Author Topic: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)  (Read 58647 times)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7112
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #900 on: March 19, 2013, 12:48:06 pm »

Peppers on his last leg?  I really have to disagree there.

Yeah, maybe Peppers was injured last year - there was talk of a foot injury.  But his numbers last year were very consistent with the year before in tackles and sacks.

Teams have to game plan him which gives opportunities to everyone else on defense.  Bears have a nice DE rotation that gives him breaks during the game which could end up pro-longing his career and overall  effectiveness.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8299
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #901 on: March 19, 2013, 12:49:52 pm »
I would say Peppers has a lot more left in the tank than Urlacher.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16065
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #902 on: March 19, 2013, 01:35:01 pm »
Peppers on his last leg?  I really have to disagree there.

Lets just agree to disagree there. He isn't a spring chicken either.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8299
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #903 on: March 19, 2013, 01:45:30 pm »
A lot of it depends on if he's able to put this foot ailment behind him this offseason.

If it's a chronic thing then we've probably seen his best days but if he can get back to 100% pain free I think we'd be glad we still had him.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2864
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #904 on: March 20, 2013, 02:22:19 pm »
would be nice if McClellan and Wooton can play more and give Peppers more plays off.
I'd still like to see Izzy retire a Bear.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16065
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #905 on: March 20, 2013, 06:31:28 pm »
There is more talk of McClellan playing MLB for the Bears

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3304
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #906 on: March 20, 2013, 07:11:37 pm »
They better do something pretty quick with both Roach and Urlacher gone.  I can see a Bear team having to score 45 or more to win. 

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6704
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #907 on: March 20, 2013, 11:12:36 pm »
Peppers foot condition isn't "curable"   still he made the pro bowl.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #908 on: March 21, 2013, 12:40:52 am »
Don't worry.  Our resident genius said the Bears shouldn't focus on defense.  It's all good!!!

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5304
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #909 on: March 22, 2013, 08:07:33 pm »

 LB
 OL
 LB
 OL ... rest of the picks ... BPA.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7901
  • Location: Minonk , IL
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #910 on: March 23, 2013, 01:03:41 pm »

Rob Demovsky, USA TODAY Sports12:23p.m. EDT March 21, 2013

Packers coach Mike McCarthy says Adrian Peterson and the playoff loss to the Niners were the team's "two black eyes"
McCarthy says anybody who watches film will decide to run the read-option against the Packers if they have the right QB
The Packers could see a heavy dose of the read-option with the 49ers, Redskins and Eagles on the schedule

PHOENIX — Mike McCarthy didn't need to wait until the Green Bay Packers completed their crash course on defending the read option or give defensive coordinator Dom Capers time to finish his offseason analysis to know what his team must do better this season.

Even before both tasks were completed within the last two weeks, it was obvious.

Just roll any tape from the last month of the season, when Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson rushed for 409 yards in two games against the Packers and San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick used the read-option offense to pile up 181 yards rushing as the Packers got eliminated in the NFC divisional playoff round for the second straight season.

"Adrian Peterson and the San Francisco game were our two black eyes," McCarthy said Wednesday during the NFC coaches breakfast on the final day of the NFL annual meetings. "And that's where we've got to be better. Those are big games. We've got to play better defense in big games."

And with that, Capers received his orders for this season.

It included, but was not limited to, a trip to College Station, Texas two weeks ago, when Capers and his staff spent the day with the coaches at Texas A&M to pick their brains about the read-option that is expected to become more prevalent in the NFL this season. Aggies coach Kevin Sumlin, who has the multi-dimensional, Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback Johnny Manziel, led the one-day session.

"I think it's a great changeup and a great opportunity for our defensive staff to do that," McCarthy said. "Kevin Sumlin and his staff are very gracious and there's a ton of feedback going back and forth. Kevin was in the room the whole time giving an offensive perspective. Our defensive staff was in the room with their defensive staff. It was a conversation that was very, very helpful, and I'm sure there will be some things we take away from that visit."

There's a good chance the Packers will have to put some of what they learned to the test this season. Their schedule includes the 49ers, Washington Redskins and Philadelphia Eagles — all teams that will use the read-option to one degree or another.

