Author Topic: 2012 Chicago Bears  (Read 101061 times)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3304
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #435 on: February 02, 2012, 09:15:10 pm »
I still can't believe the Bears lost to Palko. Honest to God, Angelo should at least feel somewhat bad for the boning he gave the Bears, espcially backup qbs he brought in.  Awful doesn't begin to cover it.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20189
  • Location: Duh!
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #436 on: February 02, 2012, 09:27:01 pm »
Angelo had to go.  That was terrible.

A GM makes his name on the bottom of the depth chart and Angelo failed.

Plus having to spend huge bucks and draft picks to get Peppers and Cutler showed how bad he was failing at drafting talent.  Love those two pick ups by the way but iof he was doing his job they either would not have been neccesary or they would have put the Bears in the Superbowl.

He failed period and I am glad he is gone.  Now how long does Lovie get?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2470
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #437 on: February 03, 2012, 09:44:40 am »
Actually, I think a GM makes his bones with how his top draft picks pan out- as they are his "signature" picks and if they fail, so generally does the team to get over the hump.....

He can last longer if his bottom picks pan out (I think this was Jer's MO actually- Forget hitting on the high picks but hit enough of the low picks to appear competent....)

That said, it was not all his fault- but he was part of the problem at Halas Hall- not the solution. It is yet to be seen if Lovie is solution or part of the problem as well.....

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6034
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #438 on: February 03, 2012, 11:27:33 am »
I worry more about Knox's head than his back. I doubt that he would be cleared to play if there was a danger of further  injury but I don't know how you get your head right after a hit an injury like that. Talk about hearing footsteps.

Agree 100%.  He may start having alligator arms if he is afraid of getting bent backwards again. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5304
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #439 on: February 04, 2012, 12:53:26 am »

 Emery ... I just dont know what the fuuuck is going on here yet.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9029
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #440 on: February 07, 2012, 03:09:01 am »
Reggie Wayne, anyone? Get him and DeSean or Cut's reciever out in Miami and we'd be set.....

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3094
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #441 on: February 07, 2012, 05:40:32 am »
After watching the Giant's receivers, Cutler should have had serious consideration for the league MVP that went to Rodgers.  Nicks was incredible, every catch he made i am thinking and seething about Roy Williams.  He just snatched the ball, there was little doubt that the ball was going to be velcroed everytime it came his way.  Manningham and Cruz to boot?  I don't know who they had behind those 3, but our receivers fall in line after Manningham.

That would be a good target for Cutler, but would love to have Nicks... 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8299
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #442 on: February 07, 2012, 08:26:29 am »
I remember the big knock coming out on Nicks was his speed.  And I've pretty much come to the conclusion that straight line speed is really overrated when it comes to WRs.  Especially when you're facing pass rushes that barely give your QB 3 seconds to get the ball out anyway. I mean yeah, Hester's fast but how far has that gotten him as a WR?  Same with DeShaun Jackson.

What's more important than speed per se is the ability to separate from coverage, i.e., open up a window for your QB to get you the ball. We haven't had a big WR that can do that consistently for... well...  pretty much forever.

The good news is, this draft is chock full of WRs who are exactly like Nicks.  Big, strong guys with good hands who will never turn more than about a 4.5 in shorts but are gonna make plenty of catches on Sundays for the next few years for the teams smart enough to look past the 40 and pick them up.  There is more value at the WR position in this draft, right down to the 3rd round, then there has been in years and I hope our new GM is smart enough to take advantage.

« Last Edit: February 07, 2012, 08:28:44 am by yapper »

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2080
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #443 on: February 07, 2012, 08:50:33 am »
Eli talked about familiarity of the offense as credit to his improved numbers - both he and his receivers have been in the same offense for 3 years - so they read and react to things similarly now

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8299
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #444 on: February 07, 2012, 11:33:56 am »
Wow...  another one I didn't see coming.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-bears-hire-bates-to-be-qb-coach-20120207,0,6705053.story

Great news for Cutler.  Gotta wonder if Emery pulled rank cause according to multiple reports Lovie wasn't keen on this guy.

There isn't much not to like about Bates, IMO.  He helped Seattle get to the playoffs (and beat the Saints) with a Seahawks team that had even less talent on offense than the Bears...  so with some offseason upgrades at OL and WR here I think he'll do just fine.

It's rather embarrassing that it looks like we're getting him by default when he should have been our first pick all along...  but as long as we don't botch the OL coach hiring and Emery doesn't step on his dick in the draft, I have to rate this offseason as being pretty successful.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2012, 11:46:30 am by yapper »

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 920
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #445 on: February 07, 2012, 11:59:49 am »
When is the last time the Bears made an offensive coaching hire and you thought, "Well, that was well handled and went smoothly?"

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8299
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #446 on: February 07, 2012, 12:04:22 pm »
When is the last time the Bears made an offensive coaching hire and you thought, "Well, that was well handled and went smoothly?"

I can't remember the last time I could say that about ANY Bears hire...

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #447 on: February 07, 2012, 12:19:23 pm »
I like this hire.  Think it's a step in the right direction.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2218
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #448 on: February 07, 2012, 12:25:17 pm »
Can anyone tell me how to stop the video and sound from starting up whenever you look at a tribune web page? Is there a setting I can change?

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8299
Re: 2012 Chicago Bears
« Reply #449 on: February 07, 2012, 12:26:40 pm »
Now get Brandon Marshall in here and they can put the band back together.

28 years old, 6'4 230, highly motivated to play on a good team, and loves Cutler...  works for me.