Author Topic: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)  (Read 51162 times)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7170
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #870 on: September 11, 2015, 01:03:22 pm »
the other award (under any name) for the best position player.

I propose the Mick Kelleher Award.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16248
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #871 on: September 11, 2015, 01:42:30 pm »
Patrick Mooney has a piece on Bryant in the OF, with quotes from Maddon, that is pretty interesting.

http://bleacherreport.com/tb/dhgBt?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=chicago-cubs

Hadn't thought about the different throwing mechanics between positions at all. 


Interesting that Maddon says Bryant will play OF "a lot".  I assume he's think more the remainder of this season than next year and beyond.  May not reflect well on Soler being back 100% anytime soon. 

Cubs don't have great defense, but I think the positional versatility that Bryant, Baez, and Russell have all shown has been really nice.  All three seem very capable defensively at several positions.  Castro too, the move to 2B has been smooth.

jes brought this up the question of Castro beyond this season.  Certainly teams wanting a middle-infielder will know he could be available.  Still, I'm not sure that his modest resurgence is going to greatly elevate his trade value.  Fair chance the Cubs may decide no trade offer is worth it, and just keeping him, again ending up with a lot of versatility. 


Coghlan, Soler, Schwarber, and Bryant would give good corner coverage.  Baez, Russell, Bryant, and Castro would give good infield coverage.  Having 7 guys for 5 spots gives pretty good protection, while also keeping guys pretty engaged.

Of course, *IF* Castro had enough trade value to be a part of a trade for a reliever or starter, it's not like the Cubs don't have money to pursue some other depth guy. 
« Last Edit: September 11, 2015, 01:51:28 pm by craig »

Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #872 on: September 11, 2015, 01:50:36 pm »
I was just going through MLB Trade Rumors and Gordo had a piece that the Cubs are estimating a 275,000 increase in fans this year and that could lead to an extra $20+ million in revenue.

Cubs began this season at about $120 payroll. Coming off books from 2015 opening day for 2016 are Motte and Wada (each $4), and Denorfia, Castillo, Coke (at combined about $7).

But, Lester goes up by $5 for 2016, Montero by $2, Fowler by $6 (if accepts QO), Soler by $1, Rondon and Grimm enter arb for first time from near-minimum, Strop, Coghlan, Wood (non-tender?) get arb increases, and, if course, major arb increase for Arrieta (from paltry $3.6 in 2015.

Trading Castro deletes about $7. Still, looks like a net payroll increase--before any additions.

2016 payroll? Who knows, but adding Price--on top of status quo increases--seems to require more than a $20 payroll bump.

Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #873 on: September 11, 2015, 02:17:16 pm »
Think it's unlikely Castro is back in 2016. Cubs can take pose, as Craig posits, that don't have to trade him...but, as practical matter, awkward for everybody to keep him as a utility guy going forward. Castro has been good trooper for tail end of this season but wouldn't assume that for 2016.

More broadly, don't think we'd see all the current positional shuffling if Soler was healthy. Maddon has gone from a stifling 4-man bench to an 8-man bench. He loves that, fun for him, and keeps the regulars fresh. But tougher to do with the usual 4-man bench to open 2016.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18846
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #874 on: September 11, 2015, 02:20:40 pm »
Your forgetting almost $10 million for Fowler coming off the books.  Monterro could also clear $14 million.

Lester's base goes up $5 million, but he got a $30 million signing bonus so I'm not sure how Cot's handled that.

The $20 million in attendance isn't the only increase in revenue as well. The budgets for the draft and IFA will also be a lot less as well.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #875 on: September 11, 2015, 02:25:05 pm »
I think they will only keep Castro if they decide they want him to be the everyday second baseman.  I don't think they will do this unless they have decided that they want Baez to be the everyday third baseman.  It could happen, but I'm guessing that Castro will be moved in the offseason.

Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #876 on: September 11, 2015, 02:33:38 pm »
Didn't forget Fowler. Included him, with salary bump. Think expectation is QO for him--probably won't accept, but somebody has to play there. Pretty sure Cubs won't save his entire 2015 salary for CF.

Think very unlikely Montero is traded and Schwarber assumes starting catcher to open 2016. Yeah, that would save lots of payroll money, but that impacts handling of pitching staff and Schwarber not ready for all that. Think we have to figure Montero's 2016 salary (with bump too).

Cots includes a $5 bump for Lester.

Also, keep in mind that the $120 for 2015 supposedly included big bucks "saved" from the Tanaka non-signing. That has now been spent.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #877 on: September 11, 2015, 02:33:53 pm »
Soler is playing with Myrtle Beach tonight.  He'll stick with them if they advance in the playoffs.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2267
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #878 on: September 11, 2015, 02:38:43 pm »
Thanks for that note about Soler, brjones...that will make the Myrtle Beach game even more interesting!

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16442
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #879 on: September 11, 2015, 03:05:07 pm »
I think that Maddon is talking about playing Bryant in the OF a lot (and I assume he is talking about the rest of this season, and not necessarily future seasons) is because he is expecting to play Baez a lot for the rest of the season, and there isn't a lot of room for him.  Especially if Castro has a strong finish, which is no longer seeming to be a long shot.

It would be interesting to speculate on the playoff roster if Soler actually comes back he, Baez and Castro all finish strong.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18846
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #880 on: September 11, 2015, 03:38:20 pm »
Didn't forget Fowler. Included him, with salary bump. Think expectation is QO for him--probably won't accept, but somebody has to play there. Pretty sure Cubs won't save his entire 2015 salary for CF.

