« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 223 224 [225] 226 227 ... 283   Go Down

Author Topic: Cubs in '18  (Read 171387 times)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18845
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3360 on: July 29, 2018, 06:30:04 pm »
Interesting...
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3361 on: July 29, 2018, 06:31:47 pm »
The #30 prospect in a bad system also seems like Diekman's approximate value.

Giambrone also seems like a decent second or third piece in a bigger deal.
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20339
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3362 on: July 29, 2018, 06:34:15 pm »
Twitter thinks it’s not Ziegler, fwiw...
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20339
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3363 on: July 29, 2018, 06:35:39 pm »
Quote from: brjones on July 29, 2018, 06:31:47 pm
The #30 prospect in a bad system also seems like Diekman's approximate value.

Giambrone also seems like a decent second or third piece in a bigger deal.

If that’s the cost, would love it to be Diekman.
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3364 on: July 29, 2018, 07:09:41 pm »
Well, Jesse Rogers tweeted that if there is a trade, it’s not with the Rangers.

Given that this has been out for more than an hour and nothing has leaked, this could be an out-of-nowhere big deal.
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18845
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3365 on: July 29, 2018, 07:10:42 pm »
Zach Duke and Fernando Rodney would be mildly interesting relievers from the Twins.
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3366 on: July 29, 2018, 07:18:26 pm »
A Blake Parker reunion wouldn’t be a bad idea, but he’d be more expensive.
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18845
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3367 on: July 29, 2018, 07:38:50 pm »
The Padres pen is impressive, but most of their guys are likely too expensive. Blue Jays maybe a possible team too.
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3368 on: July 29, 2018, 07:42:24 pm »
Conspiracy theorists on Twitter keep pointing out that both Almora and Happ are out of the lineup tonight, which is rare. It's all speculation based on nothing, but I guess it's worth noting.
Logged

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3369 on: July 29, 2018, 07:42:58 pm »
I was about to post the same Br.
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18845
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3370 on: July 29, 2018, 07:55:23 pm »
That would give them a 2 player bench. I think they’d make some move before that or a trade that large would break by now.
Logged

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3371 on: July 29, 2018, 07:57:29 pm »
Trent Giambrone, the #Cubs prospect who was pulled from his game today and reportedly seen hugging teammates in the dugout, is not the PTBNL in the Cole Hamels trade. And the #Cubs have no second deal in the works with the #Rangers. Just in case anyone was wondering ...--Crasnick
Logged

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3372 on: July 29, 2018, 07:58:03 pm »
And it's not Blake Parker,FYI.--Jesse Rogers
Logged

guest61

  • Guest
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3373 on: July 29, 2018, 08:00:00 pm »
Well.

Its gonna be hard for me to be productive until this is settled.
Logged

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26959
Re: Cubs in '18
« Reply #3374 on: July 29, 2018, 08:05:02 pm »
This is really out of the ordinary for trades over the last few years. I can't believe nothing has leaked yet. It's been over 3 hours since Mick Gillispie tweeted about Giambrone leaving early, and still nothing more than "it's not Texas, Miami, or Blake Parker."   
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 223 224 [225] 226 227 ... 283   Go Up
« previous next »