Colvin or Hayden Simpson, or low ceilng picks like Ty Wright, Marquez Smith, Blair Springfield, Aaron Shafer, etc.? 

I've been pretty neutral on Wilken's tenure for the most part (haven't bought into Wilken's "genius" but haven't really dogged him like Stockstill either), but this far into Wilken's time drafting, we should be seeing a lot more production than we're getting.  I think it's at least fair to say the Wilken-Fleita procurement and development program hasn't been as good as has been advertised the last 2-3 years.  I definitely think we need someone other than Fleita developing players, but I'm getting closer into Jeff's camp that we just need a complete overhaul.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 19, 2011, 02:58:45 pm
As to Wilken, let's see how B. Jackson, Flaherty, and LeMahieu pan out next season.  They are all on the cusp of the majors and may have prominent roles very soon.  And, brass seem to be fast tracking Szczur.  How these guys pan out will say a lot about Wilken's tenure, one way or the other.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 19, 2011, 03:18:14 pm
Reb, I like the word "cusp."  The Cubs are on the cusp.  Has a nice ring to it.  Better than "the Cubs are in the cuspidor" for example.  Although, that may be the next step...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 19, 2011, 03:32:29 pm
As to Wilken, let's see how B. Jackson, Flaherty, and LeMahieu pan out next season.  They are all on the cusp of the majors and may have prominent roles very soon.  And, brass seem to be fast tracking Szczur.  How these guys pan out will say a lot about Wilken's tenure, one way or the other.

Didn't quite realize Wilken had been here six years (is that right?).  But he presumably had to rely on others who were already in place when he got here, until he could make whatever changes he needed to have people who fit his expectations.  If that took a couple of years (just a guess), that means four years - which seems about the right amount of time to expect to see results at the major league level.  Is that a reasonable timeline? I really don't know, so am asking that as a serious question.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 19, 2011, 03:33:53 pm
Curt, I was actually trying to say they're all sitting on the C--- of the majors but the censor got it, unfortunately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 19, 2011, 03:40:16 pm
JR - although it is difficult to overcome previous convictions, if you look at the stats as an impartial observer, you might see that Samardzija has performed as a quality major league reliever this year.  And even Russel has done extremely well in his relief appearances, as opposed to his starting performance.

And you and others consistently omit mentioning Castro when talking about Wilken performance.  I know the standard wisdom is that he has no power over overseas signings, but it has been my understanding that as director of scouting, both domestic and overseas scouts report to him.  I know that recently a friend of mine was hired to go to the DR and give reports on the prospects there.  I know for a fact that he was hired by Wilken.  I also know for a fact that Wilken personally scouted Lee before he signed in Korea, so perhaps he has had a hand in other areas beyond the draft.  Has anyone actually seen an organizational chart of the current Cubs organization?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 19, 2011, 03:50:22 pm
Given the paltry bonus that Castro received, seems highly unlikely that his acquisition reached the Wilken level in the organization hierarchy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 19, 2011, 04:01:42 pm
Probably so.  But he was still signed by someone on Wilken's staff.  If he is at fault for the failures, he should be given credit for the successes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 19, 2011, 04:41:48 pm
Many of Hendry's most promising picks eventually faded, but were highly rated as prospects. Stockstill was a disaster. Wilken his been fine so far (IMHO).

On the development side, several of our better minor league pitching coaches have left for other organizations. Our minor league teams seem to have had more turnover among their managers and coaches than the big league club, which I find totally unacceptable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 19, 2011, 07:38:05 pm
Ceasar with a home run tonight, his first at Daytona.  Watkins with two more hits, including a double.  He has turned a terrible start into a decent year, and even added a little extra base power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2011, 08:20:45 pm
Szczur: 2-5, HR, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_19_dbcafa_braafa_1


Candelario must be fine:  1-1, 2 BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_19_dwarok_dchrok_1



Peoria and Tennessee idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2011, 10:12:18 pm
Jackson: 0-3, 2 BB, K

Castillo: 2-3, HR, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_19_nasaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 19, 2011, 11:26:30 pm
Catching up with posts and noticed the Sam Fuld quote from JR's post about the Cub system encouraging our hackaway approach.   In this day and age, that's gross incompetence.

When will the McPhail/Hendry/horrid Cub front office nightmare end?

Sure appears Ricketts is as clueless as his predecessors.
   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 19, 2011, 11:33:40 pm
DeVoss has interesting stats after his first game in Boise.

Batting average    .000

On Base average .800

Slugging average  .000

OPS                       .800

He screwed up his OBA in tonight's game.  It is only .750 tonight.

I suppose the odd numbers could be in part due to small sample size.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 12:08:20 am
I'd take Fuld's comments more seriously if his walk rate in Tampa wasn't half of what it was as a Cub.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 12:10:43 am
Hoilman: 1-4, HR, RBI, 2 K


Wang: 4-1-0-0-3-7 , ( 37 K's in 33-2/3 IP )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_19_boiasx_spoasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 12:50:15 am
Zapata: 2-4, BB, SB

Amaya: 3-4, SB

Rosario: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 2 K, PB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_19_mrnrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 20, 2011, 07:18:04 am
After DeVoss's 5-steal game, he promptly got picked off his first time on yesterday.  Of his 3 hits, one was an infield hit, another a bunt, one a grounder to the outfield.  He hit into a DP another time, so I'm assuming with his speed he must have hit that pretty sharply. 

He got pinch-hit for in the 9th.  Perhaps just a courtesy to one of the bench guys in a non-close game, or perhaps DeVoss is hurt already? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 20, 2011, 07:24:36 am
..
Rosario: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 2 K, PB
...

The PB and 2K's aren't great in debut, but two hits are nice. 

More noteworthy, he gunned 4 out of 4 basestealers.  Wow.  Not sure I've ever seen that in one game.  That's awfully encouraging if we had a catcher where pop-time throwing might be a closed-book don't-worry-about-it he's-good situation. 



Chris has mentioned that guys tend to stay with their tendencies.  Szczur had an asset walk rate early, and overall at peoria he was fine.  Now he's 1 walk in 35 AB t Daytona.  Perhaps he can't do both at the same time.  But it kind of seems like the walks went off when the at-least-some-power went on.  The stolen bases also went off perhaps at about the same time. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 20, 2011, 09:49:08 am
And you and others consistently omit mentioning Castro when talking about Wilken performance.  I know the standard wisdom is that he has no power over overseas signings, but it has been my understanding that as director of scouting, both domestic and overseas scouts report to him.  I know that recently a friend of mine was hired to go to the DR and give reports on the prospects there.  I know for a fact that he was hired by Wilken.  I also know for a fact that Wilken personally scouted Lee before he signed in Korea, so perhaps he has had a hand in other areas beyond the draft.  Has anyone actually seen an organizational chart of the current Cubs organization?

Here is the "Front Office" page at cubs.com. 

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/team/front_office.jsp?c_id=chc (http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/team/front_office.jsp?c_id=chc)

In the Scouting Department, Tim Wilken is listed first as "Director, Amateur and Professional Scouting", and Paul Weaver is listed second as "Director, International Scouting". 

It's tough to tell from that if Wilken oversees Weaver, or if Wilken and Weaver are at the same level in the organization.  Both are listed as "Directors", so that sounds to me like both are at the same level. 

Also, here is a recent article in the Tribune about our international scouting.

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-07-02/sports/chi-110702-city-series-around-town_1_fleita-starlin-castro-cubs (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-07-02/sports/chi-110702-city-series-around-town_1_fleita-starlin-castro-cubs)

Quote
"Outside of the amateur draft, which Tim Wilken and his staff oversee, my assistant Paul Weaver is the director of international scouting," Cubs vice president/player personnel Oneri Fleita told me before the Cubs dropped a 1-0 decision Saturday to the White Sox.

From that, it sounds like international and domestic amateur scouting are independent of each other, and Weaver reports to Fleita and not Wilken.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 20, 2011, 10:04:41 am
I wonder now after reading that if Wilken technically reports to Fleita. 

Fleita is the VP of Player Personnel, and it sounds like "Director" Weaver reports to him for international scouting.  Almost sounds to me like "Director" Wilken also has to be underneath Fleita in the organizational hierarchy.  I imagine Wilken probably has a lot more autonomy in the organization than Weaver does, though.
 
(By the way, when Weaver was promoted to Director of International Scouting, it was Fleita making the announcement. http://chicago-cubs.info/369/chicago-cubs-baseball/weaver-serra-promoted-by-cubs/ (http://chicago-cubs.info/369/chicago-cubs-baseball/weaver-serra-promoted-by-cubs/))
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 20, 2011, 11:42:24 am
Thanks, JR.  I know that Fleita was the director of Latin scouting, and perhaps all international, for a long time.  When Hendry was farm and draft boss, among Fleita's roles was overseeing international.  So it may be that Weaver was hired under that framework, and Fleita was still formally in charge, but essentially Weaver got hired by Fleita in that branch of Fleita's responsibilities. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 20, 2011, 11:59:39 am
ArizonaPhil

The 17-year old right-handed hitting Rosario struck out in both of his first two at bats (and looked bad doing it), before delivering a laser-shot liner off the top of the LF fence on a 2-2 slider that drove-in Dong-Yub Kim from second-base, and missed being a two-run HR by inches.


Rosario also looped a single to right-center in the 7th, and lined a rocket (unfortunately) right at the third-baseman for the final out of the game.


Rosario showed-off his arm from behind the plate, too, nabbing two base-stealers, and throwing out another trying to take an extra base on a Wild Pitch.


On the negative side, while he has a strong arm, he has a lot of work to do on his catching mechanics & receiving skills. He was charged with one Passed Ball (could have been two), and was consistently unable to block pitches in the dirt, resulting in four Wild Pitches charged against Cubs pitchers.


Rosario also is a sucker for high fastballs, swinging through most every one he saw. But when he did connect, he displayed outstanding bat-speed and plus-power.


He reminds me a lot of Welington Castillo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 20, 2011, 12:05:40 pm
More

Playing 3B tonight (he moves around between 2B-3B-SS, but his best defensive position is 3B), Gioskar Amaya had three more hits, raising his slash line to 400/435/488 (he is now 4th in the AZL in hitting). The 18-year old Venezuelan also scored two runs, stole a base, and laid-down a picture-perfect textbook sacrifice bunt. He is a magician with the bat, an ideal #2 hitter.

With Taiwan Easterling having been promoted to Peoria and Zeke DeVoss having been moved up to Boise, 18-year old Dominican CF Oliver Zapata is back in his accustomed lead-off slot, where he has excelled all year. He reached base three more times tonight on two singles and a walk, and he also stole a base and scored a run. A 5'9, round, bowling ball of a young man with a Kirby Puckett-like physique, the speedy switch-hitting Zapata has taken the lead-off gig very seriously, shortening his swing and following each pitch into the catcher's glove, just like Pete Rose used to do. As a result, he leads the AZL in walks. He also has been running the bases with abandon, having stolen 10 (good for 3rd the AZL) while getting thrown-out just twice.

After missing six weeks with a broken hand suffered when he was hit by a pitch in the final game of Extended Spring Training, OF Jesus Morelli returned to the AZL Cubs lineup Monday night versus the AZL Dodgers, going 0-3 with a walk. But he had a very good game tonight against the Mariners, driving-in a run with an RBI single in the bottom of the 3rd, and clubbing a game-tying 400+ ft solo HR over the left-centerfield fence in the bottom of the 5th. He also threw out a runner trying to score on a fly ball out to LF. (Morelli has a RF arm, so it's almost "no contest" when the opposition tries runs on him when he's playing LF).

Morelli was seemingly destined for a return trip ticket to Boise when he suffered the broken hand (he spent most of last season at Boise, too), so he probably won't be staying in Mesa too much longer. It would just be a matter of clearing a roster slot for him at Boise. (Actually, when he leaves, he really should be going to Peoria).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 20, 2011, 12:09:55 pm
More

Playing 3B tonight (he moves around between 2B-3B-SS, but his best defensive position is 3B), Gioskar Amaya had three more hits, raising his slash line to 400/435/488 (he is now 4th in the AZL in hitting). The 18-year old Venezuelan also scored two runs, stole a base, and laid-down a picture-perfect textbook sacrifice bunt. He is a magician with the bat, an ideal #2 hitter.

With Taiwan Easterling having been promoted to Peoria and Zeke DeVoss having been moved up to Boise, 18-year old Dominican CF Oliver Zapata is back in his accustomed lead-off slot, where he has excelled all year. He reached base three more times tonight on two singles and a walk, and he also stole a base and scored a run. A 5'9, round, bowling ball of a young man with a Kirby Puckett-like physique, the speedy switch-hitting Zapata has taken the lead-off gig very seriously, shortening his swing and following each pitch into the catcher's glove, just like Pete Rose used to do. As a result, he leads the AZL in walks. He also has been running the bases with abandon, having stolen 10 (good for 3rd the AZL) while getting thrown-out just twice.
After missing six weeks with a broken hand suffered when he was hit by a pitch in the final game of Extended Spring Training, OF Jesus Morelli returned to the AZL Cubs lineup Monday night versus the AZL Dodgers, going 0-3 with a walk. But he had a very good game tonight against the Mariners, driving-in a run with an RBI single in the bottom of the 3rd, and clubbing a game-tying 400+ ft solo HR over the left-centerfield fence in the bottom of the 5th. He also threw out a runner trying to score on a fly ball out to LF. (Morelli has a RF arm, so it's almost "no contest" when the opposition tries runs on him when he's playing LF).

Morelli was seemingly destined for a return trip ticket to Boise when he suffered the broken hand (he spent most of last season at Boise, too), so he probably won't be staying in Mesa too much longer. It would just be a matter of clearing a roster slot for him at Boise. (Actually, when he leaves, he really should be going to Peoria).
It would be only fair to Zapata to move him to another organization where his skills would be valued and properly developed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 20, 2011, 01:28:03 pm
It would be only fair to Zapata to move him to another organization where his skills would be valued and properly developed.

Or swiftly replace the impotent numbskulls in charge of his current organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 03:49:02 pm
Quote
More noteworthy, he gunned 4 out of 4 basestealers.

I think they label CS's wrong, Craig. I counted just one caught by Rosario and Az Phil says two. A couple of them were pickoffs by the pitcher.

Looking over the PBP again, I still count just one. There was a wild pitch in which the runner was nailed at the plate, but surely they didn't count that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 03:52:10 pm
Starting to see why the Dodgers sacrificed Wallach in the Lilly deal.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_20_dbcafa_braafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 03:58:57 pm
Callis time, with one question from a guy not paying attention:

Quote
Roger (Chicago, IL): Jim - Matt Szczur seems to be handling himself just fine so far in High A. If all goes right does he project to have a plus hit tool and hit for at least average power with good dee? Any comp that scouts or yourself liken him to?


Jim Callis: He has a chance to have average power, but even if he doesn't, he should have well above-average speed with plus defense and a plus bat. Sounds like a righthanded-hitting Jacoby Ellsbury to me.

....


Quote
ittox (Puerto Rico): Can you make a quick Chicago Cubs top 10 prospects including the ones drafted in 2011?


Jim Callis: That's an Ask BA question, not a chat question. Top three prospects in order for me right now would be Brett Jackson, Matt Szczur, Javier Baez. Could debate various combinations of those three, too.


......


Quote
Tim (Chicago): Should Cubs fans be excited about how well Josh Vitters has adjusted to AA?


Jim Callis: He's still only 21, and he still almost never takes a walk. I wouldn't get excited, but I do think he can be a big league regular.


.......


Quote
Tony (Frederick, MD): Speaking of the Greinke deal, what was your take on the Garza deal back then (and how it compared to the Greinke deal), and what is your take on the Garza deal now? I am a big fan of Chirinos, who, after a bad April, has really swung a good bat, and Guyer has blossomed. Lee still garners the hype, and Archer still seems to have the stuff to make it in the pen, at the very least.


Jim Callis: Thought the Cubs paid a lot, though the players they gave up were somewhat redundant in their system, but they had some sense of desperation in trying to make the big league club better. Thought it made perfect sense for the Rays with Hellickson ready to step in. The Cubs' season hasn't gone as they hoped, but I bet both teams would make the trade again.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 20, 2011, 04:00:55 pm
Starting to see why the Dodgers sacrificed Wallach in the Lilly deal.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_20_dbcafa_braafa_1

That trade was a complete failure and a shining example of Jim Hendry's shortcomings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 20, 2011, 04:09:22 pm
Quote from Jim Callis: Thought the Cubs paid a lot, though the players they gave up were somewhat redundant in their system, but they had some sense of desperation in trying to make the big league club better. Thought it made perfect sense for the Rays with Hellickson ready to step in. The Cubs' season hasn't gone as they hoped, but I bet both teams would make the trade again.

Although I was strongly opposed to the trade when it happened, it made some sense if you assumed that the Cubs were going to be "competitive" in 2011. If the Cubs' brass really would make that trade today, they need to walk the plan before sunset.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 04:22:39 pm
I was unhappy giving up Archer and Lee, but pitchers like Garza don't grow on trees or come cheap. And he's not a rental.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 20, 2011, 04:29:02 pm
Am I the only one who still has no problem with the Garza deal?  Garza is 27 years old, and he's been excellent this year. 

Yes, it sucks for the Cubs that Lee has really broken out since leaving.  But it's not like the Cubs traded him for a barely league average starter heading for free agency. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 20, 2011, 05:00:31 pm
I'm very happy to have Garza, despite the high price.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 20, 2011, 05:11:07 pm
Besides, it's only fair that at least one of those guys works out for Tampa.  If Lee becomes a good player for them, that's fair.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 20, 2011, 06:06:42 pm
Garza's only real contribution this year will be to give Houston the first pick in the draft. Next year, we'll win nothing, and might finish high enough in the standings to lose our first-round draft pick if we sign a free agent (unless the rules change). We may, or may not, be competitive in 2013. After that, Garza's a free agent.

Personally, I'd send him to back to Tampa Bay for Lee in a straight-up trade. However, I do realize Garza is more valuable now. So I'd listen to other offers first.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 09:10:20 pm
Kirk: 3-8-9-9-1-3 , HB

Easterling: 2-4, HR, RBI, SB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_20_peoafx_dayafx_1

Vitters: 0-3, SF, RBI, K, E ,  (3 for last 17)

Ha: 0-5,  (7-34 last 10 GMs)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_20_cmcaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 10:04:50 pm
Lemahieu: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, K, E, CS

Jackson: 6 IP, 7 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_20_nasaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 20, 2011, 10:34:52 pm
I was frustrated with the trade, because I have always been a prospect nut.  And they gave away the 4 I liked the best.  But I have seen enough of Garza to realize that he is worth a lot, and I expect him to be doing well for 4 or 5 years at least, barring injury, which caveat applies to every pitcher.

The success of the deal really depends upon if they can replace those kids with new kids of equal ability in a relatively short period of time.

As someone said, Garza is hardly a rental player.  He is here for a fairly long time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 20, 2011, 10:44:43 pm
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_20_dbcafa_braafa_1
I think they label CS's wrong, Craig. I counted just one caught by Rosario and Az Phil says two. A couple of them were pickoffs by the pitcher.

Looking over the PBP again, I still count just one. There was a wild pitch in which the runner was nailed at the plate, but surely they didn't count that.

Hm,  I didn't read through the PBP, just looked at the box. 

"BASERUNNING
CS: Castillo, P (4, 2nd base by Sanchez, Yi/Rosario), Cochrane (1, 2nd base by Rodriguez, S/Rosario), Peguero, M 2 (3, 2nd base by Pugliese/Rosario, 2nd base by Pugliese/Rosario)" 

I just saw the four throwouts all attributed to Rosario, and just assumed they were all throwouts by Rosario.  Not the first time those box scores have been dopey.  Too bad it isn't true and that Phil's report is so negative.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 20, 2011, 11:54:30 pm
Golden was out on a straight steal of home today.  I think there have been more straight steals of home, successful or otherwise, in the Cubs organization than I ever remember.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2011, 11:56:03 pm
Golden: 2-4, 2B, 3B, 2 RBI, K, CS

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_20_boiasx_spoasx_1

Candelario: 1-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_20_dchrok_dphrok_1


Candelario: 2-4, 2B, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_20_dchrok_dphrok_2




Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 21, 2011, 03:39:59 pm
A question from an old interview with Tim Wilken...I thought it applied to some discussions going on here.  I was originally googling his name and toronto draft picks to see if they were as walk challenged as the Cubs own are. 

Quote
DL: Some player development systems are better at producing hitters, while others are more successful with pitchers. Should that play a role in your draft philosophy?

TW: No. My thought process, for the most part, is that player development plays a role, but it's more important that I get the player right. If he's good enough, a player will make it--with or without the ideal system.

Here is the link.   http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=6102

I thought it was interesting to go back and read now that he has been with the Cubs for a while.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 21, 2011, 03:55:26 pm
He's probably changed his mind.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 21, 2011, 08:22:01 pm
As good as the Cubs minor league teams were in the first part of the season, that is how bad they have been recently.

Nice to see Easterling meeting the challanges of his promotion well so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2011, 09:08:02 pm
Szczur: 0-4, 2 K, Assist

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_21_pbcafa_dbcafa_1


Peralta: 2 IP, 9 R, 3 HR

Geiger: 0-3, K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_21_peoafx_dayafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2011, 09:28:07 pm
Vitters: 1-3, HR, 3 RBI, BB, K

Beliveau: 2-1-0-0-0-3

Rhoderick: 1/3 IP, 6 H, 7 R


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_21_cmcaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2011, 10:12:33 pm
Jackson: 0-5, 3 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_21_nasaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2011, 11:00:20 pm
Golden: 1-4, 2B, 2 K

Kim: 3-1/3 -5-3-3-1-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_21_yakasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2011, 11:58:09 pm
Zapata: 2-5, 2B, RBI

Ackerman: 5-5-1-0-0-6

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_21_cubrok_clerok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 22, 2011, 08:37:29 am
Marwin Gonzalez continues to have a really good year. He's 22 years old, he's got great size -- 6' 1" 185 --- and he's a switch hitter. of course, he's blocked at SS and the Cubs' have a boatload of 2nd base options and he doesn't seem to have the pop you want at 3B. But, still....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 22, 2011, 09:37:49 am
Marwin Gonzalez continues to have a really good year. He's 22 years old, he's got great size -- 6' 1" 185 --- and he's a switch hitter. of course, he's blocked at SS and the Cubs' have a boatload of 2nd base options and he doesn't seem to have the pop you want at 3B. But, still....

What is the story on Gonzalez, anyway?  I don't recall ever seeing him mentioned as a prospect, yet his recent numbers at a premier position would seem to suggest that he could be one.  Does he have a lead glove or what?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 22, 2011, 11:35:21 am
He was considered a prospect a couple of years ago, when his name was mentioned about equally with Castro and Lake.  But like Lake, he didn't really progress very well as he advanced up the system.  He was said to be expected to grow into a little power.

Also under the general notice this year is that Lake has had quite a good year in Daytona.  He is currently hurt, and I don't know how seriously, but he has shown both power, average and speed this year.  He was always considered to be rather uncoachable, a flake, and most serious, lazy.  None the less, he seems to have all the talent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2011, 12:23:29 pm
I'd call Lake's year extremely mixed. He hit for average and some power at Daytona, but has struggled in Knoxville. He has terrible walk/strikeout ratios, is an error machine, and has been called out by both his team and more than one observer here for lack of effort and mental mistakes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 22, 2011, 01:29:45 pm
I'd call Lake's year extremely mixed. He hit for average and some power at Daytona, but has struggled in Knoxville. He has terrible walk/strikeout ratios, is an error machine, and has been called out by both his team and more than one observer here for lack of effort and mental mistakes.
So what's the problem?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2011, 08:38:00 pm
Helium Watch of the latest  BA Hot Sheet:

Quote
Marco Hernandez, ss, Cubs: The Cubs have added a wave of Latin American talent to the lower levels of their farm system. As a result, the organization now faces a dilemma, albeit a good one, in trying to sort out playing time for Hernandez and Gioskar Amaya with its Rookie-level Arizona club. Amaya, an 18-year-old from Venezuela, has played mostly second base, though he's also spent time at shortstop and third base, while Hernandez, an 18-year-old Dominican, has been the primary shortstop but also has played a bit at second. At the plate, they have both excelled in their U.S. debuts. Amaya is hitting .390/.427/.476, showing advanced baseball instincts for his age. Hernandez is the better athlete with a more lively, projectable body (6 feet, 170 pounds) and has hit .310/.355/.410 through 24 games. Hernandez has good bat speed from the left side and shows good bat-to-ball ability, though he projects more as a doubles hitter than a power threat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2011, 08:44:40 pm
Late reporting box from yesterday's DSL 2 game:

Baez: 3-5, 3B, 5 RBI, K, PO

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&gid=2011_07_21_danrok_dchrok_1&cid=2270&t=g_box
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2011, 09:43:13 pm
Jackson: 1-4, 3 K , ( 6-33, 16 K's at Iowa )

Castillo: 3-4, 2B, HR, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_22_iowaaa_nasaaa_1


Geiger: 2-4, 2 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_22_peoafx_dayafx_1


Vitters: 0-4, E (20)

Ha: 1-4, HR, RBI, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_22_cmcaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2011, 10:14:03 pm
Szczur: 0-3, SB, BB, K

Rhee: 4-9-5-5-2-5 , (1st inning: 4 R, 6 H )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_22_pbcafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2011, 10:15:47 pm

Candelario: 1-4, 3-run HR

Penalver: 3-4, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_22_dchrok_drgrok_1


Sanchez: 1-3, 2B, RBI, 2 BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_22_dorrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2011, 11:52:11 pm
Devoss: 2-4, BB, SB, E

Golden: 0-4, RBI, BB, 2 K , ( 13 K's last 28 AB's )

Cruz: 6-6-1-1-2-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_22_yakasx_boiasx_1


Simpson: 1-0-2-0-1-1 , HB

Zapata pinch-hit for in the 1st after committing 2-run error in top of the inning.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_22_cinrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2011, 03:21:59 am
Small piece on Wes Darvill:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/07/23/1736237/shortstop-is-a-bright-spot-for.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2011, 03:23:26 am
Note from Daytona's game:

One of the best moments of the night for the Cubs was a bit of defense by Szczur in center field. Szczur robbed Palm Beach of a scoring opportunity in the third inning with a spectacular diving catch for a putout that held the runners at first and second.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 23, 2011, 06:35:57 am
Note from Daytona's game:

One of the best moments of the night for the Cubs was a bit of defense by Szczur in center field. Szczur robbed Palm Beach of a scoring opportunity in the third inning with a spectacular diving catch for a putout that held the runners at first and second.

Chris - Thanks once again for providing not only stats from minor league games, but notes like this one.  This has become a staple for the board, and it's too easy for us to take it for granted.  I think (virtually) everyone appreciates it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on July 23, 2011, 09:07:15 am
I'm sorry but Ty Wright got completely crapped on by them wanting to give Jackson a chance. He was doing great in Iowa and is absolutely murdering AA pitching, I think its time to make the swap back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 23, 2011, 10:27:28 am
JR, you're be asked for in Aisle 5.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 23, 2011, 10:33:37 am
It is the opinion of more than one baseball person I have talked to that the failure of Patterson and Pie specifically WAS because of the way they were handled by the Cubs.  I don't dispute, however, that opinions are generally impossible to prove one way or the other.

Still seems too early to write Pie off as a failure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 23, 2011, 10:35:12 am
As to Cubs farm teams not walking this season, it's one season.  Show me some data over a bunch of seasons and I'll be interested in that.

But seeing it accross the board weakens the argument that it is a fluke... and if you look at past seasons you will see the same thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 23, 2011, 11:15:47 am
I though it was interesting in looking at Wilken's draft record that it looks like his success of first round pick's at least making the majors will hold with the Cubs. 

Colvin has made it from 2006.  In 2007, Cubs took Vitters and Josh Donaldson in the first and first supplemental.  Donaldson has already made it for a cup of coffee, and pretty safe to say Vitters will make it, although it remains to be seen how good he will be.  Cashner has already made it from 2008, though it remains to be seen how healthy he will be.  Flaherty was a supplemental first from that year, and I think it's safe to say he will make it.  It's only a matter of time before Brett Jackson from 2009 makes it.

Hayden Simpson is a serious question mark, but i do think one stat is at least interesting with him, and that is that he has 52 k's in 70.2 innings pitched for a 6.6 k/9 rate for the year, and was 6.8 at Peoria before going back to azl.  Provided he really is throwing an 85 or 83 or whatever it is mph fastball up there right now, if he ever does recover from mono and get his stuff back, I think he has a bright future.  I really didn't expect his k rate to be that high this year as soft as he is tossing...not that 6.6 is all that high, but i don't think it's bad for as much speed as he has lost off his fastball.  i think it's harder for someone like him to pitch with an 85 mph fastball than someone who has had to do it his whole life.  Hopefully, having to learn how to do it will benefit him in the long run.

And who knows from Javier Baez, but I think he sounds really promising.

And, now, the players taken before Wilken's arrival(1999-2005), including first round supplemental picks:  Ben Christensen, Lou Montanez, Mark Prior, Bobbie Brownlie, Luke Hagerty, Chadd Blasko, Matthew Clanton, Ryan Harvey, and Mark Pawalek.

I'm not sure how many of Wilkens picks are going to be all-stars, but I do like that they all at least look like they can make the majors.  The more guys you have with major league talent, the more likely at least a couple will end up all-stars, even if most amount to nothing more than average or bench guys.  No matter what anyone says about Wilkens, I can tell a difference in the quality of our first round picks.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 23, 2011, 12:15:44 pm
Javier Baez is a complete and total failure.  Not only has he not made it to the majors, he hasn't even has a single home run as a professional.

It was purely a reach pick designed to make Wilken look smarter than his fellow drafters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 23, 2011, 12:24:29 pm
Cubs prospect DeVoss shining early at Boise
 Recommend   Comment(0)   Email   Print   Facebook     RSS
Friday July 22, 2011
Posted: 11:00 a.m.

By Kevin T. Czerwinski
CSNChicago.com

That Zeke DeVoss isn’t feeling any pressure each evening as he pulls on his Boise Hawks uniform and trots out to second base shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, not if you really know anything about this truly remarkable young man from Florida.

That DeVoss, whom the Cubs selected in the third-round of last month’s First-Year Player Draft, has gotten off to a hot start shouldn’t come as much of a shock either, not if you saw what he was able to do while playing at the University of Miami.

The thought that DeVoss will likely emerge as a leader as he makes his way through the Chicago system also seems pretty obvious after spending a few minutes speaking with the speedster, who celebrated his 21st birthday this week. He’s thoughtful and has an insight that belies his age while the journey he’s taken to get to Idaho is far greater than the distance between Miami and Boise.

“It’s been going real well for me, I’m definitely having fun,” DeVoss said. “I didn’t expect it to be quite like this, the living out of bags and traveling more. I’m moving from here to there but it’s a fun transition.

“I don’t take pressure on field. Some people can and some people would but it’s a game and meant to be fun. I’ve been playing my entire life and you can’t play uptight. You have to have fun. When I’m not on field, put everything behind me so I don’t look at it as a job. I don’t have to hit or perform.  I just play loose and have fun and the results will come.”

So far, that approach has worked. DeVoss has hit safely in seven of the eight games in which he’s played, four each with the AZL Cubs and the Hawks. He’s hitting .367 with nine stolen bases and a .472 OBP. While it’s a small sample, one of the biggest numbers that stands out is the zero under the strikeout column in 13 Northwest League at-bats.

DeVoss is showing patience at the plate, another rare quality for many young ballplayers. He played that way at Miami, as well, leading the team with 57 walks while striking out only 30 times in 215 at-bats. He had a .491 OBP and stole 31 bases for the Hurricanes while splitting time between second base and the outfield.

“The game isn’t much different than Miami,” he said. “It’s the same game that I’ve been playing my entire life. I’m just playing with a different bat now, different people, a different uniform. It isn’t going to change much as you move up. It’s just going to be a faster pace.”

There isn’t much that seems to faze DeVoss. He’s experienced a great deal in his life and it would appear that he is able to keep baseball in perspective. DeVoss is one of three children that Mark and Angie DeVoss adopted. The couple also has a biological fourth child.

Mark and Angie DeVoss are white while Zeke and his adopted brother and sister are not. While his family portrait may draw some stares from a few folks, Zeke DeVoss couldn’t have found a better place to grow up and people from whom he could learn about life outside of baseball.

“I’m sure not a lot of people don’t know that I’m adopted and that’s something I’ve had to deal with entire life,” DeVoss said. “My parents are a different color than me. My brothers and sister are different color so we get a lot of looks out in public. People probably think we’re weird. But we consider each other family and nothing else.

“I’ve never really ever let it [the attention] bother me. There have been some times when I was really young in grade school where people would make fun of me and say stuff like you don’t know who your real parents are. But my parents have always treated me as son and don’t treat me differently. They have always been there for me and supported me and I consider them real parents and care takers, which they are.”

DeVoss grew up in Brevard County, on Florida’s East Coast, a stone’s throw from the Kennedy Space Center where his father works as a software engineer. When the space shuttle program came to an end this week, it conjured many childhood memories for DeVoss, who witnessed many of the shuttle launches.

“It was something I got to see a lot of,” DeVoss said. “When it went up, you could see it over the trees in our front yard. Or you could go up on the roof and watch and it would always shake the house. For someone who has never seen it, I guess you could take it for granted that you’ve seen the shuttle go up every single time.

“It’s kind of sad to see the program come to an end. But everything comes to an end at some point. Luckily, my dad will hold on over there.”

If DeVoss can remain as hot as he has through his first two weeks as a pro, there’s a good chance he’ll be playing close to home at some point next year. The Cubs affiliate in the Florida State League is in Daytona, which isn’t too far up the coast from Brevard County. And, the Brevard County Manatees play right at Space Coast Stadium, which is practically in DeVoss’ backyard.

DeVoss won’t look that far ahead, though. He’s focused on the final five or so weeks of the season in Boise and making the necessary adjustments to stay on top of his game and atop the Hawks’ lineup. It’s been a long ride for this amazing young man and it’s not over yet.

“Every situation I’ve been through growing up has made me stronger and a better person,” he said. “It definitely helped me become who I am today. And if it weren’t for my parents, I wouldn’t be where I am today. They helped me grow as a person and pushed me.

“And here I am today playing professional ball and doing something a lot of people would love to do but don’t get the chance to.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 23, 2011, 12:28:58 pm
ArizonaPhil

Reggie Golden was one of about a dozen Cubs minor leaguers who reported early to Spring Training at Fitch Park at the end of February, when ther big leaguers moved up Center Street to HoHoKam Park.

Unfortunately, Golden also reported to Fitch Park bottom-heavy. His upper body was fine, but he had a fat ass and thunder-thighs. Golden was able to play himself into somewhat better shape during the course of Minor League Camp (March) and Extended Spring Training (April-June), but he needs to learn how to stay in better shape during the off-season. I suspect that this year he will spend some of the off-season at "Camp Colvin."

Golden was a BMOC mega-athlete in high school, a star football player (running back) and baseball player. (His cousin Jamal was named the State of Alabama's "Mr Football" last season and will attend Georgia Tech). He was in good shape last year at AZL Cubs and at AZ Instructs, but I think what happened is that 2010 was the first year he did not stay in shape during the off-season by playing football, and he was just not physically active enough during the off-season to avoid gaining weight (below the belt).

Unlike Taiwan Easterling and Matt Szczur (who played college football and college baseball), Golden is not fast. He's not slow, either, but he's just not a fast runner. Even when he's in playing shape, he has just average speed. But he is an aggressive baserunner with the mentality of a football player, and he will try and steal a base if he gets a chance. (He also will sometimes run into an out).

Although nobody in the Cubs organization has more raw HR power than Golden, he also is a very choosy and patient hitter who will take walks (and get called out on strikes). He can be a streaky hitter who can go into deep slumps where he appears totally clueless for days at a time, and then he will catch fire.

Reggie Golden has a plus arm (a true "RF arm"), but he relies too much on his natural talent and instincts. His outfield defense needs work (especially routes on fly balls and line drives).

Overall, I think Reggie Golden is (right now) a Cubs Top 10 Prospect. He's raw, but his HR power & throwing arm are both plus tools that can't be taught. He also appears to be strongly motivated to get better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 23, 2011, 12:58:17 pm
ArizonaPhil

Reggie Golden was one of about a dozen Cubs minor leaguers who reported early to Spring Training at Fitch Park at the end of February, when ther big leaguers moved up Center Street to HoHoKam Park.

Unfortunately, Golden also reported to Fitch Park bottom-heavy. His upper body was fine, but he had a fat ass and thunder-thighs. Golden was able to play himself into somewhat better shape during the course of Minor League Camp (March) and Extended Spring Training (April-June), but he needs to learn how to stay in better shape during the off-season. I suspect that this year he will spend some of the off-season at "Camp Colvin."

Golden was a BMOC mega-athlete in high school, a star football player (running back) and baseball player. (His cousin Jamal was named the State of Alabama's "Mr Football" last season and will attend Georgia Tech). He was in good shape last year at AZL Cubs and at AZ Instructs, but I think what happened is that 2010 was the first year he did not stay in shape during the off-season by playing football, and he was just not physically active enough during the off-season to avoid gaining weight (below the belt).

Unlike Taiwan Easterling and Matt Szczur (who played college football and college baseball), Golden is not fast. He's not slow, either, but he's just not a fast runner. Even when he's in playing shape, he has just average speed. But he is an aggressive baserunner with the mentality of a football player, and he will try and steal a base if he gets a chance. (He also will sometimes run into an out).

Although nobody in the Cubs organization has more raw HR power than Golden, he also is a very choosy and patient hitter who will take walks (and get called out on strikes). He can be a streaky hitter who can go into deep slumps where he appears totally clueless for days at a time, and then he will catch fire.

Reggie Golden has a plus arm (a true "RF arm"), but he relies too much on his natural talent and instincts. His outfield defense needs work (especially routes on fly balls and line drives).

Overall, I think Reggie Golden is (right now) a Cubs Top 10 Prospect. He's raw, but his HR power & throwing arm are both plus tools that can't be taught. He also appears to be strongly motivated to get better.

He sounds somewhat like Soriano in his streakiness, in that he can look lost for days for a time and all of a sudden catch fire.  He, at least, has an excuse for looking lost for a week or two at a time every now and then....he's a year out of high school and it was known he was terribly raw coming out. Hopefully, he will grow out of that.  I'm curious if the streakiness continues once he gets a season or 2 worth of repetitions and begins to master the hitting fundamentals. For some reason, the fact that he is a patient and choosy hitter gives me more hope.  We might finally have a rightfield prospect with power.  And patience.  I just hope he can lay off the slider in the dirt.

It surprises me to read the strongly motivated to get better part at the end after reading Phil talk about how out of shape he was showing up, and how much he struggled.  Glad to see it, though.

Between him and Vogelbach, I think the Cubs have a pair of potentially very good young power hitters. 

The times might be slowly changing from age of the geek, to the age of the cub.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 23, 2011, 01:33:45 pm
The thing with Golden, is it looks like he has an awfully hard time touching the ball.  HR power and throwing arm, yes those are tools that can't be taught. 

But so it whatever it is inside a players read-and-react computer that enables him to hit fast-moving pitches. 

I have a general sense that when a guy has big-time BP power but shows little or no game power, and K's all the time, that it's an indication that he's missing the "hit" tool that can't be taught.  There was a half-week where he seemed to have found it, so perhaps it's not beyond reachable. 

I'm not sure the "exceptionally raw" stuff should apply.  His power made him a recognizable HS star, he played in a baseball state that has long baseball springs, and he was recognized enough to bop around at showcases and All-Star games in WRigley field and the like.  So he's not been so remote that he's been hidden from the best players or some of the best coaches around that all-star show-case types tend to receive.  Not like the pitchers from Fargo,  South AFrica, and Grand Trunk Manitoba.  Obviously he came out as a HS kid, so by definition few HS kids are expected to have big-league polish.  But Fleita wasn't spinning him as a "raw" guy, really, at the Cubs convention he was talking about Golden as being a guy who might start at Peoria. 

So I'm a little nervous that he's just another can-hit-bp-fastballs power hitter who won't hit pro pitching. 

But, he's a couple months from 20 still, so while success looks unlikely it's still too soon to know for sure.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 23, 2011, 01:43:13 pm
DaveP - Thanks for the bits on DeVoss and Golden, particularly the article on DeVoss.  He sounds like a very interesting prospect.  Here's hoping.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2011, 01:49:06 pm
He’s hitting .367 with nine stolen bases and a .472 OBP. While it’s a small sample, one of the biggest numbers that stands out is the zero under the strikeout column in 13 Northwest League at-bats.

DeVoss is showing patience at the plate, another rare quality for many young ballplayers. He played that way at Miami, as well, leading the team with 57 walks while striking out only 30 times in 215 at-bats. He had a .491 OBP and stole 31 bases for the Hurricanes while splitting time between second base and the outfield.



I can't stand it when people take a guy hitting .400 and then talk up his OB% to make the point that he's patient. Of course a .400 hitter is going to have a good OB%. Devoss' walk rate between the two levels he's played is 11%.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 23, 2011, 01:49:47 pm
I just thought I remembered reading he was raw in the scouting reports when the cubs drafted him.  Though I suppose raw could just be a nice way of saying he can't put the bat on the ball.

He played football in high school in addition to baseball, so I could see him being rawer than guys who just concentrated on baseball.  However, it seems like a year of professional baseball should make up for that.  I will say that in Louisiana, as i'm sure it is in Alabama, unless you play at one of the couple of baseball powerhouses in the state, it is football year round.  We eat, breath and live the stuff and playing baseball would be something a football player does in his spare time. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 23, 2011, 02:04:39 pm
He’s hitting .367 with nine stolen bases and a .472 OBP. While it’s a small sample, one of the biggest numbers that stands out is the zero under the strikeout column in 13 Northwest League at-bats.

DeVoss is showing patience at the plate, another rare quality for many young ballplayers. He played that way at Miami, as well, leading the team with 57 walks while striking out only 30 times in 215 at-bats. He had a .491 OBP and stole 31 bases for the Hurricanes while splitting time between second base and the outfield.



I can't stand it when people take a guy hitting .400 and then talk up his OB% to make the point that he's patient. Of course a .400 hitter is going to have a good OB%. Devoss' walk rate between the two levels he's played is 11%.

Heh heh, too true. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2011, 03:02:06 pm
I think (virtually) everyone appreciates it.

Thanks for the kind words, Ron.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 23, 2011, 03:45:49 pm
....Devoss' walk rate between the two levels he's played is 11%.

Obviously that's below average in short-season leagues.  But the sample size is small. 

57 walks to 215 AB this spring in college is an outstanding walk rate even by college standards.  So we know that he has shown the tendency to be highly walk-patient pre-Cub.  Hopefully the Cubs will encourage that and it will remain true. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 23, 2011, 07:12:33 pm
At the Peoria-Bowling Green game tonight. 

A couple of quick impressions.  Easterling doesn't seem like any kind of burner, and he's not a huge physical specimen either. Did seem to barrel a couple of balls decently.

Rubi Silva doesn't look like a million dollar talent either.  Hit an opposite field flare his first AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 23, 2011, 07:19:12 pm
Del Valle is only being clocked at 86-89 to the first three hitters.  This gun had the other pitcher at 91-93. 

He's also run 3 ball counts to the last three hitters.

Finally hit 90 to K the last hitter of the inning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 23, 2011, 07:26:34 pm
Geiger whiffs through a 92 outside fastball and K's on a inside slider in the dirt.

He just made a hell of a play to snag a bad hop to his left to end the 2nd, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 23, 2011, 08:14:35 pm
Second impression of Easterling is a lot better.  Smacked a solid line drive to right center on a 92 mph fastball and didn't think twice about going to second even though the OF got to the ball relatively quickly.  However he just ran into a Theriot type baserunning blunder trying to go to third on a ball hit to the left side.

Silva whiffs on a 94 fastball well outside with a runner at third and one out his second AB.

Geiger whiffs on three pitches, another low breaking ball, his second AB.

My impression of Del Valle haven't changed much since the first.  He probably looks like a LOOGY prospect at best at this point.  Not great velocity and fringy breaking stuff. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 23, 2011, 08:19:36 pm
Thanks for the updates, JR.  I love it. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 23, 2011, 08:33:01 pm
Easterling third AB shows a good eye on a couple of breaking balls but looks ugly swinging through one.  Finally K's looking on a 79 mph loopy curve.

Alcantara is a fairly pint sized looking player.  Works a 5 pitch walk after hitting two weak grounders his first two AB.

Silva a first pitch grounder on an outside pitch ends the 6th.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 23, 2011, 08:48:35 pm
Luis Liria pitches the 6th for Peoria. I don't think he's quite as skinny as his 170 list weight.  He actually looks somewhat filled out.  Fastball is 91-93 this inning.  Haven't seen much breaking stuff.

Geiger is facing an 89 FB, 80 slider RHP and draws a walk in a 6 pitch AB.

Gibbs drives home Geiger on a towering fly to center that the CF can't catch.  He's thrown out trying to stretch it into a triple.  Maybe looks like a switch hitting Girardi?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 23, 2011, 09:01:01 pm
Liria did uncork a 96 FB in the 7th but has mostly stayed in 91-93 range. Is finally throwing some low to mid 80's sliders with pretty good bite to his 5th hitter. Looks like another live armed pitcher the Cubs will stick in relief one day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2011, 09:12:03 pm
Szczur: 1-5, 3B, 2 RBI, E

Antigua: 7-1/3 -6-1-1-0-6

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_23_pbcafa_dbcafa_1


McNutt: 5-6-1-1-0-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_23_cmcaax_tenaax_1


Jackson: 0-4, 2 K, Assist , ( 18 K's in 37 AB's ---92 K's in 283 AB's total )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_23_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2011, 09:31:02 pm
Reggie Golden left tonight's game with an ankle injury after grounding out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 23, 2011, 09:32:00 pm
McNutt's first effective outing since May.  Nice to see. 

Jackson is not looking like too hot a prospect.  Too bad. 

JR, thanks for notes on Liria's stuff. 

it would be nice to have some pitchers who could throw in the 90's and had enough repertoire and poise to start. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2011, 09:43:54 pm
Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_23_peoafx_bgrafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2011, 11:59:07 pm
Smith: 3-1-0-0-0-4

Amaya: 2-5, 3B, 2 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_23_cubrok_brrrok_1


Boise:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_23_yakasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 24, 2011, 12:11:12 am
Jackson is not looking like too hot a prospect.  Too bad.
Jackson is on a 1-24 run with 13 Ks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 24, 2011, 01:40:14 am
I have never really followed walk percentages, but it seems to me that a guy who walks 11% of the time is going to get about 65 walks in a full season.  That is not outstanding, but it sure isn't  a weakness.  I would love it if our 8 position players averaged that.

It is worthless in a guy that hits 250, but a guy that can hit 300 and take 65 walks is going to have a .375 OBA.  I will take that any day.

And no, I am not predicting that DeVoss will hit 300.  I have no idea what he will hit, even if he makes it as far as the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 24, 2011, 01:46:07 am
After a disastrous game, Del Valle comes back with another good game.  5 innings, 4 hits, 1 run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2011, 02:01:31 am
Piece on Yao-Lin Wang:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/07/24/1737208/hawks-young-pitcher-on-the-rise.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 24, 2011, 02:50:37 am
So Wang is just fine for the censor but not D0ng, huh?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 24, 2011, 07:48:39 am
I have never really followed walk percentages, but it seems to me that a guy who walks 11% of the time is going to get about 65 walks in a full season.  That is not outstanding, but it sure isn't  a weakness.  I would love it if our 8 position players averaged that......

11% is a good walk rate in the majors, excellent, significantly above big-league average. 

But 11% is a below-average walk rate in the low minors.  The minor-league walk-rates reflect what we might have anticipated:  Walk rates are the highest/worst in the DSL, and typically get incrementally lower with each league level.  As levels go up, pitchers get better, and walk fewer.  For two reasons, I'm sure:  they simply don't throw as many balls, so it's harder to walk, and as their stuff gets increasingly dangerous, hitters get increasingly wary of two-strike counts whose danger increases with the quality of breaking pitches.   

The following are IsoD's for leagues, that I could find easily, I'm using this year's NL and last year's minor leagues: 
NL:  0.066
AAA:  0.071
AA:  0.075
A:  0.075
Short seasons:  0.078
DSL:  0.099

The change is actually more subtle than I had expected, although the DSL to American minor leagues is really sharp and puts some of our DSL kids into better context. 

Somebody put the Cubs farm team walk rates into league context earlier, and found our teams to be at or near the league bottom in walks at pretty much every level this summer.  i don't know about last place versus 3rd from last place or whatever, but the Cub teams were pretty consistently below average in IsoD last year, I think the exception being PCL. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 24, 2011, 11:47:18 am
Thanks, Craig.

Math is not my strong suit, but if I computed it accurately, if he continues to walk as far above average in the majors as he does in short season ball, he would end up with 55 walks in a 600 plate appearance season, and if he hit 300, his OBA would be .363.

If my math is right, that would be a pretty good season, and if my math is NOT right, we should use it anyway, to make the team look better.

By the way, what is isoD?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 24, 2011, 11:56:43 am
So Dave, what are the odds of a team going an entire season without winning 3 in a row due to chance alone?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 24, 2011, 11:59:39 am
The odds are absolutely zero, as long as Houston is in the League.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on July 24, 2011, 12:16:43 pm
Jordan Lyles will shut them down today. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 24, 2011, 07:16:36 pm
Thanks, Craig.

Math is not my strong suit, but if I computed it accurately, if he continues to walk as far above average in the majors as he does in short season ball, he would end up with 55 walks in a 600 plate appearance season, and if he hit 300, his OBA would be .363.

If my math is right, that would be a pretty good season, and if my math is NOT right, we should use it anyway, to make the team look better.

By the way, what is isoD?

I approve of dave's math, right or not, as it makes a Cubs prospect look good, which is something that doesn't ruin my day.

Thanks, davep!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2011, 07:55:16 pm
Szczur: 1-5, RBI, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_24_pbcafa_dbcafa_1


Geiger: 1-4, 2B, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_24_peoafx_bgrafx_1


Tenn:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_24_cmcaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2011, 07:56:38 pm
DSL all-star game:

Candelario: 0-2, BB, K

Penalver: 1-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_24_dsarok_dsnrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2011, 09:40:41 pm
Jackson: 1-3, HR, RBI, BB, K

Struck: 7 IP, 1 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_24_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 24, 2011, 10:04:28 pm
Hoilman with his 8th home run, a grand slam.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 24, 2011, 10:43:39 pm
Castillo is on another binge. He's gone five games without a K, and with 4 HR and 9 hits. 

15 HR in 52 games at Iowa, that's pretty good, and his walk rate isn't too bad.  .318 average. 

Some pretty good numbers for a catcher.  Hope he's able to extend his binge. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 24, 2011, 10:46:32 pm
Castillo is on another binge. He's gone five games without a K, and with 4 HR and 9 hits. 

15 HR in 52 games at Iowa, that's pretty good, and his walk rate isn't too bad.  .318 average. 

Some pretty good numbers for a catcher.  Hope he's able to extend his binge. 

He's no Koyie Hill.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2011, 11:20:16 pm
Castillo's numbers projected over 600 AB's would give him 46 HR's, 108 RBI, 55 walks and 148 K's.

His BB and K rates are pretty normal for him, but I'm guessing the PCL effect has something to do with the homers....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 24, 2011, 11:39:05 pm
He's no Koyie Hill.

Neither was Koyie Hill, his last year at Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 25, 2011, 12:03:33 am
Hoilman: 1-5, HR, 4 RBI, 2 K, E

Wang: 5-4-2-2-0-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_24_spoasx_boiasx_1


Hernandez: 2-3, 2B, BB

Taylor Davis debut: 1-3, RBI, BB, K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_24_clerok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 12:22:21 am
Who is Tayor Davis?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 25, 2011, 12:35:01 am
Who is Tayor Davis?

UFA out of Moorehead State:

Quote
Davis earned numerous accolades during his Eagle career, including First Team All-Ohio Valley Conference honors this season. He also led the OVC in several offensive categories in 2011 including batting average (.414), hits ((1.53/game), home runs (0.28/game), total bases (2.72/game), on-base percentage (.510) and slugging percentage (.736).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 01:29:19 am
Thanks, Chris.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 25, 2011, 07:02:19 am
Castillo is on another binge. He's gone five games without a K, and with 4 HR and 9 hits. 

15 HR in 52 games at Iowa, that's pretty good, and his walk rate isn't too bad.  .318 average. 

Some pretty good numbers for a catcher.  Hope he's able to extend his binge. 

What are Castillo's defensive skills like?  Does anyone have any information on his ability to call a game and handle a pitching staff, throw, block pitches, etc? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 12:15:33 pm
Extremely strong arm.  Usually quite accurate.  Not very good footwork.  Average at best on blocking balls in the dirt.  No report on calling games.

Scouting notes are at least a year old.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 25, 2011, 12:17:33 pm
I think I've read where his pitch calling was improving but still not all that good.  Also I seem to recall there have been some language barrier issues in communicating with pitchers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 12:39:31 pm
Zambrano and Garza were asked about that, and say there is nothing to it.

Marmol agreed.

Maestri couldn't understand the question.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 25, 2011, 12:42:06 pm
Thanks for the comments.  It will be interesting to see what the Cubs do about their various catchers in the next year or so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 12:43:14 pm
I would like to see them get rid of Hill immediately, and bring up Clevenger.  It would be nice to know if he can handle the backup role.

I would also like to see them work Soto out at first base.  If he can handle it, I wouldn't mind seeing him play first base occasionally, rather than getting as many days off.  This would hardly be revolutionary.  It has been done by many teams in the past.

Let Soto catch 5 games per week, play first base once a week, and sit once a week. Let Castillo catch twice a week to start.

If Castillo shows he is the real thing, while Soto is still catching, the Cubs would have extremely valuable trade bait, if they chose to use it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 01:55:52 pm
ArizonaPhil

There weren't many bright spots for the AZL Cubs tonight, although Marco Hernandez did reach base three times (a single, a double, and a walk), Oliver Zapata (who was yanked out of Friday night's game after dropping a pop fly in the top of the 1st inning) reached base twice on a single and a walk (his AZL-leading 18th walk), and recently-signed 21st round draft pick LHRP Andrew McKirahan (U. of Texas) retired the Indians easily over his two innings of work, six-up and six-down. The 21-year old McKirahan was a lefty reliever for the Texas Longhorns, and pitched in the College World Series last month. No question he is WAY too advanced for the AZL, and in fact I would say he probably could handle a promotion to Peoria right now.


Another recently-signed collegian made his professional-debut in tonight's game, as 21-year old catcher Taylor Davis (2011 NDFA - Morehead State) got the start behind the plate for the AZL Cubs. He went 1-3 with an RBI single and a walk in four Plate Appearances.


Davis was an offensive force at Morehead State this past season (his junior year), putting up a staggering 414/510/736 line (with 13 HR) over 47 games, good for 6th in NCAA D-1 in SLG % (one spot ahead of current Boise 1B Paul Hoilman) and 9th in OBP %. However, Davis has a big leg-kick and an upper-cut swing that might not translate too well to pro ball, his receiving skills are just so-so (at best), and he has a weak & scatter-gun throwing arm. Maybe that's why he was not selected in last month's draft despite the rather gaudy offensive numbers at MSU.


Recently-signed 2011 13th round draft pick OF Trey Martin (Brookwood HS - Snellville, GA) is in uniform but has yet to make his game debut. The 18-year old Martin is a lanky (almost skinny) long-striding outfielder who gave up a chance to play college ball at Kennessaw State when he signed with the Cubs last week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 01:59:12 pm
ArizonaPhil

Trevor Gretzky is presently with the injury rehab group at Fitch Park, as he tries to get his shoulder into playing shape.

Gretzky was a star QB at Oaks Christian HS when he suffered a torn labrum in a game last October, and he is still trying to rehab the injury. He decided against surgery, so he was used as a DH this past season at OCHS before getting drafted and signing with the Cubs.

He may ultimately end up at 1B, but the Cubs would like for him to be able to play a corner OF spot (if possible), too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on July 25, 2011, 01:59:17 pm
Would be nice to see a chart of who has signed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 02:20:14 pm
This is what I have.  I can't guarantee it's total accuracy.  Signed players are in red.

1 - Javier Baez, SS (HS) 18 yrs old R/R

2 - Dan Vogelbach, 1B (HS), 18 yrs old, L/R

3 - Zeke DeVoss, 2B/OF (College-draft eligible Soph), 20 yrs old, B/R

4 - Tony Zych, P (College-JR), 20 yrs old, R/R

5 - Taylor Scott, P (HS), 19 yrs old, R/R

6 - Neftali Rosario, C (Puerto Rico), 17 yrs old, R/R

7 - Trevor Gretzky, 1B (HS), 18 yrs old, L/L

8 - Taylor Dugas, OF (College-JR), 21 yrs old, L/L

9 - Garrett Schlecht, OF (HS), 18 yrs old, L/L

10 - Danny Lockhart, SS (HS), 18 yrs old, L/R

11 - Shawon Dunston Jr., OF (HS), 18 yrs old, L/R

12 - Jacob Lindgren, P (HS), 18 yrs old, L/L

13 - Trey Martin, OF (HS), 18 yrs old, R/R

14 - Dillon Maples, P (HS), 19 yrs old, R/R

15 - Justin Marra, C (HS-Canada), 18 yrs old, L/R

16 - Rafael Lopez, C (College-SR), 23 yrs old, L/R

17 - John Andreoli, OF (College-JR), 21 yrs old, R/R

18 - James Pugliese, P (JUCO-FR), 18 yrs old, R/R

19 - Danny Hoilman, 1B (College-SR), 22 yrs old, R/R

20 - Ben Klafczynski, OF (College-SR), 22 yrs old, L/R

21 - Andrew McKirahan, P (College-JR), 21 yrs old, R/L

22 - Ethan Elias, P (HS), 18 yrs old, R/R

23 - Bradley Zimmer, OF (HS), 18 yrs old, L/R

24 - George Asmus, P (JUCO-SOPH), 20 yrs old, R/R

25 - Rhoderick "Rock" Shoulders, 1B (JUCO-FR), 19 yrs old, L/R

26 - Michael Jensen, P (JUCO-SOPH), 20 yrs old, R/R

27 - Taiwan Easterling, OF (College-SR), 22 yrs old, R/R

28 - Chris Garrison, P (JUCO-SOPH), 21 yrs old, R/R

29 - Drew Weeks, 3B (HS), 17 yrs old, R/R

30 - Alturo Maltos-Garcia, P (JUCO-SOPH), 19 yrs old, R/R

31 - Ronnie Richardson, OF (College-draft eligible SOPH), 21 yrs old, B/R

32 - Pete LeVitt, P (College-SR), 22 yrs old, R/R

33 - Sheldon McDonald, P (College-5th yr SR), 22 yrs old, L/L

34 - Bobby Kelley, OF (JUCO-FR), 19 yrs old, R/R

35 - Ian Dickson, P (College-JR), 20 yrs old, R/R

36 - Trevor Garcia, IF/OF (College-SR), 22 yrs old, R/R

37 - Steven Maxwell, P (College-SR), 23 yrs old, R/R

38 - Casey Lucchese, P (College-SR), 22 yrs old, R/R

39 - Ricky Jacquez, P (HS), 18 yrs old, R/R

40 - PJ Francescon, P (College-SR), 22 yrs old, R/R

41 - Austin Urban, P (JUCO-FR), 18 yrs old, R/R

42 - Brad Zapenas, SS (College-JR), 21 yrs old, R/R

43 - Jeff Calhoun, P/2B (HS), 18 yrs old, R/R

44 - Kenny Socorro, SS (College-SR), 22 yrs old, R/R

45 - Tanner Kichler, P (HS), 18 yrs old, R/R

46 - Scott Weismann, P (College-JR), 21 yrs old, R/R

47 - David Ernst, P (HS), 18 yrs old, R/R

48 - Sam Howard, P (HS), 18 yrs old, R/L

49 - Antonio Gonzales, P (HS), 18 yrs old, L/L

50 - Cody Edwards, P (JUCO-SOPH), 21 yrs old, R/R
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 02:23:12 pm
It looks like they have signed 19 draft choices.  ArizonaPhil has said that they usually sign between 27 and 32 players, including non-drafted free agents.

So far, i believe they have signed at least 3 non-drafted free agents.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 25, 2011, 02:39:28 pm
Dave- The only one that you missed is 46th rounder Scott Weismann, who is on the Arizona League roster but hasn't pitched.  BA also lists him as having signed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 02:52:39 pm
Thanks, Reb.  I will leave it to others to keep it up to date from this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 25, 2011, 03:45:54 pm
So the guys in red are the official busts?

Just trying to keep this straight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 03:56:27 pm
Not until they have actually appeared in one game.

Those signed but have no at bats are likely busts.

Those unsigned are merely potential busts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 25, 2011, 04:03:25 pm
I thought "potential busts" is what Jiggy called jailbait.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 04:34:53 pm
You are thinking of premature busts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 08:11:22 pm
Ceasar with a double and a home run so far today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 25, 2011, 08:16:27 pm
Castillo just left the Iowa game due to some injury.  There was a wild pitch after a strikeout which he slid after and made a wild throw from the ground.  Probably isn't too serious but I might not be surprised if there's some kind if hand or groin injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 25, 2011, 08:23:09 pm
Jay Jackson has turned into a complete batting practice pitcher. Watching him has been really painful.

I mentioned the other night that Easterling didn't look like a big time burner last night. Watching Brett Jackson leg out a single, I think that's the level of speed Easterling has.  Definitely abive average but not quite Campana/Bacon type speed. Actually I think Jackson's and Easterling's builds are pretty similar.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 25, 2011, 09:02:34 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI, BB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_25_dbcafa_sluafa_1

Candelario: 2-5, BB, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_25_dyarok_dchrok_1

Smokies off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 25, 2011, 09:17:05 pm
Jackson might be a touch faster than Easterling.  He's a very fast runner.  Just led off the 8th with a bunt single.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2011, 09:52:13 pm
Hoilman with his 9th home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 25, 2011, 09:58:22 pm
Szczur has his Daytona OBP up over .250.  Small steps. 

I wonder if he didn't project a little better when he tried to be an OBP guy rather than having sold out for power. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 25, 2011, 10:55:03 pm
Jackson: 2-4, SF, RBI, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_25_iowaaa_nasaaa_1


Kirk: 5-1/3 -4-1-1-2-5


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_25_peoafx_bgrafx_1


Boise:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_25_spoasx_boiasx_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 25, 2011, 11:17:12 pm
Szczur has his Daytona OBP up over .250.  Small steps.  I wonder if he didn't project a little better when he tried to be an OBP guy rather than having sold out for power.

.250 is his batting average, not OBP. 

Iso power now at .166, which would be terrific for a leadoff guy. 

This is a work in progress in terms of getting to a good balance of non-Juan Pierre extra-base pop (Keith Law recently compared Szuzur to Pierre) and a a non-Darwin Barney rate of walks.  Hope he can get there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 26, 2011, 01:08:56 am
Keith Law recently compared Szuzur to Pierre

He's been doing that ever since he first saw him.  It's not a recent comment but he sure loves to repeat it.

I think Law is dead wrong when it comes to Szczur but only time will tell.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 26, 2011, 06:52:18 am
.250 is his batting average, not OBP.  ..

Yup, his OBP is .286.  The barney comparison is somewhat appropriate, but as little as Barney walks now and as little as Barney has always walked, his walk rate was never close to as bad as Szczur's has been at Daytona.  And as bad as Szczur's was at Peoria once he'd gotten his first two HR's. 

So perhaps Szczur's upside is to blossom into Barney-level patience?  Who knows. 

Thus far at Daytona, Szczur is a lower OBP guy than Corey Patterson was as a Cub. 

He's got some work to do. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 26, 2011, 08:50:07 am
Yup, his OBP is .286.  The barney comparison is somewhat appropriate, but as little as Barney walks now and as little as Barney has always walked, his walk rate was never close to as bad as Szczur's has been at Daytona.  And as bad as Szczur's was at Peoria once he'd gotten his first two HR's. 

So perhaps Szczur's upside is to blossom into Barney-level patience?  Who knows. 

Thus far at Daytona, Szczur is a lower OBP guy than Corey Patterson was as a Cub. 

He's got some work to do. 

You can tell Craig got up on the wrong side of the bed (or something) when he starts drawing such conclusions from 58 plate appearances (total at Daytona).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 26, 2011, 12:41:47 pm
It is worthless in a guy that hits 250, but a guy that can hit 300 and take 65 walks is going to have a .375 OBA.

Walking 11% of the time is walking 11% of the time, whether you are hitting .150 or .350.  And it is never worthless.  It might not be enough value to make a crappy hitter acceptable or desireable, but it is never worthless.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 26, 2011, 12:43:59 pm
I think I've read where his pitch calling was improving but still not all that good.  Also I seem to recall there have been some language barrier issues in communicating with pitchers.

So call the game from the dugout.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 03:33:28 pm
I think Craig is making a valid point.  From what we have seen of his first 60 at bats at Daytona, it would probably not be a good idea to call up Ceasar right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 26, 2011, 03:37:13 pm
Who comes to praise Caesar, not to bury him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 03:39:22 pm
Certainly not the friends, Romans and Countrymen.

Or, for that matter, Mark Antony.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 26, 2011, 03:44:33 pm
Seth from Hard Core Pawn has huge ears that he could lend to somebody.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 26, 2011, 04:20:47 pm
I just watched the Emperor's Club again.  A fine movie.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 26, 2011, 04:55:32 pm
I just watched the Emperor's Club again.  A fine movie.

Coming from Playtwo, this is obviously some sort of pun.  But damned if I can figure it out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 26, 2011, 05:05:11 pm
No pun.  The discussion of Caesar brought it to mind.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 26, 2011, 05:29:24 pm
36th round pick Travis Garcia has retired.  He batted .233 in 14 games as a pro. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 05:32:06 pm
Dang.  He and Baez were the core of the draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 26, 2011, 06:44:51 pm
Obviously Garcia attended Craig's school of sample size...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 26, 2011, 08:24:53 pm
Heh heh.  Honestly, I was just excited yesterday when Szczur bumped up over the .250 OBP line at Daytona, and then you guys are jumping all over me! After his 2-3 tonight, he's up over .300 OBP at Daytona, and his season OBP is over .350. 

he got two doubles tonight, threw a guy out at the plate, then made a throwing error, and got replaced by a pinch hitter the next inning in the 6th inning of an 8-4 game.  I usually assume when a minor-leaguer gets removed mid-game, when it's not a total blowout, that it's either injury or some kind of disciplinary thing.  I wonder what the scoop is in this case?  I hope it's a teaching lesson on throwing to the wrong base, rather than a torn rotator cuff or something. 

I admit I am concerned about his walk rate, though.  Sure, 63 AB at Daytona is small, but he'd been about 3 walks in his previous 80 AB or so at Peoria I think.  140 AB may be a smallish sample, but it's not all that small is it?  It's a third of his pro career, and given the encouragements Fleita gives, the most recent third might be the most predictive. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 26, 2011, 10:20:48 pm
Quote
More from Shawon Dunston Jr.:

Quote:
people stop assuming things, Im here at vandy right now in summer school and have Not signed with the cubs, i make my final decision right at august 15 so please stop running your mouth that you have inside information thank you


Quote
More from (https://twitter.com/#!/jacquez_ricky)Ricky Jacquez[/url][/u][/color]:



Quote:
[/font]
Hope something can get done with the cubs if not off to UT!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 26, 2011, 10:33:24 pm
I would love to sign Shawon Jr.

I would REALLY love to sign Jacquez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2011, 10:58:05 pm
Szczur: 2-3, 2 2B, RBI, E, Assist


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_26_dbcafa_sluafa_1


Flaherty: 0-4, 2 K ,  ( 9-45 w/  2 BB - 14 K's  at Iowa )

Coleman: 7-6-1-1-0-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_26_iowaaa_nozaaa_1


Peoria off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2011, 11:02:16 pm
Lopez: 3-3, 2B, HR, 4 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_26_spoasx_boiasx_1

Hernandez: 2-4, RBI, BB, SB

Amaya: 2-4, RBI, SB, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_26_cubrok_rngrok_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2011, 11:05:51 pm
Vitters: 2-5, HR, 2 RBI, K, CS


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_26_tenaax_monaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 27, 2011, 10:57:35 am
Szczur has his Daytona OBP up over .250.  Small steps.   I wonder if he didn't project a little better when he tried to be an OBP guy rather than having sold out for power.

It is always hard to tell to what degree a minor league player's performance is resulting from specific directions from Cub management, whether the manager of the team he is with or directly from Flieta, or from Flieta thru the manager.  And that is  a bit frightening, considering the unimpressive record Flieta has to date with position prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 27, 2011, 11:38:23 am
Does anyone have a list of the totally home grown players from the Cub organization who have made it to the MLs over the past 20 years, and how the number and impact of such players compares with home grown players from other ML organizations?
I'm disappointed that no one has addressed this question of mine, posted a while ago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2011, 01:35:05 pm
The one thing I can't stand is procrastination.  Tomorrow, I am going to do something about it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 27, 2011, 03:18:09 pm
Anyone who only procrastinates only one day is a piker.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2011, 03:50:58 pm
I wanted to procrastinate for more than that, but I never got around to it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 27, 2011, 04:33:39 pm
From his chat today, Jim Callis on Flaherty, B. Jackson, and Vitters:

Ray (Chicago): Has Ryan Flaherty's upside improved enough to be projected as a legit offensive third baseman? And including Flaherty, what is the best option at second base for the Cubs in 2012?

Jim Callis: If he can play there, which is still a question. He has played all over the place for the Cubs in the minors, in part because they have several infielders like. But he would have been better served not wasting time at second base or shortstop, where he's not going to play for any length of time in the big leagues, and spending a lot more time at third base. I don't think Darwin Barney will be a star, but he's their best option at second base for 2012.

Tim (Chicago): It seems that Brett Jackson has had an up and down season..any reason for concern?

Jim Callis: No. He had a minor injury that slowed him after a good start. He's still the same solid-across-the-board prospect.

Tex (Austin,Tx): Future 3rd baseman of the Cubs???? Josh Vitters, DJ LeMahieu, Ryan Flaherty or other?

Jim Callis: I still think Vitters is the best in-house option, but I keep waiting for this breakout year that's supposed to be coming. Their long-term third baseman may not be in the organization right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 05:00:46 pm
Jackson's minor injury was 2-1/2 months ago. How long does that excuse fly for his struggles at the plate?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2011, 05:07:15 pm
Until it heals?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 05:16:24 pm
Why assume it hasn't?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2011, 05:41:31 pm
Why assume that it has?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 05:45:47 pm
Because it was a minor injury that occurred nearly 3 months ago.

Because Jackson went on the DL for 15 days to let it heal.

Because there has been no mention of it being an issue since.

Because the Cubs likely wouldn't promote him to AAA with a lingering injury.

So again, why assume it's still a problem?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 06:12:18 pm
Zapata: 1-2, RBI, SB, 3 BB, K

Amaya: 2-4, RBI

Simpson: 1-1/3 -3-2-2-0-1

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_27_athrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2011, 06:20:45 pm
All we know is that Jackson is not performing as well as we like.  The explanations all require assumptions rather than facts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 06:30:33 pm
Well, until he or someone from Iowa or Tennessee says he's still being affected by an injury, I have to assume he isn't. And if he is over 2 months later, then they need to do something about it. Because right now he is laying an egg in a league where everyone hits.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2011, 07:02:22 pm
It took Lee over a year to recover from an injury.  And no one admitted that he was hurt.

You may be right.  We just have no way of knowing at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 07:10:42 pm
Dave, Lee broke his wrist, had surgery, then came back 2 months later. It's not surprising at all that he needed months to fully recover.

Jackson didn't break anything or have surgery.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 08:14:47 pm
No Szczur in the lineup; still no word on what's wrong with him.

Rhee: 5-2/3 -9-6-5-1-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_27_dbcafa_sluafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 27, 2011, 08:19:51 pm
Michael Burgess with a 297-388-508 line since the break in 135 plate appearances.  Starting to show something, maybe?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 27, 2011, 08:22:23 pm
He's been traded!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2011, 08:24:57 pm
The Cards got Corey.  And the Cubs are about to play the Cards.

What is likely to happen?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 27, 2011, 08:41:32 pm
LOL  you have to ask?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 08:59:16 pm
Penalver: 1-3, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, K, 3 SB


Candelario: 0-2, 2 BB, K, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_27_dtirok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 27, 2011, 09:34:55 pm
The DSL starter in that game has a 1.65 ERA, with a 37K/4BB/27IP ratio.  8K/0BB/4IP today.  Earlier he had a 10K/0BB/5IP outing. 

Some funny usage in between, though, a couple of 2-inning starts and last start was a 0.1 inning outing. 

He's 20, so nothing young and thrilling there. 

But he lists as 6'5" 220.  That's a big dog.  Big guys who show 37K/4BB splits at any level catch my interest. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 09:43:58 pm
Geiger: 2-4, 2B, E

Peralta: 4-5-4-4-5-1 , (16 ER's last 11 IP)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_27_peoafx_qcsafx_1


Smokies shut out by Archer despite 4 walks and 2 hit batsmen:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_27_tenaax_monaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 27, 2011, 09:55:22 pm
Quote
He's 20, so nothing young and thrilling there. 

Words fail me...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2011, 11:14:16 pm
Jackson: 1-5, 2 K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_27_iowaaa_nozaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2011, 12:01:08 am
Hoilman: 3-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, 2 K

Cruz: 4-2/3 IP, 4 BB, 7 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_27_boiasx_eveasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 28, 2011, 12:09:46 am
Matt Szczur has a dislocated pinky and is day-to-day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 28, 2011, 03:49:47 am
Hoilman has some interesting statistics. He leads the league in strikeouts, but he's tied for the league lead in home runs, second in runs batted in, third in walks and slugging percentage, and fourth in the league in OPS, despite his .265 batting average. Ten of his 18 extra-base hits are home runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 28, 2011, 09:32:39 am
He's a beast.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 28, 2011, 10:09:11 am
I'd love to have a Hoilman-style hitter in Wrigley Field.  And if I knew he could hit that many HR's and take that many walks to balance the K's, it would be much more than enough to justify the K's. 

He'll probably need to prove himself at each step, though.  That many K's might reflect some holes, or some serious guess-hitting, or some serious cripple-pitch/mistake-pitch hitting.  Fewer mistake-pitches at higher levels, and harder to guess on guys with more complete repertoires.  So it seems almost inconceivable that he'd be able to carry his current profile up the ladder.  But, hitters can get smarter and better too, and he's supposed to be quite an intelligent guy.  Perhaps he'll be able to improve as much or more than the pitchers do.  Will be interesting to see how far he can go. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 28, 2011, 10:21:13 am
Hoilman has the potential to be Rob Deer, with high home runs and low BA.  (I don't know how Deer did no walks).

But that potential is a very long shot.  If his strike out rate is this low in short season ball, it is likely to get worse as he moves up and sees more breaking balls.

But at least the potential is there.  Much better if there is no potential at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 28, 2011, 11:45:39 am
Heh, hard to have the K-rate get worse when it's already in the 40-50% range.  If he's still struggling to keep it below 50%, I think he'll retire soon enough and go to med school or whatever. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on July 28, 2011, 01:38:12 pm
I really don't think the Brett Jackson injury is the reason for his current performance-probably him just playing down to the competition, huh Chris?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on July 28, 2011, 03:14:40 pm
Jackson's "injury" was a minor thumb sprain from sliding into 2nd and grabbing the base on an overslide. I've said it time and time again this year, I have been unimpressed with his performance and lack of effort. The bump to AAA made no sense to me but whatever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 28, 2011, 03:19:23 pm
Quote from: Arizona Phil on Hayden Simpson's recent Mesa outing
Cubs 2010 #1 draft pick RHP Hayden Simpson followed Garcia to the mound, entering the game at the start of the 6th inning. Throwing nothing but fastballs (as was also the case in his previous outing), Simpson had an easy nine-pitch 6th (striking out the lead-off hitter looking), before allowing a lead-off single and a one-out Miguel Marte RBI double high off the CF "Green Monster" (Batter's Eye), just two pitches after Marte slugged a near-HR down the LF line (hooked foul at the last second before clearing the fence). Simpson was then removed from the game, after having thrown 26 pitches (17 strikes).

While he throws only fastballs in games, Simpson does throw a breaking ball and a change-up when warming-up. But he apparently is so messed up right now, the Cubs feel he needs to go back to square one and just try and command his fastball (which he was able to do today, and with perhaps a bit more velocity than he has shown previously), before adding anything else to his in-game regimen.

You can tell somebody of concern is in the game when the Fitch Park Sports Psychologist is sitting on the bench, and a Special Assignment Scout is running the radar gun from the tower (hiding the readings from the players).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 28, 2011, 03:40:55 pm
Well done Tim Wilken.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 28, 2011, 03:54:54 pm
The Cubs have signed another Cuban defector, RHP Yoanner Negrin.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/minor-league-transactions-july-21-26/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 28, 2011, 04:45:09 pm
Quote from: Iowa Cubs

The Cubs placed C Welington Castillo on the disabled list today with a strained right hamstring and sent him to the team's complex in Arizona for rehab. The PCL All-Star is batting .315 with a career-high 15 homers and 35 RBI in 53 games with Iowa. C Steve Clevenger returns to the I-Cubs today from double-A Tennessee. The Southern League All-Star batted .278 with four homers and 29 RBI in 74 games with the Smokies. Earlier this year, he hit .412 with three homers and eight RBI in 14 games with Iowa from May 12-29.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2011, 06:31:00 pm
I really don't think the Brett Jackson injury is the reason for his current performance-probably him just playing down to the competition, huh Chris?


If I knew what that meant, I'd come up with an answer for you, jacey.




Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2011, 06:39:19 pm
Hernandez: 3-4, 3B, SF, 4 RBI

Amaya: 3-5, 3B, 3 RBI, E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_28_diarok_cubrok_1


Candelario: 2-4, BB, K

Penalver: 3-3, 2 BB, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_28_dchrok_dwarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2011, 08:07:40 pm
Antigua: 7-7-3-3-0-8 ,  ( 14 K, 0 BB last 2 starts ; 39-1/3 IP, 7 BB, 40 K's since the break )

Szczur: DNP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_28_dbcafa_sluafa_1


Iowa rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2011, 09:56:52 pm
McNutt: 4-7-5-5-3-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_28_tenaax_monaax_1

Chiefs:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_28_peoafx_qcsafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 28, 2011, 11:50:44 pm
The Cubs have signed another Cuban defector, RHP Yoanner Negrin.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2011/07/minor-league-transactions-july-21-26/

It isn't attracting much notice, but after a terrible start, Raphael Valdez is starting to get his numbers to more respectable levels.

And Dub Kim has really made a comeback, after being below 200 much of the season, he has brought his average almost to 300 lately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2011, 12:03:12 am
And Dub Kim has really made a comeback

He has 2 walks in 85 at-bats.

I'm pretty sure even you or Curt could go to the plate with a bat and beat that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2011, 12:05:00 am
Golden's return not golden: 0-5, 3 K, Assist

Wells: 5-1/3 -5-3-3-1-6


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_28_boiasx_eveasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2011, 01:24:23 am
But I doubt I could hit 295 in professional ball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2011, 11:39:27 am
ArizonaPhil

Dong-Yub Kim runs OK for a big guy, and he is VERY aggressive on the bases. He is a good hitter with plus-power (hasn't shown up in games yet, though). His defense in LF needs a LOT of work.

LHP Brian Smith (Cubs 2010 40th round draft pick - Canadian Junior National Team) labored today (3.0 IP - 57 pitches, including a 20-pitch 1st inning and a 21-pitch 2nd). He allowed two runs on five hits (although four of the five hits came with two outs), with two walks and a strikeout. He wasn't able to induce any ground balls, either.

But Smith has some promise. He looks a LOT better now than he did at AZ Instructs last October, that's for sure. He throws a fastball in the upper 80's with a good breaking ball and a decent off-speed pitch. He's only 18, so he has plenty of time to grow and develop.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2011, 11:45:16 am
ArizonaPhil

Since being moved to the bullpen last month, RHP Hung Wen Chen has gone:

0.98 ERA
0.92 WHIP
18.1 IP, 16 H, 2 R (2 ER), 1 BB, 28 K, 8/8 SV

for Campeche (Mexican League)

BTW, Chen is still property of the Cubs (he was loaned to Campeche), and cannot be a minor league FA until post-2013, so an NRI to Spring Training 2012 might not be out of the question.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2011, 12:17:40 pm
DeVoss hasn't played in about a week.  I assume he is hurt.  Anyone know what the situation is?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2011, 04:05:53 pm
The Mesa Cubs have scored 19 runs today.

But the game isn't over yet, so they may still get their first home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 29, 2011, 04:36:34 pm
Over his last 8 games, DY Kim has  5K/2BB in 34 AB, along with 15 hits. 

During his previous 14 games, he'd had 17K/0BB in 57(?) AB. 

Pretty much singles-hitting, though.  Twelve of those recent 15 hits are singles, with three doubles. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2011, 05:06:36 pm
The Mesa Cubs didn't get their home run in the ninth, but they did manage 5 more runs, for a total of 24 for the day.

Taylor Davis is certainly off to a good start with the bat, at least.

I think that Mesa is a good indication of the Cubs change in stress from offense to pitching in the past couple of years.  It wasn't too long ago that 250 would have been one of the better batting average for Mesa.  Now, most everyone is over three hundred.  And they haven't yet had the influx of overslot players hit the team yet.

On the other hand, Mesa certainly doesn't seem to have an overabundance of top pitching prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2011, 05:08:10 pm
Davis: 4-5, 2B, 2 RBI, BB

Amaya: 2-7, 2 RBI, 2 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_29_cubrok_cinrok_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2011, 09:07:13 pm
Crawford: 2-4, 3 SB

Bour: 1-3, RBI, K , ( .688 OPS since start of June )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_29_jupafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2011, 09:54:07 pm
Vitters: 3-4, HR, RBI, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_29_tenaax_monaax_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_29_peoafx_qcsafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2011, 10:53:27 pm
Rusin: 5-2/3 -3-1-1-2-5 ,  ( 12/3 K-BB ratio at Iowa )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_29_iowaaa_nozaaa_1


Jackson: 3-4, 2B, HR, 2 RBI

Flaherty: 0-2, BB, K , ( 10-52, 16 K's at Iowa )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_29_iowaaa_nozaaa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2011, 11:15:12 pm
Golden: 0-3, 3 K, 2 Assists , ( 5-34, 17 K's over last 11 games )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_29_boiasx_eveasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 30, 2011, 12:25:10 pm
Friday night was Starlin Castro Bobblehead Night in Daytona.  D-Cubs SS Rafael Valdes made three errors.   There has to be some symbolism there.  3B Greg Rohan made two errors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 30, 2011, 01:11:05 pm
So Vitters will soon have his own bobblehead day in Daytona?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 30, 2011, 01:14:00 pm
22-year-old Alberto Cabrera has been something of a forgotten man, given his horrible results this year.  7.0 ERA pre-All-star. 

He's made some anti-awful improvements over the last month.  Of his last four starts, two have been no runs, and one two runs.  3.05 in July.  (Although his splits remain poor).

Yesterday he got taken out after 4 innings and 50-some pitches with a 3-0 lead. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 30, 2011, 07:56:36 pm
Brett Jackson just went yard in Memphis...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 30, 2011, 09:19:23 pm
Szczur pinch-ran.

Kurcz: 1-1/3 IP, 3 K , ( 33 K in 22-1/3 IP in relief )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_30_jupafa_dbcafa_1


Jackson: 1-3, HR, RBI, BB, K

Carpenter: 1-1/3 -3-3-3-2-1

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_30_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1

Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_30_peoafx_cliafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 30, 2011, 10:33:29 pm
Smokies:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_30_tenaax_monaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2011, 12:07:03 am
Golden: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI

Greathouse: 3-1/3 IP, 5 BB, 6 K , ( 19 IP, 22 BB, 25 K )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_30_boiasx_eveasx_1



Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 31, 2011, 12:13:03 am
Just like that, B. Jackson is OPSing .838 at Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 31, 2011, 09:43:23 am
Just like that, B. Jackson is OPSing .838 at Iowa.

It would certainly be some welcome news if Jackson caught fire and stayed hot. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 31, 2011, 10:03:00 am
Brad Snyder almost ended Jackson's season last night on a ball hit into the RCF gap...they did make contact, but it could have been much worse...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 31, 2011, 10:07:15 am
Jackson also showed a strong arm, making a bullet throw to home on a sac fly to straightaway CF. Memphis had speed on 3B, but the throw clearly beat him. The call, however, was reminiscent of the Braves/Pirates call the other night.

Clevenger was highly pissed, and the manager got tossed. He pretty much had to, as bad as the call was...

Clevenger looked really good at the plate, with 2 doubles.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 31, 2011, 11:40:45 am
Release Hill today and bring up Clevenger.  Play Soto at first at least once a week.  Lets try to see what our options are.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 31, 2011, 01:59:38 pm
Release Hill today and bring up Clevenger.

But Koyiey might help the team going forward, davie-poo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 31, 2011, 02:07:38 pm
He hasn't up til now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 31, 2011, 02:20:22 pm
That hasn't stopped Hendry from holding onto everyone else except the guy responsible for 19% of the Cubs walks.  It also didn't stop him from bringing Hill back after last season.  What makes you think he would cut him now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2011, 07:26:38 pm
Szczur: 0-4, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_31_jupafa_dbcafa_1


Kirk: 6-2-0-0-0-4

Geiger: 0-5, K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_31_peoafx_cliafx_1


Tenn:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_31_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2011, 07:28:29 pm
Rosario: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_31_royrok_cubrok_1


Kim: 2-4-4-4-0-3

Golden: 0-4, K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_31_boiasx_eveasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 31, 2011, 08:06:33 pm
Did the Cubs promote Szczur before he was ready? 

His BA is actually at .254, OBP at .286, OPS at .719, after an OPS of .796.  10 Ks in 67 AB.

Though he is no longer putting up truly great numbers as he was in Peoria, if he improves somewhat in August, it would make a promotion to AA logical for next year, but in seeing how he does each day it just seems like a lot of air has left his balloon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2011, 10:02:28 pm
Jackson: 0-2, 2 BB, K, Assist

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_31_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 01, 2011, 08:50:11 am
Abner Abreu walked twice in four plate appearances for Daytona.  That can't be allowed.  Send him back to Cleveland.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 01, 2011, 08:59:58 am
Something encouraging re Clevenger from Bruce Miles:

Cubs people feel he's moving as fast, if not faster, than Castillo. Great strides on defense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 01, 2011, 09:14:13 am
LOL!  At this rate, he might get a cup of coffee before he's 30!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2011, 10:00:35 am
Clevenger's like the mirror image of Ryan Flaherty:

Doesn't hit in AA but tears up the PCL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 01, 2011, 11:55:05 am
Clevenger's like the mirror image of Ryan Flaherty:  Doesn't hit in AA but tears up the PCL.

Clevenger had 756   AA plate appearances, and hit .299, with 11 HR, 65 BB and 74 Ks, and OBP of .360 and and OPS of .806, in a league where the top team OPS is .776.

I wish all of our guys who were not hitting were doing so poorly.
Title: International prospects in Arizona?
Post by: dallen7908 on August 01, 2011, 12:10:32 pm

Inernational prospects in Arizona?

The Cubs have three 18 year olds hitting over 0.300 at Mesa this year.   One of them (OF Oliver Zapata) is a speedy walk-machine.  The others are infielders Gioskar Amaya and Marco Hernandez.  None have shown any power yet.

A 4th 18 yr old, catcher Neftali Rosario, only has a few at bats, but is crushing the ball.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 01, 2011, 02:03:30 pm
They haven't all stayed there, but there have been quite a few international prospects in Mesa this year.

Amaya, Hernandez, Valdez, Bieneme, Zapata, Na, Gregori Gonzalez, Kem, Eduardo Gonzelez, Morelli, Capazas, Garcia, Jimenez Del Valle, among others all played for Mesa this season.

And the two DR teams have more interesting prospects this year than I have ever seen there.

And in my opinion, a speedy walk machine is one of the things that the Cubs could really use.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2011, 07:16:43 pm
Quote
Clevenger had 756   AA plate appearances, and hit .299, with 11 HR, 65 BB and 74 Ks, and OBP of .360 and and OPS of .806, in a league where the top team OPS is .776.

I wish all of our guys who were not hitting were doing so poorly.


First of all, you lumped all 4 of Clevenger's seasons in AA together. I would certainly hope that by his 4th go-around in the league he could produce, but I was talking about this season in which he had a great April and then did little of anything.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2011, 07:22:40 pm
Amaya: 2-3, 3B, 2 RBI, SB, CS, BB, K

Simpson: 4-3-1-1-3-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_01_cubrok_clerok_1


Boise off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2011, 09:08:01 pm
Vitters: 2-4, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_01_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2011, 09:12:53 pm
Szczur: 2-5, 3B, SB, K

Abreu: 2-4, 2B, 2 K

Rhee: 6 IP, 3 R, 2 HR


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_01_jupafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 01, 2011, 10:11:24 pm

First of all, you lumped all 4 of Clevenger's seasons in AA together. I would certainly hope that by his 4th go-around in the league he could produce, but I was talking about this season in which he had a great April and then did little of anything.

Well, is the problem that I "lumped all 4 of" his seasons in AA together, which I did, and which I did because your comment was "Doesn't hit in AA," not "didn't hit this year", or "didn't hit this year (except when you look at the full year instead of just two months of it)."  As to your "hope that by his 4th go-around in the league he could produce," it sounds as if you might be thinking that looking at his overall stats might be more meaningful of how he did in the league.... except the overall stats don't support your original position that he "Doesn't hit in AA."  Unfortunately, even just this year, his AA numbers were .278/.343/.775, which I suspect would make lots of fans happy if they got that performance from the players who were not hitting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2011, 10:38:57 pm
Clevenger's AA stats post-April this year were extremely poor.

And I was talking about this season. Perhaps I should've specified, but I doubt anyone other than you would've put 4 stints in AA together to try and make a point that he's hit in that league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2011, 10:39:21 pm
Jackson: 1-4, RBI, SB, BB, 2 K

Lemahieu: 0-5 , ( 7 for last 41 w/ .400 OPS )

Coleman: 6-4-2-2-1-8 , ( 21 K's, 3 BB last 4 outings )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_01_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1

Geiger: 2-4, 2B, BB, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_01_peoafx_cliafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 02, 2011, 12:13:07 am
At 47-63, Iowa has the worst record in the PCL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2011, 12:41:12 am
A positive/negative note from Sunday's action:

Quote
The Cubs' Matt Szczur made yet another amazing catch in center field.

In the fourth inning, running to his right and on a full sprint, Szczur completely laid out in the air to make a diving catch. Szczur is starting to make a habit out of catches like that. He has absolutely no regard for his impending face-plant landings.

Bailey said Szczur actually misjudged the ball at first, which forced him to make the diving play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 02, 2011, 12:47:11 am
The good news is that he has the athleticism and speed to make up for the times when he gets a bad read off the bat.

I hope it was a night game and poor lighting had something to do with Szczur misjudging it initially.

[/rationalization]
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2011, 03:18:25 am
Sanchez: 2-3, 3B, 2 RBI, BB

Ortega: 0-1, K  , ( 13-44, 9 BB, 10 K, 11-13 SB between DSL teams; just turned 17 )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_01_dcurok_dorrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 02, 2011, 07:51:49 am
Jackson turns 23 today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 02, 2011, 11:03:14 am
Quote
The way Hendry put it, the rate of return the Cubs would get on a player like Carlos Pena wasn’t enough to make a trade attractive and that Pena is a possibility for next year.
 
“There’s not somebody waiting to take his place for next year in-house like Tyler is hopeful to do that in the outfield in moving Fuke,” Hendry said. You have to look at it that way, too.

I think this pretty much tells you how little regard the Cubs have for Bryan LaHair.  LaHair is probably having one of the biggest seasons of anyone in the minors, and we apparently don't care one bit about it.

Not that we're the only organization which doesn't much put stock in what a 28 year old Triple-A veteran does, but I'm not sure why players like LaHair would even consider signing with the Cubs organization. 

I think it's interesting how an organization like the Rays will take a chance on Carlos Pena or the Rangers take a chance on Marlon Byrd or Mark DeRosa when they are branded AAAA players, and then it's us who wind up paying big money for them when they become free agents after proving they're better than that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 02, 2011, 11:18:38 am
JR - Bruce Miles addressed the LaHair situation, noting that he became a minor league free agent and ended up coming back to the Cubs because he couldn't do better (or as well?) elsewhere.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2011, 11:32:21 am
Sounds reasonable.  But if there are no circumstances where they would promote him, why sign him in the first place.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 02, 2011, 11:34:33 am
Sounds reasonable.  But if there are no circumstances where they would promote him, why sign him in the first place.
If the Iowa Cubs are not competitive, fans will not show up at their games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 02, 2011, 11:35:36 am
Here are the quotes from Bruce Miles, in response to comments by others.

LaHair will be 29 in the fall. He got no serious offers last winter and came back to the Cubs on a minor-league contract. Analogous to Micah Hoffpauir.
...
In trying to be fair -- and I get all the anger and all that -- but the Cubs have a pretty good reputation with minor league free agents. That's why they sign back here for more than one year, which is usually not the case in baseball. I've talked to many, and they say that Hendry and Fleita shoot straight with them and make no promises. What an older guy like LaHair ought to do is parlay his success in AAA for a deal in Japan like Hoffpauir did.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 02, 2011, 11:47:38 am
Clevenger's AA stats post-April this year were extremely poor.

And I was talking about this season. Perhaps I should've specified, but I doubt anyone other than you would've put 4 stints in AA together to try and make a point that he's hit in that league.

Forgive me for thinking you actually meant what you wrote instead of divining what you intended.  Your post also ignored the fact that in May Clevenger spent 14 games in AAA at Iowa and had a batting line at that time of .412/.464/.647/1.111.  Not terrible numbers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2011, 07:15:39 pm
Brett Jackson leads off the game with a home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2011, 08:37:57 pm
Your post also ignored the fact that in May Clevenger spent 14 games in AAA at Iowa and had a batting line at that time of .412/.464/.647/1.111.  Not terrible numbers.


The point of my post was that Clevenger didn't do much in Knoxville but has hit in Iowa, in contrast to Flaherty. Considering that, any notion I ignored what he's done in Iowa seems.....absurd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2011, 08:51:46 pm
Hernandez: 2-5, HR, RBI, 2 K, E

Zapata: 2-5, 3B

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_02_angrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2011, 09:44:21 pm
Vitters: 0-2, SF, RBI, 2 BB

Ha: 3-4, 2B, SF, 3 RBI

McNutt: 6-9-3-3-0-5


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_02_biraax_tenaax_1


Jackson: 2-4, HR, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_02_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 02, 2011, 10:03:08 pm
Here are the quotes from Bruce Miles, in response to comments by others.

LaHair will be 29 in the fall. He got no serious offers last winter and came back to the Cubs on a minor-league contract. Analogous to Micah Hoffpauir.
...
In trying to be fair -- and I get all the anger and all that -- but the Cubs have a pretty good reputation with minor league free agents. That's why they sign back here for more than one year, which is usually not the case in baseball. I've talked to many, and they say that Hendry and Fleita shoot straight with them and make no promises. What an older guy like LaHair ought to do is parlay his success in AAA for a deal in Japan like Hoffpauir did.

Thanks Ron.  I think Bruce is right that the best LaHair can probably hope for at this point is a good offer from Japan.  I still think it's too bad the Cubs don't seem to be interested in giving a guy like this a look, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2011, 10:49:49 pm
Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_02_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2011, 10:56:31 pm
Golden: 1-4, 3-run 2B

Cruz: 5 IP, 1 ER


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_02_skvasx_boiasx_1


Candelario: 2-3, 2B, RBI, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_02_dchrok_dblrok_1


Ortega: 2-3, 2B, BB, PO

Sanchez: 1-2, 2B, RBI, 2 E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_02_dparok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2011, 04:14:22 pm
Mesa is killing their opposition today, 9 - 0.  Trey Martin, the 18 year old CF they signed last week has two triples.

I assume that there is an error in the box score that says that D 0ng Yub Kim is pitching today.  If it is him, he is doing all right so far.  3.1 innnigs, 5 hits, but no runs, no walks and one strike out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2011, 04:31:00 pm
It sounds like J Kim has been demoted to Arizona.  If so, not too surprising.  He has not been tearing up Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 03, 2011, 05:28:03 pm
Chiefs Roster Moves:IF Elliot Soto to Daytona,RHP Robinson Lopez to DL.Add OF Jesus Morelli(Boise)& RHP Ramon Garcia (Mesa)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2011, 06:44:08 pm
Hernandez: 2-4, 2B, 3B, SF, 4 RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_03_cubrok_diarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 03, 2011, 06:50:23 pm
Matt Camp has been suspended again.  As before, no reason was given.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 03, 2011, 07:29:24 pm
He must be another of those prospects Hendry didn't want to demote or eliminate at the trading deadline.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2011, 07:51:23 pm
What makes you think so?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2011, 09:21:45 pm
Antigua: 6-6-3-3-1-6 ; ( 20 K's, 1 BB last 3 starts )

Abreu: 2-4, K, Assist (home)

Szczur: 2-4, SB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_03_lakafa_dbcafa_1


Ha: 2-3, 2B, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_03_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2011, 09:32:06 pm
Hoilman takes the league lead in homers with his 11th for Boise.  Wells with no earned runs in 5 innings so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2011, 10:04:31 pm
Two hitless innings for Burke tonight, with four strikeouts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2011, 10:37:06 pm
Oliver Zapata was promoted to Boise.

Don't supposed Hernandez or Amaya will get the same treatment.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2011, 10:47:19 pm
Jackson: 2-3, 2 BB, Assist

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_03_freaaa_iowaaa_1


Zapata: 1-2, BB, K, CS

Hoilman: 1-2, HR, 2 RBI, 2 BB, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_03_skvasx_boiasx_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_03_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2011, 01:33:03 am
Jackson's OPS over .900 at Iowa.  You wouldn't have guessed that based on how often we've been told he was struggling badly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2011, 01:47:04 am
4 homers and 8 walks in 10 games will do that.

Perhaps he's adjusted. The 38% K-rate is still frightening, however.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2011, 01:51:47 am
Piece on Paul Hoilman:

http://www.idahopress.com/sports/hawks-heavy-hitter/article_4a9f0840-bd9c-11e0-a33d-001cc4c03286.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 04, 2011, 05:31:34 am
4 homers and 8 walks in 10 games will do that.

Perhaps he's adjusted. The 38% K-rate is still frightening, however.


.  I don't care how he makes his outs so long as he is OPSing in the upper 800's
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2011, 05:41:10 am
About the only player in the majors who has survived with that kind of K-rate is Mark Reynolds.

Adam Dunn was more than fine at 33%, but he's obviously a massive power guy when he's going good. This year's he's at 43% and he's been horrible.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 04, 2011, 07:07:38 am
I think the best analog for what jackson hopes to profile as is Carlos Pena.  Tons of K's, low average, but enough walks and HR's to make it work, and good defense.

Obviously Pena isn't a 38% K-guy, over his career he's a shade over 31%. So Jackson's going to need to get better than the Iowa 38%.  But he's still got time to make some adjustments, and I don't think anybody who's a pro-Jackson optimist really does so assuming he'll always K at 38%.  In the lower minors he tended to come in somewhat nearer 26%.  So I don't think it's fantasy to project that if things go well for him (which is of course no guarantee), that he'd manage his K-problem to at or below the Carlos Pena level. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 04, 2011, 08:24:21 am
This is the guy that Brett Jackson makes me think of:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/w/wilkebr01.shtml

Hopefully Jackson can remain productive beyond age 27, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 04, 2011, 09:01:37 am
br, that's an excellent analog for what we might hope Jackson to turn into.  Nice! 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 04, 2011, 11:07:40 am
Curtis Granderson is another possible comp.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on August 04, 2011, 01:43:39 pm
or Grady Sizemore
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2011, 05:14:30 pm
Way, way too early to condemn Jackson as a .220 hitter.  He'll likely be better than that, but with less power than Pena.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2011, 09:30:54 pm
Burgess: 3-4, HR, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_04_lakafa_dbcafa_1

Vitters: 2-4, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_04_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2011, 10:11:04 pm
Jackson: 3-4, HR, RBI

Struck: 6-5-1-1-0-7

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_04_freaaa_iowaaa_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_04_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 04, 2011, 10:44:50 pm
Jackson up to .293/.400/.573.  His strikeout rate is still awful overall, but he has a much more reasonable 8 Ks in his last 10 games (35 AB; 23%). 

I'm sure Jaramillo will fix that walk rate once he gets to the major league team, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2011, 11:43:30 pm
Golden: 3-4, 3B, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_04_skvasx_boiasx_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 05, 2011, 04:29:06 am
Quote
It didn’t take long for Zapata to show his speed in Boise. He made his Hawks debut Tuesday night and singled safely on a bunt.

“He was 3.6 (seconds) to first, which is crazy fast,” Johnson said.

Crazy enough to put him in the company of Mariners outfielder Ichiro Suzuki, who is one of the fastest players in the majors.


http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/08/05/1750730/newest-hawks-outfielder-menace.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 05, 2011, 07:02:10 am
Jackson up to .293/.400/.573.  His strikeout rate is still awful overall, but he has a much more reasonable 8 Ks in his last 10 games (35 AB; 23%).

I believe we are evaluating Jackson wrong.

If we just add hypothetical contact to his ABs, the strikeout rate is not bad at all, and in fact since that contact would result in balls in play, applying Jackson's BABIP to the ABs with the hypothetical contact, his BA would also increase.

Scotti might be able to explain it even better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 05, 2011, 11:58:14 am
THAT'S what we are missing.  A "Scotti" explanation of "Jesmath".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 05, 2011, 12:08:53 pm
Another strong 2 inning start for Guzman. 

Looks like a lock for a September callup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 05, 2011, 12:28:51 pm
THAT'S what we are missing.  A "Scotti" explanation of "Jesmath".

Jesmath may have problems reading numbers, adding or subracting, or dividing.... but Jesmath does not use hypothetical HR in determining BA or OPS.

For that, you truly need Scotti.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 05, 2011, 03:32:14 pm
Hernandez: 3-4, 2B, RBI, BB , ( last 10 games: 19-41, 12 RBI, 1.256 OPS )

Rosario: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB, K, 2 PB's

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_05_cubrok_giarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 05, 2011, 04:13:34 pm
Roster moves:

OF Matt Spencer from Tennessee to Iowa.
RHP Larry Suarez added to Tennessee roster. RHP Marcus Hatley to the DL. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 05, 2011, 06:33:23 pm
Chris Carpenter is on the DL with a strained oblique.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 05, 2011, 07:35:10 pm
Man, that's an aggressive promotion for Suarez.

Three home runs in twelve innings pitched?  Don't worry, be happy!

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 05, 2011, 07:40:05 pm
Is D.J. LeMahieu the worst "prospect" in baseball?  Discuss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 05, 2011, 09:38:23 pm
No, he's not even the worst Cubs' "prospect."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 05, 2011, 10:15:21 pm
Abreu: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_05_lakafa_dbcafa_1


Kirk: 6 IP, 1 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_05_burafx_peoafx_1

Tenn rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 05, 2011, 10:51:12 pm
Jackson: 1-4, 2B, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_05_freaaa_iowaaa_1

Golden: 0-4, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_05_skvasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 05, 2011, 11:43:20 pm
Quote
Jackson has had to learn to work his way out of a slump, deal with an injury and handle the adjustment of moving from double-A Tennessee to triple-A Des Moines in the middle of a season.

.....

“I don’t say I go into slumps,” the fleet-footed Jackson said. “I call them periods of adjustment. Certainly I’ve had a bigger period of adjustment than I ever have had in my career, coming off an injury. For a long time I was trying to find what would work. Mentally, I had shifted. I’ve made adjustments continually since then.”


.....

Jackson credits coaching, watching videotape of his swing and making minor adjustments in that swing for his improved production.


http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20110805/SPORTS1402/110805046/Brett-Jackson-s-hot-August-not-enough-for-Iowa-Cubs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 06, 2011, 06:22:12 am
Thanks again, Chris, for keeping us up to date on minor league articles and results.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: sam hannam on August 06, 2011, 10:11:52 am
Leadoff-hitter Taiwan Easterling went 4-for-5 Friday for Peoria.

http://www.pjstar.com/sports/chiefs/x2111992323/Leadoff-hitter-sets-up-Chiefs-victory-over-Burlington

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 06, 2011, 10:19:58 am
bust.  If he was any good he would have gone 5-5.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 06, 2011, 10:35:39 am
And not a single home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on August 06, 2011, 10:52:58 am
While college kids assigned to low-A are usually non-prospects.  Easterling focused on football early in his college career.  So I don't think I'd call him a "bust" yet.  Let's give him another week or two! Anyways, it's nice to get an athlete so late in the draft. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 06, 2011, 10:56:21 am
dallen, welcome to the board.

You'll have to learn that there are those of us who can't be taken seriously.

We call all Cub signees "busts."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 06, 2011, 12:18:20 pm
Almost all signees start out in Mesa for a couple of weeks.  Easterling has played just about where you would expect him to play so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2011, 04:13:27 pm
Hernandez: 2-5, 2 RBI, 2 SB

Amaya: 2-3, SB, K

Davis: 2-5, 3B, RBI , ( 3 3B's in 27 AB's )

Hartman: 3-2-1-1-0-6


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_06_brrrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2011, 07:24:57 pm
Vitters: 2-3, HR, 3 RBI , ( August: 7-17, 6 RBI, 2 BB, 1 K )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_06_tenaax_hunaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2011, 08:28:45 pm
Abreu: 1-4, 2B, Assist

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_06_dbcafa_clrafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2011, 12:13:42 am

Vitters: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_06_tenaax_hunaax_2


Jackson: 0-4, 2 K

Coleman: 7 IP, 2 R ,  ( 2 R or less 4 of last 5 starts )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_06_freaaa_iowaaa_1


Golden: 2-4, 3B, 4 RBI, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_06_skvasx_boiasx_1


Chiefs:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_06_cedafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2011, 01:27:28 am
Candelario: 2-4, RBI, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_06_dchrok_dphrok_1


Sanchez: 1-3, HR, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_06_ddirok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 07, 2011, 08:43:37 am
Vitters is now 13 for his last 35, with a BA of .371 and OPS of 1.025, and a line of .284/.321/.455/.776 for the season.

CFer James Adduci is at .329/.390/.472/.862 for the season, and about the same in his last 10 games.  Adduci is also 18-2 in steals for the season.

Some others at Iowa:
Steve Clevenger   C   .387/.429/.573/1.002
Bryan LaHair   1B      .327/408/.638/.1.046
Welington Castillo   C   .315/376/.589/.965
Brad Snyder   RF      .302/.350/.497/.846

Assuming all of these guys continue as they have been (and with Vitters that means staying hot, and not reverting back to his full season averages), I would like to see all called up for late season looks, with Clevenger and Castillo splitting catching duties and with Soto and Hill getting very little playing time.  Plant LaHair at 1B, Vitters at 3B, and Adduci in LF.

See how they can do.  Some might look as if they could be ready next year, particularly if the team is willing to suffer some growing pains.

Brad Snyder is a bit different.  He's 29, and has in the past been very highly rated, but has seen his star fade.  This might be his last chance to have any value.  I would bring him up right now and put him in LF (Soriano should be a 5th OFer/PHer the rest of the season) to see what he can do.  If he does reasonably well, some team might well be willing to look at him as a cheap OF option for the next couple of years and give up a decent (not high) prospect for him at the end of the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 07, 2011, 03:28:43 pm
Brett Jackson with a leadoff home run today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on August 07, 2011, 07:31:50 pm
Candelario is only 17 and in the DSL. How do you prospect-raters think you'll slot a kid like that in your end-of-year prospect ratings (assuming he more or less maintains his current numbers)? Is DSl performance too iffy to include him in a top 30 ranking?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2011, 08:13:18 pm
Jackson: 2-3, 2 HR, 2 RBI, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_07_srcaaa_iowaaa_1


Szczur: 2-5, 2 RBI, SB

Rhee: 6-7-3-3-3-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_07_dbcafa_clrafa_1


Geiger: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_07_cedafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2011, 08:17:56 pm
Amaya: 2-4, 2B, 3B

Hernandez: 2-4, 2B, RBI , (14-GM hit-streak)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_07_cubrok_angrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 07, 2011, 08:23:17 pm
Candelario is only 17 and in the DSL. How do you prospect-raters think you'll slot a kid like that in your end-of-year prospect ratings (assuming he more or less maintains his current numbers)? Is DSl performance too iffy to include him in a top 30 ranking?

You can't really rate someone based upon DSI stats, but I have received scouting reports on Candelario that will put him near, if not in my top 10.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2011, 08:29:56 pm
In this system?

Candelario could be top 3 in this system.

Kidding....

Sorta.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 07, 2011, 09:08:17 pm
Call up Jackson and let Byrd play left.  Let Jackson lose his baby teeth in games that mean nothing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2011, 10:46:05 pm
Ha: 3-5, 2B, 2 RBI

McNutt: 4-7-2-2-1-6

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_07_tenaax_hunaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 07, 2011, 10:49:15 pm
Candelario is only 17 and in the DSL. How do you prospect-raters think you'll slot a kid like that in your end-of-year prospect ratings (assuming he more or less maintains his current numbers)? Is DSl performance too iffy to include him in a top 30 ranking?

I've never really done a top 30 ranking but if I did one, I would probably rank him above Hayden Simpson (who wouldn't be in my top 30 at all because he's shown nothing so far, due to illness or lack of ability), Jay Jackson and maybe Trevor Gretzky and Garrett Schlecht but behind Javier Baez, Brett Jackson, Josh Vitters, Matt Szczur and Ryan Flaherty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2011, 11:35:27 pm
Cruz: 5-1-0-0-4-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_07_boiasx_triasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 08, 2011, 07:48:53 am
Call up Jackson and let Byrd play left.  Let Jackson lose his baby teeth in games that mean nothing.

Yes.  Jackson needs to get accustomed to playing in games that mean nothing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 08, 2011, 08:03:29 am
Cruz: 5-1-0-0-4-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_07_boiasx_triasx_1
Cruz turns 21 today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 08, 2011, 03:50:49 pm
Hernandez: 1-4, E, (15-game hit-streak)

Kim: 5-5-0-0-1-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_08_dodrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 08, 2011, 08:06:30 pm
Je Baez: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_08_dmlrok_dchrok_1

Candelario: 1-3, 2B, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_08_dmlrok_dchrok_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on August 08, 2011, 08:50:31 pm
Man, Penalver was born in May of 1994! And he tends to hit 3rd and plays SS. There must be something there from a scouting perspective (and given that he has 32 walks to go with 32 Ks says he has something there in terms of plate awareness too. Hopefully.)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 08, 2011, 08:56:22 pm
Abreu: 3-4, 3B, K

Antigua: 6-1/3 -4-1-1-2-8 , ( 28-3  K/BB last 4 starts )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_08_dbcafa_clrafa_1


Smokies rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 08, 2011, 09:33:15 pm
Don't know what's gotten into Chris Rusin but perhaps we should start taking him more seriously as a prospect.

Jackson: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 2 K

Rusin: 7-6-0-0-0-11 , ( 27 K's, 4 BB at Iowa )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_08_srcaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 08, 2011, 09:35:07 pm
Rusin was pretty good at AA, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 08, 2011, 09:44:23 pm
Rusin has not been on my radar screen at all since he was drafted, in part because for some reason I expected Raley to be the better prospect.  But with a minor league record of 4 strike outs to every walk, Rusin is starting to look interesting to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 08, 2011, 10:21:53 pm
ArizonaPhil

Hernandez is hitting 426/453/639 with four doubles, three triples, a HR and 16 RBI, with only six strikeouts in 65 PA over the course of the 15-game hit streak, and is hitting 354/391/497 for the season. The 18-year old Dominican leads the AZL in RBI, and is tied for 3rd in the league in doubles. And (not too surprisingly) Hernandez was in the middle of the Cubs two-run 4th today, looping a single to CF that advanced Gioskar Amaya (who is hitting 366/401/486) to 3rd base with no outs. Both Amaya and Hernandez scored later in the inning. 

Kim received a reported $850K bonus (equivalent to "2nd round money") when he signed with the Cubs as a 17-year old out of South Korea last year, and after struggling at AZ Instructs (7.20 ERA & 1.30 WHIP) last fall and at Extended Spring Training (4.91 ERA & 1.68 WHIP) and at Boise (7.66 & 2.15 WHIP) earlier this year, the 19-year old right-hander has (finally) put together a couple of decent outings, throwing 8.1 IP of shutout ball for the AZL Cubs. He allowed five hits and a walk in his five innings (61 pitches - 45 strikes, 3/5 GO/FO) today, and probably could have thrown at least another couple of innings, but there is a limit of 75 pitches or five innings (whichever comes first) for pitchers in the AZL. 

18-year old RHP James Pugliese (Cubs 2011 18th round draft pick out of Mercer CC in New Jersey) piggy-backed with Kim, and threw three shutout innings of one-hit ball with no walks and four strikeouts (48 pitches - 30 strikes). Pugliesse is the guy with the max-effort extreme over-the-top delivery that would seem best-suited for a pitcher working out of the bullpen. 

RHP Yilver Sanchez pitched the 9th and picked up the save. The 21-year old Dominican did allow a two-out RBI double before recording the final out, but only because the Cubs defensively-challenged 2B-SS combo (Brian Inoa & Gioskar Amaya) failed to turn what should have been a game-ending DP on the previous AB. Working as the AZL Cubs primary closer since getting sent-down from Boise, Sanchez now has a 3/22 BB/K in 15.0 IP for the AZL Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 08, 2011, 11:37:39 pm
Burke: 2-1/3 -1-0-0-0-3 , ( 12 K's, 2 BB, last 3 apps )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_08_boiasx_triasx_1

Chiefs:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_08_cedafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 08, 2011, 11:41:11 pm
Something the Cubs system hasn't had in a while.  Ignoring that LeHair has 30 home runs, the Cubs have two other first basemen with 20 or more home runs so far this year, Bour and Jones.

In addition, they have signed Hoilman and Shoulders, both seen as power hitting prospects.

And that doesn't include their second round choice, Vogelbach, considered to be the best high school power prospect in the draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2011, 01:31:06 am
Quote
Robinson was also the battery mate for Cubs starter Chris Rusin, who struck out a career-high 11 batters in seven shutout innings as Iowa won for the fifth time in six games.

“When you have a guy who is on like that, and he’s throwing four pitches for strikes, it’s like a video game,” Robinson said. “It’s fun. Like you can throw anything, on any count. He was throwing his cutter to both sides of the plate, throwing his fastball and sinker to both sides of the plate. That’s a good-hitting ballclub.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 09, 2011, 07:45:12 am
cutter

Craig will be thrilled.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 09, 2011, 08:29:00 am
Down On The Farm

Quote
We are now at the three-quarter mark of the minor league season. At this point a system philosophy seemed to have emerged. However, the disconnect between the minors and the Major League front office appears to be stronger than ever; the in-season revolving door remains, as does the policy of not placing prospects in a position to succeed at the Major League level.

While the Cub affiliates produced twenty-three All-Stars this season, only seven of them were promoted while two (D.J. LeMahieu, Marco Carrillo) were technically demoted. The 40-man roster and the rosters of Triple-A Iowa and Double-A Tennessee are in need of an overhaul, as talent is starting to back up in High Class-A Daytona, Class-A Peoria, Short Season-A Boise, Rookie AZL Cubs, and the Dominican Summer League.

Here's an overview as to what may be the organization's direction, as well as how the affiliates have performed for this quarter.

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/08/cubsminors80911.php#more (http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/08/cubsminors80911.php#more)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 09, 2011, 09:41:25 am
Sometimes I wonder if Wrigley Field could sell another beer if Fleita were put in charge of the beer vendors....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 11:43:01 am
"In short, if the Chicago Cubs decide to let their talent develop from within the organization, the team you see will bear little resemblance to your older brother's Cubs, much less your father's or grandfather's Cubs"

He seems to be giving that as a criticism.  I guess that is because your older brother's Cubs were so successful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 01:17:06 pm
ArizonaPhil

One thing Brett Jackson will do anywhere he plays is walk a lot. He takes a lot of pitches, and doesn't consider it to be a defeat if he gets called out on strikes.

In terms of patience, I would compare Jackson to Carlos Pena, except Pena has more pure HR power, while B-Jax is more of a slash hitter with lift, is MUCH faster, can steal bases, can score from 2nd base on a single to the OF or from 1st base on a double, can advance from 1st to 3rd on a single to the OF, and can play CF.

But while he is extremely patient at the plate, he is not a passive player. He plays OF defense and runs the bases with the abandon of a Reed Johnson or an Eric Byrnes. He is a gambler, whether it be gambling that he won't get called out on strikes, or gambling that he can get from 1st to 3rd on a bloop single to CF, or gambling that he can catch a ball in the gap by diving for it.

Brett Jackson is probably not going to hit for a high batting average in MLB, but I could see him having an OBP 100-125 points higher than his BA, but with lots of XBH (20-10-25 HR-3B-2B) and 20 SB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 09, 2011, 01:26:33 pm
I was surprised at how big Jackson looked in person.

He reminded me of a LH-hitting Hunter Pence.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 09, 2011, 02:14:20 pm
Jackson has hit for a decent average everywhere he's been, so I think a lot of the doomsday scenarios about him being a .200 hitter are going to be off the mark.  Of course, with excellent patience and some pop he has a nice margin for error, especially as a CF.

My guess for a typical Jackson year if he pans out - .275-.390-.470.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 09, 2011, 02:36:51 pm
Jackson has hit for a decent average everywhere he's been, so I think a lot of the doomsday scenarios about him being a .200 hitter are going to be off the mark.  Of course, with excellent patience and some pop he has a nice margin for error, especially as a CF.

My guess for a typical Jackson year if he pans out - .275-.390-.470.

I would be pretty happy with that in a good CF who can run well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 09, 2011, 02:37:36 pm
.260/.370/.450
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 09, 2011, 02:47:01 pm
.260/.370/.450

Rick Monday.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/mondari01.shtml
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 09, 2011, 02:48:04 pm
Yeah, it's nice for once to have a prospect who doesn't have to hit .280 or better to be a productive player at the major league level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on August 09, 2011, 03:09:52 pm
You thinking of anyone in particular Barne...I mean...br?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 09, 2011, 04:03:13 pm
Rick Monday was a good player, so you wouldn't complain about that kind of career from Jackson.  He might be better, but an .820 OPS and 15-20 SB from a solid defensive CF is borderline All-Star.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 09, 2011, 04:11:43 pm
Bobby Murcer was another guy in that same mold.  Kirk Gibson, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 09, 2011, 04:15:40 pm
Matt Szczur and Brett Jackson could make a nice 1-2 at the top of the order.  A patient LHH batting behind a true basestealing threat would be nifty.

Of course, Szczur-HJ Lee-Jackson might have been even better.   :'(
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 04:25:31 pm
Imagine if they had kept Dwayne Bacon and Fernando whats-his-name.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2011, 04:41:26 pm
Nothing new here, but John Sickels made Jackson his prospect-of-the-day:

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2011/8/9/2352271/prospect-of-the-day-brett-jackson-of-chicago-cubs#storyjump
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 09, 2011, 05:34:46 pm
"In short, if the Chicago Cubs decide to let their talent develop from within the organization, the team you see will bear little resemblance to your older brother's Cubs, much less your father's or grandfather's Cubs"

He seems to be giving that as a criticism.  I guess that is because your older brother's Cubs were so successful.

I didn't take it as a criticism, but merely an observation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 09, 2011, 05:42:08 pm
Rick Monday was a good player, so you wouldn't complain about that kind of career from Jackson.  He might be better, but an .820 OPS and 15-20 SB from a solid defensive CF is borderline All-Star.

Monday was a solid, contributing player, but never a cornerstone player, and always suffering from the fact that he never came close to the expectations associated with being the first player drafted.  Not just the first amateur player in that year, but ever in MLB.  But he did clearly have the best career of anyone drafted in the first round that year -- the next four best careers were Billy Conigliaro, Joe Coleman, Bernie Carbo and Ray Fosse.... then there was the fact that Bench was taken in the second round that year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2011, 08:16:23 pm
Sanchez: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI ,  ( last 10 gms: 8-31, 3 2B, 3B, 2 HR, 7 RBI, 4 BB, 1.008 OPS )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_09_dorrok_dcurok_1


Candelario: 3-5, 2B, RBI, K, E

Penalver: 2-5, 2 RBI, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_09_dchrok_drgrok_1



Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2011, 08:38:48 pm
Vitters: 2-3, 2B, 2 RBI, CS
 
Ha: 2-3, 2 2B, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_09_tenaax_hunaax_1


Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 09, 2011, 09:36:39 pm
Vitters is now up to .286/.322/.783 for the season... and in the last 10 games is at .351/.375/.943.  If he stays hot, he really should get a September callup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 09, 2011, 09:56:46 pm
Under no circumstances should Josh Vitters get a September callup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2011, 10:14:09 pm
Vitters: 1-3, 2B, RBI, 2 K, E

Suarez: 3-1-0-0-0-3

Ha: 2-4 , ( 18 for last 36 , 0 BB, 2 K )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_09_tenaax_hunaax_2


Didn't notice Brett Wallach had been demoted to Peoria:


Wallach: 5-3-2-2-2-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_09_cedafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2011, 10:23:20 pm
Jackson: 3-5, SB, BB, K

Lemahieu: 3-4, 2B, RBI, SB, BB , (2 for previous 35)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_09_srcaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 09, 2011, 10:27:27 pm
LeMahieu stole a base?  Did the opposing catcher fall down?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 09, 2011, 11:03:36 pm
Jackson is ripe...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 09, 2011, 11:04:38 pm
Let's bring him up so he can sit five days a week!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 09, 2011, 11:06:09 pm
Think of all he can learn by watching how Soriano "goes about his business"!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 09, 2011, 11:10:52 pm
Jeff on a roll.

I just came back from watching an Improv performance.  You're better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 09, 2011, 11:12:43 pm
I think Jeff means, "Sori."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2011, 11:30:19 pm
Golden: 2-3, 2B

Wang: 5-2-2-2-0-8

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_09_boiasx_triasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 09, 2011, 11:35:37 pm
B. Jackson now with a 313-407-615 line at Iowa.

Jackson is not eligible for the Rule 5 draft this off-season, so Cubs will taking up a roster space if he's brought up in September.  I guess they'll bring him up anyway for the seasoning.

Cubs actually may have a bit of a roster crunch after the season--lots of Rule 5 protection candidates, including Szuzur because of the stupid technicality that Cubs breached, of which I forget the details.  In any case, they have to roster Szuzur.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2011, 11:48:57 pm
According to ArizonaPhil, when the Cubs gave him a new contract, they had to release and resign him, and this made him eligible for rule 5 draft unless he is placed on the 40 man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 09, 2011, 11:57:49 pm
Thanks, Dave, for the details.

Below are the Rule 5 eligibles according to Ariz Phil:

CUBS ELIGIBLE FOR DECEMBER 2011 RULE 5 DRAFT
Abner Abreu, OF
Jeffry Antigua, LHP
Adrian Aviles, OF-LHP (unless RULE 55 FREE-AGENT - see above)
Jeffrey Beliveau, LHP
Dan Berlind, RHP (unless RULE 55 FREE-AGENT - see above)
Austin Bibens-Dirkx, RHP (unless RULE 55 FREE-AGENT - see above)
Smaily Borges, OF
Michael Brenly, C
Justin Bristow, RHP
Michael Burgess, OF
Kyler Burke, LHP (ex-OF)
David Cales, RHP
Matt Camp, IF-OF
Hung-Wen Chen, RHP
Steve Clevenger, C-1B
Manolin DeLeon, RHP
Carlos Figueroa, INF (unless RULE 55 FREE-AGENT - see above)
Eduardo Figueroa, RHP
Ryan Flaherty, IF-OF
Luis Flores, C
Marwin Gonzalez, IF-OF
Miguel Gonzalez, C
Yohan Gonzalez, RHP
Gian Guzman, IF-RHP (player coach)
Marcus Hatley, RHP
Jay Jackson, RHP
Junior Lake, SS
Blake Lalli, 1B-C
Jordan Latham, RHP
David Macias, IF-OF
Oswaldo Martinez, RHP
Craig Muschko, RHP
Jon Nagel, RHP
Jake Opitz, INF
Blake Parker, RHP
Nelson Perez, OF
Ramon Reyes, RHP
Dae-Eun Rhee, RHP
Rebel Ridling, 1B
Carlos Romero, C
Nate Samson, INF
Ryan Searle, RHP
Marquez Smith, 3B
Matt Spencer, 1B-OF
Larry Suarez, RHP
Matt Szczur, OF
Jose Tineo, RHP
Josh Vitters, 3B
Ty Wright, OF
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 09, 2011, 11:58:51 pm
That just seems like a stupid rule, doesn't it?

Shouldn't you be able to re-sign your own players without exposing them to the Rule 5 Draft?

They should really close that silly little loophole in the next CBA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 10, 2011, 06:08:44 am
That just seems like a stupid rule, doesn't it?

Shouldn't you be able to re-sign your own players without exposing them to the Rule 5 Draft?

They should really close that silly little loophole in the next CBA.

I suspect the rule is to make it harder for prospects to get a team to resign them to a new contract as the Cubs did, and since the union isn't going to care about it, they won't be pushing the issue.  Ownership likely does not view it as a loophole that harms them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 10, 2011, 06:08:57 am
Under no circumstances should Josh Vitters get a September callup.

Why?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 10, 2011, 07:43:45 am
He's not ready.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 10, 2011, 07:50:00 am
Reb, who would you roster?

My quick first impression:

Beliveau
Clevenger
Flaherty
Marwin Gonzalez
Rhee
Suarez
Szczur
Vitters
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 10, 2011, 08:24:06 am
He's not ready.

Jeff, I did not suggest calling Vitters up now.  I said hopefully he will remain hot (he is hitting quite well lately) and then get a September callup.

Your response was that, Under no circumstances should Josh Vitters get a September callup.

Forgive me for thinking that "no circumstances" would include even if he WERE ready, but that is sort of what the words mean.  But even if what you meant was that you do not believe that there are no circumstances under which he might be ready by September, the mere comment that he is "not ready" now, does not mean he could not be ready by September.

I am just trying to understand if your comment is anything more than your normal hyperbole.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 10, 2011, 08:27:19 am
Vitters is a not-quite-yet 22 year old with tremendous flaws in his game.  There is nothing that he could do between now and September 1st that would warrant a callup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 10, 2011, 08:31:37 am
If Vitters makes the majors, it will be based on his bat.  None of the rest of his game is going to matter, though it might influence where he plays.

If he continues hitting the rest of the month as he has so far, I would like to see him get substantial playing time in September.  It could help the team decide what to do with ARam, which is going to be a multi-million dollar decision.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 10, 2011, 08:44:42 am
Quote from: Bleacher Nation

A day after mentioning 18-year-old AZL prospect Marco Hernandez in the Bullets, another 18-year-old AZL prospect gets a mention: Gioskar Amaya is hitting .366/.401/.486 in 155 PA. He’s split time evenly between shortstop, third base, and second base, but his time at shortstop has been errorless (which is pretty hard to do in the lower levels of the minor leagues).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 10, 2011, 10:52:53 am
Reb, who would you roster?

My quick first impression:

Beliveau
Clevenger
Flaherty
Marwin Gonzalez
Rhee
Suarez
Szczur
Vitters

I suspect that other serious contenders for rostering may be:  Antigua (a nice run after a poor start)-Abreu (has been really good lately and may not want to lose only prospect from trade deadline?); Lake (flawed but with an upside); J. Jackson (unlikely but not a lot of pitiching prospects in upper minors.  Ryan Searle even?

Seems like more serious contenders for a spot than recent seasons.  Of course, LeMahieu is already on the 40-man because of the brief call-up a few weeks ago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 10, 2011, 10:58:14 am
Angel Guzman is another.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2011, 11:04:35 am
I suspect that other serious contenders for rostering may be:  Antigua (a nice run after a poor start)-Abreu (has been really good lately and may not want to lose only prospect from trade deadline?); Lake (flawed but with an upside); J. Jackson (unlikely but not a lot of pitiching prospects in upper minors.  Ryan Searle even?

Seems like more serious contenders for a spot than recent seasons.  Of course, LeMahieu is already on the 40-man because of the brief call-up a few weeks ago.

You don't see a lot of raw position players get taken in the Rule 5, though.  Other than maybe the Astros, there aren't a lot of teams who will want to waste a spot on the bench for a full year on a guy who most likely won't work out anyway.  I'm not even sure the Astros would want to spend a lot of time on Abreu or Lake either.  There will be a lot of Abner Abreu's or Junior Lake's in the Rule 5 for the Astros to choose from if they do want to take a flier on someone like that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 10, 2011, 11:27:52 am
I think a lot of teams have been burned on keeping a kid for a year on their rosters, like the Cubs did a couple years ago.  Unless you really feel that a kid is major league ready and you have a need for a 2B or a C or whatever, it's not a good move.  We may lose more guys in the other phase where minor league teams have a shot at guys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 10, 2011, 11:29:47 am
Good point on Abreu and Lake---longshots for rostering at best.

Cubs are now at 38, plus Cashner (and Schlitter) on the 60-day.  Counting them, that's 40.

For almost certain, delete Schlitter-R. Ortiz-Caridad-R. Lopez-Smit-Montanez-Grabow. That's seven.  Koyie Hill??? (Jeff is skeptical) for eight.

Reed Johnson is a FA. That's nine.  But, maybe he's back.  Keep open a spot for him possibly.

On the bubble for derostering:  Berg-Gaub-Maine-Mateo (if injury is deemed severe).  Maine and/or Gaub may get September callups.  Their situation may depend on how they look in September.

Let's assume that Wood is back and that Pena is either back or replaced by a free agent who takes that slot.

Add B. Jackson if he gets a September call-up.

Add any other free agents for whom Cubs will want to leave open a roster spot.  Starting pitcher?  Maybe add an opening for a possible Cubs Rule 5 pick?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2011, 11:31:01 am
Hak Lee update: 317-389-442, 4 HR, 28 SB, .964 fielding% (.932 entering 2011).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2011, 11:41:54 am
It isn't a good idea to put a prospect on the 40 man roster unless you plan to keep him there for quite a while.  When you deroster a prospect, he goes through waivers, and anyone can take him without having to keep him on their 25 man roster for a year.  All they have to do is put him on their 40 man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2011, 11:52:19 am
I think they will roster Abreu.  I agree with Reb that they won't want to take a chance of losing him at this point, even if that chance is rather tiny.

Guzman probably doesn't deserve a roster spot in view of his performance, but I hope they roster him anyway.  You gotta root for the guy after all he has gone through.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 10, 2011, 12:33:09 pm
Guzman probably doesn't deserve a roster spot in view of his performance, but I hope they roster him anyway.  You gotta root for the guy after all he has gone through.

I am rooting for him.  Just not to get added to the 40 man this fall.

I would love to see him return to the majors to throw another 20-25 top notch innings before his next trip to the DL, but not burn a roster spot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2011, 01:05:16 pm
They can give him Berg's spot without hurting the team very much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2011, 01:11:07 pm
Via John Manuel's chat:



Quote
itto (PR): What's the upside of Abreu, aquired by the Cubs in the Kosuke Fukudome deal?


John Manuel: We had a feature on Abreu earlier this year by venerable K-Tribe beat writer David Hall, and Abreu has all kinds of upside. He's got plus raw power and bat speed to spare. But he's one of the minors' freer swingers (kind of strange how the Cubs keep accumulating such players) and has to identify spin better, and that's just not a skill that develops overnight. Good to see him off to a good start in Daytona, but he's new there; curious to see if he makes adjustments when pitchers realize they don't have to throw him strikes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 10, 2011, 01:23:14 pm
Abreu put up very good numbers in the final 3 or 4 weeks in the Cleveland system too.  So, seems like he adjusted to those pitchers rather than vice versa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2011, 02:53:12 pm
Jackson: 2-4, 2B, RBI


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_10_srcaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 10, 2011, 03:34:15 pm
Interesting that, since their promotion to Iowa, Cubs seem to have settled on LeMahieu at 3B and Flaherty at 2B.  At Tenn, they were all over the place--probably because Vitters is/was the 3B regular at Tenn for the most part.

Both LeMahieu are Flaherty are physically huge for a 2B.  Flaherty is listed at 6-3, 220.  I don't know of any 2B in MLB that size currently in the majors as a regular or otherwise. 

LeMahieu is listed at 6-4.  I think biggest 2B now are Zobrist at TB and Walker at Pittsburgh, at 6-3, but neither is as heavy as Flaherty or quite as tall as LeMahieu.  Not sure if there has EVER been a 6-4 guy as a regular at 2B in MLB history.  Anybody know of such a guy?

In any case, perhaps neither one of these guys figures to be a 2B in the majors. I suppose LeMahieu has an outside shot as a freakishly tall 2B.  But, he has three homers all year and can't even hit homers in the PCL.  Hard to project him as a major league 3B with that power showing, so it's probably 2B or bust for LeMahieu.  Naturally, Cubs are playing him at 3B at Iowa.

Never seen Flaherty play, but would be kind of amazing if a guy 6-3 and 220 has the footwork and quickness to play 2B at the MLB level.  Naturally, Cubs are playing him at 2B at Iowa.

What I'm getting at is that don't have Cubs have this in reverse at Iowa?  I suppose what matters at this point is whether these guys can hit and they can always be moved later defensively, but why not get it right at AAA?

Trying in vain to see a coherent strategy here.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2011, 03:52:46 pm
One thing to me that suggests why the Cubs think Flaherty is more cut out for 2B than LeMahieu is that Flaherty was athletic enough to be a college shortstop his entire time at Vanderbilt, including the year they were #1, while LeMahieu had to be moved off of shortstop his last year at LSU. 

That gives me the impression that Flaherty probably has more athletic ability to handle a middle infield spot than LeMahieu.  At least at one time, Flaherty likely had better middle infield skills than LeMahieu.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 10, 2011, 04:03:02 pm
Interesting that, since their promotion to Iowa, Cubs seem to have settled on LeMahieu at 3B and Flaherty at 2B.  At Tenn, they were all over the place--probably because Vitters is/was the 3B regular at Tenn for the most part.

Both LeMahieu are Flaherty are physically huge for a 2B.  Flaherty is listed at 6-3, 220.  I don't know of any 2B in MLB that size currently in the majors as a regular or otherwise. 

LeMahieu is listed at 6-4.  I think biggest 2B now are Zobrist at TB and Walker at Pittsburgh, at 6-3, but neither is as heavy as Flaherty or quite as tall as LeMahieu.  Not sure if there has EVER been a 6-4 guy as a regular at 2B in MLB history.  Anybody know of such a guy?

In any case, perhaps neither one of these guys figures to be a 2B in the majors. I suppose LeMahieu has an outside shot as a freakishly tall 2B.  But, he has three homers all year and can't even hit homers in the PCL.  Hard to project him as a major league 3B with that power showing, so it's probably 2B or bust for LeMahieu.  Naturally, Cubs are playing him at 3B at Iowa.

Never seen Flaherty play, but would be kind of amazing if a guy 6-3 and 220 has the footwork and quickness to play 2B at the MLB level.  Naturally, Cubs are playing him at 2B at Iowa.

What I'm getting at is that don't have Cubs have this in reverse at Iowa?  I suppose what matters at this point is whether these guys can hit and they can always be moved later defensively, but why not get it right at AAA?

Trying in vain to see a coherent strategy here.


Your last paragraph summarizes my feelings about Fleita's reign very succinctly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 10, 2011, 04:06:03 pm
Interesting that, since their promotion to Iowa, Cubs seem to have settled on LeMahieu at 3B and Flaherty at 2B.  At Tenn, they were all over the place--probably because Vitters is/was the 3B regular at Tenn for the most part.

Both LeMahieu are Flaherty are physically huge for a 2B.  Flaherty is listed at 6-3, 220.  I don't know of any 2B in MLB that size currently in the majors as a regular or otherwise. 

LeMahieu is listed at 6-4.  I think biggest 2B now are Zobrist at TB and Walker at Pittsburgh, at 6-3, but neither is as heavy as Flaherty or quite as tall as LeMahieu.  Not sure if there has EVER been a 6-4 guy as a regular at 2B in MLB history.  Anybody know of such a guy?

In any case, perhaps neither one of these guys figures to be a 2B in the majors. I suppose LeMahieu has an outside shot as a freakishly tall 2B.  But, he has three homers all year and can't even hit homers in the PCL.  Hard to project him as a major league 3B with that power showing, so it's probably 2B or bust for LeMahieu.  Naturally, Cubs are playing him at 3B at Iowa.

Never seen Flaherty play, but would be kind of amazing if a guy 6-3 and 220 has the footwork and quickness to play 2B at the MLB level.  Naturally, Cubs are playing him at 2B at Iowa.

What I'm getting at is that don't have Cubs have this in reverse at Iowa?  I suppose what matters at this point is whether these guys can hit and they can always be moved later defensively, but why not get it right at AAA?

Trying in vain to see a coherent strategy here.


Your last paragraph summarizes my feelings about Fleita's reign very succinctly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2011, 04:14:50 pm
Hernandez: 2-4, 3B, 2 RBI, BB , (16-GM hit-streak)

Amaya: 1-3, 2 BB, CS


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_10_rngrok_cubrok_1
Title: Tales of two halves
Post by: dallen7908 on August 10, 2011, 06:54:26 pm
I'm not sure if its the tougher competition, his time in Chicago, a slump, or a sample size fluke but Lemahieu has a 0.627 OPS at Iowa (138 AB)after putting up a 0.878 OPS at Tennessee (187 AB).

Junior Lake may have the strongest IF arm in AA but he is also struggling after a mid-season promotion.  0.834 OPS at Daytona, 0.602 OPS at Tennessee.

Nelson Perez, although only a minor prospect, has held his own after being promoted to AA.  His numbers: 0.875 at Daytona and 0.776 at Tennessee.

Jae-Hoon Ha has thrived since being promoted to AA.  His Daytona OPS was 0.733.  His AA OPS is 0.793.

Brett Jackson had a mildly disappoint 0.816 OPS at Tennessee.  His current OPS at Iowa is 1.022!

Marwin Gonzalez, currently in a funk at Iowa, has comparable AA and AAA numbers this year.

Matt Szczur has struggled since his promotion to Daytona.  His low-A OPS was 0.797.  His high-A OPS is 0.697.

On the pitching front, Chris Rusin, Kyler Burke, and James Pugliese all had good weeks.


 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2011, 07:39:24 pm
ArizonaPhil refers to Mesa catcher as "possibly the slowest runner in professional baseball".

I hate to see Harry Chiti's only claim to fame fall short.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2011, 07:48:50 pm
Candelario: 1-2, 2B, 2 RBI, 2 BB

Penalver: 1-3, 2B, SF, 2 RBI

Victor Garcia: 4-2-1-1-1-8   ( 24 IP, 17 H, 11 BB, 33 K in 6 starts )
 

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_10_dyarok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on August 10, 2011, 08:03:32 pm
read where Hak-Ju Lee got promoted to AA, and the Rays former #1 overall pick Beckham went up to AAA. Good for Lee, he's an outstanding prospect. Although he has 28 SB, he has been caught 14 times. So, he's not perfect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2011, 08:36:37 pm
Lee has been very mediocre at the plate since the all-star break. OPS down 200 points.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2011, 09:13:54 pm
Vitters: 1-4, 2 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_10_jaxaax_tenaax_1


Kirk: 4-2/3 IP, 4 ER

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_10_peoafx_kccafx_1

Daytona DH rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2011, 11:00:45 pm
Golden: 0-2, 2 BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_10_eugasx_boiasx_1


Ortega: 0-3, 2 SB, 2 BB, K

Sanchez: 2-5, 2 RBI, 2 SB, 3 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_10_dcurok_dparok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2011, 11:20:17 pm
Don't expect to see Jackson  this year, if Quade has anything to say:

   
Quote
"You can talk about the Jacksons and some of the other people we're excited about, some of the younger players, but I'd like to see guys here who are ready to be here and ready to be taking a serious look atI think by the end of the season at both Double-A and Triple-A, we'll have a better idea."

Quade mentioned players like Casey Coleman and Bryan LaHair as possible call-ups when rosters expand.

    "I look at a guy like Bryan LaHair -- what a year he's having," Quade said. "He's hit 30 home runs in Triple-A, and I'd expect to see him up here and take a look at him. He's been doing a great job at Triple-A for years."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 10, 2011, 11:21:59 pm
Seriously, is there a more perfect manager for Jim Hendry than Mike Quade?

It's like they're sharing the same brain cell.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2011, 11:43:58 pm
Jees.  A couple of days ago people were bitching because it didn't look like they would call up LaHair.  Now there is bitching because it looks like they willcall up LaHair.

Nice to know that some things are predictable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 04:13:00 am
Piece on Kyler Burke's pitching:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/08/11/1756597/changeup-burke-making-strides.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2011, 04:41:09 am
Jees.  A couple of days ago people were ****ing because it didn't look like they would call up LaHair.  Now there is ****ing because it looks like they willcall up LaHair.  Nice to know that some things are predictable.

Who was pissing because it looks like they will call up LaHair?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 11, 2011, 09:08:47 am
Quote
"You can talk about the Jacksons and some of the other people we're excited about, some of the younger players, but I'd like to see guys here who are ready to be here and ready to be taking a serious look atI think by the end of the season at both Double-A and Triple-A, we'll have a better idea."

I think I need someone fluent in Quadese to interpret this for me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2011, 09:30:16 am
Just a problem with run-on sentences and failing to stop when he speaks, and some things which he meant likely understood from the full context of the exchange.

"You can talk about the (Jay) Jacksons and some of the other people we're excited about, some of the (other) younger players (in the minors being called up to play here), but I'd like to see guys here who are ready to be here and ready to be taking a serious look at (play regularly.)  I think by the end of the season at both Double-A and Triple-A, we'll have a better idea (of who to call up)."

Eliminate the strikeout language, and insert the language in the parenthesis, and you have the following:

"You can talk about Jay Jackson and some of the other younger players in the minors being called up to play here, but I'd like to see guys here who are ready to be here and play regularly.   I think by the end of the season at both Double-A and Triple-A, we'll have a better idea of who to call up."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 11, 2011, 09:38:07 am
Jay?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 11, 2011, 09:59:05 am
Hi, guys, back from a little vacation.  Thanks for all the updates and discussion and entertainment, both on this thread and the draft thread.  Hopefully we'll get some good draftees signed by next week. 

Quade says all kinds of dopey stuff, and it's hard to know what he's thinking.

I think his primary point, which I think is justifiable if I'm reading his mind correctly, is that he's OK with bringing up guys who might be big-league ready and who are meaningful prospects for April.  But he's not too interesting in getting stuck with raw younger players who aren't going to be real possibilities for the team right now. 

Don't be bringing somebody up "as a reward", or bringing somebody up as a developmental thing, just so that they can watch how the major leaguers go about their business, or have a preview about what big-league life is like.  If you really think you might give Jackson a regular job next April, and that he's ready, fine, call him up.  But if it's some deal where Vitters still has a bunch of things to work on, so that even if he was on the team Quade would still be playing Baker ahead of him anyway, why bother?  If it's a deal where even if Vitters has a really hot spring training, and Quade is inclined to keep him, but Hendry is going to say "No, we want him playing regularly, so even if you want him up we're going to send him down", then I don't think Quade wants to see somebody like that called up now. 

Wellington Castillo comes to mind, in a sense:  he was really impressive in camp, and clearly outplayed Koyie.  I think Quade maybe wanted to keep him, but Hendry said no.  If a guy is going to be in that situation next spring, and Quade isn't going to have the "luxury" of using that prospect to enrich his bench next April, then I don't think he wants to steal playing time from the veterans this September. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2011, 10:15:43 am
Craig, if Quade would be playing Baker ahead of Vitters if Vitters were called up, Quade would have to qualify as retarded.

If Vitters is called up, it would presumably be because he continues his recent hot hitting thru the rest of the month, and if so (which is the only way I could see him getting called up), then he needs to be planted at 3B so the team can take a look at him and form a meaningful opinion, not only about Vitters and when (if ever) he might be ready for the majors, but also about resigning ARam.  That is a decision which involves at least $10M, the difference between what the Cubs would pay Vitters and what they would pay ARam even with an absurdly friendly "home-team discount."

$10M+ of the team's payroll for next year is no small matter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 11, 2011, 11:53:51 am
Isn't Burke a 6 year free agent after this season.  I wouldn't be surprised if the Cubs gave him a roster slot just so they don't lose him for nothing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 11, 2011, 02:54:58 pm
One less thing to worry about.  Dave Bush has opted out of his minor league contract.  We won't be seeing him in Wrigley.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 11, 2011, 03:03:41 pm
Whew.  Best news of the day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 11, 2011, 03:05:01 pm
Damb.  Now we're out of it.  We no longer are in this thing.

I guess Q can relax.  He won't have Bushy to worry about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 04:21:29 pm
Hernandez: 0-5, 2 K, E (hit-streak over)

Rosario: 2-4, 2B, RBI, BB, K

Simpson: 1-3-2-2-0-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_11_angrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 11, 2011, 05:36:43 pm
Des Moines, IA - The Chicago Cubs have activated Welington Castillo and Marquez Smith from the disabled list and added them to the Iowa Cubs active roster. The pair will re-join the team tomorrow night in Tacoma. Steve Clevenger and Jonathan Mota have been reassigned to double-A Tennessee. In an unrelated move, Dave Bush opted out of his contract and is now a free agent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2011, 06:00:43 pm
While it may not be on OUR farm.... http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/bryce-harper-ejected-from-double-a-game-after-confrontation-with-umpire/  Bryce Harper needs to mature a bit before he reaches the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 06:21:51 pm
Szczur: 0-3  ,  8 for last 40 (.200) w/ 1 BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_11_dbcafa_lakafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 11, 2011, 06:40:39 pm
Poor Steve Clevenger.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 07:38:40 pm
Two interesting pieces on Chris Rusin and Abner Abreu.

First Rusin:


Quote
Rusin didn’t allow a run in either of his last two starts at Tennessee, an 11-inning stretch in which he surrendered only three hits, making what he’s done over the last six weeks that much more impressive.

“At the beginning of the year I didn’t have the sink that I have now,” Rusin said. “I was struggling to get that movement and the pitches were moving on a flat plane rather than downward to the right or left. The pitching coordinator came in, worked with me a little, tweaked something in my delivery and from that point on I’ve had pretty good movement and got my sink.”

....

“I’ve gotten sharper with the rotation and my off-speed pitches,” Rusin said. “I’m locating them better now with two strikes. Early in the season I struggled to find the command and I’ve gradually gotten better.


http://www.csnchicago.com/08/10/11/Cubs-prospect-Rusin-in-command-at-Iowa/landing_onthefarm.html?blockID=547119&feedID=6200


Abreu:


Quote
“I’m confident now,” Abreu told CSNChicago.com. “I was scared. I’m an aggressive player and I was playing too passive. That wasn’t me. Right now, I think this is the player I am. I’m playing the way I always played before. The difference is that when I came back from the injuries I had lost confidence and I was shy. I was thinking too much, which is why I was struggling.

“Now, I’m just doing the things the way I’ve always done them. This is the way I have played since I was a kid. Just play the game. I started to do that and stopped worrying about things. That was the main difference. Now I am back and I’m now worrying about anything. When that umpire says play ball I just play the game.”


http://www.csnchicago.com/08/11/11/Confident-Abreu-tackles-Florida-State-Le/landing_onthefarm.html?blockID=547682&feedID=619
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 07:53:37 pm
Sanchez: 1-1,  Left in the 2nd after getting caught stealing.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_11_dcurok_drorok_1


Candelario: 2-4, RBI, BB

Penalver: 3B, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_03_dchrok_dgirok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2011, 07:54:32 pm
“At the beginning of the year I didn’t have the sink that I have now,” Rusin said. “I was struggling to get that movement and the pitches were moving on a flat plane rather than downward to the right or left. The pitching coordinator came in, worked with me a little, tweaked something in my delivery and from that point on I’ve had pretty good movement and got my sink.”

Did the Cubs borrow the pitching coordinator from some other team to help him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 09:19:51 pm
Szczur: 1-4, 2B, RBI

Abreu DNP in either game.


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_11_dbcafa_lakafa_2



Iowa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 11, 2011, 09:29:37 pm
Szczur's OBP is up to .276.  But he's got 2 HR.  I'm not sure his power surge is worth the hacking absence of walks and OBP.  But granted, it's barely 100 AB, so who knows. 

Ryan Hartman at Mesa has 19K/3BB over his last 11 innings (spread out over 5 games.)  Nice. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 11, 2011, 09:34:22 pm
When Rusin's got his sink/movement/control going, and doesn't give up HR, he's good. 

I think some finesse guys are like that.  When their stuff is off, and they don't have the movement/location, HR's are one of the symptoms. 


Low HR's lately, good results.  Sinker/cutter/curve makes for a nice mix when they're all located and movement, no matter how slow. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 09:43:23 pm
Vitters: 2-5, 2 RBI , GW-ing RBI single in 9th, CS  (4-13 SB's)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_11_jaxaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 11, 2011, 09:52:46 pm
Why do the Cubs insist on running with prospects that have no business stealing bases?

Guys like Vitters should not be stealing.

Those caught stealings can't all be busted hit-and-runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 10:01:11 pm
Geiger: 0-5, BB, K, 2 E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_11_peoafx_kccafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 11, 2011, 10:23:24 pm
Quote from: Arizona Phil
Cubs 2010 #1 draft pick RHP Hayden Simpson got the start today, and threw one inning (21 pitches - 15 strikes), allowing two runs (both earned) on three hits (a single, a double, and a triple), with two strikeouts, and one pick-off.

While it might appear that Simpson had a bad outing, he actually looked OK. He threw his fastball consistently for strikes, and both of his strikeouts came on his curve ball (which he is now throwing in games again). The double was a high chopper that bounced off the rock-hard dirt in front of home plate and up & over the head of third-baseman Gioskar Amaya and down the LF line, the RBI triple was a grounder that bounced over the 1st base bag and rolled into the RF corner, and the RBI single was a broken bat blooper into short right-center. Why he was limited to throwing just one inning (and 21 pitches), I do not know.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 10:26:29 pm
Small steps....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2011, 11:31:00 pm
Golden: 2-5, 2B, RBI, K

Hoilman: 3-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_11_eugasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 12, 2011, 12:13:28 am
Cubs Double-A catcher Luis Flores was one of four Minor Leaguers suspended Thursday for violating the Minor League Drug Prevention and Treatment Program.

Flores, Chicago's seventh-round pick in 2008, received a 50-game ban after testing positive for Methylhexaneamine. The substance, originally created as a nasal decongestant, has been found in dietary supplements under various names in recent years.

The Del Rio, Texas native was hitting .275 with seven homers and 20 RBIs in 40 games with the Smokies this year. He last played Aug. 9, going hitless to extend a 5-for-29 slump.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=C&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=457745 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=C&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=457745)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 12, 2011, 06:31:37 am
Why do the Cubs insist on running with prospects that have no business stealing bases?  Guys like Vitters should not be stealing.  Those caught stealings can't all be busted hit-and-runs.

But they may all be situations in which the Cubs hope to have Vitters learn how to steal, or how to take a better lead, or how to slide.

The purpose of the minors is to prepare a player for the majors, and while the stats the players put up there may be an indication of how well they are doing, sometimes the stats are misleading because they fail to take account of instruction and in-game decisions which are intended more for instructional value than they are a reflection of the player's execution.

That is my hope with Szczur.  The guy has clearly shown an ability to take a walk and work a walk and judge the strike zone.  But his walk totals are down as his marginal power has increased.

Hopefully this is a result of deliberate experimentation and following instruction to try to develop some power.... and, hopefully, he will be able to revert back to form as soon as he wishes to do so.... and the Cubs will not have destroyed his real value by trying to make him into something he is not.

With Vitters, the CS numbers are not troubling at all.  If he makes it to the majors, he is simply told he does not try to steal.  Simple to take care of.  Not quite so clear that Szczur will be able to flip a switch quite so easily if he develops bad habits and loses good ones as a result of an effort to develop power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 12, 2011, 06:53:49 am
Golden: 2-5, 2B, RBI, K
Hoilman: 3-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, K
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_11_eugasx_boiasx_1

On checking the box score there I was quite hopeful the Cubs had another real catching prospect in R. Lopez -- A .306 BA with enough power to hit 3rd is nice in a catcher.  But in looking at his profile he will be 24 in less than two months, so his performance in Boise might not be so impressive.  But right now, with 147 AB, the LH hitting Lopez has a hitting line of .306/.382/.415/.797, with 18 walks and 20 Ks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 12, 2011, 07:01:58 am
Cubs Double-A catcher Luis Flores was one of four Minor Leaguers suspended Thursday for violating the Minor League Drug Prevention and Treatment Program.

Flores, Chicago's seventh-round pick in 2008, received a 50-game ban after testing positive for Methylhexaneamine. The substance, originally created as a nasal decongestant, has been found in dietary supplements under various names in recent years.

The Del Rio, Texas native was hitting .275 with seven homers and 20 RBIs in 40 games with the Smokies this year. He last played Aug. 9, going hitless to extend a 5-for-29 slump.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=C&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=457745 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=C&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=457745)

I guess you had to figure something didn't add up with Flores this season.  That guy just can't seem to stay out of trouble.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 12, 2011, 10:29:26 am
I agree that Lopez's age relative to the league make his numbers quite suspect.  When he performs like that in Daytona, we should probably start to take him seriously.

Neftali Rosario, on the other hand, started the season there as a 17 year old, and is putting up even better numbers than Lopez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2011, 10:49:48 am
Neftali Rosario, on the other hand, started the season there as a 17 year old, and is putting up even better numbers than Lopez.

Rosario's in Mesa. Lopez has played mainly in Boise.

Not that your point isn't valid because it is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2011, 12:28:41 pm
I hope someone inflated Golden's jersey and pants with a tire pump prior to this at-bat.


(http://mlblogsboisehawksradio.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/goldenaction.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2011, 01:24:16 pm
Jackson 8th in the newest Hot Sheet:

Quote
Team: Triple-A Iowa (Pacific Coast)
Age: 23

Why He's Here: .400/.444/.760 (10-for-25), 2 HR, 3 2B, 5 RBIs, 5 R, 2 BB, 6 SO, 1-for-1 SB

The Scoop: Jackson endured an adjustment period through his first 14 Triple-A games, batting 10-for-51 (.196) with strikeouts in 43 percent of his at-bats. But then he went 3-for-4 in the second game of a doubleheader against New Orleans on July 29 and hasn't stopped hitting since. Over the course of his most recent 14 games, Jackson has gone 22-for-49 (.449) with six homers, four doubles and a much more manageable strikeout rate of 22 percent. The 2009 first-round pick is angling for a September callup with a composite batting line of .275/.383/.494 with 17 homers and 19 steals this season.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2011/2612219.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 12, 2011, 01:36:58 pm
If he continues to hit well the rest of the month, he needs to get 20 or more starts in September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 12, 2011, 01:39:30 pm
Unfortunately, Iowa plays only five games in September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on August 12, 2011, 01:57:44 pm
Golden looks like Rerun from that old TV show Whats Happenin
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 12, 2011, 02:19:31 pm
For iphone owners, there's a new free MILB AAA app available for the rest of the season.

http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/12/milb-com-launches-free-triple-a-app/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2011, 03:29:11 pm
From Today's BA's chat:


Quote
      itto (PR): Brett jackson is having a good start in AAA, but it looks like most of the hitters have good numbers in the PCL. Does he have the tools to be an above average CF and leadoff hitter?


J.J. Cooper: There aren't a lot of things about Jackson that are above-average, but he's notable for how many things he does at an average level.


...


Quote
      Tony (Frederick, MD): Most 21 year olds in AAA get some attention. Nick Struck, not so much. Sure, his ceiling isn't huge (mid-rotation at best), but he's still developing and is touching mid-90's more consistently this year. What can you tell me about his secondary pitches, and how do you feel about his future?


J.J. Cooper: Struck's secondary pitches are below average now, but his future success probably depends on whether they can become average pitches down the road. His delivery isn't the greatest which sometimes affects his command, but the pieces are there to be a back-end of the rotation starter.

.....


Quote
      Tung-Jim (Frederick, MD): DJ LeMahieu was driving the ball a bit better in AA before that pointless call-up to the bigs. What's happened since he went down, as he's certainly not driving the ball? And can the Cubs please make a decision on LeMahieu and Flaherty's positions? I think it would do both of them well to have 1 main position.


J.J. Cooper: It would do both of them well if they end up being big league regulars, but if, like me, you think they end up as utilitymen (especially in LeMahieu's case), then the versatility isn't a big problem.

....


Quote
      Tony (Frederick, MD): Dae-Eun Rhee has shown flashes this year. Any reports on how his stuff is showing?


J.J. Cooper: Plus stuff, up to 94-95 mph with his fastball with a good changeup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2011, 04:11:20 pm
Hernandez: 3-5, 2B, K

Amaya: 2-3, 2 2B, 2 SF, 6 RBI, SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_12_cubrok_royrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2011, 09:17:41 pm
Szczur: 1-3, BB, K

Abreu must be hurt; still DNP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_12_clrafa_dbcafa_1


Tenn:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_12_jaxaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2011, 09:51:45 pm
Chiefs:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_12_peoafx_kccafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 12, 2011, 10:01:27 pm
Brett Jackson homered to lead off the game tonight for Iowa versus Tacoma. Iowa leads 6-0 in the third.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2011, 11:04:47 pm
Candelario: 2-4, 3B, RBI, 2 E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_12_dchrok_dmerok_1


Sanchez: 1-4, 2 RBI, BB, K, E (30)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_12_drdrok_dcurok_1

Boise:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_12_eugasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2011, 12:03:35 am
Jackson: 1-5, HR, 3 RBI, BB, 2 K

Coleman: 5-5-0-0-1-5 , ( 1.80 ERA last 4 starts; 29 K's, 4 BB last 6 starts )

Coello: 2-0-0-0-1-5 , ( In relief: 1.25 ERA, 0 HR, 11.6 K/9 )
                           
                           , ( Starting: 6.52 ERA, 11 HR, 7 K/9 )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_12_iowaaa_tacaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 13, 2011, 12:44:28 am
There's little doubt in my mind that if the current regime is back next year, Coello will be given another shot at a starting job with the big club next year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 13, 2011, 04:31:13 am
Coello?

Or Coleman?

Coleman, I can see.  It would make sense to call him up now and put him in the rotation.

Coello, looks as if he might get consideration for the bullpen, but he seems to have been quite ineffective as a starter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 13, 2011, 08:28:34 am
lol
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 13, 2011, 08:33:21 am
Jes, your sarcasm recognition system must be in the "off" position...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 13, 2011, 01:15:34 pm
Last night marked the fourth time in the last 14 games that Brett Jackson has started the first inning with a home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 13, 2011, 02:00:17 pm
Amaya is having an interesting year in Mesa.  He has played 40 games, and half of his extra base hits have been in the last 10 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2011, 03:51:48 pm
Amaya: 2-4, 2B, RBI, BB

Rosario: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_cubrok_cinrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 13, 2011, 06:39:25 pm
What level next year will  Amaya and Hernandez start out at ? Peoria ?

Candelario ? Peoria ?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 13, 2011, 06:40:19 pm
What level next year will  Amaya and Hernandez start out at ? Peoria ?

Candelario ? Peoria ?
Amaya mindreader?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 13, 2011, 06:54:03 pm
I wish I could say.  I assume that both of them will go to Peoria when the Boise season is over.  But I would think that both of them will go to the Arizona instructional league, and promotion from there will depend upon their performance there and in spring training.

Both are young, and could easily start in Boise next year, but if I had to make a bet today, I would expect both of them to start in Peoria.  Also, I would not be surprised if they decided to keep the two of them together, as they did with Lee/Watkins.

Candalerio is tougher.  I assume that he will move to Mesa next year, along with Penalver. 

But the keystone positions are going to be full at the lower levels next year.  They will have Penalver/Candelario, Amaya/Hernandez, Baez/Gonzalez

In addition, they have been playing Silva at 2B quite a bit, and they have to put Darvil somewhere.  They still seem to be rather high on him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2011, 07:37:03 pm
and they have to put Darvil somewhere.  They still seem to be rather high on him.

Why that would be is anyone's guess.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 13, 2011, 07:41:01 pm
I assume it is because they have seen him, and we haven't
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2011, 07:43:28 pm
I've seen his numbers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 13, 2011, 07:52:31 pm
Hard to imagine what else there could be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 13, 2011, 07:53:32 pm
They're poor evaluators of talent?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2011, 09:13:15 pm
McNutt: 6-3-3-3-3-6

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_jaxaax_tenaax_1

Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_cliafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 13, 2011, 09:27:19 pm
Amaya mindreader?

Well done, sir.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2011, 10:03:49 pm
Don't encourage him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2011, 10:08:36 pm
Rhee: 6-5-2-0-1-6

Kurcz: 1-2/3 -0-0-0-0-4  (1.50 ERA, 26 K's last 18 IP )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_clrafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2011, 10:30:37 pm
Sanchez: 1-2, BB, PO

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_dtwrok_dcurok_1


Candelario: 1-2, RBI, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_dchrok_dwarok_1



Candelario: 0-2, 2 BB, SB

Je Baez: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_dwarok_dchrok_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2011, 01:57:31 am
Devoss: 0-2, 4 BB, SB, 3 E

Zapata: 2-5, HR, 3 RBI, BB, K, E

Hoilman: 3-4, HR, RBI, BB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_eugasx_boiasx_1


Jackson: 0-4, 3 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_iowaaa_tacaaa_1



Sanchez: 0-4, 2 RBI, E

Ortega: 1-3, 2 BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_13_dcurok_dtwrok_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 14, 2011, 03:11:39 am
Fitzgerald is quite the ground ball pitcher.  If he could reduce his BBs, he might be a prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2011, 04:22:01 pm
Candelario: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 2 K

Je Baez: 2-5, 2 2B, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_14_dchrok_dmerok_1


Sanchez: 0-1, BB, K,  Replaced in the 5th

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_14_drdrok_dcurok_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2011, 04:28:23 pm
It looks like the Cubs have decided to move Candelario to third base for good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 14, 2011, 04:37:46 pm
In the past week, Cubs have flipped Flaherty and LeMahieu, with Flaherty now playing mostly 3B at Iowa.

This makes more sense to me, but I guess the brass is still undecided who goes where. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 14, 2011, 04:42:00 pm
They most likely have identified both of them as future utility players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2011, 04:59:59 pm
It looks like the Cubs have decided to move Candelario to third base for good.


Candelario's played 3rd base 98% of the time this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2011, 05:10:25 pm
I knew it had been a while.  Where did you get the stats?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2011, 05:27:08 pm
I was off a bit.

Candelario has DH'd in at least part of 6 games.

He's credited with 52 games at 3rd and 5 games at 1st, so 52-57 (91%) of the games in the field have come at 3rd base.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=candel000jei
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2011, 05:59:37 pm
Rusin: 6-7-6-5-2-7 , 3 HR

Jackson: 0-4, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_14_iowaaa_tacaaa_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_14_cliafx_peoafx_1


Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2011, 07:15:26 pm
Thanks, Chris.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2011, 07:34:34 pm
No problem.

Candelario's splits are pretty drastic. I'd like to see what he could do hitting left-handed full time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2011, 07:39:02 pm
Vitters: 2-4, RBI

Beliveau: 1-0-0-0-0-2  ( Last 11 apps: 15 IP, 9 H, 2 R, 17 K )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_14_jaxaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2011, 01:55:32 am
Golden: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI, 2 K

Chen: 3-3, 3B, HR, 5 RBI, BB, 2 SB, CS, Assist


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_14_eugasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 15, 2011, 10:56:58 am
Think it's time to put Zeke Devoss on kangaroo court trial for conduct unbecoming a Cub.

16 BB and 9Ks and a .442 OBP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2011, 11:48:17 am
Don't worry Reb, he also has 11 errors in 18 games at 2nd.

He's not Cub-tendency free.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 15, 2011, 11:54:05 am
Brenly made an interesting point a few days ago how players from major college programs can face a major adjustment when they move to the low minors.  They may be accustomed to playing on nice fields, in front of large crowds, with access to really excellent facilities - none of which is true when they go to Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 15, 2011, 12:07:41 pm
On the other hand, they live with an local "adoptive family" that feeds them.  They probably eat better than they have since they left home.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 15, 2011, 12:28:19 pm
Don't worry Reb, he also has 11 errors in 18 games at 2nd. He's not Cub-tendency free.

True, but gotta like the conversion to 2B and trying to develop him at that position.

Switch-hitter with speed and OBP at 2B is a nice idea.  Would love to know if DeVoss has the range and footwork to play 2B---probably more important than the errors he's making now. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2011, 03:31:48 pm
Quote from: Bruce Miles
Speaking of players with local ties, left-handed pitcher Eric Jokisch has been promoted from Class A Peoria to Class AA Tennessee. Jokisch was taken in the 11th round last year out of Northwestern. He’s a native of downstate Virginia, Ill. At Peoria, he was 9-3 with a 2.96 ERA. The Cubs like his strike-throwing ability. Ubiquitous scout Stan Zielinski, who gets mentioned by GM Jim Hendry in nearly every trade the Cubs make for prospects, gets credit in the media guide for Jokisch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2011, 04:10:29 pm
Hernandez: 2-5, HR, 2 RBI, K

Amaya: 2-5, 2 RBI

Schlecht debut: 1-5, 3 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_15_cubrok_angrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 15, 2011, 05:13:22 pm
Schlect's debut was shlecht.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2011, 10:28:14 pm
Kirk: 5-1/3 IP, 4 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_15_cliafx_peoafx_1


Daytona and Tennessee idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2011, 10:31:13 pm
Candelario: 3-6, 2B, 3B, HR, 4 RBI, E

Je Baez: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI, 2 BB

Penalver: 2-5, 3B, 3 RBI



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_15_dphrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2011, 10:45:50 pm
Devoss: 1-2, 2B, RBI, 3 BB

Golden: 0-5, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_15_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2011, 11:31:55 pm
Flaherty makes 2 errors on the same play with the bases loaded to lose the game in the 9th.


Struck: 6 IP, 1 R

Coello: 2-0-1-1-1-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_15_iowaaa_tacaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 15, 2011, 11:34:37 pm
Move him to 2B.  ::)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2011, 11:38:01 pm
Sanchez: 1-5, K, 2 E (33)

Encarnacion: 2-4, HR, RBI, BB, SB, CS , ( 9 3B's, 25 SB in 115 AB's w/ DSL 1 )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_15_dcurok_ddirok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2011, 11:51:43 pm
Pretty nice 3-game stretch for Jeffrey Baez:

6-13, 3 2B, 2 HR, 5 RBI, 2 BB
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 16, 2011, 12:01:51 am
Just a quick look at a possible top ten prospects, now that the signings are complete.

1.  Jackson
2.  Baez
3.  Szcur
4.  Maples
5.  Vogelbach
6.  Flaherty
7.  Vitters
8.  Dunston
9.  Zych
10. Candelario

Of course, no ratings that includes players with zero appearances in pro ball can be too serious, but based upon what the Cubs must have thought of them in order to give the money they did, it may not be too far off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 16, 2011, 10:29:10 am
How in the heck does Vitters make a top 10 but McNutt does not?  How does Dunston Jr make it over McNutt? 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 16, 2011, 11:48:18 am
Because it is MY top ten, and that is the way I view them.

If you have one of your own, feel free to post it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 16, 2011, 02:26:07 pm
Because it is MY top ten, and that is the way I view them.

If you have one of your own, feel free to post it.

So what you're saying is I can't question how a guy whose at AA and was viewed as a top 3 prospect in this organization is all of a sudden not on your top 10, replaced by multiple people just signed and whom havent even had a chance to succeed/fail in rookie ball?  And Vitters OBP is .318 in AA.  I can't question you putting him at #7?   I can't question you making a list that seems to consider way too much the money these guys got?

Hmm.  Guess not.

If I were to make a list, I'm sure as heck putting guys like Beliveau in my top 10 over Dunston Jr..
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 16, 2011, 02:47:24 pm
Sure - you can question it.  I dropped McNutt out of my top ten because of the struggles he has had this year.  They may be because of nagging injuries that will go away over time.  Or they may be an indication that his command just isn't sufficient to progress any farther.

Last year, after the Garza trade, I had McNutt as my number two prospect.  When  he didn't perform as well as his stuff would have indicated, I dropped him down.  The reason why Vitters is rated higher than McNutt is because quire simply, Vitters performed better in AA than McNutt did.

The reason I put the newly signed players as high as I did is because of the money paid to sign them.  I don't think that the Cubs would have given first round money to Dunston if they didn't think he was worth first round money.  I place more faith in the Cubs scouting system in general, and in Wilken in particular, than you probably do.

Time will tell if any or all of them will be better than McNutt.  Almost certainly, some will fail.  But then, so might McNutt.

If it is of any value to you, here are my top 20 ratings


1   Jackson
2   Baez
3   Szcur
4   Maples
5   Vogelbach
6   Flaherty
7   Vitters
8   Dunston
9   Zych
10   Candelario
11   McNutt
12   Cruz
13   LaMehieu
14   Carpenter
15   Kirk
16   Clevenger
17   Castillo
18   Easterling
19   Ha
20   Zapata

I didn't post the second ten before because quite simply, they are in my opinion, much more arbitrary than the first ten.  You could probably reverse the second ten, and not be too far off the mark.  There just doesn't seem to be a very large spread between # 11 and # 20.  For that matter, there are quite a few in my next ten that could be placed in the second ten without a lot of controversy.

All the information is not in to make a final ranking.  After Maples, Dunston, etc report to the fall instructional league (some earlier, but not all), we will get reports on their actual game performances that will allow us to make more rational rankings.  Until then, this is how I see it.  I am perfectly happy to discuss any ranking with you.  It would be more helpful to me if you toned down your attitude a little bit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2011, 04:05:34 pm
Hernandez: 2-4 , ( hit in 20 of 21 )

Simpson: 2-2-1-1-1-0, HR


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_16_cinrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 16, 2011, 04:40:42 pm
I thought I asked simple questions about why you past McNutt over guys who were just drafted or have not performed well at all (Vitters).  I didn't see an attitude, but I guess it's irrelevant as you did.  In point of fact, I thought you took a poor attitude telling me its "Your list" and I should "make my own" if I had problems.  But it's not an issue ... this is just Cubs baseball.......Thanks for your list and explanation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 16, 2011, 04:49:44 pm
Don't be bitter!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 16, 2011, 04:55:19 pm
I thought I asked simple questions about why you past McNutt over guys who were just drafted or have not performed well at all (Vitters).  I didn't see an attitude, but I guess it's irrelevant as you did.  In point of fact, I thought you took a poor attitude telling me its "Your list" and I should "make my own" if I had problems.  But it's not an issue ... this is just Cubs baseball.......Thanks for your list and explanation.

I think you missed a post.  He explained himself well, and, for Dave, that's a feat in itself.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 16, 2011, 05:03:29 pm
I don't recall that explanation being there when I posted ... could be wrong .. but I didnt see it.  Doesn't matter ...water under bridge.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2011, 07:06:15 pm
Completed DSL 2 game from the end of July:


Candelario: 2-5, RBI, K - ( Today: 2-2, RBI ) - ( 16 for last 35, 13 RBI, 1.325 OPS )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_07_30_dchrok_dmlrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 16, 2011, 08:24:13 pm
Why is Candelario in the DSL if he was born in New York?  His age? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2011, 08:30:29 pm
Candelario signed out of the Dominican. My guess is his family is from there. Maybe they were living in New York when he was born but returned to their native country later.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 16, 2011, 08:40:02 pm
I believe he is the one that was born in the US but raised in the DR.  Don't know why his family moved there.  Chris is correct.  he was signed out of the DR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on August 16, 2011, 09:50:13 pm
Candelario received a pretty big signing bonus, right? So he was considered a top talent. But, most D.R. kids are scouted in terms of skills, as opposed to game action, is that right? Meaning that I wonder if the cubs are as shocked and pleased (hopefully) as I/we all are about his walk total. 

And as long as there is so much talk about the draft, given that he's only 17, one has to wonder how his skills would have played in a U.S. high school, and how high he might have been drafted .....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2011, 09:51:23 pm
500K for Candelario.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2011, 10:16:14 pm


Candelario: 1-4, SB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_16_dchrok_dmlrok_1


Ortega: 0-1, 4 BB, CS

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_16_dwsrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2011, 10:25:27 pm
Szczur: 3-5, 2B

Abreu still out.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_16_dbcafa_breafa_1


Vitters: 2-3, SF, 2 RBI, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_16_tenaax_jacaax_1


Peoria off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2011, 10:56:36 pm
Jackson: 2-5, 2 RBI, 2 K, Assist


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_16_iowaaa_slcaaa_1


Boise:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_16_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 16, 2011, 11:06:58 pm
Candelario received a pretty big signing bonus, right? So he was considered a top talent. But, most D.R. kids are scouted in terms of skills, as opposed to game action, is that right?en drafted .....

I don't think it is quite as bad as that.  My understanding is that over the years, it is becoming more common for young kids to be taken over by "agents" who do not allow them to play in competition, but instead train them in the "tools" that scouts use.  Thus, scouts have to evaluate them only on "showcase" practices rather than live game competition.  However, I still think that that is far from being "most" of the prospects.  I have heard that some teams refuse to deal with these "agents" and only sign those that came through the established leagues.

That said, I don't know what Candalerio's background is.  But even if he came through the established system and played organized ball, I doubt that it was of the caliber of that in most areas of the US.

I have never heard of any analysis of DR prospects as opposed to US draftee prospects, but given the size of the bonus, I assume the Cubs felt he was worth, in monetary terms, at least as much as a second round draftee.  It is possible, however, that DR prospects are paid higher than the same talent level in the draft, since there is competition over there, while there is none over here.

In short, I forgot what the question was, and don't know the answer anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 17, 2011, 08:18:37 am
$500K is a substantial bonus and wouldn't be given if they didn't think he had some tools and had a chance.  But I think with free agency the prices on interntional guys are substantially puffed relative to American draft slot.  We know that you have pay extra to sign an American high school player in the draft, by a large degree.  I believe the same is true, even more so, to sign a Dominican.  So my guess is that if Candelario is getting $500K, that may put him kind of in the same ballpark as recent signees like Lockhart ($395) or Gretzky ($375.)  As JR said, you gotta pay what it takes to get it done.  It takes more for a free agent than for a drafted HS kid, and it takes more for a drafted HS kid than for a comparably drafted college guy.  Basic economics. 

The younger the kid, the more uncertain.  And I think when uncertainty/risk increases, cost should decrease.  By accounts Candelerio is not a tall, speedy, 5-tool athlete.  All the usual risks applied (will he hit?  Will he become too slow?  Can he defend?  If he hits, will he hit HR's?), but without the 5-tool ceiling.  So I'd have to think that they spent as much as they did thinking he had a meaningful chance to become a really good hitter and become acceptable defensively.  Certainly the performance has reaffirmed that offensive evaluation. 

So I'm kind of thinking that whether his original draft equivalent was a 3rd or 5th or 10th round HS kid, it's still pretty significant.  No high school kid goes that high without having some talents that, if they work out, could make the guy into a really good prospect.  And if a HS junior had gotten 5th round draft evaluations and then came in and produced like Candelerio has, with that magic HR/K/BB profile that looks terrific, he'd move way up my list.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 17, 2011, 08:36:11 am
Just for fun, I checked Candelerio and the DSL leaders.  (That is a HUGE league, lots of teams and players down there.) 

He is in the top 20 in HR, and in the top 3-10 in batting average, slugging, OBP, and OPS. 

Certainly one of the best hitters in the league, but not higher than 3rd in any category. 

However, most of the guys ahead of him are in their 20's or at 19.  Of teenagers, he's got the highest batting average in the league.  In OPS and slugging, there are only two teenagers, both 19 and both more than 24 months older than him, ahead.  OBP similar. 

So of his age-group peers, the 17 and 18-year olds, he IS the best. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 17, 2011, 08:48:03 am
I think when uncertainty/risk increases, so too should cost.

Did you mean that as uncertainty/risk increases, the cost should decrease, or did you actually mean it the way you wrote it?  Anyone investing in anything would tell you that the way you wrote it is not the way real decisions are made.  If you meant that as the potential REWARD increases, then, yes the cost will, but not as risk increases.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 17, 2011, 08:56:00 am
In looking at Jackson and Vitters and Szczur (last 10 games)--

Jackson, last 10 games, BA .302, OPS .929, which sounds pretty good... but he also has 15 Ks in those 43 AB and only 3 walks.  His BABIP is a rather unsustainable .400.

Vitters: .333 and .803, but an 8:1 K to BB ratio (for the year it is 47:16)

Szczur: .214 and .536.... and that is AFTER his 3 for 5 yesterday.  3:2 K to BB ratio.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 17, 2011, 09:04:23 am
Did you mean that as uncertainty/risk increases, the cost should decrease, or did you actually mean it the way you wrote it?  Anyone investing in anything would tell you that the way you wrote it is not the way real decisions are made.  If you meant that as the potential REWARD increases, then, yes the cost will, but not as risk increases.
nope.  fixed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 17, 2011, 10:07:17 am
nope.  fixed.

I somehow did not think you could have had such a basic misunderstanding of the role of risk in cost.... some others here.... not so much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2011, 12:23:21 pm
Never overestimate a Chemist's understanding of the laws of supply and demand.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 17, 2011, 12:37:06 pm
Many likely understand it at least as well as most of the folks who pass themselves off as economists.

Trivia question....

Who was the last president we have had who could claim to be an economist by virtue of formal economic training?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 17, 2011, 01:10:35 pm
Bush I had an economics degree from Yale
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 17, 2011, 01:23:16 pm
Oh, Bush I.

I kept reading that as Bush, I had an economics degree from Yale.  Couldn't figure out what you were talking about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 17, 2011, 01:24:58 pm
BTW, on the claim that not taxing the rich leads to investment and more jobs...

I've always believed that.

I'm starting to lose it.

If it's true, those breaks have been in place for, what, 8 years?  They better start producing jobs pretty soon or the argument will be lost.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 17, 2011, 01:50:59 pm
It's not only the taxing of the rich.  It's the implementation of policy that the rich believe will inevitably increase their taxes.  In anticipation of that, the rich just hoard "cash".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 17, 2011, 02:24:24 pm
But soon I can see even some conservatives saying, hell with it.  If they aren't producing jobs and increasing the economy, might as well have the tax revenue.

Somebody's gotta get smart quick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 17, 2011, 02:25:16 pm
How did this get started in The Farm topic?

I'm sorry.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2011, 02:26:44 pm
How did this get started in The Farm topic?

Jes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 17, 2011, 02:39:16 pm
Some encouraging reports on Jackson and Flaherty:

http://projectprospect.com/article/2011/08/10/brett-jackson-and-ryan-flaherty-game-report
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2011, 02:44:27 pm
I don't know if this will work, but here is a video of DeVoss copying Wilber Marshall.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbJq5sPV3o0
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2011, 02:46:10 pm
Dang.  I'm a nerd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 17, 2011, 03:32:57 pm
Dang.  I'm a nerd.

Apparently, I'm not....Sad to say, I just had to google whom Wilber Marshall is. Though I did use the correct version of who/whom if that helps one's nerd status.  I think I did, anyway.  Actually, I have no idea.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 17, 2011, 03:49:44 pm
Dave- Thanks for posting that video.  The Tri-Cities catcher better learn about where, how, and if to block the plate--or he's going to get hurt. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2011, 03:50:55 pm
It's quite simple, Ray.  It goes "whom before Wilber, except after google".

Didn't you attend third grade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2011, 04:12:53 pm
Hernandez: 1-3, 2B, RBI, BB, K, CS

Andreoli debut: 2-3, BB, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_17_athrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 17, 2011, 05:26:04 pm
It's quite simple, Ray.  It goes "whom before Wilber, except after google".

Didn't you attend third grade.

All the swamps froze up in Louisiana that year, and the school boat couldn't make it to my house.  And not like I could walk because of the alligators.  We have gotten buses since then though.  Still no roads, however.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 17, 2011, 06:36:14 pm
Quote from: Iowa Cubs
Des Moines, IA - The Iowa Cubs have added C Carlos Romero to their active roster. C Welington Castillo remains on the roster, but has left the team to be present for the birth of his first child.

Romero joins Iowa from the Cubs rookie team in Arizona. In 15 games in Arizona, he batted .229 with no homers and three RBI. He also played one game for short-season Boise in June. The Cubs signed Romero as a non-drafted free agent out of Venezuela on February 22, 2007. The 21-year-old made his pro debut in the Venezuelan Summer League in 2007, played two years in the Dominican Summer League in 2008-09, and played in 17 games in Arizona last year.


This move has to be so the seasons of other more deserving catchers are not disturbed for only a couple days.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2011, 07:49:45 pm
The Cubs do some unusual emergency-type roster movements.  Earlier, they moved Na all the way to Tennessee before ultimately bringing him back to Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 17, 2011, 07:54:25 pm
Bush I had an economics degree from Yale

Right answer.

Reagan and Ford also had econ degrees.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2011, 08:04:26 pm
A new Phil Rogers article mentions that the Cubs have signed a LHP from Curacao named Christopher Pieters. I don't believe that's been reported here. Signing bonus was 350K.

The only thing I can find on him is an article in PDF format, but it's in Dutch. Anyone know Dutch?

http://networkedblogs.com/kzUJf
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2011, 08:09:32 pm
Google's translation is jumbled but there's something in there about Pieters being scouted by 18 teams.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2011, 08:24:26 pm
My browser only give me one sentence, but it says that since the age of six, Chris has loved baseball, and from the beginning he dreamed of being a professional baseball, which has driven him to fulfil this wish.

The headline merely says that Christopher Pieters travelled to (signed with) the Chicago Cubs.

The news report comes from the Netherland Antilles.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2011, 08:31:20 pm
Found it.  It merely says that the 16 year old left handed pitcher was scouted by 18 teams, but has decided that the Chicago Cubs are the best team to develop and utilize his talents.  He has participated in several local and international baseball events, including the Junior Latin American league in Monterrey, Mexico.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 17, 2011, 08:33:42 pm
...the Chicago Cubs are the best team to develop and utilize his talents.

LOL
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2011, 08:37:20 pm
Okay, thanks Dave. That's about all I can find as well. No age listed but he looks quite young.

Check that. I think he's 16. Don't know what else that number is supposed to represent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2011, 08:58:18 pm
Bour: 0-3, BB, 3 K  (6 for last 37, 1 BB, 1 extra-base hit )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_17_dbcafa_breafa_1


Je Baez: 2-5, 3B, RBI, SB, K, E

Penalver: 1-3, 2 BB, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_17_drgrok_dchrok_1


Ortega: 2-4, RBI, BB, K, 2 SB, CS

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_17_dcurok_dorrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2011, 10:14:28 pm
Vitters: 2-5


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_17_tenaax_jacaax_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_17_wisafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 17, 2011, 11:25:06 pm
Peoria is tied for the worst record in the MWL for the second half of the year.  That's not a very good team right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 18, 2011, 12:45:00 am
Brett Jackson 2-4, 3B, BB, 2k's

Flaherty 1-4, 3B

http://iowa.cubs.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t451&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_17_iowaaa_slcaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2011, 12:46:48 am
Devoss: 1-3, 2 BB, 2 K

Golden: 2-4, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_17_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2011, 04:17:32 pm
Hernandez: 1-4, SB, BB, K

Amaya: 0-3, 2 BB, 2 K, 2 E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_18_cubrok_mrnrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2011, 09:31:28 pm
Baez: 3-3, 2B, BB, SB, CS, Assist (Home)

Candelario: 0-2, 2 BB, HBP, E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_18_dchrok_dyarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2011, 09:54:36 pm
Geiger: 3-5, GW-ing RBI in 9th, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_18_wisafx_peoafx_1


Vitters: 0-4, K ,E

Beliveau: 2-1-0-0-0-3, SV

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_18_tenaax_jacaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2011, 10:53:24 pm
Abreu returns: 0-4, 3 K, Assist

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_18_breafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2011, 11:38:39 pm
Jackson: 2-5, 2B, SB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_18_iowaaa_slcaaa_1


Devoss: 2-4, BB, K

Wells: 3-1/3 IP, 8 R

Burke: 3-2/3 -0-0-0-2-6

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_18_boiasx_spoasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 19, 2011, 01:07:13 am
ArizonaPhil

LHP (ex-OF) Kyler Burke threw 3.2 IP of hitless/shutout ball with six strikeouts piggy-backing with Ben Wells at Boise tonight.

In his last ten games at Boise:
1.86 ERA, 1.00 WHIP, .171 Opp BA
29 IP, 18 H, 8 R (6 ER), 11 BB, 26 K

Despite his potential as a pitcher, Burke is unlikely to be added to the Cubs 40-man roster post-2011 because he hasn't pitched above short season ball and because he still has control lapses from time-to-time.

But the Cubs will probably add him to the 40 after next season (even if he hasn't made it past Daytona), because otherwise Burke can be a minor league free-agent (6YFA) post-2012, and I doubt that the Cubs will want to lose him.

BTW, Burke will probably attend Instructs next month, and he is the type of "mystery" pitcher scouts from the other MLB organizations will be watching closely to see how he develops. So if he pitches lights-out at Instructs it would not be inconceivable that Burke could get lifted in the December 2011 Rule 5 Draft.

Lefties who throw in the mid-90's are worth their weight in gold.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 19, 2011, 01:27:38 am
Then, based on today's closing price for gold and his listed weight on baseball-reference.com, he's worth in excess of $4.5 million.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 19, 2011, 08:36:45 am
Considering his performance to date, if there were a true FA market and he were entering it now, he might actually get that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 19, 2011, 09:34:12 am
And at 23, he might not even be the oldest player in the Cubs draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 19, 2011, 09:49:58 am
I'll take control lapses with a WHIP of 1.00. Could it really be worse than Marmol?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 19, 2011, 10:13:18 am
I'll take control lapses with a WHIP of 1.00. Could it really be worse than Marmol?

Considering that it is a WHIP of 1.00 in Boise, yes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 19, 2011, 03:36:48 pm
Thought this was a good article on Vitters....I still think he is an excellent prospect

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110815&content_id=23239786&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb

The problem for most young hitters is swinging and missing too much. That isn't an issue for Tennessee's Josh Vitters, though.

The third overall pick in the 2007 Draft uses his outstanding hand-eye coordination to put the ball in play with regularity. But sometimes the Chicago Cubs prospect would be better off keeping the bat on his shoulder.

"When you know you can hit a pitch, it's hard not to swing at it," Vitters said. "But I need to wait until I get a pitch I can drive. That's something I've been working on, and I think I'm making progress."

The proof is there for all to see. Vitters has batted .340 in the first 14 games of August, including a nine-game hitting streak in which he went 14-for-35 with 10 RBIs.

A 21-year-old until Aug. 27, the right-handed hitter is batting .284 with 24 doubles, two triples, 12 homers and 65 RBIs this season. He's drawn just 15 walks, though, to go with 47 strikeouts in 384 at-bats. It may not be the breakout season that Vitters and the Cubs had hoped for, but there are plenty of positive signs.

"I think it's been a good season," said Vitters, rated as the Cubs' No. 5 prospect by MLB.com. "We have a good team, and we've won a lot of games. I'm having fun and getting better, which is what you want to do."

Vitters' defense, even more than his hitting, is still a work in progress. He has shown he can play first base as well as third, but he has committed 22 errors overall.

"It's been nice to get a little change of scenery," Vitters said of his time at first. "But I want to play third base in the big leagues. That's what I'm working at."

Since he signed a bonus deal worth $3.2 million with the Cubs, it has always been Vitters' bat that was considered his ticket to Chicago. The Cubs liked Vitters so much that they took him over other high school hitters like Jason Heyward, Freddie Freeman and Mike Stanton. Those three, of course, are already in the Majors.

Vitters' progress was hampered by a broken hand that ended his season early a year ago with Tennessee. He had gotten off to a good start with the Smokies in 2010 after a quick promotion from the Florida State League but then slumped before being hit by a pitch.

After returning to play in the Arizona Fall League, Vitters hoped for a fast start back at Tennessee this season. But it was some of his teammates who started hot as the Smokies won the first-half title in the North Division.

For Vitters, it has been a slow and steady climb with a big final few weeks hopefully ahead.

"I see a lot of real good things with Josh," Smokies manager Brian Harper told the Knoxville News Sentinel after Vitters picked up a walk-off hit against Jacksonville on Thursday. "The kid works hard and he's making adjustments. I'm just real happy for him. I see a huge difference with him at the plate from April until now."

Vitters said in Spring Training with the Cubs that he hoped to be in Chicago before the end of the season. Is he still thinking like that?

"Absolutely," he said.

Before a possible September callup, though, Vitters is concentrating on a strong finish to the Southern League season and helping the Smokies win both halves in the North Division. If they do, he will likely be a big part of it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 19, 2011, 03:52:43 pm
"When you know you can hit a pitch, it's hard not to swing at it," Vitters said. "But I need to wait until I get a pitch I can drive. That's something I've been working on, and I think I'm making progress."

And how many years did it take this dolt to figure out that is what he needs to do?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 19, 2011, 04:49:09 pm
And how many years did it take this dolt to figure out that is what he needs to do?

It's irrelevant to me how long it takes him to figure it out, as long as he figures it out(yes, i realize figuring it out as a 35 y/o wouldn't be good) Most guys don't.  Sure, I'd prefer the sooner the better, but it's not going to make me root for him any less.  And, it's not like he's old; he doesn't turn 22 for another week. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 19, 2011, 05:03:32 pm
It's irrelevant to me how long it takes him to figure it out, as long as he figures it out(yes, i realize figuring it out as a 35 y/o wouldn't be good) Most guys don't.  Sure, I'd prefer the sooner the better, but it's not going to make me root for him any less.  And, it's not like he's old; he doesn't turn 22 for another week. 

Relevance is determined by what you are looking at.

If the question is, "Is Vitters smarter than a stump," then how long it takes him to figure it out is quite relevant.

If the question is whether Vitters is going to be bright enough to figure out what it is pitchers in the majors have started to do differently which has caused him to be slumping after he reached the majors, I would think it might also have some relevance.

Intelligence unquestionably does NOT mean a player will be able to hit worth a d*mn.  And there are also certainly some hitters who do well even though they are not quite bright.  But some degree of intelligence would seem to be of value... and whatever that degree of intelligence might be, it is increasingly looking as if Vitters lacks it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 19, 2011, 05:45:04 pm
I had a top 10 write up which ... well .. needless to say .. firefox screwed me.  I'm not typing it out again.  So, here's the short version:

1. Jackson - K'ing more than 30% at Iowa, but still has that outstanding OBP.  See you in Sept. w/ Lahair.
2. McNutt - not been good in AA.  Opponents hitting over .300.
3. Szcur - hit a wall in A+.  OBP below .300.
4. Baez - interesting to see if he pushes Castro to 3B later on (will Castro bulk up?).
5. Whitenack - might be a reach, but was dominating all levels.  Hope TJS and rehab go great.
6. Belivieau - seems to be anti-Gaub w/ walks.  Lefties hitting around .120, righties are below .200.  Would like to see what he does at AAA.
7. Flaherty - Ryan and DJ have both found AAA a struggle.
8. Lemahieu - will his D keep him from pushing Barney?
9. Vogelbach - hopefully more Matt Stairs or John Kruk than Harvey or Dopirak.
10. Clevinger - an OBP machine.  Is his D that poor, b/c Castillo, outside of this year, has never been much of hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 19, 2011, 05:58:52 pm
How's Hayden Simpson doing, bytheway.  Gosh, is that pick looking like a complete disaster.  His WHIP is 2+ in rookie ball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2011, 06:08:45 pm
Not that it matters, but Clevenger's had 5 stints in AA and 2 in AAA. I wouldn't put him in the top 25.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 19, 2011, 06:17:22 pm
Steve Clevenger is a good prospect.  Under a Hendry regime, he would never have been given a chance.  Maybe now, with the evil emperor gone, he'll get a fair shot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 19, 2011, 06:59:39 pm
Not that it matters, but Clevenger's had 5 stints in AA and 2 in AAA. I wouldn't put him in the top 25.

He's a catcher with a career BA of over .300 and an OBP near .370.   How are these not impressive numbers?  Maybe he's been in the minors this long to refine his catching, but his bat certainly warrants a top 10 spot if this franchise is going to start considering things other than power as important.

As a comparison, Castillo is one year younger, has a career average south of .270 and an OBP .335.  He's been in AA and AAA a bunch of times, too.  Maybe he's got things figured out now, but it looks like this might be classic Cubs in favoring the guy with larger home run numbers (though this is an assumption, b/c based on the things I've read where Castillo is supposedly a better defensive catcher, too).  Though, Clevenger has out OPS'd Castillo in their careers (.759 to .785).  And Clevenger was destroying AAA when Castillo was out (OPS over 1.00, small sample size of 86 ABs).

Bottom line, sooner or later, success should be rewarded.  Get Koyie Hill out of here already and see what Clevenger does at AAA and Castillo in Chicago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 19, 2011, 07:09:44 pm
Quote
LH John Gaub struck out two in a scoreless ninth and earned his seventh save last night. Gaub's previous career-high for saves was five between Tennessee (4) and Iowa (1) in 2009. Gaub has fanned 71 batters in 51 innings and leads the league with a 12.53 strikeouts per nine innings ratio. He is also second among relievers with a .201 opponents' batting average and tied for second with 11 holds.

Gaub has also had success cutting down on walks. 

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=453304 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=453304)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 19, 2011, 07:11:49 pm
Last night, I did the fifty yard dash through the Cubs minor league rosters (not counting the DSL rosters) to try to pick out who I thought were genuine major league prospects.  I didn't count any of this year's draftees.

I came up with 47 names, but the disappointing thing is how few potential rotation pitchers and everyday players there were in my list.  And this for a system that's supposedly on the upswing.

Let's hope the next GM does a better job with the minor league system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 19, 2011, 07:14:04 pm
High walks and high K's has always been Gaub's mo, so it's hard to believe he's doing anything but having a good stretch.  I'm not sure what to think about him.  I think that for a short relief guy, he'd be way too inconsistent.  Beliveau seems to be a better version of Gaub in that he rarely issues walks, though we've heard no real strong reports on his velocity or pitches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2011, 07:26:35 pm
Quote
He's a catcher with a career BA of over .300 and an OBP near .370.   How are these not impressive numbers?


He's a 25-year-old catcher who, again, has had 7 different stints at the top two levels. His track record at those levels is mixed. But if he can't put up decent numbers by now....

I don't mind giving Clevenger a shot at the backup position. I just don't think he's much of a prospect, certainly not top ten. Not even in this system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2011, 07:31:57 pm
There have been several reports of Beliveau's repertoire here: 90-93 mph, sharp slider, deceptive. Pretty similar to Gaub in fact, except Beliveau has suddenly become a prime strike-thrower.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 19, 2011, 07:36:28 pm
There have been several reports of Beliveau's repertoire here: 90-93 mph, sharp slider, deceptive. Pretty similar to Gaub in fact, except Beliveau has suddenly become a prime strike-thrower.

One issue that may be a factor with beliveau may be HR's.  7 in 49 innings in AA this summer.  May be a fluke, but might be one weakness in what's been an otherwise unbelievably awesome run. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2011, 07:59:45 pm
May be a fluke, but might be one weakness in what's been an otherwise unbelievably awesome run.

It's pretty hard to believe that 1/4 of all hits he's allowed are homers. I have to think that is somewhat flukey. That said, if he's going to have a 1.5 strikeout-to-baserunner ratio, I'll allow some homers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2011, 09:01:54 pm
Rhee: 6-2/3 -5-2-2-1-11  (59 K's last 47-1/3 IP)

Abreu: 0-4, 3 K  ( 0-8, 6 K's since return )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_19_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2011, 09:55:56 pm
Alcantara: 3-5, 3B, RBI, 2 E (39)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_19_wisafx_peoafx_1


McNutt: 7-7-2-2-4-5, 2 HB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_19_tenaax_jacaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2011, 11:23:47 pm
Jackson: 1-4, BB, 3 K

Rusin: 7-6-1-1-2-4

Maine: 1-0-0-0-0-3, SV  , 70 K's in 50-1/3 IP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_19_iowaaa_slcaaa_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2011, 11:32:00 pm
Golden: 0-4, 3 K

Wang: 4-2/3 -4-2-2-2-6

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_19_boiasx_spoasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 20, 2011, 12:19:25 am
DelValle reportedly hit 98 mph tonight
 
 
Peoria Chiefs
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Del Valle (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t443&t=p_pbp&pid=608166) (W, 3-2)5.14001702.95
Sosa (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t443&t=p_pbp&pid=467095) 1.20000103.97
Levitt (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t443&t=p_pbp&pid=543444) 2.02211006.16
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 20, 2011, 12:36:21 am
On the freeway?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 20, 2011, 12:37:57 am
Cactus - where was the 98 reported?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 20, 2011, 01:18:16 am
Nightengale also mentions Andrew Friedman (GM of the Rays) and Brian Cashman (GM of the Yankees) as possible candidates to replace Hendry.

Maybe he'll get one of those things right.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2011, 01:18:53 am
The 98 mph thing came from USA Today's Bob Nightengale. If that's via the same source who told him Hendry was staying....

The Peoria Star Journal only mentions DelValle mixing and commanding his pitches.

Edit: Sorry, Strikezone. Moved that post instead of editing. Now it's below yours.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2011, 02:23:36 am
Candelario: 1-3, K, E

Je Baez: 1-3, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_19_dchrok_dgirok_1


Ortega: 0-2, 2 BB, K, SB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_19_dcurok_drorok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 20, 2011, 03:38:21 am
I'd be shocked if Del Valle really hit 98.  He didn't come close to hitting that when I saw Peoria a month ago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 20, 2011, 06:55:38 am
I'd be shocked if Del Valle really hit 98.  He didn't come close to hitting that when I saw Peoria a month ago.

Could easily have been a slightly sore arm... or leg... or back... or neck.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on August 20, 2011, 07:54:24 am
Could easily have been a slightly sore arm... or leg... or back... or neck.

Or steroids.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 20, 2011, 08:59:11 am
I'd be shocked if Del Valle really hit 98.  He didn't come close to hitting that when I saw Peoria a month ago.
C'mon JR.  Radar guns are never wrong.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 20, 2011, 08:59:12 am
To explain a jump in velocity by attributing it to steroids, you first need to establish a baseline velocity.  One observation of a pitcher does not really do that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 20, 2011, 09:01:33 am
In all these posts about him hitting 98, none say whether it was in his car or on his motorcycle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2011, 04:34:40 pm
Amaya: 3-4, 3B, 3 RBI, SB

Shoulders: 0-3, BB, K

Lockhart: 2-5, 3 K

Rosario: 2-4, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_20_cubrok_pdrrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2011, 04:44:00 pm
Baez can't possibly be playing in the AFL. They must mean instructional.


Quote
CHICAGO -- Javier Baez, the Chicago Cubs' No. 9 pick in the June amateur draft, was in town on Saturday to sign his contract and tour Wrigley Field.

The 18-year-old Baez, a Puerto Rican native who played high school ball in Jacksonville, Fla., received a $2.66 million bonus as part of the $12 million the Cubs spent on all of this year’s draft picks, the most the organization has ever committed to a draft.

Baez, an infielder, said he’ll leave Sunday to prepare for the Arizona Fall League. He first said he didn’t have a timeline for when he wanted to reach the majors -- “I’m only 18,” he said -- but later said he hoped to be here in two years.

Baez, who addressed reporters as ‘sir’ and ‘ma’am’, said he feels comfortable playing anywhere in the infield. He was ranked as the seventh best overall position player in the draft by “Baseball America” and the fifth best high school player. He’s familiar with catcher Geovany Soto, who played with his older brother, Orlando, but does not know much about the Cubs. Even so, he said he was excited to get to work.

“I can’t even tell you (how excited I am) right now,” he said with a smile.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 20, 2011, 05:31:49 pm
I am quite certain that they meant the instructional league.  Many people use the terms indiscriminately, even though one is for much more advanced and experienced prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 20, 2011, 05:40:53 pm
Baez.... does not know much about the Cubs.

I wonder if the Cubs could have signed him if he did know much about them....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2011, 06:24:45 pm
The Dominican season is over. I hope Candelario gets to play some games at Boise or Mesa the last couple weeks.


Je Baez: 2-5, CS, Assist

Candelario: 0-3, RBI, BB, 2 K, E

Garcia: 3-3-2-2-2-3  ( 20 IP, 11 H, 7 BB, 25 K since break )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_20_dmerok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 20, 2011, 07:03:45 pm
The Cubs jumped 21 year old Andreoli up to Peoria.  That seems to be an age appropriate league for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 20, 2011, 07:12:50 pm
That's a sign they consider him a non-prospect, an organizational player.

Maybe he'll prove them wrong.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 20, 2011, 07:16:31 pm
The Cubs jumped 21 year old Andreoli up to Peoria.  That seems to be an age appropriate league for him.
Due to Smaily Borges on going on the DL with a strained calf.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 20, 2011, 08:28:09 pm
Iowa up 4-1 after 4 . Brett Jackson having quite a night 3-3 at the plate with a 2B, 2R and in the field he's thrown a runner out at the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2011, 10:07:08 pm
Vitters: 0-4, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_20_tenaax_jacaax_1


Geiger: 1-4, HR, RBI, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_20_peoafx_cedafx_1


Daytona:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_20_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 20, 2011, 10:16:19 pm
Wow-- LHP Jeff Beliveau is really posting some phenomenal numbers at AA, what type of prospect is this kid ?
In 66.2 innings the kid has an era of 1.35 betwen Daytona and Tennessee and 1.64 era in 39 appearences in Double-A by itself. Am I missing something or is this kid the real deal ? 

Wait there's more, the guy has 65 strike-outs in 49 plus innings at Double-A and 85 K's for the entire year , his numbers are fantastic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 20, 2011, 10:19:39 pm
He's probably a viable LOOGY, but he's had some HR problems at AA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 20, 2011, 10:25:32 pm
Thks-- I missed the HR's he had given up which are 7 at Double-A. I wonder if he's a fly-ball pitcher ?

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=542924
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 20, 2011, 10:44:42 pm
Link says 0.61 FB/GB ratio.  Flyball pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2011, 11:26:24 pm
Three of the homers against Beliveau came in one inning. I'm still not worried about that stat.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2011, 11:32:51 pm
Jackson: 3-5, 2B, 2 K, 2 Assists

Struck: 6-5-3-1-1-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_20_orhaaa_iowaaa_1


Devoss: 0-1, 4 BB, K, SB, PO,   ( 19 BB last 45 PA's )

Golden: 0-4, BB, K   (2 for last 21)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_20_boiasx_spoasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2011, 11:45:53 pm
Did the Cubs really draft a guy who has a 30% walk rate through 25 games?

Was there an audio malfunction during the third round? Maybe they said Heaton Moss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 20, 2011, 11:46:33 pm
DeVoss with 4 more walks?  Sounds like he read the Ricketts comments about him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 21, 2011, 09:51:59 am
Hey, Craig, I don't know if you noticed, but a team from Rapid City made it to the LL WS.  I have a cousin coaching that team, but I thought it was amazing that any team from the Dakotas could ever make it that far.  Holy Smoke, RC doesn't have that many people or that long a season.  Great experience for those folks.  They've been eliminated, but it took teams from Georgia and the Caribbean to do it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 21, 2011, 11:07:53 am
Hey, Craig, I don't know if you noticed, but a team from Rapid City made it to the LL WS.  I have a cousin coaching that team, but I thought it was amazing that any team from the Dakotas could ever make it that far.  Holy Smoke, RC doesn't have that many people or that long a season.  Great experience for those folks.  They've been eliminated, but it took teams from Georgia and the Caribbean to do it.

I thought I'd heard some reference to that on the radio, but I thought I'd mis-heard.  That's pretty cool. 

I'm still kind of disappointed the Cubs didn't sign the kid from Fargo.  I'll be interested to track how good he ends up being for NDSU, and whether he's still a draftable prospect after three years in college, or if he's able to crack the top 10 rounds then. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 21, 2011, 11:09:44 am
Three of the homers against Beliveau came in one inning. I'm still not worried about that stat.

Thanks for sharing that.  That's helpful. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 21, 2011, 11:23:25 am
I haven't been paying attention, but Wilson Contreras has batted 3rd the last couple of nights.  Has that been happening for long?  He was a dollar prospect, and he's heated up some lately (hitting .400-something over last ten games).  And since Boise doesn't really have any good hitter to put into the 3rd spot, somebody needs to bad 3rd without that necessarily being an indicator that they think he's a big prospect. 

But I'm still hoping that he's got some scout-attractive swing and projection, and that perhaps he's making some progress.  His splits are all pretty worthless, though:  no power (9 XBH in 49 hits), no speed, low walks, and not an exceptionally low K-rate either.  I think he'd need to be another pure projection guy, that with time perhaps his hitting and selectivity will improve, and in time he'll grow into power.  If he was a power guy, his K-rate would seem just fine. 

Pin-Chieh Chen has 19 XBH out of 65 hits.  Not powerful, but if he'd been scouted as a power-projection prospect, I'd have thought that might be OK for a 19-year-old guy who at 6'1" might have the levers to project playable power.  Hopefully he'll surprise and grow into some usable power in due time. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 21, 2011, 11:48:40 am
What do you mean "that long a season"?  The snow was almost completely gone by July this year, and it has only snowed twice this month.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 21, 2011, 12:30:30 pm
ArizonaPhil, when asked to compare Pena to Jackson.

Brett Jackson is like Carlos Pena in the sense that he is a very patient hitter who is willing to go deep into the count and take a walk (or get called out on strikes), but he is not like Pena in that he is a fast & aggressive baserunner who steals bases and who can score from 1st on a double and advance from 1st to 3rd or score from 2nd on a single to the outfield. B-Jax is also more of a slash/spray hitter than dead-pull, and he plays a "crash & burn" style of CF defense like Reed Johnson or Sam Fuld.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 21, 2011, 12:32:46 pm
It's an interesting question, to me at least, who's a better third-base prospect right now, Vitters or Lake. They're on the same team, although Lake spent half the season at Daytona. Lake is about 8 mos. younger. Both have 12 home runs. Again allowing for the Daytona component of Lake's numbers, both are hitting .280 with an SLG around .440. Both have a lot to learn as hitters. Lake much better on defense and on the bases, and could play any infield position.

ArizonaPhil

VA PHIL: I would say Junior Lake is the better 3B prospect of the two, but I say that only because I believe Josh Vitters is best-suited to play corner OF and should be moved to either LF or RF. Actually Lake probably profiles as an offensive-first supersub.

Lake has a plus-arm, plus-range, plus-speed, HR power, and the ability to steal bases, but has always been EXTREMELY aggressive at the plate and lacking the ball-handling skills you would want to see in a middle-infielder (basically the exact same skill-set as Shawon Dunston, Sr).

If it wasn't that the Cubs already have a bevy of CF prospects (Brett Jackson, Jae-Hoon Ha, Matt Szczur, Taiwan Easterling, and Pin-Chieh Chen), I would say Lake should be moved to CF to take advantage of his speed, range, arm, and athleticism, because he plays SS with the touch of a bull in a china shop.

Back in 2008, the Cubs had Starlin Castro, Junior Lake, Marwin Gonzalez, and Gian Guzman together at Extended Spring Training, and to get them all enough playing time, the quartet was moved around to different positions, with Castro playing SS-2B-3B (best positions were 2B #1 and SS #2), Lake playing SS-2B-3B-CF (best positions were 3B #1 and CF #2), M. Gonzalez playing 3B-SS-2B-1B-LF (best positions were 3B #1 and SS #2), and Guzman playing 3B-SS (best position was 3B).

No question Lake had the best natural tools of the four. He also was the most erratic (in the field, on the bases, and at the plate, making lots of errors, running into outs, and striking out with regularity). But three years later it appears that Lake might possibly be finally putting it together, and could be about ready to realize his enormous potential.

While Castro is the better hitter, the better SS, and the better student of the two, Lake is faster, has more power, more range, and a stronger arm. If he played football, Lake would probably be a free safety.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2011, 04:35:35 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 2 K

Coello: 1-1-0-0-1-2 ,  ( August: 13 IP, 5 H, 5 BB, 19 K, 2 R )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_21_orhaaa_iowaaa_1


Shoulders: 1-4, 2B, K

Amaya: 1-4, 3B, 3 E

Schlecht: 2-4, RBI, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_21_mrnrok_cubrok_1


Kirk: 4-2/3 IP, 6 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_21_peoafx_cedafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 21, 2011, 04:43:44 pm
I haven't been checking, and I know the rookie-league box-scores aren't always very accurate.  But today's box shows Rosario gunning both attempted base-stealers, and putting a guy out at 1B as well.  He's got 3 HR and is slugging over .500.  If he's got the arm to limit the running game besides, that's a pretty good package for a kid who turned 18 less than a month ago.  That doesn't mean he can block a slider or call a pitch, of course.  But I'm pretty encouraged. 

Schlecht has taken 3 walks in his first 15 AB.  So perhaps he's not going to be a total hacker.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 21, 2011, 07:05:03 pm
Matt Szczur has homered twice for Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2011, 07:12:27 pm
Vitters: 1-5, 2 K , ( Thrown out at 2nd on a 1B in the 11th down a run; would've been 1st & 3rd )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_21_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2011, 07:52:52 pm
Szczur: 2-5, 2 HR, 2 RBI

Antigua: 6-3-3-3-3-5  (After 1st: 5-0-0-0-1-3


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_21_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 21, 2011, 09:08:06 pm
Szczur has been interesting.  That's 9 HR's now on the season.  I think Keith Law has made Juan Pierre comparisons, but like all comps no two guys are the same.  Clearly Szczur and Pierre share speed and CF, and Szczur has an ever lower walk-rate than Pierre. 

But 9 HR's is a non-trivial difference.  Obviously he's already rather well-built for a kid who just turned 22, so I'm not sure there's much physical projection left.  But some of effective HR-hitting is skill, too.  It's possible that he'll better learn how to hit for power with more experience?

His Daytona profile is kind of like the Corey Patterson that I remember from his Cubs days (Szczur was at .287 OBP coming into today, which isn't too much below Corey's .293 OBP during his 6 years with the Cubs). 

But I think he's also hit in some bad luck, maybe?  His K-rate is only 13%.  For a guy who's so fast, his BABIP is only like .272 at Daytona, I think.  You'd think a guy with his speed and contact skills should have a much better BABIP, and if he had a more reasonable BABIP his average should go up and his OBP should go easily past .300. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 21, 2011, 09:24:22 pm
I haven't been checking, and I know the rookie-league box-scores aren't always very accurate.  But today's box shows Rosario gunning both attempted base-stealers, and putting a guy out at 1B as well.  He's got 3 HR and is slugging over .500.  If he's got the arm to limit the running game besides, that's a pretty good package for a kid who turned 18 less than a month ago.  That doesn't mean he can block a slider or call a pitch, of course.  But I'm pretty encouraged. 

There wasn't much reported on him when he was drafted, but here is what I have.

ROUND 6 (189): Neftali Rosario, C (Puerto Rico Baseball Academy - Gurabo, PR)
R/R, 5'11, 193, 17 years old
COMMENT: Polished receiver with a strong arm... Started to show HR power this season...

Very little to go on, but taking a 17 year old catcher in the 6th round indicates that they thought rather highly of him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2011, 10:05:27 pm
Golden: 0-4, K   (2 for last 25)

DeVoss: 0-4, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_21_boiasx_yakasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 21, 2011, 11:14:09 pm
Keith Law is dead wrong on Matt Szczur but he refuses to admit it.  He continues to call Szczur's swing "slappy" and says that he's got no power.

Didn't Pierre go all the way thru the minors without a homer?

Obviously the lack of walks is troubling but Juan Pierre?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 22, 2011, 12:54:33 am
Quote
SEVIERVILLE — Josh Vitters has made a habit of late-inning heroics for the Tennessee Smokies this August, but Sunday night at Smokies Park, a base-running mistake may have cost his team a win. Vitters tried to stretch a blooping single into a double in the bottom of the 11th inning and was caught at second, potentially costing the Smokies at least one run in a 3-2 extra-inning loss to the Southern League North-leading Chattanooga Lookouts.

"Vit was trying to be a little too aggressive and got thrown out at second," Smokies manager Brian Harper said. "You can't fault the kid for being aggressive, but it didn't work out for us."

...


In the bottom of the inning, Jae-Hoon Ha sent a line drive single into center field to put the tying run on base for Tennessee. Vitters followed it up with a short, arcing base hit that bounced into the shallow outfield. Ha made it to third, but Vitters failed to reach second safely, recording the second out of the inning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 22, 2011, 02:14:57 am
Quote
Daytona starter Jeff Antigua had a rough start, yielding three runs in the first inning, but settled down to retire 15 straight. He struck out five, walked three and allowed three hits in six innings.

"Antigua showed a lot of class for a young guy," Bailey said of the 21-year-old southpaw. "He comes out of the chute and gives up three runs, and then gets the next 15 guys in a row. It ended up being a big plus outing to me."

The Cubs got back in the game with the help of two solo home runs by center fielder Matt Szczur, who also made two diving catches in the outfield.

"Szczur had an outstanding game," Bailey said. "Not only with the two home runs, but he also hit another ball hard and made two diving catches."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 22, 2011, 08:56:50 am
I think for the moment, the only thing really obviously wrong with Szczur is that he doesn't take any walks.  Like Barney and Vitters, the OBP isn't much higher than the BA.  Szczur's Daytona IsoD is worse than Vitters, of course.  (Because Vitters has a quick bat and crowds the plate, he's always gotten some HBP IsoD in addition to his walks.  I think his close-to-plate stance may also contribute to his ability to swing at balls that are off the outside corner, that normal hitters would lay off of because they couldn't reach them if they tried....) 

But other than being a sub-Vitters sub-Pierre IsoD guy, Szczur seems a relatively perfect player.  Low K's, great defense, good speed and an occasional SB, some HR power.  OK, obviously if he was more perfect he'd have more HR power.  But the anti-walk thing is really the only meaningful fault I see in his game. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 22, 2011, 11:38:43 am
Craig - Curt told me that it is not proper to say "more perfect".

You should say "more perfecter".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 22, 2011, 12:21:30 pm
Well, either that or most perfectest.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 22, 2011, 01:53:51 pm
The education of our children is in capable hands.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 22, 2011, 01:56:05 pm
Vogelbach playing DH today at Mesa.  And he didn't even strike out in his first at bat.

He flew out to center field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on August 22, 2011, 01:58:22 pm
To me Clevenger is not a top 10 prospect...Top 15? yes maybe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 22, 2011, 02:13:21 pm
Peoria  - Dallas Beeler is back and RHP Yoanner Negrin has been added

Frank Del Valle has been promoted to Daytona.

Daniel Berlind goes to Iowa from Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 22, 2011, 02:55:24 pm
Vogelbach looking good.  He didn't strike out until his second at bat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 22, 2011, 03:24:34 pm
Vogelbach with three at bats, and he only struck out on one of them.

Fly to center and fly to left.

Has he played anywhere since the high school season ended?  I haven't seen anything about it one way or the other.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 22, 2011, 04:01:04 pm
No, Vogelbach hasn't played since his season ended.

*

Amaya: 2-4, CS

Vogelbach: 1-4, K

Shoulders: 1-4, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_22_diarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 22, 2011, 04:13:35 pm
There is nothing like a small sample size.  But it is interesting to me that Vogelbach hit the ball three times, once to center and twice to left. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 22, 2011, 04:55:20 pm
Scott Maine (ankle) and Justin Berg (elbow) are on the DL at Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 22, 2011, 09:47:17 pm
Jackson: 2-4, 2B, RBI, SB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_22_orhaaa_iowaaa_1


Vitters: 3-3, 2B, HBP

Jokisch: 6-3-1-1-2-10

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_22_cngaax_tenaax_1


Geiger: 2-4, RBI, K, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_22_peoafx_cedafx_1


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2011, 12:11:20 am
Let's hope AzPhil is off in his comparison of Vogelbach:


Quote
Famous for winning the 2010 International Power Showcase at Chase Field in Phoenix with a towering 508-ft HR, the 18-year old lefty swinging Vogelbach--who gave up a chance to play college ball at the University of Florida when he signed with the Cubs last week--flied out to the warning track in right-centerfield in his first pro AB, struck out swinging (and looked bad doing it) his second time up, popped out to left in his 3rd AB, and grounded an opposite-field single through the 5.5 hole in his final AB in the bottom of the 9th. He reminds me a bit of ex-KC Royals 1B Bob Hamelin. 

Both Cubs 2011 25th round pick Rock Shoulders ($294K signing bonus = "4th round money") and Vogelbach ($1.6M signing bonus) were in the lineup (Shoulders played 1B), hitting 3-4. Like Vogelbach, Shoulders also went 1-4, ripping a single down the LF line in the 7th. Shoulders is bottom-heavy and can barely run, stopping at 1st base on what should have been an easy double. The switch-hitting Shoulders led Florida JUCO in HR this season, and clearly has plus-power from both sides of the plate (his rope-single down the LF line today was hit RH).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 23, 2011, 12:51:48 am
Quote from: ChiefsVoice at NSBB on Del Valle recent velocity controversy
He is 88-92. Our scoreboard lights were out on the bottom left hand corner Friday night making the 8 in 88 look like a 9 and it got tweeted out. An honest mistake by someone who had never been to our stadium before and didn't know that the lights on the radar gun are broken.  Fastest I have heard he has legitimately hit this season is 93-4. That said he was very impressive in his short time with the Chiefs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2011, 12:59:22 am
DeVoss: 4-6, 2B, 2 RBI, SB, CS, K  (Played CF)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_22_boiasx_yakasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 23, 2011, 02:54:33 am
There is nothing like a small sample size.  But it is interesting to me that Vogelbach hit the ball three times, once to center and twice to left. 

No bat speed...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 23, 2011, 06:00:57 am
Release him
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 23, 2011, 10:06:28 am
Andrew Cashner starts for the Smokies tonight.  The game will be live on MILB.tv at 6:15 Chicago time
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 23, 2011, 11:34:36 am
DeVoss: 4-6, 2B, 2 RBI, SB, CS, K  (Played CF)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_22_boiasx_yakasx_1

Why do I feel like this is the next guy to be traded for a veteran?  Someone who has more walks than K's?  Inconceivable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bistro on August 23, 2011, 01:50:39 pm
Hi folks,
Has anybody been working on a revised or updated Top 30 list as the season has progressed?  I'd be curious to see what people around here think now that we are through a subtantial portion of the season.  Secondary questions are who has raised their stock the most and who has struggled the most? 
Thanks, hope everybody has been doing well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 23, 2011, 03:11:04 pm
Bryan LaHair has four doubles for Iowa this afternoon.  The team has ten doubles as they lead Oklahoma City 14-6.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: albqcubs on August 23, 2011, 03:33:14 pm
But LeHair cannot do that at the major league level (Again, purple impaired)!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 23, 2011, 03:51:53 pm
But LeHair cannot do that at the major league level (Again, purple impaired)!
Beaten out by LeTortoise again, I guess.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on August 23, 2011, 03:57:37 pm
gold
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2011, 04:48:42 pm
Amaya: 2-4, 2 SB, BB, K, E

Vogelbach: 1-5, 2B, 2 RBI, SB (3rd), K, E

Shoulders: 1-3, 2B, BB

Zych: 1-1-1-0-1-2


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_23_cubrok_diarok_1


14 runs on 17 hits for Iowa and Jackson didn't play.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_23_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 23, 2011, 05:16:45 pm
But LeHair cannot do that at the major league level (Again, purple impaired)!

Well... he can't.

So long as he's left in Iowa, he cannot do that at the major league level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 23, 2011, 05:50:37 pm
Vogelbach stole a base?  Maybe the apocalypse is upon us.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 23, 2011, 06:31:39 pm
Andrew Cashner struck out the first batter he faced.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 23, 2011, 06:43:32 pm
Was he immediately removed with an injury?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 23, 2011, 06:50:49 pm
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Cashner (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t553&t=p_pbp&pid=488768) 0.232202027.00
Searle (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t553&t=p_pbp&pid=545989) 1.11001003.42
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 23, 2011, 07:26:47 pm
Ready to join the big club!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2011, 10:34:01 pm
Vitters: 0-3, BB, PO

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_23_cngaax_tenaax_1

Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_23_peoafx_cedafx_1

Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2011, 12:49:06 am
Piece on Tim Wilken post-Hendry:

http://www.csnchicago.com/08/23/11/Even-without-Hendry-Wilken-wants-to-rebu/landing_insider_mooney_loud3r.html?blockID=553362&feedID=619
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2011, 02:31:58 am
DeVoss: 4-4, BB, HBP, E

Golden: 0-3, BB, 2 K,   (2 for last 28)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_23_boiasx_yakasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: albqcubs on August 24, 2011, 06:25:23 am
How does DeVoss get on base five times and not get an SB attempt?  Really?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: albqcubs on August 24, 2011, 06:27:20 am
LeHair has had a truly remarkable season and will be the Cubs minor leagure POY.  Now, he gets to join the big boys and get butt rot on the bench.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 24, 2011, 08:42:18 am
Two games in a row with four hits for DeVoss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 24, 2011, 08:54:44 am
Quote from: Bleacher Nation
Last night, Chicago Cubs pitcher Andrew Cashner saw his first professional action in quite some time as he recovers from twin rotator cuff strains in his throwing shoulder.

Cashner, pitching the first inning for the AA Tennessee Smokies, struck out the first two batters he faced before giving up three straight hits and being pulled after throwing 23 pitches. Cashner was on a 25 to 30 pitch limit.

Reader Brandon was at the game and said that Cashner’s line is deceiving, and the performance was much more impressive. One of the three hits was solidly struck, while the other two were unlucky cheapies. Better, Brandon says Cashner looked very good out there.

Most importantly, Cashner left the start feeling good, and multiple reports have him hitting the high 90s with his fastball.

Cashner will get a few more one/two inning starts before likely returning to the Cubs in September, and doing some work out of the pen.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 24, 2011, 01:59:16 pm
That's pretty nice to have some good news, both the Cashner report and DeVoss. 

With Cashner I suspect first time out there's a bunch of adrenalin, and you've been spending months preparing your arm for the outing.  Will be interesting how well he can bounce back, and whether his arm will hold up once he's really throwing repeatedly at competitive game speed and get-them-out intensity rather than throwing for the rehab purpose only. 

I hadn't given it much thought, but DeVoss is a switch hitter.  He's over .300 both ways, and over .800 OPS both ways.  Small sample, so with only 24 AB versus LHP who knows.  Zero XBH hitting RH, but six out of his 20 hits hitting left-handed are double. 

Will be interesting to see how the 2B vs CF business goes for him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 24, 2011, 02:11:25 pm
Even if DeVoss can't play second, you have to be encouraged by his (very) early success.

If he continues to be a plus offensively, they'll find somewhere for him.  They already know he can play in the outfield, so that's good.

I have to think that the Cubs are hoping he can turn himself into an Eric Young type of player down the road.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 24, 2011, 02:36:01 pm
Delino.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2011, 03:16:39 pm
From Today's BA chat with Callis:

Quote
Dan (Lansing): How good is the Cubs system right now? I know there is not a lot in the way of impact player's but a lot to like considering the influx of IFA's and the last 2 draft's so a ton of depth right?


Jim Callis: Solid depth, middle-of-the-pack system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2011, 08:49:45 pm
Szczur: 0-3, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_24_dbcafa_tbyafa_1


Szczur: 1-4, K, Assist

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_24_dbcafa_tbyafa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2011, 09:18:43 pm
Ha: 3-3, 2 BB, SB, CS

McNutt: 6-9-3-3-0-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_24_cngaax_tenaax_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_24_qcsafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2011, 10:24:26 pm
Jackson: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 2 K

Coello: 2-1/3 -1-0-0-0-5, SV   (August: 15-1/3 IP, 6 H, 5 BB, 24 K)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_24_iowaaa_orhaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2011, 11:21:21 pm
DeVoss: 1-4, 2 RBI, SB, BB, 2 K

Wang: 6-5-1-1-1-8

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_24_boiasx_skvasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 25, 2011, 07:31:27 am
Wilson Contreras is hitting .369 in August, after a .195 July. 

1 walk in 65 AB this month.  In June, he took 8 walks in 47 AB, which I recall being encouraged about. 

Perhaps reflects the randomness of small samples, perhaps how the pitching changes in NWL from June to August.  Not many new draftees pitching there in June, and those that do are probably late-round guys or higher-round guys that haven't pitched much for a few weeks and trying to rediscover their control. 

But my also reflect that Contreras didn't feel like he could hit and walk at the same time. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 25, 2011, 07:57:18 am
Perhaps reflects the randomness of small samples, perhaps how the pitching changes in NWL from June to August.

Do the stats of most other players reflect similar changes?  If so the difference might well be a change int he quality of pitching.  If not, it is more likely statistical noise coming from small sample sizes.

But my also reflect that Contreras didn't feel like he could hit and walk at the same time. 

It may reflect more than his feeling that he can't.  It may reflect that he can't.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 25, 2011, 03:21:44 pm
Vogelbach with his first professional home run today.  The home run to right field, along with a fly out to left and a single to left, so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 05:43:37 pm
Vogelbach doubled to left to start a 5-run 7th and later drew his first pro walk before being lifted for a pinch-runner.

Wild game to say the least.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 06:04:08 pm
Mesa loses 17-15 in 12 innings when Luis Villalba gets called for consecutive balks with a runner at 3rd.

Can't recall that ever happening. Villalba was subsequently ejected as you might expect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 06:05:40 pm
Vogelbach: 3-5, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, BB


Shoulders: 1-6, 2B, RBI, BB (IBB), 2 K


Schlecht: 1-3, 4 BB, K, Assist


Martin: 2-5, SF, 2 RBI, BB, 2 K, SB, PO


Jensen: 1-0-0-0-0-1


Scott: 1-2/3 -3-3-3-1-1


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_25_giarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 25, 2011, 06:45:21 pm
Except for his home run to right, I believe Vogelbach hit everything to the opposite field.  And I believe that more than half of his total at bats went to left field in the previous games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 25, 2011, 06:50:58 pm
Pretty good catch by Jae-Hoon Ha

http://www.micubs.com/resources/view/great-catch-by-jae-hoon-ha (http://www.micubs.com/resources/view/great-catch-by-jae-hoon-ha)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 25, 2011, 07:13:35 pm
Vogelbach doubled to left to start a 5-run 7th and later drew his first pro walk before being lifted for a pinch-runner.

Wild game to say the least.

Why are they pinch-running for the wild bull?  He stole a base earlier this week.  Let him run!

Maybe he'll burn some calories.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 07:38:53 pm
the wild bull

I prefer "Big Money".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 25, 2011, 07:45:33 pm
Except for his home run to right, I believe Vogelbach hit everything to the opposite field.  And I believe that more than half of his total at bats went to left field in the previous games.

Hey, davep, you've made comments like this a couple of times.  I'm curious if you think this is a good thing or a bad thing.

Are you saying that Vogelbach has a slow bat?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 25, 2011, 07:58:23 pm
I would guess that it indicates he goes with the pitch instead of trying to pull everything, but when he has a pitch he can pull, the HR to RF would indicate that he can.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 25, 2011, 08:05:36 pm
I wouldn't think a guy with a slow bat, no matter how big, could hit a 508 ft home run. Not saying it's exceptional like Baez's, but I wouldn't think it's slow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 25, 2011, 08:11:29 pm
I think going the other way is a good thing that reflects a more complete and more mature hitter, and is less likely to be an all-or-nothing boom-or-bust guy. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 25, 2011, 08:23:51 pm
In this era of video tape, a deal pull hitter gets exposed very quickly. If we're lucky, Big Money has already learned the importance of hitting the ball where it's pitched. If the pitcher lets one of his inside pitches get in the strike zone or hangs one in the middle of the plate, take a full cut. Otherwise, focus more on putting the ball in play than putting it in the next county.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 08:27:58 pm
Watch any of Vogelbach's video clips. The last thing that can be said about him is that he has slow bat speed. He whips the bat through the air like it's made of plastic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 25, 2011, 09:03:01 pm
Hey, davep, you've made comments like this a couple of times.  I'm curious if you think this is a good thing or a bad thing.

Are you saying that Vogelbach has a slow bat?

I am saying that it is unusual.  Most sluggers pull the ball more often than not.

I have no opinion on whether it is good or bad at this point.  At the very least, it means that he does not have to pull the ball in order to hit it.  I suppose it could mean that he has a slow bat, but I think that would be a jump to conclude that right now.

If anything, I would think it is a good sign, since it indicates that he is not trying to pull outside pitches.  It could also explain his relatively small strikeout rate for a slugger.

I made the above post before I read those of Jes and Craig.  I agree that it is a good sign for a slugger to hit the ball where it is pitched.  It is more difficult to pitch to him.  As Craig says, it seems to affirm some of the comments about him, that he is not only a slugger, but also a good hitter.  If he succeeds, he might not only hit for power, but also for a good average.

Of course, he has yet to face a good breaking ball.  Time will tell.  But so far, I see no reason not to be optimistic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 25, 2011, 09:16:29 pm
I am saying that it is unusual.  Most sluggers pull the ball more often than not.

I have no opinion on whether it is good or bad at this point.  At the very least, it means that he does not have to pull the ball in order to hit it.  I suppose it could mean that he has a slow bat, but I think that would be a jump to conclude that right now.

If anything, I would think it is a good sign, since it indicates that he is not trying to pull outside pitches.  It could also explain his relatively small strikeout rate for a slugger.

I made the above post before I read those of Jes and Craig.  I agree that it is a good sign for a slugger to hit the ball where it is pitched.  It is more difficult to pitch to him.  As Craig says, it seems to affirm some of the comments about him, that he is not only a slugger, but also a good hitter.  If he succeeds, he might not only hit for power, but also for a good average.

Of course, he has yet to face a good breaking ball.  Time will tell.  But so far, I see no reason not to be optimistic.

OK, like I said, I was just curious as to why you commented on it a couple of times.

It is very early, which is why I wondered.

Thanks for clarifying.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 09:19:22 pm
Rhee: 6-1/3 -6-1-1-1-8 , 8-3 GO/FO  ( Last 3 apps: 19 IP, 3 BB, 25 K, 1.42 ERA )


Abreu: 0-3, 2 K  ( 1-22 w/ 10 K's since return from injury )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_25_dbcafa_tbyafa_1


Beeler: 2-1-0-0-0-2   (First app since June 2 after unknown injury)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_25_qcsafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 25, 2011, 09:43:21 pm
Strike - one last comment.  In short season ball, and especially Mesa, I have always felt that the bad signs are probably more important than the good signs.  A guy that excels in short season ball may do so simply because the pitchers are not good enough to find and exploit his weaknesses.  So I try not to get too optimistic.  But if a guy struggles in Mesa, that could be a warning that something is wrong.  I also try to notice things that are out of the ordinary, as with the case of Vogelbach going to the opposite field a lot.  It could be a good sign, it could be a bad sign, or it could be a meaningless result of small sample size.

But it IS unusual.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 09:47:31 pm
Ha: 2-4, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, BB

Vitters: 0-2, RBI, 2 BB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_25_cngaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 10:32:09 pm
Jackson: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, E   (Tying RBI 2B with 2 out in 9th)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_25_iowaaa_orhaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 25, 2011, 10:50:29 pm
ArizonaPhil

Vogelbach (called "Fat Boy" by the Giants when they first saw him) showed his hitting skill throughout the game, as the opposing pitchers mostly tried to work him away. While he pulled (tomahawked) a high, hanging breaking ball out for the monster HR onto the roof of the batting cages in the 4th, he also hit opposite-field ropes in four other ABs when the Giants tried to stay away from his pull-power (line-drive single to LF in the 1st, L-7 line-drive out in the 3rd, hard-hit 6-3 ground out in the 6th, and a ground rule line-drive double that sliced into the LF corner before going out of play in the 8th). Vogelbach also displayed plenty of patience in his six plate appearances, showing that he is not afraid to go deep into counts and hit with two strikes (the lead-off walk in the bottom of the 9th with the score tied 15-15 was vintage Rickey Henderson).

It's hard to explain Vogelbach's baserunning, because he is certainly is not fast, but while Rock Shoulders (for instance) is bottom-heavy and runs like a 350-pound nose tackle, Vogelbach runs more like a pulling-guard. Again, he is not fast, but he runs hard and gets down the line OK. He is most-definitely faster than Shoulders.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 25, 2011, 10:51:02 pm
ArizonaPhil

In addition to Vogelbach's big day, Cubs 2011 9th round pick LF Garrett Schlecht (Waterloo HS - Waterloo, IL) reached base five time (four walks and a single) and scored three runs. The 18-year old lefty-swinging Schlecht has (at best) average speed, and is a below-average defender with an average arm, but he is a solid spray hitter with power potential, and (as evidenced by the four walks) is EXTREMELY patient and choosy at the plate. Three of his four walks today happened after he was initially down 0-2. Schlecht was set to attend Middle Tennessee,before signing with the Cubs for a reported $235K (about equivalent to "4th round money").
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 25, 2011, 10:51:45 pm
ArizonaPhil

20-year old 26th round draft pick RHP Michael Jensen (Hartnell JC) had a rocking-chair easy nine-pitch 1-2-3 top of the 1st (F-7, K-swinging, and an F-9), while 19-year old 5th round pick RHP Tayler Scott (Notre Dame Prep - Scottsdale, AZ) allowed three runs on three hits (a single, a double, and a triple) and a walk, with one strikeout and a 1/3 GO/FO, in 1.2 IP (25 pitches - 14 strikes). Both pitchers threw nothing but fastballs, but Jensen's sat at 94, while Scott's was topping out at 91.


Jensen gave up a chance to pitch at USC when he signed with the Cubs for $225K ("4th round money") and appears like he could maybe be another one of those McNutt-Struck-Kurcz JUCO finds, while Scott is the South African baseball & soccer prodigy whose parents moved to the U. S. just Tayler could work with pitching guru Tom House. Scott gave up a chance to both pitch AND play soccer at the University of Arizona when he signed with the Cubs ($279,950 bonus).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 10:59:51 pm
Jensen's my sleeper from this draft. If USC wants you, you probably have talent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 11:01:37 pm
Might as well post the rest of Phil's report:

Quote
18-year old Venezuelan hitting sensation Gioskar Amaya was pulled from the game by Manager Juan "Pee-Pee" Cabreja after smashing his bat to smithereens when he struck out (swinging) in the bottom of the 5th, and LHP (and losing pitcher) Luis Villalba was kicked out of the game by the home plate umpire after vehemently protesting the second consecutive balk called against him in the top of the 12th (which directly resulted in the Giants scoring what would be the eventual winning run and an "insurance" run). Fact is the Giants baserunners just absolutely screwed with Villalba's head with two outs and runners at 2nd & 3rd in the top of the 12th, causing him to make unnecessary movements while standing on the pitching rubber in response to two different baserunners faking a steal of home... TWICE IN A ROW...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 25, 2011, 11:05:42 pm
I think my sleeper is Trey Martin, if you can call a 13th rounder a sleeper.

The biggest surprise (to me) is Zeke DeVoss.  At the time of the draft, I thought he was a substantial overpick, but he is close to becoming my favorite draftee, in a class that already has several that intrigue me, such as Vogelbach.

The second pleasant surprise is Neftali Rosario, who looks like he might combine very good catcher defense with some decent power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 11:17:01 pm
who looks like he might combine very good catcher defense

I wouldn't go that far yet. Rosario has 6 passed balls already.

He's certainly shown some pop though. Walk to K ratio is a bit scary, but he's young.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 11:17:44 pm
DeVoss: 3-5, 2 RBI, K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_25_boiasx_skvasx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2011, 11:34:10 pm
From a Kevin Goldstein chat today:

Quote
SenatorsGuy
(31989)

Trey McNutt - what have we learned in 2011?


BP staff member Kevin Goldstein
BP staff
(27460)

Has scuffled with mechanics, throws everything with 100% effort, stuff is still good, but there are a lot of concerns.


...


Quote
marshaja
(16270)

I've noticed Zack DeVoss in the updates a few times recently. Will his lack of power kill the on-base percentage as he climbs or does he develop enough to be a useful player and take advantage of the plate discipline?


BP staff member Kevin Goldstein
BP staff
(27460)

That's the million dollar question, and the reason he's more intriguing than a big prospect at this time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 25, 2011, 11:52:52 pm
Over his first two seasons, singles Darvill had 5 doubles in 324 AB. 

Up until last week, he was only about twice as good, with only 6 doubles in 175 AB. 

Now in his last 6 games he's got 7 doubles in 21 AB. 

Progress. 

Maybe when he matures into his 20's, he'll continue to get stronger.  Who knows. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 26, 2011, 12:05:03 am
If DeVoss can get on base enough and supplement that with a high number of steals (he's 16/20 so far), his lack of power won't be all that worrisome.

Hopefully, he develops some doubles and triples to go along with his walks and singles.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 26, 2011, 12:56:21 am
who looks like he might combine very good catcher defense

I wouldn't go that far yet. Rosario has 6 passed balls already.

Short season stats are not very indicative, either good ones or bad ones.  Which is why I used the term MIGHT.  The draft scouting reports on him were quite good as to his defense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 26, 2011, 01:35:07 am
Between Schlecht and Devoss and Vogelbach, and I am sure there are others, it is great to see such choosiness at the plate for the Cub hitters.  It seems they've looked for guys like that at top of draft lately, but with the purse strings loosening some this year, they may have gotten some high end talent to go with it.

Devoss has probably been the most pleasant surprise to me so far, as well.  I had expected him to disappoint, but I like him as a player from what i've read since he's signed and begun playing. 

My favorite guy is Vogelbach, mainly because he seems like a good hard working guy, and is so easy to root for.

Can I go with Jensen as my sleeper since he was a 26th round pick, even though he was a usc signee and has a 94 mph fastball?  Methinks, I'd like to say I called such a low round sleeper in a few years.  I've always wanted to be right about something.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2011, 05:16:04 am
Pretty interesting stuff on Vogelbach from a nearly year old Perfect Game piece:


Quote
JUPITER, Fla. – FTB Mizuno/Cardinals Scout Team boasts a roster overflowing with Aflac All-Americans and top-50 ranked players.

But it should be noted the team emerging leader is a stocky, heavyset power-hitter who seems to remind everyone of that old newsreel footage you see of Babe Ruth.

First baseman Daniel Vogelbach, a 5-11, 280-pound powder keg from Fort Myers, Fla., is widely considered one of the best power hitters in attendance at the Perfect Game WWBA World Championship, which concludes Monday.

His power-hitting and bulk isn’t the only thing that evokes comparisons to The Babe. He walks and runs in a very similar manner to what you see on those old newsreels, and even his facial features resemble Ruth’s.

Just based on his build, there will also be inevitable comparisons to Prince Fielder as Vogelbach’s career continues.

It is on the field and in the dugout where Vogelbach excels.

“He’s one of the best clubhouse guys you will ever see,” FTB Mizuno/CST coach Jered Goodwin said. “He’s very high energy and he keeps things very loose. When we need to get up and going and when we need someone to step in and cut the tension, he’s who we turn to.”

FTB Mizuno/CST beat Perfect Game Columbia Blue, 10-0, Sunday afternoon to earn a spot in the World Championship playoffs later in the evening. Vogelbach walked three times in the game, scored three runs and stole two bases.

The performance showed that even though Vogelbach seems to walk stiffly and has a lot of weight to carry, he is actually very quick on his feet.

After scoring the first time, he also showed how he keeps thing loose in the dugout. Upon reaching the bench, he pleaded for some Gold Bond medicated power, unbuckled his pants and applied the powder to the affected area.

“I’m chafing!” he said to a group of vastly amused teammates.

“I try to help everyone stay loose and play hard,” Vogelbach said. “We have to play hard or any team here can beat you. But it’s been a priveledge and a lot of fun to play with these guys. We come to the park loose and ready to play hard.”

At the 2010 Perfect Game National Showcase at Tropicana Field in Tampa, Fla., a Perfect Game scout said this about Vogelbach:

“Superior hitting prospect, sees the ball very well, hands are fast to contact, can drive it out of the park to all fields, smooth extension out front, will hit for power.”

...

Vogelbach, a polite “Yes, sir” “No, sir” young man with a vice grip of a hand shake, will play his final season of high school ball in the spring for Bishop Verot High School in Fort Myers. In the fall of 2011, he’ll be heading for Gainesville.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2011, 05:35:07 am
And more from a PG article this past May:


Quote
When Vogelbach played for FTB Mizuno/Cardinals Scout Team at the WWBA World Championship last fall, the official program noted he was carrying 280 pounds on his 5-foot-11 frame. That over-sized physique often evoked comparisons to Milwaukee Brewers All-Star and Perfect Game alumna Prince Fielder, but was also viewed as an area of concern in some scouts’ evaluations.

He has since slimmed down to the more manageable 245-250 range and is feeling better than ever.

“The biggest thing is just keeping where I’m at and getting more in shape and continuing to prove that I can stay there,” Vogelbach said. “Coach Goodwin was my biggest guy with that one, and he always told me that there were a lot of people that didn’t really buy into the body situation. He told me how great I could be, and with him pushing me it gave me the motivation to lose the weight and continue to stay in shape.

“I feel like it’s made me a better hitter,” he continued. “I feel like it’s helped my hands stay more loose and my hips to get through quicker. The inside pitch was hard for me to hit before and now that I’ve lost the weight I think that I can get around on the inside pitch easier.”

The bat speed and eye-popping power has always been there, and was easy for scouts to recognize. Perfect Game director of scouting David Rawnsley made the following observation in his detailed pre-draft scouting report on Vogelbach:

“(He) is enormously strong and along with his loose, easy wrists generates outstanding bat speed from the left side of the plate. Another factor that makes Vogelbach unique in the scouting community is that it is almost easier to break down his mental approach to hitting rather his physical approach. … The young man eats, sleeps and breathes swinging a bat, and is an exceptionally confident hitter who doesn’t believe that any pitcher should ever get him out.”

Vogelbach is also a standout defensive first baseman, and doesn’t want to be viewed simply as someone who only hits a lot of home runs. His batting average (.474) and on-base percentage (.579) playing high school baseball this spring should dispel that notion.

“I’ve had to prove that I’m not just a power-hitter and show people I don’t strikeout very much,” he said. “There are going to be those people who just see me as a power-hitter or a kid that just hits the ball a long way, but in my mind I think I’m a complete hitter.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 26, 2011, 05:37:15 am
Vogelbach has been my favorite from the start.  His weight loss between his junior and senior years speaks volumes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 26, 2011, 07:14:02 am
Chris - Thanks for the Perfect Game bits on Vogelbach.  They are consistent with other reports I read during the draft but far more detailed - and damned encouraging.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 26, 2011, 07:16:39 am
What did Fielder possess in high school, besides his father's bloodlines, to makes him the 7th overall choice of the 2002 draft that Vogelbach lacks? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 26, 2011, 07:31:29 am
from wiki -- Fielder spent his first three years of high school playing at Florida Air Academy. He then transferred to Eau Gallie High School to play baseball there his senior year (2002).[2] He hit .524 with 13 doubles, 10 home runs, 41 RBIs, and 47 runs in his senior year. He was named by the Florida Today as the All-Space Coast Player of the Year in 2002.[3]

Prince entered Eau Gallie High School in the fall of 1998. By his sophomore year, he was the best hitter for the Commodores, but scouts were already skeptical. At close to 300 pounds, Prince was criticzed for being undisciplined and unathletic. Both were unfair characterizations.

Prince has a huge season in his senior year, batting .524 with 10 home runs. Noting his awesome power and no-nonsense attitude on the field, big league teams were now salivating over the youngster. The only concern was that Prince was all bat and no glove. Drafting a player who potentially couldn't field his position was a risk that scared some clubs away.

Prince was determined to change that perception. Cecil, acting as his son’s agent, hired a personal trainer for his son, helping him shave 60 pounds off of his big frame. More fit and lean, the teenager increased his speed and agility. Prince turned himself into a surefire first rounder.

ON THE RISE

from http://www.jockbio.com/Bios/Fielder/Fielder_bio.html  Prince was drafted by the Brewers was the seventh overall pick in June of 2002. Baseball America rated him as the draft's top first baseman and 24th best prospect overall. Milwaukee inked him to deal that included a $2.4 million signing bonus.   Prince's first stop was Ogden, Utah in the Pioneer Rookie League. In his pro debut, he slammed a game-tying grand slam in the ninth inning. He never stopped hitting. In 41 games with the Raptors, Prince batted.390 with 10 home runs, 12 doubles, and 40 RBIs.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 26, 2011, 07:49:37 am
Thanks for those articles, Chris.  Really interesting.  The stuff about the leadership and chemistry/get-along skills are nice.  AzPhil had the Giants guys calling him "fatboy"; probably having a sense of humor about stuff like that would be good for him.

Rawnsley talked about the mental approach and eats/sleeps/breathes hitting.  I like that, and am not sure how many guys we've had prospects or big-league who have really been like that.   “I feel like it’s helped my hands stay more loose and my hips to get through quicker. The inside pitch was hard for me to hit before and now that I’ve lost the weight I think that I can get around on the inside pitch easier.” That sounds more analytical than what I'm accustomed to from Winfield Mallory or Ryan Harvey. 

The "inside pitch was hard for me to hit" comment is noteworthy.  Hopefully the weight management will prevent that, and hopefully it's just hyperbole.  (Pujols talks about certain pitches being hard for him too, but Colvin wishes there was something as easy for him as what's supposedly "hard" for Pujols....) 

I think the character stuff is potentially pretty central for a guy like this.  College and NFL football is filled with guys a lot heavier than 240, and many linemen in the NFL are fighting to keep their weight "down" to 320.  But there are all kinds of big NFL guys who have a career-long fight to keep their strength up and their weight down.  Obviously there is more weight-room time available for football, and they aren't on the road all the time playing every night as in the baseball minor leaguers, so they've got more opportunity to have the body-management fight take up as much time as playing or practicing football does.  But I guess I don't see any reason why Vogelbach can't win that body-management fight just like so many massive college and professional football players do. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 26, 2011, 11:30:00 am
I guess I don't see any reason why Vogelbach can't win that body-management fight just like so many massive college and professional football players do. 

That fact that he has already seemed to turn back the weight issue, still recognizes it is something he has to continue to work on, and is still working on it tells me he will have it under control.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 26, 2011, 12:23:15 pm
Weight control can be like alcohol control.  Even if you lick it, it is always a threat that hangs over your head.

But many people have overcome a tendency to be fat.  A close friend of mine weighed 290 pounds as a young man.  One day, he was carried out of the office on a stretcher because of blood sugar problems.  It scared him enough to do something about it.  He is 69 years old today, and has maintained that weight for more than 40 years.

And then, there is Earl Cunningham.

I am betting that if Vogelbach fails, it won't be because of his weight.  A friend of mine lives in Mesa, and has met Vogelbach, even having dinner with him the other day.  He says this is one determined and focused kid.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 26, 2011, 01:31:17 pm
The battle that I think will be hardest for Vogelbach, as far as weight goes, will be the challenge of minor league meal money.

Once he leaves a host family and starts living on his own for real, it might be difficult to resist the temptation of fast food.

It's pretty easy to "eat right" when your mother (or a host family) is cooking for you and watching your nutrition but it's a whole different matter once you're out on your own and it's 11:00 at night and you sure could go for a Whopper.

I'm not saying that he'll lose that battle.  In fact, I hope that he wins it.

I'm only saying that it will be tempting for him to fall back into poor habits.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2011, 03:50:17 pm
Javier Baez: 1-4, SB, E

Vogelbach: 0-3, BB

Amaya: 3-4, CS

Simpson: 1-3-1-1-2-0

Zych: 1-1-1-1-0-1, HB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_26_cubrok_athrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 26, 2011, 04:19:45 pm
In his pro debut in the AZL, Javier Baez has beaten out infield hit, stolen third in his second at bat, and he has started two double plays.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 26, 2011, 06:40:43 pm
Tennessee Smokies
PlayerIPHRERBBSOHRERA
Cashner (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t553&t=p_pbp&pid=488768) 1.000001010.80
Raley (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t553&t=p_pbp&pid=548384) 1.00000104.07
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 26, 2011, 07:39:16 pm
Injured?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 26, 2011, 07:47:53 pm
Cashner is on a one inning or 25 pitch limit, whichever comes first
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2011, 09:16:45 pm
Abreu: 0-4, K   (1 for last 26)

Del Valle: 2-1/3 IP, 9 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_26_dbcafa_dunafa_1

Ha: 1-3, RBI, BB, CS

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_26_jaxaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2011, 09:58:14 pm
Kirk: 4 IP, 7 R, 3 HR   (23 Runs & 6 HR's last 4 starts)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_26_qcsafx_peoafx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2011, 10:37:37 pm
Jackson: 3-5, HR, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_26_iowaaa_orhaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2011, 11:40:33 pm
DeVoss: 1-4, 2B, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t480&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_26_boiasx_skvasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 27, 2011, 01:26:30 am
If I read it right, DeVoss has 13 errors in 31 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 27, 2011, 06:57:58 am
Quote
From Baseball America chat yesterday

   Dan (Chicago): Josh Vitters walked TWICE! in the same game yesterday and has 5 in his last 9 games. Small sample size that means nothing or good sign that he may finally be learning some patience???

Matthew Eddy: I'll go farther than that. Vitters has seven walks in 23 August games for Double-A Tennessee, giving him roughly one-third of his totals for 2008-09 in 185 games. Real progress? We'll see, but this was an amusing question.

I wonder if that is a by product of waiting on "his" pitch to hit...Hopefully, it's not some small sample size fluke and shows he has taken a step forward this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 27, 2011, 07:56:12 am
I wonder if that is a by product of waiting on "his" pitch to hit...Hopefully, it's not some small sample size fluke and shows he has taken a step forward this year.

When combined with his comments in the recent interview where he talked about finally understanding that he needed to wait to get pitches he could really drive instead of swinging at anything he could put the bat on, it is a very encouraging sign.

Of course Vitters increasingly appears so dense that the lesson may be one that he forgets entirely during the off-season and takes the first two months of 2012 to re-learn.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 27, 2011, 08:03:03 am
If I'm calculating right, Jackson has a sweet .444 BABIP for Iowa. 

A .333 BABIP is higher than most players can sustain, but a .333 BABIP would give him a .246 average at Iowa.

Funny thing is, this isn't the first time that I've noted Jackson having batting averages dependent on exceptionally high BABIP.  So while I don't expect him to sustain .444 at Iowa, much less the NL, there may be some reason for it. 

Obviously speed is often considered to be a contributor to good BABIP.  Frequently a sweet line-drive or contact stroke is as well.  Given that he K's a third of his AB, a contact stroke wouldn't seem to apply for Brett.  I wonder if in his case his very selectivity might be a contributor?  The idea that I only swing at stuff that I can whack, maybe that's really how it works in his case?  So when he does swing, it's something in his good zone and he's got a higher than average chance of hitting it hard?  That might reconcile the high BABIP with the high K.  Kind of the counterpoint for guys like Vitters and Daytona-version Szczur, guys who are supposed to have unusual contact skills but run low BABIPs, in Szczur's case despite his speed. 

Another possibility that might reconcile high-K/high-BABIP might be doing a lot of guess hitting.  If I guess fastball, and get fastball, maybe I have a high bABIP.  If I get fastball and get curve, maybe I whiff and it doesn't even compromise my BABIP?  And maybe if I get what I'm not guessing early in the count I just don't swing at all, which contributes to the high walks and also contributes to lots of counts getting to 2 strikes and thus result in the high K's? 


In any case, I hope there is some real reason why Jackson will be able to sustain extraordinarily high BABIP rates despite his mega-K rate.  HR's, walks, and a high BABIP would all be three virtues that combined might offset being mega-K. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 27, 2011, 08:41:44 am
Craig's BABIP comment is a good caveat.  But after struggling a lot when he came back from his injury, Jackson has been on fire.  His numbers for Iowa are now .323 BA, .397 OBA, .595 SLG, .992 OPS, with 9 HR, 2 3B, 25 RBI, 6 SB (1 CS) in 40 games.  Not bad numbers for a quality defensive CF.

I guess maybe the Cubs should call him up in September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 27, 2011, 09:05:43 am
Craig's BABIP comment is a good caveat.  But after struggling a lot when he came back from his injury, Jackson has been on fire.  His numbers for Iowa are now .323 BA, .397 OBA, .595 SLG, .992 OPS, with 9 HR, 2 3B, 25 RBI, 6 SB (1 CS) in 40 games.  Not bad numbers for a quality defensive CF.

I guess maybe the Cubs should call him up in September.
Quote from: Bleacher Nation
Bruce Miles is guessing that top prospect Brett Jackson is not called up in September when rosters expand. Before you freak out, just remember that – unlike with so many other Cubs’ decisions – there is a good reason for not calling Jackson up: to do so would require that he be added to the 40-man roster, where he would have to remain all Winter. That means there would be one less spot for the Cubs to protect players from the Rule 5 Draft (for which Jackson is not eligible, and thus not at risk).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 27, 2011, 11:04:23 am
Mike Brenly is hitting .206.  Looks like he's reached his ceiling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 27, 2011, 11:52:28 am
In his father's day, a poor hitting, good defensive catcher could reasonably expect to have a shot at a starting position.  In the current era, the best someone could reasonably expect would be a backup catcher position.

I wonder if it would help if he changed his name to Hill?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 27, 2011, 12:05:02 pm
Quade and Hill will be looking for work as soon as the new GM shows up.


I hope.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 27, 2011, 12:27:00 pm
I guess maybe the Cubs should call him up in September.

Or sell high now and trade him for a 35-year-old middle reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 27, 2011, 02:21:41 pm
Watch Brett Jackson's home run from last night here:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?content_id=18494549
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 27, 2011, 02:23:42 pm
Of course, it wouldn't be a GOOD 35-year-old middle reliever.

It isn't a certainty that he will be called up in September.  The Cubs are going to have a crunch on their 40 man roster this winter, and they may not want to waste a roster spot just for a one month look-see.  At least, that is the belief of ArizonaPhil.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 27, 2011, 02:27:27 pm
No 40 man roster problems if you simply remove some of the dead wood on the 25 man roster. 

That would clear about 20 spots.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 27, 2011, 02:34:11 pm
The Cubs (and ArizonaPhil) may have a different definition of "deadwood" than you have.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 27, 2011, 02:51:55 pm
Fools.

Seriously.  Take a look at the roster and try to determine who on it now is likely to be around to meaningfully contribute whenever it is that the Cubs are next a strong team, and to continue to meaningfully contribute for the next few years after that an hopefully help them remain a strong team returning to the playoffs year after year.

Castro.  Cashner.  Perpaps Marshall and Garza (though I still am not sold on Garza).

Okay, so the Cubs could clear 21 spots.

Aside from Colvin, who likely simply has no current value and might regain considerable value next year if the Cubs do not completely destroy him this year, perhaps Barney and perhaps Coleman, the rest of the team is little more than a collection of spare parts or aging vets who are not going to be around when this team is next worth a damb.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 27, 2011, 08:19:44 pm
Szczur: 0-3, SF, RBI, K   ( 7 for last 35, 0 BB's )

Antigua: 5-6-3-3-1-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_27_dbcafa_dunafa_1


Ha: 2-4, RBI   ( 13 for last 30, 4 BB / 4 K )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_27_jaxaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 27, 2011, 08:26:05 pm
( 7 for last 35, 0 BB's )

Looks like he's really taken to Cub coaching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 27, 2011, 08:30:11 pm
( 7 for last 35, 0 BB's )

Looks like he's really taken to Cub coaching.
Et tu, JR?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 27, 2011, 09:19:36 pm
Sure would be nice to see the Cubs have Szczur repeat at Daytona, and tell him the reason he is repeating is that he needs to get on base more, that walking is a good way to do that, and that he is not going to see AA until he combines hitting for average with taking a fair share of walks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 27, 2011, 09:59:49 pm
Jackson: 0-4, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_27_iowaaa_orhaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_27_peoafx_kccafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 27, 2011, 10:42:04 pm
Baez: 1-4, 2 K, E

Vogelbach: 1-4

Amaya: 2-4  (7-gm hit-streak: 14-28)

Rosario: 0-1, BB, 2 E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_27_cubrok_giarok_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 27, 2011, 11:35:45 pm
Folks the numbers Jae Hoon Ha is posting this year as a 20-year-old aren't shabby, especially at Double-A.  Plus what type of chance does Rebel Ridling to make it in the majors ? He's hitting over .300 wth 20 homers and he will finish with more than 80 rbi's and he's hit at every level, with moderate strike-out numbers.

Plus I still think Jay Jackson is going to have a role on the Cubs pitching staff as we go forward. I realize he's had a bad year, overall but he's been much more consistent  the second half of the year and especially here in August.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 28, 2011, 12:01:23 am
Golden: 0-3, 2 K   ( 0 for last 21 w/ 10 K's )

DeVoss: 0-4, 2 K

http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t480&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_27_boiasx_skvasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 28, 2011, 12:59:18 am
Ha has done well, but he has really been on a see-saw.  He was below 200, came up to about 300, went down below 250, and now moving back towards 300.

He doesn't walk much, nor does he strike out much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 28, 2011, 01:52:48 am
Ha has done well, but he has really been on a see-saw.  He was below 200, came up to about 300, went down below 250, and now moving back towards 300.

He doesn't walk much, nor does he strike out much.

I'd say he's doing very well. He struggled at first, then adjusted to the higher league. Then the opposing pitchers figured out how to get him out. Now he seems to be making adjustments in his approach that appear to be working.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 28, 2011, 04:16:47 am
Seven Chiefs are scheduled to participate in the Chicago Cubs’ fall Instructional League. Position players Rubi Silva, Taiwan Easterling, Dustin Geiger and Micah Gibbs and pitchers Starling Peralta, Luis Liria and Frank Del Valle will head to the Cubs’ complex in Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 28, 2011, 09:31:57 am
Ha's recent hot streak has been nice to see.  His OPS is well up over .700 now, all the way up to .746 at AA and up to .738 for the year. And his OBP is also well up over .300 now, .324 at AA and up to .316 for the season. 

His present minor-league profile falls somewhere in comparable to Theriot-Barney-Pierre-Reed Johnson-Hollandsworth type players.  Barney with some power.  Johnson without the walks (and 200 OPS less than careeer-year 2011 Johnson....).  Theriot without the walks but with some power.

Johnson and Hollandworth had/have career OPS around the .760 range, not that much higher than Ha's .738.  Per 162 games, Johnson has averaged 10 HR, Hollandworth 14.  Flexible guys who could play any outfield position (Hollandworth was a good CF when he was young, I think.) 

Ha is so young that one can hope or imagine anything.  Who knows how much better he might get.  I think it's still plausible that in time he'll blossom into a Juan-Pierre level walk-taker.  He's well below that now, and other than Sammy Sosa I can't recall any Cub player really improving in that area, but it's always possible. 

I think the HR projection is really the question.  Eleven HR in 500 AB isn't enough to build a career on, but if he matures from 11 to 20, different story. 


We'll see how things go.  Even young guys go hot and cold, so I'm cautious that he's really made any lasting, permanent, sustainable adjustment that will enable him to sustain his August production long-term.  More likely he's just happened to get into a groove, and it won't last.  But hopefully he has adjusted and will just get better and better. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 28, 2011, 01:29:42 pm
One thing is for certain, Ha will never be a big base stealer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 28, 2011, 01:45:43 pm
One thing is for certain, Ha will never be a big base stealer.

Heh heh, he might have Pierre-esque anti-K contact skills but he doesn't steal or walk like Pierre.  Hopefully he'll hit more HR's, show enough extra-base power, and be superior defensively, so that he'll end up a more valuable big-leaguer than Pierre. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 28, 2011, 02:12:21 pm
Heh heh, he might have Pierre-esque anti-K contact skills but he doesn't steal or walk like Pierre.  Hopefully he'll hit more HR's, show enough extra-base power, and be superior defensively, so that he'll end up a more valuable big-leaguer than Pierre. 

Not sure what to make of this comment.  Pierre has averaged 39 BB per 162 games during his career.  That's not exactly a high bar.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 28, 2011, 04:05:20 pm
Pierre in the majors had an IsoD of .49.  In the minors it was .48.

Ha's IsoD so far is .36 and this year it is .38.

If Ha improves it to the Pierre rate it will mean reaching base one more time in 100 ABs, or roughly 6 times in the course of a full season.

If Ha has an arm which allows him to hit the cut-off man on the fly, that alone will more than offset the marginal advantage Pierre would offer from his greater ability to take a walk.  Ha's power would also seem to be a bit of an edge, since Pierre had only 1 HR in 1452 plate appearances in the minors and only 16 time in 7369 PA in the majors.  Ha has 11 in 493 minor league AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 28, 2011, 04:06:23 pm
Not sure what to make of this comment.  Pierre has averaged 39 BB per 162 games during his career.  That's not exactly a high bar.

It's high for Ha.  Pierre's is low, but not nearly as bad as Ha's.  Ha has some anti-awful work to do to become a merely very-bad walker.  Pierre's career is around 15AB/walk, Ha is >20AB/walk. 

At 20 anything is possible, and I've always thought that a guy with the gift of contact could take walks if he was motivated to do so.  With that gift, it's not like a 2-strike count is curtains.  Perhaps with Fleita's direction, Ha will be improving that a lot in the years ahead.

But usually guys walk considerably less in majors than in minors.  So guys who don't walk in minors, they almost never walk in majors. 

If Ha wants some peripheral offensive value, I think it's going to need to be in the area of power, because it's pretty unlikely either walks or stolen bases are going to part of his package. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 28, 2011, 05:59:21 pm
It's high for Ha.  Pierre's is low, but not nearly as bad as Ha's.  Ha has some anti-awful work to do to become a merely very-bad walker.  Pierre's career is around 15AB/walk, Ha is >20AB/walk.

Pierre in the majors had an IsoD of .49.  In the minors it was .48.  Ha's IsoD so far is .36 and this year it is .38.  If Ha improves it to the Pierre rate it will mean reaching base one more time in 100 ABs, or roughly 6 times in the course of a full season.

It doesn't take much power to more than offset that.  2 HR a year would be enough.

Perhaps with Fleita's direction, Ha will be improving that a lot in the years ahead.

He's doomed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 28, 2011, 06:15:08 pm
It doesn't take much power to more than offset that.  2 HR a year would be enough.

He's doomed.

Your stats suggest it would require .36-.38 to 0.48.  So improve his IsoD rate by another 3.  133% boost.  When numbers are so tiny in the first place, it's not that super hard to improve them.  And it's also true that with such small numbers, it doesn't take many HR's to offset. 

Pierre's career big-league OBP is .346.  Ha's this year is .316.  That's a non-trivial difference. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 28, 2011, 06:49:05 pm
Jackson: 1-1 (PH 1B)

Coello: 2-0-0-0-1-2   (17-1/3 IP, 6 H, 26 K's  in August)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_28_iowaaa_orhaaa_1&t=g_box&did=milb

Szczur: 0-5, 2 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_28_dbcafa_dunafa_1


Vitters: 0-3, RBI, BB, E

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_28_jaxaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&did=milb


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_28_peoafx_kccafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 28, 2011, 07:12:16 pm
Pierre's career big-league OBP is .346.  Ha's this year is .316.  That's a non-trivial difference. 

And Ha this year is a 20 year old in AA, while Pierre is 33 and has been in the majors since he was 22.  That is also a non-trivial difference.

To look at the two of them at the same age, you compare what Ha is doing this year with what Pierre did at age 20 when Pierre was in low A ball.  Pierre did well in low A, hitting .352, with an OBP of .399 and an OPS of .800, better than the numbers Pierre put up the next year at age 21 in A ball, when he hit .320, with an OBP of .366 and an OPS of .756.

Ha, a year younger than Pierre was when Pierre was in A ball, has a BA of .286, OBP of .324 and and OPS of .746.  Pierre did not reach AA until he was 22, two years older than Ha is now when Has is in AA.  When Ha was in A ball (the level Pierre was in at the same age Ha is now), Ha was 19, and hit .317, with an OBP of .334 and and OPS of .802... two points better than Pierre did there when Pierre was a year older than Ha at that level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 28, 2011, 07:29:32 pm
Mesa's season ends. Hopefully Baez will get some work in defensively. Yeesh.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 28, 2011, 07:29:41 pm
Baez: 2-4, 2 2B, SB, 3 E  ( 5 E's in 3 games )

Vogelbach: 1-3, 2B, RBI, HBP  (Finishes w/ 2 K's in 24 AB's)

Amaya: 3-4, 2B, SB  (Finishes at .377, 2nd in the AL)

Shoulders: 1-4, 2B, RBI, 3 K

Scott: 2-1-0-0-0-1

Jensen: 2-1-0-0-0-2



http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_28_diarok_cubrok_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 28, 2011, 10:34:01 pm
ArizonaPhil

Cubs #1 draft pick Javier Baez got the start at SS and batted 2nd in the order today.


He doubled off the top of the LF fence and then stole 3B in the bottom of the 1st, flied out to the warning track in CF in his 2nd AB in the 3rd, flied out to the warning track in LF in the bottom of the 5th, and then doubled off the top of the right-centerfield fence in his 4th PA leading off the five-run 8th. No question the kid has big-time power.


But Baez wasn't quite as impressive in the field, committing three careless errors at SS that resulted in three unearned runs scoring. While he made one nifty "no-look" back-handed stop & throw worthy of the Harlem Globetrotters in the top of the 2nd, and started a key 6-4-3 DP to help protect the Cubs one-run lead in the top of the 9th, he also bobbled two easy bouncers (one in the 6th and another in the 8th) allowing batters to reach base (both eventually scored), and then on one of the fielding errors he blew his cool, launching a totally unnecessary throw over the 1st baseman's head (the batter had already crossed 1st base) allowing the batter-runner to advance to 2nd base.


The 18-year old Baez is kind of cocky and a bit of a "hot dog" (like holding the ball an extra beat and then firing a rocket to 1st base, or trying to turn a routine play into an ESPN Sports Center highlight), and he is a bit chippy with the umpires, too. He does run OK and he is an aggressive base-runner, and while he looks like he enjoys playing SS, he probably does not have the range to stay there. He could eventually end up at 3B, or maybe even a corner OF spot (he appears to have the arm strength needed to play RF). However, the Cubs will probably leave him at SS for a while to help ease his adjustment to pro ball, since he obviously feels comfortable playing the position.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 28, 2011, 10:35:37 pm
ArizonaPhil

Cubs 2011 2nd round pick Dan Vogelbach played 1B and batted 3rd today, and handled himself well around the bag at 1st base. He also (once again) took an outside fastball and hammered it to the opposite field (into the LF corner) for an RBI double, driving in Baez for the Cubs 1st run in the bottom of the 8th.


DH Rock Shoulders--who struck out in each of his first three AB, looking totally lost trying to hit breaking balls and off-speed pitches--then put a hurt on a first-pitch fastball, pulling it down the RF line for a double to score Vogelbach from 2nd base.


2B Gioskar Amaya followed, lining a single to drive-in Shoulders from 2nd (the hot-hitting Amaya had two singles and a double today, as he went 17-32 over his final eight AZL games), before AZL Cubs supersub Gregori Gonzalez sliced a triple over the right-fielder's head to knock-in Amaya with the tying run.


And then with Carlos Romero squaring for a suicide squeeze bunt, G. Gonzalez scored the go-ahead run (what was the eventual winning run) on (technically) a steal of home, when the Diamondbacks pitcher threw the ball into the dirt and past the catcher.


Cubs 2011 18th round draft pick RHP James Pugliese pitched the 8th inning and struggled to throw strikes (20 pitches - only nine strikes), and despite allowing two walks and an unearned run, picked-up the win, and RHP Rafael Diplan threw a shutout 9th for the save (as the Diamondbacks left the potential tying run stranded at 3rd base).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 28, 2011, 10:59:52 pm
DeVoss: 1-2, 2B, K

Golden: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, K, Assist

Wells: 5-2/3 -7-2-0-0-5


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2011_08_28_boiasx_skvasx_1&t=g_box&did=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 29, 2011, 08:56:46 am
The top draft choices have thrown away 2 months of pro experience. The system has got to change.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 29, 2011, 09:56:11 am
The top draft choices have thrown away 2 months of pro experience. The system has got to change.
In order to make it fair for northern schools, the NCAA baseball season doesn't start as early as it used to but it still it might be a good idea to shut down some college pitchers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2011, 10:39:26 am
It would be better if they had a signiing bonus of July 15.

But let's not lose perspective.  A high school kid will start his pro career 2.9 years earlier, rather than 3 years earlier than if he went to college.  It isn't likely to make much difference in the long run, especially since they will all be sent to Arizona instructional league over the winter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 29, 2011, 03:26:05 pm
The top draft choices have thrown away 2 months of pro experience. The system has got to change.

It is their's to throw away.... but when you refer to "two months of pro experience" you are deliberately distorting the picture.  The pro baseball season is only 6 months long in the majors.  And only 5 months long in the minors, and the first two months of that are written off in the draft year because it has already passed.  So throwing away "two months" of the first year, which is only going to be two and a half months even if the kid signs the day he is drafted, is not trivial, neither in a percentage basis nor for the purpose of allowing the drafting team to place the prospect as far up the development ladder as makes sense for the following season.  If the pick has not proven himself in rookie ball, or in low A ball the season he was drafted, he is going to be at that level the next year, instead of a level or more above it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 29, 2011, 04:45:14 pm
If the pick has not proven himself in rookie ball, or in low A ball the season he was drafted, he is going to be at that level the next year, instead of a level or more above it.

You say this as if it's some kind of demonstrable fact.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2011, 05:20:25 pm
And usually, that is decided as much or more by performance in tht AFL or spring tranining
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 29, 2011, 05:20:28 pm
Bryan LaHair has been named to the 12-man PCL All-Star team.  His 36 HRs lead all of minor league baseball.


(http://iowa.cubs.milb.com/images/2011/08/29/uzN6FsPA.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 29, 2011, 05:28:29 pm
Other recent Iowa Cub players named to the PCL Post-Season All-Star list include Darwin Barney and Brad Snyder (2010), Eric Patterson and Geovany Soto (2007), Rich Hill (2006) and Jermaine Van Buren (2005).
Title: Re: The last 9 days
Post by: dallen7908 on August 29, 2011, 08:20:58 pm


The paths of G. Amaya and M. Hernandez diverged last week.  Amaya hit 0.531 while M. Hernandez hit 0.071.

Wes Darvill had perhaps the first good week of his professional career.  A solid 0.457 with 8 2B in 35 AB.

Junior Lake and Brett Jackson continued their torrid hitting.  Jackson's AAA numbers actually worsened last week.  He hit 0.361 but only had 1 HR.

Ryan Cuneo had 4 HR while Rebel Ridling hit 0.486 and had 3 HR.  Of course both are too old for their respective levels.  Another old timer with a good week was Lou Montanez.   

On the negative side, Reggie Golden had one hit last week (actually 9 days), a homer.

Dustin Geiger continued to look overmatched in low-A.

Abner Abreu also struggled in his return.

On the pitching side, Chris Rusin and Nick Struck struggled in AAA; while Austin Bibens-Dirkx (no ER in 2 starts) and Robert Coello actually pitched well.

Dae-Eun Rhee had a 19/2 K/W ratio in 2 starts. 

For the entire season, the following starting pitchers are most homer prone:

Casey Coleman 1.34
Dallas Beeler 1.23
Frank Del Valle 1.02
Casey Harman 1.33
Matt Loosen 1.45
Brooks Raley 1.02
Austin bibens-Dirkx 1.52
Starlin Peralta 1.56
and of course the now released J. R. Mathes 2.46
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 29, 2011, 08:43:33 pm
The paths of G. Amaya and M. Hernandez diverged last week.


Hernandez didn't play in any of the final four games of the season, leading me to believe he had some sort of injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 29, 2011, 08:56:48 pm
I sure hope Q plays LaHair when he comes up next month.  We need to see if he's the second coming of Ryan Ludwick or of Micah Hoffapuir.

It sure would be nice to have a hard hitting, cheap first baseman next season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 29, 2011, 09:11:10 pm
Vitters: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, K

McNutt: 6-6-1-1-3-5

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_29_jaxaax_tenaax_1

Szczur: 2-6

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_29_dbcafa_dunafa_1


Peoria:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_29_peoafx_kccafx_1


Boise off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 29, 2011, 09:31:48 pm
Jackson: 1-3, 2B, 2 BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_29_nasaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 29, 2011, 10:13:25 pm
As the minor league seasons wind down, thanks again, Chris, for posting the box scores.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on August 29, 2011, 10:22:21 pm
Agreed StrikeZone...thanks Chris!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 29, 2011, 10:54:13 pm
And I'll add my thanks, Chris.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 29, 2011, 11:09:49 pm
I agree thanks Chris for taking the time to post all the info.

Rebel Ridling had two more hits tonight and another RBI , which gives him 79 for the year and his avg is upto .313
with just 80 K's in over 400 ab's, wth 20 HR's in his first year at Double A is damn impressive

Cashner worked another scoreless inning tonight, in his third re-hab start for the Smokies, striking-out the side
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 29, 2011, 11:24:07 pm
With Josh Vitters hitting .283 with 13 HR's and over 70 RBI's do you promote him automatically next year to Iowa or do you let him start next year again at Double- A ? If you start Vitters at Double-A thats more AB's for Flaherty and Lemahieu at Iowa next season, to start anyway ?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2011, 11:35:42 pm
It depends upon spring training, but I would probably start him in Tennessee, just to see if he can dominate there for part of a season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 29, 2011, 11:41:02 pm
I pick secret option C, where you trade him for a valuable Major League piece.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2011, 11:49:13 pm
Vitters?  I doubt that you could get a valuable major league piece for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 29, 2011, 11:50:06 pm
Because he's a Cubs farm hand?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2011, 11:59:19 pm
Because at this point he is not a highly thought of farm hand.

But I suppose that depends upon what you think a "valuable major league piece" is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 30, 2011, 06:11:42 am
Everybody's thanking Chris for posting the minor league stuff...  what short memories you all have.  Chris is a Cardinal fan who only posts here to taunt Cub fans with what lousy crap they have in the minors.  Wise up, people!


(Thanks, Chris.)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 30, 2011, 06:48:54 am
Thanks Curt. Now they know....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 30, 2011, 06:49:26 am
Quote
Tennessee center fielder Jae-Hoon Ha added to his defensive highlight reel with an over-the-shoulder grab at the warning track in the seventh inning, then by stealing a base-hit from Suns' first baseman Ben Lasater in the eighth, beating the ball to the gap at full speed.

"The kid (Ha) gets great jumps on the ball," Harper said. "He outruns it. He's been impressive to watch. He's one of the best center fielders I've seen."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 30, 2011, 09:59:54 am
Thanks from me too, Chris.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 30, 2011, 10:31:30 am
For all the articles and links AND the box scores--thanks Chris. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 30, 2011, 11:21:24 am
I'd love to see Vitters attend Camp Colvin this offseason. Besides the strengths gains hopefully upping his power outage, maybe being around a group of guys always pushing you to get that extra rep would instill a stronger work ethic toward improving his all around game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 30, 2011, 12:43:27 pm
I believe Vitters did attend CC this past winter.  He may have been limited in what he could do, what with the broken hand, but I can confirm that he was at the Mesa complex in mid-January with Colvin, Barney, and a bunch of others.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 30, 2011, 12:53:18 pm
For a second, I thought CC meant Community College.  Then I remembered that Josh Vitters probably wouldn't go to a community college.  Or any college.

Josh Vitters probably thinks CC means cottage cheese.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on August 30, 2011, 02:04:47 pm
Not to pile on, but nobody's mentioned the little bullet point summaries of the minor league games that Chris posts with the links.  These are my favorite part.  The Chris Report -- Simplified Cubs Prospect Watching for the Lazy Among Us. 

Thanks, Chris!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 30, 2011, 02:45:53 pm
Chris does a great job, and I really appreciate all the work he has done to post the box scores and the summaries.  Thanks, Chris.

But let's not lose sight of the fact that his real job is to drive JR off this board.  And so far he has totally failed at this.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 30, 2011, 02:53:21 pm
Wow, that DMF guy really piles on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 30, 2011, 03:27:34 pm
I'm of the ungrateful sort, so let me say how disappointed I am that Chris doesn't post minor league scores from October to March. 

Lazy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 30, 2011, 06:07:25 pm
Arizona Fall League

Carpenter
Cashner
McNutt
B Jackson
Lake
LeMahieu
Jeff Believeau (taxi squad)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 30, 2011, 06:12:11 pm
Javier Baez, Tony Zych, James Pugliese, and Michael Jensen added to Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 30, 2011, 06:35:06 pm
For all the articles and links AND the box scores--thanks Chris. 

One of the true highlights of the board.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 30, 2011, 06:43:03 pm
Rebel Ridling had two more hits tonight and another RBI , which gives him 79 for the year and his avg is upto .313 with just 80 K's in over 400 ab's, wth 20 HR's in his first year at Double A is damn impressive.

Last year when Brandon Guyer was playing for the Smokies, he was a year younger than Ridling is this year... and Guyer had an OPS 90 points better, while playing a quality CF, and stealing 30 bases... and neither Cub management nor many here were impressed.

Ridling: .313   .373   .524   .897   (2011 -- age 25) for the Smokies
Guyer: .344   .398   .588   .986 (2010 -- age 24) for the Smokies

Now, I think the Cubs made a mistake in trading Guyer, who this year has a .904 OPS in AAA... but I would be surprised in Ridling gets much respect, though I would call the guy up and give him regular playing time this September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 30, 2011, 07:24:25 pm
Jes , you are comparing stats from Guyers second year in Double- A versus Ridling's first season in Double-A not an even comparison. Plus in the second season Guyer's had 13 HR and 58 RBI's, Ridling this year has 20 home-runs and will finish with over 80 RBI's quite a advantage for the first year player as opposed to Guyer who was repeating Double-A.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 30, 2011, 07:38:57 pm
Blue, if you put a kid at age 15 in AA and leave him there for thee years and he hits .320 there with a .900 OPS at age 18, it would be absurd to minimize that performance because it was his 3rd year there.

The age is the relevant factor (and that ignores the fact that while Guyer was "repeating" in AA, he spent less than half of 2009 in AA, so it was not even a full "repeat" -- when Guyer was 23 he spent half a season in high A and put up numbers very comparable to what what he did in 2010 in AA: in a half season in Daytona in 2009  .347   .407   .453   .859, compared to .344   .398   .588   .986 with the Smokies in 2010... Ridling in his prior season at Daytona put up rather disappointing numbers)

Guyer was last year (and still is this year) a much more promising prospect than Ridling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 30, 2011, 07:46:16 pm
I agree.  I had Guyer ranked 6, if I remember correctly.

And it seems that the Rays also rated him rather highly.

But I won't rate Ridling that high.  He doesn't play as important a position, and he is not particularly fast, both important things in my rating system.

I would rather they promoted LaHair than Ridling, at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 30, 2011, 07:52:39 pm
I'd promote both of them.  And Pena would only see playing time would likely improve his rating for the purpose of a comp pick when another team signs him after he would turn down arbitration with a team which sat him for a full month.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 30, 2011, 08:14:12 pm
Not for the Cubs he's not, the Cubs chose Brett Jackson and Tyler Colvin over Guyer-- thats a fact.  Ridling plays a totally different position than Guyer and I never said Ridling was a better prospect. You compared Guyer's stats last year to Ridling's stats this year in some attempt to diminsh Ridling as a prospect.  Plus players make it to the majors at all different ages, each player is different and matures at different times.

FYI I am and was a Big Brent Guyer fan.

Again, Ridling is having a heck of a year and keeps posting "Quality" numbers as he advances in the Cubs organization and I asked, could Ridley be a player that surprises us as we go forward and is he an under-rated prospect?

Vitters is 2-3 tonight with 3 RBI's , games not over yet but Smokies are up 4-3. Ridling is 1-3 so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 30, 2011, 08:27:32 pm
Brent Guyer - Brandon's older, less successful brother.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 30, 2011, 08:33:46 pm
Ridling has put together a nice season.  He's been really hot this month.  His .260 or so for May-June-July, but had a wonderful April and again August. 

Obviously his age, lack of speed, and lack of defense make him an unlikely prospect.  And a much lesser prospect than Guyer was.  But he's had a good year.  Last year was mediocre, but he'd been hurt and had a late start.  He had a pretty good year in Peoria. 

Cubs don't have anything going at 1B, so you never know.  If he keeps producing, you never know. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 30, 2011, 11:09:56 pm
Thank you to all for the nice words. Not really needed; I enjoy posting things, but thanks anyway.

And I am sorry I couldn't drive JR off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 30, 2011, 11:12:55 pm
Daytona's DH rained out.

*

Jackson: 1-4, BB

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_30_nasaaa_iowaaa_1


Vitters: 3-5, 2B, 5 RBI, K, E


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_30_jaxaax_tenaax_1


Wallach: 1-1-3-3-6-2, 2 WP

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_30_peoafx_kccafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 30, 2011, 11:14:17 pm
DeVoss: 2-4

Golden: 2-4, 2B, HR, 3 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_30_vanasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 30, 2011, 11:21:57 pm
And I am sorry I couldn't drive JR off.

I think we all are.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 30, 2011, 11:26:17 pm
Not for the Cubs he's not, the Cubs chose Brett Jackson and Tyler Colvin over Guyer-- thats a fact.  Ridling plays a totally different position than Guyer and I never said Ridling was a better prospect. You compared Guyer's stats last year to Ridling's stats this year in some attempt to diminsh Ridling as a prospect.  Plus players make it to the majors at all different ages, each player is different and matures at different times.

Blue, you are quite mistaken if you think I compared Ridling's stats to Guyer's in order to diminish Ridling as a prospect (and I hope you will recall that I also posted I think Ridling should get a September callup AND playing time every day).

My point was pretty simply that when Guyer put up better numbers at a younger age and a more demanding position, it did not appear to do much to persuade either the Cub organization or many on this board that Guyer was a great prospect or was anything meaningful to give up in the trade for Garza, and given that I doubt that Ridling has persuaded many.

It had NOTHING to do with an attempt at diminishing Ridling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 31, 2011, 02:41:59 am
Fair enough.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 31, 2011, 03:30:27 am
Before anyone gets too excited by the possible PCL MVP LeHair, note that Russ Canzler just won the MVP of the International League.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on August 31, 2011, 06:34:31 am
What position (prone doesn't count) would you guys say would be the organization's greatest minor league strength right now??

I would have to go with 1B.  The org had some guys at 1B that have had outstanding years (or were recent high draft picks).
AZ Lge- Vogelbach and Shoulders
Boise-Hoilman broke the league HR Record
Peoria-Richard Jones is having an outstanding year
Daytona-Bour is having a nice year
Tennessee-Lalli, Ridling and Vitters
Iowa-LaHair

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 31, 2011, 06:45:39 am
If we're talking about genuine potential major leaguers, CF.  Jackson, Ha, Szczur, Zapata, Martin.  And there are some potential convert-to-CF guys, too, like Chen.  I'm sure Craig could name others.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 31, 2011, 07:12:01 am
Yes, what Jeff said. 

DeVoss would probably also be a CF guy, if it wasn't so crowded there.  And he will probably will end up there. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on August 31, 2011, 07:55:49 am
Taiwan Easterling. He is clearly the best CF prospect in the organization (named Taiwan Easterling).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: fratton on August 31, 2011, 10:15:20 am
If I recall right, Watkins has played Cf in the past, along with Crawford and Dunston.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 31, 2011, 10:26:37 am
Welcome to the board, fratton.... but wasn't that a weak post to spend your virginity on?

I mean, that point wasn't even sponge-worthy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 31, 2011, 10:29:28 am
Oh, the irony...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on August 31, 2011, 10:58:54 am
Oh, the irony...

LOL!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on August 31, 2011, 11:00:24 am
Hope you are able to find the "ignore" button, fratton.  You're gonna want to use it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 31, 2011, 11:59:23 am
I think that CF is by far the most crowded position in the minors, if, as Jeff says, you consider the likelihood of prospects making it to the majors.

Jackson, Ha, Ceasar, Silva, DeVoss, Zapata and Martin come immediately to mind, along with Easterling.  And there is a kid in the DR named Jeffrey Baez that they signed for a lot of money.  It is hard to judge a DR kid by stats alone.  (It is hard to judge ANYONE by stats alone, but especially those in the DR league).

And as someone said, Dunston Jr. is also considered to be a CF.

In addition, some of the CFs are close to the majors.  Jackson has a reasonable chance to break with the team in the spring, even if he is not brought up in September.  And Ha has handled himself well enough in AA that he may well be up before the end of next year, if he continues to show improvement.

My personal sleeper is one that is a long, long way away - Zapata.  Some scouts say he could be a 5 tool player who can both walk and steal bases.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 31, 2011, 04:51:59 pm
Matt Camp gets a 50 game suspension for his second  drug violation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 31, 2011, 05:46:02 pm
Camp is 27, putting up terrible numbers as a utility player in his 3rd go round in Iowa, and just testest positive for the 2nd time.

Is there any reason the Cubs should not simply cut him?  He has an OPS of .521 this year, which is worse than last year for the same team.... which was worse than the year before for the same team.  His best OPS in 6 minor league seasons is .720.

Seems like it should be an easy call.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 31, 2011, 06:20:06 pm
Szczur dropped to 7th:  2-3, HR, 3 RBI


Rhee: 7-6-3-3-2-7   (After 2nd:  5-2-1-1-1-7)

Rhee: Last 10 apps: 62-16 K/BB;  Last 4 apps: 26 IP, 5 BB, 32 K, 5 ER


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_31_tbyafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 31, 2011, 06:31:44 pm
Szczur has not helped himself after the promotion.

Is it simply that he has been over-matched at the higher level (high A at age 22)?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 31, 2011, 07:20:17 pm
There could be some underlying statistical reasons for this, but:

Szczur BABIP in Peoria = .336
Szczur BABIP in Daytona = .248
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 31, 2011, 07:34:38 pm
I suspect that one of the big reasons is that toward the end of his time in Peoria he started to hit a few HR and likely began putting more balls up in the air, which might not be a good idea for him.  With his speed, and looking at those figures, I would guess that he is a hitter who should generally try to hit the ball on the ground and only try to put it in the air in favorable situations.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 31, 2011, 08:11:14 pm
Is he going to the AFL?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 31, 2011, 08:22:54 pm
No.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 31, 2011, 09:25:12 pm
Jackson: 6-7-1-1-2-11

Coello: 3-1-0-0-0-4  (August total:  20-1/3 IP, 7 H, 6 BB, 30 K, 0.89 ERA)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_31_nasaaa_iowaaa_1


Szczur: 2-3, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_31_tbyafa_dbcafa_2


Smokies off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 31, 2011, 10:25:41 pm
Kirk's become a home run machine.

Hartman Peoria debut: 1-0-0-0-1-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_31_peoafx_belafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 31, 2011, 10:28:00 pm
Baez: 0-4, 2 K, E

Golden: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI

Zych: 1-0-0-0-0-1

Rosario: 6-3-0-0-1-6  ( 41-9 K/BB last 9 apps )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_08_31_vanasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 31, 2011, 10:37:42 pm
I thought Golden was supposed to have been highly regarded.... before the season started.

Anyone know what has happened to him?  Before tonight's 2-4 he had the following line: .231/.325/.394/.719 with 65K/27W and tonight gave him his 6th HR of the year.

Not particularly impressive.  He will be 20 in 40 days, so it's not as if he's young for the league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 31, 2011, 11:08:48 pm
Only thing i know is Jay Jackson is pitching much better than he has all year long.

Hopefully he's figured things out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 31, 2011, 11:13:25 pm
I don't know how highly regarded Golden was.  My impression was that he was an extremely raw prospect that had power potential.

So far, he has performed pretty much according to predictions.  The only new factor that I am aware of is that he seems to have a weight problem which could be very detrimental to his career if he is not able to keep it under control.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 31, 2011, 11:20:41 pm
Matt Szczur is probably worn out.

He went from football to full season baseball for the first time in his life.

Also, he's got 10 HRs this year.

Suck on that, Keith Law.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2011, 01:53:29 am
Quote
"Rhee did a great job," Daytona manager Buddy Bailey said. "He gave up a couple of runs (in the second inning) and then settled down to get us through the seven innings without using any relief pitchers. That's big in the first game of a doubleheader."

Rhee (8-7) tossed his fourth complete game -- three in seven-inning doubleheader contests and one in a June 15 game that was called after five innings. The right-hander struck out seven, walked two and allowed three runs on six hits.

Another bright spot for Daytona was the combined 4-for-6 hitting of Matt Szczur, who was moved into the No. 7 hole of the lineup.

Szczur belted a solo home run off the scoreboard in left field and had a two-run single to highlight Daytona's batting in the 6-3 win.

The center fielder is one of the top prospects in the organization. The Chicago Cubs gave him an additional $1.4 million contract in the offseason after he agreed not to pursue a pro football career.

The former two-sport standout at Villanova joined Daytona six weeks ago from low-A Peoria and has struggled a bit at the plate, but not Wednesday night.

"Moving him around the order really seemed to fit him," Bailey said. "Overall, he really had a nice offensive night -- four hits and four RBIs."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 01, 2011, 08:27:42 am
Matt Szczur is probably worn out.  He went from football to full season baseball for the first time in his life.  Also, he's got 10 HRs this year.   Suck on that, Keith Law.

So football was less draining than baseball?  Sorry, but that doesn't really seem to explain things.  Their first season as a pro is the first of "full season baseball" for most draft picks, yet I don't think Szczur's SECOND pro season performance decline is seen in most of them.

As to what Keith Law sucks on.... who cares?  I would much rather Law have been right that Szczur never hit for power than to have Szczur develop just enough power to show Law was wrong while sputtering at getting on base and setting the table as a lead off hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on September 01, 2011, 01:16:56 pm
Only thing i know is Jay Jackson is pitching much better than he has all year long. Hopefully he's figured things out.

Will be interesting to see what Cubs do with J. Jackson in terms of the 40-man or even a September call-up.  Jackson had six consecutive quality starts in August, with a 2.87 ERA and the 11 Ks in his most recent outing. 

Seems like he's now a serious candidate for the 40-man and, if so, maybe brass wants to give him a look in September.  I'd rather give Jackson a start or two in the Casey Coleman spot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 01, 2011, 01:46:09 pm
I think JJackson will be rostered on the 40-man. He is one of those type of guys that are attractive to other teams and could be plucked in the rule 5. He is pitching much better of late and I still have faith he can be useful for us at some point.

I still am not sold on Szczur. Many of you have him at the top of your prospects list but I have him maybe just getting into my top 10. He's got to show me a bit more dbls & triples power to get me more excited.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 01, 2011, 02:15:03 pm
It is difficult to rank young minor leaguers without including reports by the scouts that have seen them.  Otherwise, how could we rate Baez higher than LaHair?

I agree that at some point, the scout's projections have to be reflected in the stats, or they should be ignored or discounted.  But I am not yet there with Ceasar.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on September 01, 2011, 02:44:28 pm
Let's cut Sczur some slack.  It's taken Samardzjia around 5 years to make the adaptation to full time baseball.  Those guys came from cold weather universities which don't play as many games as those out west and south.  Throw in football season, and they haven't played nearly as much baseball as their contemporaries. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 01, 2011, 04:49:26 pm
I would
Will be interesting to see what Cubs do with J. Jackson in terms of the 40-man or even a September call-up.  Jackson had six consecutive quality starts in August, with a 2.87 ERA and the 11 Ks in his most recent outing. 

Seems like he's now a serious candidate for the 40-man and, if so, maybe brass wants to give him a look in September.  I'd rather give Jackson a start or two in the Casey Coleman spot.

Coleman should still get his starts to see if he can figure things out.  There are still other places to drop him in in that rotation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 01, 2011, 06:13:53 pm
I agree.  During September, they can go to a 6 man rotation if that is the only way to get innings for both.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 01, 2011, 06:23:35 pm
Why go to a six man?

Just sit a couple of starters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2011, 07:11:55 pm
Throw in football season, and they haven't played nearly as much baseball as their contemporaries.

NCAA football and baseball seasons don't overlap, Clark. Players can do both and not miss a game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2011, 07:16:38 pm
Quote
itto (PR): Starlin Castro or Javier Baez (if he reaches his potential)?


Jim Callis: Castro, because he's a shortstop and Baez will be a third baseman. Baez would have more power, but Castro will be a better all-around player. I'm not saying Castro will be THIS good, but he could become the next Derek Jeter.

....

Quote
Navin (Pasadena, CA): Would all four of Baez, Vogelbach, Dunston Jr and Maples slot into the Cubs top 10 prospects? Thank you!


Jim Callis: I do our Cubs Top 10, and haven't really thought about it. Baez will be near the top, along with Jackson, Szczur and McNutt (who gets a mulligan for 2011). Maples will make it, Vogelbach has a good chance and Dunston won't. We weren't nearly as high on Dunston as the Cubs were.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 01, 2011, 07:40:33 pm
Since the Cubs were actually spending their own money (or at least Ricketts' money), and Callis really doesn't have anything close to that on the line and also likely saw Dunston less, there is ample reason to believe that the Cubs would be in a better position to form a meaningful opinion of Dunston's value.

Since the Cubs are the Cubs and as an organization have an utterly pathetic track record, there is also ample reason to believe that regardless how much information the Cubs had, or how much was on the line regarding their judgement, that they would be less capable of coming to the right opinion regarding Dunston or anyone else.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2011, 07:46:12 pm
I assure you the people at BA talk to others who watch the prospects. It's not a coincidence that their pre-draft rankings closely mirror draft results.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 01, 2011, 08:12:16 pm
The first round certainly mirrors their predraft rankings.  Not so much after that.  It is literally impossible for BA to gather a lot of information on the thousand or more that are in the draft.

But most of all, predicting an 18 year old's improvement and future ability is hardly an exact science for either the teams or BA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2011, 09:00:55 pm
Oh I don't know. It's not really realistic to match teams with players past Round 1, but generally the players ranked high in places like BA, PG and elsewhere end up being picked high. Occasionally a team will like a player more than others which was apparently the case with the Cubs and Dunston.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2011, 09:03:28 pm
Szczur: 2-2, left game with unknown injury

Antigua: 6-1/3 -4-3-2-1-8   ( 54-11 K/BB over last 10 outings )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_01_breafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2011, 09:34:17 pm
Ha: 3-4,  Assist (home)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_01_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2011, 10:20:08 pm
Jackson: 0-3, 3 BB (2 IBB), K

Carpenter (first app since Aug 2):  2/3 -1-2-2-1-0


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_01_nasaaa_iowaaa_1


Peralta: 5-3-1-1-3-7

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_01_peoafx_belafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2011, 10:22:06 pm
DeVoss: 1-3, 3B, RBI, BB, 2 K

Baez: 1-2, RBI

Jensen: 1-0-0-0-0-1

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_01_vanasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 02, 2011, 09:19:29 am
Josh Vitters will replace Brett Jackson on the Mesa Solar Sox for the AFL season.   Vitters is listed as an OF.

Jackson supposedly has another commitment.  This does not mean he is being called up.

Carrie Muskat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on September 02, 2011, 09:44:03 am
Josh Vitters will replace Brett Jackson on the Mesa Solar Sox for the AFL season.   Vitters is listed as an OF.

Jackson supposedly has another commitment.  This does not mean he is being called up.

Carrie Muskat

That seems a bit odd.  I would think the Cubs would want Jackson to get as much experience as possible before next spring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 02, 2011, 10:54:22 am
Another commitment?

What.... has he promised to babysit a nephew?

The inmates are running the asylum.

Might be time to start looking for a trading partner to unload Jackson.  I know some (most recently Rozner) have ridden ARam for not having the desire to win which would have had him approve a trade to a contender.... but what of Jackson, who does not have enough desire to improve to play in the fall league?

This is sorry.  Very sorry.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 02, 2011, 11:45:32 am
Depending, of course, upon what his other commitment is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 02, 2011, 12:26:38 pm
True.  He might have to serve a jail sentence, and have no choice in the matter.

I seriously can't think of anything else that would satisfy me if I were in Cub management.

Not just because of what it says about his commitment to the game and the organization, but because of what it says about his smarts, scheduling a commitment at a time when he should reasonably have seen the prospect of playing in the fall league.

Okay, I  have thought of another acceptable commitment -- he is a compatible organ donor and is giving up a kidney to a person who would die otherwise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on September 02, 2011, 12:27:03 pm
It may be that Cubs have been able to place Jackson on a Winter League team somewhere, which would be more challenging. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 02, 2011, 12:30:20 pm
I don't know the schedules.... but any reason he couldn't do both?

I mean, other than donating a kidney.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 02, 2011, 12:52:31 pm
Perhaps he has a terminally ill family member. Perhaps he's working to complete his college education. Perhaps his wedding and honeymoon were already scheduled when the AFL rosters were announced. He may (or may not) have a perfectly valid reason for missing the AFL.

Since we don't know the reason, perhaps we should wait until we find out what it was before we worry about it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on September 02, 2011, 12:56:13 pm
Nah
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on September 02, 2011, 01:00:53 pm
The Bleacher Nation blog speculates it has something to do with the Pan Am games, which take place at the same time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 02, 2011, 01:46:51 pm
maybe he is planning to start chemotherapy? don't we need at least some facts before jumping to conclusions about this guy being "very sorry"?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 02, 2011, 02:08:09 pm
It could also be that he wants to give Jes to complain about.  He may not have him on ignore.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on September 02, 2011, 03:12:22 pm
It may be that Cubs have been able to place Jackson on a Winter League team somewhere, which would be more challenging. 

That was my first guess.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 02, 2011, 03:16:33 pm
One of the complaints I had over the way the Cubs handled Corey Patterson was that he played in both the AFL  and a winter league.  The poor kid was worn out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 02, 2011, 04:32:37 pm
To be honest, I would rather see Vitters in the fall league than Jackson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on September 02, 2011, 04:40:29 pm
Agreed...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 02, 2011, 05:14:40 pm
maybe he is planning to start chemotherapy? don't we need at least some facts before jumping to conclusions about this guy being "very sorry"?

Not me.  He can complete college classes later.  He can go on a honeymoon later.  A professional can care for an ailing relative better than he can.

And if it were needing chemo we would have heard of it AND it would have been referred to as tending to health concerns or some such.

Whether he needs a break from playing or will be worn out or the like are different issues.

If the organization he is playing with wants him in the AFL, he need to get his a*s to the AFL, and other commitments can be rescheduled.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 02, 2011, 06:03:39 pm
Yeah, he can always start his college classes mid-semester, find a new fiance and ask his dying parent or sibling to hang in there until the AFL season if over.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 02, 2011, 06:37:03 pm
Quote from: IowaCubs.com
TOOK ONE ON THE CHEN: RH Hung-Wen Chen was reassigned to double-A Tennessee today. Chen was 1-0 with a 3.00 ERA in five games with Iowa this year.
 
The Smokies put LHP Eric Jokisch on the 7-Day disabled list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 02, 2011, 07:11:57 pm
He can take correspondence school classes, marry his fiance and take the honeymoon after the AFL season is over, and recognize that since he has no nursing skills a professional would do more good than he could.

He chose to be a professional baseball player.  He demanded a large contract to become one.  He knew that if he progressed during the season as he and the team hoped and expected, it would be reasonable to to expect the team to want him to go to the AFL.

If he had been tearing up the minors to such a degree that his performance demanded a callup, and if the Cubs had made it to the post season, would he have bowed out of the playoffs, or left Chicago in mid-September because of his "prior commitment"?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 02, 2011, 07:58:42 pm
I blame A-Ram for this.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 02, 2011, 08:36:41 pm
The organizational culture obviously accepts both.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 02, 2011, 09:52:54 pm
The Pan-American games take place in Mexico in October. Considering Jackson played for the US in the prelims, this is surely where he is going.

The Cubs must've forgotten.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 02, 2011, 09:56:48 pm
Szczur not in the lineup.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_02_breafa_dbcafa_1


Lira: 6-3-2-2-2-9  (1.42 ERA last 3 starts)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_02_peoafx_belafx_1


Vitters: 0-3, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_02_tenaax_biraax_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 02, 2011, 10:22:54 pm
Boise's playoff chances take a hit.

*

Wells: 7-3-2-2-0-5 , 14-1 GO/FO  (Last 2 starts: 10 K, 0 BB, 26-3 GO/FO)

Burke: 2-2-1-1-1-4 , (Last 4 apps: 12 IP, 19 K)

Golden: 0-4, 2 K


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_02_vanasx_boiasx_1


Flaherty: 0-4, 4 K  (Last 10 Gms: 11 K, 0 BB)


C. Smith: 1-1/3 -4-7-4-3-1  ( Since trade: 10.80 ERA, 2.40 WHIP )

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_02_omaaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 03, 2011, 01:41:23 am
Tennessee and Daytona will be in next week's playoffs. Boise is in if they win their finale on Saturday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on September 03, 2011, 06:35:31 am
I really hate to focus on players that for lack of a better word --stink or who can't cut it but ...
this Carlton Smith fellow at Iowa might be one of the worst players we have ever had, or at least I can remember at the Triple A level-- how the heck did he advance that high in any organization ? I realize we picked him up in a trade (I think for Fukudome) but man he is awful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on September 03, 2011, 08:18:52 am

Flaherty: 0-4, 4 K  (Last 10 Gms: 11 K, 0 BB)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_02_omaaaa_iowaaa_1

Maybe the Cubs weren't stupid when they decided not to bring Flaherty up to the majors earlier this season after all?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on September 03, 2011, 08:26:36 am
Maybe the Cubs weren't stupid when they decided not to bring Flaherty up to the majors earlier this season after all?
The decision makers should have enough experience with players they have failed to develop to recognize yet another one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 03, 2011, 09:00:08 am
New Daytona Cubs logo for 2012

(http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/assets_c/2011/09/PRIMARY_FC-thumb-180xauto-21432.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on September 03, 2011, 11:18:35 am
Love that periwinkle blue.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 03, 2011, 05:13:53 pm

Is there any pitching help at Iowa?
Quote
A NEW ERA: The Cubs will set a new franchise record for the highest team ERA in a season this year. Entering play tonight, the team ERA is 5.58. Even with a shutout in each of the next three games, the mark would only drop to 5.46. Prior to this season, the record for the highest ERA in a season was 5.37 set in 1987 and matched again in 2000. This year's team has already set a franchise record for most earned runs allowed (756), surpassing the old mark of 741 set in 2000. The franchise record for hits allowed in a season is 1,436 in 2007. Coming into play tonight, the staff has allowed 1,405 hits this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 03, 2011, 06:22:01 pm
Boise wins its finale to make the playoffs.

.


Golden: 3-4, HR, 3 RBI, K   ( 4 HR, 11 RBI last 6 Gms )

Jensen: 2/3 -1-2-0-2-1, 3 WP


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_03_vanasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 03, 2011, 06:39:05 pm
Boise wins its finale to make the playoffs.

Golden: 3-4, HR, 3 RBI, K   ( 4 HR, 11 RBI last 6 Gms )

And did it with the pennant race on the line and when many teams would have been adding some of their top draft pick arms to the rookie league rosters.  I know it is a small ample size, but it is still encouraging, particularly considering that Golden's season there overall has been decidedly less than golden.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 03, 2011, 09:50:24 pm
Szczur: DNP

Kurcz: 2-0-0-0-0-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_03_dbcafa_breafa_1


McNutt: 4-6-4-4-5-2, 2 WP

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_03_tenaax_biraax_1


Iowa & Peoria rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 03, 2011, 10:32:38 pm
Quote
McNutt: 4-6-4-4-5-2, 2 WP

I saw the other day where Callis said he was giving McNutt a pass on this season.  Why would he do that?  I know he had some injury way back when and had some blister issues, but he hasn't been very impressive at all this year.  It's looking to me like McNutt is another live armed guy we'll probably wind up putting in relief in the next year or two.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 04, 2011, 06:34:10 am
Vogelbach interview:


http://www.nbc-2.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=6157688
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 04, 2011, 02:12:43 pm
Taiwan Easterling promoted to Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 04, 2011, 06:58:12 pm
Last day of the regular season.

*

Beeler: 4-2-0-0-0-2

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_04_qcsafx_peoafx_1


Tenn Gm 1:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_04_tenaax_biraax_1


Vitters: 1-2, HR, SF, 4 RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_04_tenaax_biraax_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 04, 2011, 07:04:48 pm
1B Richard Jones quietly had a pretty nice season with Peoria

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=1B&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=572957
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 04, 2011, 07:31:30 pm
The Vogelbach interview was encouraging, in as much as what it let us see of Vogelbach himself... but reaffirmed some of the doubts I had expressed regarding the Cubs efforts to sign him and other top prospects, being willing to delay until the final minute... and doing so without getting a dime's worth of concession out of the prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 04, 2011, 08:05:24 pm
Daytona:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_04_breafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 04, 2011, 08:08:08 pm
and doing so without getting a dime's worth of concession out of the prospect.


Players who wait until the deadline to sign do so to get as much as possible, not make concessions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 04, 2011, 09:35:18 pm
and doing so without getting a dime's worth of concession out of the prospect.


Players who wait until the deadline to sign do so to get as much as possible, not make concessions.

By the same reasoning teams which wait until the deadline do so to pay as little as possible, not make concessions.  The point is that Vogelbach signed for 1.6, it was reported from the start that was what he was asking for, he almost certainly had told scouts before the draft that was what it would take, it was "leaked" at least a weak before the deadline that there would be a deal at that amount, the Cubs very early in the process were rumored to have the deal under wraps... and yet the Cubs wait until the last moment.

Stupid.  Not on his part, but on the part of the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 04, 2011, 09:40:26 pm
By the same reasoning teams which wait until the deadline do so to pay as little as possible, not make concessions.

The teams have no choice; they can't force players to sign. Players who sign earlier almost always do so at cheaper prices. I don't know why all of them don't draw it out, quite frankly.

As for Vogelbach, we don't know exactly what the situation was. Maybe he held out for more than 1.6 and when he wasn't offered more was forced to take that exact number.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 04, 2011, 09:41:55 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 3 K   (1 for last 15)

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_04_omaaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 04, 2011, 11:03:00 pm
There may have been other points of contention in the contract negotiations.  For all we know, the Cubs might have gotten concessions other than contract amount.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 05, 2011, 06:41:14 am
As for Vogelbach, we don't know exactly what the situation was. Maybe he held out for more than 1.6 and when he wasn't offered more was forced to take that exact number.

There may have been other points of contention in the contract negotiations.  For all we know, the Cubs might have gotten concessions other than contract amount.

For both of you, and exactly what reason would there be to suspect that might be the case?


By the same reasoning teams which wait until the deadline do so to pay as little as possible, not make concessions.

The teams have no choice; they can't force players to sign.

Teams have the exact flip side of the choices prospects have, and both of them always have the option of walking away.  But in Vogelbach's case you had a kid and his family who appear to have very clearly made known the figure it would take to sign him.  That figure was rumored to be what he had agreed to very early in the process and was the very figure which was required to sign him.

But the Cubs dithered.  Stupid.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on September 05, 2011, 08:58:08 am
Is Vitters turning the corner and actually becoming a good prospect?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 05, 2011, 10:17:45 am
Bruce Miles with some Brett Jackson quotes courtesy of the Des Moines Register

http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/6236
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 05, 2011, 11:49:41 am
Is Vitters turning the corner and actually becoming a good prospect?

Turning the corner?

Like with a significant recent improvement?

Well, the first half of the season, he hit .291 with an OPS of .790.

In the second half of the season he turned things up to a BA of .275 and an OPS of .751.

Now, he did walk 6 more times in the 2nd half.... but that went along with 16 more K's and a dip in OBP from .326 to .319.

I am not saying that he is NOT a prospect.  He is still 22, and if he had been signed on June 15th right out of college and put up the numbers he did in the 2nd half.... ah, he still wouldn't look like a great prospect with those numbers.  http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=3B&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=519388
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 05, 2011, 01:40:40 pm
Jes - there is as much evidence that there were other negotiation issues with Vogelbach as there is evidence that there were NO other negotiation issues with Vogelbach.

Taking either position with certainty could only be done out of ignorance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 05, 2011, 02:14:52 pm
"He demanded a large contract"

Jes how do you know he DEMANDED a large contract? Man, you have got connections and know all this stuff. I feel sorry for your poor wife
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 05, 2011, 02:39:19 pm
jacey, In Vogelbach's interview he mentioned having made clear from the start what he and his family had agreed it would take to sign him, and that it was $1.6M.  I consider $1.6M to be "a large contract."  And I consider a statement of an inflexible position (which is what Vogelbach said he and his family made clear to the Cubs) to be a "demand."

From the start it was rumored that it would likely take $1.6M to sign him.  And then relatively early there were rumors that the Cubs had in fact come to an agreement on $1.6M, but that was not confirmed and not followed up with a formal announcement.  And then about a week to ten days before the deadline, it was AGAIN rumored that there was a deal at $1.6M, or that that was what it would take to get it wrapped up and that the Cubs would get it wrapped up.

All of these things were posted by others here in the 2011 draft topic.

Dave, there is NO evidence or indication of any kind that any issue other than the signing bonus was involved in the Voglebach negotiations.  You want to imagine that this means it is as likely those non reports mean there were such negotiation issues as it means that there were not.

That is a somewhat strange way of looking at things.  But I will accept that it is your way, and, apparently jacey's, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 05, 2011, 02:44:54 pm
Jes - as you say, there IS evidence that money was not the issue, and that both the Cubs and Vogelbach agreed early on that 1.6 million was acceptable to both.

Yet, he did not sign early.  I would think that a reasonable person would assume that there must have been some reason, unknown to us, why negotiations dragged on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 05, 2011, 05:53:18 pm
Teams have the exact flip side of the choices prospects have, and both of them always have the option of walking away.

If the Cubs don't sign Vogelbach, they waste a 2nd-round pick and miss out on a player they value highly.

If Vogelbach doesn't sign, he goes to a powerhouse program in his home state and can be drafted again in 3 years, perhaps in a higher slot.

Advantage Vogelbach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 05, 2011, 07:08:10 pm
I'm glad they signed Vogelbach.  I believe that if they had not signed him, they would have gotten a replacement pick next year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 05, 2011, 10:41:56 pm
Boise blanked in Game 1; will have to win 2 straight now.

.

DeVoss: 1-2, BB, K, E

Baez: 0-1, K

Golden: 0-4

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_05_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 06, 2011, 01:53:50 pm
My bad Jes....the comment i was referring to was your post about BJackson demanding the contract you said he demanded. How in the heck do you know he demanded anything??? Man, you sure know alot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 06, 2011, 04:05:05 pm
jacey, your mistake again.  The post you are talking about was my comment on Vogelbach, not Jackson, and the way I know what he demanded is as follows:

1) There is a video of an interview with him after the the signing which has been posted here, and in that interview he says he and his family decided before the draft that unless he got $1.6M, he was taking the scholarship offer.  So HE has said that was what he demanded, but, being naturally skeptical, that really was not enough, nor would it need to be, because in addition to that...

2) There were the early reports (again discussed here a couple of months ago) that it would likely take $1.6 to sign him.... and

3) There were the reports (again discussed here) about a week before the signing deadline that the Cubs were going to get him signed and had an agreement in place for $1.6M.... and

4) The final announcement that he signed for $1.6M.

You would also "know alot" if you just regularly read what is posted here instead of dropping in and seeing one post and concluding that the comments made in the post were guessed at with no basis.

Unlike some of the posters here who comb the internet for minor league box scores and news reports and listen to minor league games online (like Chris) and share with the rest of us what they find, or who have actual inside sources (like Dave with his scout friend) who pass on what he feels comfortable in passing on, or even like Curt who visit other discussion boards to see what they are saying there and then shares what they are saying.... I offer virtually nothing resembling original information, but I do try to absorb, reflect on and comment upon what is posted.

There really is some decent info here on the Cubs minor league system, if you just follow it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on September 06, 2011, 05:42:54 pm
Sarcasm-impairment is such a sad thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 06:41:00 pm
The Ignore feature, on the other hand, is such a happy thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 06, 2011, 09:36:34 pm
Daytona blows Game 1 and will have to win the next two.

.

Rhee: 6-6-1-1-0-5   ( Last 5 outings: 32 IP, 5 BB, 37 K, 1.97 ERA )

Szczur: 0-3, BB, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_06_dbcafa_dunafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 06, 2011, 09:39:37 pm
Nothing really new here, but still a fairly interesting piece on Szczur:


http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2011/09/06/star-in-sports-hero-in-life.html


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 07, 2011, 12:20:11 am
Boise's playoff performance was quite Cub-like.

*

Golden: 2-3, HR, RBI, K  ( 11 for last 34 w/ 5 HR, 12 RBI )

Zych: 1-3-3-2-0-0, HB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_06_boiasx_triasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 07, 2011, 09:17:51 am
Chris, what's your thinking about Rhee?  He's really come on lately, and during the second half.  July/August, 74K/21BB/72IP, those are pretty solid, and around a 1.5 GO/AO ratio, those all look pretty solid.  IIRC Ben Badler or one of the BA guys claims his fastball is reasonably fast now, up in the 91-93 range, or something like that?  Is that correct? 

He's pitched 6 innings or more in each of his last seven starts, which is pretty good consistency for a minor leaguer, not very common to see that.  At the same time he's still be reasonably hittable, his July-August it's 71 hits in 71.2 innings.  And he's continued to give up HR's.  10 HR's in 128 innings isn't bad, but I'm sure that's above average in FSL, and it's 5 each first half and second half.  So my suspicion is that while perhaps his fastball is reasonably fast now, I'm guessing it doesn't have a lot of movement? 

He's 22, not young but given a season missed not old either.  Will be interesting to see how it goes for him next year. 

Any sense of why he's been more effective lately?  Just a little more consistent velocity than he used to have?  Still a function of slowly recovering and building up after the arm surgery?  Or I wonder if he's changed his repertoire in terms of support pitches.  Originally he was said to have a good splitter, that was the pitch people noted as excellent pre-surgery.  I wonder if he dropped that afterward, and has now brought it back?  Or if he dropped it, and has taken a while to find something else that he can throw with consistency?  I'll be curious to see what the scouting writeup on him will be this winter. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 07, 2011, 10:23:47 am
Bleed Cubbie Blue

1. OF. Brett Jackson - AAA - Sept. 2011/Early 2012 - I like but don't love BJax. Does a lot of things well but nothing outstanding. Good spped/power combo. Draws a ton of walks which I love. The problem here is take out 2010's 8/19 start once he promoted to AA and this years hot 3 week start and your talking about a guy who has hit 250ish in AA. He K's way to much and does not have the ability to make consistent contact at this point. Jackson has been said to be more of a solid regular then an A.S. caliber player.

IMO the best we can expect from him is a Mike Cameron type offensive type player. The thing is I still have serious doubts about Jacksons ability to hit for average. His OBP should help offset his AVG but your looking at a 250-260 from what I see now.

2. RHP. Kenneth "Trey" McNutt - AA - Mid to late 2012 - Disapointing season. The talent is still there though. Plus FB/CB and his CU is actually far better this season. Part of his problem has been the HRA and being hitable. Very well could be written off to blister problems. K/9 rate has been coming back twoard 2010's #'s.

3. SS. Javier Baez - Best H.S. bat in the 2011 draft. Uber quick bat speed. Is the 1 player who profiles as a potential A.S. Has the most upside in the system right now and probably talent wise should be the #1 prospect. Will move to 3B but has plenty of bat for the move.  Before I rate him higher I would like to see what the PD is gonna look like. I know the #'s were ridiculously in favor for his BB/K rate but probably more of a product of being far more talented and H.S. pitchers working aorund him the above average PD.

4. CF. Matt Szczur - LA/hA - late 2013 - Cautiously optimistic about him. Szczur profiles as a dynamic true CF/leadoff guy. Barrels balls well combined with plus speed/athletism. Power maybe better then advertised.

I know many will want to see Szczur as the 1 or 2 on this list but I have slight reservations. I really Szczur and I know many were super high on his work at Perioa. The thing is as a 22 year old college product with a few months of pro expierence coming into to 2011 I expected nothing less then dominating. Some on this site have tried to compare his 2011 season with Mike Trout's. It's not the same. Trout was 18 years old fresh out of H.S. and dominated. Age matters. Again I like Matty but after his promotion to high A the AVG went down as did the BB and the K's went up. Power seems to be emerging but with everyhting I just said it's a small smaple size. I will be really watching what he does next yhear against adavanced pitching and I think 2012 will be the reall telling of the Matt Szczur story.

5. 3B. Josh Vitters - AA - 2013 - Good but not great season. Spent 20/21 over the last 2 years in AA. Very young and could easily have spent the last year and a half in lA/HA and be considered a prosepct. Still has BB issues. Power is coming around. Good hit tool. The ultimate talent is still there but right now profiles more as a solid average regular then an A.S.

6. OF. Jae-Hoon Ha - AA - mid/late 2013 - Tough out who has serious OBP issues which have been exposed against more advanced pitching this year. Has emeraging power but not sure it's better then 15 hr anually to go w/ average speed as well as a good arm but unfourtunatley profiles more as a 'tweener. Not enough range for CF and not enough power for RF. Needs to take a real step forward in power to be considered a above average ML regular. IMO should spend most of 2012 in AA focusing on drawing walks.

7. IF. D.J. LeMahieu - AAA - Early 2012 - Great swing that puts good wood on the ball consistently. Lack of power holds his upside down. At best could profile as offensive minded 2B but has footwork issues defensively. Doubled his Hr output this year but still just 4 hr. Right now I don;t see much difference between him and Darwin Barney at this point. Little better hit tool from D.J. better D/speed from Barney. LeMahieu has better power potential but right now it's just that....potential.

8. RF. Reggie Golden - 19 - SSA - 2016 - Actually a pretty solid season. Walk rate was better then I expected. Low BA and has K'd @ a 29.6% rate. Will need to work on this. Has big time power potential and great arm. Speed is above average presently but should slow down some as he matures. Has A.S. potential but is far from that right now. The quintessential boom or bust prospect. The pitcher friendly MWL will challenge him next year.

9. RHP. Dillon Maples - 18 - Top 50 talent got $2.5 million to sign as a 14th rounder. FB sits 91-94 and can touch mid 90s. FB command is lacking. CB is above average and spots it well. Falshes CU but has not used it much in games for obvious reasons. Athletic but mechanics need ironing out.

10. 3B.  Jeimer Candelario - 17 - DSL - Profiled him in March and said to watch. Very agressive ranking considering he is not even stateside yet but his numbers in the DSL are backed up by his scouting report. Switch hitting 3B has a good arm but needs work at the hot corner considering 10 E in 58 games. Plenty of time to work on that. Has the ability to hit for both AVG and power. Good bat speed and advanced feel at the plate. Sporting a gaudy  50/42 BB/K. PD won't be this good stateside but very promising.

11. SS/2B. Logan Watkins - 21- hA - early 2014 - Really like this kid. Very versitile, draws walks, and has plus speed. Flashed a little better power this. Has played all voer the diamond over the last 2 years (no 1B or C). Has a Marco Scutero feel to me. I know Scutaro is not a flashy name but he's been a very valuable player for some of his teams.

12. RHP. Ben Wells - 19 - AZL- 2016- Groundball machine. FB (89-93) w/ sink is solid and a promising CB. Still needs to spin it more consistent. CU is rudimentary. Reminds me of Zach Britton (BAL). More advanced then Britton at the same age.

13. RHP. Aaron Kurcz - 20 - hA - late 2014 - Potential for 3 above average pitches. Starts w/ a 90-93 FB, deceptive CB from a 3/4 arm slot. Also has flashed a plus CU.  Began career as a reliever but may stick as a SP. At the least he could be a power bullpen arm. Get lot's of SO and stuff plays up out of the pen.

14. Dae-Eun Rhee - 22 - hA - early 2014 - Finally seems to be back from TJS. Stuff is back, FB velo back to 91-94 and maybe more importantly CU, once considered the best in the system is close to form. K/9 has surged lately and command is solid at this point. My 2011 sleeper.

15. IF. Marco Hernandez - 18 - AZL - Athletic Mi who runs well and controls the strike zone well. Versitile and has teamed with Gioskar Amaya to form a very promising MI combo. Offers excellent bat speed and potential to add some power.

16. LHP. Austin Kirk - 21 - lA - FB sits in the 88-91 range. I've heard some say higher but still have yet to see any real eveidence of this. FB does explode in on hitters. 21 and in low A leave me a bit skeptical but hs some upside. I don't know what it is about him but I think better is to come thus the high rating even though the numbers have been falling all year. I liek Kirk right now but may not be much different then Chris Rusin when all is said and done.

17. UTL. Ryan Flaherty - 25 - AA/AAA - Sept 2011/mid 2012 - Still not a fan. 25 and still has not proved to hit advanced pitching. IMO best case senario is a UTL guy w/ some pop. Still very skeptical though that he's a ML. I know this opinion won't be popular w/ the guys on the BCB.

18. 3B. Dustin Gieger- I love this kid. Emerging power and solid defensive skills. I really like Gieger's upside.

19. 1B. Dan Vogelbach 18 - Boise (2012) - 2016 - Plus power and good hit tool. Has a decent eye for a H.S. kid. Really surprised it took $1.6million to sign. Has been compared to Prince Fielder on this site. Here is my take on those comps:

2 huge differences here. To start Fielder is not some fat kid. The guy is a vegan who eat's right. Prince is not out eating cheeseburgers affer games. This is not John Kruk! Fielder is far more athletic then what you think. Ok, let's even take that out Fielder who was the #8 pick, had an elite hit tool. K, no that uncommon. But his eye was elite for a H.S. kid. His power was elite, and I mean his present power.  Vogelbach was a good pick but he is in no way in Prince's class at the same stage.

20.  IF. Goskar Amaya - 18 - AZL - Adavanced baseball instincts, makes good contact, and controls the strike zone well. This is a guy getting a lot of helium who I profiled before the seaosn started. Runs well and has some loft to his swing. I know soome are higher on Hernandez right now, and rightfully so, I think Amaya's feel for the game may give him the edge.Versitile player who has played SS/2B/3B. He and Hernandez have been splitting MI work. I really like these 2 working together.

21. 2B/OF. Zeke DeVoss - SS-A - early 2014 - Has domintaed low minors thus far and should be coming from a top tier college program. Plus speed and great eye. No present power. If he sticks @ 2B could be a really nice offensive minded top of the order guy.

22. CF. Jeffrey Baez - 17 - DSL - Athletic with a projectable body. Plus-plus current speed and good arm to play CF. May slow down soome but has power potential. I like him.

23. RHP. Dallas Beeler - 22 - hA/AA - early 2013 - Low 90's FB that can touch 95. Solid CB but needs to work on CU. Command/Control is good but has been very hittable in AA. I think he will profile better as a 7th inning guy where his stuff will play up a tick and his control/command would also help his stuff play up. Will still be giving a chance to start but i htink the bullpen is where he fits best.

24. LHP. Jeff Beliveau - 24 - hA/AA - Mid 2012 - 88-91 Fb with plus life and a hard downer CB that generates swing and misses. Control/Command has improved. Looks like a good late inning option or worst case senario is a LOOGY.

25. RHP. Tony Zych - 22 - late 2011/early2012 - Profiles more as a set up man. Good FB sitting 94-97 and can touch 99 but can get flat. Inconsistent mid 80s SL.

26. RHP. Chris Carpenter - 25 - AA/AAA/ML - 2012 - Former starter moved to relief has a power arm bring plus FB that sits mid to upper 90's and a solid SL. Control/command is currently below average and will need to work on this to claim a late inning spot for 2012.

27. OF. Rubi Silva - 22 - lA/hA - Not impressed with this 1 million dollar investment. Has plus speed but not really much else as this point considering his profile. 3 % walk ratio  and 19 % k ratio are not what you would like to see from a 22 year old CF/leadoff in low A. Now I will concede this is 1st go around in pro ball but his Cuban stats back up these conclusions thus far. I rank him this high purely on the upside that is there but is so raw for a 22 year old in the low minors.

28. 2B. Matt Cerda - 21 - hA - mid to late 2013 - OBP machine has been playing 3B but profiles better as a 2B because of lack of pop. Some we rate him higher but his lack of power I think limits his ultimate value to a ML team. Love the PD though.

29. RHP. Jin-Young Kim - 19 - SSA/AZL - Got a big signing bonus but was roughed up in intructs and @ Boise but has posted better numbers once demoted to AZL. Stuff isn;t elite right now w/ 87-90 mph w/ some sink, and CB/SL/CU that are currently below average. Command was said to be his calling card. Not sure what to make of Kim right now. I may have him overrated at 29 right now.

30. RHP. Rafeal Dolis - 23 - AA - Late 2012 - Power arm out of the pen. Mid 90's FB with great sink but inconsistent SL. K/9 is down this year and walk rate is to high. I like him but needs to better control/command.

31. OF. Abner Abreu - hA - late 2013/early 2014 - Love this kid. Lean and athletic. PD needs a lot of work but power speed combo is exciting. Quick hands and looks a lot like Soriano at the same age. Let's not forget how good Soriano was over the 1st 8 years of his career. Lot's of upside but needs refining.

32. OF. Trey Martin - 13th rounder who got roughly $1 million less to sign then Dunston Jr. I do like Martin more at this point. Fellow CF with good speed and better idea of what he's trying to do at the plate. Could fill out and show more power.

33. RHP. Yao-Lin Wang - 20 - SSA - Low 90's FB with some sink. Sometimes flatens out though. Solid CB. Got 600k to sign and has put up good numbers this year. A player to watch for next year.

34. IF. Junior Lake - 21 - ha/AA - late 2013 (if ever) - Lake is an enigma. Has enough pure talent to rate easily in the top 10 and has shown some production the last 2 years but has some serious flaws. To start has the best arm strength in the Cubs system including pitchers. Has the size and strength to be a force on offense Power potential is there. Has to many holes in his swing as well as serious PD issues. Actually regressed in his 2nd go around in high A as far as bb% goes. Power has contined to grow this year. Will not play SS regularly in the ML but could easily profile as a 3B. Could also play 2B or LF. I don't think he profiles as a UTL player because he either claims an everyday spot or just can't play in the ML. His speed is better under way and rates as average and his base running skills play up. Will not steal 30 bases in the ML. Some will see him as higher rated prospect and I can see this but right now to many issues that more advanced pitching can expose.

35. OF. Garrett Schlect - 18 - AZL - Lefty who makes good contact and hasgood bat speed. I lik him and htink he's an under the radar guy.

36. LHP. Chris Rusin - 24 - AAA - Mid 2012 - Fringy FB sitting 88-90 but a great CB and solid CU. Good BB/9 and K/9 numbers split between AA/AAA. Could be a #4/5 SP but for my money he profiles more as a middle reliever/LOOGY. I know this won't be a popular analysis on this site but that's my take.

37. 1B/3B. Willson Contreras - 19 - SSA - Defense needs a ton of work. Does profile as an offensive minded 3B. Having a solid 1st season stateside. Current power is lacking but does have show some potential to fill oout and add power. Has been pretty hot after a slow start.

38 OF. Dong-Yub Kim - 21- AZL - Huge upside finally healthy but extremely raw. Has above average power/speed. Will need to work on PD as evident by 4/35 BB/K ratio. Has missed the last 2 years so pretty rusty.

39. RHP. Starlin Peralta - 20 - AZL - Promising arm who struggled in the MWL. Can touch 94 but secondary/control/command are lacking at this point. Love the build and may add velo but needs to refine his overall game. Still has some serious upside if..................................................

40. OF. Shawn Dunston Jr. - LH CF prospect w/ obvious ties to the Cubs. Maybe a bit overhyped imo. Very raw and long term power is questionable. Does have above average speed.

Let me touch on 3 player swho I'm sure will be asked about:

1st: 1B. Justin Bour. I know many will wonder why he didn't even make my H.M. but a 23 year old 1B in A ball who can't hit lefties screams non-prospect to me. I know he's had a good season but age matters as well as a player who is a 1B only who can;t hit lefties.

2nd: RHP. Nick Struck who did make my H.M. and brings good mid 90's heat but his secondary pitches are below average currently. Could be a decent bullpen arm if he can find a solid 2nd pitch.

3rd. RHP. Robert Whiteneck was putting together an eye opening seaosn until TJS surgery derailed it. Probably a year from pitching again and maybe 18-24 months before stuff/feel comes back. He was rising up my board but I want to see how he comes back.

Honarable Mention - LHP, Hunter Ackerman, LHP. Jeffry Antigua, OF. Micheal Burgess, C. Yaniel Cabezres, RHP. Alberto Cabrera C. Wellington Castillo, LHP Willington Cruz, 2B. Wes Darvill, LHP. Cameron Greathouse, RHP. Luis Lira, IF. Danny Lockhart, OF. Kyung-Min Na, IF. Carlos Penalver, RHP. Addison Reed, C. Neftali Rosario,  SS. Francisco Sanchez, RHP. Alexander Santana, RHP. Larry Saurez, RHP. Taylor Scott, SS. Blair Springfield.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 07, 2011, 05:22:17 pm
Bill Buckner says he'd like to manage the Boise Hawks.

It works better if you wait until a job is open before you start campaigning for it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 07, 2011, 06:56:39 pm
Hey dick head, uh, i mean jes...go back and look at post #3155 in this topic...i believe you said "he demanded" in reference to a discussion about Bjackson...
and again, how do you know that i just pop in here on the this board? how do you really know? YOU DON'T KNOW....i have been following this board and all previous boards with the others for well over 15 years.
Your poor poor wife....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 07, 2011, 07:28:32 pm
Quote
Chris, what's your thinking about Rhee?  He's really come on lately, and during the second half.  July/August, 74K/21BB/72IP, those are pretty solid, and around a 1.5 GO/AO ratio, those all look pretty solid.  IIRC Ben Badler or one of the BA guys claims his fastball is reasonably fast now, up in the 91-93 range, or something like that?  Is that correct? 


My thoughts recently had been that Rhee might be the best pitching prospect in the organization at this point. I haven't heard too much about what's changed but have been thrilled with his improvement and K/BB ratios. As you said, he does give up some hits and homers, but the other key ratios give me real hope. Not sure about Badler, but I know that BA's JJ Cooper said Rhee was reaching 94-95 in an earlier chat. Kevin Goldstein, on the other hand, just claimed Rhee's velocity is average while extolling his plus changeup. There's enough discrepancy to make me wait for a detailed report.

One thing about Rhee is that he's a young 22 in terms of experience. He basically had thrown about 25 healthy innings in the minors prior to this year. To me, he's more like 19 in terms of development.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 07, 2011, 07:40:19 pm
Flaherty and Vogelbach are way too low in the BCB list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 07, 2011, 08:05:30 pm
go back and look at post #3155 in this topic...i believe you said "he demanded" in reference to a discussion about Bjackson...

You are right.  I did say that Jackson "demanded a large contract to become (a professional ball player).  And when you asked how I "knew," "he" (without identifying the "he" you were referencing) "demanded a bid contract," right after three more recent posts of mine about Vogelbach's $1.6M contract, I assumed you meant Vogelbach.  That is my mistake, though a pretty reasonable one given the progression of the thread.

To address the substance of your point as to how I "knew" that, Jackson demanded a big contract, he was a first round draft pick, and he did not offer to play for free.  It has been reported many places that he got a signing bonus in the neighborhood of $1M.  That was it took to sign him.  That, by definition, is what he demanded to sign (unless you are suggesting that he offered to sign for NO bonus and that Hendry insisted that he take a $1M).  And for some strange reason I consider $1M to be a "big contract."

To suggest that he did not demand a big contract, or that it is presumptuous for someone to believe that he did demand a big contract, is very, very strange.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 07, 2011, 09:10:47 pm
Daytona evens their series sending it to a deciding Game 3.

*

Szczur: 1-3, HR, RBI, K

Antigua: 7-4-1-1-1-1  ( 3 runs or fewer in all 9 starts )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_07_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 07, 2011, 09:47:29 pm
To start Fielder is not some fat kid. The guy is a vegan who eat's right. Prince is not out eating cheeseburgers affer games. This is not John Kruk! - BCB


Someone needs to tell this guy that Fielder was some fat kid. In fact, Fielder was reportedly 300 pounds in high school, much heavier than any weight attributed to Vogelbach. Fielder has only gotten into better shape in the last two years.

I don't think he really knows how Vogelbach and Fielder compare at 18 either. Fielder was considered a 1st-round talent. Vogelbach was considered a 2nd-round talent in a loaded draft. And while there's no denying Fielder was highly regarded, his pedigree didn't hurt him either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 08, 2011, 03:12:01 am
Quote
Antigua, a 21-year-old right-hander* from the Dominican Republic, showed nerves of steel as he allowed just one run on four hits in seven innings. Antigua walked one and struck out a batter. He didn't overpower a Blue Jays lineup that can catch up to fastballs, but spotted pitches on the corners and changed speeds.

"I can't say enough about him," Cubs pitching coach Tom Pratt said. "He has the poise of a big leaguer. He pitched with confidence. He had command of all three pitches and threw them whenever he wanted."

For Bailey, there was no doubt where this game was won.

"For me, Antigua is the story of the game," Bailey said. "He did an outstanding job. When he got in a little trouble, he got out of it. He just pitched a real good ballgame."

Even after the game, Antigua was cool, calm and collected.

"It feels good that we won," Antigua said. "I just tried to throw strikes, pitch inside and not get too excited."


* Antigua's obviously a lefty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 08, 2011, 06:53:42 am
Antigua's sure been a surprising bounce-back guy.  There were times earlier when he seemed a guy who might emerge.  He's had an effective couple of months.  I wonder if he might have some James Russell type potential.  Maybe that sounds too unoptimistic, Ted Lilly would be the more optimistic end.  Not much life on the fastball, but can spot pitches often enough to have some success as a finesse lefty? 

The other thing that brings Lilly and Russell to mind is that Antigua has profiled as a HR-factory, relative to league norms, and that's been one issue that has been semi-continuous among the other inconsistencies. 

Seemed like last year and this spring he went through a series of injuries.  Not sure what, exactly, or how that factors his future.  Is his arm completely healthy now, and will stay so?  Was all of his Peoria ups and downs a function of arm, and now his good stretch reflects the real guy when healthy?  Is he a surgery just waiting to happen?  With another year to regain full health will he be even better and add some life to his fastball?


Whatever, he's got to be back on the radar to some degree.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 08, 2011, 08:34:04 am
Antigua was well regarded a couple years ago but seems to have gotten lost in the shuffle. He had some kind of arm injury last year. Can't remember what the issue was earlier this season. He's always had intriguing K/BB splits and while being quite homer prone, hasn't been all that hittable overall. He's averaged 8.7 K's per 9 over the last 3 years, so his stuff can't be that bad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 08, 2011, 01:37:57 pm
jes- i apologize to you and the rest of this board for going off. i should have used better judgement. but the fact still remains, you do not know jackson demanded a big contract. demanding as the dictionary says is "to ask for firmly". you don't know he did that nor do i know that he didn't demand a big deal. face it man, you do not know-none of us do except the Good Lord
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 08, 2011, 06:18:03 pm
jacey, if you believe that $1M is nor a big contract, or that Jackson told the Cubs he really didn't want the money and was willing to sign for $50 and a Zambrano autograph, and that Hendry is the one who insisted on giving him a $mill, yea, I can accept that.  And I guess I never should have commented on the size of his signing bonus.  But you are right.  I don't know how all of the zero's got in his contract.  The Cubs might have slipped them in without his knowledge, just to spend the money.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 08, 2011, 09:44:27 pm
Shocking night of comebacks for Cubs' affiliates.

Daytona scores 4 in the 8th to advance to the FSL championship.

.

Szczur: 1-4, RBI, 2 K, Assist

Abreu: 2-4


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_08_dunafa_dbcafa_1


Smokies come from 5-1 down to take Game 1.


Vitters: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI

Ha: 2-5, RBI, 2 K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_08_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 09, 2011, 02:01:07 pm
From baseball america...what's the point?  It's not like it's saving teams any money.

The explosion in spending occurred despite the best efforts of the commissioner's office, which leaned on teams harder than ever to adhere to an informal slotting system. MLB recommends specific bonuses for every pick in the first round and a flat maximum for every pick after the fifth round, and exerts political pressure on clubs to toe the line. This year's gameplan included getting teams to wait until the final day to officially extend an above-slot offer to most first-round picks and several college juniors (who have less leverage than high schoolers or draft-eligible sophomores).

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/news/2011/2612233.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 09, 2011, 03:19:39 pm
"This year's gameplan included getting teams to wait until the final day to officially extend an above-slot offer"

I don't believe that.  There is no doubt that the Cubs waited until the last minute just because they were stupid.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 09, 2011, 04:09:06 pm
"This year's gameplan included getting teams to wait until the final day to officially extend an above-slot offer"

I don't believe that.  There is no doubt that the Cubs waited until the last minute just because they were stupid.

I agree...everyone knows the cubs let idiocy guide them in all things.  They're sorta like Kim Jong-il, in that regard. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on September 09, 2011, 04:27:45 pm
Kim Jong-il is in the running for GM, I hear.  He's just behind Friedman and ahead of Kim Ng.   Alphabetically.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 09, 2011, 04:55:00 pm
Kim Jong-il is in the running for GM, I hear.  He's just behind Friedman and ahead of Kim Ng.   Alphabetically.
And if something happened to him we wouldn't have to worry about his successor.   His son would automatically take over.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on September 09, 2011, 05:27:31 pm
And if something happened to him we wouldn't have to worry about his successor.   His son would automatically take over.

All he'll draft are short stops.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 09, 2011, 09:30:15 pm
Smokies go up 2-0 in their best-of-five.

*

Ha: 2-5, 2B, K

Vitters: 1-4, RBI, K

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_09_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 09, 2011, 10:14:42 pm
"This year's gameplan included getting teams to wait until the final day to officially extend an above-slot offer"  I don't believe that.  There is no doubt that the Cubs waited until the last minute just because they were stupid.

Two questions:

1) Weren't there also prospects signings which were well above slot which were announced well before the final day?

2) Am I misunderstanding things, or am I right in understanding that "plan" to be one in which teams extending above slot offers could also have them approved before the last day?  If "the plan" was to get teams to voluntarily delay formally extending the offers, it sounds as if  "the plan" was not to deny approval of an offer (has Selig EVER done that?) or even to delay it until the last day.... meaning that a team could have acted in its own best interests and improved its interests.

And one observation, regardless the reason for what happened with much of anything, the safe bet is generally to explain any action by the Cubs as being a result of management stupidity.  History has shown that if you could have that as a standing bet, you would be sitting pretty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 09, 2011, 11:13:42 pm
Daytona takes Gm 1 of the FSL championship:


Szczur: 1-3, 2B, BB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_09_sluafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 10, 2011, 10:48:41 pm
Daytona one game away from a title.

Szczur: 3-4, 2B, 2 RBI, 2 SB


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_10_sluafa_dbcafa_1


Smokies go up 2-0

.

McNutt: 5 IP, 2 R

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_10_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 11, 2011, 01:12:35 am
The Smokies actually won their series as it was a best of three.

They advance to the championship series.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 11, 2011, 10:01:12 am
Quote from: Carrie Muskat
  Tennessee defeated Chattanooga, 10-4, on Friday in Game 2 of the Southern League North Division Series. The Smokies scored six times in the bottom of the second, and now are one win from the Southern League Championship Series. Tennessee overcome a 4-0 deficit as Rebel Ridling homered to lead off the second. Steve Clevenger and Junior Lake hit back to back singles, and Nate Samson was safe on an error to load the bases. Nelson Perez drew a walk to force in a run and Lake scored when a balk was called on Lookouts starter Chris Withrow. Jim Adduci walked to load the bases again, and two batters later, Blake Lalli ripped a two-out double down the right field line to drive in three and open a 6-4 lead. Josh Vitters added a RBI single in the fifth and Clevenger hit a two-run single in the seventh. Oswaldo Martinez (1-0) picked up the win in relief, striking out five over three innings.

The two teams travel to Chattanooga and will resume the best of five series on Saturday. Trey McNutt will start for Tennessee against Chattanooga’s Allen Webster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on September 11, 2011, 10:20:59 am
http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110911&content_id=24532118&vkey=news_t553&fext=.jsp&sid=t553
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 11, 2011, 11:10:33 am
The two teams travel to Chattanooga and will resume the best of five series on Saturday.
That blog entry is no longer there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 11, 2011, 12:26:33 pm
The two teams travel to Chattanooga and will resume the best of five series on Saturday.


They did resume on Saturday and McNutt did pitch. The Smokies won which clinched the series.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 11, 2011, 08:14:52 pm
The D-Cubs are 3 outs away from a title.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 11, 2011, 08:44:35 pm
Daytona is the FSL champ.

*


Szczur: 1-2, 2 BB

Rhee: 6-4-2-2-3-5  (After 2nd: 4-0-0-0-2-4)


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_11_dbcafa_sluafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 11, 2011, 09:38:42 pm
Nice.  Fun to have the season end well for those kids.  Szczur with a couple of walks, crazy.  delValle with a good game on Saturday.  Kurcz has had some good games.  Rhee's got a chance.  Nice ending. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on September 11, 2011, 09:43:21 pm
The second half winner usually wins these things. Nice to see the Cubs come through.

Also nice to see Sczur come up big.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 12, 2011, 04:25:35 am
Dae Eun Rhee:


(http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/assets_c/2011/09/cubs10912-thumb-260x260-21745.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 13, 2011, 08:44:38 am
Iowa pitching coach Mike Mason on Jay Jackson, Alberto Cabrera, and Chris Rusin

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110912&content_id=24590946&notebook_id=24590952&vkey=notebook_chc&c_id=chc&partnerId=rss_chc

There's also a recap of John Gaub's outing last night.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 14, 2011, 09:59:51 am
Nice story on Blake Lalli and the Smokies at Mobile series that starts tonight.  He sounds like a future manager.


http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2011/sep/13/lalli-focused-on-helping-smokies-any-way-he-can/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 14, 2011, 01:40:38 pm
Quote from: Carrie Muskat
The Cubs’ Instructional League gets underway Thursday in Mesa, Ariz., which means several of the team’s Draft picks as well as some other Minor League prospects will get some extra work and playing time. They start playing games Sept. 23 in the Phoenix area, with the Cubs playing at their Fitch Park complex. Among the players scheduled to participate include No. 1 pick Javier Baez and Shawon Dunston Jr., son of the former Cubs shortstop.

Twelve of the Cubs’ first 16 Draft picks are expected to get a head start on their pro careers, including second-round pick Dan Vogelbach, a first baseman from Bishop Verot (Fla.) High School. Also expected to participate are infielder/outfielder Zeke DeVoss from Miami; right-hander pitcher Tony Zych of Louisville; right-handed pitcher Tayler Scott of Notre Dame (Ariz.) High School; catcher Neftali Rosario of Puerto Rico Academy High School; and outfielder Garrett Schlecht of Waterloo (Ill.) High School. Others on the list include infielder Daniel Lockhart of Hebron Christian Academy (Ga.); right-handed pitcher Dillon Maples of Pinecrest (N.C.) High School; catcher Justin Marra of Michael Power St. Joseph High School; catcher Rafael Lopez of Florida State University; and left-handed pitcher Andrew McKirahan of Texas.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 14, 2011, 01:53:35 pm
Twelve of the Cubs’ first 16 Draft picks are expected to get a head start on their pro careers...

If starting play on September 23rd gives a draft pick a "head start," wouldn't starting play in mid-June give an even bigger head start?

Just wondering....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 14, 2011, 02:27:05 pm
Why stop at June.  Wouldn't they get an even better head start if they started their pro career in February, along with regular spring training?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 14, 2011, 02:59:52 pm
Jes, it's my understanding that you are an attorney. Were all of your cases resolved on the first day?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 14, 2011, 03:38:19 pm
Cubsin, I used to be an attorney.  No longer practicing law (or doing much of anything), and no cases were not resolved on the first day.  That fact is irrelevant to the question of whether a player and ream would benefit from early signing.

dave, it would be a bit hard to sign players before they are drafted.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 14, 2011, 04:32:39 pm
Practically all of the high-ceiling prospects were signed right at the deadline, thanks to "Larry" Bud's efforts to keep bonus amounts away from agents. So you shouldn't blame either the teams or the prospects for the delays.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Santo4HofF on September 14, 2011, 04:35:19 pm
Why are you not still a practicing attorney Jes?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 14, 2011, 05:47:05 pm
dave, it would be a bit hard to sign players before they are drafted.

Then play them before they sign.  The important thing is to jump start their career.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 14, 2011, 06:02:33 pm
Practically all of the high-ceiling prospects were signed right at the deadline, thanks to "Larry" Bud's efforts to keep bonus amounts away from agents. So you shouldn't blame either the teams or the prospects for the delays.

That is a conclusion which is somewhat inconsistent with the fact that ANY of them signed well before the deadline, but who is to blame is a different issue entirely from the point I was making, that being simply that the two months of development, instruction and evaluation is meaningful.


Why are you not still a practicing attorney Jes?

License was suspended.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Santo4HofF on September 14, 2011, 06:47:11 pm
Isn't the terrm disbared?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 14, 2011, 06:56:15 pm
No.

You asked why I wasn't practicing.  The answer to that is that my license was suspended.  Now a year and a half after the suspension, I was disbarred, but the reason I am not still practicing is that the license was suspended.

But your second question indicates you already knew the answer when you asked the first one.  Do you really think you are going to embarrass or bother me by asking?  And, yes, I have mentioned it here before.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 14, 2011, 11:12:13 pm
Smokies drop Game 1 of the title series:

Ha: 2-4, HR, RBI

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_14_tenaax_mobaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 15, 2011, 01:41:46 pm
jes- you on TNCare yet?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 15, 2011, 01:47:41 pm
Quote from: Carrie Muskat
Jackson, Beliveau to play for Team USA
 
 
 Cubs prospects Brett Jackson and Jeff Beliveau will play for Team USA in the 2011 World Cup and Pan Am games next month. The team will compete in both the IBAF Baseball World Cup in Panama City, Panama, Oct. 2-15, and the Pan American Games in Guadalajara, Mexico, Oct. 20-25. The U.S. roster features 24 players not currently on MLB 40-man rosters. Jackson currently ranks 36th on MLB.com’s Top 50 prospects list and played in 2010 in the Pan Am qualifier.
 