********And just a few tables away from where McCarthy was speaking, first-year Chicago Bears coach Marc Trestman said, "The read-option will be part of our package."***************************

"I'm not a crystal ball, but I know we're going to see it early and often," McCarthy said. "If I was playing against us, I'd make sure that if we had that kind of quarterback that you would test the Green Bay Packers. Everybody's going to watch (our) last game. Let's not be naïve to that."

Demovsky writes for the Green Bay Press-Gazette, a Gannett property.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3094
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #911 on: March 24, 2013, 07:27:01 am »
And i still say, the way I would defend the read option is pretty simple.  Blast the quarterback whether he holds the ball or not.  And while your at it it, go for his legs like you would a running back.  In the read option, the QB has declared himself as a runner, and the protection of being a quarterback is gone.  No more, one step, two step penalty.  Forget the running back.  Annihilate the qb everytime they run the play.  Heck I might even commit two guys to blowing him up.

You would see that go out of the NFL very quickly, I can't be the only person thinking about this and I bet there are a few blows coming the ways of Kapernick, Wilson, and RG3

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 20189
  • Location: Duh!
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #912 on: March 24, 2013, 10:30:33 am »
Agreed.  After a few teams lose their star QB running it, it will be history.  Either that or they will only run it with a back up or non-QB.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5304
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #913 on: March 28, 2013, 02:32:55 am »
And i still say, the way I would defend the read option is pretty simple.  Blast the quarterback whether he holds the ball or not.  And while your at it it, go for his legs like you would a running back.  In the read option, the QB has declared himself as a runner, and the protection of being a quarterback is gone.  No more, one step, two step penalty.  Forget the running back.  Annihilate the qb everytime they run the play.  Heck I might even commit two guys to blowing him up.

You would see that go out of the NFL very quickly, I can't be the only person thinking about this and I bet there are a few blows coming the ways of Kapernick, Wilson, and RG3

 This hasnt played out yet ... you better be right.

 
Agreed.  After a few teams lose their star QB running it, it will be history.  Either that or they will only run it with a back up or non-QB.

 The NFL at least for the next season will be running this all over the place.

 Its a more aerial ball then running game ... look at how TE's went up in value and how RB's went down in value.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3199
Re: NFC North (04.12.11 - 09.10.15)
« Reply #914 on: March 29, 2013, 06:56:21 pm »
From the Pioneer Press

It's always easy for paranoid Minnesotans to blame the weather when top free agents sign with warm-weather teams instead of our frozen-tundra favorites.  In the case of free agent wide receiver Mike Wallace, that was exactly the case.  The Miami Dolphins' new deep threat told the Miami Herald that the Vikings actually offered him the most money, but instead he chose a team that has not won a playoff game since 2000.

"The (Vikings) had come to the point where they were telling him, 'You don't have to live here, just be here during the season,' " Wallace's father, Mike Jr., said in an interview with the Herald's Adam H. Beasley. "He wanted to get out of that snow and cold weather."

Wallace, who suffers from asthma, played four seasons in occasionally frigid Pittsburgh. So it was an easy decision to take his talents and maladies to South Beach.  His five-year deal with Miami was worth $60 million. His father did not reveal how much more the Vikings were offering.

--------------------------

Rip it up. Shred it. Scrap the whole thing or start again from a position of strength.  I'm talking here about the flawed deal state legislators and the governor were bamboozled into making to help build a new Vikings stadium. Since there's really no contract or written agreement to this public fleecing, I'm strongly suggesting an extreme makeover.  This already was corporate welfare at its worst. Then news broke this month that confirms that Minneapolis and state taxpayers will be getting hosed for more than the $498 million in public contributions to the estimated $975 million stadium project.  It turns out that the $35 million projected in annual revenues from state-approved electronic charitable gambling actually yielded about $1.7 million last year. Now, this was the projection that would take care of the state's $348 million contribution.  Given that bars and restaurants are not exactly embracing the e-pull-tab and e-bingo devices because they are not being used as sold, I have no doubt they're going to eventually tap into the general fund or come up with another scheme to shake down the taxpayer for more money.  And who came up with this grossly inflated projection? Why, the state gambling control board, after consulting with -- guess who? -- the gambling industry, a consultation Dayton admitted recently he did not know about.  With all due respect, that's like a farmer asking a fox to go into the henhouse and let him know if plenty of chickens are inside.  "Plenty for sure," the fox mumbles as it comes out, spitting feathers from its mouth.