I wonder why Gallen wouldn't just re-sign with AZ, and get the one-year opt-out from them? Wouldn't cost them a draft pick, and to my recall they haven't spent a lot, have they? If they had money to pursue Bregman, if his deal had been a little cheaper, why not enough to afford Gallen? They are like $35 million below the Cubs in payroll, why not?
I've seen Padres mentioned as a Gallen possibility. They've lost Cease, Suarez, Arraez, but haven't really added anybody very significant, correct? Still, Spotrac already has their payroll still $20 above Cubs, so adding Gallen would tax them up higher. Maybe they wouldn't be too aggressive?
Atlanta has been mentioned, I think. They're less than $10 ahead of the Cubs in payroll, and Pecota has them as #3 team in baseball. Maybe they don't care about a 2nd-round draft pick, and would be happy to take a crack on Gallen at 1 year deal?
Each guy is his own man, and I don't know anything about Gallen. But I do recall the Belllinger-re-sign year, that some of the late-sign guys didn't start very fast. Gallen probably figures he's different, but I admit some reservations about signing a guy if he drags it out much longer. Maybe if you'd had him since January and had some ideas on how to help him, it would be one thing. But if he's rolling into camp late, will you be able to get the best out of him? Or maybe get the junky version, like when AZ signed Jordan Montgomery late. Part of me thinks Gallen might be well served to call Boras and say, lets get this done, what are the best offers you've gotten, I'd like to decide by Friday and get on with my season.