 
 Ernie Young will manage the U.S. team in Panama and Mexico, and will be joined on the coaching staff by pitching coach Kirk Champion, hitting coach Leon Durham, and assistant coaches Jay Bell and Roly de Armas.  The Pan Am Team will gather in Cary, N.C., at the USA Baseball National Training Complex to train from Sept. 27-29.  Team USA has defeated Cuba in the gold medal game of each of the last two World Cup finals.  First round action kicks off on Oct. 2 against Japan at Rod Carew Stadium.
 
 
 At the conclusion of the World Cup on Oct. 15, the U.S. will travel to Lagos de Moreno, Mexico, for the Pan American Games baseball competition.  The first game will be Oct. 20 against the Dominican Republic.  The U.S. last fielded a pro team at the Pan Am Games in 1999.
 
 
 Beliveau began the season at Class A Daytona and posted a 0.52 ERA in 12 games, giving up one earned run over 17 1/3 innings. He was promoted to Double-A Tennessee and went 6-1 with three saves and a 1.89 ERA in 41 games, striking out 69 over 57 innings. Opposing batters hit .183 against the lefty, who was the Cubs’ 18th round pick in 2008. Jackson batted .274 with 20 homers, 23 doubles at Tennessee and Iowa combined.
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 15, 2011, 01:59:11 pm
Justin Berg will undergo Tommy John surgery on his right elbow on Friday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 15, 2011, 02:14:33 pm
jes- you on TNCare yet?

I have the same insurance now that I have had for the last 20 years.... none.  I also am no longer in Tennessee.  I also don't know why it should be any concern or business of yours, and if it were a matter of genuine concern, my profile includes my email.  Any further personal questions to me which seem to have no relevance to anything being discussed here will be ignored.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 15, 2011, 10:42:26 pm
Tennessee's in a big hole now after falling in 11.

*

Vitters: 0-5, 2 K

Beliveau: 2-0-0-0-0-3

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_15_tenaax_mobaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 16, 2011, 08:49:17 am
Jeff Beliveau joining Team USA created an AFL opening for Marcus Hatley
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 16, 2011, 01:37:18 pm
disbarred
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 17, 2011, 10:07:23 pm
The Smokies rally in the 8th to stay alive:

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_17_mobaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 18, 2011, 08:07:59 pm
Tennessee's beaten for the SL title.

*

McNutt: 4-1/3 -2-2-2-4-3

Ha: 2-5, HR, 3 RBI, 3 K

Vitters: 0-4, K  ( 1-17, 4 K's in the series )


http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2011_09_18_mobaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 18, 2011, 08:52:54 pm
Vitters: 0-4, K  ( 1-17, 4 K's in the series )

An obvious pressure performer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 18, 2011, 10:40:00 pm
17 at bats is certainly enough to form an accurate opinion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 19, 2011, 02:56:22 am
An 0 for 3 is enough to convince Jes that any Cubs' prospect was born to fail.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 19, 2011, 05:34:53 am
Cubsin, I have actually been one of Vitters' strongest defenders here, from the time he was drafted thru.... about the middle of this season.

The standard defense for Vitters has been that when you adjust for his age, he is actually doing quite well, but he is now 22, and while he is still somewhat young for his league, that defense is becoming increasingly weak.  He has not offensively dominated at any level, appears to have difficulty making adjustments (as indicated by problems he has any time he tries to alter his approach and generally with each promotion), seems to be about as smart as a box of rocks (as indicated by his interviews), is something less than serious about the game (an impression formed by some of the scouting evaluations and other comments about his approach), and his ability to perform under pressure would seem to be reflected by something more than just his last 17 AB when he has 229 AB in 1547 PA appearances in the minors, while generally batting in the middle of the order.

Am I writing him off?

No.

Do I think it is now fair to post digs at his under-performance?

Certainly.

Do I think any or all Cub prospects are born to fail?

Such a comment indicates you have a very short memory or no memory... or haven't been reading here long.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 19, 2011, 10:08:24 am
BA's prospect rankings start today with the Arizona League.

Mesa with two in the top 20: Marco Hernandez 6th and Gioskar Amaya 9th


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/league-top-20-prospects/2011/2612367.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on September 19, 2011, 12:08:27 pm
Here are the BA scouting reports on Hernandez and Amaya:

MARCO HERNANDEZ SS/2B, CUBS
The 2008 AZL Cubs had two highly touted 18-year-old Latin American middle infielders in Junior Lake and Starlin Castro, who split time at shortstop and ranked on our Top 20 Prospects list. That scenario repeated itself three years later, as Hernandez and Gioskar Amaya took turns at short and ranked among the best infielders in the league.

Hernandez is more likely to remain at shortstop than Amaya. Hernandez has a more athletic frame and good range. He also has plus arm strength but needs better accuracy on his throws.

A switch-hitter, Hernandez currently is better from the left side of the plate. He has good bat speed and contact skills, and he shows the ability to bunt for a hit. He should have at least gap power and has plus speed, though he's still learning how to use it on the bases.

 9. GIOSKAR AMAYA INF, CUBS
Amaya spent as much time this year at second base and third base as at shortstop, and that may define his role moving forward. He has the glove and natural instincts to play any position but lacks the quickness and arm to play shortstop on an everyday basis.

There's little question about Amaya's bat, as he hit .377/.417/.510 and led the AZL with 77 hits in his first season Stateside. A solid line-drive hitter with gap power, he has strong hands and a good swing. He has above-average speed but may slow down slightly as he gets bigger.

Amaya is a smart, instinctive player and made great strides in learning the English language this year. He should be able to move quickly through the system.

 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 19, 2011, 12:45:27 pm
A switch-hitter, Hernandez currently is better from the left side of the plate.


To my knowledge, Hernandez only bats from the left side. Don't know where Mitchell got the switch-hitting thing from.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQygnbB2h5U
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 19, 2011, 01:14:44 pm
That would certainly explain why he's better from the left side of the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 19, 2011, 01:51:02 pm
"seems to be about as smart as a box of rocks" 

now isn't that the pot calling the kettle black
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 19, 2011, 02:23:35 pm
jacey1, ten of your last 20 posts have been personal digs at me.  Ten of them.  And at least three more were before your last 20.

I am wondering whether you think that will drive me away, whether it makes you feel superior, whether you are marking territory like a dog p*ssing on fire hydrants, whether you think it is particularly amusing, or that you think it will somehow change me.  And I comment on this not because I am bothered by it (by all means, keep it up if it makes you feel good), but only because I can not resist the irony in pointing it out after your last post....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 19, 2011, 02:25:42 pm
A switch-hitter, Hernandez currently is better from the left side of the plate.


To my knowledge, Hernandez only bats from the left side. Don't know where Mitchell got the switch-hitting thing from.


According to ArizonaPhil, Hernandez has been a switch hitter since instructional league of last fall.  The Cubs media guide just hasn't caught up with it yet.

He says that Hernandez has good power from the left side of the plate, but is strictly a slap hitter (ala Kessinger) from the right side.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 19, 2011, 02:49:10 pm
Well that explains it. Doesn't explain why the Cubs would want him to continue hitting RH'd if he's a slap hitter from that side.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 19, 2011, 03:17:03 pm
Perhaps he is even worse hitting left handed against left handed pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 19, 2011, 03:35:58 pm
If Phil is right, they started switching him after a year in the DSL where he had 250 at-bats total. That's probably about 60 against left-handers. Seems abrupt to change him after that few at-bats, particularly considering how good he was from the left side.

This year his OPS against lefties was just .528 and he failed to draw a walk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 19, 2011, 04:46:19 pm
It may be that they saw him once or twice in batting practice, or they may even have scouted him before they signed him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 20, 2011, 01:23:50 pm
dave, while your point is understood, the Cubs have a spotty player development record at best.  It is poor enough that second guessing such decisions seems perfectly reasonable, and that not doubting them would actually make little sense.

Chris did not say it was a mistake.  He actually made a fairly reserved comment which was perfectly reasonable based on the limited information he has, and said that it, "Seems abrupt to change him after that few at-bats, particularly considering how good he was from the left side."

It may not be abrupt.  And the guy may turn into the second coming of Micky Mantle because of this move... but it sure SEEMS abrupt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 20, 2011, 01:28:56 pm
Second guessing a specific decision, when you have absolutely NO evidence one way or the other, is foolish, regardless of the past record of the decision maker.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 20, 2011, 05:25:53 pm
Second guessing a specific decision, when you have absolutely NO evidence one way or the other, is foolish, regardless of the past record of the decision maker.

Not at all.

It may be mistaken, but that does not make it "foolish."

Now, if Chris had said the move was "obviously going to fail and was stupid and was clearly premature and that the guy would be in the majors already if the Cubs hadn't forced him to start switch-hitting," well, then I would agree with you.  THAT kind of second-guessing of a specific decision, and doing so from a position of considerable lack of information, and predicting that the outcome would have been different if the decision had been different (the kind of second-guessing which is routine in the today's game thread when attacking a particular pitch selection or lineup move or in-game decision) certainly is foolish.

But to QUESTION a move (which is all that Chris did), and to offer a sensible basis for that question, is not at all foolish.

Actually seems fairly well-reasoned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 20, 2011, 06:11:18 pm
Bryan LaHair and Jeff Beliveau have been named minor league player and pitcher of the year respectively.

One organization winning both awards is a noteworthy accomplishment.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 20, 2011, 06:22:37 pm
LOL
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 20, 2011, 06:29:22 pm
Doesn't say much for your minor league organization when a 28 year old journeyman and a Double-A reliever are your top hitters and pitchers of the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 20, 2011, 06:43:58 pm
Bryan LaHair and Jeff Beliveau have been named minor league player and pitcher of the year respectively.

One organization winning both awards is a noteworthy accomplishment.

Weren't those awards just for the Cub organization?  I mean, if the awards are just for the best minor league pitcher and position player in the Cub organization, it would really be bad if they had to name a player in some other team's organization, wouldn't it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 20, 2011, 07:04:34 pm
Doesn't say much for your minor league organization when a 28 year old journeyman and a Double-A reliever are your top hitters and pitchers of the season.
JR, I'm sure you are right.  Those would not be MiLB awards.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 21, 2011, 11:57:07 pm
ArizonaPhil

The 47-man AZIL Cubs roster features eight players who will be making their professional debut, including 2011 11th round draft pick ($1.275M bonus) OF Shawon Dunston, Jr (Valley Christian HS - San Jose CA), 14th round draft pick ($2.5M bonus) RHP Dillon Maples (Pinecrest HS - Southern Pines, NC), 15th round draft pick catcher Justin Marra (Canadian Junior National Team), and 35th round draft pick RHP Ian Dickson (Lafayette College), recently-signed NDFA RHP David Henrie (Trinidad State JC), 16-year old switch-hitting $1.6M Venezuelan bonus baby catcher Mark Malave, 16-year old $1.1M Dominican bonus baby SS Luis Acosta, and 16-year old Curacao LHP Christopher Pieters ($350K bonus).

Another seven players will be making their U. S. debut, including DSL Cubs RHPs Jose Arias and Alexander Santana, 3B Jeimer Candelario, SS Carlos Penalver, and outfielders Jeffrey Baez and Eliecer Bonne (a 24-year old Cuban defector who signed with the Cubs this past spring), and 17-year old Italian catcher Alberto Mineo (who hit 270/333/338 in 31 games played at the MLB Australian Academy Program this past summer).

Besides Dunston, Jr, Maples, Marra, and Dickson, 13 other 2011 Cubs draft picks at Instructs include SS Javier Baez (1st round), 1B Dan Vogelbach (2nd round), 2B-OF Zeke DeVoss (3rd round), RHP Tony Zych (4th round), RHP Tayler Scott (5th round), C Neftali Rosario (6th round), OF Garrett Schlecht (9th round), INF Danny Lockhart (10th round), C Rafael Lopez (16th round), LHP Andrew McKirahan (21st round), 1B Rock Shoulders (25th round), RHP Michael Jensen (26th round), and OF Taiwan Easterling (27th round).

In addition, 25-year old 6’4 245# OF Matt Spencer is being converted to a LHP. Spencer was a two-way player (LHP-OF) in HS and in his first two years at the University of North Carolina (before transferring to Arizona State), so he is not a stranger to the mound.

Spencer was one of three players acquired from the Oakland A’s in the Jake Fox deal a couple of years ago, and he played 1B and all three OF spots for Tennessee and Iowa in 2011, hitting a combined 246/319/419 with 14 HR & 70 RBI between AA and AAA (but only 188/260/246 in 27 games at AAA). He also got into two blow-outs as a pitcher (2.0 IP, 1 H, 1 R 3 BB, 1 K).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 22, 2011, 01:02:57 am
I hope the quality of the instruction is up to the level of the quality of the prospects. Dillon, J. Baez, Malave, Candelario and Vogelbach (at least) appear to have first-round talent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 22, 2011, 02:43:58 pm
Interesting that they have three 16 year olds at the instructional league.  ArizonaPhil doesn't remember any 16 year olds there before this.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on September 22, 2011, 07:51:22 pm
Interesting that they have three 16 year olds at the instructional league.  ArizonaPhil doesn't remember any 16 year olds there before this.
Best to get to them before they can develop good habits.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 23, 2011, 08:04:40 pm
Instructional league has begun.

Shawon Dunston with a 2 run single on his first professional pitch seen.  Also with a home run later in the game.

Vogelbach with a tape measure home run to right.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 23, 2011, 08:06:52 pm
Thanks for the info and updates, Dave.  I sometimes go to Az Phil's stuff, but not consistently.  So it's really nice to have highlights mentioned.  Thanks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 23, 2011, 08:15:33 pm
Dunston swung at the first pitch he ever saw?

He's a chip off the old block.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 23, 2011, 08:18:41 pm
Phil's site also mentions that Rock Shoulders has a torn meniscus in his knee and will need surgery.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 23, 2011, 08:56:41 pm
Dunston swung at the first pitch he ever saw?

He's a chip off the old block.

Wast the pitch anywhere close to the strike zone?

Had it bounced more than once before he swung at it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on September 23, 2011, 09:14:06 pm
Dunston swung at the first pitch he ever saw?

He's a chip off the old block.

That's exactly what I was thinking.

Was the homer on the first pitch, too?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 23, 2011, 10:26:04 pm
Phil didn't say.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 24, 2011, 08:47:44 pm
Today's Instructs action from Phil:

*

Ja Baez: 2B, 2 K

Big Money: 2-3, RBI, K

Candelario: 1-4, E

Je Baez: 1-2, RBI

Dunston: 1-3, RBI, K


Zach Rosscup pitched again after being MIA for months. Struggled.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 25, 2011, 01:49:07 pm
Quote from: Wayne Gretzky
I think Trevor's going to play next year in Boise in single A ball; they're going to try him in centre or left-field
http://www2.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/sports/story.html?id=bdf90087-e183-4585-8684-223a0d1036d7 (http://www2.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/sports/story.html?id=bdf90087-e183-4585-8684-223a0d1036d7)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on September 25, 2011, 01:56:16 pm
Center field?

That's interesting and completely unexpected.

I would be shocked if that comes to fruition.  The Great One is probably being a little too optimistic with that comment.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 25, 2011, 02:15:57 pm
Interview with Wayne Gretzky

" I think Trevor's going to play next year in Boise in single A ball; they're going to try him in centre or left-field," said Gretzky, who was in town for a Kinsmen Club Legends dinner Friday and took in the Oilers exhibition game against the Flames Saturday night at Rexall Place.
"He's got a long road ahead of him, but he's got the tools. He's six-footfive, he's fast, a good hitter, he's got some power. One thing about baseball: they don't rush you. They want you getting 500 or 600 at bats, no matter where you are."

That is the first report I have seen that he is fast.  But I have seen very little scouting reports at all, so who knows?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 25, 2011, 03:29:15 pm
Interview with Wayne Gretzky

" I think Trevor's going to play next year in Boise in single A ball; they're going to try him in centre or left-field," said Gretzky, who was in town for a Kinsmen Club Legends dinner Friday and took in the Oilers exhibition game against the Flames Saturday night at Rexall Place.
"He's got a long road ahead of him, but he's got the tools. He's six-footfive, he's fast, a good hitter, he's got some power. One thing about baseball: they don't rush you. They want you getting 500 or 600 at bats, no matter where you are."

That is the first report I have seen that he is fast.  But I have seen very little scouting reports at all, so who knows?

Speaking of fast.... it appears The Great One thinks his son has a chance of making it to the majors after little more than 500-600 minor league ABs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 25, 2011, 03:57:09 pm
To me, it appears that the Great One thinks getting 500-600 AB's per season are more imporitant than playing a specific position in the field for minor league hitters. I agree with him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 25, 2011, 05:51:54 pm
To me, it appears that the Great One thinks getting 500-600 AB's per season are more imporitant than playing a specific position in the field for minor league hitters. I agree with him.
I hope Wayne knows that the Boise Hawks play a 76 game schedule and he's not counting on all those at bats coming in one year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on September 25, 2011, 07:23:18 pm
Maybe he thinks the Hawks offense is going to be batting around a whole lot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 25, 2011, 07:36:40 pm
With this line up, perhaps they will.  And if finds a spot for Zambrano where he can't hurt them.

SS Hernandez

2B Amaya

1b Vogelbach

3B Baez

LF Gretzky

RF Zapata

CF Dunston

C  Rosario

P  Zambrano
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 25, 2011, 07:50:24 pm
I hope Wayne knows that the Boise Hawks play a 76 game schedule and he's not counting on all those at bats coming in one year.

Don't forget Extended Spring Training and Instructional League.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 25, 2011, 08:36:43 pm
And batting practice.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 26, 2011, 08:51:37 am
Chicago Cubs Online rates the farm system infielders and catchers

A = more than one player capable of starting in the major leagues
B = at least one player capable of starting in the major leagues
C = at least one player capable of making it to major leagues
D = in need of an upgrade
F = in serious need of an upgrade

1B  B+
2B  A
SS  A-
3B C+
C    B

It's a lengthy article the author put a lot of work into

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/09/cubsminors92611.php#more (http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/09/cubsminors92611.php#more)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 26, 2011, 11:51:53 pm
How the heck did Dan Vogelbach steal a base?! I didn't think his body type was conducive to that sort of thing

ArizonaPhil

SHEFF: It might have been a hit & run. Golden swung & missed, and then the Diamondbacks catcher (Fidel Pena) made a really bad throw to 2nd base that ended up in right-center or else Vogelbach would have been out. (Vogelbach advanced to 3rd on the overthrow).

While he is not fast, Vogelbach runs OK for a guy his size. He runs hard (that is, with a lot of hustle and effort). I would compare him to a "pulling guard" in football.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 26, 2011, 11:53:46 pm
Mesa was dominated by Archie Bradley (8 K's in 3 IP).

If you recall, Bradley was a name mentioned with the Cubs a lot this past draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on September 27, 2011, 12:48:07 am
He was the guy I was hoping for
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 27, 2011, 09:03:42 am
 
Quote
The clock will be running on Daytona's Matt Szczur. Due to a procedural error by the last regime, the 22-year old will have to be put on the 40-man roster following the season. The former Villanova wide receiver showed that he has baseball skills by hitting .314 with five home runs, 27 RBI, and 17 stolen bases in 66 games with Peoria. The right-hander struggled a little in Daytona, going .293 with 10 homer, 46 driven in, and 24 stolen bases overall. Like Jackson, Szczur batted primarily leadoff; and like Ha, Szczur came alive in the playoffs, batting .368 for the Florida State League champions. Szczur was also named the Midwest League's best defensive centerfielder. The clock will be running on Daytona's Matt Szczur. Due to a procedural error by the last regime, the 22-year old will have to be put on the 40-man roster following the season. The former Villanova wide receiver showed that he has baseball skills by hitting .314 with five home runs, 27 RBI, and 17 stolen bases in 66 games with Peoria. The right-hander struggled a little in Daytona, going .293 with 10 homer, 46 driven in, and 24 stolen bases overall. Like Jackson, Szczur batted primarily leadoff; and like Ha, Szczur came alive in the playoffs, batting .368 for the Florida State League champions. Szczur was also named the Midwest League's best defensive centerfielder.
Is this news?

What was the error?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on September 27, 2011, 09:36:12 am
The right-hander struggled a little in Daytona, going .293 with 10 homer, 46 driven in, and 24 stolen bases overall.

If only all of our prospects could struggle so mightily...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 27, 2011, 09:42:34 am
The right-hander struggled a little in Daytona, going .293 with 10 homer, 46 driven in, and 24 stolen bases overall.

If only all of our prospects could struggle so mightily...

And at Daytona, which was the point the writer was making, he hit .260, with an OBP of .283 (definitely what you would want for your leadoff hitter), and had an OPS of .694   .  That is struggling for an OFer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on September 27, 2011, 09:44:57 am
Cactus, thanks for the Chi Cubs Online article!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 27, 2011, 09:47:15 am
Cactus, thanks for the Chi Cubs Online article!
Ben, today's review is the farm system outfielders.  I wasn't going to post it since there was zero interest in yesterday's infielders and catchers, but

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/09/cubsminors92711.php#more
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on September 27, 2011, 09:54:13 am
The point was that the sentence was poorly written...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 27, 2011, 10:49:57 am
The point was that the sentence was poorly written...

No argument there, but it was not just that one sentence -- the 3rd, 4th and 5th sentences are repeated verbatim at the end of the piece.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 27, 2011, 10:50:39 am
Ben, today's review is the farm system outfielders.  I wasn't going to post it since there was zero interest in yesterday's infielders and catchers, but

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/09/cubsminors92711.php#more

Just because there were no responsive posts doesn't mean there was no interest.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on September 27, 2011, 11:01:22 am
The Szczur 40-man roster was discussed here several weeks ago.  I thought it was a "procedural error" too, at the time, but it was pointed out (Chris?) that it's because the Cubs had to re-write Szuzur's contract, with a larger bonus, when push came to shove for him to commit to baseball intead of going into the NLF draft.  So, as I understand it, it wasn't really a "procedural error" but the two-step process necessitated by Szucur's not being sure about what sport to play when he first signed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 27, 2011, 11:36:29 am
Thanks, Cactus.  There was a lot more interest in the posts than it may have seemed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 27, 2011, 02:38:38 pm
davep, I also read both posts. They were quite thorough, so I didn't have any comments to add.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 28, 2011, 07:16:12 pm
Cubs dominated yet again in Instructs today.

Mark Malave made his debut: 0-3, 2 K

Baez made another error: 1-3, K

Vogelbach: 0-3, 2 K

Candelario: 1-1

Zych was impressive as he should be: 1 IP, 2 K, 7 of 8 pitches for strikes
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 28, 2011, 08:37:56 pm
Some things you just come to expect....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 28, 2011, 10:39:05 pm
ArizonaPhil

21-year old RHRP Tony Zych (Cubs 2011 4th round draft pick out of the U. of Louisville) pitched the 6th inning. He came out firing high-velocity gas and a sharp-breaking slider, and had an easy eight-pitch 1-2-3 inning with lots of swings & misses and two strikeouts. I wouldn't be surprised if Zych ends up on the same track in 2012 as Kevin Rhoderick and Aaron Kurcz this past season, starting the year at Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 28, 2011, 10:53:22 pm
On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if Zych were out of professional baseball in six months.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 29, 2011, 10:07:40 am
Northwest League Top 20 Prospects

10. REGGIE GOLDEN OF, BOISE HAWKS (CUBS)

Age: 19. B-T: R-R. Ht.: 5-10. Wt.: 210. Drafted: HS—Wetumpka, Ala. '10 (2).
Built like a linebacker and nearly as strong, Golden shows explosive raw power. He already has homered in a game at Wrigley Field—the 2009 Under Armour All-America Game—and projects to hit many more there if he makes it to the big leagues.

"The ball comes off of his bat as hard as I've seen," the NL scout said. "He's got a long ways to go because he will swing and miss a lot, but he hit one and I don't know if they ever found it."

Golden doesn't pull off balls as much as he did in high school, though he frequently chases pitches out of the zone and will need to cut down on his strikeouts. He's not a burner and doesn't get out of the box well, but he's a solid runner underway. He has improved defensively since signing and should be an average defender with a solid arm in right field.

12. BEN WELLS RHP, BOISE HAWKS (CUBS)
Age: 18. B-T: R-R. Ht.: 6-2. Wt.: 220. Drafted: HS—Bryant, Ark. '10 (7).
Wells pitches mainly off his fastball, and spent much of 2011 trying to achieve a balance between velocity and movement. Early in the season, he sat at 87-91 mph with his heavy two-seamer. As the year went on, he learned how to get the best of both worlds, peaking at 94 while maintaining above-average sink.

"He's just an absolute gamer," Boise manager Mark Johnson said. "I wish I had five starters like that. He's going to be something special. I haven't seen a sinker like his in a while, it's just a power sinker that he can throw over and over and over."

Wells flashes an average changeup at times, though his curveball is below average. While he has a fleshy build with some baby fat remaining on his frame, he has a loose arm and throws strikes.

14. PIN-CHIEH CHEN OF, BOISE HAWKS (CUBS)
Age: 20. B-T: L-R. Ht.: 6-1. Wt.: 170. Signed: Taiwan '09.
A second baseman in his 2010 pro debut, Chen moved to center field this year and put his well above-average speed and solid arm strength to better use. He's still learning how to read balls off the bat and had difficulty going back to make plays early in the season, but made progress as he gained experience.

Chen has excellent bat control and uses his hands well in his swing to consistently square balls up. He has almost no power and doesn't project to develop any because he has a thin frame with narrow shoulders. He understands his limitations and uses a slap-and-dash approach to get on base.

"Not knowing the numbers, I'd have guessed he hit .340 this year," Johnson said. "He always smokes the ball and has a real knack for squaring it up. He just needs to lift and get stronger. He's like a pitchfork, but he has some unbelievable, God-given hands."

17. ZEKE DeVOSS 2B, BOISE HAWKS (CUBS)
Age: 21. B-T: B-R. Ht.: 5-10. Wt.: 171. Drafted: Miami '11 (3).
One of several above-slot signings for the Cubs in the 2011 draft, DeVoss parlayed his extra leverage as a draft-eligible sophomore into a $500,000 bonus in the third round. He quickly won over Cubs owner Tom Ricketts, who attended a game in Boise and saw him draw three walks and obliterate the catcher in a play at the plate.

A switch-hitter with patience and above-average speed, DeVoss profiles as a prototypical leadoff hitter. He has enough strength in his tightly wound frame to drive some balls into the gaps. He split time between second base and the outfield in college and in his pro debut, and he has the hands and enough arm strength to stay in the infield.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 29, 2011, 10:08:37 am
Midwest League Top 20 Prospects

9. MATT SZCZUR OF, PEORIA CHIEFS (CUBS)
Age: 22. B-T: R-R. Ht.: 6-1. Wt.: 195. Drafted: Villanova, '10 (5).
Szczur earned MVP honors in the 2009 NCAA football championship subdivision title game and projected as a mid-round pick in the 2011 NFL draft as a wide receiver. After he hit .347 in his pro debut last summer, the Cubs persuaded him to play baseball full-time with a $1.5 million deal in January.

Szczur's best tool is his well-above-average speed, which helps him hit for average, create havoc on the bases and run down everything in center field. He has strong hands and wrists and a knack for barreling the ball, so he could have average power as he learns to get more extension through the ball. His arm has improved considerably since he signed and now rates as solid to plus.

"I love that guy," Menchaca said. "I'll take him any day. He's a tremendous athlete and I also like the way he went about his business. He's just a grinder who doesn't give at-bats away and runs everything out."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 29, 2011, 10:41:21 am
NWL and MWL chat questions . . .

Mike (Chicago): Are there any other cubs pitchers that I could get excited about besides Wells, such as a Yao-Lin Wang?

Conor Glassey: Lots of questions about Yao-Lin Wang and, yes, he was close to making the list. But Wang got mixed reviews and wound up in my 21-30 range. At his best, he has a mid-90s fastball—though it's too straight—and pretty good curveball, which helped him rack up big strikeout numbers. He's a good competitor, but some scouts saw him more in the 87-91 mph range and his changeup is below average. Fringy back-of-the-rotation guy, but probably winds up in the bullpen. The Boise guy that was closer to making the list was RHP Jose Rosario, who sat 92-94 and topped out at 97. He's a small guy but has a loose arm and is working to develop his curveball.

Jack (Toronto): Did any Cubs just miss the list? I know Hoilman was old for the league, but he put up some sick power numbers.

Conor Glassey: Already mentioned some other Hawks. Hoilman didn't just miss the list, but he did miss a lot of breaking balls. The power numbers are impressive, but he also came within 3 strikeouts of breaking the NWL all-time record (held by current Cubs outfield coordinator Lee Tinsley).

Bob (Mundelein, IL): Where would you rank Hayden Simpson's season among the most disappointing among all minor league prospects? I realize it's too early to give up on him but his stuff was nowhere close to what you would expect from a 1st rounder. Was it a result of being shut down after signing with the Cubs?

Jim Callis: Yes, definitely one of the biggest disappointments. The Cubs attribute it to the nasty case of mono he came down with after he was a surprise first-round pick in 2010. He lost a lot of weight and had trouble regaining his strength. His fastball sat at 82-86 mph and his curveball didn't have much power to it.

John (Oak Park): Frank Del Valle was reportedly clocked at 98 mph at one point this season. Can you tell us anything else about him?

Jim Callis: I don't know where that number came from, but I think that was a mistake on a radar gun if someone saw a 98. I've asked the Cubs and I've asked several MWL observers, but del Valle usually pitches from 88-91. He's more of a command guy who relies on mixing and locating his pitches rather than blowing the ball by hitters.

John (Oak Park): It seems like a lean year for the Peoria Chiefs, other than Matt Szczur did any other prospects get consideration?

Jim Callis: Nope. Dallas Beeler might have, because he showed a heavy 90-93 mph sinker and promising secondary pitches, but he didn't pitch enough to qualify.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 29, 2011, 10:46:40 am
Arizona League chat questions . . .

Jon (Peoria): How did Hayden Simpson look in Arizona? He wasn't very good in the MWL and he seemingly wasn't any better after being demoted. Does he have any health issues or is he still recovering from having mono last year?

Bill Mitchell: Simpson's velocity was generally in the 80-84 range in the AZL. I didn't hear of any injury affecting him. Whether he's still suffering from the effects of last year's case of mono remains to be seen. He was not considered for the AZL prospect list.

Jack (Toronto): I know Baez and Vogelbach didn't get enough experience to qualify, but what did you hear/think about them?

Bill Mitchell: Baez gave me a lasting memory during the last game of the season when he hit a very hard soaring liner off the top of the batters eye at the Cubs complex. It was truly one of the most impressive hits that I witnessed at any level all season. The kid has incredibly strong hands and excellent bat speed. One scout told me that he was going to grade him as a possible future MLB all-star. He also showed the ability to make dazzling plays at shortstop while, like most young players, make too many errors on easy plays. Vogelbach came as advertised —- a big, big kid with impressive raw power, plus a real enthusiasm for the game. There will always be questions about his size and whether the weight will affect him down the road.

Mike (Chicago): Any cub pitchers that were close to making the list or at least is there any pitcher on the AZL cubs that I could get excited about?

Bill Mitchell: The Cub pitcher who just missed the list is Canadian southpaw Brian Smith, a 40th round pick in 2010 who looked good until he wore down late in the season. He's got a live fastball that's 90-93 and a good change-up that he uses to set up the fastball. He's still relatively inexperienced so he won't rush through the system.

Dan (Chicago): I was pretty suprised Cubs C Neftali Rosario wasn't in the top 20. How close was he and what kept him off?

Bill Mitchell: I liked Rosario and considered him for the list. He's got good power potential at the plate but needs to develop more consistency. Right now he's got a "swing at everything" approach. Like any young catcher, he needs to improve his ability to call a game but that'll come from experience.

Navin (Pasadena, CA): Jim Callis mentioned 3 Cubs just missed this top 20 list. Who are they and how close were they to making it? Thank you!

Bill Mitchell: I already mentioned left-handed pitcher Brian Smith. The other two were outfielder Oliver Zapata (great bat speed, gap to gap hitter, very fast runner) and outfielder Trey Martin. The latter is especially intriguing as an over-slot 13th round pick with plenty of natural abilities and a good feel for the game; he's still very raw, especially defensively. The classic high risk, high reward player.

Jack (Toronto): Do either of the Cubs MI prospects Amaya or Hernandez project for good power? Or are they more contact oriented hitters?

Bill Mitchell: Both are more contact type hitters. Hernandez has gotten stronger and could project as a 15 homerun type of hitter. Amaya is more of a line drive hitter with gap power.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 29, 2011, 12:57:39 pm
Arizona League chat questions . . .

Jon (Peoria): How did Hayden Simpson look in Arizona? He wasn't very good in the MWL and he seemingly wasn't any better after being demoted. Does he have any health issues or is he still recovering from having mono last year?

Bill Mitchell: Simpson's velocity was generally in the 80-84 range in the AZL. I didn't hear of any injury affecting him. Whether he's still suffering from the effects of last year's case of mono remains to be seen. He was not considered for the AZL prospect list.

Pretty discouraging about Simpson.

Nice reports on Baez and Vogelbach, but unless Simpson starts out next season extremely strong, he would look to be shaping up as a major bust.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 29, 2011, 07:10:37 pm
ArizonaPhil

Micah Gibbs ripped a solo home run and an RBI single, Danny Lockhart had three hits including an RBI double, and six pitchers combined to throw a five-hit shutout, as the Cubs whitewashed the Athletics 6-0 in AZ Instructional League action this afternoon at Fitch Park Field #3 in Mesa. 



20-year old RHP Ian Dickson (Cubs 2011 35th round draft pick out of Lafayette College) made his pro debut today, getting the start and throwing one inning. Dickson pitched-around a first-pitch lead-off double, retiring the next three A’s hitters on a strikeout (swinging) and two 6-3 GO. Dickson missed the 2011 college baseball season after suffering a torn ACL in 2010, but Cubs scouts apparently had seen enough of him in previous years to offer him a contract at the 8/15 deadline once he proved he was 100%.


Besides the Gibbs HR and Lockhart’s three hits, today’s game featured two excellent defensive plays by Cubs players.


Reggie Golden showed-off his plus arm, making an outstanding pinpoint throw from CF to nail an A’s runner trying to score from 2nd base on a line-drive single to CF with two outs in the top of the 2nd inning, and 2B Rubi Silva made a terrific turn on a 6-4-3 DP in the 5th.


Although he played mostly OF this past season at Peoria and Daytona, Silva looks very comfortable at 2B, making four other nice plays on grounders to retire A’s hitters today (each play harder than the previous one), and showing off his plus-arm on two of them. Scouts in attendance were impressed (and apparently surprised) with Silva’s play-making skills at 2B.


While Cubs 2011 3rd round draft pick 2B-LF Zeke DeVoss (U. of Miami) is probably better-suited to play LF, it would appear that Silva does have the skills required to play 2B. So don’t be surprised if the Daytona Cubs 2012 Opening Day lineup features Rubi Silva at 2B.


Silva played for the Cuban Junior National Team and then later for Havana in Serie Nacional (the Cuban major league) prior to defecting, and received a reported $1M bonus when he signed with the Cubs last December.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 30, 2011, 12:14:50 am
Brian Schlitter and Justin Berg have been designated for assignment.

Carlos Zambrano is off the disqualified list and back on the 40-man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 30, 2011, 01:53:09 pm
When do we need to start posting our top prospects list?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on September 30, 2011, 02:47:27 pm
They're due Monday, jacey.

And they take points off every day you're late!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 30, 2011, 07:06:43 pm
Instructs action via AzPhil; Cubs shut down by Archie Bradley once again.


Quote
Cubs top pitching prospect RHP Trey McNutt got the start for the Cubs, as he prepares for the start of the Arizona Fall League (AFL) next Tuesday where he will be a rotation starter for the Mesa Solar Sox.....


McNutt threw two innings, and he really struggled to get through a 26-pitch 1st inning, allowing two runs on two hits and a walk. But he retired the last five men he faced, pumping 12 consecutive strikes in the process, and he induced mostly ground balls (five ground outs and a ground ball RBI single) throughout the two innings.....

The defensive gem of the day was turned-in by Cubs 2011 #1 draft pick SS Javier Baez, who made a run-saving diving stop behind 2nd base with two outs and runners at 1st and 2nd in the bottom of the 6th, got back up on his feet, and gunned-down (easily) the D’backs runner trying to sneak home, with a laser throw to catcher Yaniel Cabezas.

Baez also scored the only Cub run of the day, lining a double into left-center to lead-off the top of the 6th, and eventually scoring on a Dan Vogelbach one-out 6-3 GO.


Dunston, Candelario, Baez, Vogelbach a combined 1-15.

Scott: 2-3-0-0-1-2

Jensen: 1-0-0-0-1-1

Zych: 1-0-1-0-1-2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 30, 2011, 07:42:19 pm
Cubs top pitching prospect RHP Trey McNutt . . .

Pitching isn't exactly the strength of our farm system right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 30, 2011, 07:50:01 pm
Pitching has always been a dreadful aspect of the Cubs organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 30, 2011, 08:54:29 pm
I will try and have a top 10 up by monday and then follow with 11-20 and then finish with the next 10 in the days ahead. Early observations: pitching is our weakness as you all know especially with top end starters. maybe in a few years maples will change that. Lots of depth and a bunch of young prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 30, 2011, 09:00:39 pm
Pitching has always been a dreadful aspect of the Cubs organization.

Yea, particularly in 2003.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 30, 2011, 10:07:18 pm
jacey, don't bother going any deeper than a top 5.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on October 01, 2011, 10:27:11 am
Jeff,

When are you going to post that top 47 you put together earlier this year!

Going over the minors it is stunning how poorly the Cubs starting pitching prospects did.   Baseball America identified an almost complete unknown as the Cubs best minor league pitcher (as opposed to top prospect) this year.  And yes, I'll have to consult my notes to remember his name again.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 01, 2011, 11:20:19 am
dallen, I think that was a relief pitcher, and that you will find him discussed in this thread a week or two ago.... and you were not the only person who had never heard of him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on October 01, 2011, 12:05:00 pm
Jeff Beliveau.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 01, 2011, 12:46:00 pm
Well I tried ranking a Top 30, but honestly, I'm not sure this is going to be much good.  Trying to distinguish the many C grade prospects we have from one another is pretty tough.  I didn't include DSL prospects or recent international signings, although I probably should take a crack at adding them to the list.

1. Javier Baez, SS
2. Brett Jackson, OF
3. Matt Szczur, OF
4. Welington Castillo, C
5. Dillon Maples, RHP
6. Josh Vitters, 3B
7. Ryan Flaherty, IF
8. Dan Vogelbach, 1B
9. D.J. LeMahieu, IF
10. Gioskar Amaya, SS
11. Trey McNutt, RHP
12. Jae Hoon-Ha, OF
13. Dallas Beeler, RHP
14. Yao-Lin Wang, RHP
15. Marco Hernandez, SS
16. Steve Clevenger, C
17. Chris Rusin, LHP
18. Zeke DeVoss, 2B/OF
19. Logan Watkins, IF
20. Reggie Golden, OF
21. Jay Jackson, RHP
22. Nick Struck, RHP
23. Scott Maine, LHP
24. Jeff Beliveau, LHP
25. Jeffry Antigua, LHP
26. Jose Rosario, RHP
27. Robert Whitenack, RHP
28. Aaron Kurcz, RHP
29. Alberto Cabrera, RHP
30. Brooks Raley, LHP
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 01, 2011, 01:48:42 pm
JR, it strikes me as very inconsistent to rank Baez #1 after a handful of AIL AB's while excluding Jeimer Candelario, who had a very successful DSL season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on October 01, 2011, 07:38:00 pm
Clark/Jes Beard,

Baseball America identified left handed Eric Jokisch as the Cubs best minor league pitcher this year.  He should be familiar to some of you as he went to college at Northwestern.  he began this year in the Midwest League where he put up solid but unspectacular numbers (103/32 K/W in 118.2 IP with an alarming 13 HR allowed).  The Cubs promoted him to Tennessee for three starts.  According to Baseball America he has an unorthodox delivery that allows him to get by with an upper 80s FB.  He was drafted in round 10 last year.

JR: I notice you left Marwin Gonzalez, Matt Cerda, Junior Lake, and Ben Wells off your list.  What caused you to leave each off of your list?

I hope you're right about Matt Szczur.  I like his write ups but worry about his 0.283 OBP in the FSL.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 01, 2011, 08:09:01 pm
I hope you're right about Matt Szczur.  I like his write ups but worry about his 0.283 OBP in the FSL.

Read carefully.

JR did not say Szczur was any good or predict success for him.

He merely ranked him 3rd best of the Cub prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 01, 2011, 08:16:21 pm
Ah.... but for "might have beens....

From an article on Matt Moore with the Rays who did so well against the Rangers in the playoff opener yesterday.....

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=ArmDhOj3iMd44hsaa5UafuERvLYF?slug=jp-passan_rays_rangers_matt_moore_game_one_ALDS_093011

Every time Powell returned to Moriarty, he was the only scout there. In Moore’s last game of the season, his fastball hit 95 mph. Powell knew the Red Sox had talked with Moore, as had the Chicago Cubs. A private workout with Moore convinced Repke to push for him after the early rounds.

Powell kept in touch with Moore’s family on draft day. Before the eighth round, the Cubs called and told him they were considering drafting him. Powell told Repke this was their chance. Repke told scouting director R.J. Harrison to draft Moore.

With the 245th overall pick, the first choice of the eighth round, the Tampa Bay Rays selected Matthew Moore from Edgewood, N.M. He signed for $115,000.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 02, 2011, 12:40:06 am
Saturday Instructs action with a note from AzPhil:

Quote
Long & lanky 6’3 LHP Christopher Pieters made his pro debut in today’s game, throwing a 1-2-3 11-pitch 5th inning (4-3, F-8, F-8). Pieters is all arms & legs, and has a similar pitching style as that of Cubs Dominican LHP Willengton Cruz.


Vogelbach: 2-3, 3B, K

Pieters: 1-0-0-0-0-0

Baez: 1-3, K

Dunston: 1-3
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 02, 2011, 02:26:57 am
Knowing that Pieters has a similar pitching style as Willengton Cruz only tells me that two pitchers I've never seen (and probably never will see) have a similar pitching style. A comparison to a current or former major league pitcher would have been more helpful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 02, 2011, 07:10:58 am
Vogelbach: 2-3, 3B, K

Seeing Vogelbach leg out a triple would have been worth the price of admission.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on October 02, 2011, 09:54:17 am
Jes Beard

Tampa had the first pick in the 8th round.  The Cubs had the third.  Of course, we don't know if the Cubs would have actually drafted Moore if Tampa had passed.

The Cubs chose Ty Wright in round 7.  Marquez Smith in round 8.  Two solid minor league hitters with (alas) little upside.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 02, 2011, 11:01:46 am
The Cubs pick of Vogelbach shows that they have read Moneyball.

Moneyball advocates buying the skill sets that are undervalued by the market.  Teams were spending a lot of money to get guys with large upsides, so the Cubs concentrated with those with large backsides.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on October 02, 2011, 11:25:03 am
The Cubs pick of Vogelbach shows that they have read Moneyball.

Moneyball advocates buying the skill sets that are undervalued by the market.  Teams were spending a lot of money to get guys with large upsides, so the Cubs concentrated with those with large backsides.

that's actually hilarious.  U read it somewhere?  lol
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 02, 2011, 01:50:40 pm
Saturday Instructs action with a note from AzPhil:


Vogelbach: 2-3, 3B, K



Did all nine fielders collide and die?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on October 02, 2011, 01:59:19 pm
It seems like Vogelbach keeps doing good things on the basepaths, and we keep making fat jokes.  Is it possible that despite his girth he's actually a smart baserunner, and not quite as slow as he looks?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 02, 2011, 02:02:10 pm
Sure, but fat equals funny.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 02, 2011, 02:33:46 pm
He was actually 5 of 6 in steals in his senior year in HS....  http://www.maxpreps.com/athletes/H0C8rzJsgUCluxlsFh308w/baseball-spring-11/stats-dan-vogelbach.htm#base_running

Of course that may have been because the opposing teams were in shock to see the attempt....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 02, 2011, 02:46:23 pm
It seems like Vogelbach keeps doing good things on the basepaths, and we keep making fat jokes.  Is it possible that despite his girth he's actually a smart baserunner, and not quite as slow as he looks?

I believe that was the assessment I saw about Vogelbach at the time the Cubs drafted him.  He certainly looked quicker than one would expect in the videos that were available then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 02, 2011, 03:23:16 pm
That fat b******* Ruth will never amount to anything. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 02, 2011, 11:19:31 pm
Rick Reuschel was fat, and a good athlete.  Babe Ruth was fat, and a good athlete.

For that matter, Prince Fielder is fat, and a fairly good athlete.

I feel quite sure that Vogelbach will never be able to beat Campana in a race.  But then, Sandberg probably couldn't have, either.

If Vogelbach fails, it won't be because of his speed.

As someone mentioned above, pulling linemen can often keep up with fast running backs for short distances.  And baseball players run very few marathons.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 03, 2011, 08:46:54 am
Brad Snyder is now a free agent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 03, 2011, 09:27:59 am
Vogelbach's times in the 60 yd dash were quite impressive for a guy his size...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 03, 2011, 09:34:01 am
While I don't recall the times, my memory is that they were pretty impressive for a middle infielder, not just impressive for a land whale.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on October 03, 2011, 09:39:55 am
Ruth wasn't fat in his Red Sox years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 03, 2011, 10:33:28 am
I don't remember the numbers either, but they were quite fast for the 60.  But he needs several steps to get up to speed.  He will never be fast going from home to first.  But from what I understand, he isn't a Ramirez or Soto either, at least at this point in his life.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 03, 2011, 10:41:51 am
Ruth wasn't fat in his Red Sox years.

He also wasn't performing at the level which inspired awe in his Red Sox years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on October 03, 2011, 02:02:59 pm
1. Brett Jackson

2. Trey McNutt

3. Joe Hoon Ha

4. Josh Vitters

5. Rafael Dolis

6. Javier Baez

7. Ryan Flaherty

8. Dan Vogelbach

9. DJ Lamaheiu

10. Matt Szczur
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 03, 2011, 11:19:06 pm
Monday Instructs:


Candelario: 2-4, 2 2B, 2 RBI, BB, E

Vogelbach: 0-5, 2 K

DeVoss: 1-5, 2 K, 3 E

Jeffrey Baez: 3-4, 3B, 2 RBI, K

Zych: 1-2-3-0-1-3


Trey Martin joins the team, returning from a shoulder strain.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 04, 2011, 08:54:33 am
Down On The Farm pitching analysis - Iowa and Tennessee (Daytona and Peoria tomorrow)


http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/10/cubsminors10411.php#more (http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/10/cubsminors10411.php#more)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 04, 2011, 09:00:30 am
Quote from: Carrie Muskat
The Arizona Fall League gets underway on Tuesday with the Cubs prospects playing for the Mesa Solar Sox in Phoenix against the Desert Dogs. This is the AFL’s 20th season. Marcus Hatley, who pitched at Class A Peoria, high A Daytona and Double-A Tennessee this season, is slated to pitch in relief for the Mesa team. The Cubs’ Chris Carpenter is scheduled to throw Wednesday when the Solar Sox play at HoHoKam Park in Mesa, Andrew Cashner was to pitch Thursday, and Trey Mc Nutt was to start Friday. Other Cubs on the Mesa roster include third baseman/outfielder Josh Vitters, infielder Junior Lake and infielder DJ LeMahieu.
I hope to make it up there next week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 04, 2011, 10:58:08 am
ArizonaPhil

Matt Spencer looked very good yesterday. He threw strikes and showed a plus-curve.

A couple of the A's instructors remembered him from when he was in the A's organization (he was traded to the Cubs in the Jake Fox deal post-2009) and they gave him a big hug before the game when they found out he was converting to pitcher.

Kyler Burke is definitely the better pitching prospect of the two. He's 23 going on 24 (Spencer is 25 going on 26) and was a legitimate LHP prospect in HS (some scouts had him rated higher as a pitcher than as a hitter).

Burke throws 94 with a solid change-up and curve, and if he can develop some stamina he could possibly even be a rotation starter. At the very least he should be a good LHRP (like Gaub-Maine-Beliveau) as he gains more experience on the mound.

One thing to keep in mind about Burke is that he is eligible to be a Six-Year Minor League FA post-2012, so the Cubs will have to evaluate him very carefully next season and decide if they should add him to the 40-man roster him by the 11/20 deadline (even if he hasn't progressed above Daytona) or else let him walk away as a FA. My guess is he will be added to the Cubs 40-man roster post-2012.

Spencer benefits from making his transition to LHP in Instructs (Burke made his move at Extended Spring Training) so he will be able to be a pitcher from the start of Minor League Camp next year. Spencer probably projects as a LHRP, and a good comp (at this point) might be Luke Sommer (an OF converted to LHRP by the Cubs in 2008 who made it all the way to AAA before getting released this season).

The Cubs are a bit short in LHRP below Iowa, so Burke and/or Spencer could get promoted very quickly next season if they show they have mastered a given level.

I expect Burke to begin the 2012 season at Peoria (although Daytona is a possibility) and Spencer to begin the season at Extended Spring Training, with one or two in-season promotions possible for both.

Burke needs to rack up innings, so starting or piggy-backing at Peoria is the fastest way to do that, although ideally he would get to Daytona by mid-season, even if he has been moved to the bullpen by that time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on October 04, 2011, 02:09:08 pm
11. Jay Jackson

12. Steve Clevenger

13. Jeff Beliveau

14. Chris Carpenter

15. Junior Lake

16. Tony Zych

17. Jeffrery Antigua

18. Wellington Castillo

19. Alberto Cabrera

20. Dae Eun Rhee
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 04, 2011, 03:34:14 pm
Quote
Andrew Cashner was to pitch Thursday, and Trey McNutt was to start Friday.

Doesn't that wording make it seem like they're not going to pitch as expected?  I read that and kept waiting for the other shoe to drop, like, "... but they were later scratched when a rabid squirrel somehow got into their apartment and ripped out their throats."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 04, 2011, 04:32:13 pm
Josh Vitters starts the AFL season with a three-run homer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 04, 2011, 06:37:20 pm
Vitters   2-4, 2 homers, 5 RBIs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 04, 2011, 06:56:25 pm
Sure would be nice to have Vitters prove I was premature in writing him off as a serious prospect late this past season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on October 04, 2011, 07:01:35 pm
Ramirez' asking price just went down a million bucks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 04, 2011, 11:05:21 pm
And it begins....


Quote
Making his pro debut, 19-year old RHP Dillon Maples got the start for the Cubs, but was unable to complete even one inning thanks to a bout with wildness. After striking out the first man he faced with a nasty breaking ball, Maples walked the bases loaded on 13 pitches, and then allowed a bloop RBI single to RF as the Rockies took a 1-0 lead. Maples then got the ground ball he wanted, but it wasn’t hit hard enough to turn two, so another run scored.

By that point Maples had reached his pitch limit, and so he was pulled from the game with two outs and runners at 1st & 3rd. For the day, Maples threw a total of 25 pitches, but only nine strikes.


Vogelbach: 0-1, K, 3 BB

Jeffrey Baez: 1-3, 2B, RBI, BB, K

Geiger: 3-4, 2B, RBI, SB
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 04, 2011, 11:25:51 pm
Vitters threw in a steal as well.


LeMahieu: 0-2, 2 BB, HBP

Lake: 0-3, BB, K, SB

Hatley: 1-1/3 -3-1-1-0-0


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_04_msswin_pddwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 04, 2011, 11:26:57 pm
Vitters is going to be playing some corner outfield in the AFL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 05, 2011, 06:51:36 am
Lemahieu three non-hit on-bases.  Weird day. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 05, 2011, 09:08:55 am
Down On The Farm's less than enthusiastic (see the Angel Guzman comments) analysis of the pitching at Daytona and Peoria.


http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/10/cubsminors10511.php#disqus_thread (http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/10/cubsminors10511.php#disqus_thread)


Next :  Boise, AZL Cubs, and the Dominican Summer League
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 05, 2011, 09:50:58 am
Heh, another mention of Del Valle's 100mph heater...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 05, 2011, 10:37:16 am
Heh, another mention of Del Valle's 100mph heater...

He doesn't throw nearly that hard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 05, 2011, 11:02:59 am
The reports from "Down on the farm" are well done and interesting, but they are just a recap of the stats from the last season, with a few comments gathered from the web.

As mentioned above, the near 100 mph pitching by Del Valle was clearly a bad gun reading, and all reports indicate that he tops out at 92-93 and works at about 89 - 91.  Also, the reference to Rhee as a fireballer doesn't match with the eye witness reports we have received in the past.

Finally, referring to Guzman as having been "demoted" to Boise is a little misleading.  After he reached his preset maximum of innings for the year, the Cubs shut him down, and opened a slot on the roster by moving him down to the Boise roster for technical purposes.  He did not actually pitch in Boise, and as far as I know, he never reported there.

That said, the articles are very useful to put the season in perspective.  Cubs pitching in AAA and AA really was poor, as far as near term prospects are concerned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 05, 2011, 12:20:56 pm
BA put Brett Jackson #4 in the Southern League top 20. He is the only Cub listed.


Chris Archer came in at #11.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on October 05, 2011, 01:02:05 pm
This is the hardest part of my Top 30 prospects because there are so many at the lower end of the spectrum that I feel are good possibilities of contributing at the big league level at some point.

21. Dillon Maples

22. Scott Maine

23. Chris Rusin

24. Reggie Golden

25. Zeke DeVoss

26. Shawon Dunston Jr

27. Taiwan Easterling

28. Ben Wells

29. Nick Struck

30. Candelario

Best of the rest (in no particular order):
Rhoderick
Beeler
Jokisch
Silva
Cerda
Whitenack
Simpson
Rosario
Watkins
Je Baez
Amaya
Abreu
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 05, 2011, 04:51:57 pm
BA chat on the Southern League top 20:

Commish (NY): Really? No Josh Vitters? Seems like he's now being uundervalued due to the failure to live up to the hype. I think this is one guy who still could prove to be better than a good portion of the players ahead of him on this list. I certainly would slot him ahead of Archer..that seems about right.

Ben Badler: Vitters improved as a hitter this year, but there just wasn't much support for him. He's a below-average defender at third base, to the point where I would be surprised if he stayed at the position and didn't end up as a corner outfielder. He has good bat speed, a short stroke and makes a lot of contact, but he's still learning a major league approach to wait for his pitch to hit, he'll never be a big OBP guy, and it's not like he's a guy with 70 raw power to carry him. There are people who think he could improve enough to become a solid everyday, but I think the most likely outcome is something short of that.

Ben (Leland Grove): How much did Trey McNutt regress this year?

Ben Badler: McNutt was probably the most challenging player in the league to evaluate. The whole season, he wasn't 100 percent, spent time on the DL and battled through blisters. I think that took away from his stuff and his command and led to a fairly nondescript year. When I saw him in April, the fastball was plus, 90-95 with the two-seamer and the four-seamer, but the rest of the arsenal was just OK, with a power curveball and a slider that were tough to distinguish and a changeup he went to occasionally. Nobody I talked to who saw McNutt this year saw frontline stuff and there was a general feeling of being underwhelmed, but if he's healthy in 2012 I wouldn't be stunned if he had a bounceback year.

Navin (Pasadena, CA): Who do you prefer between Ryan Flaherty and DJ LeMahieu? Can either be a big league starting second baseman?

Ben Badler: Most people I talk to say LeMahieu; shorter swing, makes more contact, hits for a higher average in the minors, but I still like Flaherty more. He's got more power both to the pull side and to the middle of the field, plus he'll take his walks and get on base. With LeMahieu, I think big league pitchers have and will take advantage of the fact that he's got 20, maybe 30 power at best and he won't give you much offensive value. Flaherty's older but I can see his bat playing at the major league level. The problem is if you put either of them at second base full-time, it isn't going to be pretty, but I can see Flaherty carving out a career as an offensive-oriented utility guy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 05, 2011, 04:58:59 pm
Finally, referring to Guzman as having been "demoted" to Boise is a little misleading.  After he reached his preset maximum of innings for the year, the Cubs shut him down, and opened a slot on the roster by moving him down to the Boise roster for technical purposes.  He did not actually pitch in Boise, and as far as I know, he never reported there.

From the guy who wrote the report on Angel Guzman:

Quote
If you can find out why Guzman was placed at Boise, it would be helpful. I can understand that Daytona would want an extra roster spot for the playoffs, but Boise was in the running for the playoffs too. If they just needed a spot to put Guzman, they could have put him in Peoria, Arizona or the DL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 05, 2011, 05:26:41 pm
AFL action:  The Cubs Chris Carpenter just hit 100 mph against Michael Choice


Junior Lake - single, double, and solo homer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 05, 2011, 05:27:38 pm
Vitters: 0-4, 2 K

Lake: 3-4, 2B, HR, RBI, SB, E

LeMahieu: 1-4, RBI, 2 K

Carpenter: 2-0-0-0-0-1


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_05_pddwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 05, 2011, 05:29:53 pm
Chris, I would not have made that post had I known you were going to make your report now instead of this evening.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 05, 2011, 10:08:22 pm
I didn't see your post until just now, Cactus. It doesn't hurt to have multiple posts on the topic though.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 06, 2011, 09:01:59 am
Down On The Farm's pitching analysis of the low minors

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/10/cubsminors10611.php#disqus_thread
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 06, 2011, 10:18:41 am
The World Cup games are underway.  Here are some box scores:

Oct 2 vs Japan             rained out

Oct 3 vs Puerto Rico      http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/13.htm (http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/13.htm)
 
Oct 4 vs Chinese Taipei  http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/22.htm (http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/22.htm)

Oct 5  Oct 2 makeup      http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/06.htm (http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/06.htm)


By my quick count, RF B Jackson is 4-12, 3 walks, 4 Ks, 1 SB, no extra base hits.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 06, 2011, 11:06:14 am
ArizonaPhil

Dunston had his best game offensively in his first pro game and he has struggled since. He is in a slump right now, and has been really showing his frustration both verbally and with his actions.

He is a more-patient hitter than his dad, but he runs the bases very aggressively.

His defense in CF is VERY good. He has plus-range and takes good routes, and he has a strong arm.

He appears to have been well-coached in the fundamentals of baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 06, 2011, 12:22:27 pm
ArizonaPhil

Taiwan Easterling is an aggressive player in all facets of his game.

An aggressive fielder who lays his body out to make a play, an aggressive base-runner who is always looking to take an extra base, and an aggressive hitter who doesn't have a lot of patience.

One thing Easterling probably has to do to ultimately be successful is hit HR and lots od doubles and triples. Because he is NOT a lead-off hitter.

I suspect Easterling will begin the 2012 season at Daytona, playing LF (and some CF when Szczur is the DH) and hitting maybe 6th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 06, 2011, 04:11:56 pm
I think it would be somewhat logical to expect that kind of play from Easterling, because he was a defender at Florida State.

Does that make any sort of sense to those baseball coaches out there?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 06, 2011, 06:00:25 pm
Vitters: 2-4, SF, 2 RBI

Lake: 0-5, K, E

LeMahieu: 1-5, SB


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_06_surwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on October 06, 2011, 07:54:56 pm
SZ, not a big deal, but i think Easterling played wide receiver in football. So, with Szcur, Smrdj, and Easterling, the Cubs have 3 better WRs than the Bears.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 06, 2011, 08:22:40 pm
On the other hand, Jerry Angelo is a better GM than Jim Hendry was.

Let us pause for a moment to consider the magnitude of that statement.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 06, 2011, 08:53:47 pm
Highly debatable...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 06, 2011, 09:05:09 pm
Nope.

Angelo is a generally decent GM with an inexplicable blind spot about the offensive line.

Hendry was a living, breathing catastrophe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 06, 2011, 09:48:46 pm
Defensive line and receiving core never get any better either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 06, 2011, 09:55:06 pm
Jim Hendry 749-748 as GM of the Cubs
Jerry Angelo 76-68 (.517)

Huge difference and Angelo is sooooo much better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 06, 2011, 10:00:19 pm
Bears have been quite fortunate with some of their records.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 06, 2011, 10:46:57 pm
SZ, not a big deal, but i think Easterling played wide receiver in football. So, with Szcur, Smrdj, and Easterling, the Cubs have 3 better WRs than the Bears.

Yeah, you're right.

For some reason, I thought he played defensive back / kick returner at Florida State.

My bad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 06, 2011, 11:11:52 pm
If Angelo ran the Cubs, he would sign Pujols and surround him with the Iowa Cubs (minus Brett Jackson).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 07, 2011, 03:14:58 pm
Yesterday's Instructs:

Geiger: 1-3, HR, 3 RBI

Vogelbach: 0-3, BB

Malave: 1-2, BB

Candelario: 1-2, 2B, RBI, BB

DeVoss: 0-4, K, E

Zych: 1-1-0-0-0-1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 07, 2011, 04:06:15 pm
Vogelbach and Dunston have struggled since the first game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 07, 2011, 05:29:09 pm
McNutt: 3-0-0-0-0-0

Vitters: 1-4, K

LeMahieu: 0-4, K


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_07_msswin_srrwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 07, 2011, 09:52:17 pm
Friday Instructs:


Candelario: 2-4, 3B, RBI

Vogelbach: 1-1, RBI, 3 BB

Dunston: 0-3, 2 K

Burke: 3-0-0-0-1-5

Baez hasn't played in a week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 07, 2011, 10:18:31 pm
Baez hasn't played in a week.

Aramis Ramirez and his laziness is already rubbing off on him.

That's a shame.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 07, 2011, 10:31:48 pm
ArizonaPhil

LHP (ex-OF) Kyler Burke threw three innings of no run/no hit ball with five strikeouts and Jeimer Candelario and Dan Vogelbach **** back-to-back RBI singles in the top of the 8th to tie the game at 3-3, but the Mariners pushed across a run in the bottom of the 8th to take back the lead and added three more in a tack-on 9th to defeat the Cubs 7-3 in AZ Instructional League action this afternoon at Mariners Field #2 at the Peoria Baseball Complex in Peoria, AZ.

The game was extended an extra half-inning so that Cubs LHRP Andrew McKirahan could get his pre-scheduled one inning of work, but he probably wishes the team had just gone home after the top of the 9th with a 4-3 loss because he surrendered two long home runs (one to Phillips Castillo and the other to Jaban Blash) in the bottom of the 9th,

In addition to his game-tying RBI single, Dan Vogelbach walked three more times today, giving him seven walks in his last 12 Plate Appearances (over three games). So far at Instructs, Vogelbach is hitting just .241, but with a 406 OBP.

And with a triple and a single today, 17-year old switch-hitting 3B Jeimer Candelario is now hitting a robust 333/379/518.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 08, 2011, 12:16:10 am
World Cup

Thursday
USA 3, Greece 0
Jackson - DNP

Friday
Netherlands 7, USA 5
Jackson 1-5, R, K
(grounder back to the pitcher, fly to center, reached on a fielders choice, single up the middle, struck out swinging)


http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/38.htm (http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/38.htm)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 08, 2011, 12:25:36 pm
ArizonaPhil

Conventional wisdom when Kyler Burke moved to pitcher at the end of Minor L:eague Camp last March was that he would eventually be a lefty reliever, and while that still might be the case, I am beginning to believe that he might project as a lefty starter.

He has an assortment of pitches (mid-90's fastball, plus-curve, and a change-up, and I think he is throwing a harder breaking ball now, too), and he seems to have the stamina to throw multiple innngs without losing anything off his fastball or breaking ball.

Although he is eligible for selection in the December 2011 Rule 5 Draft, I doubt that he will get selected simply because he hasn't pitched above Boise. But this time next year is when the Cubs are going to have to decide whether to add him to the 40 or allow him to leave as a Six-Year Minor League FA.

The only way the Cubs can for sure keep him from walking away and signing with another organization post-2012 is by adding him to the 40-man roster by the 4th day following the conclusion of the 2012 World Series.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 08, 2011, 07:25:00 pm
Brief writeup of Trey McNutt's three perfect innings on Friday

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111007&content_id=25543188&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc&tcid=tw_article_25543188
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 09, 2011, 12:05:46 am
Vitters: 3-5, RBI, 2 K

Lemahieu: 2-5, RBI, SB, K

Lake: 1-3, BB, K, SB

Cashner: 1-0-0-0-0-1 , 9 strikes, 4 balls

Carpenter: 1-1-1-0-1-2


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_08_srrwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 09, 2011, 06:49:27 pm
Canada 6, USA 1

Jackson (DH) 2-4, 2B, K
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 10, 2011, 11:03:55 am
Two spectacularly good posts in recent days:

shasson: "...Easterling played WR in football.  So, with Szcur, Smrdj and Easterling, the Cubs have 3 better WRs than the Bears."
 
JeffH: "...Jerry Angelo is a better GM than Jim Hendry was.  Let us pause for a moment to consider the magnitude of that statement."

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 10, 2011, 12:40:52 pm
Jim Hendry for Bears GM?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 10, 2011, 02:08:42 pm
Put Zambrano on the OL...could he be worse than Omiyale?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 10, 2011, 05:52:28 pm
USA 5, Panama 0

Jackson RF  3-5   2b, homer, 2 RBIs, CS (pick off)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 10, 2011, 06:01:24 pm
Today's game was a makeup for Saturday's rainout and ends round one.  A loss would have meant a tie with Puerto Rico (3-4 records).    Puerto Rico would have won the head-to-head tiebreaker.

The USA advances to the second round and plays Cuba Tuesday. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 10, 2011, 06:05:59 pm
Jeff Beliveau's stats for the first round

2 appearances, 3 innings, no runs, 2 hits, one walk, 6 Ks
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 10, 2011, 06:32:11 pm
Apparently Jackson was saving his power for when it was needed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 10, 2011, 06:38:08 pm
Quote from: Carrie Muskat
Baseball American ranked Cubs prospect Brett Jackson as the eighth-best prospect in the Pacific Coast League. According to BA: “Jackson is a quality athlete who does a little bit of everything. He has a quick bat, solid power and a knack for driving the ball in the gaps. He’s patient enough to draw walks, though he tends to expand his strike zone against left-handers, and some PCL observers considered his swing too mechanical.”

The report says: “Jackson has plus speed and shows aptitude on the bases. He also gets good jumps and tracks balls well in the outfield with enough range to play center. He has average arm strength and makes accurate throws.”

BA's PCL top 20

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/league-top-20-prospects/2011/2612455.html (http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/league-top-20-prospects/2011/2612455.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 10, 2011, 06:39:36 pm
Team USA stats for the first round

http://web.usabaseball.com/news/stats.jsp?eid=24731778
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 10, 2011, 06:51:35 pm
Jackson is doing pretty well.  Just how good is the international competition?

As good as he is doing.... there are still three hitters on the team doing better, which is sort of why I was wondering about the quality of the competition.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 10, 2011, 11:23:40 pm
Vitters: 1-3, 2B, BB

LeMahieu: 2-4, 2B, CS

Lake: 0-3, 3 K, HBP


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_10_msswin_scowin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 11, 2011, 04:26:55 pm
Monday Instructs action:


Vogelbach: 1-4, 2B

Candelario: 0-3, BB

DeVoss: 0-4, 2 K

Dunston: 0-3

Pieters: 1-2-3-3-3-0  (33 pitches, 11 strikes)

Scott: 1-2/3 -0-0-0-0-1


Javier Baez has some sort of arm issue according to Phil.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 11, 2011, 04:53:14 pm
"some sort of arm issue" = amputation
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 11, 2011, 05:08:32 pm
Vitters: 1-4, 2B, RBI

LeMahieu: 0-4, K
 
Lake: 2-4, SB, K

Cashner: 1-1-0-0-0-0 , SV


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_11_scowin_msswin_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Boris From Downunder on October 11, 2011, 07:31:18 pm
Nice job by Ryan Searle for Team Australia today..........

http://www.ablbuzz.com.au/?p=1299

Box

http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/60.htm
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 12, 2011, 12:05:31 am
Cuba 8, USA 7

Jackson (DH)  1-5, 2K, GIDP

http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/57.htm
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 12, 2011, 03:18:58 pm
ArizonaPhil

Hey Phil,

Any thoughts on who might be the most exciting player at instructs this year?

================================

Certainly it's Dan Vogelbach.

When he comes up to the plate everybody stops talking and watches him hit. You never know when he's going to drop a tape-measure bomb.

The more I see of Vogelbach, the more I think of John Kruk, although Vogelbach has more pure power than Kruk did in his playing days.

Vogelbach seems a really good-natured kid, nothing seems to bother him. I guess he knows that he can silence any teasing he might get by just dropping the head of his bat on a pitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 12, 2011, 03:19:59 pm
Just wondering, what are your thoughts on Rosscup and Weismann? Any chance they could make it to Chicago, or are they just organizational guys?

==================================

Zac Rosscup probably has a better chance of making it to Chicago than Scott Weismann.

When healthy, Rosscup is a control guy with three solid pitches (a 90 MPH sinker, a curve, and a change-up) who throws strikes and keeps the ball down (he had not surrendered a HR in 80+ IP in pro ball prior to this season). I would compare him to Chris Rusin.

Scott Weismann was a rotation starter at Clemson until mid-season 2011 (he and Cubs LHP Casey Harman were rotation starters on the Clemson Tigers CWS team in 2010) when he was moved to closer, and he really took to the job. He throws a low 90's sinker, a slider, and a cutter, and while he might be used as a closer or set-up guy at Peoria and Daytona, he probably projects as a middle-reliever at the upper levels.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 12, 2011, 03:21:54 pm
What does Spencer hit on radar gun? Listened to Smokies broadcast one night when he did mopup/blowout duty and announcer said stadium gun showed 99. Likely inaccurate, but he threw in low 90's as 18 year old at high school near here. Can he help as pitcher?

====================================

I don't have velo readings on Spencer, but he definitely throws hard (sort of like Wild Thing in Major League). The problem is he has a lot of difficulty controling his fastball.

His curve ball is actually a much better pitch, because at least he can throw it for strikes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 12, 2011, 06:04:41 pm
Lake: 2-4, 2 SB, E

LeMahieu: 1-4

Carpenter: 1-2-1-1-0-1


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_12_perwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 12, 2011, 06:46:24 pm
Boy, Junior Lake could really be something if he could just put it all together finally.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 12, 2011, 06:48:40 pm
Unfortunately, he's being "developed" by the Cubs organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 12, 2011, 06:51:50 pm
Unfortunately, he's being "developed" by the Cubs organization.

Yeah, I know it's an uphill battle, but it's fun to dream.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 12, 2011, 08:06:29 pm
USA vs Venezuela

postponed, rain.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 13, 2011, 09:09:16 am
Quote from: Bleacher Nation
MiLB.com picked the Cubs’ minor league All-Stars (one at each position), and, while there are some obvious ones (Brett Jackson in the OF, Bryan LaHair at 1B, Eric Jokisch at LHP), there were some surprises. Rebel Ridling and Michael Burgess got nods in the outfield over Evan Crawford, Jae-Hoon Ha and Matt Szczur. The list is nice, but it’s also a dour reminder of how weak this year was on the minor league front.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110928&content_id=25324070&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110928&content_id=25324070&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 13, 2011, 10:57:10 am
The current farm weakness is likely a direct result from the Trib's decision to sell the team in 2006, and then Zell's decision to sell it again after buying the Trib.

This meant that from 2006 thru the time the Ricketts bought it, ownership had little to no incentive to invest in minor league player development, in facilities, in minor league scouts or signing bonuses.  None of those investments were likely to improve a sale price for the team, because none of them would have even begun to show any results by the time the team was sold.... so those investments simply were not going to be made.

Add to that the decision of the Ricketts family to have one of their own assume actual control of the team instead of trusting the entire operation to a true baseball guy, and you were going to have a period of several months when Tom Ricketts was essentially just watching and evaluating.

The farm has been neglected for a while.

Hopefully that is changing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 13, 2011, 11:17:44 am
The Cubs have made substantial investments in the farm in the past 18 months, both through the draft and through overseas signings.  It will take a couple of years before results are seen, under the best of circumstances.

Just in time to give the credit to Epstein, or whoever they bring in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 13, 2011, 11:20:30 am
The Cubs have made substantial investments in the farm in the past 18 months, both through the draft and through overseas signings.  It will take a couple of years before results are seen, under the best of circumstances.

Just in time to give the credit to Epstein, or whoever they bring in.

Agreed, completely.  And I suspect Epstein knows that.... and that Hendry, who knows it better than anyone, will never point that out in any public comment.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 13, 2011, 03:27:57 pm
Some stats from yesterday's Instructs:


Vogelbach: 1-2, RBI, 2 BB

Jeffrey Baez: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, 2 K

Candelario: 0-3, BB, E

Zych: 1-1-0-0-0-2 ,WP
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 13, 2011, 03:53:19 pm
Candelario definitely seems to be one to watch...0-3 and E notwithstanding...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 13, 2011, 04:06:26 pm
Jeimer Candelario was a dominant player in the DSL, with high BA, OBP and SLG and reasonably low K and E. He's still a long way from Wrigley Field at 17, but he already deserves a spot somewhere in the Cubs top 20 prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on October 13, 2011, 04:08:58 pm
makes me think of left-handed submariners.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 13, 2011, 04:54:36 pm
USA 2, Australia 1     sorry Boris

not sure why game was shortened to seven innings

Jackson 2-2, double, sac bunt
Beliveau 1.1, hit, run (earned), K
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 13, 2011, 06:08:30 pm
This much we know:
* there's been much greater focus on - and investment in - the farm (both in the draft and overseas signings) since Ricketts bought the Cubs,
* Ricketts benchmarked the Red Sox (not the Cubs),
* the Epstein/Red Sox model was to build the foundation from the ground up, outspending other teams re the farm/amateur procurement,     
* Ricketts fired Jim Hendry and replaced him with Theo Epstein.

Thus, it's perhaps not real logical to assume Hendry was the driving force behind Ricketts investing more in the farm than previously.   

Whatever that situation, Jim Hendry seems to be a good baseball man and a very hard worker.   He did his best and his efforts made the Cub franchise much of what it is today, for better or worse.   

Unfortunately for Hendry, MLB GMs are in the results business, not the best efforts business.

I'll sure hope many of us have underestimated the assets presently in the Cub system, such that the Cubs can have tremendous success as quickly as next season...and that Jim Hendry gets a bunch of the credit.   He's a good man.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 13, 2011, 06:39:16 pm
McNutt: 2-2-2-1-3-0

Vitters: 1-4, RBI, BB, K, PO

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_13_msswin_perwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 13, 2011, 06:42:15 pm
Wednesday's Instructs:

Vogelbach: 1-4, 2B, RBI, K

Candelario: 2-4, 2B, RBI

Malave (3B): 0-3, K


Phil's take:

Quote
A 17-year old switch-hitting corner infielder who was born in New York City and raised in the Dominican Republic, Candelario has had an impressive Instructs so far, hitting 298/366/459 while playing mostly 3B and occasionally 1B (as he did today).

...

Candelario is an advanced hitter, especially from the left side. He has a large frame that could eventually translate to plus-HR power as he fills out. He already has plus bat speed from the left-side, with solid gap power. The only question is if he has the glove to play 3B, or if he might have to move to another corner (1B, LF, or RF) somewhere down the line.

With Candelario playing 1B, 16-year old switch-hitting Venezuelan bonus baby Mark Malave saw his first action at 3B.

A 6’3 wide-body who received a reported $1.6M signing bonus at the start of the International Signing Period this past July (and who probably would have been a highly-sought after HS recruit as an offensive tackle had he grown up in the U. S.), Malave will likely get playing time at C-1B-3B over the next few years while the Cubs figure out if he can remain a catcher and/or if he has the bat needed to play corner infield. He has raw power and a good eye at the plate right now (although inability to make consistent contact is an issue), and even if he remains a catcher, having the versatility to play 1B & 3B will come in handy on days he is not catching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Boris From Downunder on October 14, 2011, 02:30:13 am
USA 2, Australia 1     sorry Boris

not sure why game was shortened to seven innings

Jackson 2-2, double, sac bunt
Beliveau 1.1, hit, run (earned), K

heh, no probs mate, good game. Bad day for my boys as they had to finsih off yesterdays rain affected game right after the USA game. It was tied at 1-1, we lost that one to the Netherlands 2-1 as well! Not happy that Joe Thurston knocked in the winning run!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 14, 2011, 10:42:04 am
There is no shame losing to the Netherlands, since everyone knows that the Dutch are a superior race.

Good to hear from you again, Boris.  We need to hit the rooftops again next time you are back in civilization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 14, 2011, 10:50:57 am
Superior to Neanderthals maybe.  Close call.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 14, 2011, 10:58:38 am
Perhaps a close call with Neanderthals, but they tromp Lutherans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 14, 2011, 11:02:16 am
Lutherans aren't a race.  Lutherans is a superior lifestyle.  Moran.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 14, 2011, 11:08:35 am
Lutherans LOST the race, and dropped out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 14, 2011, 11:16:24 am
It's a marathon, not a sprint. Get back on topic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 14, 2011, 02:50:57 pm
USA 3, South Korea 1     all games now seem to be seven innings

Jackson 1-1, run, RBI, IBB, SB, sac fly.  Taken out of the game in the bottom of the fifth.

http://ibaf.prod.kgroup.eu/stats/2011/panama/games/69.htm
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on October 14, 2011, 04:16:06 pm
Jackson had to catch a flight to Boston.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 14, 2011, 05:50:02 pm
Vitters: 4-5, 2B

Lake: 1-5, HR, RBI, 2 K

LeMahieu: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB, SB

Cashner: 1-2-2-2-1-1

Hatley:  1-2/3 -5-4-4-1-1, HB, WP



http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_14_surwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 14, 2011, 06:27:27 pm
Brett Jackson tweaked his foot and is not in the second game - the makeup of yesterday's rainout with Venezuela.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on October 14, 2011, 09:51:57 pm
trade him NOW...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 15, 2011, 09:03:48 am
Quote from: Link courtesy of Bleacher Nation
Nine prospects who could intrigue Theo

Brett Jackson
Trey McNutt
Zeke Devoss
Daniel Vogelbach
Dillon Maples
Matt Szczur
Ben Wells
Logan Watkins
Jeimer Candelario

http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/6790/nine-prospects-that-could-intrigue-theo (http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/6790/nine-prospects-that-could-intrigue-theo)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 15, 2011, 09:11:42 am
Where are Hayden Simpson and Tyler Colvin?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 15, 2011, 09:15:44 am
World Cup Medal games today

Bronze - USA vs Canada
Gold - Cuba vs Netherlands
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 15, 2011, 11:05:00 am
BleacherNation

"When evaluating bats, Epstein’s philosophy has often been to emphasize patient hitters that will drive up the oppositions’ pitch count, draw walks, and have some power. He often looks for athletic players with some upside on the defensive end."

Sounds like he will like Pena.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 15, 2011, 12:01:56 pm
Theo has already acquired Carlos Pena once, so, he clearly has liked him in the past, when he was younger.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 15, 2011, 02:11:42 pm
The World Cup Bronze Medal game between the USA and Canada at Rod Carew Stadium in Panama City has been rained out.

I'm guessing there will be no makeup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 15, 2011, 05:23:25 pm
Theo has already acquired Carlos Pena once, so, he clearly has liked him in the past, when he was younger.

He also granted him free agency after two months with the Red Sox... so the love affair was not a long one.  And that was when Pena was 28 and cost next to nothing (Tampa paid him only $800K the next season).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 15, 2011, 06:34:01 pm
Lake: 3-5, 2B, HR, 4 RBI, SB, K

LeMahieu: 3-5, 2 RBI, 2 SB, BB, K

Carpenter: 1-2/3 -1-0-0-0-5


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_15_msswin_surwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 16, 2011, 03:17:09 am
Saturday Instructs:


Vogelbach: 1-3, 2B, RBI

Maples: 1-0-0-0-1-1

Zych: 2/3 -4-6-6-1-2, HB
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 17, 2011, 09:56:06 am
Check out AAAA player Bryan LaHair's "2011 offseason" numbers so far in Venezuela

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=1B&sid=l135&t=p_pbp&pid=445933
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 17, 2011, 10:15:07 am
Doesn't matter.

If September callup numbers don't prove anything, Venezuela stats prove even less.  Five games.  Big deal.  The Cubs should trade him now.  His value will never be higher.  Besides, those stats still only have LaHair 8th in the league in BA, only 2nd in OPS, and an extremely disappointing 15th in OBP at a weak .435.

Trade him now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 17, 2011, 10:25:06 am
Check out AAAA player Bryan LaHair's "2011 offseason" numbers so far in Venezuela

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=1B&sid=l135&t=p_pbp&pid=445933 (http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=1B&sid=l135&t=p_pbp&pid=445933)

Based only on his numbers, over his career, I'd think LaHair might be a guy that would interest Theo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 17, 2011, 11:10:25 am
Will be interesting to see how Theo's team assesses LaHair.

On the one hand, Jamesean modern statistical  analysis puts a lot of emphasis on age relative to league.  This is a guy with a whole lot of ABs at the same minor league level.

On the other hand, LaHair could be viewed as an undervalued asset--a minimum wage player who may simply have turned a corner late in his career.

In the end, I think the way you assess Lahair's situation is mostly traditional scouting.  Look at his swing, the pitches that he was hitting and not hitting during his late-season stint, try to assess how major league pitchers will work him and where he may have holes.  Is he another Hoffpauir or a guy that could actually make an impact.  We know he can hit below the major league level, but hard to know how those numbers translate in view of his relative age. 

My guess is that Theo will view him as a major league player who is probably better than some higher paid players, but unlikely to be a solid, above-average regular.  Maybe that's good enough for now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 17, 2011, 11:17:01 am
LaHair credits a swing shortening tip given to him by Von Joshua and to the strenuous offseason conditioning program he went through prior to the start of the 2011 season for his recent success.

Together, those changes could really skew any analysis.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on October 17, 2011, 12:50:58 pm
Von Joshua is a really bright guy, and you can bet Theo will have a long chat with him about LaHair before making any decisions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on October 17, 2011, 01:45:00 pm
If there has been a mechanical adjustment to LaHair's swing, that is very exciting news, and lends some credence to the notion that 2011's uptick was more than random.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 17, 2011, 01:58:29 pm
I have reservations that the old boy network will allow LaHair his opportunity.  It would be a huge gamble, in most of their minds, to give him the chance and spend the millions that they will probably spend on Pujols, Fielder, or Pena when a better option is staring them in the face.  What if they took that money and spent it on pitching or prospects?  Wow.  But the odds of it happening are slim and none.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on October 17, 2011, 02:50:46 pm
I didn't get a chance to watch LaHair at the end of the year.  How did he do in the outfield?  The Cubs have an opening in RF and the wishful thinking part of me hopes that maybe the Cubs find a way to dump Soriano in the offseason.  If LaHair could somehow be acceptable in LF, his bat would probably be average or maybe even surprise us and be above average for the position.  Given that he could be replacing Soriano, his defense wouldn't have to really be all that good. 

I also hope Theo takes a long hard look at Barney and ships him out of town.  Nice kid, plays hard, but his numbers are awful.  There has to be a better 2B somewhere in the organization.  Keep Barney as a utility infielder if they want, but he should not be a starter. 

The other guy I hope we trade is Soto.  He is about to get a huge raise and is what he is, a slightly above average hitting catcher.  I'm guessing Soto is probably going to jump into the 6+ million dollar range this offseason in arbitration.  Trade him and go with Wellington Castillo for now.  I just really hope they don't sign Soto to a long term deal this offseason.  I think he is going to spend a lot of time on the DL in the coming years and I would try to get rid of him right now. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 17, 2011, 03:43:38 pm
Don't forget that Robinson Chirinos put up huge numbers in the Venezuelan winter league last year as well.

Jes makes a good point. You can't really glean much from those leagues.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 17, 2011, 04:31:55 pm
Starting with his 2008 ROY season, Soto's OPS+ has been 118, 80, 135, 96. For reasons unknown, he seems to hit better in even-numbered years. I'd suggest keeping him for one more season to build his market value and replacing Koyie Hill with Wellington Castillo. Then, if they both have good years, trade Soto.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 17, 2011, 05:06:15 pm
Relief pitchers also often have good years alternating with bad ones.  Another reason not to get rid of Marmol too soon for too little.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 17, 2011, 05:48:22 pm
Lake: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, SB, BB, K

LeMahieu: 0-4, BB

Vitters: DNP for 2nd straight game

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_17_srrwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 17, 2011, 09:54:52 pm
I didn't get a chance to watch LaHair at the end of the year.  How did he do in the outfield?

It doesn't matter.  September callups don't prove anything.


Jes makes a good point. You can't really glean much from those leagues.

You did catch that I was simply poking fun at you.... didn't you?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 18, 2011, 01:30:00 pm
Instructs are over and AzPhil has final stats calculated. Some of the notable numbers:


Ja Baez: 6-22, 0 BB, 9 K, 6 E's

Candelario: 11-37, 4 BB, 5 K

DeVoss: 9-39, 3 BB, 14 K

Dunston: 6-42, 1 BB, 6 K

Golden: 6-28, 2 BB, 9 K

Malave: 3-21, 3 BB, 7 K

Penalver: 6-38, 1 BB, 7 K

Rosario: 3-28, 1 BB, 14 K

Schlecht: 6-24, 9 BB, 9 K

Vogelbach: 12-46, 10 BB, 12 K


http://www.thecubreporter.com/2011/10/17/cubs-2011-arizona-instructional-league-final-stats
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on October 18, 2011, 02:56:38 pm
Candelario is awesome.

For what it's worth, looking at what Arizona Phil wrote, Baez only had one error. "DEFENSE: 1 ERROR (E-6) "
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 18, 2011, 03:28:28 pm
I'm a big fan of Candelario, but his five errors suggests that he's still a work in progress on defense. However, he hits for power and average and walks almost as often as he strikes out, and the Cubs have mostly left him at 3B. He has plenty of time to polish his defense, and Theo will make sure that he gets adequate coaching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on October 18, 2011, 03:30:34 pm
What 17 yr old doesn't have defensive problems?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 18, 2011, 03:36:28 pm
Quote
For what it's worth, looking at what Arizona Phil wrote, Baez only had one error.


That's true. Don't know where I got 6 from. Maybe the E-6.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 18, 2011, 03:41:10 pm
I'm not overly concerned about Candelario's defense. He's still 3-5 years away from the big leagues, so he has plenty of time to work on it. If he maintains his OPS but his defense doesn't improve, he could always play as a corner OF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 18, 2011, 04:07:10 pm
ArizonaPhil


Micah Gibbs was at Instructs specifically to work on improving his hitting and his throwing, and there is no question he did that. His bat speed is still a bit sluggish, but he learned to load-up with some elevation in his swing and he got really good results from both sides of the plate. He is also a more patient & relaxed hitter, and that should result in more walks.

What with Luis Flores on the Restricted List while serving out his 50-game PED suspension, Micah Gibbs could get jumped to Tennessee out of Minor League Camp, at least until Flores is ready to return to action sometime in May. Gibbs is already the best receiver in the Cubs system, the pitchers love throwing to him, and he was a "Big Brother" to a lot of the younger kids at Instructs. A great role model for the youngsters.

17-year old switch-hitting 3B-1B Jeimer Candelario is an advanced hitter for his age. He has one of the those classic sweet lefty swings that produces line-drives from line-to line. He is OK RH, too, but it's more of a punch (NOT slap) swing. He has a large frame that could mean he will develop some significant HR power (probably more from the left side) down the line as he fills out and matures. I don't know if he can remain at 3B long-term, though. He might have to move to 1B, LF, or RF at some point.

Candelario loves to talk on the field (he speaks very good English), and I don't think a pitch goes by where you don't hear him shout something to the pitcher or to the other players. Despite being only 17, he seems to fancy himself a coach on the field.

1B Dan Vogelbach has awesome power (especially for an 18-year old), but he also will take outside pitches the other way and smoke a line-drive into the left-center alley. He is a VERY patient & choosy hitter who is not afraid to hit with two strikes. As a result, he might get called-out on strikes a bit more than the average hitter. A lot of the scouts and rival managers, coaches, and players talk about his "bad body," but he just keeps smiling, brushes it off, and just does his thing. Although he is certainly not fast, he is an aggressive base-runner who will take the extra-base if the opportunity presents itself. He is a special kid. If you told me he was John Kruk's son, I would believe it.

As for the pitchers, LHP (ex-OF) Kyler Burke has made great strides since converting to pitcher at Minor League Camp last March. Of course Burke was an outstanding two-way player (OF-LHP) in HS, and was even rated higher as a pitcher than an outfielder by some scouts going into the 2006 draft, so I guess it should not come as a surprise that he is progresing as well as he is.

Burke throws a mid-90's fastball, a curve, and a change-up, and learned to throw a slider at Instructs. Despite his age (he is 23 going on 24), the sky is the limit for Kyler Burke. As I have mentioned before, Burke is eligible for selection in the December 2011 Rule 5 Draft, and while he probably won't be taken (he hasn't pitched above Boise), the Cubs do need to remember that he is eligible to be an MLB Rule 55 Minor-League Free-Agent (Six-Year Minor League FA) post-2012, and so he could walk away if the Cubs don't add him to the 40-man roster by the 4th day following the conclusion of the 2012 World Series.

22-year old Cuban defector LHP Frank Del Valle had an outstanding Instructs, and looks to be ready to make a big move in 2012. While I suspect he will begin the 2012 season as a rotation starter at Daytona, I certainly would not be surprised if he finished the year at Tennessee.

Del Valle throws a low 90's fastball with movement, a plus-breaking ball, and a change, and he shows tremendous poise on the mound. He also has a nifty pick-off move that keeps base-runners from wanting to run on him.

20-year old 6'4 RHP Jose Arias was the #1 Cubs starter in the DSL in 2011, and he showed why at Instructs. He pounds the strike zone with a 94 MPH fastball and a solid breaking ball, and racks up the punch-outs. Arias was the Starling Peralta of this year's Instructs, and could follow a similar path as Peralta in 2011. (BTW, Peralta looked OK at 2011 Instructs, too, although his control was a bit off).

After struggling at Boise, RHP Austin Reed (who has great stuff but delicate mechanics) got things straightened out and threw 8.1 IP of shutout ball at Instructs. Hopefully he will be able to carry it over to Peoria in 2012.

Among the disappointments at 2011 Instructs, after having a big first game (a two-run single and a solo HR) Shawon Dunston,Jr went into an extended slump that never ended. His big problem is that he is (at present) an EXTREME pull hitter. He needs to use the whole field, but doesn't really seem to understand that. He just tries to pull everything.

C Neftali Rosario had all kinds of trouble both offensively and defensively at Instructs. He seemed to take a giant step backwards from where he was in the AZL. Swing & miss. Swing & miss. Swing & miss. No contact. It's so bad right now that he probably needs to go back to square-one and start all over again. And while his defense was never good, it was even worse at Instructs. His receiving skills are poor, but even his throwing (which was one of his strengths) was pretty bad at Instructs.

Among the pitchers, newly-signed RHP David Henrie (2011 NDFA - Trinidad State JC) made his pro debut and got pounded. So did AZL Cubs RHPs Felix Pena and Amaury Paulino.

5'8 fireballin' RHP Tarlandus Mitchell still can't throw strikes. It looks like it might be getting close to the end of the line for "Smoke" (this was his 4th year in the organization and he hasn't got past Boise). Really nice kid, though

Recently converted LHP (ex-OF) Matt Spencer did a really good impression of "Wild Thing" (from Major League), and 17-year old LHP Christopher Pieters (from Curacao) is definitely not anywhere close to being ready for Prime Time. Pieters looked totally lost on the mound.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 18, 2011, 04:10:55 pm
ArizonaPhil

Despite what Keith Law says, the scouts I've talked to believe the Cubs have as many big league prospects in their system as any organization. That's why Ricketts was so intent on keeping Fleita and Wilken from walking away after Hendry got fired.

And to say the Cubs best prospects are all future utility infielders, 4th outfielders, and middle-relievers doesn't jibe with what I have seen & heard, either.

But I guess people are going to believe what they are going to believe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 18, 2011, 04:12:56 pm
ArizonaPhil

 I think Brett Jackson will be a 20/20/20 lead-off hitter and a plus-defender in CF (or LF).

Jae-Hon Ha should be an everyday player (probably in RF, although it could be CF if B-Jax plays LF), with 15-20 HR power as he matures (he played at AA at age 20 in 2011), consistent 30+ doubles, and Gold Glove defense with lots of OF assists. (He needs to stop trying to steal bases, though).

Welington Castillo should a front-line MLB catcher with 20+ HR power and a high CS %.

Josh Vitters will be an everyday player in the big leagues, although probably not at 3B (it now looks more-likely 1B, although it could eventually be a corner-OF).

D. J. LeMahieu should be a starting infielder (could be at 2B or 3B) in the big leagues and should be a consistent .300+ hitter with lots of doubles.

Ryan Flaherty should be a platoon corner man (1B-3B-LF-RF) with 20+ HR power.

I think Junior Lake could get regular playing time if he can start to make better contact. Whether it will be at SS or 3B is yet to be determined, but right now I think it would probably be 3B. Nobody in the minor leagues has a stronger arm than Junior Lake.

Matt Szcur should be an everyday CF or LF.

As far as the pitchers are concerned, Trey McNutt has front-end of the rotation stuff. So did Rob Whitenack before he went down with TJS. We'll have to see how he comes back in 2013.

There are a number of middle-of-the-rotation candidates from Daytona to Iowa (Del Valle, Rhee, Antigua, Searle, Raley, Rusin, Cabera, Struck, and J. Jackson).

Aaron Kurcz could be an MLB set-up an or closer, and Jeff Beliveau has the stuff to be a #1 lefty in the pen.

(I just blew my Cubs 2012 Top 15 Prospects List in one comment!)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 18, 2011, 04:15:07 pm
Quote
Despite being only 17, he seems to fancy himself a coach on the field.


That's because he's probably 24.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 18, 2011, 04:35:55 pm
Candelario was born in New York, with a New York birth certificate.  Is there any reason why you think it is faked?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 18, 2011, 04:45:55 pm
Well, he's a Cub, so the notion that they've unearthed a potentially special prospect that young is hard to fathom.

How many 17-year-olds act like coaches on the field?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 18, 2011, 04:57:58 pm
I've seen Little Leaguers act like coaches on the field and, considering the quality of coaching there, they seemed to be better qualified.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 18, 2011, 05:53:35 pm
Well, he's a Cub, so the notion that they've unearthed a potentially special prospect that young is hard to fathom.

How many 17-year-olds act like coaches on the field?

It seems there is at least one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 18, 2011, 06:36:23 pm
Lake: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB, SB

LeMahieu: 1-3, 2B, 3 RBI, 2 BB, K

Hatley: 1-6-5-5-0-0

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_18_msswin_srrwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 18, 2011, 06:43:09 pm
Instructs are over and AzPhil has final stats calculated. Some of the notable numbers:

Vogelbach: 12-46, 10 BB, 12 K


I love that .393 OBP from an 18 year old.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 18, 2011, 10:53:42 pm
I guess that Junior Lake has been somewhat of a mixed bag in Arizona, but I don't understand the point of showcasing him for the Rule 5 if they're not going to roster him.  He's young, he's got some pop, he's playing SS.  Seems like you want to keep a guy like that in the organization or at least not want to let everybody take a good look at him at a major Fall showcase. 

I'm guessing that Lake will be rostered if he continues to do reasonably well in the AFL. Or, send him to Boston for Theo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 18, 2011, 11:49:24 pm
I assume that if Lake does well in the AFL, that the Cubs will roster him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 19, 2011, 05:19:47 pm
Maybe McNutt really wants to stay with the Cubs...


Vitters: 1-3, BB

Lake: 2-5, 2B, K, E

LeMahieu: 1-4

McNutt: 1-2/3 -5-4-2-1-1

Carpenter: 1-1-1-1-0-1, HR


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_19_msswin_scowin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 19, 2011, 06:16:03 pm
McNutt's fastball was supposedly 91-94 in the first inning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 20, 2011, 12:10:52 am
Bryan LaHair hit his 6th homer in seven games for Magallanes in Venezuela tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 20, 2011, 07:08:24 am
Trade him now.

His value will never be higher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 20, 2011, 10:11:00 am
How the Cubs ended up with McNutt.... and how it related to the Cubs not filling a scouting position that opened during the transition from short-term ownership to long-term ownership.

DJ and I talked a bit about McNutt last night. Before I go over that, let's back up and take a look at what BA had to say about McNutt prior to this season.

Background: When their Alabama area scout quit early in 2009, the Cubs decided not to replace him. So while other teams saw McNutt work in the high 80s at the start of Shelton State (Ala.) CC's season and backed off, Chicago didn't catch him until the Junior College World Series in June, when he showed a 90-93 mph fastball. After he turned down an eighth-round offer from the Twins, he slid all the way to 32nd round, where the Cubs signed him for $115,000. His stuff has continued to improve, propelling him to Double-A in his first full pro season.

Scouting Report: When he's going good, McNutt has two plus-plus pitches. Though his fastball comes in on a bit of a flat plane, he blows it by hitters at 92-98 mph. He can neutralize lefthanders by pitching to their back foot with his power breaking ball, which is more of curveball than a slider. Once McNutt uses his changeup more, it should become an average third pitch. He's stingy with walks but sometimes lapses into overthrowing, costing him command.

The Future: Ticketed for a return trip to Double-A, McNutt has a profile similar to that of Andrew Cashner and Chris Archer. All three have the stuff to pitch at the front of a rotation or close games.

He was the 2nd ranked prospect in the Cubs organization behind Brett Jackson. McNutt has missed time this year a few times due to a blister and once due to a collision. As a result, he's only thrown 44 innings. They haven't been any good either. He's allowed 11 hits per 9 and his ERA is 4.5. This is after a late promotion to AA last season when he gave up over 12 hits per 9. AA has not been kind to him.

Prior to AA, McNutt struckoutbatters at a rate of 28.8% and 29.7% while walking them at a rate of 10.7% and then 6.7% in High A last season. In AA, he's struckout 14.4% of the batters and walked 8.0%. His K-BB% is .065, which is well under the Southern League average. The K-BB% average for Southern League pitchers who started at least 60% of their appearances is .09. Much like we saw with Jay Jackson when he got to AAA, McNutt's strikeout rate has gone down to the point we have to reconsider his potential. With no way of knowing how much, if at all, the blisters and collision have affected him, all we can do is hope they've had a big impact.

Last season at AA McNutt had a 1.6 WHIP though it was a very small sample. This year it's just slightly higher. There's still a lot we don't know about McNutt and that was true entering the season. Even with these 44 innings, he's get to pitch his 200th professional inning. We probably got a little too optimistic with regards to McNutt, but he's still young.
  http://www.obstructedview.net/chicago-cubs/minor-leagues/midseason-look-at-the-cubs-top-prospects-part-2.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 20, 2011, 06:45:27 pm
Pan Am Games - USA 20, Dominican Republic 2

First indications are that Brett Jackson did not play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 20, 2011, 06:57:44 pm
Vitters: 1-3, SB, BB, K

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_20_scowin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 20, 2011, 07:14:03 pm
Stolen base?  Was the opposing catcher's arm broken on the play?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 21, 2011, 10:08:58 am
USA Baseball finally posted the box score of yesterday's USA 20-2 rout of the Dominican Republic.  Brett Jackson did not play.

The game was called after the bottom of the eighth by the mercy rule.

http://www.usabaseball.com/news/box.jsp?eid=24732136 (http://www.usabaseball.com/news/box.jsp?eid=24732136)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 21, 2011, 10:44:40 am
That is a good article by Byrd, but like all such articles, it talks only in generalities.  Get the "right players" but no explanation of what it is that makes a player "right".  Speed and defense is a great sound bite, but a team of Dwayne Bacons isn't going to win a pennant.  And "timely hitting" also sounds good.  But most studies I have seen indicate that "timely hitting" is more a short time thing than it is a career long talent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 21, 2011, 10:47:06 am
Well, if "timely hitting" is involved in assembling the 2012 Cubs, Marlon Byrd will be playing on another team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 21, 2011, 10:54:30 am
LOL  The only thing I kept thinking was, Marlon, when they brought in the "right players" weren't you the one they shipped out?  What does that tell ya, fella?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 21, 2011, 01:06:44 pm
USA 11, Panama 0     seven innings (another mercy rule win)

The box score is not yet available but it looks like Brett Jackson did not play again today.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 21, 2011, 01:32:35 pm
USA 11, Panama 0     seven innings (another mercy rule win)

The box score is not yet available but it looks like Brett Jackson did not play again today.


http://www.usabaseball.com/news/box.jsp?eid=24732246 (http://www.usabaseball.com/news/box.jsp?eid=24732246)

Jackson DNP
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on October 21, 2011, 01:35:08 pm
whats up with Jackson, not playing? injury?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 21, 2011, 01:40:03 pm
Jackson suffered a supposedly minor foot injury in the World Cup games a week or so ago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 21, 2011, 07:03:09 pm
Lake: 2-4, 2B, RBI, SB, K

LeMahieu: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI, E


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_21_pddwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on October 21, 2011, 09:03:46 pm
Hope Lake doesn't go to Boston. Let them have Vitters instead.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 22, 2011, 04:44:33 pm
Jeff made a really good post earlier this week, wondering what the Hoyer/McLeod analysis might mean in terms of development.  Very hard to guess. 

I've always thought it could largely impact analysis of procurement prospects and result in a different profile of pickup.  The Hendry-Stockstill-Fleita-Wilken tradition has never valued plate discipline, so they have always given high draft grades even if players were hackers.  If you draft hackers, it's no surprise that a lot of your players end up hacking.  So the procurement analysis might change, and with it the type of guys in the system. 

But I agree it's really interesting to wonder what kind of analysis might be done, and what kind of responding program of corrective instruction might follow.  It could be fun to follow this, although of course probably little will be known to us. 

I also have to wonder about how widespread the turnover might be in the instructional staff.  Experienced baseball guys who seemed good to Fleita and Hendry, will some of their analysis, instructional ability, and instructional technique seem really poor to McLeod and Hoyer, and we'll see a widespread replacement by new guys with new values, new approaches, and very different communication and teaching skills?  In a system where Quade was the cream of the crop, we might see a ton of change, and fast.  Should be fascinating to follow. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 22, 2011, 04:49:50 pm
By the way, I heard an interesting story on a radio broadcast last month.  I think it was on an ESPN radio broadcast of one of the Cubs-Cardinals games.

I'm not sure I remember it exactly right, that I heard it exactly right, that the radio guy said it exactly right, or that what the broadcaster had heard was true. 

But IIRC, the story he'd heard was that Jody Davis (who I'd viewed as one of the Cubs better minor league guys), had gotten fired (or else got in a fuss and simply resigned himself), because he refused to play one of the top prospects in a game where it was really wet and he thought the field conditions were bad. 

Anybody else here anything about that, or other story of what happened with Jody?  I'd gotten the impression from some inputs that many people thought he might be a better managerial candidate than Sandberg. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 22, 2011, 05:55:11 pm
I hadn't heard anything like that, Craig, but it wouldn't surprise me.  I wonder if the new development team coming in will actually allow our minor league personnel to coach and make changes to the prospects.  In the past, it's been, "you screw this kid up, you're fired."  So the path was to check one's stock portfolio and be a cheerleader.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 22, 2011, 06:40:02 pm
I hadn't heard anything like that, Craig, but it wouldn't surprise me.  I wonder if the new development team coming in will actually allow our minor league personnel to coach and make changes to the prospects.  In the past, it's been, "you screw this kid up, you're fired."  So the path was to check one's stock portfolio and be a cheerleader.

That's an interesting take, and different from what I'd been thinking.  I've been thinking that the new brainiac bosses would be more bossy about what the coaches can do.  "Dude, you better get that kid taking more pitches and being more selective or you're a goner.  You know we don't want guys being such undisciplined hackers."  So I'd been thinking perhaps the old school wasn't demanding enough in terms of expectations.  But your idea that the new regime might give more instructional latitude, and that the old guys were afraid to tinker, is interesting if unexpected. 

Perhaps if management hires smart guys and persuades them of the value of the things they want taught, it will be a non-issue.  You can better trust guys who aren't going to be teaching all kinds of dopey stuff.  And if they share your view of what matters, you can trust them to teach the right things and to teach it well. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 22, 2011, 09:09:54 pm
Vitters: 1-5

Lake: 4-5, 2B. 3 RBI, SB, K

LeMahieu: 0-3, SB, 2 BB, K, E

Carpenter: 1-0-0-0-0-1

Hatley: 1-1-0-0-0-0

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_22_msswin_srrwin_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 22, 2011, 09:25:08 pm
Get ready to say goodbye to Lake.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 22, 2011, 10:26:20 pm
One thing that might save Lake is his roster status. With the Red Sox' vastly superior minor league talent (per Gammons), they probably wouldn't have room for him on their 40-man winter roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 22, 2011, 10:40:32 pm
Is Lake on our 40 man?  Most comments are that compensation will not come from the 40 man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 23, 2011, 12:13:52 am
Mexico 3, USA 2

Brett Jackson - pinch hit in the ninth and grounded out.

Jeff Beliveau -  one inning, two Ks
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 23, 2011, 12:15:42 am
He hasn't been added to the winter roster yet, but he would be available in the Rule 5 draft at the Winter Meetings unless he's added before the magic cutoff date when Winter Rosters are frozen (around December 1?).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 24, 2011, 09:03:26 am
Down On The Farm covers all the winter leagues including box scores

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/10/cubsminor102411.php#more
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 24, 2011, 06:23:23 pm
The USA led Cuba 12-2 after the top of the fourth and hung on to win 12-10.  Box score later but it looks like Brett Jackson sat again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 24, 2011, 06:46:21 pm
Lake: 0-4, 2 K

LeMahieu: 1-4, 3 K, 2 SB


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_24_surwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 25, 2011, 08:50:34 am
 
Quote
US will play for baseball gold

GUADALAJARA, Mexico - The United States beat 10-time defending champion Cuba 12-10 Monday in the baseball semifinals at the Pan American Games.

The Americans, who won their only Pan Am Games title in 1967, led 7-0 in the third inning and stretched their advantage to 12-2 before the Cubans rallied.

Cuba has won 12 of the 15 baseball titles at the Pan Am Games, including every one between 1971 and 2007. The United States has finished second to Cuba eight times.

The Americans will face Canada, a 5-3 winner over Mexico, in today's final.


http://www.usabaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111024&content_id=25780436&vkey=news_usab&gid= (http://www.usabaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111024&content_id=25780436&vkey=news_usab&gid=)


(http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/azstarnet.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/0/f8/0f8ac91a-a413-5626-9392-6f425da7ffb2/4ea650ad059f3.image.jpg)

 
(http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/azstarnet.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/b/5e/b5e6d75b-f19d-5005-baf9-afca99351d81/4ea650ad7f741.image.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 26, 2011, 12:04:01 am
Pan Am Games
Gold Medal

Canada 2
USA 1

Box score delayed
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 26, 2011, 09:20:14 am
Pan Am Games
Gold Medal

Canada 2
USA 1

Box score delayed

http://www.usabaseball.com/news/box.jsp?eid=24732484 (http://www.usabaseball.com/news/box.jsp?eid=24732484)

Jeff Beliveau  one inning, one hit
Brett Jackson still MIA


Game story
http://www.usabaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111026&content_id=25795890&vkey=news_usab&gid= (http://www.usabaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111026&content_id=25795890&vkey=news_usab&gid=)

LHP Andrew Albers who shut down the Americans offense was at the Twins AA New Britain in 2011
http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=452027 (http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=452027)

Cumulative USA stats for the World Cup and Pan Am Games
http://www.usabaseball.com/news/stats.jsp?eid=24732484 (http://www.usabaseball.com/news/stats.jsp?eid=24732484)

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on October 26, 2011, 11:19:02 am
Defeat Cuba at last but lost to Canada?  Talk about an anti-climax.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on October 26, 2011, 11:20:50 am
Ironic, Beliveau playing against the Canadians.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 26, 2011, 05:46:01 pm
Quote from: Carrie Muskat
Iowa Cubs catcher Chris Robinson had two hits and scored a run to help Canada beat Team USA, 2-1, and win the gold medal in the Pan Am Games in Mexico on Tuesday. Cubs Minor League Pitcher of the Year, Jeff Beliveau, gave up one hit in one inning of relief work. Cubs prospect Brett Jackson did not play in the gold medal game. The U.S. beat Cuba, 12-10, in the semifinals to advance.
Robinson is from London, Ontario,
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 27, 2011, 12:33:01 am
Tuesday AFL:

Lake: 0-5, 3 K

Vitters: 1-5, K

LeMahieu: 2-3, BB, SB

McNutt: 2-1/3 -6-3-3-0-2

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_25_msswin_surwin_1


Wednesday AFL:

Lemahieu: 2-4, 2B, RBI

Carpenter: 1-2-1-1-0-2

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_26_scowin_msswin_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 27, 2011, 12:35:39 am
Lemahieu is hitting .300 with 10 walks in 70 AB, a .402 OBP.  I've always thought a contact guy like that could probably walk if he wanted to, he's just never been persuaded to want to yet.  Oddly he's been attempting lots of steals, too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 27, 2011, 01:30:32 am
Perhaps he's trying to persuade Theo that he's ready for the big leagues.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on October 27, 2011, 01:59:56 am
LeMahieu with a +10% bb rate is a prospect I can start to get excited about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 27, 2011, 10:50:22 am
I don't doubt that some players just don't have the ability to draw walks, but I believe for the vast majority, it is more a matter of motivation than talent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 27, 2011, 11:10:44 am
I don't doubt that some players just don't have the ability to draw walks, but I believe for the vast majority, it is more a matter of motivation than talent.

I'm guessing you don't really mean that drawing walks should be a goal for a hitter. 

Guys like Epstein talk about "controlling the strike zone" and "grinding out at bats."  The idea, it seems to me, is to avoid making outs to the degree possible, looking for pitches that he can "drive" and not swinging at pitches that he can't (unless there are two strikes).  Walks are seen as a byproduct of that, not a goal. 

But it seems some fans approach this subject differently, seeing walks a goal, not a byproduct.  One problem with focusing on OBA as much as some people seem to is that OBA treats a walk the same as an extra base hit, and there is obviously a very big difference.  A guy who is trying to walk won't get a lot of extra base hits.  But a guy who is looking for pitches that he can drive and not swinging at other pitches will get more extra base hits and, incidentally, more walks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 27, 2011, 11:16:17 am
You hear a lot of talk about "situational hitting".  Not usually in the Cubs organization, but in some places...

But there should also be consideration for "situational walking".  If you're facing a pitcher who is wild that day or maybe just wild in general as part of his profile, trying to draw walks in and of itself would seem to be a worthwhile objective.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 27, 2011, 11:46:28 am
There's also a significant difference between the value of a walk to a speedster versus a walk to a baseclogger. A walk to Tony Campana is much more likely to lead to scoring a run than a walk to ARam. In addition, Campana's primary offensive responsibility is to get on base any way he can, while ARam gets the big bucks to drive in runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on October 27, 2011, 12:09:13 pm
There's also a significant difference between the value of a walk to a speedster versus a walk to a baseclogger. A walk to Tony Campana is much more likely to lead to scoring a run than a walk to ARam. In addition, Campana's primary offensive responsibility is to get on base any way he can, while ARam gets the big bucks to drive in runs.

I don't agree with this.  There may be specific situations where it makes sense for Campana and Ramirez to take different approaches.  But generally, the most important thing for every hitter to do is to avoid outs, period.  If that means a baseclogger takes a bunch of walks, then so be it.  Less frequent outs = more baserunners, which results in more runs and more AB against mediocre relievers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 27, 2011, 12:12:16 pm
Good points from Jeff and Cubsin.  As to Jeff's, I'd say it depends on the batter and the game situation, but certainly there are circumstances where it makes sense to give a wild pitcher every opportunity to provide a walk.  The only caveat I'd add is that for good hitters that situation may also provide an opportunity to sit on a specific pitch and drive it hard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 27, 2011, 12:23:58 pm
There's also a significant difference between the value of a walk to a speedster versus a walk to a baseclogger. A walk to Tony Campana is much more likely to lead to scoring a run than a walk to ARam.

Campana reached base 37 times by hits, and 8 times by walks.  Only 1 of his hits was a HR, and 3 were doubles.  So 44 times on base.

ARam reached base 173 times by hits, and 43 times by walks.  Of his hits, 26 were HR, along with 35 doubles and 1 triple, so 190 times on base.

Campana scored 24 runs, 23 times of the 44 he was on base when the following hitter came up.  ARam scored 80 runs, or 54 times of the 190 times on base when the following hitter came up.

I know these are small sample sizes, but this has Campana scoring 52% of the time he reached base without a HR, and with nearly all of those times simply reaching 1B, and ARam's percentage was 28%.

It certainly would seem that a walk for Campana would have significantly more value than a walk for ARam.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 27, 2011, 12:42:59 pm
Did you account for Campana's pinch running appearances?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on October 27, 2011, 01:03:45 pm
For a guy like Campana, a walk is darn near the best outcome you could hope for.  That's far from the case with a guy like ARam except in unusual game circumstances.  It thus makes sense that Campana should be much less aggressive at the plate, willing to take hittable pitches when ahead in the count.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 27, 2011, 01:05:29 pm
On CTL the other night, Theo said that he doesn't believe that any hitter should go up to bat looking for a walk.  He said that walking was more of a "happy symptom" of controlling the strike zone (no relation) and grinding out at-bats.

That all is a result of improving pitch recognition.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 27, 2011, 01:19:12 pm
I don't doubt that some players just don't have the ability to draw walks, but I believe for the vast majority, it is more a matter of motivation than talent.

Every player can probably draw more walks if they're "motivated" to do so.  The problem is that many low-walk guys hurt other parts of their offensive game when they start thinking about taking pitches and drawing walks.  I think there is a talent or "tool" in controlling the strike zone---and some guys just don't have it.  It's not natural to them and they can't hit that way.  I suppose that if you get a HS guy at 18 or a Domincan guy who's even younger--you can get some "unformed" players at the player development stage and see if something can click regarding plate discipline.  But, I'm skeptical that you can really change a tool like that very much, if at all.  You can still scout HS players who seem to have a plate discipline tool--it's just harder.

I don't see plate discipline as akin to a mechanical part of a hitter's swing--that can be altered if the player is motivate--- but more akin to a tool like speed or hand-eye coordination.  You can help a guy become a somewhat better baserunner (although a lot of that is still natural instincts) but you can't make him faster.

The way to deal with this issue from an organziational standpoint is mostly about bringing guys into the system in the first place who have a talent for controlling the strike zone---and not so much trying to take free swingers and try to mold them into something they are not---trying to motivate them into discipline.  That's a losing propostion for the most part, I think.

Of course, some free swingers are still so good--or good enough--at what they do that they can still be an asset to a club.  One size does not fit all.   When Soriano could run and had athleticism--he was a good player.  And, there are even better examples.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 27, 2011, 01:48:19 pm
I'm guessing you don't really mean that drawing walks should be a goal for a hitter. 

What I mean is that, as a general rule, (yes, I realize that there are many exceptions to the rule), the goal for a hitter should be to get on base.  A guy with a .380 OBA is going to help the team offensively, regardless of how he gets there.  Obviously, if he has a .380 OBA because he hits 38 homers in every 100 at bats, that is better than if he walks 38 times in each 100 at bats, but there are a great many collateral advantages to a high percentage of walks.  It wears down the opponent's pitching staff (an advantage that should be obvious to Cub fans that consistantly see their starters struggle to reach the 6th inning, and it improves both slugging and batting average by reducing swinging at low percentage pitches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 27, 2011, 01:58:52 pm
Extra-base hits are better than singles, but singles are better than walks. Even Campana can't go from first to third if the batter behind him walks. I've never seen a super-OPB that values singles over walks, but perhaps there should be one.

And hitters who average five pitches per plate appearance are "better" than those that only average three.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 27, 2011, 02:08:40 pm
What I mean is that, as a general rule, (yes, I realize that there are many exceptions to the rule), the goal for a hitter should be to get on base.  A guy with a .380 OBA is going to help the team offensively, regardless of how he gets there.  Obviously, if he has a .380 OBA because he hits 38 homers in every 100 at bats, that is better than if he walks 38 times in each 100 at bats, but there are a great many collateral advantages to a high percentage of walks.  It wears down the opponent's pitching staff (an advantage that should be obvious to Cub fans that consistantly see their starters struggle to reach the 6th inning, and it improves both slugging and batting average by reducing swinging at low percentage pitches.

From my perspective, I would address this issue by a single AB--the micro, not the macro of .380 OBP or whatever. 

In most situations, the "goal for a hitter" should be to hit the ball hard with authority.  A good hitter hits.  Yes, if Ryan Theriot is leading off the 9th down a run or tied or similar, he gives off the "get on base however and whatever" vibe to everybody in the park---and that's what he should be doing in that situation and for his type of hitter.

But, most of the time, the non-Theriots of the world are up there to drive the ball.  Theo would say that the best way to get a pitch to drive the ball is to control the strike zone---favorable counts where you are most likely to get a pitch to drive.  If you don't get it, then the walk will result from controling the zone and that's fine too. It's a good result because you did not create an out and put a base runner on base.  But, I would not characterize the object of the AB as simply getting on base.  In most circumstances, there is more to an AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 27, 2011, 02:15:04 pm
The figure .380 was arbitrary, for purposes of illustration.

I don't believe that the purpose of each at bat is to hit the ball hard.  It is a good tool to have, but not a goal in itself.  If the first two guys in the inning walk, and you hit the first pitch hard, into a double play (which is probably as likely as a single), you haven't helped the team much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on October 27, 2011, 02:21:39 pm
Carlos Pena is an example of a hitter who controlled the strike zone, but as often as not was looking for a walk.  That helped his obp, but didn't do enough to drive in runs.  You're not looking for walks from the 4 or 5 hitter. 

that's why I don't think he's worth $10 million.  LaHair may not have his glove, but at 5% of the cost, I'll bet we get better offensive production.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 27, 2011, 02:53:41 pm
From my perspective, I  think Pena is rarely looking to walk when he comes to the plate. 

Seems to me that Pena is just about always looking to drive the ball.  For example, he loves to attack the first pitch, which is not characteristic of a guy looking to walk.  See link below--Pena put the first pitch in play 68 times last season and batted .441 when putting the first pitch in play.  (He swung and missed or fouled off the first pitch quite a bit too, I seem to recall).

Pena is a dead pull hitter and that hurts his on-base success, as the shift against him costs him a ton of base hits.  His approach is a big factor in his low batting average.  He looks to drive the ball by pulling the ball, the defense knows he tends to pull the ball and they put on an exaggerated shift, and base hits with a normal defense are often turned into outs against Pena. 

From Pena's perspective, it's worth it because his approach leads to extra-base hits and walks.  His willingness and ability to go deep into the count often results in walks----and also Ks.  It's a trade-off.  You can argue whether it's a good approach or not, but that's who he is.

I think Pena  has a good sense of how a favorable count is conducive to driving the ball.  He also knows that pitchers try to get ahead of the count on the first pitch and that's why he likes to jump on the first pitch, as do many hitters.  He's looking to drive the ball and he takes a walk when it presents itself as an alternative.

http://hosted.stats.com/mlb/getleaders.asp?rank=229
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 27, 2011, 03:18:15 pm
Did you account for Campana's pinch running appearances?

Good point.  No, I didn't.  And since he took the field in only 66 games, and appeared in 95 games, there were likely quite a few times he was in as a pinch runner, likely distorting the figures I looked at enough to leave them meaningless.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 27, 2011, 03:23:18 pm
I think there is a talent or "tool" in controlling the strike zone---and some guys just don't have it.  It's not natural to them and they can't hit that way.  I suppose that if you get a HS guy at 18 or a Domincan guy who's even younger--you can get some "unformed" players at the player development stage and see if something can click regarding plate discipline.  But, I'm skeptical that you can really change a tool like that very much, if at all.


This player's career, and his comments about the change he made in his approach at the plate, would indicate otherwise.  Not indicating that anyone can do it, but clearly indicating that you can "really change a tool like that very much."  http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/matthga01.shtml
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 27, 2011, 03:25:54 pm
And hitters who average five pitches per plate appearance are "better" than those that only average three.

All other things being equal, yes, but simply as a flat statement without regard to the hitters' actual production, no.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 27, 2011, 03:29:16 pm
You're not looking for walks from the 4 or 5 hitter.

Yes, you are.  You are looking for other things, too, but you are certainly looking for walks from the 4 or 5 hitter.  If you 4 or 5 hitter is not walking a fair amount, he is very unlikely to be doing much else that you want.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 27, 2011, 03:37:56 pm
The figure .380 was arbitrary, for purposes of illustration.

I don't believe that the purpose of each at bat is to hit the ball hard.  It is a good tool to have, but not a goal in itself.  If the first two guys in the inning walk, and you hit the first pitch hard, into a double play (which is probably as likely as a single), you haven't helped the team much.

In this example, should the batter "try to walk" rather than "try to drive the ball?"  Aside from basic principles, there is an opportunity for scoring runs against a struggling pitcher who is likely to groove a pitch to avoid walking yet another batter.  Another walk seems likely to result in that pitcher being replaced, perhaps by someone who is going to be tougher to hit.

But sometimes specific situations call for special approaches.  There are times that the batter has a goal of hitting the ball to the right side to move a runner to 3B, even if he gives himself up in the process.  That is different than driving the ball.  But other than special circumstances such as that one, my impression is that hitters, at least the good hitters, all have driving the ball to be their primary goal when they bat.

I've seen many  statements from fans who are big on OBA arguing that hitters should look to walk, or have increasing their walks as a goal.  DaveP is an articulate advocate for this point of view.

I've yet to hear or read any (successful) baseball professional make that argument.  Maybe some have, but I have missed it if so.  Some have argued that specific hitters should walk more, but not as a goal, rather as the result of being more selective.  Even the ones who are huge advocates of OBA seem to agree that the important thing is being disciplined in choosing which pitches to go after and which not to, with the primary purpose being to get a good pitch to hit ... not to get on base via the walk.  I don't think this is an old-school vs. new school distinction either. 

Can anyone provide an example of a hitting coach, manager, GM, scouting director, etc. who preaches that getting a walk should be a goal in itself?  Or even that driving the ball should not be the primary goal of a hitter?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 27, 2011, 03:57:04 pm
If the first two guys in the inning walk, the third guy should certainly try to walk, at least to the extent that he makes the pitcher throw a couple of strikes.  I would rather have the bases loaded and no one out than have two men on base with no one out.

Once every 7 or 8 at bats in that situation, swing, just to keep the pitcher honest.  But mostly, walk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on October 27, 2011, 04:14:20 pm
Not me.  If a pitcher walks the two previous guys, then he's probably going to be desperate to throw a strike and is liable to give the hitter a good pitch to hit.  I want hitters who are patient enough to get that pitch and good enough to captitalize on it (more often than not).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 27, 2011, 04:24:55 pm
From my perspective, I  think Pena is rarely looking to walk when he comes to the plate. 

Seems to me that Pena is just about always looking to drive the ball.  For example, he loves to attack the first pitch, which is not characteristic of a guy looking to walk.  See link below--Pena put the first pitch in play 68 times last season and batted .441 when putting the first pitch in play.    http://hosted.stats.com/mlb/getleaders.asp?rank=229

Barry Bonds walked 198 times in 2002, with 403 AB, and he walked 232 times in 2004, with 373 AB.  To me those figures would indicate that whatever else he might have been looking to do when he came to the plate, he certainly was not walk averse.

In 2002 Bonds put the ball in play 61 times and hit .410 when putting the first pitch in play, and in 2004 it was 70 times for a .414 BA. 

In 2008, when Ryan Theriot had 73 walks and certainly WAS often "looking for a walk" when he went to the plate, he put the first pitch in play 85 times, and hit  .412 when putting the first pitch in play.

So neither the number of times he put the ball in play, nor the BA when he did would seem to be a very strong indication of whether someone was or wasn't often "looking for a walk" when he goes to the plate.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 27, 2011, 05:22:07 pm
The Cubs have re-signed SS Jonathan Mota and OF James Adduci to minor league contracts
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on October 27, 2011, 06:24:11 pm
THEO!!!! I'm starting to believe!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 27, 2011, 08:04:12 pm
On CTL the other night, Theo said that he doesn't believe that any hitter should go up to bat looking for a walk.  He said that walking was more of a "happy symptom" of controlling the strike zone (no relation) and grinding out at-bats.

That all is a result of improving pitch recognition.

That is a common view.  Clearly only a limited number of Cubs have achieved any of those things, the happy symptom, the grinding, or the good pitch recognition. 

He repeatedly alludes to the "grinding out at-bats".  That has never been a target in Fleita's instruction manual.  Will be intersting to see how that may change. 

I do think that there is more than pitch recognition.  Fleita and Hendry have always talked about and valued pitch recognition, too.  But I think there's a part where it's not just recognizing, but also learning to lay off.  Pitch recognition is part, plate discipline is part.  That's what "strike zone" control would involve. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on October 27, 2011, 08:17:00 pm
There's also the battle between ego- wanting to smash the ball, be a hero, etc.- vs. focusing on what's best for the team in a particular situation.  Smart baseball and team baseball go hand in hand.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 27, 2011, 08:18:27 pm
Neither of which go hand in hand with the Chicago Cubs, unfortunately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 27, 2011, 10:09:45 pm
They will go together before too long, JeffH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on October 27, 2011, 10:24:18 pm
Is Jeff already lobbying to fire Hoyer and Epstein?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 28, 2011, 04:10:03 am
Lake: 1-5, 2 SB, E

Vitters: 0-5, E


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_27_msswin_scowin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 28, 2011, 09:50:05 am
Have to wonder about Vitters future with the Cubs with a new management team on board.

I suspect that much more than under Hendry, the Cubs will be looking at 2012  as something of a make or break year for Vitters, not necessarily making it to the majors, but at least making it to the point where it appears the lights have turned on upstairs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 28, 2011, 02:21:43 pm
I wouldn't be surprised if Vitters was part of the compensation package going to Boston.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 28, 2011, 07:00:20 pm
Cubs' Easterling Chose Baseball Over Football

By Phil Rogers
October 28, 2011
 (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/email.gif)E-mail (?subject=Baseball%20America:%20Cubs%27%20Easterling%20Chose%20Baseball%20Over%20Football&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseballamerica.com%2Fonline%2Fmajors%2Forganization-reports%2Fchicago-cubs%2F2011%2F2612547.html) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/print.gif)Print (http://bbf.createaforum.com/javascript:window.print%28%29)
 
CHICAGO—Taiwan Easterling was a top wide receiver at Florida State. He caught 108 career passes, including 43 as a junior last season, and seemed headed to a possible NFL career.

But Easterling made an abrupt about-face last summer. He had played just enough baseball at Florida State to get on the Cubs' radar, and was intrigued by the possibility of a career in a sport where he could do the hitting, not get hit.

Easterling, 22, walked away from the Seminoles after the Cubs took him in the 27th round of the draft. He signed for a bonus of $150,000 and hasn't looked back.
Cubs scouting director Tim Wilken said Easterling opened eyes with his ability to produce line drives around the park during instructional league.

"He looked great," Wilken said. "It looks like he can really hit—a good idea for a guy who was playing football on Saturdays last fall—and he runs well. Our guys are really excited about him."

While Easterling received more attention catching passes, he went to Florida State with two-sport intentions after the Marlins took him in the sixth-round out of Oak Grove High in Hattiesburg, Miss., in 2007. The Marlins drafted him again in 2010, this time in the 31st round, but he returned for another season at FSU. Easterling skipped spring football to play full-time for the Seminoles' baseball team in 2011. He slid in the draft because teams didn't realize how serious he was about baseball.

Easterling, who stands 5-foot-11, 195 pounds and runs the 40-yard dash in 4.5 seconds, was signed as part of a $20 million investment in amateur talent last summer. He adds to the Cubs' inventory of young outfielders, which is headed by Matt Szczur.

After signing in late June, Easterling played 48 games in the Cubs system, including 40 at low Class A Peoria. He batted .307/.332/.407 overall with two homers, 17 RBIs and 10 stolen bases.

Cubbyhole

• Wilken also praised outfielder Shawon Dunston Jr. for his work at instructional league. He homered on back-to-back days at one point, displaying the power that Wilken projected when the Cubs gave him a $1.275 million bonus.

• Shortstop Junior Lake, who split last season between high Class A and Double-A, got off to a fast start in the Arizona Fall League. He had four home runs and nine stolen bases in his first 12 games, batting .327/.400/.673.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 28, 2011, 07:48:58 pm
LeMahieu: 1-4, SB, K

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_28_msswin_perwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 29, 2011, 05:30:47 pm
Vitters: 3-4, HR, RBI, K

Lake: 1-4, HR, RBI, K

Cashner: 1-3-3-3-0-1

Carpenter: 1-1-0-0-0-0


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_29_perwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 30, 2011, 02:10:22 pm
Nice story about Mat Szczur visiting a third grade class

http://www.capemaycountyherald.com/article/people/cold+spring/77507-szczur+hits+homerun+third+graders (http://www.capemaycountyherald.com/article/people/cold+spring/77507-szczur+hits+homerun+third+graders)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 30, 2011, 06:50:37 pm
Chris Carpenter talks about being a reliever instead of a starter and his chances of making it to Wrigley in 2012

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-1031-cubs-carpenter--20111031,0,5491073.story (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-1031-cubs-carpenter--20111031,0,5491073.story)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 30, 2011, 07:00:36 pm
Carpenter looked absolutely horrible in his cup of coffee last season, but it might be worth keeping him around for one more season to see what he can do with a genuine major league pitching coach (assuming Clown Riggins gets the heave-ho).

Unless, of course, another organization has some sort of unnatural interest in Carpenter and Epoyer can trade him for something worthwhile.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 30, 2011, 10:19:44 pm
I like Carpenter's arm but am kinda hoping that he's part of a compensation package because his control is so poor and his 100 MPH fastball is so straight and hittable.

I would rather they save his roster spot for someone whose command is better, even if his fastball lacks the dazzling velocity (if such a person exists in the Cubs system).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on October 30, 2011, 11:59:42 pm
Quote
Epoyer

Did you consider Hoystein?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 31, 2011, 07:11:33 am
No, I didn't.  Maybe that's better, huh?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 31, 2011, 08:56:55 am
Quote from: Down On The Farm
Arizona Fall League
The Mesa Solar Sox went 3-3 for the week to maintain their record of a game under .500 at 11-12. Cubs' hitters saw some reduced playing time, but the rest proved beneficial to some. D.J. LeMahieu batted .400 for the week to raise his overall average to .297. LeMahieu also stole four bases to improve his total to ten, second in the league. Josh Vitters went 4-for-14 to maintain his .355 average while cracking his third home run of the fall. However, things weren't so rosy for Junior Lake. After being player-of-the-week last week, Lake slumped a little by going only 2-for-18. But Lake did steal two bases to raise his total to 13, tying an AFL record.

 
Proving to be virtually unhittable in Arizona has been Chris Carpenter. The flame-throwing righty had two more appearances, allowing no earned runs in three innings while striking out three batters. Opposing hitters are now down to a .200 average against Carpenter. Marcus Hatley is beginning to show some signs of life after being knocked around a bit. Hatley did give up three earned runs in three innings this week, but picked up his first victory on Saturday. Trey McNutt struggled in his only start on Tuesday, letting in three earned runs in 2.1 innings while striking out two batters. After suffering what was claimed to be a "minor" injury, Andrew Cashner was back on the mound this week and served up three earned runs in an inning of work on Saturday.
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 31, 2011, 06:46:08 pm
Lake: 1-4, 3B, SB, K

LaMahieu: 0-4, K


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_31_msswin_pddwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 31, 2011, 06:52:57 pm
Lake: 1-4, 3B, SB, K

LaMahieu: 0-4, K


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_10_31_msswin_pddwin_1
LeMahieu was at 3B for a change.  I wonder why.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 01, 2011, 01:57:13 pm
Chris Carpenter and Trey McNutt have been named to the AFL Rising Stars team.  MLB Network will televise the game on November 5 at 7:00 P.M. Central Time
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 01, 2011, 06:24:06 pm
Junior Lake has been added to the East squad for the AFL Rising Stars game on Saturday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 01, 2011, 06:38:52 pm
Vitters: 1-5, 2B

Lake: 0-4, BB, SB, K

LeMahieu: 1-5

McNutt: 3-4-3-3-1-3, 3 HR

Cashner: 1-3-2-2-0-0


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_01_msswin_surwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 01, 2011, 06:59:11 pm
Send McNutt to Boston.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 01, 2011, 07:01:46 pm
Vitters: 1-5, 2B

Lake: 0-4, BB, SB, K

LeMahieu: 1-5

McNutt: 3-4-3-3-1-3, 3 HR

Cashner: 1-3-2-2-0-0


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_01_msswin_surwin_1
And McNutt makes the Rising Stars game?  That must be a hitters league and then some.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 02, 2011, 07:54:31 am
Wasn't sure which thread to use, but since this is about Jason McLeod, I've placed it here.  Good article on McLeod from Dave van Dyck.  Provides some background on the personal relationship between Theo and Jason, as well as Jason's history as a scouting director.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-1102-mcleod-cubs-chicago--20111102,0,2238356,full.story (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-1102-mcleod-cubs-chicago--20111102,0,2238356,full.story)

Pretty impressive record from his years in Boston, with six draft choices all playing with a World Series winning team three years after being drafted.  Wow.

But McLeod also shared some examples of his own mistakes including his failure to draft David Freese: "that's one of my worst (mistakes) because my assistant for three rounds said we needed to take Freese."






Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 02, 2011, 08:44:05 am
Were McLeod and Hoyer in San Diego when they gave Freese to StL for Edmonds?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 02, 2011, 08:53:07 am
Were McLeod and Hoyer in San Diego when they gave Freese to StL for Edmonds?

Interesting question.  The answer is no.  Freese was traded in Dec 2007, while Hoyer was hired in October, 2009.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 02, 2011, 12:27:30 pm
Another article on McLeod taking over the farm operations.  This is interesting I think.

Quote
While Epstein, Hoyer and McLeod will be the new faces at Wrigley, implementing their ‘Cubs Way', there will be a few holdovers from the previous regime. Chief among them, as far as McLeod is concerned, are vice president of player personnel Oneri Fleita and scouting director Tim Wilken. Fleita likely will have a large hand in what happens as far as the Cubs' presence in Latin America goes, but just by looking at his title, it would seem that Wilken's role may be a tad superfluous with McLeod's arrival.

However, Epstein's desire to build a large, strong front office by keeping the best and the brightest a part of this organization makes the assumption that Wilken won't be needed premature. McLeod said it was too early to define what the exact structure of the scouting department would be, but it would hardly be a leap to say that McLeod would be the man in charge on draft day, a task previously held by Wilken.

For one thing, the article talks about Fleita's international reponsiblities and not his player development responsibilities.  Maybe (hopefully) that's a clue that McLeod won't have Fleita oversee player development anymore.

The article also mentions again that it hasn't been determined whether Wilken will continue to run the draft or not.


http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/7027/mcleod-to-change-cubs-draft-philosophy

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 02, 2011, 02:33:20 pm
We can expect great things from the new management.

In the 2006 Boston draft, the Red Sox had 9 picks in the first 5 rounds of the draft.  They had 4 picks in the first round alone and 2 picks in the third round. 

The Cubs that year had only 2 picks in the first 5 rounds of the draft.

Numbers like that show up in the results on the field. 

In 2011, one player out of those 9 picks played in the majors for Boston. 

In 2011, two players out of those 2 picks played in the majors for the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 02, 2011, 02:40:11 pm
But 2007 was a much different year.

In the entire 2007 draft, only two had made it to the majors and played for the Cubs by 2011.

That was only two more than did so for Boston.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 02, 2011, 02:44:11 pm
But Boston was much more consistant that the Cubs in drafting.  They managed to repeat their success in the 2008 draft, no draftees making it to the majors by 2011.

The Cubs, on the other hand, were nothing like the Red Sox.  They actually had two players reach the majors from that draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 02, 2011, 02:47:14 pm
In 2009, the Cubs success rate dropped in half, with only one making it to the majors by 2011. 

Boston, however, did not slip a bit, with the same number reaching the majors as had in the previous two years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 02, 2011, 03:08:14 pm
The AFL Rising Stars game rosters have been announced, and Chris Carpenter, Trey McNutt, and Junior Lake made the team. BA had some quick notes on the players selected, including this one on our top pitching prospect, McNutt.

Quote
Trying to bounce back, showing good fastball velocity (93-96 mph) but throwing little else

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/winter-baseball/arizona-fall-league/2011/2612561.html (http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/winter-baseball/arizona-fall-league/2011/2612561.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 02, 2011, 03:18:39 pm
Dave, you're ignoring the draftees used in trade.  But, of course, you already knew that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 02, 2011, 03:30:01 pm
Justin Masterson, drafted in 2006, was used in a trade for Victor martinez, and pitched for Cleveland in 2011.

You used the word in the plural.  Are there others that were used in trades that played in the majors in 2011?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 02, 2011, 03:54:58 pm
Anthony Rizzo, traded for Adrian Gonzalez.  But what does it matter if they played in the majors in 2011?  They were drafted and turned into excellent value for the major league club.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 02, 2011, 04:48:23 pm
Then shouldn't we mention the minor leaguers that were traded for Garza.

The fact is that since Wilken can on board, the Cubs have had more productive drafts than the Red Sox, in spite of the many more picks that Boston had, and the stats emphasis by Theo and team.

I am glad we got Epstein.  Just don't expect him to duplicate his success in Boston immediately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 02, 2011, 05:10:14 pm
I do think it can be instructive to look back at all the results in Boston ... and San Diego.  Hoyer and, more importantly as it pertains to the draft, McLeod were in San Diego since the fall of 2009.   Based on DaveP's account, the early successes in the draft (and development) process seem not to have been sustained.  Don't know if that's an accurate assessment or not.

I have no idea what has happened with the guys drafted during the period DaveP cited.  Some were used for trades  as mentioned (don't know how many, but I thought several were in the Gonzalez trade).  Are some blocked by players already on the Sox, either by players drafted earlier by McLeod (such as Pedroia, Ellsbury, Youkilis, Lester, Bucholz and Bard) or others brought in from outside the organization?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 02, 2011, 06:30:45 pm
Vitters: 2-5, 2B, 2 RBI

Beliveau: 1-0-0-0-0-1

Carpenter: 1-3-2-2-0-2

Hatley: 1-0-0-0-0-0


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_02_msswin_pddwin_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 02, 2011, 06:48:16 pm
Vitters: 2-5, 2B, 2 RBI

Beliveau: 1-0-0-0-0-1

Carpenter: 1-3-2-2-0-2

Hatley: 1-0-0-0-0-0


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_02_msswin_pddwin_1 (http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_02_msswin_pddwin_1)


Brett Jackson played quite a bit in the World Cup games but had only one pinch hit AB in the Pan Am Games due to his foot injury.  I wonder if that is keeping him from going to the AFL like Beliveau.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 02, 2011, 07:49:40 pm

Lot of luck with the best of the drafters.  The point that Boston did not sustain notable draft success is noteworthy, though. I'd thought about that when boston's pitching totally fell apart.  Shouldn't there have been a stock of McLeod picks ready to step up? 


I do think that "reaching" the majors is an uncertain gage. 
1.  Wilken went pretty dominantly college for a while, and that helped to produce major leaguers like colvin, Campana, Josh Harrison, Carpenter, Coleman, and Guyer.  They got there, which is something.  But will they ever get beyond fringe-player status?  I don't know. 
2.  It stands to reason that college picks might make it faster than HS picks.   From this draft, if Tony Zych makes it to the majors and does so faster than the HS picks, that won't necessarily prove that he's a better pick than the HS picks. 
3.  Simply reaching the majors is something of a function of opportunity.    The Cub roster has provided plenty of opportunities.  When you commit massive budget portion to Z, Soriano,and Silva, you're forced to fill other spots with prospects. 


Wilken and Fleita have often talked up the volume of draftees and prospects that they've delivered to the major leagues.   But a lot have been in the Campana, Josh Harrison, Carpenter, Clevenger, Dolis, Lemahieu, Guyer mode this year; Justin berg, Mateo, Castillo, coleman, Colvin last year.  A lot of interchangeable 25th men, and not a lot of Castro types. 


So as Jeff always says, producing a lot of Campana's and Carpenter's is not quite as meaningful as producing quality starters.  Hopefully the system will be improving in the latter area soon, and that was true with or without McLeod. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on November 02, 2011, 07:54:41 pm
Our new guys aren't miracle workers.   They're going to make mistakes.   However, our front office will now be far more thorough, organized and analytical...and that should help them produce better results over time.

We haven't won a single playoff game in 8 years and the current state of our franchise isn't real hot.    JIm Hendry was likely rather burned out well before the end of his tenure.    The young guys will very likely be a MAJOR upgrade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 02, 2011, 08:13:26 pm
Judging a farm system or a farm director the way I did is silly.  I did it merely to point out that the way Hendry and Theo have been judged is equally silly.

Wood and Prior failed to have productive big league careers.  Should Hendry have known that they would be injured?  Simpson has been terrible.  Should Wilken have known that he would get mono?  Hendry is a fool because he signed Soriano.  But Theo signed Lackey.  Hendry got skinned when he signed Fukudome for so much money.  But Theo signed the Japanese pitcher for even more money, and who was equally mediocre.  Wilken was ridiculed when he "reached" to sign Colvin.  But Colvin has done more at the major league level than most of Theo's first round picks that year, and Theo had FOUR such picks that year.

Theo has been operating with a budget about 50 million per year higher than Hendry.  How good would Hendry have looked if he has an extra 50 million each year to play around with.

I am glad that we got Theo and Hoyer. 

And I am glad that they are saying all the right things. 

And I am glad that most fans are excited about the future. 

But I have been around long enough to remember how glad I was when we got Dallas Green, and Gordon Goldsberry, and McPhail, and Hendry. 

And I have been around long enough to remember how they all said the right things. 

And I have been around long enough to remember how most fans were excited about the future. 

And I have been around long enough to remember how the excitement turned to jeers as each one failed to meet the expectations of the fans.

To be honest, I am most excited about having Ricketts as the new owner.  At least we have a track record of a couple of years with him. and so far he has actually seemed to try to do those things that he said he would do.  I am much more excited about the money we spent on international signings last year than I am about bringing Theo in.  I am much more excited about the money we spent on domestic signings last year than I am about bringing Theo in.

In my opinion, Cub management has worked under terrible ownership for the past 75 years, and has probably done about as well as can be expected.  Hopefully, the new ownership will continue to keep me excited.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 02, 2011, 10:11:07 pm
But, Dave.... Theo is also REALLY smart.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 02, 2011, 11:07:29 pm
Actually, I think he is.  And he is probably smarter and better than Hendry.

But that, alone, is not always sufficient for success.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 03, 2011, 03:37:35 am
I am quite optimistic about the Cubs' future, although I expect 2012 and 2013 to be lean years. Ricketts has already

demonstrated his willingness to spend aggressively in the draft and international free agent market. He also spent

to bring in Theo, Jed and Jason. I have confidence in Wilken (draft) and Fleita (international scouting and DR facilities).

I hope the Theocracy can fix the player development area, which I've long considered a major weakness.

The Cubs will pick early in the first round, at least once and I hope twice (Pena) or three times (Pena and

Wood) in the supplemental round, and hopefully won't give up their second-round pick for a Type A free

agent. They'll also pay overslot bonuses to some later draft picks, and spend for international talent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on November 03, 2011, 04:37:01 am
I hope we sign Pujols
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 03, 2011, 07:40:33 am
Davep, remind me what email addy you're using.  My computer, I think, is locking on to the one that doesn't work.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 03, 2011, 07:47:13 am
buff, even if we offered substantially more money, I don't think Pujols would join the Cubs.  I really don't believe he's like Roger Clemens selling his arm to Toronto, Boston, and New York.

I think his disdain and dislike of the Cubs is real.  I could see him switching leagues, but I don't see him joining a team that would make regular trips into Busch Stadium.  This guy really loves the Cards.  Take a guy like Dempster.  Dempster loves the Cubs and makes it obvious, but if he got traded, he would go.  There are some guys in baseball who I think would hang it up rather than play for a rival, and Pujols, I think, may be one of them.  But money talks and if he could play somewhere where he seldom had to hit against the bat and birds, he probably would.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 03, 2011, 09:05:35 am
Davep, remind me what email addy you're using.  My computer, I think, is locking on to the one that doesn't work.
You can always click on someone's name and then "send personal message" without knowing their E-Mail address and even if they don't disclose it to the board.  The message appears in "My messages" at the top of all screens
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 03, 2011, 09:24:45 am
duh...I know that.  I are an administrator.  The problem is I think the email Dave had on here is the one that doesn't always work.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 03, 2011, 11:46:01 am
Curt

daveapol@yahoo.com
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 03, 2011, 12:06:10 pm
Yeah, that's not the one you have on here.  Mail.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 03, 2011, 01:07:52 pm
I changed the one in the profile.  However, I used the new one to send a message to the old one, and it worked fine.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on November 03, 2011, 01:14:29 pm
Schizo
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 03, 2011, 02:35:10 pm
Sending emails to yourself to avoid loneliness?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 03, 2011, 02:36:37 pm
I HAVE to talk to myself.  Otherwise, I can't get an intelligent conversation around here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 03, 2011, 05:54:03 pm
Lake: 3-5, 2B, 3B, RBI, SB, E  (GW-ing RBI 2B in the bottom of the 9th)

Lemahieu: 0-4


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_03_pddwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 03, 2011, 08:26:05 pm
Lake: 3-5, 2B, 3B, RBI, SB, E  (GW-ing RBI 2B in the bottom of the 9th)

Lemahieu: 0-4


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_03_pddwin_msswin_1 (http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_03_pddwin_msswin_1)
I was at Hohokam for the game and was not impressed with the place.  It's age is showing and the field is not in very good shape.   And it's not a real ballpark if you can't get popcorn.

Game time temp was  78°.  There were a few high thin clouds from time to time and mostly calm winds except for once in a while when there was a slight breeze from the right field corner to the left field corner. All in all, a perfect day to watch baseball in November.

Junior Lake's error was a terrible throw that pulled LeMahieu way off the bag at first.  Neither Lake or LeMahieu had any tough chances.

Lake lined a single to left in the first, tripled to the gap in right center, and his double in the bottom of the ninth was a liner over the head of the center fielder.

LeMahieu hit the ball very hard his first two times up then singled on a soft liner to right.

16 walks made the game hard to watch.


One thing I learned is that Jeff Beliveau is on the taxi squad and is allowed to pitch only on Wednesday and Saturday.


There were about twenty scouts sitting behind the plate.  A couple of them looked familiar but that was it.

The seventh inning stretch was a tape of Harry singing "Take Me Out To The Ballgame".  After Lake's hit won the game they played Go Cubs, Go
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 04, 2011, 03:31:45 pm
Cubs minor league free agents:
 
Chicago Cubs (13)
RHP:
Justin Berg (AAA), Austin Bibens-Dirkx (AAA), Marco Carrillo (AA), Robert Coello (AAA), Angel Guzman (Hi A), Dylan Johnston (Lo A), Carlton Smith (AAA), Alvaro Sosa (Lo A), Jeff Stevens (AA)
C: Mario Mercedes (AAA), Chris Robinson (AAA)
1B: John Urick (Hi A)
3B: Scott Moore (AAA)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 04, 2011, 07:25:05 pm
Vitters: 1-5

LeMahieu: 3-5, HR, 3 RBI

Hatley: 2/3 -2-0-0-0-1

Cashner: 1-1-0-0-1-1, SV


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_04_srrwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 05, 2011, 04:34:43 pm
A Chinese Taipei Allstar team is currently playing a team of MLB players.  The games have been on the MLB network.  I think one of the last games of the series is currently on.

Here is some information from an article on the series. 

"Two more exciting prospects on display here are in the Cubs system.

Twenty-year-old outfielder Pin-Chieh Chen, who has been playing second base for the Chinese Taipei team this week, hit .301 with 20 stolen bases in 60 games for short-season Boise of the Northwest League. His Boise teammate, Chinese Taipei starter Yao-Lin Wang, had a 3.22 ERA in 14 starts for Boise and struck out 77 batters in 67 innings. He turns 21 in February."
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: sam hannam on November 05, 2011, 04:43:03 pm
I really look forward to Peoria's team next year.  They should get a lot of these good players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 05, 2011, 05:29:52 pm
Junior Lake starts at short tonight in the AFL Rising Stars game.  Too bad it's on MLBN at the same time as LSU/Alabama is on CBS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 05, 2011, 05:49:23 pm
That's why God invented DVRs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 05, 2011, 06:38:31 pm
God did not invent DVRs.

He WAS a majority stockholder in the company that did, however.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on November 05, 2011, 06:39:03 pm
That's why God invented DVRs.

Damn you, Jeff!

I was gonna post the exact same thing.

(http://www.chineseamericanprincess.com/mtblog/images/georgemichael_snoopy.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 05, 2011, 07:12:47 pm
First at bat, Lake fouls a balll off his ankel.  He may have to come out of the game.

Nope, he is staying in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 05, 2011, 07:13:15 pm
Took a called strike three.  Should have come out of the game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: AndyMacFAIL on November 05, 2011, 07:32:27 pm
Took a called strike three.  Should have come out of the game.

...and then made an error on a bad throw in the bottom of the 1st.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 05, 2011, 07:38:27 pm
He's ready to be a Cub!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 05, 2011, 08:54:08 pm
Junior Lake has looked not so good at SS in the Rising Stars game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 05, 2011, 10:06:35 pm
Lake: 1-3, 2B, 2 K, E

McNutt: 1/3 IP, K

Carpenter: 2/3 IP


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_05_afewin_afwwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 07, 2011, 07:49:14 am
Down On The Farm with a fairly glowing report on a number of Cubs pitchers doing well in the winter leagues.  They even mention Australia.

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/11/cubsminor110711.php#more
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 07, 2011, 08:13:20 am
Wasn't Bibens-Dirkx recently exposed to Rule 5?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 07, 2011, 10:59:41 am
Rule 5 draft takes place on December 8 this year.  Don't know if he was exposed last December.

I believe he was taken off the 40 man roster, and because of this was subject to waivers, but I am not certain.

In any event, I believe he may be a 6 year minor free agent, and if so can sign with anyone he wants, unless the Cubs put him on the 40 man roster this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 07, 2011, 12:09:48 pm
Today's game between the Mesa Solar Sox and the Peoria Javelinas has been cancelled due to wet grounds.

What is a javelina?  I had one in my back yard a couple months ago.

(https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQhQgvWP-XaabLA9X28NGpfV7_0nc_TyjLtON8Llqa77rxOTblRlQ)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 07, 2011, 01:27:18 pm
A big rodent.

Looks like a pig, but is closely related to the rat.  We used to hunt them with pistols in Texas.  They taste pretty good.  Rather like pork, but less fatty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on November 07, 2011, 01:37:50 pm
With the concerns about Junior Lake's defense despite his above average arm, and his above average bat, would he profile as maybe a corner OFer? I think there was talk a couple of yrs ago about him maybe being a candidate for CF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 07, 2011, 01:39:17 pm
A big rodent.

Looks like a pig, but is closely related to the rat.  We used to hunt them with pistols in Texas.  They taste pretty good.  Rather like pork, but less fatty.

Isn't that what they use to make White Castle's?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 07, 2011, 02:00:17 pm
White Castles are 100 % pure "mystery meat".  If they let people know what is in it, prices of that meat would soar.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 07, 2011, 02:01:51 pm
Some scouts think that Lake will eventually end up as a right fielder, if not a third baseman.  The biggest question is whether he will make enough contact to play any position.

Several scouts believe that his best future would be as a pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 07, 2011, 05:06:15 pm
When I saw Lake make a bad throw at Hohokam last week, he also had some trouble throwing to first between innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 07, 2011, 05:09:47 pm
Tennessee Smokies named top minor league organization

http://tennessee.smokies.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111107&content_id=25926982&vkey=news_t553&fext=.jsp&sid=t553
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 07, 2011, 06:30:40 pm

If you could choose between David Freese and Junior Lake who would you choose? Who would Cardinal fans choose (two months ago)?

With respect to the pitchers having a good winter: Three of them are minor league free agents: Marco Carrillo, Austin Bibens-Dirkx, and Robert Coello.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 07, 2011, 06:41:24 pm
Today's game between the Mesa Solar Sox and the Peoria Javelinas has been cancelled due to wet grounds.

What is a javelina?  I had one in my back yard a couple months ago.

(https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQhQgvWP-XaabLA9X28NGpfV7_0nc_TyjLtON8Llqa77rxOTblRlQ)

Though I have no doubt Dave hunted and ate javelinas, he is not very good at identifying their genus.  They are NOT rodents.  Javelinas, also called peccaries, are essentially a wild pig.  They are not the same species as true wild pigs in the Americas, because true wild pigs were brought over to the Americas from Europe as domesticated livestock which ran wild and became feral (pigs in the 1600's were not kept in pens, but simply ran wild with their owners counting on keeping in them in the general area by tossing out the garbage, and then killing and slaughtering as the need arose).

They also can become quite dangerous if cornered.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 07, 2011, 06:55:03 pm
Those Texans I hunted with must have been liars.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 07, 2011, 07:11:54 pm
The things weigh 40-80 pounds.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 08, 2011, 06:20:59 pm
Lake: 0-3, BB, 2 K

LeMahieu: 2-4, 2 RBI, 2 SB

McNutt: 2-3-1-0-0-1

Hatley: 1-1-0-0-0-1


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_08_msswin_perwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 09, 2011, 06:30:58 pm
Vitters: 3-4, HR, RBI, SB, PO

LeMahieu: 1-5, RBI, SB

Cashner: 1-0-0-0-0-2

Beliveau: 1-0-0-0-0-1

Carpenter: 1-1-0-0-0-1

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_09_srrwin_msswin_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 10, 2011, 06:17:44 pm
Vitters: 1-4, 2B, SF, RBI

Lake: 1-5, 2 K

LeMahieu: 1-5, 2B, 2 RBI, K

 
http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_10_pddwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 11, 2011, 12:15:43 pm
The MLB Network is televising tonight's game between the Mesa Solar Sox and the Salt River Rafters from Salt River Fields at Talking Stick.  The United Concordia Dental Military Appreciation Game will be at  1800 in Chicago.  It will be a chilly evening.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111111&content_id=25954516&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111111&content_id=25954516&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 11, 2011, 05:32:52 pm
The MLB Network is televising tonight's game between the Mesa Solar Sox and the Salt River Rafters from Salt River Fields at Talking Stick.  The United Concordia Dental Military Appreciation Game will be at  1800 in Chicago.  It will be a chilly evening.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111111&content_id=25954516&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111111&content_id=25954516&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb)

Junior Lake bats third and is the DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 11, 2011, 05:54:00 pm
Time change - the game is at 1900 CST
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on November 11, 2011, 09:39:47 pm
2 RBI, BB, K a single and a stolen base so far for Junior Lake tonight.

I saw one AB and he grounded to short.

Somebody get that young man a steak!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on November 11, 2011, 09:47:12 pm
Marcus Hatley limped off the field after turning his ankle on a play as he was late covering first base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 12, 2011, 04:39:56 pm
Vitters: 0-3, RBI, HBP

Lake: 1-4

LeMahieu: 2-5, K

Beliveau: 1-3-3-3-0-3, HR

Cashner: 1-0-0-0-0-0


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_12_msswin_pddwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 14, 2011, 10:23:27 am
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2012/2612580.html

1. Brett Jackson, of
2. Javier Baez, ss
3. Matt Szczur, of
4. Trey McNutt, rhp
5. Dillon Maples, rhp
6. Wellington Castillo, c
7. Rafael Dolis, rhp
8. Junior Lake, ss
9. Josh Vitters, 3b/1b
10. Dan Vogelbach, 1b
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 14, 2011, 10:51:36 am
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2012/2612580.html

1. Brett Jackson, of
2. Javier Baez, ss
3. Matt Szczur, of
4. Trey McNutt, rhp
5. Dillon Maples, rhp
6. Wellington Castillo, c
7. Rafael Dolis, rhp
8. Junior Lake, ss
9. Josh Vitters, 3b/1b
10. Dan Vogelbach, 1b

Interesting list.  I'm glad to see Vogelbach included and something tells me that he's going to do a lot better than any of us expected when he was drafted.  I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up out performing many of those listed above him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 14, 2011, 11:03:32 am
Many reports I have heard indicate that Vogelbach is likely to be the best player to come out of the Cubs draft last year, equal in potential only to Baez.

They have Castillo rated WAY higher than I have him.

Interesting to see Dolis that high.

VERY interesting to see Lake that high.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 14, 2011, 11:12:41 am
Wait a sec.  I thought I read somewhere that we drafted a college closer that was almost major league ready...can't come up with his name...but he's not on that list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on November 14, 2011, 11:30:54 am
Zych
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 14, 2011, 11:46:09 am
Yeah...thanks, Dave.  I heard he could be a step away from making the bigs.  Why isn't he on the top 10?  Because he's a closer?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on November 14, 2011, 11:51:17 am
Curious to see where Candelerio shakes out. Held out hope a publication like BA would have him top 10. But glad that Vogelbach is on the list -- he definitely seems like the type of kid who will be an offensive force as he moves up the organizational ladder.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 14, 2011, 12:01:00 pm
I'm surprised that Castillo and Dolis made the list, and very disappointed that Jeimer Candelario didn't.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on November 14, 2011, 12:11:06 pm
That has to be one of the ten worst top 10s in the game right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 14, 2011, 03:21:01 pm
Zych gets good reports, but "a step away from the bigs" is probably excessive for someone that has pitched so little professionally.

The reports I have on him is that he is very similar to Carpenter in potential, but is still rather raw.  Fastball in the high 90s and a very good slider that he has trouble commanding well.

I am more surprised that Candelario isn't on the list, although obviously not everyone can make the list.  Baseball America essentially makes their list based upon reports by minor league managers, coaches and scouts.  Since Candelario was seen by so few of those, having played only in the DR, he is probably too unknown to be much reported on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 14, 2011, 04:44:29 pm
I had hoped that the combination of his DSL statistics and his success in the AFL would be enough to place him in the Top Ten. He appears to have a good batting eye (almost as many walks as K's), good BA, good OBP, good SLG and the arm and bat required to play 3B. He's also a switch hitter, though his stats are better batting left. I expect him to start 2012 at Peoria or (far less likely) Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 14, 2011, 07:20:23 pm
I would love to have Candelario start in Peoria.  But I don't think very many 18 year olds start that high or higher.  They often keep the DR prospects in EXT for a while to get them acclimated to the US.  But I believe I remember reading that he speaks very good English.  I wonder how old he was before he left the US.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 14, 2011, 08:51:59 pm
I'm glad to see Vogelbach included and something tells me that he's going to do a lot better than any of us expected when he was drafted.

I mentioned at the time that Vogelbach was the pick which I liked most in the draft.  Still is.  Some of us were pretty high on him from the start....

Just like I was high on Choi....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 14, 2011, 09:09:17 pm
I think Candelario is probably better off in Mesa.  I think there is more organized instruction there.  My sense is that once a guy gets to full-season, mostly it's a matter of playing but they don't take a lot of time for coaching or practice once the play-every-day season starts. 

Given Candelerio's challenges defensively, he might be better served to be in a more practice/coaching-intensive environment. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 14, 2011, 09:19:45 pm
My sense is that once a guy gets to full-season, mostly it's a matter of playing but they don't take a lot of time for coaching or practice once the play-every-day season starts.   

I agree that is likely the way that it is done.... and it would be one of the things I would most strongly applaud to see changed.  Add more pre-game AND post-game instruction at the minor league AND major league levels.  My understanding is that virtually no teams have anything remotely resembling regular post game performance reviews, and that there is relatively little done on a daily basis pre-game either.  Considering the investment the teams have in facilities and player contracts, and the investment each player has in his own performance and career, it is surprising that as near as I can tell no one has ever even tried it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 14, 2011, 09:43:30 pm
Lake: 1-4, 2B, RBI, K

LeMahieu: 1-4


McNutt: 4-2-2-1-2-1

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_14_perwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 14, 2011, 10:06:58 pm
I agree that is likely the way that it is done.... and it would be one of the things I would most strongly applaud to see changed.  Add more pre-game AND post-game instruction at the minor league AND major league levels.  My understanding is that virtually no teams have anything remotely resembling regular post game performance reviews, and that there is relatively little done on a daily basis pre-game either.  Considering the investment the teams have in facilities and player contracts, and the investment each player has in his own performance and career, it is surprising that as near as I can tell no one has ever even tried it.

That is the biggest area where football is WAY ahead of baseball.  They should have team meetings where they go over game films with everyone, and critique everything.  Granted, they play too many games to be able to do it every day, but they certainly should do it once a week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 14, 2011, 10:43:26 pm
Dave, there is no reason they could not go over 15-20 minutes worth of game video after every game.  Give them half an hour to shower and change, and by that time coaches could have the video ready and go over it, perhaps even breaking into groups, since SS and catchers (as well as other positions) might not need to view the same video regarding their defense.  It would not need to be two or three hours of film review, but 15-20 minutes after every game might do wonders to reinforce instruction.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 15, 2011, 12:47:13 am
It might also be something that could be done on team bus rides.  if the busses were equipped with some big TV's and a good sound system, some of the long bus rides, where the players are already constrained to being together and sitting around anyway, could be put to some use. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on November 15, 2011, 02:04:21 pm
Part 1- Jim Callis chat on BA Cubs top 10 list:

Jim Callis: Before we start, let me mention that I'm still juggling the 11-30 order. The Cubs are a hard system to put in order because there are diverging opinions on many of their prospects, both within and without the organization.


@Jaypers413 (IL): What have you heard about international 3B prospect Jeimer Candelario? Did he make your top 30?

Jim Callis: Very promising switch-hitting bat. A long ways away, but he could be a plus hitter with at least average power. He will have to work hard to avoid a move to first base, however. He's in the middle of the 11-30 range.


Keith (Manchester, CT): Thanks, Jim. I'm a big fan of Javier Baez. Given the Cubs situation at 3rd, do they try to rush Baez through the system, and either way, how quickly does he get to the majors?

Jim Callis: I am too. Baez has the potential to have a very special bat. I don't think they'll try to rush him even though they currently need a third baseman, because they have several 3B candidates to sort through ahead of him (Vitters, LeMahieu, Flaherty, Lake). The Cubs aren't afraid to push guys, either, and I think Baez' bat will dictate how fast he moves. He'll start 2012 in low Class A, and if his bat is as good as advertised, he could be knocking on the door in 2014.


Ben (Leland Grove): Between this year's top 10 and last year's, which do you prefer and why?

Jim Callis: Brett Jackson, Trey McNutt, Josh Vitters, Matt Szczur and Rafael Dolis were on both lists. So that makes it Chris Archer, Hak-Ju Lee, Chris Carpenter, Hayden Simpson and Brandon Guyer (2010) vs. Javier Baez, Dillon Maples, Welington Castillo, Junior Lake and Dan Vogelbach (2011). I'll give a slight edge to 2011 because I like Baez so much and Simpson is a huge question mark right now.


Laura (Chitown): Just how close was it for the top spot between Jackson and Baez?

Jim Callis: Extremely close. There were three candidates for No. 1. In order of ceilings, it would be Baez, Szczur, Jackson. In order of certainty, it would be Jackson, Szczur, Baez. I think you can defend lining those guys up in any order.


Harry (Chatham, IL): Thoughts on Tony Zych?

Jim Callis: Really like him and thought he was a steal in fourth round. He could move quick, especially if he maintains a consistent slider to go with his plus-plus fastball velocity. He'll make the Top 30. The Cubs' relief prospects, if you include guys who probably move to the bullpen in the future, jump out more than their starting prospects.


Ben Badler's Imposter (NC): This is an outrage, Jim! How did Candelario miss out? Just look at that plate discipline.

Jim Callis: I know this is tongue in cheek, but I'll submit that BB totals in the Dominican Summer League don't tell you a lot about plate discipline. Pitchers can't exactly subtly pitch around hitters—they usually miss the zone by a wide margin.


Michael Stern (Rochester NY): I know Bryan Lahair is old for a prospect - but he did have a monster year last season, and did play extremely well for the Cubs when they brought him up in September. Do you foresee any scenario where the Cubs forego the free agent market and just give Lahair a shot to take the 1B job next season. I think given a chance he could run with it. He just might be one of those late bloomers who needs a chance a la Nelson Cruz. What are you hearing?

Jim Callis: LaHair has played enough in the majors that he didn't qualify for the list. He tore up Triple-A but it also was his sixth year in Triple-A. I don't think the Cubs will have LaHair as Plan A, but if 2012 is a total rebuilding year (which it should be), I think he'll get a chance to earn some playing time. The odds that he's another Cruz are pretty long though.


Davey (Willmette): Any chance Shawon Dunston Jr. is as good as his bonus would indicate, or was this a pure nepotism pick? Thanks.

Jim Callis: Not a nepotism pick, as Sr. doesn't work for the team and you would pay his son $1.275 million just because the dad was a former No. 1 overall pick by the Cubs. Our reports on Dunston weren't as good as what the Cubs saw in him. He had a down spring, but they see an athletic center fielder who will hit.


Barry (Atlanta GA): Did SS Marco Hernandez come close?

Jim Callis: He wasn't one of the 15 or so players I considered for the Top 10, but he is in the next group after them. I'd just like to see him play higher than Rookie ball before I go crazy on him. He's a promising hitter with the tools to stay at shortstop. We'll know a lot more once he plays in Class A in 2012.


@Jaypers413 (IL): Now that Bud Selig has stepped in, what kind of compensation are the Red Sox likely to receive in exchange for Theo?

Jim Callis: I tackled this in last week's Ask BA, and still think it ultimately will come down to Selig not wanting to place premium value on executives. Not sure if Boston will get one or two players, but I don't believe it will be a frontline prospect. If I were the Red Sox, I'd target guys like catcher Steve Clevenger and lefty reliever Jeff Beliveau.


Mike (Chicago): With a new emphasis on the farm system, do you think the cubs will still scout the Pacific Rim still, also have they signed anybody recently from the Pacific Rim that has promise since the players they have signed have had mixed results?

Jim Callis: I believe the Cubs will remain active all over the globe. They're pleased with several international prospects, including Pacific Rim signees such as righthander Dae-Eun Rhee and outfielders Jae-Hoon Ha and Pin-Chieh Chen.


Warren (Texas): How does Dae-Eun Rhee profile as a prospect after 2011? I thought he might be in the Top 10, and was a little surprised he wasn't. Approximately where did he fall in the Cubs Top 30? Thanks for the chat.

Jim Callis: He was a Top 10 candidate who just missed. His stuff really bounced back by the end of 2011, looks like he has put the Tommy John surgery fully behind him and has a chance to be a No. 3 starter.


Michael (Chicago): I heard about the new draft rules that may be coming and do you think that will hurt what Epstein wants to do since Boston spent a lot of money when he was in charge?

Jim Callis: We'll see what the new CBA brings with the draft. It may restrict draft spending in some manner, but I believe teams still can find ways to be aggressive and that Epstein and Co. will do exactly that. Owner Tom Ricketts is fully on board.


Michael Stern (Rochester NY): What are you hearing about Ryan Flaherty? He was on his way to a .300, 25 HR, 100 RBI season at AA till he got promoted - but then didn't fare so well in the PCL. Is he on the radar at all as a prospect? Any future for him down the line as a major league 2B? Thanks for the chat!

Jim Callis: He is, though he's also tough to peg. He was a Top 10 candidate who just missed. I like his lefthanded power, but he has no chance to play the middle infield and may be no more than adequate at third base. He needs to get a lot of time at third to see what he can become, but Vitters and LeMahieu need reps there to. Flaherty probably winds up being a corner utility guy.


Ben (Leland Grove): How many of the top 10 do you anticipate will make the top 100?

Jim Callis: Jackson, Baez, Szczur. That might be it.


Ty (Midwest): From 1 to 10, how concerned are you at Baez's demeanor?

Jim Callis: Maybe a 3. He's immature at times, but what 18-year-old isn't? I haven't heard anything to indicate he's a bad person or has a red flag that will prevent him from reaching his potential.


Michael Stern (Rochester NY): What made Jackson the # 1 over Baez? If Baez has the highest ceiling and Jackson's tools across the board are more around major league average - wouldn't it seem that Baez should be ranked higher? Is it just that he hasn't played, and Jackson has a couple of seasons under his belt?

Jim Callis: Jackson is a potential 20-20 center field with average or better tools across the board, and he's nearly big league ready. He's going to be more than just an average big leaguer. Baez has higher upside but a longer ways to get there. You can argue for either guy. We don't hold lack of pro experience against anyone—our lists are based solely on long-term major league value, factoring in ceiling and likelihood of reaching it.


Jon (Peoria): What is it that separates Dolis from Carpenter?

Jim Callis: More consistent fastball velocity, significantly better slider, more success in 2011.


Harry Pavlidis (Chicago, IL): Chris Rusin — how does he project? I get the nagging feeling that he's becoming a nibbler since his stuff isn't all that great. Does he have the command to pull that off?

Jim Callis: He has some of the best command in the system and is the Cubs' best lefty starting prospect, but his lack of overpowering stuff makes him a back-of-the-rotation guy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on November 15, 2011, 02:07:31 pm
Jim Callis chat- Part 2:

JD (AZ): Jim, will Pin-Chieh Chen figure into the Cubs top 30 and does he have a big enough bat to man a corner OF spot?

Jim Callis: Right now, he's in my just-missed group. The Cubs have a middle-of-the-pack farm system, but if we went 50 deep, they'd have one of the best 31-50 groups in the game. Chen is a slappy hitter without a lot of physical strength or projection, so he's going to have to stick in center to make it.


Don (Rosemont, IL): I know that he's not eligible for this list anymore, but if you had the choice, would Andrew Cashner be a starter or reliever?

Jim Callis: I'd give him every chance to be a starter. If he can't cut it, he's the closer of the future.


Jesse (IL): Jim, question about Daniel Lockhart, Keith's son and their 10th round draft pick. The Cubs liked him enough to give him a sizeable bonus, is he a sleeper type we should keep an eye on?

Jim Callis: Yes, he's a sleeper. Lefthanded-hitting infielder who makes good contact and has some athleticism. Maybe a second baseman in the long run.


Grant (Chicago): Are Lake's AFL numbers an aberration, or a predictor of things to come next year?

Jim Callis: I don't believe much in AFL stats for a variety of reasons . . . the parks favor hitters, teams usually don't send many top pitchers to Arizona, relatively small sample size, etc. Lake always has had big tools and played well in high Class A this year before tailing off in Double-A. I'd be more impressed if he had handled Double-A than I am by his AFL performance.


Dan (Boise): Would you rather have Baez or Lindor as your future infielder?

Jim Callis: It depends on what you want. If you want a slick-fielding shortstop with a solid bat for the position, that's Lindor. If you want a third baseman with a potential elite bat, that's Baez. Both are hard to find. To answer your question, I'd say Lindor just barely. Really on the fence on that one. If I thought Baez would stay at shortstop for sure, it would be him. He has a chance but most scouts think he'll move.


Bob (Mundelein, IL): Is Hayden Simpson worthy of being in the top 30 after the year he had?

Jim Callis: He's going to make the Top 30 because I think he has to get a mulligan for 2011, when he pitched with a stress reaction and a small tear in his elbow, both of which have healed. I'd describe him as another draftee that the Cubs were higher on than the majority of clubs. Really don't know what to make of him until we see a fully healthy Simpson in pro ball.


Randy (Naperville, IL): Is Ben Wells on your radar? What type of a prospect is he?

Jim Callis: He is and will make the Top 30. He's a potential mid-rotation starter with a heavy fastball, though as a 2010 Arkansas high school draftee, he's a few years away.


Shane (Miami): Jim - You have been espcially high on Szczur, where some others in the industry have not. In the summer you indicated in a weekly chat, that Szczur's upside was similar to Ellsbury (possibly at the time not expecting him to hit 30+ Hr). Is his ceiling something less of Ellsbury's power display of this year, but similar speed, bat and other intangibles?

Jim Callis: Yes. I could see Szczur being Ellsbury without the 30 HR power. Szczur has a chance to be a plus hitter/SB threat/center fielder with maybe average power and great makeup. Sign me up.


Matt (Chicago): I noticed that LeMahieu was left off the list. Do you think he has a viable shot at profiling as an everyday 2B or 3B?

Jim Callis: Another guy who just missed. He's the best pure hitter in the system but has yet to show the power to profile as a good regular at third base, where he's an average defender. He's not quick enough to be a big league second baseman. It all comes down to developing power for LeMahieu.


Tim (Toronto): Kevin Rhoderick had a solid 1st pro season. If he can keep the walks down, does he have the upside of an 8th inning setup guy?

Jim Callis: That's him. Interesting fastball and slider, needs to throw enough strikes.


Brent (Chicago): I know that we can't read too much into the 2015 line-up, but why Zeke Devoss at 2B over Junior Lake? Is there any way that Lake mans SS and moves Castro to 2B?

Jim Callis: Lake is already big at 6-foot-3 and 215 pounds, and my thinking was he'll be too big and not quick enough for the middle infield in the long run. I don't really see him as a big league shortstop.


Joe R. (Newport News, VA): Forgive my pessimism. Can you compare Javier Baez to how Lou Montanez was perceived when Montanez was drafted?

Jim Callis: That's a name from the past (who has returned to the Cubs system, too)! Here's our report on Montanez from the 2000 Draft Preview: He hasn't received the recognition Gulliver Prep's David Espinosa has, but Montanez still ranks among the top 15 players because of the shortage of quality shortstops. While he lacks Espinosa's speed and athletic ability, scouts regard Martinez as the better pure shortstop and have compared him to Blue Jays shortstop Alex Gonzalez. He has excellent hands, glides effortlessly to balls and has a smooth, easy release. If his lack of speed eventually pushes him to third base, he has the bat to pull off the switch. The ball jumps off his bat and he projects 25-30 home runs a year. Like Espinosa, he has committed to Miami. Sounds like Montanez was considered a more likely shortstop (though he didn't stay there) with a promising bat, but scouts are more excited about Baez' bat than they were about Montanez'.


Jon (Peoria): How does Jae-Hoon Ha compare with Jackson and Sczcur among CF prospects?

Jim Callis: Right now, he's the best defender of the three but lacks their offensive upside. Jackson has more power and basestealing savvy, while Szczur is a better pure hitter and has more speed.


BJP (Tulsa, OK - Tulsa (TUL)): What's the outlook for Dallas Beeler? Was he close to top 10?

Jim Callis: I like Beeler. He's maybe the best prospect in the system who has gotten almost no hype, and I considered him for the Top 10. If everything works out, he could be a No. 3 starter with a solid sinker/curve/changeup combo.


Karl of Delaware (Georgetown, Delaware): The Cubs traded for two prospects previously ranked in BA's top thirty lists: Abner Abreau (Indians) and Michael Burgess (Nationals). Do either make the Cubs top 30 this year?

Jim Callis: Nope. Both have some power but don't do enough else to make it. Burgess is better than Abreu.


Dan (lansing): is Dustin Gieger a 11-20 guy?

Jim Callis: Not yet, as he's still raw, but he does have interesting upside with his power and third-base defense. He's not on the Top 30 yet but I could see him making it next year.


Dan (Lansing): Just curious as to where you think Lee and Archer would have ranked if they were still with the organization?

Jim Callis: Lee would have been near the top of the list, probably No. 3 between Baez and Szczur. Archer had a rough year, but so did all of the Cubs pitching prospects and I would have still kept him ahead of McNutt, who's No. 4.


Jon (Peoria): How would you classify Jay Jackson's prospect status after the rough season he had in the PCL?

Jim Callis: Let me put it this way: He's not on the Top 30.


Jon (Peoria): I contend that Vitters will benefit the most from a regime change that will put more emphasis on pitch selection and won't allow him to swing at anything he can reach. Agree?

Jim Callis: Not really. I don't think one regime can make a player more selective than another. I think plate discipline is more innate than a lot of fans realize.


Bob (Mundelein, IL): As a follow-up to your response to my question about Simpson earlier, when did the Cubs find out that he had issues with his elbow? It seems like they should have shut him down when he struggled in the MWL and didn't show nearly the same stuff he had in college. Is this expected to just be a minor issue?

Jim Callis: Not until after the year. They say the elbow is fine now and he should be healthy in 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 15, 2011, 02:52:46 pm
Quote
Bob (Mundelein, IL): Is Hayden Simpson worthy of being in the top 30 after the year he had?

Jim Callis: He's going to make the Top 30 because I think he has to get a mulligan for 2011, when he pitched with a stress reaction and a small tear in his elbow, both of which have healed. I'd describe him as another draftee that the Cubs were higher on than the majority of clubs. Really don't know what to make of him until we see a fully healthy Simpson in pro ball....

Bob (Mundelein, IL): As a follow-up to your response to my question about Simpson earlier, when did the Cubs find out that he had issues with his elbow? It seems like they should have shut him down when he struggled in the MWL and didn't show nearly the same stuff he had in college. Is this expected to just be a minor issue?

Jim Callis: Not until after the year. They say the elbow is fine now and he should be healthy in 2012.


Very interesting.  That might explain a lot of things, and provides some hope that he'll bounce back.  The prospect that a healthy young man would take 16 months to bounce back from mono always seemed a little dubious to me.  This makes a lot more sense. 


Puzzling that his dramatic lost of velocity wouldn't have gotten more medical attention during the season, though.  If blaming it all on mono seemed iffy to me, shouldn't that have crossed fleita's mind, too?  If he had a stress reaction and a small tear, would that explain losing 10 mph? 


Will be interesting to see whether, after two summers not pitching healthy, whether at this point in his life how much of the arm and the mechanics that he had pre-draft.   Pitching weak, pitching with a bad elbow, and pitching so completely badly, that could prompt a million failed efforts to tinker with the mechanics, and perhaps by now he'll have no good-mechanics muscle-memory at all, much less any control or any confidence. 


But it sure would be awesome if he did bounce back, healthy, and emerged as a good prospect.  We could use a break like that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 15, 2011, 03:38:14 pm
Warren (Texas): How does Dae-Eun Rhee profile as a prospect after 2011? I thought he might be in the Top 10, and was a little surprised he wasn't. Approximately where did he fall in the Cubs Top 30? Thanks for the chat.

Jim Callis: He was a Top 10 candidate who just missed. His stuff really bounced back by the end of 2011, looks like he has put the Tommy John surgery fully behind him and has a chance to be a No. 3 starter.

They must have missed Jeff's memo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 15, 2011, 04:46:10 pm
Vitters: 3-5, RBI, SB

LeMahieu: 2-4, RBI, BB

Cashner: 2/3 -4-5-5-1-1

Carpenter: 1-3-1-1-0-1


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_15_msswin_perwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on November 15, 2011, 07:04:25 pm
Trade the Red Sox Carpenter.  He's nothing special.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on November 15, 2011, 07:24:09 pm
Am I nuts, or is Vitters having a very good AFL?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on November 15, 2011, 07:34:12 pm
Are those mutually exclusive?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 15, 2011, 08:04:59 pm
Rare form.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 15, 2011, 08:10:52 pm
Am I nuts, or is Vitters having a very good AFL?

I guess that depends.  Is .341 BA, 88 AB, 4 HR, 16 RBI, 4 BB, 9 SO, .368 OBA, .545 SLG, .913 OPS a very good AFL?

He's been playing OF and DH, I think.  Maybe not having the pressure of playing 3B has helped him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on November 15, 2011, 09:43:18 pm
4 BB in 88 AB isn't so good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 15, 2011, 10:56:44 pm
It is for Vitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on November 15, 2011, 10:59:38 pm
It is for Vitters.

Nice.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on November 16, 2011, 12:13:21 am
Like a bad rat hat, that's not good for anybody. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 16, 2011, 07:35:22 am
But his BB/SO rate is good.   :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 16, 2011, 04:37:56 pm
Vitters: 1-4, K

Lake: 0-3, BB, 2 K

LeMahieu: 2-4, SB

Beliveau: 2-1-0-0-0-2


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_16_msswin_surwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 17, 2011, 04:46:48 pm
Lake: 2-3, 2B, 2 RBI

Vitters: 2-3

LeMahieu: 0-3, 2 K


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2011_11_17_scowin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 17, 2011, 09:12:53 pm
The top 25 prospects in the AFL this year according to onlooking scouts.

A grand total of 1 Cub made the list: Junior Lake at 23


http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111117&content_id=25995966&vkey=affililiate&c_id=
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 17, 2011, 09:17:11 pm
Final AFL stats for Mesa.

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_ibp&sid=l119&cid=555&y=2011

Pretty successful outings for Vitters, Lake, LeMahieu, Carpenter and Beliveau. Not so much for Cashner, McNutt or Hatley.

Vitters, in fact, will finish right around 5th in the batting race.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 18, 2011, 07:44:42 pm
In order to encourage discussion in the absence of box scores, I have gathered together information on Cub minor leaguers from various sources.  My top 10 are listed below.

How would you rank RH starters in our organization?

Key:
05-01: 5th ranked overall, 1st ranked right handed starting pitcher. 


-------------------------RIGHTHANDED STARTING PITCHERS-----------------------------
05-01: RHSP Trey McNutt 6'4" 220 lb (198908)[2009-32, Shelton St. CC] {58:0.79}
65/39 K/W in 95 SL IP (120H! and 5 HR). Solid FB.  Best curveball in system (BA2012)   
[2011 Cubs BA03, BP02; 2012 Cubs BA04]  Hopefully, injuries were cause of his poor showing in 2011.

13-02: RHSP Dae-Eun Rhee 6'2" 190 Lbs (198903) [2007-KO] {35:1.07}
Repeated FSL with much improved K/W. Best changeup in system (BA2012)
117/43 K/W in 127.2 FSL IP (131 H and 10 HR allowed) [2011 Cubs BA30] 
   
14-03: RHSP Ben Wells 6'3" 220 Lbs (199209) [2010-07, Ark HS] {41:0.99} NWL#12
53/19 K/W in 77 NWL IP. 83 H allowed.
Solid sinker (92-94 MPH FB with knee-buckling slider and developing split-finger)   
[2011 Cubs BA24, BP16] 
     
15-04: RHSP Dillon Maples 6'3" 195 Lbs (199205) [2011-14] $2.5M bonus.
BA_2011_draft_#46prospect. FB sites at 91-94 with good curve but below-avg
command [2012 Cubs BA05]

19-05: RHSP Robert Whitenack 6'5" 185 Lbs (198811) [2009-08, SUNY Old Westbury] {02-2.31}
Dominated in FSL.  22/13 K/W in 37 AA IP before blew out arm (TJS)   
       
28-06: RHSP Yao-Lin Wang 6'0" 180 lbs (199102) [2009-Taiwan] {22:1.31} NWL#21-30
77/20 K/W in 67 NWL IP (64 Hits 7 HR allowed).
Straight FB (peaks in mid90's but usu. throws 87-91) and good curve.   

29-07: RHSP Dallas Beeler 6'5" 205 lbs (198906) [2010-41, Oral Roberts] {20:1.37}
Split time between Peoria and Tenn.  Impressive K/W ratio (68/13).
Gave up 35(68) H in 43(51) Peoria/Tenn IP. Best control in system (BA2012)

36-08: RHSP Jay Jackson 6'1" 195 Lbs (198710) [2008-09, Furman] {32:1.16]
97/46 K/W in 146.2 PCL IP (180H&10HR). In 2010, 119/48 K/W in 157.1 PCL IP (153H&20HR)
[2011 Cubs BA15, BP09] 

38-09: RHSP Nick Struck 5'11" 185 Lbs (198910) [2009-39, Mount Hood(Ore) CC] {17:1.59}
Impressive 44/4 K/W between FSL, SL, and PCL. However, doesn't miss
too many bats (H/IP > 1 at each level). Low 90's FB.  Diminutive. 

47-10: RHSP Matt Loosen 6'2" 205 lbs (198904) [2010-23, Jacksonville College] {45:0.92}
Aggressively promoted from MWL--> FSL--> SL.  67/19 K/W in MWL/FSL.  7/8 K/W in SL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 18, 2011, 07:48:45 pm
Hmmm, no Zych again.  And where is Homer Simpson?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 19, 2011, 07:08:22 pm
Righthanded Starting Pitchers Continued:

62-11: RHSP Hayden Simpson 6'0" 170 Lbs (198905) [2010-01, Southern Ark] {143:-1.32}
Pitched (poorly) thru elbow injury. Supposedly healthy.
 11/11 K/W in AZL.  8.15 ERA.  [2011 BA08, BP07]

63-12: RHSP Alberto Cabrera 6'4" 210 Lb (198810) [DO] {68:0.64}
101/74 K/W in 137.1 IP between SL (48.2IP) & PCL(88.2IP). 178H &15HR allowed!
[2011 BA20, BP11]

67-13: RHSP Alexander Santana 6'2" 170 lb (199310) [DR] 87-91 mph FB with above-
avg sink and a good curve ball for his age.
(0.857 WHIP in 35 DSL IP as 17-yr old).

71-14: RHSP Brett Wallach 6'5" 205 Lb (198812) [2009-03(Dodgers), Orange Co CC] {78:0.33}
{78:0.33} [2011 BA17]   
71/34 K/W in 91 FSL IP (106H and 6 HR). Demoted. 25/23 K/W in 26 MWL IP (29H&0HR) 
   
93-15: RHSP Jose Arias 6'5" 220 Lbs (199101) [DO]
50/8 K/W in 43.1 DSL IP (31H&2HR allowed).
94 MPH FB & solid breaking ball.

109-16: RHSP Austin Reed 6'3" 200 Lbs (199110) [2010-12] {120:-0.42}
36/25 K/W in 63.2 NWL IP (82H&5HR)
ArizPhil: Pitched well in instructionals (Fall 2011)   
 
136-17: RHSP Starlin Peralta 6'4" 180 Lbs (199011) [DO] {98:0.02}
18/2 K/W in 13 AZL IP (14H&0HR). 40/26 K/W in 47 MWL IP (67H&9HR).   

142-18: miFA RHSP Austin Bibens-Dirkx 6'2" 190 Lbs (198504) [2006-16(Mariners)] {118:-0.39}
75/31 K/W in 105.1 PCL IP (125H&18HR allowed)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 20, 2011, 08:30:31 am
BA's top ten prospects, best tools, 2015 projected lineup, top prospects of the decade (Bobby Brownlie?), top draft picks of the decade (and where they are today).

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2012/2612580.html (http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2012/2612580.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 20, 2011, 09:32:07 am
On a similar prospects of the past theme, Matt Murton is listed as one of the top 50 free agents this winter (Keith Law, ESPN).

I haven't checked out the details, but it looks like MLB is instituting a cap on the total spending each team can make on drafted players. 
Will this lessen the incentive to lose games in September to get the number 1 draft choice? 
Will this send players such as Szczur to the NFL?
Will it lead to an increase in international spending?
Can this work without allowing teams to trade draft choices?   

Thoughts?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on November 20, 2011, 09:34:58 am
Thanks, Cactus. Good stuff.

One thing stand out. All of Wilkins' top draft choices are still in the Cubs organization. None of the last guy's are.

Also, no way will Marmol or Soto be Cubs in 2015.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 20, 2011, 11:54:20 am
it looks like MLB is instituting a cap on the total spending each team can make on drafted players. 
Will this lessen the incentive to lose games in September to get the number 1 draft choice?

I can't recall ever seeing this happen.


Will this send players such as Szczur to the NFL?

This question amounts to asking if human beings (which include young athletes) will make decisions in what they consider to be their best interest, and whether the amount of money they will get might be considered a factor in determining their best interest..... does this really need to be asked?  But it will make the question well before they are drafted after their 3rd or 4th college season.  It will also make a difference for two-sport HS stars deciding whether to pursue college football or college baseball.


Will it lead to an increase in international spending?

It will by teams with any sense.


Can this work without allowing teams to trade draft choices?

Much depends on how you define "work."  The interest of MLB is to reduce what it costs them to sign prospects, and the interest of the MLBPA is to get more money for their members, which is easier if the teams are making more money.  Such a limitation would pretty clearly hold down what teams spend in the draft, and to that extent it would "work."  Other "goals" that are offered are PR crap, so it is senseless to try to determine whether a limit would "work" to achieve those goals -- neither the owners or the MLBPA care about them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 20, 2011, 11:54:44 am

I haven't checked out the details, but it looks like MLB is instituting a cap on the total spending each team can make on drafted players. 

I think the most likely effect would be that teams would sign fewer draft choices, concentrating on the sure fire studs, and then sign a whole bunch lesser prospects as free agents.

I would rather have one 3 million dollar prospect than 30 One hundred thousand dollar prospects.  Especially since you can probably sign most of them anyway in the free agent market afterwards.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 20, 2011, 06:15:09 pm
-----------RIGHTHANDED RELIEF PITCHERS---------------------------------
09-01: RHSwing Aaron Kurcz 6'0" 175 Lbs (199008) [2010-10; S Nevada JC] {11:1.84}  92-94 MPH heat.   
49/12 K/W in 36.1 SL IP as reliever (0.169 BAA). 42/22 K/W in 46 IP as starter (0.262 BAA).
[2011 Cubs BA25] 

10-02: RHRP Rafael Dolis 6'4" 215 Lb (198801) [2004-DO] {62:0.72} 2011 SL allstar
48/35 K/W in 72.2 SL IP (61H and 2 HR allowed). Control so-so but BAA good.
Hardest thrower in system. [2011 Cubs BA09, 2012 Cubs BA07, 2011 BP15] Did not allow run in 17 straight games

17-03: RHRP Chris Carpenter 6'4" 220 Lbs (198512) [2008-03, Ohio HS] {112:-0.22}   
28/23 K/W in 30.1 AAA IP (32 H & 3 HR allowed).
Struggled with control during miserable 2011 season. Still brings the gas ...
[2011 Cubs BA06, BP06] 

31-04: RHRP Tony Zych 6'3" 188 Lbs (199008) [2011-04, Louisville]
Works at 94-97.  Also has slider.  Pitched on US National Team in summer 2009.
Named Cape Cod League's top relief prospect in 2010.

40-05: RHRP Larry Suarez: 6'4" 245 Lbs (198912) (2006-VZ) {36:1.05} 
Split 2011 between MWL (16IP), FSL(12IP), and SL(16IP).  K/9IP dropped
from 13/9/6 between the levels while WHIP increased from 1.1 to 1.3 to 1.7.     
   
42-06: RHSwing Ryan Searle 6'0" 190 Lbs (198906) [2007-Australia] {22:1.33}
27/14 K/W in 28 FSL IP as RP (18H & 2HR) followed by 66/43 K/W in 84.2 SL IP (81H & 4HR).   
   
44-07: RHRP Kevin Rhoderick 6'1" 190 Lbs (198808) Oregon State [2010-09] {14:1.71}
58/37 K/W in 57 AA IP (38 Hits allowed). Shaky control.
Best slider in system (BA2012)
             
57-08: RHRP Blake Parker 6'3" 225 Lbs (198506) [2006-16, Arkansas] {46:0.91} (BA-20)
60/27 K/W in 51 PCL IP (37H & 5 HR allowed). So-so control but low BAA.
 
58-09: miFA RHSwing Robert Coello 6'5" 250 Lb (198411) [2004-20(Reds), FL HS] {71:0.56}
94/41 K/W in 95 PCL IP (85H & 11 HR allowed)
0.149 (0.288) BAA and 1.01 (6.52) ERA as reliever (starter) in 35(59) IP.   

59-10: RHSwing Jose Rosario 6'1" 170 Lbs (199008) [2008-FA] {61:0.74}
92-94 MPH FB in NWL.  Working on curveball.   
50/18 K/W in 63.2 NWL IP (67H & 1 HR allowed)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 20, 2011, 09:22:58 pm
dallen, the first four digits of each entry, such as the "42-06" before Ryan Searle's name.... what do they represent?  What to they mean?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on November 20, 2011, 09:24:51 pm
42 is his rating in the overall system.  6 his rating at his position.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 20, 2011, 11:37:24 pm
Here is my first try at the list.  I am sure I have left some people off of it.


1   Jackson
2   Baez
3   Szcur
4   Maples
5   Vogelbach
6   Vitters
7   McNutt
8   Candelario
9   Zych
10   Ha
11   Lake
12   Zapata
13   Amaya
14   Dunston
15   Dolis
16   Flaherty
17   LaMehieu
18   Carpenter
19   Beliveau
20   Burke
21   Kirk
22   Kurcz
23   Clevenger
24   Hernandez
25   Castillo
26   Easterling
27   Mulave
28   Wells
29   Scott
30   Simpson
31   Golden
32   Rhoderick
33   Silva
34   Geiger
35   Whitenack
36   Watkins
37   Harman
38   Del Valle
39   Hoilman
40   Penalver
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 21, 2011, 01:45:52 am
davep, I have little doubt that you're more knowlegable about the farm system than I am, but my first impression of your list is that you've seriously underrated our catching prospects. BA  ranked Wellington Castillo sixth on their list, and the Cubs invested first-round money ($1.5 million) in Marck Mulave.

I was glad to see that you agreed with me and others that Candelario belongs in the top ten and that Ha is close. I suspect Rhee is among those prospects you omitted that belongs on your list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 21, 2011, 11:19:55 am
Cubsin - you are probably right.  I had no idea where to rate Muave, since he was a 16 year old that played only a couple of games, and that in the instructional league.  I am also rather high on Clevenger, although try as I might, I couldn't really be comfortable moving him up.

Castillo is a different situation.  I was quite surprised to see him rated as high as he was in BA.  To me, he is a Henry Blanco who will never make enough contact to be a regular in the majors.  I hope I am wrong.

The bottom 25 are also quite arbtiraty.  In most years, I barely managed to find 20 prospects that I considered worth following or rating.  This year I had trouble limiting it to 40.  Wellington Cruz was not on the list, along with several interesting DR prospects.

And I always have trouble deciding to rank prospects like Dunston, who has had no pro experience and has nothing but scouting reports about potential to use.  I left off Gretzky, who was given a substantial bonus by the team.

Another obvious one is Lake.  Should he be in the top 5, because of his tools, or in the middle 20s because of his track record?  Spring training should be interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 21, 2011, 08:02:30 pm

Davep: Thanks for the rankings.  Hopefully, our recent signings will live up to your expectations! My list is a lot different.  Hopefully, that is a sign of the depth of our system.  I believe you have Silva and Easterling quite a bit higher than me.  I hope I have Easterling too low.  He needs to move quickly due to his age, but he showed signs that he might do that last year.

Righthanded pitchers who pitched mostly in relief last year (continued) plus A. J. Morris



 60-11: RHRP Tayler Scott 6'3" 165 Lbs (199206) [2011-05, AZ HS] (89-93 MPH FB and slow curve)
South African BB&soccer prodigy who moved to US to work with Tom House
$280 K bonus.

64-12: RHRP Robinson Lopez 6'2" 190 Lbs (199103) [DO(Braves), Trade ] {130:-0.66} Hard thrower
In 2010 as Brave, 70/43 K/W in 92.2 lowA IP(84H&5HR).
[2011 BA19, BP10] In 2011 as Cub, 35/30 K/W in 69 MWL IP(78H&8HR).
 
66-13: RHRP Oswaldo Martinez 6'0" 180 Lbs (198809) [2006-MEX] {12:1.84}
18 dominant IP in FSL.  26/13 K/W in 34.2 SL IP (29H & 1 HR).     
   
74-14: RHRP Frank Batista 5'10" 170 lb (198904) [2009-DO] {37:1.05} 
46/20 K/W in 61 FSL IP (51H & 3 HR).  Selected to 2011 FSL post-season Allstar team
   
81-15: RHSwing Luis Liria 6'2" 170 Lbs (199001) [2007-DO] {60:0.74}
24/7 K/W in 25.1 NWL IP (16 H & 1 HR).  34/20 K/W in 45.1 MWL IP (only 31 H allowed but 5 HR)   
 
82-16: RHRP Kyle Smit 6'1" 190 Lbs (198710) [2006-05(Dodgers)] {109:-0.21}
37/23 K/W in 43.1 SL IP (54H&3HR). 7/8 K/W in 13 FSL IP. Also shelled in PCL(5
IP). [2011 BA20] 

84-17: RHRP Marcus Hatley 6'5" 220 Lb (198803) [2006-39] {67:0.65}   
60/30 K/W in 59.2 IP split between MWL(15.1), FSL(15.1), and SL (29.0)
49H&2HR allowed. BAA & K/IP suffered upon final promotion.  Shelled in AZ fall league.
   
89-18: RHRP Jin-Young Kim 6'1" 190 Lbs (199204) [2010, Korea, $850K] {110:-0.22}
16/15 K/W in 24.2 NWL IP (38H&4HR). Demoted. 15/3 K/W in 20.2 AZL IP (25H&1 HR).
Sits 87-89 mph, touching 91.  Has curveball & slider). 

92-19: RHSwing Michael Jensen 6'1" 185 Lbs (199012) [2011-26, Hartnell(CA) JC]
FB tops out at 94 MPH; has hard slider.  A sleeper perhaps?

94-20: RHSwing AJ Morris 6'2" 185 Lbs (198612) [2009-04 (Nats for Gorz), KSU]
61/27 K/W in 72 high-A IP (67H & 4HR) in 2010.  Missed 2011 with shoulder injury
[2011 BA18(Nats)].

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 21, 2011, 08:41:17 pm
Dallen - I have been unable to follow your lists, partly because I have not understood your rating system until your above post, partly because you have done it by position rather than just a simple listing, and partly because I can not find some of the earlier portions of the list.

Is there a way we can get the complete list at one time?  Making a word or excel document or something similar would be helpful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 22, 2011, 07:52:51 am
Want to know one of the many reasons why the Cubs are awful?

So far, 375 players have reached the big leagues after signing out of the 2005-07 drafts. That works out to an average of 12.5 team, with totals ranging from the Cardinals (24) on the high end to the Astros (four on the low end). Here's how many major leaguers each club signed, along with their most productive player to date:

Team No. Most Productive Big Leaguer
Cardinals 24 Colby Rasmus (No. 28, 2005)
Padres 22 Chase Headley (2nd round, 2005)
Marlins 21 Mike Stanton (2nd round, 2007)
Tigers 18 Matt Joyce (12th round, 2005)
Diamondbacks 17 Justin Upton (No. 1, 2005)
Reds 17 Jay Bruce (No. 12, 2005)
Yankees 17 Brett Gardner (3rd round, 2005)
Giants 14 Tim Lincecum (No. 10, 2006)
Rangers 14 Tommy Hunter (supp. 1st round, 2007)
Red Sox 14 Jacoby Ellsbury (No. 23, 2005)
Brewers 13 Ryan Braun (No. 5, 2005)
Mets 13 Mike Pelfrey (No. 9, 2005)
Twins 13 Matt Garza (No. 25, 2005)
Angels 12 Peter Bourjos (10th round, 2005)
Athletics 12 Trevor Cahill (2nd round, 2006)
Orioles 12 Matt Wieters (No. 5, 2007)
Blue Jays 11 Ricky Romero (No. 6, 2005)
Braves 11 Yunel Escobar (2nd round, 2005)
Mariners 11 Doug Fister (7th round, 2006)
Phillies 11 Josh Outman (10th round, 2005)
Indians 10 Josh Tomlin (19th round, 2006)
Nationals 10 Ryan Zimmerman (No. 4, 2005)
White Sox 10 Clayton Richard (8th round, 2005)
Pirates 9 Andrew McCutchen (No. 11, 2005)
Cubs 8 Darwin Barney (4th round, 2007)
Royals 8 Alex Gordon (No. 2, 2005)
Rays 7 Evan Longoria (No. 3, 2006)
Dodgers 6 Clayton Kershaw (No. 6, 2006)
Rockies 6 Troy Tulowitzki (No. 7, 2005)
Astros 4 Bud Norris (6th round, 2006)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 22, 2011, 08:01:07 am
Want to know one of the many reasons why the Cubs are awful?

Not only are we among the teams at the bottom, but for the teams at the bottom other than the Astros, look at who their best drafted player is compared to ours.
 
Pirates 9 Andrew McCutchen (No. 11, 2005)
Cubs 8 Darwin Barney (4th round, 2007)
Royals 8 Alex Gordon (No. 2, 2005)
Rays 7 Evan Longoria (No. 3, 2006)
Dodgers 6 Clayton Kershaw (No. 6, 2006)
Rockies 6 Troy Tulowitzki (No. 7, 2005)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 22, 2011, 08:07:30 am
Even the Astros' best guy is better than ours.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 22, 2011, 08:27:19 am
I believe that was Stockstill's last draft for the Cubs.  So it's not surprising that they are near the bottom.  Hopefully later drafts will have the Cubs doing progressively better.  Particularly looking forward.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 22, 2011, 08:52:24 am
No, Ron.  Wilken was in charge for the 2006 and 2007 drafts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 22, 2011, 09:57:37 am
I suspect the figures be much better if you computed it for the 2006 - 2008 draft?  And since Wilken had no second, third or fourth choice in 2006, I suspect that the draft numbers would look even better for the years 2007 - 2009.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 22, 2011, 10:05:44 am
2008 - Cashner, Carpenter, Harrison (Pirates), Campana, Coleman.

2009 - LeMahieu
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 22, 2011, 10:14:33 am
No, Ron.  Wilken was in charge for the 2006 and 2007 drafts.

My mistake - I didn't look closely enough and thought the list was from the 2005 draft.  Thanks for the correction.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on November 22, 2011, 02:56:29 pm
Thanks Jeff...not good and not altogether surprising....just one of many areas in which prior Cub leadership was grossly inadequate.

Development of relatively deficient players has almost certainly been another.

Team Theo won't fix the problems overnight - and they may not be able to fix them in 5 years - but there is NO question in my mind, but that they represent a TREMENDOUS improvement over the guys who preceded them.   The previous guys were, simply, duds in terms of the results they obtained (particularly given the amount they spent to obtain so little)!

Looking at how little Cubs accomplished in the last 7-8 years, as well as the current state of the franchise's talent pool makes clear how over his head Jim Hendry really was.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 22, 2011, 03:15:45 pm
I suspect the figures be much better if you computed it for the 2006 - 2008 draft?  And since Wilken had no second, third or fourth choice in 2006, I suspect that the draft numbers would look even better for the years 2007 - 2009.

Yea, but those FA signings in the 2005-2006 off-season were essential to the Cubs being "competitive" and fielding a credible team the fans would buy tickets to see, instead of trying any rebuilding foolishness.  And after finishing 4th in 2005, the FA-enhanced Cubs slid to last in 2006.

I don't think any of us commented on it at the time, and I suspect that if many of us looked at it, most thought it was the right way to go.

So what did we get in exchange for three rounds of draft picks?

We got Bob Howrey for the 2nd round pick.  Scott Eyre for the 3rd round pick.  And Jacque Jones for the 4th round  pick.   Tempted as I am to call that one of the worst off-season of Hendry's tenure, when you look at the players who ended up taken by those comp picks, it really doesn't look as if the Cubs lost much, though it would have been hard to tell that would be the case several months before the draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on November 22, 2011, 06:55:44 pm
Well the Cubs won't be bringing in talent like last year.  The Draft will have heavy penalties for going over slot.  There will also be a limit of $2.9 million for foreign talent, like the draft their will be stiff penalities of going over.  Baseball America seemed to think a world draft was the goal of all of this.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 22, 2011, 07:12:05 pm
I'll post the entire list (one player per line) in a few weeks.  Here are the rest (well I did exclude a few) of the righthanded relievers.

More righthanded middle relievers.

98-21: miFA RHSwing Marco Carrillo 5'11" 215 Lbs (198702) [MX] {70:0.60}
62/32 K/W in 76.1 SL IP (61H&6HR allowed). 25/6 K/W in 31 PCL IP(38H&6HR)
   
102-22: RHRP Hung-Wen Chen 5'11" 210 Lbs (198603) [TW] {121:-0.44}
46/6 K/W in 34.2 MEX IP (28H & 1 HR). 22/12 K/W in 29 SL IP (34H&3 HR).
 
105-23: RHRP Yohan Gonzalez 6'4" 210 Lbs (199004) [DO] {123:-0.50}
56/29 K/W in 73.1 MWL IP (76H&8HR allowed).

108-24: RHRP Jordan Latham 6'1" 180 Lbs (198609) [2006-29] {122:-0.44}
57/42 K/W in 61.1 FSL IP (57H&5HR). Lots of walks and K's. 

108i-24i: RHRP Brian Schlitter 6'5" 235 Lbs (198512) [2007-16(Phils) College of Charleston]
Missed all of 2011 due to an elbow injury.
In 2010, 42/21 K/W in 45.2 PCL IP (44H&3HR) 7/5 K/W in 8 ML IP (18H&2HR allowed).

111-25: RHRP Eduardo Figueroa 6'1" 185 Lbs (198811) [2007, VE] {63:0.72}
56/23 K/W in 70.2 FSL IP (66 H & 4 HR allowed). ERA only 2.42.
   
113-26: RHRP Patrick Francescon 5'11" 185 Lbs (198901) (2011-40, Trevecca Nazarene)
{44:0.92} 1st 2011 draftee to reach Peoria 40/7 K/W in 34.2 IP.

115-27: RHRP Ty'Relle Harris 6'4" 235 Lb (198612) [2009-19] {72:0.54}
29/27 K/W in 34.1 SL IP (28H & 2 HR allowed)
Suffered serious leg injuries after being hit by car.  Future status unknown.   
   
116-28: RHRP Yilver Sanchez 6'2" 198 Lb (199007) {42:0.96} 
32/6 K/W in 26 AZL IP but allowed 36 hits
 
117-29: RHRP Bryce Shafer 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (198811) [2010-49, Valparaiso] {54:0.81}
35/11 K/W in 25.2 NWL IP (18 H and 0 HR); however, 24/15 K/W in 29 MWL IP (27H and 1 HR)

118-30: RHRP Ramon Garcia 6'2" 170 Lb (199108) {52b:0.84} 
25/7 K/W in 34.2 AZL IP (46 hits! and 1 HR)  but 17/3 K/W in 15.2 MWL IP (15 H & 0 HR) 

123-31: RHSwing James Pugliese 6'3" 195 Lbs (199208) [2011-18, NJ CC] (95:0.06}   
32/12 K/W in 39 AZL IP (47 H allowed)   
90-92 MPH FB with avg breaking ball.   

124-32: RHRP Juan Yasser-Serrano 5'10" 220 lb (198803) [2010-Cuba] {97-.03}
41/20 K/W in 56.1 FSL IP (55H & 6 HR)   
   
125-33: RHRP Roderick Pichardo 5'10" 180 Lb (199009) [DO] {74:0.51} 2008-early 2011 in DSL)
13/4 K/W in 13 AZL IP (10 H & 1 HR). 12/7 K/W in 16 MWL IP (16 H & 1 HR)   

129-34: RHRP Dustin Fitzgerald 6'4" 210 Lbs R/R (198906) [2010-19, TX JC] {85:0.24}
27/23 K/W in 31.0 NWL IP (26H & 1 HR).
       
130-35: RHRP Jean Sandoval 6'1" 190 Lbs (198807) [DO] {87:0.16}
26/6 K/W in 24 NWL IP (15 H&1HR allowed).  21/7 K/W in 27.0 AZL IP (26H&3HR)
   
131-36: RHRP Pete Levitt 6'5" 235 lb (198904) [2011-32, Mt. Olive] {89:0.13}
21/5 K/W in 27.2 MWL IP.   
     
135-37: RHRP Colin Richardson 6'1" 180 Lb (199108) [2010-14, FL HS] {90:0.13}
25/12 K/W in 30 NWL IP (36 H allowed)

137-38: RHRP Alvido Jimenez 6'1" 160 Lb (199111) {92:0.07}
22/13 K/W in 36 AZL IP (34 H allowed)   

140-39: RHRP Joe Zeller 5'10" 190 Lbs (198710) [2010-28, CA college] {100:-0.02}
18/6 K/W in 27.2 NWL IP (26H and 0 HR allowed).

141-40: RHRP Ryan Hartman 6'3" 180 Lbs (199205) [2010-16] {102:-0.04}
33/20 K/W in 26.2 AZL IP (27H & 3 HR). Wild   

145-41: RHswing Su-Min Jung 6'2" 190 Lbs (199004) [KR] {125:-0.57} 
19/24 K/W in 43.2 MWL IP (23H & 3 HR) 18/25 K/W in 21.2 NWL IP (15H & 2 HR)
Can't find the strike zone.   
 
147-42: miFA RHRP Alvaro Sosa 6'0" 181 Lbs (198606) [DO] {139:-1.09} Played IF 2007-2009
35/21 K/W in 55.1 MWL IP (52H&2HR allowed)

151-43: RHswing Gilberto Abreu 6'2" 180 Lbs (199308) (2010-DO).
34/34 K/W in 35.1 DSL IP (29H & 1 HR allowed)
87-91 mph FB that could be plus pitch someday

157-44: RHRP Felix Pena 6'2" 186 Lbs (199002) [DO] {144:-1.33}
32/9 K/W in 39 AZL IP (48H&8HR allowed)   
 
161-45: RHSwing Yomar Morel 6'1" 180 Lbs (199311)
31/17 K/W in 31.0 DSL IP (19 H & 0 HR)

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 23, 2011, 06:33:09 pm
The new MLB agreement

Any team that exceeds its assigned Rule 4 Draft signing bonus budget by 0-5% pays a 75% tax, any team that exceeds its bonus budget by 5-10% pays a 75% tax AND loses its 1st round draft pick in the next Rule 4 Draft, any club that exceeds its bonus budget by 10-15% pays a 100% tax AND loses its 1st & 2nd round picks in the next draft, and any team that exceeds its bonus budget by more than 15% pays a 100% tax AND loses 1st round picks in the next two drafts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 23, 2011, 06:34:32 pm
There also will be a signing bonus budget limit for international players (who are not subject to selection in the Rule 4 Draft). The budget will be the same for all MLB clubs for the first year (the budget is expected to be about $3M for each club the first year), and then will vary from club-to-club starting with the second year of the agreement.

Any team that exceeds the international signing bonus budget by 0-5% in a given year pays a 75% tax, any team that exceeds the bonus budget by 5-10% pays a 75% tax AND can sign only one player for more than a $500K bonus the next season, any team that exceeds the international signing bonus budget by 10-15% pays a 100% tax AND can sign no players for more than a $500K bonus the next season, and any team that exceeds the international signing bonus budget by more than 15% pays a 100% tax AND can sign no players for more than a $250K bonus the following season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 23, 2011, 06:35:38 pm
Interesting.

A club will be permitted to "trade" to another club (or clubs) any of its unspent international bonus budget.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 23, 2011, 06:42:45 pm
As originally reported, the limit on draft budgets was to be $2.9 million for the first ten rounds, and not over $100k for any subsequent picks. That would be a ridiculously low amount for any team drafting early, with all of their own picks plus supplemental picks.

It now appears that the actual limit may average as much as $5 or $6 million, and include adjustments for draft position and supplemental picks. The final details have not yet been agreed upon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 23, 2011, 06:55:05 pm
Even 5 or 6 million wouldn't be much for teams drafting in the first 3 or 4 spots.

The limit on international signings will really destroy the edge that the Cubs were gradually building in that area.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 23, 2011, 07:13:25 pm
There will be teams who aren't as active in the international market as the Cubs who may be willing to trade their surplus. But there may be fierce competition for those surpluses.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 23, 2011, 07:38:39 pm
According to a Baseball America article the cap for individual teams ranges from $4.5 to 11.0 million depending on drafting position and number of compensation picks.  The total cap for 2012 is expected to be $200 million; $228 was spent by all teams in the last draft. Not a draconian cut.




-----------LEFTHANDED STARTING PITCHERS---------------------------------
30-01: LHSP Chris Rusin 6'2" 185 Lbs (198610) [2009-04, UKentucky] {47:0.90}
95/30 K/W in 138.2 SL/PCL IP (150H & 13 HR). Soft-tossing lefty.

37-02: LHSP Hunter Ackerman 6'1" 190 Lbs (199010) [2010-04, NC JC] {94:0.06}
49/21 K/W in 44 AZL IP (46H&3HR allowed)
88-91 MPH FB that induces ground balls and advanced-change up.

45-03: LHSP Zach Rosscup 6'2" 205 Lbs (198806) [2009-28 (TB), Oregon CC]{26:1.23}
50/19 K/W in 49.2 FSL IP (43 H and 4 HR allowed).     
         
48-04: LHSP Frank Del Valle 5'11" 190 Lbs (198909) {77b:0.42}
31/11 K/W in 42.2 MWL IP (36H&3HR).
Arizona Phil: Low 90's FB with plus movement and outstanding breaking ball.
 
52-05: LHSP Austin Kirk 6'1" 200 Lbs (199005) [2009-03] {66:0.66}
122/38 K/W in 151 MWL IP (143H & 17 HR allowed)
Tossed July 4 nohitter.

54-06: LHSP Brian Smith 6'0" 170 Lbs (199212) [2011-40, Ontario HS] {56:0.80}
90-93 FB and good change up. 41/23 K/W in 46.1 AZL IP (46H&1 HR). 
Canadian Junior National Team
 
73-07: LHSP Brooks Raley 6'3" 185 Lbs (198806) [2009-06, TexasA&M] {93:0.07} 
80/45 K/W in 136.1 SL IP (170H&16HR allowed).
[2011 BA26]   

85-08: LHSP Willengton Cruz 6'2" 170 Lb {(199008) {84:0.27}
Spent 2010 in DSL. In 2011, 50/31 K/W in 53.1 NWL IP (50H & 5 HR allowed).     

91-09: LHSP Graham Hicks 6'5" 170 Lbs R/R (199002) [2008-04(Nationals)] {106:-0.12}
40/23 K/W in 58.1 MWL IP(55H&7HR). Healthy shoulder?
 
103-10: LHSP Cam Greathouse 6'2" 230 Lb(199007) [2010-08, Gulf Coast CC] {81:0.30}
49/53 K/W but only 41 H allowed in 57 MWL innings.
Demoted to NWL--> AZl to work on command but got worse.
   
158-11: LHSP Angel Mejias 6'3" 180 Lbs (199310) [VZ, 2010]
15/19 K/W in 26.1 DSL IP (21 H & 0 HR)
Hard to hit when he throws strikes.  Projectable body. Already sits in upper 80s.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 23, 2011, 09:12:44 pm
The changes are unfortunate, given that after all of these years the Cubs finally had an owner and a GM who had the sense to take advantage of the former rules and their relative riches. 

I don't see it making all the big of an impact, other than restraining further rampant spending inflation.  The idea of having the spending adjusted for where you draft and how many supplemental picks you get makes perfect sense.  The principle is that teams drafting early are intended to get some competitive advantage, so obviously allowing them a larger spending cap would make sense. 

I think the biggest practical impact on the whole minor league situation is that this should really limit the volume of HS players who will choose to sign.  The Cubs signed a whole batch of teenagers after six this year; why would those guys sign under the new system, if they can't get serious cash now, but might in a couple of years?  I think the minors will become more heavily populated by college and Latin kids. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 23, 2011, 09:18:46 pm
When it comes to these Cuban and Japanese prospects, I'm wondering if the new rules that will take effect next year will cause Theocracy to invest this year while they can.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on November 23, 2011, 10:15:40 pm
On the international front, I wonder if it might not be better just to sign the top 10-15 guys 1 year and say oops, guess that means I can't sign anyone for more than 250,000 this year.  You have to be able to pay the %100 tax but seems like it would be worth it. Anything for a competitive advantage. The third year you just go back to normal after all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 23, 2011, 10:22:42 pm
As Craig said, although the cuts are not draconian, they have the effect of eliminating any edge the Cubs might have gotten by better scouting and larger budgeting for overseas signings.

I think Ray is right in thinking that the better teams will still find ways to game the system to their benefit.  Just now as much to their benefit as before.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on November 23, 2011, 11:10:36 pm
The best leadership will always find competitive advantage.

Let's hope that's exactly what our new crew will do...they certainly are working at it!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 23, 2011, 11:14:09 pm
As Craig said, although the cuts are not draconian, they have the effect of eliminating any edge the Cubs might have gotten by better scouting and larger budgeting for overseas signings.

I think Ray is right in thinking that the better teams will still find ways to game the system to their benefit.  Just now as much to their benefit as before.


Better scouting is quite different from larger budgeting.  Teams who scout better will still have an advantage, and if anything the premium will be even greater on scouting well.  I think that will remain a top priority for the new management, and it should be. 


In the NFL, for example, there are pretty strict bonus constraints, and there is no international signing factor.  But that doesn't mean everybody scouts equally well or has equal results.  Green Bay didn't win the SB and get off to this year's 10-0 start by larger budgeting; they did it by better scouting and better development.  (And, of course, some good luck.)  Granted, the Cubs probably need to improve to become average in scouting/development, much less superior. 


But I admit a good part of me thinks it's a good system where smarter management/scouting organizations can be rewarded and can beat organizations who are simply richer.  Unfortunately to date it seems the Cubs have been richer but have never been smarter. 


Still, effectiveness at scouting both abroad and at home can be impacted by the size and quality of the scouting staff.  Hoyer was building up San Diego's staff to be 80% of what MacP had going 15 years ago for the Cubs.  It's up to Hoyer and McLeod to be smarter within the system rather than to just outspend the competition. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 23, 2011, 11:27:50 pm
I suppose a better term to use would have been "more extensive" scouting.  If you have 5 times as many scouts in the field overseas (assuming equal ability of the scouts), and 5 times the budget of other teams, you could perhaps have signed 5 times as many prospects as the others, and as a result could have had 5 times as many good prospects.

With the current system, no matter how many scouts you have out there, you can not spend more money than those who have much fewer scouts and do a lesser job of scouting.  In addition, since no player can be signed without first being registered for all to see, you can not sign an overseas prospect without first letting all other teams know that he is to be sought after.

As I said above, the better teams will still learn how to game the system to have better results than the worse teams, but the rewards will likely be smaller.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 23, 2011, 11:37:16 pm
On the international front, I wonder if it might not be better just to sign the top 10-15 guys 1 year and say oops, guess that means I can't sign anyone for more than 250,000 this year.  You have to be able to pay the %100 tax but seems like it would be worth it. Anything for a competitive advantage. The third year you just go back to normal after all.

That is a possibility.  But as you say, it means that you have to be willing to pay double what the other teams would offer them.  If you exceed the target, there is a 100% "tax" added to your cost.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 24, 2011, 12:58:51 am
As Craig said, although the cuts are not draconian, they have the effect of eliminating any edge the Cubs might have gotten by better scouting and larger budgeting for overseas signings.

I think Ray is right in thinking that the better teams will still find ways to game the system to their benefit.  Just now as much to their benefit as before.

The Cubs still have an advantage over most teams in scouting in the Dominican Republic, Venezuala and the Pacific Rim. Some of our better Dominican players were signed for five-figure bonuses.

Also, the restricted budgets should reduce the bonuses paid to the premier prospects, since no team will want to spend half or more of their annual budget on a 16-year-old kid.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on November 24, 2011, 05:39:38 am
Also, the restricted budgets should reduce the bonuses paid to the premier prospects, since no team will want to spend half or more of their annual budget on a 16-year-old kid.

That's why to me it might be worth exceeding that cap by a really good margin in a year of excellent talent.  If you're cutting bonuses by 25-50% to get guys under the cap, a 100% tax might have you paying just what you pay now per player.  Of course, the first time a team does it, then you've given the idea to every other team out there, and have to worry bout competing with teams doing it in subsequent years then....although, it would probably be naive to think it wouldn't occur to everyone else anyway.  There are suppose to be pretty sharp guys running these teams, after all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 24, 2011, 06:29:45 am
There are suppose to be pretty sharp guys running these teams, after all.

And the new rules increase the odds that there will within the next three years be significantly more teams for them to run.

Mark Cuban, and others like him who are mavericks not only by association with a team but by nature, and who have deep pockets and a desire to won a sports franchise, should see this as a great opportunity to create a rival league.

If MLB stands by these rules and a new league, without such rules, comes in and signs up the bulk of the top young talent for a few years, it will not take them long before that talent matures and the product on the field is better than what MLB has out there.  We have seen upstart leagues in the past take a similar approach when they did so without the advantage spending caps will create for an upstart not limited by caps.

I suspect we will see it again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on November 24, 2011, 06:44:28 am
And the new rules increase the odds that there will within the next three years be significantly more teams for them to run.

Mark Cuban, and others like him who are mavericks not only by association with a team but by nature, and who have deep pockets and a desire to won a sports franchise, should see this as a great opportunity to create a rival league.

If MLB stands by these rules and a new league, without such rules, comes in and signs up the bulk of the top young talent for a few years, it will not take them long before that talent matures and the product on the field is better than what MLB has out there.  We have seen upstart leagues in the past take a similar approach when they did so without the advantage spending caps will create for an upstart not limited by caps.

I suspect we will see it again.

And those leagues generally went bankrupt if i recall correctly.  Much easier to do that in other sports too, because the players are more major league ready.  Not the same in baseball.  Baseball is also the only major sport without a draft cap till now.  I fail to see how the Nfl, and Nba can get by with it but it's going to cause the destruction of mlb.  Saying the sport who's drafted guys are the farthest away from being high contributing, premium guys(sometimes 5+ years) having the most problems from a draft cap seems illogical. 

A new league such as this would be nothing more than a lot of money going into the acquisition and developing of player(s) with no assurances they will develop into anything.  I can't see a smart guy doing this if he looks at the success/failure rate of one particular year's first round.  Plus, what sort of product does this league put on the field while their guys develop...just doesn't seem practical.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 24, 2011, 07:07:38 am
And those leagues generally went bankrupt if i recall correctly.

Neither the ABA nor AFL went bankrupt.

The rival baseball leagues which went bankrupt did so before the advent of the minor leagues, before the advent of the draft, before any meaningful talent came from college, before most high schools had any teams, and before broadcast revenues.  That history is pretty meaningless.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 24, 2011, 08:14:36 am
If the opportunity for a new league is based on the old league spending "only" $200 million on drafted prospects and $100 more internationally, that's not exactly a low threshold for a rival league to blow past.  Especially since the guys whose bonuses are somewhat limited will mostly be teenage draftables and 16-year-old internationals; if the new league is investing $500 million a year on procurement to beat out the old league's $300 mill, the new league will need to wait five years or more before those teenage investments start to pay off. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 24, 2011, 09:25:20 am
The new rules seem to be aimed at achieving what both management and players want.  They hope to reduce the amount of money going to prospects, increase the amount of money going to vets, and reduce the chances of a new league becoming successful.

But what the "league" wants is not necessarily what individual teams want within that league.  It will be interesting to see how teams "game" the system to get the edge.  Already, posters have mentioned some possibilities.

From a selfish point of view, I am sorry to see the changes.  For years, the Cubs let other teams outscout and outspend then.  Now, when it has started to look like the wheel has turned more in favor of the Cubs, they bring in a new wheel.

Do the international signing rules apply immediately, or is there a phase in period.  The Cubs have been busy in the DR and other places since the season ended.  Can they still sign players for a while without the tax
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 24, 2011, 09:25:39 am
And where exactly will the owners in the new league find host cities and the hundeds of millions of dollars needed to build new stadiums? Where are the going to find lucrative television and radio contracts? Most billionaires are used to taking risks, but few if any of them invested a billion or more on a start-up venture that would almost certainly lose money for a decade or more. And how, exactly, are they going to keep their star players from jumping to MLB?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 24, 2011, 09:34:47 am
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=15574
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 24, 2011, 09:54:50 am
And where exactly will the owners in the new league find host cities and the hundeds of millions of dollars needed to build new stadiums? Where are the going to find lucrative television and radio contracts? Most billionaires are used to taking risks, but few if any of them invested a billion or more on a start-up venture that would almost certainly lose money for a decade or more. And how, exactly, are they going to keep their star players from jumping to MLB?

Those are substantial problems that have prevented new leagues from coming into existence for years.  But nothing is foolproof, as all the above problems were dealt with with both by the ABA and the AFL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 24, 2011, 11:14:57 am
If the opportunity for a new league is based on the old league spending "only" $200 million on drafted prospects and $100 more internationally, that's not exactly a low threshold for a rival league to blow past.  Especially since the guys whose bonuses are somewhat limited will mostly be teenage draftables and 16-year-old internationals; if the new league is investing $500 million a year on procurement to beat out the old league's $300 mill, the new league will need to wait five years or more before those teenage investments start to pay off.

Considering that there is no shortage of people willing to buy existing teams, and to do so for prices in excess of $500M for the individual team, that amount would not seem prohibitive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 24, 2011, 11:22:22 am
Jeff: Thanks for the BP link.

What stood out to me:

"Hitting ability is an issue" with Jackson.  A concern since outfielders live or die with the bat.

Baez is not athletic enough to play SS.  I guess he better hit.

Castillo offers a combination rarely seen with catchers: Plus power and arm (but little else).

Scouts believe Maples will gain velocity with professional coaching.

Some scouts from other organizations see Lake as a future relief pitcher.  A true 80 arm.  Does that mean mid 90's?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 24, 2011, 11:23:33 am
And where exactly will the owners in the new league find host cities and the hundeds of millions of dollars needed to build new stadiums? Where are the going to find lucrative television and radio contracts? Most billionaires are used to taking risks, but few if any of them invested a billion or more on a start-up venture that would almost certainly lose money for a decade or more. And how, exactly, are they going to keep their star players from jumping to MLB?

There are plenty of cities which would be happy to have a new team.  I would be surprised if any of the 5 largest markets in the country would create any obstacles, and suspect that many cities would eagerly do all it could to help things along.  Stadiums exist and could be rented, even if they were not all like Yankee Stadium.  Considering the number of programming outlets now on cable, it would be remarkably easy to find someone to broadcast games.  And as to the risks involved, it would be little different from the risks which were involved with the ABA and AFL.  As to keeping their star players from jumping, that is what contracts are for.  If you remember the ABA and AFL also had some of their players leave for the more established leagues.... just as the more established leagues had some of their own more established players jump to the upstarts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 24, 2011, 12:16:58 pm
Baseball Prospectus


Five-Star Prospects
1. Brett Jackson (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/player_search.php?search_name=Brett+Jackson), OF


Four-Star Prospects
2. Javier Baez, SS


Three-Star Prospects
3. Welington Castillo (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/card/card.php?id=CASTILLO19870424A), C
4. Dillon Maples, RHP
5. Matt Szczur, OF
6. Josh Vitters (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/card/card.php?id=VITTERS19890827A), 3B
7. Jeimer Candelario, 3B
8. Trey McNutt (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/card/card.php?id=MCNUTT19890802A), RHP
9. Marco Hernandez, SS


Two-Star Prospects
10. Junior Lake (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/card/card.php?id=LAKE19900327A), SS/3B
11. Rafael Dolis (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/card/card.php?id=DOLIS00000000A), RHP

Nine More:
12. Dan Vogelbach, 1B (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/glossary/index.php?search=1B)
: This second-round pick is a big, unathletic, bat-only type, but his power is very real.
13. Jae-Hoon Ha (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/card/card.php?id=HA19901029A), OF: He lacks the power for a corner, but he’s not quite a center fielder, so he’s a bit of a tweener.
14. Chris Carpenter (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/player_search.php?search_name=Chris+Carpenter), RHP: He still has outstanding velocity, but his command troubles and injury history are red flags.
15. Tony Zych, RHP: Zych, a fourth-round pick, has late-inning potential with mid- to upper-90s heat, but he needs to improve his breaking ball.
16. Ryan Flaherty (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/card/card.php?id=FLAHERTY19860727A), UT: He hit 19 home runs in 2011, but he doesn't have a defensive home and has to cheat for power.
17. DJ Lemahieu (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/card/card.php?id=LEMAHIEU19880713A), INF: He’s similar to Flaherty, but without the power.
18. Zeke DeVoss, OF: He’s a speedster with a good approach, but since pitchers have no reason to fear him, his on-base skills could deteriorate.
19. Reggie Golden, OF: Golden has impressive tools, but he still has a very long way to go.
20. Marwin Gonzalez (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/card/card.php?id=GONZALEZ19890314A), INF:
He’s certainly not an upside guy, but he could arrive as early as this year in a utility spot.

More
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=15574 (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=15574)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 24, 2011, 12:20:44 pm
It is interesting to read different scouting reports.  BP says Ha is a tweener, not good enough to excel in CF.  I have seen other reports that say that Ha is the only Gold Glove caliber CF in the system.

The suggestion that Lake should become a pitcher has been around for some time.  Most are based upon estimates that he could easily have Chapman type speed and top 100 mph consistently, if given proper training.  However, whether or not he could ever develop any other necessary pitcher, or whether or not he could ever command the fastball are answers that could only be answered over time.

Sometimes, a change can work out.  Burke made the switch last year, and has looked very promising.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 24, 2011, 12:24:15 pm
From my very limited experience of watching Junior Lake

His throws from the mound to the plate would have to be considerably more accurate than the ones he makes from third to first.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on November 24, 2011, 01:01:54 pm
Interesting that BP #16 and #20 Cubs prospects are being exposed to the Rule 5---and not low levels guys either but guys who played at AAA.  I don't remember Cubs ever doing that.  I guess that Theo is a lot more concerned about upside prospects and neither Flaherty or Gonzalez seem to fit into that category.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 24, 2011, 01:06:58 pm
Interesting that BP #16 and #20 Cubs prospects are being exposed to the Rule 5---and not low levels guys either but guys who played at AAA.  I don't remember Cubs ever doing that.  I guess that Theo is a lot more concerned about upside prospects and neither Flaherty or Gonzalez seem to fit into that category.
The 40-man roster is at 34 so it's not as if there was no room for them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 24, 2011, 01:18:23 pm
I think that the roster spots will soon be filled with free agent acquisitions and prospects brought over from Boston or San Diego through trades or the draft.

I am not certain, but I believe that since they have offered arbitration to Ramirez and pena, that roster spots have to be left open for them until they reject arbitration.  If so, that brings it up to 36.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 24, 2011, 01:18:27 pm
Considering that there is no shortage of people willing to buy existing teams, and to do so for prices in excess of $500M for the individual team, that amount would not seem prohibitive.

An existing team starts with a minor league system, front-office and coaching staff, players, a ballpark to play in and a fan base. The teams in your proposed league would have none of that.

Let's assume that each of the new teams build their primary team with MLB retreads and most but not all of the best college prospects and their sole minor league team with most but not all of the best high school and foreign players. Very optimistically, it takes the best team in the league only five years to become competitive with the 2011 Houston Astros. In the meantime, where's the revenue stream to support this? What are the odds that the less successful owners won't bail out and leave the league bankrupt?

Further, what's to prevent the league's best players from moving to MLB? And where are they going to play their games?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on November 24, 2011, 01:30:47 pm
I think that the roster spots will soon be filled with free agent acquisitions and prospects brought over from Boston or San Diego through trades or the draft.

I am not certain, but I believe that since they have offered arbitration to Ramirez and pena, that roster spots have to be left open for them until they reject arbitration.  If so, that brings it up to 36.

Of course, a numbers crunch is always a factor on whether to roster guys on the bubble. That's why we lamented the need to roster Szuzur because Cubs had to re-write his contract. Still, I haven't checked all the other clubs, but I think 34 is unusually low compared to other clubs---many of whom have similar issues as Cubs.

I guess it just tells us something about what Cubs think about Flaherty that they maintained Koyie Hill's roster spot instead of rostering Flaherty. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 24, 2011, 02:25:57 pm
I had forgotten about Hill.  Did they offer him arbitration?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 24, 2011, 02:39:03 pm
Dave, yesterday was the deadline for offering arbitration to your former players who declared free agency (Ramirez, Pena, Wood, Johnson, Lopez, Ortiz, Grabow).

The deadline for offering arbitration to your pre-FA arbitration eligible players is December 12th (Garza, Soto, Hill, DeWitt, Baker, Wells).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 24, 2011, 04:04:34 pm
Thanks, Jeff.  It is hard to think of a reason why they would leave Hill on the 40 man roster if they do not plan to have him on the team  next year.

Makes me wonder if the new group is any better than the old group.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 24, 2011, 04:16:17 pm
There's really no need for the roster space before that December 12th date, though.  For whatever reason, it's typical not to deroster your intended non-tenders before that date.

If Hill is still on the roster on December 13th, we can start worrying about the new regime.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 24, 2011, 05:10:27 pm
NL Central 40-man rosters

Chicago - 34
Cincinnati - 40
Houston - 38
Milwaukee - 36
Pittsburgh - 40
St. Louis - 36
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 24, 2011, 05:19:12 pm
What does this mean?  It means that the new Cubs leadership believes that the talent in the Cubs organization is horrible and can be easily improved through the waiver process, the Rule 5 draft, and by signing other teams' non-tenders.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 24, 2011, 05:19:41 pm
Also known as "the Hendry legacy".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 24, 2011, 05:46:33 pm
An existing team starts with a minor league system, front-office and coaching staff, players, a ballpark to play in and a fan base. The teams in your proposed league would have none of that.

I am not proposing a league.  I am predicting a league, and before it would have its first game, the teams would have all of those things.... except for a fan base.

My prediction is based on the incentive the new rules will create for young talent to look elsewhere.  The degree to which that would be the case won't really be known until after the 2012 draft, meaning even if my prediction comes to pass, we would not likely see a rival league form until 2013, with its first games likely in 2014.

Let's assume that each of the new teams build their primary team with MLB retreads and most but not all of the best college prospects and their sole minor league team with most but not all of the best high school and foreign players. Very optimistically, it takes the best team in the league only five years to become competitive with the 2011 Houston Astros. In the meantime, where's the revenue stream to support this? What are the odds that the less successful owners won't bail out and leave the league bankrupt?

How long did it take the AFL and ABA to become serious competitive rivals on the field to the NFA and NBA?  About 10 years?  That is about what I would expect in a rival baseball league.  But the NBA and AFL both became rivals for fan revenues at least 3-4 years before that, which, again, is about what I would expect with a rival baseball league.  The odd that less successful owners would bail or go bankrupt?  Quite high.  Again, if they are lucky, it would most likely track the path of the AFL and NBA, both of which I believe had some owners bail and some teams go into bankruptcy.

Further, what's to prevent the league's best players from moving to MLB?

Contracts.  The same thing MLB would have to rely on to avoid having some of their stars move to a new league, and under the collective bargaining agreement with MLB, anytime a player's contract expired, he would have the option of heading to the new league.  Not just players qualifying for free agency, but ANY player.  A player like Starlin Castro, with a contract expiring at the end of his 2nd season, would have the option of jumping to the new league.

And where are they going to play their games?

Stadiums.  Some of them in NFL stadiums.  Some of them in new stadiums or baseball parks built just for baseball.  Some in college facilities.  Perhaps some in former minor league facilities.  As the league would become more established, some teams, or cities, might even be persuaded to make the capital investment in new facilities competing with those of MLB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 24, 2011, 06:54:31 pm
-----------------------LEFTHANDED RELIEF PITCHERS
23-01: LHRP Jeff Beliveau 6'1" 190 Lbs (198701) [2008-18, Fl Atl] {05:0.98}
69/13 K/W in 57 SL IP.  Only 37 Hits allowed (0.183 BAA) TeamUSA2011

34-02: LHSwing Jeffry Antigua 6'1" 170 lbs (199006) [2006-DO] {18:1.53}   
81/18 K/W in 83 FSL IP (75H & 9 HR)   
           
35-03: LHRP Kyler Burke  6'3" 205 Lbs (198804) [2006-01S as OF, Padres] {82:0.30} 
47/18 K/W in 44 NWL IP (36H and 2 HR). Dominated against younger competition.
Mid 90's FB. 

43-04: LHRP Scott Maine 6'1" 215 Lbs (198502) [2007-06, Diamondbacks] {15:1.62}
72/25 K/W in 51.1 PCL IP (38H & 3 HR allowed). Allowed 4 HR in 7 ML IP.   
[2011 Cubs BA14] 

46-05: LHRP John Gaub 6'2" 210 Lbs (198504) [2006-21,UMinn wStevens/Archer for DeRosa] {28:1.21}
75/40 K/W in 55.1 PCL IP (42H and 6 HR allowed). 
     
50-06: LHSwing Eric Jokisch 6'2" 185 Lbs (198907) (2011-11, Northwestern) {51:0.84}
After solid 103/32 K/W in 118.2 MWL IP (106H, 13 HR) bumped to SL for 3 starts.
FB tops out in high 80's.  Cubs best MiL pitcher in 2011 (B America?)
   
76-07: LHSwing Casey Harman 6'1" 210 Lbs (198903) (2010-29, Clemson) {34:1.12} 
Dominated in 25 MWL IP.  48/12 K/W in 58 FSL IP.  Allowed 71 H and 10 HR.

150-08: LHSwing Jeff Lorick 6'0" 195 Lbs (198712) [2009-20(Braves)] {129:-0.60}   
75/44 K/W in 113.2 FSL IP (133H&10HR).

152-09: LHRP Brent Ebinger 6'0" 190 Lbs (198806) [2010-32] {131:-0.68}
10/3 K/W in 20.1 MWL IP(15H&01HR). 30/15 K/W in 43 FSL IP(66H&2 HR).   

LHSwing Warner Eusebio 5'9" 164 Lbs (199309)
30/10 K/W in 37.0 DSL IP (26 H & 1 HR allowed)

LHSwing Victor Garcia 6'2" 175 Lbs (199204) [VE]
64/27 K/W in 55.0 DSL IP (43H & 2 HR allowed)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 24, 2011, 08:00:39 pm
When is the rule 5 draft this year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 24, 2011, 08:08:03 pm
December 8th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 24, 2011, 08:18:54 pm
I have been reading ArizonaPhil comments.

It seems that on December 2, Hill could be non-tendered and removed from the 40 man roster.  If so, he could be offered a minor league contract (at major league money) and kept as an emergency catcher at Iowa.  If instead of being non-tendered, he had just been released, he could not resign with the Cubs until May 15, although he could sign with any other club immediately.

Non tendering would make sense, and would open up one more roster spot on the 40 man roster.  If he is not non-tendered, we pretty much have him all season unless he is released.

The same applies to Marcos Mateo, who also might be non-tendered and resigned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on November 24, 2011, 09:16:15 pm
I am not proposing a league.  I am predicting a league, and before it would have its first game, the teams would have all of those things.... except for a fan base.

Just so I understand you, you are actually predicting a new league will come up because of the draft rules?  And this with baseball talent the most hit and (mostly) miss of all sports, and the furthest from being ready?  You are predicting something that didn't happen when the NFL and NBA(both drafts with near league ready talent) instituted the same thing?  That just seems highly illogical.

Not to mention all the MLB would have to do is go back to the old draft rules if they feel their product is threatened, and I don't doubt for a second they would.  I think this threat would be as much of an obstacle as the cost and development time.  Any prospective owners of a new league would have to address that likelihood. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 24, 2011, 09:25:53 pm
Just so I understand you, you are actually predicting a new league will come up because of the draft rules?  And this with baseball talent the most hit and (mostly) miss of all sports, and the furthest from being ready?  You are predicting something that didn't happen when the NFL and NBA(both drafts with near league ready talent) instituted the same thing?  That just seems highly illogical.

Not to mention all the MLB would have to do is go back to the old draft rules if they feel their product is threatened, and I don't doubt for a second they would.  I think this threat would be as much of an obstacle as the cost and development time.  Any prospective owners of a new league would have to address that likelihood. 

Ray - You are feeding the beast by taking it seriously.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 24, 2011, 10:18:10 pm
Just so I understand you, you are actually predicting a new league will come up because of the draft rules?

"Just so (you) understand," this was the prediction -- And the new rules increase the odds that there will within the next three years be significantly more teams for them to run....  We have seen upstart leagues in the past take a similar approach when they did so without the advantage spending caps will create for an upstart not limited by caps.  I suspect we will see it again.

Not exactly saying anything is a certainty to say, "I suspect we will see (an upstart) again."

You are predicting something that didn't happen when the NFL and NBA(both drafts with near league ready talent) instituted the same thing?  That just seems highly illogical.

I'm sure you won't hesitate to correct me if I am wrong, but neither the NFL nor NBA have instituted signing bonus caps which are nearly as restrictive as those MLB is adopting.


Not to mention all the MLB would have to do is go back to the old draft rules if they feel their product is threatened, and I don't doubt for a second they would.

They would.... but they would also have to get the MLBPA to agree, and since many players would see an upstart league as driving up their salaries, owners might not get the agreement they would need from the players association.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on November 24, 2011, 11:01:55 pm
Jes is predicting a new baseball league?

Can I nominate him for commissioner of this new league?

How about something like dictator for life of this new league?

In fact, it should be named the Jes Baseball League of America -- JBLA for short.

This new league will probably take up his whole life and not give him any free time to visit us here, but sacrifice is required by all great visionaries.

Good luck, Jes.

You will be missed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 24, 2011, 11:17:56 pm
Jes, your Potemkin League is never going to happen, regardless of how many posts you make.

First, their are no suitable baseball parks available, and no politician would support public funding in this economy to build one. You suggested minor league parks (far too small) and NFL stadiums (far too big, nearly impossible to reconfigure for baseball, and only available with the stadium owner's consent). So, for the first two years' of the league's existence, each owner will have to find a site, win zoning approval and build a $250-500 million stadium.

Next, prospects won't sign with the startup league for 10 or 20% more than MLB will pay them. If MLB's limits are $6.7 million for the draft and $2.9 million for foreign players per team, the new league's team will need to budget at least $15 to $20 million per team. And, of course, MLB could raise their limits.

But wait, they'll first need to hire competent scouts and draft directors, or they'll wind up signing the wrong prospects. Then they'll need to find credible managers, coaches and front-office personnel to attract prospects. Where will these people come from?

You said it would be easy to find a TV network to carry their games, and perhaps you are right. But they'll not receive much revenue for the TV rights. They'll also have difficulties developing a fan base and selling tickets, particularly in current MLB cities.

Now picture the plight of the owner of the Portland Sea Dogs five years from now. He's invested $1 billion in a rag-tag baseball team and a nearly empty stadium. He's still losing money at a rapid rate, two of the original 12 franchises are in bankruptcy and being run by the league office, and three other owners are on the brink. Then "Larry" Bud retires, and the new Commissioner moves aggressively to sign away your best players, while using MLB's anti-trust exemption and higher pay scales to lock up their own players and kill your league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 25, 2011, 08:11:55 am
Jes, your Potemkin League is never going to happen, regardless of how many posts you make.

Aside from my first post, I have responded to questions, or comments which invited response.  It is not as if I have been lobbying anyone here to start an effort to put together a rival league.

First, their are no suitable baseball parks available, and no politician would support public funding in this economy to build one.

The Bears played football in Wrigley Field for at least a few years, and several MLB teams have played in football stadiums for extended periods in the last 40 years -- it is not as if teams have never played in venues which were well less than perfect for their sport, and still ended up being successful.  Look at the history of the AFL and ABA.  As to no politicians supporting public funding.... have you looked at our politicians lately?  Many would push the idea as a jobs proposal.

You suggested minor league parks (far too small) and NFL stadiums (far too big, nearly impossible to reconfigure for baseball, and only available with the stadium owner's consent). So, for the first two years' of the league's existence, each owner will have to find a site, win zoning approval and build a $250-500 million stadium.

In other words they would have to do the same sort of thing that was successfully done with the AFL and ABA.


Next, prospects won't sign with the startup league for 10 or 20% more than MLB will pay them. If MLB's limits are $6.7 million for the draft and $2.9 million for foreign players per team, the new league's team will need to budget at least $15 to $20 million per team.

The AFL and ABA faced the same hurdle EXCEPT that it was much higher because the NFL and NBA did not impose any limit on signing bonuses.  The new rule will make it much, much easier if there is an effort to create a rival league.


And, of course, MLB could raise their limits.

And, as I have pointed out before, they will need the approval of the MBPLA to do that, and the MBPLA would have no incentive to give that approval, and considerable incentive not to.  A rival league would mean much higher player salaries, particularly for young players.  Someone such as Starlin Castro would suddenly be paid based on his value to the team, and even players such as Darwin Barney would see much higher salaries.


But wait, they'll first need to hire competent scouts and draft directors, or they'll wind up signing the wrong prospects. Then they'll need to find credible managers, coaches and front-office personnel to attract prospects. Where will these people come from?

There are not only plenty or retreads out there, and also folks like Sandberg,  but also lots of armchair second-guessers like we have here who would jump at the chance, as well as some of the new owners themselves, or the children of rich owners (such as Tom Ricketts) who would take front office jobs, and some names from the past such as Pete Rose who might well be lured back to the game if they were only given a chance.

Finding front office staff and scouts and managers and coaches would actually be quite easy.  Would all of them be competent?  Of course not.  You do not have all of those now with MLB teams competent.

You said it would be easy to find a TV network to carry their games, and perhaps you are right. But they'll not receive much revenue for the TV rights. They'll also have difficulties developing a fan base and selling tickets, particularly in current MLB cities.

The AFL and ABA faced those same difficulties, only at far greater levels.... and they succeeded, without having any prior role models to follow.  As to selling tickets in current MLB cities.... be real.  If there were a startup in Chicago in 2012, it would have little difficulty selling tickets if the team were run at all competently.

Until a few minutes ago I was unaware that the Mets and Astros were direct outgrowths of a proposed rival league 50 years ago.

The Mets began play four years after the Brooklyn Dodgers and New York Giants moved west in 1958, leaving New York City with only one MLB team in the Yankees. In 1959, New York City attorney William Shea, with support from baseball figures including former Dodgers executive Branch Rickey, proposed a third major league called the Continental League. Houston and New York City were both among the announced CL cities. MLB responded to the threat by placing new franchises in several of these cities, and offered a National League franchise to the owners of the proposed New York CL team, who accepted. With Shea's goal of bringing a second major-league team to New York successful, he abandoned the new league, which officially folded in 1960 without ever playing a game. The Mets began play in 1962 at the Giants' former home of the Polo Grounds in Manhattan, moved in 1964 to Shea Stadium (named after the aforementioned William Shea) in Queens....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Major_League_Baseball_season
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 25, 2011, 09:11:20 am
You guys realize that Jes is laughing at the fact that he's getting you to respond to his apparently ever more silly posts, right?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 25, 2011, 09:22:12 am
Silly to point to history as an indication of what might happen again?

Yea, wild and crazy stuff.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 25, 2011, 10:12:35 am
History also gives us an indication of how unlikely that a particular thing would be to occur.  No new major league baseball league has succeeded for over one hundred years.  Even the new football and basketball leagues eventually disappeared, and were absorbed into the single major league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 25, 2011, 12:35:00 pm
It depends on how you define success.

The ABA and AFL were both successful, even though they were absorbed.  For that matter, the proposed Continental League was in some ways successful in the late 1950's, without playing a single game, in that it forced MLB to add four teams in order to gut the planned Continental League.

A great many successful business ventures eventually cease to operate, or are absorbed by another enterprise, but that does not mean they are unsuccessful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 25, 2011, 12:55:09 pm
It certainly does depend upon how you define success.  Most of the teams in the new leagues went bankrupt, and the league as a whole was absorbed into the old league.  Certainly for the teams that went bankrupt, it was not a success.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on November 25, 2011, 12:59:25 pm
Wait, he's being serious about a new league and thinks it actually could work?

That's hilarious!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 25, 2011, 01:31:18 pm
Wait, he's being serious about a new league and thinks it actually could work?

That's hilarious!

Nah.  He's just trying to see whether there is any limit at all to what will elicit a response from others.  I suspect he won't stop until literally no one responds.  Fortunately for him, and unfortunately to others of us, there appears no danger of that happening.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on November 25, 2011, 01:32:56 pm
Shaking my head...The guy has lost his bonkers
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on November 25, 2011, 01:38:01 pm
C'mon, how hard is it to just scroll on by when you see...

Quote
Jes Beard
Re: On the Farm
« Reply #3796 on: Today at 01:35:00 pm
You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.
?

I mean, I know it's hard to not look, sort of like a car wreck.  Stay strong.  I've had my moments of weakness, too, but it never turns out well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 25, 2011, 01:52:58 pm
It certainly does depend upon how you define success.  Most of the teams in the new leagues went bankrupt, and the league as a whole was absorbed into the old league.  Certainly for the teams that went bankrupt, it was not a success.

And most business enterprises cease to operate within five years.

In the case of the ABA, it had at least 39 teams (though many were successor organizations or may even have been the same organization simply changing its name) come and go in its ten year history, including at least three different cities in which the ABA offered three or more different teams, not more than one team at a time, but with one team replacing the other, and with new ownership continuing to be on hand to step in to operate a franchise.  Ultimately, of the seven teams existing at the time of the merger, four were absorbed into the NBA and three others folded as part of the agreement.

In the case of the AFL, the league started with 10 teams, and 10 years later it merged with the NFL, bringing ten teams along.  I may be wrong, but I believe they were even the same 10 teams.

The ABA may have had mixed success, but the AFL would seem to have been a rousing success.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 25, 2011, 01:56:46 pm
But you mentioned BOTH as examples of success.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 25, 2011, 01:59:03 pm
And they were.  You can not have a "mixed success" without success being in there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 25, 2011, 02:21:34 pm
Nor can you have "mixed success" without failure being in there.
Title: 10 Cub catchers to keep an eye on
Post by: dallen7908 on November 25, 2011, 05:58:47 pm
------------------------CATCHERS-------------------------------------------
16-01: C Welington Castillo 5'10" 210 Lbs R/R (198704) [2006-DO] {31:1.17}
0.286/0.351/0.524 in 251 PCL PA. 57/20 K/W.   
[2011 Cubs BA17, BP14] [2012 Cubs BA06] Best defensive C in system (BA2012)
   
27-02: C/1B Steve Clevenger 6'0" 195 Lbs L/R (198604)[2006-07, Chipola JC] {25:1.24}
0.295/0.363/0.449 in 351 SL PA(39/35K/W). 0.407/0.454/0.570 in 97 PCL PA(7/9 K/W).     

68-03: C Neftali Rosario R/R 5'11" 193 lbs (199307) [2011-06, Puerto Rico] {16:1.60}
0.294/0.351/0.490 in 102 AZL AB.  28/6 K/W.
Plus arm. Power potential.  K/W so-so. Receiving skills need work. K's too much

75-04: C Micah Gibbs 5'11" 223 Lb B/R (198807) [2009-03, LSU] {114:-0.33}
0.245/0.355/0.317. 69/49 K/W. Strong arm.  Walks a bit.
Best receiver in system.  Scouts say he could develop power but no sign of it yet.

80-05: C Mark Malave 6'1" 200 Lb S/R (1994??) [2011-VZ] Highly regarded but too young to get a read on yet
Plus arm with quick release.  Average athlete. Better looking swing from left side (so far)

104-06: C Justin Marra 5'11" 180 Lbs L/R (199301) [2011-15, Toronto HS]. 
Good receiver with solid arm.
     
106-07: C Rafael Lopez 5'9" 190 Lbs L/R (198710) [2011-16, FSU] {128:-0.59}
0.316/0.381/0.449 in 223 NWL PA. 27/21 K/W. 
Senior sign: Threw out 42% of stealers at FSU in spring 2011.

121-08: C Sergio Burruel 5'11" 210 Lb L/R (199107) [2009-19, AZ HS] {75:0.51}
0.203/0.325/0.244 in 207 MWL PA. Young for his level, but low avg and no power   
   
134-09: C Yaniel Cabeza 5'11" 185 Lbs R/R (198904) (2010-Cuba, $550K) {151:-1.66}
0.201/0.279/0.262 in 183 NWL PA 15/15 K/W 2-5 SB. 
Defensive standout with weak bat.

143-10: C Alberto Mineo 5'11" 165 Lbs L/R (199307) (2010-Italy, $225K)
LHH? Europe's top prospect in 2010. Catch-and-throw guy with solid flat swing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 25, 2011, 06:07:09 pm
My understanding of Castillo is that although he has the best catcher's arm in the system, he isn't a particularly good defensive catcher in most other respects.

I notice that you don't have Brenley's kid listed.  I have no idea where he would be rated, but probably somewhere above Burruel.  The other would be Louis Flores, who has probably spent enough time on the suspended list to kill his prospect rating.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 25, 2011, 07:22:12 pm
I notice that you don't have Brenley's kid listed.  I have no idea where he would be rated, but probably somewhere above Burruel.

Man.  Burruel must be really, really bad.

Brenley just turned 25 last month, and spent the entire season repeating at high A in Daytona.  He hit .206   with an OBP of .248 and an OPS of .496.  That is not the profile of a prospect.  That is the profile of someone who is on the minor league roster only because they have to have someone catching the game.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 25, 2011, 07:40:31 pm
Once again, a problem with definitions.  The lists posted cover more than one hundred minor league players.  I suspect that a case could be made that the Cubs do not have one hundred and forty three minor league players that are better than Brenley.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 25, 2011, 07:44:51 pm
Even in the Cubs system, that would be one weak, weak case.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 25, 2011, 08:06:29 pm
Once again, a problem with definitions.  The lists posted cover more than one hundred minor league players.  I suspect that a case could be made that the Cubs do not have one hundred and forty three minor league players that are better than Brenley.

I'm not seeing a problem with definitions here.

You wrote, "I notice that you don't have Brenley's kid listed.  I have no idea where he would be rated, but probably somewhere above Burruel."

That was what I was commenting on.  I had never heard of Burruel before and had not heard much of anything about Brenley's son, so I checked the stats.

Your quote indicates you believe Brenley "would be rated... probably somewhere above Burruel."  My comment was not really whether either of them are or are not real prospects, but merely which one of them, however limited their chances might be, should be rated higher.  Burruel may not have had a strong season in 2011, but Brenley was just brutal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 25, 2011, 10:07:12 pm
On the other hand, Brenley is an excellent defensive catcher, while Burreul is a poor defensive catcher.

And, of course, Burruel was equally brutal on offense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 26, 2011, 08:34:20 am
Very interesting Josh Vitters analysis

Quote
"He's been the youngest player in every league he has played in," said Gary Hughes, who was the Cubs' assistant general manager until he resigned in August. "I think we definitely saw him take some strides this year."

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/vitters-328684-year-league.html (http://www.ocregister.com/articles/vitters-328684-year-league.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 26, 2011, 09:43:40 am
DaveP: Why do you believe Burruel is a brutal fielder? I believe he threw out a slightly higher percentage of basestealers than Brenly and had only one more passed ball.  Is he a poor "receiver"?  I imagine Burruel will have to fight off challenges from Lopez and Cabeza for playing time next year.  If he is truly a bad fielder he could be cut this spring. 

I think you may be right that I under-rated Brenly.   He was selected as a midseason all star in the FSL this year and a postseason all star at the end of last year. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 26, 2011, 10:10:07 am
Dallen - I have heard reports that Burruel was very poor when it comes to blocking balls in the plate.  I have never seen him myself.

Catcher is the worst position to evaluate defensively using stats.  Pitches that hit the dirt are usually called wild pitches, even though good catchers are expected to block them, and many do.  That is why Castillo, who has an outstanding arm, is considered by many to be a rather poor defensive catcher.

I didn't intend to be critical of your ratings.  There is usually very little difference between the number 50 prospect and the number 150 prospect in any system.  It just occurred to me that you might have overlooked Brenly when you made your list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 26, 2011, 01:21:46 pm
"He's been the youngest player in every league he has played in," said Gary Hughes.

Cactus, I know that is not your quote, but Hughes' quote, but it is more than mildly inaccurate.

Last year (2010), Vitters was not even the youngest player who played for the Smokies, let alone being the youngest in his league.  Castro is about 8 months younger than Vitters and Castro started the season with the Smokies.  This year (2011) Ramon Garcia, Jae-Hoon Ha, and Kyung-Min Na were all younger players than Vitters on the Smokies, and that is just looking at the team Vitters was with, not even looking at the entire league.

Hopefully Vitters will still pan out, and he is not yet old for his league, but the "youngest player in his league" stuff, even if it was once true, has not been true for a while.  (Even if Hughes were to argue it was still accurate that when Vitters came up to Tennessee in 2010 he was the youngest player in the Southern League because Castro was then in the majors, it would still be inaccurate, because Brett Lawrie, with Huntsville, the first other team I looked at, was with Huntsville in the same league all season and is about five months younger than Vitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 26, 2011, 05:10:43 pm

------------------------FIRSTBASEMEN-------------------------------------------
11-01: 1B Dan Vogelbach 6'0" 240 Lb LHH (199212) [2011-02, FL HS]
Best LH power in 2011 draft but is more than a masher. Could also hit for avg. Patient.
[2012 Cubs BA10]

41-02: 1B/LF Rebel Ridling 6'4" 230 Lbs R/R (198605) [2008-25, OkSt] {29-1.20}
0.309/0.372/0.515 in SL. SL Mid-season all star

51-03: 1B Justin Bour 6'4" 250 Lbs L/R (198805) [2009-25, GMU] {40-1.03}   
0.277/0.335/0.478 in 502 FSL AB (105K's). Selected to 2011 FSL postseason allstar team
0.464(0.935) OPS in 132(370) AB vs. LH(RH) pitchers. 

87-04: 1B Richard Jones 6'0" 215 Lbs L/R (198801) [2009-09,The Citadel] {55:0.80} 
0.309/0.362/0.538(24 HR) in MWL (472 AB). 125/32 K/W. 0 SB.  0.960 OPS vs. RHP.
Much too old for level, but did hit 0.331 with 13HR in 67 games after mid-season break.     
   
97-05: 1B Trevor Gretzky 6'4" 190 Lbs [2011-07, CA HS]
Projects to hit for power.  Already a below-average runner.  Needs to work on defense.
   
112-06: 1B Paul Hoilman 6'4" 240 Lbs R/R (198902) [2011-19] {113:-0.30} 
0.252/0.383/0.512 in 295 NWL PA (17 HR) 105/49 K/W.
Sr. sign. Masher, many HR but even more Ks.
 
126-07: 1B/LF Ryan Cuneo 6'3" 190 Lb L/R (198810) [2010-20] {73:0.53}
0.347/0.427/0.720 in 89 NWL PA. 0.263/0.315/0.379 in 219 MWL AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 26, 2011, 05:32:04 pm
LaHair is not even on the list?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 26, 2011, 10:40:47 pm
LaHair will not be a rookie, so I suppose it is reasonable to not put him on prospect lists.  If we were to put him on the list, I would rank him below Vogelbach in potential, and ahead of all the rest.  Since a case can be made that LaHair, being much much closer to the majors, should be listed as the number one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 26, 2011, 10:43:40 pm
ArizonaPhil

Pitchers Marco Carrillo and Justin Berg will be back in the Cubs 0rganization next year, as two more post-2011 Rule 55 Minor League Free-Agents have re-signed with the Cubs.

The two pitchers join OF Jim Adduci and INF Jonathon Mota, who re-signed with the Cubs earlier this month. Two other Cubs minor league free-agents (OF Brad Snyder and INF Scott Moore) have signed 2012 minor league contracts with the Houston Astros.

So far, the Cubs have not signed any minor league free-agents from outside the organization.


While Berg will be spending most of 2012 rehabbing from TJS at Fitch Park, Carrillo should have a decent shot at making the AAA Iowa Cubs roster as a rubber-armed "swing-man" (starter/reliever). The 24-year old Carrillo is presently pitching for Obregon in the Mexican Pacfic League (LMP), and is 3rd in the league in ERA among starting pitchers.

Like Adduci and Mota, both Berg and Carrillo will be eligible for selection in next month's Rule 5 Draft. (Free-agents who sign minor league contracts prior to the Rule 5 Draft are eligible for selection).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on November 27, 2011, 03:00:50 am
Not sure where he will have the defense to play, but I still think Vitters will have an above average bat the major league level...I won't call him top 3 on my prospect list, but if he isn't, he is very close.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 27, 2011, 09:30:36 am
Ray: Isn't that the problem with this system.  We have perhaps ten candidates for the third spot on the prospect list.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 27, 2011, 12:31:11 pm
Ray: Isn't that the problem with this system.  We have perhaps ten candidates for the third spot on the prospect list.

Having ten candidates is better than having none. There's a dearth of "can't miss" prospects in the Cubs' farm system, but there is depth. Even "can't miss" prospects do (example: Corey Patterson).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 27, 2011, 02:13:16 pm
And those about whom there are serious questions end up doing quite well.

Pete Rose, Greg Maddux and Albert Pujols being three examples.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 27, 2011, 05:19:27 pm
------------------------SECONDBASEMEN-------------------------------------------
21-01: 2B/3B/SS/LF/RF Ryan Flaherty 6'3" 220 Lbs L/R (198607) [2008-01s, Vanderbilt] {48-0.88}   
0.305/0.384/0.523 in 344 SL PA(55/40K/W).  0.237/0.277/0.399 in 186 PCL PA(44/10K/W). 
[2011 Cubs BA22] 
   
24-02: 2B/SS/LF Logan Watkins 5'11" 170 LB (198908) [2008-21, KS HS] {27:1.23}   
0.281/0.352/0.404 in 441 FSL AB. Increased XBH from 24 to 32 (2010to2011).   
[2011 Cubs BA25] 

25-03: 2B/CF Zeke DeVoss 5'10" 175 Lb S/R (199007) [2011-03, U of Miami] {50-0.87} NWL#17
Patient hitter with well above-average speed.  Should develop gap power.  Defense concerns could cause fulltime move to OF.

83-04: 2B/CF/LF Rubi Silva 5'11" 180 Lb L/R (198906) [2010, Cuba, $1Mill] {79:0.32}
0.300/0.319/0.400 in 416 MWL PA. 0.229/0.250/0.362 in 112 FSL PA.
Above-avg speed, strong arm, aggressive approach, and line-drive swing

127-05: 2B/SS/3B Nate Samson 6'1" 190 Lbs R/R (198708) {76:0.42}
0.236/0.302/0.373 in 309 SL PA. 43/22 K/W.
   
128-06: 2B Pierre LePage 5'8" 168 Lbs R/R (198902) [2010-13, UCONN] {83:0.29}
0.252/0.316/0.357 in 267 MWL PA. 20/20 K/W. 8-10 in SB.
     
148-07: 2B Brain Inoa 5'10" 170 Lbs B/R (199202) {104:-0.08}
0.282/0.338/0.408 in AZL
 
154-08: 2B/SS/3B Brad Zapenas 6'3" 185 Lbs R/R (198912) [2011-42] {134:-0.86} 
0.238/0.312/0.338 in 179 NWL PA. 9-9 SB 28/13 K/W.
 
156-09: 2B/SS/3B Kenny Socorro 5'9" 175 Lbs R/R (198906) (2011-44) {141:-1.29}
0.248/0.288/0.291 in 125 PA(81 in NWL & 40 in MWL). 11/7 K/W 
 
159-10: 2B/3B/SS Antonio Gonzalez 5'10" 170 Lbs B/R (199401) (2010-DO)
0.214/0.350/0.319 in 203 DSL PA. 11-21 SB. 47/35 K/W.
So-so tools but good baseball instincts and solid fielder.

2B/1B/3B Jeffrey Puente 5'10" 170 Lbs L/R (199204)
0.231/0.379/0.390 in 221 DSL PA. 45/39 K/W 11-13 SB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 27, 2011, 08:18:58 pm
Dallen - did you put Amaya at shortstop or third base?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 27, 2011, 08:27:43 pm
ArizonaPhil

JUMBO: Welington Castilo has only one minor league option left, and he probably could use another year at AAA to work on polishing his below-average receiving skills.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 27, 2011, 08:31:09 pm
ArizonaPhil

No player looked worse at Instructs (both offensively and defensively) than Neftali Rosario. I would be surprised if Rosario gets to Peoria in 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 28, 2011, 08:12:07 am
Cubs outfielder Lou Montanez elected free agency after recently being outrighted off of the club's 40-man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 28, 2011, 08:36:40 am
Cubs outfielder Lou Montanez elected free agency after recently being outrighted off of the club's 40-man roster.

Mistakes like this by the Theocracy are going to come back to haunt them....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on November 28, 2011, 09:09:49 am
Cubs outfielder Lou Montanez elected free agency after recently being outrighted off of the club's 40-man roster.

Oh no, who will take his place?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on November 28, 2011, 09:13:45 am
Corey Patterson
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 28, 2011, 02:26:51 pm
Davep: For positions, I simply put players at the position they appeared at most in 2011.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 28, 2011, 02:31:20 pm
I guess that was my question.  What position did he appear most in 2011?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 28, 2011, 02:42:48 pm
Most games at 3B.  Most chances at 2B.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=amaya-001gio
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 28, 2011, 02:52:11 pm
Thanks, Jeff.  Looks like pretty equal experience at all three positions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 28, 2011, 03:01:38 pm
I'm sure Craig will enjoy commenting on the relatively uncommon nature of a player at any level posting a batting average of .377 over a 227 PA sample while hitting no home runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 28, 2011, 06:59:30 pm
Davep: Sorry for the obtuse answer.

------------------------THIRDBASEMEN-------------------------------------------
03-01: 3B/1B Josh Vitters 6'2" 200 Lbs R/R (198908) [2007-01, Cal HS] {03-2.12}
0.283/0.322/0.448 in AA 54/22 K/W
[2011 Cubs BA05, BP04, 2012CubsBA09] 

07-02: 3B/2B/SS D.J. Lemahieu   6'4" 205 Lbs R/R (198807) [2009-02, Mich HS] {08-1.90}
0.358/0.386/0.492 in 187 SL AB. 0.286/0.328/0.366 in 227 PCL AB. 9SB/8SB.
[2011 Cubs BA13]  Tweener?

08-03: 3B Jeimer Candelario 6'0" 185 Lb B/R (199311)
0.337/0.443/0.478 in DSL 42/50 K/W
Tremendous DSL numbers.  Projects to hit for avg and power.  Classic swing from leftside.

20-04: 3B/2B Matt Cerda 5'9" 165 Lb L/R  (199006) [2008-04, Cal HS] {09:1.90}
0.283/0.394/0.357 in 389 FSL AB.  7SB&7CS.   71/71 K/W. 
[2011 Cubs BA31] 

26-05: 3B/SS/2B Gioskar Amaya: 5'11" 175 lb R/R MI (199212) [2009-VZ] {01:2.37}
Impressive 0.377/0.417/0.510 in AZL as 18 yr old. BA AZL#9. 1HR in last two years; Tweener? 

69-06: 3B/1B Dustin Geiger 6'2" 180 Lbs R/R (199112) {33:1.12} [2010-24, Fl HS]
0.342/0.366/0.582 in 82 PA in AZL. 0.227/0.268/0.319 in 180 PA at Peoria

86-07: 3B/1B/LF Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE] {86:0.20} $850K bonus in 2009
Spent 2010 in DSL.  0.261/0.305/0.347 in 239 NWL PA. In 2010 missed 50G due to PEDS. 
   
90-08: 3B/RF/LF Ricardo Marcano 6'2" 180 Lb L/R (1994??) [2011-VZ].
BA#30 Top International Prospect (by expected bonus)
Projects to hit for average & power.  Average speed and hands.

96-09: 3B/2B Marquez Smith 5'10: 205 Lbs R/R (198503) [2007-08, Clemson]{103:-0.08}
0.278/0.344/0.441 in 292 PCL PA. 61/23 K/W.  Were nagging injuries cause of his disappointing season?
[2011 BP13] 
 
99-10: 3B/1B/LF Greg Rohan 6'0" 205 Lbs R/R (198605) [2009-21,Kent St] {88:0.14} 
0.314/0.368/0.433 in 327 MWL PA. 0.345/0.403/0.593 in 125 FSL PA. 
Much too old for MWL, he continued to excel after promotion to FSL. 

144-12: 3B/RF Gregori Gonzalez 5'9" 170 Lbs R/R (198907) {101:-0.04} 
Good season but way too old. 0.330/0.355/0.530 in AZL. 19/4 K/W.

155-12: 3B Dustin Harrington 5'11" 180 Lbs (198811) [2010-34] {138:-1.06}
0.301/0.339/0.359 in 110 NWL PA. 0.221/0.237/0.284 in 97 FSL PA.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 28, 2011, 07:13:49 pm
Dallen, Davep is Dutch.  Obtuse comes natural, both in expression and in comprehension.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 28, 2011, 07:15:07 pm
Curt - try not to interrupt when the big boys are talking.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on November 28, 2011, 07:19:47 pm
What other big boy was Dallen talking to?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 28, 2011, 07:25:40 pm
Curt - try not to interrupt when the big boys are talking.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on November 29, 2011, 08:10:56 am
http://www.northsidebaseball.com/articles/nsbb-features/63-feature-articles/7339-chat-with-baseball-americas-jim-callis
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on November 29, 2011, 09:01:48 am
Jeff, thanks for the Northside Baseball link...the Callis interview was interesting, as is the article about Geo Soto on the site.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on November 29, 2011, 12:12:51 pm
Fangraphs does the Cubs top prospects:

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/top-15-prospects-chicago-cubs/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on November 29, 2011, 12:18:28 pm
Meh, assessing Lee without mentioning defense or SB?  That makes a lot of sense.

MLB.com has Lee, Archer and Guyer as the #2, #3 and #6 prospects in the Rays' system.  And that's an elite farm system, not a third-tier one like the Cubs are currently sporting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on November 29, 2011, 09:09:13 pm
Tampa's system has been top notch, but they don't have as many top prospects in the system as they used to. Most are no longer eligible for consideration when doing these top prospects lists as their top tier guys are at the major league level already.

I know Lee has great speed and is a great SS. However, it's his bat that will or will not make us regret trading him. If his bat doesn't develop, he'll still be a regular SS, but not the all-star player he could be. I'll trade glove-first SS's for top of the rotation starters all day long.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 30, 2011, 06:46:28 pm
------------------------SHORTSTOPS-------------------------------------------
02-01: SS Javier Baez 6'1" 205 lbs R/R (199212) [2011-01, FL HS]
Fast powerful bat. Strong arm with average range.
[2012 Cubs BA02]
 
04-02: SS Junior Lake 6'3" 215 Lb R/R (199003) [2007-DO] {10:1.87} 109/19 K/W.
0.315/0.336/0.498 in 203 FSL AB.  0.248/0.300/0.380 in 242 SL AB.
Strong arm.  [2011 Cubs BA27, 2012 Cubs BA08] Best IF arm in system (BA2012)
 
18-03: SS/2B/3B Marco Hernandez S/R 6'0" 170 Lbs (199209) [] {13:1.82}
0.333/0.375/0.486 with 29/16 K/W in 210 AZL AB.  BA AZL#6. Solid fielder.

32-04: SS Marwin Gonzalez 6'1" 186 Lbs S/R (198903) [2005, VZ] {07:1.91} 
0.301/0.359/0.421 in 216 SL AB. 0.274/0.326/0.376 in 197 PCL AB. 7SB/3CS.
               
39-05: SS Carlos Penalver 6'0" 170 Lbs R/R (199405) [2010-VZ, $550K] 
0.272/0.364/0.341 in 311 DSL PA. 42/35 K/W 21-29 SB.
RHH with good bat speed and line drive stroke. Athletic.

65-06: SS/3B/OF Luis Enrique Acosta 6'1" 180 Lb R/R [2011-DO; $1.1M]
Solid hitter who uses entire field.  May end up a corner outfielder.
    
101-07: SS/2B/3B Jonathan Mota 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (198706) [2003-VZ] {53:0.82}
0.289/0.321/0.446 in 204 PCL AB. 0.221/0.250/0.351 in 77 SL AB.

110-08: SS/3B/2B Arismendy Alcantara 5'10" 160 Lb (199110) (2008-DO) {39:1.03}
0.271/0.303/0.352 in 369 MWL AB (76/16 K/W).

120-09: SS/2B Daniel Lockhart 5'11" 165 Lbs L/R (199211) [2011-10, GA HS]
Contact hitter with enough athleticism to stay in IF.
0.219/0.265/0.219 in 34 AZL PA. 7/2 K/W. 2-3 SB.

122-10: SS/2B Wes Darvill 6'2" 175 Lb L/R (199109) [2009-05, BCol HS] {91:0.11} 
0.256/0.346/0.318 in 256 NWL PA (good plate discipline)   

132-11: SS/2B/3B  Elliot Soto 5'9" 160 Lbs R/R (198908) [2010-15] {105:-0.12}
0.261/0.309/0.302 in 354 MWL PA. 0.309/0.345/0.333 in 91 FSL PA.
Diminutive utility player. Best defensive IF in system (BA2012)

138-12: SS Francisco Sanchez 6'2" 170 lb R/R (199312) Strong hands and easy swing.  Fringe-
avg runner with above-average arm.
0.191/0.299/0.328 in 204 DSL AB (67/25 K/W and 9-15 SB).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on November 30, 2011, 06:56:16 pm
Brjones:

Thanks for the fangraph list.  I was happy to see Austin Kirk on the list.  I have him quite a bit lower, but it would be great to have another left handed option for the rotation.

Also nice to see Zych so high. 




Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 01, 2011, 07:33:36 pm
------------------------LEFTFIELDERS-------------------------------------------
77-01: LF/CF Evan Crawford 6'1" 165 Lbs R/R (198808) [2009-09(Giants), Indiana U, for
Fontenot]{59:0.77}   0.307/0.362/0.401 in 446 FSL AB (32-38 in SB). 
Selected to 2011 FSL postseason allstar team

78-02: LF/RF Ty Wright 6'0" 200 Lbs R/R (198502) [2007-07] {69:0.63}
0.333/0.440/0.588 in 141 SL PA.  0.314/0.331/0.399 in 161 PCL PA.
Power and walks disappeared after promotion to PCL.

95-03: LF/RF/CF Jim Adduci 6'2" 210 Lbs L/L (198505) [2003-42(Marlins), IL HS] {96:0.04}
After spending 2010 in PCL, hit 0.308/0.379/0.430 in 267 SL PA. 33/26 K/W

114-04: LF/RF Eduardo Gonzalez 5'10" 170 Lb L/L (199202) [VZ] {52-0.83}
0.336/0.369/0.387 in AZL.   High avg slash hitter but few walks and no power.
So-so arm. 
     
119-05: LF Garrett Schlecht 6'2" 198 Lb LHH (199302) [2011-09, Illinois HS]
Quick left handed bat. Decent athlete with fringy speed and arm.

133-06: LF/RF Blair Springfield 5'11" 190 Lbs R/R (199102) [2009-07] {107:-0.13}
0.206/0.314/0.294 in 118 NWL PA. 0.333/0.381/0.513 in 42 AZL PA.
   
146-07: LF/RF Jesus Morelli 6'3" 180 Lbs R/R (199004) [VE] {126:-0.58}
0.244/0.281/0.267 in 97 MWL AB. 0.273/0.333/0.394 in 36 NWL PA. Spent time on
DL. 
 
153-08: LF: Dong-yub Kim 6'4" 200 Lbs R/R (199007) [Kor] {133:-0.84}
0.250/0.286/0.386 in 147 AZL PA. 12-13 SB. 38/4 K/W.   
 
LF Ben Klafczynski 6'3" 200 Lbs L/R (198809) [2011-20, Ken State] {145:-1.33} 
Undrafted as JR. 1st Team All-Mid-American Conference. Fringy to avg tools.
Displayed some power and good arm in college.  Not evident yet in pros.
0.221/0.274/0.312 IN NWL (85 AB) 0.243/0.307/0.283 in MWL (168 AB).
   
LF Mayke Reyes 6'0" 200 Lbs R/R (198704) Cuban defector
0.297/0.456/0.424 in 193 DSL PA. 23-36 in SB.  25/35 K/W
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 02, 2011, 06:56:12 pm
------------------------CENTERFIELDERS-------------------------------------------
01-01: CF Brett Jackson 6'2" 210 Lbs L/R (198808) [2009-01] {06-1.93} BA#38(2011)
0.256/0.373/0.443 in 297 SL PA. 0.297/0.388/0.551 in 215 PCL PA. 138 K's total.
[2011 Cubs BA02, 2012 Cubs BA01, BP01] 
     
06-02: CF/RF Matt Szczur 6'1" 195 Lb R/R (198907) [2010-05, Villanova] {30:1.18}
0.314/0.366/0.431 in 274 MWL AB.  0.260/0.283/0.410 in 173 FSL AB. 24 SB total.
[2011 Cubs BA07, 2012 Cubs BA03] Best athlete in system (BA2012)
             
12-03: CF Jae-Hoon Ha 6'1" 185 Lbs R/R (199010) [2008-KO] {04:2.01} Best def OF in system(BA2012)   
0.279/0.315/0.413 in 556 PA split between FSL(312)&SL(244). 67/23 K/W.
Power suffered a bit after promotion. 13 SB in 30 attempts. [2011 Cubs BA28] 
       
33-04: CF/LF Pin-Chieh Chen 6'1" 170 lb L/R (199107) (2009-TW) {43:0.96} NWL#14
0.301/0.363/0.424 in NWL.  Fleet footed line drive/contact
hitter with limited upside and an above average arm. 
 
55-05: CF/LF Kyung-Min Na 5'10" 170 Lbs L/L (199112) [2009-Korea] {24:1.18}
0.268/0.358/0.312 in 311 PA mostly split between AZL, MWL, & NWL 
10CS in 30 attempts despite plus speed.

56-06: CF/RF Oliver Zapata 5'9" 180 Lbs S/R (199209) [DO] {23:1.28}
0.324/0.453/0.431 in AZL (102 AB) but only 0.224/0.287/0.388 in NWL.
16SB in 24 attempts.

61-07: CF/LF Taiwan Easterling 5'11" 195 Lbs R/R (198902) [2011-27] {108:-0.l4}
0.277/0.305/0.361 in 179 MWL PA(32/8 K/W). 0.500/0.517/0.714 in 29 AZL PA.
Solid but unspectacular debut against mostly younger competition.  Looked good in instructionals
     
68-08: CF/RF Jeffrey Baez 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (199310) [VZ]
0.271/0.345/0.394 52/24 K/W 31/40 SB in DSL.
Athletic projectable body.  Plus-plus runner with average arm.
 
72-09: CF Darien (Trey) Martin 6'2" 188 Lbs R/R (199212) [2011-13] {NR}
Toolsy but raw. 0.243/0.289/0.357 in 76 AZL PA.

88-10: CF Shawon Dunston Jr. 6'2" 175 Lbs  L/R (199302) [2011-11, HS]
Above average runner who projects to be avg hitter with gap power. Pull hitter.
   
107-11: CF Kelvin Encarnacion 6'0" 175 Lbs S/R (199111)
0.296/0.396/0.426 in 66 DSL games. 35/35 K/W 28-36 SB.

CF/RF Elleser Bonne 6'2" 180 Lbs R/R (198702) [Cuba]
0.313/0.384/0.414 in 128 DSL AB. 22/13 K/W.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 03, 2011, 08:28:46 pm
------------------------------RIGHTFIELDERS---------------------------
22-01: RF Reggie Golden 5'10" 210 lbs (199110) [2010-02] {77:0.34} NWL#10
0.242/0.332/0.420 in 231 NWL AB.  68/28 K/W. [2011 Cubs BA23, BP08] 
"BA: Explosive power.  Solid RF arm. Will swing and miss a lot. Avg speed "

49-02: RF/LF Michael Burgess 5'11" 195 LB L/L (198810) [2007-1s, Nationals, FL HS Gorzellany trade]
{64:0.71} 0.225/0.323/0.427(20 HR) in 426 FSL AB. 111/60 K/W. 1 SB. 
[2011 BA19(Nats)].  Hit 0.263 with power after all star break. 

53-03: RF/LF Abner Abreu 6'3" 187 lbs (198910) [DO, for Fukodome]
Hit 0.244/0.293/0.360 in 93 Daytona PA after 0.244/0.294/0.429 in 363 Kinston PA.
   
79-04: RF Nelson Perez 6'3" 215 Lb (198711) L/R [DO] {57:0.79}   
0.327/0.370/0.505 in 108 FSL PA.  0.249/0.313/0.430 in 262 SL PA (2 SB combined)
Power remained but avg declined after promotion. 121 K's.
     
100-05:  RF Xavier Batista 6'3" 190 Lbs (199201) [DO]
0.259/0.371/0.472 in 256 DSL PA. 61/36 K/W 7-11 SB. Good power.

139-06: RF/LF/3B Anthony Giansanti 5'10" 190 Lbs (198809) [2009-49(Athletics)]
0.232/0.294/0.372 in 493 MWL AB. 80/34 K/W.
Best outfield arm in system (BA2012)

149-07: RF John Andreoli 6'1" 215 Lbs R/R (199006) [2011-17, UCONN]
Plus runner with questionable bat. Dad played briefly in NFL. Good fielder. 
 
160-08: RF/LF Delbis Arcila  6'3" 190 Lbs L/L(199304)
0.258/0.365/0.413 in 261 DSL PA. 7-11 SB. 52/36 K/W.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 04, 2011, 04:01:53 pm
Heh heh, that's quite the list for the RFers.  Michael Burgess as the 2nd best RFer?  Not a position of strength!   No wonder they were interested in the Cuban outfielders before the rules on foreign signings changed.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 08, 2011, 09:33:50 am
CarrieMuskat (https://twitter.com/#!/CarrieMuskat) Carrie Muskat

#Cubs (https://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23Cubs) select 3B Ricky Alvarez from #Angels (https://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23Angels) roster in AAA phase of Rule 5
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 08, 2011, 09:35:34 am
CarrieMuskat (https://twitter.com/#!/CarrieMuskat) Carrie Muskat

#Cubs (https://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23Cubs) lose IF Marwin Gonzalez to #Redsox (https://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23Redsox) in Rule 5
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on December 08, 2011, 10:49:28 am
Wow, Ron, if Marwin Gonzalez is all, I'd say we did VERY well!

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 08, 2011, 11:12:31 am
And Flaherty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on December 08, 2011, 12:14:16 pm
Losing Flaherty sucks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 08, 2011, 12:31:03 pm
Losing Flaherty sucks.

For the Red Sox to keep him via the Rule 5 draft, don't they also have to keep him on the major league roster for the entire season?  I can't see anyone thinking that would happen, which would make it likely he is part of the Theo compensation, and since Gonzalez is a 22-year-old AAA utility player with no power, the same is likely true for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on December 08, 2011, 12:39:58 pm
Flaherty went to the Orioles...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Coach on December 08, 2011, 01:53:33 pm
... which would make it likely he (Gonzalez) is part of the Theo compensation...

I get that thinking, but then again, why wouldn't the Cubs just have given Gonzalez to Boston without the machinations of the Rule 5?  Is their system so deep that it would have exposed other studs to being chosen?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 08, 2011, 02:22:12 pm
Flaherty went to the Orioles...

Then what do they intend to give up to keep him?  Or are they going to go so deep into a rebuilding mode that they intend to keep him on the roster all year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 08, 2011, 05:25:02 pm
These type of discussions are premature.  Flaherty and Gonzalez must clear major league waivers before they can be returned to the Cubs.  After clearing waivers they would become property of the Cubs again (assuming this would be the first time they have been taken off the 40) and could then be traded to the Orioles or Red Sox.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 08, 2011, 05:56:15 pm
Losing Flaherty sucks.

What tico said.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 08, 2011, 06:01:31 pm
Also, Marwin Gonzalez was traded from the Red Sox to the Astros.

http://tinyurl.com/77zqc82 (http://tinyurl.com/77zqc82)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 08, 2011, 09:00:37 pm
Also, Marwin Gonzalez was traded from the Red Sox to the Astros.

http://tinyurl.com/77zqc82 (http://tinyurl.com/77zqc82)

Now there is a club that might actually leave him on the roster the entire season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 08, 2011, 10:50:13 pm
What's the scouting on the kid we drafted?  I'm assuming he's got a very good arm, but isn't very close. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 08, 2011, 10:58:22 pm
What's the scouting on the kid we drafted?  I'm assuming he's got a very good arm, but isn't very close. 

"Converted outfielder, still raw" is what I read today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 08, 2011, 11:31:09 pm
DaveP,

You said one of the things you hated bout new administrations was they tend to undervalue what's already in farm.  With Flaherty lost for nothing, dj traded for really no upgrade if u ask me, etc, do u see this happening? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 09, 2011, 07:20:05 am
Sounded like some other team's Kyler Burke to me...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 09, 2011, 07:58:48 am
I'd think he'll have a good chance to make the roster. 

We're in pretty pure Buildican mode, and if they think he projects well, he'll have a shot.  Given that the competition at the back of the roster has been guys like Chris Carpenter, Mateo, etc., I don't think it's like he wouldn't have a shot. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 09, 2011, 11:18:33 am
DaveP,

You said one of the things you hated bout new administrations was they tend to undervalue what's already in farm.  With Flaherty lost for nothing, dj traded for really no upgrade if u ask me, etc, do u see this happening? 

Wid Mathews did it.  Dallas Green did it.  Just about every new GM does it.  Epstein and Hoyer are doing it.  You just have to hope that they do more good things than bad things.  I expect they will.

If they really rebuild the farm system as they say they will, I can live with losing LeMehieu.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 09, 2011, 11:38:18 am
Wid Mathews did it.  Dallas Green did it.  Just about every new GM does it.  Epstein and Hoyer are doing it.  You just have to hope that they do more good things than bad things.  I expect they will.

If they really rebuild the farm system as they say they will, I can live with losing LeMehieu.

but what about Flaherty in rule 5?  I just don't get it.  I had supposed maybe Red Sox claim him as part of compensation and we just include his rights as part of trade or however that works.  At worst, he is a fallback option for 3rd that might show something this year....I supposed I liked Flaherty more than most, but that is just one move i don't get.  he may have failed at the major league level, but there was the chance he didn't.

I don't like putting all the eggs in the Stewart basket.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 09, 2011, 11:52:17 am
I look at it this way - if Theo and Jed, with all their experience, advisors and extensive databases can't evaluate talent better than I could, the Cubs are doomed to failure anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 09, 2011, 12:27:26 pm
I look at it this way - if Theo and Jed, with all their experience, advisors and extensive databases can't evaluate talent better than I could, the Cubs are doomed to failure anyway.
What a silly notion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 09, 2011, 12:40:17 pm
So, is the compensation issue with Boston resolved, or do we still owe them something?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on December 09, 2011, 12:42:06 pm
We haven't given them anything, so it's safe to say we still owe them something.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on December 09, 2011, 04:08:46 pm
Reading behind the lines of Hoystein's quotes, the Cubs' farm system at the upper levels sucks.  So I'm not upset about losing Flaherty and LeMahieu.  Apparently both are roster fill at best.

Colvin may hit .260 with 25 to 30 homers at Colorado.  Or not.  No way would he do that at Wrigley Field.

I'm skeptical about Stewart, and don't think he's the answer at third base.  But that's why Hoystein are getting the big bucks.

And I'm not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 09, 2011, 04:32:45 pm
.254 with 20 HR's in roughly 350 ABs a few seasons ago

"No way" seems to be a reach...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 09, 2011, 06:03:46 pm
I don't like putting all the eggs in the Stewart basket.

Well, I'm not certain they view that basket as one which can't be changed.

But it may well indicate that the Theocracy is not expecting much of the eggs in 2012... which is a good sign to me.

I believe Stewart will be gone before the end of 2012 and the the Rockies will get much better production from what they got than the Cubs get from Stewart, but to the extent this trade indicates the Theocracy is in true rebuild mode and is not going to be concerned about the W/L record in 2012, I think the trade is very encouraging.

And for those dismissing my read as to what the trade means.... dismissing my read indicates you believe the Theocracy thinks putting Stewart at 3B really is the best move there to try to win games in 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 09, 2011, 08:19:39 pm
I believe that Theo thinks that putting Stewart at 3B is really the best move there to try to win games in 2012.

Taking into account budget restrictions, roster options and long term considerations.

And, of course, keeping open the opportunity to sign or trade for someone better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 09, 2011, 08:34:50 pm
Basket or no basket, Flaherty was an option in case Stewart failed miserably.  Sure, Flaherty may have fell on his face, too, but the more options the better and there really aren't any right now.  Something tells me they acquire another third basemen before camp, however I will admit Stewart is probably a better lottery ticket than the guys the Cubs gave up on.  Maybe they saw some kind of improvement out of Vitters in Arizona to want to give him a shot at a job, or to make the comfortable with him as a back up plan. Actually Jes, I would think you would have been in favor of letting Flaherty have a shot as its part of your master plan.

I guess I should trust theo and Hoyer, but losing him to rule 5 just seems like value lost when there are open spots on 40, and guys proven to be without value on it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 09, 2011, 08:57:01 pm
I believe that Theo thinks that putting Stewart at 3B is really the best move there to try to win games in 2012.

I suspect that it is more a matter of thinking it is the best way to put a warm body there who has an upside potential of being tolerable, and may reach that potential by mid-season.  Tolerable thirdbasemen who are cheap and are under team control still have value, particular at the trade deadline.  And they can bring some prospects who may have real value in a couple of years, but will do nothing to help a pennant contending team in the last couple of months of the season.

Actually Jes, I would think you would have been in favor of letting Flaherty have a shot as its part of your master plan.

I would likely have gone with either Flaherty or DJ at 3B about July 15th, and told ARam that they were going to play out the rest of the year there, though the team would accommodate him with a trade if he waived his NTC.  And without Stewart, yes, I would have liked to have seen one of them there in 2012, but what the two of them have done so far, it is reasonable to think that they would have little chance of reaching even the level of league average (tolerable) by mid-July and would therefore stand little chance of being turned for prospects with higher ceilings, and that league average would likely be the ceiling for each of them.

Stewart does have a much better chance of reaching league average well before either of them, and therefore might help them further build the team by using him to move at the trade deadline for high ceiling prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 09, 2011, 09:47:13 pm
Jes, say your a free agent 3b entering your prime. You have 2 comparable offers from teams with similar w/l outlooks in foreseeable future.  1 is from team A who has a reputation for treating their players with class.  The second is the Cubs team who in the last year or 2 has followed your suggestions on how to treat guys such as Ramirez, Soriano, etc.   I would ask who would you choose to sign with but I think better question would be by how much would Cubs have to outbid the other team to get ur services.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 09, 2011, 10:03:54 pm
Jes, say your a free agent 3b entering your prime. You have 2 comparable offers from teams with similar w/l outlooks in foreseeable future.  1 is from team A who has a reputation for treating their players with class.  The second is the Cubs team who in the last year or 2 has followed your suggestions on how to treat guys such as Ramirez, Soriano, etc.   I would ask who would you choose to sign with but I think better question would be by how much would Cubs have to outbid the other team to get ur services.

The Cubs are not a team which should be building its future with free agents, and much of the problem is that its only success in the last 8 seasons has been built on them.

If the approach I have suggested would discourage some FA from signing with the Cubs, that would not bother me in the least.  The Cubs should not be doing much in the FA market for a while, and all that I have encouraged is that the Cubs very candidly and directly deal with players in such a way as is best for the team, while also making clear to the players that if they did not like that use the team would be happy to trade them.

Much, much better than the Cubs putting Zambrano on the restricted list for getting pissed at himself and telling ATLANTA clubhouse personnel and no one in any position of authority with the Cubs that he was retiring.  Or the team's insistence in 2010 that he go in for anger counseling.  Or suspending Bradley in 2009.

Now those may or may not have been good moves for a team, but they likely were NOT moves that were going to make FA more likely to sign with the Cubs, particularly when with Zambrano you have a guy who has 10-5 rights and can not be traded without his approval and you have management talking about how HE is going to have to toe the line and is on a short leash..... management has nothing they can do with him.  Management is making itself look far worse in the eyes of any FA who might consider coming to the Cubs than the team would look using the approaches I have suggested.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 09, 2011, 11:00:00 pm
I think the Flaherty move reflects how little the Cub scouts think of Flaherty.  Rightly or wrongly. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 10, 2011, 12:10:40 am
My take is that the Cubs believed that they would not ,likely lose Flaherty in the draft, and of they did, that they would likely get him back at the end of spring training.  And that, if they don't get him back, they haven't lost a great deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 10, 2011, 01:33:21 am
We are going to eventually want to sign free agents tho, and a reputation is a reputation.  And I doubt any free agent doesn't sign because of those 2, as your using the actions of 2 nut jobs to make your point.  You don't think there is a difference in the eyes of free agents(including our own we may wish to resign some day) in Ramirez, Pena and Soriano than there is in Z, and Bradley?  I would say they see a great difference, because each guy knows that could be them getting that treatment one day.  I wouldnt blame a guy like Castro or Garza going to an organization they know would treat them with respect down the line when their contracts come up if we did some of the stuff you propose.  I also think it helps attract free agents if they know they will be treated with class.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 10, 2011, 07:42:28 am
Ray, in each of the cases which you think would have discouraged FA from signing with the Cubs, all I proposed was asking the players to allow trades and to use the guy in the manner which was actually most beneficial to the Cubs instead of playing someone because of their contract.  That is it.

Soriano at this point, based on his current performance and skills, is a 5th OFer.  He should be played and used that way, and I suspect that if he were played that way he would retire instead of being embarrassed by that kind of use.

ARam and Pena should have both been traded, but neither were, and in the case of ARam it was because he would not waive a NTC.  The Cubs were going nowhere, and playing him did nothing in the long term for the Cubs.  They should have played DJ or Flaherty at 3B just to see what either could do, and they should have made clear to ARam that was what they would do in order to give him the option of reconsidering his refusal to allow a trade.  And I don't see any FA being discouraged to sign with the Cubs if they took the approach I suggested with Pena -- telling him before he accepted arbitration that the team offer of arbitration was solely for the purpose of getting a draft pick and that the team was going to go with LaHair in 2012, even if Pena accepted arbitration and broke camp with the Cubs.

Playing Soriano every day is not "treating him with class," but playing the contract.  And if NOT playing him when he stinks would discourage the next Soriano from signing with the Cubs.... I suspect that would be a good thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 10, 2011, 11:04:07 am
In general, no-trade clauses are bad for the team.  And the longer the contract, the worse they are.  My own opinion is that I would not include a no-trade clause in any contract longer than two years, and if it caused me to lose a potential free agent signing, so be it.

Build from within.

Along the same lines, when a player approached the 5 - 10 mark, I would be actively looking to trade him, again because the no-trade effect can be horrible for a team.

As far as a bad team signing a free agent just to fill seats, as long as the money coming in from the seats (and other revenue) exceeded the cost of the contract, the team would be idiotic not to do so.  Such a situation does not have a profound effect on the long term goal of producing a top team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 10, 2011, 11:21:49 am
Along the same lines, when a player approached the 5 - 10 mark, I would be actively looking to trade him, again because the no-trade effect can be horrible for a team.

And that was one of the biggest mistakes with Zambrano.  The Cubs let him reach 5-10 status, meaning regardless what the team might say about him, he is now in the driver's seat.


As far as a bad team signing a free agent just to fill seats, as long as the money coming in from the seats (and other revenue) exceeded the cost of the contract, the team would be idiotic not to do so.  Such a situation does not have a profound effect on the long term goal of producing a top team.

And I agree, so long as the signing is just to fill seats and the team doesn't get confused about that.  Some posters here, however, seem to think that if the Cubs do not make a serious effort to sign Fielder, that is an indication Ricketts is not serious about winning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on December 10, 2011, 11:39:15 am
Another thought on Stewart:  He's just keeping third base warm until Vitters is ready.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 10, 2011, 11:51:20 am
I'm starting to think we might have Dave Kelton playing 3B than we have Vitters helping the Cubs there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on December 10, 2011, 12:16:50 pm
Another thought on Stewart:  He's just keeping third base warm until Vitters is ready.

He's going to be keeping it warm for a long, long time, then.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 10, 2011, 12:42:46 pm
And I agree, so long as the signing is just to fill seats and the team doesn't get confused about that.

One of the worst mistakes in logic is assuming that any action must have only ONE purpose.

There is nothing wrong with signing a player that will not only fill seats for the next 2 years, but will also be a foundation for a winning team after that point.  Signing Fielder would not only sell seats next year, when fans have not reason to come other than to see him hit home runs, but would also give them a 29 year old first baseman in his prime in 2014, when the team might be poised to compete for the series.

Obviously, no player is worth an unlimited amount of money, and it is quite possible that the bidding for Fielder puts the cost beyond the value to the Cubs, either in money or in years.  Reading too much in a failure to sign him is as absurd as reading too much in their success in signing him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 10, 2011, 01:16:25 pm
I agree, Dave.  I think some people hear Theo talking about building a solid foundation in the minor leagues, gaining assets, and dealing from strength and, because of their agenda of having to be right, hear "RE-building."  I'm not sure I've heard Hoyer or Theo use that term.  I think they're realistic about chances of winning the division next year, but I doubt that they've thrown in the towel.  They're looking for their Ortiz (hope that Stewart isn't it), they're looking for some impact players, and they'll go for it...but not at the expense of raping their minors. 

A player like Fielder is essential, as is Darvish or one of the Cubans, or CJ (already signed elsewhere) because if you think the whole core or corp comes up at once, that's even a worse mistake.  The year that you're just one player like a Fielder away from winning it all, neither he nor anyone else like him is available.  And then the foundation begins to crumble because it didn't have any mortar anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on December 10, 2011, 01:45:41 pm
Obviously, no player is worth an unlimited amount of money, and it is quite possible that the bidding for Fielder puts the cost beyond the value to the Cubs, either in money or in years.  Reading too much in a failure to sign him is as absurd as reading too much in their success in signing him.

Yes, but reading too much into not attempting to sign him isn't the least bit absurd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 10, 2011, 02:05:36 pm
Free agents are going to be even more important (and expensive) with the new labor agreement.  Teams will no longer be able to "outspend" the competition in the manner that Boston did in the past.  Even the value of great scouting will be reduced because in the future, any prospect that you "discover" will have to be "posted", giving all teams warning that a prospect is in play.  So free agents are going to be even more important in the future in building a foundation, and that foundation will have to be built over time, since you can not rely on the free agent market to be able to supply your particular need in any specific year.  Anyone relying on the free agent market this year to fill a need at third base or shortstop would be in substantial trouble.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 10, 2011, 03:31:17 pm
One of the worst mistakes in logic is assuming that any action must have only ONE purpose.

An even bigger mistake in logic is to assume that opposition to any action is for only one reason, or that a stated reason is the only one.

Every high-priced long term FA contract I can think of, for position players and pitchers alike, even of young players in perfect condition who did not look like a walrus, has ended up being an albatross for the team signing it.  Even ARod's which was signed when when he was only 25 ended up a millstone for the Rangers.

dave, any FA contract includes a premium for the first few years, in part because those are the years when you are most likely to get the output resembling what the player has been producing, and even though the amount paid for the later years might even be more than in the first few years (because of backloading) those later years tend to simply pay for the production of the earlier years -- the real value of the later years at the time the contract is entered into is discounted.

If the Cubs want him as a draw for the next couple of years, sign him to a fat 3 year contract and let him re-enter FA, with the third year giving the Cubs and Fielder the opportunity to see if he would fit into future plans and renegotiate and extend.  But as much money as will be involved in the deal, this is one where it makes sense to keep the signing considerations relatively clear and un-muddied with blended goals in unknown years.

LaHair will be cheap, and can produce considerable trade chip value for continuing to build.  Fielder will be expensive, and still expensive 3-4 years from now when the team will hopefully be worthwhile, even as Fielder's talents and production start to decline, though his contract will then likely seriously limit the team's options to add needed pieces to put the team over the top just as the roster may warrant a serious dip into free agency.

Fielder would also totally block Vogelbach, who is the Cub prospect I am most looking forward to right now.

I am not going to rip my hair out if the Cubs sign Fielder.  It would be exciting to watch him for a couple of years, and then amusing to watch his weight hit 400 pounds and listen to fans complain about how terrible the signing was.

But my preference is definitely that the Cubs pass on him, and those who think failing to sign him would indicate Ricketts is not committed to winning seem a bit misguided.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 10, 2011, 03:50:44 pm
some people hear Theo talking about building a solid foundation in the minor leagues, gaining assets, and dealing from strength and, because of their agenda of having to be right, hear "RE-building."  I'm not sure I've heard Hoyer or Theo use that term.  I think they're realistic about chances of winning the division next year, but I doubt that they've thrown in the towel.  They're looking for their Ortiz...

If the theocracy has not thrown in the towel, they ought to.

Looking at what Theo did in Boston ignores what he started with there and here.

There he started with a strong farm system and a team which had just won 93 games and finished 2nd in the AL East, a team which had a Pythagorean of 8 more wins than they recorded on the field.

With the Cubs he starts with a farm system which doesn't have much beyond what they drafted this year, and which won 71 games, 22 fewer than the Red Sox had won.... and with a Pythagorean showing they actually should have won one game less than that.

The Red Sox in 2003 had six players who put up OPS+ numbers of 120 of better.  SIX.  Only two were FA signings, Mueller and Ortiz, both almost flukishly lucky signings, and Ortiz added a WAR of only 3 games.  The Cubs have how many players on their roster who present any real chance of putting up an OPS+ of 120 or better?  Castro?  He might, but he was only at 111 this year.  Soriano?  Possible if he discovers the Fountain of Youth.  Soto?  Possible, but in 2011 he had an OPS+ of only 96.  LaHair might -- he was at 140 in his September callup.

Thinking that Theo "turned around" the Red Sox in a season or two ignores that they were not a team which needed to be turned around.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: UK on December 10, 2011, 04:38:06 pm
They've improved by having the teams around them get worse, one thing I think we'll see is quantity this off-season rather than one big piece. They're trying to win to now without having to jeopardize winning later, when that is more likely than winning in '12. None of these contracts nor players traded away will cost the Cubs 5 years from now.

As much data and scouting reports as they have from 3 different sources (Cubs, Bos, SD), it's still not the same as far as seeing what they from a 1st hand perspective.

Jes is right that Boston is a whole different animal. If Theo has the same success with FA as he did with Boston in his 1st year, it might bring them to 75 wins and several career and comeback years could bring them to around .500 and maybe in a poor division it puts them in an odd position come July but it just isn't likely.

I just think they're trying to improve the club without allocating future resources which are more valuable then then now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 10, 2011, 05:18:55 pm
I expect Jed and Theo will take a long, hard look at some of the nontendered players next week. I think the 2012 Cubs coming out of spring training will show some incremental improvements over the current roster from cheaper free agents, waiver claims and minor trades. But I don't expect any major free agent signings.

The only major trade I see as likely would be Garza for two or more nearly-ready prospects, which would hurt in 2012 but help thereafter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 10, 2011, 06:08:04 pm
An even bigger mistake in logic is to assume that opposition to any action is for only one reason, or that a stated reason is the only one.

And yet you consistently create a false dilemma by indicating that a team must EITHER build only for the future, or fail to build for the future by taking the present into account.

A four year contract would not likely block Vogelbach, who is extremely unlikely to be ready to excel in the next 4 years, and would not only fill seats for the next two years, but also help to compete in 2014 and 2015, and position the team to resign him if he is still doing well and Vogelbach does not develop as hoped.  In the meantime, LaHair can back up Fielder at first as well as Soriano or whoever in the outfield.

I would prefer to not sign Fielder, unless they can get him for MUCH less than I expect, both money and years.    But it would not necessarily be a foolish thing to do, nor would it be an omen of a change in the philosophy of building a foundation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 10, 2011, 07:13:55 pm
dave, I have said I wouldn't mind the Cubs signing Fielder to a 3 year contract, and a 4th year is little different.  But for LaHair to get real value by the trade deadline, he needs to be playing close to every day, not as a backup.

But as to creating a false dilemma (or dichotomy), I really don't believe that I am.

Competing goals almost always end up being conflicting goals, and I want all attention focused on building a strong foundation which offers the best chance for the Cubs to become a Brave-like dominant team for more than a decade.  I don't want attention wasted on trying to win in 2012, or even being too concerned about attendance (and, yes, I do understand that teams always have to have some concern about attendance and maintaining a fan base).

Divided focus almost always results in a poorer outcome for both goals than would be achieved for either if it had gotten more attention.  And that is true with just about anything human beings attempt to do.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 10, 2011, 08:50:32 pm
Divided focus is a disaster if it causes you to lose millions of dollars.  And although that perhaps doesn't mean that much to you, especially since it isn't YOUR millions, I suspect that it means a lot to the owner.

If, in the process of signing Fielder, LaHair loses a little value, that is rather unimportant if it causes the team to increase value by ten times that much (and that assumes that LaHair actually increases rather than decreases in value through substantial playing time.  This is not a situation where the team has made the decision not to resign a player, and yet refused to trade him with 2 months to go.  Fielder is likely to have substantial value for the next 5 years, and as long as they do not give him a no-trade clause, the risk beyond money is rather slight.  I think that Cubs have a better chance to win the pennant at some point over the next 5 years with Fielder at first base than with Lahair at first base, even if LaHair turns out, as I suspect, to be a very good player.

I think you underestimate the ability of Epstein et al to work on more than one goal at a time.  If they are really unable to weigh two factors at the same time, rather than one, then there is no hope for us.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 10, 2011, 10:09:35 pm
The reason I'm ok with signing Fielder is his age. As some have noted teams are built incrementally. I'd rather sign the best young guys i can and fill what I can how I can than target weaknesses thru fa. Take the Falcons in Football. This year that signed Edwards as de cuz that's what they decided thry needed.  Last year was Dunta Robinson cuz they wanted a cb. If they had just signed the best players as they come up and they'd have Peppers(signed last year) and asomgua(sp)(signed this year). Unless you have an all star entrenched, sign the best young guys and improve incrementally.  Trade who they're replacing if they have value.

I had a point when I started this but don't remember it. Lol
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on December 11, 2011, 03:08:02 am
I don't see Fielder's contract as being a huge issue.  He's not a liability on defense like Soriano.  He's ALWAYS had a great OBP (career .390), unlike Soriano when we signed him.  I'd have no issue having a huge contract on the books for Fielder.  By all accounts, he's a hard worker and a good teammate.  There is zero first base prospects in the system (I guess Vogelbach is one, but he's years away).  And you're getting a guy whose in his prime, whose also a left handed bat.  The Cubs should go all in for him, regardless if the secondary motivation is winning (ie, the first being butts in the seats).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 11, 2011, 08:13:16 am
I think you underestimate the ability of Epstein et al to work on more than one goal at a time.  If they are really unable to weigh two factors at the same time, rather than one, then there is no hope for us.

There is no indication that Epstein et al have any ability to effectively work on more than one goal at a time, particularly when both are such demanding goals and both are at times in conflict with each other.  But there is a great deal of evidence, in nearly all endeavors, both with individuals and with large organizations, that anytime there is an effort to work on more than one major goal at the same time, the success of both tends to suffer, and the degree to which they tend to suffer will generally be compounded with the complexity of what is involved in reaching the goals and the degree to which the goals are either largely identical, merely compatible, are inconsistent or are downright in conflict with each other.

The goals of boosting attendance and winning games in a given season are often compatible enough to be close to identical.  The goal of building a long term winner and boosting attendance over the short term are often directly at odds with each other.

This board has often discussed how the conflicting goals of winning every game and of developing a team for the long term are such that managers on the field should be focused on winning games (and that is another reason I have said I believe the team should very clearly write off the won/loss record over two full seasons, with the manager clearly told that the goal was NOT winning every game, or even winning as many games as possible for the season, but was instead developing the team culture and developing the abilities and approaches of the individual players.

The conflict between current attendance and becoming a long-term, consistent power for a GM is even greater than the conflict for a manager in winning games now and developing the culture and personnel to win games in future years.

To the extent the Cubs make moves to either win as many games as possible or to boost attendance with roster decisions in 2012 and 2013, those are likely to be decisions which sacrifice to some degree the development of the team as a long-term power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 11, 2011, 08:45:11 am
Have you seen indication that Epstein does not have the ability to effectively have multiple goals?  I would say there is much more credence to the idea of him having that ability than not.

I don't understand why you couldn't just rank the goals in level of importance and follow that tree.  If a move violates a goal above it, then don't do it.  I would think it would be pretty simple to have more than 1 goal, and that most high achieving people would.  They just prioritize them.  I don't understand why that is so hard to believe as being possible.  They teach having goals to grade-schoolers.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on December 11, 2011, 08:53:17 am
If they don't get Fielder, or do something to improve this team substantially, they are about as bad as any team in the league.  They replaced Aramis and Fukudome with Ian Stewart and Dejesus.  That lineup is a joke.  You can say you don't want to build a team through free agency, but that's about the only route the Cubs have other than being bad for the next 5 years.  And as was mentioned, its not as if the money spent on FA is going to affect the money spent on the draft and international signings.  The latter is now, as far I understand, capped.  Which will, as was mentioned also, make building a team "the right way" that much more of a process.

At this point, you can either completely sell off everyone, Garza, Soriano, Zambrano .... and start from scratch, ie completely suck.  Or, you sign Fielder, acquire a few more starters, and hope for the best while you build "the right way." 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 11, 2011, 11:16:35 am
There is no indication that Epstein et al have any ability to effectively work on more than one goal at a time, particularly when both are such demanding goals and both are at times in conflict with each other.

That is one of the more silly statements you have made.  Every executive I have ever seen or heard of, including myself in a former life, constantly had to deal with dozens of goals simultaneously, with several of them being crucial to the success of the company, and those that get to the top do so because of their ability to do so.

The mark of a good executive is that he makes sure that conflicting goals do not negate each other.  You say that there is no evidence that Epstein can handle more than one goal at a time, but his performance in Boston is an example of that evidence.  He not only made Boston a constant competitor, but he also increased revenue substantially and built a great farm system, at the same time dealing actively in the free agent and trade markets.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 11, 2011, 12:00:27 pm
That is one of the more silly statements you have made.  Every executive I have ever seen or heard of, including myself in a former life, constantly had to deal with dozens of goals simultaneously, with several of them being crucial to the success of the company, and those that get to the top do so because of their ability to do so.

The mark of a good executive is that he makes sure that conflicting goals do not negate each other.  You say that there is no evidence that Epstein can handle more than one goal at a time, but his performance in Boston is an example of that evidence.  He not only made Boston a constant competitor, but he also increased revenue substantially and built a great farm system, at the same time dealing actively in the free agent and trade markets.


hahaha, I thought the exact same thing and was confused by his statement...i wasn't sure if he was just naive or or arguing to argue(obvious i guess), so that is why I just said that stuff of having a priority to each goal, etc.  I'm curious as to his answer now.  lol

Even the most low level guys have to manage goals for their company, etc. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 11, 2011, 12:31:23 pm
Ray, zip me an email or fix yours in your profile.  FischerOne@msn.com
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 11, 2011, 02:03:25 pm
Wow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 11, 2011, 02:05:04 pm
He not only made Boston a constant competitor....

In each of the five seasons before Theo became GM, Boston finished 2nd each season.

In the nine seasons after he became GM, Boston finished 3rd 3 times.

Boston was a "constant competitor" before Theo arrived on the scene.

And before Theo arrived he already had the nucleus of an extremely strong team.  The two significant position players he added for the 2003 season were FA signings who performed well better than anyone expected (Mueller and Ortiz).  While those were good moves, those were also extremely lucky moves.

He had nothing resembling the mess the Cubs present.  And hopefully building the foundation for the Cubs to become consistent winners for an extended period will be his only focus, without distraction by worrying about winning in 2012.  To the extent that 2012 takes his focus off the long term, the long term is likely to suffer.

Countless studies have shown that things as insignificant as carrying on a conversation divides the attention of a person driving a car enough that it appreciably increases the risk of an accident.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 11, 2011, 02:07:07 pm
And as was mentioned, its not as if the money spent on FA is going to affect the money spent on the draft and international signings.  The latter is now, as far I understand, capped.  Which will, as was mentioned also, make building a team "the right way" that much more of a process.

The "cap" can be exceeded, though there will be a punishment for doing so.  At the same time, if others appear intent on observing the cap, a team willing to accept the punishment might make quite a haul.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 11, 2011, 02:14:42 pm
Jes - I never said that Boston was bad before he came there, nor did I say that he would succeed with the Cubs.

I merely pointed out that while at Boston, he was able to be successful at achieving several goals at the same time, as has millions of executives and managers over the years.  Any person that is able to concentrate on only one goal at a time will soon fail at his job.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 11, 2011, 03:20:21 pm
Ray, zip me an email or fix yours in your profile.  FischerOne@msn.com

I sent you one.

Also fixed it in my profile...2 of the numbers were transposed on it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 11, 2011, 04:28:49 pm
Jes - I never said that Boston was bad before he came there, nor did I say that he would succeed with the Cubs.

Nor did I claim you said that.

You said Theo "made Boston a constant competitor."  I simply pointed out they were that before he arrived.  And with 3 3rd place finishes since he arrived, including 2006 when they finished 11 games out, a reasonable argument might not only be made that he did not MAKE them a "constant competitor, because they were that before he arrived (five straight years in 2nd), in one of those years under him (2006) they were not quite competitive.

Theo in Boston assumed control of a very strong team, got lucky with a couple of moves, had his team get lucky a couple of times in the playoffs, made some decent moves, did not scr*w anything up too badly until this past season, and looked like a genius.

Please don't get me wrong.  I am glad we got him (though I would have preferred Friedman), and expect him to do well with the Cubs if he remains focused on the real mission.  I simply do not quite see him as the wunderkind some seem to see him as being, and that includes doubting that he can do as well building the foundation for long term success if he divides his attention between trying to win now and also trying to build a long term dominant team.

Suggesting that he effectively handled multiple goals when in Boston ignores the depth of the difference of the tasks at hand with each team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 11, 2011, 06:00:09 pm
For a while there, I noticed that I wasn't seeing "You are ignoring this user" message all that often.   That's changed recently (understatement).   It seems clear that's because other people have been responding to Jes' apparently outrageous statements.  If people would learn not to feed the beast, he would not be so aggressive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 11, 2011, 06:05:13 pm
For a while there, I noticed that I wasn't seeing "You are ignoring this user" message all that often.   That's changed recently (understatement).   It seems clear that's because other people have been responding to Jes' apparently outrageous statements.  If people would learn not to feed the beast, he would not be so aggressive.
Agree but with one exception:  Nothing slows him down.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on December 11, 2011, 06:17:22 pm
It's quite possible that not everyone shares your distaste for him and the nature of this board (a free and open discussion forum on the Chicago Cubs) won't always run according to your tastes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 11, 2011, 06:55:54 pm
The fact remains that Theo accomplished more than one goal at a time.  He made money.  He won pennants.  He made trades.  He maintained a great farm system. 

All at the same time.  It seems that some CAN work on more than one goal at a time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 11, 2011, 08:47:52 pm
Dave, would you agree that the complexity of the tasks might play a role in whether someone can successfully pursue two goals at the same time as effectively as they can pursue one goal?

Would you agree that at times, not always, but at times, the goal of building the foundation for a team which is dominant for the long term will come in conflict, at least to some degree, with the goal of winning for the present, or the goal of filling seats at the present?

Would you agree that because of the relative conditions of the respective teams, the task Theo faces in Chicago is more demanding the the task he faced in Boston?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on December 11, 2011, 08:51:42 pm
I wonder if Numbnuts realizes that the work being done is not being undertaken by a single person.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 11, 2011, 09:30:59 pm
Dave, would you agree that the complexity of the tasks might play a role in whether someone can successfully pursue two goals at the same time as effectively as they can pursue one goal?

Would you agree that at times, not always, but at times, the goal of building the foundation for a team which is dominant for the long term will come in conflict, at least to some degree, with the goal of winning for the present, or the goal of filling seats at the present?

Would you agree that because of the relative conditions of the respective teams, the task Theo faces in Chicago is more demanding the the task he faced in Boston?

I certainly agree with all three statements.  For that reason, I am not as certain as some on this board, that Epstein will succeed.  Among other things, luck plays an important part of every action taken.

I am also certain, that it is not only impractical, but almost impossible to focus on one single aspect of a job to the exclusion of everything else.  When focusing on the future, you must also make sure that there IS a future.  Gutting the team and starting from scratch with no regard to the present and near term could easily result in the collapse of the entire system, or at least the Ricketts share in that system.

Nor is it necessary to do.  Modern executives are quite competent to focus on more than one goal at a time, and history is replete with managements that managed to survive the present while preparing on the future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on December 12, 2011, 01:07:58 pm
Quote
It's quite possible that not everyone shares your distaste for him and the nature of this board (a free and open discussion forum on the Chicago Cubs) won't always run according to your tastes.

How many times do you want to read his knee-jerk Extreme Buildican Diatribe?  Ten thousand?  A hundred thousand? 

I'm with Ron and Curt and wish that people would quit engaging him.  Is there a way to confine him to one topic?  Wouldn't that be peaceful?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on December 12, 2011, 01:18:30 pm
That's just it:  I don't read it.  I don't have to.  Nobody is making me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on December 12, 2011, 01:19:42 pm
That's what ignore is for.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on December 12, 2011, 01:31:41 pm
Right.  People put him on ignore and then they complain about the ignore message popping up!  I just don't get it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on December 12, 2011, 01:40:01 pm
I suspect that for Jes, letting him know that his ignore message bothers you is even more gratifying than you acknowledging what he actually says.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 12, 2011, 01:40:39 pm
I think the "how to respond to jes" discussion needs to go to Comments/Suggestions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on December 12, 2011, 01:51:43 pm
If I see the letters "jes" in any post, I skip it.  :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 12, 2011, 01:54:25 pm
As the person who made the comment that started this most recent string, I regret saying anything.  I only meant it as a public service to others who seemed to be getting frustrated in their discussions.  I have no complaint about "free discussion" whatsoever.  I'm quite happy with the Ignore function here - it satisfies my needs with respect to Jes and a few others just fine.  If people enjoy engaging in discussions with him, they should do so.  If people want to encourage him to do his thing, that's fine too.  Enjoy.  'Nuff said.


If more needs to be said on this matter, I agree with JR, that moving it to the Comments thread would seem appropriate.  I hope that suggestion doesn't offend anyone. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 12, 2011, 02:04:26 pm
I just encourage people to put him on Ignore if it bothers them that much.  We aren't going to censor anyone as long as that option is available.  I have him on Ignore, so does nearly 50% of the board.  Everyone has a right to post here.  Even Jes.

I'm on people's Ignore lists, too.  Once I realize that, I stop responding to them. 

***Oops, sorry.  I posted that before reading the rest of the messages.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on December 12, 2011, 02:13:52 pm
So what is Curt blathering on about now?  I have him on my ignore list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 12, 2011, 02:17:39 pm
It's blithering, not blathering.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on December 12, 2011, 02:27:32 pm
What is Curt blithering on about now?  I have him on my ignore list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on December 12, 2011, 02:31:54 pm
The definition of "blither" is "to blather".

blith·er (blr)
intr.v. blith·ered, blith·er·ing, blith·ers
To blather.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/blithering
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on December 12, 2011, 02:35:27 pm
It's blithering, not blathering.

I have Jes on ignore too but--with regard to Curt's post above--I will gladly undo the ignore function temporarily if Jes is willing to address the merits of the link below.

http://www.grammarist.com/usage/blather-blither/

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on December 12, 2011, 05:43:41 pm
I was the one who tried to move without even letting him know where we were moving to. But ignore works fine.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 12, 2011, 05:57:17 pm
I was the one who tried to move without even letting him know where we were moving to. But ignore works fine.
The only problem I have is when Jes has made the last post in the only topic with unread posts.  Do I go do something else or do I open the topic thinking somebody else might have made a new post before Jes?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 12, 2011, 06:44:27 pm
Yes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 12, 2011, 07:46:43 pm
The only problem I have is when Jes has made the last post in the only topic with unread posts.  Do I go do something else or do I open the topic thinking somebody else might have made a new post before Jes?

I have the same problem with CurtOne and DaveP.

But nobody tell them because they have me on ignore.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 12, 2011, 09:20:47 pm
I ignore no one, other than my wife.

And that has to be a manual operation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on December 16, 2011, 03:36:45 pm
Regarding the Rule 5 draft and the notion that Cubs might have been surprised that Flaherty was picked--below is an excerpt from John Manuel's piece in BA, mostly about the lack of enthusiasm about the Rule 5 at the winter meetings:

Top overall pick Rhiner Cruz got some pre-draft buzz, and it seemed like everyone assumed Cubs infielder Ryan Flaherty—drafted fourth by the Orioles—was gone. Flaherty has pedigree, as an ex-Vanderbilt star and 2008 supplemental first-round pick. He has reached Triple-A and has some offensive track record. His bat will have to carry him, but he's going to an Orioles team with many holes. He has a chance to be a second-division regular. But no one seemed that interested in the rest of the crop of players, which consisted largely of three groups—low-ceiling back-of-the-rotation starters, specialist relievers and spare parts for the bench.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 17, 2011, 11:04:22 am
I assumed he was gone as well; however, I saw a baseball america that did not list him as a likely selection. Despite the Cubs protestations, they must have known he was a possible if not likely selection. If the Cubs believed he could contribute at the major league level now or in the future they would have protected him.  They had several spots open. Clearly, their scouts believe he will not hit enough to carry his weak to average glove. 

The Orioles are excited to get him.  Dan Duquette mentioned his college pedigree, his 20 homers last year, his AAA experience, and his ability to play several positions. With Brian Roberts perpetually 10-days away, maybe he'll get a look at second.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 17, 2011, 11:22:05 am
I seem to remember a time when Brian Roberts to the Cubs was almost a sure thing. At least we didn't make that mistake.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 17, 2011, 11:59:45 am
Cubsin, curb your negativity.  Roberts beat the hell out of us the one series the Orioles came into town that year.  We would've finished only 17 games behind had it not been for Roberts.  Perspective, man, perspective.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 21, 2011, 12:50:32 pm
Jeremy Schaap says Bill Buckner will be the Cubs class A hitting coach. 

Probably at Daytona?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 21, 2011, 01:48:09 pm
Cubs name minor league managers and coaches

http://muskat.mlblogs.com/author/mlblogsmuskat1/


No mention of Bill Buckner
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 21, 2011, 01:52:25 pm
Brief bios of some of the above

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111221&content_id=26219088&vkey=pr_chc&c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 21, 2011, 01:53:52 pm

Bruce Miles
Cubs haven't announced hitting coach at Boise (A). Boston speculation on Bill Buckner appears on target. Bucknor lives in Idaho.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 21, 2011, 01:57:49 pm
Team/manager/pitching coach/hitting coach/athletic trainer

Iowa (AAA):  Dave Bialas/Mike Mason/Dave Keller /Nick Frangella

Tennessee (AA):  Buddy Bailey/Jeff Fassero/Mariano Duncan/Aaron Larson

Daytona (A):  Brian Harper/Marty Mason/Desi Wilson/Peter Fagan

Peoria (A): Casey Kopitzke/Tom Pratt/Barbaro Garbey/Shane Nelson

Boise (Short A): Mark Johnson/David Rosario/To be determined/Bob Grimes

Mesa (Rookie):  Bobby Mitchell/Frank Castillo and Rick Tronerud/Jason Dubois/Steve Melendez

Dominican-1 (Rookie):  Juan Cabreja/Anderson Tavares/Ricardo Medina and Leo Perez/Wilkin Perez

Dominican-2 (Rookie): Yudith Ozorio/Leo Hernandez/Franklin Blanco/Robert Jimenez
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 21, 2011, 01:59:42 pm
Pretty nice promotion for Jeff Fassero.

Looks like all the managers got a demotion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 21, 2011, 02:42:29 pm
Lee and Archer were ranked the #2 and #3 prospects in the Rays system by BA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on December 21, 2011, 03:38:49 pm
Jason Dubois is the hitting coach at Mesa.  Looks like he finally hung it up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on December 21, 2011, 04:08:07 pm
http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111203&content_id=26086118&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 21, 2011, 06:17:05 pm
Jeremy Schaap says Bill Buckner will be the Cubs class A hitting coach. 

Definitely a guy who would preach patience at the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 21, 2011, 06:18:44 pm
Jason Dubois is the hitting coach at Mesa.  Looks like he finally hung it up.

He turns 33 in March.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 22, 2011, 08:09:15 am
Fangraphs top 15 prospects

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/top-15-prospects-chicago-cubs/ (http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/top-15-prospects-chicago-cubs/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 22, 2011, 04:55:49 pm


Quote from: ESPN
Audits show Cubs' Class A affiliate losing money

Associated Press

PEORIA, Ill. -- A pair of audits shows the Chicago Cubs' Class A affiliate in Peoria is losing hundreds of thousands of dollars a season. One audit raises questions about the long-term ability of the team to continue.

The Journal-Star in Peoria (http://bit.ly/uQyQO5 (http://bit.ly/uQyQO5) ) reports that the Peoria Chiefs lost $848,000 in 2010 and $678,000 in 2009. Losses in both 2008 and 2007 topped $400,000.

The audits were filed with the Peoria County Supervisor of Assessment's Office as part of the Chiefs' appeal of the taxable value of its stadium.

One of the audits by the Clifton Gunderson accounting firm raises "substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern."

Team President Rocky Vonachen disputed that. He says the Chiefs have been hurt by the weak economy.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 23, 2011, 08:03:19 am
Quote from: CCO
About those prospect lists

So how do you know who is right? First of all, you need to take the lists as information, but with a grain of salt. Know that from about a quarter to about half the time they are wrong, and that better players than they have listed are lurking in the system. To find out who those players are, you have to do your own thinking. The CCO will provide you with the information through our coverage of the entire minor league system, including rookie and international leagues. An informed opinion is usually the best opinion.

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/12/cubsminors_1.php#more (http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2011/12/cubsminors_1.php#more)

Required reading for a few of us
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 23, 2011, 09:46:49 am
    Harry (NJ): Does the "little red machine", aka Ron Torreyes, get consideration in your top 30?

J.J. Cooper: You can't help but love Torreyes. His size will always be a question, but man he can hit, and he's solid defensively. If everything breaks right, he's an everyday second baseman. If it doesn't there are plenty of scouts who think he could handle SS and 3B well enough to be a useful utilityman.

Deywane (Memphis): Why did Ronald Torreyes miss the list?

J.J. Cooper: He didn't miss it by much, but it's a pretty deep Top 10. A lot of guys on here who are closer to the majors with pretty good track records. A year from now, he may be a Top 10 guy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 23, 2011, 09:47:19 am
Greg (ohio): Dave Sappelt get any consideration for the top 10, considering Drew Stubbs terrible offensive season

J.J. Cooper: He was considered, but it wasn't that close. Sappelt already is a big leaguer, and I think he'll have a big league career, but he can't play center field well enough to play it as a regular, and I don't think he'll hit enough to be a regular as a left fielder. With the Reds his problem is that Chris Heisey is simply better. Heisey can play center every day, Sappelt can't. Heisey runs better, has a better arm and has more power. Sappelt may have a better hit tool than Heisey, but even that is pretty close. He could end up being a fourth outfielder for either Cincinnati or someone else.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on December 23, 2011, 09:49:45 am
I Googled "Reds top prospects 2011" and the first couple of links had Torreyes in the middle of the top 10 after the Latos trade.  Don't know how reliable these sites are, but that's pretty exciting to get him in addition to Wood for 1 year of a reliever.

http://mlbdirt.com/2011/12/21/2012-cincinnati-reds-top-16-prospects/ (#6)

http://baseballinstinct.com/2011/12/19/16430cincinnati-reds-2012-top-10-prospects-list/ (#7)

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 23, 2011, 08:22:35 pm
Greg (ohio): Dave Sappelt get any consideration for the top 10, considering Drew Stubbs terrible offensive season

J.J. Cooper: He was considered, but it wasn't that close. Sappelt already is a big leaguer, and I think he'll have a big league career, but he can't play center field well enough to play it as a regular, and I don't think he'll hit enough to be a regular as a left fielder. With the Reds his problem is that Chris Heisey is simply better. Heisey can play center every day, Sappelt can't. Heisey runs better, has a better arm and has more power. Sappelt may have a better hit tool than Heisey, but even that is pretty close. He could end up being a fourth outfielder for either Cincinnati or someone else.

Sappelt is 5'9", never hit for power in the minors, stole a fair number of bases in the minors but was caught about 5 times for every 8 steals, and is not thought to have the range to play CF on a regular basis.

On the depth chart this would seem to put him behind DeJesus, Reed Johnson, Byrd, Soriano, Campana, and Brett Jackson.  And if you look at his minor league stats it is unlikely Sappelt is the kind of guy who would ever get much higher than that ever if the Cubs moved Soriano and Byrd.

I sure hope Torreyes ends up doing well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on December 24, 2011, 06:22:53 am
Sappelt seems like a 4th outfielder and Torreyes is 140 lbs?  Apparently he can hit, but doesn't walk at all, and at that size, most of his hits are singles. He's probably the only player that might have an impact. 

I understand the trade, I just don't care for another 2-4 years of absolute suckitude.  I would have prefered 1 top prospect for Marshall.  I'm surprised one of the better relievers in baseball, and a leftie to boot, could not get that.  Instead, it looks like the Cubs acquired depth in Wood and Sappelt, and a decent-to-good prospect.

Not all that exciting, and this trade, and the following deals of Marmol and Garza are about all the excitement we're likely to have from this team any time soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on December 24, 2011, 07:28:40 am
Apparently he can hit, but doesn't walk at all, and at that size, most of his hits are singles. He's probably the only player that might have an impact.

Two things...

1. When a guy is hitting .364 in his professional career, it's kind of hard to tell how good or bad he is at taking a walk.  So far, he's hitting everything in sight, so he doesn't need to walk.  But there's not really any reason to think he's up there just hacking at everything...he has struck out only 38 times in 705 career plate appearances...that's a 5.4% strikeout rate.  That's ridiculously low.  (As a side note, he has also walked 38 times in his career, so his K:BB ratio is 1 right now)

2. In 627 career AB, Torreyes has 38 doubles, 17 triples (!!), and 8 home runs.  He'll never be a big home run hitter, but he has pretty good extra base power...especially for a small 18 year old. 

Dustin Pedroia is the same height as Torreyes, but is about 40 pounds heavier.  It's unlikely Torreyes will ever be as good as Pedroia...but if he can put on some weight (which most players do between their 18th birthday and the time they reach the majors), it's not like it's unprecedented for a smaller middle infielder to be very good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 24, 2011, 10:18:56 am
Obviously Torreyes is the guy with the attention.  Pure hitters are hard to find, and Torreyes appears to have that gift.  Combined with promising 2B defense and the limited power requirements for the 2B position, that gifts give Torreyes a chance to become a really good regular 2B.  How good depends on how his power and patience develop. Hopefully both will end up anti-awful, perhaps even good.  List weights are often unchanged for Latin signees for years.  Even if he was 140 when signed, that doesn't mean he won't be built like an NFL halfback by the time he reaches Wrigley, and have enough strength to hit for some power.  I also think a guy with a small strike-zone, natural pitch recognition, and a real gift for contact is exactly the kind of player who in theory could implement advanced plate discipline theory.  Easier to wait for the right pitch to drive when you can recognize pitches, and if a 2-strike count isn't the kiss of death. 

Sappelt also appears to have that gift of hitting.  His AAA and AA numbers were .316 and .361, with .374 and .414 OBP, and .838 and .964 OPS.  Nothing exception support-wise:  doesn't steal well, doesn't walk a lot, doesn't have an incredible K rate, doesn't have much power.  But nothing bad either:  K rate is pretty modest (in the low teens); his K/BB ratio is modest (a shade under 1.5:1), and his K/HR ratio is modest (a little under 5:1).   That's the recipe for a high-average hitter.  Sappelt's walk-rate in AA/AAA has been over 9%, so while that's not a big asset, it's not a drag either.  His combined AA/AAA OBP has been a shade over .390.  And his extra-base hit rate has been solid, again nothing special but not Barney/Theriot/Pierre-like by any means.  Seems like a good hitter.

Obviously you need to be a REALLY good hitter to be a valuable starter in LF, if you don't have power or any special defense.  But, there is also value in the anti-awful.  It's been suggested that Sappelt will have trouble getting past Soriano, Campana, DeJesus, etc. on the depth chart, and that may be true.  But I think it's not impossible that Sappelt could hit his way past all three of those guys.  If Sappelt can hit .300 with solid OBP and OK power, if he's OPS'd at .838 and .964 in AAA and AA, I think it's feasible that he might OPS near .800 in the majors.  Not certain, but possible.  I don't expect that Camana will often OPS at .800.  And Soriano himself has only OPS'd at .800 (.819) once in the last three years.  So while Sappelt's defense might not be good, it's almost certainly a good step anti-awful relative to Soriano, and replacing Soriano with a bat that hit .295-.350-.775, that's not that much of a stretch for Sappelt and is better than is probably for Soriano. 

I wonder how bad Sappelt would be in RF?  Might be a nice platoon guy for DeJesus. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 24, 2011, 11:25:27 am
Sappelt is not a bad defender according to last year's BA handbook.  BA does say he has a RF arm.  I don't think it would be defense keeping Sappelt from being a starting LF or RF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on December 24, 2011, 11:37:12 am
The conversation on Sappelt's defense is whether or not he's good enough for center. He would definitely be an asset defensively in LF, which only adds to his value compared to Soriano. As I said in another thread, if given the starting LF job, I wouldn't be surprised to see him outplay Soriano. That's more of a teatament to how poor Soriano has been than any measure of greatness on Sappelt's part. However, when you have the potential of league-average production for a position at league-minimum salary, that's an asset.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 24, 2011, 11:38:25 am
Sappelt is not a bad defender according to last year's BA handbook.  BA does say he has a RF arm.  I don't think it would be defense keeping Sappelt from being a starting LF or RF.

In 2009 BA rated Sappelt as the best defensive OFer in the Reds system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 24, 2011, 01:32:35 pm
Thanks for input on Sappelt's defense, Ron and JR and tico.  Sounds promising.  If he has the arm to play RF, and has good range for either corner, that sounds pretty promising.  Obviously like all of us I'm an optimist, and am looking for how things can work out to get better. 

The Cubs have had problems with guys whose non-OPS factors were generally mediocre.  As tico said, if Sappelt could have a playable OPS, it sounds like defense, baserunning, and alert play could be solid.  We'll see.  We're all fans and we all hope, and although we train ourselves to protect ourselves from it, I think we're all optimists at heart.  I'm optimistic and hopeful that Wood will be decent, that I'll end up liking Sappelt and maybe he'll end up surprising us and becoming a capable starter.   

Of course, I'm also well aware that the HR is the most efficient way to score runs, and a huge fraction of the runs that score in the National League come via the HR.  I don't know exactly, but my recall from some years back is that around half or more of the runs scored were via HR.  So while I know that not every useful corner player hits a lot of HR's, you can't build a championship offense without some serious HR power, and obviously neither Sappelt nor Torreyes is going to help us there. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on December 24, 2011, 01:51:52 pm
That's where Fielder comes in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on December 24, 2011, 02:20:22 pm
What I find interesting about Sappelt is the way his SB numbers have plummeted over the last couple of years - anyone have a clue as to why?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 24, 2011, 04:05:28 pm
I'm optimistic and hopeful that.... Sappelt (will) end up surprising us and becoming a capable starter.   

If Sappelt is going to be starting for the Cubs in 2012, it will be one gawd-awful season.

Look at the depth chart.

He is definitely behind DeJesus and Byrd, and Reed Johnson.  I might put him ahead of Soriano, but the reality is that is not going to happen.

That puts him as a 5th OFer, at best without great speed, not enough of a bat to make the roster as a hitter, and a glove only good enough to play CF in an emergency.  Campana may not offer anything much at the plate, but is a very good pinchrunner and clan play CF, meaning Campana is a better choice as 5th OFer.

If the Cubs trade ANY of DeJesus, Byrd, Johnson or Soriano, you would expect them to get an OFer either in return or from somewhere else, and then there is Brett Jackson who will likely be starting by the end of June.

Sappelt realistically is little more than an insurance policy which will be stashed at Iowa.... and not even a very good insurance policy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 24, 2011, 04:05:53 pm
What I find interesting about Sappelt is the way his SB numbers have plummeted over the last couple of years - anyone have a clue as to why?

Perhaps because someone explained that getting caught half as often as you steal is not very good, or managers figured that out and stopped giving him the green light.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 24, 2011, 05:44:29 pm
List weights are often unchanged for Latin signees for years.  Even if he was 140 when signed, that doesn't mean he won't be built like an NFL halfback by the time he reaches Wrigley...

But heights seldom change.

The guy is 5'9".

Other than Hank Stram with the old Kansas City Chiefs, I can't think of too many pro football coaches who used 5'9" halfbacks very often.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on December 24, 2011, 06:20:22 pm
Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith. Walter Payton was a giant at 5-10.  Of current starting NFL RB Ray Rice, Maurice Jones-Drew, Frank Gore are all 5-9 or under.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 24, 2011, 06:43:13 pm
Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith. Walter Payton was a giant at 5-10.  Of current starting NFL RB Ray Rice, Maurice Jones-Drew, Frank Gore are all 5-9 or under.

That's great.  When the National League gets that touch football league going, the Cubs are going to be one of the favorites with Jeff Samardzija and Matt Szczur and that Florida State receiver they drafted last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 24, 2011, 10:41:44 pm
Torreyes was 16 when he signed,  I suspect that quite a few boys grow taller after the age 16.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 24, 2011, 11:06:50 pm
Merry Christmas, guys.  Peace on earth, good will towards men.  Glory to God in the highest! 

Thanks for all the fun time and discussions shared.  I hope the year ahead is a good one, for each of us, personally, emotionally, physically, spiritually, and in every other way. 

And that the Cubs have a good and surprisingly refreshing season. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 25, 2011, 08:18:43 am
Merry Christmas, Craig.

And even Davep.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 25, 2011, 08:32:33 am
It's been suggested that Sappelt will be 5th on the depth chart behind Soriano, Byrd, DeJesus, and Johnson, and that with Campana's speed/CF ability that Sappelt won't even make the team.  That if he plays or starts in 2012, it will reflect a disaster season, and that he's unlikely to ever be more than a back-of-roster reserve, if that, given limited power, the absence of base-stealing speed, and the absence of CF defense. 

We'll see, and I completely understand that argument which is logical. 

But I'm not too preoccupied with the success of the 2012 season.  And I think that Sappelt's long-term value simply hinges on how well he'll hit.  Given his AA/AAA hitting, with BA well over .300 and OPS's well over .900 and .800, I think it's possible that he'll be a .300 hitter in the majors, with an OPS around .800 or close, and possibly somewhat over. 

If he can hit enough and OBP enough to support a long-term .800 big-league OPS, then he's a valuable guy long-term, starting or not.  That's a big "if"; big-league pitching is better, and batting averages and OPS's usually decline significantly in the majors.  So if he only OPS'd at .834 in AAA, he might not OPS near .800 in the majors.  But, he might, and that's the uncertainly game that comes with a rebuilding program.  You have to hope that some uncertain guys do work out successfully, even if not all. 

If he's OPS'ing at .800, hopefully you're so fortunate as to have two other corner OFers who are better, and he's on the bench.  Possible, some teams do, and it's possible that two out of the Soriano/Dejesus/Byrd/Johnson group will indeed do so.  But it's also possible that Soriano will be dumped before February arrives, and that any or all of those four players will end up well below .800 OPS this season.  It's also more than probable that most or all of those four veteran players will be gone before the Cubs win a championship, so that how good they are relative to Sappelt isn't very relevant to how much Sappelt might contribute to a contending team. 

I'm hoping his stats don't decline that badly in the majors, and that we'll just have a flat-out good hitter.  Without power, he's not going to be a .900-OPS guy, obviously.  But .800 or better is reasonably within the realm of plausible hope.  So I'll hope that until or unless he proves otherwise. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on December 25, 2011, 11:08:00 am
To me, Sappelt is no worse than the 3rd or 4th best major league outfielder in the organization right now.  Give him the playing time, and I think he'd be about the same player as Marlon Byrd.  If I'm trying to win this year, I'd have him penciled into the everyday lineup, because DeJesus is the only outfielder in the organization that is anywhere close to a lock to be more productive than him. 

I can't imagine this front office putting him behind a limited role player like Johnson or a 1 tool player like Campana on their depth chart. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 25, 2011, 11:24:07 am
My read on Sappelt is quite different. I see his ceiling as Marlon Byrd (a not-so-good CF with too litle power for LF or RF). As a prospect, he's behind Jackson, Szczur and Ha. I think he's a trading chip to somebody with a big ballpark, like San Diego or Los Angeles.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 25, 2011, 11:29:45 am
I'm in with Cubsin.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on December 25, 2011, 12:57:06 pm
Team/manager/pitching coach/hitting coach/athletic trainer

Iowa (AAA):  Dave Bialas/Mike Mason/Dave Keller /Nick Frangella

Tennessee (AA):  Buddy Bailey/Jeff Fassero/Mariano Duncan/Aaron Larson

Daytona (A):  Brian Harper/Marty Mason/Desi Wilson/Peter Fagan

Peoria (A): Casey Kopitzke/Tom Pratt/Barbaro Garbey/Shane Nelson

Boise (Short A): Mark Johnson/David Rosario/To be determined/Bob Grimes

Mesa (Rookie):  Bobby Mitchell/Frank Castillo and Rick Tronerud/Jason Dubois/Steve Melendez

Dominican-1 (Rookie):  Juan Cabreja/Anderson Tavares/Ricardo Medina and Leo Perez/Wilkin Perez

Dominican-2 (Rookie): Yudith Ozorio/Leo Hernandez/Franklin Blanco/Robert Jimenez
I've been unsuccessful trying to find out what happened to Von Joshua.  Anybody have any information?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 25, 2011, 01:17:31 pm
Torreyes was 16 when he signed,  I suspect that quite a few boys grow taller after the age 16.

While true, the folks who have seen Torreyes indicate he apparently is not one of them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 25, 2011, 01:26:56 pm
My read on Sappelt is quite different. I see his ceiling as Marlon Byrd (a not-so-good CF with too litle power for LF or RF). As a prospect, he's behind Jackson, Szczur and Ha. I think he's a trading chip to somebody with a big ballpark, like San Diego or Los Angeles.

Interesting.

Though all the scouting reports describe him as someone who can play CF, but only someone you would want there on an emergency basis, and even though the Reds only played him in CF 4 games last year, you read him as the equal of Byrd, who was an All-Star CFer in 2010, and even believe he will end up desirable to teams with big ballparks, where there would be a premium on having a speeding CFer with a good glove.

Anything other than wishful thinking that you base that on?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 25, 2011, 01:41:32 pm
I think Byrd (as a hitter) is a reasonable analogy, but I think the "good" Byrd.  And I think the good version of Byrd, who had OPS's of .814, .842, and .808 in back-to-back-to-back years, would be a valuable piece, even in a corner.  Heh, it's nice to envision a Cub team with so much talent that a guy who OPS'd in the .800's, played good defense, and was a good situational player, when we had so much talent that a guy like that was of little use. 

Of course, it's also possible that Sappelt might be like the recent .719-OPS version of Marlon Byrd.  In which case "useless" will be entirely appropriate. 

It all depends on how much the guy hits.  Who knows how much or little that will be at this point? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 25, 2011, 01:46:08 pm
To me, Sappelt is no worse than the 3rd or 4th best major league outfielder in the organization right now.  Give him the playing time, and I think he'd be about the same player as Marlon Byrd.  If I'm trying to win this year, I'd have him penciled into the everyday lineup, because DeJesus is the only outfielder in the organization that is anywhere close to a lock to be more productive than him. 

I can't imagine this front office putting him behind a limited role player like Johnson or a 1 tool player like Campana on their depth chart. 
My read on Sappelt is quite different. I see his ceiling as Marlon Byrd (a not-so-good CF with too litle power for LF or RF). As a prospect, he's behind Jackson, Szczur and Ha. I think he's a trading chip to somebody with a big ballpark, like San Diego or Los Angeles.
I'm in with Cubsin.

I'm with br.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 25, 2011, 01:53:40 pm
Craig, I don't dispute that at all.  I do dispute the idea that Byrd's "ceiling (is) a not-so-good CF with too litle power for LF or RF.)

The reason I dispute it is because it is not at all unreasonable to believe that an uninjured player's "ceiling" would at least be as good as what he had done two years earlier, when that prior year was not a career year (and in fact was the 4th best year of his career).

Do I expect Byrd to do that in 2012?  Probably not, though I would be quite surprised if he did nto do better in 2012 than Sappelt would.  I know you have commented on how well Sappelt hit in the minors, with his .834 OPS last year in AAA... but to put that performance in context, four other players with that Louisville team had both more ABs and a higher OPS than Sappelt, and another guy was only 9 points behind Sappelt.  THREE of the four Louisville players who had a better OPS than Sappelt were also younger than he is.  So his AAA performance does not particularly impress me.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/team.cgi?id=a1acca49
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 25, 2011, 01:58:07 pm
SZ, the part I'm in on with Cubsin is not the position or comparison as much as the trading chip.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 25, 2011, 04:05:42 pm
SZ, the part I'm in on with Cubsin is not the position or comparison as much as the trading chip.

No room on the bandwagon now, Curt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 25, 2011, 04:16:02 pm
Is too!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: UK on December 26, 2011, 06:18:03 pm
Sappelt had some major mechanical changes at the plate between '09 and '10. I think he could be adequate in CF. Oddly enough, I think his most likely comp pick is a slightly Reed Johnson with better contact skills and speed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 26, 2011, 09:02:56 pm
Most scouts say that Sappelt can not play CF in the majors other than in an emergency.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 26, 2011, 10:42:56 pm
If the Cubs aren't an emergency, I don't know what is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 06, 2012, 02:56:07 pm
Can anyone access this link?

BaseballAmerica Baseball America
 by BleacherNation
Cubs' Ridling Makes His Case: Sooner or later, somebody is going to take notice of Rebel Ridling. While the Cubs... bit.ly/zRjwIa
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on January 06, 2012, 03:14:32 pm
Nope.  Asking for a username and password.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 06, 2012, 03:18:14 pm
You can use mine...   *********
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 06, 2012, 03:30:03 pm
Cubs' Ridling Makes His Case

By Phil Rogers
January 6, 2012
 (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/email.gif)E-mail (?subject=Baseball America: Cubs%27%20Ridling%20Makes%20His%20Case&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseballamerica.com%2Fonline%2Fmajors%2Forganization-reports%2Fchicago-cubs%2F2012%2F2612788.html) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/print.gif)Print (http://bbf.createaforum.com/javascript:window.print())
 
CHICAGO—Sooner or later, somebody is going to take notice of Rebel Ridling.

While the Cubs search for undervalued players elsewhere, they have one of their own in the 25-year-old first baseman. Ridling hit .309/.372/.515 with 20 home runs for Double-A Tennessee last season, and he continued to hit with Magallanes in the Venezuelan League. But Theo Epstein and Jed Hoyer left him off the 40-man roster and perhaps breathed a sigh of relief when he wasn't claimed in the Rule 5 draft.

