Jimenez and Cease wouldn't get you a #1 unless it was a rental. Lester/Quintana is going to be just fine as a 1/2 punch and you still have dollars left to improve the rotation further.
Lester has an ERA+ of 99, and Quintana 95. If that is the bet punching power you have, simply pack it in and go home.
Top of rotation means 1/2, no? Otherwise what's the point of saying TORP in lieu of #1 to begin with? Quintana is a TORP.
Quintana's best year was an ERA+ of 126, which is a decent #2, but not even a strong #2, and is not a #1. And that is he BEST year. THIS year he has an ERA+ of 95 -- he is not as good as league average. For his career he has an ERA+ of 115. To have a good idea of what he is, look at who his closest career comparable pitchers are thru age 27 (which does not include his disappointing 2017 season when he has been 28):
Pete Richert (966.5)
Brandon Webb (962.3)
Denny Lemaster (960.0)
Jon Niese (959.5)
Dick Bosman (957.7)
Bob Knepper (957.6)
Ed Halicki (956.2)
Dave Goltz (954.8 )
Dennis Bennett (954.8 )
Ken Hill (954.6)
If you find any #1 pitchers in there, we clearly have different definitions. You don't even find strong #2 pitchers.
I thought that Q would bring back more. Happy to have Eloy. But if you look at this as spending 2.8 million on Eloy and 1.x on Cease... one hell of a purchase 4 million of prospects for a cost controlled top 15 starter.
Oh, puuleeeze.
In 2016, his best season to date, and much better than he is in 2017, he was not in the top ten in the AL in any of the following categories: ERA+; ERA; WAR; FIP; adjusted pitching wins; or win probability added. Yes he was one of the top 15 starters on the White Sox, but not in the majors, or even in the AL.