Author Topic: Cubs in '12  (Read 203036 times)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3180 on: January 09, 2012, 08:04:21 pm »
Interesting that it was announced this morning that Garza was going to be at the convention...and tonight, the rumors of him being traded get strong again.  I wonder if the two are linked...it wouldn't be a very good PR move to bring Garza to the convention, then trade him...so maybe the front office is letting the convention information out to convince the Tigers (and other suitors) that a deal needs to get done soon.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3181 on: January 09, 2012, 08:15:51 pm »
Speaking of Rogers, when's that Marlon Byrd for Matt Harrison trade finally going to happen?

You missed it?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3182 on: January 09, 2012, 09:01:01 pm »
I think Maholm will get no more than a 2 year deal.  I think he's a pretty decent #3.  I suspect the reason the sabermetric front office likes him is because he gets a lot of ground balls, and actually does a pretty decent job of limiting home runs.

Sabermetrics can do a nice job of explaining abberations from one year to another, or to show that some player is actually likely undervalued or over-valued based on more conventional stats, but the goal of a pitcher is to prevent runs from scoring by getting the other team to make outs, and Maholm over the course of his career has an ERA+ of 96, and has only been better than 94 twice in the six years since becoming a regular starter, and those years were ERA+ seasons of 114 and 105.  Just hard to imagine that is because of the Pirates having a bad defense for his entire career and that at the age of 29 he is poised for a breakout season....

OR he's just a guy that will make all his starts and not make a crap ton of money.


DING!!!  DING!!! DING!!!

We have a winner!

Can someone explain why Hoyer thinks he was wrong in calling up Rizzo last year?  In 356 ABs, he had 101 RBIs.  That seems like a reasonable cause to call someone up.

As others have said, he thinks it was wrong because Rizzo obviously was not ready, and Hoyer apparently has some foolish belief that a big part of the GM's role is knowing what minor league players are ready to perform at the major league level and not to bring them up before then.  Unless the guy is someone who will develop and grow at least as fast at the major league level, AND having him up is not going to reduce the prospects of a contending team, I have to agree with him.

The starting 1st baseman is Bryan Lahair, the starting 2cd baseman is Darwin Barney, and the starting 3rd baseman is Ian Stewart.  How is that being as competitive as possible?

It's not.  There really is no other way to look at it.... which would mean that the Theocracy is leaning into the total rebuild approach I have urged.

I'm actually getting excited about seeing which of these players will emerge as genuine finds. 

Sort of assume that any of them will.  Of the players added to the major league roster from outside the organization so far, I would not hold my breath in anticipation of even on emerging as a "genuine find."

I think the idea that Cubs management is flushing this season down the drain is as naive as the idea that they are trying to win the pennant this season.  I think that their major goal is to succeed long term, but have a subsidiary goal to be as competitive as possible whenever doing so does not have negative long term effects, and does not bust the budget.

Most things in this world are not either/or.

True.  But it is when we are talking about the Cubs' 2012 season.


  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3183 on: January 09, 2012, 09:57:25 pm »
It doesn't seem to be official yet, but Paul Maholm is a Cub:

Quote
paul_maholm paul maholm
I hope to get to continue some things when I visit during the year and start some great things as I start my Cubs career. #GodBless

paul_maholm paul maholm
Looking forward to seeing the fans at Cubs convention this weekend and getting to know all the guys. It's gonna be fun.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1322
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3184 on: January 09, 2012, 09:59:10 pm »
Yeah, here is his verified twitter account:

http://twitter.com/paul_maholm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3185 on: January 09, 2012, 10:37:15 pm »
More Maholm:

Quote
@paul_maholm Are you going to be at Ryan Dempster's charity pizza night on Thursday?
5 minutes ago
@paul_maholm
paul maholm
@Veggies915 don't know yet. Just joined team.

@paul_maholm Will you be at @KerryWood 's fundraiser on Friday night @HarrysNavyPier? #Cubs
@paul_maholm
paul maholm
@kcburchell I hope so wanna get involved and support the guys involvement in the community


paul_maholm paul maholm
“@NorthSideKatie: “@paul_maholm: Took this today at airport. #letsgocubs yfrog.com/h6bbpdgj” get used to saying #GoCubsGo =]”


Here's the picture he took in the last tweet:

Unlimited space to host images, easy to use image uploader, albums, photo hosting, sharing, dynamic image resizing on web and mobile.
ImageShack · yfrog.com


So Maholm is openly confirming he's a Cub...pretty strange that it hasn't been acknowledged by the team yet.  Unless this is a really, really good fake Twitter account...

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1647
  • Location: O'Fallon, IL
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3186 on: January 09, 2012, 10:43:39 pm »
The Cubs need to clear a roster spot before they can officially sign Maholm.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2156
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3187 on: January 09, 2012, 11:11:50 pm »
I'm assuming Maholm means Garza is gone.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1647
  • Location: O'Fallon, IL
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3188 on: January 09, 2012, 11:20:44 pm »
If the Cubs get what they want for Garza, he's gone, with or without Maholm. If they don't, he'll stay with the Cubs.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3189 on: January 09, 2012, 11:38:28 pm »
If Garza gone creates a spot for Maholm on the 40, where do the Cubs put the major-league ready guys they get for him in the trade?  Really seems like there should be a consolidation trade for an averagish proven young talent before long.  Maybe a second-basemen where Barney can play short if Castro has legal problems?  And, one that's better than Barney anyway so that the club is improved?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3190 on: January 09, 2012, 11:41:48 pm »
I would think that maybe Jeff Baker or Blake DeWitt or Marlon Byrd would go in any Matt Garza trade.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1647
  • Location: O'Fallon, IL
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3191 on: January 10, 2012, 01:00:47 am »
If they can get a decent player with too little service time to require a roster spot for Baker, DeWitt, Byrd or one of the marginal pitching prospects, or trade Soriano for an indecent one, that would open a roster spot.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3192 on: January 10, 2012, 07:44:28 am »
1 year, $4.25 million for Maholm with a $6.5 million club option for 2013.  Not bad at all.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14445
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3193 on: January 10, 2012, 07:54:19 am »
1 year, $4.25 million for Maholm with a $6.5 million club option for 2013.  Not bad at all.

I'd definitely agree with that.  I'm a little surprised he couldn't do better.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14455
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3194 on: January 10, 2012, 08:54:40 am »
Happy we got him...I watched him pitch in HS, in college, and now he's a Cub...nice!