Ridling, a 25th-round pick in the 2008 draft from Oklahoma State, has taken a step-by-step approach through the Cubs system, delivering an .800-plus OPS in two of the last three seasons. He seems set to play for Triple-A Iowa in 2012 after driving in 80 runs with Tennessee last season.

"Sometimes you never know when the light's going to go on for a guy," farm director Oneri Fleita said. "He's a good first baseman and his defense keeps getting better, and now he's chasing the ball around left field some too. He's become a better hitter. He's cut down his strikeouts, seeing more pitches." 

Ridling and Bryan LaHair, who is expected to get a chance to fill the Cubs' first-base opening, have spent the winter with Magallanes. Ridling has played first base, left field and DH, with LaHair sometimes playing the outfield, which has allowed both to be in the lineup.

While LaHair's terrific winter has drawn attention (he was hitting .280/.414/.610 with 15 home runs), Ridling has remained in the shadows. He was hitting .338/.395/.364 in 77 at-bats. The downside was that he had generated just two extra-base hits and three RBIs. 

"Sometimes the power doesn't show up in those ballparks," Fleita said. "They're like graveyards. But he can hit for power. We've seen that."

Fleita believes Ridling will benefit from his trip to Venezuela.

"This will be a hell of an opportunity for him," he said. "I look for him to have a big season (in 2012). I really do."
Cubbyhole

• The Cubs added to their inventory of prospects by acquiring 19-year-old second baseman Ronald Torreyes and 25-year-old outfielder Dave Sappelt in the Dec. 23 trade that sent Sean Marshall to the Reds for lefthander Travis Wood. The 5-foot-7, 140-pound Torreyes hit .356/.398/.457 in 278 at-bats with low Class A Dayton last season.

• Trying to regain his sparkle, Jay Jackson has had an up-and-down winter. The 24-year-old righthander was 3-2, 5.56 for Caracas after getting knocked out in the first inning of a start on Dec. 22. He was 8-14, 5.34 at Iowa in 2011.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 06, 2012, 03:31:09 pm
Thanks, JR
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on January 06, 2012, 04:08:14 pm
I was interested in reading that article but then I noticed the author's name.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 06, 2012, 11:10:50 pm
Cubs top 25 prospects according to John Sickels.  Rizzo comes in second behind Brett Jackson.

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/1/6/2688854/chicago-cubs-top-20-prospects-for-2012 (http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/1/6/2688854/chicago-cubs-top-20-prospects-for-2012)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 07, 2012, 07:48:39 am
Interesting list and assessments.   20% of the guys on the list have been acquired through trades by Theo & Jed.  Zach Cates is rated #16.


Considering Sickles' own description of his ratings ("
I'm a tough grader; Grade C+ is actually good praise coming from me, and some C+ prospects turn out very well indeed."), it looks pretty encouraging for the future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 07, 2012, 10:47:41 am
It is true that 20% of the top 20 prospects have been acquired through trades.  But only about 6% of the top 15 have been acquired through trades.

Other than Rizzo, none those acquired through trades are considered to be impact prospects.  They merely add to the depth of a system already deep in good, but non-impact prospects.

I am not unhappy with any of the trades made so far, but for the most part, they smack of a new management team trying to put their mark on the new organization.  Out with the old.  In with the new.

I am much more impressed with the stated philosophy of building from within, through the farm system.  It is an outstanding philosophy today, just as it was when John Holland espoused it. 

And Dallas Green.
 
And Larry Himes. 

And Andy McPhail. 

And Hendry.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 07, 2012, 11:11:47 am
I agree, Dave.  It's what I was driving at in the other topic.  Most people come in with grand intentions, and we're overwhelmed with some of their first moves, and then....then?

I think there is so much ego and self-assuredness that they are like some board posters who can't concede they might be wrong.  "By gawd, I just know that this Coleman kid can pitch and I will keep putting him on the mound until they drag my carcass out of here."  Even at the high school level I remember sticking with some kids because I deeply believed in them...didn't always work out.  Why did Hendry destroy his legacy, in my opinion, with the Bradley move?

So, I think how well this admin team does is not so much dependent on these moves, but how quickly they're ready to make additional moves if they see they were mistaken or overly optimistic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on January 07, 2012, 12:42:46 pm
"...for the most part, they smack of a new management team trying to put their mark on the new organization.  Out with the old.  In with the new."

I disagree. Hoystein isn't making these moves because they feel the need to mark something, like a dog peeing on a fire hydrant. They're making these moves because they feel they improve the club. Suggesting other motives seems goofy.

They may very well VALUE players in different ways than previous GM's. In fact, I would argue that this is one of the main reasons they were hired. That's a very different thing compared to what you are suggesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 07, 2012, 01:22:26 pm
I don't think that's what Dave meant.  I think he meant what you state in your final paragraph.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: UK on January 10, 2012, 04:56:37 pm
Video of Vogelbach with aluminum. Scroll to about 3:26.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulw6sJqW03A
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 10, 2012, 07:22:07 pm
If he were a complete player, he could lay down a bunt....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 11, 2012, 12:45:42 pm
Balanguert got 400,000 and Martinez got 250,000, per Ben Badler.

Balanguert is the Cuban outfielder that got a lukewarm BA review. Martinez is the Cuban pitcher, IIRC the report was that he was a big guy with a low-90's fastball and not much of a breaking ball at present. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 11, 2012, 01:10:24 pm
The Cubs have lost IF Jeff Bianchi on waivers to the Brewers.  He was picked up off waivers from Kansas City in December.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 11, 2012, 01:11:51 pm
Carrie Muskat says Bianchi "Could" open a spot on the 40-man roster.   Could?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 11, 2012, 01:12:37 pm
Paul Sullivan says, yes, it opens a spot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 11, 2012, 01:35:44 pm
They will still need another spot when they sign Wood.  Probably Mateo
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 11, 2012, 01:53:55 pm
If this happened under Hendry, wouldn't folks be p*ssing and moaning about his mis-handling of the 40 man roster?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 17, 2012, 09:48:31 am
I just found an interesting page on the MLB site.  Here you can find all the winter league stats for players from any major league organization.

Here is the page for the Cubs.

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/org.jsp?id=chc

And the page to find winter stats for all MLB organizations.

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 17, 2012, 09:59:55 am
Isn't the last pitcher on the list...nevermind...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 17, 2012, 11:04:56 am
Who is Oswaldo Martinez?  96 winter games?  105 innings and a 2.06 ERA?  Seems like a lot of "winter games," and a pretty good performance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 18, 2012, 01:14:19 pm
MLB.com's Top 50 Prospects list has been expanded to 100. The 2012 version will be unveiled on Wednesday, Jan. 25, on MLB.com as well as on a one-hour show on MLB Network, airing at 10 p.m. ET. Leading up to that, MLB.com will take a look at baseball's top ten prospects at each position.

Here are the shortstops


http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120117&content_id=26374282&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb (http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120117&content_id=26374282&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb)


Quote

8. Javier Baez, Cubs: Baez went one spot after Lindor in the 2011 Draft, and while Lindor might be the better all-around shortstop, a very good argument can be made that Baez is the better pure hitter. His plus bat speed should enable him to hit for average and power. Baez doesn't get cheated at the plate, and his already-impressive skills will be even better once he learns a bit more plate discipline. He's not a slouch defensively, with a strong arm and good hands, but he doesn't have the same kind of range Lindor has. Some think a move to third is in Baez's future, and his bat should be more than fine to profile well there. That bat could allow Baez to move speedily through the system, regardless of his defensive home.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on January 18, 2012, 01:19:49 pm
Hopefully, with the improved front office and their offensive philosophy, there is a chance that Javier Baez can improve his plate discipline.

I still don't think he stays at short, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 18, 2012, 01:23:07 pm
I really get the feeling Baez is going to turn out to be a beast of a hitter.  You don't just hit .711 against a national schedule in Florida without having some truly special hitting ability. 

I don't think it will turn out to matter that much if Baez can handle short or not.  His offensive ceiling is off the charts and will be able to play anywhere on the field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 18, 2012, 01:27:32 pm
Including catcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 18, 2012, 02:26:13 pm
What would be really nice would be turning Baez into a solid defensive second baseman. An infield of Rizzo, Baez, Castro and Vitters (or Lake) sounds really promising to me. An outfield of Jackson, Cespedes and Szczur wouldn't be bad, either. Then the Cubs could spend all their FA money on pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on January 18, 2012, 02:30:35 pm
If Baez ends up moving off short to 3b, that's not much of a downgrade, either. Based on his scouting reports (soft hands, strong arm) it sounds like he could be a plus defender at third.

The current average offensive output for major league 3bmen is atrocious, so the prospect of a good bat, good glove Baez at the hot corner is quite intriguing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on January 18, 2012, 02:42:53 pm
What would be really nice would be turning Baez into a solid defensive second baseman. An infield of Rizzo, Baez, Castro and Vitters (or Lake) sounds really promising to me. An outfield of Jackson, Cespedes and Szczur wouldn't be bad, either. Then the Cubs could spend all their FA money on pitching.

I think the best outcome for the Cubs as far as the "infield of the future" is probably Anthony Rizzo at 1B, Ronaldo Torreyes at 2B, Starlin Castro at SS and Javier Baez at 3B.

Offensively and defensively (if Castro can get it together) that could be exceptional, if everything panned out the way the Theocracy sees things now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on January 18, 2012, 03:15:07 pm
The 5th best prospect on that list was Hak-Ju Lee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 18, 2012, 03:39:41 pm
Bitterman, what's interesting is that Lee was not on the list at all in 2011, so did Rays do development or is it that nobody noticed him until the Cubs traded him.  New names, like Lindor and Baez, came out of the draft but how about the other five?  7 new names...and where did the 7 old ones go.

Is this list in order of probable impact or current value?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 18, 2012, 03:40:40 pm
Lee for Garza.  So far, it looks pretty good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on January 18, 2012, 03:49:07 pm
Bitterman, what's interesting is that Lee was not on the list at all in 2011, so did Rays do development or is it that nobody noticed him until the Cubs traded him.  New names, like Lindor and Baez, came out of the draft but how about the other five?  7 new names...and where did the 7 old ones go.

Is this list in order of probable impact or current value?

Did those missing guys graduate to the Majors or perhaps change positions?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 18, 2012, 04:37:56 pm
Did those missing guys graduate to the Majors or perhaps change positions?

Maybe changed positions.  I didn't recognize many names of graduates.  Most probably fell in esteem or gave way to new draft picks, like Lindor and Baez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 18, 2012, 05:43:56 pm
Cubs Sign Jason Jaramillo (http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/01/cubs-sign-jason-jaramillo.html)
By Ben Nicholson-Smith [January 18 at 5:00pm CST]

The Cubs completed their minor league deal with catcher Jason Jaramillo (http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/j/jaramja01.shtml?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=linker&utm_campaign=Linker), MLBTR's Tim Dierkes has learned. MLBTR reported (http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/12/cubs-close-to-deal-with-jason-jaramillo.html) in December that the Cubs were nearing a deal with the 29-year-old.
Jaramillo has accumulated 366 big league plate appearances over the last three seasons with the Pirates, hitting .235/.293/.327. A former second-round pick of the Phillies, Jaramillo missed much of this season with an elbow injury. The switch-hitter will be a candidate for the Cubs' backup catcher job behind Geovany Soto (http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/sotoge01.shtml?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=linker&utm_campaign=Linker), a role filled by Koyie Hill (http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/h/hillko01.shtml?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=linker&utm_campaign=Linker) the last several years. Jaramillo is a native of Wisconsin.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 18, 2012, 06:34:02 pm
Jaramillo's 3 year total OPS+ is 67.

67.

Weak as that is, it's better than Hill was.  64 in 2009, 46 in 2010, and 50 in 2011.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 18, 2012, 07:03:33 pm
Bitterman, what's interesting is that Lee was not on the list at all in 2011, so did Rays do development or is it that nobody noticed him until the Cubs traded him.  New names, like Lindor and Baez, came out of the draft but how about the other five?  7 new names...and where did the 7 old ones go.



Well, let's start by looking at the 2011 list.


TOP 10 SHORTSTOP PROSPECTS
#   PLAYER   ORG
1.   Manny Machado  BAL  repeated in 2012 as top prospect
2.   Nick Franklin   SEA    dropped 4 spots to 6th
3.   Jose Iglesias   BOS    hit .235 with a .554 OPS after moving from AA to AAA -- off the list
4.   Dee Gordon   LAD     moved from AA to AAA, significantly improved hitting... and fell off list
5.   Jurickson Profar   TEX     moved from low A at 17 to A at 18 with a 187 point better OPS... and fell off list
6.   Wilmer Flores   NYM    repeated high A with a 4 point drop in OPS and fell off list
7.   Adeiny Hechavarria   TOR   repeated AA with a 40 point drop in OPS and fell off list (but also had 100+ AB in AAA with roughly a 300 point jump in OPS.... go figure)
8.   Grant Green   OAK    moved from high A to AA, lost 133 OPS points, fell off list
9.   Christian Colon   KC      moved from high A to AA with a 37 point drop in OPS, fell off list
10.   Chris Owings   ARI      moved from high A to A, lost 108 OPS points, fell off list

All but two of those who fell off the list remained exclusively at SS in 2011, and the two who othe playing time elsewhere remained primarily at SS.
 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on January 19, 2012, 12:53:54 am
Didn't BA rate Archer the 3rd best prospect in a very good Tampa system?  I think the only guy rated above Archer and Lee is one of the best pitching prospects in the game.

So, it was a very good-to-great SS prospect and a very good RH pitching prospect for Garza.

I still say it was a horribly stupid trade.  You can not trade SS prospects like Lee, especially when your team has so many holes and it was a big IF if you could compete.  Imagine this team with the prospect of having an infield of Castro/Lee/Baez/Rizzo.

Yeah, that would have been nice.

It was a stupid trade.  A stupid move by a guy who saw a tiny chance at competing and wanted to keep his job.  I would much rather have Lee than Garza.  We will see what they get for Garza in return.  Hopefully it won't be any less than what they lost.  Now that Darvish is signed, hopefully the other dominoes will fall (Oswalt, Jackson) and someone who is desperate for pitching help will be left standing.

I'm still hopeful that this trade can still be a positive.  If they keep Garza, it's nothing but a waste of a good player.  This team will not be competitive in the foreseeable future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on January 19, 2012, 01:16:53 am
Bitterman is appropriately named
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on January 19, 2012, 01:50:39 am
For what it's worth, most prospect lists are much lower on Archer than BA.

Everyone agrees that Lee's defense is special; he should be one of the best defensive shortstops in the game. That has more value than most recognize, I think. He has a solid walk rate, too. His OBP should always be useful. Whether he will be able to hit over .280 or have any power at all are still question marks.

Garza was one of the 15 best pitchers in baseball last year. We gave up a lot to get him, but he's been worth it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on January 19, 2012, 02:12:49 am
Another way to look at it: Garza is a top 15 pitcher. Most publications will have Lee as a 25-50 top prospect. Most will also rate him outside the top 5 SS prospects (Machado, Profar, Sano, Profar, and Lindor will consistently rank ahead; some might also rank our own Baez ahead).

Meanwhile, the guy most consistently linked to Garza trade discussions is Turner, who is a top 10-15 prospect. No, the Tigers haven't dealt him yet, but no one is suggesting that the asking price of Turner is out of line.

The notion that we have up too much or won't be able to get as much in return for Garza I disagree with.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 19, 2012, 02:29:59 am
Guyer is not chopped liver.  TB likes him, and so does BA.  He's a good player.

The bigger issue for me is that LH-hitting Gold-Glove shortstops who walk and can steal 40 bases are a lot harder to find than #2-3 starters, which is what Garza is.  What he isn't - or wasn't in 2011 or any other year so far - is a top-15 pitcher.  Top 25-30, maybe, but no better than that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 19, 2012, 05:48:27 am
I like Lee, but it's still pretty early to be calling him a sure thing to accomplish great things in the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 19, 2012, 07:55:33 am
Minor League Ball's Top 20 Cubs Prospects
2011 Minor League Ball's Ranking in Parenthesis - (NA - not available, NR - not ranked)

1. Brett Jackson, OF - B+ (1)
2. Anthony Rizzo, 1B - B+ (NA)
3. Javier Baez, SS-3B - B (NA)
4. Matt Szczur, OF - B- (NR)
5. Trey McNutt, RHP - B- (2)
6. Dillon Maples, RHP - B- (NA)
7. Dan Vogelbach, 1B - B- (NA)
8. Junior Lake, SS - C+ (NR)
9. Welington Castillo, C - C+ (NR)
10. Dae-Eun Rhee, RHP - C+ (NR)
11. Josh Vitters, 3B-1B - C+ (10)
12. Jeimer Candelario, 3B - C+ (NA)
13. Marco Hernandez, SS - C+ (NA)
14. Chris Carpenter, RHP - C+ (5)
15. Rafael Dolis, RHP - C+ (17)
16. Zach Cates, RHP - C+ (NA)
17. Ben Wells, RHP - C+ (NR)
18. Dave Sappelt, OF - C+ (NA)
19. Ronald Torreyes, 2B - C+ (NA)
20. Reggie Golden, OF - C+ (9)
21. Gioskar Amaya, INF - C+ (NA)
22. Tony Zych, RHP - C+ (NA)
23. Shawon Dunston, Jr., OF - C+ (NA)
24. Aaron Kurcz, RHP - C+ (NR)

Others: Jeffry Antigua, LHP; Dallas Beeler, RHP; Jeff Beliveau, LHP; Jeff Bianchi, INF; Lendy Castillo, RHP; Pin-Cheih Chen, OF; Zeke DeVoss, 2B; Jae-Hoon Ha, OF; Jay Jackson, RHP; Eric Jokisch, LHP; Austin Kirk, LHP; Luis Liria, RHP; Kevin Rhoderick, RHP, Jose Rosario, RHP, Neftali Rosario, C; Hayden Simpson, RHP; Nick Stuck, RHP, Yao-Ling Wang, RHP, Logan Watkins, 2B; Robert Whitenack, RHP

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/1/6/2688854/chicago-cubs-top-20-prospects-for-2012 (http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/1/6/2688854/chicago-cubs-top-20-prospects-for-2012)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 19, 2012, 11:31:37 am
A reasonable evaluation.  About the only one I strongly disagree with is Torreyes.  I think he should be just behind Candelario.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 19, 2012, 11:57:48 am
I like Lee, but it's still pretty early to be calling him a sure thing to accomplish great things in the majors.

Who did that?

Prospects are prospects - there are no sure things.  You project and take your chances.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on January 19, 2012, 03:05:08 pm
As I wrote, I hope the Cubs do the correct thing and trade Garza AND get back at least what they lost.

BUT, the Cubs were in a largely iffy position last season, and to trade some of their top prospects for Garza was stupid.  I think they will be lucky to get a player as valuable as Lee, but we will hopefully see.

The worst thing they can do is just sit on Garza or extend him.  There's no damn point.  The Cubs will not be competitive for a long while and you are just wasting an asset in Garza by keeping him, and wasting his prime years as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 19, 2012, 03:06:45 pm
The Cubs will be competitive in 2013, and will be better than most expect in 2012.  Giving Garza f 4 or 5 year contract would be a good idea.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on January 19, 2012, 03:20:58 pm
How will this team foreseeably be competitive in 2013?  B/c given what they have right now, it's tough to foresee it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 19, 2012, 03:22:38 pm
The Cubs are going to be very, very bad this year but if Ricketts takes a crowbar to the wallet it's possible they could be competitive next year.  2014-15 is more likely.  You might get practical value out of Garza if you extend him, but for where this organization is trading him now makes by far the most sense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 19, 2012, 03:28:02 pm
I still say the Cubs would win about 75 games this year if Garza is on the team.  Replace Soriano with a guy who can field while posting at least a .320 OBP/.400 SLG, and you'll add a couple more wins to that.  They're better now than they were last year.

If they don't trade Garza and get a little luck, a .500 record wouldn't be out of the question this year. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 19, 2012, 03:37:23 pm
There are a number of things that can make the Cubs competitive in 2013, and management seems to be doing most of them.  They have improved the defense greatly, and if Rizzo is as good a prospect as proclaimed, he can be coming into his own by 2013, along with Brett Jackson and Ian Scott.  The starting pitchers look as if they could be decent, and at the end of next year, there is a large amount of money coming off the books.  Some of it is likely to be funneled into the free agent market.

I think 75 wins is a low estimate for the upcoming year, and there should be considerable improvement the following year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 19, 2012, 04:13:39 pm
Agree with Dave...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on January 19, 2012, 04:27:19 pm
I still don't trade Garza unless I can get someone to overpay.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 19, 2012, 04:33:08 pm
I don't see 75 wins in 2012 without about 20 forfeits.  Better than 2011?  Better to watch, maybe - less disgusting, maybe smarter, harder working - but better?  This is a AAA team, basically, plus Castro and a few pitchers.  I don't have a problem with that because I see the long-term plan, but let's try and be realistic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 19, 2012, 04:35:38 pm
I've said this many times, and other people (tico?) have too...a lot of people are far, far underestimating what a negative impact the pitching behind Garza and Dempster and the defense had last year.  In the games started by Lopez, Coleman, Ortiz, and Davis, the Cubs were 12-32.  That's a .273 winning percentage, or 44 win pace over roughly one quarter of the season.  Add in Randy Wells' first 14 starts (when he was pitching hurt--he pretty much admitted this in August), and they were 17-41 (.293; 47 win pace) over 36% of the season.

To put that into perspective, Fangraphs projects that a team of 25 replacement level players--guys who are readily available on the waiver wire or in AAA (essentially AAAA players)--would win about 45 games.  So despite the fact that the Cubs had a starting lineup that included three legitimately good players like Castro, Ramirez, and Pena (plus role players like Byrd, Soto, and Barney), they still played essentially at the same level as a replacement level team in the games started by the #4 and #5 starters.  Add in Zambrano's awful year, and you're up to about half the season filled with complete garbage in the starting rotation.

It takes some exceptionally bad pitching and defense to be that awful.  The bar is very low for improvement...filling the 3, 4, and 5 spots with three league average #5 starters improves this team by at least 5 games.  And with Wood, Maholm, Volstad, and healthy Wells, I think they've done considerably better than three #5 starters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on January 19, 2012, 04:44:35 pm
So the pitching might be better ... how about the hitting?  You've replaced Ramirez and Pena w/ Ian Stewart and Bryan Lahair.  I say that more than makes up for the pitching improvement .... and the D improvement from what I see is Stewart over Ramirez (and perhaps that improvement is negated by Lahair for Pena.).  And then there's the loss of Marshall to speak about.

This team is very bad right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 19, 2012, 04:56:15 pm
There are a number of things that can make the Cubs competitive in 2013, and management seems to be doing most of them.  They have improved the defense greatly ....

Not sure I get this. 

Castro, Barney, Soto, Byrd, and Soriano appear to be back. 

Fuku wasn't a bad fielder, so the DeJesus upgrade is modest. 

The big changes are in the infield:
Stewart for Aram, big upgrade.
Lahair for Pena, big downgrade. 

I'd think the LaHair downgrade will basically wash out the Stewart upgrade. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 19, 2012, 04:58:09 pm
Well, it depends on what Ian Stewart you get.  If you get the Ian Stewart that the Rockies got before his 2011 disaster (and he was basically the same player he'd always been when he played at AAA last year), then you haven't lost much value at all at third base.  Stewart with a .750-.800 OPS and better than average defense is probably at least as valuable a player as Ramirez is with a mid-.800s OPS and his worst-in-the-league style of defense.

I'm not sold on LaHair...but it's not like this is the Carlos Pena of 5 years ago he's replacing.  Pena had an .819 OPS last year...pretty good, but it's not out of the question that LaHair can come close to that.  And I am a believer in Rizzo...if LaHair doesn't hit, Rizzo will be up by midseason and I think he'll be able to come close to equaling Pena out of the gate.

Plus, DeJesus is likely to be considerably better than any rightfielder the Cubs had last year.  He'll make up some of the ground lost.  Then you have continued development for Castro to consider, and the likelihood that they'll get at least some bounce back from Soto.

Upgrades to the back-end of the rotation & defense >>>> Downgrades in offense at 1B and 3B and the loss of Marshall.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on January 19, 2012, 04:59:38 pm
Deeg, the advanced metrics show Garza was top 15 last year. Not sure which sets of numbers you fancy, but the ones I Like (and our new brain trust, too) show as much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 19, 2012, 05:03:55 pm
Deeg, the advanced metrics show Garza was top 15 last year. Not sure which sets of numbers you fancy, but the ones I Like (and our new brain trust, too) show as much.
Garza was definitely not top 15 in defense in 2011. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 19, 2012, 05:52:34 pm
There are a number of things that can make the Cubs competitive in 2013, and management seems to be doing most of them.  They have improved the defense greatly, and if Rizzo is as good a prospect as proclaimed, he can be coming into his own by 2013, along with Brett Jackson and Ian Scott.  The starting pitchers look as if they could be decent, and at the end of next year, there is a large amount of money coming off the books.  Some of it is likely to be funneled into the free agent market.

I think 75 wins is a low estimate for the upcoming year, and there should be considerable improvement the following year.

Who is Ian Scott.   I googled it and it said French pornographic star.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 19, 2012, 05:58:13 pm
Garza scraping into the tail-end of the top 15 in one metric among dozens (WAR) doesn't make him a top 15 pitcher.  If you like WAR, Garza's 09-11 numbers place him at about 30th, which is about where I figure he is.  Trust me - if Garza were a legit #1 starter, he'd already have been dealt for more than what Epstein is supposedly asking.

I'm not sure I buy the notion that DeJesus is an "upgrade" in RF.  DeJesus had an OPS of .699 last year, and Fukudome was .743 with the Cubs (with very good defense).  DeJesus will probably be better than he was last year based on ballpark factors and career norms, but .743 is just about what he's likely to produce.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on January 19, 2012, 06:01:58 pm
C'mon, guys, you are all totally overlooking the most significant upgrade:  the new manager.  The effect of Sveum and playing the "Cubs way" should add at least ten wins.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 19, 2012, 06:10:28 pm
C'mon, guys, you are all totally overlooking the most significant upgrade:  the new manager.  The effect of Sveum and playing the "Cubs way" should add at least ten wins.


Fixed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on January 19, 2012, 06:23:54 pm
Aw, that takes all the fun out of it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 19, 2012, 06:31:57 pm
I am also assuming that Soriano will NOT be the starting left fielder.  If he is, that will hurt a lot.  But if he is NOT, then even Hank Sauer would be a substantial upgrade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 19, 2012, 06:37:27 pm
DeJesus will not be a great upgrade over Fukudome in right field, but he will be an immense upgrade over Colvin in right field. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on January 19, 2012, 06:38:16 pm
Hank has been dead around 10 years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 19, 2012, 07:08:49 pm
DeJesus will not be a great upgrade over Fukudome in right field, but he will be an immense upgrade over Colvin in right field. 

Since Fukudome was our RF most of the year, that doesn't explain how DeJesus is going to make us so much better in 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 19, 2012, 07:24:52 pm
Fukudome was the starting right fielder in 72 Cub games.  I am not sure that less than half qualifies as "most"..
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 19, 2012, 09:24:37 pm
It's still a weak argument.  David DeJesus is the centerpiece of why we're going to be much improved?  He's a marginal starter, ideally a 4th OF, even if last year was a fluke.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 19, 2012, 09:26:26 pm
The worst thing they can do is just sit on Garza or extend him.  There's no damn point.  The Cubs will not be competitive for a long while and you are just wasting an asset in Garza by keeping him, and wasting his prime years as well.

While I agree, aren't you one of those who until just the last couple of months was insisting that there was no reason for the Cubs to ever move into the full rebuild mode because they had the resources to be competitive year in and year out, even when they need to "re-tool," and that there is never any reason they should need to or even be willing to write off as much as a single season while they rebuild?

Is my memory bad, did I misunderstand, or did you change your position?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 19, 2012, 09:30:31 pm
I think 75 wins is a low estimate for the upcoming year, and there should be considerable improvement the following year.

I am assuming that your reference to Ian Scott was actually a reference to Ian Stewart.... who is most likely to be an absolute bust, but setting that aside, what do you believe a reasonable estimate is for the Cubs' 2012 win total?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 19, 2012, 09:57:08 pm
It's still a weak argument.  David DeJesus is the centerpiece of why we're going to be much improved?  He's a marginal starter, ideally a 4th OF, even if last year was a fluke.

I didn't see anyone making that "centerpiece" argument.  And I think it's wise to be realistic about the possibilities for next year, good and bad.  DeJesus could be a real upgrade in RF I think, but it's not a sure thing.  Ian Stewart may or may not be a significant asset.  LaHair could prove to be a slight upgrade from Hoffpauier (sp?) or he could become a quality major league hitter.   Who knows who will end up playing LF (or if it's Soriano how he will do in the new environment), or CF for that matter. And then there is the pitching.  Lots of questions.  I don't ever feel comfortable making predictions about how many games the Cubs will win in a season, but it seems to me that this season is especially problematic for making predictions. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on January 19, 2012, 10:01:18 pm
Deeg, I'm talking about xFIP, not WAR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 19, 2012, 11:15:19 pm
It's still a weak argument.  David DeJesus is the centerpiece of why we're going to be much improved?  He's a marginal starter, ideally a 4th OF, even if last year was a fluke.

DeJesus is hardly the centerpiece.  Rizzo, Stewart, and Brett Jackson, and the improved pitching staff are, as well as whoever they sign as free agents.  But DeJesus IS an upgrade over half a year of Fukudome and half a year of Colvin.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on January 19, 2012, 11:44:31 pm
A big part of any defensive improvement will depend on Castro.  Not only cutting down on the errors but improving on the DP, and tag plays at the base (which saw improvement after the break last season), and concentration lapses on defense.   

The left side of the IF was terrible defensively last year and Stewart will be way, way better than Aramis and, hopefully, Castro-12 will be way better than Castro-11.

If that happens, Cubs defense will be a lot better overall.

I also doubt we will see Soriano play 1,000 innings on defense and I expect Rizzo to be at 1B by the break.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 20, 2012, 12:27:05 am
DeJesus is hardly the centerpiece.  Rizzo, Stewart, and Brett Jackson, and the improved pitching staff are, as well as whoever they sign as free agents.  But DeJesus IS an upgrade over half a year of Fukudome and half a year of Colvin.

Rizzo, Stewart and Jackson - well, two of them - are likely to be long-term assets.  But they're likely to be significant offensive downgrades next season.  And next season is what we're talking about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 20, 2012, 07:28:56 am
Rizzo, Stewart and Jackson - well, two of them - are likely to be long-term assets.  But they're likely to be significant offensive downgrades next season.  And next season is what we're talking about.

The only quibble I have with that statement is that Jackson could be an offensive upgrade over whomever he replaces in the OF.  As we all know neither Byrd (.719 OPS) nor Soriano had good offensive years last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 20, 2012, 12:20:10 pm
Austin Bibens-Dirkx has signed a minor league deal with Washington.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 20, 2012, 12:59:50 pm
The only quibble I have with that statement is that Jackson could be an offensive upgrade over whomever he replaces in the OF.  As we all know neither Byrd (.719 OPS) nor Soriano had good offensive years last year.

Yeah, it's certainly possible Jackson could be an upgrade next season over what Byrd did.  But not so much as to make the club significantly better.

I'm fine with losing this year because I believe in the overall vision.  I just don't see the source of all this insistence that we'll be a .500 team with mostly AAA players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 20, 2012, 01:04:08 pm
Rizzo, Stewart and Jackson - well, two of them - are likely to be long-term assets.  But they're likely to be significant offensive downgrades next season.  And next season is what we're talking about.

Next season is indeed what we are talking about, but offense is not the only thing we are talking about.  The defense is going to be much better, which will make the pitching much better.  Specifically, the offense and defense in right field with DeJesus out there is likely to be much better than the offense and defense in right field with Fukudome and Colvin splitting the job.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 20, 2012, 01:10:21 pm
MLB.com top ten catcher prospects - no Cubs

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120118&content_id=26377496&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120118&content_id=26377496&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb)


With only one Cub listed in the first three positions (SS, 3B, C) there aren't going to be many cracking their top 50.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 20, 2012, 01:20:19 pm
You're giving DeJesus too much defensive credit and Fukudome not enough if you think the difference is such that it will significantly improve the overall team defense.  Fukudome was very good with the glove, for all the pointless crap he took around these parts.  And DeJesus isn't the defender he once was. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on January 20, 2012, 01:20:43 pm
Next season is indeed what we are talking about, but offense is not the only thing we are talking about.  The defense is going to be much better, which will make the pitching much better.  Specifically, the offense and defense in right field with DeJesus out there is likely to be much better than the offense and defense in right field with Fukudome and Colvin splitting the job.

You realize that David DeJesus was goc awful last season, right?

Didn't he OPS under .700?

And he's supposed to be an offensive upgrade?

He's been fragile in recent years since he broke his wrist and his playing style does not lend itself to fewer games missed as he grows older.

DeJesus is no sure thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 20, 2012, 01:33:23 pm
You're giving DeJesus too much defensive credit and Fukudome not enough if you think the difference is such that it will significantly improve the overall team defense.  Fukudome was very good with the glove, for all the pointless crap he took around these parts.  And DeJesus isn't the defender he once was. 

amen
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 20, 2012, 03:12:40 pm
You realize that David DeJesus was goc awful last season, right?

Didn't he OPS under .700?

And he's supposed to be an offensive upgrade?

He's been fragile in recent years since he broke his wrist and his playing style does not lend itself to fewer games missed as he grows older.

DeJesus is no sure thing.

I would be willing to place a bet that DeJesus will produce an OPS in 2012 that is higher than the 509 that Colvin produced in 2011.

DeJesus isn't very good offensively.  But he is an upgrade over the production that we received in the games that Colvin played, and fairly close to that of Fukudome.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 20, 2012, 03:26:41 pm
I have always liked DeJesus.  I've had him on multiple fantasy teams.  When I lived in Nebraska, we got to see him regularly on tv on Royals games.  His skills have headed south, so much so that paying him 10MM and squealing about Soriano's exorbitant 18MM is an oxymoron, like Davep.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 20, 2012, 03:29:53 pm
DeJesus is no sure thing.

He's sure to be a disappointment to fans who expect much from him.

He's 32 years old this season and has a career OPS+ of 106.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 20, 2012, 04:10:29 pm
That's oxymorAn, dumbass
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 20, 2012, 04:13:38 pm
I don't think the fans expect very much from DeJesus.  He wasn't much more than mediocre in his prime, and he is past his prime.  But he doesn't have to produce very much to exceed the production, offensively and defensively, of Fukudome/Colvin.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 20, 2012, 04:18:23 pm
I'm not expecting much, moran, but is he worth 10MM?

If Hendry had paid him 10MM, we'd never hear the end of it.

BTW, somebody said it was a 10MM contract, is that really true?  Maybe it's not so bad.  Or is it 10MM over 2 years?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on January 20, 2012, 04:20:04 pm
It's a two-year contract.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 20, 2012, 04:21:59 pm
Thanks, SZ.  Now I feel better.  Too bad Soriano doesn't have a 3/18 instead of a 3/64.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 20, 2012, 04:28:05 pm
It's $10 million over 2 years.

I don't expect a ton from DeJesus, but I think people are selling him short.  He was injured and played in one of the worst hitters parks in baseball last year (especially for LH hitters).  He'll rebound a good bit by just playing in a ballpark that is good for LH hitters.  Fangraphs also still had him as an elite (or at least close to it) defender in RF.  He's a guy who doesn't have the typical corner outfield skills (specifically, home run power), but does other things well enough (defense, doubles/triples power, OBP) to still be an average or better corner outfielder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 20, 2012, 05:02:11 pm
I don't expect big things from DeJesus either, but 2 years and $10 million isn't bad and is probably what he's worth at this point.  If he stinks this year, it's not like it's a Soriano/Zambrano/Bradley type albatross contract.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 20, 2012, 07:20:19 pm
I don't expect a ton from DeJesus, but I think people are selling him short.  He was injured and played in one of the worst hitters parks in baseball last year (especially for LH hitters).  He'll rebound a good bit by just playing in a ballpark that is good for LH hitters.

When 32 year old players come off a down year, when they were also injured, the odds are not that they "rebound," but that they continue to decline, and are more likely to be re-injured.

Remember when Soriano was with the Cubs his first year in 2007, when he was 31.... and he had a decent year, but not as good as we all had hoped, and that was partly due to injury?

He went from an OPS+ of 135 in 2006 (his career year) in 159 games, to an OPS+ of 122 in 135 games with the Cubs.  But we all expected him to "rebound" in 2008.

His OPS+ in 2008 was 119, and more injuries limited him to 109 years.

The performance naturally declines after about 29, and the risk of injury climbs, simply as a result of aging.  Add to that the injury he had in 2011, and the likelihood of injury again in 2012 simply climbs.

Hopefully he will rebound.

I simply wouldn't hold my breath on that one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 20, 2012, 07:22:29 pm
I had no idea how much DeJesus will be paid.  I am glad that someone could clear that up.  But the discussion was not whether DeJesus was worth whatever he was being paid.  The discussion was whether we have reason to believe that the Cubs team will perform better or worse than last year. 

And specifically, whether DeJesus would perform better overall than fukudome and Colvin did last year.

If Dejesus was paid 100 million, that wouldn't have had any effect on that discussion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 20, 2012, 07:47:14 pm
Maybe that was YOUR discussion, Davepoxymoron, but I was saying that if we are going to continue to cry over Sori's salary than we should look at others, too.  That, of course, was when I thought I had seen that DeJesus was $10MM a year.  $5MM a year, not as bad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 20, 2012, 08:01:03 pm
I agree that the amount of money exacerbated people's negative judgement of Soriano, just as it did that of Zambrano.

It is too early to tell, but so far, it doesn't look like Epstein has as much tendency as Hendry to overpay.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 20, 2012, 10:42:45 pm
The big overpayments for Hendry came in 2006 and the 2006-2007 off-season, when ownership essentially told him to buy a pennant for 2007.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 21, 2012, 12:42:20 pm
MLB.com top ten 1B prospects

1. Anthony Rizzo, Cubs: Rizzo's big league debut in 2011 may not have gone very well, but that didn't mean his left-handed bat wasn't still in high demand. Cubs general manager Jed Hoyer, who helped draft Rizzo in Boston and then traded for him while the GM in San Diego, acquired him in Chicago during the offseason. A solid defender at first, it's Rizzo's power bat (51 homers and 200-plus RBIs over the past two seasons in the Minors) that is his calling card. Look for him to make some adjustments and be ready for the big leagues in 2012, even if he starts the year in Triple-A behind Bryan LaHair.

10. Dan Vogelbach, Cubs: Coming out of high school, Vogelbach was on radars because of his light-tower power from the left side. It's legitimately plus-plus, and he can hit it out to all fields. Vogelbach is not an all-or-nothing swinger, either, and his advanced approach should allow him to be a fairly complete hitter. Non-athletic would be a kind way to describe Vogelbach's body type in high school, but he's already trimmed down as he prepares for his first season of pro ball.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120119&content_id=26391492&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120119&content_id=26391492&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb)

Included in the link is a brief Rizzo video
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on January 21, 2012, 02:44:44 pm
Hey, there's something you don't see every day -- two Cubs in the top ten at one position in a prospect ranking report.

Even though that's just an MLB.com list, it's still pretty impressive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 21, 2012, 02:57:12 pm
Did they rate center fielders?  I don't remember seeing it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 21, 2012, 03:22:36 pm
Did they rate center fielders?  I don't remember seeing it.

From the website, it appears they haven't ranked any of the OF prospects yet for this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 21, 2012, 03:43:00 pm
I wouldn't be surprised if both Jackson and Ceasar made the CF list.  If there is just an outfielder list, perhaps neither would make it.

If the Cubs system has any strengths, it is in CF and perhaps relief pitchers.  And now first base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 21, 2012, 04:10:27 pm
If the Cubs system has any strengths, it is in CF and perhaps relief pitchers.  And now first base.

I thought it was the front office, and what will soon be a sound, management-driven organizational philosophy....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on January 21, 2012, 04:19:23 pm
If they don't do OF by position, Jackson will still make the list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 21, 2012, 05:26:19 pm
MLB.com's Top 50 Prospects list has been expanded to 100. The 2012 version will be unveiled on Wednesday on MLB.com as well as on a one-hour show on MLB Network, airing at 10 p.m. ET.

With the top ten lists for 2Bs and pitchers not yet announced, there aren't enough days left to do the outfield positions individually.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 21, 2012, 06:03:02 pm
I thought it was the front office, and what will soon be a sound, management-driven organizational philosophy....

Since we were talking about the top 10 list for each position, I thought you would realize that I was talking about the players, not the management.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 21, 2012, 07:45:24 pm
Since my post was pretty clearly sarcasm, and not even sarcasm directed at you, I thought you would realize that I was joking and not serious.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 21, 2012, 08:41:43 pm
Sorry.  I misunderstood.

We got to start using purple.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 21, 2012, 10:11:49 pm
We got to start using purple.

Using punctuation is demanding enough for me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 22, 2012, 12:11:43 pm
MLB.com's top ten 2B prospects

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120120&content_id=26403738&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 22, 2012, 12:22:23 pm
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120120&content_id=26403738&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb

1. Cory Spangenberg, Padres: Spangenberg became a great example of the benefits of signing early -- getting out and racking up 330 plate appearances while many of his fellow 2011 first-rounders were sitting around and waiting to sign. He also showed that reports of his ability to hit were spot-on, as he put up impressive numbers in average and on-base percentage. Spangenberg also has plus speed that will allow him to continue to steal bases. He's already made the move to second base from third base full-time and should be just fine there. Spangenberg is on the fast track already, and to see him in Double-A at some point in 2012 seems very reasonable.

Too bad the idiot who wrote that piece fails to understand that it doesn't make a damb bit of difference whether a prospect signs as soon as he is drafted or waited until the deadline in mid-August.

An absolute non-factor.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 22, 2012, 12:53:38 pm
How about that.  Purple.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on January 22, 2012, 01:08:34 pm
I've always assumed that all of Jes' posts are meant to be in purple.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 22, 2012, 01:10:07 pm
How about that.  Purple.
DaveP=Mel Allen
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 22, 2012, 01:12:11 pm
Did you mean to use purple there?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 22, 2012, 02:02:43 pm
I've always assumed that all of Jes' posts are meant to be in purple.

Pretty good.  Actually a large number of them are.... just not the ones you think.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 23, 2012, 11:43:10 am
Brett Jackson is #5 on MLB top 10 OF prospects list.


http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120120&content_id=26407614&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120120&content_id=26407614&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 23, 2012, 12:06:52 pm
Domonic fell off the map, didn't he.  Of course, maybe he's no longer considered a prospect since he got some ML time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 30, 2012, 01:26:09 pm
Free agent corner outfielder Smaily Borges refused to take a drug test, triggering his suspension. The 28-year-old Cuban, whom the Cubs released on Dec. 12, played for low Class A Peoria last season and batted .233/.278/.353 in 133 at-bats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on January 30, 2012, 01:36:02 pm
There's something fishy about that guy...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 30, 2012, 02:34:57 pm
28 years old with a .631 OPS at Low-A...I'm sure the drug manufacturer is happy that he refused the test...whatever he was taking was definitely not getting it done!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 30, 2012, 02:51:52 pm
Assuming he was on something, he must really suck without them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 30, 2012, 06:24:14 pm
Just got my BA Prospect Handbook today.  Here are the rest of the Cub rankings.  Will try to get some scouting notes up here in the next day or two.

11.  Dae Eun Rhee
12.  Dallas Beeler
13.  Chris Carpenter (yuck)
14.  Zeke DeVoss
15.  Tony Zych
16.  Marco Hernandez
17.  Reggie Golden
18.  Jae Hoon Ha
19.  Robert Whitenack
20.  Jeimer Candelario
21.  Steve Clevenger
22.  Jose Rosario
23.  Logan Watkins
24.  Jeff Beliveau
25.  Ben Wells
26.  Marcus Hatley
27.  Casey Weathers
28.  Tawian Easterling
29.  Hayden Simpson
30.  Shawon Dunston, Jr.
31.  Pin Chieh Chen
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on January 30, 2012, 06:40:40 pm
They must have a lot of faith in Simpson's ability......I'm kidding of course.

The surprises there to me is Rosario. On the other hand, Willengton Cruz is nowhere to be found.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on January 30, 2012, 06:55:43 pm
I'm surprised that Hayden Simpson is on the list at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 30, 2012, 08:11:55 pm
I've actually got simpson pretty high on my list.  Top 20 for sure.  We don't have many good rotation prospects, IMO.  Call me a dope, but I don't think it means much if a guy wasn't any good pitching with a stress fracture in his elbow.  I don't think Sabbathia or Lincecum would be very good with a fractured elbow either; that doesn't mean they wouldn't be likely to be good again if/when healthy. So I'm partly inclined to think that if he's healthy, other than time wasted he's perhaps not much different than the prospect he was when drafted. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on January 30, 2012, 08:21:38 pm
That list totally fails the "Who would you be more upset about losing?" test.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on January 30, 2012, 08:36:53 pm
I've actually got simpson pretty high on my list.  Top 20 for sure.  We don't have many good rotation prospects, IMO.  Call me a dope, but I don't think it means much if a guy wasn't any good pitching with a stress fracture in his elbow.  I don't think Sabbathia or Lincecum would be very good with a fractured elbow either; that doesn't mean they wouldn't be likely to be good again if/when healthy. So I'm partly inclined to think that if he's healthy, other than time wasted he's perhaps not much different than the prospect he was when drafted. 

I agree with this.  I wouldn't be surprised if he's top 10 next year if he is truly healthy this year.  I also actually think not having his "stuff" last year could help him be a better pitcher in the long run...to have to learn have to pitch without it, even if he wasn't all that successful doing it.  Once again, this is predicated on him being healthy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 30, 2012, 08:53:04 pm
Along with Rosario, Hatley's inclusion is a surprise to me.  No love for soft tossing Jokisch, Wang, Beeler, or Rusin. I thought one of those 4 might be listed in the upper 20's. 

I'm surprised Kurcz was left out.  He was #25 last year, and I thought he'd be around there this year.

BA must view Amaya as a tweener.

While I'm not surprised, I'm kind of disappointed Burke didn't make it.

.. and of course we all hoped Penalver from VZ or some other mysterious DR/VZ type would me it too.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 30, 2012, 09:08:51 pm
Along with Rosario, Hatley's inclusion is a surprise to me.  No love for soft tossing Jokisch, Wang, Beeler, or Rusin. I thought one of those 4 might be listed in the upper 20's. 

I'm surprised Kurcz was left out.  He was #25 last year, and I thought he'd be around there this year.

BA must view Amaya as a tweener.

While I'm not surprised, I'm kind of disappointed Burke didn't make it.

.. and of course we all hoped Penalver from VZ or some other mysterious DR/VZ type would me it too.





Dallen, Beeler is #12.  That seems like plenty of love.

JR, he's one of the guys whose report I'd like to read.  He was very effective at Peoria, as an inexperienced control guy; then he was totally overmatched at AA, with hits and HR's galore and no K's.  So is he a guy with a really pretty serious velocity who, if he could tighten up his slider, develop a change, work up a cutter, and simply learn to nibble more instead of just gunning fastballs in the zone, does he have a chance?  Or is he just a guy with average stuff who could get away with fastballs against weak Midwest Leaguers? 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 30, 2012, 09:15:57 pm
Sometimes BA, and perhaps Fleita or whomever else they have within the org who shares their thoughts, has a hard time readjusting their rankings. 

Logan Watkins, how can he be a prospect when he can't hit, with such a horrible K/HR ratios?  If you want to be good, you should either hit for some power or some average.  He's got no power, but how can you hit for average when you're whiffing all the time and getting no HR hits? 

Chris Carpenter, they liked him pre-draft so they can't let it go. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on January 31, 2012, 03:29:36 am
I'm surprised that Rhee didn't get plucked in the Rule 5 draft.  Pittsburgh, Houston .. what do they have to lose by keeping him in the pen all year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 31, 2012, 02:35:47 pm
It is fairly easy to pick the top 10 prospects in any system.  The next 20 are usually quite difficult, since they are extremely closely grouped together.  I think that with BAs list, it would be quite possible to invert the 11 through 30 prospects and make a legitimate case for each of them.

Did Simpson do badly because he was injured.  If so, and if he is now healthy, he should be near the top 10.  If he was bad, not because of his health, but because he stinks, he should't be in the list at all.  Every scout would probably have a different view of it.

This is especially true when so many of the prospects played in the DR or Mesa.  Will Candelario continue to hit for average and power?  If so, he is a top prospect.  Will he fall apart when he faces breaking balls in AA, then he shouldn't be on the list at all.

My personal surprise was where they placed Dunston Jr.  Obviously, the Cubs considered him equal to a top draft choice, based upon the money they paid him.  If he had been drafted in the second round, and given the same money, he would be near the top 10.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 31, 2012, 02:36:48 pm
I am also surprised that Rhee was not selected in the rule 5 draft.  Obviously, most teams were scared away because Jeff pronounced him to be "not a prospect".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 31, 2012, 03:51:42 pm
Rhee will be 23 before the season starts, has never pitched above A ball, and lost a season to TJ surgery, If he had been taken in the Rule 5 draft and mothballed at the back of the bullpen, he'd be starting in AA in 2013 at age 24, covered with rust. He's a decent pitching prospect, but not a future top-of-rotation guy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on January 31, 2012, 05:42:22 pm
Quote
Did Simpson do badly because he was injured.  If so, and if he is now healthy, he should be near the top 10.

Except that Baseball America may not have thought much of his talent when healthy. Remember, they thought he was a huge reach in the 1st round.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on January 31, 2012, 05:59:23 pm
Quote
Rhee will be 23 before the season starts, has never pitched above A ball, and lost a season to TJ surgery, If he had been taken in the Rule 5 draft and mothballed at the back of the bullpen, he'd be starting in AA in 2013 at age 24, covered with rust. He's a decent pitching prospect, but not a future top-of-rotation guy.

I don't think anyone has any idea what kind of pitcher Rhee can be. Surgery basically cost him two full seasons and then he had a rehab year. Kerry Wood had his elbow surgery when he was in the majors at 20 which was young enough to be in A-ball. After a year out and then a rehab season Wood went on to be a very good pitcher before the shoulder issues crept up.

Rhee's K's and BB's the last two months have to be encouraging. They're the kind of stats to look at for a return of stuff and command.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 31, 2012, 07:11:05 pm
Rhee will be 23 before the season starts, has never pitched above A ball, and lost a season to TJ surgery, If he had been taken in the Rule 5 draft and mothballed at the back of the bullpen, he'd be starting in AA in 2013 at age 24, covered with rust. He's a decent pitching prospect, but not a future top-of-rotation guy.

Most pitchers on all teams are not top-of-the-rotation guys, and yet are rather sought after.  Lilly was hardly top-of-the-rotation calibre.  Nor is Dempster.  And some people even claim that Garza is not.  Yet all of them could make almost every rotation in baseball.

A team like the Pirates could give Rhee enough innings in relief to keep the rust off of him, and would end up with an interesting, if not top-of-the-rotation prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 01, 2012, 12:26:12 am
I wasn't demeaning Rhee. If he continues to pitch as well as he did late last year, he could even be a September call-up this year, although mid-2013 seems more likely. But if he only pitched 45-60 innings out of another team's bullpen (mostly in a mop-up role) in 2012, he'd probably need the full 2013 season in AA just to get back on track as a starting pitcher, and would still need some AAA seasoning in 2014.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 01, 2012, 07:01:39 am
We'll see with Rhee.  It's been a lot of years since his surgery.  Did it take him 3 years to recover his arm strength, and now he's got a good arm? 

Or is his stuff fairly average, but he happened to get in a groove down the stretch, but is still just an average arm? 

I don't ever recall much talk about his fastball being "heavy" or "great movement" or "sinking" or any of that.  If he's basically working with a kind of straight perhaps 4-seam fastball, and it barely touches 95 once a month, we may still be dealing with an effectively sub-average fastball.  There are plenty of big-leaguers with sub-average fastballs, of course.  But I'm still kind of uncertain about what Rhee really has. 

We'll see. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 01, 2012, 09:31:35 am
The reports I have on him dating back before his surgery was that he coasted at 90 - 91 with much better than average command, and had a killer change up, which was far and away his "out" pitch.  He also threw a slider and cut fastball that was quite advanced for his level.  He was the kind of pitcher that Cubs management and fans frown upon, but seem to have success with other teams.  With the Cubs bringing in Travis Wood and Volestat(SP?), perhaps current Cubs management has a different view.

A lot of pitchers come back after Tommy John surgery.  A lot of pitchers fail to come back after Tommy John surgery.  time will tell
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 01, 2012, 09:44:57 am
A resting velocity at 90-91, with not infrequent 92-93 and an occasional 94-95 is a good fastball for a 2-seamer/sinker with excellent movement/sink/command.  It's usually not a very good asset fastball if it's a fairly straight 4-seamer.  You can live with a straightish 4-seamer at 90-91 most of the time, of course, if you've got really good command and really good other pitches (cutter, splitter/change, slider/curve).  So if a 4-seam 90-91 fastball is your worst pitch, you've got a pretty good chance. 

But I guess I'm thinking that if you've got a 4-seamer that works mostly in the 89-92 range, if you're going to be good it's going to in spite of the fastball, not because of it. 

I'm by no means saying that Rhee has a mediocre 4-seamer that works at 89-92.  Maybe he's got a 4-seamer that hits 95 when he wants, and he's living on a very active 2-seamer at 89-92 which is very effective.  I don't know.  Time will tell. 

I think it's also obvious that if Rhee was coasting at 90-91 as a teenager, and if the TJ was perfectly restorative, the expectation back then was that he'd mature into more than 90-91.  Perhaps that has happened. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on February 01, 2012, 01:45:21 pm
On my top prospect list, i believe i had dunston jr listed in the 20-25 range, mainly because i had not seen him play and what reports i had heard, were not that exciting. I do however, feel he will surprise some of the experts and move up the ladder pretty quick.
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on February 01, 2012, 08:39:18 pm
Last week, I heard Bronson Arroyo (Reds) on MLB Network talking about his fastball and what he said was interesting to me.   He said that last season (in which he was pretty solid) he was down to 86-88 in the last half of the season...he wasn't feeling great.   

He said he was hoping to stay up around 89-90 all of this season and he said that was plenty of velocity to be a good starter, provided movement and location are real good.   

He also said that if movement and location aren't real good, 95 isn't nearly enough!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 01, 2012, 09:37:29 pm
There are a lot of pitchers that were rather successful with an 89 - 91 fastball.

Maddux comes to mind.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 01, 2012, 09:56:20 pm
A few notes from the BA Handbook . . .

Rhee - Finally began to regain previous form in 2011, pitched at 88-92 mph for most of the year before adding 2 mph in final month. Added more power to breaking ball, change is best pitch at times.  Generally throws strikes and works bottom of the zone.  Could become #3 starter.

Beeler - Had Tommy John surgery following 2009 college season. Has been worked carefully, only being allowed to pitch more than 5 innings once in the first half of the season. Has more plus pitches (three) than career wins (two). 88-93 mph fastball that induces groundouts, hard curve, and change with nifty sink. Throws across his body.  Needs to refine command. Good athlete who was WR on two state championship HS football teams.  Will be turned loose in 2012.  Could become #3 starter.

Carpenter - Permanently moved to bullpen after throwing 94-100 mph in 2010 Arizona Fall League. Command and control regressed this past year. Had trouble adjusting to routine of being a reliever. By end of the year, he realized he could sit in the mid-90's and touch triple digits without selling out for velocity. Has tightened his slider and doesn't use change much anymore as a reliever.

DeVoss - All the tools to be a leadoff hitter, with on base ability and speed. Won't hit for much power. Has quickness, hands, and arm for second base, and has the wheels and instincts to handle CF if 2B conversion doesn't work.

Zych - Top prospect in Cape Cod League in 2010. Usually pitches at 94-97 and touched 99. Has funky delivery that makes his FB seem quicker. Scouts think delivery adds stress to shoulder. Mid 80's slider flattens out some of the time.

M. Hernandez - Ranks as better prospect than Amaya because he has a better chance to stay at SS. Better from left side of the plate than right side. Enough bat speed for gap power and plus speed to beat out bunts. First step quickness and above average arm give him a chance to stay at short. Needs to improve throwing accuracy. Would have finished with top fielding pct for SS's in AZL if he had qualified.

Golden - Has one of the highest ceilings among Cub prospects. Impressive bat speed and physical strength compared to Kevin Mitchell. Made strides with approach and discipline last year but still swings and misses a lot. Good athlete who's slow out of the box but has good speed once underway. Very strong arm that plays in RF.

Whitenack - Added 15 pounds between 2010 and 2011 and stuff got stronger as well. FB jumped to 89-94 with high of 96 while maintaining hard sink. Traded knuckle curve for low 80's slider and has effective change. Induces groundouts with tall frame and downward plane. Might have pitched his way to Chicago at end of last year if he hadn't gotten hurt. Possible #3 starter.

Candelario - Advanced approach for age as he's patient, recognizes pitches, and uses entire field. Impressive bat speed from both sides of plate. Projects as plus hitter with at least average power. Thick legs and below average speed, will have to watch conditioning as he gets older. Hands and arm to play third, although he may slow down and move to first base eventually. Needs to have better footwork and be better prepared as pitcher delivers ball to plate on defense. Will play in Arizona League this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 01, 2012, 10:17:18 pm
Clevenger - Excels at putting bat on the ball. Can drive balls to gaps. Has added power as legs have gotten stronger from catching. Tennessee manager and former big league catcher Brian Harper says Clevenger is one of the best receivers he's ever seen. Solid arm strength and can make accurate throws. Improved ability to block balls and manage a pitching staff. Below average speed but smart baserunner. Could play 1B or 3B if necessary. Profiles more as quality backup than regular.

Rosario - FB jumped to 93-97 this past year. One scout saw him throw five consecutive 97 mph fastballs in one start. Good life on FB as well. Has chance to develop plus slider, though currently known more for mid 80's velocity than bite. Change is even more rudimentary. Scouts wonder if he can stay a starter in the long run (My comment - This really seems to be a theme with all Cub hard throwing pitchers doesn't it???). Lack of size may not be conducive to durability as starter. Ceiling of #3 starter or setup man.

Watkins - Batted .310/.373/.450 after a very slow first 20 games in Daytona and led FSL with 12 triples. Has gotten less pull conscious. Selective but could draw more walks. Adept bunter. At 2B, has plus range, soft hands, and solid arm. Has gotten job done in CF and SS as well. Profiles more as utility man than starter unless he maintains offensive progress he made in 2011.

Beliveau - Attacks hitters with 88-91 FB which generates swings and misses because it looks like it is coming out of his sleeve. Deceptive change and mixes in curve. Led SL relievers in fewest unintentional walks per 9 IP and didn't not walk a single left handed batter in 100 plate appearances. Can get right handers out so could be more than just a lefty specialist.

Wells - Heavy sinker with 3.8 GO/FB ratio in 2011. Threw it at 87-90 early in season and jumped to 90-94 in August. Hard slider could be a plus pitch and change could be solid third offering. Has soft body but is athletic and repeats his delivery well. Uncommon mound presence for teenager.

Hatley - Looks part of late inning reliever. Big and throws hard, working at 92-97 mph. Hammer curveball. Cutter/slider could also be a solid pitch. Control and command aren't all the way back yet after Tommy John surgery.

Weathers - Has regained two power pitches since Tommy John surgery. Live FB sits at 95-98 with 86-88 slider. Both are wildly inconsistent. Mixes in below average change. Could be late inning reliever in majors.

Easterling - Like Szczur, surprised the Cubs by showing little baseball rust after juggling two sports in college. Despite only 138 college AB's, he handled Low-A pitching in pro debut, with good hand eye coordination and ability to repeatedly barrel the baseball.  Ball explodes off bat in batting practice so could develop average power. Must improve plate discipline, which could come with experience. Plus-plus runner before rupturing Achilles tendon in 2009 and has lost half step since. Fearless defender in CF with solid arm and plus range.

Simpson - Lost 25 pounds on already skinny frame after mono. Never complained of soreness but FB resided in low 80's most of the year. Postseason MRI showed he pitched through stress fracture and small tear in elbow which have healed. When healthy, has pair of hard breaking balls, promising change, and solid command. Cubs thought they were drafting Roy Oswalt, but at this point, they're just hoping he'll stay healthy in 2012.

Dunston - Had bat wrap that hampered him his senior year in HS, but Cubs have ironed it out in instructional league. Raw and needs time to develop, but Cubs think he'll be solid hitter with average or better power. No questions on speed. Projects as basestealer and plus defender in CF. Strong arm, although not in his dad's legendary class. Strong passion for the game. Could start in Boise in June.

Chen - Uses slash-and-dash approach that Ichiro made famous. Some of best hand-eye coordination in Cubs system. Should hit for average in higher levels. Barrels balls easily but probably won't have more than gap power because he lacks physical projection. Above average speed.  Moved to CF last summer. No reason he can't be solid defender with arm strength to match as he gains more experience.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 01, 2012, 10:32:43 pm
In their blurb about Amaya being their sleeper prospect, they mentioned he may lack the quickness for shortstop.

Also here are the prospect depth charts.  A few names I'm unfamiliar with are in bold.  Maybe someone keeping up with international prospects can fill me in.

Left Field - Garrett Schlect and Kyung-Min Na

Center Field - Jackson, Sczcur, Ha, Easterling, Dunston, Chen, Trey Martin, Elieser Bonne, and Kelvin Encarnacion

Right Field - Golden, Nelson Perez, John Andreoli

Third Base - Baez, Lake, Vitters, Candelario, Dustin Geiger, Trevor Gretzky, Ricardo Marcano

Shortstop - M. Hernandez, Wes Darvill, Carlos Penalver, Elliot Soto, Arismendy Alcantara, Luis Acosta

Second Base - DeVoss, Watkins, Rubi Silva, Gioskar Amaya, Jeff Bianchi, Matt Cerda

First Base - Vogelbach, Justin Bour, Rock Shoulders, Richard Jones, Paul Hoilman

Catcher - W. Castillo, Clevenger, Micah Gibbs, Neftali Rosario, Rafael Lopez, Justin Marra, Mark Malave

LH Starters - Chris Rusin, Brooks Raley, Frank del Valle, Austin Kirk, Willengton Cruz, Eric Jokisch, Graham Hicks, Brian Smith

LH Relievers - Beliveau, Scott Maine, John Gaub, Jeffry Antigua, Casey Harman, Kyler Burke

RH Starters - McNutt, Maples, Rhee, Beeler, Whitenack, Rosario, Wells, Simpson, Ryan Searle, Yao-Lin Wang, Jay Jackson, Starlin Peralta, Luis Liria, Tayler Scott, Austin Reed, Michael Jensen, Jose Arias, Nick Struck

RH Relievers - Dolis, Carpenter, Zych, Hatley, Weathers, Kevin Rhoderick, Alberto Cabrera, Lendy Castillo, Aaron Kurcz, Blake Parker, Kyle Smit, Larry Suarez, A.J. Morris, Frank Batista, P.J. Francescon
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 02, 2012, 12:48:08 am
Bonne is a 24 year old Cuban defector.  I don't know anything about him, but his numbers are not very impressive given his age in the DR league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on February 02, 2012, 12:56:54 am
3.8 go/ao for Wells? That's crazy. I'm most encouraged by his report.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on February 02, 2012, 06:35:37 am
Thanks much, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 02, 2012, 07:36:55 am
Last week, I heard Bronson Arroyo (Reds) on MLB Network talking about his fastball and what he said was interesting to me.   He said that last season (in which he was pretty solid) he was down to 86-88 in the last half of the season...he wasn't feeling great.   

He said he was hoping to stay up around 89-90 all of this season and he said that was plenty of velocity to be a good starter, provided movement and location are real good.   

He also said that if movement and location aren't real good, 95 isn't nearly enough!

Exhibit 1 -- Kyle Farnsworth
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on February 02, 2012, 04:01:22 pm
Plans for the new Dominican Cubs Academy:

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120202&content_id=26549778&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on February 02, 2012, 04:48:49 pm
The question raised on another board was whether the new CBA would mean that other teams could pick the fruit off the vine before the Cubs could.  If so, why are we training players for other teams?

The school is needed as much for academics as athletics.  Conditions there are horrible.

I wonder if the curriculum will include "Birth Certificates 101"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 02, 2012, 05:20:20 pm
Sounds pretty nice.  A premium academy, he said $6-8 million.  That's perhaps a better value than John Grabow. 

With two Dominican teams, the Cubs will typically have 60 guys on those two teams alone.  So housing for 80 hardly seems superfluous. 

I'd think too that with the new CBA limits, perhaps everybody will need to limit their spending.  Just as in salary-cap leagues like NBA and NFL, there may no longer be such widely varient dollar offers to players.  If there is a greater leveling of bonus offers, perhaps having premium facilities and a premium reputation for quality might mean that when you make a competitive dollar offer, kids will choose you.  You may not need to outbid on every kid if ties tend to go your way. 

Of course, everything changes.  What looks to be premium now, by the time it's built maybe other teams will be building bigger and better also.  And perhaps five years out the facilities will be middle-of-the-pack. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 02, 2012, 05:29:02 pm
JR, thanks a million!  Great stuff.  The Rhee and Beeler notes were encouraging.  The Beeler spin that he's got three plus pitches, including a hard curve, is surprising.  His absence of K's in AA would suggest that neither his curve nor his change are sharp enough to make many hitters miss.  But, people can change, and given his inexperience, perhaps he just needs to work at it.  This was his first full-season pro summer.  So perhaps he'll be a little stronger, a little faster, and a little sharper this year.  perhaps also he'll be a little shrewder.  Perhaps the strategy of just throwing a lot of fastballs for strikes to control the count works in Midwest League, especially in the cold spring, because no hitters there can punish you.  But doing that in summer Southern League, he was giving up HR's in particular and hits in general at an unacceptable rate.  Maybe he'll learn to nibble a little more this year, to his advantage. 

Or, who knows, maybe he'll mix in a good cutter and it will help him a lot!  heh heh.     
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 02, 2012, 05:47:54 pm
JR,

Encarnacion played in the DSL and had 9 triples in 123 AB's with one of the teams.

Jose Arias is the big, supposedly hard-throwing RH that had some exciting stats (50-8 K/BB ratio in 43 IP). He was 20-years-old, however.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 02, 2012, 10:32:57 pm
Plans for the new Dominican Cubs Academy:

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120202&content_id=26549778&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc

I wonder if there is any chance the Cubs will also use the Dominican Academy as a training facility for other athletic, raw prospect international signings which are NOT from Latin America.

If the Cubs sign someone who has nice athletic ability, but has played little or even no competitive baseball, they will need to put him somewhere to not only teach him the game, but to give him the depth of experience needed to have any chance of success in the minors.

If they do, that would be a truly aggressive approach, and might be a way to manufacture some pretty nice players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 02, 2012, 10:40:49 pm
jes, I think to some degree they may have already done that.  My understanding was that they signed a catcher from italy last year, and I thought he was maybe at the Dominican site? 

They also have American kids go down there during the offseason and spend considerable time.  Gives them more baseball time under instructional conditions, and gives them the cross-cultural experience that might make them more appreciative and more helpful to the Latin kids who come over here. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 02, 2012, 10:52:21 pm
My understanding was that the Italian was sent to the academy in Australia, although my memory on the subject is vague, and it is really unimportant.  The Cubs HAVE sent some to academies that are not in their native land, and might well send some to the DR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 02, 2012, 10:59:28 pm
If the Cubs have a similar academy facility in Australia, it would probably make more sense to send non-Latin players there, to learn English as well as baseball.  In the Dominican, they would be learning baseball, and Spanish and presumably English all at the same time.  Just nice to see the Cubs go with that kind of an aggressive approach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 03, 2012, 08:24:03 am
Watkins - Batted .310/.373/.450 after a very slow first 20 games in Daytona and led FSL with 12 triples. Has gotten less pull conscious. Selective but could draw more walks. Adept bunter. At 2B, has plus range, soft hands, and solid arm. Has gotten job done in CF and SS as well. Profiles more as utility man than starter unless he maintains offensive progress he made in 2011.

Watkins has seemed to me like a poor investment of $500K, but the idea of making him a super utility man seems to be kind of intriguing. 

I'm trying to remember who this guy was, but it seems like there was a guy in the 90's who was a speedster type who put up a good OBP and played all over the place (FP Santangelo was the first thought that popped in my head, but I believe the guy I'm trying to think of had more speed and was just a better player than him.).  Chone Figgins is another guy who maybe comes to mind.

Maybe I should start thinking of Watkins as a future supersub instead of a hopeful regular at short or second base.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 03, 2012, 08:46:00 am
Watkins has seemed to me like a poor investment of $500K, but the idea of making him a super utility man seems to be kind of intriguing. 

I'm trying to remember who this guy was, but it seems like there was a guy in the 90's who was a speedster type who put up a good OBP and played all over the place (FP Santangelo was the first thought that popped in my head, but I believe the guy I'm trying to think of had more speed and was just a better player than him.).  Chone Figgins is another guy who maybe comes to mind.

Maybe I should start thinking of Watkins as a future supersub instead of a hopeful regular at short or second base. 

Might the player you are thinking of be Tony Phillips?  http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/phillto02.shtml

Watkins was a 21st round pick.  If they can end up with a supersub out of him, that would end up being a very successful draft pick.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 03, 2012, 08:50:43 am
Might the player you are thinking of be Tony Phillips?  http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/phillto02.shtml

Watkins was a 21st round pick.  If they can end up with a supersub out of him, that would end up being a very successful draft pick.

Yeah, that's exactly who I was trying to think of.  Thanks jes!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 03, 2012, 09:41:46 am
Phillips was an extremely undervalued player.  He put up a career OBP of .374, scored 1300 career runs, with four seasons over 100 and one when he led the league.  He also played more than 290 games at each of the following positions: 2b/SS/3B/LF.  And another 169 in RF and 97 in CF.  40 of his games at SS came in his final season.

The guy provided tremendous flexibility to a roster, and great depth insurance at 6 different positions, and was a pretty good leadoff hitter.

While he was fast, he was never a great SB threat, topping out at 19 in his best SB season.

With a top salary of $4.3M and only two seasons as high as S2.4M, he was also generally a great value.

And, judging from his power surge at age 35, hitting 19 HR at 35 and then 27 more HR at 36, when he had previously topped 10 HR only once, he may also have been a doper.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/phillto02.shtml
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 03, 2012, 10:57:20 am
Philips was really valuable.  Of course, as jes notes, being able to hit lots of HR's was a big factor.  He hit 160 HR's, and had a career OPS of .763, with four straight years in the .800's.  His career K/HR was 1499/160, less than 10/1. So he had a lot of HR hits, which count toward slugging, OPS, batting average, and OBP. 

Watkins's problem is that he K's like a slugger.   Hard to make it as an OBP guy without a good batting average, and hard to hit for average if 20% of your AB's are K's but you don't have some HR hits to offset that. 

Last year was a big step for him:  he improved his K/HR from 97K/1HR to 97K/5HR.  If he could get his K/HR down toward the 10:1 range, he's got a shot.  But that's pretty unlikely.  Guys who whiff so much in A-ball usually always whiff frequently. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 03, 2012, 11:35:25 am
Watkins reminds me of Dwayne Bacon.  If you are going to strike out a lot, you better hit home runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on February 03, 2012, 02:26:52 pm
Cubs sign Ryan Rowland-Smith to a minor legue deal.

http://www.bleachernation.com/2012/02/03/chicago-cubs-sign-ryan-rowland-smith-to-a-minor-league-contract/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 03, 2012, 03:32:26 pm
Cubs' Parker Getting Back On Track

By Phil Rogers
February 3, 2012
 (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/email.gif)E-mail (?subject=Baseball America: Cubs%27%20Parker%20Getting%20Back%20On%20Track&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseballamerica.com%2Fonline%2Fmajors%2Forganization-reports%2Fchicago-cubs%2F2012%2F2612899.html) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/print.gif)Print (http://bbf.createaforum.com/javascript:window.print())
 
CHICAGO—Age isn't on Blake Parker's side. He's 26 and failed to take advantage of his time on the 40-man roster when the man in charge was Jim Hendry, not Theo Epstein.

But Parker has doggedly kept pushing for another look and strengthened his case for big league consideration with a strong winter in the Mexican Pacific League. He was a workhorse in Hermosillo, adding 28 appearances to his 53 between Double-A Tennessee and Triple-A Iowa during the 2011 season.

More importantly, Parker remained consistent with an improved slider, which he had used to hold Triple-A hitters to a .201 average last season. He used it to help produce a .195 opponent average in Mexico, which is traditionally a hitter's league.

"He got himself in good shape, and he got his slider going," farm director Oneri Fleita said. "He really put it together at the end of the year. The last two and a half months, he really firmed up, and he carried it into winter ball."

Fleita said that after Parker won a spot on the 40-man roster prior to the 2010 season, he struggled with his slider. He had trouble throwing it for strikes and when he did it was often flat, staying on one plane. He has made it a much improved pitch, and that has made him a better pitcher.

"Now he's got it," Fleita said. "Going to Mexico didn't hurt either. In trying to get a little better with your breaking ball, that's the league to go to . . . He's a very mature kid. He always had good mound presence, a good feel for the game. Now maybe he's learned to control his emotions a little bit. He's an interesting guy."

The Cubs had not announced their list of non-roster invites for spring training, but Parker seems likely to be on it. Even if he isn't, he could be used in some spring games as Epstein and general manager Jed Hoyer consider whether he could add depth for the major league staff.

Cubbyhole

• The Cubs went outside the organization to add Brandon Hyde as their minor league field coordinator and James Rowson as their minor league hitting coordinator. Hyde had spent the last year and a half as the Marlins' bench coach. Rowson had spent the last four years was the Yankees' minor league hitting instructor.

• Bill Buckner, who won a batting title with the 1980 Cubs, rejoined the organization as the hitting coach for short-season Boise. Buckner has made his home in Boise since retiring as a player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on February 03, 2012, 03:57:38 pm
Quote
The Cubs went outside the organization to add . . .

Nice.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on February 06, 2012, 02:23:07 pm
Brett Taylor seems to think Junior Lake’s 2011 was an aberration but he does waffle a little bit 
           
Quote from: Bleacher Nation
It won’t surprise you when I say that Lake’s scouting report reads like my admonition at the outset of this post. His talent is extreme, and there are reasons for excitement. But there are holes. There are concerns. For every reason to be excited, there are two reasons – statistically – that he won’t make it to the bigs.

That’s just the way it is with most prospects. It makes the prospecting game interesting and difficult. But also very important.
 
http://www.bleachernation.com/2012/02/06/excited-about-chicago-cubs-prospect-junior-lake-to-a-degree/ (http://www.bleachernation.com/2012/02/06/excited-about-chicago-cubs-prospect-junior-lake-to-a-degree/)

Two comments

He may have a rocket for an arm but I have to question how accurate it is.

Lake hit a ball in the AFL game I saw that may have been hit harder than any ball I've seen.  It made the sound that Bob Brenly talks about and then some.  The liner never got more than 15-20' off the ground but still carried over the CF's head
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 07, 2012, 02:02:35 pm
Quote from ArizonaPhil

I saw Adrian Cardenas play in the AFL a few years ago when he was an A's Top 10 Prospect, and I've seen him play versus the Cubs in Minor League Camp in March for about three years. I like Cardenas a lot.

Cardenas would be best described as an "offensive-first" super-sub (2B-3B-SS-LF) who is younger, slightly faster, and a bit more versatile than Blake DeWitt, so this would be a roster upgrade. The only thing DeWitt has over Cardenas is big league experience.

Although he is below-average defensively no matter where he plays (2B is his best spot), Cardenas CAN play SS (DeWitt cannot), and he has more upside than does DeWitt at this point in their respective careers.

I wouldn't want to play Cardenas at SS on a regular basis, but he can be a legitimate short-term replacement there if Sveum wants to give Castro a day off. And I would have no problem playing Cardenas at 2B.

Cardenas has two minor league options left (DeWitt has only one). is a year younger than DeWitt, and is (at least) three years away from arbritration, so this was a good waiver claim.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 08, 2012, 08:34:25 am
Keith Law's top 100 prospect list will be out sometime this morning.  Based on things he has said in the past, I expect that Rizzo will be somewhere in the top 25-30, Baez will be in the top 50, and Jackson will be somewhere on the back end of the list. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 08, 2012, 09:45:06 am
It's actually Keith Law's org rankings that are out today, and the prospects come tomorrow.  Here it is (Insider only):

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/hotstove11/story/_/id/7547640/san-diego-padres-best-farm-system-baseball-mlb

Here's the short Cubs write-up (he ranks them #20):

Quote
An unfairly maligned system, in my opinion -- not a great system, but not a disastrous one. And I say that as someone who's relatively bearish on some of the Cubs' more famous prospects.
 

I believe he's referring to Jackson and Szczur with that "bearish" comment, just FWIW. 

Also important is that the Padres system is ranked #1.  Very good news for the Cubs, given that the Padres system was weak before Hoyer/McLeod took over just a couple years ago.  Also, the first sentence says "Without Anthony Rizzo, they no longer have a top-25 prospect in their system..."  So it's safe to assume Law sees Rizzo as a top 25 prospect. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on February 08, 2012, 10:06:05 am

Wow!  They don't have a top 25 prospect, yet their whole system is ranked #1?  That's interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 08, 2012, 11:07:17 am
It certainly brings into question the belief that a good system is dependent upon how many potential impact prospects you have that are close to the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 08, 2012, 11:19:28 am
Here's the full write-up on the Padres, which explains why they're #1 despite a lack of elite prospects:

Quote
Without Anthony Rizzo, they no longer have a top-25 prospect in their system, but in terms of total future value of players likely to play significant roles in the big leagues, they're ahead of everyone else. Some of these players, especially from the 2011 draft, will develop into stars. But there are so many prospects here with high floors, players who would be top-10 or top-five in other systems but are 11-20 here (such as Robbie Erlin or Edinson Rincon), that they are well-positioned to compete even with modest major league payrolls during the next five to six years. Fans who were upset at the sudden departures of GM Jed Hoyer and assistant GM Jason McLeod for the Cubs should find solace in the fact that the prospects they helped bring into the system (along with many other scouts and execs, including Chris Gwynn, now with Seattle, and Jaron Madison and Randy Smith, still in San Diego) remain in place.

Tampa Bay is #2, but Law indicates you could argue they're #1 if you favor ceiling over probability.  Blue Jays are #3 and are named the most likely to be #1 next year.  The Cardinals and Royals round out the top 5.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 08, 2012, 11:23:07 pm
Law says the system is unfairly maligned, but without Rizzo Law himself probably ranks it in the mid to upper 20's.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 09, 2012, 08:55:16 am
It certainly brings into question the belief that a good system is dependent upon how many potential impact prospects you have that are close to the majors.

It also brings into question how much these ratings mean.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 09, 2012, 09:13:26 am
Law's top 100 (Insider only):

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7516084/mlb-top-100-prospects-2012-nos-1-25

Cubs on the list:

36.  Anthony Rizzo (38 last year)
89.  Brett Jackson (101-110 range last year)
95.  Javier Baez

McNutt was the only Cub to make the list last year, so this is an improvement.  And just because I know people will be wondering...Lee is #12, and Archer is #63.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 09, 2012, 09:14:49 am
Oh, and the Cubs top 10...he seems to be high on Cates:

Quote
1. Anthony Rizzo, 1B
2. Brett Jackson, OF
3. Javier Baez, SS
4. Trey McNutt, RHP
5. Zach Cates, RHP
6. Welington Castillo, C
7. Dillon Maples, RHP
8. Josh Vitters, 3B
9. Reggie Golden, OF
10. Matt Szczur, CF
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 09, 2012, 09:17:48 am
Wow, Cates at 5 and Golden at 9.  Kind of a reflection of how there is rarely real consensus in evaluating players. 

Of course, obviously some individual writer/media guy like Law or goldstein isn't actually watching Golden or Cates play repeatedly, or getting reports from a whole organization-full of twenty-some full-time scouts. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 09, 2012, 09:22:25 am
Actually, Law does spend a lot of time scouting them.  Here's his philosophy, from the introduction to the list:

Quote
When ranking players, I consider scouting reports on players -- usually my own, supplementing with conversations with other scouts and front-office executives as needed -- as well as performance, adjusted for age and context. I've made one adjustment in my ranking philosophy in recent years, favoring higher-upside prospects over lower-ceiling prospects who are closer to the majors. This better reflects how these players are valued now by front offices and scouting departments, and gives me a chance to deliver more information on prospects whose names or scouting reports might be new to you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 09, 2012, 09:32:52 am
BA had Cates as San Diego's #31 prospect in the BA Handbook.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on February 09, 2012, 10:37:24 am
Is he related to Nick Nolte?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on February 09, 2012, 11:45:42 am
I didn't realize Cates was such a promising prospect.  I guess I missed that somehow.  He was drafted in 3rd round and signed for 765,000 or double the recommended slot bonus(380,700).

Not many innings on his arm because he was mainly a catcher his freshmen year at NE Texas CC before taking to the mound his sophomore year.  He averaged 8.5 k's/9 to go along with a pretty bad walk ratio of 4bb/9 in A(full season...he skipped short-season) ball last year.  Reading up on him, he seems like someone that could really blossom once he gains more pitching experience.  I'm sure he's been mentioned here but, with all the Rizzo stuff at the time, I probably dismissed him as a throw in.

Considering Jed probably knows the Padres system really well, I bet he has a decent shot at being a + pitcher if he can improve his control.

scouting report(nice he didn't throw a single fastball under 90 all spring his sophomore year):

SCOUTING PROFILE: Of all the players who have a realistic shot of being selected before the second round this year, none has shot up draft boards more rapidly than Cates. Though he was recruited out of an Arkansas high school primarily as a pitcher, the 6-foot-3, 195-pound righthander wanted to both catch and pitch at the junior-college level, and actually spent most of his freshman season at Northeast Texas in a catching role. He was slated to be the No. 3 catcher at NTCC in 2009, freeing him to pitch, but one of the other catchers on the roster quit and the other got hurt, and the regular duties inadvertently fell to Cates. He rarely pitched, working less than 10 innings. Though Cates held his own at the plate, it was evident that his huge arm belonged on the mound, and he began the conversion to full-time pitcher last fall. Stronger and more physically mature than as a freshman, Cates has been so dominant this spring that he hasn’t thrown a single fastball under 90 mph, and peaked at 98. He generally sat in the 93-95 mph range, but was still humming along at 96 in the sixth inning of a combined no-hitter on April 7. As NTCC entered regional play in mid-May, Cates was 7-2, 2.54 with 91 strikeouts in 67 innings. Though his control is erratic and he walked 32, he was also overpowering, at times, and allowed just 45 hits. In addition to his big fastball, Cates has a second out-pitch in his changeup. His breaking ball remains a work in progress, but should be a solid pitch when he tightens the rotation. Cates is one of several rising junior-college prospects from around the country who committed this spring to Oklahoma State, but his sudden stature as a premium draft talent makes it unlikely he’ll step foot in a four-year college.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on February 09, 2012, 11:49:42 am
Is he related to Nick Nolte?

OK, that was pretty good.  Or pretty bad.  Not sure which.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on February 09, 2012, 11:53:57 am
That's often the case with my humor, Ron.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 09, 2012, 12:55:49 pm
Honestly, that's a very weak top 10 list.  Without Rizzo it would be downright ghastly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 09, 2012, 01:46:41 pm
One thing I had not noticed about Cates.  They kept him as a starter all year.  For some reason, I had just assumed that he was a reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 10, 2012, 08:48:10 am
Keith Law's prospect content today involves naming a sleeper prospect for each team.  Here's the Cubs write-up:

Quote
I was never a big Reggie Golden fan out of the draft. I saw an athletic kid with poor pitch recognition who could get tied up inside, but he has made adjustments faster than I anticipated, recognizing breaking balls better and playing stronger defense in right field. His main issue going forward will be conditioning, as he has a maintenance body with a low center of gravity, but I'm coming around on his chance to have some impact with the bat. Also keep an eye on center fielder Taiwan Easterling if you like extreme sleepers. He's a two-sport guy who had more at-bats after signing last June than he did the previous two seasons at Florida State combined.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on February 10, 2012, 09:04:51 am
"a low center of gravity" - A new way to describe an athlete that really does provide a visualization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 10, 2012, 11:13:56 am
It means he has large ankles.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on February 10, 2012, 11:14:26 am
"Taiwan Easterling" scores high on the DMF's List of Cool Names in the Cubs Minor Leagues.  Right up there with Rock Shoulders.  And Condor Cash (emeritus).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on February 10, 2012, 12:24:55 pm
Who has seen Golden?

Does he have a Brett Wallace body?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 10, 2012, 03:27:51 pm
Keith Law's prospect content today involves naming a sleeper prospect for each team.  Here's the Cubs write-up:
Quote
I was never a big Reggie Golden fan out of the draft. I saw an athletic kid with poor pitch recognition who could get tied up inside, but he has made adjustments faster than I anticipated, recognizing breaking balls better and playing stronger defense in right field. His main issue going forward will be conditioning, as he has a maintenance body with a low center of gravity, but I'm coming around on his chance to have some impact with the bat. Also keep an eye on center fielder Taiwan Easterling if you like extreme sleepers. He's a two-sport guy who had more at-bats after signing last June than he did the previous two seasons at Florida State combined.


During the actual season, Golden's K-rate was almost 30%, and that against lame short-season pitching.  And neither his K-rate nor BA rates improved much over the course of the season.  I'm hoping that Law saw Golden in Fall instrux, which seems very possible, and which suggests that Law's comments might be very encouraging.  But given his lousy K-rate and BA this summer overall, if Law's comments are based on having seen Golden in one of his hot stretches which he was unable to sustain, then it might not be very meaningful. 


But it would be pretty cool if Golden is learning how to hit.  His HR and walk rates were both fine, so if he was able to get his K-rate under control, he'd have a chance to become an interesting offensive prospect. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 10, 2012, 04:18:19 pm
As I remember ArizonaPhil's AFL comments, Golden started out great, went into a deep slump, and then came out of it to play pretty well.  But like Craig, I would like to see him have success at least in Peoria before I get too excited.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 10, 2012, 05:06:53 pm
Not to belabor this, Dave, but, well, maybe yes I do want to.  You're AzPhil remember is from when?  This fall?  Or from last spring? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 10, 2012, 08:31:13 pm
This past fall.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on February 11, 2012, 02:28:31 pm
Nice article by Muskat on Dillon Maples:

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120210&content_id=26644098&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 11, 2012, 06:42:54 pm
Interesting.  Sounds like a sharp kid.  Nice to see somebody working hard right away. 

Whether any of that will help him throw strikes, who knows. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on February 12, 2012, 07:10:38 am
Thanks for the link, Playtwo.  Good article. Interesting that Derek Jeter would be participating in that program.  That must be some rush for a kid to be thrown in with that group of guys in what sounds like a pretty intimate setting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 13, 2012, 06:56:32 am
One more top prospects list, supposedly available for free...Kevin Goldstein on Baseball Prospectus:

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=16020

Jackson is #44, Baez is #66, and Rizzo is #75.  Garza trade looks much better for the Cubs according to this list: Lee is #65, and Archer is unranked.  Padres have the most prospects on the list with 10.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 13, 2012, 10:55:51 am
Lee hit 318 in 400 at bats in A ball, and 190 in 100 at bats in AA, and has no current or projected power.  He is a good prospect, and I wish the Cubs still had him, but I don't see how BA justified ranking him among the 12 best prospects in baseball.  65 seems to be more reasonable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 13, 2012, 11:59:43 am
Maybe because Golg Glove caliber SS who project to hit .300 in the majors, draw walks and steal 40+ bases are relatively rare?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 13, 2012, 12:15:52 pm
Maybe because Golg Glove caliber SS who project to hit .300 in the majors, draw walks and steal 40+ bases are relatively rare?

Hitting .190 in 100 AA bats is generally not regarded as strong evidence of being able to hit .300 in the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 13, 2012, 01:07:58 pm
Maybe because Golg Glove caliber SS who project to hit .300 in the majors, draw walks and steal 40+ bases are relatively rare?

Will be interesting to see how he develops over time.  He's been a .290's hitter both years in full season, but with lots of K's and few HR's. 

He made a lot of progress last year.  HR's from 1 to 5, errors from 34 to 18.  SB got worse (32/7 to 33/16). 

Will be hard for him to hit .300 in the majors if he's still K'ing so much and having a K:HR ratio of > 20:1.  But he only turned 21 this offseason, so there is good reason to think he can get a lot stronger and improve as a hitter.  That's the projection game.  If he can get stronger and be a 10-15 HR hitter, he's going to have a good chance to hit for high average. 

Not sure how many guys get faster after age 21, though.  Perhaps his base-stealing smarts will improve.  But he hasn't been a base-stealing machine (32-33 is good, but not incredible in low-minors), and getting caught 1/3 of attempts this year isn't that promising. 

Will be interesting to see how his game develops as he gets older and plays versus high-minors/mlb competition from now on. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 13, 2012, 01:49:18 pm
Perhaps his base-stealing smarts will improve.  But he hasn't been a base-stealing machine (32-33 is good, but not incredible in low-minors), and getting caught 1/3 of attempts this year isn't that promising.

In his A+ league in 2011 he stole 28 bases in 97 games.  That was 7th best in the league.  The top SB figure was 43.  All of those with more steals played at least 9 more games than he did, and the leader at 35 more games than he did.  Adjust for games played, Lee would have had 38 steals if he had played the same # of games in that league, which would have had him only 5 steals behind the leader.  28 steals in 97 games is not going to cause anyone to forget about Rickey Henderson, but it is not a bad total.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 13, 2012, 03:24:57 pm
Lee's performance relative to age has been outstanding, especially considering he lost most of one season to injury.  SB % typically improves dramatically as guys learn the art of science of it, and Lee has the raw speed and smarts to be an elite base stealer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 13, 2012, 03:59:42 pm
Stealing bases if very important to me.  But most on the board, and for that matter currently in baseball, discount stolen bases greatly in relation to home run power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on February 13, 2012, 04:38:37 pm
Lee is clearly a prospect about whom there is a divergence of opinion, not only on this board but among people in the baseball business. It will be interesting to see how things play out with him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 13, 2012, 04:40:34 pm
Stolen bases are valuable, particularly early and late in the season when it's cold, at Wrigley when the wind's blowing in and in pitcher-friendly parks. But they require both a high OBP and a high SB success rate. Lee appears likely to develop both tools and excellent fielding skills.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on February 13, 2012, 04:47:00 pm
Life and baseball can be very funny.  Anyone betting that Lohse or Garland would have a longer and more productive career than Prior would have made a lot of money.

Likewise, who knows what will happen Lee v. Castro?  My money today would be on Castro.  But back then, it was on Prior.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 13, 2012, 08:04:31 pm
Stolen bases are valuable, particularly early and late in the season when it's cold, at Wrigley when the wind's blowing in and in pitcher-friendly parks. But they require both a high OBP and a high SB success rate.

Maury Wills was only 12-3 in steals in a full season of AA ball at age 23, and in the majors he had a career OBP of .330.

A high OBP certainly helps, but Bert Campanaris led the AL in steals 6 times, and only had an OBP above .321 in one of those seasons.  Willie Tavaras was 68-7 in steals one year with an OBP of .308.

Certainly a high OBP helps and can make a stolen base threat extremely valuable, but a stolen base threat can add serious value without a great OBP, and Wills would seem to indicate that tremendous stolen base totals in the minors are not absolutely essential either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 13, 2012, 08:24:20 pm
Base stealing is a learned skill. You have to get a good jump, know the tendencies of managers and pitchers, know the catcher's pop time and understand the game situation. Just being fast doesn't guarantee success.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 13, 2012, 09:04:51 pm
Being fast isn't enough, but being slow is a rather big handicap.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 14, 2012, 08:51:48 am
Jim Callis isn't nearly as bullish on our $7 million Cuban lefty as Kevin Goldstein . . .

Where would Cuban lefthander Gerardo Concepcion fit onto a revised Cubs prospect list? Is he worthy of the overall Top 100 Prospects list?

Matt Cummings
West Des Moines, Iowa

Though the Cubs gave Concepcion a $7 million major league contract, he projects more as a No. 4 starter than as a front-of-the-rotation option. The 19-year-old stands out more with his advanced feel for pitching than he does for his pure stuff. His fastball ranges from 86-92 mph and his curveball ranges from inconsistent to solid. "If everything works out," one scout said, "maybe he becomes Randy Wolf."

In the BA Grade system we introduced in the 2012 Prospect Handbook, Concepcion merits a 50/High. I'd put him at No. 19 on a revised Cubs Top 30, between outfielders Reggie Golden and Jae-Hoon Ha, and he's not a Top 100-caliber prospect.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on February 14, 2012, 09:12:43 am
Heard Josh Byrnes (Padres) talking on MLB Network re Cashner for Rizzo this a.m.

When asked what motivated him to want the trade, Brynes said that Padres liked Rizzo, but didn't feel he was a great fit for their ballpark since it's so hard to hit the ball out to right and right center at Petco. 

He went on to say that he's really liked Cashner's arm since college...and that he thinks Cashner will be real good in their pen this year and likely be able to take a starting role down the road.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 14, 2012, 10:48:24 am
That was one of the few trades that seemes to make sense for both teams.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on February 14, 2012, 11:17:06 am
Cubs seem to finally have some really exciting position player prospects, especially if Soler signs.  Jackson, Baez, Rizzo, Soler, Candelario, Vogelbach, Malave, Acosta, Hernandez, Yorrelis, Szczur, Golden, and even guys like Vitters, Castillo, and Lake to a lesser extent.  That's 15 that I can think of off the top of my head, but I'm sure I'm missing one or two guys that should also be on the watch list.  I love the depth of the position players in the system which finally seems to be going in the right direction. 

Now we need to do something about the pitching.  Hopefully we'll make some smart trades and have a really good draft in June.  All things being equal, I usually like to see the Cubs draft a position player in the first round because of the uncertainty that comes with pitchers and the likelyhood of them getting injured.  I'm hoping for a stud college pitcher with our pick this year though.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 14, 2012, 11:51:03 am
Cubs seem to finally have some really exciting position player prospects, especially if Soler signs.  Jackson, Baez, Rizzo, Soler, Candelario, Vogelbach, Malave, Acosta, Hernandez, Yorrelis, Szczur, Golden, and even guys like Vitters, Castillo, and Lake to a lesser extent.  That's 15 that I can think of off the top of my head, but I'm sure I'm missing one or two guys that should also be on the watch list.  I love the depth of the position players in the system which finally seems to be going in the right direction. 

And that is what they need, a boatload of high ceiling prospects.  Most of them will not amount to much, and many will never suit up in the majors.  But if you have enough of them, SOME will.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 14, 2012, 12:05:45 pm
PRCubsFan, some other hitters to follow include DeVoss, Torreyes, Ha, Penalver, Easterling and Chen.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 14, 2012, 12:28:44 pm
I thought I knew the system pretty well, but who is Yorrelis
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on February 14, 2012, 12:37:44 pm
I meant Torreyes.  I told you I was doing the list off the top of my head.  I'm surprised I was able to remember that many. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 14, 2012, 12:53:39 pm
There is no doubt that the Cubs over the past 5 years have changed their philosophy from concentrating mostly on pitchers to mostly mostly position players.  But it's success seems to be accelerated by the increase in procurement budget since Ricketts bought the club.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on February 14, 2012, 01:46:58 pm
The pitching emphasis was initiated by MacFail, trying to copy the Braves' pattern.  Hendry adopted it, until it became obvious that the system was severely deficient in position players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 14, 2012, 05:25:25 pm
The pitching emphasis was initiated by MacFail, trying to copy the Braves' pattern.  Hendry adopted it, until it became obvious that the system was severely deficient in position players.

Fixed that for you, Clark.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on February 14, 2012, 09:12:20 pm
LOL, DG!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 15, 2012, 11:57:51 am
Quote
Kevin_Goldstein Kevin Goldstein
The Cubs have released RHP Robinson Lopez, who was seen as a nice prospect when he came from Atlanta in the Derrek Lee deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on February 15, 2012, 12:23:16 pm
His K rate has plummeted...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 15, 2012, 12:41:52 pm
http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=lopez-006rob

An ERA of 4.37 in 92 innings of A ball at age 19, with 1.63 K for each walk and only 6.8 K/9 is generally not regarded as too nice of a prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 15, 2012, 01:03:58 pm
Who knows, health, work habits, fake age, whatever, but he wasn't improving or living up to the velocities that were reported for him the winter before we got him.  . 

But one thing with the increased activity internationally, the number of visas hasn't changed.  The window of opportunity is probably tighter now than it was 5 years ago. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 15, 2012, 07:58:43 pm
A must read, unless you occassionally have suicidal thoughts:

http://www.obstructedview.net/minor-leagues/the-future-cubs.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 15, 2012, 11:24:06 pm
A must read, unless you occassionally have suicidal thoughts:

http://www.obstructedview.net/minor-leagues/the-future-cubs.html

Ah, yes, 2002.... what a great future the Cubs had then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on February 16, 2012, 12:01:37 am
Theo/Jed/Jason will build much more depth and talent than the Cubs' system had in the early part of the last decade.

The overall plan/approach will be far more proactive and, before long, produce solid/balanced teams, which hasn't been the case in the past.

Our leaders think very differently, quite fortunately, than those from the past.

No one has a crystal ball, but i think our guys ARE going to get it done!

I'm not worried about that article or its premise one bit.   The past is the past.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 16, 2012, 12:04:49 am
Theo/Jed/Jason will build much more depth and talent than the Cubs' system had in the early part of the last decade.

The overall plan/approach will be far more proactive and, before long, produce solid/balanced teams, which hasn't been the case in the past.

Our leaders think very differently, quite fortunately, than those from the past.

No one has a crystal ball, but i think our guys ARE going to get it done!

I'm not worried about that article or its premise one bit.   The past is the past.

Hopefully, the new coaching philosophy will never incliude an edict from above along the lines of "leave David Kelton and his pretty swing alone."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 16, 2012, 12:55:52 am
I also hope they will not be reluctant to "reduce the hitter's natural aggressiveness".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 16, 2012, 07:09:28 am
Theo/Jed/Jason will build much more depth and talent than the Cubs' system had in the early part of the last decade.

The overall plan/approach will be far more proactive and, before long, produce solid/balanced teams, which hasn't been the case in the past. ....

I doubt they'll ever have the perception of quality that we had then.  You don't philosophize your way into talents like Prior.  It looked like we had an amazing ton of really high-end talent back then, and we had a lot of depth besides.  I don't think it will ever look like that again. 

But, we won't need to have such high rankings/perceptions to produce better actual results.  Everybody knows the attrition rate for prospects is substantial, but we got hit much harder than normal with that bunch. 

I'm an optimist, of course.  It's possible that the perception could upgrade somewhat quickly.  Suppose Rizzo and Jackson both are very, very productive at Iowa, but management is slow to call them up.  Suppose it's the end of June and they're both still in the minors.  We'll have another very high and certainly very high-perceived-potential draft pick in hand.  Suppose we sign Soler.  Suppose by the end of June both Baez and Vogelbach as well as Soler and Concepcion are all assigned to Peoria and all are looking good.  (As opposed to Baez hitting .275 with 25% K rate and 4% walk rate and 3 HR and 23 errors.  Or Concepcion having a 4.3 ERA with a 5K/4BB/9IP split). 

If Baez/Vogelbach/Soler/Concepcion are suddenly performing like top prospects in full-season, the perception would jump a bunch.  Maybe Simpson will be healthy and looking like a genuine prospect.  The perception could improve pretty quickly. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 16, 2012, 07:11:01 am
Of course, it's also true that Rizzo and Jackson won't benefit the perceptions of the farm system for long.  The only way they'll stay in the farm is if they are doing lousy.  So next winter's farm rankings will obviously not benefit from those two.  Even if, hopefully, the big-league team and the big-league future is benefitting greatly. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on February 16, 2012, 09:05:50 am
Quote
The Chicago Cubs are prepared to end their affiliation with the Boise Hawks after this season if the short-season Class A baseball team does not improve its stadium situation, Hawks officials said Wednesday.

“That’s not a threat. It’s just a fact,” said former major league all-star and longtime Boise resident Bill Buckner. He was hired by the Cubs to be the Hawks’ new hitting coach.

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/02/16/1996113/no-new-stadium-will-mean-no-cubs.html (http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/02/16/1996113/no-new-stadium-will-mean-no-cubs.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 16, 2012, 09:11:14 am
Yeah it seems like Boise could come up with a better ballpark than this.

http://www.charliesballparks.com/st/ID-Boise-Memorial.htm
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on February 16, 2012, 10:03:20 am
My son's high school field looks better than Boise's...

(http://colliervillehs.scsk12.org/~j1curtis/FIELD11.jpg)
(http://www.charliesballparks.com/st/ph/ID-Boise-Memorial-3.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 16, 2012, 10:37:20 am
The field looks OK, but they have to do something about those mountains.  They just aren't high enough.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 16, 2012, 10:46:23 am
ArizonaPhil mentioned something the other day that, if true, is very interesting.  Although the details have not yet come out, it seems that under the new labor agreement, teams will be able to trade, or trade for, unsued overseas signing money.  In other words, suppose that every team can spend 3 million dollars per year, and be penalized for going over that cap.  And suppose that Kansas City does not expect to spend it's overseas money.  They could trade it to the Cubs, and the Cubs could then spend 6 million dollars on overseas prospects without being penalized the next year.  Also, it seems that for the first time, supplimental draft choices can be traded.

One other thing that I would like to see verified.  He said that when an overseas prospect is signed, the money can be paid out over the length of the contract IF IT IS A MAJOR LEAGUE CONTRACT, but if it is a minor league contract, the money must be paid out immediately.  Thus, the 9 million or whatever that they will pay to Concepcion will be paid out over the next 4 years, but the 27 million for Soler would have to be paid in one lump sum.

I have seen none of the above verified, and I may have misunderstood some or all of it, but if it is accurate, that makes overseas signings much more complicated, and perhaps much more fun.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 16, 2012, 10:48:07 am
ArizonaPhil

Not much has been discussed (yet) about the new competitive balance lottery draft picks. These picks can supposedly can be traded, but the pick cannot be traded during the off-season.

Since which teams will get these picks cannot be determined until after the season, and if the picks cannot be traded during the off-season, the window for trading these picks therefore must be limited to about two months (MLB Opening Day up to the Rule 4 Draft the first week of June).

It also has not been made clear how and when International signing bonus cap money can be traded (and how much of it can be traded to any one team at any one time).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on February 16, 2012, 10:59:05 am
The mountains in Idaho or Memphis?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 16, 2012, 10:59:07 am
Theo/Jed/Jason will build much more depth and talent than the Cubs' system had in the early part of the last decade.  The overall plan/approach will be far more proactive and, before long, produce solid/balanced teams, which hasn't been the case in the past.   Our leaders think very differently, quite fortunately, than those from the past.  No one has a crystal ball, but i think our guys ARE going to get it done!  I'm not worried about that article or its premise one bit.   The past is the past.

The depth and talent in the system in 2002 was extremely high, and I would not bet on the Theocracy beating it, or at least not for a sustained period.  Hopefully the Theocracy will not get distracted from the importance of building and maintaining a strong farm system, something which I believe happened to Hendry initially because of his surprising initial success and the appearance that he could simply build on it in 2004 and 2005 , and which I believe then got worse when the Trib, and then Zell, decided not to invest in amateur procurement since they were selling the team shortly and such investment would not likely add to the team's sales value enough to justify the spending.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 16, 2012, 11:03:38 am
If Baez/Vogelbach/Soler/Concepcion are suddenly performing like top prospects in full-season, the perception would jump a bunch.  Maybe Simpson will be healthy and looking like a genuine prospect.  The perception could improve pretty quickly.

The one thing that you left out of your rosey scenario, and which I think is quite likely, is that LaHair does well the first three and a half months of the season and then gets moved for a couple of very serious prospects, who have considerable potential, but are at least a couple of years away from the majors.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on February 16, 2012, 12:03:42 pm
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/02/16/1996113/no-new-stadium-will-mean-no-cubs.html (http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/02/16/1996113/no-new-stadium-will-mean-no-cubs.html)

Doesn't look all that much different than the Daytona stadium
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on February 16, 2012, 12:41:06 pm
From the Boise Hawks web site.  The prices seem a little high to me for that level of minor league ball.

(http://www.milb.com/images/2009/07/21/Lt9d8N6c.jpg)

(http://www.milb.com/images/2011/01/24/CwFwAbqY.gif)




DIAMOND CLUBFor Info call 322-5000
3B/HP BOX SEATS$14 (Available for select packages)
1B BOX SEATSFri-Sat $12, Sun-Thur $10
3B/HP RESERVED SEATSFri-Sat $12, Sun-Thur $10
1B RESERVED SEATSFri-Sat $7, Sun-Thur $6
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 16, 2012, 12:57:59 pm
If LaHair does well, and Rizzo also is doing well, that would be a great time to trade LaHair. 

Also, given the many statements by Epstein of converting short term assets into long term assets, I think there is a good chance that they will trade Dempster this July, and Garza next winter if they can't sign him to a long term contract.

Also, I would think that Byrd's days are numbered, especially if he does well this spring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 16, 2012, 01:29:16 pm
dave, even if Rizzo is NOT doing well, the trade deadline would be a great time to trade LaHair.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 16, 2012, 02:00:15 pm
That is what I think.  I am not sure that that is what Epstein will think.  He still has to fill up the park.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 16, 2012, 02:01:54 pm
If LaHair hits well, I'm not sure why you'd rush to trade a guy making the major league minimum and putting up good offensive numbers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 16, 2012, 02:02:45 pm
Depends upon what you could get for him, and who his replacement is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 16, 2012, 02:03:57 pm
I don't think replacement would be much of an issue.  If/when Rizzo is ready, just move LaHair to LF if he's hitting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on February 16, 2012, 02:13:12 pm
If you can find a way to dump Soriano, that would probably be the best plan - for LaHair to move to LF if he shows that he can hit well enough to be an everyday player. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on February 16, 2012, 02:15:27 pm
Soriano is a sunk cost. Even if you can't move him, make LF a straight platoon, with LaHair getting most of the AB's...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 16, 2012, 02:25:17 pm
This is an awful lot of talk about a AAAA player...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 16, 2012, 02:35:02 pm
This is an awful lot of talk about a AAAA player...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 16, 2012, 02:38:57 pm
I don't know.  I imagine Theo and Hoyer spent a ton of time talking about him behind closed doors this offseason.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on February 16, 2012, 02:40:46 pm
From the Boise Hawks web site.  The prices seem a little high to me for that level of minor league ball.

(http://www.milb.com/images/2009/07/21/Lt9d8N6c.jpg)

(http://www.milb.com/images/2011/01/24/CwFwAbqY.gif)




DIAMOND CLUBFor Info call 322-5000
3B/HP BOX SEATS$14 (Available for select packages)
1B BOX SEATSFri-Sat $12, Sun-Thur $10
3B/HP RESERVED SEATSFri-Sat $12, Sun-Thur $10
1B RESERVED SEATSFri-Sat $7, Sun-Thur $6


Daytona has the 3 front rows down each line as "VIP"for $12. The rest of the stadium is general admission at $8.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 16, 2012, 02:43:59 pm
I don't think replacement would be much of an issue.  If/when Rizzo is ready, just move LaHair to LF if he's hitting.

That is certainly one option, the other two being trading him or letting him play as a backup for Rizzo.  The latter would make a lot of sense if you were concerned that Rizzo might not be ready, or just might not be very good.  But Epstein and Hoyer have often talked about getting younger and improving the defense.  I don't think that LaHair's age would enter much into the question, but I have never heard anyone that thought that LaHair is likely to be any better than average defensively in LF, at best.  If Epstein can trade him for someone that is good offensively and better defensively, he might well decide to trade him if he could get a good return for him.

Personally, I would just put him in left field and see how things worked out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 16, 2012, 05:50:07 pm
If LaHair hits well, I'm not sure why you'd rush to trade a guy making the major league minimum and putting up good offensive numbers.

Because LaHair is going to have more current value to a team in the race, particularly an overperforming team which has a tight budget.  However well LaHair hits in 2012, considering his age there is a very good chance it will be his career high water mark, and there is almost no question that his age will cause him to very rapidly have declining skills and performance.  The Cubs are still most likely at least two years away from contending.  Move him to a club which can use his current performance, and which will be happy to surrender good prospects for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 16, 2012, 05:51:09 pm
I don't think replacement would be much of an issue.  If/when Rizzo is ready, just move LaHair to LF if he's hitting.

The indications are that he doesn't even play the OF as GlennAllen Hill did.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 16, 2012, 05:59:56 pm
Soriano is a sunk cost. Even if you can't move him, make LF a straight platoon, with LaHair getting most of the AB's...

Using LaHair in a platoon would most likely reduce his trade value, and putting him in LF would not exactly be in keeping with the Theocracy's desire to improve defense, though it would be perfectly in line with the management philosophy of many years past when there was no attention to defense if someone could hit some HR.  Putting him in LF would also be giving up on trading him when his value is almost certain to be highest, even though the Cubs would almost certainly be weak enough during his peak years as not to come close to helping them reach the playoffs.

It would be the approach you would expect from the Cubs for several decades of foolishness.

Somewhat surprising to see so many here thinking that moving LaHair to LF would be the way to go, assuming he hits.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on February 16, 2012, 06:28:34 pm
Your opinion...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 16, 2012, 06:28:51 pm
Quote
The indications are that he doesn't even play the OF as GlennAllen Hill did.


Yes, but can LeHair do this?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3017957919029122909
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 16, 2012, 07:04:42 pm
I still remember that one. Most impressive home run I ever saw.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 16, 2012, 07:08:27 pm
I doubt that LaHair would be a GOOD LF, but I haven't heard anything to indicate that he would be particularly bad.  I doubt that he could be as bad as Soriano.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 16, 2012, 10:15:41 pm

Yes, but can LeHair do this?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3017957919029122909

No.  It's unfortunate that it was Dan Roan doing color for that game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 16, 2012, 10:21:43 pm
I thought it was more unfortunate that it was Chip doing PBP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 16, 2012, 10:31:44 pm
Dave, he played 14 games in the OF for the Cubs in 2011, and there is NO talk among the Theocracy that he play any more there.  He also has played a total of only 180 games there in 9 minor league seasons.

I am willing to take that as a clue.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 17, 2012, 08:02:56 am
I thought it was more unfortunate that it was Chip doing PBP.

Yep.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 17, 2012, 10:51:48 am
They have been talking about LaHair only at first base.  But I think the clue is that they want to eliminate talk of Rizzo breaking camp in April with the major league club.  An even bigger clue is that they did NOT give Rizzo an invitation to the big league camp.  They just don't want to rush him.

The question is, once they actually believe that Rizzo is ready, what do they do with LaHair?  As you say, he played 14 games in the outfield last year, and didn't embarrass himself or the team.  I think that if they feel that they have no better option, they will put him there.  But since they want to upgrade the defense, they will be actively be looking for what they believe is a better option.

If he does well this season, and they decide to shop him around, I suspect that they would be able to get some pretty good prospects for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on February 17, 2012, 10:58:31 am
Quote
I thought it was more unfortunate that it was Chip doing PBP.

Agree, but thanks for posting it, all the same!  Fun memory.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on February 17, 2012, 11:04:24 am
An even bigger clue is that they did NOT give Rizzo an invitation to the big league camp.

Yes, they did.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 17, 2012, 11:06:53 am
Really.  It was reported that they were not going to do that.  Maybe they think he is ready after all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 17, 2012, 11:08:22 am
Sorry.  Rizzo is on the 40 man roster.  That includes an invitation to the big league camp.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on February 17, 2012, 02:25:58 pm
2/17 Cubs Minor Leaguer suspended

Cubs Minor League pitcher Ricardo Estevez received a 50-game suspension after testing positive for taking two substances that are in violation of the Minor League drug prevention and treatment program. The Office of the Commissioner of Baseball announced the suspension on Friday. Estevez, a right-handed pitcher, tested positive for metabolites of Stanozolol and Nandrolone. A member of the Dominican Summer League Cubs, his suspension will be effective at the start of this season.

– Carrie Muskat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on February 17, 2012, 02:28:46 pm
Any Twitter user want to contact a Cubs minor leaguer?

http://topprospectalert.com/2012/01/13/chicago-cubs-minor-leaguers-on-twitter/ (http://topprospectalert.com/2012/01/13/chicago-cubs-minor-leaguers-on-twitter/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on February 17, 2012, 03:29:00 pm
Is Ricardo Estevez the missing Sheen brother?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on February 17, 2012, 03:30:14 pm
Dunston, Shoulders, and Vogelbach (Dopirak) are always tweeting (twitting?)...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 21, 2012, 10:37:04 am
Baseball America's top 100:

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/top-100-prospects/2012/2612998.html

Cubs:

32. Brett Jackson
47. Anthony Rizzo
61. Javier Baez
64. Matt Szczur

Obligatory Garza trade update: Lee is #44, and Archer is #89.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 21, 2012, 10:40:18 am
Surprised to see Ceasar that high.  Usually the guys in the top 100 are either extremely high draft choices or guys that have had substantial success in the minors.  Ceasar wasn't that high, and his minor league success has been decent, but not all that great.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 21, 2012, 10:43:21 am
Honestly, not to diss Matt Szczur that much, but I wonder if he's a little overrated.   Yeah he's got a great story, he's a really good athlete, and he got a surprisingly high signing bonus.  Still, he's a college guy who played most of last year in Low-A and didn't really play very well during his time in High-A.  He's not patient and doesn't hit for great power. 

Sometimes I wonder if his hype is due more to his signing bonus, unique background, and that Callis sometimes buys into Fleita gush than with him actually being a top notch prospect.
 
Hopefully he'll have a monster 2012 and put some of my concerns to rest, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on February 21, 2012, 10:44:51 am
He obviously has great tools, but performance wise, he is definitely overrated.  If his perfromance doesn't improve significantly this season, he won't be on any top 100 lists. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 21, 2012, 12:08:02 pm
Szczur has been playing both football and baseball. If he's half as exciting to watch in baseball as he was in college football, he'll be a star player. The 2012 baseball season will be his first as a full-time, baseball only player. I expect him to move up the Top 100 Prospect list next year, not down.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on February 21, 2012, 01:44:48 pm
HE IS a bit overrated...lots of potential no doubt, but until he starts getting a few more XBH's, he reminds me alot of Cangelosi or Pods
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 21, 2012, 02:50:52 pm
Szczur has been playing both football and baseball. If he's half as exciting to watch in baseball as he was in college football, he'll be a star player. The 2012 baseball season will be his first as a full-time, baseball only player. I expect him to move up the Top 100 Prospect list next year, not down.

He played football in 2011?

I thought 2011 was a season of "bull-time, baseball only play."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 21, 2012, 03:00:48 pm
He played in the fall/winter of 2012.  He did not play in the fall/winter of 2011.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on February 21, 2012, 03:23:26 pm
Are you Szczur about that?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on February 21, 2012, 03:25:22 pm
Glad to hear your perspective, Cubsin.   He does seem to be one athletically gifted dude!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 21, 2012, 05:28:13 pm
As JR says, I think Callis bought in on Szczur, and as a main guy at BA his opinion heavily impacts the BA ranking.  But I'm still pretty interested in seeing how he goes, and I still think he's got a very meaningful chance to be a very useful player.  Getting in BA's top 100 doesn't mean you're a sure thing, and certainly I'm surprised he's even remotely that high.  But I'm still pretty hopeful.  If he does emerge, BA can say they were ahead of the curve.  If he doesn't, not much shame in having some projection possibility in the 60's who gets pulled after a year. 

Quote
He obviously has great tools, but performance wise, he is definitely overrated.  If his perfromance doesn't improve significantly this season, he won't be on any top 100 lists.

True.  Year one, he's an inexperienced guy getting adjusted to pro ball and daily baseball for a full season, he's trying to figure out what he is as a pro, and he probably hit in some bad BABIP luck at Daytona.  The reasons/justifications are plausible.  Year two, if he doesn't get better those justifications won't apply and will now be no more than excuses.  His current ranking depends on **projected** improvement.  If he doesn't show significant progress, he's going to become yesterday's prospect pretty quick. 

He'll be a good one to watch at Daytona this year.  One year beyond D2, his first full-season year at age 21 need not be enough to define what he will become.  I'm really curious to see how his game develops, if at all, and in what direction.   

But if he does develop into a good player, in which direction(s) will that improvement show?
1.  Might his power develop nicely?  His reputation is as a no-power runner, but he hit 10 HR's and had 35 XBH at age 21.  If he projected as a 15-HR guy or better, with plenty of doubles power, that would be huge.   
2.  Might he emerge as a premium defender?    There were some reports of really good defense.  (Other reports lukewarm.) 
3.  Might he progress towards becoming a serious base-stealer?  Speed is always mentioned, yet he ended up with only 24 steals.   
4.  Might he emerge as a big-time hitter for average?  He hit .314 at Peoria, .293 overall, he suffered some bad BABIP luck at Daytona for a while, he K'd only 10% of his AB, and his K/HR ratio was >5:1.  If you K only 10-15% of the time while hitting 10-15 HR's, all while hitting a lot of line drives and getting some bunt and leg singles, hitting .300+ is very feasible. 
5.  Might Szczur walk more?  It's a new season and Theo has a new "Way".  Might Szczur realize that "grinding" is much valued, and that even if he K's quite a bit more that both his slugging and his OBP will benefit, and so too his approval rating among scouts and management and fans?  Is it possible that his walk rate will develop significantly and become quite acceptable for a potential asset leadoff guy? 

In a sense he kind of still has a chance to do it all.  A .300BA-.360OBP-14HR-.800OPS-35SB-strong-defense CFer would be super welcome at leadoff.  And it's still all possible. 

Still
Quote
He obviously has great tools
  that isn't clear.  Maybe he does.  But to me it's not clear that he has *any* great tools.  Power, base-stealing speed, defense, high average, high OBP, it's not obvious that he's really especially good at anything. 

This year will clarify a lot.  He could be off the map very quickly.  But he could do a lot to get us excited, too.  We're probably due for one of these stories to have a happy ending. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 21, 2012, 07:11:58 pm
He played in the fall/winter of 2012.  He did not play in the fall/winter of 2011.

While I could point out that the fall of 2012 hasn't really arrived yet, let me just rephrase my question to see if a simple "yes" or "no" will help me.

Did Szczur play football at any time in 2011?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 21, 2012, 09:39:01 pm
5.  Might Szczur walk more?  It's a new season and Theo has a new "Way".  Might Szczur realize that "grinding" is much valued, and that even if he K's quite a bit more that both his slugging and his OBP will benefit, and so too his approval rating among scouts and management and fans?  Is it possible that his walk rate will develop significantly and become quite acceptable for a potential asset leadoff guy? 

By all appearances he is a bright guy, who is receptive to coaching, and who has not so far been primarily a baseball player, which might make it less likely he has any deeply ingrained approach to the game making him somewhat resistant to change.  (All three of those would appear to be different from a Vitters.)  Good chance for him to grasp the grind it out approach, and the importance of OPB, and to be receptive to the change.  Since he only has 64 K's in 548 career minor league AB, he would also seem to have room to take a few more pitches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 21, 2012, 10:05:19 pm
While I could point out that the fall of 2012 hasn't really arrived yet, let me just rephrase my question to see if a simple "yes" or "no" will help me.

Did Szczur play football at any time in 2011?

Sorry, I mistyped.  He played football in the fall and winter of 2010, but not in the fall/winter of 2011.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 21, 2012, 10:12:55 pm
If so, it sounds to me as if 2011 was his first year as a full-time baseball player, and not that 2012 will be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 21, 2012, 10:17:44 pm
I believe what the poster meant was that this will be the first season that he did not play football in the off season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 21, 2012, 11:12:54 pm
I agree with both of you.  This will be Szczur's 2nd year as a full-time baseball player and his 2nd experience with full-season minor leaguers.  Sometimes guys sustain better their second time through when they know what it's like.  But it's also true that this will be the first off-season in which he used it and prepared with baseball in mind.  A winter ago, he was still playing college football into December, and doing football training for the combine into January.  Not sure how different if any the preparations are, but perhaps optimizing himself for football wasn't necesarily the best way to optimize physically for baseball.  And I think it had been an extended intense time.  Doing the marrow thing; spring baseball; getting drafted, negotiating, and signing; playing some minor league baseball; immediately jumping off to college, and going deep into the playoffs into December; immediately switching to combine prep; negotiating and signing with the Cubs; and within little more than a month getting going full-time on baseball.  I think at 21 a guy could have endless energy and focus, many do.  But I could also imagine that by July, after so many ups and downs over the previous year, the drudge of daily minor league baseball and the wear of it all mentally and physically might have worn him down a bit.  Hopefully he'll be really prepared and energized to play better and to steal more and to walk more and to sustain success all season long. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 22, 2012, 08:13:07 am
I agree with both of you.  This will be Szczur's 2nd year as a full-time baseball player and his 2nd experience with full-season minor leaguers.  Sometimes guys sustain better their second time through when they know what it's like.  But it's also true that this will be the first off-season in which he used it and prepared with baseball in mind.  A winter ago, he was still playing college football into December, and doing football training for the combine into January.  Not sure how different if any the preparations are, but perhaps optimizing himself for football wasn't necesarily the best way to optimize physically for baseball.  And I think it had been an extended intense time.  Doing the marrow thing; spring baseball; getting drafted, negotiating, and signing; playing some minor league baseball; immediately jumping off to college, and going deep into the playoffs into December; immediately switching to combine prep; negotiating and signing with the Cubs; and within little more than a month getting going full-time on baseball.  I think at 21 a guy could have endless energy and focus, many do.  But I could also imagine that by July, after so many ups and downs over the previous year, the drudge of daily minor league baseball and the wear of it all mentally and physically might have worn him down a bit.  Hopefully he'll be really prepared and energized to play better and to steal more and to walk more and to sustain success all season long. 

Does anyone else ever read Craig's posts at this time of year and think that if he had been part of the Charge of the Light Brigade, he would have thought he there was a good chance to capture the cannons?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 23, 2012, 04:45:05 pm
For those of you who love prospects, be on the lookout for Kevin Goldstein's podcast tomorrow on Baseball Prospectus.  It's going to be a 45 minute round table discussion with Goldstein, Keith Law, and Jim Callis.  Should be very interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 27, 2012, 09:16:58 am
Sounds like the Cubs let some pretty decent guys go in the Rule 5 . . .

Marwin Gonzalez - SS - Astros

Astros GM Jeff Luhnow believes that Rule 5 pick Marwin Gonzalez possesses the tools to become an everyday player.

''When you get a guy in the Rule 5, you don't automatically hand him the position,'' Luhnow said. ''Marwin's got the tools to be an everyday shortstop down the road. If you have to carry him on the roster, you don't want to overexpose him.'' Gonzalez, 22, is expected to compete for the utility job behind starter Jed Lowrie.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 27, 2012, 11:10:44 am
If Gonzalez had not been selected in the draft, and it was a Cubs coach that was saying that ''Marwin's got the tools to be an everyday shortstop down the road", there would be 25 posts here pointing out stats that prove that he could never be a regular.

But I agree, Gonzalez and Flaherty are both much better prospects than the Cubs have left vulnerable in previous drafts.  I would be happy to take either or both back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on February 28, 2012, 04:51:33 pm
(http://rotoauthority.blogs.com/.a/6a00d834515b9a69e20163021e6209970d-600wi)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on February 28, 2012, 04:53:51 pm
The above chart is from

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/02/service-time-considerations-for-top-prospects.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 28, 2012, 05:07:25 pm
Unless I missed a major trade, Devin Mesoraco is a Red, not a Padre.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 29, 2012, 10:57:44 am
Rizzo talking about himself and LaHair.

"He and I both talked about it. If somehow we could both be in the same lineup, it could be pretty scary."

He didn't say whether it would be scary for the other team, or for the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 29, 2012, 11:28:04 am
Rizzo talking about himself and LaHair.

"He and I both talked about it. If somehow we could both be in the same lineup, it could be pretty scary."

I like how he's thinking.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 29, 2012, 01:06:23 pm
Sveum has been very adamant in support/promoting/stabilizing LaHair's status as "the" 1B.  He's the guy, flat.  He's not competing for a job, it's is job.  It's not his job to lose, its his job.  I imagine Sveum wants guys to be comfortable  and feel safe.  That could annoy fans after a while, though, if it's a bad player or a veteran player.  I wonder if it might be selective?  A guy with one personality, maybe you don't want him worrying and wondering, you want to do anything you can to help him relax.  A different personality, maybe you need to be providing him to get him to hustle or push himself, relaxing is the last thing you want?  In LaHair's case, it might also just be a case of Sveumm trying to protect himself as well, he doesn't want daily questions about it or daily media stories about it. 

I wonder how feasible it might actually be for either Rizzo or LaHair to play LF?  Could Rizzo play an OK LF, I wonder?  If you did play them both, which would move to OF? 

As committed as Sveum might be to LaHair at 1B, I don't imagine Hoyer was trading Cashner in order to get Rizzo for LF.   I'm sure they are hopeful that LaHair does well, but I don't imagine they traded for Rizzo with the expectation in mind that LaHair would play 1B for the next five years. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 29, 2012, 01:29:36 pm
In the early 1960's the Giants had a pair of power-hitting young firstbasemen, both ultimately ending up in the HOF.

And they tried to play both of them at the same time, one as a firstbaseman, and the other in LF.

And it just did not work very well.  They made it to the WS once, but probably would have made it more than that if they would have moved one of them for another position of need.... but they did help those teams score a boatload of runs.  In 1963 McCovey, with an OPS+ of 161 and a raw OPS of .915 was the weakest of the trio of Cepeda, Mays and McCovey in that lineup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 29, 2012, 01:32:58 pm
Anthony Rizzo has never played left field as far as I can tell.

Bryan LaHair has played a little bit of outfield and, like many have pointed out, he couldn't possibly be much worse than Alfonso Soriano out there defensively.

I think Rizzo will be the guy by June 1st.

I really hope LaHair hits enough to be useful but I doubt it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 29, 2012, 01:37:39 pm
Sveum may be talking up LaHair sticking at 1B and 1B only, but I still imagine if he shows he can hit and hit substantially better than Soriano, he would be the one moving to LF if anyone moves there.

By the way, with some of the questions about LaHair's LF defense, it's obviously tough to make any real judgments without seeing him regularly.  Still between 2009-10 he actually played more LF than 1B.  Over the last three seasons, his 1.81 range factor in LF is in line with the major league average of 1.86, and his .991 fielding percentage in LF is better than the major league average of .986.

Just based on stats and as much LF as he's played the last three years in the minors, he appears to be someone who can be at least average in LF and possibly slightly above.  That's probably what will happen during the second half of the season if he's a clear offensive upgrade over Soriano and if Rizzo is ready.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 29, 2012, 03:39:24 pm
I think Sveum is being blunt about LaHair at first in order to keep down controversy about Rizzo breaking camp with the regulars in April.  Every decision is subject to change, but it seems quite clear, and I expect it has been made clear to Sveum, that Epstein/Hoyer/McLoed want rizzo to start the year in the minors for whatever reason.

How long he stays there is another question.  If he does poorly at Iowa, he is likely to stay there for much of the season.  If, on the other hand, he tears up the league, and the scouts say he is ready, it will be difficult to keep him there.

When Rizzo comes up, the next question is, what do you do with LaHair?  If he has been doing poorly for that period of time, the decision is simple.  The bench, minors or trade/release.  But if he has been doing well during that time, the next question becomes;

What do you do with Soriano?  Even if he has been playing badly, it would be a major decision to bench a player making the money he is making.  And if he is doing decently, then we are back to LaHair. 

I don't believe that many baseball people believe that LaHair can NOT play an acceptable left field, (the place where the Hank Sauers and Ralph Kiners go to hide).  I think that in the above situation, the Cubs would make a massive effort to move Soriano, eating as much salary as possible.  I think that is much more likely than their trading a successful LaHair at that point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 29, 2012, 03:57:02 pm
That's probably what will happen during the second half of the season if he's a clear offensive upgrade over Soriano and if Rizzo is ready.

If LaHair is doing well by the trade deadline, the Cubs will at least aggressively look to trade him.  Whether they do depends on what they are offered, but he will be 29 this year, and will start his normal age-related decline very quickly.  LaHair's value would almost certainly be greater to other teams than it will be with the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 29, 2012, 04:23:17 pm
There's no way you move Rizzo - the better player and better 1B defender - off 1B for LaHair.  In the unlikely event LaHair hits enough for this to be a problem, he'd be the one to move to LF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 29, 2012, 04:58:37 pm
Have we heard that Rizzo is a better defender at first base than LaHair?  I haven't heard that that is necessarily the case.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on February 29, 2012, 05:40:32 pm
Heard Jed on MLB Network Radio interviewed by Jim Bowden...Hoyer really sounds bright and thoughtful.   Said all the right stuff re Garza ("wants to stay in Chicago" "the kind of pitcher we want") and re what they will look for this season beyond Ws/Ls ("development of young players" and how/whether some like Volstad, Wood, even Maholm will "bounce back" because good, relatively young starting pitchers who are "controllable" are hard to find).

When asked whether the PTBNL exchange on the Theo deal will favor Boston, he said "yes."   Later in the interview, he said the PTBNL exchange "will slightly favor Boston." 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on February 29, 2012, 05:53:57 pm
That almost sounds like it's been determined.  If so, the only reason for it to be a ptbnl is that it's someone who cannot yet be legally traded.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 29, 2012, 06:24:26 pm
That almost sounds like it's been determined.  If so, the only reason for it to be a ptbnl is that it's someone who cannot yet be legally traded.

Or because the Red Sox will pick from a short list and want to see how folks do in spring training.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 01, 2012, 11:39:13 am
Beliveau Looks To Win Job In Cubs' Bullepn

By Phil Rogers
March 1, 2012

E-mail Print



MESA, ARIZ.—Sean Marshall is gone, and the Cubs didn't go outside the organization to replace him after a trade that sent him to the Reds. That has created competition for his spot in the bullpen.

"The new regime, they seem like they mean business," 25-year-old lefthander Jeff Beliveau said. "They're trying to win, and I think they're going to put guys who perform on the field, which is the way it's supposed to be. I'm pretty excited."

The Cubs hope that Beliveau, Scott Maine or John Gaub will emerge as a significant lefthanded contributor in new manager Dale Sveum's bullpen. To do that, they must show that they can get five or six outs at a time, which was Marshall's calling card.

Beliveau is the youngest guy in this mix. He's also riding momentum entering camp after a 2011 season that ended with him pitching well for Team USA in the World Cup and Pan American Games last fall.

Beliveau, an 18th-round draft pick from Florida Atlantic in 2008, attacks the strike zone with a fastball that peaks in the low 90s. He has natural deception from his movement and complements the fastball with a solid change and get-me-over curveball.

The 6-foot-1, 190-pound Believeau went 1-0, 1.42 in his five outings with Team USA, striking out nine and walking one in six innings. That followed a 2011 season when he went 6-2, 1.57 in 74 innings for high Class A Daytona and Double-A Tennessee, earning him the team's minor league pitcher of the year award. He led Southern League relievers in WHIP (0.81) and opponent average (.183).

In the process, Beliveau went from being a relative unknown in the organization to a guy whose reliability could make him a long-term asset for Theo Epstein's construction project. The job this spring is to hang onto the Cubs uniform he was assigned at the start of spring training.

"It's definitely realistic," Beliveau said about winning a job. "It's not out of the cards, but it's going to take some hard work."

Cubbyhole

• After months of slow-moving talks, the Cubs agreed to send righthander Chris Carpenter to the Red Sox as compensation for Epstein. The deal also includes two moving parts, with the teams swapping players to be named later that will be identified after spring training.

• Welington Castillo and the lefthanded-hitting Steve Clevenger will compete for the Cubs' backup catcher job, and their development could influence the decision on signing starter Geovany Soto to a contract extension or trading him. He's two years away from free agency.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 01, 2012, 04:10:03 pm
Quote
Beliveau, ...attacks the strike zone with a fastball that peaks in the low 90s. He has natural deception from his movement and complements the fastball with a solid change and get-me-over curveball.


Beliveau is an interesting guy.  Russell seems to be the assumed veteran lefty reliever, but the Maine/Gaub/Beliveau battle seems quite interesting to me.  Relievers come and go and are hard to predict.  But winning teams usually have a cast of effective relievers.  And effective relievers are one of the more tradable assets in the game.  (Their contracts are rarely prohibitive, it doesn't break a GM's heart to trade a reliever away, and no teams ever have enough, so their is always broad market.) 


It will be very interesting if one or more of the Maine/Gaube/Beli group emerges as solid, and also whether Russell does as well.  Good chance that none of them do, of course.  But if you can assemble some effective young relievers, then if you click on a starter or two, suddenly your staff can get pretty good pretty quickly. 


Certainly my present favorite, and puzzle, from that group is Beliveau.  Scouting reports never seem to buzz either his velocity or his breaking ball.  But he's had killer K-rates anyway.  Perhaps the scouting reports don't do justice, or else his "deceptive delivery" makes an 88-92 fastball an exceptionally deadly pitch. 




Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 03, 2012, 08:48:39 am
The Cubs signed left-hander Nate Robertson to a minor league deal, Eddy (Matt Eddy - Baseball america) writes.  Robertson had a 7.14 ERA with 5.3 K/9 and 3.7 BB/9 in 18 starts with the Mariners' Triple-A affiliate last season.


Roster fill.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 03, 2012, 08:53:48 am
Roster fill?  Davep would be better roster fill.  At least with Davep you could teach pitchers how to throw high and tight without worrying about hurting the stiff in the box.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 03, 2012, 10:48:13 am
In 44 years, Mrs DaveP has never managed to hit me with a thrown dish.  Pitchers wouldn't have a chance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on March 03, 2012, 11:07:43 am
How has she done with knives?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 03, 2012, 12:52:34 pm
The Cubs signed left-hander Nate Robertson to a minor league deal, Eddy (Matt Eddy - Baseball america) writes.  Robertson had a 7.14 ERA with 5.3 K/9 and 3.7 BB/9 in 18 starts with the Mariners' Triple-A affiliate last season.


Roster fill.

More like roster-clog.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 03, 2012, 01:03:11 pm
How has she done with knives?

I don't allow knives in the house since the "honeymoon incident"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on March 03, 2012, 01:08:05 pm
Robertson is a horrible pitcher.  He has only once had an era under 4.48 in his career and his numbers in triple-a last year were just abysmal.  There's nothing wrong with buying a lottery ticket, but there's no point in buying the ticket if they had the drawing night before.  Considering this year is about installing a framework to build a consistent winner and focusing on the future, I see no point in this signing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 03, 2012, 03:24:03 pm
I put that as one of the options, although for public relations purposes, I doubt that they would just bench him.

Time will tell.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 03, 2012, 03:46:04 pm
I think for PR purposes benching Soriano would be the best thing the Cubs could do.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 03, 2012, 03:56:14 pm
I put that as one of the options, although for public relations purposes, I doubt that they would just bench him.

Time will tell.

While Sveum is supposed to be a serious, tough, no-nonsense straightforward guy, he seems very much a positive and pro-player, player-defending guy.  He's seemed to be Fleita-like in his positive, favorable comments about absolutely every player thus far.  Theo also repeatedly talked about "having each other's backs".   He also seems to be very concerned about protecting player equilibrium and not having them worried about things. 

So I don't expect a lot of player-criticism coming from Sveum.  I expect that for guys who are giving good effort and listening to coaching, that Sveum is likely to be very patient, and avoid having them worried about their jobs.  He may well be another Quade in terms of defending player effort and sticking with veterans, assuming that the veterans are playing "the right way". 

My guess is that Soriano is going to get a very long leash.  (And LaHair, and Dempster...)  I don't think he's going to want to make anybody look bad, or to have them worrying about job security, or rattle their comfort level too much if he thinks the effort is there.

That said, Sveum talks as if he doesn't worry about perceptions or PF.  And I don't think either Sveum or the new regime really should be too occupied with PR. 

Obviously PR and player psyche are interconnected.  A lineup change is going to both stimulate PR discussion and player uncertainty.  My guess is that Sveum may be somewhat slow to make changes until/unless he's pretty certain they are necessary.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 03, 2012, 05:15:35 pm
When I said PR, I probably should have said "fan attraction".

Nothing fills the seats in Wrigley Field than home runs, and the Cubs are woefully short on sluggers this year, unless both Lahair AND Stewart do very well.  And the odds are strongly against BOTH of them doing that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 03, 2012, 05:31:55 pm
I doubt fans are buying tickets to watch Soriano at this point.  Especially is he's playing badly enough to entice Sveum to bench him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 03, 2012, 06:00:27 pm
I doubt fans are buying tickets to watch Soriano at this point.  Especially is he's playing badly enough to entice Sveum to bench him. 

They sure weren't buying them to watch the dogie do on the field last season, I'll tell you.  I was sitting in an area in September near season ticket holders.  They were pissed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on March 03, 2012, 06:35:21 pm
When I said PR, I probably should have said "fan attraction".

Nothing fills the seats in Wrigley Field than home runs, and the Cubs are woefully short on sluggers this year, unless both Lahair AND Stewart do very well.  And the odds are strongly against BOTH of them doing that.

In your opinion, of the two, which do you think is more likely to have the better year?  Started to ask who you would say had the higher ceiling, but I'm guessing the answer to that is Stewart.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 03, 2012, 06:54:27 pm
I think that LaHair will have the better year.  And I think LaHair has the higher ceiling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 03, 2012, 06:55:02 pm
Agree on both counts...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 11, 2012, 01:44:49 pm

Paul Sullivan:
Cuban lefty Concepcion gets guaranteed $6 million, five-year deal. Will be sent to minor league camp.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on March 11, 2012, 02:09:41 pm
I like a plan.  Rather than having no conception.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on March 11, 2012, 05:14:06 pm
Fangraphs has ranked the farm systems, and the Cubs are #22.  Here's their write-up:

Quote
22. Chicago Cubs
Top 2011 Draft Pick: Javier Baez, SS
Top 2012 Prospect: Javier Baez, SS
Org Strengths: Right-handed pitching depth
Org Weaknesses: Catching, Left-handed pitching
Top Scout(s): Jose Serra, responsible for Welington Castillo, Rafael Dolis, Junior Lake, Marco Hernandez, Jeimer Candelario, and Jose Rosario; special mention: Lukas McKnight for Dan Vogelbach, Chris Carpenter (now with Boston), and Zeke DeVoss.

I don't know that I'd call right-handed pitching depth a strength.  And catching is far from a weakness.  Castillo is a definite everyday prospect, and Clevenger should be at least a back-up.  Given how hard it is to find legit catching prospects, are there more than 5 or 6 organizations that are better off than the Cubs there?  Kind of makes their ratings a little suspect when 2 of the 3 strengths/weaknesses are wrong.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ranking-the-30-minor-league-systems/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on March 11, 2012, 06:23:56 pm
Fangraphs has ranked the farm systems, and the Cubs are #22.  Here's their write-up:

I don't know that I'd call right-handed pitching depth a strength.  And catching is far from a weakness.  Castillo is a definite everyday prospect, and Clevenger should be at least a back-up.  Given how hard it is to find legit catching prospects, are there more than 5 or 6 organizations that are better off than the Cubs there?  Kind of makes their ratings a little suspect when 2 of the 3 strengths/weaknesses are wrong.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ranking-the-30-minor-league-systems/

I agree...when i read the strengths and weaknesses, it made the little spot over my nose curl in confusion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 11, 2012, 06:28:03 pm
There are really no strengths whatsoever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on March 11, 2012, 06:51:08 pm
Cleavenger and Castillo are organization filler, guys who Cub fans overvaluing their own talent view as prospects.  Both project as backups, and there are no impact prospects in the system - that's why catcher is a system weakness.

#22 is probably about right.  I like Jackson and Rizzo, but it says something when you have to reach for guys to fill out your top 5 based entirely on their pre-draft résumé.  This isn't a deep system, and it lacks star-potential players.  Theo knew the depth of the problem going in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on March 11, 2012, 06:52:49 pm
I have liked what I've seen of Clevenger so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on March 11, 2012, 06:56:40 pm
There are really no strengths whatsoever.

I think there are some positions of strength....1b are cf are a couple.  Maybe 3b if Baez joins Candelario(who I really like) there in the next year or so, but they'll probably keep him at ss till at least AA, and probably AAA.  I know most of you have written off Vitters, but he still has a chance to be a plus bat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 11, 2012, 07:46:16 pm
The newest signee.....

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1049955-chicago-cubs-why-gerardo-concepcion-is-perfect-rebuild-signing

Chicago Cubs: Why Gerardo Concepcion is Perfect Rebuild Signing   
By Tommy Stokke (Featured Columnist) on February 2, 2012

With most of the dust settling on the free-agent market, few impact players remain for the taking.

Most of the talk surrounds Roy Oswalt and Cuban outfielders Yoenis Cespedes and Jorge Soler.

But the Cuban that Theo Epstein should have his eye on towards rebuilding the future is 18-year-old pitcher Gerardo Concepcion. Concepcion is officially a free agent after receiving residency in Mexico.

Cespedes makes an immediate impact and Soler is too big of a risk. Concepcion is the perfect mix of potential and affordable that will vastly improve the rebuilding foundation Epstein is putting in place.

After I said Soler isn't worth chasing, one may wonder what makes Concepcion different. While both are young Cuban players, they are very different situations.

First of all, Concepcion is a starting pitcher, left-handed at that. When the time comes that I have my first son (hopefully not anytime soon) you better believe I'm putting everything in his left hand and hoping he is blessed with a cannon. Quality left-handed pitchers don't come around often, which explains why many teams are willing to invest time and money into them.

So big deal, he's left-handed. So are Doug Davis, Tom Gorzelanny and Sean Marshall. While each was serviceable in his own way, none of them are or were front-end starters. Maybe Concepcion isn't the next ace of the staff, but it's worth the risk to find out.

Contract demands aren't specific, but he may be looking at a deal similar to that of Kansas City Royal's prospect Noel Arguellas who signed a five-year deal for $7 million.

Besides position, this is the biggest difference between Soler and Concepcion. Concepcion is looking for just over $1 million a year, while Soler wants more in the range of $5 million a year. It doesn't sound like much to one of the higher-spending markets in baseball, but that $4 million dollar difference can be spent each year for fill-in players or bullpen help.

What else is there to Concepcion? He is a lanky 6'1" and 175 pounds. At his young, ripe age he figures to have room to grow into his frame and add more velocity to his already 91-94 mph fastball. He also features an above-average curveball to go along with a change-up and slider.

Concepcion earned the 2011 Cuban National Series Rookie of the Year competing against older players, many in their prime. Despite whatever level the Cuban National Series is compared to, any award is an accomplishment at 18 years old.

He finished with a 10-3 mark to go along with a solid 3.36 ERA. In just over 100 innings, he gave up just 6 home runs while averaging 4.9 K/9 rate. While not thoroughly impressive, it's a number that is expected to continue to rise as he grows into his body.

Because he isn't widely known, he will be able to grow under-the-radar in the minors without the pressures of being rushed to the Majors like previous prospects may have been. He'll also benefit from playing for newly hired Double-A pitching coach Jeff Fassero, who had an extensive career as a left-handed pitcher himself.

Ben Badler of Baseball America provides a brief scouting report that says part of Concepcion's negative side is his mechanics. Concepcion delivers the ball across his body, which some think is deceiving to hitters, while others believe it worsens his curveball.

Either way, mechanics are something that can be fixed at 18 years old in the minor leagues.

Whether he is the next Ardolis Chapman or just a bust is up in the air. But he sure is worth the price to find out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 11, 2012, 09:12:35 pm
http://www.scoutingbook.com/players/p2921


The Book on Gerardo Concepcion

Prospect Info and Scouting Report

Gerardo Concepcion / LHP, CHC
Born 6/6/1993 (18 years old)
Havana, Cuba

Height 6-2
Weight 180
Bats/Throws L/L

ScoutingBook Combine Ranking (3/11/2012): #209 
MiLB.com Season Preview: Unranked or n/a
Scout.com/FOX Sports: Unranked or n/a
ESPN: Unranked or n/a
The Sporting News: Unranked or n/a
Baseball America 2012: Unranked or n/a
Baseball Prospectus: Unranked or n/a


Cuban lefthander Gerardo Concepcion is a young phenom who's been quiet all winter, while arranging his citizenship in Mexico, working out in the Dominican Republic and generally getting ready for his new life in America. That life will have a North Side address, now, as the new Cubs brain trust scooped him up when nobody else was looking.

No fifth starter, Concepcion was the Rookie of the Year in the Cuban National League last season with the Industriales. In his first and final year in Cuba, Concepcion posted a 3.36 ERA in sixteen starts and five relief appearances. He defected in Rotterdam this winter.

Comparisons to Aroldis Chapman are inevitable, though Noel Arguelles might be a better choice. In Concepcion's case, either comparison is almost fair. Concepcion can't come close to Chapman's heat, and he's even less polished, but he does bring similarly wicked stuff from a similarly tall, wiry frame. Using a deceptive sweeping delivery that makes him look a little like a slinger, Concepcion's arm action restricts his fastball to a maximum of about 92-94mph right now and probably impairs his command somewhat, but he's still got room to grow, and it's quite possible the Cubs will break his mechanics down and rebuild them in a different way, too.

His change and curve are seen as potential plus pitches, but also look inconsistent. The slider is already great, though it rings off as much dirt as leather. Overall, it seems near-certain he'd be devastating if he could harness his breaking balls just a little more reliably.

It's possible Concepcion will see some action in Chicago as early as this season, if only for a look-see from the bullpen, but it probably won't be real action. Yes, the Cubs may want to see what they're dealing with after spending so much money, but they'd also far rather develop the youngster into a solid starter. That will take a couple of years.

[ Bio Updated Spring, 2012 ]


Pitching Stats
Yr   Age   Lv   Lg   Tm      W   L   GA   GS   IP   H   ER   BB   K   HB   WP   WHIP   K/9   BB/9   K/BB
2011   18      Cuba   Havana Ind.      10   3   21   16   102   103   38   43   53   0   0   1.431    4.7    3.8   1.23

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 11, 2012, 09:15:54 pm
http://www.csnchicago.com/blog/cubs-talk/post/BaseballProspectus-Kevin-Goldstein-on-Co?blockID=647086

BaseballProspectus' Kevin Goldstein on Concepcion

February 7, 2012, 7:41 pm
The Cubs signed 18-year-old Cuban lefty Gerardo Concepcion to a $7 million deal late last week.

Kevin Goldstein of BaseballProspectus was on CSN's Chicago Baseball Hot Stove Tuesday to talk more about the young pitcher.

We've heard a bit on what Goldstein thinks of the deal already, but what he said towards the end is most surprising: He hasn't heard of anybody who had a bid for Concepcion more than $2.5 million. If that's true, the Cubs overpaid. Big time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on March 11, 2012, 09:37:05 pm
According to the Tribune, Concepcion is actually 20 years old. 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0312-cubs-bits--20120312,0,2386784.story
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 11, 2012, 09:58:45 pm
It was reported that he turned 20 last month.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 11, 2012, 10:32:44 pm
http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/03/09/cubs-minor-league-camp-rosters (http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/03/09/cubs-minor-league-camp-rosters)

Arizona Phil, on the camp Minor League rosters.  "LIMITED ACTIVITY ONLY" pretty much always means guys who are injured and involved in some kind of rehab, and has some bad news.   

Dillon Maples, the multi-million-dollar signing who is consistently ranked among our very top prospects, is the headliner.  Not a good start. 

Top ten picks power prospects Gretzky and Schlect are also included, as well as Easterling, Ethan Elias (the small-town western Canadian pitching prospect who I'd been secretly optimistic about), and Urban.  Interesting that so many of our overslot/superslot guys are already hurt. 

Whitenack, no no surprise, is also listed.  Although given Fleita's spin at the convention, I'd secretly hoped that Fleita really was honestly telling us that Whitenack was already as good as new.  Figured that was too good to be true. 

Hopefully for many of these guys the injuries are not enduring and don't impact their long-term careers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on March 11, 2012, 10:53:09 pm
There's NO way to know now whether Cubs overpaid for Concepcion...we will know in about 5 years (and what Keith Law or whoever opines now won't matter one iota).

I'd sure rather see us invest in him than in another Grabow or Kevin Gregg or even Oswalt, who could easily be worth it IF healthy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 12, 2012, 08:27:51 am
ben, while I was simply posting the most informative pieces I found, I was not suggesting that I agreed, or disagreed with any of it.  That said, however, whether you overpay or underpay for something is not determined years, or decades after the fact, looking back in hindsight.  It is determined by needs, available resources (cash or players at the same position), scouting evaluation and competing offers.

In other words it is determined by supply and demand.

If no other team offered more than half as much as the Cubs did for the same length of time, then the Cubs overpaid for him, even if the kids ends up being a HOFer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 12, 2012, 10:02:38 am
Prices are determined by the intersection of the supply and the demand.  There is no such thing as overpaying.  The Cubs were willing to pay 7 million, the player was willing to sign for 7 million, 7 million was the legitimate price.  What others were willing to pay is irrelevant.

The value of a player to a team is specific.  If the Braves have a desperate need for a shortstop, a shortstop is more valuable to them than the same shortstop would be to a team that already has a satisfactory shortstop.

And when bidding is done by secret offers, the value of a unique item is set by what the highest bidder is willing to pay, not what the second highest bidder is willing to pay.

That is why the agents require secret bidding rather than open bidding.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 12, 2012, 10:31:14 am
....And when bidding is done by secret offers, the value of a unique item is set by what the highest bidder is willing to pay, not what the second highest bidder is willing to pay...

In practice, it seems fair to say that it's overpaying to spend a lot more than you needed to buy something.  The player/agent will accept the highest offer.  So if we spent $6 on Concepcion and spend $27 on Soler, when $4 and $20 would have been enough, I think it's fair to refer to that as "overpay". 

But with secret bidding, you don't know how much is needed.  It's a guessing game.  The Cubs made very, very lavish offers for both Darvish and Cespedes, both bids that they thought might win.  But oops, in both cases they were outbid. 

If you like the prospects and they turn out to be good major-leaguers, I don't think anybody is going to regret having spent an extra $2-3 on Concepcion or $7 more than was needed on Soler. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on March 12, 2012, 11:05:16 am
I wonder why the bidding on Concepcion was so low.  All the talk was that he wasn't more than a back end starter, but was extremely polished for his age and a good bet to reach his ceiling.  A back end starter on the free agent market is going to cost a lot more than Concepcion will ever cost the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on March 12, 2012, 01:31:15 pm
I'm really hoping Baez can play 2nd base for many years. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 12, 2012, 01:36:53 pm
I wonder why the bidding on Concepcion was so low.  All the talk was that he wasn't more than a back end starter, but was extremely polished for his age and a good bet to reach his ceiling.  A back end starter on the free agent market is going to cost a lot more than Concepcion will ever cost the Cubs.

Certainly SOME of the talk was that he was nothing more than a back end starter.  But SOME of the talk was that he was much better than that.  It seems that the Cubs believe that he has a higher potential than some seem to think.  And there was no way that they could have known if one or more teams thought the same thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on March 12, 2012, 02:23:10 pm
$6 million isn't overpaying with a low-end starter with a perceived low bust percentage.  I don't think the contract implies that the Cubs view him as any more than that - merely that they think $6 million is fair for a low-end starter who's pretty likely to make it to the big leagues, especially with the rule changes coming into play that will make it impossible to dominate the international market just by spending more money.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on March 12, 2012, 03:36:45 pm
We're paying Paul Maholm $6.25 million for one year of service, and a similar amount next year. If Concepcion performs as well as other teams expect, he's a bargain. If he performs as well as the Cubs expect, he's a steal. If he blows out his arm before he ever reaches the big leagues, it was still a good signing in light of the new bonus limits for prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 12, 2012, 03:58:47 pm
Prices are determined by the intersection of the supply and the demand.  There is no such thing as overpaying.  The Cubs were willing to pay 7 million, the player was willing to sign for 7 million, 7 million was the legitimate price.  What others were willing to pay is irrelevant.


I was going to respond, but there is really nothing to add beyond what craig points out below.

In practice, it seems fair to say that it's overpaying to spend a lot more than you needed to buy something.  The player/agent will accept the highest offer.  So if we spent $6 on Concepcion and spend $27 on Soler, when $4 and $20 would have been enough, I think it's fair to refer to that as "overpay".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 12, 2012, 04:38:16 pm
You only spent more than you had to if

1. it is true that no none was willing to pay more than what was reported, and

2. lacking that information, you were willing to lose what you consider to be a 7 million dollar player to someone that offered a little more than you thought they would.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 12, 2012, 04:47:01 pm
Meanwhile, Lendy Castillo has just K'd 2 guys in his perfect inning.  Samardz gave up a couple of quick runs, then finished off his 2nd and 3rd innings well. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 13, 2012, 10:31:30 am
ArizonaPhil

 (BTW, I suspect Burke might very well be on the list of players the Padres get to choose from as compensation for the Cubs signing Hoyer/McLeod).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on March 13, 2012, 07:42:18 pm
I found this tidbit from Keith Law at ESPN.

Chicago Cubs

"I was never a big Reggie Golden fan out of the draft. I saw an athletic kid with poor pitch recognition who could get tied up inside, but he has made adjustments faster than I anticipated, recognizing breaking balls better and playing stronger defense in right field. His main issue going forward will be conditioning, as he has a maintenance body with a low center of gravity, but I'm coming around on his chance to have some impact with the bat. Also keep an eye on center fielder Taiwan Easterling if you like extreme sleepers. He's a two-sport guy who had more at-bats after signing last June than he did the previous two seasons at Florida State combined."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 13, 2012, 07:47:39 pm
Keith Law is a dope.

And not just an ordinary dope.

A world-class dope.

Reggie Golden?  Get serious.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on March 13, 2012, 08:37:05 pm
It was in a section on sleeper prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 16, 2012, 01:22:15 pm
From Baseball America . . .
 
ESTIMATED 2011 INTERNATIONAL AMATEUR SIGNING BUDGETS   Player  Bonuses   1. Rangers  $12.83 million   2. Blue Jays  $7.57 million   3. Royals  $6.80 million   4. Mariners  $6.67 million   5. Cubs  $4.54 million   6. Pirates  $4.09 million   7. Indians  $3.58 million   8. Padres  $3.48 million   9. Red Sox  $3.25 million   10. Tigers  $3.03 million   11. Yankees  $2.93 million   12. Mets  $2.86 million   13. Cardinals  $2.63 million   14. Braves  $2.49 million   15. Twins  $2.31 million   16. Astros  $2.12 million   17. Phillies  $2.05 million   18. Reds  $1.98 million   19. Giants  $1.81 million   20. Rays  $1.79 million   21. Brewers  $1.63 million   22. Rockies  $1.45 million   23. Marlins  $1.38 million   24. Angels  $1.35 million   25. Athletics  $1.22 million   26. Nationals  $1.12 million   27. Orioles  $1.02 million   28. Diamondbacks  $876,000   29. White Sox  $778,500   30. Dodgers  $177,000
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 16, 2012, 01:24:32 pm
International Bonuses Rise In 2011

By Ben Badler
March 15, 2012

 
E-mail Print

It's never easy to judge the quality of an international signing class when most of the top players who signed last year have yet to make their professional debuts.

However, at least one thing is clear: spending increased.

Excluding Cuban defectors and Japanese professionals, teams spent approximately $76 million on international amateur bonuses in 2010. That figure, according to Baseball America's estimates, jumped to $89 million in 2011, an increase of 12 percent. Most of that money goes to players in the Dominican Republic and Venezuela, where teams spent a combined $79 million.

"This year was good," said an international director with a National League club. "It was one of the deeper July 2s that we have had. Did we overpay a lot? I think it was a good year, we just paid too much money for some players the last couple of years. Every year we pay more money, but this year will be different because of the new CBA."

Though Venezuela has nearly three times the population of the Dominican Republic, teams every year spend more money on Dominican prospects. Estimated spending on Dominican players increased 14 percent from $44 million in 2010 to $50 million in 2011, with 94 Dominican players signing for $100,000 or more, an increase from 92 in 2010.

The big increase in spending, however, came in Venezuela. After teams spent approximately $20 million on Venezuelan amateurs in 2010, they poured $29 million into the market in 2011, a 45 percent increase. After 33 Venezuelan players signed for six-figure bonuses in 2010, there were 55 Venezuelan players who did so in 2011. Yet despite the aggressive spending, some teams have cut resources in Venezuela. The Reds and Pirates have both pulled out of their Venezuelan academies and the Venezuelan Summer League, which means the 2012 VSL will feature just four teams: the Mariners, Phillies, Rays and Tigers.

"I'd say overall, I'd rank out the Dominican Republic ahead (of Venezuela)," said an American League international scouting director. "They were probably equal in terms of top heaviness, but the Dominican Republic was deeper."

Mexico, Colombia and Panama each got a small piece of the pie with a handful of high-profile players each, while less heavily scouted countries in the region like Nicaragua, Curacao and Aruba all had at least one player signed for a six-figure bonus. Action in the Pacific Rim was modest, with notable signings coming from South Korea, Taiwan and Australia. It wasn't a particularly noteworthy year in Europe, though teams still pulled players from Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the Czech Republic.

Of course the biggest variable in the international market is always Cuba, since the available talent pool fluctuates wildly depending on which players leave the island. There were nearly 30 Cuban signings last year. Most were fringy prospects, but the best Cuban signed last year was Rangers center fielder Leonys Martin, who got a $5 million bonus as part of a $15.6 million major league contract. Cubans were making a splash early in 2012, with Oakland's four-year, $36 million major league deal for outfielder Yoenis Cespedes and the Cubs giving a reported $6 million major league deal to lefthander Gerardo Concepcion. Meanwhile, 20-year-old right fielder Jorge Soler and a handful of other intriguing names are still waiting on their residency papers and free agency to be able to sign.

"I actually thought 2011 was very overvalued," said a second American League international director. "There weren't any elite arms, I didn't think. You were betting on some guys who I think there wasn't a lot of consensus on. I thought it was a down year myself and I was surprised at those numbers for that talent."

Top Players

There was no consensus No. 1 player in last year's class, but the majority of scouts who spoke with BA felt that Dominican outfielders Ronald Guzman and Elier Hernandez were the top players available. Guzman netted a $3.45 million bonus from the Rangers on July 2, while Hernandez signed the same day with the Royals for $3 million. Guzman is a tall, lanky corner outfielder/first baseman with an advanced offensive approach and a loose, fluid swing, while Hernandez is a lean, strong righthanded hitter with terrific bat speed and a hard line-drive swing.

Yet neither Guzman nor Hernandez received the most money last year. Instead, that went to Dominican outfielder Nomar Mazara, who set a new international amateur bonus record on July 2 when the Rangers gave him $4.95 million, eclipsing the old mark set by Athletics Dominican righthander Michael Ynoa, who got $4.25 million in 2008. Mazara showed huge raw power in batting practice, but many teams were wary of his propensity to swing and miss in game situations, so the signing was widely viewed throughout the industry as a significant overpay.

Mazara wasn't the only big surprise. The Mariners gave $1.925 million to Venezuelan corner outfielder Jose Leal, who many teams considered a raw project. Teams were surprised when rumors emerged before July 2 that the Royals might go to $1 million for Dominican shortstop Adalberto Mondesi, so it was even more surprising when they signed him for $2 million. Colombian outfielder Harold Ramirez scoring a $1.05 million bonus from the Pirates was another one that seemed like a stretch for many other clubs.

"In last year's class, there was some difference of opinions on some of those premier guys," said a National League international scouting director. "I'm not sure everyone was as convinced as the teams that ended up with them, but that's not all that unusual."

Among infielders, Dominican shortstops Dorssys Paulino (Indians) and Dawel Lugo (Blue Jays) stood out for their bats. Some teams also liked the offensive potential of Dominican shortstop Luis Acosta (Cubs) and Venezuela's Wuilmer Becerra (Blue Jays). Both players spent time showcasing at shortstop, but Becerra is already an outfielder and Acosta will probably end up in left field. Venezuelan center fielder Carlos Tocci (Phillies) is a potential two-way threat who has received strong early reviews for his play at instructional league and in the Liga Paralela, the minor league version of the Venezuelan League.

Venezuela had a strong catching crop, led by the offensive-oriented Mark Malave (Cubs), the more defensively-polished Jose Ruiz (Padres) and the solid all-around play of Jose Garcia (Mets). Pitching is always difficult to project at 16, but the two best current arms are Venezuelan righthander Victor Sanchez (Mariners) and Mexican righthander Roberto Osuna (Blue Jays), both of whom have touched 94 mph and were standouts for their respective countries in international tournaments.

No team made more noise in the international market than the Rangers, whose estimated $12.8 million in international spending (not including the major league deal for Martin) was more than $5 million ahead of the second-biggest spender, the Blue Jays ($7.6 million). The Blue Jays and Royals have both been aggressive internationally in recent years, and both revved up their spending last year. The Mariners are always a threat to sign top players from any country, and they continued that trend last year. The Pirates and Cubs both spent heavily again in 2011, with the Cubs going after Cubans harder than any other team in baseball. The Padres, Tigers and Indians all increased their international expenditures from 2010 and were among the top 10 in bonuses awarded in 2011.

Role Changes

Several teams also shuffled leadership positions in their international scouting departments after the 2011 season. The White Sox hired Marco Paddy away from the Blue Jays as a special assistant to the general manager in charge of international operations. The Blue Jays replaced Paddy by hiring Ismael Cruz away from the Mets and naming him a special assistant for Latin American operations. The Mets' new international scouting director is Chris Becerra, who had been their west coast crosschecker.

Elsewhere, the Athletics promoted Sam Geaney from a scouting coordinator to coordinator of international scouting after his predecessor Dan Kantrovitz became the Cardinals' scouting director. Eddie Romero moved up from Boston's assistant director of international operations and international scouting to become the team's new international scouting director after the Red Sox parted ways with former vice president of player personnel and international operations Craig Shipley. New Orioles general manager Dan Duquette brought on board Fred Ferreira as Baltimore's new director of international recruiting and named Ray Poitevint the team's executive director of international baseball, though David Stockstill remains in the organization as the team's director of international operations.

The league office made changes as well. A year ago Kim Ng left her post as an assistant general manager with the Dodgers to become MLB's senior vice president of baseball operations, putting her in charge of overseeing the league's international efforts. Former Puerto Rican attorney general Jorge Perez-Diaz had been serving as an interim replacement for Sandy Alderson, who left his post with MLB overseeing the league's Latin American reforms in November 2010 to become the GM of the Mets. After the 2011 season, MLB named Rafael Perez its new director of Dominican operations. Perez had been the Mets' director of international operations and had previously worked for MLB from 2002-2005 as the league's senior manager of Latin American operations. The league has also added additional personnel to its international operations staff as it prepares for an international draft that commissioner Bud Selig has termed "inevitable" and could be in place within the next few years.

As the league moves toward its goal of an international draft, it has increased the presence of the MLB scouting bureau in Latin America and organized its own showcases. MLB held a successful showcase in Venezuela last April that featured many of the country's top prospects. MLB has tried to organize similar showcases in the Dominican Republic, and while team officials say they have scouts show up to be supportive of the league, those events typically haven't attracted the best talent. That changed this year in February, when MLB coordinated an event at the Mets' Dominican academy featuring games between a team of top Dominican prospects and top Venezuelan prospects. Scouts praised the event and said many of the best players from this year's July 2 class were in attendance.

While MLB tries to become more involved in organizing the showcasing of players, other trainers have joined forces to form their own leagues, most notably the Dominican Prospect League founded by Brian Mejia and Ulises Cabrera in the fall of 2009. Last year some of the DPL's trainers—most prominently Enrique Soto, Amauris Nina and Astin Jacobo—parted ways with the DPL and formed another circuit known as the International Prospect League. Of the players who got the top 20 bonuses from the Dominican Republic last year, eight of them were DPL players, not counting players like Hernandez and Tigers third baseman Adelyn Santa who played in the league early in the year before their trainers moved them to the IPL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 16, 2012, 01:51:50 pm
Cubs claim De La Cruz

The race for openings in the Brewers’ bullpen lost a competitor Friday when the Cubs claimed right-hander Frankie De La Cruz, a hard-thrower who was having a tough time commanding the baseball this spring. De La Cruz faced 21 batters in three Cactus League outings, allowed hits to seven of them, walked three and hit two with pitches. He also threw two wild pitches and surrendered seven earned runs in 3 1/3 innings, for am 18.90 ERA.

De La Cruz had a strong 2011 season, going 7-6 with a 3.88 ERA at Triple-A Nashville, mostly as a starter, before a promotion to Milwaukee. He posted a 2.77 ERA in 11 big-league relief appearances. His average fastball was 91.6 mph, still effective but slightly down from the 94 mph he’d thrown for the Tigers, Marlins and Padres from 2007-09.


The Brewers now have 39 players on the 40-man roster. They’ll need a couple of spots before Opening Day if non-roster invitees like Cesar Izturis and Brooks Conrad make the club.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 16, 2012, 01:56:52 pm
So I guess the Cubs weren't clearing a roster space for Soler, huh?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on March 16, 2012, 03:19:27 pm
"Mexico, Colombia and Panama each got a small piece of the pie with a handful of high-profile players each, while less heavily scouted countries in the region like Nicaragua, Curacao and Aruba all had at least one player signed for a six-figure bonus. Action in the Pacific Rim was modest, with notable signings coming from South Korea, Taiwan and Australia. It wasn't a particularly noteworthy year in Europe, though teams still pulled players from Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the Czech Republic."

Three questions:

1. When did New Zealand move to Europe?

2. How did they do it?

3. How did Ben Badler find out about it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 17, 2012, 06:22:19 pm
Lake with a long home run to just about dead center.  Clevenger with his second of the year if I remember correctly.  And Cardenas with an opposite field homer to left center.  Pitching stunk, although Samardzija looked good for the most part.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on March 19, 2012, 05:23:17 pm
Don't know if it's a guess, but Jim Callis told someone today that he thinks Javier Baez and Dan Vogelbach start the season in Peoria. He seemed to indicate the same on Dillon Maples but qualified it by saying that they might want to keep Maples out of the cold early on.

Incidentally, Vogelbach hit a mammoth home run Saturday according to Az Phil.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 19, 2012, 05:55:14 pm
Peoria could have an interesting team this year.  Possibilities for their roster, in addition to Vogelbach and Baez, are Concepcion, Candelario, Wellington Cruz, and conceivably, Soler.

If more than a couple of the above are there, I will probably travel up to Beloit a couple of times.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on March 19, 2012, 09:49:59 pm
Me too Dave, it's only 30 minutes away
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 19, 2012, 10:17:31 pm
I'll buy the beer if you buy the hot dogs.  (Since probably neither of us drink beer, it's good I had first choice).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 19, 2012, 10:47:07 pm
 drive up and drink the beer for both of you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 20, 2012, 12:38:08 pm
I think I see Wayne Gretzky over here at Fitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 20, 2012, 12:50:01 pm
One of these Cubans we signed, Balaguert, is looks like a truck.  Hard to believe he's 19.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 20, 2012, 01:07:26 pm
Candelario isn't looking too impressive against the lefty batting practice pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on March 20, 2012, 01:11:22 pm
Ooh, nice.  Live posting.  Keep it up, JR!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 20, 2012, 01:37:55 pm
Candelario is definately better hitting left handed rather than right handed.  Most of his power comes from the left side.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 20, 2012, 01:59:15 pm
JR, go talk to Wayne Gretzky and ask him about his son's health status, how the rehab is going, and when he figures to actually start to play. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 20, 2012, 02:09:45 pm
JR, instead of asking Gretzky any boring stuff about his son, ask him if he liked the movie "Slap Shot," or if he ever knew anyone like the Hanson brothers in it....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 20, 2012, 07:03:34 pm
JR, go talk to Wayne Gretzky and ask him about his son's health status, how the rehab is going, and when he figures to actually start to play. 

Lol, yeah should have thought about that.  That was pretty cool just seeing him sitting around with his family watching his son take BP and do fielding drills.  Seemed like just a regular guy. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 20, 2012, 07:24:48 pm
I guess there's not really too much you can take from watching guys do BP and fielding drills, but it's still kind of neat to see four fields full of Cub minor leaguers doing drills, taking BP, etc.

It definitely has more of an international feel than the last time I was over at Fitch four years ago.  The Cubs must have at least a dozen Asian players in their farm system now, and seemingly prospects from all over the world.  It was kind of funny seeing Javier Baez, Garrett Schlect, and Pin-Chieh Chen all chatting it up together during BP.  A real United Nations now with the Cubs farm system! 

Like I said, I can't really say I learned a whole lot from watching drills and BP.  I guess I was borderline disappointed in watching some of the more touted guys from the DSL, like Candelario and Penalver.  Candelario was actually hitting left handed against the lefty batting practice pitcher for some reason, and he looked like one of the worst hitters I saw.  Not sure what was up with that.  And I'm not sure Penalver is all that much bigger than Torreyes, which I thought for a guy who was supposed to be our other top prospect in the DSL, I would have thought he would have been a little more impressive physically.

The one guy who opened my eyes a little bit, for no other reason than just how much bigger he was than all the other teenagers out there, was Yasiel Balaguert, who was one of the two Cubans we signed in December.  He looked like he could handle the bat fairly well during BP too, although who knows how well that translates to games.  It'll be interesting to see how he does this year. 

All in all, it's a pretty neat way to kill time before the big league game if for nothing else.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on March 20, 2012, 07:27:22 pm
I'm gonna be in Scottsdale this weekend and plan to see a game on Saturday.  I'm really looking forward to it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 20, 2012, 07:29:51 pm
Play, Saturday's probably when I'm heading home, but if I'm still around, I'll give you a shout.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on March 20, 2012, 07:36:48 pm
Sounds good, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 20, 2012, 07:54:10 pm
Play, you can take him anywhere and tell him it's Morton's Steak House.  Hillbillies aren't very bright.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 20, 2012, 08:23:15 pm
Play, you can take him anywhere and tell him it's Morton's Steak House.  Hillbillies aren't very bright.

Plus, he's a hillbilly Cub fan.  He's a double dope.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 21, 2012, 12:09:05 am
I'm gonna be in Scottsdale this weekend and plan to see a game on Saturday.  I'm really looking forward to it.
Have lunch at the Pink Pony before the game.  The place has lots of interesting baseball memorabilia.

http://www.pinkponyrestaurant.com/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on March 21, 2012, 06:59:52 am
Thanks for the tip, Cactus.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on March 21, 2012, 04:47:57 pm
In the "whatever this means nothing" department, Hoyer has come out and said the Soler rumors are bogus.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 21, 2012, 05:05:17 pm
What Hoyer actually said was that the rumors that the Cubs already had an agreement with Soler are bogus.  Since any formal agreement would be against the rules, this amounts to a non-denial denial as to whether the Cubs consider themselves to have an inside track. The media has engaged in all sorts of speculation and Hoyer is just dispatching the claim that an agreement is already in place.  No telling where things are between the Cubs and Soler other than that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 21, 2012, 05:51:09 pm
Chicago Cubs
Released: RHP Yohan Gonzalez, RHP Jordan Latham, SS Rafael Valdes, OF Ben Klafczynski, OF Blair Springfield

The Cubs drafted Blair Springfield out of a Decatur, Ill., high school in the seventh round of the ’09 draft, but he never advanced past short-season Boise in three seasons.

The Cubs signed Cuban defector Rafael Valdes last February and released him little more than a year later. He batted .263/.319/.371 in 232 at-bats last season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 21, 2012, 06:46:46 pm
Ron Villone replaces Peoria pitching coach Tom Pratt who was recently diagnosed with brain cancer and has begun chemotherapy in Arizona.

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120321&content_id=27476062&vkey=pr_t443&fext=.jsp&sid=t443
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 22, 2012, 10:18:47 am

Baseball America's annual organization talent rankings evaluate the overall value of each system's prospect-eligible players (no more than 130 at-bats, 50 innings or 30 relief appearances in the major leagues, without regard to service time). Baseball America's editors determined the rankings.

1. Texas Rangers
2. Kansas City Royals
3. San Diego Padres
4. Arizona Diamondbacks
5. Toronto Blue Jays
6. Seattle Mariners
7. Oakland Athletics
8. Tampa Bay Rays
9. Boston Red Sox
10. St. Louis Cardinals
11. Pittsburgh Pirates
12. Washington Nationals
13. New York Yankees
14. Chicago Cubs
15. Atlanta Braves
16. Cincinnati Reds
17. Colorado Rockies
18. Houston Astros
19. Los Angeles Angels
20. Minnesota Twins
21. Baltimore Orioles
22. San Francisco Giants
23. Detroit Tigers
24. Los Angeles Dodgers
25. New York Mets
26. Milwaukee Brewers
27. Philadelphia Phillies
28. Miami Marlins
29. Cleveland Indians
30. Chicago White Sox
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on March 22, 2012, 01:13:29 pm
Keith Law chat...who is the Cuban outfielder he is referring to?

Quote

Dale (KY)
Can you give me some guys from the lower levels of the Cubs system to be excited about?

Klaw  (2:10 PM)
Baez (that's some of the easiest power I've ever seen, including to the opposite field), Candelario, Dunston, the Cuban outfielder whose name I won't try to spell. Saw all those guys yesterday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 22, 2012, 01:40:40 pm
Interesting that Keith Law mentioned Dunston as someone to get excited about. That was a surprise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on March 22, 2012, 01:42:47 pm
BR..he probably is referring to Silva
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 22, 2012, 01:44:52 pm
I have heard that Beleguert SP? has been a pleasant surprise so far in the camp.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on March 22, 2012, 03:10:56 pm
Yasiel Balaquert.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 22, 2012, 03:17:06 pm
Yes, he's obviously referring to Balaguert.  He's got a strong arm, and JR says he's built. 

Az Phil mentioned him the other day, said he pulled a classic baserunning mistake, taking off on a 2-out 3-2 pitch.... when he was on 2nd base, not 1st.  When Vogelbach took the pitch for ball four, there's Balaguert running up on Dunston who was on 3rd.  Oops. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on March 22, 2012, 03:44:46 pm
Beleaguered - great name for a Cubs prospect
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on March 22, 2012, 04:40:21 pm
Deleaguere might be more appropriate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on March 23, 2012, 03:35:49 pm
From Keith Law Cactus League report today:

• The Cubs threw reliever Alberto Cabrera, who has one of the most electric fastballs I've seen from a prospect in a long time -- but doesn't have much else. That fastball was 95-97 for two innings with plus-plus sinking life, and he was around the plate with it a lot more than you'd expect given its movement. His changeup was dead-straight and very hittable, while the slider is short but not sharp; one of those two pitches has to come along this year for him to be a viable bullpen option, but he can probably go further than most relievers with one pitch because of its velocity and life.

• Chicago's Rule 5 pick, right-hander Lendy Castillo, also showed a good arm, 90-93 hard to his arm side with some feel for a slider in the low 80s, but he's pretty raw overall and lost his command after four or five batters, walking in a run in the process.

• First baseman Anthony Rizzo (No. 36 on my top 100) played in that game as well, taking some good at-bats, one of which ended in a line drive single to the left-center gap off a 92 mph fastball from left-hander Michael Kirkman, significant in that and inability to lefties is the major hole in Rizzo's game right now. He's got his hands out from his body more than I'd like to see, as it might give him trouble covering the inner half, but the swing works once he gets his hands started and the approach remains a strength.

• On the minor league side on Wednesday, Cubs shortstop prospect Javier Baez, No. 95 on my top 100 and their first pick in the 2011 Rule 4 draft, showed unbelievable power with a big home run to the opposite field at Fitch Park where he didn't even fully square the ball up, only to have it take off when it left his bat. Baez later showed his youth and rawness on a three-pitch strikeout where he had already started his two-strike swing before the pitcher had released the ball.

• The same game featured Cuban outfielder Yasiel Balaguert, who the Cubs signed in December for about $350,000. He's got a young face but a somewhat mature body without much room left to fill out (except in the wrong way). The swing is pretty solid, with good weight transfer and some hip rotation to create loft; his back side goes a little soft and I didn't see him get the head of the bat down at all, as he seemed to want the ball up so he could drive it. He has bat speed and strength, but is a fringy to average runner who has to stay in right field. He's not an elite prospect but one worth watching because of the potential to hit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 23, 2012, 03:50:05 pm
Dale Sveum seems to like Brett Jackson.

Carrie Muskat
Sveum on B-Jackson: "He's the best young player I've seen in Major League camp. I've seen some good young ones."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 23, 2012, 05:05:47 pm
More from Sveum on Jackson (and Rizzo), via Carrie Muskat:

"He brings so much to the table," Sveum said. "I'm in my ninth year coaching in the big leagues and he's the best young player I've seen in Major League camp. I've seen some good young ones. He's the full package. Obviously, the swing and miss is something he needs to work on and cutting down strikeouts, but he brings a lot to the table for a Major League team."
 
... "[Jackson] is a very professional young man who works as hard as anybody every single day," Sveum said. "He's one of those special kids who doesn't accept mediocrity when he comes out here on the field, whether he's playing in the game or not. He's going to try to make himself a better player. I think him and Rizzo, once they get here, they're going to be leaders of the team where they don't allow their teammates to accept mediocrity either."

All they need is a chance.

"Those two guys, when they get back here, they're probably not going to leave for a long time, they're that special of players," Sveum said of Jackson and Rizzo. "It's just a matter of when."


Sweet music to the ears.  Hope it all turns out to be true.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: UK on March 23, 2012, 05:16:34 pm
If they swing and miss in HS and College, they're going to do it in pro-ball. He's gifted enough to where it won't make or break him. Even if he lights it up in Des Moines, he's going to have awkward ABs.

Dave, you going to be headed to Beloit on April 5-7? Let me know ahead of time and I'll get you tix ahead of time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 23, 2012, 06:47:46 pm
UK - thank for the offer, but I will not be returning from florida until the end of April.  Hopefully, they will come in to Beloit again in the summer, and I will certainly be there then.

In the meantime, I look forward to any reports you have on the games.  It looks like they may have some pretty good talent as far as position players are concerned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on March 24, 2012, 04:48:11 am
Anyone have access to the Vogelbach/Baez piece in Baseball America?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 24, 2012, 02:46:41 pm
Cubs' Javier Baez, Dan Vogelbach Developing A Healthy Rivalry

 By J.J. Cooper
 March 23, 2012
 
  (http://www.baseballamerica.com/images/social-media/twitter-follow-cooper.png)  (http://twitter.com/jjcoop36) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/email.gif)E-mail (?subject=Baseball%20America:%20Cubs%27%20Javier%20Baez%2C%20Dan%20Vogelbach%20Developing%20A%20Healthy%20Rivalry&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseballamerica.com%2Fonline%2Fprospects%2Fprospect-pulse%2F2012%2F2613130.html) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/print.gif)Print
 
 If everything works out as the Cubs' hope, at some point in the future, Javier Baez will be snaring grounders at Wrigley Field and firing them across the diamond to first baseman Dan Vogelbach.
 
 For now, the top two picks in the Cubs' 2011 draft are getting ready on the back fields of the club's facility in Mesa, Ariz., as they ready to head to low Class A Peoria together.
 
 And as you would expect with two Type A teenagers, they don't mind a little healthy competition.
 
 "They are working on the same field. They can push each other. It's been good for both of them. There's some healthy competitiveness for those two. They are playing with a lot of enthusiasm," Cubs senior vice president for scouting and player development Jason McLeod said.
 
 "When they were hitting in the same group, there were times when we thought maybe we may need to split these guys up in the hitting groups. They looked like they were having their own personal home run derby."
 
 The two have since settled down from the BP sessions that focused more on bombs than line drives. But Cubs front-office types aren't too upset to see that both Baez and Vogelbach want to prove they belong in the middle of a lineup. The two are expected to begin the season together in low Class A Peoria, and Baez has shown enough at shortstop that there aren't any plans to move him anytime soon.
 
 "I was a guy when I saw him when I was in San Diego I thought he should immediately play third. He's actually playing pretty good over there. The plan is to leave him there as long as (he shows he can handle it)," McLeod said.
 
 While Baez's biggest question mark for the long-term is which position he'll end up at, the squatty Vogelbach faces many of the questions that dogged a young Prince Fielder—will he stay slim enough to handle first base. After instructional league last year, the Cubs sent Vogelbach home with a nutrition and workout plan to ensure he arrived to spring training in good shape.
 
 "He showed up in spring training having shown the fruits of his labor," McLeod said. "Lets face it, that will always be a part of his routine. He's a thicker guy. He knows he'll always have to maintain himself. He knows he has to work to be flexible and play defense and take pride in that part of that game as well."
 
 • While Baez will play shortstop in Peoria, the Cubs are working on getting a couple of more veteran prospects some versatility. The offseason trade of D.J. LeMahieu and the loss of Ryan Flaherty in the Rule 5 draft helped eliminate some of the Cubs' surplus of third-base types in the upper minors, but even with them gone, Junior Lake and Josh Vitters give the Cubs a pair of upper-level prospects whose best position may be the hot corner.
 
 To give them some versatility, Vitters is expected to play some first base and left field again this season, while Lake will spend plenty of time at third base this year after primarily playing shortstop last year.
 
 • While Baez and Voglebach appear ticketed for low Class A, righthander Dillon Maples, a 14th-round pick out of a Southern Pines, N.C. high school who signed last August for $2.5 million, is not going to be joining them anytime soon.
 
 The Cubs want Maples to work in extended spring training on improving his direction to the plate, cleaning up his delivery and becoming more consistent  with his release point. He's been slowed by a minor arm problem that has kept him off the mound for part of spring training as well, which helped ensure he'll stay back in camp when the full season clubs head out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 24, 2012, 02:48:29 pm
Chicago Cubs Top signing: C Mark Malave, Venezuela, $1.6 million.
 July 2 eligible seven- and six-figure signings: SS Luis Acosta (Dominican Republic), 3B Ricardo Marcano (Venezuela), LHP Christopher Pieters (Curacao), LHP Carlos Rodriguez (Venezuela).
 Other six-figure signings: LHP Frank Del Valle (Cuba), OF Yasiel Balaguert (Cuba), RHP Carlos Martinez (Cuba), RHP Pedro Araujo (Dominican Republic).
 
 The Cubs' international department has found several promising players in recent years, including Dominican Starlin Castro and Korean shortstop Hak-Ju Lee, who was a critical piece in the Matt Garza trade and is now the No. 44 prospect in baseball. There is a younger wave of international talent still on the way, with players like shortstop Marco Hernandez and third baseman Jeimer Candelario in the lower levels of the system. In 2011, the Cubs were again one of the most aggressive teams in the international market, adding a handful of offensive-oriented position prospects and a host of lefthanded pitchers.
 
 Chicago's top signing last year was Mark Malave, a Venezuelan catcher who signed for $1.6 million on July 2. Scouts in Venezuela have followed Malave for years. As a 13-year-old at the 14U Pan American championship, Malave was the youngest player on a Venezuelan team that included Rangers shortstop Rougned Odor, Blue Jays righthander Adonys Cardona and Mariners righthander Victor Sanchez. Malave hit .467 (7-for-15) with a home run, a pair of doubles and a walk at the tournament. He spent considerable time as a third baseman and occasionally shortstop before moving behind the plate to work out for teams.
 
 Malave, a 17-year-old from Miranda who trained with Ciro Barrios, was a dominant hitter on the youth national circuit and scouts expect he will post strong numbers early in his career. He got off to a good start after signing by hitting .286/.402/.364 in 92 plate appearances this winter in the Liga Paralela, the minor league version of the Venezuelan League. Many of Malave's offensive traits and mannerisms are advanced for his age, including his ability to work the count and get on base. He shows power in batting practice, though he's still learning to use it in games. Malave is a switch-hitter, but his righthanded swing is more advanced, as he tends to guide the bat from the left side. Several scouts expressed concerns about his bat speed from both sides of the plate, noting that the power he showed in BP is more a result of his advanced physical maturity, and he may swing and miss against more advanced pitching. Malave is strong but unlike Padres Venezuelan catcher Jose Ruiz, Malave's body lacks athleticism and flexibility. The Cubs list him at 6-foot-3, 185 pounds, but scouts say he has a thick, squatty frame that lacks projection and is a below-average runner. He has a plus arm with a short arm stroke, but if he's going to catch he'll have to put in a ton of work on his receiving. In the Liga Parlalela, he mostly played third base, which is where he could end up playing, but he's not a lock to stick there either.
 
 The Blue Jays were pursuing Luis Acosta, but the Cubs swooped in and signed him for $1.1 million on July 2. Acosta, a 17-year-old who trained with Valentin Monero and was represented by Rob Plummer, worked out for teams in the Dominican Republic at shortstop but he's probably a left fielder in the future. The Cubs bought Acosta for his offensive potential. His hands get started easily with a short load, leading to an efficient stroke with good bat speed, though his swing can get a bit mechanical at times. He hits lasers out of the park in batting practice, but scouts have said he opens his hips early and buckles against breaking balls in games. Acosta may have tried out for teams as a shortstop, but he doesn't run well or have great range, his arm is neither strong nor accurate and his actions and footwork mean he's likely destined for left field.
 
 By our estimates on international amateur spending (http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/international-affairs/2012/2613090.html), the Cubs spent $4.54 million last year, excluding Cuban amateurs. One of the reasons we take out Cubans out of those numbers is that many Cubans really are professional players who played in Cuba's top league, Serie Nacional, including teenagers. Still, those players are evaluated by each team's international scouting department, often in the Dominican Republic after they leave or in other countries at international tournaments. In the case of the Cubs, they are extremely aggressive in the Cuban market; of the nearly 30 Cuban signings last year, the Cubs signed nine of them, though 2011 wasn't a great year for Cuban signings aside from Rangers center fielder Leonys Martin. Overall, the Cubs spent $1.67 million in the Cuban market last year, and that doesn't include the reported $6 million major league package they gave to 20-year-old lefthander Gerardo Concepcion this year.
 
 The Cubs' most expensive Cuban signing last year was lefthander Frank Del Valle, who was represented by Wellington Gonzalez and signed for an $800,000 bonus in June. Del Valle, 22, was one of the better youth pitchers in Cuba, but he pitched for Metropolitanos in Cuba's Serie Nacional and didn't fare well. A thick, undersized 5-foot-11, 190 pounds, Del Valle reached high Class A Daytona but spent most of last year in low Class A Peoria, where he had a 2.95 ERA in 42 2/3 innings with 31 strikeouts and 11 walks. Scouts who saw Del Valle said there wasn't much about him that jumped out. His fastball parks in the high 80s, touches 91 and he complements it with an average slider.
 
 The Cubs also signed Cuban outfielder Yasiel Balaguert for $400,000 and righthander Carlos Martinez for $250,000 in December. Both players were represented by Jaime Torres, who also represented Concepcion, outfielder Rubi Silva ($1 million in 2010) and catcher Yaniel Cabezas ($500,000 in 2010), among other Cubs signings. At 19, Balaguert doesn't have any carrying tools but he was one of the better hitters in Cuba's junior leagues and played for Cuba's junior national team in 2010 at the World Junior Championship in Thunder Bay, Ontario. Balaguert hit .200/.300/.240 in 25 at-bats in Thunder Bay, though he had played better the previous year at the World Youth Championship in Taiwan, where he hit .333/.387/.519 in 27 at-bats. At 6-foot, 190 pounds, Balaguert has a strong, thick frame, a quick bat and finishes with good extension. When he squares one up, the ball can jump off his bat and he flashes average power potential. Getting to his power will be a challenge for Balaguert with his uphill swing that leads to a lot of swings and misses and could get him exposed against pro pitching. Balaguert played center field as an amateur and shows solid defensive instincts and routes, but he's a fringy runner at best with an average arm, so his best defensive home may be left field.
 
 Martinez, 20, pitched on youth and junior national teams in Cuba as a teenager, then joined Serie Nacional to play for Industriales. He pitched his final season in Cuba in 2009-10, when he had a 5.48 ERA in 23 innings with more walks (23) than strikeouts (19) working out of the bullpen. At 6-foot-4, 215 pounds, Martinez has a thick frame and a low 90s fastball. Every once in a while Martinez flashes an average curveball, but most scouts said it's usually a below-average, slurvy offering. His changeup shows occasional fade but is also below-average.
 
 Third baseman Ricardo Marcano drew attention in Venezuela for his sweet lefty swing before the Cubs signed him for $400,000 on July 2. Marcano, 16, trained with Hernan Albornoz, who had previously worked for the Indians as an assistant in Venezuelan operations. Some scouts think Marcano has the potential to hit for average and power, with a body (6-foot-2, 180 pounds) and swing that remind some scouts in Venezuela of Victor Martinez. Defense is a bit of an adventure for Marcano, whose hands and footwork aren't ideal for the infield. He has a 40 arm on the 20-80 scale, but some scouts said they could see an average arm eventually. Either way, he may be destined for left field, but it's his bat that is the draw.
 
 Curacao has developed some promising prospects in recent years, most notably Rangers shortstop Jurickson Profar and Orioles third baseman Jonathan Schoop. Last year only one player out of Curacao, lefthander Christopher Pieters, signed for a six-figure deal. Pieters, 17, landed a $350,000 bonus from the Cubs in July, though the amount came as a surprise to some scouts. Pieters is a lanky 6-foot-3, 185 pounds with a mid-80s fastball and raw secondary pitches. He went to instructional league and struggled to find the strike zone, so he's still a project for now.
 
 Like Malave and Cubs lefthander Angel Mejias, lefty Carlos Rodriguez also trained with Ciro Barrios and was a former teammate of theirs in youth tournaments in Venezuela. Rodriguez, who turned 16 on July 18, signed with the Cubs for $120,000 in August. Rodriguez isn't tall but he has a strong 5-foot-11, 180-pound frame and stands out for his feel for pitching. Scouts praise his competitiveness and ability to pitch to both sides of the plate with his high-80s fastball, which he backs up with a good changeup for his age and a curveball that reaches the mid-70s that he can throw for strikes, although at times he tends to get around the ball. Rodriguez doesn't have the cleanest delivery, as he throws across his body and he finishes with a head jerk, though it hasn't hampered his ability to hit his spots yet.
 
 Before July 2, the Cubs also signed Dominican righthander Pedro Araujo for $100,000 in May. Araujo, 18, could prove to be a bargain. He made his debut last year in the Dominican Summer League, where he had a 4.45 ERA in 56 2/3 innings with 51 strikeouts and 27 walks. At 6-foot-3, 215 pounds, Araujo has a big, physical frame, a short stride and a low 90s fastball that he throws to set up a solid curveball and a changeup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on March 24, 2012, 03:23:43 pm
Thanks again, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 27, 2012, 10:52:18 pm
Neither of the two Cub farmhands are exactly tearing up spring training.  Flaherty is hitting about .260.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 28, 2012, 11:19:18 am
ArizonaPhil

A number of pitchers are not going to be ready for the start of the season and will be remaining at EXST, including Justin Berg and John Gaub (Iowa), David Cales and Rob Whitenack (Tennessee), Yoannis Negrin and Zac Rosscup (Daytona), Dustin Fitzgerald, Cam Greathouse, Tarlandus Mitchell, and Starling Peralta (Peoria), and Ethan Elias, Arturo Maltos-Garcia, Dillon Maples, and Austin Urban (Boise/Mesa). NOTE: Whitenack (2011 TJS) is ahead oif schedule and is throwing in ST games (one inning only), but he wil be brought along slowly at EXST.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 28, 2012, 11:45:51 am
Good news that Whitenack is ahead of schedule...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 28, 2012, 02:50:56 pm
You don't hear that very often.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 29, 2012, 12:05:22 pm
The Theo compensation is complete.

The Cubs get Jair Bogaerts, a 19-year-old first baseman.



http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=bogaer001jai
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 29, 2012, 12:17:57 pm
Damb.  I thought we would get Dustin Pedroia.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 29, 2012, 12:39:01 pm
Bogaerts struck out 43 times in 156 AB against Dominican League pitching last year.  Probably not a great chance this guy is going to amount to much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on March 29, 2012, 01:50:21 pm
What kind of name is Jair Bogaerts?  Norwegian?  Danish?  No wonder he couldn't hit in the Dominican League--too much sunshine.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on March 29, 2012, 01:51:03 pm
I read somewhere he is from Aruba. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on March 29, 2012, 01:52:40 pm
His brother Xander is a major SS prospect for them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 29, 2012, 02:01:30 pm
Actually, I'm surprised.  Doesn't look like anything special, but at 18, who knows?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 29, 2012, 02:49:25 pm
His OPS improved almost .300 points from his 17 year old season to his 18 year old season.

Hope springs eternal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on March 29, 2012, 02:50:20 pm
Quote
I read somewhere he is from Aruba.

Shows what I know.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 29, 2012, 03:24:40 pm
His OPS improved almost .300 points from his 17 year old season to his 18 year old season.

Hope springs eternal.

K's down by 10 (32% down to 27%) and walks up (only by 1), while his HBP rose from 1 in 2010 to 8 in 2011.  Could be that he has changed his approach at the plate, or at least his position in the batter's box in relation to the plate, perhaps crowding the plate more.

It would be amusing if the Cubs ended up getting more out of the compensation than the Red Sox do.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on March 29, 2012, 08:27:54 pm
From the pitching prospects, I'm looking forward to Whitenack coming back and what he does.  And Dillon Maples.

For hitting, I'm excited to hear about Devoss and Vogelbach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on March 31, 2012, 03:33:59 am
A Time To Worry?

The Cubs have far too many pitching prospects who will be Rule 5 eligible next year (per Arizona Phil) to protect them all, including Trey McNutt, Dae-Eun Rhee, Rob Whitenack, Brooks Raley, Nick Struck, Chris Rusin, Casey Weathers, David Cales, Austin Kirk. Luis Liria, Hung Wen Chen, Willengton Cruz, Starling Peralta, Jay Jackson, Ryan Searle, Larry Suarez and Marcus Hatley. Plus Kyler Burke will be a six-year free agent unless he's added to the roster. That's 18 pitchers competing for at most half that many roster spots.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on March 31, 2012, 06:27:00 am
There's only a few names on that list that I see a need to protect as of now  - Whitenack (though who knows what he'll do after surgery), McNutt, maybe Kirk and Rhee (depending on what he does this year).  The other guys, meh.  Things will shake out at the end of the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 31, 2012, 09:40:29 am
A Time To Worry?

The Cubs have far too many pitching prospects who will be Rule 5 eligible next year (per Arizona Phil) to protect them all, including Trey McNutt, Dae-Eun Rhee, Rob Whitenack, Brooks Raley, Nick Struck, Chris Rusin, Casey Weathers, David Cales, Austin Kirk. Luis Liria, Hung Wen Chen, Willengton Cruz, Starling Peralta, Jay Jackson, Ryan Searle, Larry Suarez and Marcus Hatley. Plus Kyler Burke will be a six-year free agent unless he's added to the roster. That's 18 pitchers competing for at most half that many roster spots.

Meh, most of those guys didn't even crack the Cubs Top 30, and Weathers was even available for every team in the league to pick up a few weeks ago and no one wanted him.  Not to say they aren't prospects and it wouldn't be a shame to lose them down the road, but there aren't a lot of future difference makers on a World Series championship team on that list either.

Every team in baseball has several C grade prospects like many of those that cause some Rule 5 issues, and some of those guys won't even be considered prospects by time the season is over.   If we lose a C grade guy, that's just part of it.  The Phillies lost Lendy Castillo, and while I'm sure they'd rather have him back, he's probably not a future Cy Young award winner either.  And Castillo is a better prospect than several of those guys on that list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 31, 2012, 09:43:58 am
WHERE TO WATCH

A look at where Cubs' Top 20 prospects are likely to start the 2012 season:

No.   Player                Club              Level
1   Anthony Rizzo        Iowa             AAA
2   Brett Jackson         Iowa             AAA
3   Javier Baez            Extended ST   
4   Matt Szczur           Daytona         A+
5   Dillon Maples         Extended ST   
6   Trey McNutt           Iowa             AAA
7   Rafael Dolis           TBD   
8   Robert Whitenack   Disabled List   
9   Reggie Golden       Peoria            A
10   Junior Lake         Tennessee      AA
11   Josh Vitters         Iowa             AAA
12   Ronald Torreyes   Daytona        A+
13   Ben Wells            Peoria           A
14   Dan Vogelbach     Boise            SS
15   Jeimer Candelario Boise            SS
16   Gioskar Amaya     Boise            SS
17   Marco Hernandez  Peoria           A
18   Dave Sappelt       Iowa             AAA
19   Pin-Chieh Chen    Peoria            A
20   Zach Cates          Daytona         A+
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 31, 2012, 10:36:27 am
That's an interesting blend, Cactus, thanks for posting it like that.  That's probably more AAA guy, especially towards the top, than I can remember in a long time if ever.  So Castillo wasn't in the top 20?  He'd be another AAA guy.  Is McNutt really going to open at AAA?  That sounds iffy. 

Using that list, six of the top 20 are short-season guys, plus Whitenack. 

Using that list, Tennessee with just Junior Lake, that's the most prospect-light squad.  I expect that McNutt will be there, and perhaps Beeler isn't too far off the top 20 list. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 31, 2012, 11:24:53 am
WHERE TO WATCH

A look at where Cubs' Top 20 prospects are likely to start the 2012 season:

No.   Player                Club              Level
1   Anthony Rizzo        Iowa             AAA
2   Brett Jackson         Iowa             AAA
3   Javier Baez            Extended ST   
4   Matt Szczur           Daytona         A+
5   Dillon Maples         Extended ST   
6   Trey McNutt           Iowa             AAA
7   Rafael Dolis           TBD   
8   Robert Whitenack   Disabled List   
9   Reggie Golden       Peoria            A
10   Junior Lake         Tennessee      AA
11   Josh Vitters         Iowa             AAA
12   Ronald Torreyes   Daytona        A+
13   Ben Wells            Peoria           A
14   Dan Vogelbach     Boise            SS
15   Jeimer Candelario Boise            SS
16   Gioskar Amaya     Boise            SS
17   Marco Hernandez  Peoria           A
18   Dave Sappelt       Iowa             AAA
19   Pin-Chieh Chen    Peoria            A
20   Zach Cates          Daytona         A+

I'll be disappointed if Vogelbach is in Boise.  But the boy in Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 31, 2012, 12:48:10 pm
That's an interesting blend, Cactus, thanks for posting it like that.  That's probably more AAA guy, especially towards the top, than I can remember in a long time if ever.  So Castillo wasn't in the top 20?  He'd be another AAA guy.  Is McNutt really going to open at AAA?  That sounds iffy. 

Using that list, six of the top 20 are short-season guys, plus Whitenack. 

Using that list, Tennessee with just Junior Lake, that's the most prospect-light squad.  I expect that McNutt will be there, and perhaps Beeler isn't too far off the top 20 list. 

Here's the article I lifted that chart from.  It mentions a few other guys like Dunston and Gretzky.

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120330&content_id=27766904&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc (http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120330&content_id=27766904&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 31, 2012, 01:40:11 pm
Quote
Keep an eye on infielder Junior Lake, 22, who is the same age as Starlin Castro, and some say, has more upside. He will open at Double-A Tennessee but isn't far from the big leagues.
It would be nice to know who it is that thinks Lake has more potential than Castro.   I'm looking forward to reports this summer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on March 31, 2012, 02:24:17 pm
I think that Junior Lake, IF everything breaks his way, has more power potential than Starlin Castro but I don't think Lake will ever become anything close to what Castro will be.

IMO, if Lake ends up in the Majors, it'll be as a Mark DeRosa kind of player -- someone that can play all over but doesn't do anything well enough to be a long-term starter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 31, 2012, 02:25:39 pm
Lake has better tools than Castro.  He has much more power.  He has a much stronger arm.  He has better range.  And he has more speed.

His main weakness is the ability to hit for average.  He is never likely to be able to overcome that, but if he does, he will be a better player than Castro.

I think that is what they mean by "more upside".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 31, 2012, 02:35:27 pm
Junior Lake has more upside than Starlin Castro in the same way than Mike Mallory and Ryan Harvey had more upside than Starlin Castro.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 31, 2012, 02:43:25 pm
Exactly.  Harvey and Mallory never made it.  Lake is not likely to make it.

But the reward is substantial if one DOES make it.

Lake has already advanced further than either Mallory or Harvey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 31, 2012, 02:51:42 pm
From Sveum's comments about Lake this spring I thought we might well seek him for a late season callup.  How did Lake actually do in the spring training games?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 31, 2012, 02:59:17 pm
Not very well, as I recall, in the ML games.  I believe he has done much better in the minor league games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 31, 2012, 03:08:56 pm
Junior Lake has more upside than Starlin Castro in the same way than Mike Mallory and Ryan Harvey had more upside than Starlin Castro.

If you took hitting out of baseball, the game would change somewhat and so would the personnel who advance in the game. 

If you ignore hitting, there are probably thousands of football and basketball players who have more upside that Castro. 

I think hitting will stay part of the game, though, at least through the current CBA. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 31, 2012, 03:09:42 pm
.143/.250/.476/.726

3 for 21 with a double, two home runs, three walks, six strikeouts, and three stolen bases in three attempts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 31, 2012, 03:37:49 pm
I don't think that anyone is taking "hitting" out of the equation.  But I believe that many baseball people believe that there is a greater possibility of a prospect to learn "hitting" than it is to learn power, speed or arm strength.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 31, 2012, 03:44:45 pm
Flaherty has hit 245 with one home run for the orioles.  Have they announced whether he will make the 25 man squad, and if he doesn't make it, should the Cubs take him back, or try to make a trade for him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 31, 2012, 04:13:41 pm
Flaherty has hit 245 with one home run for the orioles.  Have they announced whether he will make the 25 man squad, and if he doesn't make it, should the Cubs take him back, or try to make a trade for him?

Whether the Cubs should take him back or look for a trade would depend entirely on scouting evaluations and what the Orioles might offer.

My expectation is that regardless what should be done, the Theocracy will not want him back and will prefer cutting one more tie to the Hendry era.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 31, 2012, 06:17:23 pm
Epstein has not done that as much as many have, such as Dallas Green, who got rid of the majority of the farm system, including several that went on to have very good careers.

And surprisingly, he has kept in place not only almost all of the scouts, but almost all of the front office people, including Wilken and Fleita.  He has just added on to them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 31, 2012, 06:41:27 pm
Flaherty has hit 245 with one home run for the orioles.  Have they announced whether he will make the 25 man squad, and if he doesn't make it, should the Cubs take him back, or try to make a trade for him?

Update On This Year's Rule 5 Draft Picks

By Mike Axisa [March 31 at 5:49pm CST]

Players selected in the annual Rule 5 Draft must remain on their new team's 25-man active roster all season, or be passed through waivers and offered back to their original club. Here's an update on the 12 players taken in December's draft...

Rhiner Cruz, RHP, Astros (from Mets) -- Competing with Henry Sosa and Lucas Harrell for the final bullpen spot.
Terry Doyle, RHP, Twins (from White Sox) -- Returned to ChiSox earlier this month.
Lucas Luetge, LHP, Mariners (from Brewers) -- Luetge made Seattle's Opening Day roster.
Ryan Flaherty, IF, Orioles (from Cubs) -- Flaherty is the favorite for Baltimore's utility infield job.
Cesar Cabral, LHP Yankees (from Red Sox via Royals) -- Cabral suffered a stress fracture in his elbow last night and will start the season on the DL.
Lendy Castillo, RHP, Cubs (from Phillies) -- The Cubs are expected to carry Castillo on their roster to start the season.
Gustavo Nunez, IF, Pirates (from Tigers) -- Nunez was placed on the 60-day DL with an ankle injury back in February.
Robert Fish, LHP, Braves (from Angels) -- Fish is battling a sore elbow and is headed to see Dr. James Andrews for a second opinion.
Erik Komatsu, OF, Cardinals (from Nationals) -- The Cardinals will carry Komatsu as an extra outfielder to start the season.
Marwin Gonzalez, IF, Astros (from Cubs via Red Sox) -- Gonzalez's chances of making the team appear to depend on the health of Jed Lowrie's thumb.
Brett Lorin, RHP, Diamondbacks (from Pirates) -- There doesn't appear to be any room in Arizona's bullpen for Lorin.
Brad Meyers, RHP, Yankees (from Nationals) -- Meyers injured his shoulder during an offseason workout and has not appeared in a game this spring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 01, 2012, 03:20:23 pm
Marquis Smith was released today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 01, 2012, 03:58:27 pm
Damb.

They're writing off the playoffs already.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 01, 2012, 09:13:57 pm
This is from a phil rogers article:
"-- Yasiel Balaquert. Built for power and blessed with a cannon arm, the former member of Cuba's junior national team was looking for a $10 million deal when he defected in 2010. He went unsigned for more than a year before taking a reported $400,000 from the Cubs."

That is seriously aiming high ...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 01, 2012, 09:59:20 pm
There was speculation in January 2011 that San Diego was willing to go as high as 12 million.

So much for speculation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 01, 2012, 10:00:36 pm
So was Balaquert in Spring Training?  How did he look?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 01, 2012, 10:40:42 pm
From what I heard, fat.

Scouting reports have said that he is a mediocre defensive player at best, and can only succeed if he actually achieves his offensive potential.

There has been some talk going around that the Cubs are considering trying him out as catcher.  He has the arm for it, and would not need as much offense as a corner outfielder should provide.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 02, 2012, 02:28:43 am
Vogelbach and Baez will start the year in extended spring training. Too bad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 02, 2012, 12:14:23 pm
Peoria Chiefs roster

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120401&content_id=27830444&vkey=pr_t443&fext=.jsp&sid=t443 (http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120401&content_id=27830444&vkey=pr_t443&fext=.jsp&sid=t443)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 02, 2012, 03:13:55 pm
Daytona press release:


Quote
The Daytona Cubs Organization has announced its tentative 2012 Opening Day roster. Looking to defend the 2011 Florida State League Championship, Daytona welcomes back 12 players from the 2011 roster (six pitchers, six position players) and boasts seven players who were drafted in the top five rounds of the MLB Draft (RHP Hayden Simpson 16th overall '10, LHP Austin Kirk third round '09, RHP Brett Wallach third round (LAD) '09, C Micah Gibbs third round '10, RHP A.J. Morris fourth round (WAS) '09, RHP Tony Zych fourth round '11, OF Matt Szczur fifth round '10). The roster consists of 13 pitchers (nine RHP, four LHP), two catchers, six infielders and three outfielders.

Szczur will patrol center field for the Cubs. The former football and baseball star at Villanova University split time between A-Peoria and Daytona in 2011 and was added to the Chicago Cubs 40-man roster this off-season. Szczur is one of seven returning Cubs that were on the championship roster a season ago (Frank Del Valle, Eduardo Figueroa, Casey Harman, Matt Loosen, Chad Noble, Greg Rohan).
Within the organization, Daytona welcomes four standout players from the 2011 Peoria Chiefs squad: LHP Eric Jokisch, INF Richard Jones, Kirk and RHP Larry Suarez. Jokisch struck out 103 opponents over 134 innings of work and boasted a 9-3 record along with his 2.96 ERA in 28 appearances (14 starts). Kirk tossed a nine inning no-hitter on the fourth of July at home against the Clinton LumberKings. He also maintained a 4:1 strike out-to-walk ratio throughout the season. Suarez, who split time between Peoria, Daytona and AA-Tennessee, started the season with a team-high 16-inning scoreless streak before he was promoted to Daytona. Jones hit .309 over his 472 at-bats, led the Midwest League with 98 RBIs (third best in team history), was second in the league with 24 home runs and tied for second in the league with 36 doubles.

19-year-old INF Ronald Torreyes, who was acquired from Cincinnati with Travis Wood and Dave Sappelt for Sean Marshall in December of '11, was second in the Midwest League with a .356 batting average over his 278 at-bats, stole 12 bases and struck out just 19 times in 306 plate appearances. The Libertador, VE native will not turn 20 until September 2nd and is the youngest player on the Cubs roster.
Six players on the roster have experience beyond Advanced-A ball. RHP Brian Schlitter, who underwent Tommy John surgery in 2011, pitched in seven games for the Chicago Cubs in 2010. RHP Ty'relle Harris, who was acquired as a part of the 2010 Derrek Lee trade from Atlanta, played in AAA-Iowa and Tennessee last season. Jokisch, Loosen, OF Nelson Perez and Suarez were each on the Tennessee Smokies roster at some point during the 2011 season.

Eduardo Figueroa, who was the first player promoted to the Daytona Cubs last season, returns as one of the most consistent arms out of the bullpen. The 6'1" 185-pound right-hander boasted a 2.42 ERA over 70.2 innings of work, and held opponents under a .250 batting average for the season. LHP Frank Del Valle, who made only two appearances (both starts) for Daytona last season, shut down the St. Lucie Mets in game two of the Championship Series. He tossed six shutout innings of two-hit baseball and struck out eight while only walking one. The 5'11" 190-pounder from La Habana, CU features a fastball in the mid-90s and an above-average breaking ball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 02, 2012, 03:39:39 pm
Have we ever had a prospect on which the reports differed so greatly.

He throws a 98 mph fastball.

He throws 88 - 89 tops.

He throws a mid 90s fastball.

In a way, I want to see Del Valle just to see which one is right.

I an betting on a 93 top with a 88 - 89 average fastball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 02, 2012, 04:01:04 pm
I've seen Del Valle, and he's mostly in the 87-91 range.  Mid 90's way overstates it.

That international report from BA recently also backs that up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 02, 2012, 04:02:32 pm
Good to see Simpson starting out in Daytona.  Hopefully it's because he's earned a spot there and not because they want him pitching in the warm weather. 

Maybe he's finally 100% healthy and we get to see what we really have in him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on April 02, 2012, 04:16:07 pm
JR, I've seen reports elsewhere that Simpson's been assigned to EST, and he's still throwing in the 80's.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 02, 2012, 04:20:27 pm
JR, I've seen reports elsewhere that Simpson's been assigned to EST, and he's still throwing in the 80's.

Thanks Cubsin.  That's no good. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 02, 2012, 04:20:42 pm
Hopefully Jason McLeod is taking over our drafting this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 02, 2012, 04:56:06 pm
Have we ever had a prospect on which the reports differed so greatly.

He throws a 98 mph fastball.

He throws 88 - 89 tops.

He throws a mid 90s fastball.

The 98 could easily have been a dyslexic typo when they intended 89.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 02, 2012, 04:59:48 pm
Hopefully Jason McLeod is taking over our drafting this year.

Considering the prior posts, that would seem to be in response to Simpson's slow progress.  Isn't Simpson the one who was ill and lost a full season as a result?

Is that the sort of thing McLeod has some ability to avoid with his draft picks?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 02, 2012, 06:33:00 pm
Have we ever had a prospect on which the reports differed so greatly.

He throws a 98 mph fastball.

He throws 88 - 89 tops.

He throws a mid 90s fastball.

In a way, I want to see Del Valle just to see which one is right.

I an betting on a 93 top with a 88 - 89 average fastball.

He never threw 98.  There was a report about lights being out in the scoreboard and that it was actually 88.

The Chief's play-by-play guy posts at NSBB and he said that Del Valle tops out around 94 at best.

Quote
He is 88-92. Our scoreboard lights were out on the bottom left hand corner Friday night making the 8 in 88 look like a 9 and it got tweeted out. An honest mistake by someone who had never been to our stadium before and didn't know that the lights on the radar gun are broken. Fastest I have heard he has legitimately hit this season is 93-4. That said he was very impressive in his short time with the Chiefs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 02, 2012, 07:35:47 pm
The 98 could easily have been a dyslexic typo when they intended 89.

The report came from the radio announcer who was talking about how fast Del Valle was pitching.  I suppose he could have been dyslexic as he read the scoreboard readout.  It could also be that the gun was bad that game.s  But the point is that the 98 is out there, being reported by people that probably do not know the source.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 03, 2012, 12:26:41 am
Piece on Daytona's roster. Says they could tweak the roster but Simpson is still listed as being on it.

http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2012/04/03/d-cubs-roster-sports-talented-vets-newcomers.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on April 03, 2012, 06:33:11 am
The Smokies (AA) have an exhibition game tonight against Walters State Community College from here in East Tn, they are currently #2 in the national rankings of Division 1 JR Colleges....Should be interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsfan2011 on April 03, 2012, 10:31:18 am
Does anyone know who will be the starting pitcher Thursday night for Iowa?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 03, 2012, 03:42:19 pm
Smokies roster:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_ros&cid=553&stn=true&sid=t553


Quite weak outside of some pitchers to watch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 03, 2012, 03:58:31 pm
Daytona's full roster:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_ros&cid=450&stn=true&sid=t450
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 03, 2012, 03:59:52 pm
Iowa's roster:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_ros&cid=451&stn=true&sid=t451
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 03, 2012, 04:36:41 pm
Justin Bour and Rebel Ridling both on the Smokies roster.  I don't think either of them can play any other position than first base.  Jones is in Daytona, so it doesn't make much sense to send bour down there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 03, 2012, 04:38:09 pm
Still short a few guys in Iowa, no?

Any scuttlebutt on how Wells took the demotion?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 03, 2012, 06:08:07 pm
He lost his head, grabbed a gun, and shot Epstein, Hoyer and McLeod.

Two pieces of good news, though.

The Cubs have rehired Hendry to replace them.

The Red Sox are going to return Carpenter's bone spur.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 03, 2012, 06:47:14 pm
The Smokies (AA) have an exhibition game tonight against Walters State Community College from here in East Tn, they are currently #2 in the national rankings of Division 1 JR Colleges....Should be interesting.
Rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on April 03, 2012, 07:12:39 pm
Sure was....Rained most of the afternoon and came a monsoon during the 1st. Not surprising.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 03, 2012, 11:30:39 pm
Darkhorse prospect Michael Jensen is Peoria's opening day starter. P.J. Francescon and Jose Rosario are 2-3. Ben Wells starts game 4 with Kyler Burke piggybacking.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 03, 2012, 11:35:40 pm
A pretty extensive piece on Dae Eun Rhee:


Quote
"The first year Rhee struggled coming off Tommy John (surgery), and last year he was so-so at the beginning but very good by the end of the year,'' Bailey said. "His arm strength is better, but when he was hurt, he got a better feel for his off-speed stuff. His curve was a lollipop; he probably didn't have the confidence to really snap it like you need to. I'm sure he had doubts.

"Now, he's throwing a really crisp breaking ball.''

...

Bailey said Rhee's comeback, like others who have gone Tommy John surgery, was a delicate one at times.

"I think if guys are younger, it can take a little longer to get over it mentally,'' he said. "If you've played in the Major Leagues, been a pro for a while, it generally shortens that part of the process.''



http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2012/apr/03/short-night-for-smokies-dae-eun-rhee/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 03, 2012, 11:40:16 pm
Article on Szczur:

http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2012/04/04/champion-center-fielder-returns-to-daytona-cubs.html

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 04, 2012, 10:26:32 am
ArizonaPhil

Expect Frankie de la Cruz to get outrighted to Iowa (which he can refuse) and both Marcos Mateo AND Gerardo Concepcion to be placed on the 60-day DL to open up three more slots on the Cubs MLB 40-man roster.

It would not cost the Cubs any extra payroll to put Concepcion on the MLB 60-day DL because he already has a contract with a set salary, and this would allow him to spend a month working his way into shape at Extended Spring Training followed by a 30-day minor league "rehab" assignment at Daytona. By that time, the Cubs should have another opening on their 40-man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 04, 2012, 04:42:02 pm
Are any of the Cubs minor league teams on the internet tonight, either video or audio (free).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 04, 2012, 07:05:08 pm
Are any of the Cubs minor league teams on the internet tonight, either video or audio (free).

None of the minor league teams begin their seasons until tomorrow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 04, 2012, 07:51:51 pm
So the answer is no?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 04, 2012, 10:41:14 pm
For the person who wanted to know who was pitching for Iowa Thursday the answer is Randy Wells.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 05, 2012, 12:44:37 pm
Concepcion has been moved from Extended Spring Training to the Daytona roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 05, 2012, 02:44:32 pm
That's quite promising.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 05, 2012, 08:07:28 pm
Michael Jensen with no runs through 5 innings.  One walk and two strike outs.  Announcer has said that he is "fast" but if he gave any radar readings, I missed them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on April 05, 2012, 08:59:21 pm
Nick Struck is up to 10ks through 6 innings for the Smokies.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 05, 2012, 09:27:15 pm
Jackson: 2-4, RBI, SB, BB, 2 k

Rizzo: 2-4, RBI, SB, K

Vitters: 1-3, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_05_rreaaa_iowaaa_1


Szczur: 1-5, RBI, K

Torreyes: 2-5


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_05_dbcafa_breafa_1


Jensen: 5-2-0-0-1-2, 2 HB

Hernandez: 1-4, SF, RBI

DeVoss: 1-5, RBI, 3 K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_05_peoafx_belafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on April 05, 2012, 09:52:56 pm
Thanks, Chris.  I always appreciate the highlights.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 05, 2012, 09:57:52 pm
Struck: 6-4-1-1-1-10

Ha: 2-5, 2B, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_05_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 05, 2012, 09:58:43 pm
No problem, grrrrrlacher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 05, 2012, 10:04:26 pm
Borderline interesting that Rafael Lopez is hitting 3rd for Peoria, ahead of the likes of Hoilman, Golden, and Easterling.

Granted he's a touch old for Peoria, but catchers with hitting ability are still nice guys to have.  They also said Lopez had some power potential when he was drafted.

Possible sleeper catcher prospect?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 06, 2012, 05:05:54 am
Junior lake out a month with a back injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 06, 2012, 08:10:59 am
Junior lake out a month with a back injury.

Ah, yes, reality starts to set in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 06, 2012, 09:37:46 am
Ugh, this is pretty painful to read.  This comes from a story about the scout who discovered Rays uber prospect Matt Moore . . .

During the draft, the Cubs inquired of Moore whether he'd be willing to sign in the eighth round. Because of the relationship Powell had built with the Moores, the family tipped him off and Tampa Bay grabbed Moore with the first choice that round, two picks ahead of Chicago. He signed for $115,000.

Instead of Matt Moore, the Cubs had to settle for Marquez Smith in the 2007 8th round instead.  We took Ty Wright in Round 7. 

Painful.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 06, 2012, 09:42:40 am
Absolutely wish I had not read that.  That's probably all I'll ever think about again when watching Matt Moore pitch.  Just two spots away from taking him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 06, 2012, 09:57:07 am
Absolutely wish I had not read that.  That's probably all I'll ever think about again when watching Matt Moore pitch.  Just two spots away from taking him.

And that might well explain why the Cubs drafted Simpson when they did a couple of years ago, and a few rounds of where most thought they safely could still have taken him.  If the Cubs had any suggestion that another team would have taken him before the Cubs would have had another chance.....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 06, 2012, 10:58:50 am
COLLUSION!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 06, 2012, 11:02:12 am
Justin Bour with the system's first home run this year.

The year he was drafted, the reports were that he was extremely big, but didn't have big power to match.

When he got 4 home runs his first season, and only 12 in Peoria, a good hitters league, in his second year, I sort of wrote him off.  But 23 runs in the FSL the next year was reasonably impressive, since that is hardly a hitter's league.  And while a 20 % strikeout rate isn't really great, neither is it terrible for a power hitter.

One more interesting first base prospect to add to my watch list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 06, 2012, 09:34:25 pm
Szczur: 0-3, BB, K

Zych: 2-1-0-0-0-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_06_breafa_dbcafa_1


Francescon: 4-2/3 -2-1-1-0-9 , 2 HB

Cruz: 2/3 -2-4-4-2-0

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_06_peoafx_belafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 06, 2012, 09:36:02 pm
McNutt: 3-2/3 -2-0-0-3-3 , 3 WP

Antigua: 2-1/3 -2-0-0-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_06_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 06, 2012, 09:37:08 pm
McNutt just doesn't seem like he's all that great of a prospect to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 06, 2012, 09:50:07 pm
Jackson: 1-3, 3B, RBI, BB, K

Rizzo: 2-4, RBI, K, E

Vitters: 1-3, BB, K

Beliveau: 1-1-0-0-1-2



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_06_rreaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 06, 2012, 11:05:44 pm
Is that two consecutive games for Vitters to walk?

It will be interesting to see how long that lasts....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2012, 01:47:44 am
Quote
Zych's fastball was in the mid-90s and topped out at 97 mph in firing two scoreless innings for the first save of his pro career.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 07, 2012, 02:57:23 pm
Let me thank you in advance for all your hard work posting the minor league stuff, Chris.

Everyone appreciates it greatly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2012, 05:31:10 pm
Eh, it's not hard work, but thanks anyways.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2012, 05:32:54 pm


Rosario: 5-2/3 IP, 2 R

Golden: 1-5, K  (2-13 overall)

Hernandez: 0-4, SF, RBI  (2-12 overall)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_07_peoafx_belafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 07, 2012, 05:51:45 pm
Rosario was 12/2 G/A.  He had really strong G/A last year too.  I've just assumed he was raw/wild. 

But he must have been getting a lot of quick outs to get into the 6th inning on the tight week-one pitch-counts, especially with 3 walks eating up a bunch of those limited pitches. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 07, 2012, 06:18:55 pm
Simpson through 3 scoreless innings so far.  No mention of speed, but according to the broadcasters, his command has been pinpoint, both fast balls and breaking pitches.  Also seems to have an excellent pick off move.

Silva played LF in the first game, was the DH in yesterday's game, and is at 2B today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 07, 2012, 07:17:40 pm
Simpson allows a HR and two more singles in the 4th, and a single and then he makes an error in the 5th, but Harman bails him out.  4.1 innings, 1 HR, 5 hits, 2K/0BB.  The other pitcher, Jed Bradley, was a 1st round pick last year and has dominated Daytona through 6. 

An unconfirmed tweet for Simpson at 86 mph, according to an nsbb post. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 07, 2012, 07:19:28 pm
An unconfirmed tweet for Simpson at 86 mph, according to an nsbb post. 

Freakin' first round pick . . . ugh.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 07, 2012, 07:23:16 pm
It's time to cut our losses and release him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on April 07, 2012, 07:27:21 pm
It's time to cut our losses and release him.

Why? This was his first career start when he was even halfway healthy. Either his arm strength will come back, or it won't. If his control is good, that's half the battle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2012, 08:03:27 pm
Szczur: 0-4, K  (1-12 overall)

Simpson: 4-1/3 -5-1-1-0-2 , HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_07_dbcafa_breafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2012, 09:13:28 pm
Beeler: 5-6-1-1-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_07_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 07, 2012, 09:36:31 pm
Eh, it's not hard work, but thanks anyways.

Even if it is simply a perverse obsession, we still thank you for it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2012, 10:09:59 pm
Jackson: 2-4, 2B, BB, K

Rizzo: 1-4, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_07_rreaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on April 07, 2012, 11:55:59 pm
Am I being paranoid, or is there a real possibility that MLB and/or the U.S. government is encouraging the Dominican Republic to delay Jorge Soler's citizenship application while they investigate the Cubs' dealings with his agent?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 07, 2012, 11:59:59 pm
I suppose anything is possible, but I see no reason to suspect that it is so.  MLB has to proclaim him a free agent, and there is no reason why they can't do that after he is giving DR residency.  Ant the US government has no issue with what the Cubs might or might not have done.  Even if they could prove it was true, it wasn't illegal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on April 08, 2012, 12:36:37 am
 Obama is a White Sox fan. Weren't they in on Solar?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 08, 2012, 02:36:36 pm
Tennessee with no hits through the first 5 innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 08, 2012, 03:59:37 pm
Rhee pitched really well for 5 innings before a rough 6th.


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_08_tenaax_cngaax_1


Daytona and Peoria idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: UK on April 08, 2012, 04:14:50 pm
What I posted over at NSBB:

I was impressed by him, size-wise there's not too much projection but he hides the ball well and has good command a good feel for pitching.

He was 88-91 FB, 75-77 CB (1/7 break), and 80-82 CH. All but two strikeouts were on his breaking ball (the others were on his change), he did have swings and misses on FBs that were hittable, which is encouraging.

His curve projects to ML avg., he doesn't have a feel for his change-up but has good arm action.

Liria was 89-92, his slurve was 77-79, no change. Was on the side of the ball too much on the breaking ball, didn't show command or feel.

Cruz was 86-89, flashed a plus breaking ball but never consistent.

Shafer was 86-88 with a flat breaking ball (its not hard to jam Sano on Beloit and Shafer was able to not jam him and that ball is still going).

I'll get to the position guys once I stop throwing up.

The position guys, I'm a toolsy fan, for that I love Golden. Physical-wise he reminds me of Sosa with that shorter-stocky frame. He's a plus runner, didn't get a good read on arm strength, has plus bat speed, and can hit for power. He's very raw, didn't react well to breaking ball or jumps in the OF. He's going to be a boom or bust type.

Devoss has a gap to gap type of approach, likely won't hit power, good eye at the plate, plus runner.

There wasn't much there as far as position guys, Darvill has way too movement in his swing and needs to stronger, I see him ending in a utility type of role ala DJ Lemahieu.

Hernandez has tools, plus runner, good range and actions, didn't make any poor throws. If he's able to bulk up and work on his approach, he could a utility type of guy.

Hoilman has plus power and shorter swing for someone his size, there's some uppercut there. He's not athletic enough to play a corner OF spot. He's going to have to hit for power.

For me, the only one I seen with a legit shot of becoming an everyday regular from Fri night was Golden. There are a bunch of guys that project to marginal roles but Golden was the one if everything pans out that he could be a starter. He'll have to learn how to hit off-speed stuff though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 08, 2012, 04:21:06 pm
Anthony Rizzo hit a 3-run homer in the 8th to tie the game for Iowa and then Brett Jackson hit a game-winning triple in the 9th.

.

Jackson: 2-5, 3B, RBI, K

Rizzo: 1-4, HR, 3 RBI, K

Beliveau: 2-1-0-0-0-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_08_rreaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 08, 2012, 07:29:01 pm
Piece on Jackson and Rizzo:

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-keeping-their-eyes-on-Jackson-and-R?blockID=684806&feedID=10336
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 08, 2012, 07:31:39 pm
I was impressed by him, size-wise there's not too much projection but he hides the ball well and has good command a good feel for pitching.

He was 88-91 FB, 75-77 CB (1/7 break), and 80-82 CH. All but two strikeouts were on his breaking ball (the others were on his change), he did have swings and misses on FBs that were hittable, which is encouraging.


Who are you talking about here, UK?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 08, 2012, 09:04:58 pm
Piece on Jackson and Rizzo:

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-keeping-their-eyes-on-Jackson-and-R?blockID=684806&feedID=10336

“With potential impact young players, we always try to make decisions based on what’s best for their development,” Epstein said. “There’s a certain set of criteria for advancement that we have for each level of the minor-league system and that sort of checklist that goes into how those decisions are made.

“So I’d like to see players get a significant amount of time at Triple-A, usually a full calendar year, if possible, and certainly I’d like to see them check all the boxes (before) they’re advanced up here."


SOUNDS very good.  Hopefully they will actually do that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 08, 2012, 09:46:00 pm
Who are you talking about here, UK?

PJ Francescon, Peoria's starter who had the impressive 9K/0BB/2H/4.2IP start on Friday.  He's the late-round 23-year-old senior draft pick from little Trevecca Nazarene in Nashville.  Do you have any inside dope from Tennessee on him or the school? 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 08, 2012, 10:30:49 pm
PJ Francescon, Peoria's starter who had the impressive 9K/0BB/2H/4.2IP start on Friday.  He's the late-round 23-year-old senior draft pick from little Trevecca Nazarene in Nashville.  Do you have any inside dope from Tennessee on him or the school? 

Have no clue about him and didn't even know he went to Trevecca before you said anything about it. 

Trevecca's a really small Presbyterian school and I think is NAIA.  Nice campus but located right in the middle of a seedy part of town.  The projects on Murfreesboro Road are literally right across from campus.  When you think of Nashville area schools, it's honestly kind of an afterthought. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 08, 2012, 10:44:17 pm
Do you have any inside dope from Tennessee on him or the school? 

We have all seen Craig's dark side over the years he has posted here.  But I never thought he would call JR an "inside dope from Tennessee".

Granted, it IS accurate.  But still..........
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 09, 2012, 10:54:41 am
A little more on Francescon:  He graduated from Trevecca (I think it's Nazarene, not Presbyterian....), but he went two years to Middle Tennessee State.  Was 1-4 with a 9.11 ERA as a freshman, 6 starts/11 games, then according to BBcube he was 7.71 in only 2 games and 7 innings as a sophomore. 

I think then ended up moving over to Trevecca, and had a solid senior year. 

Probably some story there.  He got injured as a soph, perhaps even had surgrey, and wasn't till 2 years later that he resumed pitching?  Was just so bad that he got frustrated and gave up and quit; or his coach simply gave up and stopped pitching him?  Had a spiritual conversion, and for a time baseball didn't prioritize and he transferred to Christian college, but then after a while just for fun he got back on the team, with no pro aspirations?  But started pitching decent, and the Cubs surprisingly drafted him and he's kept getting better?  Who knows what the story is, but it's obviously not standard for pro pitchers. 


If he continues pitching pretty well, I imagine we'll get to hear what is probably a very interesting story sooner or later. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 09, 2012, 01:08:28 pm
There isn't a lot of difference between Nazarenes and Presbyterians, other that the fact that one is right and one is wrong.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 09, 2012, 01:13:47 pm
Depends on whether they're Missouri Synod or Wisconsin Synod Nazarenes.  Most Presbyterians are from Colorado.  At least the only ones I know.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 09, 2012, 01:16:11 pm
There IS no Wisconsin Synod Nazarenes.  At least not since all the hippies cut their hair.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 09, 2012, 08:38:00 pm
LaHair better hit, because Rizzo doesn't seem like he wants to stay at AAA.  3 hits and a walk tonight, including 2 HR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 09, 2012, 08:44:46 pm
Too bad we seem stuck with Soriano.  It'd be nice to move LaHair to LF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 09, 2012, 09:35:33 pm
Too bad we seem stuck with Soriano.  It'd be nice to move LaHair to LF.
They could bench Byrd, move DeJesus to center and play LaHair in right.

Of course, that outfield would let in five runs a night by itself but the offense would be better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 09, 2012, 09:40:02 pm
They could bench Byrd, move DeJesus to center and play LaHair in right.

Of course, that outfield would let in five runs a night by itself but the offense would be better.

Yeah that might make the infamous Henry Rodriguez, Sammy Sosa, and Glenallen Hill outfield look good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 09, 2012, 09:56:39 pm





Cates: 1-7-6-6-4-1

Szczur: 1-3, BB, SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_09_dunafa_dbcafa_1


Wells: 4-7-3-1-0-3

Burke: 4-2-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_09_qcsafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 09, 2012, 10:05:19 pm
Rizzo: 3-3, 2 HR, 3 RBI, BB

Vitters: 2-4, 2 RBI, K, E

Jackson: 1-5, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_09_albaaa_iowaaa_1


Cabrera: 1-2/3 -0-0-0-0-2  (3-2/3 IP ,1 H, 0 BB, 4 K's as a reliever)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_09_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 09, 2012, 10:28:12 pm
It's the PCL but, still, Rizzo has 29 homers and 110 RBI in 375 at-bats going back to last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 09, 2012, 10:42:35 pm
Rizzo's homers were both described as "monstrous" in an Albuquerque recap. Apparently, the Isotopes' outfielders didn't move on either one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 10, 2012, 12:12:29 am
Thanks Chris!  Great report re Rizzo!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 10, 2012, 03:02:53 pm
Rizzo: 0-4, BB, 2 K

Vitters: 2-3, RBI, BB

Beliveau: 1-1/3 -1-1-1-0-0, HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_10_albaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 10, 2012, 04:09:32 pm
Vitters has 3 walks and 7 singles thus far. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 10, 2012, 09:06:42 pm
Struck: 6-6-2-2-2-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_10_jacaax_tenaax_1


Kirk: 5-4-0-0-2-3

Torreyes: 2-4, 2B, BB, 2 E

Zych: 2-3-4-1-0-0


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_10_dunafa_dbcafa_1


Hernandez: 0-4, ( 2-21 )

Golden: 0-2, K, E  (3-19, 6 K, 0 BB )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_10_qcsafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 11, 2012, 12:04:08 am
Big EST stats from Tuesday via Az Phil.

Baez: 3-4, 2 3B, HR, 4 RBI

Vogelbach: 1-2, HR, 2 RBI, BB

Shoulders: 1-2, 2B, SF, RBI, K

Candelario: 2-3, 2B, BB


http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/04/10/baez-vogelbach-demolish-giants?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TCRfeed+%28The+Cub+Reporter%29
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on April 11, 2012, 06:42:01 am
Went to opening day at home for the Smokies last night and was disappointed in the effort in general from the team, not sure if it's the supposed youth we have or what but the effort is just not there. Struck started and pitched well and hard for a couple of innings but ran out of gas quick last night, he did top out at 96 according to the visiting team guns according to Cory Snyder who I had the pleasure of talking with most of the evening. Logan Watkins fielded a ball that he probably shouldn't have even gotten too (plus side) but then threw it into the stands (bad side). Michael Brenly got the start behind the plate and proceeded to allow I believe 5 pass balls with 3 of them leading to runs, his lack of hustle on them is what discouraged me he would just jog back to the ball while the Jackson runners where still moving up bases by the second. The only real bright spot I saw was Aducci as usual, just another solid guy who needs to be in AAA but there isn't room for him I guess. Overall I am very disappointed in what I saw.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on April 11, 2012, 07:37:08 am
I've never seen or heard Struck anywhere near 96...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: cwells52 on April 11, 2012, 09:12:14 am
I hadn't either but both guns had the same thing.....Not sure where it come from but he was consistently high all night.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 11, 2012, 02:44:15 pm
McNutt: 4-2-0-0-3-5

Antigua: 3-1/3 -3-1-1-1-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_11_jacaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 11, 2012, 09:08:42 pm
Jensen: 6-5-3-3-1-5  ( 5-1-0-0-1-4  after 1st inning )

Wang: 2-0-0-0-0-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_11_qcsafx_peoafx_1


Szczur: 0-2, 2 BB, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_11_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 11, 2012, 09:14:25 pm
Jackson: 0-4, BB, 2 K

Rizzo: 0-4, K

Vitters: 2-3, SF, 2 RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_11_albaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 11, 2012, 11:13:04 pm
Nice rebound for Jensen.  Gave up three straight singles, and 4 hits to first 5 hitters.  Then very clean after that, encouraging. 

What's the over/under for how many singles Vitters will hit before he gets an extra-base hit?  He's at 9 singles now.  Perhaps he can emerge as Barney without the defense or the hustle?  Heh heh.  I'm still optimistic that when all is said and done, he'll hit his fair share of HR's.

Jackson has always been a super streaky player, and for the moment he's in one of his slumps.  His K-rate is still under 40%. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 12, 2012, 10:41:36 am
Vitters has more walks than strike outs.

Pretty much what I expected.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on April 12, 2012, 12:26:49 pm
9-20, with 3 BB and 2 Ks

The pop will come...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 12, 2012, 12:29:34 pm
9-20, with 3 BB and 2 Ks

The pop will come...

Part of that whole opportunity, confidence sort of thing?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Santo4HofF on April 12, 2012, 12:34:05 pm
Ryan Braun could help him with the pop once he can afford the high dollar attornies
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on April 12, 2012, 01:43:39 pm
not worried about Vitters power just yet, but i am continued to be concerned with Sczur's lack of XB power...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 12, 2012, 02:05:04 pm
not worried about Vitters power just yet, but i am continued to be concerned with Sczur's lack of XB power...

One thing to remember is Szcuzr is playing in a really tough park and league for hitters.  I'd like to at least some doubles power and maybe 8-10 homers at least if he plays the full season in Daytona, but expecting him to slug over .500 in Daytona for instance is going to be a tough haul.  A slugging percentage in the .415 to .450 range for Szczur in Daytona I think would be quite acceptable and wouldn't raise too many red flags with me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 12, 2012, 02:15:47 pm
Vitters is two for four so far today, with his first extra base hit, a double.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 12, 2012, 03:43:00 pm
Rizzo: 3-4, RBI

Vitters: 2-4, 2B, RBI

Rusin: 7 IP, 2 R


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_12_albaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 12, 2012, 03:51:35 pm
Sczur is a lot like Samardzija.  He lost lots of baseball training time while playing football, so he is 2 to 3 years behind the guys who have been concentrating on baseball.  I think he'll come along.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 12, 2012, 04:02:29 pm
I think the same thing applies to Easterling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on April 12, 2012, 04:05:16 pm
...and Quincy Carter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 12, 2012, 04:05:52 pm
Carter just didn't stick around long enough
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 12, 2012, 05:37:40 pm
Nice to see Rizzo get some hits, and Vitters both keep getting hits and getting his first XBH. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 12, 2012, 09:12:04 pm
Simpson: 5-2/3 -7-3-3-1-1, HB, Balk

Szczur: 0-4, BB, K, SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_12_dbcafa_tbyafa_1


Beeler: 6-3-1-1-1-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_12_jacaax_tenaax_1


Hernandez: 0-4, 3 K

Golden: 1-4, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_12_peoafx_wisafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 13, 2012, 12:25:27 am
Az Phil recap from EST:

Quote
Cubs Player of the Game was Shawon Dunston Jr, who reached base three times on a triple, a single, and a walk, laid-down a picture perfect sacrifice bunt, and made an outstanding diving catch in LF for the first out in the bottom of the 8th after the Cubs had taken a 3-2 lead in the top of the frame.



Vogelbach: 1-3, 2 RBI, BB

Candelario: 1-4, 2 K


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 13, 2012, 06:43:35 am
Thanks, Chris.  I've always assumed that Dunston was a nice dancer but that hitting was beyond his scope.  (I think I read that he barely hit .300 even in HS...)  Would be fun if he actually emerged as a prospect.

I also found it interesting that Dunston was in LF and Zapata in CF.  We know that Dunston has good outfielding tools.  A stretch, but if they even consider putting Zapata in CF when he's on the same field with Dunston, perhaps that suggests that they perceive Zapata as having some pretty decent outfielding tools also. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 13, 2012, 10:46:26 am
From what I have read from ArizonaPhil, Zapata is a very good CF, taking good routes to the ball and has a quick first step.  He also has a RF arm.  The only knock I have heard on his defense is that his hands are not particularly soft, and he sometimes boots a ball coming to him on the ground.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 13, 2012, 12:33:27 pm
Thanks, Chris.  I've always assumed that Dunston was a nice dancer but that hitting was beyond his scope.  (I think I read that he barely hit .300 even in HS...)  Would be fun if he actually emerged as a prospect.

http://www.maxpreps.com/athletes/PBjPld4HjkmJt61SOljzgQ/baseball-spring-11/stats-shawon-dunston-jr.htm#batting

Last year he had 119 PA, hit .319, with a .420 OBP and .467 slg.  He had 1 HR, 3 3B and 3 2B, with 16 K and 13 walks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 13, 2012, 08:38:05 pm
Rizzo with another home run tonight.  Rhee had six pretty good innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 13, 2012, 08:51:36 pm
Rizzo actually has two more homers tonight.  Unless LaHair continues to be really good, it's going to be hard to keep him down.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 13, 2012, 08:53:13 pm
As both Rizzo and LaHair said, the ideal would be to have BOTH in the lineup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 13, 2012, 09:05:26 pm
Rizzo actually has two more homers tonight.  Unless LaHair continues to be really good, it's going to be hard to keep him down.

Considering Rizzo's problems when he was called up last year, I would be surprised if the Cubs called him up before the end of May regardless, and not even then unless he is hitting around .450 with an OPS of about 1.700.  I suspect they want him to have at least three full months in the minors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 13, 2012, 09:13:18 pm
As both Rizzo and LaHair said, the ideal would be to have BOTH in the lineup.

Yeah, but the only way you get them both in the lineup is to replace Soriano or DeJesus with LaHair.  DeJesus has been excellent so far, and Soriano has been good enough to keep his job given the money he's making.  I guess they could move DeJesus to center, but having Soriano and LaHair on the corners would probably make the outfield defense laughable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 13, 2012, 09:30:31 pm
I've heard that LaHair was okay out there.  I have never seen him, however.  Soriano has been playing well.  If they want to keep Rizzo down for 30+ days, the situation may sort itself out.  Injuries happen.  Slumps happen.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 13, 2012, 10:08:50 pm
Hernandez: 2-3, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, BB, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_13_peoafx_wisafx_1


Rhee: 6-1/3 -6-1-1-0-4

Ha: 1-1, 2B, 2 BB, HBP, PO


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_13_jacaax_tenaax_1



Szczur: 0-3, 2 BB, K, CS

Torreyes: 0-5  (5-29, 2 BB)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_13_dbcafa_tbyafa_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 13, 2012, 10:18:19 pm
Looked at the box score, and Torreyes played shortstop...so is he a shortstop now?  Does that mean they think a lot of him if they're moving him to a more difficult position?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 13, 2012, 10:19:46 pm
I've wondered about that too.  Not sure, but it does open up 2B for Silva.  He's been doing rather well there, at least hitting-wise. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 13, 2012, 10:22:22 pm
Jackson: 1-5, HR, RBI, 2 K

Rizzo: 2-3, 2 HR, 3 RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_13_iowaaa_rreaaa_1


According to someone who follows Round Rock's team, Rizzo's homers came on an 81 mph change and an 83 mph cutter, and both were crushed, particularly the second one.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 13, 2012, 10:25:23 pm
Sounds like we got a live one on our hands, boys.....

Quote
Javier Baez belted a three-run home run and Yasiel Balaguert stroked an RBI triple and scored on a Jair Bogaerts RBI single, as the Cubs plated five runs in the bottom of the 4th en route to a 5-1 victory over the Angels in Extended Spring Training action this morning at Fitch Park Field #3 in Mesa, AZ.

The Baez HR was not without controversy.

Baez stood at home plate for a couple of seconds after absolutely walloping the gopher ball 400+ feet and off the roof of a house on the north side of 8th Street (Baez did the exact same thing on Tuesday when he launched a three-run homer over the LF fence at Indian School Park in Scottsdale), at which point one of the Angel coaches yelled, “Run the bases!”

Baez initially took the “advice” and he did run the bases (albeit a bit of a “Cadillac” trot that probably further irritated the opposition), but upon reaching home plate Baez stopped and yelled back at the Angel bench, “I can do whatever the **** I want!”

Trey Martin and Gioskar Amaya (who were on base in front of Baez) and on-deck hitter Rock Shoulders pulled Baez back to the Cubs bench, avoiding a potential bench-clearing brawl on the field. (BTW, having a big dude like Rock Shoulders on the field might be the best deterrent to violence since Mutually Assured Destruction).

It was one of the only times I can remember something like this happening in an Extended Spring Training game. Sometimes players get upset, but this was more like what you see in the big leagues. I kind of expected Baez to get pulled out of the game and sent to the clubhouse to cool off, but he stayed in the game, and in fact he played all nine innings at shortstop.


http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/04/13/baez-can-do-whatever
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 13, 2012, 10:35:08 pm
Looked at the box score, and Torreyes played shortstop...so is he a shortstop now?  Does that mean they think a lot of him if they're moving him to a more difficult position?

The new regime places a lot of value on the ability to play several positions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 14, 2012, 07:37:42 am
The new regime places a lot of value on the ability to play several positions.

As did the former regime.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 14, 2012, 11:13:34 am
Many views of the old and the new regimes overlap, as they do with the views of many other teams.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 14, 2012, 03:50:01 pm
Wells: 5-2/3 -3-3-3-1-5 , 2 HB, 8-0 GO/FO  ( 4-2/3 -1-0-0-1-5  after 1st )

DeVoss: 2-5, HR, 3 RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_14_peoafx_wisafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 14, 2012, 07:31:47 pm
Burgess: 3-4, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, K, Assist

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_14_jacaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 14, 2012, 08:49:34 pm
Szczur: 0-3, BB, K  (.125)

Zych: 1-0-0-0-0-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_14_dbcafa_tbyafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 14, 2012, 09:53:59 pm
Wellington Castillo is off to a good start this season.  Threw out the only basestealer tonight thus far, 3-3, another walk. 

I'm very glad that he's playing regularly, getting better, and having the opportunity to impress in Iowa, rather than playing once a week behind Soto.  Much better chance to prove himself as a valuable guy and a guy who could be a starter this way. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 14, 2012, 10:03:50 pm
Jackson: 2-5, 2B, HR, RBI, K

Rizzo: 1-4, 2B, 2 GIDP

Vitters: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_14_iowaaa_rreaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 15, 2012, 12:55:15 am
Whitenack strong in his return from surgery; Concepcion not so strong.


Vogelbach: 1-3, 2B, BB, K

Candelario: 1-3, 2B

Whitenack: 2-1-0-0-0-3

Concepcion: 3-1/3 -6-5-5-3-5


http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/04/14/rough-cubs-cuban-connection-papago-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 15, 2012, 02:20:41 pm
Looks like Oliver Zapata was brought up to Peoria to replace Golden.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 15, 2012, 03:40:25 pm
Ruby Silva has more walks in 9 games at Daytona this month than he had in 29 games there last season. 

He was 21K/3BB at Daytona last year, and 95K/16BB/495 AB overall.  He's 6K/4BB thus far.  I'd kind of written him off last year, since corner OFers with no power and no IsoD don't go far.  I don't know if his 2B defense can be big-league, or at least big-league asset.  But if he could play good 2B defense and get a decent IsoD, then he could be useful even without many HR's.  Hopefully the walks will continue, although I suppose he's red hot right now and seeing the ball well, and the same vision that's producing the .452 average is also helping with the walks.  Perhaps when he settles back towards .280 average, his walks will decline accordingly. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 15, 2012, 04:47:03 pm
Szczur: 1-5, SB  ( 5-37 overall )

Kirk: 7 IP, 1 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_15_dbcafa_dunafa_1


DeVoss: 2-5, 3B, 2 RBI, BB

Zapata: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI, BB, K, Assist


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_15_peoafx_wisafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 15, 2012, 05:58:33 pm
Rizzo: 3-7

Jackson: 1-5, 2 BB, 3 K

Campana hit the first true home run of his career.


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_15_iowaaa_rreaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 15, 2012, 06:02:35 pm
So far Maine is setting himself up nicely for a possible call up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 15, 2012, 06:14:49 pm

Campana hit the first true home run of his career.

He's juicing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 15, 2012, 06:48:22 pm
Randy Wells won't be replacing Paul Maholm if he keeps pitching like that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 15, 2012, 07:04:26 pm
Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_15_tenaax_hunaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 15, 2012, 09:18:03 pm
Ruby Silva has more walks in 9 games at Daytona this month than he had in 29 games there last season. 

He was 21K/3BB at Daytona last year, and 95K/16BB/495 AB overall.  He's 6K/4BB thus far.  I'd kind of written him off last year, since corner OFers with no power and no IsoD don't go far.  I don't know if his 2B defense can be big-league, or at least big-league asset.  But if he could play good 2B defense and get a decent IsoD, then he could be useful even without many HR's.  Hopefully the walks will continue, although I suppose he's red hot right now and seeing the ball well, and the same vision that's producing the .452 average is also helping with the walks.  Perhaps when he settles back towards .280 average, his walks will decline accordingly. 

Logan Watkins is also off to a good OBP start.  .317 average, with 8K/6BB/41AB.  He hit .261 at Peoria, .281 at Daytona.  If he were to hit .317 with a good walk rate, he could be a good OBP guy.  Good 2B defense, I assume. 

hard to hit .300 when you whiff so much and get no HR's, though. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 16, 2012, 08:08:05 pm
Szczur: 4-5

Zych: 1-2-2-2-1-1


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_16_dbcafa_dunafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 16, 2012, 08:13:04 pm
Hopefully that is the start of something for Szczur and he has worked something out.  Even after a 4-5 game, this early in the season, it only got his avg up to .214.  He has been stinking something fierce.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 16, 2012, 08:53:55 pm
It's early.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 16, 2012, 09:19:45 pm
Jensen: 6-3-1-1-2-5 , 9-3 GO/FO

Zapata: 1-2, HR, RBI, 2 BB, CS


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_16_cedafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 16, 2012, 09:44:34 pm
McNutt: 4-4-1-1-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_16_tenaax_hunaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 16, 2012, 10:20:38 pm
Jackson: 1-3, 2B, SB, 2 BB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_16_iowaaa_rreaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 16, 2012, 10:24:46 pm
Jensen is starting to look interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 16, 2012, 10:25:25 pm
Jackson is off to a pretty good start...but he still hasn't gone a game without a strikeout yet this year.  It's a real concern...he really needs to make more contact.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 17, 2012, 12:13:33 am
McNutt: 4-4-1-1-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_16_tenaax_hunaax_1 (http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_16_tenaax_hunaax_1)
Huntsville pitcher Tyler Thornburg had a perfect game until one out in the eighth.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2012, 12:34:52 am
Hopefully, Javier Baez grows out of his alleged douchiness because the kid is showing signs of being a monster talent offensively. He hit for the cycle Monday as AzPhil explains:


Quote
Javier Baez hit for the cycle and drove-in all five Cub runs with a two-run triple and a three-run home run, but the Angels rallied for five runs in the middle-three innings to edge the Cubs 6-5, in Cactus League Extended Spring Training action this morning at Diablo Park Field #3 in Tempe, AZ.

In addition to his big day at the plate, Baez also stole a base (3rd base following his double) and made the defensive Play of the Day, going deep into the hole to backhand a grounder headed for LF, and then nailing the out with a leap and an on-the-money throw to 1st.

In his first four Extended Spring Training games, Baez is 9-15 with three three-run home runs, three triples, two doubles, and a single, and in his last game prior to the start of Extended Spring Training, Baez clubbed a two-run HR off Paul Maholm in an intrasquad game at Fitch Park

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2012, 12:44:34 am
More on Baez and some of the other players currently in Arizona:

Quote
It's unclear where Baez will start the season.

"Right now, I'm working on my offense," said Baez, the club's first-round selection in the 2011 First-Year Player Draft, No. 9 overall. "We are working to make my swing smoother and put me in a position that gives me more control. It's not just about swinging as hard as you can."



http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120416&content_id=28827968&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc&tcid=tw_article_28827968
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 17, 2012, 12:56:00 am
Those are some crazy xbh numbers. Holy crap.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2012, 12:59:21 am
Phil also says that a couple of Baez' non-homers have been near homers. He said one of Baez' doubles today hit a 422 ft sign in center that is in play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2012, 06:52:01 am
Castillo has a bunch of walks thus far.  He's never been discussed in the same ballpark as Jackson as a prospect, but whereas Jackson has shown no indication of any improvement on his k-rates over the years, Castillo seems like he's been improving over the last several years on aspects that are weak.  In 2008 and 2009, he walked 18 and 15 times in about 320 AB each season. 

Now these last two years it's improved somewhat to 19/239 and 29/275, and now he's off to a 6BB/23AB start.  Obviously he's seeing the ball well right now, and when you do it's easier to stay patient, so his walk-rate is no more likely to be sustainable than his .478 average, his .800+ slugging, or his 1.432 OPS.  But it's fun to see. 

Szczur has 8 walks/42 AB, and with his 4-hit game he's raised his OBP to .354.  Although with hits of any kind very rare, and those all singles, his slugging is .214.  But the uncharacteristic walk rate suggests he may be trying to be a lot more patient, and perhaps in time he'll settle into a better equilibrium. 

Probably just not much of a prospect, though.  Whatever tools he may seem to have, they all seem to be somewhat short.  Not enough power for HR's, not enough speed to steal, not enough contact to really hit for average. 

Interesting how Jackson the top prospect has shown little sign of improvement, his profile really hasn't changed any since A-ball.  But Castillo has shown
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 17, 2012, 07:03:52 am
Hopefully, Javier Baez grows out of his alleged douchiness because the kid is showing signs of being a monster talent offensively. He hit for the cycle Monday as AzPhil explains:

What's the alleged douchiness about?  Granted, I don't think he was ever a guy who was considered to have plus makeup, but anything new?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 17, 2012, 07:53:47 am
What's the alleged douchiness about?  Granted, I don't think he was ever a guy who was considered to have plus makeup, but anything new?

You beat me to it.  I was going to ask the same question.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 17, 2012, 08:41:16 am
Courtesy of Bleacher Nation, here's a Baseball Prospectus site that tracks each MLB team's top prospects.  It is supposed to be updated daily.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/prospects/stats/top_11/index.php?year=2012&org=chn (http://www.baseballprospectus.com/prospects/stats/top_11/index.php?year=2012&org=chn)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 17, 2012, 08:57:16 am
The only problem with that Baseball Prospectus link is that it's based on their Cubs top 11 prospects list which came out in November...so there's no Rizzo, and guys like LaMahieu and Flaherty are still on there.  Seems like they could update that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 17, 2012, 08:58:38 am
Baez - in a game toward the end of last week, Javier hit a monster HR and stood and watched it soar before finally taking off and sauntering around the bases.  A coach on the other team chided him to run around the bases and, upon touching home plate, Baez looked toward the dugout and said, "I can do any f____ thing I want!"   

Not ideal, yet the immaturity can be understood.  Dustin P. grew up in Northern California and was considered by some to be WAY over-the-top cocky as he grew up in baseball.  Now, he's the leader of the clubhouse in Boston.    Hopefully, Baez will mature in a Pedroia sort of way...put that natural swagger to good use!

Szczur - Craig, I think it's WAY too early to draw conclusions about this lad, particularly since he hasn't gone through one full season of professional baseball yet.  His development may be like that of Sharky, particularly since his background is rather similar.  Szczur may well be 26 or 27 when it finally comes together, but the scouts sure seem to agree that he has the athleticism and make-up to succeed.   I think your point is probably right about incorporating patience in his plate approach will likely mess with him for a bit; however, it should help him tremendously in the long run.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 17, 2012, 09:04:30 am
I'm not sure what the relevance is of Pedroia's growing up in Northern California.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 17, 2012, 09:35:35 am
Thanks ben.  You never know about 18-19 year old kids, but something tells me Baez won't ever be the most popular player personality wise in Cub history if he makes it big.  I imagine the comparisons to Gary Sheffield go beyond more than just his bat.  He'll probably be more of along the lines of Sheffield, Sammy, or Bonds personality wise than Pedroia.

Of course, guys who hit like Sheffield, Sammy, and Bonds still win you a lot of games even if they aren't the most pleasant people to hang around, so if he hits like that and doesn't ever grow up, I imagine we'll figure out how to deal with a less than ideal personality and all the maintenance that will go along with it.   

I can't really base that on more than just gut feeling at this point, though.  He had the incident at that high school all-star game where he was kicked out, and at least for me, I still think it's odd that a guy who graduated from a private Florida high school needs an interpreter to conduct newspaper interviews.  It's not too surprising to me to read an account like ben just described.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 17, 2012, 09:38:09 am
I'm not sure what the relevance is of Pedroia's growing up in Northern California.

Anyone growing up in Northern California becomes a worthless human being.  Ask Mrs. CurtOne.  Ask Mrs. Playtwo.  Nuff said.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2012, 10:00:25 am
Many great hitters have lousy personalities.  If Baez is a jerk but can really hit, we'll probably accept that. 



 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 17, 2012, 10:12:01 am
Not everyone is Stan Musial or Tony Gwynn.  Wasn't Alex Johnson a tool?  Dick Allen?  Before Milton Bradley there was another really good hitter that went off the tracks...I'm sure someone will remember.  Also played for Cleveland and Baltimore, I think.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 17, 2012, 10:18:09 am
Albert Belle
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on April 17, 2012, 10:23:48 am
Carlos Zambrano?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 17, 2012, 10:39:43 am
Wasn't Alex Johnson a tool?

I didn't know who that was, so I went to look him up.  Sounds like he was pretty much the Milton Bradley of the 60's and 70's. 

http://sabr.org/bioproj/person/2ad87d7d (http://sabr.org/bioproj/person/2ad87d7d)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 17, 2012, 10:48:19 am
Clark wins again.  Yes.  Albert Belle.

Alex Johnson, Albert Belle, Milton Bradley.  Same guy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 17, 2012, 10:58:05 am
One thing, though, there's a big difference between bad personalities like Bradley and Alex Johnson who don't try hard and never got the most out of their abilities and bad personalities like Bonds and Sosa who still had the determination to be great players. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2012, 11:35:27 am
One thing, though, there's a big difference between bad personalities like Bradley and Alex Johnson who don't try hard and never got the most out of their abilities and bad personalities like Bonds and Sosa who still had the determination to be great players. 

That's a huge distinction.  Some bad personality can really get in the way of success, some can make totally no difference, and I think in some cases it can even help. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 17, 2012, 12:21:46 pm
It didn't help me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2012, 02:39:45 pm
Albert Belle was mostly snarly with the media. I don't recall him being a problem with teammates or the other team. Well, he did level Fernando Vina but that's a plus in my book.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 17, 2012, 04:39:21 pm
Of course, guys who hit like Sheffield, Sammy, and Bonds still win you a lot of games even if they aren't the most pleasant people to hang around, so if he hits like that and doesn't ever grow up, I imagine we'll figure out how to deal with a less than ideal personality and all the maintenance that will go along with it.

Bonds, Sosa and Sheffield were all tremendous hitters, generally far superior to anyone a time might be able to replace any of them with.  The kind of talent leading to lots of additional wins for a team.

And how many championships did the three of them contribute to with playing careers that totaled 62 years between them?

One.  One, when random chance would have had two.

Certainly it would be hard for a GM trying to win a championship to look at a player like any of them and pass on the opportunity of adding them to, or keeping them on, the roster.

But perhaps they should.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 17, 2012, 04:52:46 pm
Baez - in a game toward the end of last week, Javier hit a monster HR and stood and watched it soar before finally taking off and sauntering around the bases.  A coach on the other team chided him to run around the bases and, upon touching home plate, Baez looked toward the dugout and said, "I can do any f____ thing I want!"

Not sure that qualifies as "douchieness," whatever that might be, but it is something the Theocracy will want to watch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2012, 06:23:51 pm
Yes, I would say that and his alleged behavior in highschool qualify as douchiness.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 17, 2012, 07:06:22 pm
What behavior in HS?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 17, 2012, 07:17:51 pm
Hayden Simpson got destroyed tonight.  2.2 innings, 6 hits, 4 walks, 6 earned runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 17, 2012, 07:20:40 pm
That's one of his better outings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2012, 07:25:09 pm
Quote
What behavior in HS?

Prior to the draft, it was said that scouts were bothered by Baez' emotional outbursts and off-field demeanor. I can't recall specifics but he did something to get that label.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 17, 2012, 09:10:23 pm
He might have a rather extended stay in Arizona....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 17, 2012, 09:33:15 pm
That's one of his better outings.

Nice!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 17, 2012, 09:36:38 pm
By the way, I hope Javier Baez is the most hated player in baseball during his peak years.

I don't mind a little edge to a player as long as he produces and is a good teammate.

Reggie Jackson, Craig Biggio and Rickey Henderson are some "jerks" that come to mind that I would've loved to see play at Wrigley.

As long as Baez is good, his attitude shouldn't be a problem.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2012, 09:42:39 pm
Zapata: 3-4, K, SB, Assist


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_17_cedafx_peoafx_1


Simpson: 2-2/3 -6-6-6-4-0 , HR, WP, Balk

Szczur: 0-5, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_17_dbcafa_dunafa_1


Tenn rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2012, 09:44:48 pm
I don't remember Biggio having any reputation. Anyway, Baez sounds more like the kind who could be disciplined for selfishness. I don't think we want that. One year of Milton Bradley was enough.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 17, 2012, 09:52:04 pm
Isn't Baez the kid with the mlb logo tattooed on the back of his neck? 

How many all-stars have anything like that?  At the least, he's got squat for humility, and I make no apology for wanting to root for a person and his performance.  I dislike him already.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 17, 2012, 10:03:07 pm
Hayden Simpson got destroyed tonight.  2.2 innings, 6 hits, 4 walks, 6 earned runs.

Man what an awful first round pick.  Just brutal. 

Honestly, Simpson would be looking like an awful pick even if he was taken with a 3rd or 4th round pick, like most teams had him pegged.

He looks like he's getting into Ty Griffin, Earl Cunningham, Mark Pawelek territory of historically bad first rounders.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 17, 2012, 10:06:31 pm
BTW do we know if McLeod is taking over the draft yet or not?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 17, 2012, 10:41:57 pm
McLeod will be taking over the draft...whether that's been announced or not.
He's Theo and Jed's guy and they know the draft is critical to their plan!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2012, 11:16:06 pm
Jackson: 1-5, 3B, 2 K

Rizzo: 2-4, K, E



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_17_iowaaa_albaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 18, 2012, 12:10:05 am
I don't remember Biggio having any reputation. Anyway, Baez sounds more like the kind who could be disciplined for selfishness. I don't think we want. One year of Milton Bradley was enough.
One memory I have of Craig Biggio is from the Astros playing at Wrigley in the first game after 9/11.   When the pre-game ceremony was over, all the players went back to the dugouts - except for Biggio who went around and shook hands with all of the firefighters.

Then first base coach Billy Williams handed Sammy a flag to carry around the bases.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 18, 2012, 05:19:15 am
As far as I can tell, Brett Jackson is a lower powered Carlos Pena.  Good/great D, and more speed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 18, 2012, 07:11:12 am
That may be a good comp.  Probably depends a lot on how much "lower powered" he is.  Pena without a lot of HR's wouldn't have maintained a job as a starter for a lot of years.  I suppose also the K-rate factors.  Pena was able to get by despite all his K's.  But if his K-rate had been another step worse, maybe that would have bumped him over the edge. 

Jackson has a 20K/2HR ratio, so when you're you're hitting less than .100 on the balls not in play, and those comprise over 40% of your AB's, average isn't super great. 

Pena's K/HR ratios never approached 10/1, at least not while in the majors.  And of course he didn't K as much in the minors as he did in the majors, so he never put up any minor-league seasons close to what Jackson is doing right now. 

Obviously it's only been two weeks, and players who end up being good routinely go through 2-week slumps.  But Jackson's going to need to do better.  Unfortunately the big hole in his bat that leads to so many K's doesn't appear to have shown any sign of getting smaller over the years, and it's perhaps been more exposed in AAA than it was at lower levels.  20K/52AB this spring, 64K/185AB last year, so combined that's 84K/237 AB.   That's better than 35% K rate combined, so it's not like this April is all that much out of line with last season. 

Would be nice at some point to see some sustained improvement of some kind from Jackson, but the K-issue seems to have been relatively consistent and getting worse at higher level.  Hopefully as a big-leaguer he'll have a lot of 26-48 HR seasons like Pena has had to float things. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on April 18, 2012, 09:58:06 am
Pena BTW has been raking at Tampa Bay.  Good on him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 18, 2012, 10:06:14 am
Agreed re Jackson, Craig.   I'm still scratching my head re Sveum's gushing over Jackson as the best rookie he's seen in 10 years...not that he can't turn into a terrific player...just hard to project that now with all the Ks.

Based on all known at this point, I certainly don't get Jackson as our #1 prospect over Rizzo. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 18, 2012, 10:22:14 am
Relative to position, perhaps?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 18, 2012, 11:09:33 am
Why does everyone assume Jackson is going to be a .200 hitter like Pena when he's hit for average at every level?  I'm not thrilled about the Ks, but he hits the ball square when he hits it.  Power, speed, defense and a ton of walks - I'll live with the Ks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 18, 2012, 11:46:49 am
It's simple math.  If a guy is striking out in 30% of his plate appearances, balls just aren't going to fall in often enough to result in a good batting average.  Jackson is hitting for high averages in the minors because he has a BABIP that just isn't sustainable against the better competition in the majors.  His career minor league BABIP is somewhere in the .375 range (can't find the exact number).  Only three players in history with at least 3,000 PA have had a BABIP of .375 or higher--Tom McCreery, Ty Cobb, and Willie Keeler--and all three of them were out of the game by 1930.  His current hitting just isn't sustainable long term in the majors.

If Jackson is able to post a BABIP of .338 in the majors--that's top 50 all time (minimum 3,000 PA), the same as guys like Manny Ramirez and Lou Brock--his overall BA is going to drop by what, 30-40 points?  That already has him in the .260 range, and that's a pretty optimistic projection of his abilities.  He can still be a pretty good regular like that, but he'll never be a star.

And if he's more of an average (or even slightly above) BABIP guy (say .300-.310 range), he's just not that good a player with a 30% strikeout rate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 18, 2012, 11:53:46 am
One for reference, Ryan Howard has a career 31% strikeout rate and a career .275 batting average.  Jackson may not have Howard's power, but he has much better speed.

Hitting for a respectable enough average I think is doable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 18, 2012, 12:27:51 pm
Howard's 31% strikeout rate is based on AB; if you base it on PA, it's 27%.  At AAA, Jackson has struck out in 35% of his ABs and 30% of his PA.  He actually strikes out more at AAA than Howard does in MLB.

I like Jackson and think he'll be at least a decent regular for several years.  But if he can't reduce his strikeouts, he's just not going to be able to be much more than a .250 hitter.  With his walks and power, that still probably makes him something like a .250/.340/.425 guy, which is very valuable in CF.  But he could be an All Star type if he could just get his strikeout rate down a little.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 18, 2012, 01:20:58 pm
I think there is a wide gap in the way fans who adhere to an intensely stats orientation and the way that the Theo/Jed et al Cubs leadership assess players.  They keep saying that they rely heavily on scouting (not just physical tools, but makeup etc) and the fact that they mean it is going to lead to a lot of scratching of heads by more purely stats oriented fans.

The reality is that none of us has seen enough of guys like Jackson to rely on anything more than his numbers (even if we did have refined scouting tools, which I doubt any of us do).  But that's not true of the guys who are making the judgments for the Cubs.

I sense that Theo and Jed may value Rizzo more than they value Jackson (unlike Sveum, apparently), but everything they've said about Jackson indicates that they expect great things of him.  But they probably haven't thought about how the strikeouts will inherently keep that from happening.    ;)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 18, 2012, 01:32:32 pm
One thing is for sure is that Jackson is a pretty unique player.  There really aren't a lot of comps for a guy with good but not great power, above average speed, high K's, and high BB's. 

He basically has Mike Trout's tools (little more pop, and a little less speed) and Adam Dunn's plate discipline.

Not too many players like that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 18, 2012, 01:40:35 pm
If Jackson is a plus defensive CFer, that's a very important element in the overall assessment of his value.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on April 18, 2012, 01:57:14 pm
whatever became of that speedy, no-power OF we got from SF for Fontenot? was his name crawford?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 18, 2012, 02:21:00 pm
I think there is a wide gap in the way fans who adhere to an intensely stats orientation and the way that the Theo/Jed et al Cubs leadership assess players.  They keep saying that they rely heavily on scouting (not just physical tools, but makeup etc) and the fact that they mean it is going to lead to a lot of scratching of heads by more purely stats oriented fans.

This is a misconception.  Very few people have the kind of stats orientation that leads them to discount the importance of scouting anymore.  Everyone--even statistically-oriented fans--realizes that there is a lot more that goes into player evaluation than just stats.  No one is scratching their head at that. 

But the flip side is that stats also play a HUGE part in every front office now.  Theo and Jed also indicate that they do a lot of statistical analysis to go hand-in hand with their scouting.  Even the most scouting-oriented front office would acknowledge that by now...because if a GM doesn't acknowledge it, he's not going to have his job for long.

Quote
But they probably haven't thought about how the strikeouts will inherently keep that from happening.    ;)

I disagree...I suspect they have thought a lot about how strikeouts will keep him from reaching his full potential.  They know that with his current contact issues, it is pretty much impossible to hit for a high (or even decent) batting average in the majors.  And they're hoping a few more months in AAA will help him improve in that area.

Thinking about how strikeouts and BABIP interact to reduce a player's productivity does not take an "intensely statistical orientation."  It's pretty basic sabermetrics.  If you're putting the ball in play less often, you have to collect hits more often on balls in play to hit for the same average.  It takes a few minutes working with a basic Excel spreadsheet and freely-available stats to show how this interaction works; the front office is spending millions of dollars to build their player evaluation system which will be thousands of times more thorough than an Excel spreadsheet could ever be.  This is not going to be a foreign idea to Theo and Hoyer. 

I mean, sure, a lot more goes into their overall evaluation of Jackson than this...a lot more goes into anyone's evaluation (even statistically-minded fans).  But fundamentally, the front office realizes that a 30% strikeout rate means Jackson would have to have an unsustainable BABIP (or a sudden power surge, making him a 35-40+ HR hitter) in the majors to hit over about .250-.260.  They may not state it in exactly those words...but they know less contact means difficulty hitting for average, even if he hits the ball with consistently solid contact as well as anyone in the game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 18, 2012, 02:36:30 pm
Plus defense in CF is huge...so is plus defense at 1B!   

One great thing - whatever their offensive numbers - is that it appears both Jackson and Rizzo have the ability and work ethic to provide plus defense that at their respective positions at the MLB level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 18, 2012, 03:01:16 pm
It's always seemed to me that Mike Cameron makes a pretty good comp for Jackson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 18, 2012, 03:03:19 pm
I mean, sure, a lot more goes into their overall evaluation of Jackson than this...a lot more goes into anyone's evaluation (even statistically-minded fans).  But fundamentally, the front office realizes that a 30% strikeout rate means Jackson would have to have an unsustainable BABIP (or a sudden power surge, making him a 35-40+ HR hitter) in the majors to hit over about .250-.260.  They may not state it in exactly those words...but they know less contact means difficulty hitting for average, even if he hits the ball with consistently solid contact as well as anyone in the game.

Well, nothing Theo or Hoyer have said (much less Sveum, who isn't exactly a dope) suggests they have anything like this sort of analysis. The fact that you've reached the conclusions you have based on these specific stats doesn't mean they agree.  Nothing they have said suggests any doubt that Jackson will be a very successful major league player.  To the contrary, they've made clear that they see him as a core building block for the future.  There is no way that is consistent with your analysis of his limitations, based exclusively on stats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 18, 2012, 03:06:18 pm
Mike Cameron seems about right.  Maybe a little less defense (Cameron was truly elite; everyone seems to think Jackson is "merely" above average to good), but Cameron's .249/.338/.444 slash line seems about right unless Jackson can make more contact.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 18, 2012, 03:14:40 pm
Why would you expect Jax to be an average BABiP guy? What in his history suggests that?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 18, 2012, 03:21:53 pm
Well, nothing Theo or Hoyer have said (much less Sveum, who isn't exactly a dope) suggests they have anything like this sort of analysis. The fact that you've reached the conclusions you have based on these specific stats doesn't mean they agree.  Nothing they have said suggests any doubt that Jackson will be a very successful major league player.  To the contrary, they've made clear that they see him as a core building block for the future.  There is no way that is consistent with your analysis of his limitations, based exclusively on stats.

Where did I ever say I didn't expect Jackson to be a very successful major league player?  All I'm saying is that with his 30% strikeout rate, Jackson is not going to be able to hit .291/.393/.493 in the majors (or anything all that close to that) like he has done in the minors.  Talking specifically about offense only, that's impossible.  Of course Theo and Jed wouldn't say that publicly because they know better than to say anything that could reduce Jackson's value.  But to be a .291 hitter with a 30% strikeout rate,  Jackson would have to have a BABIP of .403.  Well over 100 years of baseball stats tell us that just isn't sustainable long term, and I don't think Theo and Jed would dispute that privately.

But even without his .291/.393/.493 minor league line, he's a productive player.  I suggested a .250/.340/.425 line for Jackson earlier today...once you add in good defense in CF, good baserunning ability, positive makeup, etc., you have a very productive player.  Better than average regular at least, maybe an All Star appearance or two.  Definitely someone you plan to keep around for 5+ years as a building block who is an above average leadoff, #2, or #6 hitter in a lineup.  But he's not someone that is ever going to be the superstar face of the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 18, 2012, 03:25:57 pm
Why would you expect Jax to be an average BABiP guy? What in his history suggests that?

I don't expect him to be an average BABIP guy.  But I set up a rough calculator in Excel...and with a 30% strikeout rate and 4% HR rate (that's 24 HR over 600 PA), he has to post a .336 BABIP to hit .250 overall.  That's a far, far above average BABIP.  Among the 1,784 players who have accumulated 3,000 PA, that would be right around #60 all time. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 18, 2012, 03:40:11 pm
I have not really envisioned Jackson as a superstar.  Rather as a very good ML CFer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 18, 2012, 05:13:30 pm
Not a great start for Torreyes.  He's batting .188 in 32ABs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 18, 2012, 06:37:09 pm
But a great start for Valbuena, hitting .275 in 32 at bats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 18, 2012, 07:47:17 pm
Well, nothing Theo or Hoyer have said (much less Sveum, who isn't exactly a dope) suggests they have anything like this sort of analysis. The fact that you've reached the conclusions you have based on these specific stats doesn't mean they agree.  Nothing they have said suggests any doubt that Jackson will be a very successful major league player.  To the contrary, they've made clear that they see him as a core building block for the future.  There is no way that is consistent with your analysis of his limitations, based exclusively on stats.

Just suppose that the Theocracy does have such doubts.  Suppose that they in fact agree completely with brjones in every particular about Jackson.  And suppose that their concerns are great enough that even though they do still like the guy and his chances, they would be quite eager to trade him.

Would you expect then to badmouth the guy in their public comments?

Would you expect them to say anything other than they believe he will be a franchise cornerstone they can count on?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 18, 2012, 07:49:23 pm
Not a great start for Torreyes.  He's batting .188 in 32ABs.

Disappointing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 18, 2012, 07:51:53 pm
I don't expect him to be an average BABIP guy.  But I set up a rough calculator in Excel...and with a 30% strikeout rate and 4% HR rate (that's 24 HR over 600 PA), he has to post a .336 BABIP to hit .250 overall.  That's a far, far above average BABIP.  Among the 1,784 players who have accumulated 3,000 PA, that would be right around #60 all time. 

Yes.  The most elementary data that impact batting average are BABIP, K-rate, and HR-rate.  Theo understands that, you don't need Carmen to recognize that.   Obviously there are other factors.  But valuing baserunning and defense doesn't obviate the reality that K-rate and HR-rate are very important for a player. 

Stats are the past, the future is what's of interest.  Scouting involves projecting how future performance will or might change from present performance.  Scouts could look at Samardzija's stats at Notre Dame, or his low K-rate during his first pro seasons.  But there were scouting reasons to think that his K/walk/HR rate might perhaps change.  BR, Theo, Sveum, and I can all look at Jackson's K/HR/BABIP rates past, the question is where will they evolve future.  Might he K less or HR more? 

Clearly Sveum's gush envisioned a future Jackson that might K less and HR more than what he's done thus far this season. 

br, your calculation seems perfectly fair and instructive.  .250 is a good starting point, and with defense, walks, power, and speed, Jackson might be a long-term useful player with a .250 batting average.  But if he wants to hit better than that, it will need to involve more HR's (ala Pena and Howard...), or less K's, or an elite BABIP.  I think any or all three of those are possible.  None are certain. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2012, 09:13:06 pm
Searle: 4-2-0-0-0-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_18_tenaax_hunaax_2


Beeler: 5-2/3 -9-1-0-1-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_18_tenaax_hunaax_1


Daytona off.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 18, 2012, 09:59:37 pm
Brett Jackson just walked in his 4th PA tonight in the 8th inning.  Why is that significant?  Because he might not come up again tonight...and if he doesn't, this will be the first game this year he's managed to avoid striking out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 18, 2012, 10:13:42 pm
Brett Jackson just walked in his 4th PA tonight in the 8th inning.  Why is that significant?  Because he might not come up again tonight...and if he doesn't, this will be the first game this year he's managed to avoid striking out.

See, all that worrying and hand wringing was all for nothing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2012, 10:26:44 pm
Jackson: 1-3, 2B, BB

Rizzo: 0-3, 2 K, HBP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_18_iowaaa_albaaa_1


Hernandez: 0-3, RBI  ( 6-47, 2 BB )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_18_cedafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 18, 2012, 10:48:17 pm
whatever became of that speedy, no-power OF we got from SF for Fontenot? was his name crawford?

494 Daytona AB last year for a slash line of .307/.362/.401/.763, 2 HR, 32-6 in steals, but playing almost 4 times as many games in LF now than CF, which is where he played almost exclusively before the Cubs got him.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=crawfo002eva

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 18, 2012, 11:21:12 pm
Surgery of some kind, I believe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 19, 2012, 08:06:02 am
Surgery of some kind, I believe.

According to http://www.thecubreporter.com/cubs-depth-chart Evan Crawford is at Fitch Park for rehab.

He had been assigned to play for the Smokies in AA before the season started.

From another site.   LF: Evan Crawford - The Cubs AA team will have one of the fastest OFs in organized baseball this year.  Crawford stole 32 bases last year and put up a respectable line of .307/.362/.401 at Daytona, but some scouts doubt his plate skills will translate at the upper levels.  Crawford will have to prove himself this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 19, 2012, 11:28:36 am
Maybe it wasn't surgery and it's a lesser rehab.  Would be nice for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 19, 2012, 02:09:36 pm
Camp in to pitch the sixth.  This should be entertaining.

Just wondering, at what point do you think we ought to start transitioning Trey McNutt to a relief role? 

Granted it'd be nice to see him succeed as a starter (especially since so many of our hard throwing "prospects" seem to get pigeonholed into relief relatively quickly), but McNutt really isn't showing much potential to pitch deep into games.   Since 2010, he's only averaged about 4.5 innings per start, and is only averaging 3.9 IP per start so far this season. It's one thing to be babying a young pitching prospect, but sooner or later if you're going to be a starting pitching prospect, you need to show you can average at least 6-7 IP per start.  When you've gone for over two years without being able to pitch past 4 or 5 innings, that's really not a good sign for your future as a workhorse starting pitcher, no matter what the reason is.

Maybe sooner or later, we need to just accept that he's a limited inning pitcher, let him take Camp's place, and start grooming into a relief role with the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 19, 2012, 02:53:03 pm
We need relievers more than starters at the major league level anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2012, 03:44:38 pm
Thursday EST update.

Concepcion: 5-6-2-1-1-4

Baez: 0-3, 2 K, 2 E

Arias: 2-2-0-0-0-2

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/04/19/concepcion-goes-five-giants-rally-edge-cubs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 19, 2012, 10:20:45 pm
Two more homers for Rizzo tonight, and a second straight game without strikeouts for Jackson (but he was 0 for 4).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 19, 2012, 10:40:45 pm
Rizzo for 1B and LaHair for LF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2012, 10:44:10 pm
Let Rizzo get the at-bats he needs with decent players, ie in Iowa.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 19, 2012, 10:46:01 pm
Both Rizzo and Jackson should stay in Iowa where they have better protection in the lineup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2012, 10:47:27 pm
Rizzo: 2-3, 2 HR, 3 RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_19_iowaaa_albaaa_1


Rhee: 5-6-5-5-2-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_19_tenaax_hunaax_1

Szczur: 0-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_19_tbyafa_dbcafa_1


Zapata: 3-5, RBI

Wells: 4-2/3 IP, 10 R, 6 ER

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_19_swmafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2012, 10:48:52 pm
It probably should be noted that Rizzo has just 3 walks to 11 strikeouts so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 20, 2012, 02:23:07 am
How Jackson is considered the better prospect is beyond me.  Rizzo has 7 homeruns in 52 abs.

Yikes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 20, 2012, 02:25:21 am
It's early, but that Cincy trade is looking like a dog.  Everyone from that deal (Sappelt, Torreyes, Wood) is playing poorly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 20, 2012, 07:44:57 am
So the Cubs and all of their minor league affiliates lost yesterday.  Not to mention the Bulls and B'Hawks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 20, 2012, 08:25:34 am
It's early, but that Cincy trade is looking like a dog.  Everyone from that deal (Sappelt, Torreyes, Wood) is playing poorly.

If everyone in that trade continues to play poorly and none of them spend another day in the majors, it's still a very good trade.  Marshall wasn't going to be around after 2012 anyway, and the Cubs weren't going to offer $12 million or more for one year so they could get a draft pick. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on April 20, 2012, 08:47:31 am
That reminds me...I met a guy from Dayton at one of my son's games earlier this season who was a big Reds fan...he was pretty meh on Sappelt and Wood, but really hated losing Torreyes...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 20, 2012, 06:56:08 pm
Torreyes is the key.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 20, 2012, 06:59:14 pm
Every team in the Cubs farm system is under .500 with Daytona having the worst record at 2-11.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 20, 2012, 07:01:55 pm
Torreyes is the key.

Wood is the key.  Torreyes is a nice-to-have.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2012, 08:17:50 pm
Chris Archer is still struggling:

Quote
• Chris Archer, rhp, Rays: The Rays are extremely willing to give pitchers time to develop. That's good news for Archer, because right now he's requiring a whole lot of patience. The 23-year-old righthander seemed to be on the cusp of greatness back in 2010 when he dominated the Florida State and the Southern leagues. But since being traded the following offseason to the Rays in the Matt Garza trade, Archer has taken significant steps back. He struggles to repeat his delivery and doesn't get ahead of enough hitters to fully take advantage of his plus slider. Archer still isn't giving up many hits, but 10 walks in 6 2/3 innings this week explains why he went 0-2, 43.88.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2012, 09:22:49 pm
Torreyes: 3-3, 2 2B, 3B, BB, E

Kirk: 7-5-1-1-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_20_tbyafa_dbcafa_1

 
Cabrera: 1-1/3 - 0-0-0-1-2, SV

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_20_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 20, 2012, 09:48:03 pm
Jes is right.  torreyez is the key to the Marshall trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 20, 2012, 09:56:30 pm
Whoever turns out to be the best player is the key to the Marshall trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2012, 09:57:33 pm
Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_20_swmafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2012, 10:48:00 pm
Jackson: 0-3, SF, 2 RBI

Rizzo: 0-4, 3 K

Vitters: 0-3, BB  (3 for last 25)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_20_iowaaa_albaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 20, 2012, 11:27:06 pm
No Ks again for Jax, eh?  I'm sure that will thrill those who'd rather see him with a .500 OPS and low K-rate than a .950 OPS and a 30% K-rate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 21, 2012, 10:09:13 am
You're obviously exaggerating...everyone wants to see Jackson hit.  But some of us realize that players with a 30% strikeout rate just usually aren't that good in the majors.

Below is a link to a list of every player who has ever accumulated 2,500 PA in the majors sorted by strikeout rate--a total of 2,074 players.  Of those players, only 7 (about one third of 1% of all players) have been good enough to take that many times at bat with a strikeout rate of 30% or greater.  Most of those stayed around that long because they have/had massive power to offset the strikeout rate (Mark Reynolds, Russell Branyan, Bo Jackson, Jack Cust, Rob Deer).  The other two just weren't all that good (Jake Stahl, Nixey Callahan). 

Even if you reduce the strikeout rate to 25%, and you still have only 18 players in history who have been good enough to compile 2,500 PA.  Of those, only four (Adam Dunn, Ryan Howard, Carlos Pena, and Brad Wilkerson) were able to consistently post OPSes in the high .700s or better, and three of those four are massive power guys.   The next best players on the list are guys like Jose Hernandez, Pete Incaviglia, and Jonny Gomes...those careers would be big disappointments for Jackson.   

History makes it pretty clear that guys with extremely high strikeout rates just don't have much success in the majors unless they also have a ton of power.  Maybe Jackson is the exception...maybe he'll be the next Brad Wilkerson (with better baserunning and defense; I think I've used that comparison before).  But if he did turn into that, he'd be the exception, not the rule.  They're better off leaving him in AAA all year if necessary if it will help him solve his contact issues.


http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=2500&type=8&season=2011&month=0&season1=1871&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&players=0&sort=10,d (http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=2500&type=8&season=2011&month=0&season1=1871&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&players=0&sort=10,d)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 21, 2012, 11:45:43 am
History makes it pretty clear that guys with extremely high strikeout rates just don't have much success in the majors unless they also have a ton of power.  Maybe Jackson is the exception...maybe he'll be the next Brad Wilkerson (with better baserunning and defense; I think I've used that comparison before).  But if he did turn into that, he'd be the exception, not the rule.  They're better off leaving him in AAA all year if necessary if it will help him solve his contact issues.

And while I agree, if they do that, they would also be better off making clear to the media and to the fans that 2012 and 2013 are NOT about winning.  They are about building the foundation for a dominant team for several years in the future, but that there is no concern at all about how many games are won or lost in 2012 or 2013.

Of course they might agree completely with your opinion about Jackson's future problems as a result of the K's and still bring him up anyway in the hope of trading him relatively quickly after other teams have had a bit closer look at him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 21, 2012, 11:57:39 am
Below is a link to a list of every player who has ever accumulated 2,500 PA in the majors sorted by strikeout rate--a total of 2,074 players.  Of those players, only 7 (about one third of 1% of all players) have been good enough to take that many times at bat with a strikeout rate of 30% or greater.  Most of those stayed around that long because they have/had massive power to offset the strikeout rate (Mark Reynolds, Russell Branyan, Bo Jackson, Jack Cust, Rob Deer).  The other two just weren't all that good (Jake Stahl, Nixey Callahan).

I initially thought you were talking about Larry Stahl, an unquestionably not "all that good" OFer/1B of the late 60's and early 70's.  But Jake Stahl was a bit different.  Dead ball era with a career OPS+ of 121 and 20.07 WAR for his 9 year career.  By comparison, Ryan Howard has been in the majors for 8 years and has a career WAR of 23.1, and Mark Reynolds in 6 years has a career WAR of 9.4.  Bo Jackson played 8 years in the majors and had a WAR of only 9.9.

Clearly Jake Stahl was no HOFer, but he would appear to have been been better than Mark Reynolds and at least a tad above "not all that good."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 21, 2012, 02:40:31 pm
Michael Jensen is starting to look pretty interesting.

Already 3 and 0 on the season, today he has 5 innings so far, with 2 hits, 0 earned runs, 5 strikeouts and 1 walk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2012, 03:47:59 pm
DeVoss: 0-4, 3 K

Hernandez: 0-4, 2 K, E ( 6-54 )

Jensen: 7-2-2-0-1-6,  12-4 GO/FO


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_21_swmafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 21, 2012, 04:26:39 pm
Michael Jensen is starting to look pretty interesting.

Already 3 and 0 on the season, today he has 5 innings so far, with 2 hits, 0 earned runs, 5 strikeouts and 1 walk.

Yes, he's been excellent.  Not the big, lanky, projectible guy the scouts love best.  But good control goes a long ways.  5 walks in 4 starts is pretty good for a 21-year-old.  And a 2.5 G/A seems awfully practical, too.  Between throwing strikes and getting groundouts, his efficiency has been great.  Pretty rare for a guy on April pitch counts to be going 6 and 7 innings consistently.  Very nice thus far. 

Not sure how fast he actually works, or if he projects any more.  And no idea if he has much of a breaking pitch, he hasn't flashed any knockout K-games yet despite presumably controlling the count very well.  But I admit I'm something of a believer that if a guy has the balance and repeatability to locate his fastball consistently, there's a fair chance that he'll have the balance and repeatability to develop a better slider and change and cutter as need demands.  When a guy can't even control his fastball, how likely is it that in a little while he'll be locating a curve and a change, much harder pitches to control?  But if you can already throw fastballs where you want, it seems less fanciful to imagine learning how to throw a breaking pitch for strikes eventually. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 21, 2012, 08:04:25 pm
Nice to see Torreyes getting some hits.  He's been one of the few players who has kicked in their walk-rates, without ballooning their K-rates. 

Ha has a decent walk rate thus far, unlike his awfuls in past, but now he's K'ing like crazy.  Szczur jumped his walk rate, but he's K'ing like a slugger and can't hit a lick.  Vitters is another like Torreyes who has walked more without jumping his K rate, but he's shown zero power.  But Torreyes has sustained a low K-rate (if inflated thus far) while jumping his walks some (small sample this early, obviously...), but is still getting a fair dose of his hits for extras.  Would be nice if he'd combine it all and work out.  And be healthy from here on out. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2012, 08:11:07 pm
Ha: 3-4, SB

Struck: 5-4-2-1-3-5

Antigua: 3-1-0-0-3-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_21_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2012, 08:49:14 pm
Szczur: 2-6, SB

Torreyes: 2-4, RBI, BB



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_21_tbyafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 21, 2012, 09:21:13 pm
Cubs in Memphis, 2-1 Cubs, after 4. 
Jackson with 2 hits, including a double. 
Rizzo with a hit and RBIs number 17 and 18!
Coleman pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 21, 2012, 09:39:07 pm
Cardenas and Valbuena are both doing a great job in AAA.  Any time they want to replace DeWitt with one of those guys...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 21, 2012, 10:03:31 pm
Baez is 0 for 13 with 6 strike outs since his run in with the opposing coach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2012, 10:13:40 pm
If you're talking about Baez' alleged comment after a homer, he had his cycle game and another good game after that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 21, 2012, 10:30:26 pm
Cubs 5-2 after 6...Rizzo with another hit and another RBI.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 21, 2012, 11:23:29 pm
Memphis just scored 9 runs in the 8th to take a big lead...Belliveau and Corpas lit up!

Sappelt hit his second HR, Jackson has two hits, Rizzo has two singles and three RBIs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2012, 11:59:47 pm
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_21_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 22, 2012, 12:07:37 am
Memphis just scored 9 runs in the 8th to take a big lead...Belliveau and Corpas lit up!

Sappelt hit his second HR, Jackson has two hits, Rizzo has two singles and three RBIs.
Sappelt's homer was an inside-the-park job.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 22, 2012, 12:12:21 am
This organization is as bad as I've seen in my life of 33 years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 22, 2012, 10:47:35 am
This organization is as bad as I've seen in my life of 33 years.

You haven't been watching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2012, 04:26:19 pm
Rusin: 8-2-0-0-0-4

Rizzo: 1-3, 2B, BB, K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_22_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1


Hernandez: 0-3, K , Down to .105

Francescon: 7-1-0-0-1-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_22_lanafx_peoafx_1


Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_22_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2012, 07:32:46 pm
Torreyes: 1-3, 3B, BB

Zych: 2-1-0-0-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_22_lakafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 22, 2012, 08:44:42 pm
Torreyes had a 5% walk rate last year, this year it's been over 12%.  Small sample size, so may not be the least bit sustainable.  But it's kind of neat to see, and he's got his average over .260 now.  For the moment, he and Zapata are about the only hitters below Iowa where I look forward to checking their box score lines. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 23, 2012, 01:52:39 am
Jackson is getting way too hyped; he's currently got a .239 ba with an obp of .329.

Corey Patterson, anyone?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 23, 2012, 12:10:23 pm
Jackson is getting way too hyped; he's currently got a .239 ba with an obp of .329.

Corey Patterson, anyone?

IsoD
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 23, 2012, 01:44:30 pm
You know, apart from the fact that I obviously disagree with the implied dismissal of Jackson in a big way, it's also wrong to keep citing Patterson as a washout.  Before he hurt his knee he was having a pretty darn good career, and he still ends up having a lot more success than the average first-round pick does.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 23, 2012, 01:53:26 pm
It's legitimate to point out Jackson's strike out rate as a weakness.  But, in my opinion, it's just plain silly to dismiss him based on that.  And to cite his low BA at this early point in the season as evidence that he's not a major prospect is even sillier, particularly given his tendency to be a streak hitter.

It never ceases to amaze me that some people here profess to have a better idea of who the better prospects are than guys who make their living doing that ... whether it be Jim Hendry or Jed Hoyer and Theo Epstein.

The fact is that most prospects don't succeed. So betting against any specific one tends to be a good bet. The harder thing is to assess which are and are not most likely to succeed. To try to out think guys like the current regime (which is obsessed with collecting and analyzing every bit of information they can get) based on as little actual information as any of us has here is, in my view, a fool's errand.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 23, 2012, 03:18:54 pm
a fool's errand.

What other kind of errand do you expect for anyone here?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 23, 2012, 03:46:40 pm
It's legitimate to point out Jackson's strike out rate as a weakness.  But, in my opinion, it's just plain silly to dismiss him based on that.  And to cite his low BA at this early point in the season as evidence that he's not a major prospect is even sillier, particularly given his tendency to be a streak hitter.

I don't think anyone is dismissing Jackson at this point (well, except bitterman, which is probably the only person you're really referring to...he's so over-the-top negative that you might as well try to have a conversation with Jes).  I've talked the most about Jackson's strikeouts over the last few days...but I've also consistently said that I think that even with his contact issues, he'll have a chance at being league average or a little better as the Cubs CF for several years. 

I also don't think anyone is trying to out think the current regime.  Obviously, major league front offices have a far better information than anyone here.  But that doesn't mean that the conclusions anyone here makes are completely uninformed.  I just think discussion is more interesting around here when we use all the information that is available to us.  And based on the information that is available, Jackson's current strikeout rate is a huge issue that could make the difference between being a fringe starter and an All Star caliber player.  Just my opinion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2012, 03:54:10 pm
Jackson: 2-4, SB

Rizzo: 2-3, 2B, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_23_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 23, 2012, 05:11:27 pm
brjones, please keep your opinions coming...your Jackson points have certainly been interesting to me.

And I agree with what Ron said re our baseball people having lots more information on which to base opinions...of course, ANY GM etc. can be wrong, as Ron points out...it's the different opinions of (and information from) good baseball people around here that make this board interesting.

That we all happen to share intense interest in the Cubs makes reviewing the posts here even more fun.

Guys, it's gonna take awhile, but we're gonna have a lot more fun down the road.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2012, 05:13:13 pm
Javier Baez went 0-4 with 2 K's today. According to AzPhil, his other two outs were on a flyball caught up against the wall and a flyball caught on the dive.

Baez is 0-17 with 8 K's since his cycle.

Phil also says Starling Peralta topped out at 95 mph today (3 IP, 3 H, BB, 4 K)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 23, 2012, 05:23:06 pm

That we all happen to share intense interest in the Cubs makes reviewing the posts here even more fun.

Guys, it's gonna take awhile, but we're gonna have a lot more fun down the road.

We're going to need scantily clad cheerleaders and lots of free beer before it gets anywhere near fun.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on April 23, 2012, 05:52:34 pm
We may need **** dancers and free whiskey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 23, 2012, 07:05:36 pm
But that doesn't mean that the conclusions anyone here makes are completely uninformed.

While being well informed can help decision-making, lots of absolutely terrible decisions are made with complete information.

That was the biggest problem with Hendry, and is the most encouraging fact about the Theocracy.

It is not that the Theocracy gets more or better information, or that they are better thinkers when they evaluation that information to decide what to do with it (though both may also be true and certainly can help).  The most encouraging thing is that it appears the Theocracy is willing to write off a could of seasons without really worrying about contending every year in order to help build what is needed to field a winner for an extended period.

Though Hendry had some utterly horrible seasons, he never really seemed to accept the idea of accepting terrible records as part of an overall strategic approach.  He still HAD seasons with terrible records, but he never seemed to do so as part of a longer term strategy, but instead simply because of ineptitude.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2012, 09:45:04 pm
Does any organization have less offense than the Cubs'?


Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_23_lakafa_dbcafa_1

Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_23_lakafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 23, 2012, 09:48:22 pm
Jacob Turner had 0 K's in 4 IP against Daytona.  The Tigers can't be feeling too good about that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 23, 2012, 09:49:41 pm
Does any organization have less offense than the Cubs'?

Right now, this organization is just a mess.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2012, 10:08:00 pm
Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_23_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 23, 2012, 11:00:17 pm
0 Ks in 20 ABs for Jackson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 24, 2012, 09:53:04 am
Gerardo Concepcion has been added to the Peoria roster and will start Wednesday night.

The Chiefs have also added Cuban born catcher Yaniel Cabezas. 

Rafael Lopez goes to the DL with an eye infection.

Scott Wesimann has been sent to Double A Tennessee
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on April 24, 2012, 02:01:15 pm
Mota with the W....bring him up to the big league squad
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 24, 2012, 04:41:58 pm
Rhee: 5-9-7-5-1-5

Ha: 3-5, 2 2B, 2 K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_24_cngaax_tenaax_1


Jackson: 0-3, 2 BB, 2 K, SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_24_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1


DeVoss: 1-4, 2B, 3 K

Hoilman: Walk-off GS, 3 K

Burke got the start: 6-3-0-0-1-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_24_lanafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 24, 2012, 08:57:21 pm
Szczur: 2-3, 2B, RBI, 2 BB

Simpson: 4-1/3 -8-6-5-7-2, HR, WP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_24_dbcafa_lakafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 24, 2012, 09:10:50 pm
How in the world did we blow a first round pick on Simpson?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 24, 2012, 09:12:35 pm
Because some smart scout from another team claimed his team was going to take him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 24, 2012, 09:52:52 pm
2 hits (one a double), two walks for Szczur tonite!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2012, 12:12:16 am
Quote
Hayden Simpson ranged anywhere from 84-89 with the fastball tonight although he was almost always around 86. He struck out the first batter and then pretty much fell apart. He fell behind hitters and with that kind of velocity when he tried to come back on 2-0 counts he got crushed. The trainers went out once to check on him then left, the announcers sounded pretty frustrated and basically this couldn't be more of a train wreck.

http://www.obstructedview.net/minor-leagues/the-children-are-the-future-cubs-minor-league-update-sponsored-by-advil.html


Quote
When the Cubs drafted Hayden Simpson in the first round in 2010, they left many teams shocked, as Simpson was generally though to be a third to fifth-round talent heading into the draft. Two years later, the Cubs' decision to buck the industry consensus isn't paying off.

Simpson gave up eight hits, seven walks and six runs, five of which were earned, in 4 1/3 innings in a 13-5 loss to Lakeland Tuesday night. It was the third straight rough outing for Simpson. Simpson has now allowed 38 baserunners in 17 innings for high Class A Daytona, which explains his 7.94 ERA.

But probably just as troubling, Simpson's mid-90s fastball continues to be missing. Last year, Simpson's fastball dipped to the mid-80s. At the time the Cubs blamed it on a bad case of mononucleosis, and then there was a stress reaction in his elbow. But a year later, there are some legitimate concerns that Simpson's velocity may not never get back to what it was back in 2010.

At this point, Simpson is having to try to survive without a pitch that misses bats. It's a nearly impossible task as he's struck out four of the 88 batters he's faced this year.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/04/cubs-hayden-simpson-struggles-carry-over-into-2012/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2012, 03:49:27 am
EST from Tuesday:

Dunston: 2-4, 2B

Arias: 3-4-2-2-1-7


http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/04/24/diamondbacks-take-advantage-cub-miscues-talking-stick
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 25, 2012, 06:54:55 am
"may not never"?  What does that mean?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 25, 2012, 08:56:47 am
Szczur isn't having a horrible start ... he's just getting murdered by lefties.  Against righties his obp is .417.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 25, 2012, 09:09:17 am
My problem w/ Jackson is the same as it was when he was drafted ... he's a K machine.  How many impact low power, high-K guys are there in the majors?  His obp is the only thing I see that is separating him from a Tyler Colvin type prospect, but as has been discussed, how likely is he to keep that obp high in the majors w/ his k-rate?   I hope he spends awhile in Iowa working on that.  It's his only chance .. and so far ... it appears the front office is asserting that he won't be called up any time soon.  He's a Cub, I wish him well, but Rizzo is a far superior prospect.  Rizzo currently leads the PCL in HRs and is 3rd in RBIs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 25, 2012, 09:19:13 am
W/ the draft getting closer, here's a reminder of rule changes:

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/news/2011/2612639.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 25, 2012, 09:25:40 am
His obp is the only thing I see that is separating him from a Tyler Colvin type prospect

Tyler Colvin with the ability to take walks (and presumably, the ability to recognize pitches) would have been an excellent prospect.  That's like saying the only difference between Chris Volstad and Brandon Webb in his prime is an ability to locate pitches...that's a pretty huge difference.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 25, 2012, 09:32:19 am
We've had this Colvin/Jackson talk before ... my point is ... if his obp is his only advantage over Colvin ... it's very possible that obp is going to take a dip in the majors and now he's no longer that significant different from Colvin.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 25, 2012, 09:33:54 am
It hasn't been talked about much, but the new rules take away the tools that brought Epstein most of his success.  He consistently had the equivalent of 4 or 5 first round draft picks every year, by paying far over slot to players who were considered to be tough signs.

This will pretty much be gone under the new rules.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 25, 2012, 09:35:14 am
Rizzo is a better prospect than Jackson.

That doesn't mean that Jackson is bad.  Not everyone can be number one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 25, 2012, 11:25:11 am
"No power"?  Really showing the expertise, there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on April 25, 2012, 12:01:15 pm
W/ the draft getting closer, here's a reminder of rule changes:

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/news/2011/2612639.html

There's also a lottery for six extra picks following both the first and second rounds. Teams that are in the bottom 10 in revenue and/or market size go into a pool for six picks after the first round, with odds of winning based on the prior season's winning percentage. Teams that don't get one of those picks—and any other team that receives money from revenue sharing—then goes into another lottery for six picks after the second round. The odds of winning are based on prior season winning percentage.

I don't think I had ever heard that change before.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 25, 2012, 12:24:57 pm
All you ever wanted to know and more about Michael Brenly

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2012/apr/23/michael-brenly-follows-in-famous-fathers/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 25, 2012, 01:11:44 pm
It's now the end of April.  Soler left Cuba well before the calendar turned.  Any guess what the holdup is?  And if it's held him up for 8 months, any reason why we should expect he should get clear within the next month or so? 

He's going to lose a whole lot of millions if he has to sign under the upcoming CBA.  And if the team that does sign him blows it's international budget on him, they'll lose some prospects. 

I'd very much like to see that resolved soon, but it's been all quiet for quite some time now. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on April 25, 2012, 01:22:28 pm
I just tweeted Miles about Soler.  He said Soler still isn't a free agent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on April 25, 2012, 01:25:11 pm
Says the residency procedures are getting finalized.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 25, 2012, 03:46:59 pm
I hope it's getting finalized faster than was happening before.  Both Domincan Republic and Selig's office will need to approve.  So we need to get that wrapped up with some margin on the Dominican end.  Obviously Soler's agent knows all this better than I do, because a $20+ million deal could be shrunk to a $5 million deal after the new deadline.  I'm sure it's prejudicial of me to think that bribery is any more likely in Dominican offices than in Bud Selig's office. But I'd have to think that the agent might be willing to expedite the Dominican process if he sees the clock ticking too dangerously close to deadline. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2012, 04:48:57 pm
Szczur: 0-3, 2 SB, BB, 2 K

Torreyes: 2-5, 2 SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_25_dbcafa_clrafa_1


Iowa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 25, 2012, 04:52:42 pm
Torreyes is 19 years old.  He has only 6 K's in 55 official ABs to go along with 6 BB's.  How solid is he defensively at SS?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2012, 05:46:25 pm
EST from Wednesday:

Baez: 1-4, 2 K (0 BB, 11 swinging K's overall), E

Vogelbach: 1-3, HR, RBI, K
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 25, 2012, 06:12:57 pm
Concepcion gives up 5 runs in his first inning. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 25, 2012, 06:57:12 pm
Torreyes is 19 years old.  He has only 6 K's in 55 official ABs to go along with 6 BB's.  How solid is he defensively at SS?

And most, if not all 6 k's came in his first 6 games or so.

I haven't heard anything about his defense, other than he has a strong arm.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 25, 2012, 07:59:39 pm
Szczur seems to be something of a binge base-stealer.  Last year he ended with 24, but got about ten of them within one week early, it seemed. 

I'd hoped he'd emerge as a big-time basestealer this year, but when he had only 4 after 14 games, it seemed like wasn't happening.  But now suddenly he's binged again, 6 in his last 5 games. 

As bad as he's been hitting, his OBP is at .348, with 10 SB in 19 games.  If I had a good-fielding big-league CF with a .348 OBP and stealing at that rate (80 SB in a 162-game season?), I'd be pretty happy leading off with that.  We'll see how things go. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2012, 08:05:48 pm
DeVoss: 2-5, HR, RBI, CS

Hernandez: 0-4, 2 K, E

Concepcion: 5-8-5-5-1-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_25_peoafx_lcoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on April 25, 2012, 08:36:50 pm
Is Torreyes playing SS?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2012, 09:51:09 pm
Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_25_tenaax_jacaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 25, 2012, 10:36:50 pm
Is Torreyes playing SS?

He played there today.  I don't know if that is the first time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 25, 2012, 11:39:10 pm
Torreyes has been playing SS fairly regularly so far...before today, Baseball Reference had 7 games at 2B, 4 at SS, and 2 as a DH.  So that would make today his 5th game at SS. 

Torreyes seems to have pretty elite contact skills, but he's not a big guy...currently listed at 140 pounds.  Even Jose Altuve--who has gotten a lot of attention on Baseball Tonight just because he's smaller than the average major leaguer--is listed at 155.  Torreyes is a really interesting prospect, but it's hard to project much for a guy who is that much of an outlier on size.

I'm not a big believer of "Camp Colvin", or whatever it's called now.  But Torreyes seems like a guy who could turn into a pretty great prospect by doing what Barney did this past offseason. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 26, 2012, 01:25:43 am
Barney's OPS was 40 points better last April than this April, and Colvin is still K-ing a third of the time and has 1 BB all season.  If bulking up made you a better player, everyone would do it.  It's not that easy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 26, 2012, 07:50:43 am
If bulking up made you a better player, everyone would do it.  It's not that easy.

I agree with that...I'm not ready to conclude anything is different about Barney yet, and I never bought into Colvin.  But Torreyes is an extreme case in that he'd probably be the smallest guy in the majors by a pretty wide margin.  There's no reason a guy who is different from everyone else in the majors couldn't succeed...but there's probably also a reason you don't see a lot of 140 pounders in MLB. 

It would probably benefit if only to keep talent evaluators from prematurely judging him and to stop his future managers from viewing him as a guy who needs to sacrifice bunt all the time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 26, 2012, 10:41:57 am
....If bulking up made you a better player, everyone would do it.  It's not that easy.

Bulk has no impact on hitting *skills*.  If you're like Colvin and you can't recognize or respond to a strike vs a ball, or a breaking ball versus a fastball, good luck trying to create those aptitudes by bulking up.

But in Torreyes's case, there are some indications that his hitting skills may be really good.  He may have unusually good pitch/movement/strike-zone recognition, and an unusual ability to hit the ball on the nose.  Gifts/skills/aptitudes that can't be taught, or created by bulk or repetition. But if he's a true-blue hitter, but is just too small/weak/powerless for that to be useful, bulking up could seem to directly address what's lacking. 

Of course, it may be that bulking up might eventually impede the swing and the muscle quickness, so perhaps at some point it would become counterproductive. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 26, 2012, 11:09:45 am
I guess there is concern that he needs to be somewhat of a threat to hit for extra bases.  Otherwise, at the ML level, he will be consistently challenged by pitchers and will have a tough time getting BBs and sustaining the high OBP he will need to be useful offensively.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on April 26, 2012, 11:53:57 am
The key is to bulk up in the right way...bulk for bulk's sake will impede more than help.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 26, 2012, 12:06:53 pm
So far in his minor league career, Torreyes has been able to hit for a pretty decent slugging pct.  Whether he'll be able to sustain that against more skilled pitching remains to be seen.  That said, if he is a plus SS defensively, I would consider him to be a very promising prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 26, 2012, 12:19:11 pm
Baseball America still isn't very impressed with Concepcion . . .

Gerardo Concepcion Lit Up In Pro Debut For Cubs

Posted Apr. 25, 2012 8:10 pm by Ben Badler
Filed under: Daily Dish

Gerardo Concepcion's pro debut got ugly fast.

Concepcion, a 20-year-old Cuban lefthander who signed this year with the Cubs, gave up five runs in the first inning against low Class A Lake County (Indians), though he stayed in the game and pitched around trouble the rest of the way, finishing with five runs allowed in five innings, with eight hits, one walk and two strikeouts.

Concepcion received a reported five-year, $6 million major league deal, a surprising amount to many scouts given Concepcion's stuff, and reports from extended spring training in Arizona were consistent with those pre-signing reports.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/04/gerardo-concepcion-lit-up-in-pro-debut-for-cubs/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 26, 2012, 12:51:53 pm
Whatever he ends up being with the bat, Torreyes is a 2B. He's being tried at SS just to keep options open. Doesn't have the arm or range for short.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 26, 2012, 02:25:17 pm
Thanks, Deeg.  That raises the bar on what will be required of Torreyes offensively.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 26, 2012, 09:15:13 pm
Szczur: 1-4, 3B, RBI, SB, BB, 2 K

Torreyes: 2-3, RBI, K

Kirk: 6-6-2-1-2-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_26_dbcafa_clrafa_1


Jensen: 5 IP, 5 R

DeVoss: 1-4, RBI, 2 BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_26_peoafx_lcoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 26, 2012, 09:47:43 pm
Struck: 5-1/3 -9-7-7-1-3, 2 HR

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_26_tenaax_jacaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 26, 2012, 09:50:13 pm
Jackson: 1-5, 2 K

Rizzo: 2-4, 2 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_26_nasaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2012, 08:25:28 pm
Francescon: 6-2-0-0-0-8

Hoilman: HR, 2 RBI, 4 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_27_peoafx_lcoafx_1


Szczur: 1-4, 2B, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_27_dbcafa_clrafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2012, 08:38:29 pm
Two EST games Friday.

Baez: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 2 K

Vogelbach: 1-4, 2B, RBI, K, 2 E


http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/04/27/cubs-take-two-giants-indian-school-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2012, 09:32:29 pm
McNutt: 3-1-0-0-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_27_tenaax_jacaax_1


Iowa PP'd
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 27, 2012, 09:40:29 pm
Iowa PP'd

At least they didn't have to doodie.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 27, 2012, 09:41:32 pm
McNutt: 3-1-0-0-0-2

McNutt needs to be turned into a reliever.  3 innings?  Sheesh, how much longer are they going to baby him like this?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 27, 2012, 09:42:29 pm
Marmol is going to need to be replaced eventually, so the transition for McNutt probably needs to start happening in the near future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 27, 2012, 10:14:55 pm
The pitching situation on the farm is just quite honestly embarrassingly bad, especially if Maples is still having health issues.  I'm not sure I ever remember the Cubs being this thin in pitching prospects since I've started following the farm seriously back in '97.

Just a rundown on our top pitching prospects entering the season:

1.  McNutt - Still rarely pitches past the 3rd or 4th inning.
2.  Maples - Hurt shoulder
3.  Rhee - 5.73 ERA
4.  Beeler - Nothing terribly wrong with what he's doing thus far, but still only 12 K's in 22 IP.  Probably not a front line pitcher at least.
5.  Whitenack - Still recovering from Tommy John.
6.  Rosario - 5.85 ERA in Peoria
7.  Wells - 6.23 ERA in Peoria
8.  Simpson - 7.94 ERA in Daytona

In terms of starting pitching prospects, the Cubs right now have to be one of the very worst teams in baseball I would have to think.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on April 27, 2012, 10:36:13 pm
Other than Rizzo, our top hitting prospects aren't doing much either. Jackson and Vitters are struggling in AAA, nobody's done much in AA, high-A or low-A. Lake hasn't even played a game yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2012, 01:29:36 am
Quote
McNutt needs to be turned into a reliever.  3 innings?


McNutt was on a pitch count after just returning from the DL.

Don't worry, I didn't know either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2012, 01:34:59 am
Might have to start watching Francescon. Take out his 3rd start (3-2/3 IP) and he's allowed 11 hits and 1 walk to go along with 25 K's.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 28, 2012, 03:23:27 am

McNutt was on a pitch count after just returning from the DL.

Don't worry, I didn't know either.

Honestly I'm kind of tired of hearing even something like that as an excuse.  For most pitchers who actually are starting pitching prospects, going 5 innings after a DL stint isn't that big of a deal.  Also, he wasn't just coming off the DL for the first three starts he had this year. 

Sooner or later if you're going to be taken seriously as a starting pitching prospect, you need to be able to go at least 6 IP consistently.  Seems like Fleita keeps coming up with every excuse under the sun on why McNutt can't go 6-7 innings into a game (including "unlucky with rain" which was actually in his BA scouting report this year).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 28, 2012, 03:27:15 am
Might have to start watching Francescon. Take out his 3rd start (3-2/3 IP) and he's allowed 11 hits and 1 walk to go along with 25 K's.

Not a good sign for your organization when a 23 year old from Trevecca Nazarene in Low-A is looking like your most impressive pitching prospect to start the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 28, 2012, 07:46:54 am
What was McNutt's latest DL injury, do you know Chris? 

Baez has been quite a K matchine in mesa.  If he's K'ing 1/3 of his AB against XST pitching in Arizona where they always tell us that breaking balls don't break much, what will it be like once he starts facing advanced pitchers with breaking balls in breaking ball air? 

If he's a zillion-K's-to-no-walks guy, which seems to be the profile thus far, he might need to hit 40 HR to make it up. 

Hopefully he'll get better.  But I haven't seen many of the big-tools whiffaholics in short-season ever become contact hitters up the line. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 28, 2012, 07:47:01 am
Didn't we discuss this the other day in regard to Baez?

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1035006-30-worst-clubhouse-cancers-in-baseball-history
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 28, 2012, 07:56:43 am
I'm pretty sure I had read somewhere that McNutt had blister problems again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 28, 2012, 08:57:07 am
Yep, it was blisters.

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2012/04/cubsminors42312.php
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 28, 2012, 09:06:40 am
Other than Rizzo, our top hitting prospects aren't doing much either. Jackson and Vitters are struggling in AAA, nobody's done much in AA, high-A or low-A. Lake hasn't even played a game yet.

After a slow start, Torreyes, who along with Vogelbach is my current favorite among prospects, is also doing well.  He is only 19, and last year in A ball he hit .356 with an .855 OPS, which is pretty good for a middle infielder.  Right now he is at .265/.722 with 6 walks and only 7 K's, but that is after a truly horrible start.  In the last 10 games he has a line of    .297/.378/.837.  He is currently the youngest player in his league.  He doesn't turn 20 until September and he is the only 19 year old in the league.

Forget Sappelt and Wood.  In a couple of years, Torreyes is going to be seen as the key to the Marshall trade.

And beyond Torreyes, Castillo has a hitting line of .320/.435/.520/.955.  For some reason, that kind of hitting line from a catcher in AAA does seem rather impressive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 28, 2012, 09:18:42 am
Catchers in the Cubs farm system

Iowa
Welington Castillo  .320/.435/.520
Blake Lalli  .219/.219/.313

Tennessee
Juan Apodaca  .207/.361/.310
Mike Brenly  .170/.220/.234

Daytona
Chad Noble  .137/.164/.176


Who gets promoted to Iowa if Welington Castillo does get called up?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 28, 2012, 09:44:09 am
Who gets promoted to Iowa if Welington Castillo does get called up?

Not sure the guy's name, but it looks like the promotion will be a bum, whichever one it is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 28, 2012, 03:07:49 pm
Replacement catcher for Welington Castillo at Iowa - Koyie Hill?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 28, 2012, 05:13:51 pm
Catchers in the Cubs farm system

Iowa
Welington Castillo  .320/.435/.520
Blake Lalli  .219/.219/.313

Tennessee
Juan Apodaca  .207/.361/.310
Mike Brenly  .170/.220/.234

Daytona
Chad Noble  .137/.164/.176


Who gets promoted to Iowa if Welington Castillo does get called up?
The answer is Juan Apodaca.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 28, 2012, 05:16:11 pm
Replacement catcher for Welington Castillo at Iowa - Koyie Hill?
The Reds assigned Koyie Hill to the Pensacola Blue Wahoos today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 28, 2012, 06:04:50 pm
The Reds assigned Koyie Hill to the Pensacola Blue Wahoos today.

They clearly don't see all the positive things he does on the field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2012, 09:49:40 pm
Rusin: 6-3-0-0-2-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_28_nasaaa_iowaaa_1


Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_28_lakafa_dbcafa_1

Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_28_tenaax_jacaax_1

Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_28_peoafx_ftwafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 29, 2012, 10:14:32 am
The Iowa Cubs added catcher Juan Apodaca on Saturday from the Double-A Tennessee roster to take Welington Castillo’s spot after Castillo was called up to the Cubs. Apodaca batted .207 with three doubles and one RBI in 11 games with the Smokies.  Behind the plate, he was 3-for-14 in throwing out opposing base runners. The Cubs signed Apodaca as a Minor League free agent in January. Last season, he hit .184 in 30 games with Double-A Akron in the Indians organization. Apodaca originally signed with the Dodgers in 2003 as a first basemen and converted to catcher in 2004. He was selected by the Reds in the Rule 5 Draft in 2007 and then traded to the Boston Red Sox.  This is his 10th season in minor league baseball.  He came into this season with a career batting average of .247 with 37 home runs and 207 RBIs. His only other Triple-A experience was 14 games with Pawtucket in 2010.

– Carrie Muskat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2012, 04:16:51 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2B

Simpson: 1-2/3 -3-2-2-3-2, balk,  (in relief)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_29_dbcafa_lakafa_1


Iowa rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2012, 05:26:13 pm
Easterling: 0-4, 2 K  ( 10-48, 3 BB, 20 K )

Wells: 5-1/3 -2-0-0-3-3,  10-2 GO/FO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_29_peoafx_ftwafx_1


Hatley: 3-1-0-0-1-4  ( 11-2/3 IP, 3 BB, 15 K )


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_29_tenaax_jacaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 30, 2012, 09:56:50 am
Quote
You’ve heard about Brett Jackson and Anthony Rizzo, but they may not be the best player on the Triple-A Iowa roster. Keep an eye on Adrian Cardenas.


Plus lots of other stuff

http://muskat.mlblogs.com/2012/04/30/430-extra-bases-from-des-moines/ (http://muskat.mlblogs.com/2012/04/30/430-extra-bases-from-des-moines/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 30, 2012, 10:01:49 am
Cardenas has 3 K's in 74 official ABs!  His OPS is .914.  I wonder how strong he is defensively.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 30, 2012, 10:09:35 am
The most eye opening figures in Cardenas' stat line are 7 walks with 3 Ks and 73 AB.  That is pretty impressive.  His BB/K ration and his K/AB numbers have always been good.  This year they have moved well beyond that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 30, 2012, 10:15:10 am
I looked through the article and didn't see...can he play third?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 30, 2012, 10:18:08 am
Cardenas has played 98 games at 3B in the minors.... and has a .904 fielding percentage there.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2012, 10:30:22 am
Cardenas is not a good defensive player, which is a big reason why we were able to get him on a waiver claim.  He may even be relegated to left field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 30, 2012, 11:33:37 am
Even if he doesn't field any of them well, he has played 2B, SS, 3B and LF, and can hit.  Could be a nice bat first bench player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 30, 2012, 11:36:20 am
If Adrian Cardenas is better than Brett Jackson and Anthony Rizzo, it's definitely time to get serious about contracting the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2012, 12:22:29 pm
Uh, oh.  Concepcion is starting to look like the first big time blunder for the Theocracy.

Quote
Gerardo Concepcion - S - Cubs

Cubs prospect Gerardo Concepcion allowed seven runs in less than an inning Monday at Low-A Peoria. That marks back-to-back rough outings for Concepcion, who surrendered five runs in his first professional start last week. The 20-year-old Cuban left-hander was signed to a five-year, $6 million contract in mid-March. He will have to begin making some adjustments.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2012, 12:30:37 pm
On Concepcion, I wonder who's the guy who ultimately is responsible for a decision to give a guy like that $6 million and how that decision gets made by the Cubs.

For instance, is it Paul Weaver or Oneri who goes to McLeod and/or Theo and tells them they need $6 million to sign this guy and the Theocracy mostly trusts the judgment of their international scouting department that he's worth the money?

Or do Theo, McLeod, Oneri, and Weaver all collectively see roughly the same amount of film or watch roughly the same number of games and workouts on him, do all the bargaining with his agent, and come to a collective decision on whether he's worth $6 million?

I guess I'm wondering if Concepcion does turn out to be the kind of overpriced brain fart that most people in the industry thought it was, is this one mostly on the Hendry holdovers like Fleita and Weaver, or is there pretty much equal blame to go around in the Theocracy?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2012, 12:36:26 pm
And if it is mostly Fleita's and Weaver's recommendation to give him $6 million, I wonder how much of a leash Theo and McLeod are going to give them in the future.

If Concepcion quickly establishes himself as a bust, that might turn out to be one of those unforgiveable mistakes for the international scouting department.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 30, 2012, 01:14:59 pm
I'd give the guy more than 2 starts before drawing any conclusions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2012, 01:34:33 pm
I'd give the guy more than 2 starts before drawing any conclusions.

Yeah I know it's really early, and hopefully he'll settle down after a couple of starts.  Maybe he's still jittery being in a new country, trying impress people, trying to justify the bonus, etc.

Still, for a $6 million guy, he's getting hit around really really hard by Low-A hitters so far, and that signing didn't get a lot of positive reviews from the scouting community to begin with.  When you sign a 20 year old for $6 million, you'd honestly expect him to be dominating Low-A, and instead he's being lit up by Low-A hitters.

At the very least, I don't think it's inappropriate to start raising some red flags.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 30, 2012, 02:36:23 pm
I'm not sure that most of the industry thinks that Concepcion was a brain fart.  I have seen a couple of guys say that they were surprised at the money involved, but that is a far cry from the entire industry.

I would assume that Fleita (actually Jose Serra) does the scouting, and the provides the information to Hoyer, who is GM.  Serra then probably starts to negotiate with the kid, and provides feedgback to Hoyer, who probably has the last word on approval.  It might be that Epstein has to sign off on it, but perhaps not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 30, 2012, 03:07:27 pm
Ouch.  Depressing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 30, 2012, 05:18:53 pm
Memphis, TN - RH Daniel Berlind joins the Iowa Cubs from double-A Tennessee today. He will be available out of the bullpen tonight as the Cubs open a four-game series in Memphis.

Berlind was 0-2 with a 13.50 ERA in seven games with the Smokies this season. After allowing eight runs on seven hits in two-thirds on an inning in his first appearance, Berlind has allowed four runs in 7.1 innings in his last six appearances. Berlind spent most of last season with single-A Peoria in the Midwest League, going 1-3 with a 4.56 ERA and four saves in 16 games for the Chiefs. He joined Iowa for three games in August and allowed one run on five hits in three innings. He finished the season in Tennessee. The Cubs originally drafted Berlind in the 44th round of the 2006 draft, but he didn't sign. He did sign with the Minnesota Twins as a seventh round pick in 2007. After three seasons, the Twins released Berlind. He spent the 2010 season with independent Sussex, before signing with the Cubs on June 29, 2011.



Berlind hasn't given up a homer yet.  That must be it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 30, 2012, 05:44:02 pm
Or the others are even worse...geeeeeezuuussss

Perhaps the Cubs have discovered he's pitching with the wrong hand and there's still hope.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 30, 2012, 06:25:51 pm
Put Barney at SS, Castro at 3B, and Cardenas as 2B ... can't think of better lineup given what this team currently has.  Ian Stewart is toast offensively.  For the outfield, Id have Campana, Mather, and Dejesus.  My every day catcher is Clevenger when he's healed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 30, 2012, 06:27:30 pm
Gerardo Concepcion is Cuban for Hayden Simpson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 30, 2012, 07:15:14 pm
DeVoss: 2-3, 2B, SB, 2 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_30_peoafx_ftwafx_1


Szczur: 2-5, 3B, SB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_30_dbcafa_lakafa_1


Tenn off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 30, 2012, 07:39:16 pm
Szczur has a .973 OPS with 9 SB over his last ten games.  I think he's kind of hot. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 30, 2012, 07:49:38 pm
Szczur's last 10 games:  39 AB, .333/.435/.973 6XBH, 15 runs, 9 SB/1 CS.

If he keeps that up he might possibly amount to something.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 30, 2012, 08:25:32 pm
There was some questioning whether Ceasar had base stealing speed.  So far, in a season where he hasn't hit really well, he is 13 for 16.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 30, 2012, 09:43:43 pm
Rizzo with 2 more rbis (23 in April) and 2 more hits, now at .384 for the year.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 30, 2012, 10:02:48 pm
Jackson: 1-3, 2 BB, RBI, PO/CS

Rizzo: 2-4, 2 RBI, K, CS

Vitters: 1-4  ( 3 extra-base hits in 69 AB's, 0 HR )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_04_30_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 30, 2012, 10:06:35 pm
GREAT Aprils for Rizzo and LaHair!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 01, 2012, 04:21:16 am
What's Lahairs K rate ... 45 percent or so?  Anyone want to argue that his current production is sustainable w/ that?

It's about time to write Vitters off.  No power and an obp of around .307.

Call Cardenas up, already.  Sit Stewart and push Castro to 3B.

The PCL is hitting .310 against Travis Wood.

Sczur's numbers are skewed by the fact he's getting torn apart by lefties.  Against righties, his obp is over .410.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on May 01, 2012, 04:38:52 am
How in the world would Cardenas push Castro to 3b? Cardenas' defense is poor at SECOND. And if Stewart keeps up his approach, he'll do just fine. He's making great contact and is limiting his K's. His numbers are just the result of early season sample size crap.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 01, 2012, 08:20:39 am
Barney goes to SS, Cardenas to 2B.  His numbers (Stewart) are the result of someone who cant hit. 1300+ ABs w/ an obp of .319.  And this from a guy who spent his career in Colorado.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2012, 08:26:44 am
From what I've seen from Barney at shortstop, he really isn't all that great there.  He honestly looked really bad in the one spring game I saw him play at short.  He doesn't have all that good of an arm, and it looks like his range at short is in Theriot territory. 

I think a lot of us would turn out to be disappointed in Barney's defense if we did do a realignment where he took over at short.

And a Cardenas/Barney middle infield I think would be really awful defensively.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 01, 2012, 08:36:13 am
I still don't understand the obsession some have with moving Castro off shortstop.  Yes, he has had problems there.  But must shortstops his age are making just as many errors in high A or AA.  If his issues seemed to be a lack of throwing arm or lack of range, I could see it...but most of his issues seem to be mental, and may be able to be fixed.  Since this team isn't likely to contend this year, give him some time. 

I also can't figure out why anyone thinks his mental/mechanical issues would be any better at second or third base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2012, 08:41:35 am
Yeah I agree.  Leave the guy at short.  It's still way too early to be discussing moving him off of there.

Even with his lapses in the field, all-around offensively and defensively he's still a decidedly above average player at short.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 01, 2012, 08:45:55 am
The only way you move Castro off SS is because you just traded for a better one or one in the system is ready.

I agree with JR that Barney hasn't looked that great at SS.

Cardenas at third might be an interesting EXPERIMENT,  but I wouldn't bet on it long term.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 01, 2012, 11:46:05 am
Why would Barney factor into any long term decisions anyway?  His OPS is back in his comfort zone, well under .700.  He's not an everyday player and likely never will be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 01, 2012, 01:03:17 pm
Why would Barney factor into any long term decisions anyway?  His OPS is back in his comfort zone, well under .700.  He's not an everyday player and likely never will be.

Oh, man... can open... worms... everywhere.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on May 01, 2012, 01:22:03 pm
Not really. It's what Barney has always done. Many seasons in the minors Barney didn't even crack .700 OPS. I appreciate the guy - he plays good 2B defense and that's worth something. But for someone with as little power as he has, he needs to draw more walks to be viable offensively. Unfortunately, just as he has historically sported a sub .700 OPS, he also historically posts below average walk rates.

If Cardenas is called up and he pushes anyone, it will be Barney. I'm hoping his defense improves to the point where that's viable, especially given the steps forward taken by Cardenas this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on May 01, 2012, 01:25:24 pm
Regarding Stewart, he has had smart at bats. His K rate is hovering near 20%. His BABIP is a comical .207. That's going to rise, and if he keeps his K-rate at this new level (plate discipline statistics stabilize near 100 PA's; Stewart is at 85 - we may be looking at a legit change in approach), Stewart will be easily above average at 3B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on May 01, 2012, 01:36:26 pm
Yeah I agree.  Leave the guy at short.  It's still way too early to be discussing moving him off of there.

Even with his lapses in the field, all-around offensively and defensively he's still a decidedly above average player at short.
LEAVE CASTRO ALONE. He will eventually cut down on his errors but it'll never happen if you start moving him around. The only way you move him (like Curt said) is if you have someone better to put out there. And we don't right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 01, 2012, 01:47:35 pm
I got the feeling that the Cubs wanted to start Cardenas at second to start the season, but he hit so poorly that they had little choice but to send him to Iowa.  I think that is why they brought in Valbuena to the system.  I never got the feeling that the Cubs were in love with Barney.

However, for the most part, Barney has brought excellent defense and his hitting was not a black hole, as we have often had in the past.  I suspect that the moment that the scouts think that Cardenas will produce, he will be brought up, and Barney benched.

Cardenas seems to be a hitter similar to Clevenger.  He gets a fair number of walks and doesn't strike out a lot.  And in addition, he hits left handed, which seems to count with this administration.  The few reports I have heard on his defense is that it is not great, but nor is it a weakness.

Another option is Valbuena.  He is also left handed, and also walks a fair amount.  He also strikes out more than Cardenas, but perhaps balances that with more power.  But he has been considered to be a detriment on defense, especially at second base, so unless they are looking for a replacement for Stewart, I think that Cardenas will get the first crack at second base.  And I suspect that, with Stewart hitting into horrible luck, they are likely to stick with him for a while.

Or, of course, they can try to trade for Flaherty.  His 33% Strike out rate and his 190 OBA should fit right in with the team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 01, 2012, 01:52:39 pm
Regarding Stewart, he has had smart at bats. His K rate is hovering near 20%. His BABIP is a comical .207. That's going to rise, and if he keeps his K-rate at this new level (plate discipline statistics stabilize near 100 PA's; Stewart is at 85 - we may be looking at a legit change in approach), Stewart will be easily above average at 3B.

Also keep in mind that Stewart's historic K rate (I think it's around 27%-28%) is suppressed by playing most of his career in Denver, where K rates are lower.  His historic K rate away from Coors is somewhere around 31%.  If he keeps his K rate down where it is now (21%), he's going to get hot at some point and have a pretty good year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on May 01, 2012, 01:54:58 pm
I hope to see Stewart at 3B for most of the year. He plays great defense, has good patience, and solid power. If his K-rate is normalizing at a level below his career norms, we could have a solid, above avg (if unspectacular) 3Bman for years to come.

"However, for the most part, Barney has brought excellent defense and his hitting was not a black hole, as we have often had in the past."

His hitting WAS a black hole last year, and it is a black hole this year. A .296 wOBA (his mark last year and this) is simply unacceptable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2012, 01:57:23 pm
Anybody think Luis Valbuena is a more interesting AAAA waiver claim than Cardenas?

I don't know anything about Valbuena's defense, but he's been a lot better hitter than Cardenas in Triple-A in his career and isn't hitting too badly for Iowa himself.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 01, 2012, 02:14:37 pm
As long as pointing out that Barney not being an everyday player opens a "can of worms" the Cubs will never be a serious organization.  We need to break out of the mindset that guys like him are acceptable alternatives as starters.  if his offense isn't a black hole, I don't want whose is.  Is our threshold so low that "not an embarrassment" constitutes a ringing endorsement?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 01, 2012, 02:20:52 pm
Barney hit 263 with an OBA at 313.  If you call that a black hole, what do you call Neifi's 253/260 in 2006?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 01, 2012, 02:37:39 pm
More of a black hole?  But I don't know why the fact that the Cubs have played worse players in the past should have any impact on whether or not Barney plays now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2012, 03:09:56 pm
Barney's basically a cheap antiawful guy until someone better comes along.  Unfortunately no one else better has arrived yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 01, 2012, 03:13:55 pm
Barney's basically a cheap antiawful guy until someone better comes along.  Unfortunately no one else better has arrived yet.

Ed Zachary.  And has been said, we got much worse problems.  I'd like to see him replaced when we're ready to make a move, because it means a lot more important areas have been fixed.  JMO
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 01, 2012, 03:15:09 pm
Again, if we have a lot more important problems than a .650 OPS player at 2B, that just says how awful we truly are.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2012, 03:21:29 pm
I'd like to see him replaced when we're ready to make a move, because it means a lot more important areas have been fixed.  JMO

Yeah basically the big problem is that unfortunately Barney is not the worst regular in the lineup.  We've had worse players than Darwin Barney at LF, 3B, and C so far this year, and we're playing someone in CF right now who is roughly the same caliber of hitter.

When Barney starts being clearly the worst player in the lineup or obviously one of the worst, I'm sure he'll get more attention as someone who needs to be replaced.  Kind of tough to really focus on Darwin Barney as a huge problem when he's unfortunately the 4th or 5th best regular in the lineup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 01, 2012, 03:23:11 pm
It doesn't.  But in order to communicate, we have to understand what each is saying.

Barney is not a good player.  But neither is he an horrible one.  If we have someone better, we should play the better player.  But Barney is not the weak link on the team, in my opinion. The bull pen is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 01, 2012, 03:43:56 pm
Stewart will likely hit better next year, after his wrist injury has healed as much as it ever will.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 01, 2012, 04:18:00 pm
Just FWIW, Fangraphs has an xBABIP calculator, which calculates what a player's BABIP would be based on how well he has hit the ball (LD%, GB%, FB%, etc).  It's not perfect, but over enough PA does a pretty good job estimating.  Currently, Stewart's xBABIP is .335, a full 128 points higher than his actual BABIP.  He has hit into a ton of bad luck. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 01, 2012, 06:08:21 pm
His numbers (Stewart) are the result of someone who cant hit. 1300+ ABs w/ an obp of .319.  And this from a guy who spent his career in Colorado.

You might be right.

But this season is not about winning games.  It is about building value.  If Stewart does in fact come around, he will have considerable value.  The changes you suggest might win a couple more games (though I doubt it), but they would not do much to help the Cubs build value.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 01, 2012, 06:13:12 pm
Also keep in mind that Stewart's historic K rate (I think it's around 27%-28%) is suppressed by playing most of his career in Denver, where K rates are lower.  His historic K rate away from Coors is somewhere around 31%.  If he keeps his K rate down where it is now (21%), he's going to get hot at some point and have a pretty good year.

Just as it is reasonable to think that Stewart's extremely low BABIP rate, far lower than his career average or the league average, is the result of small sample size, isn't it reasonable to assume that the sharp decline in his K rate is the result of the same thing?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 01, 2012, 06:24:09 pm
Anybody think Luis Valbuena is a more interesting AAAA waiver claim than Cardenas?

I don't know anything about Valbuena's defense, but he's been a lot better hitter than Cardenas in Triple-A in his career and isn't hitting too badly for Iowa himself.

Valbuena is 26.  Cardenas is 24, two four years younger.  That alone is enough to make him more interesting to me.  Valbuena has hit quite well in the minors for a middle infielder -- .303/.389/.467/.855 in more than 1,000 AB.

But in more than 800 major league PA he has hit .226 with an OPS of .650, which is some indication that he has trouble at the major league level.  Cardenas has never played in the majors, which means he has not yet shown he could play there or would have similar problems there.

When you have some degree of demonstrated failure compared to an entirely untested performance, I am more interested in the entirely untested performance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 01, 2012, 07:14:37 pm
When Valbuena was picked up, the comments I read were that he was quite poor defensively.  I don't remember who said it, so I have no idea how valid that is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2012, 08:54:07 pm
Kirk: 8-5-2-2-2-4

Szczur in 3rd spot: 0-5, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_01_clrafa_dbcafa_1


Peoria off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on May 01, 2012, 09:07:37 pm
Brett Jackson has 4 hits thru the first 5 innings in Memphis tonight...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2012, 09:12:23 pm
Kirk: 8-5-2-2-2-4

It sure would be nice if we found out Kirk's stuff improved by a notch or two this year.  He's still only striking out 1 guy every other inning, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2012, 09:28:26 pm
Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_01_monaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2012, 10:30:51 pm
Jackson: 4-5, 2 2B, 2 RBI, K

Sappelt: 3-6, 2B, HR, 2 RBI



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_01_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 01, 2012, 11:28:06 pm
Who cares about the 4-5?  It's another strikeout that matters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 01, 2012, 11:47:21 pm
Right.  He reduced his strikeout rate in that game to about 18%
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2012, 01:56:06 am
EST:

Baez: 0-3, 2 K

Vogelbach: 0-2, BB, K

Dunston: 2-3, SB

Whitenack: 3-0-0-0-1-2

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/05/01/bianco-blast-difference-maker-talking-stick
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 02, 2012, 04:21:54 am
Cardenas went 3-5 in that Iowa game ... if you're not interested in moving Castro and Barney around .... than at least bring him up and platoon him w/ Barney.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 02, 2012, 09:04:23 am
I know a slow little contact hitter isn't your prototype left fielder.  But given that we've got no offense in LF anyway, or defense, I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to find out how awful Cardenas might be in the outfield.  His future bench potential would be better if he can play several spots.  And right now, he could probably upgrade on Sosa tomorrow.  Not exactly an exciting long-term solution for LF.  But if he can hit, it would be progress. 

Of course we want guys who show some HR-power.  But as we've seen with no-HR Clevenger, sometimes a good hitter who gives good at-bats is more welcome than a HR-hitter who isn't hitting any HR's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 02, 2012, 09:40:33 am
I might be going out on a limb here, but something tells me even if we called up Cardenas, he probably won't be saving this season for the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 02, 2012, 10:38:18 am
I can't think of a single argument for keeping DeWitt on the roster.  He is a below average second baseman, and is hitting 120. 

Whether he is replaced by Cardenas or by Valbuena, DeWitt should go.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 02, 2012, 12:11:35 pm
The Smokies finally have a backup to C Mike Brenly.  Luis Flores has been activated from the restricted list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 02, 2012, 12:17:13 pm
Luis Flores has been activated from the restricted list.

That guy must have some talent, considering how much nonsense they've put up with from him. 

I'm kind of halfway interested in seeing what he could do if the Cubs would put him in the lineup every day and if he can lay off whatever drugs he's been using.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 02, 2012, 02:57:17 pm
He is supposed to be a great defensive catcher, with an arm to match Castillo, and power potential.  The question seems to be, will he make enough contact to be a starter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2012, 06:16:15 pm
Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_02_clrafa_dbcafa_1


Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_02_monaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2012, 06:45:36 pm
EST:

Baez: 2-5, HR, RBI, SB, K

Candelario: 2-3, 2 2B, 2 RBI, SB, K, E

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/05/02/cubs-rally-edge-fitch-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2012, 08:50:35 pm
Francescon: 7-6-3-3-3-5, (3-run homer in 3rd only blemish)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_02_peoafx_kccafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2012, 09:31:00 pm
Jackson: 0-4, K

Rizzo: 1-3, 2B, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_02_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 03, 2012, 01:20:32 pm
Josh Vitters has finally hit his first homer of the season.   Iowa leads Memphis 6-2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 03, 2012, 01:27:56 pm
Josh Vitters has finally hit his first homer of the season.   Iowa leads Memphis 6-2

I think we're at the point where we can at least acknowledge that Vitters isn't likely ever going to be a star.

Still, he's not embarrassing himself too badly at Iowa so far, and 22 years old is still very young for Triple-A.  If he gets parked at Iowa for a couple of years, maybe by time he's 25, he could be a very productive Triple-A hitter and emerge as a respectable 1B/LF/DH type prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 03, 2012, 01:29:14 pm
Vitters=LaHair?      Nah
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on May 03, 2012, 02:01:45 pm
To be honest, I was a bit surprised Vitters started out at AAA this yr...its going to take him some time to gain some consistent, positive production. Playing at AAA this and next yr might be what it takes. He's young
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2012, 05:21:28 pm
Vitters will be 23 in three months. Not old by any means but not particularly young either.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_03_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 03, 2012, 05:51:23 pm
Well, Vitters will be 22 virtually the entire AAA season.  That's young for the level.

It's a month into the season.  Let's see what he does in terms of power and defense as the season unfolds.  Still too early to know what he will become, although highly unlikely he will be a star.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2012, 06:10:08 pm
Quote
Let's see what he does in terms of power and defense as the season unfolds.

Just power and defense? None of his stats are any good. He's hitting in the .250s in the PCL with 4 ex-base hits. He's drawn 5 walks and none over his last 65 at-bats, and has 5 errors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on May 03, 2012, 07:02:56 pm
Vitters holds no interest for me as a prospect.  I'm sure glad we didn't waste that pick on Wieters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on May 03, 2012, 07:18:03 pm
Still too early to know what he will become, although highly unlikely he will be a star.



The world needs ditch diggers too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 03, 2012, 07:50:17 pm
Just power and defense? None of his stats are any good. He's hitting in the .250s in the PCL with 4 ex-base hits. He's drawn 5 walks and none over his last 65 at-bats, and has 5 errors.

Not too concerned about vitters hitting for average or hitting doubles in the majors.  If he can stay at 3b and hit for home run power and play defense, he will be an asset---even with modest obp due to the low walks. 

Not his fault that Wilken passed on wieters. Some folks (me too) will never get over that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 03, 2012, 08:31:31 pm
Hayden Simpson pitched in relief today.  4 innings, 1 hit, 0 runs, 0 walks, 4 strike outs.

Time to move him up to replace Marmol as closer?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2012, 08:47:52 pm
Szczur: 0-3, SB, BB, K

Simpson: 4-1-0-0-0-4

Zych: 2-3-2-2-0-3, WP, HB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_03_clrafa_dbcafa_1


DeVoss: 0-5, 4 K

Hernandez: 1-4, RBI, 2 K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_03_peoafx_kccafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 03, 2012, 09:00:04 pm
Maybe he's found his niche.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2012, 09:29:43 pm
McNutt: 2-2/3 -2-5-2-2-1


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_03_monaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 03, 2012, 09:34:49 pm
When Trey McNutt is your top pitching prospect, that is not a good sign.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 03, 2012, 10:48:42 pm
McNutt is on a strict pitch count, and hasn't gone five innings yet to qualify for a win, so an 0-2 record should be no surprise. His ERA is 1.56.

I wonder how Pin-Chieh Chen feels about batting ninth for Peoria. Chen's hitting .297, tied with Zapata for the highest average on the team. Marco Hernandez and his .119 BA is hitting eighth.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 04, 2012, 05:09:53 am
Not sure if this is good news or just depressing:

Quote
"I got into a real walking bug there," Simpson said. "I was overthinking everything. I'd be sitting thinking about all the 'What if?' questions. So my pitching coach [Marty Mason] and I really focused during my bullpen session on attacking strike zone more. I didn't really change much to be honest with you. It was mostly me getting out of my own head."

Concerns over his fastball velocity had also chased Simpson throughout the early years of his professional career.

....

The four-seamer touched 90 on the gun Thursday, according to Simpson. But the hurler noted that his reliance on his sinker -- a pitch not known for its velocity -- should soften the concerns about the speed of his fastball. Nonetheless, he added he has regained all of the weight he had previously lost and his health is better than it has been in years.

"I feel good," Simpson said. "My arm feels really feels really well. I'm still working to get my strength back, so that's still a process I'm going through. But the difference between last year and this year [health-wise], it's night and day.

"I felt like I pitched in college. Now I've just got to trust the system, trust the process and execute it when I get out there."


http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120503&content_id=30347736&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 04, 2012, 08:25:28 am
What do you find depressing about that?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 04, 2012, 08:47:09 am
McNutt is on a strict pitch count, and hasn't gone five innings yet to qualify for a win . . .

McNutt has been on a strict pitch count for over two years now, though.

The 1.69 ERA is definitely nice, and he could be a good reliever down the road.  I still don't think it speaks well for a system's pitching situation when your top prospect only pitches 2 to 4 innings at a time and is starting to look like a relief prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 04, 2012, 09:02:39 am
Regarding Simpson, P2, he says his weight is back and health is good but he can only touch 90 on his 4-seam fastball. Didn't Wilken et al claim he maintained mid-90s fastballs late into games in college? Touching 90 at best is "depressing" compared to throwing 96 in the 7th inning or whatever. But maybe later in the summer he'll increase velocity too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 04, 2012, 09:50:14 am
I think it does speak well of a system when it is more concerned with development of its prospects while also keeping them healthy than with meeting some arbitrary standard of what fans might think looks good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 04, 2012, 10:31:34 am
Unless, of course, I am that fan.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 04, 2012, 10:11:13 pm
Rizzo: 2-4, 2B

Vitters: 0-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_04_nozaaa_iowaaa_1


Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_04_monaax_tenaax_1

Hernandez: 2-4, 3B, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_04_peoafx_kccafx_1


Is Zach Cates supposed to be a good prospect or something?


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_04_jupafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 05, 2012, 12:08:41 am
Blake Parker (1-0, 0.87) looks like a pitcher to keep an eye on as he gets a few more innings under his belt at Iowa.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=453284
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 05, 2012, 07:09:54 am
Vitters: 0-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_04_nozaaa_iowaaa_1

Though it would be extremely hard NOT to worry about Vitters (.247/.286/.318/.603), there are reasons to still hold out some hope.

1) He is still only 22.  Certainly he seems to have been around forever and it seems as if he has to be getting old for his league, but he is not.  He only turns 23 in August.  (Pitcher Blake Parker who Cactus just commented favorably on is just a month and a half short of 27, and is in his fourth season as AAA.)

2) He has shown difficultly initially adapting to EVERY new level.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=vitter002jos

3) He is supposedly trying to be working on something new at the plate (going deeper into the count and drawing more walks?  I will admit that it is hard to keep track with Vitters).

4) This is his first season at Iowa.

The impression most have had of Vitters appears to be that he simply is not very bright, and that would be consistent with what we have seen with his performance and his development.  He simply does not appear to learn quickly.  That still does not mean he can not make the majors, can not contribute at the majors, can not be a cornerstone player (though for a shorter period of time if he doesn't make it until he is 26), or even make an All Star team or two.

It also means that while he probably should not yet be written off, we shouldn't count very heavily on him at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 05, 2012, 11:39:10 am
Gerardo Concepcion makes the BA Not-So Hot Sheet.

Gerardo Concepcion, lhp, Cubs: The Cubs gave Concepcion a rather stunning five-year major league deal worth $6 million in March, a move that was widely derided throughout the international scouting community. While the deal was seen as a significant overpay, Concepcion at least figured to be able to handle the low minors without much issue due to his success in Cuba's Serie Nacional at a young age. Instead, the 20-year-old's first two low Class A Peoria starts have resulted in 12 rus in 5 2/3 innings, including a start this week in which he couldn't even get out of the first. Concepcion is throwing strikes, but he's also struck out just two of the 32 batters he's faced, a pattern consistent with his middling strikeout rate in Cuba with a very hittable fastball that sits in the high 80s.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 05, 2012, 07:20:45 pm
Concepcion has given up 2 runs with one out in the first.

Sounds bad.  But after a strikeout, there was an infield single that should have been played by DeVoss, an error and another infield single that should have been played by DeVoss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 05, 2012, 07:25:43 pm
Then a walk, a ground single and a fly out followed by an error.  Followed by a blooper single to make it 6 - 0.

