Author Topic: Cubs in '12  (Read 203105 times)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14445
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10155 on: December 03, 2012, 02:34:25 pm »
Actually, Deshaies sounds like a great hire.  Glad the Cubs didn't feel like they had to settle for an ex-Cub and actually went out to hire the best broadcaster available. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18846
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10156 on: December 03, 2012, 02:36:22 pm »
Craig you don't miss on the World Series for 100 years without trying really hard to be bad.  I think the Cubs will be somewhat respectable until the trading deadline, and then you'll see slightly better versions of the crap guys.  With Rizzo, Castro, Samardijzia, a healthy Garza it will be difficult to be #1 pick worthy. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10157 on: December 03, 2012, 02:48:34 pm »
You need to learn how to spell Eric Karros properly too.

Man, am I in deep trouble when my spelling is corrected by Jiggy.   ;)

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10158 on: December 03, 2012, 03:05:14 pm »
Ron, make sure the rope is short enough that your feet are off the floor or you'll never hear the end of it.

BTW, Deshaies goes from the Astros to the Cubs.  Talk about a glutton for punishment.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14445
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10159 on: December 03, 2012, 03:07:22 pm »
Quote
Paul Sullivan ‏@PWSullivan

Deshaies' friends say Len Kasper pushed hard on Deshaies hiring. #Clout

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14455
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10160 on: December 03, 2012, 03:31:17 pm »
Good choice, although I hope Berman never visits the booth and subjects us to "Two Silhouettes on DeShaies"...

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14445
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10161 on: December 03, 2012, 03:57:36 pm »
A follow up on one of the Theocracy's least admirable moves since taking over . . .

Quote
Paul Sullivan ‏@PWSullivan

Congrats to Jimmy Bank, voted traveling secretary of the year by peers. #AlsoFired http://twitpic.com/biu348

Gordon Wittenmyer ‏@GDubCub

Longtime Cubs traveling sec'y Jimmy Bank voted traveling sec'y of year by peers -- just weeks after Cubs abruptly let him go. #LouBrock

Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10162 on: December 03, 2012, 04:08:49 pm »
Here's some video links of DeShaies that I found linked on the The Cub Reporter comments section (you might get a 30 second commercial on the first link).

http://www.obstructedview.net/chicago-cubs/will-jim-deshaies-be-the-replacement-for-bob-brenly.html

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16248
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10163 on: December 03, 2012, 05:28:26 pm »
Quote
Paul Sullivan ‏@PWSullivan

Deshaies' friends say Len Kasper pushed hard on Deshaies hiring. #Clout

Kasper is good.  That says a lot, I think, that he wanted Deshaies.  Deshaies sounds a whole lot preferable to Sutcliffe or Grace, that's for sure. 

Now lets get him some good players to talk about.  I have to imagine that for an announcer, as for a player, being associated with a Cubs team that goes to a world series, and wins it, would be awfully special. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10164 on: December 03, 2012, 06:27:36 pm »
For a while, there have been suggestions that the Cubs could end up getting a corner OF instead of a CF this winter.  Now there is at least one report/tweet that DeJesus will be the CF to open next season, and the Cubs will focus on getting a RF instead of a CF. 

If the Cubs believe that Jackson can be ready sometime in 2013, that would make some sense. If the Cubs do manage to trade Soriano for some decent value, having a corner option would be helpful. Also, DeJesus will be a free agent after next season.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10165 on: December 03, 2012, 06:29:52 pm »
Theo flashing a little humor.

Carrie Muskat ‏@CarrieMuskat
#Cubs still checking FA options at 3B. Theo Epstein on thin FA market there: "It'd be good to be Mike Schmidt right about now."

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10166 on: December 03, 2012, 06:38:37 pm »
I keep reading and hearing about the Indians who are available...I've got to say, if the Cubs could find a few players that they want, they seem to be a perfect fit.  Choo has one year left and is a Boras client, so he can't have a ton of trade value.  But he could possibly be the Cubs' best hitter.  And Asdrubal Cabrera's defense has slipped a little the last couple of years, so a move to third base might be in his future...and his defense would probably be really good over there.  He'll play next season at 27 years old, so he's young enough that the Cubs could keep him around for a while (but his current contract only has 2 more years, which will limit his value).

I believe Bruce Levine has said multiple times that the Indians do like some of the Cubs prospects.  So I just wonder if there is a deal based around young but replaceable major league guys with value (Wood, Barney, Clevenger) and Hendry-era prospects that aren't valued as much by the new front office (Jackson, Lake, Szczur, maybe McNutt or Vitters) to get both of them.  Probably not...someone probably would want Cabrera enough as a SS to give up a borderline top prospect for him. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7170
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10167 on: December 03, 2012, 06:42:53 pm »
For a while, there have been suggestions that the Cubs could end up getting a corner OF instead of a CF this winter.  Now there is at least one report/tweet that DeJesus will be the CF to open next season, and the Cubs will focus on getting a RF instead of a CF. 

If the Cubs believe that Jackson can be ready sometime in 2013, that would make some sense. If the Cubs do manage to trade Soriano for some decent value, having a corner option would be helpful. Also, DeJesus will be a free agent after next season.

I believe the Cubs hold a 2014 option on DeJesus.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10168 on: December 03, 2012, 06:59:41 pm »
If the Cubs fielded a 75 win team in 2013, they're only a few tweaks away from being interesting in 2014.  If they put another potential 100 loss team on the field, It takes a major overhaul next year to make them interesting in 2014.

In 1990 the Atlanta Braves put together their 3rd straight 97 loss or worse season , averaging 100 losses a year for three straight years, losing 92, 86 and 97 in the three years before that, but the last three years of that were seasons when management had stopped really trying to field a com-petitive team.  Those three seasons Atlanta management made no real efforts to make moves to win games those seasons, they instead focused on building a foundation for long-term success.  After the 1990 season they made one significant FA signing, for Terry Pendelton, who was not exactly the top FA that season, but he fit their needs, and they had decided their roster had developed to the point that it WAS time to make a move.

They made it to the WS, and began a lengthy run of dominance of the NL.

I see the Theocracy doing the same thing, and I have no desire that they deviate from their path one bit in order to win another handful of games in 2013, with no real chance of going anywhere.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #10169 on: December 03, 2012, 07:06:38 pm »
A follow up on one of the Theocracy's least admirable moves since taking over . . .

Quote
Paul Sullivan ‏@PWSullivan

Congrats to Jimmy Bank, voted traveling secretary of the year by peers. #AlsoFired http://twitpic.com/biu348

Gordon Wittenmyer ‏@GDubCub

Longtime Cubs traveling sec'y Jimmy Bank voted traveling sec'y of year by peers -- just weeks after Cubs abruptly let him go. #LouBrock

JR, I suspect that there was a specific, and most likely perfectly valid, reason for that decision, but that the position of traveling secretary is simply not one likely to result in much digging into the matter.