What I do care about is "cheating". I think what Barry Bonds did to Baseball is on the order of 100 times worse than anything Pete Rose ever did.
Hank Aaron and Mike Schmidt cheated when they tried amphetamines, even if it was just once or a few times. And don't say that steroids are worse because they help more because (1) there's no proof of that, and (2) using either
illegal drug shows the same lack of character--both situations involve trying the most effective available illegal substance to try to gain a competitive advantage. As soon as BBWAA members start campaigning to remove cheaters like Aaron and Schmidt from the Hall of Fame, I'll reconsider whether or not I think Bonds should be there.
I used to think it would be fun to visit the Hall of Fame someday. But a Hall of Fame without Bonds, Clemens, Bagwell, Biggio, and Piazza (among others) just doesn't interest me at all. Those are the dominant players of the era of baseball I watched, and the Hall of Fame is just a farce without them.
As I posted earlier this week, the Hall of Fame lost over $2 million in 2011, and has lost money in 8 of the last 10 years. And with this vote, they've probably ensured another money-losing year since their biggest weekend of the year will be a non-event. That's not sustainable. Making the Hall of Fame irrelevant to many fans under 40--fans who have disposable income and young children to introduce to the game--is just going to speed up it's decline and eventual closing.