And then I turned off the radio.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 05, 2012, 10:12:28 pm
Jackson: 1-5, 2B, 4 K

Rizzo: 1-3, 2B, RBI, BB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_05_nozaaa_iowaaa_1


Rhee: 6 IP, 3 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_05_monaax_tenaax_1


Szczur: 3-5, 2 2B

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_05_jupafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 05, 2012, 10:19:14 pm
Concepcion: 1-6-7-2-1-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_05_peoafx_qcsafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 05, 2012, 11:06:08 pm
Concepcion is definitely looking like Theo's first major flop.

I really wonder if Fleita and his staff are going to survive that signing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 05, 2012, 11:52:44 pm
They might wait more than 3 games before making a judgement.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 06, 2012, 12:09:10 am
Daniel Berlind, whose 13.50 ERA at Tennessee earned him a promotion to Iowa, gave up four runs in one third of an inning giving him an Iowa ERA of 108.00

Randy Wells pitched four scoreless innings and then gave up three runs in the fifth.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 06, 2012, 09:55:44 am
From Bleacher Nation's daily Down On The Farm report:

Low A – Peoria Chiefs. 11 – 18
This was as ugly a game as we are likely to see this season. Peoria got blown out by a final score of 20-5.

Gerardo Concepcion is going to get most of the blame for this loss, but that’s not exactly accurate. He did pitch just one inning, and he did give up seven runs (three earned) on six hits and a walk while striking out two, but he had no help from his defense. Twice there were errors that let the inning keep going. Concepcion should have been able to limit the damage after those errors, but it is also true that he should not have been in that position. It wasn’t a good game for Concepcion, but it wasn’t as bad as it looks.

After Concepcion left things did not get any better. Wellington Cruz gave up seven more runs (all earned), Yao-Lin Wang gave up four, and Andrew McKirahan couldn’t find the strike zone on the way to giving up two more runs (despite not allowing a hit) before finally Jeffrey Lorick had a scoreless appearance.

The best Chiefs’ pitcher was first baseman Ryan Cuneo who pitched the ninth. That pretty much summarizes how this game went for Peoria.

Paul Hoilman had a triple; that was Peoria’s only extra base hit in this game. Ryan Cuneo, Taiwan Easterling, and Zeke DeVoss all had two hits.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 06, 2012, 10:24:36 am
Daniel Berlind, whose 13.50 ERA at Tennessee earned him a promotion to Iowa, gave up four runs in one third of an inning giving him an Iowa ERA of 108.00

He's expecting the callup to Wrigley any day now....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 06, 2012, 10:25:42 am
They might wait more than 3 games before making a judgement.

Absurd.

The Theocracy needs to listen to sports radio call-in programs, or simply check in here every day, to decide what moves to make.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 06, 2012, 01:44:25 pm
Jonathan Mota moves from Tennessee to Iowa and Junior Lake takes his place with the Smokies
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 06, 2012, 02:02:33 pm
Daniel Berlind, whose 13.50 ERA at Tennessee earned him a promotion to Iowa, gave up four runs in one third of an inning giving him an Iowa ERA of 108.00

Randy Wells pitched four scoreless innings and then gave up three runs in the fifth.
Berlind has been released.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 06, 2012, 04:47:07 pm
Jackson: 2-3, HR, RBI, BB, K

Rizzo: 0-2, 2 BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_06_nozaaa_iowaaa_1


Jensen: 4-1/3 IP, 5 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_06_peoafx_qcsafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 06, 2012, 09:39:05 pm
Kirk: 7-6-2-2-0-3

Szczur: 1-4, SB, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_06_jupafa_dbcafa_1

Lake: 2-4, 2B, 3B, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_06_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 07, 2012, 12:29:34 am
As appalling as the umpiring is at the major-league level, it upsets me that MLB only uses two-man crews for A ball and three-man crews for AA ball. More jobs for minor league umpires should lead to more qualified candidates for MLB jobs. And any serious baseball fan could name enough incompetent umpires at the MLB level to save the teams enough money to replace them with competent minor league umpires and pay the extra minor league umpires. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 07, 2012, 12:21:19 pm
Matt Szczur has 16 steals.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 07, 2012, 12:38:39 pm
Hak-Ju Lee has 6 SB in 131 AB.  6 errors. 

Chris Archer has 23 walks in 30 IP in his 3rd year in AA. 

Robinson Chirinos is on the 60-day DL, after OPSing .719 last season in AAA.

Brandon Guyer is hitting .294 with 3 HR in AAA. 


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on May 07, 2012, 12:45:04 pm
Archer and Guyer (at least) are atypical examples of the Cubs selling "high" (at peak value).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 07, 2012, 12:50:22 pm
Hak-Ju Lee has 6 SB in 131 AB.  6 errors. 

Chris Archer has 23 walks in 30 IP in his 3rd year in AA. 

Robinson Chirinos is on the 60-day DL, after OPSing .719 last season in AAA.

Brandon Guyer is hitting .294 with 3 HR in AAA. 



But Lee's OPS is up over .600 now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 07, 2012, 12:56:21 pm
Lee's still guaranteed to be a multi-time All-Star, though.  That was true when he was in Low-A, so it still must be true now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 07, 2012, 01:36:05 pm
Casey Coleman has Iowa's only hit (a double) in a scoreless game after seven with New Orleans
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 07, 2012, 01:47:42 pm
Coleman's got 17 K's over his last 15 innings. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 07, 2012, 01:56:07 pm
Brett Jackson walked and then scored on a balk in the bottom of the eighth.  Iowa leads 1-0 with NO batting in the ninth.  Scott Maine is now pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 07, 2012, 02:21:12 pm
Lee's still guaranteed to be a multi-time All-Star, though.  That was true when he was in Low-A, so it still must be true now.

In fairness, Lee may turn out to be a really, really good major leaguer. But it seems clear that he also may not.  He is still young but he sure has struggled mightily at AA (256 AB, .216 BA, .282 OBP, .316 SLG, .598 OPS) so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 07, 2012, 02:52:26 pm
Brett Jackson walked to leadoff the eighth, reached third on Josh Vitters’ single, and scored on a balk call for the Iowa Cubs only run in a 1-0 victory over New Orleans on Monday. Scott Maine picked up the win in relief, throwing two scoreless innings. He walked one and struck out one. Casey Coleman started and gave up two hits over seven scoreless innings, striking out nine.

– Carrie Muskat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2012, 02:54:06 pm
Jackson was in the 5-spot behind Rizzo.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_07_nozaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2012, 02:56:50 pm
Hoilman: 3-4, GS, 5 RBI, BB, K  ( .341, 1.045 OPS last 10 games )

Francescon: 6-3-4-2-3-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_07_peoafx_qcsafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 07, 2012, 02:57:24 pm
C Juan Apodaca was scratched from the I-Cubs lineup before the game.  Probably has a minor injury, right?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2012, 08:42:51 pm

Szczur: 3-4, 2B, RBI

Jokisch: 7-4-0-0-0-11


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_07_jupafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 07, 2012, 09:07:42 pm
After a horrible, horrible start, Ceasar is coming along nicely.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 07, 2012, 09:14:58 pm
I thought so too, but then I saw he had an obp below .300 in the last 10 games.

As I wrote before, he's just been destroyed by lefties.  Against righties, his obp is above .400.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 07, 2012, 09:22:31 pm
Fortunately, two thirds of the pitchers are right handed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 07, 2012, 10:27:02 pm
A not so great comment from AzPhil regarding Baez:

"I really haven't noticed any change in general hitting philosophy related to Cubs hitters at EXST trying to be more selective or patient. Most of them are aggressive hackers, just like every year.

And the most extreme example is Javier Baez.

In 97 Plate Appearances between AZL Cubs, Boise, and AZ Instructs last season, and Extended Spring Training this year, Javier Baez has NO WALKS, and 29 strikeouts. The strikeouts are somewhat understandable because he is a big-time power hitter with extraordinary bat speed, but NO WALKS? In 97 Plate Appearances? In other words, his next walk will be his first walk."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2012, 10:49:24 pm
Struck: 6 IP, 2 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_07_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 08, 2012, 09:59:15 am
We've all realized that Baez whiffs a lot, and I'd noticed that he never seems to walk.  I hadn't realized it was 0/97, or 27K/0BB ratio.  Yuck.   

I wonder if Szczur may be going through some "try patience" adjustment.  Often a hacker tries to get more patient, which results in more walks, but sometimes comes at the expense of hitting and/or power.  After a while they often give up, and go back to hacking.  WE've seen this with Colvin, Vitters, Corey, Barney, Ha, etc..  A guy gives it a shot for a couple of weeks, and then goes back. 

Sometimes the "try patience" thing means taking more pitches.  Instead of hitting 1st-pitch fastball strike, they whiff on the 2-strike curveball.  Or they go into "guess hitting" mode.  Frequently what helps the walks hurts the hitting, and the guy goes back to a fewer-walks-more-agressive-hitting compromise. 

Szczur took 13 walks in first 80 AB, but didn't hit well.  Now he's hitting, but he's taken 2 walks in his last 43 AB.  Could be that in time he'll find some happy medium, and be able to do both at the same time.  But lots of guys can't. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 08, 2012, 09:54:53 pm
Rizzo with a 3-run bomb in the 1st!   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 08, 2012, 11:09:59 pm
Rizzo with ANOTHER 3-run jack...now has 9 HRs, 31 RBIs!

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 08, 2012, 11:21:12 pm
Simpson: 4-5-3-2-1-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_08_dbcafa_chaafa_1


Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_08_tenaax_biraax_1


Chiefs:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_08_peoafx_qcsafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 09, 2012, 12:51:47 am
Jackson: 1-3, 3B, 2 BB, 2 K, SB

Rizzo: 2-5, 2 HR, 6 RBI

Vitters: 3-5, 2B, HR, 4 RBI

Rusin: 6-3-1-1-2-5


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_08_iowaaa_freaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 09, 2012, 12:53:38 am
If I understood Brenley correctly, Hoilman, the kid with tremendous power but a 33% strike out rate and poor contact, now has a 22 game hitting streak.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 09, 2012, 01:09:19 am
Rizzo is still getting owned by lefties.  I'm alright with him spending most of the year in Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 09, 2012, 12:10:26 pm
Or, if they bring him up, perhaps they should platoon him with Baker. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 09, 2012, 12:50:08 pm
Rizzo's hitting .257 with 2 HR against LHP, so they've hardly "owned" him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 09, 2012, 12:52:24 pm
Incidentally, B-Jax has a 1.255 OPS against lefties.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 09, 2012, 01:33:26 pm
Rizzo's obp against lefties is .297.  If that's not being owned by lefties, than its certainly rent to own.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 09, 2012, 01:53:40 pm
Rizzo's overall OBA is higher than 400.  I think they could live with the 297 against lefties.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 09, 2012, 02:22:15 pm
NL lefty hitters have a .294 obp vs. lefty pitchers this season.  Not a big deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 09, 2012, 04:17:00 pm
I'm guessing if his obp is sub .300 against lefties in the PCL, it will be worse in the majors.  Obviously its nitpicking given his overall numbers, but if McLeod can argue he wasnt ready last year after he destroyed the PCL, I dont see how you can say he's ready now.  Call him up in September and go from there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 09, 2012, 04:33:26 pm
The way Soriano is playing, I would like to see LaHair move to right and DeJesus move to CF when Rizzo is brought up.  Campana can give any of them a breather now and then and come in for defense late.   Best would still be to move Sori, but doubtful it will happen.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 09, 2012, 04:49:42 pm
My guess is that Rizzo will be up sometime in late June or July, along with Jackson, if he performs well.  I doubt that Rizzo will have to wait until September, but if he does, fine.  He won't be a difference maker.

I think one reason why they ruled out Rizzo breaking with the team in April is that they wanted to give LaHair a fair shot at showing what he can do without the constant din from reporters and SCR talk show hosts sensing blood in the water.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 09, 2012, 05:02:47 pm
Dave, Dave, Dave.  Rizzo has to come up sooner or he won't be eligible for the playoffs and Series.  Sheesh.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 09, 2012, 05:12:00 pm
Dave, Dave, Dave.  Rizzo has to come up sooner or he won't be eligible for the playoffs and Series.  Sheesh.

Actually, that's not entirely true.

He could take the place of any position player on the disabled list and still be eligible for the playoffs as long as he is in the organization by September 1st.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 09, 2012, 05:25:39 pm
Oh, good point.

Didn't the Yankees or someone pull that in the last couple years?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 09, 2012, 05:28:12 pm
Oh, good point.

Didn't the Yankees or someone pull that in the last couple years?

I think the best example was when the Angels brought up K-Rod for the 2002(?) post-season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 09, 2012, 05:34:13 pm
Besides, the Cubs are just as likely to go to the series without Rizzo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 09, 2012, 08:55:42 pm
Rizzo hit his 2nd 3-run bomb off a lefty last night!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 09, 2012, 08:57:24 pm
OK, I'll go ahead and say it.

Call him up!!!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 09, 2012, 09:23:42 pm
Tennesse, Daytona and Peoria combined to score, like, minus 5 runs. Seriously, does this org know you have to score to win games?


Hoilman: 2-4, 3B, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_09_belafx_peoafx_1


Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_09_dbcafa_chaafa_1


Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_09_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 09, 2012, 09:38:22 pm
Tennesse, Daytona and Peoria combined to score, like, minus 5 runs. Seriously, does this org know you have to score to win games?

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_09_tenaax_biraax_1

I'm sure this is something Theo et al had never considered.  You should write to them and enlighten them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 09, 2012, 10:00:33 pm
Nelson Perez now has 22 walks this year. Last year he set his pro career high with 26 walks. So, for the year he is at .320/.435/.590/1025

Sure he's in his 3rd go around in High A. And he's approximately 53 years old. But good for him anyhow. When he goes up to AA hopefully he can maintain that plate discipline.  4 years from now he then might have a LaHarian chance of being an overnight sensation in MLB after thousands of minor leage at bats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 09, 2012, 11:45:21 pm
Quote
You should write to them and enlighten them.


The thought hadn't crossed my mind until you said something.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 09, 2012, 11:50:41 pm
It might be time to send Zack Cates (0-5, 10.55) down to Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 10, 2012, 12:10:47 am
Rizzo at it again tonight...2-run bomb (#10) to lead a 6-run 8th inning rally to enable Iowa to take a lead over Fresno.

Oh, and he has 2 more walks, too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 10, 2012, 12:31:55 am
Just think what he'll do with DeWitt in the lineup to protect him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 10, 2012, 12:46:39 am
From tonight's Iowa box score

Iowa Top of the 4th
Matt Tolbert grounds out, second baseman Charlie Culberson to first baseman Todd Linden.
Blake Lalli grounds out, shortstop Nick Noonan to first baseman Todd Linden.
Offensive Substitution: Pinch hitter Randy Wells replaces Rodrigo Lopez.
Randy Wells grounds out, shortstop Nick Noonan to first baseman Todd Linden.

Iowa has only eleven position players on it's roster
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 10, 2012, 01:19:07 am
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_09_iowaaa_freaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 10, 2012, 06:40:54 am
For Curts enjoyment, Rizzo is hitting .280 on balls-not-in-play. 

Jackson is hitting .070 on balls-not-in-play, which make up 1/3 of his AB.

One of them has a higher overall average.   

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 10, 2012, 06:48:30 am
Just don't bring up BABIP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 10, 2012, 07:19:35 am
Rizzo is just a AAAA player (like LaHair).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 10, 2012, 07:23:14 am
Rizzo is just a AAAA player (like LaHair).

Bingo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 10, 2012, 08:04:18 am
Offensive Substitution: Pinch hitter Randy Wells replaces Rodrigo Lopez.
Randy Wells grounds out, shortstop Nick Noonan to first baseman Todd Linden.

Iowa has only eleven position players on it's roster

That's pretty standard for Triple-A. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 10, 2012, 08:39:44 am
In 118 ABs, Rizzo has 10 HR, 6 2B, 33 RBIs...356 BA, .420 OBP, .661 SLG, 1.081 OPS.

In 122, Jackson has .246 BA, .350 OBP and 12 XBHs...he's doing ok...one hot streak and his numbers start looking pretty good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 10, 2012, 08:55:33 am
Yesterday, LaHair's game-winning hit was scalded into left field...he let the ball come in to him and hammered it where it was pitched.  Didn't try to pull it (which wouldn't have worked).

According to the bleed cubbie blue reporter, who was in Fresno last night, Rizzo hit a "monster opposite field shot in the 8th."

Part of the reason I'm so excited about the direction of this franchise is that our new leadership is clearly going after LH hitters who are patient and will take RHs the other way on outside stuff...and have the bat speed to hammer inside pitches, too.   This is HUGE as there are FAR more RH pitchers. 

IF we can field LH hitters who can, to at least some extent, negate the breaking stuff of RH pitchers with their plate discipline and skills, it will go a VERY long way to providing a much better Cub offense than we've had for, well, decades...which would be most welcome!

It's not going to happen overnight, but I love the new direction.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 10, 2012, 09:00:51 am
That's pretty standard for Triple-A. 
Of the sixteen PCL teams, only Iowa, Memphis, and Salt Lake have eleven position players.  When the DH is in use, and you don't want to burn your backup catcher, that leaves a manager only one possible move.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 10, 2012, 09:21:53 am
Of the sixteen PCL teams, only Iowa, Memphis, and Salt Lake have eleven position players.  When the DH is in use, and you don't want to burn your backup catcher, that leaves a manager only one possible move.

Working with short benches isn't an uncommon thing in Triple-A, though.  Nashville only has 12 position players, for example, and there are plenty of times when they're only working with 11.  Colorado Springs will be playing the Sounds tonight with only 11 position players.

Actually I wonder why that is.  I thought for the longest time is was because Triple-A teams work with only 24 or 23 man rosters, but it turns out they have the same full 25 man allotment that major league teams do.  I guess for major league teams, they want to make sure there is plenty of backup pitching on Triple-A rosters for whenever they need to call up an arm?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 10, 2012, 09:42:27 am

IF we can field LH hitters who can, to at least some extent, negate the breaking stuff of RH pitchers with their plate discipline and skills, it will go a VERY long way to providing a much better Cub offense than we've had for, well, decades...which would be most welcome!

Another major benefit of LH hitters being adept at hitting to the opposite field is that during the summer it's common for would-be HRs to right field to become long outs due to the wind coming off the lake.  On the other hand what would otherwise be long outs to LF can easily become wind-blown HRs on days when the wind is blowing out of the south.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 10, 2012, 10:17:44 am
In 122, Jackson has .246 BA, .350 OBP and 12 XBHs...he's doing ok...one hot streak and his numbers start looking pretty good.

You could say the same thing about Soriano.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 10, 2012, 10:22:58 am
Part of the reason I'm so excited about the direction of this franchise is that our new leadership is clearly going after LH hitters who are patient and will take RHs the other way on outside stuff...and have the bat speed to hammer inside pitches, too.   This is HUGE as there are FAR more RH pitchers. 

I also like LaHair and Rizzo, but it is WAY too early to say that the new leadership is "clearly going after LH hitters who are patient and will take RHs the other way on outside stuff."

LaHair was already with the Cubs in the majors and did well enough in September everyone but Chris would have penciled him in to start at 1B this year.  Even Hendry.

Jackson was a Hendry acquisition.

And Rizzo was simply a favorite of MaCleod's from way back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 10, 2012, 11:26:39 am
One of the reasons I have been impressed with the selection of Vogelbach is that he is reported to hit outside pitches to the opposite field rather than trying to pull everything.

Anyone watching a lot of the Cubs games this year has probably noticed how many balls are being caught this season because of their new (to the Cubs) overshift on many players.  Other teams have been doing this much more than the Cubs have, for quite a few years.  It seems to work a fairly often.

A left handed power hitter willing and able to hit to the opposite field can render this particular strategy useless, or even counter productive.  Also, when a player is willing to hit the outside pitch to the opposite field, it makes them less vulnerable to the low outside slider.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 10, 2012, 11:27:48 am
One of the reasons I have been impressed with the selection of Vogelbach is that he is reported to hit outside pitches to the opposite field rather than trying to pull everything.

Anyone watching a lot of the Cubs games this year has probably noticed how many balls are being caught this season because of their new (to the Cubs) overshift on many players.  Other teams have been doing this much more than the Cubs have, for quite a few years.  It seems to work a fairly often.

A left handed power hitter willing and able to hit to the opposite field can render this particular strategy useless, or even counter productive.  Also, when a player is willing to hit the outside pitch to the opposite field, it makes them less vulnerable to the low outside slider.
See the post I just made in "Cubs in '12"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 10, 2012, 11:32:11 am
LaHair's status went up dramatically with the new regime...Theo didn't hesitate declaring him the starter at 1B (which raised LOTS of eyebrows), whereas he was still in the minors when Hendry was canned.

Theo/Jed/McLeod went out and got Rizzo precisely because he's the kind of hitter (patient, LH, power to all fields) that's central to their offensive philosophy.

Theo has talked about the qualities these guys have as core to his offensive philosophy over and over. 

Not once did I EVER hear Jim Hendry (and/or MacPhail et al) talk about prioritizing such qualities and after YEARS and YEARS of watching their teams, they obviously didn't!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 10, 2012, 12:05:28 pm
LaHair's status went up dramatically with the new regime...Theo didn't hesitate declaring him the starter at 1B (which raised LOTS of eyebrows), whereas he was still in the minors when Hendry was canned.

Theo/Jed/McLeod went out and got Rizzo precisely because he's the kind of hitter (patient, LH, power to all fields) that's central to their offensive philosophy.

Theo has talked about the qualities these guys have as core to his offensive philosophy over and over. 

Not once did I EVER hear Jim Hendry (and/or MacPhail et al) talk about prioritizing such qualities and after YEARS and YEARS of watching their teams, they obviously didn't!

Which brings up another thought: what are the odds that LaHair would have been given a chance by Hendry's crew?  My best is zero chance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on May 10, 2012, 12:08:51 pm
Whoo!  Lot of bullshit on the BBF today!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 10, 2012, 12:30:16 pm
just today?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 10, 2012, 02:17:33 pm
As Richard Branson said years ago, "Between every good idea and its fulfillment, there is at least one dumbass saying, 'That will never work.'"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 10, 2012, 03:41:49 pm
LaHair's status went up dramatically with the new regime...Theo didn't hesitate declaring him the starter at 1B (which raised LOTS of eyebrows), whereas he was still in the minors when Hendry was canned.

Theo/Jed/McLeod went out and got Rizzo precisely because he's the kind of hitter (patient, LH, power to all fields) that's central to their offensive philosophy.

Theo has talked about the qualities these guys have as core to his offensive philosophy over and over. 

Not once did I EVER hear Jim Hendry (and/or MacPhail et al) talk about prioritizing such qualities and after YEARS and YEARS of watching their teams, they obviously didn't!

Let's be real.

Hendry would also have brought up LaHair last September.  And if LaHair had performed in September after Hendry called him up the same way he did without Hendry being the one to make that call, he would also have been give a shot at 1B this year.

It is not very realistic to contend otherwise.

As to prioritizing this or that, that is a different issue.  I responded initially here to the revisionist notion that LaHair, Jackson and Rizzo were all a result of some new emphasis by the new regime.  It is not the case.  LaHair and Jackson were Hendry acquisitions, and Jackson is not particularly doing well, and Rizzo was a particular favorite of MacLeod, who acquired him again for the Cubs when he got the chance.  Now he might be a favorite because of MaCleod's different emphasis, but he was acquired because he was a favorite and had been so before.  It is not as if the Theocracy, other than with Rizzo, have made any real moves to date reflecting their new emphasis on grinding out ABs or high OBP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 10, 2012, 09:39:24 pm
Rhee: 7-2/3 -4-1-0-1-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_10_tenaax_biraax_1

Concepcion: 4-2-2-1-5-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_10_belafx_peoafx_1


Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_10_dbcafa_chaafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 10, 2012, 10:26:58 pm
Szczur got replaced by Andreoli (sp?) in CF late in game. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 10, 2012, 11:53:56 pm
Jackson: 0-4, BB, 2 K

Rizzo: 0-3, BB, K, HBP

Vitters: 3-4, 2 2B, 2 RBI, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_10_iowaaa_freaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 11, 2012, 11:34:34 am
Paul Hoilman has extended his hitting streak to 24 games with an RBI double. The Chiefs lead 3-0 and are still batting in the first.   Hoilman now 8-for-17 in the first inning during the streak.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 11, 2012, 11:38:41 am
Paul Hoilman is about the last guy I would have ever expected to go on a streak like this.  Good for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2012, 12:08:38 pm
Agree.  He was expected to be a 240 BA 30 HR 35 % strike out guy with a lot of walks.  He still is near the strike out ratio, and his HRs are not out of line, but his walks are way down, and his BA has been out of sight.

Up til now, I haven't really taken him seriously, and one and one half months in A ball is far from career changing, but he is becoming fun to follow.

The minor league system as a whole has been pretty bad so far, except for a couple of exceptions such as Rizzo and perhaps Austin Kirk, but I am starting to see some signs of like.  Hopefully, once the EST guys get parceled out to the system, things might get interesting enough to get excited.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 11, 2012, 12:24:13 pm
If Hoilman had the kind of HR's that you'd expect for a big, strong, oldish guy in low-A, his numbers could really look good.  Pretty surprised he's got the BABIP-driven average with only 3 HR's.  Hopefully he'll get a few bunches of HR's as time goes by, and his BA/OBP/OPS will be great without needing a fabulous BABIP. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2012, 12:25:54 pm
It may be that he is deliberately trying to control his swing, and that is responsible for his BA.  But it would seem that then his strike out rate would have gone down.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 11, 2012, 12:38:17 pm
It is not out of the realm of possibility that Bryan LaHair has provided some inspiration to guys like Hoilman.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 11, 2012, 01:53:48 pm
Jensen: 5-2/3 IP, 1 R

Hernandez: 3-4, RBI  (hits in 8 of last 10)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_11_belafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on May 11, 2012, 01:55:15 pm
JR- I understand former farmhand Ebinger is living in the Goodlettsville area after he was released. Wonder what will happen for him now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2012, 02:28:19 pm
I think there is a cheese factory there where he can look for work.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 11, 2012, 02:34:57 pm
He can tend bar where everybody knows your name.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 11, 2012, 02:35:17 pm
JR- I understand former farmhand Ebinger is living in the Goodlettsville area after he was released. Wonder what will happen for him now?

I'd guess probably just get on with his life, maybe become a coach or something.  I really don't know much about him, but I can't imagine teams are jumping all over themselves to sign a 30th-something round draft pick from Lambuth who just got released.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 11, 2012, 02:35:53 pm
I think there is a cheese factory there where he can look for work.

Well at least it's not White Castle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 11, 2012, 02:36:42 pm
Fine dining.

If you're a starving rat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 11, 2012, 03:10:51 pm
Michael Jensen has some interesting numbers.  Lots of ground balls.  A real prospect?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 11, 2012, 05:16:51 pm
i may be hungry, but some white castle does sound good right about now.......
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 11, 2012, 05:45:14 pm
Ray=starved rat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 11, 2012, 05:53:50 pm
Ray=starved rat

Which is basically what they serve at White Castle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 11, 2012, 06:07:00 pm
I thought davep fed you at the White Castle?  Sort of makes you, what?  An ingrate? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2012, 06:47:48 pm
Bull.  We went to Morton's Steakhouse.  I remember standing in line watching them cook those little 2 inch steaks smothered in onions, and putting them on those little Morton's Steakhouse buns.

Damb, that's good eats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on May 11, 2012, 07:06:46 pm
I'm not sure I can recall a year with so many candidates for worst minor league pitcher.  Let's take a look at the candidates:

1) Bryce Shafer: 20H allowed in 15.1 IP.  13/11 K/W as 23 year old short-reliever in low-A.  ERA of 8.22

2) Larry Suarez: 23H allowed in 10.2 IP.  3/8 K/W. ERA of 13.5. Wow!

3) Gerardo Concepcion: 21 H allowed in 10 IP.  5/8 K/W. ERA of 12.66. Youth hurts his chances to bottom this list.
 
4) Hayden Simpson: Pitched well this past week but 35H in 26 IP, 12/16 K/W, & 6.41 ERA keeps him in contention.

5) Willengton Cruz: Late entrant after atrocious week (25.31 ERA). 35 H in 24 IP. 17/14 K/W (good for this list) and 8.39 ERA

6) Brett Wallach: 19H in 11 IP. 8/5 K/W and 8.18 ERA!

7) Zach Cates: 39H in 21 IP (can you imagine his BAA). 9/11 K/W and ERA north of 10!

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 11, 2012, 07:08:15 pm
Y'all just don't understand how lucky y'all are....no white castles in louisiana

that's probably a good thing tho, as i'd have clogged up 2 or 3 arteries by now.  Tho I guess we still do have some good eats...there is a wendy's.  We even have places that sell bugs they get out of the mud...people love mud bugs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on May 11, 2012, 07:18:56 pm
Arismendy Alcantara isn't well known but he continues to rake as a 20-year old in high-A.  Impressive 0.188 ISO with 13/15 K/W.  His stat line last week included a HR, 2 2B, 2 3B, 3 SB, 2 W, and only 3 K.

John Andreoli also continues to surprise (me at least). No power but has good eye (20/21 K/W) and some speed (7 SB).

Nelson Perez has been a fringe prospect for so long its hard to believe he is only 24.  He hit 0.500 last week with 2 HR. Strikes out too much but has 0.260 ISO.

Logan Watkins continues to look like a future major league backup.  He hit 0.438 last week in limited AB.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 11, 2012, 07:34:13 pm
Arimendy' OBP is up to .317.  He's got 16 errors in 33 games. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2012, 07:45:32 pm
Ray - where in La. do you live?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2012, 07:50:29 pm
Austin Kirk was the starting pitcher today, but as far as I can tell, he was replaced before he threw a single pitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 11, 2012, 07:52:49 pm
Nelson Perez is my guy, Dallen. I mean, I made one post about him, so he's mine (he and his shockingly improved walk rate and 1.000+ OPS). Sure, he's 24 and in Daytona, but once Rizzo gets called up to MLB, someone from Tenn will go up to Iowa and Perez will go to AA. At least that's what Nelson and I think.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 11, 2012, 08:17:34 pm
Austin Kirk was the starting pitcher today, but as far as I can tell, he was replaced before he threw a single pitch.

The perfect future Cub.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 11, 2012, 08:59:37 pm
north central louisiana...a lil town called jonesboro.  and you'd be shocked at the cubs fans within a couple hours of here.  I'd say there are more cubs fans than astros and rangers(2 closest teams) fans put together.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 11, 2012, 09:18:37 pm
Raley is a notorious no-K guy.  He's 23.  In 3 of his last 4 starts, he's gone 6, 6, and 5.1 IP with 6, 5, and 5 K's.  16K in 17.1 IP. 

Just wishful thinking, and his previous start he had 1K in 6 IP, and he's still at only 25K/42IP (11BB).  So he's not a K-guy, and almost certainly never will be. 

But I'm kind of wondering whether he's maybe got some breaking ball in development, and on days when it's working he can get a K-per-inning.  Given his control, and his left-handedness, if he was able to somehow come up with a fairly consistently effective K-pitch breaking ball, maybe he could develop into a usable major league after all. 

Not likely I know, but sometimes successful prospects do develop in unlikely and improbable ways.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2012, 09:34:58 pm
north central louisiana...a lil town called jonesboro.  and you'd be shocked at the cubs fans within a couple hours of here.  I'd say there are more cubs fans than astros and rangers(2 closest teams) fans put together.

I spent a couple of years in Schreveport.  I would think of it fondly if I hadn't met Mrs. Davep there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 11, 2012, 10:02:22 pm
I spent a couple of years in Schreveport.  I would think of it fondly if I hadn't met Mrs. Davep there.

wow, so ur wife is a louisiana girl...nothing like a southern belle.  I'm also going to go out on a limb and guess she possesses what one might call a strong will and wears the pants in the family.  lol   

It'd prolly take me about a lil less than a hour and half to get to Shreveport from where i live.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 11, 2012, 10:18:23 pm
His wife is a North Dakota girl who got lost on her way to Minnesota.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2012, 10:25:09 pm
Nope.  She is from North Dakota, (although the southern part of North Dakota).  We were both in the Air Force, stationed at Barksdale.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on May 11, 2012, 10:39:06 pm
Rizzo with number 11 tonight.  6-0 Iowa in the 5th.  Vitters also with his 3rd of the year. 

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t451&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_11_iowaaa_freaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 11, 2012, 10:40:52 pm
Rizzo needs to join the Cubs lineup, and McNutt and Maine need to join the Cubs bullpen sooner rather than later.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 11, 2012, 10:58:48 pm
McNutt is as wild as those we currently have in the pen.  If they have to bring someone up, make it Batista.  At least he is throwing strikes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2012, 03:04:51 am
Rizzo: 2-5, HR, RBI, SB, K

Vitters: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_11_iowaaa_freaaa_1

Hatley: 2-1-0-0-1-3  ( 21-7 K/BB )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_11_jacaax_tenaax_1

Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 12, 2012, 07:44:12 am
Vitters has a .961 OPS over his last 10 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 12, 2012, 07:45:05 am
Vitters is hitting .278 as a 22 year old in Triple-A and might be starting to find his power stroke.  He really can't be written off at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 09:30:59 am
Rizzo needs to join the Cubs lineup, and McNutt and Maine need to join the Cubs bullpen sooner rather than later.

Why?

To help the Cubs win the division this year?

Every decision the Cubs make regarding Rizzo this year needs to be made in order to maximize his development and his long term value to the Cubs.

Since the guy who will be making that decision is someone who appears to like Rizzo, and called him up once before before he was ready, and since the folks in the Theocracy collectively have a pretty good record of calling up players when they are ready instead of calling them up too early, and since they have better information on all of the minor league players than we do, I am more than willing to completely defer to their judgement here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 09:40:56 am
It is not out of the realm of possibility that Bryan LaHair has provided some inspiration to guys like Hoilman.

Why would Hoilman, who was only drafted last year, need inspiration from LaLair?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on May 12, 2012, 10:29:05 am
Vitters will be injured within 2 weeks (possibly a bruised ****).  When he comes back he will see his average drop into the .220s.  His slump will be blamed on the injury as anyone with a swing as beautiful as his cannot possibly be a poor hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 10:34:56 am
Vitters is currently 90th in OPS in the PCL.

90th.

Sounds terrible.

But only one of the players with a higher OPS is as young as he is.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/leader.cgi?type=bat&id=0dccdf2c

Only one.  Mike Trout, the 3rd rated prospect in all of baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2012, 11:49:49 am
Quote
But only one of the players with a higher OPS is as young as he is.

Actually two. The other being Rizzo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 12, 2012, 03:23:37 pm
Vitters is hitting .278 as a 22 year old in Triple-A and might be starting to find his power stroke.  He really can't be written off at this point.

Sure he can. In fact a number of people have already done so. (But I agree with your point)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 12, 2012, 03:40:46 pm
Sure he can. In fact a number of people have already done so. (But I agree with your point)

I'm prolly a lil more optimistic than most, but I still think Vitters can be an above average offensive player in the majors.  I think he'll need some adjustment time tho.  Hopefully, they'll give it to him if he does earn that promotion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 04:24:02 pm
Actually two. The other being Rizzo.

Sorry, but Rizzo is older.  Not much, but he is older.

My point stands that only one player younger than Vitters has a higher OPS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2012, 04:32:02 pm
Quote
Sorry, but Rizzo is older.  Not much, but he is older.

My point stands that only one player younger than Vitters has a higher OPS.

You're going to parse a 19 day age difference? Okie dokey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 04:49:50 pm
You're going to parse a 19 day age difference? Okie dokey.

No parsing involved.

Even if it is only a 19 day difference, my statement was that the only player younger than Vitters with a higher OPS is Mike Trout.

You seemed to want to dispute that.  When it is pointed out you were wrong, you object to "parsing."

Okie dokey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 12, 2012, 04:52:04 pm
Where does Vitters .313 obp percentage rank?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 05:34:47 pm
Where does Vitters .313 obp percentage rank?

In importance, his OBP ranks well behind his OPS.  If he were a speedster being groomed for a leadoff hitter role, the OBP might be the important figure, but he is not, and it is not the important figure.

On a perfectly serious note, Vitters is the second youngest hitter in the entire PCL, though to beat Chris to it, he is only a few weeks younger than Rizzo.  There are about 4 pitchers younger than Vitters in the PCL.

Somehow I doubt that the Theocracy regards Vitters as poorly as many here seem to.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 05:47:05 pm
Oh, one more point.... when Matt Weiters, the guy many here would have liked the Cubs to have taken, was the same age Vitters is, Weiters was still playing college ball.

Weiters did hit .305/.387/.890   in AAA... when he was 23.  Vitters is at .278/.313/.730 at age 21.

I wonder what Weiters would have done in AAA when he was a Sophmore in college, which I believe is when he would have been Vitter's current age (though it may have been his Junior year when he was the same age).

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 12, 2012, 05:54:14 pm
jes, Vitters is 22, not 21. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2012, 06:55:25 pm
Quote
You seemed to want to dispute that.  When it is pointed out you were wrong, you object to "parsing."


I simply relayed a fact that I thought was pertinent since it involved a Cubs prospect. Both players are 22 years old. Only you--and I mean only you--would stand by a 19-day age difference as some sort of way to differentiate the players. It doesn't matter that they're the same age and have the same amount of pro experience. What matters is that you use the most extreme minutiae possible.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2012, 06:55:34 pm
And Wieters isn't spelled the way Jes thinks it is either. Hey I can parse too!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 12, 2012, 07:02:06 pm

If Vitters hits a bunch of HR's, he's got a chance.   

His 10-day OPS is good because he hit 3 HR.  His overall OPS is at .730; those 3 HR's were worth 30 points in BA, 100 points in slugging, 130 points in OPS.  Take those 3 HR's away, and he's .600.  Double them, he's .850. 

He hit 10 HR at age 20, 14 at age 21, I'd thought 20 this year was a reasonable projection.  With his contact skill and bat speed could he eventually average 25-HR per year?  Or will he never have the strength or the wrists to be more than Barrett/DeRosa, and 10-16 will be his range?

I assume 3 things that he'll need to overcome:
1.  He'll never be an asset defensively.
2.  He'll never walk much.
3.  He'll never be a good BABIP guy.  He's been consistently low every year. 

He'll need a healthy stock of HR's to keep his BA/OBP, his slugging, and his OPS competitive.  Too soon to know whether he'll hit enough or not.  He very well might, but it could go either way. 

Vitters seems another case of hacker-tries-patience.  He tries it for a while, takes some walks, but HR's/power/average disappear.  So he gives up.  He had 5 walks in his .611-OPS April.  He's got 1 walk in his .940-OPS May. 

Hopefully it's all part of the learning process, and somehow some way he'll hit for HR-power but still become somewhat better at going with the pitch, use all fields, become less below-average average for BABIP, and lay off of more bad ones.   


Perhaps some teaching will pay off in his case. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 12, 2012, 07:04:43 pm
Anybody know what or how serious the Szczur injury is?  And anything on Kirk? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2012, 07:10:12 pm
Szczur was hit on the hand by a pitch and had to get looked at. Turns out it's just a bruise. He should be back soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 12, 2012, 07:44:27 pm
You seemed to want to dispute that.  When it is pointed out you were wrong, you object to "parsing."
Okie dokey.

The phrase you are looking for is *&$#^^*@!!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 12, 2012, 07:55:09 pm
Power is the last thing to develop for a lot of hitters.  Vitters has always projected for power, and he's flashed it on a few occasions, such as his 10 homer month or whatever it was in Peoria.

I guess my view for Vitters right now is to park him in Triple-A for a couple of years and give him time to develop his power.  There aren't really any major expectations for him anymore, so there's no need to put any pressure on him to get him to Chicago in a hurry or anything like that. 

There's also always a chance that if the power comes, so will a few more walks too.  Pitchers are a lot more likely to pitch around a guy like Vitters if he's able to hit 25-30 home runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 08:19:18 pm
jes, Vitters is 22, not 21.

Details, details.

You would think that as a college professor you would have figured out jesmath by now....

Okay, so Vitters is 22.  The comp then is what Vitters is doing in AAA at 21 with what Weiters was doing in high A and AA at 22, since that is where Weiters was then..... not quite as favorable a comparison for Vitters.

Obviously a bust.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 08:34:43 pm
Vitters seems another case of hacker-tries-patience.  He tries it for a while, takes some walks, but HR's/power/average disappear.  So he gives up.  He had 5 walks in his .611-OPS April.  He's got 1 walk in his .940-OPS May. 

Hopefully it's all part of the learning process....

Vitters learns slowly.

I suspect that has applied to nearly everything in his life.

I guess my view for Vitters right now is to park him in Triple-A for a couple of years and give him time to develop his power.

If you look at Vitters' record, EVERY level he has played at he has struggled initially.  That has been true whether he was promoted in the middle of a season, or began a season at a level. http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=vitter002jos

There aren't really any major expectations for him anymore.... 

As I have mentioned, I suspect that the Theocracy have a rather different view and expectations of him than most of us here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2012, 08:38:04 pm
Jokisch: 6-4-0-0-0-5,  (31-4 K/BB last 4 starts)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_12_breafa_dbcafa_1

Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_12_jacaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 12, 2012, 08:45:55 pm
Power is the last thing to develop for a lot of hitters.  Vitters has always projected for power, and he's flashed it on a few occasions, such as his 10 homer month or whatever it was in Peoria.

I guess my view for Vitters right now is to park him in Triple-A for a couple of years and give him time to develop his power.  There aren't really any major expectations for him anymore, so there's no need to put any pressure on him to get him to Chicago in a hurry or anything like that. 

There's also always a chance that if the power comes, so will a few more walks too.  Pitchers are a lot more likely to pitch around a guy like Vitters if he's able to hit 25-30 home runs.

I agree, at least to the extent that we should leave him at Iowa until ( if) such a time as he actually dominates the league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 12, 2012, 09:01:49 pm
I agree, at least to the extent that we should leave him at Iowa until ( if) such a time as he actually dominates the league.

I suspect that by the middle to the end of next season Vitters will be dominating the PCL, and then if he then gets a September callup he will again look utterly lost.  That would still put him on track for reaching the majors by 2014... when he would be 24.  Not exactly the age players general reach the majors if they are going to have HOF-style careers, but also not too old to offer several very productive season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 12, 2012, 09:10:17 pm
Hoilman: 0-4, 2 K (Hit-streak ends)

Hernandez: 2-3, E,  (7-11 last 3 games)


Francescon: 7-1/3 -3-1-0-2-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_12_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 12, 2012, 10:07:09 pm
Cerda with an OBP of around .400.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 12, 2012, 10:19:55 pm
I'm about ready to take a month off from following our minor league teams Most of our "prospects" are either in EST or underperforming so much that their next jobs will probably be at McDonalds Other than Rizzo, none of them have done much to distinguish themselves. Among the pitchers, Concepcion and Cates have been horrid, and McNutt and Rhee have been inconsistent. The biggest disappointments among the hitters include Torreyes and DeVoss, with Lake, Jackson and Szczur not too far behind.

I'll probably be back after Maples, Vogelbach, Baez and Candelario start at Boise or Peoria, and Whitenack is assigned to a full-season team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 12, 2012, 10:24:55 pm
Lake?  He just started playing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 12, 2012, 10:36:49 pm
Don't you think that 6 games is a little quick to be disappointed with Lake?

I agree that there are not a lot of our prospects tearing up the minors so far.  But there have been a few pleasant surprises.  Francescon and Jensen both have looked quite good at Peoria, both in their stats and in the few scouting reports available.  Also, McKirihan and Weismann (who has already been moved up to Daytona) are looking fairly good.  And finally Rhoderick and Batista are looking quite good among an otherwise mediocre crew at Tennessee.

But I agree, that much of the season probably rests with the guys currently at EST.  And, of course, Rizzo.

Speaking of Maples, as far as I know, he isn't even throwing on the sidelines.  I wonder if he is the latest victim of "Valley Fever"?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 12, 2012, 10:54:34 pm
On the other hand, if Baez isn't moved up to Peoria, the Boise team should have an interesting prospect at every position but 2B.  Possible offensive team.

LF Dunston
CF Jeffrey Baez
RF Balaguert
3B Candelario
SS Baez
2b Amaya
1B Vogelbach
C  Rosario.

And by the way, ArizonaPhil mentioned that Whitenack struck out the first 7 batters he faced today, plus two more.  He threw 49 pitches in 4 innings.  Both he and Gibbs will probably be going up to at least Daytona before long.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 12, 2012, 11:06:34 pm
Hard not to be hopeful about Whitenack.  Before his injury, he was dominate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on May 12, 2012, 11:29:58 pm
Dominant is the word you're looking for, I believe. Sorry, pet peeve.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 12, 2012, 11:33:39 pm
Don't you think that 6 games is a little quick to be disappointed with Lake?

I agree that there are not a lot of our prospects tearing up the minors so far.  But there have been a few pleasant surprises.  Francescon and Jensen both have looked quite good at Peoria, both in their stats and in the few scouting reports available.  Also, McKirihan and Weismann (who has already been moved up to Daytona) are looking fairly good.  And finally Rhoderick and Batista are looking quite good among an otherwise mediocre crew at Tennessee.

But I agree, that much of the season probably rests with the guys currently at EST.  And, of course, Rizzo.

Speaking of Maples, as far as I know, he isn't even throwing on the sidelines.  I wonder if he is the latest victim of "Valley Fever"?

I'm not really all that "disappointed" with Lake (injured) or Szczur and Marco Hernandez (after their slow starts). None of the pitchers you named was a top prospect going into 2012, and all four are extreme long shots to ever join the Cubs' MLB rotation. The pitchers I had hoped might do that someday were McNutt, Rhee, Whitenack, Maples and Concepcion. Whitenack has dominated EST hitters, but I would expect any pitching prospect from AA to do that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 13, 2012, 12:02:00 am
The pitchers I mentioned are long shots to ever join the Cubs rotation, since they are all A ball level.  But several of them are comparable to McNutt after his first season.  Francescon in particular seems to be quite similar in tools, and has better control at a similar stage.  And a couple of them are quite interesting relief prospects.  This season has shown us that it is probably a good idea to have them in the system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 13, 2012, 01:54:35 am
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_12_iowaaa_srcaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 13, 2012, 07:04:26 am
ArizonaPhil mentioned that Whitenack struck out the first 7 batters he faced today, plus two more.  He threw 49 pitches in 4 innings.  Both he and Gibbs will probably be going up to at least Daytona before long.

So 9 Ks on 49 pitches in 4 innings?  Pretty impressive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 13, 2012, 02:11:09 pm
19 year old Gioskar Amaya has joined the Iowa Cubs from extended spring training.   He was signed out of Venezuela in 2009.  He hit .377 in rookie ball in 2011
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 13, 2012, 02:13:27 pm
That has to be a one day thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 13, 2012, 05:23:58 pm
Rosario: 6-3-0-0-3-7

Lorick: 1/3 IP, K, SV  (14-1/3 IP, 8 H, 7 BB, 20 K, 1 R)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_13_burafx_peoafx_1


Tenn rained out; Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 13, 2012, 05:37:58 pm
Quote
Lorick: 1/3 IP, K, SV  (14-1/3 IP, 8 H, 7 BB, 20 K, 1 R)

Not real good when most of your best performing pitching prospects are 23 or 24 year olds in Single-A pitcher's leagues (e.g. Lorick, Francescon, Jokish, etc.).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 13, 2012, 06:04:50 pm
Rizzo: 3-4, 2 2B

Jackson: 0-3, BB, 3 K

Rusin: 8-5-0-0-2-7


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_13_iowaaa_srcaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 13, 2012, 07:31:46 pm
In the entirety of MLB history, has there ever been a minor league system in worse shape than ours right now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 13, 2012, 07:33:12 pm
Probably.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 13, 2012, 07:37:44 pm
If so, it was a Cubs minor league system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 13, 2012, 07:53:34 pm
In his last 5 starts, Rusin has lasted 6 or more innings in each, and allowed more than one run only once.  (And he wasn't too bad in that game, although Batista let in 3 of his runs in the 7th).

Of the original five Iowa starters, Rusin was #4, and Wells, Wood, and Coleman have all gotten called up ahead of them, with Wells and Wood given opportunities to start.

I wonder how long Volstad's rope is.  Wood is probably ahead of Rusin in terms of opportunity, but his Iowa ERA is 2 runs higher and he's 1.5 to 1.0 WHIP.  Rusin of course is totally no-arm finesse guy, and when he's bad he can get killed, plus he's not on 40-man.  So his long-term odds are shaky and he may need to do a whole lot more proving.  But an interesting possibility, at some point.  Sooner or later, Volstad either needs to start getting luckier or pitching better or something, or somebody else is going to get a chance.   

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 13, 2012, 08:22:23 pm

I wonder how long Volstad's rope is.  Wood is probably ahead of Rusin in terms of opportunity, but his Iowa ERA is 2 runs higher and he's 1.5 to 1.0 WHIP.  Rusin of course is totally no-arm finesse guy, and when he's bad he can get killed, plus he's not on 40-man.  So his long-term odds are shaky and he may need to do a whole lot more proving.  But an interesting possibility, at some point.  Sooner or later, Volstad either needs to start getting luckier or pitching better or something, or somebody else is going to get a chance.   


According to AZ Phil, Volstad (as did Randy Wells) would have to pass through option waivers to send him to AAA. Wells got through and Volstad and Wells have almost identical salaries, near $2.7--perhaps too high to claim given their recent work. 

Cubs have lost every game that Volstad has started, so you can't go that route indefinitely and Sveum seems to be losing patience with the guy.  Hard to see much upside for either Volstad or Wells. 

Funny thing is that Cubs, of course, are basically paying Volstad Z-salary given the money going with the swap.  I'll go out on a limb and guess that nobody would claim Volstad if they had to pick up his "true" $18 salary.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 13, 2012, 08:32:16 pm
I'm afraid that if the Cubs make a move that causes them to lose Volstad, they're going to regret it.  His bad innings this year are just so weird...he just seems like a guy who is going to be able to make one little adjustment out of the stretch and turn into a very successful starter. 

Maybe not...maybe he just sucks.  But he's just been so close to really good starts pretty much every time out that I feel like dumping him would be a mistake.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 13, 2012, 08:58:37 pm
Rusin of course is totally no-arm finesse guy, and when he's bad he can get killed

Guys like that never amount to anything anyway.  Look at Moyer.

Worthless bum.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 13, 2012, 09:09:39 pm
No reason to rush any decisions.  But Volstad seems about as consistent as you can get, he's allowed 4-6 runs in each of his last six starts, 5 or 6 innings each.  Very consistent.  He's a no-K guy like he's always been.  His WHIP is is the 1.4's, just like it's been every year. 

Hopefully things will turn for him at some point.  And perhaps he is just due for a change of luck, or some tiny adjustment will turn everything around. 

You could replace him in rotation and put him in relief. 

I'd be interested to see how he did in relief. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 13, 2012, 09:57:08 pm
Like Craig, I would prefer that the Cubs move Volstad to relief.  About the only thing he hasn't had a problem with is walks, which is the bane of the Cubs bullpen.  Sometimes a change of role can help a little.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 13, 2012, 10:11:54 pm
Cubs have scored an average of 2.57 runs in the games Volstad has started so he's not exactly getting any help from his offense either....of course, that's still a lot better than the 1.6 runs a game Dempster is getting.  Just for fun of it, Sam is getting 5 runs a game, Garza is getting 4.67 and Maholm is stuck in the middle with 4.  Even with a couple of below average pitching, a small boost in offense and this is easily a .500 team.  Good chance that happens as the Cubs move out of the tough part of the schedule. 

While I realize he isn't going to keep up at this pace, Lahair is going to need to not be a mirage, though.  I'm among those who thinks Maine needs to be called up.  I also liked the trade Soriano for Beckett idea when Rizzo gets called up I saw someone post a lil while back.  Even if Beckett isn't a good starter anymore, he could still be an asset in the bp if, by moving him there, he regains a couple mph on his fastball.  That also might be incentive for him to work a lil harder this offseason to prove he can still be a starter next year.  He definitely needs some "tough love" either way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 13, 2012, 11:08:25 pm
Quote
Cubs have scored an average of 2.57 runs in the games Volstad has started so he's not exactly getting any help from his offense

Yeah, the offense is totally to blame for losing games in which Volstad pitches with that miniscule 6.92 ERA.

The bottom line is that his results have been Doug Davis bad and they expected him to be at least passable as a fourth or fifth starter.

He isn't getting the job done at this point and they should probably let someone else take a turn or two to see if they can do better than what Volstad has given them.

You can look at his half-full numbers if you like but at some point you have to get production from that rotation spot.

It's not like 2011 when there simply weren't enough pitchers to fill out the rotation.  They have options this year and maybe they should see how one of those options pitches when given an extended look.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 13, 2012, 11:32:03 pm
You could replace him in rotation and put him in relief. 

I'd be interested to see how he did in relief. 

This is one of those out of the box ideas that you couldn't reasonably expect Sveum to do, but I still wish he'd just make Volstad the closer for a while and see what happens.  We couldn't get any worse results out of the #5 starter spot or the closer spot than we've gotten right now.  It'd push Dolis back to the 6th or 7th innings where he belongs, and it'd make our 6th to 8th inning relief corps much stronger.  Even if Volstad is just "decent" and was a middle of the road type closer, it'd still be a huge improvement over what we've been doing and do a lot to shore up the bullpen.

It worked for Ryan Dempster in 2005 and Brett Myers in 2007.  I wish someone would throw that idea out to Sveum and see if he'd run with it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 13, 2012, 11:38:12 pm
I think Dempster was put into relief more to give his health time to improve than anything else.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 13, 2012, 11:50:38 pm
Maine was hit hard tonight, bytheway.  I'd put Volstad in relief and recall Rusin.  He's most earned a shot - Wells/Wood havent been good in AAA.  Return the rule V kid.  You're not doing him any favors.

At least use Rusin in relief.  Lefties are hitting .122 against.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 13, 2012, 11:53:10 pm
16K's in Jackson's last 35 ABs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 14, 2012, 12:27:54 am
Yeah, the offense is totally to blame for losing games in which Volstad pitches with that miniscule 6.92 ERA.

The bottom line is that his results have been Doug Davis bad and they expected him to be at least passable as a fourth or fifth starter.

He isn't getting the job done at this point and they should probably let someone else take a turn or two to see if they can do better than what Volstad has given them.

You can look at his half-full numbers if you like but at some point you have to get production from that rotation spot.

It's not like 2011 when there simply weren't enough pitchers to fill out the rotation.  They have options this year and maybe they should see how one of those options pitches when given an extended look.

Yeah, umm, i didn't mean to imply that Volstad had been a good pitcher this year, or an average one, or, for that matter, even a mediocre one...he definitely hasn't helped himself
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 14, 2012, 01:40:06 am
Volstad doesn't have the kind of stuff you normally see from a closer.  Bad idea.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 14, 2012, 02:13:02 am
No matter who the Cubs put in as closer, he doesn't have the stuff you normally see from a closer, and it is a bad idea.  If we have to use someone who's use is a bad idea, it might as well be Volstad.

As I recall, with the Cubs, Rod Beck didn't have the stuff you would normally see from a closer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 14, 2012, 07:06:56 am
No matter who the Cubs put in as closer, he doesn't have the stuff you normally see from a closer, and it is a bad idea.....

True.  Samardz, Garza, and Dempster are the three guys with closer stuff. 

Dolis has closer velocity/movement on his fastball.  But he's got nothing else (no second pitch, and no command even of his one pitch.)  If stuff and command are the two halves of a a good pitch, Dolis has basically half of a good pitch right now.

I agree with Sveum: given the alternatives, Dolis might be the least awful of bad options. 

I agree with JR: it's unfair to Dolis and inappropriate for his development to have him closing, when he is unqualified and unprepared. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 14, 2012, 08:37:20 am
Tony Zych may be the best closer in the minors and he's being fast-tracked, but certainly not ready yet.

Let me begin this with a disclaimer: I love Kerry Wood.  I think it's Cub-like fatalism that in the past 10 years, when we've needed him, he's hurt.  Right now, the best closer, if he were healthy and we could be reasonably guaranteed that he would stay healthy, would be Wood, perhaps for a year until one of our prospects were ready.  Sigh.  Such is Cubdom.

OTOH, we need another left or two so that Russell can move into the closer role.  He's really been impressing me, but we have that old-fashioned thinking that we don't want to burn our only lefty in the pen in that role so we go with unsuitable righties that give the game away which wastes the lefty's effort.  Sigh.  Such is Cubdom.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 14, 2012, 08:41:16 am
Quote from: John Sickels
**The Chicago Cubs have high hopes for High-A outfielder Matt "Scrabble" Szczur, one of the best pure athletes in baseball. He made a lot of noise by hitting .314/.366/.431 with 17 steals in 66 games in the Midwest League last year, but his hitting tailed off after being promoted to High-A, with a .260/.283/.410 mark. Returning to Daytona this year, he's still not showing a lot of pop with an overall line of .250/.353/.348, although his plate discipline has improved a great deal (17/22 BB/K in 132 AB, compared to 5/20 BB/K in 173 last year). He's stolen 16 bases in 21 attempts and has the kind of defensive ability you'd expect with those wheels, but he's got to do more with the stick. Szczur has now played 76 games in High-A with a .256/.315/.384 mark, and that won't cut it at higher levels.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 14, 2012, 11:26:10 am
I agree with JR: it's unfair to Dolis and inappropriate for his development to have him closing, when he is unqualified and unprepared. 

Yeah, Dolis has twice as many walks as strikeouts so far.  You can't have a guy like that be your closer, regardless of how good his raw stuff is. 

Not to be too hard on him, since he's a rookie and performing admirably in a difficult situation.  Still, it's like you say, he's totally unprepared and unqualified to be a closer at this stage of his career.  It's unfortunate we're putting him in that spot right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 14, 2012, 04:17:00 pm
Cubs release Pierre LePage.  Yet another example why when Boise starts their season, you should take the stats there with a grain of salt.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=lepage001pie
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 14, 2012, 05:08:27 pm
I wish they'd get a second lefty on the roster so they could put Russell in the closer's role.  He's the type of pitcher I think teams should look for at closer--solidly average to a little above in most areas, but very good control (at least historically--walk rate is a little high this year).  Since he doesn't beat himself with walks, I think he'd rarely be prone to the big blowup inning where he beats himself.  He may blow an extra 1 run game or two every year, but he'd be really good in the 2-3 run games.

Once the Cubs put together a good bullpen in 2-3 years, he'd probably be their 3rd or 4th best reliever.  But if he was effectively doing the job, he wouldn't get removed from the closer's role...meaning the best pitchers would still be available to pitch the highest leverage situations.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 14, 2012, 06:03:39 pm
Junior Lake had a home run and a double today.

AND THREE WALKS.

And McNutt pitched 5 innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on May 14, 2012, 06:18:31 pm
Too bad Lake has been injured.  If he was tearing it up in AA it would be tempting to see him take Barney's spot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 14, 2012, 06:25:45 pm
That would be a pretty error prone middle infield between Castro and Lake, though.

Lake's more than likely an outfielder if he's able to put everything together at the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 14, 2012, 06:29:11 pm
Lake is back at 3B and leading off again for the Smokies in the second game of a DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 14, 2012, 06:43:49 pm
Junior Lake singled to right and was then caught stealing in the bottom of the first in the nightcap
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 14, 2012, 08:34:45 pm
McNutt: 5-3-2-2-1-5, 2 HR

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_14_jacaax_tenaax_1


Kirk: 7-6-1-1-2-5

Zych: 1-1-0-0-0-1, SV

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_14_dbcafa_breafa_1

Beeler: 7 IP, 3 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_14_jacaax_tenaax_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 14, 2012, 09:13:12 pm
Watkins obp has been pretty damn good his entire minor league career ... wonder if he's the one to push Barney next.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 14, 2012, 09:14:35 pm
Torreyes is batting .178.

That trade sucks so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 14, 2012, 09:20:45 pm
Torreyes is batting .178.

That trade sucks so far.

Ugh.  Who is this pitcher?  4.50 ERA, 1.58 WHIP in 12 IP.  Would've been free agent at the end of the year if he hadn't been extended to a dumb contract for any non-Rivera reliever.  And with the new CBA, he would've been certain to get his team no compensation.

That's right, it's Sean Marshall.  Get over it.  Marshall is a very good reliever, but getting Travis Wood and 2 legitimate prospects for one year of him is an absolute STEAL, even if none of the players work out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 14, 2012, 09:58:03 pm
Rizzo with #12 tonite already, 1-0 Iowa after 3 innings.

Rizzo and LaHair in the same lineup should be fun to watch!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2012, 01:35:34 am
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_14_iowaaa_srcaaa_1

Burke: 6-4-1-1-2-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_14_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 15, 2012, 02:35:24 am
Looks like Jay Jackson's days as a starter are over.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 15, 2012, 11:44:29 am
Might as well see if he can be more effective as a reliever.  Not much to lose.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 15, 2012, 11:46:38 am
I thought he had already been made a reliever, as a matter of fact some years ago.  I also thought he has had several shots with several teams as closer and failed.  KC comes to mind, Nationals, I think; I think he was the first one they tried in SF when Wilson went down last year.  I may be thinking of the wrong guy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 15, 2012, 11:47:23 am
Concepcion has pitched 3 innings with t hits, no runs, 2 strikeouts and 1 walk.

Take him out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 15, 2012, 11:51:40 am
Concepcion has pitched 3 innings with t hits, no runs, 2 strikeouts and 1 walk.

Take him out.

Bring him up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 15, 2012, 12:02:32 pm
I thought he had already been made a reliever, as a matter of fact some years ago.  I also thought he has had several shots with several teams as closer and failed.  KC comes to mind, Nationals, I think; I think he was the first one they tried in SF when Wilson went down last year.  I may be thinking of the wrong guy.

Purple?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 15, 2012, 12:05:47 pm
I think Curt has his topics confused and is talking about Mike MacDougal, not Jay Jackson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 15, 2012, 12:13:11 pm
I think Curt has his topics confused and is talking about Mike MacDougal, not Jay Jackson.

Oh, yeah, I can see that now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 15, 2012, 12:20:50 pm
Minuscule sample size, but Jackson has 7 Ks in 3.2 innings as a reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 15, 2012, 12:28:30 pm
That's about as many Ks as Brett Jackson has in any 3.2 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 15, 2012, 12:35:39 pm
Brett's K-rate is 35 percent.  To compare, Rizzo's is 21.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 15, 2012, 12:59:20 pm
br, is correct.  That quote was from davep about McDougal.  I didn't confuse topices, the server did.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2012, 01:42:46 pm
Lake: 3-5, 2B, 3 RBI, K, E

Cabrera: 1 IP, K, SV,  ( 22-6 K/BB in 17-2/3 IP )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_15_jacaax_tenaax_1



DeVoss: 2-2, 2 BB, 4 SB

Concepcion: 6-3-0-0-3-3

Wells: 3-2-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_15_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2012, 02:20:00 pm
Rizzo just hit another homer in the 1st inning. More surprisingly, Vitters drew a walk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 15, 2012, 02:32:06 pm
Looking at Cabrera's stats, he's been torched throughout his career .... this year he's be fantastic--the first as a reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 15, 2012, 02:48:50 pm
Rizzo just hit another homer in the 1st inning. More surprisingly, Vitters drew a walk.

What I love about this is that LaHair is proving he's a guy you can count on.  That takes tons of pressure off of Rizzo when he comes up this time.  Praying LaHair keeps it going, the two will be fun to watch in the same lineup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 15, 2012, 04:31:20 pm
Lake's start has been pretty astonishing.  He's totally filling up the stats sheet.  Who'd have guessed? 

In 9 games, thus far:
1.  11 hits/.344 average
2.  5 XBH/.948 slugging
3.  6 K's.  Not good, but if he couldsustain at "only" 20%, that would be a huge win for him and open the world offensively.
4.  8 walks.  What?  That's the most shocking of all.  Last year at Daytona, he got over 200 AB's and didn't take 8 walks.  Weird. 
5.  6 errors.  He's had 68 errors over the last two years, so being an error-machine is par for the course.  But 6 errors in 9 games is astonishing.
6.  4 CS already. 

Heh, between CS and errors, that's more than one per game.  Can you imagine a big-leaguer playing 160 games and having 160 combined errors/caught-stealing?  It's awesome! 

The magic of small sample size.  Always fun to prorate small-sample numbers out.

I know, Vizquel and Jeter made errors their first year as teenage SS's, too.  Even HOF SS's sometimes make a lot of errors at first.  But the HOF SS's tend to get better.  Lake's in his 4th full season year as an infield defender, and his 6th year as a pro.  Some progress might be in order. 

Or else, if he really does start to look like a factor offensively, a move to the OF might make sense sooner instead of waiting forever.  With Jackson, Ha, Szczur, Golden all looking somewhat underqualified, a great athlete with a big arm and plus speed who could produce offensively might be somewhat competitive with the competition in RF. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2012, 05:00:12 pm
Rizzo: 3-4, 3B, HR, 2 RBI, K

Jackson: 0-4, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_15_iowaaa_srcaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 15, 2012, 05:51:28 pm
Rizzo!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 15, 2012, 05:54:02 pm
Lake is listed at 6'2", 215.  He was a lot bigger than that when I saw him in the AFL last year and supposedly he grew quite a bit over the winter.

Sounds like a corner outfielder to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on May 15, 2012, 05:55:35 pm
Does anyone know what the dates are to delay Rizzo's various clocks from starting?  Free agency and super-two and all that?  One has to figure he'll be up as soon as he's past the right date.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 15, 2012, 06:06:37 pm
Does anyone know what the dates are to delay Rizzo's various clocks from starting?  Free agency and super-two and all that?  One has to figure he'll be up as soon as he's past the right date.

I think he has to stay in Iowa for almost the entire season in order to kick back free agenct and super two.  I suspect they will bring him up whenever they think he is ready.

I hope that when they do, they move LaHair to the outfield rather than trade him, unless they can get an overwhelming offer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 15, 2012, 06:08:24 pm
Lake is listed at 6'2", 215.  He was a lot bigger than that when I saw him in the AFL last year and supposedly he grew quite a bit over the winter.

Sounds like a corner outfielder to me.

It looks to me like they want to try Lake at third base, moving him to the outfield only if he can't make it there.

I believe ArizonaPhil said that he was closer to 6' 5" than to 6' 2"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 15, 2012, 06:13:33 pm
Does anyone know what the dates are to delay Rizzo's various clocks from starting?  Free agency and super-two and all that?  One has to figure he'll be up as soon as he's past the right date.
(http://rotoauthority.blogs.com/.a/6a00d834515b9a69e20163022d8563970d-580wi)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on May 15, 2012, 06:18:28 pm
Thanks
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 15, 2012, 06:19:54 pm
So the earliest you'll see Rizzo is July.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 15, 2012, 07:05:42 pm
Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 15, 2012, 07:39:32 pm
With Jackson, Ha, Szczur, Golden all looking somewhat underqualified, a great athlete with a big arm and plus speed who could produce offensively might be somewhat competitive with the competition in RF. 

Seriously?  Jackson looking "somewhat underqualified?" I would have commented on it being premature to give up on Szczur, but Jackson?  Wow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 15, 2012, 09:22:05 pm
Gioskar Amaya is hitting 1000 with an ops of 2000 at Iowa.  Time to bring him up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 15, 2012, 10:43:42 pm
Ron, do you think Jackson is qualified right now?  Wow. 

Jackson may become qualified someday.  But he's certainly underqualified now, IMO. 

Lake might possibly become qualified at some point.   

But we've got three outfield positions to fill, and I'm not certain that any of DeJesus, Campana, or Soriano are locked-in as long-term asset championship outfield starters.  So if Lake was to convert to outfield and actually become an asset hitter, it's not like we're so overloaded with can't-miss outfielders that Lake would be wasted. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 15, 2012, 11:14:22 pm
I don't think the post Ron was responding to was referring to Jackson now, and I don't think he was either.  I think the implication he was disagreeing with was that he was underqualified forever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 15, 2012, 11:24:14 pm
 the post lumped Jackson with guys (golden, ha, szczur) who clearly are not a factor now, so I also read it as a thumbs down on Jackson's future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 16, 2012, 12:04:49 am
Both Jackson and Szczur are young guys in a young season...tho' it would fabulous if they were hitting like Rizzo, it's WAY too early to get down on either!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 16, 2012, 06:17:48 am
What Deeg, Reb and ben said.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 16, 2012, 08:39:42 am
Quote
Interview - Joe Bohringer and Oneri Fleita

Both Cubs' Director of Pro Scouting Joe Bohringer and Vice President-Player Personnel Oneri Fleita were in attendance for the series. I had a chance to speak with them over the course of the series, and they agreed to answer a few questions:

ChicagoCubsOnline: Have there been any prospects that have stood out so far this season?

Oneri Fleita: Our player of the month, Anthony Rizzo, has put up video game-type numbers in Triple-A. He's looked good defensively. He and Frank Batista stand out. Batista is a player that we've only had for a couple of years, and he's at Triple-A. He shows that what's most important is to throw strikes.

CCO: How about any surprises?

Joe Bohringer: Tony Campana did a great job for us at Iowa, and now he's up with the big league club.

Fleita: I like our pitching here (at Peoria). I've been impressed.

CCO: Do you see any promotions coming?

Bohringer: We'd like to see the rosters stabilized at this point. We're just coming around to 100 at bats for some players, and some players are just coming back from injuries or are just not ready yet.

Fleita: We try not to get too high or too low on any of our players this early in the season. Some players get off to slow starts.

CCO: Are there any players that are in Arizona at this time that have looked good?

Bohringer: Well, I haven't seen him since spring training, but Shawon Dunston Jr. comes to mind. He can hit leadoff, and projects to center or left. We currently see him as a centerfielder. He works hard, and I've had good reports on him. Is that okay to say (to Fleita)?

Fleita: (laughs) He hasn't given away any secrets.

CCO: Do you have any expectations for the upcoming draft?

Fleita: Well, that's Jason McLeod's job. All we ask is for good players. He's done a good job with that, and there have been some good players from the Dominican (Academy). (laughs) Just get us good players and we'll do the rest.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 16, 2012, 09:08:22 am
I kind of wish CCO would have asked Fleita about his feelings working with the new regime and how his approach with scouting and developing players has changed, if any.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 16, 2012, 09:53:43 am
Heh, my posts are always way too short, I guess!  I have to spell everything out or else it gets overread/misinterpreted.
Quote
I think the implication he was disagreeing with was that he was underqualified forever.

I don't know what's going to happen forever.  He's under-qualified now.  Who knows whether he'll change and improve enough to someday become qualified.   The likelihood that a guy will improve enough to become qualified probably varies, but the minor leagues are largely populated by guys who might someday improve themselves such that they become qualified. 

But Jackson isn't now.  He may later, he may never be.  It's too soon to say he'll never be; but at this point I think the possibility is undeniably real that he may never be. 

To some degree this is a change in perception.  Earlier this spring, it was widely suggested that Jackson already was qualified.  That he was ready, that on merit he should be starting in CF for the Cubs, and that the only reason he wasn't was to defer free agency and super two status.  I think the perception has changed. 

Quote
the post lumped Jackson with guys (golden, ha, szczur) who clearly are not a factor now, so I also read it as a thumbs down on Jackson's future.


The thumb moves.  When a guy goes 48K/3HR, the thumb needs to readjust to some degree.  Performance should do that.  Jackson,
Soto, Pujols; Rizzo, Samardz, Russell; the thumb readjusts. 

This spring, more people ranked Jackson ahead of Rizzo than behind.  I don't think that's true anymore.   Sveum loved Jackson this spring, but perceptions are based on information at hand.  He wasn't watching Jackson struggle like has recently. 

Sometimes I get the impression that posters are viewed as shallow/simplistic/fickle if they ever readjust perceptions/projections based on performance or additional information.  But, things do change.  To not readjust perceptions seems faulty, perhaps more stubborn than wise.   

I think Jackson's future will hinge on his HR's.  A bunch of HR's is worth a lot.  He hit 12 in 2010, 20 in 2011, at age 22.  He's at an age where HR-output often explodes, so I'd hoped he was emerging as a serious HR-hitter.  As a 20-35 HR guy, that could justify a whole bunch of K's.  If you changed his 48K/3HR output this spring to 48K/8HR, an extra 5 HR would fix his numbers and we wouldn't be having this discussion.  We might be back to the "he'd be up except for super 2" discussion.  Or if he had 13 like Rizzo

But he'll need to hit HR's and/or improve the K-rate, or both.   
AAA:  35%  (48 games in 2011:  35%  35 games in 2012:  35%)
AA:  24.2%
A+:  23.9%
A-:  22.7%

At this point, it's premature to write him off, but it's also premature to assume that he's going to be a effective regular for years.  His play will determine that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on May 16, 2012, 09:56:43 am
Great post, thanks!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 16, 2012, 11:09:06 am
Quote
CCO: Do you have any expectations for the upcoming draft?

Fleita: Well, that's Jason McLeod's job.

Tim who?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 16, 2012, 11:12:52 am
I noticed that too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 16, 2012, 11:15:53 am
heh heh heh
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2012, 12:32:59 pm
I agree that it is far too early to write off Jackson and Ceasar.  On the other hand, I would feel much more optimistic if they were each off to a good start.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2012, 07:01:34 pm
Does anyone know what the dates are to delay Rizzo's various clocks from starting?  Free agency and super-two and all that?  One has to figure he'll be up as soon as he's past the right date.

One has to think the concern is much more about what is best for Rizzo's development as a player and the team's prospects of winning for the long term and not saving some money based on keeping him in the minors a bit longer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2012, 07:16:50 pm
Lake's start has been pretty astonishing....  I know, Vizquel and Jeter made errors their first year as teenage SS's, too.  Even HOF SS's sometimes make a lot of errors at first.  But the HOF SS's tend to get better.  Lake's in his 4th full season year as an infield defender, and his 6th year as a pro.  Some progress might be in order. 

6th season as a pro.... with his first season at age 17.

Whether a player is playing as a pro or not is relatively insignificant compared to the length of time he has been playing, and his age.

He is 22.  If his fielding is a concern for a 22 year old, it is a legitimate concern, but how long he has been a pro doesn't factor very heavily into the equation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 16, 2012, 07:22:59 pm
Um, no.

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-Minor-League-update-Rizzo-still-rak?blockID=708976&feedID=9399

"21-year-old shortstop prospect Junior Lake spent his first full week with his new club and performed pretty well. Despite only going 5-for-23 (.217), Lake drove in three runs with a home run and two extra base hits. "

Yeah, last ten games, Lake is batting .344.  So, yeah, great article. (actually, the last 9 games, since that's all he's played at Tenn this year)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 16, 2012, 07:24:17 pm
It does factor in.  A college player plays a couple of games a week.  A pro plays 6 or 7 games a week.  I would think the additional games would mean something as far as experience is concerned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2012, 08:08:12 pm
It does factor in.  A college player plays a couple of games a week.  A pro plays 6 or 7 games a week.  I would think the additional games would mean something as far as experience is concerned.

... how long he has been a pro doesn't factor very heavily into the equation.

Saying something "doesn't factor heavily," is not quite the same as saying that it means nothing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 16, 2012, 08:08:19 pm
Um, no.

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-Minor-League-update-Rizzo-still-rak?blockID=708976&feedID=9399

"21-year-old shortstop prospect Junior Lake spent his first full week with his new club and performed pretty well. Despite only going 5-for-23 (.217), Lake drove in three runs with a home run and two extra base hits. "

Yeah, last ten games, Lake is batting .344.  So, yeah, great article. (actually, the last 9 games, since that's all he's played at Tenn this year)

What is the "Um, no," in response to?

Me listing his age as 22, when csnchicago says he is 21?

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=lake--001jun  Born: March 27, 1990 in San Pedro, DO (Age 22)  If he was in fact born on March 27th, he is 22.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 16, 2012, 08:20:37 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 3B, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_16_dbcafa_breafa_1

Tennessee and Iowa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 16, 2012, 10:11:18 pm
Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_16_peoafx_cliafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 16, 2012, 10:21:02 pm
It was referencing the csn article saying Lake had batted so poorly ... no idea where they pulled that info from.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 16, 2012, 10:30:00 pm
For those down on Szczur, I'll remind you of his splits ... against righties, his obp is around .420.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 16, 2012, 10:37:13 pm
the only thing encouraging about Rizzo's otherwise lackluster start is that his obp against righties is only .287. That has to be a crazy anomaly for a good left-handed hitter. His current on-base vs. lefties is also nuts -- .474.
As he regresses/progresses to the mean against both, his overall OBP has to go up, probably a lot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 16, 2012, 10:40:53 pm
I assume you meant Jackson, not Rizzo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 16, 2012, 10:59:34 pm
bitter, do you know if Szczur had splits like that last year, too?  Not very common that a RH hitter has such extreme splits doing so much better against RHP.  Do you think that's real, or just some fluke that will increasingly wash out as the year continues? 

But yes, if we had a guy with his speed as a primary platoon leadoff guy vs RHP with a .420 OBP, that would be pretty awesome. 

His numbers have gotten fairly decent, .357 OBP overall isn't too bad.  And I'd had the idea that he'd been all singles, but over 1/3 of his hits have gone for XB.  If only he had a few HR's.  If you took his present numbers and added 3 HR's to it, his numbers would be terrific.  But hard to hit for great average without any HR's.  I'd hoped he'd be blossoming into a 15-HR guy this year, after getting 10 last year. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 16, 2012, 11:05:14 pm
Bitter, yes, I meant Jackson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 16, 2012, 11:31:58 pm
Craig, I don't recall his splits from last year ... my only point was his numbers are skewed by how atrocious he's been against lefties.  He's batting around .180 against them, so it's killing the appearance of what I see as an encouraging season  (he was awful last year in the FSL). 

I've never seen him so I can only comment on stats.  I would add what we all know- he's only devoted the last few years to playing baseball only.  So, he should probably get more latitude w/ our disappointments on that point, too.

And as you wrote, his current cumulative obp is actually good ... and he's been real good the last 10 games with an obp of .370.

What is encouraging to me about him is he doesnt strike out.  He's shown that to be consistent in pro-ball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 16, 2012, 11:58:53 pm
Until the Cubs are willing to dfa Soriano, they can't even consider calling up Rizzo, because what do you do with LaHair?

An outfield of Soriano-Dejesus-LaHair .... no thanks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 17, 2012, 09:01:05 am
Craig, I don't recall his splits from last year ... my only point was his numbers are skewed by how atrocious he's been against lefties.  He's batting around .180 against them, so it's killing the appearance of what I see as an encouraging season  ...- he's only devoted the last few years to playing baseball only.  So, he should probably get more latitude w/ our disappointments on that point, too.   And as you wrote, his current cumulative obp is actually good ... and he's been real good the last 10 games with an obp of .370.   What is encouraging to me about him is he doesnt strike out.  He's shown that to be consistent in pro-ball.

Good and helpful thoughts.  If we're looking for a leadoff man, we've done with lots worse than guys with .357 OBP, a good range in CF, and real base-stealing speed.  Your post suggests several reasons why the .357 OBP might get better:


1.  LHP split.  He's .236 OBP versus lefties. 
2.  HR's.  He's hit zero.  If he adds even a little HR output to the mix, OBP will rise.  Hitting 5 HR over a season is worth an extra 10 points in OBP and 50 points in OPS.  He hit 10 last year.
3.  BABIP.  I figure his BABIP at .307.  Most fast contact hitters do considerably higher.  He's .200 BABIP versus lefties
4.  K rate.  16% K-rate this season, he was 11% last year.     

Related thoughts:
1.  BABIP:  He had a very low BABIP at Daytona last year too.  Original Cub reports was that he had a natural knack for "barreling" the ball.  It would seem easy to anticipate a high BABIP guy from a hustling speedster who is reasonably strong but is not selling out for power, and who is a natural contact hitter.  I wonder why his has tended low, and if that will continue?  Maybe flukey, maybe not.  May be part of the price of more patience this year.  Get yourself into more 2-strike counts, and then hit a lot of weak-contact AB's?  Maybe he just doesn't have any explosion in his wrists, which explains no HR snap or BABIP snap? 
2.  K-rate:  Is higher K-rate flukey, and he'll settle back somewhere towards last year's rate?  Or is that again the natural price of working deeper, taking more pitches, etc..  If so it's probably a price worth paying, but it may mean that the solid walk-rate and the very low K-rate are mutually exclusive. 
3.  HR:  Last year he hit 10.  If you otherwise took his numbers from this year, and then mixed in his 10-HR rate from last year, the numbers would look quite good.  But again, is it one or the other?  To get back to that kind of modest HR-rate, would he need to sell out at the expense of his BABIP and walk rate?  (Easier to swing for the fences on a 1st-pitch fastball than on a 2-2 slider.) 
4.  Earlier I'd thought that he started out walking but couldn't hit; then when he started to hit he stopped walking.  So again I feared it was one or the other but couldn't be both.  I still have that fear, but perhaps he's finding some compromise.  In May, he's hitting .293 with 4 walks/41 AB.  So maybe he's finding a balance. 
5.  He's still 22, with <700 pro AB.  So he may still be working things out to find his best balance. 


Will be interesting to see how the season unfolds for him.  Heh, having written this, he'll probably go hitless in his next three games! 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 17, 2012, 12:24:36 pm
And it will be all Craig's fault.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 17, 2012, 12:40:19 pm
So, I take it that Szczur is no longer in the "somewhat unqualified" category?   ;)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 17, 2012, 12:52:43 pm
 :)

Correct.  He's "extremely", "very", "super-much" unqualified, not just "somewhat" unqualified!   


But he's NOT "hopelessly" unqualified.  He's still got a plausible chance to grow and improve into a useful player.  So he's not "disqualified"! 

Heh, maybe I'll use "disqualified" or "hopelessly unqualified" for a guy who, barring some talent-transforming change of health for roster-fill no-chance guys.  And "unqualified" for guys who have an uncertain chance someday, but clearly aren't ready now, whether that chance be at the 5% end or the 80% end.  Jackson, Szczur, Ha, Dunston, Lake, they all fall somewhere in that continuum. 

Rizzo, I think, has moved beyond that.  He already appears to be rather well "qualified" right now.  Usually not many guys in the minors who are presently qualified or sure-thing ready, though.  At least not in an org that is as talent-thin as the Cubs.  In Rizzo's case, it isn't a case of "if" he'll be called up and given an extended opportunity to start regularly, he's already earned that.   

I'm kind of thinking Randy Wells has moved into the "disqualified" category.  Since he had his injury last spring, his velocity has never come back and he seems rather hopelessly underqualified.  He was never overpowering, but he had a lot more juice before.  I think he might do well to consider surgery. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 17, 2012, 03:22:20 pm
IF Nate Samson has been promoted to Iowa and RHP Frank Batista goes to Tennessee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 17, 2012, 03:24:58 pm
And IF Gloskar Amaya returns to EST
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 17, 2012, 08:16:21 pm
Rizzo at it once again...HR #14 and rbis 38 and 39!
Vitters with a homer batting 5th and Jackson with a triple and single in two PAs so far hitting 6th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on May 17, 2012, 08:27:24 pm
Translation - They're facing a really bad pitching staff
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 17, 2012, 08:35:32 pm
Jackson has now also homered. All 3 (Rizzo, Vitters, Jackson) homered versus a lefty pitcher. Jackson is killing lefties. Strange 6 weeks for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 17, 2012, 09:22:05 pm
After one of the worst starts I can ever remember, Marco Hernandez has hit 353 over the last 10 games, and raised his BA above 200.  Perhaps in time to prevent a demotion to Boise in June, if he can keep it up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2012, 09:24:06 pm
Hernandez: 2-3, 3B, BB, K, CS

Francescon: 6-2-1-0-2-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_17_peoafx_cliafx_1


Simpson: 2-1/3 -2-2-2-3-0, HR

Szczur: 0-3, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_17_dbcafa_pbcafa_1



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2012, 09:29:24 pm
Rizzo: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, BB

Jackson: 3-4, 3B, HR, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_17_slcaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 17, 2012, 09:29:48 pm
Ceasar takes a walk.  Craig will be happy.

Or sad.  I forget which.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 17, 2012, 09:51:54 pm
Besides Rizzo, who has the best career offensively out of the guys in AAA?  Actually, you can include AA, too.  I have a feeling I'm going to be the only one to say this and I'll also probably be wrong, but I just wanted to go on record and say I think it'll be Vitters. 

No doubt Jackson will always be a much better defensive player.  He is also a full year older than Vitters...they were both born in August.  After adding AA in, I think its a toss up between Lake and Jackson for the next best offensive career.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 17, 2012, 09:55:04 pm
Too soon to tell with either Jackson or Vitters who would be better, although at this point you'd probably still have to say Jackson.

And of course, there's definitely a non-zero chance that neither of those guys will have much of a career to speak of at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 17, 2012, 09:57:26 pm
Craig and Bitterman and anyone else -- this site seems to have Caesar's splits vs righties/lefties for least year and this:

http://minorleaguecentral.com/player.php?pid=519333&split=3000
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 17, 2012, 10:01:53 pm
If only he had a few HR's.  If you took his present numbers and added 3 HR's to it, his numbers would be terrific. 

Ah, yes, the hypothetical HRs.

They do wonders to help pad a prospect's performance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 17, 2012, 10:03:12 pm
Kyler Burke would be in the Hall of Fame right now if we gave him all of Scotti's hypothetical home runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 17, 2012, 10:20:07 pm
Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_17_tenaax_msbaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 17, 2012, 10:23:31 pm
Other than Rizzo, man it's been a really boring year on the farm.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 17, 2012, 10:24:47 pm
Nice outing for Travis Wood.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 17, 2012, 11:18:08 pm
Craig and Bitterman and anyone else -- this site seems to have Caesar's splits vs righties/lefties for least year and this:

http://minorleaguecentral.com/player.php?pid=519333&split=3000 (http://minorleaguecentral.com/player.php?pid=519333&split=3000)

Thanks, Shasson.  Very nice.  OK, he didn't have this year's L/R splits last year, that's for sure.  Nice site. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 17, 2012, 11:19:31 pm
The last three pitchers for the Smokies today were Batista, Harmon and Rhoderick.  They may be the best three relief prospects in the system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 17, 2012, 11:30:25 pm
For Curt's sake:  Rizzo is hitting .318 on balls not in play.  A nice way to go.  The guys with 2:1 K/HR rates tend to hit for rather high average, don't they. 

Jackson's HR boosts him to a 12:1 K/HR ratio.  I'd love to see enough HR's to get up into the 7:1 ratio or so. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 18, 2012, 05:18:29 pm
Baez on pace to hit 44 home runs and receive 7 walks over a 162 game season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 18, 2012, 05:21:22 pm
Do they play a 162 game season in the minors?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 18, 2012, 05:24:36 pm
No.  But they could in extended spring training, if they wanted to.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on May 18, 2012, 06:07:54 pm
Rizzo hitting a HR off a lefty - http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?content_id=21542803
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 18, 2012, 08:52:54 pm
AJ Morris is the surgerized pitcher Hendry traded Gorzellany for (along with Burgess.)  He started off rough in April. 

But in his last four games, he's been perfect with 6 K's.  You never know. 

The Cubs reportedly knew he was hurt when they traded for him.  So there were probably some scouting things to like pre-surgery. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 18, 2012, 09:07:21 pm
Szczur: 2-5, 2 SB, PO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_18_dbcafa_pbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 18, 2012, 09:22:06 pm
Hunter Cervenka   1.2 innings   4 hits    4 runs    3 earned    2 walks     0 strikeouts    16.20 ERA.

Marlon Byrd, where are you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 18, 2012, 10:11:50 pm
Rosario: 5-1/3 -6-2-2-1-9


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_18_peoafx_cliafx_1

Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_18_tenaax_msbaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 18, 2012, 10:21:29 pm
Rizzo: 1-5, 2B, K

Jackson: 0-4, 2 K,  (50 Ks leads PCL)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_18_slcaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2012, 08:14:51 am
Rosario has 44K/47 innings, not bad. That's after his first two starts and three of his first four were low K-games.  (1st, 2nd, and 4th starts were each 2K/5IP outings.)  He's 32K/27IP over his last five starts. 

The numbers over that 5 start span are rather odd:  in 27IP/32K/10BB/1HR, those splits are all very solid.  But 36 hits, 35 in play.  That's like a .416 BABIP-against over that span.  That's not likely to sustain. 

So if he can sustain his recent K/BB/HR/GO rate over the rest of the season, I think his numbers could end up looking pretty interesting for 21-year-old with a pretty strong arm. 

Of course, BABIP-against may not be as predictable in A- as in majors.  A guy doesn't get to the majors if he's consistently throwing fastballs down the middle.  And if 40% of his curveballs are fat hangers, he stops throwing them by the time he's a major leaguer, whereas perhaps in A- the organization says to keep throwing them for developmental purposes, but since they're so bad it's not coincidence that hitters rip them at a high rate?  So who knows.  But there's a chance that he might become more interesting than his current 4.37 ERA/1.65 WHIP would suggest. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2012, 11:42:15 am
Scott Maine is 5.79 at Iowa, 6.23 over last 10 appearances. 

8 hits/5 walks over his last 4.2 innings.

Not in a groove right now. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 19, 2012, 03:01:34 pm

Hatley: 2-1-0-0-1-2

Cabrera: 2-3-0-0-0-3, SV


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_19_tenaax_msbaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2012, 04:37:07 pm
Those guys have been pretty good.  Hatley has been very good over his last 9 games (18K/5H/1run/15IP).  Stuff seems to be pretty good, but still has walks, so I'm guessing his control is very much a work in progress. 

Seems like lots of relievers can put together a couple of good weeks at a time, though.  We'll see how these guys hold up longer. 

 

 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 19, 2012, 05:08:08 pm
Frankly, am disappointed that there wasn't a Special BBF All Forum Alert posted yesterday when Baez took his first walk in pro baseball (all kinds of other offensive highlights from Friday's EST game too):

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/05/18/cubs-unleash-wood-diablo-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 19, 2012, 05:13:41 pm
Javier Baez updated EST numbers from the above site:

329/354/711

Not too bad considering that the guy is a bust already.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 19, 2012, 05:16:35 pm
Dumb question that, Reb: is that slash line AVG/OBP/SLG?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2012, 05:52:47 pm
Baez is another example where HR's turn everything.  If Baez hits gobs of HR's, as he has in Mesa, he'll be really good even if he maintains the 30/1 K/BB rate.  He's got a .354 OBP down there because he's hit a bunch of HR's.  Rizzo K's plenty, but he's a great prospect because he HR's a lot.  Jackson's K-rate is up a little, but the main reason he's hitting .235 instead of .285 is because he's not hitting HR's.  Ha and Szczur, neither is looking too compelling.  If they hit some HR's, they'd both command a lot of discussion.  If Vitters hits a bunch of HR's he's serious; if he doesn't he's nothing. 

It's not just slugging that hinges on the HR, average and OBP usually need them too.  And the thing of it is, predicting future HR output is one of the most difficult things to predict.  It's one of the qualities that often does improve a lot with time, but not always.  Will Szczur or Ha grow into 12-15 HR production?  Will Jackson and Vitters be 13-HR guys or a 28-HR guys?  Will Baez be a 15-HR guy or a 35-HR superslugger?  Vogelbach has terrible numbers in Mesa, because he's not hitting any HR's.  If Dunston becomes a 23-HR guy, he's got a chance to be really good; probably not if he's a 7-HR guy.  Geiger, Schlecht, Gretzky, probably the same thing, and Castillo too. 

Can I belabor the obvious or what!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 19, 2012, 06:18:10 pm
Baez certainly appears to have legit offensive talent, but 1 walk and 21 K's in 76 at-bats in Extended is scary. At least Starlin Castro kept his strikeout numbers low in the minors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 19, 2012, 07:00:07 pm
In that cub reporter link, Clevenger will go on a rehab assignment on Monday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 19, 2012, 07:04:56 pm
Yes, BA/OBP/Slugging.

Would like to see Baez assigned to Peoria, rather than Boise.  I guess if that's the plan, it would have happened already.
But, if he hits at Boise, maybe he goes to Peoria in short order.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 19, 2012, 07:25:32 pm
Reb - from what I have heard, the decision of where to start Baez has not yet been made.  He may well start off in Peoria, depending on how Hernandez performs over the next few weeks
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 19, 2012, 07:34:36 pm
Ceasar with his first home run of the season.

Maybe now Craig will get off the poor kid's back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 19, 2012, 08:29:36 pm
Szczur: 2-3, 2B, HR, SF, 2 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_19_dbcafa_pbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 19, 2012, 08:31:23 pm
2/3 with a HR and a double jumps his OBP by 8 and his OPS by 42.  HR's, very nice for stats!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 19, 2012, 08:46:09 pm
Can I belabor the obvious or what!

Yes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 19, 2012, 10:26:12 pm
Jackson: 1-3, 3B, BB, K, PO

Rizzo: 1-3, 2B, BB, K

Rusin: 6-7-3-3-1-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_19_slcaaa_iowaaa_1


Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_19_peoafx_cedafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 20, 2012, 02:21:23 pm
AzPhil has updated all current EST stats:

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/05/20/cubs-2012-extended-spring-training-stats-update-520


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 20, 2012, 02:40:24 pm
AzPhil has updated all current EST stats:

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/05/20/cubs-2012-extended-spring-training-stats-update-520

 DAN VOGELBACH (1B):
183/272/338 (23 GAMES – 85 PA) – 3 2B, 1 3B, 2 HR, 8 RBI, 11 R, 8 BB, 17 K, 1 HBP, 1 SF, 2 GIDP

Those are really some pretty ugly numbers for Vogelbach.

Has anyone heard any speculation as to why he is sucking so badly?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 20, 2012, 04:03:52 pm
Jackson: 1-5, 2B, 3 K,  ( 16 K's last 39 AB's )

Rizzo: 0-3, BB, 2 K

Beliveau: 2-0-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_20_slcaaa_iowaaa_1


McNutt: 5-5-3-1-3-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_20_tenaax_msbaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 20, 2012, 05:32:23 pm
Concepcion: 5-6-4-4-3-2

Wells: 5-4-2-2-0-7, 7-1 GO/FO


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_20_peoafx_cedafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 20, 2012, 06:56:53 pm
Kirk: 2-1/3 IP, 6 R

Torreyes: 0-3  ( 19-120, .447 OPS overall )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_20_dbcafa_pbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 21, 2012, 03:17:52 pm
Jensen: 5-1/3 IP, 2 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_21_peoafx_cedafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 21, 2012, 03:35:21 pm
ArizonaPhil

Of all the position players at Fitch Park, Shawon Dunston Jr has probably shown the most-improvement over the course of 2012 EXST. A month ago I would have said that he will most-likely be left at AZL Cubs when EXST concludes, but now I think he hes a very good chance to go to Boise.

Dunston is aggressive on the bases and in CF (albeit sometimes too aggressive), but is fairly patient at the plate, especially when he is leading off. But what has changed in the last month is that he has stopped trying to pull everything and has finally started to use the whole field.

He has a natural tendency to load up on his back leg and try to pull everything, probably because he has above-average power. He needs to fight that inclination, and he has started to do just that.

He isn't a burner, but he can (and will) steal a base, and he takes two bases at a time on singles to the outfield and can score from 1st on a double.

He doesn't have his father's cannon-arm (it's OK but nothing special). He also needs to improve his tracking skills in the OF.

I think Dunston is emerging as a definite prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 21, 2012, 06:29:44 pm
Dunston is...  fairly patient at the plate

If that description had fit his father, he might be in the HOF right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 21, 2012, 06:36:57 pm
Quote from: Arizona Phil
Javier Baez drove-in six runs with a two-run HR and a grand slam, Yasiel Balaguert knocked-in four runs with a three-run home run and a sacrifice fly, Dong-Yub Kim drove-in two runs with an RBI single and a solo HR, and Wilson Contreras ripped a two-run double, leading the Cubs to a 14-4 demolition of the Angels in Cactus League Extended Spring Training action this morning at Fitch Park Field #3 in Mesa, AZ.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 21, 2012, 07:29:02 pm
Another note from AZ Phil:

"Also, Peoria Chiefs RF Reggie Golden (Cubs 2010 2nd round draft pick) has undergone season-ending surgery for a torn ACL. He injured his knee while running the bases in a MWL game last month. He will be out of action until Minor League Camp (Spring Training) 2013."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 21, 2012, 07:30:41 pm
Vogelbach was 0-3.  Probably the most disappointing prospect right now.  Likely staying in Arizona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 21, 2012, 07:37:11 pm
Vogelbach is surprising.  For a kid who played in best-level Florida baseball, and who was supposedly all about hitting, it's surprising that he can't get any hits.  If you're drafted for your hitting, not because of your speed or defense or athleticism, and then you can't hit, it's not a good sign. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 21, 2012, 07:51:40 pm
Both of Baez' homers were to right-center according to Phil.

Also of note is that Jose Arias continues to impress: 4-4-2-1-1-7
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 21, 2012, 07:56:39 pm
Also, also of note is that Jeimer Candelario -- who is almost exactly a full calendar year younger than Baez -- has been pretty darn good in Arizona after his great DSL season last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 21, 2012, 08:06:20 pm
Another note from AZ Phil:

"Also, Peoria Chiefs RF Reggie Golden (Cubs 2010 2nd round draft pick) has undergone season-ending surgery for a torn ACL. He injured his knee while running the bases in a MWL game last month. He will be out of action until Minor League Camp (Spring Training) 2013."

At least now he will have an excuse for not even getting to Boise this year.

For a 2nd round draft pick not to make it out of extended spring training after three years is not good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 21, 2012, 08:32:00 pm
jes, Golden opened with Peoria and was playing in A-ball this spring before he got hurt.  Granted, he was hitting .192 when he got hurt, but it's not like management didn't think he was ready for full-season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 21, 2012, 08:34:48 pm
Also, also of note is that Jeimer Candelario -- who is almost exactly a full calendar year younger than Baez -- has been pretty darn good in Arizona after his great DSL season last year.

Two things with Candelario that haven't been so good is that his walk-rate has fallen way off.  He walked a bunch in DSL, but very little in Mesa  Also seems the reports on his defense have been scary.  But hit hitting has been very nice. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 21, 2012, 08:47:04 pm
pretty much everyone's defense has been scary in EST (and Phil had Jeimer  with 4 errors, which isn't awful, awful; but maybe he has no range). And it seems unlikely that the amazing plate discipline he had would just disappear. Anyhow, he's really young, and unlike someone like Vogelbach, he's holding his own, which is encouraging.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 21, 2012, 08:48:01 pm
For some reason, everybody walks a lot in the DSL and the walk rate drops dramatically when coming to Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 21, 2012, 09:32:15 pm
Szczur: 2-4, RBI, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_21_sluafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 21, 2012, 09:47:36 pm
jes, Golden opened with Peoria and was playing in A-ball this spring before he got hurt.  Granted, he was hitting .192 when he got hurt, but it's not like management didn't think he was ready for full-season.

Good.  As waek as hitting .192 might be, at least he was in Peoria and not still in extended spring training...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 21, 2012, 10:07:56 pm
B Jackson: 0-5, 4 K   (18 K's last 41 AB's)

J Jackson back in the rotation: 3-9-6-6-1-2, 2 HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_21_tacaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 21, 2012, 10:39:49 pm
Tenn:


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_21_tenaax_msbaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 21, 2012, 11:04:42 pm
Even I'm starting to worry about B-Jax.  That has to be a bad sign.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 21, 2012, 11:26:17 pm
I have to wonder if he's pouting at not being called up when the Cubs traded Marlon Byrd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 22, 2012, 12:49:10 am
I think it is more likely that he is trying to change his swing/judgement/techniques/whatever, and is having trouble adjusting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 22, 2012, 01:45:13 am
If he's f cked up because they tinkered to try and reduce his Ks, that would be incredibly stupid.  It certainly isn't working, in any case.  Hopefully it's not that, and he's just going through his first real slump as a professional.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 22, 2012, 06:59:36 am
30K in 69 May AB's. 

I wonder if he's been something of a smart guess hitter?  If you're guessing and you don't get what you guessed, you can take a lot and run up the long counts, high walks, and high K's that have characterized his output in the lower minors.  That might also fit with a guy who shows a high BABIP, when he gets what he guesses he can hit it pretty hard. 

Some nsbb guys watching games this week said a couple of his K's were on sliders in the dirt. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 22, 2012, 08:16:44 am
I'm also concerned about Jackson. I don't think he's the kind of guy who would "pout" about being sent down though.  If anything, he might be trying too hard to impress.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2012, 09:40:57 am
Iowa has a day game with Tacoma.  Brett Jackson is not in the lineup.  C Brian Esposito must have just been acquired from Salt Lake.  He played last night too.

9  Amezaga
6  Tolbert
DH Clevenger
3  Rizzo
4  Valbuena
5  Vitters
8  Sappelt
2  Esposito
7  Samson

1  Volstad
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2012, 09:43:43 am
Quote
Esposito, who will wear number 32, was a non-roster invitee to Cincinnati Reds major league Spring Training this season, but was released. The Cubs signed him to a minor league contract this week and he joins Iowa from extended spring training.

The veteran backstop spent the 2011 campaign with the Houston Astros organization, hitting a combined .197 with six double, one home run and 11 RBI at Double-A Corpus Christi and Triple-A Oklahoma City.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2012, 10:09:21 am
Quote
RECORD PACE: OF Brett Jackson fanned four times last night, and is 2-for-17 with 10 strikeouts in his last four games. If he were to be with the I-Cubs all season, Jackson is on a pace to have 529 at-bats in 134 games. With a league-high 58 strikeouts in 158 at-bats coming into play today, Jackson is on a pace to strike out 194 times this season. The franchise record for strikeouts in a season is 159, set by Tom Quinlan in 1999. Jai Miller of Sacramento led the league with 179 strikeouts last season. The modern PCL record for strikeouts in a season is 184, set by A.J. Zapp of Tacoma in 2004.
Yes, this I-Cubs item needed a little proof-reading before it was published.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 22, 2012, 11:07:57 am
Espositio was surely signed to make us appreciate Koyie Hill.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 22, 2012, 11:59:33 am
Hayden Simpson is performing as well in relief as he did as a starter.

Talk about consistency.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 22, 2012, 12:15:58 pm
Time to move Torreyes down to Peoria.  He is at 154 and dropping.

Ceasar with two more hits so far today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2012, 12:52:20 pm
Rizzo with another home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 22, 2012, 12:53:50 pm
Szczur walks and scores the winning run in the 10th.  His OBP is up into the .360's, now, 19 SB, average up to .270.  He's clearly been doing relatively well, though, so he's probably due for some slump time soon.  I'm especially pleased to see that he's continued to grind out some SB and walks, though. 

Good debut for Francescon at Daytona.  5K/1BB/3H/6IP.  He seems to be a homer-guy, though. 

AJ Morris two more perfect innings. 

Agree with Dave, I'd think you've got to do something to take Torreyes out of his misery.  He's got 2 singles in 46 AB this month.  Not sure even Frank Castillo could do worse. 

Alcantara with two more errors, he's got 19.  Will be fun to see how many he ends up with. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2012, 01:00:17 pm
(http://api.plixi.com/api/tpapi.svc/imagefromurl?size=medium&url=http%3A%2F%2Flockerz.com%2Fs%2F211033447)


Rizzo's 15th
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 22, 2012, 01:43:35 pm
At some point Rizzo is going to be called up just to provide a distraction from the growing carnage on and off the field, and it's probably going to be soon. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2012, 01:48:09 pm
Iowa and Tacoma are now 12-12 after nine.  Both teams have made five errors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2012, 01:55:37 pm
The Milb scoreboard is wacko.  It doesn't list a pitcher after Volstad who went five and gave up one run on three hits.   And no I-Cubs are listed as having made errors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 22, 2012, 01:59:44 pm
Cactus, that scoreboard is on the fritz. It's actually 15-1 in the 5th. Rizzo just knocked in two more with a single.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 22, 2012, 02:02:39 pm
Playing nine innings in a 12-12 game in under two hours did sound suspicious.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 22, 2012, 02:13:49 pm
The dead even amount of runs, hits and errors would've been quite the coincidence as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 22, 2012, 03:12:02 pm
Rizzo: 3-5, HR, 3 RBI

Vitters: 2-5, 2B, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_22_tacaaa_iowaaa_1


Szczur: 2-4, 2B, RBI, SB, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_22_sluafa_dbcafa_1


Peoria off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 22, 2012, 03:27:23 pm
Szczur walks and scores the winning run in the 10th.  His OBP is up into the .360's, now, 19 SB, average up to .270.  He's clearly been doing relatively well, though, so he's probably due for some slump time soon.  I'm especially pleased to see that he's continued to grind out some SB and walks, though. 

It's hard not to like someone with a 20:25 walk to strikeout ratio.  He's playing in a park that saps his power, and his power probably isn't where it will be in the future anyway.

His season is starting to look very encouraging.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 22, 2012, 06:18:43 pm
Szczur is .316/.400/.526/.926 for his last 10 games, with 1 HR, 4 W, 5 K, 3 SB and 2 CS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 22, 2012, 06:30:18 pm
At some point Rizzo is going to be called up just to provide a distraction from the growing carnage on and off the field, and it's probably going to be soon.

At some point Rizzo is going to be called up just because the Theocracy believe he is ready and is not going to crash and burn as he did last year, and it probably will not be as soon as you would like, but I doubt that pleasing you, or any other fans wanting a bit more excitement, or one or two more wins, this season will play a factor in that decision.

Rizzo right now has a AAA line of .352/.418/.697/1.115.  Last year he had a AAA line of .331/.404/.652/1.056... and when he was called up to the majors in 2011 he has a line of .141/.281/.242/.523 in 153 PA, and he actually did WORSE when he was called back up in September than he did when he was called up initially in June.

I think they are going to be very careful about when they bring him up, and that the expectations of some fans might actually encourage them to wait until September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 22, 2012, 06:37:31 pm
I have to wonder if he's pouting at not being called up when the Cubs traded Marlon Byrd.

Considering that he was doing pretty crappy at that time, he should be considering himself fortunate he was not called up to play in the majors before he had mastered AAA.  Whatever it is he needs to master, it will be much harder for him to do so in Wrigley than in Des Moines.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 22, 2012, 06:39:19 pm
Even I'm starting to worry about B-Jax.  That has to be a bad sign.

His 18 K in his last 41 AB would seem to be a worse sign.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 22, 2012, 06:40:10 pm
I think it is more likely that he is trying to change his swing/judgement/techniques/whatever, and is having trouble adjusting.

I am starting to think the problem may be much more simple -- that he just isn't as good as we thought and hoped.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 22, 2012, 07:12:44 pm
I never considered him to be a top prospect.  But I thought he would perform better than he has so far this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 22, 2012, 08:54:45 pm
EST stats of note from Tuesday:

Candelario: 2-3, 2 2B, RBI, BB

Whitenack: 6-3-1-0-0-7, 2 HB
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 22, 2012, 08:59:26 pm
There haven't been a lot of bright spots in the farm system so far this year other than Rizzo, but Whitenack has been making quite a comeback from his surgery.  He should be up with the Smokies pretty soon, if not Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 22, 2012, 09:08:10 pm
Whitenack's comeback is pretty remarkable.  He was a strike-machine before, and he's come back as a strike-machine again.  At least in Mesa. 

Junior Lake with a HR, and an attempted sacrifice that turned into a bunt single.  His K-rate is a shade under 20%, probably the first time he's ever gone 50-AB into a league with a K-rate that low.  Probably a small-sample fluke, but if he could keep his K-rate down at 20%, he'd have a very good chance. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 22, 2012, 10:55:54 pm
Lake: 3-5, HR, RBI, K, 2 E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_22_tenaax_mobaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 23, 2012, 02:01:33 am
Quote
P.J. Francescon made his FSL debut for the Cubs and the right-hander was in line to get the win after throwing six strong innings. Francescon struck out five, walked one and allowed two runs (one earned) on three hits.

"Francescon really threw well," Harper said. "Everything I was told about him was true -- he competes, he throws strikes, he mixes pitches. He had good numbers (5-1, 1.86 ERA) down in Peoria, and I can see why."

Francescon was promoted from the low-A Peoria Chiefs in the Midwest League to replace Zach Cates, who was sent back to extended spring training after struggling badly (0-6, 10.50 ERA) this season. Cates was acquired from the San Diego Padres in the offseason.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 23, 2012, 06:59:27 am
Fleita often does some roster shuffle in mid/late May like this. 

Whitenack and Franciscon up to Daytona.
They replace Jokisch and Cates.
Peralta goes up to Peoria to replace Franciscon. 
Jokisch goes up to Tennessee replacing Raley. 
Raley goes up to Iowa.  (With Wood, Wells, and Coleman all up in Chicago, that's three of Iowa's original starters, and Volstad replaces only one of them.  I think Jackson has been so horrible that they probably don't want him starting, either.  So Iowa is now probably Rusin, Volstad, Raley, Lopez, and DelaCruz. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 23, 2012, 08:00:36 am
Quote
"Francescon really threw well," Harper said. "Everything I was told about him was true -- he competes, he throws strikes, he mixes pitches. He had good numbers (5-1, 1.86 ERA) down in Peoria, and I can see why."

Apparently Harper wasn't told that he throws hard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 23, 2012, 08:47:24 am
Anyone else sort of envious of Arizona Phil? He goes to baseball games every day. Not bad. Anyhow, he answered a question about Candelario in the comments section of yesterday's game report:

"Jeimer Candelario is a much stronger hitter LH than RH. He really drives the ball left-handed. (He hit a HR onto the roof of the Angels clubhouse at Diablo Park LH last week). I would think he might consider giving up switch-hitting at some point, although it's not because he can't hit RH. It's just that he doesn't drive the ball with the same authority RH.

He has improved a lot defensively at 3B during the course of EXST. He's not Gold Glove, but he has shown significant improvement. Some guys are coachable and some aren't. He is.

Candelario is sort of the exact opposite of Javier Baez, who is VERY emotional on the field but doesn't say much. Candelario (or "Candy" as his teammates call him) doesn't show emotion but he is VERY talkative in the field. You can hear him chirpin' away, shouting encouragement to the pitcher and reminders to the other fielders. He speaks very good English (he grew up in New York City before moving to the Dominican Republic).

He runs O. K. but isn't fast. He also isn't as patient a hitter as you might think he would be given his DSL walk numbers. He's not as hyper-aggressive at the plate as Javier Baez or Neftali Rosario, but he'll swing at the first good pitch he sees.

Overall I would say (as of right now) that Jeimer Candelario is the #2 Cubs prospect at EXST, behind only Javier Baez."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 23, 2012, 08:51:57 am
Overall I would say (as of right now) that Jeimer Candelario is the #2 Cubs prospect at EXST, behind only Javier Baez."

I am not disagreeing at all with that assessment, but what in the world happened to Vogelbach?

Why has he fallen so deep into the crapper?

He and Torreyes were my favorite prospects starting this year, and both are performing as if I cursed them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 23, 2012, 09:10:22 am
Thanks, shasson.  Those comments on Candelerio are very interesting, and very, very encouraging.  A guy who is very talkative and engaged, but not super emotional, that sounds more ideal for a baseball player going through 1500 innings in a season.  And being very coachable, with improving defense, that sounds really good, too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 23, 2012, 09:35:51 am
On the downside, Vogelbach is hitting under the Mendoza line.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 23, 2012, 09:47:01 am
Maybe Candelerio should forget about hitting RHed?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 23, 2012, 10:35:47 am
or maybe Vogelbach should try hitting RH?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 23, 2012, 12:07:47 pm
I am not disagreeing at all with that assessment, but what in the world happened to Vogelbach?

Why has he fallen so deep into the crapper?

He and Torreyes were my favorite prospects starting this year, and both are performing as if I cursed them.

Doesn't that tell you something?  Your backing of McCain is the major reason that Obama is in the White House right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 23, 2012, 12:09:50 pm
For a while in spring training, it was reported that Candelario was only hitting left handed.  He must not have liked the results.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 23, 2012, 01:35:45 pm
Brooks Raley didn't do very well in his first Iowa start giving up five runs on six hits in five innings.

Steve Clevenger is out of the game after going 0-2.  He was behind the plate after DHing yesterday.

Anthony Rizzo has a single in two ABs.

Brett Jackson is 0-2 (both Ks).

The I-Cubs trail 5-1 and are batting in the bottom of the fifth.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 23, 2012, 02:10:19 pm
Anthony Rizzo led off the bottom of the sixth with a homer to left.  #16

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 23, 2012, 03:00:36 pm
Rizzo: 2-4, HR, RBI, K

Jackson: 1-4, 2 K

Vitters: 3-4, 2B, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_23_tacaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 23, 2012, 08:09:01 pm
Apparently Baez is going to Peoria, not Boise.  Whitenack is headed to Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 23, 2012, 09:06:18 pm
Wow (on Baez), cool  (on Whitenack...but hopefully he'll dominate there and go up to AA relatively soon). I would think that Candelario would stay with Arizona Rookie League, or could he go to Boise?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 23, 2012, 09:25:18 pm
Hernandez: 0-3, 2 K, E

Rosario: 3-2/3 IP, 9 R, 3 HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_23_cliafx_peoafx_1


Zych: 2-3-1-1-0-2, BS

Torreyes: 3-3, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_23_sluafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 23, 2012, 09:29:23 pm
I think that Baez/Whitenack info is from a Phil Rogers tweet I read on nsbb ... so ... who knows if he's right.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 23, 2012, 10:01:35 pm
Lake: 2-5, 2B, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_23_tenaax_mobaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 23, 2012, 10:07:41 pm
Baez is still in Mesa for now. He was 1-4 with a K today.

Vogelbach had a double and RBI; also made 2 errors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 23, 2012, 10:14:11 pm
When Junior Lake is one of your better prospects, your system sucks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 23, 2012, 10:32:10 pm
Baez to peoria isn 't unreasonable.  I thought Whitenack might go to Tennessee
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 24, 2012, 08:32:37 am
Quote
@ChiTribRogers SS Javier Baez, the Cubs' 2011 1st-rd pick, is close to being assigned to low-A Peoria out of ext. spring. Rob Whitenack to Daytona soon.


For Whitenack, that decision has been made.  It's "soon" probably only in that he can't pitch for a couple more days, so Daytona may not make the official roster move until the day he's going to pitch, and perhaps he's got a day to organize his stuff before his actual flight. 


But for Baez being "close", has the decision also been already made, or not really?  If so, why would there be any delay, since position guys can play every day?  Just giving him a day or three to move, before making a Peoria roster change?  The decision has already been made, but they want to time it to coincide with Peoria opening a homestand?  Or is Baez "close" unlike Whitenack "soon" in that the Baez decision has not actually been made, it's not a done deal?  Is it a conditional "close" in that "if he keeps crushing the ball like he has recently, then he's getting moved up..."? 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 24, 2012, 02:13:24 pm
Trevor Gretzky interview

http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/2012/05/23/work-ethic-goes-with-gretzky-name
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 24, 2012, 04:00:37 pm
Rizzo: 1-4, 2B, K

Jackson: 2-4, RBI, 0 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_24_tacaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 24, 2012, 04:40:37 pm
Hot streak!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 24, 2012, 06:42:24 pm
Both of Jackson's hits were of the infield variety.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 24, 2012, 09:45:30 pm
Burke: 6-2-1-0-4-4

Hernandez: 2-3, BB, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_24_cliafx_peoafx_1


Lake: 2-4, K, CS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_24_tenaax_mobaax_1


Simpson: 2-1/3 -4-1-1-4-1, 2 Balks

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_24_sluafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 24, 2012, 10:01:17 pm
As always, thanks Chris.

Adduci always seems to be hitting .300 in whatever league.    I'm wondering if this guy might end up being a big leaguer...he's fast and a pretty good fielder, too, as i recall.

Anyone with good scouting information re Adduci?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 24, 2012, 10:34:42 pm
He is even showing a little bit of power this year.  The lack of power has always been the biggest slam against him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 25, 2012, 07:55:16 am
Adduci's an organizational player.  Not a prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 25, 2012, 09:55:11 am
Going back to the Gretzky interview....am trying to think of an example of the son of a great professional athlete in one sport excelling in a different sport than dad. But can't really think of anything notable. (for instance, Kenny Williams' son is an NFL player, but neither are super-star types). Are there examples where both the old man and kid were great, but at different sports?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 25, 2012, 10:02:17 am
Going back to the Gretzky interview....am trying to think of an example of the son of a great professional athlete in one sport excelling in a different sport than dad. But can't really think of anything notable. (for instance, Kenny Williams' son is an NFL player, but neither are super-star types). Are there examples where both the old man and kid were great, but at different sports?

Calvin and Grant Hill

http://sports.espn.go.com/sportsnation/news/story?id=1601692
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 25, 2012, 10:05:58 am
ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @peoriachiefs Chiefs add RHP Felix Pena from EXT (3-2, 6.92 ERA,1 sv in 2011).And Cuban born OF Yasiel Balaguert who will make pro debut.

11m ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @peoriachiefs Friday Roster Moves: LHP Jeff Lorick (0-0, 0.52, 6 sv) and C Taylor Davis (.338,1 hr, 12 rbi) on promotions to @DaytonaCubs

 
12m ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @eddymk Cubs sign SS/3B Diory Hernandez, whom the Astros released last week. Batted .159/.240/.159 (50 PA) for Okla City this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 25, 2012, 10:30:21 am
Calvin and Grant Hill

http://sports.espn.go.com/sportsnation/news/story?id=1601692

Yep, you beat me to it.

I believe David Robinson's son is going to play football at Notre Dame, but I don't know if the son is any good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 25, 2012, 10:33:22 am
Ken Norton and Ken Norton, Jr.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 25, 2012, 10:40:12 am
Thanks  Cactus, that's exactly the type of thing I couldn't think of!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jack Birdbath on May 25, 2012, 10:52:28 am
Yep, you beat me to it.

I believe David Robinson's son is going to play football at Notre Dame, but I don't know if the son is any good.

If he's playing at ND, it's obvious that he's no good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 25, 2012, 11:09:08 am
Going back to the Gretzky interview....am trying to think of an example of the son of a great professional athlete in one sport excelling in a different sport than dad. But can't really think of anything notable. (for instance, Kenny Williams' son is an NFL player, but neither are super-star types). Are there examples where both the old man and kid were great, but at different sports?

Probably before your time, but there was an outstanding quarterback named Tobin Rote who had a son who became an outstanding soccer player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 25, 2012, 11:31:30 am
Kyle Rote, the receiver, not Tobin.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on May 25, 2012, 12:38:09 pm
Yannick and Joakim Noah
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 25, 2012, 12:43:00 pm
Don and Corey Patterson
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 25, 2012, 12:43:29 pm
OK maybe those guys don't really count as "great", though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 25, 2012, 01:02:44 pm
Kyle Rote, the receiver, not Tobin.

Right

The son of Kyle Rote, an all-American college football player at Southern Methodist University who played in the National Football League for the New York Giants, Rote, Jr. graduated from Highland Park High School in Dallas, TX in 1968.[1] He played for the Fort Worth Bandits in the Dallas youth soccer league while in high school. He attended Oklahoma State University, initially intending to concentrate on American football. He played soccer to stay in shape during the offseason, but after a broken leg ended his football career, he started playing it full-time. Rote transferred to the University of the South in Sewanee, Tennessee, then one of the few universities in the South with a varsity soccer program. While at Sewanee, Rote also competed in track and field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 25, 2012, 01:16:26 pm
I remember Kyle Rote Jr....was his career around the time of the New YorkCosmos with Pele?

The Noahs are a cool father/son combo in terms of their chosen sports. And their hair.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 25, 2012, 01:23:00 pm
And, of course, there was Wilt Chamberlain, who was a basketball star, that then went on in a later life, to be a volleyball champion.  And, if I remember right, he also tried his hand at boxing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on May 25, 2012, 01:51:57 pm
...and screwing anything that walked
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 25, 2012, 02:04:01 pm
Thanks for the reality check re Adduci, JR...it's the deflation of unreasonably high expectations that seems to hurt the most.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 25, 2012, 08:01:58 pm
Rodrigo Lopez threw one pitch and left tonight's Iowa game in Memphis.

Anthony Rizzo is not in the lineup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 25, 2012, 08:25:43 pm
Rizzo apparently getting a scheduled day off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 25, 2012, 09:26:32 pm
Kirk: 8-7-0-0-0-4

Zych: 1-3-2-2-0-1, BS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_25_clrafa_dbcafa_1


Peralta: 4 IP, 1 R


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_25_cliafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 25, 2012, 10:02:56 pm
Jokisch AA debut: 5-1-2-2-1-3

Cabrera: 2-1-1-1-0-2, SV

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_25_tenaax_mobaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 25, 2012, 10:17:30 pm
Jackson: 0-2, SF, RBI, BB, K

Vitters: 1-2, BB, HBP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_25_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 26, 2012, 05:10:24 pm
Jeff Beliveau and Blake DeWitt are on the DL at Iowa.

SS Diory Hernandez joins the I-Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2012, 07:11:06 pm
Rogers was right about Baez. He's been promoted to Peoria although he's not playing tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 26, 2012, 07:38:23 pm
Jackson and Clevenger have homered off Shelby Miller...2-1 Iowa over Memphis after 4 1/2.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 26, 2012, 08:33:25 pm
Jackson and Clevenger have homered off Shelby Miller...2-1 Iowa over Memphis after 4 1/2.

What happened to Shelby Miller? 

He was suppose to be the next great thing, and I was dreading him making it to the majors and dominating the Cubs for the next decade.  Walks(4.1 per 9 innings) and hits(11 per 9 innings) are up tremendously though his k rate is still above 1/inning.  whip of 1.682 this year with a 4.30 era before tonight.  His HR rate was 1.4 per 9 innings after being .3 last year between high A and AA.

I would guess his velocity is way down, but the question is how much and why?  Anyone heard or know?  I guess it could be a bad stretch, but that just seems unlikely. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2012, 09:07:54 pm
Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_26_clrafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2012, 09:26:15 pm
Rizzo: 2-4. HR, RBI, E,   (broke 4-4 tie with HR in 8th)

Jackson: 2-4, 3B, HR, 2 RBI, 0 K

Vitters: 1-2, HR, RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_26_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1


Hernandez: 2-3, 3B, HR, RBI

Concepcion: 4-2/3 -12-8-5-1-4, 2 HR, 2 WP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_26_wisafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on May 26, 2012, 09:31:07 pm
Vitters having a very nice couple of weeks.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 26, 2012, 10:04:52 pm
Vitters having a very nice couple of weeks.



I looked up his profile to check his game log yesterday, because I had been thinking the same thing.  Hopefully, he's finally adjusted to AAA and he continues to uptick. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2012, 10:36:54 pm
Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_26_tenaax_mobaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2012, 10:48:01 pm
Baez isn't quite with Peoria yet since he played in EST today. Maybe he's headed there.

Sat EST:


Baez: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, SB, E

Vogelbach: 0-1, 2 BB

Candelario: 1-3, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, K

Dunston: 2-4, 3B, RBI

Amaya: 1-3, BB, 2 SB

Bogaerts: 1-3, HR, 3 RBI
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 26, 2012, 10:52:08 pm
AzPhil also notes that the EST players faced each other in intra-squad games Thursday and Friday.

Baez tripled and homered in his two at-bats on Thursday, but K'd in both his AB's Friday.

Vogelbach walked all four of his PA's and stole a base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 26, 2012, 10:56:10 pm
Quote
Concepcion: 4-2/3 -12-8-5-1-4, 2 HR, 2 WP

Ugh, that's $6 million that could have been a lot better spent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 26, 2012, 11:59:54 pm
Clevenger just continues to hit ... 3 for 3.  Batting .500 in his 10ABs w/ 2 doubles and 1HR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 27, 2012, 12:06:42 am
That Concepcion contract had better be in some way connected to getting Soler b/c otherwise, this new regime doesn't appear too smart.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 27, 2012, 01:15:18 am
I suspect that Concepcion's deal was an important element of the Cubs' not-yet-finalized deal for Soler. It put some money in the pockets of his agent and his buscones to tide them over until Soler actually becomes a resident and a free agent and can negotiota a contract. My understanding is that this is a common practice in the Dominican Republic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 27, 2012, 01:56:34 am
Beliveau has a left shoulder strain which doesn't sound good although his DL stint is backdated.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 27, 2012, 02:02:41 am
Some highlights from Saturday's Chiefs game including Marco Hernandez' homer and triple:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcUBeD0M8i0&feature=plcp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 27, 2012, 07:53:02 am
Vogelbach walked all four of his PA's and stole a base.

Considering how low his BA and OPS have been, it is at least encouraging that Vogelbach appears to remain disciplined and the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 27, 2012, 02:45:57 pm
The Cubs need to give Gerardo Concepcion a chance to pitch against Dale Sweum's right-handed lineup. If that doesn't restore his confidence, nothing will. They may as well let Hayden Simpson take a crack at them, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 27, 2012, 04:50:50 pm
Jensen: 6-4-1-1-2-8


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_27_wisafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 27, 2012, 05:24:17 pm
The Cubs need to give Gerardo Concepcion a chance to pitch against Dale Sweum's right-handed lineup. If that doesn't restore his confidence, nothing will. They may as well let Hayden Simpson take a crack at them, too.

LOL!  Awesome!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 27, 2012, 05:31:01 pm
@Kevin_Goldstein Ok, real Cubs news. RHP Dillon Maples had elbow soreness, is on throwing program, and on pace to be ready when short-season leagues begin.

Elbow soreness?  Get the TJ surgery out of the way now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 27, 2012, 06:24:44 pm



Daytona Cubs Baseball Organization (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Daytona-Cubs-Baseball-Organization/136796367780) 3 hours ago ·
WEATHER UPDATE: Tonight's game has been cancelled due to rain. The game will not be made up, as it would have been the last meeting between the Cubs and Threshers in the first half. Reading Night tickets can be redeemed on June 8th or can be used as a rain out ticket. The next Cubs' home game is on Thursday at 7:05 p.m. Stay dry and enjoy the long weekend![/size]

[/size]
Daytona Cubs Baseball Organization (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Daytona-Cubs-Baseball-Organization/136796367780) · 6 hours ago · It is a beautiful day at Jackie Robinson Ballpark with the sun shining... the forecast has pushed the landfall of the storm back to tomorrow and we're planning on playing at 6:35pm as scheduled! Stay tuned for updates throughout the day.
[/l]
[/size][/font][/color]
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 27, 2012, 08:05:46 pm
Rizzo pinch-hit for in the 6th tonight. No reason given yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 27, 2012, 08:22:42 pm
Rizzo pinch-hit for in the 6th tonight. No reason given yet.
Rizo reportedly left the dugout and headed to the clubhouse.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 27, 2012, 08:25:02 pm
He's probably asked for a trade...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 27, 2012, 09:23:53 pm
Rizzo: left with wrist soreness; 1-3, 2B, 2 RBI, K

Jackson: 1-5, SB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_27_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1


Tennessee off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 28, 2012, 01:07:17 am
Arizona Phil on Baez/Castro and SS:

Sun, 05/27/2012 - 4:43pm — Arizona Phil
Re: Bogaerts Knows How to Whistle, Blows Out Three-Run Blast ...

Having seen Starlin Castro play SS, 2B, and 3B extensively at EXST, AZL CUBS, and AZ Instructs in 2008, absolutely no doubt his best position is 2B (he is actually an above-average defensive 2B). and if you ask them, you will find that the Cubs minor league infield instructors who have worked one-on-one with Castro will agree.

That said, Castro CAN play SS (it's just that he's better at 2B), and there is no reason to move him at this time unless the Cubs want to switch Castro and Barney, but then Barney is the Cubs #1 SS until whenever Baez arrives.

As for Javier Baez, reports that he would have to be moved to 3B just don't jibe with his play at SS at EXST. He does make too many careless errors because he plays too fast and tries to do too much, but he has the range and arm to play SS, and he also has the leadership & field command presence preferred in a SS (like a point guard in basketball). Baez is Derrick Rose. Castro is Carmelo Anthony.

Pre-draft reports that Baez would have to move to 3B in pro ball are puzzling, because if they were both on the same team right now, Baez would push Castro to another position (not the other-way around).

The player that Baez reminds me of (at a similar age) would be Alex Rodriguez, but without A-Rod's patience at the plate. Baez hates to take a walk, and he needs to work on learning to let pitches that are out of the strike-zone go by.

Baez is high-strung and sometimes even combative, and he is hyper-aggressive at the plate, on the bases, and in the field, but his bat-speed and HR power are very rare, and he has the speed to steal 20-30 bases.

Nobody worked harder in EXST pre-game (early morning) BP, infield, and base-running drills than Javier Baez. He pushes himself very hard and expects others around him to do the same.

Baez also does not suffer fools or bad baseball easily, and he is the kind of player who will not accept losing.

What really impressed me with Baez was how he handled his 0-20 slump (with ten K) after beginning the Cactus League EXST season hitting for the cycle versus the Angels and going 9-15 with three doubles, with triples, and three HR in his first 15 PA.

His 0-20 (10-K) slump was caused by him trying to pull everything and pulling off the ball, and so other teams suckered him and made him look foolish with a steady diet of breaking balls. But then he made an adjustment and began to intentionally hit every pitch back through the box (sometimes nearly taking the pitcher's head-off in the process), cutting his power numbers down for a while. But it got him back on track, and he hit two gargantuan 420-ft+ home runs over the right-centerfield fence and onto Field #5 (the half-field infield) located north of the clubhouse at Fitch Park last week (with Oneri Fleita watching).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 28, 2012, 01:51:20 am
Marco Hernandez goes down to Mesa to make room for Baez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 28, 2012, 07:20:48 am
Thanks, Reb, for the very interesting report on Baez (and Castro) by Arizona Phil.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on May 28, 2012, 08:25:14 am
I pray to goc that azphil knows his scouting. The player Baez most reminds him of is ARod? He doesn't look like he'll have to move off SS? Leadership skills and work ethic of Rose? Wow. Was he also born of a virgin?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 28, 2012, 09:07:50 am
I pray to goc that azphil knows his scouting. The player Baez most reminds him of is ARod? He doesn't look like he'll have to move off SS? Leadership skills and work ethic of Rose? Wow. Was he also born of a virgin?

Forget about the other things Phil mentioned, or the speculation of his parentage, I am far more impressed by the fact that the kid very quickly, and effectively, adjusted his approach at the plate when the pitchers changed the way they were pitching him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 28, 2012, 10:12:40 am
Interesting thoughts by Phil.  That's pretty exciting/encouraging.  The sense that he's a true shortstop tools-wise, that his high volume of errors don't strike as prohibitive, that he is a super hard worker, and that he burns to succeed/win are each very meaningful.  Even the stuff about 20-SB speed is a pleasant surprise.  Having a player with both extraordinary tools and an extraordinary fire to get the best out of them is a very special combination. 

Several cautions to myself:
1.  Players sometimes change.  That includes Castro.
2.  Players don't always change./improve.  Some guys don't keep improving after age 19 the way that the HOFers do.  "Being reminded of" and/or "at a certain age" is how Ronny Cedeno compares to Jeter, Luis Montanez reminded of ARod, Pat Tabler reminds of Mike Schmidt, Andy Sisco way ahead of Randy Johnson, etc..   There are dozens of teenagers who look gifted but make errors; only a few become defensively reliable Jeter/Omar/Ozzie SS's. 
4.  Arod is hyperbole.  The only times in his career when ARod went through 100-PA period with as many K's as Baez has had in XSL, was when Arod was the same age but was in the majors.  ARod was dominating AAA at 18/19, and getting promoted to the American League.  Baez is 19, he's getting promoted to A-. 
5.  Being like Arod "without the patience" is no small "without". 
6.  Pitch recognition can improve some with time, but to limited degree.  It's a gift/tool.  If Baez lacks patience now, and strikes out 20-30% of the time against XST pitchers, there are probably some pitch recognition/response tools that stars have that he will probably always need to play without. 

But, it's going to be really fun to see how he develops.  Hopefully the defense works out well, at least some of the power carries over to Peoria, and the patience/pitch-recognition issues develop favorably. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 28, 2012, 10:21:51 am
Peoria Chiefs lineup

4   DeVoss 
9   Easterling 
5   Darvill 
DH Hoilman 
3   Cuneo 
6   Baez 
7   Zapata 
2   Cabezas 
8   Chen 8

1  Rosario
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 28, 2012, 11:25:30 am
Well happily, wrist problems are nothing to worry about for a hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 28, 2012, 12:11:56 pm
Never would have happened if the Theocracy had called him up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 28, 2012, 02:01:18 pm
1B Josh Vitters has homered in the second inning to give Iowa a 1-0 lead.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 28, 2012, 02:04:17 pm

Pregame notes:


Quote
VITTING FRENZY: 3B Josh Vitters went 2-for-5 last night elevating his season average to .270. The two-time Cubs top minor league prospect according to Baseball America is hitting .351 (13-for-37) with one homer, four RBI and 4 runs scored in his last 10 games. In the last five games Vitters has slugged one homer, knocked in two RBI and scored once while batting .412 (7-for-17). He is coming off of his second seven-game hit streak that ended on May 23.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 28, 2012, 02:19:48 pm
It seems to take Vitters about a month and a half to two months after each promotion to start hitting at each new level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 28, 2012, 02:31:09 pm
Baez with a single in his first at bat, but is thrown out trying to make it a double
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 28, 2012, 04:16:35 pm
Jackson: 2-4, 3B, RBI, SB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_28_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 28, 2012, 04:18:16 pm
It seems to take Vitters about a month and a half to two months after each promotion to start hitting at each new level.

Yep...i just hope he get's the patience he's going to need at the major league level once he's promoted to work things out...I'd guess theo's noticed that pattern, however, and will be prepared to give him that time.  I'd like to see him get called up when rosters expand to go ahead and give him a taste of big league life and pitchers, assuming he is hitting well at that end of the year, and get that adjustment process started.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 28, 2012, 04:37:00 pm
Baez: 2-4

Rosario: 7-3-1-1-0-7

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_28_wisafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 28, 2012, 04:37:34 pm
Judging from how Stewart is doing, it is not as if Vitters should have too much trouble getting playing time when he does get called up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 28, 2012, 04:41:29 pm
All four balls Baez hit today were to right field: two line singles, a grounder to second, and a flyout to right.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 28, 2012, 06:51:32 pm
EST:

Dunston: 2-3, HR, RBI, BB

Vogelbach: 1-2, HBP, E

Scott: 3-1/3 IP, 9 R (6 ER)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 28, 2012, 07:04:11 pm
Nice to see Baez start fast with a couple of hits and no K's.  Vitters OPS is up to .767.  His highest full-season OPS has been .770.  He's K'd at a high rate (for Vitters) this month (20 in May, in 99 AB), and his walks are down as usual (5 in May).  But when you hit 6 HR's in a month, a rising HR tide carries all stats, or something like that. 

He's due for a slump.  He had many times last year when I thought he was getting something going, and if he keeps it up he can hit .300 or OPS at .800 or whatever, and of course that never sustained, and I doubt this will either. 

Not sure how his 3B defense is doing.  He's got 6 errors, which is second on the team only to Rizzo (7).  Is 6 a prohibitively bad pace?  Or not that bad? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 28, 2012, 09:03:48 pm
From Phil's reports, Dunston has been on a roll lately.  Gretzky has also seemed to be getting on base regularly, looks like an interesting prospect.  When the Cubs picked him and signed him, my understanding was that they projected him as a power-hitter.  No hint of that power yet, though. 

They also had a surprising signing of a pitcher Arturo Maltos-Garcia who was injured and needed TJ surgery, but had had some very nice JC numbers and seemed to have a good scouting report.  Phil's had him pitching several times this month, 2K's in 1.1 today.  Phil says he's low 90's fastball with a curveball that's his K-pitch.  If he's low-90's less than one year since surgery, that's pretty good.  So I'll be interested.  Phil says he's short and looks like a reliever prospect, 2-pitch guy. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 28, 2012, 09:49:29 pm
Rhee: 2-1/3 -9-7-7-2-0 ,  1 K last 12-2/3 IP

Antigua: 3-2/3 -1-0-0-1-5


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_28_hunaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 28, 2012, 11:11:51 pm
Mocks seem to say that Appel/Gausman will be gone before # 6.  Not sure if Zimmer or Fried is worth taking at #6 but I hope Cubs don't bypass a more worthy position player just because of pitching need--- take three pitchers with sandwich picks and second rounder if pitching hungry. Guessing arms will be there between 35-55 picks. 

Kind of hoping Cubs can snare either Zunino, Correa, or Almora if neither Appel nor Gausman falls to # 6.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 28, 2012, 11:40:33 pm
It's not as if the Cubs don't desperately need position players, too.  BPA all the way, with Wilken tied up in a closet somewhere - that's the way to go.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 28, 2012, 11:49:43 pm
Mocks seem to say that Appel/Gausman will be gone before # 6.  Not sure if Zimmer or Fried is worth taking at #6 but I hope Cubs don't bypass a more worthy position player just because of pitching need--- take three pitchers with sandwich picks and second rounder if pitching hungry. Guessing arms will be there between 35-55 picks. 

Kind of hoping Cubs can snare either Zunino, Correa, or Almora if neither Appel nor Gausman falls to # 6.

I definitely agree...I'm hoping for Almora if Gausman is gone...Appel's college usage scares me and Fried seems like a loogy candidate.  Zunino's contact problems have been well documented here. 

I think the arm centric draft is probably best in a weak draft like this, not even taking into consideration the fact the cubs need pitching.  Also been brought up here, but pitchers are lottery tickets whereas position players are pretty much what you see is what you hope you get.  Much less room for jumps in potential like pitchers.  I wouldn't be opposed to taking position players with 3 of first 4 or 4 of first 5 picks and then going pitching crazy if the positional talent is equal.  I realize this probably won't happen, but it's just my current philosophy.

I also think a pitcher taken in the first 3/4 rounds needs to bring heat.  I don't get taking finesse pitchers that high and it always seems like quite a few go up there.   You can get finesse guys later, but it seems your much less likely to get the all-star position player.

Also seems like pitching is easier to get at the major league level now, compared to plus position players.  It's the polar opposite of this time last decade.

You go back over past drafts and it seems like first basemen are the most likely to translate into major league production, so the right one somewhere in the supplemental or second round would make a good investment.  Hopefully, if Rizzo and/or Vogelbach make it, he'd make good trade bait in the future.

Of course, I also think it's easier to build around a durable all-star pitching staff(is there such a thing?), so that belief goes against everything I just wrote.
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on May 28, 2012, 11:56:46 pm
The top prospect I want the least is Zunino. So he'll either be a frequent All-Star for some other team or a complete bust for the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 29, 2012, 12:10:40 am
Seems like at 6 there's going to be some very good prospects, and whoever we get will have a chance to become very valuable.  But whoever we get will also have significant risk.  Zunino might be a K-machine who never walks, and outside of Florida's stadium won't hit HR's.  Maybe Zimmer won't really have that good of a fastball, not enough life or speed, to be very special.  Appel will be wild.  Corea will be wiped out by curveballs.  Almora will hit no HR's and his leg kick will kill him.  No sure things at 6, but all guys who could become really useful if things work out. 

I'm always a position-first guy with a very high pick, and #6 qualifies.  So unless there's a pitcher they really love, all ties go to a player in my book at #6.  I agree with reb, once their in the 43-101 range, that's a good place to grab some pitchers who have plenty of potential.  Also agree with ray, if 3 or even 4 of the first 101 picks are players, that's good with me, then stock up with pitchers from rounds 4 and up.  There are still some ver good arms available, and who knows which ones might be a grip change and stride adjustment away from becoming really really good.  Should be fun. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2012, 01:20:45 am
Quote
Baez was not shy about swinging, either. He looked at just three pitches, two balls and a called strike on the first pitch he saw.

“That’s what we want to see, if you get your pitch, swing.” Chiefs manager Casey Kopitzke said. “You saw that in the ninth. He’s going to be aggressive and go get it. It’s fun to see.”

....


During batting practice, Baez hit three tape-measure home runs, including one that cleared the batter’s eye in straight-away center field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 29, 2012, 07:25:55 am
“That’s what we want to see, if you get your pitch, swing.” Chiefs manager Casey Kopitzke said. “You saw that in the ninth. He’s going to be aggressive and go get it. It’s fun to see.”


Yea, the new regime is really impressing the prospects with the importance of working counts and grinding out those ABs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 29, 2012, 08:44:43 am
I think you missed the point..."If you get YOUR pitch, swing..."

Saying that, there will likely be a few guys exempt from the normal rules...most will need to display decent plate discipline to advance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 29, 2012, 09:36:35 am
"He's going to be **aggressive** and go get it.  It's fun to see."  ben, there is no reason to think the new regime has any new approach or new message to hitters than the old regime.  The principle that you should swing at your pitch and be aggressive is on Page 1 of the Cubs Way, as written by Jim Hendry in 1996.  Why do you think the new regime is going to get any different or better results, hitting-wise, when it's the same message, the same approach, and the same coaches selling the same message?  Kopitzke, a graduate of the Cubs system, is celebrating exactly the same values that he grew up with in the Cubs system.  What's actually changed, that should make any difference in the outcome? 

(Well, one practical change, of course, is that they should get a series of super-high first-round draft choices for a few years.  Hendry's one big season rested on the contributions of super-high picks Wood and Prior, and half a year of Corey.  )   

"He's going to be **aggressive** and go get it.  It's fun to see."  Hendry and Fleita have strongly supported "being aggressive".  I wonder, are there really big-league hitting prospects who suffer from not being aggressive enough and need that to be celebrated/reinforced?  Being aggressive and swinging, that is first instinct when a kid starts playing baseball.  It's an unneeded message.  Having the discipline to refrain from swinging too much is much more difficult than not swinging enough.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 29, 2012, 09:46:05 am
I think you missed the point..."If you get YOUR pitch, swing..."

Saying that, there will likely be a few guys exempt from the normal rules...most will need to display decent plate discipline to advance.

Cling to that belief.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 29, 2012, 12:23:03 pm
The "Cubs Way" under Epstein IS different and will come to fruition down the road...it will feature more guys grinding out ABs than in the MacPhail/Hendry regimes and, also, pitchers who also control the strike zone better...book it.

That will result from FAR more players drafted/procured who have the right kind of approach/skills, as well as that Cub development/advancement will increasingly focus on those qualities.

There may be some outliers (e.g. possibly Baez) who advance because of other plus qualities, but most will internalize the clear message..."my MLB career depends on my ability to grind away each AB."   

That's not the message minors players had in the past...that's not what we've seen from our MLB teams in the past...it WILL change...in time.

Rome wasn't built in a day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on May 29, 2012, 12:40:50 pm
The major league hitting coach also has to espouse that philosophy.  That obviously isn't the case with Jaramillo. 

His rep was built primarily in a hitter's park with a lot of talented hitters.  It hasn't translated to the Cubs.

Is this the last year of his contract?  Even if it isn't, I wouldn't be surprised to see him reassigned.  We will have a different hitting coach next year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 29, 2012, 01:02:43 pm
most will internalize the clear message..."my MLB career depends on my ability to grind away each AB."   

Or maybe most will internalize the clear message..."“That’s what we want to see, if you get your pitch, swing....   be aggressive and go get it.”"   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on May 29, 2012, 01:11:50 pm
Those who don't swing at their pitch if and when they get it might not get it again.

When you get your pitch, you rip it...doesn't matter what the count is...

The key is having the patience to know the difference between your pitch and a pitcher's pitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 29, 2012, 02:17:16 pm
Those who don't swing at their pitch if and when they get it might not get it again.

When you get your pitch, you rip it...doesn't matter what the count is...

The key is having the patience to know the difference between your pitch and a pitcher's pitch.

I believe this is the approach that hitters are taught even by coaches who place a strong value on OBP.  Jaramillo (and most, if not all, hitting coaches) teach batters to look for pitches they can drive and go after those.

It seems to be a common view among some or maybe many sabremetric oriented fans that players should not do this. I guess the view is that players should take pitches to get deep in the count regardless of where the pitch is?  I don't think I've ever heard a single professional baseball person take that position.  As Dave said, you may only get one good pitch to hit in an at bat, so I think every coach/player/exec believes that you should be aggressive in going after a pitch that is "your" pitch. 

The problem with too many Cub hitters over the years has been that they've been aggressive in going after pitches if they were anywhere in the strike zone (or too often, even outside the zone).  Sveum is unhappy with Cub hitters being too aggressive at the plate, in swinging at pitches that are NOT good pitches to drive.  The solution to this is to be more selective about which pitches you go after - not to take pitches regardless of where they are - whether it's the first pitch or even a 3-0 pitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 29, 2012, 02:43:07 pm
Well said, Ron.

No one (certainly not the new leaders) are suggesting that players don't go aggressively after pitches in THEIR hitting zone...the key is finding and/or developing hitters who know the difference between their zone and the pitcher's zone and who have the discipline to execute MOST of the time.

It's gonna take time to field more of those players, but that's CLEARLY what Theo et al are trying to do...Stewart may or may not make it, Rizzo may or may not make it, but CLEARLY they are going after guys who have more of those characteristics...that will continue...they will draft them, they will acquire them and, over time, they will develop them.    None of this will happen overnight.   Be patient.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 29, 2012, 03:35:12 pm
I believe this is the approach that hitters are taught even by coaches who place a strong value on OBP.  Jaramillo (and most, if not all, hitting coaches) teach batters to look for pitches they can drive and go after those.....The problem with too many Cub hitters over the years has been that they've been aggressive in going after pitches if they were anywhere in the strike zone .....  The solution to this is to be more selective about which pitches you go after - not to take pitches regardless of where they are - whether it's the first pitch or even a 3-0 pitch.

Does Theo and the new regime provide any edge as regards hitting, and if so what and when?  Most if not all coaches teach to drive pitches you can drive.  Hendry's people did, now they are Theo's people and they teach the same thing.

So how/where does Theo and his team add any competitive advantage? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on May 29, 2012, 03:40:17 pm
Now it's called the "Cubs Way."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 29, 2012, 03:59:06 pm
Does Theo and the new regime provide any edge as regards hitting, and if so what and when?  Most if not all coaches teach to drive pitches you can drive.  Hendry's people did, now they are Theo's people and they teach the same thing.

So how/where does Theo and his team add any competitive advantage? 

I don't think anyone here is in a position to say exactly what the differences, on the ground, are between how players will be coached under this regime.  I do have the impression that there is a more explicit, consistent philosophy in play by the new guys, as to what they look for from all of their players.  And I also have the impression that there is more of a, or a deeper, belief in the value of OBP and perhaps of greater selectivity at the plate.  Baseball, it seems to me, is not only a game of inches, but a game of nuance.  Just because the Hendry era and the Theo era are not polar opposites doesn't mean there is no significant difference, particularly after only 1/3 of a season.

I also would expect that this is a transitional year as far as evaluating current personnel throughout the organization.  There was no way every minor league manager and coach was going to be replaced the first few months after Theo as hired.  I imagine there will be guys who have adapted to the explicit expectations that Theo/Jed have laid out, are laying out and will lay out. I imagine there will be those who do not.  And presumably the first group will stay, if effective, and the second group will not.

I mean, Jeez, wasn't it clear from the beginning that this was going to take some time.  This ain't a computer game - it's real life with real people.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on May 29, 2012, 04:09:18 pm
Ron gets it...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 29, 2012, 04:53:07 pm
Once you demonstrate a willingness to extend the strike zone, you're rarely going to get a pitch to drive.  You have to play cat and mouse with the pitcher.  Hacking away is pretty much doomed to failure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 29, 2012, 04:53:12 pm
There was no way every minor league manager and coach was going to be replaced the first few months after Theo as hired.

Weren't there actually fewer replacements than in a normal year under Hendry?

I imagine there will be guys who have adapted to the explicit expectations that Theo/Jed have laid out, are laying out and will lay out.

That is a comforting belief to have... even if it does not square with what we have heard from Sveum about his interview, or what he have heard from the pitching coach about sabermetrics.

But I'm sure such things are meaningless.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 29, 2012, 04:55:19 pm
Once you demonstrate a willingness to extend the strike zone, you're rarely going to get a pitch to drive.  You have to play cat and mouse with the pitcher.  Hacking away is pretty much doomed to failure.

To be fair, I am not sure that telling hitters to be aggressive with a pitch they can drive or which is "their pitch" equates to "hacking away" or demonstrates any "willingness to extend the strike zone."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 29, 2012, 05:00:30 pm
Very well said once again, Ron...it's gonna take time...unfortunately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 29, 2012, 05:29:53 pm
Do you mean, Ben, it's going to take time for some on these boards to understand what Ron said? Because, Dave23 is right on, that Ron gets it. Others don't get it, yet. c'est la vie.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 29, 2012, 06:28:49 pm
Shasson, after what incredibly loyal, enthusiastic Cub fans have been through in recent years/decades, it's most understandable that it will take time for many, if not most, to believe.
In fact, some skepticism of the new regime is probably healthy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 29, 2012, 06:43:52 pm
Shasson, after what incredibly loyal, enthusiastic Cub fans have been through in recent years/decades, it's most understandable that it will take time for many, if not most, to believe.
In fact, some skepticism of the new regime is probably healthy.

For some of us that constitutes discussing the Theocracy without using a single exclamation point....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 29, 2012, 06:47:22 pm
Still no Rizzo

8  Jackson
7  Amezaga
6  Valbuena
DH Wright 
3  Vitters
9  Sappelt
5  Hernandez 
2  Esposito
4  Tolbert

1  Rusin
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2012, 08:11:16 pm
Not a very encouraging return for Whitenack.


Whitenack: 4-1/3 -10-4-3-1-0


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_29_dbcafa_breafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 29, 2012, 08:38:36 pm
Game not done yet, but Vitters with two hits including a HR.  His highest full-seasonal OPS in his career has been .770.  I think he's probably up around .790 now at Iowa, for the moment.  Nice to see. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2012, 09:20:40 pm
Struck: 6-3-0-0-1-9

Lake: 2-4, 2B, K, E

Francescon


Francescon: 6-8-5-5-3-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_29_dbcafa_breafa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 29, 2012, 09:24:55 pm
Game not done yet, but Vitters with two hits including a HR.  His highest full-seasonal OPS in his career has been .770.  I think he's probably up around .790 now at Iowa, for the moment.  Nice to see. 

Seems like Vitters had been pretty much written off as a failure some time ago.  I think we often reach (positive as well as negative) conclusions about young baseball players prematurely now and then.  As a fan, it really is awfully hard to be patient enough to see how these guys are going to turn out.  We aren't very good at deferred gratification when it comes to waiting for prospects to fulfill their potential.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 29, 2012, 09:27:16 pm
A band I like (Modest Mouse) has an album titled "Good News for People Who Like Bad News." Sometimes that's what the entirety of being a Cubs' fan feels like -- especially this year's On The Farm stuff. Today that means Whitenack...yeah it's just one start, but a really bad one. Almost Simpson or Conception bad.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2012, 09:35:00 pm
Vitters: 2-3, HR, RBI, IBB

Beliveau returns: 1 IP, 1 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_29_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 29, 2012, 09:57:44 pm
ArizonaPhil

Gioskar Amaya hit for the cycle and drove-in five runs, as the Cubs edged the Rockies 6-5 in Cactus League Extended Spring Training action this morning at Dust Storm Field at Salt River Fields at Talking Stick east of Scottsdale, AZ.

Amaya reached base on a bad-hop single with one out in the top of the 1st inning, and laced a two-run triple in the 3rd, a three-run home run in the 5th, and a one-out double in the 8th.

The 19-year old Venezuelan is now hitting 291/406/417 in 27 Cactus League Extended Spring Training games (96 PA), with a team-leading 16 walks. He also has eight stolen bases (second only to Javier Baez), with 0 CS. (He hit 377/417/510 in 52 games and 227 PA with the AZL Cubs last season).

Amaya was a DH today, but his defense has shown marked improvement this season, possibly because he has been allowed to concentrate on just one position (2B) instead of being moved around the infield from game-to-game as he was last season. He has made only three errors so far at 2B, and has displayed decent range and arm.

He also has excelled in the #2 slot in the batting order.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 29, 2012, 10:27:05 pm
Any news on Rizzo?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 29, 2012, 10:37:34 pm
Baez 0-5 with 3 K's thus far. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 29, 2012, 10:45:58 pm
However, Baez also has a walk, a stolen base and no errors...we've seen worse around here!

Game in the 13th or 14th inning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2012, 11:01:15 pm
Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_29_wisafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 29, 2012, 11:02:17 pm
Rizzo, like all of us, is day-to-day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 30, 2012, 12:19:14 am
Four of Iowa's five runs tonight were scored off Doug Davis in 1.1 innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 30, 2012, 09:41:38 am
I still wonder if we overestimated the difference between how Theo and Hendry really operate.  And I don’t say that being totally derogatory either, since I’ve thought Hendry generally was a competent baseball executive to begin with.  Theo may have more of an appreciation for new school approaches, but I think he’s shown that there’s plenty of old school, traditional approach with him too, probably more than a lot of us thought going in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 30, 2012, 09:48:03 am
I think we need to keep an eye on roster changes over the next year or so.  The philosophy of Hoyerstein should be manifest in the type of players they acquire and develop in their system.  If we're still a "hack away" system 1-2 years from now, it will be highly concerning.  I doubt that will be the case.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 30, 2012, 10:15:49 am
Seems like Vitters had been pretty much written off as a failure some time ago.  I think we often reach (positive as well as negative) conclusions about young baseball players prematurely now and then.  As a fan, it really is awfully hard to be patient enough to see how these guys are going to turn out.  We aren't very good at deferred gratification when it comes to waiting for prospects to fulfill their potential.

I think part of the problem too is you expect the #3 overall pick to have some superstar potential and you want to see that pretty quickly. We haven’t seen much superstar out of Vitters at all in the four-plus years he’s been in the farm system, and he’s been pretty slow to develop.  If he was 30th or 40th pick in the draft, I don’t think anyone would be all that worked up about his slow and steady progress up the chain.  When you’re the 3rd overall pick, though, and drafted ahead of Matt Weiters, you want to see results come along more quickly than they have for Vitters.

I still have written off Vitters as a future superstar or multiple all-star type player (Hopefully he’ll surprise.).  Being a good solid regular, it’s really starting to look like that’s well within reach for him, and I’m even starting to think there’s even a good chance of that happening.  If the power that scouts have been projecting for him finally materializes to go along with his low strikeout rate, it seems like he’ll turn out to be a good bet for a solid major league career. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 30, 2012, 10:46:03 am
I still wonder if we overestimated the difference between how Theo and Hendry really operate. 

To quote the punchline of one of my favorite jokes, "What, 'We," paleface?"

No doubt some dramatically overestimated the difference.

They thought, and many still think, that Theo walks on water.

The primary difference is that Theo is going about a complete rebuild, and is not really concerned about the team's record this year and next.

That is something Hendry likely was never allowed, and whether ownership would have allowed it or not, his initial success in 2003 likely meant he would not allow it himself.  On some level he likely remained convinced that with just the right move or two, or just the right break here or there, the team could make it to the WS.

The important change is not finding more patient hitters, or pitchers who attack the strike zone, or avoiding long-term FA deals, or sabermetrics or a new culture in the clubhouse.  Nor is it having a GM who is "the smartest guy in the room."

Those might be nice, but they are nothing close to being as important as rebuilding from the bottom up, focusing on developing value instead of winning games, and not worrying about the team's record for a couple of years while enough pieces and prospects are acquired and developed to put the team in contention for a period of several years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 30, 2012, 11:29:32 am
I think part of the problem too is you expect the #3 overall pick to have some superstar potential and you want to see that pretty quickly. We haven’t seen much superstar out of Vitters at all in the four-plus years he’s been in the farm system, and he’s been pretty slow to develop.  If he was 30th or 40th pick in the draft, I don’t think anyone would be all that worked up about his slow and steady progress up the chain.  When you’re the 3rd overall pick, though, and drafted ahead of Matt Weiters, you want to see results come along more quickly than they have for Vitters.

I still have written off Vitters as a future superstar or multiple all-star type player (Hopefully he’ll surprise.).  Being a good solid regular, it’s really starting to look like that’s well within reach for him, and I’m even starting to think there’s even a good chance of that happening.  If the power that scouts have been projecting for him finally materializes to go along with his low strikeout rate, it seems like he’ll turn out to be a good bet for a solid major league career. 

Draft position does not assure stardom.

Since 1978, not one player taken 3rd in the draft has had anything resembling a HOF career.  Matt Williams, Troy Glaus and Evan Longoria, come closest, and Longoria admittedly does still have a chance.  All thirdbaseman, then are the only players with more than 17.1 WAR for their careers who were taken as the 3rd picks since 1978.  Of course in 1977, the 3rd pick was Paul Molitor, in 1974 it was Lonnie Smith and in 1973 it was Robin Yount.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?overall_pick=3&draft_type=junreg&

But Vitters could quite easily end up better than 90% of the #3 picks since 1978.... and still end up a rather mediocre player, such as Jose Cruz or Dick Schoefield, the two #3 picks who rate highest in WAR since 1978 after Williams, Longoria and Glaus.

And there is still considerable reason to hope he will end up better than the other #3 picks the Cubs have had: Corey Patterson; Drew Hall, and Luis Montanez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 30, 2012, 11:53:57 am
I still wonder if we overestimated the difference between how Theo and Hendry really operate.

I don't know if that's true...I think it may be more accurate to say we may have mischaracterized the differences in the way in which they operate.  Here's what Keith Law had to say in a chat right after Theo joined the organization (via MLB Trade Rumors):

Quote
Cubs fans should be excited about Theo Epstein's "ability to turn the Cubs' baseball ops department into a process-oriented, professionally run organization. You can't run a baseball team the way they were run 20 or 30 years ago. It's a business now, one where smart decisions based on sound processes are necessary and innovation is increasingly critical."

I interpret that as saying the biggest changes will probably be pretty transparent if you're just looking at on-the-field issues.  Sure, there will be some differences, but you're not suddenly going to see drastic changes in the on-the-field product overnight.  And you'll never see anything on the field that makes as big an impact as the decision-making processes behind the scenes (which led the Red Sox to target Drew over Soriano before 2007).

Also, I feel that some of the biggest differences might not be that obvious if you're not physically scouting players on a day-to-day basis.  For example, there was some talk about selective aggressiveness yesterday.  I think everyone agrees that's the right approach (even sabermetrically-oriented fans and organizations).  But while I'm sure the Cubs have *taught* a selectively aggressive approach historically, there just isn't much evidence it has sunk in. 

Over the last 15 years or so, the Cubs have had four truly elite position player prospects that were (1) very young when they joined the organization (high school or younger) and (2) un-coached by higher caliber (college, semi-pro or pro) coaches before joining the Cubs--Patterson, Pie, Vitters, and Castro.  The Cubs are 0 for 4 in teaching any of them any kind of real selectivity.  It seems to have been treated as something that is less-than-absolutely-critical to learn because all of them continued to move up the ladder.  But if any of them had ever learned to be as selective as Darwin Barney (who doesn't walk much because he just doesn't have as much talent as most major leaguers, but who also rarely swings at terrible pitches or has a really bad approach), they'd be superstars.

So I'm hoping smart selectivity becomes a critical emphasis, even if we don't notice it just from looking up their walk totals or looking at the box scores from day to day (because really, we wouldn't know that Barney is actually pretty selective just by looking at his stats and box scores).  I think we may already be seeing a similar change with Jackson and Rizzo still being in the minors (though the things they still need to work on are clearly different than Patterson, Castro, etc.). 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on May 30, 2012, 12:06:16 pm
Or, to say it in a shorter way...if you thought bringing in Theo meant a farm system full of Kevin Youkilises, you "overestimated" the change.

If you thought the difference was more subtle but still had a huge impact, I think that will prove to be right.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 30, 2012, 12:42:21 pm
I don't know if that's true...I think it may be more accurate to say we may have mischaracterized the differences in the way in which they operate.  Here's what Keith Law had to say in a chat right after Theo joined the organization (via MLB Trade Rumors):

Does Keith Law post here?

I though the question was about whether WE, as in those of us posting here, overestimated the difference between how Theo and Hendry operate.

Over the last 15 years or so, the Cubs have had four truly elite position player prospects that were (1) very young when they joined the organization (high school or younger) and (2) un-coached by higher caliber (college, semi-pro or pro) coaches before joining the Cubs--Patterson, Pie, Vitters, and Castro.  The Cubs are 0 for 4 in teaching any of them any kind of real selectivity.

I don't know the answer to this, and since I know you worship all things Theo, I am honestly and sincerely hoping you can answer this, but how many comparable players did Theo's system TEACH any kind of real selectivity?  In other words, how many young hackers did the Theo approach convert into grinders?

Were Youkilis and Pedroia and Ortiz hackers when Theo got them, and he converted them?

Are there any real examples of ANY system TEACHING real selectivity?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 30, 2012, 01:17:12 pm
I still wonder if we overestimated the difference between how Theo and Hendry really operate.  And I don’t say that being totally derogatory either, since I’ve thought Hendry generally was a competent baseball executive to begin with.  Theo may have more of an appreciation for new school approaches, but I think he’s shown that there’s plenty of old school, traditional approach with him too, probably more than a lot of us thought going in.

I think that the differences were not only overestimated, but verged on lunacy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 30, 2012, 04:45:18 pm
Quote
First baseman Anthony Rizzo is expected to be back in the lineup Wednesday night as Triple-A Iowa plays Omaha.

Rizzo suffered a right wrist injuring during Sunday night's game in Memphis, and sat out Monday's game.

"Everything's fine," Cubs vice-president of scouting/player development Jason McLeod said Wednesday at Wrigley Field. "He'll be in the lineup (Wednesday night)."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 30, 2012, 06:13:20 pm
Iowa rained out in Omaha.  DH tomorrow night.

According to Dave Sappelt, the I-Cubs have added Shane Lindsay to their bullpen.  Lindsay was released by Dodgers on May 22.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 30, 2012, 08:08:07 pm
Some EST stats from Wednesday:

Candelario: 2-4, RBI

Vogelbach: 2-4, 2B, 3B, 2 K

Hernandez: 0-3, K
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on May 30, 2012, 09:09:07 pm
Lindsay replaces Robertson ... he's been released.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 30, 2012, 09:35:25 pm
Baez: 0-3, 3 K, E, HBP

Wells: 3-1/3 -4-1-0-1-4, 5-1 GO/FO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_30_peoafx_burafx_1


Szczur: 1-3, 2 BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_30_dbcafa_breafa_1

Lake: 2-5, HR, RBI, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_30_hunaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 30, 2012, 10:59:24 pm
Hunter Cervenka 2.1 innings, no hits, no walks, 6 strike outs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 31, 2012, 10:33:00 am
Ben Wells is 33K/8BB/38IP/0HR with 2.5GO/AO. 

He's allowed a lot of hits, and he hasn't been very durable.  I think he may have blister problems or something, he's missed a couple of starts and his longest outing is 5.2 inning.

But the groundball and anti-HR stuff is no fluke.  If you don't serve HR's and you walk less than 2BB/9IP, you're winning two of the three keys.  And 33K/38IP isn't bad, 11K in last 8.1 innings. 

Looks like he might be a serious prospect.  He's still only 19 and will be all season. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 31, 2012, 12:23:06 pm
The question of how much meaningful selectivity can ever be taught is a significant one.  I'd guess the answer is somewhere a little more than "zero", but a lot less than "much", and that it varies from hitter to hitter.  And it's impossible to ever prove or quantify.  In a sense, though, the current Cub situation may be a good test case.  Theo's team comes into a team with Castro, a hacker-extreme.  Will we ever see any noticable improvement in selectivity?  Last year the Cubs drafted a bunch of HS players who they liked enough to pay rather well.  The prize of the bunch is Baez, who was 25K/1BB in his 100 PA in Mesa.  Maybe all those K's were swinging at pitches he could drive and just missing them, but my guess is a 25:1 K/BB ratio probably is a manifestation that there are some recognition and/or selectivity challenges for him.  Castro, Baez, Vitters, Lake, Torreyes, Ha, Szczur, Theo came into a system with a lot of guys who appeared to have some selectivity issues.  If they can significantly improve the selectivity of a lot of these guys, I think that will provide good evidence that selectivity is at least somewhat teachable.

Hopefully their computer/video pitch-monitoring will provide some better assessment than our qualitative assessment, or reliance on walk rates as an indicator.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 31, 2012, 02:05:46 pm
Szczur is showing signs of improved plate selectivity this season. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 31, 2012, 02:07:14 pm
Hard not to like the 32:23 strikeout to walk ratio.  Anytime you're close to 1:1, you have to like that.

If he can develop Kenny Lofton level power, he could be pretty good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 31, 2012, 02:12:04 pm
Have there been reports that Ceasar is not selective at the plate?  He seems to be a high walk, low strikeout guy, which I would equate with reasonable pitch selectivity
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 31, 2012, 02:39:15 pm
Have there been reports that Ceasar is not selective at the plate?  He seems to be a high walk, low strikeout guy, which I would equate with reasonable pitch selectivity

Last year he took 5 walks in 173 AB for Daytona.  This year it's 23 in 185 AB.  Huge change. 
Last he took 26 walks in 447 AB total, many of those early in Peoria. 

So it's been a big change. He's doubled his overall walk rate, and his walk-rate at Daytona has more than fourpled. 

That hasn't come without at least some cost. 
1.  His K-rate is up substantially (17.3% versus 10.7%),
2.  His power is down (10 HR's last year, only 1 this year).  So the concept that he's driving the ball better because he's swinging more selectively at his pitches, which is supposed to result in more power, has not actualized. 
3.  His K/HR rate has more than fourpled (32:1 versus 48:10 = 4.8:1)
4.  His batting average is down (.293 vs .270), as expected when the K's go up and HR-hits go down.     
5.  His OPS is down (.738 vs .758). 

Obviously he's in a higher league (A+ vs A- last spring), and his performance at Daytona is better than it was last season.  I'm still hopeful that he'll keep the gains (more walks, more OBP), but in time the selective-driving will help and he'll recover or exceed the HR power he showed last year.  He hasn't really had a super-hot binge, or power-binge, yet.  So as with Barney and Vitters, getting hot for a while can raise a lot of stats. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 31, 2012, 03:37:19 pm
Fourpled, my dear Fanny?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 31, 2012, 04:56:08 pm
Blake Lalli is at 1B for the I-Cubs in the first game of a DH in Omaha.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 31, 2012, 05:02:07 pm
No reason not to be extra careful in the case of an injury to a top prospect in a minor league game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2012, 08:05:34 pm
Jackson: 1-3, SF, 2 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_31_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2012, 09:15:24 pm
Concepcion: 6-4-2-2-4-4

Baez: 0-4, K  ( .125 overall)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_31_peoafx_burafx_1


Kirk: 5 IP, 5 R

Torreyes: 2-4, GW-ING HR in 9th, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_31_breafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2012, 09:41:13 pm
Jokisch: 6-1/3 -1-1-1-6-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_31_hunaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 31, 2012, 10:38:06 pm
Late Jackson homerun denies a no-hitter.

Jackson: 1-2, HR, RBI, Assist (home)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_31_iowaaa_omaaaa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on June 01, 2012, 08:25:53 am
no news on Soler?  When is the last date he can sign before it starts counting against the international cap?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 01, 2012, 08:27:46 am
Glad we aren't rushing Rizzo back...hope he's treated very conservatively.

Saying that, wonder about the latest word re his return.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 01, 2012, 09:43:37 am
no news on Soler?  When is the last date he can sign before it starts counting against the international cap?

July 1. The next international signing period begins July 2, and the new CBA rules apply.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on June 01, 2012, 10:50:17 am
I almost wonder if this thing is purposely being dragged out to force the Cubs to have to abide by the new CBA rules.  Sort of as punishment for potnetially negotiating before Soler was a free agent. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2012, 11:05:53 am
no news on Soler?  When is the last date he can sign before it starts counting against the international cap?

July 1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2012, 11:08:54 am
The hang up is the DR government.  I doubt that the MLB has that much influence over them.

Now, if he is given residency tomorrow, and it takes MLB nore than a month to grant him free agency, then the conspiracy theories might be correct.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 01, 2012, 11:49:43 am
I'm sure Soler and his agent are going nuts over this. A delay until July means a SERIOUSLY reduced payday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 01, 2012, 11:53:05 am
It's not a big deal.  I'm not impressed with Soler power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 01, 2012, 11:55:57 am
boooooo
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 01, 2012, 11:56:56 am
Admittedly not my best effort.  Close (unfortunately).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 01, 2012, 11:58:42 am
Isn't that a Nissan, P2?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 01, 2012, 12:08:14 pm
Torreyes: 2-4, GW-ING HR in 9th, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_05_31_breafa_dbcafa_1

Perhaps Torreyes is starting to come around.  He is now 8 for his last 24 AB, though that still has his season BA at at pathetic .184.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2012, 12:59:32 pm
It's not a big deal.  I'm not impressed with Soler power.

You can leave us any time you want.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 01, 2012, 01:02:21 pm
You can leave us any time you want.

That Davep sure can be fickle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2012, 01:19:01 pm
Maybe I should run for president.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 01, 2012, 01:46:43 pm
You aren't?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2012, 02:26:58 pm
The latest poll shows that only my wife will vote for me.  And she just wants to get me out of the house.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 01, 2012, 02:43:49 pm
The latest Pol?  Is that a pun?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2012, 03:18:47 pm
I would never encroach on P2's domain.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 01, 2012, 09:30:35 pm
Lake: 2-4, K

McNutt: 6-4-1-1-2-2

Cabrera: 2-1-0-0-2-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_01_hunaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 01, 2012, 09:33:01 pm
6 innings for McNutt?  Is that a career high for him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2012, 09:34:38 pm
Daytona with 15 runs so far.  Gibbs with a home run and Torreyes 4 for 4 with a couple of doubles so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 01, 2012, 09:35:14 pm
The other observation about McNutt is he isn't striking out a lot of batters so far this year.  Only 24 K's in 40 1/3 IP with a 24:18 strikeout to walk ratio. 

At least they're building his innings up, though.  Hopefully he's on his way to pitching 6-7 innings consistently the rest of the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 01, 2012, 09:55:18 pm
Jackson and Vitters each with a home run so far tonight
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 01, 2012, 09:55:54 pm
Jensen: 5-2/3 IP, 0 ER

Baez: 2-5, 2 K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_01_peoafx_burafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 01, 2012, 09:56:57 pm
Jackson and Vitters each with a home run so far tonight

This has been about the best month Vitters has had since that big home run binge he had back when he was in Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 01, 2012, 10:07:03 pm
Szczur: DNP

Torreyes: 4-5, 2 2B, 2 RBI

Simpson: 1-2/3 -3-4-4-4-0

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_01_dbcafa_ftmafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 01, 2012, 10:16:50 pm
That puts Torreyes at 12 for his last 29 and up to .204 for the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 01, 2012, 10:24:46 pm
Jackson: 3-4, HR, RBI, BB

Vitters: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_01_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 01, 2012, 11:29:27 pm
Jax had a decent May, especially the last week.  He may be busting out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 02, 2012, 06:34:08 am
In the last 10 games, Vitters is at ..   .371/.436/.743/1.179, with 4 HR, 3 walks and 2 Ks.
In his last ten games, Jackson is as .378/.405/.730/1.134, with 3 HR, 2 walks and 8 Ks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 02, 2012, 08:22:33 am
I saw the Daytona box score with a zillion runs and hits, so I was hoping Szczur would have a bunch of hits and boost his stats.  But not so.

I think he's been promoted to Tennessee?   .269 average, .734 OPS.  He hasn't stolen a base, gotten an XBH, or had a multi-hit game in the last ten days.  But milb.com now lists him with Tennessee. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 02, 2012, 09:30:25 am
Jax .378 with a 1.134 OPS over his last 10 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 02, 2012, 09:49:26 am
I saw the Daytona box score with a zillion runs and hits, so I was hoping Szczur would have a bunch of hits and boost his stats.  But not so.

I think he's been promoted to Tennessee?   .269 average, .734 OPS.  He hasn't stolen a base, gotten an XBH, or had a multi-hit game in the last ten days.  But milb.com now lists him with Tennessee. 

It's the new "Cub way."

A lot like the old "Cub way."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 02, 2012, 11:48:36 am
http://tinyurl.com/bt52gon (http://tinyurl.com/bt52gon)

Quote
We haven't discussed Cuban outfielder Jorge Soler for a while, because it has seemingly taken forever for him to become a free agent. And all of a sudden, Saturday morning, Jon Heyman of CBSSports.com has learned that Soler has officially become a free agent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 02, 2012, 12:16:08 pm
Kind of bummer timing for Soler.  I'd think a lot of the scouting/procurement people would be rather preoccupied with draft and draft negotiations for the next few weeks. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 02, 2012, 12:27:07 pm
I would bet a steak dinner that he "signs" with the Cubs within a week.  With anyone but Davep.  He's a Dutch welcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 02, 2012, 12:28:30 pm
Kind of bummer timing for Soler.  I'd think a lot of the scouting/procurement people would be rather preoccupied with draft and draft negotiations for the next few weeks. 

I suspect they'll find for Soler.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 02, 2012, 12:33:18 pm
I would bet a steak dinner that he "signs" with the Cubs within a week.  With anyone but Davep.  He's a Dutch welcher.

How can a Dutchman be a Welshman?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 02, 2012, 12:36:43 pm
Dual citizenship.  Your father was Dutch and your mother was a woman.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 02, 2012, 12:45:02 pm
So you are not only a racist, you are also a species-ist.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 02, 2012, 12:53:15 pm
You forgot sexist.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 02, 2012, 07:41:27 pm
Baez with a single and a mammoth home run in his first two at bats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 02, 2012, 08:04:16 pm
If the Cubs don't sign Soler, this season will have a complete wasted feel to it.  If they get him, with this years picks, next years, and what they get for Dempster and Garza they will be incredibly well positioned to not be total crap in 4 years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2012, 08:17:30 pm
Alcantara: 2-5, 2B, 3B, 3 RBI,   41-115 (.356), +.900 OPS since end of April

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_02_dbcafa_ftmafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 02, 2012, 08:54:39 pm
Jackson with a double and triple so far tonight.  Vitters with another home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2012, 09:09:14 pm
Baez' s-h-i-t-t-y attitude apparently reared its ugly head again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 02, 2012, 09:11:23 pm
heh, what happened this time?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2012, 09:14:11 pm
I'll let Kevin Goldstein who is at the game explain.

Keep in mind the score was 13-2 Peoria in the 9th.


Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

Javier Baez swings at a 3-0 pitch and gets one in the ribs with the next pitch. Welcome to pro ball, kid.


Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

Every scout and every pitcher behind home plate agrees. Baez deserved that one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 02, 2012, 09:18:12 pm
Yeah that was pretty bush league.

Still as long as the guy hits, you can work around the shitty attitude.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2012, 09:22:34 pm
Baez: 3-5, HR, 3 RBI, HBP

Rosario: 7-3-0-0-4-10


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_02_peoafx_kccafx_1



Some Kevin Goldstein tweets about Baez and Rosario:



Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

Javier Baez rips a single in the first. Crazy bat speed.


Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

Third. Not an up the middle athlete. RT @Duderino_Abides @Kevin_Goldstein Any chance Baez could play 2nd? Or is he destined for 3rd?


Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

Javier Baez crushes a home run to center. Just crushed. Sold.


Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

Baez home run cleared the Pepsi sign. As long a shot as I've seen in this park since Jason Stokes played here.


Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

Baez with a 6-3 ground out. 4.38 to first.


Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

Pretty damn good. Surprise of night. RT @davidrelliott @Kevin_Goldstein Is Jose Rosario looking as good as his stat line is tonight?

....


Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

92-93, plus SL, avg CH. RT @nbaliva @Kevin_Goldstein 2nd straight start he has looked like this. 7ip, 3h, 1r, 0bb, 7k vs. Wisconsin Monday.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2012, 10:11:38 pm
Baez' homer:

http://www.twitvid.com/TNOEH
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 02, 2012, 10:44:20 pm
That's 8 triples for Jackson.  He's really warm now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 02, 2012, 10:49:01 pm
Another good sign with Jackson is that he isn't striking out nearly as much in his recent hot streak.  8 Ks in his last 40 PA for a 20% strikeout rate.  Small sample, but if he can maintain that for a while and continue hitting, that's a great sign.  Jackson with a 20% strikeout rate has big time potential.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2012, 10:53:34 pm
Jackson: 3-5, 2 2B, 3B, SB, 2 K

Rizzo: 2-4, 2B, BB

Vitters: 2-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_02_iowaaa_orhaaa_1


Lake: 0-5, 3 K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_02_tenaax_monaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 02, 2012, 11:21:27 pm
Quote
Baez later created a few more fireworks when he swung from the heels on a three-ball, no-strike count with the Chiefs leading 15-2 in the top of the ninth. The next pitch from Cougars righty Nick Graffeo drilled him in the ribs, earning an ejection for both the pitcher and manager Buck Buchanan.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 02, 2012, 11:31:55 pm
I have no problem with his swinging in that situation.  If the pitcher's feelings were hurt, tough.

I also have no problem with the pitcher throwing at him after he swung in that situation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 02, 2012, 11:37:03 pm
Nice to see Jackson on a binge.  .265 average, not bad.  Hitting some HR's lately has really helped.  His K/HR ratio is a shade under 10:1 now. 

What a fun day for the farm news, with Jackson, Vitters, Rizzo, and Baez having big days, plus the news that Soler is now open for business, plus Rosario raising his interest.  Over his last 8 starts, he's 54K/44IP/14walks.  I assume the slider has improved, and he's getting K's with it now on days when it's working.  Kind of nice to have some pitchers in Peoria worth tracking. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2012, 12:26:05 am
Quote
I have no problem with his swinging in that situation.  If the pitcher's feelings were hurt, tough.

"Swinging from the heels" on 3-0, up 11 in the 9th seems incredibly unprofessional. I'd argue it's selfish as well. And it was the manager who wanted Baez hit. He went to the mound and conferred with the pitcher after Baez swung.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 03, 2012, 01:58:59 am
You only quoted the first half of my post.  The second half said that I had no problem with the retaliation.  It is a big boy's game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 03, 2012, 07:12:12 am
Gibson, Marichal, Drysdale--Baez is lucky he didn't play back then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 03, 2012, 07:58:48 am
Lake 13K/0BB over last ten games.  He may well be being taught to swing at hit pitch and drive it, but probably for the moment he's not recognizing what really are his pitches, or if so he's not able to drive it very well. 

Rizzo, Vitters, Jackson combine for 15+9+7 HR.  I wonder if/when the Cubs have ever had three young prospects combine for over 30 HR's this early in the season.  At 22, 22, and 23, they are probably three of the younger non-Latin position players in AAA.  A very unusual power output. 

Peoria's pitching is now looking consistently interesting.  Wells, Rosario, Burke, Jensen, Concepcion.  The front four have been looking really good, probably with Wells and Rosario as the most promising two.  And while Concepcion has been astonishingly bad, the money/name/scouting still make him rather interesting.  I don't know what's going to happen with him, but I still assume the Cub scouts must be too smart to have what he's been really be what he'll always be.  Maybe he's hurt, maybe his mechanics are way messed up, maybe they're working with revising some mechanics/grip and he's still in the process.  Either way, it's not like on a day when Concepcion is pitching, that we aren't even interested in looking at the box score the way it is if Searle or Figuroa or Raley is pitching.  Either a hope that he's figuring something out or else just a morbid curiousity makes you interested to see what his line will look like.  But if he can get things straightened out, and with Jensen-Wells-Rosario-Burke, that's a really interesting, and perhaps really good, rotation.  Not much pitching to get excited about in the system, but Peoria's rotation is. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 03, 2012, 08:07:45 am
Yeah that was pretty bush league.

Still as long as the guy hits, you can work around the ****ty attitude.

So it is bush league to swing at a 3-0 pitch when your team is up by a large margin in the 9th?

If so, give me a few more bush league players.

As a fan, I like to see the ball knocked around the field.  I don't like to see hitters simply standing with the bats on their shoulders.  Even if the score is 13-2 in the 9th.

If it appeared intentional, I hope the pitcher and manager both face suspension for a while.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 03, 2012, 08:09:39 am
Whitenack scheduled today.  That should be interesting to see if he can pitch well.  May be that his stuff just isn't ready for A+, and his excellence in Mesa is just a function of facing bad hitters.  May also be that he's getting tired.  Or that he just had an off day, and he'll be good today. 

Szczur has missed two days straight.  I'd thought he was perhaps promoted, but I think I was wrong. 

milb.com listed him as Tennessee in their search.  But having missed both Friday and Saturday, I think he's just injured for Daytona.  Using the same search function, Whitenack lists Tennessee too.  So the milb search must not be reliable for the team listing. 

Too bad if Szczur is hurt again.  As a gung-ho guy whose game rests so much on speed and hustle, he may be injury-oriented.  Hopefully nothing serious and maybe if he can get close to 100%, he'll be productive.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 03, 2012, 08:12:56 am
Jackson: 3-5, 2 2B, 3B, SB, 2 K

Rizzo: 2-4, 2B, BB

Vitters: 2-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, K

If they all continue this in Iowa, get late season callups, and look good then.....

Eh, wouldn't mean anything.... September callups never mean anything....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2012, 08:15:59 am
Szczur must be dealing with a nagging injury. On the positive side, he was just named a FSL all-star along with Kirk, Alcantara, Rohan and Nelson Perez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 03, 2012, 08:16:36 am
Gibson, Marichal, Drysdale--Baez is lucky he didn't play back then.

For some reason I doubt any of them often were pitching in the 9th when they were behind 13-2.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 03, 2012, 11:32:08 am
Not likely.  But any one of them could be the starting pitcher the next day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 03, 2012, 11:49:35 am
Jackson is also hitting .362 with an 1.158 OPS against lefties.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2012, 04:09:55 pm
Baez didn't start today apparently as punishment. He reportedly ignored a take sign when he swung 3-0 in the 9th last night.

He did get into the game late and hit a 2-run homer that went over a sign in center and was estimated at 430 ft.


Baez: 1-2, HR, 2 RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_03_peoafx_kccafx_1


Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_03_dbcafa_ftmafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2012, 04:19:07 pm
Back to Baez, Chiefs broadcaster Nathan Baliva tweeted that Baez' homer today was more like 450+ over a batters eye in center.

Kane County broadcaster Wayne Randazzo sent out these tweets:


Quote
Wayne Randazzo ‏@WayneRandazzo

@Kevin_Goldstein Baez just hit another one. Over the batter's eye in dead center. Deeper than last night's shot. Crazy power.


Quote
Wayne Randazzo ‏@WayneRandazzo

Javier Baez with a 2-run bomb and 2 great defensive plays in 2 innings today. I think i'm on the Baez train. Pretty impressive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2012, 07:34:04 pm
A Cub fan at the Peoria game today took this photo of Baez' homerun swing.

https://twitter.com/BornOnThirdCubs/status/209432719724257280/photo/1/large
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2012, 08:11:43 pm
The Dominican League season started yesterday.

17-year-old, big bonus SS Luis Acosta had a big debut in the 3-hole.

.

Acosta: 3-5, 3 2B, 4 RBI, K

Malave: 1-4, RBI, 2 K; played 3B


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_02_dptrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 03, 2012, 09:05:08 pm
Jackson: 1-4, SB, 2 K

Rizzo: 1-3, BB

Beliveau: 1-1-1-1-0-3, HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_03_iowaaa_orhaaa_1


Struck: 5-2/3 -2-3-3-2-7, 2 HR

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_03_tenaax_monaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 04, 2012, 12:27:37 am
A Cub fan at the Peoria game today took this photo of Baez' homerun swing.

https://twitter.com/BornOnThirdCubs/status/209432719724257280/photo/1/large

Either his uniform top is too big for him, or his baby is due any day now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 04, 2012, 01:33:08 pm
The Cubs have signed Hong-Chih Kuo, an All-Star in 2010, to a minor-league deal.  He will report to Mesa.  He was released by the Mariners on March 19.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/k/kuoho01.shtml
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2012, 07:31:31 pm
Ben Wells walked off the mound with the trainer and left tonight's game after warming up in the 3rd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 04, 2012, 07:33:23 pm
That sounds about right.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 04, 2012, 07:34:11 pm
When you combine a curse with gross incompetence, there's no hope.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 04, 2012, 07:34:29 pm
Not good. Wells is my favorite of the Cubs' pitching prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2012, 08:00:54 pm
Well screams Billy Petrick to me for some reason.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2012, 08:55:31 pm
Baez: 1-3, 2B, BB, SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_04_peoafx_kccafx_1


Alcantara: 2-5, 2B, 2 RBI, K

Szczur: DNP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_04_dbcafa_ftmafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 04, 2012, 08:57:07 pm
Wells was looking like a much better prospect than Petrick ever had the chance to be.  Wells had outstanding control/anti-HR stuff, and was looking pretty good with the K-stuff too. 

Real shame.  He seemed to be the best pitcher in the system as of yesterday. 

Has anybody heard anything about what's up with Whitenack?  After his miracle comeback at Mesa, he got bombed in his debut at Daytona last Tuesday, and hasn't pitched since.  HOpefully he just threw on the side to stay on schedule when they had a rain day or something.  Or maybe the other guys have first dibs in the rotation so he's going to get skipped or something.  But I'm wondering if he's hurt again? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2012, 08:59:00 pm
Acosta: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_04_dchrok_dptrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2012, 09:03:21 pm
Petrick was also a big, hard-throwing, anti-hr, sinker-baller who had success in the MWL at a young age. They were even picked in relatively similar rounds. Petrick showed real good stuff out of the pen in his limited time with the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 04, 2012, 09:06:41 pm
I always liked Billy Petrick.  Kerry Wood lite.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 04, 2012, 09:20:20 pm
He was great on The Munsters, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2012, 10:02:54 pm
Rizzo: 3-5, 2B, RBI, SB

Jackson: 0-3, 2 BB, 3 K, SB

Vitters: 0-5, 2 K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_04_iowaaa_orhaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 04, 2012, 10:06:06 pm
Glad we went with Travis Wood in the rotation instead of Chris Rusin.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 04, 2012, 10:34:03 pm
Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_04_tenaax_monaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 05, 2012, 08:35:44 am
Baez with two walks at Peoria, and two HBP, and the AB where he probably was supposed to sit there and take a walk but got into trouble by swinging instead.  That's not bad for IsoD early on.  We'll see how that goes. 

Ha had 23 walks in 520 AB last year.  22 walks in 213 AB this year.  Quite a change.  OPS is about the same, he's lost in slugging what he's gained in OBP.  As with Szczur, the rise in walks/IsoD has corresponded to a worsening in everything else (HR, slugging, K's, K/HR.)  Ha is still only 21, so I still have the hope that he'll grow into more power.  If he had 6 more HR's, all else equal, he'd be hitting .300 with an .861 OPS and he'd be one of our best prospects.  Hopefully with time he'll get better at everything and perhaps significantly stronger, and we will end up with a pretty good player. 

The theory is that more patience and more selectivity should be all win-win-win and result in more power.  In practice that doesn't often seem to be the case, although perhaps Vitters could be a case where it's working.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 05, 2012, 09:51:24 am
If he had 6 more HR's, all else equal, he'd be hitting .300 with an .861 OPS and he'd be one of our best prospects.

Ah, yes, again we see the beauty of hypothetical homers.

Wouldn't ALL hitting prospects be better if they just had another 6 more HR in their first 213 AB, or about 15 more HR a year?

Imagine how good LaHair would have been last season in the minors if we had just added another 6 HR for every 213 AB, "all else equal."  Or what it would do for him now, in the majors.  He would now have 18 HR, hitting .363, leading the league in HR and just a couple of points off the leader in BA.

Hopefully that illustrates the foolishness of those wonderful hypothetical HR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 05, 2012, 09:57:13 am
The theory is that more patience and more selectivity should be all win-win-win and result in more power.  In practice that doesn't often seem to be the case, although perhaps Vitters could be a case where it's working.

It could be.

And hopefully it will be, but the numbers so far don't offer much to conclude that in fact it is.  Neither his IsoD nore his slugging percentage numbers are outside of his prior fluctuations from one season to the next, and considering his relatively small sample size, statistical noise would be more likely the explanation for a variation so little outside of his prior norm.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 05, 2012, 10:14:31 am
jes, indeed every hitter would be better with more HR's.  I'm not suggesting that Ha should have or will have more HR's, or should be evaluated as if he did (which I think was more along Scotti's line with Burke....).  But HR's are huge.  Ha is a nothing prospect without them.  IF (as is true with many prospects) somehow he started to product a decent number of HR's, he'd suddenly go from a nothing prospect to a significant prospect. 

"Hypothetical" stuff is central to prospect projection.  There are some very valuable prospects in the low minors and guys that are being drafted this week.  Are many of them big-time major-league ready right now?  No.  But there are hypotheticals with each:  if he gains velocity, if he hypothetically improves his control, if he gets stronger, if he can throw strikes.  If you don't like hypothetical projections, prospects and drafting may not be your place. 

HR's come in bunches.  A month ago, Vitters was having a terrible season.  Then he happened to go on a HR binge, and his numbers look good and he's perceived as a serious prospect. A handful of HR's can really change the profile and change the perceptions. 

Last year Ha hit 11 at age 20, this year he's hit only 2.  Scouting reports have never projected him as a power hitter.  But it seems possible that there is some physical ability and strength to hit some decent number of HR's.   

HR's are also one of the few stats at which players often improve significantly.  If you're not fast enough to steal at 21, you probably won't be at 26 or 30 either.  But there are a lot of guys who hit 11 HR's in the minors at age 20 who end up hitting quite a few in the majors.  Ha isn't likely to become one of them.  But if somehow he does, we'll probably have a good player.  Very unlikely, but not impossible. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 05, 2012, 11:37:47 am
Curt, 6 HR in 123 AB is a very good rate -- it is at the rate of 30 a year for a guy with 600 AB.  So setting aside the joking, that is one heck of a lot of hypothetical HR to add in projecting the improvement in a hitter which added power might bring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 05, 2012, 09:12:40 pm
Quote
Sahadev Sharma ‏@sahadevsharma

Koptizke on Baez swinging @ 3-0 pitch when up 13-0: We try to play the game the right way & w/ respect. In that situation we made a mistake.


Quote
More Kopitzke about Baez swinging at 3-0 pitch: 'We try to learn from it & move on.'


Quote
Sahadev Sharma ‏@sahadevsharma

Kopitzke said Baez not starting on Sunday wasn't a punitive measure. Says he'd played 6 straight days & needed a break.


Quote
Norm Bothwell ‏@nbothwell11

@Cubsminorswrap @sahadevsharma zomg, SIX straight days?!?!

....

Sahadev Sharma ‏@sahadevsharma

@nbothwell11 @cubsminorswrap haha, I'm just passing along what he said. I've talked to plenty of people that aren't buying it


Quote
'He's an exciting player, you see what he can do w/ the bat. He doesn't get enough credit for what he does w/ the glove.' Kopitzke on Baez


Quote
Kopitzke also gave Baez credit for his speed: He's got a chance to change the game in a buch of different ways every time he's on the field.


Quote
Sahadev Sharma ‏@sahadevsharma

Most interesting thing Baez said was on swinging at 3-0 pitch: 'That was my fault. I didn't mean to show anybody up.'


Quote
Sahadev Sharma ‏@sahadevsharma

Baez on swing at 3-0 pitch: 'I swung at it cause I wasn't thinking. I see a fastball right down the middle and I swing at it.'


Quote
Sahadev Sharma ‏@sahadevsharma

Baez on getting hit w/ next pitch, 'I didn't get mad because I knew it was my fault. I knew I was going to get hit, I just got over it.'


Quote
Sahadev Sharma ‏@sahadevsharma

Final Baez quote, on getting hit by pitch, 'I'm still learning the game, so I'm just going to keep learning the game.'
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 05, 2012, 09:16:04 pm
Quote
Baez on swing at 3-0 pitch: 'I swung at it cause I wasn't thinking. I see a fastball right down the middle and I swing at it.'

He might be honest about that.  After all, he's just 18 years old, and he's trying to impress people at the plate.  At the very least, he's contrite and he acknowledged that he deserved what happened to him afterwards.  Hopefully he's learned his lesson, and everyone can move on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 05, 2012, 09:38:21 pm
Jackson: 1-4, 2 K

Vitters: 0-4, K, PO

Dolis: BS, 2-out, 3-run HR allowed


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_05_iowaaa_orhaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 05, 2012, 09:43:43 pm
Sappelt down to .219.  I'm surprised how bad he's been.  That guy's hit every rung up the minor league ladder and was a terrific Triple-A hitter last year.  I wonder why he's been so bad for three months, including spring training.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 05, 2012, 09:50:37 pm
Because he is now a Cub?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 05, 2012, 10:31:48 pm
Kirk: 6-4-1-1-3-7

Szczur: DNP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_05_braafa_dbcafa_1


Jokisch: 7-5-0-0-1-1

Ha: 2-3, 3B, 3 RBI, 2 BB, K

Hak-Ju Lee's first two homers of the year in this series.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_05_tenaax_monaax_1


Chiefs idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 05, 2012, 10:34:01 pm
Acosta: 1-5, HR, 2 RBI, 4 K   (6-7 w/ 4 2B's, HR, when he puts the ball in play)

Malave: 2-4, 2 2B, 4 RBI, BB

Pieters: 2-1-0-0-2-1  (debut)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_05_dphrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2012, 12:37:53 am
Guy who attended Peoria's game Monday:

Quote
Eli Sentman ‏@elisentman

I didn't tweet about seeing Javier Baez at Kane County last night. Main impression: three slick plays at shortstop. Could be GREAT at third.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 06, 2012, 01:25:46 am
If so, couldn't he be great at short?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2012, 01:41:22 am
Quote
If so, couldn't he be great at short?

I keep reading from those who have watched him that he doesn't necessarily have the athleticism or lateral movement to be real good at short; that he has hands, reflexes and arm strength which would make him better at 3rd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 06, 2012, 01:51:21 am
I hope Phil is right about Baez, because it would be nice to have him at SS when the brass finally admits Castro can't play there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 06, 2012, 07:50:54 am
Purple, please.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 06, 2012, 08:37:12 am
I hope Phil is right about Baez, because it would be nice to have him at SS when the brass finally admits Castro can't play there.
I'm beginning to agree with you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 06, 2012, 09:40:40 am
Ha got got replaced by a pinch-runner last night.  Hopefully nothing serious.  His OBP is now up to .359, with an IsoD of .081.  If he could both sustain that and boost his average some, he might become a good OBP guy. 

Jokisch's overall ERA is down to 2.97 for the season.  He's probably been getting pretty BABIP lucky at Tenn.  0.115 average against, despite only 7K in 18 innings.  His K rates have been fine in A, though, pretty good control.  Has been a HR-guy, though. 
 
An NSBB poster saw one of his good games recently, while sitting behind the gun teammates.  Said he was mostly 88-90, but saw a 92.  So while he's a standard finesse lefty, that's a little faster than I expected.  He's 22, so not a fossil. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 06, 2012, 02:52:47 pm
LHP Graham Hicks has been released from Daytona.  He was part of the Tom Gorzellany deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on June 06, 2012, 07:16:13 pm
Looks like this Soler thing will finally come to a close soon - http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chi-cubs-watch-soler-workout-draft-sveums-son-20120606,0,1893394.story

It would be really disappointing if we don't end up signing him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2012, 07:31:21 pm
Acosta: 2-5, 3B, 5 RBI, BB, 2 K

Malave: 2-5, RBI, BB, K, E

Arcila: 2-3, 3B, 4 RBI, 3 BB, K

Garcia: 3-1-1-0-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_06_dchrok_dphrok_1


Daniel Sanchez: 0-3, BB, E

Jose Paulino: 4-2-1-0-0-10, 4 WP, 2 HB,   Barely 17 year old LHP



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_06_dtwrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2012, 09:12:49 pm
Baez: 3-4, 3B, RBI

Concepcion: 5-2/3 IP, 0 R


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_06_cedafx_peoafx_1


Szczur's Amelia Earhart impersonation continues:


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_06_braafa_dbcafa_1


Iowa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2012, 09:15:18 pm
From the Peoria Chiefs' Twitter tonight:


Quote
Jim Mattson ‏@hoijim

Just saw Peoria Chiefs ss and Cubs top prospect Javier Baez take bp-- wow--he swings and hits it hard--Fun to watch--Chiefs home thru Monday



Quote
Peoria Chiefs ‏@peoriachiefs

Peralta walks the first batter and Javy Baez saves at least one run with a great play a SS ranging to his right and firing a strike to 1st.



Quote
Peoria Chiefs ‏@peoriachiefs

Watch him run! Baez plugs the gap in RC all the way to the wall and cruises to 3rd with a stand up triple, his 1st, and a 3-hit game
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 06, 2012, 09:17:39 pm
Tennessee throwing a shutout through five innings.

What makes that interesting is that Daytona and Peoria pitchers also threw shutouts tonight.

See how concentrating on pitching in the draft can improve your results?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2012, 09:49:03 pm
Complete video highlights of Baez' night at the link:


http://www.cinewsnow.com/sports/Peoria-Chiefs-win-4-0-Baez-goes-3-4-157664565.html

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 06, 2012, 09:50:35 pm
Loosen has been pretty good.  An nsbb guy said he's been told that he's been working pretty consistently up around 92 or so.  So may be OK in terms of velocity. 

Nice to see Concepcion put together a couple of capable outings.  McNutt has sequenced some decent games, too.  Both have in common tons of walks and hardly any K's. 

McNutt has been a totally low-K's guy.  That doesn't sound particularly relief-oriented.  He just doesn't have any knockout pitch.  Who'd have guessed that his ERA was in the lowish 2's, when he hasn't had a single very impressive game. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 06, 2012, 10:03:17 pm
Pretty fun to have all the Baez buzz.  The Cubs have had some prospects, but it's a long time since we've had a "wow" guy. 

Probably the first wow guy since Prior.  Fun.

He's got a pretty substantial leg kick.  Almora's is small by comparison. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 06, 2012, 10:12:39 pm
Probably the first wow guy since Prior.  Fun.

Small cautionary note, but Corey Patterson was this impressive when he was in the Midwest League. 

I still think Baez has a lot more natural hitting ability than Patterson, though. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 06, 2012, 10:18:07 pm
Brian Dopirak was ridiculously good early on, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2012, 10:21:44 pm
Albert Pujols also tore up the MWL league.


Wait a minute......
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2012, 10:34:34 pm
Dustin Geiger is now in Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 06, 2012, 10:50:49 pm
McNutt: 5-2/3 -3-0-0-4-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_06_tenaax_monaax_1


Your SL All Stars:

Jim Adduci, Frank Batista, Justin Bour, Kevin Rhoderick.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 06, 2012, 11:04:32 pm
I didn't realize the Southern League was like pee wee where everybody gets to be an All-Star.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 06, 2012, 11:38:37 pm
Peoria is in Beloit next Tuesday, Wednesday and thursday.  I plan to go to all three games, so that makes it certain that Baez will not be on the team at that point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 07, 2012, 12:09:12 am
Quote
One of the areas that Baez worked on in extended spring training was hitting the ball to the right side. He singled to right in the fourth and hit a stand-up triple to the gap in right-center in the eighth.

“I was looking for a fastball every time and (tried) to hit to the right side,” Baez said. “I was working on that before the game and I wanted to do that in the game, too.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 07, 2012, 04:37:34 am
Amelia's been found!


Quote
Matt Szczur has been put on the disabled list because of a strained knee. Harper said the Cubs are just being cautious with the outfield prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 07, 2012, 07:47:31 am
Small cautionary note, but Corey Patterson was this impressive when he was in the Midwest League. 

I still think Baez has a lot more natural hitting ability than Patterson, though. 

Patterson in a full season (509 AB) at Lansing at age 19 -- .320/.358/.592/.949   25BB/85K

Baez in 39 AB at Peoria at age 19 -- .343/.410/.600/1.010.     2BB/10K

Baez is only 4 months younger than Patterson when Patterson was in the Midwest league.

Baes' OPS of 1.010 would have him 3rd in the league if he maintained it and had enough AB to qualify; Patterson's OPS of .949 for a full season had him ranked 5th.

What jumps out at me is that Patterson have a better BB/K ratio, as well as a better K/AB ratio.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 07, 2012, 07:54:43 am
Oh, and the OPS leader for the Midwest league when Patterson was there?

My guy Hee Seup Choi, who is still racking up those HOF numbers.... at least for the Kia Tigers in Korea.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 07, 2012, 10:56:49 am
A video report on Baez that includes Baez being interviewed:


http://centralillinoisproud.com/fulltext?nxd_id=251222
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 07, 2012, 09:39:30 pm
Baez: 0-2, SB, K, HBP

Jensen: 5-1-0-0-3-7

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_07_cedafx_peoafx_1


I wonder if Rhee is hurt again.  ( 2 K's last 23 IP )


Lake: 3-3, 2 RBI, BB, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_07_msbaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 07, 2012, 09:43:07 pm
Just looking at that Peoria lineup, it's still amazing to me how guys can go from looking like world beaters in Boise to accomplishing nothing in Peoria. I'm particularly thinking about Zeke DeVoss and Pin-Chieh Chen.  Hopefully those guys can get things going sooner or later.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 07, 2012, 09:43:26 pm
Rizzo: 1-3, RBI, IBB

Vitters: 2-3, 2B, RBI, BB, K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_07_nasaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 07, 2012, 09:57:23 pm
Just looking at that Peoria lineup, it's still amazing to me how guys can go from looking like world beaters in Boise to accomplishing nothing in Peoria. I'm particularly thinking about Zeke DeVoss and Pin-Chieh Chen.  Hopefully those guys can get things going sooner or later.

Certainly their performance has fallen off with the promotion, but they weren't quite "world beaters" in Boise.... even if they are accomplishing nothing in Peoria.

DeVoss -- .311/.458/.386/.845 at Boise to .244/.373/.338/.711 in Peoria

Chen -- .301/.363/.424/.787 at Boise to .219/   .312/.316/.627 in Peoria

DeVoss still has an excellent OBP, which is what you want in a speeding leadoff hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 07, 2012, 10:13:16 pm
Rizzo: 1-3, RBI, IBB

Vitters: 2-3, 2B, RBI, BB, K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_07_nasaaa_iowaaa_1

Man, poor ol' Brett Jackson is a forgotten man, not even included in Chris' minor league summaries anymore.  1 for 3, 2B, RBI, R
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 07, 2012, 10:32:30 pm
Hunter Cervenko suddenly has control over the past several games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 07, 2012, 11:24:30 pm
Quote
not even included in Chris' minor league summaries anymore. 


At the time I posted the box it had Jackson as 0-3.


I did forget to mention that Daytona was postponed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 07, 2012, 11:30:05 pm
Dave, that's been kind of weird. A nsbb guy saw him a couple outings back.  Said he was kind of a thick guy, and said he was slow, struggled to get it up near 90. 

The draft kind of reminds me of how cautious I should be with velocity readings.  I think every pitcher in the draft supposedly throws in the low-mid 90's.  And half of the outfielders/infielders/catchers do too, to read the draft reports.  It's nothing to find a $5K unvalued senior who supposedly was throwing 96 consistently at Wrigley.  Or to have some position player who was asked to pitch a little and was throwing 93.  Or to get some kid who isn't prohibitively expensive and lasts till the 40th round who throws 90-92.  Or have the little lefty from Texas who supposedl hit 97, but his coach (I think) said he works in the upper 80's and has touched 90-91 this spring. 

Seems like having reported mid-90's velocity is totally routine.  Being able to do it with consistency, and on pitches that are used to get people out where location is useful, that's a different story. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 08, 2012, 12:24:37 am
You don't always know why a player struggles (or sometimes, why he doesn't).  I read recently that Concepcion is having difficulty at Peoria because he is throwing mostly fastballs.  It was said that if he threw only curves and sliders, he would dominate the league.

I don't remember where I read it, and have no idea if it is true.  But let's assume for a moment that it IS true.  It must be at the direction of his manager (or pitching coach).  And if so, there must be a reason for it (assuming that the coach knows what he is doing). 

Shut up, Jeff.

It could be that they have made mechanical adjustments to his delivery, and want him to learn to command the pitch.

It could be that they want to give him confidence in his fastball, after having relied on his breaking pitches against lower level hitters.

It could be for any number of reasons, good or bad, which result in his struggling more than his talent would seem to warrant. 

And we wouldn't know, just by looking at the stats.

Or, he just might stink.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 08, 2012, 12:26:26 am
Jackson now has 28 XBHs in 214 ABs...that's VERY good....OBP now up to .343.    He's played real well the last 2-3 weeks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on June 08, 2012, 08:22:36 am
What's going on with Vogelbach?  I looked up his name on MiLB and it just has last years stats.  Is he in extended ST?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 08, 2012, 09:02:59 am
What's going on with Vogelbach?  I looked up his name on MiLB and it just has last years stats.  Is he in extended ST?

That's my understanding.  And not only that he is still in extended spring training, but that he is stinking up the place.  Big disappointment for me.  He was my favorite pick last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 08, 2012, 09:39:25 am
What's going on with Vogelbach?  I looked up his name on MiLB and it just has last years stats.  Is he in extended ST?
We'll know a lot more about his status when the Boise Hawks roster is finalized and that should be soon.  Their season starts a week from today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 08, 2012, 10:46:35 am

ChicagoCubsOnline @PeoChiefsGame (https://twitter.com/#!/PeoChiefsGame) Baez reaches on a dropped 3rd strike in the 7th and steals 2nd, 3rd steal of the season. 0-2 tonight, hbp, sb.

Pretty cool.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 08, 2012, 11:36:26 am
I will be surprised if Vogelbach starts teh season at Boise.  He has really hit poorly in EST.  Of course, they may be reworking his swing for some reason, but that would be a strange thing to do with a kid who was drafted because he was such a good hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 08, 2012, 12:03:44 pm
Has Arizona Phil posted anything about Vogelbach in the last couple of months?

Anything even suggesting an explanation for his problems?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 08, 2012, 12:13:45 pm
I think Vogelbach's OBP is probably great.  He seems to have a ton of walks.  But he hasn't hit hardly any if any HR's, and he K's a fair bit, so his average is naturally bad.  I hope it's just temporary and he emerges as a true-blue hitter who hits HR's besides. 

But big-time power doesn't do much good if the fast-moving balls never seem to show up where the bat is swinging.  If you're a very good hitter, being really strong helps a bunch.  But if you can't hit the ball on the nose, who cares how strong you are or how far you could hit balls in BP or off of Dale Sveum?  Hoilman at Peoria is another one of the strongmen who has hardly any HR's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2012, 01:16:37 pm
Javier Baez comes in 8th on BA's Hot Sheet this week:

Quote
Team: low Class A Peoria (Midwest)
Age: 19

Why He's Here: .476/.542/.905 (10-for-21), 4 R, 1 2B, 1 3B, 2 HR, 6 RBIs, 1 BB, 5 SO, 2-for-2 SB

The Scoop: The Cubs waited until the end of May to unleash their 2011 first-round pick on the Midwest League, and opposing pitchers are wishing the team had kept Baez in extended spring training a little longer. It's only been 10 games, but Baez is hitting .324/.405/.568 with two home runs. He's looking every bit like the potential plus hitter with plus power the Cubs envisioned when they drafted him, with plenty of bat speed and power. Sure he may not end up playing shortstop in the big leagues, but with a bat like this, who cares?


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613546.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 08, 2012, 01:26:35 pm
I wonder if the EST stats AZPhil shares ought to be taken with a grain of salt, even if they are accurate.  I mean we were all worried about Baez not drawing any walks, striking out 1 out of 3 times during like a 40 AB stretch, etc.  You'd think the way he was hitting in EST that there would be no way he could handle the Midwest League, but instead, he's tearing the Midwest League apart.

It will probably be more telling what's going on with a guy like Vogelbach when real games start.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 08, 2012, 01:51:57 pm
Baseball cube has different stats for Baez.  They have him with an obp of .359.  11Ks in 37abs.  Baseball reference has a .405 obp.  I think baseball cube ignores the 3 Hbp.  Something to consider when talking about stats ... sometimes need to check different sites.  Also, those 3 Hbp play a huge role in making it look like Baez is dominating.

Until Baez is doing well in Tenn, I won't get too excited.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2012, 02:06:48 pm
JR, Baez had a great 5-game stretch, but struggled mightily prior to that, at one point fanning 9 times in 18 at-bats.  All told, he still has just 2 walks against 11 K's in 37 at-bats.

It's pretty close to the pattern he established in Mesa: destroy the ball for stretches, get baffled for others, rarely walk either way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 08, 2012, 02:52:31 pm
RHP Ty'Relle Harris promoted from Tennessee to Iowa to take the place of RHP Frankie De La Cruz who is on the DL with a left quad strain.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 08, 2012, 02:52:46 pm
Regarding the HBP for Baez, some guys have a knack for this.  Of course, too early to tell about Baez but, for example, Chase Utley averages 20 HBP per season.  As a result, Utley is a career .375 OBP guy instead of a .355 OBP guy---a very significant difference.  HBP count.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 08, 2012, 03:01:23 pm
We need to bring back Chad Meyers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on June 08, 2012, 04:42:28 pm
Chad called on me as drug rep for a little bit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 08, 2012, 04:47:49 pm
Regarding the HBP for Baez, some guys have a knack for this.

Ron Hunt.

12 years in the majors.  243 HBP.  6 straight years with 24 or more, including one year with FIFTY.  Helped to give him a career OBP of .368, with a BA or .273, and no more than 78 walks in any season, with only one season at more than 58 walks. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2012, 06:53:17 pm
Kevin Goldstein has a podcast up in which he talks about, among other things, his observations of Javier Baez this week. Major accolades for Baez' ability plus discussion of the "incident".

http://pcd.dreamhosters.com/podcast/episode95.mp3


The whole podcast is over two hours but there is no time indicator. The Baez stuff starts about 1/4 of the way through.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2012, 08:41:31 pm
Daytona GM 1:


Whitenack: 2-3-1-1-0-1   (left after a rain delay)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_08_braafa_dbcafa_1


Iowa GM 1:


Rizzo: 2-4, HR, RBI, K

Vitters: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI

Jackson: 1-4, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_08_nasaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on June 08, 2012, 09:20:50 pm
Good to see Rizzo hit a HR.  I think that's his first HR since he got back into the lineup. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 08, 2012, 09:27:15 pm
I ask this in all seriousness - what does Rizzo have to do at AAA in order to get a callup?  He's dominated there for better than a full season.  Are they looking to go the full route and delay his free agency a year?  Do they not want him exposed to the misery of the big club?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 08, 2012, 09:29:52 pm
According to Cubs Den, he was in the minors to shorten his swing.    If he stays in the minors 2 more weeks, it will add a year under the Cubs control.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 08, 2012, 09:31:38 pm
I thought this week was the cutoff to delay arb.  No?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2012, 09:32:38 pm
Baez: 0-4, K

Rosario: 6-5-2-2-1-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_08_cedafx_peoafx_1


Struck: 6-7-3-3-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_08_msbaax_tenaax_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on June 08, 2012, 09:37:26 pm
Rizzo has to stay in the minors until June 23.  That will delay his free agency.  I can't imagine they'll keep him in the minors much longer than that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 08, 2012, 09:57:57 pm
Rizzo has to stay in the minors until June 23.  That will delay his free agency.  I can't imagine they'll keep him in the minors much longer than that. 

They could keep him in Iowa until August to keep him from being a super-two for arbitration.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 08, 2012, 10:19:16 pm
It's been said that the Cubs are wary of bringing Rizzo up in a situation in which he's viewed as some kind of savior.  They don't want that sort of pressure on him. If that's the case, ironically, he's more likely to be brought up when the Cubs are not struggling so much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 08, 2012, 10:20:53 pm
2015?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 08, 2012, 10:22:29 pm
There is no sane person on this planet that thinks Anthony Rizzo can fix the Chicago Cubs.

Not one.

Babe Ruth couldn't save the Cubs 2012 season, if he hit AND pitched.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2012, 10:57:45 pm
Daytona GM 2:


Alcantara: 3-4, RBI, SB, K

Francescon: 5-3-3-1-1-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_08_braafa_dbcafa_2


Iowa GM 2:

Jackson: 2-3, 2B, PO

Rizzo: 0-3, K

Vitters: 0-3, K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_08_nasaaa_iowaaa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 08, 2012, 11:05:37 pm
There is no sane person on this planet that thinks Anthony Rizzo can fix the Chicago Cubs.

Have you forgotten that we are talking about Cubs fans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 08, 2012, 11:16:23 pm
I thought this week was the cutoff to delay arb.  No?

I wouldn't think so.  For Jackson, maybe, who has no big-league service.  But given all the time Rizzo spend floundering with the Padres last year, he must have accrued some meaningful service time already.  I'd be shocked if arbitration was at issue for him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 08, 2012, 11:48:47 pm
Acosta: 0-4, SB, BB, 3 K

Malave: 1-3, 2 BB, K



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_08_dacrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 09, 2012, 12:20:05 am
It's been said that the Cubs are wary of bringing Rizzo up in a situation in which he's viewed as some kind of savior.  They don't want that sort of pressure on him. If that's the case, ironically, he's more likely to be brought up when the Cubs are not struggling so much.

So 2015, then?


EDIT: Dammit, scooped by Play...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 09, 2012, 04:30:28 am
Anyone care to relay the Baez stuff from the podcast?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 09, 2012, 05:08:25 am
Goldstein said Baez is "really good", has "borderline insane" bat speed and "fantastic hands", and is a "really talented hitter".

Reiterated his claim that Baez isn't a shortstop even though he thinks Baez has the hands, actions and arm for short, but is "a bit heavy-footed" for the position. Said Baez will be a "pretty good" third basemen.

He recounted the details of the 3-0 swing incident. Said the opposing team's pitchers sitting in front of him were irate with one saying he wished he could be in the game to hit Baez himself. A scout near Goldstein said Baez didn't respect the game.

Goldstein also said he got gobs of Tweets from Cubs fans ripping him and defending Baez over the incident.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 09, 2012, 07:20:14 am
He recounted the details of the 3-0 swing incident. Said the opposing team's pitchers sitting in front of him were irate with one saying he wished he could be in the game to hit Baez himself. A scout near Goldstein said Baez didn't respect the game.

Considering how poorly the other team was pitching that day and the difficulty they had getting the ball to go where they wanted, becoming the target of one of their pitchers might not have been a very risky proposition.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 09, 2012, 08:45:09 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 2 K

Rizzo: 1-3, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_09_nasaaa_iowaaa_1


Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_09_dbcafa_tbyafa_1


Tennessee:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_09_msbaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 09, 2012, 08:49:17 pm
With the current state of our major league team and farm system, is it possible that we could get the number one pick in the draft for each of the next three years?  Five years?  More?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 09, 2012, 08:55:54 pm
With the current state of our major league team and farm system, is it possible that we could get the number one pick in the draft for each of the next three years?  Five years?  More?

We not only COULD get it for the next two years, there is a good chance of it.

By the 2015 draft, based on the 2014 season, we should have a middling pick based on what will likely have a middling record.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 09, 2012, 09:20:28 pm
Baez: 0-3, SB, BB, 2 K

Burke: 7-2-0-0-0-9

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_09_kccafx_peoafx_1


Acosta: 0-3, SB, 2 BB, 3 K   (16 K's in 31 AB's)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_09_dchrok_dmerok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 09, 2012, 09:41:03 pm
Arizona Phil with final EST stats. Glad to see Candelario held his own but what the heck happened with Vogelbach? And, once Almora signs it will be interesting to see where the outfielders go (he, along with Dunston, Batista and Trey Martin for instance):

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/06/09/2012-cubs-extended-spring-training-final-stats
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 09, 2012, 09:49:41 pm
what the heck happened with Vogelbach?

194/303/366 and 11 errors at 1B in 32 games.

I think what happened is he stunk.

Very disappointing.

More seriously, I also wonder why he has done so poorly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 09, 2012, 09:50:50 pm
More seriously, I also wonder why he has done so poorly.

He was hand picked by the Chicago Cubs scouting staff.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 09, 2012, 10:23:27 pm
Vitters: 1-2, RBI, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_09_nasaaa_iowaaa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 09, 2012, 11:45:06 pm
Wow, Kyler Burke.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 10, 2012, 08:36:44 am
Torreyes is continuing to quietly turn his season around.  .364/.405/.576/.981 for the last 10 games.   Now up to .210/.274/.295/.570 for the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 10, 2012, 11:54:44 am
Quote
The staff in Boise will receive an initial roster from the Cubs either late Saturday or early Sunday – with a finalized roster to be released to the media on Monday.  However, the roster on Monday may or may not be intact by the time the Hawks hit the field on Friday night at Salem-Keizer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 10, 2012, 02:08:10 pm
Torreyes is continuing to quietly turn his season around.  .364/.405/.576/.981 for the last 10 games.   Now up to .210/.274/.295/.570 for the season.

And he has three more hits today to bring his average over .220.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 10, 2012, 02:34:53 pm
Kirk: 6-5-3-1-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_10_dbcafa_tbyafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 10, 2012, 03:36:24 pm
Two more home runs for Rizzo today.  That slacker, Brett Jackson, only has one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 10, 2012, 03:47:53 pm
And he has three more hits today to bring his average over .220.

Good.

Now if only Vogelbach would start performing....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 10, 2012, 03:54:37 pm
He is performing.

He is just performing badly.

Seriously, I won't start really worrying about Vogelbach until he is hitting in official games.  In Extended Spring Training, you never know how much they are fiddling around with his swing, etc.

Even then, you don't necessarily know all the story.  I mentioned earlier that I read (and I don't know where or when, and despite searching, can not find the source) that Concepcion is throwing mostly fastballs at Peoria because they want to work on commanding that pitch, instead of his breaking pitches.  The source, which I think was the pitching coach, said he would be dominating the league with his off speed stuff.  As I said before, I don't know if it is true or not, but it certainly isn't outside the realm of possibility.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 10, 2012, 04:05:58 pm
Would seem rather odd to tinker with a guy's swing when he had tremendous success with it prior to being drafted. I doubt that's occurred.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 10, 2012, 04:10:30 pm
Jackson: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI, SB, BB, K

Rizzo: 3-5, 2 HR, 4 RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_10_nasaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 10, 2012, 05:11:20 pm
Baez: 1-3, BB, SB

Geiger: 0-4, 3 K,  (0-11, 5 K's)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_10_kccafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 10, 2012, 05:41:44 pm
Baez with his third walk in 44 at bats.  He will never fit in with the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 10, 2012, 06:45:12 pm
Jokisch: 7-1/3 -3-1-1-3

Cabrera: 1-2/3 -4-1-1-0-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_10_msbaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 01:54:38 am
A couple of  video highlights from Rizzo's day Sunday:

http://www.csnchicago.com/06/11/12/WATCH-Anthony-Rizzo-crushes-home-runs-No/nbcsportscubs.html?blockID=722690&feedID=10336
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on June 11, 2012, 02:47:52 pm
I received a text from a friend stating that the Cubs signed Soler for 9 yrs and $30 million.  Seems like the numbers would be off.  I can't imagine Soler would want to sign for 9 years.  I am happy if true as it allows the Cubs to spread the money out.  Of course if it is accurate and he is really good he will renegotiate.

Has anyone else heard anything?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on June 11, 2012, 02:49:27 pm
I received a text from a friend stating that the Cubs signed Soler for 9 yrs and $30 million.  Seems like the numbers would be off.  I can't imagine Soler would want to sign for 9 years.  I am happy if true as it allows the Cubs to spread the money out.  Of course if it is accurate and he is really good he will renegotiate.

Has anyone else heard anything?


Where ya been?  lol

Check out the Cubs in '12 thread.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on June 11, 2012, 02:52:31 pm
I didn't check there as I didn't think it would be covered in the '12 category!!  My bad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on June 11, 2012, 02:57:54 pm
I didn't check there as I didn't think it would be covered in the '12 category!!  My bad.

You're probably right that it should've been in here.  Just snowballed in that thread.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 11, 2012, 03:03:22 pm
Wheee! Assuming the Cubs sign Almora, they'll have the best top 10 position prospects in MLB. Of course, their pitching prospects leave a bit to be desired.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 11, 2012, 03:26:39 pm
Intro from Keith Law Insider bit on Soler (I'm not an insider so can't access the rest).  The article is titled "Soler has the talent of a top-5 pick."

Jorge Soler, the 20-year-old Cuban outfielder the Cubs agreed to terms with today, can show you four-plus tools, and there's enough bat speed and hand strength for him to end up with all five. He has All-Star potential for the Cubs if they're patient enough to wait the 2-3 years he'll take in an optimistic scenario before he is big-league ready.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 11, 2012, 04:16:42 pm
What is the 5th tool that's at issue?  Power?  I thought that was his top tool to start with? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 11, 2012, 04:16:45 pm
Shawon Dunston, Jr interview

5. You are currently finishing up extended spring training in Arizona, have you been assigned to the short season with the Boise Hawks and if so what other Cubs prospects will be joining you?

Yes I’ll be going to short season Boise along with players like Marco Hernandez, Gioskar Amaya, Jeimer Candelario, Roderick Shoulders and others.

http://www.baseballhotcorner.com/ (http://www.baseballhotcorner.com/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 11, 2012, 04:17:38 pm
I would guess speed is the non-plus tool for Soler, since he's 20 and no one is projecting him for CF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 11, 2012, 04:18:19 pm
Seems like if Vogelbach was going to Boise, he would have been one of the first guys Dunston mentioned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 04:23:56 pm
This is what Goldstein tweeted about Soler the other day:

Quote
Jorge Soler is a RF profile guy. BIG power, big arm, ok fielder, holes in swing. He's not historic and he's seen as ready for Low-A.


Incidentally, I don't even know which way Soler hits. I've seen supposed photos that lead me to believe he's a switch-hitter. Anyone know for sure?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 11, 2012, 04:30:12 pm
This is what Goldstein tweeted about Soler the other day:


Incidentally, I don't even know which way Soler hits. I've seen supposed photos that lead me to believe he's a switch-hitter. Anyone know for sure?

I was noticing the same thing, Chris. But I've mostly seen him listed as a RH hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 04:54:02 pm
The Trib article and Jim Callis both say Soler is right-handed and another source called him a RH'd Darryl Strawberry.

So right-handed it is then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Joto4Soto on June 11, 2012, 05:13:17 pm
If this is him in this picture, he's left handed also.  But then again, bleacher report and all, it's probably not him.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1206472-chicago-cubs-would-signing-free-agent-jorge-soler-be-good-or-bad
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 11, 2012, 05:22:26 pm
that bleacher report picture is not him, at least not compared to every other picture I've seen of him (and I don't just mean the lefty/righty thing).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 11, 2012, 05:28:18 pm
Where's Inigo Montoya when you need him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 05:30:23 pm
I think that Bleacher Report photo is what is causing the confusion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 11, 2012, 05:34:01 pm
DaveP asked about whether we knew that college costs don't count toward slot bonus amounts.  Here's Jim Callis a few moments ago:

Jim Callis@jimcallisBA] Does not.     metsprospecthub: Do you know if money given for college counts as part of a bonus?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 11, 2012, 05:38:01 pm
Seems like if Vogelbach was going to Boise, he would have been one of the first guys Dunston mentioned.
Nobody else has asked so I will:  What does Vogelbach weigh now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 11, 2012, 05:38:29 pm
I sent Callis an Ask BA question about MLB scholarship money, how much is it, what all it covers, etc.  I wonder if he'll answer it or not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 05:41:45 pm
Mesa and Boise played against each other in EST today so we have an idea of Boise's lineup.

*

Boise:

Dunston: 2-5, 3B

Amaya: 1-3, SB

Hernandez: 3-5, 3B, 2 RBI

Shoulders: 3-4, 2B, RBI, BB

Candelario: 2-4, 2B, RBI, K

.

Mesa:

Penalver: 3-5, 2 RBI, K

Vogelbach: 3-5, 2B, 3 RBI, 2 K

Schlect: 2-4, 3B, SB

Gretzky: 0-4, K



http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/06/11/will-vogelbach-curse-haunt-boise-hawks
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 11, 2012, 05:49:13 pm
I guess that pretty much confirms Vogelbach to start out at Mesa.

Kind of interesting Dunston is deemed to be more ready for Boise than Vogelbach, even with the struggles we've heard Vogelbach going through in EST. 

Seems to indicate Dunston has more ability at the plate than we thought when we drafted him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 11, 2012, 05:53:17 pm
The Bleacher photo with #51 is Yoenis Cespedes.   Jorge Soler wore #30.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 06:08:41 pm
Quote
The Bleacher photo with #51 is Yoenis Cespedes.

Can't be. Cespedes bats RH and looks nothing like that guy in the photo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 06:09:59 pm
John Manuel really likes Almora:

Quote
Bill Virgl ‏@bill_virgl

@johnmanuelba Soler becomes Cubs #1 prospect?


Quote
@bill_virgl Not once Albert Almora signs. That guy is no myth
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 11, 2012, 06:21:05 pm
I still say Baez tops the list. I can't recall a Cubs prospect with this level of hype about his hit/power tool... ever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 11, 2012, 06:22:59 pm
And whomever your guy is - Baez, Soler, Almora, Rizzo, Jackson - that's a pretty outstanding group of position prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 11, 2012, 06:46:14 pm
Can't be. Cespedes bats RH and looks nothing like that guy in the photo.

Cespedes did have #51 but you're right - that photo is not him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 07:03:17 pm
Jim Callis will be on WGN radio with Dave Kaplan to discuss Soler at 7:15 central.

You can listen here:


http://www.wgnradio.com/about/listen/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 11, 2012, 07:21:36 pm
Among the Jim Callis warnings about Cuban prospects . . .

"Gerardo Concepcion, whom the Cubs signed for $7 million last offseason, doesn't look like he's worth 7 dollars so far."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on June 11, 2012, 07:30:36 pm
LMAO
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 11, 2012, 08:00:11 pm
Among the Jim Callis warnings about Cuban prospects . . .

"Gerardo Concepcion, whom the Cubs signed for $7 million last offseason, doesn't look like he's worth 7 dollars so far."

Well, he's held the other guys to only 6 runs in the first two innings tonight.  Dave's pitching coach must not be letting him use his breaking balls again. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 11, 2012, 08:03:08 pm
I seriously wonder if any of the Hendry leftover scouts are going to pay the price for Concepcion.  Man he's been an ugly signing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 11, 2012, 08:06:40 pm
I think you are laboring under a misconception.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 11, 2012, 08:10:40 pm
I seriously wonder if any of the Hendry leftover scouts are going to pay the price for Concepcion.  Man he's been an ugly signing.

Not if what dave tells us is accurate.

If the guy has been ordered to throw nothing buy fastballs and his off speed stuff is his strong suit and would in fact dominate the league if he were allowed to use it, it is not a bad signing.

If that is true, it might look like terrible handling of him, not letting him use his off speed stuff for even a single game, but not a bad signing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on June 11, 2012, 08:55:14 pm
Two more HRs for Rizzo tonight.  Both off lefties apparently.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 11, 2012, 08:59:28 pm
Rizzo's second HR went a very, very long way too:

http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?content_id=22205003
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 11, 2012, 09:14:20 pm
Remember.  Dave does not know if what Dave said about Concepcion is true.  I not only do not remember the source, but I do not know if the source was reliable.

I was merely pointing out that it is possible that we fans do not know everything that is going on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 11, 2012, 09:18:44 pm
Rizzo's swing is really interesting. His hand start very low as he's waiting for the pitcher to deliver.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 11, 2012, 09:19:47 pm
Just a ground rule double for Rizzo this time through the lineup.  Bum.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 11, 2012, 09:22:55 pm
Rizzo now has 22 HR in 219 AB.

Last year LaHair had 38 HR in 523 AB and 129 games.

Iowa this year is finished their 65 of their 143 games for the season, and Rizzo has played in 59 of them.  They have 77 games left.  He's on pace for about a 45 HR season, and he's hitting more than .370, with an OBP around .430.

I have been one very comfortable with the Cubs leaving him in the minors, but he certainly is not making that decision easy for anyone.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 11, 2012, 09:27:35 pm
Hard not to get caught up in Rizzo-mania. Is his ceiling, say, 90% of Joey Votto's production? Or is that just the mania getting to me?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 11, 2012, 09:32:57 pm
I was in New York over the week end, and got to (had to) listen to New York sports stations.  They did have the Yankee GM on the show, and when he was asked about Soler, he referred to him as having the tool set of a right handed Jason Hayward.  He also said that the Yankees were confident that they would be the winner of the bidding.  (That was Saturday).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 11, 2012, 09:34:17 pm
Rizzo is now 22, and ripping apart AAA.

When Votto was 22 he hit .319 with 22 HR in Chattanooga, AA ball.  Votto's next year he was in AAA and hit .294 with 22 HR, and then did well in a September call-up.

Rizzo only hit 20 HR with a .263 BA in AA... but that was when he was 20.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 11, 2012, 09:35:29 pm
Quote from: Brian Cashman
"I guarantee Soler will be a Yankee.  I have my best man, Jim Hendry, working on it."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 11, 2012, 09:39:45 pm
This is probably just the mania, but I've been wondering a little bit about Votto, too. When he was coming up through the minors, Votto was a respected prospect, but many doubted his ceiling and his power potential. He was seen as a guy you wouldn't mind having on your team at 1B, but Bruce was the kid people really salivated over. That has often been the story on Rizzo, too.

One thing that does look like a significant difference at this time is Rizzo's plate discipline. Votto's walk rates were a couple ticks higher and his k rates a couple ticks lower throughout the minors. On the flip side, Rizzo has shown more power than Votto did in the minors.

Comparing anyone to Votto is a bit silly - Votto is a freak of nature. That said, while I'm not sure how the two actually compare from a scouting perspective, there are some intriguing similarities. It's fun to dream, that's for sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 11, 2012, 09:42:31 pm
So let's see - we have the future ARod (Baez) at 3B, the future Heyward (Soler) in RF, the future Beltran (Almora) in CF, and the future Votto (Rizzo) at 1B? Works for me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 11, 2012, 09:43:41 pm
Throw BJax in LF and the Dynamic-Contact-Duo of Starlin and Torreyes up the middle and we're set!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 09:48:54 pm
Lake: 1-5, HR, RBI, BB, K

McNutt: 3-1/3 -9-9-8-0-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_11_msbaax_tenaax_1


Alcantara: 1-3, SF, RBI, 2 SB, 2 K

Simpson: 1-0-0-0-0-2

Zych: 1-0-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_11_dbcafa_tbyafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 11, 2012, 09:51:41 pm
Rizzo with 22 bombs, .370 BA, 57 RBIs, good defense....season well LESS than half over...nice!

There are other good players coming...and more will follow...the priorities are clear!

Personally, I could care less whether we have the worst record in baseball this season...or one of the worst next!

Finally, we are building something...and, down the road a bit, it's gonna be good!

Who remembers that Tampa Bay used to perenially suck?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 11, 2012, 09:53:51 pm
Don't forget the top or close to the top pick in next year's draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 09:57:58 pm
Geiger: 4-5, HR, 3 RBI

Baez: DNP

Concepcion: 4-11-9-9-3-1


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_11_kccafx_peoafx_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 11, 2012, 09:59:47 pm
Concepcion: 4-11-9-9-3-1

Okay son, break out the off speed stuff
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 11, 2012, 10:05:48 pm
I've got to put Rizzo as a clear #1 on my list.  He's hitting gobs of HR's and has done so all along.  I don't see much reason to think his HR's are fluke, why would they be?  He K's, but he's got 22 HR's to 43 K's.  Gimme a break.  He's been a HR hitter before, and seems to be just getting better at age 22.  He walks fine.  So he's going to hit for power, he's going to hit for solid average, he's going to take some walks, he's not going to K way too much.  What's not to like? 

I think a bird in AAA is worth a bird in Cuba, a bird in Peoria, and a bird in Florida.  I know they are variably faster, and may be better dancers.  But is Almora going to hit HR's?  If he doesn't hit a lot, how good will his average and OBP be?  We have no idea whether Baez will ever get a hit against a breaking ball.  Has he done so yet?  Indications are neither Almora nor Baez will walk much, so they look like their OBP will need to live on BA, which in turn depends on HR's.  Soler, who knows if he'll be able to hit a breaking ball.  Or a big-time fastball. 

I guess I don't see his ceiling being all that much lower.  A little slower, and a good 1B instead of a different position.  But hitting-wise, I don't see how any of them project better for power or IsoD, and with equal or better power or IsoD, he seems to project as well or better for batting average and OBP.

I'll take the sure HR-production, the sure plate discipline, and the sure ability to live with breaking balls over the potential to run faster and play a better position. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 11, 2012, 10:05:49 pm
Concepcion: 4-11-9-9-3-1

Okay son, break out the off speed stuff

IF that is the problem, at some point, if only to reassure Concepcion that he can still pitch effectively, they need to let him use his full arsenal in one game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 10:09:38 pm
Rizzo: 3-4, 2B, 2 HR, 4 RBI, HBP, K

Vitters: 2-4, 2B, RBI, IBB

Jackson: 1-5, 2 K



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_11_omaaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on June 11, 2012, 10:13:26 pm
Not sure what Rizzo has left to prove in AAA.  At some point it is almost counter productive to leave him there.  I know they don't want his clock starting early but he is as ready as he is going to get.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 11, 2012, 10:15:41 pm
I think I read that they only have to wait until June 22 or 23 to get an extra year of service time.  If they can find something to do with Soriano, seems like Rizzo will be up by the 24th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 11, 2012, 10:19:32 pm
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_11_msbaax_tenaax_1

Since walking four guys in 1/3 of an inning on opening day and going on the DL, Matt Loosen has a 1.90 ERA since then, with 47K/15BB/48.2 innings, and a WHIP below 1.  His K-rate has been better than K-per-inning over his last batch of starts.  Turned 23 earlier this season.  Not sure what he's got, but I'm going to keep watching as long as he keeps producing. 

Austin Kirk's 2.63 ERA is also interesting.  Gave up 6 ER in one poor start, but he's put up a lot of good ones.  His K-rate isn't any good (46K/79 innings, yuck), but 18 walks and only 1 HR is pretty good.  He turned 22 a couple weeks ago, I hadn't realize he was that old.  He obviously wasn't one of those 17-year-old picks, he was 19 when he was drafted out of HS.  Still, interesting as long as he's throwing strikes. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 11, 2012, 10:21:25 pm
Probably the best thing for Concepcion to do at this point is to send him on a mercy assignment to Mesa. 

Or at the very least, find out of he's hurt.  Sheesh, at some point, he had to look good enough to Oneri, Paul Weaver, and the rest of the Theocracy to merit a $7 million contract.  At the very least, there's no way he's pitching with the same kind of stuff he was showing back when they signed him. 

It certainly doesn't seem like they can be doing him any good by sending him out there every 5th day to get hammered by Low-A hitters while he's pitching like this.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 11, 2012, 10:27:17 pm
Well said, Craig...Rizzo has to be #1 as of now...no one close...a "bird in hand..."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 11, 2012, 10:29:43 pm
Kevin Rhoderick sure continues to get it done in a big way!

What does he throw?   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 10:34:53 pm
Quote
What does he throw?


92-94 mph, hard slider

At least, that was the report on his last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 11, 2012, 10:36:55 pm
If Craig is saying that Rizzo is the Cubs # 1 prospect, I certainly have to agree with that.  When Soler, Almora and Baez reach AAA, I would be overjoyed if any of them performed as well as rizzo is doing now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 11, 2012, 10:38:06 pm
Acosta: 1-4, 2 K, E

Garcia: 3-1/3 -2-0-0-0-1


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_11_dmerok_dchrok_1


Carlos Rodriguez: 5-1-0-0-1-6  ( 10 IP, 2 BB, 13 K )  (16 year old LHP signed last fall)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_11_dcurok_dorrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 11, 2012, 10:48:02 pm
Anthony Rizzo is the Cubs #1 prospect.

No doubt about it.

He's only 22 and he's crushing AAA pitching in Iowa, which is in the more reasonable part of the PCL.

Whenever there's a question for me, the player that's doing better at the higher level is my choice.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 11, 2012, 11:00:49 pm
DaveP if any of Almora/Baez/Soler do what Felix Pie did at AAA at age 22 (.973 OPS in 55 games) I'd be happy.
Crud, now I'm sad about being a Cubs' fan again....

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 11, 2012, 11:51:30 pm
I don't see Rizzo as a #1.  Very, very good - but not ahead of Baez.  Too early to say about Soler, and I'm still not convinced Jackson isn't going to be the better player - but I can't ignore this season and I nudge Rizzo ahead of him for now.

I worry a little about the holes in Rizzo's swing, which were exposed last year when he was truly awful after callup - he didn't struggle, he tanked.  His swing is long and a little loopy, and I don't see him as a guy who's going to hit for average.  He seems to have a very high floor - hard not to see him as a starter with a good glove, patience and 40 HR power.  But I think he's going to be Carlos Pena with a better average (say a .260 career) and while that's terrific, it's not a superstar.  Baez may never be that good, but I think he has the potential to be better (so does Soler, it seems).  Plus Rizzo is a 1B, and while he's apparently very good there, 1B is a position you can slide guys to when they can't play anywhere else.  Baez is (and I believe he'll stick) a SS at best, 3B at worst.  Soler projects as a plus-plus RF, and Jackson can play a plus CF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 12, 2012, 12:03:38 am
Well, Dan, that's a gutsy call...and you may turn out to be right....but the last guy with numbers in AAA Rizzo's zip code has turned out to be pretty good with the stick (and Rizzo's numbers are way better so far than even LaHair's AAA numbers).  Of course, MLB is something else.

I would also say that a plus defensive 1B, is worth a whole lot! 

It is easy to find some Fred McGriff as a Cub-type "stiff," but a good defensive player at 1B really helps!

If ANY of Baez, Soler, Almora (or others) plays nearly as well in AAA (or any other level) than Rizzo has, WOW! 

More inventory of top prospects even better than Rizzo would be REALLY nice!  Certainly, that's priority #1!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 12, 2012, 12:07:00 am
Of Rizzo, Soler, Almora and Baez, it is very likely that 2 of them will fail.  One of them might reach his ceiling.  If the second is an all star, we have done well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 12, 2012, 12:29:37 am
Boise roster

http://mlblogsboisehawksradio.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/6-12-12hawks-roster.pdf
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 12, 2012, 07:45:30 am
But I think he's going to be Carlos Pena with a better average (say a .260 career) and while that's terrific, it's not a superstar.

Rizzo is now 22 and tearing up AAA.

When Carlos Pena was 22 he was in AA for the full season and had a hitting line of .299/.414/.533/947 with 22 HR in 138 games.

Rizzo has a hitting line of .370/.423/.753/1.176 with 22 HR in 59 games.

Since we are not pro scouts who have spent several days looking at both players at the same age and studied videotape of them. the only meaningful comparison we have for them is how each performed at the same age or level.

I apologize for thinking Rizzo might possibly look a bit more favorable in that comparison.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on June 12, 2012, 08:04:35 am
All along I thought the Cubs would bring up Rizzo as soon as they were assured of the extra year of control sometime around June 23rd.  The Cubs are desperately trying to trade Soriano so my guess is that until Soriano is dealt, Rizzo will stay in the minors.  If the Cubs are unable to trade Soriano, I have a feeling that they will deal LaHair instead if they get a good offer.  Somehow, one of the two has to be off the team for Rizzo to be able to play every day.  Until that happens, Rizzo will probably stay in Iowa so that Soriano and LaHair can keep getting at bats and be "showcased". 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 12, 2012, 08:20:49 am
All along I thought the Cubs would bring up Rizzo as soon as they were assured of the extra year of control sometime around June 23rd.  The Cubs are desperately trying to trade Soriano so my guess is that until Soriano is dealt, Rizzo will stay in the minors.  If the Cubs are unable to trade Soriano, I have a feeling that they will deal LaHair instead if they get a good offer.  Somehow, one of the two has to be off the team for Rizzo to be able to play every day.  Until that happens, Rizzo will probably stay in Iowa so that Soriano and LaHair can keep getting at bats and be "showcased". 

Unless they decide to put LaHair in RF and move DeJesus to CF.

Or they trade Dejesus.

Or someone gets injured.

Or they see what Soriano can do at this point back at 2B

Well, at least three other possibilities.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 12, 2012, 08:21:52 am
The Cubs are very fortunate that Soriano has gotten hot.  It should be possible to move him to a contending AL team soon (with the Cubs paying the vast majority of his salary).  That will allow the Cubs to get a good look at LaHair in the OF while letting Rizzo ease into a ML role without any added pressure that he might have felt on a contender.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 12, 2012, 08:30:57 am
The Cubs are very fortunate that Soriano has gotten hot.  It should be possible to move him to a contending AL team soon (with the Cubs paying the vast majority of his salary).  That will allow the Cubs to get a good look at LaHair in the OF while letting Rizzo ease into a ML role without any added pressure that he might have felt on a contender.

I think it is likely more important that the Cubs let other teams get a good look at LaHair in the OF than the Cubs themselves get a good look at him there.

Given his age and the condition of the franchise, I still think it makes much more sense to trade LaHair if he continues to hit.  He will be far more valuable to an overperforming low budget team wanting to exploit their chances now and in the next two years than he will be to the Cubs who will win  nothing this year or next and will only be starting to become truly interesting when LaHair's performance begins an age-related decline.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on June 12, 2012, 08:31:40 am
That's what I'm hoping will happen as well Play.  I have to believe someone will take Soriano as a DH.  He hit the ball really well in Minnesota.  Hopefully some AL team that is desperate for some production from the DH spot will take a chance on Soriano.  The question is, will Soriano approve a trade to a team like Baltimore?  Hopefully he does and we can see if LaHair can be an everyday outfielder for the last two months of the season. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 12, 2012, 11:30:28 am
It's not necessary to trade Soriano before Rizzo is called up.  With Soriano, LaHair and Rizzo all on the roster each of them could basically play 3 out of 4 days if you rotate DeJesus into CF on one of those days.  I don't see it as a problem.  Rizzo should be called up when it's best for his development (which TBH was about a month ago) and not contingent on dumping Soriano's contract.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 12, 2012, 11:31:09 am
What Deeg said. Keep him down till you gain the year of control at this point, bring him up on the next plane.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on June 12, 2012, 11:51:24 am
Quote
Geiger: 4-5, HR, 3 RBI

Is P2 falling down on the job, or have I just forgotten it?  Maybe it's too obvious.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 12, 2012, 12:03:32 pm
I bet something happens with Soriano in the next week or two, though, and having Soriano, Rizzo, and LaHair all at the same time never even becomes an issue.  History tells us that after every Soriano hot streak, there's an inevitable cold streak where he looks like a player you wouldn't even want on your team for free.  This isn't anti-Soriano bias...it's just what all of us have observed for the last 5 1/2 years. 

The front office knows that too, so they're probably working the phones as fast as they can.  He's never going to be more tradeable than he is right now.  And if the cold streak hits soon and continues into July, they might not be able to find a taker at the deadline just like they couldn't find a taker in the offseason.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 12, 2012, 01:42:05 pm
Hayden Simpson is now pitching for Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 12, 2012, 01:46:14 pm
Hayden Simpson is now pitching for Boise.

Ah, progress.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2012, 02:46:53 pm
Rizzo hurt his leg sliding into the dugout fence while trying to catch a foul popup today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 12, 2012, 02:48:19 pm
Rizzo hurt his leg sliding into the dugout fence while trying to catch a foul popup today.

That is definitely no good.  Knowing Cub luck, it's Bill Mueller, Part II.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2012, 03:00:01 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 3 K

Rizzo: 0-2 (left in the 6th)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_12_omaaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 12, 2012, 03:41:01 pm
Bruce Miles ‏@BruceMiles2112
Rizzo checks out ok initially after leaving Iowa game with injury, Theo said. #Cubs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2012, 06:32:26 pm
Rizzo allegedly has a knee contusion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2012, 06:48:23 pm
Acosta: 0-3, BB, 2 K, 2 E  ( 20 K's in 38 AB's )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_12_dyarok_dchrok_1


Sanchez: 0-5, 3 K, E   ( 1-23 overall )

Paulino: 4-2/3 -4-4-3-0-5   ( 9-2/3 IP, 0 BB, 15 K )


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_12_dcurok_ddirok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on June 12, 2012, 07:12:20 pm
Rizzo allegedly has a knee contusion.

When do they amputate?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 12, 2012, 07:16:25 pm
Iowa lost to KC's AAA team. I think that everyone would be cool with Almora signing with the Cubs and having a trajectory similar to KC's future CF Wil Myers:
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=CF&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=571976
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 12, 2012, 07:22:58 pm
Paul Sullivan ‏@PWSullivan
Rizzo has right knee contusion from collision w/ wall. He's OK supposedly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2012, 07:43:16 pm
Goldstein tweets about Gerardo Concepcion:


Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

@BleacherNation FB is just average, can spin a breaking ball, but scouts aren't seeing anything special.


Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

Scouts have not been kind. RT @ChiMike702: @Kevin_Goldstein Is there a point this year when the Cubs should be worried about Concepcion?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on June 12, 2012, 08:31:17 pm
Our farm system is really starting to show signs of life now with Rizzo,Jackson,Almora,Soler,Baez,Szczur,McNutt and a few others.

Im buying into all of this. Blow it all up and start all over building through your farm system. I'd trade every veteran we had and wouldnt think twice about it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2012, 08:42:00 pm
Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_12_dbcafa_breafa_1


Tennessee off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 12, 2012, 08:42:07 pm
Our farm system is a disaster.  Always has been, always will be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 12, 2012, 08:58:59 pm
Our farm system is a disaster.  Always has been, always will be.

Some things may have changed under the new management, but those seeking stability will be happy to discover that Jeff has not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 12, 2012, 09:09:46 pm
I think, Ron, JeffH is just being critical of the US food supply.  He's what we call a localvore. Good for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2012, 09:51:21 pm
Baez: 2-4, SB, K, 3 E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_12_peoafx_belafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 12, 2012, 10:06:15 pm
Three errors?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 12, 2012, 10:09:45 pm
Yes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 12, 2012, 10:23:49 pm
Thant's 5 in 14 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 13, 2012, 12:17:42 am
Just got back from Beloit.  Saw one of the worst played games I have ever seen, (and I have been to a lot of minor league games).

The good.  Michael Jensen was not nearly as bad as the score indicated.  He was the victim of some of the worst fielding you could have.  Three errors by Baez and two by Geiger that I remember, and there may have been more that I repressed.

There was no gun at the game that I could see, but Jensen looked fast.  Faster, even, then Suarez, who is 8 feet tall and 500 lbs, or looked it when he replaced Jensen, who was on some sort of pitch count.

Baez put on quite an exhibition during batting practice, hitting 4 or 5 out of the park.  He does not have as long a swing as I expected, and he took one out to right field that looked like a rocket off the bat.  During the game he had a ground out to third, a ground single to left field, and a ground single to center.  Don't remember his other at bat.  He went fairly deep into the count a couple of times.    He also stole second and then third base, generating a run.  He is faster than I expected.

DeVoss didn't seem to have a problem at second base, but he wasn't really tested very much.

I hope to go to tomorrow night's game.  If anyone has any specific questions that don't require a professional's observation, ask them before dinner time tomorrow.

By the way, I got a foul ball during batting practice and had Baez autograph it.  If he ever makes it to the hall of fame, it was the first home run ball he hit in the majors.  You will be able to bid on it on Ebay.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 13, 2012, 07:16:30 am
davep, how did Baez look in the field?  Three errors sounds sort of, not good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 13, 2012, 07:46:12 am
Dave, did Geiger look notably powerful in BP, if you saw him?

Did Jensen show much for breaking ball or change?  Any sense?  I'm guessing he's maybe a slider guy, which are hard to distinguish from the fastball/sinker? 

Any thoughts on how Baez and Geiger looked versus breaking balls?  Helpless?  Or maybe OK? 

I'm guessing maybe Rosario tonight?  I'll look forward to a report on him.  He's been doing well lately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 13, 2012, 09:26:36 am
That "fluff" piece about Baez is a video and the second half is just watching his swing during some game time ... it looks really quirky to me .... like his loading is going to give him problems ... seems to take too long.  His hands are fast, but that swing looks broken.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 13, 2012, 11:46:15 am
davep, how did Baez look in the field?  Three errors sounds sort of, not good.

Baez made one good play that I remember, coming over second base to get a grounder, but for the most part, he just looked like a kid that took his eyes off the ball too often.  I wouldn't place too much scouting value on one game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 13, 2012, 11:51:31 am
Dave, did Geiger look notably powerful in BP, if you saw him?

Did Jensen show much for breaking ball or change?  Any sense?  I'm guessing he's maybe a slider guy, which are hard to distinguish from the fastball/sinker? 

Any thoughts on how Baez and Geiger looked versus breaking balls?  Helpless?  Or maybe OK? 

I'm guessing maybe Rosario tonight?  I'll look forward to a report on him.  He's been doing well lately.

To be honest, I don't remember Geiger in batting practice.

Jensen kept the ball low, and some of his fastballs were probably really sliders.  He seemed to have pretty good control, until all the errors obviously got him a little off his game.

I only say one curve ball (that I recognized) to Baez, and he took it for a ball.  Did not notice with Geiger.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 13, 2012, 03:11:37 pm
Rizzo and Jackson both sat for Iowa's game today:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_13_omaaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 13, 2012, 03:25:34 pm
So Jackson tore his ACL too?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: EightyTwo on June 13, 2012, 05:03:14 pm
So Jackson tore his ACL too?

Nope.  Broke his back.  He was out being fitted for a wheelchair.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 13, 2012, 05:15:59 pm

ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @peoriachiefs DId you know:Since he joined Chiefs(5/28),only 4 players in all of Class A have more SB than Baez(7).He has not been caught
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 13, 2012, 09:09:35 pm
Lake: 2-4, 3B

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_13_biraax_tenaax_1


Daytona suspended.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 13, 2012, 09:31:21 pm
Baez: 2-3, HR, 2 RBI, HBP, K

Geiger: 2-5, HR, 2 RBI

Rosario: 6-1/3 IP, 1 R


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_13_peoafx_belafx_1


Chiefs' Twitter:


Quote
peoriachiefs : Holy cow that ball was crushed....by Javier Baez. Over the scoreboard here at Pohlman Field. Completely over the scoreboard. into the trees
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 13, 2012, 09:37:45 pm
The HBP was the next AB after the HR.  The guy who hit him wasn't immediately ejected or anything, so perhaps it was just a coincidence?  I look forward to DaveP's account of that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 13, 2012, 09:45:57 pm
Baez is special.  I don't care that he has a mean streak - I like it, in fact.  He's got a chance to be a star.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 13, 2012, 10:00:36 pm
That's four very good starts in a row for Rosario.  So, maybe there's something good happening there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 13, 2012, 10:08:36 pm
Baez is special. I don't care that he has a mean streak - I like it, in fact.  He's got a chance to be a star.

What Deeg said.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on June 13, 2012, 10:28:09 pm
Agreed...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 13, 2012, 10:33:36 pm
Baez obviously has some big-time talents, i.e. power.  Interesting how the BA pre-draft accounts didn't really seem to paint that story.  Good power, yes, but not the WOW type power.

Will be interesting to see how Baez's offense holds up over time, and against better pitching.  Too soon to tell whether he'll have the pitch recognition and contact skill to hit movement.  Has he gotten a hit on anything but fastballs yet since joining Peoria?  Hopefully he's got it all, and he'll be a star.  But sometimes it's not what you do best that defines your career, it's what you do worst. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 13, 2012, 10:36:58 pm
Just got back from Beloit.

If today was a typical day for Baez, we are in for some treats in the years to come.  In his first at bat, he took two pitches in the dirt, and then lined an outside pitch into right field.  In his second at bat, he worked the count to I believe 3 and 1, and then hit a letter high pitch out of the park.  The fence where it went out was about 365 feet from home plate, with a 10 foot high fence.  On top of the fence was a scoreboard more than 20 feet high.  His home run cleared the top of that scoreboard by about 30 feet.  I later asked the Beloit announcer how far he thought it was hit, and he said about 430 feet.

In his third at bat he took a slow curve off his left shoulder, moving into it as well as Chad Myers ever did.  He struck out swinging on his fourth at bat, but at no time all night did I see him swing at a pitch that seemed to be out of the strike zone.

He was flawless in the field, handling 4 or 5 easy chances and making two excellent plays, one going into the hole to get a fast runner, with Hoilman making a good catch on a one bounce throw.  On the other, he went over second base to throw out another.  On the routine plays, his throws were strong and letter high (Hoilman has high letters).

He also did the little things you want to see.  With men on first and second and no one out, there was a grounder between short and third.  Baez went to his right for the ball, but Geiger cut it off to try for the double play.  Baez immediately went to cover third base in case the runner overran the bag.  All in all, it was a great game for Baez.

For those who wonder about Geiger's power, he later hit a home run almost in the exact place and the same distance as Baez's.

Roserio was outstanding.  he threw mostly fastballs, but he also threw 7 or 8 pitches that were either a curve (I was not in position to see a break on the ball) or a change up.  I think everyone was a strike.  There was a guy with a gun several seats away from me, but I couldn't see the readings.  After the 6th inning, I went over there to ask how fast Roserio was throwing.  he said he was typically 92 - 94 and hit 96 twice.

DeVoss has no business at second base.

Cervenko struck out 2 of the 3 batters he faced, one on a fly to center and the next two swing.  he was nothing that I had expected.  He threw a fastball that was at least as fast as Rosario, and he had a good curve that broke into a right handed hitter.  Almost all his pitches were strikes.

Hoilman is big.

Darvil is tiny.  He is listed at 6' 2" but he sure didn't look it.  However, I saw him standing next to Hoilman, so maybe it was misleading.

One last thing.  When I asked the scout about Rosario, after he told me the speed, he said "Come back tomorrow.  Burke is better".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 13, 2012, 10:41:53 pm
Thanks, Dave.  Nice report.  Yes, much funner report than yesterday's.  The reports on Rosario, Geiger, and Cervenka all encouraging. 

Nice to hear that Baez was working some counts a little bit.  And that the HBP was not a retaliation because he'd done something obnoxious. 

The Geiger power is encouraging.  Not sure what else he's got, and whether he'll hit the ball often enough for it to matter, or play acceptable defense.  But it would be fun if it turns out he's got genuine power. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 13, 2012, 10:41:59 pm
I don't think Burke pitched much at all in HS, so he is standing out as a pitcher with very little experience on the mound.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 13, 2012, 10:53:26 pm
Yes, thanks Dave. That was very informative.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 13, 2012, 11:25:28 pm
This link contains the highlight package from one of Baez' games that I posted last week plus about 2 extra minutes of reporting/interview and a couple additional highlights.


http://www.cinewsnow.com/sports/Chiefs-shortstop-Baez-is-top-Cubs-prospect-158736315.html?vid=a
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 12:30:43 am
Quote
In an otherwise horrible year for the Cubs, Rizzo and Epstein and Soler represent hope.

Cubs fans won't like what I'm about to write:

Not everyone believes Rizzo is going to be as good as his super minor-league numbers.

"I'm not totally convinced yet," said one rival scout who has seen Rizzo play several times this year with Triple-A Iowa. "He feasts on bad pitching. He might just be an average [hitting] first baseman."

Cubs fans look at Rizzo's Iowa numbers and expect much more than that. In 60 games, the 22-year-old leads the Pacific Coast League with 22 home runs. He has a .367 batting average and a 1.173 OPS.

He had back-to-back two home run games this week, and Cubs fans exhaled when the report came back that a knee injury isn't serious.

"He's done everything he can down there," Cubs manager Dale Sveum told reporters this week.

Well, almost everything.

"He really does a good job of hitting the weaker pitching," the scout said.



http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/danny-knobler/19347699/cubs-prospect-rizzo-has-great-numbers-but-not-all-are-convinced
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 14, 2012, 12:31:02 am
Thanks for the great report, Dave!   Will you be able to watch/report on KBurke?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 14, 2012, 12:40:14 am
Mildly interesting Rock Shoulders story

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/06/13/2153128/its-all-in-his-name-for-new-hawk.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 12:44:28 am
Santana: 5-4-1-1-1-5

Malave: 1-3, BB, K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_13_dchrok_dyarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 12:48:45 am
Quote
New leadership in Chicago means changes trickling down throughout the Cubs organization. New in Boise this year: pitch charts for practice and games, ideally teaching prospects to wait for just the right pitch.

"It's a huge change," second-year Manager Mark Johnson said. "They're a little more precise in what they want: base-running, and they've got a whole new philosophy about hitting, not swinging at bad pitches."

Johnson calls it a 'chase count;' tracking the bad pitches players swing at - regardless of if it turns into a home run or third strike.

"In the long run, it applies," said Johnson. "It's really good for the young kids to learn plate discipline and stuff like that."

"You have to take ownership of your at-bats," said outfielder Shawon Dunston, Jr.

The change hasn't been easy.

"I was a free-swinger in high school," Dunston said. "I wasn't very patient, but now I'm getting more and more [patient] every day and learning to swing at my pitch and not the pitcher's pitch."

New hitting coach Bill Buckner has most of the responsibility for tracking the numbers. At extended spring in Mesa, Buckner arrived at the ballpark at 6 a.m. to check video and start reports before the players hit the cages at seven.

"Even in batting practice, if they swing at a bad pitch, we've got to tell them," the former Cub and Red Sox player said.


http://www.kboi2.com/sports/Hawks-arrive-with-a-new-approach-to-batting-158979505.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on June 14, 2012, 12:49:59 am
you got to be able to hit the weak pitching before you can hit the stronger pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 14, 2012, 01:37:38 am
Indeed - feasting on weak pitching can go a long way in the big leagues if you take some walks and have light-tower power.

I see some limitations on Rizzo's upside, and I don't think he'll be a star.  He has holes in his swing that will likely always be there, and that good pitchers will exploit.  But even good pitchers make mistakes sometimes.  I can see a typical Rizzo year as something like .250-260, 30 HRS, a .330-.340 OBP and high .400s SLG.  That's not a star, but it's a very nice player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 14, 2012, 01:59:32 am
That's Aubrey Huff.  I would be disappointed with that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 14, 2012, 06:18:05 am
Quote
Not everyone believes Rizzo is going to be as good as his super minor-league numbers.

Well duh.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 14, 2012, 06:21:24 am
Quote
New leadership in Chicago means changes trickling down throughout the Cubs organization. New in Boise this year: pitch charts for practice and games, ideally teaching prospects to wait for just the right pitch.

"It's a huge change," second-year Manager Mark Johnson said. "They're a little more precise in what they want: base-running, and they've got a whole new philosophy about hitting, not swinging at bad pitches."

Johnson calls it a 'chase count;' tracking the bad pitches players swing at - regardless of if it turns into a home run or third strike.

"In the long run, it applies," said Johnson. "It's really good for the young kids to learn plate discipline and stuff like that."

"You have to take ownership of your at-bats," said outfielder Shawon Dunston, Jr.

The change hasn't been easy.

"I was a free-swinger in high school," Dunston said. "I wasn't very patient, but now I'm getting more and more [patient] every day and learning to swing at my pitch and not the pitcher's pitch."

New hitting coach Bill Buckner has most of the responsibility for tracking the numbers. At extended spring in Mesa, Buckner arrived at the ballpark at 6 a.m. to check video and start reports before the players hit the cages at seven.

"Even in batting practice, if they swing at a bad pitch, we've got to tell them," the former Cub and Red Sox player said.

I think the encouraging thing from an article like that is some of the holdover coaches are buying into the new Cub way of doing things. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 14, 2012, 07:15:03 am
Quote
HAWKS NAME OPENING DAY STARTER
Dominican Republic product Jose Arias will start the first game for Boise at Salem-Keizer on Friday. Pitching coach David Rosario likes what he’s seen from Arias in spring training. “He can go from 92 to 97 (mph),” Rosario said. “He’s a big, tall athletic guy with a lot of future. He’s definitely one of the most talented kids that we have got here.” Arias played in the Dominican Summer League last year.

Read more here: http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/06/14/2154549/converting-his-career-not-goals.html#storylink=cpy (http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/06/14/2154549/converting-his-career-not-goals.html#storylink=cpy)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 14, 2012, 07:44:37 am
Quote
...New in Boise this year: pitch charts for practice and games, ideally teaching prospects to wait for just the right pitch.  "...they've got a whole new philosophy about hitting, not swinging at bad pitches."
"I was a free-swinger in high school," Dunston said. "I wasn't very patient, but now I'm getting more and more [patient] every day and learning to swing at my pitch and not the pitcher's pitch."
..."Even in batting practice, if they swing at a bad pitch, we've got to tell them," the former Cub and Red Sox player said.

Very interesting.  This sounds really good.  That they'd do something like this in games, that's one thing.  That they are charting practice as well, that takes it to a different and higher level, maybe.  I hadn't anticipated that.  I wonder how they do this, technically. They've got fixed video equipment that can record everything and is not obstructed by catcher or umpire or batting coach or anything?  And that they can take on the road, too?  Or they'll only do this at Mesa and at home?  Or is there some hand-held stuff so that basically every team needs a hitting coach and a pitching coach and a videographer who does it all herself, or who is a video coach who has to teach all the players how to do it right?  Or are these hand-written subjective human charts?  Buckner is both batting coach and umpire in evaluating whether a pitch is good or bad?  He says he's "got" to tell them (does he actually want to?)  Does he have some electronic device that gives an instant reading?  Or he's got to judge himself on the spot?  Or just have a video session with the guy and tell him tomorrow morning? 


Funny, when I first read "...they've got a whole new philosophy about hitting, not swinging at bad pitches", it read as if the new philosophy was to not swing at bad pitches!  ("Wow, Fleita always told us to teach the kids to be aggressive, now they've got this radical new philosophy to NOT swing at BAD pitches!  Wow, revolutionary, man.....!")  Obviously the new philosophy is about how to train them to not swing at bad pitches, but I thought it was funny to read. 


Sounds great,however it works in details.  I'd think using this in XST also makes especially good sense.  They've got a ton of arms down there, so I suspect when a guy is taking batting practice it's often against a pitcher, rather than a machine or Dale Sveum or some 50-year-old coach throwing 60-mph straight-balls. 

Quote
Johnson calls it a 'chase count;' tracking the bad pitches players swing at - regardless of if it turns into a home run or third strike.


That's a good term to remember and use. 


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 14, 2012, 08:32:25 am
Thanks, Chris, for the article about tracking "chase" pitches as a mechanism for training hitters to be more selective.  Fascinating stuff, providing a glimpse at what Theo/Jed/Jason consider to be the "Cubs Way."  The Dunston's comments were very interesting as well.  Assuming he really is becoming more selective, perhaps that explains why he seems to be doing better than many expected when he was drafted.

Folks have wondered how the new regime was going to actualize their plans to implement their philosophy. This is clearly one specific example. These guys strike me as both very bright and detail oriented. Some people mocked the idea of a "Cubs Way Manual," but I imagine that this is exactly the sort of thing that is in there ... practices that will be applied at each level that are designed to embed the philosophical values that they've been espousing since coming to the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 14, 2012, 08:43:18 am
"Very bright and detail oriented" really help...throw in "strategic and planful" because they apply, too.

It's gonna take time...no doubt about that!   But we're going to see the "inventory" of "impact" talent continue to grow and the organizational "practices" be driven with increasing intensity.   So will accountability.

It's an excellent blueprint! 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 14, 2012, 08:48:21 am
"He really does a good job of hitting the weaker pitching," the scout said.

That is what all good hitters do.

"It's a huge change," second-year Manager Mark Johnson said. "They're a little more precise in what they want: base-running, and they've got a whole new philosophy about hitting, not swinging at bad pitches."

Johnson calls it a 'chase count;' tracking the bad pitches players swing at - regardless of if it turns into a home run or third strike.

"In the long run, it applies," said Johnson. "It's really good for the young kids to learn plate discipline and stuff like that."...

"Even in batting practice, if they swing at a bad pitch, we've got to tell them," the former Cub and Red Sox player said.


This stuff is so damb basic that it is sad to realize this is NEW, seen as some major innovation, some dramatic change and break with the past.  Obviously it IS all of those things, but teams should have been doing this decades ago.

I see some limitations on Rizzo's upside, and I don't think he'll be a star.  He has holes in his swing that will likely always be there, and that good pitchers will exploit. 

"Holes in his swing..."  Just what do you mean by that as used in reference to Rizzo and what do you identify as his "holes"?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on June 14, 2012, 09:10:53 am
See Choi, Hee-Sop
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on June 14, 2012, 09:44:31 am
Thanks for the great report, Dave. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 14, 2012, 12:20:37 pm
Cubs Den

Baseball America has a nice article on the quickly improving Matt Szczur.  Observers note that Szczur has the ability to adapt quickly because of his athleticism, coachability, work ethic, and overall mental makeup.  Hmmm... haven't we been saying that all along here?  Szczur, by the way, is recovering from a sore knee that is not believed to be serious.  He's on the DL but the Cubs seem to expect him to be activated soon.  They are just being cautious.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 12:21:48 pm
Piece on Baez' transition to Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120613&content_id=33265548&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 14, 2012, 12:54:37 pm
See Choi, Hee-Sop

Examples are not quite explanations.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 14, 2012, 01:03:55 pm
Cubs Den

Baseball America has a nice article on the quickly improving Matt Szczur.  Observers note that Szczur has the ability to adapt quickly because of his athleticism, coachability, work ethic, and overall mental makeup.  Hmmm... haven't we been saying that all along here?  Szczur, by the way, is recovering from a sore knee that is not believed to be serious.  He's on the DL but the Cubs seem to expect him to be activated soon.  They are just being cautious.

Certainly not everyone.  Some posters have at times seemingly come close to writing him off.

It would be nice to see him do well enough when he returns, and well enough early next year, that in a 2013 season where the team Cubs will almost certainly be taking some lumps the Szczur gets some significant playing time in CF and starts to grow into an extended stay there and at the top of the batting order.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 14, 2012, 01:08:46 pm
Piece on Baez' transition to Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120613&content_id=33265548&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb

This photo of Baez starting his swing is taken from the link Chris posted.

http://www.milb.com/images/2012/06/13/LSdnifWT.jpg
(http://www.milb.com/images/2012/06/13/LSdnifWT.jpg)

Does anyone else think the way he has the bat leaning forward may lengthen his swing?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 14, 2012, 01:54:47 pm
Dave, thanks for the bit about Szczur.  Glad to hear it's not a serious injury, and that there's some positivity about his progress.  jes, having him next year seems too rushy, apart from a token September callup.  He's learning, let him learn.  I'm happy with his progress, but give him time to keep learning and progressing.  I think we should take it kind of slow and steady with him and kind of give him time to figure things out.  I like his progress, but don't think he's close now.   He's hitting .267 in A-ball with no power.  And while he's as old as Vitters (22) and only a year younger than Jackson, he's had less than 750 AB's as a pro.  He's got time to learn.  This minor-league season is half-over already, so it's not like he's got that that much time to improve before next year. 

Ron, I'm very pleased with some of the news this week.  See-your-pitch-and-drive-it, that's so basic that I wondered if the new guys were teaching anything different than the old guys that might lead to better results.  The Jaramillo firing suggests that some nuanced difference in approach does exist.  And regardless of philosophy, the much more detailed pitch charting suggests a different and improved/focussed practical process for helping hitters.  Fleita wanted more selective hitters too, but hadn't implemented an equivalent process for tracking and remediating. 

The Baez article touched on something I think makes a ton of sense.  Fleita said that at Mesa, he had lots more practice.  Time spent on the bus from Peoria to Grant Rapids is instead spent practicing baseball stuff.  I suspect that Mesa is a much better teaching/learning environment than being on a full-season club.  As fans, we always like guys getting to full-season ASAP, because then we get easy box scores.  And if a guy does excel, he's fewer steps away from the top.  But in terms of actual training/development, I suspect Mesa is generally better, until/unless a guy reaches a point where his hitting is too good for the pitching that he sees there. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 02:32:40 pm
Struck: 5-2/3 -4-0-0-0-3

Cabrera: 2-1-0-0-0-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_14_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 14, 2012, 02:46:15 pm
jes, having him next year seems too rushy, apart from a token September callup.  He's learning, let him learn.  I'm happy with his progress, but give him time to keep learning and progressing.  I think we should take it kind of slow and steady with him and kind of give him time to figure things out.  I like his progress, but don't think he's close now.   He's hitting .267 in A-ball with no power.  And while he's as old as Vitters (22) and only a year younger than Jackson, he's had less than 750 AB's as a pro.  He's got time to learn.  This minor-league season is half-over already, so it's not like he's got that that much time to improve before next year.

It all depends on how he does, and where the Cubs believe he would continue to develop best.

My comments was that I would like to see him do well enough on his return AND EARLY NEXT YEAR to be called up next year.  Granted that would mean he picks up the pace quite a bit.  It also assumes that the Cubs believe he is someone who would continue to grow and develop well in the majors.

My point is that the concern with Szczur next year should not really be whether he is ready to help the Cubs win games in deciding whether to call him up, but instead whether he is ready in his development, whether calling him up would likely accelerate that development or retard it.  To an extent that my depend on what he still needs to work on, but it will also depend in large part on his emotional makeup.

Szczur to me seems like someone would would likely be able to deal with struggling at the major league level.

Vitters seems like someone who might have more trouble handling it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 04:45:52 pm
Quote
Does anyone else think the way he has the bat leaning forward may lengthen his swing?

Didn't hurt Gary Sheffield or Kevin Youkilis.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 14, 2012, 04:56:17 pm
Javier Baez article

Quote
"It's different here than what I faced in Arizona," Baez said. "Here, they throw more breaking balls and mix it up. It's not hard, but every time I sit on the fastball, but the pitchers mix it up a lot. I'm still learning the game. My goal is to keep learning and [to] try to do my best."

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120613&content_id=33265548&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb&tcid=tw_share (http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120613&content_id=33265548&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb&tcid=tw_share)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 09:38:13 pm
Baez: 1-2, HR, 2 RBI, K, E

Geiger: 1-4, 2B, 3 K, CS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_14_peoafx_belafx_1


The finish of Daytona's suspended game:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_13_dbcafa_breafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 09:58:48 pm
Jackson: 3-4, 3B, 2 RBI, SB, K

Vitters: 1-3, BB

Rizzo: DNP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_14_albaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on June 14, 2012, 10:21:56 pm
I gather that the scout's observations about Rizzo feasting on bad pitches are just impressionistic, and not based on data or analysis.  That said, it seems that one could go through his year and test the impression by evaluating statistically how he has done against "good" pitching, howsoever defined.  Opposing pitchers' stats?  Speed of pitches hit out?  Types of pitches?  Locations? etc. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 10:53:47 pm
Francescon: 5-2-0-0-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_14_breafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 14, 2012, 10:59:44 pm
Acosta: 1-5, HR, 3 RBI, BB, 3 K

Malave: 2-5, RBI, K

Torrez: 6-3-0-0-0-7   ( 16 IP, 0 BB, 14 K, 1 R )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_14_dchrok_dgirok_1



Sanchez: 4-4, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, BB, SB, CS, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_14_dwsrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 14, 2012, 11:04:25 pm
Not as much fun tonight, and not as much to report. 

Baez hit another home run, almost a repeat of last night.  Well over 400 feet, and just to the left of where he hit it yesterday.

Then he made an error in the field, but mostly looked pretty good there, including ranging to his left to catch a grounder behind second, stepping on the base and throwing to first.

Geiger hit one off the top of the CF wall, but then I think he struck out a couple of times.

Burke had a very rough start to the game, and then settled down to pitch decently.  He has a fastball that looked about as fast as Rosario's did yesterday, and a pretty good curve ball.  He walked a couple of guys, but generally had decent control.

Talked to the radio broadcaster after the game.  He is impressed with the starting pitching, consisting of Burke, Rosario, Wells (on the DL) Jensen and Concepcion.  He did say that Concepcion was throwing more fastballs than breaking pitches, but does not know if that has been affecting his game.  He really liked Francescon when he was here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 14, 2012, 11:05:37 pm
Tony Zych has 5 K's in his last two perfect innings.  For June, he's appeared five times, 6.1IP/9K/0BB/1H. 

30K/5BB/33IP/0HR

I wonder if he's getting better command of his slider or something, to start to strike people out.  He's been better than I'd appreciated.  And he's still 21 till late August, so i's not like he's a college fossil. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2012, 03:26:32 am
Quote
Coaches for the Cubs’ six minor league affiliates and two Dominican Summer League teams are keeping different hitting charts this season — chase charts, recording every ball a player has swung at out of the strike zone, situational hitting charts and game reports.

If a player swings at a pitch out of the strike zone in game situations, batting practice or even soft toss, it is recorded. The results are submitted to the big club in Chicago.

“I’ve got records of every bad pitch they’ve swung at since the start of spring training,” Buckner said.


http://www.idahopress.com/sports/localpro/hawks/new-look-for-hawks-hitters-this-season/article_43fb0710-b6ba-11e1-bcd6-0019bb2963f4.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 15, 2012, 06:24:21 am
Again, it is great to see the Cubs charting swings at pitches out of the strike zone, and urging players not to do so.... but why is it that this is an innovation in baseball?

Why wasn't this done decades ago?

And if Buckner and company are charting every swing OUT of the strike zone, why not also chart every swing IN the strike zone, as well as the results?

Hitters do not always know what pitches in the strike zone they should lay off, and some may not even really know what pitches and in what parts of the strike zone they hit best.

The charting is nice to see.  It would be even nicer to see it expanded.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 15, 2012, 07:32:50 am
I gather that the scout's observations about Rizzo feasting on bad pitches are just impressionistic, and not based on data or analysis.  That said, it seems that one could go through his year and test the impression by evaluating statistically how he has done against "good" pitching, howsoever defined.  Opposing pitchers' stats?  Speed of pitches hit out?  Types of pitches?  Locations? etc. 



I guess I'd be surprised if the anonymous scout has as much detailed analysis of how Rizzo is doing against various types of pitching   as the Cubs do, given their obsession with detailed information of all sorts. 

I'd also be surprised if any of us have as much undertstanding as they do of the extent to which Rizzo has holes in his swing at this point.  By all accounts, Theo/Jed/McLeod wanted Rizzo to work on specific things and he's supposedly made good progress in whatever areas those were.  It's possible that was just a smokescreen, but I doubt it. 

So, for now and sometime in the future, I'm going to trust the judgement of the Cubs new leadership a lot more than the judgement of either scouts or fans, however sophisticated they may be in their own right.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 15, 2012, 08:21:31 am
From the article Chris quoted, in reference to trying to teach hitters to be more selective:

“If they think it’s important enough for the major league hitting coach to get fired, I think at this level, I better make sure they swing at strikes,” Buckner said.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2012, 09:39:08 am
Boise Hawks' South African pitcher looking to make history for his country

Nice Tayler Scott story

(http://media.idahostatesman.com/smedia/2012/06/15/00/15/g5IoZ.AuSt.36.jpeg)

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/06/15/2155986/out-of-africa.html (http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/06/15/2155986/out-of-africa.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 15, 2012, 12:18:42 pm
TJ Surgery for Ben Wells. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 15, 2012, 12:40:13 pm
TJ Surgery for Ben Wells. 

Glad we drafted a lot of pitchers because our pitching on the farm is awful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 15, 2012, 12:47:43 pm
BTW doesn't Wells have some type of provision in his contract where he has to make the 40 man in a certain period of time?  I wonder how TJ surgery is going to affect that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 15, 2012, 12:52:21 pm
Here we go.  He has to go on the 40 man roster in 2013.  This will be an interesting situation to try to figure out.

Quote
But it also includes an unusual provision that guarantees that in 2013, Wells will be included on the Cubs’ 40-man roster. That means he’ll go to spring training with the Major League club that spring with a chance to make the 25-man roster.

http://www.bryantdaily.com/post/Bryants-Wells-signs-contract-with-Cubs.aspx (http://www.bryantdaily.com/post/Bryants-Wells-signs-contract-with-Cubs.aspx)

So I guess he goes on the 40 man after this year, but he also goes on the 60 day DL.  That means we won't have to burn an option year on him then, right?  (And also a sweet deal for Wells, since I guess he'll draw the major league minimum salary while he's on the 60 day DL and rehabbing?)

When he's finished rehabbing, we'll have three option years on him?  Think that'll be enough time for him to develop into a major league pitcher after TJ surgery?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 15, 2012, 12:55:16 pm
BTW what genius in the Hendry regime couldn't negotiate that provision out of the contract?  They couldn't have gotten this deal done without that provision?  Sheesh.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2012, 12:59:03 pm
When was the last time the Cubs had a legit pitching prospect make it through the minors without getting hurt? Zambrano?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 15, 2012, 01:03:15 pm
I'd also be surprised if any of us have as much undertstanding as they do of the extent to which Rizzo has holes in his swing at this point.

Again the "holes in his swing."

Just what do you mean by the phrase?  I am not asking you what "holes" might exist in Rizzo's swing, but simply what you mean by the phrase.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 15, 2012, 01:07:05 pm
When was the last time the Cubs had a legit pitching prospect make it through the minors without getting hurt? Zambrano?

Making it thru the minors without getting hurt is not always particularly meaningful.

Neither Wood nor Prior were ever hurt in the minors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 15, 2012, 01:07:14 pm
Actually I also wonder if there's a possibility the Theocracy might decide the cost of rehabbing him, paying him the major league minimum while on the major league 60 day DL, and then only having 3 option years after that to find out if he can be a major league pitcher isn't worth it.

Maybe they renegotiate the 40 man roster provision in his contract to get that taken out? (That would be helpful.)  Maybe they decide to flat out release him?  (Doubtful) 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 15, 2012, 01:11:29 pm
With Ben Wells, Szczur, Concepcion and Soler, the Cubs have burned four of there 40-man roster spots. They'll have some tough choices to make on their winter roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2012, 01:59:56 pm
Quote
Making it thru the minors without getting hurt is not always particularly meaningful.

Neither Wood nor Prior were ever hurt in the minors.


Wood actually had an elbow issue while at Daytona in '96, and Prior was in the minors for all of six weeks, but that isn't even relevant. You still don't want your prospects getting hurt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2012, 02:05:04 pm
Rizzo is 5th on BA's Hot Sheet this week:

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613557.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 15, 2012, 02:16:12 pm
Again the "holes in his swing."

Just what do you mean by the phrase?  I am not asking you what "holes" might exist in Rizzo's swing, but simply what you mean by the phrase.

"hole in the swing" is a phrase commonly used by scouts and other baseball people to describe the situation where a player can not hit a certain pitch in a certain location.  For instance, Choi could not consistantly hit a fastball on the inside part of the plate.  Others have substantial difficulties in a low outside pitch. 

On an imaginary (or with current technology, real) spread chart of the hitting zone, it would show up as a hole.  If you pitch to that zone, you are pitching through the "hole" in his swing.

This is different from the fact that, in general, players hit fastballs down the middle better than curves in the dirt.  It is specific to an individual and varies from individual to individual.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 15, 2012, 03:10:47 pm
"hole in the swing" is a phrase commonly used by scouts and other baseball people to describe the situation where a player can not hit a certain pitch in a certain location.

That is what I thought.... and by that definition EVERY hitter has a "hole" or "holes" (plural) in his swing, and that included Ted Williams.  The only question is how large the hole is, and how good a job the hitter does avoiding swinging at those pitches.  Considering what Rizzo is doing, it would appear that either his hole is relatively small, or that he does a pretty good job identifying which pitches he can't hit and avoiding them, or avoiding being put in situations where he might be forced to swing at them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2012, 03:23:31 pm
C Justin Marra, the Cubs 15th round pick in 2011, has been promoted from EXT to Boise.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 15, 2012, 03:24:39 pm
C Justin Marra, the Cubs 15th round pick in 2011, has been promoted from EXT to Boise.

Hopefully that's because he's earned it and not because they just need an extra body there. 

A 19 year old catcher making it to Boise on merit would be a nice development.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 15, 2012, 03:25:38 pm
That is what I thought.... and by that definition EVERY hitter has a "hole" or "holes" (plural) in his swing, and that included Ted Williams.  The only question is how large the hole is, and how good a job the hitter does avoiding swinging at those pitches.  Considering what Rizzo is doing, it would appear that either his hole is relatively small, or that he does a pretty good job identifying which pitches he can't hit and avoiding them, or avoiding being put in situations where he might be forced to swing at them.

I think it is safe to assume that professional baseball people realize that every single player has holes in his swing, and when they use it about a particular player, they mean that he has more holes or bigger holes than you would expect from someone with his stats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2012, 03:32:30 pm
Hopefully that's because he's earned it and not because they just need an extra body there. 

A 19 year old catcher making it to Boise on merit would be a nice development.
Welington Castillo just left Tennessee and Geo Soto should return from Iowa on Monday.  That could be causing a down-the-line chain reaction.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on June 15, 2012, 03:55:27 pm
What Dave said...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2012, 03:57:38 pm
Boise only had one catcher on its roster heading into its opener tonight. They had to call up somebody.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 15, 2012, 04:26:06 pm
Quote by Clevenger.

"You can only win a series by winning the first game".

If he is going to continue to hit well enough to get post game interviews, he will need to work on his interview skills.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 15, 2012, 04:35:59 pm
Dave, did you go to the Peoria game yesterday?  If so, how did Burke look? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 15, 2012, 04:48:55 pm
After the first inning, he looked pretty good.  I didn't have access to a gun, but he seemed to be about as fast as Rosario the previous night.  He also threw more breaking pitches with reasonable success.  He certainly was not as dominant as rosario had been the night before.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 15, 2012, 05:02:31 pm
Clevenger is right if the series is fewer than 3 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 15, 2012, 05:23:03 pm
No.  In a three game series, you can lose the first game and win the series by winning the next two. 

What he must have meant to say was that you can't SWEEP a series unless you win the first game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 15, 2012, 07:08:39 pm
Anthony Rizzo is back in the I-Cubs lineup against the Isotopes tonight.  The start of the game has been pushed back fifteen minutes due to weather and the postgame fireworks have been canceled.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 15, 2012, 07:15:20 pm
It's a shame that Rizzo is trying to play with a career-ending knee injury.  Poor, poor bastard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 15, 2012, 09:05:46 pm
In his first professional at bat, Dunston Jr. takes a walk.

Did his father teach him NOTHING?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 15, 2012, 09:09:12 pm
Dunston Jr. thrown out stealing.

I guess his father DID teach him a little bit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2012, 09:31:47 pm
Baez: 1-2, 2 BB

Geiger: 3-5, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_15_cliafx_peoafx_1


Lake: 2-5, 2 SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_15_biraax_tenaax_1


Daytona idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 15, 2012, 09:57:57 pm
It's nice to see real prospects showing some speed (Baez, Lake, Jackson, Sczcur).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 15, 2012, 10:35:57 pm
Baez is going to get to the big leagues a lot sooner than people think he is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 15, 2012, 10:38:17 pm
Baez is going to get to the big leagues a lot sooner than people think he is.

I know it's optimistic but one has to wonder if Baez might get to AA sometime next year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 15, 2012, 10:39:05 pm
I know it's optimistic but one has to wonder if Baez might get to AA sometime next year.

I wouldn't be surprised if he's there by May.  I certainly expect him to finish this season at Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 15, 2012, 10:41:20 pm
Rizzo: 1-3, BB, 2 K

Jackson: 0-3, BB, 3 K

Vitters: 0-4, 3 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_15_albaaa_iowaaa_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 16, 2012, 12:05:26 am
Brett Jackson continues his string of not having made an error yet this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 16, 2012, 12:14:06 am
Quote
Vitters: 0-4, 3 K

Looks like Vitters is in another dry spell.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2012, 12:46:27 am
Arias: 5-3-0-0-0-2

Dunston: 0-3, 2 BB, CS

Candelario: 1-5, 2B


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_15_boiasx_skvasx_1


Acosta: 1-4, K, E

Garcia: 3-4-4-3-0-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_15_boiasx_skvasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2012, 02:25:44 am
Sanchez: 2-4, RBI, CS, 2 E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_15_dcurok_dwsrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 16, 2012, 11:17:29 am
The Boise radio announcer, Mike Safford, is making what looks like some useful tweets

https://twitter.com/#!/BoiseHawksRadio (https://twitter.com/#!/BoiseHawksRadio)

Included in this morning's is a link to his blog which looks even better

http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/2012/06/16/its-a-76-game-season/ (http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/2012/06/16/its-a-76-game-season/)
Quote
FUNNY: Humorous moment of the night happened in both the 1st and 2nd innings – as after Shawon Dunston Jr. was caught stealing, bench coach Gary Van Tol, who was coaching at first ran off the field (thinking it was the 3rd out, when it was only the 2nd).  In the next inning, S-K first baseman Brian Nicholson rolled the ball back to the mound after a double play (though there were only two outs).  Both got a chuckle, and will probably get razzed by their respective Kangaroo Courts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 16, 2012, 12:07:02 pm
So Castro isn't absent minded.  He is just doing what he was taught.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 16, 2012, 06:27:33 pm
It's Sveum that's out of touch with the new Cub way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 16, 2012, 06:41:54 pm
Koyie Hill has cleared waivers and is now with Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 16, 2012, 07:01:55 pm
It's Sveum that's out of touch with the new Cub way.

You should tell Theo and Jed. I don't think they realize that.   ;)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 16, 2012, 07:16:58 pm
You should tell Theo and Jed. I don't think they realize that.   ;)

I think they might.

And that may be one of the reasons for the mid-season firing of Jaramillo, to try to drive home the point that folks need to either be on board with the "new way, or GET on board very quickly if they hope to stay around.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 16, 2012, 07:27:55 pm
You should tell Theo and Jed. I don't think they realize that.   ;)

I have, Ron, but for some reason, they don't listen!  Frustrating.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 16, 2012, 07:52:00 pm
Looks like Vitters is in another dry spell.

7 for his last 32.  BA of .219, OBP of .286, OPS .536.  His BA for the season has dropped more than 10 points from his high a short time ago.  Now at .265.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 16, 2012, 08:04:28 pm
Concepcion with one of his better outings, allowed only 5 runs in the first two innings.  His 1st-inning ERA must be around 30 or so.  A lot of lefties, you figure they'll maybe end up being relievers if they can't make it as starters.  His first-inning performance is so bad, that doesn't look that promising. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2012, 08:54:25 pm
Jokisch: 6 IP, 1 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_16_biraax_tenaax_1


Peoria suspended in the 4th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2012, 09:19:37 pm
FSL all-star game:


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_16_fseafa_fssafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Joto4Soto on June 16, 2012, 09:49:05 pm
Quote
7 for his last 32.  BA of .219, OBP of .286, OPS .536.  His BA for the season has dropped more than 10 points from his high a short time ago.  Now at .265.

he's 3-3 with a double so far today, back up to .274.   :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Joto4Soto on June 16, 2012, 09:53:56 pm
make that 4 for 4.  up to .277. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 16, 2012, 10:10:22 pm
Bananas Vitters seems really inconsistent, he's so hot-and-cold over a season.  But his overall season-by-season performances have been very consistent.  Pretty much always ends up as a .770-OPS guy.  .770 in 09, .770 last year, he's been waffling back and forth above and below .770 for the past several weeks.  Granted, 2010 he was only .717, but had some more injuries that year.

Will be intersting to see how Vitters plays out during the second half.  Just more of the same? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2012, 10:30:01 pm
Angel Guzman closed out the game against Iowa.


Rizzo: 1-4, 2B

Vitters: 4-4, 2B

Jackson: 1-4, 2B, RBI, 3 K  ( Last 37 AB's: 17 K's, 2 BB )


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_16_albaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 16, 2012, 11:50:02 pm
Shoulders: 1-4, HR, RBI, 2 K

Candelario: 0-3, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_16_boiasx_skvasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 16, 2012, 11:51:05 pm
I've always been a big fan of Angel Guzman. He's battled back through as many injuries as Wood or Prior, but he's made far less money.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2012, 12:35:08 am
Acosta: 1-4, 2 K   (26 K's in 51 AB's)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_16_dwarok_dchrok_1



Je Baez: 1-2, 3 BB, 3 SB, HBP, CS

Sanchez: 2-4, SB, K

Rodriguez: 5-2-1-1-3-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_16_dcurok_drdrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 17, 2012, 12:41:25 am
Quote
NOTES: The home run by Shoulders went a long, long, ways – over the right field wall and beyond a 35 foot high protective net, finding its way onto the heavily traveled Interstate 5.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 17, 2012, 07:43:43 am
...
Jackson: 1-4, 2B, RBI, 3 K  ( Last 37 AB's: 17 K's, 2 BB )
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_16_albaaa_iowaaa_1 (http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_16_albaaa_iowaaa_1)

June has been jackson's best month, with a .951 OPS. 

During June, he's whiffed 26 times in 59 AB, 44% of the AB. 

But the key is that he's 19-for-33 when he does hit the ball.  If he can hit .575 or close for the rest of his career on the AB's when he doesn't strike out, he's going to be really good.  Especially when you add in his non-statistical qualities.

I'm hoping.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 17, 2012, 07:44:24 am
Vitters OPS back up to .780. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 17, 2012, 08:28:25 am
If he can hit .575 or close for the rest of his career on the AB's when he doesn't strike out....

If he can hit .575 or close for the rest of his career on the AB's when he does not strike out, pigs will fly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2012, 10:31:47 am
Article on Boise's new hitting coach Bill Buckner:

http://www.idahopress.com/sports/localpro/hawks/hawks-hometown-hitting-coach/article_8c810c82-b84f-11e1-8792-0019bb2963f4.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2012, 11:34:01 am
They've now cancelled Peoria's suspended game from yesterday so Concepcion has another bad start erased. Also, Baez loses a double and a sac fly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2012, 03:54:15 pm
Rizzo: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, HBP, E

Vitters: 2-3, 2B, HBP

Jackson: 0-3, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_17_albaaa_iowaaa_1


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robert L on June 17, 2012, 04:25:35 pm
thanks Chris27 for all the updates
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 17, 2012, 04:27:36 pm
Rizzo appears to be slumping.

Only 1 HR today, and his batting average also fell.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 17, 2012, 05:15:23 pm
Rizzo now at 59 RBIs!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2012, 05:20:36 pm
Baez: 1-3, RBI, HBP

Geiger: 2-5, RBI, 2 K, E

Jensen: 6-6-2-2-0-3, 2 HB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_17_cliafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 17, 2012, 07:25:49 pm
Baez: 1-3, RBI, HBP

That's his 5th HBP, in 18 games.  Does he crowd the plate that much, does he work for the HBP, are teams throwing at him, or is it mere random chance in a small sample size?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2012, 07:59:39 pm
I don't know if he crowds the plate, but I can tell you that he was hit on the 9th pitch of the AB so it wasn't intentional.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2012, 08:00:41 pm
Lake: 3-4

McNutt: 5-2/3 -9-5-5-1-3, 3 HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_17_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 17, 2012, 08:49:10 pm
He was hit in one of the games I went to.  It was a soft curve that he literally moved his shoulder in to.  I don't remember his crowding the plate, but I was not specifically looking for that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 17, 2012, 08:50:49 pm
It's probably time for McNutt to be released.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 17, 2012, 09:00:11 pm
Absolutely.  That is no chance whatsoever that he can ever improve in the minors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 17, 2012, 09:02:45 pm
Of course he can, but if he reaches his potential, he MIGHT become Shawn Boskie.  Better to release him now so he can choose between a career selling insurance and putting a loaded revolver in his mouth.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 17, 2012, 09:22:58 pm
Shawn Boskie spent nine years in the majors leagues, should be drawing a major league pension for that, and earned more than $2.5M.

I suspect most of us on this list would eagerly jump at that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 17, 2012, 09:32:21 pm
Yes, as wannabe Cubs players.  Not so much as Cubs fans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 17, 2012, 10:00:25 pm
It's probably time for McNutt to be released.

Jeff, you can't just release your #1 pitching prospect like that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 17, 2012, 10:01:31 pm
Of course you can, if you're honest with yourself that he's total garbage.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 17, 2012, 10:10:30 pm
Dunston: 2-4

Amaya: 2-3, RBI, BB

Candelario: 2-4, 2 RBI, K

Scott: 5-3-0-0-2-4

Simpson: 2-1-2-2-3-1, WP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_17_boiasx_skvasx_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 17, 2012, 10:15:24 pm
Kind of interesting that Wilson Contreras is hitting cleanup in a lineup with quite a few of our more promising lower level prospects.  Sure would be nice to have a 20 year old catcher who can hit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 18, 2012, 09:49:22 am
This recap of the Boise Hawks game on Sunday

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120617&content_id=33490530&vkey=news_t480&fext=.jsp&sid=t480
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 18, 2012, 03:42:14 pm
Daytona has activated Matt Szczur from the DL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on June 18, 2012, 05:52:27 pm
What's the deal with Dylan Maples?  Is he hurt?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 18, 2012, 06:23:48 pm
Yes. For the last month or so, he's been expected back from a "minor" injury within a week or so. I suspect his arm fell off, and they're hoping it grows back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on June 18, 2012, 06:25:09 pm
I figured his arm probably fell off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 18, 2012, 08:41:40 pm
Whitenack: 3-5-4-4-3-2

Zych: 1-3-2-2-0-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_18_tbyafa_dbcafa_1


Iowa, Tenn, Peoria all off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 18, 2012, 08:58:45 pm
DSL:

*


Acosta: 3-5, 2B, 2 RBI, SB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_18_dchrok_dwarok_1


Paulino: 5-1/3 -2-1-1-1-6   ( 15 IP, 1 BB, 21 K, .172 BAA )


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_18_drdrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2012, 12:52:43 am
Shoulders: 0-3, 3 BB, 2 K

Candelario: 2-5, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_18_boiasx_skvasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 19, 2012, 12:39:16 pm
Boise Hawks promotional video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRsD3TKkkVk&list=HL1340111804&feature=mh_lolz (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRsD3TKkkVk&list=HL1340111804&feature=mh_lolz)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2012, 08:46:42 pm
Alcantara: 3-4, 2B, RBI, BB, SB, K, E

Szczur: DNP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_19_tbyafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 19, 2012, 09:15:04 pm
Burke gives up 5 in .2 inning of allstar game. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 19, 2012, 09:17:17 pm
Enderson Mercedes, outfielder on the DL1 Cubs, hit his 5th home run in the first 10 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 19, 2012, 09:33:15 pm
SS Bananas Emeterio got no hits in his pro debut.  But in his second game yesterday, he went 4/5 with two doubles, and then today 3/3 with a HR and a walk.

Already 19, though. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 19, 2012, 09:43:55 pm
Damb, he's old.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2012, 09:44:15 pm
MWL all-star game. Burke was torched:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_19_mdeafx_mdwafx_1



SL all-star game:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_19_sosaax_sonaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2012, 09:53:59 pm
Vitters: 1-5, HR, RBI, E

Jackson: 1-4, CS, BB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_19_iowaaa_rreaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2012, 09:59:43 pm
Acosta: 0-4, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_19_dchrok_dptrok_1


Emeterio: 3-3, 3B, HR, 3 RBI, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_19_drorok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 19, 2012, 11:28:14 pm
Cruz: 5-3-1-0-2-6

Shoulders: 0-2, 2 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_19_boiasx_skvasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 20, 2012, 12:18:18 am
Weird stuff - Szczur has been off the DL for two games, but hasn't played. Boise has four hitters batting exactly .250 after five games - Amaya, M. Hernandez, Candelario and Inoa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 20, 2012, 03:49:16 pm
The Boise Hawks have added C Lance Rymel, C Chadd Krist, IF Stephen Bruno, and P Joe Zeller to their roster. C Justin Marra goes to Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 20, 2012, 04:02:43 pm
Not sure where to put this, but since it relates to the minor leagues I'll put it here (maybe somewhere else as well): "Bill Murray: Baseball's Best Boss"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_561769&v=BNKh6QrRxoY&src_vid=Lz6Mt944yq4&feature=iv
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2012, 08:40:31 pm
Alcantara: 2-4, SB, E

Szczur: DNP

Francescon: 6-8-2-1-2-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_20_tbyafa_dbcafa_1


Tennessee and Peoria idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2012, 10:10:38 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 3 K  ( 4th 3-K game over last 7 )

Rizzo: 0-3, BB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_20_iowaaa_rreaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2012, 10:56:03 pm
DSL

.

Acosta: 0-4, 2 K

Torrez: 5-2/3 -7-2-2-1-5   ( 21 K's, 1 BB, 21-2/3 IP )


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_20_dptrok_dchrok_1



Mejias: 6-4-0-0-0-6   ( 17 K's, 1 BB, 24 IP )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_20_dcurok_drorok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 20, 2012, 11:44:36 pm
Candelario: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI

Dunston: 2-4, 2B, K



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_20_eugasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2012, 12:12:55 am
Vogelbach not in the lineup for Mesa's opener.

Rosscup: 1-2/3 -0-0-0-0-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_20_giarok_cubrok_1


Mesa roster:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_ros&cid=407
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 21, 2012, 08:24:23 am
Other than Penalver, there aren't a lot of unordinarily young Latin players on the roster.  Actually other than Penalver, the youngest players on the team are all draft picks.  That's kind of disappointing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 21, 2012, 11:17:01 am
JR, I think part of that is Theo and company are less aggresive than Hendry/Fleita in promoting young prospects. Also, Candelario and I believe a Dominican pitcher or two are at Boise, so Penalver isn't the only new face.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2012, 12:31:32 pm
Also, the DR Academy has a good reputation for teaching the basic fundamentals, which is something that Latino signees are often lacking.  I believe they are deliberately keeping more down there to have more control over their instruction, including that of English.  I wouldn't be surprised if they start to bring up Mulave, Encarnacion Mercado or a couple of others as the season advances.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2012, 12:34:23 pm
The system is so bad that the only Cub they could find to put on the Futures Game roster is Jae-Hoon Ha.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 21, 2012, 01:19:47 pm
This was BA's write up on Ha for the Futures Game, and I think it goes back to a little bit on that plate discipline discussion we had the other day.

Quote
The Scoop: Ha was a catcher when the Cubs signed him, but he has developed into one of the best defensive outfielders in the system. Ha still has to learn to walk a little more as he doesn't have enough power to profile as a slugging outfielder.

Ha averages right at 1 BB per 10 AB for this season, which is slightly better than the current major league average of  1 BB per 10.9 AB.

How are you going to demand a guy like this walk even more, when he doesn't have the kind of power or ability to get hits that pitchers will pitch away from?  Basically if you ask a player like this to take significantly more pitches, he's probably going to be taking a lot of strikes right down the middle. 

I think that's probably where some people aren't setting realistic expectations for a player's walk rate.  For the most part, a player needs to do something exceptional with the bat to be able to have an exceptional walk rate.  There are a handful of exceptions, but in the case of a guy like Ha, there's a good chance you're going to screw him up at the plate if you're asking him to walk more when he's already walking more than the average major leaguer.

A guy like this probably just isn't meant to be a .370 or .380 OBP player, unless he starts hitting for a higher average.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 21, 2012, 01:23:19 pm
Also in Ha's case, he's already walking much more this year than he has in his career.  His 1 in 10 AB rate this year is much better than his career 1 BB per 20 AB rate.

Maybe that's what BA is referring to when criticizing his walk rate.  I don't think there's a lot more you can expect to do in the walk department this year, unless he starts hitting for more average or more power to put some fear into the pitchers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2012, 04:12:41 pm
From a Cubs Den article about Ha.

Ha has turned into the Cubs best defensive outfielder, better than more highly regarded CF prospects Brett Jackson and Matt Szczur.  His athleticism and plus arm strength have allowed him to make more than his share of highlight worthy plays.

Cubs coach and defensive/baserunning guru Dave McKay was impressed with Ha this spring,

"I saw a guy who has a chance to be a great outfielder. He has great speed, a great feel on the bases. Sometimes you have guys who have speed and a lot of talent but they don't have that feel. The instincts aren't there and the harder they try, the more mistakes they make. [Ha] has got good instincts."

"After spending a short time with him, I thought, 'Here's a guy you're going to see a lot of down the road.'
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 21, 2012, 04:15:31 pm
That's interesting.  I take McKay's opinion pretty darned seriously.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 21, 2012, 04:49:52 pm
Cubs coach and defensive/baserunning guru Dave McKay was impressed with Ha this spring,

"I saw a guy who has a chance to be a great outfielder. He has great speed, a great feel on the bases.

Wait, isn't this the same guy that's well under 50% in stolen bases?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 21, 2012, 04:57:17 pm
I've heard too that Ha is a really good outfielder, and that his combination of getting good jump, good route, and being able to catch what he can reach is excellent.  And he's got a really strong arm, plus it appears to be accurate.  Maybe fairly quick get-off as wel?  (Andrew Dawson had a superb arm, but late in his career it sometimes seemed to take him a whole bunch of hops and steps to load it up and fire....) 

I suspect that McKay's comments were focused on the defensive aspects, since he's the outfielding coach and not the hitting coach or baserunning coach. 

Or else perhaps there is some hyperbole involved.  I'm guessing either he doesn't quite have "great" speed or else he doesn't "great" baserunning instincts, at least as regards the base-stealing domain of baserunning, given that he was 13SB/17CS last year, and he doesn't even try often this year (5SB/3CS).  Baserunning on doubles and triples and 1st-to-3rd is a different game from stealing bases, though, and there are guys who just can't start fast for base-stealing because they just don't have the knack for reading a pitcher, but are very good baserunners otherwise. 

It would be really cool if Ha would develop into a useful hitter. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2012, 05:19:45 pm
Not sure how much Ben Badler is speculating, but it's interesting to read anyway.


Quote
Cubs third baseman Jeimer Candelario was born in New York. Had he stayed in the United States, there's a good chance he would have been a first-round pick earlier this month.

Instead, Candelario moved to the Dominican Republic and signed with the Cubs two years ago for $500,000, which is already looking like a potential bargain. After crushing the ball in the Dominican Summer League last year, Candelario, 18, has skipped the Rookie-level Arizona League and jumped to short-season Boise, where he hit his first home run of the year yesterday in a 2-for-4 evening, bringing him to .292/.320/.458 through his first six games.

Candelario is a switch-hitter with a mature approach to hitting and power from both sides of the plate. He has work to do to remain at third base, but the Cubs have a potential breakout prospect on their hands here.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/06/cubs-jeimer-candelario-hits-first-home-run-in-boise/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 21, 2012, 06:15:12 pm
Just FWIW, Kevin Goldstein had Candelario ranked 7th on his Cubs list this past offseason, between Vitters and McNutt.

Quote
7. Jeimer Candelario, 3B
DOB: 11/24/93
Height/Weight: 6-1/180
Bats/Throws: S/R
Drafted/Signed: Dominican Republic, 2010
2011 Stats: .337/.443/.478 in Dominican Summer League (72 G)
Tools Profile: Candelario has a fantastic combination of pure hitting ability and offensive polish.

Year in Review: This Dominican signee was among the most impressive players in the Dominican Summer League in terms of both numbers and scouting reports.
The Good: Candelario has significant offensive potential. He earns raves for his highly-polished approach, and is a switch-hitter with power potential to all fields and a knack for consistent hard contact. He's a solid runner with the tools to become an average first baseman.
The Bad: Candelario's swing works much better from the left side; his power is reduced greatly with his contact-based swing against lefties. He's still messy defensively, and there are worries that he could be forced to first base or left field should he fill out and slow down.
Ephemera: Candelario was 16 days old when id Software released Doom, the groundbreaking first-person shooter.
Perfect World Projection: He could be a middle-of-the-order run producer.
Fantasy Impact: He hasn’t played a game in the United States, so let's calm down a bit here.
Path to the Big Leagues: Candelario will likely spend the spring adjusting to playing in the United States, then play in a short-season league. His upside is tremendous, but he's eons away.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 21, 2012, 06:17:25 pm
Candelario is a switch-hitter with a mature approach to hitting and power from both sides of the plate. He has work to do to remain at third base, but the Cubs have a potential breakout prospect on their hands here.

Though I have not given up on Vitters yet, I have to admit I would not be surprised to see Candelario make it thru the minors and establish himself at thirdbase before Vitters can.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2012, 06:29:58 pm
There is more to base running than just stealing bases.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 21, 2012, 06:55:51 pm
Kyler Burke has been promoted to Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2012, 07:22:23 pm
DSL-


Acosta: 2-5, 2B, SB, 2 K

Malave: 2-5, 2B, 3 RBI

Garcia: 2-1-0-0-0-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_21_dphrok_dchrok_1


Sanchez: 0-4, K

Emeterio: 1-4, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_21_dcurok_dtwrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on June 21, 2012, 07:44:42 pm
About time re: Burke...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 21, 2012, 08:45:29 pm
Kyler Burke has been promoted to Daytona.

Good.  Considering his age, he needs some of that (quick, mid-season promotion, his 2nd this year) to have much of a shot as a pitcher in the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2012, 09:16:33 pm
He is a minor league free agent at the end of the year if they do not add him to the 40 man roster.  I assume they want to push him to see if he is worth it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2012, 09:20:20 pm
Candelario with another home run tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2012, 09:33:35 pm
Lake: 4-5, 2B, SB, K, E

Struck: 6-2-1-1-2-7


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_21_tenaax_jaxaax_1


Szczur: DNP

Kirk: 7-4-0-0-2-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_21_dbcafa_clrafa_1



Chiefs off.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 21, 2012, 09:57:02 pm
Apparently Brett Jackson is in RF tonight, with Sappelt in CF.  I assume this is a new thing. Anybody care to speculate on why?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2012, 10:09:19 pm
Jackson: 1-4, 2B, 2 K

Vitters: 1-4, HR, RBI, K, E

Rizzo: 0-4   (4 for last 24)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_21_iowaaa_rreaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 21, 2012, 10:16:24 pm
Rizzo: 0-4   (4 for last 24)

According to NSBB, Rizzo was robbed of a homer in one AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 21, 2012, 10:47:45 pm
Looks like Rebel Riding went back down to Daytona and Nelson Perez up to Tennessee. Funny how Perez was an onbase (plus, of course, strike out) machine at Daytona. Isn't he a guy with a plus-plus throwing arm?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2012, 10:49:07 pm
He has a very strong throwing arm.  When I saw him in Peoria, he was also accurate.  He also has plus power.  His major problem is failing to make enough contact.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 21, 2012, 11:13:03 pm
Candelario: 3-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB

Shoulders: 1-2, RBI, 3 BB, K, E   (walk off single)

Amaya: 2-5, 3B, K

Simpson: 4-1-1-0-1-7


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_21_eugasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 21, 2012, 11:26:41 pm
Apparently Brett Jackson is in RF tonight, with Sappelt in CF.  I assume this is a new thing. Anybody care to speculate on why?

Not sure how current its data is, but baseball reference has Jackson with CF-55, RF-7, LF-5. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 21, 2012, 11:32:06 pm
Candelario: 3-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB
..
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_21_eugasx_boiasx_1

Candelario was taken out for a pinch runner, Brian Inoa, in the 9th, after going 1st to 3rd on a single, tie game. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 21, 2012, 11:46:42 pm
Simpson: 4-1-1-0-1-7

Simpson is a prospect again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 22, 2012, 12:03:27 am
Brett Jackson's next K will be #100 this season.

Move over Adam Dunn.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 22, 2012, 12:07:36 am
An oddity that probably is a fluke:  Vitters is batting .333 at home and .227 on the road but 10 of his 11 homers were hit on the road. Go figure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 22, 2012, 12:46:56 am
Brett Jackson's next K will be #100 this season.

Move over Adam Dunn.

The Adam Dunn with the .923 OPS?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2012, 01:00:55 am
Vogelbach must be hurt.


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_21_cubrok_athrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2012, 01:32:31 am
Couple Hawks video highlights including Candelario's oppo homer:

http://www.kboi2.com/sports/Boise-Hawks-Eugene-Emeralds-Northwest-League-159965435.html?tab=video&c=y
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 22, 2012, 06:25:25 am
I don't think JR will accept his prospect status even if his next outing is a complete game no-hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 22, 2012, 07:04:12 am
Vitters is due for a slump.  OPS up to .805.  Any time for the past several years that he's pushed up much past .770, it's usually been time for a dip.  What goes up, must come down....

The Jackson/Dunn analogy is fun, of course, but Jackson doesn't have anywhere close to the contact skills that Dunn showed back in the minors, does he?  Doesn't Jackson K much more, and particularly swing-and-miss way more than Dunn did in minors? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 22, 2012, 07:47:17 am
The Adam Dunn with the .923 OPS?

Brett Jackson is now at .809 OPS at Iowa, with his OBP down to .333, and his BA is .257. He's no Adam Dunn in the power department either, being 15 HRs behind Rizzo at this point.  I can only think of one person here who is for sure a bigger fan of Jackson's than I am, but even I am beginning to worry about him a little. I didn't expect him to have any problems at Iowa this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on June 22, 2012, 08:13:03 am
Even though he's a Cub, Ron?  :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 22, 2012, 08:28:47 am
Looks like Rebel Riding went back down to Daytona and Nelson Perez up to Tennessee. Funny how Perez was an onbase (plus, of course, strike out) machine at Daytona. Isn't he a guy with a plus-plus throwing arm?

Quote from: Bleacher Nation
Yesterday’s news that Rebel Ridling had been demoted to Daytona was a surprise to many of us, but I think there may be an explanation that makes some sense of it. Rebel Ridling is primarily a first baseman, and as a first baseman he put up some good numbers with Tennessee last season. He was due for a promotion to Iowa until the Cubs traded for Anthony Rizzo. Rather than let Rizzo block the progression of all first baseman in the system, the Cubs chose to double up on first basemen in Double A by promoting Justin Bour to play first while Ridling spent more time in the outfield. The result was a marked decline in Ridling’s production. The answer? Ridling goes to Daytona where he is able to once again play first on a daily basis while he gets his bat going again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 22, 2012, 08:59:47 am
There is no analogy between Dunn and Jackson. The reference to Dunn is that Jackson is about to reach 100 Ks and Dunn is the only big leaguer close to 100 Ks (109 and counting). Lighten up, guys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 22, 2012, 09:09:51 am
It's just hard for a guy to sustain good numbers when he's striking out in 33% of his plate appearances.  I mean, Jackson has to get on base in half of his non-strikeout PAs to even be a decent OBP guy. 

It'll be interesting to see what happens with Jackson over the next month or two.  If he doesn't improve soon, his value is going to drop.  It seems like the Cubs are almost to a point where they either have to fully commit to him (and accept that he may end up being a complete bust) or decide to trade him for someone else they have more confidence in as a long term asset.  I wouldn't be that surprised to see him traded at the deadline...maybe with Dempster or Garza to get a better package back, or in a non-traditional deal where the bad team "buys" at the deadline (like when the Cubs traded Scott Downs for Rondell White when they were really bad in 2000).  Waiting until the offseason to decide whether or not they believe in Jackson may be too late.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 22, 2012, 09:56:55 am
LHP Zach Rosscup and RHP Su-Min Jung from Daytona are now on rehab assignments in Boise.


 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 22, 2012, 09:59:24 am
Jackson has 516 PA at AAA level. His line is 273-356-507, with 58 x-base hits out of 123 total hits.  This is not the kind of guy you should throw-in in some kind of Dempster trade deadline deal, seems to me.

He has 163 Ks in those PAs.  That is not good.  But, you just have to see what happens with him given the other pluses.

Tigers CF Austin Jackson struck out 351 times in his first two big league seasons, but he has cut down this season and is doing very well overall.

Have a little patience.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 22, 2012, 10:27:20 am
I'm not saying I'm giving up on Jackson.  And when I mention adding him to a Garza or Dempster trade, I'm not thinking in terms of making him just a "throw-in".  He'd be a significant part that substantially increases what the Cubs get back. 

Many times during the Hendry/MacPhail era, the Cubs had good prospects that they wouldn't commit to.  And they'd also refuse to trade them until all they could get was someone like Aaron Heilman.  I want to see this front office be more decisive and proactive.  Do they think he's the centerfielder of the future?  Fine, then commit to him and ensure he plays everyday at some point soon.  Do they think he'll never overcome his K rate?  Fine, then trade him while he's still viewed as a top 100 prospect by everyone.  But don't do the in between thing where he plays sporadically until the Cubs discard him for a marginal reliever.

By the way, if Brett Jackson had the same number of PAs in the majors as Austin Jackson had in his first two years, he'd strike out 440 times...if he maintained his current K rate.  But since MLB pitching is better than AAA pitching, there's a good chance his K rate would increase a little.  Guys like Russell Branyan, Rob Deer, and Mark Reynolds are better comparisons.  But they all have/had elite power to overcome their strikeout rates...and even then, they weren't all that good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 22, 2012, 10:44:45 am
If the WORST case scenario for Jackson is mark Reynolds or Rob Deer----but with speed,  good CF defense, and 45 per cent x-tra base hits as a lefty bat---that's a pretty good player. 

As to Jackson in a Dempster deal---Jackson would be the centerpiece of such a deal, so I don't understand the timing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 22, 2012, 11:08:12 am
Mark Reynolds wouldn't be an everyday player if he didn't have elite power, and he might not even be in the majors.  He'd be hitting about .215 and wouldn't collect nearly as many walks because no one would be scared to just go after him.  Same with Rob Deer.  Power is the one and only reason guys like them have major league careers...and Jackson just doesn't have that kind of power.  Jackson is a second division starter at the very best if he doesn't reduce his K rate by several percentage points...and he'd probably be a complete bust, because no one with Jackson's combination of non-elite tools has ever had a long, productive career in the major leagues with a 30%+ strikeout rate. 

And I say that as someone who really likes players who have a wide base of above-average-but-not-elite tools and patience at the plate.  I love Jackson's ceiling...If he could get his strikeout rate down to a reasonable level, I think he'd be an underrated star in the mold of Bobby Abreu (in his prime, of course)--not just the above average regular he's always been projected to be. 

But guys with 30%+ strikeout rates just don't succeed very often.  And with a full year in AAA now with no signs of improvement, I'm not sure how much longer we can realistically expect him to improve as much as he needs to in that area.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on June 22, 2012, 11:58:37 am
Mike Cameron made a pretty good career out of being a CFer with a little pop and a K rate around 30%...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 22, 2012, 12:18:21 pm
Jae-Hoon Ha story by Carrie Muskat

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120621&content_id=33690414&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 22, 2012, 12:20:49 pm
Those guys are your comps, not mine.  But, in any case, HRs are not the whole story when it comes to power.  Jackson has 29 triples in the last 2 1/2 seasons, including 9 already this season.  And, he has a very, very high percentage of x-tra base hits of his overall hits.  He is not your typical 20 homer guy, given all the combined triples and doubles.  Substitute 10 triples for the 10 homers as to Deer/Reynolds---and give them speed, good CF defense, base running, and turn them into a lefty bat--- that's your worst case case scenario?

Look, we do not know how Theo is evaluating Jackson. Maybe he thinks that the Ks will doom him or maybe he is crazy about Scuzur instead and maybe some other organization likes him more than Theo does.  Fine, trade him for that terrific player. But, the notion--if that's the argument-- that Jackson is about to turn into mush is misguided, as I see it.  He has plenty of traits that look like a very solid regular, with a red flag that is not necessarily a career ruin at this stage of his development.  I'm guessing not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2012, 12:24:08 pm
I think the Brett Jackson debate comes down the prevailing opinion of some on this board that if a prospect is not going to be a super star, then he is going to be terrible.

I doubt that Jackson will ever be a superstar.  But with excellent center field defense, a fairly high stole base percentage and an OPS hovering about 800, he would be a pretty valuable asset to most teams, including the Cubs.  Especially since he seems to have more power than most center fielders.

If we can trade him for someone with more value, of course we should do it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 22, 2012, 12:25:33 pm
Austin Jackson is a nice comp, I think.  But as br notes, we do these Jackson comps with Austin Jackson, Dunn, Deer, etc..  Often the comparison is between Jackson's minor-league K-rate and the major-league K-rates of these guys.  But if you look at Austin Jackson, he might've been K'ing in the AL like Jackson is K'ing in the PCL.  But in the minors, his K-rate was way lower, not even close to our Jackson's K-rate.  Similar for Dunn, I think. 

I'm open to trading anybody, if you get better value back.  But I'm kind of inclined to think that everybody else probably sees the same Brett Jackson that we do.  A guy with some qualities, but with a substantial risk that he just can't hit pitches often enough to make it work.  Having a broad base of tools is wonderful, but if you have one problem, having that be the contact-tool is kind of a killer.  So I guess I question whether his trade value is enough to be worth trading him for. 

Although certainly smarter posters than me like reb, Ron, deeg, and Sveum are big fans, so maybe there are GM's out there who are big believers and you could make a good move.  Or maybe there's somebody who scouts him and thinks they see a correctible flaw, and that they'll be able to fix him with a new batting coach or something. 

But I'm inclined to do neither of the things that you suggest, br.  Neither trade nor commit.  Heh, I'm a Hendry guy, this is the earn-it business.  With reb, I think you just have patience and ride it out.  Maybe he'll get better and we'll be glad we kept him.  Maybe he's a very intelligent young man who has already figured out how to be as good as he can get, and he's already reached his ceiling as a hitter and it's never going to get much better.  I don't know, lets just wait and see.  I don't think his trade value is high enough to be much worth trading and losing the chance that maybe he'll end up pretty good.  But I don't think it makes any sense to "commit" to a player who may not be good enough right now and who may never get much better. 

deeg has a fair point, too, that if all you care about is current performance, maybe Jackson will never be more than a .650-.725 OPS guy, which isn't much to get excited about.  But Campana is a .623 OPS guy.  So even if Jackson is a .650 guy, that might still be perceived as an anti-awful upgrade offensively, and a definite upgrade defensively.  It's not an illogical possibility.


But I'd like to just ride it out and wait and see.  Let him play in the minors, and see if he can improve himself.  If he could develop, that would be a good thing.  I don't think that bringing him up to swing-and-miss at big-league movement/speed is necessarily best for his development at this point.  Just let him work at things in Iowa and see if he can improve somewhat. 


But I'd sure like to see more HR's.  Sure, cut down on the K's if you can.  But that might be harder than just hitting more HR's, which could justify more K's. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 22, 2012, 12:28:20 pm
Heh, question.  Earlier there was discussion about Rizzo's "hole".  If a guy has a chart, and the graph shows that there is an area where he swings and misses or doesn't hit effectively that constitutes a hole, relative to the chart. 

If you chart Jackson and he's theoretically got swing-and-miss all over the chart, does that mean he has no hole?  Or would that mean that the whole strike zone is a hole? 

In other words, is a "hole" relative to your own production?  Or is it relative to league-normal? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2012, 12:32:16 pm
In other words, is a "hole" relative to your own production?  Or is it relative to league-normal? 

Yes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2012, 12:40:06 pm
From BA's "Man Among Boys" section of the Hot Sheet:


Quote
• Hayden Simpson, rhp, Cubs: Any progress is encouraging progress for Simpson, and Thursday night he pitched four innings for short-season Boise, giving up just one unearned run and one hit while walking one. More importantly, he tied a career high with seven strikeouts. Boise manager Mark Johnson told the Idaho Press-Tribune that Simpson pitched great. "I can't picture him throwing any better," the skipper said. No one envisioned that the 23-year-old 2010 first-round pick would still be in short-season ball two years after being drafted, but of course few teams besides the Cubs pictured Simpson as a first-round pick that year. Simpson has endured mono and arm injuries since being a surprise first-rounder, and one game doesn't make his slow progress any easier to stomach for Cubs fans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2012, 12:45:09 pm
Don't give us that crap.  He had a good game.  He is now a prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 22, 2012, 01:00:43 pm
The Boise Hawks play-by-play guy, Mike Safford, was asked  "Would love to hear what Simpson's velocity is."  His reply:  We don't have a speed gun at the stadium, my guess 87-89, good CB
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 22, 2012, 01:50:11 pm
Building the farm DEPTH is incredibly important to long-term success...as DaveP and others who've followed minor league baseball for decades point out regularly here, some guys the "experts" agree will make it won't...and some guys no one considers to have a chance (e.g. LaHair) will.

There's almost no way to know which guys will keep improving (as they must to be successful at the MLB level). 

What smart teams DO know is that the QUANTITY of potential impact players must be HIGH, so that there's a hedge against the risk that some top prospects hit their ceilings in the minors.  That's why (with today's draft rules) international signings are key and development is key and trades (for a team as Cubs) are key.

Who knows about BJax' future?   I'm just really glad he's in our system...he's an asset, particularly in that he adds depth to our list of potential impact players.   I'll continue to hope he has a breakthrough and improves...a lot!

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 22, 2012, 01:52:38 pm
Mike Cameron made a pretty good career out of being a CFer with a little pop and a K rate around 30%...

Yeah...if you consider 24% to be "around" 30%. 

There is a HUGE difference between a 24% strikeout rate and the 33% that Jackson currently has.  I would expect Jackson to be a multi-time All Star if he could keep his strikeout rate that low.  In 600 PAs, the difference between 24% and 33% is 54 strikeouts.  If Jackson only struck out 24% of the time and posted a .400 OBP in the hypothetical non-K PAs (which is a pretty low estimate--Mike Cameron got on base about 43% of the time in his non-K PAs in the majors), that would result in an extra 21-22 times on base over 600 PA, or a 36 point difference in his overall OBP.  If you cut 36 points off of Mike Cameron's career OBP, he's essentially Rick Ankiel.

He is not your typical 20 homer guy, given all the combined triples and doubles.  Substitute 10 triples for the 10 homers as to Deer/Reynolds---and give them speed, good CF defense, base running, and turn them into a lefty bat--- that's your worst case case scenario?

You're confusing my "worst case scenario" with my "best case scenario".  Worst case scenario would be turning into a AAAA player like most guys with 30% strikeout rates.  Guys like Reynolds and Deer are the outliers who have gotten by because they're able to hit for an exceptionally high batting average on balls not in play (at least for someone who strikes out as much as they do).  Jackson's 10-15 non-HR a year wouldn't all turn into doubles and triples.  Most would turn into fly outs.  A few would turn into doubles and triples.  Maybe a single here and there too.  But he wouldn't hit 1.000 on those balls in play in those ABs.  And perhaps more importantly, he wouldn't walk nearly as much as those guys because pitchers wouldn't be afraid to throw balls in the strike zone.

Bottom line for me...in the history of major league baseball, 2,074 players have accumulated 2,500 plate appearances.  Out of those 2,074 players, only 7 have a strikeout rate of at least 30%.  Two of those (Jake Stahl and Nixey Callahan) finished their career in 1913 when baseball was a very different game, so they're not really that relevant in evaluating Jackson. 

The others over 30%?  Mark Reynolds (33.1%), Russell Branyan (32.9%), Bo Jackson (32.0%), Jack Cust (31.7%), and Rob Deer (31.2%).  What do all those guys have in common?  They're all sluggers with elite home run power and a bunch of below average tools (well, Bo Jackson had some other tools before his hip injury...but later in his career, he was just a slugger and nothing else).  They all pick(ed) up a bunch of extra bases and scare(d) pitchers enough that they rarely see pitches in the zone.  No where on that list do you see an all-around good player without any elite tools.  That says to me that only sluggers with huge power have better than a marginal chance of succeeding with strikeout rates that high.

Now just because no one has ever done it doesn't mean Jackson can't do it...but it does indicate that it is probably unlikely.  Jackson's not doomed yet, and he still has time to improve.  But without an improvement, it will probably ruin his career
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 22, 2012, 02:10:52 pm
I think the Brett Jackson debate comes down the prevailing opinion of some on this board that if a prospect is not going to be a super star, then he is going to be terrible.

That's not it at all.  Welington Castillo will never be a star, but he's certainly not going to be terrible.  I think Rizzo is probably more of a Derrek Lee type (outside his outlier career year) than a Votto or Adrian Gonzalez...and I'll gladly take that--again, clearly not terrible.  But Jackson's strikeout rate is just so far out of line with what other successful players have that it's going to have to improve.  Just my opinion, and I think it's backed up by stats and history. 

On the other side, I think some people get so enamored with pretty good Cubs prospects that they're able to overlook huge, potential career killing red flags.  Since only 7 players in history (5 in modern history) have had substantial careers with 30%+ strikeout rates, I don't think it's being overly pessimistic to have some huge concerns about Jackson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2012, 02:19:36 pm
Quote
Welington Castillo will never be a star, but he's certainly not going to be terrible.


After watching Castillo play lately I have my doubts that he's going to be able to hit ML pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 22, 2012, 02:46:26 pm

After watching Castillo play lately I have my doubts that he's going to be able to hit ML pitching.

How can you tell that from two games he's played in June?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2012, 03:28:14 pm
I don't dispute that Jackson will not be a decent player if he strikes out in the majors at a 33% rate.  However, I am not comfortable with the implied assumption that he WILL strike out in the majors at a 33% rate.

He might improve.  He might not.  In the meantime, as Ben said, I am glad we have him, and wish we had another dozen like him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 22, 2012, 04:33:55 pm
You're confusing my "worst case scenario" with my "best case scenario".  Worst case scenario would be turning into a AAAA player like most guys with 30% strikeout rates.  Guys like Reynolds and Deer are the outliers who have gotten by because they're able to hit for an exceptionally high batting average on balls not in play (at least for someone who strikes out as much as they do).  Jackson's 10-15 non-HR a year wouldn't all turn into doubles and triples.  Most would turn into fly outs.  A few would turn into doubles and triples.  Maybe a single here and there too.  But he wouldn't hit 1.000 on those balls in play in those ABs.  And perhaps more importantly, he wouldn't walk nearly as much as those guys because pitchers wouldn't be afraid to throw balls in the strike zone.

First, your "best case scenario" assumes 200 Ks per season.  That's why you came up with the Deers, Reynolds, etc.  Beats me how that is a best case scenario for Jackson.  It isn't. 

Second, you are using BABIP in a manner that is misplaced.   The "control over" balls in play or, more appropriately, the lack of control is mostly about pitchers, not hitters.  Lots of hitters "overperform" the typical generic BABIP.  Along with the speed guys, the guys who tend to do that are extra-base guys--which Jackson certainly is.  His iso power # at the AAA level is .234.  Deer's career MLB iso power # was .222. Reynolds is .242.   

Take the Rob Deer example more closely..  Deer averaged 2 triples and 21 doubles per 600 PAs, along with his 32 HRs.  But, Jackson is hitting a ton of combined triples and doubles.  He may well average 10 more doubles and 10 more triples than Deer ( 31 doubles and 12 triples).  That is 50 total bases over and above Deer in non-HR extra base hits, which is equivalent to about 12 homers. It's not just homers.

 And, of course, all of the above assumes 200 Ks--which I do not consider a best case scenario for Jackson.

What we do not know---because we haven't eyeballed Jackson much or at al---is why is he striking out so much? 

If he has a non-correctable hole (s) or lacks bat speed or doesn't pick up spin on a breaking ball, you can see big trouble ahead.  But, from the solid walks and the excellent BABIP, I'm guessing that he is a very stubborn hitter who goes deep into counts and is typically looking for the "perfect" pitch to drive.  )Kind of a contra-Vitters in the bizarro world).  As a result, Jackson almost certainly is getting into tons of two-strike situations. If you looked at the numbers I posted recently about two-strike situations---virtually everyone not named Tony Gwynn sucks sucks in two-strike situations.  Is that correctable?  Depends on why Jackson is getting into all those two-strike situations.  So, I am anxious to see him.

If it's not a hole(s) or bat speed or the like, it would seem that Jackson has a decent chance to get his Ks down below the dreaded 200 K level--toward the 25% range.  I have no idea what's in store. But, seems really premature to be talking about trading him now or assuming that it's a given that he's going to strike out 200 times.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 22, 2012, 05:04:20 pm
It'll be interesting to see what happens with Jackson over the next month or two.  If he doesn't improve soon, his value is going continue to drop.

I fixed that one mistake for you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 22, 2012, 05:18:38 pm
...
What we do not know---because we haven't eyeballed Jackson much or at al---is why is he striking out so much? 

If he has a non-correctable hole (s) or lacks bat speed or doesn't pick up spin on a breaking ball, you can see big trouble ahead.  But, from the solid walks and the excellent BABIP, I'm guessing that he is a very stubborn hitter who goes deep into counts and is typically looking for the "perfect" pitch to drive.  )Kind of a contra-Vitters in the bizarro world).  As a result, Jackson almost certainly is getting into tons of two-strike situations. If you looked at the numbers I posted recently about two-strike situations---virtually everyone not named Tony Gwynn sucks sucks in two-strike situations.  Is that correctable?  Depends on why Jackson is getting into all those two-strike situations.  So, I am anxious to see him.....

I agree that the question is very much a scouting question of why he strikes out so much.  I don't know, and I assume the Cubs track some information that would be relevant. 

Several hypothetical explanations:
1.  He takes too many strikes.  Highly selective, which explains the high walks and production on BIP.  This is correctible at the major league level to some extent.  Although the walk-production and XBH production might go down if he adapts by swinging at more pitches that he currently lets go. 
2.  He swings and misses at too many strikes.  Holes, spin, bat speed, vision, pitch recognition, whatever.  Those tend to be God-given talents, and if he's deficient now it's not going to change much. 
3.  Mechanical flaws.  Some swing mechanics can be adjusted.  And early on there was suggestion that he had some flaws.  Given that he's been a consistent whiffer and it's getting worse if anything, though, makes it improbably that a correctible mechanical flaw is involved.  Jackson is a very smart young man who's very invested in his baseball production, and he's had lots of coaches.   

I will admit that I sometimes skim what some of the posters at nsbb write.  Many of those guys watch or track a lot of the Iowa games.  According to several of them, it hasn't been a case of Jackson being too patient and taking too many pitches.  By several accounts, it's just that he swings and misses a ton.  That his contact-per-swing ratio is exceptionally low.  Again, this is third hand, but their perspective is that he's routinely K'ing on AB's where he swings-and-misses three times, not infrequently on short 4-pitch AB's.  I expect that McLeod has swing-and-miss statistics, both in terms of count situations (is it only a problem with 2 strikes?)   

I admit that my current concern is that the main reason he strikes out so much is that he swings through a lot of pitches, not because he takes too many strikes.  If so, that doesn't bode well for the majors. 

4.  Guess hitter.  When he gets what he's guessing, he hits it well; when he doesn't he takes a lot or misses a lot.  But when he gets to 2-strikes, you can't guess-hit so well.  So then he's swinging at a lot of pitches and missing a lot, whether strikes with spin or sliders well outside of the zone. 

We'll wait and see.  We have no other choice anyway.  I hope he gets better.  My hope with any prospects that strike out a lot (he does) but have power (he does) is that they hit enough HR's to help justify the K's and to keep the batting average afloat.  200K's/14HR's is one think, 200K's/25HR is another.  And if it was 180K's/30HR's, we wouldn't be worried about this. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 22, 2012, 05:51:59 pm
If it's not a hole(s) or bat speed or the like, it would seem that Jackson has a decent chance to get his Ks down below the dreaded 200 K level--toward the 25% range.  I have no idea what's in store. But, seems really premature to be talking about trading him now or assuming that it's a given that he's going to strike out 200 times.   

It's just that brjones is always trying to dream up one trade or another.  I think maybe "Trader Jack" was his boyhood idol.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 22, 2012, 05:55:04 pm
Daytona lineup

1. Matt Szczur - DH
2. Arismendy Alcantara - SS
3. John Andreoli - RF
4. Greg Rohan - 1B
5. Rebel Ridling - LF
6. Micah Gibbs - C
7. Rubi Silva - CF
8. Taylor Davis - 3B
9. Roni Torreyes - 2B
SP- LHP Frank Del Valle
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on June 22, 2012, 06:19:55 pm
Cubs den had an interesting articlevon Jackson's K rate.  They compaired him to Jim Edmounds in the minors.  Edmounds had a slightly lower slugging percentage than Jackson in the minors and a similar K rate overall at 25%.  When Edmounds jumped from AA-AAA his rate jumped to 27%.  What does it mean, nothing.  Another blog said somebody who watched the team often stated that Jackson would foul of pitches and then get a lot of swinging strike 3's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 22, 2012, 07:06:38 pm
9  Jackson 
6  Amezaga 
3  Rizzo 
4  Dewitt 
5  Vitters 
7  Wright 
8  Sappelt 
DH Lalli 
2  Apodaca 

1  Rusin 


By definition, shouldn't your DH be higher in the lineup than eighth?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 22, 2012, 07:12:10 pm
DelValle perfect game through 5, with 10 K's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2012, 08:20:25 pm
Szczur: 1-3, 2 BB

Del Valle: 6-0-0-0-0-11

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_22_dbcafa_clrafa_1


Rhee: 7  IP, 2 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_22_tenaax_jaxaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 22, 2012, 08:29:25 pm
Many times during the Hendry/MacPhail era, the Cubs had good prospects that they wouldn't commit to.  And they'd also refuse to trade them until all they could get was someone like Aaron Heilman.  I want to see this front office be more decisive and proactive.  Do they think he's the centerfielder of the future?  Fine, then commit to him and ensure he plays everyday at some point soon.  Do they think he'll never overcome his K rate?  Fine, then trade him while he's still viewed as a top 100 prospect by everyone.  But don't do the in between thing where he plays sporadically until the Cubs discard him for a marginal reliever.

That is why I believe there is a very good chance next year's Cubs will lose even more than this year.  By next year the Cubs should be giving very regular playing time to Jackson, and perhaps a couple of others, to see whether they are likely long term solutions, or to see whether the team needs to go an entirely different direction.  That will involve some real growing pains.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2012, 08:47:58 pm
On the subject of whether or not players can meaningfully learn to increase their walks - Ceasar has as many walks this year in about 190 at bats than he had all last year in almost 450 at bats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 22, 2012, 09:17:09 pm
I thought DelValle was perfect, given no hits no walks.  But he did hit two guys. 

Szczur has definitely made an adjustment to walk more.  Some guys can. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2012, 09:22:20 pm
Candelario with another home run.  three for the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2012, 09:27:01 pm
Brett Jackson with a home run tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2012, 09:36:46 pm
Baez: 1-4, SB, 3 K

Geiger: 1-3, 2B, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_22_qcsafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2012, 09:42:55 pm
Vogelbach sighting.  Single in his first at bat.

If he continues to hit 1000 for his career, he should do well, especially if he shows the promised power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2012, 10:22:53 pm
Rizzo: 3-5, 2B, 3B, 3 RBI, K

Vitters: 3-4, 2B

Jackson: 1-4, HR, RBI, 2 BB, 2 K



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_22_iowaaa_rreaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 22, 2012, 10:24:27 pm
Time to bring up Vitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2012, 10:24:50 pm
DSL

*

Rodriguez: 6-3-2-1-1-7

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_22_dtwrok_dcurok_1


Pieters: 2-1/3 -5-3-3-5-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_22_dchrok_dphrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 22, 2012, 10:31:18 pm
Vitters is 11/20 with 2 HR over his last five games.  He's added around 60 OPS points or so in the process.  I'm think he should be up or over .820 now.  So some margin on both .800 and his traditional .770. 

All hitters have ups and downs, and Vitters has been very much an off-and-on guy. Good hitters have the ability to extend their ups and limit the extent of their slumps.  Perhaps he's making some progress in those areas. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 22, 2012, 10:36:05 pm
Lake has been noted for his growth and size and his power potential.  He showed power in AFL, and started with some his first week active.  In June he's got 16 singles and 1 each for double/triple/HR.  And 3 walks. 

I've always kind of figured that his was a question of HR's.  He's going to strike out quite often.  But if he hits a goodly amount of HR's, could become pretty good. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 22, 2012, 11:14:21 pm
Amaya: 4-4, 2 RBI, 2 SB

Candelario: 1-4, HR, 3 RBI, 2 K

Shoulders: 0-2, 2 BB, 2 K, E    (10 BB, 11 K's  in 21 AB's)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_22_eugasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 23, 2012, 12:17:03 am
The Boise game had an eight minute wind delay.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2012, 12:35:05 am
Vogelbach: 2-4, 2B, K

Marra: 3-4, 2B


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_22_diarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 23, 2012, 12:48:16 am
It is easy to tell the difference between the difficulty of the various leagues.  When playing in Boise, Justin was held to a .600 batting average.  When brought down to Mesa, his batting average soared to .750.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2012, 05:00:16 am
Quote
Boise hitting coach Bill Buckner said Candelario is not only the team’s youngest player, but “he’s been the best. That’s a good combination.”

“He’s shown some surprising power. I see him down the road having power. I don’t think his body’s totally matured yet.”

....

Candelario said he set his sights on making the Hawks’ roster this season and wants to make another leap to the Cubs’ High-A team in Daytona, Fla., next year.


“He was ready, he deserved to be here,” Buckner said. “There’s no set age limit, if you can play, you can play. He’s definitely the (Hawks’) best third baseman at this level.”

In the first inning Friday, Candelario followed leadoff singles by Amaya and Marco Hernandez with a towering shot over the right-field fence to give Boise a 3-0 lead.

....

Batting right-handed on Wednesday, the 6-foot-1, 180-pound switch-hitter hit a long home run to left field in a 7-4 loss to Eugene. He hit an opposite-field home run from the left side of the plate in Thursday’s 5-4 win.

“That’s showing some power that’s there,” Buckner said.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2012, 05:06:01 am
Hawks video including another J-Can homer:

http://www.kboi2.com/sports/Boise-Hawks-Eugene-Emeralds-Northwest-League-160099665.html?tab=video&c=y


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2012, 05:09:31 am
Rosario pitched pretty well last night but was even better than his line indicated.

Quote
Quad Cities scored two runs in the eighth behind a pair of bad breaks. With one out Neal Pritchard hit a ball that Javier Baez cut off but slipped in trying to plant his foot to throw, and the shortstop still almost threw out Pritchard.

Quad Cities shortstop Matt Williams lofted a fly ball to center that Pin Chieh-Chen lost in the lights and turned into a triple. Instead of being out of the inning, Quad Cities tied the game at 3 and still threatened.

....

“I told him he pitched his butt off,” Chiefs manager Casey Kopitzke said. “Throw the results out the window, and I thought it was probably his best pitching performance of the year. Unfortunately he came out on the wrong end of the stick.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on June 23, 2012, 07:34:02 am
I would also look into bringing up Vitters.

What can it hurt?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 23, 2012, 09:51:32 am
I like to move guys up the ladder but I would leave Vitters at Iowa all season. He can still be here for 25 games in September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 23, 2012, 10:47:55 am
People here have been referring to Cubs Den lately.  He has a mid-season rating of Cubs position prospects, taking into account the draft and signing of Soler.  It's a pretty interesting list, more so than any Cubs list I've seen in a long time. I will say that I was surprised to see Castillo at #6. So far Clevenger has outperformed Castillo, and I wouldn't expect to see Clevenger on the list at all. What am I missing (besides Castillo's better power)?

1. Anthony Rizzo: AAA, 1B, 22
2. Javier Baez: Low A, 3B, 19
3. Jorge Soler: Has not played, RF, 20
4. Albert Almora: unsigned, CF, 18
5. Brett Jackson, AAA, CF, 23
6. Welington Castillo, AAA, C, 25
7. Jeimer Candelario, Short-Season A, 3B, 18
8. Junior Lake, AA, SS, 22
9. Matt Szczur, High A, CF, 22
10. Josh Vitters, AAA, 3B, 22
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 23, 2012, 11:07:17 am
Good list---but all position players. Guessing that no other organization in MLB would have a top 10 list with zero pitchers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 23, 2012, 11:16:17 am
It was a list of the top position players in the system.  The list of pitchers will come later.

It still might be that none would have made the overall list, but at this time, we don't know.

I assume that Clevenger is not eligible for the list because he is on the ML team.

One other thing of note.  In his opinion, three players, Baez, Soler and Almora have a higher ceiling than Rizzo.

For those who don't read the article.

Tool Box Summary:  (Focus is on players in my top 40 list)

Best Hitter: Javier Baez, with Jeimer Candelario close behind.

Best Power: Anthony Rizzo has the most consistent power, but Javier Baez can launch them too.  Jorge Soler also looms.

Fastest runner: Matt Szczur is utilizing his raw speed better. DeVoss isn't far behind.

Best defensive infielder: Marco Hernandez.  Baez could be a plus defender at 3B

Best defensive catcher: Cubs have plenty, but Welington Castillo's arm is a difference maker.

Best defensive outfielder: Jae Hoon-Ha.  Albert Almora could challenge him once he signs.

Best infield arm: Junior Lake.  That is all.  To mention a runner up would imply that someone is actually close.

Best outfield arm: Jorge Soler.  Almora will have a plus arm from CF.  Ha may have the best among those actually playing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 23, 2012, 11:21:36 am
Thanks for the clarification.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 23, 2012, 11:30:32 am
Clevenger hasn't lost his rookie status yet, has he?  He doesn't have enough PAs yet, but he may have been on the roster long enough.  Still, if he hasn't lost his rookie status, I would expect him to be eligible for the list (but not necessarily on the list).

Regardless, has Clevenger really outperformed Castillo?  Defensively, I guess (although Castillo does seem to have a cannon arm--if he can improve his receiving a little, he could be a real plus back there).  But offensively, Clevenger has hit .253/.271/.349 this year.  Castillo hit .206/.270/.353 in his short time at the major league level (37 PA), essentially identical performance.  But he is absolutely destroying minor league pitching (.317/.476/.571 between AA and AAA)...he's probably too good to be down there at this point.

Law and Goldstein both have said they like Castillo as a future average regular, while they see Clevenger as a backup.  If I'm not mistaken, Goldstein has hinted that he thinks Castillo is a little more than an average regular.  I don't have a BA subscription, so I don't know what they say...but they did have Castillo in their top 10 this past offseason.  I don't think anything that has happened this year would've changed their perception of the two of them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 23, 2012, 11:48:46 am
I would be really cautious with Vitters. 
1.  We know he's had issues with plate discipline and pitch recognition.  Statistically it's still a problem this year, but there are some indications that he has made some efforts and progress, even if limited and even if not obvious in his walk rate.  But I'd like to see him stay put and try to solidify those small-step gains, or make further steps in that area.  When you're OPS'ing at .800, you can afford to try some things and perhaps lose an AB here or there.  But when he's in the majors, he's not going to be focusing on finesse developmental issues like that, he's just going to be struggling to stay afloat.
2.  He hasn't been a quick-adjustment guy at any of the levels.  So i think that it would be smart to wait extra-long, rather than to promote him prematurely as has been his deal at previous steps. 
3.  There is still a lot of incomplete development left for him.  Power-wise, pitch-selection, defense, baserunning.  The farm is intended for development.  I think that might be a good place for him to continue to mature, with less attention and pressure for when he does goof up.  Yes, guys can improve and develop in the majors too, and perhaps the coaching is even better there too, and there are probably things you can't master in Iowa.  But I think there are a host of complicating pressures in the majors that can distract from development or focus on particular issues.
4.  Vitters isn't noted for his emotional maturity, brains, or articulation.  The pressure and media attention and likely struggle/failure in the majors might not be something that he handles especially well.  I think he might be a guy where you want to make especially sure that he's as ready baseball-wise as possible, so that the initial struggle and failure won't be  unnecessarily intense.  If there's ever a guy who should be overqualified as a hitter before coming up, he might be that guy. 
5.  The Cubs aren't going to win anything this year.  A 50-point OPS boost at 3rd won't really get us into the playoffs. 
6.  He's on a hot streak right now, but he's gone hot and cold every year.  Part of learning as a hitter is figuring out how to ride the highs and lows, and to extend the good and shorten the bad.  He's got plenty of learning left to do at Iowa.
7.  He's only 22.  There is no rush. 

My feeling is to let him finish out this season at Iowa, and see how it goes, and especially keep drilling on the defense and pitch selection issues.  Try to do a Camp Colvin this winter to add some more strength for power.  Send him back to Iowa again next spring, and hopefully next summer he's 2013 Rizzo, putting up excellent numbers and seeming to be overqualified for a callup.  Nothing wrong with some wishful thinking, is there? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 23, 2012, 11:55:03 am
Clevenger hasn't lost his rookie status yet, has he?  He doesn't have enough PAs yet, but he may have been on the roster long enough.  Still, if he hasn't lost his rookie status, I would expect him to be eligible for the list (but not necessarily on the list).

Regardless, has Clevenger really outperformed Castillo?  Defensively, I guess (although Castillo does seem to have a cannon arm--if he can improve his receiving a little, he could be a real plus back there).  But offensively, Clevenger has hit .253/.271/.349 this year.  Castillo hit .206/.270/.353 in his short time at the major league level (37 PA), essentially identical performance.  But he is absolutely destroying minor league pitching (.317/.476/.571 between AA and AAA)...he's probably too good to be down there at this point.

Law and Goldstein both have said they like Castillo as a future average regular, while they see Clevenger as a backup.  If I'm not mistaken, Goldstein has hinted that he thinks Castillo is a little more than an average regular.  I don't have a BA subscription, so I don't know what they say...but they did have Castillo in their top 10 this past offseason.  I don't think anything that has happened this year would've changed their perception of the two of them.

Castillo has a rocket and has HR power, and is a year younger.  Easier to look at his age and AAA numbers and see more long-term potential there, higher ceiling. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 23, 2012, 12:13:49 pm
I like to move guys up the ladder but I would leave Vitters at Iowa all season. He can still be here for 25 games in September.

Agreed
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 23, 2012, 12:22:00 pm
I'd leave him there all year this year and start him there next year. June call-up is the earliest I'd consider promoting him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 23, 2012, 12:24:07 pm
Good list---but all position players. Guessing that no other organization in MLB would have a top 10 list with zero pitchers.
It was a list of the top position players in the system.  The list of pitchers will come later.

I'm not sure we have any pitchers I'd rate ahead of those hitters, though. Maybe depending on how Pierce Johnson and Dillon Maples are looking right now.

I wouldn't rate any of our pitchers who are currently active and pitching ahead of any those hitters, put it that way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 23, 2012, 12:29:06 pm
I'm not sure we have any pitchers I'd rate ahead of those hitters, though. Maybe depending on how Pierce Johnson and Dillon Maples are looking right now.

I wouldn't rate any of our pitchers who are currently active and pitching ahead of any those hitters, put it that way.

So, I take it that you don't believe Simpson has regained prospect status?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on June 23, 2012, 12:55:04 pm
I don't want to see Vitters in the majors until next September, at the earliest.  The guy has a .328 obp in the PCL and you want him in the majors now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 23, 2012, 01:03:52 pm
Clevenger has not lost his rookie status.  But it does not sound unreasonable to me that when an amateur is making a list of better minor league prospects, that he could forget about someone not in the minor league system, even though he is technically a veteran.  Either way, Clevenger hasn't made many lists throughout his career, and could quite possible not made that one either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 23, 2012, 01:17:31 pm
No way Cleavenger makes that list, eligible or not.  He's not an elite prospect by any stretch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 23, 2012, 01:21:03 pm

  The guy has a .328 obp in the PCL and you want him in the majors now?