Think very unlikely Montero is traded and Schwarber assumes starting catcher to open 2016. Yeah, that would save lots of payroll money, but that impacts handling of pitching staff and Schwarber not ready for all that. Think we have to figure Montero's 2016 salary (with bump too).

Cots includes a $5 bump for Lester.

Also, keep in mind that the $120 for 2015 supposedly included big bucks "saved" from the Tanaka non-signing. That has now been spent.

The Tanka money went to Lester's signing bonus, he'd then be a -$25 million going into next year.  Most of the buzz is that the Cubs will give Fowler the QO offer and let him walk.  There is plenty of room to cut salaries on the roster and plenty of new money coming in. If Price signs elsewhere in the off season it won't be because the Cubs can't afford him.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16442
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #881 on: September 11, 2015, 04:01:54 pm »
It isn't only a question of whether or not the Cubs can afford him.  It is also a question of whether or not he is worth the money he will get, and whether or not that money can be better spent elsewhere.

I don't think that the Cubs are going to sign Price or any other pitcher at a 7 year 25 million per year (or higher) contract.  I believe that at this point they believe their money is better spent (and much less risky) if it is spent on depth rather than superstars.  A couple of 3 year, 15 million per year starting pitchers May bring more to the team than one Price.  And a devastating injury to one of them will not hurt them through 2022 or whatever.  And it also allows money for a couple of top relievers and a center fielder.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16248
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #882 on: September 11, 2015, 04:11:57 pm »
Think it's unlikely Castro is back in 2016. Cubs can take pose, as Craig posits, that don't have to trade him...but, as practical matter, awkward for everybody to keep him as a utility guy going forward. Castro has been good trooper for tail end of this season but wouldn't assume that for 2016.

I expect Castro's future depends on what other teams offer.  Two extreme possibilities:
1.  "no-talent-return":  Cubs are so happy to offload Castro's salary and the awkwardness that they'll trade him without expecting any meaningful talent . 
2.  "great-talent-return":  Some teams think Castro is a terrific value, and will offer really good talent to get him. 

IN between "no-talent-return" and "great-talent-return" extremes is a vast middle ground.  My guess is that many shoppers will be interested in Castro only at cut-rate price, based on his poor hitting two of least three years, and on a perception many GM's may hold that he's soft/dumb/distracted.  If the offers aren't very strong at all, Cubs may or may not sell, depending on how they themselves evaluate him.  I'm not sure whether the "awkwardness" is that big of a drive; Castro is a mild personality, eager to please, dwarfed by the bigger/stronger personalities in the Cubs clubhouse.  I'm not predicting they won't trade him, but I can very easily envision them not doing so.  Designate Schwarber and Baez as the LF/2B starters; Coghlan and Castro formally "subs" who could play a ton and enable Maddon to adapt/adjust to almost any and every situation. 

More broadly, don't think we'd see all the current positional shuffling if Soler was healthy. Maddon has gone from a stifling 4-man bench to an 8-man bench. He loves that, fun for him, and keeps the regulars fresh. But tougher to do with the usual 4-man bench to open 2016.

I think a 12-man staff and a bench with Ross, Castro, LaStella, Coghlan, and Denorfia could be exceptionally functional.  Maddon could still flex a lot, platoon, mix-and-match, pinch hit.  Perhaps replace one or more of those guys with somebody with similar profile, or better.  Of course, that's assuming that Castro could hit when he got used, and that perhaps LaStella could too. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16442
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #883 on: September 11, 2015, 04:54:47 pm »
I think that Maddon has his eyes on Baez as his supersub, playing 150 games, but at several different positions.  I think that will also include some outfield play.

Maddon loves to "mix and match", and he can do that much easier with someone that can start at several positions.  Coghlan could do that, but he could not do it with the defensive excellence that Baez brings to the table.

Of course, that assumes that Baez can actually provide the kind of offense that we have long hoped for.

I don't think the Cubs will be in a hurry to trade Castro.  If the offer is good enough, he will be traded, but the same can and should be said for everyone on the roster.  But I don't think that they will specifically want to trade him.  His salary isn't that high, and he seems to be taking to the uncertainty of a bench player.

Reb

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '15 (8/3 - 12/1)
« Reply #884 on: September 11, 2015, 05:13:26 pm »
.......There is plenty of room to cut salaries on the roster and plenty of new money coming in. If Price signs elsewhere in the off season it won't be because the Cubs can't afford him.

Where is the "plenty of room" to cut salary.

Think you're assuming Montero is traded--likely wrong assumption--and that Cubs save almost entirety of Fowler's salary filling CF--also likely wrong assumption.

Arb guys go up year to year, especially big Arrieta bump and arb newbies Rondon and Grimm. Other  arb guys too.  E. Jackson still on book for 2016. Lester and Montero and Soler contracts go up.  Maybe Wood is non-tendered--I doubt it.  Already mentioned the low cost FAs leaving. Where is the plenty of room to cut payroll?

Other than attendance bump, where are purported revenue jumps for 2016 coming from? And, I've never heard that int'l signings affect big league annual payroll. Doubt there's any meaningful correlation.

Don't know if 2016 payroll can accommodate Price or not, in addition to other moves Cubs might undertake (Zobrist? reliever(s) to replace Motte and/ or Wood? But, think it's fanciful to simply assume payroll can accommodate another $25-30 pitcher, given upward bumps from guys on hand.