Author Topic: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)  (Read 51133 times)

Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #855 on: September 10, 2015, 02:19:32 pm »

There's also the old Bob Horner quote: "We finished last with you, we can finish last without you".

That goes back to Branch Rickey (and Ralph Kiner's salary).

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #856 on: September 10, 2015, 02:31:59 pm »
There's also the old Bob Horner quote: "We finished last with you, we can finish last without you".

I'm always curious why this logic doesn't hold up on the other end: "We finished first with you, we can finish first without you."  The Cubs are going to win the second wild card spot by about 10 games.  It's unlikely that Rizzo made a 10 game difference in the standings this year by himself--one player just isn't that valuable on a baseball team.  So if you're going to follow this logic, you need to remove players from all teams that ran away with their playoff spots too.

So in that case, players from the Cubs, Dodgers, and Mets are ineligible.  That means the MVP is McCutchen--without him, the Pirates would likely be in line for the second wild card spot.  Or maybe it's Jason Heyward--his fWAR (3.9) is basically identical to the current difference between the Cardinals and Pirates (4 games in the loss column).

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #857 on: September 10, 2015, 02:35:07 pm »
Since there's no one official definition of what the MVP is supposed to be, it's probably just as well that it will be decided by a whole bunch of voters who will approach it with their own definition of what it's supposed to be.  And it will be Harper.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18846
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #858 on: September 10, 2015, 02:43:35 pm »
Without Harper the Nats would be closer to the Phillies than the Mets.   He was their entire offense almost the whole year.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #859 on: September 10, 2015, 02:48:43 pm »
That goes back to Branch Rickey (and Ralph Kiner's salary).
Hmmm...I tended to recall it had something to do with Calvin Griffith, so I went to Wikipedia.  Hysterical.  Consider the Atlanta Hawks owner and the guy with the Clippers.  How would this quote float today:

"I'll tell you why we came to Minnesota. It was when we found out you only had 15,000 blacks here. Black people don't go to ballgames, but they'll fill up a rassling ring and put up such a chant it'll scare you to death. We came here because you've got good, hardworking white people here."[3]

He said that in 1978 and got away with it!  Holy crap!

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #860 on: September 10, 2015, 03:13:27 pm »
LMAO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18846
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #861 on: September 10, 2015, 05:52:20 pm »
Not to beat the Harper MVP dead horse, but Harper 8.6 fWAR. Rest of the Nationals positional fWAR 8.3.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1021
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #862 on: September 10, 2015, 07:40:26 pm »
I think they should have 2 awards Mvp and then one for most outstanding player

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29618
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #863 on: September 10, 2015, 07:50:40 pm »
Agree.   Then let's give everyone with more than ten hits a blue ribbon.   But everyone gets at least a red ribbon so nobody feels bad and has their ego damaged.  And every team gets rings.  Big shiney ones.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #864 on: September 10, 2015, 07:53:06 pm »
There are enough awards already.  They need to just clarify the rules for the MVP.

A most outstanding player award would make the MVP so arbitrary and narrative-driven that it wouldn't mean anything anyway.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18846
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #865 on: September 11, 2015, 12:02:48 am »
I was just going through MLB Trade Rumors and Gordo had a piece that the Cubs are estimating a 275,000 increase in fans this year and that could lead to an extra $20+ million in revenue.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16442
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #866 on: September 11, 2015, 10:03:21 am »
When they started the MVP award, the purpose was to recognize not the best player in baseball, but the most valuable player for a particular team.  Many players have been overlooked by fans because they were doing the little things that are not obvious to fans, but were vital to a particular team.  The guy that got on base so that the home run hitter could drive them in.  The guy that consistently got the game winning hit.  The little shortstop that prevented runs from scoring.

Personally, I think that voters seldom voted for those guys anyway.  They would make it more equitable if they just made the Cy Young aware for the best pitcher (which they mostly have) and the other award (under any name) for the best position player.

But then, what would the talk radio and reporters have to talk about?

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14455
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #867 on: September 11, 2015, 10:20:01 am »
Isn't that what the Hank Aaron Award is?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16442
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #868 on: September 11, 2015, 11:05:23 am »
Yes, but it has never attained the status equal to the MVP or Cy Young award. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8857
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #869 on: September 11, 2015, 01:00:45 pm »
Patrick Mooney has a piece on Bryant in the OF, with quotes from Maddon, that is pretty interesting.

http://bleacherreport.com/tb/dhgBt?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=chicago-cubs