Now at .337
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 23, 2012, 01:21:51 pm
So, I take it that you don't believe Simpson has regained prospect status?

Uh, not quite.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 23, 2012, 02:42:22 pm
Now at .337

Heh heh, a funny thing:

Jackson OBP:  .337
Vitters OBP:  .337
Jackson slugging:  .483
Vitters slugging:  .484

Pretty fluky to have such equivalent offensive stats. 
While being such very, very different kinds of players/hitters. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 23, 2012, 02:52:50 pm
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=595591

Rafael Diplan has allowed 2 hits and has 10 K's in his 9 Boise innings thus far.  I believe he had some of Az Phil's best pitching stats.  Two years ago in his pro debut, he had a 1.49 ERA in 42 DSL innings, then last summer he pitched only 14 innings. 

Anybody know anything else about him?  Was he good in DSL and at Boise and this spring because he's got something, or just a guy with no stuff that projects?  That's he's pitching relief might suggest that he's just a guy.  But that he pitched only 14 innings last year might also fit with their being some injury issues, so maybe if he was good pre-injury and post-injury last summer means nothing? 

He's 20, only 6'1", and he could be 35 based on his picture.  So probably nobody significant.  But I always enjoy some of the surprise relief successes.

Dillon Maples supposedly had a little something to deal with in camp in March.  Late in May he supposedly thought he was about fine to start throwing.  Now it's end of June and he's on the disabled list.  I wonder if he'll pitch this summer?  And if he'll ever get 25 innings in before he has surgery or something?  He's 20 already, so for a wild young prospect, he's not really all that super young. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 23, 2012, 03:52:00 pm
Great post re Vitters, Craig!  Well said!
Don't rush ANY of them!
It's certainly NOT about our MLB team this year!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 23, 2012, 04:50:33 pm
I would also look into bringing up Vitters.

What can it hurt?

What can bringing up Vitters hurt?

How about Vitters?

Let's have him dominate at AAA before bringing him up, and perhaps learn all that he can learn there.  Vitters has stuggled badly with each promotion.  Doing that at Wrigley for a prolonged period could kill his development and his career.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 23, 2012, 05:15:45 pm
I don't want to see Vitters in the majors until next September, at the earliest.  The guy has a .328 obp in the PCL and you want him in the majors now?

I'm not sure jiggs is convinced yet that OBP is very important.

If Vitters is doing well at the end of his minor league season, a September call-up this year might make sense, even if he only gets a couple of AB and innings of play.  Just seeing what is involved at the major league level might help him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2012, 05:19:24 pm
Am I the only one who thinks Castillo's bat looks slow and "hole-ish"? He just seems like a 4-A player to me.

Then again, I thought Soto was going to be terrific, and he has had 2-1/2 really good years but he's an enormous enigma overall.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 23, 2012, 07:51:39 pm
Whitenack with a good game so far.  5 innings, 3 hits, 0 runs, 0 walks, 3 strikeouts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 23, 2012, 07:54:03 pm
Brett Jackson with a home run and a single so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 23, 2012, 07:54:33 pm
Chris, "4A" catchers can be longtime major leaguers.  The standard is so, so low.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: nobull on June 23, 2012, 09:18:43 pm
Chris, "4A" catchers can be longtime major leaguers.  The standard is so, so low.
Hill says hi
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 23, 2012, 09:31:21 pm
Of course, Koyie Hill is more like a 2A catcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2012, 09:34:43 pm
Szczur: 1-3, SB, BB, 2 K

Whitenack: 5-3-0-0-0-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_23_dbcafa_clrafa_1


Baez: 0-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_23_qcsafx_peoafx_1


Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_23_tenaax_jaxaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2012, 09:58:47 pm


Jackson: 2-5, HR, RBI, 3 K   -  K'd by Neal Cotts to end the game as the tying run

Rizzo: 0-4, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_23_rreaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 23, 2012, 11:04:51 pm
Candelario: 1-3, BB, K

Dunston: 1-4, 2B, SB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_23_eugasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on June 24, 2012, 12:01:19 am
I like our group of position prospects tremedously.

Our pitching leaves a whole lot to be desired though.

Hopefully we get all these pitchers we drafted signed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2012, 12:39:35 am
Vogelbach: 2-6, 2 2B, 4 RBI

Saunders: 6-6, 3 RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_23_cubrok_royrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2012, 01:45:54 am
Paulino: 5-1-1-1-0-5   - Opposing hitters 11-76 (.145), 26 K's, 1 BB

Emeterio: 2-5, 2B, 2 RBI

Sanchez: 2-4, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, 2 E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_23_dcurok_dparok_1


Acosta: 1-4, 2B, RBI, 2 K, E

Araujo: 6-4-1-0-1-7 


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_23_dacrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 24, 2012, 11:46:49 am
Am I the only one who thinks Castillo's bat looks slow and "hole-ish"? He just seems like a 4-A player to me.

No, you're not.

Granted, I haven't seen him much but when I've seen him, I didn't think he was too impressive.

Now, that may be because he was losing playing time to Koyie Hill, and perhaps he needs consistent playing time in order to be comfortable.  Who knows?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 24, 2012, 03:22:20 pm
Cubs prefer Clevenger's defense over Castillo's defense. That's why Clevenger is up, not Castillo.

From my perspective, Castillo is much more appealing offensively---he has homer power, has slugged .500 at Iowa, and Clevenger has almost no homer power.

I think that Clevenger is strictly a #2 catcher whereas Castillo is a potential # 1 guy. Tip of the cap to those who have diagnosed Castillo's offensive holes based on 71 PAs. FWIW Castillo has a better MLB OPS than Clevenger in his brief stints.

Brenly has pointed this out several times: Castillo is terrible at framing pitches.  Needs work.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2012, 04:14:04 pm
Quote
Tip of the cap to those who have diagnosed Castillo's offensive holes based on 71 PAs.


A bit too snarky towards those(me) who have said he appears to have a holey swing based on the eye test. I don't think anyone claimed it was set in stone that Castillo somehow sucks now and forevermore.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 24, 2012, 04:25:58 pm

A bit too snarky towards those(me) who have said he appears to have a holey swing based on the eye test. I don't think anyone claimed it was set in stone that Castillo somehow sucks now and forevermore.

You're right. My bad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2012, 04:31:01 pm
Jackson: 1-3, HR, RBI, SB, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_24_rreaaa_iowaaa_1



Tennessee suspended in the 3rd.

Daytona rained out.

DSL teams and Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 24, 2012, 04:51:29 pm
Rizzo is already falling apart at the prospect of being called up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2012, 06:04:28 pm
Geiger: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI, K

Baez: 1-5, K    -  3 for last 16

Jensen: 4 IP, 7 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_24_qcsafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on June 24, 2012, 08:19:36 pm
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_24_qcsafx_peoafx_1
[/quote]
Rizzo is already falling apart at the prospect of being called up.

I'm beginning to doubt that "up" is the most apt preposition.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 24, 2012, 08:35:57 pm
Good point.  Rizzo is probably PO'd at the prospect of being demoted.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 24, 2012, 08:39:30 pm
1st inning HR's for Candelerio and Marco Hernandez.  Both hitting lefty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 24, 2012, 08:58:38 pm
And Dunston homers in the 2nd. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 24, 2012, 09:18:41 pm
I like our group of position prospects tremedously.

This group of Cubs position player prospects is one of the best in decades.  Unfortunately, compared to MLB average, it's still way, way below average.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 24, 2012, 09:20:17 pm
B. Jackson's line is now 260-342-502. 

One-half of his hits are extra-base hits (36/72).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 24, 2012, 09:27:43 pm
So, assuming that Castro will stay at SS (more and more likely), 3B pool is Baez, Vitters, Lake, and Candalario.

From this group of four, who is better suited (if any) to a move to 2B? Thoughts?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 24, 2012, 09:40:46 pm
None of them are defensively qualified to play second base.

Baez will be a RF candidate when Soler fails.

One of Baez, Vitters, and Candelario will play 3B.

Lake is nothing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 24, 2012, 09:46:06 pm
2018 lineup:

LF Jackson
CF Szczur
RF Baez
3B Vitters
SS Castro
2B Barney
1B Rizzo
C Castillo-Clevenger

Perennial 100+ loss team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 24, 2012, 09:46:16 pm
Why is Lake nothing?  He's 22 years old and is putting up solid numbers at AA. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 24, 2012, 09:47:25 pm
...22 years old and is putting up solid numbers at AA. 

Like thousands of other pud pullers throughout MLB history.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 24, 2012, 09:48:33 pm
So, assuming that Castro will stay at SS (more and more likely), 3B pool is Baez, Vitters, Lake, and Candalario.

From this group of four, who is better suited (if any) to a move to 2B? Thoughts?

I don't think there's a second baseman in that group.  Vitters and Candalario can barely handle third base themselves.  The projection for Candalario is that he'll eventually have to move to 1B, so I definitely wouldn't view him as a future possibility for 2B.

Baez might could handle second, especially since it sounds like he has more athletic ability at short than we thought, but that might seem doubtul as well.  If they're comparing him athletically to Gary Sheffield, it's tough imaging any point in Sheffield's career where he could have been a second baseman. 

Lake, like Jeff says, just seems like an obvious corner outfielder down the road.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 24, 2012, 09:51:48 pm
So, assuming that Castro will stay at SS (more and more likely), 3B pool is Baez, Vitters, Lake, and Candalario.

From this group of four, who is better suited (if any) to a move to 2B? Thoughts?

Baez is most likely able to move to second.  I doubt if any of the others are.  Lake would probably be best suited for right field
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 24, 2012, 09:52:04 pm
Is Lake just unable to pick up a ground ball?  Otherwise, I don't understand why he doesn't project as a second or third baseman.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 24, 2012, 09:54:33 pm
Candalario can barely handle third base themselves.  The projection for Candalario is that he'll eventually have to move to 1B

You must have information that I haven't heard.  Everything I have seen indicated that Candelario is a good fielding third baseman.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2012, 10:06:35 pm
I've seen things similar to what JR has.


Quote
He has work to do to remain at third base, but the Cubs have a potential breakout prospect on their hands here.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/06/cubs-jeimer-candelario-hits-first-home-run-in-boise/


Quote
He's still messy defensively, and there are worries that he could be forced to first base or left field should he fill out and slow down.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=15574


Quote
Right now, Jeimer Candelario is a very poor defender at 3B, and he is going to have to improve a LOT to stay there. Otherwise 1B or corner OF would be in his future.


AzPhil in the comments.

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/03/21/maholm-throws-five-innings-fitch-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 24, 2012, 10:11:21 pm
Here's what BA said in the Prospect Handbook:

"Candelario has thick legs and below average speed, and he'll have to watch his conditioning.  He has the hands and arm strength to play third base, though some scouts wonder if he'll slow down enough and necessitate a move to first base."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 24, 2012, 11:22:55 pm
Amaya: 2-4, 3B, HR, 2 RBI, BB, K

Dunston: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI

Candelario: 2-5, HR, RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_24_eugasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 01:25:06 am
Pretty interesting piece on Dunston and his father:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/06/24/2166558/following-dads-footsteps.html#wgt=rcntnews
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 04:15:19 am
Boise manager Mark Johnson on Gioskar Amaya:

Quote
“He always seems to put together good at-bats,” Johnson said. “He’s a grinder, (he) grinds through every single at-bat and has a really good sense of the strike zone.

“He’s got a really nice makeup. He’s a tough kid that always wants to learn, works hard and he’s one of those kids that you want a team full of.”


http://www.idahopress.com/sports/amaya-joins-hawks-power-performance-in---victory-over/article_0884b476-be92-11e1-aabd-0019bb2963f4.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 25, 2012, 08:31:13 am
Nice to see a power-day output from Amaya. The grinding good-AB and great attitude is great. But it's a lot easier to make it as a good-attitude/grinder/contact hitter with at least a little power besides.  Would be fun to see him emerge as a legit guy where he doesn't have an absolute lack of power.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 25, 2012, 08:56:24 am
Round Rock visits Des Moines for a day game today.  Anthony Rizzo is in the Iowa lineup.

The Sun-Times may be on the right track when they speculate that going up against Johan Santana tonight might not be the way to start him out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 25, 2012, 09:00:56 am
All the highlights of Boise's win over Eugene on Sunday, including the four homers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP4Gqa2CQcs&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP4Gqa2CQcs&feature=youtu.be)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 25, 2012, 09:09:10 am
Lengthy piece on Hayden Simpson

Quote
Simpson was alerted that he may be a top choice by Chicago, but was told to keep the good news to himself. Unfortunately for the 23-year-old right hander, the urge to boast was too difficult to resist.

“We knew, but we tried to downplay it a little bit, because we didn't want people to think it was some kind of deal with the Cubs,” said Simpson following pregame practice. “Maybe I overplayed it a little bit, and I came to find out I did. But it always comes as a surprise when it actually works out that way.”

http://cubs.scout.com/2/1197571.html (http://cubs.scout.com/2/1197571.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 25, 2012, 09:13:23 am
Quote
With a pitcher as young, and raw as Simpson, the timetable for a big league appearance is always different, but with the reinforcement of fundamentals and the development of a professional mentality, Simpson will have no problem doing what he does best: shock the world.

Still plenty of Kool-Aid going around at CubStalk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 25, 2012, 01:00:42 pm
Vitters has an RBI single and a "moonshot" HR for Iowa.

Anthony Rizzo replaced by Blake Lalli in the fourth after going 0-2 with a K.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 03:15:16 pm
Thanks for the Boise highlights, Cactus. Was looking for them.


A few observations from those and previous ones:


Candelario and Dunston both have really nice swings, at least from that behind-the-plate view. Candelario's is very unusual for a left-hander in that he keep both hands on the bat and raps it behind him on the follow through. A lefty version of Baez.

That is one interesting way to pronounce Gioskar Amaya's name: Hee-a-scar
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 25, 2012, 03:16:46 pm
How do you pronounce his first name?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 03:22:47 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 2 K

Vitters: 2-3, HR, 2 RBI, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_25_rreaaa_iowaaa_1



Lake: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI, K

Jokisch: 5-2/3 IP, 10 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_24_tenaax_jaxaax_1



Rhoderick: 2/3 IP, 5 R   - 10 R last 3-1/3 IP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_25_tenaax_jaxaax_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 25, 2012, 04:12:12 pm
Cubs Den reporting that Rizzo is heading to Chicago:
http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/06/anthony-rizzo-on-his-way-to-chicago/

of course, in his last 10 games or so he's been in a pretty bad slump....but, still, if true it will provide a reason to watch some Cubs' games again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 25, 2012, 04:22:33 pm
It's pretty standard Cub policy to only call up guys who are in a slump.  They always do it that way, it seems.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 04:25:50 pm
Quote
It's pretty standard Cub policy to only call up guys who are in a slump.


Don't want a hot player coming up and embarrassing his teammates.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 25, 2012, 04:38:50 pm
For finesse control pitches, it seems they can be very effective, but if they don't have it they can be pretty bad.  Jokisch had been on a remarkable stretch of effectiveness, but then a really dreadful line. 

Raley with another effective game, he's been really good for most of his recent starts.  In the middle of a bunch of 7-inning, 18K/2BB/0HR starts, was a 5.1IP/2K/2BB/8 earned runs start. 

He's never commanded a lot of buzz since he never actually seemed to add any of the velocity that they projected for him.  But suddenly here he is in AAA at age 23 throwing 7-inning starts with 1 run, 0 runs, and 0 runs this month.  I wonder if he's got any potential?  When he's sharp, he seems to be fairly decent. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 05:11:51 pm
Daytona GM 1:


Alcantara: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_25_dbcafa_sluafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 25, 2012, 05:26:49 pm
http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/06/a-different-perspective-on-mlb-ready-prospects-rizzo-jackson-castillo-lake-and-vitters/

Very interesting statistics on Rizzo, Castillo, Vitters, Jackson, and Lake.  Not sure where they are getting the data or if it's actually accurate, but it lists their statistics on:
P/PA (Pitches per plate appearance)
Contact Rate
O-Swing% (percentage of swings taken outside the strike zone)
O-Con% (contact rate outside the strike zone)

Most of the results aren't very surprising, but some is.  Jackson is very high P/PA, and Vitters isn't.  Jackson has a really low contact rate.  Jackson and Lake swing a lot outside-of-strike zone, and have horrible contact rates when they do. 

Castillo shows up pretty well, his P/PA is good, his contact rate is good, and his contact rate outside the strike zone is also good.  May be fluky small-sample, though. 

Most surprising, at least initially, is that Vitters has by far the lowest O-Swing% (percentage of swings taken outside the strike zone).  He's 7.8%, the others are all over 11%. 

His reputation has been as an undisciplined hacker who swings at everything.  These numbers suggest that he is FAR less likely to swing outside the strike zone than Jackson or Rizzo.  So perhaps the conclusion is that he's much more selective and disciplined than we realized, at least this year. 

Perhaps a different explanation that reb might prefer is that it's all a function of strategy.  Vitters swings at strikes and hits them.  So he rarely gets to 2-strike counts, and as a result he is rarely forces to chase bad balls.  Yes, he's strike-versus-ball selective.  But because he doesn't "select" within the strikezone but instead hits them all, he rarely gets to chase counts, and thus his contact rate looks better and his O-swing% looks superior.  For Jackson, because he takes strikes and gets himself into 2-strike counts, of course he's tempted to chase at a lot more non-strikes, so his O-swing% goes down.  And of course when he's chasing lots of 2-strike sliders that are outside of the strike zone, of course his contact rate goes way down too.  So the high P/PA --> low O-swing% --> low contact rate. 

Still, I wonder if the data doesn't suggest that Vitters isn't in better shape than we think.  If he's not chasing many non-strikes, then his plate discipline isn't that problematic.

And probably Jackson's low contact rate is not entirely rationalized by his pitch selectivity and by his higher frequency of 2-strike situations.  I think it probably reflects to some degree that he just swings and misses a lot.  Which I think we all knew....





Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 25, 2012, 05:48:16 pm
Most surprising, at least initially, is that Vitters has by far the lowest O-Swing% (percentage of swings taken outside the strike zone).  He's 7.8%, the others are all over 11%. 

His reputation has been as an undisciplined hacker who swings at everything.

I have not gotten the impression that he has the impression as an undisciplined hacker who swings at everything.

I have gotten the impression that he swings are everything IN the strike zone and does not lay off the pitches in the strike zone which he can not hit well, and which are thrown with less than two strikes when he could afford to take them.

A bit like you suggest as you continued....


Perhaps a different explanation that reb might prefer is that it's all a function of strategy.  Vitters swings at strikes and hits them.  So he rarely gets to 2-strike counts, and as a result he is rarely forces to chase bad balls.  Yes, he's strike-versus-ball selective.  But because he doesn't "select" within the strikezone but instead hits them all, he rarely gets to chase counts, and thus his contact rate looks better and his O-swing% looks superior.

And that is a function of plate discipline... or lack thereof.

But Vitters is hot lately: .432/.488/1.245 in his last 10 games/37 AB, 3 HR.  For the year the BA is up to .291 and OPS to .834.

Perhaps he will earn a September call-up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 25, 2012, 06:11:54 pm
Tonight will be a homecoming of sorts for Boise hitting coach Bill Buckner when the Hawks play in Spokane:

The 1970 Spokane team included

Manager Tom LaSorda
B. Buckner
S. Garvey
C. Hough
D. Lopes
D. Alexander
B. Russell
T. Paciorek
B. Valentine


They finished 94-52 in the Pacific Coast League.


http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/team.cgi?id=4b6c2834

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 25, 2012, 07:20:06 pm
jes, obviously your perception of Vitters was more accurate than mine.  I thought that he was not only non-selective within the strike zone, but that he grounded out on balls outside the zone.  This data suggests otherwise, at least for this year in which he's having decent success.  It's also possible that in increase in selectivity has contributed to him having better numbers this year.  He's .834OPS now, he was .770, .717, and .770 the last three seasons.  So perhaps the better OPS and the surprising 0Swing% go together.  Perhaps when his numbers relapse, so will his Oswing%?   

For the moment, today's HR nudges him ahead of Jackson in the HR race (12 to 11), and with the HR he nudges past Jackson in the OBP race and OPS race as well.  Both have solid HR production, which underlies how their OPS's are over .800. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 25, 2012, 07:20:47 pm
Cactus, that Dodgers Boise lineup is incredible. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 25, 2012, 08:49:18 pm
craig, it is possible that Vitters has actually turned a corner.  I don't believe he has ever had his OPS this high this late in the season.  But realistically about the best thing to hope for with Vitters may be that he hits well enough the rest of this season in AAA to get a September callup, simply to get a taste of what to expect and to see what he still needs to work on, then starts 2013 back in Iowa with the direction to become more disciplined at the plate, start "grinding out" his at bats, and lay off pitches in the strike zone that he can't drive.

The guy has 12 HR right now, which projects nicely over a full season, and that appears to be without really waiting on pitchers to put something into his hitting zone.  With the right direction, perhaps he could be next season's mid-June callup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 08:50:41 pm
Daytona Gm 2:


Szczur: 2-4, 2B, RBI, IBB, BB, SB

Burke: 5-5-3-3-3-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_25_dbcafa_sluafa_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 25, 2012, 08:54:17 pm
Baez hasn't gotten an extra-base hit since June 14, he's been in something of a slump.  (Some all-star days off, so it's not like 10 games without an EXH....)   He whiffed 3 times on Friday and went hitless on Saturday, he managed a single yesterday but reportedly had 1-pitch AB's in four of the five AB's. 

Today he got replaced in the fourth inning with the following weird description.  Hopefully not hurt too badly.
Quote
Steven Baron grounds out, pitcher Zach Cates to shortstop Javier Baez to first baseman Paul Hoilman.
Defensive Substitution: Anthony Giansanti replaces shortstop Javier Baez, batting 5th, playing third base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 25, 2012, 08:55:49 pm
Groin pull or hamstring?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 08:57:38 pm
Baez bare-handed a ball that had been deflected.

Hand injury of some sort.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 09:09:38 pm
DSL  Boxes:

*

Emeterio: 0-3, 2 RBI, 2 BB, K, 2 E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_25_dparok_dcurok_1



Santana: 6-6-2-2-1-6

Garcia: 3-0-0-0-1-2

Acosta: 1-2, 2B,  PH for in 6th


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_25_dchrok_dacrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 09:50:07 pm
Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_25_peoafx_cliafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 25, 2012, 10:33:36 pm
Vogelbach now has five hits, and four of them are doubles.  Isn't that important in one of those ISO stats?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 25, 2012, 10:40:11 pm
Vogelbach's early showing gives more credence to the thought that you shouldn't read too much into AZPhil's EST stats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 25, 2012, 11:07:50 pm
Amaya: 2-4, 2B   -  ( 12 for last 24, 2B, 3 3B, HR, 6 RBI )

Shoulders: 1-4, 3 K  - (15 K's in 29 AB's)

Arias: 5-3-1-1-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_25_boiasx_spoasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 26, 2012, 12:16:48 am
Vogelbach's early showing gives more credence to the thought that you shouldn't read too much into AZPhil's EST stats.

I think the stats for ESP, the fall rookie league, and even Mesa and to some extent Boise should be looked at with suspicion.  I think there is more tinkering with swings (even good ones) and pitching mechanics, etc than we dream about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2012, 12:38:42 am
Mesa:


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_25_clerok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2012, 03:49:16 am
Baez injured his finger but it's not serious. Day-to-day officially.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 26, 2012, 08:18:46 am
I think the stats for ESP, the fall rookie league, and even Mesa and to some extent Boise should be looked at with suspicion.  I think there is more tinkering with swings (even good ones) and pitching mechanics, etc than we dream about.

I think the stats in all of those leagues are barely worth the bytes used to generate the webpages they're displayed on.

I wouldn't even say "to some extent" Boise.  I'll pay a little attention if it's an 18 or 19 year old kid who does well there (although there are 19 year old stars like J.J. Johnson who turn into complete flops the moment they hit full season too), but otherwise, it's college age kids facing the same types of college age kids with almost the same varying degrees of ability they were facing in college during the spring.  Other than using a wood bat, there's not a lot of difference between what goes on there and what goes on in a decent college conference or good summer college league.

You can pretty much bank it that there are going to be later round guys like Condor Cash, Syketo Anderson, Pierre LePage, Kevin Collins, etc. who are going to set the world on fire this year in Boise, get people thinking they might be a real prospect, and then turn around and do absolutely nothing in Peoria next year and be out of baseball the year after that.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 26, 2012, 08:39:41 am
Heck even the guys who are legitimately viewed as prospects coming out of Boise often/usually take big downturns in their stats when they move on to full season.  Just look at Zeke DeVoss or Pin-Chieh Chen this year.  They were great in Boise, but they've been awful so far in Peoria.  Even for 18 year olds, Hak-Ju Lee in Boise is still easily the best stats he's put up in his career, for example.

It's just a weak weak weak level of play over there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 26, 2012, 08:49:43 am
I don't know that I'd characterize DeVoss' performance at Peoria as "awful".  His OBP is .368 although the rest of his offensive numbers are pretty weak.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 26, 2012, 12:16:07 pm
I think the stats in all of those leagues are barely worth the bytes used to generate the webpages they're displayed on.

I wouldn't even say "to some extent" Boise.  I'll pay a little attention if it's an 18 or 19 year old kid who does well there (although there are 19 year old stars like J.J. Johnson who turn into complete flops the moment they hit full season too), but otherwise, it's college age kids facing the same types of college age kids with almost the same varying degrees of ability they were facing in college during the spring.  Other than using a wood bat, there's not a lot of difference between what goes on there and what goes on in a decent college conference or good summer college league.

You can pretty much bank it that there are going to be later round guys like Condor Cash, Syketo Anderson, Pierre LePage, Kevin Collins, etc. who are going to set the world on fire this year in Boise, get people thinking they might be a real prospect, and then turn around and do absolutely nothing in Peoria next year and be out of baseball the year after that.   

It is true that it is not a good idea to consider someone a prospect just because he does extremely well at Mesa or Boise.  Personally, until they start hitting breaking balls well, which usually can not be done until Daytona, I look upon great stats as far secondary to scouting reports.

But I was specifically talking about BAD stats in the lower levels.  I think there is too much experimentation, adjusting and tinkering being done without our knowledge to be able to look only at the stats and make judgements.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 26, 2012, 01:32:58 pm
That's interesting, Dave.  It's worth remembering for me. 

I think in general good production doesn't mean it will hold up at higher levels.  But bad stats in short-season probably means you've got problems. 

Often the XST are very small samples, so have natural randomness.  The hitters are typically 50-80 AB or so?  And the pitchers 10-20 innings?  A pitcher is one bad game from bad stats, and a hitter one big day from turning bad into good.  An interesting note is that Candelero has what, 4 HR's for Boise?  He had like one, maybe two, in XST? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 26, 2012, 02:05:47 pm
ArizonaPhil

Vogelbach's approach at the plate was way out of kilter at Extended Spring Training (189/306/379 in 111 PA) and he displayed a lot of visible frustration with how things were going (not to mention the ten errors at 1st base), but it looks like he's got the old Vogelbomb swing back now. Hopefully it's just matter of time before he starts depositing baseballs over the fence.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 26, 2012, 02:12:31 pm
From low minors, some of the stats I do find interesting are IsoD and IsoP rates.

If vogelbach ran a .120 IsoD and approx .200 IsoP, those are much more important than a deflated Avg.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2012, 03:11:07 pm
Jackson: 1-5, 3 K   ( 8 for last 40 w/ 21 K's )

Vitters: 1-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_26_rreaaa_iowaaa_1


Francescon: 6 IP, 2 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_26_dbcafa_sluafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 26, 2012, 03:31:23 pm
Vitters extended his hitting streak to nine games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2012, 05:20:51 pm
A bit on Vitters:

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20120626/SPORTS/120626007/?odyssey=nav|head
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 26, 2012, 05:49:54 pm
The thing I found most interesting from that article was Vitters' description of his relationship with Rizzo as that of being a good friend.

I've heard that Vitters, Jackson, and Rizzo are something of a "three amigos," and it hit me that they are all from sunny beach states. Vitters and Jackson from California, Rizzo from Florida. This is a stereotype for sure, but one associates California and Florida (to a lesser extent) with a certain lifestyle and laid-back attitude. I'm sure their similar experiences have made for easy friendships. On the flip side, everything I've ever read on Jackon and Rizzo suggests they are bright, determined guys, whereas Vitters has come off as less than impressive in interviews and such.

I wonder if Rizzo and Jackson have had any impact on Vitters in terms of blending that young-guy-from-a-sunny-state attitude with the drive and focus they both seem to posses. Lots of assumptions and stereotypes for sure, but it pricked my interest at least.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 26, 2012, 06:05:54 pm
Vitters is from Orange County and Jackson is from the Oakland suburbs. Big state.n :D
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 26, 2012, 06:28:41 pm
Please don't put NorCal in the same category with Orange County or Florida.  We're elite!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 26, 2012, 06:35:54 pm
Sorry, P2 :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 26, 2012, 06:43:07 pm
Please don't put NorCal in the same category with Orange County or Florida.  We're elite!

Especially Sacramentans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2012, 08:44:05 pm
DSL:

*
Acosta: 1-2, 2 BB, HBP

Torrez: 6-6-1-1-1-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_26_dchrok_dmerok_1



Emeterio: 1-3, RBI

Mejias: 5-1/3 -5-2-2-2-5


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_26_dorrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2012, 09:43:00 pm
Baez scratched.

Geiger: 2-5, RBI, SB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_26_peoafx_cliafx_1



Smokies:


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_26_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 26, 2012, 10:16:05 pm
Cubs DSL1 team faced a pitcher named Elvis.
Cubs DSL2 team faced a pitcher named Yrelvis.

Just thought that was worth mentioning. If they meet, a whole "Who's on First" kind of exchange could take place....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 26, 2012, 11:26:58 pm
Simpson: 3-1/3 -2-1-0-1-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_26_boiasx_spoasx_1


Vogelbach: 2-3, 2B, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_26_cubrok_dodrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on June 26, 2012, 11:43:54 pm
According to Boise Hawks radio Twitter, Simpson didn't throw a single pitch over 85 MPH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 27, 2012, 01:53:27 am
BA on Jackson's Ks.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/06/brett-jacksons-k-troubles-continue/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 27, 2012, 08:25:53 am
Quote
There are scouts who think that Jackson will lessen his strikeouts as he learns to avoid so many deep counts, but for now, his tendency for strikeouts is keeping him from taking advantage of his numerous tools.

So Jackson is grinding out too many at bats?

Of course, if he avoids deep counts, that's also going to reduce his walk rate.  It possibly/probably wouldn't be a bad thing for him to trade some walks for some base hits, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 27, 2012, 09:48:37 am
Boise recap

Quote
NOTES - The game was delayed by 12 minutes at the outset due to a wet infield - with a driving rainstorm plauging the teams in the late innings...temperatures were in the 40s throughout, with a 15-25 mile per hour wind blowing out to left...Jeimer Candelario extended his hit streak to seven with a sixth inning single...Gioskar Amaya had his seven-game hit streak and 11-game streak of reaching base snapped, as did Marco Hernandez's seven-game hit streak...

The stadium in Spokane does not have a tarp.

http://boise.hawks.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120627&content_id=34003354&vkey=news_t480&fext=.jsp&sid=t480 (http://boise.hawks.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120627&content_id=34003354&vkey=news_t480&fext=.jsp&sid=t480)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 27, 2012, 10:11:32 am
Boise recap

The stadium in Spokane does not have a tarp.

http://boise.hawks.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120627&content_id=34003354&vkey=news_t480&fext=.jsp&sid=t480 (http://boise.hawks.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120627&content_id=34003354&vkey=news_t480&fext=.jsp&sid=t480)

Is that because it rains so rarely there?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 27, 2012, 10:15:37 am
Eastern Washington and eastern Oregon are a lot different from along the coast. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 27, 2012, 10:18:20 am
The average annual rainfall in Spokane is less than 17 inches.  That compares with San Francisco, for example, which gets over 22 inches of rain per year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 27, 2012, 10:26:10 am
The average annual rainfall in Spokane is less than 17 inches.  That compares with San Francisco, for example, which gets over 22 inches of rain per year.

And as I have always said, 5 inches is huge.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 27, 2012, 10:44:07 am
The average annual rainfall in Spokane is less than 17 inches.  That compares with San Francisco, for example, which gets over 22 inches of rain per year.

That explains why Utah Phillips (Golden Voice of the Great Southwest) settled in Spokane (before he died). Fine songwriter, storyteller and master of really awful (in a good way) puns.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 27, 2012, 10:46:53 am
That explains why Utah Phillips (Golden Voice of the Great Southwest) settled in Spokane (before he died). Fine songwriter, storyteller and master of really awful (in a good way) puns.

PlayTwo lives in Spokane?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 27, 2012, 11:09:38 am
Are you implying that my puns are awful in a good way?  Much obliged.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 27, 2012, 11:09:58 am
I have to admit, I am well Spokane.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on June 27, 2012, 12:07:03 pm

With respect to the short-season to full-season transition

While Pin-Chieh Chen got off to a terrible start this spring, he has played quite well that last month or so.  For example, over his last 71 AB he is batting 0.324 with 10 SB, 10 walks, and only 11 Ks.

Other players doing well this last month in the minors include Rizzo (obviously), Watkins, Wright, Hoilman, and Jackson.

Pitchers doing well this last month include McDonald, Struck, Zych, Loosen, Rosario, Wang, Cabrera, Burke, Liria, and Reed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: sam hannam on June 27, 2012, 07:06:18 pm
Javier Baez is back in the Chiefs lineup tonight as the DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 27, 2012, 07:09:18 pm
And Brett Jackson is not in the lineup for the I-Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 27, 2012, 07:12:13 pm
Matt Szczur has hit a grand slam to put Daytona up 11-0 in the top of the fifth.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2012, 08:13:05 pm
Dunston: 2-4, K

Candelario: 0-3, BB, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_27_boiasx_spoasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2012, 08:29:00 pm
Szczur: 3-6, 2B, GS, 4 RBI,

Kirk: 6-5-0-0-2-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_27_dbcafa_sluafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2012, 09:31:36 pm
Baez: 0-4,  (3 for last 21)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_27_peoafx_cliafx_1


Lake: 0-3, BB, 2 K, 2 E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_27_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 27, 2012, 10:27:47 pm
David Bote 3-run HR in his debut.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2012, 10:36:31 pm
Vitters: 2-4, 2B, 3B, RBI, BB, E

Jackson: 0-1, K  (PH)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_27_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on June 27, 2012, 10:41:33 pm
Vitters now slugging .500.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 27, 2012, 11:45:17 pm
Vogelbach: 1-3, BB

Gretzky: 0-4,   (1-13 overall)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_27_angrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2012, 01:19:22 am
DSL

*

Malave: 2-4, 2B, RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_27_dmerok_dchrok_1


DSL 1:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_27_dcurok_dorrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2012, 01:31:30 am
Kevin Goldstein not a Szczur fan:

Quote
Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein

The fascination just baffles me. 4th OF, maybe Reed Johnson type. RT @RWKrupp: @Kevin_Goldstein Why do Cubs fans love Szczur?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on June 28, 2012, 02:40:51 am
Kevin Goldstein not a Szczur fan:


That's okay, I hear that Szczur isn't a fan of Goldstein, either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 28, 2012, 08:21:37 am
Let's see, good CF glove, good speed, good baserunning, good base-stealing, good OBP, good attitude, good character... what's to like about the guy?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 28, 2012, 08:23:59 am
All I have to say to Goldstein is:  Et tu, Brute?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on June 28, 2012, 08:25:19 am
I saw in the Iowa boxscore that Vitters played first base.  Hopefully that was just a one time thing.  If he starts playing first regularly, that would be really disappointing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 28, 2012, 08:29:16 am
Goldschmidt is probably right, given the norms.  Szc is almost 23, has a .777 OPS in A-ball, seemingly has no HR power (1 over-the-wall HR), and may soon not be even among the better 3 defensive CFers if that in the system.  (Once Almora signs, might not Ha, Jackson, and Almora all be ahead of Szczur?  And Trey Martin, Shawon Dunston, and Baez are supposed be very promising too.)  Obviously most players don't do as well in the majors as they do in A.  So if it's only going to go downhill for Szczur, not much reason to be very excited.  Except that it seems like he's still an improving player.  So perhaps continued improvement will more than offset more difficult levels of competition. 

Reed Johnson has only once had an OBP in the majors as high as what Szczur has at Daytona right now. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 28, 2012, 09:42:00 am
I'm still pretty encouraged by Szczur's season so far.  That is a tough league for hitters.  The only Daytona hitters I remember who have put up monster stats there are Hee Seop Choi and Jason Dubois.

A .121 IsoP in Daytona is not bad.  The nearly 1:1 strikeout to walk ratio he has is pretty good for a future leadoff hitter. 

The biggest thing for Szczur is developing more gap power.  If he can get to 10-15 homers a season, he can definitely be an effective leadoff hitter and a poor man's Kenny Lofton. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on June 28, 2012, 11:28:39 am
Puig signed with the Dodger's 7 years, $42 million.  Soler looks like a steal against that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on June 28, 2012, 11:33:41 am
Hopefully the contract is signed and Soler's agent didn't raise the price.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on June 28, 2012, 11:55:40 am
wow...shocked at what Puig got.  Would have loved to have seen the Cubs sign him, but I can understand letting him pass for that price.  Plus, outfield depth is the one thing they have plenty(I almost put "of" and let my participle dangle).  But with no alternative to spend it on with July 2 around, he could have been an asset that allowed for him or another to be traded down the road.

If Dodgers are realistic in their expectations that he could play in majors later this year, then he might turn out to be a steal if he turns into a plus guy over the next year or so.  Though it does appear every scout Law talked to said he was not on Soler's level as a prospect, so thankfully, we hopefully got the better player in the long run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 28, 2012, 01:06:07 pm
Too bad.  He sounded like a really good prospect and I hoped we'd get him while we were in the process of buying up Cuba. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 28, 2012, 01:30:02 pm

Cryptic tweet from Brett Jackson
Brett Jackson ‏@TheBJacksI'm going away for a period of time. I'll be back when I'm back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 28, 2012, 01:34:12 pm
When you look at Vitters improvement compared to last year, it's basically some incremental small-step stuff adding up.  He's added some HR production, and he's added some IsoD.  Not crazy-change stuff, but the normal kind of small-step improvements in HR's and discipline that you'd expect from age 21 to 22

His per-500-AB HR rate has jumped from 15.6 to 21.7.  Which almost exactly explains his 10 point jump in batting average and 50-point jump in slugging. 

Add in a modest jump in walks, IsoD has jumped from .039 to .051. 

A few more walks and a few more HR's add up.  The nice thing is that it hasn't cost him a lot to add those.  HIs K-rate is up by 36%,   

I'm very optimistic that he has learning space for some addition incremental steps in both areas.  But again, I think it's a lot about the HR's.  He's boosted his, and everything else has followed. 


During the last two months, Vitters has been on a nice 1HR/3K ride.  21K/7HR in May, 14K/5HR in June.  Not Rizzo-esque, but when you hit that many HR's relative to your K's, a high batting average always follows. 


If Szczur could add some HR's, we'd see a lot of nice progress in his numbers.  If only he could.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on June 28, 2012, 01:46:52 pm
Kevin Goldstein not a Szczur fan:

Too bad Goldstein has better XBH power than Szczur
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 28, 2012, 01:53:08 pm
Quote
If Szczur could add some HR's, we'd see a lot of nice progress in his numbers.  If only he could.

You never know about these things, but it seems like he might.  For one thing, power is often the last thing to develop in a hitter, and for another, Daytona and the FSL are tough places to hit for power.  BA has projected "average" power for him.  (Although it seems like BA has been a lot more bullish on Szczur than everyone else, with Callis who I think sometimes falls for Fleita gush.)

Call me cautiously optimistic on Szczur's power developing.  It seems like right now that's the only thing really lacking from his profile. 


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on June 28, 2012, 03:58:16 pm
Wonder what Brett Jackson meant in that tweet?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 28, 2012, 03:59:58 pm
Brett Jackson is leading off and playing center field for Iowa tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 28, 2012, 04:00:00 pm
He doesn't like the Supreme Court ruling and he's moving to Canada.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 28, 2012, 04:01:29 pm
Draftees LHP Michael Heesch, RHP Eddie Orozco, RHP Mike Hamann, and OF Bijan Rademacher are now with Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 28, 2012, 06:59:32 pm
Whitenack pitching, a run in the second inning.  I'm hoping after a good start last time, that he'll start stringing together some capable starts. 

After two innings Szczur has a hit, a walk, two stolen bases, two runs scored, and threw a runner out who was going for a double. 

For the moment his average is up to .284, his OBP is up over .380, and I think his OPS is within a HR (or less) of .800.


McNutt scatters 6 hits and a walk and a HBP over 0.2 innings while allowing 8 runs before getting removed.  But thanks to one error four of the runs are excused and only four count against him.  Guys can change, of course, so who knows what he'll become later.  But he's not very good now.  Heh, remember when Hendry was going afer Garza, and the Cubs said Archer yes but McNutt no?  Not so easy for pitchng prospects, you never know what will happen to them. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2012, 09:45:15 pm
Szczur: 3-3, 2 RBI, 2 BB, 3 SB, CS, Assist

Alcantara: 3-5, HR, 4 RBI, SB, E

Whitenack: 4-6-3-2-0-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_28_dunafa_dbcafa_1



Lake: 2-5, RBI, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_28_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 28, 2012, 09:52:03 pm
Szczur gets BA to .290, OBP over .390, and OPS over .800.  I think he's kinda hot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 28, 2012, 09:59:38 pm
Craig - it is considered sexist to comment upon a player's looks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 28, 2012, 10:02:17 pm
Heh, remember when Hendry was going afer Garza, and the Cubs said Archer yes but McNutt no? 

Honestly, I thought Hendry was full of BS when he said that.  He just wanted to spin it to where it would look like we hadn't just traded off our top prospect in the deal.

And as I've said all along, when Trey McNutt is your top pitching prospect, that just means the pitching in your farm system is not very good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 28, 2012, 10:03:45 pm
Szczur gets BA to .290, OBP over .390, and OPS over .800.  I think he's kinda hot.

So basically what needs to happen now is for him to go into a 3 for 24 type of slump, which will convince Oneri that it's time to promote him to Double-A.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2012, 10:07:24 pm
Baez: 3-4, 2 2B, BB, 3 SB

Geiger: 1-4, 2B, RBI, BB, 2 K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_28_peoafx_wisafx_1


Jackson: 1-5, 2 K

Vitters: 0-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_28_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2012, 10:33:10 pm
DSL:

*

Rodriguez: 5-5-1-1-1-8

Emeterio: 0-1, 3 BB, SB, CS/PO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_28_dcurok_ddirok_1



Acosta: 0-4, K, E

Malave: 1-3, BB, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_28_dchrok_dyarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 28, 2012, 10:58:49 pm
Hernandez: 1-4, BB, 2 E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_28_spoasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2012, 12:12:22 am
Vitters makes the PCL all-star team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2012, 12:27:25 am
Vogelbach: 1-5, 2B, RBI, 2 K


Martinez: Pumarino: 5-3-0-0-0-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_28_cubrok_diarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2012, 02:52:14 am
Hawks' OF Dong-Yub Kim has switched from throwing right-handed to left-handed:

http://www.idahopress.com/sports/hawks-kim-makes-most-of-change/article_be7be4d8-c1b3-11e1-a7ea-0019bb2963f4.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 29, 2012, 07:14:41 am
I misjudged the Szczur numbers.  .389 OBP and .798 OPS. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 29, 2012, 07:38:51 am
Hoyer & Sveum on Brett Jackson:

“Brett can determine his own future by just dominating down there and forcing our hand,” Hoyer said. “I hope he does that. He’s a really good talent. He’s got a great future ahead of him and I think he’ll be in a Cubs uniform for a long time. But when he forces us to call him up based on his performance, then I think we’ll see him here.”
 
 Jackson, a potential five-tool outfielder from Cal-Berkeley, was hitting .254 with 11 homers and 111 strikeouts through 75 games at Iowa.
 
 “It’s very alarming,” manager Dale Sveum said. “He’s on a pace to strike out 200 times in a minor-league season, which is not easy to do, despite having an OPS of .850. It’s a strange, strange stat. You just watch on video and you don’t understand how he can put together some at-bats and then just have some uncontested at-bats.
 
 “It’s a very strange occurrence, really, for a guy with bat speed and quickness and that kind of athleticism.”


http://www.csnchicago.com/06/28/12/Hoyers-message-to-Cubs-Come-and-get-it/landing_cubs2.html?blockID=732416&feedID=10336 (http://www.csnchicago.com/06/28/12/Hoyers-message-to-Cubs-Come-and-get-it/landing_cubs2.html?blockID=732416&feedID=10336)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on June 29, 2012, 07:45:21 am
Refreshing honesty.  A really refreshing change from the incomprehensible blather of the Hendry regime.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2012, 07:55:47 am
After two innings Szczur has a hit, a walk, two stolen bases, two runs scored

This underscores why I like Szczur.

Leadoff hitters are supposed to score runs, and that is what Szczur does.

149 runs scored in 189 professional games.  55 runs in 66 games in Peoria last year and 50 runs in 55 games this year.  Last year in A ball, Reds' speedster prospect Billy Hamilton led the league in runs scored with 99, going along with 103 steals, but that was in 135 games.  Szczur was 37th in that league in runs scored last year, but no one with even 35 runs scored in that league was scoring as many runs per game, and that includes looking at power hitters.  It's the same thing this year.  Only one hitter in the Florida State league has score more than Szczur, and that guy has only one more run scored, in 19 more games played.  Nice as it is to hit HR, the goal is to score runs, and Szczur seems to do that very well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on June 29, 2012, 08:17:49 am
Good post, Jes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 29, 2012, 09:26:07 am
Law of averages.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 29, 2012, 09:39:24 am
Hoyer & Sveum on considerations for moving minor leaguers to the majors, and on Vitters specifically:


Epstein and Hoyer are trying to build a team for Wrigley Field, one that will be good year after year after year.
 
 “That was our goal when we started,” Sveum said, “to (have) to earn getting to the big leagues, whether it’s throwing strikes as a pitcher, (or) not striking out, taking your walks as a hitter. (It’s) not promoting people for a .220 average and 30 home runs. That’s not what we want to create here.
 
 “We want to create quality hitters (because) one day (here the wind’s) blowing out, but there’s a lot of days where it’s blowing in, and you got to keep the line moving. And you’re not going to do it with home runs all the time.”
 
 Vitters, the No. 3 overall pick in the 2007 draft, got more hype than Rizzo when they were teammates on an elite national traveling team as teenagers.
 
 Vitters, who’s still only 22, was named a PCL All-Star on Thursday after hitting .293 with 12 homers and 40 RBI through 76 games, his first half-season on the Triple-A level. He has matured, though there are questions about his defense at third base.
 
 “Just because a guy’s playing well in the minor leagues doesn’t mean you want to move him like right away,” Hoyer said. “Let (Josh) get comfortable and prove it to a certain extent, but we’re really happy.
 
 “I know he’s had some really good moments in the minor leagues, but this is probably the most consistency (and) the best performance he’s shown since he’s been a Cub. We don’t need to upset the apple cart too much.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 29, 2012, 11:19:10 am
Hoyer & Sveum on Brett Jackson:

...
 “It’s very alarming,” manager Dale Sveum said. “He’s on a pace to strike out 200 times in a minor-league season, which is not easy to do, despite having an OPS of .850. It’s a strange, strange stat. You just watch on video and you don’t understand how he can put together some at-bats and then just have some uncontested at-bats.
 
 “It’s a very strange occurrence, really, for a guy with bat speed and quickness and that kind of athleticism.”


http://www.csnchicago.com/06/28/12/Hoyers-message-to-Cubs-Come-and-get-it/landing_cubs2.html?blockID=732416&feedID=10336 (http://www.csnchicago.com/06/28/12/Hoyers-message-to-Cubs-Come-and-get-it/landing_cubs2.html?blockID=732416&feedID=10336)

Quote
Refreshing honesty.  A really refreshing change from the incomprehensible blather of the Hendry regime.


Yes.  Not only that, but it's refreshing that the manager is watching and interested.  Was Lou Piniella or Don Baylor sitting down and actually watching pitch-by-pitch AB's of Felix Pie or Corey Patterson?  I think managers often knew the prospects only by how they looked in ST (Sveum thought Jackson looked fantastic; Corey's speed and BP power greatly impressed Baylor...) 


Speaks to the opportunities of the computer/technology age that Sveum can sit and watch those AB's.  But it also speaks to his interest and investment in the long-term plan that he cares enough to be watching Jackson's AB's.  And that he's not rushing for a Vitters or Jackson callup, even though right now Vitters really might be better than what we've got at 3B, and before Rizzo Jackson with all his problems would still have probably been better than Campana or Byrd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2012, 11:50:23 am
Hawks' OF ****-Yub Kim has switched from throwing right-handed to left-handed:

http://www.idahopress.com/sports/hawks-kim-makes-most-of-change/article_be7be4d8-c1b3-11e1-a7ea-0019bb2963f4.html

ArizonaPhil reported that this spring.  I don't know if he had a sore right shoulder, or if he just wanted to go easy on it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 29, 2012, 11:50:51 am
Lou would be saying that Reggie Jackson down there in the minors was a good looking player in the spring.  He's striking out a lot?  Huh.  Well, it can't be too bad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 29, 2012, 02:02:58 pm
J.J. Cooper on Brett Jackson's K problems.  Seems like this goes hand in hand with some of the talk about two-strike hitting a while back.

Quote
J.J. Cooper: One of the things that I've heard is that he takes a whole lot of pitches, and he's yet to realize that he doesn't have the bat control and hand-eye to handle getting into two strike counts over and over while trying to work pitchers for the pitch he's looking for.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 29, 2012, 02:17:23 pm
Quote
Hunter (VA): Gerardo Concepcion - buy or sell the Cubs arguing that he'd dominate A ball if they simply let him go with his secondary stuff (reportedly, he's "working on his fastball").

J.J. Cooper: Sell...Sell...Sell...Actually if you read Ben Badler's reports here at Baseball America you probably never bought him to begin with.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2012, 02:21:16 pm
ArizonaPhil reported that this spring.  I don't know if he had a sore right shoulder, or if he just wanted to go easy on it.

From the link: Kim missed the 2010 season with surgery to his right shoulder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 29, 2012, 02:56:19 pm
I think somebody at the Concepcion game yesterday said it was all offspeed junk he was throwing in the first inning yesterday.  He just couldn't control any of it.  Soft-tossing finesse junkballer who can't locate/finesse any of his junk?  And none of his junk moves enough to fool even A-ballers enough to once in a while strike them out? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2012, 03:25:20 pm
On the other hand, consistency is supposed to be important.  Concepcion is probably the most consistent pitcher the Cubs have in their system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2012, 04:54:41 pm
Szczur atop BA's Hot Sheet and Candelario makes Helium Watch:



Quote
No. 1 MATT SZCZUR, CF CUBS
Team: high Class A Daytona (Florida State)
Age: 22

Why He's Here: .478/.600/.696 (11-for-23), 2 2B, 1 HR, 7 R, 7 RBIs, 7 BB, 2 SO, 7-for-8 SB

The Scoop: Szczur entered the year as a breakout candidate after wearing down from his baseball/football grind in the second half of last season. He recently missed 19 games due to a knee injury that kept him from playing in the Florida State League all-star game, but he has made up for lost time this past week, splitting his time between center field and DH as a precaution. The injury didn't seem to affect Szczur's plus-plus speed, as he swiped seven bases in eight attempts.

Before the injury, Szczur led the FSL in runs, stolen bases and on-base percentage. On Wednesday, he came within a triple of hitting for the cycle, when he went 4-for-6 with a homer, a double, four RBIs and two runs scored. Perhaps the most refreshing development for Szczur this year has been has improved plate discipline, as his walk percentage has dramatically increased from 5.4 percent last year to 12.5 percent this year. An extraordinary athlete, Szczur looks like he's starting to combine his raw tools with performance and could see a promotion to Double-A Tennessee soon enough.



Quote
• Jeimer Candelario, 3b, Cubs. Chicago skipped the 18-year-old Candelario, a standout in last year's Dominican Summer League, past the Arizona League to short-season Boise, and they've had no regrets through the first two weeks. The switch-hitter homered in three straight games from June 20-22 and leads the Northwest League with four bombs. Candelario has batted .314/.364/.569 through 51 at-bats, showcasing plenty of bat speed to go with plus pitch-recognition skills.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613626.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 29, 2012, 05:05:52 pm
Thanks for sharing Chris (as usual).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2012, 07:57:38 pm
Before the injury, Szczur led the FSL in runs, stolen bases and on-base percentage. On Wednesday, he came within a triple of hitting for the cycle, when he went 4-for-6 with a homer, a double, four RBIs and two runs scored. Perhaps the most refreshing development for Szczur this year has been has improved plate discipline, as his walk percentage has dramatically increased from 5.4 percent last year to 12.5 percent this year. An extraordinary athlete, Szczur looks like he's starting to combine his raw tools with performance and could see a promotion to Double-A Tennessee soon enough.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613626.html

If Szczur does well enough to merit a mid-season promotion, and then does well enough in Tennessee and in spring training to start in Iowa next year, he could easily be in Wrigley before the end of 2013.

Szczur, Rizzo, Castro, and perhaps Vitters and Jackson, could make for an exciting young nucleus late in 2013.  Not a team I would expect to do well in 2012, but still interesting to watch for the promise of 2014 and beyond.

If those guys do all reach and perform well in the majors, with all of them sharing the highly productive years from age 25-30, THAT would be the time to start looking for a couple of dips into the deep end of the FA pool, and that is one of the reasons not to do so now, so that budget flexibility is available when it can be leveraged into something quite meaningful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 29, 2012, 08:47:35 pm
After a horrendous start, Ronald Torreyes is gradually coming back to the league.  So far today he is three for four with a home run and a double.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2012, 09:01:34 pm
Torreyes has actually been doing pretty well for a while now.  Before today, his line for June was .321/.385/.481/.866, which is pretty nice for a glove-first middle infielder.  Unfortunately those games in April and May were pretty ugly.  He had an OPS of .630 in April and .382 in May.  That May was one fugly month.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2012, 09:25:34 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, K

Alcantara: 2-4, SF, RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_29_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 29, 2012, 09:31:32 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, K

Alcantara: 2-4, SF, RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_29_dunafa_dbcafa_1

Even more important with Szczur is one more figure on that stat line -- 3 more runs score from those 4 AB.  He has now scored 53 runs in 55 games and 214 AB.  In a 600 AB season, that rate would project to 149 runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 29, 2012, 09:41:18 pm
Torreyes isn't really glove first. The reason he's a prospect is his extraordinary contact rate.

If you look at his awful months early, his BABIP was extremely low, especially compared to his K-rate. That was going to normalize, and we've seen just that in June.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2012, 09:53:58 pm
Zych: 1-3-1-1-1-1  (AA debut)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_29_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2012, 10:10:48 pm
Vitters: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI

Jackson: 2-5, RBI, SB, K

Cabrera: 2-2-0-0-0-3  (2nd app back in Iowa)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_29_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 29, 2012, 10:20:18 pm
I have to say, at the start of the season, I thought the promotion to Triple-A was more than likely going to finish off Vitters as an interesting prospect this year.  I figured being a mediocre hitter the last couple of years, there was no way he would take to Triple-A well at all. 

In April when he was holding his own against Triple-A pitchers and not being overmatched, it started catching my attention a little bit, and I thought if we parked him at Triple-A a couple of more years, the power would come along and you might have someone interesting.

But man, the last two months he's had have been unreal.  Never ever thought coming into the year he'd be looking this good right now.  Even if he does slow down eventually, the guy is 22 and has shown for a very long stretch that he can excel against advanced pitching.  Even if he goes into another slump, you have to figure eventually he's going to get it and become a consistent hitter at 23 or 24.  With the way he's going now, though, he may have already totally figured things out at the plate.  It's really exciting to see how he's come along, and the odds of him having a bona fide major league career are looking really good.  If we're lucky, maybe we have an Aramis Ramirez type bat with him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 29, 2012, 10:25:11 pm
BTW Iowa comes to Nashville starting tomorrow night.  Can't wait to watch him play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2012, 10:34:44 pm
Baez: 2-5, 3B, K, PO/CS

Geiger: 0-4, K, 4 E

Jensen: 5-6-6-3-1-6, 2 HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_29_peoafx_wisafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 29, 2012, 10:41:23 pm
I have to say, at the start of the season, I thought the promotion to Triple-A was more than likely going to finish off Vitters as an interesting prospect this year.  I figured being a mediocre hitter the last couple of years, there was no way he would take to Triple-A well at all. 

In April when he was holding his own against Triple-A pitchers and not being overmatched, it started catching my attention a little bit, and I thought if we parked him at Triple-A a couple of more years, the power would come along and you might have someone interesting.

But man, the last two months he's had have been unreal.  Never ever thought coming into the year he'd be looking this good right now.  Even if he does slow down eventually, the guy is 22 and has shown for a very long stretch that he can excel against advanced pitching.  Even if he goes into another slump, you have to figure eventually he's going to get it and become a consistent hitter at 23 or 24.  With the way he's going now, though, he may have already totally figured things out at the plate.  It's really exciting to see how he's come along, and the odds of him having a bona fide major league career are looking really good.  If we're lucky, maybe we have an Aramis Ramirez type bat with him.

Good post.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 29, 2012, 10:54:55 pm
Torreyes isn't really glove first. The reason he's a prospect is his extraordinary contact rate.

If you look at his awful months early, his BABIP was extremely low, especially compared to his K-rate. That was going to normalize, and we've seen just that in June.

Torreyes made his 6th error a day or two ago.  That's pretty low for a middle infielder.  Of course, Alcantara has 28 or so, and he's a little older, so maybe my frame of reference is a little skewed.   

His BABIP is astonishingly low.  With 17K/4HR, his average isn't depressed hardly at all by balls not in play, so his average is almost entirely BABIP.  Can't be over .250, I don't think.  A whole lot of really weak contact combined with perhaps some bad luck.  A bad wrist for a while perhaps contributed to some weak contact.  His K-rate remains really low, though, so if the contact he made wasn't so weak, you'd think he ought to end up hitting for excellent average.  Obviously he'll need to, because many HR's and many walks both appear relatively unlikely.  But it would sure be fun if he kept his recent splurge going, and anded up the summer looking like a prospect to be pretty optimistic about.   

He's hit 3 HR's in the last 10 days.  The one yesterday (I think) was said to be over the scoreboard.  Like Vitters, his walk rate has taken a limited but perhaps real incremental small-step. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 29, 2012, 11:05:14 pm
Quote
Before the injury, Szczur led the FSL in runs, stolen bases and on-base percentage.

It's astonishing how SB have become so rare.   He had 19 SB, half-way through the minor league season, and that was tops. Pretty astonishing that 19 SB would have been the league lead in the large FSL league.  Even after his time off, he's now one behind the leader, teammate Andreoli.   

More astonishing is the OBP part.  His OBP was around .360 pre-injury.  Could that possibly have been league lead?  I think it's too astonishing to be true. 

OK, I just went and checked and it most certainly it was not correct, the OBP part.  There are currently 19 qualifiers with OBPS over .360 in the FSL, and even now that he's up to .393, he's still only 5th in the league.  Still, that's an awfully good OBP for a speedster with good contact skills.  His OPS is now up to .809.  Barely a week or so since it was in the .730's. 

It's been a pretty exciting week on the farm, I think. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 29, 2012, 11:08:27 pm
Candelario: 1-3, RBI, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_29_spoasx_boiasx_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on June 30, 2012, 12:46:32 am
It is great to see Josh Vitters keep hitting.

He'd be my 3rd baseman if I were Dale Sveum.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2012, 05:02:06 am
Quote
Meanwhile, maybe Brett Jackson should have cut his hair sooner.

A day after shearing off his once-flowing locks, the strikeout-prone center fielder had a big game with two hits, an RBI and a run scored.

“I buzzed my head in 2010 — and I had a pretty good season,” Jackson said.

He buzzed it again Thursday, not so much to change his luck at the plate but because of the summer weather.

“It’s getting hot,” the personable Jackson said. “It feels good.”

If an offshoot of the cool look slows a propensity to whiff — then that’s a good thing, too.

“It can’t hurt,” he offered.

....

None, however, have an eye-popping statistic like Jackson — 113 strikeouts in 297 at-bats after striking out once Friday.

“I believe to master your craft, you have to battle and struggle with it,” Jackson said. “In the end, this is going to be a great experience for me.”

It’s such a phenomenon that Chicago Cubs manager Dale Sveum called it “alarming” during a recent interview with reporters in Chicago. “He’s on a pace to strike out 200 times in a minor-league season, which is not an easy thing to do,” Sveum said.

That’s why Jackson is changing his approach for the season’s final 50 games.

“Obviously I’ve been striking out too much, so I’m cutting down on my swing and trying to be more of who I am,” Jackson, 23, said. “I was trying to be someone probably greater than who I am, and who I am is a player I think can help a team win, with the speed I have.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2012, 05:42:47 am
Je Baez: 3-4, 2B, 3 RBI, SB, K, Assist

Paulino: 4-12-7-5-0-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_29_ddirok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 30, 2012, 09:13:42 am
Richard Jones hit 24 HR's last year for Peoria.  He has zero for Daytona.  Although he still has plenty of serious batting-practice power. 

HR's are more about hitting than power. 

Carlos Correa, the top pick in the draft who was bombing opposite field HR's into the wind off of Dale Sveum, is off to a .481 OPS start in his first 9 pro games.  Apparently even rookie-leaguers throw with more speed and movement than Sveum, so that to date Correa's awesome power hasn't connected.  Buxton is off to a .289 OPS in his first 5 games.  Between XST and Mesa, the hugely strong Vogelbach has what, 1 HR? 

Almora hasn't drawn the power awe that Correa or Soler or Vogelbach have.  But it may be that he'll be as good or better a HR hitter, if it turns out that he's as good or better a regular-old hitter. 

Jones, Malava, Vogelbach, these are some very strong, powerful BP hitters.  But that doesn't mean they can hit HR's like Tiny Torreyes!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2012, 09:40:15 am
[Torreyes'] BABIP is astonishingly low.  With 17K/4HR, his average isn't depressed hardly at all by balls not in play, so his average is almost entirely BABIP.  Can't be over .250, I don't think.  A whole lot of really weak contact combined with perhaps some bad luck.  A bad wrist for a while perhaps contributed to some weak contact.

That was my read on his performance, and if you look at his prior years, that would be consistent.  In low A last year that low K rate produced a .356 BA, with only 3 HR, and in Venezuela that low K rate helped him hit .390.

But it would sure be fun if he kept his recent splurge going, and anded up the summer looking like a prospect to be pretty optimistic about.   

He's hit 3 HR's in the last 10 days.  The one yesterday (I think) was said to be over the scoreboard.  Like Vitters, his walk rate has taken a limited but perhaps real incremental small-step.

While many here had hopes for Wood, and davep insisted that Sappelt was a "professional hitter," it seemed to me that Torreyes was likely the key played in the Marshall trade, and his recent improvement is reinforcing that belief.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 30, 2012, 09:49:08 am
Richard Jones hit 24 HR's last year for Peoria.  He has zero for Daytona.  Although he still has plenty of serious batting-practice power. 

Richard Jones also just got released.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/06/minor-league-transactions-june-19-24/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2012, 09:56:37 am
It is great to see Josh Vitters keep hitting.

He'd be my 3rd baseman if I were Dale Sveum.

So you would pencil Vitters into your lineup at third, even when he is not on the team?  Not even on the 40 man roster?

Don't you think that would sort of waste a lineup spot?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2012, 10:01:10 am
“Obviously I’ve been striking out too much, so I’m cutting down on my swing and trying to be more of who I am,” Jackson, 23, said. “I was trying to be someone probably greater than who I am, and who I am is a player I think can help a team win, with the speed I have.”

Comments like that scream out for follow up questions.  It will be interesting to see how is performance changes, if he indeed is changing his approach.  It would also be interesting to know how he feels he was "trying to be someone probably greater than who (he is)," and also whether that effort was generated internally or was the result of coaching suggestions and came externally.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 30, 2012, 10:08:46 am
Jes, Vitters is on the 40-man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 30, 2012, 10:10:14 am
Richard Jones hit 24 HR's last year for Peoria.  He has zero for Daytona.  Although he still has plenty of serious batting-practice power. 

Man.  Craig has destroyed another career.  First it was Nitro Nic, who he rode constantly until he finally gave up the game.  Now, he conducts such a slander campaign against Richard Jones that the Cubs have no choice but to release him.

Some of those dutch guys have mean streaks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 30, 2012, 10:13:56 am
While many here had hopes for Wood, and davep insisted that Sappelt was a "professional hitter," it seemed to me that Torreyes was likely the key played in the Marshall trade, and his recent improvement is reinforcing that belief.

DaveP does have some hopes for Wood, and he did say that Sappelt was a "Professional hitter", but he also said that he believed that Torreyez was the key player in that trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2012, 10:22:28 am
Jes, Vitters is on the 40-man roster.

If so, I stand corrected.

He certainly isn't on the 25 man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on June 30, 2012, 10:23:15 am
Trey Martin bumped up to Boise. Wonder how he and Dunston will find playing time in CF. Cleary once (if???) Almora is signed he'll spend a few days in AZ then go to Peoria.  Well, maybe not clearly, but seems likely.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on June 30, 2012, 10:23:45 am
DaveP does have some hopes for Wood, and he did say that Sappelt was a "Professional hitter", but he also said that he believed that Torreyez was the key player in that trade.

Oh, what would you know about what davep said?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 30, 2012, 10:27:17 am
Wood was clearly the primary target in the trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 30, 2012, 11:01:21 am
Torreyes had a .237 BABIP going into yesterday's game.  Likely some bad luck in there, but that's got to reflect just some weak contact.  That hasn't been true recently, and of course he was playing some with a sore wrist early for some time which may have contributed.  We'll see in future whether he's just a weak-contact low BABIP guy, or whether in future his contact will be good and that bad stretch past has no predictive impact for future contact. 

Marshall has been really good, has continued to be really good, and was valued as really good by the Reds enough to give him a very substantial contract extension.  Wood has somewhat limited stuff.  So whatever the values were, I don't think Wood was even close to being the dominant value in that trade, or a case where it's mostly Wood with a couple of throw-ins.  I think Torreyes was a very significant part and was the exciting piece.
 
For example, maybe Wood was 50%, Torreyes 40%, and Sappelt 10%.  Or Wood 40% and Torreyes 50%, or whatever.  But Torreyes was certainly a very, very, very important and valued component.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 30, 2012, 11:12:23 am
From what I've seen of Wood, he has great potential.  A 25 year old lefty starter with a live arm and a feel for pitching who has plenty of room to improve his command.  I can't imagine that Torreyes was viewed as having nearly equal value.  That doesn't mean he was a "throw in", but simply that he was a relatively minor element in the deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 30, 2012, 11:34:00 am
I agree with Play.  Torreyes is an interesting prospect, sure.  Anyone young minor leaguer with his ability to make contact is someone you want.  But Wood was a semi-established 24 year old LH starter at the time with 5 years of control left.  A cheap, young pitcher who has already shown he can succeed at least as a back end starter (and maybe significantly more) in the majors is more valuable than a second baseman who has been good in low-A.

That trade probably gets made even if the Reds just offer Wood with a couple of non-prospects.  It doesn't get close if they offer Torreyes and a couple of non-prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 30, 2012, 12:05:27 pm
Dittos to br and P2. Love me some Torreyes, but Wood was the key.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on June 30, 2012, 12:09:25 pm
Ditto to br, P2, and tico
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on June 30, 2012, 12:12:10 pm
Bruce Miles ‏@BruceMiles2112
Soler deal expected to be finalized today. #Cubs
Expand
 Reply  Retweet  Favorite
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on June 30, 2012, 12:17:12 pm
Exactly
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 30, 2012, 12:39:29 pm
The key to the trade is whomever turns out to be the best player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 30, 2012, 12:42:08 pm
I agree with Play.  Torreyes is an interesting prospect, sure.  ...But Wood was a semi-established 24 year old LH starter ... at least as a back end starter (and maybe significantly more) in the majors is more valuable than a second baseman who has been good in low-A.

That trade probably gets made even if the Reds just offer Wood with a couple of non-prospects.  It doesn't get close if they offer Torreyes and a couple of non-prospects.

I think Torreyes factored as more than "interesting" and as more than a frosting added-value guy that Hoyer would have made for Wood alone.   I guess I also somewhat disagree that Wood was an established starter with chance for more.  He wasn't established enough to be an intended starter on the Reds, and he wasn't established enough to be given a Cubs job, he was only established enough to be a competitor.  I think Torreyes was a very important, valued, and critical piece.  They both were. 

Tampa woudn't have given Garza without Lee.  They wouldn't have trade Garza without Archer.  Both were critical.  I'm not suggesting that Torreyes was as equally essential, but I'm feeling like you guys are trivializing his importance to that deal.   

disagree that the trade gets done with Wood and a couple of non-prospects. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 30, 2012, 02:43:38 pm
Quote
Quote:
Dillon Maples (@dsmaples)
6/29/12 8:01 PM
My back....is....hurting....


(@Vinestal)
6/29/12 8:05 PM
@dsmaples is that why you haven't started a game this year? that sucks, hope it gets better soon. I'm looking forward to seeing u in action.

Quote:
Dillon Maples (@dsmaples)
6/30/12 2:18 PM
@Vinestal yeah and I can't wait to get out there


So I guess his back has been his issue. I've not really seen this reported elsewhere so I figured it was worth posting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 30, 2012, 02:45:57 pm
The guy is 19 and he's already having major back problems.  That doesn't sound too good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 30, 2012, 03:06:46 pm
What a sap!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2012, 03:54:37 pm
Late arriving DSL box from Friday.


Arajuo: 5-7-3-3-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_29_dyarok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 30, 2012, 04:53:26 pm
What a sap!

Groooooooan.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 30, 2012, 05:20:07 pm

More Maples stuff. 

Quote
davell wrote:
No, that's just what it is currently. He's had two different arm issues since January as well. He just got a clean MRI on his elbow last month or so. Then had a slight setback after that. Started throwing, no clue what his exact status is. A couple weeks ago he said he'd be pitching his first game sometime in July. Who knows?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2012, 05:28:01 pm
He's a Cubs pitching prospect. It is his destiny to be injured.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on June 30, 2012, 06:34:09 pm
Tarp wins battle with grounds crew

http://deadspin.com/5922566/i-am-a-little-worried-to-beon-the-electronics-thunder-storm-terrorizes-professional-baseball-grounds-crew (http://deadspin.com/5922566/i-am-a-little-worried-to-beon-the-electronics-thunder-storm-terrorizes-professional-baseball-grounds-crew)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2012, 08:13:15 pm
Lake: played 3B; 1-4, K, 2 E

Jokisch: 7-7-2-2-1-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_30_biraax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 30, 2012, 08:18:53 pm
Wood/Torreyes/Sappelt

55/35/10
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on June 30, 2012, 09:01:31 pm
Whatever the Cubs are paying Mike MacDougal to pitch for Iowa is way way way way too much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 30, 2012, 09:03:02 pm
This has been true of every team he's ever pitched for.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2012, 09:31:58 pm
Szczur: 0-4, 2 K

Burke: 4-3-2-1-4-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_30_dunafa_dbcafa_1


Baez: 1-4

Rosscup: 2-1-0-0-0-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_30_peoafx_wisafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 30, 2012, 09:35:03 pm
Wood/Torreyes/Sappelt

55/35/10

Wood/Torreyes/Sappelt

30/50/20
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on June 30, 2012, 09:37:35 pm
Purple, Dave.  Purple.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on June 30, 2012, 09:51:06 pm
75/15/10.

Seriously, some of you give way too much value to an A ball prospect who, according to at least one evaluator, was the Cubs' 19th best prospect before the season: http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/1/6/2688854/chicago-cubs-top-20-prospects-for-2012 (http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/1/6/2688854/chicago-cubs-top-20-prospects-for-2012).   

Coming into the season, he was a second (or third) tier prospect in the low minors.  And Wood had a 4.18 ERA in 208 MLB innings, which was right around league average in 2010-2011.  It's not even close.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2012, 09:52:02 pm
Jackson: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI, SB, BB, 2 K

Vitters: 1-2, 2 BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_30_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on June 30, 2012, 10:05:35 pm
Interesting Rosscup.  He'd been a very effective pitcher prior to his injury.  Did he have TJ, or what?  Would be interesting if he bounced back and was good. Lefty relievers are useful. 

Burke's had a hard time for a while.  I wonder if going to so many innings of full-season ball is just wearing him down. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on June 30, 2012, 10:23:47 pm
Vitters is Bondsian.

And I can live with a 50% k-rate from Jackson if he keeps slugging 1.500
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on June 30, 2012, 10:24:59 pm
If Jackson can ever get his Ks down to a reasonable level, without too adversely affecting the rest of his game, he's going to be something.  Of his 76 hits, 36 are extra base hits (incl 11 HRs), plus he has 15 SB (only 4 CS), so this is a guy who puts himself into a position to score an awful lot of the time (aside from driving in other guys). Put this together with his good defense in the OF and his charismatic personality and he could be a whole lot of fun to watch for a long time. If he can get his Ks down a bit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on June 30, 2012, 10:40:43 pm
Purple, Dave.  Purple.

No.  That is pretty much how I saw it.  Someone referred to Wood as semiestablished.  I would have referred to him as semifailed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on June 30, 2012, 10:42:15 pm
DaveP, a real "the glass is half empty" kind of guy.  The quintessential Cubs fan.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on June 30, 2012, 10:43:34 pm
I will agree that Brett Jackson needs more seasoning and maybe a good bit more.

I know he's an on base guy and not a slugger so he is more apt to take pitches but his K rate is Adam Dunn esque.

There's no way that'll fly playing every day at Wrigley.

I think Tony Campana's time is now anyway.

If we didnt have him I'd be more apt to bring up Jackson but seeing that we do there's no need to rush him.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on June 30, 2012, 11:18:35 pm
Candelario: 3-5, 2B, 2 RBI, K

Arias: 5-9-5-5-0-4  - (4-4-0-0-0-4, minus the 3rd inning)



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_30_spoasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2012, 12:15:57 am
Vogelbach: 3-4, 2B, RBI, BB

Penalver: 3-5, 2B, 3 RBI, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_30_royrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 01, 2012, 12:18:36 am
With all due respect to AZPhil, those EST stats are looking pretty useless.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2012, 12:22:01 am
Emeterio: 2-5, RBI, SB, CS, 2 K, E

Alcala: 2-5, GS, 5 RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_30_dwsrok_dcurok_1



Malave: 1-4, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_06_30_dchrok_dgirok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 01, 2012, 12:28:28 am
Bruno has a .286 batting average along with 0 BB's, but he has a .342 OBP.

I think we talked about his high HBP total at Virginia, and it sounds like that's continuing right along at Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2012, 02:15:45 am
Quote
Added Buckner: “If they hit a home run in batting practice, the next pitch they’ve got to hit it up the middle or the other way. … If you practice the right way, it’s more boring, but you’ve got to practice what makes you better.”

The message has come through loud and clear to Candelario.

“No, I’m not looking for home runs,” he said. “I’m just looking for good contact. I don’t think about home runs, I think about line drives.”

Buckner said even at the major league level there aren’t many hitters who concentrate on hitting home runs.

“I had one little streak,” Buckner said. “Out of 20 years, I had one little two-week streak where I was feeling pretty cocky about hitting home runs.”

But he said baseball will humble a hitter in a hurry.

“Candelario’s gotten into that a little bit,” Buckner said. “That’s what happens, that’s baseball. You have a little streak and then you get a little too cocky.”

Still, Candelario has impressed Buckner more often than not in the early stages of this season.

“He didn’t swing that well in spring training,” Buckner said. “I mean, he did OK, but he didn’t show a lot of power. But he’s been practicing well, and when you’re a switch-hitter with power from both sides that’s a pretty good commodity.”


http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/07/01/2175222/boise-off-to-a-home-run-swinging.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 01, 2012, 05:37:59 am
Burke's had a hard time for a while.  I wonder if going to so many innings of full-season ball is just wearing him down.

Possible, but he also had 6 K's yesterday in 4 innings, which doesn't sound like someone who has a tired arm.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 01, 2012, 09:03:32 am
Bruno has a .286 batting average along with 0 BB's, but he has a .342 OBP.

I think we talked about his high HBP total at Virginia, and it sounds like that's continuing right along at Boise.

3 HBP in 38 plate appearances at Boise.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=bruno-001ste
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2012, 04:29:20 pm
Baez: 1-3, HBP

Geiger: 2-3, HBP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_01_kccafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 01, 2012, 06:44:30 pm
I've only seen Wood in spring training, and on his 4-HR game.

Now that he's been good, what's the scouting report on he's doing it?  Is it sustainable?  How fast does he actually work these days?  88-91 normally, with a few 92's and 93's mixed in?  Does it have much movement?  And for now his curveball is locked in and he's throwing that for strikes? 

His career record is as a gopher-ball guy, so I expect that will always be something of a factor.  I suspect on days when he doesn't give up HR's, he'll probably have a lot of good ones. 

He's been a low-walk guy in the minors, and in these recent games.  His walks are up on the season, but if his walks are down and he keeps his HR's down, he'll be good.

Heh, jes was pretty sure that Wood would manifest arm problems, and thought Volstad would too.  Both have seemed to be fine. 

Would be great if Wood could be a long-term good starter.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2012, 07:17:23 pm
Szczur: 1-3, 2B, RBI, BB, K, Assist

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_01_lakafa_dbcafa_1


Struck: 5 IP, 1 ER

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_01_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 01, 2012, 07:32:20 pm
Alcantara may be trying to get into the trying-to-get-more-disciplined mode.  He's gotten 3 walks in the last ten games. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 01, 2012, 08:45:40 pm
Since Jackson has decided to change his approach, his new approach seems much like the old.  In 8 PA since, 2 walks, 3 K's, and 3 XBH, one of them being a HR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 01, 2012, 09:10:33 pm
Heh, jes was pretty sure that Wood would manifest arm problems, and thought Volstad would too.  Both have seemed to be fine.

I was wrong.

It had to happen eventually.

Volstad may actually have some arm problems from over-use, but it certainly would appear that Wood does not, and neither even smelled the DL by the end of June.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 01, 2012, 10:18:37 pm
Since Jackson has decided to change his approach, his new approach seems much like the old.  In 8 PA since, 2 walks, 3 K's, and 3 XBH, one of them being a HR.

One game may just possibly be a little early to reach any conclusions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 01, 2012, 10:20:24 pm
Jackson: 2-5, 2B, 3B, 2 RBI, SB, K, E

Vitters: 3-6, 2 2B, RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_01_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 01, 2012, 10:32:33 pm
Vogelbach 2 for 2 so far today.  With his BA almost .500, and Shoulder's under .200, I wouldn't be surprised if the two changed places soon.

But there is no hurry.  I would prefer that they go really slow with Vogelbach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2012, 12:22:39 am
Vogelbach: 4-5, 3B, HR, 3 RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_01_athrok_cubrok_1



Candelario: 2-5, K

Pugliese: 4-2-0-0-0-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_01_boiasx_triasx_1


No DSL games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2012, 01:44:13 am
Couple notes from AzPhil:


Quote
Although he has been an AZL double machine, Vogelbach had not hit a HR going into tonight's game. But he made up for it by blasting a 420+ foot HR to the right of the light-standard in right-centerfield in the bottom of the 5th.


Quote
Recently-signed 20-year old Cuban mega-defector Jorge Soler ($30M nine-year contract) is in uniform and is taking BP with the AZL Cubs, but he isn't quite ready for game action.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 02, 2012, 07:12:41 am
Nice to see Vogelbach with a HR.  Tons of strength/power, and seems to have the potential for good contact and good discipline.  I hope over the long haul or with time and learning, that he gets enough lift to put a lot over the wall.  If he hits a lot of HR's, the sky's the limit as a hitter.  HOpefully this is the first of many.  I know he hit one last summer and I think he hit one in XST as well. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 02, 2012, 07:35:25 am
How is a 20 year old, top 10 prospect (equivalent) not quite game ready?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 02, 2012, 07:36:48 am
Ronnie Cedeno is explaining the rules to him.  Some are really new.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 02, 2012, 08:09:07 am
Vitters is now at .860 OPS, with a .350 OBP. A few points shy of .300 for average.  Not long ago that I was wondering if he could reach and then sustain the .770 OPS cutoff that's been his over-under for the last several years.  No question about that now.  .330 seemed like a round-number OBP target (he'd not done that since the summer spent mostly at Boise).  Now way beyond.  .300 BA, .850 or .900 OPS, .330 or .350 OBP, .500 slugging, those are a lot of nice round numbers.

At least three of his AB's last night were first-pitch, including popping out a couple of times with a bunch of guys on base.  So it's not like he's grinding long AB's consistently, although sometimes.  But he's sure been in a groove.  Very fun. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 02, 2012, 08:20:02 am
How is a 20 year old, top 10 prospect (equivalent) not quite game ready?

I read that as not being "game ready" in the same way that, say, David DeJesus or Matt Garza wasn't game ready on February 25.  Soler hasn't played competitively in over a year, has he? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2012, 08:29:59 am
Quote
Soler hasn't played competitively in over a year, has he? 

That's what they say.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 02, 2012, 08:41:45 am
Quote from: Baseball America
Chicago Cubs

The Cubs have shown interest in various players in Latin America, but it seems like Dominican shortstop Frandy de la Rosa is high on their priority list. The suspension of Dominican righthander Juan Carlos Paniagua ends on July 19. He is one player the Cubs have been tied to and he could cost more than the $1.1 million the Yankees were going to give him in 2011. The Cubs have poured money into the Cuban market as well with the signing of Jorge Soler becoming official this week, so it shouldn't be a surprise if they throw some of their international funds that way either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 02, 2012, 09:23:01 am
That's what they say.

Unless they check the games he played as Hector Garcia.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 02, 2012, 09:58:56 am
Unless they check the games he played as Hector Garcia.

So he was a "player to be n amed later"?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 02, 2012, 10:00:39 am
How is a 20 year old, top 10 prospect (equivalent) not quite game ready?

Because he hasn't played in a couple of months?  He may not even have been doing a lot of conditioning or competitive batting practice.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 02, 2012, 10:02:06 am
And my next question would be "Why the hell not?"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 02, 2012, 10:03:04 am
And my next question would be "Why the hell not?"

Because he's 20 years old.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 02, 2012, 10:11:51 am
Just the other day Hoyer mentioned how Soler's people had done a good job getting him into game situations/games in the DR during the limbo period when they were awaiting his papers. But also said he (Soler) would get his own mini version of spring training:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/videogallery/70800450/Sports/Video-GM-Hoyer-on-Cubs-signing-Soler
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on July 02, 2012, 10:47:57 am
The Trib needs to teach its reporters how to use a camera for video.  At the very least give them a monopod.  They ought to hand out seasick medication for anybody watching their wiggly videos.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 02, 2012, 01:05:19 pm
The Cubs have officially signed Frandy De La Rosa for $700K.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/07/cubs-sign-no-19-international-prospect-frandy-de-la-rosa/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on July 02, 2012, 01:11:01 pm
Very nice.  Le's add some arms too please.

I understand the draft and the budget implications there, but how does it work with the international signings?  What is the Cubs international budget?  Can they exceed that budget (I believe they were allowed to go over the draft budget by less than 5%)? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on July 02, 2012, 01:15:54 pm
$2.9 million with a 5% overage before penalities kick in.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 02, 2012, 01:20:38 pm
For this year, everybody has a 2.9 budget.  You can go 5% over, no penalty, 10% over a significant "tax" (like 75% tax on the overage?).  Beyond 10% then you get limited next year (nobody over $500K), beyond 15% next year you can't sign anybody over $250K. 

AS with draft, I think there are some other factors.  Anybody under $7.5K or something doesn't count.  For guys under $50K, the highest six don't count.  So if you sign ten $50K guys, only $200K counts against your budget. 

BA has a list (http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/07/top-20-international-prospects-tracker/), and mlb has another article reporting a bunch of signings that BA didn't have (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120702&content_id=34319274&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb&tcid=tw_article_34319274_

From BA's top 20, the top 5 have already signed, and between BA and mlb at least 13 of the top 20 have already signed. 

Some guys aren't eligible yet.  The Cubs were said to be one of the teams interested in a big LHP from Brazil who doesn't turn 16 till the end of the month.  Another pitcher is ineligible till later in the month (I think he'd signed under a fraudulent age or name or something earlier?) 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 02, 2012, 01:29:21 pm
Quote from: mlb.com
Starting in 2013-14, the pools will be based on each team's winning percentage in the prior season, with pools ranging from approximately $1.7 million to $4.8 million.

With the way the Cubs are going this year, we ought to have a truckload of money to spend on international prospects next year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on July 02, 2012, 01:31:35 pm
Thanks Craig (and CUBluejays).  The Brazilian kid seems very intriguing.  I remember hearing earlier this year that a player from the Blue Jays that got promoted to the majors became the first Brazilian born baseball player to play in the big leagues.  Seeing how good some of their athletes are in other sports, signing some players from Brazil would be a really good idea. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 02, 2012, 02:22:56 pm
The Cubs have officially signed Frandy De La Rosa for $700K.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/07/cubs-sign-no-19-international-prospect-frandy-de-la-rosa/

Can't hoit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 02, 2012, 02:47:06 pm
Not sure Frandy sounds all that enticing for 700k...would rather see the money spent on upside.  He doesn't have power, isn't quite an average runner, and won't stay at short...anyone wtih a ba subscription care to report their scouting report?  Here is one from chicagocubsonline, although theirs borrrows from ba

According to Baseball America, Frandy De La Rosa (6-foot-1, 180 pounds) does things that scouts like but also has a few question marks. De La Rosa reportedly has a smooth swing from both sides of the plate and can handle the bat equally from the left and right side. He possesses a simple, short swing with quick hands and has shown the ability to barrel ball up. De La Rosa is seen more as a line drive hitter right now and not much of a power threat.

De La Rosa is not quite an average runner according to Baseball America and while he has shown improvement, he does not have the range or arm for shortstop. De La Rosa is seen as a potential offensive-oriented second baseman but where he plays could change as he develops.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 02, 2012, 03:02:15 pm
Here's the scouting report on De La Rosa from MLB.Com's Jonathan Mayo:

The switch-hitter has a good feel for hitting and has good hands on defense, but he will need to continue to develop his tools and build strength if he wants to stay in the infield. For now, his makeup and ability to hit from both sides of the plate are what scouts find the most attractive about the young infielder. Scouts have praised his soft hands but have expressed some concern about his running and throwing abilities.

De La Rosa is from Elias Pina, near the Haitian border, and moved to Boca Chica because his mother believed the larger city could provide more opportunities for her son develop as a baseball player. Educated and grounded, De La Rosa’s good makeup works in his favor. He is considered mature for his age and could develop into a leader.

A star in the Dominican Prospect League, De La Rosa was a member of the league’s All-Star travel squad that played games and put on showcases at big league sites during Spring Training.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 02, 2012, 03:12:45 pm
I'm comfortable with the assumption that the Cubs believe Frandy is worth their $700K investment. Their scouting and other resources in the D.R. are highly rated. They didn't just sign him so they could have a BA Top 20 prospect in the fold. I just hope he never decides to name one of sons Ftodd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 02, 2012, 03:15:03 pm
Quote
Quote:
• There are players with louder tools than Dominican shortstop Frandy de la Rosa, but he will draw interest for his short, simple swing from both sides of the plate. De la Rosa, a 16-year-old switch-hitter who trains with Valentin Monero and plays in the Dominican Prospect League, has shown quick hands at the plate and feel for hitting with gap power from his 6-foot-1, 180-pound frame. De la Rosa isn't much of a runner and his arm is probably a little light for shortstop, so he could be an offensive-oriented second baseman if everything clicks.

When they open their scouting capsule emphasizing the lack of "loud" tools, and lacks arm, lacks speed, not notably powerful, you wonder what the appeal is. 

Reminds me a little of Almora.  Pre-draft, Almora seemed boring low-ceiling safe:  wasn't fast (no Corey), wasn't notably strong (no Harvey or Correa), no super arm (no Harvey or Glanville).  But they loved Almora as a true-blue hitter, and thought his other tools were decent/solid enough without any "loud" non-hitting tool. 

Obviously this is a $0.7 guy rather than the $4.0 or whatever that Almora will get, so totally on a different plateau.  But like Almora this sounds kind of like prioritizing a good true-blue hitter.  I'd think a 180-pound 6'1" 16-year-old HS sophomore would project to add significant strength/size.  So I assume they figure that if he really can hit, he'll eventually have the strength so that some HR's will come with the package.  The educated/grounded/makeup/leader qualities also seem to mirror the Almora profile. 

I like toolsy guys, I admit.  But when it comes to cases, if a guy can really hit, he can win with good but not exceptional "other" tools.  Guys who have great tools but are iffy on the hitting side, they don't that often work out.  Heh, may as well hope, eh? 

A concern is that the Cubs just don't have good scouting in Latin America.  I assume McLeod is still going largely off his scouts.  The scouts obviously loved Concepcion, and he's been terrible thus far.  Acosta last year, he looks like he can't hit much.  Malava, it doesn't look early on that he's very promising defensively, and he hasn't hit much at all either.  It may be that we just don't have the best scouts in the world down there?  I hope that's changing, and of course that the guys from last year do get it figured out and start to produce.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 02, 2012, 03:51:41 pm
Obviously, part of his appeal is his interesting first name "Frandy."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 02, 2012, 03:56:57 pm
I'm not sure that the Cubs scouts "loved" Concepcion.  He signed in a lopsided market for about one tenth of what Soler, Cespedes or Puig signed for.

When you are trying to restock your system in a totally free market, you might have to pay more than you think he is worth, because he is better than the alternatives.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2012, 08:31:08 pm
Matt Cerda back in Daytona: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI, SB


Francescon: 6-5-3-3-0-5


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_lakafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2012, 09:32:04 pm
Baez: 0-3, 2 K, HBP

Rosario: 7-10-6-4-0-7


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_kccafx_peoafx_1


Lake: 2-5, RBI, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2012, 10:07:47 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 2 K

Vitters: 2-4, 2B, RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 02, 2012, 10:15:15 pm
Vitters now at .301 for the BA and his OPS should be about .870 now.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 02, 2012, 10:54:46 pm
So far tonight, Vogelbach is 2 for 3 with another home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 02, 2012, 11:00:51 pm
Wow.  Vitters and Vogelbach have been awesome.  Love to see Vogelbach with the power.  2HR, 3 walks, 4 K's in 37 AB.  That's some good contact hitting.  Fantastic. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 02, 2012, 11:03:03 pm
DSL

*



Torrez: 5-2-1-1-0-4

Malave: 2-5, 2B, 2 RBI, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_dgirok_dchrok_1


Emeterio: 1-4, 2 SB, BB, K, 2 E

Alcala: 1-4, RBI, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_dcurok_dwsrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2012, 12:02:04 am
Vogelbach: 2-5, HR, 2 RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_cubrok_rngrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2012, 12:25:26 am
Amaya: 3-5, 3B, 2 RBI, SB

Simpson: 1-2/3 -2-3-2-3-2, WP, HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_boiasx_triasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 03, 2012, 12:34:17 am
It's really fun to see Vitters this hot.

Fwiw, if we had drafted a college bat last year and he were putting up these kind of numbers at AAA right now, we'd be thrilled. Vitters is only 22. Yeah, he still has a ton of work to do, but there's reason for hope.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 03, 2012, 08:05:54 am
I watched Vitters on Saturday and Sunday (at least until Nashville started scoring runs right and left and it was 100 degrees outside). 

Defensively, one thing I will say is he is pretty stiff and unathletic.  There was one ball that went past him for a double that I think a lot of third basemen would have been able to make a diving play on, but he only made a slight lunge at it.  There were a couple of other times he tried to dive and couldn't get to the ball where I think a lot of third basemen would have made a play on, possibly without even diving. 

He seemed to do fine with what he could get to, but he doesn't look like someone who will ever win a Gold Glove, even if he quits making errors. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 03, 2012, 08:33:41 am
Wonder if Vogelbach will be able to watch fireworks on the 4th in Boise -- or at least the huge Idaho celebration of Bastille Day on the 14th. No reason to keep him in Arizona much longer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 03, 2012, 03:03:59 pm
DSL
Malave: 2-5, 2B, 2 RBI, K, E
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_dgirok_dchrok_1
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_02_dcurok_dwsrok_1

Malave has picked it up after a slow start.  He's up to .250 now, and has gotten some doubles (5 doubles in 20 hits).  15 K in 80 AB, so he doesn't seem like he's getting killed and is grossly overmatched.  9 walks, not a hacker.  8/25 recently.  I'd thought he'd started pretty bad, but he's basically one big game from solid numbers. 

I'd also thought that Marcano was going hitless every game, but like Malave he's doing much better than I thought.  Like Malave, he's also at .250, in his case with 6 XBH in 21 hits.)  Like Malave 13K/84 AB is not bad at all, quite good actually.  He's got 19 walks in 84 AB, wow. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2012, 09:44:32 pm
Szczur: 0-3, 2 BB

Kirk: 4 IP, 5 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_03_lakafa_dbcafa_1


McNutt: 4-7-2-2-3-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_03_tenaax_cngaax_1


Baez: 0-3, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_03_kccafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2012, 10:31:22 pm
Jackson: 1-4, SB, HBP, 2 K

Vitters: 1-3, SF, 2 RBI, BB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_03_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 03, 2012, 11:58:48 pm
Candelario: 2-3, RBI, BB, E

Dunston: 0-4, 2 K,  (.204 overall)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_03_boiasx_triasx_1



Vogelbach: 1-5, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_03_cubrok_brrrok_1


Emeterio: 3-4, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_03_dcurok_drdrok_1


DSL 2:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_03_dwarok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 04, 2012, 08:44:02 am
Encarnacion has walked about 20% of the time!  Gotta improve his aggressiveness.  Or maybe not, as his slugging % is .605.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 04, 2012, 05:18:22 pm
Brett Jackson has been hitting leadoff

6  Amezaga
8  Sappelt
4  Cardenas
5  Vitters 
9  Jackson
2  Castillo
3  DeWitt
DH Esposito
7   Tolbert 

1  Lopez


Doug Davis, 4-1, 2.51, pitches for Omaha tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 04, 2012, 05:24:29 pm
Interesting that they've moved Jackson into a traditional "RBI spot".  A subtle encouragement to "swing the bat"?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 04, 2012, 05:24:57 pm
Looks like it to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2012, 05:32:51 pm
Does anyone know what percentage of strike outs for Jackson are swinging strike outs?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 04, 2012, 07:05:45 pm
Has Trey McNutt reached "non-prospect" status?

Discuss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 04, 2012, 08:05:43 pm
No.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 04, 2012, 08:58:02 pm
Baez: 1-4, RBI, 2 K

Jensen: 6-6-2-1-0-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_04_burafx_peoafx_1


Szczur: 0-5, 3 K

Whitenack: 3-1/3 -4-5-4-2-5, 2 HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_04_dbcafa_dunafa_1



Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_04_jaxaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 04, 2012, 09:00:03 pm
Acosta: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, K, 2 E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_04_dchrok_dwarok_1



Rodriguez: 5-1-0-0-2-4  - (1.16 ERA)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_04_drdrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 04, 2012, 10:27:43 pm
Jackson: 2-4, 2 RBI, 2 SB, K

Vitters: 1-4, BB, 2 K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_04_omaaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 04, 2012, 11:42:05 pm
Shoulders: 3-4, 2B, 2 RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_04_triasx_boiasx_1


Mesa off
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2012, 03:53:52 am
Article on Bijan Rademacher:

http://www.idahopress.com/sports/boise-hawks-better-off-with-bijan/article_42f1c9ba-c675-11e1-8c6f-001a4bcf887a.html


Dunston Jr. has moved to leftfield as Trey Martin takes over center.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 05, 2012, 10:45:01 am
Baseball America has their mid-season Top 50 Prospects List out.  Javier Baez (#25) is the only Cub I believe.  Is Anthony Rizzo not eligible for some reason? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 05, 2012, 10:49:42 am
I think Rizzo was only about 5-10 PA away from losing his rookie status when he was called up.

EDIT: Just looked it up...players lose rookie status at 130 AB, and Rizzo had 128 AB with the Padres last year.  So he lost his status as a "prospect" in his first game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 05, 2012, 11:48:36 am
Rademacher's fast start as a hitter may not really be helping him long-term.   The scouting reports indicated that scouts saw more potential as a LHP, where he'd thrown 95 mph.  He's primarily a corner outfielder who had some JC power but doesn't seem to promise real big-league power.  ("he’s got a little sneaky power in there" doesn't sound quite what you want for a big-league corner outfielder.) 

But he's wanted to hit and that's what he's doing now.  Probably easier to get a guy to convert if he's hitting .150 and on his way to getting released than if he's hitting .300 and getting pretty regular playing time, even if it's in a utility role.  I sometimes think that Kyler Burke cost himself two years when he had that good year at Peoria. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 05, 2012, 12:00:23 pm
It may be that the Cubs got him for a lower price by promising to make him a position player.  In the back of their mind might be the plan to move him to the mound, as they did with Burke, if things don't work out well in the field.

I believe there is one or two other kids in the draft where they might try to use the same tactics.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 05, 2012, 12:29:47 pm
That's what I was thinking too.  We think your future is in pitching.  I want to hit.  Will you sign for slot?  If I can play, but not if you make me pitch.

You get the guy because you'll let him work as a hitter.  But you may know, even if he doesn't, that the sooner he gives up hitting the better his chances to become a major leaguer. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 05, 2012, 04:17:32 pm
Quote
VIT CAN HIT: PCL All-Star 3B Josh Vitters was 1-for-4 with a walk last night. Vitters has hit safely in six straight games and 16 of his last 17. During this streak, Vitters is batting .431 (28-for-65) with seven doubles, a triple, four homers, 10 runs scored, and 12 RBI. Since the start of this streak on June 16, Vitters is tied for second in the league in total bases (49), ranks third in batting and hits (28), is tied for fourth in extra-base hits (12), and is fifth in slugging percentage (.754). Vitters has not gone hitless in consecutive games since June 3-5 at Oklahoma City.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 05, 2012, 04:22:12 pm
BA Chat on their updated Top 50 prospects . . .

Quote
    James (Australia): Okay let me preface this by saying , I am a massive Cubs fan, but no Josh Vitters, that really doesn't seem fair! He is having by far his best ever professional season hitting .300 at Triple A, finally starting to walk a bit more (22BB) and hit for some good power (13 HR). I mean at least tell me he came into consideration!

Jim Callis: As someone who does our Cubs Top 30 for the Prospect Handbook every year, I talk to people incessantly about Vitters. He has made some progress, but his ceiling is solid regular and the guys on this list have higher ceilings than that. I'm also not sold Vitters could be an everyday third baseman at the big league level. I think you'd want a better defender than that. So no, I can't tell you he even received consideration for the Top 50.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 05, 2012, 04:30:09 pm
If Vitters had been drafted in 2010 as a college junior and was performing similarly in AAA, he'd easily be in the Top 50. BA considers him "old news."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 05, 2012, 04:43:10 pm
I disagree. This is the first time in a long time that he has been anything more than mediocre. His defense is very suspect. The largest knock against him - that his approach is undisciplined - still stands.

Unless he is able to radically transform his approach, he is going to have to hit for lots of power, and just because he's done that for a couple months in AAA doesn't mean it's legit. I'm cautiously optimistic about Vitters, but he's definitely not a top 50 prospect right now. If he does this the rest of the year, including the marginally improved walk rate, then I think his name enters the discussion. But he needs to amass a body of PA's at this level of performance before one can confidently assert that this is a new performative norm, over and against his previous history.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 05, 2012, 05:02:41 pm
I disagree. This is the first time in a long time that he has been anything more than mediocre.

Rather high standards for "mediocre."

Last year at Tennessee, Vitters had an OPS of .770 at age 21.  The OPS was 55th in the ten team league, but higher than any player who was not older than he was.

In 2010 at Daytona, Vitters had an OPS of .795 at age 20.  The OPS would have put him at 25th in the 12 team league if he's had enough AB to qualify, but higher than any qualifying hitter who was not older than he was.

In 2009 at Peoria, Vitters had an OPS of .886 at age 19.  The OPS put him 6th in the 14 team league, but better than any qualifying hitter who was not older than he was.

Just hard to see being the best hitter in his league of any hitter his age, in three straight leagues, being "mediocre."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 05, 2012, 05:21:35 pm
I disagree. This is the first time in a long time that he has been anything more than mediocre. His defense is very suspect. The largest knock against him - that his approach is undisciplined - still stands.

Unless he is able to radically transform his approach, he is going to have to hit for lots of power, and just because he's done that for a couple months in AAA doesn't mean it's legit. I'm cautiously optimistic about Vitters, but he's definitely not a top 50 prospect right now. If he does this the rest of the year, including the marginally improved walk rate, then I think his name enters the discussion. But he needs to amass a body of PA's at this level of performance before one can confidently assert that this is a new performative norm, over and against his previous history.

This.  Vitters is no way a top 50 prospect, not even close.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 05, 2012, 06:09:04 pm
I think Callis' assessment of Vitters is fair.  But I also think that his recent success could be more than a temporary streak and, if that proves to be the case, his ceiling could be higher by the end of the summer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 05, 2012, 08:11:22 pm
Dustin Geiger with his 6th HR in 23 games.  6 HR/6 BB.  He's 20 all season.  Thus far he's kind of in the Baez/Jackson class in terms of being a whiff-a-ton.  But 6HR/24K, that's excellent and you should hit for high average with output like that.  Would be kind of fun to have some guy like that emerge as a serious power hitter with average. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2012, 10:12:24 pm
Szczur: DNP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_05_dbcafa_dunafa_1


Tenn rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2012, 10:33:24 pm
Vitters: 1-4, K

Jackson: DNP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_05_omaaaa_iowaaa_1


Baez: 1-3, SB, K

Rosscup: 3-1-0-0-0-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_05_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 05, 2012, 11:17:25 pm
Amaya: 3-5, RBI

Rademacher: 2-3, 2B, HR, RBI

Arias: 5-1/3 -7-1-1-0-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_05_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 06, 2012, 12:15:26 am
Tenn rained out.
You might want to kill the sound before watching this tarp video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_cX_-xGz24&feature=player_detailpage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_cX_-xGz24&feature=player_detailpage)
Quote
The Tennessee Smokies Grounds Crew tries to keep the tarp on the field during a bad storm that ripped through Smokies Park and East Tennessee on July 5. **Thankfully no one was injured**
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2012, 01:05:37 am
Vogelbach: 0-5, K

Saunders: 5-6, 2B, HR, 3 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_05_cubrok_angrok_1


Malave: 3-3, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_05_dchrok_dptrok_1


Paulino: 5-5-2-2-1-6  -  (36 K's / 2 BB)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_05_drorok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 06, 2012, 09:54:47 am
Between the Boise radio announcer, Mike Safford, and the Idaho Press, we're getting a lot of good stuff on the Hawks

Quote
Gifted with a strong throwing arm, quick swing and fleet feet, Boise Hawks shortstop Marco Hernandez has the makings of a player to watch in the future.

“He’s got all of the tools,” Hawks batting coach Bill Buckner said. “His swings are good, all of his tools are really good, so he should be a really good player.”

There’s only one problem.

“He’s underachieving,” Buckner said.

http://www.idahopress.com/sports/hawks-have-high-hopes-for-hernandez/article_ea401184-c73a-11e1-b98b-001a4bcf887a.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 06, 2012, 01:54:50 pm
Cubs Den

"Tim Wilken and Oneri Fleita are two of the best talent evaluators in the game. "
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 06, 2012, 01:56:50 pm
Cubs Den

"Tim Wilken and Oneri Fleita are two of the best talent evaluators in the game. "

This article was obviously written by Bizarro JeffH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 06, 2012, 06:34:46 pm
Brett Jackson has back spasms and will be out again tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 06, 2012, 08:45:09 pm
Another home run for Geiger tonight.

Also, another error.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 06, 2012, 09:11:39 pm
But who's counting?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2012, 09:14:37 pm
Smokies GM 1:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_06_jaxaax_tenaax_1


Struck: 5-5-3-1-0-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_06_jaxaax_tenaax_2


Alcantara: 3-5, 2B, 3B, HR, 2 RBI

Loosen: 7-3-0-0-1-10  - ( 72 K's, 25 BB )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_06_dbcafa_dunafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 06, 2012, 09:17:02 pm
Loosen's WHIP is 1.000000000000000. 
His ERA is under 3. 
He needs a couple of K's to match his K's to innings. 
He is something of a HR guy, though. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 06, 2012, 09:18:23 pm
Szczur is in a slump.  Average back down to .273, OPS back in the .760's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2012, 09:19:19 pm
DSL

*

Acosta: 0-3, SB, 2 BB, 3 K, Assist, played LF


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_06_dptrok_dchrok_1


Emeterio: 1-4, HR, RBI, 2 K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_06_dcurok_drorok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 06, 2012, 09:53:19 pm
Vitters with a double and 2 BBs so far tonight. And Jay Jackson with another good relief outing. Now up to 27 innings pitched as a reliever with 9 walks and 33 Ks. Fools gold, most likely, but can he be any worse than the collection of cast-offs currently on the MLB roster?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2012, 10:04:29 pm
Baez: 2-4, K

Geiger: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, 3 E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_06_burafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 06, 2012, 11:11:32 pm
Vitters: 1-3, 2B, 2 BB (IBB)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_06_omaaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2012, 12:11:38 am
Vogelbach: 1-5, HR, 2 RBI, BB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_06_cubrok_giarok_1



Candelario: 2-5, 2B, SB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_06_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2012, 04:26:05 am
I just opened my fridge and saw Dillon Maples on the milk carton.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 07, 2012, 10:01:11 am
Boise highlights from Friday night.

Quote
After some Memorial Stadium magic on Thursday night, the Hawks were in position on Friday to do the same – weasling out of a jam in the 10th and it looked like Bryce Shafer was going to do the same in the 11th – before “The Call” broke Boise’s back.  With runners and second and third and two outs, the righty coaxed Francisco Sosa to ground to third, where Jeimer Candelario inexplicably tried to tag Yafistel Roja going by instead of throwing to first for the force out.  However, in trying to tag Roja, the runner ran at least five feet into the infield grass (sorta like a Little League play) and then back to the third base bag.  The umpire crew ruled everyone safe  – which exploded the ticking timebomb that was Mark Johnson (you can watch the play about 3/4 of the way through tonight’s highlights.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7C0mOqZIW88&feature=player_detailpage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7C0mOqZIW88&feature=player_detailpage)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 07, 2012, 10:07:01 am
More from Mike Safford in Boise

Quote
MJ was subsequently ejected – which was tough because the exact same call went against the Hawks in Tri-City (on a bunt by Marco Hernandez), with this calling looking much more obvious than the one on Hernandez.

One must remember – calls will go for a team and go against a team.  Things all even out in the end – as for instance a ball hit by Jarod Berggren in the 10th looked fair that would have been a two-run single, but it was ruled a foul ball and the Hawks got out of trouble.

THE GOOD – Bijan Rademacher extended his hit streak to seven, while Candelario had his nine multi-hit game.  Mike Heesch fanned four batters in two innings of work, and James Pugliese was in position for his first win before the bullpen could not hold it.

THE BAD – Trey Martin and Shawon Dunston continue to struggle, as Martin ended a 1-for-20 slump with a bunt single, while Dunston couldn’t get a sacrifice bunt down and was picked off to end the game (he is in an 0-for-15 slump).  With the loss, Boise is now 7-15 on the season, equaling their worst start through 22 games in affiliated franchise history.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on July 07, 2012, 03:54:12 pm
With the minor league season more than half-over, its interesting to take a look at how everyone is doing.  Here is a list of prospects along with half-season grades for their offensive performance.   Historically, players with full season grades of B- or higher have a good shot at making the majors.  College players are a bit underrated by this algorithm.

LF: Andreoli (C-), Perez (D-), and Balaguert (D-)
CF: Jae-Hoon (C+), Jackson (C-), Szczur (C-)
RF: Burgess(C), Zapata(D+)

1B: Vogelbach(B+), Bour (D+)
2B: Cardenas(B-), Amaya(C+), Torreyes(C), Watkins(C-)
3B: Candelario(B+), Geiger(B), Vitters(B-)
SS: Baez(B), Alcantara(B-), Lake(C+)
C:Apodaca(C-), Castillo(D+)


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2012, 08:54:15 pm
Alcantara: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, 2 BB, K, E

Szczur: DNP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_07_dbcafa_lakafa_1


Rhee: 6 IP, 2 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_07_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 07, 2012, 09:08:42 pm
Geiger with another homer tonight.  That makes 8 in less than 100 at bats since he came up to Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2012, 09:33:50 pm
Baez: 3-4, HR, RBI, SB

Geiger: 1-5, HR, RBI  - 4th straight game with HR, 5 HR's in that span


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_07_peoafx_cedafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 07, 2012, 09:43:49 pm
Cervenka has been fantastic since the Cubs got him.  He really stunk in the Boston system. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 07, 2012, 09:50:09 pm
I think I'm more excited about Baez than any other position prospect that the cubs have ever had. Rizzo may well turn out to be much better, but Baez's upside is stunning, especially when paired with the likelihood of excellent 3b defense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 07, 2012, 10:14:19 pm
21-year-old 4th round pick Hunter Ackerman has 8K/0BB/3H/7IP in his first three starts.  Teensy sample, but continues the pattern of improved control.  In his brief career, he's had more K's than innings, so the lefty curveball that got him drafted may have some bite. 

Anybody know what his injury was this spring that set him back a couple of months? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2012, 10:18:44 pm
Vitters: 1-4, 2B, RBI, E

Jackson DNP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_07_omaaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 07, 2012, 10:28:00 pm
DSL

*

Je Baez: 3-3, 4 SB

Sanchez: 2-5, 3B, 2 RBI, SB, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_07_dcurok_dtwrok_1


Acosta: 0-3, BB, 2 K, E   -  under .200

Torrez: 7-3-0-0-0-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_07_dphrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on July 07, 2012, 11:46:32 pm
Jorge Soler pictures in Arizona:

http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/search/search?I_DSC=Jorge+Soler&I_DSC_AND=t&I_CITY=&I_STATE=&I_COUNTRY_ISO=&I_IS_RELEASED=&I_IS_PRELEASED=&I_ORIENTATION=&_CB_I_PR=t&_CB_I_PU=t&_CB_I_RF=t&_CB_I_RM=t&I_SORT=RANK&C_ID=C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ&_ACT=search&F_REFINE=t
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2012, 12:00:18 am
Cool pics. Thanks, PR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2012, 12:03:03 am
Candelario: 3-5, 2B, RBI, K

Amaya: 2-5, 2B, SB, K

Scott: 6-3-0-0-1-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_07_boiasx_yakasx_1



Vogelbach: 1-5, 2 RBI

Gretzky: 1-2, 3B (1st EBH), 2 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_07_giarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 08, 2012, 12:12:48 am
That Candelario cat can really put a stick on it.

He's definitely caught my eye.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 08, 2012, 12:46:51 am
How in the world does Lindor rate ahead of Baez on BA's midseason list? I get that Baez is likely to move to 3b, but it's not like Lindor is putting up Profar style numbers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2012, 01:01:21 am
Jorge Soler pictures in Arizona:

http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/search/search?I_DSC=Jorge+Soler&I_DSC_AND=t&I_CITY=&I_STATE=&I_COUNTRY_ISO=&I_IS_RELEASED=&I_IS_PRELEASED=&I_ORIENTATION=&_CB_I_PR=t&_CB_I_PU=t&_CB_I_RF=t&_CB_I_RM=t&I_SORT=RANK&C_ID=C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ&_ACT=search&F_REFINE=t


Am I going to be the first one to say that he looks a lot older than 20?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2012, 01:02:56 am
Quote
Am I going to be the first one to say that he looks a lot older than 20?

The first one to say it, but I was thinking the same thing at least in the first photo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2012, 01:04:39 am
Quote
How in the world does Lindor rate ahead of Baez on BA's midseason list?

BA ranked Lindor a good margin ahead of Baez pre-draft. Thus, they probably still have the impression Lindor's a better prospect. Baez could change that if he explodes offensively as he seems capable of doing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 08, 2012, 06:17:27 am
So Soler goes from the end of his 9 year contract to Social Security benefits.   Big deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 08, 2012, 07:25:22 am
What is the word on catcher Chad Krist at Boise?

Only 54 AB, but he's hitting .352, with only 5 K's and 4 walks, also apparently attended UC Berkley.  http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=C&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=607342  22 all season long, but catchers who can hit are nice to have around.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 08, 2012, 09:01:43 am
arismendy Alcantara, one of the hackers supreme, has taken 5 walks in the last 7 games. 
Torreyes, who walked only 14 times all last season, has walked in 7 of the last ten games. 

As Ron has often mentioned, walking is neither equivalent to nor proof of selectivity, nor of good plate discipline.  But the evidence appears to be growing that at least some guys can change, to some degree.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2012, 09:12:22 am
Alcantara's having a really nice offensive season period, particularly when you consider the league. Course, he's also on pace for about 70 errors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 08, 2012, 09:36:25 am
I wonder how he projects, or what kind of value he has.  He's 20 and hitting .300 with SB and 7 HR, so he looks nice.  Still, he's 5'10", and only 28% of his hits are XBH.  So I wonder if he really projects as a power-hitter or not?  I know that Jeter etc. made some errors as teenage SS's, but they got better fast.  Alcantara's error-rate is horrible and doesn't seem to be improving much in this his 4th year as a full-time professional baseball player. 

So what might his future be off of SS?  If he can't catch and throw from SS, seems likely that his problems there will likely plague him at 2B or 3B as well.  So almost seems that he'll need to move to outfield in order to be decent defensively. 

Utility guy comes to mind, but to some degree I think to play multiple positions you need to be more skilled (not necessarily more gifted, but more skilled) defensively.  You don't need to have the greatest range or speed or arm, but you need to have the instincts and fundamentals so that you can catch grounders, catch flies, and throw the ball straight from whatever position you play.  Mark DeRosa could do that, Jose Hernandez was pretty natural wherever he went.  So for guys like Lake and Alcantara who can't catch grounders or throw straight from SS, they spend years and years trying to master one position, I wonder how likely it will be that suddenly they'll be able to become big-league capable at several or all five of 2B/3B/CF/LF/RF? 

SS is the hardest, though.  So maybe ifhe keeps improving some, in a few years he'll be OK at 2B and 3B, so a good-hitting backup who's toolsy at those positions, maybe too many errors to be a full-time starter but maybe limited enough to make it as a utility guy. 

Alcantara is interesting in that he's a switch-hitter, but has very little difference between his average, OPS, or slugging versus lefties or righties. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 08, 2012, 04:32:34 pm
Sutcliffe on Ha:

"He's as good a centerfielder as I've ever seen."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 08, 2012, 04:33:28 pm
And, on cue, Ha homers to the opposite field off Gerrit Cole.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 08, 2012, 05:04:35 pm
Later, the best centerfielder Sutcliffe has ever seen misjudges a ball off Billy Hamilton's bat for a "triple".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 08, 2012, 05:16:17 pm
In his second PA, Ha crushes a single to LF off Dylan Bundy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 08, 2012, 05:41:44 pm
Ha has been removed from the game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 08, 2012, 05:45:09 pm
Lockhart has gotten two hits in each of his last five games.  Hitting over .300, 5 walks to 4 K's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 08, 2012, 05:48:50 pm
A future lefthanded-hitting Ryan Theriot?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 08, 2012, 06:13:11 pm
I think I'm more excited about Baez than any other position prospect that the cubs have ever had. Rizzo may well turn out to be much better, but Baez's upside is stunning, especially when paired with the likelihood of excellent 3b defense.

I think Baez is a fine prospect, but that statement is all you need to know about the tremendous failure of the Cubs amateur player procurement and development over the past 40 or so years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 08, 2012, 06:33:57 pm
Alberto Cabrera now with 10 BB and 58 Ks on the season at Tenn and Iowa.  A strike-thrower reliever like that figures to be with Cubs soon---maybe before September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 08, 2012, 06:39:06 pm
Greg Rohan has been tearing up AA since being promoted.

Is he our next LaHair?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 08, 2012, 06:51:36 pm
Greg Rohan has been tearing up AA since being promoted.

Is he our next LaHair?

Perhaps.

If he continues for his next 500 PA the same way he has for his last 25.... but 25 plate appearances is a very small sample size.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2012, 07:36:03 pm
Szczur: 0-3, 3 BB, 2 SB, CS

Kirk: 6 IP, 2 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_08_dbcafa_lakafa_1


Vitters: 2-4, 2B, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_08_omaaaa_iowaaa_1


Baez: 1-4, SB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_08_peoafx_cedafx_1


McNutt: 5 IP, 2 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_08_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 08, 2012, 07:54:27 pm
Cabrera has sure been a nice story.  A year ago, he was a 6.16 ERA guy with 101K/74BB/137 IP, anything but a strike thrower.  And a HR-factory. 
To jump from a 1.4:1 K/BB guy to a 6:1 K/BB guy with a 2.38 ERA is very nice progress.  I think they may want to be a little careful with him, since he's been kind of inconsistent in past despite having the good arm.  Make sure he's ready.  But he seems to have the arm and the stuff to be a very valuable member of the staff later if not sooner.  One good strong-armed strike-throwing effective reliever would be a huge asset to the rebuilding. 

We always talk about how off-and-on relievers can be, though.  So they may want to let him lock in success and delivery for a while.

Trade talk has all focused on Garza and Dempster.  I wonder if anybody might give us some Danny Lockhart type prospect for Camp?  He's been a good strike-throwing innings-eater this summer.  Some of the Cub playoff teams might have welcomed a guy like that. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 08, 2012, 08:03:09 pm
On Baez, he's a very fine prospect.  But I've got to admit the big K-numbers, and very low walk numbers, are a reason to be cautious. 

Not many big stars were whiffing 25% of their AB's in low-A.  Or having 30K/7BB type ratios.  The tools are very "loud", to use BA's phrasing from earlier this week.  But I wonder what it is that causes him to K that much, and whether it will vanish with experience.  I'm very hopeful, as I was with Corey, Kelton, Pie, Dopirak, Harvey, and Jackson in A-ball past.  But we've had enough guys with K-problems past who never fixed them to make me at least a little cautious.  Whatever it is that makes a guy miss so often in A-ball may be something intrinsic in the toolbox that may not be coached/practiced/experienced away. 

Hopefully in his case it won't be a chronic problem.  And hopefully in his case he'll hit so many HR's that he can be allowed lots of K's. 


But "six times bitten, twice shy" is probably making me a little paranoid cautious. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2012, 10:34:18 pm
Vogelbach: 0-3, SF, RBI, BB, 2 K

Prieto debut: 1-0-0-0-1-0


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_08_brrrok_cubrok_1


Dominican teams off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 08, 2012, 11:38:47 pm

Boise's game ended after just 5 innings for some reason:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_08_boiasx_yakasx_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 09, 2012, 07:25:05 am
Slaughter rule?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 09, 2012, 11:48:49 am
Quote
I wonder if anybody might give us some Danny Lockhart type prospect for Camp?

I hadn't really thought about Camp as trade-bait, but now I wonder whether that notion has something to do with Sveum mentioning Camp (and Russell) as first-half MVPs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 09, 2012, 11:51:46 am
Sveum mentioning Camp (and Russell) as first-half MVPs.

That pretty much sums up the 2012 season so far for the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2012, 12:06:30 pm
Should be able to get a big haul for an MVP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2012, 12:27:56 pm
No real baseball for 3 days.  I'm bored.

Midseason top 20.  I have included unsigned Alomora, but no other 2012 draftees.


1   Baez
2   Soler
3   Almora
4   Jackson
5   Candelario
6   Lake
7   Zych
8   Vitters
9   Burke
10   Cabrera
11   Geiger
12   Vogelbach
13   Kirk
14   Ha
15   Szcur
16   Rhoderick
17   Loosen
18   Maples
19   Whitenack
20   Baez
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 09, 2012, 12:30:58 pm
Szczur is lower than I expected.

Im not sure that he's anything special either though but you sure hear enough about him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 09, 2012, 12:32:38 pm
If Whitenack is our 19th best prospect, our system is strong.

I hope.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2012, 01:51:28 pm
Tough to rate those that are injured or recovering.  Just before last year's injury, I had him number 5.

And where do you put Maples, who has not yet thrown a pitch, and may NEVER do so?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2012, 01:55:40 pm
Baez with a single and home run so far today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2012, 02:12:47 pm
Quote
And where do you put Maples


Who?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 09, 2012, 02:53:40 pm
I don't see how you can rate Jeffrey Baez #1 and Javier Baez #20...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 09, 2012, 02:56:50 pm
Silly.  #1 isn't Jeffrey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 09, 2012, 02:57:50 pm
It's Joan.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2012, 03:34:17 pm
Baez: 2-4, HR, RBI, E

Jensen: 5-4-1-1-1-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_09_peoafx_cedafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 09, 2012, 04:17:08 pm
I don't see how you can rate Jeffrey Baez #1 and Javier Baez #20...

Javier strikes out more than Jeffrey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 09, 2012, 04:21:59 pm
These days, Joan Baez strikes out regularly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2012, 08:07:42 pm
Acosta: 1-5, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_09_dchrok_dphrok_1


Emeterio: 1-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_09_dtwrok_dcurok_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2012, 08:15:48 pm
Alcantara: 4-5

Szczur: 1-4, 2B, RBI, BB, K

Whitenack:  2-1/3- 8-5-5-3-1


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_09_dbcafa_lakafa_1


Iowa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 09, 2012, 08:49:21 pm
Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_09_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 10, 2012, 01:27:09 am
CBSSports.com:

- The Cubs spent $6 million and a 40-man roster spot on 20-year-old Cuban pitcher Gerardo Concepcion, but scouts who have seen him pitch in the Class A Midwest League have come away totally unimpressed. "They're trying to tell people it's just mechanics that he needs to get straightened out," one scout said. "But I'm telling you, he stinks. If he was in a junior college game you were at, you'd leave." Concepcion is 2-6 with a 7.39 ERA in 12 starts for Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 10, 2012, 02:45:00 am
Candelario: 1-5, 2 RBI, 2 K

Dunston: 1-2, 3B, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_09_boiasx_yakasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 10, 2012, 11:44:57 am
CBSSports.com:

- The Cubs spent $6 million and a 40-man roster spot on 20-year-old Cuban pitcher Gerardo Concepcion, but scouts who have seen him pitch in the Class A Midwest League have come away totally unimpressed. "They're trying to tell people it's just mechanics that he needs to get straightened out," one scout said. "But I'm telling you, he stinks. If he was in a junior college game you were at, you'd leave." Concepcion is 2-6 with a 7.39 ERA in 12 starts for Peoria.

I wonder if now might not actually be a rather good time to deroster him.  Or if that would be bad faith.  40-man roster spots have been kind of easy-come-easy-go recently because the farm has been so bad. But I don't think that's going to remain true for real long.  I think Concepcion's 40-man spot could be better served elsewhere sooner-or-later.  Giving it was part of the deal, but right now I suspect we could keep him and his untapped potential, but get his roster-spot back. 

I admit I'm still optimistic that the Cubs saw something real at one point to justify a good investment.  And that however bad he looks now, he may rediscover that at some point.  So I'm still hopeful.  But it seems if we could do our hoping and developing without burning a 40-man spot, that would be good.  And re-add him if/when it becomes appropriate. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 10, 2012, 11:52:13 am
Well Concepcion was paid $3 million of his $6 million contract as a bonus, so I'm assuming the other $3 million is spread out over 5 years. 

Even though $600K per year is a drop in the hat to most major league teams, I can't imagine there are a lot of teams who would be enthusiastic about paying Concepcion that plus give up a 40 man spot.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/?page_id=140
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on July 10, 2012, 01:24:35 pm
I wonder if now might not actually be a rather good time to deroster him.  Or if that would be bad faith.  40-man roster spots have been kind of easy-come-easy-go recently because the farm has been so bad. But I don't think that's going to remain true for real long.  I think Concepcion's 40-man spot could be better served elsewhere sooner-or-later.  Giving it was part of the deal, but right now I suspect we could keep him and his untapped potential, but get his roster-spot back. 

I admit I'm still optimistic that the Cubs saw something real at one point to justify a good investment.  And that however bad he looks now, he may rediscover that at some point.  So I'm still hopeful.  But it seems if we could do our hoping and developing without burning a 40-man spot, that would be good.  And re-add him if/when it becomes appropriate. 
Agree Craig...surely to GOC  the Cubs brass didn't totally miss on evaluating this guy. There has got to be some potential there
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 10, 2012, 02:19:38 pm
Could be lots of potential...after all, he's real young and playing in the U.S. with nothing familiar.

Soler may experience some MAJOR difficulties in that regard, too.

Of course, most prospects won't make it...scouts don't bat 1.000 either.   

The key is to build a terrific inventory of guys with potential...and our leaders certainly seem to be on a mission to get that done!    They're doing it right!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 10, 2012, 02:39:22 pm
ArizonaPhil

Gerardo Concepcion can be dropped from the 40-man roster at any time, although he would have to first go through Outright Assignment Waivers (which are irrevocable) where he could be claimed by another club for $20,000.

Also, his $6M contract would remain in force even if he is outrighted to the minors (presuming it's all guaranteed money).

I would think it's VERY unlikely that the Cubs would drop Concepcion from the 40-man roster prior to the end of the 2013 season, no matter how badly he pitches.

I could see him get moved down to Boise or AZL Cubs, though. He obviously is not ready for Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 10, 2012, 02:42:52 pm
I could see him get moved down to Boise or AZL Cubs, though. He obviously is not ready for Peoria.

I don't see why they haven't done that already.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 10, 2012, 03:39:41 pm
I don't see why they haven't done that already.

Probably for non-baseball reasons. He has at least one fellow Cuban teammate in Peoria, and is getting to know the community and other teammates there. If they moved him, he'd be in another strange and perhaps scary place with no support network at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 10, 2012, 03:50:49 pm
One day we will learn that the REAL Gerardo Concepcion is still back in Cuba.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 10, 2012, 04:09:30 pm
I wonder if now might not actually be a rather good time to deroster him.  Or if that would be bad faith.  40-man roster spots have been kind of easy-come-easy-go recently because the farm has been so bad. But I don't think that's going to remain true for real long.  I think Concepcion's 40-man spot could be better served elsewhere sooner-or-later.  Giving it was part of the deal, but right now I suspect we could keep him and his untapped potential, but get his roster-spot back. 

I admit I'm still optimistic that the Cubs saw something real at one point to justify a good investment.  And that however bad he looks now, he may rediscover that at some point.  So I'm still hopeful.  But it seems if we could do our hoping and developing without burning a 40-man spot, that would be good.  And re-add him if/when it becomes appropriate.

Someone brought this up way back when, and I am becoming more inclined to believe it.  Could it be Concepcion was given his contract as sort of an advance on Solar and to ensure we had the last bid and/or the bidding would possibly end at some mutually agreed upon preconcieved price with us being the winners?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 10, 2012, 04:20:53 pm
Ray, you are a cynical and conniving *******.

I like how you think.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 10, 2012, 04:24:40 pm
Ray, you are a cynical and conniving *******.

I like how you think.

ah, i'm guessing you must have been the original cynic and what all those stars mean...haha
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 10, 2012, 04:27:25 pm
I didn't realize that  d a v e p o l  was a dirty word on this board, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 10, 2012, 06:23:49 pm
our leaders certainly seem to be on a mission to get that done!    They're doing it right!

Hendry also seemed to be on a mission to make the Cubs a winner... and at this point in his first season it certainly appeared he was doing it right.

The best thing the Cubs are doing now is building a foundation and lowering expectations.

The worst thing that happened for Hendry was to raise expectations without building a foundation, and without ever really trying to build foundation, or making any effort to reduce expectations to allow the time to build a foundation.

Talent evaluation and execution are always key, and the getter a GM and his people are at either, the more it helps, but the most important thing is to change the basic approach from trying to win every year, regardless what is in the system, to trying to build a foundation of young talent which will give a serious shot of winning every year by building up the system.  Theo obviously sold Rickets on the new approach. Makes me wonder whether Hendry ever tried to do that, or if after likely selling Rickets on the strength of the team before the sale was final that even if Hendry later tired to persuade him of the need to completely retool and accept a couple of ugly seasons Rickets would not have accepted Hendry so quickly telling him the team needed to change directions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 10, 2012, 06:27:01 pm
My guess is that it took some time for Ricketts to read your thousands of posts on this matter before he was finally convinced.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 10, 2012, 06:32:25 pm
Of course, Hendry had had six or seven years to build a foundation before he became GM. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 10, 2012, 08:07:11 pm
I don't think that Theo sold Ricketts on the idea of building a solid foundation.  The actions they took last year, spending large amounts of money (compared to pre-Ricketts years) on prospect procurement through the draft and international signings indicate that Ricketts was sold on that idea long before Theo came on board.  It is more likely that Ricketts hired Theo because Theo had the same views that Ricketts already had.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 10, 2012, 09:26:57 pm
I don't think that Theo sold Ricketts on the idea of building a solid foundation.  The actions they took last year, spending large amounts of money (compared to pre-Ricketts years) on prospect procurement through the draft and international signings indicate that Ricketts was sold on that idea long before Theo came on board.  It is more likely that Ricketts hired Theo because Theo had the same views that Ricketts already had.

Perhaps, but not necessarily.

The 2011 draft, and the more aggressive spending on it, made sense even if a team was trying to win quickly, since it would also help to have that talent pool for later years.  The moves since Theo came on have pretty clearly NOT been moves intended to win now.

It would be interesting to know whether Hendry's failure to make any trade deadline moves last year was a Rickets' decision -- that he had simply lost all faith in Hendry and did not want him doing any more harm -- or Hendry's decision to leave things alone without in any way limiting the options of the next GM, or simply a result of indecision on Hendry's part.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 10, 2012, 09:51:48 pm
Bob Brenly hasn't seen his kid do very much so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 10, 2012, 10:05:29 pm
Ricketts had made a bunch of things and said some others and was reported to have said others before the disastrous 2011 season. 

Que es?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 10, 2012, 11:07:28 pm
Heh, brittle diabetes running really low.  Sorry about that. 

My take is that Ricketts was very committed to farm and procurement, and that there was varying evidences of this well before Theo, and before the 2011 season when Hendry still thought the Cubs could contend. 

1.  Ricketts original talk was pro-development.  deeg took it as "cheap" talk, and Dave rightfully noted that every new owner and every new GM talks about how they're going to prioritize a good farm system.  But the talk was there.
2.  I believe it was very early on when a commitment to investing in the Dominican Academy was made.  The antithesis of a "win now" investment.  Well before Theo. 
3.  During his first year Ricketts visited all the farm teams and took an interest in how things ran.  Again, way before Theo.
4.  Ricketts spent a bunch of time with the scouts and Wilken, again something that was unfamiliar.
5.  After the 2010 season, there seemed to be some spending splurge on amateurs.  Big money to sign Szczur.  Threw away a bunch of millions on crummy Cubans (Silva and a no-hit catcher were $2 million, I think...), while at that time I believe still supporting several million on crummy Koreans? 
6.  Some of these increases in spending on procurement/farm were at the same time as a reduced payroll.  Again, deeg was calling for caution, that this might be just an excuse for shrinking payroll and playing it like a mid- or small-market. 
7.  At the convention in 2011 (is that in January?), both Hendry and Wilken mentioned, several times, how Ricketts really was opening up spending on the draft and international procurement.  Both mentioned his commitment to procurement/development, his investment in the Dominican, in signing international players, and Wilken said how he was going to be given much more money for signing draft picks in the 2011 draft.  This was way before Theo, and way before the total W-L disaster that was 2011. 

My conclusion is that Ricketts was very much planning on going heavy on procurement/development.  Theo was a manifestation of that and was selected as a partner in that plan, I think.  The new CBA changed a lot, of course. 

But it wasn't Theo who put the idea into Ricketts's head. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 11, 2012, 08:57:49 am
Good post, Craig...I believe you are spot on about Ricketts.  Of course, that he went after TOP leadership - and, seemingly, are letting them build and execute the master plan - was the REALLY smart move he made!

But if Ricketts hadn't been sharp enough to recognize what needed to occur at a macro level, the great stuff going on now might not be happening at all.  With another owner, we could easily be muddling along as in the past...short-term hopes and no long-term solution!

I think Tom Ricketts (and, perhaps, others in that family) will deserve one heckuva lot of credit down the road a bit, when the long-term plan starts to come to fruition...and I certainly believe that it will!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2012, 09:40:06 am
Craig, while Rickets may have mouthed "pro-development" from the start, he did not allow meaningful spending in the 2010 draft, and none of your 7 points are at odds with the Hendry approach of trying to win every year.  The Theo approach is at odds with trying to win every year.  Theo very clearly wrote off 2012, and has shown no great concern about 2013.  That is a fundamental change.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 11, 2012, 11:09:54 am
Any intelligent owner would spend time gaining understanding of the assets and infrastructure...as Ricketts seemingly was doing in year one and a good part of year two.  Doesn't happen overnight.   He was slower than some of us were hoping for re front-office changes, but that worked out incredibly well!

That Ricketts backed up what he said from the beginning - about building the foundation the right way - by hiring Theo (and letting him actually de-construct to build that foundation) suggests that Ricketts' approach WAS fundamentally different from ANYTHING we had seen in the past.

If Hendry ever thought to do it that way, he was either unable to sell ownership or ill-equipt to execute such a vision...he sure had plenty to time and money to get it done!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 11:44:09 am
Craig, while Rickets may have mouthed "pro-development" from the start, he did not allow meaningful spending in the 2010 draft, and none of your 7 points are at odds with the Hendry approach of trying to win every year.  The Theo approach is at odds with trying to win every year.  Theo very clearly wrote off 2012, and has shown no great concern about 2013.  That is a fundamental change.

As Ben said, only an idiot executive comes into an organization and starts making massive changes based upon assumptions.  Like most of the good ones, Ricketts observed for the first year, and based his decisions on actual facts, rather than third hand reports.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2012, 11:56:15 am
As Ben said, only an idiot executive comes into an organization and starts making massive changes based upon assumptions.  Like most of the good ones, Ricketts observed for the first year, and based his decisions on actual facts, rather than third hand reports.

dave, as you have often pointed out, Rickets is not an executive.  He is an owner.  He HIRES executives and then provides them the resources to, well, execute.  Rickets obviously trusted Hendry and company enough to let them spend quite heavily on the the 2011 draft.  The actual change in direction came with Theo's hiring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2012, 11:58:51 am
BA midseason prospect reports for the Cubs:

Best Player: Rizzo

Leap Forward: Alcantara:

Disappointment: Torreyes


http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/07/midseason-prospect-reports-al-and-nl-central/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2012, 12:08:12 pm
That Ricketts backed up what he said from the beginning - about building the foundation the right way - by hiring Theo (and letting him actually de-construct to build that foundation) suggests that Ricketts' approach WAS fundamentally different from ANYTHING we had seen in the past.

I agree it is a fundamental change  It is the change I have been saying was needed since mid-2006.  The question is whether it is a change which Rickets decided on when he hired Theo, or a change which came with Theo.


If Hendry ever thought to do it that way, he was either unable to sell ownership or ill-equipt to execute such a vision...he sure had plenty to time and money to get it done!

As I have pointed out, Hendry's success in 2003 likely led him to believe that just a bit of tinkering was all that was ever needed, and to believe that no fundamental rebuild was required.  He was wrong.  If he later came to see that error, neither the Tribune nor Zell were going to allow it once they were selling the team, and comments from the Rickets' family at and shortly after the time they bought indicate that they might have had trouble accepting such suggestions at the time.  Whether Hendry ever made them or not would be interesting to know, but likely something we will never find out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2012, 01:11:20 pm
This is off another Cub fan site so take it for what it's worth:


Quote
I talked to one of the AZL Cubs at the game the other day (Saturday night) about Maples. The player told me that Maples has been having some really nice bullpen sessions over the last few weeks and he expects that Maples will see some action within the next week or so. Let's hope so. I'd really like to see what we have.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 11, 2012, 01:16:54 pm
Is there a towel involved?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 11, 2012, 01:36:39 pm
Encouraging rumor on Maples.  When teams become champions, sometimes unexpectedly good or lucky things happen to them.  This never seems to happen to the Cubs, but maybe we're due!  If Maples would show up pitching healthy and effectively, and make his way back onto the prospect landscape by the end of the summer, that would be a very pleasant surprise.  Why not? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 11, 2012, 01:44:11 pm
Craig, check your blood sugar.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 11, 2012, 01:49:25 pm
Any intelligent owner would spend time gaining understanding of the assets and infrastructure...as Ricketts seemingly was doing in year one and a good part of year two.  Doesn't happen overnight.   He was slower than some of us were hoping for re front-office changes, but that worked out incredibly well!...

Yes, that's my take too.  That he used that first year to largely take stock. 

After which he was driving the procurement process. 

IIRC, he did talk early about total spending, in which the total spending was going to be divided between big club and the system.  jes has accurately noted that the spending in his first draft was not crazy high, although IIRC neither was it low.  (They paid Golden a substantial superslot, they paid Ben Wells a very substantial superslot, and after the season they paid Szczur a major superslot as well.  And they were overslotting teenage prospects right and left:  greathouse, Kurcz, Reed, Richardson, Hartman, Fitzgerald, Geiger, Harman, Dallas Beeler were all overslots.  So for a draft in which they had neither a high pick which boosts spending, nor any sandwich picks, I think they spent pretty strongly that draft, although obviously not to the extend that they did last year.) 

But I wonder if that first year, when there was so much of the total-spending tied up in pre-committed big-league contracts, there just wasn't that much discretionary money left. 

But even after that first year, Hendry was still trading Lee/ARcher/Chirinos/Guyer for Garza.  So jes's suggestion that Ricketts was still enabling Nowacrat GMing is not without some merit. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 11, 2012, 02:04:57 pm
Encouraging rumor on Maples.  When teams become champions, sometimes unexpectedly good or lucky things happen to them.  This never seems to happen to the Cubs, but maybe we're due!  If Maples would show up pitching healthy and effectively, and make his way back onto the prospect landscape by the end of the summer, that would be a very pleasant surprise.  Why not? 

Something I went back and looked up when BA named Carlos Rondon of NC State their Freshman of the Year and said would have gone #1 overall in the draft this year if he had been eligible.

•   Dillon Maples was ranked the #2 prospect in the state of North Carolina and the #46 overall prospect for the 2011 draft.
•   Carlos Rondon was ranked the #9 prospect in the state of North Carolina and the #198 overall prospect for the 2011 draft.

Going into the 2011 draft, Maples was clearly considered the better prospect between the two.  I guess that goes to show how much can change for a high school prospect over the course of a year and possibly how scouts can misevaluate players that young. 

Also, it'd certainly be a nice thing if Maples went back to being a clearly better prospect than Rondon wouldn't it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 11, 2012, 02:43:38 pm
Forgive me if I'm misremembering, but isn't Dillon Maples the pitcher whose mechanics were in need of re-tooling?

I know he has been injured (back, shoulder) but maybe it's taking this long for him to make his debut because they've overhauled his motion.  If that's the case, the injuries probably pushed that process back further.

I have high hopes for Maples and might be glass half-fulling it, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 11, 2012, 03:01:19 pm
AAA all-star game on MLB Network tonight at 6 pm CT.  Josh Vitters will represent the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2012, 03:07:18 pm
So jes's suggestion that Ricketts was still enabling Nowacrat GMing is not without some merit.

I was not so much suggesting that Ricketts was enabling a Nowacrat approach as I am wondering the degree to which Ricketts insisted on it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 04:37:14 pm
dave, as you have often pointed out, Rickets is not an executive.  He is an owner.  He HIRES executives and then provides them the resources to, well, execute.  Rickets obviously trusted Hendry and company enough to let them spend quite heavily on the the 2011 draft.  The actual change in direction came with Theo's hiring.

I don'r remember making the point that Ricketts is an owner rather than an executive, but in this context, the point would be meaningless.  It is just as important that a new owner not make major immediate changes than it is for a new executive to refrain from doing so.

It is obvious to me that the new philosophy of building from within came from Ricketts, and implementation was begun prior to the selection of Theo, and it seems likely that the selection of Theo was predicated upon the fact that he agreed with that philosophy, rather than that he brought that philosophy to the team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2012, 05:25:43 pm
What actions, prior to Theo's arrival support the idea that Ricketts have begun implementing the current strategy, which includes essentially writing off seasons instead of making an effort to win every year?

Certainly trade deadline action last year didn't support that idea, and instead is rather contrary to it.  The increased farm system spending and draft spending also is not at all contrary to a win now approach, and until at least the middle of last season, Ricketts was mouthing the same foolishness we heard from Hendry, about the team which was then on the field being one which could get right into the thick of things.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 06:44:13 pm
What actions, prior to Theo's arrival support the idea that Ricketts have begun implementing the current strategy, which includes essentially writing off seasons instead of making an effort to win every year?

Certainly trade deadline action last year didn't support that idea, and instead is rather contrary to it.  The increased farm system spending and draft spending also is not at all contrary to a win now approach, and until at least the middle of last season, Ricketts was mouthing the same foolishness we heard from Hendry, about the team which was then on the field being one which could get right into the thick of things.

Theo himself did not write off the season until it was about half over.  And writing off a season is NOT part of a build from within strategy.  It is merely a tactic that is occasionally used to promote that strategy.  And you are right.  Increased farm spending is NOT contrary to a win now strategy.  As I have been saying for months, and as you have unsuccessfully been trying to refute.

It is quite possible to work on more than one goal at a time, and those goals change with changing situations.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 06:54:29 pm
ArizonaPhil on the competitive draft next week.

Some of the teams that will be receiving Competitive Balance draft picks next Monday are contenders (one is even in 1st place in its division) and are expected to be "buyers" as the trade deadline nears, so don't be surprised if the Cardinals, Pirates, Rays, Reds, Orioles, Diamondbacks, and/or Indians trade their Competitive Balance draft pick before the July 31 trade deadline.


It could be that some of the teams looking to move assets (like the Cubs, for instance) are waiting for the Competitive Balance picks to be awarded before makng trades, since a Competitive Balance draft pick (especially one between the 1st and 2nd rounds) could actually have more value to a seller than the prospects being made available by the buyer.

Suppose Cleveland (one of the teams interest in Cubs pitching) receives a pick.  They could trade it to the Cubs as part of any deal that they make.  I suspect that a pick like that could add quite a bit of value to what the Cubs would get in return.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 11, 2012, 07:01:07 pm
Why in the hell are the Cardinals getting a competitive balance pick?  They're not that broke and they've won two World Series lately. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 07:39:46 pm
It is based upon the size of the market they are in.  ArizonaPhil has a substantial explanation about it on the website.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 11, 2012, 07:49:18 pm
Why in the hell are the Cardinals getting a competitive balance pick?  They're not that broke and they've won two World Series lately. 

They may or may not get one. They'll be in a lottery weighted by winning percentage and revenue, so they'll have perhaps a 20% chance of winning one of the first six picks.  Those picks come after the first round and the free agent comp picks, as well as the extra picks for unsigned first-round picks this year, if any. So we're talking picks somewhere in the 35-45 range. The six picks after the second round will be around the 70-80 range.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2012, 07:58:01 pm
Theo himself did not write off the season until it was about half over.

Perhaps he didn't send you a personal telegram, but Theo had written off this season before spring training began.

And writing off a season is NOT part of a build from within strategy.  It is merely a tactic that is occasionally used to promote that strategy.

Except the Cubs are not using a "build from within" strategy, nor have they talked about doing so.

Rizzo is a fundamental building block, and was acquired by trade.  Many of Theo's comments have made clear that much of what he hopes to do with both those on the roster when he took over (such as LaHair) and some of those he signed as FA or traded for (such as Stewart and DeJesus) is to create value, to then allow trades.  Not sure how you would be defining a "build from within" strategy if you think it is the approach the Cubs are using.  Are they investing heavily in developing the farm?  Sure, but that is simply part of building, and not an indication that the focus will be entirely building from within.


Increased farm spending is NOT contrary to a win now strategy.  As I have been saying for months, and as you have unsuccessfully been trying to refute.

It would be interesting to find a single post where I have tried to suggest that farm spending is contrary to a win now strategy.  I'd love to see one.

It is quite possible to work on more than one goal at a time, and those goals change with changing situations.

True enough with some goals at some times.

If you jump from a plane at 6,000 feet with your parachute on and are trying to call your wife on the cell phone to share the experience with her, I would hope that when your main parachute fails and you find you have to hand-bail your backup chute that you are bright enough to understand that is a time when you need to focus entirely on one goal and forget about the damb phone call.

That is about what the Theocracy faced with the Cubs, and I am very happy they have not been so incredibly stupid as to think that with the state of the franchise they could worry at all about winning anything in 2012.  Your insistence that good executives can multitask ignores the magnitude of the task which was at hand.  In a year and a half or so, yes, they will need to start multi-tasking, focusing on the long term while also trying to win in the year at hand.

Not now.

And writing off a season is NOT part of a build from within strategy.  It is merely a tactic that is occasionally used to promote that strategy.  And you are right.  Increased farm spending is NOT contrary to a win now strategy.  As I have been saying for months, and as you have unsuccessfully been trying to refute.

It is quite possible to work on more than one goal at a time, and those goals change with changing situations.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 08:37:09 pm
Perhaps he didn't send you a personal telegram, but Theo had written off this season before spring training began.


It seems that I don't have your ability to read minds.  But you seem to be contradicting yourself.  According to your past posts, a season is not written off unless all veterans are traded for prospects.  Did I miss the trade of Dempster?  Garza?  Soto?  Barney?  Marmol?  Baker?  Maholm?  According to your faulty dilemma, giving up on a season can not happen without EVERYONE that will not add to the team 4 years down the line must be traded.

Hasn't happened.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 08:38:47 pm
Baez with another home run.  Peralta with an outstanding game pitched so far.  7 innings.  2 hits.  0 runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 11, 2012, 08:51:19 pm
According to your past posts, a season is not written off unless all veterans are traded for prospects.

It would be interesting to see you produce a post where I wrote that, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 11, 2012, 08:57:12 pm
In his AAA All-Star AB, Josh Vitters........walked.

I think he, too, is getting the message!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 11, 2012, 09:08:26 pm
Vitters just took his 2nd AB in the 9th...and he whiffed on a change up.

He's a pretty big dude...got fooled on the change up, but took a walk and didn't look overly anxious in his 2nd AB. 

Bat looked pretty quick as it must be to do as well as he's done so far this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2012, 09:16:28 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2 2B, RBI, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_11_pbcafa_dbcafa_1


Baez: 1-3, HR, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_11_dayafx_peoafx_1



Tennessee rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2012, 09:23:48 pm
Alcala: 3-6, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, K

Paulino: 4-2/3 -4-2-1-3-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_11_dcurok_dparok_1


Malave: 3-5, 2B, RBI, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_11_dacrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2012, 09:27:31 pm
Shawon Dunston JR. was demoted to Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 09:35:40 pm
Overdue move.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 11, 2012, 09:52:45 pm
What draft are we talking about? I'm totally lost.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 10:37:18 pm
Beginning next year there will be 6 draft choices between round 1 and 2, and another 6 draft choices between rounds 2 and 3.  They will be awarded in a lottery that will take place next week.  Those eligible for the lottery will be the twelve (I believe) smallest market teams.  These draft choices can be traded this year until the end of the season, or next year from the beginning of the season through shortly before next year's draft.

This link goes into great detail.

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/07/11/you-cant-win-if-you-dont-play
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 11, 2012, 10:52:42 pm
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_11_dcurok_dparok_1
..

Speedy Jeff Baez has 20 SB in 24 games with a .406 OBP.  Interestingly, for a speedy leadoff prospect, he'd walked only 6 times in the first 22 games and 80-some AB.  And he K'd a lot.  But after 6 walks in 22 games, he's now walked 6 times in the last two games.  Funny.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 11, 2012, 11:01:12 pm
Vogelbach with his fourth home run in a league that usually sees few home runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 11, 2012, 11:10:43 pm
Candelario: 0-4, 3 K

Arias: 5-6-1-1-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_11_vanasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 11, 2012, 11:28:48 pm
Vogelbach with his fourth home run in a league that usually sees few home runs.

Daniel Lockhart with his 6th consecutive multi-hit game (2 each).  Multi-hit-game streak would be an interesting record to contrast to regular hitting streak.  His OBP must be up near .400 now.  His BABIP must be pretty good, hard to hit .333 with no HR without a good BABIP.  But with only 4 K's in 57 AB, you don't need a fluky BABIP to sustain a good batting average.  5 XBH in 55 AB entering today. 

Nice to see Vogelbach putting up some numbers.  He's got 10 K's in 65 AB, pretty good for a power guy. 

Corbin Hoffner made his pro debut today, 2 K's in one perfect inning.  I think he may have gotten less scouting commentary than anybody we selected or signed, although UK's report said he was 87-90 and unlikely to get faster.  Not sure what the thinking was there.  He's the 18-year-old 235/6'5" giant.  You'd think an 18-year-old guy with size like that might have a chance to perhaps throw harder someday, although obviously if he's already 235, "filling out" is not something you're looking for him to do!  K'd a little more than 1 batter-per-inning in Florida JC this spring, and those leagues can be pretty competitive. 


The other giant who debuted was "Carl" Lang, with a perfect 1K inning.  He's the 6th round guy listed as "Trey" Lang in the draft.  He lists at only 225 and 6'3".  AZL may not often see guys back-to-back as big/heavy as Lang and Hoffner. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 11, 2012, 11:55:32 pm
With Vogelbach, Hoffner and Lang on the team, I doubt the ARL Cubs will be involved in many bench-clearing brawls.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 12:01:07 am
Vogelbach: 2-4, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, SB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_11_pdrrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 01:54:59 am
Quote
Baez’s solo homer in the second inning provided the game’s only run, and a hustling defensive play kept the shutout intact in the fourth.

.....

Peralta faced the minimum in the first three innings — Yorman Rodriguez reached on a single in the second but was caught stealing. He came up again with two outs and Spencer Dickinson at second base in the fourth inning.

Rodriguez hit a grounder to third that went under Dustin Geiger’s glove and Dickinson rounded third trying to score. Baez backed up the play and picked up the ball in short left field.

“I thought Dustin was going to get it,” Baez said. “I just hustled.”

Chiefs catcher Sergio Burruel saw the play develop and knew there was a good chance to get Dickinson at the plate.

“I was yelling at him, ‘You got it, you got it,’” Burruel said. “I was telling him he had plenty of time.”

Baez delivered a perfect strike, and Dickinson was out by 10 feet.

“That’s great awareness and great hustle to back up in that situation knowing that guy might try to score,” Chiefs manager Casey Kopitzke said.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 01:58:54 am
Vitters went 0-3 with a walk and a strikeout in the AAA all-star game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 12, 2012, 02:23:34 am
Vitters went 0-3 with a walk and a strikeout in the AAA all-star game.

Chris, according to the box score on MiLB, Vitters was 0-1 with a walk and a strikeout. (I thought it was unlikely a reserve would get four plate appearances.)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 12, 2012, 12:21:12 pm
ArizonaPhil

20-year old RHP Trey Lang (6th round pick out of Gateway CC in Phoenix) threw a 14-pitch 1-2-3 3rd inning, and he is quite a presence on the mound (6'3 225+).


Lang was a star outfielder at Skyline HS in Mesa and set various HR and slugging records there, before enrolling as a two-way player (OF/RHP) at Northern Illinois University as a Freshman in 2010. He only lasted one year at NIU (as his weight ballooned to 250+) before transferring back home to GCC, where he was the Geckos' RF and closer this past season.


The Cubs drafted him as a pitcher (he would have transferred to the U. of New Mexico if he hadn't signed with the Cubs), and you can see the potential he has as a late-inning reliever. He throws unmitigated gas. He just needs to keep the weight off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 12, 2012, 12:26:39 pm
Lee Smith if everything works out spectacularly well?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 12, 2012, 12:36:45 pm
Keith Law's midseason top 50 is out:

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/8150343/jurickson-profar-texas-rangers-new-no-1-prospect-baseball-mlb

Baez is ranked #35 (up from #95 in his preseason list).  Almora is #48, and Soler is #50.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 12:48:16 pm
Almora and Soler are roommates in Mesa according to Almora via Twitter.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 12, 2012, 12:54:32 pm
Lee Smith if everything works out spectacularly well?

Feeling a bit optimistic today?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 12, 2012, 01:53:16 pm
I don't suppose we could get the write ups on our guys...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 12, 2012, 02:00:11 pm
Write-ups are short (and I misread on Almora...he's actually #47, not 48:

Quote
35. Javier Baez, SS, Chicago Cubs (age 19)
Current level: Low Class A (Peoria)
Preseason ranking: 95

The lack of patience (30 strikeouts and seven walks in 129 at-bats) is a concern -- he was a bit of a hacker in high school but could hit almost everything close to the plate then -- but the bat speed and power are still strong. He has even shown some unexpected ability to steal bases in a small sample. Like several shortstop prospects on this list, he is more likely to end up as a third baseman in the majors.

47. Albert Almora, OF, Chicago Cubs (age 18)
Current level: TBD
Preseason ranking: N/A

Projects as a plus defender in center who hits for high averages. He agreed to terms Wednesday and probably won't appear in a game until next week.

50. Jorge Soler, OF, Chicago Cubs (age 20)
Current level: TBD
Preseason ranking: N/A

The toolsy outfielder should make his pro debut next week, at which point we'll start to see how polished he is, or isn't, as a hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 12, 2012, 02:42:42 pm
By the way, Hak-Ju Lee still rates ahead of any of the Cubs guys, but dropped a lot:

Quote
33. Hak-Ju Lee, SS, Tampa Bay Rays (age 21)
Current level: Double-A (Montgomery)
Preseason ranking: 12

He had a brutal start to the year, after which the Rays worked with Lee to get him to keep his hands from leaking forward and he started to hit again. If he doesn't hit -- and that's a bigger question mark today than it was six months ago -- he is a utility infielder. If he does hit, he has enough speed, patience and defense to profile as an above-average regular at short.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 12, 2012, 04:39:43 pm
Law loves Lee. Always has ranked him higher than others.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 12, 2012, 04:50:35 pm
And some claim he'll be better than Castro.

LMAO
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 12, 2012, 05:44:08 pm
Lee is #47 in the BA mid-season top 50---not a lot different than Law's ranking.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 12, 2012, 05:48:56 pm
33 to 47. That's a "42% drop." Numerically quantifying that is silly, I know, but I do think there's a difference between low 30's and high 40's/almost not making the list. Either way, it's consistent with the trend of Law rating him higher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 12, 2012, 05:53:30 pm
Will Theo and Jed get more value for Garza than Punch Drunk gave up?  Not likely, but we'll see.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 12, 2012, 06:06:15 pm
Is it a foregone conclusion that they'll deal him rather than extend?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 12, 2012, 06:41:55 pm
It should be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 07:12:34 pm
DSL

.

Alcala: 3-4, RBI, SB, CS

Emeterio: 0-1, 3 BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_12_dorrok_dcurok_1


Santana: 5-2-0-0-2-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_12_dchrok_dmerok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 12, 2012, 07:35:52 pm
Will Theo and Jed get more value for Garza than Punch Drunk gave up?  Not likely, but we'll see.

So far, it doesn't look like he gave up all that much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 12, 2012, 07:37:11 pm
When traded, Archer ranked 27 on BA's prospect list. Lee was 92. That was also the peak of their respective values, thu far.

My guess is that we'll exceed that haul, with the headliner perhaps not rating quite as high, but with the second name being better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 12, 2012, 09:55:18 pm
Another home run for Vogelbach, who seems to be showing some of the power that caused him to be drafted.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 12, 2012, 09:56:46 pm
How is 92 the peak of Lee's value when he's currently ranked #47?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 10:07:37 pm
Szczur: 0-2, SF, RBI, SB, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_12_pbcafa_dbcafa_1


Tenn Gm 1:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_12_tenaax_biraax_1


Struck: 6-3-0-0-0-7


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_12_tenaax_biraax_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 10:09:36 pm
Baez: 1-4, 2B, K

Rosario: 6 IP, 1 R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_12_dayafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 12, 2012, 10:12:46 pm
How is 92 the peak of Lee's value when he's currently ranked #47?

Time for a refresher course in jesmath....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 12, 2012, 10:22:53 pm
Yeah, that's kind of a duh mistake on my part, eh?

Either way, I stand by my statement that we will get more for Garza than we gave up at the time, if you buy where BA ranked them at the time. Deeg, I know you probably don't, as you've always been a big Lee fan. Law is obviously with you on that point, and that's admittedly good company.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 10:34:35 pm
I'm not sure Garza's as highly thought of as he was right before the Cubs acquired him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 11:09:19 pm
Jackson: 1-2, RBI, SB, 3 BB, K

Vitters: 2-4, 2B, RBI, BB, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_12_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 12, 2012, 11:22:04 pm
Vitters stats are quite good at this point and Jackson's are, too, except for the 122 Ks and .263 BA (which is better, but still low for a top prospect).  Vitters is now at .304 BA!

The good news: in 318 ABs for each starting tonight, they each have 40 XBHs!  Vitters with 13 HR, 26 doubles, 1 triple, whereas Jackson has 18 doubles, 10 triples and 12 bombs, along with 20 SBs in 24 attempts.

After tonight, Vitters OBP must be near .360 and Jackson's nearing .350.  Both slugging around .500 and OPS over .835 each.

Let's hope they can keep it up and build on their positive momentum.

The farm gets more interesting by the week!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 12, 2012, 11:26:03 pm
Vitters' batting average per month has gone .261 in April, .284 in May, .324 in June, and so far .389 in July.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 12, 2012, 11:26:42 pm
Vogelbach: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, E

Dunston: 0-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_12_cubrok_giarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 12, 2012, 11:35:23 pm
Bijan Rademacher with three more hits tonight at Boise.  Does anyone have a scouting report on him.  All I have is that he was a two way player that was thought to have more potential as a pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 12, 2012, 11:37:40 pm
Bijan also finally drew his first walk of the season tonight after 51 AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on July 12, 2012, 11:40:44 pm
I remember reading when the Cubs signed him that he was able to pitch with both arms.  I think they said he could get up to 95 MPH with his left hand and got up to 88 or so as a righty.  I started dreaming that maybe we'll finally have a pitcher able to do that in the majors, but he apparently wants to play the field.  I think I also remember reading that the Cubs supposedly told him to only throw left handed from now on. 

That's about all I remember. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 12, 2012, 11:40:53 pm
How much more does Josh Vitters have to do to get called up?

I thought the point of going to the minors was to hit your way to the show?

All the while Luis Valbuena is our 3rd baseman...LMAO.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 12, 2012, 11:42:01 pm
The one thing I think is interesting about Bijan is that he was a Cal State Fullerton player at one time, and you have to be able to play to be able to get on that team. 

Still, he has a long way to go from Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on July 12, 2012, 11:44:12 pm
Old clip of Rademacher where they show him throwing with both arms.  This was from his high school days. 

http://www.kimatv.com/sports/21615484.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 12, 2012, 11:52:12 pm
Boise's opponent tonight, a Blue Jays farm team, started a 50th round draft pick on the mound, followed him up an undrafted player, snuck their recently signed first round pick in for an inning, then turned to another undrafted player, then a 36th round pick, and finally a 46th round pick.

That's just a weak league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 12, 2012, 11:53:21 pm
I thought the point of going to the minors was to hit your way to the show?

No.  The point of going to the minors is to work on your flaws until you are ready to play in the majors.  A lot of guys hit well in the minors but can't make it in the majors.  Koie Hill was one of them.  Felix Pie was another.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2012, 12:11:02 am
Amaya: 2-4, HR, SF, 2 RBI, SB, BB

Candelario: 2-5, RBI, 2 K

Shoulders: 1-3, HR, 3 RBI, 2 BB,  (Homers in 3 straight)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_12_vanasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 13, 2012, 12:30:55 am
Yeah, that's kind of a duh mistake on my part, eh?

Either way, I stand by my statement that we will get more for Garza than we gave up at the time, if you buy where BA ranked them at the time. Deeg, I know you probably don't, as you've always been a big Lee fan. Law is obviously with you on that point, and that's admittedly good company.

#47 is BA - Law is #32.

Failure to appreciate what guys like Lee can provide a franchise is one of the reasons the Cubs are in the mess they're in now.  I'd like to believe Theo would never have traded Lee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 13, 2012, 12:50:42 am
We talked about this before the Garza trade.  If you thought that Castro could stay at SS long-term, Lee was blocked---as it makes no sense to move Lee to another position.  His value is at SS. 

The only issue is whether acquiring Garza was the right deal and whether the overall package was too much or whether they should have waited longer to trade Lee.  My expectation is that Lee will be a starting SS in the majors for a long time.  But, you can only play one guy at the position.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 13, 2012, 01:02:40 am
Bijan also finally drew his first walk of the season tonight after 51 AB.

JR, the box score say Bijan's walk was intentional.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2012, 03:42:37 am
A piece on the Hayden Simpson mess:

http://www.idahopress.com/sports/hawks-pitcher-simpson-taking-setback-in-stride/article_212e342c-ccb9-11e1-ab86-0019bb2963f4.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 13, 2012, 10:57:02 am
The only issue is whether acquiring Garza was the right deal and whether the overall package was too much or whether they should have waited longer to trade Lee.  My expectation is that Lee will be a starting SS in the majors for a long time.  But, you can only play one guy at the position.

If the Cubs had been confident Lee would continue to develop, and did not think they might actually have been selling him high when they traded him, then even if Castro was expected to remain at SS it might still have made more sense to keep Lee for another year or two.  Trading him as a high performing AA or AAA SS would have brought more value than trading him as a high performing low level SS, and he would also have provided insurance if Castro was hit by a bus, or charged with raping someone he picked up at a bar at 3AM and took back to his apartment.... not that either of those things could ever happen.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 13, 2012, 11:07:54 am
Lee's value could have been expected to increase over time if he developed as hoped.  But that is no reason to refrain from trading him.  They were trading him for a pitcher who would also be expected to increase in value, if he developed as hoped.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 13, 2012, 11:15:45 am
Thanks for the Simpson article.  It keeps the hope brewing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2012, 01:03:54 pm
Quote
No. 2    JAVIER BAEZ, SS, CUBS

Team: low Class A Peoria (Midwest)

Age: 19

Why He's Here: .435/.435/.870 (10-for-23), 1 2B, 3 HR, 5 R, 3 RBIs, 0 BB, 3 SO, 2-2 SB

The Scoop: The Cubs passed over several college arms to draft Baez with the ninth overall pick in 2011, and he has not disappointed in his first full season as a pro. Batting .308/.374/.526 with seven homers through 37 games, the Puerto Rico-born shortstop has hit safely in each of his last eight games and has homered in two of his last three. Despite just average speed, he has also stolen 14 bags this season. With bat speed that has prompted comparisons with Gary Sheffield and Hanley Ramirez, Baez has tremendous upside and could move quickly through the minors, especially if he continues to produce like has at the plate.



Quote
While Anthony Rizzo was bashing his way to Chicago, SS Arismendy Alcantara's excellent season for high Class A Daytona may be an even more promising development. After all, Rizzo's power surge isn't much of a surprise, but Alcantara's emergence as a rangy shortstop who can hit is a very pleasant surprise for the Cubs. The 20-year-old hit .400/.500/.850 this week and is slugging a very respectable .447 this season while swiping 25 bags in 29 tries in the Florida State League.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613725.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2012, 02:43:38 pm
Sure seems like Pierce Johnson should be pitching by now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 13, 2012, 06:09:35 pm
Last night's Boise highlights:

http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/2012/07/13/development-vs-winning/

Rock Shoulders looks like he could be an offensive lineman with the Bears.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on July 13, 2012, 09:49:16 pm
Can anyone tell me about Eric Jokisch's stuff ?  Is he just a soft toss lefty ? Tonight he's only given up one hit going to the 5th inning and he will improve his record to 5-1 at AA-- Smokies are uo 7-0. Is Jokisch someone who can make the Cubs rotation down the road ?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2012, 10:08:08 pm
Baez: 1-3, SB, HBP, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_13_dayafx_peoafx_1


Francescon: 5-2-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_13_pbcafa_dbcafa_1



Vitters: 1-4, RBI

Jackson: 0-4, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_13_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2012, 10:10:50 pm
I think it's time to move Vogelbach up to Boise. He has homered for the third straight game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 13, 2012, 11:37:14 pm
Amaya: 2-5, HR, RBI, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_13_vanasx_boiasx_1



Torrez: 5-2-0-0-1-4

Acosta: 0-2, 2 BB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_13_dmerok_dchrok_1



Alcala: 2-4, 2 RBI, SB, BB, E

Je Baez: 2-6, 2B, 3B, 2 RBI, SB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_13_dcurok_dorrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 03:10:01 am
Vodelbach: 3-4, 2 2B, HR, RBI, BB

Dunston: 0-5, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_13_rngrok_cubrok_1


McNutt: 2-1-0-0-0-2  (in relief)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_13_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 14, 2012, 06:24:13 am
Vodelbach: 3-4, 2 2B, HR, RBI, BB

Wasn't it just 2 or 3 weeks ago some of us were wondering what had happened to Vogelbach?

He now is at .365/.415/.770/1.185 with 7 walks and 11 Ks, 6 HR and 10 2B in his 74 AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 14, 2012, 09:46:41 am
Caro scored 5 times last night!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 14, 2012, 10:10:33 am
The Mesa Cubs are 14-5

DSL 1  20-16

DSL 2  21-15

I'd have guessed the W-L record in DSL would be even higher.  They've seemed to be totally dominant in a ton of games, with lots of guys with good hitting and lots of nice-looking pitching lines.  Hard to know, of course, whether any of those guys have any long-term big-league potential.  Obviously none of the big-ticket names have been very impressive at all.   Dunston, Maples, Gretzky, Malave, that whiffing guy, Marcano, the most expensive publicized special signings haven't been vey exciting, although Candelerio of course has been nice.

But who knows which of the unknown Dominican Leaguers might actually be good. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 14, 2012, 11:19:14 am
Has anyone seen Pelotero?  It looks like it might be worth seeing.

http://movies.nytimes.com/2012/07/13/movies/ballplayer-pelotero-baseball-scouting-in-the-dominican-republic.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 14, 2012, 11:58:51 am
The Mesa Cubs are 14-5

DSL 1  20-16

DSL 2  21-15

I'd have guessed the W-L record in DSL would be even higher. 

I thought so too.  But both teams got off to a rather mediocre start and now are both on rather hot streaks.  It would be interesting if we could get a recap of the year's overseas signings, such as the one we got at this time last year.  Stats are always fun to follow, but for kids at this level, scouting reports are a lot more useful in sorting out which guys are worth watching (Candelario), and which ones are just taking advantage of terrible pitching/hitting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 14, 2012, 12:20:27 pm
Vogelbach is putting up stupid numbers. Time to promote.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 14, 2012, 01:37:51 pm
Especially since Shoulders is doing rather poorly in Boise.  Time to switch them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 01:50:15 pm
Shoulders has picked it up lately though. His OPS over his last 9 games is roughly 1.100.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 01:53:16 pm
Quote
But who knows which of the unknown Dominican Leaguers might actually be good. 

Can't help but be intrigued by the two young left-handers Paulino and Rodriguez and the two infielders Alcala and Emeterio.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 02:00:34 pm
From yesterday's BA Hot Sheet chat:


Quote
Ben (Leland Grove): Could you rank these Cubs prospects for us in terms of potential - Jorge Soler, Javier Baez, Albert Almora? Thanks.



Matthew Eddy: Cubs fans really must be excited by the hot start of Javier Baez in a difficult Midwest League setting, and while I hate to automatically side with the shiny new toy, I think I'd (g-a-m-b-l-e) on Almora as the best bet of the bunch. True up-the-middle profile as a CF with significant offensive upside. The separator might be the plus makeup to grind through a difficult five-month season and endure the inevitable failings.



Quote
Andrew (Chicago): I am really intrigued by Arsimendy Alcantara, he seems to have come out of nowhere. Does he project to stay at SS? and is he making a case for the Cubs top 10?


Matthew Eddy: Yes, Alcantara is a legit SS pop-up prospect. Coming into the season, scouts regarded his best tools as his speed, arm and fielding range/consistency, so adding any sort of offense to his credentials boosts his stock considerably. Now he looks like at worst a switch-hitting utility player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 02:04:08 pm
This place actually censored g-a-m-b-l-e in the above post which is why it's typed  out like that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 02:18:13 pm
Keith Law trying to throw cold water on Vogelbach. He says Vogs isn't ready for a promotion and last night, while at the game, tweeted that Vogelbach's homer came off "not exactly quality pitching."

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 14, 2012, 02:29:01 pm
Keith Law trying to throw cold water on Vogelbach. He says Vogs isn't ready for a promotion and last night, while at the game, tweeted that Vogelbach's homer came off "not exactly quality pitching."

If you go thru the 61 HR Maris hit in 1961, you will find that an awful lot of them also came off "not exactly quality pitching," guys who would have been in the minors except for the fact the AL had expanded that season.  Good hitters are SUPPOSED to eat the lunch of bad pitchers.  That is often a major reason for promotion, to force the hitter to improve by facing better pitching and not to develop bad habits by doing well against bums who don't force the more disciplined approach which will ultimately be needed to succeed in the majors.  What would law rather a power hitter do against "not exactly quality pitching?"  Show that he can bunt?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 14, 2012, 02:37:08 pm
Keith Law trying to throw cold water on Vogelbach. He says Vogs isn't ready for a promotion and last night, while at the game, tweeted that Vogelbach's homer came off "not exactly quality pitching."

Well it's Mesa.  Of course it's not quality pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 14, 2012, 03:00:19 pm
But it is true that pitching quality makes stats less meaningful at Mesa and Boise, and even Peoria.  Scouting reports, that can take into account things like quality of pitching, etc, are much more meaningful that just relying on the stats alone.

But all things being equal, I feel better with Vogelbach hitting 350 and 7 home runs in Mesa than with Vogelbach hitting 250 and no home runs in Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 03:19:00 pm
It's a strange stance for Law to take. I'm curious as to what league observes think of Vogelbach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 14, 2012, 03:40:14 pm
The fact that it's not quality pitching is my point. He could probably stand to face some.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 14, 2012, 03:41:44 pm
I could consider jumping Volgelbach up to Peoria to play with Baez.  Shoulders seems to have some possibilities and has been producing, and he probably has more long-term potential that does Hoilman.  Hoilman is 23 with 7 HR/.256 in mid-July.  So at this point I don't think Hoilman merits much serious consideration as anything more than fun-story-great-guy roster-fill.  If anything, maybe the 1B to block Peoria would be Geiger, who's got more HR's than Holiman in 1/3 the AB and is 3 years younger, so perhaps Geiger matters. 

But given that Vogelbach isn't having any K-problems at Mesa, he'd seem much better qualified to handle Midwest pitching than Shoulders, who is a massive K-king.  Just a possibility. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 14, 2012, 03:50:47 pm
I would rather that they didn't promote Vogelbach to Peoria unless they were very confident that he can handle it.  I would prefer that he play at the highest level where he can excel.  confidence is a major part of a prospect's development.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 14, 2012, 04:23:00 pm
While promoting Shoulders to Peoria might hurt him, he is not nearly the prospect Vogelbach is.  The primary consideration in where to put the two of them needs to be what is best for Vogelbach, not whether Shoulders could end up struggling in Peoria because he K's too much.  If Shoulders reaches his peak value, he as a few decent seasons in the majors as a starter.  Not a star, but decent starter seasons.  If Vogelbach reaches his peak, he is a franchise cornerstone for a decade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 14, 2012, 04:38:19 pm
The Cubs apparently feel that Vogelbach's development will be helped more by having him in Mesa than in Boise or Peoria. That may because the quality of opposing pitchers is lower, the coaching is more intense or the opportunities to get his body into better playing shape are better in Mesa, or some combination of these reasons. But I'm very comfortable assuming the possibiily of hurting the feelings of Hoilman and Shoulders is not the reason he's there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 14, 2012, 04:59:34 pm
Good points by everybody.  I totally agree with the points that Vogelbach's assignment is because that's where the Cubs think he is best served, and Shoulders/Hoilman don't factor into that.  I do think that Mesa could be an awfully good environment for improving.  They've got tremendous facilities, not just the multiple fields but also the weight rooms, and trainers/nutritionists/health people that Boise does not have.  Those may be especially important for a body like Vogelbach's.  And the whole environment is set up for teaching and practice.  Given all the players that are down there, there is a lot going on other than just playing the games.  Plus time spend travelling is much more limited.  I often wonder how much time the Peoria or Boise guys are spending on baseball outside of the games themselves.  It may well be that for most guys, the most productive developmental time they'll ever get during their minor league process is their time spend at Mesa. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 05:06:25 pm
Vogelbach actually looks to be in pretty good shape, certainly a lot better than he was in photos from two years ago.


(https://p.twimg.com/Axu9PJwCIAArWXn.jpg:large)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 14, 2012, 05:21:04 pm
There's no valid reason to rush Vogelbach's development. If the NL adopts the DL this winter or next, the Cubs have it covered with Soriano. Beyond 2014, Vitters and Lake (if they're still around and Lake isn't pitching) should be available if Vogelbach isn't ready.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 14, 2012, 05:39:33 pm
Very cool picture above of ball and mat becoming one.  Very cool.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 14, 2012, 06:42:47 pm
http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/gallery/AZL-Cubs-2012/G0000DyZFTZbJ82g/C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ (http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/gallery/AZL-Cubs-2012/G0000DyZFTZbJ82g/C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ)

Bill Mitchell has tons of Arizona pictures. 
Here's scrawny Rashard Crawford, for example.  http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/AZL-Cubs-2012/G0000DyZFTZbJ82g/I00000uhl9YpMiwU/C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ (http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/AZL-Cubs-2012/G0000DyZFTZbJ82g/I00000uhl9YpMiwU/C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ)

It's kind of funny to scroll through the page, and all of these variably slender young men. 

Soler looks pretty well put together:  http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/AZL-Cubs-2012/G0000DyZFTZbJ82g/I00009SD68P32PPo/C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ (http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/AZL-Cubs-2012/G0000DyZFTZbJ82g/I00009SD68P32PPo/C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ)

But then this picture of Soler, perhaps the biggest most built position player in Mesa standing next to Vogelbach really highlights what a totally different body build Vogelbach has.  http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/AZL-Cubs-2012/G0000DyZFTZbJ82g/I0000opWT6ZIs80U/C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ (http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/AZL-Cubs-2012/G0000DyZFTZbJ82g/I0000opWT6ZIs80U/C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ)

Vogel is several inches shorter, and way more barrell-chested than Soler.  Probably twice the size of Crawford.  Contrast the difference between Vogel's knees and Soler's, or the leg length.  But Vogel doesn't look fat at all to me in that picture.  Actually seems like he might be rather ideally put together for hitting for power, but without having the large strike zone and long levers that can make for long swings and extreme difficulty with plate coverage for so many real tall power hitters.  A good contact hitter who can cover the plate, but who hits with power?  Why not dream. 

Obviously doesn't look the standard body for a desirable fielder or baserunner, though. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 14, 2012, 08:36:59 pm
Javier Baez with a home run, triple, stolen base and 4 RBIs tonigth...so far!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 09:20:32 pm
Rhee: 5-5-2-2-2-6

Zych: 2-1-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_14_jacaax_tenaax_1


Szczur: 1-5, RBI, E (first of the year)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_14_pbcafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 14, 2012, 09:54:02 pm
Vitters: 1-5, 2B, 2 K, E

Jackson: 1-4, BB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_14_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 01:47:37 am
Baez: 3-5, 3B, HR, 4 RBI, SB, PO/CS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_14_bgrafx_peoafx_1


Vogelbach: 2-5, 2B, 4 RBI

Blackburn: 1-2-1-1-0-0, HR

Amlung: 2-0-0-0-0-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_14_cubrok_pdrrok_1



Amaya: 2-4, 3B, BB

Shoulders: 2-3, 2B, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_14_vanasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 02:57:49 am
Since Baez' 2-16 start in May, he's hitting .344 over 125 AB's with a .616 SLG%.

If you include a game that was rained out, he'd be at .349 with a .627 SLG%.

He also hasn't walked in 57 at-bats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 03:33:20 am
Long piece on Arismendy Alcantara:

http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2012/07/12/daytona-cubs-alcantara-has-a-lot-to-smile-about.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 04:46:03 am
Quote
Needing a double to hit for the cycle, Baez nearly ended the game in the ninth. With one out and Paul Hoilman on first base, the native of Puerto Rico hit a drive the opposite way to right-center field that was tracked down by right fielder Drew Vettleson.

"He put a good swing on it and gave it a pretty good ride," Chiefs manager Casey Kopitzke said. "That outfielder made a pretty good catch and certainly had to cover a lot of ground to get there."



http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120714&content_id=34961330&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb&partnerId=rss_chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 05:03:00 am
Saturday Chiefs highlights:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOzm4smaep4&feature=plcp



Thursday:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0p9B8Uhk8w&feature=plcp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 15, 2012, 08:03:19 am
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=624003

Carlos Martinez, the mongo Cuban pitcher who got mediocre scouting reports when signed and didn't cost a whole bunch, has been effective in 4 of 5 outings.  If you subtract the one bad outing in which he walked 3 and allowed 3 hits in .1 inning, he'd be 16K/3BB/8H/16IP.  Very likely just taking advantage of rookie-league hitters.  But you never know, and when a guy is 6'4" 230, it's always possible to imagine some velocity being there or emerging, such that if he somehow was able to develop a slider, you might have something. 

Nice start for Amlung.  He's likely to be a guy who is effective in the low minors.  Higher up, maybe rather limited. 

Very unjazzy debuts for Blackburn and Prieto. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 15, 2012, 10:59:45 am
Long piece on Arismendy Alcantara:

http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2012/07/12/daytona-cubs-alcantara-has-a-lot-to-smile-about.html

Alcantara also has fielding and throwing skills that are far better than his production, which has been hampered by 35 errors.

Ouch.  35 errors so far this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 15, 2012, 11:52:34 am
I think it's safe to say that our farm system should be about to get a strong jolt with the upcoming trades and IMO it's already starting to look better.

I really like doing things this way.

I guess all along I really was a buildican.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 02:39:23 pm
Javy Baez triples off the wall in right to extend his hit-streak to 11 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 15, 2012, 04:16:47 pm
He seems to have pretty nice opposite field power, too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 15, 2012, 04:31:55 pm
Baez 3 for 3 so far, with a single, double and triple.  That brings his average up to 333 in spite of a fairly long slump earlier in the year.

With shortstop a black hole in Iowa, a promotion of Lake to Iowa, Alcantara to Tennessee and Baez to Daytona could be coming.  And if that happens, look for Saunders to be moved up to Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 04:54:45 pm
Baez: 3-4, 2B, 3B, K, CS/PO, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_15_bgrafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 05:09:27 pm
Vitters: 1-5, 2B, RBI, 3 K, E

Jackson: 0-4, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_15_iowaaa_omaaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 05:14:28 pm
Anyone noticed how good Jay Jackson has been since moving into relief?


14 apps, 1.55 ERA, 29 IP, 22 H, 12 BB, 35 K

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 05:23:02 pm
DSL all-star game:


Alcala: 1-1, 2B

Encarnacion: 1-1, BB

Caro: 0-1, BB, K



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_15_dsarok_dsnrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 15, 2012, 05:31:19 pm
fwiw Chris27, I had posted a few days ago about Jay Jackson's success as a reliever. If/when Cubs make some moves in the coming weeks, he may get a look with the big league club.

And DaveP, i like the idea of the short-stop-shuffle. Saunders certainly deserves to get out of arizona (although they have been moving him around defensively, and he's played CF and 3B, so maybe they want to keep him there to work on his defense at a variety of positions to increase his value as a utility type).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 15, 2012, 06:52:04 pm
DSL all-star game:Alcala: 1-1, 2B
Encarnacion: 1-1, BB
Caro: 0-1, BB, K

Interesting which got chosen, and actually how few given how strong are two teams are and how much effective pitching they've gotten.  There are so many players with good numbers, it might almost be kind of random.   But sometimes these picks get made in part based on how somebody looks, not just numbers.  Maybe Caro looks like an amazing CFer, the next Doug Glanville defensively?  I thought it's been interesting that Baez, who seemed to be signed to a big deal as a defense/speed CF type, has played left when he and Caro have both been in the lineup.  Alcala's played a bunch of 1st, but also 3rd.  I wonder if he has any decent defense in his future?   

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 07:35:56 pm
Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_15_jacaax_tenaax_1


Daytona:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_15_chaafa_dbcafa_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 15, 2012, 07:50:18 pm
Logan Watkins is 22, has an OBP of around .369, an OPS around .759.  I believe he's a very good defensive 2B.  I think to some degree he's a Darwin barney style guy, that kind of hustle and alertness.  Obviously faster than Barney, a little more power, a lot more walks, but more K's and less contact skill.  If you love Barney, it may be that Watkins may become a Barney with OBP and speed. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 15, 2012, 08:13:21 pm
Cerda has 36 BBs in 56 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 15, 2012, 11:18:47 pm
Gioskar Amaya was hit in the head with pitch during his first at-bat and left the game.


Candelario: 1-3, RBI, BB, K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_15_vanasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 09:44:06 am
Baez making adjustments:


Quote
He also now has an 11-game hitting streak in which he’s hitting .452 with four home runs and eight RBIs. The success has come with some adjustments at the plate.

“I was being way too long in my swing,” Baez said. “Now I’m working to stay short to the ball and hit it through.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 16, 2012, 11:07:46 am
He's also seeming to use the whole field pretty well.  Seems like he's hitting some HR to CF/RCF, and I think triple and some deep flyouts were also to center.  He might end up loving Wrigley field's dimensions. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 16, 2012, 11:40:32 am
From another board

Javier Baez, SS, Cubs (Low-A Peoria)
Baez was at it again over the weekend, going 7-for-12 with a double, two triples and a home run, lifting his season line to .331/.394/.586 since joining the Chiefs in late May. Expected to be awfully good, Baez has actually exceeded those expectations, earning 70 or higher scouting grades for both his hit and power tools. He's eclipsed Minnesota's Miguel Sano in the eyes of most as the top all-around offensive prospect in the Midwest League, and he's one of the top offensive prospects in any league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 16, 2012, 11:51:04 am
One of the things that's impressed me most about Baez is that he seems to make quick adjustments.

At his previous level, he went on a mini slump, realized he was trying to pull to much, decided to shoot everything up the middle, hit like 0.500 for two weeks and got promoted.

He's doing the same thing now. To identify a problem and rectify it so quickly and completely is not something I've seen in a hitting prospect before.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 16, 2012, 11:52:21 am
If he keeps this up, I'd like to see him at high A by the end of the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 16, 2012, 11:54:48 am
High end AA would be quite a leap, although it isn't unusual to promote a guy the last week of the season just to give him a non-pressure taste.  But I would be surprised if he isn't in Daytona by the beginning of August.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 01:32:13 pm
Soler and Almora are both expected to make their debuts sometime this week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 16, 2012, 01:46:36 pm
RT @peoriachiefs Javier Baez officially named MWL Player of the Week! Hit .478/.500/1.130 with 3HR & 7XBH last week.2 2b, 2 3b, 6rbi,5r, 2sb


RT [/size] (http://twitter.com/BoiseHawksRadio)@BoiseHawksRadio[/url][/size][/color][/size] [/color][/size] (http://twitter.com/BoiseHawks)@BoiseHawks[/url][/size][/color][/size] OF Trey Martin named Northwest League Player of the Week. Hit .545 with 2 HR 7 RBI[/color]
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on July 16, 2012, 02:15:45 pm
Sweet about Almora and Soler.  I can't wait to declare them busts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 02:16:21 pm
Baez: 1-3, SF, 2 RBI, HBP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_bgrafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 02:22:25 pm
Quote
From another board

That writeup is from Kevin Goldstein.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 16, 2012, 02:57:32 pm
Baez: 1-3, SF, 2 RBI, HBP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_bgrafx_peoafx_1

Baez has to be on some kind of record pace for HBP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 16, 2012, 03:03:37 pm
Baez: 1-3, SF, 2 RBI, HBP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_bgrafx_peoafx_1 (http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_bgrafx_peoafx_1)

Chadd Krist got a quick promotion to Peoria and is off to a really fast start there.

Even though he was one of those cheap senior signs in the 9th round, I wonder if the Cubs still view him as an actual prospect and maybe somebody who wasn't totally unworthy of a 9th round pick.  They had him batting cleanup quite a bit in Boise, and he was an All Pac-12 catcher.  He seems like he doesn't have much more than Joe Girardi type upside, but if he can show any hitting ability at all, with his good defensive reputation he seems like he ought to have a shot at the majors, which is a lot more than I expected when we drafted him. 

They've definitely taken plenty of all-glove, no-hit catchers in the Top 10 rounds before who never showed even this level of offensive production in pro ball, at the very least.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 16, 2012, 03:12:14 pm
Krist was also a 13th round pick last season by the White Sox, so that also seems to suggest he has more ability than someone that's being drafted as organization roster filler.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 03:13:32 pm
Quote
Baez has to be on some kind of record pace for HBP.

He's been hit more often than he's drawn walks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on July 16, 2012, 03:15:47 pm
His Senior season was horrid.  .294ba w/ .325 obp.  Previous to that, he was pretty decent, but then again, not as good as Micah Gibbs and we see how that's played out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 16, 2012, 04:08:01 pm
His Senior season was horrid.  .294ba w/ .325 obp.  Previous to that, he was pretty decent, but then again, not as good as Micah Gibbs and we see how that's played out.

Yeah but after the first couple of rounds of the draft, you aren't going to find college catchers who can both hit and field well.  Basically you're either going to draft a catcher who can hit and try to work out the defensive kinks with him (guys like Jake Fox or Mike Amrhein) or draft a catcher who can play defense and hasn't show much ability to hit but may have enough untapped offensive potential that you might be able to realize with coaching, weight training, year round focus on baseball, etc. (guys like Tony Richie, Micah Gibbs, Luis Flores, Ryan Jorgensen, Chris Currey, Warren Hanna, Jake Muyco, etc.)

A guy like Krist definitely falls in the latter, all-glove/no bat category, and like all the other similar catchers we've taken in the past, it's doubtful he'll ever realize anything with his bat.  Still, you never know, and he's shown at least some offensive ability at times, like being the all-time Cal leader in doubles for instance.  Maybe with year round focus on baseball instead of having to devote time to being a student at a university like Cal-Berkeley, you might be able to get the bat to the point where it's passable.  Basically it's that longshot chance that you're hoping on when you draft a guy like that - more scouting/projection than what he actually did with the bat in college. 

I guess my point earlier on Krist is that I thought initially he would have even less potential than the Chris Curry, Warren Hanna, Jake Muyco types in the past because we were more interested in his $10,000 price tag than we were in drafting a 9th round caliber prospect.  I really even thought he was probably viewed as more of an organizational player than someone who we thought had a chance of being a major leaguer.  But he's showing some ability to handle the bat in Peoria in the early going, and that's a lot more than I expected thus far and really more than guys like Muyco or Hanna ever showed at any level of pro ball.   

Those guys were picked as legit Top 15 rounds players in the past, so at least in that regard, it's changing my perception of what Krist is as a prospect. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 16, 2012, 04:13:00 pm
He's been hit more often than he's drawn walks.

Yes.  He's a terrible walker, and hasn't taken a walk yet this month.  But he's got a perfectly decent IsoD of .063 because he gets hit so much.  Fans sometimes mocked Dusty because he truthfully observed that the primary component of OBP was batting average, not walks.  Baez has a .424 OBP this month, with zero walks. 

I wonder about the walks, why they happen and what it means future? 
1.  He's so arrogant that opponents are continuously trying to teach him a lesson?
2.  He just crowds the plate?
3.  With his leg kick, he can't really back off of inside stuff even if he wanted to?
4.  He doesn't want to avoid, he likes to Biggio it and take the HBP.  He might dodge an inside fastball, but if somebody's throwing breaking stuff inside, he just lets them hit him? 
5.  Pure coincidence, and he might go the rest of the year without another HBP? 

I just hope that he isn't getting hit so often that he gets hurt all the time. 

Between walks and HBP combined, he's had 15 in 148 AB, or something like that.  (Not sure if today's game is in the stats yet that I'm looking at.)  If a guy had 15 walks in 148 AB, we'd be very satisfied. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 05:11:52 pm
Quote
Between walks and HBP combined, he's had 15 in 148 AB, or something like that.

16:  7 walks, 9 HBP
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 16, 2012, 05:24:05 pm
One of the things that's impressed me most about Baez is that he seems to make quick adjustments.

At his previous level, he went on a mini slump, realized he was trying to pull to much, decided to shoot everything up the middle, hit like 0.500 for two weeks and got promoted.

He's doing the same thing now. To identify a problem and rectify it so quickly and completely is not something I've seen in a hitting prospect before.

The quick adjustments are impressive enough, but that they are coming in someone so young, and who apparently is not suffering from a swollen head, is even more so.  A September 2013 call-up?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 16, 2012, 05:38:05 pm
If he continues to dominate at each league, he may get a September 13 call up.  But then we will see the same flaws (and the same complaints) that we saw in Castro (and the posters on the board).

Even with a September 13 call up, I doubt that he would break spring training 14 with the major league team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 16, 2012, 05:53:30 pm
Guessing that Cubs will do the extra 7th year gambit with Baez, as they did with Castro.  No September call-up the previous year (because of service time accrual) and a call-up some time after the season begins (to avoid full-season service credit).  It's the norm these days with high-end prospects.  Hope that Baez fits in that category.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 08:42:18 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2B, 2 SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_chaafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 16, 2012, 08:44:45 pm
If he continues to dominate at each league, he may get a September 13 call up.  But then we will see the same flaws (and the same complaints) that we saw in Castro (and the posters on the board).

Even with a September 13 call up, I doubt that he would break spring training 14 with the major league team.

Though Reb makes a good point about service time, I suspect that the primary factor will be how he performs at each level.  I don't think many people thought Baez would be ripping up Peoria quite as aggressively as he is right now.

I think performance at each level was the primary factor for Castro starting 2010 in the minors, and not service time.

In 2009 Castro had a mid-season promotion to AA, and only got into 31 games there, with a BA of .288.  Nice for a 19 year old, but a long way from setting the world on fire.  It did not really warrant a September callup in 2009, and it made sense to start him in the minors in 2010 at age 21.  That is what the Cubs did, and it did not seem to be as a result of service time concerns, but instead developmental concerns.  After 26 games in AA at age 20, and hitting .376 with an OPS of .990, the Cubs called him up, a move which again seemed to be a result of the belief that he was ready, and not out of a concern to game the service time rules.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 09:50:40 pm
Jackson: 1-4, 3B, K

Vitters: 1-4, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_nozaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 16, 2012, 10:23:39 pm
Rademacher with another 3 hits so far, all doubles.  I suspect he will be moving up to Peoria when Soler or Almora move up to Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 16, 2012, 10:28:24 pm
Rademacher with another 3 hits so far, all doubles.  I suspect he will be moving up to Peoria when Soler or Almora move up to Boise.

Almora's a pretty decent bet to stay in Mesa the rest of the summer.  The Cubs typically don't push their high schoolers that hard early on.  I'm not even really sure if I recall any high school players getting to Boise right after the draft.  Then again, with the early sign date, maybe he can do enough to get himself to Boise the last week or two of their season.  I'm guessing Almora plays in Mesa most of this summer, though.

Soler, who knows?  I imagine they'll want to take things really easy with him too early on since he hasn't played much lately, but given his age, maybe they'll want to bump him to Boise before too long.  I wouldn't be surprised if he's in Mesa the rest of the summer too, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 10:28:51 pm
Ha: 3-5, 3B, HR, 2 RBI, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_jacaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 16, 2012, 10:31:29 pm
Looks like the Cubs are finally moving McNutt to relief.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 10:33:16 pm
Rodriguez: 5-2-1-1-1-5

Alcala: 1-4, HR, RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_ddirok_dcurok_1



Acosta: 1-3, 2B, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_dchrok_dyarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 16, 2012, 11:36:14 pm
Candelario: gw-ing HR in 9th; 1-5, HR, RBI, K

Arias: 5-4-3-2-2-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_yakasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2012, 02:30:33 am
Dunston: 2-6, Inside-the-Park HR, 4 RBI, K

Vogelbach: 0-2, RBI, 3 BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_16_cubrok_athrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2012, 02:45:58 am
Bill Mitchell has Almora photos up:

http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/search/search?I_DSC=albert+almora&I_DSC_AND=t&I_CITY=&I_STATE=&I_COUNTRY_ISO=&I_IS_RELEASED=&I_IS_PRELEASED=&I_ORIENTATION=&_CB_I_PR=t&_CB_I_PU=t&_CB_I_RF=t&_CB_I_RM=t&I_SORT=RANK&C_ID=C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ&_ACT=search&F_REFINE=t
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2012, 03:36:04 am
Hunter Ackerman has been promoted to Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 17, 2012, 07:15:57 am
Almora's a pretty decent bet to stay in Mesa the rest of the summer.  The Cubs typically don't push their high schoolers that hard early on.  I'm not even really sure if I recall any high school players getting to Boise right after the draft.  Then again, with the early sign date, maybe he can do enough to get himself to Boise the last week or two of their season.  I'm guessing Almora plays in Mesa most of this summer, though.

Soler, who knows?  I imagine they'll want to take things really easy with him too early on since he hasn't played much lately, but given his age, maybe they'll want to bump him to Boise before too long.  I wouldn't be surprised if he's in Mesa the rest of the summer too, though.

I have gotten the impression that both Almora and Soler are awfully baseball mature, in spite of their ages, so I wouldn't be surprised if Almora and Soler are both quite capable of moving to Boise (or above) quite rapidly, as far as physical ability is concerned.  However, someone mentioned recently that Mesa has the advantages of greater support resources for new players.  So to the extent that the Cubs want to really emphasize certain aspects of how their players approach the game (and life outside the game),  Mesa may be the best place to do that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2012, 08:07:43 am
Daniel Lockhart is slugging .514, and has a .413 OBP.  Jeff suggested a lefty Theriot.  I've got memory baggage with Theriot, but if Lockhart became a LH version of the good Theriot, when he was OBP'ing at .387 and .343, that would be a very good outcome.  Lockhart has 8 XBH in 17 games, and 1/3 of his hits are XBH as a teenager.  Theriot's XBH output in the majors is <20%.  So maybe if Lockhart could become a Theriot with a little more consistent OBP and an extra 30 XBH per year, we might like him a lot. 

Perhaps another imaginary comp might be a lefty Barney, again with the super low k-rates.  Imagine Barney with another 25 walks and another 25 XBH per year?   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 17, 2012, 09:30:26 am
IF Lockhart could field like Barney, WOW!
Of course, Barney has established himself as MLB Gold-Glove calibre...and that's HUGE for a middle infielder...
...which is why Tigers are VERY interested in acquiring Barney (but we won't let him go easily).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 17, 2012, 09:43:06 am
IF Lockhart could field like Barney, WOW!
Of course, Barney has established himself as MLB Gold-Glove calibre...and that's HUGE for a middle infielder...
...which is why Tigers are VERY interested in acquiring Barney (but we won't let him go easily).

C'mon, ben, don't you know the grass is always greener with guys who could be better?  More fun to dream about what could be than to appreciate we have now.   ;)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 17, 2012, 11:44:25 am


Jeimer Candelario's walkoff homer and other Boise highlights

http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/ (http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/)

Quote
Not to go Cole Hamels on anyone, but after watching the “celebration” by Candelario after his home run (which was about as crazy as I’ve ever seen), I wouldn’t be surprise if the Yakima Bears have something “special” for him during tonight’s game.

It was a monster night for Bijan Rademacher, who had three doubles and scored three runs – then found out after the game the hitting .399 in the Northwest League earns a promotion to the Peoria Chiefs, joining teammate Chad Krist, who is hitting .500 after four games in the Midwest League.  To take his place, former College of Idaho All-American Izaac Garsez has been promoted from the Mesa Cubs to take his place.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 17, 2012, 11:47:18 am
Good for Bijan.  It'll be good to find out if his performance in Boise was for real or not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2012, 11:52:04 am
Ron, lets do both!  Enjoying and imagining with some interesting prospect doesn't inherently reflect any non-appreciation of the big-leaguer.  Rizzo has been fantastic, but I look at and enjoy Vogelbach's box score every day because it's fun!  Tracking LaHair's fun season has been great, but didn't preclude very much enjoying Rizzo going nuts at Iowa.  Castro's progress defensively has been fun, but good news on Baez defensively as well as hitting-wise is fun too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 17, 2012, 12:01:35 pm
Ron, lets do both!  Enjoying and imagining with some interesting prospect doesn't inherently reflect any non-appreciation of the big-leaguer.  Rizzo has been fantastic, but I look at and enjoy Vogelbach's box score every day because it's fun!  Tracking LaHair's fun season has been great, but didn't preclude very much enjoying Rizzo going nuts at Iowa.  Castro's progress defensively has been fun, but good news on Baez defensively as well as hitting-wise is fun too.

Amen.  Just continuing my effort to make sure we appreciate what Barney has done, is doing for the Cubs.  He is no Ryan Theriot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2012, 12:07:41 pm
It's a tough road for prospects like Lockhart, if (hpothetically) you don't profile with some power.  You better be very good at some thing(s).  Barney's done it with great defense and an unusual gift for contact. 

The Cubs seem to have assembled and invested in a fair stock of possibly low-power infielders/2B types.  Substantial superslot for Logan Watkins; big money for Silva; I think Lockhart got like $450 or something, not Dunston/Maples but still a non-trivial investment; Torreyes was a significant component of the Marshall deal; last month we Bruno was our 2nd position player drafted; this month we spent $700 of a constrained budget on de la Rosa.  Clevenger was Wilken's 4th pick as a 2B. 

So it seems management has assembled quite a few of these 2B-type guys.  Obviously what they look like now and what they will look like future, or what management projected for them at time of acquisition, can differ.  They projected Cerda as a catcher with perhaps some power.  Maybe they hoped for 60-SB speed from Watkins, or 20-HR power from Silva?  Maybe they project 10-15 HR power for Lockhart down the road, and that much or more for delaRosa?  But I think it will be interesting to see how this collection of quantity develops.  Will any of them emerge with one or two really specially good qualities that can make for a successful career, like Barney has with his defense and contact?  Fun to watch, even if it's doubtful that any will ever become regular contributors for the Cubs. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 17, 2012, 12:20:10 pm

Jeimer Candelario's walkoff homer and other Boise highlights

http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/ (http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/)


That was awesome.  Candelario was jumping and hollering towards his own dugout, which I think should be fine.

Then, when he rounded third, someone from the other team mouthed off.

Hey, here's an idea, if you don't want someone celebrating a walkoff homer, how about you don't give up one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on July 17, 2012, 12:32:18 pm
Amen.  Just continuing my effort to make sure we appreciate what Barney has done, is doing for the Cubs.  He is no Ryan Theriot.

Keep **** that chicken, Ron.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 17, 2012, 12:53:02 pm

Jeimer Candelario's walkoff homer and other Boise highlights

http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/ (http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/)

BAM!!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 17, 2012, 01:18:17 pm
Keep ****ing that chicken, Ron.

Umm... what is Ron doing to the chicken?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2012, 01:33:37 pm
Candelario obviously has a career in pro wrestling waiting for him if baseball doesn't work out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: BullingersEars on July 17, 2012, 01:38:57 pm
That was quite the celebration in Boise... well worth the click if you haven't done so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 17, 2012, 01:51:41 pm
I wonder if the Yakima tempers were a little high from when Rock Shoulders dove headfirst into the catcher in the sixth inning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 17, 2012, 01:59:29 pm
Quote
The suspension of Dominican righthander Juan Carlos Paniagua ends on July 19. He is one player the Cubs have been tied to and he could cost more than the $1.1 million the Yankees were going to give him in 2011.
Ben Badler of BA, some weeks back. 


Quote
Throwing around 30 pitches on May 1, Paniagua sat in the 93-95 mph range with his lively fastball.  He showed a 78-81 mph chaneup and mixed in a couple 77-78 mph curveballs.  But, after his fastball, his most impressive pitch might be his slider.  When Paniagua signed with the Yankees, scouts said his slider was a slurvy pitch and lagged behind his fastball and changeup, but today he showed a nasty 81-84 mph slider with sharp, late tilt.


Paniagua is every bit of his listed 6-foot-1 and 195 pounds.  He showed good rhythm and balance in his deliverey and was around the strike zone with all of his pitches.  Before this outing, Paniagua last threw in front of scouts on March 28 at Palm Beach (Fla.) CC.  He spent this offseason playing winter ball in Panama, where he had a 5.09 ERA in 17 2/3 innings with 18 strikeouts and 9 walks.
  BA


 
Quote
  When Paniagua had signed with the Diamondbacks, he was a raw arm who had been throwing around 88-90 mph, touching 92. During his suspension, Paniagua joined one of the top academies in the Dominican Republic, the Arias and Goodman academy run by Alfredo Arias and Gary Goodman. Their players last year included Astros outfielder Ariel Ovando ($2.6 million), Mariners outfielder Phillips Castillo ($2.2 million), Cubs third baseman Jeimer Candelario ($500,000) and Yankees righthander Reynaldo Polanco ($450,000), among others.While training at the Arias and Goodman academy during his suspension, Paniagua's velocity skyrocketed. Multiple scouts who have seen Paniagua recently reported that he sat around 93-95 mph and touched 98. Some scouts said they had heard Paniagua may have even topped out even higher, though Baseball America could not confirm those reports.Paniagua's situation is similar to that of Dominican righthander Carlos Martinez (previously known as Carlos Matias), whose low six-figure agreement with the Red Sox was voided when he was suspended for fraud. While he was suspended, Martinez's fastball shot up and he started throwing up to 99 mph. Since Martinez's contract with the Red Sox never received official league approval, Martinez was able to become a free agent after he finished his suspension last year, then signed with the Cardinals for $1.5 million last April.
Some pretty strong rumors that the Cubs will sign this Dominican pitcher once he gets off the fraud-suspension list. 
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on July 17, 2012, 02:07:36 pm
looks like Gretzky has yet to get his slap shot down yet
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 17, 2012, 02:18:53 pm
  Some pretty strong rumors that the Cubs will sign this Dominican pitcher once he gets off the fraud-suspension list. 
 


What was the fraud?  Age/identification?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 17, 2012, 02:31:29 pm
As far as the Candelario homer here's something Ive learned as a coach...

Everybody gets along till they get beat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 17, 2012, 03:19:47 pm
Candelario will likely wear one tonight, and he should...

Hope it's in the ribs or butt, and he takes it like a man...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 17, 2012, 03:51:31 pm
Umm... what is Ron doing to the chicken?

Asterisking it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 17, 2012, 03:51:53 pm
I hear chickens hate it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 17, 2012, 04:09:56 pm
I hear chickens hate it.

Everybody knows chickens only have one asterisk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2012, 09:00:42 pm
Szczur: 3-4, 2 RBI

Loosen: 7-1/3 -5-1-1-3-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_17_chaafa_dbcafa_1


Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_17_jacaax_tenaax_1


Peoria off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 17, 2012, 09:09:32 pm
Rubi Silva is 7 for 23 in steals this year.  That's got to be one of the worst percentages I've ever seen.

Maybe this guy doesn't need to try to steal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2012, 09:20:32 pm
Candelario was hit in the first inning tonight.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 17, 2012, 09:40:14 pm
Candelario was hit in the first inning tonight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1DEG6BWgp0&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL91BAE31279A40F1A
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 17, 2012, 09:43:14 pm
Szczur: 3-4, 2 RBI

Loosen: 7-1/3 -5-1-1-3-6

Torreyes was also 2 for 4 in that game and up to .253.  Looks like he's starting to figure out High-A.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 17, 2012, 09:44:48 pm
If Torreyes keeps things up, we might need to have yet another "Who was the key to the Marshall trade?" debate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2012, 09:51:19 pm
Jackson: 2-5, 2B, SB, E

Vitters: 2-4, RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_17_nozaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 17, 2012, 10:50:11 pm
Vogelbach with a home run and a triple so far tonight.  I still think he will be in Boise quite soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2012, 11:11:09 pm
Martin: 3-3, HR, RBI, 2 BB

Shoulders: 2-3, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_17_yakasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 17, 2012, 11:51:14 pm
Vogelbach: 2-5, 3B, HR, 3 RBI

Dunston: 2-4, BB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_17_cubrok_mrnrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 12:26:33 am
Acosta: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_17_dyarok_dchrok_1


Emeterio: 2-4, RBI, K, 3 E

Paulino: 3-1/3 -5-5-4-3-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_17_dcurok_ddirok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 18, 2012, 12:34:16 am
Vogelbach slugging .779.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 01:21:48 am
And absolutely no future as a Cub unless Rizzo morphs into a left-handed catcher or something.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2012, 01:33:17 am
Rizzo could be hit by a truck.  No team can depend totally on one particular player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2012, 08:01:55 am
If Torreyes keeps things up, we might need to have yet another "Who was the key to the Marshall trade?" debate.

Not really.  That issue was really resolved before the season started by anyone looking at the stats and scouting reports of the players involved.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2012, 08:07:53 am
Vogelbach slugging .779.

Heh.  I often figure that if a prospect is getting 1/3 of his hits for XB, that's a decent ratio.  Vogelbach instead is almost 2/3.  Of his 31 hits, 20 have been for extras.  Wow. 

In the 20 years or so that I've tracked the draft/farm, Choi and Dopirak have been the only two guys where a big bonus or a high draft pick were used, prior to Vogelbach.  We just never drafted 1B's to play 1B.  It is somewhat bittersweet that we may perhaps finally have drafted a 1B who's a special hitter (hopefully), but he may be blocked (hopefully.  I'm hoping that Dave's truck doesn't hit Rizzo). 

Sure is fun to track those box scores, though. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 08:18:23 am
The Reds had Yonder Alonso blocked at first base because of Joey Votto, so they included him in a trade for a young top of the rotation pitcher in Mat Latos.  The Phillies had Jonathan Singleton blocked at first base because of Ryan Howard, so they included him in a trade for Hunter Pence.

Vogelbach is 3-4 years away anyway at the very minimum, and hopefully in 3-4 years, the Cubs will be good enough to start trading prospects to help the big league team again.  Maybe Vogelbach gets included in a trade for a proven young player like Latos or Pence like other teams have done down the road if Rizzo doesn't get hit by a truck or whatever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 18, 2012, 09:46:02 am
Or perhaps the National League adopts Designated Hitters...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 18, 2012, 09:46:35 am
What JR said.

OR, if he somehow turned out to be better than Rizzo, that would be OK too. The Cubs could trade Rizzo.  ;)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2012, 10:15:51 am
And absolutely no future as a Cub unless Rizzo morphs into a left-handed catcher or something.

From about 1959 thru 1966 the Giants had two great hitting and decent to good fielding firstbasemen, neither of whom should ever have played a single inning in the OF, but the Giants regularly played one at 1B and the other in the OF, and made it to the WS one year with the two of them.

Could be some rather interesting games on days when the wind would be blowing out in Wrigley....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2012, 11:04:56 am
As Jes said, if a guy is a good enough hitter, a team will find a place to play him.  If Hank Sauer could play left field (or Soriano) then so can Rizzo or Vogelbach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 11:10:33 am
Vogelbach in the outfield? You know that's not going to happen, Dave.

It's first base or bust in the NL for Vogs. Heartbreaking really.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 18, 2012, 11:20:01 am
Vogelbach in the outfield? You know that's not going to happen, Dave.

It's first base or bust in the NL for Vogs. Heartbreaking really.

Another reason for the NL to adopt the DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 11:21:20 am
As Jes said, if a guy is a good enough hitter, a team will find a place to play him.  If Hank Sauer could play left field (or Soriano) then so can Rizzo or Vogelbach.

I'm not sure that's always true.  If Rizzo establishes himself as an All-Star caliber first baseman, he's probably locked in there regardless.  There are exceptions, but for the most part, if a player has established himself as an All-Star and he's held down that position for several years, that player is rarely asked to move to make room for someone else.

If Rizzo has locked down first base for the Cubs and has established himself as a franchise player, we likely won't be asking him to move for Vogelbach, and Vogelbach is a guy who sounds like he's totally incapable of playing the outfield (and some people have said he's not going to end up being very capable at first either). 

More than likely if Vogelbach establishes himself as a premium prospect, we'll likely be making a trade for another premium young player, which would not be a heartbreaking reality.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 11:23:00 am
Of course, we're a long long ways away from having this "problem".  Success in Mesa for Vogelbach is not exactly any guarantee of future success down the road.  And of course, Rizzo could get run over by a truck, have Rafael Furcal run over him at first base, or may be subscribing to cable instead of Direct TV.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2012, 11:33:51 am
Some of you traditionalists hate it.  But I have to admit I'd be very in favor of adding designated hitter.  Hitting is fun.  Having an extra significant bat in the lineup is fun, and reduces probably boring innings.  (When it's 7-8-9 coming up, I don't expect a lot of thrill; and if the first guy makes an out, the inning loses interest fast.)  Managers do plenty of pitcher switches already.  It wouldn't kill to have less.  The board often fusses about Cubs bunting too much.  Maybe if pitchers weren't doing it, it would be easier to forget about bunting almost altogether?  Most fundamentally, the DH helps with team-building, and Vogelbach is a nice case.  It really would be nice to be able to do like AL teams do, and scout and acquire a player just because you think he might become a really good hitter.  Vogelbach perhaps blocked; Vitters perhaps not too hot at 3B and who knows if he'd be even playable in left; Soriano; LaHair.  It would be nice to have a DH spot for guys like that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 18, 2012, 11:44:33 am
Another reason for the NL to adopt the DH.

The first being that everyone involved in baseball has completely lost their minds?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 18, 2012, 12:07:46 pm
Some pretty routine Boise highlights from Tuesday night

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8PjKL3v9pY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8PjKL3v9pY)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 18, 2012, 12:11:57 pm
I don't like the DH either. But:

1. The Players' Association would never, ever give up the DH without a long strike.

2. Larry Bud will continue his efforts to homogenize the game of baseball.

3. Several NL owners appear to be in favor of adding the DH so they could match contract offers for players like Pujols and Fielder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2012, 12:16:33 pm
Vogelbach in the outfield? You know that's not going to happen, Dave.

It's first base or bust in the NL for Vogs. Heartbreaking really.

You think Willie McCovey of Orlando Cepeda were able to play LF?

Or Frank Howard?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 18, 2012, 12:25:19 pm
The first being that everyone involved in baseball has completely lost their minds?

No, the first being that American League teams have an advantage when it comes to signing players long-term.

Once a player reaches free agency, AL teams can offer him a longer contract because they can slide an aging but productive player into the DH spot if/when he becomes a defensive liability.  NL teams don't have that option.

I used to be dead-set against the DH but I've come around on it.

Also, during inter-league play and the World Series, when the DH is used, NL teams are at a huge disadvantage because they're using a starting-level player as opposed to a bench-level player.  That advantage doesn't come close to evening out when the rules are reversed.

Plus, all the stuff craig said.

AND, it's just silly to have the two leagues playing with different rules.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 18, 2012, 12:33:30 pm
I'd love it if no one had the DH, but that will never happen. Eliminating the DH slot kills a very well-paid position. So if we're going to have it, we should ALL have it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2012, 12:34:57 pm
Also, during inter-league play and the World Series, when the DH is used, NL teams are at a huge disadvantage because they're using a starting-level player as opposed to a bench-level player.  That advantage doesn't come close to evening out when the rules are reversed.

If true, you would expect the AL to have a significant edge in the WS since the adoption of the DH.

Is that the case?

I don't know.  Let's look.  The AL adopted the DH in 1973.  38 WS since then.  I believe the AL has won 21 and the NL 16.

Looks like a clear edge to me, and I'm an NL fan.

And I still would oppose adopting the DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2012, 12:51:02 pm
I really don't think it's that fun to watch guys like Frank Castillo or Matt Garza or Volstad hit.  Do you? 

It's a lot more fun to see a fair challenge between a big-league pitcher battling a big-league hitter. 

Plus not only does having pitcher-who-can't-hit make their AB's bad, but it also kinda makes a lot of bad AB's for the #8 hitter. 

I know pro-DH people like the extra complexities and hassles associated, that's the point.  But it does hassle lineup construction.  We've got prime prospect Corey Patterson.  Don't want him hitting first because he's a hacker, but don't want him hitting 8th either because he's a hacker.  A lot easier to glide a prospect into the majors in a DH league. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2012, 12:54:07 pm
Theo knows that offense and defense both count. 
1.  He offered Nomar a massive contract prior to trading him to the Cubs for good-D Mientkiowicz (or however it was spelled) and the good-defense SS.  I'm sure his evaluation of Nomar's defense didn't just change overnight.  At the one point, his bat was worth the trouble; but then later the defense was important enough to sacrifice Nomar's bat.   
2.  The centerpieces of Theo's world series champions were basically two should-be-DH's, Manny Ramirez and David Ortiz. Theo kept Manny in LF because his amazing bat outweight his rotten defense.  And offered him massive contract dollars to continue to butcher LF but continue hitting like one of the best hitters of my lifetime. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 18, 2012, 12:55:22 pm
The DH is not real baseball, period.  Just because half the league doesn't play real baseball that doesn't mean the rest of the league should follow suit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 18, 2012, 01:03:11 pm
Yeah, but when it puts the rest of the league at a competitive disadvantage...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 18, 2012, 01:05:30 pm
The DH is not real baseball, period.  Just because half the league doesn't play real baseball that doesn't mean the rest of the league should follow suit.

Check back in after Rizzo and Votto sign long-term deals to play in the AL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 01:06:33 pm
Quote
You think Willie McCovey of Orlando Cepeda were able to play LF?

Or Frank Howard?


Times are different now. Players in general are much more athletic than they were then. It's not like those players listed were blocking far more athletic defenders. The Cubs already have prospects like Jackson, Szczur, Soler and Almora destined for the outfield, so something tells me the Cubs aren't going to be making Vogelbach one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 18, 2012, 01:11:13 pm
Agree with Chris.  Unless something happens to Rizzo, Vogelbach won't play 1B (much less OF) for the Cubs.  Hopefully, he'll become a terrific trading chip (assuming no DH in the NL).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2012, 01:11:33 pm
Orlando Cepeda DID play left field.   He was a far better first baseman, but he did play in left a lot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2012, 01:21:26 pm
You think Willie McCovey of Orlando Cepeda were able to play LF?

Or Frank Howard?

If Manny Ramirez can play there, anyone can play there, if his bat is good enough to overcome his defensive deficiencies.

And from what I have heard of Vogelbach, he is more of a Kieth Moreland than a Willie McCovey as far as speed is concerned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 18, 2012, 01:28:41 pm
Don't count your prospects before they hatch.  Where to play Vogelbach is a problem that may never materialize and is at least several years off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 18, 2012, 01:29:17 pm
It's much more productive to rip on/defend Darwin Barney.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 18, 2012, 01:29:49 pm
BUT VOGELBACKHF IS SLG EIGHTHUNDREDDDD!!! SURE TO B STAR!!!1!1 :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 18, 2012, 01:37:53 pm
And that's very cool.  Like craig says, fun to watch.  (Thanks, Chris!)

Hand-wringing over where he's going to play is a problem for down the road.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 01:40:45 pm
Hand-wringing over where he's going to play is a problem for down the road.

And should not detract from our enjoyment (or disappointment) of watching him develop as a prospect one bit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2012, 01:42:54 pm
...The Cubs already have prospects like Jackson, Szczur, Soler and Almora destined for the outfield, so something tells me the Cubs aren't going to be making Vogelbach one.

Fun to have some athletic outfielders in the system who have the potential to be good hitters too. 

You only need one 1B, but you need three OFers.  I'm obviously an optimist, so I hope three or all four of those guys work out.  But the odds aren't very good that you end up with three good starting outfielders out of that pool of only four names.  And Jackson is the only one above A-Ball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 18, 2012, 01:45:08 pm
Same old tired pro-DH arguments have been recycled for years.  There's no point in engaging in this circle-jerk again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2012, 01:48:33 pm
The Giants at that time had Mays in CF, and all three of the Alou brothers, all of whom were pretty good prospects, as well as Jose Cardenal.  All three of those got moved (or in the case of Jesus sat the bench) while the Giants continued playing a firstbaseman in LF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 18, 2012, 01:49:09 pm
If one DH is good, why not two or three?  You've got a slick fielding shortstop who can't hit a lick?  No problem, he doesn't come to the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 01:57:09 pm
I suppose if Volgelbach lost another 40 pounds the idea of playing OF could at least be entertained. Maybe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 02:21:22 pm
Szczur: 1-4, K, CS


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_18_chaafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2012, 03:09:20 pm
If one DH is good, why not two or three?  You've got a slick fielding shortstop who can't hit a lick?  No problem, he doesn't come to the plate.

That is the SH, the special hitter, which will be introduced in 2020, the year before the PPH, the permanent pitch hitter, the guy who can enter the game at any time as long as men are on base and hit as often as the manager wishes.   Hitting, hitting, hitting.  In 2025, all games will just be home run hitting contests because hitting is so much fun to watch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 18, 2012, 03:13:45 pm
That is the SH, the special hitter, which will be introduced in 2020, the year before the PPH, the permanent pitch hitter, the guy who can enter the game at any time as long as men are on base and hit as often as the manager wishes.   Hitting, hitting, hitting.  In 2025, all games will just be home run hitting contests because hitting is so much fun to watch.
And then there is the PPR who can run for any hitter at any time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2012, 03:21:06 pm
In 2026 the game will alter again when the ball will be simply placed on a tee, because hitting a pitch thrown from behind second base, the new mound position, is just too damb hard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2012, 03:25:31 pm
Half of the 30 no-hitters since 2000 have been in the AL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 18, 2012, 03:28:41 pm
Half of the 30 no-hitters since 2000 have been in the AL.
That's because AL pitchers can sit and relax in the dugout instead of going to the plate and maybe having to run the bases.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 03:33:50 pm
I suppose if Volgelbach lost another 40 pounds the idea of playing OF could at least be entertained. Maybe.

Hell, I'm sure we'd all be entertained by watching Vogelbach play the outfield right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 03:34:41 pm
That is the SH, the special hitter, which will be introduced in 2020, the year before the PPH, the permanent pitch hitter, the guy who can enter the game at any time as long as men are on base and hit as often as the manager wishes.   Hitting, hitting, hitting.  In 2025, all games will just be home run hitting contests because hitting is so much fun to watch.

If we introduce the SH, maybe people would appreciate Darwin Barney more!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 18, 2012, 03:54:57 pm
And from what I have heard of Vogelbach, he is more of a Kieth Moreland than a Willie McCovey as far as speed is concerned.
[/quote]

Keith Moreland had 14 triples in 5082 plate appearances. Vogelbach already has two.

Two years ago, Vogelbach was just a fat kid playing high school ball. Between his junior and senior year, he dropped from around 290 to around 250, and was a second-round draft pick. IIRC, he reported to camp this year around 240. It's at least possible he'll get down to 215 or 225 before he reaches Chicago. So there's at least some hope that he'll be able to move to the outfield.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2012, 04:09:38 pm
That's because AL pitchers can sit and relax in the dugout instead of going to the plate and maybe having to run the bases.

It was my intent to show that the goofy DH doesn't guarantee more hitting.  The AL tolerates some weaker position players than the NL can afford to do.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2012, 04:27:29 pm
I suppose if Volgelbach lost another 40 pounds the idea of playing OF could at least be entertained. Maybe.

John Kruk played the OF, though he did not make the All-Star until he moved to 1B.

Frank Howard played the OF, and made the All-Star team 4 straight years as an OFer.

Matt Stairs started for the Cubs as an OFer.

And Greg Luzinski made the All-Star team four straight years as an OFer.

Ideal for Vogelbach in the OF?

Not at all, but also entirely doable, and I suspect that before the end of next year, Vogelbach will start seeing some playing time there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 04:36:33 pm
This Vogelbach/OF discussion is making me yearn for the "How great/awful is Darwin Barney?" and the "Who was the key to the Sean Marshall trade?" debates.

Of course, when the Cubs are 36-53 on the season, I guess these are the kind of discussions we're limited to nowadays.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2012, 04:52:19 pm
Didn't you start all of those debates, snot-nose?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 18, 2012, 04:55:37 pm
Iowa has put Randy Wells on the DL with a right elbow strain.

How long before he goes to see that doctor in Alabama?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 18, 2012, 04:58:13 pm
I think several posters on here thought he needed surgery last year.  (I wasn't one of them...just giving credit.)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 18, 2012, 05:15:14 pm
I think br felt that Wells' performance hinted of an injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 05:31:00 pm
Vogelbach is listed at 250 on the milb website. Kruk was never near that big as a player and I don't think Stairs was either.  I didn't see Frank Howard play but he's listed at 6-7, 255. Perhaps he was a statue but that is a completely different body type than what Vogelbach has.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 18, 2012, 05:41:29 pm
I think br felt that Wells' performance hinted of an injury.
:) :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 18, 2012, 06:13:57 pm
RT @ESPNChiCubs Soler to DH in AZ league tomorrow. First game action. Almora not ready for games yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 18, 2012, 07:11:37 pm
I didn't see Frank Howard play but he's listed at 6-7, 255. Perhaps he was a statue...

Bingo.

"Body type" is only part of the picture.  Vogelbach moves reasonably well.  No reason to believe he (or Rizzo) could not play the OF.

At least no reason YET.  If they get some time out there are are utterly immobile (and Frank Howard was close to that) and incapable of being remotely tolerable, then they can't, but my point is that others, many of them, who would not seem close to ideally suited to play the OF, have often done so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2012, 07:30:05 pm
http://billmitchell.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/AZL-Cubs-2012/G0000DyZFTZbJ82g/I0000opWT6ZIs80U/C0000cCXdjc.UyUQ

The linked picture of Vogelbach, I'm not sure he looks like 250 pounds to me, but I dunno.  He doesn't look like he's got a beer-belly or anything like that.  He just looks like he's got a massive barrel-chested ribcage. 

And he looks like he's got short legs that would not be very fast at hauling the upper barrel around.  Hard to imagine having much outfield range.  Or arm either? 

I don't think Vogelbach in outfield is relevant.  I think that's vanishingly unlikely.  The issue of whether he's overweight or fat, I'm not sure I'm thinking that applies at present.  Although it must have been very true at one point, and guys who are 40 pounds overweight at one point have a hard time keeping it off forever.  Although obviously whether he's fat or not, thequestion of what he can actually do at a big-league level defensively is very relevant.  The same body that makes for a short swing with great power might also be a configuration that just can't range or might not have any flexibility or ability to get down on ground balls. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 07:34:03 pm
Quote
Vogelbach moves reasonably well.  No reason to believe he (or Rizzo) could not play the OF.

Baseball America 2012 Cubs Top 10:

"Vogelbach's bat will have to carry him because he lacks athleticism and speed. He has gotten in better shape since carrying 280 pounds on the showcase circuit in 2010, but he may never be more than an average defender and won't be a factor on the bases."

Baseball America 2011 Draft Scouting Report:

"Vogelbach is limited to first base and may be limited to the American League . . . "

"Vogelbach has work to do physically and will never be thought of as athletic."

Kevin Goldstein:

"At just 6 feet tall and somewhere around 250 pounds, Vogelbach is the definition of a bat-only process, as he's a 20 runner on the 20-80 scouting scale and a poor defender."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 07:35:24 pm
The linked picture of Vogelbach, I'm not sure he looks like 250 pounds to me, but I dunno. 

Keith Law:

"Vogelbach lost 30 pounds this winter and a scouting director told me, '...and he's still fat.'"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 07:42:23 pm
I don't trust Goldstein when it comes to Vogelbach. Players who are a 20 on the running scale don't rack up 4 triples in 150 at-bats as Vogelbach has this year going back to EST.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 18, 2012, 07:47:10 pm
They can when the opposition outfielders are 20 defenders.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2012, 07:51:14 pm
Were the 4 triples all against 20 defenders.  What are their names?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 07:51:37 pm
Yeah there's so much screwy crap that goes on in the Arizona League that you can take that with a grain of salt.

I think the park they play in is pretty deep too, so hitting one over the head over some lousy outfielders can probably result in triples even for really below average runners.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 07:57:13 pm
JFYI, Arizona League hitters average a triple for every 58 AB the last two years.

Major League hitters average a triple for every 180 AB in 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2012, 08:00:04 pm
Vogelbach leads the team in triples.  Is he the only one that bats against these lousy outfielders?

ArizonaPhil has said on more than one occasion that Vogelbach is much faster than his physique would indicate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 08:01:52 pm
In two different scouting reports, Perfect Game said Vogelbach moves well for his size and has good straight away speed for his size, running a 7.15  60-yard dash. Both of those comments were made in 2010 prior to his weight loss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 08:02:58 pm
Vogelbach leads the team in triples.

No he doesn't either.  Lockhart has 4, Garsez has 3, and Vogelbach has 2 in the regular season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 18, 2012, 08:04:14 pm
saying he runs well for a fat man is like saying someone sings well for being tone deaf.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2012, 08:12:29 pm
Rademacher is two for three so far, including a double.

Time to promote him to daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2012, 08:44:17 pm
Doesn't look like being hit in the head with a pitch did any lasting injury to Amaya.  Home run in his first at bat today.  I think that is his fourth of the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 18, 2012, 08:58:43 pm
Timothy Saunders played for Daytona today. Was that his first game in high A (he had been in Arizona)? Seems like an aggressive promotion for a guy from a D3 school (albeit the 2 time defending national champion, and he was a 2 time all-american).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2012, 09:03:10 pm
That was his first game at Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 18, 2012, 09:07:32 pm
Timothy Saunders played for Daytona today. Was that his first game in high A (he had been in Arizona)? Seems like an aggressive promotion for a guy from a D3 school (albeit the 2 time defending national champion, and he was a 2 time all-american).

That's kind of interesting.  Not sure if he's just filling in for injury in Daytona, but since he wouldn't get playing time with Boise (Amaya, Hernandez, Candelario) or Peoria (DeVoss, Baez, Geiger) and wasn't getting challenged in Mesa at all, I guess they just decided to send him all the way up to Daytona to see what would happen.

I'm kind of glad to see some aggressive promotions to full season leagues for these guys.  You just cannot tell absolutely anything on whether a guy can actually play when he's in Mesa or Boise.  The competition is horrible, and for college players, you're facing roughly the same caliber of competition or less than you were facing in college.

If you go from the draft to handling Peoria or Daytona right away, though, that's pretty interesting.  That's a pretty good sized jump from short season and college ball.  With Saunders and Rademacher, especially, you can't tell if it's a fluke or not when they're hitting in Mesa or Boise.  If they hit in Peoria or Daytona, though, that definitely puts them on the prospect radar for me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2012, 09:27:41 pm
Vitters has struck out 11 times in his last 5 games.  Very substantial slump.  His game is contact, with some power.  But not happening lately.  May be the kind of thing that happens when a guy starts thinking about callup or swinging too hard?   

Saunders is up to replace Alcantara who's on Daytona's DL.  He's 22 years old, and his best chance is probably as a utility guy.  If you're actually good, here's a challenge, let's see if you're productive beyond Mesa. 

Raley, 7 shutout innings before Jackson comes in and blows the save.  Raley's ERA is now down to 3.18.  He's allowed 5 earned runs over his last 6 starts and 38 innings.  That's pretty good work in the PCL. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 18, 2012, 09:33:15 pm
Saunders is 22 years old, so he is not young for the league (inexperienced, certainly).  I don't know what the philosophy is for the new administration, but in the past, when relative unknowns received surprising promotions, it was generally a sign that they didn't think that much of him, and were willing to "throw him to the wolves", so to speak.  On the other hand, if he does well for Daytona, it will certainly move him up on most prospect lists.  The same applies to Rademacher, although with him they at least made his promotions one step at a time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 18, 2012, 09:38:03 pm
Those thoughts on Saunders certainly make sense. My first thought when I saw his name in the Daytona box score was pretty much the same -- alright, kid, sink or swim.  But, man, he really hit the crap out of the ball in Arizona. If nothing else, he'll always have that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 10:22:39 pm
Baez: 2-5, 2B

Rosario: left in the 3rd w/ possible arm injury


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_18_peoafx_wmiafx_1


Smokies off
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 10:39:12 pm
Jackson: 1-5, 2B, BB, K

Vitters: 0-6, 4 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_18_nozaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 18, 2012, 10:45:08 pm
Rough night for Josh Vitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 11:30:18 pm
Amaya: 2-3, HR, RBI, 2 BB, K

Candelario: 2-5, 2 RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_18_yakasx_boiasx_1


Vogelbach: 0-4, K

Prieto: 2-0-0-0-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_18_dodrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 18, 2012, 11:32:12 pm
Acosta: 1-3, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_18_dchrok_dgirok_1


DSL-1 suspended.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 18, 2012, 11:42:12 pm
Amaya, nice.  Nice to see Prieto with a good outing.  Good for him. 

A guy at the Peoria game in West Michican said Rosario was 91-94 early, but then had an arm injury in the 3rd. 

He said Austin Reed hit 100 on one pitch, and then later expanded the following:
Quote
I'm guessing he has a 2 seamer and a 4 seamer? He had one he threw 91-93, and one that was consistently 94-96, hitting 97 a couple of times, and a low 80's off speed pitch. he really needed the K, and reared back. It did look like he put a little more into it than the times he'd throw 97.   I don't know that the gun was the most accurate, but based on prior experience, it's fairly close. I wasn't in a position to go sit behind Wang, Cates, Antigua, and I think Jensen taking turns manning the gun.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 19, 2012, 12:07:40 am
Cubs' minor-leaguers test positive for PEDs

July, 18, 2012
7:57 PM CT
By Associated Press

NEW YORK -- Chicago Cubs minor-league right-handers Juancito De La Cruz and Antonio Encarnacion have been suspended 50 games each for violating baseball's minor league drug program.

The commissioner's office announced Wednesday that De La Cruz and Encarnacion both tested positive for metabolites of Stanozolol.

Both players are on the roster of the Dominican Summer League Cubs, and their suspensions are effective immediately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 19, 2012, 09:23:02 am
Boise highlights from Wednesday night

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_Vi-wMUSDc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2012, 11:49:52 am
Probably shouldn't post this for fear of the normal Cub letdown but.....


Quote
Jon Heyman ‏@JonHeymanCBS

scout on jorge soler: "hes going to be a monster.'' (thats a good thing, btw) ‪#cubs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on July 19, 2012, 02:10:07 pm
So, not only is he going to suck at baseball but he's going to attack Tokyo.  Still a better signing than Concepcion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2012, 06:22:24 pm
Moved up to 3rd in the batting order, Javy Baez hits a homerun in the first to extend his hit-streak to 14.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 19, 2012, 06:40:27 pm
Cubs Sign Dominican Pitcher Juan Carlos Paniagua for $1.5 Million
By Brett on July 19, 2012

Busy news night.

Today, the Chicago Cubs made a *huge* international signing, inking 22-year-old righty Juan Carlos Paniagua to a $1.5 million deal. The 22-year-old righty has a fastball that can touch 98 mph, but is typically in the mid-90s. He’s got a quality slider, and a good changeup.

That the Cubs gave him $1.5 million – more than half of their $2.9 million bonus pool for the 2012-13 international signing period, speaks to how highly they think of him (and how desperate they are for young pitching).

But there is a little more to the Paniagua story.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/07/cubs-sign-juan-carlos-paniagua-for-1-5-million/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 19, 2012, 06:50:04 pm
Only two signings this month have been higher than $1.5, a $1.55 pitcher and a $1.75 SS.  That's a huge bundle when everybody's capped at $2.9.  I wonder how many other teams even had that much left to bid? 

Hope he works out.  That's a way different landscape, 22-years-old like a college senior, but with apparently almost no game-pitching experience.  Not like your normal 16-17-year-old Dominican signing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 19, 2012, 06:54:35 pm
Well, let's hope his paperwork is in order this time. I was hoping for Luiz Gohara, but that won't happen now. The Cubs are down to $700K in the IFA piggy bank.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 19, 2012, 06:59:08 pm
With a cap of $2.9 on international signings, and with all international contract offers getting pushed way down as a result, a team could blow through the cap and sign all of the top international talent one season, without spending an obscene amount of money and they taking a hit the following year, but it might well be worth it if you scarffed up enough top talent the budget busting season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 19, 2012, 07:18:23 pm
Baez adds a double. 


Szczur has 3 hits including a triple, he's up to .288.  OPS probably up to .790 for the moment. 


Nice
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2012, 07:26:51 pm
Jose Rosario's injury is being called an arm strain what ever that means.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 19, 2012, 07:43:03 pm
Jose Rosario's injury is being called an arm strain what ever that means.

It means he'll be throwing a towel.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 19, 2012, 07:47:58 pm
Not that baseballamerica knows everything, but I was concerned when I noticed they don't list Paniagua in their top 20 international prospects list. Turns out players previously suspended were not included on the list.

I wonder where they would have ranked Paniagua had he been eligible.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2012, 08:23:50 pm
Ben Badler doesn't seem to think Paniagua will pitch this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2012, 08:52:25 pm
Alcala: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI,    Last 6 games = 14-26, 2B, 4 HR, 11 RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_19_dcurok_dwsrok_1



Acosta: 2-3, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_19_dgirok_dchrok_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2012, 08:53:54 pm
Szczur: 3-4, 3B, RBI, SB, CS, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_19_dbcafa_jupafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 19, 2012, 09:25:26 pm
In the last 10 games Torreys is hitting .317/.349/.739 and for the month it is .315/.377/.784.  For June it was .330/.400/   .923
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2012, 09:32:23 pm
Baez: 2-4, 2B, HR, RBI, SB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_19_peoafx_wmiafx_1


Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_19_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 19, 2012, 09:51:07 pm
Szczur: 3-4, 3B, RBI, SB, CS, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_19_dbcafa_jupafa_1

Chris, much as I value your posts on the minor league teams and how the top prospects do, with Szczur, his RBI are probably never going to be very important with him, but his runs scored certainly will be.  He has 29 RBI and 63 runs scored in 71 games. He may be batting 3rd in Daytona, but he is a leadoff kind of guy, and what is important with him is getting on base, stealing and scoring.  He had one RBI in that game, but the run he scored was more important in evaluating him.  You might consider with Szczur listing runs scored instead of RBI.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2012, 10:13:21 pm
Quote
You might consider with Szczur listing runs scored instead of RBI.

I don't list runs scored for anyone because, while interesting, it's a stat almost as much in the hands of teammates as the player himself.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 19, 2012, 10:52:56 pm
Jackson: 2-4, SF, RBI, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_19_nozaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 12:11:58 am
Amaya: 0-2, 2 BB, K

Candelario: 0-2, 2 BB, K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_19_boiasx_eugasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 12:34:27 am
Soler goes 0-3 in his debut. He did line out hard to the pitcher resulting in a DP as Vogelbach was doubled off.


Vogelbach: 0-3, 2 BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_19_mrnrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 12:36:42 am
Article on Soler and Almora.  Hoyer want Soler to play in the AFL.

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/The-Jorge-Soler-Watch-begins-now?blockID=743161&feedID=10336
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 01:02:00 am
Brett Jackson evaluates his season:

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20120719/SPORTS/307190106/1003/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+desmoinesregister%2FSports+%28DesMoinesRegister.com+-+SPORTS%29
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 20, 2012, 08:52:54 am
Chris, thanks for the excellent articles re Soler/Almora and re Jackson.

The Jackson article is particularly interesting...what a sharp young man!  He said EXACTLY what one would hope to hear, "It's a process and I trust in the process.  This year will not dictate what I will be in the future, but it will dictate how I grow as a player and how I learn to overcome adversity."

Jackson gets it!  He's been listening...very good sign for the future!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 20, 2012, 09:22:30 am
I don't list runs scored for anyone because, while interesting, it's a stat almost as much in the hands of teammates as the player himself.

.... which is also true for RBI, which you do list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: EightyTwo on July 20, 2012, 09:28:07 am
You can please some of the people...

Just click on the box score if you are that interested.  Sheesh.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 20, 2012, 09:28:19 am
Jackson gets it!  He's been listening...very good sign for the future!

A much better sign would be a serious drop in his K rate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 20, 2012, 10:06:36 am
One step at a time...major improvement seldom happens overnight...Jackson may never make it at the MLB level, but the right mindset and a professional approach makes a HUGE difference and will help him maximize his chances.   I'm happy with that for now...no big hurry re Jackson or the others.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 20, 2012, 10:11:30 am
One step at a time...major improvement seldom happens overnight...Jackson may never make it at the MLB level, but the right mindset and a professional approach makes a HUGE difference and will help him maximize his chances.   I'm happy with that for now...no big hurry re Jackson or the others.

I'm as big a fan of Jackson as anyone here.  But he turns 24 in August and if he's not proven himself to the guys that matter by early next season, I'm guessing his future as a major building block with the Cubs will become very uncertain, given the other guys in the pipeline now. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 20, 2012, 12:16:45 pm
ArizonaPhil

There is (surprise) a mistake in tonight's "official" milb box score (see link above).

Cubs 2012 1st round Supplemental draft pick RHP Paul Blackburn (selected by the Cubs with 2012 Rule 4 Draft slot #56, the slot awarded to the Cubs when Article XX-B Type "B" FA Carlos Pena signed with TB last off-season) did indeed start the game for the AZL Cubs, but he pitched only one inning (20 pitches - 11 strikes), allowing one run on two hits (both doubles) and a walk. (The second double was a two-out RBI double that was actually a routine pop up that RF Yasiel Balaguert apparently lost in the twilight sky).

Then Cubs 2012 12th round pick RHP Justin Amlung (who is not presently listed in the box score) worked the 2nd & 3rd innings (22 pitches - 14 strikes), allowing a single and no runs, with one strikeout.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 20, 2012, 01:07:18 pm
I'm as big a fan of Jackson as anyone here.  But he turns 24 in August and if he's not proven himself to the guys that matter by early next season, I'm guessing his future as a major building block with the Cubs will become very uncertain, given the other guys in the pipeline now. 

I don't think other guys in the pipeline are really providing any time pressure on Jackson.  He's still got a pretty wide-open good-sized window of opportunity to show whether he's a starting-caliber big-leaguer or not. 

Almora is years away.  And Szczur is still only in A-ball with limited experience and somewhat limited toolbox.  I don't imagine he's going to be a big-league factor before 2014 at the soonest, and even then with no power he's not going to be an overwhelming get-out-of-the-way-here-I-come prospect. 

Jackson will have plenty of window to show whether or not he's good.  If by July or September of 2014 Szczur is looking ready, but Jackson has established himself as a quality major leaguer, Jackson will not be at risk.  If Jackson has 1-2 years at least to either win it or lose it, that's a pretty big window of opportunity. 

I'm very interested and hopeful for Szczur.  But without power, he's not going to be knocking Jackson out of the lineup if Jackson is producing.  It will be hard enough for Szczur to make it, given his 48K/1HR on non-BIP this season.  But if Szczur someday replaces Jackson, that will probably require both that Szczur develops very nicely and that Jackson has failed to convert on opportunity.  But that won't be for lack of time or opportunity, I don't think. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 20, 2012, 01:16:14 pm
One step at a time...major improvement seldom happens overnight...Jackson may never make it at the MLB level, but the right mindset and a professional approach makes a HUGE difference and will help him maximize his chances.   I'm happy with that for now...no big hurry re Jackson or the others.

To follow on Ron's response, I would agree entirely if we were talking about a 20-year-old in high A ball.  But we aren't.

Jackson is at an age and a level when he needs to start improving his K rate, and not just having a good mindset.

Sh*t, ben, I could say the same things about myself that Jackson said, and it wouldn't mean much for my chances of ever helping the Cubs. "It's a process and I trust in the process.  This year will not dictate what I will be in the future, but it will dictate how I grow as a player and how I learn to overcome adversity."

He needs to bring down the K rate, not just have a good mindset.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 01:34:49 pm
Quote
No. 3    JAVIER BAEZ, SS CUBS

Team: Low Class A Peoria (Midwest)

Age: 19

Why He's Here: .500/.519/1.042 (12-for-24), 2 HR, 2 3B, 3 2B, 7 RBIs, 4 R, 0 BB, 3 SO, 3-for-5 SB

The Scoop: The Cubs held Baez back in extended spring training until Memorial Day weekend, in part because they didn't want to subject the ninth overall pick in last year's draft to the harsh early-season weather of the Midwest League. The approach has paid off so far. After crushing seven extra-base hits in six games this week, Baez is batting .338/.397/.605 with nine homers through 157 at-bats with Peoria, and his  1.002 OPS ranks second in the MWL since he joined the league on May 28.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613746.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 20, 2012, 01:40:53 pm
One step at a time...major improvement seldom happens overnight...

True enough.  Now, when did we see the first step forward in his K rate?

I believe Jackson's K rate has always been the major concern about him.

His speed, glove, arm, baserunning, ability to draw walks, and to hit for xtra bases (when you hit the ball hard and are fast enough, xtra base hits are almost a given) have never really been questions.

His K rate has been.  And it has gotten worse instead of better.

When will that first step forward come?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 20, 2012, 01:46:27 pm
Perhaps soon.  Perhaps never.  The Cubs have nothing to lose in going slowly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 20, 2012, 01:53:44 pm
When I consider Jackson's status, I don't just look at the current pipeline, but guys that Hoyerstein could trade for who either now or in the future could play OF and CF.   And that doesn't even count free agency down the road.  Jackson needs to step up soon, or upper management will look at other options.  Even now, I'm sure pitching is the position sought the most, but if a potential star CF was offered for Dempster or Garza...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 20, 2012, 02:10:22 pm
Quote
I'm very interested and hopeful for Szczur.  But without power, he's not going to be knocking Jackson out of the lineup if Jackson is producing.  It will be hard enough for Szczur to make it, given his 48K/1HR on non-BIP this season.

There's still time for power to develop. 

1.  Daytona and the FSL in general are very tough places to hit for power.

2.  Power is often the last thing to develop for a hitter and might especially be the case for someone like Szczur who has concentrated so much on football.

Put it another way, hitting for even 10-15 HR power is about the only thing lacking from him having a pretty complete package as a player, and there's reason for optimism that he may hit for that kind of power in the future.  Other than that, he has speed, he's hitting for average, he has very good strike zone judgment, and he plays good defense.  I think his development is coming along very nicely this season, and if/when he starts hitting for any kind of power at all, you have a very exciting prospect on your hands.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 20, 2012, 02:17:11 pm
Szczur is most likely to wind up as a leadoff hitter anyway, so his OPB and SBs will be more important than his HRs. And he does have reasonable numbers for doubles and triples.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 20, 2012, 02:21:34 pm
I think that the Cubs would be happy if Matt Szczur ended up as a Reed Johnson type player with more stolen bases.

I don't know if everybody here would be happy about that, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 20, 2012, 02:25:15 pm
Factored at 550 ABs at his current pace, Szuzur would have 38 doubles and 8 triples---he has extra base power. 

HR power is missing so far but sometimes those extra base hits turn into some homers with more seasoning and, as JR notes, FSL is not a HR league. If Cubs fast-A affiliate was in Cal League, Szuzur would be looking better on the HR issue.  Will be interesting to see what happens with this guy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 20, 2012, 02:37:39 pm
I think that the Cubs would be happy if Matt Szczur ended up as a Reed Johnson type player with more stolen bases.

I don't know if everybody here would be happy about that, though.

Yes the 2006 version of Reed Johnson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 20, 2012, 02:56:16 pm
Well sooner or later, the Cubs need to start developing some impact, difference making players.  Yeah if Szczur doesn't improve his power much and turns into a .350-.360 type OBP player or a Reed Johnson type, that's a pretty decent leadoff hitter, but that's not a big difference maker on a championship caliber team. 

What we really need is for guys like Szczur to develop into a Johnny Damon or even a 2003 Cubs version of Kenny Lofton.  Those are the types of players that make differences on pennant winners, and we have to start developing guys like that.

It's one thing to hope an average prospect like Darwin Barney turns into the nice role player he's turned into.  But when you have a guy you made a $1.5 million investment in and he's already showing 4 plus tools and could have the potential to add an average or slightly better power tool, you'd like to see that guy turn into an All-Star caliber player. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 20, 2012, 03:01:59 pm
I think that the Cubs think Ceasar will be better than that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 20, 2012, 03:16:47 pm
This would be a somewhat realistic "best case scenario" for Szczur:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/stewash01.shtml
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 20, 2012, 03:19:08 pm
Certainly an optimistic scenerio, but not unreasonable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 20, 2012, 03:28:42 pm
That's a pretty good "best case" for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 20, 2012, 03:41:15 pm
I think that the Cubs would be happy if Matt Szczur ended up as a Reed Johnson type player with more stolen bases.

I don't know if everybody here would be happy about that, though.

If we could guarantee that performance, I would be happy to sacrifice having anything better.... so long as he were never worse.

Johnson, by the way, showed a good bit of promise stealing in the minors -- 42 steals in one season in AA ball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 04:52:23 pm
More in-depth article on Soler and Almora's relationship:

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120720&content_id=35233394&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc&tcid=tw_article_35233394
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 09:21:41 pm
Robert Whitenack fails to get any of the seven hitters he faced out.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_20_dbcafa_jupafa_1


Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_20_tenaax_cngaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 10:15:54 pm
Baez: 1-6, SB, 2 K

Geiger: 2-5, HR, RBI, K

Jensen: 6-3-2-1-2-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_20_peoafx_wmiafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 10:23:10 pm
Torrez: 5-4-2-0-1-2   (0.91 ERA)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_20_dchrok_dwarok_1


DSL1 suspended.


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 11:30:14 pm
Jackson: 2-4, HR, SF, 2 RBI, CS, K, E

Vitters: 2-4, 2B, RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_20_iowaaa_albaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 11:54:50 pm
Candelario: 1-2, 2 BB, E

Shoulders: 4-4, 2B, HR, 2 RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_20_boiasx_eugasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 11:55:21 pm
Keith Law on Soler:


Quote
Cuban outfielder Jorge Soler made his pro debut on Thursday night with the Chicago Cubs' club in the rookie-level Arizona League, the lowest level of organized baseball, with teams largely populated by teenaged prospects, rehabbers, and a handful of older organizational players. Already 20, he's old to be in this league, but given how long it's been since he faced live pitching, it's a reasonable place for him to start.

Soler, who signed a nine-year, $30 million dollar deal with the Cubs in June, only DH'd and had three at-bats before he was pulled for a pinch hitter -- you know, don't want to overtax the guy or anything -- and did at least get a chance to show how explosive his hands are at the plate. He loads his hands high and deep, but accelerates quickly enough to catch up to above-average stuff, even meeting a few balls out in front of the plate (perhaps because his timing is still off). He's balanced through the swing and should be able to generate power from his lower half. He grounded out twice but didn't run hard either time, although his strides are long and easy and he should be an above-average runner when he decides to show it. (His third at-bat was a hard lineout to the pitcher.) He's in very good shape and his body looks loose and athletic. This wasn't an ideal look since he didn't play the field and hasn't faced live pitching in ages, but at least some of the tools were on display -- and yes, I will go back in a week or so to try to see him in the field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 20, 2012, 11:55:52 pm
Law also said Paul Blackburn was throwing 86-88.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 21, 2012, 08:33:32 am
Law also said Paul Blackburn was throwing 86-88.

Eewww, not so encouraging. 

Might explain why he's been overmatched in his first couple of games. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 21, 2012, 08:43:06 am
We'll see if this continues, but Jackkkson has only 5 K's in his last 42 PA's per cubs den.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 21, 2012, 08:46:08 am
Shoulders turning it around very nicely. He's .277/.395/.495 on the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 21, 2012, 09:49:48 am
We'll see if this continues, but Jackkkson has only 5 K's in his last 42 PA's per cubs den.

WAY more impressive than a good attitude.

It looks like cubs den is right.  In his last 10 games, 40 AB .300/.375/.475/.850 with 4 Ks.  http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=CF&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=571804

If he does that for a while, it could become a lot more comfortable thinking he could be serious contributor.  With his speed, glove and xtra-base power, if he just gets his K's down to 25%, and maintained the OBP, he would be a real asset.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 21, 2012, 10:26:39 am
We'll see if this continues, but Jackkkson has only 5 K's in his last 42 PA's per cubs den.

Hope it does continue.  If Jackson can get that one area of weakness under reasonable control, he's going to be a lot of fun to watch.  He and Rizzo reportedly became buds in Iowa, but he's a very different player than Rizzo. Rizzo is a laid back, calm guy whose confidence is deep but quiet, while Jackson is a very gregarious, aggressive ballplayer with a very active sense of humor whose confidence is more in the direction of cockiness. Both have been characterized as natural leaders (something Cub teams have tended to lack).  They should complement each other very nicely (knock on wood).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 21, 2012, 10:31:07 am
Cubs Den is smoking something - he has 13 Ks in his last 40 ABs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 21, 2012, 10:42:51 am
Unfortunately, even that is an improvement.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 21, 2012, 11:34:17 am
Cubs Den is smoking something - he has 13 Ks in his last 40 ABs.

Cubs den may have been doing the same thing I was.... looking at the SB column.

Yeah, 13 K in 40 AB is nothing to get excited about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2012, 06:17:56 pm
Javy Baez launched a homer in the 1st tonight to extend his hit-streak to 16.


Quote
Peoria Chiefs ‏@peoriachiefs

Batters Eyes at 405 feet away in Center are just objects for @Javy23Baez to hit the ball over.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 21, 2012, 06:47:36 pm
(http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/2267582037/lm0v782ihasl6gqfl67y_normal.jpeg)Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein
And his move to third is not imminent.


(http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/2267582037/lm0v782ihasl6gqfl67y_normal.jpeg)No. RT Kevin Goldstein ‏@Kevin_Goldstein
[/size] Given offensive numbers, and his move to third becoming imminent, do you see Baez moving up soon?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 21, 2012, 07:43:20 pm
So far Rademacher is 2 for 2 with a single and double.  I wonder if he is for real?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 21, 2012, 07:46:40 pm
Are you back on the pipe?  We're not that lucky.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 21, 2012, 07:51:31 pm
Rademacher was a 13th round choice.  The similarity to Albert Pujols is overwhelming.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 21, 2012, 07:55:21 pm
Maybe Chadd Krist can be Mike Piazza, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 21, 2012, 07:56:26 pm
Now you are just being silly.  Krist was picked WAY before Piazza.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 21, 2012, 07:57:05 pm
By the way, Tenn. is showing LA why we didn't really want Zach Lee anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2012, 08:07:31 pm
Szczur: 3-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_21_dbcafa_jupafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2012, 09:28:38 pm
Baez: 3-4, 3B, HR, 2 RBI, SB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_21_peoafx_souafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 21, 2012, 09:34:09 pm
MLB's worst farm system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 21, 2012, 09:34:12 pm
Funny stat:  Amaya has 7 triples to 2 doubles. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 21, 2012, 09:35:17 pm
Funny stat:  Amaya is a non-prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 21, 2012, 10:01:11 pm
The voice of ignorance speaks again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2012, 10:10:24 pm
Soler's field debut will have to wait as Mesa's game was postponed.

Tennessee's game was suspended in the 8th.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 21, 2012, 11:54:13 pm
Vitters: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI

Cabrera: 2-6-5-2-1-5, 3 HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_21_iowaaa_albaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 01:45:33 am
Amaya: 2-4, 3B, RBI, BB, K

Candelario: 0-3, 2 BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_21_boiasx_eugasx_1


Alcala: 1-4, 2B, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_21_dcurok_drdrok_1


DSL 2:


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_21_dwarok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 01:48:05 am
Video of Baez' homer which looks like it must've gone 425+


http://www.wsbt.com/videogallery/71226930/Sports/Cubs%27-Baez-hits-bomb--but-Hawks-win-6-5#pl-62892312
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 01:54:54 am
Baez' second AB:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjzUfM56y_8
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 08:02:06 am
I love me some Gioskar.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 22, 2012, 09:19:12 am
Baez take a good rip, and that big leg kick probably helps with the power and weight transfer.  Certainly seems to have the tools to hit the fastest velocity that Midwest Leaguers show.  The big leg kick probably explains why he strikes out so much, I'd imagine a lot of pitchers who can repeat their deliveries between fastball and offspeed might get him pretty off-balance.  Probably see him swinging at a lot of breaking balls bouncing in front of the plate eventually. 

A nsbb poster was at the game, and his report seems to fit a recurring observation.  Baez seems to be a really alert, high-energy, thinking player who's always looking to make plays.  Said that he was running full speed and full-out hustle on the ball that ended up a triple, and that wasn't really too far from being a HR in right center.  Hustle.  Said he made a really good over-the-shoulder catch on a Texas Leaguer.  That he got a great jump and was running full out and wasn't shying away in case the LF or CF might run into him  Quick start, good hustle, non-hesitant.  And said he had a steal, but it was a delayed steal.  Delayed steals, I think, always involve a guy who's alert and thinking, who's looking for an edge and has been watching the pitcher/catcher for a chance to take advantage.  This kind of thing seems to have been recurring.  Hustle, running hard from the start at least on any extra-base hit, base-stealing perhaps more by smarts and "read" than pure speed, and the going extra to back up or whatever.  I htink there was a report earlier where he was backing up  behind 3B, and when Geiger errored Baez was positioned to make a big play.  DaveP observed that he got HBP on a slow inside curveball, and that he didn't seem to avoid it, like he maybe "let" himself get hit because he could.  Report of throwing a guy out at home in which he'd moved way out into the outfield, requiring more from his strong arm and less from the weaker outfield arm. 

We've had good prospects and great players who didn't always seem like they loved baseball or were real high-energy or smart/alert/find-an-edge guys.  Vitters.  Corey has loved baseball to keep playing and playing for 15 years, well after his chance at greatness had passed.  But as a kid, he didn't come across as a guy who just loved to play, and was looking for any chance he could find to steal a base or do something extra.  I think JR used to think that he looked different and somehow seemed to turn it up when management was visiting then on an ordinary Thursday game back in AA/AAA.  Aram of course. 

But Baez seems to really have that intensity to make plays and get a little advantage however he can.  Sounds fun. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 22, 2012, 09:45:03 am
Really glad Lindor wasn't there....love this pick.

not sure he'll really be able to steal that much at the major league level, but I'll take the hustling Sheffield comp's.

Hopefully 2/3 of him, Soler and Almora come close to their potential.  That'll make one exciting team.

I think, like Rizzo, they'll have to do some tinkering with Soler and Baez's swings as they get closer tho....not sure if it's easier to do when you have a lot of experience to fall back on, or when you don't, but i'd like to see swings/leg kicks shortened/toned down earlier if the experience wasn't needed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on July 22, 2012, 10:24:27 am
Great stuff re Baez, guys...sure looks like a great pick by the prior regime at this point...that intensity suggests a terrific work ethic, which is key to realizing potential.

We are stockpiling guys with talent...some really fun years coming our way...down the road, of course, but we've waited this long.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 22, 2012, 10:38:48 am
I haven't been this excited about a Cubs position prospect since...  Well - a long time.  He's monstrously talented, seemed like a really sharp kid and extremely intense - and he looks like a true SS to me.  He could be a very fast mover.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 10:51:02 am
It will be interesting to see how much his swing ends up changing. No doubt that leg kick is big, and he over swings, but you don't want to mess too much with this kind of success.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 10:53:21 am
The other thing about him is that his bat is the first I can remember that looks monstrous no matter where he ends up playing.

In his heyday, Patterson looked like he was going to have a great glove and good power... for a CF. Baez is looking like the kind of hitter that bats third... in the all-star game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 22, 2012, 11:06:01 am
Im glad Deeg said it before I was gonna have to but Baez does seem like a fast mover.

Fast enough that he should get promoted now IMO.

Ill start being a Smokie regular again when he gets to AA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 22, 2012, 11:38:01 am
The biggest surprise about Baez is his defense.  Scouts no longer think he will have to move off shortstop.  If the Cubs move him to third, it will be because they want Castro to stay at short.

And by the way, Castro has also made incredible strides on his defense.  I wonder if that is why his offense has slowed a little.  He seems to be extremely coachable, but until his actions become "instinctual", he has a difficult time concentrating on more than one thing at a time.

I wish I could get more excited about Almora.  When I read the scouting reports, I keep thinking Reed Johnson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 22, 2012, 11:39:32 am
Ill start being a Smokie regular again when he gets to AA.

You mean stars like Apodaca and Watkins don't keep you in the seats?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 22, 2012, 01:06:56 pm
Ill start being a Smokie regular again when he gets to AA.

I'm sure we all look forward to your reports, Jiggy.

Except for the comments about the size of his junk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 22, 2012, 01:08:51 pm
I hear Jiggy has been banned from the shower room.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 22, 2012, 01:13:04 pm
Except for the comments about the size of his junk.

You misquote Corey.  He commented on the size of his Johnson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 22, 2012, 01:38:27 pm
The other thing about him is that his bat is the first I can remember that looks monstrous no matter where he ends up playing.

In his heyday, Patterson looked like he was going to have a great glove and good power... for a CF. Baez is looking like the kind of hitter that bats third... in the all-star game.

I think Corey's in A-ball seemed supposedly excellent anywhere.  Choi and Dopirak seemed like they could be real hitters.  And Vitters when he went on his binge in Peoria seemed like a super hitting prospect.  I have to admit that while I love a ton about Baez's game, the high K-rate and no walks whatsoever make me wonder.  How will it translate against better pitching.  As  prospect watcher, I always hope guys will get better.  But if there's a guy who K'd less in majors than in Peoria, I'm not sure I can remember him.  So I've got a nagging concern that whiffing so much and walking so little might reflect a guy who loves to rip fastballs.  But when the breaking stuff gets better and better, and the scouting, I wonder how that will work. 

The leg kick seems pretty serious.  Josh Hamilton has a leg kick, not as big.  And Hamilton K's a fair bit, although of course not at Baez's rate.  But if you leg-kick some and K, but hit HR's like Hamilton does or like Baez has at Peoria, that's A-OK. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 01:57:36 pm
Quote
Peoria Chiefs ‏@peoriachiefs

Was told that the South Bend groundskeeper has been here since stadium opened in 1988 & has seen 5 HR hit over batters eye (Baez last night)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 02:00:17 pm
Fwiw, Baez's k rate in Peoria is 20%. Not particularly high. Walk rate is definitely low.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 22, 2012, 02:19:01 pm
I wonder if Baez will see Daytona before the end of the season.  That could be a really tough promotion and cool him off considerably, as tough as that league can be on hitters, though.  They might just be happy to see him continue to dominate Peoria the rest of the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 22, 2012, 03:43:24 pm
Fwiw, Baez's k rate in Peoria is 20%. Not particularly high. Walk rate is definitely low.

37K/167AB = 22.1%.  I know it's more sophisticated to include PA, but milb/stats doesn't include them, or HBP, or sacrifices, or whatever other non-AB PA's there might be. 

But per AB, 20% is a simple number, very few good big-leaguers were over 20% in low A.  And very few big leaguers K'd more in A- than they end up doing in AA, AAA, or majors. 

Baez may be an exception. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 22, 2012, 03:58:55 pm
But per AB, 20% is a simple number, very few good big-leaguers were over 20% in low A. 

Not sure if that's true.

Matt Holliday had 116 K's in 444 AB.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=hollid001mat

Joey Votto had 177 K's in 593 AB.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=votto-001jos

Matt Kemp had 100 K's in 423 AB.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=kemp--001mat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 04:26:25 pm
Baez: 0-4, K, E,   (hit-streak ends at 16)

Geiger: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_22_peoafx_souafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 22, 2012, 04:30:48 pm
Quote
hit-streak ends at 16

Probably was reading here and saw Craig dissing him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 22, 2012, 04:38:12 pm
Baez heading down Nitro Nick path...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 05:25:10 pm
The wild conclusion to Tennessee's suspended game:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_21_tenaax_cngaax_1



Rosscup: 3-1-0-0-1-5   ( 26 K's in 14-1/3 IP over three levels since return )

McNutt: 1-2-3-3-2-0


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_22_tenaax_cngaax_1



Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 05:46:12 pm
Amaya: 1-4, 2 K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_22_boiasx_eugasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 06:21:13 pm
37K/167AB = 22.1%.  I know it's more sophisticated to include PA, but milb/stats doesn't include them, or HBP, or sacrifices, or whatever other non-AB PA's there might be. 

But per AB, 20% is a simple number, very few good big-leaguers were over 20% in low A.  And very few big leaguers K'd more in A- than they end up doing in AA, AAA, or majors. 

Baez may be an exception. 

Craig, check fangraphs for K/PA. I would have contested te idea that few good major league hitters K'd at 20% rates in A ball, but JR beat me to it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 22, 2012, 06:28:38 pm
If Baez sees Daytona this season, don't be surprised if he sees Chicago before the end of next.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 22, 2012, 06:53:23 pm
No doubt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 22, 2012, 08:44:37 pm
Craig, check fangraphs for K/PA. I would have contested te idea that few good major league hitters K'd at 20% rates in A ball, but JR beat me to it.

Chris doesn't post Fangraph, he posts milb. 

But, if it makes a difference and it's important to use PA instead of AB, I think it's unusual for Midwest Leaguer with a K-rate over 18.0185 to end up batting 3rd in big-league All-Star games.  And it's unusual for big-league all-stars to have had K-rates over 18.0185 in low-A. 

But perhaps not as unusual as I think.  Votto/Kemp/Holliday are three.  Albert Belle. 

Unusual is not the same as never, so I'm certainly hoping that Baez is one of the unusual ones who makes it work.  It's a caution flag, that's all I'm saying.  He's an exciting talent, but he's not can't-miss.  If he does end up missing, it will probably be because of whatever it is that is currently causing him to K so much and walk so little. 

I'm wondering whether his current results are the doings of an accomplished fastball hitter who guesses fastball and leg-kick's for fastball and who gets enough fastballs to hit .350 with lots of HR's.  He may be fine versus breaking stuff, already, or may become an excellent breaking-ball masher future.  (A ton of big-league HR's are on imperfect breaking balls, probably more than on fastballs...)  But I think his ability to handle more advanced breaking stuff is still an open question.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 22, 2012, 08:52:54 pm
Craig, it is also unusual for anyone in low A ball to become a star in the majors.  Most washout, of, if they reach the majors, are not stars.

It is also unusual for anyone in low A ball to put up the kind of numbers Baez is.

If the universe of players in low A to put up the kind of numbers Baez is includes only one 1% with K rates as high as his who become stars in the majors, but the in the universe of players in low A to perform that well with a K rate significantly less 30% of them become stars in the majors, then it is a real concern.

But right now, for all we know, guys who put up offensive numbers like Baez but strike out less there actually wash out more often.  Counter-intuitive, but without looking at some track records, we really don't know.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 22, 2012, 09:04:08 pm
Quote
It's a caution flag, that's all I'm saying.

You're just trying to get him into the Northern League, aren't you?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 22, 2012, 09:34:55 pm
Rosscup: 3-1-0-0-1-5   ( 26 K's in 14-1/3 IP over three levels since return )
...

Did he have TJ surgery, or what?  I'm very, very interested.  There were a lot of prospects involved in the Garza trade, but he might become a very significant factor. 

He's got very few pro innings, but he's been very good in the innings he's thrown, he's been high-K, he's been strongly anti-HR.  Who knows what relevance  his pre-injury (pre-TJ?) performance has to what he is now.  But his K-rate surgery offers the hope that he's got something going.  And, I saw some passing reference to 95 mph.  Who knows?  I'll keep hoping for the best until there's reason not to. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 22, 2012, 10:03:46 pm
Soler gets his first hit in his second AB.  A 2-run homer, driving in Vogelbach. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 22, 2012, 10:09:44 pm
Craig, i'm upset that you beat me to the post about Soler's home run. but grateful that you didn't make a "Soler power" pun.
Uh oh, have I just sent out the bat signal for P2?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 22, 2012, 10:10:16 pm
Soler gets his first hit in his second AB.  A 2-run homer, driving in Vogelbach. 

Call him up!
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 22, 2012, 10:12:15 pm
Per Twitter, it was a first pitch bomb to LCF...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 10:15:12 pm
Quote
Did he have TJ surgery, or what?

We've had this talk before and I don't think we ever pin down exactly what Rosscup's past injury issues were.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 10:17:12 pm
Bill Mitchell estimates Soler's HR at 420 feet. Also says Soler made a nice, over-the-shoulder catch the following inning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 10:20:11 pm
Vitters: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI, 2 K, E

Jackson: 1-4, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_22_iowaaa_albaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 10:23:34 pm
Fun with numbers time!

I took a sample from the 2012 All-Star rosters. Sample included starting lineups except for Melky Cabrera (side note: how the hell did MelkMan end up a starter?!). I excluded Melky cause he sucks. Sample also included significant SS's, and 3Bmen on the bench (ex. Andrus, M. Cabrera, Chipper, Wright, etc.). Sample also included all significant hitters on the bench (Holliday, Kemp, Kinsler, etc.). Sample also included minor league phenoms (ex. Trout, Stanton, Harper, Wieters, etc.). Basically, my somewhat arbitrary selection process included the most remarkable of all stars, in an effort to bias the sample against Baez, trying to put him in the most unfavorable light possible. I'm stacking the deck against him.

End sample is as follows: Napoli, Prince, Cano, Beltre, Jeter, Hamilton, Granderson, Bautista, Ortiz, Andrus, M. Cabrera, Wieters, Kinsler, Trout, Posey, Votto, Uggla, Sandoval, Furcal, Beltran, Braun, Castro, Chipper, Wright, Bruce, CarGo, Harper, Holliday, Kemp, McCutch, Stanton.

For these players, I took their first go-round at full season A ball, as long as the stay was at least 100 AB's. Short, end of season promotions to full season A ball were not considered. Instead, the following year's numbers at full season A ball were used. For the few players that just skipped full season A, I used advanced A ball numbers.

I recorded each player's full season A ball AB's, BB's, K's, and OPS totals. AB's, BB's, and K's were used to calculate K-rate and BB-rate against PA's. Yes, there are a few PA's that are ommitted via this methodology (sacrifices, HBP's), but it's close enough for a message board post.

The posts that follow will list the players in order of BB-rate, K-rate, and OPS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 10:24:40 pm
BB RATES:

wieters   16.12%
votto   14.85%
harper   14.57%
posey   13.39%
wright   13.29%
bautista   13.27%
trout   12.85%
chipper   12.73%
beltre   12.54%
prince   12.39%
uggla   11.86%
stanton   11.03%
furcal   10.90%
holliday   10.66%
jeter   10.12%
kinsler   10.04%
beltran   9.89%
ortiz   9.68%
granderson   9.33%
bruce   9.02%
cargo   8.53%
mccutch   8.48%
napoli   8.12%
cabrera   8.06%
andrus   7.61%
hamilton   6.46%
cano   5.77%
braun   5.59%
kemp   5.37%
castro   5.04%
sandoval   4.78%
baez   3.93%
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 10:26:08 pm
K RATES

furcal   9.57%
castro   10.88%
chipper   12.92%
posey   13.39%
prince   13.96%
kinsler   14.46%
trout   14.53%
cargo   15.28%
cano   15.51%
sandoval   16.09%
beltre   16.49%
cabrera   16.56%
jeter   16.58%
hamilton   16.99%
wieters   17.22%
granderson   17.33%
uggla   17.53%
mccutch   18.38%
andrus   19.24%
wright   19.93%
ortiz   20.11%
harper   20.20%
bautista   20.59%
beltran   20.65%
braun   21.12%
baez   21.35%
bruce   21.72%
kemp   22.37%
holliday   23.34%
napoli   26.40%
votto   27.95%
stanton   29.09%
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 10:26:48 pm
OPS

kinsler   1.157
braun   1.041
wieters   1.024
baez   0.996
stanton   0.993
beltre   0.992
trout   0.979
harper   0.977
posey   0.967
prince   0.935
chipper   0.925
ortiz   0.901
bautista   0.872
bruce   0.871
cargo   0.86
kemp   0.829
hamilton   0.823
granderson   0.823
furcal   0.814
mccutch   0.802
holliday   0.785
jeter   0.77
wright   0.768
cano   0.767
napoli   0.754
castro   0.731
cabrera   0.709
andrus   0.685
beltran   0.673
votto   0.635
sandoval   0.631
uggla   0.566
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 22, 2012, 10:49:25 pm
So Craig's concerns would seem to make sense, even if perhaps not quite as big a red flag as he seemed to think.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 10:56:02 pm
What do we see? Baez's BB rate, at 3.93%, is VERY low. Average BB rate for this sample is 9.88%. In a rather crude statistical application, the standard deviation of the sample is 3.25%, meaning that Baez's rate is basically 2 standard deviations removed, which is pretty remarkable. Puts him in the bottom 0.03% of BB-rates. This is NO BUENO.

Baez's K rate, at 21.35%, is somewhat high. Average K rate for this sample is 18.37%. In a rather crude statistical application, the standard deviation of the sample is 4.52%, meaning Baez is well within the boundaries of the first standard deviation. Craig, I don't think the data backs up your idea that it's rare for an all-star to K at Baez's rate in A-ball.

Baez's OPS, at 0.996 is very high. Average OPS for this sample is 0.845. In a rather crude statistical application, the standard deviation of the sample is 0.138, meaning Baez is beyond the boundaries of the first standard deviation, and by a somewhat significant margin.

In summary, Baez's BB rates are almost off the charts bad, Baez's K rates are a little above average, and Baez's OPS is significantly above average when compared against a sample of 2012's "best" all-stars in their corresponding minor league seasons.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 10:56:58 pm
So Craig's concerns would seem to make sense, even if perhaps not quite as big a red flag as he seemed to think.

The concern about BB's, which I never disputed, yes.

The concern about K's, no, I do not think that makes sense, from a purely statistical viewpoint.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 11:01:02 pm
Great news on Soler and Vitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 22, 2012, 11:01:40 pm
Pure dangerous hitters will take a healthy number of walks eventually.

It's not like Baez is a wild and crazy hacker up there, as I think his decent enough K rate is showing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 22, 2012, 11:14:26 pm
K RATES

mccutch   18.38%
andrus   19.24%
wright   19.93%
ortiz   20.11%
harper   20.20%
bautista   20.59%
beltran   20.65%
braun   21.12%
baez   21.35%
bruce   21.72%
kemp   22.37%
holliday   23.34%
napoli   26.40%
votto   27.95%
stanton   29.09%


Thanks a bunch, tico.  I was clearly wrong, and your info has enlightened and persuaded me. 

That's a much larger bunch than I'd expected who had K-rates above 18%, which is about equivalent to my 20%-per-AB rate.  And six with higher K-rates than Baez is also more than I expected.  So it would seem less alarming than I was perceiving, and that it would be not that unusual for him to end up really successful. 

Also, the nsbb guy who reported on yesterday's Baez game went again today and reported his observations in detail, for Baez and others.  (He said Peralta's 4-seamer was 90-95.  Mostly 93-94 early hitting 95, 90-92 later but still hit 94.    But here's his Baez notes:

Quote
Baez:
Looked foolish on some breaking pitches. Definitely looks for first pitch fastballs. I forgot to mention in yesterday's game, he swwung so hard he almost fell down, then raked his foot across the box as though the loose soil in the box was the reason. He swung like that a few times today without the theatrics. In the field his range and fielding seemed perfectly fine. Him getting to the DeVoss play above was impressive since DeVoss barely got there and it was the first base side of second. His throwing though was poor. In the first he had a throwing error on a ball he practically 'flipped' across to Hoilman, pulling him off the bag toward home plate. He did this again in the fifth, throwing the ball in the dirt, but Hoilman dug it out. I had read before that he likes to show off his cannon arm, but I saw nothing like that today. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 11:16:04 pm
Pure dangerous hitters will take a healthy number of walks eventually.

It's not like Baez is a wild and crazy hacker up there, as I think his decent enough K rate is showing. 

I generally agree, JR.

By the way, check out Braun's profile compared to Baez's profile.

Braun's BB rate: 5.59% - one of the lowest
Baez's BB rate: 3.93% - the lowest

Braun's K rate: 21.12% - a little above average
Baez's K rate: 21.35% - a little above average

Braun's OPS: 1.041 - significantly above average
Baez's OPS: 0.996 - significantly above average

VERY similar profiles. Baez is just doing it 2 years younger than Braun. While playing a premium defensive position.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 22, 2012, 11:20:14 pm
So, tico, you're saying we should be encouraged?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 22, 2012, 11:23:02 pm
Soler got a single in his next AB, but apparently hit it so hard that it hit the 3B in the head and he was removed from the game.  Yikes, scary.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 22, 2012, 11:24:31 pm
Craig, those in-game observations on Baez square well with your thoughts on how Baez's current swing may translate in the future, and while I don't think his present K-rate is concerning, I agree that there are larger mechanical questions that loom.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 11:57:30 pm
Baez has 1 walk in 108 at-bats since the all-star break.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 22, 2012, 11:57:38 pm
Soler: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, K

Vogelbach: 1-4, RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_22_cinrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 23, 2012, 12:04:46 am
So, tico, you're saying we should be encouraged?

Very. Craig's mechanical concerns are the biggest hurdle for Baez at this point, but the raw pieces for Baez are off-the-charts good. If the Cubs can tame the leg kick a little and show him he doesn't have to try and force nuclear fusion with each and every swing, look out.

Take a look at the top of that OPS list again. Two more things to point out.  First, given that Baez's BB-rates are significantly lower than everyone near the top but Braun, it means that in order to put up a category leading OPS, Baez's power numbers are off the charts. I'm not going to do the same sorts of calculations for IsoP, but my guess is that his IsoP is as good as his BB-rate is bad.

Second, many of the guys near the top were significantly older than Baez at the time of that production. Kinsler - college. Braun - college. Wieters - college. Posey - college. Who else is at the top of the list? Beltre, will be borderline HOF at worst when he finishes his career, and would be sure fire HOF were it not for injuries and their effect on his production. That leaves Stanton, Harper, and Trout. While their careers are still brand new, these are truly remarkable baseball talents. Stanton is the most hyped power prospect that I have seen in a while, and Harper and Trout are all-around baseball talents on the level of Griffey, Jr.; and ARod. Age-vs-level production is one of the most important statistical indicators of future success. Baseball at large doesn't think about Baez as a Stanton/Trout/Harper talent, but perhaps it should.

 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 23, 2012, 12:24:37 am
Baez has 1 walk in 108 at-bats since the all-star break.

He also has an OPS above 1.000 since the all-star break.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 12:43:04 am
Okay. If he can continue to do that with that walk rate it'll be the most extraordinary feat in baseball history.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 12:44:56 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T28jvA92Wvo&feature=plcp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 23, 2012, 01:11:26 am
Very little body movement in that swing - quite stable and under control.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 01:41:47 am
His setup and particularly his swing and follow-through remind me of Andruw Jones.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 23, 2012, 02:20:30 am
Good call
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 23, 2012, 06:27:12 am
Pure dangerous hitters will take a healthy number of walks eventually.

Hard as it is to imagine, even Vlad drew 50 or more walks for 7 straight years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 23, 2012, 07:04:24 am
Very little body movement in that swing - quite stable and under control.

Yes.  That looked pretty ideal. 

Vogelbach is the guy on the bases ahead of Soler.  He looks really short by comparison to Soler, but isn't as tall as some of the other guys at the dugout either.  I tend to imagine that given his power reputation that he should be bigger and taller than most of the team, but I need to reshape the picture in my mind's eye.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 23, 2012, 07:30:09 am
Soler does look like a man.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 23, 2012, 08:42:36 am
Does Mesa usually play their home games at HoHoKam?  I kind of thought they'd mostly play at Fitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 23, 2012, 08:46:03 am
Does Mesa usually play their home games at HoHoKam?  I kind of thought they'd mostly play at Fitch.
The AFL uses HoHoKam.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 23, 2012, 09:36:56 am
Quote from: Baseball Prospectus
Javier Baez, SS, Cubs (Low-A Peoria)
Baez went off again on Saturday, with a triple and his 10th home run of the year in just 45 games. Even with an 0-for-4 on Sunday, he's hitting .333/.388/.608 in his roughly two months of Midwest League action. That has led to some understandably excited Cubs fans wanting to move him up, but that's just not how it works. Baez still needs to refine his approach and improve his ability to recognize and hit breaking balls, but the decision isn't all about him. It's also about the fact that prospects don't develop in a vacuum. You might want to see Baez move up, but the Cubs have a shortstop they like at High-A in Arismendy Alcantara, and one at Double-A in Junior Lake. Both of them need at-bats too. The needs of a whole organization have to be considered before a prospect is promoted.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 23, 2012, 10:56:58 am
Decisions for prospects of Baez' potential should be made based on the prospect, not organizational math.  B and C prospects just need to be managed around what's best for the top guys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 23, 2012, 11:11:08 am
I would think that they should be managed around what is best for the system.  Even most top guys fail.  It is not impossible that either Lake or Alcantara could turn out to be better major leaguers than Baez.

It is not a zero sum game.  I doubt that keeping Baez in Peoria for the rest of the year is likely, all things being equal, to destroy his career.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 23, 2012, 11:46:23 am
Making a decision for Baez' development based on Lake would be like moving Rizzo to LF to keep LaHair at 1B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 23, 2012, 12:27:43 pm
But making decisions for a single player based upon what is best for the organization is what makes organizations successful.

A decision that improves the chances of Lake succeeding, while not hurting the chances of Baez succeeding is obviously a better way to go.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on July 23, 2012, 12:41:24 pm
Nice work with the numbers, tico.  You did a good job of showing that there are other guys who had similar K rates to Baez in low-A ball, and so that on its own isn't a reason to panic.

What I wonder is how many other guys put up similar numbers in low-A ball but flamed out in, say, AA, and whether there's anything instructive their numbers.  A tougher analysis to do, of course.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 23, 2012, 01:01:49 pm
Nice work with the numbers, tico.  You did a good job of showing that there are other guys who had similar K rates to Baez in low-A ball, and so that on its own isn't a reason to panic.

What I wonder is how many other guys put up similar numbers in low-A ball but flamed out in, say, AA, and whether there's anything instructive their numbers.  A tougher analysis to do, of course.

We expect a report within the next 24 hrs, so better get started tico.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: sam hannam on July 23, 2012, 01:09:08 pm

Is anybody concerned about Baez's 13 errors in his short time in Peoria?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 23, 2012, 01:11:53 pm
Is anybody concerned about Baez's 13 errors in his short time in Peoria?

No.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 23, 2012, 01:17:23 pm
How can you be sure that nobody is concerned?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on July 23, 2012, 01:21:44 pm
Didn't Jeter have a lot of errors in the minors as well?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 23, 2012, 01:23:18 pm
Baez likely won't be playing shortstop in the majors anyway.  No concern here either. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 23, 2012, 01:38:34 pm
How can you be sure that nobody is concerned?

As only my opinion matters, the question is moot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 23, 2012, 01:56:23 pm
DEFENSIVE SLUMP: 3B Josh Vitters was charged with an error in the fifth inning last night and leads all PCL third baseman with 18 errors on the year. The Cubs have committed at least one error in 16 of their last 17 games and a total of 29 errors in 19 games in July. The Cubs' 29 errors this month have led to 25 unearned runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 03:38:10 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 3 K

Vitters: 1-4, 2B, 2 K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_23_iowaaa_albaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 23, 2012, 04:50:48 pm
Since today is cut-n-past from twitter day:

albertalmora: Pro debut today! I've been waiting for this day for a long time! #pumped!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 08:23:53 pm
Baez: 0-4, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_23_peoafx_souafx_1


Daytona rained out again, Tennessee off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 23, 2012, 08:41:52 pm
Carrie Muskat ‏@CarrieMuskat
OF for #Cubs Mesa Rookie League team tonight is Shawon Dunston Jr., Albert Almora (pro debut) and Jorge Soler.


Cool.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 08:42:45 pm
It's early, but Dunston isn't looking too hot yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 23, 2012, 08:44:31 pm
It's early, but Dunston isn't looking too hot yet.

Yes.  I was more referring to those other two guys, though sentiment makes seeing Dunston's name there fun as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 08:47:56 pm
Oh, I agree. Even more fun is a probable 3-4-5 of Almora, Vogelbach and Soler.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 23, 2012, 08:49:03 pm
Oh, I agree. Even more fun is a probable 3-4-5 of Almora, Vogelbach and Soler.

How quickly we write off Baez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 08:51:58 pm
I meant in the Mesa lineup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 23, 2012, 08:52:05 pm
Dunston has been hot recently...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on July 23, 2012, 08:53:10 pm
I think Chris meant at Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 09:15:32 pm
Well there's what we get for the hype. Almora grounds out and Volgelbach and Soler both fan.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 23, 2012, 10:13:52 pm
Well there's what we get for the hype. Almora grounds out and Volgelbach and Soler both fan.

UGH!

BUST!  BUST!  BUST!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 10:35:56 pm
Almora's first professional hit is a 2-run homer.

Bust label removed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on July 23, 2012, 10:36:45 pm
...for now...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 23, 2012, 10:41:45 pm
Almora's first professional hit is a 2-run homer.

Bust label removed.

Call him up now!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 10:54:22 pm
DSL

.

Alcala: 1-4, E

Rodriguez: 5-7-4-2-0-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_23_drorok_dcurok_1


Malave: 0-2, 2 BB, SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_23_dchrok_dptrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 23, 2012, 11:15:02 pm
This should be embedding but isn't:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1XAc1JVWhg&feature=plcp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 23, 2012, 11:43:23 pm
Very. Craig's mechanical concerns are the biggest hurdle for Baez at this point, but the raw pieces for Baez are off-the-charts good. If the Cubs can tame the leg kick a little and show him he doesn't have to try and force nuclear fusion with each and every swing, look out.
...

Addressing mechanical issues like the leg kick is one thing, and can certainly be done.  Addressing whatever vision/brain activity is involved in recognizing breaking balls/spin and responding instantly and correctly is quite another.  Not sure how coachable or trainable that is, or how much repetition/experience can transform the latter.  Corey's been a pro for 15 years and pitch-recognition never really came with experience.

Often the rich get richer, the best get better.  Baez seems so gifted as a hitter that he's got  good chance to successfully adjust.   It's not like reducing the leg-kick or cutting back on his swing will take the HR power away.  I also suspect that he can make "approach" adjustments that aren't really recognition issues.  A great approach right now is guessing 1st-pitch-fastball, and killing enough of those to keep his OPS over 1.000.  He may sell out less on 1st-pitch fastballs later on, if advanced pitchers don't throw him many.

But if there is an innate problem in processing spin, that may be somewhat beyond correction.  But it's premature to guess.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 24, 2012, 12:01:34 am
Almora has a big leg-kick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 12:27:12 am
Amaya: 3-4, RBI, 2 SB, CS

Scott: 6-3-0-0-1-4,  9-1 GO/FO


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_23_boiasx_eugasx_1



Dunston: 2-4, 2B, BB, K

Almora: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, Assist

Soler: 0-5, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_23_cubrok_brrrok_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 24, 2012, 12:59:48 am
Gioskar!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 01:33:39 am
Amaya is 4th in the NWL in hitting, just 2 points out of 2nd, and is 2nd in total bases.

He also somehow leads the league in OPS by 40 points.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 02:44:44 am
Don't tell Goldstein or Law, but Dan Vogelbach has been promoted to Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 02:58:01 am
Pierce Johnson tweeted that he had his first bullpen session three days ago. Wonder why it took him so long to even do that.

Dillon Maples tweeted that he hopes to pitch on the 29th. I'm just shocked there is a Dillon Maples.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 24, 2012, 07:05:57 am
DSL Cubs1 committed 9 errors!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 24, 2012, 08:03:45 am
Don't tell Goldstein or Law, but Dan Vogelbach has been promoted to Boise.

What do they know? They claimed definitively that Dempster had been traded to the Braves yesterday.

(That's going to be my go-response anytime one of the guys who reported that says something that I don't like).  ;)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 24, 2012, 09:22:21 am
So, Johnson and Maples have left the federal witness relocation program, now how about Underwood?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 01:54:13 pm
Underwood's alive and rooming with Dunston. When he'll pitch is another question.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 24, 2012, 08:05:34 pm
Szczur has really been on a caught-stealing binge lately.  Lists with both a CS and a PO-at-1B today.  Is that one and the same?  Or did he get picked off and thrown out stealing both?  I'd hoped he was really fast/quick and was learning the base-stealing game, and would just get better.  But he hasn't been showing improvement signs lately, he's gotten thrown out a ton lately. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 24, 2012, 08:06:32 pm
Lake has matched little Brenly in HR.  Both up to 5. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 24, 2012, 08:07:50 pm
When a guy is picked off at first, and then runs to second and is thrown out, it is recorded as both a PO and a CS, even though it is on the same play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 24, 2012, 08:09:39 pm
Little Brenly is 6' 3" and 230 lbs.

Corey hasn't filled us in on anything else that may be little.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 24, 2012, 08:11:49 pm
When a guy is picked off at first, and then runs to second and is thrown out, it is recorded as both a PO and a CS, even though it is on the same play.

Thanks.  I almost feel better with him getting picked off than just getting gunned.  Probably more learning involved.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 08:20:56 pm
Szczur: 1-3, RBI, BB, SB, PO/CS

Loosen: 6-3-2-2-3-8


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_24_dbcafa_breafa_1


Chiefs off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 24, 2012, 08:26:01 pm
Szczur has really been on a caught-stealing binge lately....   he's gotten thrown out a ton lately.

For the year he is 33 and 11, or 75%.

For his major league career, Maury Wills was successful 73.8% of the time.

Szczur is still learning the finer points of the game, such as stealing.

I wouldn't be too concerned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 08:57:47 pm
Jokisch: 5-4-1-1-2-8   ( 1 or fewer runs in 8 of 11 outings )

Lake: 2-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_24_tenaax_jaxaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 24, 2012, 10:32:07 pm
Soler 2 for 3 with a homer so far today.  Dunston Jr. with a double and triple.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 10:56:00 pm
Vogelbach hitting rockets in his NWL debut

.

Candelario: 2-4, 2B, RBI

Vogelbach: 2-4, 2B  (also lined out to 2nd)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_24_yakasx_boiasx_1


Jackson: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB, 3 K

Vitters: 1-4, 2 RBI, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_24_iowaaa_orhaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 11:00:14 pm
Emeterio: 1-3, RBI, SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_24_dcurok_drorok_1


Araujo: 2-2-1-0-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_24_dptrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 24, 2012, 11:18:51 pm
Brett Jackson sure dont look anywhere near ready for the show yet.

Vitters on the other hand...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 24, 2012, 11:32:08 pm
Almora: 0-5, 2 RBI, Assist

Soler: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI, K

Blackburn: 2-1-0-0-0-1

McNeil: 1-2-1-1-1-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_24_clerok_cubrok_1


Law was at the game again and said Blackburn looked better than last time out (89-91 mph).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 25, 2012, 02:37:57 am
That's a crazy line for Almora tonight - 0 for 5, 2 RBI, 2 R, 0 BB, 0 HBP. I assume some of the Indians' six errors contributed to that. Generally, I'd say a guy who scores two runs and drives in two more runs got the job done.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 25, 2012, 10:08:59 am
Nice story on Boise pitcher Ian Dickson

Quote

On Tuesday, Dickson turned in the finest outing of his young Minor League career. The New York native fired six no-hit innings and the short-season Boise Hawks carried the bid into the eighth frame en route to a 2-1 win over the Yakima Bears.


http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120724&content_id=35517478&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb (http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120724&content_id=35517478&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 25, 2012, 01:09:17 pm
Quote
Ian Dickson was outstanding – by far the best outing of the season for the former Lafayette start, retiring the first 15 men in order.  However, officially, he allowed one hit – as an error charged to Stephen Bruno on a grounder into the hole by Ronnie Freeman was changed this morning to a hit.

Roster moves continue – as the Hawks roster has been maxed out with the addition of Dan Vogelbach (boy does he have a quick, strong bat) and the addition of Justin Amlung (12th Round, Louisville) today.  Though the Hawks do not have the full allotment of players in Boise, they are hamstrung by the Cubs farm system, who has too many players in Mesa – which means there are players on the Hawks roster (Pierce Johnson, Brian Smith, Rashad Crawford) who have never came to Boise, but are on their DL to free up space in Mesa.

http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/2012/07/25/near-perfect/ (http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/2012/07/25/near-perfect/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2012, 01:24:00 pm
Lake with another homer today so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on July 25, 2012, 01:51:59 pm
maybe one or two of these lesser drafted pitching prospects turns out to be useful...several intriquing lesser P's in our minors for sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2012, 02:07:22 pm
"several intriquing lesser P's in our minors for sure."

Anyone in particular?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 25, 2012, 02:27:30 pm
Lake with his second home run of the day, and third in two days.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 25, 2012, 02:59:57 pm
Lake with his second home run of the day, and third in two days.

Man, he's so frustrating.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 25, 2012, 03:16:53 pm
Less so on days when he hits 2 HRs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 25, 2012, 03:21:38 pm
Lake: 2-5, 2 HR, 4 RBI, BB

McNutt: 2-0-0-0-0-3, 2 HB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_25_tenaax_jaxaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 25, 2012, 03:46:24 pm
Less so on days when he hits 2 HRs.

Actually, that just makes it worse.  He's got all those tools and just can't seem to put it all together.  He's a less talented Alfonso Soriano.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 25, 2012, 07:08:54 pm
It might be worth a trip or two up to Mesa to see the Solar Sox this October.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 25, 2012, 07:09:40 pm
Soler Sox?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 25, 2012, 09:40:28 pm
Szczur: 0-2, 2 BB, 3 SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_25_breafa_dbcafa_1


Szczur: 2-3, SB, K   
   

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_25_breafa_dbcafa_2



Szczur since the break:   .337, 22 BB, 17 K, 19 SB  in  104 AB's
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 25, 2012, 10:13:48 pm
Baez: 2-5, RBI, E   ( 1 walk last 120 at-bats )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_25_cedafx_peoafx_1



Jackson: 1-4, K, HBP

Vitters: 0-5, RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_25_iowaaa_orhaaa_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 25, 2012, 11:00:56 pm
...

Szczur since the break:   .337, 22 BB, 17 K, 19 SB  in  104 AB's

That is some pretty WOW production.  .907 OPS over that span with a .445 OBP.  He must have a pretty snazzy BABIP over that period.  Hard to ht .337 when you've got 17K and no over-the-wall HR's.  Still, that is really remarkable OBP work and SB volume.  I love it.  It really would be fun to have a guy who was just a professional massive OBP leadoff man, AND who could actually run well enough to steal.  Seems we've had guys who batted first because they were fast, without having good OBP.  And some OBP-oriented.  But never both qualities in the same player. 

A-ball doesn't have the most polished catchers or the the most runner-sensitive pitchers.  But base-stealing may be one of the qualities that isn't that much harder, if at all, in the majors.  weatherguy used to comment how often AAA and even AA might have as good or better catch-and-throw defenders than the majors. A good-glove catcher can get a long ways in the minors, but a lot of the catchers in the majors are there because they can hit.  So perhaps if Szczur can continue the high-volume base-stealing in AA and eventually AAA, it won't be that unlikely that he might perhaps carry it to the majors.  But I think the catch-and-throw standard is probably a lot better in AA than A. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 25, 2012, 11:08:12 pm
Someone put up a short video of a diving Szczur catch from Tuesday's game. Watch full screen to see it best.

http://yfrog.com/5es72z
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 25, 2012, 11:31:07 pm
Amaya: 2-4, 2B, SF, RBI

Vogelbach: 3-5, 2B, RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_25_yakasx_boiasx_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 26, 2012, 12:18:48 am
Mesa Solar Sox coaching staff - 2012
   
Manager           Rodney Linares (Astros)   
Pitching Coach   Matt Herges (Dodgers)   
Hitting Coach    Brian Harper (Cubs)   
Trainers           Aaron Scott (Orioles), Corey Tremble (Tigers)

Brian Harper is the Manager of Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 12:19:45 am
Malave: 2-5, 2 2B, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_25_dphrok_dchrok_1


Paulino: 5-0-0-0-2-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_25_dcurok_dtwrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 01:43:22 am
Article on Vogelbach:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/07/26/2202632/new-hawk-brings-big-bat-humor.html


Note at the end says Justin Amlung has been promoted to Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 26, 2012, 05:31:35 am
Someone put up a short video of a diving Szczur catch from Tuesday's game. Watch full screen to see it best.

http://yfrog.com/5es72z

Hard to tell for sure from that camera shot, but it looked as if he covered an awful lot of ground on that catch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 26, 2012, 07:55:41 am
Gioskar!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 26, 2012, 09:48:56 am
Highlights from Boise's 10-8 loss to Yakima Wednesday night


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XphUPVh8lc&feature=player_embedded#t=1s
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 03:52:25 pm
Callis chat:


Quote
John (Boston): What is the ceiling of Javier Baez? Are there any questions about his strike zone discipline?


Jim Callis: Huge ceiling. He has a big-time bat and has played a better shortstop than expected, to the point where he might be able to stay there. His biggest need right now is to tone down his approach at the plate, though it's hard to argue with the results



Quote
Matt C (Ankeny, IA): Is Dillon Maples hurt? Cubs #1 prospect if you wrote the Top 10 today - Baez or Soler? Thanks!


Jim Callis: Maples tweaked his elbow earlier in the year and the Cubs have exercised extreme caution. I'd have Baez No. 1 . . . don't forget about Almora, either.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 26, 2012, 07:11:49 pm
Szczur got picked off yet again, but he's got two singles and a walk.  For the moment he's gotten his OPS over .800, and won't have enough AB's to lose it tonight.  Good for him.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 07:51:24 pm
That Szczur pickoff went down as just a pickoff, no caught stealing. Going back to a recent conversation here, I'm thinking if the runner is nabbed diving back into 1st, it's just a PO, but if the runner makes a dash for 2nd, then it's a PO and CS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 26, 2012, 08:23:28 pm
Chris, that makes sense, I think you're right. 

To some degree, it would be nice to have a better record-keeping of that.  We have ideas of what SB/CS ratio is needed for the value to justify the cost.  But isn't CS under-counting the cost?  If a guy is getting picked off and tagged out at 1B, that has the same cost as getting thrown out at 2nd. But if it's not getting recorded under the CS column, aren't we then forgetting a number of bad outcomes? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 08:31:10 pm
Not only that, but you never know how many caught stealing stats are purely from getting thrown out by the catcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 08:31:51 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2 RBI, BB, K, PO


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_26_dbcafa_braafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 26, 2012, 08:37:11 pm
Jae-Hoon Ha "seriously" injured tonight...

http://smokiesonradio.com/2012/07/26/jae-hoon-ha-injury-update/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 26, 2012, 09:15:33 pm
Hopefully Ha is ok. Odd that he was playing right and Logan Watkins was in center given Ha's repuation as a defensive CF and Logan's history as a middle infielder.

If Ha is out for an extended period, seems like the time is good to call up Szczur in term so of his (Matt's) performance as of late.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 09:56:15 pm
Lake: 3-5, 2B, RBI, 2 SB

Zych: 2-5-2-2-0-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_26_tenaax_jaxaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 26, 2012, 10:02:52 pm
Almora gets his first inside-the-park hit as a pro.  Soler gets his first walk as a pro. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 10:07:37 pm
Baez: 2-2, 2B, SF, 2 RBI, HBP

Jensen: 6-4-2-2-0-6


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_26_cedafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 10:55:51 pm
Vitters: 3-4, 2B, 3B, RBI, BB, K, PO/CS

Jackson: 0-3, BB, 3 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_26_iowaaa_orhaaa_1


Vogelbach: 1-4

Arias: 6 IP, R


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_26_yakasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 26, 2012, 10:58:31 pm
Damn who does Josh Vitters have to bang to get called up?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 26, 2012, 11:23:09 pm
Vitters has been rather pedestrian since the break with poor K/BB ratios. Maybe in September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 12:11:59 am
Soler: 1-4, SB, BB, K

Almora: 1-5, 2B, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_26_cubrok_rngrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 12:54:41 am
DSL1 scored 7 in the 6th, 3 in the 7th and 12 in the 8th.


Alcala: 5-6, 2B, 3B, RBI, E

Emeterio: 1-3, 2 BB, CS


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_26_dtwrok_dcurok_1


Torrez: 5-4-1-1-0-4

Malave: 2-5, SB, BB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_26_dchrok_dphrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on July 27, 2012, 06:29:50 am
It will be interesting to see where Baez is ranked in prospect lists next year.  He was in the 70's this year I would think he takes a huge jump.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 27, 2012, 07:12:32 am
Damn who does Josh Vitters have to bang to get called up?

Who does Vitters have to bang?

How about the baseball?

OPS is the best single measure for hitters, and Vitters right now has an OPS of .869 for the season.  Rizzo had an OPS of 1.101 when he was called up -- 232 points better.  Adrian Cardenas has an OPS of .915, 46 points better than Vitters.  Vitters currently ranks 58th in the PCL in OPS, among batters with 113 or more plate appearances.

Don't get me wrong -- for his age, Vitters is doing well, and may earn a September callup, but it is wrong to suggest that his hitting this season cries out for an immediate callup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 27, 2012, 07:14:58 am
Funny stat:  Daury Torres has allowed more HR (5) than walks (4). 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 27, 2012, 08:49:02 am
11th rounder Rashad Crawford has hit the 60 day DL.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/07/minor-league-transactions-july-19-23/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on July 27, 2012, 09:10:38 am
Buff, I'd say Baez will be very very high -- top 20. His .OPS is higher than any of the qualifiers in the MWL (pretty sure), and is something like 225 points higher than Francisco Lindor's -- Lindor is the other Puerto Rican-born shortstop taken 1 pick ahead of Baez in the 2011 draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 27, 2012, 10:01:37 am
Mildly interesting Boise highlights - including a nice Candelario-Amaya-Shoulders DP.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XkcbcuGoCs&feature=player_embedded#t=0s
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 27, 2012, 10:04:59 am
I think you'd have to say the Vogelbach, Amaya, Hernandez, and Candelario infield is definitely one of the most promising short season infields we've had in a long time . . . maybe ever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2012, 10:16:23 am
And Hernandez is having a disappointing year.  If he starts to play the way he has been expected to play, it gets a lot more interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 27, 2012, 10:45:23 am
Jae-Hoon Ha "seriously" injured tonight...

http://smokiesonradio.com/2012/07/26/jae-hoon-ha-injury-update/
He's sidelined for 7-14 days with a concussion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 27, 2012, 10:54:09 am
Im not the one who used the word "serious". That was on Facebook. I found the link of Facebook and the announcer used the word "serious".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on July 27, 2012, 02:05:10 pm
davep- right off the top of my head, the lower P prospects that intrique me are Jensen, DelValle, Jokisch, Struck and Torrez in DSL
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on July 27, 2012, 02:33:33 pm
Struck is pretty unintriguing...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 27, 2012, 02:45:22 pm
Buff, I'd say Baez will be very very high -- top 20. His .OPS is higher than any of the qualifiers in the MWL (pretty sure), and is something like 225 points higher than Francisco Lindor's -- Lindor is the other Puerto Rican-born shortstop taken 1 pick ahead of Baez in the 2011 draft.

Baez is already #25 in the BA mid-season prospect ranking from a couple weeks ago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 03:16:38 pm
Quote
No. 11    JUNIOR LAKE, SS CUBS
Team: Double-A Tennessee (Chicago)     

Age: 22

Why He's Here: .400/.438/.800 (12-for-30) 6 R, 3 2B, 3 HR, 8 RBIs, 1 BB, 7 SO, 2-for-2 SB

The Scoop: Lake missed all of April recovering from a back injury and his power was slow to return. He hit four homers in his first two months, but he nearly matched that total this week by crushing three bombs. This hot week has pushed his season line to .290/.341/.430, an above-average line in the Southern League. The 6-foot-2, 215-pound Lake primarily played shortstop in the lower minors, but with one of the strongest arms in the minors he's played about a third of his games at third base this season.


In The Team Photo:

Quote
It's been a big year for Cubs 3B Josh Vitters. After seemingly being stuck in neutral for two years, the third overall pick in the 2007 draft has put together his best year since low Class A. The 22-year-old Vitters is walking more, hitting for more power and continuing to hit for average. This week he hit .379/.419/.759 (11-for-29) with two home runs and 11 RBIs. He may not be a star in the making, but he has a decent shot at being a productive big leaguer . . .


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613789.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 27, 2012, 03:37:50 pm
Matt Szczur promoted to Tennessee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 27, 2012, 03:45:53 pm
Might be time to check out the Smokies now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 27, 2012, 03:56:20 pm
Matt Szczur promoted to Tennessee.
As Len and Bob just discussed, the move follows the injury to Jae-Hoon Ha
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on July 27, 2012, 04:05:00 pm
September might be interesting with Vitters, Sczur, Jackson, Cardenas, and Lake at Wrigley.

Too bad there's no pitching help in the system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 27, 2012, 04:06:51 pm
Szczur story

(http://www.bleachernation.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/matt-szczur-daytona-cubs.jpg)

http://smokiesonradio.com/ (http://smokiesonradio.com/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 27, 2012, 04:12:15 pm
Quote from: Daytona press release
The Daytona Cubs have benefited tremendously from Szczur's ability to produce clutch hits. With runners in
scoring position and two outs, Szczur hit .423 (11-26), and was hitting .500 with the bases loaded.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 27, 2012, 04:22:36 pm
September might be interesting with Vitters, Sczur, Jackson, Cardenas, and Lake at Wrigley.
No worries over Iowa or Tennessee needing them for the playoffs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2012, 04:37:11 pm
I would be surprised if Ceasar is called up this September.  The others have a better chance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on July 27, 2012, 04:55:11 pm
Re Szczur Sept call-up, may depend in part on whether Soriano or LaHair is moved.  Szczur is already on 40-man and if one of above is gone, there's some playing time for both Jackson and Szczur if that's the development strategy.  Let's see what Szczur does in the 120 or so ABs he can get at AA (assuming he stays when Ha gets back).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 05:04:38 pm
John Sickels looks at what his pre-season Cubs top 20 list is doing:


http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/7/27/3192443/chicago-cubs-2012-top-20-pre-season-prospects-in-review
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 27, 2012, 06:42:00 pm
Matt Szczur lead off the game for Tennessee by lining out to second base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 27, 2012, 07:07:47 pm
John Sickels looks at what his pre-season Cubs top 20 list is doing:


http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/7/27/3192443/chicago-cubs-2012-top-20-pre-season-prospects-in-review

If Rizzo is a B+, what constitutes an A?

edit-tho on second thought, I guess that's the preseason grade
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2012, 07:58:18 pm
Whitenack finally with a decent game.  5 innings, 2 hits, 0 runs, 4 strike outs.  The only bad sign - three walks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 08:13:36 pm
Whitenack: 5-2-0-0-3-4,  9-1 GO/FO


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_27_dbcafa_braafa_1


Acosta: 0-4, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_27_dacrok_dchrok_1


Alcala: 0-4, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_27_dcurok_dparok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 09:04:35 pm
Szczur: 0-4, 2 K

Lake: 2-4, 2 2B, 2 RBI, 2 K, E

Rosscup: 3-2/3 -0-2-2-2-6


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_27_tenaax_jaxaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on July 27, 2012, 09:05:27 pm
Wow -- Junior Lake is on fire this week. Tonight with the game in progress,  he is 2-4 with 2 doubles and 2 RBI's. He's really had a great week at the plate. I guess the game is over now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 10:01:57 pm
Baez: 2-3, HR, 2 RBI, BB   (only out was on a drive caught in the deepest part of the park)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_27_cedafx_peoafx_1



Vitters: 1-4, BB, K

Jackson: 1-4, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_27_iowaaa_orhaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 27, 2012, 10:02:26 pm
Volstad with 8 shutout innings today.  Time to bring him up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on July 27, 2012, 10:03:44 pm
The other team didn't show up?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 27, 2012, 10:12:25 pm
That psychologist is working wonders at getting Triple-A hitters out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 10:18:16 pm
After Baez' homer tonight, he stopped at home plate and had some sort of chat with either the umpire or the catcher depending on which source you believe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 11:14:55 pm
Amaya: 2-5, 3B, 2 RBI, 2 K

Vogelbach: 2-3, 2B, RBI, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_27_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 27, 2012, 11:43:28 pm
Almora: 1-4, 2B

Soler: 2-4, RBI, SB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_27_athrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 01:00:58 am
Chiefs highlights from Friday including Baez' long home run.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIdAgG9AjFk
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 28, 2012, 01:10:45 am
Man - that was a bomb.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 28, 2012, 01:43:15 am
Gioskar!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 01:48:56 am
Quote
Baez followed by crushing a 1-and-1 pitch from Tromblee high and deep into the night sky. The ball easily cleared the grassy berm beyond left field and landed on the concrete patio. A young fan chased down the ball.

“I was sitting on slider and he threw me one,” Baez said.

The two-run shot gave the Chiefs their first lead of the night. Baez paused briefly while crossing home plate before being chased back to the dugout by home plate umpire James Rackley.

“I was just saying hello to their catcher (Able Baker),” Baez said.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 01:53:42 am
Chat with BA's Jim Shonerd:


Quote
trok (North Side): What kind of tools does Dan Vogelbach possess? He's already been promoted, so he must be doing some good things. Is he a 1B/DH for sure?


Jim Shonerd: He's 6-foot, 250 pounds, and there's no doubt first base will be his defensive home. But, his bat can carry him. He's got tremendous raw power and enough feel for hitting to put up solid averages.


Quote
Bolita (Illinois): Javier Baez or Xander Bogaerts? Who is the better prospect?


Jim Shonerd: I'll take Baez. Better chance to stay at short and scouts see the bat being a bit louder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 03:13:47 am
Another piece on Vogelbach:

http://www.idahopress.com/sports/localpro/hawks/boise-s-vogelbach-displaying-more-than-big-time-power/article_e9685bf6-d886-11e1-8ecc-001a4bcf887a.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 03:32:37 am
Article on 8th-rounder Michael Heesh:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/07/28/2205663/hawks-pitcher-has-yet-to-give.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 05:01:16 am
Hawks highlights:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4Bhb4LFKIw&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 28, 2012, 07:49:35 am
Vogelbach has had opposite field extra-base hits in each of the last couple of Boise highlights that I've watched.  He's got a really different-looking swing on those opposite-field hits than most guys in the little highlight videos.  Really, really short and late-commit.  Almost looks a little choppy, he waits so long and has almost no loading.  Very different from the big leg-kick-loadup that Baez uses, or Almara seems to.  Looks almost more like the swing you'd expect from a little guy who's just trying to put the ball in play.  Very promising, I think. 

Interesting that Baez said he was "guessing", I suspect he may do that quite a lot.  But was guessing slider, and he killed it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 28, 2012, 07:56:18 am
This is very encouraging to me.

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/07/28/2205663/hawks-pitcher-has-yet-to-give.html

No, not this part: Hawks rookie Michael Heesch kept his ERA at zero after two innings of work in the Hawks’ 8-3 win over the Tri-City Dust Devils on Friday night at Memorial Stadium.  Heesch, the only pitcher on the Hawks roster who hasn’t allowed a run, has appeared in six games and pitched 12 innings since joining the team.  “He’s super-talented, and a big, strong healthy kid,” pitching coach David Rosario said. “He has a great arm and great potential, especially being a left-hander.”  Heesch, at 6-foot-5, 210 pounds, is an imposing presence on the mound.

THIS part: Heesch was a starter in college, but after pitching 120 innings this season, the Cubs are bringing him along slowly as he begins his pro career.  “He’s only pitching two innings every five days,” Rosario said. “(The Cubs) want to make sure we don’t over-use him. … It’s too bad we can’t use him more, but the main thing for him now is to stay healthy.”  Rosario said.... “Next year, he’s going to be a starter, absolutely.”

While the farm may be thin on quality arms right now, and I am not suggesting at all that 12 shutout innings at Boise means this guy will make the majors, the team will be much better off being extra cautious with young arms.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 28, 2012, 08:42:47 am
Heesh has yet to walk a batter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 28, 2012, 08:56:19 am
Chiefs highlights from Friday including Baez' long home run.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIdAgG9AjFk

First time I've seen palm trees in Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 28, 2012, 09:59:33 am
If Heesh is only at 90-92 as a reliever, I think he is probably destined to be a reliever, assuming he ever makes it to the majors.  The inevitable couple mph drop as a starter when your only very low 90's is going to hurt.  Of course, he's a big guy; maybe he keeps or even improves his velocity, but I would think it unlikely.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 28, 2012, 10:41:32 am
 “He’s super-talented, and a big, strong healthy kid,...  He has a great arm and great potential."  More than expected for a 22-year-old senior at minimum-wage $10K.  Rosario was the valedictorian of Hendry-Fleita's school of gush hyperbole. 

Scouts work really hard to make a find.  Nobody gave any consideration to these $10K slot-saver guys.  But even there the scouts are looking for actual talent.  90-92 lefties with control don't seem inherently underqualified.  Maybe Heesch will become a servicable lefty reliever and become the poster-boy for a happily-ever-after $10K slot-saver success story.  Good luck to him. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 28, 2012, 10:46:53 am
“He’s super-talented, and a big, strong healthy kid,...  He has a great arm and great potential."  More than expected for a 22-year-old senior at minimum-wage $10K.  Rosario was the valedictorian of Hendry-Fleita's school of gush hyperbole. 

Scouts work really hard to make a find.  Nobody gave any consideration to these $10K slot-saver guys.  But even there the scouts are looking for actual talent.  90-92 lefties with control don't seem inherently under-qualified.  Maybe Heesch will become a serviceable lefty reliever and become the poster-boy for a happily-ever-after $10K slot-saver success story.  Good luck to him. 


true, for 10k, a serviceable lefty reliever would be awesome
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 28, 2012, 10:53:56 am
Quote
More than expected for a 22-year-old senior at minimum-wage $10K.  Rosario was the valedictorian of Hendry-Fleita's school of gush hyperbole.
 

Yeah I wonder if the Idaho Statesman might be putting a little too much puff in some of these profiles they've done on Hawks players.  Not too long ago, they were talking about Simpson getting his fastball back up to 92 and then he turned around and got hammered again right after that.  That was an article that I'm still taking with a healthy dose of skepticism.

We'll see how things go I guess.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 28, 2012, 10:57:50 am
If Heesh is only at 90-92 as a reliever, I think he is probably destined to be a reliever, assuming he ever makes it to the majors.  The inevitable couple mph drop as a starter when your only very low 90's is going to hurt.  Of course, he's a big guy; maybe he keeps or even improves his velocity, but I would think it unlikely.

How Heesh himself does is almost beside the point.  The important thing is the the Cubs recognize that the total number of innings on young arms is a serious concern and they are taking steps to limit the kind of injuries which end careers, or leave them seriously short of what they could have been.  That is what is encouraging.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 28, 2012, 11:04:22 am
I think that the fact that the Cubs actually drafted someone with good control is a good sign.  Previously, unless a pitcher could throw over 95 or was at least 6' 5", they ignored him.  An awful lot of major league pitchers throw 90 - 92 with good control.

I am not saying that Heesh is a good prospect.  I am just saying that, along with a lot of guys with mid 90s fastballs and control problems, we should have a few like Heesh.  Some of them might make it, and in the meantime, we haven't lost anything.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 28, 2012, 01:22:36 pm
If Heesh is a lefty that throws 88, he can be a starter in the Majors.  Velocity seems like it's down the list of required attributes for lefties.  I think command and control are what scouts look for most in left-handed starters with mediocre velocity.  If he's got those and has decent secondary pitches, he probably has a chance to start.

Whether he'll actually be good enough to make it all the way to the Major Leagues is probably going to hinge on something other than his velocity.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 28, 2012, 01:29:52 pm
Heesh is rather old for the Northwest, so his success can't be read as making him a top prospect.  I suspect that they swing at pitches in the Northwest league that more experienced and older batters would take for balls.

Nonetheless, it gives more cause for hope than if he were getting bombed and walking a lot.

Hope springs eternal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 28, 2012, 02:31:18 pm
Vogelbach can really put a stick on it.

He's definitely caught my eye.

It dont matter that we've already got Rizzo.

If Vogelbach keeps hitting we can always move him for something of value we do need.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 28, 2012, 06:00:24 pm
Vogelbach can really put a stick on it.

It dont matter that we've already got Rizzo.

If Vogelbach keeps hitting we can always move him for something of value we do need.

Or we can do as the Giants did when they had a young Orlando Cepeda and a young Willie McCovey.... keep and play them both and go to the WS with them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 08:16:01 pm
Szczur: 1-4, BB, Assist

Bour: 2-4, GS, 5 RBI   -  Second half: .333 (46-138), 31 RBI, .890 OPS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_28_tenaax_jaxaax_1



Torreyes: 3-5, 2B, HR, 3 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_28_dbcafa_braafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 08:54:23 pm
Jackson: 1-3, HR, RBI, SB, BB, K

Vitters: 1-3, BB, SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_28_iowaaa_nozaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 09:53:49 pm
Baez: 0-4, 2 K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_28_belafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 28, 2012, 10:00:44 pm
Torreyes en fuego!!!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 28, 2012, 10:34:33 pm
Vitters: 1-3, BB, SB
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_28_iowaaa_nozaaa_1

Vitters has walked in 4 of his last 5 games. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 28, 2012, 10:46:49 pm
Call him up.

Or call up Cardenas.

I am a big advocate of giving prospects a LONG tryout, but Valbuena just doesn't seem to be ready to do it right now.  If you are afraid of losing Valbuena on waivers, then trade Baker for ANYTHING at all and then put Valbuena on the bench until next spring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 10:54:47 pm
Scott: 5-4-0-0-3-4,  7-1 GO/FO

Candelario: 1-3, RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_28_triasx_boiasx_1


Mesa rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 28, 2012, 10:58:58 pm
Alcala: 2-5, 2B, 3B, RBI, E

Sanchez: 1-3, HR, 3 RBI, BB, K

Rodriguez:  5-1/3 -6-3-2-2-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_28_dparok_dcurok_1


Pieters: 1/3 -2-4-4-2-1, 3 HB

Malave: 2-5, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_28_dchrok_dacrok_1




Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 28, 2012, 11:34:31 pm
Tayler Scott is looking fairly good at Boise.  He isn't old for the league, and he was described when drafted as extremely raw.  His obviously needs work on his command, but it hasn't been terrible.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 28, 2012, 11:50:28 pm
Im glad somebody else sees that it's time to call up Vitters.

He'd be my everyday 3rd baseman for the rest of the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 28, 2012, 11:53:39 pm
Actually, I would prefer calling up Cardenas.  In a perfect world I would like to see Vitters stay in Iowa until September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 29, 2012, 12:38:30 am
Tayler Scott is looking fairly good at Boise.  He isn't old for the league, and he was described when drafted as extremely raw.  His obviously needs work on his command, but it hasn't been terrible.

Scott was born and raised in South Africa. He came to the U.S. to attend some baseball camps, then pitched two years of HS ball here. Wilken drafted him in the fifth round of the 2011 draft. He's very raw, but also has tons of potential.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 29, 2012, 06:43:46 am
Actually, I would prefer calling up Cardenas.  In a perfect world I would like to see Vitters stay in Iowa until September.

Valbuena's struggles create no reason at all to call up Vitters.  This is quite obviously a long way from perfect world, but none of those imperfections create any reason to call up Vitters.

If the Theocracy believe there is any chance at all for either Vitters or Cardenas to have any value at all as major leaguers, they should bring them up when it appears they have the best chance of success, not before, and not just to replace Valbuena, or to give fans a new body to watch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2012, 09:23:45 am
Valbuena's struggles do not create a reason to call up Vitters, but Valbuena's struggles DO ELIMINATE a reason NOT to call up Vitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 29, 2012, 09:41:56 am
How about Vitters smoking the ball all year in Iowa?

That's reason to call him up.

Now someone go ahead and bring up a 2-3 week period in which he didnt smoke the ball just to make themselves feel smart.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 29, 2012, 09:53:34 am
Boise highlights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1uwFIk4Bxs&feature=player_detailpage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1uwFIk4Bxs&feature=player_detailpage)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 29, 2012, 10:19:26 am
How about Vitters smoking the ball all year in Iowa?

That's reason to call him up.

Now someone go ahead and bring up a 2-3 week period in which he didnt smoke the ball just to make themselves feel smart.

jiggs, it is not a 2-3 week period, it is the entire season.

As I have pointed out before, while Vitters is making nice progress and is doing a good deal to redeem his prospect status, he has not been 'smoking the ball all year at Iowa," unless you want to consider what ranking 54th in his league in OPS is "smoking" the ball.... which presumably would mean that 53 other PCL players also should be called up now.

Vitters has an OPS of .867.  Not at all bad, particularly given his age, but Valbuena, who is struggling mightily now in the majors, was doing better in Iowa than Vitters is.  Valbuena had an OPS of .885, had the exact same .303 BA, was walking WAY more often, and had a slugging percentage only 3 points less.  There is an entire PCL team with an OPS only 13 points below Vitters.  Vitters' OPS is not even 100 points better than Iowa's team OPS.

Cardenas has an Iowa OPS of .916, meaning he is "smoking" the ball much more than Vitters, and for the Cubs this year it is an OPS of .555.

EVERY time Vitters has been promoted he has done very poorly to start.  So why not call him up in September when the competition will be a bit weaker and he might not struggle quite so much?

Or at least why not wait until he is in fact dominating his league?  He hasn't even dominated his TEAM, four different players have had a higher OPS this year after more than 100 AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 29, 2012, 03:48:13 pm
Baez with a single, a Sac fly, and a WALK in his first three times up.  Two walks in three games.  I don't think it was intentional, since there were runners on 1st and 2nd.  The opposite-field sac fly may perhaps have been deep; not only did guy score from 3rd, but runner on 1st tagged and advanced.  Or maybe it was shallow enough to command a throw to the plate and the runner on 1st advanced on the throw.  Either way, sounds like three good AB's.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2012, 04:23:39 pm
Baez' sac fly was hit to the warning track according to the Chiefs' twitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 29, 2012, 04:53:44 pm
OF Jeff Frazier has joined the Iowa Cubs.  He had been with Detroit's AAA team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2012, 05:02:17 pm
Baez: 1-3, SF, 2 RBI, BB

Geiger: 2-4, 2B, HR, 4 RBI, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_29_belafx_peoafx_1



Smokies off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2012, 07:07:44 pm
Torreyes: 3-4, 2 RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_29_dbcafa_braafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 29, 2012, 07:38:49 pm
Torreyes: 3-4, 2 RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_29_dbcafa_braafa_1

That dude is raking in the second half of the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 29, 2012, 08:28:52 pm
But the key to the trade was Wood.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 29, 2012, 08:40:25 pm
That dude is raking in the second half of the season.

.357/.386/.500/.886 in his last 10 games.

.330/   .400/   .523/   .923 in June.

.326/   .376/   .446/   .822 in July.

Of course as hot as he has been the last two months, he was even colder the first two.

.230/   .306/   .324/   .630 in April.

.137/   .190/   .192/   .382 in May.

His May has to be among the worst months seen from a serious prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 29, 2012, 08:41:18 pm
But the key to the trade was Wood.

Some saw Torreyes as the key to the trade before the season started.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2012, 08:42:41 pm
Idiots.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 29, 2012, 09:03:55 pm
Torreyes has a horrible BABIP, only .270.  It's rare for a decent contact hitter to BABIP below .300.  If he was .300 on the season, he'd be hitting like .289, have an OBP over .350, and have an OPS over .750.  His BABIP is plenty good the last two months (.342), and was plenty fine last year (.375).  So I don't think their is much reason to expect that he'll be a perpetual low-BABIP guy, or that his composite .270 BABIP projects forward.  Whatever it was that caused low BABIP in spring would appear to be fluke.  His HR/K rate is good, and he K's so little that his non-BIP average should create almost no depression on his BABIP. 

Only 7 errors.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 29, 2012, 09:29:41 pm
milb is listing Maples as the starter tonight. 

Amaya with another HR, #5 in 40 games. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on July 29, 2012, 09:40:48 pm
Torreyes has a horrible BABIP, only .270.  It's rare for a decent contact hitter to BABIP below .300.  If he was .300 on the season, he'd be hitting like .289, have an OBP over .350, and have an OPS over .750.  His BABIP is plenty good the last two months (.342), and was plenty fine last year (.375).  So I don't think their is much reason to expect that he'll be a perpetual low-BABIP guy, or that his composite .270 BABIP projects forward.  Whatever it was that caused low BABIP in spring would appear to be fluke.  His HR/K rate is good, and he K's so little that his non-BIP average should create almost no depression on his BABIP. 

He reportedly had some hand or wrist problem at the start of the season and it apparently was keeping him from hitting the ball with any authority at all, leading to the poor BABIP during that period.

If he stays healthy, he could be part of the reason the Cubs start to be very interesting in 2014.

Next year.... not so much.

By 2015, the Cubs could have solid players at every position, developed thru their own system, with no one other than a catcher as old as 28, most of them very easy to root for, most with high ceilings, and several of them with other very high ceiling guys in the pipeline.

It could actually start being fun to root for the Cubs again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 29, 2012, 09:42:08 pm
Amaya's certainly stepped up this year.  I remember I was a little surprised when Marco Hernandez was rated as a better prospect than Amaya, when I think most of us thought that Amaya was the prospect to watch last year for Mesa.

The only caveat on his season, though, . . . it's still Boise and he's still facing a lot of 15th round picks, 30th round picks, undrafted guys, etc.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2012, 09:48:14 pm
Hernandez is an excellent defensive shortstop who they thought would develop power (who knows, perhaps he will).  Amaya is a great contact hitter, but is not expected to develop a lot of power, and his defense wasn't much better than average last year.

This year, Hernandez has struggled, while Amaya has improved defensively, and has even hit with a little power.  I am sure that Amaya will be rated much higher this year than Hernandez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2012, 09:50:03 pm
Jackson: 0-3, SB, BB, 2 K

Vitters: 1-5, SB, 2 K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_29_iowaaa_nozaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2012, 10:05:00 pm
Maples goes one inning.  Gives up no hits, but walks two and hits a batter, giving up a run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 29, 2012, 10:55:36 pm
Amaya: 2-3, HR, RBI, BB, SB, E

Candelario: 1-3, BB

Ackerman: 4-1-0-0-0-6


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_29_triasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2012, 11:22:14 pm
Hunter Ackerman is a lefty that can reach 96 - 97, but has had severe control problems in the past.  He has performed extremely well this year in a small sample size.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on July 29, 2012, 11:31:40 pm
Hunter Ackerman is a lefty that can reach 96 - 97, but has had severe control problems in the past.  He has performed extremely well this year in a small sample size.

Thanks Dave.  Hadn't heard he could get THAT fast before.  I'd thought the original reports was that he had a good curveball, when it got over the plate.   When drafted as a super-raw teenager, I think they said 91-92 then.  So it's entirely plausible that he's bumped that up since. 

Do we know what his injury was this spring, that kept him out of action so long? 

He's been terrific thus far.  21 now, so he's got time. 

Might be a nice pure-scouting selection by Wilken and the Virginia guy.  (Swope?  No, maybe a different scout, the one who got Dubois and Nitro Nic Jackson years back, whose name is escaping me now...)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 29, 2012, 11:54:30 pm
ArizonaPhil mentioned what the injury was, but I don't remember it.  I Don't remember it as being serious.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 30, 2012, 12:13:57 am
Almora: 1-4, SB, E

Soler: 1-3, 2B, BB

Blackburn: 2-1/3 -2-0-0-0-2

Maples: 1-0-1-1-2-1, HB, WP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_29_cubrok_cinrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 30, 2012, 01:29:19 am
Boise manager Mark Johnson gushing about Wilson Contreras:


Quote
“He can be a frontline catcher, no doubt,” said Hawks manager Mark Johnson, who spent parts of eight seasons as a catcher in the major leagues.

....

“As far as physical things that he does behind the plate, he’s a special, special catcher, he really is.”

Johnson said Contreras’ arm strength rates on the scouting scale as an 80 — out of 80.

“He’s got a (Ivan) Pudge Rodriguez arm, basically,” Johnson said.


http://www.idahopress.com/members/hawks-contreras-catching-on-at-new-positions/article_420e0652-d945-11e1-a6c8-0019bb2963f4.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 30, 2012, 09:02:54 am
Quote
“He can be a frontline catcher, no doubt,” said Hawks manager Mark Johnson, who spent parts of eight seasons as a catcher in the major leagues.

....

“As far as physical things that he does behind the plate, he’s a special, special catcher, he really is.”

Johnson said Contreras’ arm strength rates on the scouting scale as an 80 — out of 80.

“He’s got a (Ivan) Pudge Rodriguez arm, basically,” Johnson said.

With as many potential front line major league starters and 94-95 mph flamethrowers on the staff as they supposedly have, it seems like Boise ought to be better than 17-27 in the Northwest League.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 30, 2012, 09:21:36 am
They have a lousy manager
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 30, 2012, 09:38:26 am
Boise will be Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on July 30, 2012, 09:42:08 am
Better than the average P2 post.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on July 30, 2012, 10:03:15 am
How embarrassing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on July 30, 2012, 10:05:02 am
Better than the average P2 post.

Low bar.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 30, 2012, 10:43:27 am
Gioskar!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 30, 2012, 05:37:25 pm
Matt Szczur is 3-3 with a double as the Smokies have an early 5-0 lead over Pensacola in the first game of a DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 30, 2012, 09:12:31 pm
Szczur: 3-4, 2B, CS

Lake: 2-3, 2B, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_30_penaax_tenaax_1


Szczur: 0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_30_penaax_tenaax_2


Francescon: 6-3-0-0-1-6

Torreyes: 2-5, 3B, 2 RBI, SB, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_30_ftmafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 30, 2012, 10:00:03 pm
Vitters: 0-4, K, E

Cabrera: 2-1/3 -0-0-0-0-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_30_iowaaa_nozaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 30, 2012, 10:30:21 pm
Baez: 1-4, 2B, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_30_belafx_peoafx_1


Boise and Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 30, 2012, 10:36:08 pm
Malave: 2-4, 2B, BB, K

Araujo: 5-4-2-2-1-5


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_30_belafx_peoafx_1


Emeterio: 0-3, 2 BB, K, 2 E

Mejias: 5-2/3 -4-3-3-3-7

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_30_dorrok_dcurok_1



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 31, 2012, 10:00:41 am
The Iowa web site lists Casey Coleman as this morning's (11:30) starter yet the game notes say this:

Quote
BULLPEN DAY: The Iowa Cubs will use a committee of pitchers today. The starting rotation will be adjusted after the Chicago Cubs traded starter Paul Maholm in a four-player deal with the Atlanta Braves last night.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 10:10:16 am
Oh goody.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 31, 2012, 10:14:10 am
So where does Vizcaino rank among our pitchers in our system now?

Top 3? Top 5?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 31, 2012, 10:17:37 am
Injured and all, I'd rank him 1.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 31, 2012, 10:17:54 am
I think Vizcaino is pretty clearly the top pitcher in the system.  No one else with any kind of ceiling is in the upper minors.

I suspect that with Jackson's down year, most evaluators would rate Vizcaino behind only Baez, Almora, and Soler right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 10:18:40 am
So where does Vizcaino rank among our pitchers in our system now?

Top 3? Top 5?

Depending on what we hear about Pierce Johnson, Dillon Maples, and Duane Underwood the rest of the season, I'd have to say #1 right now.  Our pitching on the farm is awful.

He's definitely the best pitching prospect among pitchers from Low-A to Triple-A at the very least.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 31, 2012, 10:24:24 am
Agree with JR
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 31, 2012, 10:24:26 am
Keith Law has an Insider piece that starts:

Late Monday night it was announced that the Chicago Cubs had sent left-hander Paul Maholm and outfielder Reed Johnson to the Atlanta Braves for right-handed pitching prospects Arodys Vizcaino and Jaye Chapman.

Atlanta gets marginally better for this year with the additions of Maholm and Johnson, but the Cubs land the best prospect they're likely to obtain in this year's trade market in exchange for two players they didn't need.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 31, 2012, 10:31:18 am
So he's easily one of our top 5 prospects?

Looks like Jed and Theo did well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 31, 2012, 11:25:18 am
Brett Jackson   RF     
Alfredo Amezaga   2B   
James Adduci   LF     
Josh Vitters          1B   
Blake Lalli           C   
Dave Sappelt   CF   
Diory Hernandez   3B   
Matt Tolbert   SS   
Frankie De La Cruz   P
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 03:38:53 pm
Kyle Hendricks Continues To Carve For Rangers

Posted Jul. 26, 2012 12:51 pm by Conor Glassey
Filed under: Daily Dish

Rangers righthander Kyle Hendricks snuck onto the Northwest League top prospect list last fall, coming in at No. 20 after going 2-2, 1.93 with 36 strikeouts and four walks over 33 innings.

Since then, he’s made two changes and he’s again one of the best performers in his league, having spent the entire season with high Class A Myrtle Beach in the Carolina League.

“I changed my mechanics a little bit at the very beginning of the year, trying to get more directional and trying to get everything going towards home plate,” Hendricks said. “And then other than that, I’ve been working with the pitching coach just on pitch sequences, learning the hitters and just watching and learning from the swings they take on certain pitches so that I can make adjustments on the mound as you go and really thinking while you’re out there instead of just throwing.”

He also added a new pitch.

“I just started throwing a cutter and it’s been a big part of the repertoire lately,” Hendricks said. “If I fall behind in the count or something, I use it as a contact pitch to get out of the count and go to the next hitter.”

Hendricks doesn’t overpower with his stuff. His fastball sits in the 87-89 mph range, but he pounds the strike zone and the cutter gives hitters one more thing to think about when it comes to his deep arsenal: He throws a four-seam and two-seam fastball, a changeup, a curveball and a slider.

“I have a pretty good feel for the baseball, so it was actually a pretty easy pitch to learn,” Hendricks said. “And pretty easy to command, which is why I put it into my repertoire so quick. I’ve been pretty pleased with it and Brad (Holman), our pitching coach, has worked with me on it a lot—different grips and stuff like that in the beginning, and I found one that really works for me, so I’m happy with it.”

Thought his first 20 starts and 131 innings this season, Hendricks is 5-8, 2.82 with 112 strikeouts and just 15 walks.

He went to Capistrano Valley High in Mission Viejo, Calif., where he graduated one year ahead of Rockies lefthander Tyler Matzek, before heading to Dartmouth and becoming an eighth-round pick last year.

The last player to be drafted out of Dartmouth and make the big leagues is lefthander Mark Johnson, who spent parts of seven years in the big leagues after being drafted in the 20th round by the Pirates in 1990.

“It’s been a little bit of a learning curve, obviously,” Hendricks said. “But the pitching coaches we’ve had and the managers have been trying to help me out. I’m just trying to learn as I go along and just get better every day, but playing college ball anywhere is a lot different than pro ball. So, any college you’re coming from is going to be a lot different, but it’s been a great time so far.”

As an economics major at an Ivy League school, other players might be tempted to quiz Hendricks on the team’s long bus rides, but he insists he’s just one of the guys.

“I tell them not to even start on that stuff,” Hendricks said with a laugh. “I know they’re thinking about it, but I tell them, ‘I’m not as smart as you think I am. I got in for baseball, don’t worry!’ “
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on July 31, 2012, 04:25:48 pm
Some interesting stats for Christian Villaneuva: he has 24 walks and 20 HBP so far this season. Those stats are eerily similar to Javier Baez's: 9 walks and 10 HBP, in about half as many games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 31, 2012, 05:06:41 pm
Ok now so where does Villanueva and Hendricks rank in our system?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 05:14:04 pm
Well without really thinking too deeply about it, I think an updated Cubs Top 10 could reasonably look something like this . . .

1.  Javier Baez
2.  Albert Almora
3.  Jorge Soler
4.  Matt Szczur
5.  Josh Vitters
6.  Arodys Vizcaino
7.  Brett Jackson
8.  Christian Villanueva
9.  Dan Vogelbach
10.  Welington Castillo

UPDATE: Putting a little more thought into it (but not a whole lot more), here's a rough rundown of the rest of the Top 30 that I can come up with in 15-20 minutes.

11. Pierce Johnson
12. Ronald Torreyes
13. Arismendy Alcantara
14. Jeimer Candelario
15. Jae-Hoon Ha
16. Brooks Raley
17. Duane Underwood
18. Dillon Maples
19. Junior Lake
20. Kyle Hendricks
21. Trey McNutt
22. Gioskar Amaya
23. Ben Wells
24. Shawon Dunston, Jr.
25. Logan Watkins
26. Jacob Brigham
27. Marco Hernandez
28. Dae-Eun Rhee
29. Frank Del Valle
30. Tony Zych
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 31, 2012, 05:44:29 pm
I wouldn't rate Villanueva nearly that high.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 31, 2012, 05:45:02 pm
After all is said and done, we're still astonishingly weak in terms of pitching.  They better hope Paniagua pans out this time, because the cupboard is pretty bare.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 31, 2012, 05:48:57 pm
Baseball America says Villanueva ia a damn fine player.

They make Hendricks out to be pretty good too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 05:49:14 pm
Keith Law:

The Cubs' leverage to move Dempster was limited by his 10-and-5 rights, allowing him to veto any potential trade, and his impending free agency, so acquiring a solid prospect in Villanueva is a reasonable return. A third baseman, Villanueva was hopelessly blocked in the Rangers' organization, where Mike Olt can't even find a place to play because of Adrian Beltre, but he does have major league potential as a plus defender with doubles power. He's a below-average runner and is not patient, which means he'll fit right in with most of the Cubs' other offensive prospects. He turned 21 in June and put up a .285/.356/.421 line this year for high Class A Myrtle Beach, which has one of the toughest parks for hitters in the minors.

Hendricks is more of an organizational starter, 87-89 mph with an average cutter and changeup and below-average curveball but good command and a repeatable delivery and arm action. The right-hander could surface as a fifth starter, but his stuff is probably too fringy for that.


The Cubs' haul from the trades of Dempster, Paul Maholm, Reed Johnson and Geovany Soto over the past few days netted one major prospect in Arodys Vizcaino, who once healthy will be the best pitching prospect in their system, as well as a solid quantity of organizational prospect depth. They also still have Matt Garza, a valuable trade asset because he's both effective and under control for 2013, and who should return at least one above-average prospect in a trade this offseason.

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/blog/_/name/law_keith (http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/blog/_/name/law_keith)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 05:51:10 pm
Christian Villanueva, 3b
 Age: 21. Born: Jun 19, 1991 in Guadalajara, Mexico.
 Ht.: 5-11. Wt.: 160.
 Bats: R. Throws: R.
 Career Transactions: Signed as nondrafted free agent by Rangers, Aug. 17, 2008.
 
 
Club (League)
Class
AVG
G
AB
R
H
2B
3B
HR
RBI
BB
SO
SB
OBP
SLG
Myrtle Beach (CAR)
HiA
.285
100
375
45
107
19
1
10
59
24
83
9
.356
.421
The Rangers are loaded at third base with Adrian Beltre in the majors and stud prospect Mike Olt in the minors, which made the well-regarded Villanueva expendable. Signed out of Mexico, he ranked No. 100 on our Top 100 Prospects list entering the season. Villanueva has a broad base of tools that include a solid bat, potential average power, fringe to average speed with good instincts on the bases and standout defense with soft hands and a strong arm at third base. He's just 21 and in high Class A, so he still needs time to develop. He'll have to tighten his strike zone, and some scouts question if he'll grow into enough power to be a big league regular at third base.
 
Kyle Hendricks, rhp
 Age: 22. Born: Dec 7, 1989 in San Juan Capistrano, Calif.
 Ht.: 6-2. Wt.: 165.
 Bats: R. Throws: R.
 School: Dartmouth.
 Career Transactions: Selected by Rangers in eighth round of 2011 draft; signed June 10, 2011.
 
 
Club (League)
Class
W
L
ERA
G
GS
SV
IP
H
R
ER
HR
BB
SO
WHIP
Myrtle Beach (CAR)
HiA
5
8
2.82
20
20
0
131
123
49
41
8
15
112
1.06
Hendricks has had a fine season with Myrtle Beach, as detailed in a recent BA Prospects Blog post (http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/07/kyle-hendricks/). He throws an upper-80s two-seam fastball, a four-seamer that bumps 92 mph and mid-80s cutter to go with a curveball, slider and changeup. None of the pitches grades as plus, but he has feel for his craft and for the strike zone. He ranked second in the Carolina League in ERA, WHIP and innings as well as third in strikeouts, while leading the league in walk ratio (1.0 per nine innings). At a listed 6-foot-2, 165 pounds, he has room to get bigger and stronger.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 31, 2012, 05:56:06 pm
Quote
Hendricks is more of an organizational starter, 87-89 mph with an average cutter and changeup and below-average curveball but good command and a repeatable delivery and arm action. The right-hander could surface as a fifth starter, but his stuff is probably too fringy for that.


Pretty much says it all, really.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2012, 06:00:12 pm
Jackson: 1-4, 2B, RBI, SB, BB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_31_iowaaa_nozaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 31, 2012, 06:01:45 pm
Peoria Chiefs ‏@peoriachiefs
Heading into our final game in July. Baez Leads MWL in Slug for month at .686, 3rd Avg .363, 2nd XBH 18, 3rd HR 8, 2nd Hits 38, T7 RBI 20
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on July 31, 2012, 06:04:33 pm
I wonder if after a Camp Colvin or two, a 190 lb Hendricks could add 2-3 mph to his fastball.  165 lbs at 6'2" is awfully skinny.  Not as bad as the 130lbs I was out of high school at that height, but still.....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 31, 2012, 06:23:05 pm
I've read a couple good reports on Villanueva, sounds better than I initially gave him credit for.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on July 31, 2012, 07:05:16 pm
Boise Hawks Radio ‏@BoiseHawksRadio
Roster Moves Today - RHP Tyler Bremer (Baylor U.) and LHP Nathan Dorris (Southern Illinois) promoted from Mesa Cubs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2012, 09:01:22 pm
Torreyes: 2-5, 2B, 2 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_31_ftmafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 09:24:29 pm
Quote from: Baseball America
. . . and some scouts question if he'll grow into enough power to be a big league regular at third base.

One thing I'm starting to not understand is why statements like this get made about third base prospects today.  Third base isn't the big time power source it used to be.  If you hit .280 with 15 homers and play above average defense, you're a very good major league third baseman.

I'd also say if some people are comparing him to Vinny Castilla, that's plenty enough power for third base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: EightyTwo on July 31, 2012, 09:26:10 pm
Vinny Castilla.  Now there's a name I had all but forgotten about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2012, 09:41:47 pm
Baez: 2-4, 2 K

Jensen: 5-3-2-2-2-6


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_31_peoafx_qcsafx_1


Tennessee suspended.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 31, 2012, 09:51:52 pm
Other than that "some people are comparing him to Vinny Castilla" quote, has there been a confirmation of anyone actually comparing Villanueva to Vinny Castilla?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2012, 10:04:09 pm
Je Baez: 2-3, 3B, 3 RBI, 2 SB, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_31_dcurok_dorrok_1


Santana: 5-0-0-0-2-3

Malave: 1-4, 2 BB, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_31_dmerok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 10:13:34 pm
Other than that "some people are comparing him to Vinny Castilla" quote, has there been a confirmation of anyone actually comparing Villanueva to Vinny Castilla?

From the BA Rangers Top 10:

Quote
Background:  Rangers international scouting director Mike Daly saw Villanueva star for Mexico at the 2008 Junior World Championships, and Texas signed him two weeks later. Coming from a family of baseball players, he always played shortstop as an amateur but moved to third base after injuring his knee in 2009 and starting to fill out.

Scouting Report:  Villanueva has a short, compact swing with a balanced load and good bat control. He has an advanced approach at the plate, though he can get pull-happy at times. There are mixed opinions on his power, as he presently has line-drive sock but some scouts see at least average potential. He doesn't project as a basestealer, but he has sneaky quickness and instincts that allowed him to swipe 32 bases last year. Villanueva is equally as impressive at third base as Mike Olt. A plus defender, Villanueva has soft hands and easy actions. Despite average speed, he has a solid range thanks to his first-step quickness and instincts. He has above-average arm with good carry and accuracy.

The Future:  Scouts compare Villanueva with countryman Vinny Castilla. With Adrian Beltre in Texas and Olt ahead of him in the system, Villanueva spent time during instructional league at second base, where there would be reduced pressure on his bat. He'll play in high Class A in 2012.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 10:24:20 pm
BA ranks the Top 10 prospects traded:

1. Jacob Turner, rhp, Marlins. Detroit gave Turner a $4.7 million contract as the No. 9 overall pick in 2009, then gave him just six big league starts over two seasons before sending him, catcher Rob Brantly, lefthander Brian Flynn to the Marlins for Anibal Sanchez, Omar Infante and a swap of competitive-balance lottery picks. Turner hasn't hit 93-95 mph as often or missed as many bats this year as he had in the past, leading to concern that he's headed down the same path Rick Porcello took with the Tigers. He throws strikes and shows the makings of three possible plus pitches, so there's still hope he can become a No. 2 starter.
 
 2. Jean Segura, ss, Brewers. Milwaukee hopes that Segura, the headliner in the Zack Greinke trade with the Angels, can fill the shortstop void created when it sent Alcides Escobar to the Royals to get Greinke in December 2010. Segura isn't especially rangy at shortstop but gets the job done, and he has plenty of offensive upside with his average power and plus speed.
 
 3. Arodys Vizcaino, rhp, Cubs. Chicago has very little advanced young pitching, so it was willing to take the sidelined Vizcaino and throw-in Jaye Chapman from the Braves in exchange for Paul Maholm and Reed Johnson. Considered untouchable a year ago, Vizcaino had a mid-90s fastball and sharp curveball before blowing out his elbow this spring. If he's not durable enough to start, he has the stuff to close.
 
 4. Tommy Joseph, c, Phillies. After giving up three quality youngsters (Jonathan Singleton, Jarred Cosart, Domingo Santana) to get Hunter Pence from the Astros last July, the Phillies got just one back (Joseph, along with Nate Schierholtz and righthander Seth Rosin) when they spun Pence to San Francisco. One of the game's top catching prospects, Joseph has power to all fields and has cleaned up his defense in three years as a pro.
 
 5. Christian Villanueva, 3b, Cubs. For Ryan Dempster, Chicago got Villanueva and righthander Kyle Hendricks from the Rangers. Stuck behind Adrian Beltre and Mike Olt in Texas, Villanueva has a broad base of tools: solid bat, potential average power, average baserunning, soft hands, strong arm.
 
 6. Rob Brantly, c, Marlins. Though Brantly doesn't have a tool that jumps out and was blocked by Alex Avila in Detroit, he can start behind the plate in the major leagues. With his line-drive bat and average catch-and-throw skills, he could take over in Miami at some point in 2013.
 
 7. Johnny Hellweg, rhp, Brewers. Hellweg intimidates hitters with his 6-foot-9 frame, 94-96 mph fastball and hard curveball. He's still figuring out how to repeat his delivery and control his pitches, and his ability to do so will determine whether his future is in the rotation or bullpen.
 
 8. Ethan Martin, rhp, Phillies. The first high school pitcher drafted (15th overall) in 2008, Martin looked like a lost cause while posting a 6.68 ERA in high Class A in 2010-11. He has looked like a different pitcher since moving to Double-A last June, working at 92-97 mph and throwing more strikes, though he's probably destined for the bullpen. Philadelphia picked up him and Josh Lindblom for Shane Victorino.
 
 9. Ariel Pena, rhp, Brewers. The third piece of the Greinke package, Pena is better than he showed during a horrific Futures Game appearance (eight runs in one-third of an inning). He has a low-90s fastball, hard slider and average command, and he may have a better chance to start than Hellweg.
 
 10. Zack Cox, 3b, Marlins. The Cardinals gave Cox a $3.2 million contract after taking him 25th overall in 2010, when scouts considered him the best pure hitter in the draft. David Freese's emergence and Cox' horrible start this year in Triple-A led St. Louis to give him away for Edward Mujica. Though Cox has lost some luster, he still has the short stroke, bat-on-ball skills and strength to hit for a solid average and at least average power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 31, 2012, 10:28:01 pm
Kevin Goldstein just tweeted that he has submitted a ranking of all 43 prospects traded in July to both ESPN and BP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 31, 2012, 10:40:40 pm
Well JR, I'll take that as a "no" because that's exactly the generic quote I was talking about.  Until someone can offer a name or any specific element in Villanueva's skill set that merits the comparison, it's just meaningless hearsay.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 10:43:00 pm
Well JR, I'll take that as a "no" because that's exactly the generic quote I was talking about.  Until someone can offer a name or any specific element in Villanueva's skill set that merits the comparison, it's just meaningless hearsay.

Sheesh.  When scouts compare him to Vinny Castilla, I think that pretty well means they think his skill set is comparable to Vinny Castilla's. They're not just looking at what he's doing now at 21 but what he could be when he's 25 or 26.

In Castilla's case, he wasn't even at Villanueva's level as a hitter when he was coming up through the minors.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=castil001vin
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 31, 2012, 10:54:23 pm
Did the Tigers get the pick upgrade? Or the fish?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on July 31, 2012, 10:54:35 pm
There was a discussion at NSBB this afternoon about which prospect would rank higher -- Vitters or Villanueva?

I'm curious as to what the response would be here.

Personally, I'd rate Vitters higher due to being closer to the Majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on July 31, 2012, 10:55:52 pm
Wasn't Castilla mainly a creation of Coors/Mile High?  Seems like he pretty much sucked for the rest of his career.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 31, 2012, 10:56:06 pm
Cause Turner is a hell of a get for a rental pitcher and an avg utility guy, unless the Tigers are getting back the upgraded pick, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on July 31, 2012, 10:57:12 pm
I'd rate Villanueva higher then Vitters due to his likely above avg defense at 3b. Vitters may not stick at third, and if he does, it will be painful. His bat doesn't start anywhere but 3rd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 10:58:36 pm
Wasn't Castilla mainly a creation of Coors/Mile High?  Seems like he pretty much sucked for the rest of his career.

He had a couple of decent years with Houston and Atlanta after leaving Coors.

Have to admit, though, I kind of wonder if there might have been some performance enhancement going on there with him too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on July 31, 2012, 11:07:06 pm
Personally, I'd rate Vitters higher due to being closer to the Majors.

I'd rate Vitters higher too for the same reason. 

