Author Topic: Cubs in '12  (Read 203083 times)

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3210 on: January 10, 2012, 10:11:20 am »
That's too bad about Wood.  Lots of ways to look at it.  He's got a better chance to get a ring elsewhere.  A team as bad as ours doesn't need a good set-up man, at least one that costs as much as he's worth.  And, even though he is often depicted as a great teammate and a good model, perhaps Theocracy feels that it's part of the housecleaning...get rid of as much of the old Cubs as you can. 

What I fear the most is that they get rid of too many of the guys we like to cheer for, fewer seats are sold, and when they need the cash...it won't be there.  But it ain't my money.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3211 on: January 10, 2012, 10:12:44 am »
Quote
BruceMiles2112 Bruce Miles
#Cubs 40-man technically at 41. Waiver move coming to clear space. No correlation with any possible Garza trade and Maholm signing.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3212 on: January 10, 2012, 10:17:49 am »
Too bad they can't waive Hill a second time.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7170
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3213 on: January 10, 2012, 10:25:14 am »
OK, let's make our guesses as to who gets waived.

Marcos Mateo.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3214 on: January 10, 2012, 10:27:02 am »
Starlin Castro.

Okay.

Maybe not.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3215 on: January 10, 2012, 10:27:35 am »
Whoever it is, NSBB will have a frickin cow.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3216 on: January 10, 2012, 10:29:51 am »
If we released Soriano, are we on the hook for the whole 18M, or 18M less whatever another team signs him for?  I don't remember how that works.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7170
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3217 on: January 10, 2012, 10:32:31 am »
18M less whatever another team signs him for, but another team would sign him only for the major league minimum.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3218 on: January 10, 2012, 10:34:01 am »
You know, as much as we want him gone, there might be two or three teams interested in going two or three mil in a bidding war.  It might be worth the g amble.

Of course, they could DFA somebody and gain themselves, what, 72 hours to make a move with him?

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3219 on: January 10, 2012, 10:40:21 am »
I think they can still trade him to an AL team and pay 15 mil per season and get something decent for him. It might not be Wade Davis as Gammons suggests, but it'll be better than hoping a bidding war starts for him.   

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3220 on: January 10, 2012, 10:53:20 am »
There's just not going to be much of a market for Soriano...there are still plenty of mediocre guys who could DH or play the outfield on the market that would cost nothing but money and would be available for one year: Hawpe, Nady, Burrell, Damon, Gomes, Ibanez, Ludwick, Scott, Spilborghs, Ordonez, Ross, Vlad, Matsui, even Manny. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3221 on: January 10, 2012, 10:53:56 am »
Quote
10:38am: The Cubs offered Wood a "substantial" raise, GM Jed Hoyer told reporters today.  Wood had a below-market base salary of $1.5MM in 2011.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16442
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3222 on: January 10, 2012, 10:56:17 am »
Jeff Bianchi is likely to get waived.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3223 on: January 10, 2012, 10:59:31 am »
The Pirates were acquiring players at the deadline last July, not selling.

I forgot that.  Good point.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5916
Re: Cubs in '12
« Reply #3224 on: January 10, 2012, 11:15:27 am »
That Maholm deal is a steal.