I thought that he already had an interlock device and had disabled it. That was part of the seriousness. It was multiple DUIs, not one.
No, DelMarFan, it was one DUI conviction within the last two years, and then another from about October of last year. The One DUI incident from last fall was what he pled guilty on yesterday. That incident was broken down into four different charges, but all were from the same DUI, and under Arizona's sentencing law (which is the same in most other states) even if he had been convicted on all four counts, the sentences would have run at the same time, meaning that many of the news reports about how much time he faced in prison were nonsense since the reporters added together the possible sentence for each offense and totaled them -- that is NOT the way it is done. Additionally, while everyone kicks Grace while he is down, his blood alcohol level was less than .10, which until very recently was the standard level required to create a presumption that the driver was impaired. That has been reduced in many states in recent years, generally to .08, and Grace was above that limit. At Grace's body weight, three beers would put him at the level he had. So far, in all of the coverage, I have seen nothing about why the cop stopped Grace in the first place, and a great many stops are made without actual probable cause, and with a good defense attorney and a judge who follows the law, those cases should be dismissed.
A great many other stops are made with proper legal justification for the stop, but without anything resembling evidence the driver was actually impaired. (For instance, a tail light was out, providing a basis for the stop, but no probable cause that he was impaired since the driving observed by the officer was fine.) And in those cases, a good defense attorney, and a sympathetic defendant, will often result in not guilty verdicts.
In other words, while Grace never should have been driving on a suspended license, and as someone who clearly has a history of trouble with alcohol he also should never have been driving after drinking ANYTHING, and while what he did was foolish, unless his driving was in fact impaired (and at the moment I have seen nothing to indicate that it was), there is no reason to condemn him for putting the lives of others at risk, and there is a good deal to commend him for in entering the guilty plea to accept responsibility for his stupidity and to move on.