He definitely doesn't have Villanueva's glove, though. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2012, 11:22:25 pm
Candelario: 3-4, 2B, SF, 3 RBI  (game-winning RBI double in 9th)

Vogelbach: 1-4, HR, 3 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_31_spoasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 31, 2012, 11:32:42 pm
Jonathan Mayo said on the MLB Network that Arodys Vizcaino is our #3 prospect.

Damn that seems high.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 31, 2012, 11:37:42 pm
Sounds about right to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on July 31, 2012, 11:42:01 pm
Ahead of who?

Baez,Soler,or Almora?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on July 31, 2012, 11:49:44 pm
Almora is a draftee who's played a week of Rookie League ball.  He's a guy with great work ethic and less-than-great tools.  It's certainly no stretch to say a pitcher with dominant stuff who's already pitched in the majors is ahead of him.  Maybe Almora will be great, maybe Vizcaino will never be the same - we can't know until it happens, only guess.  That's why we call them "prospects".

The only reason I'd probably rate Soler ahead of Vizcaino is because he does have great tools.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on July 31, 2012, 11:53:52 pm
Almora left tonight's game in the 3rd inning.

Soler: 0-5, RBI, SB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_31_royrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 01, 2012, 12:07:05 am
Almora left tonight's game in the 3rd inning.


Now watch the trade rumors begin.  :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 01, 2012, 12:35:36 am
First try on the current top 20 prospects.  Absolute wildass guesses on Paniagua, Underwood, Blackburn and Johnson

1   Baez
2   Soler
3   Vizcaino
4   Almora
5   Vogelbach
6   Jackson
7   Vitters
8   Szcur
9   Villaneuva
10   Candelario
11   Lake
12   Hendricks
13   Cabrera
14   Brigham
15   Paniagua
16   Torreyes
17   Burke
18   Geiger
19   Alcantara
20   Kirk
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 01, 2012, 12:54:07 am
Hendricks isn't going to be in many top 20's, never mind top 12s.  His stuff is fringy at best - the kid of guy that typically hits the wall at AAA.  He was barely in Texas' top 50 coming into the season for that reason.

Paniagua is a guy who's probably going to end up a lot more highly ranked than most people think going into next season - likely the top 10.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 01, 2012, 12:54:26 am
Almora left tonight's game in the 3rd inning.

UPDATE: Was told that Albert Almora pulled his groin (h/t @brandondmilla).  No word on how serious, however.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 01, 2012, 01:02:36 am
After reading more and more on Villanueva, I'm ready to say he's a much better return than Gould would have been. He's no Delgado, but a very good return for Demp. Well done, Hoyerstein.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 01, 2012, 01:33:58 am
First try on the current top 20 prospects.  Absolute wildass guesses on Paniagua, Underwood, Blackburn and Johnson

So your wildass guess is that Underwood, Blackburn and Johnson, along with Maples and Whitenack, aren't top-20 worthy?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 01, 2012, 01:42:44 am
FWIW, this is from AP story on tonight's game:

Along with Coleman, the Cubs also recalled Cardenas and C Welington Castillo from Triple-A Iowa before the game. ... GM Jed Hoyer said it might not be long before Josh Vitters is called up from Triple-A. He was batting .298 with 15 homers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2012, 02:01:12 am
Boise highlights:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFphZksaAvc&feature=plcp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 01, 2012, 06:28:18 am
Kevin Goldstein has a midseason top 50 up at BP today.  No write-ups on anyone, just the list.  Baez is #15, and Soler is #24.  This year's draftees are not included, and players needed to still be in the minors on July 1.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=17781
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 01, 2012, 07:38:30 am
Vizcaino had quite a season in 2011, when he was 20 all season long.  He started in high A, after less that 14 innings there the year before, then quickly moved thru AA and AAA to reach Atlanta by August 10th, called up to bolster the staff in a pennant race, and not just as a September reward for a nice season.

It will be nice to see what he can do next year. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 01, 2012, 07:43:25 am
FWIW, this is from AP story on tonight's game:

Along with Coleman, the Cubs also recalled Cardenas and C Welington Castillo from Triple-A Iowa before the game. ... GM Jed Hoyer said it might not be long before Josh Vitters is called up from Triple-A. He was batting .298 with 15 homers.

That surprises me a bit.  On the one hand, Valbuena obviously isn't even a short-term answer, offensively.  However, if the Cubs take Vitters seriously as a prospect, this would seem to go against what they've said about promotions (re Rizzo and Jackson).  Vitters' offense might make him worth a look at the major leagues, but from everything I've read his defense is inadequate.  Beyond that, Hoyer has repeatedly said they want their prospects to have a full year at AAA before bringing them up.  Maybe Hoyer meant a September call-up?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 01, 2012, 07:51:37 am
He could easily have meant that, and you will note there is no direct quote.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 01, 2012, 08:18:12 am
The one thing I'd caution about ranking Vizcaino as high as third is his injury history.  It is very significant, and as Angel Guzman showed, you can have all of the talent in the world but it doesn't mean much if you can't stay on the field. 

I guess that's why I'm a little more cautious in rating him right now.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 01, 2012, 08:20:17 am
Though the article below is more than a year old now, I don't recall ever seeing it before, and it has some interesting points, which I have highlighted:

http://www.csnchicago.com/03/29/11/Cubs-trying-to-build-a-global-empire/landing_insider_mooney_loud3r.html?blockID=493375
Cubs trying to build a global empire
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Posted 8:00 p.m. | Updated 8:35 p.m.
By Patrick Mooney
CSNChicago.com

MESA, Ariz. – Not that long ago, Oneri Fleita’s territory included Georgia and the Florida Panhandle – and all of Latin America. This was the late 1990s and Venezuela and the Dominican Republic basically fell to an area scout running a one-man operation.

“There was nothing,” Fleita recalled. “We were starting in Latin America from ground zero.”

Here’s how far the Cubs – and Fleita – have traveled: The vice president of player personnel now has around 20 scouts covering 25 different countries, all hoping to find the next big thing.

Fleita’s portfolio includes the minor-league system and international operations. He’s at the center of everything the Cubs are trying to do under chairman Tom Ricketts and a new ownership group. Soon they will break ground on a new complex in Arizona, and build a new academy in the Dominican Republic.

Sources insist that the overall budget for baseball operations remains the same in 2011. Major-league payroll has been slashed by about 10 percent, with more funds pumped into player development.

Fleita’s job is to keep the pipeline flowing with talent and produce more Starlin Castros and Carlos Marmols.

Within the past few years, the Cubs have added a director of international scouting, Paul Weaver, who reports to Fleita. They also hired special assistant Louis Eljaua, the point man who helped the Red Sox and Pirates build facilities in the Dominican Republic.

Fleita has fair skin and blue eyes, but he’s of Cuban descent. He grew up in Key West, Fla., some 90 miles from Cuba. As a kid, he spoke Spanish and went by his given name –David.

Future Cubs general manager Jim Hendry recruited Fleita to play for him at Creighton University. Between his junior and senior years of college, Fleita returned home to Florida to visit his grandfather, who was on a deathbed with terminal cancer.

The Cuban immigrant had always wanted his grandson to be Oneri Fleita III. So Fleita changed his name to honor his grandfather, who wound up living for several more years.

“He was so happy and so appreciative,” Fleita said. “(But) then I got to live with this name the rest of my life.”

Lost in translation

Fleita smiles and laughs often while talking about his past, perhaps because it was so important to his future.

Fleita signed with the Orioles and went to his first spring training in 1989. He surveyed the room and saw all these young Latin players who didn’t speak a word of English.

There were no official translators, so Fleita would grab them in the corner and try to explain what was going on. His language abilities – if not his overall skill set – drew the attention of Oriole officials like Roland Hemond, Doug Melvin and Jerry Narron.

“They kind of looked around and said, ‘Hey, you really can’t play, but you do have a tool. We’ll make you a coach and you can help us out,’” Fleita recalled. “That opened the door for me.”

By 1995 Fleita had jumped to the Cubs and began to work his way up the organizational ladder. Once he started to oversee the farm system, he went to then-president Andy MacPhail with one request: “Do I have permission to send my coaches to Latin America?”

“I had sat in enough meetings behind closed doors and heard guys use the word ‘stupid’ or ‘un-coachable,’” Fleita said. “That bothered me because I thought if you had the opportunity to go and see where these guys grew up – and understood their backgrounds and who they are – you might become a better teacher (and) think of a different way to (reach) that person.”


To broaden their horizons, Fleita had every one of his coaches visit the team’s academy in the Dominican Republic during a three-year window. What might be normal in that culture – walking out to your position – is completely unacceptable here and there’s value in knowing that difference.

“You can’t build an organization like you think you’re going to build a new neighborhood,” Fleita said, “and have cookie-cutter homes (with) the same dimensions and (floor plans). You have to learn to work with them individually.”

Father Fleita

The Ricketts family views Fleita as a father figure to all the prospects in the Dominican Republic.

Fleita lives with his wife and three children in the northern suburbs, not far from O’Hare, and there have been many winters where he’s picked up Latin players at the airport and driven them to Northwestern Memorial. Who else is going to talk to their doctors and sit in the hospital’s waiting room?

Though Fleita has a compassionate side and an advanced worldview, he knows that he doesn’t have a job without the 25 guys in the Wrigley Field dugout. He understands that the Cubs have to win now.

“We’re all living what takes place at the major-league level, no matter where we’re at in this organization,” Fleita said. “We’re going to sink and swim together. You can’t forget that. You can’t lose sight of that.”

Baseball America recently completed its audits and ranked the Cubs system at No. 16. It’s a drop from the industry’s top tier in 2010, the cost of obtaining Matt Garza from Tampa Bay.

That’s exactly why Fleita does this. These departments aren’t waiting around to see what shortstop Hak-Ju Lee and pitcher Chris Archer might look like in 2015. They created an asset by converting Robinson Chirinos to catcher. They evaluated outfielders Brandon Guyer and Sam Fuld as expendable.

The bottom line is that the Cubs needed a frontline starter to account for 200 innings this season and beyond.

The next collective bargaining agreement could regulate the amateur draft and the international market. In theory those changes might limit the financial resources the Cubs can pour into player development. But it’s not like those budgets were unlimited or consistent under the Tribune Co.

Fleita knows that his staffers are constantly telling players that they have to make adjustments. Why should management be any different? In this business, you always have to be creative and flexible.

One reason why Fleita believes he’s been successful in converting players to different positions – Marmol, Randy Wells, Geovany Soto – is because everyone in the Dominican Republic wants to be the shortstop. You need vision just to field a team, and then see what they can become.

Fleita understands that part of this job is crazy, standing on a field in a foreign country and handing out bonuses to teenagers like it’s Monopoly money. But what really matters is that the Cubs are finally in the global game.

“We’re everywhere now,” Fleita said. “We’re in a perfect position.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 01, 2012, 08:59:04 am
So your wildass guess is that Underwood, Blackburn and Johnson, along with Maples and Whitenack, aren't top-20 worthy?

My absolute guess is that I have almost no information to base the rating on, other than the amount of money they were paid.  Last year, I rated Dunston Jr. quite highly based upon little more than his signing bonus, and was criticized for it, not without reason.  It is difficult, and probably quite meaningless, to decide where to place Maples, for instance, who has been signed for almost a year and has pitched only one inning.  And to compare him to 20 guys, many of which have a track record.  I am sure that, by the time we have the information from the Arizona Fall games and the winter leagues, very few will still be in the same position.

Personally, I think it is more likely that Hendricks moves up on the scale, rather than down.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: BullingersEars on August 01, 2012, 09:00:53 am
On the trade deadline special, Jonathan Mayo said he thought Vizcaini wa our number three prospect behind Brett Jackson and " maybe Javy Baez".  Hmm.....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 01, 2012, 09:16:37 am
Cubs Den

Roni Torreyes had a couple more hits with 2 RBI.  He is now hitting .330 in his last 49 games and .267 overall with a .327 OBP.  Hard to believe this kid is 19 years old and has been tearing up one of the toughest pitching leagues for 2 straight months.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 01, 2012, 09:24:28 am
Yeah I saw the Bully.  Anyone who rates Jackson in our top two has pretty much lost all credibility.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 01, 2012, 09:40:21 am
Good to see Josh Vitters is about to get a chance.

They'd just as well call up Brett Jackson too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 01, 2012, 12:38:58 pm
Quote from: Sahadev Sharma ‏@sahadevsharma
And the news you've all been waiting for (drum roll please) The reason Gerardo Concepcion hasn't been pitching lately is because he has mono

Mono, the new career killer!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 01, 2012, 01:00:44 pm
He needs to get surround sound.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 01, 2012, 01:14:33 pm
Now you are forcing it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 01, 2012, 01:17:53 pm
I just throw the sh*t and see what sticks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 01, 2012, 01:51:46 pm
Kevin Goldstein ranks all 43 minor leaguers traded in July.  Here are the most significant write-ups for the Cubs:

Quote
3. Arodys Vizcaino, RHP, Cubs (from Braves)

Scouting Profile: A 21 year-old Dominican who dominated at times last year out of the big league bullpen. Tommy John surgery in spring, back for spring 2013. Undersized, with violent delivery, but stuff plays up out of the bullpen with a fastball that sits at 96 and touches 98, as well as a plus power breaking ball. Closer potential.

Path With New Club: The Cubs have plenty of room for their prospects, and once fully healthy and rehabbed, Vizcaino could assume a role in the back of the Cubs bullpen as a closer-in-training while Carlos Marmol plays out the last year of his contract.

8. Christian Villanueva, 3B, Cubs (from Rangers)

Scouting Profile: A 21-year-old whose greatest strength is a lack of weaknesses. Sound approach with good bat speed and the potential for average power once he fills out. Plus defender with plus arm and athletic with at least average speed. Projects as a solid, average starting third baseman with some chance at a higher ceiling.

15. Jacob Brigham, RHP, Cubs (from Texas)
Slow-to-develop starter has back-end starting potential with good command of low 90s fastball and solid breaking ball.

Kyle Hendricks is rated #36, while Jaye Chapman is rated #39.

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/8221634/ranking-jacob-turner-arodys-vizcaino-other-top-prospects-traded-deadline-mlb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 01, 2012, 02:23:07 pm
Keith Law and Kevin Goldstein podcast about prospects:

http://espn.go.com/espnradio/play?id=8222549

The first half is about deadline prospects.  The second half (starting around 20 minutes) talks about other prospects, including Jackson and Baez.  They both really, REALLY like Baez, including this quote from Goldstein: "The bat is nutsy, crazy good."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 01, 2012, 02:38:31 pm
Mike (Denver): Hi Jim. What are your thoughts on the return for Ryan Dempster (specifically Christian Villaneuva)? Where would he and Arodys Vizcaino fall in the Cubs Top 10 prospects? Thanks.


Jim Callis: Getting Randall Delgado from the Braves for Dempster would have been better, but I like Villanueva. He's a very toolsy third baseman. I think both he and Vizcaino would fit in the 5-7 range on a Cubs Top 10.

Big Dave (AR):
Jacob Brigham...is he a guy that can be a K per inning starter at the big league level?

Jim Callis: I don't see it. He's not quite doing that in Double-A this year and I think he profiles more as a reliever in the majors. He has average stuff now, though he touched some 97s a couple of years ago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 01, 2012, 02:41:19 pm
Dave (DC): Who would you rather have if you were the Cubs, the higher ceiling, but risky Vizcaino, or the lower ceiling but Major League Ready Delgado?

Jim Callis: Delgado, because of the better health and better chance to be a starter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 01, 2012, 02:46:06 pm
Pretty sensible and spot-on analysis from Callis.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 01, 2012, 05:47:59 pm
Cubs Den

Roni Torreyes had a couple more hits with 2 RBI.  He is now hitting .330 in his last 49 games and .267 overall with a .327 OBP.  Hard to believe this kid is 19 years old and has been tearing up one of the toughest pitching leagues for 2 straight months.

With July completed, here is Torreyes slash line month by month this season:

April  230-306-324

May 137-190-192

June 330-400-523

July  333-378-471.

As was discussed back then, Torreyes' May was kind of amazing.  73 ABs for the month---with only one K.  But BABIP somehow was an unbelievable .127.

As Dave notes, last two months pretty impressive for a guy in Fast-A who does not turn 20 until September.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2012, 06:42:59 pm
Baez: 2-5, 2B, RBI, K

Geiger: 3-5, 2B, 2 HR, 8 RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_01_peoafx_qcsafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 01, 2012, 08:18:55 pm
Almora's groin strain must not be too bad.  He started today, and is 2 singles in 2 at bats so far today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 01, 2012, 08:24:28 pm
Looks like they are trying to make Lendy Castillo a starter.  Moved up to Daytona, he went 4 innings, 3 hits, 1 run, 0 earned runs.

Pierce Johnson sighting.  one inning.  2 hits but no run s.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 01, 2012, 08:30:16 pm
Best case scenario-- How will Javy Baez progress through the Cubs system ? Half of next year in Daytona, then half a year in Double A, then start 2014 in Iowa and jump to the Cubs in June like Rizzo did this year ?

Or is that way too optimistic ?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 01, 2012, 08:31:43 pm
Torreyes with a couple more hits and a walk.  He's having a real duel between walks and K's, walks takes the lead by 1.  I think he's left the .700-OPS mark behind him. 

Szczur has struggled thus far at AA.  2 K's and hitless in the opener, hitting .222. 

Pierce Johnson makes his pro debut, escapes the first with a couple of singles.  Carlos Martinez at the moment has his rookie-league ERA down below 1. 

Almora's first multihit game as a pro, bumps his BA/OBP up to .240.  For the moment, he's the batting champion of the three top-pick HS outfielders.  He's at .240, Correa is up to .215 now, and Buxton is at .203.  Even the lowest of pro pitching is a whole lot harder than HS pitching, and a whole lot tougher than the Dale Sveum-type arms that throw when you're trying out for a team pre-draft. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2012, 08:48:17 pm
Torreyes: 2-3, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_01_ftmafa_dbcafa_1


Rhee: 4-3-1-1-0-2

McNutt: 3-2-1-1-1-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_31_penaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 01, 2012, 08:59:50 pm
I hate saying it about someone in Single-A, but Torreyes is looking like a safe bet to have a meaningful major league career.  I probably underrated him when I did my 15-20 minute Top 30 list.

One thing you have to say about the Theocracy is they've done a good job adding talent to our minor league system so far.  The Marshall, Maholm, and even the Dempster trades have all added some good players that we desperately needed in our minor leagues.  Soler was also obviously a big time pickup for us.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 01, 2012, 09:01:33 pm
But they should have known that Concepcion would come down with mono.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 01, 2012, 09:03:03 pm
Just looking at my quickie Top 12, half of them are guys who were brought in under the new regime - Almora, Soler, Vizcaino, Villenueva, P. Johnson, and Torreyes. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 01, 2012, 09:03:07 pm
After seeing all this talk of Roni Torreyes I had to check him out and see what all the fuss was about.

I didnt see it.

Give me Zeke Devoss over him all day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 01, 2012, 09:05:50 pm
Torreyes is the little hit tool that could. Love that kid.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 01, 2012, 09:08:37 pm
Zeke DeVoss over Torreyes?  You better check again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 01, 2012, 09:12:08 pm
Gioskar Amaya maybe but Torreyes numbers are pretty amazing when he is healthy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 01, 2012, 09:14:03 pm
Well DeVoss is bigger than Torreyes.  No confirmation on whether he's "bigger" yet, but Jigs might already be making that assumption.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 01, 2012, 10:19:49 pm
After seeing all this talk of Roni Torreyes I had to check him out and see what all the fuss was about.

I didnt see it.

Give me Zeke Devoss over him all day.

jiggs, Torreyes is two years younger than Devoss, Devoss is playing at a lower level than Torreyes is at right now (high A compared to low A), and without adjusting for the higher league level, or the age difference, or the fact that Torreyes had a hand or wrist injury the first two months of the season causing his performance then to be terrible, Torreyes is putting up much better numbers for the full season: .271/.332/.394/.727 for Torreyes and .232/.369/.342/.711 for Devoss.

And in the last two months, after getting over his injury, Torreyes has hit .331/.394/.507/.901.

The comparison isn't even close.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: EightyTwo on August 01, 2012, 10:32:00 pm
Consider the source....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2012, 10:32:21 pm
Jackson: 3-5, 2B, 3B, K, E

Vitters: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_01_cspaaa_iowaaa_1


Bour: GW-ING HR in 7th,  1-2, HR, RBI, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_01_penaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 01, 2012, 10:40:50 pm
I looked at his numbers and I dont see it.

At all.

They're just prospects and we wont know for at least a few more years but we'll just have to wait and see.

Your opinions are no better than mine and if we were that good at projecting these cats we wouldnt just be talking about it on a message board.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 01, 2012, 10:46:07 pm
It's gonna be hard not to bring Adduci up in September given his offensive production at Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 01, 2012, 11:38:16 pm
Vogelbach: 2-5, 2B, 2 K

Candelario: 2-5, 2B, 3 RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_01_spoasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2012, 12:14:48 am
Je Baez: 2-3, 2B, BB, K, CS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_01_dcurok_ddirok_1


Torrez: 6-3-1-1-0-2

Acosta: 2-4, RBI, BB, K, CS, E

Malave: 2-5, RBI, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_01_dyarok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 02, 2012, 12:17:41 am
Daytona 

Minor League umpire ejects sound guy for playing Three Blind Mice after questionable call


(http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17uoh5ccvaom8png/xlarge.png)

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120801&content_id=35977786&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb

http://offthebench.nbcsports.com/2012/08/01/minor-league-umpire-ejects-sound-guy-for-playing-three-blind-mice-after-questionable-call/ (http://offthebench.nbcsports.com/2012/08/01/minor-league-umpire-ejects-sound-guy-for-playing-three-blind-mice-after-questionable-call/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2012, 12:43:27 am
Almora: 3-4, SB

Soler: 2-4, 2 SB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_01_cubrok_clerok_1


Almora: 0-3, K

Soler: 0-2, 2 BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_01_cubrok_clerok_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 02, 2012, 12:51:34 am
ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @billazbbphotog Jorge Soler with a steal of home for AZL #Cubs. Pitcher tried a pick off to 1st and Soler took off from 3rd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2012, 03:01:57 am
Quote
But, with Buckner’s help, Amaya has transformed himself at the plate. He said he used to struggle with inside pitches, but now he doesn’t mind seeing a pitcher come inside.

“It’s good now,” he said. “I’ve done a lot of work with (Buckner) on pitches inside, and now I can swing at inside pitches with some power.”

“He was hitting a few too many balls to right field,” Buckner said. “So we said, ‘Hey, if the ball’s inside, you’ve got to pull it.’ Then he hit the ball out of the park a couple of times and kind of liked that.”


http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/08/02/2212864/young-hawk-showing-promise-and.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2012, 03:08:54 am
Quote
Daytona added right-handed pitcher Kyle Hendricks and infielder Christian Villanueva to the roster. Both were acquired from the Texas Rangers in exchange for Chicago Cubs right-handed pitcher Ryan Dempster. Daytona also added infielder Vladimir Frias, which the organization acquired from the Gateway Grizzlies of the independent Frontier League. Meanwhile, Daytona infielder Matt Cerda was promoted to Double-A Tennessee, which sent infielder Dustin Harrington to Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 02, 2012, 08:49:44 am
Boise Highlights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkz4AlsdSMo&feature=player_detailpage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkz4AlsdSMo&feature=player_detailpage)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 02, 2012, 09:45:31 am
I looked at his numbers and I dont see it.

At all.

What is the "it" that you don't see?

Is there anything you dispute in what I posted"

jiggs, Devoss is two years older than Torreyes, is playing at a lower level than Torreyes is at right now (high A compared to low A), and without adjusting for the higher league level, or the age difference, or the fact that Torreyes had a hand or wrist injury the first two months of the season causing his performance then to be terrible, Torreyes is putting up much better numbers for the full season: .271/.332/.394/.727 for Torreyes and .232/.369/.342/.711 for Devoss.

And in the last two months, after getting over his injury, Torreyes has hit .331/.394/.507/.901.


Do you believe that low A, where Devoss is at, is actually more difficult than high A, where Torreyes is, and that Devoss is likely actually facing better pitching?

Do you believe that players who are 20, as Torreyes is, generally should be out-hitting players who are 22, as Devoss is, so the stat lines don't mean anything?

Or do you believe that .232/.369/.342/.711 is a better and more impressive stat line than .271/.332/.394/.727?

Or do you believe that Torreyes' hitting numbers right now are artificially inflated as a result of having the hand injury earlier this season, and that in the months ahead he is likely to regress to what he was doing when he was injured, thinking that the two month period after an injury heals is a period when hitters simply do absurdly better than they will most of the time, and that most of the time they will hit the way they do when their hands are injured?

As I asked, what is the "it" that you do not see and which causes you to believe Devoss is preferable to him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 02, 2012, 10:31:14 am
Jes, in your original post you misspoke about their relative ages.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2012, 10:52:30 am
he reversed them, but from the context, it was obvious what was meant.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 02, 2012, 11:42:46 am
Nonetheless, I'm entitled to give him a hard time about it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on August 02, 2012, 11:49:03 am
Nonetheless, I'm entitled to give him a hard time about it.


....because we all know what would happen if the shoe was on the other foot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 02, 2012, 11:51:45 am
Looks like the foot's on the other hand now Kramer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 02, 2012, 02:55:21 pm

....because we all know what would happen if the shoe was on the other foot.

.... or if Puerto Rico were in another country.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 02, 2012, 03:00:52 pm
Jes, in your original post you misspoke about their relative ages.

Thanks for pointing that out.

If jiggs was in fact going on what I had posted, and thought that Devoss is two years younger than Torreyes, it might at least be defensible to think Devoss is the better prospect.  But when the younger guy is putting up considerably better numbers, in a tougher league, it is hard to argue the older prospect is better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 02, 2012, 03:22:15 pm
Looks like the foot's on the other hand now Kramer.

Nice.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 02, 2012, 04:00:51 pm
Ive got Jes on ignore.

I dont see any of his posts unless Im just glutton for punishment and decide to click on one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 02, 2012, 04:05:07 pm
Brett Jackson is 24 today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2012, 06:20:12 pm
Villanueva homers in his first at bat at Daytona.

Thanks, Dempster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 02, 2012, 06:22:17 pm
Everything less will now be a disappointment.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 02, 2012, 06:26:12 pm
Villanueva homers in his first at bat at Daytona.

Thanks, Dempster.

Call him up.  He has nothing more to prove at that level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 02, 2012, 07:01:38 pm
Villanueva has homered again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 02, 2012, 07:03:16 pm
First homer was to right, the second to left.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 02, 2012, 07:04:33 pm
Torreyes has also gone yard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2012, 07:12:39 pm
If he homers every at-bat, I contend the Cubs will have won that trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 02, 2012, 07:14:23 pm
I was initially down on him, but after reading several scouting reports, including an absolutely glowing one over at fangraphs, I have pretty high expectations for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 02, 2012, 07:16:43 pm
Dude seems like he's pretty good. Definitely the centerpiece of the deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2012, 07:19:04 pm
And Curt said that he had nothing more to prove at this level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2012, 08:29:26 pm
Villanueva has fallen into quite a slump.  After 8 total bases in his first two at bats, he was barely able to eke out a walk in his next at bat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 02, 2012, 08:31:40 pm
There are people here who will like that more than the homers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2012, 08:33:15 pm
Geiger is again showing that his projected power is becoming actual power.  Another home run today.

I wonder if he can hit a breaking ball?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2012, 08:38:30 pm
The disturbing thing about Villanueva is that all his Cubs home runs have come with the bases empty.  He must not be much of a clutch hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2012, 09:13:47 pm
And then he struck out.  I knew it was too good to last.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2012, 09:16:02 pm
Torreyes: 2-3, HR, 3 RBI, BB, E

Villanueva:  2-3, 2 HR, 2 RBI, BB, K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_02_ftmafa_dbcafa_1


Rosscup: 5-2-1-1-2-4

Szczur: 0-4, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_02_penaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2012, 09:28:32 pm
Geiger: 3-4, 2B, HR, RBI

Baez: 0-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_02_peoafx_qcsafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 02, 2012, 09:44:12 pm
There are people here who will like that more than the homers.

There is no one here who likes walks more than home runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on August 02, 2012, 09:55:57 pm
http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2012/08/02/cubs-win-4th-straight.html

Umpires didn't like the music...boot intern
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 02, 2012, 10:11:09 pm
Prieto keeps walking people but getting away with it, mostly by not allowing any hits.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 02, 2012, 10:24:21 pm
Geiger is again showing that his projected power is becoming actual power.  Another home run today.


Who's counting?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 02, 2012, 11:01:09 pm
I will have to admit that Roni Torreyes has been on one hell of a hot streak lately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 02, 2012, 11:24:56 pm
Vitters: 3-5, SB

Jackson: 1-4, SB, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_02_cspaaa_iowaaa_1


Vogelbach: 2-4, RBI, K

Candelario: 0-2, 2 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_02_spoasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 03, 2012, 12:04:34 am
Villanueva - You never get a second chance to make a first impression.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2012, 12:09:33 am
Almora: 2-4, 2B

Soler: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_02_angrok_cubrok_1


Malave: 1-4, 2 SB, BB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_02_angrok_cubrok_1


Emeterio: 3-4, RBI, K

Je Baez: 2-4, HR, 3 RBI, K,  ( last 5 games: 10-21, 2B, 3B, 3 HR, 10 RBI, 2 BB )



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_02_ddirok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2012, 03:13:32 am
Quote
On the third and fourth pitches he saw at Jackie Robinson Ballpark, Villanueva blasted long home runs to left field -- not only over the fence but over the batting cages beyond the fence, as well.

....

"I'm really more of a gap-to-gap hitter," Villanueva said. "But on every swing, I try to hit the ball hard somewhere.


http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2012/08/03/daytona-cubs-14.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2012, 03:50:06 am
Duane Underwood will make his debut on Sunday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 03, 2012, 05:42:17 am
It forces us to wait until tomorrow to brand Villanueva a bust.  Hate that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 03, 2012, 08:39:19 am
Nice start for Christian.  Interesting that the scouting reports haven't seemed that crazy about his power, but he's got 12 HR's already, and his original park is supposedly a pretty pitcher friendly place. 

Funny thing, though, for a guy scouted perhaps as more line-drive-gap hitter than slugger, he's got only 20 doubles/triples, and 77 singles.  Not the kind of doubles machine I'd have anticipated from the reports. 

But ordinarily a guy with 12 HR's in those parks at this age might look pretty promising power-wise.  Most likely HR output will be crucial. 

Also intersting that his K/AB rate is 22%.  That's not prohibitive for a power hitter, but that's not exactly the low-K rate that I associate with a line-drive contact hitter who walks little, swings early in the count, and doesn't face a ton of 2-strike counts.  Maybe the more usual thing:  nice swing, but so-so recognition for breaking balls?  We'll see how that goes. 


Fun to have another name in the Daytona box to watch for. 

Lots to like about a top-fielding guy with power, a good average (.288), and a pretty solid OBP (.360). 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2012, 09:37:43 am
It forces us to wait until tomorrow to brand Villanueva a bust.  Hate that.

Why?  Since he has been with the Cubs, he has struck out at a 33 % rate.  Brett Jackson has been written off for the same reason.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 03, 2012, 09:47:02 am
For those who haven't read it, the very positive report from fangraphs:

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/christian-villanueva-texas-rangers-third-base-prospect-sleeper/

"For me, the best part of scouting a game in person are those rare instances when an unknown prospect forces me to take notice. Each year, those opportunities are less than a reader would assume as maybe a half dozen players, if that, truly fit the criteria. Of those players, Christian Villanueva was the best of the bunch in 2011 and ranked only behind Jurickson Profar in terms of position prospects on that ball club.

A comp to Braves Martin Prado is imperfect, but provides some insight into the type of value Villanueva projects for at the Major League level. At 20, Villanueva and Prado posted similar OPS numbers (.803 to .785) in the South Atlantic league behind a trade off of power (Villanueva) for on base skills (Prado). However, Villanueva’s potential for positional flexibility, double-digit home run totals at the Major League level, and modest walk rates work quite well. Villanueva’s strong defensive skills may be the kicker which allows him a higher peak WAR projection."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 03, 2012, 09:59:09 am
So you want to be a minor league ballplayer?

The Boise Hawks bus, on the way from Boise to Spokane, Washington broke down near Pendleton, Oregon for five hours and forty-five minutes.  It's the third recent breakdown.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 03, 2012, 10:04:29 am
John Arguello's (CubsDen) top twenty prospects

1. Javier Baez, SS
2. Jorge Soler, OF
3. Albert Almora, OF
4. Arodys Vizcaino, RHP
5. Brett Jackson, OF
6. Josh Vitters, 3B
7. Christian Villanueva, 3B
8. Matt Szczur, OF
9. Jeimer Candelario, 3B
10. Pierce Johnson, RHP
11. Dillon Maples, RHP
12. Gioskar Amaya, 2B
13. Junior Lake, SS
14. Dan Vogelbach, 1B
15. Trey McNutt, RHP
16. Arismendy Alcantara, SS
17. Ronald Torreyes, 2B
18. Duane Underwood, RHP
19. Tony Zych, RHP
20(t). Marco Hernandez, SS
20(t). Logan Watckins, 2B

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/A-look-at-the-updated-Cubs-Top-20-prospe?blockID=750521&feedID=10336&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed (http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/A-look-at-the-updated-Cubs-Top-20-prospe?blockID=750521&feedID=10336&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 03, 2012, 10:20:59 am
Does anybody know when and where Juan Carlos Paniagua will make his Cubs' debut?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 03, 2012, 10:27:25 am
Unless Villanueava can maintain his unrealistically high HBP rate, that OBP is a bit of a mirage.

Power is indeed key for Villanueva.  He looks very much as Callis described him - an average major league 3B (not that this is a terrible thing) unless he either develops consistent power or significantly increases his walk rate.  Based on his K rate he doesn't look like a guy who'll hit for extraordinarily high average, though his tools should be enough to get him into the mid to high 200's.

If you believe in Christian, you have to hope he'll be in the mix in 2014.  That makes it kind of important to find out if Vitters is part of the future plans or not, and sooner rather than later.  That may be the incentive to call him up despite his warts.  You're going to lose anyway - let him bumble around 3B and see if he can hit major league pitching.  And maybe your coaches can turn him into an adequate fielder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 03, 2012, 10:29:49 am
Cubsin, it has been suggested that most non-Cuban international free agents sign contracts that don't allow them to play until the following season.  I'm not sure if that's true or, if it is, why that would be.

But he may not play in a game until next spring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 03, 2012, 10:32:03 am
If you believe in Christian, you have to hope he'll be in the mix in 2014.  That makes it kind of important to find out if Vitters is part of the future plans or not, and sooner rather than later.  That may be the incentive to call him up despite his warts.  You're going to lose anyway - let him bumble around 3B and see if he can hit major league pitching.  And maybe your coaches can turn him into an adequate fielder.

Those are a couple of interesting points. The second is especially intriguing. The Cub coaches have been awfully good already this year at helping players improve their defense (Castro and Soriano most notably).

One of Sveum's better qualities has been his choices and recruitment of coaches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 03, 2012, 10:40:40 am
John Arguello's (CubsDen) top twenty prospects

That seems like a reasonable list.

The one name that doesn't appear on most prospect lists that probably should is Alberto Cabrera.  Now that the performance has caught up to the scouting reports, he's a potential major asset as a late inning reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 03, 2012, 10:42:32 am
I'm surprised not to see Paniagua on that list.  He's arguably the team's second-best pitching prospect right now.  I think he's a hugely important guy for the Cubs, given how astonishingly thin the system is for impact arms.  If he were to pan out, that would be a big difference maker.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 03, 2012, 10:57:43 am
It's tough for me to rank guys like Paniagua because it's usually tough to tell exactly what you have in an international signing until he suits up and plays, regardless of the hype or the size of the signing bonus.  As Baseball America often mentions, one team's $1,000,000 bonus player can easily be another team's $100,000 bonus player.  Just look at Gerardo Concepcion as a big time example of that.

It just also seems like a lot of the Cubs high dollar international signings haven't paid big dividends so far.  We've spent some big money on pitchers in Korea the last few years, but we haven't really gotten much out of them, for instance.  Obviously we're not getting much of anything out of Concepcion.  Candelario was a $500K bonus player, and for all of the money we've poured into six figure bonuses in the Dominican lately, he seems to be the only one who's making an impact from that high dollar group so far.

For me, it's just to know exactly how good international players are until they come to the US and play. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2012, 11:02:11 am
Vogelbach's too low on that list. Johnson and Maples have 2 professional innings between them and are too high. Otherwise, a solid list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 03, 2012, 11:12:31 am
Really a lot of these prospect lists are comparing apples to oranges anyway. 

I was about to make a comment about it on that guy's pretty high ratings of #8 Candelario and #12 Amaya, who have a lot of talent but are facing terrible competition in Boise, compared to Alcantara at #16 or Torreyes at #17, who may not have quite the hype or ceilings but have solid enough ceilings as it is and are performing well at a significantly tougher level in Daytona.  (And actually I'm not so sure Amaya's ceiling is so significantly higher than Alcantara's or Torreyes'.) 

It becomes even more difficult when you throw a guy like Paniagua in the mix, who hasn't pitched in the US at all, hasn't pitched much competitively lately, and could be another one of those international guys with a wide divergence of scouting opinions.  How do you compare a guy like that to relatively high/medium ceiling players in a terrible league like Boise or low/medium ceiling players in a single-A league?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 03, 2012, 11:31:29 am
Cubsin, it has been suggested that most non-Cuban international free agents sign contracts that don't allow them to play until the following season.  I'm not sure if that's true or, if it is, why that would be.

But he may not play in a game until next spring.

The rule (if it exists) may be intended to protect 16-year old kids. But Paniagua's 22. The hold-up is probably waiting for MLB approval of his identity or permission to enter the U.S.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 03, 2012, 11:41:09 am
JR, we aren't the first organization to try and throw money at Paniagua.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2012, 11:43:09 am
John Arguello's (CubsDen) top twenty prospects

That seems like a reasonable list.

The one name that doesn't appear on most prospect lists that probably should is Alberto Cabrera.  Now that the performance has caught up to the scouting reports, he's a potential major asset as a late inning reliever.

He deliberately left off Cabrera because he is with the big club.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 03, 2012, 11:57:33 am
Paniagua will eventually be authorized and then will work at the Dominican academy. 

He won't come to US until fall instrux. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 03, 2012, 12:54:31 pm
One of Bruce Miles' periodic minor league reports

http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/7061
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 03, 2012, 01:04:07 pm
Quote
One of the cooler developments with Iowa came Wednesday, when Greg Rohan came up from Class AA Tennessee. At Iowa, he hit a pair of homers in his Triple-A debut.

Rohan is one of those names you never really think about at all, mostly because 26 year olds who play most of the season in Daytona don't ever really get any attention.  Still, he's a guy who started out as an older player to begin with at age 23 when he was drafted, and he's been a very solid hitter for a year and a half now.  Might be interesting to see what he does at Iowa now that he's finally at an age appropriate league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 03, 2012, 01:06:24 pm
Don't mess with the Rohan.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 03, 2012, 01:08:16 pm
Cabrera seems like a good test  case of that age old question : how far can a guy get with one pitch? He profiles like a hitter with a high BABIP__guys strike out a ton against him, but when they hit they hit it hard. If he had even one average offspeed pitch, he'd have a chance to be a solid reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 03, 2012, 01:34:45 pm
Like so many relievers---some outstanding---Cabrera is a two-pitch guy who works at 92-92 fastball and relies mostly on the slider. He will get hit hard when he does not command the slider, which happened on a hard line drive out to RF on a slider down the middle in his debut. So, mostly about command--not about developing a third pitch off speed. If he had a good third pitch, he'd be a starter. Just needs to stay out of the middle of the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2012, 02:02:24 pm
I'm not certain, but I think I remember ArizonaPhil saying that Paniagua was already working out in Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 03, 2012, 02:31:07 pm
Reb, I don't think it's about a third pitch - it's about a second pitch.  I don't think the slider is even average.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 03, 2012, 02:47:01 pm
Cabrera threw mostly sliders in his debut and most of them were terrific. It's the bad ones he needs to reduce.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2012, 04:10:47 pm
The reports I have read is that Cabrera is basically a slider - fastball pitcher, and needs command of the slider to be successful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 03, 2012, 06:20:00 pm
Christian Villanueva doubled in his first AB for Daytona
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 03, 2012, 06:26:26 pm
Dude's pretty good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2012, 06:51:32 pm
Quote
No. 10    RONALD TORREYES, 2B  CUBS
Team: high Class A Daytona (Florida State)
Age: 19
Why He's Here: .483/.545/.828 (14-for-29), 7 R, 2 2B, 1 3B, 2 HR, 13 RBIs, 3 BB, 0 SO, 1-for-1 SB

The Scoop: When Torreyes was hitting .184/.250/.259 at the end of May, it looked like the Reds had sold high on Torreyes by trading him to the Cubs in December in the Sean Marshall deal. Yet even while Torreyes was struggling, his contact rate still was superb. Whether it was a change in skill or just better luck, Torreyes has been one of the best hitters in the Florida State League the last two months, and he's batted .342/.402/.515 in 52 games since June 1. He may look like he'd be more at home atop a racehorse than atop a big league lineup, but don't underestimate Torreyes' ability to square up a baseball. He's one of the few players in the game who has not only more walks (25) than strikeouts (23), but also more extra-base hits (29) than whiffs. He's an unusual prospect, but he's also one of the most fun to follow.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613835.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 03, 2012, 06:52:26 pm
Daytona Cubs ‏@daytonacubs
Christian Villanueva just made an incredible over the shoulder catch after he fell down to his knees with his glove on the ground!!!


He struck out swinging his second time up - with runners on first and second and one out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 03, 2012, 07:06:28 pm
Bum
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2012, 08:09:52 pm
Torreyes: 1-5, 2 K

Villanueva: 1-4, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_03_dbcafa_dunafa_1



Tennessee rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on August 03, 2012, 08:25:39 pm
Baez is 2-2 with a home run so far tonight. Yawn.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 03, 2012, 09:23:12 pm
Hendricks pitched out of the pen for Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 03, 2012, 09:55:48 pm
Maples starts, 1-2-3 three groundouts.  Almaro with a double. 

I wonder if they'll let Maples go two innings, or if it's one and done. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 03, 2012, 09:59:45 pm
Baez: 2-4, HR, RBI, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_03_peoafx_qcsafx_1


Jackson: 0-4, RBI, 2 K, E

Vitters: 3-4, 2B

Chapman: 1-3-3-3-1-0

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_03_cspaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on August 03, 2012, 10:23:08 pm
Vitters stock seems to be rising while jacksons is taking a nose dive
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 03, 2012, 10:48:23 pm
Things arent looking real good for Brett Jackson.

He had a golden opportunity to come up and take a job if he would have hit worth a dime.

Now he's just chillin in Des Moines.

Not a lot of use for a leadoff man who strikes out all the time.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 03, 2012, 11:08:08 pm
There's not a lot of use for anyone who strikes out as much as he does.  Jackson is on pace to strike out 200 times in a minor league season.  No chance he can maintain a good enough batting average with that many strikeouts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 03, 2012, 11:20:09 pm
Jackson may not be looking great for being next year's centerfielder for the Cubs, but there's still plenty of time for him to get better.  He's still just 23 years old, so parking him in Triple-A for another half year or another year isn't that big of a deal. 

The guy still has all of the tools, and this has been his worst strikeout year to date.  This is a problem that can get better, and there's still plenty of time to try to get the K's under reasonable control before pushing him to the big leagues.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 03, 2012, 11:52:06 pm
Reb, I don't think it's about a third pitch - it's about a second pitch.  I don't think the slider is even average.

According to Brenly, Cabrera's best pitch is a slider, complimented by a 95 mph fastball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2012, 12:16:15 am
Amaya: 2-4, 3B, RBI, BB

Vogelbach: 1-3, 2B, BB, K, CS

Simpson: 4-1/3 -6-3-3-0-6, 2 HR


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_03_boiasx_spoasx_1



Almora: 2-4, 2B, 1st pro BB

Soler: DNP (sick)

Maples: 1-2/3 -1-0-0-2-1, WP, HB

Blackburn: 3-1/3 -1-0-0-1-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_03_cubrok_diarok_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2012, 12:38:10 am
Game completed from 7/18-

Rodriguez: 4-1/3 -0-0-0-1-5

Emeterio: 3-4, 2B

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_18_dwsrok_dcurok_1



Emeterio: 1-3, 2B, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_03_dwsrok_dcurok_1



Chris Pieters is a mess:  1-2/3 -2-4-3-4-1, HB, 3 WP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_03_dchrok_dgirok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2012, 12:51:00 am
According to Brenly, Cabrera's best pitch is a slider, complimented by a 95 mph fastball.

This is what Keith Law had to say:

Quote
The Cubs threw reliever Alberto Cabrera, who has one of the most electric fastballs I've seen from a prospect in a long time -- but doesn't have much else. That fastball was 95-97 for two innings with plus-plus sinking life, and he was around the plate with it a lot more than you'd expect given its movement. His changeup was dead-straight and very hittable, while the slider is short but not sharp; one of those two pitches has to come along this year for him to be a viable bullpen option, but he can probably go further than most relievers with one pitch because of its velocity and life.


Admittedly that was in the spring, and I haven't seen him since the callup - but that was my impression watching him then.  And if his slider has really improved that much, it's hard to understand why he was giving up so many hits to AAA hitters with a 95-97 sinking fastball to go with it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 04, 2012, 12:52:35 am
I guess you need to talk to Brenly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2012, 12:54:34 am
I guess you need to talk to Brenly.

Or the AAA hitters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 04, 2012, 01:03:57 am
Cabrera had 29 Ks in 19 innings at Iowa.  You can't do that if you don't have good stuff. 

Also, low walks.

The hits are a classic "wild in the strike zone" problem.

In his MLB debut, he showed a very good slider, but one was horrible and got hammered.  That will probably happen too with poorly located fastballs, but he threw very few fastballs in that game.

The K-W and K-innings ratios show that this is guy with real upside.  But, we'll see if he can command his stuff.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2012, 01:58:23 am
29 Ks in 19 IP - and 29 hits, too.  It's not an everyday profile, that's for sure - and it's not a new one either, as last season he gave up 178 hits in 137 minors IP.  That goes beyond wild in the strike zone - that reflects a deeper issue with his stuff.  I'm skeptical that a guy who gives up that many hits has anything offspeed that's consistently usable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2012, 02:03:59 am
Opponents only hit .217 off Cabrera in AA this year. Perhaps his high BAA in Iowa is a result of small sampling and bad luck. I don't think you can compare it to last year because he was a starter then and obviously the Cubs thought he was better suited for relief. His 74 K's in 56-1/3 IP over three levels this year would seem to speak to very good stuff.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2012, 02:18:43 am
The Ks speak of very good stuff, the hits speak of major issues.  Like I said earlier, he's like a hitter with an extraordinarily high BABIP - when guys make contact, they hit him hard.  I suppose more than anything else it's inconsistency - sometimes he goes to the well and the slider is there, sometimes it isn't. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2012, 04:07:48 am
This guy put up video from Mesa that contains highlights and an interview with Almora.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GebJl7E2jw&list=UUSA7eIDN5Pj1_e7n71fY8jQ&index=1&feature=plcp



His website:


http://boysofspring.com/the-future-is-here-2/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 04, 2012, 07:29:42 am
Solar looks like a man among boys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 04, 2012, 08:24:44 am
This guy put up video from Mesa that contains highlights and an interview with Almora.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GebJl7E2jw&list=UUSA7eIDN5Pj1_e7n71fY8jQ&index=1&feature=plcp (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GebJl7E2jw&list=UUSA7eIDN5Pj1_e7n71fY8jQ&index=1&feature=plcp)

His website:

http://boysofspring.com/the-future-is-here-2/ (http://boysofspring.com/the-future-is-here-2/)
Tim Sheridan is the HoHoKam PA announcer.   His site is very useful during spring training.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 04, 2012, 08:48:48 am
Tim Sheridan is the HoHoKam PA announcer.   His site is very useful during spring training.
Probably for the AFL season too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 04, 2012, 09:15:43 am
Thanks very much for the link, Chris. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 04, 2012, 09:42:40 am
The bad news just never seems to stop:  Rodrigo Lopez is on the Iowa DL with a shoulder problem.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2012, 10:04:41 am
Ben Badler's BA chat:


Quote
Itto (PR): Will we see Cubs RHP JC Paniagua pitching this year?


Ben Badler: His contract still has to be approved by MLB, so 2013 is more likely.



Quote
Diego (Portland): Great to see Torreyes' bat coming around. How does his glove rate, and is Altuve a fair comp for what we might expect to see from him?


Ben Badler: He's a good defender at second base. There are some similarities to Altuve, but there just really aren't any comps for a guy who's maybe 5-6, makes contact like he's hitting off a tee and can do some decent damage when he connects too. At the same age, Torreyes is more advanced than Altuve was, both offensively and defensively.



Quote
Itto (Puerto Rico): Christian Villanueva hit 2HR in his first game with Daytona. Is he still a BA top 100 player by the end of the year? Is his prospect status increase this year?


Ben Badler: Solid prospect, but there's enough questions from scouts on how much impact is there with the bat that I think he's on the periphery of that list going into next year.


Quote
Ryan (Chitown): Once Vizcaino recovers, do you believe he'll be a SP or RP? Would you consider him the Cubs' top minor league arm at present?


Ben Badler: The track record of his inability to stay healthy just screams reliever. That said, his stuff is absolutely filthy, so there's potential for him to be a dominant reliever. Given the lack of pitching in that system, yeah, I'd say he's the Cubs top pitching prospect.


Quote
esteban (miami): ive heard some good things about baez's power.. would you call me crazy if i compared it to sano's power?


Ben Badler: I've gotten 70 grades on his power, but I'd still give the edge to Sano there. As a complete hitter, Baez all day.


Quote
jb (Iowa): Any chance Cubs could have a top 5 system by next spring ? t hanks


Ben Badler: That would surprise me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 04, 2012, 10:46:36 am
Wow, the favorable comp to Altuve is pretty awesome for Torreyes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2012, 11:00:05 am
That top 100 placement for Villanueva by BA was odd, since no one else had him even close.  It won't necessarily mean backsliding when he's off the next list - just a reality check.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 04, 2012, 11:34:47 am
Jackson may not be looking great for being next year's centerfielder for the Cubs, but there's still plenty of time for him to get better.  He's still just 23 years old, so parking him in Triple-A for another half year or another year isn't that big of a deal. 

The guy still has all of the tools, and this has been his worst strikeout year to date.  This is a problem that can get better, and there's still plenty of time to try to get the K's under reasonable control before pushing him to the big leagues.

It's unusual to want to bring up a prospect to the major leagues in order to work on a flaw or weakness, but apparently that's what the Cubs are considering for Jackson.

Sveum, a former hitting coach, sees the value in working directly with Jackson right now. Sveum also mentioned how Jackson turned it on earlier this season after a visit from James Rowson, the minor-league coordinator who took over as hitting coach once Rudy Jaramillo was fired.     

“That’s some of the things we talk about – developing here,” Sveum said. “He’ll have the benefit of me and J-Ro and the things we see. … Those are things that definitely come into play, (as well as) us being able to see him against big-league pitching.”


http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-have-to-find-out-about-Jackson-Vitt?blockID=751261&feedID=10336 (http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-have-to-find-out-about-Jackson-Vitt?blockID=751261&feedID=10336)

But since Jackson won't be brought up unless he can play regularly, it will take either an injury or a trade (Soriano or LaHair) for that to happen.  I don't think the Cubs are going to bench LaHair, even though he's been struggling - but they might trade him without getting much in return to open up a spot for Jackson I suppose.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2012, 11:47:06 am
Bruce Miles ‏@BruceMiles2112
#Cubs promote SS Javier Baez from Peoria (A) to Daytona (A).

Predicted: Baez will be a September callup in 2013.  He can easily do what Castro did in terms of progressing quickly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 04, 2012, 11:47:27 am
Javier Baez has been promoted to Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 04, 2012, 11:49:12 am
Baez story

http://peoria.chiefs.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120804&content_id=36111518&vkey=news_t443&fext=.jsp&sid=t443
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2012, 11:52:24 am
Poor Saunders - hitting .425 as a pro and .310 in the FSL, and he gets demoted...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 04, 2012, 12:11:18 pm
Wow, can't believe they already have him at Daytona! Was hoping to hea out to Peoria and catch him in a game.

It's obvious he's not being challenged, and he may need a higher level of competition to work on the things that need help in his game. Why be patient when every other time you swing the bat it's going for extra bases?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 04, 2012, 12:33:03 pm
29 Ks in 19 IP - and 29 hits, too.  It's not an everyday profile, that's for sure - and it's not a new one either, as last season he gave up 178 hits in 137 minors IP.  That goes beyond wild in the strike zone - that reflects a deeper issue with his stuff.  I'm skeptical that a guy who gives up that many hits has anything offspeed that's consistently usable.

If you are sceptical of his success, no problem.  So am I.  But you are basing your scepticism on something that is not factual.  It is NOT because he throws only one pitch.  It is because he throws two pitches, but not with acceptable command.  If he gains command of the two pitches, he will succeed.  If he doesn't, he won't.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2012, 12:42:04 pm
My argument was never that he only threw one pitch - it was that he only threw one pitch that was any good.  And the numbers seem to back that up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 04, 2012, 01:27:31 pm
Baez needed to be promoted.

He's gonna be a Chicago Cub a lot sooner than you think.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 04, 2012, 01:46:45 pm
Interesting.  Baez will almost certainly go the the Arizona Fall League.  Obviously everything depends upon how he performs for the rest of the season and the AFL, but if he does well enough to begin next year in Tennessee, we could see him in the majors by mid season 2013.

I hope not.  He is likely to go through the same problems that Castro went through.  His defense, and certainly his fundamentals are not likely to be as advanced as his offense, and we will have to listen to the same crap we heard about Castro.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 04, 2012, 01:57:35 pm
Wow, the favorable comp to Altuve is pretty awesome for Torreyes.

If you look at the stat lines of each of them, Torreyes would actually have a slight edge.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 04, 2012, 02:00:34 pm
Interesting.  Baez will almost certainly go the the Arizona Fall League.  Obviously everything depends upon how he performs for the rest of the season and the AFL, but if he does well enough to begin next year in Tennessee, we could see him in the majors by mid season 2013.

I hope not.  He is likely to go through the same problems that Castro went through.  His defense, and certainly his fundamentals are not likely to be as advanced as his offense, and we will have to listen to the same crap we heard about Castro.

Castro's problem has not been that his defense is not fundamentally sound, but that the guy absolutely loses focus.  But so what if we "have to listen to the same crap?"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 04, 2012, 02:19:16 pm
Castro's problem was that he was losing focus in the major leagues.  He was having the kinds of problems that many go through in the minors, and grow out of it before they are seen by major league fans.  Half the posters on this board were certain that he would NEVER be able to remain at shortstop, in spite of the hands, range and arm that he showed almost every day.

Kids screw up.  That is why the seldom go straight from high school th the majors.  If Baez comes up next year, HE will screw up, and half the board will declare him a failure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 04, 2012, 02:21:16 pm
Baez WON'T be up midseason 2013. If EVERYTHING goes right he might get a Septeber cup o joe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 04, 2012, 02:23:17 pm
That is what I thought about Castro.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 04, 2012, 03:30:00 pm
Baez will also be dealing with a position change probably next year.  I would think a September call up would not be out of the question if he continues to hit.  These next two years are for develpment anyway.  It's not like a Baez error is going to cost the Cubs their shot at the playoff or anything.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 04, 2012, 03:33:59 pm
I think some of us are getting ahead of ourselves on Baez. He may well reach the majors sometime next year, but it's still unlikely. Jed and Theo have shown a tendency to move slowly on promotions. He'd need an almost seamless move to high-A, a good showing relative the his experience level in the AFL, a strong season in AA and a quick adaptation to 3B to pull that off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 04, 2012, 04:08:25 pm
One way or another, the Cubs are going to have a really strong home grown infield in a few years.

Already we have Rizzo, Barney, and Castro.

Coming down the line:

1B - Vogelbach is the only guy with a chance to be interesting enough to prompt a conversation. That we have anyone in the system that might merit such a conversation is remarkable, given Rizzo's performance.

2B - Barney is elite defensively, not so much on offense. Gioskar Amaya and Roni Torreyes (2 of my personal favorite prospects) are looking very strong due to off the charts contact ability. Either one could make Barney a very valuable trading chip as he continues to establish his defensive reputation. Newly acquired Villanueva probably profiles best at 2B, based on scouting reports that he has the tools to be a plus defender at the position.

SS - Barring Castro's putting on a lot of weight, I don't think anyone is going to move him. Current SS prospects have a future with this organization at the big league level only if their tools profile well at other positions, like...

3B ... Javier Baez. The position is his to lose. Vitters has a very narrow window to establish any sort of value with the Baez freight train barreling down on him. Villanueva is interesting here, too, but is probably going to have to make it work at another position (as mentioned in 2B write up).

All IF positions profile in one of 3 ways: current young major league regular performing well above replacement level, a seemingly can't miss prospect in the minors, or enough minor league depth that you figure something worthwhile will come of it. That's pretty awesome.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 04, 2012, 04:27:10 pm
Daytona Cubs Baseball Organization
The Cubs would like to welcome 2011 First Round Pick SS Javier Baez to Daytona! Baez is in tonight's starting lineup for the 6:30p.m. game against the 'Jays in Dunedin. Tune in to the broadcast on AM1230 WSBB or at daytonacubs.com ...

1. John Andreoli LF
2. Roni Torreyes 2B
3. Javier Baez SS
4. Rebel Ridling 1B
5. Christian Villanueva 3B
6. Rubi Silva CF
7. Elieser Bonne RF
8. Rafael Lopez C
9. Micah Gibbs DH
RHP Matt Loosen vs. LHP Egan Smith
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 04, 2012, 04:56:31 pm
In a perfect world Vitters shows enough to push Baez to second.  A double play combo of Baez and Castro would be one of the best offensively in the majors and could be good defensively as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 04, 2012, 05:52:15 pm
I don't remember half the board declaring Castro a "failure"...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 04, 2012, 07:20:57 pm
All IF positions profile in one of 3 ways: current young major league regular performing well above replacement level, a seemingly can't miss prospect in the minors, or enough minor league depth that you figure something worthwhile will come of it. That's pretty awesome.

Yes, but.... it is hard to forget those heady days when we had three sure All-Stars, all coming up about the same time, with at least one destined for the HOF: Choi, Hill and Patterson.

And then there are the prospects who reach the majors, do remarkably well as rookies.... and then become dead fish: Jerome Walton and Giovani Soto.

Things are looking promising.

I agree completely with the renewed emphasis on the farm (it is the only way to go).

But we still need to be prepared for a large number of these guys to flame out, stall our or burn out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 04, 2012, 07:46:07 pm
Now, after pointing out how most prospects never amount to much....
Baez this year at age 19 in 57 A ball games in the Midwest League had a line of .333/.383/   .596/   .979, good for 2nd in BA, and 3rd in OPS.

Another recent major league (non-Cub) prospect who got promoted in mid-season from A ball in the Midwest League had a line of .324   /.389/.565/.953 when he was 20, a year older that Baez; 5th in both BA and OPS.

Anyone know who produced that second hitting line?

The big hitting stat difference between the two, which underscores concerns about Baez and might help identify the other one-time prospect is the walk to K ratio: 9/48 for Baez in 235 PA; 38/37 in 440 PA for "the other guy."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 04, 2012, 07:49:45 pm
I don't remember half the board declaring Castro a "failure"...

A failure at shortstop.  All we heard was that he had proved that he would have to move off the premium position and settle in at second base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2012, 08:20:45 pm
Baez: 0-4, 2 K

Torreyes: 0-3, SF, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_04_dbcafa_dunafa_1


Szczur: 1-4, 2B, 2 K

Lake: 2-3, 2 RBI, SB, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_04_tenaax_jacaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 04, 2012, 08:44:42 pm
Does anyone know what Arismendy Alcantara's injury is at Daytona ?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 04, 2012, 08:55:08 pm
http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2012/07/18/loosen-lifts-d-cubs-to-win.html

Some sort of leg injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 04, 2012, 09:05:47 pm
Baez will probably be a player that Cubs will want to push back his free agency by a year.

That means that he is unlikely to be a September call-up but will start a season in the minors and get an early call-up, like Castro's early May call-up his rookie season. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 04, 2012, 09:30:46 pm
Thks-- JeffH
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2012, 09:52:35 pm
Rusin: 7-4-1-1-1-8

Jackson: 1-3, BB, 2 K, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_04_cspaaa_iowaaa_1


Bour: 2-2, HR, 3 RBI, 2 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_04_tenaax_jacaax_2


Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_04_cliafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2012, 09:56:31 pm
Alcala: 3-4, 2B, 3 RBI, SB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_04_dcurok_dwsrok_1


DSL2 suspended.   Mesa idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 04, 2012, 10:06:01 pm
No guesses at the name of the former prospect with a hitting ling in low A very similar to Baez, only when the other guy was a year older?

No guesses?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 04, 2012, 10:18:12 pm
three finger Brown
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 04, 2012, 11:40:18 pm
Vogelbach: 2-4, 3 RBI, BB, K

Candelario: 1-4, 2B, RBI, BB, 2 E

Scott: 5-1/3 -5-2-1-1-2,   13-3 GO/FO


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_04_boiasx_spoasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 04, 2012, 11:43:54 pm
One way or another, the Cubs are going to have a really strong home grown infield in a few years.

Already we have Rizzo, Barney, and Castro.

Coming down the line:

1B - Vogelbach is the only guy with a chance to be interesting enough to prompt a conversation. That we have anyone in the system that might merit such a conversation is remarkable, given Rizzo's performance.

2B - Barney is elite defensively, not so much on offense. Gioskar Amaya and Roni Torreyes (2 of my personal favorite prospects) are looking very strong due to off the charts contact ability. Either one could make Barney a very valuable trading chip as he continues to establish his defensive reputation. Newly acquired Villanueva probably profiles best at 2B, based on scouting reports that he has the tools to be a plus defender at the position.

SS - Barring Castro's putting on a lot of weight, I don't think anyone is going to move him. Current SS prospects have a future with this organization at the big league level only if their tools profile well at other positions, like...

3B ... Javier Baez. The position is his to lose. Vitters has a very narrow window to establish any sort of value with the Baez freight train barreling down on him. Villanueva is interesting here, too, but is probably going to have to make it work at another position (as mentioned in 2B write up).

All IF positions profile in one of 3 ways: current young major league regular performing well above replacement level, a seemingly can't miss prospect in the minors, or enough minor league depth that you figure something worthwhile will come of it. That's pretty awesome.

In addition, there's a few others (Junior Lake, Jeimer Candelario, Zeke DeVoss, Marco Hernandez, Arismendy Alcantara, Logan Watkins, Marck Malave and a theoretically healthy Ian Stewart) who have a chance. Obviously, some will fail, some will be traded and some will be utility players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 04, 2012, 11:50:40 pm
It dont look to me like anything's stopping Vogelbach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 05, 2012, 12:21:24 am
Vogelbach is doing well enough in Boise that I would like to see him get some at bats in Peoria, if for no other reason than I would like him to be on the team when they play in Wisconsin later this month.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: buff on August 05, 2012, 12:33:43 am
Most if not all the castro moving to 2nd talk was before we traded Lee to Tampa
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 05, 2012, 02:02:28 am
No.  Most, if not all of the Castro moving to 2nd talk was last year, when he was making quite a few errors, both physical and mental.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 05, 2012, 02:31:52 am
Before the Garza trade, some of us felt that Lee would probably eventually be better than Castro defensively, and a subset of that group felt the difference could be enough to justify moving the veteran player, and the rest didn't. Both sides had reasonable and amicable arguments. On the other hand, the few who have suggested moving Castro since then have assumed he'd never improve his defense, even though every other SS who reached the majors at a young age had done so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 05, 2012, 02:33:52 am
I don't think any scout feels Lee won't be better than Castro defensively.  That's not the same as calling Castro a failure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 05, 2012, 02:43:43 am
And I don't think any scout feels Castro won't be better than Lee offensively. That's not the same as calling Lee a failure. They're both likely to have good MLB careers, though Castro's is more certain. Lee will probably be a leadoff hitter with a good OBP. Castro will hit further down in the lineup, with a better SLG. FWIW, I thought Castro would stay at SS and Lee would move to 2B. As Barney has shown, a good defensive 2B is important, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 05, 2012, 03:14:04 am
Id prefer Vogelbach spend the rest of the year in Boise.  We were all hyped up about Canderlario and than he's come back down to earth.  Id like to see Vogelbach given a chance to struggle before he goes to Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 05, 2012, 03:42:14 am
Id prefer Vogelbach spend the rest of the year in Boise.  We were all hyped up about Canderlario and than he's come back down to earth.  Id like to see Vogelbach given a chance to struggle before he goes to Peoria.

Candelario is currently 8th in BA, 20th in OBP, 13th is SLG and 12th in OPS, out of about 50-55 qualifiers. He's also still only 18 in a league where the average age is close to 21.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 05, 2012, 04:58:20 am
Candelario's OPS his last 120 at-bats is down 300 points from his first 60 at-bats. Bitterman certainly has a point there. That said, I can't believe the Vitters suggestion in the another topic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 05, 2012, 07:39:54 am
Bruce Miles posted this yesterday.   I'm told Alcantara is probably out for the year. Jae-Hoon Ha, though, should be back by next week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 05, 2012, 02:11:35 pm
Iowa

6  Tolbert
8  Sappelt 
9  Adduci 
5  Rohan
3  Lalli 
7  Frazier 
4  Hernandez 
2  Esposito
1  Coleman
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 05, 2012, 02:42:15 pm
Who are those guys?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 05, 2012, 03:27:43 pm
No doubt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 05, 2012, 03:58:32 pm
Organizational players, Quadruple-A guys, and roster fillers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 05, 2012, 03:59:53 pm
Where is Bobby Scales when you need him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 05, 2012, 05:43:41 pm
So far today - Baez - three at bats - three strike outs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 05, 2012, 05:44:18 pm
Jackson has shown him that that is the path to the big club.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 05, 2012, 06:32:36 pm
There are exactly zero position prospects to follow at Iowa.

I thought Epstein was going to restock the minor league system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 05, 2012, 06:36:32 pm
Baez: 0-4, 3 K

Francescon: 2-2-2-0-0-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_05_dbcafa_dunafa_1


Jensen: 5-5-1-1-0-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_05_cliafx_peoafx_1


Coleman: 6-2-0-0-2-8

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_05_renaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 05, 2012, 08:14:25 pm
There are exactly zero position prospects to follow at Iowa.

HA!


Coleman: 6-2-0-0-2-8

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_05_renaaa_iowaaa_1

You just aren't looking closely enough....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 05, 2012, 08:16:02 pm
LOL
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 05, 2012, 09:53:26 pm
McNutt: 3-1-1-1-2-3, HB

Szczur: 0-4, BB, K  (.135)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_05_tenaax_jacaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 05, 2012, 11:47:30 pm
It has been several days, I think, since Soler has played.  I hope he isn't hurt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 05, 2012, 11:51:36 pm
It has been several days, I think, since Soler has played.  I hope he isn't hurt.

I read on NSBB that he's been reported as ill.  I don't know what his illness is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 05, 2012, 11:52:23 pm
Probably mono.  All Cubs prospects seem to get that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 05, 2012, 11:55:13 pm
Probably mono.  All Cubs prospects seem to get that.

If it is mono, they need to start sending these kids to a different chicken ranch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2012, 12:49:11 am
Amaya: 0-6, 5 K

Vogelbach: 1-5, HR, RBI, BB, 3 K   ( Go-ahead HR in 11th )

Candelario: 1-6, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_05_boiasx_spoasx_1


Almora: 1-5, K

Underwood: 1/3 -3-4-3-0-1, HR

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_05_cubrok_giarok_1


DSL teams off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 06, 2012, 01:44:29 am
It's the AZ league and all, but Almora isn't off to the best of starts ....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2012, 03:57:13 am
Quote
but Almora isn't off to the best of starts ....

He's had a better start than either of the first two picks in the draft got off to.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 06, 2012, 07:33:15 am
It's the AZ league and all, but Almora isn't off to the best of starts ....

He has a .771 OPS.  42% of his hits have been for extra bases.  He's struck out in only 9% of his plate appearances.  He's 2/2 in stolen bases.

bitterman is a tough crowd.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 06, 2012, 08:06:16 am
Well just like Vitters probably needs to be sent back to Double-A to make absolutely sure he's mastered it, if or when the day comes that Almora looks like he's ready for the big leagues, we'll probably also want to send him back to Mesa to make sure these first 42 at bats aren't some sign that rookie league pitchers are too much to handle for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 06, 2012, 08:10:13 am
I read on NSBB that he's been reported as ill.  I don't know what his illness is.

Well Concepcion has mono... and we had heard the two were very close.....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 06, 2012, 08:40:51 am
Vogelbach homers are now known as Vogelbombs in Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 06, 2012, 09:30:01 am
Organizational players, Quadruple-A guys, and roster fillers.
The I-Cubs will be in town for four games next week.  I've cancelled my plans to see a couple of them.  Glad I didn't buy tickets in advance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 06, 2012, 10:30:38 am
Stars of the future, and you are giving up your chance to see them as they develop.

You'll have your regrets when other real fans have their collection of autographs from the group of Hall of Famers that team is ultimately going to produce.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 06, 2012, 10:31:58 am
Loosen turned in a pair of nondescript seasons in the Cubs system after signing for $30,000 as a 23rd-round pick from Jacksonville in 2010, leaving no hints that he'd break out this year. Even after getting roughed up in his last two starts, he tops the high Class A Florida State League in wins (10) and opponent average (.190), and he has an overall record of 10-4, 3.33 with a 96-37 K-BB ratio in 100 innings.

Loosen is a prospect in the sense that he has a chance to get to the big leagues, but he's not a top prospect. The 6-foot-2, 205-pounder works mostly with an average fastball and he can run it up to 94 mph on occasion. His curveball is better than his slider, though both are effective, while his changeup lacks consistency. He throws a decent amount of strikes but his control and command still need improvement.

At 23, Loosen is old for his level and needs to get tested by more advanced hitters. He projects more as a middle reliever than a starter, and if we slapped a BA grade on him, it would be 45/High.

As for McNutt, whom we ranked as Chicago's best pitching prospect entering the season, he has hit a wall. Though he flashed a pair of plus-plus pitches and showed promise as a potential No. 2 starter at two Class A stops in 2010, he hasn't been the same guy since.

Now relegated to the bullpen during his third stint in Double-A, he just hasn't shown the same stuff with any consistency. He no longer misses many bats and his command, never his strong suit, has backslid as well. He now looks like a definite reliever, and he's going to have to snap out of his funk to get a big league opportunity.

The Cubs lack quality pitching at the upper levels of their farm system, which is why they drafted high school arms Paul Blackburn, Duane Underwood, Ryan McNeil and Anthony Prieto in the first five rounds in June and traded for four pitchers (most notably Arodys Vizcaino) in July. Of the guys who were in the system at the start of the year, the best young arms (21 and under) are Dillon Maples (who didn't make his pro debut until July 29 after tweaking his elbow), Tony Zych and Jose Rosario.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 06, 2012, 01:17:02 pm
I guess I have to qualify every thing I say?  I realize it's also just 42 ABs, but his .318 obp isnt exactly a great start.

I recall being hammered for attacking Jackson as our number one prospect and repeating how his K's make it unlikely he'll be any good.  Is it OK to talk about that now?

As far as Vitters going back to AA, what happened to the new philosophy that you don't promote guys until their ready?  Until they prove themselves at their respective level?  Did Vitters ever show he could be successful at AA?  It seems everyone has great AAA numbers - Valbuena, Cardenas, etc.  So what Vitters has done in Iowa doesnt indicate any sort of turn around to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 06, 2012, 01:44:48 pm
I was preparing myself for the revelation that Soler has mono since he and Concepcion are such good friends, but luckily they are on different levels.  So, hopefully, it's just a simple illness and he'll be back in the line up in the next day or so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 06, 2012, 01:57:05 pm
The symptoms for mono and Valley Fever are quite similar.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 06, 2012, 07:08:51 pm
Quote
THIRTY SOMETHING: The Cubs have lost 16 of their last 18 and are 5-20 since the All-Star Break, including a 2-7 mark at home. The Cubs have the fewest wins in full- season minor league baseball and are back at a season-low 30 games under .500 for the second time in three days. The is the furthest below .500 since the Cubs finished 57- 87 in 2000. This year's team is tied with the 1981 club for the worst record in franchise history through 116 games.

And that's with Vitters and Jackson
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 06, 2012, 07:51:02 pm
With a rotation of Raley, Germano, Smardzija, Wood and Volstad, it's not likely to get better any time soon. I don't think we can "catch" the Astros, but I do expect the Cubs to draft second overall. We should get a very good college pitcher in the draft, and pick of the litter on the International scene.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 06, 2012, 07:51:11 pm
And I thought no one could be worse than the Redbirds...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2012, 08:09:05 pm
It'll be hard for the Cubs to make up 5 games on the Rockies. I'm betting the Cubs will end up with something around the 5th or 6th pick and miss out on Stanek, Manaea and Martinez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 06, 2012, 08:31:27 pm
Without their three best pitchers and their fourth best on an innings limit, I doubt the Cubs "fall out" of the top three.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 06, 2012, 08:32:55 pm
Samardzija-Wood-Germano-Volstad-Raley

Wild, wild stuff.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 06, 2012, 08:34:21 pm
The Cubs have 6 games vs the Rockies and Astros left, I don't think anything is impossible.  It would be nice if the Cubs could put some distance between themselves and the Padres starting today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 06, 2012, 08:41:39 pm
I take that back the Cubs have 9 games against the Astros left.  The final series in Oct. May determime who gets the first pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 06, 2012, 08:48:50 pm
Let's see where the draft pick turns out to be, but better that guys like Jackson, Rizzo, W. Castillo, Vitters, Wood, Samardzija, Cabrera, Castro, Barney do well for remainder of the season.  If that means some more wins than you guys want, you'll just have to put up with it.  ;D
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 06, 2012, 08:49:55 pm
In those 9 games, is it legal to pitch Coleman in all of them?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2012, 09:38:43 pm
Quote
Without their three best pitchers and their fourth best on an innings limit, I doubt the Cubs "fall out" of the top three.

None of that really matters. At the end of 2010 the Cubs went on a huge run with basically a poor AAA roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 06, 2012, 09:57:10 pm
Sean Manaea's cap cod stats.  5-1, 1.22 ERA, 51.2 IP, 85K, 7 BB, 21 H.  Lefty, with a 96 mph fastball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 06, 2012, 10:02:18 pm
None of that really matters. At the end of 2010 the Cubs went on a huge run with basically a poor AAA roster.

But right now, they pretty much have a horrible AA roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 06, 2012, 10:03:55 pm
Manaea had a 3.50 ERA during the 2012 college season at Indiana State.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2012, 10:09:39 pm
Szczur: 2-5, 2B, SB

Bour: 2-4, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_06_tenaax_jacaax_1


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2012, 10:34:10 pm
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_06_renaaa_iowaaa_1


Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_06_cliafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2012, 10:34:21 pm
Emeterio: 2-4, 3B, RBI, BB, SB

Je Baez: 3-5, 2 2B, RBI, 2 SB, K

Paulino: 5-4-3-3-1-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_06_dcurok_drdrok_1


Santana: 4-4-2-2-0-4

Araujo: 3-1-0-0-1-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_06_dwarok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 06, 2012, 10:36:55 pm
It'll be hard for the Cubs to make up 5 games on the Rockies. I'm betting the Cubs will end up with something around the 5th or 6th pick and miss out on Stanek, Manaea and Martinez.

Oh, yea of little faith.

It is not just the rotation, but Jackson and Vitters are going to help, too.

I'm fully confident these guys can lose enough for the top draft pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2012, 10:44:38 pm
The top draft pick is gone. Houston is 10 games worse than the Cubs and have played at a 120 loss pace for two months.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 06, 2012, 10:47:14 pm
Houston just tied it up in the bottom of the 9th against Washington....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 06, 2012, 10:49:14 pm
The Cubs could end up with Mark Appel in next year's draft, if things break right.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 06, 2012, 10:51:19 pm
Meh, I'd rather have one of the other three I mentioned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 06, 2012, 10:51:44 pm
Then we would have to decide who to pick in 2014 with the comp pick for not signing him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2012, 12:45:48 am
Amaya: 3-5, HR, RBI, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_06_boiasx_eveasx_1



Almora: 1-6, K, CS, Assist

Soler: 1-4, BB, K, HBP

Johnson: 2-2-0-0-0-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_06_brrrok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 07, 2012, 01:24:56 am
Thank you, Chris, for posting the links these minor league box scores.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 07, 2012, 10:01:03 am
Gioskar!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 07, 2012, 10:12:29 am
Gesundheit
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 07, 2012, 10:23:19 am
Gioskar!

I like me some Gioskar too, but the one thing I'd say is be careful about getting too excited about what happens in Boise.  For Gioskar, it was another night of facing a 21st round pick, a 43rd round pick, and one of those 10th round senior signs from this year's draft. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 07, 2012, 04:22:32 pm
I like me some Gioskar too, but the one thing I'd say is be careful about getting too excited about what happens in Boise.  For Gioskar, it was another night of facing a 21st round pick, a 43rd round pick, and one of those 10th round senior signs from this year's draft. 

Buzzkill.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 07, 2012, 05:43:59 pm
Carrie Muskat answered a question on her blog that asked about the last time Cubs traded a veteran for a prospect who ended up making a lasting impact in the majors?

Anybody since getting Ryne Sandbrg?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 07, 2012, 06:29:16 pm
George Bell for Sammy Sosa?

A more recent trade might be Delrosa for Archer if he pans out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 07, 2012, 06:31:41 pm
ARam and DLee?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 07, 2012, 07:03:15 pm
Tuffy Rhodes
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 07, 2012, 07:10:06 pm
Actually the only ones I can think of went the wrong way...Sutcliffe for Joe Carter; Aguilera for Lohse; Karchner for Garland; Tavarez for Willis; some of those aren't super impact, but...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: BullingersEars on August 07, 2012, 07:20:02 pm
Brant Brown for Jon Lieber goes the wrong way too...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 07, 2012, 07:57:54 pm
Jacob Brigham knocked out in the first inning tonight for Tenn (6 earned runs).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2012, 08:57:13 pm
Baez: 2-4, 2B, 3 RBI

Villaneuva: 1-3, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_07_lakafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2012, 09:43:28 pm
Peralta: 7-2-1-1-0-14,  92 pitches

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_07_cliafx_peoafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 07, 2012, 10:09:58 pm
Peralta has a good arm, supposedly - usually throws in the low 90's.  His K rates haven't been that impressive but that's 59 hits in 71 IP this season.  If his age is accurate he's about age-appropriate for the league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2012, 10:24:34 pm
Szczur: 1-4, 3B, CS, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_07_tenaax_jacaax_1


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_07_renaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2012, 10:28:00 pm
Emeterio: 2-3, 2B, RBI, CS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_07_20_drdrok_dcurok_1


Emeterio: 1-3, RBI, E

Je Baez: 3-3, 2 CS, PO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_07_drdrok_dcurok_1



Torrez: 4-5-2-2-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_07_dchrok_dwarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 07, 2012, 11:53:14 pm
Almora: 1-5, 2 SB, K

Soler: 1-4, RBI, 2 SB, BB, K

McNeil: 2-1/3 -1-0-0-3-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_07_cubrok_angrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 08, 2012, 12:19:42 am
Vogelbach: 1-3, HR, RBI, BB, K

Amaya: 2-5, 3B, RBI, K

Candelario: 1-3, 2B, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_07_boiasx_eveasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 08, 2012, 09:33:29 am
In light of Jackson's 8 K's in 9 PA stretch, I really wonder if walks are being so overemphasized with players today that it's to the detriment to a lot of players.  Like Jackson for instance, a big part of why he strikes out so much is that he works long counts and also draws a lot of walks. 

Not everyone is meant to draw 80-100 walks in a year, and the ones who do usually have big time power that pitchers try to stay away from.  I don't know if telling someone who isn't a major power hitter that he needs to walk 80 times in a season is an especially healthy thing in all cases, especially when it leads to more strikeouts in the case of a guy like Jackson, which reduces batting average and in turn reduces OBP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on August 08, 2012, 09:56:50 am
I don't think walks are the goal, they are the byproduct of the goal which is being more selective at the plate.  If the pitch is in the hitting zone then the hitter should swing hard.  If not then selective hitters wait for that pitch which will result in more walks.  I have a hard time believing that the current philosophy emphasizes walking as an end result.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 08, 2012, 09:59:24 am
I kind of look at Zeke DeVoss as an example of a guy who looks like he is "artificially" walking too much right now.  He's a speed guy, and pitchers are supposed to do everything they can to prevent walking a guy like him.  With DeVoss, though, his walk rate is especially good (17%) but looks like is leading to a bad K rate (25%).   

Granted for his development, it probably is a good thing we're emphasizing walks with him right now.  If he can keep an above average walk rate without sacrificing a lot of contact down the road, you really could have an OBP monster, and with his speed, you could really have an exciting player if he keeps his walk rate and improves to a .280 or .290 batting average. 

But he's not going to be a very effective player in the future if he keeps striking out at a rate like that.  If all a speed guy like this is doing is looking to walk all the time, he's going to be falling in a lot of 0-2 and 1-2 counts and staring at a lot of strike three's because pitchers don't want to walk this guy on base.  If his approach doesn't change much, you're basically going to get the pretty underwhelming player that his .726 OPS says he is right now. 

As Theo likes to say, walks are the byproduct of having a good approach and having a good at bat but not the end goal of an at bat.  Hopefully with DeVoss, that's the kind of approach we're emphasizing with him, and down the road, his walks are the natural byproduct of having a great eye at the plate instead of something that appears to be artificially emphasized right now.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 08, 2012, 10:09:19 am
Cubs pleased with Soler's progress in ARL

Quote
With everything going well so far, the Cubs say a promotion out of the Arizona Rookie League is under consideration for the Cuba native, who made his nine-year, $30 million contract official on June 30.

McLeod admitted that a promotion could happen soon, although he gave no indication where the outfielder might be playing next. The logical route would be for him to go to short-season Boise in the Northwest League, with an outside chance he could eventually end up at Peoria before the end of the Midwest League season on Sept. 3.


http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/12533/cubs-pleased-with-solers-progress-in-arl?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter (http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/12533/cubs-pleased-with-solers-progress-in-arl?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 08, 2012, 10:12:17 am
I don't think walks are the goal, they are the byproduct of the goal which is being more selective at the plate.  If the pitch is in the hitting zone then the hitter should swing hard.  If not then selective hitters wait for that pitch which will result in more walks.  I have a hard time believing that the current philosophy emphasizes walking as an end result.

I agree with that, but I wonder if some players are becoming more selective at the plate when they shouldn't be. 

I think it's fair to say Jackson isn't having a lot of great at bats right now and a lot of his walks probably aren't the natural byproduct of having great at bats.  As weird as it is to say in the Cubs organization where we didn't seem to care if hitters had a hacker mentality or not, he might be a guy who probably needed to be told to be a little less selective at some point in his career and might need to be told that now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 08, 2012, 10:13:15 am
Peralta fans 14 in perfect-game bid

(http://www.milb.com/images/2012/08/07/qjbZYrwJ.jpg)

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120807&content_id=36307948&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb&tcid=tw_share (http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120807&content_id=36307948&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb&tcid=tw_share)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 08, 2012, 11:26:32 am
I'd be curious to see the stats on how many K's last night were "swinging K's on pitches out of the strike zone"?

Because it feels (felt?) like all of them were...once they got to 2 strikes, it was over. Throw it anywhere, they'll swing...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 08, 2012, 11:29:41 am
I was thinking yesterday about Jackson "K"ing so much.

A few years ago I didnt necessarily buy into the concept of working the count and such but Im a strong believer in it now so I dont really think I'd tell Brett Jackson just to go up there and be a hacker especially seeing that that's not his game.

I wonder if a leadoff specialist like Rickey Henderson or Tim Raines could help Brett.

It just seems to be like his approach needs a little more fine tuning.

Nothing that serious.

Just something that will take a little time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 08, 2012, 11:31:49 am
Maybe an eye doctor would help more than Henderson.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 08, 2012, 11:56:07 am
Prospect Pitch: McNutt makes best of it
Double-A Tennessee's power-armed righty bumped to bullpen

Quote
"I've got all the pitches. It's just a matter of throwing them for strikes on a consistent basis. That's the reason I'm in Double-A now," the Birmingham, Ala., native said, not long after playing in his 50th game for the Tennessee Smokies over the last three seasons. "When I get to where I can throw the pitches for strikes whenever I want to, I'll have it made."

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120803&content_id=36067420&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb (http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120803&content_id=36067420&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 08, 2012, 12:05:46 pm
I've heard reports that Jackson swings through some hittable pitches. It will be interesting to see what his swing data shows as he builds up a sample size
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 08, 2012, 02:04:02 pm
I've heard reports that Jackson swings through some hittable pitches. It will be interesting to see what his swing data shows as he builds up a sample size

I'm hoping it shows a correctable flaw since Sveum seems to think it's something that can be fixed at the major league level...seems unlikely, but he knows more than I.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on August 08, 2012, 02:08:00 pm
"Keep yer eye on the ball."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 08, 2012, 02:15:55 pm
"Keep yer eye on the ball."

Seriously, doesn't it seem like Jackson loses eye contact with the ball too early?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 08, 2012, 02:20:15 pm
Yes.  He pulls his head worse than I do at golf.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 08, 2012, 03:18:58 pm
That is one inept Iowa lineup:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_08_renaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 08, 2012, 04:18:41 pm
Jae-Hoon Ha activated from disabled list Wednesday

(http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7249/7674337870_52b7024674.jpg)

KODAK, Tenn. – The Tennessee Smokies, Class AA minor league affiliate of the Chicago Cubs, announce today that OF Jae-Hoon Ha has been activated from the disabled list in advance of tonight’s series opener against the Huntsville Stars at Smokies Park.  Ha will bat third and play centerfield for the Smokies in tonight’s 7:15 game.

Tennessee’s roster is at 25 active players, which is the Southern League maximum.

Ha, 21, was batting .266 (99-for-372) with 21 doubles, two triples, four home runs and 33 RBIs before being placed on the DL on July 27.  The Heweongu, South Korea native was selected to the World Team roster in the XM Satellite Radio All-Star Futures Game at Kauffman Stadium in Kansas City, Mo, last month.  Ha was signed by the Cubs as a non-drafted free agent in June 2009.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 08, 2012, 04:44:29 pm
I would like to see Bill Buckner work with Brett Jackson.

I wonder if a player like Jackson wouldn't benefit from an approach straight out of the Charlie Lau - Walt Hriniak school of hitting where balance, weight transfer and keeping your head down thru the point of contact are emphasized.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 08, 2012, 04:48:03 pm
I'm very glad to see Ha back to full health and playing again. He's likely to be one of our reserve outfielders down the road, but might have an opportunity to play every day for the Cubs for a while until Soler and Amora arrive (if they do). It will be interesting to see how the Smokies use Ha and Szczur.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 08, 2012, 05:12:12 pm
I bet Szczur is our CF of the future.

At least until Almora gets here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 08, 2012, 09:13:15 pm
10 Ks for Yao-lin Wang for Peoria tonight.  He's quietly putting together a pretty solid year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Keysbear on August 08, 2012, 09:57:42 pm
Ricketts visits Daytona

http://www.news-journalonline.com/sports/baseball/daytona-cubs/2012/08/08/chicago-cubs-owner-visits-jack.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 08, 2012, 10:20:51 pm
Apparently he's here in East Tennessee tonight.

Or maybe it was yesterday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 08, 2012, 11:15:15 pm
Geiger: 2-7, 2B, 3 RBI, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_08_peoafx_burafx_1


Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_08_hunaax_tenaax_1


Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2012, 12:25:25 am
Maples: 2-2-0-0-0-3, HB

Soler: 0-4, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_08_dodrok_cubrok_1


Vogelbach: 1-5, HR, 2 RBI

Amaya: 1-3, 2B, BB, SB, HBP

Arias: 5-4-3-3-2-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_08_boiasx_eveasx_1


DSL teams off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 09, 2012, 11:55:59 am

1m Bruce Miles ‏@BruceMiles2112
#Cubs promote OF Jorge Soler from Mesa to Peoria (A).
Expand
 Reply
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2012, 01:12:18 pm
Dang, that's a much bigger promotion than I was hoping for.  Soler is doing decently, but is hardly dominating the Arizona League.  I was hoping to see him go to Boise, but Peoria might be too much for him at this point.  I think it is important for a young super-prospect to be able to dominate, or at least be more than competitive in his league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 09, 2012, 01:33:07 pm
I like it.  The new brass is being aggressive in grooming their prospects.  I think teams are often too timid about putting their young players in situations where they're going to be challenged. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 09, 2012, 01:37:56 pm
Dang, that's a much bigger promotion than I was hoping for.  Soler is doing decently, but is hardly dominating the Arizona League.  I was hoping to see him go to Boise, but Peoria might be too much for him at this point.  I think it is important for a young super-prospect to be able to dominate, or at least be more than competitive in his league.

Two points:

1) The Theocracy may be convinced that Solar is in fact ready to dominate at Peoria.

2) The promotions of Vitters and Jackson suggest that the Theocracy might not agree with you (and me) about the importance of dominating a league before promotion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 09, 2012, 01:49:12 pm
You really can't tell anything about a player in Mesa anyway.  Basically those short season leagues are good for nothing other than getting a player's feet wet for pro baseball. 

He might not be totally up to speed for Peoria yet, but at the very least, we'll be able to get a lot better feel for where he is as a hitter and what weaknesses he might have playing in a full season league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2012, 03:50:16 pm
Two points:

1) The Theocracy may be convinced that Solar is in fact ready to dominate at Peoria.

2) The promotions of Vitters and Jackson suggest that the Theocracy might not agree with you (and me) about the importance of dominating a league before promotion.

Two points.  First, when someone criticizes a decision made by the front office, it doesn't add much to the conversation to say that the front office thought it was a good decision.  It would seem that, by definition, they wouldn't have made the decision if they thought it was the wrong one.

Second.  I never suggested that the current administration had to agree with me on anything.  That shouldn't stop me from putting forth my opinion, and I have not noticed that it has ever stopped you from the same thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 09, 2012, 03:54:21 pm
Soler's been a .717 OPS guy at Mesa, and 647 OPS over his last ten days. 

So performance-wise, he's been been more than challenged at Mesa. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2012, 03:56:24 pm
On the other hand, Puig has a 1.400+ OPS in the AZL.

We probably got the wrong Cuban.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 09, 2012, 04:30:41 pm
Two points.  First, when someone criticizes a decision made by the front office, it doesn't add much to the conversation to say that the front office thought it was a good decision.  It would seem that, by definition, they wouldn't have made the decision if they thought it was the wrong one.

Second.  I never suggested that the current administration had to agree with me on anything.  That shouldn't stop me from putting forth my opinion, and I have not noticed that it has ever stopped you from the same thing.

Was anyone trying to stop you from putting forth your opinion?  I know no one suggested that the current administration had to agree with you on anything, let alone everything.  And relatively few posts here add much to the conversation, and that includes both of your posts and both of my posts on this.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 09, 2012, 07:23:56 pm
On the other hand, Puig has a 1.400+ OPS in the AZL.

We probably got the wrong Cuban.

Maybe he's actually a Dominican with a Cuban band.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2012, 07:51:29 pm
Baez: 0-3, BB, SB, CS, K

Torreyes: 1-3, 2 RBI, BB, K

Villanueva: 1-1, SB, 2 BB, HBP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_09_lakafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2012, 10:01:31 pm
Vogelbach with another home run.  Time to bring him up to Peoria so I can watch him along with Soler on Saturday in Beloit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2012, 10:47:48 pm
Geiger: 2-4, 2 2B, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_09_peoafx_burafx_1


Szczur: 1-3, HR, RBI, SB, 2 BB

Struck: 7-2-1-1-1-7

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_09_hunaax_tenaax_1


Iowa idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2012, 10:52:01 pm
2nd homer of the night for Vogs.

For the love of god, someone find out if Rizzo can catch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 09, 2012, 10:52:37 pm
Daniel Vogelbach is gonna bring the Cubs a pretty good pitcher in a trade one day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2012, 10:57:43 pm
Law and Goldstein getting pilloried on Twitter for their recent Vogelbach comments.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2012, 11:02:06 pm
Pierce Johnson going to Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 09, 2012, 11:03:33 pm
Timothy Saunders strikeouts were under control in Mesa, but wow, he has really had some K problems as a 22 year old in A-ball.  He's got to have one heck of a high babip, so seriously doubt he'll be able to maintain his batting average.  Of course, small sample size, so k percentage could drop as he adjusts to pro ball and transitions toward a larger sample size. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 09, 2012, 11:06:15 pm
You really cant help but like Dan Vogelbach.

Is he really so fat he couldnt play RF?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2012, 11:12:25 pm
Daniel Vogelbach is gonna bring the Cubs a pretty good pitcher in a trade one day.

Rizzo might be the one that brings the pitcher in one day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on August 09, 2012, 11:13:55 pm
Vogelbach with 6 HR and this is his 15th NW league game. The league leaders (3 guys) have 8. 2 of those guys have played 50 games, and the 3rd is the #3 overall pick, Zunio (or whatever) who has played 25 games. So, yeah, promote him to Peoria so he and Soler can give us reason to watch Peoria visit Kane County or Beloit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2012, 11:15:50 pm
I doubt that Vogelbach would have much trouble playing left field.  That is traditionally where you put a very good hitter that has no other position.

Hank Sauer.  Ralph Kiner.  Keith Moreland. 

He certainly wouldn't be as bad as Soriano for the past few years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 09, 2012, 11:24:09 pm
Not sure about his other AB's tonight, but Vogelbach has 13 HR/27K/18 walks this season. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 09, 2012, 11:26:39 pm
He really needs to be at Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 09, 2012, 11:36:58 pm
Before Saturday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2012, 11:39:09 pm
Rodriguez: 5-2/3 -10-6-3-1-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_09_drorok_dcurok_2


Alcala: 2-3, 2 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_09_dcurok_drorok_1


DSL2:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_09_dptrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 09, 2012, 11:44:29 pm
Vogelbach: 2-4, 2 HR, 2 RBI, K

Amaya: 0-2, SF, RBI, BB, PO

Scott: 5-8-2-2-0-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_09_boiasx_eveasx_1



Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 12:17:07 am
We still have four years to figure out what to do at first base if this ever becomes a "problem".

And also as much as I like Vogelbach . . . it's still Boise.  You can look great there but get slowed down considerably when you get to Peoria or Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2012, 01:13:23 am
I think it's entirely possible Vogelbach could be a factor in the big club's plans in considerably less than four years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2012, 01:14:30 am
I think it is quite likely.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 02:00:15 am
Which club's?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 07:29:15 am
I think it's entirely possible Vogelbach could be a factor in the big club's plans in considerably less than four years.

Yeah there's probably a fairly decent chance of it. 

For me, though, I need to see how he handles a full season league before starting to think he could be in the majors at 21 or 22. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 07:32:21 am
Pretty much, beating the crap out of pitchers like Steve Ewing (20th round), Mark Bordonaro (25th round), and Brandon Plotz (47th round) doesn't mean you're going to race through the minors in 2-3 years. 

Certainly doesn't mean he won't, of course, but right now he's crushing just really really weak pitching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 10, 2012, 07:55:47 am
Ok Debbie :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 07:55:54 am
Well, nobody else in that league is really beating up weak pitchers.

There are only 5 players in the league hitting above .291.

The guy third in the league in OPS is at .872. The leader is Amaya at .912. Vogs' is 1.161.

The top 3 in total bases have 105, 102 and 101. The 4th guy has 85. Projected to the same AB's as that of the leader Vogelbach would have 154.

Compared to his peers, Vogelbach is mashing through an admittedly small portion of at-bats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 10, 2012, 08:31:53 am
I hope somebody finds video of last night's Vogelbombs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 08:35:06 am
Ok Debbie :)

Hahahaha, well all I'm saying is just exercise some caution before getting too excited about what goes on down there.  I'm definitely not saying he isn't for real or that he couldn't be a fast riser. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 10, 2012, 08:40:33 am
I know, just busting your chops. I appreciate being reminded that he's abusing crap pitchers.

It's gotta start somewhere though, and if he's smacking them aroun more than others, that says something.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 08:43:52 am
Some posts from a non-Cubs fan who was at the Boise game two nights ago via John Sickels' site:


Quote
Dan Vogelbach

Saw this kid in person tonight in Everett and he was impressive indeed. Went 1-5 with the “one” being a screaming liner down the line to right for a home run but, he squared up balls all night . . . a sizzling liner to the rightfielder for an out, a liner right to the 1b … both on good fastballs.

Not psysically (body-wise, running, throwing, etc he can maybe be described as a “scouts nightmare” lol) but, as a hitter, he reminds me some of my favorite ballplayer in the in minor leagues, Oscar Taveras, some. Like Oscar he is so excited, anxious, enthuisiastic and just plain good at barreling baseballs that he swings too hard ocasionally and still hits the ball hard anyways much of the time even then. When they stay within themselves though . . . its beauty. Vogs just has the same, rare ability to swing hard as hell, yet it isn’t a long swing and, a real skill for putting the barrel on the ball hard. I was impressed. I think I must go see him tomorrow.

Also, the Boise Hawks have several, good looking prospects . . . Amaya, Candelario, Marco Hernandez, Steve Bruno (reminds me of Jamie Carrol, good little ballplayer) and even Rock Shoulders. For Everett, Mike Zunino played great and, really has a aura and a calmness at the plate. It could be just his advantage in experience level but, he really stands out. He came up with the game on the line in the 9th and we just knew he would get a big hit. He drilled a ball to SS but, the kid Hernandez made a great play on the ball to end the ballgame.


Quote
He isn’t real quick and, he doesn’t throw well but, I saw him make a decent play on a hard hit ball. I think his coordination is good enough to be servicable, ie: not terrible. I’d have to see him play more to make a real fair assesment but, I have seen worse 1b-man at the big league level . . . Mo Vaughn, Frank Thomas, etc

It depends on how hard he works. I think as a bat-only guy he’ll ghet a lot of time to work on his defense in the minor leagues so, we’ll see.


Quote
My friend who I was with at the gameMy friend, who’s I do trust, would not stop talking about Gioskar Amaya. He looked like an advaced hitter, and a good athlete. His performance has been outstanding also.

I wish I had gone to the game tonight, Vogelbacvh hit two more Vogelbombs.


http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/8/8/3228445/8-8-milb-gameday-thread#111018733
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 10, 2012, 08:49:31 am
http://www.news-press.com/article/20120803/SPORTS01/308030023/Bishop-Verot-product-Vogelbach-hits-stride-baseball-minors

Recent article on Vogelbach with some commentary from Buckner.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 08:50:29 am
The guy responsible for the above comments also said he was impressed with Jose Arias in another post saying Arias had "longer, looser limbs and easier velocity" than another highly rated pitcher from that game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 10, 2012, 08:55:04 am
Interesting.  Sometimes leaderboards in short-season especially can be a bit misleading.  Not many guys who are producing big stay without being promoted.  So for leader listings of percentage-based stats that assume a minimum number of AB's, the best are self-deleting.  So a lot of the better guys who were crushing the 20th-round pitchers and Latins who are in their 3rd year in pro-ball are up in full-A by now.  Doesn't apply to volume stats, of course, like HR's. 

Vogelbach looks like a premium hitting prospect.  There are zero red-flags manifest thus far.  He's strong, no doubt.  He's got a very short swing, not some long-levered guy with tremendous force, but who struggles to make the contact.   (This is going to be the Soler question, will he be able to apply his long-limbed power often enough?)    Volgelbach goes with the pitch; he goes opposite way plenty, but he can go with the inside pitch and pull it too.  (I think there is lots of justified criticism for guys who pull too much, so going opposite-way is routinely viewed as praiseworthy.  But there seem to to be many players who lack true ability to go with any pitch, and end up going opposite a lot but "go" with the inside pitches and pull them.  That doesn't appear to be Vogelbach's issues.)  His K's are modest, his walks are good.  So there aren't any red flags that he's got recognition problems or that breaking balls are a mystery. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2012, 11:38:51 am
Pretty much, beating the crap out of pitchers like Steve Ewing (20th round), Mark Bordonaro (25th round), and Brandon Plotz (47th round) doesn't mean you're going to race through the minors in 2-3 years. 

Certainly doesn't mean he won't, of course, but right now he's crushing just really really weak pitching.

Caveat - small sample size.

Everyone in the Northwest league is facing the same level of pitching.  But Vogelbach is dominating at that level of pitching.

Certainly, short-season stats CAN BE totally misleading.  But one if the major reasons that they can be misleading - the player being much older than the league, does not apply to Vogelbach.

At that level, much more important than stats are scouting reports.  And all that I have seen on Vogelbach have been extremely high on his hitting, both for power and for average.

So far, not only are his primary numbers outstanding (average - home runs) been outstanding, but so have the peripherals that most use as warning signs (high walk rate - low strikeout rate)

Vogelbach will probably never reach the ceiling projected by the scouts.  But so far that has been no reason for pessimism beyond the fact that he belongs to the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 10, 2012, 11:42:18 am
When discussing the potential logjam at 1B in a few years is not farsighted.  Remember, Uncle Bud is pushing for standardization of the DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 10, 2012, 01:01:12 pm
Hey, in addition to the DH, let each team have five more DF's (Designated Fielders) and use a six-man batting order. That way, only three players on each squad would have to play on both offense and defense, games would feature plenty of offense and last four hours (sell more beer), and pitchers would be lucky to get through five innings. It works for the NFL!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 10, 2012, 01:05:05 pm
How did you know that was coming up at this winter's meetings?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 10, 2012, 01:19:41 pm
Hahahaha, well all I'm saying is just exercise some caution before getting too excited about what goes on down there.  I'm definitely not saying he isn't for real or that he couldn't be a fast riser.

~~~~pishhh.

I'm already booking a room in Cooperstown for his induction in 2037.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 10, 2012, 01:19:59 pm
Law and Goldstein getting pilloried on Twitter for their recent Vogelbach comments.

What did they say?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 01:21:37 pm
Quote
Everyone in the Northwest league is facing the same level of pitching.  But Vogelbach is dominating at that level of pitching.

I know that everyone is facing the same level of pitching and I know Vogelbach is dominating.  Still, it doesn't take a lot of great talent to dominate Boise. 

For instance, here's the list of players with 1.000+ OPS's in the Northwest League from 2000 to 2011 (Min. 75 AB, which Vogelbach has a good shot at getting).  Guys who eventually made the majors are bolded, and players in blue were Cub prospects who I'm sure we all remember:

Kevin Collins (2002), B.J. Cashman (2004), Chris Carter (2004), Taylor Teagarden (2005), Chad Huffman (2006), Josh Donaldson (2007), Clayton Conner (2007), Colin Cowgill (2008), Michael Ambort (2008), Kevin Rivers (2010), Michael Choice (2010), Cory Spagenberg (2011)

Obviously not a list full of future major league greats here.  The guys who did make the majors are role players and Quadruple-A players. 

You also have two recent first round picks with Michael Choice and Corey Spagenberg, but Choice right now has a .779 OPS in Double-A and Spagenberg has followed his 1.080 OPS in 2011 with .700 OPS in Single-A this season.  Obviously those two guys have stalled a little bit, and "dominating" the Northwest League wasn't a strong sign that they were going to dominate the rest of the way through the minors, even for players taken in the first round.

Granted Vogelbach will be the only teenager to make the list if he gets to 75 AB, and that probably adds more meaning to it.  And you guys thinking he's going to get to the majors in three years or less could be right. 

I guess what I'm saying here is add a little caution to high expectations like that because dominating this league doesn't mean you'll even be good at Peoria the following season.  Just ask Kevin Collins (.746 OPS in Peoria) and Josh Donaldson (.625 OPS in Peoria). 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 10, 2012, 01:38:32 pm
Debbie Downer Does Research!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 10, 2012, 01:38:42 pm
JK, JR
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on August 10, 2012, 02:00:58 pm
Feline AIDS is the number 1 killer of domestic cats.

Wah! Wah!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 02:28:38 pm
I know, I know, I know. 

Really, I don't want to put down Vogelbach, Amaya, or any of the other good prospects we have in Boise.  I mean Vogelbach has been really impressive in short season, and the guy's just 19.  Even being the resident Northwest League/Boise skeptic here, it's hard not to be impressed by that. 

Mostly, I do want to put down the Northwest League as a quality baseball league, though.  I think we'd all agree Peoria is a very low level of professional baseball.  Boise is a significantly lower quality league than even that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: mO on August 10, 2012, 02:37:19 pm
They never did catch that anthrax guy...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 10, 2012, 03:35:19 pm
Heh...that never gets old...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 10, 2012, 03:36:06 pm
~~~~pishhh.

I'm already booking a room in Cooperstown for his induction in 2037.

Save up...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2012, 06:02:54 pm
Cubs hiring Jaron Madison from Padres as new Scouting Director.  Wilken's empire gets even smaller.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 10, 2012, 06:46:15 pm
Peoria Chiefs ‏@peoriachiefs
With runners on corners, Soler grounds into a 5-2 fielders choice in first Chiefs at-bat. 1-0 Peoria mid 1st at Burlington.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 06:52:57 pm
Cubs hiring Jaron Madison from Padres as new Scouting Director.  Wilken's empire gets even smaller.

I thought we weren't allowed to hire anyone else from San Diego, but I guess that's not the case.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 06:55:20 pm
Quote
UPDATE: Paul Sullivan just tweeted, without expanding, that Wilken is expected to “stay with Cubs in expanded role.” It’s hard to see what possibility there is for an expanded role, given that he was just one step below Jason McLeod. Not to start a panic, but, Jason isn’t leaving, right? Maybe Wilken wants to move off of the amateur side and into an Assistant GM type role? This will be interesting.

UPDATE 2: Wilken is, indeed, moving off the amateur side of the game, at least formally. He’ll become a Special Assistant to President of Baseball Operations, Theo Epstein. Wilken is expected to get a contract extension, too. This is pretty much awesome – it’s adding to the already impressive stable of front office talent, without losing anyone.

http://www.bleachernation.com/2012/08/10/the-cubs-are-getting-a-new-scouting-director-jaron-madison-from-the-padres/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 06:56:45 pm
Sounds like Wilken will be having the same kind of role with the Cubs that Jim Hendry right now has with the Yankees.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 06:57:31 pm
Quote
No. 6 STARLING PERALTA, RHP, CUBS

Team: low Class A Peoria (Midwest)

Age: 21

Why He's Here: 1-0, 1.29, 7 IP, 2 H, 1 R, 1 HR, 1 BB, 14 SO

The Scoop: It took Peralta three years in the Dominican Summer League to show the Cubs enough to earn a visa to the States. It's taken him another two years to establish himself as a legitimate prospect, but these days Peralta has proven he's one to keep an eye on. He's still somewhat inconsistent, but what was once an 89-92 mph fastball is now a 92-94 heater that tops out near 96. His slider comes and goes, but on days like Tuesday it's a plus pitch. Clinton sure couldn't hit it, and Peralta put together one of the biggest strikeout nights (14) we've seen this year. His previous career high was eight.


Quote
No. 12    DAN VOGELBACH, 1B, CUBS

Team: short-season Boise (Northwest)

Age: 19

Why He's Here: .333/.429/1.000 (8-for-24), 6 R, 5 HR, 9 RBI, 4 BB, 7 SO
The Scoop: Scouts said Vogelbach's bat would have to carry him, and so far it has—and in a big way. The ultra-stout Vogelbach went deep in four straight games, including a pair of solo blasts last night against Everett to run his yearly total to 13 in just 39 games. (Note that he spent his first 24 games in the Rookie-level Arizona League.) He also has 32 extra-base hits in 161 at-bats this year, good for a rate of one every five at-bats. Possessing plus-plus raw power to all fields, Vogelbach has shred 30 pounds since high school and has proven he's ready to handle full-season ball next year. 


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613883.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 10, 2012, 07:15:34 pm
Jorge Soler's first Peoria AB

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SES5DTBwBsk&feature=player_detailpage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SES5DTBwBsk&feature=player_detailpage)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2012, 07:21:08 pm
Sounds like Wilken will be having the same kind of role with the Cubs that Jim Hendry right now has with the Yankees.

That coffee isn't gonna brew itself.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on August 10, 2012, 08:42:19 pm
Easing him off into another area....kind. Interesting in what this means. Maybe this guy can help ID and mainly develop some good kids in the next 10 yrs or so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 10, 2012, 09:01:53 pm
I know that everyone is facing the same level of pitching and I know Vogelbach is dominating.  Still, it doesn't take a lot of great talent to dominate Boise. 

For instance, here's the list of players with 1.000+ OPS's in the Northwest League from 2000 to 2011 (Min. 75 AB, which Vogelbach has a good shot at getting).  Guys who eventually made the majors are bolded, and players in blue were Cub prospects who I'm sure we all remember:

Kevin Collins (2002), B.J. Cashman (2004), Chris Carter (2004), Taylor Teagarden (2005), Chad Huffman (2006), Josh Donaldson (2007), Clayton Conner (2007), Colin Cowgill (2008), Michael Ambort (2008), Kevin Rivers (2010), Michael Choice (2010), Cory Spagenberg (2011)

Obviously not a list full of future major league greats here.  The guys who did make the majors are role players and Quadruple-A players. 

You also have two recent first round picks with Michael Choice and Corey Spagenberg, but Choice right now has a .779 OPS in Double-A and Spagenberg has followed his 1.080 OPS in 2011 with .700 OPS in Single-A this season.  Obviously those two guys have stalled a little bit, and "dominating" the Northwest League wasn't a strong sign that they were going to dominate the rest of the way through the minors, even for players taken in the first round.

Granted Vogelbach will be the only teenager to make the list if he gets to 75 AB, and that probably adds more meaning to it.  And you guys thinking he's going to get to the majors in three years or less could be right. 

I guess what I'm saying here is add a little caution to high expectations like that because dominating this league doesn't mean you'll even be good at Peoria the following season.  Just ask Kevin Collins (.746 OPS in Peoria) and Josh Donaldson (.625 OPS in Peoria).

Kevin Collins was 21 at the time, and had 14 walks ad 52 Ks in his 209 AB.

B.J. Cashman was 24.

Chris Carter was 21.

Taylor Teagarden  was 21.

Chad Huffman was 21.

Josh Donaldson was 21.

Clayton Conner was 20.

Colin Cowgill was 22.

Michael Ambort was 23.

Kevin Rivers was 21.

Michael Choice  was 20.

Cory Spagenberg was 20.

You really want to compare Vogelbach to 24 year olds?

And do you really think Vogelbach would not do appreciably better at Boise even just one year from now, when he is 20?

Downplaying his age seems to be ignoring a very important factor in evaluating the significance of his performance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2012, 09:31:15 pm
By the way.  Vogelbach in his first at bat tonight.

Home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2012, 09:32:23 pm
1-4 with 2 RBI for Soler tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 10, 2012, 09:32:56 pm
I'm not impressed.  JR told me not to be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 09:34:48 pm
Soler: 1-4, 2 RBI

Jensen: 5 IP, 6  R

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_10_peoafx_burafx_1


Szczur: 2-4, 3B, RBI, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_10_hunaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 09:36:06 pm
Vogelbach's future suitors are salivating at the thought.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 09:39:27 pm
I'm not impressed.  JR told me not to be.

Hey I didn't say not to be impressed.  Just be mindful of who he's doing this against and that tearing up this league isn't a great indicator of being able to tear up even Single-A right away.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2012, 09:42:27 pm
I don't know of anyone that has been saying that Vogelbach's stats alone are reason for excitement.  But the scouting reports COUPLED with his performance COUPLED with his peripherals are all pointing in the same direction.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 09:45:14 pm
Mejias: 4-3-3-1-2-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_10_dcurok_dtwrok_1


DSL2:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_10_dphrok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 09:50:17 pm
I don't know of anyone that has been saying that Vogelbach's stats alone are reason for excitement.  But the scouting reports COUPLED with his performance COUPLED with his peripherals are all pointing in the same direction.

I think that's definitely a good point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 10, 2012, 09:56:09 pm
Vogelbach with his second HR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 10, 2012, 09:58:03 pm
Vogelbach's future suitors are salivating at the thought.

Indeed.

Personally, I'm pulling for the DH to be implemented across the board.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2012, 09:58:23 pm
Nuff.  Like all prospects.  The odds are that he will not reach his potential, just as just about every prospect does not reach his potential.  But the odds seem to look better for him right now than for, say, Saunders, who put up even better numbers in Mesa, but was old for the league, and scouting reports indicated that his bat speed were not likely to play well at higher levels.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 09:58:36 pm
I guess if Babe Ruth can be traded so can Daniel Vogelbach. The Cubs have already used up their curse anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 09:58:49 pm
I think one thing that's definitely fair to say is that these guys aren't challenging Vogelbach at all.  It'll definitely be interesting to see if he gets a promotion to Peoria soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 10, 2012, 09:59:50 pm
I don't know of anyone that has been saying that Vogelbach's stats alone are reason for excitement.  But the scouting reports COUPLED with his performance COUPLED with his peripherals are all pointing in the same direction.

Add in age relative to league and also having the drive and commitment to lose LOTS of weight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2012, 10:08:58 pm
Vogelbach with his second at bat.

And his second home run.


Screw that little snot JR.  I'm going to get excited.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 10:17:55 pm
I'd be excited if I thought he'd ever wear a Cubs uniform. As it is, it's just more disappointment.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2012, 10:23:15 pm
It really seems pointless to leave Vogelbach in Boise until he eventually gets so bored with pitching that doesn't challenge him that he goes into a slump.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 10:23:38 pm
Nuff.  Like all prospects.  The odds are that he will not reach his potential, just as just about every prospect does not reach his potential.  But the odds seem to look better for him right now than for, say, Saunders, who put up even better numbers in Mesa, but was old for the league, and scouting reports indicated that his bat speed were not likely to play well at higher levels.

Yeah I agree with that.  The biggest reason why I'm bringing all of this stuff up anyway is because I just think it's at least a little premature to get bent out of shape worrying about what to do with Rizzo and Vogelbach down the road, talking about moving Vogelbach to LF (which I'm sure 99% of professional baseball people would say would be a terrible idea), or getting all depressed about having to trade him down the road, when Vogelbach is only in Short Season-A and facing really lousy competition.

At the very least wait until he's facing full season pitchers instead of the lousy pitchers in short season leagues before getting worked up about all of that.  More than likely, we have plenty of time and years before having to sort out any of this, and 95% of the time, potential "problems" like this resolve themselves without having to do anything too drastic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 10:27:25 pm
Quote
and 95% of the time, potential "problems" like this resolve themselves without having to do anything too drastic.

Can you think of a non-drastic way to resolve this if Voglebach turns out to be a legit?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 10, 2012, 10:34:56 pm
Move him to LF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 10:38:43 pm
Can you think of a non-drastic way to resolve this if Voglebach turns out to be a legit?

Sure, trade one of them for an equally good player.  It's not a thing to get depressed about.

If Rizzo turns out to be a multiple time All-Star franchise player, then we're going to be extremely thrilled with that, and we should get an outstanding player in return in a trade if Vogelbach continues to hit.  That's a very positive thing.

If Rizzo turns out to be "merely" a good but not great first baseman and if Vogelbach emerges as a blue chip hitting prospect, we'll likely be looking at trading Rizzo to make room for Vogelbach.  After all, by time Vogelbach is likely to be ready for the majors, that's when Rizzo will start getting expensive.  It'll be a good baseball move to trade an "ordinary" and increasingly pricey player in Rizzo in this case to make room for an elite hitting prospect like Vogelbach.  (Remember, this is what the Phillies did with Jim Thome to make room for Ryan Howard.)  This scenario would also be a very positive thing.

Also, there's the likely Cub scenario that Vogelbach's short season heroics turn out to be a little bit of a mirage and that Rizzo only winds up having an Adam LaRoche type career, in which case, we don't have anything drastic to worry about here either except watching more bad Cubs teams in the future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 10:45:58 pm
You're making a mighty big assumption that the Cubs would get equal value in any trade for Vogelbach or Rizzo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 10:46:29 pm
Baez: 0-5, 3 K   ( 2-22, 8 K's )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_10_dunafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 10:54:16 pm
You're making a mighty big assumption that the Cubs would get equal value in any trade for Vogelbach or Rizzo.

No I'm not.  I think we talked about this one a while back, but Yonder Alonso was blocked in Cincinnati and got included in a trade for Mat Latos.  Jonathan Singleton was blocked in Philadelphia, and he got included in a trade for Hunter Pence.  It's not quite equivalent here since he wasn't getting blocked, but also remember Hee Seop Choi got traded for Derrek Lee straight up.

When looking at it on the other side, the Phillies got Gio Gonzalez and Aaron Rowand in return for Jim Thome when they needed to make room for Ryan Howard. 

If you trade good players, you usually should expect to get good players in return.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 10:56:40 pm
I imagine if Rizzo eventually turns into a solid but short of franchise caliber player, he'll still get a very good return in a trade considering he'll probably still have 2-3 years of club control left if we feel like we need to trade him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 10:59:24 pm
Why would the Cubs trade a solid player in Rizzo? He's likely only to be moved if he fails.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2012, 11:08:43 pm
On the contrary, I think that 99% of professional baseball people would have no problem at all playing Vogelbach in left field, if for whatever reason he could not play first base, and if he is seen as a 40 HR, .300 BA hitter.

Or - they could move Rizzo to left field.

I can't think of any great hitter in the history of baseball that wasn't fit into the line up somewhere.

But I agree with JR in that it is silly to worry about what may or may happen 4 years down the line.  But I'm not sure how many on the board were really "worried".  To me, it sounded like idle speculation.

By the way, in his third at bat, Vogelbach took a lousy walk.  No one walks to the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 11:09:39 pm
Why would the Cubs trade a solid player in Rizzo? He's likely only to be moved if he fails.

Because it's a good baseball move to trade a good but not great player who will be getting expensive when you have a blue chip, can't miss prospect coming up behind him. 

If Rizzo's short of being a multiple time All-Star franchise player and if Vogelbach is coming along hitting Vogelbombs right and left, trust me there's going to be a lot of pressure on the Cubs to move Rizzo to make room for Vogelbach. 

And Theo will probably go along with it because it'd simply be the right baseball move to make.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2012, 11:16:08 pm
Having too many good young players at the same position is a problem any GM would love to have.  If we're lucky enough to have it happen with Rizzo and Vogelbach, it's certainly nothing to be depressed about.  Either Vogelbach can move to LF or he can be traded, and there's no reason you couldn't get fair value for him if he develops into an elite hitting prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 11:20:17 pm
Quote
Because it's a good baseball move to trade a good but not great player who will be getting expensive when you have a blue chip, can't miss prospect coming up behind him. 

Good major league players are more sure things than prospects no matter how blue chip they may be. Teams usually don't make those kinds of trades unless they're bad teams in small markets. Rizzo's a Theo/Hoyer fave. He'd have to flame out for that to happen, IMO.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 11:21:29 pm
If Volgelbach ever plays left field I'll send everyone on this website a blank check.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 11:29:02 pm
Good major league players are more sure things than prospects no matter how blue chip they may be. Teams usually don't make those kinds of trades unless they're bad teams in small markets. Rizzo's a Theo/Hoyer fave. He'd have to flame out for that to happen, IMO.

We'll see how things work out either way.  We probably have at least three years to figure this one out, though, and a lot can happen even over three years.

Still, I don't see Theo settling for "solid but not spectacular" if Vogelbach is hitting Vogelbombs all the way up the minors.  Also, while Rizzo might be a Theo favorite, don't forget he's traded him once before.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 11:32:38 pm
Vogelbach's faltering anyway. He's only walked and singled since his two homers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 10, 2012, 11:33:06 pm
If Volgelbach ever plays left field I'll send everyone on this website a blank check.

I will 100% agree with this one, though.  Playing Vogelbach in LF is one of those fun things to talk about on a message board, but just about anyone in pro baseball will strike that idea down in half a second.  Heck, there are still plenty of pro baseball people who think Vogelbach will have trouble playing passably at first base.

BTW moving unathletic guys to LF because you don't have any room for them doesn't always work out.  The Reds tried that with Yonder Alonso last year, and it was a disaster.  Also anyone remember how disastrous Todd Hundley was in LF when they tried him there to make room for Mike Piazza? 

No chance Vogelbach will ever be a regular major league player in LF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 10, 2012, 11:35:59 pm
Vogelbach's decline continues.  Now he has been limited to a lousy single.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 11:43:30 pm
Goldstein and Law still trying to fend off people as a result of their claims that Vogelbach wasn't ready for a promotion to Boise. Sometimes the "experts" would be better off just saying they don't know rather than answering definitively.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2012, 11:54:29 pm
Lots of people said Prince Fielder could never play an adequate 1B, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 11:55:56 pm
You can stick just about anyone at 1st. Hell, Prince's father was far more immobile than he is.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 10, 2012, 11:57:32 pm
Underwood: 1-0-0-0-2-0, WP

Almora: 1-4, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_10_rngrok_cubrok_1


Chapman: 1-2/3 -2-1-1-2-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_10_iowaaa_lvgaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 10, 2012, 11:59:18 pm
The point is, just because he's fat doesn't mean he can't play 1B - even if JR has to dig deep to insinuate that to cover his Vogelhate.  Most scouts seem to think Vogelbach can handle 1B fine defensively as he is now, and who knows, maybe he'll drop another 30 pounds by the time he's in the high minors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 11, 2012, 12:03:49 am
The point is, just because he's fat doesn't mean he can't play 1B - even if JR has to dig deep to insinuate that to cover his Vogelhate.  Most scouts seem to think Vogelbach can handle 1B fine defensively as he is now, and who knows, maybe he'll drop another 30 pounds by the time he's in the high minors.

I imagine Vogelbach will figure it out well enough at 1B to be able to play there.  I was just saying if scouts think he's going to have to work hard to even be passable at 1B, you can pretty much forget about LF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 12:07:14 am
As I said this morning JR, the NWL has been an extreme pitcher's league this year. There is little offense anywhere to speak of. The one other hitter who has crushed the league's pitching is Mike Zunino and yet even the 3rd pick in the draft and college junior hasn't been as good as Vogelbach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 11, 2012, 12:16:35 am
sorta ironic that Hendry's last draft may turn into the core of the 2016-2017 Cubs world series winning team....makes you wonder how different things would have been if Zell/Tribune had let him spend big on the draft every year.  (yes i realize there were drafts they spent more money on than others)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 11, 2012, 12:18:28 am
why are there never any good 19 year olds in the nwl?  I guess they just generally skip that level?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 11, 2012, 12:31:33 am
Vogelbach's at what 230 now and he's in low A ball.

That should give him 3-4 years to lose another 20 pounds or so to make him an adequate LFer by the time he gets to Chicago.

If he wants to lose that weight he will.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 11, 2012, 12:33:29 am
Forget it.  Vogelbach just struck out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 12:34:56 am
Vogelbach's 255.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 12:53:51 am
Amaya: 0-2, 3 BB, K

Candelario: 3-5, 2 2B, 2 RBI, 2 E

Vogelbach: 3-4, 2 HR, 5 RBI, BB, K

Hernandez: 2-5, HR, 2 RBI  (15-game hit-streak)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_10_boiasx_eveasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 03:36:15 am
Quote
The 2011 third-round Draft pick said there isn't any one key to his power surge, attributing it to a laid-back approach that keeps him grounded and relaxed at the plate.

"I've just been trying to be patient at the plate, get good pitches, not chase any and let the ball come to me," he said. "Recently, I've been slowing it down and letting the game come to me. It's felt pretty good, but most of all we're starting to win, and that means to the most to me. It's a good streak right now. Hopefully, we keep it going."

......

"I try to pride myself on being a complete hitter, not just a power hitter," he said. "I want to hit for average, limit strikeouts as much as I can, get walks, see pitches and get in hitter's counts. If I do that, the homers will come. I don't want to be that guy that hits 30 homers and hits .220."


http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120811&content_id=36504558&vkey=news_l126&fext=.jsp&sid=l126
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 11, 2012, 03:41:27 am
If he is 255 then his weight probably is a big enough issue to keep him out of the OF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2012, 04:33:26 am
Good major league players are more sure things than prospects no matter how blue chip they may be. Teams usually don't make those kinds of trades unless they're bad teams in small markets. Rizzo's a Theo/Hoyer fave. He'd have to flame out for that to happen, IMO.

Between Theo and Hoyer they have traded Rizzo twice now.

Favorite he might be.

Beyond trading him they are not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2012, 04:33:34 am
It really seems pointless to leave Vogelbach in Boise until he eventually gets so bored with pitching that doesn't challenge him that he goes into a slump.

It seems even more pointless to think Vogelbach would likely become bored with Boise after 16 games.

But another thing to keep in mind is that he is just 19 years old and that in Boise the Cubs match players up with host families who help kids with the transition to being on their own, and that if he is promoted to Peoria, he will in fact pretty much BE on his own.  Moves from Boise to Peoria apparently often look pretty hard at whether a prospect has shown the emotional maturity and has yet developed the personal life habits which will allow him to succeed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2012, 04:46:21 am
Vogelbach's at what 230 now and he's in low A ball.

That should give him 3-4 years to lose another 20 pounds or so to make him an adequate LFer by the time he gets to Chicago.

If he wants to lose that weight he will.

Writing off players who weigh more than 210 pounds as LFers because of their weight makes as much sense as writing off corner OFers because they are not 30 HR hitters.  No one with any sense would write off corner OFers just because they aren't 30 HR hitters.... oh, yea.  I forgot.  That was jiggs, too.

Count me among those absolute crazies who belief the best way to tell whether someone can handle LF is to put him in LF in the minors and see if he can do the job there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 05:29:46 am
Quote
Between Theo and Hoyer they have traded Rizzo twice now.

That's true but they also traded him as a prospect. In the scenario we are talking about Rizzo would be a good major league player. Are they going to move a good Rizzo just because Vogelbach is behind him and hypothetically killing the minors? I doubt it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 11, 2012, 05:51:42 am
"Watcha up to, Norm?"

"My perfect weight, if I was 9 feet tall."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2012, 06:35:51 am
That's true but they also traded him as a prospect. In the scenario we are talking about Rizzo would be a good major league player. Are they going to move a good Rizzo just because Vogelbach is behind him and hypothetically killing the minors? I doubt it.

Yes, they have traded his when he was a prospect with what was seen as virtually unlimited potential.

You have contended that if as a major league he establishes himself as solid, but not spectacular they would not trade him.  So you seem them as more likely to trade him (since they have twice) when he could well be a franchise player for a decade than if he establishes himself as solid, but not really a franchise player.

That would suggest a love for him far beyond what he might offer on the field, but perhaps some sort of man-crush, which would seemingly have been dis-spelled by the fact that they have between them traded him away twice.

Sorry, Chris, but your thinking on this genuinely seems clouded.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 07:20:17 am
Quote
they have traded his when he was a prospect with what was seen as virtually unlimited potential.


He wasn't seen as having virtually unlimited potential. For example, the highest BA ever rated him was 47th overall. Rizzo was not lauded as a Trout or Harper type prospect.

In the minors he was a good prospect. If he establishes himself as a good ML player, that's something entirely different. Teams rarely move young, solid MLers unless they are small-market teams. That's why I think Rizzo will have to all but completely bust for the Cubs to move him to make way for Vogelbach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2012, 07:56:43 am
Teams rarely move young, solid MLers unless they are small-market teams.

Teams move solid young MLers quite routinely, particularly when they are not seen as becoming much more than solid.  Do you need a list?  And if so, do you want to tell me which teams you won't consider illustrating the point because they are in your view small market?

And saying Rizzo, or any other prospect was never rated higher than 47th has as much to do with the expectation of reaching that prospect's ceiling as it does to the ceiling.  The perception of Rizzo's ceiling has not changed since he was drafted.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 08:22:43 am
Quote
The perception of Rizzo's ceiling has not changed since he was drafted.

So now you're claiming Rizzo was seen as having a "virtually unlimited potential" since he was drafted. I'm not even going to waste my time asking you to back that up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 11, 2012, 08:24:05 am
Rizzo would be the one to move, if needed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2012, 08:50:32 am
Rizzo would be the one to move, if needed.

Perhaps.

It makes no more sense to flatly state that Rizzo would be the one who would be moved than it does to flatly state that Rizzo would not be the one who would be moved.

Somehow I suspect that if the situation ever presents itself, the performance, attitude and character of each of them might be shown a bit more clearly by that time (at the very least two years from now, and more likely at least three), and I further suspect that what other teams might offer for each of them might somehow fit into the equation.

One thing which I believe clearly would NOT fit into the equation is any sort of "man-crush" either Theo or Hoyer might have had for Rizzo in the past.... when each of them showed a complete willingness to weigh the advantages and disadvantages and to trade him when a favorable deal offered itself.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 11, 2012, 08:57:28 am
Everett, Washington is at sea level.

Boise is 2842'.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 11, 2012, 10:15:02 am
Fact Check: I gather someone said that Theo/Jed had traded Rizzo twice now.  How is that?

It's true that Theo traded Rizzo to Jed once and that Jed has traded for Rizzo twice (once from Theo and the Red Sox and once after Jed joined the Cubs).  Am I missing something?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 11, 2012, 10:28:35 am
Fact Check: I gather someone said that Theo/Jed had traded Rizzo twice now.  How is that?

It's true that Theo traded Rizzo to Jed once and that Jed has traded for Rizzo twice (once from Theo and the Red Sox and once after Jed joined the Cubs).  Am I missing something?

The comment (mine) was actually that between the two of them, Theo and Hoyer have twice traded Rizzo.... and since Hoyer had already joined the Cubs before the Padres traded Rizzo for Cashner, that comment was rather clearly wrong.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 11, 2012, 11:40:22 am

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120811&content_id=36504558&vkey=news_l126&fext=.jsp&sid=l126

Third round draft choice?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: grrrrlacher on August 11, 2012, 12:08:33 pm
"Watcha up to, Norm?"

"My perfect weight, if I was 9 feet tall."

What's shakin Norm?

All 4 cheeks and a couple of chins.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 11, 2012, 12:26:41 pm
Third round draft choice?

Yeah, 2nd-rounder - though it would have been much more apt for him to be a sandwich pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 11, 2012, 01:55:43 pm
Paul Sullivan ‏@PWSullivan
Jake Brigham, starter acquired from Texas in Soto deal, already on Double-A Tenn's DL with arm issues.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 03:50:27 pm
Quote
Jason McLeod, the Cubs’ vice president of scouting and player personnel, says Vogelbach has a chance to hit himself out of rookie ball before the season is over.

“He’s has a tremendous half season so far after starting in extended spring,’’ McLeod said. “He’s big, strong. You can see what (the Cubs’ scouts) saw in him last year when they took him (in the second round of the draft). He’s got a chance to really create some havoc. … If he continues at this pace he might force the issue (on another promotion).’’ 


http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/chi-vogelbach-on-home-run-tear-20120811,0,2611036.story
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 11, 2012, 04:48:15 pm
You cant help but like a fat kid that can hit the **** out of it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 11, 2012, 05:07:36 pm
Get Engleberg to Peoria already.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 11, 2012, 05:25:23 pm
Who is Engleberg, and why should he go to Peoria?
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 11, 2012, 05:37:00 pm
"Whaddya mean, biscuits and coleslaw are extra?!"
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 08:00:51 pm
Szczur: 2-3, BB, Assist    ( 9-24, 2B, 3 3B, HR, 4 BB, last 6 games )

Zych: 2-0-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_11_hunaax_tenaax_1


Daytona rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: sam hannam on August 11, 2012, 08:09:30 pm
Soler hit a Grand Slam in the third inning for Peoria.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 08:18:35 pm
You can't really see much but here's Soler's homer:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ep_1hVdmcWA&feature=plcp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 11, 2012, 08:23:19 pm
Was Davep there?  He promised.  But, of course.  It's Davep.  He promises a lot of things.  Like intelligent commentary.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 11, 2012, 10:00:14 pm
I hope that isn't footage from Theo's spy cam.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 10:21:29 pm
Soler: 1-4, GS, 4 RBI, IBB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_11_peoafx_belafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 11, 2012, 10:54:41 pm
Vogelbach: 1-4, RBI, 2 K

Johnson: 2-4-1-1-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_11_skvasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 12, 2012, 12:00:11 am
Just got back from Beloit.  Soler is a big guy, and a lot faster than I thought he would be.  Also, he has a very strong arm, certainly strong enough for right field, if that is where he ends up.

But his forte is power, and he showed that off with a long home run over the center field fence.  With the bases loaded, nonetheless.

The rest of the day was mostly ground outs.  One hit quite hard and the others not so much.  One was to first base, and the others to short or third.  Although he seemed as if he might have been trying to pull the ball, he didn't look like a hacker, working the count, and only swinging at two pitches that I thought were out of the strike zone.

His physique and general appearance reminded me of Andre Dawson.

Cates was wild, and not very good, at least today.  McDonald was the best pitcher out there, showing good command on what looked like two different breaking pitches.  I didn't have access to a radar gun, but he looked reasonably fast.

Suarez was certainly faster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2012, 12:06:37 am
Almora: 3-5, RBI

Prieto: 3-1-1-1-1-3, 3 WP, HB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_11_angrok_cubrok_1


Alcala: 1-4, SF, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_11_dtwrok_dcurok_1


DSL2:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_11_dchrok_dphrok_1


Iowa suspended.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2012, 01:14:28 am
John Sickels post on Vogelbach:

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/8/11/3236341/minor-league-prospect-dan-vogelbach-1b-chicago-cubs-scouting-report


And in the comment section more from the guy who watched Vogelbach this week:

Quote
I will mention this

. . I went to see him in Everett, Wa, on both Wendesday and Friday (he homered twice on Thursday) and, it isn’t a great hitting environment. He really, really stood out even besides the three bombs I saw him hit. He hit three more ball really hard on Wednesday and a another one on Friday.

The homer on Wednesday was off Victor Sanchez, and the two on Friday were off a kid named Ambioras Hidalgo, who doesn’t look like a great prospect but he did throw 91 . . . and he completely turned that one around.

I was completely impressed with Mike Zunino and his overall game but, I have no problem thinking Vogelbach is a much higher ceiling hitter. He was impressive both in his raw power and as just a pure hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 12, 2012, 01:20:56 am
I love Vogelbach's swing.  Quick, short, easy power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 12, 2012, 01:33:03 am
This video is of a Soler HR, but check out the runner on base: it's Vogelbach. Watch until the very end of the clip for a clear view. Shows just how much weight he's lost since his HS days. He's not a ballerina or anything, but it's clear he's lost a LOT of weight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T28jvA92Wvo
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2012, 05:05:30 am
Vogelbach has changed his stance since that clip from Sickels' site. He's more open and has a leg bend now. Buckner talked about it in a piece that Tico posted recently.

BTW, here are Saturday's highlights:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiFtXTaIpeA&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2012, 05:11:51 am
Piece on what Vogelbach's brought to the Hawks:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/08/12/2228652/vogelbachs-winning-attitude-lifting.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 12, 2012, 07:38:52 am
The Hawks return home with Vogelbach having hit seven homers in five games and only 2,702 fans show up?  The stadium in Boise is that bad?

In Chris' clip of last night's highlights, Mike Safford pronounces his name Vogel-BACK.  I always assumed it was Vogel-BOCK.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 12, 2012, 08:28:47 am
Almora's got his OPS up to .700 now. 

I find it kind of interesting to see how Almora/Correa/Buxton do, after their pre-draft scouting.  Almora seems to fit his scouting report:  a contact hitter who doesn't walk, doesn't have much current power, and doesn't have SB speed.  He's a singles hitter with IsoD around .20 and IsoP around .120 or so.  His last eight hits have been singles. 

Buxton's performance (small sample) doesn't match what I expected based on his scouting stuff.  He scouted as a speedster, with power potential but only a couple of HS HR's this season.  But he's only 5/8 in terms of SB, but already has 4 HR's and 13 of his 24 hits are for XB.  And he's walked a bunch.  So his OPS is well ahead based on impressive IsoP and IsoD, even though his average is modest and he K's. 

Correa scouted as the mega-power guy, and he's hit two HR's and shown solid XBH power.  But while his walk-rate isn't Almora-low, 37K/7BB isn't good. 

Will be interesting to see how these guys go.  Will Amora's IsoP and IsoD grow enough? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 12, 2012, 08:36:36 am
The Hawks return home with Vogelbach having hit seven homers in five games and only 2,702 fans show up?  The stadium in Boise is that bad?

Isn't 2,700 a pretty good crowd for short season A ball?  Capacity at that stadium is around 3,450, so it was almost 80% full.

Vogelbach may be exciting for Cubs fans who follow their minor league system closely.  But I would guess there aren't 2,700 people in Boise who have even heard of him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 12, 2012, 08:47:39 am
The Hawks return home with Vogelbach having hit seven homers in five games and only 2,702 fans show up?  The stadium in Boise is that bad?

Looks kind of dumpish to me.  I think I've read where the Cubs would really like Boise to get a new stadium.

http://www.charliesballparks.com/st/ID-Boise-Memorial.htm (http://www.charliesballparks.com/st/ID-Boise-Memorial.htm)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 12, 2012, 09:30:04 am
with blue turf
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on August 12, 2012, 09:51:33 am
Thanks for the info on Soler and Peoria, DaveP. 
Thanks also for the Voglebach stuff, guys.
Things will get increasingly interesting for the organization from here...ups and downs, for sure, but trending in the right direction.
Finally, for the FIRST time in our lifetimes, Cubs are going about building in the right way!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 12, 2012, 09:52:12 am
Quote from: Mike Safford
But where do the Hawks stand amongst other short-season teams in the MILB?  The team sits in sixth place among the Northwest League teams and 21st among the 34 short-season affiliates in attendance – ahead of towns like Great Falls, but behind Ogden, Billings, and even Idaho Falls.

http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/2012/07/29/a-look-at-attendance/ (http://boisehawksradio.mlblogs.com/2012/07/29/a-look-at-attendance/)


Should have been a sellout Saturday night.


Edit:  The link is a week old.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 12, 2012, 10:35:55 am
2,700 is a substantial turnout in a short season small town like Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 12, 2012, 10:38:59 am
Besides, people in Boise have other entertainment options such as baking potatoes, peeling potatoes, cutting potatoes into french fries, watching potatoes grow, etc.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 12, 2012, 10:41:36 am
Lol
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 12, 2012, 10:46:51 am
Vogelbach looks like he might be working his way to a Jason Giambi physique.  He looks kind of like a stouter Giambi.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 12, 2012, 11:51:56 am
RT @ChiTribRogers Cubs sign Seth McClung to AAA contract. Casey Coleman left last night w/shoulder pain.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 12, 2012, 11:57:36 am
Just for the record:  Boise is averaging 2,388 so 2,702 is nothing to write home about.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 12, 2012, 12:02:04 pm
RT @ChiTribRogers Cubs sign Seth McClung to AAA contract. Casey Coleman left last night w/shoulder pain.
McClung was 2-13, 6.36 with Nashville.  The scrap heap must be pretty small this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 12, 2012, 12:02:12 pm
RT @ChiTribRogers Cubs sign Seth McClung to AAA contract. Casey Coleman left last night w/shoulder pain.

This is where we are as a franchise - signing a guy who's 2-13 with a 6.36 ERA in the minors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 12, 2012, 01:34:10 pm
Quote
"He's a great locker room guy," teammate Stephen Bruno told the Idaho Statesman. "He just rubs off on everybody, and we all get along. That's been great for our team."

"It was a like a light switch turned on when he walked in," manager Mark Johnson told the paper. "He's all about winning and he has a very infectious personality that carries throughout the clubhouse."

"I've been seeing the pitches really, really well," Vogelbach told the Statesman. "I've been picking up off-speed pitches and I've been seeing the fastball really well."

I guess so. At Boise, Vogelbach has a line of .373/.432/.806 with 8 homers and 21 RBI in 17 games. He had 7 homers in rookie ball in Arizona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2012, 04:56:37 pm
Soler: 1-3, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_12_peoafx_belafx_1


Daytona DH cancelled.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 12, 2012, 07:08:29 pm
Szczur: 1-5, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_12_hunaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 12, 2012, 07:14:03 pm
The Smokies started a pitcher who had been in the Mexican League until today.  The pitching in the farm system is in shambles.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=594582
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 12, 2012, 07:23:29 pm
The Smokies started a pitcher who had been in the Mexican League until today.  The pitching in the farm system is in shambles.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=594582

No question about how bad it is, meaning there is little real hope for any starting rotation reinforcements from the farm in 2013.  I wonder whether it might be bad enough for the Cubs to take a real flier on a couple of young arms in the Rule 5 draft.  Draft them, run them out there all season long to take there lumps, and hopefully have a mid or back of the rotation starter out of them in 2015 or so, after (most likely) spending 2014 back in the minors and continuing to develop.

A team can't really do that the way the Cubs tried with David Patton in 2009 when it is actually hoping to be in the race, but 2013 is not going to see the Cubs even close to contention, and it appears management does not really expect otherwise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 12, 2012, 07:29:15 pm
Negrin was one of the Cubans that we signed last year.  He's been under Cub control all year. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 12, 2012, 09:10:29 pm
They did it this year with Lendy Castillo, and I would expect they will do it with anyone they thought was better than those in their system. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 12, 2012, 10:27:18 pm
I'm interested in Lendy Castillo.  I think he's got a pretty good fastball.  He was out of his league in the NL, and over his league in Mesa.  But I'm hoping he'll be a good match in AA for the next couple of weeks, and that he has some good winter experience.  He's still only 23, and has pitched little.  So he's still got time to improve his command and his offspeed. 

Question (perhaps for Az Phil):  how will options work on him?  Will the Cubs still get three full option years with him?   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ChadJ on August 12, 2012, 10:27:50 pm
I had Peralta between 91 and 95  on his fastball today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 13, 2012, 01:12:13 am
Craig, I'm almost sure he was never on the Phillies' 40-man roster. He wasn't eligible for the Rule 5 draft until 2010, his first year as a pitcher, when he pitched in the DSL and a Rookie League before appearing in one Short-Season A game. Nobody would have taken him then, so the Phillies wouldn't have needed to protect him. So he should still have three option years available.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2012, 01:27:06 am
Iowa GM 1:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_11_iowaaa_lvgaaa_1

Iowa GM 2:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_12_iowaaa_lvgaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2012, 01:30:40 am
Almora: 2-3, 2B, RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_12_cubrok_royrok_1


Vogelbach: 0-5, 3K

Amaya: 1-5, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_12_skvasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 13, 2012, 02:33:34 am
Almora up to .304 with a .749 OPS.  Baby steps.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 13, 2012, 07:14:48 am
Almora took his rare walk off a starting pitcher who faced five batters:  walk-walk-walk-HBP-walk. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 13, 2012, 08:02:24 am
Quote
Aug. 11 update: The Cubs have promoted Wilken to special assistant to president Theo Epstein and Hoyer. In his expanded role, Wilken will continue to evaluate players for the draft while also adding major league, professional and international scouting duties.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2012/08/madison-leaves-padres-for-cubs/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 13, 2012, 09:49:24 am
Boise Sunday highlights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLdvt2FA_-c&feature=player_detailpage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLdvt2FA_-c&feature=player_detailpage)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 13, 2012, 09:25:25 pm
Soler: 2-3, 2B

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_13_peoafx_belafx_1



Daytona & Tennessee off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 13, 2012, 09:28:17 pm
Soler seems to be adapting to Peoria fairly well in the early going.  Still no K's in 14 AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 13, 2012, 10:43:48 pm
Blackburn rough game again. 

Almora's got a couple of hits already, including a triple.  If he got another XBH tonight, he might get OPS up around .800 tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 13, 2012, 11:18:26 pm
Almora adds another single, up to .329 now, and I think over .800 OPS. 

Maples with 4 K's in two innings so far.  (I assume he's done, but who knows.) 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on August 14, 2012, 12:07:35 am
5 hits tonight for Almora, now at .347...triple and 5th SB.

Maples with 5Ks in 3 IP...one walk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 14, 2012, 12:15:24 am
Hayden Simpson (BS, 1)(L, 1-3)   0.1   6   8   6   1   0   

Worst Cubs first round pick or worst draft pick ever?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2012, 12:28:43 am
Almora: 5-6, 3B, SF, 3 RBI, SB, K

Dunston: 3-6, 3B, SF, 2 RBI

Maples: 3-2-0-0-1-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_13_cubrok_cinrok_1


Vogelbach: 0-3, BB, K

Candelario: 3-4, K, E

Arias: 6-6-2-2-0-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_13_skvasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 14, 2012, 12:32:12 am
Boise highlights (some great defense) but no low lights (Simpson)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOx8VZynPAk&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2012, 12:49:32 am
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_13_iowaaa_lvgaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2012, 12:51:25 am


Santana: 5-2-1-0-2-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_13_dchrok_dacrok_1


DSL1:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_13_dparok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2012, 03:40:27 am
Video from a Rangers fan that includes an Almora single and sliding catch on the track after a long run to left field.

http://rangers.scout.com/a.z?s=324&p=9&c=2&cid=1210588&nid=6207508&fhn=1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 14, 2012, 07:18:11 am
Hayden Simpson (BS, 1)(L, 1-3)   0.1   6   8   6   1   0   

And I was so excited when I read in that Idaho newspaper puff piece that Simpson had gained 3 mph on his fastball and was up to 92 mph too.  (purple)

Quote
Worst Cubs first round pick or worst draft pick ever?

I think you'd honestly have to say Simpson is probably one of the very worst first round picks in draft history.  When you make such a big reach and it's failed this badly, that's a historically bad draft pick.  It's probably a decent reason why Wilken was kicked upstairs recently.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 14, 2012, 08:06:46 am
Vogelbach has K'd 6 times in his last three games since his HR binge.  And he's got 21K/75AB in Boise.  Those are Brett Jackson-like K numbers. 

Just another reminder that what goes up must come down; that he's still plenty challenged even at Boise; and what a slim margin there is between success and failure as a hitter. 

Almora has gone 10 for 14 over his last three games. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 14, 2012, 08:23:00 am
In fairness to Wilken, though, if we're going to look at his legacy overall as scouting director with the Cubs, you do have a lot of positives.

• Jeff Samardzija is now looking like a legit front end of the rotation pitcher.
• Andrew Cashner was promising enough to be flipped for Anthony Rizzo, who looks like a real keeper.
• It's early, but the top of the 2011 draft class is looking really good right now.
• Darwin Barney has turned into a respectable player.
• Tyler Colvin has at least had a couple of respectable major league seasons, and there aren't many 2006 first round picks taken after him who have been clearly more productive.
• While it's still looking regrettable that we didn't draft Matt Weiters or Jarrod Parker in 2007, at least Josh Vitters is now looking like someone who could have a respectable major league career.

That's not to mention that Matt Szczur still looks promising, and it's still too early to give up on Brett Jackson.

If we had that to look back on and didn't have to remember that Hayden Simpson was a very spectacular failure or that taking Vitters #3 overall was at least a suboptimal pick, you could say Wilken had a very respectable draft record with us.

If you look at the flip side of Wilken's legacy, though . . .

• Hayden Simpson is probably one of the very worst first round picks in draft history.
• He passed on Matt Weiters and Jarrod Parker to take Josh Vitters with the #3 overall pick in 2007. 
• Late developing Jeff Samardzija right now looks like the only star quality player Wilken drafted between 2006 and 2010, and you need be able to draft stars in order to win.  (Although in fairness, Cashner did get traded for Rizzo, who looks like a potential star player.)
• Seven years after taking over as scouting director, Samardzija and Barney are the only two starting players for the Cubs whom Wilken drafted.

Obviously Wilken's legacy can still change depending on how well the 2011 class plays out and whether guys like Jackson, Vitters, and Szczur turn out to be good players or not. 

Probably the best way to term Wilken's legacy at this point is "mixed bag".


 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 14, 2012, 08:35:42 am
Vogelbach has K'd 6 times in his last three games since his HR binge.  And he's got 21K/75AB in Boise.  Those are Brett Jackson-like K numbers. 

Just another reminder that what goes up must come down; that he's still plenty challenged even at Boise; and what a slim margin there is between success and failure as a hitter. 

Be careful there craig, or you might be accused of being a Vogelhater. :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 14, 2012, 08:51:51 am
And I was so excited when I read in that Idaho newspaper puff piece that Simpson had gained 3 mph on his fastball and was up to 92 mph too.  (purple)

I think you'd honestly have to say Simpson is probably one of the very worst first round picks in draft history. 

It's a result of the Concepcion approach -- the Cubs aren't letting him thrown any of his great off-speed stuff.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 14, 2012, 09:58:50 am
Hayden Simpson has blown, but I don't think he is even the worst Cubs first rounder in my lifetime.  Earl Cunningham at #8 has to take the cake. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 14, 2012, 10:57:24 am
Not sure you can call Simpson the worst Cubs first rounder in history when we never got to see him pitch with his best stuff...whether the reason be mono, or some sort of never really diagnosed physical problem.  There have been plenty of guys like that in draft history.  Just because Simpson is a cubs mistake doesn't make him any more special.  Mark Pawelek is a bigger bust in my book as far as pitchers go in just the last decade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 14, 2012, 11:27:17 am
And let's not forget the immortal Ty Griffin.  Didn't the Cubs pick him just ahead of Robin Ventura?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2012, 12:13:43 pm
You don't usually offer an extension to a guy you are kicking upstairs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 14, 2012, 01:59:44 pm
Austin Kirk and Rubi Silva go from Tennessee to Daytona

RF Nelson Perez moves from Daytona to Tennessee

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2012, 02:27:55 pm
At least part of that is backwards.  Kirk and Silva are going from Daytona to Tennessee.

Is the Nelson Perez also backwards?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 14, 2012, 02:51:15 pm
At least part of that is backwards.  Kirk and Silva are going from Daytona to Tennessee.

Is the Nelson Perez also backwards?
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=l_trn&lid=111&sid=t553
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2012, 03:16:47 pm
Right.  Silva and Kirk are going from Daytona to Tennessee, not the reverse.

I am a little surprised that Kirk is being promoted.  He has had a solid season at Daytona, but not really outstanding.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 14, 2012, 03:23:02 pm
Yeah but I guess it doesn't hurt for Kirk to find out what's in store for him next season at Double-A a little early.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 14, 2012, 03:54:17 pm
Cubs top pick Albert Almora headed to Boise on Wed according to several reports on the Twitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2012, 04:03:37 pm
Screw Boise.  Get Almora and Vogelbach up to Peoria before they play in Wisconsin again.

Some things are more important than mere development.

While they are at it, get Paniagua and Pierce Johnson up there also.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 14, 2012, 05:11:00 pm
Almora could be a good illustration of a player who would appear to have suffered under the old prospect signing deadline schedules if he had signed at the deadline instead of signing early as he did this year.  This year he stands a very good prospect of clearly establishing that he has mastered the Northwest League, and, depending on how he does there, perhaps even getting another promotion to Peoria at the very end of the season, or at least persuading the Theocracy that for 2013 it would be pointless to start him in the Northwest League, and perhaps even to have them very seriously look at starting him in Daytona (depending on how well he does in spring training).

Considering his age, if he had delayed signing until the old deadline, and had not seen live action between HS and signing, he might well have seen the progress of his entire career delayed by a year, a delay which would do nothing to delay the time his age-related performance decline would begin.

This kind of delay could effectively reduce a player's overall career shelf-life by a full year, costing him millions of dollars.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2012, 06:04:56 pm
Playing this year could set back his time table, but not necessarily.  Some of a player's improvement over time comes through experience, but some of it certainly comes just through physical and mental maturity.

If he is to master the Northwest league, he better do it quickly.  There are only two and a half weeks left in the season.  But he is likely to get a cup of coffee at Peoria, who's season lasts three days longer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 14, 2012, 06:12:11 pm
Screw Boise. 

205,000 people in that town.  Could take a while.  Better get Jiggy to help.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2012, 06:36:22 pm
How many years are there in 205,000 weeks?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 14, 2012, 06:37:34 pm
More years than you got left, buddy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 14, 2012, 09:44:19 pm
Tayler Scott with another very good game in Boise.  5 innings, 4 hits, 0 runs.  No walks, but only one strike out.  He seems to get the job done without great peripherals.  His walks are not high, but certainly are not low.  His strikeouts are not high, but certainly not low.  He allows less than a hit an inning, but not a lot less.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2012, 09:47:27 pm
Torrez: 5-7-0-0-0-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_14_dacrok_dchrok_1


Emeterio: 1-4, 2 SB, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_14_dcurok_dparok_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2012, 10:27:12 pm
Szczur: 1-4, 2B, SB, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_14_tenaax_biraax_1


Daytona rained out again.

Peoria off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 14, 2012, 10:38:12 pm
When was the last time  Daytona actually played?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2012, 10:41:32 pm
Daytona hasn't played since Friday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 14, 2012, 10:43:11 pm
Amaya: 2-4, K

Candelario: 1-4, 2 RBI, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_14_skvasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 14, 2012, 11:17:51 pm
Tayler Scott with another very good game in Boise.  5 innings, 4 hits, 0 runs.  No walks, but only one strike out.  He seems to get the job done without great peripherals.  His walks are not high, but certainly are not low.  His strikeouts are not high, but certainly not low.  He allows less than a hit an inning, but not a lot less.
  His peripheral of Zero HR-allowed is good and is the key to why his ERA is so good when his K's and WHIP aren't that good.  I'm pretty shocked that he's been so effective.  Very encouraging.  I'd guess he might have a whole lot of untapped potential left. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 12:13:02 am
Boise highlights - including a safety squeeze

http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&v=H2_KuXEVvMI&feature=player_detailpage#t=0s (http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&v=H2_KuXEVvMI&feature=player_detailpage#t=0s)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 15, 2012, 12:22:05 am
  His peripheral of Zero HR-allowed is good and is the key to why his ERA is so good when his K's and WHIP aren't that good.  I'm pretty shocked that he's been so effective.  Very encouraging.  I'd guess he might have a whole lot of untapped potential left. 

what does that say about a guy though?  Great sinking fastball and not much else?  If that's so and he could harness a strike out pitch and another average dealing, with his anti-hr profile, he could all of a sudden turn into a excellent mid-rotation prospect.   Need to go back and read on him again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2012, 01:13:04 am
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_14_iowaaa_tucaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 15, 2012, 01:14:14 am
He is from South Africa, and came to america as a sophomore to play baseball.  When drafted, we were told that he was extremely raw because he has such a short background, but he had a slider and a curve to go with a decent fastball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2012, 01:54:35 am
Quote
Selected in the third round of the 2011 draft, Vogelbach was touted for his tremendous power. He wasn't satisfied with just that; he set sights on becoming a more versatile player.

"I don't want be known as just a guy who only hits home runs," Vogelbach said by phone.

....


 Vogelbach has yet to speak with the Cubs' current front-office brass about his standing in the organization and his future. He isn't looking to a potential position switch, either.

"All I'm doing is working to become the best first baseman I can right now," he said.

As Vogelbach works to become a complete player, he has a figure to model his game after. That would be the Cubs' current first baseman, Anthony Rizzo.

"As a player, I want to stay level-minded, hit for power and average like Rizzo," said Vogelbach. "He's a guy that can change the game with any swing. He can also go 4-for-4 or 0-for-0 with four walks. He's a patient hitter that I want to be."


http://cubs.scout.com/2/1211606.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2012, 01:56:42 am
Piece on Pierce Johnson:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/08/15/2232092/baseball-life-suits-johnson-just.html#wgt=rcntnews
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 15, 2012, 05:25:08 am
Vogelbach has yet to speak with the Cubs' current front-office brass about his standing in the organization and his future. He isn't looking to a potential position switch, either.

"All I'm doing is working to become the best first baseman I can right now," he said.
http://cubs.scout.com/2/1211606.html

I may be reading too much into it, but it almost sounds as if either Vogelbach understands he may end up moved to LF, or that the Cubs have even discussed it with him some, perhaps even having him do some work there already, even if not playing him there in any games.  It also sounds as if he is open to that possibility.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 08:35:46 am
It's always helpful to refer to a player by name instead of saying "he".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 08:57:02 am
Quote
NEGRIN JOINS I-CUBS: RH Yoanner Negrin will join triple-A Iowa for the first time in his career after RH Casey Coleman was placed on the disabled list with a right shoulder strain. Negrin began the season with Las Olmecas de Tabasco of the Mexican League and played there until late July. In 24 games (16 starts) with Tabasco, the Cuban-born hurler posted a 7-6 record with a 3.12 ERA (36ER/104.0 IP), struck out 78, walked 51 and surrendered just four home runs. Before his promotion to Iowa, the righty made one start with double-A Tennessee this month. Negrin tossed five shutout innings in the outing and allowed one hit, one walk and fanned four. Coleman made two starts with Iowa after being optioned by the Cubs for a second time on August 3. Before his injury shortened outing, Coleman fanned a season-high eight in six shutout innings of work against Reno on August 5.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 15, 2012, 09:02:44 am
If Coleman is done for the year, what are we going to do for our rotation once Samardzija is shut down?

I mean this seriously.

Travis Wood, Chris Volstad, Justin Germano, Brooks Raley, __________________
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 15, 2012, 09:06:02 am
Quote
In 24 games (16 starts) with Tabasco, the Cuban-born hurler posted a 7-6 record with a 3.12 ERA (36ER/104.0 IP), struck out 78, walked 51 and surrendered just four home runs.

BTW we really are scraping for the bottom of the barrel now for Iowa fill-ins aren't we?

78:51 strikeout to walk ratio in Mexico? 

First Seth McClung and now this guy.  Ugh.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 15, 2012, 09:12:27 am
Austin Kirk?  Yeah I know he's not ready and no chan, but that's a good question.  Scrap heap signing?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 09:20:19 am
BTW we really are scraping for the bottom of the barrel now for Iowa fill-ins aren't we?
The I-Cubs are in town and I can't come up with a single reason to go see them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on August 15, 2012, 09:31:02 am
Didn't the Cubs just sign Seth McClung or someone of that ilk?  He could start a couple games.  And what happened to Rodrigo Lopez?  Is he still with the organization?

If Samardzija isn't shut down until mid-September, it's only going to be 2-3 times through the rotation.  But yeah, when Travis Wood is your best starter by a very wide margin, that's not good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 15, 2012, 09:34:20 am
It's always helpful to refer to a player by name instead of saying "he".

The only person mentioned in the language I quoted was Vogelbach.

The only person I mentioned in what I wrote was.... Vogelbach.

Is there anyone, other than Vogelbach, who "he" could have been referring to?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 15, 2012, 09:35:48 am
If Coleman is done for the year, what are we going to do for our rotation once Samardzija is shut down?

I mean this seriously.

Travis Wood, Chris Volstad, Justin Germano, Brooks Raley, __________________

Does it really matter?

I mean this seriously.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 09:37:01 am
The Iowa DL consists of Rodrigo Lopez, Randy Wells, Casey Coleman, Rafael Dolis, and a couple position players (Blake DeWitt is one of them).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 09:43:44 am
The I-Cubs are in town and I can't come up with a single reason to go see them.
I do plan to go up to Mesa and see a couple AFL games.  The Solar Sox schedule just came out:

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_sch&sid=l119&cid=555&y=2012 (http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_sch&sid=l119&cid=555&y=2012)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 15, 2012, 09:48:22 am
Well the Iowa rotation right now appears to consist of Ty'Relle Harris, Chris Rusin, Frankie De La Cruz, and Ryan Rowland-Smith.   One of Seth McClung and Yoanner Negrin would fill in for Coleman I presume.

I guess Ryan Rowland-Smith, since he's the one with major league experience?  De La Cruz is pitching the best of the bunch, but with 58 BB's and 57 K's this year, he's doing it on smoke and mirrors.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 11:04:44 am
ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @CSNMooney Ricketts gave Fleita-who was connected in Latin America & played for Hendry at Creighton-a new 4-yr contract late last season

8m ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @CSNMooney As @BruceMiles2112 reported, Oneri Fleita is out as #Cubs continue shaking up front office.

22m ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @BruceMiles2112 Source:Oneri Fleita out as #Cubs front office continues changing.More later on Daily Herald.Fleita led player development
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on August 15, 2012, 11:06:58 am
Just posted this in the '12 topic.  lol

Apparently the Cubs have now confirmed it, according to Miles.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 15, 2012, 11:20:57 am
Really glad Fleita is gone....I had resigned myself to the fact he would be staying...glad i was wrong.  Irrelevant of the strength of the drafts and overseas signings, the Cubs still should have gotten more out of the talent acquired.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 15, 2012, 11:35:43 am
Irrelevant of the strength of the drafts and overseas signings, the Cubs still should have gotten more out of the talent acquired.

I imagine the Gerardo Concepcion contract didn't help matters with Fleita either.  Granted no telling how much of that is on Theo/McLeod and how much is on Fleita himself, but when you head up international scouting and make an apparent $7 million mistake like that, that can't bode well for your future.

On top of that, for the credit we've given Fleita and Weaver for building up our international operations, it doesn't seem like we've really gotten great bang for the buck so far with our high profile international signings.  The only high priced ones who have really made their marks up to this point are Hak-Ju Lee (a long time ago) and Jeimer Candelario.

It probably is time for just simply a fresh set of eyes in international scouting.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2012, 11:39:51 am
Still wonder how much signing Concepcion had to do with recruiting his friend Soler.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 15, 2012, 12:43:23 pm
I believe that to be a misconception.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 15, 2012, 12:51:17 pm
I imagine the Gerardo Concepcion contract didn't help matters with Fleita either.  Granted no telling how much of that is on Theo/McLeod and how much is on Fleita himself, but when you head up international scouting and make an apparent $7 million mistake like that, that can't bode well for your future.

On top of that, for the credit we've given Fleita and Weaver for building up our international operations, it doesn't seem like we've really gotten great bang for the buck so far with our high profile international signings.  The only high priced ones who have really made their marks up to this point are Hak-Ju Lee (a long time ago) and Jeimer Candelario.

It probably is time for just simply a fresh set of eyes in international scouting.



I am actually a bit happy to see Fleita gone, but looking only at the performance of high priced signings, while ignoring the lower priced signings, such as Castro, seems to be an entirely unfair way of evaluating the foreign signings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 15, 2012, 01:02:12 pm
I liked Fleet.

I met him several times and he was a somewhat arrogant dude but he loved baseball and was willing to talk to you about it rather freely and seeing that he was the farm director for my Cubbies I enjoyed the **** out of it.

I asked him when this whole process started as far as the Cubs being sold and such if he was concerned about his job and he told me "you never spend your time worrying about something you cant control".

Im glad he didnt worry about it for all these years.

Im sure he wont have a problem finding another job in baseball and whether he has to go backwards or not he's still gonna get to make a living in baseball and that aint too bad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 15, 2012, 01:21:25 pm
I can't imagine that the signing of Concepcion was a factor in the departure of Fleita.  For that matter, I don't understand the common view that the signing was a monumental mistake.  At that point in time, just before the implementation of the new rules, the market price for a lift handed pitcher that had two good breaking pitches and could reach 93 on his fastball was about 5 million.

Since then, he came down with an illness (the rumor is that it is valley fever rather than mono) that caused him to lose more than ten pounds over the winter and another 15 pounds while at Peoria.  I doubt that the Cubs front office is stupid enough to believe that scouts should have predicted it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 03:49:58 pm
Peoria Chiefs ‏@peoriachiefs
Roster Moves today: Paul Hoilman (dislocated finger) & Zach Cates (R shoulder strain) to DL. Add 1B Jacob Rogers - Mesa & P W. Cruz - Boise
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 15, 2012, 06:15:02 pm
I don't recall anyone suggesting that Concepcion ever saw 93 MPH unless it was behind the wheel of a car.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 06:54:09 pm
Well the Iowa rotation right now appears to consist of Ty'Relle Harris, Chris Rusin, Frankie De La Cruz, and Ryan Rowland-Smith.   One of Seth McClung and Yoanner Negrin would fill in for Coleman I presume.

FRANKIE SAYS GOODBYE: RH Frankie De La Cruz was released by the Chicago Cubs to sign a contract with the Uni-President 7-Eleven Lions of the Chinese Professional Baseball League. The Domincan import posted a 1-6 record with a 3.80 ERA in 27 games, including 14 starts with Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 15, 2012, 06:55:52 pm
Quote
AUSSIE INVASION: RH Ryan Searle joins the I-Cubs today from advanced-A Daytona for his first appearance on a triple-A roster. The Queensland native is the second Austrailian born hurler on the club, joining LH Ryan Rowland-Smith out of Kingscliff. The 23 year old is 5-3 with a 5.01 ERA (26 ER/46.2 IP) in 28 outings (1 start) with Daytona this season. Searle began the 2012 campaign at double-A Tennessee and posted a 1-2 record with a 4.07 ERA (11 ER/24.1 IP) over eight appearances (2 starts).

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=P&sid=t451&t=p_pbp&pid=545989
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 15, 2012, 07:18:21 pm
Promoting single-A pitchers with 5 ERAs two levels - wow.  The cupboard really is bare.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 15, 2012, 07:37:53 pm
Promoting single-A pitchers with 5 ERAs two levels - wow.  The cupboard really is bare.

Well, he had a 5.01 ERA in A ball and a 4.07 ERA in AA. Perhaps they hope he'll cut it to 3.00 in Iowa, then 2.0 in Chicago.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 15, 2012, 07:45:13 pm
Daytona is actually playing tonight.  Crazy.

Baez is 0-6 thus far on the night, he's down to .071.  There were some who said he wasn't challenged at Peoria. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 15, 2012, 07:53:16 pm
Anybody know what's up with Kyle Hendricks?  He's pitched 4 innings over the last 26 days. 

Do we know what's wrong with him, and did the Cubs know about that when they acquired him?  Or was his injury issues known and one of the reasons he was available? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 15, 2012, 07:58:51 pm
AJ Morris is the guy we got for Gorzellany who needed surgery.  He's now down to 2.33 ERA, with a WHIP under 1.0, very few walks, only 1 HR, and a GO/AO ratio of over 2.0. 

Not sure what his post-surg arm is really like, but he's been pretty good for FSL. 

He gave up 6 of his hits and a couple of his runs very early in April, but has been pretty consistently effective since. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 15, 2012, 08:00:14 pm
We used to get pitchers from the International scene like Zambrano, Cruz and Guzman. Who's the best foreign pitcher the Cubs have signed and developed in the past decade? Marcos Mateo?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 15, 2012, 08:11:47 pm
We didn't sign Mateo.  We traded for him. 

Marmol was signed back in the 90's, so I guess he doesn't qualify. 

Ryu was 2001, so I guess he's not this decade either, but he made the majors, even with a 7.49 ERA. 

Maybe Searle (has now reached AAA), Batista (pitched 7 innings in AAA), Rhee, or maybe Hung-Wen Chen, he was given a few starts in AAA a year or two back. 

Yes, it's a pretty failure list. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 15, 2012, 08:22:34 pm
AJ Morris is the guy we got for Gorzellany who needed surgery.  He's now down to 2.33 ERA, with a WHIP under 1.0, very few walks, only 1 HR, and a GO/AO ratio of over 2.0. 

Not sure what his post-surg arm is really like, but he's been pretty good for FSL. 

He gave up 6 of his hits and a couple of his runs very early in April, but has been pretty consistently effective since. 

I'm guessing that Morris is a guy who possibly could be rostered after the season. A contender anyway. Obviously, very old for his level (25) but I think he was a college senior sign and started his career at age 22.  This is actually only his 3rd pro season playing (missed a season with the injury)--and one was a partial season after signing.  So, he could move very fast next season if healthy.  He was the most intriguing player in the Gorzelanny trade I think even though Cubs knew he was hurt.  Wonder what the Theo guys think of him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 15, 2012, 08:25:30 pm
Not sure if this matters as to Seale but today is the deadline for moving guys from A ball up to AA or AAA to avoid the AZ Fall League limitations on Class A players who can be sent to play there.  So, there is some movement around MLB for that reason. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 15, 2012, 08:27:30 pm
..... I don't understand the common view that the signing was a monumental mistake.  At that point in time, just before the implementation of the new rules, the market price for a lift handed pitcher that had two good breaking pitches and could reach 93 on his fastball was about 5 million.

Since then, he came down with an illness (the rumor is that it is valley fever rather than mono) that caused him to lose more than ten pounds over the winter and another 15 pounds while at Peoria.  I doubt that the Cubs front office is stupid enough to believe that scouts should have predicted it.

I think the 7. 39 ERA, 70H/30BB/6HR/52IP/28K, and allowing 52 runs in 52 innings,  might contribute to that common view?   

I'd heard that he'd gone DL for mono, but I hadn't heard this latest.  If he's been deeply sick all summer, and has lots 25 pounds, that might explain a lack of life on his fastball and everything else.  If true, I see both some good and some bad...

Good:  If a guy can get healthy, how he pitches when he's not healthy might not be very meaningful.  So if he can get healthy again by next season, maybe he'll end up being a totally different, and better, guy.  Who maybe can hit 93 and throw two good breaking pitches.  Fun to hope.  (I'd put Simpson in my top-15 this winter with similar sorts of hopes....)

Bad:  He's been with the Cubs since March.  If he was deeply sick, lost 25 pounds, that sickness was costing him, but they still took at least 3 months to notice, that doesn't speak very well of the care or awareness of Cub staff. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 15, 2012, 08:52:47 pm
I don't recall anyone suggesting that Concepcion ever saw 93 MPH unless it was behind the wheel of a car.

The original reports when they signed him was that his fastball reached 93.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 15, 2012, 08:55:16 pm
This was BA's scouting report on Concepcion before he signed.

Quote
Gerardo Concepcion, lhp

Concepcion, 19, was the rookie of the year in Cuba in 2010-11, when he posted a 3.36 ERA in 101 2/3 innings pitching for the Industriales. While his ERA ranked 11th in the league, he averaged just 4.7 strikeouts per nine innings with 53 strikeouts and 43 walks, though he was facing much older competition in Cuba. He defected last June in the Netherlands at the World Port Tournament, though he didn't pitch there.

Concepcion is a slender 6-foot-2 with long arms, sloped shoulders and an athletic, wiry build that could have some projection remaining. He has advanced feel for pitching for his age and has shown the ability to pitch with his fastball to both sides of the plate, though he doesn't have the stuff to miss many bats. At times his fastball ranges from 88-92 mph, though some scouts have said they've seen him dip to 86-90 mph at times.

Concepcion has had success in Cuba by being able to change speeds to keep hitters off balance. Some scouts like Concepcion's mid-70s curveball, which shows good depth at times, but others say it gets loopy. He throws slightly across his body, which provides him with a little deception, but it's a concern for some scouts who think his mechanics hamper his ability to get to the front side of his delivery and show consistency with his breaking ball. Concepcion also throws a changeup (some scouts have called it a splitter), though like many young pitchers it's still a work in progress.

While some scouts view Concepcion's upside as a No. 5 starter, others see a bit more, though with his present stuff it's hard to project more than a back-end starter for now. Concepcion, who became a free agent earlier this month, would likely begin his career at one of the Class A levels.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 15, 2012, 09:05:27 pm
At times his fastball ranges from 88-92 mph,

That IS quite a ways from 93.  But after all, that is the only scouting report ever done on him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 15, 2012, 09:38:32 pm
Almora with a home run in his first game in Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2012, 10:02:39 pm
Soler: DNP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_15_burafx_peoafx_1


Struck: 6-5-1-0-1-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_15_tenaax_biraax_1


Baez: 0-4, 2 K

Torreyes: 2-4, 2B, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_15_dbcafa_lakafa_1

Baez: 1-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_15_dbcafa_lakafa_2

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2012, 10:06:22 pm

Emeterio: 2-4, 2B, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_15_dorrok_dcurok_1


DSL2:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_15_dchrok_dmerok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 15, 2012, 11:22:53 pm
Almora: 2-5, HR, RBI

Amaya: 2-4, K, CS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_15_skvasx_boiasx_1



Dunston: 1-3, BB, K, Assist

Underwood: 2-2-2-2-1-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_15_cubrok_angrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 16, 2012, 12:05:02 am
Boise highlights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&v=yhNbZlBVy9E&feature=player_detailpage (http://i2.ytimg.com/vi/yhNbZlBVy9E/mqdefault.jpg)


 Don't bother - see Chris' post below
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2012, 12:09:02 am
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_15_iowaaa_tucaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2012, 12:14:02 am
I think this is what Cactus meant to leave:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhNbZlBVy9E&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 16, 2012, 12:18:19 am
Javier Baez was 1-8 and is now hitting .100 (3-30)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 16, 2012, 01:00:41 am
Wow, that is one monstrous leg kick and long swing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2012, 01:54:43 am
Quote
Almora finished 2-for-5 and was robbed of another hit with a diving catch by Volcanoes’ left-fielder Brennan Metzer. … Almora was shaken up after hitting the wall hard while trying to make a play in center field in the sixth inning. That put a scare into the crowd and sent team trainer Bob Grimes and Johnson running out to the field. Almora stayed in the game after a short delay.


http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/08/16/2233600/cubs-first-round-pick-delivers.html

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2012, 03:10:57 am
A look at Baez and Soler:

http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120814/sports/708149706/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 16, 2012, 10:35:47 am
Quote from: Theo Epstein
“It’s been a really, really difficult day for everyone involved,” Epstein said. “First I just want to thank Oneri. He was a tremendous contributor to the Cubs for a long, long time and helped get the organization to the point where it’s at now. He certainly deserves everyone’s thanks and will be an asset to whatever organization he joins next.

That's kind of a backhanded compliment isn't it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 16, 2012, 12:00:23 pm
A look at Baez and Soler:

http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120814/sports/708149706/

Two very exciting prospects right there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2012, 02:15:40 pm
John Manuel BA chat:

Quote
Keith (Manchester, CT): Thanks John. How impressive are Dan Vogelbach's numbers — .326/.391/.691 in 181 AB in Rookie Ball and Short Season — given that he turns 20 in December? How high do you see his ceiling?


John Manuel: Another guy who can flat-out hit, like Winker. Ceiling is definitely as a first-division starter at 1b, or as a Travis Hafner-ish DH. No one really questioned the hitting ability out of HS; some scouts even tried to throw a Prince Fielder comp on Vogelbach. One problem is all the value is in the bat, but that's a huge start to a pro career. The feel for hitting is what everyone underestimated about Prince Fielder back in 2002; his feel for hitting allowed him to get to his power. Vogelbach has some of that, but let's see him cut down on the K's next year when he goes to full-season ball before he gets Fielder comps as a pro.


Quote
Navin (Pasadena, CA): What are your thoughts on the dismissal of Oneri Fleita?


John Manuel: Jim and Will Lingo will remember my rant about Oneri during the 2007 Prospect Handbook book tour. It was inevitable; he played at Creighton and was clearly part of Jim Hendry's posse in Chicago. Being in a baseball front office is like being in Congress in a way, there's a long voting record to go through and pick over and see hits and misses. Oneri has hits and misses too.I'm sure he has his fans, friends and allies in the industry; I just don't know any of them.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 16, 2012, 02:25:41 pm
Quote
Navin (Pasadena, CA): What are your thoughts on the dismissal of Oneri Fleita?

John Manuel: Jim and Will Lingo will remember my rant about Oneri during the 2007 Prospect Handbook book tour. It was inevitable; he played at Creighton and was clearly part of Jim Hendry's posse in Chicago. Being in a baseball front office is like being in Congress in a way, there's a long voting record to go through and pick over and see hits and misses. Oneri has hits and misses too.I'm sure he has his fans, friends and allies in the industry; I just don't know any of them.

Ouch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 16, 2012, 03:07:20 pm
Quote
John Manuel: Another guy who can flat-out hit, like Winker. Ceiling is definitely as a first-division starter at 1b, or as a Travis Hafner-ish DH. No one really questioned the hitting ability out of HS; some scouts even tried to throw a Prince Fielder comp on Vogelbach. One problem is all the value is in the bat, but that's a huge start to a pro career. The feel for hitting is what everyone underestimated about Prince Fielder back in 2002; his feel for hitting allowed him to get to his power. Vogelbach has some of that, but let's see him cut down on the K's next year when he goes to full-season ball before he gets Fielder comps as a pro.

Still doesn't sound like anyone's really taking the idea of moving him to LF in the future very seriously.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 16, 2012, 03:27:07 pm
I can't imagine that anyone would be looking seriously at moving him to another position until he reaches AAA at the earliest.  They may work him out somewhere, but that is a lot different than making decisions right now.  Too much can happen in the next 3 -4 years or more that changes everything.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 16, 2012, 03:37:13 pm
"I'm sure he has his fans, friends and allies in the industry; I just don't know any of them."
Ouch.

Wow, ouch is right.  Pretty strong. 

JR, on Vogel, I agree that none of the media guys seems to take that very seriously.  Still, the comment was "all the value is in the bat".  We know he's not going to get a job based on his speed or defense. 

But I think that still leaves a huge landscape for average, mediocre, bad, anti-awful, and awful.  None of those kinds of things add value.  But not all are show-stoppers. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 16, 2012, 03:38:56 pm
Ouch.

Thank goodness the adults have taken away the keys, that's all I have to say.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 16, 2012, 03:45:50 pm
It's just amazing Fleita was allowed to run the system for that long with such a mediocre reputation and mediocre/bad results.  Hendry just didn't know when to cut bait when someone wasn't getting the job done.

A big reason why Hendry got fired in the first place is because Fleita's farm system just wasn't all that good at producing quality players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 16, 2012, 03:57:23 pm
Hopefully Theo and his cronies can run the organization better than Hendry and his cronies did.

/half-kidding
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 16, 2012, 04:03:32 pm
Hopefully Theo and his cronies can run the organization better than Hendry and his cronies did.

/half-kidding

I actually don't think that's all that bad of a point.  If the farm system doesn't start producing like it did in Boston, I hope Theo's able to hold guys like McLeod responsible, and I hope McLeod will be able to hold all of these guys he's importing from San Diego responsible.

Basically we are starting to recreate the Boston/San Diego show in Chicago in a lot of ways. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 16, 2012, 04:20:37 pm
Fleita talked a very good game.  I truly believe his gift of gab and his sensationalizing the prospects kept him employed.  Even now, some are nervous that we may lose some valuable contacts.  He reminds me of a coach whose primary talent is recruiting but the results on the field are unspectacular.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 16, 2012, 05:25:37 pm
Soler out again for Chiefs on Thursday

Unless he makes a surprise appearance off the bench tonight Jorge Soler’s home debut with the Peoria Chiefs will now come Friday at the earliest.

The right fielder was held out of Thursday’s game with Burlington with an undisclosed ailment.

“It’s just something that he had when he came and tried to play through it,” Chiefs manager Casey Kopitzke said. “It’s just giving him a couple of extra days to get back ahead of it.”

Soler played Monday in Beloit and will now have three days off, after the league-wide off day on Tuesday and being held out of the lineup the first two games of the series.

“We’ve only seen him one game (his Midwest League debut on Aug. 10),” Burlington manager Aaron Nieckula said after Wednesday’s game. “I know he’s the big bopper. Anytime you’ve got a big guy like that sitting on the bench you’ve got to breathe a sigh of relief.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 16, 2012, 05:35:07 pm
Quote from: Carrie Muskat
The Cubs have signed left-handed pitcher Horacio Ramirez to a Minor League contract, and he was assigned to Triple-A Iowa.  Ramirez began the season playing independent ball with the Lancaster Barnstormers of the Atlantic League. He was 2-0 with a 1.96 ERA, giving up eight earned runs over 36 2/3 innings in 12 games (six starts). He was originally drafted by the Braves in the fifth round of the 1997 First-Year Player Draft. Ramirez has played for five different teams, making his ML debut in 2003 with the Braves as a starter. He also has pitched for the Mariners, Royals, White Sox and Dodgers. A California native, he is 40-35 with a 4.65 ERA (356 earned runs/688 1/3 IP) and 318 strikeouts.

The Iowa Cubs also announced right-handed pitcher Jaye Chapman, acquired from the Braves in the Paul Maholm-Reed Johnson deal, was placed on the disabled list with a strained elbow, retroactive to Aug. 14. Chapman, acquired along with pitcher Arodys Vizcaino, was 3-6 with seven saves and a 3.52 ERA in 40 relief appearances with Triple-A Gwinnett this year. In six appearances with the I-Cubs, he gave up eight earned runs over 7 1/3 innings.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on August 16, 2012, 07:25:28 pm
Looks like Baez is out of his Daytona slump.  2-3 so far with a double, a HR and 3 RBI. 

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t450&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_dbcafa_lakafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2012, 07:50:13 pm
Soler's injury is either a hand or a thumb.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 16, 2012, 08:24:11 pm
Eeww. That's too bad.  Szczur is out tonight too, I assume he's hurt somehow?  Almora ran into the wall last night, I wonder if he'll play. 

Bijan Rademacher, I'd figured he was for pitching even though he didn't want to, and I'd kind of hoped he'd realize quickly he should switch over.  His good start at Boise didn't help, but his OPS is now down in the .540's at Peoria.  I doubt he'll do it, but I still kind of hope that this winter he realizes pitching is his better shot, and moves over sooner rather than later. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 16, 2012, 08:46:25 pm
Soler's injury is either a hand or a thumb.

Perhaps, but anytime a team seems to be secretive about an injury I wonder whether it might be something which the player or team would be embarrassed to make public.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 16, 2012, 08:51:25 pm
Bijan Rademacher, I'd figured he was for pitching even though he didn't want to, and I'd kind of hoped he'd realize quickly he should switch over.  His good start at Boise didn't help, but his OPS is now down in the .540's at Peoria.  I doubt he'll do it, but I still kind of hope that this winter he realizes pitching is his better shot, and moves over sooner rather than later. 

Exhibit #15828428 on why Boise stats don't mean a whole lot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 16, 2012, 09:07:53 pm
Orville doesn't have much pop.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 16, 2012, 09:09:49 pm
Looks like Baez is out of his Daytona slump.  2-3 so far with a double, a HR and 3 RBI. 

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=t450&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_dbcafa_lakafa_1

He's a special player.  If the Cubs keep challenging him, he's going to move very, very quickly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 16, 2012, 09:21:46 pm
Orville doesn't have much pop.

Are you trying to be corny?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 16, 2012, 09:29:03 pm
Another double for Baez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 16, 2012, 09:33:01 pm
Yeah he's definitely special.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 16, 2012, 09:40:39 pm
Thanks, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 16, 2012, 10:50:36 pm
Pierce Johnson with two innings, no hits, one walk, 5 strike outs.

Time for a JR comment on how Boise stats are meaningless.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 16, 2012, 10:52:43 pm
Time for a JR comment on how Boise stats are meaningless.

Yep, absolutely meaningless.  : )
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 16, 2012, 11:01:13 pm
Baez: 3-4, 2B, HR, 3 RBI

Torreyes: 1-4, 2B, BB, K, E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_dbcafa_lakafa_1


Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_burafx_peoafx_1


Zych: 2-1-0-0-1-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 16, 2012, 11:11:16 pm
Dunston with a HR and three hits tonight, thus far.  For a few minutes he was over .300.  He's got 15walks/20K in Arizona, not bad. 

With Mesa having gone through Vogelbach, then Soler, than Almora, he's the last big ticket left there, and batted 3rd tonight.  But his output there has shown some progress.  Who knows.  Schlecht and Gretzky have shown some limited progress as well.  Both have gotten their averages at least mid-.200's, each takes some walks, both strike out but none are humungous whiffers. 

I can imagine that with HS guys like this, one season to just kind of get calibrated to pro ball is useful.  By next year, if they're going to end up good, they should step up.  But perhaps just staying anti-awful isn't so dreadful for them for this year. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2012, 12:17:26 am
Amaya: 1-3, 3B, 3 BB, K

Vogelbach: 1-3, 2B, RBI, 2 BB, K

Almora: 2-5, 2B, K, CS

Candelario: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_boiasx_triasx_1



Dunston: 3-4, HR, 3 RBI, K

Prieto: 3-1-0-0-0-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_cinrok_cubrok_1


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_iowaaa_tucaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 17, 2012, 12:30:27 am
Vogelbach's double was off the batter's eye in center field - 400'
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 17, 2012, 12:31:58 am
Iowa at Tucson was a Seth McClung/Kip Wells matchup.  Sorry I missed it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2012, 12:38:38 am
Alcala: 2-5, 2 RBI, K

Rodriguez: 5-3-3-0-2-7

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_dcurok_dorrok_1


Pieters: 0-1-6-6-5-0

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_16_dmerok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2012, 02:55:08 am
Baez article:

Quote
Baez has "top-shelf bat speed," according to one National League scout who recently saw him play. "I haven't seen that type of bat speed this year outside of the big leagues. It's pure, unadulterated, just violent bat-speed."

He compared Baez's swing -- and bat-waggle -- to that of Gary Sheffield, who played more than 20 years in the big leagues and hit 509 home runs.

....


"He's got this insatiable drive to be a winner and his competitiveness is top of the scale," said Wilken. "He'll fight you in dominoes ... he's extremely competitive."

....


Wilken wants people to know that not only is Baez's makeup not a concern, he's more than just an offensive force.

"He was 20-for-23 in steals in a month and a half (in Peoria)," Wilken said. "If you prorate that for a whole season, he'd probably be fourth in all of minor league baseball in stolen bases and no one says anything about it. We're always talking about these prodigious blasts and no one talks about his base-running ability."

While the Cubs believe that Baez can stick at short -- his glove has looked better than advertised in the minors -- most scouts tend to lean towards the opinion that as he climbs through the system he'll eventually move to third base.

"He's got some instincts for the position," said the scout on Baez's ability to play shortstop. "But I feel like as he gets older, as he gets bigger and loses a step, he's gonna have to move to third base. With his current range and hands, he's playing as good a defensive shortstop as he ever will."



http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/12793/baez-quietly-emerging-as-top-cubs-prospect?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 17, 2012, 06:21:07 am
That kid is getting as much love as any prospect we've had since Corey Patterson.

So he's Gary Sheffield at SS [like Gary was early in his days] with blazing speed on the bases?

Gotta love that.

There's always this one kid in your system that you just cant wait to see in Chicago.

Right now he's the one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 17, 2012, 06:25:01 am
Soler,Almora,and Vogelbach strike a ton of interest as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 17, 2012, 08:31:28 am
Some nice stuff.  Nice to see Vogelbach with a couple of walks, that's going to be an important part of his game.  He's got an 8-game K-ing streak at present. 

Prieto at 0.60, has allowed four hits in 15 innings.  Probably considerable luck involved there, of course; 11K/9BB/15IP doesn't seem to profile special.  Doesn't profile as a likely overpowering velocity guy, but to date he's been  bit of an air-ball guy.  We tend to like groundballers, and anything that avoids HR's is good.  But popups and lazy flies are the easiest things to catch and don't often find holes the way that groundballs do.

Nice to see Pierce Johnson racking up K's.  And pitching.  With his arm issues, you always wonder.  He said he signed early because he wanted to start fast.  But then when guys who seemingly signed weeks after he did started pitching in games before he did, I wondered a little if everything was OK.  So having him pitching now, and doing so very well yesterday, is fun.  I know at draft people seemed to be surprisingly uninterested in him, and Underwood seemed to get way more buzz than Blackburn or Johnson.  But I'd like to hope that Johnson might be a pretty interesting guy. 

Nice to see Almora doing well and sequencing a week full of good games.  He may have a big leg kick, but yesterday's K was a rare one.  So at least for now, it doesn't seem to be an issue.  Perhaps it speaks to uncommonly good pitch recognition, pure hitting skill, and unusual body control that he can have a leg kick like and still maintain/adjust his balance and weight transfer on pro pitching and pro breaking balls.  Normally the problem with the leg kick is that if the pitch isn't moving at the speed and spin you expected then your balance is hopeless and you whiff a bunch.  But that seems not to be an Almora problem, thus far.  Of course, maybe there just aren't enough breaking balls, so he can do like Baez and guess/leg-kick for fastballs, and like Baez he swings early and often so he never gets to 2-strike counts.  So maybe it's all fastballs thus far for him, who knows. 

Another day, another missing-in-action for Hendricks.  When a guy has been a starter all year, and then gets used as a reliever once every other week, that isn't real typical.  Bad arm, and they don't want to tell?  Blisters? 


Maybe it 's just intentional work-load restriction?  He's got 135 innings right now.  58 innings (2010 Dartmouth) > 98 innings (2011, Dartmouth+pros) > 135 (2012).  Maybe they just figure that's an appropriate workload buildup for a guy who's 22.  And maybe a lengthy rest will also enable him to show for fall instrux, where all the pitching coaches can work with him more extensively and better get to know what works for him.  So I'm hoping he's fine.  But I admit I'm be encouraged if I read something that explained what was going on with him.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 17, 2012, 08:57:19 am
Quote
Nice to see Pierce Johnson racking up K's.  And pitching.  With his arm issues, you always wonder.  He said he signed early because he wanted to start fast.  But then when guys who seemingly signed weeks after he did started pitching in games before he did, I wondered a little if everything was OK.  So having him pitching now, and doing so very well yesterday, is fun.   

Yeah, my campaign of hate against Boise aside, that line does suggest that he's healthy, and given some of the injury concerns about him entering the draft, that's the most important thing to take away from his performance the rest of the year.

Quote
I know at draft people seemed to be surprisingly uninterested in him, and Underwood seemed to get way more buzz than Blackburn or Johnson.  But I'd like to hope that Johnson might be a pretty interesting guy.

The quotes from Theo seem to suggest we were really excited to be able to land him in the supplemental round and thought he had a lot of upside.  I think the Cub consensus was if he was healthy, he might have been a Top 15-20 pick.

Then again, we haven't had much luck in the past with pitchers who supposedly would have been high picks if it wasn't for injury concerns (Bobby Brownlie, Grant Johnson, Aaron Shafer, Chris Huseby, etc.).  We're kind of overdue to finally get one of these picks to turn out right.
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 17, 2012, 09:06:52 am
By the way, where's Reggie Golden been this year?  Was just looking back on some of our recent classes, and I'd totally forgotten about him.

The top of that 2010 draft just looks awful right now.  Top 3 rounds - Hayden Simpson, Reggie Golden, Micah Gibbs

Hopefully we get something out of guys like Matt Szczur, Ben Wells, and Dustin Geiger down the road because Wilken certainly was not on top of his game for the first few rounds of that draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 17, 2012, 09:14:19 am
Here it is on Reggie Golden.  He tore his ACL in April.

http://www.thecubreporter.com/2012/05/21/angels-cant-even-contain-baez-much-less-stop-him
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 17, 2012, 11:15:48 am


Another day, another missing-in-action for Hendricks.  When a guy has been a starter all year, and then gets used as a reliever once every other week, that isn't real typical.  Bad arm, and they don't want to tell?  Blisters? 


Maybe it 's just intentional work-load restriction?  He's got 135 innings right now.  58 innings (2010 Dartmouth) > 98 innings (2011, Dartmouth+pros) > 135 (2012).  Maybe they just figure that's an appropriate workload buildup for a guy who's 22.  And maybe a lengthy rest will also enable him to show for fall instrux, where all the pitching coaches can work with him more extensively and better get to know what works for him.  So I'm hoping he's fine.  But I admit I'm be encouraged if I read something that explained what was going on with him.


I have read that the Cubs have him on strict pitch count and innings limits because of his workload.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 17, 2012, 11:27:23 am
Yeah, the Cubs said they were scaling him back because of the number of innings he's thrown.  But TBH, he's pretty much an organizational space-filler so it's not worth spilling a lot of ink over it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2012, 12:08:27 pm
that line does suggest that he's healthy, and given some of the injury concerns about him entering the draft, that's the most important thing to take away from his performance the rest of the year.


Yeah, but don't forget that Boise stats are meaningless.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2012, 12:10:13 pm
But TBH, he's pretty much an organizational space-filler so it's not worth spilling a lot of ink over it.

Thus Deeg has written. 

Thus it shall be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 17, 2012, 12:23:32 pm
Yeah, the Cubs said they were scaling him back because of the number of innings he's thrown.  But TBH, he's pretty much an organizational space-filler so it's not worth spilling a lot of ink over it.

I consider Hendricks to be more than space-filler. He pitched 130.2 innings in 20 starts in A+ with 112 K's and only 15 BB's.  Pitchers that consistently stay in the game into the seventh inning and don't walk people have value.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 17, 2012, 12:45:38 pm
They have more value if their fastball would break the skin on a custard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2012, 12:54:35 pm
Quote
No. 7    ALBERT ALMORA, CF, CUBS

Team: Short-season Boise (Northwest) / Rookie-level Arizona League

Age: 18

Why He's Here: .536/.516/.786 (15-for-28), 8 R, 2 2B, 1 3B, 1 HR, 1 BB, 2 SO, 1-for-2 SB

The Scoop: Almora spent his first three weeks in the Arizona League, where the sixth overall pick in the 2012 draft came as advertised. Upon his promotion to the Northwest League, Almora homered in his first game with Boise on Wednesday. It's been an auspicious debut for Almora, who has hit .353/.367/.518 in 20 games between the two levels. If there is such thing as a stacked short-season lineup, it has to be Boise, where the Hawks now have Almora, first baseman Dan Vogelbach, third baseman Jeimer Candelario and second baseman Gioskar Amaya. The best of the group, though, is Almora, whose feel for hitting is beyond his years.



http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/prospect-hot-sheet/2012/2613902.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dihard on August 17, 2012, 01:00:15 pm
Dunston with a HR and three hits tonight, thus far.  For a few minutes he was over .300.  He's got 15walks/20K in Arizona, not bad. 

The Shawon-o-meter lives!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 17, 2012, 01:11:02 pm
Yeah, but don't forget that Boise stats are meaningless.

Yes, yes they are.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 17, 2012, 02:17:49 pm
Eligibility Rules
The eligibility rules to play in the AFL are simple.

The roster size is 30 players per team.

Each Major League organization is required to provide six players subject to the following requirements:


The pickings at Iowa are pretty slim, maybe Juan Apodoca?

Tennessee:  Justin Bour, Junior Lake (again), Matt Szczur, and Jae-Hoon Ha.

Plus Javier Baez from Daytona?

The rules don't say each MLB team must provide at least one pitcher.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2012, 02:23:18 pm
Quote
Plus Javier Baez from Daytona?

Hoyer said he wants Soler to go.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2012, 02:27:34 pm
Quote
The rules don't say each MLB team must provide at least one pitcher.

I would guess McNutt as a reliever; perhaps Zych.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 17, 2012, 02:35:50 pm
Australian Winter League?  Never saw that before.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2012, 02:49:12 pm
They have more value if their fastball would break the skin on a custard.

And they have less value if they walk every other batter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 17, 2012, 02:52:33 pm
Give me a list of effective ML starters whose fastball sits in the mid-80s and tops out at 88-89, especially RH starters.  It's a short list.  As Hendricks climbs the minors he's not going to be able to feast on bad hitters chasing bad pitches and his lack of stuff (he doesn't have a plus breaking pitch, either) will catch up to him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2012, 02:54:40 pm
Did Hoyer say that he wanted Soler to play in the AFL?  My understanding was that he wanted Soler to play in the fall, and I took that to mean the Arizona Instructional league, which will probably have most of the year's draft high draft choices.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2012, 03:43:30 pm
Did Hoyer say that he wanted Soler to play in the AFL?


I confused Hoyer with McLeod. It was McLeod who said he wanted Soler to play either in the AFL or instructional league if the AFL didn't work out. I can't find that article but here's another:


Quote
McLeod is not sure if Soler or hard-hitting Class A shortstop Javier Baez will play in the Arizona Fall League, which begins its season in early October and runs until the third week of November.


http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/12647/cubs-to-use-wilken-at-greater-capacity
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on August 17, 2012, 04:09:13 pm
What's so amazing about the fact that today's MLB pitchers almost all throw 90+ is that 88-89 looks like a freight train when you are standing up close.
And that's not even considering what that velocity is like when the ball is moving like crazy!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 17, 2012, 04:49:18 pm
Jackson, Vitters and Castillo are eligible for the AFL as well I assume.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 17, 2012, 05:32:22 pm
Eligibility Rules
The eligibility rules to play in the AFL are simple.

The roster size is 30 players per team.

Each Major League organization is required to provide six players subject to the following requirements:

  • All Triple-A and Double-A players are eligible, provided the players are on at least a Double-A level roster no later than Aug. 1.
  • One player below the Double-A level is allowed per Major League team.
  • One foreign player is allowed, as long as the player does not reside in a country that participates in winter ball, as part of the Caribbean Confederation or the Australian winter league.
  • No players with more than one year of credited Major League service as of August 31 are eligible, except a team may select one player picked in the most recently concluded Major League Rule 5 Draft.
  • To be eligible, players on Minor League disabled lists must be activated at least 45 days before the conclusion of their respective seasons.

The pickings at Iowa are pretty slim, maybe Juan Apodoca?

Tennessee:  Justin Bour, Junior Lake (again), Matt Szczur, and Jae-Hoon Ha.

Plus Javier Baez from Daytona?

The rules don't say each MLB team must provide at least one pitcher.




I know the above is from the AFL official website, but I think it's out of date.  See link below re. Nationals and AFL this coming Fall.

http://www.masnsports.com/byron_kerr/2012/08/under-new-rules-rendon-eligible-to-play-in-arizona-fall-league.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 17, 2012, 06:47:54 pm
Another day, another missing-in-action for Hendricks.  When a guy has been a starter all year, and then gets used as a reliever once every other week, that isn't real typical.  Bad arm, and they don't want to tell?  Blisters? 

Maybe it 's just intentional work-load restriction?  He's got 135 innings right now.  58 innings (2010 Dartmouth) > 98 innings (2011, Dartmouth+pros) > 135 (2012).  Maybe they just figure that's an appropriate workload buildup for a guy who's 22.  And maybe a lengthy rest will also enable him to show for fall instrux, where all the pitching coaches can work with him more extensively and better get to know what works for him.  So I'm hoping he's fine.  But I admit I'm be encouraged if I read something that explained what was going on with him.

The Theocracy has shown some caution with innings totals with at least one other top pitching prospect in the minors, and seems inclined to do the same with Smardz.

I'm happy to see it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on August 17, 2012, 06:50:32 pm
Baez singles and steals second in his first at bat tonight.  The hit gets his Daytona batting average up to .200. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 17, 2012, 07:25:32 pm
I know the above is from the AFL official website, but I think it's out of date.  See link below re. Nationals and AFL this coming Fall.

http://www.masnsports.com/byron_kerr/2012/08/under-new-rules-rendon-eligible-to-play-in-arizona-fall-league.html

If right, those would be some significant changes: But under new roster guidelines, teams can send seven players to the AFL. The seven appointments can include two low Single-A or first-year draft picks signed by July 13, two high-A players and three Double-A or higher participants.

Further, a team is not required to send low Single-A or high Single-A players if they so choose.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2012, 08:17:00 pm
Hendricks pitched 4 innings for Daytona tonight
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 17, 2012, 09:52:02 pm
Baez singles and steals second in his first at bat tonight.  The hit gets his Daytona batting average up to .200. 

Wasn't there a scouting report earlier in the year that Baez was stealing so many bases because young pitchers don't know how to hold runners?

I'm not saying that I buy it but I'm pretty sure I read it somewhere.  It may have been Kevin Goldstein on the Twitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2012, 09:57:36 pm
Of course, young pitchers don't know how to hold ANY runners.  But few others have been able to take as much advantage of it as Baez has.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2012, 09:58:27 pm
Almora with a single in his first at bat, bringing his average up to 455.

Of course, Boise stats are meaningless.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 17, 2012, 10:07:15 pm
Of course, young pitchers don't know how to hold ANY runners.  But few others have been able to take as much advantage of it as Baez has.

Yeah, I think that's how I come down on this, too.  Baez clearly has some stealing ability and/or baseball IQ in order to take advantage of situations when pitchers are falling asleep out there.  Either way, it's a clear plus.

Even if he loses a step as he fills out/matures he will probably be a guy that can swipe a base when he needs to in a big situation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 17, 2012, 10:08:21 pm
The good news?  Soler back in the lineup.  The bad news?  0-4 with 3 Ks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 17, 2012, 10:17:45 pm
Quote
Of course, Boise stats are meaningless.

They are, they are, they are.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 17, 2012, 10:19:40 pm
I mean hey it's great Almora is doing well. We knew we were drafting a talented player, and he's showing that.

Still, it's terrible competition he's facing.  He ought to be doing well against weak competition.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 17, 2012, 10:30:34 pm
Deeg and DaveP: I think Hendricks has a chance to be a decent #4 or 5 starter or a middle reliever at the MLB level. The comps I have are Jamie Moyer, Justin Germano and perhaps Greg Maddux in his last season or two. The ability to throw strikes and avoid walks and home runs is far more valuable than a 91-92 MPH fastball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 17, 2012, 11:01:49 pm
Villanueva: 2-4, 2B, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_17_tbyafa_dbcafa_1


Peralta: 6-5-3-3-2-8

Soler: 0-4, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_17_burafx_peoafx_1

Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_17_tenaax_biraax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 17, 2012, 11:12:44 pm
Torreyes has a .481 OPS over his last ten games.  Guys get hot and get cold, it happens to everybody. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 17, 2012, 11:28:19 pm
I do hate to say I told you so...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 17, 2012, 11:28:45 pm
Zeke Devoss anyone?

LOL
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 17, 2012, 11:53:19 pm
I do hate to say I told you so...

Then don't say it.

By the way, what did you tell us?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 17, 2012, 11:53:33 pm
I'll still take Torreyes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2012, 12:02:14 am
Dunston: 1-3, BB, 2 E

McNeil: 3-2-0-0-1-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_17_athrok_cubrok_1


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_17_iowaaa_tucaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 18, 2012, 12:08:19 am
Dan Vogelbach has a triple for Boise.  I hope highlights are available that show it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 18, 2012, 12:10:57 am
It was a stand-up triple off the top of the wall in straight away center.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2012, 12:21:05 am
Vogelbach: 3-5, 3B, RBI

Almora: 2-5, 2B, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_17_boiasx_triasx_1


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 18, 2012, 12:32:23 am
CubDen's recap of tonight's action

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/08/cubs-minors-recap-soler-returns-mcneil-with-another-solid-outing/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/08/cubs-minors-recap-soler-returns-mcneil-with-another-solid-outing/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2012, 02:36:28 am
A couple Boise highlights. No Vogelbach, but you can see the batter's eye he keeps hitting in center.


http://www.kndo.com/story/19309622/boise-clinches-series-with-7-6-victory-over-tri-city
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2012, 02:49:38 am
Acosta: 0-4, 4 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_17_dyarok_dchrok_1


Emeterio: 1-4, K,  Only Cubs hit


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_17_dcurok_ddirok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2012, 06:31:40 pm
Araujo: 4-4-1-1-0-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_18_dchrok_dyarok_1


Alcala: 1-2, SB, BB, K

Mejias: 5-2-0-0-3-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_18_ddirok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on August 18, 2012, 09:22:12 pm
Soler 4 for 4 with a HR, 2B and an SB so far tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 18, 2012, 09:25:28 pm
Obviously whatever had him miss a couple of games involves some lingering injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 18, 2012, 10:02:54 pm
Soler: 4-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, SB

Jensen: 5-3-2-1-3-7

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_18_peoafx_wisafx_1


Smokies completed early:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_18_tenaax_biraax_1


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_18_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1



Daytona rained out yet again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 18, 2012, 11:01:05 pm
Cerda is a BB machine.  Too bad he doesn't have some pop.  Any chance he could make a transition to 2B?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 18, 2012, 11:08:03 pm
Soler's up to .391 at Peoria.  Time to get him to Daytona...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 18, 2012, 11:15:50 pm
Cerda is a BB machine.  Too bad he doesn't have some pop.  Any chance he could make a transition to 2B?

Cerda has 219 AB for the Smokies and only has 9 RBI.  How is that even possible?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 18, 2012, 11:19:39 pm
Because he didn't get more hits with runners on base?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 18, 2012, 11:32:16 pm
Didn't Larry Bowa have a season with over 400 ABs and something like 15 RBIs?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2012, 12:03:44 am
Amaya: 1-2, SB, 2 BB, HBP, 2 E

Vogelbach: 1-4, RBI, BB

Arias: 5-1-0-0-1-5

Simpson: 4-1-2-1-1-5


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_18_boiasx_triasx_1


Mesa rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 19, 2012, 12:05:50 am
In 1971 Enzo Hernandez of the Padres had 12 RBIs in 618 plate appearances.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on August 19, 2012, 12:09:12 am
There aren't enough guys named Enzo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 19, 2012, 12:36:39 am
Story on Soler and his 4-5 game


(http://www.milb.com/images/2012/08/18/QCemsYEB.jpg)

Quote
"The best thing he's been doing is that he's been paying attention to the pitcher and how they are pitching to him," Garbey said. "And his pitch selection has been good, and that will help him a lot. He shows great discipline at the plate and great patience, and that's why he's been successful.

"He will move up a little faster than expected if he continues to have a good pitch selection and the same approach he's been showing at the plate and using the whole field. That's the most important thing."

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120818&content_id=36952688&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb (http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120818&content_id=36952688&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2012, 12:44:01 am
More on Soler:

http://www.pjstar.com/sports/x631382783/Capie-Success-is-in-Soler-s-power
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 19, 2012, 01:32:17 am


There aren't enough guys named Enzo.

Watch ReBoot more often.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2012, 02:03:17 am
A few Boise highlights including Shoulders' grand slam which was the first ball hit over the batter's eye in Gesa Field in 8 years:


http://www.kndo.com/story/19313241/tri-city-swept-by-boise
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 19, 2012, 07:07:20 am
Didn't Larry Bowa have a season with over 400 ABs and something like 15 RBIs?

Close.

1984, Bowa's last full season with the Cubs he had 391 AB and only 17 AB.  A couple of other anomolies with Bowa.

Normally we think of walking more often than striking out as a good thing.  Bowa demonstrated that is not always true.  He has more walks than K's each of his 3 full seasons with the Cubs.... and never had an OPS+ above 78.  It was a pathetic 49 in 1984 when he had only 17 RBI.

We think of a roughly .300 BABIP as the norm, with deviations very far from that being unusual, hard to sustain or serious abberations.  Bowa had a BABIP of .237, and he still had 10 steals that season, so he still had some speed.  You would think that with a .237 BABIP he was very slow (but he was 10 and 4 in steals) and hitting lots of very weak groundballs, but he had to have been hitting them at least hard enough for infields to have time to throw him out when he was still moving pretty well.

Though Bowa had three prior seasons had 17 or more sacrifices and led the league once in sacs, as poorly as he was hitting in 1984, he only had 4 sacs all season.

A good reason for that was probably because he batted 8th all year for the Cubs, with only 8 AB in any other spot in the order, and guys hitting 8th don't sac much with the pitcher up next, and anyone on base ahead of him most often being Jody Davis, Ron Cey or Keith Moreland, the three guys who most often hit ahead of Bowa in the order and were each slow enough to allow for a serious play at 2B on many sacrifice efforts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2012, 04:12:16 pm
Soler: 0-4, IBB

Geiger: 1-4, HR, SF, 2 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_19_peoafx_wisafx_1



Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_19_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2012, 05:51:01 pm
Daytona got a whole inning in tonight before being suspended. The second game of their DH was cancelled.


DSL teams and Mesa all off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2012, 07:10:58 pm
Smokies:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_19_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 19, 2012, 08:25:12 pm
Our low minors have some real prospects, but AA and AAA are a barren desert.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 19, 2012, 08:50:31 pm
You cant forget Matt Szczur and Junior Lake.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 19, 2012, 09:16:14 pm
Scott with a for-him typical day.  5 innings, 1 run, only 1 measly K, but only 3 hits.  9/1 GO/AO.  He must have a suspicioiusly low BABIP.  But it must be legit that he's got some good ground-ball stuff that's hard to drive. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 19, 2012, 09:19:24 pm
You cant forget Matt Szczur and Junior Lake.

Deeg can.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 19, 2012, 09:23:54 pm
Cerda with an RBI!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 19, 2012, 09:32:16 pm
You cant forget Matt Szczur and Junior Lake.

Szczur is a legit prospect. 

As for Lake, he has some athletic ability and is relatively young, which makes him worth keeping an eye on, but he's not worth making a big fuss about either. Basically every organization has a Junior Lake or two.  Hopefully he can put things together down the road, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 19, 2012, 10:00:07 pm
Sczur is a legit prospect, though not on the level of our top tier guys in short-season and A ball.  Lake isn't especially noteworthy IMHO, though he has an outside chance to turn into a bench player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 19, 2012, 10:14:13 pm
Amaya: 0-5, 3 K

Almora: 0-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_19_boiasx_yakasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 19, 2012, 11:47:04 pm
As awful as our pitching ranks are, I kinda wish they'd try Lake from the mound.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 20, 2012, 12:00:08 am
Our low minors have some real prospects, but AA and AAA are a barren desert.

While I agree about Iowa, Tennessee has Szczur, Watkins, Ha, Lake, Zych, McNutt, Batista and Struck, who all have a decent chance to be decent major league players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on August 20, 2012, 11:52:59 am
That's a good post, Cubsin.  Who thought Barney would contribute much of anything at the MLB level when he was at AA?

Ryne Sandberg didn't seem like he would be that much when he was in the minors.

Hard to know which guys will continue to progress and how much...and which have hit the ceiling and won't progress at all.

My best guess is that our leaders aren't real thrilled with what we have at AA or AAA, but have high hopes for some guys we don't currently think much of at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 20, 2012, 12:25:00 pm
It was never expected that Sandberg would develop the power that he ultimately did, but at the time the Cubs got him, he was considered to have the potential to be an all star player in the future.  Which is why the Cubs gave one of the better shortstops in the game to get Sandberg.

Barney, not so much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on August 20, 2012, 12:43:48 pm
DaveP, as I recall, it was DeJesus for Bowa because Phils were unable to sign Bowa long term...Sandberg was certainly the lesser player among the three as the Phillies evaluated him as a MLB utility infielder who wouldn't be good enough to play SS in the bigs.

Of course, he started with us at 3B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 20, 2012, 12:48:38 pm
I believe Dallas Green has said that he insisted on Sandberg to be in the trade.  Others within the Phillies organization may not have valued Sandberg as much as Green did. But for his overly large ego (and the limitations of his bosses) he might have led the Cubs to a golden era of sorts.  But then we wouldn't have needed and gotten Theo and Jed to lead the Cubs to the Real Gold Era!  ;)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 20, 2012, 01:34:45 pm
DaveP, as I recall, it was DeJesus for Bowa because Phils were unable to sign Bowa long term...Sandberg was certainly the lesser player among the three as the Phillies evaluated him as a MLB utility infielder who wouldn't be good enough to play SS in the bigs.

Of course, he started with us at 3B.

Ben - go back and look at the papers from the time (they have them in the Chicago Public Library on microfilm).  Bowa was at the end of his career, and DeJesus was considered to be a large upgrade for the Phillies.  Not only was Sandberg the major part of the trade, but the deal was held up for almost two weeks as the Phillies tried to convince the Cubs to take Luis Quinones instead of Sandberg.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on August 20, 2012, 01:38:25 pm
I'll take your word for it, Dave...Ryno sure did turn out to be something quite extraordinary who was a real pleasure to watch! 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on August 20, 2012, 02:43:50 pm
I looked at Bowa's numbers for 1984 recently and was surprised at how bad they were--his ops was .542.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 20, 2012, 02:57:14 pm
The funny thing is that the year before the trade, Bowa was actually pretty good and DeJesus was horrible.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 20, 2012, 03:17:37 pm
Regarding Sandberg and the Phillies/Cubs, in some ways this is a good example of a prospect being available because he is blocked in somebody else's organization. Sandberg was a SS at AAA and Phillies had Juan Samuel in the minors coming up at 2B and Julio Franco at SS in the minors and, of course, Mike Schmidt as the regular at 3B. 

So, with some prodding, Cubs were able to get him.

A year later, Phils traded Franco to the Indians in a multi-player deal for Von Hayes and, of course, Sandberg played 3B for the Cubs the season after the trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 20, 2012, 04:05:26 pm
Ty'Relle Harris is now listed as starting for Iowa tonight instead of Chris Rusin.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2012, 08:11:03 pm


Torrez: 5-4-3-1-0-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_20_dchrok_dgirok_1


DSL1:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_20_dwsrok_dcurok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 20, 2012, 08:38:25 pm
I wonder if Torrez has any potential?  Even in DSL, a guy with a 1.2 ERA seems kinda interesting.  6'3", so you'd hope there might be some velocity/projection left.  4 walks in 70+ innings is unusual control.

Might have no stuff, and it's only strike-throwing that's working now.  But, throwing strikes all the time can be a rare gift, sometimes combined with good fastball (movement as well as speed).  Hard to live on the fastball if it isn't somewhat good, and for 6'3" 18, it could get better.  No K's suggests no breaking stuff.  But sometimes the best candidate to develop good breaking pitches are guys who start off with excellent fastball control. 

You never know with the DSL guys.  Would be fun to have one where we get a report later that he's a promising prospect with a 90's fastball and projection for more.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2012, 08:48:14 pm
There are half a dozen Dominican pitchers that are intriguing based on age and stats. We probably won't get a report on any of them until they pitch in Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Bluebufoon on August 20, 2012, 09:05:23 pm
I know I am a little late on this topic but I am thrilled that Oneri Fleita is no longer in charge of player development or the minor leagues --whatever his title was for the Cubs? The Cub system has under achieved for years and I am thrilled Fleita is gone.  Sorry I had to vent a little, now that's off my chest, I can rest better,
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2012, 09:24:15 pm
Struck: 6 IP, R

Lake: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_20_cngaax_tenaax_1


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 20, 2012, 09:30:24 pm
Between scheduled off days and rainouts, do they average more than 3 playing nights per week down in the FSL?  It seems they hardly ever play. 

Chris, who are the DSL guys you think are the most interesting?  You're probably right, that we won't have much clue for another year who actually has a good chance. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 20, 2012, 09:47:23 pm
I hadn't thought about it until tonight, but with both Jackson and Vitters up with the big team, is there anyone in the system that is worth a September call up?  I suppose that Dolis will come up if healthy, but there isn't the usual slew of marginal relief pitchers, and I can't think of a single position player that might be called up, unless they bring up someone like Blake Lali as a third catcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 20, 2012, 09:51:09 pm
Dave Sappelt might get a look since he's already on the 40 man.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 20, 2012, 09:51:38 pm
Adduci
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2012, 10:04:01 pm
Soler: 0-4, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_20_peoafx_wisafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2012, 10:09:58 pm
Quote
who are the DSL guys you think are the most interesting?

First and foremost the two lefties, Carlos Rodriguez and Jose Paulino. Rodriguez just turned 17 and has been terrific almost all year; great peripherals. Paulino has struggled lately after a fantastic start. At one point he had 32 K's to 2 walks. He's just three months older than Rodriguez.

There are three others who have the type of peripherals that intrigue me:  Righties Alex Santana and Pedro Araujo, and lefty Angel Mejias. All 18 or 19.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2012, 10:16:50 pm
The Vogelbomb drought is over.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 20, 2012, 10:25:39 pm
Valbuena didn't make any points with management with that base running exhibition.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 20, 2012, 10:28:07 pm
Even if he was safe...

If he runs out of the box, instead of flipping the bat and watching it, he beats the throw...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2012, 10:41:48 pm
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_20_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 20, 2012, 11:18:57 pm
Vogelbach with a home run tonight.  Blackburn with a good outing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 20, 2012, 11:43:27 pm
Blackburn: 4-2-0-0-1-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_20_cubrok_pdrrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 12:47:01 am
Vogelbach: 3-4, HR, RBI, BB, E

Bruno: 3-3, 2B, 2 BB, CS, E   ( .371, 1.100+ OPS in August )


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_20_boiasx_yakasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 21, 2012, 07:17:35 am
Yakima had a guy named Jose Jose pitch last night.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 21, 2012, 07:27:24 am
Did he leave his home in Tucson, Arizona?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 21, 2012, 07:37:20 am
Bruno has a BABIP of .417, I think.  He's whiffed quite a bit more than I'd expected, he'll turn 22 this year but he's whiffed a little over 20% (per AB, not PA).  Appears to be rather errorific defensively.  The high BABIP maybe makes his hitting numbers look fluky, but to some degree it may also be a good sign.  Good hitters who have some snap to their swing tend to BABIP well, so maybe it's consistent with his college scouting as just a good hitter. 

Two walks yesterday are interesting.  You'd kinda figure that for him as a 5'9" little guy, that it would be pretty important for him to become a reasonably selective hitter who can boost his OBP with some IsoD.  His walk rate is low, (13walks/209 AB), but that's actually a lot better than his miniscule walk rate in college. 

Looks like he has a chance to be an effective minor-league utility guy.  Can play at various positions (even if he's not good at any of them), can hit, isn't Pierre-weak.  Probably a long-shot to be able to carry it up to the majors, but who knows.  If he'd had his current numbers with a 10% K-rate, I'd be more optimistic.  He could be one of JR's Boise-numbers boys, but we'll see. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 21, 2012, 08:59:48 am
A series of interesting Tweets from Peoria:

@peoriachiefs MLB baseballs have tighter seams...a MLB pitcher would end up with a 15 ft. break with a MiLB ball! Lol!

Bob Bainter ‏@BobBainter
@peoriachiefs had to switch these in and out with Pettite pitching on rehab. You have to feel them to notice difference #notthesameball

Peoria Chiefs ‏@peoriachiefs
Thanks to @BobBainter for the tidbits on the difference between the Milb and MLB balls. Appreciate the info from an umpire!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 21, 2012, 10:47:10 am
Bruno now 2nd in NWL in hitting at .330
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 21, 2012, 10:48:10 am
Dunston .419 (13-31) with 7 BB's and  .526 OBP last 8 games...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 21, 2012, 11:05:14 am
Dunston .419 (13-31) with 7 BB's and  .526 OBP last 8 games...

The shawon-o-meter has become more complicated with the improved sophistication of stats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 21, 2012, 11:29:52 am
Dunston .419 (13-31) with 7 BB's and  .526 OBP last 8 games...

If only his father had walked anywhere close to 10% of the time he went to the plate....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 21, 2012, 11:49:33 am
Yakima had a guy named Jose Jose pitch last night.

He gives up way too many doubles.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 21, 2012, 11:59:01 am
Deeg is no Play2.

Unfortunately, Play2 IS a play2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 21, 2012, 01:29:17 pm
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/14636291-419/cubs-plan-to-move-peoria-chiefs-to-kane-county.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 21, 2012, 01:43:31 pm
Cubs plan to move Class A Peoria Chiefs to Kane County

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/14636291-419/cubs-plan-to-move-peoria-chiefs-to-kane-county.html (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/14636291-419/cubs-plan-to-move-peoria-chiefs-to-kane-county.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 21, 2012, 01:49:02 pm
Seth McClung with seven shutout innings (5 hits, 1 walk, 6 Ks) so far against Memphis.  I-Cubs batting in the bottom of the seventh in a scoreless game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 21, 2012, 01:51:03 pm
Cubs plan to move Class A Peoria Chiefs to Kane County

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/14636291-419/cubs-plan-to-move-peoria-chiefs-to-kane-county.html (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/14636291-419/cubs-plan-to-move-peoria-chiefs-to-kane-county.html)

Baseball America thought this was a possibility when previewing the classification shuffle this offseason.   Peoria's attendance apparently has been sagging pretty badly the last couple of years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on August 21, 2012, 01:51:37 pm
So, Kane County Cubs next year could have Almora, Vogelbach, Candelario, Gioskar, Maples and a pitcher or two from this year (Johnson or Underwood etc)? That won't suck.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 21, 2012, 01:53:57 pm
That might be aggressive for Underwood, but you never know. 

They may not want Pierce Johnson pitching in cold weather next season either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 21, 2012, 01:57:36 pm
The thing that makes me mad about that move is Peoria is scheduled to visit Bowling Green next year, but Kane County probably isn't.  That means another year before I can drive up to go see the Cubs Low-A team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 02:35:49 pm
No way will Underwood start at Peoria. He's still 17 and has struggled pretty badly with command in Mesa. I think Maples is a toss up.

OTOH, I could see Blackburn being there and Scott and Arias definitely will be. Plus Soler.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 21, 2012, 02:41:32 pm
If Soler continues to do decently, I suspect he will start next season in Daytona.

Almora and Vogelbach are very likely, along with Arias and Amaya.  I would think that Johnson would be there unless they hold him in EST for a month or so until the weather warms up.  Candelario should also be there.  Kane County should have a team worth watching.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 02:52:08 pm
I don't. I think Soler starts in Kane County. He's still young, raw and without much in the way of baseball reps. Why put him in a very tough league for hitters when he's had so few at-bats? He can always move up to Daytona later in the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 02:54:44 pm
Soler: 3-4, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_21_peoafx_wisafx_1


The Cubs should've tried to pawn Dempster off for Shelby Miller before Miller got hot. Likely would've been laughed at though I suppose.


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_21_mrbaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 21, 2012, 03:15:37 pm
Soler hits:  4 hits, then 0-4, 0-4, then 3-4.  Kind of bouncy. 



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 21, 2012, 03:17:07 pm
I'll be very surprised if Soler doesn't start the season at Daytona next year.  He might even get a cup of coffee for a few games before this season ends.  There's no sign whatsoever he's overmatched at Peoria - he isn't striking out a ton, he's drawing some walks.  Plus he's plenty old enough for high-A.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 03:26:45 pm
He's old enough in the age sense but very young in terms of baseball experience and repetition. His sample size in Peoria is very small at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 21, 2012, 03:40:58 pm
I'm sure Soler will eventually have to learn to deal with Chicago's weather in April and May, but I suspect he'd prefer to be in sunny Florida next Spring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 21, 2012, 03:41:01 pm
Soler hits:  4 hits, then 0-4, 0-4, then 3-4.  Kind of bouncy. 

Kinda depends on what those 0-4s consisted of.  Weak grounders, hard line drives at someone, long flyballs caught near the wall?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 03:43:34 pm
Quote
but I suspect he'd prefer to be in sunny Florida next Spring.

I'd rather be somewhere where every other game isn't rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 21, 2012, 03:46:27 pm
April and May are not usually very rainy in Florida.  That come more in July and August.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 21, 2012, 04:47:36 pm
Fearless prediction:  Kane County will play a game at Wrigley each season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 21, 2012, 06:41:40 pm
The Daytona Cubs visit Clearwater and Clearwater has their first rainout of the year.  DH tomorrow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 21, 2012, 06:47:48 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Btfsplk
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 21, 2012, 09:00:08 pm
Baez is 1 for 2 in Mesa today.  They have either demoted Javier or promoted Jeffrey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 21, 2012, 09:02:50 pm
It's Jeffrey.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 21, 2012, 09:30:33 pm
Pierce Johnson tossin' the tater for Boise tonight.  Amaya with a HR in the first.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 10:52:21 pm
Zych: 2-0-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_21_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 11:15:47 pm
Dunston: 2-3, SF, RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_21_mrnrok_cubrok_1


DSL1:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_21_dcurok_dwsrok_1


DSL2 suspended.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 11:35:01 pm
Underwood: 3-0-0-0-1-3,  5-0 GO/FO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_21_cubrok_mrnrok_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 21, 2012, 11:52:26 pm
Amaya: 3-4, HR, 2 RBI, HBP

Vogelbach: 0-2, 2 BB, HBP

Johnson: 2-3-3-3-1-2,  2 WP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_21_boiasx_yakasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 22, 2012, 11:23:43 am
Quote
Tennessee Smokies manager Buddy Bailey meets with the media following Tennessee's 3-1 loss to the Chattanooga Lookouts in 11 innings on August 21, 2012 at Smokies Park.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=AGOeH1de8Dc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=AGOeH1de8Dc#t=0s)

Starting at about the fifty second mark are some very positive comments on Tony Zych.


Note:  Zych is pronounced Zick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 22, 2012, 12:14:52 pm
Quote from: Carrie Muskat
Peoria Chiefs president Rocky Vonachen says they were “caught off guard” by reports that the Cubs may switch their Midwest League affiliate from Peoria to Kane County. No announcement was expected until mid September at the earliest. Major League teams and Minor League teams face hefty fines for publicly discussing future re-affiliation agreements. Negotiations outside of the existing relationship cannot begin until Sept. 16. The Chiefs have a seven-game home stand remaining, starting Saturday. They close the season at Kane County. The only Midwest League team with a player development contract (PDC) for next year is Wisconsin with the Brewers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 22, 2012, 08:18:31 pm
Baez: 0-3, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_dbcafa_clrafa_1


Baez: 0-3, K

Torreyes: 3-3, RBI, PO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_dbcafa_clrafa_2



Rodriguez: 6-3-2-2-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_dcurok_drdrok_1


Malave: 1-4, 2 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_dwarok_dchrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 22, 2012, 08:53:38 pm
Another fine day for the organization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 22, 2012, 09:48:09 pm


Szczur: 1-4, 3B, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_cngaax_tenaax_1



Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 22, 2012, 11:01:57 pm
Ben Wells obviously didn't have TJ surgery because he pitched for Mesa tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 22, 2012, 11:04:33 pm
That's a very positive development.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 22, 2012, 11:11:58 pm
Dunston: 2-3, K

McNeil: 4-5-0-0-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_diarok_cubrok_1



Wells: 1-0-0-0-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_diarok_cubrok_2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 22, 2012, 11:36:50 pm
Soler: 2-6, RBI, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_peoafx_belafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2012, 01:27:40 am
Bruno: 3-6, 2 RBI, K

Vogelbach: 1-4, 2 BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_22_boiasx_vanasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 23, 2012, 03:09:38 am
In the box score for the DSL Cubs1 game, Manuel Fuentes apparently pitched to zero batters. Was he eaten by a bear or something during his warmups?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2012, 03:36:50 am
AzPhil:

Quote
Peoria RHP Ben Wells (sprained elbow) opted to postpone TJS in the hope that his elbow would heal with rest
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2012, 03:46:55 am
Never know if his father would embellish, but nice news if accurate:


Quote
Maples’ father, Tim, said that Dillon’s fastball was clocked at 97 miles per hour and his breaking pitch at 83.


http://www.thepilot.com/news/2012/aug/22/maples-makes-debut-rookie-league/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 23, 2012, 07:59:58 am
Quote
Peoria RHP Ben Wells (sprained elbow) opted to postpone TJS in the hope that his elbow would heal with rest

Obviously I'm not a doctor, but that doesn't sound like very good news.  I'm assuming the doctors said his ligament tear wasn't that significant and could be rehabbed.  Still, if he's this young and he already has significant fraying of his elbow ligament, it seems like he would have been better off just getting the Tommy John out of the way now instead of having it come up in next year, two years, five years, etc. 

Just look at Arodys Vizcaino, for instance.  He decided to wait and try to rehab his first elbow injury, but he wound up needing Tommy John a year later anyway.

It just seems like if you're having UCL issues already at age 19, it's not very smart to postpone the inevitable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 23, 2012, 08:04:18 am
Plus for him, it's been a lost year of development anyway.  If you're going to miss most of this season anyway, just go ahead and have the surgery.

Just too bad Hendry decided to guarantee him a 40 man roster spot after this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 23, 2012, 08:40:30 am
In the box score for the DSL Cubs1 game, Manuel Fuentes apparently pitched to zero batters. Was he eaten by a bear or something during his warmups?
There was a caught stealing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 23, 2012, 10:55:58 am
There was a caught stealing.

Oops, missed that. Thanks, Cactus.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 23, 2012, 12:53:08 pm
Obviously I'm not a doctor, but that doesn't sound like very good news.  I'm assuming the doctors said his ligament tear wasn't that significant and could be rehabbed.  Still, if he's this young and he already has significant fraying of his elbow ligament, it seems like he would have been better off just getting the Tommy John out of the way now instead of having it come up in next year, two years, five years, etc. 

Just look at Arodys Vizcaino, for instance.  He decided to wait and try to rehab his first elbow injury, but he wound up needing Tommy John a year later anyway.

It just seems like if you're having UCL issues already at age 19, it's not very smart to postpone the inevitable.

I thought the same thing.  I assume he got medical input, and I assume the Cubs gave some input as well.  So the fact that he didn't do the TJ hopefully means there was some reason to think it might work.  And I would hope that the Cubs gave some honest input and that it factored into the decision.  So I'm hesitant to assume that the decision ended up being clearly wrong or ill-informed. 

But I certainly thought just what you said, that I don't remember many guys with bad elbows resting them and going on to become big-league workhorses.  And as you said, this year is pretty much shot anyway.  If he'd had in back in May, by next year he could be pretty far along in his rehab.  Fair chance that it won't hold up next year, and it will be a much longer time. 

It's awfully hard to become a successful big-league pitcher.  Hard enough for the healthiest of guys.  Working with a sub-optimal elbow can't help. 


But, hopefully it really was negligible, rest really did address it, and he'll now go onto a career-long effective regimen of strengthening exercises that will work and give it more strength/stability than it ever had before.  And he'll go on to become a super winner on our string of repeat world-series championships. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2012, 02:31:29 pm
BA has a post up on 2013 draft prospect Willie Abreu that contains a mention of Abreu's former HS teammate Albert Almora.


Quote
The idea of patrolling the same outfield as Almora would create more exposure for Abreu while also playing for a better program and against stronger competition.

“(Almora) was max-effort in everything he did, on and off the field,” Abreu said. “I try to approach everything the same way.

“He’s a phenomenal defender. Anyone that’s ever played with him could learn something just by watching him shag fly balls.”


http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/high-school/2012/08/abreu-follows-almoras-path/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 23, 2012, 02:40:57 pm
Did Smoltz have surgery on his elbow, or did he do it on rest and rehabilitation?  I remember that they put him in the bullpen to reduce stress on his elbow for a while before putting him back in the rotation, but I don't remember if he had TJ surgery about that time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2012, 02:44:35 pm
Smoltz had two surgeries including Tommy John.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 23, 2012, 03:09:42 pm
But, hopefully it really was negligible, rest really did address it, and he'll now go onto a career-long effective regimen of strengthening exercises that will work and give it more strength/stability than it ever had before.  And he'll go on to become a super winner on our string of repeat world-series championships. 

Sad to see, but it appears Craig is doing drugs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 23, 2012, 07:38:29 pm
.159 w/ an obp of .196 for Baez so far at Daytona.

Szczur .202 w/ an obp of .269 at Peoria.

Almora .242 avg/obp at Boise.

Yasiel Balaguert has been terrible at all levels.
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=LF&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=622017

Go Cubs!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on August 23, 2012, 07:39:46 pm
What the heck is Saunders doing at Peoria?

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=&sid=t450&t=p_pbp&pid=623502

I get it, they want to push Baez, but Saunders deserves better.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 23, 2012, 07:55:32 pm
Soler .341 with a .923 ops at Peoria

Baes .333 with a .929 ops at Peoria

Vogelbach .333 with a 1.086 at Boise

Go Cubs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 23, 2012, 09:03:28 pm
I wonder where Michael Jensen will stack in the prospect ratings this winter?  Just a guy?  Or a fairly interesting prospect?  He'll be 11-5 after today, if the bullpen holds up.   NOthing sensational about the guy.  3.38 ERA, nothing great.  WHIP around 1.24 or so, nothing great.  Around 115K/140 IP nothing great.  6 HR/140 innings, nothing great.  40 walks, nothing great.  21 years old in A-, nothing great. 

Still, he's been relatively consistent, solid control, and it is only his first pro year.  Probably not real projectable, velocity-wise.  But I kind of like him.  Hopefully he'll have some improvement left in him. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2012, 09:23:37 pm
Baez: 0-3, SB, BB, K

Whitenack: 3-3-3-1-0-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_23_dbcafa_clrafa_1



Kirk: 4-2/3 -4-4-4-5-6

Lake: 1-2, 2B, RBI, 2 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_23_cngaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 23, 2012, 09:58:17 pm
I wonder where Michael Jensen will stack in the prospect ratings this winter?  Just a guy?  Or a fairly interesting prospect?  He'll be 11-5 after today, if the bullpen holds up.   NOthing sensational about the guy.  3.38 ERA, nothing great.  WHIP around 1.24 or so, nothing great.  Around 115K/140 IP nothing great.  6 HR/140 innings, nothing great.  40 walks, nothing great.  21 years old in A-, nothing great. 

Still, he's been relatively consistent, solid control, and it is only his first pro year.  Probably not real projectable, velocity-wise.  But I kind of like him.  Hopefully he'll have some improvement left in him. 



I have him at # 20 currently.  Anyone that has him higher or lower is clearly wrong.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 23, 2012, 09:58:30 pm
Maples walks four in the second and gets pulled mid-inning. 

Hayden Simpson gets a start for Boise. 

Jeimer Candelerio's OPS is now down into low .720's.  Average down to .274, and he's slugging .385.  Very few XBH.  Without his hot week early where he hit 3 HR's in a couple of days, his power output would be kind of Theriot-esque. 

Burke good outing.  Haven't seen much of him, and now he's not starting anymore. 

HR McNutt had allowed 12 HR's over his first 70 innings, but now has gone around 20 innings without any HR's.  He's had three straight innings without a run.  Would be interesting if he rediscovered something of what made him interesting at one time.  Tons of walks, though. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 23, 2012, 10:19:48 pm
Soler: 1-4, 2B, RBI, K

Jensen: 6-2-1-1-0-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_23_peoafx_belafx_1


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_23_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 23, 2012, 10:35:04 pm
McNutt as a starter 66.2 IP, 73 H, 31 BB, 40 K.  As a reliever 23 IP, 18 H, 21 K, 14 BB.  In August  11 IP, 4 H, 8 BB, 9 K, 3 R, 2 ER.  Still too many walks, but he at least seems to missing bats again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 23, 2012, 10:51:49 pm
Quote
As a reliever 23 IP, 18 H, 21 K, 14 BB.  In August  11 IP, 4 H, 8 BB, 9 K, 3 R, 2 ER

He's turned into the Carlos Marmol of the Southern League.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 23, 2012, 11:42:55 pm
Quote
Jeimer Candelerio's OPS is now down into low .720's. Average down to .274, and he's slugging .385. Very few XBH. Without his hot week early where he hit 3 HR's in a couple of days, his power output would be kind of Theriot-esque.

Boise stats don't mean much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 24, 2012, 12:08:20 am
They do if they support a position you have taken.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on August 24, 2012, 12:22:10 am
In the event Chris has gone to bed with Boise still in progress, there's some good news:

Almora with 4 hits (2 doubles),

Vogelbach and Bruno each with a single and a double.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2012, 12:25:12 am
Vogelbach: 2-5, 2B, IBB, K, E

Almora: 4-5, 2 2B, 2 RBI

Simpson: 5-6-3-3-2-7


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_23_boiasx_vanasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2012, 01:03:01 am
Dunston: 2-6, 2B, RBI, SB, BB

Maples: 1-2/3 - 0-4-4-4-1, 2 WP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_23_cubrok_diarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 24, 2012, 01:18:57 am
not exactly good pitching Almora faced today but ya gotta hit the bad if you want to hit the good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 24, 2012, 01:27:46 am
Juan Paniagua debuts.  Two scoreless innings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2012, 02:00:41 am

DSL1:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_23_drdrok_dcurok_1


DSL2:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_23_dchrok_dwarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2012, 02:01:51 am
They had Paniagua's old name Juan Collado on there before.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 24, 2012, 05:43:55 am
If i was Juan Paniagua, I'd try and get suspended one more 'gain.  17,000 from Diamondback, 1.1 milllion from Yankees, and now 1.5 million from the Cubbies.  Another suspension, and he might break 2 million.

My question is why was the Yankees contract voided and he suspended again.  Googled and looked thru quite a few pages but all I found was no one really knew why, just that it happened.  I mean, why falsify documents again, if it was, indeed, that.  Makes no sense.

One would hope with his age, he could be a fast mover.  But, he has less experience that someone his age generally has, so are we looking at having to wait 4-5 years for his arrival? 

Cubs really need a couple pitching prospects to get on the fast tract, and there really aren't very many possibilities.  Certainly doesn't look like Maples will be.  While he may have great stuff, he can't even find the area around the plate right now.  Hopefully Vizcaino comes back strong, but he's probably a bullpen option next year and may never be more because of his size(tho the same thing was thought about Pedro Martinez at one time).  If the Cubs trade Garza this off-season, they really need two rotation ready prospects, with one hopefully having front of the rotation potential.  Otherwise, it's Samardzija and Garza and pray for rain.

Delgado may never be more than a number 3 or 4 starter, but that's looking good right about now if the Dempster deal could have went thru.(though I personally like Villanueva and think he will be the better long term player).  We got more than I ever dreamed for Maholm, so it's probably best it worked out the way it did anyway. 

just musing out loud.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on August 24, 2012, 06:08:34 am
Simpson's longest outing...ever?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 24, 2012, 06:53:26 am
Hopefully Vizcaino comes back strong, but he's probably a bullpen option next year and may never be more because of his size(tho the same thing was thought about Pedro Martinez at one time). 

I forget which, but Theo or Jed said that using Vizcaino as a starter was more consistent with the rehab plan because of the consistency of being in the rotation and the rest between starts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 24, 2012, 07:14:52 am
They do if they support a position you have taken.

You mean if they support the position that Boise stats don't mean much?

Well yeah, I do think they support that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 24, 2012, 07:37:04 am
I forget which, but Theo or Jed said that using Vizcaino as a starter was more consistent with the rehab plan because of the consistency of being in the rotation and the rest between starts.

Would that be the minors or majors, however?  I could see doing that in the minors and it makes sense, but does that mean the majors is out of the question next year?  You can't really have pitch counts of 80 or so every fifth day there taking it easy on a young arm.  I would think if he was promoted and had a strict, smaller pitch count, it would have to be as a reliever....of course i could be wrong about that.  I'm often wrong, in fact.

edit-wow, 500 posts...do i get a plaque now, or is that a 1000?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 24, 2012, 08:56:32 am
I think that would obviously be in the minors.  I certainly wouldn't expect him to be participating in the majors early in the season. 

If he's on the Strasburg kind of deal, and he's slowly building himself up in the minors.  perhaps by July or August he'd be qualified to be a 90-pitch 5-inning big-league starter.  But the workup would probably need to have been gradual enough so that his total workload would not end up being excessive. 

I guess I've been seeing him as a 2014 guy, not really much of a factor for 2013 big-leagues wise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 24, 2012, 09:18:24 am
I think that would obviously be in the minors.  I certainly wouldn't expect him to be participating in the majors early in the season. 

If he's on the Strasburg kind of deal, and he's slowly building himself up in the minors.  perhaps by July or August he'd be qualified to be a 90-pitch 5-inning big-league starter.  But the workup would probably need to have been gradual enough so that his total workload would not end up being excessive. 

I guess I've been seeing him as a 2014 guy, not really much of a factor for 2013 big-leagues wise.

You're right, of course, but it just seems for major league ready, "fragile" guys, it's been easier for them to come out of the bullpen, ala Smoltz, etc.  So, I guess the main question would be when the staff considered him major league ready.  He pitched in 17 big league games in 2011, had control issues and was less than effective.  He probably is best off being a 2013 minor league guy all year and then maybe a September call up since that wouldn't affect his fa status.  It really would be nice if he turned into a frontline starter and showed he could handle the workload in 2014.  I guess one positive is it gives the Cubs more spots to wade through trash looking for diamonds in the rough 2013.  I think that's a positive?  I'm looking for anything here....anything?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 24, 2012, 09:25:04 am
...maybe a September call up since that wouldn't affect his fa status.

Not true.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 24, 2012, 09:42:13 am
Not true.

It would?  i figured 17 ip the year before so we wouldn't have to worry bout added year...tho i guess if he is on major league dl the whole year that changes everything...forgot about that.  My bad.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 24, 2012, 09:54:49 am
I believe that the Nationals used both Zimmerman and Strasburg starters only after their TJ surgeries.  Those both seem to have worked out pretty well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 24, 2012, 10:03:05 am
I believe that the Nationals used both Zimmerman and Strasburg starters only after their TJ surgeries.  Those both seem to have worked out pretty well.

Good point, too...I was picturing the controlled tommy john start recoveries the cubs generally employ, like Whitenack.  2-3-4 innings a start.  I think he's gone 5 innings one time in 15 starts.  Though he does a 5.96 era, so maybe not the best test case. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2012, 11:26:33 am
Quote
Major League Baseball has approved Juan Carlos Paniagua's $1.5 million deal with the Cubs, one year after terminating his $1.1 million deal with the Yankees that he signed using the same age and the same name.

According to a source familiar with the situation, MLB ruled Paniagua's age undetermined, a decision that put the onus on the Cubs of whether to continue forward with the contract. Paniagua received his visa from the U.S. Consulate and made his first start for the Cubs yesterday in the Rookie-level Arizona League, where he threw two scoreless innings of relief with one walk and one strikeout.

Paniagua, a 22-year-old Dominican righthander who signed with the Cubs last month, has had two previous pro contracts terminated despite using the same date of birth (April 4, 1990) to sign every time. Paniagua originally signed with the Diamondbacks for $17,000 in May 2009 as Juan Carlos Collado, pitched in 2009 and part of 2010 in the Dominican Summer League on a pending contract, but his contract was terminated due to fraudulent paperwork.

He was declared ineligible to sign for one year, then signed with the Yankees for $1.1 million in 2011 as Juan Carlos Paniagua, but MLB terminated that contract due to what the league called "falsified documents." Paniagua was again declared ineligible to sign for one year, then signed with the Cubs on July 19 once his penalty ended using the same name and the same age he used to sign with the Yankees.

Paniagua had touched 98 mph back in 2011, but more recent reports—including a May workout in Puerto Rico—have had him around 93-95 mph. His changeup has long been his No. 2 pitch but he has shown an improved 81-84 mph slider over the past year. Since Paniagua signed his contract after July 2, his bonus will count against Chicago's $2.9 million international bonus pool for the 2012-13 signing period.



http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/08/mlb-approves-juan-carlos-paniaguas-deal-with-cubs/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 24, 2012, 12:13:11 pm


http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/08/mlb-approves-juan-carlos-paniaguas-deal-with-cubs/

Thank you, Chris.  I spent 15-20 minutes looking through googled pages for that.  Most everything that came up was right when it happened and there were some falsified document speculation but nothing concrete.

One would hope for the Cubs to give a 22 year old with that little experience that much money, they believe he'll be able to do move pretty fast.  I had mistakenly thought he was 20.  But he's missed out on a lot of pitching experience either way, so kind of hard to predict.  I guess even if he does move slower than we'd like, it'd still be faster than a 16 year old.  Sounds like the guy could be 30 though, and no one would know.  Can't be too many guys in baseball with an undetermined age.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 24, 2012, 12:21:13 pm
Have the Cubs signed any International free agents this year other than de la Rosa and Paniagua? I'm assuming they must have, but I haven't seen any other names mentioned.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 24, 2012, 12:23:10 pm
Heh, that's interesting.  So for all we know he might be 26 or whatever. 

Ray, service time is service time, as I think you know.  So you are right that given his existing service time from last year, that his a September callup would not be be enough to bump him over a year of service time.  So if he had .4 years of service, and september moves him to .55 years of service, it probably wouldn't matter. 

But yes, I certainly agree with you that next year he'd be doing the Whitenack thing.  And doing it in the minors.  He was on the edge of big-league ready last year, but was too wild then.  He really wasn't quite ready then, and having a surgery and a rehab will reduce his baseball readiness.  His command will go backwards, and his velocity will be reduced, and he may well be banned from throwing certain pitches for at least a while, so just in terms of baseball development he'll be even less prepared than he was last summer.  Combine baseball unreadiness with physical unreadiness, and it seems a no-brainer that he'll be working in the minors next season, at least to start.  Or perhaps Mesa for a while before he even gets to box-score minors.  Just like with Whitenack. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 24, 2012, 12:26:40 pm
"According to a source familiar with the situation, MLB ruled Paniagua's age undetermined, a decision that put the onus on the Cubs"

Oh, yes.  This will turn out well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 24, 2012, 12:32:48 pm
Thank you, Chris.  I spent 15-20 minutes looking through googled pages for that.  Most everything that came up was right when it happened and there were some falsified document speculation but nothing concrete.

One would hope for the Cubs to give a 22 year old with that little experience that much money, they believe he'll be able to do move pretty fast.  I had mistakenly thought he was 20.  But he's missed out on a lot of pitching experience either way, so kind of hard to predict.  I guess even if he does move slower than we'd like, it'd still be faster than a 16 year old.  Sounds like the guy could be 30 though, and no one would know.  Can't be too many guys in baseball with an undetermined age.

I don't think a 22-year-old needs to be handled as cautiously physically as a 17-year-old. 
1.  So in terms of workload, I assume he could handle more and thus work faster. 
2.  I would hope that while being suspended for the past several years, that he's continued to throw and work on his change and slider and command.  The distance from the mound to the plate is the same distance in some practice facility or agent camp as in a minor-league game.  So it's possible that his stuff and command have experienced a bunch of the growth that a normal signee would have while getting age 22. 
3.  Still, he hasn't faced many hitters.  His actual game experience is little more than a 17-year-old, and his actual success back in the DSL or in the Panama league or whatever where he pitched this winter was poor. 
4.  I'm not sure that for a guy who has faced so few live game hitters, that we should expect him to learn or move faster than other equally inexperienced guys, even if they are several years younger.  Being older doesn't necessarily make you learn faster. 
5.  The years of club control don't depend on age.  I see no reason to "fast track" him.  Use the same patience that would be involved to optimize the development.  If he comes up when he's 26, and doesn't reach his first free agency till he's 33, that's OK.  If he's been developed optimally and can give you really good rotation years from 26-32 at club-controlled prices, that's better than fast tracking him up to arrive at 24, but then he's not really that ready, and needs to pitch relief or uses a bunch of the cheap controlled years learning how to pitch, and only gets good when he's arbing. 

I know the vacuum on the big team makes us want pitching prospects to become available soon.  But I think the team really needs to just use optimal individualized development time, unrushed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 24, 2012, 12:57:41 pm
Quote
Heh, that's interesting.  So for all we know he might be 26 or whatever. 

I guess Theo is thinking, even if he is 26, he still can't possibly be a worse signing than Gerardo Concepcion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 24, 2012, 01:11:24 pm
I wouldn't be surprised to see both Vizcaino and Paniagua starting games for the Cubs next season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 24, 2012, 01:14:12 pm
If you're signing someone of an unspecified age who hasn't faced much live competition recently, I would think you make tht scouting decision based on present ability rather than future projection.

Let's hope the Cubs did so, anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 24, 2012, 01:15:28 pm
I wouldn't be surprised to see both Vizcaino and Paniagua starting games for the Cubs next season.

I definitely would be with Paniagua.  You just never know how the players from the Dominican are going to develop or how good they really are until they get to the States.  The list of Dominican players getting large signing bonuses, and the accompanying glowing BA scouting reports from the Dominican, isn't a great one.   He hasn't even faced college level competition yet, so that's going to be a tremendous jump going from having never faced any kind of quality competition to making it to the majors, even if the scouting reports turn out to be as good as advertised.

He might even show that he's not good enough to escape Kane County next year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 24, 2012, 01:18:32 pm
Paniagua wants to pitch in the bigs next year because he promised his grandkids.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 24, 2012, 01:45:04 pm
Q & A with Jim Callis on Cubs prospects

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/08/q-a-with-jim-callis-on-cubs-prospects/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/08/q-a-with-jim-callis-on-cubs-prospects/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 24, 2012, 02:59:50 pm
Thanks, Cactus.  Callis is usually a pretty measured guy, and his analyses tend to be skeptical without being cynical.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 24, 2012, 03:59:36 pm
6-0 Hawks in Vancouver

Boise Top of the 2nd
Xavier Batista walks.
Albert Almora singles on a line drive to center fielder Ian Parmley. Xavier Batista to 2nd.
Marco Hernandez singles on a line drive to left fielder Matt Newman. Xavier Batista to 3rd. Albert Almora to 2nd.
Darien Martin singles on a fly ball to right fielder Carlos Ramirez. Xavier Batista scores. Albert Almora to 3rd. Marco Hernandez to 2nd.
Lance Rymel singles on a line drive to center fielder Ian Parmley. Albert Almora scores. Marco Hernandez scores. Darien Martin to 3rd.
Gioskar Amaya walks. Lance Rymel to 2nd.
Stephen Bruno grounds into a force out, third baseman Kellen Sweeney to second baseman Christian Lopes. Darien Martin scores. Lance Rymel to 3rd. Gioskar Amaya out at 2nd. Stephen Bruno to 1st.
With Jeimer Candelario batting, wild pitch by Kyle Anderson, Lance Rymel scores. Stephen Bruno to 2nd.
Jeimer Candelario grounds out, third baseman Kellen Sweeney to first baseman Balbino Fuenmayor.
Daniel Vogelbach walks.
Pitching Change: Zack Breault replaces Kyle Anderson.
With Xavier Batista batting, wild pitch by Zack Breault, Stephen Bruno to 3rd. Daniel Vogelbach to 2nd.
Xavier Batista walks.
With Albert Almora batting, wild pitch by Zack Breault, Stephen Bruno scores.
Albert Almora grounds out, shortstop Jorge Flores to first baseman Balbino Fuenmayor.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 24, 2012, 04:24:22 pm
The steroids obviously didn't help this guy.

Quote
Tigers minor league right fielder D.J. Driggers batted just .160/.240/.234 in 94 at-bats for the Rookie-level Gulf Coast League club following his selection in the 22nd round of the year's draft. The 20-year-old Middle Georgia JC product tested positive for a metabolite of Drostanolone and will sit for 50 games without pay, assuming Detroit doesn't release him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 24, 2012, 04:32:38 pm
heh

Yeah, you know you need to retire early.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 24, 2012, 05:28:01 pm
Cubs really need a couple pitching prospects to get on the fast tract, and there really aren't very many possibilities.  Certainly doesn't look like Maples will be.  While he may have great stuff, he can't even find the area around the plate right now.  Hopefully Vizcaino comes back strong, but he's probably a bullpen option next year and may never be more because of his size(tho the same thing was thought about Pedro Martinez at one time).  If the Cubs trade Garza this off-season, they really need two rotation ready prospects, with one hopefully having front of the rotation potential.  Otherwise, it's Samardzija and Garza and pray for rain.

You are forgetting Hayden Simpson and Gerardo Concepcion.

Those two guys are going to finally be healthy in February and will probably break camp with the Cubs.

Likely dualing for the ROY all season long.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2012, 06:52:33 pm
Almora: 2-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_24_boiasx_vanasx_1


Baez: 1-3, RBI

Villanueva: 2-3, 2B, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_19_tbyafa_dbcafa_1


Villanueva: 1-3, HR, RBI, BB

Hendricks: 5-3-2-2-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_24_dbcafa_tbyafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 24, 2012, 06:55:59 pm
Jeimer Candelario ended his 0-22 string as Boise blew their 6-0 led and lost 7-6.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 24, 2012, 07:15:25 pm
Gotta love our future pitching!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 24, 2012, 07:19:45 pm
Gotta love our future pitching!

It has to be better than our current pitching. Doesn't it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 24, 2012, 08:42:11 pm
It has to be better than our current pitching. Doesn't it?

Sadly, no.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on August 24, 2012, 09:13:16 pm
My offense-only major league comparison for Albert Almora:  Nomar Garciaparra.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 24, 2012, 09:25:19 pm
My offense-only major league comparison for Albert Almora:  Nomar Garciaparra.

I could see that....i've been trying to figure out who he would compare to in a best case scenario and that is as good a comp as any....that with good glove defense would be good player, especially if he uses the steroids, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2012, 09:54:37 pm
Quote
My offense-only major league comparison for Albert Almora:  Nomar Garciaparra.


You don't fool me. You're saying Almora's destined to get hurt repeatedly and have his career decline precipitously before being traded.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 24, 2012, 09:55:01 pm
Almora has 2 walks in 117 AB.  He's making Baez look like a walkaholic. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2012, 09:59:23 pm
Geiger: 2-3, HR, 2 RBI, BB

Soler: DNP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_24_peoafx_belafx_1


Szczur: 2-4, HR, RBI, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_24_mobaax_tenaax_1


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_24_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 24, 2012, 10:20:17 pm
Mesa off,  DSL teams rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 25, 2012, 08:41:24 am
Quote from: Bleacher Nation

The Tennessee Smokies piled on the runs in the third inning of Friday night’s game, but it almost did not happen. To be honest, it should not have happened.

With two outs in the third and Matthew Szczur on first, Logan Watkins lined one into the outfield. Szczur turned for home, and as the throw came into the plate it was clear Szczur was going to be safe by a mile. The catcher fielded the ball a few feet in front of the plate and, as Szczur was crossing home, turned his attention to holding Watkins at second.

Meanwhile, Szczur did not touch home. As he ran across the plate he stepped right over the bag, and the umpire noticed. Szczur immediately circled back around, touched the plate, received an acknowledgement from the umpire, and trotted into the dugout (where he was no doubt harassed for missing the plate). More to the point, the catcher still had the ball when Szczur missed the plate. Had the BayBear’s catcher (or pitcher, who should have been backing up the play) been paying attention, Szczur would almost certainly have been tagged out, the run would not have counted, and the inning would have been over in embarrassing fashion for the home team.

As things turned out, though, Szczur was the first of seven Smokies who would cross the plate that inning. Even worse for Mobile, Tennessee’s margin of win was six runs. If that catcher had been paying attention and tagged Szczur out, Mobile might have won the game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 25, 2012, 10:09:48 am
Would be interesting to hear Szczur explain what happened.

Was he merely expecting to need to slide, and then when he didn't need to he came in standing up without thinking about adjusting his stride or his last step to hit the plate?  Will he perhaps go ahead and slide in the future even when the play is not at all close in order to avoid a repeat?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 25, 2012, 12:27:42 pm
Quote
@BruceMiles2112 Bruce, anyone with a radar gun at Juan Carlos Paniagua's (the player to be named later) debut at Mesa?
 Hide conversation
 Reply  Retweet  Favorite
10:23 AM - 25 Aug 12 via web · Details
1m Bruce Miles ‏@BruceMiles2112
 I'm sure there was, but they wouldn't likely tell us
Expand
 Reply  Retweet 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2012, 09:32:58 pm
Struck: 7-6-2-1-2-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_25_mobaax_tenaax_1


Baez: 0-3, RBI, BB, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_25_dbcafa_tbyafa_1


Baez: 1-3, 2B, 2 K

Torreyes: 2-4, 3B, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_25_dbcafa_tbyafa_2


Soler: 0-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_25_wisafx_peoafx_1


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_25_orhaaa_iowaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 25, 2012, 10:32:40 pm
Vogelbach 2-3 with a double so far tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 25, 2012, 10:34:33 pm
Justin Marra is 0-2 for the moment, but he's hitting .333, and has an OBP of around .450.  LH teenage catcher.  No idea if he has any defense or projects any power.  But not bad. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 25, 2012, 10:41:06 pm
Almora left the game after stepping on 1st base awkwardly and limping to the dugout.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2012, 12:44:17 am
Candelario: 3-5, 2 2B, 3 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_25_boiasx_vanasx_1


Dunston: 1-4, 2B, 3 RBI, BB, 2 K

Blackburn: 3-4-3-3-2-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_25_giarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2012, 03:41:48 pm
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_26_orhaaa_iowaaa_1


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2012, 05:43:40 pm
Soler: 2-5, 2B, 2 RBI, K

Geiger: 3-4, 3 RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_26_wisafx_peoafx_1


Candelario: 2-3, BB, E

Almora: DNP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_26_boiasx_vanasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2012, 06:34:59 pm
Szczur: 1-3, BB

McNutt: 2-1-0-0-0-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_26_mobaax_tenaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 26, 2012, 10:13:24 pm
Keith Law on twitter, "Cubs RHP Juan Carlos Paniagua making his second pro appearance tonight- 92-94 with an above avg slider.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 26, 2012, 10:32:04 pm
Trevor Gretzky has made Theriot look like a power hitter, but he's now hitting .291.  Certainly no power, no future.  But hitting for average is a good first step for a guy who by most accounts was very raw and very inexperienced at best, and after being hurt for an extended time had even less worthwhile experience.  Long shot, but I'm hoping the power will step up.  Perhaps he should be a Camp Colvin guy. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 26, 2012, 10:43:20 pm
keithlaw ‏@keithlaw
91-92, curve inconsistent, command poor "@Jeffster130: @keithlaw Mind if I ask how Underwood did?"

Paniagua 94-97 in his second inning of work and the velocity was easy like Sunday morning
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 26, 2012, 11:02:29 pm
Yes, but Paniagua's pitching against kids fifteen, twenty years younger than him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 26, 2012, 11:06:14 pm
Paniagua: 1.2-0-0-0-0-3
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 26, 2012, 11:20:07 pm
Sounds like Paniagua's velocity picked up in the second inning.  That's great to hear.  The above average slider was just as good to hear, too.  Maybe we luck up and he can be 2014/2015 guy.  Hopefully all the side work he's done being out of baseball will cause him to really surprise and the lack of game experience won't hinder him too much.

Sort of expect Underwood's review being a raw high school signee.  it's the the job of the player development people to build something out of the clay.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 26, 2012, 11:25:17 pm
I assume that 91-92 was in reference to Underwood.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 26, 2012, 11:31:39 pm
Yes, but Paniagua's pitching against kids fifteen, twenty years younger than him.

Yes, but so's Roger Clemens - some of them are probably 30 years younger.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 27, 2012, 01:27:19 am
Mesa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_26_cubrok_athrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 27, 2012, 04:32:27 am
I don't know why but I like Gretzky as a prospect...Being 6'4" and 190lbs, tall, gangly, raw and coming off shoulder surgery, he still is hitting over .300 after a slow start and only striking out 21% of the time.  Even with the sub .700 ops, I think this is a positive year for him...his ticket will be power(he has a grand total of 2 extra base hits) and for a lot of guys, that is something that takes time to develop, so to be showing any sort of hitting tool "average wise" is a positive sign.  You add in 10 homers, and this is a great season by him.  I also think their is a certain brain type that helps in being a successful athlete, and it doesn't hurt that Wayne Gretzky is his father.

Definitely a guy that needs to visit Camp Colvin this off-season.

Wasn't Lockhart suppose to be a guy that had at least a little polish?  He's hitting .220 in Mesa, so it doesn't look good for him.

It's nice to see Dunston doing so well now in Mesa after the tough start in Boise.  I wonder what is working for him or if he is doing anything different.  His k/rate is actually pretty close to the one he had in Boise(21%-19%).  It looks like if anything he's concentrating more on contact, and maybe just hitting line drives.  In boise, he actually had a 50% xbh rate(super small sample size) compared to the more usual 28.5%ish(which still seems on the higher end for skinny raw guys) you see in the low minors.  One interesting thing about him, as a lefty bat, he's actually hitting .348 against them.  He's hitting .330 in August and .342 in his last ten.  Much like Gretzky, he's definitely a guy that's seemed to be getting better and better as the seasons went on, and it's always nice to see improvement throughout the season..   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 27, 2012, 07:01:23 am
Yes, but Paniagua's pitching against kids fifteen, twenty years younger than him.

And he is a player to be named later!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 27, 2012, 09:29:06 am
Thanks for the favorable Paniagua observations.  Encouraging to get the 94-97. 

I'm often a little cautious about "showcase" and workout numbers.  Sure, Underewood hit 97 at a showcase, and there were Paniagua numbers from a tryout.  But I think guys are probably geared up/psyched up to the max and optimally rested before showcases, so they should be their max.  Being able to throw that fast after throwing semi-regularly for a few weeks (or more), and with 6 people in the seats at Mesa, different story.  (As we see with Underwood at 91-92.)  So I'd wondered whether the real Paniagua might be another 91-94 kind of guy.  The observation that he was an *easy* 92-97 is very encouraging.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 27, 2012, 09:41:07 am
Thanks for the favorable Paniagua observations.  Encouraging to get the 94-97. 

I'm often a little cautious about "showcase" and workout numbers.  Sure, Underewood hit 97 at a showcase, and there were Paniagua numbers from a tryout.  But I think guys are probably geared up/psyched up to the max and optimally rested before showcases, so they should be their max.  Being able to throw that fast after throwing semi-regularly for a few weeks (or more), and with 6 people in the seats at Mesa, different story.  (As we see with Underwood at 91-92.)  So I'd wondered whether the real Paniagua might be another 91-94 kind of guy.  The observation that he was an *easy* 92-97 is very encouraging.   

I agree...and from the folks wondering how steroids helped pitchers, you just brought it up...it'd be like they're always showcase fresh because of their healing powers.

and on the easy 92-97, I thought it was encouraging he was a couple miles faster in the second inning than the first than if it had happened in reverse, where it could have been adrenaline the first inning, losing a little as game progressed, etc.

What kind of prospect is Underwood as a 92 mph fastball pitcher?  Would he still be a plus-plus guy?  And, of course, there is always the chance he adds velocity.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 27, 2012, 11:33:18 am
Underwood was a high pick and Callis praised it, so presumably he's projectable.  It sure doesn't sound like his secondary pitches are good enough to make him an elite prospect at 91-92.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 27, 2012, 11:39:54 am
Underwood turned 18 a couple of months ago.  In a couple of years, we will have a decent idea of his abilities.  Right now, there isn't much to go on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 27, 2012, 11:55:25 am
The older I've gotten the more I've come to understand the allure of college pitchers.  Yeah, they may not have the upside of the high school guy, but you have a much better idea of their floor.  Plus, they're much more likely to reach it.  At my grand old age of 34, I've finally learned it isn't all about upside(well, haven't just learned it, but in the last few years).  Top of the first round high school pitchers are a crap shoot....anything after the tip top of the first round is a pull out your hair, "We drafted him where?", frustration-filled lottery.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 27, 2012, 12:47:42 pm
Joe Nuxhall was in the majors at 15.  Quit babying these kids, Dave.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 27, 2012, 12:55:26 pm
I was happy to see Underwood reading at 91-92.  I know he'd been reported as having touched 97 in some showcase, but these high "touchings" don't mean a lot.  I wouldn't have been surprised to have him reported at projectable 87-90.  If he's really working 91-92 at age 17/18, that's a lot of room to grow into very serious asset velocity.  So I took that as very favorable input on him, rather than as disappointing.  He's a project for sure, and you take your chances.  But it's not like there are tons of can't miss prospects, HS or college, when you're picking at 67 in the 2nd round.  I've been pleasantly surprised he's shown as well as he has. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 27, 2012, 01:20:19 pm
The Cubs get C Anthony Recker from Oakland in exchange for C Blake Lalli.  Recker will be optioned to Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 27, 2012, 01:24:54 pm
I was happy to see Underwood reading at 91-92.  I know he'd been reported as having touched 97 in some showcase, but these high "touchings" don't mean a lot.  I wouldn't have been surprised to have him reported at projectable 87-90.  If he's really working 91-92 at age 17/18, that's a lot of room to grow into very serious asset velocity.  So I took that as very favorable input on him, rather than as disappointing.  He's a project for sure, and you take your chances.  But it's not like there are tons of can't miss prospects, HS or college, when you're picking at 67 in the 2nd round.  I've been pleasantly surprised he's shown as well as he has. 

I think that is a good point and I hadn't really thought of it in those exact terms of being happy of that velocity for that reason.  If he does grow in velocity, as projectable high schoolers often do, he grows from a point that turns him into a plus-plus velocity guy instead of just a average/plus velocity guy as it would if he were starting at 87-90 on the peak end, especially as a starter.

his milb height and weight list him as 6'2" and 205 lbs.  I wonder how much of that is muscle and if some might still be a little baby fat, because that sounds like a guy that's already pretty filled out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on August 27, 2012, 01:59:09 pm
I was happy to see Underwood reading at 91-92.  I know he'd been reported as having touched 97 in some showcase, but these high "touchings" don't mean a lot.  I wouldn't have been surprised to have him reported at projectable 87-90.  If he's really working 91-92 at age 17/18, that's a lot of room to grow into very serious asset velocity.  So I took that as very favorable input on him, rather than as disappointing.  He's a project for sure, and you take your chances.  But it's not like there are tons of can't miss prospects, HS or college, when you're picking at 67 in the 2nd round.  I've been pleasantly surprised he's shown as well as he has. 
good thing he's not pitching at Boise because none of his numbers would matter
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 27, 2012, 02:16:03 pm
As much as Oneri Fleita liked making position player to pitcher conversions, it looks like he may have missed the boat on this one.

Ben Klafczynski had always been an outfielder.

It's the position he played at Kent State for four years. It's the position he played for the Cubs last year in the minors before he was released this spring.

John Massarelli, manager of the Frontier League's Lake Erie club, had seen Klafczynski roam the outfield at Kent State. Because Klafczynski is an Ohio native, Massarelli was quick to check in with him once the Cubs released him. He couldn't promise him a roster spot, but Klafczynski had enough talent to be worth a look for the Crushers outfield.

So Massarelli told Klafczynski to head to the Frontier League tryout camp, where Lake Erie would draft him. Along the way, Klafczynski mentioned he'd like to try to pitch, something he'd last done in high school.

"From scouting him at Kent, I knew he had a plus arm," Massarelli said. "I figured he'd throw 88 (mph) or so."

Massarelli said he was welcome to throw at the tryout camp. The manager would draft Klafczynski as a righthanded pitcher, with the idea of moving the 23-year-old back to the outfield during spring training.

Until, that is, Klafczynski took the mound at the tryout and started firing 94 mph fastballs.

Say goodbye to Ben Klafczynski, outfielder. Say hello to Ben Klafczynski, pitcher.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/minors/independent-audit/2012/2613957.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 27, 2012, 03:19:56 pm
The Cubs get C Anthony Recker from Oakland in exchange for C Blake Lalli.  Recker will be optioned to Iowa.
Scott Maine has been designated for assignment to make room for Recker on the 40-man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 27, 2012, 05:25:24 pm
As much as Oneri Fleita liked making position player to pitcher conversions, it looks like he may have missed the boat on this one.


Would it be a mistake to simply take EVERY position prospect and give them a few hours on the mound over a a few days to see if perhaps the athletic ability that led to their signing might actually look as if it had a better chance on the mound than in some other position?

For the vast majority it would clearly end up entirely pointless to even think about changing them.

But perhaps for one or two, like this Ben Klafczynski, it could, and for others, like a Marmol or the OF/P the Cubs got from San Diego a few years ago, it might be interesting enough to make sense to give some occassional mound work just to speed a transition if even needed, or to even make them available as emergency options if they ever make it to the majors as position players.

Would there be any harm to it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 27, 2012, 09:13:32 pm
Soler: 1-3, 2B, SB, HBP

Peralta: 6-3-2-2-2-8

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_27_wisafx_peoafx_1


Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_27_mobaax_tenaax_1



Daytona rained out!

Boise off.

DSL season over.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 27, 2012, 09:38:14 pm
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_27_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 27, 2012, 09:57:19 pm
UPDATES: There had been some concern over No. 1 draft pick Albert Almora, who seemed to twist his ankle as he hit the bag awkwardly the other day for Class A Boise. Scouting and player-development chief Jason McLeod tells me Almora is is seeing the doctor in Boise today and that the Cubs should know more later. Jason said Almora was doing better yesterday and that the Cubs hope he can play in another day or two.

On a question on our blog about Juan Paniagua, Jason said the Cubs slowly would work him into a starting role to build experience and innings. He added it's too early to determine his future role but that "he has a very good arm with makings of solid secondary stuff."

http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/7128
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 27, 2012, 11:59:08 pm
Mesa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_27_cubrok_giarok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 28, 2012, 09:29:03 pm
Wells: 2-2-0-0-1-0

Soler: 0-2, 2 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_28_wisafx_peoafx_1


Tenn:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_28_mobaax_tenaax_1


Strangely, the Daytona DH was rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 28, 2012, 09:42:38 pm
Cerda with an RBI!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 28, 2012, 09:47:10 pm
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_28_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 28, 2012, 11:59:55 pm
Amaya: 1-5, HR, 3 RBI, K

Candelario: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB, K

Almora: 0-4, K

Johnson: 2-3-1-0-1-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_28_eveasx_boiasx_1


Dunston: 0-2, K,  ( Left the inning after getting hit by a pitch. )

Maples: 1-1-2-0-1-1, WP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_28_diarok_cubrok_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 29, 2012, 12:07:30 am
Boise highlights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUmpRWJeTxM&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUmpRWJeTxM&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 29, 2012, 09:45:15 am
A few teams disclosed their AFL players Tuesday.  The rest are expected to do so today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 29, 2012, 01:35:16 pm
ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @ESPNChiCubs Silva, Rhee, Struck, Zych, Rhoderick, Rosscup to also play in fall league. #Cubs

6m ChicagoCubsOnline ‏@TheCCO
RT @ESPNChiCubs: Sczcur, Baez among 8 Cubs prospects to play in AZ Fall League. Almora, Soler not among them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2012, 01:44:38 pm
Ceasar, Baez, Silva, Rhee, Struck, Zych, Rhoderick and Rosscup.  Probably as good a group going to the AFL as they have had in several years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 29, 2012, 02:02:08 pm
Baez and Szczur are a strong Top 2 to send over.  Just honestly the rest of the group sounds like the usual bunch of relief prospects, 4th or 5th starters, etc. that we usually send over.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2012, 02:23:54 pm
Certainly, Zuch, Rhoderick and Rosscup, and perhaps even Struck and Rhee are relief prospects.  I am not sure why that is a bad thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 29, 2012, 03:40:03 pm
Zych is our future closer, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2012, 04:54:12 pm
Certainly a possibility, along with Rhoderick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2012, 05:06:03 pm
I am a little surprised that Villanueva isn't going to the AFL.  I assume he will attend the Instructional league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 29, 2012, 05:06:32 pm
Zych is our future closer, JR.

We'll see.  I guess this is from years of skepticism from following Cub prospects, but I've heard that before about a lot of Cub farm relief pitchers, though.  (Remember Marmol was starter coming through the minors.)

Zych is interesting and has some interesting peripherals, but I'm not sure his performance is making him look like a dominating future major league closer yet either.  Maybe he might, though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2012, 05:14:31 pm
I don't know if Zych will ever be a dominant closer.  Or even a dominant set up man.  For that matter, I don't know if any prospect will ever make the majors, let alone be a star.

My only point was that a pitcher that has the POTENTIAL to be a dominant closer or even a dominant set up man is not without value.

I doubt if there is any team out there that has 8 potential superstars at high value positions that they could send to the AFL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2012, 05:15:15 pm
By the way, does anyone remember who the Cubs sent to the AFL last year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 29, 2012, 05:23:07 pm
Two of the eight AFL guys will be on the taxi squad (can play only on Wednesday and Saturday).  One of them is Rhoderick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 29, 2012, 05:26:13 pm
Christian Villanueva has homered and Javier Baez has tripled for Daytona.  Must be an old box score that somehow got listed as current.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on August 29, 2012, 05:59:12 pm
Quote
My only point was that a pitcher that has the POTENTIAL to be a dominant closer or even a dominant set up man is not without value.

Oh I never said that was without value.  He's young, has a live arm and has been effective this season.  He'll probably deserve his spot in our Top 15-20 prospects or slightly higher.

But he doesn't really look like the second coming of Craig Kimbrel at this point either, though.  We've had plenty of relief prospects before who we've had closer/setup hopes like Rafael Dolis, Francis Beltran, Marcos Mateo, Jose Ceda, Esmailin Caridad, Blake Parker, Rocky Cherry, etc.  Zych isn't really unique in Cub relief prospect history yet.  We've seen this type before, so I have a hard time saying he makes our AFL class look like one of the most promising we've ever had.

(BTW yes it's definitely too early to write off Dolis as a good reliever down the road . . . he's also still worth keeping an eye on.  Just not an elite looking relief prospect right now either, though.)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2012, 07:42:47 pm
Again, has there ever been a team who sent 8 "second coming of Craig Kimbrel" prospects to the AFL?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 29, 2012, 08:50:20 pm

Baez: 1-3, 3B, RBI

Villanueva: 2-3, HR, RBI, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_29_clrafa_dbcafa_1


Baez: 1-3, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_29_clrafa_dbcafa_2


Smokies off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 29, 2012, 09:50:50 pm
Soler: 2-3, SF, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_29_cedafx_peoafx_1


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_29_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2012, 10:03:03 pm
For those wondering why Soler is not on the AFL roster

ArizonaPhil

1. A maximum of one player who was not playing in a AA or AAA league or MLB as of August 1st can be assigned to an AFL team by each MLB club, although additional players not otherwise eligible can be assigned to the Taxi Squad;

Since Baez is on the team, Soler could only be on the taxi squad and play once a week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on August 29, 2012, 10:55:41 pm
we always make a big deal of the afl every year, but is playing there really that much more beneficial compared to playing in other leagues/instructs/whatever?  Soler, Almora, etc will end up playing somewhere, and that's the main thing...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 29, 2012, 11:02:35 pm
Vogelbach: 1-3, HR, RBI, 2 BB

Almora: 2-4, 2B

Bruno: 2-3, RBI, 2 BB,   19-game hit streak


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_29_eveasx_boiasx_1


Mesa off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 29, 2012, 11:52:39 pm
we always make a big deal of the afl every year, but is playing there really that much more beneficial compared to playing in other leagues/instructs/whatever?  Soler, Almora, etc will end up playing somewhere, and that's the main thing...

Soler will be much better off in the instructional league, where he can get the intensive coaching that he needs.  The AFL is more for players who are closer to the majors.  It is more like a finishing school, while Soler needs elementary schooling.

Lordy, let's just hope that coaches don't join the NEA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 30, 2012, 12:11:14 am
Tonight's Boise highlights include the Vogelbomb.  Shoulders looks like he is a fair amount wider than Vogelbach.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyqQUPeeD_E&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyqQUPeeD_E&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 30, 2012, 12:43:00 am
Regarding Logan Watkins and possible 40-man roster inclusion this off-season, it's interesting to see how he has improved this season--his first, of course, at the AA level.

April  242-324-326

May  219-283-333

June 352-452-489

July 320-419-430

August 270-425-483

Watkins' post all-star break slash line is 302-416-476.

What jumps out at me are his iso discipline and iso power numbers for August, as he concludes the season.  He has hit a modest .270 but his OPS for August is .908.  Really nice progress.  Not sure about his defense this season but seems like he's a guy who ought to be protected from the Rule 5.

Seems like he really figured out AA after a very slow start. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on August 30, 2012, 07:36:22 am
Physically Vogelbach reminds me a good deal of Bob Horner who used to play 3B for the Braves, though quite clearly a good deal bigger.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 30, 2012, 08:45:04 am
Agree that Watkins should get protected.  He's improved from year-to-year, his BABIP is high but not outrageously fluky (.339), his K-rate is high for a singles guy but not outrageous, his HR rate has taken another small-step towards mediocre (Peoria 1 < Daytona 5 < Tennessee 7), and his BB has jumped a bunch.  .792 OPS is progress and decent for a good-speed-good-defense guy with a .381 OBP.   Just turned 23, and as a Nebraska football-team background, it's possible that the gap between his development-when-signed and his eventual level was larger than for many draftees.   

He's been a K-guy since he hit full-season, and often those guys get eaten by higher pitching, but it hasn't gotten any worse.  His K/AB has improved a tiny bit this year, and his K/PA more so.  If he can make the next step or two without it getting worse, he'll be useful, although that's not to be assumed. 

7 HR in 128 games is not a lot, but that's almost 15% of his total bases/slugging, and 15 points in batting average/OBP/OPS.  May be a career-year HR-wise, but if he could settle out as a 6-12 HR guy, that makes a difference.  95K/7HR doesn't look as problematic as his Peoria 97K/1 HR, which contributed to hitting .261. 

95K/72BB also looks a lot nicer than 97K/44BB at Daytona. 

I think he's supposed to be pretty good defensively at 2B, no?  With some SS capacity, and a little bit of CF experience?  Obviously the defense is a big factor.  A utility guy who's just naturally reliable and has a knack for being able to handle several positions, and who's perhaps very good at his best position, that's a lot different from a utility prospect like Junior Lake.  But the defense is a huge deal, and who knows how good he really is.  We hear generally favorable defensive reports about lots of prospects, but you often don't know till you really see them.  Barney got favorable defensive reports, but we didn't know he'd be this good.  If Watkins has gold-glove 2B potential, it's a different world from being just kinda good.  Barney made 19 errors at Daytona when he was 22 (and playing SS, of course).  Watkins has 9 this year.  Who knows.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 30, 2012, 09:21:43 am
Now that the AFL rosters are known:

I'm thinking about driving up to Mesa on Wednesday morning, October 24, to see the Solar Sox play Scottsdale at HoHoKam that afternoon.  I'd then stay over and see Peoria at HoHoKam on Thursday.   Would I be able to see Jorge Soler and others in the instructional league at Fitch Thursday morning?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on August 30, 2012, 09:38:58 am
Maybe that's why Jorge didn't make the team...he'd see the name Solar Sox and get a fat head thinking it was all about him.  Next thing you know there'd be a boombox and salsa music in the clubhouse!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on August 30, 2012, 10:21:41 am
I think Watkins also has some pretty big righty/lefty splits, performing much better against RHP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 30, 2012, 10:29:47 am
Video of Logan Watkins' walkoff homer Tuesday night

http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t553 (http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t553)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on August 30, 2012, 01:42:16 pm
A position player moves up a level, doesn't do very well at that level in April and May, and then from June through the rest of the season is much, much improved offensively. 

In those circumstances, for a developing prospect, I think the overall season numbers can be a bit misleading.  What's more important is what the player does over a sustained period when he adjusts to the new level of competition.

That was my point about Watkins' slash lines over the course of the season.  His overall numbers are just okay, but the June, July, August numbers seem to show a different player than what we see in the overall line.  That's a good thing.  I'm not too concerned about what he did in April and May in these circumstances.

In short, I think Watkins this season--for development purposes (the only thing that really counts)--had a much better season than the overall season numbers show.   

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 30, 2012, 04:58:02 pm
Majors are harder than minors. 
Raley's minor-league effectiveness this year was heavily built on low-walk-but-limited-HR profile.  9 HR in 131 innings.  One of the risks of "pitch-to-contract" pitching is that in order to throws tons of strikes, you choose to throw more fatter ones and more go over the wall.  But 9 HR's in 131 innings wasn't bad at all, particularly when mixed with only 40 walks. 

Majors, he's allowed 7 in 24 innings.  Heh, a HR-allowed rate increase of over 400%. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 30, 2012, 05:02:37 pm
Dan Vogelbach 2:47 interview

http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?content_id=24344281&topic_id=&sid=milb&v=3&tcid=tw_video_
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on August 30, 2012, 05:15:19 pm
Good points, reb.  He's been an .892-OPS guy 2nd half, which looks terrific.  With a 40BB/42K ratio, also terrific.  Three little self-cautions to myself:
1.  When a guy's way different over the last two months then he'd been over the previous two years and two months, it may be "development", but it may not last. 
2.  I've got a notion that a lot of hitters struggle in spring, and do better in the summer, especially in cold-weather spots but not limited to them.  So improvement may not be "development", it might be something of a seasonal deal?  (Ryne Sandberg had this every year, right?)  Maybe hitters just take a while to lock in, maybe it's that pitchers are strong and untired in the spring, beats me.   
3.  For me, personally, whenever a guy is doing better than he did before, I always tend to hope that he's "different" and "adjusted" and "figured things out".  But often it's not enduring development, it's just part of the ups and downs that come with baseball.  But whenever I see the "up", I notice and think it's maybe enduring development. 

In Watkins's case, hopefully it really is real development and will endure, and that he really has "figured it out".  Maybe the .892-OPS guy he's been second half as a 22-year-old, maybe that represents where he's at developmentally. 

But even if the seasonal numbers are less exciting, I still think they show strong development over the previous two years.  If I thought there was enough real development in-season and enough real development left that he could approach this offensive profile two leagues up, I'd be thrilled.  Obviously numbers depress against the superior big-league pitching, so he'll probably need to improve a ton to be able to do this in the NL.  But .792-OPS with .380-OBP, real speed, and good 2B-defense would be extremely valuable in the major leagues.  He'd not need to be even close to the .892-OPS second-half that he's shown to be plenty useful in the majors. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 30, 2012, 05:42:14 pm
Might he be even better than Barney?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on August 30, 2012, 06:01:33 pm
Dan Vogelbach 2:47 interview

http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?content_id=24344281&topic_id=&sid=milb&v=3&tcid=tw_video_

Thanks, Cactus.  Vogelbach seems to have his feet on the ground and to be pretty well spoken for a kid who isn't 20 years old yet.  I usually like guys who have a more athletic build, but watching video of him when he was drafted overcame that bias - he seemed to be a very, very good hitter and to run much better than one would expect - even then. I suspect he's going to become one of the top 5 prospects in the organization very soon, if he's not already.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 30, 2012, 08:12:30 pm
After the long discussion, Watkins hits another home run tonight.

And Baez hits one for Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on August 30, 2012, 08:55:37 pm
I'm working on my annual Top 20, but it's going to be extremely hard this year with so many quality pitching prospects who have only pitched a handful of innings (Maples, Paniagua, and the top pitchers from the 2012 Rule 4 draft). But Logan Watkins is among the absolute locks, and Starling Peralta is a near-lock.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 30, 2012, 08:57:15 pm
I have been working on the same thing.  I assume that there will be quite a few changes after we read ArizonaPhil's reports on the fall instructional league.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 30, 2012, 08:58:21 pm
Baez: 1-4, HR, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_30_breafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on August 30, 2012, 11:14:53 pm
Vogelbach sure has mastered his cliches.  Must have been coached by Crash Davis.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 30, 2012, 11:19:27 pm
Soler: 2-6, RBI, SB, PO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_30_cedafx_peoafx_1


McNutt: 1-0-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_30_tenaax_penaax_1


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_30_iowaaa_nasaaa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 30, 2012, 11:22:04 pm
6 Ks in 69 ABs for Soler.  He certainly doesn't seem overmatched.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 30, 2012, 11:23:16 pm
Almora: 1-4, 2B, RBI, K

Vogelbach: 1-3, BB, K

Bruno: 2-4, 2B, E,   20-GM hit-streak


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_30_eveasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 31, 2012, 12:35:35 am
Mesa clobbered in game 1 of the playoffs.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_30_cubrok_athrok_1


Paniagua: 2-1-1-0-2-1

Blackburn: 3-4-3-3-0-3
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on August 31, 2012, 08:18:10 am
Cerda is a guy to pay attention to.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 31, 2012, 09:17:03 am
The Iowa Cubs weekend series in New Orleans has been cancelled due to Hurricane Isaac.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 31, 2012, 12:22:09 pm
Sissies
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on August 31, 2012, 01:58:52 pm
Quote from: Cubs Den

If there is one reason to subscribe to ESPN Insider, it's Keith Law and his excellent, detailed scouting reports.  That's my reason, anyway.  Today his piece centers around Cubs international signee Juan Paniagua, whom he calls a "sleeper prospect".  It appears the Cubs are going to make him a starter and he does have the repertoire to pull that off, though his change up needs work.  Law said earlier that he'd heard Paniagua showed a good change in the Dominican Republic, so it's likely there's some rust there and it may not be fair to ding him for that right now.  Law also wrote about Duane Underwood but said he was less not as impressive as he had been 10 days earlier.  When I asked him he said his velocity was down a couple of ticks and he didn't show the same command.  Based on his youth and athleticism, however, Law remains optimistic the Cubs can "clean him up".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 31, 2012, 02:38:17 pm
If Sandoval can play third base for the Giants, there should be no problem with Vogelbach playing first base, left field, or any other position for the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on August 31, 2012, 03:13:54 pm
Agreed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 31, 2012, 03:27:58 pm
Sandoval is a freak, and is actually a VERY good defensive 3bman. Just because he and Vogelbach have similar body types does not mean they are similar athletes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on August 31, 2012, 03:35:49 pm
I wouldn't call Sandoval a very good defensive 3B.  On balance, he's average - as long as his weight isn't on one of it's occasional spikes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on August 31, 2012, 03:50:44 pm
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pablo-sandoval-jack-be-nimble-jack-be-quick/

I'd say that when his conditioning is on he's very good. Poor conditioning slows him for sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on August 31, 2012, 05:50:15 pm
Sandoval is a freak, and is actually a VERY good defensive 3bman. Just because he and Vogelbach have similar body types does not mean they are similar athletes.

No.  But it DOES mean that you can't rule someone out just because he has that body type.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 31, 2012, 09:33:15 pm
Baez: 0-4, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_31_breafa_dbcafa_1


Peoria rained out, Iowa cancelled.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on August 31, 2012, 10:50:05 pm
Amaya: 2-3, SB, BB, K

Candelario: 2-3, SF, 2 RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_31_eveasx_boiasx_1



Struck: 5-2/3 -1-0-0-2-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_08_31_tenaax_penaax_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on September 01, 2012, 07:53:16 am
The Angels fired the scout responsible for Trout, Trembo, Weaver, and maybe Skaggs yesterday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on September 01, 2012, 09:42:57 am
If we hire him, do we get his signees?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 01, 2012, 12:30:39 pm
Yes.  But we have to wait until they become free agents, and pay each of them 50 million per year for 25 years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on September 01, 2012, 12:38:25 pm
That deal sounds about right for Trout.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2012, 10:02:59 pm
Villanueva:  1-4, 2 SB

Loosen: 5-2-1-1-1-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_01_breafa_dbcafa_1


Peoria:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_01_peoafx_kccafx_1


Iowa cancelled.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2012, 10:09:50 pm

Szczur: 2-5, 2B

Watkins: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, 2 BB, SB

Rhoderick: 1/3 -1-1-1-2-1   (Post all-star break: 31 IP, 35 H, 32 BB)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_01_tenaax_penaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 01, 2012, 10:54:33 pm
That gets Watkins up/over the .800-OPS mark.  He's hit as many HR's over the last month (5) as he had all last season, and more (by 1) than he'd hit over the first four months of this season.  His 4 HR's this week make up more than a quarter of his career total. 

Buckner commented about how after guys hit HR's, they often go into a dive.  Did that happen somewhat to Vitters, I wonder?  Watkins will need to be careful, I suppose. But hopefully it reflects some genuine adjustment.  Maybe when a kid is weak in short-season ball, he develops a non-lift stroke, because lifting will just get it to the outfielders, not over the wall?  Perhaps he's added the strength over the years so that he doesn't have to? 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 01, 2012, 11:57:55 pm
Boise concludes its regular season by coming back from an 11-5 deficit.

.

Bruno: 1-1, RBI, BB, HBP, ejected  -  NWL batting champ (.361) & OPS leader (.937ish)


Amaya: 2-4, 2B, 3B, 2 RBI, 2 BB, K


Vogelbach: 3-5, 2B, 3 RBI, BB, E


Almora: 2-5, RBI


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_01_eveasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 02, 2012, 02:11:09 am
From Cubs Den

1B Dan Vogelbach went 3 for 5 with 3 RBI and also drew a vital walk in the bottom of the 9th.  Vogelbach is hitting. 322 with 10 HRs at Boise and .323 with 17 HRs overall this season.  In this particular game, I was impressed that Vogelbach easily scored from 3rd on a short fly ball in foul territory.  The big man is faster than he looks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on September 02, 2012, 08:01:59 am
How is Bruno the OPS champ? Vogelbach is higher than him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 02, 2012, 08:29:58 am
How is Bruno the OPS champ? Vogelbach is higher than him.

Vogelbach probably did not have enough AB to qualify.  252 for Bruno; 143 for Vogelbach.  When you look at the league leader-board http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=l_bat&lid=126 you find that the player who is listed there with the fewest AB still has 16 more than Vogelbach.

While the numbers are great for Bruno, Bruno is two years older than Vogelbach, but if Bruno was fielding SS well, those hitting numbers had to have pleased the Theocracy.  .361/.442/.496/.938.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 02, 2012, 08:45:20 am
Almora ends the Boise season with a .292 OBP and a .738 OPS.  He'll be an interesting challenge for the development process.  Plenty of time and talent and maturation left for improvements in both IsoD and IsoP.   

But in the long Cub tradition of walk-a-phobic prospects, a guy going to a new league and going 65 AB with an IsoD of 0.000 is funny.  Even if he's never going to take a walk, you'd think some random HBP might get him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on September 02, 2012, 09:27:39 am
Was Candelerio injured at the end of the season? He didn't play that final game. He is also really, really young. Won't turn 19 until November -- in fact, he is only about 5 months older than Almora (and is a full-year younger than guys like Vogelbach, Amaya and Hernandez). He only had a so-so season, but still has really interesting offensive upside.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 02, 2012, 11:58:29 am
Was Candelerio injured at the end of the season? He didn't play that final game. He is also really, really young. Won't turn 19 until November -- in fact, he is only about 5 months older than Almora (and is a full-year younger than guys like Vogelbach, Amaya and Hernandez). He only had a so-so season, but still has really interesting offensive upside.

Candelario isn't injured. He's been hitting well lately. Bruno alternates between 2B, SS and 3B, so Jeimer got a day off before the playoffs start. Considering his youth, his season was well above "so-so."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 02, 2012, 12:03:06 pm
Candelario had a great start to the season, and then went into a rather prolonged slump, especially a slump in power.  In the past month or so, he has come back strongly, not only for average, but finally showing a little power once again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 02, 2012, 12:16:41 pm
How is Bruno the OPS champ? Vogelbach is higher than him.

Vogelbach didn't have enough plate appearances to qualify for the leaderboard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 02, 2012, 12:21:43 pm
Plus, he is too fat to fit on the leader board.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 02, 2012, 06:41:50 pm
Daytona is tied 2-2 with Brevard County.  Both Cubs runs were homers by Javier Baez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 02, 2012, 06:53:53 pm
Solo shots.

Obviously not a clutch performer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 02, 2012, 06:57:06 pm

Watkins: 2-6, 2B, SF, 2 RBI

Szczur: 1-6, BB, 3 K

Zych: 2/3 -3-2-2-2-0

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_02_tenaax_penaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 02, 2012, 06:59:25 pm
Baez: 2-3, 2 HR, 2 RBI, IBB, K

Torreyes: 2-3, 2B, BB


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_02_breafa_dbcafa_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 02, 2012, 08:38:46 pm
Peralta has given up his share of runs lately.  But he's had a lot of K's.  His last 6 starts, not totally consistent, but taking his best 4, he's had 38K/24.1 inning.
8K/5.1IP
8K/6IP
4K/5IP
8K/6IP
2K/6IP
14K/7IP
I agree with Jeff that he seems like a guy you'd want to protect this winter. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 02, 2012, 09:13:32 pm
Video of Soler's long home run tonight:


http://yfrog.com/ndpdhretqoatlwbafilvnbirz
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on September 02, 2012, 09:25:35 pm
I wonder what kind of prospect we have in Bruno? Peoria next year or maybe even up to AA?

Also, I feel we need to hang on to AJ Morris...he has quietly had a solid year, coming off injury. if i recall correctly, wasn't he a semi prized prospect before the arm troubles?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 02, 2012, 09:43:02 pm
Bruno is rather old for his league, and was not a particularly high draft choice.  I won't get excited about him until he starts doing extremely well at Daytona. 

Tim Saunders is similar in many respects.  It is best to reserve judgement until they get to high A.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 02, 2012, 09:56:44 pm
Soler: 3-5, HR, RBI

Peralta: 5-1/3 -3-3-3-3-8    ( 56-2/3 IP, 42 H, 28 BB, 62 K's  last 10 starts )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_02_peoafx_kccafx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 02, 2012, 10:39:18 pm
Nice to see our top 2 prospects have a big night.  Soler really has a beautiful swing - short, quick with great lower-body leverage.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on September 02, 2012, 10:56:00 pm
Soler really has a beautiful swing - short, quick with great lower-body leverage.

I like everything I've seen from Soler.  He seems like the real deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 03, 2012, 12:15:43 am
A different video of Jorge Soler's homer

http://www.telly.com/NB8XB?fromtwitvid=1 (http://www.telly.com/NB8XB?fromtwitvid=1)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 03, 2012, 04:00:47 am
Quote
Though he entered the game with a .169 batting average in his 23-game Daytona stint, Baez practically golfed the first homer out of the park. He crushed a down-and-away curveball over the batting cage beyond left field in the fifth inning.

Two innings later, Baez redirected a fastball over the center-field fence -- an estimated 420 feet.

"That was the farthest one I hit this year," said a smiling Baez, who hit 15 home runs in 290 at-bats between low Class-A Peoria and Daytona.



Quote
Peoria play-by-play announcer Nathan Baliva called Soler’s HR the longest by any Chief this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 03, 2012, 04:03:23 am
Quote
Wilken, who was promoted to his new position earlier this month, was at O’Brien Field for the only time this season. Previously he was involved primarily in amateur scouting, but he said his new role will have him dealing with the major leagues in addition to seeing 50 to 75 amateur players a year.

After a conversation with him, it’s best to just clean out the notebook:

On the defensive play of Baez: “The thing I really enjoyed — I was telling (Cubs baseball operations president Theo Epstein) this — is he’s a very calm fielder. It’s not hard for him, but he plays very, very under control. That’s a hell of an attribute for a 19-year-old playing shortstop: that he plays under control. It takes a while for shortstops to play under control, and he’s got that quality.”

On his first draft with Epstein, general manager Jed Hoyer and vice president of scouting and player development Jason McLeod: “It was a fun draft, probably the most fun one I’ve been associated with. It was different, bringing all the views together, the different sides of the coin. We’ve got the graybeards and then the creative guys. I think we went together as a really good mix.”


http://www.pjstar.com/sports/x1803411290/Capie-What-was-and-might-have-been
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on September 03, 2012, 09:48:40 am
Grey beards and creatives, that's an interesting way to describe old school scouts and stat heads, and it sounds like a pretty positive take on their relationship.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 03, 2012, 09:51:18 am
Junior Lake's three run homer in the top of the fifteenth

http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t553 (http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t553)

Let it run and older highlights appear
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 03, 2012, 09:56:35 am
Dan Vogelbach's double from Saturday

http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t480 (http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t480)


He doesn't look all that slow for a guy his size.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 03, 2012, 10:47:26 am
I was thinking yesterday about how Vogelbach physically resembled for Phillie All-Star Greg Luzinski, and after the comment about Vogelbach not looking "all that slow for a guy his size," I decided to check Luzinski's stat record.

While baseball-reference.com listed him as 6'1" and 220, that seems to be a very charitable memory of his weight.  wikipedia lists him as 6'1" and 255... about the same as Vogelbach.

And, like Vogelbach, he was a firstbaseman in the minors (all but 5 games at 3B in his first year in low A at 17... and he made 6 errors in those 5 games).  Luzinski played 471 games at 1B in 4 minor league seasons.  And when he came up to the majors, he played 31 games at 1B his first two seasons, and then 1221 games in the OF, all but one game in LF, with only 4 more games at 1B in the rest of his career.

Four time All-Star, and four times in the top 10 in MVP voting, twice finishing 2nd.

I see no reason to think Vogelbach could not play LF as well as Luzinski.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 03, 2012, 11:47:23 am
Vogelbach really gets sold short by a lot of people who can't see past body type.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Eastcoastfan on September 03, 2012, 03:36:10 pm
I think he should develop a quick staccato home run trot so that he looks like Babe Ruth in news reel footage.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 03, 2012, 03:51:21 pm
He doesn't even need to do that.  All that is necessary is to only film him using 1930s technology.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 03, 2012, 05:02:04 pm
Finales for Tenn & Peoria,

*

Soler: 1-2, BB, HBP, CS, Assist

Wells: 2-3-0-0-3-1, HB, 2 WP


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_03_peoafx_kccafx_1



Szczur: 1-4, BB, K

McNutt: 1-1-0-0-0-1

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_03_tenaax_penaax_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 03, 2012, 08:09:42 pm
Can't help but think Wells is going to end up with tj surgery...no k's last time had me lil worried after averaging 8k/9 earlier, and now the dreaded wildness with 3 bb's and 1 k in 2 innings...small sample size still but worrying to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 03, 2012, 08:15:26 pm
Or it might just be rust from the long layoff. We'll find out next spring.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 03, 2012, 08:16:38 pm
Is there some kind of advantage for either side for him delaying having the surgery, since he's required to go on the 40 man in 2013?

For him, if he's on the 60 day DL all season, I presume that means he gets the major league minimum salary, and for us, we wouldn't have to burn an option year on him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 03, 2012, 09:09:42 pm
Is Wells eligible for the draft this December?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on September 03, 2012, 09:22:44 pm
Chris- Many thanks for all the minor league box scores, articles, videos, and all else.  Board MVP again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 03, 2012, 09:24:08 pm
Chris- Many thanks for all the minor league box scores, articles, videos, and all else.  Board MVP again.

I fully agree. Thanks again, Chris.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 03, 2012, 09:25:07 pm
Is Wells eligible for the draft this December?
No.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 03, 2012, 09:26:49 pm
Is Wells eligible for the draft this December?

No. He was drafted out of high school in the seventh round of the 2010 draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on September 03, 2012, 09:27:40 pm
Thanks much, Chris!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 03, 2012, 09:32:30 pm
While I'm not privy to the medical facts regarding Ben Wells, I'm willing to assume that the doctors, the Cubs and Ben Wells all thought it was worthwhile to treat his elbow with rest and recovery, rather than TJ surgery. There's no guarantee that was the right choice, of course.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 03, 2012, 10:10:18 pm
It is premature to thank Chris for posting the box scores.  he still has a couple more Boise scores to post.

Make sure that he doesn't screw those up before you thank him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 03, 2012, 10:54:35 pm
Boise plays great for a month and then lays an egg in game one. Now they must win the next two.


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_03_yakasx_boiasx_1



Johnson: 3-2-1-0-1-2

Almora: 1-4, SB
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 04, 2012, 08:10:28 am
No. He was drafted out of high school in the seventh round of the 2010 draft.

He's not eligible for the Rule 5, but Hendry put a provision in Wells' contract which requires us to put him on the 40 man for 2013.

http://www.bryantdaily.com/post/Bryants-Wells-signs-contract-with-Cubs.aspx
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 04, 2012, 09:47:26 am
Boise Hawks designated hitter Rock Shoulders celebrates with a bat boy and the teammates he knocked in with a grand slam — Marco Hernandez, Daniel Vogelbach and Jeimer Candelario — during the fourth inning against the Yakima Bears on Monday at Memorial Stadium.

(http://media.idahostatesman.com/smedia/2012/09/04/00/17/q3pTu.AuSt.36.jpeg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 04, 2012, 11:06:50 am
He's not eligible for the Rule 5, but Hendry put a provision in Wells' contract which requires us to put him on the 40 man for 2013.

http://www.bryantdaily.com/post/Bryants-Wells-signs-contract-with-Cubs.aspx

Ouch! I wasn't aware of this. I hope the reporter mis-spoke, and that all he was promised was an invitation to Spring Training next year. We already have roster spots committed for Soler and Concepcion.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 04, 2012, 11:51:32 am
He's not eligible for the Rule 5, but Hendry put a provision in Wells' contract which requires us to put him on the 40 man for 2013.

http://www.bryantdaily.com/post/Bryants-Wells-signs-contract-with-Cubs.aspx

I'm not sure why this is such a big deal.  Wells was a difficult sign, and most believed that he was going to college (which is why he went in the round 30s.  It is likely that if the offer had not been made, he would not have signed with the Cubs.  But nothing is lost.  If he isn't worth a 40 man slot, they can release him.  In the meantime they have had control of him for several years to see if he is worth it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 04, 2012, 04:29:07 pm
Dave, Wells was selected in the seventh round.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 04, 2012, 05:05:58 pm
Principal Park in Des Moines

(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-IzjbnKLzXLI/UDpIHCc1ljI/AAAAAAAAR6Q/UqL4VpwYEzU/s1024/IMG_5784.JPG)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 04, 2012, 06:42:21 pm
Rock Shoulders' third grand slam of the year Monday night.  Full screen works well.

http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t480 (http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t480)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 04, 2012, 07:01:48 pm
I stand corrected.  I thought he was far down the line.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 04, 2012, 07:03:37 pm
I was thinking of McNutt.  Is it my fault that Hendry gave the spot to the wrong guy?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 05, 2012, 12:38:40 am
The Hawks' season was nearing an end tonight before a 2-out triple from Almora and subsequent wild pitch tied the game in the 8th. Then Boise exploded for 7 runs in the 9th, thanks in part to a 2-run triple from Candelario and 2-run double from Almora.

Rubber game tomorrow.


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_04_boiasx_yakasx_1


Amaya: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, BB

Bruno: 3-5, 2B, RBI, Assist, E

Candelario: 2-4, 3B, 2 RBI, BB, K, E

Almora: 3-5, 2B, 3B, 2 RBI
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 05, 2012, 10:01:38 pm
Boise puts 3 on the board in the 3rd. Vogelbach's 2-out, 2-run single the biggest blow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 05, 2012, 11:27:54 pm
Amaya temporarily saves the Hawks' season in the 8th.


Quote
Boise Hawks Radio ‏@BoiseHawksRadio

.@BoiseHawks 3, Yakima 2 ( End 8 ) - Amaya makes defensive play of the year to preserve the lead...diving stop behind second...


Boise Hawks Radio ‏@BoiseHawksRadio

throws out runner from his knees with runner at 3rd...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 05, 2012, 11:53:35 pm
Boise holds on and advances to the championship series.


Amaya: 1-2, SB, 2 BB, K, E

Almora: 1-3, SB, BB (1st in Boise), K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_05_boiasx_yakasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on September 05, 2012, 11:56:09 pm
Boise wins, 3-2! 

Eduardo Orozco slams the door on Yakima in the 8th (with 2 runs in, only one out and a guy on 3rd) and also in the 9th to save it!   He's been really good this season!

Almora with a hit and the in the 9th a walk (then, a steal)...he's been really good for such a young guy, too!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 06, 2012, 12:12:07 am
Attendance in Yakima the last two nights - 695 and 398.

No wonder they're moving to Hillsboro, Oregon in 2013.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 06, 2012, 12:17:35 am
Chris, that was actually Almora's second SB in the playoff series tonight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 06, 2012, 12:36:24 am
Cubsin, I meant that was his first walk as a Boise Hawk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 06, 2012, 01:44:59 am
Cubsin, I meant that was his first walk as a Boise Hawk.

Chris, he also had a stolen base in game one of the playoff series. Oops, now I see you said "first walk."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 06, 2012, 11:46:12 am
Chicago Cubs Sign Canadian Undrafted Free Agent Jesse Hodges

http://www.bleachernation.com/2012/09/06/chicago-cubs-sign-canadian-undrafted-free-agent-jesse-hodges/ (http://www.bleachernation.com/2012/09/06/chicago-cubs-sign-canadian-undrafted-free-agent-jesse-hodges/)

Included in the Bleacher Nation piece is a link to another story on Hodges.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 06, 2012, 02:17:20 pm
Cubs Prospect Notes: Soler, Almora, Vogelbach, Paniagua, Candelario, Watkins

This is pretty much a compilation of stuff already published but there are some interesting comments

Quote
Ben Badler has been answering questions from numerous people on Twitter regarding Cubs prospects.  Badler responded that Jeimer Candelario was more impressive to him than Gioskar Amaya and that Candelario was "impressive for skipping a level" and should develop plenty of pop.  I like both players and while Candelario may end up being the better hitter, Amaya may have the clearer path to the majors.  Even if Candelario can stay at 3B, he may find Javier Baez entrenched there.  However, Baez may be athletic enough to play 2B, so it may come down to which of the the two Boise products forces their way into the lineup.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/cubs-prospect-notes-soler-almora-vogelbach-paniagua-candelario-watkins/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/cubs-prospect-notes-soler-almora-vogelbach-paniagua-candelario-watkins/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on September 06, 2012, 02:34:44 pm
http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2012/09/06/an-interview-with-jim-callis-of-baseball-america/

Callis talking about the Cubs system.  Top 5- Baez, Almora, Soler, Vizcaino, Villaneuva
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 06, 2012, 03:28:55 pm
No way Almora is ahead of Soler.

Paniagua is a hugely, hugely important prospect for us.  If he's for real he could be a major mover in 2013, maybe even knocking on the door of a late-season callup.  He's certainly not being blocked by anybody.  If he flames out, an already bleak situation looks even more desperate. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 06, 2012, 03:51:48 pm
Surprises me to see Almora ahead of Soler as well, but it also makes me wonder if i'm selling Almora short....not that I didn't think he was a premium prospect.  I just thought Soler had a higher ceiling.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on September 06, 2012, 04:07:22 pm
What's great is that we have 3 guys who are clearly "elite" prospects in Baez, Soler and Almora...and only Baez was in the system a year ago (and with far less certainty as to the type of player he could become).

Vizcaino and Paniaga will be real interesting to watch early on in 2013...both potential top-of-rotation guys.

The farm has been getting more interesting - and better - on a very regular basis since Theo took over!

We just need to remain patient...the organization IS getting better!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on September 06, 2012, 04:09:04 pm
No way Almora is ahead of Soler.

Paniagua is a hugely, hugely important prospect for us.  If he's for real he could be a major mover in 2013, maybe even knocking on the door of a late-season callup.  He's certainly not being blocked by anybody.  If he flames out, an already bleak situation looks even more desperate. 

That's how I see it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 06, 2012, 04:41:24 pm
Almora already is, and will continue to be a much better fielder than Soler, and is much more polished that Soler, who is extremely raw in almost every area.  Certainly, if Soler develops in every single area possible, with his substantial power, he will be a better major leaguer than Almora.  But until he has shown that he WILL develop, it is hard to rate him as the very best prospect in the Cubs system.

We will have a much better feel for it after next season, when each of them start to see actual breaking balls from pitchers who can command them.

The same situation exists with Paniagua.  Until we see him against GOOD live batters, we don't know if he has the command to get the ball past him.  He really didn't play live baseball until the end of this season, when he was facing guys much younger than himself.  When he does well in Daytona (whenever that may be) we can breath a sigh of relief.

I am not downplaying the value of any either of them.  I am very glad we have them in the system.  But although both Soler and Paniagua have great potential, they also have great question marks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 06, 2012, 05:08:52 pm
I don't know how "raw in every area" Soler could be when he excelled in full-season ball, striking out less than 10% of the time, drawing walks, stealing bases efficiently and drawing universal praise for his defense while Almora was performing acceptably in short-season ball. If that's raw, I'd hate to see Soler cooked.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 06, 2012, 05:37:25 pm
http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2012/09/06/an-interview-with-jim-callis-of-baseball-america/

Callis talking about the Cubs system.  Top 5- Baez, Almora, Soler, Vizcaino, Villaneuva

2 of the top 5 prospects were obtained in July trades.  It would be nice if Villanueva could earn a Sept call up next year.  His K percentage jumped through roof after the trade, however, so I wonder if the Cubs changed his approach in any way or what exactly happened.  It was almost 29% at Daytona after never being much over 22% at any other level.  Definitely makes Sept call up next year look unlikely, though it probably still is even with a great year in AA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 06, 2012, 05:53:29 pm
Villanueva as the #5 prospect is either a massive stretch, or an indication that the system is still pretty awful - you pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 06, 2012, 05:57:45 pm
I don't know how "raw in every area" Soler could be when he excelled in full-season ball, striking out less than 10% of the time, drawing walks, stealing bases efficiently and drawing universal praise for his defense while Almora was performing acceptably in short-season ball. If that's raw, I'd hate to see Soler cooked.

That is good enough for me.  The scouts are obviously wrong.  Stats are an excellent way to determine how well a player is founded in the fundamentals of baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 06, 2012, 06:12:44 pm
I doubt that Callis feels Soler's ceiling is lower than Almora's. But there's also little doubt that Almora's floor is much higher. Almora should be somewhere between Doug Glanville and Joe DiMaggio. Soler could be anywhere between Brian Dopirak and Hank Aaron. (FWIW, I ranked Soler second and Almora 3rd.)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 06, 2012, 06:40:56 pm
MLB.com's top 100 prospects list is out

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-net-five-in-MLBcoms-Top-100-prospec?blockID=769079&feedID=10336&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed (http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-net-five-in-MLBcoms-Top-100-prospec?blockID=769079&feedID=10336&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed)

Quote
Baez (No. 24) and Jackson (74) are still on the list and they're joined by Albert Almora (52), Arodys Vizcaino (76) and Jorge Soler (77).

Cubs top twenty:

1. Baez
2. Almora
3. Jackson
4. Vizcaino
5. Soler
6. Matt Szczur
7. Trey McNutt
8. Junior Lake
9. Pierce Johnson
10. Josh Vitters
11. Dillon Maples
12. Robert Whitenack
13. Dan Vogelbach
14. Ben Wells
15. Paul Blackburn
16. Jeimer Candelario
17. Gioskar Amaya
18. Tony Zych
19. Alberto Cabrera
20. Marcus Hatley


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on September 06, 2012, 06:53:23 pm
Wow, Jackson is still on the list?  And ahead of Soler? 

Interesting that Villanueva is top 5 for Callis, but not even top 20 for Mayo. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 06, 2012, 06:55:07 pm
It's utterly preposterous to suggest that a kid two months out of HS has a "floor" of Doug Glanville.  His floor is he could be a bust, just like every other high school draft pick.

It's also self-evident that a player who was "raw in every area" couldn't dominate full-season A-ball, showing no statistical weaknesses, despite having less than a month of professional baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 06, 2012, 07:36:11 pm
From an article by Dave Kaplin

In listening to a number of major league scouts who have evaluated Soler, it becomes obvious that he has tremendous athleticism and an extremely bright future but also that he is a very raw prospect who a lot to learn before he can call Wrigley Field home.

“Soler is a 20-year-old kid. He is not a 20-year-old mature guy, he is a 20-year-old kid,”  said Peoria Chiefs hitting coach Barbaro Garbey, who is spending time working with Soler on a daily basis. “He has the power, he has the talent and he has the time because he is only 20 years old. Like him, I came from Cuba and it takes time to make adjustments especially when you don’t speak English and he doesn’t yet understand how hard you have to play every single day."

Obviously, Kaplin doesn't have access to the stats that Deeg cites.  And what could Garbey possiblly know?  Yeah, he works with him and sees him every day, but he probably never looks at the stats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 06, 2012, 08:06:55 pm
Perhaps, his performance in the minor's this year being as raw as he is shows what an exceptional talent he truly is...rather a raw(scouting) versus not raw(stats) debate
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 06, 2012, 08:13:17 pm
Wow! Marcus Hatley made the top 20 and Christian Villanueva didn't? I demand a recount. Hatley is Rule 5 eligible this winter, and I haven't heard a single fan clamoring that he deserves a roster spot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on September 06, 2012, 08:14:13 pm
or maybe the performance demonstrates pretty clearly that the "raw" stuff is overstated. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 06, 2012, 08:32:01 pm
That is probably it.  It is much easier to tell if a prospect is raw by looking at the stats, rather than merely watching how he performs in games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on September 06, 2012, 08:33:26 pm
Sigh.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 06, 2012, 08:36:38 pm
I don't know how "raw in every area" Soler could be when he excelled in full-season ball, striking out less than 10% of the time, drawing walks, stealing bases efficiently and drawing universal praise for his defense while Almora was performing acceptably in short-season ball. If that's raw, I'd hate to see Soler cooked.

Soler had 149 PA in 2012.

Almora had 145.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 06, 2012, 08:39:09 pm
You have to understand, Jes, that professional baseball people and reporters just don't have access to the stats the way we fans do.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 06, 2012, 08:43:27 pm
MLB.com's top 100 prospects list is out

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-net-five-in-MLBcoms-Top-100-prospec?blockID=769079&feedID=10336&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed (http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-net-five-in-MLBcoms-Top-100-prospec?blockID=769079&feedID=10336&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed)

Cubs top twenty:

1. Baez
2. Almora
3. Jackson
4. Vizcaino
5. Soler
6. Matt Szczur
7. Trey McNutt
8. Junior Lake
9. Pierce Johnson
10. Josh Vitters
11. Dillon Maples
12. Robert Whitenack
13. Dan Vogelbach
14. Ben Wells
15. Paul Blackburn
16. Jeimer Candelario
17. Gioskar Amaya
18. Tony Zych
19. Alberto Cabrera
20. Marcus Hatley


Vogelbach at 13th?

Bull.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 06, 2012, 09:46:05 pm
....It would be nice if Villanueva could earn a Sept call up next year.  His K percentage jumped through roof after the trade, however, so I wonder if the Cubs changed his approach in any way or what exactly happened.  It was almost 29% at Daytona after never being much over 22% at any other level. .....

That's my guess. 
Villanueva was a low-walk guy who struck out a lot.  24BB/375AB, 24BB/83K.  Now he's 10BB/24K/84AB. 

Yes, the K-rate has gone up, but less than the walk rate.  The K/BB was 3.5, now it's 2.4.  Pretty rare to increase walk rate without increasing K-rate.   

When a guy whiffs 22% even when he's swinging early and avoiding 2-strike counts, it's no surprise that he's going to whiff more if he starts taking more pitches and putting himself into more deep or 2-strike counts.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 06, 2012, 10:02:18 pm
Trey McNutt #7?  This guy obviously hasn't been paying much attention to the farm system lately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 06, 2012, 10:32:20 pm
Yes, the second-hand reportings of a second-rate reporter should certainly trump the factual evidence.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 06, 2012, 11:24:22 pm
What is the basis of his evaluation?  I am not aware that the post above gave that information.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 07, 2012, 01:09:31 am
The Hawks absolutely imploded tonight blowing a 7-1 lead in losing game one.


Hernandez: 3-5, 2 RBI, E

Amaya: 0-4, BB, 4 K, E

Vogelbach: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, 2 K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_06_boiasx_vanasx_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 07, 2012, 09:46:22 am
Hawks’ collapse leads to Canadians win

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/09/07/2261635/hawks-collapse-leads-to-canadians.html (http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/09/07/2261635/hawks-collapse-leads-to-canadians.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 07, 2012, 03:12:14 pm
Video on Soler talking about his rawness and potential along with listing 5 cubs in ba's top 100.

Javier Baez (24), Albert Almora (52), Brett Jackson (74), Arodys Vizcaino (76) and Jorge Soler (77)...think that might have already been posted


http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/david-kaplan-on-cubs-prospect-jorge-soler/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 08, 2012, 05:32:18 pm
The Cubs have dismissed six members of the Minor League coaching staff. Dave Bialas, who has been with the Cubs for 18 years, most recently as Triple-A Iowa’s manager, was on the list along with Class A Daytona pitching coach Marty Mason, Class A Peoria manager Casey Kopitzke and hitting coach Barbaro Garbey, and Mesa Rookie League pitching coach Frank Castillo and hitting coach Jason Dubois. Kopitzke, Castillo and Dubois all played for the Cubs.

– Carrie Muskat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on September 08, 2012, 05:35:47 pm
Off to the gulags
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 08, 2012, 05:42:07 pm
Who was the coach/manager that said he hadn't seen any changes and the new cub's philosophy, etc was all talk? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 08, 2012, 05:42:49 pm
I expect more firings to come. I've had a long term beef about our player development (or lack thereof). Getting rid of Fleita's buddies and replacing them with the best managers and coaches available is at least as important as drafting well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on September 08, 2012, 05:46:15 pm
He's on that there list, Ray.  :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 08, 2012, 06:18:52 pm
I'm surprised Garbey was let go.  He was supposedly some sort of half-assed mentor for Soler.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 08, 2012, 06:35:12 pm
As a Cuban defector himself, he probably was able to relate with Soler, Concepcion, Silva, etc better than some others.  But it sounds like they didn't much care for his coaching skills.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 08, 2012, 06:44:14 pm
We have any other Cuban guys in the org that can serve in that capacity?  As many Cuban guys as we've compiled, it would be nice if we had someone who they could relate to, share experiences, etc.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 08, 2012, 07:06:10 pm
I'm not aware of any.  But except for the Instructional league and spring training, most farm teams don't have more than one or two at a time anyway.  Still, it would be nice if they could bring in a Cuban with good coaching skills.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 08, 2012, 07:11:36 pm
Maybe Silva can function in that role.  We know he can't play baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 08, 2012, 07:12:16 pm
Too bad the Cubs weren't bought by Mark Cuban.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on September 08, 2012, 07:14:02 pm
I just picture Joe West and Angel Hernandez umpiring with Mark Cuban in the owner's box.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 08, 2012, 07:30:33 pm
I'm probably overrating the importance of having some sort of Cuban mentor(great Seinfeld episode) anyway.  I'd just like to see everything done that can be done to make sure those guys are as successful as possible...Soler especially 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 08, 2012, 07:55:22 pm
I expect more firings to come. I've had a long term beef about our player development (or lack thereof). Getting rid of Fleita's buddies and replacing them with the best managers and coaches available is at least as important as drafting well.

I wonder if Ryno will return....   :-)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 08, 2012, 07:58:20 pm
I'm probably overrating the importance of having some sort of Cuban mentor(great Seinfeld episode) anyway.  I'd just like to see everything done that can be done to make sure those guys are as successful as possible...Soler especially

It appears the Theocracy actually have the strange idea that the best way to make sure those guys are successful is to actually have good coaches for them.

Strange idea.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 08, 2012, 08:51:23 pm
It appears the Theocracy actually have the strange idea that the best way to make sure those guys are successful is to actually have good coaches for them.

Strange idea.

I have no problem with Theocracy getting the best coaches available and encourage it.  Not sure where I came across as being against it.  Unless there is some sort of cap on coaches/support personnel you can have in the org, I don't see where it would be detrimental to have a Cuban guy in there to help them adjust and learn.  Of course, I can't guarantee it would be beneficial either I suppose.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 08, 2012, 09:59:46 pm
I expect more firings to come. I've had a long term beef about our player development (or lack thereof). Getting rid of Fleita's buddies and replacing them with the best managers and coaches available is at least as important as drafting well.

Dave Bialas
Marty Mason,
Casey Kopitzke
Barbaro Garbey,
Frank Castillo
Jason Dubois.

I don't think many of these are long-term Fleita guys.  Dubois and Castillo, I think they were maybe 1st-year coaches?  At most second.  Kopitzke hasn't been around for long.  Mason hasn't been in the system for very long, I don't think. 

Bialas seems the only real long-term guy. 

So I'm guessing that if there has been some long-term bad-development situation, I doubt some rookie coaches like Dubois and Castillo were responsible. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on September 08, 2012, 10:28:16 pm
I'd fire that Garbey guy just for talking to Dave Kaplan.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 08, 2012, 10:56:19 pm
The Hawks do it again. Tie it in the 7th, tie it again in the 8th, and then win it in the 9th.

.


Johnson: 3-3-1-0-0-6, 2 WP

Arias: 4-2/3 -3-1-1-0-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_08_vanasx_boiasx_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on September 08, 2012, 11:11:43 pm
Iowa- Mike Mason 5 years, Dave Keller 8 years
Tenn- Buddy Bailey 6 years, Jeff Fassero 3 years, Mariano Duncan 2 years
Daytona- Brain Harper 2 years, Desi Wilson 5 years
Peoria- Tom Pratt 13 years
Boise- Mark Johnson 2 years, David Rosario 8 years, Bill Buckner 1 year
Mesa- Bobby Mitchell 1 year, Mark Tronerud 17 years (rehab pitching coach)
DSL- Juan Cabreja 9 years, Anderson Taveras 6 years, Ricardo Medina 13 years, Leo Perez 4 years, Leo Hernandez 17 years, Yudith Ozorio 2 years?, Franklin Blanco 6 years, Robert Jimenez 12 years.

Other than the DSL there aren't many long term guys left as coaches.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 09, 2012, 12:31:13 am
Boise highlights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r48mTXFtjcM&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r48mTXFtjcM&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 09, 2012, 01:16:13 am
Almora was holding his chest after that collision with the wall. I can't imagine him playing in tomorrow's deciding game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 09, 2012, 06:25:18 am
I have no problem with Theocracy getting the best coaches available and encourage it.  Not sure where I came across as being against it.  Unless there is some sort of cap on coaches/support personnel you can have in the org, I don't see where it would be detrimental to have a Cuban guy in there to help them adjust and learn.  Of course, I can't guarantee it would be beneficial either I suppose.


There was really no attempt to suggest that it would be detrimental to have a Cuban guy around to help them adjust and learn, or to suggest that I thought you were opposed to having the best coaches available.  The comment was merely to point out that the Theocracy apparently believes that without regard to whatever value those released might have provided in 2012, they simply are not good enough coaches to merit having them around in 2013, and that the Theocracy may believe that not only will other prospects benefit more from better coaches, but that Solar and the other Cuban prospect also will.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Coach on September 09, 2012, 07:50:34 am
The Cubs have dismissed six members of the Minor League coaching staff. Dave Bialas, who has been with the Cubs for 18 years, most recently as Triple-A Iowa’s manager, was on the list along with Class A Daytona pitching coach Marty Mason, Class A Peoria manager Casey Kopitzke and hitting coach Barbaro Garbey, and Mesa Rookie League pitching coach Frank Castillo and hitting coach Jason Dubois. Kopitzke, Castillo and Dubois all played for the Cubs.

– Carrie Muskat

On the bright side, I understand Theo had a wonderful time at his nephew's tvilah.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on September 09, 2012, 07:54:09 am
Does this mean we lose Frank Castillo's wife AGAIN?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 09, 2012, 01:29:02 pm
They offered her a personal services contract, but she declined.  Said she was too old for that kind of work.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 09, 2012, 03:25:37 pm
wow, projectable left handed pitching could be a strength at the top of the 2013 draft.  Maybe a guy will be there deserving of the second round pick.  Hate to take a high school arm at number 2 over all unless he is truly elite.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/early-draft-preview/2013/2613888.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 09, 2012, 03:35:28 pm
And for all those writing off Vitters, don't forget Rizzo's 2011 season with San Diego.  .141 ba with 1hr and 46 k's in 128 ab's.

Not saying Vitter's will figure it out, but I would like to see how he adjusts in AAA next year and if he can improve himself as a hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 09, 2012, 03:45:51 pm
And for all those writing off Vitters, don't forget Rizzo's 2011 season with San Diego.  .141 ba with 1hr and 46 k's in 128 ab's.

Not saying Vitter's will figure it out, but I would like to see how he adjusts in AAA next year and if he can improve himself as a hitter.

While an interesting comparison, Rizzo's OPS last year in San Diego was about twice what Vitters' is this year in Chicago, and Vitters is a year older than Rizzo was.

Rizzo last year also had an OPS of 1.056 last year in AAA, and this year Vitters had a AAA OPS of .869... and Vitters was still a year older in the minors this year than Rizzo was in the minors last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 09, 2012, 03:52:52 pm
While an interesting comparison, Rizzo's OPS last year in San Diego was about twice what Vitters' is this year in Chicago, and Vitters is a year older than Rizzo was.

Rizzo last year also had an OPS of 1.056 last year in AAA, and this year Vitters had a AAA OPS of .869... and Vitters was still a year older in the minors this year than Rizzo was in the minors last year.

yep.  Everything you wrote is correct.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 09, 2012, 07:15:20 pm
Here's another view of Wilson Contreras' game winning RBI single Saturday night.  It's pretty clear the audio was added later.  Listen to Mike Stafford get very excited just before the pitch is thrown.

http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t480 (http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?sid=t480)

Followed by older highlights.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 09, 2012, 08:17:33 pm
Boise fell behind 2 runs in the 1st tonight, but a 3-run Vogelbomb capped a 4-run bottom half.

Also good news in that Almora is playing after it was reported he wouldn't.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 09, 2012, 08:19:25 pm
Quote
BoiseHawksRadio : The homer by Vogelbach nearly hit the batters eye in CF...at least 430 feet...a true Vogel-bomb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 09, 2012, 09:05:28 pm
And now the Hawks are losing as Taylor Scott struggles.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 09, 2012, 09:28:49 pm
The Hawks just keep responding. RBI hits from Amaya, Vogelbach and Candelario give them the lead back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 09, 2012, 10:39:52 pm
Boise's pen blows it again. They now trail in the 8th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 09, 2012, 11:33:26 pm
Sadly, Boise's pitching was wretched and they lost 12-9.  On the plus side, Paniagua got into the game and fanned both hitters he faced, giving him a final line for the season of 4.1-0-0-1-6 between Mesa and Boise.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 09, 2012, 11:43:00 pm
Wasn't just Boise's pitching. 5th error for Candelario and 4th from Amaya in just 6 playoff games contributed as well.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=g_box&gid=2012_09_09_vanasx_boiasx_1


Vogelbach: 2-4, HR, 4 RBI, HBP

Almora: 1-4, BB, Assist, E

Bruno: 2-4, 2B, RBI, BB
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 10, 2012, 12:03:33 am
The sad highlights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8U1ETHzJ3c&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8U1ETHzJ3c&list=UUXpj-Svl8vUeuEp8lVmjYZw&index=1&feature=plcp)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 10, 2012, 12:06:43 am
Nice blown call by the 1st base ump to end the season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 10, 2012, 07:12:21 am
About all that was missing from Boise's 8th inning was Bartman.

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/09/10/2265595/a-rotten-case-of-deja-vu-costs.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 11, 2012, 03:42:50 am
A piece on Bill Buckner's impact on the Hawks and his desire to return to Boise which will depend on the Hawks returning.


http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/09/11/2266853/impactful-buckner-hopes-to-return.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 12, 2012, 11:31:36 am
CubsDen

"Sahadev Sharma wrote an excellent piece on Jorge Soler and why he's not going to winter ball.  As I've speculated in the past, it has more to do with with Soler not ready for that level of competition and the Cubs preference for him to go to instructs and work on basic fundamentals. "

I wonder why he has to work on his fundamentals?  He certainly isn't raw.  His strike out rates indicate that his fundamentals are fine. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 12, 2012, 11:52:21 am
Thanks, Jes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 12, 2012, 11:57:35 am
Thanks, Jes.

Watch out, davep.

Point out Deeg's foolish positions too often and he'll put you in ignore.

And I tell you from bitter experience, having Deeg ignore your posts is a torment you simply do not want to experience.

Live becomes.... so empty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 12, 2012, 01:55:43 pm
To play go-between here:  We know there are a lot of parts to baseball, so Soler may well need all kinds of work on many of them.  How to flip his shades on a sunny day, how to step on the inside corner of 2B when going 1st-to-3rd, how to warm up his arm before games, how to set up on a fly ball so as to make the throw to 3rd or home with as much power/momentum but as little time as is needed, etc..  Lots of "finesse" fundamentals. 

But the most important fundamental is the ability to hit the ball.  As opposed to doing things that get you off-balance etc so that you don't hit it. 

I think deeg is correct that Soler's stat-line *can* tell us something about his fundamental ability to hit the ball.  A guy who is K'ing so little, there would seem to be something fundamentally correct in his brain and in his vision and in his balance/stroke. 

I'd much rather have a guy with fundamentally sound hitting who is otherwise raw and needs to polish his defense/throwing/baserunning fundamentals, than a guy who has fundamental problems hitting. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 12, 2012, 02:02:12 pm
I'd much rather have a guy with fundamentally sound hitting who is otherwise raw and needs to polish his defense/throwing/baserunning fundamentals, than a guy who has fundamental problems hitting. 


So would I.  But Deeg's original position was that Soler couldn't be raw because his strikeout rate was low.  At no time did I say that Soler was not a good, even great prospect, and when the conversation started when Soler was ranked behind Almora because Soler was "raw", I mentioned in my first post that I ranked Soler ahead of Almora.  That doesn't change the fact that Soler is raw in a great many areas.  He, like Castro, has enough talent to do well in many areas in spite of his rawness.

Deeg would do well to put me on ignore is he is unable to stand it when someone points out errors in his logic.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 12, 2012, 02:11:45 pm
Cubs to stay in Boise two more years

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/09/12/2268706/cubs-hawks-renew-affiliation-agreement.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on September 12, 2012, 03:32:31 pm
Most of the Cubs starting today wouldn't make the Boise roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 12, 2012, 03:37:55 pm
Deeg would do well to put me on ignore is he is unable to stand it when someone points out errors in his logic.

It is already established that Deeg has problems with that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on September 12, 2012, 05:27:22 pm
So would I.  But Deeg's original position was that Soler couldn't be raw because his strikeout rate was low.  At no time did I say that Soler was not a good, even great prospect, and when the conversation started when Soler was ranked behind Almora because Soler was "raw", I mentioned in my first post that I ranked Soler ahead of Almora.  That doesn't change the fact that Soler is raw in a great many areas.  He, like Castro, has enough talent to do well in many areas in spite of his rawness.

Deeg would do well to put me on ignore is he is unable to stand it when someone points out errors in his logic.

Well, you're good at the straw man part of logic, that's for sure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 13, 2012, 10:08:35 am
Chicago Cubs Sign Canadian Undrafted Free Agent Jesse Hodges

http://www.bleachernation.com/2012/09/06/chicago-cubs-sign-canadian-undrafted-free-agent-jesse-hodges/ (http://www.bleachernation.com/2012/09/06/chicago-cubs-sign-canadian-undrafted-free-agent-jesse-hodges/)

Included in the Bleacher Nation piece is a link to another story on Hodges.

Cactus thanks for posting this a while back.  When I first saw it, I just thought at first it was some undrafted college roster fill guy, but I just noticed in the BA transactions that he was actually an undrafted high school player we noticed while scouting the World Junior Tournament in South Korea.

He probably didn't get a signing bonus high enough to count against our draft or international budgets or else someone would have mentioned it.  Still, since he's a high schooler, there's probably a decent chance he got the standard $100K bonus.  Hopefully he turns out to be a guy worth keeping an eye on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 13, 2012, 10:42:33 am
Remind me:  What was the international bonus allotment, and how much got spent on Paniagua (sp?) and the 2B guy we signed first day?  Was there still half a million left or so?  Or pretty much only minimum-wage guys signable after those two? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 13, 2012, 11:28:39 am
International Pool for signings on or after 7/2/12 - $2.2 million spent out of $2.9 million available

RHP Juan Carlos Paniagua, Dominican Republic - age 22 - $1.5 million bonus
SS Frandy De La Rosa, Dominican Republic - age 16 - $700,000 bonus
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 13, 2012, 12:05:16 pm
I can't imagine that the Cubs would only sign those two players. Paniagua has already reached the U.S., and they need replacements for all the DSL players they promote to the U.S. or release. There are wrinkles to the rules, such as unlimited signings for $10,000 or less, only the top five signed (either over or under) $50,000 count against the cap, and the same additional 5% above the cap without penalty as under the Rule 4 Draft. They've probably signed a dozen or more kids, but just haven't announced their names.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 13, 2012, 01:01:02 pm
There are all sorts of new names in the Dominican league this year.  I believe they only announce the fairly large dollar signings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on September 13, 2012, 01:12:56 pm
I can't imagine that the Cubs would only sign those two players. Paniagua has already reached the U.S., and they need replacements for all the DSL players they promote to the U.S. or release. There are wrinkles to the rules, such as unlimited signings for $10,000 or less, only the top five signed (either over or under) $50,000 count against the cap, and the same additional 5% above the cap without penalty as under the Rule 4 Draft. They've probably signed a dozen or more kids, but just haven't announced their names.

What does that mean by only the top 5 signed for (either over or under 50,000) count against the cap?  Either I'm understanding that wrong, or it sounds like a loophole.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 13, 2012, 01:38:04 pm
I was too lazy to look through the CBA. I'm not sure if the over-50K signings are included or not, but after you sign five players for 50K, any additional signings up to 50K don't count against the cap. Likewise, all signings for $10k or less don't count against the cap.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 13, 2012, 01:43:19 pm
The Cubs have two DSL teams, which means about 50 healthy players and perhaps 10 more on the DL. In an average year, I'd expect half a dozen or so promotions to the U.S., and perhaps 18 or so players released. So the Cubs need to sign about 24 IFA's each year to stock their DSL teams. Or perhaps it's even more.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 13, 2012, 02:12:32 pm
I read a report back in July that indicated that the Cubs had signed many more overseas prospects this year than they had in past seasons, and were considering fielding a third DSL team next year.  Their strategy seems to be to sign one or two high priced prospects, and then fill in with a lot of guys for Castro-level money, hoping some will develop.

Looking through the DSL records, it looks like the two teams had a total of 44 pitchers and 34 position players between the two teams this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 13, 2012, 02:23:20 pm
Fielding additional minor league teams?

I love it.

I wonder where I heard that suggested before?

Friedman was the guy I hoped Ricketts would hire instead of Theo, but I am very, very happy with what we have seen from the Theocracy, and Ricketts, so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 13, 2012, 02:44:55 pm
The Cubs will certainly continue to sign players for the DSL rosters.  I was just curious what the "minimum wage" was for roster-fillers:  $10K or $50K or what?  And whatever that minimum-wage threshold was, I'm curious how much discretionary money beyond those was still available after DelaRosa and Paniagua. 

Thanks, Jeff, $700 K left isn't a bunch of studs, but everybody is under the same budget constraints.  So it may be that several $200-250K guys are pretty meaningful, and might have cost $500 K or more 12 months ago. 

I recall seeing the rules once, in nice detail, but I can't remember where exactly.  But I recall thinking that it wasn't quite as restrictive as I'd originally expected in terms of volumes and prices for 5-figure guys. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on September 13, 2012, 06:41:31 pm
I believe the Cubs also signed a couple of others guys for around $50-100,000.  It is in the NSBB international thread.

Here's the post from davell

I asked Jesse Sanchez a couple days if we had signed anyone else and we gave 100k to a kid named Wagner Dislan and 80k to a kid named Luis Hernandez. Both are from the DR but I don't have what positions either plays.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 13, 2012, 07:52:51 pm
"Wagner Dislan" and Cubs produces nothing on google.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on September 13, 2012, 08:50:36 pm
The Cubs haven't announced the signings.  It came from a reporter that works for MLB network.  No clue on what position they play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 14, 2012, 12:27:26 pm
Bruce Miles ‏@BruceMiles2112
Theo said #Cubs Class A Boise team "had a prospect at every position" by the end of the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 14, 2012, 12:44:24 pm
I assume "outfield" is one position and not three.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 14, 2012, 12:47:02 pm
That's pretty much true.
C:  Wilson Contreras
1B:  Vogelbach
2B:  Amaya
SS:  Hernandez
3B:  Candelario
Utility:  Bruno
Lf:  ??
CF:  Almora
RF/CF:  Trey Martin

The only spot without a prospect was left field, right?  And even there, Shoulders played there a tiny bit, and Bruno, right? 

Heh, probably Theo was subliminally projecting Vogelbach for LF.  :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 14, 2012, 01:16:15 pm
I believe Bruno played left a little bit.  At least the talk on CubsDen was that he COULD play there.

They also cycled through some decent prospects, such as Baez and Soler.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 14, 2012, 01:18:41 pm
Dave, neither Baez nor Soler played at Boise this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 14, 2012, 01:19:47 pm
Well, they should have.  They KNEW I was going to make that post.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 14, 2012, 01:27:29 pm
That's what you get when you deal with raw talent.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 14, 2012, 01:45:39 pm
Quote from: Carrie Muskat
Albert Almora, the Cubs’ first round pick in June, took part in batting practice on Friday. The 18-year-old outfielder from Hialeah, Fla., hit a couple balls into the left field bleachers.

“This has been one of the best days of my life,” Almora said. “This is awesome.”

When he signed, he did take a tour of Wrigley Field and checked out the view from center. But this time, he was in uniform surrounded by big league players.

“I was in center field, and I don’t know how much history has been on this field, but I feel very blessed and very thankful,” he said.

He will go to Mesa, Ariz., on Monday to begin instructional league.


(https://api.plixi.com/api/tpapi.svc/imagefromurl?size=medium&url=http%3A%2F%2Flockerz.com%2Fs%2F244299558)
(https://yfrog.com/mmypyqcj:iphone)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 16, 2012, 02:18:43 am
Very short translated interview with Jorge Soler from Wrigley Sunday:

http://www.wgntv.com/videogallery/72319626/Sports/Video-Prospect-Soler-at-Wrigley-Field
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 16, 2012, 05:29:39 am
Quote
Soler, 20, who signed a nine-year, $30 million contract with the Cubs this summer, put on quite a show during batting practice -- hitting five home runs, including two over the left-field bleachers and onto Waveland Avenue.

"What a great athletic body," Cubs manager Dale Sveum said of Soler, who had seen before only on video. "Great hands -- the ball comes off his bat to the pull side pretty nice without a lot of effort. That's something to build on when you have those kind of hands and that kind of hand speed, you can always work with that."


http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120914&content_id=38440124&notebook_id=38465174&vkey=notebook_chc&c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 16, 2012, 05:43:30 am
I wonder whether either Almora or Soler would have gotten a Wrigley Field batting practice "call up" in September this year if not for the fact that the team on the field is so poor this season.

I'm not really critical of it, but it seems that the reason was far less to lest Sveum take a look at either of the (he will likely see both in spring training), or to give Soler or Almora a taste of the majors, since they are under team control and it is not as if the Cubs need to persuae either of them to sign with the Cubs, but instead to let the media and the fans see that there is something on the horizon, even if the team this season (and next season) is pretty bleak.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 16, 2012, 07:36:50 am
Usually top picks always go to Wrigley sometime around the time that they sign.  The surprise with Soler/Almora isn't that they came, it's that they came now instead of back two months ago when they were signed. 

I expect management wanted them to get going to Mesa and use as much of the remaining summer as they could.  Kids who signed earlier, back in June, I think all came (Johnson, Blackburn, Underwood).  In past guys who signed well into August, there was too little season left to make any real difference, so Baez and Vogelbach I think both came last year. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 16, 2012, 09:37:43 am
craig, while if I am wrong it won't even be the first time so far this morning, but I think those such as Baez and Vogelbach came right before they signed, and one last move to persuade them to sign, or that if it came right after it was because that was promised in the negotiations.

This seems much more a matter to trying to convince the faithful that there is still a reason for faith after what may still end up a 100 loss season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 16, 2012, 12:09:53 pm
I don't remember any coming to Wrigley before they signed, although it certainly is possible that it happened.  Most first round choices such as Vitters and Montenez came shortly after they were signed, but I have no idea if it was a condition of their signing.  It has been going on for decades at least.

I don't remember if any came in September, but if not, it seems to me to be another good idea by Epstein or whoever.  Regardless of whether the team is doing well or badly, it is a good idea to remind the fans what is going on in the minor league system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 16, 2012, 12:27:43 pm
Regardless of whether the team is doing well or badly, it is a good idea to remind the fans what is going on in the minor league system.

I am not saying it is a good idea, or a bad idea.

I am simply suggesting that the hope is to persuade fans to keep buying tickets and supporting the team during a period when the team on the field stinks.

Hard to know what would happen in very different circumstances, but I would be interested in knowing if Theo did this in September with Boston teams which were in the thick of a pennant race.  I am guessing he did not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 17, 2012, 11:44:03 am
9/16 Instructional league

The Cubs’ instructional league begins on Monday, and it’s another chance for some of the team’s top prospects to fine tune their skills. Games begin on Sept. 21. Here’s a list of players who will participate at the Cubs’ facility in Mesa, Ariz.:

Pitchers

Jose Arias, Dallas Beeler, Paul Blackburn, Gerardo Concepcion, Nathan Dorris, Corbin Hoffner, Pierce Johnson, Trey Lang, Dillon Maples, Chad Martin, Carlos Martinez, Ryan McNeil, Juan Paniagua, Stephen Perakslis, Starling Peralta, Anthony Prieto, Austin Reed, Duane Underwood, Ben Wells.

Catchers

Wilson Contreras, Chadd Krist, Rafael Lopez, Justin Marra, Lance Rymel.

Infielders

Arismendy Alcantara, Gioskar Amaya, David Bote, Stephen Bruno, Jeimer Candelario, Ben Carhart, Marco Hernandez, Jesse Hodges, Carlos Penalver, Jacob Rogers, Tim Saunders, Dan Vogelbach.

Outfielders

Albert Almora, Yasiel Balaguert, Shawon Dunston Jr., Trevor Gretzky, Trey Martin, Bijan Rademacher, Jorge Soler.

– Carrie Muskat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 17, 2012, 11:51:21 am
There are a lot fewer roster-fills this year than there has been in the past.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 17, 2012, 12:58:03 pm
There is not a single Dominican-Leaguer on that list.  And not even guys like Penalver (sp?) and Jeff Baez who finished with Mesa.  (Paniagua, who finished with Boise, is on the list, of course.)   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on September 17, 2012, 01:27:53 pm
Carlos Penalver is on there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 17, 2012, 01:42:04 pm
Are the Instructional League games played at Fitch Park? What time of day?  I'm going to have a free morning in Mesa in early October.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 17, 2012, 01:54:17 pm
Carlos Penalver is on there.

You're right!  It's only Jeffrey Baez missing.  Still, last fall Penalver and Baez and a couple of the 2011 Latin signings were there.  This year, no 2012 Latin signings other than Paniagua, Soler, and Concepcion.  And not many from then. 

May reflect visa issues; may reflect that they just don't have anybody else really compelling from the DSL teams this year; more likely it simply reflects that they are now so happy with their Dominican academy and instructional program that the young Latins are often better served there than here.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 17, 2012, 01:57:16 pm
It may be that they believe the Dominican Academy can give them as good or better coaching at this point.  Also, as I remember, they have added players as the fall went on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 17, 2012, 04:37:11 pm
John Arguello of Cubs Den offers his thoughts on the pitchers going to the Instructional League

One he likes
Quote
Juan Paniagua, 22, RHP - The Cubs biggest non-Cuban international signing this year, Paniagua has a smooth, effortless delivery that generates heat up to 96-97 mph to go with a power slider.  The change is rusty and I imagine he'll be working on that quite a bit down in instructs.  Along with Johnson, he may start as high as Daytona if he shows progress this fall.

And one he doesn't like as much
Quote
Gerardo Concepcion, 20, RHP-  A lost season as he didn't show the velocity or command expected and then contracted mono to end his season early.  It's hard to consider him a top prospect right now despite the $6M bonus but he'll get a chance to show this past season was an aberration.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/instructional-league-presents-big-opportunity-for-top-cubs-pitching-prospects/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/instructional-league-presents-big-opportunity-for-top-cubs-pitching-prospects/)

The rest of the roster tomorrow
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 17, 2012, 05:50:28 pm
Concepcion is, of course, a LHP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 17, 2012, 05:55:50 pm
He's a LH something anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 17, 2012, 07:21:17 pm
Perhaps the confusion about which hand he throws with is the crux of the problem.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 17, 2012, 10:42:58 pm
It is possible that Brett Jackson will not get 130 at bats, and will still be considered a rookie next year.  If so, where should he fit in the Cubs top 20 list?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 17, 2012, 11:53:49 pm
It is possible that Brett Jackson will not get 130 at bats, and will still be considered a rookie next year.  If so, where should he fit in the Cubs top 20 list?

Fifth, behind Baez, Soler, Almora and Vizcaino on my list. But he already had 99 at bats before tonight's game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 18, 2012, 01:21:51 pm
Quote
Yesterday we talked about the pitchers, today it's the position players.  Because it's a large group, I'll start with the outfielders and then move on to catchers and infielders in a separate piece.

One player noticeably absent from the list is Reggie Golden, who was certainly a prospect going into the year but had yet another devastating injury.  The fact that he's not here tells me he's still not 100%.  I would think the Cubs would try to make up as much as possible for his lost time had he been able to go.

If there's a theme with this group, it's unlocking some of the power potential that all these players have. Whether it's more extra base hits, the 20 HR potential of Albert Almora, or the light tower power of Jorge Soler, it seems like all of these players will be looking to turn it up a notch for next season.

(http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/files/2012/09/soler-peoria-close-624x463.jpg)

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/outfielders-at-instructs-will-try-and-tap-into-power-potential/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/outfielders-at-instructs-will-try-and-tap-into-power-potential/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on September 18, 2012, 03:17:53 pm
Didn't Golden tear an ACL, I would be surprised if he was ready to go this soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 19, 2012, 08:01:41 am
It's official - the Cubs Low-A affiliate will be somewhere other than Peoria next season.

http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120918&content_id=38612194&vkey=pr_t443&fext=.jsp&sid=t443
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 19, 2012, 02:12:09 pm
The Cubs have officially agreed with Kane County on a PDC.   They have also renewed with Daytona and Boise.


Contracts run through 2014.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 21, 2012, 10:13:03 am
Quote from: John Arguello - Cubs Den
I thought with the end of the minor league year, the instructional league starting, the fall league coming soon, and some fans already thinking about the 2013 draft, it might be a good time to field some questions on those particular subjects.

Send me your questions either here or directly to my e-mail and I will get to them by tomorrow.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/minor-league-and-mlb-draft-mailbag/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/minor-league-and-mlb-draft-mailbag/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 22, 2012, 01:35:27 am
AzPhil's first Instructional League recap:

http://www.thecubreporter.com/09212012/cubs-turn-dbacks-away-fitch-park


Alcantara returned to action.

Jose Arias very effective. Paniagua also pitched.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 22, 2012, 11:41:41 am
John Arguello answers questions on the top prospects and the 2013 draft

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/minor-league-mailbag-part-1/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 23, 2012, 03:47:08 am
Instructional was ugly Saturday particularly for Dillon Maples:

http://www.thecubreporter.com/09232012/diamondbacks-let-bats-do-their-talking-stick
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 23, 2012, 10:36:10 am
ArizonaPhil

3B Jesse Hodges made his professional game debut, going 1-2 with a fly out to the warning track to the deepest part of the field (about 415 feet from home plate) in right-center in his first at bat, before lacing a line-drive RBI single to knock-in the Cubs first run of the game in the 5th. The 18-year old Hodges was signed by the Cubs a couple of weeks ago, after starring for the Canadian Junior National Team last month at the World Junior Tournament in South Korea.

Although he was eligible for selection in this past June's MLB First-Year Player Draft, Hodges could be signed after the mid-July deadline because he was not drafted, he had used up his high school ("secondary school" in Canada) eligibility, and he was not currently enrolled in a college. (Hodges had signed an NLI with Grayson JC in Texas, but had not yet enrolled).

