Author Topic: Cubs in '12  (Read 203139 times)

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10035 on: November 28, 2012, 02:48:52 pm »
It just occurred to me.  Ryan Theriot has TWO World Series rings since leaving the Cubs.

I'm sick.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9236

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10037 on: November 29, 2012, 01:31:21 pm »
Carrie Muskat has new piece on Rob Deer and the work he's already been doing in Arizona with Brett Jackson and Darwin Barney. 

The official website of the Chicago Cubs with the most up-to-date information on news, tickets, schedule, stadium, roster, rumors, scores, and stats.
MLB.com · chicago.cubs.mlb.com

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10038 on: November 29, 2012, 04:19:22 pm »
Dave Kaplan also mentioned that Jackson and Barney were working in Arizona....

Home Page
chsn · csnchicago.com


Barney, who is currently hard at work along with center fielder Brett Jackson with the Cubs hitting coaches in Arizona, is excited to get back to playing at the Friendly Confines.

dave, hadn't Jackson had been sent back home after several weeks in Arizona?

Is he back there now after some time off?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10039 on: November 29, 2012, 04:22:16 pm »
Home Page
chsn · csnchicago.com


Harris is 25 and was an intern for the Reds and Nationals in 2010.... just what does the director of baseball operations do?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9236
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10040 on: November 29, 2012, 05:54:46 pm »
Tommy John surgeries?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10041 on: November 30, 2012, 10:07:41 am »
The non-tender deadline is tonight at midnight.  You'd expect something to happen with Ian Stewart today (either an agreement on a contract that is cheaper than what he'd get through arbitration, or a non-tender) because it's pretty doubtful he'd get ~$2.5 million on the open market.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14445
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10042 on: November 30, 2012, 10:11:53 am »
I'd almost have to think if we were planning on non-tendering him, we would have done it already, right?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10043 on: November 30, 2012, 10:16:36 am »
I don't know, maybe they're trying to work up to the deadline to get him to sign for something like $1-$1.5 million.  Or maybe they're working on a trade for third base, but want to wait as long as possible to make sure the deal goes through.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10044 on: November 30, 2012, 10:23:41 am »
I think br is right.  Lots of things going on behind the scenes right now...no need to cut somebody loose until you absolutely have to.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7170
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10045 on: November 30, 2012, 10:24:34 am »
If they don't re-sign Stewart, we'll know for certain that he has some fatal flaw in his "intangibles", as reckoned by current leadership.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16442
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10046 on: November 30, 2012, 10:33:07 am »
Either that, or they think that his wrist isn't worth a 2 million dollar gamble.

Or, of course, it could be a combination of both, and other factors we are ignorant of.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10047 on: November 30, 2012, 11:21:07 am »
The fact that Stewart is still working out with Cubs trainers and coaches, rehabbing at the team's Arizona facilities indicates the Theocracy is still considering him.

And from Stewart's perspective, he should realize that Chicago would give him a far stronger opportunity for early season playing time than most teams, and that a one year deal with the Cubs and a return to health and performance would make it much lore likely for him to end up in the post-season than signing with many other teams would, since health and performance would mean a mid-season to a contender and a great chance for a nice multi-year contract a year from now.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2012, 11:32:57 am by Jes Beard »

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10048 on: November 30, 2012, 02:40:12 pm »
From the Bleacher Nation blog:

Quote
According to Paul Sullivan, Carrie Muskat, and Bruce Miles on Twitter, Cubs GM Jed Hoyer said a couple interesting things this afternoon:

(1) He expects the Cubs’ 40-man roster to be under 40 by tonight (it currently stands at 40); and

(2) The Cubs are “very likely” (per Sullivan) to have a couple non-tenders (Muskat used the words “may have a couple non-tendered”).

A couple non-tenders?  The arb eligible players on the roster are Garza, Samardzija, Russell, Valbuena, and Stewart.  If there are two non-tenders, then you have to assume that Stewart is one of them.  But who is the other?  I guess Valbuena is the obvious one...but we've heard nothing but how the Cubs are likely to keep him (and really, I don't think there's a more cost effective mutli-position infield backup on the market).  But I guess Valbuena has to be it--Russell is cheap and the Cubs don't have many relief pitchers.   Samardzija is the third most important player on the 40 man right now behind Castro and Rizzo.  And unless Garza is going to have to have TJ and they've kept it quiet, he's not getting non-tendered.

Maybe Hoyer just misspoke.  But if he didn't, it sounds likely that they'll go outside the organization for next year's third baseman.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10049 on: November 30, 2012, 03:10:26 pm »
Quote
Jordan Bernfield ‏@JordanBernfield
#Cubs Hoyer: "We have to address our outfield and we'll look to do that." Says prospects are far enough away they're not blocking w/ vets.

Sounds like they have a lot of confidence in Brett Jackson. (purple)