Author Topic: Cubs in '13 1/15/13 - 6/11/13  (Read 55209 times)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26958
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #630 on: March 22, 2013, 11:07:44 am »
Sveum is going to announce the official list in a few minutes, but it looks like at least these guys have been cut: Coleman, Bogusevic, Nelson, Parker, Chapman, Carpenter, Maysonet.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26958
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #631 on: March 22, 2013, 11:16:20 am »
Quote
Paul Sullivan ‏@PWSullivan
Cubs make 11 cuts. Sappelt makes team. Bogusevic sent down. Will look to waiver wire for last infielder.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26958
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #632 on: March 22, 2013, 11:29:51 am »
Rusin is the biggest cut, he's going down to continue to start in AAA. 

Takahashi, Dolis, Putnam, and Wade are left competing for the last bullpen spot...got to think Takahashi is in unless he just really bombs in the last week.

Alberto Gonzalez and Clevenger are still around, but the Cubs are still looking outside the organization for their last infielder.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1789
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #633 on: March 22, 2013, 11:36:59 am »
Ryan Theriot is still looking for employment.

Don't flame me.  Just kidding.

Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #634 on: March 22, 2013, 12:27:48 pm »
Ramon Ramirez just released by Giants.  I might prefer him over Takahashi for the last bullpen spot.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26958
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #635 on: March 22, 2013, 12:37:45 pm »
Jesse Rogers was just chatting over at ESPN.  And while I don't think he knows much about baseball, he was hinting that the Cubs could be looking into Chone Figgins. 

Figgins did actually get on base pretty well this spring before the Marlins released him (.367 OBP), but he had no extra base hits in 32 plate appearances.  Not sure he'd actually help the team...but if he did have a decent first half, he might bring back a better prospect than whoever else eventually fills that roster spot based on his past reputation.

Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #636 on: March 22, 2013, 01:24:06 pm »
As I mentioned a few days ago, Figgins is primarily responsible for the worst 3B production of any club in over a decade:  the 2011 Mariners who had a 3B team slash line of 195-252-275.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14454
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #637 on: March 22, 2013, 01:31:47 pm »
Yeah, but the good news is...he really couldn't do much worse...

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #638 on: March 22, 2013, 01:48:02 pm »
Ain't nobody who is happy with the Cubs' 3B situation.  But I'm curious who here regrets that the Cubs let Aramis Ramirez go. 

I'm not because even though I appreciated his ability a lot, I think his presence would have had something of a detrimental effect on the culture change being undertaken.

My sense is that the Epstein regime placed a very high priority on that change, much higher than winning games in the short term.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26958
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #639 on: March 22, 2013, 01:58:42 pm »
I don't regret letting Ramirez go. 

I don't think he would've had any kind of detrimental impact on the culture change, though.  I think he's just not a good bet to stay healthy and good over the last two years of his contract.  He's been somewhat injury prone his whole career, has never been much of a defender or baserunner, and has the type of skills at the plate that can fade fast. 

If he would've taken a 1 year or 1 year + team option deal, I the front office would've been fine with having him stick around.  But the three year deal was just too much for a player like him.

Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #640 on: March 22, 2013, 02:13:27 pm »
Aramis had the 2nd best OPS+ of his career in 2012.  Not showing signs of a decline yet.  The guaranteed portion of his contract only runs through 2014, with an average of $12 per season in the deal.  I don't see that as a bad contract for the Brewers.

Basically, Cubs swapped Aramis for Pierce Johnson.  So, that might turn out great in the long run for the Cubs.

I think letting Aramis depart had a whole lot to do with culture.  I think Theo has implied as much in some of his general comments about unspecified guys who are no longer here.  Theo didn't want him--that's my sense.

There is no getting around the dramatic turnaround in 3B production caused (so far) by his departure and the dramatic improvement for the Brewers.  As I noted a few days ago, Cubs and Brewers basically swapped spots from the top to the bottom in 3B production from 2011 to 2012.  Incredible offensive difference.

You can say that it doesn't matter because Cubs are non-contenders and that having Aramis around might well have pushed the Cubs draft spot back from #2 this June, etc.  But, no getting around that current Cubs lineup would be dramatically better with Aramis at clean-up instead of Valbuena at #7.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #641 on: March 22, 2013, 02:18:16 pm »
So, Reb, I agree with all that.  But regrets or not?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16244
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #642 on: March 22, 2013, 02:20:58 pm »
No regret, it was the right move to make.  So he would have helped us win 65 games last year, who cares.  And might help us win 75 this year, who cares. 

Pierce Johnson is no sure thing, but I'd certainly not trade him back for Aram right now. 

And I'm not sure I'd want to trade the #2 pick for the #6 pick or whatever Aram's extra production might have bumped us to. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #643 on: March 22, 2013, 02:21:34 pm »
Joe Posnanski has a nice article on Theo that includes this anecdote about the construction of the "Cubs Way" book.

It was written with great care. At one point, there was a two-hour argument about whether the runner, when rounding first base, should touch the bag with his left or right foot. Many around baseball think left. The Cubs — because this is Theo’s team — went through a painstaking surveying process, where they decided that the distance is actually a little bit shorter if you touch the base with the right foot. So touching first base with the right foot is now part of The Cubs Way.

Home Page
chsn · csnchicago.com


  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16442
Re: Cubs in '13
« Reply #644 on: March 22, 2013, 02:38:30 pm »
Rookies are subjected to hazing in their first year, especially in September - looking after luggage, carrying stuff around the clubhouse, etc.

When Castro came up, Ramirez prevented the others from subjecting him to this, although he did not prevent the hazing of non-Latino players.

For this alone, he should have been gone immediately.