The Cubs have signed many more Canadian prospects in the past couple of years than I remember in the past.  I wonder if they have a new scout up there?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 23, 2012, 11:38:22 am
John Arguello on the Instructional League catchers and infielders

For DaveP

Quote
Jesse Hodges, 18, 3B: An undrafted free agent, Hodges is already a big kid at 6'2", 215 lbs. and though played SS when they signed him, he has no chance to stick there.  I haven't seen much of Hodges other than video and from what little I've seen, he shows some discipline at the plate and seems to have a short compact swing that can generate some power.  He did go undrafted, however, so until he proves himself against better competition, I'll reserve judgment.  Signed late, he needs to catch up.

and

Quote
Dan Vogelbach, 19, 1B:  What's there left to say that we haven't said already?  Vogelbach surprisingly stayed in extended spring training but he took the instruction and the "Cubs Way" to heart, vastly improving his discipline, pitch recognition, and the ability to hit the ball the other way.  The raw power was never questioned, but converting that to usable power can be tricky, as the Cubs have learned the hard way with draft busts like Ryan Harvey and Earl Cunningham.  Vogelbach seems to have made that leap successfully, hitting 17 HRs, 21 2Bs, and 3 3Bs in 283 PAs between AZ and Boise.  The only question now is whether he can play good enough defense to stick at 1B.  If he does and he continues to pummel the baseball, the Cubs will have some decisions to make when he reaches the upper levels.

and the rest

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/instructional-league-catchers-and-infielders/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/instructional-league-catchers-and-infielders/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 24, 2012, 08:30:50 am
The Rule 5 draft is December 6 in Nashville, Tennessee.  Reserve lists must be filed by November 20.

Rule 5 Draft eligible players in the Cubs' system

Jeffry Antigua, LHP
Frank Batista, RHP
Justin Bour, 1B
Michael Brenly, C
Michael Burgess, OF
David Cales, RHP
Esmailin Caridad, RHP
Matt Cerda, INF
Hunter Cervenka, LHP
Evan Crawford, OF
Willengton Cruz, LHP
Antonio Encarnacion, RHP
Eduardo Figueroa, RHP
Marcus Hatley, RHP
Ty'Relle Harris, RHP
Jay Jackson, RHP
Alvido Jimenez, RHP
Austin Kirk, LHP
Luis Liria, RHP
Jeff Lorick, LHP
David Macias, IF-OF
Nate Maldonado, C
Trey McNutt, RHP
Pedro Medina, RHP
Jose Montesino, INF
A.J. Morris, RHP
Enyelberth Pena, RHP
Felix Pena, RHP
Starling Peralta, RHP
Nelson Perez, OF
Dae-Eun Rhee, RHP
Rebel Ridling, 1B
Greg Rohan, IF-OF
Melvin Rosa, RHP
Jose Rosario, RHP
Zac Rosscup, LHP
Julio Sanchez, RHP
Brian Schlitter, RHP
Ryan Searle, RHP
Matt Spencer, LHP
Nick Struck, RHP
Larry Suarez, RHP
Francisco Turbi, RHP
Christian Villanueva, 3B
Brett Wallach, RHP
Logan Watkins, INF
Casey Weathers, RHP
Rob Whitenack, RHP
Ty Wright, OF
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 24, 2012, 08:44:29 am
For your consideration:

Kirk, McNutt, Morris, Peralta, Rhee, Rosario, Rosscup, Struck, Villanueva, Watkins, Whitenack.

Also, Kyler Burke will be a six-year minor league free agent if not added to the roster shortly after the end of the World Series.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 24, 2012, 09:51:42 am
Cubs Minor League Mailbag: Part 2

Quote
Javier Baez has the highest ceiling of any position player in the minors.  One scout I talked to rated him as a 70 both as a hitter for average and for power.  Then consider that you can put that bat at SS and you have an elite player.  Even at 3B you have yourself a potential .300 hitter with 30 HR power, good baserunning skills, and a potential for gold glove caliber defense.

The pitcher with the highest ceiling is Duane Underwood.  On his good days, he sits at 91-94 and peaks at 97 and throws a slower, big-breaking curve, and a solid change for a guy his age.  Very coachable and very athletic -- and he has plenty of time to improve as a someone who is just 18 years old. He's a guy who has a chance to get a whole lot better.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/cubs-minor-league-mailbag-part-2/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/cubs-minor-league-mailbag-part-2/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 24, 2012, 11:21:48 am
For your consideration:

Kirk, McNutt, Morris, Peralta, Rhee, Rosario, Rosscup, Struck, Villanueva, Watkins, Whitenack.

Also, Kyler Burke will be a six-year minor league free agent if not added to the roster shortly after the end of the World Series.

Even on that list, there aren't a whole lot of guys there that most teams will want to burn a 25 man spot all year in order to acquire. 

Kirk, McNutt, Morris, Rhee, Rosscup, and Struck are definitely in the future relief/#5 starter category if things go well for them.  Whitenack certainly didn't show enough last year to have a team go through the trouble of rostering him for an entire season next year.  Even with those guys, if we lose one, it's pretty far from the end of the world.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 24, 2012, 01:53:15 pm
Baseball America's Top 20 for the Arizona Rookie League is out. Almora was ranked #2, Soler #4 and Vogelbach #14. I'm not a subscriber, so i can't post their scouting reports.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 24, 2012, 02:50:51 pm
Vogelbach's gonna have to put up Ruthian numbers before people take him seriously.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 24, 2012, 03:13:50 pm
Vogelbach's gonna have to put up Ruthian numbers before people take him seriously.

Against the all-time career leaders, Vogelbach would currently rank behind the career leaders (Ruth, Ted Williams, Gehrig and Barry Bonds) and ahead of the other four with career OPS's above 1.000 (Foxx, Pujols, Greenberg and Hornsby). People will take him seriously if he can stay ahead of Hornsby through AA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 24, 2012, 04:07:56 pm
Against the all-time career leaders, Vogelbach would currently rank behind the career leaders (Ruth, Ted Williams, Gehrig and Barry Bonds) and ahead of the other four with career OPS's above 1.000 (Foxx, Pujols, Greenberg and Hornsby). People will take him seriously if he can stay ahead of Hornsby through AA.

When you adjust for age Vogelbach would need one heck of a performance in AA in 2013 to stay ahead of Hornsby.  At age 20 (and Vogelback turns 20 in December), Hornsby had an OPS+ of 150 in 138 games in the NL.  I wonder what sort of AA numbers Vogelbach would need next year to have a major league equivalency (wasn't that the name of the crazy stat?) of a 150 OPS+....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on September 24, 2012, 05:24:25 pm
BA:

02.    Albert Almora, OF, AZL Cubs
Age: 18  B-T: R-R  Ht.: 6-1 Wt.: 170  Drafted: Mater Academy, Hialeah Gardens, Fla., 2012 (1st round).
Like Russell, Almora is a Florida high school product who went in the first round in June, signing for $3.9 million as the No. 6 overall pick. His reputation as an extreme hard worker was evident from the first day he arrived at the Cubs complex in Arizona, as he required frequent reminders from the staff to pace himself in the extreme summer heat. He drew raves for his off-the-charts makeup.

"He's humble, he's willing to learn and listen," Cubs manager Bobby Mitchell said. "You don't always get that on players picked that high."

Almora has the tools to match his outstanding character. With his loose swing and solid speed, he projects to hit for a high average, and he has the bat speed and raw power to hit 20 homers annually once he gets stronger. The stands out in center field with his tremendous instincts, jumps and routes, and he also has an above-average arm that combines strength and accuracy.

4.    Jorge Soler, OF, AZL Cubs
Age: 20  B-T: R-R  Ht.: 6-3 Wt.: 205  Signed: Cuba, 2012.
One of the most coveted players to defect from Cuba in recent years, Soler signed a nine-year, $30 milllion contract with the Cubs two days before the July 2 international signing period began. He hadn't played in organized games in nearly a year and the rust showed during his time in Arizona, but his talent was evident and he hit better following a promotion to low Class A.

Soler has a lean, athletic body and should get stronger. He'll need to curb a tendency to overswing, but he has above-average raw power and the ball makes a different sound when it comes off his bat. He has slightly above-average speed from home to first and is better underway, and he's an instinctive baserunner who stole eight bases in as many tries in the AZL.

Soler has the biggest room to improve on defense, especially with his routes and angles on balls. He has average arm strength for right field and makes accurate throws.

14.    Dan Vogelbach, 1B, AZL Cubs
Age: 19  B-T: L-R  Ht.: 6-0 Wt.: 250  Drafted: Bishop Verot HS, Fort Myers, Fla., 2011 (2nd round).
Vogelach played briefly in the AZL after signing for $1.6 million as a second-round pick in 2011. He returned to post a 1.078 OPS in the first month of this season before moving up to short-season Boise, where he was equally productive. There aren't many big leaguers with 6-foot, 250-pound builds and his value is tied mostly to his bat, but it has the potential to be a very special bat.

Vogelbach combines raw strength, quick hands and good knowledge of the strike zone. He has a tremendous feel for hitting and plus power to all fields. He's a well below-average runner and most scouts question whether he'll ever be good enough to play a major league-caliber first base, though he does work hard on his defense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 25, 2012, 01:56:25 am
Soler with a homer and a walk in Instructs Monday.

http://www.thecubreporter.com/09242012/cubs-way-path-victory-indian-school-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on September 25, 2012, 11:14:03 am
The Cub Reporter noted that the AZ Cubs "...have drawn 20 walks in their 1st three instructs games (20 walks used to be a couple of week's worth)."

Seems like EVERYONE in the organization has gotten the memo!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on September 25, 2012, 11:34:19 am
Noticed in a sidebar to above link that Aramis Ramirez leads NL in extra base hits.  Having a terrific season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 25, 2012, 01:06:58 pm
Aramis has 50 doubles and 98 RBI. Since the break he's hitting .331 with a .990 OPS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 25, 2012, 02:28:47 pm
If we had re-signed him, we would be in last place less than we are now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on September 25, 2012, 02:29:02 pm
Not to second guess, because Aram seemed to have burned bridges with the Cubs (or they with him), but he continues to be a great third baseman.  Hard to compare eras, but I rank him higher than Santo.

Let the flames begin. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 25, 2012, 02:29:37 pm
If we had re-signed him, we would be where we are now, but less.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 25, 2012, 02:30:45 pm
Ramirez is a better hitter than Santo.  But he is nowhere near Santo defensively.

Overall, I would pick Santo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on September 25, 2012, 02:31:51 pm
I still don't think it would've been a good idea to give him the 3 years he needed to sign, though.  He seems like a guy who could just crash and burn at any time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 25, 2012, 02:38:00 pm
Santo's career OPS+ is higher than Ramirez's.

Ron Santo's achievements as an offensive player are underappreciated by many.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 25, 2012, 02:39:02 pm
If Santo were Ramirez age, I wouldn't have signed him last year either, unless it were to trade him last July.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on September 25, 2012, 02:55:15 pm
ARAM has been a very good player...Santo was great!  He hit a ton and had that fabulous glove!

Santo...clearly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on September 25, 2012, 04:19:58 pm
Santo's career OPS+ is higher than Ramirez's.

Ron Santo's achievements as an offensive player are underappreciated by many.

Not even close between Santo and Ramirez offensively. 

About the same difference as Paul Konerko OPS+ career compared to Adam LaRoche career OPS+.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on September 25, 2012, 05:21:30 pm
Noticed in a sidebar to above link that Aramis Ramirez leads NL in extra base hits.  Having a terrific season.

I'm glad the Cubs did not bring him back - yes, because of the terms it would have taken, but I also don't think his presence would have been helpful in building a new culture for the team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 25, 2012, 05:47:15 pm
Query: Why are we discussing the relative merits of Santo and ARam in the Cubs Prospects topic?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 25, 2012, 06:03:03 pm
Wishful thinking?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 25, 2012, 06:32:34 pm
If Santo were Ramirez age, I wouldn't have signed him last year either, unless it were to trade him last July.

Not fair.  By the time Santo was ARam's age (34), diabetes had left him a shell of himself.  .221/.293/.299/.591 and a 69 OPS+ for Ronnie in his last season at age 34.

Santo's career OPS+ is higher than Ramirez's.

Ron Santo's achievements as an offensive player are underappreciated by many.

And not just by a little bit.  Santo had a career OPS_ of 125, ARam 116.  Santo led the league in walks 4 times, OBP twice, 3B once and games played 3 times.  ARam has never once led the league in any offensive category.  Santo also finished in the top 10 in WAR 6 times, leading once and finishing 2nd another time; ARam has had one year in the tip 10, finishing 6th.  Santo finished in the top 10 in HR 6 times and in RBI 7 times, finishing 2nd in RBI 3 times; ARam finished 8th in HR once and 9th once, and 4 times in the top 10 in RBI, each time 5th or lower.

Santo was not just the better glove, but much more of a team leader, and also a better hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 26, 2012, 03:26:16 pm
Jason Parks is a writer for Baseball Prospectus

Jason Parks ‏@ProfessorParks
@ChiCityBrian @harrypav VIlla doesn't have the same prospect name, but I wouldn't bet against him having a better ML career than Vitters.

Jason Parks ‏@ProfessorParks
Villanueva doesn't have a crazy ceiling, but he has a good defensive profile at 3B, some legit pop in the bat, and ++ makeup. #Cubs

Jason Parks ‏@ProfessorParks
#Cubs 3B prospect Christian Villanueva was impressive w/ the bat yesterday for Obregon. Showing off his + bat speed; squaring solid velo
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 27, 2012, 10:42:16 am
Squaring solid velocity is one thing.  Squaring breaking stuff is another.  Given his high K-rate, I can't imagine that's just coincidence, there must be a reason.  More often than not, when a guy K's a bunch it reflects some problems in the eyes/brain in terms of processing breaking balls.  When that's the case, it's not the most fixable of problems, in most cases. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 27, 2012, 10:51:01 am
Craig, the only time Villanueva has ever had a really high K-rate was in his 95 PA sample with Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 27, 2012, 11:21:32 am
True.  It hasn't been REALLY high before.  More just kinda high. 

But when you're K'ing at over 22% (per AB) at Myrtle Beach, while walking <6% of the time (per AB), with a K/BB ratio of 3.5:1, that looks like a K-concern to me that pre-existed Daytona.  I always interpret the K-rate in context with the walk rate.  If a guy walks a fair bit, that probably means he takes some pitches and gets into more walk-and-K-possible counts. 

Doesn't mean it's career-prohibitive, if he hits enough HR and/or reduces the problem some.  Hopefully he will. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 27, 2012, 11:51:15 pm
Soler: 1-1, 2B, 3 RBI, 2 BB

Almora: 0-1, 2 BB, K, SB

Amaya: 1-1, RBI, SB, 2 BB, 2 E



http://www.thecubreporter.com/09272012/soler-energy-cubs-way-future#more
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on September 28, 2012, 08:14:03 am
Those young Cubs don't walk enough.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 28, 2012, 09:25:17 am
From the link Chris posted: The Cubs drew nine walks today, bringing their five-game Instructs total to 45 BB, including two nine-walk games.

Impressive as that sounds, I think the numbers might not be accurate.  It mentions "two nine-walk games," with the implication being that the 9 walk games were the highs.... but if the team drew 45 walks in 5 games, that is an AVERAGE of 9 walks a game.

So while it certainly appears there is major improvement there, and plenty of reason to believe coaches have moved in a new direction, the numbers offered might be a bit off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 28, 2012, 09:57:41 am
The actual figures are

First game 9 walks

Second game 9 walks

Third game 0 walks

Fourth game 0 walks

Fifth game 27 walks
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 28, 2012, 10:02:09 am
Nick Struck, the Cubs minors Pitcher of the Year, reminds me of Ricky Nolasco.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on September 28, 2012, 10:37:03 am
From BA:

NORTHWEST LEAGUE
TOP 20 PROSPECTS
1. Mike Zunino, c, Everett (Mariners)
2. Dan Vogelbach, 1b, Boise (Cubs)
3. Victor Sanchez, rhp, Everett (Mariners)
4. Joe Ross, rhp, Eugene (Padres)
5. Tom Murphy, c, Tri-City (Rockies)
6. Marco Hernandez, ss, Boise (Cubs)
7. Jeimer Candelario, 3b, Boise (Cubs)
8. C.J. Edwards, rhp, Spokane (Rangers)
9. Gioskar Amaya, 2b, Boise (Cubs)
10. Patrick Kievelhan, 3b, Everett (Mariners)
11. Mac Williamson, of, Salem-Keizer (Giants)
12. Rosell Herrera, ss/3b, Tri-City (Rockies)
13. Jose Valdespina, rhp, Spokane (Rangers)
14. Dane Phillips, c, Eugene (Padres)
15. Stephen Bruno, inf, Boise (Cubs)
16. Trey Martin, of, Boise (Cubs)
17. Tayler Scott, rhp, Boise (Cubs)
18. Jeremy Baltz, of, Eugene (Padres)
19. Ketel Marte, ss/2b, Everett (Mariners)
20. Taylor Cole, rhp, Vancouver (Blue Jays)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 28, 2012, 11:22:22 am
One third of the top prospects are Cubs.  How many teams in the league?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 28, 2012, 11:31:29 am
One third of the top prospects are Cubs.  How many teams in the league?

Eight.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on September 28, 2012, 11:51:57 am
One third of the top prospects are Cubs.  How many teams in the league?

And 3 of the top 7, 4 of tbe top 9. That's encouraging. Or it would be if NW league results meant anything.
 :-)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 28, 2012, 12:25:42 pm
And 3 of the top 7, 4 of tbe top 9. That's encouraging. Or it would be if NW league results meant anything.
 :-)

 :)

Hey I'm glad we got 7 guys on the list, and it's a good sign that our farm system is starting to get replenished.  You have to start somewhere in rebuilding this farm system.

But here's one of the reasons why I don't get overly excited about what happens in the Northwest League, and I've posted this in the past when we haven't had as loaded of a team as we did this year in Boise. 

Here are the NWL Top 20's from 2004 to 2007.  You're talking usually about 2 to 3 guys per year from this league who genuinely turn out to be competent major league players.  (And I feel like I'm kind of stretching it a little bit by bolding buys like Suzuki, Mayberry, Ohlendorf, Colvin, Hundley, and Saunders.) Between 2006 and 2007, you really only have Mat Latos who's become a really good player, although Andrew Bailey did well before getting hurt.

Having 7 guys in the Top 20 improves our chances of hitting the jackpot of landing the one or sometimes two genuinely good big leaguers who make the NWL Top 20, though.  That's pretty much the most encouraging thing you can take from that.

2004

TOP 20 PROSPECTS

1. Javier Herrera, of, Vancouver
2. Ryan Harvey, of, Boise
3. Carlos Gonzalez, of, Yakima
4. Craig Whitaker, rhp, Salem-Keizer
5. Matt Tuiasosopo, ss, Everett
6. Juan Morillo, rhp, Tri-City
7. Richie Robnett, of, Vancouver
8. Asdrubal Cabrera, ss, Everett
9. Matt Macri, 3b, Tri-City
10. Chris Carter, of/dh, Yakima
11. Jim Miller, rhp, Tri-City
12. Kurt Suzuki, c, Vancouver
13. Eric Hurley, rhp, Spokane
14. Shawn Nottingham, lhp, Everett
15. A.J. Shappi, rhp, Yakima
16. Landon Powell, c, Vancouver
17. Ross Ohlendorf, rhp, Yakima
18. Orlando Mercado Jr., c, Yakima
19. Mike Nickeas, c, Spokane
20. Tomas Santiago, rhp, Tri-City

2005

1. Shane Lindsay, rhp, Tri-City
2. Donald Veal, lhp, Boise
3. Taylor Teagarden, c, Spokane
4. Nick Hundley, c, Eugene
5. Pablo Sandoval, 3b, Salem-Keizer
6. Luis Valbuena, 2b, Everett
7. Dan Griffin, rhp, Salem-Keizer
8. John Mayberry Jr, of, Spokane
9. Ben Copeland, of, Salem-Keizer
10. Chase Headley, 3b, Eugene
11. Jimmy Shull, rhp, Vancouver
12. Michael Mooney, of, Salem-Keizer
13. Michael Saunders, of, Everett
14. Steve Murphy, of, Spokane
15. Edgar Guaramato, rhp, Everett
16. Zach Simons, rhp, Tri-City
17. Stephen Kahn, rhp, Everett
18. Jason Ray, rhp, Vancouver
19. Justin Sellers, ss, Vancouver
20. Mark Reed, c, Boise

2006

1. Tyler Colvin, of, Boise (Cubs)
2. Shane Lindsay, rhp, Tri-City (Rockies)
3. Matt Sulentic, of, Vancouver (Athletics)
4. Emmanuel Burriss, ss, Salem-Keizer (Giants)
5. Clye Hankerd, of, Yakima (Diamondbacks)
6. Tony Butler, lhp, Everett (Mariners)
7. Kasey Kiker, lhp, Spokane (Rangers)
8. Matt Antonelli, 3b, Eugene (Padres)
9. Mark Pawelek, lhp, Boise (Cubs)
10. Jermaine Mitchell, of, Vancouver (Athletics)
11. Josh Sullivan, rhp, Tri-City (Rockies)
12. Chris Davis, 1b/of, Spokane (Rangers)
13. Chad Tracy, c, Spokane (Rangers)
14. Chad Huffman, of, Eugene (Padres)
15. Daniel Mayora, ss, Tri-City (Rockies)
16. Brooks Brown, rhp, Yakima (Diamondbacks)
17. Andrew Bailey, rhp, Vancouver (Athletics)
18. Scott Deal, rhp, Vancouver (Athletics)
19. Kam Mickolio, rhp, Everett (Mariners)
20. Adam Cowart, rhp, Salem-Keizer (Giants)

2007

1. Matt Latos, rhp, Eugene (Padres)
2. Josh Donaldson, c, Boise (Cubs
3. Juan Ramirez, rhp, Everett (Mariners)
4. Tony Thomas, 2b, Boise (Cubs)
5. Fabio Castillo, rhp, Spokane (Rangers)
6. Kellen Kulbacki, of, Eugene (Padres)
7. Tommy Hunter, rhp, Spokane (Rangers)
8. Greg Halman, of, Everett (Mariners)
9. Helder Velazquez, ss, Tri City (Rockies)
10. Matt Mangini, 3b, Everett (Mariners)
11. Corey Brown, of, Vancouver (Athletics)
12. Bruce Billings, rhp, Tri City (Rockies)
13. Cory Riordan, rhp, Tri City (Rockies)
14. Mitch Canham, c, Eugene (Padres)
15. Robinson Fabian, rhp, Tri City (Rockies)
16. Kyler Burke, of, Boise (Cubs)
17. Edward Paredes, lhp, Everett (Mariners)
18. Chris Huseby, rhp, Boise (Cubs)
19. Brian Rike, of, Tri City (Rockies)
20. Jake Brigham, rhp, Spokane (Rangers)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 28, 2012, 12:45:04 pm
Pretty much between 2004 and 2007, you had 13 out of the 80 top prospects from the Northwest League pan out to be at the very minimum a competent major league player or a 16% chance.

And actually with 7 Boise prospects on the list, if you give 16% odds to someone in that group panning out, we should on average get one competent major league player from the bunch.  That actually isn't all that bad if you really think about it. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 28, 2012, 12:58:29 pm
The nice thing about having a bunch of guys is you get a bunch of writeups.  We haven't gotten a lot of organized writeups/analyses on some of these guys. 

But certainly JR is right, it speaks to the weakness of the league when guys like Bruno and Martin are top prospects, and when Hernandez, Candelerio, and Amaya are all top-10 prospects.  Heh, this is a league where guys like Donald Veal, Tony Thomas, Josh Donaldson, and Ryan Harvey were viewed as top-4 guys!  It's just not a magnet for top prospects.  Sometimes there is a high-draft top prospect like Zunino. 

But most premium college picks don't ever show up in the NWL, or if they do they don't spend enough time in NWL to rank.  Most premium HS guys don't spend much time there either.  Baez spent a couple games there last September, but otherwise jumped straight to full.  Almora spent a little time, but not enough to qualify, and he won't be on that list next year.  Hopefully Vogelbach will be the exception, but most guys who spent their second year in NWL probably aren't being viewed as elite guys. 

That said, I wonder if the signing date changes anything?  Would Zunino have signed early enough to qualify a year ago?  Perhaps if Vogelbach had signed earlier last year, perhaps he'd have been up at Peoria before he'd have had chance to qualify?   


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 28, 2012, 01:39:40 pm
That said, I wonder if the signing date changes anything?  Would Zunino have signed early enough to qualify a year ago?  Perhaps if Vogelbach had signed earlier last year, perhaps he'd have been up at Peoria before he'd have had chance to qualify?   

Nah, early signing, late signing, that sort of thing doesn't make any difference.  Seemed to almost be a consensus on that... at least here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 28, 2012, 02:15:51 pm
One thing I think is a little surprising is Marco Hernandez rating ahead of Candelario and Amaya.  This is the second straight year that Hernandez has surprisingly finished ahead of Amaya in a league Top 20 (surprising to me anyway).

Granted Candelario didn't put up great numbers there, but he and Amaya both generally have gotten a little more hype from the Cubs than Hernandez.

Hernandez must have some really flashy tools at shortstop or something to keep getting ranked ahead of some of our more "famous" Latin prospects in his age range.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 28, 2012, 02:30:00 pm
2.    Dan Vogelbach, 1b, Boise Hawks
Age: 19  B-T: L-R  Ht.: 6-0 Wt.: 250  Drafted: Bishop Verot HS, Fort Myers, Fla., 2011 (2nd round).
Signed for $1.6 million as a 2011 second-round pick, Vogelbach batted .322/.410/.641 with 17 homers between the Rookie-level Arizona League and the NWL in his first full pro season. His power earned him that big bonus, but he also has pure hitting ability.

"He has a real feel to hit," Vancouver manager Clayton McCullough said. "He has a plan when he goes up there to hit. He has a very advanced approach. He's as good of a hitter as anybody in this league."

Vogelbach will need to continue to mash because he doesn't have much in the way of other skills. He's a baseclogger who lacks athleticism and will have to work hard to even be an adequate defender at first base.

6.    Marco Hernandez, ss, Boise Hawks
Age: 19  B-T: L-R  Ht.: 6-0 Wt.: 170  Signed: Dominican Republic, '09
Hernandez beat out 2011 first-round pick Javier Baez for the starting shortstop job at low Class A Peoria to start this season, but the Midwest League proved to be too fast with him. He looked like a different player at Boise, where he made some offensive adjustments and regained his confidence.

"He really came on and was the most improved hitter on the team," Boise hitting coach Bill Buckner said. "Most of it was pitch selection. He finally realized that by getting good pitches to hit that he's a better hitter."

Hernandez still has room to improve in terms of plate discipline and pitch recognition, but he shows good bat control and eventually should have the strength to hit 15 homers annually. He has good athleticism and is a 65 runner on the 20-80 scouting scale. He has very good footwork at shortstop, with nice actions and average arm strength.
AB    R    H    2B    3B    HR    RBI    BB    SO    SB    CS    AVG    OBP    SLG
269    39    77    12    4    5    38    10    36    8    3    .286    .310    .416

7.    Jeimer Candelario, 3b, Boise Hawks
Age: 18  B-T: B-R  Ht.: 6-1 Wt.: 180  Signed: Dominican Republic, '10
After Candelario tore up the Rookie-level Dominican Summer League in his 2011 pro debut, the Cubs aggressively jumped him to Boise as an 18-year-old. The youngest regular in the NWL, he ranked fourth with 47 RBIs.

Candelario has a smooth, handsy swing from both sides of the plate and projects to be an above-average hitter with solid power. He shows good plate discipline and pitch recognition, and heuses the entire field. Most of his value lies in his bat, because he's a below-average runner and fringy defender (albeit with the requisite arm strength) at the hot corner.

"He's got the perfect body for third base," Buckner said. "He's got some power from both sides of the plate. Of course he's real young, but he's got a great attitude too. Nothing bothers him. I think he's going to be a 20-home run guy. He's just 18 years old and he's going to be big and strong."

9.    Gioskar Amaya, 2b, Boise Hawks
Age: 19  B-T: R-R  Ht.: 5-11 Wt.: 175  Signed: Venezuela '09
Amaya showed off his best tool (his bat) by hitting .377 in the Arizona League last year, but he didn't hit a single home run. This summer he popped eight and also led the NWL with 12 triples, showing improved power with his short, quick swing. A sneaky above-average runner who profiles as a tablesetter, he needs to continue to improve his pitch recognition.

Amaya and Hernandez have been teammates for the past three seasons now. The two alternated in the middle of the diamond in the AZL, but Hernandez is the better defender and Amaya played exclusively at second base in 2012. His range and arm are just a bit subpar to play shortstop but work fine at second base.

15.    Stephen Bruno, inf, Boise Hawks
Age: 21  B-T: R-R  Ht.: 5-9 Wt.: 165  Drafted: Virginia, 2012 (7th round).
Despite his undersized build, Bruno always has produced at the plate. In his pro debut, he led the NWL in batting (.361), hits (91) and on-base percentage (.442).

Bruno uses a compact swing and stays behind the ball really well. A pure hitter who has no problem handling premium velocity, he provides more power to the gaps than over the fence. He's fearless and doesn't give an inch at the plate—as evidenced by his 20 hit by pitches, which ranked sixth in the minor leagues.

"He's amazing," Buckner said. "The guy hit the ball hard three times every game. He just never takes a bad swing."

A solid defender who fits best at second base, Bruno has enough arm strength and range to play almost anywhere on the diamond. He started games everywhere except pitcher, catcher and first base for the Hawks this summer. He has average speed but needs to get better jumps on the bases.

16.    Trey Martin, of, Boise Hawks
Age: 19  B-T: R-R  Ht.: 6-2 Wt.: 188  Drafted: Brookwood HS, Snellville, Ga., 2011 (13th round).
It's easy to dream on Martin because he has a wiry, athletic build and loose, natural actions. He has plenty of room to continue filling out and add power. He has long arms that create natural leverage in his swing.

Martin has good hand-eye coordination, but his stroke gets too long at times and leaves him vulnerable to being tied up on fastballs inside. He's a well-above average runner, though he needs work on reading pitchers and improving his jumps on the bases. Even if he doesn't break out with the bat, he has major league defensive value and solid arm strength.

"He's a big league center fielder right now," Boise manager Mark Johnson said. "You could put him out there and he'd be better than some of the big leaguers right now. Everything he does, he just makes it look routine. He covers a lot of ground because his stride is so long. He just floats out there in the outfield and takes effortless routes."
AB    R    H    2B    3B    HR    RBI    BB    SO    SB    CS    AVG    OBP    SLG
204    26    55    5    4    3    23    13    48    6    5    .270    .318    .377

17.    Tayler Scott, rhp, Boise Hawks
Age: 20  B-T: R-R  Ht.: 6-3 Wt.: 165  Drafted: Notre Dame Prep, Scottsdale, Ariz., 2011 (5th round).
Scott's family moved to the United States from South Africa at the beginning of his high school career, so he's relatively inexperienced for a high school pitcher from a warm-weather state. That contributed to the Cubs' decision to keep him in short-season ball during his first full year as a pro.

While Scott has a solid three-pitch mix, he's still learning how to command it and miss bats. He creates groundouts with a 90-92 mph sinker, a tight 78-80 mph curveball and a decent changeup. He profiles as a back-of-the-rotation starter with the chance to be better because he still has projection remaining in his thin frame.

A standout soccer player in high school Scott has outstanding athleticism that helps him repeat his clean delivery. He works quickly, fields his position well and controls the running game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 28, 2012, 03:39:49 pm
From those of us sans subscription, thanks JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 28, 2012, 04:11:31 pm
Cubs Den talks about the BA ratings

Quote
There were  7 Cubs prospects on the list, including 4 in the top 10.  They would have had at least one more had Albert Almora had enough ABs to qualify.  He may have even ranked first.

Quote
Also mentioned...

C Wilson Contreras nearly made the list too, which means the entire Boise lineup either made it, didn't have enough ABs (Almora), or just missed (Contreras).  Contreras was called raw but with "loud tools".

Speaking of Almora, it was said that he would have ranked 2nd had he qualified.

Bruno has a chance to skip Kane County and go to Daytona.  He can be either a starter or super utility guy long term.

Vogelbach will not make the top 100.

Jose Arias was at 93-95 but did not show much else.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/boise-dominates-bas-nwl-top-20/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/boise-dominates-bas-nwl-top-20/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 28, 2012, 07:26:56 pm
Cubs Den talks about the BA ratings


Vogelbach will not make the top 100.
http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/boise-dominates-bas-nwl-top-20/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/boise-dominates-bas-nwl-top-20/)

If he doesn't, it will likely be a result of folks not looking at his performance on the field, or his stat line relative to his age, but instead merely looking at his weight and whether  he fits their idea of "athleticism."

Mike Zunino was the only guy in the league with a better OPS than Vogelbach -- 1.210 to 1.031, and Zunino is two years older than Vogelbach, yet since Zunino 6-2 and 220, and a 1st round pick (3rd overall), he will undoubtedly be included in the top 100.  For me, I'll take the guy who is two years younger, even if he doesn't "look like a baseball player."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 28, 2012, 07:48:06 pm
It isn't surprising that only 16% of the top NW league turned out to be good ML players.

But I suspect that if you made a list of all the others in the league that didn't make the top 20 list, the percentage of those becoming good ML players is well below 5%, and probably closer to 1%
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 28, 2012, 08:45:00 pm
I don't have much problem with Vogelbach not making top-100 lists.  He's in short-season, and scouts as a DH by most accounts.  I can see why people would want to see him hit in full season and/or provide more evidence that he'll be able to play a big-league position than he's apparently shown thus far. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 28, 2012, 09:10:26 pm
I don't have much problem with Vogelbach not making top-100 lists.  He's in short-season, and scouts as a DH by most accounts.  I can see why people would want to see him hit in full season and/or provide more evidence that he'll be able to play a big-league position than he's apparently shown thus far. 

Two problems with that, Craig:

1) My understanding is that those who have actually watched Vogelbach play (i.e. really scouted him, instead of simply looking at how much he weighs) believe he not only will have no problem fielding firstbase acceptably well, he likely would have no problem playing LF in the majors;

2) As I mentioned, Zunino is almost certain to be in the top 100, despite being two years older, only had 22 more plate appearances than Vogelbach.

If Zunino makes the list and Vogelbach doesn't, it is not likely because of either their performance on the field or scouting opinions of those who have actually watched them play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 28, 2012, 11:41:54 pm
jes, I think I disagree.  I think there are a number of people who have watched Vogelbach.  And while the Cubs may judge otherwise, I'm thinking that some other outside scouts who have seen him still question his defensive potential. 

Second, I know that there are a bunch of scouts who actually have watched Zunino, and have been impressed with his defensive scouting.  Being an excellent defensive catcher is quite different in value from being a possible-average 1B or LF. 

I have no problem with scouts using scouting.  That's a lot of what top-100 lists etc. are about, using scouting to project.  I recall years ago people fussing because Prior was being rated on par or ahead of Juan Cruz on some prospect lists, even though Prior had pitched only in college and Cruz was kinda wild but had shown pro success.  But every prospect is in different places development-wise and in terms of experience.  I also don't think it's smart to dismiss "top three pick" status.  I think many of the same qualities that impressed scouts enough to merit top-3 pick status still impress them now. 

I'm really interested in Vogelbach's possibilities.  And I love hitters who hit, hit HR's, and take walks all at the same time.  If you hit like Manny Ramirez, you can field like Manny Ramirez and still be an MVP candidate.  But there's a lot less margin.  Vogelbach's going to need to hit an awful lot.  He may do so.  But if he does, his time on the prospect lists will come, like next year. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 29, 2012, 05:07:26 am
Craig, while I have no doubts that lots of scouts have watched Vogelbach, those who prepare prospects lists without including Vogelbach are not necessarily among them.

We very seldom see prospect lists and ratings of actual scouts.  Instead we see prospect lists and ratings of folks who TALK to scouts, and who look at the same stats you and I look at.  If there were to be anyone who has actually watched Vogelbach play at first base who were to say the guy is such a whale he can't move, will never be able to come in on a bunt, will have to be positioned within five feet of first base to make it there in time to take a throw, and has so little flexibility that he can't stretch for a throw, can't field a short hop and can't raise his hands over his head to bring down a high throw, then I would agree that he is going to have to hit incredibly well to be tolerable in the majors.  If there were to be anyone who has seen him shagging flies in the OF and seen that he can't catch anything that requires him to take more than two steps from where he started, then I would agree that there is no possibility he can ever play in the OF.  But we have not seen those things, and the comments we have seen from those who have actually watch him play and watched him field his position have been uniformly positive, not glowing, but positive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on September 29, 2012, 07:43:23 am
It it true that many scouts believe Vogelbach will play an adequate defensive first first base.  But that is a long way from believing that he will play a GOOD defensive first base.  And an adequate first base is a LONG LONG way from an excellent defensive catcher.

Vogelbach has two outstanding tools, both of which are somewhat suspect at least until they face high A pitching.  The other three are average at best.  I can understand why those doing the rating want to wait a while before getting on the bandwagon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on September 29, 2012, 08:23:19 am
The thing I find suspicious about many reports is that not all opinions are based on actual observation.  Too many prospects; not enough time.  So they go by hearsay, they read other publications, they look at stats, and they formulate their rankings.  Got to take all of them with a grain of salt.  They are fun, but not very accurate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on September 29, 2012, 08:30:33 am
Amen, Curt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 29, 2012, 09:37:18 am
What Dave said on the defense.  Defense matters, and the discussion on Vogel's seems more a question of whether he can be adequate or average then whether he might become outstanding.  Even the more positive reports I've seen, they think he can become average or adequate or that he can play a position, but I haven't seen anybody projecting potential gold-glove or anything like that.

There are a lot of good, talented prospects in baseball who might become really excellent if they develop well and if their potential problems end up being not too bad.  Vogelbach is one of them, but isn't unique in that regard.  He may well end up becoming one of the successes, but I can't really conclude that it's some gross injustice to rank 100 guys ahead, at this stage of his career.

I'm somewhat hopeful that he can show something as a LF.  Obviously he's very slow (at least he looked very slow on the couple of you-tube doubles I've seen), so that's going to limit him in LF.  But LF is a much less important position than 1B, IMO.  A 1B is involved in a LOT of challenging plays.  I think 1B gets more ground balls, often fast and difficult, than a LF gets fly balls.  And then the 1B gets all the throws, many of which are very challenging.  So if Vogelbach becomes a big-time hitter, more than justifying a spot in an NL lineup, I'd much rather have him as a mediocre left fielder than a mediocre 1B.  A mediocre LF just doesn't cost you as many plays as a mediocre 1B.  And of course, there's Rizzo. 

As a 1B, he has two physical issues to deal with.  The obvious one is his weight; will he have quickness/mobility to have range on bunts and grounders, and will he have the flexibility to get down on grounders and low throws?  Those may be problems, but a heavyweight can still have great quickness and coordination, so while those may be problems I'm not sure that they have to be. 

Vogel is 6'0", and from pictures and Youtube his legs look short.   I think his compact, short frame and his short limbs are highly conducive to his tremendous potential as a hitter.  He's got the strength to whip his short levers through the strike zone, but he doesn't have the same long-swing plate-coverage and late-adjustment-to-movement challenges that long-levered hitters have.  He's powerful without needing the long swing. 

But those same short legs/arms make him a small target for throws at 1B.  DLee is 6'5" with long arms.  He could stretch, and that enabled him to make some plays on throws high, low, and wide.  Rizzo is 6'3".  I think Vogelbach isn't going to be a big target for inaccurate throws, and over a career a 1B sees a lot of those.  Is it a showstopper?  No.  But it is a reality. 

Manny Ramirez was a great hitter, a lousy (and lazy) left fielder, and an MVP.  If Aram OPS's at .900, people might know that his defense isn't good but they still know he's an overall asset.  Every player is composite of pros and cons, and if you hit enough you can be average or well below defensively and still be an overall asset, perhaps a super-huge asset.  So I'm very optimistic that Vogelbach will be such a hitter that he'll be a star even if he's quite poor defensively.  Or that he can hit like an MVP and make himself into average or close defensively, and not be a defensive issue really at all.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on September 29, 2012, 10:36:40 am
Just going back through some of my old BA Handbooks, the Cubs put 6 players each year in the NWL Top 20 between 2000 and 2002.  Really, I think saying 1/6 or 1/7 top NWL prospects having respectable big league careers turns out to be a good rule of thumb when you look at these lists.

2000 - 4. Aaron Krawiec, 6. Ryan Jorgensen, 10. Wilton Chavez, 13. Todd Wellemeyer, 18. Nic Jackson, 19. Mike Mallory

2001 - 1. J.J. Johnson, 4. Angel Guzman, 6. Dontrelle Willis, 7. Corey Slavik, 11. Condor Cash, 19. Keto Anderson

2002 - 1. Andy Sisco, 4. Luke Hagerty, 5. Jae-Kuk Ryu, 12. Kevin Collins, 16. Ricky Nolasco, 20. Jason Fransz
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on September 29, 2012, 11:16:00 am
In addition, Guzman, Sisco, Ryu and Ryan Jorgensen all had their MLB cups of coffee.                         
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on September 29, 2012, 11:31:57 am
J****! A few of us may remember his father from another board.
Shees,! Why is " J o r g y !" censored?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on September 29, 2012, 12:11:53 pm
We've got a really bad team.  We didn't have a huge collection of franchise-changing talent at Iowa or Tennessee. 

"Cup-of-coffee" guys aren't going to get the Cubs turned around. 

Other than maybe Peoria, with Soler and Baez, Boise was probably our hottest spot with our biggest collection of talent. 

It may be wishful thinking, I understand that.  But I'm not going to hope and be satisfied if the Boise bunch gets us one "cup of coffee" Sisco/Jorgensen type guy and one Wellemeyer/Nolasco type "success".  If we're going to move from being the 29th best team to being a 2nd best team, or close, we need to get some impact guys and hope to do better than 1-in-6 shot to get a Wellemeyer. 

Maybe I'm off a little.   Maybe Hernandez/Candelerio/Amaya/Bruno/Martin/Scott/Arias/Contreras, maybe that is not the pool where we should be really looking for impact.  Vogelbach has a chance, maybe Candelerio of Scott or Martin.  But I guess is you take Vogelbach out and bunch Hernandez/Candelerio/Amaya/Bruno/MArtin/Scott, and toss in Contreras and ARias, that is a pool where if you get one solid-average regular, and perhaps another bench or "coffee" guy, I should be pretty happy with that.  We're not really looking for franchise players or multiple-time-all-stars from that pool.  If one of Candelerio or Amaya or Martin becomes a starter that's solid and that you aren't looking to replace each winter, that probably would be a more-than-could-be-expected outcome. 

If we leave Vogelbach, Baez, Soler, Paniagua, Almora, and Maples as the pool from which we hope to get some impact player(s), that may be more realistic.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 29, 2012, 01:30:43 pm
Maybe I'm off a little.   Maybe Hernandez/Candelerio/Amaya/Bruno/Martin/Scott/Arias/Contreras, maybe that is not the pool where we should be really looking for impact.  Vogelbach has a chance, maybe Candelerio of Scott or Martin.  But I guess is you take Vogelbach out and bunch Hernandez/Candelerio/Amaya/Bruno/MArtin/Scott, and toss in Contreras and ARias, that is a pool where if you get one solid-average regular, and perhaps another bench or "coffee" guy, I should be pretty happy with that.  We're not really looking for franchise players or multiple-time-all-stars from that pool.  If one of Candelerio or Amaya or Martin becomes a starter that's solid and that you aren't looking to replace each winter, that probably would be a more-than-could-be-expected outcome.

I'm actually looking for at least one impact player as well as another solid regular and a contributing bench player out of those.

Of course, I also saw Choi as a sure thing....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on September 29, 2012, 04:07:34 pm
Dillon Maples looks to tap into vast potential

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/dillon-maples-looks-to-tap-into-vast-potential/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/09/dillon-maples-looks-to-tap-into-vast-potential/)

Short video included
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on September 29, 2012, 11:21:29 pm
Vogelbach: 1-4, HR, 3 RBI, 2 K

Blackburn: 2-1-0-0-0-2


http://www.thecubreporter.com/09292012/vogelbomb-sinks-snakes-salt-river-fields
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on September 30, 2012, 07:12:57 am
Accoding to Marlin on the PSD forum the Cubs are currently thinking pitcher with the #2 pick as Appel, Stanek, Manaea are top 3 right now.  The Cubs like Maneae as the pick right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on September 30, 2012, 08:24:02 am
Accoding to Marlin on the PSD forum the Cubs are currently thinking pitcher with the #2 pick as Appel, Stanek, Manaea are top 3 right now.  The Cubs like Maneae as the pick right now.

We have a full college/HS season of scouting, growth, maturity (and immaturity), and development before any picks are made.  I know that fans and commentators are determined to try now to predict who will be picked where and by whom in the draft, but I suspect that the Theocracy at this point is simply focusing on whom to scout more closely and what to look for in those prospects based on current evaluations.  I doubt that Theo is making any more effort TODAY as to who the Cubs will draft with their first pick in 2013 than he making an effort TODAY as to what tie he will wear the day the draft starts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 02, 2012, 04:27:14 pm
BA names Javier Baez the top prospect in the MWL

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/ba-names-javier-baez-the-top-prospect-in-the-mwl/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/ba-names-javier-baez-the-top-prospect-in-the-mwl/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 02, 2012, 09:07:44 pm
Soler: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI

Vogelbach: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, SB, K

Amaya: 1-3, RBI, SB, BB


http://www.thecubreporter.com/10022012/soler-vogelbach-supply-cub-power-papago-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 02, 2012, 11:02:21 pm
Al (NYC): Realistically, where do you envision Baez playing once he arrives in Chicago? It seems Castro is entrenched at SS and Vitters re-established himself as a prospect this year and has already reached Chicago. Can you see a move to RF or maybe even 2B for Baez if the Cubs are committed to Castro and Vitters?


Jim Callis: Third base. Baez may be a better shortstop than Castro, though I don't see the Cubs moving him. (Barney is a better shortstop than Castro, for that matter.) Vitters isn't in Baez' class and probably won't be a big league regular, especially at third base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 02, 2012, 11:05:23 pm
Ben (Leland Grove): Had he qualified, about where would you have ranked Jorge Soler? Do you believe he has a higher ceiling than Baez? Do you think he's ready for Daytona?

Jim Callis: Behind the big three (Baez, Sano, Lindor) and somewhere in the midst of the pitchers (Bradley, Syndergaard, Sanchez). I don't think his ceiling is higher than Baez', because Baez had a chance to be a plus-plus hitter w/plus-plus power and play a premium position. I like Baez' overall bat more than Soler's, and his defensive value more as well. I do think Soler is ready for Daytona.

larry (San Luis Obispo): Cubs....mike jensen RHP ....later pick, great numbers. What you got?

Jim Callis: Scouts liked him, too. Solid fastball and curveball, he's a prospect.

Chris (Chicago): Jim, what's your take on Jose Rosario and Starling Peralta? Are the Cubs at risk of losing them if they're left unprotected in the Rule 5 draft?

Jim Callis: Strong arms but not close to big league-ready, don't see protecting them.

Mike (Chicago): Any other cubs close to making the list?

Jim Callis: Nope.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 03, 2012, 10:55:13 am
Marlin over at PSD clarified his comments.  Before Jes posts I believe everyone understands things can change, new people pop up, injuries etc, however, this is the Cubs current thinking.  Manaea would be #1 on the board followed by Ryne Stanek.  The Cubs are looking for a college pitcher and they expect Appel to fall again, as he isn't high on their board or other MLB teams.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 03, 2012, 11:09:07 am
Wasn't Marlin the guy who said we were going to do that 4 way trade with Dempster going to Arizona or something crazy like that?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 03, 2012, 11:42:53 am
Marlin over at PSD clarified his comments.  Before Jes posts I believe everyone understands things can change, new people pop up, injuries etc, however, this is the Cubs current thinking.  Manaea would be #1 on the board followed by Ryne Stanek.  The Cubs are looking for a college pitcher and they expect Appel to fall again, as he isn't high on their board or other MLB teams.

Or, if you think the FO is being devious again, Stanek is #1 and Manaea is #2. Or perhaps they're hoping Appel or Austin Meadows slips to them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 03, 2012, 12:00:37 pm
It's still really early to try to peg who will be the #2 pick in the draft.

For instance, when BA ranked the Top 50 for the 2012 draft on September 16, 2011, Carlos Correa was the #20 prospect, Byron Buxton was the #5 prospect, and Albert Almora was the #37 prospect.

Devin Marrero was the #2 prospect in those rankings, and he wound up falling to 24th in the draft when all was said and done.

If we start a 2013 draft topic soon, you really need to be looking at a lot more than just the top 2 or 3 guys BA has ranked right now.  There's going to be a lot of movement between now and next June.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 03, 2012, 12:48:47 pm
No, that was ABTY and was a complete rumor that he didn't think was likely. He is a reporter that covers the Royals minor leagues and has a lot of scouts that give him info on the Cubs.   Marlin has some connections to the Cubs front office, and is usually well informed on the draft. 

I agree that is really early as well, I just thought the stuff about Appel is interesting.  I also thought Manaea>Stanek was interesting as well.  With high school players in the draft I think there is a lot more movement in where they end up getting ranked vs the college players that have more of a track record, sans injury or horrible season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 03, 2012, 12:53:12 pm
It's eight months (and a full amateur season) until the draft, so it's a bit early (as JR said) to focus on individual candidates. But the strengh of the draft at the high end appears to be college starting pitchers, which fits the Cubs' needs perfectly. There also appear to be quite a few high school catching prospects who might be a good fit for the Cubs in the second round. After that, I expect the Cubs to target pitchers with good velocity and high upsides, but with ever-decreasing floors, through the rest of the early rounds.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 03, 2012, 02:52:04 pm
It's eight months (and a full amateur season) until the draft, so it's a bit early (as JR said) to focus on individual candidates. But the strengh of the draft at the high end appears to be college starting pitchers, which fits the Cubs' needs perfectly.

The difference in performance levels between a hitter or a pitcher between age 16 and age 17 (if a very young senior) or between age 17 and age 18 (if a typical HS senior) or between age 18 and age 19 (if an old HS senior) is quite often dramatic.

Until we see how the HS pitchers do in their senior year, it is way too early to say where the strength at the high end will be found.

At this point it makes sense to talk about who the Cubs should follow or what they should look for in the development of a given prospect, but it is foolish to talk now about who the Cubs will or should draft, and I suspect that is also the attitude of the front office.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 03, 2012, 03:47:16 pm
At this point, the Cubs probably have a list of 300 to 500 candidates they want to see. During the amateur season, they'll add a few interesting candidates and drop a few others due to injuries or underperformance. Multiple scouts will see the top prospects (Appel, Stanek, Manaea, Meadows, etc.) multiple times. I know they'll pay a lot of attention to the available pitchers, and I suspect they may watch the catchers more closely than usual as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 03, 2012, 05:28:51 pm
Dillon Maples walked 5 in 1-1/3 today. Thank god Baez and Vogelbach are working out thus far.

Almora: 1-3, SF, RBI

Soler: 0-2, RBI, BB, K, SB

Paniagua: 2-1/3 -1-0-0-1-3


http://www.thecubreporter.com/10032012/cubs-triple-their-pleasure-defeat-fitch-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 03, 2012, 08:15:46 pm
Thanks for the info, guys.  Manaea sounds very good.  Stanek sounds very good. 

When you're drafting second, the hope is that:
1.   there are a couple of fantastic prospects so that it's win-win regardless of who Houston takes. 
2.  There are a couple of fastastic college prospects.  Less projection involved, less waiting for impact, less time and opportunity for injury to derail. 
3.  For me, the hope is that there are a couple of fantastic college position players. 

I know view 3 isn't necessarily shared by the board.  But if you're choosing between a super-talented position player and a super-talented pitcher at #2, the player is much more likely to stay healthy and super-talented for a dozen years than is the pitcher.  A pitcher who's healthy and throwing 98 now is less likely to still be doing that in six years, much less 12. 

That said, a super-talented college pitcher would be just great.  The draft prospectus, I guess, suggests that there could be several super-talented college pitchers, but perhaps there are none such for college position guys.  Certainly the organization desperately needs super-talented starting pitching.  Plus it's a lot harder to mis-scout a college pitcher at #2 than it is a hitter.  You can see the velocity, the movement, the break, and the control, and if all four aren't there you probably aren't very serious for #2 pick.  But even a hitter who looks great, you aren't that often seeing him face big-league pitching.  And certainly if you're trying to turn around a 100-loss team, some superb pitching can make quicker impact. 

Manaea and Stanek both seem very, very promising. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 03, 2012, 10:08:08 pm
I like Manaea better than Appel or Stanek because he's a LHP with a good fastball. Most of our current crop of lefties can't throw more than an occassional 90 or 91 MPH fastball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 04, 2012, 01:23:15 am
Baseball America top league prospects:

PCL:

#5.  Anthony Rizzo

#15  Brett Jackson

Southern League:

No Cubs

Florida State League:

No Cubs

Carolina League:

#9 Christian Villanueva

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 04, 2012, 02:07:17 am
I'm surprised that Szczur didn't make the FSL list with his speed, defense and .295/.394/.407/.801 slash line. He had 295 AB's, so he was probably around 330 plate appearances. I'm curious who the four prospects that finished ahead of Rizzo were, as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 04, 2012, 06:05:33 pm
http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2012/10/a-look-at-the-initial-2013-draft-order/

The Cubs will almost certainly pick second, 39th and 75th. I said "almost certainly" because one or more of the other teams with a protected first round pick could conceivably sign a free agent requiring compensation, which would cost them a second round pick. So it could, but probably won't, be 2nd, 40th or 41st and 75th.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 04, 2012, 06:37:06 pm
Cubs third round pick in 2012 at #75 overall is equivalent to a mid-second round pick in 2012---#75 in 2012 was the 15th pick in the second round.  Cubs got Underwood near top of second round at #67 overall.

#39 (second round) in 2013 is equivalent to a 2012 high sandwich pick.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 04, 2012, 06:39:22 pm
I'm curious who the four prospects that finished ahead of Rizzo were, as well.

Will Myers
Travis D'Arnaud
Trevor Bauer
Tyler Skaggs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 04, 2012, 07:30:34 pm
Cubs third round pick in 2012 at #75 overall is equivalent to a mid-second round pick in 2012---#75 in 2012 was the 15th pick in the second round.  Cubs got Underwood near top of second round at #67 overall.  #39 (second round) in 2013 is equivalent to a 2012 high sandwich pick.

Yes, that sandwich round was pretty much like a full round.  Hendry rarely got any comp picks, so by usually skipping the sandwich round it was like skipping the "2nd" round.  Some of the comp picks we did get were lucky; Kendall and Pierre.  I'm not sure Hendry would have offered arb to either one had they gone unsigned till the arb deadline. I think Matt Clement was probably the last "earned" comp pick for Hendry, by which I mean a guy who was clearly good enough and desirable enough that he'd command a multi-year contract on the market.  Hendry usually had a great relationship with his players, and would keep anybody he wanted.  If Hendry didn't want to keep a guy, there usually wasn't enough market for the player to trust that the player might not simply accept the arb offer.  Very different with Aram this winter, and kinda gutsy on Pena. 

Drafting 39th is pretty decent. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 04, 2012, 07:41:50 pm
One of the things Epstein did very well in Boston, rivaling what Schuerholz did in Atlanta, was get compensatory picks.  If there is anything to be done in that regard under the new rules, I expect him to continue.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 04, 2012, 07:55:29 pm
Well you're not going to get a lot of compensation picks for guys like Shawn Camp and Manny Corpas.  Looks like it's going to be a while before we have quality enough free agents where we can get any type of free agent compensation.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 04, 2012, 08:34:18 pm
Yes, the new rules are largely minimizing those comp picks.  You've got to let a pretty high-level player go to get one now, which makes sense to me.  Not going to get picks for Jason Kendall and Rondell White guys who you didn't really want back anyway, or at least not if they cost hardly anything. 

There was talk about just holding Dempster and getting a comp pick, but I wonder after the second half that he's had, whether he'd have even gotten enough business to earn a pick? 

Aren't going to get picks for the DeJesus's of the world. 

Maybe after dragging out the Garza stuff, we'll get a comp pick for him after next year.  Not nearly the value they could have gotten for him last winter, or last June, but when you stretch things out with pitchers, that's inevitably at risk of injury and reduced value. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 05, 2012, 12:31:06 am
The comp pick we might get for Garza wouldn't be much higher than 31st under the new CBA, so he'll either sign a contract extension or be traded by July 31. It would be earlier if one or more teams with unprotected first-round picks signed a free agent, or later if one or more teams failed to sign their top pick in the previous draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 05, 2012, 01:10:18 am
Soler: 1-2, 2B, BB

Amaya: 2-4, CS, K

Johnson: 2-2-/3 -1-0-0-2-5

Blackburn: 2-0-0-0-1-2


http://www.thecubreporter.com/10042012/cubs-cant-solve-socratic-problem-speed
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 06, 2012, 10:03:38 pm
Candelario: 1-2, 3B, 3 RBI, K

Wells: 2-1-0-0-0-4

Arias: 2-1/3 -0-1-0-1-3



http://www.thecubreporter.com/10062012/candy-triple-not-so-sweet-angels
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 08, 2012, 08:41:03 am
Meet the Mesa Solar Sox: Position Players and Coaches

Quote
This is the second of two articles highlighting the players from the Cubs organization who will be taking part in the 2012 Arizona Fall League, which starts tomorrow (Monday, October 9).  Today, the CCO will be looking at the position players and coaches that will be suiting up for the Mesa Solar Sox.

http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2012/10/cubsminors10812.php#more (http://chicagocubsonline.com/archives/2012/10/cubsminors10812.php#more)

Play begins Tuesday, October 9

I plan to make at least one trip to Mesa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 08, 2012, 08:46:22 am
Quote
His [Blackburn's] breaking ball is his best pitch, and although his fastball tops out at (maybe) 90 MPH, he sets up his plus-curve by spotting his pedestrian fastball with precision. He has excellent control
Az Phil


Phil has been impressed with Nathan Dorris.  College lefty, 17th round pick, chose Vandy over Braves out of HS (JR will like that), transferred a couple of times, had some injury issues I think, had unimpressive numbers at southern Illinois (4.17 ERA, 6HR/97H/35BB/80K/82IP). 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 08, 2012, 11:17:37 am
9.    Christian Villanueva, 3b, Myrtle Beach (Rangers)
Age: 21  B-T: R-R  Ht.: 5-11 Wt.: 160  Signed: Dominican Republic '10.
Villanueva batted .567 with two homers in his final eight games with Myrtle Beach before the Rangers packaged him with Pelicans righthander Kyle Hendricks to get Ryan Dempster from the Cubs. Javier Baez projects as Chicago's third baseman of the future, but Villanueva has the all-around talent to force his way into the lineup.

Villanueva uses a short, compact stroke to hit line drives to all fields. He understands the strike zone and puts himself in position to hit. Primarily a doubles hitter at this point, he shows sporadic power to the pull side and could develop into an average home run threat.

With solid range, soft hands and a plus arm, Villanueva has all the tools to play third base. His first-step quickness shows up in the field and on the basepaths, where he can use his average speed to swipe the occasional bag.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 08, 2012, 03:00:16 pm
Frank (Chicago): Where would Javier Baez have placed on this list, were he eligible? Are you as high on him as your colleague Jim Callis?

J.J. Cooper: Hi Frank. I don't know if I'm as high on Baez as Jim is, but I'm a big fan. He's a special hitter and he's better defensively than was expected. If I had to guess, he would have been in the top four, but it's hard to give a certain answer on that, as I wasn't asking a whole lot of people about him, since I knew he would qualify. One manager described him as having a Dante Bichette-esque swing where he had a big swing, but in a controlled manner with good balance.


Andrew (Chicago): How close was Alcantara to making the list? What does he need to improve to become a legit SS prospect next year in double A?

J.J. Cooper: Very close. I'd say he was No. 21 or No. 22. Alcantara's bat was probably the best of all the many intriguing shortstops in the FSL this year. He has a very good arm, which allows him to make some plays defensively as well, although there were more questions about his defense than his bat.

 Justin (Nashville): The three best prospects for Daytona appear to be Matt Szczur, Ronald Torreyes, and Arismendy Alcantara. Did any of these three come close to cracking the Top 20? How would you rank all three as prospects?


J.J. Cooper: If I was ranking how close it would be Alcantara, Szczur then Torreyes. I've already talked about Alcantara. As far as Torreyes, guys still like him, but when you are a really short 2B, you have to put up numbers to answer concerns about your ceiling. This year for the first time, Torreyes struggled to put up those numbers. Don't give up on him by any stretch, but he's more likely to be a role player type than an impact everyday guy. With Szczur, I had one scout say "at some point, we've got to stop giving him a pass for being young in baseball experience." The concerns were that Szczur's swing doesn't allow the ball to carry much--he needs to learn how to backspin the ball more if he's going to be more than a gap-to-gap guy. His tools are impressive and he would have been in the 25-to-30 range.

Justin (Nashville): Where would Christian Villenueva ranked if he had been eligible? He was ranked 9th in the Carolina League, although it seems like the FSL Top 20 is deeper.

J.J. Cooper: I'm just going off of past Villanueva knowledge, but somewhere probably around where Ozuna ended up. I didn't ask anyone about him because so few people got to see him in his 4 weeks in the league.

Justin (Nashville): Any pitchers at Daytona that are mildly interesting? It seems like the Austin Kirk, Matt Loosen, Frank Del Valle, Robert Whitenack, Kyler Burke, A.J. Morris, etc. collection of pitchers consist of back end rotation or middle relief prospects. Will any of these guys be in the Cubs Top 30 this year?

J.J. Cooper: I didn't have one manager or scout from another club bring up any Daytona pitcher. That doesn't mean none of them will make the Top 30 for the Cubs, but none came close to making the FSL Top 20.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 08, 2012, 03:04:38 pm
Kind of interesting that J.J. Cooper would rate our High-A prospects as Villanueva, Alcantara, Szczur, and Torreyes.  I've still viewed Szczur as a Top 4-5 or so prospect in the organization, but at least in Cooper's eyes, that's not the case.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 08, 2012, 04:09:00 pm
That Justin guy from Nashville is real pushy.  Bet he's a snot-nose brat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 08, 2012, 04:10:40 pm
Kind of interesting that J.J. Cooper would rate our High-A prospects as Villanueva, Alcantara, Szczur, and Torreyes.  I've still viewed Szczur as a Top 4-5 or so prospect in the organization, but at least in Cooper's eyes, that's not the case.

I have him ranked 12th, but he could shoot up the list very rapidly if he could show a bit more HR power. He only has 14 HR in three minor league season (1100+ plate appearances). He's supposed to be extremely coachable, and he's obviously athletic with spurs on, but he really needs to re-tool his swing. There's a world of difference between a plus CF with five-homer power and one with 15-20 home runs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on October 08, 2012, 04:12:54 pm
Any word if Matt Szczur will head to Camp Colvin?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 08, 2012, 04:16:52 pm
Cooper seems to insinuate that Szczur can't be much of a prospect if he doesn't hit homers. I don't get that logic and it won't be applied when time comes to rank Billy Hamilton.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 08, 2012, 04:23:08 pm
For what it's worth (not much), here's my top 30:

(1-10) Baez, Soler, Almora, Vizcaino, Villanueva, Candelario, Vogelbach, Amaya, Paniagua, Vitters
(11-20) Watkins, Szczur, Maples, Johnson, Wells, Zych, Lake, McNutt, Ha, Whitenack
(21-30) Peralta, Underwood, Blackburn, Alcantara, Scott, Rosario, Hernandez, Bruno, Golden, McNeil

I'm sure that I've ranked Alcantara and Hernandez too low, but they're not much more likely to play SS every day for the Cubs than I am.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 08, 2012, 04:25:10 pm
Cooper seems to insinuate that Szczur can't be much of a prospect if he doesn't hit homers. I don't get that logic and it won't be applied when time comes to rank Billy Hamilton.

Szczur is a fast CFer who after three minor league seasons is 68-19 in steals, which is not at all bad.  Hamilton is a fast SS who is a year younger than Szczur (and while he has one more season in the minors, he only played in 43 games that season) and is 320-69 in steals.

There might be some reason to be less concerned about Hamilton's lack of power, or at least to think of factors compensate for it when ranking him as a prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 08, 2012, 04:28:03 pm
Good list.  No Torreyes?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on October 08, 2012, 04:29:39 pm
Just FWIW, guys like Law and Goldstein (before he joined the Astros organization) have long said Szczur was more of a Reed Johnson type (maybe even a poor man's Reed Johnson) than any kind of impact prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 08, 2012, 04:32:27 pm
Honorable mentions go to Brett Jackson, who I'd put fifth if he were still an eligible rookie, Lendy Castillo, who I'd put between Wells and Zych, and Carlos Martinez and Daury Torrez, two DSL pitchers who've looked good so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 08, 2012, 04:35:42 pm
Jes, I understand Hamilton steals a lot more often that Szczur, but the two are similar in just about every other facet and Szczur is by accounts the better defender. Hamilton is not going to steal 150 bases at the Major League level.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 08, 2012, 04:36:54 pm
BR, Law also said Vogelbach wasn't near ready for a promotion to Boise, and that was after he personally watched him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 08, 2012, 04:39:34 pm
Good list.  No Torreyes?

No Torreyes. He's behind Barney, Watkins and Amaya among the current 2B crop, far behind Villanueva if he's blocked at 3B by Baez (or Vitters or Stewart), and behind Alcantara and Hernandez if they're blocked at SS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on October 08, 2012, 05:02:43 pm
Figures.  Torreyes was just a throw in in the deal for Travis Wood.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 08, 2012, 05:23:23 pm
Cooper seems to insinuate that Szczur can't be much of a prospect if he doesn't hit homers. I don't get that logic and it won't be applied when time comes to rank Billy Hamilton.

Yeah and Daytona's also a tough place to hit home runs to begin with.  Szczur doesn't have to hit more than 10-15 homers to be an effective player.

I guess for me, on the "exceeded expectations", "met expectations", and "did not meet expectations" scale for this season, I would have said Szczur "met expectations".  Too bad he didn't hit better in Double-A on his first try than he did, but other than that, I think he did OK this season.  I don't think his stock should take too much of a hit because he's not a .300, 20 HR, 50 SB player at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 08, 2012, 06:13:24 pm
Hamilton isn't a SS anymore, either...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 08, 2012, 07:01:56 pm
Marshall was/is one of the best relievers in baseball, not just among lefties only.  A valuable property.  I know Wood has his fans (br and P2..), but I kinda suspect that Theo/Hoyer can't be all that proud of that trade right now.  I think their scouting probably expected more out of Torreyes and perhaps more talent out of Wood than we saw this year.  Even late in a contract, I'd think you could get more for a guy of Marshall's age/ability then a package with no more upside than Wood. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 08, 2012, 07:05:14 pm
The jury is still out on Travis Wood as far as I'm concerned.  It had to be hard going to the mound knowing you had to allow one run or less to win the game.  I'd like to see what he does under normal pressure.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 08, 2012, 07:19:15 pm
Hamilton isn't a SS anymore, either...

In 2012 Hamilton played a total of 132 games, with two different teams.  125 of them were played at SS.  6 times he was a DH.  One time he pinch hit.

In three seasons in the minors, every game the guy has played in the field he has played SS, except for 55 games at 2B in 2010.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=hamilt002bil

Yea, I imagine when he is being rated as a prospect (which is what we were talking about), he won't be considered as a SS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 08, 2012, 07:39:51 pm
Marshall was/is one of the best relievers in baseball, not just among lefties only.  A valuable property.  I know Wood has his fans (br and P2..), but I kinda suspect that Theo/Hoyer can't be all that proud of that trade right now.  I think their scouting probably expected more out of Torreyes and perhaps more talent out of Wood than we saw this year.  Even late in a contract, I'd think you could get more for a guy of Marshall's age/ability then a package with no more upside than Wood.

They may have expected more of Wood, but there is little reason they were disappointed with the way Torreyes finished the season.  He was playing injured the first half, but I would bet they were quite happy with his second half.

First half slash line: .221/.284/.302/.585
2nd half slash line:  .302/.364/.459/.824

That second half slash line is not bad for a 19 year old in Daytona.

Those dismissing him are doing so prematurely.  http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=&sid=t450&t=p_pbp&pid=591720
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 08, 2012, 07:46:06 pm
Marshall was/is one of the best relievers in baseball, not just among lefties only.  A valuable property.  I know Wood has his fans (br and P2..), but I kinda suspect that Theo/Hoyer can't be all that proud of that trade right now.  I think their scouting probably expected more out of Torreyes and perhaps more talent out of Wood than we saw this year.  Even late in a contract, I'd think you could get more for a guy of Marshall's age/ability then a package with no more upside than Wood. 

Marshall would have been a free agent this winter if he hadn't signed an extension with Cincinnati. I'll take several more years of control over Wood, Sappelt and Torreyes over the nothing we'd have now in the absence of that trade.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 08, 2012, 08:30:06 pm
In 2012 Hamilton played a total of 132 games, with two different teams.  125 of them were played at SS.  6 times he was a DH.  One time he pinch hit.

In three seasons in the minors, every game the guy has played in the field he has played SS, except for 55 games at 2B in 2010.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=hamilt002bil

Yea, I imagine when he is being rated as a prospect (which is what we were talking about), he won't be considered as a SS.

Of course I know he has played SS the past 3 years...unlike you, I don't need baseball-reference.com to know that, though.

That's why I said "anymore". Learn the language.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 08, 2012, 08:54:03 pm
Of course I know he has played SS the past 3 years...unlike you, I don't need baseball-reference.com to know that, though.

That's why I said "anymore". Learn the language.

I didn't need a link to know it.  I offered a link to prove it.

And what the Reds will do with him NEXT year, whether they leave him at SS or go thru with their plans to move him to CF, will not alter how various prospect ratings rank him after THIS season, and that was the matter being discussed -- not where he will play next year, but ho he will be ranked as a prospect after this season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 08, 2012, 09:59:34 pm
I don't think we're having too many regrets about the Marshall trade.  As good of a reliever as Marshall is, relievers who don't get "saves" typically don't get blue chip prospects in return in trades. 

Wood may not be pitching all that great, but he's still a major league starting pitcher.  Torreyes is still a 19 year old who had his moments in Daytona.  We're pretty much getting what we expected to get out them I think.  Even Sappelt came up at the end of the year and played pretty well.

I guess put it this way, I'm not disappointed in the return we got for Marshall at this point. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on October 08, 2012, 10:24:39 pm
If Sappelt turns into the next Reed Johnson and the Cubs get 3-6 years out of him, trading Marshall was a win for the Cubs.  Anything from Wood or Torreyes would be a bonus.

As good as Marshall is (and I believe he's one of the top 5 relievers in baseball over the last 3 years), it was one year from a reliever.  Relievers just aren't that valuable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 08, 2012, 10:59:33 pm
Soler: 1-4, 3B, 2 RBI, K

Vogelbach: 1-4, RBI

Paniagua: 2-1/3 -2-1-1-1-2

http://www.thecubreporter.com/10082012/cubs-pitchers-no-match-fast-break-offense#more
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 09, 2012, 09:35:33 pm
Javy Baez homers in his first AFL at-bat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 09, 2012, 09:40:19 pm
I wonder who holds the rights to Matt Karchner.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 09, 2012, 09:44:12 pm
Tweets from Mesa's AFL game via Keith Law, Bill Mitchell and a BA intern:


Quote
keithlaw : And Javier Baez just took 94 from Chatwood out to dead center. Had to go 430+.


Quote
billazbbphotog    billazbbphotog : Javier Baez hits a 440 foot bomb to CF on his 1st AFL AB. Wow!

Quote
peter_wardell : 19 y/o Mesa SS Javier Baez (#Cubs) crushes a belt high CH 450+ ft to straightaway CF. Kids got elite bat speed // 1-0, T2
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 09, 2012, 09:50:14 pm
Ten more reports and it will top Mantle's 534 foot home run.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on October 09, 2012, 10:12:53 pm
Law listed the 10 guys he was most excited to see in the AFL for ESPN earlier today, and Baez was #1 on his list:

Quote
1. Javier Baez, SS, Chicago Cubs/Mesa

The ninth overall pick in the 2011 Rule 4 draft out of a Jacksonville, Fla., high school, Baez has huge raw power due to very quick wrists that allow him to drive the ball to all fields, but was widely seen as a candidate to move off shortstop in pro ball. Improved instruction and increased effort on his part now have that flipped around, with pro scouts who got their first looks at him this year giving him a good chance to stay at the position long-term.

The Puerto Rican-born Baez reached high Class A this year at age 19 but played less than a full season after spending April and most of May in extended spring training. The main area of his game that still needs work is patience, as his approach and his stat line have a whiff of Josh Vitters about them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 09, 2012, 10:22:32 pm
Baez hits a 2-run double in his third at-bat.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 09, 2012, 11:01:07 pm
I thought Mantle's was 565?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 09, 2012, 11:55:13 pm
Baez: 2-4, 2B, HR, 3 RBI, 2 K

Szczur: 0-2, 2 BB, Sac

Silva: 1-1

Zych: 1/3 IP, K

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_09_msswin_srrwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 10, 2012, 08:47:59 am
Javier Baez just takes 94 from Chatwood out to dead center. Had to go 430+ feet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo58QsV3bcM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo58QsV3bcM)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 10, 2012, 09:02:15 am
Thanks for the Baez HR video...WOW!   

94 mph and up a bit...took it out to RC...now that's a quick, powerful bat!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on October 10, 2012, 01:32:39 pm
crushed
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 10, 2012, 01:49:42 pm
Cubs Den is in Arizona for a few days

John Arguello ‏@CubsDen
Albert Almora has the sweetest swing here.

John Arguello ‏@CubsDen
Looks like Cubs coaches teaching Jorge Soler to use lower half. Jed Hoyer looking on.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A42--VICcAAKnY0.jpg)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A43B8WICMAAMyEb.jpg)

Soler and Vogelbach
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A43Jon7CQAEDZjV.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 10, 2012, 02:00:12 pm
Javier Baez video from the Arizona Fall League site

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20121010&content_id=39655832&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20121010&content_id=39655832&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 10, 2012, 03:23:11 pm
Andrew C (Chicago): I am not surprised Logan Watkins didn't make the list, but I would like to get what scouts and managers are saying about him. He seems to have improved this past year and even developed some power towards the end of the year. Does his defense translate to major league quality? What about his developing power?


Teddy Cahill: Cubs UTL Logan Watkins had a good season at the plate, hitting .281 with nine home runs, but he still doesn't have a home defensively. He primarily played second base in Tennessee, but also spent time at short and in the outfield. I don't think what he did this season definitively answered the questions that have dogged him as a prospect.

Andrew C (Chicago): How close was Jae-Hoon Ha to making the list, is his defense good enough for CF or is he a tweener? Does he have 15-20 HR potential?


Teddy Cahill: Cubs OF Jae-Hoon Ha has been on my radar ever since his fast start in the FSL last year. That said, he wasn't much of a factor for this list. Some opposing managers thought he had the ability to play center in the big leagues, which he'll need to do to be a regular. Otherwise, his bat will likely make him no better than a fourth outfielder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 10, 2012, 03:33:13 pm
Vogelbach has three career triples versus three career GIDP. He's stolen two bases in three attempts. So perhaps he isn't as slow as he looks. Also, I'm not aware of any natural law that says he couldn't shed a few more pounds. He was apparently up around 280 for a while in high school.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 10, 2012, 03:48:24 pm
By his own admission, Vogelbach was around 300 lbs in HS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 10, 2012, 05:46:44 pm
...Teddy Cahill: Cubs UTL Logan Watkins had a good season at the plate, hitting .281 with nine home runs, but he still doesn't have a home defensively. He primarily played second base in Tennessee, but also spent time at short and in the outfield. I don't think what he did this season definitively answered the questions that have dogged him as a prospect.

....Some opposing managers thought he (Ha) had the ability to play center in the big leagues, which he'll need to do to be a regular. Otherwise, his bat will likely make him no better than a fourth outfielder.


Both interesting, and disappointing, responses.  I've thought that the questions that "dogged" Watkins were primarily his lack of offense.  But I've thought/hoped/wished/naived that his defense was fine, or perhaps even quite excellent.  But Cahill seems to question his defense.  That's not encouraging.  To be an ideal utility guy it helps to be naturally gifted at any old defensive spot.  And there have been some wishes that Watkins might be something of a Barney with more bat.  Blah feedback on his defense isn't encouraging. 


Same for Ha.  Ron has quoted the veteran Cub coach who talked as if Ha was the best center fielder he's ever seen.  But if there isn't even uniform consensus that Ha is a true big-league defensive CFer, much less a gold-glover type, that's discouraging too. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 10, 2012, 05:50:48 pm
Yeah that was surprising about Watkins' defense.  Seems like all of the previous scouting reports suggested he was such a great athlete that he could play anywhere.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 10, 2012, 06:05:29 pm
Yeah that was surprising about Watkins' defense.  Seems like all of the previous scouting reports suggested he was such a great athlete that he could play anywhere.

Even without a real position, he might offer real value.

Guys like Mark DeRosa can actually by more valuable to a team than most starting position players, unless the starter is having a near all-star caliber season, simply because adequate, even if not good, defense and a decent bat is so much better than what a team normally gets from backup players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 10, 2012, 06:12:23 pm
Other than Cahill's, the reports I've seen on Ha's and Watkin's defense (particularly Ha's) have been favorable. The question on Ha has always been whether or not he could hit enough to be an everyday player, or if he'd be a fourth outfielder. Watkins was portrayed as an average defender or a tick above, with more questions about his bat than his glove.

I don't know who Teddy Cahill is, or what his credentials are (I'll google him), but he has very different opinions about these two prospects.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 10, 2012, 06:14:22 pm
Just because a prospect "doesn't have a home defensively" doesn't necessarily mean he isn't a good - even a great - defender.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 10, 2012, 06:27:47 pm
I give more weight to Dave McKay's assessment of Ha's defense than a first-year sportswriter who interned at BA and is now MLB's backup correspondent for the Braves. Logan Watkins has always been primarily a second baseman, and has played more games at SS than OF. Having versatility when you might wind up a bench player rather than an everyday starter makes sense to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 10, 2012, 06:47:53 pm
Same for Ha.  Ron has quoted the veteran Cub coach who talked as if Ha was the best center fielder he's ever seen.  But if there isn't even uniform consensus that Ha is a true big-league defensive CFer, much less a gold-glover type, that's discouraging too. 

Craig - I think that must have been someone else, as I have no recollection of something like that.  Or maybe senility has already begun for me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 10, 2012, 06:54:04 pm
Baez: 0-4, 2 K, 2 E

Szczur: 1-4, SB, K

Silva: 1-5, K

Struck: 1-1/3 -0-0-0-3-1



http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_10_srrwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 10, 2012, 07:04:12 pm
Jae-Hoon Ha made quite an impression on Cubs outfield coach Dave McKay in Spring Training. "I saw a guy who has a chance to be a great outfielder," McKay said of Ha, 21. "He has great speed, a great feel on the bases," McKay said of Ha, who is playing for Double-A Tennessee this year. "Sometimes you have guys who have speed and a lot of talent but they don't have that feel. The instincts aren't there and the harder they try, the more mistakes they make. [Ha] has got good instincts. "After spending a short time with him, I thought, 'Here's a guy you're going to see a lot of down the road.'


Also, Baseball America lists Ha as the Cubs' best defensive minor league outfielder and he's considered a top 20 team prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 10, 2012, 07:09:15 pm
Baez was at third today after playing short last night.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 10, 2012, 07:35:02 pm
And made two errors to match his two K's, but he failed to get his two hits. However, it was his first professional game ever at 3B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 10, 2012, 08:14:47 pm
....Also, Baseball America lists Ha as the Cubs' best defensive minor league outfielder and he's considered a top 20 team prospect.

BA has him in their top-20 for the Cubs?  That's interesting.  The system isn't that strong, so being the Cubs #19 prospect isn't necessarily that impressive.  But it's interesting, nonetheless, and it's more encouraging than being viewed outside the top 30. 

I don't really agree with the dismissal of input by these writers, though.  I don't even know who the guy is, but I assume he's a BA guy doing the usual BA thing with their top-20 lists.  He's not scouting the players, he's basically passing along input that he gets from baseball people.  Southern League is a big league.  So if the BA survey goes out to the managers and coaches for each of those teams, and there are 30 managers and coaches submitting their opinions, I don't see why those opinions should be assumed to be uninformed and worthless.  You dismiss the survey results because the guy who read through them and summarized them isn't a proven scout?  He's not making the evaluations, he's just tabulating them. 

Now I don't think every coach is a great scout.  Which, of course, may include McKay himself.  And I don't imagine every coach and manager in that league even answers.  And I certainly don't imagine they spend the same amount of time thinking and evaluating guys like Watkins and Ha who aren't close to top-20 type prospects in the league.  So I'm not sure how much feedback and how much detailed thoughtful analysis the writer is really getting about guys like Watkins and Ha. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 10, 2012, 08:28:45 pm
One problem is that the information we are getting has gone through 2, 3 or even 4 hands before we get it.   And each time it is passed on, it is probably changed somewhat.

As others have said, this is the first time I have ever heard Watkin's defense questioned.  And by the way, the guy didn't say that he was not a good defender.  What does it mean that he "doesn't have a home defensively"?  It could be because he isn't good at ANY of them.  Or it could be that he is very good at ALL of them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 10, 2012, 09:39:15 pm
According to Jim Callis in the current "Ask BA," the Cubs' preliminary pool for the 2013 Rule 4 draft is $9,822,500, based on 2012 numbers. The final number will be higher, because the slots will go up based on the increase in MLB revenue, might go up or down a bit if anyone signs a free agent subject to compensation, and may be exceeded by 5% before the penalties kick in. So the Cubs should have around $10.5 million to spend in the Rule 4 draft, and another $4.4 million or so to spent on International free agents. Good huntin', boys!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 11, 2012, 12:09:22 am
Cub Den's report from Fitch and HoHoKam

Quote
Meanwhile at the AFL game, all eyes were on Javier Baez. On opening night he hit a bomb, a double and knocked in three. But today he reminded us once again that he's just a kid. He went 0-4, only making solid contact once. In the field his debut at 3B did not go well. He commited two errors and escaped two more when he got a fortuitous bounce on a mishandled throw, then later was saved by a great scoop on a poor throw to 2b on a DP attempt.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/cubs-minor-league-recap-instructs-and-fall-league/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/cubs-minor-league-recap-instructs-and-fall-league/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 11, 2012, 12:10:05 am
John Arguello ‏@CubsDen
Baez last two ABs disappointing. Both strikeouts, swinging from his heels.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 11, 2012, 06:01:45 am
So he's officially a bust?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on October 11, 2012, 06:36:07 am
Anyone can have a bad game.  He had better do well today though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 11, 2012, 08:42:28 am
So he's officially a bust?
The Cubs already had one infielder nicknamed "McStatue".  They don't need another.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 11, 2012, 08:57:12 am
Baez is a really young guy and most young guys have some difficulty adapting.

Hopefully, he will mature and be a guy who will want to help his club any way he can.

If Baez isn't, but continues to improve and excel at the plate and at SS, I'll hope Castro can put his ego aside and adapt.   We likely won't have to deal with this issue for a couple years, if ever, so there's time for it to sort out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 11, 2012, 09:43:45 am
I don't think that Castro has an ego problem.  He has played second base before, and I would think that he would have no problem moving to second or third.

And if he has a problem with it, who cares.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 11, 2012, 10:00:29 am
Mom Castro?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 11, 2012, 06:56:46 pm
I'd like to think Castro could emotionally handle moving to 2B, if Baez could handle SS down the road.

If one of our current 3B candidates could pan out somehow, an infield also including Baez/Castro/Rizzo could be most interesting.

I'd also love to see an outfield with the speed, youth and other qualities of Jackson/Almora/Soler...though it's certainly a long shot that all 3 will become plus players at the MLB level within 2-4 years.

Of course, the real deal is pitching...who the heck knows what that might look like in 2-4 years.

It's gonna be interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 11, 2012, 07:39:49 pm
I'm less worried about Baez's errors at 3B than about his hitting and K'ing.  He's a high-whiff guy thus far.  We know that some good players whiffed like that as well.  But many of them improved as hitters.  Baez would seem to have the tools to improve as a hitter as well, and I hope he does.  But some guys don't improve that much (Corey...).  If he goes through next year as again a whiff-machine, his status will change.  Youth excuses everything and experience is expected to cure it. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 11, 2012, 07:46:59 pm
Everyone has their own definition of "whiff machine" but a 23 % whiff rate doesn't seem very machine-like to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 11, 2012, 08:05:50 pm
yes.  24% seems worse compared to <5% walk rate, and it's been inching up with every step.  it was high in instrux, it got higher in Peoria, it got higher in Daytona, and in the two games it's up some more in AFL.  Maybe it's fine. 

But for me, if he ends up being a disappointment, I think it's more likely to be because he doesn't hit enough than because he's inadequate defensively. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 11, 2012, 08:18:38 pm
Absolutely.   if Baez fails, it will almost certainly be because of a failure of his offense rather than his defense.  And most 19 year old prospects fail, regardless of their tools.  But I don't think a 24% strike out rate for a 19 year old kid in full season A ball, when  combined with a 346 OBP and a 543 slugging percentage.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 11, 2012, 10:42:16 pm
Baez: 2-5, 2B, RBI, K

Szczur: 1-4, RBI, BB

Rhee: 2-6-2-2-1-2

Zych: 1-0-0-0-0-1


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2012_10_11_msswin_surwin_1&t=g_box&sid=l119

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 11, 2012, 10:56:20 pm
Arias: 3-2-0-0-0-3


http://www.thecubreporter.com/10112012/bums-score-extra-base-hits-fitch-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 12, 2012, 12:03:44 am
Arias is pitching well...anyone have any sort of scouting report on him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 12, 2012, 08:14:10 am
I've heard he's got good velocity, low 90's.  Like anybody who typically works 90-93, has touched 95/96 on occasion, perhaps even higher?  I haven't gotten the impression of amazing life/movement, or "wow" fast.  (He apparently did not stand out enough to even draw much consideration for the Northwest League's top-20.)  Doesn't scout as currently having any especially sharp breaking stuff. 

Arias lists as tall (6'5"), and 220, turns 22 in January.   DR is crawling with scouts looking for good arms.  So it's curious that a 6'5" guy throwing low-mid-(upper?) 90's didn't begin pro ball until age 19.  Maybe he hasn't actually been pitching that long, and within a few years he'll develop a quality breaking ball that's absent now?  Guzman in Boise didn't have the breaking stuff he had later, and Samardz at 21 had very different breaking stuff than what he has now.  So if Arias can throw solid 90's with reasonable control now, and perhaps matures into a little more velocity and a lot better offspeed stuff later, who knows?  Got a chance. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 12, 2012, 09:20:25 am
Thanks for the report, Craig...let's hope.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 12, 2012, 12:41:02 pm
According to the CubsDen reporter, Arias threw fastballs, curves and a change up in the game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 12, 2012, 01:00:46 pm
Thanks, DaveP...he may be a guy worth watching...let's hope.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 12, 2012, 01:56:31 pm
Javier Baez is not starting today.  Szczur and Silva are.  I'd planned on driving up to Mesa to see the game but didn't because something came up.  Maybe next week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 12, 2012, 05:51:06 pm
Szczur: 2-5, RBI, 2 SB, K

Silva: 1-5, 3 K

Rhoderick: 1-1-1-1-0-2, HR

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_12_surwin_msswin_1

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 13, 2012, 01:10:07 am
Why is a pitcher charged with a blown save when he gives up the tying run in the fourth inning? Did they really think he was trying for 18-out save?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 13, 2012, 08:49:00 am
A pitcher is charged with a blown save any time he gives up the lead.  Probably one reason why few people take the stat seriously.

On the other hand, in most games, a reliever probably doesn't come in in the 4th inning if there is a one run lead.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 13, 2012, 09:41:38 am
If a relief pitcher can be charged with a blown save in the fourth inning, then he should qualify for a save if he pitches the rest of the game and holds the lead.  But in that case, the starter didn't go five innings so the reliever would get both a win and a save.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 13, 2012, 09:49:57 am
I don't think that many people take the blown save stat very seriously for middle relievers.  For closers, it might be a little more realistic stat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 13, 2012, 09:57:52 am
If the guy who gave up the lead in the fourth inning, has his team regain the lead in the fifth and loses the lead again, is he charged with two blown saves?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 13, 2012, 10:12:10 am
My first thought, Cactus, would be "no."  The second time he blows the save, he is the pitcher of record, in line for the "W."  Can't blow your own "W."  Of course, he's continues to be in line for the "L."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 13, 2012, 01:55:56 pm
Cubs Den's fairly extensive notes on Matt Szczur, Rubi Silva, and Kevin Rhoderick from Friday's AFL game

Quote
All 3 players look to have some legit big league ability but because none are complete ballplayers, I envision then as role players at the MLB level right now. That's not to say Szczur can't be a starter but I just don't see a star.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/cubs-fall-league-notes-1013-szczur-silva-rhoderick/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/cubs-fall-league-notes-1013-szczur-silva-rhoderick/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 13, 2012, 06:26:49 pm
Baez: 1-4, 3-Run HR, 3 RBI, K

Silva: 2-5, 2 K

Szczur: DNP

Struck: 1-1-1-1-0-2

Zych: 1-1-0-0-0-0


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_13_pddwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 13, 2012, 06:29:16 pm
Baez' homer was a monster shot to left.  Cubs Den is trying to post video.  Baez also made a strong throw from deep short.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 13, 2012, 06:30:41 pm
Wow...Baez batting 3rd and earning it with a 3-run bomb!  Zych with another scoreless inning!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 14, 2012, 04:01:32 am
Almora: 1-3, 2B, RbI

Soler: 1-3, 2B, RBI, K

Paniagua: 2-3-2-1-0-2

http://www.thecubreporter.com/10132012/almora-soler-and-baez-shine-under-arizona-sun#more
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 14, 2012, 07:40:20 am
According to Chris' article, there were some festivities to celebrate the end of the Instructional League season:

Quote
But the absolute highlight was a King Kong vs Godzilla “Home Run Derby” competition between Jorge Soler and Dan Vogelbach that completed the field activities (Soler won, with “We Are the Champions” blaring over the Fitch Park Field P. A. as he walked around the infield with arms raised in triumph). The team then adjourned to the clubhouse for a catered luncheon, followed by an “American Idol” competition between the more talented members of the team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 14, 2012, 01:38:19 pm
Cubs Fall League Recap: Javier Baez goes yard (VIDEO)

Quote
Well, on my last game here for the year, Baez came through, launching a monster blast deep into LF. It easily cleared the wall between the 340 and 390 ft signs and fell just short of clearing the second fence that marks the back end of the berm, just left of the scoreboard.

(http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/files/2012/10/Baez-HR-graphic-AZL-624x468.jpg)

Sorry, you have to go to the article and click on the video to see it.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/cubs-fall-league-recap-javier-baez-goes-yard/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/cubs-fall-league-recap-javier-baez-goes-yard/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 15, 2012, 05:15:23 pm

Szczur: 3-4, 2B, RBI, SB

Baez: 0-4, RBI, K

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_15_perwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 15, 2012, 05:16:18 pm
Instructional League is over and AzPhil has put up the cumulative stats:


http://www.thecubreporter.com/10152012/cubs-2012-arizona-instructional-league-final-stats#more
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 15, 2012, 06:33:01 pm
TREVOR GRETZKY (LF) - Age 20, L/R, 2011 Draft (7th round)
.167/.286/.167
11 GAMES (21 PA)
0 2B, 0 3B, 0 HR, 0 RBI, 3 RUNS, 3 BB, 6 K, 2 SB (0 CS), 1 PO


Ouch
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 15, 2012, 06:35:03 pm
I'm guessing he wasn't a defenseman growing up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 15, 2012, 06:45:23 pm
Former Toronto scouting director Tim Wilken was probably mostly interested in getting to hobnob with Wayne Gretzky when he made that pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 15, 2012, 07:15:09 pm
Quote
Mesa Bottom of the 1st
Matt Szczur singles on a sharp ground ball to left fielder Evan Bigley.
With Rafael Ynoa batting, Matt Szczur steals (4) 2nd base.
Rafael Ynoa singles on a soft fly ball to center fielder Zach Collier. Matt Szczur to 3rd.
Nick Castellanos walks. Rafael Ynoa to 2nd.
Jonathan Singleton called out on strikes.
Javier Baez flies into a force out, right fielder Rymer Liriano to shortstop Nick Franklin. Matt Szczur scores. Rafael Ynoa to 3rd. Nick Castellanos out at 2nd. Javier Baez to 1st.
Joc Pederson strikes out on a foul tip.


A little more of a description would be nice on that play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 15, 2012, 07:17:36 pm
Castellanos tried to tag up and advance and got thrown out at second.  Am I missing something?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 15, 2012, 07:29:46 pm
Except it sounds like Baez ended up at first.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 15, 2012, 07:49:01 pm
Oh, right.  I guess Baez's ball dropped in and Castellanos was forced at second.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 15, 2012, 07:54:36 pm
I didn't think Baez could really go down relative to his .244 OBP at Daytona, but he's doing it so far. 

I'm still hoping he can OBP at .250 or better to add value to his quick bat and power. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 15, 2012, 08:01:44 pm
Now you're being unreasonable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 15, 2012, 08:02:14 pm
He's a Cub prospect.  Ratchet down the expectations.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 16, 2012, 05:02:04 pm
Szczur: 0-4, K

Baez: 2-4, RBI, K

Rhoderick: 1-1-0-0-0-2


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_16_msswin_perwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 17, 2012, 07:32:55 pm
@BenBadler tweet: Definite big leaguer, chance for everyday role, but don't see big impact at the plate RT @charlesfiori Ben, thoughts on Matt Szczur?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 17, 2012, 11:33:03 pm
Szczur: 1-3, BB, K, SB

Baez: DNP

Rhee: 4-5-3-3-0-4

Zych: 1 IP, 1 H


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_17_msswin_scowin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 18, 2012, 10:59:48 am
Interesting Jonathan Mayo piece on Stephen Bruno, with quotes from Jason McLeod.
http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20121017&content_id=39876242&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc (http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20121017&content_id=39876242&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 18, 2012, 11:40:53 am
The Cubs trying Bruno at catcher eventually was a pretty easy call.

http://bbf.createaforum.com/general-discussion/2012-draft/msg77762/#msg77762 (http://bbf.createaforum.com/general-discussion/2012-draft/msg77762/#msg77762)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on October 18, 2012, 12:24:51 pm
Nice call, JR.  Rocky Feliciano?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 18, 2012, 03:52:03 pm
The Cubs trying Bruno at catcher eventually was a pretty easy call.

http://bbf.createaforum.com/general-discussion/2012-draft/msg77762/#msg77762 (http://bbf.createaforum.com/general-discussion/2012-draft/msg77762/#msg77762)

If he could actually serve as an acceptable 3rd string catcher, someone who might get in 10-20 games a year there, as well as offer acceptable middle infield defense, play the OF and hit remotely close to league average (an OPS+ of anything over 90) he would offer real value as a utility player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 18, 2012, 06:23:29 pm
Baez: 0-4, K, 2 E

Silva: 0-3, K

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_18_scowin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 18, 2012, 07:41:08 pm
I was at today’s very sloppily played AFL game.  On a scale of 1 - 10, the weather was an 11. Unfortunately, what wind there was caused the flight path into Sky Harbor to go right over HoHoKam.

Javier Baez had a very forgettable day. 

The first of his two errors was in the fourth inning when he fielded a routine grounder and had trouble getting it out of his glove.  Although he still had plenty of time, he rushed his throw and threw it into the dirt well in front of the first baseman.

His second error was a play I’m not sure I’ve ever seen before.  He came in to field a high hopper over the mound and then tried a behind the back flip for a force at second.  The toss wasn’t even close.  I’d be surprised if he didn’t hear about it when he got back to the dugout.

As others have said, Baez does not get cheated when he swings.  He’s close to being out of control at times.    Some hitters have a trigger mechanism that gets their swing started.  Almost like Gary Sheffield, Baez’ bat never stops moving once he gets into the batters box so if he has a trigger mechanism, I can’t imagine what it is.  That is going to have to change.

Based on what I saw in just one game, Javier Baez has a lot of work to do before we see him at Wrigley.

Lastly, I am now the proud owner of a Javier Baez foul ball.  There wasn’t much competition for it.  If the attendance really was 257, they counted the scouts, employees, and players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 19, 2012, 08:41:24 pm
Szczur: 0-5

Baez: 0-4, K

Struck: 2/3 -2-3-3-3-0

Rhoderick: 1-1-0-0-0-0



http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_19_msswin_pddwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 20, 2012, 12:09:54 am
Javier Baez was also hit by a pitch.  One tweet I saw made it sound like there was some surprise that he stayed in the game.  No further details.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 20, 2012, 06:51:19 pm
Quote from: John Arguello
Yesterday, I talked about Dan Vogelbach's "compact, uncomplicated swing".  I found this GIF made by Mike Rosenbaum of Bleacher Report that demonstrates what I mean.

As you watch the swing, notice

1.  The quick, simple load.
2.  The balanced weight transfer and the great hip rotation. He uses the lower half of his body very well.
3.  How he keeps his head down until the point of contact and ..
4.  ...the way he stays short to the ball
5.  How he  quickly whips his hands through the zone.
It's an explosive swing. There is no question this kid has the ability to hit for power and average.  Can't wait to see him at Kane County this year!

(http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/article/media_slots/photos/000/524/908/DanVogelbach_original.gif?1345746082)

Quote from: Baseball Prospectus contributor Harry Pavlidis
-  "that incredible whip through the zone is triggered by the big weight shift that starts when he's loaded up. Hands lag and EXPLODE."
-  "notice how his front foot is leading his weight shift as his back elbow is settling into the load position."
-  "if you watch that a few times you can see how perfectly his hands catch up to his hips right at impact. Squared up. Wowzers."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 20, 2012, 09:34:19 pm
Szczur: 1-4, 2 RBI, 2 BB

Baez: 1-4, HR, 3 RBI, BB, 2 E

Zych: 1-2-1-1-0-1


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_20_msswin_surwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 20, 2012, 11:57:21 pm
Baez has 8 hits and 6 errors this AFL. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 21, 2012, 11:19:36 am
If we bring Baez to the majors and he goes hitless, he should win the gold glove.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 21, 2012, 11:46:05 am
Baez has 8 hits and 6 errors this AFL. 

I believe Baez has split his time between SS and 3B.  If that's correct, I wonder how his errors are distributed between the two positions (3B not being his natural position).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 21, 2012, 12:45:09 pm
He had two errors in his first game at third base.  I don't know about the rest.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 21, 2012, 08:45:19 pm
He's has two two-error games at SS and one in his only game at 3B. Otherwise, he's been perfect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 21, 2012, 08:49:07 pm
LMAO
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on October 21, 2012, 11:22:36 pm
If Barney were to be included in a trade this offseason, would Wakins be ready to give it a go at the major league level this year, or does he need some more time in the minors?  I know he's been talked about on here, and as a guy who's numbers have improved as he's climbed the organizational ladder, he's definitely an intriguing guy. 

If some team would accept Barney as a piece for a decent pitcher, I'd be all for signing a stopgap guy at second and letting Watkins earn his way up.  If he's going to be a part of the team we hope is competitive in 2015, he needs to start getting some starting experience in the big's in 2013....say after super 2 status time passes.  I realize he most likely won't be a guy we have to worry about with that, but nothing wrong with planning ahead, and it would be nice if he was.  Plus, it wouldn't hurt for him to get some time in AAA next year.

He just feels like a Cardinals type guy to me where we always wonder where they come from...someone who isn't really super heralded, but produces(ops of .805 last year with power and walk rate growing every year) and is heady.

I know I ramble, but oh well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 22, 2012, 12:17:30 am
I expect Watkins will be in Iowa at least until the trade deadline. If Barney is still a Cub then, I'd expect Watkins would stay in Iowa until September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 22, 2012, 08:05:21 am
Logan Watkins still has more than plenty to prove in Iowa before being considered for an every day job in the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 22, 2012, 08:54:13 am
Logan Watkins still has more than plenty to prove in Iowa before being considered for an every day job in the majors.

Certainly he does, but his progress is encouraging.

He had an OPS of .689 in A ball at age 20 in 2010; .756 in A+ at age 21; and .805 at age 22 in AA this year.  That is nice, steady progress.  Not something that should make anyone think he should be in the majors early in 2013, but still nice progress.

If he shows the same kind of improvement in 2013 at Iowa, then it might be easy to imagine him getting a September call up in 2013 and getting quite a bit of play at the end of another season where the W/L record won't matter.  And if a contending team has a defensive hole at 2B in mid-July of next year and would be willing to overpay with young pitching talent, Watkins might even get playing time a bit earlier than September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on October 22, 2012, 10:12:53 am
It seems I recall at the deadline, some espn guys reported Barney as being well thought of in some circles around the league.  If true, I could see him being dealt in a deal (most likely package for a pitcher) while there's a good chance his value is at it's highest.  If that were the case, and Watkins showed as much improvement as he has showed at every other stop, i'd like to see him called up around June assuming he isn't head and shoulders the best guy in spring training.  My reasoning is at a certain experience level, it becomes advantageous to go ahead and fail at the major league level if that failure is inevitable, so the player can go back to AAA and fix what ails him, ala Rizzo....that is, assuming the club has a strong player development system, which I believe the Cubs either now have, or are very close to having.

This makes sense to me, but I suppose that doesn't mean it makes sense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 22, 2012, 10:35:44 am
It seems I recall at the deadline, some espn guys reported Barney as being well thought of in some circles around the league.  If true, I could see him being dealt in a deal (most likely package for a pitcher) while there's a good chance his value is at it's highest.  If that were the case, and Watkins showed as much improvement as he has showed at every other stop, i'd like to see him called up around June assuming he isn't head and shoulders the best guy in spring training.  My reasoning is at a certain experience level, it becomes advantageous to go ahead and fail at the major league level if that failure is inevitable, so the player can go back to AAA and fix what ails him, ala Rizzo....that is, assuming the club has a strong player development system, which I believe the Cubs either now have, or are very close to having.

It depends entirely on the player, his strengths and weaknesses, his psychological makeup, how coachable he is and what he still needs to work on.

If it is a Brett Jackson, who appeared to have plateued in the minors and who apparently needed to fail miserably before he was really going to be open to completely restructuring his swing and perhaps even his approach at the plate, as well as focusing on specific development tasks, then bringing the guy up and letting him fail miserably may be best.

But Watkins has improved quite steadily in the minors, and there would seem to be no particular value in bringing him up to fail in order to send him back down, effectively losing a fair amount of development time when he is in the majors and failing there and learning next to nothing when that failure is likely to cause him to become defensive.

I have no problem with putting young, developing players/prospects in the majors and playing them nearly every day and having the team suffer with the growing pains if the developmental needs and psychological makeup of the player make that likely to be the more effective way of getting him to reach his potential, and determining how likely he is to do so.

But for many other players that simply is not the case and they need to go thru the normal, orderly progression thru the minors, being promoted from one level to the next only after they turn in a strong, if not dominating performance at each level.

Unlike with the Hendry regime, I have considerable confidence in the ability of the current regime to generally make good decisions on how to handle prospect promotions and how to teach them what is needed along the way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 22, 2012, 11:13:44 am
Cubs Draft Report Card:

POSITION PLAYERS

Best Pure Hitter: OF Albert Almora (1) has a quick bat and repeatedly makes line-drive contact with ease. The Cubs had their eyes opened by the bats of three lower draft picks—INF Stephen Bruno (7), SS/3B Tim Saunders (32) and 3B Ben Carhart (35).

Best Power Hitter: Power might be the least obvious of Almora's tools, but he has the hitting prowess to produce 20 homers annually once he gets stronger. 1B Jacob Rogers (40) has the most strength in this draft crop.

Fastest Runner: OF Rashad Crawford (11) has plus-plus speed that also served him well on the basketball court. An above-average runner, Saunders stole 17 bases in 49 pro games.

Best Defensive Player: Almora has impressive tools and even better instincts, and he has all the ingredients to be a Gold Glove center fielder. C Chadd Krist (9) is a solid defender.

PITCHERS

Best Fastball: RHP Duane Underwood's (2) velocity fluctuates, but at his best he can get to 98 mph. RHP Pierce Johnson (1s) has more consistent velocity, sitting at 92-94 mph and peaking at 96. RHP Josh Conway (4) maxed out at 96 mph before having Tommy John surgery during the spring while still at Coastal Carolina.

Best Secondary Pitch: Johnson's hard curveball gives him a second strikeout pitch. RHP Paul Blackburn (1s), who has the best overall feel for pitching among Cubs draftees, has the makings of a plus curve as well.

ODDS AND ENDS

Best Pro Debut: Bruno led the short-season Northwest League in batting (.361), hits (91) and on-base percentage (.442). Saunders outhit him while reaching high Class A, batting a combined .381/.431/.536 between three stops.

Best Athlete: Crawford is the most explosive athlete, as YouTube clips of him dunking from the foul line will attest. Almora is the best baseball athlete, with the chance to have solid or better tools across the board.

Most Intriguing Background: 3B Rustin Sveum's (39) father Dale manages the Cubs and played in the big leagues for 12 seasons. Sveum didn't sign and may play both ways at Dixie State (Utah).

Closest To The Majors: Johnson, who could start his first full pro season in high Class A. Almora's instincts make him a good bet to be the first prep position player from the entire draft class to get to the big leagues.

Best Late-Round Pick: Saunders, the 2012 NCAA Division III College World Series MVP in June, has versatility to go with his plus bat and wheels. LHP Nathan Dorris (17) has the makings of a solid fastball and above-average curveball.

The One Who Got Away: Chicago never got close to landing OF Rhett Wiseman (25), a quality athlete with a raw bat who could have gone in the top three rounds if he could have been signed away from Vanderbilt. The Cubs thought they had a deal with LHP Jake Drossner (23) but ultimately lost him to Maryland.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on October 22, 2012, 11:32:58 am
Otani may be out of Cubs reach, but could open the door for others
Quote

That team probably won't be the Cubs.  It's not that they wouldn't want that kind of arm in their system.  It's a simple case of mathematics.  The Cubs have spent $1.1M on Juan Carlos Paniagua and $700,000 on SS Frandy De La Rosa.  That is $1.8M worth of cap space that we know has been spent.  At best it leaves the Cubs with $1.1M left.


http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/otani-may-be-out-of-cubs-reach-but-could-open-the-door-for-others/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/otani-may-be-out-of-cubs-reach-but-could-open-the-door-for-others/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 22, 2012, 12:08:22 pm
It seems I recall at the deadline, some espn guys reported Barney as being well thought of in some circles around the league.  If true, I could see him being dealt in a deal (most likely package for a pitcher) while there's a good chance his value is at it's highest.

Me thinks the Cubs' brain trust thinks more highly of Barney than you do.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 22, 2012, 12:27:17 pm
Me thinks the Cubs' brain trust thinks more highly of Barney than you do.

I'm also wondering if we're starting to see some inflated hopes for Logan Watkins because he isn't Darwin Barney.  Watkins had a nice year in Double-A, but he still has far from proven that he's on his way to being a better all-around major league player than Barney, regardless of how you value Barney's defense.

Watkins has improved a lot as a hitter the last year and a half, but I still don't see anything that distinguishes him from the likes of Chad Meyers or Bobby Hill yet, other than perhaps better defense and versatility (and that might also be in question after reading BA's Southern League wrapup).  Right now, he's just another pretty decent infield prospect who's worth keeping an eye on and probably worth re-evaluating once you see what he does against Triple-A pitching.  He's not quite solidified himself as a good Barney replacement at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on October 22, 2012, 01:01:19 pm
It depends entirely on the player, his strengths and weaknesses, his psychological makeup, how coachable he is and what he still needs to work on.

If it is a Brett Jackson, who appeared to have plateued in the minors and who apparently needed to fail miserably before he was really going to be open to completely restructuring his swing and perhaps even his approach at the plate, as well as focusing on specific development tasks, then bringing the guy up and letting him fail miserably may be best.

But Watkins has improved quite steadily in the minors, and there would seem to be no particular value in bringing him up to fail in order to send him back down, effectively losing a fair amount of development time when he is in the majors and failing there and learning next to nothing when that failure is likely to cause him to become defensive.

I have no problem with putting young, developing players/prospects in the majors and playing them nearly every day and having the team suffer with the growing pains if the developmental needs and psychological makeup of the player make that likely to be the more effective way of getting him to reach his potential, and determining how likely he is to do so.

But for many other players that simply is not the case and they need to go thru the normal, orderly progression thru the minors, being promoted from one level to the next only after they turn in a strong, if not dominating performance at each level.

Unlike with the Hendry regime, I have considerable confidence in the ability of the current regime to generally make good decisions on how to handle prospect promotions and how to teach them what is needed along the way.

I'm not sure we(or the Cubs tho they are in a better position than we are) can really make that call one way or the other right now.

Do you really want to wait for every legitimate position player prospect to plateau before you bring them to the majors to help them see the adjustments they need to make and why?  And, perhaps, I should have worded it different.  I'd rather Watkins not fail tho I implied otherwise and that was wrong.  I'd like him to succeed, but if in June he is >800 ops in AAA and Barney is gone, you might as well bring him up and let him sink or swim.  If he swims, awesome.  if he sinks, he has something to work on in AAA and/or the offseason rather than just dominating while learning little and he has a better understanding as to why rather than a vague "do it this way cuz I said so".  While the latter will work, the former is more instructive and it's not like we'll be playing for anything in 2013.  And if not June, then July is fine...it's the basic premise, not some particular set of rigid details.. 

I take Watson as a plus make-up guy which is why i would be less worried about him failing his first try in the big's.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 22, 2012, 03:55:54 pm
Do you really want to wait for every legitimate position player prospect to plateau before you bring them to the majors to help them see the adjustments they need to make and why?  And, perhaps, I should have worded it different.  I'd rather Watkins not fail tho I implied otherwise and that was wrong.  I'd like him to succeed, but if in June he is >800 ops in AAA and Barney is gone, you might as well bring him up and let him sink or swim.  If he swims, awesome.  if he sinks, he has something to work on in AAA and/or the offseason rather than just dominating while learning little and he has a better understanding as to why rather than a vague "do it this way cuz I said so".  While the latter will work, the former is more instructive and it's not like we'll be playing for anything in 2013.

You are right that we won't be playing for anything in 2013, and the decisions need to be made based on what is best for the development of the player, or for creating value.

If Barney is traded in June, it would be rather surprising, but if he were, and the Cubs think Watkins can learn as well in Wrigley Field as he can in Iowa, then, sure, bring him up, but for most players there is a reason AAA exists, and that is players can learn and develop there.  And if Watkins' OPS is less than .800, don't you think it would sort of depend on how much below .800 it was?

All I am saying is that 2013 needs to be another development year, and Watkins, and most prospects with any serious chance of contributing in the majors, needs to be played and assigned in order to maximize that development.  For most non-star prospects, that includes a full year in AAA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on October 22, 2012, 06:46:13 pm
That's a shame about Otani, who has a chance to be special.  Another blow to Theo's original plan to reshape the organization as a result of the change in the CBA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 22, 2012, 10:03:38 pm
The change in the CBA will make it a great deal more difficult and drag the process out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 23, 2012, 01:12:14 am
Szczur: 2-5, RBI, 2 SB, K

Baez: 1-5, K, E

Struck: 1-1-0-0-0-0

Rhoderick: 1-0-0-0-1-2


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_22_msswin_srrwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on October 23, 2012, 01:50:50 pm
The change in the CBA will make it a great deal more difficult and drag the process out.

It can stil be done though.  Cubs have plenty of salary room without the ability to compete.  Why not just turn that salary into long term controllable assets by letting teams pay you in young players to take that salary off their hands? 

What would a team deep in prospects such as the Rangers be willing to give up to unload Michael Young's 13 million 2013 contract?  In a dream world, it would be Olt(not even going to dream about profar) and maybe send back Villaneuva; in the real world, i'm not sure, but something valuable.  Figured a team like the Rangers would be ideal(trying to win now and deep farm) but they didn't really have any bad contracts worth paying a premium prospect to unload.  Young's was about the worst.

What would the Giants part with to save the 27 million owed to Zito?  Better yet, what would the Angels part with to save the 42 million left on the last 2 years of Vernon Well's contract?

This seems no different than giving guys big bonuses, except, while the dollars are bigger, the prospects are also closer to being major league ready.  Another way to look at it is we are investing 2013 and 2014 dollars to acquire guys who will be cost controlled and arb-elegible thru 2018 or whenever.  It makes our team stronger when we are ready to compete because we'll have cheaper players in place of probable free agents(acquired for 2013-2014 dollars).  It would help allow the future Cubs team to upgrade else where or sign a super star that can carry us in the playoffs rather than employing the spread it around philosophy past mediocre Cubs teams have been such a proponent of doing.

Would "win now" teams consider trading packaging bad contracts and good prospects?  Or, are good prospects too coveted to consider letting the Cubs eat an under-performing guys money?  I'm not talking about the Trouts/Harper/Strasbergs of the world prospect-wise, but pitchers who project as at least a #3 starter and preferably #2, or position players who, while might not be perennial all-stars, have the chance to be above average contributors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 23, 2012, 01:58:16 pm
I suppose you could do one of those Bobby Bonilla deals...you know, $1M a year for 50 years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 23, 2012, 03:44:38 pm
Young and Zito have 5-10 rights.  Guys like that probably are not too keen on being part of that strategy when the acquiring club will be a non-contender for a time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 23, 2012, 03:46:35 pm
Also the long term value on a premium prospect like Mike Olt is worth a lot more than the $13 million salary for a guy like Young.  The Rangers wouldn't consider a trade like that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 23, 2012, 04:00:34 pm
Pretty much what the Rangers, Giants, and Angels might give up to get rid of their $13 million, $27 million, or $42 million black holes is going to be worth roughly $13 million, $27 million, or $42 million or less than that.

Premium, can't miss prospects are worth a lot more than that because of the cost savings over their first few seasons, so you won't get anyone like that back. 

If you get some B or C grade guys, well is it really worth $27 million or $42 million to pick up a package of prospects like Arismendy Alcantara, Logan Watkins, and Trey Martin?  There's a reason why teams don't pay 2nd or 3rd round value draft picks $42 million or $27 million.  Those players aren't worth that kind of money.  We might be in rebuild mode and money might not be an object to us right now, but I still don't think we really want to be essentially paying $27-42 million to pick up a handful of B or C grade guys.

Kind of an interesting idea, but there's a reason why you don't see trades like that being made.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on October 23, 2012, 04:36:25 pm
Young and Zito have 5-10 rights.  Guys like that probably are not too keen on being part of that strategy when the acquiring club will be a non-contender for a time.

Young and Zito were just a couple players off the top of my head...any guy  that doesn't have 5 and 10 rights will do.

Also the long term value on a premium prospect like Mike Olt is worth a lot more than the $13 million salary for a guy like Young.  The Rangers wouldn't consider a trade like that.

Yeah,  Your right, Olt was a pipe dream and said as much in my post...I was just giving an example that was easy to identify.  Take on salary...give good prospect further away from majors for a better one closer to it.  They have no need of Olt for a couple of years anyway unless he's a dh or moved to another position.

Pretty much what the Rangers, Giants, and Angels might give up to get rid of their $13 million, $27 million, or $42 million black holes is going to be worth roughly $13 million, $27 million, or $42 million or less than that.

Premium, can't miss prospects are worth a lot more than that because of the cost savings over their first few seasons, so you won't get anyone like that back. 

If you get some B or C grade guys, well is it really worth $27 million or $42 million to pick up a package of prospects like Arismendy Alcantara, Logan Watkins, and Trey Martin?  There's a reason why teams don't pay 2nd or 3rd round value draft picks $42 million or $27 million.  Those players aren't worth that kind of money.  We might be in rebuild mode and money might not be an object to us right now, but I still don't think we really want to be essentially paying $27-42 million to pick up a handful of B or C grade guys.

Kind of an interesting idea, but there's a reason why you don't see trades like that being made.

The thing about "premium can't miss prospects" is even "premium can't miss prospects" sometimes miss, so it would be a calculated risk for the trading partner, too.  If my window to win the world series is in the next couple of years and I have a guy like Zito(or whoever...the particular player is irrelevant) hamstringing my ability to sign that perennial all-star level player at a position of need in free agency, my desire to fill that hole is going to be immense.  I could see a team willing to trade 50 million in salary relief over a couple of years(of course, it would be nice for the Cubs if the player at least had a positive war and could contribute in some way) for a "close to major league ready" potential #2 starter and a lesser prospect from a team that already has solid starting pitching.  For another team, they may be strong at 3b, or 2b, but I'd rather starting pitching because there is such dearth of it at the upper levels.  It would have to be the right deal for both sides, but I could see this type of trade eventually being made. 

This thinking may be a little too far out there and I may be slightly crazy, but some outside the box thinking is what's needed in some areas this off-season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 23, 2012, 05:42:53 pm
It can stil be done though.  Cubs have plenty of salary room without the ability to compete.  Why not just turn that salary into long term controllable assets by letting teams pay you in young players to take that salary off their hands? 

I suspect that you will see that this winter. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 23, 2012, 05:46:22 pm
Kind of an interesting idea, but there's a reason why you don't see trades like that being made.

No doubt there is a reason, and for the most part it is that the new CBA restrictions have only made such moves more attractive in the last few months.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 23, 2012, 05:54:29 pm
Your right, Olt was a pipe dream and said as much in my post...I was just giving an example that was easy to identify.  Take on salary...give good prospect further away from majors for a better one closer to it.  They have no need of Olt for a couple of years anyway unless he's a dh or moved to another position.

You will also likely see another variation of this in teams signing a quality FA to a multi-year contract, and then flipping him in the middle of the following year, with the agreement to pay the bulk of his remaining salary, even when he is still performing at a high level and the contract does not appear to be an albatross.  Much in the same line as what the Cubs did with Paul Maholm, only with recognized, high quality FA who are signed to multi-year deals.

The thing about "premium can't miss prospects" is even "premium can't miss prospects" sometimes miss, so it would be a calculated risk for the trading partner, too.  If my window to win the world series is in the next couple of years and I have a guy like Zito(or whoever...the particular player is irrelevant) hamstringing my ability to sign that perennial all-star level player at a position of need in free agency, my desire to fill that hole is going to be immense.  I could see a team willing to trade 50 million in salary relief over a couple of years(of course, it would be nice for the Cubs if the player at least had a positive war and could contribute in some way) for a "close to major league ready" potential #2 starter and a lesser prospect from a team that already has solid starting pitching.  For another team, they may be strong at 3b, or 2b, but I'd rather starting pitching because there is such dearth of it at the upper levels.  It would have to be the right deal for both sides, but I could see this type of trade eventually being made. 

Recognition of when a window of opportunity opens, or is LIKELY to open, and how long it will stay open, is key to evaluating the value a player might offer to a team, and it has been at the heart of many of the trades I have said would make sense (such as Lee after his great season).  Not too many other folks here seem to agree with that approach, though I suspect the Theocracy does.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 23, 2012, 06:34:50 pm
Baez: 1-5, RBI, 2 E - (3B)

Rhee: 3-2/3 -6-2-2-0-0

Zych: 1-2/3 -3-0-0-0-0

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_23_msswin_pddwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on October 23, 2012, 09:56:30 pm
Javy has struggled lately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on October 24, 2012, 12:00:45 pm
I think he's been reading about how Craig has questioned his plate discipline.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 24, 2012, 12:21:49 pm
Craig destroyed poor Nic Jackson.  Not he is going after Baez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 24, 2012, 01:41:13 pm
Get off his case, you guys.  He's got at least one if not two more hits than errors this AFL!  And when you're one of the best prospects in baseball and the best in the Cubs system, who needs a .250 OBP?  He'll get better later on, anyways. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on October 24, 2012, 01:47:40 pm
Vicious, man.  Some people don't recognize it because it's dry way past snarky, but we know what you're doing.  When he flames out, I'm blaming you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 24, 2012, 01:53:33 pm
Craig is the anti-Oneri
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 24, 2012, 03:43:26 pm
Craig is Oneri's aunty?  That explains a lot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 24, 2012, 06:47:45 pm
Szczur: 1-4, BB

Silva: 1-4, K

Baez: DNP

Struck: 2-0-0-0-0-3

Rhoderick: 1-2-3-3-1-1


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_24_scowin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 24, 2012, 07:13:23 pm
Szczur's steal rate continues to improve.

Boise in 2010 -- 1 SB in 18 games, no CS.
Peoria in 2011 -- 17/5 in 66 games, 7/0 in 43 Daytona games.
Daytona in 2012 -- 38/12 in 78 games; Tennessee -- 4/2 in 35 games; AFL 6/1 in 11 games.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 24, 2012, 09:08:09 pm
Or gone down each season...whatever...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 25, 2012, 08:57:10 am
Quote from: Theo Epstein
"If there was one thing that I was surprised by in a negative way it was how pervasive the lack of plate discipline was in the whole organization, at the major-league level, upper minors, lower minors, draft decision making and protocol. It’s just something that has not been a factor for a long time, and we’re paying the price for that."

Obviously when you see a quote like that, it's pretty easy to why there were wholesale changes in our minor league and draft operations at the end of the year. 

And again with Tim Wilken, while I don't doubt Theo when he says he has a great deal of respect for Wilken and feels his experience is a valuable thing to have in the organization, he obviously didn't think Wilken was the right guy to be running the draft anymore either.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 25, 2012, 11:50:03 am
And again with Tim Wilken, while I don't doubt Theo when he says he has a great deal of respect for Wilken and feels his experience is a valuable thing to have in the organization, he obviously didn't think Wilken was the right guy to be running the draft anymore either.

I think you may be undervaluing Wilken far too much, and also projecting on the Theocracy that same undervaluation.

If Theo had real concerns about Wilken's judgment and talent evaluation, he would almost certainly be gone now.  The comment you quoted indicates that Theo believes Wilken was putting too little weight on plate discipline or control in determining the value of a prospect, but that is something which can be adjusted or corrected.  I don't think it is clear that Wilken is not the individual most responsible for "running the draft" for the Cubs, though it is clear from prior comments from the Theocracy that the first few picks are going to be more of a "groupthink" process than they will any longer be made individually, whether by Wilken or anyone else.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 25, 2012, 12:25:54 pm
JR, in many years you saw Wilken reaching for pitching: Pawlewek (sp) and Simpson, for example.  Maybe he did that because he didn't like the hitters he was being prodded to take.  What was Vitters plate discipline?  I don't remember.  Anyway, it may not be as much an indictment of Wilkens as to those to whom he had to answer.

I also would think that maybe now Wilken has pledged allegiance to the flag and the Cubs Way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 25, 2012, 12:26:46 pm
Wasn't Vitters Wilken's first draft?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on October 25, 2012, 12:32:33 pm
I believe so.  That's why I wondered what his hs discipline was like.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 25, 2012, 12:36:34 pm
Colvin was his first pick, Pawelek was the year before Wilken got here.  Vitters profile hasn't changed much.  He wasn't patient, but didn't K much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 25, 2012, 03:16:17 pm
Cubs Den has an interesting assessment of Cub minor league outfielders.
http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/cubs-prospects-the-outfielders/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2012/10/cubs-prospects-the-outfielders/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 25, 2012, 06:36:21 pm
Baez: 1-3, HR, RBI, BB, 2 SB

Szczur: 0-4

Silva: 0-4, K


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_25_perwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 25, 2012, 06:50:09 pm
Why does Mesa's manager keep batting Rafeal Ynoa ninth, when he's hitting .357 and most of his teammates are under .250?
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 25, 2012, 09:37:37 pm
Cubs Den is terrific!  Arguello provides excellent information and analysis.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 26, 2012, 10:14:42 am
Baez has far more trade value as a SS than a 3B.  I doubt the Cubs trade him, but it makes no sense to decrease his trade value until he proves he can't handle SS.  Plus the transition from SS to 3B/2B isn't that big of a deal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 26, 2012, 10:16:58 am
Is there a secret way to get to the Baez article?  I keep getting pages asking me to subscribe, and when I close them, I can't get to the article.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on October 26, 2012, 10:19:22 am
If you can play SS, you can play 3B.

I thought Valbuena was fantastic this year defensively, and he's a 2Bman playing 3B...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 26, 2012, 10:24:44 am
I wonder how long it takes a good, instinctive, hard-working, athletic infielder to learn a new position?  I'd think the move from SS to 3rd would be much easier than SS to 2B.  3B I think is by far the simplest position to learn.  Catch the ball, throw the ball.  Skills/experience-wise, how to play the bunt is probably the one unique thing that is qualitatively different than what a SS does.  Having the quicknesses, reflexes, and hands to play it well, different story, but I doubt it takes super long to learn what's teachable.  Obviously lots of practice throwing the ball needed.  2B I think is quite a bit different.  The footwork for the DP is very different.  Maybe the DP toss isn't much different.  But the angle on the pitches and ball-off-bat is quite different, and the throwing is a lot different.  The DP throw or throwing after stabbing a ball up the middle is quite different than the plant-and-throw-with-weight-towards-target that a 3B so often throws.  I think that would require a lot more time and teaching and experience and repetitions to master. 

I wonder between 2B and 3B where Baez's skill-set would be more valuable.  He's got the cannon for 3B, and supposedly the quick-twitch response quickness that a 3B needs for the hard-hit balls.  (A tool not acquired via practice, really...)  On the other hand, his range and athletic quickness and coordination would seem to serve him very well at 2B.  Turning a DP seems a very athleticism-demanding operation, for example, so a guy with Baez's coordination might be super-ideal.  His Peoria reputation was also as a really good hustler, backing plays up, getting way out for relays, etc..  All of that kind of stuff would seem much more useful at 2B than at 3B.  Probably easier to stay mentally involved at 2B as well. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 26, 2012, 10:40:19 am
Good points, Craig.
 
My best guess is that Cubs would want Baez at 3B (if not SS) due to:
1) the cannon he has would be great at 3B;
2) less wear and tear at 3B than at 2B; and
3) his hit tool (assuming he continues to develop) can be maximized at 3B due to less wear and tear.

Of course, the issue will likely turn on whether we're more set at 2B than 3B (or SS) when Baez appears ready.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 26, 2012, 10:55:31 am
If Baez could play 2nd base and 3rd base equally well, I would perfer him at 2nd base.  Having a good fielding second baseman with monster offense is more valuable than having a third baseman with monster offense.

Put another way, it is probably easier to find a third baseman with monster offense than to find a second baseman with similar offense.

Ryne Sandberg got a gold glove at third base, but if the Cubs had kept him there, he would have probably had a more difficult time making the HOF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on October 26, 2012, 11:00:31 am
But they have Barney penciled in at second.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on October 26, 2012, 11:01:47 am
I agree with you in principle, Dave.  I wonder whether there might be concerns about Baez' agility as he fills out.  If so, this would suggest that he would be better suited to 3B down the road.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 26, 2012, 11:05:47 am
Agree with Dave, I like the notion of Baez at 2B, and his power would seem to stand out more there.  (Barney, Watkins, Torreyes, Amaya, and deLaRosa don't look like big power prospects.) 

But, we do have some number of other interesting 2B prospects.

The real issue isn't going to be 2B or 3B for Baez.  If he ends up with "monster offense", he'll be great at either spot.  The real question is whether he'll be able to hit. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 26, 2012, 12:09:17 pm
The Bruce Miles blog entry that Reb posted the other day had some mildly interesting notes about promotions in the amateur scouting staff.

Quote
--Lukas McKnight, assistant director of amateur scouting. For McKnight, this is a promotion from regional cross-checker.

If you look on the Cubs front office roster, I think this promotion makes McKnight the clear #2 guy to Jaron Madison in the amateur scouting department, which is the first time the Cubs have had that I think.  Wilken, Stockstill, and Hendry didn't really have a clear #2 right hand guy when they were running the scouting department.  That's a pretty big promotion for McKnight moving up that high from regional cross-checker, I imagine. 

Also considering some of the comments Theo made about a lack of plate discipline being pervasive throughout amateur scouting and minor league development, it's kind of interesting that a longtime Fleita/Wilken guy like McKnight (who played, managed, and scouted in the Fleita/Wilken minor league system) will be playing such a big role in the scouting department.  I guess it goes to show that the Theocracy spent this year trying to identify some of the good people left over from the Hendry regime.

Quote
International Scouting

- Louie Eljaua, Special Assistant to the General Manager/Director of International Scouting.

- Alex Suarez, Assistant Director of Player Development/International Scouting.

- David Macias, Player Development/International Scouting Assistant.

- Paul Weaver, International Scouting crosschecker, coordinator of Pacific Rim Scouting.

Jose Serra has been promoted to Director of Dominican Operations.

From here, it sounds like some chairs got shuffled in international scouting, but most of the same people are still around. 

Louie Eljaua is someone who started out with Theo in Boston but was brought into the Cubs organization by Hendry, so he's pretty much come full circle with the Theocracy.  I'm guessing with his job title that he's now heading our international scouting?  I can't tell if "Special Assistant to the General Manager/Director of International Scouting" just means he's a special assistant to the Director of International scouting or if Director of International Scouting is now his responsibility.

Paul Weaver and Jose Serra are obviously Hendry holdovers.  I can't tell if Weaver got demoted or not, but it looks that way.  He's still listed on the Front Office roster as "Director, International Scouting" (pretty much the equivalent title that Tim Wilken had in amateur scouting), but "international scouting cross-checker, coordinator of Pacific Rim scouting" sounds like a demotion.  If that's the case, it leads to a little more credence to the idea that Eljaua is now heading up international scouting.

Also David Macias was one of our draft picks out of Vanderbilt in 2009.  Glad to see the Cubs talked him into joining our scouting department.  Seems like he ought to be a really good guy to have there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 26, 2012, 12:49:01 pm
Actually it looks like the Sun-Times did a pretty good job listing the Cubs' new scouting and player development hierarchy.

Quote
Here’s the structure of the Cubs player development and scouting departments:

Player Development


- Brandon Hyde, Director of Player Development.

- Tim Cossins, Field Coordinator. Cossins joins the Cubs from the Marlins organization.

- Alex Suarez, Assistant Director of Player Development/International Scouting. For Suarez, this is a promotion from coordinator of player development/international scouting.

- David Macias, Player Development/International Scouting Assistant. Macias was an outfielder in the Cubs minor league system from 2008-11.

Amateur Scouting

- Jaron Madison, Director of Amateur Scouting.

- Lukas McKnight, Assistant Director of Amateur Scouting. For McKnight, this is a promotion from regional crosschecker.

- Shane Farrell, Amateur Scouting Assistant. Farrell pitched for Marshall University from 2008-11 and scouted the Cape Cod League last summer.

Additionally, the Cubs have hired Chris Clemons, JP Davis and Alex Lontayo as new area scouts, while Mark Adair is now a regional crosschecker after previously serving as a pro scout.

International Scouting

- Louie Eljaua, Special Assistant to the General Manager/Director of International Scouting.

- Alex Suarez, Assistant Director of Player Development/International Scouting.

- David Macias, Player Development/International Scouting Assistant.

- Paul Weaver, International Scouting crosschecker, coordinator of Pacific Rim Scouting.

Pro Scouting

- Joe Bohringer, Director of Pro Scouting.

- Andrew Bassett, Pro Scouting Coordinator. For Bassett, this is a promotion from baseball operations assistant.

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/15920254-573/cubs-announce-coaches-organizational-moves.html (http://www.suntimes.com/sports/15920254-573/cubs-announce-coaches-organizational-moves.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 26, 2012, 01:25:46 pm
JR, just to clarify for some of our younger browsers, the Suntimes chart regards guys with new or revised titles.  There are a lot of amateur scouts and pro scouts who are not listed there, because they didn't have a revised assignment or title. 

JR, do you have access to the Cubs full scouting chart somewhere?  For a year or two Steve Wilson was signing Koreans and a couple of Chinese right and left.  And some Australians too.  There was talk about the brilliance of the Cubs establishing a niche in Korea.  But then suddenly that all stopped.  Since the year we signed Ha and all those guys, I think the next year we signed one million dollar pitcher (who hasn't done anything), and it's been nothing since. 

I wonder if Steve Wilson is still a full-time guy?  Or if he quit, or got hired elsewhere, or got fired, or something? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 26, 2012, 01:42:00 pm
Quote
JR, just to clarify for some of our younger browsers, the Suntimes chart regards guys with new or revised titles.  There are a lot of amateur scouts and pro scouts who are not listed there, because they didn't have a revised assignment or title. 

craig, I believe that Sun-Times list includes the top 2 or 3 guys in each of those departments.  It's not just people with new titles.  Brandon Hyde and Jaron Madison have had their titles for a little while now, for example.  Most of the guys getting new titles are taking on the #2 or #3 spots in those departments it seems.   

But you're right, it doesn't include all of the scouts who are underneath the directors in those departments.  I really don't have any idea who are all of the scouts in our scouting departments, although probably some digging through the Cubs media guide and the front office roster might help in putting together a comprehensive list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 26, 2012, 01:44:12 pm
And it looks like Steve Wilson is still in the organization.  Carrie Muskat had this reference for Wilson in September.

Quote
Congrats to Jesse Hodges (@TCHodgy), who hit his first professional home run, a two-run shot, in Monday’s instructional league game against the Athletics. The Cubs signed Hodges after seeing him play in the World Junior Tournament in South Korea. A Canadian, he had a full scholarship at Grayson College, a junior college in Texas. His home run was well-timed as he connected in front of Cubs international scout Steve Wilson, who signed the infielder, as well as Hodges’ grandfather, who was at the game, and most of the Cubs brass, including Theo Epstein. I’ll have more on Hodges.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 26, 2012, 01:56:18 pm
If Baez could play 2nd base and 3rd base equally well, I would perfer him at 2nd base.  Having a good fielding second baseman with monster offense is more valuable than having a third baseman with monster offense.

Put another way, it is probably easier to find a third baseman with monster offense than to find a second baseman with similar offense.

Ryne Sandberg got a gold glove at third base, but if the Cubs had kept him there, he would have probably had a more difficult time making the HOF.

Also concur on Baez at 2B rather than 3B.  But, as Craig notes, 2B  probably would be a tougher learning curve.

By the way, Sandberg never won a gold glove at 3B.  Mike Schmidt won the 3B gold glove in the season that Sandberg played 3B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 26, 2012, 02:26:41 pm
I agree with you in principle, Dave.  I wonder whether there might be concerns about Baez' agility as he fills out.  If so, this would suggest that he would be better suited to 3B down the road.

I agree that as Baez ages, he will have to move to third or first base.  But I doubt that that he will HAVE to move before he is in his latter 20s at the earliest.  Until then, it makes sense to keep him at the position where he has the most trade value.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 26, 2012, 02:31:22 pm
"considering some of the comments Theo made about a lack of plate discipline being pervasive throughout amateur scouting and minor league development, "

Did Epstein specifically state that this was pervasive throughout the amateur scouting system?  The Development system has been accused of this since the 1970s, but I have never heard anyone actually in baseball ever say it about the amateur scouting portion of the system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 26, 2012, 02:40:44 pm
Reb is right.  Sandberg never won a gold glove at third base.  But my point still stands.  I believe that if Sandberg had played third base all his career, and had the same offensive performance, I think it would have been much less likely that he would have gotten into the HOF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 26, 2012, 03:22:57 pm
"considering some of the comments Theo made about a lack of plate discipline being pervasive throughout amateur scouting and minor league development, "

Did Epstein specifically state that this was pervasive throughout the amateur scouting system?  The Development system has been accused of this since the 1970s, but I have never heard anyone actually in baseball ever say it about the amateur scouting portion of the system.

Here you go Dave . . .

Here is what Theo had to say about that: “That’s another thing we really need to continue to improve. If there was one thing that I was surprised by in a negative way it was how pervasive the lack of plate discipline was in the whole organization, at the major-league level, upper minors, lower minors, draft decision making and protocol. It’s just something that has not been a factor for a long time, and we’re paying the price for that."

http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/7226
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 26, 2012, 03:25:38 pm
Thanks, JR.  I missed that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on October 26, 2012, 04:00:19 pm
Not to quibble, but "draft decision making" and amateur scouting system are not quite synonymous, even though there is clearly a relationship of some kind.  The basic point is legitimate though.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on October 26, 2012, 04:22:08 pm
Ron, I think that's a legitimate point.  The scouts can have perfectly accurate reports, including that Almora is wonderful at X, Y, and Z, but doesn't take walks, and may well get you only two walks per 140 AB's with an IsoD of only 0.010.  The scouts can lay that all out, but eventually McLeod needs to make a decision.  If he doesn't value a walk-taking level of plate discipline very much, he may not consider the non-walk approach to be much of a liability. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on October 26, 2012, 04:45:39 pm
This leadership group's insistence on driving the "Cub Way" is a major step in the right direction.

For example, they obviously believe you can draft talented (and coachable) players who don't take lots of walks (e.g. Almora) and mold them into guys who can be taught plate discipline and/or otherwise do things their way (rather than let guys get by with their way and, then, suffer consequences by the MLB level). 

Our leader group seems very intentional about gathering all relevant information (about makeup as well as skills) re potential draftees/signees and, then, teaching what they want taught in the most effective way...with much better coaching and much better clarity about what players are accountable for.

It's gonna pay off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 26, 2012, 05:44:53 pm
Baez: 1-5, 2 RBI, SB, K

Szczur: 0-1

Silva: 1-3, BB

Zych: 1 IP, H

Rhoderick: 1-0-0-0-0-2


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_26_msswin_scowin_1

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_26_msswin_scowin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on October 26, 2012, 06:29:28 pm
Man how do you deal with that?  Must be awful.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on October 26, 2012, 06:58:07 pm
Ryne Sandberg got a gold glove at third base, but if the Cubs had kept him there, he would have probably had a more difficult time making the HOF.

And the Cubs likely would have had a harder time making it to the playoffs in 1984 and 1989.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 26, 2012, 09:30:49 pm
Cubs Front Office

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/team/front_office.jsp?c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on October 26, 2012, 10:23:28 pm
.....I believe that if Sandberg had played third base all his career, and had the same offensive performance, I think it would have been much less likely that he would have gotten into the HOF.

Pretty confident that you're right about that.

We only have to compare Santo and Sandberg.  Each played almost the same # of games in the majors (2243 to 2164) and, except for speed and SBs, Santo was a better offensive player than Sandberg.  Santo had career OPS+ of 125 to Sandberg's 114 (.826-Santo to .795-Sandberg raw OPS in different eras).

Had Sandberg stayed at 3B, he would be bumping up against Mike Schmidt's regular 3B gold gloves through 1986.  Assuming that Sandberg would win the 3B gold glove from 1987-1991 (his final 2B gold glove was in 1991), he would have had the same # of gold gloves (5) as Santo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 27, 2012, 07:39:57 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 3B, BB, K, CS

Baez: 0-2, 2 K

Silva: 0-3

Struck: 1-1-1-1-2-0

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_27_srrwin_msswin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 27, 2012, 08:38:02 pm
The Solar Sox are now 4-12. Guess they're playing for the #1 draft pick next year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on October 28, 2012, 08:48:27 pm
Concerning a guy like Shohei Otani, if the Cubs really wanted him and thought he could be a guy that advances fast, could they sign him to a major league deal with a low first year bonus, and then give him a salary for a couple million the next year without the second year salary counting against any sort of international cap?  I'd hesitate to to do it because odds are the guy wouldn't be ready in 3 years, and then what do you do with him when his options are up?  Plus, not sure I'd want to set that precedent...

But, if you think he has top half of the rotation starter potential, you need to figure out some way to sign him to continue to build depth.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on October 28, 2012, 09:50:52 pm
Whatever money you give a prospect counts against the cap, except for money that goes to a team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on October 29, 2012, 12:42:59 am
Under the new CBA, teams can't sign prospects to a major league contract, only to the standard one-year minor league contract. Any unwritten agreement for extra money later would be seriously punished by the Commissioner's office.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on October 29, 2012, 08:18:27 pm
According to the Trib, Baez injured his thumb, and is out for the rest of the AFL season.  The possible fracture to the tip of his thumb should be healed before spring training.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on October 29, 2012, 08:19:45 pm
He needed some time off anyway. Let the kid rest.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on October 29, 2012, 08:35:59 pm
Career-ending injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 29, 2012, 08:47:28 pm
Silva: 1-4, BB, 3 K

Rhee: 3-2-3-3-3-2

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_29_msswin_surwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on October 31, 2012, 03:51:37 am
Silva: 0-4, BB, 2 K

Rhoderick: 1-0-0-0-0-2

Zych: 1-2-1-1-0-1


http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l119&t=g_box&gid=2012_10_30_msswin_pddwin_1
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on October 31, 2012, 12:19:41 pm
A couple of Keith Law tweets:

Quote
keithlaw ‏@keithlaw
Javier Baez has left the AFL (thumb injury), replaced by Logan Watkins

keithlaw ‏@keithlaw
At the extreme. RT @jontehBest: @keithlaw What do you think Watkins ceiling is? Possible everyday 2b?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on November 02, 2012, 12:39:54 am
Jed Hoyer on Baez' injury:

Hoyer confirmed that it was an off-the-field injury, and the Cubs aren’t exactly sure how he incurred it. “A celebratory high five or some kind of thing,” Hoyer said. “They’re not sure exactly when he did it, but it was some sort of odd non-baseball-playing injury. It certainly wasn’t negative. It’s not like he punched a wall or anything. It sounds like he was celebrating and might have hit it wrong.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on November 02, 2012, 02:35:12 am
Well that doesnt sound like bs, huh?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 02, 2012, 11:13:05 am
It doesn't sound like BS to me.  It sounds like the kind of roughhousing that 19 year old kids do when left on their own.

But there is overwhelming evidence to show that Hoyer is lying.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 03, 2012, 02:21:17 pm
Friday's AFL box:

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2012_11_02_msswin_perwin_1&t=g_box&sid=l119
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 06, 2012, 11:03:23 am
The Cubs Minor League Free Agent List:

RHP: Jairo Asencio (AAA), Justin Berg (LoA), Rodrigo Lopez (AAA), Seth McClung (AAA), Blake Parker (AAA), Miguel Socolovich (AAA), Alvaro Sosa (HiA)
LHP: Horacio Ramirez (AAA), Ryan Rowland-Smith (AAA)
C: Juan Apodaca (AAA), Brian Esposito (AAA), Nathan Maldonado (AA)
2B: Adrian Cardenas (AAA), David Macias (LoA)
3B: Diory Hernandez (AAA), Nate Samson (AAA)
SS: Alfredo Amezaga (AAA), Vladimir Frias (HiA), Matt Tolbert (AAA)
OF: Jim Adduci (AAA), Jeff Frazier (AAA)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on November 06, 2012, 11:41:41 am
The only one that might have some value is Amezega, but we're pretty well set for shortstops, now and in the future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on November 06, 2012, 11:48:05 am
Aint David Macias a coach now or something?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on November 06, 2012, 11:55:36 am
Ascencio already signed with the Brewers, so he's gone.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on November 06, 2012, 12:14:07 pm
Kyler Burke resigned
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 06, 2012, 12:43:02 pm
Kyler Burke resigned

Arizona Phil should be happy. He seemed sure another team would offer him a major league contract if the Cubs' didn't add him to the 40-man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 06, 2012, 01:05:11 pm
Don't they have to add him to the roster to protect him from the rule v draft?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on November 06, 2012, 01:18:26 pm
resigned or resigned?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on November 06, 2012, 01:27:09 pm
Almost certainly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on November 06, 2012, 01:30:19 pm
Burke is still intriguing; I hope the Cubs find a way to keep him around...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 06, 2012, 02:14:35 pm
Don't they have to add him to the roster to protect him from the rule v draft?

If drafted Rule 5, a team would need to keep him on the big-league roster.  As a 6-year free agent, a team could have signed him and optioned him to the minors.   The fact that nobody signed him via free agency thus suggests that it's unlikely anybody will draft him via Rule 5. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 06, 2012, 03:47:56 pm
Unless the Cubs signed him before he actually hit the market.  That is typical for 6 year free agents that resign with the same team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on November 06, 2012, 03:52:32 pm
He was signed before he hit the open market.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 06, 2012, 04:26:42 pm
Perhaps he likes the Cubs instruction so well, and was paid so well, that the minor-league deal is preferable to a big-league contract with a ticking options clock.  If so, that's unusual.  Usually guys like to get onto the big-league roster.  But if he signed a minor-league contract with the Cubs when by waiting he would have signed a major-league contract with other teams, then he is a most unusual player. 

I guess my assumption was that he signed because he didn't expect any major-league 40-man-roster contracts from anybody else. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 06, 2012, 04:39:56 pm
I suspect that he signed with the Cubs because they gave him a lot more money than most minor leaguers make.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on November 06, 2012, 07:21:42 pm
That's very possible.  Guys normally prefer major-league contracts to minor-league contracts, and among other factors I imagine one factor is that major-league contracts generally pay better than minor-league contracts.   I imagine if the Cubs pay better than a big-league contract, that would make it easier to get him to resign. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 06, 2012, 07:33:23 pm
I imagine the biggest factor in something like that is the Cubs are familiar with him and think pretty well of him.  Plus the Cubs have had the last few months to sell him on returning to the organization.  If he goes to another organization, he's just another live left handed arm who came in on a minor league contract. 

Probably has more to do with the relationship the Cubs have developed with him and familiarity than it has to do with money and things like that.  I'd even imagine if you asked Burke if he thought about leaving, he'd say "no".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 06, 2012, 07:43:18 pm
Craig brings up a point that I don't know the answer to.  Does a minor leaguer get more money if he is put on the 40 man roster?  I don't believe that it true, unless he makes the 25 man roster.  I seem to remember that most have split contracts, in which they make a lot (relatively) if they are brought up, but very little if they play in the minors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 07, 2012, 02:12:08 am
According to Chicago Cubs Online, Baseball Prospectus' Top 10 list for the Cubs will be posted at 10:00 CST today. Do we have any BP subscribers out there?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on November 07, 2012, 05:53:20 am
It's actually already up.

1.     OF Albert Almora
2.     SS Javier Baez
3.     OF Jorge Soler
4.     RHP Arodys Vizcaino
5.     1B Dan Vogelbach
6.     OF Brett Jackson
7.     RHP Pierce Johnson
8.     RHP Duane Underwood
9.     3B Christian Villanueva
10.   RHP Dillon Maples

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=18809
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on November 07, 2012, 06:04:01 am
They also named Juan Carlos Paniagua, Marco Hernandez, and Jeimer Candelario, as the top three prospects on the rise.  Zych, McNutt, and Lake are named as three guys who will see major league time in 2013.  They also have the top 10 players under 25 listed, which is obviously headed by Castro and Rizzo (followed by the top 8 in the prospect list).

Here's their parting thought that kind of sums up the farm system:

Quote
A Parting Thought:….With a casual glance, the Cubs system might appear to be top heavy, with a partisan lean towards high-ceiling bats. But the deeper you dig, the more raw talent you discover on the mound, and even though it’s immature and a sizeable journey away from legitimacy, the talent is there to develop high-ceiling arms to match the high-ceiling bats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on November 07, 2012, 01:39:01 pm
BP obviously leans more toward raw potential than BA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 07, 2012, 01:41:58 pm
Marcos Mateo has re-signed with the Cubs.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/11/minor-league-transactions-oct-24-31/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on November 08, 2012, 11:35:15 am
A nice piece by Muskat on Almora:

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20121107&content_id=40192464&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 14, 2012, 09:10:16 pm
Rebel Ridling has been released. 

Also, the Cubs have re-signed Blake Parker.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2012/11/minor-league-transactions-nov-6-12/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 16, 2012, 12:37:49 pm
Good piece on Daniel Vogelbach.  He comes across very, very well. I sure wouldn't bet against this guy.


http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20121116&content_id=40316198&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc&tcid=tw_article_40316198
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on November 16, 2012, 03:25:57 pm
Vogelbach:

"You can't think home runs, because once you start thinking home runs you'll get a hit every five at-bats, and it's a home run, and I don't want to be like that."

Actually, I would take that.  Can't remember last time Cubs had a regular who hit 100 homers per season.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 16, 2012, 04:03:47 pm
Would make for a nice OPS, particularly when it would have a roughly 20% walk rate boosting the OBP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 19, 2012, 11:42:56 am
At Fangraphs, two of three "top performances" in AFL among players 22 or under were Cubs.  I'll leave it to the better statheads among us to figure out whether that is significant or not.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/daily-notes-ft-the-top-performances-of-the-afl/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 19, 2012, 04:35:05 pm
At Fangraphs, two of three "top performances" in AFL among players 22 or under were Cubs.  I'll leave it to the better statheads among us to figure out whether that is significant or not.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/daily-notes-ft-the-top-performances-of-the-afl/

• Other Cubs prospect Logan Watkins, 23 at the end of August, made his way to the top of SCOUT batting leaderboard late in the AFL season, mostly on the strength of an 8:3 walk-to-strikeout ratio in his 40 plate appearances. He was not ranked among Chicago’s top-15 prospects by Marc Hulet. What Watkins has done is logged a considerable number of starts at shortstop, second base, and center field over the last couple seasons.

Middle infielder/OF utility players with decent bats who can get on base are mighty nice to have around.  And a young one who could do that, under team control fro several years, can make it much easier to put together a winning team, not just because he can provide insurance against injury, and rest players, but also because he can provide in-house anti-awful insurance at multiple positions, making it easier for management to **** a bit with a youngster who might not be a sure thing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on November 20, 2012, 01:32:13 pm
i like watkins....mainly at 2B but maybe this season they give him more time in CF to see what he can do there...could be a valuable piece for us in the next few yrs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 21, 2012, 08:12:23 am
I'm not sure how much you can read into winter league statistics, but Esmailin Caridad, who's become a somewhat forgotten name, is having a really nice winter.  He might be ready to compete for a bullpen spot next year.

http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l132&t=p_pbp&pid=534428 (http://mlb.mlb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=l132&t=p_pbp&pid=534428)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 21, 2012, 09:34:33 am
I had thought that Caridad was young, an actual prospect.

Perhaps he still has some window of opportunity and can contribute in 2013, but he turned 29 last month.  Whatever window he might have is likely to close fairly soon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on November 21, 2012, 11:22:06 am
P2, did you ever make the "I don't think he's really trying; I think Esmailin it in" joke?  Did I miss it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on November 21, 2012, 11:48:01 am
I don't know how I missed that one, DMF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 21, 2012, 01:10:08 pm
Quote
Barret Loux, rhp
Age: 23. Born: Apr 6, 1989 in Houston.
Ht.: 6-5. Wt.: 215.
Bats: R. Throws: R.
School: Texas A&M.
Career Transactions: Selected by Diamondbacks in first round (sixth overall) of 2010 draft ... Granted free agency, Sept. 1, 2010 ... Signed by Rangers, Nov. 22, 2010.

Club (League)    Class    W    L    ERA    G    GS    SV    IP    H    R    ER    HR    BB    SO    WHIP
Frisco (TL)    AA    14    1    3.47    25    25    0    127    120    56    49    10    41    100    1.27

Major League Baseball declared Loux a free agent after the Diamondbacks didn't like what they saw in a post-draft physical and backed out of a deal with their 2010 first-round selection. He eventually signed with the Rangers for $312,000, while Arizona received a compensation pick they turned into righthander Archie Bradley. Loux reached Double-A in 2012 and made all his starts without incident, showing a simple, repeatable delivery and an idea of how to pitch. He works downhill, sits 90-92 mph and commands his fastball to both sides of the plate, though neither his velocity nor his secondary pitches separate him from the pack. His average slider and curveball blend together, but most scouts like his changeup best and think he knows how and when to use it. He profiles as an innings-eating No. 5 type on a good team.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/majors/trade-central/2012/2614353.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on November 21, 2012, 01:21:16 pm
why didn't CHI get this Loux guy in the original deal? his numbers look soooo good
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 21, 2012, 03:48:37 pm
The Cubs have signed RF Johermyn Chavez, SS Alberto Gonzalez, RF Brian Bogusevic, and C J.C. Boscan to minor league deals.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on November 21, 2012, 04:17:36 pm
Because they liked the other guy better?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on November 21, 2012, 05:56:32 pm
The Cubs obviously liked the other guy better.  I am pretty sure the Cubs are ALSO getting a PTBNL along with Loux. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on November 21, 2012, 06:55:27 pm
The Cubs presumably liked the other guy (Brigham) better if he was healthy, but I think it's fair to assume they now like Loux better. Also, I suspect that the PTBNL is the original one from the Soto trade, not an additional one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on November 21, 2012, 07:37:56 pm
It's just a reworked Soto trade that also had a PTBNL/cash.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on November 22, 2012, 03:03:50 am
They like Loux better because the other guy is broken.  They liked the other guy better before he was broken because Loux has average stuff and arm issues.  It's not a big deal either way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on November 22, 2012, 06:14:00 am
So in Loux of a better player,  they chose this guy?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 22, 2012, 09:04:22 am
You're OK, but you're no PlayTwo
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on November 22, 2012, 11:01:39 am
Something for Robb to be thankful for on this day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on November 28, 2012, 09:53:47 am
I don't think Josh Vitters' winter is working out quite the way he and the Cubs had hoped.

Paul Sullivan ‏@PWSullivan
Caracas Lions drop Josh Vitters after only two games and seven hitless at-bats in Venezuelan Winter League. #Ouch
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 28, 2012, 10:11:22 am
Almost certainly not the way the Cubs would have hoped.... but it's hard to tell with Vitters.  He might actually have been hoping for it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on November 28, 2012, 10:21:46 am
The roller coaster baseball career for Josh Vitters continues.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on November 28, 2012, 10:28:54 am
And like with a roller coaster, his career appears never again to be as promising as it was before he began.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on November 28, 2012, 10:37:38 am
I doubt that as much as 20 % of first round draft choices have as much promise a year or more after the draft as they did on draft day.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on November 28, 2012, 11:13:02 am
Don't the Cubs have to clear a 40 man roster space, maybe he's coming back for a physical cause he's getting traded....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on November 28, 2012, 02:56:33 pm
Vitters may end up being a scrub but IMO it's too early to tell yet.

He deserves a little more time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 29, 2012, 07:45:27 am
Quote from: Phil Rogers
Josh Vitters didn’t get a long look by the Caracas Lions this winter. He was released Tuesday and will return home Wednesday, according to team president Luis Avila in a story reported by El Universal in Venezuela.

Quote from: Bruce Miles tweet
Assigned to a different team in Venezuela to get more ABs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on November 29, 2012, 11:26:07 am
Both Rogers and Miles are correct

Quote from: Carrie Muskat
Josh Vitters is back home after a brief stint in Venezuela. He switched teams, leaving the Caracas squad after two games to play for an affiliate so he could get more playing time, the Cubs said. But Vitters has now returned to the U.S. to work out for the rest of the winter. Vitters, 23, batted .304 at Triple-A Iowa last season and was 12-for-99 (.121) in 36 games with the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on November 29, 2012, 04:12:14 pm
BA names Javier Baez #1 prospect in AZ Fall League:

1. Javier Baez, ss, Mesa Solar Sox (Cubs)

At 19, Baez was considered by many evaluators to have the highest ceiling in the league. Coming off an impressive full-season debut spent between two Class A levels, Baez batted just .211 with 14 strikeouts in 57 at-bats, but also slugged four home runs despite missing half of the season after breaking the tip of his left thumb.

Offensively, the 6-foot-1, 205-pound Baez displays plus raw power thanks to elite bat speed. He hit multiple home runs over 400 feet in games and countless more in batting practice. Baez has an aggressive approach that causes him to get behind in counts, exposing his offspeed struggles, but scouts believe he will hit for a solid average in time. Defensively, Baez displays impressive athleticism, good hands and a strong arm that should allow him to stick at shortstop long-term.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on December 02, 2012, 01:26:35 pm
Sickels put out his top 20.  Baez was an A, Almora, Soler B+, Vogelbach B, Vizcaino next as a B-. 
Cubs had 12 A-B-.  Lake and Vitters were C+/B-.  I think they went to about 25-30 down to C+.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on December 02, 2012, 02:40:55 pm
http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/12/2/3718190/chicago-cubs-top-20-prospects-for-2013


Here is the link.  Cubs went to 29 counting all the C+ players.  Last year there were 7 down to B- and 24 C+.  The C+ guys this year are much stronger as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 04, 2012, 08:27:07 pm
BA just did a report on players who could be selected in the Rule 5, and Nick Struck was one of them.

Quote
Nick Struck, rhp, Cubs: Strong-bodied at 5-foot-11, 185 pounds, Struck has solid control of a three-pitch mix and Double-A experience and was the Cubs' minor league pitcher of the year after going 14-10, 3.18 at Tennessee. He's mostly a sinker-slider guy whose changeup gives him a solid third offering when he finishes the pitch and gets some sink on it. His slider gets up to 83 mph and has to be on to give him a separator pitch. He's a relatively safe bet to stick among Rule 5 possibilities but has a lower ceiling than others listed here. Terry Doyle went second overall in last year's draft, and Struck fits a similar profile. He threw more than 170 innings counting his unimpressive Arizona Fall League stint, so he should be able to handle a heavy workload.

Mentioning the slider there, it got me to thinking about Michael Wuertz a little bit.  He was a pretty similar caliber starting pitching prospect back in the day, but his slider became nasty when he switched to relief full time.  Maybe a switch to relief could do Struck some good?
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 04, 2012, 08:44:00 pm
Struck is better than Coleman. I think.

That's about it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 04, 2012, 09:34:21 pm
You "think"?  Not much of a stretch, Dave. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 05, 2012, 08:56:36 pm
Any guesses on who the Cubs take tomorrow.  I would assume that it will be Lara.  At least I hope so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on December 05, 2012, 09:01:05 pm
Fields, Chaney, Lara, Perez would all interest me.  I think Fields and Chaney might contribute right away.  Lara is the power lefty arm.  Perez is another power lefty and only 21.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on December 05, 2012, 09:11:06 pm
Rumblings that the Cubs might trade the pick.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on December 05, 2012, 09:47:51 pm
Article on Almora and Rizzo meeting up in Florida.

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/cubs/16812465-573/cubs-albert-almora-in-great-shape-thanks-to-backyard-workout-regimen.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on December 05, 2012, 10:31:39 pm
Almora, in terms of make-up and work ethic, reminds of Jonathan Toews. Let's hope for similar results.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on December 05, 2012, 10:34:48 pm
Rizzo is equally impressive. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 06, 2012, 09:07:42 am
Carrie Muskat ‏@CarrieMuskat

#Dbacks take RHP Starling Peralta off #Cubs AAA roster
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 06, 2012, 09:09:06 am
Scratch one prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 06, 2012, 10:29:58 am
Jim Callis ‏@jimcallisBA

9. #Diamondbacks: Starling Peralta, rhp. Inconsistent & could wind up in pen, but can hit 96 mph & show plus slider when he's on. #Rule5..
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 06, 2012, 12:26:49 pm
Sorry to lose Peralta.  Fast, threw strikes, and sometimes lots of K's.  Hope we get him back.  I think Jeff had tabbed him as one of the guys he assumed would get protected. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on December 06, 2012, 01:18:43 pm
have we taken anyone?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 06, 2012, 01:22:17 pm
I can't help but wonder what it says about Nick Struck that he didn't get taken.  I figured someone would have taken a flyer on him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on December 06, 2012, 01:39:24 pm
who have we lost in minor league phase?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 06, 2012, 02:06:05 pm
I can't help but wonder what it says about Nick Struck that he didn't get taken.  I figured someone would have taken a flyer on him.

Craig probably bad-mouthed him somewhere sometime.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 06, 2012, 02:17:51 pm
Craig probably bad-mouthed him somewhere sometime.

Wouldn't he have dropped the "k" from his name in that case?  The new Nitro Nic?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 06, 2012, 02:22:41 pm
Good point.  If out of shame if nothing else.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 07, 2012, 08:44:28 am
Starling Peralta's velocity seems to have jumped a few mph since being picked in the Rule 5.

Quote
"He's got a big arm," D-backs farm director Mike Bell said. "We got a lot of good grades on him. You look at his numbers and I don't know if they'll jump out at you right away in [low Class A], but he's a guy with a lot of potential, a lot of upside and we'll get him into camp and see what he looks like."

Peralta still needs plenty of polish -- he walked 42 and fanned 86 in 2012 -- but given his mid-to-upper 90s fastball to go along with a curve and changeup, the D-backs felt he was worth taking a look at in Spring Training.

"If he stays in the big leagues, chances are he's going to have to move to the 'pen, but we'll see," Bell said. "We'll get him some innings and see what he looks like. The raw tools are there, and we'll get him into camp and see how close he is."

http://arizona.diamondbacks.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20121206&content_id=40552594&vkey=news_ari&c_id=ari
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 07, 2012, 08:47:13 am
This stuff about "if he stays in the big leagues" and "felt he was worth taking a look at in Spring Training" makes you think there's a pretty reasonable chance we'll get him back.

It sounds more or less like they're just taking a flier on Peralta because of his velocity.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 07, 2012, 08:57:45 am
Starling Peralta's velocity seems to have jumped a few mph since being picked in the Rule 5.

http://arizona.diamondbacks.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20121206&content_id=40552594&vkey=news_ari&c_id=ari

I think there were velocities like that reports during the summer as well, and earlier.  I think it's partly a case where when a scouting director adds a new guy, they maybe talk about some of his higher velocity days.  I think there were other games he'd pitch when he wasn't sitting in mid-upper 90's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 07, 2012, 09:35:38 am
That is probably one reason why teams try to do so much cross-checking before drafting their top choices.  If you see a pitcher on an off day as opposed to his "good" day, it can make quite a difference.  Seeing them often allows a better cross section of their abilities.  The biggest difference I have heard of was that of Underwood, who had a 10 mph difference between good and bad days, but I am sure that it applies to most pitchers.

And there are always problems with talking about the "top" velocity of a pitcher.  We know that a batter's home run distance can vary substantially.  Glenallen Hill did not hit every home run onto the roof across the street.  Most reports I have seen put Peralta's velocity at 93 - 95, so I have no problem believing that he can have an occasional outlier that can top that by 3 mph or so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on December 11, 2012, 12:53:57 pm
Minor League Staffs
Iowa- Marty Peavy (former catching coordinator), Mike Mason PC, Brian Harper HC (former Daytona manager)
Tenn- Bailey, Fassero PC, Desi Wilson HC (moved from Daytona)
Daytona- Dave Keller (former Iowa HC), Mariano Duncan HC, Storm Davis PC (new to org)
Kane- Mark Johnson (former Boise manager), Ron Villone PC, Tom Beyers HC
Boise- Gary Van Tol, David Rosario PC, Buckner HC
Mesa- Bobby Mitchell, Ricardo Medina & Jimmy Gonzalez HC, PC?
Dominican- Ozorio, Leo Hernandez PC, Oscar Benard HC
Venezuelan- Osmin Melendez, Franklin Blanco HC,  PC?
Field Coordinator- Tim Cousins (from Marlins)
Pitching Coordinator- Tim Johnson (from Vanderbilt)
Hitting Coordinator+ additional projects- Anthony Iapoce (from Blue Jays)
Hitting Coordinator (A, Rookie, Dominican)- Carmelo Martinez
Infield Coordinator- Jose Flores (new)
Outfield/Base Running- Leo Tinsely

The Venezuelan team is new, I wonder if the Cubs dropped a DSL team?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 11, 2012, 01:03:36 pm
A lot of pretty respectable former major leaguers as minor league coaches . . .  Brian Harper, Jeff Fassero, Mariano Duncan, Storm Davis, Ron Villone, Bill Buckner, and Carmelo Martinez. 

Quote
The Venezuelan team is new, I wonder if the Cubs dropped a DSL team?

That's kind of interesting, since most major league teams have deserted the Venezuelan Summer League.  The Mariners, Rays, Tigers, and Phillies were the only organizations fielding teams in Venezuela last season.

That doesn't seem quite like the Cubs to fold up their second DSL team to set up shop in a league that's barely viable anymore, so I imagine this is a completely new team.  Hopefully it's a good sign of us expanding our international operations.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on December 11, 2012, 01:26:57 pm
shouldn't that Tinsley guy be Lee Tinsley who also is a former MLeaguer?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 11, 2012, 01:31:13 pm
A lot of teams have left Venezuela because of the political turmoil there, which has made things quite dangerous at times.  But the Cubs have been quite active recruiting players form there such as Amaya, and currently, Rondon.  It may make it easier to recruit players if you can have them play their first year near home.  And I assume that the staff will be Venezuelan citizens, who would probably be safer that rich foreigners that might be kidnapping targets.

Have they shut down their second DR team?  I haven't seen that reported anywhere, although it looks like there is only one set of coaches listed.  On the other hand, they don't seem to list the staff of the DR academy either.  But with the new rules on overseas signings, it makes sense to expand recruiting into the rest of Latin America, rather than spend all their assets and energies in one small island.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on December 11, 2012, 02:01:53 pm
It is Lee Tinsley, not Leo.

The list came from Muskrats blog and I swear there were 2 sets of Dominican coaches last year that's why I was asking cause it seemed strange.  It could also be that Muskrat doesn't now there are 2 Dominican teams either and she left off a few pitching coaches as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 11, 2012, 02:47:46 pm


The Venezuelan team is new, I wonder if the Cubs dropped a DSL team?

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/minorleagues/affiliates/index.jsp?c_id=chc
Affiliate Information

    Iowa Cubs (PCL)
    Stats | Schedule | Roster | Tickets
    Tennessee Smokies (SOU)
    Stats | Schedule | Roster | Tickets
    Daytona Cubs (FSL)
    Stats | Schedule | Roster | Tickets
    Kane County Cougars (MID)
    Stats | Schedule | Roster
    Boise Hawks (NOR)
    Stats | Schedule | Roster | Tickets
    AZL Cubs (AZL)
    Stats | Schedule | Roster
    DSL Cubs1 (DSL)
    Stats | Schedule | Roster
    DSL Cubs2 (DSL)
    Stats | Schedule | Roster


It certainly appeared that they had two of them in 2012.

I imagine there might be some benefits of having one rookie team in the Dominican and another in Venezuala, but if that is all they are doing, it would not appear to be a very significant move.  It would have been encouraging to have seen them add another entire team to their minor league affiliates.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 11, 2012, 03:52:59 pm
Patrick Mooney has a run-down on the Cubs' minor league staff, and confirms that there will be only one Dominican team.

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-The-rundown-on-the-minor-league-sta?blockID=812539&feedID=10336
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 11, 2012, 04:23:18 pm
That's kind of interesting that we're moving one of the teams to Venezuela.  Then again, maybe I read something about how some of the non-Dominican players were having issues assimilating with the rest of the team in on those DSL teams? 

I wonder if any other MLB team will get back into the Venezuelan league.
Title: Minor league prospects
Post by: dallen7908 on December 16, 2012, 08:43:07 pm
In order to facilitate discussion about some of the more obscure Cub prospects (in a time of limited minor league news) I'd like to start a countdown of Cub minor leaguers.

If you're interested,  please choose up to 5 players (from the list below) that you believe should advance to the next round of prospect countdown.  After a few days, I will then add up the votes and choose the top 5 players to move on to the next round where they will be joined by ~7 new prospects. 

FYI, the first 5 players listed are the one's I voted for.  They will advance if noone else votes!

160.   LHRP Victor Garcia 6'2" 175 Lbs (199204) [VE-2009] In 2012, 39/12 K/W in 34 DSL IP (0.195 BAA).

161.   3B Brad Zapenas 6'3" 185 Lbs R/R (198912) [2011-42; Boston College] In 2012, 0.273/0.385/0.312 in 91 MWL PA. Injury to shoulder required labrum surgery; Did not play after May 10.

162.   RHSwing Felix Pena 6'2" 186 Lbs (199002) [DO-2008] In 2012, 42/22 K/W in 63 NWL IP (0.243 BAA).

163.   2B Antonio Gonzalez 5'10" 170 Lbs B/R (199401) (2010-DO) In 2012, 0.237/0.342/0.298 in 149 DSL PA. 32/18 K/W.

164.   1B Rock Shoulders 6’2” 225Lbs L/R (199109) [2011-25; Fl Manatee College] 0.250/0.342/0.477 in 236 NWL PA. Matched Vogelbach in NWL HR but not attention.

165.   RF Elleser Bonne 6'2" 180 Lbs R/R (198702) [Cuba] Debuted stateside in 2012, posted 0.275/0.293/0.360 in 363 FSL PA. 24/37 in SB.

166.   3B/LF Jonathan Mota 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (198706) [2003-VZ] Missed much of 2012 due to elbow injury that required TJS but did hit well during limited PA. 0.867 OPS in 81 PA split between SL and PCL.

167.   RHSwing Joe Zeller 5'10" 190 Lbs (198710) [2010-28, CA college] In 2012, 54/25 K/W in 98 IP (0.274 BAA) mostly between FSL (32 IP) where he was reliever and MWL (60 IP) where he was a starter.

168.   RHSwing Yomar Morel 6'1" 180 Lbs (199311) [DO-2011] In 2012, 24/7 K/W in 25 DSL IP (0.294 BAA).

169.   LF/RF Xavier Batista 6'3" 190 Lbs R/R (199201) [DO-2008] In 2012, 0.198/0.283/0.335 in 186 NWL PA. 0 SB. 0.154 BA vs RHP.

170.   2B/3B Daniel Lockhart 5'11" 165 Lbs L/R (199211) [2011-10, GA HS] In 2012, Repeated AZL but still struggling. 0.221/0.302/0.305 in 208 PA.

171.   RHswing Gilberto Abreu 6'2" 180 Lbs (199308) (2010-DO). 87-91 FB when signed
In 2011, 34/34 K/W in 35.1 DSL IP (29H & 1 HR allowed) In 2012, only pitched 3 innings: injured.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 16, 2012, 08:58:46 pm
Xavier Batista and Daniel Lockhart.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 16, 2012, 09:28:40 pm
Batista is the only one I would give a reasonable chance of ever appearing on the active roster of a major league team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 17, 2012, 06:41:35 pm
Today's list of prospects to consider. Choose up to 5.

153.   LF/RF Xavier Batista 6'3" 190 Lbs R/R (199201) [DO-2008] Led his DSL team in HR in 2011.  In 2012, 0.198/0.283/0.335 in 186 NWL PA. 0 SB. 0.154 BA vs RHP.

154.   LF: Dong-yub Kim 6'4" 200 Lbs R/R (199007) [Kor-2011] In 2012, 0.250/0.288/0.455 in 116 NWL PA. Displayed good power (0.205 ISO) but poor K/W (33/4).

155.   2B/3B Daniel Lockhart 5'11" 165 Lbs L/R (199211) [2011-10, GA HS] In 2012, Repeated AZL but still struggled. 0.221/0.302/0.305 in 208 PA.

156.   C Micah Gibbs 5'11" 223 Lb B/R (198807) [2009-03, LSU] Good receiver but weak bat.  In 2012, 0.200/0.338/0.297 in 218 FSL PA.

157.   LF/RF Nelson Perez 6'3" 215 Lb (198711) L/R [2006-DO] Repeated AA/A+,In 2012,  Early season SL struggles (0.205 BA; 127 AB) led to demotion to FSL where he hit 0.278(263 AB; 0.380 OBP) with 0.216 ISO.

158.   RHRP Pete Levitt 6'5" 235 lb (198904) [2011-32, Mt. Olive] Demoted to NWL to begin 2012 where he struggled.  Rebounded to post 25/12 K/W in 22 MWL IP (0.256 BAA).

159.   RHRP Bryce Shafer 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (198811) [2010-49, Valparaiso] In 2012, Repeated NWL/MWL with slightly worse results than 2011. 36/19 K/W in 35 MWL IP (0.262 BAA).

160.   1B Paul Hoilman 6'4" 240 Lbs R/R (198902) [2011-19, E Tenn St] In 2012 posted 0.237/0.326/0.392 in 463 MWL PA. Showed much more power in 2011 when he led NWL with 17 HR.

161.   RHRP Ryan Hartman 6'3" 180 Lbs (199205) [2010-16, IL HS] In 2012, repeated AZL again with much worse numbers: In 2012, 13/9 K/W in 16 IP (0.395 BAA, yikes!)

162.   LHRP Victor Garcia 6'2" 175 Lbs (199204) [VE-2009] In 2012, 39/12 K/W in 34 DSL IP (0.195 BAA).

163.   3B Brad Zapenas 6'3" 185 Lbs R/R (198912) [2011-42; Boston College] In 2012, 0.273/0.385/0.312 in 91 MWL PA. Injury to shoulder required labrum surgery; Did not play after May 10.

164.   2B Antonio Gonzalez 5'10" 170 Lbs B/R (199401) (2010-DO) In 2012, 0.237/0.342/0.298 in 149 DSL PA. 32/18 K/W.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 17, 2012, 06:50:56 pm
Gibbs and Hoilman
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 17, 2012, 06:51:43 pm
Don g Yub Kim should be on there because he's Jigs' favorite Cub prospect.   

I guess I'll put in a vote for Lockhart too, although he's not that impressive either.  Ryan Hartman was a guy who had some decent velocity coming out of college IIRC.  Paul Hoilman gets a vote because he can hit a few home runs.  And maybe we'll convert Nelson Perez into a pitcher someday.

Pretty much when you're talking about the 150th ranked prospects in the Cubs organization, you're not talking about players with high likelihoods of becoming Hall of Famers in the future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on December 17, 2012, 08:38:08 pm
LOL...Dong Yub.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 17, 2012, 08:54:45 pm
See there? I think Don g Yub needs to stay in the competition as long as possible.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 17, 2012, 10:48:42 pm
Batista/Levitt/Hoilman
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 18, 2012, 05:57:26 am
It's depressing to go back and look at good, supposedly deep farm systems and see a couple guys make it on average out of their top 10..some have been zero...for a lucky few 6-8.  Let's hoping we're in the 6-8 range.  That takes a lot of luck, and i'm guessing the difference between a great player development team and anything else.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 18, 2012, 06:41:37 am
It's depressing to go back and look at good, supposedly deep farm systems and see a couple guys make it on average out of their top 10..some have been zero...for a lucky few 6-8.  Let's hoping we're in the 6-8 range.  That takes a lot of luck, and i'm guessing the difference between a great player development team and anything else.

That is true also in the rest of life... it is very, very rare for anyone, in any endeavor, or in any aspect of life, to reach his or her potential.  And for any number of reasons, it is perfectly the norm for most of us to fall far short of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNzBgR0UoYo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNzBgR0UoYo)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 18, 2012, 09:46:10 am
At a very early age, CurtOne showed the potential to be a lazy *********, and he fulfilled his potential to the fullest.

And JR grew from being a snot nosed brat into a full grown snot nosed man.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 18, 2012, 10:37:54 am
You spelled that with too many *'s.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 18, 2012, 11:58:56 am
It's depressing to go back and look at good, supposedly deep farm systems and see a couple guys make it on average out of their top 10..some have been zero...for a lucky few 6-8.  Let's hoping we're in the 6-8 range.  That takes a lot of luck, and i'm guessing the difference between a great player development team and anything else.

It's exciting to imagine what we could build, lineup wise, with castro, Rizzo, and the Big 4 position prospects Baez, Soler, Almora, and Vogelbach.  Two very promising young major leaguers and four very substantial prospects.   Both success and the speed of that rebuild depends heavily on how those six specific players pan out.

I love the philosophy and approach the Cubs have taken, and I'm enthused about their ongoing ability to scout, procure, and develop talent.  But I think much of the Cub future is really going to depend on those six specific case-by-case individuals.  As Jeff says, we need to get some stars, some middle-of-the-lineup building blocks.  I doubt it's Theo's philosophy that will determine whether any or several of these six guys become stars.   

Vizcaino, Paniagua, Johnson, Underwood, Maples, Rondon are another six pitchers with variably good arms, each with at least a chance to become an asset pitcher or in some cases perhaps even a star.  They won't all work out, the combination of stuff/command/health converges only rarely.  But having a couple of guys from that pool of pitchers work out really well would make a ton of difference. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 18, 2012, 12:16:35 pm
I think it could be Theo's philosophy to a point.  Cubs have had invested in the draft and have had good prospects in the past but have always lagged behind in player development.  I HOPE having a guy who emphasizes player development and demanding results from everyone makes a difference for these guys. 

It goes back to looking at the highly ranked systems that succeeded versus failed at producing contributing major league players...i wonder if the difference was simply a better development staff.  It seems like a lot of teams have spent money at some point in time.  Luck is important, but the smaller the odds you leave to luck, the less chance luck might bite you in the Guggenheim.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 18, 2012, 01:44:49 pm
I have maintained for the past 50 years that the Cubs development system was terrible.

But Craig is right that not all the top prospects will make it.  Even the best development systems have failures.  Back in the 90s, the Mets had what many considered to be the best three pitching prospects in the majors.  I don't remember their names (Wilson might have been one of them, and a guy named Portugal), but all were in AAA and were considered to be major league ready.

Not a single one of the three had much better than a mediocre career.

Luck plays an important part in any team's success.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 18, 2012, 01:50:32 pm
Bill Pulsipher  Jason Isringhausen  Paul Wilson
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on December 18, 2012, 01:57:43 pm
Paul Wilson is the guy that Kyle Farnsworth obliterated in the brawl with the Reds in 2003 (or was it 2004?).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 18, 2012, 01:58:28 pm
Thanks.  those are the three.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 18, 2012, 02:23:09 pm
The big 4 position prospects and the big 4 distant pitching prospects (Maples/Underwood/Paniagua/Johnson) will provide an interesting challenge for development. 

Baez and Almora both start out as on the extreme end of the big-leg-kick anti-walk spectrum.  Baez wasn't scouted and drafted by McLeod.  But the first year of Baez's development under Theo's philosophy showed no obvious indication that he was developing hitting discipline; the scouting reports late summer in Daytona, and then again in AFL, seemed to report leg kicks and wild swing-for-the-fence hacking that sounded no more disciplined at the end of the year than had been true at the beginning.  Almora was obviously chosen by McLeod and the current staff, and took 2 walks to 140 AB, so his rookie profile matches his predraft profile as an exceptional anti-walker.  Starting so far on the extreme anti-walk end, these are two interesting case studies to see how the Cubs develop them.  And Baez's huge leg-kicking hackaway swing seems to be both on the mechanical and strategic extreme.  They were what they were, and clearly whatever input the McLeod Cubs gave them did not result in first-year transformation.  But my  guess is that a common developmental approach is to let a guy do it his way for a while, and then work on incorporating changes thereafter.  To some degree I was surprised that Baez was sent to AFL, outside of Cubs hands.  I thought they might want him in instrux where they could work with him there.  But, perhaps they are taking the approach that Sveum mentioned for Jackson; put him somewhere where he can fail often so that he'll be more interested in making some changes.  Perhaps hitting .188 at Daytona and .211 in AFL, and getting embarrassed by a bunch of curveballs, might make him more willing to tame his swing a little?  Who knows. 

Anyway, if the Cubs were to succeed in developing both Baez and Almora into disciplined, productive hitters, that would be a pretty impressive testament to the powers of good coaching. 

On the pitching side, Maples seems super wild and inconsistent, and Underwood also wild and inconsistent.  Again, if Theo's guys can develop them into highly productive pitchers, those are two challenging projects whose successful development would be a real testament to an effective system.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on December 18, 2012, 06:23:53 pm
I hope the Big 4 turn out better than the Iowa 4.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 18, 2012, 06:26:50 pm
Who were the Iowa 4?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 18, 2012, 08:21:12 pm
Brownlie, Hagerty, Blasko, and Clanton?


Today's list of prospects.  Once again vote for up to 5.



147.   1B Paul Hoilman 6'4" 240 Lbs R/R (198902) [2011-19, E Tenn St] In 2012 posted 0.237/0.326/0.392 in 463 MWL PA. Showed much more power in 2011 when he led NWL with 17 HR.

148.   LF: ****-yub Kim 6'4" 200 Lbs R/R (199007) [Kor-2011] In 2012, 0.250/0.288/0.455 in 116 NWL PA. Displayed good power (0.205 ISO) but poor K/W (33/4).

149.   RHRP Chang-Yong Lim 5’11” 175 Lbs (1976??) (KO) 17-year veteran of Korean and Japan leagues.  Closer for Yakult Swallows from 2008-2011. Pitched for KO in 2009 WBC. Had 2nd TJ surgery in early 2012 and is hopeful of joining Cub minor league team sometime in 2013.

150.   LF/RF Xavier Batista 6'3" 190 Lbs R/R (199201) [DO-2008] Led his DSL team in HR in 2011.  In 2012, 0.198/0.283/0.335 in 186 NWL PA. 0 SB. 0.154 BA vs RHP.

151.   C Micah Gibbs 5'11" 223 Lb B/R (198807) [2009-03, LSU] Good receiver but weak bat.  In 2012, 0.200/0.338/0.297 in 218 FSL PA. Batted 0.313 vs LHP & 0.140 vs RHP.

152.   CF? Evan Crawford 6'1" 165 Lbs R/R (198808) [2009-09(Giants), Indiana U, for
Fontenot] In 2011, 0.307/0.362/0.401 in 446 FSL AB (32-38 in SB).  2011 FSL postseason allstar team. Injured in 2012. 

153.   C Sergio Burruel 5'11" 210 Lb L/R (199107) [2009-19, AZ HS] In 2012, 0.249/0.314/0.302 in 44 FSL PA & 140 MWL PA.

154.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

155.   2B/SS Bryan Flete 5’10” 146 Lbs B/R (199301, VE) 0.296/0.419/0.419 in 212 DSL PA.

156.   RHswing Ethan Elias 6’3” 180 Lbs (199304) [2011-22, Alberta HS] member of Canadian Jr. Nat’l Team. 22/6 K/W in 30AZL IP (0.311 BAA).

157.   2B/SS/3B David Bote 5’11” 170 Lbs R/R (199304) [2012-18, Kansas JC] Member of JUCO World Series All Star Team. Father and brother were college SS too. In 2012, 0.232/0.349/0.360 in 144 AZL PA. 32/19 K/W.

158.   RHRP Ryan Hartman 6'3" 180 Lbs (199205) [2010-16, IL HS] In 2012, repeated AZL again with much worse numbers: In 2012, 13/9 K/W in 16 IP (0.395 BAA, yikes!)
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 18, 2012, 08:58:45 pm
Hodges/Elias
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 18, 2012, 09:06:30 pm
Don g Yub, Burriel, Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 18, 2012, 09:20:42 pm
Lim and Gibbs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 18, 2012, 09:43:42 pm
Crawford and Batista
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on December 19, 2012, 02:11:15 pm
Bullish reviews of Szczur and Jokisch:

http://www.bleachernation.com/2012/12/18/prospects-progress-szczur-and-jokisch/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on December 19, 2012, 02:18:19 pm
Jesse Hodges!

http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20121219&content_id=40749286&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 19, 2012, 07:32:32 pm
Today's list of prospects. Once again vote for up to 5.


140.   3B/LF/RF Anthony Giansanti 5'10" 190 Lbs (198809) [2009-49(Athletics)] Best OF arm in system (BA2012). Injuries limited his PA in 2012. Spent most of year in MWL again. 0.696 OPS in 106 PA. 

141.   RHRP Su-Min Jung 6'2" 190 Lbs (199004) [KR-2009] In 2012, 25/18 K/W in 25 NWL IP (0.196 BAA). Control still a big concern but improving.

142.   LF/RF Ty Wright 6'0" 200 Lbs R/R (198502) [2007-07, OK St] 0.287(0.348 OBP) in 230 PCL AB.  Little speed and a smidgen of power. Missed last 2 months of 2012 with injury.

143.   LHSwing Chris Pieters (199403) [2011-Curacao] 24/47 K/W in 33 DSL IP (0.237 BAA).  Very raw.

144.   RHSwing Brett Wallach 6'5" 205 Lb (198812) [2009-03(Dodgers), Orange Co CC]
 [2011 BA17]   Hit hard in FSL in 2011 and early 2012.  Out with injury since then.

145.   3B/SS/2B Wes Darvill 6'2" 175 Lb L/R (199109) [2009-05, BCol HS] In 2012, 0.224/0.285/0.306 in 486 MWL PA.

146.   RHRP Eduardo Figueroa 6'1" 185 Lbs (198811) [2007, VE] Repeated FSL with similar numbers. 59/29 K/W in 77 IP (0.218 BAA).

147.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

148.   RHRP Chang-Yong Lim 5’11” 175 Lbs (1976??) (KO) 17-year veteran of Korean and Japan leagues.  Closer for Yakult Swallows from 2008-2011. Pitched for KO in 2009 WBC. Had 2nd TJ surgery in early 2012 and should join a high-level Cub minor league team this spring. 

149.   CF? Evan Crawford 6'1" 165 Lbs R/R (198808) [2009-09(Giants), Indiana U, for
Fontenot] In 2011, 0.307/0.362/0.401 in 446 FSL AB (32-38 in SB).  2011 FSL postseason allstar team. Injured in 2012. 

150.   RHswing Ethan Elias 6’3” 180 Lbs (199304) [2011-22, Alberta HS] member of Canadian Jr. Nat’l Team. 22/6 K/W in 30AZL IP (0.311 BAA).

151.   LF/RF Xavier Batista 6'3" 190 Lbs R/R (199201) [DO-2008] Led his DSL team in HR in 2011.  In 2012, 0.198/0.283/0.335 in 186 NWL PA. 0 SB. 0.154 BA vs RHP.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 19, 2012, 07:46:39 pm
I don't think I want to vote for any of those guys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 19, 2012, 07:48:26 pm
So how does this vote thing work anyway?  I mean I put in my votes for Don g Yub and Burruel, and neither one of them are on today's list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 19, 2012, 09:12:01 pm
When any grownup votes for someone, dallen moves them up.

I agree, none are worth voting for.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on December 19, 2012, 09:38:38 pm
Pieters is worth watching.  They signed him for $400,000.  Really far off though.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 19, 2012, 10:04:03 pm
Hodges/Elias, again...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 20, 2012, 01:10:50 am
Hodges, Pieters, Crawford, Giansanti
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 20, 2012, 09:05:48 am
Batista and Crawford again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 20, 2012, 08:54:53 pm
Once again vote for up to 5.  Since there are frequent ties.  Feel free to rank your selections.


133.   C Alberto Mineo 5'11" 165 Lbs L/R (199307) (2010-Italy, $225K) In 2012, struggled in US debut: 0.157/0.295/0.157 in 61 AZL PA.

134.   RHRP Mike Hamann 6’3” 165 Lbs (199101) [2012-16, U Toledo]  Arthroscopic shoulder surgery  in 2011.  Struggled early in 2012, but recorded a 2.12 ERA over his final five starts for Toledo.  Low 90s FB when used for short stints. Also has slider & curve. 6/2 K/W in 10 NWL IP (0.262 BAA).

135.   RHRP Larry Suarez: 6'4" 245 Lbs (198912) (2006-VZ) In 2012, Shelled in FSL.  Demoted to MWL where he posted 38/21 K/W in 43 IP (0.281 BAA).

136.   CF/LF Rashad Crawford 6’3” 185 Lbs S/R (199310) [2012-11, GA HS] 0.167/0.324/0.167 in 37 AZL PA.  Plus plus speed.

137.   C Carlos Escobar 6’2” 185 Lbs R/R (199012) [2012-15, U Nevada]  Good receiver/blocker with average arm. Quiet swing that gets long at times. In 2012, 0.234/0.358/0.390 in 92 PA between AZL (31PA) and NWL.

138.   3B/1B Jacob Rogers 6’5” 195 Lbs L/R (198908) [2012-40, Mt. Olive college] Dominated as expected versus much younger pitchers in AZL (0.999 OPS) but followed with surprising 0.300/0.493/0.420 in 69 MWL PA. 14/19 K/W in MWL.  Has most pure power of 2012 Cub draftees.

139.   LHRP Sheldon McDonald (198811) [2011-33; British Columbia College] 57/16 K/W in 62 MWL IP (0.205 BAA)

140.   LHSwing Chris Pieters (199403) [2011-Curacao] 24/47 K/W in 33 DSL IP (0.237 BAA).

141.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

142.   CF? Evan Crawford 6'1" 165 Lbs R/R (198808) [2009-09(Giants), Indiana U, for
Fontenot] In 2011, 0.307/0.362/0.401 in 446 FSL AB (32-38 in SB).  2011 FSL postseason allstar team. Injured in 2012. 

143.   RHswing Ethan Elias 6’3” 180 Lbs (199304) [2011-22, Alberta HS] member of Canadian Jr. Nat’l Team. 22/6 K/W in 30AZL IP (0.311 BAA).

144.   LF/RF Xavier Batista 6'3" 190 Lbs R/R (199201) [DO-2008] Led his DSL team in HR in 2011.  In 2012, 0.198/0.283/0.335 in 186 NWL PA. 0 SB. 0.154 BA vs RHP.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 20, 2012, 10:45:21 pm
RCrawford/Rogers/McDonald/Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 20, 2012, 10:58:27 pm
1.  Rashad Crawford

Write In - Don g Yub
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 20, 2012, 10:59:50 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gnoHapFxqQ
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 20, 2012, 11:55:21 pm
McDonald
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 21, 2012, 12:46:19 am
E. Crawford, Pieters, Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 21, 2012, 06:30:42 am
Hamann, Elias,
Crawford, Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 21, 2012, 08:43:39 am
1) Evan Crawford
2) Batista
3) Rogers
4) Rasheed Crawford
5) Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 21, 2012, 08:21:25 pm

For JR: Once again vote for up to 5.

126.   RHRP Corbin Hoffner 6’5” 235 Lbs (199307) [2012-14, FL St. Petersburg CC]. Impressive size. Has OK FB, changeup and slider. In 2012, 13/4 K/W in 12 AZL IP (0.288 BAA).

127.   RHRP Steve Perakslis 6’1” 185 Lbs (199101) [2012-21, Maine] Solid low 90s FB but secondary stuff is work in progress. In 2012, 26/6 K/W in 25 AZL IP (0.230 BAA).

128.   3B/1B Ben Carhart: 5’10” 200 Lbs  R/R (199001) [2012-35, Stetson U] In 2012, 0.353/0.419/0.456 in 151 AZL PA against (mostly) much younger pitchers. Natural hitter with gap power and strong arm.

129.   LHRP Nathan Dorris 6’3” 185 Lbs (199012) [2012-17, Southern Illinois] FB velocity fluctuates but can reach 90-91.  When pitching well also has effective curveball. 13/7 K/W in 14 NWL IP (0.235 BAA).  Late round steal (BA?)

130.   LHSP Angel Mejias 6'3" 180 Lbs (199310) [VE, 2010] 57/23 K/W in 69 DSL IP (0.233 BAA).

131.   C Yaniel Cabeza 5'11" 185 Lbs R/R (198904) (2010-Cuba, $550K) Defensive standout with very weak bat. In 2012,  0.197/0.233/0.245 in 218 MWL PA.     

132.   C/3B/1B Taylor Davis 5’11” 185 Lbs (198911) [2011-FA, Morehead St] 0.902 OPS in 73 MWL PA followed by 0.627 OPS in 178 FSL PA. 24/21 K/W in FSL. 

133.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

134.   CF/LF Rashad Crawford 6’3” 185 Lbs S/R (199310) [2012-11, GA HS] 0.167/0.324/0.167 in 37 AZL PA.  Plus plus speed.

135.   CF? Evan Crawford 6'1" 165 Lbs R/R (198808) [2009-09(Giants), Indiana U, for
Fontenot] In 2011, 0.307/0.362/0.401 in 446 FSL AB (32-38 in SB).  2011 FSL postseason allstar team. Injured in 2012. 

136.   3B/1B Jacob Rogers 6’5” 195 Lbs L/R (198908) [2012-40, Mt. Olive college] Dominated as expected versus much younger pitchers in AZL (0.999 OPS) but followed with surprising 0.300/0.493/0.420 in 69 MWL PA. 14/19 K/W in MWL.  Has most pure power of 2012 Cub draftees.

137.   LHRP Sheldon McDonald (198811) [2011-33; British Columbia College] 57/16 K/W in 62 MWL IP (0.205 BAA)

138.   LF: Dong-yub Kim 6'4" 200 Lbs R/R (199007) [Kor-2011] In 2012, 0.250/0.288/0.455 in 116 NWL PA. Displayed good power (0.205 ISO) but poor K/W (33/4).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 21, 2012, 08:26:01 pm
1) Evan Crawford
2) Rogers
3) Rasheed Crawford
4) Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 21, 2012, 08:51:57 pm
Rashad Crawford
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 21, 2012, 09:03:52 pm
Mejias, Hoffman, Dorris

Crawford, Hodges
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 21, 2012, 09:58:20 pm
McDonald
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 21, 2012, 10:57:39 pm
Rogers, Davis and McDonald.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 22, 2012, 12:42:10 am
Dorris, E. Crawford, Hodges, R. Crawford
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 22, 2012, 10:02:43 pm
Today's list.  Once again vote for up to 5 and specify  R vs E Crawford


118.   RF/LF/CF Garrett Schlecht 6'2" 198 Lb L/L (199302) [2011-09, Illinois HS] In 2012, 0.252/0.359/0.345 in 139 AZL PA.

119.   RHSwing Pedro Araujo 6’3” 214 Lbs (199307) [2011-DR, $100K] In 2012, 47/12 K/W in 53 DSL IP (0.245 BAA).

120.   LHRP Jeff Lorick 6'0" 195 Lbs (198712) [2009-20(Braves)] In 2012, after dominating in MWL (0.148 BAA in 17 IP) posted 41/18 K/W in 39 FSL IP (0.295 BAA).

121.   C Rafael Lopez 5'9" 190 Lbs L/R (198710) [2011-16, FSU] Split time between MWL and FSL.  Hit 0.269/0.338/0.403 in 132 FSL PA. MWL mid-season allstar in 2012.

122.   RHSwing James Pugliese 6'3" 195 Lbs (199208) [2011-18, NJ CC] In 2012, 51/22 K/W in 60 NWL IP (0.307 BAA)

123.   SS Francisco Sanchez 6'2" 170 lb R/R (199312)[DO-2010] $350K bonus. In 2012, repeated DSL with slightly worse numbers: 0.196/0.242/0.330 in 204 DSL PA (64/10 K/W and 7-12 SB).

124.   RHSwing Justin Amlung 6’1” 180 Lbs (199005) [2012-12, U Louisville] 2nd in career wins & ERA at Louisville. Features low 90sFB, average slider, and so-so changeup. In 2012, struggled during 12 IP NWL debut. 6/4 K/W (0.404 BAA).

125.   CF/LF Rashad Crawford 6’3” 185 Lbs S/R (199310) [2012-11, GA HS] 0.167/0.324/0.167 in 37 AZL PA.  Plus plus speed.

126.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

127.   CF? Evan Crawford 6'1" 165 Lbs R/R (198808) [2009-09(Giants), Indiana U, for
Fontenot] In 2011, 0.307/0.362/0.401 in 446 FSL AB (32-38 in SB).  2011 FSL postseason allstar team. Injured in 2012. 

128.   LHRP Nathan Dorris 6’3” 185 Lbs (199012) [2012-17, Southern Illinois] FB velocity fluctuates but can reach 90-91.  When pitching well also has effective curveball. 13/7 K/W in 14 NWL IP (0.235 BAA).  Late round steal (BA?)

129.   3B/1B Jacob Rogers 6’5” 195 Lbs L/R (198908) [2012-40, Mt. Olive college] Dominated as expected versus much younger pitchers in AZL (0.999 OPS) but followed with surprising 0.300/0.493/0.420 in 69 MWL PA. 14/19 K/W in MWL.  Has most pure power of 2012 Cub draftees.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 22, 2012, 10:47:05 pm
Schlecht, Lopez and Hodges.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 22, 2012, 11:56:29 pm
Schlecht/RCrawford/Hodges/Dorris
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 23, 2012, 12:36:35 am
Schlecht, Dorris, E. Crawford, Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 23, 2012, 09:28:16 am
1) Evan Crawford
2) Rogers
3) Rasheed Crawford
4) Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on December 23, 2012, 11:06:39 am
Schlecht means bad in German.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 23, 2012, 11:30:02 am
He should be all right as long as we don't play too many games in Germany.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 23, 2012, 02:12:35 pm
Baseball America is reporting that the Cubs have released RHRP Bryce Shafer, RHRP Pete Levitt, and LHSwing Willengton Cruz
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 23, 2012, 03:19:07 pm
Man, has Wellington Cruz stock dropped in the last 12 months. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 23, 2012, 03:31:24 pm
Maybe he fell off a physical cliff.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 23, 2012, 03:52:48 pm
Maybe he fell off a physical cliff.
Worthy of Playtwo!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on December 23, 2012, 04:19:03 pm
And that's saying something!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 23, 2012, 04:30:20 pm
I...am...so...honored.

I'm in tears right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on December 23, 2012, 04:40:36 pm
Seems like you both considered that a compliment.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on December 23, 2012, 05:14:15 pm
Ooops.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 23, 2012, 05:37:07 pm
I...am...so...honored.

I'm in tears right now.

Most of what you post brings tears to our eyes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 23, 2012, 07:49:29 pm
Once again vote for up to 5.

110.   LHRP Hunter Cervenka 6’1” 215 Lbs (199001) [2008-27, acq mid-2012 from BoSox] In 2012, 71/33 K/W in 62 IP in SAL/MWL & FSL (0.252 BAA) Promoted to FSL after pitching well in Cub debut at PEO.  Ok thereafter.

111.   SS/2B Jenner Emeterio 6’1” 170 Lbs (199303) In 2012, 0.281.0.374/0.394 in 189 DSL PA. 

112.   LHRP Casey Harman 6'1" 210 Lbs (198903) (2010-29, Clemson) In 2012, 43/11 K/W in 55 SL IP but 0.300 BAA and 10 HRA.

113.   LF/RF Yasiel Balaguert 6’2” 215 Lbs R/R (199301) (Cuba via DR, 2012; $400K).  Put up mediocre numbers in AZL (0.235 BA) followed by pathetic numbers in MWL. 0.208 BA with no power (0.054 ISO) or batting eye (only 5 walks).  Still young.

114.   CF/LF Roberto Caro 6’0” 185 Lbs S/R (199309) [DO-2011] In 2012, 0.314/0.418/0.403 in 223 DSL PA. 15/23 SB. 29/32 K/W.

115.   CF/RF Kelvin Encarnacion 6'0" 175 Lbs S/R (199111) In 2012, repeated DSL again, but did post encouraging 0.308/0.447/0.465 line in 211 DSL PA.

116.   RHRP Austin Reed 6'3" 200 Lbs (199110) [2010-12, CA HS] Stuff exceeds performance. In 2012, moved to bullpen and posted better numbers, 49/24 K/W in 61 MWL IP (0.283 BAA).

117.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

118.   RF/LF/CF Garrett Schlecht 6'2" 198 Lb L/L (199302) [2011-09, Illinois HS; $235K (highest ever for 9th round?)] In 2012, 0.252/0.359/0.345 in 139 AZL PA. 32-40 in SB.

119.   CF/LF Rashad Crawford 6’3” 185 Lbs S/R (199310) [2012-11, GA HS] 0.167/0.324/0.167 in 37 AZL PA.  Plus plus speed.

120.   CF? Evan Crawford 6'1" 165 Lbs R/R (198808) [2009-09(Giants), Indiana U, for
Fontenot] In 2011, 0.307/0.362/0.401 in 446 FSL AB (32-38 in SB).  2011 FSL postseason allstar team. Injured in 2012. 

121.   LHRP Nathan Dorris 6’3” 185 Lbs (199012) [2012-17, Southern Illinois] FB velocity fluctuates but can reach 90-91.  When pitching well also has effective curveball. 13/7 K/W in 14 NWL IP (0.235 BAA).  Late round steal (BA?)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 23, 2012, 08:23:44 pm
Rogers didn't make the cut?
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 23, 2012, 08:58:15 pm
Caro/Reed/Hodges/Schlecht/RCrawford
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 23, 2012, 09:37:56 pm
Rogers didn't make the cut?

I say we give him a write-in vote.

Rogers.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 23, 2012, 11:55:16 pm
Cervenka, Harmon and Hodges.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 24, 2012, 12:16:11 am
Caro, Schlecht, Dorris, Hodges, E. Crawford
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 24, 2012, 08:20:36 am
Cervenka, Cervenka and Cervenka
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on December 24, 2012, 09:51:57 am
Truthfully what are you all doing and who is this cat that's getting you to do it?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 24, 2012, 11:15:15 am
Truthfully what are you all doing and who is this cat that's getting you to do it?

Ranking the Cubs' top 161 prospects by consensus. It'll get more interesting when we get into the top 30 or 40.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on December 24, 2012, 11:40:02 am
I wouldn't mind seeing the Cubs give Chad Jones a shot....LH power pitcher who was drafted by NY Giants a few years back in football but had a life threatening auto accident where he almost lost his leg a couple months after.

One of best athletes I've seen come through LSU on the football field, and could have been a pretty good baseball player if he concentrated on it.  Not sure he'll ever have the speed to play football again, but i'd think his great athleticism would give him a chance to be a potential major league bullpen arm.  He pitched and was an important piece on LSU's last championship baseball team only a couple days after throwing his first bullpen session since high school.  He came in during the clinching game after Anthony Ranaudo and was lights out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 24, 2012, 06:37:44 pm
We are deciding who the Cubs should keep, and which they should release.  And the Cat is the screen name for Theo Epstein.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 24, 2012, 06:42:32 pm
Oh, is that what we're doing?  I thought we were voting on the biggest Johnsons and I've been waiting for Jiggy's input so I could make intelligent votes.  Well, maybe "intelligent" is not an operative word here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on December 24, 2012, 08:54:38 pm
I didnt even go to a Smokies game last year and the people I knew there are gone now. I dont have anymore insight than any of the rest of you. I dont have time to go to those games if Im gonna coach and I prefer coaching. I dont know who has the biggest pecker now but if I where a betting man I'd say Junior Lake.

And Ill start voting on this thing when we get to the good prospects.

Merry Christmas everyone.

Ive been a part of this place for many years and I couldnt imagine following this team without you all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 27, 2012, 02:49:46 pm
Hope your holiday/XMAS season is going well.

Today's list. Based on two requests, I've added Rogers back in;  He lost in a tie breaker last week (my vote).

Vote for up to 5.

103.   LF/1B Trevor Gretzky 6'4" 190 Lbs L/L (199209) [2011-07, CA HS] No power yet.  0.304 BA, 0.372 OBP, and 0.026 ISO in 127 AZL PA.

104.   RHRP Hayden Simpson 6'0" 170 Lbs (198905) [2010-01, Southern Ark] [2012 BA 29] 0.325 BAA and 16/29 K/W (38 IP) led to 2-step demotion from FSL to NWL. 47/22 K/W in NWL with 0.276 BAA (43 IP).

105.   RHRP Luis Liria 6'2" 170 Lbs (199001) [2007-DO] In 2012, 52/46 K/W in 59 MWL IP (0.242 BAA).

106.   RHRP Ryan Searle 6'0" 190 Lbs (198906) [2007-Australia] Mediocre year. In 2012,17/11 KW in 24.1 SL IP (0.277 BAA).  Demoted to FSL where 49/20 K/W in 59.2 IP (0.257 BAA).

107.   RHRP Jin-Young Kim 6'1" 190 Lbs (199204) [2010, Korea, $850K] In 2012, 14/4 K/W in 17 AZL IP (0.250 BAA).

108.   RHRP Eddie Orozco 6’2” 195 Lbs (198904) [2012-22, UC Riverside] 31/11 K/W in 27 NWL IP (19 HAA). Signed as 5th year senior.

109.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] {86:0.20} $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.

110.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

111.   LHRP Hunter Cervenka 6’1” 215 Lbs (199001) [2008-27, acq mid-2012 from BoSox] In 2012, 71/33 K/W in 62 IP in SAL/MWL & FSL (0.252 BAA) Promoted to FSL after pitching well in Cub debut at PEO.  Ok thereafter.

112.   RF/LF/CF Garrett Schlecht 6'2" 198 Lb L/L (199302) [2011-09, Illinois HS; $235K (highest ever for 9th round?)] In 2012, 0.252/0.359/0.345 in 139 AZL PA. 32-40 in SB.

113.   CF/LF Roberto Caro 6’0” 185 Lbs S/R (199309) [DO-2011] In 2012, 0.314/0.418/0.403 in 223 DSL PA. 15/23 SB. 29/32 K/W.

114.   RHRP Austin Reed 6'3" 200 Lbs (199110) [2010-12, CA HS] Stuff exceeds performance. In 2012, moved to bullpen and posted better numbers, 49/24 K/W in 61 MWL IP (0.283 BAA).

115.   3B/1B Jacob Rogers 6’5” 195 Lbs L/R (198908) [2012-40, Mt. Olive college] Dominated as expected versus much younger pitchers in AZL (0.999 OPS) but followed with surprising 0.300/0.493/0.420 in 69 MWL PA. 14/19 K/W in MWL.  Has most pure power of 2012 Cub draftees.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 27, 2012, 03:12:32 pm
Hodges and Rogers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on December 27, 2012, 03:54:26 pm
Liria has a pretty decent arm, so I'll vote for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 27, 2012, 04:37:40 pm
Orozco, Schlecht, Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 27, 2012, 05:06:08 pm
1) Rogers
2) Gtetzky
3) Hodges
4) Caro

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 27, 2012, 05:20:51 pm
Cervenka, Hodges and Contreras.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on December 27, 2012, 08:52:35 pm
I agree that we shouldn't count the Gretsky kid out...at least as a trade piece down the road...that kind of bloodline IS rather meaningful.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 27, 2012, 10:16:52 pm
I agree that we shouldn't count the Gretsky kid out...at least as a trade piece down the road...that kind of bloodline IS rather meaningful.



Yeah, it meant wonders for Roberto Clemente, Jr., Pete Rose, Jr., and Carl Yastrzemski, Jr.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 28, 2012, 10:51:22 am
And Berry Bonds.  And Dale Berra.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 28, 2012, 11:20:32 am
No wonder Barry Bonds won't get in the HOF.  Even Dave can't spell his name.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 28, 2012, 12:28:25 pm
Moran.  You are talking about Barry Bonds.  I am talking about his less successful brother Berry.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on December 28, 2012, 01:38:53 pm
Yeah, it meant wonders for Roberto Clemente, Jr., Pete Rose, Jr., and Carl Yastrzemski, Jr.
and jes ass jr
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 28, 2012, 04:18:55 pm
Today's list of prospects. Vote for up to 5.


96.   LF/RF Bijan Rademacher 6’0” 200 Lbs  L/L (199106)  [2012-13, CA CC] Two way prospect who touches mid90s with FB.  In 2012, 0.977 OPS in 55 NWL PA followed by 0.575 OPS in 132 MWL PA.  0.271 OPS vs LHP in MWL.

97.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

98.   C Neftali Rosario R/R 5'11" 193 lbs (199307) [2011-06, Puerto Rico] In 2011, put up 0.842 OPS in 108 AZL PA.  In 2012, 0.584 OPS in 47 AZL PA.  Injured?

99.   RHRP Casey Weathers 6’1” 205 Lbs (198506) [2007-01(Rockies), Vanderbilt] [2012 Cubs BA 27] No control and poor K/IP since TJ surgery in late 2008. 29/53 K/W in 34 PCL IP (0.208 BAA).

100.   LHRP Brian Smith 6'0" 170 Lbs (199212) [2011-40, Ontario HS] After starting in 2011, spent 2012 in bullpen where he put up excellent numbers in limited AZL/NWL innings. Overall, 22/10 K/W in 23 IP (0.163 BAA).

101.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

102.   RHRP Oswaldo Martinez 6'0" 180 Lbs (198809) [2006-MEX] In 2012, 42/15 K/W in 56 Mexican league IP (0.350 BAA).  Still with Cubs?

103.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

104.   LF/1B Trevor Gretzky 6'4" 190 Lbs L/L (199209) [2011-07, CA HS] No power yet.  0.304 BA, 0.372 OBP, and 0.026 ISO in 127 AZL PA.

105.   3B/1B Jacob Rogers 6’5” 195 Lbs L/R (198908) [2012-40, Mt. Olive college] Dominated as expected versus much younger pitchers in AZL (0.999 OPS) but followed with surprising 0.300/0.493/0.420 in 69 MWL PA. 14/19 K/W in MWL.  Has most pure power of 2012 Cub draftees.

106.   RF/LF/CF Garrett Schlecht 6'2" 198 Lb L/L (199302) [2011-09, Illinois HS; $235K (when signed was highest ever for 9th round)] In 2012, 0.252/0.359/0.345 in 139 AZL PA. 32-40 in SB.

107.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 28, 2012, 04:22:46 pm
Rademacher, Rosario, Hodges, Rogers
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 28, 2012, 04:38:33 pm
Rademacher/Rodriguez/Torrez/Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 28, 2012, 05:43:14 pm
Carlos A. Rodriguez, Daury Torrez, Willson Contreras, Garrett Schlecht, Jesse Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 28, 2012, 06:48:25 pm
1) Carlos Rodriguez
2) Daury Torrez
3) Jesse Hodges
4) Trevor Gretzky
5) Jacob Rogers
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 28, 2012, 07:07:00 pm
Roserio and Contreras
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 29, 2012, 05:35:51 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 5.

89.   RF Johermyn Chavez 6’3” 225 Lbs R/R (198901) [2005-VE, signed as miFA Nov2012]  Posted 0.964 in 2010 in extreme hitters park (High Desert) but has struggled since. In 2012, 0.232/0.339/0.386 in 281 SL PA.

90.   CF/RF Taiwan Easterling 5'11" 195 Lbs R/R (198902) [2011-27] [2012 Cubs BA 28] First full season had disappointing results. 0.243/0.316/0.366 in 289 MWL PA. 18/28 in SB. 0.624 OPS vs. RHP.

91.   2B Frandy De La Rosa 6’1” 180 Lbs S/R (1995??) [2012, DR; $700K]  #19 International Prospect in 2012 (Baseball America). Switch hitting line drive hitter with simple short swing and quick hands.  Position TBD. Likely lacks range and arm to play SS

92.   3B/1B/LF Greg Rohan 6'0" 205 Lbs R/R (198605) [2009-21,Kent St] In 2012, 0.282/0.349/0.491 in 536 PA in FSL, SL, and PCL. 2012 mid-season FSL allstar. Veteran utilityman with a bat.

93.   SS/2B Elliot Soto 5'9" 160 Lbs R/R (198908) [2010-15, Creighton U] In 2012, 0.220/0.310/0.282 in 236 SL PA. Weak bat but solid glove.

94.   C Chadd Krist 5’11” 190 lbs R/R (199001) [2012-09, U California; $130K] Senior sign with good athleticism and strong arm. Suspect bat but hit 0.253/0.324/0.447 in 165 MWL PA after 62 NWL PA.

95.   RHRP Chad Martin 6’7” 230 Lbs  (199005)  [2012-10, Indiana U; $125K] In 2012, 17/9 K/W in 16 AZL IP (17 HAA).  Low 90s FB when used for short stints.  Curveball and slider lack consistency. Questionable control.

96.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

97.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

98.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

99.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

100.   C Neftali Rosario R/R 5'11" 193 lbs (199307) [2011-06, Puerto Rico] In 2011, put up 0.842 OPS in 108 AZL PA.  In 2012, 0.584 OPS in 47 AZL PA.  Injured much of 2012. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 29, 2012, 05:54:02 pm
Rodriguez, Torrez, Contreras, De La Rosa, Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 29, 2012, 06:23:38 pm
Wow.  Lost most of my guys.

Hodges, C. Rodriguez, Torrez, Rosario, De La Rosa
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 29, 2012, 06:44:08 pm
Contreras and Rosario
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 29, 2012, 07:24:38 pm
Wow.  Lost most of my guys

Heh, heh, me too.  (OK votes in my heart, even if I haven't often written them out)

DeLaRosa
Rodriguez
Contreras
Hodges
Torrez
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 29, 2012, 07:39:04 pm
Rodriguez, Torrez, Contreras, De La Rosa, Hodges

Craig, I'm flattered that you liked all five of my guys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 29, 2012, 07:52:03 pm
1) Carlos Rodriguez
2) Daury Torrez
3) Jesse Hodges
4) Frandy De La Rosa
5) Chadd Krist
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 29, 2012, 08:56:20 pm
DeLaRosa/Hodges/Rodriguez/Torrez/Easterling
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 29, 2012, 08:58:30 pm
Craig, I'm flattered that you liked all five of my guys.

Heh heh, funny! You've got good taste.  I don't actually remember how this game works.  If we both voted for them, will that be enough votes to keep all five on the next round? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 29, 2012, 11:05:16 pm
I don't know what the rules are, but Rodriguez and Torrez were under consideration for my top 30. The only reason they didn't make it was that they were so young, still in the Dominican Republic and so far away from MLB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 29, 2012, 11:18:12 pm
The rules are quite simple.  Dallen counts up all the votes, and then picks the guys he chooses.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 30, 2012, 06:32:59 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 5.

Are you happy with this bowling type format or would a NCAA basketball type format be preferable for the final rounds?

82.   LHRP Zach Rosscup 6'2" 205 Lbs (198806) [2009-28 (TB), Oregon CC] In 2012, struggled with control but hard to hit 29/19 K/W in 22.1 SL IP (0.179 BAA).  Late season arm concerns kept him out of AFL.

83.   CF/2B/RF/LF Rubi Silva 5'11" 180 Lb L/R (198906) [2010, Cuba, $1Mill] In 2012, 0.302/0.322/0.412 in 433 FSL PA. 0.263/0.277/0.413 in82 SL PA. Spending fall 2012 in AFL.

84.   RHSwing Jay Jackson 6'1" 195 Lbs (198710) [2008-09, Furman] [2011 Cubs BA15, BP09]  76/43 K/W in 86 PCL IP (0.309 BAA).  Spent 3rd full season in AAA with each year a bit worse than the one before

85.   SS/3B Tim Saunders 6’0’ 180 Lbs R/R (19905) [2012-32, Marietta College] In 2012, Dominated D-III, leading division in total bases, runs and hits.  Ceiling is fleet footed ML UT. Early returns suggest he could reach ceiling: 1.222 OPS in 76 AZL PA, 0.743 OPS in 46 FSL PA, & 0.862 OPS in 89 MWL PA.  5th best debut of college players (BA)

86.   RHSP Alexander Santana 6'2" 170 lb (199310) [2010-DR] In 2012, 51/14 K/W in 59 DSL IP (0.231 BAA). 87-91 mph FB with above-avg sink and a good curve ball for his age.

87.   3B Mark Malave 6'3" 185 Lbs S/R (199501) [2011-VZ] $1.6M bonus.  In 2012 debut, 0.229/0.328/0.278 in 259 DSL PA.

88.   RF/LF Oliver Zapata 5'9" 180 Lbs S/R (199209) [DO]  In 2012, Still young but powerless speedster did not reach base enough in full-season debut. 0.225/0.305/0.282 in 409 MWL PA. Only 19/32 in SB attempts.

89.   2B Frandy De La Rosa 6’1” 180 Lbs S/R (1995??) [2012, DR; $700K]  #19 International Prospect in 2012 (Baseball America). Switch hitting line drive hitter with simple short swing and quick hands.  Position TBD. Likely lacks range and arm to play SS

90.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

91.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

92.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

93.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on December 30, 2012, 06:43:56 pm
Rodriguez, Torres, De La Rosa, and Hodges
(I think this is the last time I can vote for Hodges.  He's in rarefied air now.)
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on December 30, 2012, 06:45:36 pm
Saunders/Santana/Rodriguez/Torrez/Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 30, 2012, 07:38:50 pm
Saunders, Zapata and Contreras.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on December 30, 2012, 08:41:58 pm
Rodriguez, Torrez, De La Rosa, Contreras, Hodges
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on December 30, 2012, 08:46:55 pm
Rosscup, DelaRosa, Rodriguez, Santana, Torrez
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 30, 2012, 09:40:58 pm
1) Rubi Silva
2) Carlos Rodriguez
3) Daury Torrez
4) Jesse Hodges
5) Frandy De La Rosa
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on December 30, 2012, 09:41:12 pm
Saunders and also Saunders. plus Saunders.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on December 31, 2012, 06:49:36 pm
Vote for up to 7 today.

75.   LF/CF/RF John Andreoli 6'1" 215 Lbs R/R (199006) [2011-17, UCONN] Solid debut for powerless on-base machine with plus speed and good genes.  In 2012, 0.289 BA (0.402 OBP) in 487 FSL PA (54 SB).  2012 FSL postseason all-star.

76.   3B/1B Dustin Geiger 6'2" 180 Lbs R/R (199112) [2010-24, Fl HS] In 2012, 0.251/0.301/0.465 in 382 MWL PA.  79/20 K/W.

77.   RHRP Blake Parker 6'3" 225 Lbs (198506) [2006-16, Arkansas] (BA-20) In 2012, 22/6 K/W in 23 PCL IP (0.190 BAA) but 6/5 K/W in 6 ML IP (0.370 BAA). Missed middle of season with stress reaction in right elbow

78.   RHRP Kevin Rhoderick 6'1" 190 Lbs (198808) [2010-09, Oregon St] In 2012, Repeated AA but already shaky control worsened.  53/47 K/W in 57 IP (0.230).  Showed much better control in 9 AZL IP (14/2 K/W). Best slider in system (BA2012)

79.   LF Ricardo Marcano 6'2" 187 Lbs L/R (199410) [2011-VZ; $400K]. In 2012, 0.245/0.350/0.332 in 254 DSL PA. Projects to hit for average & power.  Average speed and hands.

80.   RHRP Brian Schlitter 6'5" 235 Lbs (198512) [2007-16(Phils) College of Charleston] After missing 2011 with elbow issues, in 2012, posted solid 63/13 K/W in 69 IP between the FSL and SL. 0.262 BAA.

81.   CF/RF Jeffrey Baez 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (199310) [VZ] In 2012, 0.291/0.378/0.448 in 190 in DSL PA. 28/37 SB. 35/18 K/W.  Earned Aug cup of coffee with AZL Cubs.  Athletic projectable body.  Fleet runner with average arm.

82.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

83.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

84.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

85.   2B Frandy De La Rosa 6’1” 180 Lbs S/R (1995??) [2012, DR; $700K]  #19 International Prospect in 2012 (Baseball America). Switch hitting line drive hitter with simple short swing and quick hands.  Position TBD. Likely lacks range and arm to play SS

86.   SS/3B Tim Saunders 6’0’ 180 Lbs R/R (19905) [2012-32, Marietta College] In 2012, Dominated D-III, leading division in total bases, runs and hits.  Ceiling is fleet footed ML UT. Early returns suggest he could reach ceiling: 1.222 OPS in 76 AZL PA, 0.743 OPS in 46 FSL PA, & 0.862 OPS in 89 MWL PA.  5th best debut of college players (BA)

87.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

88.   RHSP Alexander Santana 6'2" 170 lb (199310) [2010-DR] In 2012, 51/14 K/W in 59 DSL IP (0.231 BAA). 87-91 mph FB with above-avg sink and a good curve ball for his age.

89.   CF/2B/RF/LF Rubi Silva 5'11" 180 Lb L/R (198906) [2010, Cuba, $1Mill] In 2012, 0.302/0.322/0.412 in 433 FSL PA. 0.263/0.277/0.413 in82 SL PA. Spending fall 2012 in AFL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 31, 2012, 07:17:33 pm
Geiger

Rhoderick

Saunders

Contreras
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on December 31, 2012, 07:46:32 pm
1) John Andreoli
2) Jeffrey Baez
3) Carlos Rodriguez
4) Daury Torrez
5) Tim Saunders
6) Rubi Silva
7) RHSP Alexander Santana


Schlitter and Santana both look like the kind of pitchers who avoid walking hitters and are likely to get a shot from the Theocracy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on December 31, 2012, 08:27:07 pm
Does anyone know what the current stuff is of Schlitter.  Before his injury, he had a fastball that could hit 98.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on December 31, 2012, 08:32:59 pm
The only way Brian Schlitter's fastball could hit 98 mph is if he threw it while traveling in a car.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 01, 2013, 02:57:58 am
Rodriguez, Torrez, Contreras, De La Rosa, Hodges, J. Baez, Santana
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 01, 2013, 08:02:42 am
Torrez, Hodges, De La Rosa
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 01, 2013, 08:47:38 am
DeLaRosa
Rodriguez
Contreras
Santana
Torres

Pretty much Cubsin's list again. 

I tend towards a) going with scouting, until failing problems manifest, b) figuring money and scouting go together, c) preferring a distant very young pitcher with nice numbers over a distant young player, d) preferring a distant young international player who wasn't drafted over an American who was seen but not drafted very high.  Pitchers can mature into velocity at unpredictable times, and can learn new breaking balls, so can unexpectedly end up with good tools.  But players, limited tools rarely change. 
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 01, 2013, 09:28:57 am
Andreoli/Baez/Rodriguez/Torrez/Hodges/Saunders/Santana
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 01, 2013, 09:34:54 am
Sutcliffe, Eckersley, Sanderson, Trout, Ruthven.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 01, 2013, 06:59:19 pm
Sutcliffe, Eckersley, Sanderson, Trout, Ruthven.

Not surprised.  He's been acting more senile lately.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 01, 2013, 07:03:06 pm
Today's list of prospects; Vote for up to 8.

68.   RHSP Patrick Francescon 5'11" 185 Lbs (198901) [2011-40, Trevecca Nazarene] Became starter in 2012, Dominating 42/14 K/W & 0.155 BAA in 52 MWL IP followed by 53/24 K/W in 84 FSL IP (0.257 BAA).

69.   RHSwing Trey Lang 6’3” 230 Lbs (199205) [2012-06, AZ  CC; $193K] Big framed kid who began 2012 as college OF, became closer/OF and was drafted by Cubs to be pitcher. Featured low 90s FB when began closing but slipped into U80s by end of season.   11/2 K/W in 13 AZL IP (16 HAA).

70.   RHSwing Ty'Relle Harris 6'4" 235 Lb (198612) [2009-19, UTenn] In 2012, 67/39 K/W in 82 IP between FSL, SL, & PCL (0.242 BAA).

71.   RHRP Frank Batista 5'10" 170 lb (198904) [2009-DO] In 2012, 39/21 K/W in 52 SL IP (0.199 BAA). Hit hard during 7 inning PCL stint. SL mid-season allstar.

72.   LHSP Anthony Prieto 5’11” 170 Lbs (199311) [2012-05, TX HS; $257K] Touched mid 90s last summer but forearm strain limited his velocity to the upper 80s this spring.  Hard to hit when he found the strike zone this summer (0.145 BAA with 11/12 K/W in 19 AZL IP).

73.   SS Luis Enrique Acosta 6'1" 180 Lb R/R (199411) [2011-DO; $1.1M] 0.197/0.293/0.300 in 228 DSL PA. Top Cubs middle IF prospect in DSL. Projection exceeds performance. Should repeat DSL in 2013.

74.   LHRP Michael Heesch 6’5” 245 Lbs (199005) [2012-08, SC-Beaufort; $139K] 19/1 K/W in 23 NWL IP (0.258 BAA).  90ish FB and fringy slider/chaneup.  NWL “sleeper” (Conor Glassey, BA)

75.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

76.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

77.   RHSP Alexander Santana 6'2" 170 lb (199310) [2010-DR] In 2012, 51/14 K/W in 59 DSL IP (0.231 BAA). 87-91 mph FB with above-avg sink and a good curve ball for his age.

78.   CF/RF Jeffrey Baez 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (199310) [VZ] In 2012, 0.291/0.378/0.448 in 190 in DSL PA. 28/37 SB. 35/18 K/W.  Earned Aug cup of coffee with AZL Cubs.  Athletic projectable body.  Fleet runner with average arm.

79.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

80.   2B Frandy De La Rosa 6’1” 180 Lbs S/R (1995??) [2012, DR; $700K]  #19 International Prospect in 2012 (Baseball America). Switch hitting line drive hitter with simple short swing and quick hands.  Position TBD. Likely lacks range and arm to play SS

81.   SS/3B Tim Saunders 6’0’ 180 Lbs R/R (19905) [2012-32, Marietta College] In 2012, Dominated D-III, leading division in total bases, runs and hits.  Ceiling is fleet footed ML UT. Early returns suggest he could reach ceiling: 1.222 OPS in 76 AZL PA, 0.743 OPS in 46 FSL PA, & 0.862 OPS in 89 MWL PA.  5th best debut of college players (BA)

82.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

83.   LF/CF/RF John Andreoli 6'1" 215 Lbs R/R (199006) [2011-17, UCONN] Solid debut for powerless on-base machine with plus speed and good genes.  In 2012, 0.289 BA (0.402 OBP) in 487 FSL PA (54 SB).  2012 FSL postseason all-star.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 01, 2013, 07:43:20 pm
Prieto
DeLaRosa
Lang
Rodriguez
Contreras
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 01, 2013, 07:53:06 pm
Contreras, Saunders
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 01, 2013, 07:53:48 pm
Francescon
Prieto
DeLaRosa
Rodriguez
Saunders
Torrez
Hodges
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 01, 2013, 09:56:50 pm
Same 7 as yesterday, plus Acosta
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 01, 2013, 10:31:45 pm
1) Jeffrey Baez
2) John Andreoli
3) Patrick Francescon
4) Michael Heesch
5) Carlos Rodriguez
6) Daury Torrez
7) Tim Saunders
8 ) Alexander Santana

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 02, 2013, 12:04:19 am
Rodriguez, Harris, Lang, Torrez, Santana, Francescon, Contreras, Jeffrey Baez
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on January 02, 2013, 05:12:36 pm
Tim Saunders
Anthony Prieto
Frandy De La Rosa
Wilson Contreras
Carlos Rodriguez
Jeffrey Baez
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 02, 2013, 07:01:40 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 9.


61.   RHSP Jose Arias 6'5" 220 Lbs (199101) [DO] Mid 90s FB but secondary pitches need work. After spending 2011 in DSL posted 46/19 K/W in 63 NWL IP (0.258 BAA) in 2012.

62.   RHRP Marcus Hatley 6'5" 220 Lb (198803) [2006-39, CA CC(d+f)] [2012 Cubs BA 26] In 2012, 46/20 K/W in 45 SL IP (36 HAA) followed by 18/10 K/W in 15 PCL IP (14 HAA but 8.22 ERA).

63.   LHSwing Jeffry Antigua 6'1" 170 lbs (199006) [2006-DO] In 2012, Excellent 40/13 K/W in 40.0 SL IP (0.270 BAA) followed by 38/11 K/W in 41.0 MWL IP (0.217 BAA).  Solid FB.

64.   RHSwing Lendy Castillo 6’1” 170 Lbs (198904) [2007-DR] Rule 5 pick who pitched more 2012 innings in minors rehabbing groin injury than in majors.  In 2011 46/16 K/W in 46 IP (0.220 BAA) high A IP. Got shelled in limited 2012 ML IP (12/9 K/W in 12 IP, 0.390 BAA).

65.   LF/RF Reggie Golden 5'10" 210 lbs R/R(199110) [2010-02] [2012 Cubs BA 17] Tore ACL and missed most of 2012 (28 official AB) [2011 Cubs BA23, BP08]  Explosive power when/if he makes contact. Above average speed. 

66.   1B Justin Bour 6'4" 250 Lbs L/R (198805) [2009-25, GMU] In 2012, impressive 0.283/0.360/0.455 line (17 HR) in 568 SL PA. 0.842 OPS vs RHP. SL post-season allstar

67.   LHRP Hunter Ackerman 6'1" 190 Lbs (199010) [2010-04, NC JC] 88-91 MPH FB that induces ground balls and advanced-change up. In 2012, 28/11 K/W in 22.1 NWL IP (27 HAA).

68.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

69.   SS/3B Tim Saunders 6’0’ 180 Lbs R/R (19905) [2012-32, Marietta College] In 2012, Dominated D-III, leading division in total bases, runs and hits.  Ceiling is fleet footed ML UT. Early returns suggest he could reach ceiling: 1.222 OPS in 76 AZL PA, 0.743 OPS in 46 FSL PA, & 0.862 OPS in 89 MWL PA.  5th best debut of college players (BA)

70.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

71.   CF/RF Jeffrey Baez 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (199310) [VZ] In 2012, 0.291/0.378/0.448 in 190 in DSL PA. 28/37 SB. 35/18 K/W.  Earned Aug cup of coffee with AZL Cubs.  Athletic projectable body.  Fleet runner with average arm.

72.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

73.   RHSP Patrick Francescon 5'11" 185 Lbs (198901) [2011-40, Trevecca Nazarene] Became starter in 2012, Dominating 42/14 K/W & 0.155 BAA in 52 MWL IP followed by 53/24 K/W in 84 FSL IP (0.257 BAA).

74.   RHSP Alexander Santana 6'2" 170 lb (199310) [2010-DR] In 2012, 51/14 K/W in 59 DSL IP (0.231 BAA). 87-91 mph FB with above-avg sink and a good curve ball for his age.

75.   LHSP Anthony Prieto 5’11” 170 Lbs (199311) [2012-05, TX HS; $257K] Touched mid 90s last summer but forearm strain limited his velocity to the upper 80s this spring.  Hard to hit when he found the strike zone this summer (0.145 BAA with 11/12 K/W in 19 AZL IP).

76.   2B Frandy De La Rosa 6’1” 180 Lbs S/R (1995??) [2012, DR; $700K]  #19 International Prospect in 2012 (Baseball America). Switch hitting line drive hitter with simple short swing and quick hands.  Position TBD. Likely lacks range and arm to play SS

77.   RHSwing Trey Lang 6’3” 230 Lbs (199205) [2012-06, AZ  CC; $193K] Big framed kid who began 2012 as college OF, became closer/OF and was drafted by Cubs to be pitcher. Featured low 90s FB when began closing but slipped into U80s by end of season.   11/2 K/W in 13 AZL IP (16 HAA).

78.   LF/CF/RF John Andreoli 6'1" 215 Lbs R/R (199006) [2011-17, UCONN] Solid debut for powerless on-base machine with plus speed and good genes.  In 2012, 0.289 BA (0.402 OBP) in 487 FSL PA (54 SB).  2012 FSL postseason all-star.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 02, 2013, 07:19:39 pm
Rodriguez, Castillo, Torrez, Contreras, Santana, Francescon, Lang, Saunders, De La Rosa
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 02, 2013, 08:36:48 pm
Arias, Golden, Rodriguez, Saunders, Torrez, Baez, Santana, Prieto
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 02, 2013, 10:07:15 pm
Arias, Castillo and Contreras
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 02, 2013, 11:08:18 pm
1) Lendy Castillo
2) Jeffrey Baez
3) John Andreoli
4) Jose Arias
5) Jeffry Antigua
6) Carlos Rodriguez
7) Daury Torrez
8) Tim Saunders
9) Alexander Santana

Hate to leave Bour off the list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 03, 2013, 08:58:57 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 10.

54.   LHSP Gerardo Concepcion 6’2” 180 Lbs (199202) [2012, CU, $6M 5-yr ML] Displayed solid 3 pitch mix as amateur in Cuba but struggled with velocity & command after signing with Cubs. In MWL, 70H in 52 IP (0.329 BAA) with 30/28 K/W.

55.   CF/LF Shawon Dunston Jr. 6'2" 175 Lbs  L/R (199302) [2011-11, HS] [2012 Cubs BA 30] In 2012, 0.577 OPS  in 69 NWL PA earned demotion to AZL where he did much better: 0.286/0.357/0.410 in 185 PA. Average speed and arm.

56.   C Justin Marra 5'11" 180 Lbs L/R (199301) [2011-15, Toronto HS].  Good receiver with solid arm.    0.322/0.457/0.467 line in 111 AZL PA. Impressive line but injury kept sample size small.

57.   RHRP Carlos Gutierrez 6’3” 230 Lbs (198609) [2008-01, U Miami] [2012 Twins BA-17] Possessed “electric” heavy FB when drafted but arm issues (requiring surgery in summer 2012) and lack of command have slowed his progress. In 2012, 20/3 K/W in 16 AAA IP (0.217 BAA). 

58.   RHRP AJ Morris 6'2" 185 Lbs (198612) [2009-04 (Nats for Gorz), KSU] [2011 BA18(Nats)]. After missing 2011 with shoulder injury posted 42/15 K/W in 52 FSL IP (0.189 BAA!).  Ground ball pitcher.

59.   LHSP Chris Rusin 6'2" 185 Lbs (198610) [2009-04, UKentucky] HR-prone soft-thrower who posted solid 0.267 BAA in 140 PCL IP with 94/53 K. 9/6 KW in 11 MLB IP (0.318 BAA).

60.   RHSP Dallas Beeler 6'5" 205 lbs (198906) [2010-41, Oral Roberts] [2012 Cubs BA 12] Regressed in 2012 as K rate plummeted, 70/48 K/W in 136 SL IP (166 HAA, 0.305 BAA).

61.   RHSP Jose Arias 6'5" 220 Lbs (199101) [DO] Mid 90s FB but secondary pitches need work. After spending 2011 in DSL posted 46/19 K/W in 63 NWL IP (0.258 BAA) in 2012.

62.   RHSwing Lendy Castillo 6’1” 170 Lbs (198904) [2007-DR] Rule 5 pick who pitched more 2012 innings in minors rehabbing groin injury than in majors.  In 2011 46/16 K/W in 46 IP (0.220 BAA) high A IP. Got shelled in limited 2012 ML IP (12/9 K/W in 12 IP, 0.390 BAA).

63.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

64.   SS/3B Tim Saunders 6’0’ 180 Lbs R/R (19905) [2012-32, Marietta College] In 2012, Dominated D-III, leading division in total bases, runs and hits.  Ceiling is fleet footed ML UT. Early returns suggest he could reach ceiling: 1.222 OPS in 76 AZL PA, 0.743 OPS in 46 FSL PA, & 0.862 OPS in 89 MWL PA.  5th best debut of college players (BA)

65.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

66.   RHSP Alexander Santana 6'2" 170 lb (199310) [2010-DR] In 2012, 51/14 K/W in 59 DSL IP (0.231 BAA). 87-91 mph FB with above-avg sink and a good curve ball for his age.

67.   CF/RF Jeffrey Baez 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (199310) [VZ] In 2012, 0.291/0.378/0.448 in 190 in DSL PA. 28/37 SB. 35/18 K/W.  Earned Aug cup of coffee with AZL Cubs.  Athletic projectable body.  Fleet runner with average arm.

68.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

69.   LHSP Anthony Prieto 5’11” 170 Lbs (199311) [2012-05, TX HS; $257K] Touched mid 90s last summer but forearm strain limited his velocity to the upper 80s this spring.  Hard to hit when he found the strike zone this summer (0.145 BAA with 11/12 K/W in 19 AZL IP).

70.   RHSwing Trey Lang 6’3” 230 Lbs (199205) [2012-06, AZ  CC; $193K] Big framed kid who began 2012 as college OF, became closer/OF and was drafted by Cubs to be pitcher. Featured low 90s FB when began closing but slipped into U80s by end of season.   11/2 K/W in 13 AZL IP (16 HAA).

71.   LF/CF/RF John Andreoli 6'1" 215 Lbs R/R (199006) [2011-17, UCONN] Solid debut for powerless on-base machine with plus speed and good genes.  In 2012, 0.289 BA (0.402 OBP) in 487 FSL PA (54 SB).  2012 FSL postseason all-star.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 03, 2013, 11:04:06 pm
Contreras, Arias and Dunston
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 04, 2013, 12:23:43 am

Rodriguez, Castillo, Torrez, Contreras, Marra, Santana, Lang, Arias, Saunders, Dunston
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 04, 2013, 10:03:23 am
Dunston, Marra, Arias, Rodriguez, Saunders, Torrez, Santana, Baez, Prieto
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 04, 2013, 10:08:44 am
1. Lendy Castillo
2. Jeffrey Baez
3. John Andreoli
4. Justin Marra
5. Jose Arias
6. Carlos Rodriguez
7. Daury Torrez
8. Tim Saunders
9. Alexander Santana

I don't see the value in Dunston.  He only has average (or slightly better than average) speed, arm is not good enough for RF, and only acceptable for CF, is raw (which likely means he is not even a good defender), has minimal power, and K's about 20% of the time.  OFers with marginal arms, little power, no meaningful speed, 20% K rates and who are raw have a lot of work needed before they reach the level of not being good enough for AA, and no upside from there.  I know there are family ties, but I don't him going anywhere.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 04, 2013, 10:35:59 am
Dunston is only a marginal prospect at this time (as are all those on the list).  But your description of him doesn't seem to match with what I have heard.

He has much better than average speed (less than his father, but certainly more than Castro or Brett Jackson).  He has a much better than average arm, certainly good enough to play right field (if you consider David DeJesus's arem to be adequate in right field, for instance.)  His arm is not as strong as his father's, but neither is any player in the Cubs system, other than perhaps Lake).  The major question for him is whether he will ever hit for enough contact and power to make it to to the big leagues.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 04, 2013, 11:12:38 am
Dave, that's how I see Dunston too.  His name always attracts comparisons to SR, and of course his arm and speed aren't as good, but there are few arms in any generation that match Shawon's.  Compared to regular prospects, junior's arm and speed seem like they are very good. 

All of his non-hitting tools sound like they are very good, but none of them exceptional enough to make it as:
a.  An overpowering power pitcher, following a conversion to the mound.
b.  A base-stealer supreme
c.  A gold-glove, defensively extraordinary CFer. 

Junior's arm, speed, and defense all sound good, but not superlative enough to create a successful career.  If he makes it, he'll have to hit enough to make it as an outfielder, probably a corner outfielder.  He's got the size/strength/wrists so that he could hit with enough power for a corner.  But he's a long ways away, and having the strength is a lot easier than having the gift for contact. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 04, 2013, 12:15:45 pm
Dunston is only a marginal prospect at this time (as are all those on the list).  But your description of him doesn't seem to match with what I have heard.

He has much better than average speed (less than his father, but certainly more than Castro or Brett Jackson).  He has a much better than average arm, certainly good enough to play right field

55.   CF/LF Shawon Dunston Jr. 6'2" 175 Lbs  L/R (199302) [2011-11, HS] [2012 Cubs BA 30] In 2012, 0.577 OPS  in 69 NWL PA earned demotion to AZL where he did much better: 0.286/0.357/0.410 in 185 PA. Average speed and arm.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 04, 2013, 12:54:03 pm
Well, that is enough proof for me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 04, 2013, 01:30:09 pm
Dave, that's how I see Dunston too.  His name always attracts comparisons to SR, and of course his arm and speed aren't as good, but there are few arms in any generation that match Shawon's.  Compared to regular prospects, junior's arm and speed seem like they are very good. 

I scratched my head for a long time trying to figure out what major leaguer with the initials SR Craig was trying to compare Dunston to...then I realized SR weren't initials, he mean Sr. Senior.  Sheesh.

I did learn that there aren't many great Major Leaguers with the initials SR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 04, 2013, 02:23:09 pm
How many?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 04, 2013, 03:11:33 pm
Sergio Ramirez; Santo, Ron; Sete Rose; Sobin Roberts.  All I could come up with.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 04, 2013, 03:41:30 pm
Well, that is enough proof for me.

I didn't know there was anything to prove.  You said my description of Dunston doesn't seem to match with what I have heard, and all I was doing was pointing to what I based that description on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 04, 2013, 07:43:39 pm
Of course I can't remember where I got that information from.  Baseball America rated his speed and arm as above average last year.  I know I've also heard this arm velocity is much less than you'd expect based on his dad.  I suspect his arm is closer to average than plus based on his time in RF last year (0 games).





Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 04, 2013, 07:53:09 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 11.

49.   SS/2B Carlos Penalver 6'0" 170 Lbs R/R (199405) [2010-VZ, $550K]   In 2012, 0.273/0.341/0.322 in 202 AZL PA.  31/19 K/W and 7/11 in SB. 

50.   LHSP Kyler Burke  6'3" 205 Lbs (198804) [2006-01S as OF, Padres] Mid 90's FB.  Converted OF started for first time in 2012. Struggled after promotion to FSL. 52/22 K/W in 74 MWL IP (0.211 BAA). 39/22 K/W in 56.2 FSL IP (64 HAA).

51.   CF/lF Darien (Trey) Martin 6'2" 188 Lbs R/R (199212) [2011-13, GA HS] [NWL #16, 2012] In 2012, 0.270/0.318/0.377 in 217 NWL PA.  6/11 in SB.

52.   LHSP Frank Del Valle 5'11" 190 Lbs (198909) [Cuba, 2011; $800K] In 2012, 84/30 K/W in 99.1 FSL IP (0.197 BAA vs LHH; 0.193 BAA vs. RHH).  Az Phil: Low 90's FB with plus movement and outstanding breaking ball.

53.   RHSP Dae-Eun Rhee 6'2" 190 Lbs (198903) [2007-KO] [2012 Cubs BA11]  Best changeup in system (BA2012) but few K’s in 2012. In 2012, 78/51 K/W in 142.1 SL IP (168 H;18 HR! 0.298 BAA).

54.   RHRP Zach Putnam 6’1” 225 Lbs (198707) [2008-05, UMich; acquired on waivers Nov 2012] [2012 Indians BA10] 49/27 K/W in 60 PCL IP (0.298 BAA).

55.   RHRP Jaye Chapman 6’0” 195 Lbs (198705) [2005-16, FL HS, Braves] 70/36 K/W in 63 AAA IP (57 hits allowed).  Excellent K/IP but shaky control.

56.   RHSP Jose Arias 6'5" 220 Lbs (199101) [DO] Mid 90s FB but secondary pitches need work. After spending 2011 in DSL posted 46/19 K/W in 63 NWL IP (0.258 BAA) in 2012.

57.   CF/LF Shawon Dunston Jr. 6'2" 175 Lbs  L/R (199302) [2011-11, HS] [2012 Cubs BA 30] In 2012, 0.577 OPS  in 69 NWL PA earned demotion to AZL where he did much better: 0.286/0.357/0.410 in 185 PA. Average speed and arm.

58.   C Justin Marra 5'11" 180 Lbs L/R (199301) [2011-15, Toronto HS].  Good receiver with solid arm.    0.322/0.457/0.467 line in 111 AZL PA. Impressive line but injury kept sample size small.

59.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

60.   SS/3B Tim Saunders 6’0’ 180 Lbs R/R (19905) [2012-32, Marietta College] In 2012, Dominated D-III, leading division in total bases, runs and hits.  Ceiling is fleet footed ML UT. Early returns suggest he could reach ceiling: 1.222 OPS in 76 AZL PA, 0.743 OPS in 46 FSL PA, & 0.862 OPS in 89 MWL PA.  5th best debut of college players (BA)

61.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

62.   RHSP Alexander Santana 6'2" 170 lb (199310) [2010-DR] In 2012, 51/14 K/W in 59 DSL IP (0.231 BAA). 87-91 mph FB with above-avg sink and a good curve ball for his age.

63.   CF/RF Jeffrey Baez 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (199310) [VZ] In 2012, 0.291/0.378/0.448 in 190 in DSL PA. 28/37 SB. 35/18 K/W.  Earned Aug cup of coffee with AZL Cubs.  Athletic projectable body.  Fleet runner with average arm.

64.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

65.   RHSwing Lendy Castillo 6’1” 170 Lbs (198904) [2007-DR] Rule 5 pick who pitched more 2012 innings in minors rehabbing groin injury than in majors.  In 2011 46/16 K/W in 46 IP (0.220 BAA) high A IP. Got shelled in limited 2012 ML IP (12/9 K/W in 12 IP, 0.390 BAA).

66.   LHSP Anthony Prieto 5’11” 170 Lbs (199311) [2012-05, TX HS; $257K] Touched mid 90s last summer but forearm strain limited his velocity to the upper 80s this spring.  Hard to hit when he found the strike zone this summer (0.145 BAA with 11/12 K/W in 19 AZL IP).

67.   LF/CF/RF John Andreoli 6'1" 215 Lbs R/R (199006) [2011-17, UCONN] Solid debut for powerless on-base machine with plus speed and good genes.  In 2012, 0.289 BA (0.402 OBP) in 487 FSL PA (54 SB).  2012 FSL postseason all-star.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 04, 2013, 08:44:12 pm
I know I've also heard this arm velocity is much less than you'd expect based on his dad.

Entirely unfair to use his father's arm as the standard to measure Dunston, Jr.'s arm.  I believe that many at the time thought that Dunston has the best arm in the draft, and that included Gooden who was taken just a few picks after him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 04, 2013, 09:03:31 pm
I suspect his arm is closer to average than plus based on his time in RF last year (0 games).

Either that, or the Cubs might think that anyone that CAN play CF, SHOULD play CF, at least in the lower minors, just to improve his value.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on January 05, 2013, 12:00:47 am
Entirely unfair to use his father's arm as the standard to measure Dunston, Jr.'s arm.  I believe that many at the time thought that Dunston has the best arm in the draft, and that included Gooden who was taken just a few picks after him.

After reading this, I was sitting there thinking, stupid old Cubs brass, why didn't they let him try and pitch, he might have been great at it.  Then, it dawned on me exactly who the statement was about again.  If nothing else, I bet no one would have been firmly planted in that batter's box.  I bet every at bat would have been Randy Johnson versus John Kruk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 05, 2013, 12:30:27 am
Arias, Contreras and Saunders
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 05, 2013, 02:21:11 am
Rodriguez, Castillo, Penalver, Torrez, Contreras, Martin,
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 05, 2013, 02:23:04 am
Rodriguez, Castillo, Penalver, Torrez, Contreras, Martin, Marra, Santana, Lang, Burke, Arias
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 05, 2013, 02:59:06 am
After reading this, I was sitting there thinking, stupid old Cubs brass, why didn't they let him try and pitch, he might have been great at it.  Then, it dawned on me exactly who the statement was about again.  If nothing else, I bet no one would have been firmly planted in that batter's box.  I bet every at bat would have been Randy Johnson versus John Kruk.

Calling Dunston's arm "great" is not quite the same as saying he would have had anything remotely resembling the kind of control a pitcher needs, or that he would have had any pitch beyond a very lively fastball.  Dunston was a great athlete.  And he would be in the HOF right now as a SS if he had been able to lay off pitches that bounced before they reached the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 05, 2013, 05:25:36 am
1. Lendy Castillo
2. Jeffrey Baez
3. LHSP Frank Del Valle
4. Carlos Penalver
5. John Andreoli
6. Justin Marra
7. Jose Arias
8. Carlos Rodriguez
9. Daury Torrez
10. Tim Saunders
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on January 05, 2013, 03:02:43 pm
Calling Dunston's arm "great" is not quite the same as saying he would have had anything remotely resembling the kind of control a pitcher needs, or that he would have had any pitch beyond a very lively fastball.  Dunston was a great athlete.  And he would be in the HOF right now as a SS if he had been able to lay off pitches that bounced before they reached the plate.

I guess I should really learn how to use purple...or at least remember to type "lol" at the end.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 05, 2013, 04:31:18 pm
I guess I should really learn how to use purple...or at least remember to type "lol" at the end.

.... I still would have posted the same response I did.  He did have a great arm, but that did not mean he was going to be an even acceptable pitcher.  Reminds me -- Rocky Colovito, RFer with a cannon for and arm and who played for the Tigers and Indians in the late 50's and early 60's, when he tired to hang on at the end of the majors, he did so by relieving, or at least trying to relieve.  He was only used in one game in 1968 by the Yankees, and wasn't also used in the OF in that game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on January 05, 2013, 06:17:29 pm
the point of having put the purple would have been to convey the understanding that I knew he had no chance of being an acceptable, or, even, a mediocre pitcher, whatsoever.  I just figured it was implied.  I mean, this is Shawon "El Bruiso ze firsto basemano con inaccurasyo" Dunston we're talking about.

<ye olde purple on>I sincerely apologize to all whom I gave the notion that I believed the Cubs should have put Mr. Dunston on the bump.<ye olde purple off>

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 05, 2013, 06:58:00 pm
No, Ray, I understood you perfectly.  I noticed you wrote, "Then, it dawned on me exactly who the statement was about again."  I wasn't trying to argue with you at all.  If anything I was agreeing with you.

My own first thought after initially thinking about the possibility was to wonder if any Cub catchers would have been able to jump high enough from the catcher's crouch to catch some of the pitches that would have been more than a bit wild high.  He did have a cannon for an arm, even if not a particularly well calibrated cannon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 05, 2013, 10:02:16 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 11.

42.   LHSP Austin Kirk 6'1" 200 Lbs (199005) [2009-03, OK HS]  In 2012, 78/48 K/W in 129 FSL IP (120 HAA) followed by 13/12 K/W in 23 SL IP (18 HAA).  FSL 2012-mid-season allstar

43.   RHSP Matt Loosen 6'2" 205 lbs (198904) [2010-23, Jacksonville College]  In 2012, 110/46 K/W in 112 FSL IP (0.202 BAA led FSL starters).  Named to 2012 post-season FSL all star team.

44.   RHSwing Josh Conway 6’1” 175 Lbs (19910) [2012-04, Coastal Carolina; $343K] #208 BA Top 500: Featured mid-90’s FB before needing TJ surgery this spring. For Coastal Carolina, has 50/18 K/W in 55 IP.

45.   CF/LF Pin-Chieh Chen 6'1" 170 lb L/R (199107) (2009-TW) NWL#14: Fleet footed line drive/contact hitter with limited upside and an above average arm. In 2012, 0.259/0.345/0.347 in 526 MWL PA. 36/50 in SB.

46.   RHRP Carlos Martinez-Pumarino 6’4” 230 Lbs (199104) [2011-CU; $250K bonus] 44/14 K/W in 43 AZL IP (0.225 BAA).  AZL post-season allstar.  In 2009-2010, pitched for Cuban national team but struggled with control (19/23 K/W in 23 IP). As of 2011, featured low 90s FB

47.   RHSwing Yao-Lin Wang 6'0" 180 lbs (199102) [2009-Taiwan] NWL#21-30.  In 2012, 82/27 K/W in 78 MWL IP (72 Hits 7 HR allowed).  FB/curve.

48.   3B/2B/SS Stephen Bruno 5’9” 165 Lbs (199011) [2012-07, UVA; $149K] #13 in VA.  0.361/0.442/0.496 in 270 NWL PA after leading UVA in hitting with.362/.418/.549 line.  Versatile IF who led NWL in OBP  [NWL #15, 2012]. 

49.   RHSP Jose Arias 6'5" 220 Lbs (199101) [DO] Mid 90s FB but secondary pitches need work. After spending 2011 in DSL posted 46/19 K/W in 63 NWL IP (0.258 BAA) in 2012.

50.   SS/2B Carlos Penalver 6'0" 170 Lbs R/R (199405) [2010-VZ, $550K]   In 2012, 0.273/0.341/0.322 in 202 AZL PA.  31/19 K/W and 7/11 in SB. 

51.   C Justin Marra 5'11" 180 Lbs L/R (199301) [2011-15, Toronto HS].  Good receiver with solid arm.    0.322/0.457/0.467 line in 111 AZL PA. Impressive line but injury kept sample size small.

52.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

53.   SS/3B Tim Saunders 6’0’ 180 Lbs R/R (19905) [2012-32, Marietta College] In 2012, Dominated D-III, leading division in total bases, runs and hits.  Ceiling is fleet footed ML UT. Early returns suggest he could reach ceiling: 1.222 OPS in 76 AZL PA, 0.743 OPS in 46 FSL PA, & 0.862 OPS in 89 MWL PA.  5th best debut of college players (BA)

54.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

55.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

56.   RHSwing Lendy Castillo 6’1” 170 Lbs (198904) [2007-DR] Rule 5 pick who pitched more 2012 innings in minors rehabbing groin injury than in majors.  In 2011 46/16 K/W in 46 IP (0.220 BAA) high A IP. Got shelled in limited 2012 ML IP (12/9 K/W in 12 IP, 0.390 BAA).

57.   LHSP Frank Del Valle 5'11" 190 Lbs (198909) [Cuba, 2011; $800K] In 2012, 84/30 K/W in 99.1 FSL IP (0.197 BAA vs LHH; 0.193 BAA vs. RHH).  Az Phil: Low 90's FB with plus movement and outstanding breaking ball.

58.   LF/CF/RF John Andreoli 6'1" 215 Lbs R/R (199006) [2011-17, UCONN] Solid debut for powerless on-base machine with plus speed and good genes.  In 2012, 0.289 BA (0.402 OBP) in 487 FSL PA (54 SB).  2012 FSL postseason all-star.

59.   RHSwing Trey Lang 6’3” 230 Lbs (199205) [2012-06, AZ  CC; $193K] Big framed kid who began 2012 as college OF, became closer/OF and was drafted by Cubs to be pitcher. Featured low 90s FB when began closing but slipped into U80s by end of season.   11/2 K/W in 13 AZL IP (16 HAA).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 05, 2013, 10:14:20 pm
Arias, Contreras, Castillo and Saunders.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 05, 2013, 11:12:07 pm
Rodriguez, Castillo, Penalver, Torrez, Contreras, Bruno, Marra, Loosen, Arias, Lang, Kirk.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 06, 2013, 01:53:55 pm
Kirk, Loosen, Conway, Martinez, Bruno, Arias, Marra, Rodriguez, Saunders, Torrez, Del Valle
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 06, 2013, 06:35:19 pm
Thanks for your votes.  Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 12.

35.   RHSP Ryan McNeil 6’3” 210 Lbs (199402) [2012-03, CA HS; $472K] 18/10 K/W in 20 AZL IP (0.264 BAA).  Multi-sport athlete with low 90s FB, slider, and changeup and sturdy frame. #185 BA top 500:

36.   RHSP Nick Struck 5'11" 185 Lbs (198910) [2009-39, Mount Hood (Ore) CC] in 2012, 123/44 K/W in 155.2 SL IP (0.238 BAA, 14 HRA) [2012 Cubs pitcher of the year, BA].  Struggled with control in AFL (fall 2012).  Durable but has not won over scouts yet.

37.   LHSP Eric Jokisch 6'2" 185 Lbs (198907) (2011-11, Northwestern) Cubs best MiL pitcher in 2011 (B America) In 2012, 63/33 K/W in 105 SL IP (0.226 BAA) after 52/16 K/W in 54 FSL IP (0.267 BAA). K/IP suffered upon promotion to SL.

38.   RHSP Marcelo Carreno 6’1” 170 Lbs (199106) (2007-VZ, for JBaker)  In 2012, repeated low-A and posted 119/28 K/W in 139 IP (129 HAA).  Low 90s FB.  Projects to have avg FB, curve, & change-up

39.   RHSP Tayler Scott 6'3" 165 Lbs (199206) [2011-05, AZ HS via S Africa] (89-93 MPH FB and slow curve).   In 2012, Disappointing 43/29 K/W in 71 NWL IP (0.245 BAA). [NWL, #17, 2012]

40.   RHSP Jose Rosario 6'1" 170 Lbs (199008) [2008-FA] [2012 Cubs BA 22] 92-94 MPH FB.  In 2012, 95/34 K/W in 111 MWL IP (0.254 BAA vs righties but 0.316 vs lefties).

41.   2B Zeke DeVoss 5'10" 175 Lb S/R (199007) [2011-03, U of Miami] [2012 Cubs BA 14] in 2011, NWL#17.  In 2012, in MWL, 0.249/0.382/0.370 35/51 in SB attempts. 82 walks but mediocre BA and 118 K’s.

42.   RHSP Jose Arias 6'5" 220 Lbs (199101) [DO] Mid 90s FB but secondary pitches need work. After spending 2011 in DSL posted 46/19 K/W in 63 NWL IP (0.258 BAA) in 2012.

43.   LHSP Austin Kirk 6'1" 200 Lbs (199005) [2009-03, OK HS]  In 2012, 78/48 K/W in 129 FSL IP (120 HAA) followed by 13/12 K/W in 23 SL IP (18 HAA).  FSL 2012-mid-season allstar

44.   RHSP Matt Loosen 6'2" 205 lbs (198904) [2010-23, Jacksonville College]  In 2012, 110/46 K/W in 112 FSL IP (0.202 BAA led FSL starters).  Named to 2012 post-season FSL all star team.

45.   3B/2B/SS Stephen Bruno 5’9” 165 Lbs (199011) [2012-07, UVA; $149K] #13 in VA.  0.361/0.442/0.496 in 270 NWL PA after leading UVA in hitting with.362/.418/.549 line.  Versatile IF who led NWL in OBP  [NWL #15, 2012]. 

46.   C Justin Marra 5'11" 180 Lbs L/R (199301) [2011-15, Toronto HS].  Good receiver with solid arm.    0.322/0.457/0.467 line in 111 AZL PA. Impressive line but injury kept sample size small.

47.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

48.   SS/3B Tim Saunders 6’0’ 180 Lbs R/R (19905) [2012-32, Marietta College] In 2012, Dominated D-III, leading division in total bases, runs and hits.  Ceiling is fleet footed ML UT. Early returns suggest he could reach ceiling: 1.222 OPS in 76 AZL PA, 0.743 OPS in 46 FSL PA, & 0.862 OPS in 89 MWL PA.  5th best debut of college players (BA)

49.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

50.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

51.   RHSwing Lendy Castillo 6’1” 170 Lbs (198904) [2007-DR] Rule 5 pick who pitched more 2012 innings in minors rehabbing groin injury than in majors.  In 2011 46/16 K/W in 46 IP (0.220 BAA) high A IP. Got shelled in limited 2012 ML IP (12/9 K/W in 12 IP, 0.390 BAA).

52.   Josh Conway 6’1” 175 Lbs (19910) [2012-04, Coastal Carolina; $343K] #208 BA Top 500: Featured mid-90’s FB before needing TJ surgery this spring. For Coastal Carolina, has 50/18 K/W in 55 IP.

53.   SS/2B Carlos Penalver 6'0" 170 Lbs R/R (199405) [2010-VZ, $550K]  In 2012, 0.273/0.341/0.322 in 202 AZL PA.  31/19 K/W and 7/11 in SB. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 06, 2013, 07:57:23 pm
Roserio, Arias, contreras.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 06, 2013, 08:15:49 pm
Just wondering, why does Torrez keep getting votes in this thing?  Isn't Top 50 a little high for someone who hasn't made it out of the DSL?
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 06, 2013, 09:25:51 pm
Age + ceiling
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 06, 2013, 09:45:33 pm
How do we know he has a good ceiling, though?

I mean there's only so much you can tell from DSL stats and how tall he is, right?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 06, 2013, 09:56:53 pm
Agree, JR, unless somebody else has heard some scouting info, I don't see anything to flash high ceiling.  He didn't get a big signing bonus, so he must not have scouted great pre-sign.  And he hasn't K'd many guys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 06, 2013, 10:30:19 pm
Just wondering, why does Torrez keep getting votes in this thing?  Isn't Top 50 a little high for someone who hasn't made it out of the DSL?

(199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP

While his K rate may not be particularly impressive, the walk rate certainly is, and he only turned 19 in mid-season.

That's enough for my vote, particularly when he is not just putting the ball over the plate, but apparently either has enough movement on the ball or control of his location that the opposition hit on;y .213 against him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 07, 2013, 06:57:02 am
Right, he had a really low walk rate, which is encouraging at any level.  And a low ERA.  6 HR/74 innings is very high in the DSL. 

His stats line is kind of cool.  In 75 innings, he allowed only 4 non-HR earned runs.  10 earned runs total, 6 via HR. (4W/50/74IP). 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 08:16:55 am
It's a nice stat line, but it's the DSL.  There's just not much you can tell about a guy facing that kind of poor competition.

Really 19 isn't all that young for a guy who's supposed to be a hotshot DSL prospect either.  Seems like if he really was that good, he'd already be in Mesa, Boise, or Peoria.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 08:19:07 am
For instance, in 2008 an 18 year old named Marcos Perez put up these numbers for the DSL Cubs.

Year
Age
Tm
Lg
Lev
Aff
W
L
W-L%
ERA
G
GS
GF
CG
SHO
SV
IP
H
R
ER
HR
BB
IBB
SO
HBP
BK
WP
BF
WHIP
H/9
HR/9
BB/9
SO/9
SO/BB
2008 (http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/league.cgi?year=2008)
18
Cubs 1 (http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/team.cgi?id=98831c37)
DOSL (http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/league.cgi?id=8e4d66e6)
FRk
CHC
6
2
.750
1.38
13
13
0
0
0
0
65.1
53
17
10
1
9
0
52
2
0
3
258
0.949
7.3
0.1
1.2
7.2
5.78

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=perez-010mar (http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=perez-010mar)

He wound up pitching relief in Mesa the following year and was out of the Cubs organization the year after that.

There's just not much you can tell about a guy in the DSL based on just numbers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 07, 2013, 09:04:36 am
Yeah, but most of the guys I'm rating him over are flawed in one or more areas, and have little/no chance of meaningful contribution at the major league level...at least with him there's some hope...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 07, 2013, 10:36:11 am
Perhaps its being discussed elsewhere but Baseball America released the Cubs top 10 this morning.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on January 07, 2013, 10:39:10 am
1. Javier Baez, ss
2. Albert Almora, of
3. Jorge Soler, of
4. Arodys Vizcaino, rhp
5. Brett Jackson, of
6. Pierce Johnson, rhp
7. Dan Vogelbach, 1b
8. Jeimer Candelario, 3b
9. Kyuji Fujikawa, rhp
10. Arismendy Alcantara, ss
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:40:10 am
1.    Javier Baez, ss    Born: Dec 01, 1992    B-T: R-R    Ht.: 6-1 Wt.: 205
Drafted: Arlington Country Day HS, Jacksonville, Fla., 2011 (1st round).  Signed by: Tom Clark
Javier Baez

Background: Born in Puerto Rico, Baez moved to Florida when he was 12. Going into his senior season at the Arlington Country Day School (Jacksonville, Fla.), he projected as a late first-round pick. He and Montverde (Fla.) Academy shortstop Francisco Lindor drew more than 100 scouts to a February showdown, and Baez kept impressing evaluators all spring. He batted .711 with 20 homers and went ninth overall to the Cubs—one pick after the Indians took Lindor—playing five pro games after signing for $2,625,000. Chicago kept him in extended spring training at the start of 2012 in order to tame his wild approach. That didn't really work, but his aggressiveness didn't stop him from posting a .979 OPS after he got to low Class A Peoria in late May. Managers named him the most exciting player in the Midwest League, where he also rated as the No. 1 prospect, and one scout said watching Baez take batting practice was the highlight of his summer. It took him just two months to hit his way to high Class A Daytona, where more advanced pitchers took advantage of his belief that he can hit any pitch in or out of the strike zone. The Cubs continued to challenge him after the season, taking the rare step of sending a teenager to the Arizona Fall League. He kept swinging from his heels, batting .211 but drilling four homers in 14 games, before breaking the tip of his left thumb in a pregame accident. He'll be fine by spring training.

Scouting Report: Baez has electric bat speed that elicits comparisons to the gold standard (Gary Sheffield), and he turns it loose every time. At some point he's going to have to tone down his swing and take more pitches—probably once he understands that opponents won't challenge him if they don't have to—but he has an uncanny ability to impart a lot of topspin on balls even when he doesn't square them up. His offensive ceiling is ridiculous, as it's not out of the question that he could develop into a well above-average hitter for both average and power. His bat alone could make him a superstar, but Baez offers a lot more in his tool kit. He surprised MWL observers and the Cubs with his smooth actions and range at shortstop. He eventually may outgrow the position, but scouts give him a chance to stay there for a while. His arm gives him a third well above-average tool, and he'd have no problem fulfilling the offensive and defensive requirements at third base. He has strong instincts and is much more under control as both a defender and baserunner. With average speed, he swiped 24 bases in 29 attempts last year. Baez plays with a ****iness that tends to infuriate opponents, which explains why he was hit by 10 pitches in 57 MWL games.

The Future: As an offensive-minded shortstop, he could be better than Starlin Castro. Baez has better defensive tools, more power and similar hitting ability. The Cubs probably won't displace Castro, but they'll keep Baez at shortstop until he shows he can't play there. He should see Double-A Tennessee at some point in 2013, perhaps even on Opening Day. Once he moderates his approach at the plate, he could get to Wrigley Field in a hurry.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:40:19 am
2.    Albert Almora, of    Born: Apr 16, 1994    B-T: R-R    Ht.: 6-1 Wt.: 170
Drafted: Mater Academy, Hialeah Gardens, Fla., 2012 (1st round).  Signed by: John Koronka/Laz Llanos
Albert Almora

Background: Scouts say Almora has more polish and better makeup than any high schooler in recent memory. His tools are solid or better across the board too, so the Cubs selected him sixth overall in June and signed him for $3.9 million. It was no surprise that he made an easy transition to pro ball, hitting .321/.331/.464 at two short-season stops.

Scouting Report: Thanks to his bat speed, loose swing and hand-eye coordination, Almora makes line-drive contact with ease. He has natural hitting rhythm and pitch-recognition skills. He will need more patience after walking just twice in 145 pro plate appearances. He's not the most physical player, but he has the hitting acumen and projection to grow into 20-homer power. Almora's defense is exceptional. He has incredible instincts, allowing his average speed to play up on the bases and in center field. He gets outstanding jumps and takes precise routes. He also has a strong, accurate arm. A quality teammate, he has helped Jorge Soler with his English.

The Future: Almora profiles as a Gold Glove center fielder who could hit third in the batting order. He'll be at Chicago's new low Class A Kane County affiliate in 2013, and he might need just two years in the minors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:40:28 am
3.    Jorge Soler, of    Born: Feb 25, 1992    B-T: R-R    Ht.: 6-3 Wt.: 205
Signed: Cuba '12 Signed by: Louie Eljaua/Jose Serra/Alex Suarez
Jorge Soler

Background: The best prospect on Cuba's bronze-medal team at the 2010 World Junior Championship, Soler was unsuccessful in his initial attempt to defect but escaped in 2011. The Cubs were linked to Soler months before he was cleared to sign by the U.S. government and MLB in June, and they quickly signed him to a nine-year, $30 million contract with a club-record $6 million bonus. He easily handled low Class A pitching in his pro debut.

Scouting Report: The ball explodes off Soler's bat, and his well above-average power can make any ballpark look small. He hit two balls onto Waveland Avenue while taking batting practice at Wrigley Field in September. He has feel for hitting too, as he uses a game plan, recognizes pitches well and can make two-strike adjustments. Some scouts worry about an arm bar and stiffness in his swing. Soler has solid speed once he gets going and good instincts on the bases. Once he improves his routes to balls, he'll be an asset in right field. He has well above-average arm strength and makes accurate throws.

The Future: A prototypical right fielder, Soler has a ceiling that rivals Javier Baez's among Chicago farmhands. The Cubs may be conservative to start 2013, letting Soler tear up the Midwest League while he continues to get acclimated to the United States.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:40:37 am

4.    Arodys Vizcaino, rhp    Born: Nov 13, 1990    B-T: R-R    Ht.: 6-0 Wt.: 190
Signed: Dominican Republic '07 Signed by: Alfredo Dominguez (Yankees)
Arodys Vizcaino

Background: After the Braves acquired him in a four-player trade that sent Javier Vazquez to the Yankees in December 2009, Vizcaino missed time the following season with a partially torn elbow ligament. He rose from high Class A to the majors in 2011, but the ligament gave out last spring and required Tommy John surgery in March that cost him the 2012 season. Atlanta parted with him and righthander Jaye Chapman in July to get Reed Johnson and Paul Maholm from the Cubs.

Scouting Report: Before he got hurt, Vizcaino was one of baseball's top pitching prospects. He had a 93-95 mph fastball that topped out at 97, and it might be his second-best pitch. The only negative about his sharp curveball was that he threw it too much. Refining his changeup and improving his fastball command were on his to-do list. Assuming Vizcaino regains full health, the biggest question will be his future role. Chicago sees a potential No. 2 starter while his detractors think his track record indicates that he won't hold up in a rotation, even if his mechanics are fine. At worst, the Cubs think they have a closer.

The Future: Chicago will handle Vizcaino, far and away their best upper-level pitching prospect, with great care. He should be able to return early in the 2013 season, but the goal is to have him ready to start for the big league club in 2014.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:40:46 am
5.    Brett Jackson, of    Born: Aug 02, 1988    B-T: L-R    Ht.: 6-2 Wt.: 210
Drafted: California, 2009 (1st round).  Signed by: John Bartsch
Brett Jackson

Background: The Cubs thought Jackson had the draft's best bat speed in 2009, when they selected him 31st overall and signed him for $972,000. He had swing-and-miss issues as an amateur, but appeared to have them under control until ge got to Triple-A. He has fanned 222 times in 592 at-bats at Iowa over the last two years, and whiffed 59 times in 120 at-bats after he joined the Cubs in August.

Scouting Report: Jackson's problems may be mechanical. He has developed a bad habit of drifting toward the plate, blocking off his hands and leaving him easy prey for inside fastballs. He also takes or swings through too many hittable pitches. As his problems got worse, he started chasing more offspeed pitches. Even if Jackson doesn't hit for a high average, he still can do a lot to help a club. He draws walks and has plus power and speed, still managing to produce 60 extra-base hits (including 19 homers) and 27 steals in 2012 despite his struggles. He can play a solid center field and provide above-average defense on the corners. His arm is average and accurate.

The Future: Jackson may have gotten caught up trying to do too much as he got close to and then reached the majors. If he can relax and make some adjustments, he could be a 20-20 player. He should open 2013 as Chicago's center fielder unless he tanks in spring training
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:40:55 am
6.    Pierce Johnson, rhp    Born: May 10, 1991    B-T: R-R    Ht.: 6-3 Wt.: 170
Drafted: Missouri State, 2012 (1st round supplemental).  Signed by: Stan Zielinski
Pierce Johnson

Background: Since 2001, Missouri State has had four pitchers selected in the first or sandwich round, and has sent seven arms to the big leagues. The latest product is Johnson, who went 43rd overall last June and lasted that long only because he missed two starts with a forearm strain in the spring. His stuff looked as crisp as ever after he signed for $1,196,000.

Scouting Report: Johnson consistently works at 92-94 mph and reaches 96 with his lively fastball. His hammer curveball gives him two pitches that can get swings and misses. He also has a mid-80s cutter and a changeup that's coming along. Johnson is more about power than finesse, and his control and command are no better than average. He doesn't have a clean medical history, as he had forearm issues as a high school senior and college freshman and dislocated a kneecap while warming up in the summer Cape Cod League in 2011. The Cubs rave about his work ethic and character.

The Future: How thin is the system's pitching? Among Chicago prospects with a legitimate chance to pitch in the front half of a big league rotation, Johnson already is the second-most advanced despite having just 11 innings of pro experience. The Cubs will expedite his development, which could mean starting his first full pro season in high Class A.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:41:03 am
7.    Dan Vogelbach, 1b    Born: Dec 17, 1992    B-T: L-R    Ht.: 6-0 Wt.: 250
Drafted: Bishop Verot HS, Fort Myers, Fla., 2011 (2nd round).  Signed by: Lukas McKnight
Dan Vogelbach

Background: The Cubs spent $12 million on the 2011 draft, highlighted by a pair of high schoolers with light-tower power in Javier Baez and Vogelbach. Vogelbach barely played after signing late for $1.6 million, but he made up for lost time by hitting .322/.410/.641 with 17 homers in 61 games last year.

Scouting Report: Vogelbach has more usable power than Baez or Jorge Soler, which is saying a lot. He has plenty of bat speed and strength, but Vogelbach does more than just grip it and rip it. He earns high marks for his advanced approach and feel for hitting. He controls the strike zone, takes walks and uses the entire field with an effortless swing. He can get pull-conscious at times but generally hits from gap to gap. Vogelbach will need to keep producing at the plate because he can't do anything else. He has improved his conditioning since ballooning to 280 pounds in 2010, but he'll always carry a lot of weight. He's a liability on the basepaths and adequate at best as a first baseman. A lot of teams see him as a DH, which wouldn't do a National League club any good.

The Future: Vogelbach's build and background as a Florida prep product are similar to those of Billy Butler and Prince Fielder, as is his offensive upside. Vogelbach and Soler should put on shows in batting practice at Kane County this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:41:12 am
8.    Jeimer Candelario, 3b    Born: Nov 24, 1993    B-T: B-R    Ht.: 6-1 Wt.: 180
Signed: Dominican Republic '10 Signed by: Jose Serra/Marino Encarnacion
Jeimer Candelario

Background: Signed for $500,000 in 2010, Candelario and tore up the Rookie-level Dominican Summer League in his pro debut the following year. The Cubs threw a two-level promotion at him for 2012, making him the youngest regular in the short-season Northwest League, and he was up to the challenge.

Scouting Report: Though he's just 19, Candelario already shows a fluid swing and feel for hitting from both sides of the plate. He's advanced for his age in terms of plate discipline, pitch recognition and willingness to use the entire field. He didn't drive the ball a lot last summer, but he has the bat speed and projectable frame to develop 20-homer power. He'll need to get stronger after hitting just .265 with two homers in the final two months of the NWL season. Candelario has the soft hands and strong arm for third base but it's questionable whether he can play there at the highest levels. He has below-average speed and fringy range, and his concentration wanders at times. He led NWL third basemen with 20 errors in 59 games.

The Future: Candelario will stay at third base for now as he advances to low Class A. Moving to first base wouldn't be an attractive option, because he'd have to battle Anthony Rizzo and Dan Vogelbach for future playing time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:41:21 am
9.    Kyuji Fujikawa, rhp    Born: Jul 21, 1980    B-T: L-R    Ht.: 6-0 Wt.: 190
Signed: Japan '12 Signed by: Paul Weaver
Kyuji Fujikawa

Background: Fujikawa made his Nippon Professional Baseball debut at age 19 and has been once of Japan's top relievers since 2005. He led the Central League with 46 saves in 2007 and 41 in 2011, and he recorded 220 saves and a 1.77 ERA in 12 seasons with Hanshin. He also was a regular on national teams, pitching in the 2008 Olympics and the 2006 and 2009 World Baseball Classics. Fujikawa had asked the Hanshin Tigers to post him to a major league club for several years, but they declined and he had to wait to become a free agent this offseason. Chicago signed him in December to two-year deal that's worth $9.5 million and includes a vesting option for 2015.

Scouting Report: Fujikawa throws harder than most Japanese pitchers, regularly operating with a 91-94 mph fastball. His out pitch is a mid-80s splitter, and he also uses an upper-70s slurve. He commands and controls his pitches well, with career averages of 11.9 strikeouts and 2.7 walks per nine innings in Japan. With his track record of pitching in the late innings and in international tournaments, he has no problems dealing with pressure.

The Future: The Cubs are confident that Fujikawa can handle the late innings but won't determine his specific role until spring training. Whether they ask him to close games probably depends on whether they trade Carlos Marmol.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:41:29 am
10.    Arismendy Alcantara, ss    Born: Oct 29, 1991    B-T: B-R    Ht.: 5-10 Wt.: 160
Signed: Dominican Republic '08 Signed by: Jose Serra/Marino Encarnacion/Carlos Reyes
Arismendy Alcantara

Background: Alcantara finally started to translate his intriguing tools into on-field performance in 2012, but his season came to a premature end when he broke a bone in his foot on July 11. Before he got hurt, he already had set career highs in most offensive categories and earned recognition from managers as the best infield arm in the high Class A Florida State League. He returned to play with Licey in the Dominican League.

Scouting Report: Alcantara is a live-bodied switch-hitter who can hit for average and provide solid power for a middle infielder from both sides of the plate. His further offensive development will be tied to improved selectivity at the plate, as he still gives away at-bats at times. He has plus speed and knows how to use it, stealing 25 bases in 29 tries in 2012. Alcantara has the quickness, range and arm strength to make all the plays at shortstop. But he loses focus at times and makes too many off-target throws, leading to 30 errors in 71 games at short last year. The game may just be too fast for him there, so he might be better off at second base.

The Future: Scouts throw some Jimmy Rollins comparisons on Alcantara, though at the same point of his career, Rollins already had reached Triple-A. Alcantara will seek better health and consistency when he advances to Double-A in 2013.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:46:30 am
I wish BA didn't include guys like Fujikawa on there.  That's one less real prospect for us to learn about.

Also interesting that there's no Vitters or Szczur.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:48:41 am
I'm also a little surprised Candelario got in the Top 10, even though he had kind of a blah year at Boise and might have to move off of 3B. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 07, 2013, 10:50:03 am
I don't think anyone other than a few Cubs fans considers Vitters much of a prospect anymore.  And most people seem to have jumped on the Reed-Johnson-ceiling-for-Szczur bandwagon as well.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 07, 2013, 11:08:27 am
Disappointing that Candelario sounds more like a corner OFer than a 3Bman...also interesting that he made the list over Villanueva...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 07, 2013, 11:18:53 am
Interesting that Vogel is a "can't do anything else" DH/1B, and they write up Candelario as a probable 1B, but they're still 7 and 8 for a system Callis ranks 12th best.  Perhaps reflects the perceived value of true-hitting power guys; and how rare it is to find prospects that don't have some limiting issue or other. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 11:21:49 am
Disappointing that Candelario sounds more like a corner OFer than a 3Bman...also interesting that he made the list over Villanueva...

Yeah that's also a good point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 07, 2013, 11:39:14 am
Right, he had a really low walk rate, which is encouraging at any level.  And a low ERA.  6 HR/74 innings is very high in the DSL.  His stats line is kind of cool.  In 75 innings, he allowed only 4 non-HR earned runs.

HR are not nearly so troublesome when no one is on base.

For instance, in 2008 an 18 year old named Marcos Perez put up these numbers for the DSL Cubs.

Year
Age
Tm
Lg
Lev
Aff
W
L
W-L%
ERA
G
GS
GF
CG
SHO
SV
IP
H
R
ER
HR
BB
IBB
SO
HBP
BK
WP
BF
WHIP
H/9
HR/9
BB/9
SO/9
SO/BB
2008 (http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/league.cgi?year=2008)
18
Cubs 1 (http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/team.cgi?id=98831c37)
DOSL (http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/league.cgi?id=8e4d66e6)
FRk
CHC
6
2
.750
1.38
13
13
0
0
0
0
65.1
53
17
10
1
9
0
52
2
0
3
258
0.949
7.3
0.1
1.2
7.2
5.78

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=perez-010mar (http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=perez-010mar)

He wound up pitching relief in Mesa the following year and was out of the Cubs organization the year after that.

4 walks in 74 innings is a good deal better than 13 in 44, or his 9 in 65 the next year in the DSL.  Additionally folks have not voted him into the top 50 yet.  Lots of young pitching prospects wash out by the time they are 20, particularly those who are at that level, so one example of a washout does not mean ranking a guy in the 50-70 range is over-rating him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 07, 2013, 11:56:27 am
Interesting/encouraging that Alcantara was that high, I've had concerns about his low walk-rate, his high error rate, and whether he's big enough to actually hit with useful power, or fast enough to steal.  The Rollins comp is interesting; Rollins was a .711-OPS guy in the minors.  Obviously a stretch, because Rollins was taking more walks than K's at Alcantara's age, and of course Rollins was super base-stealing fast.  Still, it speaks to the perception of outstanding athleticism for scouts to even bring him up as a comp. 

So, add him to the pool of 2B possibilities.  Seems like a lot:  Baez, Watkins, Alcantara, Torreyes, Amaya, and DeLaRosa, and maybe I'm forgetting more.  There could be some ready players by the time Barney reaches free agency. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 07, 2013, 12:01:24 pm
Many thanks for the BA content, JR.

Wow! The write-ups on Baez, Almora and Soler are stunningly good.  If they turn out to be as good as they are being projected, when you add them to Castro and Rizzo, that's a formidable offensive/defensive core.  If Jackson gets his Ks to a reasonable level, the Cubs would have an outstanding outfield, and the makings of an excellent infield as well. 

Fingers are crossed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 01:19:20 pm
Jim Callis: Hi, everyone. There's always a lot of interest from Cubs fans in our Cubs Top 10, and this year is no different if the backlog of question in the chat queue is any indication . . . With Paniagua, it's some of each. He's got a slingy arm action that leads some scouts to think he's a reliever in the long run, but he'll begin his Cubs career as a starter. He has pitched 39 pro innings in the last four years, so there are lot of unknowns, but it's hard not to like the 94-98 mph fastball.

  Jim Callis: He was No. 12. When I go through the process of Top 10, I'm constantly tweaking it, and he was on and off the bottom of the list before winding up. I do like him, I just liked 11 guys more. Villanueva gets raves for his defense and makeup, but a lot of scouts don't think his power profiles at third base in the long run. Some think he might have 15-homer power, while other think that's a stretch. And without solid pop, it's hard to profile as a first-division regular at third base.

  Jim Callis: He's a second baseman who has yet to reach full-season ball, and there's not a single one of those guys on any team's Top 10. I do like Amaya and think he has the upside of a solid regular. He can hit for average, might surprise you with some pop, has plus speed and plays a nice second base. But he's at least three years away.

  Jim Callis: It does, as three of the top four prospects are new additions: Albert Almora, Jorge Soler, Arodys Vizcaino. I'd say this year's Top 30 is a 50-55, while last year's was more of a 45.

  Jim Callis: The tools are all there. He has become a more selective hitter, he has the raw strength for average power, he has the plus-plus pure speed to wreak havoc on the bases and play a nifty center field. He's something of an enigma for me. On one hand, he's more advanced that someone who played four years of college football would be expected to be. On the other hand, he's still figuring out how to best translate his tools into skills. He still has the upside of a solid regular but might wind up being more of a good fourth outfielder.

  Jim Callis: Blackburn stands out as being the most polished of all the pitchers the Cubs took in the early round of the 2012 draft. He has a chance to have good command of three solid or better pitches.

  Jim Callis: Wasn't room for him on the list. Had a so-so pro debut, still a ways to go figuring out how to translate tools into skills. If you like him, you buy into his speed, defense and arm and think he can be a solid hitter with average power. He'll need time to develop.

  Jim Callis: McNutt, though he never has dominated again like he did in low Class A and is a reliever at this point. Rhee went way backward last year and didn't come close to making the Top 30.

  Jim Callis: I would say no. I do our Midwest League Top 20, and scouts who saw him there thought a) he looked terrible and b) couldn't believe he signed for $6 million. When he signed, our reports made him sound like a finesse lefty, and I thought the bonus was over the top just from reading the reports. Didn't come close to making the Top 30.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 01:19:39 pm
Jim Callis: Yes. Those are the two biggest needs for Johnson, but I thought he was a steal as a sandwich pick. If he didn't have forearm tightness that cost him a couple of starts in the spring, I thought he would have gone in the bottom third of the first round. He's already one of the most advanced pitchers in the system despite barely having pitched as a pro, and I believe in the track record of pitchers from Missouri State.

  Jim Callis: Though he was overmatched jumping from Rookie ball to low Class A, he has a chance to be a solid regular. Of all the Cubs prospects currently playing shortstop, he has the best chance to stay there. He can be a plus defender and a decent hitter.

  Jim Callis: Kudos to Joe for remembering the point of the depth chart. We're not trying to guess at free-agent moves and trades, we're just trying to show the best options currently within the system. As I mentioned earlier, we don't know a lot about Paniagua yet, but he does have the live arm you look for in a closer. Speaking of closers, I could see Kyuji Fujikawa taking over that job this season.

  Jim Callis: You could argue Lake ahead of Candelario, as he has advanced further through the system and has a broader base of tools. But I see him as more of a tease, a guy who can impress you with his cannon arm, raw power and solid speed but doesn't put everything together consistently enough on the diamond. I think he'll move off shortstop this year, with perhaps less defensive demands leading to improved offense. Candelario is further away, but for me, he has a much better chance to provide an impact bat than Lake. He could have more defensive value, too, if Candelario can stay at third base and Lake winds up on an outfield corner.

  Jim Callis: By keeping him in extended spring, I think the Cubs were trying to send a message that he needs to tone down his approach and flair. He didn't really do that, and it didn't prevent him from destroying low Class A pitching. I don't think he'll make any major changes until he struggles for a long stretch, and he's talent enough that he may get to the big leagues without that happening. If you told me that Baez was part of the Cubs' 2014 lineup, that wouldn't shock me. He's crazy talented.

  Jim Callis: Alcantara has the tools to be Jimmy Rollins in Rollins' prime--not saying that will happen, but the talent is there--and that's quite a valuable player. My order of middle infielders on the 11-30 was Watkins, Hernandez and Amaya, but I had them all bunched up at 19-21, so there wasn't much difference. My next guy might have been Tim Saunders, but I want to see the 32nd-rounder from last year's draft have more extended success before I jumped fully on the bandwagon. Torreyes can hit, but he's so tiny and I'm not sure he does anything else special to make him a big league regular. Bruno is like Saunders in that he probably played over his head in his pro debut. Don't forget Zeke DeVoss either.

  Jim Callis: Not too concerning, because he signed late in 2011 and I think the Cubs were being extra cautious in 2012. But I will say that most of the scouts I've talked to don't care for his delivery.

  Jim Callis: He didn't look nearly as good as he did in 2011, when he might have pitched himself all the way to Wrigley Field if he hadn't blown out his elbow. But how he looked last year doesn't really matter--the Cubs just wanted to get him healthy and back on the mound. How he looks in 2013 is important.

  Jim Callis: 1-2-3 could have been shuffled into any order. Almora has the highest floor of the three (an exceptionally high floor for someone fresh out of high school) and probably the worst tools--but those tools are still pretty good (plus bat, solid power, average speed that plays up, exceptional CF defense). I've heard some people argue that Soler has a higher ceiling than Baez, though Soler has less track record than the other two. I kept going back and forth on Almora vs. Soler.

  Jim Callis: I ranked the system No. 12. They came in at No. 13 in our Handbook rankings, which we'll revise again during the spring so they'll include all of the offseason transactions.

  Jim Callis: Paniagua would have been No. 10 (though I also considered Villanueva) if Fujikawa hadn't just snuck in under our transaction deadline. His addition made up for the loss of Starling Peralta in the Rule 5 draft. I had Peralta toward the end of the list.

  Jim Callis: I think it would be hard to swing a deal for Vogelbach, because he might be a DH only and hasn't gotten to full-season ball. So an AL club wouldn't give up a ton for him, and the Cubs have no motivation to give him away cheaply. His power is obvious, and I don't think he gets as much credit for being a well-rounded hitter as he deserves.

  Jim Callis: In a word, yes. In more than a word, they're desperate for starters, his elbow has been fixed and they can always put him back in the bullpen if they have to.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 01:20:19 pm
Jim Callis: From the outside, seems to me the Cubs' plan is to be in long term talent acquisition mode again in 2013, return to respectability in 2014 and be a legitimate contender in 2015.

  Jim Callis: I put him at No. 11 on my personal overall Top 50 in the Prospect Handbook.

  Jim Callis: Right now, I see them taking a much-needed frontline college arm like Mark Appel, Sean Manaea or Ryne Stanek. But a lot can happen in the next five months. I don't really see a college bat like Colin Moran forcing his way into the No. 2 pick, but maybe someone on the high school side like Austin Meadows could.

  Jim Callis: Baez. Lindor is the better defender, but I'll go with the more spectacular offensive upside.

  Jim Callis: I think there's still a solid regular in there. He did strike out 217 times this year, but he also had 19 homers, 60 extra-base hits and 27 steals, and he can play center field.

  Jim Callis: As I alluded earlier, Juan Carlos Paniagua was 11 and Christian Villanueva was 12. Here's one more: Alberto Cabrera was 13.

  Jim Callis: Plenty of reasons to be optimistic, starting with a fastball that reaches 98 and flashes of a promising curveball and changeup. I haven't heard any makeup or work ethic questions. He's just very inconsistent right now.

  Jim Callis: You're talking to the guy who has driven the Matt Szczur bandwagon. Don't think I've ever been accused of being light on Szczur before this.

  Jim Callis: Those are two of the Cubs' best, but you are correct in identifying that as the system's thinnest position. The Cubs' catcher of the future may not be in the organization right now.

  Jim Callis: Raley might fit better in relief. I just don't see anything that's enough of an out pitch to make him successful as a starter in the long run, even in the back of a rotation.

  Jim Callis: I thought about him for the Top 30 this year. He profiles best at second base, and his bat will have to carry him. I don't expect him to hit .361 again once he hit full-season pro ball, but if he continues to rake I won't be able to exclude him again.

  Jim Callis: I do see some promise there, though I didn't put him on the Top 30. No. 4 starter is his ceiling. I bet he winds up being an effective reliever, relying mainly on low-90s fastballs with natural cutting action.

  Jim Callis: Not really, though he was the Cubs' minor league pitcher of the year. He stands out more for his strike-throwing ability than his stuff. His ceiling is as a back-of-the-rotation starter, but a more realistic role would be middle reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 01:20:36 pm
Jim Callis: Vogelbach; both are DH types, really; and Vogelbach.

  Jim Callis: Switching to lightning-round mode to squeeze a few more questions in: I'd say the consensus is quality utility guy on a good team. He could be a better all-around player than Darwin Barney. Watkins is about another year away.

  Jim Callis: Can be. I'm not completely sold.

  Jim Callis: Not an overdraft--the Royals almost took him No. 2. Pirates loved him at No. 4. Lot of scouts still think there's a .275/20 HR guy in there, though he's probably not a third base. I would send him back to Triple-A to start the year.

  Jim Callis: Had the Cubs realized they weren't going to contend again soon, they wouldn't have made that trade. But I don't think they got fleeced. Archer could be a No. 3 starter--or a reliever. Lee could be a regular shortstop--or he might not hit enough. If Garza were healthy, Cubs could swing a nice trade for some young talent.

  Jim Callis: There's some potential there. Those who like him see a possible big league regular, though he's a few years away still.

  Jim Callis: Yes. Very good defender, upside of .280 hitter with 15 homers.

  Jim Callis: He could sneak on there at the end. I haven't plotted out my list beyond the Top 50, so can't tell you where I'd put him.

  Jim Callis: Considered it but he didn't make it.

  Jim Callis: I'm not a believer.

  Jim Callis: Bogaerts. And I addressed that choice in my column for our latest issue of the magazine. Should be online soon.

 Jim Callis: Thanks for all the great questions. Next up in our series of Top 10 chats is the Reds, with J.J. Cooper taking your questions on Wednesday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 01:35:56 pm
Many thanks for the BA content, JR.

No problem Ron.  BA Cubs Top 10 day is like Christmas and New Year's for me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 07, 2013, 02:23:30 pm
Great stuff, JR.  Thanks much.  So, we know his top 13, and 19-21, so that's 16 total. 
Pretty sure that Szczur, Underwood and Maples will be in there, probably all three in the teens. 
Vitters and Lake will still show up somewhere. 
Zych. 
Rondon will show up somewhere, they usually fit Rule 5 guys in there somewhere if there is anything nice scouting-wise. 
His Blackburn stuff was nice, so he'll probably be in there, back ten. 
Sounds like Martin, probably. 
He sounded like Whitenack might get in there, and depending on what he's heard I'd not be surprised if Wells still fit in somewhere, just in case he's healthy. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 07, 2013, 04:07:25 pm
I'm also a little surprised Candelario got in the Top 10, even though he had kind of a blah year at Boise and might have to move off of 3B. 

Candelario had an ops of almost 750 at Bloise, at a time when most kids his age were playing high school ball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 07, 2013, 06:00:29 pm
..Wow! The write-ups on Baez, Almora and Soler are stunningly good.  If they turn out to be as good as they are being projected, when you add them to Castro and Rizzo, that's a formidable offensive/defensive core.  .. ...

Yes.  If those three all worked out, with Rizzo and Castro, the future is limitless.  I thought Callis's comments on how those three could go in any order, and how totally flip-floppable Almora and Soler were, were also helpful.  I thought it was also telling that despite all of his errors, that Baez still listed as the best defensive infielder in the farm.  And in his future lineup thing, he moved Castro rather than Baez.  Pretty exciting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 07, 2013, 06:22:25 pm
I don't think that scouts place as much emphasis on errors by young shortstops as fans do at the lowest levels of the minors.  First of all, the kids are young and raw, and are almost certainly going to get better as they gain experience and age.  Second, the fields in the lower minors (and some of the upper minors) are not in the same condition as those in the typical ML park.  And lastly, the defensive level of their first basemen is often pretty crappy.

How many errors would Dunston had over his career if his first baseman had been the average short season prospect, rather than Mark Grace.

But I was also surprised at the implication that Baez is better (or expected to be) than Castro.  I have always thought that the Cubs might shift Castro over to second, but because he would make the better second baseman, not because Baez would make the better shortstop.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on January 07, 2013, 06:43:54 pm
I think you leave the better SS at SS.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 07, 2013, 07:00:11 pm
I would think you would want to have the better combination, regardless of who was where.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 07, 2013, 07:24:22 pm
I think Callis has kind of had it in his head for years that Castro wasn't going to stick.  And, I don't think he always changes his mind very quickly. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 07, 2013, 07:29:53 pm
Scott, Rodriguez, Penalver, McNeil, Torrez, Contreras, Bruno, Marra, DeVoss, Loosen, Arias, Kirk
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 07, 2013, 07:47:55 pm
So, add him to the pool of 2B possibilities.  Seems like a lot:  Baez, Watkins, Alcantara, Torreyes, Amaya, and DeLaRosa, and maybe I'm forgetting more.  There could be some ready players by the time Barney reaches free agency. 

You forget Logan Watkins and Zeke DeVoss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 07, 2013, 08:03:00 pm
One of the tricky parts of forecasting future major league second basemen is that they often spend most of their minor league years at another position. That said is does seem like the Cubs have a bunch of interesting prospects at that position.

I was surprised that Jeimer Candelario made the top 10.  I was actually mild disappointed by his 2012 numbers.

I was also surprised that Fujikawa made the top 10. I had him in the low 20s.   Its the eternal question of how much weight you give ceiling versus floor and low-risk versus extreme-risik.

With respect to the Bleacher Bums list, obviously, I was also surprised by how well Torrez has done.  As far as I know his bonus is <$100K. His K/IP doesn't blow you away but his K/W is absurdly good.  Does any know if he came to the states this fall for instructionals? I'm not aware that he did.

Unlike some people, I haven't given up on Vitters (probably because I look at minor league numbers more than major league numbers).   His ML stint was so bad, you wonder if he'll ever get another shot with the Cubs.  Rizzo didn't with the Padres.

I'll probably hold off on updating the prospect list until tomorrow.  Only two responses (beyond my mysterious list)  and so much BA stuff to digest!



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 07, 2013, 08:22:48 pm
Dallen, you'll note from my vote this time that I still have Rodriguez (2nd) and Torrez (5th) in my top five. Like all DSL prospects, they're miles away from MLB, and may never reach full-season A ball. Torrez has shown an insane ability to throw strikes (50 K's and 4 BB's). I suspect his 4 HR allowed came from throwing a few too many strikes to the wrong hitters. Overall, Rodriguez's numbers are similar to Torrez's, and he's considerably younger, in his first DSL season and left-handed.

My new #1 (so far, that is) is Tayler Scott, the South African kid who loves baseball so much he moved to the U.S. to play high school ball. Like Samardjiza and Szczur, he was a star player in another sport (in his case, soccer) before he switched to baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on January 07, 2013, 08:23:45 pm
I think you leave the better SS at SS.

If both Castro and Baez continue to prove they are a legit major league defensive SS--and both hit a lot--it would be pretty unusual to move a player like that off of SS early in a career.  Who does that?

ARod moved off SS at age 28 but that was a highly unusual situation and Castro will only be 25 in 2015 when Baez might be major league ready. 

Maybe Castro continues to make more errors than acceptable at SS or it becomes obvious that Baez will outgrow the position within a few seasons after reaching the majors.  But, if both are clearly SS caliber guys for the long term, very hard to move such a guy off of SS, which is a special position. 

I guess what I'm saying is that you have to consider a major trade of one, if both these guys are flat out shortstops. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 07, 2013, 09:43:29 pm
You forget Logan Watkins and Zeke DeVoss.

I included Watkins, but did forget DeVoss.  I wouldn't include him, though.  I've gotten the idea that his defense is very bad, and his offense doesn't look great enough to put up with poor defense.  2B may not be SS in terms of physical demands, but 2B defense is really important, and you better be a really good hitter to justify poor defense. 

Quote
One of the tricky parts of forecasting future major league second basemen is that they often spend most of their minor league years at another position.


Many (most?) big-league 2B's played SS.  (Barney, Theriot, Sandberg, Bobby Hill are probably more the rule than the exception.  Flaherty, Lemahieu, etc.)  That's why I included Baez and Marco Hernandez, even though I'm not sure if Baez has ever played 2B.  Not sure whether Marco has or hasn't.   I coudln't think of any other SS's in the system who have any big-league promise, although who knows down in DSL.  (I know Lake has played SS of a style, but I don't think he's got any chance at 2B.) 


But a switch to 2B is pretty rare from any other position.  DeVoss is one of the few converts from OF, and that doesn't look too promising.  Another was Chad Meyers, who also worked and worked to anti-awful, but never got better than pretty bad. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 07, 2013, 10:03:36 pm
If both Castro and Baez continue to prove they are a legit major league defensive SS--and both hit a lot--it would be pretty unusual to move a player like that off of SS early in a career.  Who does that?

ARod moved off SS at age 28 but that was a highly unusual situation and Castro will only be 25 in 2015 when Baez might be major league ready. 

Maybe Castro continues to make more errors than acceptable at SS or it becomes obvious that Baez will outgrow the position within a few seasons after reaching the majors.  But, if both are clearly SS caliber guys for the long term, very hard to move such a guy off of SS, which is a special position. 

I guess what I'm saying is that you have to consider a major trade of one, if both these guys are flat out shortstops. 

I agree that might make sense and be worth considering.  I think trading Baez could make a lot of sense, with Castro entrenched. 

That said,
1.  A lot of guys who "might" be good SS's don't end up being exceptionally good. 
2.  Many guys outgrow it.  By the time they have the experience to play it well, they no longer have the flexibility.
3.  Some guys need to work to stay slender in order to stick, at the expense of their strength and power.  Perhaps both will have the ability to stay at SS, but the one who moves might become a greater power hitter at 2B or 3B.
4.  A guy might be somewhat below average defensively, but still stick at SS by virtue of a plus bat.  But if he moves to 2B or 3B, he can take the bat with him but may be well above average defensively.  Baez may hit enough to be a value even if he's somewhat below average at SS, but he might be well above average at 2B and perhaps gold glove at 3B.  Some question Sandberg's tools, but I believe he could have been a capable defensive SS.  But he wouldn't have been a great one like he was great at 2B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 07, 2013, 10:20:58 pm
But a switch to 2B is pretty rare from any other position.  DeVoss is one of the few converts from OF, and that doesn't look too promising.  Another was Chad Meyers, who also worked and worked to anti-awful, but never got better than pretty bad. 

Skip Schumaker switched from the outfield to second base, and did it in the majors after playing there only 4 games in the minors.

In fairness, his first games at second base in the majors were against the Cubs, so that eased the transition.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 07, 2013, 10:49:43 pm
Chipper Jones never played a game anywhere but shortstop in the minor leagues.  But he had Jeff Blauser blocking him when he got to the majors, so he moved to third base.

Castro is just a little better than Blauser.  If Chipper can move for Blauser, the Cubs can probably figure out a solution for Castro/Baez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 07, 2013, 10:54:33 pm
Quote
But he had Jeff Blauser blocking him when he got to the majors, so he moved to third base.

When you do a Google search on the phrase "Contract Year Player", there's a picture of Jeff Blauser.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 07, 2013, 11:08:26 pm
I think reb's point, though, is that if both guys really are GOOD SS's, it may be a waste of value to move.  If Baez is a really good defensive SS, and hasn't played much 2B or 3B so he actually isn't very good at either of those, and if some other team doesn't have a really good defensive SS who can also hit, isn't Baez more valuable to the team that can put his talents and his experience to work at SS, rather than playing for us at a position where his tools are underutilized and where he has no experience?  Transact our good value for some good value that somebody else has and we want.  It certainly makes good sense. 

The funny thing is, though, that SS seems like such an elite position that all the best talents go there.  So not only is it populated by the most gifted defensive players, but it's not the age of Kessenger and Belanger any more.  Isn't the power norm now higher at SS than at 2B, and pretty much higher than 3B as well?  I thought the league normal SS OPS and slugging and all that were higher at SS than at either 2B or 3B.  Or did I totally imagine that? 
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 07, 2013, 11:23:46 pm
Callis, via Twitter...

@jimcallisBA: Had him ahead of Almora on #mlbdraft rankings, so No. 2. @letsgocubs13: If the #cubs take Appel where would be be on the top 10?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on January 08, 2013, 12:06:32 am
Using the BA study from 2012, the "average regular" offensive performance is still lower at SS than 2B and 3B in 2010-2011:

3B-  270-333-438

2B- 268-336-414

SS- 268-324-395
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 08, 2013, 12:26:38 am
For every Tulo, there's 2 Brandon Crawford's...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on January 08, 2013, 12:37:52 am
I think reb's point, though, is that if both guys really are GOOD SS's, it may be a waste of value to move.   

Yes, that is my point.  I think that is one reason that Cubs were willing to trade Hak ju-Lee in the Garza trade.  His value is at SS, as was Castro.

Castro made considerable defensive strides in 2012.   Gotta think now that he should stay at SS for a long time. Maybe will feel differently after 2013.  And, let's say, for sake of discussion, that Baez truly has outstanding SS instincts and looks like a really good defensive SS come 2015.  So, you have one guy who is 25 and the other guy is 22 at that point. 

Just seems peculiar to move either guy to a lesser position when both offer (let's hope) major offensive production for the SS position.  Not a lot of precedent for that kind of position move at that age.

Regarding Chipper Jones, I have a copy of the 1995 Stats, Inc. Minor League Scouting Notebook. Chipper missed the entire 1994 minor league season with a knee injury and the scouting assessment in 1995 says he was perhaps the best prospect in baseball in 1993 and figures to be a star "though it may be at third base."  So, I think that was in the cards from early-on and seems doubtful that Jeff Blauser would have blocked Chipper at SS if Chipper was a plus defender and a natural at SS. 

I'm guessing that Chipper could have done a reasonably good job at SS for a time (he shared SS with Rafael Belliard a year or so later when Blauser got hurt and missed a lot of time) but Chipper probably was destined to play 3B for the long run. 

Maybe Baez will have a similar defensive projection as Chipper, and we'll know that by 2015--which would solve the "problem."  My point is what do you do if both are clearly quality defensive shortstops?  Seems a shame to move either to a lesser valued position.  Not really fair to the player and probably not good value for the organization, given the incredible value of a good defensive SS who can rake offensively.  Would be a great problem to have.


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 08, 2013, 12:42:40 am
The subject of who gets to play shortstop in the majors, Castro or Baez, is an extremely important one for the posters on this board.  But I suspect that we spend a lot more time thinking and talking about the issue than the Cubs front office does.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on January 08, 2013, 01:20:06 am
In the day-to-day running of the Cubs operation in 2013, they are not going to sweat a question that does not figure to arise until maybe 2015.

But, it's a bit of a philosophical question too and I'm guessing that Theo and Hoyer have kicked it around some.

Also, let's say a year from now, David Price comes on the market because Rays can't afford to extend him and Castro and Baez are both coming off excellent 2013 seasons.  Maybe the SS "duplication" becomes a factor in putting a deal together for a #1 starter.   You never know.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 08, 2013, 04:39:00 am
Using the BA study from 2012, the "average regular" offensive performance is still lower at SS than 2B and 3B in 2010-2011:

3B-  270-333-438

2B- 268-336-414

SS- 268-324-395

While modestly lower, the days of Mark Belangers and Bobby Wines at SS would appear to be gone.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 08, 2013, 08:32:34 am
That would have been a better post if you had said "days of Bobby Wine and Cookie Rojas up the middle"...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 08, 2013, 08:54:17 am
I think the upside is high enough with both Castro and Baez that you don't trade either of them.  Both have bats that will be well above average at any of the three positions.  And any offensive advantage you lose by moving them to another position is offset by the fact that a guy who is good defensively at shortstop has a chance to be elite defensively at 3B or 2B.

Quote
Just seems peculiar to move either guy to a lesser position when both offer (let's hope) major offensive production for the SS position.  Not a lot of precedent for that kind of position move at that age.

I think it just seems that way because we generally forget that guys who moved that early were originally shortstops.  But there are plenty of cases where it happens...Ryne Sandberg played only 21 games anywhere but SS in his minor league career before he broke in.  Brandon Phillips played 14 games at 2B before making his MLB debut, but has only played a handful of games at SS in the majors.  Darwin Barney obviously moved off SS for Castro.  I don't have a good grasp of how good any of those guys were when they played SS in the minors, but they were at least good enough that there was no effort to learn a new position until they got to the major leagues.

Even right now, Manny Machado is a MLB third baseman and Jurickson Profar is a MLB second baseman, even though both guys are MLB caliber shortstops by all accounts.  And both are on teams where those moves could become permanent pretty easily.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 08, 2013, 08:58:07 am
From Little League on, most coaches put their best athletes at shortstop and pitcher.  If he's a lefty, first base and pitcher.

Besides Arod that somebody, I think, already mentioned.  Ernie Banks, Mickey Mantle, Paul Molitor, Dave Winfield, Robin Yount played shortstop before moving because of competition, team need, age, talent, or injury.  Actually, I can think of many more.  Is there a website that would tell us how many righties there are in the HOF who started out playing shortstop?  Bet there are a ton.  Even, gasp, Soriano started out at shortstop.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 08, 2013, 09:33:39 am
Heh heh, wasn't there a time when Soriano was considered the tool-prince of infielders and Cory Patterson the tools-prince of outfielders? 
Soriano was fast, quick, athletic, and had the great arm, exactly the tools you look for in projecting a great defensive SS. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 08, 2013, 09:33:42 am
From Little League on, most coaches put their best athletes at shortstop and pitcher.  If he's a lefty, first base and pitcher.

Besides Arod that somebody, I think, already mentioned.  Ernie Banks, Mickey Mantle, Paul Molitor, Dave Winfield, Robin Yount played shortstop before moving because of competition, team need, age, talent, or injury. 

Mentioning Mantle reminds me of another example of bloodlines not seeming to help a great deal.

Mickey Jr. did not get very far.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=mantle002mic

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 08, 2013, 10:08:45 am
The Dodgers had an All Star level shortstop by the name of Bill Russel who was moved to center field when a new shortstop emerged within the system.

I haven't read any research on the subject, but I would imagine that second base is the usual destination for shortstops that are moved because either the guy ahead of him or the guy behind him needs to play shortstop.  That was especially more common decades ago when very few shortstops had the power that was normally desired for playing third base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 08, 2013, 10:55:02 am
If the incumbent shortstop can hit with power, he moves to another power position, like the outfield, third, or first.  If he can't, he moves to second or utility.  And when none of that works, he moves to Japan or he sells cars.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 08, 2013, 12:08:21 pm
What a load of crap.  The Cubs had a shortstop named Scott who moved to third and then to utility without success.  But he neither went to Japan nor did he start selling cars.

I met him a few years ago selling real estate on Hilton Head.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on January 08, 2013, 12:49:03 pm
I still remember his wind-blown grand slam.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on January 08, 2013, 02:34:26 pm
I think it just seems that way because we generally forget that guys who moved that early were originally shortstops.  But there are plenty of cases where it happens...Ryne Sandberg played only 21 games anywhere but SS in his minor league career before he broke in.  Brandon Phillips played 14 games at 2B before making his MLB debut, but has only played a handful of games at SS in the majors.  Darwin Barney obviously moved off SS for Castro.  I don't have a good grasp of how good any of those guys were when they played SS in the minors, but they were at least good enough that there was no effort to learn a new position until they got to the major leagues.

Even right now, Manny Machado is a MLB third baseman and Jurickson Profar is a MLB second baseman, even though both guys are MLB caliber shortstops by all accounts.  And both are on teams where those moves could become permanent pretty easily.

Machado and Profar are interesting comps to Baez on their clubs.  Still, these guys came up at age 19 last season and will play other positions for awhile.  But, they are very likely to move back to SS in the near future.  They could play elsewhere for a year or two and still be ridiculously young as a starting SS.  O's had much success in 2012 with Hardy at SS and may wait a bit to move Machado back to SS and Rangers have to figure out what to do with Andrus. 

Unlike Sandberg and Phillips, Machado and Profar are natural SSs.  And Barney is not the type of offensive player that presents a quandry as to who stays at SS.  As to Bill Russell, he came up as an OFer and did not move off SS until his mid-30s, so I don't see how he is relevant.

But, the Machado/Profar comps are useful and maybe the approach should be to play Baez at 3B for a year or two when he comes up and make a trade decision later if it comes to that.  I strongly suspect that if both are natural shortstops, both will spend most of their careers at SS, somewhere.     
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 08, 2013, 02:38:18 pm
You are right, the switch went the other way, from center to shortstop.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 08, 2013, 02:50:02 pm
One reason Phillips and Sandberg might fit as a comp, or might at least give a reason to keep both: even if they weren't natural shortstops, both Phillips and Sandberg are/were clearly very good (maybe even elite) defensive second basemen.  Moving a natural shortstop to an easier position should have the same impact.  Any offensive advantage Baez (or Castro) loses by moving to 2B or 3B is likely to be offset by the fact that they'd likely be an elite (or close to it) defensive player at the easier position. 

Of course, this is all theoretical until we see how Villanueva, Candelario, and the third base/second base market in general develop over the next 2-3 years.  It may come to a point where there's not really an option but to keep them both...kind of where the Orioles are right now, only Castro will presumably be much more valuable than their incumbent JJ Hardy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 08, 2013, 03:08:21 pm
I was remembering it the other way around, too, and I should have realized I was right since it was Davep.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 08, 2013, 03:11:51 pm
BTW, it wouldn't shock me if Russell didn't play short in high school...just because he came up as an outfielder for the Dodgers doesn't mean that's how he was originally signed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 08, 2013, 04:45:00 pm
As to Bill Russell, he came up as an OFer and did not move off SS until his mid-30s, so I don't see how he is relevant.

Russell was on the NL All-Star team as a SS in 1973 at age 24.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/russebi01.shtml

He started as a backup OFer at age 20, but by the time he was a starter, at age 23, it was as a SS, and he was exclusively a SS for 11 years, before taking a utility role which included the OF for his last 3 years, but was still primarily at SS.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/russebi01.shtml
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 09, 2013, 07:50:05 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 13.  I've included Dolis as I think he qualifies as a rookie using BA standards (< 35 IP).

29.   RHRP Rafael Dolis 6'4" 215 Lb (198801) [2004-DO] 2011 SL allstar.  Hardest thrower in system. [2012 Cubs BA07] In 2012, 15/20 K/W in 30.1 ML IP (0.272 BAA). 14/6 K/W in 14 PCL IP (0.278 BAA).

30.   RHSwing Trey McNutt 6'4" 220 lb (198908)[2009-32, Shelton St. CC] [2012 Cubs BA04]. In 2012, repeated AA. 66/45 K/W in 95 IP (0.251 BAA).  Much lower BAA than 2011.  Solid FB.  Best curveball in system (BA2012)   

31.   RHSP Kyle Hendricks 6’3” 190 Lbs (198912) [2011-08, Dartmouth] Carolina mid-season all star (2012). In 2012, 123/18 K/W in 147.2 CAR/FSL IP (0.253 BAA).  Great control, 5 pitches, but only occasionally touches 90 mph. Best changeup/command in Carolina league.

32.   RHSP Barret Loux 6’5” 215 Lbs (198904) [2010-FA, Texas A&M] 6th overall pick in 2012 draft but failed physical due to shoulder injury.  Acquired by Cubs for Sota  (Replaced injured-Brigham)  In 2012, Texas League pitcher of the year with 100/41 K/W in 127 AA IP (0.251 BAA). Low 90s FB and average secondary pitches.  BA scouts underwhelmed say his ceiling is 5th starter.

33.   LHSP Brooks Raley 6'3" 185 Lbs (198806) [2009-06, TexasA&M]  [2011 Cubs BA26]    In 2012, 98/40 K/W in 130.2 combined SL/PCL IP (134 H; 9HR). 16/11 K/W in 24.1 MLB IP (0.317 BAA; 7 HR).  Features above average curveball but no true “out” pitch.

34.   RHSP Michael Jensen 6'1" 185 Lbs (199012) [2011-26, Hartnell(CA) JC] In 2012, 115/40 K/W in 140 MWL IP.  0.237 BAA vs righties & 0.189 BAA vs lefties.

35.   RHSP Jose Arias 6'5" 220 Lbs (199101) [DO] Mid 90s FB but secondary pitches need work. After spending 2011 in DSL posted 46/19 K/W in 63 NWL IP (0.258 BAA) in 2012.

36.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

37.   RHSP Ryan McNeil 6’3” 210 Lbs (199402) [2012-03, CA HS; $472K] 18/10 K/W in 20 AZL IP (0.264 BAA).  Multi-sport athlete with low 90s FB, slider, and changeup and sturdy frame. #185 BA top 500:

38.   RHSP Tayler Scott 6'3" 165 Lbs (199206) [2011-05, AZ HS via S Africa] (89-93 MPH FB and slow curve).   In 2012, Disappointing 43/29 K/W in 71 NWL IP (0.245 BAA). [NWL, #17, 2012]

39.   RHSP Jose Rosario 6'1" 170 Lbs (199008) [2008-FA] [2012 Cubs BA 22] 92-94 MPH FB.  In 2012, 95/34 K/W in 111 MWL IP (0.254 BAA vs righties but 0.316 vs lefties).

40.   2B Zeke DeVoss 5'10" 175 Lb S/R (199007) [2011-03, U of Miami] [2012 Cubs BA 14] in 2011, NWL#17.  In 2012, in MWL, 0.249/0.382/0.370 35/51 in SB attempts. 82 walks but mediocre BA and 118 K’s.

41.   LHSP Austin Kirk 6'1" 200 Lbs (199005) [2009-03, OK HS]  In 2012, 78/48 K/W in 129 FSL IP (120 HAA) followed by 13/12 K/W in 23 SL IP (18 HAA).  FSL 2012-mid-season allstar

42.   RHSP Matt Loosen 6'2" 205 lbs (198904) [2010-23, Jacksonville College]  In 2012, 110/46 K/W in 112 FSL IP (0.202 BAA led FSL starters).  Named to 2012 post-season FSL all star team.

43.   3B/2B/SS Stephen Bruno 5’9” 165 Lbs (199011) [2012-07, UVA; $149K] #13 in VA.  0.361/0.442/0.496 in 270 NWL PA after leading UVA in hitting with.362/.418/.549 line.  Versatile IF who led NWL in OBP  [NWL #15, 2012]. 

44.   C Justin Marra 5'11" 180 Lbs L/R (199301) [2011-15, Toronto HS].  Good receiver with solid arm.    0.322/0.457/0.467 line in 111 AZL PA. Impressive line but injury kept sample size small.

45.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

46.   Josh Conway 6’1” 175 Lbs (19910) [2012-04, Coastal Carolina; $343K] #208 BA Top 500: Featured mid-90’s FB before needing TJ surgery this spring. For Coastal Carolina, has 50/18 K/W in 55 IP.

47.   SS/2B Carlos Penalver 6'0" 170 Lbs R/R (199405) [2010-VZ, $550K]  In 2012, 0.273/0.341/0.322 in 202 AZL PA.  31/19 K/W and 7/11 in SB. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 09, 2013, 08:35:32 pm
Dolis,McNutt,DeVoss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 09, 2013, 08:43:50 pm
McNutt, Scott, Rodriguez, Loux, Contreras, Arias, Dolis, McNeil, Marra, Penalver, Kirk, Conway, DeVoss
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 10, 2013, 02:00:12 pm
Quote
Scott (Lincolnshire)


Klaw! Know anything about Gerardo Concepcion, the Cubs lefty Cuban? From what I've read he's appearing to be a $6 mil waste of money. Do you see any chance for him?

Klaw(1:27 PM)

I would agree with your characterization.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 10, 2013, 07:12:51 pm
New Cubs Regime Finds Team In Need Of Pitching

 By Phil Rogers
 January 10, 2013
 (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/email.gif)E-mail (?subject=Baseball%20America:%20New%20Cubs%20Regime%20Finds%20Team%20In%20Need%20Of%20Pitching&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseballamerica.com%2Fonline%2Fprospects%2Fprospect-pulse%2F2012%2F2614539.html) (http://www.baseballamerica.com/architecture/images/print.gif)Print
 
 CHICAGO—When Jason McLeod's cell phone rings, there's an explosion of guitars and percussion, with The Who soaring toward the epic vocals in "Baba O'Riley."
 
 Perhaps it's a subliminal reminder for McLeod about the key question hanging over the Cubs as they head toward the second season for the Theo Epstein regime. That is, who are the pitchers that will lead them back toward the postseason when they are once again contenders?
 
 For Epstein, Jed Hoyer and McLeod, the pitching landscape they inherited was a wasteland. A lack of pitching depth exacerbated by two midseason trades led directly to the Cubs' first 100-loss season since 1966, and the outlook for pitching—especially power pitching—was just as grim in the farm system. Nothing is more important for the new regime than addressing that shortage.
 
 "I love pitching, and I may be biased, but to me our long-term success will be built on a foundation of pitching in the minor leagues," McLeod said. "How we ultimately succeed—and Theo, Jed and everyone here agrees—is by building up our pitching, adding and developing our pitchers, especially power pitchers."
 
 Epstein's first year as Cubs president of baseball operations was marked by a buildup of young position players. First baseman Anthony Rizzo and outfielders Jorge Soler and Albert Almora were acquired to join shortstops Starlin Castro and Javier Baez and perhaps power-hitting first baseman Dan Vogelbach in forming an intriguing mix of parts to use in building a contender. But 2012 was a sobering one on the pitching front.
 
 "From an organizational depth standpoint, we have depth in the upper levels but we're lacking in impact power arms, especially starters," said McLeod, a club vice president who is essentially the scouting and farm director. "We have some interesting bullpen arms, but we're lacking in power starters."
 
 Hoyer, the general manager, and Epstein have said since last summer that rebuilding pitching is their goal. That was the focus when they traded Ryan Dempster and Paul Maholm for Arodys Vizcaino from the Braves and Kyle Hendricks and Barret Loux from the Rangers (after Jacob Brigham was deemed damaged goods and returned to Texas).
 
 While they didn't match the investments in Soler and Almora, the Cubs were able to sign Dominican righthander Juan Carlos Paniagua (who hit 100 mph on the radar gun in Mesa) and claim Missouri State's Pierce Johnson and high school righthanders Paul Blackburn and Duane Underwood in the draft.
 
 Dipping Into The College Ranks
 
 Their most significant pitching move to date probably came in November. That's when Epstein and his staff persuaded college pitching guru Derek Johnson to leave Vanderbilt and become the organization's minor league pitching coordinator. McLeod's phone was busy after the announcement.
 
 "I got a lot of calls and texts from around baseball," McLeod said. "They were saying, 'Wow!' and 'Great hire!' "
 
 Johnson, a native of Normal, Ill., is a lifelong Cubs fan who was an all-Mid-Continent Conference pitcher at Eastern Illinois and began his coaching career there in 1994. He spent the last 11 years as an assistant coach at Vanderbilt, with a highly decorated run as pitching coach. Johnson helped develop 32 pitchers who were drafted, including 2012 Cy Young Award winner David Price and fellow first-round picks Mike Minor and Sonny Gray. He's known for producing pitchers who throw a lot, with a highly structured system for long-tossing, and is considered a gifted teacher who adapts his style according to the strengths and weaknesses of pitchers.
 
 McLeod says Johnson's ideas fit well with those the new front office put into a manual for the organization. He said there have been some "tweaks" to the new Cubs' Way since Johnson's hiring, but that his influence will come mostly in one-on-one work.
 
 "I spend a lot of time striving to really get to know the player—where he's coming from, how he operates, how he competes—and studying what will make him better," Johnson said. "This game is about the players. It's not about my program . . . it's about figuring out how to foster a player's development."
 
 Johnson believes pitchers often "under-throw, under-prepare," but that doesn't mean the Cubs will have a one-size-fits-all approach to training pitchers.
 
 "What we do at Triple-A will be different from what we do in short-season (leagues), low A," he said. "We'll be trying to find certain things that will work for the individual."
 
 Restocking
 

 When Epstein was hired, the organization's most highly regarded pitching prospects were righthander Trey McNutt, who had dominated in the low minors in 2010, and righthander Dillon Maples, who signed for $2.5 million in the 14th round of the 2011 draft after turning down a chance to play football and baseball at North Carolina. McNutt's development stalled until he moved to the bullpen midway through 2012, and Maples worked 10 innings in the Rookie-level Arizona League in his pro debut last season, which raised questions about his delivery and his health. He remains an intriguing arm, however, throwing in the mid-90s at the Cubs' complex in Peoria, Ariz.
 
 Hayden Simpson, the Cubs' 2010 first-rounder, has never come close to throwing as well as he did at Southern Arkansas, leaving McLeod to say the hope remains he "finds his stuff again." Robert Whitenack, a pleasant surprise from SUNY Old Westbury, was added to the 40-man roster because of the promise he showed in 2011, but he hasn't been the same pitcher since having Tommy John surgery. Korean Dae-Eun Rhee will move to Triple-A in 2013 but hasn't shown more ceiling than former Texas A&M lefty Brooks Raley and Kentucky lefty Chris Rusin, who combined for a 7.17 ERA over 12 late-season starts with the Cubs.
 
 Matt Loosen, a 23rd-rounder in 2010 who won 11 games and struck out 110 in 113 innings at Daytona last season, is poised to put himself on the radar in 2013. But the pitchers who will be watched the closest are the ones who have arrived since last June, especially Johnson, Vizcaino and Paniagua.
 
 "If not for missing a couple of weeks during the (college) season with an elbow twinge, there's no way he would have been there (for us)," McLeod said of Pierce Johnson. "He's a first-round talent . . . quality arm, power curveball, runs his fastball up to 95, 96."
 
 McLeod says Vizcaino showed "electric stuff" in the Braves' bullpen in 2011, which was why Epstein wanted him even though Tommy John surgery wiped out his 2012. He's a risky proposition but could have a higher ceiling than Randall Delgado, whom Epstein was close to acquiring before Dempster blocked a trade with Atlanta. The Cubs expect Vizcaino back on the mound by March and at full strength by June, with a chance to show he can be a big leaguer in 2014, possibly at the front of the rotation.
 
 "We want to see what we have with him as a starter," McLeod said. "We've seen at times three quality pitches out of him—a big fastball, an electric slider (and a decent changeup)."
 
 Epstein says the first day of the draft is the most important of the year, and that's certainly true this time around. The Cubs will pick second and hope to land the same kind of talent that came with that pick in 2001, when Southern California's Mark Prior was available after the Twins took Joe Mauer first overall.
 
 It will be a shock if the Cubs don't take Indiana State lefty Sean Manaea or another power pitcher from the college ranks. Stanford's Mark Appel, Arkansas' Ryne Stanek, Mississippi's Bobby Wahl and Florida's duo of Jonathon Crawford and Karsten Whitson will be scouted closely.
 
 Manaea, who wasn't drafted out of high school, is the buzz guy after dominating the Cape Cod League in a summer when juiced balls led to an offensive explosion. He works in the mid-90s with a hard slider and has a funky delivery, like the White Sox's Chris Sale.
 
 Given the need for pitching, don't be surprised if the Cubs double up on college arms, as they only have to wait until the 39th pick to draft again.
 
 "You never know how a draft will unfold," McLeod said. "It would be very nice to be in that position. If something happens with a top guy, you might get two of them. The second pick is interesting too, not just the first one."
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 10, 2013, 07:14:41 pm
That might be one of the more informative things Phil Rogers has written in a while.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on January 10, 2013, 07:24:16 pm
Seriously, JR.
And, I've read here and there fans speculating that the Cubs can't focus only on pitching with their 1st round pick, but need to take the BPA. I don't buy it. It's hard to imagine a realistic scenario where they would take a position player over any of the top ranked college arms.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 10, 2013, 07:41:20 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 10.

22.   2B/SS Ronald Torreyes 5’9’ 140 Lbs R/R (199209) [2010, VZ][2012 Reds BA13] In 2012,0.264/0.326/0.385 in 453 FSL PA. 29/32 K/W.  Overcame slow start to have solid season.  Precocious but stature limits upsize.

23.   RHRP Kyuji Fujikawa 6’0” 190 Lbs (198007) [2012-JP] [2013 Cubs BA 09] In 2012, posted 58/15 K/W in 47 IP as closer in Japan. 91-93 mph FB with plus plus splitter.

24.   2B Gioskar Amaya: 5'11" 175 lb R/R MI (199212) [2009-VZ] [NWL #9 2012; 2012 Short-season All Star BA; 2013 Cubs BA 21] In 2012, 0.298/0.381/0.496 in 335 NWL PA.

25.   RHSwing Hector Rondon 6’3” 180 Lbs (198802) [2004-VZ, Rule5(2012)] In 2009, 73/16 K/W in 72 EL IP followed by 64/13 K/W in 74 IL IP. Elbow woes led to TJ surgery in 2010 and fracture in 2011.  Missed most of 2010 and nearly all of 2011/2012. Mid 90s FB when healthy.

26.   SS Marco Hernandez S/R 6'0" 170 Lbs (199209) [2009-DO] [NWL #6, 2012, 2012 Cubs BA 16; 2012 BA AZL#6]. Solid fielder with average-SS arm but can he hit enough? In 2012, 0.548 (0.726) OPS in 169 (279) MWL (NWL) PA. Concerning 76/19 K/W.

27.   CF/RF/LF Jae-Hoon Ha 6'1" 185 Lbs R/R (199010) [2008-KO] [2012 Cubs BA 18; best def OF in system (BA2012)]   0.279/0.315/0.413 in 556 PA split between FSL(312)&SL(244). 67/23 K/W. Power suffered a bit after promotion. 13 SB in 30 attempts. [2011 Cubs BA28] 

28.   RHSP Robert Whitenack 6'5" 185 Lbs (198811) [2009-08, SUNY Old Westbury] [2012 Cubs BA 19] In 2012, struggling to recover from TJS. 31/27 K/W in 51.1 FSL IP (0.332 BAA). In 2011, before blowing out arm, dominated in FSL and pitched very well in AA 22/13 K/W in 37 AA IP.

29.   RHRP Rafael Dolis 6'4" 215 Lb (198801) [2004-DO] 2011 SL allstar.  Hardest thrower in system. [2012 Cubs BA07] In 2012, 15/20 K/W in 30.1 ML IP (0.272 BAA). 14/6 K/W in 14 PCL IP (0.278 BAA).

30.   RHSwing Trey McNutt 6'4" 220 lb (198908)[2009-32, Shelton St. CC] [2012 Cubs BA04]. In 2012, repeated AA. 66/45 K/W in 95 IP (0.251 BAA).  Much lower BAA than 2011.  Solid FB.  Best curveball in system (BA2012)   

31.   2B Zeke DeVoss 5'10" 175 Lb S/R (199007) [2011-03, U of Miami] [2012 Cubs BA 14] in 2011, NWL#17.  In 2012, in MWL, 0.249/0.382/0.370 35/51 in SB attempts. 82 walks but mediocre BA and 118 K’s.

32.   RHSP Barret Loux 6’5” 215 Lbs (198904) [2010-FA, Texas A&M] 6th overall pick in 2012 draft but failed physical due to shoulder injury.  Acquired by Cubs for Sota  (Replaced injured-Brigham)  In 2012, Texas League pitcher of the year with 100/41 K/W in 127 AA IP (0.251 BAA). Low 90s FB and average secondary pitches.  BA scouts underwhelmed say his ceiling is 5th starter.

33.   RHSP Jose Arias 6'5" 220 Lbs (199101) [DO] Mid 90s FB but secondary pitches need work. After spending 2011 in DSL posted 46/19 K/W in 63 NWL IP (0.258 BAA) in 2012.

34.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

35.   RHSP Ryan McNeil 6’3” 210 Lbs (199402) [2012-03, CA HS; $472K] 18/10 K/W in 20 AZL IP (0.264 BAA).  Multi-sport athlete with low 90s FB, slider, and changeup and sturdy frame. #185 BA top 500:

36.   RHSP Tayler Scott 6'3" 165 Lbs (199206) [2011-05, AZ HS via S Africa] (89-93 MPH FB and slow curve).   In 2012, Disappointing 43/29 K/W in 71 NWL IP (0.245 BAA). [NWL, #17, 2012]

37.   RHSP Josh Conway 6’1” 175 Lbs (19910) [2012-04, Coastal Carolina; $343K] #208 BA Top 500: Featured mid-90’s FB before needing TJ surgery this spring. For Coastal Carolina, has 50/18 K/W in 55 IP.

38.   LHSP Austin Kirk 6'1" 200 Lbs (199005) [2009-03, OK HS]  In 2012, 78/48 K/W in 129 FSL IP (120 HAA) followed by 13/12 K/W in 23 SL IP (18 HAA).  FSL 2012-mid-season allstar
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 10, 2013, 09:08:34 pm
Torreyez, Fujikawa, Amaya, Rondon, Hernandez, Whitenack.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 11, 2013, 01:07:07 am
Amaya, Fujikawa, Hernandez, Ha, McNutt, Whitenack, Scott, Contreras, Dolis, Rondon.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 11, 2013, 07:19:16 am
Fujikawa,Whitenack,Dolis,McNutt,DeVoss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 11, 2013, 11:52:23 am
Fujikawa,Whitenack,Dolis,McNutt,DeVoss.

Let's see, Torreyes is two years younger than DeVoss, and has a better 2012 hitting line than DeVoss at a higher level, and Torreyes had a better hitting line that DeVoss in 2011 by an even wider margin and at a higher level, their steal rate is comparable (51-21 for DeVoss and 50-28 for Torreyes) and they play the same position with Torreyes having a .985 fielding % and DeVoss a .942.... so DeVoss rates ahead of Torreyes.

Sure.

Makes sense to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 11, 2013, 12:52:43 pm
JR, thanks for the Rogers article with the McLeod quotes.  The enthusiasm for Derek Johnson seems sincere.  It would be pretty neat if he really does turn out to be really effective.  Not sure how it's worked in the past, but that would seem to be a position that could be really influential if you have the right guy running it. 

I found the comment on "power pitchers" interesting.  Sandwich Blackburn doesn't appear to be a power arm, nor 3rd-round McNeil, and at the big-league level pickups like Wood, Feldman, and Villanueva have not indicated a huge preoccupation with power arms. 

"Epstein says the first day of the draft is the most important of the year, and that's certainly true this time around."  Perhaps they will again figure that the rest of the draft can take care of itself, but really you need to commit everything you've got to get the best guy on your first pick. 


Will be interesting this draft being 2nd in round two. There's going to be a bunch of kids left who hoped go in the first.  McLeod should have a crazy night calling to find out which will be signable at the top of the 2nd round. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 11, 2013, 04:48:57 pm
JR, thanks for the Rogers article with the McLeod quotes.  The enthusiasm for Derek Johnson seems sincere.  It would be pretty neat if he really does turn out to be really effective.  Not sure how it's worked in the past, but that would seem to be a position that could be really influential if you have the right guy running it. 

I found the comment on "power pitchers" interesting.  Sandwich Blackburn doesn't appear to be a power arm, nor 3rd-round McNeil, and at the big-league level pickups like Wood, Feldman, and Villanueva have not indicated a huge preoccupation with power arms.   

To me this says they view "power arms" as the arms needed for top of the rotation starters on a strong team... but we are a long way from there, and at the moment most of the 2013 starting pitchers will be little more than roster fill, or pitchers the Theocracy hopes to flip at some point for someone else of value.  Assuming the Cubs do not develop them internally in the next couple of years, the Theocracy will likely pursue power arms at the point they believe one or two would be the missing ingredient to put the team over the top.

Until then, not so much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 11, 2013, 04:54:58 pm
1) Ronald Torreyes
2) Kyuji Fujikawa
3)Gioskar Amaya
4) Hector Rondon
5) Rafael Dolis
6) Marco Hernandez
7) Jae-Hoon Ha
8) Robert Whitenack
9) Ryan McNeil
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 11, 2013, 07:00:30 pm
Last year, the Cubs had several pitchers that would probably qualify as roster fill.  Germano, Lopez, Ascensio, Berken and others.  But I don't think that there will be many on the roster this year that fit that description, at least at the start of the season.  Baker, Feldman and Villanueva are probably not "power arms", but they are certainly several levels above the aforementioned roster fill.  And I don't think that there will be the mass "flipping" of pitchers this summer.  Some, certainly, but I think that the Front Office is much happier with their staff this year than they were last year at this time.  And I doubt that any staff has ever had 12 strike-throwing power pitchers at one time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 11, 2013, 07:03:54 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 10.

15.   SS/3B/LF Junior Lake 6'3" 215 Lb R/R (199003) [2007-DO] 109/19 K/W. 0.315/0.336/0.498 in 203 FSL AB.  0.248/0.300/0.380 in 242 SL AB.  [2011 Cubs BA27, 2012 Cubs BA08] Best IF arm in system (BA2012). Flashes of brilliance but lacks consistency

16.   RHRP Alberto Cabrera 6'4" 210 Lb (198810) [DO]. [2013 Cubs BA 13] In 2012, became full time reliever.  45/10 K/W in 35.2 SL IP (0.217 BAA). 29/4 K/W in 19.1 PCL IP but allowed 29 hits. 18/11 K/W in 13.1 ML IP (0.224 BAA).

17.   RHSP Dillon Maples 6'3" 195 Lbs (199205) [2011-14] $2.5M bonus. (#46 draft prospect BA-2011) Plus FB and curve but below-average command.  “Minor” injury delayed his 2012 debut until late July [2012 Cubs BA05] In 2012, 12/10 K/W in 10.1 AZL IP (0.162 BAA).

18.   RHRP Tony Zych 6'3" 188 Lbs (199008) [2011-04, Louisville] [2012 Cubs BA 15] Works at 94-97.  In 2012, 36/7 K/W in 36.2 FSL IP (0.239 BAA). 28/12 K/W in 24.2 SL IP (0.268 BAA).

19.   RHSP Ben Wells 6'3" 220 Lbs (199209) [2010-07, Ark HS] [2012 Cubs BA 25] NWL#12
Solid sinker (92-94 MPH FB with knee-buckling slider and developing split-finger). 36/12 K/W in 44.0 MWL IP (0.274 BAA). Elbow concerns (missed 2 months in 2012) cloud his 2013 status.

20.   RHSP Paul Blackburn 6’2” 185 lbs (199312) [2012-01s, CA HS;$912K]. In 2012, threw hard but lacked knockout pitch. 13/7 K/W in 20.2 AZL IP (0.284 BAA).  Plus curve.  Has pitchability.  Polished for HS pick.

21.   3B Jeimer Candelario 6'0" 185 Lb B/R (199311) [2010, DO via New York] [2013 Cubs BA 08; NWL#7, 2012] Spent 2011 in DSL.  Skipped AZL. In 2012, 0.281/0.345/0.396 in304 NWL PA. Projectable frame.

22.   RHRP Kyuji Fujikawa 6’0” 190 Lbs (198007) [2012-JP] [2013 Cubs BA 09] In 2012, posted 58/15 K/W in 47 IP as closer in Japan. 91-93 mph FB with plus plus splitter.

23.   RHSP Robert Whitenack 6'5" 185 Lbs (198811) [2009-08, SUNY Old Westbury] [2012 Cubs BA 19] In 2012, struggling to recover from TJS. 31/27 K/W in 51.1 FSL IP (0.332 BAA). In 2011, before blowing out arm, dominated in FSL and pitched very well in AA 22/13 K/W in 37 AA IP.

24.   2B Gioskar Amaya: 5'11" 175 lb R/R MI (199212) [2009-VZ] [NWL #9 2012; 2012 Short-season All Star BA; 2013 Cubs BA 21] In 2012, 0.298/0.381/0.496 in 335 NWL PA.

25.   RHSwing Hector Rondon 6’3” 180 Lbs (198802) [2004-VZ, Rule5(2012)] In 2009, 73/16 K/W in 72 EL IP followed by 64/13 K/W in 74 IL IP. Elbow woes led to TJ surgery in 2010 and fracture in 2011.  Missed most of 2010 and nearly all of 2011/2012. Mid 90s FB when healthy.

26.   SS Marco Hernandez S/R 6'0" 170 Lbs (199209) [2009-DO] [NWL #6, 2012, 2012 Cubs BA 16; 2012 BA AZL#6]. Solid fielder with average-SS arm but can he hit enough? In 2012, 0.548 (0.726) OPS in 169 (279) MWL (NWL) PA. Concerning 76/19 K/W.

27.   RHRP Rafael Dolis 6'4" 215 Lb (198801) [2004-DO] 2011 SL allstar.  Hardest thrower in system. [2012 Cubs BA07] In 2012, 15/20 K/W in 30.1 ML IP (0.272 BAA). 14/6 K/W in 14 PCL IP (0.278 BAA).

28.   2B/SS Ronald Torreyes 5’9’ 140 Lbs R/R (199209) [2010, VZ][2012 Reds BA13] In 2012,0.264/0.326/0.385 in 453 FSL PA. 29/32 K/W.  Overcame slow start to have solid season.  Precocious but stature limits upside.

29.   CF/RF/LF Jae-Hoon Ha 6'1" 185 Lbs R/R (199010) [2008-KO] [2012 Cubs BA 18; best def OF in system (BA2012)]   0.279/0.315/0.413 in 556 PA split between FSL(312)&SL(244). 67/23 K/W. Power suffered a bit after promotion. 13 SB in 30 attempts. [2011 Cubs BA28] 

30.   RHSwing Trey McNutt 6'4" 220 lb (198908)[2009-32, Shelton St. CC] [2012 Cubs BA04]. In 2012, repeated AA. 66/45 K/W in 95 IP (0.251 BAA).  Much lower BAA than 2011.  Solid FB.  Best curveball in system (BA2012)   

31.   2B Zeke DeVoss 5'10" 175 Lb S/R (199007) [2011-03, U of Miami] [2012 Cubs BA 14] in 2011, NWL#17.  In 2012, in MWL, 0.249/0.382/0.370 35/51 in SB attempts. 82 walks but mediocre BA and 118 K’s.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 11, 2013, 08:48:53 pm
Lake,Cabrera,Maples,Blackburn,Candelario,Fujikawa,Whitenack,Dolis,McNutt,DeVoss.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 11, 2013, 09:01:38 pm
Last year, the Cubs had several pitchers that would probably qualify as roster fill.  Germano, Lopez, Ascensio, Berken and others.  But I don't think that there will be many on the roster this year that fit that description, at least at the start of the season.  Baker, Feldman and Villanueva are probably not "power arms", but they are certainly several levels above the aforementioned roster fill.  And I don't think that there will be the mass "flipping" of pitchers this summer.  Some, certainly, but I think that the Front Office is much happier with their staff this year than they were last year at this time.

at the moment most of the 2013 starting pitchers will be little more than roster fill, or pitchers the Theocracy hopes to flip at some point for someone else of value.

davep, I certainly hope the Theocracy is much happier with the 2013 staff than the 2012 staff, but not because it will allow them to get more value on flipping them.

Aside from Smardz and Jackson (and perhaps Lendy Castillo), I doubt there are any pitchers on the Cubs 40 many roster who will start a single game in 2013 who will still be pitching for the Cubs when the team next makes the playoffs.

Aside from Smardz and Garza the effective starters the Cubs had last year were flipped, and Garza would have been flipped if he had been healthy.  I suspect the same will be true in 2013.

So if the pitchers in 2013 are a good deal better than in 2012, most are likely to be peddled, because they are simply not the kind of pitchers the Theocracy are likely to want to build around.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 11, 2013, 09:09:10 pm
1. Ben Wells
2. Jeimer Candelario
3. Ronald Torreyes
4. Fujikawa
5. Tony Zych
6. Gioskar Amaya
7. Hector Rondon
8. Rafael Dolis
9. Marco Hernandez
10. Jae-Hoon Ha
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 11, 2013, 09:34:26 pm
Aside from Smardz and Jackson (and perhaps Lendy Castillo), I doubt there are any pitchers on the Cubs 40 many roster who will start a single game in 2013 who will still be pitching for the Cubs when the team next makes the playoffs.

I think that Hoyer and the others believe there is a good chance that they can make the playoffs in 2014, and will not trade players that are signed for 2014 that can not be easily replaced on the free agent market.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 11, 2013, 11:07:59 pm
I think that Hoyer and the others believe there is a good chance that they can make the playoffs in 2014, and will not trade players that are signed for 2014 that can not be easily replaced on the free agent market.

We will see.

If they don't make such trades, based simply on the belief that they have a chance of making the playoffs in 2014 with a marginal team unlikely to go anywhere, and in the process pass on the chance of meaningfully strengthening the team for the long haul with some nice prospects, I will be really disappointed in them, and they will have strayed from the long term plans they have set out multiple times before.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 12, 2013, 12:03:13 am
Their plan is to build a fundamentally sound team that can compete on a continual basis with other top teams.  It is not a one, two or three year plan, and if they continue to build their procurement system, farm system and major league team, through increased and improved administrative staff, amateur and free agent signings and appropriate trades, they will indeed be working within the plan they set out multiple times before.

And if they continue to improve system wide over the next year and a half, especially with a couple of high value free agent signings next winter, their team has a good chance to be much better than a marginal team unlikely to go anywhere.  It can go into 2014 with a team able to compete in the playoffs and still look to the the future in 2015 when their top prospects in the farm system are ready to be eased into major league play.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 12, 2013, 02:34:33 am
Candelario, Maples, Lake, Wells, Cabrera, Zych, Fujikawa, Amaya. McNutt, Hernandez
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 12, 2013, 07:56:29 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 12.

8.   CF/RF Brett Jackson 6'2" 210 Lbs L/R (198808) [2009-01, U California] BA#38(2011) [2013 Cubs BA05] In 2012, 0.256/0.338/0.479 in 454 PCL PA. 0.644 OPS in 142 MLB PA.  Four above average tools (bat is average)

9.   3B Josh Vitters 6'2" 200 Lbs R/R (198908) [2007-01, Cal HS] [ 2012CubsBA09]  In 2012, 0.304/0.356/0.513 in 445 PCL PA. Woeful 0.395 OPS in 106 ML PA overshadowed solid AAA season. 

10.   CF/RF/LF Matt Szczur 6'1" 195 Lb R/R (198907) [2010-05, Villanova]  [2011 Cubs BA07, 2012 Cubs BA03]. 0.801 OPS in FSL (442 PA) led to promotion to SL where he posted disappointing 0.641 OPS (157 PA). 38/50 SB in FSL 4/6 in SL.

11.   SS/3B Arismendy Alcantara 5'10" 160 Lbs S/R (199110) (2008-DO) [2013 Cubs BA 10] 0.302/0.339/0.447 in 350 FSL PA. 25/29 in SB. BA Best (if erratic) IF arm in FSL (2012).  Injury limited sample size but 2012 was a breakout season.

12.   RHP Juan Carlos Paniagua 6’1” 195 Lbs [199004, DR] [2013 Cubs BA 11] $1.5M bonus after international bonus cap. Mid 90’s FB, nasty slider with good command.  Played winterball in Panama.  In 2012, 4/1 K/W in 3 AZL IP.

13.   SS/CF Logan Watkins 5'11" 170 LB (198908) [2008-21, KS HS] [2013 Cubs BA19;2012 AA Allstar BA] OPS of 0.689/0.756/0.805 in MWL/FSL/SL during 2010/11/12.  28/35 in SB and 76 BB in SL.

14.   RHSP Duane Underwood 6’2” 205 Lbs  (199407) [2012-02, GA HS; $770K] Underwood was 6-1 with a 2.36 ERA for Pope High School in Marietta, Ga., this past spring, striking out 75 and walking 34 in 50 1/3 innings. Mid 90’s FB and solid curve. 8.2 IP & 7/6 K/W for Mesa. 0.206 BAA.

15.   3B Jeimer Candelario 6'0" 185 Lb B/R (199311) [2010, DO via New York] [2013 Cubs BA 08; NWL#7, 2012] Spent 2011 in DSL.  Skipped AZL. In 2012, 0.281/0.345/0.396 in304 NWL PA. Projectable frame.

16.   RHRP Kyuji Fujikawa 6’0” 190 Lbs (198007) [2012-JP] [2013 Cubs BA 09] In 2012, posted 58/15 K/W in 47 IP as closer in Japan. 91-93 mph FB with plus plus splitter.

17.   SS/3B/LF Junior Lake 6'3" 215 Lb R/R (199003) [2007-DO] 109/19 K/W. 0.315/0.336/0.498 in 203 FSL AB.  0.248/0.300/0.380 in 242 SL AB.  [2011 Cubs BA27, 2012 Cubs BA08] Best IF arm in system (BA2012). Flashes of brilliance but lacks consistency

18.   RHRP Alberto Cabrera 6'4" 210 Lb (198810) [DO]. [2013 Cubs BA 13] In 2012, became full time reliever.  45/10 K/W in 35.2 SL IP (0.217 BAA). 29/4 K/W in 19.1 PCL IP but allowed 29 hits. 18/11 K/W in 13.1 ML IP (0.224 BAA).

19.   RHSP Dillon Maples 6'3" 195 Lbs (199205) [2011-14] $2.5M bonus. (#46 draft prospect BA-2011) Plus FB and curve but below-average command.  “Minor” injury delayed his 2012 debut until late July [2012 Cubs BA05] In 2012, 12/10 K/W in 10.1 AZL IP (0.162 BAA).

20.   RHRP Tony Zych 6'3" 188 Lbs (199008) [2011-04, Louisville] [2012 Cubs BA 15] Works at 94-97.  In 2012, 36/7 K/W in 36.2 FSL IP (0.239 BAA). 28/12 K/W in 24.2 SL IP (0.268 BAA).

21.   RHSP Ben Wells 6'3" 220 Lbs (199209) [2010-07, Ark HS] [2012 Cubs BA 25] NWL#12
Solid sinker (92-94 MPH FB with knee-buckling slider and developing split-finger). 36/12 K/W in 44.0 MWL IP (0.274 BAA). Elbow concerns (missed 2 months in 2012) cloud his 2013 status.

22.   2B Gioskar Amaya: 5'11" 175 lb R/R MI (199212) [2009-VZ] [NWL #9 2012; 2012 Short-season All Star BA; 2013 Cubs BA 21] In 2012, 0.298/0.381/0.496 in 335 NWL PA.

23.   SS Marco Hernandez S/R 6'0" 170 Lbs (199209) [2009-DO] [NWL #6, 2012, 2012 Cubs BA 16; 2012 BA AZL#6]. Solid fielder with average-SS arm but can he hit enough? In 2012, 0.548 (0.726) OPS in 169 (279) MWL (NWL) PA. Concerning 76/19 K/W.

24.   RHRP Rafael Dolis 6'4" 215 Lb (198801) [2004-DO] 2011 SL allstar.  Hardest thrower in system. [2012 Cubs BA07] In 2012, 15/20 K/W in 30.1 ML IP (0.272 BAA). 14/6 K/W in 14 PCL IP (0.278 BAA).

25.   RHSP Paul Blackburn 6’2” 185 lbs (199312) [2012-01s, CA HS;$912K]. In 2012, threw hard but lacked knockout pitch. 13/7 K/W in 20.2 AZL IP (0.284 BAA).  Plus curve.  Has pitchability.  Polished for HS pick.

