Author Topic: Cubs in '12  (Read 203231 times)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10080 on: December 01, 2012, 03:40:14 pm »
Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal
Sources: #Cubs in agreement with Japanese closer Kyuji Fujikawa. Rival executives involved in bidding had expected him to go to #Angels.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10081 on: December 01, 2012, 03:41:10 pm »
Good column from Patrick Mooney, including interesting quotes from Hoyer.

http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-chicago-cubs/cubs-talk/The-winter-meetings-Fujikawa-and-where-t?blockID=808363&feedID=10336

“Every team in baseball wants to have an assortment of guys back there that – if the need arises – can pitch in the ninth inning. Hopefully, we can do that. Our bullpen put too much pressure last year on (Shawn) Camp and Russell and Marmol and we have to avoid that. We need to bring in a really good number of arms to make that goal a reality.”

Notice the wording.

Bringing in a "really good number of arms," and not a number of really good arms.  Bring in enough arms, even if all of them are poor, and it will take Sveum a few outings to determine each one is crappy, and you can reduce the workload on whatever good arms there are on the roster.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10082 on: December 01, 2012, 03:49:56 pm »
Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal
Fujikawa deal with #Cubs is two years with a vesting option for a third. He likely will be the team's closer.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14455
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10083 on: December 01, 2012, 03:52:38 pm »
Guess the opportunity to close sealed the deal...hope he's as good as advertised...

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10084 on: December 01, 2012, 03:54:25 pm »
It will be interesting to see long it will be until Carlos Marmol is traded, and what return will they get. 

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10085 on: December 01, 2012, 03:56:58 pm »
Our success with Japanese players has been spectacular!

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10086 on: December 01, 2012, 03:58:16 pm »
We will be bitterly disappointed in our return for Marmol or giddy with excitement over what a haul we got.  I'll bet on the former.  And the folks at NSBB will have their heads explode.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10087 on: December 01, 2012, 04:13:45 pm »
Got to think the Marmol trade is coming soon.  Who needs a closer? 

The Tigers do, probably...maybe for Porcello? 

The Yankees are supposedly looking for someone to set up Rivera who has closing experience in case he has trouble coming back from that injury.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14445
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10088 on: December 01, 2012, 04:18:12 pm »
The Yankees make a lot of sense, especially with the Hendry and Rothschild connections.

Then again, those might also be reasons why it'd have no prayer of happening.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10089 on: December 01, 2012, 04:29:42 pm »
Some tweets from David Kaplan, whose information seems to be as good as anyone since the new front office took over.

Quote
Cubs skeptical they can move Soriano. They will not eat all the remaining dollars unless they get something good in return. No point.

Signing of Fujikawa not done to flip him. They like skill set + are trying to upgrade pitching staff. More moves coming.

Sources tell me not done on adding starters. Cubs will head to Nashville looking to add another starter and a RF. Third base tough to fill.

@TheRealCrowhuck @BleacherNation Vitters is not considered much of a prospect among the scouts in baseball that I've talked to recently.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10090 on: December 01, 2012, 04:44:36 pm »
Another tweet from Kaplan. If true, sure is interesting.


David Kaplan ‏@thekapman
How about this: When Cubs drafted Vitters the guy that Tim Wilken wanted but wasn't allowed to sign was Orioles star catcher Matt Wieters.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10091 on: December 01, 2012, 04:45:53 pm »
David Kaplan ‏@thekapman
That was before Ricketts took over and money wasn't there for over slot signings. Wilken loved him.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10092 on: December 01, 2012, 04:48:21 pm »
David Kaplan ‏@thekapman
In addition 2 Wieters, Cubs were close to drafting Jarrod Parker that draft. Mgmt didn't want risk of HS arm They had Vitters below other 2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10093 on: December 01, 2012, 04:57:58 pm »
David Kaplan ‏@thekapman
Look, here's the deal. Hendry was told in '06 to spend + try to win immediately. He spent and came close. That came at the expense of draft

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10094 on: December 01, 2012, 04:59:51 pm »
Here's what Keith Law had to say about Fujikawa in his top 50 free agent rankings (he had him ranked #30):

Quote
The closer for the Hanshin Tigers is a true free agent now at age 32 after a successful 12-year NPB career that saw him strike out one out of every three batters he faced.

He's not as dominant as he used to be and pitches with a solid-average fastball and a good splitter that is occasionally plus, showing more of a steady drop than the abrupt tumble of a really good splitter. He also missed some time in 2012 with an adductor strain, and hasn't thrown 70 innings in a season since 2007.

He has potential as a setup man but I don't think he's an elite reliever unless that splitter gets sharper or more consistent.

Just FWIW, Law doesn't normally rank relievers very high, so #30 is a pretty strong ranking.  There were three ahead of him on the list: Rivera at #12, Soriano at #14, and Madson at #21.