Author Topic: Cubs in '17 - 👑👑👑 Reigning Champions Edition 👑👑👑  (Read 101821 times)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9236
I hate to give up Jimenez and Cease, but if you're going to give them up, this is seems to be an excellent return.  Possibly worth another WS or two, although we will likely feel the loss of the prospects down the road.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2017, 11:22:02 am by Playtwo »

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18846
I thought Quintana would cost more. He's owed $8.35 in 2018 with 2 $10.5 million options. The 2020 option can increase to $13 or $14 million depending on Cy Young finishes. That just makes the future payroll options so interesting. Good trade for both teams.
Agree Agree x 2 View List

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20339
Only Sale and Kluber have a higher WAR the last 3 years than Quintana in the AL. Not a torp, though.


If by TORP you mean a #1, he's not. If you're giving up Jimenez and Cease, I want a #1.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9236
Given the price of controllable #2 starting pitching, I'd say we did pretty well.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18846
Jimenez and Cease wouldn't get you a #1 unless it was a rental.  Lester/Quintana is going to be just fine as a 1/2 punch and you still have dollars left to improve the rotation further.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4724
I thought that Q would bring back more. Happy to have Eloy.

But if you look at this as spending 2.8 million on Eloy and 1.x on Cease... one hell of a purchase 4 million of prospects for a cost controlled top 15 starter.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
Top of rotation means 1/2, no? Otherwise what's the point of saying TORP in lieu of #1 to begin with? Quintana is a TORP.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18846
Some people seem to think it is only a #1.

I'm not sure how the options work for luxury tax purposes. If they don't count and just the buy outs Quintana will count for $4.4 million against the luxury tax. If the Cubs pick up his options and he reaches the max it will be $6.35 million against the tax. Heck even if the options can't include the rest of his contract it will still be less than what Lackey is getting paid. If they could sign Bryant, Russell and Hendricks to an extension that just covers their arb years it would help keep the future numbers down.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2017, 12:00:57 pm by CUBluejays »

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5916
High price to pay, but I like the move.

Eloy was going to have trouble breaking into our outfield with the commitments to Schwarber and Heyward, and for a team as full of talent as this is, I'd rather deal an asset like Eloy (who can really only play 2 places) than Happ, who is much more diverse.

guest61

  • Guest
Amen.

I don't want to move Happ.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
Jimenez and Cease wouldn't get you a #1 unless it was a rental.  Lester/Quintana is going to be just fine as a 1/2 punch and you still have dollars left to improve the rotation further.

Lester has an ERA+ of 99, and Quintana 95.  If that is the bet punching power you have, simply pack it in and go home.

Top of rotation means 1/2, no? Otherwise what's the point of saying TORP in lieu of #1 to begin with? Quintana is a TORP.

Quintana's best year was an ERA+ of 126, which is a decent #2, but not even a strong #2, and is not a #1.  And that is he BEST year.  THIS year he has an ERA+ of 95 -- he is not as good as league average.  For his career he has an ERA+ of 115.  To have a good idea of what he is, look at who his closest career comparable pitchers are thru age 27 (which does not include his disappointing 2017 season when he has been 28):
Pete Richert (966.5)
Brandon Webb (962.3)
Denny Lemaster (960.0)
Jon Niese (959.5)
Dick Bosman (957.7)
Bob Knepper (957.6)
Ed Halicki (956.2)
Dave Goltz (954.8 )
Dennis Bennett (954.8 )
Ken Hill (954.6)

If you find any #1 pitchers in there, we clearly have different definitions.  You don't even find strong #2 pitchers.

I thought that Q would bring back more. Happy to have Eloy.  But if you look at this as spending 2.8 million on Eloy and 1.x on Cease... one hell of a purchase 4 million of prospects for a cost controlled top 15 starter.

Oh, puuleeeze.

In 2016, his best season to date, and much better than he is in 2017, he was not in the top ten in the AL in any of the following categories: ERA+; ERA; WAR; FIP; adjusted pitching wins; or win probability added.  Yes he was one of the top 15 starters on the White Sox, but not in the majors, or even in the AL.

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
a
It's too fricking much to pay. In the past year we've dumped Torres, Jimenez and Cease

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17183
High price to pay, but I like the move.

Eloy was going to have trouble breaking into our outfield with the commitments to Schwarber and Heyward, and for a team as full of talent as this is, I'd rather deal an asset like Eloy (who can really only play 2 places) than Happ, who is much more diverse.

Happ is only diverse when you are willing to accept crappy defense.  Limit it to league average defense, and he can not play anywhere.  I am no longer attacking Happ in general, but to say he is "more diverse" in the field is premised on a willingness to accept crappy defense not weak, but Todd Walker quality defense.
Sad Sad x 1 View List

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16442
Poor decision by the Front Office.  Quintana is the kind of pitcher you can easily get on the free agent market.  Somewhat better than Hammel, but hardly a top rotation pitcher.  I am not concerned with the loss of cease, but Jimenez is going to be a great one.  I would much rather have traded Schwarber for a much better pitcher.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7170
a
It's too fricking much to pay. In the past year we've dumped Torres, Jimenez and Cease

Guess what else we've done in the past year?
Agree Agree x 3 Funny Funny x 2 View List