26.   RHSwing Hector Rondon 6’3” 180 Lbs (198802) [2004-VZ, Rule5(2012)] In 2009, 73/16 K/W in 72 EL IP followed by 64/13 K/W in 74 IL IP. Elbow woes led to TJ surgery in 2010 and fracture in 2011.  Missed most of 2010 and nearly all of 2011/2012. Mid 90s FB when healthy.

27.   RHSwing Trey McNutt 6'4" 220 lb (198908)[2009-32, Shelton St. CC] [2012 Cubs BA04]. In 2012, repeated AA. 66/45 K/W in 95 IP (0.251 BAA).  Much lower BAA than 2011.  Solid FB.  Best curveball in system (BA2012)   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 12, 2013, 08:47:11 pm
Jackson,Vitters,Szczur,Paniagua,Underwood,Candelario,Fujikawa,Lake,Maples,Dolis,Blackburn,McNutt.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 12, 2013, 10:10:40 pm
1. Jackson
2. Ben Wells
3. Jeimer Candelario
4. Szcuzur
5. Fujikawa
6. Paniagua
7. Vitters
8. Tony Zych
9. Gioskar Amaya
10. Hector Rondon
11. Watkins
12. Underwood
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 13, 2013, 12:17:47 am
Jackson, Candelario, Paniagua, Szczur, Lake, Maples, Cabrera, Fujikawa, Alcantara, Amaya, Wells, Zych
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 13, 2013, 06:54:31 pm
Today's list of prospects.  Vote for up to 13.

1.   SS Javier Baez 6'1" 205 lbs R/R (199212) [2011-01, FL HS] BA Most exciting player in FSL (2012) [2013 Cubs BA01] 0.979 OPS in 222 MWL PA followed by 0.644 OPS in small (93 PA) FSL sample.  24/29 SB.  Electric bat speed and strong arm.

2.   CF Albert Almora 6’1” 170 Lbs R/R (199404) [2012-01, FL HS; $3.25M] [2013 Cubs BA 02] 0.321/0.331/0.464 in 142 PA between AZL & NWL.  Quick bat. Best defensive player in 2012 draft (BA). Perhaps the most polished HS player in 2012 draft.

3.   RF Jorge Soler 6’3” 205 Lbs R/R (199202) [2012- Cuba, $30M] [2013 Cubs BA 03] After shaking rust off in AZL, hit 0.338/0.398/0.513 in 95 MWL PA. Explosive power and some speed.

4.   RHSwing Arodys Vizcaino 6’0” 190 Lbs (199011) [2007-DR(Yankees), from Braves July 2012] [2013 Cubs BA 04] March 2012 TJ surgery. In 2011 100/28 K/W in 97 IP at 3 different minor league levels (0.225 BAA).   When healthy features mid 90s FB and plus plus curve.

5.   RHSP Pierce Johnson 6’3” 170 Lbs (199105) [2012-01s, Missouri State; $1.2M][2013 Cubs BA06]  in 2012, 12/3 K/W in 8 NWL IP (10 Hits) Lively low 90s FB, hard curve, and effective changeup.  Early spring forearm strain likely caused him to slide to supplemental round.

6.   1B Dan Vogelbach 6'0" 240 Lb L/R (199212) [2011-02, FL HS] [2013 Cubs BA07; NWL #2, 2012; 2012 BA short-season all-star] Began in AZL due to poor spring training but was promoted to NWL mid-season and crushed pitching in both leagues. Combined 0.322/0.410/0.641 in 280 PA. Minus minus speed with minus glove.

7.   3B Christian Villaneuva 5’11” 160 lbs R/R (199106) [2009-MX, for Dempster] [2013 Cubs BA 12]. 0.279/0.353/0.427 in 493 high-A PA.  Small in stature but has speed (32 SB) and surprising power (17 HR). 

8.   CF/RF Brett Jackson 6'2" 210 Lbs L/R (198808) [2009-01, U California] BA#38(2011) [2013 Cubs BA05] In 2012, 0.256/0.338/0.479 in 454 PCL PA. 0.644 OPS in 142 MLB PA.  Four above average tools (bat is average)

9.   CF/RF/LF Matt Szczur 6'1" 195 Lb R/R (198907) [2010-05, Villanova]  [2011 Cubs BA07, 2012 Cubs BA03]. 0.801 OPS in FSL (442 PA) led to promotion to SL where he posted disappointing 0.641 OPS (157 PA). 38/50 SB in FSL 4/6 in SL.

10.   RHP Juan Carlos Paniagua 6’1” 195 Lbs [199004, DR] [2013 Cubs BA 11] $1.5M bonus after international bonus cap. Mid 90’s FB, nasty slider with good command.  Played winterball in Panama.  In 2012, 4/1 K/W in 3 AZL IP.

11.   3B Jeimer Candelario 6'0" 185 Lb B/R (199311) [2010, DO via New York] [2013 Cubs BA 08; NWL#7, 2012] Spent 2011 in DSL.  Skipped AZL. In 2012, 0.281/0.345/0.396 in304 NWL PA. Projectable frame.

12.   3B Josh Vitters 6'2" 200 Lbs R/R (198908) [2007-01, Cal HS] [ 2012CubsBA09]  In 2012, 0.304/0.356/0.513 in 445 PCL PA. Woeful 0.395 OPS in 106 ML PA overshadowed solid AAA season. 

13.   RHSP Duane Underwood 6’2” 205 Lbs  (199407) [2012-02, GA HS; $770K] Underwood was 6-1 with a 2.36 ERA for Pope High School in Marietta, Ga., this past spring, striking out 75 and walking 34 in 50 1/3 innings. Mid 90’s FB and solid curve. 8.2 IP & 7/6 K/W for Mesa. 0.206 BAA.

14.   RHRP Kyuji Fujikawa 6’0” 190 Lbs (198007) [2012-JP] [2013 Cubs BA 09] In 2012, posted 58/15 K/W in 47 IP as closer in Japan. 91-93 mph FB with plus plus splitter.

15.   SS/3B/LF Junior Lake 6'3" 215 Lb R/R (199003) [2007-DO] 109/19 K/W. 0.315/0.336/0.498 in 203 FSL AB.  0.248/0.300/0.380 in 242 SL AB.  [2011 Cubs BA27, 2012 Cubs BA08] Best IF arm in system (BA2012). Flashes of brilliance but lacks consistency

16.   RHSP Dillon Maples 6'3" 195 Lbs (199205) [2011-14] $2.5M bonus. (#46 draft prospect BA-2011) Plus FB and curve but below-average command.  “Minor” injury delayed his 2012 debut until late July [2012 Cubs BA05] In 2012, 12/10 K/W in 10.1 AZL IP (0.162 BAA).

17.   RHSP Ben Wells 6'3" 220 Lbs (199209) [2010-07, Ark HS] [2012 Cubs BA 25] NWL#12
Solid sinker (92-94 MPH FB with knee-buckling slider and developing split-finger). 36/12 K/W in 44.0 MWL IP (0.274 BAA). Elbow concerns (missed 2 months in 2012) cloud his 2013 status.

18.   SS/3B Arismendy Alcantara 5'10" 160 Lbs S/R (199110) (2008-DO) [2013 Cubs BA 10] 0.302/0.339/0.447 in 350 FSL PA. 25/29 in SB. BA Best (if erratic) IF arm in FSL (2012).  Injury limited sample size but 2012 was a breakout season.

19.   SS/CF Logan Watkins 5'11" 170 LB (198908) [2008-21, KS HS] [2013 Cubs BA19;2012 AA Allstar BA] OPS of 0.689/0.756/0.805 in MWL/FSL/SL during 2010/11/12.  28/35 in SB and 76 BB in SL.

20.   RHRP Alberto Cabrera 6'4" 210 Lb (198810) [DO]. [2013 Cubs BA 13] In 2012, became full time reliever.  45/10 K/W in 35.2 SL IP (0.217 BAA). 29/4 K/W in 19.1 PCL IP but allowed 29 hits. 18/11 K/W in 13.1 ML IP (0.224 BAA).

21.   2B Gioskar Amaya: 5'11" 175 lb R/R MI (199212) [2009-VZ] [NWL #9 2012; 2012 Short-season All Star BA; 2013 Cubs BA 21] In 2012, 0.298/0.381/0.496 in 335 NWL PA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 13, 2013, 07:50:01 pm
Sorry Dallen - I have lost track.  What are we voting for?  The 13 best prospects?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 13, 2013, 09:55:41 pm
3.   RF Jorge Soler  Not quite Baez-esque tools.  But more disciplined swing. 
1.   SS Javier Baez Top tools, but more red flags.
2.   CF Albert Almora Very good prospect, but no elite tools, no elite power, and thus far takes no walks. 
4.   RHSwing Arodys Vizcaino   Could be excellent if stuff and control all come back
6.   1B Dan Vogelbach Elite hitting profile, as good or better than any of big 3. 
5.   RHSP Pierce Johnson   
10.   RHP Juan Carlos Paniagua 
8.   CF/RF Brett Jackson  Lots to like.  Can he hit? 
9.   CF/RF/LF Matt Szczur   Future Michael Bourn?   
11.   3B Jeimer Candelario 
13.   RHSP Duane Underwood   
16.   RHSP Dillon Maples   Paniagua, Underwood, Maples, all seem to have big arms and high ceilings.  Aren't all going to stay healthy and work out, but who's to guess which one will?  The ceilings for the three are so much higher than the following guys, that I'm putting them higher despite the much higher failure risk. 
7.   3B Christian Villaneuva     Will he hit enough? 
14.   RHRP Kyuji Fujikawa      Out of context, no idea where to place him. 
20.   RHRP Alberto Cabrera    Big speed, sometimes sharp slider, sometimes throws strikes.  Hasn't shown the command, but the stuff is there.
12.   3B Josh Vitters   
18.   SS/3B Arismendy Alcantara     
19.   SS/CF Logan Watkins
21.   2B Gioskar Amaya: Alcantara, Watkins, and Amaya (as well as Torreyes) all in the 2B pool.  Question marks on all of them.  But hopefully out of the bunch you'll get one who works out.
17.   RHSP Ben Wells      If healthy, move him up a bunch.   
15.   SS/3B/LF Junior Lake    Not a fan.  Undisciplined/unreliable fielder and hitter, can't make contact. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 13, 2013, 10:20:47 pm
3.   RF Jorge Soler  Not quite Baez-esque tools.  But more disciplined swing. 
1.   SS Javier Baez Top tools, but more red flags.
2.   CF Albert Almora Very good prospect, but no elite tools, no elite power, and thus far takes no walks. 
4.   RHSwing Arodys Vizcaino   Could be excellent if stuff and control all come back
6.   1B Dan Vogelbach Elite hitting profile, as good or better than any of big 3. 
5.   RHSP Pierce Johnson   
10.   RHP Juan Carlos Paniagua 
8.   CF/RF Brett Jackson  Lots to like.  Can he hit? 
9.   CF/RF/LF Matt Szczur   Future Michael Bourn?   
11.   3B Jeimer Candelario 
13.   RHSP Duane Underwood   
16.   RHSP Dillon Maples   Paniagua, Underwood, Maples, all seem to have big arms and high ceilings.  Aren't all going to stay healthy and work out, but who's to guess which one will?  The ceilings for the three are so much higher than the following guys, that I'm putting them higher despite the much higher failure risk. 
7.   3B Christian Villaneuva     Will he hit enough? 
14.   RHRP Kyuji Fujikawa      Out of context, no idea where to place him. 
20.   RHRP Alberto Cabrera    Big speed, sometimes sharp slider, sometimes throws strikes.  Hasn't shown the command, but the stuff is there.
12.   3B Josh Vitters   
18.   SS/3B Arismendy Alcantara     
19.   SS/CF Logan Watkins
21.   2B Gioskar Amaya: Alcantara, Watkins, and Amaya (as well as Torreyes) all in the 2B pool.  Question marks on all of them.  But hopefully out of the bunch you'll get one who works out.
17.   RHSP Ben Wells      If healthy, move him up a bunch.   
15.   SS/3B/LF Junior Lake    Not a fan.  Undisciplined/unreliable fielder and hitter, can't make contact. 


Aside from Maples, who I would leave off the list entirely, Craig's list looks good enough to copy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 14, 2013, 12:36:26 am
In order: Baez, Soler, Almora, Vizcaino, Vogelbach, Johnson, Jackson, Candelario, Paniagua, Szczur, Lake, Villanueva, Maples.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 14, 2013, 06:57:52 am
Baez,Soler,Almora,Vizcaino,Johnson,Vogelbach,Paniagua,Jackson,Szczur,Candelario,Underwood,Fujikawa,Maples.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 14, 2013, 07:47:15 am
I was going to whittle the list down to 12 or so and go from there; however, it looks like everyone has ordered their choices so I'll probably just add these up (after waiting for DaveP and others to provide ordered choices) and see where we stand.

We may need a final vote to break ties. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 14, 2013, 08:15:25 am
1.  Soler
2.  Vizcaino
3.  Almora
4.  Baez
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 14, 2013, 10:34:03 am
1. Baez

2. Soler

3. Almora

4. Vizcaino

5. Paniagua

6. Vogelbach

7. B. Jackson

8. Johnson

9. Underwood

10 Rondon (I know he isn't on the list.

11 Candelario

12 Amaya

13 Villanueva

14 Maples

15 Fujikawa
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 14, 2013, 11:18:47 am

10 Rondon (I know he isn't on the list.


Hey, if we are going to include folks not on the list, I would put Torreyes and then Lendy Castillo (in that order) right above Watkins, and bump everyone else down accordingly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 14, 2013, 01:17:29 pm
Too late.  You can't take back a post after 30 minutes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 14, 2013, 07:39:27 pm
Interesting Muskat article about Dillon Maples: http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130114&content_id=40953456&vkey=news_chc&c_id=chc&tcid=tw_article_40953456
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 15, 2013, 08:25:10 am
Quote
Jim Callis ‏@jimcallisBA

Could be. Huge power, good bat, nothing else. @wsdscofield: What do you think of Vogelbach? Potential 2014 Top 100 Prospect? #Cubs
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 15, 2013, 09:35:29 am
Quote
Jim Callis ‏@jimcallisBA

Could be. Huge power, good bat, nothing else. @wsdscofield: What do you think of Vogelbach? Potential 2014 Top 100 Prospect? #Cubs

Huge power, good bat.

That describes a rather high percentage of HOFers and MVP's.

Lou Gehrig, Willie McCovey, Orlando Cepeda, Jimmie Fox, Ted Williams none of those guys won games with their ams, their speed or their gloves.  Perhaps I am reading the Callis comment wrong, but it appears what he wrote reflects what he considers as the ceiling for Vogelbach's performance this season, that being viewed as a Top 100 prospect is the best anyone might imagine for Vogelbach after 2013.

Once more, it appears that Callis is underestimating Vogelbach, and the only reason for doing so would appear to be Vogelbach's weight.  It would not be where he was drafted, his signing bonus, the opinion of the Cub scouts or coaches who have worked with and evaluated Vogelbach, anything about Vogelbach's makeup, his age or his performance in 2012.

It would appear to be because Callis views Vogelbach as a fatboy.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on January 15, 2013, 12:29:25 pm
I would love to see Vogelbach prove Callis, Law and Arguello wrong, and become a mashing, adequate fielding left-fielder.  I'd also like to see him officially change his name to Babe Vogelbach after he wins rookie of the year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 15, 2013, 12:33:19 pm
I think that we are reading too much into Callis's comments.  As I read it, he is saying that he has great power and a great bat, but has no other outstanding tools.  That seems to be pretty accurate at this point.

It is Keith Law that keeps saying specifically that Vogelbach can play neither first base nor left field, which is a much stronger statement.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 15, 2013, 12:40:50 pm
You guys are *still* dreaming about this Vogelbach in LF thing?  Callis is more diplomatic than Law, so he's never going to make as strong a statement.  But here's Callis being more dismissive and clearly indicating he doesn't think it's a possiblity (I quoted this before; JR asked this question in a chat):

Quote
Justin (Nashville): There have been some reports that Dan Vogelbach moves a lot better for a big guy than some scouts first believed. With Rizzo hopefully being the long term solution at 1B for the Cubs, how laughable/ridiculous is the notion that Vogelbach could play LF?

Jim Callis: I'll put it this way: I've never talked to a scout who thought Vogelbach had a chance to play left field. There's a better chance that he's a DH only than he's a left fielder. That said, kudos to him on a great year with the bat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 15, 2013, 12:45:00 pm
jes, I think you're reading the comment wrong.  Callis said he could be a top-100 guy, and that is high praise/high status.  Nobody gets into top-100 prospect status without being viewed as having very serious big-league potential.  if you don't have a chance to become a really, really productive big-leaguer, you don't get into the discussion for top-100.  So saying that he could be top-100 seems like praise, not disrespect, to me. 

Of the 5 traditional tools, Vogel has huge power and a good bat.  Arm, speed, defense, none of those are plusses.  So I don't see any inaccuracy or disrespect there.  Do you think he's fast, or has an uncommonly good arm? 

To get included among BA's top-100 elite prospects is rare with only two asset tools, but Vogel's huge power and good bat make it well possible.   Seems fair to me.  Sure hope he has such a good season this year that it's an easy yes next year. 



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 15, 2013, 01:11:11 pm
You guys are *still* dreaming about this Vogelbach in LF thing? 

I agree, Vogelbach in LF is a pipe dream.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on January 15, 2013, 01:23:25 pm
Yeah, we should just be talking about whether Darwin Barney can be an effective regular on a good team.  What are you guys thinking?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on January 15, 2013, 01:48:43 pm
i think it depends on Vogelbach's weight more than anything...if he can continue to improve his body(something that he began working on in high school), I don't see why he can't man left field....if he's 250 lbs, not so much.  Not saying I expect him to be great there, but I'd settle for below average to passable defense there if he's hitting .300 with 40 bombs a year.

I was thinking I remembered seeing a couple of folks saying he had deceptive speed for a guy his size in an article or 2, so was curious about double plays/sb's and what not...in 270 ab's, he has grounded into 3 dp's so far.  Considering he probably makes hard contact most of the time, I expected that number to be higher.  He also was 2 for 3 in sb's.   I'm curious if those were straight steals, or missed hit and run's, or what the deal was with them.  He had 3 triples this year as well.

I predict there will be steak dinner bets at delicious White Castle laid down on this situation at some point in the future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 15, 2013, 02:05:55 pm
Those that say that Vogelbach couldn't play left field never say Hal Jeffcoat play center field between Hank Sauer and Ralph Kiner.

Or for that matter, have blocked out all memory of Soriano before last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on January 15, 2013, 02:10:01 pm
Who?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 15, 2013, 02:25:37 pm
Wonder how a young man like Vogelbach could presumably play baseball his whole life and not learn how to field a position? I also wonder how he could be as talented with the bat as he is but not put forth any effort to drop weight in order to be a more legitimate prospect? Sounds to me like character issues truthfully or just plain laziness.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on January 15, 2013, 02:59:02 pm
Vogelbach has dropped a ton of weight, beginning in high school.  And, from all accounts, he seems to be a hard worker.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 15, 2013, 03:18:25 pm
Yogi Berra, Frank Howard, Dave Kingman, lordy the list goes on of the zoo animals that have played left because they could hit. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on January 15, 2013, 03:30:27 pm
Warning: extreme cherry picking and obviousness ahead:

Regarding Callis, Law et al and their reports on Vogelbach's defense... Maybe they are wrong. Probably they are right. But maybe they are wrong.

Here is what Law wrote about Dustin Pedroia in 2007, when Pedroia was already in the majors (and conceivably lots of people had seen lots of his at bats and formed opinions): "Dustin Pedrois doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop."

That was taken from Nate Silver (of course!) and his great book "Signal & Noise" etc. Silver had PECOTA back then, and had ranked Pedroia as the 4th best prospect in baseball. Silver does go on to point out that over time Baseball America was better than PECOTA in predicting success.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 15, 2013, 04:54:01 pm
Wonder how a young man like Vogelbach could presumably play baseball his whole life and not learn how to field a position? I also wonder how he could be as talented with the bat as he is but not put forth any effort to drop weight in order to be a more legitimate prospect? Sounds to me like character issues truthfully or just plain laziness.

It was reported that he lost about 30 pounds in his senior year.  And I believe he has lost more since he became a professional.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 15, 2013, 05:02:51 pm
jes, I think you're reading the comment wrong.

It wouldn't be a first.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 15, 2013, 05:12:28 pm
Wonder how a young man like Vogelbach could presumably play baseball his whole life and not learn how to field a position? I also wonder how he could be as talented with the bat as he is but not put forth any effort to drop weight in order to be a more legitimate prospect? Sounds to me like character issues truthfully or just plain laziness.

When Vogelbach was either 16 or 17 he began aggressively losing weight... at a time when he was already living the live of a star athlete in HS despite his weight.  And he has continued to lose weight and meet targets set by the Cubs.  I would say that demonstrates dedication, character and intelligence.  At least one of which the post above would seem to show was lacking in someone.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 15, 2013, 05:26:45 pm
Warning: extreme cherry picking and obviousness ahead:

Here is what Law wrote about Dustin Pedroia in 2007, when Pedroia was already in the majors (and conceivably lots of people had seen lots of his at bats and formed opinions): "Dustin Pedrois doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major league pitching consistently, and he has no power. If he can continue to hit .260 or so, he'll be useful, and he probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop."

That was taken from Nate Silver (of course!) and his great book "Signal & Noise" etc. Silver had PECOTA back then, and had ranked Pedroia as the 4th best prospect in baseball. Silver does go on to point out that over time Baseball America was better than PECOTA in predicting success.

You'd think a time or two of getting something this wrong would temper the tendency to speak with such confidence (arrogance?) about prospects. 

But I guess you'd be wrong.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 15, 2013, 05:52:25 pm
You'd think a time or two of getting something this wrong would temper the tendency to speak with such confidence (arrogance?) about prospects. 

But I guess you'd be wrong.

Are you talking about Law and Callis or all the posters here...except you and me, of course.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 15, 2013, 06:20:42 pm
That was taken from Nate Silver (of course!) and his great book "Signal & Noise" etc. Silver had PECOTA back then, and had ranked Pedroia as the 4th best prospect in baseball. Silver does go on to point out that over time Baseball America was better than PECOTA in predicting success.

Here's the difference between Pedroia and Vogelbach, though...there was some disagreement on Pedroia.  In the quote above, you have Silver calling Pedroia the 4th best prospect in baseball.  Baseball America had Pedroia at #6 in the Red Sox system at the time.  He wasn't in their top 100 that year, but he'd been #77 the year before and had a pretty good season in 2006--I would guess he just missed.  Law's evaluation sounds like a borderline non-prospect.  Goldstein ranked him as the Red Sox 7th best prospect, and had some pretty good things to say: "Undersized max-effort player has outstanding contact skills, an advanced approach and surprising gap power for his size. Fundamentals in the field and on the base paths are nearly flawless....A solid big league middle infielder, nothing more."  Evaluations varied from elite prospect (Silver) to virtual non-prospect (Law).

But with Vogelbach, every evaluation I've seen (except for a couple by Cubs fans) say first base is the only defensive position he even has a chance to play.  Law comes right out and says you're delusional if you think he can play LF.  Callis says he hasn't found a scout yet who thinks he can play LF.  Goldstein had him as a bat-only player in his top 11 list last year.  And these aren't fly-by-night prospect guys who don't really know what they're talking about--Callis/Baseball America is the most respected source for prospect information.  Law was offered a job to run the Astros' minor league system a few months ago.  Goldstein actually accepted that job.  There is little to no doubt among guys that evaluate prospects at the very highest level that he's first base only at best

Is there a chance they're all wrong?  Sure.  But it's such a slim possibility that it still falls into the "fantasy" category.  I mean, there is a much, much bigger chance that the NL decides to adopt the DH in the next 3 years or so and he plays for the major league team in that role.  And even that is almost certainly not going to happen.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 15, 2013, 06:33:32 pm
But with Vogelbach, every evaluation I've seen (except for a couple by Cubs fans) say first base is the only defensive position he even has a chance to play.

And not one of those evaluations come from people who have ever seen him work out in LF or from people who have seen him at all regularly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 15, 2013, 07:04:16 pm
Alternate Reality
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 15, 2013, 07:15:29 pm
Are you talking about Law and Callis or all the posters here...except you and me, of course.

That Curt has an amazing ego.

Ron was not referring to you.  He was referring to me.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on January 15, 2013, 08:56:52 pm
Perhaps Vogelbach just doesn't have the athletic ability to play LF, but the requirements are minimal enough that I have a hard time accepting that it's a fantasy to think that he can learn to be adequate there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 16, 2013, 12:56:22 am
About three years ago, I was able to reduce my weight from 243 to 188 within a year by dieting and exercising. I don't think it's impossible that Vogelbach could get his weight down to 210 or 220 by the time he reaches the big leagues.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 16, 2013, 07:13:19 am
I went from 255 to 195 in a little over a year by doing nothing but not eating as much junk food. I was always pretty active so I didnt have to do anything different in that regards.

It wasnt very hard either.

That's why I wonder about Vogelbach.

If he wanted to do it one would think he could.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 16, 2013, 10:26:10 am
How much does Vogelbach weigh right now?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 16, 2013, 10:40:08 am
How much does Vogelbach weigh right now?

The reports I've seen were that he'd gotten up to 290 in high school, then got down to 250. His official weight has stayed at 250 since then. Which is the long way of saying I don't know.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 16, 2013, 10:45:28 am
From a November, 2012 Carrie Muskat column:

Quote
"I played point guard my whole life in basketball," Vogelbach said. "I've grown up playing a lot of different sports. I'm a lot more athletic than people think."

That's one of the reasons the Cubs picked him so high in the Draft.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on January 16, 2013, 11:07:18 am
By the time Vogelbach reaches the majors, the NL will have the DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on January 16, 2013, 11:17:37 am
290lb point guard?  :)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 16, 2013, 11:34:06 am
Someone pointed out that Vogelbach had 3 triples last year.  Out of curiosity, I checked to see what Prince Fielder (someone Vogelbach is often compared to) did in the minors.  He had 3 triples in four seasons and 1635 AB.

I remember being surprised that Fielder was as agile at 1B and (relatively speaking) ran as well as he did.  He's a good athlete even if he is way overweight.  Fielder is listed at 5'll", 255#.  Vogelach is listed at 6', 250# (although I seem to recall reading somewhere that he's lost some of that weight). So if he does lose some more of that weight, he will be in a better position than Fielder, as far as weight and body bulk is concerned.

From everything I've read about his dedication, his athleticism and how much of a student of the game he is, I don't think his weight/build will keep him from being a very productive major league player.  Just Fielder has overcome those limitations pretty darned well.

On the one hand, I kind of hope Vogelbach doesn't has to play LF for the Cubs, because even if he can do it, I'm sure he won't be a plus defender there. And I'd prefer the Cubs have plus defenders at every OF position.  That said, if Vogelach turns out to be as good a hitter as it appears he could be, either the Cubs will find a place for him to play (even if it's giving up some defense for his offense) or they'll have a terrific trading chip (Vogelbach or Rizzo) with which to improve the team. 

I used to be adamant in my opposition to the DH in the NL, but am much less so after all these years, and suspect that clark is right that it's coming to the NL.  If that happens all this talk about whether he can play LF or 1B will be irrelevant.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 16, 2013, 11:41:08 am
I've warmed up to the idea of the DH in the NL too.  It's kind of fun to have the pitcher batting when someone like Zambrano is on your team and it gives you a legitimate competitive advantage every fifth day.  We had a stretch there in the last decade or so where a lot of the Cubs' pitchers were better than your average pitcher with the bat (Wood, Prior, Maddux, even Wells).

But with Zambrano gone and the team loaded with guys like Garza and Dempster the last couple of years who are just awful with the bat, it really gets frustrating to have that spot come up every couple of innings. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 16, 2013, 11:55:00 am
I guess you could say there would be a substantial difference between having Garza or a mature Vogelbach at bat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on January 16, 2013, 12:17:29 pm
A thread from last October that includes a discussion of Vogelbach:

http://www.forums.mlb.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?nav=messages&webtag=ml-cubs&tid=416778
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 16, 2013, 12:36:32 pm
About three years ago, I was able to reduce my weight from 243 to 188 within a year by dieting and exercising. I don't think it's impossible that Vogelbach could get his weight down to 210 or 220 by the time he reaches the big leagues.

I believe the Cubs have a target weight for Vogelbach of just under 230 by the time he reaches the majors, and he should have no problem accomplishing that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 16, 2013, 12:53:15 pm
Quote
I'd say we cross that bridge when we get there. Rizzo could be out of baseball by then for all we know. 

- Post #2 from the PlayTwo's thread

That's another reason why I think this talk about Vogelbach in LF isn't really worth discussing that much.  There's probably what?  A 2% chance this even becomes an issue?  Probably not even that much?

First off, Vogelbach hasn't even made it out of Boise yet.  There's more than a trivial amount of difference between the quality of Northwest League pitching vs. the quality of Major League pitching.  Given some of the recent histories of guys who have put up big numbers in the NWL and what they did the following season, it's not even a given that Vogelbach will adjust to Kane County pitching right away.

Also, Rizzo has to become a franchise cornerstone player where we wouldn't want to trade him to make room for Vogelbach, if in fact Vogelbach does become a blue chip, can't miss hitting prospect.  Hopefully Rizzo does become that type of franchise player, but he might just turn into a guy you don't mind trading once he starts becoming expensive (e.g. Adam LaRoche) and once you have a big time power hitter come up through the system.

Not to mention that Vogelbach needs to at least show some minimal level of competency in LF if we want to try that experiment.  Again, Todd Hundley and Yonder Alonso have shown that even playing at a Manny Ramirez level of competency in LF isn't always a given. 

Plus we might even decide that we want to trade Vogelbach down the road for another franchise type player (like the Reds did trading for Mat Latos when they had excess prospects at 1B and C). 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 16, 2013, 12:57:22 pm
Pretty much, there's a whole lot of stuff that needs to happen before trying Vogelbach in LF gets past the message board speculation stage.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 16, 2013, 01:17:08 pm
I already have Vogelbach penciled into my 2016 Cubs lineup as the DH. My over/under on when the DH arrives in the NL after year-round interleague play begins is two years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 16, 2013, 01:21:33 pm
I agree that discussion about where Vogelbach plays in 4 years is not very productive or useful.

On the other hand, if we limit discussion to what is productive or useful, we would have to close the message board.

As far as the discussion is concerned, I think that the statement "if Vogelbach hits well enough, the Cubs can find a place to play him" is a lot more rational than the statement "No matter how well Vogelbach hits, the Cubs will not be able to play him at ANY position".

I suspect that if Hundly or Alonzo hit well enough, any team with a strong need for a left fielder would have put either of them out there, just as the Red Sox put Ramirez there, the Dodgers put Frank Howard there, and the Cubs put Soriano there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 16, 2013, 02:02:18 pm
I already have Vogelbach penciled into my 2016 Cubs lineup as the DH. My over/under on when the DH arrives in the NL after year-round interleague play begins is two years.

I'd love to have the DH.  Lets's get the NL into the late 20th century.  I don't enjoy boring AB's with pitchers wasting AB's, or 2-out innings.  But, I'm out of the loop.  Is there reason to be actually talking seriously about adding the DH?  The CBA runs through 2016.  Is there some actual possibility of instituting a massive rules change in the middle of a CBA?  I'm all for it, but it seems too good to be true. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 16, 2013, 02:18:52 pm
I suspect the MLBPA would be all over adding the DH in the NL with kisses and hugs, so I doubt that getting their approval would be a problem. It's up to the NL franchise owners. I'd expect a few of the small-market clubs would oppose it due to the added payroll cost, but it seems destined to happen sooner or later.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 16, 2013, 02:31:06 pm
There's more than a trivial amount of difference between the quality of Northwest League pitching vs. the quality of Major League pitching.  Given some of the recent histories of guys who have put up big numbers in the NWL and what they did the following season, it's not even a given that Vogelbach will adjust to Kane County pitching right away.

When is the last time a 19 year old did as well in the NWL as Vogelbach did, a comfortable 2nd in OPS?  And then when is the last time that 19 year old proved an utter failure?

Jackson was 20 at Boise, and finished 18th in OPS; Vitters was 18 and finished 13th;

I believe the only other players finishing in the top five in OPS in the last ten years are Greg Halman with Seattle who made it to the majors at 22 after finishing 4th at 19 in 2007, and Javier Herrera who was 5th in 2004 and is still struggling in the minors.

We really need to accept the fact that what Vogelbach did in 2012 really was special.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 16, 2013, 02:50:24 pm
I am as high on Vogelbach as anyone.  But the real test of a hitter is the breaking pitches he doesn't see in any quantity or quality until high A at least.

Vogelbach may well stall there, as might Baez of anyone else.  Once they are hitting well at AA, I finally relax a little.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 16, 2013, 03:15:32 pm
I once heard Oneri Fleita say if you can play in AA you can play in the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 16, 2013, 03:44:42 pm
I once heard Oneri Fleita say if you can play in AA you can play in the majors.

That pretty much explains why Oneri Fleita isn't running anyone's farm system anymore.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 16, 2013, 03:47:35 pm
Actually, if you can play in Little League, you can play in the majors.

Not very well, perhaps, but Fleita never said HOW WELL you could play.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 16, 2013, 05:38:06 pm
There is some truth in Fleita's statement.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 16, 2013, 05:41:00 pm
I suspect the MLBPA would be all over adding the DH in the NL with kisses and hugs, so I doubt that getting their approval would be a problem. It's up to the NL franchise owners. I'd expect a few of the small-market clubs would oppose it due to the added payroll cost, but it seems destined to happen sooner or later.

Yeah, good point that union should like it.  Yes, it seems destined to happen sooner or later.  But that's been true for decades, and "later" keeps winning.   I was hoping maybe there was gossip that management was wanting this.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 16, 2013, 06:03:35 pm
There was some discussion of it last winter after Fielder and Pujols signed their long-term deals with AL clubs that no NL club could afford to match. I never saw any reports of how serious the discussions were, or how close it came to happening then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 16, 2013, 06:05:41 pm
I sure hope dallen wasn't carried off by a bear or struck by some other catastrophe. I'd like to see the final results of the consensus top prospect list.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 16, 2013, 06:45:57 pm
I hope and pray the DH never comes to the NL - it's an abomination.  But I fear it's probably inevitable.

The talk of Vogelbach in LF is a little silly.  Not because there's no chance he could play there, but because a stated, it's at least 3 years away and for all we know, Rizzo could have busted out by then.  I think there's a decent chance Vogelbach will develop into a better offensive player than Rizzo in any case, so who's to say what management might have on their hands?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 16, 2013, 06:51:22 pm
I'm not sure discussing Vogelbach is silly.  Becoming entrenched emotionally in a position about it may be.

I agree with Deeg.  Alonso was no problem in Cincy.  He became a starting pitcher via trade.  I'll take 3 more Vogelbachs if they become key rotation or other position players.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 16, 2013, 07:16:38 pm
That is silly.  If Vogelbach can't play left, he sure can't pitch.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on January 16, 2013, 07:17:14 pm
I agree with Deeg about the DH.  Batters in the starting lineup should play a position on the field.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 16, 2013, 07:20:09 pm
Final consensus top 150:

Baez and Soler ended up tied with 77 points in the final ranking.  I placed Baez first based on more 1st place votes.

1.   SS Javier Baez 6'1" 205 lbs R/R (199212) [2011-01, FL HS] BA Most exciting player in FSL (2012) [2013 Cubs BA01] 0.979 OPS in 222 MWL PA followed by 0.644 OPS in small (93 PA) FSL sample.  24/29 SB.  Electric bat speed and strong arm.

2.   RF Jorge Soler 6’3” 205 Lbs R/R (199202) [2012- Cuba, $30M] [2013 Cubs BA 03] After shaking rust off in AZL, hit 0.338/0.398/0.513 in 95 MWL PA. Explosive power and some speed.

3.   CF Albert Almora 6’1” 170 Lbs R/R (199404) [2012-01, FL HS; $3.25M] [2013 Cubs BA 02] 0.321/0.331/0.464 in 142 PA between AZL & NWL.  Quick bat. Best defensive player in 2012 draft (BA). Perhaps the most polished HS player in 2012 draft.

4.   RHSwing Arodys Vizcaino 6’0” 190 Lbs (199011) [2007-DR(Yankees), from Braves July 2012] [2013 Cubs BA 04] March 2012 TJ surgery. In 2011 100/28 K/W in 97 IP at 3 different minor league levels (0.225 BAA).   When healthy features mid 90s FB and plus plus curve.

5.   1B Dan Vogelbach 6'0" 240 Lb L/R (199212) [2011-02, FL HS] [2013 Cubs BA07; NWL #2, 2012; 2012 BA short-season all-star] Began in AZL due to poor spring training but was promoted to NWL mid-season and crushed pitching in both leagues. Combined 0.322/0.410/0.641 in 280 PA. Minus minus speed with minus glove.

6.   RHSP Pierce Johnson 6’3” 170 Lbs (199105) [2012-01s, Missouri State; $1.2M][2013 Cubs BA06]  in 2012, 12/3 K/W in 8 NWL IP (10 Hits) Lively low 90s FB, hard curve, and effective changeup.  Early spring forearm strain
likely caused him to slide to supplemental round.

7.   CF/RF Brett Jackson 6'2" 210 Lbs L/R (198808) [2009-01, U California] BA#38(2011) [2013 Cubs BA05] In 2012, 0.256/0.338/0.479 in 454 PCL PA. 0.644 OPS in 142 MLB PA.  Four above average tools (bat is average)

8.   RHP Juan Carlos Paniagua 6’1” 195 Lbs [199004, DR] [2013 Cubs BA 11] $1.5M bonus after international bonus cap. Mid 90’s FB, nasty slider with good command.  Played winterball in Panama.  In 2012, 4/1 K/W in 3 AZL IP.

9.   CF/RF/LF Matt Szczur 6'1" 195 Lb R/R (198907) [2010-05, Villanova]  [2011 Cubs BA07, 2012 Cubs BA03]. 0.801 OPS in FSL (442 PA) led to promotion to SL where he posted disappointing 0.641 OPS (157 PA). 38/50 SB in FSL 4/6 in SL.

10.   3B Jeimer Candelario 6'0" 185 Lb B/R (199311) [2010, DO via New York] [2013 Cubs BA 08; NWL#7, 2012] Spent 2011 in DSL.  Skipped AZL. In 2012, 0.281/0.345/0.396 in304 NWL PA. Projectable frame.

11.   RHSP Duane Underwood 6’2” 205 Lbs  (199407) [2012-02, GA HS; $770K] Underwood was 6-1 with a 2.36 ERA for Pope High School in Marietta, Ga., this past spring, striking out 75 and walking 34 in 50 1/3 innings. Mid 90’s FB and solid curve. 8.2 IP & 7/6 K/W for Mesa. 0.206 BAA.

12.   3B Christian Villaneuva 5’11” 160 lbs R/R (199106) [2009-MX, for Dempster] [2013 Cubs BA 12]. 0.279/0.353/0.427 in 493 high-A PA.  Small in stature but has speed (32 SB) and surprising power (17 HR). 

13.   3B Josh Vitters 6'2" 200 Lbs R/R (198908) [2007-01, Cal HS] [ 2012CubsBA09]  In 2012, 0.304/0.356/0.513 in 445 PCL PA. Woeful 0.395 OPS in 106 ML PA overshadowed solid AAA season. 

14.   RHSP Dillon Maples 6'3" 195 Lbs (199205) [2011-14] $2.5M bonus. (#46 draft prospect BA-2011) Plus FB and curve but below-average command.  “Minor” injury delayed his 2012 debut until late July [2012 Cubs BA05] In 2012, 12/10 K/W in 10.1 AZL IP (0.162 BAA).

15.   SS/3B Arismendy Alcantara 5'10" 160 Lbs S/R (199110) (2008-DO) [2013 Cubs BA 10] 0.302/0.339/0.447 in 350 FSL PA. 25/29 in SB. BA Best (if erratic) IF arm in FSL (2012).  Injury limited sample size but 2012 was a breakout season.

16.   SS/3B/LF Junior Lake 6'3" 215 Lb R/R (199003) [2007-DO] 109/19 K/W. 0.315/0.336/0.498 in 203 FSL AB.  0.248/0.300/0.380 in 242 SL AB.  [2011 Cubs BA27, 2012 Cubs BA08] Best IF arm in system (BA2012). Flashes of brilliance but lacks consistency

17.   RHRP Kyuji Fujikawa 6’0” 190 Lbs (198007) [2012-JP] [2013 Cubs BA 09] In 2012, posted 58/15 K/W in 47 IP as closer in Japan. 91-93 mph FB with plus plus splitter.

18.   2B Gioskar Amaya: 5'11" 175 lb R/R MI (199212) [2009-VZ] [NWL #9 2012; 2012 Short-season All Star BA; 2013 Cubs BA 21] In 2012, 0.298/0.381/0.496 in 335 NWL PA.

19.   RHRP Alberto Cabrera 6'4" 210 Lb (198810) [DO]. [2013 Cubs BA 13] In 2012, became full time reliever.  45/10 K/W in 35.2 SL IP (0.217 BAA). 29/4 K/W in 19.1 PCL IP but allowed 29 hits. 18/11 K/W in 13.1 ML IP (0.224 BAA).

20.   RHSP Ben Wells 6'3" 220 Lbs (199209) [2010-07, Ark HS] [2012 Cubs BA 25] NWL#12
Solid sinker (92-94 MPH FB with knee-buckling slider and developing split-finger). 36/12 K/W in 44.0 MWL IP (0.274 BAA). Elbow concerns (missed 2 months in 2012) cloud his 2013 status.

21.   RHSwing Hector Rondon 6’3” 180 Lbs (198802) [2004-VZ, Rule5(2012)] In 2009, 73/16 K/W in 72 EL IP followed by 64/13 K/W in 74 IL IP. Elbow woes led to TJ surgery in 2010 and fracture in 2011.  Missed most of 2010 and nearly all of 2011/2012. Mid 90s FB when healthy.

22.   2B/SS Ronald Torreyes 5’9’ 140 Lbs R/R (199209) [2010, VZ][2012 Reds BA13] In 2012,0.264/0.326/0.385 in 453 FSL PA. 29/32 K/W.  Overcame slow start to have solid season.  Precocious but stature limits upside.

23.   SS/CF Logan Watkins 5'11" 170 LB (198908) [2008-21, KS HS] [2013 Cubs BA19;2012 AA Allstar BA] OPS of 0.689/0.756/0.805 in MWL/FSL/SL during 2010/11/12.  28/35 in SB and 76 BB in SL.

24.   RHRP Tony Zych 6'3" 188 Lbs (199008) [2011-04, Louisville] [2012 Cubs BA 15] Works at 94-97.  In 2012, 36/7 K/W in 36.2 FSL IP (0.239 BAA). 28/12 K/W in 24.2 SL IP (0.268 BAA).

25.   RHRP Rafael Dolis 6'4" 215 Lb (198801) [2004-DO] 2011 SL allstar.  Hardest thrower in system. [2012 Cubs BA07] In 2012, 15/20 K/W in 30.1 ML IP (0.272 BAA). 14/6 K/W in 14 PCL IP (0.278 BAA).

26.   RHSP Paul Blackburn 6’2” 185 lbs (199312) [2012-01s, CA HS;$912K]. In 2012, threw hard but lacked knockout pitch. 13/7 K/W in 20.2 AZL IP (0.284 BAA).  Plus curve.  Has pitchability.  Polished for HS pick.

27.   RHSwing Trey McNutt 6'4" 220 lb (198908)[2009-32, Shelton St. CC] [2012 Cubs BA04]. In 2012, repeated AA. 66/45 K/W in 95 IP (0.251 BAA).  Much lower BAA than 2011.  Solid FB.  Best curveball in system (BA2012)   

28.   SS Marco Hernandez S/R 6'0" 170 Lbs (199209) [2009-DO] [NWL #6, 2012, 2012 Cubs BA 16; 2012 BA AZL#6]. Solid fielder with average-SS arm but can he hit enough? In 2012, 0.548 (0.726) OPS in 169 (279) MWL (NWL) PA. Concerning 76/19 K/W.

29.   RHSP Robert Whitenack 6'5" 185 Lbs (198811) [2009-08, SUNY Old Westbury] [2012 Cubs BA 19] In 2012, struggling to recover from TJS. 31/27 K/W in 51.1 FSL IP (0.332 BAA). In 2011, before blowing out arm, dominated in FSL and pitched very well in AA 22/13 K/W in 37 AA IP.

30.   CF/RF/LF Jae-Hoon Ha 6'1" 185 Lbs R/R (199010) [2008-KO] [2012 Cubs BA 18; best def OF in system (BA2012)]   0.279/0.315/0.413 in 556 PA split between FSL(312)&SL(244). 67/23 K/W. Power suffered a bit after promotion. 13 SB in 30 attempts. [2011 Cubs BA28] 

31.   2B Zeke DeVoss 5'10" 175 Lb S/R (199007) [2011-03, U of Miami] [2012 Cubs BA 14] in 2011, NWL#17.  In 2012, in MWL, 0.249/0.382/0.370 35/51 in SB attempts. 82 walks but mediocre BA and 118 K’s.

32.   RHSP Barret Loux 6’5” 215 Lbs (198904) [2010-FA, Texas A&M] 6th overall pick in 2012 draft but failed physical due to shoulder injury.  Acquired by Cubs for Sota  (Replaced injured-Brigham)  In 2012, Texas League pitcher of the year with 100/41 K/W in 127 AA IP (0.251 BAA). Low 90s FB and average secondary pitches.  BA scouts underwhelmed say his ceiling is 5th starter.

33.   C/RF/1B Willson Contreras 6'1" 175 Lbs (199205) [VE-2009] $850K bonus. In 2012, repeated NWL with slightly better numbers than 2011. 0.273/0.316/.357 in 260 NWL PA.  Threw out 47% of basestealers (23 of 49).

34.   RHSP Ryan McNeil 6’3” 210 Lbs (199402) [2012-03, CA HS; $472K] 18/10 K/W in 20 AZL IP (0.264 BAA).  Multi-sport athlete with low 90s FB, slider, and changeup and sturdy frame. #185 BA top 500:

35.   RHSP Tayler Scott 6'3" 165 Lbs (199206) [2011-05, AZ HS via S Africa] (89-93 MPH FB and slow curve).   In 2012, Disappointing 43/29 K/W in 71 NWL IP (0.245 BAA). [NWL, #17, 2012]

36.   RHSP Jose Arias 6'5" 220 Lbs (199101) [DO] Mid 90s FB but secondary pitches need work. After spending 2011 in DSL posted 46/19 K/W in 63 NWL IP (0.258 BAA) in 2012.

37.   RHSwing Lendy Castillo 6’1” 170 Lbs (198904) [2007-DR] Rule 5 pick who pitched more 2012 innings in minors rehabbing groin injury than in majors.  In 2011 46/16 K/W in 46 IP (0.220 BAA) high A IP. Got shelled in limited 2012 ML IP (12/9 K/W in 12 IP, 0.390 BAA).

38.   RHSP Josh Conway 6’1” 175 Lbs (19910) [2012-04, Coastal Carolina; $343K] #208 BA Top 500: Featured mid-90’s FB before needing TJ surgery this spring. For Coastal Carolina, has 50/18 K/W in 55 IP.

39.   LHSP Austin Kirk 6'1" 200 Lbs (199005) [2009-03, OK HS]  In 2012, 78/48 K/W in 129 FSL IP (120 HAA) followed by 13/12 K/W in 23 SL IP (18 HAA).  FSL 2012-mid-season allstar

40.   C Justin Marra 5'11" 180 Lbs L/R (199301) [2011-15, Toronto HS].  Good receiver with solid arm.    0.322/0.457/0.467 line in 111 AZL PA. Impressive line but injury kept sample size small.

41.   LHSP Carlos Rodriguez 5’11” 178 Lbs (199507) [VZ-2011; $120K bonus] 73/20 K/W in 71 DSL IP (0.197 BAA)

42.   SS/2B Carlos Penalver 6'0" 170 Lbs R/R (199405) [2010-VZ, $550K]  In 2012, 0.273/0.341/0.322 in 202 AZL PA.  31/19 K/W and 7/11 in SB. 

43.   RHSP Kyle Hendricks 6’3” 190 Lbs (198912) [2011-08, Dartmouth] Carolina mid-season all star (2012). In 2012, 123/18 K/W in 147.2 CAR/FSL IP (0.253 BAA).  Great control, 5 pitches, but only occasionally touches 90 mph. Best changeup/command in Carolina league.

44.   LHSP Brooks Raley 6'3" 185 Lbs (198806) [2009-06, TexasA&M]  [2011 Cubs BA26]    In 2012, 98/40 K/W in 130.2 combined SL/PCL IP (134 H; 9HR). 16/11 K/W in 24.1 MLB IP (0.317 BAA; 7 HR).  Features above average curveball but no true “out” pitch.

45.   RHSP Michael Jensen 6'1" 185 Lbs (199012) [2011-26, Hartnell(CA) JC] In 2012, 115/40 K/W in 140 MWL IP.  0.237 BAA vs righties & 0.189 BAA vs lefties.

46.   RHSP Jose Rosario 6'1" 170 Lbs (199008) [2008-FA] [2012 Cubs BA 22] 92-94 MPH FB.  In 2012, 95/34 K/W in 111 MWL IP (0.254 BAA vs righties but 0.316 vs lefties).

47.   RHSP Matt Loosen 6'2" 205 lbs (198904) [2010-23, Jacksonville College]  In 2012, 110/46 K/W in 112 FSL IP (0.202 BAA led FSL starters).  Named to 2012 post-season FSL all star team.

48.   3B/2B/SS Stephen Bruno 5’9” 165 Lbs (199011) [2012-07, UVA; $149K] #13 in VA.  0.361/0.442/0.496 in 270 NWL PA after leading UVA in hitting with.362/.418/.549 line.  Versatile IF who led NWL in OBP  [NWL #15, 2012]. 

49.   RHSP Nick Struck 5'11" 185 Lbs (198910) [2009-39, Mount Hood (Ore) CC] in 2012, 123/44 K/W in 155.2 SL IP (0.238 BAA, 14 HRA) [2012 Cubs pitcher of the year, BA].  Struggled with control in AFL (fall 2012).  Durable but has not won over scouts yet.

50.   LHSP Eric Jokisch 6'2" 185 Lbs (198907) (2011-11, Northwestern) Cubs best MiL pitcher in 2011 (B America) In 2012, 63/33 K/W in 105 SL IP (0.226 BAA) after 52/16 K/W in 54 FSL IP (0.267 BAA). K/IP suffered upon promotion to SL.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 16, 2013, 07:24:59 pm
51.   RHSP Marcelo Carreno 6’1” 170 Lbs (199106) (2007-VZ, for JBaker)  In 2012, repeated low-A and posted 119/28 K/W in 139 IP (129 HAA).  Low 90s FB.  Projects to have avg FB, curve, & change-up

52.   SS/3B Tim Saunders 6’0’ 180 Lbs R/R (19905) [2012-32, Marietta College] In 2012, Dominated D-III, leading division in total bases, runs and hits.  Ceiling is fleet footed ML UT. Early returns suggest he could reach ceiling: 1.222 OPS in 76 AZL PA, 0.743 OPS in 46 FSL PA, & 0.862 OPS in 89 MWL PA.  5th best debut of college players (BA)

53.   RHSP Daury Torrez 6’3” 170 Lbs (199306) [2010-DR] In 2012, 50/4 K/W in 74 DSL IP (0.213 BAA).

54.   LHSP Frank Del Valle 5'11" 190 Lbs (198909) [Cuba, 2011; $800K] In 2012, 84/30 K/W in 99.1 FSL IP (0.197 BAA vs LHH; 0.193 BAA vs. RHH).  Az Phil: Low 90's FB with plus movement and outstanding breaking ball.

55.   RHSwing Trey Lang 6’3” 230 Lbs (199205) [2012-06, AZ  CC; $193K] Big framed kid who began 2012 as college OF, became closer/OF and was drafted by Cubs to be pitcher. Featured low 90s FB when began closing but slipped into U80s by end of season.   11/2 K/W in 13 AZL IP (16 HAA).

56.   CF/LF Pin-Chieh Chen 6'1" 170 lb L/R (199107) (2009-TW) NWL#14: Fleet footed line drive/contact hitter with limited upside and an above average arm. In 2012, 0.259/0.345/0.347 in 526 MWL PA. 36/50 in SB.

57.   RHRP Carlos Martinez-Pumarino 6’4” 230 Lbs (199104) [2011-CU; $250K bonus] 44/14 K/W in 43 AZL IP (0.225 BAA).  AZL post-season allstar.  In 2009-2010, pitched for Cuban national team but struggled with control (19/23 K/W in 23 IP). As of 2011, featured low 90s FB

58.   RHSwing Yao-Lin Wang 6'0" 180 lbs (199102) [2009-Taiwan] NWL#21-30.  In 2012, 82/27 K/W in 78 MWL IP (72 Hits 7 HR allowed).  FB/curve.

59.   LF/CF/RF John Andreoli 6'1" 215 Lbs R/R (199006) [2011-17, UCONN] Solid debut for powerless on-base machine with plus speed and good genes.  In 2012, 0.289 BA (0.402 OBP) in 487 FSL PA (54 SB).  2012 FSL postseason all-star.

60.   LHSP Kyler Burke  6'3" 205 Lbs (198804) [2006-01S as OF, Padres] Mid 90's FB.  Converted OF started for first time in 2012. Struggled after promotion to FSL. 52/22 K/W in 74 MWL IP (0.211 BAA). 39/22 K/W in 56.2 FSL IP (64 HAA).

61.   CF/lF Darien (Trey) Martin 6'2" 188 Lbs R/R (199212) [2011-13, GA HS] [NWL #16, 2012] In 2012, 0.270/0.318/0.377 in 217 NWL PA.  6/11 in SB.

62.   RHRP Jaye Chapman 6’0” 195 Lbs (198705) [2005-16, FL HS, Braves] 70/36 K/W in 63 AAA IP (57 hits allowed).  Excellent K/IP but shaky control.

63.   RHSP Dae-Eun Rhee 6'2" 190 Lbs (198903) [2007-KO] [2012 Cubs BA11]  Best changeup in system (BA2012) but few K’s in 2012. In 2012, 78/51 K/W in 142.1 SL IP (168 H;18 HR! 0.298 BAA).

64.   CF/LF Shawon Dunston Jr. 6'2" 175 Lbs  L/R (199302) [2011-11, HS] [2012 Cubs BA 30] In 2012, 0.577 OPS  in 69 NWL PA earned demotion to AZL where he did much better: 0.286/0.357/0.410 in 185 PA. Average speed and arm.

65.   RHSP Alexander Santana 6'2" 170 lb (199310) [2010-DR] In 2012, 51/14 K/W in 59 DSL IP (0.231 BAA). 87-91 mph FB with above-avg sink and a good curve ball for his age.

66.   RHRP Zach Putnam 6’1” 225 Lbs (198707) [2008-05, UMich; acquired on waivers Nov 2012] [2012 Indians BA10] 49/27 K/W in 60 PCL IP (0.298 BAA).

67.   CF/RF Jeffrey Baez 6'0" 180 Lbs R/R (199310) [VZ] In 2012, 0.291/0.378/0.448 in 190 in DSL PA. 28/37 SB. 35/18 K/W.  Earned Aug cup of coffee with AZL Cubs.  Athletic projectable body.  Fleet runner with average arm.

68.   LHSP Anthony Prieto 5’11” 170 Lbs (199311) [2012-05, TX HS; $257K] Touched mid 90s last summer but forearm strain limited his velocity to the upper 80s this spring.  Hard to hit when he found the strike zone this summer (0.145 BAA with 11/12 K/W in 19 AZL IP).

69.   LHSP Gerardo Concepcion 6’2” 180 Lbs (199202) [2012, CU, $6M 5-yr ML] Displayed solid 3 pitch mix as amateur in Cuba but struggled with velocity & command after signing with Cubs. In MWL, 70H in 52 IP (0.329 BAA) with 30/28 K/W.

70.   RHRP Carlos Gutierrez 6’3” 230 Lbs (198609) [2008-01, U Miami] [2012 Twins BA-17] Possessed “electric” heavy FB when drafted but arm issues (requiring surgery in summer 2012) and lack of command have slowed his progress. In 2012, 20/3 K/W in 16 AAA IP (0.217 BAA). 

71.   RHRP AJ Morris 6'2" 185 Lbs (198612) [2009-04 (Nats for Gorz), KSU] [2011 BA18(Nats)]. After missing 2011 with shoulder injury posted 42/15 K/W in 52 FSL IP (0.189 BAA!).  Ground ball pitcher.

72.   LHSP Chris Rusin 6'2" 185 Lbs (198610) [2009-04, UKentucky] HR-prone soft-thrower who posted solid 0.267 BAA in 140 PCL IP with 94/53 K. 9/6 KW in 11 MLB IP (0.318 BAA).

73.   RHSP Dallas Beeler 6'5" 205 lbs (198906) [2010-41, Oral Roberts] [2012 Cubs BA 12] Regressed in 2012 as K rate plummeted, 70/48 K/W in 136 SL IP (166 HAA, 0.305 BAA).

74.   RHSP Patrick Francescon 5'11" 185 Lbs (198901) [2011-40, Trevecca Nazarene] Became starter in 2012, Dominating 42/14 K/W & 0.155 BAA in 52 MWL IP followed by 53/24 K/W in 84 FSL IP (0.257 BAA).

75.   2B Frandy De La Rosa 6’1” 180 Lbs S/R (1995??) [2012, DR; $700K]  #19 International Prospect in 2012 (Baseball America). Switch hitting line drive hitter with simple short swing and quick hands.  Position TBD. Likely lacks range and arm to play SS

76.   RHRP Marcus Hatley 6'5" 220 Lb (198803) [2006-39, CA CC(d+f)] [2012 Cubs BA 26] In 2012, 46/20 K/W in 45 SL IP (36 HAA) followed by 18/10 K/W in 15 PCL IP (14 HAA but 8.22 ERA).

77.   LHSwing Jeffry Antigua 6'1" 170 lbs (199006) [2006-DO] In 2012, Excellent 40/13 K/W in 40.0 SL IP (0.270 BAA) followed by 38/11 K/W in 41.0 MWL IP (0.217 BAA).  Solid FB.

78.   LF/RF Reggie Golden 5'10" 210 lbs R/R(199110) [2010-02] [2012 Cubs BA 17] Tore ACL and missed most of 2012 (28 official AB) [2011 Cubs BA23, BP08]  Explosive power when/if he makes contact. Above average speed. 

79.   1B Justin Bour 6'4" 250 Lbs L/R (198805) [2009-25, GMU] In 2012, impressive 0.283/0.360/0.455 line (17 HR) in 568 SL PA. 0.842 OPS vs RHP. SL post-season allstar

80.   RHRP Dayan Diaz 5’10” 160 Lbs (198902) [2006-Columbia(Astros); miFA 2013] Two-seam mid 90s FB and curve.  Shelled in 2013 WBC qualifier. In 2012, 64/30 K/W in 58  high-A IP (0.197 BAA).  In 2011, MILB.com & BA short-season all star with 70/30 K/W in 50 IP (0.158 BAA).  Missed nearly all of 2009/2010 with injuries.

81.   LHRP Hunter Ackerman 6'1" 190 Lbs (199010) [2010-04, NC JC] 88-91 MPH FB that induces ground balls and advanced-change up. In 2012, 28/11 K/W in 22.1 NWL IP (27 HAA).

82.   3B Jesse Hodges 6’1” 212 Lbs R/R (1993??) [2012-FA, Canada HS] Signed after impressing Cubs in World Jr Tourney as member of Canadian Nat Team

83.   RHSwing Ty'Relle Harris 6'4" 235 Lb (198612) [2009-19, UTenn] In 2012, 67/39 K/W in 82 IP between FSL, SL, & PCL (0.242 BAA).

84.   SS Luis Enrique Acosta 6'1" 180 Lb R/R (199411) [2011-DO; $1.1M] 0.197/0.293/0.300 in 228 DSL PA. Top Cubs middle IF prospect in DSL. Projection exceeds performance. Should repeat DSL in 2013.

85.   LHRP Michael Heesch 6’5” 245 Lbs (199005) [2012-08, SC-Beaufort; $139K] 19/1 K/W in 23 NWL IP (0.258 BAA).  90ish FB and fringy slider/chaneup.  NWL “sleeper” (Conor Glassey, BA)

86.   3B/1B Dustin Geiger 6'2" 180 Lbs R/R (199112) [2010-24, Fl HS] In 2012, 0.251/0.301/0.465 in 382 MWL PA.  79/20 K/W.

87.   CF/2B/RF/LF Rubi Silva 5'11" 180 Lb L/R (198906) [2010, Cuba, $1Mill] In 2012, 0.302/0.322/0.412 in 433 FSL PA. 0.263/0.277/0.413 in82 SL PA. Spending fall 2012 in AFL.

88.   RHRP Frank Batista 5'10" 170 lb (198904) [2009-DO] In 2012, 39/21 K/W in 52 SL IP (0.199 BAA). Hit hard during 7 inning PCL stint. SL mid-season allstar.

89.   RHRP Kevin Rhoderick 6'1" 190 Lbs (198808) [2010-09, Oregon St] In 2012, Repeated AA but already shaky control worsened.  53/47 K/W in 57 IP (0.230).  Showed much better control in 9 AZL IP (14/2 K/W). Best slider in system (BA2012)

90.   LF Ricardo Marcano 6'2" 187 Lbs L/R (199410) [2011-VZ; $400K]. In 2012, 0.245/0.350/0.332 in 254 DSL PA. Projects to hit for average & power.  Average speed and hands.

91.   LHRP Zach Rosscup 6'2" 205 Lbs (198806) [2009-28 (TB), Oregon CC] In 2012, struggled with control but hard to hit 29/19 K/W in 22.1 SL IP (0.179 BAA).  Late season arm concerns kept him out of AFL.

92.   RHRP Brian Schlitter 6'5" 235 Lbs (198512) [2007-16(Phils) College of Charleston] After missing 2011 with elbow issues, in 2012, posted solid 63/13 K/W in 69 IP between the FSL and SL. 0.262 BAA.

93.   RHRP Blake Parker 6'3" 225 Lbs (198506) [2006-16, Arkansas] (BA-20) In 2012, 22/6 K/W in 23 PCL IP (0.190 BAA) but 6/5 K/W in 6 ML IP (0.370 BAA). Missed middle of season with stress reaction in right elbow

94.   RF/LF Oliver Zapata 5'9" 180 Lbs S/R (199209) [DO]  In 2012, Still young but powerless speedster did not reach base enough in full-season debut. 0.225/0.305/0.282 in 409 MWL PA. Only 19/32 in SB attempts.

95.   3B Mark Malave 6'3" 185 Lbs S/R (199501) [2011-VZ] $1.6M bonus.  In 2012 debut, 0.229/0.328/0.278 in 259 DSL PA.

96.   C Chadd Krist 5’11” 190 lbs R/R (199001) [2012-09, U California; $130K] Senior sign with good athleticism and strong arm. Suspect bat but hit 0.253/0.324/0.447 in 165 MWL PA after 62 NWL PA.  Best defensive C in Cubs system (BA2013)

97.   RHSwing Jay Jackson 6'1" 195 Lbs (198710) [2008-09, Furman] [2011 Cubs BA15, BP09] 76/43 K/W in 86 PCL IP (0.309 BAA).  Spent 3rd full season in AAA with each year a bit worse than the one before

98.   RF Johermyn Chavez 6’3” 225 Lbs R/R (198901) [2005-VE, signed as miFA Nov2012]  Posted 0.964 in 2010 in extreme hitters park (High Desert) but has struggled since. In 2012, 0.232/0.339/0.386 in 281 SL PA.

99.   CF/RF Taiwan Easterling 5'11" 195 Lbs R/R (198902) [2011-27] [2012 Cubs BA 28] First full season had disappointing results. 0.243/0.316/0.366 in 289 MWL PA. 18/28 in SB. 0.624 OPS vs. RHP.

100.   3B/1B/LF Greg Rohan 6'0" 205 Lbs R/R (198605) [2009-21,Kent St] In 2012, 0.282/0.349/0.491 in 536 PA in FSL, SL, and PCL. 2012 mid-season FSL allstar. Veteran utilityman with a bat.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 16, 2013, 07:27:04 pm
101.   SS/2B Elliot Soto 5'9" 160 Lbs R/R (198908) [2010-15, Creighton U] In 2012, 0.220/0.310/0.282 in 236 SL PA. Weak bat but solid glove.

102.   RHRP Chad Martin 6’7” 230 Lbs  (199005)  [2012-10, Indiana U; $125K] In 2012, 17/9 K/W in 16 AZL IP (17 HAA).  Low 90s FB when used for short stints.  Curveball and slider lack consistency. Questionable control.

103.   C Neftali Rosario R/R 5'11" 193 lbs (199307) [2011-06, Puerto Rico] In 2011, put up 0.842 OPS in 108 AZL PA.  In 2012, 0.584 OPS in 47 AZL PA.  Injured much of 2012. 

104.   LF/RF Bijan Rademacher 6’0” 200 Lbs L/L (199106) [2012-13, CA CC] Two way prospect who touches mid90s with FB.  In 2012, 0.977 OPS in 55 NWL PA followed by 0.575 OPS in 132 MWL PA.  0.271 OPS vs LHP in MWL.

105.   3B/1B Jacob Rogers 6’5” 195 Lbs L/R (198908) [2012-40, Mt. Olive college] Dominated as expected versus much younger pitchers in AZL (0.999 OPS) but followed with surprising 0.300/0.493/0.420 in 69 MWL PA. 14/19 K/W in MWL.  Has most pure power of 2012 Cub draftees.

106.   RF/LF/CF Garrett Schlecht 6'2" 198 Lb L/L (199302) [2011-09, Illinois HS; $235K (when signed was highest ever for 9th round)] In 2012, 0.252/0.359/0.345 in 139 AZL PA. 32-40 in SB.

107.   LF/1B Trevor Gretzky 6'4" 190 Lbs L/L (199209) [2011-07, CA HS] No power yet.  0.304 BA, 0.372 OBP, and 0.026 ISO in 127 AZL PA.

108.   RHRP Luis Liria 6'2" 170 Lbs (199001) [2007-DO] In 2012, 52/46 K/W in 59 MWL IP (0.242 BAA).

109.   RHRP Casey Weathers 6’1” 205 Lbs (198506) [2007-01(Rockies), Vanderbilt] [2012 Cubs BA 27] No control and poor K/IP since TJ surgery in late 2008. 29/53 K/W in 34 PCL IP (0.208 BAA).

110.   LHRP Brian Smith 6'0" 170 Lbs (199212) [2011-40, Ontario HS] After starting in 2011, spent 2012 in bullpen where he put up excellent numbers in limited AZL/NWL innings. Overall, 22/10 K/W in 23 IP (0.163 BAA).

111.   RHRP Oswaldo Martinez 6'0" 180 Lbs (198809) [2006-MEX] In 2012, 42/15 K/W in 56 Mexican league IP (0.350 BAA).  Still with Cubs?

112.   RHRP Eddie Orozco 6’2” 195 Lbs (198904) [2012-22, UC Riverside] 31/11 K/W in 27 NWL IP (19 HAA). Signed as 5th year senior.

113.   LHRP Hunter Cervenka 6’1” 215 Lbs (199001) [2008-27, acq mid-2012 from BoSox] In 2012, 71/33 K/W in 62 IP in SAL/MWL & FSL (0.252 BAA) Promoted to FSL after pitching well in Cub debut at PEO.  Ok thereafter.

114.   CF/LF Roberto Caro 6’0” 185 Lbs S/R (199309) [DO-2011] In 2012, 0.314/0.418/0.403 in 223 DSL PA. 15/23 SB. 29/32 K/W.

115.   RHRP Hayden Simpson 6'0" 170 Lbs (198905) [2010-01, Southern Ark] [2012 BA 29] 0.325 BAA and 16/29 K/W (38 IP) led to 2-step demotion from FSL to NWL. 47/22 K/W in NWL with 0.276 BAA (43 IP).

116.   RHRP Ryan Searle 6'0" 190 Lbs (198906) [2007-Australia] Mediocre year. In 2012,17/11 KW in 24.1 SL IP (0.277 BAA).  Demoted to FSL where 49/20 K/W in 59.2 IP (0.257 BAA).

117.   RHRP Jin-Young Kim 6'1" 190 Lbs (199204) [2010, Korea, $850K] In 2012, 14/4 K/W in 17 AZL IP (0.250 BAA).

118.   RHRP Austin Reed 6'3" 200 Lbs (199110) [2010-12, CA HS] Stuff exceeds performance. In 2012, moved to bullpen and posted better numbers, 49/24 K/W in 61 MWL IP (0.283 BAA).

119.   LHRP Casey Harman 6'1" 210 Lbs (198903) (2010-29, Clemson) In 2012, 43/11 K/W in 55 SL IP but 0.300 BAA and 10 HRA.

120.   LF/RF Yasiel Balaguert 6’2” 215 Lbs R/R (199301) (Cuba via DR, 2012; $400K).  Put up mediocre numbers in AZL (0.235 BA) followed by pathetic numbers in MWL. 0.208 BA with no power (0.054 ISO) or batting eye (only 5 walks).  Still young.

121.   CF/LF Rashad Crawford 6’3” 185 Lbs S/R (199310) [2012-11, GA HS] 0.167/0.324/0.167 in 37 AZL PA.  Plus plus speed.

122.   CF? Evan Crawford 6'1" 165 Lbs R/R (198808) [2009-09(Giants), Indiana U, for
Fontenot] In 2011, 0.307/0.362/0.401 in 446 FSL AB (32-38 in SB).  2011 FSL postseason allstar team. Injured in 2012. 

123.   LHRP Nathan Dorris 6’3” 185 Lbs (199012) [2012-17, Southern Illinois] FB velocity fluctuates but can reach 90-91.  When pitching well also has effective curveball. 13/7 K/W in 14 NWL IP (0.235 BAA).  Late round steal (BA?)

124.   C Rafael Lopez 5'9" 190 Lbs L/R (198710) [2011-16, FSU] Split time between MWL and FSL.  Hit 0.269/0.338/0.403 in 132 FSL PA. MWL mid-season allstar in 2012.

125.   CF/RF Kelvin Encarnacion 6'0" 175 Lbs S/R (199111) In 2012, repeated DSL again, but did post encouraging 0.308/0.447/0.465 line in 211 DSL PA.

126.   SS/2B Jenner Emeterio 6’1” 170 Lbs (199303) In 2012, 0.281.0.374/0.394 in 189 DSL PA. 

127.   RHSwing Pedro Araujo 6’3” 214 Lbs (199307) [2011-DR, $100K] In 2012, 47/12 K/W in 53 DSL IP (0.245 BAA).

128.   LHRP Jeff Lorick 6'0" 195 Lbs (198712) [2009-20(Braves)] In 2012, after dominating in MWL (0.148 BAA in 17 IP) posted 41/18 K/W in 39 FSL IP (0.295 BAA).

129.   RHSwing James Pugliese 6'3" 195 Lbs (199208) [2011-18, NJ CC] In 2012, 51/22 K/W in 60 NWL IP (0.307 BAA)

130.   SS Francisco Sanchez 6'2" 170 lb R/R (199312)[DO-2010] $350K bonus. In 2012, repeated DSL with slightly worse numbers: 0.196/0.242/0.330 in 204 DSL PA (64/10 K/W and 7-12 SB).

131.   RHSwing Justin Amlung 6’1” 180 Lbs (199005) [2012-12, U Louisville] 2nd in career wins & ERA at Louisville. Features low 90sFB, average slider, and so-so changeup. In 2012, struggled during 12 IP NWL debut. 6/4 K/W (0.404 BAA).

132.   LHRP Sheldon McDonald 5’11’ 205 Lbs (198811) [2011-33; British Columbia College] 57/16 K/W in 62 MWL IP (0.205 BAA; 0.98 WHIP)

133.   RHRP Corbin Hoffner 6’5” 235 Lbs (199307) [2012-14, FL St. Petersburg CC]. Impressive size. Has OK FB, changeup and slider. In 2012, 13/4 K/W in 12 AZL IP (0.288 BAA).

134.   RHRP Steve Perakslis 6’1” 185 Lbs (199101) [2012-21, Maine] Solid low 90s FB but secondary stuff is work in progress. In 2012, 26/6 K/W in 25 AZL IP (0.230 BAA).

135.   LHSP Angel Mejias 6'3" 180 Lbs (199310) [VE, 2010] 57/23 K/W in 69 DSL IP (0.233 BAA).

136.   C/3B/1B Taylor Davis 5’11” 185 Lbs (198911) [2011-FA, Morehead St] 0.902 OPS in 73 MWL PA followed by 0.627 OPS in 178 FSL PA. 24/21 K/W in FSL. 

137.   3B/1B Ben Carhart: 5’10” 200 Lbs  R/R (199001) [2012-35, Stetson U] In 2012, 0.353/0.419/0.456 in 151 AZL PA against (mostly) much younger pitchers. Natural hitter with gap power and strong arm.

138.   C Yaniel Cabeza 5'11" 185 Lbs R/R (198904) (2010-Cuba, $550K) Defensive standout with very weak bat. In 2012,  0.197/0.233/0.245 in 218 MWL PA.     

139.   LF: Dong-yub Kim 6'4" 200 Lbs R/R (199007) [Kor-2011] In 2012, 0.250/0.288/0.455 in 116 NWL PA. Displayed good power (0.205 ISO) but poor K/W (33/4).

140.   C Alberto Mineo 5'11" 165 Lbs L/R (199307) (2010-Italy, $225K) In 2012, struggled in US debut: 0.157/0.295/0.157 in 61 AZL PA.

141.   RHRP Mike Hamann 6’3” 165 Lbs (199101) [2012-16, U Toledo]  Arthroscopic shoulder surgery  in 2011.  Struggled early in 2012, but recorded a 2.12 ERA over his final five starts for Toledo.  Low 90s FB when used for short stints. Also has slider & curve. 6/2 K/W in 10 NWL IP (0.262 BAA).

142.   LHSwing Chris Pieters (199403) [2011-Curacao] 24/47 K/W in 33 DSL IP (0.237 BAA).

143.   RHswing Ethan Elias 6’3” 180 Lbs (199304) [2011-22, Alberta HS] member of Canadian Jr. Nat’l Team. 22/6 K/W in 30AZL IP (0.311 BAA).

144.   LF/RF Xavier Batista 6'3" 190 Lbs R/R (199201) [DO-2008] Led his DSL team in HR in 2011.  In 2012, 0.198/0.283/0.335 in 186 NWL PA. 0 SB. 0.154 BA vs RHP.

145.   RHRP Larry Suarez: 6'4" 245 Lbs (198912) (2006-VZ) In 2012, Shelled in FSL.  Demoted to MWL where he posted 38/21 K/W in 43 IP (0.281 BAA).

146.   C Carlos Escobar 6’2” 185 Lbs R/R (199012) [2012-15, U Nevada]  Good receiver/blocker with average arm. Quiet swing that gets long at times. In 2012, 0.234/0.358/0.390 in 92 PA between AZL (31PA) and NWL.

147.   3B/LF/RF Anthony Giansanti 5'10" 190 Lbs (198809) [2009-49(Athletics)] Best OF arm in system (BA2012). Injuries limited his PA in 2012. Spent most of year in MWL again. 0.696 OPS in 106 PA. 

148.   RHRP Su-Min Jung 6'2" 190 Lbs (199004) [KR-2009] In 2012, 25/18 K/W in 25 NWL IP (0.196 BAA). Control still a big concern but improving.

149.   LF/RF Ty Wright 6'0" 200 Lbs R/R (198502) [2007-07, OK St] 0.287(0.348 OBP) in 230 PCL AB.  Little speed and only a smidgen of power. Missed last 2 months of 2012 with injury.

150.   RHSwing Brett Wallach 6'5" 205 Lb (198812) [2009-03(Dodgers), Orange Co CC]
 [2011 BA17]   Hit hard in FSL in 2011 and early 2012.  Out with injury since then.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 16, 2013, 07:35:08 pm
Final consensus top 150:

Baez and Soler ended up tied with 77 points in the final ranking.  I placed Baez first based on more 1st place votes.



Thanks for the effort in this.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 16, 2013, 08:31:18 pm
That is silly.  If Vogelbach can't play left, he sure can't pitch.

Moran
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on January 17, 2013, 09:51:51 am
Two words: Rod Beck.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 17, 2013, 09:53:25 am
"You can't pull fat."

- Rod Beck
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 17, 2013, 10:32:20 am
I thought that was John Kruk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 17, 2013, 02:03:47 pm
Alberto Cabrera is having an interesting winter.  He's been starting some games.  Winter-league usage is often inconsistent, and I wonder how in shape a guy is at the beginning. 

He finished like 10th in K's during the "regular" season, with 20K in 14.1 IP.  I think the other guys ahead of him all had 30 or more innings. 

Had a 3.14 eRA during the "regular" season, mostly relief, 20K/13BB.  Started his last regular-season game (10K/6BB/4IP?  Weird....) and perhaps one other. 

He's apparently doing well in the playoffs.  He's had 4 playoff starts, on a 6-day rotation, went only 4 innings yesterday but 5 or 5.1 in each of previous 3.  0.92 ERA, 19K/6BB/19.2 innings.  Funny start yesterday, Had 7K/0BB in 4 innings, but still allowed 6 hits.  It's seemed that in the minors, he also allowed a lot of hits despite having quite a few K's.  He's allowed BA over .300 at many of his recent minor league stops, despite often having excellent K-rates.

Just bad BABIP luck?  Or might he be a case of a guy who throws a lot of fastballs without good command, and gives up a lot of fastball hits?   But if he can get to 2-strikes he can often put you away with the slider? 

Anyway, I'm rather encouraged by his winterball progress.  Obviously has very good arm, and he's now 24.     
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 17, 2013, 02:30:59 pm
If I remember right, Cabrera also threw a lot of sliders.  Perhaps some of them didn't slide.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on January 17, 2013, 03:06:08 pm
Wild in the strike zone a bit too much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on January 17, 2013, 04:31:35 pm
A Prior sighting:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chi-cubs-prior-20130117,0,2449043.story
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on January 17, 2013, 07:00:28 pm
There's just something in Cabrera's mix that makes the whole less than the sum of the parts.  He's hittable, and I suspect always will be.
Title: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 17, 2013, 07:26:49 pm
http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/Cubs-putting-Javier-Baez-on-the-fast-tra?blockID=824511&feedID=10336&awid=6105853816018310651-914
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 17, 2013, 09:07:17 pm
I thought a Saber maxim was that BABIP doesn't vary much between control pitchers versus wilder guys?  Or do guys wild in the strike zone have a consistently really high BABIP?  Or is the BABIP bundle only true for guys who are good enough to last for years in the majors, so guys who are outside the bundle get kicked out of the league? 

Garza/Dempster/Villa/Samardz/Wood/Maholm, none of them have 2-year BABIP outside of the normal .275-.305 range.  Even Volstad's 2-year BABIP is "only" .315.   

Cabrera's minor league BABIP allowed over the last two years is over .360.  http://minorleaguecentral.com/player?pid=501227&split=3000  .359 against righties, .375 against lefties. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 17, 2013, 09:12:07 pm
Yeah, BABIP doesn't vary much for major league pitchers.  If a guy is a major league caliber pitcher, his BABIP isn't going to be that far from .300 over time.

Of course, if a guy isn't major league caliber, his BABIP can be much, much higher.  Maybe Cabrera's IP sample over the last two years is still small enough that it's just a fluke.  Or it may just be that he's hittable, and will never make it in MLB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on January 17, 2013, 09:43:08 pm
Keep in mind that Cabrera is a 2-pitch pitcher who was a starting pitcher until 2012. Converted to relief, he struck out out 101 batters in 77 innings.  The 2 pitches: a plus slider and a 93-94 fastball.  That's what is kind of interesting about him. And, he was not hit hard in the majors. His problem in the majors was walks.

He gave up hits in the minors in 2012, but with low walks---the opposite of what happened in the majors. So, that might be figuring out working relief, I don't know. Maybe he's deficient in toughness or make-up, I don't know. The hits allowed as a starting pitcher---that's a 2-pitch guy working as a starter.

So, I see an interesting guy who needs to cut down on some poor pitches in the zone but who has really good stuff as a reliever.   In today's game, you need a bunch of power arms in the bullpen and he has a decent chance to be one of those arms.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 18, 2013, 09:17:24 am
Quote from: Bruce Miles
On the fast track:

The rookie camp was mainly for players deemed close the major leagues or at least ready for higher-level play in the minor leagues. Among those attending were pitchers Trey McNutt, Dallas Beeler, Nick Struck and Rob Whitenack. Position players included Logan Watkins and Matt Szczur.

Even though Baez played only as high as Daytona last year, he's considered a fast-tracker.

"It's been very good," said the 20-year-old Baez. "I'm not in shape yet. That's what we're working on. But I'm almost there."

McLeod said he still sees Baez as a shortstop, even though Starlin Castro holds that job with the big club. Baez had a line of .333/.383/.596 with 12 homers last year at Peoria before struggling at Daytona, hitting .188. He also suffered a hand injury last season. He says the hand is better now.

http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20130117/sports/701179713/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 18, 2013, 10:44:46 am
Good. The kids looks to be as special as any we've had in a long time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 18, 2013, 01:18:35 pm
Baez, Szczur, Watkins, that's three. 
McNutt, Whitenack, Beeler, Struck, that's four. 

I wonder who the other 5 were? I'm guessing this is probably for guys who haven't made it yet, but are apparently relatively advanced leagues.  So I'm guessing Vitters and Jackson no, nor Raley. 

I'd guess Rosscup.  I'd wondered why he was invited to convention, but he's probably in town for both.  I'd guess maybe Austin Kirk?  If Beeler is in, I'd think Rosscup and Kirk would be in that value level, or higher. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on January 18, 2013, 01:57:50 pm
Pitchers Dallas Beeler, Marcus Hatley, Barret Loux, Trey McNutt, Zach Rosscup, Nick Struck, Robert Whitenack and Tony Zych, and position players Javier Baez, Jae-Hoon Ha, Matt Szczur and Logan Watkins.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 19, 2013, 09:53:32 am
Heard two minutes of Theo at convention on WGN last night, and a second after it came on he was asked about draft.  He noted that studies show value has been better on players than pitchers in the first round, and in the second, but that good pitchers often pop up later in the draft.  If they do pick a player with first pick, then he said it would be arm after arm after arm after that, like last year. 

I can't remember his exact phrasing, or the nuances of how the question was phrased and how his initial response was phrased that he was then modifying. 

But obviously this draft is particular and not some historic average, so who knows what they'll do.  But it seemed pretty clear that despite taking players the last two years, and despite Theo's comments that the system was/is weaker in rotation candidates, that it's not a given that they'll take one of the college pitchers with their first pick.  If a player emerges who is good enough to justify going #2, tiebreaker may not necessarily go to the pitcher. 

I hope so, at any rate.  With a high pick, you should have a good chance to identify a really good player or pitcher.  If you do, a really good player might be really good and stay really good for many, many years.  But even if a pitcher is really good when you pick him, and is still really good if/when he reaches the majors, the odds that he stays really, really good for many, many years isn't as high. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 19, 2013, 10:01:01 am
Pitchers Dallas Beeler, Marcus Hatley, Barret Loux, Trey McNutt, Zach Rosscup, Nick Struck, Robert Whitenack and Tony Zych, and position players Javier Baez, Jae-Hoon Ha, Matt Szczur and Logan Watkins.


With the exception of Baez, all 12 seem to be players that could have a chance to be called up to the majors this year.  Not a large chance, but certainly not a zero chance.  Makes you wonder  if they think Baez is really that far from the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 19, 2013, 10:10:00 am
It has been interesting how Theo has repeatedly mentioned the system being weaker in rotation pitchers than players, seemingly both when they came in last year, and still today.  I'm not sure I'd have thought that, depending on what exactly he means.  Certainly true entering last year for full-season guys.  We basically had zero good rotation prospects who had any full-season experience entering last year.  McNutt and Kirk and Raley being your best rotation arms? 

But I'm not sure I see it the same now, if I include short-season guys.  I've been thinking that Johnson, Paniagua, Underwood, Maples provide some nice long-term projection talents.  Blackburn, Whitenack, Wells, Jensen, Arias, Scott, there's some volume of guys who might end up having solid rotation stuff, even if not Wood/Prior/Zambrano-esque. 

Why might I be perhaps seeing it differently than Theo:
1.  Perhaps I'm overrating the potential of some of those arms. 
2.  Perhaps Theo has more in mind full-season guys than total-projection short-season guys. 
3.  Perhaps I'm underestimating the value of some of the position guys.  Does Theo take guys like Lake/Jackson/Vitters/Szczur/Villanueva/Watkins+2B's more seriously than I do?
4.  Theo is really prioritized by stud prospects.  Even if Whitenack or Jensen work out to their ceiling, they're not likely to be dominating post-season aces.  So maybe he's not thinking about the best 25 prospects, but only the top six or so with big-impact possibilities? 

 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 19, 2013, 11:46:21 am
But even if a pitcher is really good when you pick him, and is still really good if/when he reaches the majors, the odds that he stays really, really good for many, many years isn't as high.

Exhibit 1 -- Mark Prior.

Exhibit 2 -- Kerry Wood.

Exhibit 3 -- Lance Dickson

And there are so many more exhibits in there it gets depressing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 19, 2013, 12:57:41 pm
Craig, I wonder how much that had to do with several years of high round drafts of pitchers blowing up on us.

My memory for names is terrible, but there's the Wichita State guy who hit a player ondeck, the Boise kid Pawlewek or whatever who amounted to zilch, Browning who was damaged, Simpson (will we ever hear the end of that).  Those are over a long period of time, but it does seem like there would be some pitchers in the pipeline if we hadn't swung and missed so often.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 19, 2013, 01:47:15 pm
Absolutely, as it applies to the Cubs. 

Theo was talking about league-wide study, though; it's not just Cubs.  No matter how hard you throw at 18 or 21, the odds just aren't that great that you're still throwing real hard at 28 or 31.  Some do, of course, but not all that many.  But the ability to drive a ball doesn't so often deteriorate during your 20's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 19, 2013, 02:13:39 pm
I think it is a valid point that pitchers are much more likely to fall by the wayside early because of injuries.  But I doubt that too many teams take into account how a draftee is likely to perform in their 30s.  The odds of ANY draftee, and especially a teen age draftee is still with his original team far into his thirties is rather low.  I have not seen any numbers, but my gut feeling is that less than 1 out of ten top prospects that are drafted are still in the same organization 12 years later.  Trades and free agency take their toll on the vast majority.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 19, 2013, 03:06:43 pm
No matter how hard you throw at 18 or 21, the odds just aren't that great that you'll still throwing that hard by the end of your club-controlled years.  Some do, of course, but not all that many.   But the ability to drive the ball doesn't so often deteriorate during the club-controlled years. 

The club-controlled years are minors plus 6.  Most draftees will be under club control for almost ten years, or more.  (Baez will take at least 9, unless he breaks camp with the big club this spring...)  With roundoff simplicity, club-controlled years = about 10 years.  So teams should be thinking at least club-controlled = ten years out. 

Some pitchers do, but most pitchers don't hold their stuff for ten years.  Most players do hold their most important hitting tools for ten years (and more).  I think that's what Theo's study seems to reflect. 

I think that teams probably do look beyond just the club-controlled years.  The Cardinals wouldn't have won as many World Series if they'd just kept Pujols through club-control.  Theo has already extended Castro well beyond his club-control years, and that's becoming common practice. 

I suspect the study is looking at big-league production.  A lot of the "impact" success stories from the draft that skew the numbers in favor of 1st-round position players are probably guys who weren't washed up by age 30.  There are lots and lots of those. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on January 19, 2013, 03:16:15 pm
No matter how hard you throw at 18 or 21, the odds just aren't that great that you'll still throwing that hard by the end of your club-controlled years.  Some do, of course, but not all that many. 
Some pitchers do, but most pitchers don't hold their stuff for ten years.   

That's what makes guys like Nolan Ryan and Sandy Koufax so remarkable.  Of course, the other side of the coin is Roger Clemens.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 20, 2013, 03:05:29 pm
http://vineline.mlblogs.com/2013/01/20/cubs-convention-live-down-on-the-farm/

Down on the farm session from the convention summarized.  Very different from the old there was often a lot of talk about specific prospects.  Almost no scouting comments on specific prospects.  (I'll post the one vaguish scouting comment on the next post.)  Some things that I found interesting. 

1.  Peoria -> Kane County.  Closer for rehab, close enough for management to go watch a night game after a Wrigley day game.
 
2.  Rotation vs relief:  '“A simple checklist for us is they have a starter’s delivery, a starter’s frame, a starter’s repertoire and a starter’s ability to throw strikes.” When players start to miss points on that checklist, they may say it’s a guy that fits better in the bullpen.'

The frame stuff seems more Hendry drafts than Wilken.  Wilken was pretty open to smaller guys.  Doesn't bode well for Jensen.  Sort of interesting that repeatable delivery and throwing strikes are viewed as starter qualities.  Personally I'd think those are rather desirable qualities for relievers, too!  May suggest that if/when a prospect gets moved to relief, it's a pretty seriously bad sign.  If you're going to relief because you can't repeat delivery or throw strikes very consistently, you're probably going to be inconsistent at best in relief as well. 
 
3.  "Hyde says that plate discipline is a tough area to teach. Anthony Iapoce is the new hire with James Rowson being kept as big league hitting coach. The whole organization has bought into the mantra of players getting a good pitch to hit and to stay in their strike zone, the areas where they have success. It’s about coaching the player—drills can help, but it’s largely about making players aware that it’s 100 percent bought into that philosophy."

Rowson also commented at the convention that the "discipline" thing is about not swinging at bad pitches.  Didn't appear to be any explicit issue with taking more walks.  But if you don't swing outside the zone, you'd guess more walks would follow.  "Stay in strike zone" seems a simple enough concept to both monitor and to sell.  Pretty hard to do, though, and harder to learn.  If you don't have it, is it a teachable skill?  Baez and Almora seem like two nice case studies.   

4.  The biggest one to me:  "McLeod says one of the biggest improvements in the last year was the installation of cameras at ***every*** minor league affiliate, allowing them to monitor progress on a daily basis."  Must be awesome for the bosses to watch whatever they want from the office, and have it all on tape.   

But that would also seem to be essential for the plate discipline stuff.  Hendry and Fleita could tell guys to "stay in strike zone".  But how could they assess or show?  But if every AB is on film, the evidence/feedback would be a lot better.  Nice for self-scouting on your pitchers.  To have the actual velocity distribution for every pitcher, for example, seems really nice.   Encouraging news. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 20, 2013, 03:38:28 pm
The only prospect for whom any scouting perspective was shared was Vogelbach.  (Note:  this was a VineLine recap, so perhaps there were other comments made about prospects that they didn't include in their recap.  Vineline will have their prospect issue next month, so I suppose maybe they saved some of the comments for that.  But, doesn't seem likely.....) 

Quote
9:50 A fan asks about Dan Vogelbach, a bat-first player in the low minors. Hyde says that he’s really going to hit—his performance pushed the organization to promote him to Boise, and he had a great month or so with the bat. He’s athletic and has made a commitment to improve his body. “He should be able to be a good defender. Whether we move him off first base in the next couple years remains to be seen. We’re going to let him hit and feel confident that he can be a middle-of-the-order bat.”

Law may disagree, Callis may not have found any scouts who agree, or Hyde might be lying or just plain dumb.  (Fleita kept saying positive stuff about Jake Fox's catcher defense for years at the Down-on-the-Farm sessions, so who knows if Hyde is any smarter or more honest.) 

But this seems like the strongest and most favorable comment on Vogel's defense that I've seen.  Have we ever before seen "good" in the same sentence with Vogelbach and defense? 

The board has had plenty of mockers for even wondering whether a move to LF might be possibly feasible.  Hyde raises the idea himself, unprompted.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 20, 2013, 08:09:18 pm
4.  The biggest one to me:  "McLeod says one of the biggest improvements in the last year was the installation of cameras at ***every*** minor league affiliate, allowing them to monitor progress on a daily basis."  Must be awesome for the bosses to watch whatever they want from the office, and have it all on tape.   

But that would also seem to be essential for the plate discipline stuff.  Hendry and Fleita could tell guys to "stay in strike zone".  But how could they assess or show?  But if every AB is on film, the evidence/feedback would be a lot better.  Nice for self-scouting on your pitchers.  To have the actual velocity distribution for every pitcher, for example, seems really nice.   Encouraging news.

It would be very interesting to know the degree to which this sets the Cubs apart from other systems, or if other systems are installing the same capability at the same time, or if other systems think it's foolish, or if other systems did this some time ago and the Cubs are only now catching up.

It would also be interesting to know the degree to which it is also used to scout opposition prospects when they are playing in Cub facilities.

It would seem that the complete video recordings would allow more complete scouting, by more sets of eyes, than a scout assigned to watch a particular prospect or two on another organization's farm system.

And if other organizations are not doing the same thing, or not doing it as thoroughly as the Cubs, one of the more important competitive advantages it might create is in finding undervalued talent in other farm systems.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 20, 2013, 08:12:18 pm
    9:50 A fan asks about Dan Vogelbach, a bat-first player in the low minors. Hyde says that he’s really going to hit—his performance pushed the organization to promote him to Boise, and he had a great month or so with the bat. He’s athletic and has made a commitment to improve his body. “He should be able to be a good defender. Whether we move him off first base in the next couple years remains to be seen. We’re going to let him hit and feel confident that he can be a middle-of-the-order bat.”

Yea, but what does Hyde know?

Law's opinion is gold.

I'm tellin' ya, that fat boy can barely haul himself out of the dugout to roll out to firstbase.

No way he ever sees any time in the OF.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 21, 2013, 07:33:06 pm
http://vineline.mlblogs.com/2013/01/19/cubs-convention-live-from-draft-day-to-the-big-leagues/

Szczur, Whitenack, Zych, and Beeler.  Interesting. 

The most interesting bits were that Whitenack says he's about 90% back; and Zych says he was mostly a position player and never threw a breaking ball till he was 15 or 16.  My thought:  Zych's probably not as advanced or consistent with his breaking pitch(es) as you'd like, and gaining consistency/command is central to whether he'll succeed or not.  But if he started that late, perhaps it's not surprising that he's not as advanced as a warm-state guy who was focused on pitching from 7th grade on.  Not news, but says Zych's a mid-90's guy who touches 98.

Some guys are funny, or lack objectivity.  Dallas Beeler says he wants to be a Hall of Famer, and his goals are to win 20 games and throw a no-hitter.  Given that he had a WHIP of 1.6 last year, with hits/9 of 11.0, I'm not sure the no-hitter is very likely.....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on January 21, 2013, 08:58:34 pm
I thought the AA manager said Zych made some big strides with his slider this year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 21, 2013, 09:17:06 pm
I think he did.  But he didn't say what the starting point was.  I suppose going from terrible to just plain bad could be looked on as a great stride.

But I think it is better than that.  I would be willing to bet that Zych will be pitching in the majors before the season ends, barring injury.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on January 21, 2013, 10:14:18 pm
,
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 21, 2013, 10:19:15 pm
His fastball is obviously fast, and heh allowed only one HR last year, which might suggest good fastball movement.  He had a good score of K's, and obviously you don't K many guys on fastballs.  So a lot of those putaways must have been effective sliders.  And I'd think that with one HR, he must not have been hanging too many.  So that sounds like some pretty big strides with the slider, relative to where it was when drafted.  Still, my qualitative recall is that he was kind of inconsistent.  You know, 4K's in 2 innings one game, or one of those last-10-game things where it's 14K/2walks/11 innings, but then suddenly there'd be 3 walks and hits in his next outing.  And he had a bundle of walks at Tennessee.  So my guess is the slider has made a bunch of progress, and looks good when it looks good, but isn't always consistently there.  So I'm assuming if the consistency continues to improve with it, he's got a good chance. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 22, 2013, 09:14:40 am
I think he did.  But he didn't say what the starting point was.  I suppose going from terrible to just plain bad could be looked on as a great stride.

But I think it is better than that.  I would be willing to bet that Zych will be pitching in the majors before the season ends, barring injury.

He may well be... but between Zych, the Rule 5 draft pick pitcher who is going to burn a roster spot, the likelihood Jackson will be back in mid-summer and be worlds better than 2012, but still struggle, and the likelihood that the Cubs will give Lendy Castillo some more major league innings at some point... and it is just hard to see where the optimism about the 2013 W/L record comes from.

Soriano is 37 now, and it is very unlikely he will play as many games, or perform in 2013 close to as well as he did in 2012.  For those believing he will, you might want to take not of the fact that his 2012 OPS+ was 121, and he has only done that well 4 other seasons in his career, and that he has a career OPS+ of 113, 8 points less than what he did last year.  Other than folks using PED's you very seldom see the kind of career rejuvenation at age 37 a repeat would require.

For fans who care about the future, 2013 could be a very exciting season, but the most interesting action is still likely to be in the minors and the mid-season trades by the front office.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 22, 2013, 09:59:45 am
Lendy Castillo satisfied his Rule 5 stuff.  Will be interesting to see what gives with him this season.  Will he be AA, or down in Daytona?  Starter, or relief?  Will he still be with the organization?  He'd certainly appear to be on the group of possible DFA guys for if they ever elect to formalize the signing of Villanueva.  And if they end up signing another outfielder, whether that be Bourn or Hairston or somebody else. 

So, if they do add an outfielder and need to do two DFA's, some of the candidates would seem to be:  Castillo, Clevenger, Campana, Rusin, Raley, maybe Dolis.  Will be interesting to see who gets the DFA's.  Any guesses, assuming they do sign an outfielder and need not just one but two DFA's? 

I'd not expect to see much of Castillo, though, unless his minor-league work earns another shot.  I hope that happens.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on January 22, 2013, 10:13:56 am
I don't think the Cubs are going to be DFA'ing anyone any time soon.  They're past what is supposed to be the time limit on getting Villanueva added to the roster...so if they had the intention to DFA someone, they probably would've already done it instead of risking a fine from MLB.  I think it's more likely that they work out a 2 for 1 trade in the next day or two, or they trade a Hendry guy (Lake?  Szczur?  Vitters?) for a lower level non-roster guy that fits better with this front office.

Then if they sign an outfielder, they have 3 weeks or so to make another move.  At that point, we're into Spring Training.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 22, 2013, 10:55:59 am
He may well be... but between Zych, the Rule 5 draft pick pitcher who is going to burn a roster spot, the likelihood Jackson will be back in mid-summer and be worlds better than 2012, but still struggle, and the likelihood that the Cubs will give Lendy Castillo some more major league innings at some point... and it is just hard to see where the optimism about the 2013 W/L record comes from.

Soriano is 37 now, and it is very unlikely he will play as many games, or perform in 2013 close to as well as he did in 2012.  For those believing he will, you might want to take not of the fact that his 2012 OPS+ was 121, and he has only done that well 4 other seasons in his career, and that he has a career OPS+ of 113, 8 points less than what he did last year.  Other than folks using PED's you very seldom see the kind of career rejuvenation at age 37 a repeat would require.

For fans who care about the future, 2013 could be a very exciting season, but the most interesting action is still likely to be in the minors and the mid-season trades by the front office.

For more than 40 years, I have always been a minor league freak, consdering the draft and minor league performance more important than what is currently happening at the major league level.  And draft day this year will still be more interesting to me than what the MLB team does that day, or that week.  But the long range plan of the administration seems quite simple.  Build from within through the minor league system until you have a foundation of MLB quality players at every position at the major league level, and an equal reserve of MLB ready players in the high minors that can be called up when needed.

In order to do that, they have to survive as an organization, which means that they have to bring in enough money at the major league level to finance the flow of funds necessary to build and maintain that system.  Which means they have to fill enough seats at Wrigley to meet the massive interest payments, operating expenses and future investments as required, which means that they have to strike a balance between future growth and current performance.

The subject at hand was what the Cubs would do if Stewart performed through July at the level he did when first coming into the league.  You feel that they would trade him.  I feel that if they had a young, great fielding, good power hitting third baseman that could play for them for the next 5 years, they would keep him, unless, of course, they were offered such a deal that they couldn't refuse, which of course would apply to Castro, Samardzija or any other member of the team.

I think that the Cubs will continue to trade short term assets that do not fit into their long range plans.  I think that if Stewart performs as well as I mentioned (NOT PROJECTED), they would consider him to be part of their long range plans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 22, 2013, 11:00:26 am
I don't think that Lendy Castillo is on the bubble.  After keeping him on the team all last year, they now have the luxury of optioning him to the minors and giving his potential a chance to blossom - or wither.  But I doubt very much that he will be called up during before September at the earliest, unless as Craig says, his performance warrants it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 22, 2013, 11:49:35 am
I think the DFA candidates are Campana and one of Raley/Rusin. I expect to see Castillo starting in AA, with a possible demotion to high-A if the combination of his limited innings last year and his relatively limited experience as a pitcher lead to failure at Tennessee.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 22, 2013, 12:17:58 pm
I think the DFA candidates are Campana and one of Raley/Rusin. I expect to see Castillo starting in AA, with a possible demotion to high-A if the combination of his limited innings last year and his relatively limited experience as a pitcher lead to failure at Tennessee.

That makes sense.  Which do you think has better value between Raley and Rusin?  Personally I'd dump campana first.  He's never going to be very good defensively, and he's never going to be very good offensively.  So why bother?  I'd think Raley and Rusin each have a better shot to become servicable lefty relievers at some point. 

I don't think the Cubs are going to be DFA'ing anyone any time soon.  They're past what is supposed to be the time limit on getting Villanueva added to the roster...so if they had the intention to DFA someone, they probably would've already done it instead of risking a fine from MLB.  I think it's more likely that they work out a 2 for 1 trade in the next day or two, or they trade a Hendry guy (Lake?  Szczur?  Vitters?) for a lower level non-roster guy that fits better with this front office....

Maybe.  But I don't see why the logic is much different for trade than for DFA.  Agree, they didn't have the intention to DFA anybody, and have been avoiding that as long as possible.  But sooner or later they've got to do something.  They avoided doing that undesirable thing because they hoped a more desirable 2-for-1 or 1-for-nonroster trade would come along, but obviously they haven't done such a trade yet because nothing turned up that they like.  So, they've had a month with undesirable trades and undesirable DFA possibilities.  Not sure why it's likely that a desirable 2-for-1 trade will come up today when it hasn't during their previous 34 days of trying. 

But, sooner or later they'll have to do something, and settle for the least undesirable choice.  (Maybe they're already doing that to some degree, and have already been paying fines that weren't prohibitively large?) 

Either way, if the most undesirable thing thing is DFAing Tony Campana or Chris Rusin, it's not THAT undesirable!  I can well imagine some 2-for-1 trade in which they'd regret one or both of the guys given up a lot more than they'd regret losing campana. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on January 22, 2013, 12:33:26 pm
Chris, I don't see much difference between Raley and Rusin. They're both soft-tossing lefty starters who are probably destined for the bullpen at the major league level, and neither one has much of a track record as a reliever. But I agree with you - they're both more valuable than Tony Campana.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 22, 2013, 02:29:10 pm
Lendy Castillo satisfied his Rule 5 stuff.  Will be interesting to see what gives with him this season.  Will he be AA, or down in Daytona?  Starter, or relief?  Will he still be with the organization?  He'd certainly appear to be on the group of possible DFA guys for if they ever elect to formalize the signing of Villanueva.

I wouldn't suggest that there is any chance he will START the season in Chicago, but assuming he does well in AA or AAA in 2013, at some point he will likely get another meaningful look in the majors to try to measure his improvement.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on January 22, 2013, 04:44:59 pm
According to AZ Phil, Rusin can't be outrighted because of when he was added to the 40-man.  I think that means he could elect to be a FA if he is not claimed on waivers when DFA.   As Rusin's upside appears to be a #5 starter if everything falls into place for him, he would still be my first choice for a DFA.  Totally unimpressed with the guy.

As to Scott Hairston, I wonder if Cubs can offer him enough ABs to entice to sign here.  He probably wants close to 400 plate appearances.  Absent injury to somebody else, not sure if Cubs can give him that.  Like the guy and hope he signs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 22, 2013, 06:02:25 pm
what the Cubs would do if Stewart performed through July at the level he did when first coming into the league.  You feel that they would trade him.  I feel that if they had a young, great fielding, good power hitting third baseman that could play for them for the next 5 years, they would keep him, unless, of course, they were offered such a deal that they couldn't refuse, which of course would apply to Castro, Samardzija or any other member of the team.

His first three full seasons in the majors were not really three full seasons as a starter.  Two of the seasons he was clearly a platoon player, and that was even the case to some degree in the 3rd.  He also was NOT a "good power hitting thirdbaseman" in those three seasons -- he had an OPS+ those three seasons ranging from a low of 95 to a high of 102, for a average OPS+ of just below 100, or in other words just below league average, meaning if Stewart in 2013 hits as well for the Cubs as an everyday player as he did when playing as a platoon player in Colorado, he will still seem short of being a "good power hitting thirdbaseman."

So far the Theocracy has identified two position players who are "core players" -- Castro and Rizzo, and they have indicated that Barney is "close" to being a core player.  My understanding has been that they use "core player" to mean players around whom a team is built for an extended period of several years.

You apparently believe Stewart will be viewed that way if he hits about as well as the league average in 2013.  I don't think the Theocracy would view him that way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 22, 2013, 06:36:42 pm
Does the league average 25 - 30 home runs and a 280 average?

I had no idea.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 23, 2013, 09:59:10 am
Does the league average 25 - 30 home runs and a 280 average?

I had no idea.

Did anyone contend that the league average 25 - 30 home runs and a 280 BA?

I was responding to you contention about what
Quote
the Cubs would do if Stewart performed through July at the level he did when first coming into the league
, and I responded by pointing out that Stewart performed at slightly less than the league average during the period you referenced, and that is the best he has performed in his career, and he put up those league average numbers while playing at Coors Field as a platoon player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on January 23, 2013, 11:04:11 am
In his first full year in the majors, he had an OPS of 979.  If that is league average, I would be perfectly happy to have a league average hitter in every position.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 23, 2013, 01:38:26 pm
In his first full year in the majors, he had an OPS of 979.  If that is league average, I would be perfectly happy to have a league average hitter in every position.

Raw numbers do not put things in context.  An OPS+ does, but that is the least of the problems with your comment above (assuming you are still referring to Stewart).

First, the guy has never really had a "full year in the majors," or at least not where he was actually a regular the entire season.  He first appeared in the majors in 2007, and got 45 plate appearances, so I would assume you would agree that was not a full season.  Last year he had 202 plate appearances, so I would assume that doesn't qualify either.  In 2011 he had 136 PA, so I would assume you would agree that also should not count.  In 2008 he had 304 PA, or roughly half what you would expect for someone who actually played every day (and he also spent 69 games in the minors that year).    So I am assuming you would agree that 2008 can't count as his " first full year in the majors."  That leaves 2009 and 2010, both of them being seasons when he didn't play a single game in the minors.  In 2009 he had 491 PA and in 2010 he had 441.  True enough that he was "in the majors" the full season each year, he was not really close to being a regular either season.  He was largely used as a platoon player.

But setting aside whether 2009 or 2010 should be considered full seasons of play when he had fewer than 500 PA and was largely platooned, in neither season he did he come close to having a raw OPS of .979.  If the HAD done that well, even as a platoon player, I would be much more enthusiastic about him.

His raw OPS in 2009 was .785, and in 2010 it was .781.  His OPS+ figures were 95 and 97, respectively.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/stewaia01.shtml

The .979 OPS figure you reference would appear to come not from his "first full year in the majors," but instead his last partial minor league season before the "first full year in the majors."  That year he had a raw OPS of .979 at Colorado Springs in 298 PA.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=stewar001ian

So, to summarize, you want to use raw OPS instead of the more meaningful OPS+, use a raw OPS figure which comes from his minor league days and is close to 200 points better than he ever did in the majors, and then you reference his "full season" performance as if the guy was ever actually a regular, every day player in the majors who did whatever he did in the number of total plate appearances you would expect from someone playing every day.

So, other than that, I guess I could agree with that last post.....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on January 23, 2013, 07:20:11 pm
I assume the reason the Cuban guys want to sign with the Cubs is that the only pictures of Cubs' uniforms available in Cuba are of those old road uniforms from about 20 years ago where the cursive script looks like it says 'Cuba':
http://www.desipio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/cubs-cuba-uniforms-279x300.gif
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 27, 2013, 12:48:20 pm
MLB.com's 2013 Prospect Watch has Dan Vogelbach eighth on the 1B list

Quote
Scouting Grades (present/future): Hit: 4/6 | Power: 5/6 | Run: 2/2 | Arm: 4/4 | Field: 4/4 | Overall: 4/5

Two main things stood out as Vogelbach came out of high school in 2011: His power and his size. He didn't get to show it in games in 2011 after receiving an above-slot bonus, but it was on display at two stops in the Minors in 2012. He can hit the ball out of any park, to any field. He isn't a one-trick pony at the plate, though. He has excellent plate discipline with a lot of bat speed and projects to be a good all-around hitter. Vogelbach was overweight as an amateur, but he worked hard to trim down, something he'll have to watch for the remainder of his career. Even with better conditioning, he's a well-below-average runner who will never be better than average defensively, so his bat will have to propel him up the ladder.

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/prospects/watch/y2013/#list=1b (http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/prospects/watch/y2013/#list=1b)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 27, 2013, 04:38:14 pm
I liked those Cubs/Cuba jerseys.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 28, 2013, 12:40:53 pm
MLB.com 2013 Prospect Watch - Outfielders

9. Albert Almora, Cubs: While Buxton might have had the most tools of any high school outfielder in the 2012 Draft, Almora wasn't far behind. Taken No. 6 overall, the Florida high school standout is a veteran of USA Baseball and the international stage several times over. He has the offensive skills to be an above-average hitter, and he can drive the ball to all fields. He's shown glimpses of power, but he should grow into that as me matures. His instincts and work ethic are off the charts, which should allow all of his tools to play up as he progresses.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130126&content_id=41196270&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb&tcid=tw_article_41196270 (http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130126&content_id=41196270&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb&tcid=tw_article_41196270)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on January 28, 2013, 12:42:57 pm
Brett Jackson was 6th in 2011 and 5th in 2012. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Clarkaddison on January 28, 2013, 03:26:40 pm
I like the Cuba jerseys too.  I wish the Cubs would bring them back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 28, 2013, 05:06:24 pm
BA Prospect Handbook arrived today.  Here is the rest of the Cub rankings:

11.  Juan Carlos Paniagua
12.  Christian Villanueva
13.  Alberto Cabrera
14.  Matt Szczur
15.  Junior Lake
16.  Paul Blackburn
17.  Duane Underwood
18.  Dillon Maples
19.  Logan Watkins
20.  Marco Hernandez
21.  Gioskar Amaya
22.  Tony Zych
23.  Robert Whitenack
24.  Trey McNutt
25.  Josh Vitters
26.  Barret Loux
27.  Matt Loosen
28.  Lendy Castillo
29.  Marcus Hatley
30.  Trey Martin
31.  Reggie Golden
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 28, 2013, 05:18:56 pm
Notes:

Paniagua - Club officials saw FB sit at 94-98 and touch 100 in multiple inning stints.  Second best pitch is change with 82-84 mph slider more notable for velocity than break.  Some scouts think he's better suited for bullpen. 

Villanueva - 80 makeup, 70 defense, and questionable power.  Can hit for solid average and provide some doubles.  Potential for average power.  Fringy speed.  Defense is where he really shines.

Cabrera - Easy to dream on as a starter because he'll show 3 plus pitches at times.  FB ranges from 93-98.  Power slider added some bite after working with Chris Bosio. Lacks control and command.  Fairly straight fastball.

Szczur - Best athlete and fastest player in system.  Strong enough for average power but cuts off swing and rolls over on fastballs.  Solid centerfielder with average accurate arm. 

Lake - Tantalizing tools and inconsistent performance.  Scouts on other clubs see him as 3B or RF and some would like to see him try pitching.

Blackburn - Stands out for having best feel for pitching among draft class pitchers.  Works down in the zone and both sides of the plate with 90-92 FB that gets up to 94.  Hasn't filled out yet, so there could be more velocity in the future.  Athletic and repeats delivery well.  Cubs think he will have a plus curveball and promising change.  Ingredients necessary to be a #3 starter.

Underwood - Generally pitches at 91-94 but varies from 88-98 and doesn't always know where it's going.  Curve is also inconsistent.  Very athletic for a pitcher.

Maples - Main weapons are heavy 91-96 FB and hard curve.  Non-athletic delivery and short arm action turn scouts off.  Needs to add a changeup.  #2 starter ceiling.

Watkins - Interesting package of tools and aptitude to get the most out of them.  Sprays line drives all over the field.  Stronger than he looks, although only has gap power.  Needs to cut down on K's and attempt more steals.  Average arm and solid range fit best at 2B.  Versatile enough to play all over the diamond.  Biggest backers see an everday second baseman, but scouts outside the organization see a utility player. 

Hernandez - Can't match tools of Baez or Alcantara, but has no glaring weaknesses and better chance to stay at SS in long term.  Makes reliable contact and should have solid gap power.  Above average speed but still learning how to make the most of it on the bases. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 28, 2013, 05:33:33 pm
Amaya - Can do a little bit of everything but stands out for how easy it makes it all look.  Growing into sneaky power and has plus speed.  Range and arm aren't good enough for SS but solid at 2B.  Led NWL 2B's with .968 fielding pct.  Cubs love his makeup.

Zych - Same approach he had in high school, reaches back and throws as hard as he can with high effort delivery.  94-96 FB that reaches 99.  Delivery makes slider inconsistent, which can flatten out.  Arm action and lack of consistent second pitch leave most scouts hesitant to give him the closer stamp of approval. 

Whitenack - Was making a case for being the top pitching prospect in the organization before Tommy John.  FB had jumped to 89-96 pre-injury.  Scrapped knuckle-curve for more effective slider.  Stuff didn't come all the way back as FB resided around 90 mph and slider lacked bite.  Cubs weren't concerned about radar gun or stats.  Could develop into a #3 starter.

McNutt - Shorter stints gave FB boost to 94-95 mph.  Better suited for 6th inning until he can learn to throw more strikes.

Vitters - Still possesses strength, bat speed, short stroke, and feel for barrel that made him an elite draft pick.  Some scouts inside and outside organization feel comfortable projecting a .275/20 HR hitter.  Brings little intensity to ballpark.  Destroys left handers .331/.377/.625.  Fielding is only adequate at best. 

Loux - Simple repeatable delivery with good command on 90-92 FB.  Average slider and curve.  Most scouts like changeup the best.  Requires a long time to warm up, so his future is in the rotation.  Profiles as back of rotation innings eater.

Loosen - FB works at 89-95 with sharper curve than in the past.  #4 starter ceiling.

Castillo - FB ranges from 93-97 in short stints and sits at 90-93 when starting in the past.  Hard slider up to 86 but doesn't feature much break.

Hatley - 93-96 FB on downhill plane.  Mid 80's slider and upper 80's splitter flash plus ability.  Lacks deception and has inconsistent command, which leads him to get hit more often than someone with his stuff should.

Martin - Devon White comparisons for long gliding strides and effortless range in CF. Projectable frame, good hand eye coordination and long arms give him some power potential.  Long arms also lengthen his swing and can get tied up inside.  Above average speed but still trying to parlay that into stolen bases. 

Golden - Development hindered by injuries.  Still offers intriguing ceiling with strength and bat speed that give him above average power potential.  Made some progress with approach and discipline but needs a lot more at bats.  Should be a solid RF'er. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on January 28, 2013, 05:41:02 pm
Szczur is faster than Campana?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on January 28, 2013, 05:50:21 pm
I'm guessing they mean fastest runner in the minor leagues.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 28, 2013, 10:07:18 pm
Thanks, JR, very much!  Very interesting.  Always some surprises.  I'd not have expected Vitters quite that low, or Blackburn quite so high.   Interesting to see Loosen listed, and with some scouting. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on January 29, 2013, 05:44:34 pm
Valbuena is having a good winter.  Hit .306 with .912 OPS and .378 OBP in regular season (183 AB), now he's got the top Caribbean playoff average, .344 with a .944 OPS and .409 OBP in 84 playoff AB's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 29, 2013, 08:45:01 pm
MLB.com (Jonathon Mayo) ranks Baez #16, Almora #39 and Soler #42 best prospects in baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on January 30, 2013, 08:21:10 pm
Thanks for the update.

I'm surprised that Rondon didn't make the list.  Usually Rule 5 picks sneak into the bottom of the top 30.

Glad to see Loosen there.  His stats were great but its nice to see that Scouts like him too (a little bit at least). The stuff of 23rd round college draftees is often underwhelming.

Hatley also had another good season.  He was pretty well regarded before his many injuries.  Back to back top 30 years for him.

Torreyes went from #13 last year (in the Reds organization) to unranked this year. Ouch! Did his horrible start turn off scouts or did he shrink again?

Ben Wells did not make the list.  Must be a lot of concerns about his health.  He had a tremendous K/W last year for such a young pitcher.



Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on January 30, 2013, 08:26:27 pm
Ive never bought into Torreyes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 30, 2013, 09:54:52 pm
Torreyes went from #13 last year (in the Reds organization) to unranked this year. Ouch! Did his horrible start turn off scouts or did he shrink again?

While the bad start undoubtedly hurt, he finished quite well, and the poor start was a result of injury.  In Torreyes case, being off the list says much more about the quality of the list than it does the quality of the prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on January 31, 2013, 03:18:37 pm
Jonathon Mayo has released the next ten players after his Top 100 Prospects.  The Top 100 included Baez (#16), Almora (#39) and Soler (#42).  Brett Jackson came in at #105 and Arodys Vizcaino came in at #110.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 31, 2013, 04:56:24 pm
Jonathon Mayo has released the next ten players after his Top 100 Prospects.  The Top 100 included Baez (#16), Almora (#39) and Soler (#42).  Brett Jackson came in at #105 and Arodys Vizcaino came in at #110.

While positive, that is not much better than you would expect by random chance.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on January 31, 2013, 07:00:25 pm
That depends on how you define "much".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on January 31, 2013, 08:05:26 pm
Random chance would give most teams 2 players in the top 50.  The Cubs have 3.  So that is one better than a random chance.

If you assign a value of 50 points for the top rated prospect and reduce the point value per prospect so the 50th would be worth 1 point, the 3 Cub prospects (Baez #16, Almora #39 and Soler #42) would produce a total value of 53.

It is probably a bit better than average.  It certainly is better than anything since those heady days when we had three absolutely can't miss prospects (Choi, Hill and Patterson) in 2002... but it really is not much better than you would expect by random chance, and we have seen that while having three prospects in the top fifty makes us feel good about the future, sometimes that hope for the future is as good as things get.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 01, 2013, 10:52:37 pm
Bruce Miles at NSBB answering a question about Daniel Vogelbach possibly switching positions after spending time with Cubs brass at a Kane County Cougars meet and greet Friday evening:

Quote from: Bruce Miles
On Vogelbach, they (Brandon Hyde and Jason McLeod) seemed pretty adamant that he is not an outfielder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on February 01, 2013, 11:13:51 pm
That Bruce Miles quote from NSBB seems different from his tweet on this subject.

Bruce Miles ‏@BruceMiles2112
#Cubs Brandon Hyde says Dan Vogelbach is more athletic than meets The eye but says OF is not in near future plans

Maybe I'm being too literal, but this "near future" comment from Hyde doesn't seem to be adamant about Vogelbach not being able to play in the OF later.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 01, 2013, 11:41:16 pm
That Bruce Miles quote from NSBB seems different from his tweet on this subject.

Bruce Miles ‏@BruceMiles2112
#Cubs Brandon Hyde says Dan Vogelbach is more athletic than meets The eye but says OF is not in near future plans

Maybe I'm being too literal, but this "near future" comment from Hyde doesn't seem to be adamant about Vogelbach not being able to play in the OF later.

Words do mean things.

To some they simply mean different things than to others.

My expectation has been that the Cubs will want to seen Vogelbach hit in full season ball and establish a very good full season record there before they would do anything more than from time to time give him a bit of practice in the OF.  2014 could be different, but I have always felt it would be surprising if the Cubs were to toss him in the OF in games to deal with learning that before he has solidly established his hitting in full season ball.  After solidly establishing his hitting in full season ball, I would expect him to get some time in LF in some games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 02, 2013, 12:55:56 pm
it is a perfect example of how people hear what they want or expect to hear.  All Hyde said was that Vogelbach in the outfield is not in near future plans, and what he reported was that Vogelbach would NEVER be an outfielder.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on February 02, 2013, 02:42:48 pm
We're still at least another year or two from even having to worry about it. Give it time. Let things play themselves out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 02, 2013, 04:57:17 pm
We're also at least another year or two from even having to worry about the Cubs having a team on the field where there is any real chance of contending, but that won't prevent us from discussing the roster, personnel decisions or strategy moves.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 02, 2013, 05:26:17 pm
it is a perfect example of how people hear what they want or expect to hear.  All Hyde said was that Vogelbach in the outfield is not in near future plans, and what he reported was that Vogelbach would NEVER be an outfielder.

Of course, you can say the same thing about the other side.  Every professional prospect evaluator has more or less dismissed his ability to play anywhere but first base.  No one but a few Cubs fans seem to think he really has any chance of moving to another position.  Yet because the word near is in there, those few Cubs fans who think he can do it use that as evidence that it could happen.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 02, 2013, 08:14:30 pm
True.  The scouts that see him a couple times a year probably are in a better situation to evaluate him than those that watch him all year long.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 02, 2013, 11:03:24 pm
Every professional prospect evaluator has more or less dismissed his ability to play anywhere but first base.  No one but a few Cubs fans seem to think he really has any chance of moving to another position.

brjones, sometimes a person needs to make an argument to point out that you don't know what you are talking about.

Other times there really is no need.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 02, 2013, 11:53:17 pm
You guys are a riot.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 03, 2013, 08:05:12 am
Quote
Quote:
@BruceMiles2112 Fan asks about darkhorse player in #Cubs system. Austin Reed comes back as answer. @KCCougars


I think he flashed some pretty high velocities on occasion in relief, 96 for sure, maybe touched 98 or something.  He was viewed as an exciting arm his draft summer, but then stunk as a sophomore (6.08 ERA, 82H/5HR/34K/63IP as a sophomore.)  Showed some improvement at Peoria this season (67H/49K/4HR/61IP, 3.65 ERA).


Darkhorse is right.  But he was drafted as a good-arm infield-to-pitcher convert, so it's not surprising that his offspeed stuff hasn't been whiffing a lot of guys. 


My guess is if they mentioned him, that they probably liked something he was doing in instrux.   And if they mentioned him, they'll probably give him a shot as a starter/piggy-back, rather than just relief. 

Often looking good for a couple of showings in instrux is a lot easier than sustaining game after game in a real season.  But we'll see.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 04, 2013, 06:27:28 am
ESPN starts running their top prospect content today.  Org rankings today, top 100 tomorrow, and top 10 by organization on Wednesday (AL) and Thursday (NL).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 04, 2013, 09:49:40 am
Well, this was a pleasant surprise.  The Cubs rank very high on Keith Law's org rankings...fifth, to be exact.  They're only behind the Cardinals, Twins, Rays, and Astros.

Quote
5. Chicago Cubs
The Cubs' rebuilding process isn't much further along than the Twins' or the Astros' in terms of time, but they spent extravagantly in the international market before the new CBA's restrictions went into effect last summer, landing the Cuban toolshed Jorge Soler (and the Cuban flop Gerardo Concepcion, but we're not going to talk about him), then later using their international pool money on the Dominican pitcher with an electric arm currently known as Juan Carlos Paniagua, who has gone through more names than the thief known as Parker. The Cubs also scored big in last year's draft, addressing the system's lack of starting pitching candidates while also bulking up its depth in outfield prospects.

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/8902178/st-louis-cardinals-lead-keith-law-ranking-all-30-farm-systems-mlb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 04, 2013, 11:27:02 am
Quote
Juan Carlos Paniagua, who has gone through more names than the thief known as Parker

Excellent Leverage reference.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 04, 2013, 06:42:06 pm
Well, this was a pleasant surprise.  The Cubs rank very high on Keith Law's org rankings...fifth, to be exact.  ...

So, 5th on Law's ESPN list, 11th by BA, and top-10 by Sickels?  Not sure I'm remembering those exactly, but it seems like they're all ranking the Cubs quite highly. 

Fun to be generally viewed as a high-level premium system.  It's been since Cruz and those guys since the Cubs were viewed up in that group. 

As we know, Law is highly opinionated.  I think he probably likes Paniagua a lot, whom he saw a couple of times (at least) and reviewed favorably.  Not sure I'm remembering, but I thought he was also more enthusiastic about Johnson than some of the other draft evaluators, and saw him as a possible legit #2, rather than a #3-ceiling sort. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 04, 2013, 06:43:32 pm
I think the BA and Sickels rankings are much more realistic, given how anemic the Cubs system is at the upper levels and how many of our pitching "prospects" are pure lottery tickets.  But I agree with Law that Paniagua is a huge key, the most under-discussed top prospect in the system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 04, 2013, 06:46:36 pm
I think the Cub system is also relatively well positioned to rank even higher next year.  Usually teams that rank really high will graduate some of the names that get them there.  But other than Vizcaino, the names that are getting the cubs into the top 5-12 are going to be back next year. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 04, 2013, 06:53:10 pm
Law's top 100 comes out tomorrow.  With such a high rating of the system, I suspect he'll have five in the top 100--Baez around 15-20, Almora & Soler around 40, Vizcaino somewhere around 75 and Paniagua either in the bottom 10 or in the "next 10" list he gives as an extra.

But from his point of view, Brett Jackson will probably be nowhere close to the top 100.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 04, 2013, 07:05:43 pm
But from his point of view, Brett Jackson will probably be nowhere close to the top 100.

And do you think the Cubs would be likely to trade Jackson straight up for most of those names who will be ranked between 50 and 100?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on February 04, 2013, 09:41:36 pm
Law lives in Arizona so he has seen more of the Cubs top prospects, while Sickels and BA are going to go off scouting reports.  I wonder if that is why he has them so high.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 04, 2013, 10:32:41 pm
Law lives in Arizona so he has seen more of the Cubs top prospects, while Sickels and BA are going to go off scouting reports.  I wonder if that is why he has them so high.

Yes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 04, 2013, 11:10:29 pm
Law lives in Arizona so he has seen more of the Cubs top prospects, while Sickels and BA are going to go off scouting reports.  I wonder if that is why he has them so high.

But if Law is basing his opinion off what he saw of them in Arizona, for most prospects that means he is basing his opinion on his observations without actually seeing them in real games, and yet, because he has placed his own eyes on them, he is likely discounting scouting reports to some degree and giving greater weight to his personal observations, despite the limitations of those observations and the fact that generally speaking an entire season has passes since he made them.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 04, 2013, 11:51:46 pm
Law lived in Arizona during Extended Spring Training, the Arizona Rookie League and the Arizona Fall League, and may even have caught some pre-Spring Training workouts in Mesa. His knowledge of the Cubs' younger prospects isn't outdated at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 05, 2013, 12:25:07 am
Law also didn't think Vogelbach was ready for a promotion just before Vogs left to destroy the NWL.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 05, 2013, 12:34:10 am
Law seems to have a thing about Vogelbach.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 05, 2013, 09:12:38 am
Law's top 100 prospects:

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/8891538/mlb-top-100-prospects-2013-jurickson-profar-dylan-bundy-more

Cubs: Baez at 31, Almora at 33, Soler at 42, Vizcaino at 64.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 05, 2013, 09:39:52 am
Also, Jeimer Candelario makes the "just missed" list of the next 10 prospects:

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/8914765/henry-owens-10-prospects-just-missed-top-100-mlb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 05, 2013, 10:15:19 am
From another board

Keith Law is releasing his Top 100 prospects today, but he already released his Next Ten list of players who just missed out. Jeimer Candelario came in at #106…which helps explain the Cubs ranking #5 on his list. Have to figure the Cubs have at least four on the Top 100 list, if not five.

“He’s an offensive third baseman with great rhythm at the plate and a smooth swing, showing just enough to make you think he can stay at third base. I’d just like to see the offensive skill set translate into a little more performance before buying in all the way, because the defense will never be a plus. If you squint, you might see a Pablo Sandoval future here.”
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 05, 2013, 10:20:59 am
Law lived in Arizona during Extended Spring Training, the Arizona Rookie League and the Arizona Fall League, and may even have caught some pre-Spring Training workouts in Mesa. His knowledge of the Cubs' younger prospects isn't outdated at all.

So he would not have seen Soler, Baez, Almora, Vizcaino, or Szcuzr in full season ball or seen the last 300 PA of Candelario or 150 of Vogelbach, but his knowledge is not outdated?

The only guys Law is going to have current info on are so far away that they are very unlikely to make the top 100 of anyone's rankings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 05, 2013, 10:38:59 am
Law can talk to scouts and access statistics, you know.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 05, 2013, 01:47:28 pm
Law can talk to scouts and access statistics, you know.

Yes, the same as anyone else, but the fact that he watched prospects before they were even ready for Boise, and hasn't seem them sense, doesn't really give his opinion added weight.  When it appears that he at times allows his initial opinions resulting from his own observation to become rather rigid and he appears to ignore the performance and opinions of those who have actually seen the prospects in games and much more recently, then his personal observations actually may leave his rankings as less meaningful than those from others.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 05, 2013, 06:53:24 pm
Well, if Law thinks Candelario is the #106 prospect in baseball it's no wonder he has the Cubs system ranked too high.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: guest61 on February 05, 2013, 10:14:36 pm
I guess we've got more than we thought we did.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 07, 2013, 09:38:27 am
Keith Law's top 10 for the Cubs is out.  As much as he liked Paniagua, I'm surprised he's all the way down at #7.  He also seems to be a bigger fan of the Cubs' pitching than most teams we've seen so far.

Quote
Player, POS (Top 100 rank)
1. Javier Baez, SS (31)
2. Albert Almora, CF (33)
3. Jorge Soler, RF (42)
4. Arodys Vizcaino, RHP (64)
5. Jeimer Candelario, 3B
6. Duane Underwood, RHP
7. Juan Carlos Paniagua, RHP
8. Pierce Johnson, RHP
9. Paul Blackburn, RHP
10. Arismendy Alcantara, SS

Also, most teams only get one or two sleeper mentions (he defines "sleeper" as someone who could jump into the middle of the top 100 by next year).  He names four for the Cubs:

Quote
Sleeper

Aside from Jeimer Candelario, whom I discussed yesterday on the list of guys who just missed, I could see any of these guys jumping into the top 100: Juan Carlos Paniagua, who sits in the mid-90s with a plus slider but has very little pro experience after two years of suspensions; Duane Underwood, drafted at 17 and flashing velocity up to 96 with a very athletic body and quick arm; or Arismendy Alcantara, a plus runner and thrower who might end up at third but shows pop from both sides of the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on February 07, 2013, 09:43:03 am
Here's the link to the NL Central top 10 lists, by the way.  There is a video player at the top of the page that has a discussion of the Cubs farm system...I don't think it's behind the Insider pay wall.

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/8922469/national-league-central-top-10-prospects-team-mlb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 09, 2013, 12:10:24 pm
http://www.csnchicago.com/blog/cubs-talk/compiling-cubs-top-prospect-lists

It appears Law is a bit out of step in his prospect rankings.

Law has 3 guys in his top 10 who are not in the top 10 of the prospect lists of MLB,   BA, BP, FanGraphs, and Sickels, with two of them in Law's top 10 not in anyone else's top 20, and with only five of the prospects Law puts anywhere in his top ten also ranked anywhere in the other top ten ratings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 10, 2013, 10:38:38 am
From another board

Saw a video of Vogelbach taking batting practice. Kid is in much better shape. He looks like he's dropped 50 pounds from his high school days. Also, here's Audio of Keith Law talking to Waddle and Silvy about, among other things, how Cubs have never had a "legit top prospect" with a good approach at the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 10, 2013, 05:59:50 pm
From another board

Saw a video of Vogelbach taking batting practice. Kid is in much better shape. He looks like he's dropped 50 pounds from his high school days. Also, here's Audio of Keith Law talking to Waddle and Silvy about, among other things, how Cubs have never had a "legit top prospect" with a good approach at the plate.

Could you copy the audio link for us?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 11, 2013, 04:40:35 pm
Since the question of whether Vogelbach migh ever be able to play in the OF has been a matter discussed here before, with none of us actually having seen Vogelbach on the field, and since some have seemed to give great weight to the comment from Law (despite Law's limited to non-existent observation of him in Boise) to the effect that Vogelbach never would be able to play the OF, I wrote two reporters who actually covered Boise games regularly this past season to see what they think.

Below is my exchange with one of them.

On 2/11/2013 4:08 PM, Langrill, Chris wrote:
> Jes ... Sorry ... I am off on Sundays, an it looks like your last email came on a Sunday, and I passed it by somehow ...
>
> As for Vogelbach ... I wouldn't put it past him to play left field ... I specifically talked to him about his athleticism, and he takes pride in being more agile than people give him credit for ... I think he has the athleticism, but just needs more work with his glove more than anything ...
>
> That said, he never was even discussed in an OF role, as far as I know ...
>
> I do know that he was a team leader who seemed to be largely responsible for changing the team's attitude and leading Boise to the postseason ... could very well have been named league MVP if they split the season into two halves ...
>
> Bottom line: I'm a Cubs fan on the side, too, and I'd like to see them find a place for Vogelbach in the organization moving forward ...
>
> Thanks for writing and sorry for the delay in responding ...
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Jes Beard <jesbeard@usa.net> wrote:
>
>     Since I didn't see any response from either of you when I sent this question just more than a week ago, I thought I would send it again.
>     ********************************
>
>     I am writing you two as a Cubs fan, knowing that the two of you provided the primary coverage of the Boise Hawks for your newspaper.
>
>     Your personal and direct observations of Dan Vogelbach, and your discussions with those on and around the team, would likely give you considerably more insight into his future than my review of his batting stats, looking at a couple of limited video clips online, and seeing the occasional feature on Vogelbach or scouting report from an online publication where the person writing the report likely never actually saw him play.
>
>     The consensus  clearly is that Vogelbach is a bat first prospect, someone who will go as far as his bat carries him, reaching the majors if he hits, and not reaching the majors based on his other tools.
>
>     The question about Vogelbach on which I was hoping each of you might shed some light is whether there is any real possibility Vogelbach might in the future be able to acceptably play OF, at least LF.
>
>     Many of the online prospect sites have essentially written him off as never under any circumstances being able to play OF, that he scarcely is able to play 1BF, and that his future is almost certainly going to be as a DH.
>
>     As a Cub fan, well aware of the fact that Anthony Rizzo is most likely to be at 1B for the Cubs at the major league level for years to come, I am wondering what Vogelbach's future might be -- a move to LF, or as trade bait.
>
>     So what of Vogelbach?  Did you ever see him practice in the OF? Does his size or lack of speed or agility appear so sever that he would never be able to play LF?  Did anyone ever discuss the possibility of actually trying him in LF sometime in the future?
>
>     Thanks in advance for any insight you might share.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on February 11, 2013, 04:57:09 pm
Thanks, Jes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 11, 2013, 05:15:51 pm
Somehow I suspect that those who have refused to accept the possibility of Vogelbach in LF will continue to do so, and that even if he starts playing games there in the minors, they will still continue to insist that he won't be able to play LF in the majors.... you know, 'cause the ball carries different in the major league parks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on February 11, 2013, 11:20:37 pm
Cubs Den did a piece on Carlos Rodriguez from the DSL.  He had some scouting info from Ben Badler who said he threw upper 80's with 2 solid off speed pitches.  Command was decent without a lot of projectibilty left.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 12, 2013, 01:31:21 pm
From CubsDen

In case you missed it, Bleed Cubbie Blue had a video of Dan Vogelbach taking batting practice and he looks even leaner then when I saw him in October.  I'm not worried about the weight loss affecting his power.  Vogelbach is still a big, strong kid and he generates power in large part because of this powerful, yet efficient swing.  The biggest difference will be increased mobility at 1B.  If Vogelbach continues to mash at Kane County and takes a big step forward on defense, he will rise up those prospect charts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 12, 2013, 04:52:23 pm
From CubsDen

In case you missed it, Bleed Cubbie Blue had a video of Dan Vogelbach taking batting practice and he looks even leaner then when I saw him in October.  I'm not worried about the weight loss affecting his power.  Vogelbach is still a big, strong kid and he generates power in large part because of this powerful, yet efficient swing.  The biggest difference will be increased mobility at 1B.  If Vogelbach continues to mash at Kane County and takes a big step forward on defense, he will rise up those prospect charts.

That's great news.  I hope he keeps mashing and continues to stay healthy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 14, 2013, 12:59:21 pm
I hope the Cubs have Hayden Simpson recording MLB Network's The Next Knuckler on his DVR and then make him watch every episode on a loop.

Hell, add Casey Coleman and every crappy fringe pitcher to the season pass, too.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 15, 2013, 03:19:21 pm
http://boysofspring.com/daniel-vogelbach/

Vogelbach has a very nice swing and great approach at the plate, as evidenced by his 2012 stat-line of 17 HR’s in 245 at-bats, while hitting .322 with a .410 OBP. He was playing at the Cubs AZ Rookie League and Short-Season Boise, so it’s still a long way to reach Wrigley. Some so-called experts have said that he is a first base/DH only prospect, but much of that talk is from a year or more ago when he had a different body. I can tell you, having seen him quite a bit over the past six months, he’s a much better athlete than he is given credit for. In fact I saw him taking grounders at third-base a week ago at Camp Bussy. Don’t read to much into that, as the Cubs are not wanting to move young players from one position to another in the early stage of their careers. However, the left-handed hitting Voggy, does throw right handed. Having just gotten out of his teens less than two months ago, he’s definitely a prospect to keep an eye on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on February 15, 2013, 04:22:34 pm
Imagine an infield of Voggy at 3rd, Castro SS, Baez 2B and Rizzo at first.  Not that Voggy could ever handle it but offensively that would could be pretty exciting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 15, 2013, 06:47:47 pm
Not that Voggy could ever handle it...

Jimmie Foxx played 141 games at 3B.

Harmon Killebrew played 791 games there.

But of course, we all know that Vogglebach never could.

I mean, everyone knows the guy will barely be able to move and field well enough to DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on February 15, 2013, 07:14:57 pm
Some times you make statements hoping you are proven wrong.  This would be one of them.  I would love it if he could play there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 15, 2013, 08:39:35 pm
Robb, quite seriously I also have trouble imagining him at 3B, but the reason I mentioned Foxx and Killebrew is that both of them did establish that somewhat less than athletic, relatively beefy guys, who could hit the snot out of the ball, can sometimes be tolerated at 3B.

LF I really don't see as a reach.  3B?

That would offer an opportunity to really load a lineup.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 15, 2013, 09:35:12 pm
Oh dear lord.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 20, 2013, 11:47:24 am
Connor Glassey of BA had nice things to say about Dan Vogelbach: http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2013/02/our-picks-for-potential-2014-top-100-prospects/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 20, 2013, 01:21:07 pm
Connor Glassey of BA had nice things to say about Dan Vogelbach

Well, he's obviously an idiot.

On a more serious note, when Glassey mentions Vogelbach's "hefty, 6-foot, 260-pound frame," as if that is his current weight, when in fact it is about 30 pounds off, he does show that even if he is doing a better job of evaluating Vogelbach, he would appear to be seriously underestimating him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 21, 2013, 01:52:18 am
Quote
when in fact it is about 30 pounds off,

I don't think anyone knows what Vogelbach weighs at the moment. An assumption made by someone observing him doesn't mean anything in and of itself. Vogelbach himself said he was about 255 sometime around August of last year and we haven't heard anything since.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 21, 2013, 03:09:05 am
We will see.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 21, 2013, 03:28:18 am
Quote
I have seen reports of his weight, not his appearance, when he reported to camp.  That comment is about 30 pounds off.



Why haven't you posted those reports here then? We'd all like to know where he is weight wise right now.

I did a search and couldn't find any official reports on his current weight or a weight loss. The only thing I did find was a blog post by a guy I linked to last year who lives in Arizona and is at the Cubs' minor league complex. He says Vogelbach is "around" 240 right now though he doesn't say how he knows this. That number would be a loss of somewhere around 15 lbs from last summer.

Here is the link to that piece and some video of Vogelbach taking BP.

http://boysofspring.com/daniel-vogelbach/




Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 21, 2013, 03:44:44 am
I did a search and couldn't find any official reports on his current weight or a weight loss. The only thing I did find was a blog post by a guy I linked to last year who lives in Arizona and is at the Cubs' minor league complex. He says Vogelbach is "around" 240 right now though he doesn't say how he knows this. That number would be a loss of somewhere around 15 lbs from last summer.

That would still be 20 pounds off from Connor's number.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 21, 2013, 02:01:42 pm
I'm not vouching for the accuracy of Connor Glassey's "260 lb" comment. I'm sure he has no idea what Vogelbach weighs this very second.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 21, 2013, 02:38:24 pm
Well the source YOU offered put his weight at about 240.  I am betting that even that is about 10 pounds higher than it actually is, but let's accept it as 240.

Glassey was putting it at 260.

If he reported to camp at 240, the idea that saying he weighed 260 was because it was not a precise weight "too the second" is nonsense.

The simple reality with Vogelbach is that lots of folks -- fans here, scouts or columnists like Law or Glassey -- dismissed him because of the initial reports of his weight in HS, and continue to dismiss him or minimize him because of that impression, despite the fact that such impression no longer close to accurate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 21, 2013, 02:44:20 pm
I didn't vouch for the 240 lb assertion either. To my knowledge, Vogelbach's current weight has not been confirmed by anyone; just some people claiming he looks leaner. You said you have seen reports of a 30-lb loss and I can't find any such reports.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on February 22, 2013, 01:24:36 am
BA report on Cubs 2012 international signings.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/prospects/international-affairs/2013/2614761.html
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 22, 2013, 01:53:21 am
That BA link is only for subscribers. Not sure how many of those there are here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 22, 2013, 01:57:01 am
Various bits of news including a Robert Whitenack update:


Quote
On Thursday, Whitenack, 24, gave up one run on one hit and walked two over two innings in the Cubs' intrasquad game at HoHoKam Stadium. How's the arm feeling?

"It's better," said the right-hander, who was the Cubs' eighth-round Draft pick in 2009. "I have to adjust my release point. Now that my arm has full extension, I have a different release point. I have to adjust a little on the fly. But it's feeling really good -- I just have to take a step back and realize it's very early. It's hard not to let it go because it hasn't felt good in 18 months."


http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130221&content_id=41867322&notebook_id=41867578&vkey=notebook_chc&c_id=chc
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 22, 2013, 08:34:36 am
Quote
Starling Peralta - S - Diamondbacks

Rule 5 pick Starling Peralta has impressed early on during Diamondbacks' camp. Peralta, 22, has some work to do with his command, but he has a live arm that intrigues the D'Backs. "I don’t think right-handed hitters would be very comfortable standing in there against him," general manager Kevin Towers said. Barring an injury, Peralta will have a hard time cracking Arizona's Opening Day roster, as the rotation and bullpen appear set. It's possible the D'Backs will try to work out a trade with the Cubs in order to keep him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 22, 2013, 11:06:44 am
Chicago Cubs

Top signing: RHP Juan Carlos Paniagua, Dominican Republic, $1.5 million.
Six-figure signings: SS Frandy de la Rosa (Dominican Republic), SS Danny Gutierrez (Venezuela), RHP Ramon Valera (Venezuela), RHP Wagner Disla (Dominican Republic).
Notable Cuban signings: OF Jorge Soler, LHP Gerardo Concepcion.

The Cubs had an eventful year internationally, signing one of the top Cuban prospects, one of the most overpaid Cuban prospects, a Japanese professional free agent and two of the top international free agents from the Dominican Republic.

They also shuffled around their international decision makers in their first season under president Theo Epstein and general manager Jed Hoyer. In August, they fired vice president of player personnel Oneri Fleita, who had signed a four-year extension in September 2011 before Epstein and Hoyer took over. Fleita had previously run the Cubs Latin American scouting and was still involved in those operations, especially with Cubans. Louie Eljaua, who had been a special assistant to the general manager, became the team's international scouting director after the season. Paul Weaver, who had been the international director, was named an international crosschecker and coordinator for the Pacific Rim. Jose Serra remains as the organization's director of Dominican operations.

It was no surprise when the Cubs signed Cuban outfielder Jorge Soler. The organization had been connected to Soler long before he had been eligible or even legally allowed to sign. Once Soler became eligible to sign in June, the Cubs officially signed him to a nine-year, $30 million contract with a club-record $6 million bonus. Somehow Soler was able to quickly obtain a visa, while the other Praver Shapiro Sports Management clients who claimed permanent residency in Haiti like Yankees lefthander Omar Luis and Orioles outfielder Henry Urrutia have been stuck in visa limbo.

Soler, 20, is one of the top young players to come out of Cuba in years. Though he left Cuba before he had a chance to do anything in Serie Nacional, he performed well on Cuba's junior national team and was a standout in Cuba's junior national leagues. In Cuba's 16U national league in 2008, Soler hit .300 and slugged .518 in 156 plate appearances for La Havana, leading the league in walks (36) and tying for the lead in home runs (five). Two years later in Cuba's 18U national circuit, Soler hit .343/.526/.537 with 20 walks and 15 strikeouts in 97 plate appearances for La Havana. He lead the league in OBP, OPS and walks and ranked fourth in slugging. Soler also excelled at international tournaments. Scouts watched Soler at the 16U COPABE Pan American Championships in Mexico in 2008, then two years later he dominated at the 18U World Championships in Thunder Bay, Ontario in 2010.

Soler is 6-foot-3, 205 pounds and impressed scouts with his bat speed, plus-plus raw power, strike-zone judgment and hitting ability, although not all scouts were sold on his bat. Some scouts felt Soler's righthanded swing had an arm bar and some stiffness to it, but others saw him dominate in games. He runs well for his size with average speed and a strong arm in right field. Soler came up as a third baseman in Cuba but played outfield in Thunder Bay. Some teams thought his defensive routes needed a lot of work and his lack of focus in the field turned some off as well, but he has the tools to be a quality right fielder if he can make adjustments. He's slated to report to low Class A Kane County.

The Cubs have been one of the most active teams in the Cuban market, but they haven't seen much return on their investment. Their five-year, $6 million deal (including a $3 million bonus) with agent Jaime Torres for Cuban lefthander Gerardo Concepcion was immediately seen as a major overpay for a player some teams saw as having the upside of a fifth starter. Concepcion, 20, posted an unseemly 7.39 ERA with more walks (30) than strikeouts (28) in 52 1/3 innings over 12 starts for low Class A Peoria. He was getting hammered especially hard in the first inning of games, so the Cubs changed his approach to where he threw an inning in the bullpen before each start, which didn't do much. Then he got mononucleosis and was shut down at the end of June. After the season, the Cubs removed him from the 40-man roster and he cleared waivers.

Concepcion was the rookie of the year in Cuba in 2010-11, when he had a 3.36 ERA in 101 2/3 innings for Industriales that ranked 11th in the league, though he did it with just 53 strikeouts and 43 walks. After defecting in June 2011 at the World Port Tournament in the Netherlands (he didn't pitch there), Concepcion worked out for teams in the Dominican Republic, where he showed an 86-90 mph fastball that occasionally ran up to 92. The 6-foot-2, 180-pound lefty had shown good feel for pitching for his age in Cuba, but any command he had disappeared in the Midwest League and scouts' concerns about his inability to miss bats proved accurate. His curveball has good depth at times but it gets loopy, and because he throws slightly across his body, some scouts think that makes it hard for him to get out on his front side and deliver a consistent breaking ball. His changeup, which some scouts called a splitter, is a below-average pitch. While the Cubs typically signed several Cuban players every year prior to the arrival of Epstein and Hoyer, they didn't sign any other Cuban players after Concepcion besides Soler.

The Cubs also signed 32-year-old Japanese righthander Kyuji Fujikawa to a two-year deal worth $9.5 million, including a $1 million bonus, with a vesting option for 2015. Fujikawa, who signed as a free agent, was one of the top relievers in Nippon Professional Baseball over the past several seasons for Hanshin. He is Chicago's No. 9 prospect, with his full scouting report available here.

Juan Carlos Paniagua benefited twice from Major League Baseball ruling him ineligible to sign for one year, all without ever changing his date of birth. Paniagua signed with the Diamondbacks as Juan Carlos Collado for $17,000 in May 2009, then pitched in the Dominican Summer League in 2009 and part of the 2010 season on a pending contract. In 2010, MLB terminated his contract and declared him ineligible to sign for one year due to fraudulent paperwork.

While he was ineligible to sign, Paniagua's fastball rose from touching 92 mph to hitting 98 mph. He changed his name from Collado to Paniagua, kept the same date of birth (April 4, 1990), then signed with the Yankees for $1.1 million in 2011. MLB ended up terminating that contract as well for what it deemed to be falsified documents and declared him ineligible to sign for one year. When he was trying out for teams again, Paniagua sat at 93-95 mph and showed an improved slider. Once he became eligible to sign on July 19, he landed a $1.5 million bonus from the Cubs using the same name and same date of birth he used to sign with the Yankees. MLB ended up ruling that Paniagua's age was undetermined, the Cubs decided to proceed with the contract, he received his visa and he made two appearances in the Rookie-level Arizona League before joining short-season Boise for the playoffs. Since he signed after July 2, his bonus will count against the Cubs' 2012-13 international bonus pool. His bonus was the biggest of the year for a Dominican pitcher and the third-highest of any international amateur player signed since July 2.

Even though at 22 he's two weeks older (or maybe more) than Starlin Castro, Paniagua is still a talented prospect. At 6-foot-1, 195 pounds, Paniagua has long, slinging arm action and a fastball ranging from 93-98 mph. When he went to Boise, the Cubs saw him touch 100 mph on one pitch. His second-best pitch is his changeup, which has splitter-like action at times. He throws both a slider and a curveball, with the slider the more advanced of the two. His slider improved during his second MLB penalty, but he still has a tendency to overthrow it and get on the side of the ball at times. He needs to learn to harness his stuff, so his command and pitchability are behind where they should be for his age, which isn't surprising given his unique development path. He may end up in the bullpen, but mostly he needs to face professional hitters first for the Cubs to know more about what they have. After going to the Cubs' Dominican winter program, Paniagua will probably head to low Class A Kane County to open the year, although high Class A Daytona could be a possibility.

Chicago's biggest signing among players who became eligible to sign last year on July 2 was Dominican shortstop Frandy de la Rosa (video), who trained with Valentin Monero and signed for $700,000. De la Rosa, who is from Santo Domingo and turned 17 in January, is 6-foot-1, 170 pounds with a short, simple swing from both sides of the plate. He has quick hands, good bat control and a knack for putting the barrel to the ball, with more line drives than power right now. He stood out among Cubs position players at the team's Dominican instructional league, even with more advanced players like Marco Hernandez in attendance.

De la Rosa doesn't have a ton of tools, as his below-average speed and arm strength had even scouts who liked him projecting him as an offensive-oriented second baseman. He did show signs of improvement with his arm and hands as July 2 approached, then continued to get better defensively and show a stronger arm during the Cubs' winter program.

Ciro Barrios has signed several players with the Cubs out of his Venezuelan program, including Mark Malave, Carlos Rodriguez, Angel Mejias and Willson Contreras, among others. The Cubs went back to Barrios for two more players in December, giving $185,000 to shortstop Danny Gutierrez and $170,000 to righthander Ramon Valera. Gutierrez, 17, signed as a shortstop but has been playing second base and the outfield. He stood out for his hitting, with a quick bat, good balance and a knack for putting the barrel to the ball with good extension through the zone. His bat is ahead of his glove, with an arm that fits better at second base than shortstop. Valera, 18, throws from an unconventional low three-quarters arm slot that borders on sidearm with a fastball and slider that both grade out as fringe-average pitches.

Dominican righthander Wagner Disla trained with Victor Baez and signed for $100,000 in August. Disla, 17, seemed to tire as July 2 approached, but at 6-foot-4, 180 pounds there's plenty of projection left on his 85-89 mph fastball with his size and the way his arm works. He shows good feel for his breaking ball, which may be his best pitch.

Due to their lack of pitching prospects, the Cubs have spent the past year targeting young pitchers. They added Dominican righthander Luis Hernandez for $80,000 in August. Hernandez, who turned 18 last month, is 6-foot-5, 210 pounds with a fastball up to 91 mph and some feel for his secondary pitches, giving him a chance to be a starter. Oscar de la Cruz, 17, is a 6-foot-4, 200-pound converted shortstop from the Dominican Republic who hasn't been pitching long, but his arm works cleanly and he's hit 91-92 mph after signing for $85,000 in October. Dominican lefthander Jose Morel, an $80,000 signing in August, is starting to fill out his projectable frame (6-foot-6, 205 pounds). Morel, 18, has been up to 89 mph with feel for a curveball and a changeup that he just started throwing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 22, 2013, 01:33:38 pm
While the Cubs typically signed several Cuban players every year prior to the arrival of Epstein and Hoyer.....

Really?

Who were the several Cuban players signed each year under Hendry?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 22, 2013, 03:46:36 pm
I believe that Silva and Cabaza were signed under Hendry.  And I believe we had discussions at that time about the fact that the Cubs signed a lot of Cuban players, but none of the top ones.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 22, 2013, 10:19:19 pm
2011:
LHP Frank Del Valle, Cuba - age 21 - $800,000 bonus
OF Yasiel Balaguert, Cuba - age 19 - $400,000 bonus
RHP Carlos Martinez, Cuba - age 20 - $250,000 bonus

2010:
OF Rubi Silva, Cuba - $1 million bonus
C Yaniel Cabeza, Cuba - $500,000 bonus
RHP Juan Yasser Serrano, Cuba - $250,000 bonus
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 22, 2013, 10:22:08 pm
JR, thanks a ton for that info on the internationals.  Getting even a little scouting info and knowledge about which guys got some money if very helpful. 

Very interesting.  Hopefully we get some real success from one or more of the non-Paniagua's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 23, 2013, 08:23:33 am
2011:
LHP Frank Del Valle, Cuba - age 21 - $800,000 bonus
OF Yasiel Balaguert, Cuba - age 19 - $400,000 bonus
RHP Carlos Martinez, Cuba - age 20 - $250,000 bonus

2010:
OF Rubi Silva, Cuba - $1 million bonus
C Yaniel Cabeza, Cuba - $500,000 bonus
RHP Juan Yasser Serrano, Cuba - $250,000 bonus

How easy it has been to forget....  Hopefully a couple will still come around to be a bit more memorable in the future.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 23, 2013, 09:35:31 am
..Ciro Barrios has signed several players with the Cubs out of his Venezuelan program, including Mark Malave, Carlos Rodriguez, Angel Mejias and Willson Contreras, among others. The Cubs went back to Barrios for two more players in December, giving $185,000 to shortstop Danny Gutierrez and $170,000 to righthander Ramon Valera. Gutierrez, 17, signed as a shortstop but has been playing second base and the outfield. He stood out for his hitting, with a quick bat, good balance and a knack for putting the barrel to the ball with good extension through the zone. His bat is ahead of his glove, with an arm that fits better at second base than shortstop. Valera, 18, throws from an unconventional low three-quarters arm slot that borders on sidearm with a fastball and slider that both grade out as fringe-average pitches.

Dominican righthander Wagner Disla trained with Victor Baez and signed for $100,000 in August. Disla, 17, seemed to tire as July 2 approached, but at 6-foot-4, 180 pounds there's plenty of projection left on his 85-89 mph fastball with his size and the way his arm works. He shows good feel for his breaking ball, which may be his best pitch.


Due to their lack of pitching prospects, the Cubs have spent the past year targeting young pitchers. They added Dominican righthander Luis Hernandez for $80,000 in August. Hernandez, who turned 18 last month, is 6-foot-5, 210 pounds with a fastball up to 91 mph and some feel for his secondary pitches, giving him a chance to be a starter. Oscar de la Cruz, 17, is a 6-foot-4, 200-pound converted shortstop from the Dominican Republic who hasn't been pitching long, but his arm works cleanly and he's hit 91-92 mph after signing for $85,000 in October. Dominican lefthander Jose Morel, an $80,000 signing in August, is starting to fill out his projectable frame (6-foot-6, 205 pounds). Morel, 18, has been up to 89 mph with feel for a curveball and a changeup that he just started throwing.

Craig JR  International Signings Venezuela Dominican (I'm putting in some key words I'll remember if I want to search back in June when I can't remember which DSL guys scouted well enough to get any money.) 

Funny how the brief scouting synopses don't always seem to match the dollars.  The 6'4" converted SS de la Cruz with a clean, fast delivery and lots of projection sounds much more interesting than the 18-year-old Valera with the low, almost side-arm slot and "fringy" fastball and offspeed.  But Valera got double the dollars $170 to de la Cruz's $85. 

Regardless, they all sound interesting.  With pitchers who are 6'4", 6'4", 6'5", and 6'6", and 17 or 18, it's easy to imagine any of them maturing into serious velocity.  Possibilities are relatively unbounded with such young and projectable arms.  Hopefully good scouting, good coaching, good work habits, good health, and good luck all work together for one or more of these guys. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 23, 2013, 09:36:44 am
With the cap, I wonder if the competition had really thinned out by October or December?  If nobody has any money left, maybe de la Cruz could have gotten $200 in July but there just aren't many bidders left?  Or, perhaps vice versa, a bunch of teams end up getting outbid on guys during the summer, and still have money left, so it takes $170-185 to get Venezuelans that aren't any better than $100 guys in July. 

With the Cubs moving a team to Venezuela, it seems they are trying to push to raise their Venezuelan presence. May well be that they are consciously and willingly overpaying a bit to get some Venezuelans as part of that process? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on February 23, 2013, 10:38:50 am
Craig - stay on Curt's good side.  He has the power to change your keywords.

If you are trying to generate local interest in the Venezuelan League, it makes sense to try to fill it with local kids when possible.  Also, they might be trying to establish themselves as the leader in Venezuelan signings.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on February 23, 2013, 10:53:33 am
I thought I read somewhere that Venezuela is less heavily scouted than the Dominican due to safety concerns, or it might have just been why they're aren't a bunch of Venezuelan teams.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 23, 2013, 11:14:51 am
Craig - stay on Curt's good side.  He has the power to change your keywords.

If you are trying to generate local interest in the Venezuelan League, it makes sense to try to fill it with local kids when possible.  Also, they might be trying to establish themselves as the leader in Venezuelan signings.
Yes.  Everybody is under the cap.  So I don't think you can just outspend the competition; there's likely to be a lot of closely comparable bids, "ties", in terms of offers.  if you can somehow set yourself above the competition such that you win a lot of the ties, that's where you'd like to be.  Facilities, the quality of your recruiters, the quality of your actual development program, proximity, I think all of those can help.  It would be nice if the Cubs could have such a strong and positive presence that agents and players would default to us, dollars being equal. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on February 23, 2013, 06:53:03 pm
Quote
RHP | Tony Zych    Born: 8/7/90 in Crete, Ill.     
It’s max arm, max effort for Zych, the former University of Louisville closer who has been on the fast track to Chicago. He throws a mid-90s fastball with a hard slider, and has a short, deceptive delivery that features some ugly recoil. Still, he isn’t an extreme strikeout pitcher—merely a good one who uses his slider as more of a complementary offering. McLeod envisions Zych’s fastball as one that will run in on hands and stay off barrels. Both his velocity and mound makeup profile for the late innings. Though he’s just two years out of college, that future could come as soon as 2013.


Vineline.  Mid 90's in a scouting report doesn't seem that great, which RH pitcher doesn't supposedly reach mid-90's?  But doing it routinely, and doing it with deception and run/movement, could make it pretty useful.  A little control would also help....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on February 23, 2013, 10:45:51 pm
The words in that Tony Zych report that scare me the most are "ugly recoil."

I never like to see any pitcher that has recoil, even a short reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on February 24, 2013, 07:46:15 am
Anyone have a video?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on February 24, 2013, 05:14:06 pm
Zych from last year's ST:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOQlstlhUCw


From his last year in college:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdhXjf84Axo


And from the 2010 Cape Cod League:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNasXXdr4eI
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on February 24, 2013, 05:43:43 pm
Wow.  Thanks, Chris.  That doesn't look so much like a recoil but a total failure to bend the knee, bow the back, and follow through.  No wonder his control is spotty.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 24, 2013, 07:18:01 pm
Lots of wasted energy in that stoop for the signal, though I suppose for a reliever it doesn't matter much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on February 25, 2013, 03:00:02 pm
Ken Rosenthal piece on Soler below.   Makes you wonder if maybe Soler is actually Cubs #1 prospect, as new Trib beat writer said the other day.

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-hope-future-is-bright-with-likes-of-jorge-soler-022513
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on February 25, 2013, 06:37:33 pm
He certainly should be ranked ahead of Almora, and always should have been.  Baez is a judgment call.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on February 25, 2013, 07:56:56 pm
I wouldn't put him ahead of Baez. Even if he outgrows SS, he's a 2B or 3B. Lots more positional value for Baez right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 25, 2013, 08:19:37 pm
Ken Rosenthal piece on Soler below.   Makes you wonder if maybe Soler is actually Cubs #1 prospect, as new Trib beat writer said the other day.

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chicago-cubs-hope-future-is-bright-with-likes-of-jorge-soler-022513

From that article --
(http://static.foxsports.com/content/fscom/img/2013/02/25/022513-MLB-Soler-Power-PI-AA_20130225105845249_660_320.JPG)

Those forearms are beastly.

I know Rosenthal was likely repeating the official front office line regarding Soler: "He will start the season at a higher level of A ball, and his ETA as a regular at Wrigley Field, if everything goes well, is probably no earlier than 2015."

I think there is a high probability he is getting regular playing time by the end of next year.

It appears likely he will start in Daytona, and if he does well, that would mean a mid-season promotion to Tennessee, allowing him to finish with AA this season.

Ah, isn't it nice to dream.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on February 25, 2013, 08:21:48 pm
The most likely scenario is that Soler totally washes out and is never seen at Wrigley except as a spectator.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on February 25, 2013, 08:31:01 pm
If the Cubs go into fire sale mode again at the trading deadline, we may be looking at an outfield of Soler, Jackson and Lake in August and September.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on February 25, 2013, 08:36:29 pm
140 losses?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on February 26, 2013, 09:51:39 am
If the Cubs go into fire sale mode again at the trading deadline, we may be looking at an outfield of Soler, Jackson and Lake in August and September.

Jackson, most likely, Lake wouldn't be surprising, but Soler would have to zip thru Daytona and then totally dominate in AA the second half of the season before Soler would likely get called up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on February 26, 2013, 02:16:55 pm
Daury Torrez made BA's Top 20 DSL/VSL prospects list.  Sounds like a nice $25,000 bargain.

Unfortunately it doesn't sound like our big bonus players like Mark Malave and Luis Acosta were that impressive.  Probably a good thing we decided to do some revamping of the international department after the season.

Quote
Daury Torrez, rhp, Cubs

Age: 18. B-T: R-R. Ht.: 6-3. Wt.: 200. Signed: Dominican Republic, 2010.

The Cubs had bonus babies like Venezuelan third baseman Mark Malave ($1.6 million) and shortstop Luis Acosta ($1.1 million in 2011) in the DSL last year, but both of them struggled. Lefthander Carlos Rodriguez and outfielders Jeffrey Baez and Roberto Caro had strong seasons, but the Cubs' best prospect in the DSL last year was Torrez, who signed for $25,000 when he was 17 in December 2010. In his second DSL season, Torrez ranked third in ERA and had the lowest walk rate in the league, with just four walks to the 280 batters he faced. Torrez, who is from Esparanza, isn't just a soft tosser. Torrez has a physical build and sits at 90-93 mph with good sink and run on his fastball. He commands all of his pitches, including a hard slider and a changeup that he has feel for, but he doesn't have a putaway pitch yet, which is why he didn't strike out more batters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 06, 2013, 08:50:03 am
http://www.csnchicago.com/blog/cubs-talk/cubs-szczur-hoping-speed-learning-curve (http://www.csnchicago.com/blog/cubs-talk/cubs-szczur-hoping-speed-learning-curve)

Szczur piece.  With some interesting scouting comments that I've not seen before. 

Quote
He’s 1-for-15 with seven strikeouts so far in the Cactus League, but the exposure and experience has been invaluable.

“He’s a young man that hasn’t played tons of baseball in his life,” manager Dale Sveum said. “He’s another kid where you can’t teach that hand strength. The ball comes off his bat like a major-league player. But there’s just adjustments that have to be made to understand what's all valued in his swing.

“His upper body wants to lift out of his swing, and that's why he chops balls to shortstop and third base. He’s got power. He can hit a ball actually a long way. That guy’s a really, really strong kid with major-league hands when he’s got a bat.”


The analysis that he's got a very flawed swing that needs to be restructured is helpful, seems to jive with Keith Law's analysis that he's got a lousy stroke, and gives me a bit of the Jackson feel.  But the bit about the major league hands, and that he's really strong, is also rather encouraging. 


Two years ago, I think the Wilken/BA spin was that he was a good contact guy, that he had a knack for "barreling" the ball, or whatever.  That has not seemed true in reality, and doesn't fit with Sveum's note.  Two years ago he hit for average for a while at Peoria with no power, then he started hitting with at least some power but his contact/average faded.  Last year, he showed almost zero power, very much a singles guy.  So I'd wondered if he just didn't have the snap, and produced no power because perhaps he needed to sell out for power in order to get any. 


Trying to remake a swing is pretty tough.  Jackson, that was a huge project over the winter that Sveum and coaching and Jackson himself all seemed committed to.  Perhaps Szczur's issues aren't as bad, or maybe they are worse, who knows.  But it seems he perhaps really needed the same level of focused commitment that Jackson shared.  May be hard to be doing that during a pro season, and may be hard to get the drills in when you're sitting on a bus driving around the Southern league, or sitting in a hotel remote from a playing field.  But, hopefully whoever they have as his hitting coach in AA will have the time and the coaching ability and the interest to help him fix his problems. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 07, 2013, 07:08:03 am
http://www.thecubreporter.com/comment/210688#comment-210688 (http://www.thecubreporter.com/comment/210688#comment-210688)

Arizona Phil has a listing of minor-league pitching Iowa and Tennessee work groups.  These being the upper levels, most of the younger/newer/more exciting pitching prospects aren't listed.  (Although Pierce Johnson is with Iowa for now.)  Obviously guys all get shipped down a level or two.  Johnson obviously isn't going to start higher than Daytona.  The list is interesting to me for several reasons:
1.  It's just a reminder of who the names are, and of how many guys will be released before April. 
2.  There aren't a lot of thriller names.  Reminder of how thin the upper minors are for pitching.

3.  The most useful thing about an early list like this is to see who's injured.  Usually every spring their turn up guys who have issues, that I didn't know were injured.  Anybody in "limited activity only" is a problem.  Last year I don't think we knew that Maples was injured and would miss most of the season until one of these kinds of lists. 

So, some interestings on the injured list:
Dayan Diaz
Andrew McKirahan
Marcos Mateo
Lim (the late-30's Korean)
Marcello Carenno, the guy we got for Jeff Baker who had nice stats
Hunter Cervanka, the inconsistent lefty we got for Marlon Byrn
Brett Wallach.  (The Ted Lilly trade guy.  I'd just assumed he'd been released.)

Rosario wasn't listed at all.  That probably confirms that he's injured, since pretty much anybody who was in Peoria last spring is with AA/AAA on this list. 

Thoughts:
1.  That's not really all that many injured guys.  I'd have loved to see Rosario healthy, but there are always pitchers with problems.  I'd say that's not too bad.

2.  Also noteworthy are guys who are NOT listed as limited.   BEN WELLS.  Kyle Hendricks.  David cales.  Carlos Gutierrez, former first-round pick by Twins that had shoulder surgery only last July.   The latter seems suspicious:  July shoulder arthroscopic cleanup and he's pitching already?   

3.  Interesting that several of the guys picked up in trade are included.
4.  One other interesting thing, read next post. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 07, 2013, 07:18:12 am
http://www.thecubreporter.com/comment/210688#comment-210688 (http://www.thecubreporter.com/comment/210688#comment-210688)  Arizona Phil

Quote
RHP Armando Rivero (assigned to the Tennessee squad with fellow Cubans Gerardo Concepcion and Frank del Valle) ) is a Cuban defector the Cubs signed after he turned 23, so the international bonus limits do not apply. Rivero was the closer for Industriales de Habana in the Cuban major league (Serie Nacional) prior to defecting, and he also pitched for the Cuban National Team. 


I didn't recall this Cuban signing being reported. 


http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/03/cubs-sign-cuban-fireballer-armando-rivero/


John Arguello compiles some of the posted scouting reports on Rivero. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 08, 2013, 05:30:55 pm
From VineLine

The Cubs will look at trends to see if a hitter is making adjustments, reducing his strikeouts or getting into better counts. And they compare players to their league (controlling for age) more than they try to project a major league line.

Minor league numbers also play a role in evaluating how Cubs farmhands are developing. Director of Player Development Brandon Hyde and his crew of coaches and coordinators create “player plans,” a direct implementation of the newly codified Cubs Way. Every farmhand signs off on developmental goals, which list his strengths and weaknesses in the physical, fundamental and mental aspects of the game.

“We break it down into categories, and we have progress reports on goals and things we feel—and the player feels like—they need to do to get better,” Hyde said.

The team collects proprietary information in nightly game reports that include pitch-by-pitch data alongside coaches’ comments. It’s all aggregated and searchable by the front office like any other stats.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 12, 2013, 12:31:48 pm
Quote from: Arizona Phil
And FWIW, Dan Vogelbach is assigned to the Kane County squad, and has been taking grounders at 3rd base.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 12, 2013, 02:22:01 pm
Phil also reports that Maples is injured, he wasn't sure if it was elbow or shoulder. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on March 12, 2013, 04:41:49 pm
Wouldn't it be news that Maples *isn't* injured?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 12, 2013, 06:27:39 pm
Quote
Quote from: Arizona Phil

    And FWIW, Dan Vogelbach is assigned to the Kane County squad, and has been taking grounders at 3rd base.

Impossible.

Pundits here have already established the guy will have difficulty moving and fielding well enough to DH.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 12, 2013, 09:03:12 pm
False. No one here has made any such claim.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 13, 2013, 08:52:03 am
Phil also reports that Maples is injured, he wasn't sure if it was elbow or shoulder. 

Later in the day

Quote
Submitted by Arizona Phil
on Tue, 03/12/2013 - 8:50pm Permalink
Dillon Maples threw a bullpen session this morning and looked good. I doubt that he will be held back too much longer,
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 13, 2013, 09:14:50 am
One of these things is not like the other.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on March 13, 2013, 09:39:43 am
Perhaps Phil is referring to Maples' modeling career?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 13, 2013, 11:14:00 am
Quote
Later in the day
Quote  Submitted by Arizona Phil

Dillon Maples threw a bullpen session this morning and looked good. I doubt that he will be held back too much longer,


Thanks, Cactus.  That's very good news.  Would seem prohibitively unlikely that he'll open with Kane County.  Between being a raw wildman, perhaps needing mechanical adjustment, it being pretty April cold in the Midwest league, and arm issues last year and something or other setting him back this spring again, Kane makes no sense.  Staying in the warm, structured, teaching-intensive, and rehab-supportive environment of Mesa seems much safer and more sensible. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 13, 2013, 12:32:32 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7phlHG78do
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 13, 2013, 12:40:36 pm
That's a long, ugly post.

Perhaps you should re-read your original statement, and then re-submit.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 13, 2013, 12:48:38 pm
http://www.thecubreporter.com/03122013/2013-cubs-minor-league-camp-rosters-312

List of current work groups, and list of limited/disabled.  Quite a few guys have relocated to more sensible spots from the list a week ago.  As always, the "limited/rehab/inactive" list is most interesting.  And it's even shorter than the one last week, despite adding the A-ball guys.  Noteworthies are of course Maples, who's already been mentioned; Jose Rosario; and the new Cuban, Armando Rivero.  Phil also mentions that he hasn't seen Paniagua or Torreyes.  Visa problems, maybe?  Who knows. 

 LIMITED ACTIVITY/REHAB GROUP (10):
Marcelo Carreno, P (TENNESSEE)
* Hunter Cervenka, P (TENNESSEE
Dayan Diaz, P (TENNESSEE)
Chang-Yong Lim, P (IOWA)
* Alberto Mineo, C (KANE COUNTY)
Dillon Maples, P (KANE COUNTY)
Armando Rivero, P (TENNESSEE)
Jose Rosario, P (DAYTONA)
Casey Weathers, P (IOWA)
Brad Zapenas, INF (KANE COUNTY)

INACTIVE (4):
Carlos Escobar, C (ankle/foot injury)
Marcos Mateo, P (TJS rehab)
Amaury Paulino, P (TJS rehab)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 13, 2013, 05:28:12 pm
http://sbb.scout.com/2/1273745.html

Go to 32:30 minutes in, Kiley McDaniel has 17 minutes of interview with Tim Wilken.  A second half of the interview will be broadcast later. 

McDaniel obviously got the interview over a meal, so the restaurant music is playing and you can hear Wilken chewing and stuff like that.  Not a high-quality interview.  But interesting to hear Wilken talk.  He's kind of a slow-talking guy.  But he also sounds very relaxed, so it's interesting to listen to his comments. 

1.  He rationalized some of the struggles of the Cubs system, that 04-05 were void before he came in, and then he emphasizes the challenges they had thereafter.  Sound like they were pretty spending-constrained.  And with the free agency activity their second pick was often pretty late.   
2.  He's made reference to Lincecum before; sounded like he really wanted Lincecum in his first draft.  Lincecum went #10, Cubs took Colvin at #13, and I think I've heard that Detroit was pretty committed to Scherzer if possible.   
3.  Talks about #1 starters, and how very hard they are to get.  Picking a player is often smarter.
4.  Later, he does talk as if this draft will provide a good shot to get a true #1 starter.  The failure rate for high pitcher picks is well known.  But he sounded like going after a #1 starter was very much a possibility.   
5.  Refers to Pierce Johnson as a possible #2.   
6.  Says that Rickets didn't tell them till 45 minutes before the 2011 draft that they could go at it.   
7.  Super positive about the support that Ricketts has given.  His contrast between Ricketts era and previous era seemed pretty stark. 
8.  Talked as if they had Baez #1 going into that draft.   
9.  Very positive about Vogelbach as a hitter, viewed him as another #1 (first rounder, given context), said he could hit 25-30 HRs, doesn't punch out too much, is very determined, throws well, reads everything.  Suggested that he can catch what he can reach.  He said the big question was whether Vogelbach will have the first-two-steps quickness. 
10.  Optimistic about some of the projection picks from 2011 especially.  Who knows who he's got in mind.  Dunston?  Scott?  Marra?  Gretzky? Urban?  Jensen?   Who knows, but he seemed to think there was more than just the big names.  Seemed very optimistic about the upcoming future, and what things might look like from the 2011 class come 2016 or 2018. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 13, 2013, 07:24:48 pm
Jim Bowden's take on Cub prospects, FWIW.  It's a less than enthusiastic review on Baez and Soler.

Quote from: Jim Bowden
MESA, Ariz. -- It’s telling that the Chicago Cubs leapt 10 places in ESPN.com’s Future Power Rankings, jumping from 16th to sixth in only one season. Both the major-league club and farm system saw significant additions, but that won’t stop another last-place finish.

Most evaluators at the Cubs' big-league camp are praising the tools and bat speed of prospects Javier Baez, Junior Lake and Jorge Soler. Baez has ridiculous bat speed but also a late c ocking motion in his swing that has to be corrected as he heads up the development ladder. Lake has tremendous power but huge holes in the zone. Soler’s power and presence is reminiscent of Frank Thomas.

After watching their at-bats and batting practice, however, I think all three have some “hit” tool issues. Odds are one of them never pans out and follows Corey Patterson and Felix Pie as Cubs prospects who failed to live up to the fans’ often unrealistic expectations. The one prospect who does look like slam dunk isn’t even in big-league camp -- center fielder Albert Almora. He was the Cubs’ first-round selection in last year’s draft and looks like a future All-Star.

However, the Cubs' best prospect might not even be a player. Vice President of Player Development and Scouting Jason McLeod is one of the best evaluators in the sport. McLeod’s history of successful drafts in Boston, San Diego and now the Cubs make him one of the top GM prospects in the game of baseball.

In 2008, Seattle Mariners President Chuck Armstrong was doing his due diligence in looking for a new general manager. He called me and asked who I would recommend. I gave him two names at the time -- Mike Rizzo and Jack Zduriencik. I considered them two of the best evaluators in the sport, and they both possess the intelligence and blend of new- and old-school philosophies to succeed in the position. The next time I'm asked for a recommendation, I'm going to bring up McLeod. He’s intelligent, smart, intuitive, organized and articulate. The Cubs should value his judgment now while they still have him because he’s a rising star.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 13, 2013, 07:40:59 pm
Given Bowden's much heralded judgment from when he was a GM, this certainly should be taken very, very seriously.  Or maybe not.   ;)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 13, 2013, 08:26:27 pm
Quote
Quote from: Jim Bowden
....Most evaluators at the Cubs' big-league camp are praising the tools and bat speed of prospects Javier Baez, Junior Lake and Jorge Soler. .... Odds are one of them never pans out and follows Corey Patterson and Felix Pie as Cubs prospects who failed to live up to the fans’ often unrealistic expectations. The one prospect who does look like slam dunk isn’t even in big-league camp -- center fielder Albert Almora. He was the Cubs’ first-round selection in last year’s draft and looks like a future All-Star.


Ron, if only one out of Baez/Soler/Lake fails to pan out, as Bowden suggests, but two of those three do, plus slam dunk Almora, that would be super good. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 13, 2013, 08:36:11 pm

Ron, if only one out of Baez/Soler/Lake fails to pan out, as Bowden suggests, but two of those three do, plus slam dunk Almora, that would be super good. 

And really, is anyone counting on Lake panning out in the first place?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 13, 2013, 08:37:09 pm
Craig - I certainly don't disagree that would be "super good."

He also said, "After watching their at-bats and batting practice, however, I think all three have some “hit” tool issues."

Baez and Soler may have hit tool issues (whatever he means by that), but I doubt that he's a better judge of that than any number of others who have watched them (not only in batting practice, but also in games).  Sorry to be snarky about Bowden, but he strikes me as a kind of Phil Rogers of former baseball exec commentators.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 13, 2013, 08:46:17 pm
The most likely scenario is that the Cubs get one "average regular" and zero "superstars" out of their pool of supposed "top propsects".
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on March 13, 2013, 08:56:13 pm
The most likely scenario is that the Cubs get one "average regular" and zero "superstars" out of their pool of supposed "top propsects".

Excellent article on that....major, major drop off after top 40.  And, really after top 20.

http://www.royalsreview.com/2011/2/14/1992424/success-and-failure-rates-of-top-mlb-prospects

If we have a couple of guys in top 20, I feel good about 1 of them becoming an all star.  some of the position success rates surprised me too...didn't expect catcher to be so high.  Could see Shortstop and Outfielders being near the bottom, however, as it seems there are generally a ton of toolsy, raw guys among their number.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Santo4HofF on March 13, 2013, 09:47:28 pm
I listen quite often to Bowden on XM radio. He really sucks up to the Dodgers. It is sickening. If the Dodgers GM is ever struck and killed by a hit and run driver, send out a forensic team to check out Jim Bowden's vehichles!


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on March 14, 2013, 04:25:59 am
John Sickels' top 150 prospects:

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2013/3/13/4095252/minor-league-ball-top-150-prospects-for-2013-john-sickels
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 14, 2013, 10:35:29 pm
Albert Almora just tweeted that he broke his hamate bone today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 14, 2013, 10:46:09 pm
Almora is ruined by injury, Baez goes Patterson, Soler becomes Glenallen Hill, and Epstein commits suicide.

Book it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 14, 2013, 11:05:00 pm
Albert Almora just tweeted that he broke his hamate bone today.

Look at the bright side, that thins out the prospect congestion in the OF.... speaking of which, what has happened to Reggie Golden?

Is he in the minor league camp?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on March 15, 2013, 02:41:50 am
Quote
Almora announced the news on his personal Twitter account late Thursday night: “Not a good day! Broke my Hamate bone!” A Cubs official confirmed the injury – which is fairly common in baseball – happened during a swing that day.

Almora will need minor surgery that will likely sideline him for three or four weeks. At the moment, the Cubs expect him to be playing in games by late May.


http://www.csnchicago.com/blog/cubs-talk/cubs-elite-prospect-albert-almora-breaks-hamate-bone
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 15, 2013, 08:08:37 am
False. No one here has made any such claim.

And when it is shown that folks have essentially made that claim, you simply scrub the post which shows it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 15, 2013, 09:14:20 am
Like I said...re-read your post...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 15, 2013, 09:21:02 am
I realize you're a bit slow at times, so I'll help...

Quote
Impossible.

Pundits here have already established the guy will have difficulty moving and fielding well enough to DH.

No one here has ever claimed that Vogelbach will have difficulty doing anything well enough to DH.

Admit your mistake and move on...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 15, 2013, 09:39:42 am
There was no mistake, but I had moved on.  You responded to my post, as did JR, and I had moved on, responding no further..... you, on the other hand (or another administrator), apparently felt a need to remove my post responding to your "False. No one here has made any such claim."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 15, 2013, 09:51:29 am
I removed it because it was overly long and irrelevant. You were quoting claims which no one had ever argued. Par for the course, really...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 15, 2013, 09:52:55 am
And if you don't see the mistake in your post, I can't help you any further...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 15, 2013, 12:04:50 pm
Sun-Times scribe Gordon Wittenmeyer writes that the injury occurred while swinging a bat and Almora will get surgery on this injury.
...he broke the hamate bone, pre­sumably in his left hand. It’s a fairly common injury in hitters’ bottom hand. Almora broke the bone swinging a bat and will require minor surgery. The Cubs said he will need three-to-four weeks before resuming baseball activity. Almora is projected to open the season at Class A Kane County, and he’ll begin on the disabled list. He should return to game action in late May.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on March 15, 2013, 12:53:58 pm
I wonder if they'll consider removing the hamate bone in order to keep the injury from becoming a recurring one in the future for Almora.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on March 15, 2013, 11:42:16 pm
Quote from: Bruce Miles' blog
--Center-field prospect Albert Almora, the Cubs’ top pick in last year’s draft, broke the hamate bone in his left hand and likely will not play in a game until May (probably for the Kane County Cougars after some Arizona rehab). The bone doesn’t serve much purpose, so Almora is having the bone removed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 16, 2013, 10:39:57 am
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/Carpus.png)

Everything here is according to wikipedia.... with the hamate bone being the one labeled "H" in the image above.

The hamate bone has six surfaces:

    The superior, the apex of the wedge, is narrow, convex, smooth, and articulates with the lunate.

    The inferior articulates with the fourth and fifth metacarpal bones, by concave facets which are separated by a ridge.

    The dorsal is triangular and rough for ligamentous attachment.

    The volar presents, at its lower and ulnar side, a curved, hook-like process, the hamulus, directed forward and lateralward.

    The medial articulates with the triangular bone by an oblong facet, cut obliquely from above, downward and medialward.

    The lateral articulates with the capitate by its upper and posterior part, the remaining portion being rough, for the attachment of ligaments.

Clinical significance

This is the bone most commonly fractured when an amateur golfer hits the ground hard with a golf club on the downswing. The fracture is usually a hairline fracture, commonly missed on normal X-Rays. Symptoms are pain aggravated by gripping, tenderness over the hamate and symptoms of irritation of the ulnar nerve. This is characterized by numbness and weakness of the pinky finger with partial involvement of the ring finger as well, the "ulnar 1½ fingers."

It is also a common injury in baseball players. Several professional baseball players have had the bone removed during the course of their careers.[1][2][3][4][5] This condition has been called "Wilson's Wrist".[6]

The calcification of the hamate bone is seen on X-rays during puberty and is sometimes used in orthodontics to determine if an adolescent patient is suitable for orthognathic intervention (i.e. before or at their growth spurt).
Notable cases

    Jose Canseco, Oakland Athletics outfielder (1989)
    Ken Griffey, Jr., Seattle Mariners outfielder (1996)
    Jim Thome, Cleveland Indians first baseman (1996)
    Eric Hinske, Atlanta Braves first baseman (2003)
    Ryan Kalish, Boston Red Sox outfielder (2007)
    Dustin Pedroia, Boston Red Sox second baseman (2007)[7]
    Troy Tulowitzki, Colorado Rockies shortstop (2010)
    Domonic Brown, Philadelphia Phillies outfielder (2011)
    Pablo Sandoval, San Francisco Giants third baseman (2011, right; 2012, left)[8]
    Nick Markakis, Baltimore Orioles outfielder (2012)[9]

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 16, 2013, 03:28:00 pm
Baez just hit his third consecutive home run.  On the last three pitches he has seen
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on March 16, 2013, 03:31:26 pm
He hit the HR off the end of the bat.  Some serious bat speed and power.  Soler just missed an opposite field HR.  I think we are going to have fun watching these kids in the next 2 years or so.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on March 16, 2013, 03:32:43 pm
Yes, the Cubs should be the kings of ST for the next few years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 16, 2013, 04:21:00 pm

From some guy apparently summarizing some comments by Theo, presumably on the TV broadcast. 

Quote
Epstein talking:
- Cubs use proprietary software to improve the neural connections that help select which pitches to swing at. Along those lines at least...
- Selective aggressiveness
- Says its more nature than nurture
- Talks about how it might be nature but certainly it can be improved within the margins. Love this margin talk.
- Don't want to change the approach too much but rather the thought process situationally.
- Says this isn't new.
- Extend peaks by teaching them young while they still are at their peak physically.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 17, 2013, 07:25:04 am
Quote
Released: RHP Hung-Wen Chen, RHP Arturo Maltos-Garcia, RHP Austin Urban, RHP Tony York, LHP Kyle Shepard
Optioned to Triple-A: RHP Alberto Cabrera, RHP Trey McNutt, LHP Brooks Raley, 2B Logan Watkins
Optioned to Double-A: RHP Robert Whitenack
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 17, 2013, 08:23:01 am
Austin Urban is a little surprise.  A month ago there was still speculation that this would be his break out year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 17, 2013, 10:32:50 am
Austin Urban is a little surprise.  A month ago there was still speculation that this would be his break out year.

It may be.  This could well be the year that he breaks out of baseball entirely.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on March 17, 2013, 02:12:53 pm
So, anyhow, Cubs Den has a pictorial essay on Javy Baez's homerun swing. That's not absurd and unhealthy, right? Then again, i looked at it. Twice. And made my kid look at it.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/03/cubs-preview-and-thread-frame-by-frame-breakdown-and-analysis-of-javier-baezs-swing/#
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on March 18, 2013, 01:03:36 pm
Armando Rivero signing is official.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2013/03/cubs-sign-armando-rivero-for-3-1-million-bonus/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on March 18, 2013, 01:25:09 pm
Soler comments:

Soler said he’s learned a lot about hitting, most importantly the need to be patient at the plate.

“I’ve never seen this kind of pitching before,” he said. “It used to be when I played, 3-0 fastball, 2-0 fastball, and now it’s different. Now 3-0 changeup for a strike, 2-0 slider for a strike. The pitchers have more command of every single pitch.”

He’s still hopeful to make the Cubs next year but there’s a lot of adjustments to be made. Baez has helped Soler with some English.

Veteran Alfonso Soriano delivered some advice, too.

“Soriano told me no matter what kind of money you get, what kind of money your signing bonus is, you have to work hard every single day, and when you go down the Minor Leagues, you have to be a good example for the Minor Leaguers,” Soler said through interpreter, Franklin Fon
t.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 18, 2013, 01:28:43 pm
A good chunk of Soriano's salary might be worth it due to the example he can set for guys like Soler and Baez.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on March 18, 2013, 01:35:30 pm
A good thing that Cubs are investing in the Cuban market, even if some of these guys don't pan out.

Before too long, the Castro brothers will pass and maybe even non-defectors will come on to the MLB market.  Depending on if and when there is an international draft, the organizations that have a historical presence in the area might have a leg up. 

Wonder if Theo has an international affairs expert on staff.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 18, 2013, 01:40:51 pm
Quote
Wonder if Theo has an international affairs expert on staff.

Well if not, Sen. George Mitchell is speaking at Vanderbilt tonight.  I'll try to ask him if he'd be willing to volunteer for the role.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 18, 2013, 02:04:02 pm
A good chunk of Soriano's salary might be worth it due to the example he can set for guys like Soler and Baez.

Ironic statement, given the s-h-i-t Soriano used to get about his attitude from some here. Good for you, JR.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on March 18, 2013, 02:39:54 pm
I used to post about this in years past but the knock on Soriano by some was that he didn't run hard on the bases and on defense.  This drove some folks crazy--that he was lazy--and I understand that because who wants to see that?

I have always been convinced that Soriano had an understanding with prior management-after the leg problems--that he would not always run hard to protect his legs and would pick his spots when to hustle.  You can sort of understand that too, when he was a critical part of a contending team's offense. 

At least that's my theory.

The new guys came in and I don't think they went for that.  They wanted him to bear down and hustle on defense and ditto for running the bases.  And, I suspect that Soriano got into some bad habits regulating his own hustle efforts.

So, now it's all turned out for the better.  I don't recall anybody ever arguing (at least those that I don't have on ignore) that Soriano was ever a clubhouse problem or not a good teammate.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 18, 2013, 02:40:27 pm
Armando Rivero signing is official.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2013/03/cubs-sign-armando-rivero-for-3-1-million-bonus/

The guy is 25, has no real secondary pitch, had an ERA of 3.08 in his last year of Cuban ball, a fastball in the low 90's, and with no bonus signing limits at all, ended up with a signing bonus of $3M.

Doesn't sound likely to make much difference, if he ever does reach the majors.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 18, 2013, 03:01:35 pm
I don't recall anybody ever arguing (at least those that I don't have on ignore) that Soriano was ever a clubhouse problem or not a good teammate.   

My memory is different.  For some time there were complaints that he had a selfish player with a me-first attitude.  His reluctance to shift to LF after the trade to the Nats was cited, and his supposed failure to hustle and play hard were as well.  Those have gradually disappeared over the years, but it's really only been in the last couple of years when he has gotten such praise from teammates and management alike for his commitment and leadership, that they've pretty much disappeared.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 18, 2013, 03:02:14 pm
...the knock on Soriano by some was that he didn't run hard on the bases and on defense.  ......  I don't recall anybody ever arguing (at least those that I don't have on ignore) that Soriano was ever a clubhouse problem or not a good teammate.   

Agree.  He didn't run hard very often, out of the box, on the bases, or in the field.  So it had the look of a guy who was dogging it and wasn't trying very hard.  That was the primary complaint.  I'm not sure I recall people arguing that he was a bad chemist.  I think the hopping in the outfield was also blended by some posters into the negative paradigm.  And some posters thought the don't-run don't-hustle thing was a bad example. 

Before the Cubs signed him, I do recall there were some concerns about his clubhouse presence based on the story where Frank Robinson sent him to outfield and he wouldn't go for a day or two.   Edit:  As Ron already said!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 18, 2013, 03:09:51 pm
Armando Rivero signing is official.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/2013/03/cubs-sign-armando-rivero-for-3-1-million-bonus/

$3.1, that's nice to know.  Heh, compared to Concepcion it's half the money, he's RH not lefty, and he's 5 years older.  So the chances of getting real value probably aren't great.  But, take you shots, and even if most miss maybe you'll hit on some of them.  Certainly the scouting profile, of a middle-reliever with average velocity, questionable control, questionable mechanics, and questionable offspeed stuff is not real exciting. 

Comes across as a guy who could benefit from a lot of coaching.  The hook, the arm slot, the concerns with the movement and control on the breaking ball, those all sound like long-term development issues that could use a few summers and some off-seasons to work out.  But at 25, you'd not expect even a 3-year developmental plan to get scheduled.  Hopefully he's a quick study. 

Seems possible that the Cubs scouted him or did so more recently than did Badler or his sources.  Of course, that was the hope with Concepcion too, and it's seemed the minority assessment by the Cubs did not prove vindicated.  Hopefully Rivera gets his visa stuff together fast enough so that he can start working on pitching.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on March 19, 2013, 05:50:15 am
Short video of Dan Vogelbach taking second on a single. Watch him run the bases. I'd suggest he's faster than half the Cubs roster.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JPeuK_9oQE
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 19, 2013, 08:23:33 am
Short video of Dan Vogelbach taking second on a single. Watch him run the bases. I'd suggest he's faster than half the Cubs roster.


Yeah, but that's just running the bases.

There is no way that guy could possibly play LF.

If he makes the majors, his future is limited to playing DH.

Callis and Keith Law know.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on March 20, 2013, 01:50:24 pm
Very lengthy but quite interesting BA article

Quote
We often talk in generalities when discussing minor league parks, focusing on the league in which a team plays. For example, we might say the California League is a hitter's league. Or the Florida State League favors pitchers. But to what extent are those statements true? Which parks in those leagues push the needle the farthest? Which parks are the exceptions?

To answer those questions and more, Baseball America gathered home and road data for all 120 full-season minor league teams dating back to 2010. Distinct patterns emerge over the course of three seasons—encompassing more than 200 home games and 200 road games for most teams—and differences in weather conditions and varying talent levels from year to year tend to even out.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/minors/season-preview/2013/2614870.html (http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/minors/season-preview/2013/2614870.html)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on March 20, 2013, 02:31:28 pm
Javier Baez homered in his first at-bat in minor league camp yesterday.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on March 24, 2013, 12:17:11 am
Sveum on Baez:  "The guy has to develop. I know he hit all the home runs and everything, but he’s still premeditated swinging."

I love that phrase--premeditated swinging.  You could sum up a 1/2 century of Cubs baseball with that phrase.

I suppose that the #1 all-time example probably was Dunston.  Sometimes he would take the first two pitches for balls and then you could bet your life that the next pitch he saw would be a "premeditated" swing.  Did not matter where the pitch was--Shawon was swinging.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 24, 2013, 10:44:02 am
You do have to admit that if Baez is in fact a premeditated swinger, that in spring training he appeared to be premeditating pretty well....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 24, 2013, 11:29:58 am
Sveum on Baez:  "The guy has to develop. I know he hit all the home runs and everything, but he’s still premeditated swinging."

I love that phrase--premeditated swinging.  You could sum up a 1/2 century of Cubs baseball with that phrase.

I suppose that the #1 all-time example probably was Dunston.  Sometimes he would take the first two pitches for balls and then you could bet your life that the next pitch he saw would be a "premeditated" swing.  Did not matter where the pitch was--Shawon was swinging.

I agree with you on Dunston, although guys like him and Soriano and even Sosa, especially in the early years were undisciplined hitters who could be suckered into going after the same pitch over and over.  I don't think that's premeditated.

Frankly I think the best hitters of all time were premeditated hitters.  How often have we heard, "I was looking for a fastball on the outside corner and I got it." ?  That's premeditated.  I think Vlad and Aaron and Rose...all were premeditated hitters.  The guys who get told early in their careers not to be premeditated and pick their pitches more carefully usually become...Dale Sveum.  "See that guy over there?  Robin Yount?  You're not him."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 24, 2013, 11:34:05 am
Sveum on Baez:  "The guy has to develop. I know he hit all the home runs and everything, but he’s still premeditated swinging."

I love that phrase--premeditated swinging.  You could sum up a 1/2 century of Cubs baseball with that phrase.

I suppose that the #1 all-time example probably was Dunston.  Sometimes he would take the first two pitches for balls and then you could bet your life that the next pitch he saw would be a "premeditated" swing.  Did not matter where the pitch was--Shawon was swinging.

I used to give ben a hard time for his repeated bemoaning the absence of an organizational philosophy and plan that would guide decision making.  He was right, of course.  And he was also right about the Cubs needing some really "smart" guys to put a philosophy/plan in place and execute it consistently.  This is just one more example of how the Theo Epstein regime, down through the manager and coaches is doing just that.  Even when Baez knocks the cover off the ball, his failure to exercise discipline and judgement is not overlooked in the least.  This sort of thing is going to make it considerably less painful to watch the Cubs struggle at the major league level this year and maybe next as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 24, 2013, 12:23:18 pm
I'm just not convinced, Ron.  I like the old philosophy of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."  Yes, I believe in the Cubs Way.  Yes, I think it should be implemented throughout the system, but when that rare talent comes along that it doesn't fit, you have got to have the guts and brains not to employ it.

For years we had guys ruined by lack of philosophy, like Dunston and Patterson and Pie; it would be truly ironic if we now had guys ruined because we were stupidly anal.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 24, 2013, 12:26:22 pm
I agree with you on Dunston, although guys like him and Soriano and even Sosa, especially in the early years were undisciplined hitters who could be suckered into going after the same pitch over and over.  I don't think that's premeditated.

Frankly I think the best hitters of all time were premeditated hitters.  How often have we heard, "I was looking for a fastball on the outside corner and I got it." ?  That's premeditated.  I think Vlad and Aaron and Rose...all were premeditated hitters.  The guys who get told early in their careers not to be premeditated and pick their pitches more carefully usually become...Dale Sveum.  "See that guy over there?  Robin Yount?  You're not him."

The difference was that when Aaron or Rose DIDN'T get the fastball, they didn't swing.  Most premeditated swingers swing regardless of the pitch or the location.

Vlad had a great career swing at bad pitches because he had the ability to hit them.  The vast majority of hitters MUST wait for a pitch in the zone, or they fail to hit it hard.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 24, 2013, 12:42:20 pm
We must have a different definition.  For me premeditated is, if he throws that pitch in that location, I'm going to kill it.  You see to interpret as I'm swinging no matter what.  To me that's undisciplined, not premeditated.

Anyhow, if THAT'S what you think he meant, I agree with you.  But I think he meant, I don't these guys swinging until they can identify the pitch, read the commissioner's signature, and gauge it's speed within 2 mph. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on March 24, 2013, 03:40:52 pm
.......But I think he meant, I don't these guys swinging until they can identify the pitch, read the commissioner's signature, and gauge it's speed within 2 mph. 

Baez has one walk this spring in 48 plate appearances (and 14 walks in 339 PA in his career so far).  So, among other factors, I think it's hard to interpret Sveum's reference to "premeditated swinging" as not swinging enough or being too fine before taking a swing.  Indeed, hard to watch Baez and come to the conclusion that he's shy about swinging the bat.

In any event, I agree that jumping on a good pitch to hit IS an exercise of plate discipline-if it's coupled with laying off not-so-good pitches to hit.  I think it's fair to say that plate discipline is not just taking pitches.  It's also having the discipline to attack a good pitch to hit. 

Williams and Gwynn used to talk about this all the time with each other.  For Williams, getting a good pitch to hit was a lot about maneuvering to hit with power and Williams thought that Gwynn could hit for more power if he focused his discipline more narrowly. 

For Gwynn, within his skill set, it was about getting a good pitch to hit--to get a hit.  He agreed with Williams that he could hit for more power but that his form of plate discipline was about taking advantage of pitches that he consistently could hit for base hits.  Gwynn hit .302 career in two-strike situations which is remarkable.  I don't know any hitter who has done that.  Miguel Cabrera is a career .230 with two strikes. Pujols and Boggs were about .260.

Whether it's Williams or Gwynn or some lesser mortal, plate discipline is about having an approach to each AB (and each pitch within an AB) and that is the opposite of "premeditated" swinging. 

I think Sveum wants Baez to have an approach suitable to his skill set and that Baez need to work that out in the minors.  Baez may still end up as a relatively modest walk guy (like Gwynn) but an advanced approach will help him reach his potential within his skill set.  I think that was what Sveum was talking about.

It's the Cubs Way!  The Earth has moved.  :o
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 24, 2013, 04:16:10 pm
I think I'm getting thrown by "premeditated."  I think of premeditated murder.  The intent to blow somebody way...not reflex, not predisposition to swing, but to think through exactly what you're going to do.

What you're saying up above, Reb, I can buy.  Over-eagerness and lack of selectivity, I think, would be better descriptors than "premeditated."
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 24, 2013, 04:23:18 pm
The "Cubs Way," as was discussed recently, emphasizes "selective aggressiveness,"as which is to say they want hitters (especially one like Baez) to attack pitches he thinks he can drive.  Or, to put it another way, what Reb said.
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 24, 2013, 04:25:49 pm
And, like I said, to me, selective aggressiveness IS premeditated.

Swinging at everything and anything is the opposite, and, that, pretty much, is where Baez is at the moment.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 24, 2013, 05:04:40 pm
I think a premeditated swing is one in which you decide to swing regardless of where the pitch is thrown.

In the case of Shawon Dunston, he would swing at pitches that were two feet outside and in the dirt.

Selectivity probably didn't play a strong role there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 24, 2013, 05:06:06 pm
Didn't mean to pile on, Curt. Had not seen your more recent reply before posting mine.  Agree that premeditated isn't the best choice of words.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 24, 2013, 05:55:45 pm
"Premeditated"  certainly seems to match what's seen for Baez.  When he guesses right, he can sometimes kill it.  When he guesses wrong, he can look bad, and he guesses wrong often enough to whiff a lot and walk almost never. 

I agree with Dave's point.  The great ones are able to check their swing when they don't get what they were looking for.  But you need to have enough pitch recognition to tell, and to not overcommit.   

Patterson was in the 'premeditated" class.  Coming up, he'd swing on pitch one.  Later, trying to be a leadoff, he'd sometimes decide to take pitch one, regardless of how it looked.  So he'd take a fastball, then he'd premeditate to swing, at a slider bouncing.  He just didn't have the talent to actually react correctly to a pitch in flight.   

I worry with Baez.  He seems to be a smart baseball guy.  If he had the skill to see pitches first and respond rightly, like really good hitters do, wouldn't he already be doing that?  I think that often when a guy is a premeditator, isn't it often because he doesn't have the talent to do otherwise, to see and respond?  So you guess, take your chances, and hope to kill it often enough when you guess right, and accept your losses when you guess wrong?  Have enough good killer hits on the good guesses to justify the bad ones? 

Hopefully he can both get a little better at his recognition, and learn to cut back on his swing enough; enough so that he can overcommit less often, and better defend himself more often when he doesn't get what he was looking for.  Including with two strikes.  But he can kill it when he guesses right, so he may be able to have a pretty solid career killing a lot of good guesses, enough to justify making a lot of bad guesses and taking no walks. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 24, 2013, 06:00:17 pm
I also wonder if he'll add any more power, physically.  Lots of guys do get stronger after his age, although he already seems well built and may have nothing more to add.  But perhaps if he got even stronger, he could cut back on his big swing and still have the strength to hit it over the wall. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 24, 2013, 06:01:59 pm
I'm sorry.  I'm hurt.  Very hurt.  I'm feeling yellow coming on.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 24, 2013, 06:30:44 pm
Quote
‏@keithlaw
A reminder that Tommy John surgery isn't a riskless procedure - Rob Whitenack is sitting 85-87 here in a minor league game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 25, 2013, 10:10:32 am
Quote
Chicago Cubs

Released: RHP Ryan Hartman, RHP Su-Min Jung

Wasn't Jung one of our bigger Korean signings a few years ago? 

For all of the money we've spent in Korea, it doesn't seem like we've always gotten really great bang for the buck from it.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 25, 2013, 10:14:14 am
Jung was a $500K bonus.

By the way, just found this link while trying to research Jung's bonus.  It details all of our major international bonuses the last few years.  This needs to be bookmarked somewhere.

http://www.northsidebaseball.com/~nsbb/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=61285&view=previous
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 25, 2013, 10:20:37 am
Quote
2010:

RHP Jin-Yeong Kim, South Korea - $850,000 bonus

2009:

Cubs: OF Kyung-Min Na, South Korea - $725,000 bonus
Cubs: OF D ong-Yub Kim, South Korea - $550,000 bonus
Cubs: RHP Tzu-An Wang, Taiwan - $300,000 bonus
Cubs: IF Pin-Chieh Chen, Taiwan - $300,000 bonus
Cubs: RHP Yao-Lin Wang, Taiwan - $300,000 bonus

2008:

SS Hak-Ju Lee, South Korea - $725,000 bonus
RHP Su-Min Jung, South Korea - $510,00 bonus
C/OF Jae-Hoon Ha, South Korea - $225,000 bonus



2007:

RHP Dae-Eun Rhee, South Korea - $525,000 bonus
RHP Hung-Wen Chen, Taiwan - $200,000 bonus

Just editing that last list for Asian signings.  Just not a whole lot of very successful signings on that list it appears to me.  Hak-Ju Lee is obviously the most successful, but it seems like his star has been dimming a little bit recently as well.  The rest of that list consists of C grade prospects or just plain outright failures.

Also looking over the NSBB link, we haven't signed anyone from Asia in a couple of years it appears, unless they're missing someone or I'm forgetting someone.  Perhaps the Cubs are starting to de-emphasize the Pacific Rim a little bit, since we haven't seemed to have a great deal of success there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 25, 2013, 01:08:50 pm
Nice point, JR.  Seems like they've completely backed out of Korea.  With the spending cap, probably especially so.  It's somewhat surprising how really bad most of those signings were.  A lot of dollar mistakes in the draft at least get to A-ball with some success.  But a lot of the Asian guys really were already shown as busts in short-season. 

Of course, some of our Latin spending hasn't been any better.  Spent a whole bunch in 2011, but Malava, Marcano, that all-K shortstop; Wilson contreras; and that big Zambrano-like pitcher, no sign of any life from any of them either. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 25, 2013, 01:40:08 pm
Quote
But a lot of the Asian guys really were already shown as busts in short-season. 

Yeah I was just looking at Jin-Young Kim's stats, for instance.  He was pitching in relief in Mesa this past season after getting bombed in Boise the year before.  I'm sure we were hoping for better than that for $850K or $1.2 million. 

If we're going to stay reasonably active in the Pacific Rim, we probably need a new set of eyes out there.  Steve Wilson just doesn't seem to be cutting it.  Paul Weaver was shifted to "international cross-checker and coordinator for the Pacific Rim" after being demoted from international scouting director during the scouting department shakeups.  I don't know how much involvement he had in our previous Asian signings or if he'll be doing a lot of Wilson's job now, but hopefully we'll be getting better results in Asia with the scouting shakeup if we decide to stay active out there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 25, 2013, 02:43:58 pm
Most of those drafted, fail.  In fact, most of those drafted and paid a million dollars or more signing bonus, fail.  I don't think we can expect a higher success rate from Korea or any other country.

That said, after at first seeming to hit a home run with the first Korean signed, Choi, things degenerated rapidly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on March 25, 2013, 10:47:12 pm
Craig quoted part of this, but the rest from Law in his article today pertaining to the cubs.

• The two Cubs arms of note on Sunday came in at opposite ends of the spectrum. Starling Peralta, who was selected by Arizona in the Rule 5 draft this winter but quickly returned to the Cubs, touched 97 and sat around 94 with an inconsistent slider, slurvy at 75 mph, but with real bite at 81 in on a left-handed hitter's hands. There's some effort there but I can see why a team would at least pay $25,000 -- per Rule 5 guidelines -- for an extra look. Robert Whitenack, however, looked awful in his comeback from 2010 Tommy John surgery, sitting 85-87, way below what he was pre-surgery. He's a cautionary tale for every one of us (myself included) who looks at that operation as risk-free. Most guys come all the way back, but maybe one in 10 don't.

• I didn't see most of the Cubs' main hitting prospects, even the lower-tier guys, but did catch a few swings from second baseman Gioskar Amaya. He showed a compact stroke and the ability, maybe even the tendency, to try to keep his hands inside the ball rather than getting around it to drive the ball to the gaps. Jeimer Candelario didn't play; Dan Vogelbach homered to deep right and struck out twice. Their recent Cuban signee, pitcher Armando Rivero, probably won't get into game action until mid-April, when he'll start in extended spring training.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 26, 2013, 07:21:57 am
The two Cubs arms of note on Sunday came in at opposite ends of the spectrum. Starling Peralta, who was selected by Arizona in the Rule 5 draft this winter but quickly returned to the Cubs, touched 97 and sat around 94 with an inconsistent slider, slurvy at 75 mph, but with real bite at 81 in on a left-handed hitter's hands. There's some effort there but I can see why a team would at least pay $25,000 -- per Rule 5 guidelines -- for an extra look. Robert Whitenack, however, looked awful in his comeback from 2010 Tommy John surgery, sitting 85-87, way below what he was pre-surgery. He's a cautionary tale for every one of us (myself included) who looks at that operation as risk-free. Most guys come all the way back, but maybe one in 10 don't.

I think one very fair criticism of the new regime so far is they haven't made very good Rule 5 protection choices.  Protecting Whitenack ahead of Peralta almost turned out to be a very bad decision.   

Also with the talk lately of why the Theocracy hasn't done more about 3B, not protecting Ryan Flaherty last year has also turned out to be a pretty shortsighted decision.  Granted Theo has already admitted that mistake, but that was a mistake a lot of us non-experts on the message board saw pretty clearly the moment it happened.

The Theocracy probably needs to start re-evaluating its decision making processes for the Rule 5.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 26, 2013, 07:49:57 am
Let's put the Flaherty thing in perspective.

He hit .216/.258/.359/.617 in the majors last year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 26, 2013, 08:07:54 am
Let's put the Flaherty thing in perspective.

He hit .216/.258/.359/.617 in the majors last year.

I'd agree with that, and it certainly isn't like Flaherty is any more distinguishable than the likes of Stewart or Valbuena.  And it's also a lot more likely Peralta turns out to be the second coming of Marcos Mateo instead of the second coming of Carlos Zambrano.

Still, the Orioles sound like they're going to be opening the season with Flaherty as their DH, and they still seem to like him.  It'd probably be better if he was still around for us instead of playing for the Orioles, at least. 

Yeah I know we're not exactly talking about premium players here, and I've even made the point often enough that the Rule 5 is pretty overrated.  Still, it's pretty fair to say the new regime has less than an A grade so far when it comes to Rule 5 roster decisions.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 26, 2013, 08:27:47 am
Still, the Orioles sound like they're going to be opening the season with Flaherty as their DH, and they still seem to like him.  It'd probably be better if he was still around for us instead of playing for the Orioles. 

And the Cubs sound like they're going to be opening the season with Valbuena as their third baseman, and they still seem to like him.

The vast majority of personnel moves in baseball are gambles.  It is a lot easier to evaluate gambles when using hindsight.

When Whitenack went down, he was probably the best pitching prospect the Cubs had.  Certainly the nearest to the majors.  A great many pitchers with TJ surgery come back 100 percent.  Keeping him around to find out made good sense. 

They gambled that no one would take and keep Peralta.  They were right.  He is still likely to fail.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 26, 2013, 08:50:55 am
Turn on MLB Network right now to see Dunston's hit off Romo (with dad in the Giants dugout clapping)...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 26, 2013, 09:00:57 am
The base hit was nice, but even better was the 400 ft bomb he hit to straightaway CF in his 1st AB, and the rocket foul he hit off Romo on an inside fastball in the 9th...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on March 26, 2013, 10:19:24 am
How far out is Whitenak from surgery?  I find it hard to believe that if he was throwing 85-87 last year that they would have put him on the 40 man roster.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 26, 2013, 10:26:27 am
He had surgery in the summer of 2011.  He was doing very poorly during 2012, but that is not unusual for that type of surgery.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 26, 2013, 10:53:06 am
Turn on MLB Network right now to see Dunston's hit off Romo (with dad in the Giants dugout clapping)...

It was also a really good AB all the way around.  Obviously cannot generalize from one at bat, but Dunston looked very good against an excellent major league pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 26, 2013, 11:50:50 am
Agreed...I was impressed...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 26, 2013, 12:03:26 pm
The base hit was nice, but even better was the 400 ft bomb he hit to straightaway CF in his 1st AB, and the rocket foul he hit off Romo on an inside fastball in the 9th...

Turn on MLB Network right now to see Dunston's hit off Romo (with dad in the Giants dugout clapping)...

When was this game?  Earlier this spring, or last night, or something?  I went back to look at yesterday's box score, and I didn't see Dunston in the box score. 

It would be pretty awesome if Dunston turned into a big-league hitter with big-league power. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 26, 2013, 12:04:34 pm
It was yesterday's game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 26, 2013, 12:08:59 pm
Thanks!  I hadn't scrolled all the way to the bottom of the box score, there he was.  Heh, and I'd thought when Dave mentioned a 400 foot bomb, I looked in the HR list, and didn't see him there either.  Go Shawon. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 26, 2013, 12:20:24 pm
The 400 foot bomb was caught against the CF wall.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 26, 2013, 12:26:40 pm
Yep, CF was 410. Still crushed...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on March 27, 2013, 04:26:11 am
Az Phil:


Quote
As far as I can determine, the following players were released last weekend:

INF Dustin Harrington, RHP Ty'Relle Harris, 1B Paul Hoilman, RHP Jay Jackson, and OF Nelson Perez

These five have disappeared and probably were released:

RHP Jason Berken, OF Eliecer Bonne, RHP Carlos Martinez, LHP Matt Spencer, and RHP Scott Weismann
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 27, 2013, 06:27:59 am
Thanks, Chris.  Hoilman was supposed to be very smart pre-med student.  Probably a good time to move on for him.  Jackson obviously the formerly biggest name there.  Carlos Martinez, is he the big Cuban that Rodgers liked, and that started out with some very strong numbers for a while? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 27, 2013, 08:46:42 am
Hoilman made Brett Jackson look like a contact hitter.  But I am disappointed with Jackson.  He really looked good for a while.  Corey indicated that he did not take coaching very will, and I don't think the current administration will tolerate that very long.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 27, 2013, 09:14:39 am
Speaking of jiggy...for those of you who havent heard, he got married again a few weeks ago. The new missus obviously keeps him on a short leash, since he's never around anymore...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 27, 2013, 09:57:39 am
No more Johnson reports?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 27, 2013, 10:18:44 am
Insert your own "short leash" joke here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on March 27, 2013, 10:21:09 am
Jiggy is married again?  I know he is a man of deep convictions that are easily reversed on baseball matters, but does this carry over into his relationships as well?

Unless I'm mistaken he's still in his 20s, right?  Is he going for some kind of record? 




Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on March 27, 2013, 11:01:52 am
On second thought, he may have never married the first girl (his little girl's mom)...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 27, 2013, 11:17:17 pm
Quote:
Quote
Epstein said first baseman Daniel Vogelbach "has a really special bat and I think he's going to have a huge year." He also mentioned a "deep group" of infielders, naming third baseman Jeimer Candelario, second baseman Gioskar Amaya, and shortstops Marco Hernandez and Carlos Penalver.

"They are a long ways away, but of that group, one or two is going to take a step forward and join the group of potential impact guys," he said. "(Starter) Pierce Johnson is off to a really good start in his first full spring training, and (right-hander) Paul Blackburn, a high school kid.

"Those guys are a long ways away, and they really haven't proven themselves yet. But Branch Rickey's idea in creating a farm system was creating quality through quantity, and that's what we're trying to do — add as many talented guys as we can, knowing some of them will emerge. And then with the No. 2 overall pick, and a chance to do some damage internationally — we hope to add some more impact guys this year."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/ba ... 8950.story (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/ct-spt-0326-cubs-spring-training-chicago-20130326,0,4838950.story)


Nice to see Penalver being viewed as worthy of comment.  And to see continuing positive comments on Amaya. 


Perhaps most encouraging to me is Blackburn getting some positives. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 28, 2013, 02:23:27 pm
Cubs’ Shortstop Saunders Opens Eyes

MESA, Ariz.–Timothy Saunders didn’t open many eyes as an All-American at Division-III Marietta (Ga.), a school with a 90-acre campus and a 178-year history. But since being drafted by the Cubs, he has shown that all he needed was a shot on a bigger stage.

While the Cubs’ organization is loaded with young shortstops—from Starlin Castro down to 17-year-old Frandy de la Rosa, with Javier Baez, Arismendy Alcantara and Marco Hernandez in between—the 32nd-round pick has quickly forced his way into the equation.

Saunders, 22, batted .441 for Marietta last season, scoring 80 runs in 54 games, and has never stopped hitting. He hit.381/.431/.536 in 194 at-bats between Rookie-level Arizona League, low Class A Peoria and high Class A Daytona with five home runs, 33 RBIs and 17 stolen bases in 20 attempts.

Pretty impressive for a guy who wasn’t drafted as a junior and stayed on the board for almost 1,000 picks after his senior season.

“Just on his athleticism and actions, he should’ve been drafted much higher,” Cubs senior vice president scouting/player development Jason McLeod said. “I think the start to his career is legit. He’ll be tested this year to see what he can do over a full season.”

The right-handed-hitting Saunders and the switch-hitting Hernandez will likely split time at shortstop with Chicago’s new low Class A Kane County affiliate. He’ll also likely see time at second base—that’s where he was playing on the Cubs’ trip to Las Vegas on March 17. Replacing Darwin Barney late in a game against the Rangers, he homered off Triple-A righthander Ryan Feierabend.

“He’s a very athletic guy who simply went under the radar going into the draft last year—and that includes us,” McLeod said. “Sometimes those (Division III) schools can get overlooked due to the competition level.’’

There’s no overlooking Saunders now.

CUBBY HOLE

• The Cubs declined the Diamondbacks’ efforts to work out a deal to keep Rule 5 pick Starlin Peralta, spending $25,000 to get him back when Arizona concluded they couldn’t carry him on the big league roster. Arizona manager Kirk Gibson praised Peralta’s arm and attitude, saying “it’s quite possible that over time he’ll develop into a nice pitcher.”

• Among the non-drafted college players signed by the Cubs last year were Texas A&M-Corpus Christi outfielder Bobby Buckner, the son of Boise hitting coach Bill Buckner, and Chicago State outfielder William Hill, the grandson of Hall of Famer Billy Williams.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: dallen7908 on March 30, 2013, 10:06:27 am
If he was really opening eyes, would he be spending his year-23 season (he turns 23 in early May) in low-A?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 30, 2013, 10:25:29 am
Probably.  His stuff exceeds his command, and there is no reason to hurry him at this point.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on March 30, 2013, 10:35:37 am
Dave, dallen's talking about Saunders, not Peralta.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 30, 2013, 10:47:08 am
Sorry.  I am also a little surprised that Saunders isn't opening in Daytona.  But they have a little log jam in the minors with middle infielders, so perhaps they are going slowly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 30, 2013, 10:48:04 am
Have the minor league rosters been set already?  There is usually a lot of shuffling at the last minute.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on March 30, 2013, 11:19:16 am
Quote
Phil Rogers ‏@ChiTribRogers
Cubs' minor league releases include 2010 first-rounder Hayden Simpson, Dontrelle Willis and Michael Brenly.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on March 30, 2013, 12:27:34 pm
Too bad for Dontrelle.  I guess the Cubs would have had to pay him a $100K retention bonus to stay around, and apparently he didn't show enough to justify even that.

Also, I guess there's not much left to be said about Hayden Simpson that hasn't been said already.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: chgojhawk on March 30, 2013, 12:53:00 pm
We saved money on Simpson when we drafted him.  I think the old regime figured that most of their picks were likely to flame out so why not take one who will sign for cheap.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on March 30, 2013, 01:28:14 pm
Sorry to see Brenly fail.  His father was a nice guy, and I assume he is also.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 30, 2013, 01:46:32 pm
I never considered Brenly to be a serious prospect.  I think he enjoyed the ride.  Next spring, I wouldn't be shocked to see him as a spare catcher in DBack camp.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 30, 2013, 03:55:51 pm
We saved money on Simpson when we drafted him.  I think the old regime figured that most of their picks were likely to flame out so why not take one who will sign for cheap.

It is more likely ownership which was in the sell mode wasn't allowing the money needed for scouts, scouting or signing the prospects Hendry and company would have sought if the budget had been available.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on March 30, 2013, 03:57:44 pm
Too bad for Dontrelle.  I guess the Cubs would have had to pay him a $100K retention bonus to stay around, and apparently he didn't show enough to justify even that.

The $100K likely was less a concern than the fact that other prospects also need innings in actual games to develop, and every game Willis would start would be one more game some other prospect could not.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on March 31, 2013, 08:06:48 am
Happy Easter, everybody.  He is risen indeed!

For those of us who think the Easter story is great, but not too good to be true, it's a great story of hope.

While the outcome of a baseball team is much more trivial and relatively insignificant, it's fun to be hopeful for the Cubs as well.  Will be fun to see the minor league assignments come out in the next couple of days, and to hope that some of the guys who were promising will confirm their potential at higher levels, while also hoping that some other guys have somehow improved over the winter, have more future than perhaps we realized, and hope for some guys to step up a bunch.  Should be a fun spring and summer. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: FITS on March 31, 2013, 08:29:32 am
Well said, Craig.

Happy Easter, all.  It ain't about the bunny.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on March 31, 2013, 08:35:10 am
Happy Easter, everybody.  He is risen indeed!

For those of us who think the Easter story is great, but not too good to be true, it's a great story of hope.


Happy Easter, Craig. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on March 31, 2013, 10:13:29 am
Happy Easter everyone.  Wonderful sunny day to celebrate the greatest day in history!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on March 31, 2013, 12:12:42 pm
From Law on Pierce Johnson, this morning.  You'd think the Cubs would fix the mechanical issue, if they believed it would lead to problems.

 The Cubs took right-hander Pierce Johnson in the sandwich round in last year's draft, something made possible by a forearm strain he suffered that spring that took him out of first-round contention. He showed three promising pitches on Friday, working at 89-94 mph, more at the high end of that range starting in the second inning, with a slider that ranged from average to plus in the 70-84 range as well as an average change at 80-82 that he used to left- and right-handed hitters.

He also showed better fastball command in that outing than he had previously in the spring. I wasn't a fan of his arm action when he was at Missouri State, and it's still the same today -- he turns his pitching hand over extremely late, as he's bringing his forearm forward to release the ball, in a way that puts a lot of pressure directly on the elbow, called "valgus stress."

Turning the ball over is generally a positive thing for a pitcher because of the action it can put on the ball, but turning it over this late is unusual, and not something I want to see in a pitcher who's had forearm problems. If this is an empty concern, he's got the size and stuff to be a solid No. 3 starter down the road.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 01, 2013, 01:27:19 pm
http://www.oursportscentral.com/services/releases/?id=4566964 (http://www.oursportscentral.com/services/releases/?id=4566964)

Quote
The Daytona Cubs Organization has announced its tentative 2013 Opening Day roster.


1.  As expected, has Baez and Soler. 
2.  Has Bruno and Saunders, but NOT Torreyes.  So Torreyes and Alcantara must be with AA.
3.  Will be interesting how Saunders/Bruno share 2B/3B.  One plays only 2B, the other only 3B?  If so, which plays which?  Or will they both split time at both?
4.  DeVoss is still listed with the infielders, even though there are only 3 listed outfielders, and Az Phil had mentioned DeVoss playing OF in Mesa.
5.  Pierce Johnson is NOT listed.  I'd kind of assumed he'd start right out at Daytona. 
6.  A lot of roster-fill type pitchers. 
7.  Austin Kirk, who pitched extensively in AA last year to decent success, is back on the Daytona list. 
8.  Starling Peralta, Ben Wells, and Austin Reed are all listed, and are probably the most high-ceiling starter possibilities (if they start.)  I'd wondered if Reed might go back to Kane, but as a starter rather than relieving.  I'd also wondered whether given how short his season was due to injury, whether Ben Wells might repeat A-.  Perhaps a good sign that he's advanced; or perhaps they just don't want his arm going to Midwest league.
9.  Michael Jensen is NOT listed.  Of all the guys for Daytona's rotation, he was the one I thought was the most certain to be their, but I was wrong.  seems like he had too good a season to repeat at Kane, so that leaves two possibilities.  One is that he looked so good that they skipped him right up to AA.  The more likely, I assume, is that he's got some injury issue.  It doesn't look like the staff is so loaded with serious pitching prospects that they couldn't fit him into Daytona's staff or rotation, and if they wanted him at Daytona they could have also left Kirk at AA.  So either he's hurt, or else he looked so polished that they just decided that AA was the best place for him developmentally.  I want to hope for the latter, because if true that might reflect favorably on his progress.  I suppose a 3rd possibility is that the list is "unofficial", and when the actual official roster comes out he'll be there after all.  I just hope he's not hurt, because I like low-walk-low-HR control pitchers. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 01, 2013, 03:18:58 pm
A lot of roster-fill type pitchers. 

Certain similarities to the major league roster....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 01, 2013, 03:49:25 pm
Actually, apparently Torreyes was sent down to XST, according to Az Phil.  Interesting.  Disciplinary?  Convert him to catcher?  Who knows. 

Phil said Maples threw 2.1 innings with only 1 walk.  And that Carlos Martinez, who'd been reported to be released, pitched. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 01, 2013, 07:28:09 pm
http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130401&content_id=43651212&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_t446&sid=t446 (http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130401&content_id=43651212&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_t446&sid=t446)

Kane County preliminary.  Non-comprehensive list.  No surprises (given that Pierce Johnson isn't at Daytona) from what's listed.
Vogel, Amaya, Candelario, Hernandez, Martin
Johnson, Arias, Taylor Scott, Lendy Castillo
Heesch, Dorris

Not listed, but I know Dickson, Brian Smith, and Rock Shoulders are also there. 


Edit:  Here is an official list:  http://www.milb.com/documents/9/4/4/43653944/openingdayroster_3i2wu8va.pdf

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 01, 2013, 08:14:00 pm
http://iowa.cubs.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130401&content_id=43642790&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_t451&sid=t451

Iowa.  Lots of roster fillers, including 8 old RH relievers. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on April 01, 2013, 09:31:02 pm
when healthy, Almora to Kane County (fingers crossed)? And what about Reggie Golden?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 01, 2013, 09:39:12 pm
Golden very likely to go to Boise, unless he really shines in ESP.  I think the Cubs really want kane County to have an excellent team this year, consistent with their overall development plans.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 01, 2013, 09:42:17 pm
http://iowa.cubs.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130401&content_id=43642790&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_t451&sid=t451

Iowa.  Lots of roster fillers, including 8 old RH relievers. 

I always think it's interesting that Luis Flores keeps sticking around even with all of the drama and PED suspensions he's had. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 02, 2013, 12:09:01 pm
Does anyone remember Matt Weber?  If so what do you remember?  I am about to meet him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 02, 2013, 12:24:19 pm
He never made it out of A ball . . . although I guess you wouldn't want to mention that to him.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=weber-002mat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 02, 2013, 01:33:07 pm
He hurt his shoulder I guess.  For some reason I remember his name being discussed here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 02, 2013, 01:55:08 pm
He hurt his shoulder I guess.  For some reason I remember his name being discussed here.

148 innings at age 20.  http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=weber-002mat
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 02, 2013, 05:53:00 pm
Tennessee roster is up.  Neither Jensen nor Loosen are on it. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 05, 2013, 03:46:53 pm
Opening day boxes.

*

Jackson: 1-4, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_04_iowaaa_albaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Szczur: 3-4

Alcantara: 2-3, HR, 3 RBI, SB, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_04_tenaax_penaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Baez: 0-4, SF, RBI, 2 K

Solar: 2-4, K, PO/CS

Wells: 4-7-2-2-0-4, 2 HB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_04_breafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Vogelbach: 2-4

Johnson: 2-1/3 -6-5-5-1-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_04_qcsafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 05, 2013, 03:54:29 pm
Hopefully Brett Jackson's first game isn't indicative of anything. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on April 05, 2013, 04:09:29 pm
Chris, thanks in advance for keeping us up to date with the minor league boxes (and especially for the summaries/highlights for those of us too lazy to click).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 05, 2013, 04:58:17 pm
Jackson 0-3 with a K thus far today, through 5, Watkins with two hits and a walk.  Vitters hasn't played yet, I wonder how long he'll be out?  Other than Watkins and Jackson, the rest of the lineup seems to be about 28 or older. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 05, 2013, 05:21:40 pm
Jackson 0-3 with a K thus far today, through 5, Watkins with two hits and a walk.  Vitters hasn't played yet, I wonder how long he'll be out?  Other than Watkins and Jackson, the rest of the lineup seems to be about 28 or older. 

Hopefully Brett Jackson's first two games are not indicative of anything. 
And hopefully I won't have reason to say this after each game.   ;)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 05, 2013, 06:12:17 pm
Jackson is 0-4 thus far today, although his only K was called. 
Watkins is 3-3 including a triple, and a walk thus far.  Brad Nelson, in absence of Vitters, is playing 3B for IOwa.  Has two HR's. 
Blake Parker had a really good camp.  I wonder if it will carry over into real season. 

Baez gets his first hit of the season, 2-run homer in the first.  Peralta pitching. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 05, 2013, 06:36:21 pm
Peralta starting for Daytona.  Through 3, two walks and a HBP reflect the control challenges; but 4 K's, no hits, and nothing out of the infield reflect the intriguing stuff. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 05, 2013, 06:40:42 pm
Iowa loses big, Watkins ends up reaching base all five times (two walks and three hits), Jackson 0-5 with two K's. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on April 05, 2013, 07:50:18 pm
Baez has a homer and double so far tonight. Peralta was good in his innings and Devoss with a double, triple and walk. Cabrera is having a nice night for Tennessee and Szcur has another hit and a walk. Tayler Scott with good outing for Kane County (5 IP, 4 H, no runs, no BB, 6 Ks).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 05, 2013, 09:41:17 pm
Baez: 2-5, 2B, HR, 2 RBI, 2 K

Soler: 1-5

Peralta: 4-1/3 -1-0-0-3-5


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_05_dbcafa_breafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Vogelbach: 0-4, 2 K, E

Scott: 6-4-1-0-0-6

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_05_qcsafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 05, 2013, 10:00:24 pm
Szczur: 1-4, RBI, BB

Villanueva: 3-5, 2B, 4 RBI

Cabrera: 6-4-2-2-0-9  (77 pitches, 54 strikes)

Rosscup: 2-1-0-0-0-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_05_tenaax_penaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_05_iowaaa_albaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 05, 2013, 10:11:24 pm
15K/0BB for the Tennessee pitchers.  Rosscup with 5K in two innings. 

I'll be interested to see how Rosscup does. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 06, 2013, 12:25:05 am
15K/0BB for the Tennessee pitchers.  Rosscup with 5K in two innings.

You would almost think they were facing Cub hitters....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 06, 2013, 01:36:28 am
Quote
While Cardinals righthander Carlos Martinez has arrived in the United States, Cubs righthander Juan Carlos Paniagua remains in the Dominican Republic as he awaits his visa.

Martinez and Paniagua are two high-profile Dominican pitching prospects with a history of paperwork question marks and disciplinary action from Major League Baseball who have dealt with visa delays this spring.

...


While Martinez’s situation has been straightened out and he is now in the U.S., Paniagua is still waiting in the Dominican Republic. Ultimately Paniagua, who received his visa last year and played in the U.S. after signing for $1.5 million in July, is likely to receive his visa and play at some point this year, but there’s no timetable for his arrival.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/carlos-martinez-arrives-juan-carlos-paniagua-still-waiting-for-visa/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 06, 2013, 04:51:09 pm
Amaya:  2-6, 2B, K

Vogelbach: 3-6, 2B, RBI, K

Candelario: 2-6, 2B

Arias: 1-2/3 -7-7-6-0-2


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_06_qcsafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 06, 2013, 09:12:27 pm
Soler: 2-3, HR, RBI, BB

Baez: 0-4, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_06_breafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 06, 2013, 10:19:31 pm
Szczur: 2-7, 3 RBI, 2 K

Villanueva: 2-5, RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_06_tenaax_penaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 06, 2013, 10:31:08 pm
It's a non-prospect-apalooza.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2013, 12:18:35 am
Jackson: 1-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_06_iowaaa_albaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2013, 05:17:45 pm
Vogelbach, Amaya, Candelario: 2-18, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_07_qcsafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Jackson: 1-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_07_iowaaa_albaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 07, 2013, 06:08:34 pm
It's too early to panic, but so far Brett Jackson has 2 hits (both singles) 0 walks and 5 strike outs in 13 ABs.  Certainly not promising results yet.  Man, I hope he gets things sorted out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 07, 2013, 07:01:36 pm
This is Jackson's spring training, effectively.  He's barely faced live pitching.  If his K rate still looks like that in two weeks I'll be worried.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2013, 07:12:12 pm
Soler: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, IBB, K

Baez: 1-4, K, SB, HBP, 2 E

Francescon: 7-4-0-0-1-9

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_07_dbcafa_breafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 07, 2013, 07:48:31 pm
Hendricks: 5-8-5-5-2-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_07_tenaax_penaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 07, 2013, 08:01:50 pm
Assuming Soler continues as he has been for the next month and a half, do the Cubs leave him at Kane County, or bump him up?  And if they bump him, would it only be to Daytona or up to Tennessee?  My guess is that the Cubs will try to move him aggressively.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 07, 2013, 08:03:06 pm
He's already at Daytona.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 07, 2013, 08:06:34 pm
See how fast that was?

Okay, so the question should be Tennessee or Iowa.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 07, 2013, 10:41:08 pm
I doubt that they would move him to Iowa.  I wouldn't be surprised if he got to Tennessee by the end of June if he stays dominant.

But I don't think it is likely that he would stay this dominant once the league has seen him and had a chance to adjust to him.

But hope springs eternal
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 07, 2013, 11:07:33 pm
Nice to see Soler doing well. It's only four games, but often the very start is the hardest.  Baez with three errors in 4 games, as many errors as hits.  But getting hit today got his OBP over .200, so his start isn't really much off of what he did their last summer.  Hopefully he gets going. 

Amaya with 5K's in 3 games, he was also a fairly high-K guy last year.  Maybe movement will be harder for him then anticipated. 

Saunders with 6 K's already, not a good sign. 

By contrast, Bruno has started off very hot.  He was a batting champion in Boise, and like Amaya had a good rep as a batsman.  But his K-rate there was fairly high for a short contact batsman.  So he'd seem to be a candidate for the Boise's-nice-but-wait-for-full-season.  He'd also been a very low walk guy in college, so sometimes when a guy faces more challenging pitching either the K's go up or the walks stay or go down.  But he's off to a very quick start, with 3 walks already and only 1 K, and high average, despite skipping a level.  Go Bruno. 

I don't think I'd have included DeVoss anywhere in my top 50 or 60, but he's off to a quick start.  5BB/3K/4SB are some nice lines.  I'm not a big believer in guys who hit in the .240's and K a lot without power in low-A.  But if he can support .380-type OBP's, while stealing a bunch, he'll stay on radar.  We'll see where he's at after 40 games instead of 4, of course. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 07, 2013, 11:15:35 pm
Would be extremely nice if he could get a September callup and actually be starting in RF next year.... but that is hoping for even a bit more than you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 08, 2013, 08:58:32 am
Quote from: Phil Rogers
One Cub who is hitting: Jorge Soler. The $30 million Cuban was assigned to high-A Daytona out of minor-league camp but might not be there more than a month or two. He went 7-for-16 with two homers in Daytona’s first four games, with as many walks (two) as strikeouts. Outfielder John Andreoli, a 17th-round pick from the University of Connecticut in the 2011 draft, is hitting .467 with a .556 on-base percentage after the first series. Shortstop Javier Baez is on that team.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 08, 2013, 09:10:05 am
Jorge Soler's second pitch Saturday night homer


Note that Jorge did not like the strike call on the first pitch and turned around to say something to the plate ump.  The ump pointed at the batters box and must have said "get back in there"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JPs9KwZOLk&feature=player_detailpage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JPs9KwZOLk&feature=player_detailpage)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 08, 2013, 09:47:59 am
His hands look a little more forward than I recall from a video or two last year.  Looks like it may require a little more time to load the hands back before swinging forward. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 08, 2013, 03:10:32 pm
I'm not a big believer in guys who hit in the .240's and K a lot without power in low-A.  But if he can support .380-type OBP's, while stealing a bunch, he'll stay on radar.

And if pigs can fly, they will make it to the radar.

Low power hitters who bat .240 are not going to remotely approach an  OBP of .380 in the majors.  It will be rare that they reach an OBP of .300.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 08, 2013, 06:32:21 pm
Amaya: 3-5, 3B, SB, K

Vogelbach: 0-4, SF, 2 RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_08_cliafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Daytona off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 08, 2013, 09:28:47 pm
Szczur: 2-3, SB, BB, K

Rosscup: 1-1-0-0-0-3  (8 K's, 0 BB in 3 IP)



http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_08_tenaax_penaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 08, 2013, 11:06:07 pm
Jackson: 2-4, 3B, 2 RBI, K

Loux: 1-3-6-6-3-2

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_08_iowaaa_rreaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on April 08, 2013, 11:52:18 pm
I wonder how long Rosscup, Zych, McNutt will last in AA.  The Iowa bullpen has been underwhelming.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on April 09, 2013, 01:38:00 pm
has sczur gotten a XBH hit yet this yr? here we go again.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 09, 2013, 02:07:54 pm
I'm not Sczur.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 09, 2013, 02:55:48 pm
has sczur gotten a XBH hit yet this yr? here we go again.

No.  In his 25 plate appearances, the bum has no extra base hits. He does have 9 singles, 2 walks (3 Ks), 2 stolen bases (0 CS), 6 runs scored, 4 RBI, a .409 BA, .480 OBP, .889 OPS however.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 09, 2013, 03:43:18 pm
Amaya: 2-5, CS, 3 K

Vogelbach: 3-5

Johnson: 5-6-2-2-2-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_09_cliafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Tennessee off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 09, 2013, 03:56:31 pm
Vogelbach is hitting .310, with one double, the rest all singles and no walks.  Heh heh, thus far he's been kind of a Darwin Barney. 
Amaya already has 9 K's in 5 games. 

As JR has noted, the jump from short-season to full-season is massive.  And none of these guys have probably played a lot of 40-50 degree baseball before, either.  So the cream will presumably rise to the top in due time. 

Having Amaya strike out so much is a concern, though.  His reputation is as a contact hitter, but his whiff-rate was a concern already at Boise. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 09, 2013, 04:17:37 pm
Vogelbach is from Florida, so it is probably a safe bet he hasn't played a lot of 40-50 degree baseball.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 09, 2013, 04:18:54 pm
Quote
The Office of the Commissioner of Baseball announced today that Chicago Cubs Minor League right-handed pitcher Pedro Silverio has received a 50-game suspension without pay after testing positive for Metabolites of Stanozolol, a performance-enhancing substance in violation of the Minor League Drug Prevention and Treatment Program.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 09, 2013, 04:49:14 pm
Anyone have more about Pedro Silverio?  Not much here -- http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=silver002ped
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on April 09, 2013, 05:56:18 pm
Question about the Kane County box score: The Cougars led 4-3 going into the bottom of the eighth. The other team scored one in the eighth to tie the game. The Cougars scored two in the ninth to win it. How did both relief pitchers get charged with a blown save?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 09, 2013, 06:02:22 pm
Question about the Kane County box score: The Cougars led 4-3 going into the bottom of the eighth. The other team scored one in the eighth to tie the game. The Cougars scored two in the ninth to win it. How did both relief pitchers get charged with a blown save?
Antigua blew the save in the sixth, blew a 3-2 lead in the 6th.  Then Orozco blew a 5-3 lead in the 9th and got the win. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 09, 2013, 06:43:12 pm
There is no limit to the number of pitchers who can have a blown save in the same game.  Each pitcher who fails to protect a lead gets one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 09, 2013, 06:53:14 pm
Practically speaking, I think the limit would be 25, unless you have expanded rosters.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 09, 2013, 10:13:03 pm
Baez: 1-5, 3B, 2 K

Soler: 2-4, RBI, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_09_clrafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Jackson: 2-4, 3B, K, PO/CS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_09_iowaaa_rreaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 10, 2013, 06:03:39 am
Soler line -- .450/.522/.750/1.272
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 10, 2013, 07:36:30 am
Javier Baez has extended his longest hitting streak of his two-year career at Daytona.  The Jolting-Joe of the FSL has a two-game hitting streak!   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 10, 2013, 07:38:34 pm
Vogelbach: 1-3, SF, RBI, BB

Candelario: 0-2, 3 BB

Scott: 2-3-4-4-5-0

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_10_cliafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on April 10, 2013, 08:09:06 pm
There were 18 walks in that Kane County game. It had to be nearly impossible to get a good grip on the ball for the pitchers. Really surprising that they even played as the weather in the greater Chicago area is just miserable today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 10, 2013, 08:55:11 pm
Reading Twitter, it sounds like Soler got mad at one of the opposing players tonight and went after the opposition dugout with a bat.  Not good.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 10, 2013, 09:34:33 pm
Beh, Soler seemed too good to be true. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 10, 2013, 09:43:41 pm
http://cubbiescrib.com/2013/04/10/bat-wielding-jorge-soler-ejected-from-game-after-bench-clearing-brawl/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 10, 2013, 10:01:49 pm
Baez: 0-5, BB, 3 K, E

Wells: 4-7-4-3-4-0

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_10_clrafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb



Alcantara: 1-4, 2B, 3 K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_10_cngaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 10, 2013, 10:23:53 pm
Jackson: 0-3, BB, 2 K, HBP, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_10_iowaaa_rreaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: PRCubFan on April 10, 2013, 11:37:09 pm
Looks like Soler is going to be out a while.  During an altercation with the team they played tonight, Soler grabbed a bat and charged the other team's dugout and started taking swings in their direction.  He got ejected from the game.  Baez apparently was the one that was trying to hold him back.  We'll see how long he'll get suspended after this but from what everyone is reporting, they expect him to get suspended. 

http://nesn.com/2013/04/report-cubs-prospect-jorge-soler-attacks-opponents-dugout-wielding-bat-1/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on April 11, 2013, 12:04:24 am
Looks like Soler is going to be out a while.  During an altercation with the team they played tonight, Soler grabbed a bat and charged the other team's dugout and started taking swings in their direction.  He got ejected from the game.  Baez apparently was the one that was trying to hold him back.  We'll see how long he'll get suspended after this but from what everyone is reporting, they expect him to get suspended. 

http://nesn.com/2013/04/report-cubs-prospect-jorge-soler-attacks-opponents-dugout-wielding-bat-1/


Please don't be another Zambrano.  I don't even recall him doing anything that crazy.  It's almost too outlandish to be believed, but being reported, I'd guess it's true....I just don't get why charge it after everything seems to be being calmed down?  What could his thought process have been, or I guess lack of thought process in this case.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 11, 2013, 12:33:05 am
Quote
DAYTONA BEACH — It only took Daytona's Jorge Soler a few seconds to make it from his dugout to that of the Clearwater Threshers following the seventh inning of his team's 14-9 extra-inning loss Wednesday night.

But considering the fact that Soler — a 21-year-old who was given a nine-year, $30-million contract by the Cubs last year — was wielding a bat as he charged across the field at Jackie Robinson Ballpark, Daytona manager Dave Keller said those few seconds were “kind of like a nightmare.”

Soler was caught by teammates near the Threshers' dugout, and he never swung the bat. But the heralded prospect was ejected following the incident, and Keller said he did not know if there would be further punishment from the Cubs or the Florida State League.

The incident followed a confrontation between Soler and Clearwater's Edgar Alonso at second base following the final play of the seventh. Soler slid into the base on the play, and he and Alonso exchanged words. Teammates from each side came out to separate the two, and the groups headed back to their dugouts. But Soler came sprinting back out of the Cubs' dugout — bat in hand — toward the Threshers dugout.

“I think that he was frustrated by some things and there was some emotional things he was fighting with,” Keller said. “Why he did that, I don't know. I think he was frustrated by what happened. When he slid into second base, (Alonso) ended up laying on top of him. He was laying on him so (Soler) pushed with his arm to get him off him, and I think the second baseman interpreted that the wrong way like he wanted to fight or something.”

Keller said the two sides exchanged words and that Soler was upset about some of the things said to him.

“There were two separate incidents, and there was really no fight,” he said. “But because nobody was around him when he was running across the field with a bat … that makes things a little bit crazy.”


http://www.news-journalonline.com/article/20130410/SPORTS/130419967/1040?Title=D-Cubs-prospect-Soler-wields-bat-stopped-near-Threshers-dugout
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 11, 2013, 12:50:02 am
In the sad coincidence department since Daytona was playing the Clearwater Threshers:

It was 50 years ago today that the USS Thresher sank

(http://www.ussthresher.com/images/thres.jpg)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 11, 2013, 08:04:04 am
Looks like Soler is going to be out a while.  During an altercation with the team they played tonight, Soler grabbed a bat and charged the other team's dugout and started taking swings in their direction.  He got ejected from the game.  Baez apparently was the one that was trying to hold him back.  We'll see how long he'll get suspended after this but from what everyone is reporting, they expect him to get suspended. 

http://nesn.com/2013/04/report-cubs-prospect-jorge-soler-attacks-opponents-dugout-wielding-bat-1/

Same old Cubs.  Unbelievable.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 11, 2013, 08:12:00 am
Not really.  If it was the same old Cubs, Baez would've torn his ACL trying to hold Soler back. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 11, 2013, 09:48:36 am
There's not a Youtube clip of the Jorge Soler incident anywhere to be found.  If one of the 1,236 fans had one, it would have been posted by now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 11, 2013, 10:00:01 am
As soon as I say that, here's a short one that really doesn't show anything.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-rc8V_E1Ok&feature=youtu.be
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: rjzebra on April 11, 2013, 10:23:05 am
What Soler did can not be defended in any situation as the "Judges" here have clearly pointed out.  Has anyone of our experts here ever been intentionally spiked?  No mention of this at all.  Not sure I wouldn't go after the SOB myself!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on April 11, 2013, 10:41:09 am
It sounds like he didn't actually swing the bat and was restrained by teammates.  We also don't know what the 2nd baseman did/said to set him off.  It is bad, but I don't think this puts him in the Ron Artest/Joey Belle/Milton Bradley catagory yet.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 11, 2013, 01:22:24 pm
Twitter report of a five game suspension, undisclosed fine. 

Theo said Soler did not swing the bat or hit anyone, and he was provoked when someone on the other team said something about his family.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 11, 2013, 01:28:09 pm
Five games isn't really too bad, especially considering the initial reports (which turned out to be wildly inaccurate).

Hopefully, Jorge Soler will learn from this, move forward and grow as a person.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: jacey1 on April 11, 2013, 01:35:11 pm
he is a young kid and got mad when someone made some comment about his momma or something like that...someone fairly new to the baseball culture in the US and a young kid not really understanding, led to this outburst i presume
 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: AndyMacFAIL on April 11, 2013, 02:00:16 pm
  report on MLB Network said Soler suspended for five games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: AndyMacFAIL on April 11, 2013, 02:31:15 pm
  report on MLB Network said Soler suspended for five games.

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/eye-on-baseball/22051821/jorge-soler-to-be-suspended-for-bat-wielding-incident (http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/eye-on-baseball/22051821/jorge-soler-to-be-suspended-for-bat-wielding-incident)

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 11, 2013, 04:06:48 pm
Cabrera: 6-8-4-4-2-5, 2 WP

Villanueva: 1-4, RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_11_cngaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Kane County rained out.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 12, 2013, 12:16:36 am
Baez: 0-4, K

Peralta: 6-8-6-6-0-7, 4 HR

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_11_clrafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Jackson: 1-3, SB, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_11_iowaaa_rreaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 12, 2013, 06:36:06 am
Baez at .515 OPS.  Heh, his HBP is keeping his OPS over .500 and his OBP within a hot day of .200, so be thankful for good things where you can find them. 

HR may be an ongoing challenge for Peralta.  11HR/99IP at Peoria last year, in a league where there are very few good HR hitters and where the league average is more likely around 4 HR/99IP.  Hopefully that's all part of the development process for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 12, 2013, 07:45:07 am
Jackson is creeping up toward a .700 OPS, and his K% is now at 33% of PA.  A good week and his numbers would look pretty good.  Here's hoping for about 12 good weeks or so, so that he can be called up.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 12, 2013, 03:44:24 pm
Josh Vitters is on the DL with a sore back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 12, 2013, 03:46:27 pm
I think it started about a week back.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 12, 2013, 04:29:00 pm
Kane County DH scheduled for today snowed out. Now two sets of DH's scheduled for the weekend.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 12, 2013, 09:08:50 pm
Szczur: 1-3, RBI, BB, 2 SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_12_cngaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Baez: 1-4, RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_12_dbcafa_tbyafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 13, 2013, 12:44:23 am
Jackson: 0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_12_albaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 13, 2013, 08:39:02 am
Szczur: 1-3, RBI, BB, 2 SB
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_12_cngaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
..

Buried in the AA box score, it shows Ronald Torreyes pinch-hitting and taking a walk.  I assume that's real, although the box scores can make mistakes. 

Will be interesting to see if he plays regularly and if he can have any success.  May also be interesting to see whether he can both show the good contact that he'd shown in A-ball, while at the same time raising his walk-rate.  Clearly if he has a future, it's not as a power hitter or as a defensive asset; if he makes it as a good player it will be on account of his OBP.  One might think that being a short guy with contact skill, he could get some walks and wouldn't need to be quite as terrified of 2-strike counts. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 13, 2013, 09:22:34 am
And if I read ArizonaPhil's reports correctly, he also had several strike outs.  Lack of strike outs was one stand out stat for him up til now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 13, 2013, 09:23:04 am
0 extra-base hits for Sczur so far this year, wow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 13, 2013, 11:08:45 am
And if I read ArizonaPhil's reports correctly, he also had several strike outs.  Lack of strike outs was one stand out stat for him up til now.

Yeah, we always think a guy can get better.  But I think often guys have come to a pretty optimal equilibrium in their hitting.  Try to walk more?  The K's go up, maybe the power and average go down.  Too many K's?  Adjustments to reduce come at expense of walks and power.   So a fair chance that if Torreyes walks more, whatever he gains there will be more than lost in K's and reduced average. 

With Jackson, we'll see whether some of his adjustments can eventually help his contact problems.  But maybe it's no surprise that he's hit no HR's yet, either in camp or in Iowa.  If his K's make an anti-awful shift, but he no longer hits a lot of HR's, will he be any better off? 

Hopefully some of these guys will be able to make adjustments that really do work overall. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 13, 2013, 11:26:29 am
Buried in the AA box score, it shows Ronald Torreyes pinch-hitting and taking a walk.  I assume that's real, although the box scores can make mistakes. 

Will be interesting to see if he plays regularly and if he can have any success.  May also be interesting to see whether he can both show the good contact that he'd shown in A-ball, while at the same time raising his walk-rate.  Clearly if he has a future, it's not as a power hitter or as a defensive asset; if he makes it as a good player it will be on account of his OBP.  One might think that being a short guy with contact skill, he could get some walks and wouldn't need to be quite as terrified of 2-strike counts. 

Torreyes started last year on the field, but was playing injured and had a terrible first month or so.  Has anyone heard why yesterday;s pinch hit AB was his first trip to the plate this year?  Another injury?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 13, 2013, 11:28:41 am
0 extra-base hits for Sczur so far this year, wow.

And yet 7 runs scored in 8 games.

Wow.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 13, 2013, 12:14:31 pm
Torreyez spent the first week or so in Arizona in extended SP.  He reported a week late, so perhaps they just gave him extra time.  No reports of injuries.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 13, 2013, 01:55:52 pm
Any word on why he reported late to spring training?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 13, 2013, 03:26:38 pm
http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_13_kccafx_wisafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb

Kane got a game in, lost first game of DH, Ian Dickson got rocked.  Everybody walked at last once except Amaya.  Vogelbach hit his first HR and walked twice.  He's currently at a .324 average in 34 AB, with 3BB/4K.  It's really early, and the stats can change a lot with a good game or a bad game.  But he seems to be off to a decent start.  Given the enormity of the jump from Boise to Midwest, plus the bad weather the depresses hitting, the early results aren't showing any red flags offensively. 

Wilson Contreras K'd 3 times.  I've been hoping he might be a breakout guy.  Candelario got his second XBH of the year.  Hasn't been hitting much, but hasn't been K'ing a bunch either, so that's a good sign that he's not overmatched. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 13, 2013, 03:30:59 pm
How 'bout the Rock?  Does he have a defensive position that he can play?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 13, 2013, 03:35:57 pm
He can play any defensive position.

Just not very well.

Actually, they have talked about playing him at third base, but I don't think they have actually tried it.  He HAS played left field a bit, but don't know how well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 13, 2013, 03:47:49 pm
Arias was in the original rotation, and got killed his one start.  I think he was scheduled to start a few days ago, before the cancellations, but isn't pitching either game today. 

Hurt?  Maybe not so healthy, they just don't him pitching in the bad weather?  Or maybe when it's the cancellation April do they just have guys throw inside in a cage to stay on schedule, and miss games? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 13, 2013, 04:34:44 pm
Thanks, Dave.  The Rock may have DH potential.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 13, 2013, 07:28:50 pm
Vogelbach: 0-5, 2 K

Candelario: 2-3, 2 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_13_kccafx_wisafx_2&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 13, 2013, 08:44:18 pm
Baez: 2-4, 2B, 3B

Bruno: 2-4, 2 RBI, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_13_dbcafa_tbyafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Alcantara:2-5, HR, 3 RBI, E

Torreyes: 2-3, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_13_cngaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 13, 2013, 09:52:43 pm
Jackson: 1-4, 3B, RBI, BB, 2 K

Watkins: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, 2 BB, CS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_13_albaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 14, 2013, 02:33:13 pm
Baez: 1-4, 2B

Del Valle: 1-0-0-0-0-3  ( 9 K's, 1 BB in 4-1/3 IP )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_14_dbcafa_tbyafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb



KC's DH snowed out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 14, 2013, 04:40:19 pm
Torreyes: 2-3, RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_14_cngaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb

Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_14_albaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 14, 2013, 09:46:17 pm
Baez!  He's got a 3-game hitting streak going, the longest of his Daytona career. 

Not sure how recent it is, but Az Phil reports Loosen pitching 3 innings, and Conway with three good innings and 42 pitches.  Baez 4 hits that day, 0-for days for Soler, Dunston, Golden. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 15, 2013, 08:57:54 am
I thought Soler was suspended.  Has his suspension already ended?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 15, 2013, 09:37:01 am
I think he's suspended from minor league games.  But I think he's free to practice and do stuff in Mesa and XST. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 15, 2013, 11:30:36 am
I think he's suspended from minor league games.  But I think he's free to practice and do stuff in Mesa and XST. 

So when Arizona Phil includes Soler in his "O for" list (along with Dunston and Golden) he's referring to extended spring training or Mesa games? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 15, 2013, 01:18:16 pm
Yes.  Phil goes to some of those games and reports what happens when he goes.  Phil is pretty much the only source of info on what's happening in XST games. 

Those are formally just "practice" or "scrimmage" games.  He mentioned that Stewart would get to bat every inning, for example, something that wouldn't happened in a FSL game.  Once in a while they'll go an extra inning to get a pitcher some work; or quit early if they run out of pitchers; or quit mid-inning if a guy hits his pitch-count and they don't want to bring in a guy for partial-inning relief.  So Soler's suspension doesn't preclude him from involvement in those kinds of games. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 15, 2013, 04:18:47 pm
Jackson: 1-3, BB, 2 K, SB

Chapman: 2-3-3-3-0-2   ( 6-1/3 IP, 14 H, 4 BB, 12 R, overall )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_15_albaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 15, 2013, 05:06:08 pm
Brett Jackson isn't setting the world on fire, and he is striking out a lot. That said, his 15 Ks is "only" 33% of his plate appearances.  His BA is only .244, but his OBP is .340, with his OPS creeping up slightly over .700.  Obviously we'd like to see more power and even fewer Ks, but it could be much worse. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 15, 2013, 05:47:27 pm
Jackson's stats look pretty identical to the 2012 version at Iowa, minus the power.  Using K/AB (because K's and AB's are listed by milb.com but PA's aren't), the following 2013 numbers versus 2012 look essentially unchanged:  (The comparison is to Iowa, not to his stint with the Cubs)

K/AB:  37% versus 38%
BA:  .244 versus .256
OBP:  .340 versus .338

The only noticeable change is that the slugging is gone:
Slugging:  .366 versus .479
OPS:  .706 versus .817

Obviously it's a small sample.   But thus far, it's hard to see any evidence that the changes have done any good.  Yet.  But, patience is a virtue. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on April 15, 2013, 06:10:46 pm
Jackson's stats look pretty identical to the 2012 version at Iowa, minus the power.  Using K/AB (because K's and AB's are listed by milb.com but PA's aren't), the following 2013 numbers versus 2012 look essentially unchanged:  (The comparison is to Iowa, not to his stint with the Cubs)

K/AB:  37% versus 38%
BA:  .244 versus .256
OBP:  .340 versus .338

The only noticeable change is that the slugging is gone:
Slugging:  .366 versus .479
OPS:  .706 versus .817

Obviously it's a small sample.   But thus far, it's hard to see any evidence that the changes have done any good.  Yet.  But, patience is a virtue. 

You can get PAs at baseballreference if you click on minors on the player page.  It takes a day to include the most recent game.  Of course, you can add walks to ABs at milb.com but not everything.

Hard to take away much of anything good in Jackson's performance so far.  But, of course, way too small sample size at this point. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 15, 2013, 10:10:04 pm
Alcantara: 0-5, 4 K

Villanueva: 0-1, 3 BB, K, CS

Zych: 1-1/3 -2-2-2-1-0

McNutt: 1-1/3 -3-3-3-2-0

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_15_tenaax_hunaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Baez: 0-5, 2 K

Bruno: 2-4, 2B

Wells: 6-5-0-0-1-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_15_dbcafa_clrafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Kane County rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 15, 2013, 10:37:57 pm
Quote
McNutt: 1-1/3 -3-3-3-2-0

I still remember Hendry trying to talk down the prospect package in the Garza trade because we supposedly thought McNutt was a better prospect than Archer. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 15, 2013, 10:38:49 pm
Very nice start for Ben Wells, by the way.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 16, 2013, 07:06:29 am
Ha is hot.  .368 average with 5 walks, his OBP is over .450.  Nice outfielder.  He's still only 22, so maybe there is still some development left for him?  Probably just a fluke case of a hot week in April makes the stats look great, so not likely very sustainable, particularly with his bad K/HR rate.  (BABIP is around .500....).  He has no game power, so perhaps somewhat Barney-Theriot like.   He did take some walks last year, and with two yesterday they look good early, but we'll see how that holds up.  He was a strong anti-walk guy in A-ball.  Last year he added walks, at the usual price of a huge jump in K's and loss in power and batting average. 

I'm always looking for asset starters.  But there's a chance that Ha could perhaps fill in for a while as an anti-awful guy.  If he could hit .275 with a .330 OBP while playing excellent CF defense, that might get him some action.  Almora is at best a long ways away; Sappelt and DeJesus don't look like long-timers; and Jackson is a long shot and probably a platoon guy if he does makes it. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 16, 2013, 08:41:04 am
Darwin Barney's line in 14 plate appearances with Iowa

.500/.615/.600/1.215
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 16, 2013, 08:44:20 am
That and a buck-sixty gets you a tall drip at Starbucks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 16, 2013, 09:06:22 am
Barney took 3 walks in a single game at Iowa.  That's a month's worth for him.  And that is the one area where there might still be a remote possibility that he'll show improvement offensively.  If he could walk 45+ times, without his average falling even lower, that would help. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 16, 2013, 09:25:22 am
Last year Bruno's numbers at the plate were so high they looked a bit flukish.  This year he is at
.395/.447/.512/.958.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 16, 2013, 09:37:58 am
Bruno's not likely to sustain a .460 BABIP.  But, of course, he doesn't have to.  Those numbers can fall off a long way and it still looks like good output for a guy skipping from Boise to Daytona.  Last year he K'd a lot at Boise (47K/252 AB), so I wondered if he'd be a victim to the Boise-bubble bursting.  But at 6K/43AB thus far, that doesn't look worrisome. 

Still, as a short low-power guy who isn't much of a walker, he's going to need to continue to really BABIP.  Without IsoP or IsoD, you better hit for very good average.  So far so good.  Fun to see. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 16, 2013, 10:28:54 am
Last year he K'd a lot at Boise (47K/252 AB), so I wondered if he'd be a victim to the Boise-bubble bursting.  But at 6K/43AB thus far, that doesn't look worrisome.

The difference between 47/252 and 6/43 is in the statistical noise category.  It is the difference between 18.65% and 13.95%, and even the first figure was not particularly troublesome.

Even if he has no real HR power, if he strikes out relatively infrequently, puts the bat on the ball solidly enough to have real doubles power, gets a few walks, can play 2B, SS and 3B as well as OF, he's got some serious value.  Not close to a cornerstone piece for a strong club, but the kind of guy strong clubs love to have around.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 16, 2013, 01:42:02 pm
I generally agree, jes.  While going from 18.7% K to 14% K would be meaningful over a full season, not much in two weeks.  If he K's in his first one or two AB's tonight, he'll be right back at last year's pace. 

But I think it is meaningful when a guy who may be a K-risk moves up two levels without problem (including the most difficult step in the minors).  If your K-rate is questionable at one level, that's often a flag that you'll be overmatched at higher levels.  But that doesn't appear to be happening to Bruno, good for him. 

K-rates typically go up with league, not down.  (And I suspect they'd go up even more if hitters didn't make compromises in order to prevent K'ing more.  Cutting back on power swing; swinging earlier in the count to reduce the volume of 2-strike counts.....)  We've seen that with Jackson and others.  If they could have taken their Daytona-level K-rates up to the majors without compromising their power, they'd have been successful.  But that didn't happen, things got worse.  We've often seen the same with guys going from short-season to full-season.  (Amaya may be at risk.  Perhaps his K-rate at Boise should make his poor start unsurprising.). 

The fact that Bruno advanced two steps, and it hasn't seemed to give him any trouble thus far, is more exception than rule.  But it's nice. 


In his case, though, if he was K'ing around 19% in Boise, and given that he hasn't been walk-inclined, it won't be easy.  If 20% of your AB's don't go in play, and almost all of those are outs (K's) rather than HR's, then you need an awfully strong BABIP to get your overall batting average up.  (If you're batting 0.058 on 20% of your AB's, you need to BABIP .360+ on the other 80% to hit .300....).  So good batting average isn't easy if you K fairly much but don't HR much.  And if you don't hit HR's or walk much, then you'd better have a good average or you're kinda stuck. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 16, 2013, 06:00:36 pm
But I think it is meaningful when a guy who may be a K-risk moves up two levels without problem (including the most difficult step in the minors).  If your K-rate is questionable at one level, that's often a flag that you'll be overmatched at higher levels.  But that doesn't appear to be happening to Bruno, good for him.

And that is the significant point here.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 16, 2013, 07:13:46 pm
KC Game 1 -


Vogelbach: 2-4, RBI, E

Amaya: 2-3, BB

Candelario: 1-3, 2B, SF, 2 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_16_kccafx_belafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 16, 2013, 08:32:52 pm
Ceasar with a home run tonight, along with Silva.  That is Silva's third of the season.

If Silva hits with power, he suddenly becomes an interesting prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 16, 2013, 08:36:50 pm
Matt Szczur and Rubi Silva are both non-prospects.  Live it.  Love it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 16, 2013, 08:53:01 pm
Maybe they'll have chances to be the next Doug Dascenzo and Jose Macias, respectively.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 16, 2013, 09:02:23 pm
Don't be ridiculous.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 16, 2013, 09:04:04 pm
Well I say that last post kind of in jest, but seriously, what are the odds that those guys have major league careers even that good?  Szczur's chances of having a Dascenzo type career are what?  Maybe 1 in 3 or 1 in 4?  1 in 5?  Worse? 

Rubi Silva's chances of ever being as good as Jose Macias are less than that?

Sometimes it's good to have a wakeup call that being even as good as Dascenzo or Macias is pretty tough.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 16, 2013, 09:09:19 pm
When I say "don't be ridiculous", I mean that those guys won't ever be as good as Dascenzo and Macias.  Not even close.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 16, 2013, 09:09:50 pm
Baez: 1-5, HR, RBI, SB, 3 K

Bruno: 2-2, 2B, 2 BB, CS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_16_dbcafa_clrafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


KC Game 2 -

Vogelbach: 0-3, BB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_16_kccafx_belafx_2&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 16, 2013, 09:12:13 pm
Szczur: 2-3, HR, RBI, SB, PO/CS, HBP

Cabrera: 6-7-2-2-2-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_16_tenaax_hunaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Jackson: DNP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_16_nasaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 17, 2013, 06:34:45 am
As much as I agree that the Cubs need to build a superior minor league operation I look at this timeline they keep talking about and it really could take 6 or 7 more years for the Cubs to compete.  What happens if the first wave of impact talent fails?  The major league budget is going to have to return to top 5 to fill in the holes.  Will Ricketts be willing to allow that considering the heavy debt burden he incurred to buy the team and now the increased load for the Wrigley remodel?  Asking a fan base to wait 5 or 6 years while paying the highest prices in baseball will get old in a hurry.  What happens when Soriano comes off the books?  Will the payroll drop even further? I feel like Cubs fans are being sold a bill of goods here that is at best even odds it pays off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 17, 2013, 07:25:03 am
The first wave of impact talent might well fail.  But the point of a farm system is to provide a continuous flood of impact talent.

The high debt level is a serious problem.  But hopefully, it will be mitigated by the increased revenue from the renovated stadium, increased revenue streams from jumbotron, luxury boxes, etc.

The new front office are not supermen, but they seem to know how to build an baseball infrastructure that is necessary for success in the current environment.

But nothing is certain.  We have no choice but to wait and see.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 17, 2013, 08:08:00 am
Matt Szczur and Rubi Silva are both non-prospects.  Live it.  Love it.

Szczur this season has scored 11 runs in 12 games.  For his minor league career he has scored 202 runs in 259 games.  He is being groomed as a leadoff hitter and scoring runs in 4 games out of five is a remarkably good clip, .78 runs a game.

By comparison, Rickey Henderson, the best leadoff hitter in at least the last 70 years and the alltime leader in runs scored, scored at the rate of .745 runs a game in the majors, and in his very best season for scoring runs in the majors his rate was .875.   In the minors he scored at the rate of .787 runs a game (.891 a game if you only count his stats before he was called up and ignore his minor league stats in his 40's in indy leagues); Vince Coleman scored at the rate of .701 runs a game in the minors and .619 runs a game in the majors.  Tim Raines was at .668 runs a game for his career, at .885 runs a game in his best season, and .758 in the minors before his callup.

The function of a leadoff hitter is to score runs.  Szczur has been doing that remarkably well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 17, 2013, 11:52:56 am
I know there is no choice Dave but I can't seem to  recall a team giving up on so many years for the promise of maybe competing at the end of the decade.  Washington is probably the closest but got lucky at the top of the draft with two generational talents in successive years.  I doubt that happens for the Cubs.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2013, 01:31:12 pm
I agree, Robb, it could be a long while.  The "future" is indefinitely distant in terms of success, and it could just keep getting pushed back if/when hope-for guys don't work out.  (A year ago, Vitters and Jackson perhaps looked like they might be core asset guys this summer or next.) 

When you're building with teenagers like Almora, it's going to be years before we know if they'll make it at all, much less be really good or not.  And even when they do arrive, it may take a while before they hit their peak. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2013, 01:41:13 pm
Weird with these morning games.  Tennessee has already played, winning 4-0.  Szczur rebounds from a good night with an 0-5, settling back into the .270's for average.  Torreyes doesn't play, I wonder what his health issues are?  When he has played he's walked with uncharacteristic frequency; I wonder if that's for real, or if there's something physical that's bothering him that's prompting him to take more pitches?  Rosscup two innings with zero K's.  For a while he was all whiffs.  Alcantara and Villanueva each got a hit, bump their average up to .233 and .225.  Villa's was his first HR.  Alcantara took an uncharacteristic 3 walks. 

Jokisch has never been subject to a lot of hype or discussion.  7K/0BB, 7GO/0 FO. 

I don't get the impression he has notable stuff, but in three starts he's allowed 1, 1, and 0 runs; only 1 HR; has allowed 3, 4, and 3 hits per game; and is 17K/3BB.  Awfully nice start stats-wise.  He had a 2.91 ERA in 17 AA starts last year, so handling AA hitters probably shouldn't be a shock.  Go Eric. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 17, 2013, 01:45:34 pm
I agree, Robb, it could be a long while.  The "future" is indefinitely distant in terms of success, and it could just keep getting pushed back if/when hope-for guys don't work out.  (A year ago, Vitters and Jackson perhaps looked like they might be core asset guys this summer or next.)   

I have to take issue with this, a bit. I can't think of anyone who would have said that Vitters "looked like he could be a core asset .... this summer or next."  And while Jackson is off to a rocky start, it is still possible that he could be such an asset (hope springs...).

The basic point that one never knows how prospects will turn out is obviously correct though.  It is what it is.  The theory the Cubs leadership is operating out of is not that any of these guys is a sure thing, but rather the more potential impact prospects you have, the more likely you'll end up with some who turn out the way you hope. 

Not all of these guys need to turn out well, even though it would be wonderful if they did, of course. While Baez has struggled mightily, Soler was off to a pretty good start, and the Cubs brass always said they expected him to be ready before Baez.  Almora hasn't been tested yet.  We'll see how he progresses once he's completely healthy.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 17, 2013, 01:51:37 pm
"You know that your future is still ahead of you."

- Thomas Dewey
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 17, 2013, 02:05:59 pm
I imagine that Hoyerstein plans to improve things over time with a combination of player development, savvy trades, and targeted free agent signings.  The player development side will be an ongoing process but at some point in the next couple of years, products of our system together with the judicious addition of players from elsewhere should allow us to be competitive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2013, 02:28:10 pm
Ron, Vitters was hitting very well, with power and with improved walk-rates, at Iowa for a while.  And there was some favorable talk about improved defense. 
He ended with an .869 OPS at Iowa, and 17HR in 100 games, and I think he may have gone up over .900 for a while before slumping prior to the callup?  Heh, so I admit I was hoping he was going to work out as a core-guy bat.  (Heh, maybe I'm extending my own optimism to others when there was never anybody else who was thinking he might work out....) 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on April 17, 2013, 02:29:12 pm
Where is Vitters now?  Is he injured or has he just confirmed non-prospect status?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2013, 02:31:08 pm
I imagine that Hoyerstein plans to improve things over time with a combination of player development, savvy trades, and targeted free agent signings.  The player development side will be an ongoing process but at some point in the next couple of years, products of our system together with the judicious addition of players from elsewhere should allow us to be competitive.

Judicious trades might be hard when there is little to trade.  Marmol?  Cody Ransom?  Lillibridge?  Soriano?  WE've got so few guys who are age/competence attractive.  Trade game will be tough. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2013, 02:31:54 pm
Where is Vitters now?  Is he injured or has he just confirmed non-prospect status?

Wasn't it hamstring in camp, now I heard he has a back injury presently. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 17, 2013, 03:19:45 pm
Judicious trades might be hard when there is little to trade.  Marmol?  Cody Ransom?  Lillibridge?  Soriano?  WE've got so few guys who are age/competence attractive.  Trade game will be tough. 

If Villenueva continues as he has, he might get a decent return, as could Schierholtz and Wood.  Even Rondon might bring back something fairly valuable if he continues strong.  It is true that all are based upon a very small sample size, but then so are the others.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 17, 2013, 04:19:56 pm
Baez: 3-6, HR, 2 RBI, K

Geiger: 3-5, 2B, HR, 4 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_17_dbcafa_clrafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb



Alcantara: 1-1, 3 BB, 4 SB, 2 E

Villanueva: 1-3, HR, 3 RBI, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_17_tenaax_hunaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb



Iowa and Kane County both rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Dave23 on April 17, 2013, 04:49:06 pm
Iowa is in Memphis this weekend, playing at Autozone Park (one of the top minor league stadiums in the country), where, incidentally, someone close to me also played last night...


[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2013, 05:10:19 pm
Baez, over .200!  Don't look back now, buddy!  Two singles doubles his volume of singles thus far. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 17, 2013, 05:14:46 pm
Geiger's got a 10-game hitting streak.  If his Daytona K-rate was routine for him, he'd be a good prospect given his power.  Not likely, but may as well ride it as long as he can. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 17, 2013, 05:27:08 pm
Javier Baez' homer with interesting commentary.  Scroll down a bit to see it.

http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/04/cubs-minors-recap-baez-swings-some-heavy-lumber-video/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/04/cubs-minors-recap-baez-swings-some-heavy-lumber-video/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 17, 2013, 06:55:42 pm
This process of signing middling players, trade them for prospects at the deadline and lose 100 games is going to wear on fans' patience pretty quickly.

Here's the reality: we can all applaud what Theo is trying to do by building through the system.  But putting down the Kool-aid and looking objectively, our system is average - maybe a hair above in total, certainly below average for pitching.  And Theo has to try and build from a system that was dead at all levels when he got here - nothing with the big club with long-term value apart from Castro, nothing much in the minors.  He's made a start, but most of our talent at the minor-league level is years away.

With the new rules and the depth of the problem, we're looking at another 5-6 years until this team is a contender if the administration continues to follow this course.  Are you willing to wait that long?  We're not necessarily going to be so bad that we lose 95-100 games every year, but I don't see any way to turn the team into a legit contender faster than that without spending like the big-market team it is.  Trades won't cut it when you have so little of value to trade.  There's no inherent contradiction between spending big-time on FAs and building a strong farm system - the Yankees and Red Sox certainly did both.  It's only a question of money, and I think we've been given something of a false choice.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 17, 2013, 07:10:55 pm
Are you willing to wait that long?

Yes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 17, 2013, 07:21:00 pm
Forget about championships.  The Cubs need to first figure out how to become a genuine major league franchise.  If we're being honest, the Chicago Cubs are closer to a Low-A team than they are to the Yankees/Giants/Braves/Rangers/Cardinals/Tigers.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 17, 2013, 07:33:51 pm
With the new rules and the depth of the problem, we're looking at another 5-6 years until this team is a contender if the administration continues to follow this course.

The Cubs are likely to be in the playoffs by 2015, and virtually certain to be in the playoffs by 2016, and that will be less likely the result of spending outrageously (such as the 2006-2007 offseason) or the result of absolutely brilliant moves or unrivaled talent evaluation.  It will most likely be the result of laying out a plan to develop from within and to gradually expand the window of opportunity, being fully willing to accept complete failure the first two years.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 17, 2013, 07:36:23 pm
There is virtually zero chance that the Cubs will be in the playoffs in 2015 and not much more chance that they'll be in in 2016.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 17, 2013, 07:37:53 pm
If EVERYTHING goes perfectly, the Cubs may be in the playoffs in 2020.  But even that is unlikely.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 17, 2013, 07:47:31 pm
The Cubs signed Jackson this past winter.  I suspect that they will sign a couple Jackson types or higher this upcoming winter, and then sign a top free agent the following winter.  If they do, they will be a high level team by 2015 even without an influx of minor leaguers at that point.

And the various improvements to the income stream and the increased TV and radio revenues will kick in at the same time.

Right now, it looks very much like most expected two years ago.  They seem to be right on schedule.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 17, 2013, 07:56:36 pm
Right now, it looks very much like most expected two years ago.  They seem to be right on schedule.

It looks like SHOULD have been expected a year ago -- two years ago Hendry was still GM, and even after correcting for that, there are a lot of folks here (and far more among Cub fans generally) quite obviously truly expected things much faster.  Some otherwise sane posters here even seem to have had trouble accepting that the Theocracy wrote off the 2013 season in order to keep to the long term plan.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 17, 2013, 08:23:52 pm
If the Cubs sign two Jackson types or higher this winter (which I doubt) and a top free agent the following (I assume by that you mean one of the top 2 or 3 on the market) which I also doubt, that would probably take them to .500, but high-level?  I don't think so.  Right now the only position players the Cubs have who should be starters for a contender in 2015 are Castro and Rizzo, and I don't see either of them as stars so much as solid regulars.  Garza will likely be gone or a shadow of his old self due to injury.  Jackson will be around, presumably, and maybe Shark will continue to pitch at this level.  But there's not much past that.  You have to hope Appel or Gray stays healthy and develops quickly enough to be an impact pitcher by then, and that Vizcaino comes back as the guy he was before he got hurt. 

In short - too many things have to fall into place for the Cubs to contend by then unless they go all-in as a FA spender.  I certainly don't disagree with the approach of signing 1-2 high level guys per offseason, but I'm skeptical that they're going to be willing to spend even that much.  I just dislike the false notion being propagated that by being major players in the FA market they somehow abandon the goal of building a strong system from within.  The two are by no means mutually exclusive.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on April 17, 2013, 09:33:55 pm
How do you go about building a strong farm system and not sucking with the new CBA?  If you sign top tier free agents your going to lose picks (that is if someone worth a pick even hits the market anymore).  Lose your first one of your first two picks and your draft pool is greatly reduced.  The Red Sox's under Theo super slotted and racked up a lot of compensation picks, things you can't do anymore.  Even the IFA is being replaced by a draft so you can't even make it up there anymore.  It basically comes down to sucking or being reallllly smarter than everyone else out there.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 17, 2013, 09:45:53 pm
Where is Vitters now?

Hamburger College
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 17, 2013, 10:15:01 pm
Jes, thanks for the stats re lead off hitters.

It's mid-April, so there's plenty of time left for guys like Baez and Almora to put hope back into the conversation.

I'm one who believes the Cubs will spend on FAs when it makes sense...it doesn't now.

Keep building the infrastructure and foundation, Cubs!  Remain patient, fans.

JeffH, I'll be most pleased to bet you Cubs will be in the playoffs before 2020.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Robb on April 18, 2013, 06:10:33 am
I agree with Deeg, building through the farm and signing mid-level free agents will not get you there for another 7 or 8 years at best.  The Cubs could start signing top free agents but Ricketts has done nothing but slash payroll since he arrived.  What is his definition of spending big?  It probably isn't the same as the fan base. 

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 18, 2013, 07:29:37 am
The Cubs (and Ricketts) have said that they will sign big free agents when the time is right.  So far, Ricketts has done everything he has said he would.  Vastly improved (and expensive) front office.  Vastly improved (and expensive) scouting and development staff.  Vastly improved (and expensive) computer capabilities.  Vastly increased spending on draft and overseas signings.  And several fairly expensive middle tier free agents (Baker, Villenueva, Jackson).

What reason is there to believe that he won't keep his word on free agents when the time is ripe?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 18, 2013, 08:01:41 am
Right now isn't the time to be spending big. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 18, 2013, 12:52:13 pm
Hayden Simpson signs with the Southern Illinois Miners of the Frontier League

http://www.southernillinoisminers.com/2013/04/miners-sign-cubs-former-first-round-pick-simpson/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chiman on April 18, 2013, 04:45:31 pm
I live in the Evansville Area and go to several Otter games every year. I will make it a point to go and see Simpson pitch this year.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 18, 2013, 04:50:41 pm
What reason is there to believe that he won't keep his word on free agents when the time is ripe?

There is none.  But since it isn't their money, deeg and Robb and other fans like them would like to see the Cubs spend heavily now.  The idea that spending now will not hurt the team later ignores the fact that nearly all big FA contracts become liabilities by the 3rd year, that such contracts would tie the team's hands in the future, and seriously block prospects needing some major league development time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 18, 2013, 07:29:52 pm
Right now isn't the time to be spending big. 

The problem with that, JR, is that it's self-fulfilling.  This organization is so hollow top to bottom that the only way they're getting to get to the time to spend big (by your definition) is by spending big.  Otherwise you're looking at the better part of a decade before you're likely good enough if you try to build solely from within under the new CBA.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 18, 2013, 07:35:18 pm
The problem with that, JR, is that it's self-fulfilling.  This organization is so hollow top to bottom that the only way they're getting to get to the time to spend big (by your definition) is by spending big.  Otherwise you're looking at the better part of a decade before you're likely good enough if you try to build solely from within under the new CBA.

The problem with "spending big" is that, relatively speaking, there's nothing to spend it on.  Teams are so flush with cash nowadays that every two-bit outfit can easily retain their own stars.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2013, 09:38:26 pm
Baez: 2-4, SF, RBI, K

Soler: 1-3, BB, K

Bruno: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_18_tbyafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Iowa postponed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 18, 2013, 09:47:33 pm
While I am glad Soler is back, that was entirely too brief a suspension.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2013, 09:49:07 pm
Amaya: 2-5, 2 2B, 2 K, E

Candelario: 2-5, 2B, E

Vogelbach: 2-5, RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_18_qcsafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 18, 2013, 11:16:54 pm
Alcantara: 3-4, BB, K, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_18_tenaax_hunaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 19, 2013, 05:30:52 am
Arismendy is an OBP/SB machine!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 19, 2013, 09:37:34 am
It's early, but it's interesting to look at some of the walk rates.  The new regime supposedly values plate discipline, although Theo has made it abundantly clear that walks are at most a manifestation, not a target.  Management has had their chance to tell them guys what they need to improve on and focus on to get better and advance.  Walks may be only an imperfect manifestation, but it's the only data that we box-score fans have to use. 

1.  Alcantara has taken more walks.  He's been a bad walker in past, thus far it's good.  As usual when guys start walking more, thus far he's K'ing a lot more.
2.  Bruno has taken more walks.  As a non-power guy, supplementing his average with some walks would help a lot.
3.  Torreyes, although he's played so little it's premature.  Again, as a tiny non-HR guy, he needs to make it as an OBP player. 
4.  Szczur was a hacker two years ago, started walking last year, and has started off OK, too.  When he walked, his K's jumped; that has carried over. 
5.  Same with Ha, he started walking last year and has continued; the K's leaped and have stayed up. 
6.  Contreras was a low-walk guy in short-season.  They're always snowed out, so his sample is worthlessly small.  But so far, so good, he's got some walks.
7.  Baez, of course, has remained consistently anti-walk. 

But seems like there are a lot of guys who might be making some progress in this area.  We'll see how many hold up over months instead of weeks. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 19, 2013, 09:54:30 am
Contreras has started well, in the couple dozen AB's.   

He's 20.  My hope is that he's ready to emerge as a hitter, and that last year, with the conversion to catching, maybe hitting wasn't much of a priority. 

His Boise manager was kind of a gusher about his defensive tools, and made some probably ridiculous allusions to Pudge. 


But thus far, it seems like he's had three passed balls already in only a handful of games, and that he's thrown out about 1 in 15 base stealers.  It's early, but no good indicators defensively. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2013, 03:34:17 pm
Kane County has been rained out again. This is worse than when the team was in Lansing.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 19, 2013, 10:02:06 pm
Baez: 0-4, K, E

Soler: 1-3, 2B, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_19_tbyafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Alcantara: 2-3, SF, 2 RBI, BB, SB, E

Szczur: 2-5, 3B, K

Loosen: 4-4-0-0-2-8   (AA debut)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_19_tenaax_hunaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb

Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_19_nasaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 19, 2013, 10:09:16 pm
Loosen, nice comeback.  Surprised they kept him down long enough to be stretched out to the 75 pitch mark. 

Alcantara's got his average back up to decent.  He's got 7 errors already.   
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 20, 2013, 02:50:20 pm
Kane County is actually playing today.  Pierce Johnson with 6K/1BB/3H through 5, one unearned run enabled by Candelario's 3rd error.  6-1 through 5. 

Jose Arias going to DL, sore elbow. 

Dan Vogelbach now has 15 singles and 2 XBH. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2013, 03:33:53 pm
Vogelbach: 2-4, K

Candelario: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI, K, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_20_qcsafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 20, 2013, 03:39:01 pm
Shoulders is off to a good start.  How soon until the NL can and will add the DH? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 20, 2013, 03:40:59 pm
Szczur is now at 14 runs in 15 games.

The last time the Cubs had a leadoff hitter score even 90 runs in a season was 2007 when Soriano scored 97 runs, with 33 of them on his own HR (Pierre got to 87 in 2006), and before that Eric Young in 2001.

I believe the Theocracy are likely fairly pleased with Szczur so far.

Most seasons the Cubs don't even get 80 runs from their leadoff hitter.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 20, 2013, 03:46:47 pm
Az Phil reported a couple days back that Conway's pitch count was up to 65 pitches, and he looked very good in his outing.  From the games Phil has attended, the Mesa Cubs must be about 3-10. 

McNeil has had a couple of effective games.  Lang horrible (horribly wild)  delaRosa struggling with the bat.  Underwood so-so.  Maples struggled in his game. 

Reggie Golden seems like he's about 1-14 or so in the Phil-reported games.  I think it's safe to say he's a bust. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 20, 2013, 04:17:08 pm
Reggie Golden seems like he's about 1-14 or so in the Phil-reported games.  I think it's safe to say he's another bust. 

Fixed it for you.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2013, 07:24:12 pm
Vogelbach: 2-3, BB, K

Shoulders: 3-3, HR, 3 RBI, PO  ( 1.166 OPS )

Scott: 6-5-3-3-1-4


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_20_qcsafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 20, 2013, 07:50:05 pm
Nice to see Pierce Johnson finally have a decent start.  And I'm not worried about Vogelbach's slugging - that will come.  He's hitting .328 and not striking out much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2013, 07:50:32 pm
Szczur: 2-4, 2B, HR, SF, 3 RBI

Alcantara: 1-4, HR, 3 RBI, BB, 2 K, E

Torreyes: 1-3, SF, RBI, BB    ( 0 K in 25 PA's )


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_20_monaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 20, 2013, 08:06:32 pm
Bruno with 8 K's in last 4 games. 

Alcantara with his 8th error.  I wonder what the highest error rate for a major leaguer has been? 
Last year he had 35 in 80 games.  For a full 162 game big-league season, that would prorate to 71.
This year, he's got 8 in 16 games.  For a full 162 game big-league season, that would prorate to 81! 

I wonder how many big-leaguers have ever gotten to 45 in a single season? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 20, 2013, 08:26:22 pm
I wonder if Sczur might get a sniff of the majors this year, especially if Jackson continues to struggle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 20, 2013, 08:34:47 pm
Speaking of Brett Jackson. What's up with him. Today he pinch hit and it seems like he hasn't started for a while.  Anybody know anything?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 20, 2013, 08:44:31 pm
Back in the 19th century guys made zillions of errors. 

Jackson has an injured toe.  Somebody said he "did something stupid", but didn't elaborate.  He's a pretty injury-prone guy, it seems.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 20, 2013, 09:01:52 pm
Thanks, craig.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 20, 2013, 09:02:54 pm
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_20_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Wells: 6-7-4-4-1-6

Soler: 1-4 2B, 2 RBI, BB, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_20_tbyafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 20, 2013, 09:03:01 pm
Back in the 19th century guys made zillions of errors. 

Jackson has an injured toe.  Somebody said he "did something stupid", but didn't elaborate.  He's a pretty injury-prone guy, it seems.

Back in the 19th Century guys played baseball bare-handed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 20, 2013, 09:15:37 pm
Szczur is now at 16 runs in 16 games, 2nd in the league in runs scored.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on April 21, 2013, 12:07:28 am
Back in the 19th Century guys played baseball bare-handed.

Right, try back-handing in the hole with one of these.

http://www.baseballglovecollector.com/gallery/19th-century/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 21, 2013, 12:12:31 am
Even stuff like that wasn't really standard until the 1890's.  I don't think guys like the Wright Brothers ever used gloves at all.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on April 21, 2013, 01:05:08 am
The top three leaders in career errors:

1. Herman Long, SS, 1889-1904 - 1096 errors in 1875 games played
2. Bill Dahlen, SS/3B, 1891-1911 - 1080 errors in 2444 games
3. James "Deacon" White, C/3B/RF, 1871-1890 - 1018 errors in 1622 games

Oh, and Deacon White will be inducted into the Hall Of Fame this summer.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2013, 03:46:11 pm
Baez came in as a PH: 0-2, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_21_dbcafa_dunafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Vogelbach: 0-3, BB, SB

Shoulders: 2-4, 2B

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_21_peoafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2013, 04:26:03 pm
Something tells me offensive reinforcements will not be coming from Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_21_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 21, 2013, 04:46:39 pm
Szczur: 1-4, 2 RBI, 2 BB, 2 K

Zych: 1-1-3-2-1-0, HB  (8-1/3 IP, 4 BB, 3 K)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_21_monaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2013, 03:48:46 pm
Vogelbach: 2-4, HR, SF, 2 RBI

Candelario: 1-3, 2 BB, K, 2 E


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_22_peoafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 22, 2013, 04:52:38 pm
3 walks for Shoulders. 

Vogelbach's OPS is now up near .800. 

Too bad we can't take Vogelbach's bat and combine it with Baez'z defense and baserunning. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 22, 2013, 07:14:09 pm
I believe for the moment Baez may have reached the .250-OBP mark that has eluded him since he left Peoria. 

Obviously he's never taken any walks, and hard as it is to believe his walk-rate is even lower thus far this year than it was last year. 

But another problem is that his HBP rate is way down.  At Peoria last year he maintained a moderate IsoD because he got hit a lot, but that's gone.  I wonder if he's moved off the plate a little bit or something? Or if some of his HBP were "message" HBP, but as one of the biggest outmakers in the FSL he doesn't provoke any messages anymore? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 22, 2013, 07:16:24 pm
In Ian Stewart's 6th rehab game tonight, he got his first hit. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 22, 2013, 07:35:57 pm
In Ian Stewart's 6th rehab game tonight, he got his first hit. 

He's on fire!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2013, 07:55:54 pm
Baez: 3-5, 2B, 2 RBI, K

Geiger: 3-5, 3 RBI, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_22_dbcafa_dunafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2013, 08:51:54 pm
Alcantara: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, 2 SB

Szczur: 1-4, 2B

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_22_monaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 22, 2013, 09:54:39 pm
Brett Jackson still out:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_22_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 22, 2013, 09:59:40 pm
Alcantara: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, 2 SB

Szczur: 1-4, 2B

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_22_monaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb

4 homers for Alcantara.  He's going to start getting some attention as a Top 50-100 prospect in all of the minors if he keeps showing that kind of power.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 23, 2013, 06:41:33 am
Szczur now with an OBP of .358 and 18 runs scored in 18 games.  OBP and runs scored are the key stats for Szczur.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 23, 2013, 03:04:10 pm
For those who are feeling really down about the major league team, and having concerns about the future (is there anyone that doesn't include?) ... here's a little medicinal encouragement from CubsDen.
http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/04/cubs-young-prospects-learning-to-walk/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/04/cubs-young-prospects-learning-to-walk/)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 23, 2013, 03:17:33 pm
For those who are feeling really down about the major league team, and having concerns about the future (is there anyone that doesn't include?) ... here's a little medicinal encouragement from CubsDen.
http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/04/cubs-young-prospects-learning-to-walk/ (http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2013/04/cubs-young-prospects-learning-to-walk/)
Oh.  You said medicinal encouragement.  I thought they were Johnny Walker coupons.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2013, 04:14:26 pm
Stewart: 0-4, 2 K, E  (2-24, 10 K)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_23_iowaaa_mrbaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Kane County surprisingly rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2013, 04:31:23 pm
Thanks, Ron.  That was kind of interesting, although obviously the samples this year are small.  I still wonder, though.  CubsDen seems to expect that taking more walks reflects an improvement that will result in both improved OBP and improved IsoP.  Win-Win. 

But I still think that's a mixed deal, and while it sometimes works that way, it's hardly normative.  Certainly swinging at junk is bad for everything:  average, OBP, walk-rates, K-rates, power, absolutely everything.  So if laying off of junk was a matter of a coach realizing it's bad and telling a player, bad-ball swinging would have disappeared with Ty Cobb.  Hopefully Theo's video games will help guys get better at pitch recognition/response, and hopefully better coaching will help them as well.   

But for a lot of guys, the bump in OBP when they start taking more walks is limited, because when walks go up, K's go up and BA goes down.  And for a lot of guys, the attempt to be more selective and take more walks reduces rather than improves their real-game power output. 

I'm hopeful in the Szczur and Ha cases, and with Torreyes and Alcantara, that it will be different.  That they got started early enough, and have enough innate ability, that they can walk and grind but still hit and hit with some relative power.  I think that Almora will be a very interesting case.  Supposedly such a good hitter with such good recognize/response ability that theoretically he ought to benefit. 

Baez has certainly been a fascinating case thus far.  Certainly no evidence to date that the coaching or management "way" is making any progress there. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 23, 2013, 04:34:20 pm
I sincerely hope they leave Stewart at Iowa until his performance there is better than Valbuena's in the majors.

But what is happening with Vitters while Stewart is stinking up Iowa?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2013, 06:36:32 pm
Vitters is injured.  Bad back.  It was his hamstring in camp. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 23, 2013, 06:37:29 pm
It was his bat in August and September....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 23, 2013, 09:08:08 pm
Baez: 0-3, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_23_dbcafa_dunafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Szczur: 1-3, BB, SB

Rosscup: 1-1-0-0-0-3   (16 K in 9 IP)

McNutt: 1-3-3-3-2-0, BS

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_23_monaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on April 23, 2013, 10:23:16 pm
"Cubs way" won't work perfectly...of course, nothing does.

The key is that some guys will improve and the organization will as well.

It will take time. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 23, 2013, 11:18:56 pm
Rosscup has pitched 9 innings thus far.  In 2 appearances covering 3 of those innings, he had no K's. 

But in the other 6 innings, he's scored 16 K's in those 6 innings. 

Will be interesting to see how the year unfolds for him, and to get some more info on his stuff. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 24, 2013, 07:54:30 am
Rosscup has pitched 9 innings thus far.  In 2 appearances covering 3 of those innings, he had no K's. 

But in the other 6 innings, he's scored 16 K's in those 6 innings. 

Will be interesting to see how the year unfolds for him, and to get some more info on his stuff. 

I wonder if he was trying something different in the two outings with no K's.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 24, 2013, 08:32:34 am
Rosscup has pitched 9 innings thus far.  In 2 appearances covering 3 of those innings, he had no K's. 

But in the other 6 innings, he's scored 16 K's in those 6 innings. 

Will be interesting to see how the year unfolds for him, and to get some more info on his stuff. 

I've become really really skeptical about minor league relief prospects.  Just about all of our more famous pure relief prospects like Francis Beltran, Scott Chiasson, John Gaub, Jeff Beliveau, Scott Maine, Rocky Cherry, Blake Parker, Marcos Mateo, Justin Berg, David Cales, etc. have bombed in the majors or bombed even before then.  Unless you're utterly dominant like Craig Kimbrel in terms of both stuff and results, I'm not even really sure there's such a thing as a true relief prospect anymore. 

Really the only successful relief pitchers the Cubs have had come from the farm are failed or converted starting pitching prospects like Carlos Marmol, Sean Marshall, James Russell, Kyle Farnsworth, Michael Wuertz, Will Ohman, and Scott Downs.  If you're looking to fill future bullpen spots, those are mostly the types of prospects you need to be looking at - B and C grade minor league starting prospects.  Minor league relievers have not been very successful in becoming good major league relievers, no matter how good their minor league stats look.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 24, 2013, 08:34:25 am
You can pretty much put minor league relief stats in the same category as Boise stats as far as I'm concerned. : )
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 24, 2013, 08:48:11 am
True.  Usually a guy is in relief rather than rotation because he's short on fastball, control, repertoire, size, experience, or health. 

If you're too slow or too wild, those always catch you in the majors. 

I don't know why Rosscup is in relief.  But I think his move there was prompted by injury.  Don't know what his health issue was, (did he have TJ in 2011?) or how well it's been resolved, or whether his arm will fall apart if he pitches more.  (He's still been basically on a 3-day schedule.) 

But last summer there was talk of touching 95 (or more?).  A lefty who works at 92-93 and has a knockout slider, IF the control was decent and IF the health stayed, that guy could bounce around in the majors for some years.  Hope he can stay healthy.     

A guy like Burke, he's a late starter, plus he's been set back by injury.  I expect there isn't the talent or the time to really gear him for rotation.  But in relief, I think he might still have a chance if he can fully recover from the injury. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 24, 2013, 09:00:27 am
Quote
But last summer there was talk of touching 95 (or more?).  A lefty who works at 92-93 and has a knockout slider, IF the control was decent and IF the health stayed, that guy could bounce around in the majors for some years.  Hope he can stay healthy.   

True, although that doesn't make his scouting report a whole lot different than guys like John Gaub, Scott Maine, or Jeff Beliveau either.  Then again most prospects fail to begin with, so if Rosscup's the one who's successful, I guess getting 1 out of 4 isn't bad.  Maybe you build a group of about 10 relief prospects with that kind of profile, and if 1 or 2 of them become competent major league middle relievers, that's a very good success rate.  Unfortunately we haven't really met even that benchmark yet.

I guess for me, though, he's going to have to show an awful lot to make him all that distinguishable from the likes of Gaub, Maine, and Beliveau.  Maybe he'll strike out 110 in relief this year and he'll be consistently clocked at 95-97.  That might be pretty interesting.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 24, 2013, 09:01:56 am
Az Phil reports that Maples pitched 3.1 innings in an intrasquad game with no walks.  Conway also seems to be holding up fine physically.  Rosario keeps pitching, although ineffectively.  Leal, the kid we got for Campana, seems to be doing fine.  Boise could have a nice group of pitchers with Underwood, Blackburn, Maples, McNeil, possibly Conway (although I wonder if he'll go to Kane before Boise opens).  Maybe Prieto? 

Phil said that Burke pitched.  McKirihan (sp?) walked off in pain after a few pitches. 

The Mesa group seems to have almost no offense.  In the bunch of XST games that Phil has touched on, I think they usually score 0-1-2 runs per game, maybe one report with more than 3 runs scored.  Dunston might be interesting, or Baez or perhaps by virtue of defense Penalver.  But not a lot of interesting or productive hitters there. 

No sign of life from the big-dollar sign of Latin guys from two summers back.  Acosta, Malava (sp?), they seem like nice-try money down the chute. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 24, 2013, 09:08:48 am
Actually if you look at where our major league bullpen is now with one good competent reliever in Russell and the rest of the bullpen consisting of castoffs (Camp, Gregg, Bowden, and Loe), a guy we want to get rid of (Marmol), and a Rule 5 guy, that about says all that needs to be said about our farm's poor success rate in developing relievers.

It'd certainly be nice if the new administration could somehow do a better job with guys like Zach Rosscup, Rafael Dolis, Alberto Cabrera, Tony Zych, etc. than the previous administration.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 24, 2013, 09:58:28 am
That also speaks to the success in developing pitchers of any kind.  Russell is one effective reliever developed; Samardz is the only effective starter developed.  Sean Marshall was developed and traded.  We just haven't been producing good pitchers of any kind. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 24, 2013, 10:37:46 am
That also speaks to the success in developing pitchers of any kind.  Russell is one effective reliever developed; Samardz is the only effective starter developed.  Sean Marshall was developed and traded.  We just haven't been producing good pitchers of any kind. 


Not recently.  But the Cubs did develop Prior, Wood, Zambrano, Cruz, Marmol, and were involved in the development of a few others who were traded before they matured in the majors.

And my belief is that the team's failure to develop much in the last 8 years is its effort to buy a contending team instead of developing or drafting/signing one (I am using "signing" here to refer to international prospects and not signings of major league FA).  The focus, energy, effort, staffing and budget moved from acquiring players who might develop in the years ahead to the much more expensive signing of players who have reached FA are are either at their prime or just beyond their prime, but either way are going to soon start declining.

I know davep will insist that good management can effectively multi-task and can handle both assembling a major league team capable of immediately competing and put together or maintain a strong minor league system developing a steady flow of major league talent.... but there are few teams which have been able to do both effectively at the same time, particularly when the major league team had gotten as bad as the Cubs were at the end of 2006 and the primary goal is to IMMEDIATELY get the team to the major league level... and the budget is being tightened for prospect acquisition.

But there is no disagreement that the Cubs have not been producing good pitchers of any kind for a few years, though it does appear there is reason to expect that to change in the years ahead.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on April 24, 2013, 11:36:10 am
Where's Scoop?  She said she was in here!  Scoops are very helpful on the farm...shovel grain.  Shovel manure. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 24, 2013, 03:35:45 pm
Tennessee the only team in action today.


Alcantara: 2-4, 2B, RBI, BB, SB

Zych: 2-1/3 -2-2-2-2-0   ( 6 BB / 3 K, 11 IP )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_24_monaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 24, 2013, 04:04:40 pm
AJ morris, former surgery guy that we trade Gorzelanny for, had a really good stats year last year.  I'd hoped he might emerge this year as a pretty interesting prospect. 

He's been off to a blah start.  Today he came out to pitch an inning, and the box score/recap shows that he was replaced by Zych before facing a batter.  I think that suggest reinjury.  Too bad for him. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 24, 2013, 08:06:47 pm
Arismendy!!! OBP/SB machine! Now featuring power!
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on April 24, 2013, 08:16:24 pm
If they were any sign whatsoever Alcantera wasn't excruciatingly bad defensively everywhere he's played, I might start to consider him a legit prospect.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 24, 2013, 09:04:51 pm
The report from Daytona last year was that Alcantara made lots of plays in the field but committed a ton of throwing errors. So there may be hope that he can be good with some adjustments.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 24, 2013, 09:12:55 pm
He'll probably work his way out of his defensive miscues eventually just like Castro has.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 24, 2013, 09:29:52 pm
Az Phil says that after 27 PA each in XST:
Dunston 391/481/462
Golden:  050/259/100

Said that Conway-Underwood-Maples-McNeil-Blackburn clearly seem to be standing out as the prospective Boise starters. 

Said the delaRosa looks like a smooth, natural SS.  (When signed, the assumption was 2B.)  Phil compared him to Marco Hernandez.  I think that's a compliment (defense), but perhaps also a criticism?   (offense). 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2013, 09:19:13 pm
Baez: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, 2 K, PO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_25_lakafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Torreyes: 3-3, 2B, 3B, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_25_penaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Vogelbach: 0-4, BB, SB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_25_kccafx_ftwafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 25, 2013, 10:18:49 pm
Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_25_iowaaa_omaaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 25, 2013, 11:17:05 pm
Interesting night.  Watkins with 4 walks.  That's probably not the Theo way; he must be trying to walk. 

Beeler 15-0 GO/AO.   He still doesn't K anybody, but he's pitching better.  I wonder how he'll hold up over the summer.  A year or two ago he was viewed as an interesting possibility, but then he kind of hit AA, wasn't good, and stayed not good with little hint of progress.  But now I wonder if he has made some progress? 

Nice to see Torreyes with some hits and some XBH. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on April 25, 2013, 11:25:38 pm
Interesting night.  Watkins with 4 walks.  That's probably not the Theo way; he must be trying to walk. 

And 2 Ks. 6 PAs without putting ball in play.

Watkins now with 20 Walks and 22 Ks in 62 official ABs.

Wow, must be seeing a lot of pitches per AB.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 26, 2013, 07:43:04 am
Stats do not necessarily indicate whether or not a player is pursuing "Theo's Way".  Theo wants players to only swing at pitches they are able to hit.  If they see pitches like that early in the count, they could get no walks.  If they never see pitches like that, they will get all walks.

I know of no stat that tells us whether swings are done on pitches that they should or should not swing at.  Only scouting can tell us that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 26, 2013, 07:49:25 am
Watkins doesn't have the best stealing percentage (1 for 5).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 26, 2013, 08:07:31 am
And 2 Ks. 6 PAs without putting ball in play.

Watkins now with 20 Walks and 22 Ks in 62 official ABs.

Wow, must be seeing a lot of pitches per AB.

I'm still not sure it's the healthiest thing in the world to force feed guys who don't have much power to walk at that kind of level. 

Pitchers are supposed to avoid walking guys like Watkins.  If a good speed/low power guy like him is walking at that kind of rate and having an elevated strikeout rate to go along with it, that sounds more like he's trying too hard to draw walks instead of letting them be the natural byproduct of having a good approach to the plate, as Theo likes to talk about.

He may have a .415 OBP right now.  Still, he's probably not going to keep that up if he isn't hitting for average, and walk heavy OBP's are not nearly as desirable as hit heavy OBP's.  He's probably someone who actually needs to be walking a little less.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 26, 2013, 10:59:40 am
...Theo wants players to only swing at pitches they are able to hit.  ...  If they never see pitches like that, they will get all walks.....

So, Watkins may be getting lots of walks and very few hits because there are few pitches that he's able to hit.  I think that's probably true. 

Thoughts:
1.  Walking is nice, but it still comes down to the hitting.  If the only reason a guy takes walks is because he's a bad hitter (which maybe the Watkins and Jackson and Reggie Golden situations....), you still don't end up with good players.  If you can't hit very well, you'll not be a good player. 
2.  If guys can hit pitches they like early in the count, as is true for Castro and Almora and formerly for Vitters, that may mean that hitters don't walk. 

Perhaps it comes down to "Hitters don't walk and walkers don't hit".  ("Winners don't quit and quitters don't win.")   Maybe either way, it ensures that your team will be near the pits for OBP if you don't have guys who both can hit and who also take some walks besides.   

Walking is good in and of itself.  Baserunners are needed to score runs.  I'm still not sure the "walks are just a byproduct" philosophy is necessarily optimal.  I think there should be some degree and some situations in which walks are actually a target. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 26, 2013, 12:23:52 pm
The goal of getting ahead in the count is different for hitters with some power vs. singles hitters.  The power hitter is looking for a cookie that he can crush (and thus should generally be hacking on 2-0 or 3-1 counts).  Singles hitters have an increased chance of getting a hit on 2-0 or 3-1 if the pitch is a cookie, but the reward is not so great vs. the risk (making an out).  Thus, taking in that count often makes sense.  It requires the pitcher to throw two (or more) consecutive strikes to avoid the walk.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 26, 2013, 08:36:45 pm
Theo wants players to only swing at pitches they are able to hit.  If they see pitches like that early in the count, they could get no walks.  If they never see pitches like that, they will get all walks.

Or if they never see pitches they are able to hit and don't swing, they will K a lot... a WHOLE lot.

But I think you have slightly oversimplified what Theo wants hitters to do.  It is probably right that he wants Cub hitters to only swing at pitches they can drive well early in the count, but I suspect that once a hitter gets behind 0-2, 1-2 or 2-2 in the count, Theo would like Cub hitters to swing at anything in the strike zone, even if not a pitch the hitter is able to drive or one he stands a good chance of getting a hit on.

The approach Theo has talked about seems to be essentially the approach Ted Williams advocated in his book The Science of hitting.

I know of no stat that tells us whether swings are done on pitches that they should or should not swing at.  Only scouting can tell us that.

Actually BA and OPS both would do a decent job of indicating whether a hitter is swinging at pitches that they should or should not swing at.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 26, 2013, 09:16:15 pm
Baez: 2-4, 2B, 2 RBI, K, 2 E

Geiger: 2-4, 3 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_26_lakafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Szczur: 1-4, BB, K

Cabrera: 6-3-1-1-3-6

AJ Morris seems okay: 1-1-1-1-1-1


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_26_penaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 26, 2013, 09:22:03 pm
Szczur has scored 20 runs in 20 games.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 26, 2013, 10:14:53 pm
Jackson: 0-4, BB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_26_iowaaa_omaaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Vogelbach: 0-5, E

Johnson: 5-2/3 -5-1-0-2-7

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_26_kccafx_ftwafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ticohans on April 27, 2013, 09:25:55 am
Torreyes with a crazy awesome start despite the aggressive promotion to TN. Hitting .333 in 36 AB's with 7 BB's and 1 K.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 27, 2013, 02:46:39 pm
Back-to-back quality games for Johnson. 

Pretty ugly game last night for Candelario.  No hits, 3K's, 2 errors, don't think he'll have many worse than that. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 27, 2013, 03:12:42 pm
Torreyes with a crazy awesome start despite the aggressive promotion to TN. Hitting .333 in 36 AB's with 7 BB's and 1 K.

I likes me some Torreyes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2013, 06:55:57 pm
Vogelbach: 1-2  (PH for in 5th)

Scott: 6-7-2-2-2-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_27_kccafx_ftwafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Smokies rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2013, 08:44:06 pm
Az Phil:

Quote
Dillon Maples got the start for the Cubs and allowed one run on two hits and two walks in three innings of work (50 pitches). He also struck out five and threw a wild pitch. His hammer-curve was virtually unhittable (as it usually is), and he was able to command his fastball somewhat better today than in previous outings. 


http://www.thecubreporter.com/04272013/eric-aybar-helps-rally-angels-past-cubs-diablo-park
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 27, 2013, 09:07:48 pm
Baez: 1-3, 2B, BB, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_27_lakafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2013, 12:16:14 am
Jackson: 1-4, 2B, RBI, K

Watkins: 2-4, 3B, RBI, K


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_27_iowaaa_omaaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: bitterman on April 28, 2013, 10:44:02 am
19Ks in 51ABs for Jackson .... Ive written him off ...
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2013, 04:36:00 pm
Rock Shoulders was #7 on BA's Hot Sheet this week:

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/prospect-hot-sheet-april-26-jesse-biddles-16-strikeouts-stand-out/


Quote
Ben (Long Island): Would Rock Shoulders be on your radar if his name was Rick Smith (or something equally benign)?

Ben Badler: He's second in the Midwest League in slugging and fourth in OBP. He's no slouch.


Quote
bardin (San Diego): Ronald Torreyes is having a decent start in AA, where he is young for his age. but... he is only 5'9'' and weights 140 pounds. Does he have any sort of realistic chance to stick in the bigs?

Ben Badler: Yes. People are sleeping on him after last year. Look, you're probably not going to get more than 5-10 home runs per year out of the guy, but his hand-eye coordination and knack for squaring up the baseball is remarkable, so I think he's going to hit and he's a pretty good defender at second base too. He's underrated.


Quote
Drew (Chicago): update on juan carlos paniagua Visa issues?

Ben Badler: Still waiting to get things sorted out, last I checked.


http://www.baseballamerica.com/chat/?1366995901
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2013, 05:09:00 pm
Watkins: 2-6, 3B, SB, K

Jackson: 1-5, HR, 3 RBI, BB, 0 K

Stewart: 0-3, RBI, 2 BB, 3 K, E   (3-33, 13 K)


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_28_iowaaa_omaaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Tennessee DH rained out, Kane County rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 28, 2013, 05:25:22 pm
Brett Jackson with his first HR of the season, and is it also his first game without a K?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 28, 2013, 05:32:37 pm
Ron, it doesn't matter now.  Jackson is officially a bust.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 28, 2013, 05:34:50 pm
bardin (San Diego): Ronald Torreyes is having a decent start in AA, where he is young for his age. but... he is only 5'9'' and weights 140 pounds. Does he have any sort of realistic chance to stick in the bigs?

Ben Badler: Yes. People are sleeping on him after last year. Look, you're probably not going to get more than 5-10 home runs per year out of the guy, but his hand-eye coordination and knack for squaring up the baseball is remarkable, so I think he's going to hit and he's a pretty good defender at second base too. He's underrated.

He was, after all, the key to the Sean Marshall trade.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 28, 2013, 07:46:24 pm
Baez: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI, K, 2 E (10)

Geiger: 1-1, 2B, 3 BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_28_pbcafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on April 28, 2013, 08:09:11 pm
If Baez is going to move Castro off of SS, he's going to have to do a bit better defensively than he seems to be doing so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2013, 04:05:20 am
Quote
Baez crushed a home run – his fifth of the season – down the left-field line in the third inning to make it a 4-1 Daytona lead. But it was a seventh-inning, two-strike single up the middle that Keller raved about afterward.

“This level is about learning how to hit,” Keller said. “I thought the best at-bat for (Baez) was the two-strike, line-drive base hit up the middle, because he stayed inside the ball and put it in play. That was really neat to see that he made some adjustments.”


Another note: Ryan Searle is on the DL with a strained elbow ligament that he will have to rehab.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on April 29, 2013, 01:12:58 pm
Daytona manager benches Cubs' prospect Jorge Soler

Quote
Dave Keller is about as old school as they come, and the former Cubs coach and current manager of the team’s Class A Daytona affiliate didn’t like what he saw from top prospect Jorge Soler.

So Soler became one of the first prominent examples of the Cubs Way, finding himself on  the bench Sunday for failing to run hard.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/chi-chicago-daytona-soler-20130429,0,5178532.story (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/cubs/chi-chicago-daytona-soler-20130429,0,5178532.story)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on April 29, 2013, 01:15:05 pm
Soler hasn't been too impressive in the "intangible" category.  Hopefully, the tangibles will more than outweigh that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 29, 2013, 03:02:49 pm
Great.  I hope they treat every prospect in the same way.  Let them learn before they make it to the majors.

What other things have you heard about Soler's intangibles?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 29, 2013, 04:04:47 pm
The two other things I've gotten on his intangibles was that he was whining at an umpires call in one game (the ump kind of told him to be quiet, and he hit a HR on the ensuing pitch.)  The other was that he got mad at a guy, lost his cool, and ran at the other dugout brandishing a bat. 

So that would be two serious intangibles demerits, and a small third negative.  Too bad. 

Hopefully he'll start to hit soon.  He hasn't been hitting much since the suspension.  He's hitting .184 since April 10. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2013, 04:34:09 pm
Torreyes: 1-3, SB, E

Szczur: 1-3, PO, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_29_penaax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Hendricks: 6-1-0-0-1-8

Villanueva: 0-2, 2 K  (OPS under .600)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_29_penaax_tenaax_2&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cubsin on April 29, 2013, 05:02:32 pm
That's the wrong boxscore for the second game. Jae-Hoon Ha hit a 3-run pinch-hit, walkoff home run in the bottom of the seventh to win it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2013, 05:32:09 pm
Quote
That's the wrong boxscore for the second game.

I went back and fixed it.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2013, 05:46:16 pm
Almora returned to action today in Mesa going 1-5 with a triple.

http://www.thecubreporter.com/04292013/almora-vitters-lead-cubs-victory-over?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TCRfeed+%28The+Cub+Reporter%29
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2013, 05:50:30 pm
Almora better be good because the kid the who went 7th and who was linked to the Cubs pre-draft, Archie Bradley, has been dominant ( 1.26 ERA, 28-2/3 IP, 10 BB, 43 K at High-A ).
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 29, 2013, 06:25:23 pm
Bradley was 2011, picked before the Cubs had a choice.  Cubs settled for Baez. 

Wasn't Max fried the guy who came after Almora, and didn't Kane County just face him?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 29, 2013, 06:28:44 pm
..  Hendricks: 6-1-0-0-1-8  ....

I like this version of Hendricks who's been 17K/2BB/13IP over his last two starts.  Better than the Hendricks we saw in his first three starts, or at Daytona. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2013, 06:43:50 pm
I saw Bradley's 2011 stats and still thought he was picked last year. Oh well, at least he went prior to the Cubs' pick. Makes me feel better.


Quote
and didn't Kane County just face him?


Yes they did. He's over a K per inning. Solid numbers so far.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2013, 07:35:20 pm
Vogelbach: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, K

Shoulders: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_29_kccafx_lcoafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 29, 2013, 08:47:21 pm
Brett Jackson with a homer, a walk and a strike out so far today.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on April 29, 2013, 08:53:00 pm
vogelbach with a home run in the first game tonight, and another one so far in the second game.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2013, 09:21:07 pm
Baez: 1-3, HBP, E

Geiger: 1-2, HR, RBI, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_29_pbcafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 29, 2013, 10:13:29 pm
Watkins: 2-4, RBI, BB, K

Jackson: 1-4, HR, 2 RBI, BB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_29_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Amaya: 0-3, 3 K

Vogelbach: 1-3, HR, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_29_kccafx_lcoafx_2&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 29, 2013, 10:41:18 pm
Vogelbach: 1-3, HR, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_29_kccafx_lcoafx_2&t=g_box&sid=milb

It wasn't long ago that a few here seemed mily concerned that Vogelbach had not started hitting HR yet this season.  3 now in the last week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on April 30, 2013, 12:13:43 am
I think he still has only one double.  More just a curiousity than anything.  He hasn't walked all that super much.  Perhaps if he hits some more HR's, pitchers will worry more and walk him more.  His splits sure look great, though.  4 HR in April, the coldest worst-hitting month of the year, and his K's are quite good.  Very promising hitter, that's for sure. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on April 30, 2013, 06:44:48 am
He hasn't walked all that super much.  Perhaps if he hits some more HR's, pitchers will worry more and walk him more.  His splits sure look great, though.  4 HR in April, the coldest worst-hitting month of the year, and his K's are quite good.  Very promising hitter, that's for sure. 

He had 23 walks in 143 AB at Boise, and was a heavy walker in HS, so my guess is you are looking more at the result of a small sample size than anything else.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 30, 2013, 02:55:52 pm
Quote
Daytona Beach, FL - The Florida State League announced, Monday, that Daytona Cubs shortstop Javier Baez has been named Florida State League Player of the Week for the week ending April 28th.

In six games, Baez (20) batted .435 (10-23), with two home runs and three doubles. Baez also drove in six runs and scored five times. The Bayamon, Puerto Rico native slugged .826 during the week.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 30, 2013, 02:56:07 pm
Jackson: 0-4, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_30_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2013, 08:12:37 pm
Bringing up Randy Wells' retirement today sort of reminds me of what might have been one of the real turning points of the MacHendry regime - the 2002 Draft.

The Cubs had four first round picks, 8 of the first 96 picks, and 10 picks through Round 4.  With this bounty of picks, the best the Cubs could do was a couple of seasons apiece from Randy Wells and Rich Hill.

Meanwhile between picks #21 and #96, the Cubs whiffed on the opportunities to land players such as Matt Cain, Joey Votto, Jon Lester, Brian McCann, Curtis Granderson, Josh Johnson, and Jonathan Broxton, along with several other respectable role player types.  If the Cubs had managed to land someone like Cain, Votto, or Lester with one of those first or second round picks (or maybe gotten really lucky and landed two of them), that definitely could have made a big difference in how things eventually played out for the Cubs during the Hendry era.

That draft was definitely a big wasted opportunity, and in hindsight, it revealed that the Hendry/Fleita/Stockstill scouting and player development team wasn't nearly as good as advertised at the time.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2013, 08:15:55 pm
Best Cubs players taken during the 2002-2005 drafts:

1. Sean Marshall
2. Randy Wells
3. Rich Hill
4. Jerry Blevins
5. Casey McGehee
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2013, 08:21:20 pm
Best Cubs players taken during the 2006-2010 drafts:  (Wilken era)

1. Jeff Samardzija
2. Darwin Barney
3. James Russell
4. Andrew Cashner
5. Tyler Colvin
6. Josh Donaldson
7. Josh Harrison
8. Steve Clevenger


Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on April 30, 2013, 08:53:13 pm
I'd move Cashner to #2 on the list.  Despite his injury issues he's doing well for the Padres this year and netted the Cubs Rizzo.  You also have to point out that Wilken has getting shorted on the draft budget until 2011 to try and prop up the major league payroll.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 30, 2013, 09:08:30 pm
Vogelbach: 4-6, HR, 2 RBI

Contreras: 2-4, HR, RBI, BB, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_30_kccafx_lcoafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 30, 2013, 09:10:29 pm
Dan Vogelbach is one of the very best non-prospects around.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 30, 2013, 09:17:54 pm
Dan Vogelbach fits perfectly with the Cubs.  They finally draft an impact hitter for the first time since who knows when...and it's a complete tease, because he can only DH. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 30, 2013, 09:23:18 pm
Dan Vogelbach is no more "impact hitter" than Robin Jennings or Pedro Valdes.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2013, 09:25:30 pm
Quote
You also have to point out that Wilken has getting shorted on the draft budget until 2011 to try and prop up the major league payroll.

I think he was hindered in 2007 when he took Vitters and took a bunch of college seniors in Rounds 6-8.  (Although he didn't pull the trigger on drafting Matt Moore in time, which he apparently at least had the money to do.)

But in 2006, he was able to sign Samardzija for $5-6 million or whatever it was to get him away from football.  He had $500K to sign Logan Watkins in 2008, $1 million+ to sign Matt Szcuzr and $500K to sign Ben Wells in 2010.   

He wasn't totally broke in his budgets anyway.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on April 30, 2013, 09:27:26 pm
Tim Wilken is a joke.  Always has been, always will be.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 30, 2013, 09:29:47 pm
So we have an argument about how Vogelbach is going to be a part of the Cubs' futility.  I say he might be an impact bat who has zero chance of ever playing for a National League team.  You say he's a non-prospect who looks good against inferior pitching.

I think we can both agree...the Cubs will end up getting nothing at the major league level out of Vogelbach.  Whether we watch him flame out or we watch him rake for an AL team for years, it'll be a wasted draft pick from the Cubs perspective.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on April 30, 2013, 09:31:27 pm
Baez: 1-5, 2B, 2 RBI, K, E

Soler: 1-4, 2B, RBI, K, HBP

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_04_30_pbcafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Smokies off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2013, 09:31:48 pm
Quote
Tim Wilken is a joke.  Always has been, always will be.

I have to admit, I think Wilken's had a little too much post "getting kicked upstairs" spin coming out lately, like not being allowed to draft Jarrod Parker, just missing out on Tim Lincecum, and not having money to sign the guys he wanted (guys like Samardzija and Szczur excepted, obviously), than I really care to be reading.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2013, 09:50:58 pm
Wilken does deserve all the credit in the world for drafting Samardzija.  That will probably be his best lasting legacy as scouting director. 

And hopefully drafting a guy attractive enough to be dealt for Anthony Rizzo and some of the guys in the 2011 class like Baez and Vogelbach will be right up there.

Still, if you look at the team we have on the field right now, he just didn't get us enough talent.  We have Samardzija, Rizzo, Barney, and Russell with his fingerprints on them, and that's about it.  Unfortunately, we needed Wilken to be a little better than that.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 30, 2013, 10:02:30 pm
Hayden Simpson

Case closed.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on April 30, 2013, 10:29:18 pm
I think he was hindered in 2007 when he took Vitters and took a bunch of college seniors in Rounds 6-8.  (Although he didn't pull the trigger on drafting Matt Moore in time, which he apparently at least had the money to do.)

But in 2006, he was able to sign Samardzija for $5-6 million or whatever it was to get him away from football.  He had $500K to sign Logan Watkins in 2008, $1 million+ to sign Matt Szcuzr and $500K to sign Ben Wells in 2010.   

He wasn't totally broke in his budgets anyway.

In 2006 Colvin was signed for $1.475 million.  Until the 22nd pick in the draft nobody signed for less.  The Cubs also didn't have a 2-4th round pick.  The Cubs didn't sign anybody from rounds 6-10 for more than $155,000 and most of Shark's money came in the MLB contract so it was spread out.

in 2007 Vitters got the 6th highest bonus in the first round, even though he was the 3rd pick.  The Cubs did spend $500,00 over slot on him though (the lowest overslot of the first 3 picks.

2008-2009 in the first 10 rounds the Cubs were pretty close to the bonuses of the surrounding picks.  2009 the Cubs even super-slotted Raley in the top 10 rounds. 

2010- Simpson signed for about $600,00 less that the 2 picks around him.  Golden had the 10 highest bonus in the 2nd round, so he was a slight super slot.  Szczur signed for $100,000 (below slot) and didn't get his big pay day until the next year to keep him out of the NFL draft.  The Cubs didn't sign Ivan DeJesus in the 6th round and Wells got $530,000.  If you take the low amount for Simpson and not signing DeJesus that gives you the extra money for Wells and Golden.

If the Wilken didn't have his hands tied by the powers that be, I think you would have seen more drafts like 2011 than the other years.  If they had done that the Cubs would be in a lot better shape right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on April 30, 2013, 10:45:14 pm
Here's the one Wilken really did "just miss" that would have made Cub legacy a lot better.  From a BA article on the Tampa Bay scout who signed Matt Moore . . .

Quote
During the draft, the Cubs inquired of Moore whether he’d be willing to sign in the eighth round. Because of the relationship Powell had built with the Moores, the family tipped him off and Tampa Bay grabbed Moore with the first choice that round, two picks ahead of Chicago. He signed for $115,000.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/for-scout-jack-powell-lightning-struck-twice-13217/ (http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/for-scout-jack-powell-lightning-struck-twice-13217/)

Too bad Wilken didn't have that conversation with Moore in the 6th or 7th rounds when we drafted college seniors Casey Lambert and Ty Wright instead. 

I have to admit, that one is still painful for me to read.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on April 30, 2013, 10:49:56 pm
A lot of things are painful to read about the Cubs.  I don't think Wilken is without blame and didn't screw things up, but I do think he was limited in what he could do.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: brjones on April 30, 2013, 10:50:18 pm
Let's be honest, though...the Cubs could've drafted Trout, McCutchen, Price, and Verlander...and they would've turned them into a flame out, a fourth outfielder, a torn labrum, and a middle reliever.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on April 30, 2013, 10:55:49 pm
A lot of things are painful to read about the Cubs.  I don't think Wilken is without blame and didn't screw things up, but I do think he was limited in what he could do.

I think you're letting him off the hook.  He's just as responsible for the current state of the Cubs as Jim Hendry, Andy MacPhail and Oneri Fleita.  Honestly, I don't know why the Theocracy is keeping him, unless they just want an "old school" voice around to have some input.  At least he doesn't wear those stupid Gary Hughes Hawaiian shirts.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Deeg on May 01, 2013, 02:54:35 am
Dan Vogelbach fits perfectly with the Cubs.  They finally draft an impact hitter for the first time since who knows when...and it's a complete tease, because he can only DH. 

I think it's preposterous to assume Vogelbach can't play 1B at the major-league level - plenty of scouts think he can.  If you want to question whether he's going to hit enough to make Rizzo expendable, sure.  If you doubt he can play LF, sure (though it's too early to say).  But "only DH"?  Nonsense.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 01, 2013, 03:04:45 am
Dan Vogelbach fits perfectly with the Cubs.  They finally draft an impact hitter for the first time since who knows when...and it's a complete tease, because he can only DH. 

Yeah, and I was supposedly exaggerating when I pointed out that some posters here had such a foolish position....
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2013, 05:38:22 am
Some early reviews of Vogelbach's defense this year have not been kind.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ron on May 01, 2013, 07:25:28 am
I think we can both agree...the Cubs will end up getting nothing at the major league level out of Vogelbach.  Whether we watch him flame out or we watch him rake for an AL team for years, it'll be a wasted draft pick from the Cubs perspective.

Well, at least that's settled. Should probably let Theo know so he can take appropriate action (since neither he nor any of his team seems to have come to this realization yet)
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2013, 08:08:19 am
Some early reviews of Vogelbach's defense this year have not been kind.

What are the reviews on Vogelbach's defense thus far?  I haven't seen a whole lot of scouting reports this season on his defense.

He has 3 errors already at 1B.  Just based on that, it sounds like he has plenty enough work to do as it is to become a competent defender at 1B.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 01, 2013, 08:38:09 am
What are the reviews on Vogelbach's defense thus far?  I haven't seen a whole lot of scouting reports this season on his defense.

He has 3 errors already at 1B.  Just based on that, it sounds like he has plenty enough work to do as it is to become a competent defender at 1B.

Actually, just based on that, it would appear we are magnifying random chance in a small sample size.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 01, 2013, 09:23:01 am
The only reviews I have seen on Vogelbach's defense this year all come from Arguello, of CubsDen.  And his reports all come from one scout.  Other scouts, both in and out of the organization have no doubts that he can be a competent first baseman, and some believe he can be an adequate left fielder.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2013, 03:18:34 pm
Soler: 1-3, 2B, SB, K

Wells: 7-3-1-1-1-3


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_01_pbcafa_dbcafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Smokies game completed early due to rain:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_01_tenaax_msbaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2013, 03:21:19 pm
Not a very encouraging line for Garza in that one.  2 1/3 IP, 2 BB, 0 K's, 1 ER

Hopefully he was just taking it really easy in that start, but it's never a good sign with you're walking Double-A hitters and not being able to strike them out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on May 01, 2013, 03:23:03 pm
Somebody on the PSD board stated his fastball was 88-90. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 01, 2013, 03:26:16 pm
Yeah that's definitely no good. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on May 01, 2013, 03:33:39 pm
Hopefully it was just shaking some rust off, but it isn't inspiring confidence in somebody with arm trouble.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 01, 2013, 03:47:09 pm
They evidently plan to keep Garza in the minors for most of the month, so he has plenty of time to work himself back into shape.  Or get reinjured.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: shasson on May 01, 2013, 09:55:31 pm
As DaveP posted in another thread, someone who has been to the park in Mississippi where Garza threw reported that the gun there tends to be quite slow (as much as 5 mph).

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 01, 2013, 10:09:40 pm
The Cubs have been getting some really good pitching. Johnson has sequenced several excellent games.  Hendricks has had back to back terrific games.  Wells has had a couple, Cates very good yesterday and has had a couple of pretty good games.  We'll see, but as the season progresses we may look back and feel pretty good about some of the pitching developments. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 01, 2013, 10:22:26 pm
Watkins: 3-3, 2B, BB

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_01_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Amaya: 2-3, 2B, BB, PO

Vogelbach: 1-5, 2 RBI, 2 K  (GW-ing single in the 9th)

Johnson: 6-2/3 -4-1-1-1-4,  11-2 GO/FO

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_01_bgrafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 02, 2013, 06:59:11 am
Watkins has bumped his BABIP up to .386, I think.  Now hitting a respectable .279 average, and .901 OPS.

Willson Contreras has 7 walks already.  7 BB/11 K/3 HR, not bad.  Tiny sample, but since guys often do worst in April, that's a very nice start for a 20-year-old catcher.  Only 49 AB, and he hasn't had his first slump yet.  But the longer he can stretch out the anti-slump production, the more interesting he gets. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 02, 2013, 09:47:25 am
Watkins: 3-3, 2B, BB   http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_01_rreaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
..

Vitters finally returned, with a walk and no hits. 

He played LF, not 3B. 

May be just because Stewart is doing 3B for a while.  His back injury might also factor.  But I think it might just make sense to have him in left for the season.  His 3B defense has always been a problem, and Soriano and Sappelt and the Vandy singles hitter aren't exactly compelling long-term left-fielders.  Vitters probably isn't either, I know.  But if he could hit like he did at Iowa last season, or a little better, he might be a decent LF bat with a strong throwing arm. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2013, 08:05:16 pm
Bruno: 2-4, 2B, RBI

Geiger: 2-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_02_dbcafa_lakafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Iowa and Kane County rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 02, 2013, 10:07:27 pm
Torreyes: 2-5, 2B, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_02_tenaax_msbaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 03, 2013, 04:16:23 pm
One month into the minor league season, Cubs righthander Juan Carlos Paniagua has still not received his visa to travel to the United States.

Paniagua signed out of the Dominican Republic for $1.5 million last year in July, had his contract approved and he even pitched in the U.S. briefly after signing. However, the U.S. Consulate has been requesting documents from Paniagua—including school records and identifying documents from his siblings—before issuing him a visa. There’s no clear timetable for when Paniagua might arrive in the U.S. to begin his first full minor league season—if you can call if a full season at this point.

Paniagua has a checkered history with Major League Baseball’s investigations, having failed two of them previously and served two separate penalties that banned him from signing for one year, although he has always used April 4, 1990 as his date of birth on all of his contracts.

Cardinals righthander Carlos Martinez, another Dominican pitcher with a history of document issues, also faced a visa delay this spring, but he eventually received his visa and has been called up to St. Louis.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/juan-carlos-paniagua-still-waiting-for-visa/
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2013, 07:48:50 pm
Amaya: 2-5, 2B, BB, 3 K

Vogelbach: 1-2, RBI, 2 BB, K

Shoulders: 2-6, GW-ing 2-run HR in 11th


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_03_bgrafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Daytona and Iowa rained out.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2013, 10:38:37 pm
KC Game 2:


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_03_bgrafx_kccafx_2&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 03, 2013, 11:32:31 pm
Szczur: 0-5, BB   (4 for last 23)

Cabrera: 6-2-0-0-2-8

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_03_tenaax_msbaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on May 04, 2013, 07:16:28 am
Jackson got his toe injected and is going to miss a few days.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 04, 2013, 10:49:03 am
Bad toe.... yeah, that is likely the reason he was K-ing so much.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 04, 2013, 11:00:02 am
Man, the Cub farm teams have sure been getting a lot of good pitching.  Fun. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: davep on May 04, 2013, 12:45:45 pm
ArizonaPhil

Because Stewart made his debut on an MLB 25-man roster more than three years ago, Optional Assignment Waivers had to be secured before he could be optioned to the minors. Optional Assignment Waivers are revocable (meaning the request can be withdrawn if the player is claimed), and once secured they are good for the entire waiver period. So Stewart can be sent back & forth to the minors without any restrictions (that is, he can be recalled and then be optioned to the minors again anytime during the current waiver period without Optional Assignment Waivers needing to be requested & secured each time). The current waiver period just started this past Tuesday, and it doesn't end until 4 PM (EDT) on July 31st.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on May 04, 2013, 04:16:04 pm
Stewart isn't with the Iowa Cubs today. I guess since he was optioned he gets time to report to the Iowa Cubs, even though he was in Des Moines yesterday.  Jackson went on the DL with turf toe to make room for him.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 04, 2013, 06:00:03 pm
Well this sounds horrendous:

Quote
Meanwhile, Conway looked uncomfortable from his very first pitch, continually pawing at his landing spot and scraping mud out of his spikes after every single pitch. A member of the grounds crew was eventually located after the end of the 1st inning (today is Saturday, so there was just a "skeleton crew" on duty), and while he raked up the mud clogs, nothing was done to dry up the mud itself or stamp-down the mound. On his second pitch in the bottom of the 2nd inning, Conway's spikes got caught in the mud and he tripped and threw a pitch awkwardly, about six feet over the head of the Brew Crew batter. A loud pop could be heard when he let go of the pitch, and his arm recoiled as if he had been shot. He was obviously in tremendous pain, and he ran up the 1st base line into foul territory before coming to a stop and going to one knee. 

Only after Conway left the game did two other members of the Maryvale grounds crew arrive and completely manicure the mound to make it safe for the pitchers.

Conway was immediately driven back to Fitch Park in the Cubs utility van, and presumably he will be examined next week.   


http://www.thecubreporter.com/05042013/cubs-beat-brewers-apparently-lose-conway#more
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 04, 2013, 06:51:37 pm
Well this sounds horrendous:


http://www.thecubreporter.com/05042013/cubs-beat-brewers-apparently-lose-conway#more

That's just ridiculous.   Really hard to believe.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 04, 2013, 08:21:39 pm
Baez: 0-3, SF, 2 RBI, K, HBP

Soler: 1-3, HR, 2 RBI, 2 BB

Francescon: 6-3-0-0-1-5  ( 3 R last 17 IP )

Peralta: 1-1/3 IP, 5 R  ( 13-1/3 IP, 15 R )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_04_dbcafa_lakafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb



Iowa rained out yet again.

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 04, 2013, 10:26:01 pm
Szczur: 0-4, K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_04_tenaax_msbaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Vogelbach: 0-2, 2 BB, E

Contreras: 1-4, 2B, 3 RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_04_dayafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 05, 2013, 07:41:07 am
Szczur has been slumping pretty bad lately.  .184/   .262/.211/.472 in his last 10 games and only 3 runs scored in those games.  Before then he had been scoring a run a game in his first 17 games.  The slump is actually more limited to his last 7 games -- .148 BA, .207 OBP, .148 SLG, .355 OPS and no runs scored.  Those are numbers you might expect from a pitcher.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 05, 2013, 10:12:09 am
While it's hard watching MLB Cubs play as they have so far this season, it's best for the long run.   We're VERY highly likely to be at the top of next year's draft, too, so we will have another shot at one of the top guys coming out and be at the top of the 2nd round (with, possibly, a good supplemental pick). 

Whether or not Baez or Soler or Almora or you name the other guys really pans out, we're starting to build the requisite depth of talent that we've NEVER had in our farm system.   That abundance is absolutely essential for the long-term health of the big-league club.   

Of course, we'll need to develop talent MUCH better than years past and that seems likely, too, with guys like Johnson who've joined the program. 

It's going to continue to be painful for a while, but that pain will be worth it in the long run.  Watching big-money FA teams struggle - e.g. Toronto and Angels and Dodgers (and Cubs from past years) - just reinforces what's always been true...it's about the SYSTEM! 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 05, 2013, 10:23:34 am
Quote
Whether or not Baez or Soler or Almora or you name the other guys really pans out, we're starting to build the requisite depth of talent that we've NEVER had in our farm system.

Well remember, there was a time where Baseball America rated the Cubs farm system #1 in all of baseball during the MacHendry era.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: ben on May 05, 2013, 12:15:11 pm
JR, my best guess is that Baseball America ranked us #1 based on perceived talent level at that time (e.g. Patterson, Choi, Kelton)....certainly, not based on developmental or front-office talent.

Either way, hindsight being 20/20, ranking Cubs farm #1 was WAY off base...whatever the criteria.

Obviously, the reason teams like the Giants, Cards, Braves, Red Sox (and, now, Rangers, Nationals etc.) are in the WS hunt every year is that their SYSTEMs produce an abundance of talent, so they can field numerous plus players AND have the depth to withstand the inevitable injuries.  Our current front office inherited an absolute mess and have had to completely re-construct the foundation.  Seemingly, they are doing that the right way. 

Despite how bad we are at the MLB level, once again, I certainly believe the ship has started sailing in the right direction for the long term.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 05, 2013, 03:28:44 pm
Vogelbach: 1-2, 2B, RBI, 2 BB

Amaya: 2-4, 2B

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_05_dayafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Szczur: 1-3, BB, SB

Hendricks: 5-9-5-5-0-5

Hatley: 1-0-0-0-1-2   (19 K's in 11-2/3 IP)

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_05_tenaax_msbaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 05, 2013, 04:10:03 pm
Vitters: 2-4, HR, 2 RBI

Parker: 1-1-0-0-1-2  ( 11 IP, 5 H, 18 K )

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_05_orhaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 05, 2013, 06:05:07 pm
Bogusevic is 29 years old, but perhaps he's earning a call up with his play?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 05, 2013, 06:17:18 pm
Soler/Baez each: 0-3, BB, 2 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_05_dbcafa_sluafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 05, 2013, 08:44:09 pm
Vitters: 3-5

Jackson: on DL with turf toe


http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_05_orhaaa_iowaaa_2&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 06, 2013, 02:38:35 pm
With Stewart gone, Vitters is playing 3B today. 

Kane is losing.  Lendy Castillo has been really bad, got killed again. 

Vogelbach got a walk and one hit today.  Slips under .300 for batting average, but he's walked 7 times in the last 5 games.  His hit was a double, his third of the season.  He hit his second double yesterday. 

Garza 4 hits in 3.1 innings, 3 K's, 6 groundouts.  Sounds like a favorable outing. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on May 06, 2013, 04:04:07 pm
I listened to the first 2 innings over lunch and he wasn't giving up hard hit balls and was sitting at 94.  It even sounded like the breaking ball was working as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 06, 2013, 04:18:59 pm
Vogelbach: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, E

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_06_dayafx_kccafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Iowa:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_06_orhaaa_iowaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Tennessee off.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 06, 2013, 06:50:41 pm
Lendy Castillo has been really bad, got killed again.

Five games so far.  Terrible in each of the last four.  ERA of 9.39 after 23 innings in low A ball this season.  Looking as if my prospect rating of him was a bit too high....

At the same level two years ago he had an ERA of 2.54 at the same level in 46 innings.  He was used as a starter then, and is being used as a starter now.

What in the world happened to the guy?  He declined that much as a result of being with the Cubs major league team last year?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 06, 2013, 06:53:20 pm
Baez has whiffed his first two AB.  he's had at least 2 K's in four of his last 5 games.  He's been K'ing 50% of his AB's for the last 5 day-stretch. 

33% K-rate this season.  Ouch. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 06, 2013, 08:30:42 pm
Baez: 0-4, 3 K

Soler: 2-4, HR, RBI

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_06_dbcafa_sluafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 07, 2013, 10:00:49 am
Rock Shoulders now has more than 100 ABs (104)

.346/.429/.606 plus 6 homers, 15 walks, and 26 Ks.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=&sid=t446&t=p_pbp&pid=592740
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: DelMarFan on May 07, 2013, 12:35:37 pm
Quote
Baez: 0-4, 3 K

Craig's campaign against Baez is working.  Do the St Paul Saints still have a pig that brings the balls to the umpire?

Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 07, 2013, 01:47:24 pm
Conway apparently injured his arm after tripping on a muddy mound. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 07, 2013, 01:48:17 pm
Conway apparently injured his arm after tripping on a muddy mound. 
Has the severity been determined?  The description was pretty terrible.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 07, 2013, 01:48:58 pm
Do the St Paul Saints still have a pig that brings the balls to the umpire?


They tried it the other way around, but it didn't work as well.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 07, 2013, 02:01:06 pm
Conway apparently injured his arm after tripping on a muddy mound. 

Why did they even have him pitching on a mound apparently that muddy in the first place? 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 07, 2013, 03:06:30 pm
Umpires call, JR.  Obviously the wrong one.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Reb on May 07, 2013, 05:55:57 pm
Umpires call, JR.  Obviously the wrong one.

In extended spring training with 6 people in the stands?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 07, 2013, 05:58:21 pm
Well, Reb, they didn't stop the dang game.

And there were seven people if you count the 3 month old baby that the woman was holding.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 07, 2013, 07:06:34 pm
Josh Vitters is at third as Ian Stewart sits for Iowa.

D. J. LaMehieu and Tyler Colvin start for the Sky Sox.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2013, 08:04:05 pm
Baez: 1-4, HR, RBI, E

Wells: 5 IP, 5 R, 3 HR

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_07_dbcafa_sluafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Kane County idle.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2013, 09:28:18 pm
Tennessee edged 16-0 in 5 innings. They say wet grounds but I'm going with mercy rule.

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_07_biraax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 07, 2013, 11:04:36 pm
Iowa shut out:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_07_iowaaa_cspaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 08, 2013, 12:14:21 am
The Cubs affiliates were outscored 34-3 Tuesday night.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Cactus on May 08, 2013, 11:21:28 am
Daytona trails St. Lucie 5-3 in the fifth.

Jorge Soler is 3-3 with a homer and a double.

Javier Baez has 3 Ks.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Ray on May 08, 2013, 11:40:49 am
The scouting reports are up.

http://scouts.baseballhall.org/

edit--tho the sight is really slow right now.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on May 08, 2013, 12:38:58 pm
I loved the 1982 scouting report on Sandberg, he basically called him a utility infielder with poor defense and so-so bat.  The same scout has a couple of additional ones on the Cubs over the years, and each year Sandberg's report got a little better.  He also has Moreland on some of the reports one year he has no value, the next year he is somebody that could really help their team.  I think I'd love to be a scout.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CurtOne on May 08, 2013, 12:55:29 pm
CBJ, back then, that's actually how wacky some of the scouts were.  They were old players, drinking buddies of somebody in the system.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 08, 2013, 01:03:46 pm
The scouting report on Corey Patterson from the Brewers had him projected as a .295, 12 HR, 40 SB guy before the 1998 draft.  I wonder if he gets picked #3 overall if we had him projected that way or gets developed as a power hitter type.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: CUBluejays on May 08, 2013, 01:04:45 pm
That would fit this guy.  Most of the scouting reports on there have forms that they fill out and this guys was just like a paragraph for each player that he saw on notebook paper.  If you read his 1985 scouting report on Sandberg, you would have never known that he won the MVP award in 1984. I think by 1990 he called him a top 10 player.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: craig on May 08, 2013, 02:59:56 pm
Daytona trails St. Lucie 5-3 in the fifth.

Jorge Soler is 3-3 with a homer and a double.

Javier Baez has 3 Ks.

Nice to see Soler getting hot.  For the moment he's up over .900 OPS.  Fun fun fun. 
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: StrikeZone on May 08, 2013, 03:07:55 pm
Anyone else think it's time to demote Javier Baez?  I think he's proven that he's not ready for Daytona.  It might be hurting him to face pitching he's not ready for at this point.  It may also be hurting his value to let him struggle like this.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Playtwo on May 08, 2013, 03:16:11 pm
I'd leave Baez where he is for now.  See how he adjusts over the next month.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 08, 2013, 03:21:26 pm
Alcantara: 2-5, 2B, RBI, 2 BB

Villanueva: 1-7, 3 K, 2 E

Rosscup: 3-2-0-0-0-3

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_08_biraax_tenaax_1&t=g_box&sid=milb


Soler: 3-4, 2 2B, HR, 2 RBI, BB

Baez: 1-5, 3 K

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_08_dbcafa_sluafa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Jes Beard on May 08, 2013, 03:31:04 pm
Anyone else think it's time to demote Javier Baez?  I think he's proven that he's not ready for Daytona.  It might be hurting him to face pitching he's not ready for at this point.  It may also be hurting his value to let him struggle like this.

I certainly don't.

He needs to learn things.  There is not a real need to dominate the competition.

Demote him to a level he already dominated last year .333/.383/.596/.979, and what is he going to learn?

Additionally there are four other starters on the Daytona team who have a lower OPS  and lower BA than Baez does... should they also each be demoted?  His OPS is higher than the team OPS at Daytona, and better than the OPS of 9 teams in the league, and close to 50 points better than the league average.

Certainly he has not been doing as well as had been hoped, but demotion would make no sense.

Now, for the good news from Daytona -- Stephen Bruno, who seemed to put up flukishly good numbers last year at Boise, is picking up right where he left off last year.  He has a line of .362/.436/.478/.914.  That puts him 7th in the league in BA, 8th in OBP, 21st in slugging (Baez is 24th) and tied for 9th in OPS.  Pretty good for a 2B who also plays SS, 3B, all OF positions and has seriously and favorably worked out behind the plate.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 08, 2013, 05:56:27 pm
Pretty solid outing for Underwood in EST today. Almora seems to have disappeared though.

http://www.thecubreporter.com/05082013/penalver-four-hit-day-pain-halo-angels#more
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 08, 2013, 07:36:15 pm
Vitters: 1-5, RBI, SB, K, E

Loux: 4-7-4-4-3-4

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_08_iowaaa_cspaaa_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JeffH on May 08, 2013, 07:56:26 pm
Josh Vitters stole a base?  Did the catcher suffer a stroke as the pitch was delivered?
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: JR on May 08, 2013, 08:25:07 pm
Either that or the catcher's name is Dioner Castillo.
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 08, 2013, 11:48:23 pm
Vogelbach: 1-4, 2B

Johnson: 4-5-4-4-3-5

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?gid=2013_05_08_kccafx_burafx_1&t=g_box&sid=milb
Title: Re: On the Farm
Post by: Chris27 on May 09, 2013, 05:10:14 am
AzPhil has the Venezuelan league roster:

http://www.thecubreporter.com/05082013/your-2013-vsl-cubs